Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels
In a category with zero morphisms, the kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is
the equalizer of `f` and `0 : X ⟶ Y`. (Similarly the cokernel is the coequalizer.)
The basic definitions are
* `kernel : (X ⟶ Y) → C`
* `kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X`
* `kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0` and
* `kernel.lift (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f` (as well as the dual versions)
## Main statements
Besides the definition and lifts, we prove
* `kernel.ιZeroIsIso`: a kernel map of a zero morphism is an isomorphism
* `kernel.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel`: if `kernel.ι f` is an epimorphism, then `f = 0`
* `kernel.ofMono`: the kernel of a monomorphism is the zero object
* `kernel.liftMono`: the lift of a monomorphism `k : W ⟶ X` such that `k ≫ f = 0`
is still a monomorphism
* `kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone`: if our category has a zero object, then the map from the zero
object is a kernel map of any monomorphism
* `kernel.ιOfZero`: `kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)` is an isomorphism
and the corresponding dual statements.
## Future work
* TODO: connect this with existing work in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₂ u u' u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- A morphism `f` has a kernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasKernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)
/-- A morphism `f` has a cokernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
section
/-- A kernel fork is just a fork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev KernelFork :=
Fork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem KernelFork.condition (s : KernelFork f) : Fork.ι s ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [Fork.condition, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem KernelFork.app_one (s : KernelFork f) : s.π.app one = 0 := by
simp [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
/-- A morphism `ι` satisfying `ι ≫ f = 0` determines a kernel fork over `f`. -/
abbrev KernelFork.ofι {Z : C} (ι : Z ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) : KernelFork f :=
Fork.ofι ι <| by rw [w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
@[simp]
theorem KernelFork.ι_ofι {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) :
Fork.ι (KernelFork.ofι ι w) = ι := rfl
section
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy nor case_bash
/-- Every kernel fork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `fork.ofι (fork.ι s) _`. -/
def isoOfι (s : Fork f 0) : s ≅ Fork.ofι (Fork.ι s) (Fork.condition s) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by rintro ⟨j⟩ <;> simp
/-- If `ι = ι'`, then `fork.ofι ι _` and `fork.ofι ι' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofιCongr {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} {w : ι ≫ f = 0} (h : ι = ι') :
KernelFork.ofι ι w ≅ KernelFork.ofι ι' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
/-- If `F` is an equivalence, then applying `F` to a diagram indexing a (co)kernel of `f` yields
the diagram indexing the (co)kernel of `F.map f`. -/
def compNatIso {D : Type u'} [Category.{v} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.IsEquivalence] :
parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F ≅ parallelPair (F.map f) 0 :=
let app (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F).obj j ≅ (parallelPair (F.map f) 0).obj j :=
match j with
| zero => Iso.refl _
| one => Iso.refl _
NatIso.ofComponents app <| by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ <;> intro g <;> cases g <;> simp [app]
end
/-- If `s` is a limit kernel fork and `k : W ⟶ X` satisfies `k ≫ f = 0`, then there is some
`l : W ⟶ s.X` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a kernel fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : KernelFork f) (lift : ∀ s : KernelFork f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : KernelFork f, lift s ≫ t.ι = s.ι)
(uniq : ∀ (s : KernelFork f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· exact fac s
· simp
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.zero) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` constructed using
`KernelFork.ofι` is a limit cone.
-/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (eq : g ≫ f = 0)
(lift : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (_ : g' ≫ f = 0), W' ⟶ W)
(fac : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0), lift g' eq' ≫ g = g')
(uniq :
∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0) (m : W' ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ g = g'), m = lift g' eq') :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι g eq) :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => lift s.ι s.condition) (fun s => fac s.ι s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.ι s.condition
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` of the form
`KernelFork.ofι i _` is a limit cone when we know that `i` is a monomorphism. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι' {X Y K : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (i : K ⟶ X) (w : i ≫ f = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : A ⟶ X) (_ : k ≫ f = 0), { l : A ⟶ K // l ≫ i = k}) [hi : Mono i] :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i w) :=
ofι _ _ (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_mono i, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every kernel of `f` induces a kernel of `f ≫ g` if `g` is mono. -/
def isKernelCompMono {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g] {h : X ⟶ Z}
(hh : h = f ≫ g) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι (by simp [hh]) : KernelFork h) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : KernelFork f := Fork.ofι s.ι (by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp [← hh, s.condition])
let l := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' i s'.ι s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
theorem isKernelCompMono_lift {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g]
{h : X ⟶ Z} (hh : h = f ≫ g) (s : KernelFork h) :
(isKernelCompMono i g hh).lift s = i.lift (Fork.ofι s.ι (by
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) := rfl
/-- Every kernel of `f ≫ g` is also a kernel of `f`, as long as `c.ι ≫ f` vanishes. -/
def isKernelOfComp {W : C} (g : Y ⟶ W) (h : X ⟶ W) {c : KernelFork h} (i : IsLimit c)
(hf : c.ι ≫ f = 0) (hfg : f ≫ g = h) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι hf) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => i.lift (KernelFork.ofι s.ι (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι]) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; simpa using h
/-- `X` identifies to the kernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (𝟙 X) (show 𝟙 X ≫ f = 0 by rw [hf, comp_zero])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.comp_id _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.comp_id])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the kernel of a given monomorphisms. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hf : Mono f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsLimit c :=
isLimitAux _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [zero_comp, ← cancel_mono f, zero_comp, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_tgt _ _)
lemma KernelFork.IsLimit.isIso_ι {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hc : IsLimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.ι := by
let e : c.pt ≅ X := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : e.inv ≫ c.ι = 𝟙 X := Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hc
haveI : IsIso (e.inv ≫ c.ι) := by
rw [eq]
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left e.inv c.ι
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, `e : X ≅ X'` and `g' : X' ⟶ Y` is a morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{X' Y' : C} (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (e : X ≅ X')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') (c.ι ≫ e.hom) (by simp [← iff])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun s hs ↦ hc.lift (KernelFork.ofι (ι := s ≫ e.inv)
(by rw [iff, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, hs])))
(fun s hs ↦ by simp [← cancel_mono e.inv])
(fun s hs m hm ↦ Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by simpa [← cancel_mono e.hom] using hm))
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, and `g' : X ⟶ Y'` is a another morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff' {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{Y' : C} (g' : X ⟶ Y')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') c.ι (by simp [← iff])) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff hc g' (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using iff))
(Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
end
namespace KernelFork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of kernel forks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsLimit (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ⟶ kf'.pt :=
hf'.lift (KernelFork.ofι (kf.ι ≫ φ.left) (by simp))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapOfIsLimit_ι (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ ≫ kf'.ι = kf.ι ≫ φ.left :=
hf'.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit kernel forks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsLimit {kf : KernelFork f} {kf' : KernelFork f'}
(hf : IsLimit kf) (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ≅ kf'.pt where
hom := kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ.hom
inv := kf'.mapOfIsLimit hf φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end KernelFork
section
variable [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism, expressed as the equalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev kernel (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] : C :=
equalizer f 0
/-- The map from `kernel f` into the source of `f`. -/
abbrev kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X :=
equalizer.ι f 0
@[simp]
theorem equalizer_as_kernel : equalizer.ι f 0 = kernel.ι f := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0 :=
KernelFork.condition _
/-- The kernel built from `kernel.ι f` is limiting. -/
def kernelIsKernel : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (kernel.ι f) ((kernel.condition f).trans comp_zero.symm)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- Given any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0`, `k` factors through `kernel.ι f`
via `kernel.lift : W ⟶ kernel f`. -/
abbrev kernel.lift {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f :=
(kernelIsKernel f).lift (KernelFork.ofι k h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.lift_ι {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : kernel.lift f k h ≫ kernel.ι f = k :=
(kernelIsKernel f).fac (KernelFork.ofι k h) WalkingParallelPair.zero
@[simp]
theorem kernel.lift_zero {W : C} {h} : kernel.lift f (0 : W ⟶ X) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
instance kernel.lift_mono {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) [Mono k] : Mono (kernel.lift f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := w =≫ kernel.ι f
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.lift_ι] at w
exact (cancel_mono k).1 w⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ kernel f` such that
`l ≫ kernel.ι f = k`. -/
def kernel.lift' {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ kernel f // l ≫ kernel.ι f = k } :=
⟨kernel.lift f k h, kernel.lift_ι _ _ _⟩
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of kernels. -/
abbrev kernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : kernel f ⟶ kernel f' :=
kernel.lift f' (kernel.ι f ≫ p) (by simp [← w])
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
X ---> kernel g
| |
| | kernel.map
| |
v v
X' --> kernel g'
-/
theorem kernel.lift_map {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(f' : X' ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') [HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
kernel.lift g f w ≫ kernel.map g g' q r h₂ = p ≫ kernel.lift g' f' w' := by
ext; simp [h₁]
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of kernels. -/
@[simps]
def kernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : kernel f ≅ kernel f' where
hom := kernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv :=
kernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv
(by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
/-- Every kernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance kernel.ι_zero_isIso : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
theorem eq_zero_of_epi_kernel [Epi (kernel.ι f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_epi (kernel.ι f)).1 (by simp)
/-- The kernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def kernelZeroIsoSource : kernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ X :=
equalizer.isoSourceOfSelf 0
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_hom : kernelZeroIsoSource.hom = kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_inv :
kernelZeroIsoSource.inv = kernel.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 X) (by simp) := by
ext
simp [kernelZeroIsoSource]
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their kernels are isomorphic. -/
def kernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g :=
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : kernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (kernel f) := by
ext
simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
/- Porting note: induction on Eq is trying instantiate another g... -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ kernel.ι g = kernel.ι f := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ kernel.ι _ = kernel.ι _ := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).hom = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).inv = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] [HasKernel h] (w₁ : f = g)
(w₂ : g = h) : kernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ kernelIsoOfEq w₂ = kernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
variable {f}
| theorem kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : ¬Epi (kernel.ι f) := fun _ =>
w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
theorem kernel_not_iso_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso (kernel.ι f) → False := fun _ =>
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 400 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SFinite ν] [SFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prodMk_right
apply measurable_const.prodMk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ae : (ae μ)⁻¹ = ae μ := by
refine le_antisymm (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae ?_
nth_rewrite 1 [← inv_inv (ae μ)]
exact Filter.map_mono (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventuallyConst_inv_set_ae :
EventuallyConst (s⁻¹ : Set G) (ae μ) ↔ EventuallyConst s (ae μ) := by
rw [← inv_preimage, eventuallyConst_preimage, Filter.map_inv, inv_ae]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
have := map_map (μ := μ) (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
rw [← this]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
| · exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 230 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Complex
/-!
# Embeddings of number fields
This file defines the embeddings of a number field into an algebraic closed field.
## Main Definitions and Results
* `NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly`: let `x ∈ K` with `K` number field and
let `A` be an algebraic closed field of char. 0, then the images of `x` by the embeddings of `K`
in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`.
* `NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one`: an algebraic integer whose conjugates are
all of norm one is a root of unity.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace`: the type of infinite places of a number field `K`.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff`: two complex embeddings define the same infinite place iff
they are equal or complex conjugates.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm`: the infinite part of the product formula, that is
for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where the product is over the infinite place `w` and
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`.
## Tags
number field, embeddings, places, infinite places
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace NumberField.Embeddings
section Fintype
open Module
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
/-- There are finitely many embeddings of a number field. -/
noncomputable instance : Fintype (K →+* A) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (K →ₐ[ℚ] A) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm
variable [IsAlgClosed A]
/-- The number of embeddings of a number field is equal to its finrank. -/
theorem card : Fintype.card (K →+* A) = finrank ℚ K := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm, AlgHom.card]
instance : Nonempty (K →+* A) := by
rw [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, NumberField.Embeddings.card K A]
exact Module.finrank_pos
end Fintype
section Roots
open Set Polynomial
variable (K A : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [Field A] [Algebra ℚ A] [IsAlgClosed A] (x : K)
/-- Let `A` be an algebraically closed field and let `x ∈ K`, with `K` a number field.
The images of `x` by the embeddings of `K` in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of
the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`. -/
theorem range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly :
(range fun φ : K →+* A => φ x) = (minpoly ℚ x).rootSet A := by
convert (NumberField.isAlgebraic K).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly A x using 1
ext a
exact ⟨fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRatAlgHom, hφ⟩, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRingHom, hφ⟩⟩
end Roots
section Bounded
open Module Polynomial Set
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedField A] [IsAlgClosed A] [NormedAlgebra ℚ A]
theorem coeff_bdd_of_norm_le {B : ℝ} {x : K} (h : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B) (i : ℕ) :
‖(minpoly ℚ x).coeff i‖ ≤ max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2) := by
have hx := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral ℚ x
rw [← norm_algebraMap' A, ← coeff_map (algebraMap ℚ A)]
refine coeff_bdd_of_roots_le _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) (minpoly.natDegree_le x) (fun z hz => ?_) i
classical
rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hz
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly K A x).symm.subset hz
exact h φ
variable (K A)
/-- Let `B` be a real number. The set of algebraic integers in `K` whose conjugates are all
smaller in norm than `B` is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_norm_le (B : ℝ) : {x : K | IsIntegral ℤ x ∧ ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B}.Finite := by
classical
let C := Nat.ceil (max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2))
have := bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ K) (finrank ℚ K) (finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)
refine this.subset fun x hx => ?_; simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
have h_map_ℚ_minpoly := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx.1
refine ⟨_, ⟨?_, fun i => ?_⟩, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx.1, minpoly.aeval ℤ x⟩⟩
· rw [← (minpoly.monic hx.1).natDegree_map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ), ← h_map_ℚ_minpoly]
exact minpoly.natDegree_le x
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| coeff_bdd_of_norm_le hx.2 i).trans (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [h_map_ℚ_minpoly, coeff_map, eq_intCast, Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
/-- An algebraic integer whose conjugates are all of norm one is a root of unity. -/
theorem pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one {x : K} (hxi : IsIntegral ℤ x) (hx : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ = 1) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), x ^ n = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, habne, h⟩ :=
@Set.Infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo _ _ _ _ (x ^ · : ℕ → K) Set.infinite_univ
(by exact fun a _ => ⟨hxi.pow a, fun φ => by simp [hx φ]⟩) (finite_of_norm_le K A (1 : ℝ))
wlog hlt : b < a
· exact this K A hxi hx b a habne.symm h.symm (habne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
refine ⟨a - b, tsub_pos_of_lt hlt, ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le, pow_add, mul_left_eq_self₀] at h
refine h.resolve_right fun hp => ?_
specialize hx (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := ℚ)).toRingHom
rw [pow_eq_zero hp, map_zero, norm_zero] at hx; norm_num at hx
end Bounded
end NumberField.Embeddings
section Place
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {A : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing A] [Nontrivial A] (φ : K →+* A)
/-- An embedding into a normed division ring defines a place of `K` -/
def NumberField.place : AbsoluteValue K ℝ :=
(IsAbsoluteValue.toAbsoluteValue (norm : A → ℝ)).comp φ.injective
@[simp]
theorem NumberField.place_apply (x : K) : (NumberField.place φ) x = norm (φ x) := rfl
end Place
namespace NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
open Complex NumberField
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable (K) in
/--
A (random) lift of the complex embedding `φ : k →+* ℂ` to an extension `K` of `k`.
-/
noncomputable def lift [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := by
letI := φ.toAlgebra
exact (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := k)).toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_algebraMap [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) :
(lift K φ).comp (algebraMap k K) = φ := by
unfold lift
letI := φ.toAlgebra
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra']
@[simp]
theorem lift_algebraMap_apply [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) (x : k) :
lift K φ (algebraMap k K x) = φ x :=
RingHom.congr_fun (lift_comp_algebraMap φ) x
/-- The conjugate of a complex embedding as a complex embedding. -/
abbrev conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := star φ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_coe_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (conjugate φ) x = conj (φ x) := rfl
theorem place_conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : place (conjugate φ) = place φ := by
ext; simp only [place_apply, norm_conj, conjugate_coe_eq]
/-- An embedding into `ℂ` is real if it is fixed by complex conjugation. -/
abbrev IsReal (φ : K →+* ℂ) : Prop := IsSelfAdjoint φ
theorem isReal_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal φ ↔ conjugate φ = φ := isSelfAdjoint_iff
theorem isReal_conjugate_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal (conjugate φ) ↔ IsReal φ :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
/-- A real embedding as a ring homomorphism from `K` to `ℝ` . -/
def IsReal.embedding {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) : K →+* ℝ where
toFun x := (φ x).re
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_re]
map_mul' := by
simp only [Complex.conj_eq_iff_im.mp (RingHom.congr_fun hφ _), map_mul, mul_re,
mul_zero, tsub_zero, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, zero_re]
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, add_re, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem IsReal.coe_embedding_apply {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) (x : K) :
(hφ.embedding x : ℂ) = φ x := by
apply Complex.ext
· rfl
· rw [ofReal_im, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact RingHom.congr_fun hφ x
lemma IsReal.comp (f : k →+* K) {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) :
IsReal (φ.comp f) := by ext1 x; simpa using RingHom.congr_fun hφ (f x)
lemma isReal_comp_iff {f : k ≃+* K} {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (φ.comp (f : k →+* K)) ↔ IsReal φ :=
⟨fun H ↦ by convert H.comp f.symm.toRingHom; ext1; simp, IsReal.comp _⟩
lemma exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq [Algebra k K] [IsGalois k K] (φ ψ : K →+* ℂ)
(h : φ.comp (algebraMap k K) = ψ.comp (algebraMap k K)) :
∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, φ.comp σ.symm = ψ := by
letI := (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)).toAlgebra
letI := φ.toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower k K ℂ := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
let ψ' : K →ₐ[k] ℂ := { ψ with commutes' := fun r ↦ (RingHom.congr_fun h r).symm }
use (AlgHom.restrictNormal' ψ' K).symm
ext1 x
exact AlgHom.restrictNormal_commutes ψ' K x
variable [Algebra k K] (φ : K →+* ℂ) (σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K)
/--
`IsConj φ σ` states that `σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K` is the conjugation under the embedding `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
-/
def IsConj : Prop := conjugate φ = φ.comp σ
variable {φ σ}
lemma IsConj.eq (h : IsConj φ σ) (x) : φ (σ x) = star (φ x) := RingHom.congr_fun h.symm x
lemma IsConj.ext {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) (h₂ : IsConj φ σ₂) : σ₁ = σ₂ :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun x ↦ φ.injective ((h₁.eq x).trans (h₂.eq x).symm)
lemma IsConj.ext_iff {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) : σ₁ = σ₂ ↔ IsConj φ σ₂ :=
⟨fun e ↦ e ▸ h₁, h₁.ext⟩
lemma IsConj.isReal_comp (h : IsConj φ σ) : IsReal (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)) := by
ext1 x
simp only [conjugate_coe_eq, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ← h.eq,
starRingEnd_apply, AlgEquiv.commutes]
lemma isConj_one_iff : IsConj φ (1 : K ≃ₐ[k] K) ↔ IsReal φ := Iff.rfl
|
alias ⟨_, IsReal.isConjGal_one⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.isConj_one_iff
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Embeddings.lean | 247 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.MonoidWithZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Ring
/-!
# Localizations of commutative rings
This file contains various basic results on localizations.
We characterize the localization of a commutative ring `R` at a submonoid `M` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative ring `S` is the localization of `R` at `M` iff we can find a
ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ M`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : S`, there exists `(x, y) : R × M` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : R` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ M` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
In the following, let `R, P` be commutative rings, `S, Q` be `R`- and `P`-algebras
and `M, T` be submonoids of `R` and `P` respectively, e.g.:
```
variable (R S P Q : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing P] [CommRing Q]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra P Q] (M : Submonoid R) (T : Submonoid P)
```
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.algEquiv`: if `Q` is another localization of `R` at `M`, then `S` and `Q`
are isomorphic as `R`-algebras
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
A previous version of this file used a fully bundled type of ring localization maps,
then used a type synonym `f.codomain` for `f : LocalizationMap M S` to instantiate the
`R`-algebra structure on `S`. This results in defining ad-hoc copies for everything already
defined on `S`. By making `IsLocalization` a predicate on the `algebraMap R S`,
we can ensure the localization map commutes nicely with other `algebraMap`s.
To prove most lemmas about a localization map `algebraMap R S` in this file we invoke the
corresponding proof for the underlying `CommMonoid` localization map
`IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap M S`, which can be found in `GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization`
and the namespace `Submonoid.LocalizationMap`.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_of_mk'` and associated lemmas.
These show the quotient map `mk : R → M → Localization M` equals the surjection
`LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map `algebraMap : R →+* Localization M`.
The lemma `mk_eq_of_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file,
which are about the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
The proof that "a `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R \ {0}`
is a field" is a `def` rather than an `instance`, so if you want to reason about a field of
fractions `K`, assume `[Field K]` instead of just `[CommRing K]`.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Function
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
variable {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommSemiring (R i)]
variable {i : ι} (S : Submonoid (R i))
/-- `IsLocalization.map` applied to a projection homomorphism from a product ring. -/
noncomputable abbrev mapPiEvalRingHom :
Localization (S.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i) →+* Localization S :=
map (T := S) _ (Pi.evalRingHom R i) le_rfl
open Function in
theorem mapPiEvalRingHom_bijective : Bijective (mapPiEvalRingHom S) := by
let T := S.comap (Pi.evalRingHom R i)
classical
refine ⟨fun x₁ x₂ eq ↦ ?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r₁, s₁, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₁
obtain ⟨r₂, s₂, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₂
simp_rw [map_mk'] at eq
rw [IsLocalization.eq] at eq ⊢
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := eq
refine ⟨⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩, funext fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa using hs
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
· obtain ⟨r, s, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective S x
exact ⟨mk' (M := T) _ (update 0 i r) ⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩,
by simp [map_mk']⟩
end Localization
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M N : Submonoid R} {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
namespace IsLocalization
section IsLocalization
variable [IsLocalization M S]
variable (M S) in
include M in
theorem linearMap_compatibleSMul (N₁ N₂) [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₁]
[Module S N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module S N₂] [IsScalarTower R S N₁] [IsScalarTower R S N₂] :
LinearMap.CompatibleSMul N₁ N₂ S R where
map_smul f s s' := by
obtain ⟨r, m, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M s
rw [← (map_units S m).smul_left_cancel]
simp_rw [algebraMap_smul, ← map_smul, ← smul_assoc, smul_mk'_self, algebraMap_smul, map_smul]
variable {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y))
variable (M) in
include M in
-- This is not an instance since the submonoid `M` would become a metavariable in typeclass search.
theorem algHom_subsingleton [Algebra R P] : Subsingleton (S →ₐ[R] P) :=
⟨fun f g =>
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective <|
IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M <| by rw [f.comp_algebraMap, g.comp_algebraMap]⟩
section AlgEquiv
variable {Q : Type*} [CommSemiring Q] [Algebra R Q] [IsLocalization M Q]
section
variable (M S Q)
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` at the submonoid `M` respectively,
there is an isomorphism of localizations `S ≃ₐ[R] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : S ≃ₐ[R] Q :=
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q (RingEquiv.refl R) M.map_id with
commutes' := ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ }
end
theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S Q (mk' S x y) = mk' Q x y := by
simp
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S Q).symm (mk' Q x y) = mk' S x y := by simp
variable (M) in
include M in
protected lemma bijective (f : S →+* Q) (hf : f.comp (algebraMap R S) = algebraMap R Q) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(show f = IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q by
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M; rw [hf]; ext; simp) ▸
(IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q).toEquiv.bijective
end AlgEquiv
section liftAlgHom
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R}
{S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] [IsLocalization M S]
{f : R →ₐ[A] P} (hf : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (f y)) (x : S)
include hf
/-- `AlgHom` version of `IsLocalization.lift`. -/
noncomputable def liftAlgHom : S →ₐ[A] P where
__ := lift hf
commutes' r := show lift hf (algebraMap A S r) = _ by
simp [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S]
theorem liftAlgHom_toRingHom : (liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P).toRingHom = lift hf := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftAlgHom : ⇑(liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P) = lift hf := rfl
theorem liftAlgHom_apply : liftAlgHom hf x = lift hf x := rfl
end liftAlgHom
section AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*)
[CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S] [IsLocalization M S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] {T : Submonoid P} (Q : Type*)
[CommSemiring Q] [Algebra A Q] [Algebra P Q] [IsScalarTower A P Q] [IsLocalization T Q]
(h : R ≃ₐ[A] P) (H : Submonoid.map h M = T)
include H
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` and `P` at submonoids `M`, `T` respectively,
an isomorphism `h : R ≃ₐ[A] P` such that `h(M) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations
`S ≃ₐ[A] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquivOfAlgEquiv : S ≃ₐ[A] Q where
__ := ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q h.toRingEquiv H
commutes' _ := by dsimp; rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S, map_eq,
RingHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.commutes, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A P Q]
variable {S Q h}
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq_map :
(algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H : S →+* Q) =
map Q (h : R →+* P) (M.le_comap_of_map_le (le_of_eq H)) :=
rfl
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq (x : R) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H ((algebraMap R S) x) = algebraMap P Q (h x) := by
simp
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H (mk' S x y) =
mk' Q (h x) ⟨h y, show h y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem h y.2⟩ := by
simp [map_mk']
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_symm : (algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H).symm =
algEquivOfAlgEquiv Q S h.symm (show Submonoid.map h.symm T = M by
rw [← H, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv, AlgEquiv.symm_toMulEquiv,
← Submonoid.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv,
Submonoid.comap_map_eq_of_injective (h : R ≃* P).injective]) := rfl
end AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
section at_units
variable (R M)
/-- The localization at a module of units is isomorphic to the ring. -/
noncomputable def atUnits (H : M ≤ IsUnit.submonoid R) : R ≃ₐ[R] S := by
refine AlgEquiv.ofBijective (Algebra.ofId R S) ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro x y hxy
obtain ⟨c, eq⟩ := (IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp hxy
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H c.prop
rwa [← hu, Units.mul_right_inj] at eq
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, eq⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M y
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H s.prop
use x * u.inv
dsimp [Algebra.ofId, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_mks]
rw [RingHom.map_mul, ← eq, ← hu, mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
simp
end at_units
end IsLocalization
section
variable (M N)
theorem isLocalization_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization M S] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M P := by
constructor
· intro y
convert (IsLocalization.map_units S y).map h.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toMonoidHom
exact (h.commutes y).symm
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M (h.symm y)
apply_fun (show S → P from h) at e
simp only [map_mul, h.apply_symm_apply, h.commutes] at e
exact ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩
· intro x y
rw [← h.symm.toEquiv.injective.eq_iff, ← IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S, ← h.symm.commutes, ←
h.symm.commutes]
exact id
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization M P :=
⟨fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h, fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h.symm⟩
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (h : S ≃+* P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔
haveI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra; IsLocalization M P :=
letI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra
isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv M { h with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
variable (S) in
/-- If an algebra is simultaneously localizations for two submonoids, then an arbitrary algebra
is a localization of one submonoid iff it is a localization of the other. -/
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization [IsLocalization M S] [IsLocalization N S]
[Algebra R P] : IsLocalization M P ↔ IsLocalization N P :=
⟨fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv N (algEquiv M S P),
fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv M (algEquiv N S P)⟩
theorem iff_of_le_of_exists_dvd (N : Submonoid R) (h₁ : M ≤ N) (h₂ : ∀ n ∈ N, ∃ m ∈ M, n ∣ m) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization N S :=
have : IsLocalization N (Localization M) := of_le_of_exists_dvd _ _ h₁ h₂
isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization _ _ (Localization M)
end
variable (M)
/-- If `S₁` is the localization of `R` at `M₁` and `S₂` is the localization of
`R` at `M₂`, then every localization `T` of `S₂` at `M₁` is also a localization of
`S₁` at `M₂`, in other words `M₁⁻¹M₂⁻¹R` can be identified with `M₂⁻¹M₁⁻¹R`. -/
lemma commutes (S₁ S₂ T : Type*) [CommSemiring S₁]
[CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R S₁] [Algebra R S₂] [Algebra R T] [Algebra S₁ T]
[Algebra S₂ T] [IsScalarTower R S₁ T] [IsScalarTower R S₂ T] (M₁ M₂ : Submonoid R)
[IsLocalization M₁ S₁] [IsLocalization M₂ S₂]
[IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) T] :
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₁ M₂) T where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨m, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
exact IsUnit.map _ (IsLocalization.map_units' ⟨a, ha⟩)
surj' a := by
obtain ⟨⟨y, -, m, hm, rfl⟩, hy⟩ := surj (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) a
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₁ T] at hy
obtain ⟨⟨z, n, hn⟩, hz⟩ := IsLocalization.surj (M := M₂) y
have hunit : IsUnit (algebraMap R S₁ m) := map_units' ⟨m, hm⟩
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ z * hunit.unit⁻¹, ⟨algebraMap R S₁ n, n, hn, rfl⟩⟩
rw [map_mul, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
conv_rhs => rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T, ← hz, map_mul, ← hy]
convert_to _ = a * (algebraMap S₂ T) ((algebraMap R S₂) n) *
(algebraMap S₁ T) (((algebraMap R S₁) m) * hunit.unit⁻¹.val)
· rw [map_mul]
ring
simp
exists_of_eq {x y} hxy := by
obtain ⟨r, s, d, hr, hs⟩ := IsLocalization.surj₂ M₁ S₁ x y
apply_fun (· * algebraMap S₁ T (algebraMap R S₁ d)) at hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul, hr, hs, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T] at hxy
obtain ⟨⟨-, c, hmc, rfl⟩, hc⟩ := exists_of_eq (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul] at hc
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := IsLocalization.exists_of_eq (M := M₂) hc
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ a, a, a.property, rfl⟩
apply (map_units S₁ d).mul_right_cancel
rw [mul_assoc, hr, mul_assoc, hs]
apply (map_units S₁ ⟨c, hmc⟩).mul_right_cancel
rw [← map_mul, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ c, ha, map_mul, map_mul]
ring
end IsLocalization
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
theorem mk_natCast (m : ℕ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℕ) _
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
variable (S) (M)
/-- The localization of `R` at `M` as a quotient type is isomorphic to any other localization. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : Localization M ≃ₐ[R] S :=
IsLocalization.algEquiv M _ _
/-- The localization of a singleton is a singleton. Cannot be an instance due to metavariables. -/
noncomputable def _root_.IsLocalization.unique (R Rₘ) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring Rₘ]
(M : Submonoid R) [Subsingleton R] [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] : Unique Rₘ :=
have : Inhabited Rₘ := ⟨1⟩
(algEquiv M Rₘ).symm.injective.unique
end
nonrec theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S (mk' (Localization M) x y) = mk' S x y :=
algEquiv_mk' _ _
nonrec theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
(algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk' (Localization M) x y :=
algEquiv_symm_mk' _ _
theorem algEquiv_mk (x y) : algEquiv M S (mk x y) = mk' S x y := by rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_mk']
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk x y := by
rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_symm_mk']
lemma coe_algEquiv :
(Localization.algEquiv M S : Localization M →+* S) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
lemma coe_algEquiv_symm :
((Localization.algEquiv M S).symm : S →+* Localization M) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
end Localization
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
namespace Localization
theorem mk_intCast (m : ℤ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℤ) _
end Localization
open IsLocalization
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem IsField.localization_map_bijective {R Rₘ : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing Rₘ]
{M : Submonoid R} (hM : (0 : R) ∉ M) (hR : IsField R) [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap R Rₘ) := by
letI := hR.toField
replace hM := le_nonZeroDivisors_of_noZeroDivisors hM
refine ⟨IsLocalization.injective _ hM, fun x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨r, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M x
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero <| hM hm)
exact ⟨r * n, by rw [eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, _root_.mul_comm n, hn, mul_one]⟩
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem Field.localization_map_bijective {K Kₘ : Type*} [Field K] [CommRing Kₘ] {M : Submonoid K}
(hM : (0 : K) ∉ M) [Algebra K Kₘ] [IsLocalization M Kₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap K Kₘ) :=
(Field.toIsField K).localization_map_bijective hM
-- this looks weird due to the `letI` inside the above lemma, but trying to do it the other
-- way round causes issues with defeq of instances, so this is actually easier.
section Algebra
variable {S} {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ]
| variable [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ]
variable [Algebra S Sₘ] [i : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
include S
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean | 438 | 440 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Measurable parametric Stieltjes functions
We provide tools to build a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at
+∞ for all `a : α` from a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ`. These measurable parametric Stieltjes
functions are cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of transition kernels.
The reason for going through `ℚ` instead of defining directly a Stieltjes function is that since
`ℚ` is countable, building a measurable function is easier and we can obtain properties of the
form `∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ∀ (q : ℚ), ...` (for some measure `μ` on `α`) by proving the weaker
`∀ (q : ℚ), ∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ...`.
This construction will be possible if `f a : ℚ → ℝ` satisfies a package of properties for all `a`:
monotonicity, limits at +-∞ and a continuity property. We define `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` to state
that this is the case at `a` and define the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF f` that `f` is measurable
and `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` for all `a`.
The function `α → StieltjesFunction` obtained by extending `f` by continuity from the right is then
called `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
In applications, we will often only have `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost surely with respect to
some measure. In order to turn that almost everywhere property into an everywhere property we define
`toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) := fun a q ↦ if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a q else defaultRatCDF q`,
which satisfies the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f)`.
Finally, we define `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`, composition of `toRatCDF` and
`IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
## Main definitions
* `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`: turn a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into a measurable
function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
/-- A measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ gives a measurable
function `α → Measure ℝ` by taking `StieltjesFunction.measure` at each point. -/
lemma StieltjesFunction.measurable_measure {α : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → StieltjesFunction} (hf : ∀ q, Measurable fun a ↦ f a q)
(hf_bot : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0))
(hf_top : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)) :
Measurable fun a ↦ (f a).measure :=
have : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (f a).measure :=
fun a ↦ (f a).isProbabilityMeasure (hf_bot a) (hf_top a)
.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic ℝ) isPiSystem_Iic <| by
simp_rw [forall_mem_range, StieltjesFunction.measure_Iic (f _) (hf_bot _), sub_zero]
exact fun _ ↦ (hf _).ennreal_ofReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α : Type*}
section IsMeasurableRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
/-- `a : α` is a Stieltjes point for `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` if `f a` is monotone with limit 0 at -∞
and 1 at +∞ and satisfies a continuity property. -/
structure IsRatStieltjesPoint (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) : Prop where
mono : Monotone (f a)
tendsto_atTop_one : Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)
tendsto_atBot_zero : Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)
iInf_rat_gt_eq : ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun p : Unit × α ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
↔ IsRatStieltjesPoint f a := by
constructor <;>
exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one, h.tendsto_atBot_zero, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
lemma measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a} := by
have h1 : MeasurableSet {a | Monotone (f a)} := by
change MeasurableSet {a | ∀ q r (_ : q ≤ r), f a q ≤ f a r}
simp_rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_le hf.eval hf.eval
have h2 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h3 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h4 : MeasurableSet {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t} := by
rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_eq_fun (.iInf fun _ ↦ hf.eval) hf.eval
suffices {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a}
= ({a | Monotone (f a)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)}
∩ {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t}) by
rw [this]
exact (((h1.inter h2).inter h3).inter h4)
ext a
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· exact ⟨⟨⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one⟩, h.tendsto_atBot_zero⟩, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
· exact ⟨h.1.1.1, h.1.1.2, h.1.2, h.2⟩
lemma IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite {f g : α → ℚ → ℝ} {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(hf : p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (hg : ¬ p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint g a) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun a ↦ if p a then f a else g a) a where
mono := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).mono, (hg h).mono]
tendsto_atTop_one := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atTop_one, (hg h).tendsto_atTop_one]
tendsto_atBot_zero := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atBot_zero, (hg h).tendsto_atBot_zero]
iInf_rat_gt_eq := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).iInf_rat_gt_eq, (hg h).iInf_rat_gt_eq]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- A function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` is a (kernel) rational cumulative distribution function if it is
measurable in the first argument and if `f a` satisfies a list of properties for all `a : α`:
monotonicity between 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ and a form of continuity.
A function with these properties can be extended to a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
-/
structure IsMeasurableRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : Prop where
isRatStieltjesPoint : ∀ a, IsRatStieltjesPoint f a
measurable : Measurable f
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.nonneg {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
0 ≤ f a q :=
Monotone.le_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.le_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
f a q ≤ 1 :=
Monotone.ge_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atTop_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atBot_zero {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.iInf_rat_gt_eq {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α)
(q : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi q, f a r = f a q := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).iInf_rat_gt_eq q
end IsMeasurableRatCDF
section DefaultRatCDF
/-- A function with the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF`.
Used in a piecewise construction to convert a function which only satisfies the properties
defining `IsMeasurableRatCDF` on some set into a true `IsMeasurableRatCDF`. -/
def defaultRatCDF (q : ℚ) := if q < 0 then (0 : ℝ) else 1
lemma monotone_defaultRatCDF : Monotone defaultRatCDF := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
intro x y hxy
dsimp only
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one, absurd (hxy.trans_lt h_2) h_1, le_rfl]
lemma defaultRatCDF_nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ defaultRatCDF q := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
lemma defaultRatCDF_le_one (q : ℚ) : defaultRatCDF q ≤ 1 := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨0, fun q hq => (if_neg (not_lt.mpr hq)).symm⟩
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atBot (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atBot]
refine ⟨-1, fun q hq => (if_pos (hq.trans_lt ?_)).symm⟩
linarith
lemma iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF (t : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi t, defaultRatCDF r = defaultRatCDF t := by
simp only [defaultRatCDF]
have h_bdd : BddBelow (range fun r : ↥(Ioi t) ↦ ite ((r : ℚ) < 0) (0 : ℝ) 1) := by
refine ⟨0, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hx
dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
split_ifs with h
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨q, htq, hq_neg⟩ : ∃ q, t < q ∧ q < 0 := ⟨t / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨q, htq⟩).trans ?_
rw [if_pos]
rwa [Subtype.coe_mk]
· split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨t + 1, lt_add_one t⟩).trans ?_
split_ifs
exacts [zero_le_one, le_rfl]
· refine le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_
rw [if_neg]
rw [not_lt] at h ⊢
exact h.trans (mem_Ioi.mp x.prop).le
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun (_ : α) ↦ defaultRatCDF) a where
mono := monotone_defaultRatCDF
tendsto_atTop_one := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop
tendsto_atBot_zero := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot
iInf_rat_gt_eq := iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF_defaultRatCDF (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsMeasurableRatCDF (fun (_ : α) (q : ℚ) ↦ defaultRatCDF q) where
isRatStieltjesPoint := isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF
measurable := measurable_const
end DefaultRatCDF
section ToRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Turn a function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into another with the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a`
everywhere. At `a` that does not satisfy that property, `f a` is replaced by an arbitrary suitable
function.
Mainly useful when `f` satisfies the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost everywhere with
respect to some measure. -/
noncomputable
def toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : α → ℚ → ℝ := fun a ↦
if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a else defaultRatCDF
lemma toRatCDF_of_isRatStieltjesPoint {a : α} (h : IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (q : ℚ) :
toRatCDF f a q = f a q := by
rw [toRatCDF, if_pos h]
lemma toRatCDF_unit_prod (a : α) :
toRatCDF (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) ((), a) = toRatCDF f a := by
unfold toRatCDF
rw [isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
lemma measurable_toRatCDF (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable (toRatCDF f) :=
Measurable.ite (measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint hf) hf measurable_const
lemma isMeasurableRatCDF_toRatCDF (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f) where
isRatStieltjesPoint a := by
classical
exact IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite (IsRatStieltjesPoint f) id
(fun _ ↦ isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF a)
measurable := measurable_toRatCDF hf
end ToRatCDF
section IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction
/-- Auxiliary definition for `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`: turn `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into
a function `α → ℝ → ℝ` by assigning to `f a x` the infimum of `f a q` over `q : ℚ` with `x < q`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) :
α → ℝ → ℝ :=
fun a x ↦ ⨅ q : { q' : ℚ // x < q' }, f a q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def' (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a
= fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // t < r' }, f a r := by
ext t; exact IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def f a t
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_unit_prod {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (a : α) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
= IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a := by
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def']
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f)
include hf
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_eq (a : α) (r : ℚ) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a r = f a r := by
rw [← hf.iInf_rat_gt_eq a r, IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux]
refine Equiv.iInf_congr ?_ ?_
· exact
{ toFun := fun t ↦ ⟨t.1, mod_cast t.2⟩
invFun := fun t ↦ ⟨t.1, mod_cast t.2⟩
left_inv := fun t ↦ by simp only [Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun t ↦ by simp only [Subtype.coe_eta] }
· intro t
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg (a : α) (r : ℝ) :
0 ≤ IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a r := by
have : Nonempty { r' : ℚ // r < ↑r' } := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt r
exact ⟨⟨r, hrx⟩⟩
rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
exact le_ciInf fun r' ↦ hf.nonneg a _
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux (a : α) :
Monotone (IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a) := by
intro x y hxy
have : Nonempty { r' : ℚ // y < ↑r' } := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt y
exact ⟨⟨r, hrx⟩⟩
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
refine le_ciInf fun r ↦ (ciInf_le ?_ ?_).trans_eq ?_
· refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩; rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩; exact hf.nonneg a _
· exact ⟨r.1, hxy.trans_lt r.prop⟩
· rfl
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.continuousWithinAt_stieltjesFunctionAux_Ici (a : α) (x : ℝ) :
ContinuousWithinAt (IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a) (Ici x) x := by
rw [← continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici]
convert Monotone.tendsto_nhdsGT (monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a) x
rw [sInf_image']
have h' : ⨅ r : Ioi x, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r
= ⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r := by
refine Real.iInf_Ioi_eq_iInf_rat_gt x ?_ (monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a)
refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩
rintro ⟨u, -, rfl⟩
exact stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg hf a u
have h'' :
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r =
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, f a r := by
congr with r
exact stieltjesFunctionAux_eq hf a r
rw [h', h'', ContinuousWithinAt]
congr!
rw [stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
/-- Extend a function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` with property `IsMeasurableRatCDF` from `ℚ` to `ℝ`,
to a function `α → StieltjesFunction`. -/
noncomputable def IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction (a : α) : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := stieltjesFunctionAux f a
mono' := monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a
right_continuous' x := continuousWithinAt_stieltjesFunctionAux_Ici hf a x
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_eq (a : α) (r : ℚ) : hf.stieltjesFunction a r = f a r :=
stieltjesFunctionAux_eq hf a r
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_nonneg (a : α) (r : ℝ) : 0 ≤ hf.stieltjesFunction a r :=
stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg hf a r
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_le_one (a : α) (x : ℝ) :
hf.stieltjesFunction a x ≤ 1 := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt x
rw [← StieltjesFunction.iInf_rat_gt_eq]
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_eq]
refine ciInf_le_of_le ?_ ?_ (hf.le_one _ _)
· refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩; rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩; exact hf.nonneg a _
· exact ⟨r, hrx⟩
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atBot (a : α) :
Tendsto (hf.stieltjesFunction a) atBot (𝓝 0) := by
have h_exists : ∀ x : ℝ, ∃ q : ℚ, x < q ∧ ↑q < x + 1 := fun x ↦ exists_rat_btwn (lt_add_one x)
let qs : ℝ → ℚ := fun x ↦ (h_exists x).choose
have hqs_tendsto : Tendsto qs atBot atBot := by
rw [tendsto_atBot_atBot]
refine fun q ↦ ⟨q - 1, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have h_le : ↑(qs y) ≤ (q : ℝ) - 1 + 1 :=
(h_exists y).choose_spec.2.le.trans (add_le_add hy le_rfl)
rw [sub_add_cancel] at h_le
exact mod_cast h_le
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
((hf.tendsto_atBot_zero a).comp hqs_tendsto) (stieltjesFunction_nonneg hf a) fun x ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, ← stieltjesFunction_eq hf]
exact (hf.stieltjesFunction a).mono (h_exists x).choose_spec.1.le
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atTop (a : α) :
Tendsto (hf.stieltjesFunction a) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
have h_exists : ∀ x : ℝ, ∃ q : ℚ, x - 1 < q ∧ ↑q < x := fun x ↦ exists_rat_btwn (sub_one_lt x)
let qs : ℝ → ℚ := fun x ↦ (h_exists x).choose
have hqs_tendsto : Tendsto qs atTop atTop := by
rw [tendsto_atTop_atTop]
refine fun q ↦ ⟨q + 1, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have h_le : y - 1 ≤ qs y := (h_exists y).choose_spec.1.le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add] at h_le
exact_mod_cast le_of_add_le_add_right (hy.trans h_le)
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le ((hf.tendsto_atTop_one a).comp hqs_tendsto)
tendsto_const_nhds ?_ (stieltjesFunction_le_one hf a)
intro x
rw [Function.comp_apply, ← stieltjesFunction_eq hf]
exact (hf.stieltjesFunction a).mono (le_of_lt (h_exists x).choose_spec.2)
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.measurable_stieltjesFunction (x : ℝ) :
Measurable fun a ↦ hf.stieltjesFunction a x := by
have : (fun a ↦ hf.stieltjesFunction a x) = fun a ↦ ⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, f a ↑r := by
ext1 a
rw [← StieltjesFunction.iInf_rat_gt_eq]
congr with q
rw [stieltjesFunction_eq]
rw [this]
exact .iInf (fun q ↦ hf.measurable.eval)
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stronglyMeasurable_stieltjesFunction (x : ℝ) :
StronglyMeasurable fun a ↦ hf.stieltjesFunction a x :=
(measurable_stieltjesFunction hf x).stronglyMeasurable
section Measure
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.measure_stieltjesFunction_Iic (a : α) (x : ℝ) :
(hf.stieltjesFunction a).measure (Iic x) = ENNReal.ofReal (hf.stieltjesFunction a x) := by
rw [← sub_zero (hf.stieltjesFunction a x)]
exact (hf.stieltjesFunction a).measure_Iic (tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atBot hf a) _
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.measure_stieltjesFunction_univ (a : α) :
(hf.stieltjesFunction a).measure univ = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_one, ← sub_zero (1 : ℝ)]
exact StieltjesFunction.measure_univ _ (tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atBot hf a)
(tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atTop hf a)
instance IsMeasurableRatCDF.instIsProbabilityMeasure_stieltjesFunction (a : α) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (hf.stieltjesFunction a).measure :=
⟨measure_stieltjesFunction_univ hf a⟩
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.measurable_measure_stieltjesFunction :
Measurable fun a ↦ (hf.stieltjesFunction a).measure := by
apply_rules [StieltjesFunction.measurable_measure, measurable_stieltjesFunction,
tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atBot, tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atTop]
end Measure
end IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction
section stieltjesOfMeasurableRat
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Turn a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
Composition of `toRatCDF` and `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`. -/
noncomputable
def stieltjesOfMeasurableRat (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (hf : Measurable f) : α → StieltjesFunction :=
(isMeasurableRatCDF_toRatCDF hf).stieltjesFunction
lemma stieltjesOfMeasurableRat_eq (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) (r : ℚ) :
stieltjesOfMeasurableRat f hf a r = toRatCDF f a r :=
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_eq _ a r
lemma stieltjesOfMeasurableRat_unit_prod (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
stieltjesOfMeasurableRat (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) (hf.comp measurable_snd) ((), a)
| = stieltjesOfMeasurableRat f hf a := by
simp_rw [stieltjesOfMeasurableRat,IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction,
← IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_unit_prod a]
congr with x
congr 1 with p : 1
cases p with
| mk _ b => rw [← toRatCDF_unit_prod b]
lemma stieltjesOfMeasurableRat_nonneg (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) (r : ℝ) :
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/MeasurableStieltjes.lean | 451 | 459 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
/-!
# Pullbacks and pushouts in the category of topological spaces
-/
open TopologicalSpace Topology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
/-- The first projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
/-- The second projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
/-- The explicit pullback cone of `X, Y` given by `{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }`. -/
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
simpa)
/-- The constructed cone is a limit. -/
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact ofHom
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop }
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· intro m h₁ h₂
ext x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be `ext x`.
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
/-- The pullback of two maps can be identified as a subspace of `X × Y`. -/
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.fst f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.snd f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ↑(pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨pullback.fst f g x, pullback.snd f g x⟩, by
simpa using CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst f g) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd f g) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.isInducing.eq_induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;>
-- This used to be `simp` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
aesop_cat
/-- The pullback along an embedding is (isomorphic to) the preimage. -/
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : IsEmbedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.injective
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_subtype_val.prodMk <| hg.isInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem isInducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsInducing <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨by simp [prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_pullback_to_prod := isInducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsEmbedding <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨isInducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_pullback_to_prod := isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod
/-- If the map `S ⟶ T` is mono, then there is a description of the image of `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`. -/
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩ (pullback.snd g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₁, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₂,
ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂,
← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, pullback.condition, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
· simp [hx₁, ← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl]
· simp [hx₁]
· simp [hx₂]
theorem pullback_fst_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.fst f g) = { x : X | ∃ y : Y, f x = g y } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
use pullback.snd f g y
exact CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition y
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
theorem pullback_snd_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.snd f g) = { y : Y | ∃ x : X, f x = g y } := by
ext y
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
use pullback.fst f g x
exact CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x
· rintro ⟨x, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
/-- If there is a diagram where the morphisms `W ⟶ Y` and `X ⟶ Z` are embeddings,
then the induced morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z` is also an embedding.
```
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
```
-/
theorem pullback_map_isEmbedding {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S)
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : IsEmbedding i₁)
(H₂ : IsEmbedding i₂) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
IsEmbedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine .of_comp (ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
(show Continuous (prod.lift (pullback.fst g₁ g₂) (pullback.snd g₁ g₂)) from
ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
?_
suffices
IsEmbedding (prod.lift (pullback.fst f₁ f₂) (pullback.snd f₁ f₂) ≫ Limits.prod.map i₁ i₂) by
simpa [← coe_comp] using this
rw [coe_comp]
exact (isEmbedding_prodMap H₁ H₂).comp (isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod _ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings := pullback_map_isEmbedding
/-- If there is a diagram where the morphisms `W ⟶ Y` and `X ⟶ Z` are open embeddings, and `S ⟶ T`
is mono, then the induced morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z` is also an open embedding.
```
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
```
-/
theorem pullback_map_isOpenEmbedding {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S)
(f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : IsOpenEmbedding i₁)
(H₂ : IsOpenEmbedding i₂) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : IsOpenEmbedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
constructor
· apply
pullback_map_isEmbedding f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ H₁.isEmbedding H₂.isEmbedding i₃ eq₁ eq₂
· rw [range_pullback_map]
apply IsOpen.inter <;> apply Continuous.isOpen_preimage
· apply ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun
· exact H₁.isOpen_range
· apply ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun
· exact H₂.isOpen_range
lemma snd_isEmbedding_of_left {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} (H : IsEmbedding f) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
IsEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.snd f g) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.snd (𝟙 S) g))).isEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_isEmbedding (i₂ := 𝟙 Y)
f g (𝟙 S) g H (homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).isEmbedding (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
simp [homeoOfIso, ← coe_comp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias snd_embedding_of_left_embedding := snd_isEmbedding_of_left
theorem fst_isEmbedding_of_right {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H : IsEmbedding g) : IsEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.fst f g) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.fst f (𝟙 S)))).isEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_isEmbedding (i₁ := 𝟙 X)
f g f (𝟙 _) (homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).isEmbedding H (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
simp [homeoOfIso, ← coe_comp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias fst_embedding_of_right_embedding := fst_isEmbedding_of_right
theorem isEmbedding_of_pullback {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} {g : Y ⟶ S} (H₁ : IsEmbedding f)
(H₂ : IsEmbedding g) : IsEmbedding (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
convert H₂.comp (snd_isEmbedding_of_left H₁ g)
rw [← coe_comp, ← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inr]
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_of_pullback_embeddings := isEmbedding_of_pullback
theorem snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} (H : IsOpenEmbedding f)
(g : Y ⟶ S) : IsOpenEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.snd f g) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.snd (𝟙 S) g))).isOpenEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_isOpenEmbedding (i₂ := 𝟙 Y) f g (𝟙 _) g H
(homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).isOpenEmbedding (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
simp [homeoOfIso, ← coe_comp]
theorem fst_isOpenEmbedding_of_right {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H : IsOpenEmbedding g) : IsOpenEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.fst f g) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.fst f (𝟙 S)))).isOpenEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_isOpenEmbedding (i₁ := 𝟙 X) f g f (𝟙 _)
(homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).isOpenEmbedding H (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
simp [homeoOfIso, ← coe_comp]
/-- If `X ⟶ S`, `Y ⟶ S` are open embeddings, then so is `X ×ₛ Y ⟶ S`. -/
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_pullback {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H₁ : IsOpenEmbedding f) (H₂ : IsOpenEmbedding g) :
IsOpenEmbedding (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
convert H₂.comp (snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left H₁ g)
rw [← coe_comp, ← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inr]
| rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias isOpenEmbedding_of_pullback_open_embeddings := isOpenEmbedding_of_pullback
theorem fst_iso_of_right_embedding_range_subset {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) {g : Y ⟶ S}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) (H : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 331 | 337 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.oangle`, with notation `∡`, is the oriented angle determined by three
points.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- A fixed choice of positive orientation of Euclidean space `ℝ²` -/
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The oriented angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and `p₃`, modulo `2 * π`. If
either of those points equals `p₂`, this is 0. See `EuclideanGeometry.angle` for the
corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when neither end point equals the middle point. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
unfold oangle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
/-- The angle ∡AAB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABA at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the last two points are not equal.
-/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Reversing the order of the points passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
/-- Adding an angle to that with the order of the points reversed results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
/-- An oriented angle is zero if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- An oriented angle is `π` if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
`π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- An oriented angle is not zero or `π` if and only if the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3))]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
/-- An oriented angle is zero or `π` if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
/-- An oriented angle has a sign zero if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is affinely
independent if and only if the other is. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is collinear
if and only if the other is. -/
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
/-- If corresponding pairs of points in two angles have the same vector span, twice those angles
are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- If the lines determined by corresponding pairs of points in two angles are parallel, twice
those angles are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the second at `p` plus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the second and the third at `p` plus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, adding the angles between them at `p` in cyclic order
results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` equals that of the
unoriented angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is plus or minus the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is the absolute value of the
oriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle at `p` between two points is zero, either one of the points
equals `p` or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
/-- If the signs of two nondegenerate oriented angles between points are equal, the oriented
angles are equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals the unoriented angle if the sign is
positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is zero if and only if the
unoriented angle is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle between three points is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle
(reversed). -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle is `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle (reversed) is
`π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- Swapping the first and second points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
/-- Swapping the first and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
/-- Swapping the second and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- Rotating the points in an oriented angle does not change the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- The oriented angle between three points is π if and only if the second point is strictly
between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point (reversed) is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between three points is zero if and only if one of the first and third
points is weakly between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₁) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_left]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₃ p₂) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₃ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_right
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₃) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_right]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
{p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi, oangle_add_swap h.left_ne h.right_ne hp₃p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
{p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi, oangle_add hp₁p₂ h.right_ne h.left_ne]
/-- Replacing both the first and third points by ones on the same lines but the opposite rays
does not change the oriented angle (vertically opposite angles). -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h₁ : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁')
(h₃ : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃' := by
rw [h₁.oangle_eq_add_pi_left h₃.left_ne, h₃.oangle_eq_add_pi_right h₁.right_ne, add_assoc,
Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, add_zero]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁'} : Set P)) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁'p₂ : p₁' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rcases h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw with (hw | hw | hw)
· have hw' : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁' := ⟨hw, hp₁p₂.symm, hp₁'p₂.symm⟩
rw [hw'.oangle_eq_add_pi_left hp₃p₂, smul_add, Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi, add_zero]
· rw [hw.oangle_eq_left hp₁'p₂]
· rw [hw.symm.oangle_eq_left hp₁p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₃, p₂, p₃'} : Set P)) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) (hp₃'p₂ : p₃' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by
rw [oangle_rev, smul_neg, h.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂ hp₃'p₂, ← smul_neg, ← oangle_rev]
/-- Two different points are equidistant from a third point if and only if that third point
equals some multiple of a `π / 2` rotation of the vector between those points, plus the midpoint
of those points. -/
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint {p₁ p₂ p : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p = dist p₂ p ↔
∃ r : ℝ, r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = p := by
refine ⟨fun hd => ?_, fun hr => ?_⟩
· have hi : ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, p -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, ←
mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm] at hd
simp_rw [vsub_midpoint, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₁ p, inner_sub_left, inner_add_right,
inner_smul_right, hd, real_inner_comm (p -ᵥ p₁)]
abel
rw [@Orientation.inner_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two V _ _ _ o,
or_iff_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 h.symm)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [eq_comm, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hr
exact ⟨r, hr.symm⟩
· rcases hr with ⟨r, rfl⟩
simp_rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, left_vsub_midpoint, right_vsub_midpoint,
invOf_eq_inv, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, ← mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_sub_self]
simp [-neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
open AffineSubspace
/-- Given two pairs of distinct points on the same line, such that the vectors between those
pairs of points are on the same ray (oriented in the same direction on that line), and a fifth
point, the angles at the fifth point between each of those two pairs of points have the same
sign. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (p₅ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) (hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P))
(hr : SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) (p₄ -ᵥ p₃)) : (∡ p₁ p₅ p₂).sign = (∡ p₃ p₅ p₄).sign := by
by_cases hc₅₁₂ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂} : Set P)
· have hc₅₁₂₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)) hp₁p₂).2 hc₅₁₂
have hc₅₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _
(Set.mem_singleton _)))) hp₃p₄).1 hc₅₁₂₃₄
rw [Set.insert_comm] at hc₅₁₂ hc₅₃₄
have hs₁₅₂ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₁₂
have hs₃₅₄ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₃₄
rw [← Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at hs₁₅₂ hs₃₅₄
rw [hs₁₅₂, hs₃₅₄]
· let s : Set (P × P × P) :=
(fun x : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] × V => (x.1, p₅, x.2 +ᵥ (x.1 : P))) ''
Set.univ ×ˢ {v | SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) v ∧ v ≠ 0}
have hco : IsConnected s :=
haveI : ConnectedSpace line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] := AddTorsor.connectedSpace _ _
(isConnected_univ.prod (isConnected_setOf_sameRay_and_ne_zero
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm))).image _ (by fun_prop)
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) s := by
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_univ, true_and, Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, -⟩ := hv
rintro rfl
refine hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan ?_).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))
· exact hq
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ s → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, hv0⟩ := hv
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
change q ∈ line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] at hq
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
refine affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem ?_ hq
(fun h => hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan h).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))) ?_
· rwa [← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub, neg_ne_zero]
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hp₁p₂s : (p₁, p₅, p₂) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₁, left_mem_affineSpan_pair ℝ _ _⟩, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟩,
⟨SameRay.rfl, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
have hp₃p₄s : (p₃, p₅, p₄) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₃, hc.mem_affineSpan_of_mem_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))) hp₁p₂⟩, p₄ -ᵥ p₃⟩,
⟨hr, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃p₄.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hco hf hsp hp₃p₄s hp₁p₂s
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the first and second or second and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by simpa using h.wbtw.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ h.left_ne h.ne_right h.wbtw.sameRay_vsub
/-- Given three points in weak order on the same line, with the first not equal to the second,
and a fourth point, the angles at the fourth point between the first and second or first and
third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₁ ≠ p₂) : (∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁, p₃} : Set P) := by
simpa [Set.insert_comm p₂] using h.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ hne (h.left_ne_right_of_ne_left hne.symm) h.sameRay_vsub_left
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the first and second or first and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ h.left_ne
/-- Given three points in weak order on the same line, with the second not equal to the third,
and a fourth point, the angles at the fourth point between the second and third or first and
third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₂ ≠ p₃) : (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign := by
simp_rw [oangle_rev p₃, Real.Angle.sign_neg, h.symm.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ hne.symm]
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the second and third or first and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right _ h.ne_right
/-- Given two points in an affine subspace, the angles between those two points at two other
points on the same side of that subspace have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SSameSide.oangle_sign_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SSameSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
let sp : Set (P × P × P) := (fun p : P => (p₁, p, p₂)) '' {p | s.SSameSide p₃ p}
have hc : IsConnected sp :=
(isConnected_setOf_sSameSide hp₃p₄.2.1 hp₃p₄.nonempty).image _ (by fun_prop)
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) sp := by
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rintro rfl
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₁
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ sp → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
exact affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem h hp₁ hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hp₃ : (p₁, p₃, p₂) ∈ sp :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (sSameSide_self_iff.2 ⟨hp₃p₄.nonempty, hp₃p₄.2.1⟩)
have hp₄ : (p₁, p₄, p₂) ∈ sp := Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hp₃p₄
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hc hf hsp hp₃ hp₄
/-- Given two points in an affine subspace, the angles between those two points at two other
points on opposite sides of that subspace have opposite signs. -/
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SOppSide.oangle_sign_eq_neg {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SOppSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = -(∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
have hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by rintro rfl; exact hp₃p₄.left_not_mem hp₁
rw [← (hp₃p₄.symm.trans (sOppSide_pointReflection hp₁ hp₃p₄.left_not_mem)).oangle_sign_eq hp₁ hp₂,
← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, ← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, oangle_swap₁₃_sign,
(sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne ℝ hp₁p₃).symm.oangle_sign_eq _]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 768 | 771 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Init
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.StacksAttribute
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
/-!
# Categories
Defines a category, as a type class parametrised by the type of objects.
## Notations
Introduces notations in the `CategoryTheory` scope
* `X ⟶ Y` for the morphism spaces (type as `\hom`),
* `𝟙 X` for the identity morphism on `X` (type as `\b1`),
* `f ≫ g` for composition in the 'arrows' convention (type as `\gg`).
Users may like to add `g ⊚ f` for composition in the standard convention, using
```lean
local notation:80 g " ⊚ " f:80 => CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct.comp f g -- type as \oo
```
-/
library_note "CategoryTheory universes"
/--
The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C : Type u`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are independent, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`.
Typically any concrete example will either be a `SmallCategory`, where `v = u`,
which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type u} [SmallCategory C]
```
or a `LargeCategory`, where `u = v+1`, which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type (u+1)} [LargeCategory C]
```
In order for the library to handle these cases uniformly,
we generally work with the unconstrained `Category.{v u}`,
for which objects live in `Type u` and morphisms live in `Type v`.
Because the universe parameter `u` for the objects can be inferred from `C`
when we write `Category C`, while the universe parameter `v` for the morphisms
can not be automatically inferred, through the category theory library
we introduce universe parameters with morphism levels listed first,
as in
```
universe v u
```
or
```
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
```
when multiple independent universes are needed.
This has the effect that we can simply write `Category.{v} C`
(that is, only specifying a single parameter) while `u` will be inferred.
Often, however, it's not even necessary to include the `.{v}`.
(Although it was in earlier versions of Lean.)
If it is omitted a "free" universe will be used.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A preliminary structure on the way to defining a category,
containing the data, but none of the axioms. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
class CategoryStruct (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends Quiver.{v + 1} obj where
/-- The identity morphism on an object. -/
id : ∀ X : obj, Hom X X
/-- Composition of morphisms in a category, written `f ≫ g`. -/
comp : ∀ {X Y Z : obj}, (X ⟶ Y) → (Y ⟶ Z) → (X ⟶ Z)
initialize_simps_projections CategoryStruct (-toQuiver_Hom)
/-- Notation for the identity morphism in a category. -/
scoped notation "𝟙" => CategoryStruct.id -- type as \b1
/-- Notation for composition of morphisms in a category. -/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫ " => CategoryStruct.comp -- type as \gg
/-- Close the main goal with `sorry` if its type contains `sorry`, and fail otherwise. -/
syntax (name := sorryIfSorry) "sorry_if_sorry" : tactic
open Lean Meta Elab.Tactic in
@[tactic sorryIfSorry, inherit_doc sorryIfSorry] def evalSorryIfSorry : Tactic := fun _ => do
let goalType ← getMainTarget
if goalType.hasSorry then
closeMainGoal `sorry_if_sorry (← mkSorry goalType true)
else
throwError "The goal does not contain `sorry`"
/--
`rfl_cat` is a macro for `intros; rfl` which is attempted in `aesop_cat` before
doing the more expensive `aesop` tactic.
This gives a speedup because `simp` (called by `aesop`) is too slow.
There is a fix for this slowness in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7428.
So, when that is resolved, the performance impact of `rfl_cat` should be measured again.
Implementation notes:
* `refine id ?_`:
In some cases it is important that the type of the proof matches the expected type exactly.
e.g. if the goal is `2 = 1 + 1`, the `rfl` tactic will give a proof of type `2 = 2`.
Starting a proof with `refine id ?_` is a trick to make sure that the proof has exactly
the expected type, in this case `2 = 1 + 1`. See also https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/changing.20a.20proof.20can.20break.20a.20later.20proof
* `apply_rfl`:
`rfl` is a macro that attempts both `eq_refl` and `apply_rfl`. Since `apply_rfl`
subsumes `eq_refl`, we can use `apply_rfl` instead. This fails twice as fast as `rfl`.
-/
macro (name := rfl_cat) "rfl_cat" : tactic => do `(tactic| (refine id ?_; intros; apply_rfl))
/--
A thin wrapper for `aesop` which adds the `CategoryTheory` rule set and
allows `aesop` to look through semireducible definitions when calling `intros`.
This tactic fails when it is unable to solve the goal, making it suitable for
use in auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat) "aesop_cat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | rfl_cat |
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
We also use `aesop_cat?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_cat`
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat?) "aesop_cat?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | try_this rfl_cat |
aesop? $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_cat` which does not fail when it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal `aesop` is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat_nonterminal) "aesop_cat_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Subsingleton.elim
/-- The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are unconstrained, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`. (See also `LargeCategory` and `SmallCategory`.) -/
@[pp_with_univ, stacks 0014]
class Category (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends CategoryStruct.{v} obj where
/-- Identity morphisms are left identities for composition. -/
id_comp : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Identity morphisms are right identities for composition. -/
comp_id : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition in a category is associative. -/
assoc : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z), (f ≫ g) ≫ h = f ≫ g ≫ h := by
aesop_cat
attribute [simp] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id Category.assoc
attribute [trans] CategoryStruct.comp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by simp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by simp
/-- A `LargeCategory` has objects in one universe level higher than the universe level of
the morphisms. It is useful for examples such as the category of types, or the category
of groups, etc.
-/
abbrev LargeCategory (C : Type (u + 1)) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
/-- A `SmallCategory` has objects and morphisms in the same universe level.
-/
abbrev SmallCategory (C : Type u) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
section
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
initialize_simps_projections Category (-Hom)
/-- postcompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem eq_whisker {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f = g) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ h = g ≫ h := by rw [w]
/-- precompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem whisker_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : g = h) : f ≫ g = f ≫ h := by rw [w]
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the right).
If `f g : X ⟶ Y` and `w : f = g` and `h : Y ⟶ Z`, then `w =≫ h : f ≫ h = g ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " =≫ " => eq_whisker
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the left).
If `g h : Y ⟶ Z` and `w : g = h` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `f ≫= w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫= " => whisker_eq
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq {f g : Y ⟶ Z} (w : ∀ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq' (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : (fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => f ≫ h) = fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => g ≫ h) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_left_eq @fun Z h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w Z) h
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq' (f g : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : (fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ f) = fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ g) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_right_eq @fun X h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w X) h
theorem id_of_comp_left_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ g = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
theorem id_of_comp_right_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : Y ⟶ X), g ≫ f = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
theorem comp_ite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ if P then g else g') = if P then f ≫ g else f ≫ g' := by aesop
theorem ite_comp {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {X Y Z : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(if P then f else f') ≫ g = if P then f ≫ g else f' ≫ g := by aesop
theorem comp_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
(f ≫ if h : P then g h else g' h) = if h : P then f ≫ g h else f ≫ g' h := by aesop
theorem dite_comp {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ≫ g = if h : P then f h ≫ g else f' h ≫ g := by aesop
/-- A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if it can be cancelled when precomposed:
`f ≫ g = f ≫ h` implies `g = h`. -/
@[stacks 003B]
class Epi (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if it can be cancelled when precomposed. -/
left_cancellation : ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ g = f ≫ h → g = h
/-- A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if it can be cancelled when postcomposed:
`g ≫ f = h ≫ f` implies `g = h`. -/
@[stacks 003B]
class Mono (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if it can be cancelled when postcomposed. -/
right_cancellation : ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X), g ≫ f = h ≫ f → g = h
instance (X : C) : Epi (𝟙 X) :=
⟨fun g h w => by aesop⟩
instance (X : C) : Mono (𝟙 X) :=
⟨fun g h w => by aesop⟩
theorem cancel_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] {g h : Y ⟶ Z} : f ≫ g = f ≫ h ↔ g = h :=
⟨fun p => Epi.left_cancellation g h p, congr_arg _⟩
theorem cancel_epi_assoc_iff (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] {g h : Y ⟶ Z} {W : C} {k l : Z ⟶ W} :
(f ≫ g) ≫ k = (f ≫ h) ≫ l ↔ g ≫ k = h ≫ l :=
⟨fun p => (cancel_epi f).1 <| by simpa using p, fun p => by simp only [Category.assoc, p]⟩
theorem cancel_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] {g h : Z ⟶ X} : g ≫ f = h ≫ f ↔ g = h :=
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 we could just write `congr_arg _` here.
⟨fun p => Mono.right_cancellation g h p, congr_arg (fun k => k ≫ f)⟩
theorem cancel_mono_assoc_iff (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] {g h : Z ⟶ X} {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ Z} :
k ≫ (g ≫ f) = l ≫ (h ≫ f) ↔ k ≫ g = l ≫ h :=
⟨fun p => (cancel_mono f).1 <| by simpa using p, fun p => by simp only [← Category.assoc, p]⟩
theorem cancel_epi_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] {h : Y ⟶ Y} : f ≫ h = f ↔ h = 𝟙 Y := by
convert cancel_epi f
simp
theorem cancel_mono_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] {g : X ⟶ X} : g ≫ f = f ↔ g = 𝟙 X := by
convert cancel_mono f
simp
/-- The composition of epimorphisms is again an epimorphism. This version takes `Epi f` and `Epi g`
as typeclass arguments. For a version taking them as explicit arguments, see `epi_comp'`. -/
instance epi_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Epi g] : Epi (f ≫ g) :=
⟨fun _ _ w => (cancel_epi g).1 <| (cancel_epi_assoc_iff f).1 w⟩
/-- The composition of epimorphisms is again an epimorphism. This version takes `Epi f` and `Epi g`
as explicit arguments. For a version taking them as typeclass arguments, see `epi_comp`. -/
theorem epi_comp' {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (hf : Epi f) (hg : Epi g) : Epi (f ≫ g) :=
inferInstance
/-- The composition of monomorphisms is again a monomorphism. This version takes `Mono f` and
`Mono g` as typeclass arguments. For a version taking them as explicit arguments, see `mono_comp'`.
-/
instance mono_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] : Mono (f ≫ g) :=
⟨fun _ _ w => (cancel_mono f).1 <| (cancel_mono_assoc_iff g).1 w⟩
/-- The composition of monomorphisms is again a monomorphism. This version takes `Mono f` and
`Mono g` as explicit arguments. For a version taking them as typeclass arguments, see `mono_comp`.
-/
theorem mono_comp' {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (hf : Mono f) (hg : Mono g) :
Mono (f ≫ g) :=
inferInstance
theorem mono_of_mono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono (f ≫ g)] : Mono f :=
⟨fun _ _ w => (cancel_mono (f ≫ g)).1 <| by simp only [← Category.assoc, w]⟩
theorem mono_of_mono_fac {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [Mono h]
(w : f ≫ g = h) : Mono f := by
subst h; exact mono_of_mono f g
theorem epi_of_epi {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Epi (f ≫ g)] : Epi g :=
⟨fun _ _ w => (cancel_epi (f ≫ g)).1 <| by simp only [Category.assoc, w]⟩
theorem epi_of_epi_fac {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [Epi h]
(w : f ≫ g = h) : Epi g := by
subst h; exact epi_of_epi f g
|
section
variable [Quiver.IsThin C] (f : X ⟶ Y)
instance : Mono f where
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Category/Basic.lean | 333 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, differentiableWithinAtProp_self_source,
DifferentiableWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx',
preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt]
rw [differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy,
continuousWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source)
(hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. Version requiring differentiability
in the target instead of `range I`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' hx,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' hy)
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, DifferentiableOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, MDifferentiableOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
/-- Differentiability on a set is equivalent to differentiability in the extended charts. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [DifferentiableWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_target :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f)
(s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [mdifferentiableOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp_inter (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp_inter h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff_target :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
end IsManifold
/-! ### Deducing differentiability from smoothness -/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt (mod_cast hn)).mono
(by mfld_set_tac)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
(hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn := ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiable := ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt
/-! ### Deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds -/
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s)
(hg : MDifferentiableOn I I'' g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I I'' g) : MDifferentiable I (I'.prod I'') fun x => (f x, g x) := fun x =>
(hf x).prodMk (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk := MDifferentiable.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s) (hg : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk_space (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''} (hf : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g) : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') fun x => (f x, g x) :=
fun x => (hf x).prodMk_space (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiable.prodMk_space
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_comp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
{y | writtenInExtChartAt I I'' x (g ∘ f) y =
(writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x := by
apply
@Filter.mem_of_superset _ _ (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) _
(extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
(h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _)))
mfld_set_tac
variable {f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
/-- `UniqueMDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
protected nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
protected theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
/-!
### General lemmas on derivatives of functions between manifolds
We mimic the API for functions between vector spaces
-/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderivWithin_univ : mfderivWithin I I' f univ = mfderiv I I' f := by
ext x : 1
simp only [mfderivWithin, mfderiv, mfld_simps]
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] : MDifferentiable I I' f := by
intro x
have : Subsingleton H := I.injective.subsingleton
have : DiscreteTopology M := discreteTopology H M
simp only [mdifferentiableAt_iff, continuous_of_discreteTopology.continuousAt, true_and]
exact (hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ _).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin
(hf : (mfderivWithin I I' f s x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
contrapose hf
rw [mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt hf]
contrapose! hf
rcases ContinuousLinearMap.isInvertible_zero_iff.1 hf with ⟨hE, hF⟩
have : Subsingleton E := hE
exact mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton.mdifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_of_isInvertible_mfderiv
(hf : (mfderiv I I' f x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp only [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mfderivWithin_univ] at hf ⊢
exact mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin hf
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst,
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 (inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono hst) (Subset.refl _))⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt h.1, HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 inter_subset_right⟩
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f univ x f' ↔ HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivAt, continuousWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivAt_unique (h₀ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₀') (h₁ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₁') :
f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact (uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq,
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter', continuousWithinAt_inter' h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin h
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter,
continuousWithinAt_inter h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds h
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(ht : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∪ t) x f' := by
constructor
· exact ContinuousWithinAt.union hs.1 ht.1
· convert HasFDerivWithinAt.union hs.2 ht.2 using 1
simp only [union_inter_distrib_right, preimage_union]
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (ht : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f' :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht).1 (h.mono inter_subset_right)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x (mfderivWithin I I' f s x) := by
refine ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.2
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_exists_hasMFDerivWithinAt :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ ∃ f', HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨mfderivWithin I I' f s x, h.hasMFDerivWithinAt⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact hf'.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
(h.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set M} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
protected theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f :) ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x (mfderiv I I' f x) := by
refine ⟨h.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
protected theorem MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f :) (range I) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos]
protected theorem HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') : mfderiv I I' f x = f' :=
(hasMFDerivAt_unique h h.mdifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt).symm
protected theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = f' := by
ext
rw [hxs.eq h h.mdifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt]
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin_eq_zero (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x 0) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
| simp only [mfld_simps, mfderivWithin, h.mdifferentiableWithinAt, ↓reduceIte]
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, mfld_simps] at h
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos]
exact h.2
theorem MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
apply HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin _ hxs
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 755 | 762 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alena Gusakov, Bhavik Mehta, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Bhavik Mehta, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
/-!
# Hall's Marriage Theorem
Given a list of finite subsets $X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n$ of some given set
$S$, P. Hall in [Hall1935] gave a necessary and sufficient condition for
there to be a list of distinct elements $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$ with
$x_i\in X_i$ for each $i$: it is when for each $k$, the union of every
$k$ of these subsets has at least $k$ elements.
Rather than a list of finite subsets, one may consider indexed families
`t : ι → Finset α` of finite subsets with `ι` a `Fintype`, and then the list
of distinct representatives is given by an injective function `f : ι → α`
such that `∀ i, f i ∈ t i`, called a *matching*.
This version is formalized as `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective'`
in a separate module.
The theorem can be generalized to remove the constraint that `ι` be a `Fintype`.
As observed in [Halpern1966], one may use the constrained version of the theorem
in a compactness argument to remove this constraint.
The formulation of compactness we use is that inverse limits of nonempty finite sets
are nonempty (`nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system`), which uses the
Tychonoff theorem.
The core of this module is constructing the inverse system: for every finite subset `ι'` of
`ι`, we can consider the matchings on the restriction of the indexed family `t` to `ι'`.
## Main statements
* `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of `t : ι → Finset α`.
* `Fintype.all_card_le_rel_image_card_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of a relation
`r : α → β → Prop` such that `Rel.image r {a}` is a finite set for all `a : α`.
* `Fintype.all_card_le_filter_rel_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of a relation
`r : α → β → Prop` on finite types, with the Hall condition given in terms of
`finset.univ.filter`.
## TODO
* The statement of the theorem in terms of bipartite graphs is in preparation.
## Tags
Hall's Marriage Theorem, indexed families
-/
open Finset Function CategoryTheory
universe u v
/-- The set of matchings for `t` when restricted to a `Finset` of `ι`. -/
def hallMatchingsOn {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) (ι' : Finset ι) :=
{ f : ι' → α | Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ (x : {x // x ∈ ι'}), f x ∈ t x }
/-- Given a matching on a finset, construct the restriction of that matching to a subset. -/
def hallMatchingsOn.restrict {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) {ι' ι'' : Finset ι}
(h : ι' ⊆ ι'') (f : hallMatchingsOn t ι'') : hallMatchingsOn t ι' := by
refine ⟨fun i => f.val ⟨i, h i.property⟩, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨hinj, hc⟩ := f.property
refine ⟨?_, fun i => hc ⟨i, h i.property⟩⟩
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ hh
simpa only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk] using hinj hh
/-- When the Hall condition is satisfied, the set of matchings on a finite set is nonempty.
This is where `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_existsInjective'` comes into the argument. -/
theorem hallMatchingsOn.nonempty {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} [DecidableEq α] (t : ι → Finset α)
(h : ∀ s : Finset ι, #s ≤ #(s.biUnion t)) (ι' : Finset ι) :
Nonempty (hallMatchingsOn t ι') := by
classical
refine ⟨Classical.indefiniteDescription _ ?_⟩
apply (all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_existsInjective' fun i : ι' => t i).mp
intro s'
convert h (s'.image (↑)) using 1
· simp only [card_image_of_injective s' Subtype.coe_injective]
· rw [image_biUnion]
/-- This is the `hallMatchingsOn` sets assembled into a directed system.
-/
def hallMatchingsFunctor {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) :
(Finset ι)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u v where
obj ι' := hallMatchingsOn t ι'.unop
map {_ _} g f := hallMatchingsOn.restrict t (CategoryTheory.leOfHom g.unop) f
instance hallMatchingsOn.finite {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) (ι' : Finset ι) :
Finite (hallMatchingsOn t ι') := by
classical
rw [hallMatchingsOn]
let g : hallMatchingsOn t ι' → ι' → ι'.biUnion t := by
rintro f i
refine ⟨f.val i, ?_⟩
rw [mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨i, i.property, f.property.2 i⟩
apply Finite.of_injective g
intro f f' h
ext a
rw [funext_iff] at h
simpa [g] using h a
/-- This is the version of **Hall's Marriage Theorem** in terms of indexed
families of finite sets `t : ι → Finset α`. It states that there is a
set of distinct representatives if and only if every union of `k` of the
sets has at least `k` elements.
Recall that `s.biUnion t` is the union of all the sets `t i` for `i ∈ s`.
This theorem is bootstrapped from `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective'`,
which has the additional constraint that `ι` is a `Fintype`.
-/
theorem Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective {ι : Type u} {α : Type v}
[DecidableEq α] (t : ι → Finset α) :
(∀ s : Finset ι, #s ≤ #(s.biUnion t)) ↔
∃ f : ι → α, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ t x := by
constructor
· intro h
-- Set up the functor
haveI : ∀ ι' : (Finset ι)ᵒᵖ, Nonempty ((hallMatchingsFunctor t).obj ι') := fun ι' =>
hallMatchingsOn.nonempty t h ι'.unop
classical
haveI : ∀ ι' : (Finset ι)ᵒᵖ, Finite ((hallMatchingsFunctor t).obj ι') := by
intro ι'
rw [hallMatchingsFunctor]
infer_instance
-- Apply the compactness argument
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system (hallMatchingsFunctor t)
-- Interpret the resulting section of the inverse limit
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
·-- Build the matching function from the section
exact fun i =>
(u (Opposite.op ({i} : Finset ι))).val ⟨i, by simp only [Opposite.unop_op, mem_singleton]⟩
· -- Show that it is injective
intro i i'
have subi : ({i} : Finset ι) ⊆ {i, i'} := by simp
have subi' : ({i'} : Finset ι) ⊆ {i, i'} := by simp
rw [← Finset.le_iff_subset] at subi subi'
simp only
rw [← hu (CategoryTheory.homOfLE subi).op, ← hu (CategoryTheory.homOfLE subi').op]
let uii' := u (Opposite.op ({i, i'} : Finset ι))
exact fun h => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mp (uii'.property.1 h)
· -- Show that it maps each index to the corresponding finite set
intro i
apply (u (Opposite.op ({i} : Finset ι))).property.2
· -- The reverse direction is a straightforward cardinality argument
rintro ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ s
rw [← Finset.card_image_of_injective s hf₁]
apply Finset.card_le_card
intro
rw [Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, hf₂ x⟩
/-- Given a relation such that the image of every singleton set is finite, then the image of every
finite set is finite. -/
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq β] (r : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a : α, Fintype (Rel.image r {a})] (A : Finset α) : Fintype (Rel.image r A) := by
have h : Rel.image r A = (A.biUnion fun a => (Rel.image r {a}).toFinset : Set β) := by
ext
simp [Rel.image]
rw [h]
apply FinsetCoe.fintype
/-- This is a version of **Hall's Marriage Theorem** in terms of a relation
between types `α` and `β` such that `α` is finite and the image of
each `x : α` is finite (it suffices for `β` to be finite; see
`Fintype.all_card_le_filter_rel_iff_exists_injective`). There is
a transversal of the relation (an injective function `α → β` whose graph is
a subrelation of the relation) iff every subset of
`k` terms of `α` is related to at least `k` terms of `β`.
Note: if `[Fintype β]`, then there exist instances for `[∀ (a : α), Fintype (Rel.image r {a})]`.
-/
theorem Fintype.all_card_le_rel_image_card_iff_exists_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[DecidableEq β] (r : α → β → Prop) [∀ a : α, Fintype (Rel.image r {a})] :
(∀ A : Finset α, #A ≤ Fintype.card (Rel.image r A)) ↔
∃ f : α → β, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ x, r x (f x) := by
let r' a := (Rel.image r {a}).toFinset
have h : ∀ A : Finset α, Fintype.card (Rel.image r A) = #(A.biUnion r') := by
intro A
rw [← Set.toFinset_card]
apply congr_arg
ext b
simp [r', Rel.image]
have h' : ∀ (f : α → β) (x), r x (f x) ↔ f x ∈ r' x := by simp [r', Rel.image]
simp only [h, h']
apply Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective
-- TODO: decidable_pred makes Yael sad. When an appropriate decidable_rel-like exists, fix it.
/-- This is a version of **Hall's Marriage Theorem** in terms of a relation to a finite type.
There is a transversal of the relation (an injective function `α → β` whose graph is a subrelation
of the relation) iff every subset of `k` terms of `α` is related to at least `k` terms of `β`.
It is like `Fintype.all_card_le_rel_image_card_iff_exists_injective` but uses `Finset.filter`
rather than `Rel.image`.
-/
theorem Fintype.all_card_le_filter_rel_iff_exists_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Fintype β]
(r : α → β → Prop) [∀ a, DecidablePred (r a)] :
(∀ A : Finset α, #A ≤ #{b | ∃ a ∈ A, r a b}) ↔ ∃ f : α → β, Injective f ∧ ∀ x, r x (f x) := by
haveI := Classical.decEq β
let r' a : Finset β := {b | r a b}
have h : ∀ A : Finset α, ({b | ∃ a ∈ A, r a b} : Finset _) = A.biUnion r' := by
intro A
ext b
simp [r']
have h' : ∀ (f : α → β) (x), r x (f x) ↔ f x ∈ r' x := by simp [r']
simp_rw [h, h']
apply Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Hall/Basic.lean | 213 | 225 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LinearMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakBilin
/-!
# Weak dual topology
We continue in the setting of `Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakBilin`,
which defines the weak topology given two vector spaces `E` and `F` over a commutative semiring
`𝕜` and a bilinear form `B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜`. The weak topology on `E` is the coarsest topology
such that for all `y : F` every map `fun x => B x y` is continuous.
In this file, we consider two special cases.
In the case that `F = E →L[𝕜] 𝕜` and `B` being the canonical pairing, we obtain the weak-* topology,
`WeakDual 𝕜 E := (E →L[𝕜] 𝕜)`. Interchanging the arguments in the bilinear form yields the
weak topology `WeakSpace 𝕜 E := E`.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are the types `WeakDual 𝕜 E` and `WeakSpace 𝕜 E`,
with the respective topology instances on it.
* `WeakDual 𝕜 E` is a type synonym for `Dual 𝕜 E` (when the latter is defined): both are equal to
the type `E →L[𝕜] 𝕜` of continuous linear maps from a module `E` over `𝕜` to the ring `𝕜`.
* The instance `WeakDual.instTopologicalSpace` is the weak-* topology on `WeakDual 𝕜 E`, i.e., the
coarsest topology making the evaluation maps at all `z : E` continuous.
* `WeakSpace 𝕜 E` is a type synonym for `E` (when the latter is defined).
* The instance `WeakSpace.instTopologicalSpace` is the weak topology on `E`, i.e., the
coarsest topology such that all `v : dual 𝕜 E` remain continuous.
## Notations
No new notation is introduced.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
weak-star, weak dual, duality
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter
open Topology
variable {α 𝕜 𝕝 E F : Type*}
/-- The canonical pairing of a vector space and its topological dual. -/
def topDualPairing (𝕜 E) [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
[Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜] : (E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM 𝕜
theorem topDualPairing_apply [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜] (v : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜)
(x : E) : topDualPairing 𝕜 E v x = v x :=
rfl
/-- The weak star topology is the topology coarsest topology on `E →L[𝕜] 𝕜` such that all
functionals `fun v => v x` are continuous. -/
def WeakDual (𝕜 E : Type*) [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] :=
WeakBilin (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
namespace WeakDual
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜]
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
-- The following instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instAddCommMonoid (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instModule (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
instance instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instTopologicalSpace (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
instance instContinuousAdd : ContinuousAdd (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instContinuousAdd (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
ContinuousLinearMap.inhabited
instance instFunLike : FunLike (WeakDual 𝕜 E) E 𝕜 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.funLike
instance instContinuousLinearMapClass : ContinuousLinearMapClass (WeakDual 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E 𝕜 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.continuousSemilinearMapClass
/-- If a monoid `M` distributively continuously acts on `𝕜` and this action commutes with
multiplication on `𝕜`, then it acts on `WeakDual 𝕜 E`. -/
instance instMulAction (M) [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M 𝕜] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 M 𝕜]
[ContinuousConstSMul M 𝕜] : MulAction M (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
ContinuousLinearMap.mulAction
/-- If a monoid `M` distributively continuously acts on `𝕜` and this action commutes with
multiplication on `𝕜`, then it acts distributively on `WeakDual 𝕜 E`. -/
instance instDistribMulAction (M) [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M 𝕜] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 M 𝕜]
[ContinuousConstSMul M 𝕜] : DistribMulAction M (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
ContinuousLinearMap.distribMulAction
/-- If `𝕜` is a topological module over a semiring `R` and scalar multiplication commutes with the
multiplication on `𝕜`, then `WeakDual 𝕜 E` is a module over `R`. -/
instance instModule' (R) [Semiring R] [Module R 𝕜] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R 𝕜] [ContinuousConstSMul R 𝕜] :
Module R (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
ContinuousLinearMap.module
instance instContinuousConstSMul (M) [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M 𝕜] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 M 𝕜]
[ContinuousConstSMul M 𝕜] : ContinuousConstSMul M (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun m =>
continuous_induced_rng.2 <| (WeakBilin.coeFn_continuous (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)).const_smul m⟩
/-- If a monoid `M` distributively continuously acts on `𝕜` and this action commutes with
multiplication on `𝕜`, then it continuously acts on `WeakDual 𝕜 E`. -/
instance instContinuousSMul (M) [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M 𝕜] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 M 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousSMul M 𝕜] : ContinuousSMul M (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
⟨continuous_induced_rng.2 <|
continuous_fst.smul ((WeakBilin.coeFn_continuous (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)).comp continuous_snd)⟩
theorem coeFn_continuous : Continuous fun (x : WeakDual 𝕜 E) y => x y :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem eval_continuous (y : E) : Continuous fun x : WeakDual 𝕜 E => x y :=
continuous_pi_iff.mp coeFn_continuous y
theorem continuous_of_continuous_eval [TopologicalSpace α] {g : α → WeakDual 𝕜 E}
(h : ∀ y, Continuous fun a => (g a) y) : Continuous g :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 (continuous_pi_iff.mpr h)
instance instT2Space [T2Space 𝕜] : T2Space (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
(WeakBilin.isEmbedding ContinuousLinearMap.coe_injective).t2Space
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [IsTopologicalAddGroup 𝕜] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instAddCommGroup (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
instance instIsTopologicalAddGroup : IsTopologicalAddGroup (WeakDual 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instIsTopologicalAddGroup (topDualPairing 𝕜 E)
end Ring
end WeakDual
/-- The weak topology is the topology coarsest topology on `E` such that all functionals
`fun x => v x` are continuous. -/
def WeakSpace (𝕜 E) [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] :=
WeakBilin (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜]
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
namespace WeakSpace
-- The following instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instAddCommMonoid (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instModule (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instTopologicalSpace (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instContinuousAdd : ContinuousAdd (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instContinuousAdd (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instModule' [CommSemiring 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 E] : Module 𝕝 (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instModule' (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instIsScalarTower [CommSemiring 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] :
IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instIsScalarTower (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A continuous linear map from `E` to `F` is still continuous when `E` and `F` are equipped with
their weak topologies. -/
def map (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : WeakSpace 𝕜 E →L[𝕜] WeakSpace 𝕜 F :=
{ f with
cont :=
WeakBilin.continuous_of_continuous_eval _ fun l => WeakBilin.eval_continuous _ (l ∘L f) }
theorem map_apply (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : WeakSpace.map f x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : (WeakSpace.map f : E → F) = f :=
rfl
end WeakSpace
variable (𝕜 E) in
/-- There is a canonical map `E → WeakSpace 𝕜 E` (the "identity"
mapping). It is a linear equivalence. -/
def toWeakSpace : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] WeakSpace 𝕜 E := LinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 E
variable (𝕜 E) in
/-- For a topological vector space `E`, "identity mapping" `E → WeakSpace 𝕜 E` is continuous.
This definition implements it as a continuous linear map. -/
def toWeakSpaceCLM : E →L[𝕜] WeakSpace 𝕜 E where
__ := toWeakSpace 𝕜 E
cont := by
apply WeakBilin.continuous_of_continuous_eval
exact ContinuousLinearMap.continuous
variable (𝕜 E) in
@[simp]
theorem toWeakSpaceCLM_eq_toWeakSpace (x : E) :
toWeakSpaceCLM 𝕜 E x = toWeakSpace 𝕜 E x := by rfl
theorem toWeakSpaceCLM_bijective :
Function.Bijective (toWeakSpaceCLM 𝕜 E) :=
(toWeakSpace 𝕜 E).bijective
/-- The canonical map from `WeakSpace 𝕜 E` to `E` is an open map. -/
theorem isOpenMap_toWeakSpace_symm : IsOpenMap (toWeakSpace 𝕜 E).symm :=
IsOpenMap.of_inverse (toWeakSpaceCLM 𝕜 E).cont
(toWeakSpace 𝕜 E).left_inv (toWeakSpace 𝕜 E).right_inv
/-- A set in `E` which is open in the weak topology is open. -/
theorem WeakSpace.isOpen_of_isOpen (V : Set E)
(hV : IsOpen ((toWeakSpaceCLM 𝕜 E) '' V : Set (WeakSpace 𝕜 E))) : IsOpen V := by
simpa [Set.image_image] using isOpenMap_toWeakSpace_symm _ hV
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_eval_tendsto_topDualPairing {l : Filter α} {f : α → WeakDual 𝕜 E}
{x : WeakDual 𝕜 E} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔
∀ y, Tendsto (fun i => topDualPairing 𝕜 E (f i) y) l (𝓝 (topDualPairing 𝕜 E x y)) :=
WeakBilin.tendsto_iff_forall_eval_tendsto _ ContinuousLinearMap.coe_injective
end Semiring
section Ring
namespace WeakSpace
variable [CommRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [IsTopologicalAddGroup 𝕜] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 𝕜]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instAddCommGroup (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
instance instIsTopologicalAddGroup : IsTopologicalAddGroup (WeakSpace 𝕜 E) :=
WeakBilin.instIsTopologicalAddGroup (topDualPairing 𝕜 E).flip
end WeakSpace
end Ring
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/WeakDual.lean | 360 | 362 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Hom.ContinuousEval
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
/-!
# The compact-open topology
In this file, we define the compact-open topology on the set of continuous maps between two
topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMap.compactOpen` is the compact-open topology on `C(X, Y)`.
It is declared as an instance.
* `ContinuousMap.coev` is the coevaluation map `Y → C(X, Y × X)`. It is always continuous.
* `ContinuousMap.curry` is the currying map `C(X × Y, Z) → C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This map always exists
and it is continuous as long as `X × Y` is locally compact.
* `ContinuousMap.uncurry` is the uncurrying map `C(X, C(Y, Z)) → C(X × Y, Z)`. For this map to
exist, we need `Y` to be locally compact. If `X` is also locally compact, then this map is
continuous.
* `Homeomorph.curry` combines the currying and uncurrying operations into a homeomorphism
`C(X × Y, Z) ≃ₜ C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This homeomorphism exists if `X` and `Y` are locally compact.
## Tags
compact-open, curry, function space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology
namespace ContinuousMap
section CompactOpen
variable {α X Y Z T : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace T]
variable {K : Set X} {U : Set Y}
/-- The compact-open topology on the space of continuous maps `C(X, Y)`. -/
instance compactOpen : TopologicalSpace C(X, Y) :=
.generateFrom <| image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {U | IsOpen U}
/-- Definition of `ContinuousMap.compactOpen`. -/
theorem compactOpen_eq : @compactOpen X Y _ _ =
.generateFrom (image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {t | IsOpen t}) :=
rfl
theorem isOpen_setOf_mapsTo (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) :
IsOpen {f : C(X, Y) | MapsTo f K U} :=
isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem <| mem_image2_of_mem hK hU
lemma eventually_mapsTo {f : C(X, Y)} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) (h : MapsTo f K U) :
∀ᶠ g : C(X, Y) in 𝓝 f, MapsTo g K U :=
(isOpen_setOf_mapsTo hK hU).mem_nhds h
lemma nhds_compactOpen (f : C(X, Y)) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ (K : Set X) (_ : IsCompact K) (U : Set Y) (_ : IsOpen U) (_ : MapsTo f K U),
𝓟 {g : C(X, Y) | MapsTo g K U} := by
simp_rw [compactOpen_eq, nhds_generateFrom, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (f ∈ _), iInf_and,
← image_prod, iInf_image, biInf_prod, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendsto_nhds_compactOpen {l : Filter α} {f : α → C(Y, Z)} {g : C(Y, Z)} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 g) ↔
∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → MapsTo g K U → ∀ᶠ a in l, MapsTo (f a) K U := by
simp [nhds_compactOpen]
lemma continuous_compactOpen {f : X → C(Y, Z)} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → IsOpen {x | MapsTo (f x) K U} :=
continuous_generateFrom_iff.trans forall_mem_image2
protected lemma hasBasis_nhds (f : C(X, Y)) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis
(fun S : Set (Set X × Set Y) ↦
S.Finite ∧ ∀ K U, (K, U) ∈ S → IsCompact K ∧ IsOpen U ∧ MapsTo f K U)
(⋂ KU ∈ ·, {g : C(X, Y) | MapsTo g KU.1 KU.2}) := by
refine ⟨fun s ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhds_compactOpen, iInf_comm.{_, 0, _ + 1}, iInf_prod', iInf_and']
simp [mem_biInf_principal, and_assoc]
protected lemma mem_nhds_iff {f : C(X, Y)} {s : Set C(X, Y)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 f ↔ ∃ S : Set (Set X × Set Y), S.Finite ∧
(∀ K U, (K, U) ∈ S → IsCompact K ∧ IsOpen U ∧ MapsTo f K U) ∧
{g : C(X, Y) | ∀ K U, (K, U) ∈ S → MapsTo g K U} ⊆ s := by
simp [f.hasBasis_nhds.mem_iff, ← setOf_forall, and_assoc]
section Functorial
/-- `C(X, ·)` is a functor. -/
theorem continuous_postcomp (g : C(Y, Z)) : Continuous (ContinuousMap.comp g : C(X, Y) → C(X, Z)) :=
continuous_compactOpen.2 fun _K hK _U hU ↦ isOpen_setOf_mapsTo hK (hU.preimage g.2)
/-- If `g : C(Y, Z)` is a topology inducing map,
then the composition `ContinuousMap.comp g : C(X, Y) → C(X, Z)` is a topology inducing map too. -/
theorem isInducing_postcomp (g : C(Y, Z)) (hg : IsInducing g) :
IsInducing (g.comp : C(X, Y) → C(X, Z)) where
eq_induced := by
simp only [compactOpen_eq, induced_generateFrom_eq, image_image2, hg.setOf_isOpen,
image2_image_right, MapsTo, mem_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq, comp_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_postcomp := isInducing_postcomp
/-- If `g : C(Y, Z)` is a topological embedding,
then the composition `ContinuousMap.comp g : C(X, Y) → C(X, Z)` is an embedding too. -/
theorem isEmbedding_postcomp (g : C(Y, Z)) (hg : IsEmbedding g) :
IsEmbedding (g.comp : C(X, Y) → C(X, Z)) :=
⟨isInducing_postcomp g hg.1, fun _ _ ↦ (cancel_left hg.2).1⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_postcomp := isEmbedding_postcomp
/-- `C(·, Z)` is a functor. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_precomp (f : C(X, Y)) : Continuous (fun g => g.comp f : C(Y, Z) → C(X, Z)) :=
continuous_compactOpen.2 fun K hK U hU ↦ by
simpa only [mapsTo_image_iff] using isOpen_setOf_mapsTo (hK.image f.2) hU
variable (Z) in
/-- Precomposition by a continuous map is itself a continuous map between spaces of continuous maps.
-/
@[simps apply]
def compRightContinuousMap (f : C(X, Y)) :
C(C(Y, Z), C(X, Z)) where
toFun g := g.comp f
/-- Any pair of homeomorphisms `X ≃ₜ Z` and `Y ≃ₜ T` gives rise to a homeomorphism
`C(X, Y) ≃ₜ C(Z, T)`. -/
protected def _root_.Homeomorph.arrowCongr (φ : X ≃ₜ Z) (ψ : Y ≃ₜ T) :
C(X, Y) ≃ₜ C(Z, T) where
toFun f := .comp ψ <| f.comp φ.symm
invFun f := .comp ψ.symm <| f.comp φ
left_inv f := ext fun _ ↦ ψ.left_inv (f _) |>.trans <| congrArg f <| φ.left_inv _
right_inv f := ext fun _ ↦ ψ.right_inv (f _) |>.trans <| congrArg f <| φ.right_inv _
continuous_toFun := continuous_postcomp _ |>.comp <| continuous_precomp _
continuous_invFun := continuous_postcomp _ |>.comp <| continuous_precomp _
variable [LocallyCompactPair Y Z]
/-- Composition is a continuous map from `C(X, Y) × C(Y, Z)` to `C(X, Z)`,
provided that `Y` is locally compact.
This is Prop. 9 of Chap. X, §3, №. 4 of Bourbaki's *Topologie Générale*. -/
theorem continuous_comp' : Continuous fun x : C(X, Y) × C(Y, Z) => x.2.comp x.1 := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_compactOpen]
intro ⟨f, g⟩ K hK U hU (hKU : MapsTo (g ∘ f) K U)
obtain ⟨L, hKL, hLc, hLU⟩ : ∃ L ∈ 𝓝ˢ (f '' K), IsCompact L ∧ MapsTo g L U :=
exists_mem_nhdsSet_isCompact_mapsTo g.continuous (hK.image f.continuous) hU
(mapsTo_image_iff.2 hKU)
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, ← mapsTo'] at hKL
exact ((eventually_mapsTo hK isOpen_interior hKL).prod_nhds
(eventually_mapsTo hLc hU hLU)).mono fun ⟨f', g'⟩ ⟨hf', hg'⟩ ↦
hg'.comp <| hf'.mono_right interior_subset
lemma _root_.Filter.Tendsto.compCM {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → C(Y, Z)} {g₀ : C(Y, Z)}
{f : α → C(X, Y)} {f₀ : C(X, Y)} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 g₀)) (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 f₀)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (g a).comp (f a)) l (𝓝 (g₀.comp f₀)) :=
(continuous_comp'.tendsto (f₀, g₀)).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
variable {X' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X'] {a : X'} {g : X' → C(Y, Z)} {f : X' → C(X, Y)}
{s : Set X'}
nonrec lemma _root_.ContinuousAt.compCM (hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hf : ContinuousAt f a) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ (g x).comp (f x)) a :=
hg.compCM hf
nonrec lemma _root_.ContinuousWithinAt.compCM (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a)
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ (g x).comp (f x)) s a :=
hg.compCM hf
lemma _root_.ContinuousOn.compCM (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (g x).comp (f x)) s := fun a ha ↦
(hg a ha).compCM (hf a ha)
lemma _root_.Continuous.compCM (hg : Continuous g) (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (g x).comp (f x) :=
continuous_comp'.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
end Functorial
section Ev
/-- The evaluation map `C(X, Y) × X → Y` is continuous
if `X, Y` is a locally compact pair of spaces. -/
instance [LocallyCompactPair X Y] : ContinuousEval C(X, Y) X Y where
continuous_eval := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_opens _).tendsto_right_iff]
rintro ⟨f, x⟩ U ⟨hx : f x ∈ U, hU : IsOpen U⟩
rcases exists_mem_nhds_isCompact_mapsTo f.continuous (hU.mem_nhds hx) with ⟨K, hxK, hK, hKU⟩
filter_upwards [prod_mem_nhds (eventually_mapsTo hK hU hKU) hxK] using fun _ h ↦ h.1 h.2
instance : ContinuousEvalConst C(X, Y) X Y where
continuous_eval_const x :=
continuous_def.2 fun U hU ↦ by simpa using isOpen_setOf_mapsTo isCompact_singleton hU
lemma isClosed_setOf_mapsTo {t : Set Y} (ht : IsClosed t) (s : Set X) :
IsClosed {f : C(X, Y) | MapsTo f s t} :=
ht.setOf_mapsTo fun _ _ ↦ continuous_eval_const _
lemma isClopen_setOf_mapsTo (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsClopen U) :
IsClopen {f : C(X, Y) | MapsTo f K U} :=
⟨isClosed_setOf_mapsTo hU.isClosed K, isOpen_setOf_mapsTo hK hU.isOpen⟩
@[norm_cast]
lemma specializes_coe {f g : C(X, Y)} : ⇑f ⤳ ⇑g ↔ f ⤳ g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.map continuous_coeFun⟩
suffices ∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → MapsTo g K U → MapsTo f K U by
simpa [specializes_iff_pure, nhds_compactOpen]
exact fun K _ U hU hg x hx ↦ (h.map (continuous_apply x)).mem_open hU (hg hx)
@[norm_cast]
lemma inseparable_coe {f g : C(X, Y)} : Inseparable (f : X → Y) g ↔ Inseparable f g := by
simp only [inseparable_iff_specializes_and, specializes_coe]
instance [T0Space Y] : T0Space C(X, Y) :=
t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous DFunLike.coe_injective continuous_coeFun
instance [R0Space Y] : R0Space C(X, Y) where
specializes_symmetric f g h := by
rw [← specializes_coe] at h ⊢
exact h.symm
instance [T1Space Y] : T1Space C(X, Y) :=
t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous DFunLike.coe_injective continuous_coeFun
instance [R1Space Y] : R1Space C(X, Y) :=
.of_continuous_specializes_imp continuous_coeFun fun _ _ ↦ specializes_coe.1
instance [T2Space Y] : T2Space C(X, Y) := inferInstance
instance [RegularSpace Y] : RegularSpace C(X, Y) :=
.of_lift'_closure_le fun f ↦ by
rw [← tendsto_id', tendsto_nhds_compactOpen]
intro K hK U hU hf
rcases (hK.image f.continuous).exists_isOpen_closure_subset (hU.mem_nhdsSet.2 hf.image_subset)
with ⟨V, hVo, hKV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (eventually_mapsTo hK hVo (mapsTo'.2 hKV))] with g hg
refine ((isClosed_setOf_mapsTo isClosed_closure K).closure_subset ?_).mono_right hVU
exact closure_mono (fun _ h ↦ h.mono_right subset_closure) hg
instance [T3Space Y] : T3Space C(X, Y) := inferInstance
end Ev
section InfInduced
/-- For any subset `s` of `X`, the restriction of continuous functions to `s` is continuous
as a function from `C(X, Y)` to `C(s, Y)` with their respective compact-open topologies. -/
theorem continuous_restrict (s : Set X) : Continuous fun F : C(X, Y) => F.restrict s :=
continuous_precomp <| restrict s <| .id X
theorem compactOpen_le_induced (s : Set X) :
(ContinuousMap.compactOpen : TopologicalSpace C(X, Y)) ≤
.induced (restrict s) ContinuousMap.compactOpen :=
(continuous_restrict s).le_induced
/-- The compact-open topology on `C(X, Y)`
is equal to the infimum of the compact-open topologies on `C(s, Y)` for `s` a compact subset of `X`.
The key point of the proof is that for every compact set `K`,
the universal set `Set.univ : Set K` is a compact set as well. -/
theorem compactOpen_eq_iInf_induced :
(ContinuousMap.compactOpen : TopologicalSpace C(X, Y)) =
⨅ (K : Set X) (_ : IsCompact K), .induced (.restrict K) ContinuousMap.compactOpen := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun s _ ↦ compactOpen_le_induced s) ?_
refine le_generateFrom <| forall_mem_image2.2 fun K (hK : IsCompact K) U hU ↦ ?_
refine TopologicalSpace.le_def.1 (iInf₂_le K hK) _ ?_
convert isOpen_induced (isOpen_setOf_mapsTo (isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ.1 hK) hU)
simp [mapsTo_univ_iff, Subtype.forall, MapsTo]
theorem nhds_compactOpen_eq_iInf_nhds_induced (f : C(X, Y)) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ (s) (_ : IsCompact s), (𝓝 (f.restrict s)).comap (ContinuousMap.restrict s) := by
rw [compactOpen_eq_iInf_induced]
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced]
theorem tendsto_compactOpen_restrict {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {F : ι → C(X, Y)} {f : C(X, Y)}
(hFf : Filter.Tendsto F l (𝓝 f)) (s : Set X) :
Tendsto (fun i => (F i).restrict s) l (𝓝 (f.restrict s)) :=
(continuous_restrict s).continuousAt.tendsto.comp hFf
theorem tendsto_compactOpen_iff_forall {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} (F : ι → C(X, Y)) (f : C(X, Y)) :
Tendsto F l (𝓝 f) ↔
∀ K, IsCompact K → Tendsto (fun i => (F i).restrict K) l (𝓝 (f.restrict K)) := by
rw [compactOpen_eq_iInf_induced]
simp [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
/-- A family `F` of functions in `C(X, Y)` converges in the compact-open topology, if and only if
it converges in the compact-open topology on each compact subset of `X`. -/
theorem exists_tendsto_compactOpen_iff_forall [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space Y]
{ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot l] (F : ι → C(X, Y)) :
(∃ f, Filter.Tendsto F l (𝓝 f)) ↔
∀ s : Set X, IsCompact s → ∃ f, Filter.Tendsto (fun i => (F i).restrict s) l (𝓝 f) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩ s _
exact ⟨f.restrict s, tendsto_compactOpen_restrict hf s⟩
· intro h
choose f hf using h
-- By uniqueness of limits in a `T2Space`, since `fun i ↦ F i x` tends to both `f s₁ hs₁ x` and
-- `f s₂ hs₂ x`, we have `f s₁ hs₁ x = f s₂ hs₂ x`
have h :
∀ (s₁) (hs₁ : IsCompact s₁) (s₂) (hs₂ : IsCompact s₂) (x : X) (hxs₁ : x ∈ s₁) (hxs₂ : x ∈ s₂),
f s₁ hs₁ ⟨x, hxs₁⟩ = f s₂ hs₂ ⟨x, hxs₂⟩ := by
rintro s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ x hxs₁ hxs₂
haveI := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs₁
haveI := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs₂
have h₁ := (continuous_eval_const (⟨x, hxs₁⟩ : s₁)).continuousAt.tendsto.comp (hf s₁ hs₁)
have h₂ := (continuous_eval_const (⟨x, hxs₂⟩ : s₂)).continuousAt.tendsto.comp (hf s₂ hs₂)
exact tendsto_nhds_unique h₁ h₂
-- So glue the `f s hs` together and prove that this glued function `f₀` is a limit on each
-- compact set `s`
refine ⟨liftCover' _ _ h exists_compact_mem_nhds, ?_⟩
rw [tendsto_compactOpen_iff_forall]
intro s hs
rw [liftCover_restrict']
exact hf s hs
end InfInduced
section Coev
variable (X Y)
/-- The coevaluation map `Y → C(X, Y × X)` sending a point `x : Y` to the continuous function
on `X` sending `y` to `(x, y)`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def coev (b : Y) : C(X, Y × X) :=
{ toFun := Prod.mk b }
variable {X Y}
theorem image_coev {y : Y} (s : Set X) : coev X Y y '' s = {y} ×ˢ s := by simp [singleton_prod]
/-- The coevaluation map `Y → C(X, Y × X)` is continuous (always). -/
theorem continuous_coev : Continuous (coev X Y) := by
have : ∀ {a K U}, MapsTo (coev X Y a) K U ↔ {a} ×ˢ K ⊆ U := by simp [singleton_prod, mapsTo']
simp only [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_compactOpen, this]
intro x K hK U hU hKU
rcases generalized_tube_lemma isCompact_singleton hK hU hKU with ⟨V, W, hV, -, hxV, hKW, hVWU⟩
filter_upwards [hV.mem_nhds (hxV rfl)] with a ha
exact (prod_mono (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ha) hKW).trans hVWU
end Coev
section Curry
/-- The curried form of a continuous map `α × β → γ` as a continuous map `α → C(β, γ)`.
If `a × β` is locally compact, this is continuous. If `α` and `β` are both locally
compact, then this is a homeomorphism, see `Homeomorph.curry`. -/
def curry (f : C(X × Y, Z)) : C(X, C(Y, Z)) where
toFun a := ⟨Function.curry f a, f.continuous.comp <| by fun_prop⟩
continuous_toFun := (continuous_postcomp f).comp continuous_coev
| @[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/CompactOpen.lean | 356 | 356 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Base
/-!
# Akra-Bazzi theorem: The polynomial growth condition
This file defines and develops an API for the polynomial growth condition that appears in the
statement of the Akra-Bazzi theorem: for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to hold, the function `g` must
satisfy the condition that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for u between b*n and n for any constant
`b ∈ (0,1)`.
## Implementation notes
Our definition states that the condition must hold for any `b ∈ (0,1)`. This is equivalent to
only requiring it for `b = 1/2` or any other particular value between 0 and 1. While this
could in principle make it harder to prove that a particular function grows polynomially,
this issue doesn't seem to arise in practice.
-/
open Finset Real Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Topology
namespace AkraBazziRecurrence
/-- The growth condition that the function `g` must satisfy for the Akra-Bazzi theorem to apply.
It roughly states that `c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for `u` between `b*n` and `n` for any
constant `b ∈ (0,1)`. -/
def GrowsPolynomially (f : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1, ∃ c₁ > 0, ∃ c₂ > 0,
∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ∈ Set.Icc (c₁ * (f x)) (c₂ * f x)
namespace GrowsPolynomially
lemma congr_of_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) (hg : GrowsPolynomially g) :
GrowsPolynomially f := by
intro b hb
have hg' := hg b hb
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, hg'⟩ := hg'
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, c₂, hc₂_mem, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hg', (tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hb.1).eventually_forall_ge_atTop hfg, hfg]
with x hx₁ hx₂ hx₃
intro u hu
rw [hx₂ u hu.1, hx₃]
exact hx₁ u hu
lemma iff_eventuallyEq {f g : ℝ → ℝ} (h : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) :
GrowsPolynomially f ↔ GrowsPolynomially g :=
⟨fun hf => congr_of_eventuallyEq h.symm hf, fun hg => congr_of_eventuallyEq h hg⟩
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ}
lemma eventually_atTop_le {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, f u ≤ c * f x := by
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, hc₂, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₂, hc₂, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).2
lemma eventually_atTop_le_nat {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * n) n, f u ≤ c * f n := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := hf.eventually_atTop_le hb
exact ⟨c, hc_mem, hc.natCast_atTop⟩
| lemma eventually_atTop_ge {b : ℝ} (hb : b ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1) (hf : GrowsPolynomially f) :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in atTop, ∀ u ∈ Set.Icc (b * x) x, c * f x ≤ f u := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁, c₂, _, h⟩ := hf b hb
refine ⟨c₁, hc₁, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h]
exact fun _ H u hu => (H u hu).1
| Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/GrowsPolynomially.lean | 73 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LeftExact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.PreservesSheafification
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Subsheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Whiskering
/-!
# Locally injective morphisms of (pre)sheaves
Let `C` be a category equipped with a Grothendieck topology `J`,
and let `D` be a concrete category. In this file, we introduce the typeclass
`Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J φ` for a morphism `φ : F₁ ⟶ F₂` in the category
`Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`. This means that `φ` is locally injective. More precisely,
if `x` and `y` are two elements of some `F₁.obj U` such
the images of `x` and `y` in `F₂.obj U` coincide, then
the equality `x = y` must hold locally, i.e. after restriction
by the maps of a covering sieve.
-/
universe w v' v u' u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
{D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] {FD : D → D → Type*} {CD : D → Type w}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (CD X) (CD Y)] [ConcreteCategory.{w} D FD]
(J : GrothendieckTopology C)
namespace Presheaf
/-- If `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D` is a presheaf with values in a concrete category, if `x` and `y` are
elements in `F.obj X`, this is the sieve of `X.unop` consisting of morphisms `f`
such that `F.map f.op x = F.map f.op y`. -/
@[simps]
def equalizerSieve {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {X : Cᵒᵖ} (x y : ToType (F.obj X)) : Sieve X.unop where
arrows _ f := F.map f.op x = F.map f.op y
downward_closed {X Y} f hf g := by
dsimp at hf ⊢
simp [hf]
@[simp]
lemma equalizerSieve_self_eq_top {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {X : Cᵒᵖ} (x : ToType (F.obj X)) :
equalizerSieve x x = ⊤ := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma equalizerSieve_eq_top_iff {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {X : Cᵒᵖ} (x y : ToType (F.obj X)) :
equalizerSieve x y = ⊤ ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa using (show equalizerSieve x y (𝟙 _) by simp [h])
· rintro rfl
apply equalizerSieve_self_eq_top
variable {F₁ F₂ F₃ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (φ : F₁ ⟶ F₂) (ψ : F₂ ⟶ F₃)
/-- A morphism `φ : F₁ ⟶ F₂` of presheaves `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D` (with `D` a concrete category)
is locally injective for a Grothendieck topology `J` on `C` if
whenever two sections of `F₁` are sent to the same section of `F₂`, then these two
sections coincide locally. -/
class IsLocallyInjective : Prop where
equalizerSieve_mem {X : Cᵒᵖ} (x y : ToType (F₁.obj X)) (h : φ.app X x = φ.app X y) :
equalizerSieve x y ∈ J X.unop
lemma equalizerSieve_mem [IsLocallyInjective J φ]
{X : Cᵒᵖ} (x y : ToType (F₁.obj X)) (h : φ.app X x = φ.app X y) :
equalizerSieve x y ∈ J X.unop :=
IsLocallyInjective.equalizerSieve_mem x y h
lemma isLocallyInjective_of_injective (hφ : ∀ (X : Cᵒᵖ), Function.Injective (φ.app X)) :
IsLocallyInjective J φ where
equalizerSieve_mem {X} x y h := by
convert J.top_mem X.unop
ext Y f
simp only [equalizerSieve_apply, op_unop, Sieve.top_apply, iff_true]
apply hφ
simp [h]
instance [IsIso φ] : IsLocallyInjective J φ :=
isLocallyInjective_of_injective J φ (fun X => Function.Bijective.injective (by
rw [← isIso_iff_bijective]
change IsIso ((forget D).map (φ.app X))
infer_instance))
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
instance isLocallyInjective_forget [IsLocallyInjective J φ] :
IsLocallyInjective J (whiskerRight φ (forget D)) where
equalizerSieve_mem x y h := equalizerSieve_mem J φ x y h
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
lemma isLocallyInjective_forget_iff :
IsLocallyInjective J (whiskerRight φ (forget D)) ↔ IsLocallyInjective J φ := by
constructor
· intro
exact ⟨fun x y h => equalizerSieve_mem J (whiskerRight φ (forget D)) x y h⟩
· intro
infer_instance
lemma isLocallyInjective_iff_equalizerSieve_mem_imp :
IsLocallyInjective J φ ↔ ∀ ⦃X : Cᵒᵖ⦄ (x y : ToType (F₁.obj X)),
equalizerSieve (φ.app _ x) (φ.app _ y) ∈ J X.unop → equalizerSieve x y ∈ J X.unop := by
constructor
· intro _ X x y h
let S := equalizerSieve (φ.app _ x) (φ.app _ y)
let T : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X.unop⦄ (_ : S f), Sieve Y := fun Y f _ =>
equalizerSieve (F₁.map f.op x) ((F₁.map f.op y))
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.transitive h (Sieve.bind S.1 T) ?_)
· rintro Y f ⟨Z, a, g, hg, ha, rfl⟩
simpa using ha
· intro Y f hf
refine J.superset_covering (Sieve.le_pullback_bind S.1 T _ hf)
(equalizerSieve_mem J φ _ _ ?_)
rw [NatTrans.naturality_apply, NatTrans.naturality_apply]
exact hf
· intro hφ
exact ⟨fun {X} x y h => hφ x y (by simp [h])⟩
lemma equalizerSieve_mem_of_equalizerSieve_app_mem
{X : Cᵒᵖ} (x y : ToType (F₁.obj X)) (h : equalizerSieve (φ.app _ x) (φ.app _ y) ∈ J X.unop)
[IsLocallyInjective J φ] :
equalizerSieve x y ∈ J X.unop :=
(isLocallyInjective_iff_equalizerSieve_mem_imp J φ).1 inferInstance x y h
instance isLocallyInjective_comp [IsLocallyInjective J φ] [IsLocallyInjective J ψ] :
IsLocallyInjective J (φ ≫ ψ) where
equalizerSieve_mem {X} x y h := by
apply equalizerSieve_mem_of_equalizerSieve_app_mem J φ
exact equalizerSieve_mem J ψ _ _ (by simpa using h)
lemma isLocallyInjective_of_isLocallyInjective [IsLocallyInjective J (φ ≫ ψ)] :
IsLocallyInjective J φ where
equalizerSieve_mem {X} x y h := equalizerSieve_mem J (φ ≫ ψ) x y (by simp [h])
variable {φ ψ}
lemma isLocallyInjective_of_isLocallyInjective_fac {φψ : F₁ ⟶ F₃} (fac : φ ≫ ψ = φψ)
[IsLocallyInjective J φψ] : IsLocallyInjective J φ := by
subst fac
exact isLocallyInjective_of_isLocallyInjective J φ ψ
lemma isLocallyInjective_iff_of_fac {φψ : F₁ ⟶ F₃} (fac : φ ≫ ψ = φψ) [IsLocallyInjective J ψ] :
IsLocallyInjective J φψ ↔ IsLocallyInjective J φ := by
constructor
· intro
exact isLocallyInjective_of_isLocallyInjective_fac J fac
· intro
rw [← fac]
infer_instance
variable (φ ψ)
lemma isLocallyInjective_comp_iff [IsLocallyInjective J ψ] :
IsLocallyInjective J (φ ≫ ψ) ↔ IsLocallyInjective J φ :=
isLocallyInjective_iff_of_fac J rfl
lemma isLocallyInjective_iff_injective_of_separated
(hsep : Presieve.IsSeparated J (F₁ ⋙ forget D)) :
IsLocallyInjective J φ ↔ ∀ (X : Cᵒᵖ), Function.Injective (φ.app X) := by
constructor
· intro _ X x y h
exact (hsep _ (equalizerSieve_mem J φ x y h)).ext (fun _ _ hf => hf)
· apply isLocallyInjective_of_injective
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
instance (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (G : Subpresheaf F) :
IsLocallyInjective J G.ι :=
isLocallyInjective_of_injective _ _ (fun X => by
intro ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ h
exact Subtype.ext h)
section
open GrothendieckTopology.Plus
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory
instance isLocallyInjective_toPlus (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u v) :
IsLocallyInjective J (J.toPlus P) where
equalizerSieve_mem {X} x y h := by
rw [toPlus_eq_mk, toPlus_eq_mk, eq_mk_iff_exists] at h
obtain ⟨W, h₁, h₂, eq⟩ := h
exact J.superset_covering (fun Y f hf => congr_fun (congr_arg Subtype.val eq) ⟨Y, f, hf⟩) W.2
instance isLocallyInjective_toSheafify (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u v) :
IsLocallyInjective J (J.toSheafify P) := by
dsimp [GrothendieckTopology.toSheafify]
rw [GrothendieckTopology.plusMap_toPlus]
infer_instance
instance isLocallyInjective_toSheafify' {CD : D → Type (max u v)}
[∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (CD X) (CD Y)] [ConcreteCategory.{max u v} D FD]
(P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) [HasWeakSheafify J D] [J.HasSheafCompose (forget D)]
[J.PreservesSheafification (forget D)] :
IsLocallyInjective J (toSheafify J P) := by
rw [← isLocallyInjective_forget_iff, ← sheafComposeIso_hom_fac,
← toSheafify_plusPlusIsoSheafify_hom]
infer_instance
end
end Presheaf
namespace Sheaf
variable {J}
variable {F₁ F₂ : Sheaf J D} (φ : F₁ ⟶ F₂)
/-- If `φ : F₁ ⟶ F₂` is a morphism of sheaves, this is an abbreviation for
`Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J φ.val`. Under suitable assumptions, it
is equivalent to the injectivity of all maps `φ.val.app X`,
see `isLocallyInjective_iff_injective`. -/
abbrev IsLocallyInjective := Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J φ.val
lemma isLocallyInjective_sheafToPresheaf_map_iff :
Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J ((sheafToPresheaf J D).map φ) ↔ IsLocallyInjective φ := by rfl
instance isLocallyInjective_of_iso [IsIso φ] : IsLocallyInjective φ := by
change Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J ((sheafToPresheaf _ _).map φ)
infer_instance
lemma mono_of_injective
(hφ : ∀ (X : Cᵒᵖ), Function.Injective (φ.val.app X)) : Mono φ :=
have : ∀ X, Mono (φ.val.app X) := fun X ↦ ConcreteCategory.mono_of_injective _ (hφ X)
(sheafToPresheaf _ _).mono_of_mono_map (NatTrans.mono_of_mono_app φ.1)
variable [J.HasSheafCompose (forget D)]
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
instance isLocallyInjective_forget [IsLocallyInjective φ] :
IsLocallyInjective ((sheafCompose J (forget D)).map φ) :=
Presheaf.isLocallyInjective_forget J φ.1
lemma isLocallyInjective_iff_injective :
| IsLocallyInjective φ ↔ ∀ (X : Cᵒᵖ), Function.Injective (φ.val.app X) :=
Presheaf.isLocallyInjective_iff_injective_of_separated _ _ (by
apply Presieve.isSeparated_of_isSheaf
rw [← isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/LocallyInjective.lean | 240 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Monoidal
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories
This file defines rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories and the necessary theory about
exact pairings and duals.
## Main definitions
* `ExactPairing` of two objects of a monoidal category
* Type classes `HasLeftDual` and `HasRightDual` that capture that a pairing exists
* The `rightAdjointMate f` as a morphism `fᘁ : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
* The classes of `RightRigidCategory`, `LeftRigidCategory` and `RigidCategory`
## Main statements
* `comp_rightAdjointMate`: The adjoint mates of the composition is the composition of
adjoint mates.
## Notations
* `η_` and `ε_` denote the coevaluation and evaluation morphism of an exact pairing.
* `Xᘁ` and `ᘁX` denote the right and left dual of an object, as well as the adjoint
mate of a morphism.
## Future work
* Show that `X ⊗ Y` and `Yᘁ ⊗ Xᘁ` form an exact pairing.
* Show that the left adjoint mate of the right adjoint mate of a morphism is the morphism itself.
* Simplify constructions in the case where a symmetry or braiding is present.
* Show that `ᘁ` gives an equivalence of categories `C ≅ (Cᵒᵖ)ᴹᵒᵖ`.
* Define pivotal categories (rigid categories equipped with a natural isomorphism `ᘁᘁ ≅ 𝟙 C`).
## Notes
Although we construct the adjunction `tensorLeft Y ⊣ tensorLeft X` from `ExactPairing X Y`,
this is not a bijective correspondence.
I think the correct statement is that `tensorLeft Y` and `tensorLeft X` are
module endofunctors of `C` as a right `C` module category,
and `ExactPairing X Y` is in bijection with adjunctions compatible with this right `C` action.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rigid+monoidal+category>
## Tags
rigid category, monoidal category
-/
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- An exact pairing is a pair of objects `X Y : C` which admit
a coevaluation and evaluation morphism which fulfill two triangle equalities. -/
class ExactPairing (X Y : C) where
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.coevaluation` instead. -/
coevaluation' : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.evaluation` instead. -/
evaluation' : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C
coevaluation_evaluation' :
Y ◁ coevaluation' ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ evaluation' ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
aesop_cat
evaluation_coevaluation' :
coevaluation' ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ evaluation' = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
aesop_cat
namespace ExactPairing
-- Porting note: as there is no mechanism equivalent to `[]` in Lean 3 to make
-- arguments for class fields explicit,
-- we now repeat all the fields without primes.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Making.20variable.20in.20class.20field.20explicit
variable (X Y : C)
variable [ExactPairing X Y]
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def coevaluation : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y := @coevaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def evaluation : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C := @evaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
@[inherit_doc] notation "η_" => ExactPairing.coevaluation
@[inherit_doc] notation "ε_" => ExactPairing.evaluation
lemma coevaluation_evaluation :
Y ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ X _ ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv :=
coevaluation_evaluation'
lemma evaluation_coevaluation :
η_ _ _ ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ ε_ _ Y = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv :=
evaluation_coevaluation'
lemma coevaluation_evaluation'' :
Y ◁ η_ X Y ⊗≫ ε_ X Y ▷ Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert coevaluation_evaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
lemma evaluation_coevaluation'' :
η_ X Y ▷ X ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert evaluation_coevaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
end ExactPairing
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.coevaluation_evaluation
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.evaluation_coevaluation
instance exactPairingUnit : ExactPairing (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) where
coevaluation' := (ρ_ _).inv
evaluation' := (ρ_ _).hom
coevaluation_evaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
evaluation_coevaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
/-- A class of objects which have a right dual. -/
class HasRightDual (X : C) where
/-- The right dual of the object `X`. -/
rightDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing X rightDual]
/-- A class of objects which have a left dual. -/
class HasLeftDual (Y : C) where
/-- The left dual of the object `X`. -/
leftDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing leftDual Y]
attribute [instance] HasRightDual.exact
attribute [instance] HasLeftDual.exact
open ExactPairing HasRightDual HasLeftDual MonoidalCategory
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596
The overlapping notation for `leftDual` and `leftAdjointMate` become more problematic in
after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596, and we sometimes have to disambiguate with
e.g. `(ᘁX : C)` where previously just `ᘁX` was enough. -/
@[inherit_doc] prefix:1024 "ᘁ" => leftDual
@[inherit_doc] postfix:1024 "ᘁ" => rightDual
instance hasRightDualUnit : HasRightDual (𝟙_ C) where
rightDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasLeftDualUnit : HasLeftDual (𝟙_ C) where
leftDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasRightDualLeftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : HasRightDual ᘁX where
rightDual := X
instance hasLeftDualRightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : HasLeftDual Xᘁ where
leftDual := X
@[simp]
theorem leftDual_rightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : ᘁXᘁ = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightDual_leftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁX)ᘁ = X :=
rfl
/-- The right adjoint mate `fᘁ : Xᘁ ⟶ Yᘁ` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ :=
(ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ _ ◁ f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
/-- The left adjoint mate `ᘁf : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX :=
(λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ _ ≫ (_ ◁ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
@[inherit_doc] notation f "ᘁ" => rightAdjointMate f
@[inherit_doc] notation "ᘁ" f => leftAdjointMate f
@[simp]
theorem rightAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : (𝟙 X)ᘁ = 𝟙 (Xᘁ) := by
simp [rightAdjointMate]
@[simp]
theorem leftAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁ(𝟙 X)) = 𝟙 (ᘁX) := by
simp [leftAdjointMate]
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Xᘁ ⟶ Z} :
fᘁ ≫ g =
(ρ_ (Yᘁ)).inv ≫
_ ◁ η_ X (Xᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ (Yᘁ) Y Z).inv ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ Z).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Yᘁ : C) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ g) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [rightAdjointMate]; monoidal
| _ = _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def]; monoidal
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Rigid/Basic.lean | 206 | 207 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
/-!
# Derivative as the limit of the slope
In this file we relate the derivative of a function with its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`.
Since we are talking about functions taking values in a normed space instead of the base field, we
use `slope f x y = (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)` instead of division.
We also prove some estimates on the upper/lower limits of the slope in terms of the derivative.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`analysis/calculus/deriv/basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, slope
-/
universe u v
open scoped Topology
open Filter TopologicalSpace Set
section NormedField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s : Set 𝕜}
/-- If the domain has dimension one, then Fréchet derivative is equivalent to the classical
definition with a limit. In this version we have to take the limit along the subset `-{x}`,
because for `y=x` the slope equals zero due to the convention `0⁻¹=0`. -/
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜} :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 f') :=
calc HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L
↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - (y - x)⁻¹ • (y - x) • f') L (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto, ← norm_inv, ← norm_smul,
← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, slope_def_module, smul_sub]
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - (y - x)⁻¹ • (y - x) • f') (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 0) :=
.symm <| tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq <| by simp
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - f') (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 0) := tendsto_congr' <| by
refine (EqOn.eventuallyEq fun y hy ↦ ?_).filter_mono inf_le_right
rw [inv_smul_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 hy) f']
_ ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 f') := by
rw [← nhds_translation_sub f', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 f') := by
simp only [HasDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin, diff_eq, ← inf_assoc, inf_principal.symm]
exact hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' (hs : x ∉ s) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 f') := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope, diff_singleton_eq_self hs]
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope : HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[≠] x) (𝓝 f') :=
hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 f') := by
have : 𝓝[≠] x = Filter.map (fun t ↦ x + t) (𝓝[≠] 0) := by
simp [nhdsWithin, map_add_left_nhds_zero x, Filter.map_inf, add_right_injective x]
simp [hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope, this, slope, Function.comp_def]
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero
theorem HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsGT_le_nhdsNE 0)
theorem HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_left [Preorder 𝕜] (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[<] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhdsLT_le_nhdsNE 0)
/-- Given a set `t` such that `s ∩ t` is dense in `s`, then the range of `derivWithin f s` is
contained in the closure of the submodule spanned by the image of `t`. -/
theorem range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
(f : 𝕜 → F) {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s ⊆ closure (s ∩ t)) :
range (derivWithin f s) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (f '' t)) := by
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
by_cases H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x; swap
· simpa [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt H] using subset_closure (zero_mem _)
by_cases H' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x; swap
· rw [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt H']
exact subset_closure (zero_mem _)
have I : (𝓝[(s ∩ t) \ {x}] x).NeBot := by
rw [← accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, ← uniqueDiffWithinAt_iff_accPt]
exact H.mono_closure h
have : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[(s ∩ t) \ {x}] x) (𝓝 (derivWithin f s x)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left (hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope.1 H'.hasDerivWithinAt)
rw [inter_comm, inter_diff_assoc]
exact nhdsWithin_mono _ inter_subset_right
rw [← closure_closure, ← Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with y hy
simp only [slope, vsub_eq_sub, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.sub_mem _ ?_ ?_)
· apply Submodule.le_topologicalClosure
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hy.1.2
· apply Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span
suffices A : f x ∈ closure (f '' (s ∩ t)) from
closure_mono (image_subset _ inter_subset_right) A
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
· apply H'.continuousWithinAt.mono inter_subset_left
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot]
exact I.mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ diff_subset)
/-- Given a dense set `t`, then the range of `deriv f` is contained in the closure of the submodule
spanned by the image of `t`. -/
theorem range_deriv_subset_closure_span_image
(f : 𝕜 → F) {t : Set 𝕜} (h : Dense t) :
range (deriv f) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (f '' t)) := by
rw [← derivWithin_univ]
apply range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
simp [dense_iff_closure_eq.1 h]
theorem isSeparable_range_derivWithin [SeparableSpace 𝕜] (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) :
IsSeparable (range (derivWithin f s)) := by
obtain ⟨t, ts, t_count, ht⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Countable t ∧ s ⊆ closure t :=
(IsSeparable.of_separableSpace s).exists_countable_dense_subset
have : s ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) := by rwa [inter_eq_self_of_subset_right ts]
apply IsSeparable.mono _ (range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image f this)
exact (Countable.image t_count f).isSeparable.span.closure
theorem isSeparable_range_deriv [SeparableSpace 𝕜] (f : 𝕜 → F) :
IsSeparable (range (deriv f)) := by
rw [← derivWithin_univ]
exact isSeparable_range_derivWithin _ _
lemma HasDerivAt.continuousAt_div [DecidableEq 𝕜] {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c a : 𝕜} (hf : HasDerivAt f a c) :
ContinuousAt (Function.update (fun x ↦ (f x - f c) / (x - c)) c a) c := by
rw [← slope_fun_def_field]
exact continuousAt_update_same.mpr <| hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope.mp hf
end NormedField
/-! ### Upper estimates on liminf and limsup -/
section Real
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' : ℝ} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ} {r : ℝ}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_slope_le (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hr : f' < r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s \ {x}] x, slope f x z < r :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf (IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Iio hr)
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_slope_le' (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : x ∉ s)
(hr : f' < r) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s] x, slope f x z < r :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' hs).1 hf (IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Iio hr)
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.liminf_right_slope_le (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x)
(hr : f' < r) : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r :=
(hf.Ioi_of_Ici.limsup_slope_le' (lt_irrefl x) hr).frequently
end Real
section RealSpace
open Metric
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : E} {s : Set ℝ}
{x r : ℝ}
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ‖f'‖` the ratio
`‖f z - f x‖ / ‖z - x‖` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `‖f'‖`. -/
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_norm_slope_le (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hr : ‖f'‖ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s] x, ‖z - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f z - f x‖ < r := by
have hr₀ : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg f') hr
have A : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s \ {x}] x, ‖(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)‖ ∈ Iio r :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf).norm (IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Iio hr)
have B : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[{x}] x, ‖(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)‖ ∈ Iio r :=
mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| by simp [hr₀])
have C := mem_sup.2 ⟨A, B⟩
rw [← nhdsWithin_union, diff_union_self, nhdsWithin_union, mem_sup] at C
filter_upwards [C.1]
simp only [norm_smul, mem_Iio, norm_inv]
exact fun _ => id
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ‖f'‖` the ratio
`(‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / ‖z - x‖` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `‖f'‖`.
This lemma is a weaker version of `HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_norm_slope_le`
where `‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖` is replaced by `‖f z - f x‖`. -/
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_slope_norm_le (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hr : ‖f'‖ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s] x, ‖z - x‖⁻¹ * (‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) < r := by
apply (hf.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).mono
intro z hz
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_sub_norm_le _ _) ?_) hz
exact inv_nonneg.2 (norm_nonneg _)
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ‖f'‖` the ratio
`‖f z - f x‖ / ‖z - x‖` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
is less than or equal to `‖f'‖`. See also `HasDerivWithinAt.limsup_norm_slope_le`
for a stronger version using limit superior and any set `s`. -/
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.liminf_right_norm_slope_le (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x)
| (hr : ‖f'‖ < r) : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, ‖z - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f z - f x‖ < r :=
(hf.Ioi_of_Ici.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).frequently
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ‖f'‖` the ratio
`(‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x)` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Slope.lean | 215 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
| theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 515 | 517 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jiale Miao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jiale Miao, Kevin Buzzard, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
/-!
# Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization
In this file we introduce Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization.
The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span.
## Main results
- `gramSchmidt` : the Gram-Schmidt process
- `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` :
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors.
- `span_gramSchmidt` :
`gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors.
- `gramSchmidt_ne_zero` :
If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero.
- `gramSchmidt_basis` :
The basis produced by the Gram-Schmidt process when given a basis as input.
- `gramSchmidtNormed` :
the normalized `gramSchmidt` (i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.)
- `gramSchmidt_orthonormal` :
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors.
- `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis`: orthonormal basis constructed by the Gram-Schmidt process from
an indexed set of vectors of the right size
-/
open Finset Submodule Module
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [WellFoundedLT ι]
attribute [local instance] IsWellOrder.toHasWellFounded
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidt [WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
f n - ∑ i : Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt f i).orthogonalProjection (f n)
termination_by n
decreasing_by exact mem_Iio.1 i.2
/-- This lemma uses `∑ i in` instead of `∑ i :`. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_def (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n = f n - ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [← sum_attach, attach_eq_univ, gramSchmidt]
theorem gramSchmidt_def' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, sub_add_cancel]
theorem gramSchmidt_def'' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n,
(⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i, f n⟫ / (‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i := by
convert gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f n
rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton, RCLike.ofReal_pow]
@[simp]
theorem gramSchmidt_zero {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrder ι] [OrderBot ι]
[WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f ⊥ = f ⊥ := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, Iio_eq_Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, sub_zero]
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation**:
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthogonal (f : ι → E) {a b : ι} (h₀ : a ≠ b) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := by
suffices ∀ a b : ι, a < b → ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 by
rcases h₀.lt_or_lt with ha | hb
· exact this _ _ ha
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact this _ _ hb
clear h₀ a b
intro a b h₀
revert a
apply wellFounded_lt.induction b
intro b ih a h₀
simp only [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f b, inner_sub_right, inner_sum, orthogonalProjection_singleton,
inner_smul_right]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem a (Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h₀)]
· by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a = 0
· simp only [h, inner_zero_left, zero_div, zero_mul, sub_zero]
· rw [RCLike.ofReal_pow, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, div_mul_cancel₀, sub_self]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
intro i hi hia
simp only [mul_eq_zero, div_eq_zero_iff, inner_self_eq_zero]
right
rcases hia.lt_or_lt with hia₁ | hia₂
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact ih a h₀ i hia₁
· exact ih i (mem_Iio.1 hi) a hia₂
/-- This is another version of `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` using `Pairwise` instead. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_pairwise_orthogonal (f : ι → E) :
Pairwise fun a b => ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
theorem gramSchmidt_inv_triangular (v : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 v j, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def'' 𝕜 v]
simp only [inner_add_right, inner_sum, inner_smul_right]
set b : ι → E := gramSchmidt 𝕜 v
convert zero_add (0 : 𝕜)
· exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v hij.ne'
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro k hki'
have hki : k < i := by simpa using hki'
have : ⟪b j, b k⟫ = 0 := gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v (hki.trans hij).ne'
simp [this]
open Submodule Set Order
theorem mem_span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hij)
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => smul_mem (span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j)) _ <|
subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) <| (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).le.trans hij)
theorem gramSchmidt_mem_span (f : ι → E) :
∀ {j i}, i ≤ j → gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) := by
intro j i hij
rw [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
refine Submodule.sub_mem _ (subset_span (mem_image_of_mem _ hij))
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_)
let hkj : k < j := (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).trans_le hij
exact smul_mem _ _
(span_mono (image_subset f <| Set.Iic_subset_Iic.2 hkj.le) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ le_rfl)
termination_by j => j
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iic (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iio (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iio c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
/-- `gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors. -/
theorem span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) : span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range f) :=
span_eq_span (range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
theorem gramSchmidt_of_orthogonal {f : ι → E} (hf : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪f i, f j⟫ = 0) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f = f := by
ext i
rw [gramSchmidt_def]
trans f i - 0
· congr
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j hj
rw [Submodule.coe_eq_zero]
suffices span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) ⟂ 𝕜 ∙ f i by
apply orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero
rw [mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
rw [← mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right]
exact this (gramSchmidt_mem_span 𝕜 f (le_refl j))
rw [isOrtho_span]
rintro u ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ v (rfl : v = f i)
apply hf
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt hk (Finset.mem_Iio.mp hj)).ne
· simp
variable {𝕜}
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
have h₁ : f n ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio n) := by
rw [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 f n, gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f, h, zero_add]
apply Submodule.sum_mem _ _
intro a ha
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_Iio, orthogonalProjection_singleton]
apply Submodule.smul_mem _ _ _
rw [Finset.mem_Iio] at ha
exact subset_span ⟨a, ha, by rfl⟩
have h₂ : (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι)) ⟨n, le_refl n⟩ ∈
span 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι) '' Set.Iio ⟨n, le_refl n⟩) := by
rw [image_comp]
simpa using h₁
apply LinearIndependent.not_mem_span_image h₀ _ h₂
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_iff]
/-- If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 :=
gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces a triangular matrix of vectors when given a basis. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_triangular {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i) j = 0 := by
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b '' Set.Iio j) :=
subset_span ((Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨i, hij, rfl⟩)
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (b '' Set.Iio j) := by rwa [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 b j]
have : ↑(b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i)).support ⊆ Set.Iio j :=
Basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span b (Set.Iio j) this
exact (Finsupp.mem_supported' _ _).1 ((Finsupp.mem_supported 𝕜 _).2 this) j Set.not_mem_Iio_self
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces linearly independent vectors when given linearly independent vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_linearIndependent {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
LinearIndependent 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) :=
linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun _ => gramSchmidt_ne_zero _ h₀) fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
/-- When given a basis, `gramSchmidt` produces a basis. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : Basis ι 𝕜 E :=
Basis.mk (gramSchmidt_linearIndependent b.linearIndependent)
((span_gramSchmidt 𝕜 b).trans b.span_eq).ge
theorem coe_gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : (gramSchmidtBasis b : ι → E) = gramSchmidt 𝕜 b :=
Basis.coe_mk _ _
variable (𝕜) in
/-- the normalized `gramSchmidt`
(i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.) -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
(‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹ • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : ‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
simp only [gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe n h₀, gramSchmidtNormed, norm_smul_inv_norm, Ne,
not_false_iff]
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 :=
gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' {f : ι → E} {n : ι} (hn : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n ≠ 0) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
rw [gramSchmidtNormed] at *
rw [norm_smul_inv_norm]
simpa using hn
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` applied to a linearly independent set of vectors produces an orthornormal
system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) := by
unfold Orthonormal
constructor
· simp only [gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length, h₀, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
· intro i j hij
simp only [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, RCLike.conj_inv,
RCLike.conj_ofReal, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
repeat' right
exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors after removing the vectors which
become zero in the process. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal' (f : ι → E) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 fun i : { i | gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0 } => gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i := by
refine ⟨fun i => gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' i.prop, ?_⟩
rintro i j (hij : ¬_)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at hij
simp [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij]
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (s : Set ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f '' s) = span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' s) := by
refine span_eq_span
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi => smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| singleton_subset_set_iff.2 hi) ?_)
simp only [coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i = 0
· simp [h]
· refine mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖, smul_inv_smul₀ ?_ _⟩
exact mod_cast norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed_range (f : ι → E) :
span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) := by
simpa only [image_univ.symm] using span_gramSchmidtNormed f univ
section OrthonormalBasis
variable [Fintype ι] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (h : finrank 𝕜 E = Fintype.card ι) (f : ι → E)
/-- Given an indexed family `f : ι → E` of vectors in an inner product space `E`, for which the
size of the index set is the dimension of `E`, produce an orthonormal basis for `E` which agrees
with the orthonormal set produced by the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process on the elements of
| `ι` for which this process gives a nonzero number. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis : OrthonormalBasis ι 𝕜 E :=
((gramSchmidt_orthonormal' f).exists_orthonormalBasis_extension_of_card_eq
(v := gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) h).choose
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply {f : ι → E} {i : ι} (hi : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/GramSchmidtOrtho.lean | 300 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# Additive operations on derivatives
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* sum of finitely many functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant
* negative of a function
* subtraction of two functions
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : E → F}
variable {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s : Set E}
variable {L : Filter E}
section ConstSMul
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
/-! ### Derivative of a function multiplied by a constant -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_smul (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (c : R) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.const_smul (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : R) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c • f y := fun x => (h x).const_smul c
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (c • f) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_const_smul hxs h c
theorem fderiv_const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_const_smul' (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (c • f) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
end ConstSMul
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun y => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.add (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.add (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.add (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + g y := fun x => (hf x).add (hg x)
theorem fderivWithin_add (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_add' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f + g) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
fderivWithin_add hxs hf hg
theorem fderiv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderiv_add' (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (f + g) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
fderiv_add hf hg
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simp [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO]
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.add_const⟩ := differentiableOn_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_add_const_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + c) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.add_const⟩ := differentiable_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical simp [fderivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_add_const (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_add_const]
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (c + f ·) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (c + f ·) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.const_add⟩ := differentiableOn_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_const_add_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c + f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.const_add⟩ := differentiable_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_const_add (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using fderivWithin_add_const c
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_const_add (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [add_comm c, fderiv_add_const]
end Add
section Sum
/-! ### Derivative of a finite sum of functions -/
variable {ι : Type*} {u : Finset ι} {A : ι → E → F} {A' : ι → E →L[𝕜] F}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x := by
simp only [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAtFilter (A i) (A' i) x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt (A i) (A' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt <|
HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt <| HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (A i) s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s := fun x hx =>
DifferentiableWithinAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x hx
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, Differentiable 𝕜 (A i)) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y := fun x => DifferentiableAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x
theorem fderivWithin_sum (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderivWithin 𝕜 (A i) s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderiv 𝕜 (A i) x :=
(HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
end Sum
section Neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.neg (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.neg (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => -f x) (-f') x L :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.neg (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.neg (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.neg (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_neg_iff :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.neg (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.neg.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_neg_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.neg (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_neg_iff : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.neg (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y := fun x =>
(h x).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_neg_iff : (Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
theorem fderivWithin_neg (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.fderivWithin hxs
· rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, neg_zero]
simpa
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_neg' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (-f) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_neg hxs
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_neg : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_neg uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ]
/-- Version of `fderiv_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_neg' : fderiv 𝕜 (-f) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
fderiv_neg
end Neg
section Sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sub (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableAt_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, hg, add_iff_right, differentiableAt_neg_iff]
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_right]
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - g y := fun x => (hf x).sub (hg x)
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_right (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 g := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.sub_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
| simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Add.lean | 556 | 558 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Pseudo.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Products of pseudometric spaces and other constructions
This file constructs the supremum distance on binary products of pseudometric spaces and provides
instances for type synonyms.
-/
open Bornology Filter Metric Set Topology
open scoped NNReal
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- Pseudometric space structure pulled back by a function. -/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoMetricSpace β) :
PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist x y := dist (f x) (f y)
dist_self _ := dist_self _
dist_comm _ _ := dist_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := dist_triangle _ _ _
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_dist _ _ := edist_dist _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := (uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).eq_biInf
toBornology := Bornology.induced f
cobounded_sets := Set.ext fun s => mem_comap_iff_compl.trans <| by
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff, forall_mem_image, mem_setOf]
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by an inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `TopologicalSpace`
structure. -/
def Topology.IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
[m : PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceTopology (.induced f m) hf.eq_induced
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace := IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by a uniform inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `UniformSpace`
structure. -/
def IsUniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [UniformSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f : α → β) (h : IsUniformInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceUniformity (.induced f m) h.comap_uniformity.symm
instance Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace {p : α → Prop} : PseudoMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
lemma Subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : dist x y = dist (x : α) y := rfl
lemma Subtype.nndist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : nndist x y = nndist (x : α) y := rfl
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : dist (unop x) (unop y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_op (x y : α) : dist (op x) (op y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : nndist (unop x) (unop y) = nndist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_op (x y : α) : nndist (op x) (op y) = nndist x y := rfl
end MulOpposite
section NNReal
instance : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ≥0 := Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
lemma NNReal.dist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : dist a b = |(a : ℝ) - b| := rfl
lemma NNReal.nndist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ => by
simp only [max_le_iff, tsub_le_iff_right (α := ℝ≥0)]
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nndist, dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff,
tsub_le_iff_right, NNReal.coe_add]
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist 0 z = z := by
simp only [NNReal.nndist_eq, max_eq_right, tsub_zero, zero_tsub, zero_le']
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val' (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist z 0 = z := by
rw [nndist_comm]
exact NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val z
lemma NNReal.le_add_nndist (a b : ℝ≥0) : a ≤ b + nndist a b := by
suffices (a : ℝ) ≤ (b : ℝ) + dist a b by
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_nndist]
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact le_of_abs_le (dist_eq a b).ge
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Ico 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico (c : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Ico 0 c.toNNReal := by
by_cases c_pos : 0 < c
· convert NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' ⟨c, c_pos.le⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_pos.le]
simp [not_lt.mp c_pos]
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Icc 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc {c : ℝ} (c_nn : 0 ≤ c) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Icc 0 c.toNNReal := by
convert NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' ⟨c, c_nn⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_nn]
end NNReal
namespace ULift
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ULift β) := PseudoMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
lemma dist_eq (x y : ULift β) : dist x y = dist x.down y.down := rfl
lemma nndist_eq (x y : ULift β) : nndist x y = nndist x.down y.down := rfl
@[simp] lemma dist_up_up (x y : β) : dist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = dist x y := rfl
@[simp] lemma nndist_up_up (x y : β) : nndist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = nndist x y := rfl
end ULift
section Prod
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax : PseudoMetricSpace (α × β) :=
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun x y : α × β => dist x.1 y.1 ⊔ dist x.2 y.2)
(fun _ _ => (max_lt (edist_lt_top _ _) (edist_lt_top _ _)).ne) fun x y => by
simp only [dist_edist, ← ENNReal.toReal_max (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
Prod.edist_eq]
i.replaceBornology fun s => by
simp only [← isBounded_image_fst_and_snd, isBounded_iff_eventually, forall_mem_image, ←
eventually_and, ← forall_and, ← max_le_iff]
rfl
lemma Prod.dist_eq {x y : α × β} : dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_left {x : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} : dist (x, y₁) (x, y₂) = dist y₁ y₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_right {x₁ x₂ : α} {y : β} : dist (x₁, y) (x₂, y) = dist x₁ x₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
lemma ball_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) : ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma closedBall_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r := ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma sphere_prod (x : α × β) (r : ℝ) :
sphere x r = sphere x.1 r ×ˢ closedBall x.2 r ∪ closedBall x.1 r ×ˢ sphere x.2 r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· cases x
simp_rw [← closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, union_self, closedBall_prod_same]
· ext ⟨x', y'⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_prod, Metric.mem_closedBall, Metric.mem_sphere, Prod.dist_eq,
max_eq_iff]
refine or_congr (and_congr_right ?_) (and_comm.trans (and_congr_left ?_))
all_goals rintro rfl; rfl
end Prod
lemma uniformContinuous_dist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a b} h =>
calc dist (dist a.1 a.2) (dist b.1 b.2) ≤ dist a.1 b.1 + dist a.2 b.2 :=
dist_dist_dist_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ dist a b + dist a b := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
_ < ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_lt_add h h
_ = ε := add_halves ε⟩
|
protected lemma UniformContinuous.dist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Constructions.lean | 195 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
/-!
# Instances and theorems on pi types
This file provides instances for the typeclass defined in `Algebra.Group.Defs`. More sophisticated
instances are defined in `Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas` files elsewhere.
## Porting note
This file relied on the `pi_instance` tactic, which was not available at the time of porting. The
comment `--pi_instance` is inserted before all fields which were previously derived by
`pi_instance`. See this Zulip discussion:
[https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/not.20porting.20pi_instance]
-/
-- We enforce to only import `Algebra.Group.Defs` and basic logic
assert_not_exists Set.range MonoidHom MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u v₁ v₂ v₃
variable {I : Type u}
-- The indexing type
variable {α β γ : Type*}
-- The families of types already equipped with instances
variable {f : I → Type v₁} {g : I → Type v₂} {h : I → Type v₃}
variable (x y : ∀ i, f i) (i : I)
namespace Pi
@[to_additive]
instance semigroup [∀ i, Semigroup (f i)] : Semigroup (∀ i, f i) where
mul_assoc := by intros; ext; exact mul_assoc _ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance commSemigroup [∀ i, CommSemigroup (f i)] : CommSemigroup (∀ i, f i) where
mul_comm := by intros; ext; exact mul_comm _ _
@[to_additive]
instance mulOneClass [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] : MulOneClass (∀ i, f i) where
one_mul := by intros; ext; exact one_mul _
mul_one := by intros; ext; exact mul_one _
@[to_additive]
instance invOneClass [∀ i, InvOneClass (f i)] : InvOneClass (∀ i, f i) where
inv_one := by ext; exact inv_one
@[to_additive]
instance monoid [∀ i, Monoid (f i)] : Monoid (∀ i, f i) where
__ := semigroup
__ := mulOneClass
npow := fun n x i => x i ^ n
npow_zero := by intros; ext; exact Monoid.npow_zero _
npow_succ := by intros; ext; exact Monoid.npow_succ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance commMonoid [∀ i, CommMonoid (f i)] : CommMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ monoid, commSemigroup with }
@[to_additive Pi.subNegMonoid]
instance divInvMonoid [∀ i, DivInvMonoid (f i)] : DivInvMonoid (∀ i, f i) where
zpow := fun z x i => x i ^ z
div_eq_mul_inv := by intros; ext; exact div_eq_mul_inv _ _
zpow_zero' := by intros; ext; exact DivInvMonoid.zpow_zero' _
zpow_succ' := by intros; ext; exact DivInvMonoid.zpow_succ' _ _
zpow_neg' := by intros; ext; exact DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
@[to_additive]
instance divInvOneMonoid [∀ i, DivInvOneMonoid (f i)] : DivInvOneMonoid (∀ i, f i) where
inv_one := by ext; exact inv_one
@[to_additive]
instance involutiveInv [∀ i, InvolutiveInv (f i)] : InvolutiveInv (∀ i, f i) where
inv_inv := by intros; ext; exact inv_inv _
@[to_additive]
instance divisionMonoid [∀ i, DivisionMonoid (f i)] : DivisionMonoid (∀ i, f i) where
__ := divInvMonoid
__ := involutiveInv
mul_inv_rev := by intros; ext; exact mul_inv_rev _ _
inv_eq_of_mul := by intros _ _ h; ext; exact DivisionMonoid.inv_eq_of_mul _ _ (congrFun h _)
@[to_additive instSubtractionCommMonoid]
instance divisionCommMonoid [∀ i, DivisionCommMonoid (f i)] : DivisionCommMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ divisionMonoid, commSemigroup with }
@[to_additive]
instance group [∀ i, Group (f i)] : Group (∀ i, f i) where
inv_mul_cancel := by intros; ext; exact inv_mul_cancel _
@[to_additive]
instance commGroup [∀ i, CommGroup (f i)] : CommGroup (∀ i, f i) := { group, commMonoid with }
@[to_additive] instance instIsLeftCancelMul [∀ i, Mul (f i)] [∀ i, IsLeftCancelMul (f i)] :
IsLeftCancelMul (∀ i, f i) where
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ h := funext fun _ ↦ mul_left_cancel (congr_fun h _)
@[to_additive] instance instIsRightCancelMul [∀ i, Mul (f i)] [∀ i, IsRightCancelMul (f i)] :
IsRightCancelMul (∀ i, f i) where
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ h := funext fun _ ↦ mul_right_cancel (congr_fun h _)
@[to_additive] instance instIsCancelMul [∀ i, Mul (f i)] [∀ i, IsCancelMul (f i)] :
IsCancelMul (∀ i, f i) where
@[to_additive]
instance leftCancelSemigroup [∀ i, LeftCancelSemigroup (f i)] : LeftCancelSemigroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ semigroup with mul_left_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_left_cancel }
@[to_additive]
instance rightCancelSemigroup [∀ i, RightCancelSemigroup (f i)] : RightCancelSemigroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ semigroup with mul_right_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_right_cancel }
@[to_additive]
instance leftCancelMonoid [∀ i, LeftCancelMonoid (f i)] : LeftCancelMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ leftCancelSemigroup, monoid with }
@[to_additive]
instance rightCancelMonoid [∀ i, RightCancelMonoid (f i)] : RightCancelMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ rightCancelSemigroup, monoid with }
@[to_additive]
instance cancelMonoid [∀ i, CancelMonoid (f i)] : CancelMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ leftCancelMonoid, rightCancelMonoid with }
@[to_additive]
instance cancelCommMonoid [∀ i, CancelCommMonoid (f i)] : CancelCommMonoid (∀ i, f i) :=
{ leftCancelMonoid, commMonoid with }
section
variable [DecidableEq I]
variable [∀ i, One (f i)] [∀ i, One (g i)] [∀ i, One (h i)]
/-- The function supported at `i`, with value `x` there, and `1` elsewhere. -/
@[to_additive "The function supported at `i`, with value `x` there, and `0` elsewhere."]
def mulSingle (i : I) (x : f i) : ∀ (j : I), f j :=
Function.update 1 i x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_eq_same (i : I) (x : f i) : mulSingle i x i = x :=
Function.update_self i x _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_eq_of_ne {i i' : I} (h : i' ≠ i) (x : f i) : mulSingle i x i' = 1 :=
Function.update_of_ne h x _
/-- Abbreviation for `mulSingle_eq_of_ne h.symm`, for ease of use by `simp`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Abbreviation for `single_eq_of_ne h.symm`, for ease of use by `simp`."]
theorem mulSingle_eq_of_ne' {i i' : I} (h : i ≠ i') (x : f i) : mulSingle i x i' = 1 :=
mulSingle_eq_of_ne h.symm x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_one (i : I) : mulSingle i (1 : f i) = 1 :=
Function.update_eq_self _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_eq_one_iff {i : I} {x : f i} : mulSingle i x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ mulSingle_one i⟩
rw [← mulSingle_eq_same i x, h, one_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSingle_ne_one_iff {i : I} {x : f i} : mulSingle i x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
mulSingle_eq_one_iff.ne
-- Porting note:
-- 1) Why do I have to specify the type of `mulSingle i x` explicitly?
-- 2) Why do I have to specify the type of `(1 : I → β)`?
-- 3) Removed `{β : Sort*}` as `[One β]` converts it to a type anyways.
/-- On non-dependent functions, `Pi.mulSingle` can be expressed as an `ite` -/
@[to_additive "On non-dependent functions, `Pi.single` can be expressed as an `ite`"]
theorem mulSingle_apply [One β] (i : I) (x : β) (i' : I) :
(mulSingle i x : I → β) i' = if i' = i then x else 1 :=
Function.update_apply (1 : I → β) i x i'
-- Porting note: Same as above.
/-- On non-dependent functions, `Pi.mulSingle` is symmetric in the two indices. -/
@[to_additive "On non-dependent functions, `Pi.single` is symmetric in the two indices."]
theorem mulSingle_comm [One β] (i : I) (x : β) (i' : I) :
(mulSingle i x : I → β) i' = (mulSingle i' x : I → β) i := by
simp [mulSingle_apply, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_mulSingle (f' : ∀ i, f i → g i) (hf' : ∀ i, f' i 1 = 1) (i : I) (x : f i) (j : I) :
f' j (mulSingle i x j) = mulSingle i (f' i x) j := by
simpa only [Pi.one_apply, hf', mulSingle] using Function.apply_update f' 1 i x j
@[to_additive apply_single₂]
theorem apply_mulSingle₂ (f' : ∀ i, f i → g i → h i) (hf' : ∀ i, f' i 1 1 = 1) (i : I)
(x : f i) (y : g i) (j : I) :
f' j (mulSingle i x j) (mulSingle i y j) = mulSingle i (f' i x y) j := by
by_cases h : j = i
· subst h
simp only [mulSingle_eq_same]
· simp only [mulSingle_eq_of_ne h, hf']
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSingle_op {g : I → Type*} [∀ i, One (g i)] (op : ∀ i, f i → g i)
(h : ∀ i, op i 1 = 1) (i : I) (x : f i) :
mulSingle i (op i x) = fun j => op j (mulSingle i x j) :=
Eq.symm <| funext <| apply_mulSingle op h i x
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSingle_op₂ {g₁ g₂ : I → Type*} [∀ i, One (g₁ i)] [∀ i, One (g₂ i)]
(op : ∀ i, g₁ i → g₂ i → f i) (h : ∀ i, op i 1 1 = 1) (i : I) (x₁ : g₁ i) (x₂ : g₂ i) :
mulSingle i (op i x₁ x₂) = fun j => op j (mulSingle i x₁ j) (mulSingle i x₂ j) :=
Eq.symm <| funext <| apply_mulSingle₂ op h i x₁ x₂
variable (f)
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSingle_injective (i : I) : Function.Injective (mulSingle i : f i → ∀ i, f i) :=
Function.update_injective _ i
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_inj (i : I) {x y : f i} : mulSingle i x = mulSingle i y ↔ x = y :=
(Pi.mulSingle_injective _ _).eq_iff
end
/-- The mapping into a product type built from maps into each component. -/
@[simp]
protected def prod (f' : ∀ i, f i) (g' : ∀ i, g i) (i : I) : f i × g i :=
(f' i, g' i)
-- Porting note: simp now unfolds the lhs, so we are not marking these as simp.
-- @[simp]
theorem prod_fst_snd : Pi.prod (Prod.fst : α × β → α) (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = id :=
rfl
-- Porting note: simp now unfolds the lhs, so we are not marking these as simp.
-- @[simp]
theorem prod_snd_fst : Pi.prod (Prod.snd : α × β → β) (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = Prod.swap :=
rfl
end Pi
namespace Function
section Extend
@[to_additive]
theorem extend_one [One γ] (f : α → β) : Function.extend f (1 : α → γ) (1 : β → γ) = 1 :=
funext fun _ => by apply ite_self
@[to_additive]
theorem extend_mul [Mul γ] (f : α → β) (g₁ g₂ : α → γ) (e₁ e₂ : β → γ) :
Function.extend f (g₁ * g₂) (e₁ * e₂) = Function.extend f g₁ e₁ * Function.extend f g₂ e₂ := by
classical
funext x
simp only [not_exists, extend_def, Pi.mul_apply, apply_dite₂, dite_eq_ite, ite_self]
-- Porting note: The Lean3 statement was
-- `funext <| λ _, by convert (apply_dite2 (*) _ _ _ _ _).symm`
-- which converts to
-- `funext fun _ => by convert (apply_dite₂ (· * ·) _ _ _ _ _).symm`
-- However this does not work, and we're not sure why.
@[to_additive]
theorem extend_inv [Inv γ] (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e : β → γ) :
Function.extend f g⁻¹ e⁻¹ = (Function.extend f g e)⁻¹ := by
classical
funext x
simp only [not_exists, extend_def, Pi.inv_apply, apply_dite Inv.inv]
-- Porting note: The Lean3 statement was
-- `funext <| λ _, by convert (apply_dite has_inv.inv _ _ _).symm`
-- which converts to
-- `funext fun _ => by convert (apply_dite Inv.inv _ _ _).symm`
-- However this does not work, and we're not sure why.
@[to_additive]
theorem extend_div [Div γ] (f : α → β) (g₁ g₂ : α → γ) (e₁ e₂ : β → γ) :
Function.extend f (g₁ / g₂) (e₁ / e₂) = Function.extend f g₁ e₁ / Function.extend f g₂ e₂ := by
classical
funext x
simp [Function.extend_def, apply_dite₂]
-- Porting note: The Lean3 statement was
-- `funext <| λ _, by convert (apply_dite2 (/) _ _ _ _ _).symm`
-- which converts to
-- `funext fun _ => by convert (apply_dite₂ (· / ·) _ _ _ _ _).symm`
-- However this does not work, and we're not sure why.
end Extend
lemma comp_eq_const_iff (b : β) (f : α → β) {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
g ∘ f = Function.const _ (g b) ↔ f = Function.const _ b :=
hg.comp_left.eq_iff' rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma comp_eq_one_iff [One β] [One γ] (f : α → β) {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) (hg0 : g 1 = 1) :
g ∘ f = 1 ↔ f = 1 := by
simpa [hg0, const_one] using comp_eq_const_iff 1 f hg
@[to_additive]
lemma comp_ne_one_iff [One β] [One γ] (f : α → β) {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) (hg0 : g 1 = 1) :
g ∘ f ≠ 1 ↔ f ≠ 1 :=
(comp_eq_one_iff f hg hg0).ne
end Function
/-- If the one function is surjective, the codomain is trivial. -/
@[to_additive "If the zero function is surjective, the codomain is trivial."]
def uniqueOfSurjectiveOne (α : Type*) {β : Type*} [One β] (h : Function.Surjective (1 : α → β)) :
Unique β :=
h.uniqueOfSurjectiveConst α (1 : β)
@[to_additive]
theorem Subsingleton.pi_mulSingle_eq {α : Type*} [DecidableEq I] [Subsingleton I] [One α]
(i : I) (x : α) : Pi.mulSingle i x = fun _ => x :=
funext fun j => by rw [Subsingleton.elim j i, Pi.mulSingle_eq_same]
namespace Sum
variable (a a' : α → γ) (b b' : β → γ)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem elim_one_one [One γ] : Sum.elim (1 : α → γ) (1 : β → γ) = 1 :=
Sum.elim_const_const 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem elim_mulSingle_one [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [One γ] (i : α) (c : γ) :
Sum.elim (Pi.mulSingle i c) (1 : β → γ) = Pi.mulSingle (Sum.inl i) c := by
simp only [Pi.mulSingle, Sum.elim_update_left, elim_one_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem elim_one_mulSingle [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [One γ] (i : β) (c : γ) :
Sum.elim (1 : α → γ) (Pi.mulSingle i c) = Pi.mulSingle (Sum.inr i) c := by
simp only [Pi.mulSingle, Sum.elim_update_right, elim_one_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem elim_inv_inv [Inv γ] : Sum.elim a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = (Sum.elim a b)⁻¹ :=
(Sum.comp_elim Inv.inv a b).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem elim_mul_mul [Mul γ] : Sum.elim (a * a') (b * b') = Sum.elim a b * Sum.elim a' b' := by
ext x
cases x <;> rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem elim_div_div [Div γ] : Sum.elim (a / a') (b / b') = Sum.elim a b / Sum.elim a' b' := by
ext x
cases x <;> rfl
end Sum
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Pi/Basic.lean | 602 | 604 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Yaël Dillies, Jineon Baek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem
This file states Fermat's Last Theorem. We provide a statement over a general semiring with
specific exponent, along with the usual statement over the naturals.
## Main definitions
* `FermatLastTheoremWith R n`: The statement that only solutions to the Fermat
equation `a^n + b^n = c^n` in the semiring `R` have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`.
Note that this statement can certainly be false for certain values of `R` and `n`.
For example `FermatLastTheoremWith ℝ 3` is false as `1^3 + 1^3 = (2^{1/3})^3`, and
`FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ 2` is false, as 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2.
* `FermatLastTheoremFor n` : The statement that the only solutions to `a^n + b^n = c^n` in `ℕ`
have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`. Again, this statement is not always true, for
example `FermatLastTheoremFor 1` is false because `2^1 + 2^1 = 4^1`.
* `FermatLastTheorem` : The statement of Fermat's Last Theorem, namely that the only solutions to
`a^n + b^n = c^n` in `ℕ` when `n ≥ 3` have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`.
## History
Fermat's Last Theorem was an open problem in number theory for hundreds of years, until it was
finally solved by Andrew Wiles, assisted by Richard Taylor, in 1994 (see
[A. Wiles, *Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem*][Wiles-FLT] and
[R. Taylor and A. Wiles, *Ring-theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras*][Taylor-Wiles-FLT]).
An ongoing Lean formalisation of the proof, using mathlib as a dependency, is taking place at
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/FLT .
-/
open List
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem over a given semiring with a specific exponent. -/
def FermatLastTheoremWith (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ a b c : R, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → a ^ n + b ^ n ≠ c ^ n
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem over the naturals for a given exponent. -/
def FermatLastTheoremFor (n : ℕ) : Prop := FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem: `a ^ n + b ^ n = c ^ n` has no nontrivial natural solution
when `n ≥ 3`.
This is now a theorem of Wiles and Taylor--Wiles; see
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/FLT for an ongoing Lean formalisation of
a proof. -/
def FermatLastTheorem : Prop := ∀ n ≥ 3, FermatLastTheoremFor n
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_zero : FermatLastTheoremFor 0 :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ _ ↦ by norm_num
lemma not_fermatLastTheoremFor_one : ¬ FermatLastTheoremFor 1 :=
fun h ↦ h 1 1 2 (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
lemma not_fermatLastTheoremFor_two : ¬ FermatLastTheoremFor 2 :=
fun h ↦ h 3 4 5 (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {m n : ℕ}
lemma FermatLastTheoremWith.mono (hmn : m ∣ n) (hm : FermatLastTheoremWith R m) :
FermatLastTheoremWith R n := by
rintro a b c ha hb hc
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hmn
simp_rw [pow_mul']
refine hm _ _ _ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> exact pow_ne_zero _ ‹_›
lemma FermatLastTheoremFor.mono (hmn : m ∣ n) (hm : FermatLastTheoremFor m) :
FermatLastTheoremFor n := by
exact FermatLastTheoremWith.mono hmn hm
lemma fermatLastTheoremWith_nat_int_rat_tfae (n : ℕ) :
TFAE [FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n, FermatLastTheoremWith ℤ n, FermatLastTheoremWith ℚ n] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2
| h, a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, habc => by
obtain hn | hn := n.even_or_odd
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [hn.pow_abs, habc]
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hb.lt_or_lt <;>
obtain hc | hc := hc.lt_or_lt
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_neg, neg_pow a, neg_pow b, neg_pow c, ← mul_add, habc, *]
· exact (by positivity : 0 < c ^ n).not_lt <| habc.symm.trans_lt <| add_neg (hn.pow_neg ha) <|
hn.pow_neg hb
· refine h b.natAbs c.natAbs a.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h a.natAbs c.natAbs b.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h c.natAbs a.natAbs b.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h c.natAbs b.natAbs a.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq, *]
· exact (by positivity : 0 < a ^ n + b ^ n).not_lt <| habc.trans_lt <| hn.pow_neg hc
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, habc, *]
tfae_have 2 → 3
| h, a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, habc => by
rw [← Rat.num_ne_zero] at ha hb hc
refine h (a.num * b.den * c.den) (a.den * b.num * c.den) (a.den * b.den * c.num)
(by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity) ?_
have : (a.den * b.den * c.den : ℚ) ^ n ≠ 0 := by positivity
refine Int.cast_injective <| (div_left_inj' this).1 ?_
push_cast
simp only [add_div, ← div_pow, mul_div_mul_comm, div_self (by positivity : (a.den : ℚ) ≠ 0),
div_self (by positivity : (b.den : ℚ) ≠ 0), div_self (by positivity : (c.den : ℚ) ≠ 0),
one_mul, mul_one, Rat.num_div_den, habc]
tfae_have 3 → 1
| h, a, b, c => mod_cast h a b c
tfae_finish
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_nat {n : ℕ} : FermatLastTheoremFor n ↔ FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n :=
Iff.rfl
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_int {n : ℕ} : FermatLastTheoremFor n ↔ FermatLastTheoremWith ℤ n :=
(fermatLastTheoremWith_nat_int_rat_tfae n).out 0 1
| lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_rat {n : ℕ} : FermatLastTheoremFor n ↔ FermatLastTheoremWith ℚ n :=
(fermatLastTheoremWith_nat_int_rat_tfae n).out 0 2
/--
A relaxed variant of Fermat's Last Theorem over a given commutative semiring with a specific
exponent, allowing nonzero solutions of units and their common multiples.
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Basic.lean | 147 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
/-- The directed sUnion of a set S of preconnected subsets is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
/-- Preconnectedness of the iUnion of a family of preconnected sets
indexed by the vertices of a preconnected graph,
where two vertices are joined when the corresponding sets intersect. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
section SuccOrder
open Order
variable [LinearOrder β] [SuccOrder β] [IsSuccArchimedean β]
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is connected. -/
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_chain [Nonempty β] {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of preconnected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (ht : OrdConnected t)
(H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
have h1 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj (Ico_subset_Icc_self hk)
have h2 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → succ k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj ⟨hk.1.trans <| le_succ _, succ_le_of_lt hk.2⟩
have h3 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → (s k ∩ s (succ k)).Nonempty :=
fun hi hj hk => K _ (h1 hi hj hk) (h2 hi hj hk)
refine IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun i hi j hj => ?_
exact reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun k hk => ⟨h3 hi hj hk, h1 hi hj hk⟩) fun k hk =>
⟨by rw [inter_comm]; exact h3 hj hi hk, h2 hj hi hk⟩
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (hnt : t.Nonempty)
(ht : OrdConnected t) (H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨hnt.some, hnt.some_mem, (H _ hnt.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain ht (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
end SuccOrder
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a preconnected set and its closure, then it is
preconnected as well. See also `IsConnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a connected set and its closure, then it is
connected as well. See also `IsPreconnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
/-- The closure of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
/-- The closure of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
/-- The image of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
/-- The image of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPreconnected_image := IsInducing.isPreconnected_image
/- TODO: The following lemmas about connection of preimages hold more generally for strict maps
(the quotient and subspace topologies of the image agree) whose fibers are preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) := fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f)
(hsf : s ⊆ range f) : IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2 fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_or_subset (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v) (huv : Disjoint u v)
(hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hs : IsPreconnected s) : s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v := by
specialize hs u v hu hv hsuv
obtain hsu | hsu := (s ∩ u).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Or.inr ((Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.2 hsu).subset_right_of_subset_union hsuv)
· replace hs := mt (hs hsu)
simp_rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 huv] at hs
exact Or.inl ((hs s.disjoint_empty).subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_left_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsu : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ u :=
Disjoint.subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv
(by
by_contra hsv
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] at hsv
obtain ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := hs u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 huv hx)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_right_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsv : (s ∩ v).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ v :=
hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hv hu huv.symm (union_comm u v ▸ hsuv) hsv
/-- If a preconnected set `s` intersects an open set `u`, and limit points of `u` inside `s` are
contained in `u`, then the whole set `s` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_of_closure_inter_subset (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hu : IsOpen u)
(h'u : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (h : closure u ∩ s ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u := by
have A : s ⊆ u ∪ (closure u)ᶜ := by
intro x hx
by_cases xu : x ∈ u
· exact Or.inl xu
· right
intro h'x
exact xu (h (mem_inter h'x hx))
apply hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hu isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl _ A h'u
exact disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure)
theorem IsPreconnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ×ˢ t) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Prod.mk a₁ '' t ∪ flip Prod.mk b₂ '' s, ?_, .inl ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩, .inr ⟨a₂, ha₂, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro _ (⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ | ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨ha₁, hy⟩, ⟨hx, hb₂⟩]
· exact (ht.image _ (by fun_prop)).union (a₁, b₂) ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩
⟨a₁, ha₁, rfl⟩ (hs.image _ (Continuous.prodMk_left _).continuousOn)
theorem IsConnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
(ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ×ˢ t) :=
⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
theorem isPreconnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)}
(hs : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (pi univ s) := by
rintro u v uo vo hsuv ⟨f, hfs, hfu⟩ ⟨g, hgs, hgv⟩
classical
rcases exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds hfu) g with ⟨I, hI⟩
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty =>
refine ⟨g, hgs, ⟨?_, hgv⟩⟩
simpa using hI
| insert i I _ ihI =>
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert] at hI
have := I.piecewise_mem_set_pi hfs hgs
refine (hsuv this).elim ihI fun h => ?_
set S := update (I.piecewise f g) i '' s i
have hsub : S ⊆ pi univ s := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun z hz => ?_
rwa [update_preimage_univ_pi]
exact fun j _ => this j trivial
have hconn : IsPreconnected S :=
(hs i).image _ (continuous_const.update i continuous_id).continuousOn
have hSu : (S ∩ u).Nonempty := ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (hfs _ trivial), hI⟩
have hSv : (S ∩ v).Nonempty := ⟨_, ⟨_, this _ trivial, update_eq_self _ _⟩, h⟩
refine (hconn u v uo vo (hsub.trans hsuv) hSu hSv).mono ?_
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hsub
@[simp]
theorem isConnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
IsConnected (pi univ s) ↔ ∀ i, IsConnected (s i) := by
simp only [IsConnected, ← univ_pi_nonempty_iff, forall_and, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun hne => ⟨fun hc i => ?_, isPreconnected_univ_pi⟩
rw [← eval_image_univ_pi hne]
exact hc.image _ (continuous_apply _).continuousOn
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connectedComponent (x : α) : Set α :=
⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsPreconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
open Classical in
/-- Given a set `F` in a topological space `α` and a point `x : α`, the connected
component of `x` in `F` is the connected component of `x` in the subtype `F` seen as
a set in `α`. This definition does not make sense if `x` is not in `F` so we return the
empty set in this case. -/
def connectedComponentIn (F : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
if h : x ∈ F then (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) else ∅
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_image {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) :=
dif_pos h
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_empty {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = ∅ :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_connectedComponent {x : α} : x ∈ connectedComponent x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨isPreconnected_singleton, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem mem_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hx : x ∈ F) :
x ∈ connectedComponentIn F x := by
simp [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, mem_connectedComponent, hx]
theorem connectedComponent_nonempty {x : α} : (connectedComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
(connectedComponentIn F x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp [connectedComponent_nonempty, *]
theorem connectedComponentIn_subset (F : Set α) (x : α) : connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsPreconnected (connectedComponent x) :=
isPreconnected_sUnion x _ (fun _ => And.right) fun _ => And.left
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsPreconnected (connectedComponentIn F x) := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]; split_ifs
· exact IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mpr isPreconnected_connectedComponent
· exact isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsConnected (connectedComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩, isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
theorem isConnected_connectedComponentIn_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsConnected (connectedComponentIn F x) ↔ x ∈ F := by
simp_rw [← connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff, IsConnected, isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn,
and_true]
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsPreconnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x := fun _z hz => mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ connectedComponentIn F x := by
have : IsPreconnected (((↑) : F → α) ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mp ?_
rwa [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
have h2xs : (⟨x, hsF hxs⟩ : F) ∈ (↑) ⁻¹' s := by
rw [mem_preimage]
exact hxs
have := this.subset_connectedComponent h2xs
rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image (hsF hxs)]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset _ this)
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
theorem IsConnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsConnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
H1.2.subset_connectedComponent H2
theorem IsPreconnected.connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected F)
(hx : x ∈ F) : connectedComponentIn F x = F :=
(connectedComponentIn_subset F x).antisymm (h.subset_connectedComponentIn hx subset_rfl)
theorem connectedComponent_eq {x y : α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponent x) :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent
(Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset mem_connectedComponent
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)))
theorem connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem {x y : α} :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y ↔ x ∈ connectedComponent y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_connectedComponent, fun h => (connectedComponent_eq h).symm⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq {x y : α} {F : Set α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponentIn F x) :
connectedComponentIn F x = connectedComponentIn F y := by
have hx : x ∈ F := connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff.mp ⟨y, h⟩
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, h2y, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hy, connectedComponent_eq h2y]
theorem connectedComponentIn_univ (x : α) : connectedComponentIn univ x = connectedComponent x :=
subset_antisymm
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.subset_connectedComponent <|
mem_connectedComponentIn trivial)
(isPreconnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponentIn mem_connectedComponent <|
subset_univ _)
theorem connectedComponent_disjoint {x y : α} (h : connectedComponent x ≠ connectedComponent y) :
Disjoint (connectedComponent x) (connectedComponent y) :=
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 =>
h ((connectedComponent_eq h1).trans (connectedComponent_eq h2).symm)
theorem isClosed_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsClosed (connectedComponent x) :=
closure_subset_iff_isClosed.1 <|
isConnected_connectedComponent.closure.subset_connectedComponent <|
subset_closure mem_connectedComponent
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) (a : α) : f '' connectedComponent a ⊆ connectedComponent (f a) :=
(isConnected_connectedComponent.image f h.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponent
((mem_image f (connectedComponent a) (f a)).2 ⟨a, mem_connectedComponent, rfl⟩)
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponentIn_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
{a : α} (hf : Continuous f) (hx : a ∈ s) :
f '' connectedComponentIn s a ⊆ connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a) :=
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.image _ hf.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponentIn
(mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_connectedComponentIn hx)
(image_subset _ <| connectedComponentIn_subset _ _)
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponent [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f)
(a : α) : MapsTo f (connectedComponent a) (connectedComponent (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| h.image_connectedComponent_subset a
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponentIn [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : Continuous f) {a : α} (hx : a ∈ s) :
MapsTo f (connectedComponentIn s a) (connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| image_connectedComponentIn_subset h hx
theorem irreducibleComponent_subset_connectedComponent {x : α} :
irreducibleComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent.isConnected.subset_connectedComponent mem_irreducibleComponent
@[mono]
theorem connectedComponentIn_mono (x : α) {F G : Set α} (h : F ⊆ G) :
connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ connectedComponentIn G x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ F
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, connectedComponentIn_eq_image (h hx), ←
show ((↑) : G → α) ∘ inclusion h = (↑) from rfl, image_comp]
exact image_subset _ ((continuous_inclusion h).image_connectedComponent_subset ⟨x, hx⟩)
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_empty hx]
exact Set.empty_subset _
/-- A preconnected space is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class PreconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The universal set `Set.univ` in a preconnected space is a preconnected set. -/
isPreconnected_univ : IsPreconnected (univ : Set α)
export PreconnectedSpace (isPreconnected_univ)
/-- A connected space is a nonempty one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class ConnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop extends PreconnectedSpace α where
/-- A connected space is nonempty. -/
toNonempty : Nonempty α
attribute [instance 50] ConnectedSpace.toNonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
theorem isConnected_univ [ConnectedSpace α] : IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨univ_nonempty, isPreconnected_univ⟩
lemma preconnectedSpace_iff_univ : PreconnectedSpace α ↔ IsPreconnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma connectedSpace_iff_univ : ConnectedSpace α ↔ IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨univ_nonempty, h.1.1⟩,
fun h ↦ ConnectedSpace.mk (toPreconnectedSpace := ⟨h.2⟩) ⟨h.1.some⟩⟩
theorem isPreconnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) : IsPreconnected (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ isPreconnected_univ.image _ h.continuousOn
theorem isConnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f) :
IsConnected (range f) :=
⟨range_nonempty f, isPreconnected_range h⟩
theorem Function.Surjective.connectedSpace [ConnectedSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : ConnectedSpace β := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instConnectedSpace {s : Setoid α} [ConnectedSpace α] :
ConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.connectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem DenseRange.preconnectedSpace [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(hf : DenseRange f) (hc : Continuous f) : PreconnectedSpace β :=
⟨hf.closure_eq ▸ (isPreconnected_range hc).closure⟩
theorem connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
ConnectedSpace α ↔ ∃ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
exact
⟨x, eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, h⟩
haveI : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨by rw [← h]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
exact ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
theorem preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
PreconnectedSpace α ↔ ∀ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· intro h x
exact eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)
· intro h
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· exact ⟨by rw [univ_eq_empty_iff.mpr hα]; exact isPreconnected_empty⟩
· exact ⟨by rw [← h (Classical.choice hα)]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
@[simp]
theorem PreconnectedSpace.connectedComponent_eq_univ {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[h : PreconnectedSpace X] (x : X) : connectedComponent x = univ :=
preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent.mp h x
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] [PreconnectedSpace β] :
PreconnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨by
rw [← univ_prod_univ]
exact isPreconnected_univ.prod isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] [ConnectedSpace β] : ConnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, PreconnectedSpace (π i)] :
PreconnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨by rw [← pi_univ univ]; exact isPreconnected_univ_pi fun i => isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, ConnectedSpace (π i)] : ConnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PreirreducibleSpace.preconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[PreirreducibleSpace α] : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨isPreirreducible_univ.isPreconnected⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IrreducibleSpace.connectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[IrreducibleSpace α] : ConnectedSpace α where toNonempty := IrreducibleSpace.toNonempty
theorem Subtype.preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : PreconnectedSpace s where
isPreconnected_univ := by
rwa [← IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image, image_univ, Subtype.range_val]
theorem Subtype.connectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : ConnectedSpace s where
toPreconnectedSpace := Subtype.preconnectedSpace h.isPreconnected
toNonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype
theorem isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ PreconnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.preconnectedSpace, fun h => by
simpa using isPreconnected_univ.image ((↑) : s → α) continuous_subtype_val.continuousOn⟩
theorem isConnected_iff_connectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsConnected s ↔ ConnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.connectedSpace, fun h =>
⟨nonempty_subtype.mp h.2, isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace.mpr h.1⟩⟩
end Preconnected
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 783 | 786 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Basic facts about biproducts in preadditive categories.
In (or between) preadditive categories,
* Any biproduct satisfies the equality
`total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`,
or, in the binary case, `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`.
* Any (binary) `product` or (binary) `coproduct` is a (binary) `biproduct`.
* In any category (with zero morphisms), if `biprod.map f g` is an isomorphism,
then both `f` and `g` are isomorphisms.
* If `f` is a morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
then we can construct isomorphisms `L : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂` and `R : Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂`
so that `L.hom ≫ g ≫ R.hom` is diagonal (with `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` component still `f`),
via Gaussian elimination.
* As a corollary of the previous two facts,
if we have an isomorphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
we can construct an isomorphism `X₂ ≅ Y₂`.
* If `f : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z` is an isomorphism, either `𝟙 W = 0`,
or at least one of the component maps `W ⟶ Y` and `W ⟶ Z` is nonzero.
* If `f : ⨁ S ⟶ ⨁ T` is an isomorphism,
then every column (corresponding to a nonzero summand in the domain)
has some nonzero matrix entry.
* A functor preserves a biproduct if and only if it preserves
the corresponding product if and only if it preserves the corresponding coproduct.
There are connections between this material and the special case of the category whose morphisms are
matrices over a ring, in particular the Schur complement (see
`Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SchurComplement`). In particular, the declarations
`CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`, `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian`
and `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` are all closely related.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
namespace Limits
section Fintype
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBilimitOfTotal {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) :
b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => ∑ j : J, s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ b.ι j
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
have reassoced : m ≫ Bicone.π b j ≫ Bicone.ι b j = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ Bicone.ι b j := by
erw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
rw [reassoced]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [sum_comp, Category.assoc, Bicone.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp
simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app ⟨j⟩
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, sum_comp]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
erw [Category.assoc, h ⟨j⟩]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp]
dsimp; simp }
theorem IsBilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : Bicone f} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBiproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f)
(total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBiproduct f :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsLimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsLimit t) : (Bicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsLimit _ <| IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ht <| Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsColimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp_rw [Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp]
simp
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (Bicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsColimit _ <| IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro ⟨j⟩; simp
end Fintype
section Finite
variable {J : Type} [Finite J]
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
end Finite
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct _ }⟩
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts [HasFiniteCoproducts C] :
HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct _ }⟩
section HasBiproduct
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f]
/-- In any preadditive category, any biproduct satisfies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
IsBilimit.total (biproduct.isBilimit _)
theorem biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j := by
classical
ext j
simp only [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, if_true]
theorem biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j := by
classical
ext j
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j := by
classical
simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite,
dite_comp]
theorem biproduct.map_eq [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_matrix {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
{P} (x : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.lift_desc]
end HasBiproduct
section HasFiniteBiproducts
variable {J K : Type} [Finite J] {f : J → C} [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_desc [Fintype K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
(m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : ∀ k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc fun j => ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k := by
ext
simp [lift_desc]
variable [Finite K]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_map {f : J → C} {g : K → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ k, g k ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.map n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j k ≫ n k := by
ext
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.map_matrix {f : J → C} {g : J → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ k, f k ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ j k, g j ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.map m ≫ biproduct.matrix n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j ≫ n j k := by
ext
simp
end HasFiniteBiproducts
/-- Reindex a categorical biproduct via an equivalence of the index types. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.reindex {β γ : Type} [Finite β] (ε : β ≃ γ)
(f : γ → C) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (f ∘ ε)] : ⨁ f ∘ ε ≅ ⨁ f where
hom := biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.ι f (ε b)
inv := biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.π f (ε b)
hom_inv_id := by
ext b b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· subst h; simp
· have : ε b' ≠ ε b := by simp [h]
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h, biproduct.ι_π_ne _ this]
inv_hom_id := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
ext g g'
by_cases h : g' = g <;>
simp [Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.lift_desc,
biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply,
Finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.univ (ε.symm g') _, h]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBinaryBilimitOfTotal {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s =>
(BinaryFan.fst s ≫ b.inl : s.pt ⟶ b.pt) + (BinaryFan.snd s ≫ b.inr : s.pt ⟶ b.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
have reassoced (j : WalkingPair) {W : C} (h' : _ ⟶ W) :
m ≫ b.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_add, reassoced WalkingPair.left,
reassoced WalkingPair.right]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s =>
(b.fst ≫ BinaryCofan.inl s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt) + (b.snd ≫ BinaryCofan.inr s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, add_comp, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩, h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
theorem IsBilimit.binary_total {X Y : C} {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBinaryBiproduct_of_total {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBinaryBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
snd := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
inl := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
inr := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
theorem inl_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inl = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
theorem inr_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inr = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ (by refine BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp)
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
(BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (by simp) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary products exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryProducts [HasBinaryProducts C] : HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct X Y }
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone {X Y : C} {t : Cocone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
snd := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
inl := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
inr := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
theorem fst_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.fst = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
theorem snd_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.snd = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a
bilimit bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| by
refine BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {X Y : C} {t : Cocone (pair X Y)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit (BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone ht) <|
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <|
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary coproducts exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryCoproducts [HasBinaryCoproducts C] :
HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryCoproduct X Y }
section
variable {X Y : C} [HasBinaryBiproduct X Y]
/-- In any preadditive category, any binary biproduct satisfies
`biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem biprod.total : biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y) := by
ext <;> simp [add_comp]
theorem biprod.lift_eq {T : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} :
biprod.lift f g = f ≫ biprod.inl + g ≫ biprod.inr := by ext <;> simp [add_comp]
theorem biprod.desc_eq {T : C} {f : X ⟶ T} {g : Y ⟶ T} :
biprod.desc f g = biprod.fst ≫ f + biprod.snd ≫ g := by ext <;> simp [add_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biprod.lift_desc {T U : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} {h : X ⟶ U} {i : Y ⟶ U} :
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc h i = f ≫ h + g ≫ i := by simp [biprod.lift_eq, biprod.desc_eq]
theorem biprod.map_eq [HasBinaryBiproducts C] {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} :
biprod.map f g = biprod.fst ≫ f ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ g ≫ biprod.inr := by
ext <;> simp
section
variable {Z : C}
lemma biprod.decomp_hom_to (f : Z ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :
∃ f₁ f₂, f = f₁ ≫ biprod.inl + f₂ ≫ biprod.inr :=
⟨f ≫ biprod.fst, f ≫ biprod.snd, by aesop⟩
lemma biprod.ext_to_iff {f g : Z ⟶ X ⊞ Y} :
f = g ↔ f ≫ biprod.fst = g ≫ biprod.fst ∧ f ≫ biprod.snd = g ≫ biprod.snd := by
aesop
lemma biprod.decomp_hom_from (f : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Z) :
∃ f₁ f₂, f = biprod.fst ≫ f₁ + biprod.snd ≫ f₂ :=
⟨biprod.inl ≫ f, biprod.inr ≫ f, by aesop⟩
lemma biprod.ext_from_iff {f g : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Z} :
f = g ↔ biprod.inl ≫ f = biprod.inl ≫ g ∧ biprod.inr ≫ f = biprod.inr ≫ g := by
aesop
end
/-- Every split mono `f` with a cokernel induces a binary bicone with `f` as its `inl` and
the cokernel map as its `snd`.
We will show in `is_bilimit_binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel` that this binary bicone is in
fact already a biproduct. -/
@[simps]
def binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsSplitMono f] {c : CokernelCofork f}
(i : IsColimit c) : BinaryBicone X c.pt where
pt := Y
fst := retraction f
snd := c.π
inl := f
inr :=
let c' : CokernelCofork (𝟙 Y - (𝟙 Y - retraction f ≫ f)) :=
CokernelCofork.ofπ (Cofork.π c) (by simp)
let i' : IsColimit c' := isCokernelEpiComp i (retraction f) (by simp)
let i'' := isColimitCoforkOfCokernelCofork i'
(splitEpiOfIdempotentOfIsColimitCofork C (by simp) i'').section_
inl_fst := by simp
inl_snd := by simp
inr_fst := by
dsimp only
rw [splitEpiOfIdempotentOfIsColimitCofork_section_,
isColimitCoforkOfCokernelCofork_desc, isCokernelEpiComp_desc]
dsimp only [cokernelCoforkOfCofork_ofπ]
letI := epi_of_isColimit_cofork i
apply zero_of_epi_comp c.π
simp only [sub_comp, comp_sub, Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, IsSplitMono.id, sub_self,
Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc_assoc, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, IsSplitMono.id_assoc]
apply sub_eq_zero_of_eq
apply Category.id_comp
inr_snd := by apply SplitEpi.id
/-- The bicone constructed in `binaryBiconeOfSplitMonoOfCokernel` is a bilimit.
This is a version of the splitting lemma that holds in all preadditive categories. -/
def isBilimitBinaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsSplitMono f]
{c : CokernelCofork f} (i : IsColimit c) : (binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel i).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _
(by
simp only [binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel_fst,
binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel_inr,
binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel_snd,
splitEpiOfIdempotentOfIsColimitCofork_section_]
dsimp only [binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel_pt]
rw [isColimitCoforkOfCokernelCofork_desc, isCokernelEpiComp_desc]
simp only [binaryBiconeOfIsSplitMonoOfCokernel_inl, Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc,
cokernelCoforkOfCofork_π, Cofork.π_ofπ, add_sub_cancel])
/-- If `b` is a binary bicone such that `b.inl` is a kernel of `b.snd`, then `b` is a bilimit
bicone. -/
def BinaryBicone.isBilimitOfKernelInl {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(hb : IsLimit b.sndKernelFork) : b.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit _ <|
BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f g => f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr) (fun f g => by simp)
(fun f g => by simp) fun {T} f g m h₁ h₂ => by
dsimp at m
have h₁' : ((m : T ⟶ b.pt) - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)) ≫ b.fst = 0 := by
simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₁
have h₂' : (m - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)) ≫ b.snd = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₂
obtain ⟨q : T ⟶ X, hq : q ≫ b.inl = m - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)⟩ :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hb _ h₂'
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hq, ← Category.comp_id q, ← b.inl_fst, ← Category.assoc, hq, h₁',
zero_comp]
/-- If `b` is a binary bicone such that `b.inr` is a kernel of `b.fst`, then `b` is a bilimit
bicone. -/
def BinaryBicone.isBilimitOfKernelInr {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(hb : IsLimit b.fstKernelFork) : b.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit _ <|
BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f g => f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr) (fun f g => by simp)
(fun f g => by simp) fun {T} f g m h₁ h₂ => by
dsimp at m
have h₁' : (m - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)) ≫ b.fst = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₁
have h₂' : (m - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)) ≫ b.snd = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₂
obtain ⟨q : T ⟶ Y, hq : q ≫ b.inr = m - (f ≫ b.inl + g ≫ b.inr)⟩ :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hb _ h₁'
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hq, ← Category.comp_id q, ← b.inr_snd, ← Category.assoc, hq, h₂',
zero_comp]
/-- If `b` is a binary bicone such that `b.fst` is a cokernel of `b.inr`, then `b` is a bilimit
bicone. -/
def BinaryBicone.isBilimitOfCokernelFst {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(hb : IsColimit b.inrCokernelCofork) : b.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit _ <|
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f g => b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g) (fun f g => by simp)
(fun f g => by simp) fun {T} f g m h₁ h₂ => by
dsimp at m
have h₁' : b.inl ≫ (m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)) = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₁
have h₂' : b.inr ≫ (m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)) = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₂
obtain ⟨q : X ⟶ T, hq : b.fst ≫ q = m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hb _ h₂'
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hq, ← Category.id_comp q, ← b.inl_fst, Category.assoc, hq, h₁',
comp_zero]
/-- If `b` is a binary bicone such that `b.snd` is a cokernel of `b.inl`, then `b` is a bilimit
bicone. -/
def BinaryBicone.isBilimitOfCokernelSnd {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(hb : IsColimit b.inlCokernelCofork) : b.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfIsColimit _ <|
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f g => b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g) (fun f g => by simp)
(fun f g => by simp) fun {T} f g m h₁ h₂ => by
dsimp at m
have h₁' : b.inl ≫ (m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)) = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₁
have h₂' : b.inr ≫ (m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)) = 0 := by simpa using sub_eq_zero.2 h₂
obtain ⟨q : Y ⟶ T, hq : b.snd ≫ q = m - (b.fst ≫ f + b.snd ≫ g)⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hb _ h₁'
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hq, ← Category.id_comp q, ← b.inr_snd, Category.assoc, hq, h₂',
comp_zero]
/-- Every split epi `f` with a kernel induces a binary bicone with `f` as its `snd` and
the kernel map as its `inl`.
We will show in `binary_bicone_of_is_split_mono_of_cokernel` that this binary bicone is in fact
already a biproduct. -/
@[simps]
def binaryBiconeOfIsSplitEpiOfKernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsSplitEpi f] {c : KernelFork f}
(i : IsLimit c) : BinaryBicone c.pt Y :=
{ pt := X
fst :=
let c' : KernelFork (𝟙 X - (𝟙 X - f ≫ section_ f)) := KernelFork.ofι (Fork.ι c) (by simp)
let i' : IsLimit c' := isKernelCompMono i (section_ f) (by simp)
let i'' := isLimitForkOfKernelFork i'
(splitMonoOfIdempotentOfIsLimitFork C (by simp) i'').retraction
snd := f
inl := c.ι
inr := section_ f
inl_fst := by apply SplitMono.id
inl_snd := by simp
inr_fst := by
dsimp only
rw [splitMonoOfIdempotentOfIsLimitFork_retraction, isLimitForkOfKernelFork_lift,
isKernelCompMono_lift]
dsimp only [kernelForkOfFork_ι]
letI := mono_of_isLimit_fork i
apply zero_of_comp_mono c.ι
simp only [comp_sub, Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, sub_self, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι,
Fork.ι_ofι, IsSplitEpi.id_assoc]
inr_snd := by simp }
/-- The bicone constructed in `binaryBiconeOfIsSplitEpiOfKernel` is a bilimit.
This is a version of the splitting lemma that holds in all preadditive categories. -/
def isBilimitBinaryBiconeOfIsSplitEpiOfKernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsSplitEpi f]
{c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) : (binaryBiconeOfIsSplitEpiOfKernel i).IsBilimit :=
BinaryBicone.isBilimitOfKernelInl _ <| i.ofIsoLimit <| Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
end
section
variable {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
theorem biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc [HasBinaryBiproduct X X] :
f + g = biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ biprod.desc f g := by simp
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
theorem biprod.add_eq_lift_desc_id [HasBinaryBiproduct Y Y] :
f + g = biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) := by simp
end
end Limits
open CategoryTheory.Limits
section
attribute [local ext] Preadditive
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
instance subsingleton_preadditive_of_hasBinaryBiproducts {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C] : Subsingleton (Preadditive C) where
allEq := fun a b => by
apply Preadditive.ext; funext X Y; apply AddCommGroup.ext; funext f g
have h₁ := @biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc _ _ a _ _ f g
(by convert (inferInstance : HasBinaryBiproduct X X); subsingleton)
have h₂ := @biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc _ _ b _ _ f g
(by convert (inferInstance : HasBinaryBiproduct X X); subsingleton)
refine h₁.trans (Eq.trans ?_ h₂.symm)
congr! 2 <;> subsingleton
end
section
variable [HasBinaryBiproducts.{v} C]
variable {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : C}
variable (f₁₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₁₂ : X₁ ⟶ Y₂) (f₂₁ : X₂ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂)
/-- The "matrix" morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` with specified components.
-/
def Biprod.ofComponents : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ :=
biprod.fst ≫ f₁₁ ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.fst ≫ f₁₂ ≫ biprod.inr + biprod.snd ≫ f₂₁ ≫ biprod.inl +
biprod.snd ≫ f₂₂ ≫ biprod.inr
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.inl_ofComponents :
biprod.inl ≫ Biprod.ofComponents f₁₁ f₁₂ f₂₁ f₂₂ = f₁₁ ≫ biprod.inl + f₁₂ ≫ biprod.inr := by
simp [Biprod.ofComponents]
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.inr_ofComponents :
biprod.inr ≫ Biprod.ofComponents f₁₁ f₁₂ f₂₁ f₂₂ = f₂₁ ≫ biprod.inl + f₂₂ ≫ biprod.inr := by
simp [Biprod.ofComponents]
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.ofComponents_fst :
Biprod.ofComponents f₁₁ f₁₂ f₂₁ f₂₂ ≫ biprod.fst = biprod.fst ≫ f₁₁ + biprod.snd ≫ f₂₁ := by
simp [Biprod.ofComponents]
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.ofComponents_snd :
Biprod.ofComponents f₁₁ f₁₂ f₂₁ f₂₂ ≫ biprod.snd = biprod.fst ≫ f₁₂ + biprod.snd ≫ f₂₂ := by
simp [Biprod.ofComponents]
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.ofComponents_eq (f : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂) :
Biprod.ofComponents (biprod.inl ≫ f ≫ biprod.fst) (biprod.inl ≫ f ≫ biprod.snd)
(biprod.inr ≫ f ≫ biprod.fst) (biprod.inr ≫ f ≫ biprod.snd) =
f := by
ext <;>
simp only [Category.comp_id, biprod.inr_fst, biprod.inr_snd, biprod.inl_snd, add_zero, zero_add,
Biprod.inl_ofComponents, Biprod.inr_ofComponents, eq_self_iff_true, Category.assoc,
comp_zero, biprod.inl_fst, Preadditive.add_comp]
@[simp]
theorem Biprod.ofComponents_comp {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂ : C} (f₁₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₁₂ : X₁ ⟶ Y₂)
(f₂₁ : X₂ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₁₂ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₂) (g₂₁ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₁)
(g₂₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂) :
Biprod.ofComponents f₁₁ f₁₂ f₂₁ f₂₂ ≫ Biprod.ofComponents g₁₁ g₁₂ g₂₁ g₂₂ =
Biprod.ofComponents (f₁₁ ≫ g₁₁ + f₁₂ ≫ g₂₁) (f₁₁ ≫ g₁₂ + f₁₂ ≫ g₂₂) (f₂₁ ≫ g₁₁ + f₂₂ ≫ g₂₁)
(f₂₁ ≫ g₁₂ + f₂₂ ≫ g₂₂) := by
dsimp [Biprod.ofComponents]
ext <;>
simp only [add_comp, comp_add, add_comp_assoc, add_zero, zero_add, biprod.inl_fst,
biprod.inl_snd, biprod.inr_fst, biprod.inr_snd, biprod.inl_fst_assoc, biprod.inl_snd_assoc,
biprod.inr_fst_assoc, biprod.inr_snd_assoc, comp_zero, zero_comp, Category.assoc]
/-- The unipotent upper triangular matrix
```
(1 r)
(0 1)
```
as an isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def Biprod.unipotentUpper {X₁ X₂ : C} (r : X₁ ⟶ X₂) : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂ where
hom := Biprod.ofComponents (𝟙 _) r 0 (𝟙 _)
inv := Biprod.ofComponents (𝟙 _) (-r) 0 (𝟙 _)
/-- The unipotent lower triangular matrix
```
| (1 0)
(r 1)
```
as an isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def Biprod.unipotentLower {X₁ X₂ : C} (r : X₂ ⟶ X₁) : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂ where
hom := Biprod.ofComponents (𝟙 _) 0 r (𝟙 _)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Biproducts.lean | 719 | 726 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.WalkCounting
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
/-!
# Adjacency Matrices
This module defines the adjacency matrix of a graph, and provides theorems connecting graph
properties to computational properties of the matrix.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix`: `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`.
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.to_graph`: for `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : A.IsAdjMatrix`,
`h.to_graph` is the simple graph induced by `A`.
* `Matrix.compl`: for `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be
the adjacency matrix of the complement graph of the graph induced by `A`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix`: the adjacency matrix of a `SimpleGraph`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk`: each entry of the `n`th power of
a graph's adjacency matrix counts the number of length-`n` walks between the corresponding
pair of vertices.
-/
open Matrix
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph
variable {V α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`. -/
structure IsAdjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] (A : Matrix V V α) : Prop where
zero_or_one : ∀ i j, A i j = 0 ∨ A i j = 1 := by aesop
symm : A.IsSymm := by aesop
apply_diag : ∀ i, A i i = 0 := by aesop
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A : Matrix V V α}
@[simp]
theorem apply_diag_ne [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i : V) :
¬A i i = 1 := by simp [h.apply_diag i]
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_one_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 1 ↔ A i j = 0 := by obtain h | h := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_zero_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 0 ↔ A i j = 1 := by rw [← apply_ne_one_iff h, Classical.not_not]
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : IsAdjMatrix A`,
`h.toGraph` is the simple graph whose adjacency matrix is `A`. -/
@[simps]
def toGraph [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj i j := A i j = 1
symm i j hij := by simp only; rwa [h.symm.apply i j]
loopless i := by simp [h]
instance [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
DecidableRel h.toGraph.Adj := by
simp only [toGraph]
infer_instance
end IsAdjMatrix
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be the adjacency matrix of
the complement graph of the graph induced by `A.adjMatrix`. -/
def compl [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α) : Matrix V V α :=
fun i j => ite (i = j) 0 (ite (A i j = 0) 1 0)
section Compl
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α)
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply_diag [Zero α] [One α] (i : V) : A.compl i i = 0 := by simp [compl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply [Zero α] [One α] (i j : V) : A.compl i j = 0 ∨ A.compl i j = 1 := by
unfold compl
split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : A.compl.IsSymm := by
ext
simp [compl, h.apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
{ symm := by simp [h] }
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
isAdjMatrix_compl A h.symm
theorem toGraph_compl_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
h.compl.toGraph = h.toGraphᶜ := by
ext v w
rcases h.zero_or_one v w with h | h <;> by_cases hvw : v = w <;> simp [Matrix.compl, h, hvw]
end IsAdjMatrix
end Compl
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
variable (α) in
/-- `adjMatrix G α` is the matrix `A` such that `A i j = (1 : α)` if `i` and `j` are
adjacent in the simple graph `G`, and otherwise `A i j = 0`. -/
def adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : Matrix V V α :=
of fun i j => if G.Adj i j then (1 : α) else 0
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `adjMatrix`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_apply (v w : V) [Zero α] [One α] :
G.adjMatrix α v w = if G.Adj v w then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transpose_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α)ᵀ = G.adjMatrix α := by
ext
simp [adj_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsSymm :=
transpose_adjMatrix G
variable (α)
/-- The adjacency matrix of `G` is an adjacency matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsAdjMatrix :=
{ zero_or_one := fun i j => by by_cases h : G.Adj i j <;> simp [h] }
/-- The graph induced by the adjacency matrix of `G` is `G` itself. -/
theorem toGraph_adjMatrix_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] :
(G.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix α).toGraph = G := by
ext
simp only [IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_adj, adjMatrix_apply, ite_eq_left_iff, zero_ne_one]
apply Classical.not_not
variable {α}
/-- The sum of the identity, the adjacency matrix, and its complement is the all-ones matrix. -/
theorem one_add_adjMatrix_add_compl_adjMatrix_eq_allOnes [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq α]
[AddMonoidWithOne α] : 1 + G.adjMatrix α + (G.adjMatrix α).compl = Matrix.of fun _ _ ↦ 1 := by
ext i j
unfold Matrix.compl
rw [of_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, one_apply]
by_cases h : G.Adj i j
· aesop
· split_ifs <;> simp_all
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_dotProduct [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct (G.adjMatrix α v) vec = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_adjMatrix [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct vec (G.adjMatrix α v) = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter, Finset.sum_apply]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ vec) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
rw [mulVec, adjMatrix_dotProduct]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_vecMul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
| (vec ᵥ* G.adjMatrix α) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp only [← dotProduct_adjMatrix, vecMul]
refine congr rfl ?_; ext x
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/AdjMatrix.lean | 204 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
/-!
# The strong law of large numbers
We prove the strong law of large numbers, in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`:
If `X n` is a sequence of independent identically distributed integrable random
variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`.
We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence.
This file also contains the Lᵖ version of the strong law of large numbers provided by
`ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_Lp` which shows `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges in Lᵖ to
`𝔼[X 0]` provided `X n` is independent identically distributed and is Lᵖ.
## Implementation
The main point is to prove the result for real-valued random variables, as the general case
of Banach-space valued random variables follows from this case and approximation by simple
functions. The real version is given in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae_real`.
We follow the proof by Etemadi
[Etemadi, *An elementary proof of the strong law of large numbers*][etemadi_strong_law],
which goes as follows.
It suffices to prove the result for nonnegative `X`, as one can prove the general result by
splitting a general `X` into its positive part and negative part.
Consider `Xₙ` a sequence of nonnegative integrable identically distributed pairwise independent
random variables. Let `Yₙ` be the truncation of `Xₙ` up to `n`. We claim that
* Almost surely, `Xₙ = Yₙ` for all but finitely many indices. Indeed, `∑ ℙ (Xₙ ≠ Yₙ)` is bounded by
`1 + 𝔼[X]` (see `sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le` and `tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top`).
* Let `c > 1`. Along the sequence `n = c ^ k`, then `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ])/n` converges almost
surely to `0`. This follows from a variance control, as
```
∑_k ℙ (|∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ]| > c^k ε)
≤ ∑_k (c^k ε)^{-2} ∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Var[Yᵢ] (by Markov inequality)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) Var[Yᵢ] (as ∑_{c^k > i} 1/(c^k)^2 ≤ C/i^2)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) 𝔼[Yᵢ^2]
≤ 2C 𝔼[X^2] (see `sum_variance_truncation_le`)
```
* As `𝔼[Yᵢ]` converges to `𝔼[X]`, it follows from the two previous items and Cesàro that, along
the sequence `n = c^k`, one has `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ) / n → 𝔼[X]` almost surely.
* To generalize it to all indices, we use the fact that `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ` is nondecreasing and
that, if `c` is close enough to `1`, the gap between `c^k` and `c^(k+1)` is small.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-! ### Prerequisites on truncations -/
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Truncating a real-valued function to the interval `(-A, A]`. -/
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem abs_truncation_le_bound (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |A| := by
simp only [truncation, Set.indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_le_abs h.2 (neg_le.2 h.1.le)
· simp [abs_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem truncation_zero (f : α → ℝ) : truncation f 0 = 0 := by simp [truncation]; rfl
theorem abs_truncation_le_abs_self (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |f x| := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· simp [abs_nonneg]
theorem truncation_eq_self {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} {x : α} (h : |f x| < A) :
truncation f A x = f x := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro H
apply H.elim
simp [(abs_lt.1 h).1, (abs_lt.1 h).2.le]
theorem truncation_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
truncation f A = indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id ∘ f := by
ext x
rcases (h x).lt_or_eq with (hx | hx)
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply]
| by_cases h'x : f x ≤ A
· have : -A < f x := by linarith [h x]
simp only [this, true_and]
· simp only [h'x, and_false]
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_self]
theorem truncation_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (A : ℝ) {x : α} (h : 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ truncation f A x :=
Set.indicator_apply_nonneg fun _ => h
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.memLp_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 114 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (ofNat(n) : PartENat) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hy
· simp
induction x using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hx
· simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_lt {x y : PartENat} [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x < toWithTop y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toWithTop_le
end WithTop
/-- Coercion from `ℕ∞` to `PartENat`. -/
@[coe]
def ofENat : ℕ∞ → PartENat :=
fun x => match x with
| Option.none => none
| Option.some n => some n
instance : Coe ℕ∞ PartENat := ⟨ofENat⟩
example (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℕ∞) : PartENat) = ↑n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_coe (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofENat ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toWithTop_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop (↑n) = n := by
cases n with
| top => simp
| coe n => simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_toWithTop (x : PartENat) {_ : Decidable (x : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop x = x := by
induction x using PartENat.casesOn <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_le {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x ≤ ofENat y ↔ x ≤ y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_le, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x < ofENat y ↔ x < y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_lt, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
section WithTopEquiv
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_add {x y : PartENat} : toWithTop (x + y) = toWithTop x + toWithTop y := by
refine PartENat.casesOn y ?_ ?_ <;> refine PartENat.casesOn x ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [add_top, top_add, ← Nat.cast_add, ← ENat.coe_add]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `Equiv` between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`withTopOrderIso`). -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def withTopEquiv : PartENat ≃ ℕ∞ where
toFun x := toWithTop x
invFun x := ↑x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
theorem withTopEquiv_top : withTopEquiv ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_natCast (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_zero : withTopEquiv 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_one : withTopEquiv 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_le {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x ≤ withTopEquiv y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_lt {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x < withTopEquiv y ↔ x < y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_top : withTopEquiv.symm ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_coe (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv.symm n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_zero : withTopEquiv.symm 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_one : withTopEquiv.symm 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv.symm ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_le {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x ≤ withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x < withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x < y := by
simp
/-- `toWithTop` induces an order isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => withTopEquiv_le }
/-- `toWithTop` induces an additive monoid isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [withTopEquiv]
exact toWithTop_add }
end WithTopEquiv
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded PartENat (· < ·) := by
classical
change WellFounded fun a b : PartENat => a < b
simp_rw [← withTopEquiv_lt]
exact InvImage.wf _ wellFounded_lt
instance : WellFoundedLT PartENat :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation PartENat :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
section Find
variable (P : ℕ → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
/-- The smallest `PartENat` satisfying a (decidable) predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` -/
def find : PartENat :=
⟨∃ n, P n, Nat.find⟩
@[simp]
theorem find_get (h : (find P).Dom) : (find P).get h = Nat.find h :=
rfl
theorem find_dom (h : ∃ n, P n) : (find P).Dom :=
h
theorem lt_find (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m) : (n : PartENat) < find P := by
rw [coe_lt_iff]
intro h₁
rw [find_get]
have h₂ := @Nat.find_spec P _ h₁
revert h₂
contrapose!
exact h _
theorem lt_find_iff (n : ℕ) : (n : PartENat) < find P ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m := by
refine ⟨?_, lt_find P n⟩
intro h m hm
by_cases H : (find P).Dom
· apply Nat.find_min H
rw [coe_lt_iff] at h
specialize h H
exact lt_of_le_of_lt hm h
· exact not_exists.mp H m
theorem find_le (n : ℕ) (h : P n) : find P ≤ n := by
rw [le_coe_iff]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, @Nat.find_min' P _ _ _ h⟩
theorem find_eq_top_iff : find P = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ¬P n :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt _).trans
⟨fun h n => (lt_find_iff P n).mp (h n) _ le_rfl, fun h n => lt_find P n fun _ _ => h _⟩
end Find
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop PartENat :=
{ PartENat.linearOrder, PartENat.isOrderedAddMonoid, PartENat.orderTop with
top_add' := top_add }
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder PartENat :=
{ lattice, withTopOrderIso.symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice,
linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end PartENat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 872 | 874 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
| dsimp only [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem
unfold erase
revert h_mem; cases cmpLE x t_x <;> intro h_mem <;> dsimp only at h_mem ⊢
· have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 616 | 619 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Unique
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
/-! # Conditional expectation in L2
This file contains one step of the construction of the conditional expectation, which is completed
in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic`. See that file for a description of the
full process.
We build the conditional expectation of an `L²` function, as an element of `L²`. This is the
orthogonal projection on the subspace of almost everywhere `m`-measurable functions.
## Main definitions
* `condExpL2`: Conditional expectation of a function in L2 with respect to a sigma-algebra: it is
the orthogonal projection on the subspace `lpMeas`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the results in this file are valid for a complete real normed space `F`.
However, some lemmas also use `𝕜 : RCLike`:
* `condExpL2` is defined only for an `InnerProductSpace` for now, and we use `𝕜` for its field.
* results about scalar multiplication are stated not only for `ℝ` but also for `𝕜` if we happen to
have `NormedSpace 𝕜 F`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E E' F G G' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- E for an inner product space
[NormedAddCommGroup E]
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]
-- E' for an inner product space on which we compute integrals
[NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] [CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- G for a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G]
-- G' for integrals on a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedSpace ℝ G'] [CompleteSpace G']
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫₂" => @inner 𝕜 (α →₂[μ] E) _ x y
variable (E 𝕜)
/-- Conditional expectation of a function in L2 with respect to a sigma-algebra -/
noncomputable def condExpL2 (hm : m ≤ m0) : (α →₂[μ] E) →L[𝕜] lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ :=
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
(lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ).orthogonalProjection
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpL2 := condExpL2
variable {E 𝕜}
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL2 (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) μ :=
lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable'_condExpL2 := aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable'_condexpL2 := aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL2
theorem integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
IntegrableOn (ε := E) (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) s μ :=
integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E) fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim
hμs
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top := integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top
theorem integrable_condExpL2_of_isFiniteMeasure (hm : m ≤ m0) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →₂[μ] E} :
Integrable (ε := E) (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) μ :=
integrableOn_univ.mp <| integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm (measure_ne_top _ _) f
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias integrable_condexpL2_of_isFiniteMeasure := integrable_condExpL2_of_isFiniteMeasure
theorem norm_condExpL2_le_one (hm : m ≤ m0) : ‖@condExpL2 α E 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ _ μ hm‖ ≤ 1 :=
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
Submodule.orthogonalProjection_norm_le _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias norm_condexpL2_le_one := norm_condExpL2_le_one
theorem norm_condExpL2_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) : ‖condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
((@condExpL2 _ E 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ _ μ hm).le_opNorm f).trans
(mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg _) (norm_condExpL2_le_one hm))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias norm_condexpL2_le := norm_condExpL2_le
theorem eLpNorm_condExpL2_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
eLpNorm (ε := E) (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) 2 μ ≤ eLpNorm f 2 μ := by
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (Lp.eLpNorm_ne_top _) (Lp.eLpNorm_ne_top _), ←
Lp.norm_def, ← Lp.norm_def, Submodule.norm_coe]
exact norm_condExpL2_le hm f
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias eLpNorm_condexpL2_le := eLpNorm_condExpL2_le
theorem norm_condExpL2_coe_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
‖(condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, Lp.norm_def]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (Lp.eLpNorm_ne_top _) (eLpNorm_condExpL2_le hm f)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias norm_condexpL2_coe_le := norm_condExpL2_coe_le
theorem inner_condExpL2_left_eq_right (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : α →₂[μ] E} :
⟪(condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E), g⟫₂ = ⟪f, (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm g : α →₂[μ] E)⟫₂ :=
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
Submodule.inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias inner_condexpL2_left_eq_right := inner_condExpL2_left_eq_right
theorem condExpL2_indicator_of_measurable (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(c : E) :
(condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c) : α →₂[μ] E) =
indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c := by
rw [condExpL2]
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
have h_mem : indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c ∈ lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ :=
mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp hm hs hμs
let ind := (⟨indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c, h_mem⟩ : lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ)
have h_coe_ind : (ind : α →₂[μ] E) = indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c := rfl
have h_orth_mem := Submodule.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self ind
rw [← h_coe_ind, h_orth_mem]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpL2_indicator_of_measurable := condExpL2_indicator_of_measurable
theorem inner_condExpL2_eq_inner_fun (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : α →₂[μ] E)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) :
⟪(condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E), g⟫₂ = ⟪f, g⟫₂ := by
symm
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← inner_sub_left, condExpL2]
simp only [mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mpr hg,
Submodule.orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero f g]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias inner_condexpL2_eq_inner_fun := inner_condExpL2_eq_inner_fun
section Real
variable {hm : m ≤ m0}
theorem integral_condExpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real (f : Lp 𝕜 2 μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ∫ x in s, (condExpL2 𝕜 𝕜 hm f : α → 𝕜) x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_one (𝕜 := 𝕜) (hm s hs) hμs f]
have h_eq_inner : ∫ x in s, (condExpL2 𝕜 𝕜 hm f : α → 𝕜) x ∂μ =
inner (indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs (1 : 𝕜)) (condExpL2 𝕜 𝕜 hm f) := by
rw [L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_one (hm s hs) hμs]
rw [h_eq_inner, ← inner_condExpL2_left_eq_right, condExpL2_indicator_of_measurable hm hs hμs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias integral_condexpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real := integral_condExpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_le (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (f : Lp ℝ 2 μ) :
∫⁻ x in s, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f : α → ℝ) x‖₊ ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
let h_meas := lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable (condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f)
let g := h_meas.choose
have hg_meas : StronglyMeasurable[m] g := h_meas.choose_spec.1
have hg_eq : g =ᵐ[μ] condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f := h_meas.choose_spec.2.symm
have hg_eq_restrict : g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f := ae_restrict_of_ae hg_eq
have hg_nnnorm_eq : (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] fun x =>
(‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f : α → ℝ) x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
refine hg_eq_restrict.mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
simp_rw [hx]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hg_nnnorm_eq.symm]
refine lintegral_enorm_le_of_forall_fin_meas_integral_eq
hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable f) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hs hμs
· exact integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top f fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs
· exact hg_meas
· rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr hg_eq_restrict]
exact integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs f
· intro t ht hμt
rw [← integral_condExpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real f ht hμt.ne]
exact setIntegral_congr_ae (hm t ht) (hg_eq.mono fun x hx _ => hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_le := lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_le
theorem condExpL2_ae_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) {f : Lp ℝ 2 μ}
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) : condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] (0 : α → ℝ) := by
suffices h_nnnorm_eq_zero : ∫⁻ x in s, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm f : α → ℝ) x‖₊ ∂μ = 0 by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff] at h_nnnorm_eq_zero
· refine h_nnnorm_eq_zero.mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only at hx
rw [Pi.zero_apply] at hx ⊢
· rwa [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, nnnorm_eq_zero] at hx
· refine Measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal (Measurable.nnnorm ?_)
exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).measurable
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
refine (lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_le hs hμs f).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff]
· refine hf.mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hx]
simp
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpL2_ae_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero := condExpL2_ae_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le_real (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht : MeasurableSet[m] t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) := by
refine (lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_le ht hμt _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
have h_eq :
∫⁻ x in t, ‖(indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)) x‖₊ ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in t, s.indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) x ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae ?_)
refine (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ hs hμs (1 : ℝ)).mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hx]
classical
simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp
rw [h_eq, lintegral_indicator hs, lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
simp only [one_mul, Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le_real := lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le_real
end Real
/-- `condExpL2` commutes with taking inner products with constants. See the lemma
`condExpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap` for a more general result about commuting with continuous
linear maps. -/
theorem condExpL2_const_inner (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp E 2 μ) (c : E) :
condExpL2 𝕜 𝕜 hm (((Lp.memLp f).const_inner c).toLp fun a => ⟪c, f a⟫) =ᵐ[μ]
fun a => ⟪c, (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫ := by
have h_mem_Lp : MemLp (fun a => ⟪c, (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫) 2 μ := by
refine MemLp.const_inner _ ?_; exact Lp.memLp _
have h_eq : h_mem_Lp.toLp _ =ᵐ[μ] fun a => ⟪c, (condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫ :=
h_mem_Lp.coeFn_toLp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_eq
refine Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq' 𝕜 hm _ _ two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(fun s _ hμs => integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro s _ hμs
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr (ae_restrict_of_ae h_eq)]
exact (integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _).const_inner _
· intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_condExpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real _ hs hμs.ne,
integral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h_eq), ←
L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_eq_setIntegral_inner 𝕜 (↑(condExpL2 E 𝕜 hm f)) (hm s hs) c hμs.ne,
← inner_condExpL2_left_eq_right, condExpL2_indicator_of_measurable _ hs,
L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_eq_setIntegral_inner 𝕜 f (hm s hs) c hμs.ne,
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs)
((MemLp.coeFn_toLp ((Lp.memLp f).const_inner c)).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
· exact lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable _
· refine AEStronglyMeasurable.congr ?_ h_eq.symm
exact (lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable _).const_inner
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpL2_const_inner := condExpL2_const_inner
/-- `condExpL2` verifies the equality of integrals defining the conditional expectation. -/
theorem integral_condExpL2_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp E' 2 μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ∫ x in s, (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α → E') x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ←
integral_sub' (integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs)
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs)]
refine integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero 𝕜 _ ?_ ?_
· rw [integrable_congr (ae_restrict_of_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub (↑(condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f)) f).symm)]
exact integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs
intro c
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, inner_sub_right]
rw [integral_sub
((integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs).const_inner c)
((integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs).const_inner c)]
have h_ae_eq_f := MemLp.coeFn_toLp (E := 𝕜) ((Lp.memLp f).const_inner c)
rw [sub_eq_zero, ←
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condExpL2_const_inner hm f c).mono fun x hx _ => hx), ←
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) (h_ae_eq_f.mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact integral_condExpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real _ hs hμs
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias integral_condexpL2_eq := integral_condExpL2_eq
variable {E'' 𝕜' : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜'] [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜' E'']
[CompleteSpace E''] [NormedSpace ℝ E'']
variable (𝕜 𝕜')
theorem condExpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap (hm : m ≤ m0) (T : E' →L[ℝ] E'') (f : α →₂[μ] E') :
(condExpL2 E'' 𝕜' hm (T.compLp f) : α →₂[μ] E'') =ᵐ[μ]
T.compLp (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E') := by
refine Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq' 𝕜' hm _ _ two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(fun s _ hμs => integrableOn_condExpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _) (fun s _ hμs =>
integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne) ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
rw [T.setIntegral_compLp _ (hm s hs),
T.integral_comp_comm
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne),
integral_condExpL2_eq hm f hs hμs.ne,
integral_condExpL2_eq hm (T.compLp f) hs hμs.ne, T.setIntegral_compLp _ (hm s hs),
T.integral_comp_comm
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top f fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne)]
· exact lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable _
· have h_coe := T.coeFn_compLp (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E')
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_coe
refine AEStronglyMeasurable.congr ?_ h_coe.symm
exact T.continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable (lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap := condExpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 𝕜'}
section CondexpL2Indicator
variable (𝕜)
theorem condExpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : E') :
condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) =ᵐ[μ] fun a =>
(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)) : α → ℝ) a • x := by
rw [indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp hs hμs x]
have h_comp :=
condExpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap ℝ 𝕜 hm (toSpanSingleton ℝ x)
(indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ))
refine h_comp.trans ?_
exact (toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul := condExpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul
theorem condExpL2_indicator_eq_toSpanSingleton_comp (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') : (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α →₂[μ] E') =
(toSpanSingleton ℝ x).compLp (condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1)) := by
ext1
refine (condExpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul 𝕜 hm hs hμs x).trans ?_
have h_comp := (toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp
(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α →₂[μ] ℝ)
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_comp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_comp.symm
filter_upwards with y using rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpL2_indicator_eq_toSpanSingleton_comp := condExpL2_indicator_eq_toSpanSingleton_comp
variable {𝕜}
theorem setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet[m] t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ ≤
μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
calc
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ =
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a • x‖₊ ∂μ :=
setLIntegral_congr_fun (hm t ht)
((condExpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul 𝕜 hm hs hμs x).mono fun a ha _ => by rw [ha])
_ = (∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a‖₊ ∂μ) * ‖x‖₊ := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_smul, ENNReal.coe_mul]
rw [lintegral_mul_const]
exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).enorm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
mul_le_mul_right' (lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le_real hs hμs ht hμt) _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias setLIntegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le := setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : E') [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∫⁻ a, ‖(condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ μ s * ‖x‖₊ := by
refine lintegral_le_of_forall_fin_meas_trim_le hm (μ s * ‖x‖₊) fun t ht hμt => ?_
refine (setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le hm hs hμs x ht hμt).trans ?_
gcongr
apply Set.inter_subset_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le := lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le
/-- If the measure `μ.trim hm` is sigma-finite, then the conditional expectation of a measurable set
with finite measure is integrable. -/
theorem integrable_condExpL2_indicator (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') :
Integrable (ε := E') (condExpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x)) μ := by
refine integrable_of_forall_fin_meas_le' hm (μ s * ‖x‖₊)
(ENNReal.mul_lt_top hμs.lt_top ENNReal.coe_lt_top) ?_ ?_
· exact Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _
· refine fun t ht hμt =>
(setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le hm hs hμs x ht hμt).trans ?_
gcongr
apply Set.inter_subset_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias integrable_condexpL2_indicator := integrable_condExpL2_indicator
end CondexpL2Indicator
section CondexpIndSMul
variable [NormedSpace ℝ G] {hm : m ≤ m0}
/-- Conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure, in L2. -/
noncomputable def condExpIndSMul (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
Lp G 2 μ :=
(toSpanSingleton ℝ x).compLpL 2 μ (condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndSMul := condExpIndSMul
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_condExpIndSMul (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x) μ := by
have h : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) μ :=
aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL2 _ _
rw [condExpIndSMul]
exact ((toSpanSingleton ℝ x).continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable h).congr
(coeFn_compLpL _ _).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable'_condExpIndSMul := aestronglyMeasurable_condExpIndSMul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpIndSMul := aestronglyMeasurable_condExpIndSMul
theorem condExpIndSMul_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x y : G) :
condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs (x + y) = condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x + condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs y := by
simp_rw [condExpIndSMul]; rw [toSpanSingleton_add, add_compLpL, add_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndSMul_add := condExpIndSMul_add
theorem condExpIndSMul_smul (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ) (x : G) :
condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x := by
simp_rw [condExpIndSMul]; rw [toSpanSingleton_smul, smul_compLpL, smul_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndSMul_smul := condExpIndSMul_smul
theorem condExpIndSMul_smul' [NormedSpace ℝ F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : 𝕜) (x : F) :
condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x := by
rw [condExpIndSMul, condExpIndSMul, toSpanSingleton_smul',
(toSpanSingleton ℝ x).smul_compLpL c, smul_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndSMul_smul' := condExpIndSMul_smul'
theorem condExpIndSMul_ae_eq_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x =ᵐ[μ] fun a =>
(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a • x :=
(toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLpL _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndSMul_ae_eq_smul := condExpIndSMul_ae_eq_smul
theorem setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpIndSMul_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet[m] t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) :
(∫⁻ a in t, ‖condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x a‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
calc
∫⁻ a in t, ‖condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x a‖₊ ∂μ =
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a • x‖₊ ∂μ :=
setLIntegral_congr_fun (hm t ht)
((condExpIndSMul_ae_eq_smul hm hs hμs x).mono fun a ha _ => by rw [ha])
_ = (∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a‖₊ ∂μ) * ‖x‖₊ := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_smul, ENNReal.coe_mul]
rw [lintegral_mul_const]
exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).enorm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
mul_le_mul_right' (lintegral_nnnorm_condExpL2_indicator_le_real hs hμs ht hμt) _
|
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias setLIntegral_nnnorm_condexpIndSMul_le := setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpIndSMul_le
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_condExpIndSMul_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] : ∫⁻ a, ‖condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ μ s * ‖x‖₊ := by
refine lintegral_le_of_forall_fin_meas_trim_le hm (μ s * ‖x‖₊) fun t ht hμt => ?_
refine (setLIntegral_nnnorm_condExpIndSMul_le hm hs hμs x ht hμt).trans ?_
gcongr
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/CondexpL2.lean | 477 | 485 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Hitting time
Given a stochastic process, the hitting time provides the first time the process "hits" some
subset of the state space. The hitting time is a stopping time in the case that the time index is
discrete and the process is adapted (this is true in a far more general setting however we have
only proved it for the discrete case so far).
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.hitting`: the hitting time of a stochastic process
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.hitting_isStoppingTime`: a discrete hitting time of an adapted process is a
stopping time
## Implementation notes
In the definition of the hitting time, we bound the hitting time by an upper and lower bound.
This is to ensure that our result is meaningful in the case we are taking the infimum of an
empty set or the infimum of a set which is unbounded from below. With this, we can talk about
hitting times indexed by the natural numbers or the reals. By taking the bounds to be
`⊤` and `⊥`, we obtain the standard definition in the case that the index is `ℕ∞` or `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Hitting time: given a stochastic process `u` and a set `s`, `hitting u s n m` is the first time
`u` is in `s` after time `n` and before time `m` (if `u` does not hit `s` after time `n` and
before `m` then the hitting time is simply `m`).
The hitting time is a stopping time if the process is adapted and discrete. -/
noncomputable def hitting [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (u : ι → Ω → β)
(s : Set β) (n m : ι) : Ω → ι :=
fun x => if ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc n m, u j x ∈ s
then sInf (Set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i x ∈ s}) else m
open scoped Classical in
theorem hitting_def [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (u : ι → Ω → β) (s : Set β) (n m : ι) :
hitting u s n m =
fun x => if ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc n m, u j x ∈ s then sInf (Set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i x ∈ s}) else m :=
rfl
section Inequalities
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ι] {u : ι → Ω → β} {s : Set β} {n i : ι} {ω : Ω}
/-- This lemma is strictly weaker than `hitting_of_le`. -/
theorem hitting_of_lt {m : ι} (h : m < n) : hitting u s n m ω = m := by
simp_rw [hitting]
have h_not : ¬∃ (j : ι) (_ : j ∈ Set.Icc n m), u j ω ∈ s := by
push_neg
intro j
rw [Set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt h]
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff]
simp only [exists_prop] at h_not
simp only [h_not, if_false]
theorem hitting_le {m : ι} (ω : Ω) : hitting u s n m ω ≤ m := by
simp only [hitting]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
change j ∈ {i | u i ω ∈ s} at hj₂
exact (csInf_le (BddBelow.inter_of_left bddBelow_Icc) (Set.mem_inter hj₁ hj₂)).trans hj₁.2
· exact le_rfl
theorem not_mem_of_lt_hitting {m k : ι} (hk₁ : k < hitting u s n m ω) (hk₂ : n ≤ k) :
u k ω ∉ s := by
classical
intro h
have hexists : ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s := ⟨k, ⟨hk₂, le_trans hk₁.le <| hitting_le _⟩, h⟩
refine not_le.2 hk₁ ?_
simp_rw [hitting, if_pos hexists]
exact csInf_le bddBelow_Icc.inter_of_left ⟨⟨hk₂, le_trans hk₁.le <| hitting_le _⟩, h⟩
theorem hitting_eq_end_iff {m : ι} : hitting u s n m ω = m ↔
(∃ j ∈ Set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) → sInf (Set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i ω ∈ s}) = m := by
classical
rw [hitting, ite_eq_right_iff]
theorem hitting_of_le {m : ι} (hmn : m ≤ n) : hitting u s n m ω = m := by
obtain rfl | h := le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hmn
· classical
| rw [hitting, ite_eq_right_iff, forall_exists_index]
conv => intro; rw [Set.mem_Icc, Set.Icc_self, and_imp, and_imp]
intro i hi₁ hi₂ hi
rw [Set.inter_eq_left.2, csInf_singleton]
exact Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 (le_antisymm hi₂ hi₁ ▸ hi)
· exact hitting_of_lt h
theorem le_hitting {m : ι} (hnm : n ≤ m) (ω : Ω) : n ≤ hitting u s n m ω := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/HittingTime.lean | 102 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
/-!
# Successors and predecessors of integers
In this file, we show that `ℤ` is both an archimedean `SuccOrder` and an archimedean `PredOrder`.
-/
open Function Order
namespace Int
-- so that Lean reads `Int.succ` through `SuccOrder.succ`
@[instance] abbrev instSuccOrder : SuccOrder ℤ :=
{ SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff succ fun {_ _} => Iff.rfl with succ := succ }
instance instSuccAddOrder : SuccAddOrder ℤ := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
-- so that Lean reads `Int.pred` through `PredOrder.pred`
@[instance] abbrev instPredOrder : PredOrder ℤ where
pred := pred
pred_le _ := (sub_one_lt_of_le le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred ha := ((sub_one_lt_of_le le_rfl).not_le ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt {_ _} := le_sub_one_of_lt
instance instPredSubOrder : PredSubOrder ℤ := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_succ : Order.succ = succ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred_eq_pred : Order.pred = pred :=
rfl
instance : IsSuccArchimedean ℤ :=
⟨fun {a b} h =>
⟨(b - a).toNat, by rw [succ_iterate, toNat_sub_of_le h, ← add_sub_assoc, add_sub_cancel_left]⟩⟩
instance : IsPredArchimedean ℤ :=
⟨fun {a b} h =>
⟨(b - a).toNat, by rw [pred_iterate, toNat_sub_of_le h, sub_sub_cancel]⟩⟩
/-! ### Covering relation -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_covBy {a b : ℕ} : (a : ℤ) ⋖ b ↔ a ⋖ b := by
rw [Order.covBy_iff_add_one_eq, Order.covBy_iff_add_one_eq]
exact Int.natCast_inj
end Int
alias ⟨_, CovBy.intCast⟩ := Int.natCast_covBy
| Mathlib/Data/Int/SuccPred.lean | 88 | 90 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-!
# Determinant of a matrix
This file defines the determinant of a matrix, `Matrix.det`, and its essential properties.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.det`: the determinant of a square matrix, as a sum over permutations
- `Matrix.detRowAlternating`: the determinant, as an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix
## Main results
- `det_mul`: the determinant of `A * B` is the product of determinants
- `det_zero_of_row_eq`: the determinant is zero if there is a repeated row
- `det_block_diagonal`: the determinant of a block diagonal matrix is a product
of the blocks' determinants
## Implementation notes
It is possible to configure `simp` to compute determinants. See the file
`MathlibTest/matrix.lean` for some examples.
-/
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
/-- `det` is an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix. -/
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
/-- The determinant of a matrix given by the Leibniz formula. -/
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
theorem det_eq_detp_sub_detp (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = M.detp 1 - M.detp (-1) := by
rw [det_apply, ← Equiv.sum_comp (Equiv.inv (Perm n)), ← ofSign_disjUnion, sum_disjUnion]
simp_rw [inv_apply, sign_inv, sub_eq_add_neg, detp, ← sum_neg_distrib]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) <;>
rw [mem_ofSign.mp hσ, ← Equiv.prod_comp σ] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
obtain ⟨x, h3⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2)
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
/-- If `n` has only one element, the determinant of an `n` by `n` matrix is just that element.
Although `Unique` implies `DecidableEq` and `Fintype`, the instances might
not be syntactically equal. Thus, we need to fill in the args explicitly. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ = ∑ p : n → n with Bijective p, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
refine (sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij ↦ det_mul_aux ?_).symm
simpa only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
/-- The determinant of a matrix, as a monoid homomorphism. -/
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
/-- On square matrices, `mul_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_left_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_right_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M.val * N * M⁻¹.val) = det N := by
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj' (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M⁻¹.val * N * ↑M.val) = det N :=
det_units_conj M⁻¹ N
/-- Transposing a matrix preserves the determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_transpose (M : Matrix n n R) : Mᵀ.det = M.det := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
refine Fintype.sum_bijective _ inv_involutive.bijective _ _ ?_
intro σ
| rw [sign_inv]
congr 1
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 204 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring
in `n` variables. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'' :
FiniteType R S ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial']
rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
exact ⟨Fintype.card ι, AlgHom.comp f equiv.symm.toAlgHom, by simpa using hsur⟩
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R (Fin n)) f hsur
instance prod [hA : FiniteType R A] [hB : FiniteType R B] : FiniteType R (A × B) :=
⟨by rw [← Subalgebra.prod_top]; exact hA.1.prod hB.1⟩
theorem isNoetherianRing (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] [IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing S := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h.1
apply
isNoetherianRing_of_surjective (MvPolynomial s R) S
(MvPolynomial.aeval (↑) : MvPolynomial s R →ₐ[R] S).toRingHom
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, ← AlgHom.coe_range,
← Algebra.adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]
rfl
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_iff_finiteType (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R S :=
S.fg_top.symm.trans ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.out⟩
end FiniteType
end Algebra
end ModuleAndAlgebra
namespace RingHom
variable {A B C : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
/-- A ring morphism `A →+* B` is of `FiniteType` if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
@[algebraize]
def FiniteType (f : A →+* B) : Prop :=
@Algebra.FiniteType A B _ _ f.toAlgebra
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (A) in
theorem id : FiniteType (RingHom.id A) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.self A
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_surjective hf
{ g with
toFun := g
commutes' := fun a => rfl }
hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →+* B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType := by
rw [← f.comp_id]
exact (id A).comp_surjective hf
theorem comp {g : B →+* C} {f : A →+* B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.trans hf hg
theorem of_finite {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : f.FiniteType :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
alias _root_.RingHom.Finite.to_finiteType := of_finite
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType := by
algebraize [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_restrictScalars_finiteType A B C
end FiniteType
end RingHom
namespace AlgHom
variable {R A B C : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C]
/-- An algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] B` is of `FiniteType` if it is of finite type as ring morphism.
In other words, if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
def FiniteType (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Prop :=
f.toRingHom.FiniteType
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
RingHom.Finite.finiteType hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (R A)
theorem id : FiniteType (AlgHom.id R A) :=
RingHom.FiniteType.id A
variable {R A}
theorem comp {g : B →ₐ[R] C} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp hg hf
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp_surjective hf hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_surjective f.toRingHom hf
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_comp_finiteType h
end FiniteType
end AlgHom
theorem algebraMap_finiteType_iff_algebra_finiteType {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] : (algebraMap R A).FiniteType ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R A := by
dsimp [RingHom.FiniteType]
constructor <;> (intro h; convert h; apply Algebra.algebra_ext; exact congrFun rfl)
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
open Algebra AddSubmonoid Submodule
section Span
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- An element of `R[M]` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_adjoin_support (f : R[M]) : f ∈ adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support) := by
suffices span R (of' R M '' f.support) ≤
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support)) by
exact this (mem_span_support f)
rw [Submodule.span_le]
exact subset_adjoin
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the set of supports of
elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
refine le_antisymm le_top ?_
rw [← hS, adjoin_le_iff]
intro f hf
have hincl :
of' R M '' f.support ⊆ ⋃ (g : R[M]) (_ : g ∈ S), of' R M '' g.support := by
intro s hs
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨f, ⟨hf, hs⟩⟩
exact adjoin_mono hincl (mem_adjoin_support f)
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the image of the union of
the supports of elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen' {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
suffices (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M) by
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen hS
simp only [Set.image_iUnion]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- If `R[M]` is of finite type, then there is a `G : Finset M` such that its
image generates, as algebra, `R[M]`. -/
theorem exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top [h : FiniteType R R[M]] :
∃ G : Finset M, Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' G) = ⊤ := by
| obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h
letI : DecidableEq M := Classical.decEq M
use Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support
have : (Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support : Set M) = ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M) := by
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rw [this]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 369 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-! # Power function on `ℂ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are complex numbers.
-/
open Real Topology Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
namespace Complex
/-- The complex power function `x ^ y`, given by `x ^ y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the
principal determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and
`0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : Pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨cpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
if_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff {x y : ℂ} :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or, ne_eq, not_not]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff_of_exponent_ne_zero {x y : ℂ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [cpow_def, *]
theorem zero_cpow_eq_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [cpow_def, eq_self_iff_true, if_true] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true] at hyp
right
exact ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [if_neg h] at hyp
left
exact ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_cpow h
· exact cpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_cpow_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : a = (0 : ℂ) ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_cpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp]
theorem one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [one_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def, ite_mul, boole_mul, mul_ite, mul_boole]
simp_all [exp_add, mul_add]
theorem cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc]
theorem cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [cpow_def, neg_eq_zero, mul_neg]
split_ifs <;> simp [exp_neg]
theorem cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ := by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
/-- See also `Complex.cpow_int_mul'`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy <;> simp [*, zero_zpow]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_left_comm, exp_int_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_int (x y : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by rw [mul_comm, cpow_int_mul]
lemma cpow_nat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n :=
mod_cast cpow_int_mul x n y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (ofNat(n) * y) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_nat_mul x n y
lemma cpow_mul_nat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [mul_comm, cpow_nat_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_ofNat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (y * ofNat(n)) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_mul_nat x y n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_natCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_nat_mul x n 1
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = x ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_natCast x n
theorem cpow_two (x : ℂ) : x ^ (2 : ℂ) = x ^ (2 : ℕ) := cpow_ofNat x 2
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_intCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_int_mul x n 1
@[simp]
theorem cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀, cpow_one]
assumption_mod_cast
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(x ^ ((ofNat(n) : ℂ)⁻¹)) ^ (ofNat(n) : ℕ) = x :=
cpow_nat_inv_pow _ (NeZero.ne n)
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_int_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℤ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
rw [mul_comm] at hlt hle
rw [cpow_mul, cpow_intCast] <;> simpa [log_im]
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_nat_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_nat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y :=
cpow_int_mul' hlt hle y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -π < OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg)
(hle : OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n * y) = (x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ y :=
cpow_nat_mul' hlt hle y
lemma pow_cpow_nat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h₀ : n ≠ 0) (hlt : -(π / n) < x.arg) (hle : x.arg ≤ π / n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul', mul_inv_cancel₀ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 h₀), cpow_one]
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt), neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt)]
lemma pow_cpow_ofNat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -(π / OfNat.ofNat n) < x.arg)
(hle : x.arg ≤ π / OfNat.ofNat n) :
(x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ ((OfNat.ofNat n : ℂ)⁻¹) = x :=
pow_cpow_nat_inv (NeZero.ne n) hlt hle
/-- See also `Complex.pow_cpow_ofNat_inv` for a version that also works for `x * I`, `0 ≤ x`. -/
lemma sq_cpow_two_inv {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 < x.re) : (x ^ (2 : ℕ)) ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ) = x :=
pow_cpow_ofNat_inv (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff.2 <| .inl hx)
(arg_le_pi_div_two_iff.2 <| .inl hx.le)
theorem mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (r : ℂ) :
((a : ℂ) * (b : ℂ)) ^ r = (a : ℂ) ^ r * (b : ℂ) ^ r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· simp only [cpow_zero, mul_one]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le ha with (rfl | ha')
· rw [ofReal_zero, zero_mul, zero_cpow hr, zero_mul]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hb with (rfl | hb')
· rw [ofReal_zero, mul_zero, zero_cpow hr, mul_zero]
have ha'' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha'.ne'
have hb'' : (b : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hb'.ne'
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero ha'' hb''), log_ofReal_mul ha' hb'', ofReal_log ha,
add_mul, exp_add, ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero ha'', ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero hb'']
lemma natCast_mul_natCast_cpow (m n : ℕ) (s : ℂ) : (m * n : ℂ) ^ s = m ^ s * n ^ s :=
ofReal_natCast m ▸ ofReal_natCast n ▸ mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg m.cast_nonneg n.cast_nonneg s
lemma natCast_cpow_natCast_mul (n m : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n : ℂ) ^ (m * z) = ((n : ℂ) ^ m) ^ z := by
refine cpow_nat_mul' (x := n) (n := m) ?_ ?_ z
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff, pi_pos]
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, pi_pos.le]
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
x⁻¹ ^ n = if x.arg = π then conj (x ^ conj n)⁻¹ else (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [Complex.cpow_def, log_inv_eq_ite, inv_eq_zero, map_eq_zero, ite_mul, neg_mul,
RCLike.conj_inv, apply_ite conj, apply_ite exp, apply_ite Inv.inv, map_zero, map_one, exp_neg,
inv_one, inv_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj]
split_ifs with hx hn ha ha <;> rfl
theorem inv_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : x⁻¹ ^ n = (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
/-- `Complex.inv_cpow_eq_ite` with the `ite` on the other side. -/
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite' (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
(x ^ n)⁻¹ = if x.arg = π then conj (x⁻¹ ^ conj n) else x⁻¹ ^ n := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, apply_ite conj, conj_conj, conj_conj]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· rw [inv_cpow _ _ h]
theorem conj_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
conj x ^ n = if x.arg = π then x ^ n else conj (x ^ conj n) := by
simp_rw [cpow_def, map_eq_zero, apply_ite conj, map_one, map_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj,
log_conj_eq_ite]
split_ifs with hcx hn hx <;> rfl
theorem conj_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : conj x ^ n = conj (x ^ conj n) := by
rw [conj_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
theorem cpow_conj (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : x ^ conj n = conj (conj x ^ n) := by
rw [conj_cpow _ _ hx, conj_conj]
lemma natCast_add_one_cpow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n + 1 : ℂ) ^ z ≠ 0 :=
mt (cpow_eq_zero_iff ..).mp fun H ↦ by norm_cast at H; exact H.1
end Complex
| -- section Tactics
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Complex.lean | 243 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
/-!
# Limits and asymptotics of power functions at `+∞`
This file contains results about the limiting behaviour of power functions at `+∞`. For convenience
some results on asymptotics as `x → 0` (those which are not just continuity statements) are also
located here.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-!
## Limits at `+∞`
-/
section Limits
open Real Filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [(atTop_basis' 0).tendsto_right_iff]
intro b hb
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 0, eventually_ge_atTop (b ^ (1 / y))] with x hx₀ hx
simpa (disch := positivity) [Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos] using hx
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (-y)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) fun _ hx => (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm)
(tendsto_rpow_atTop hy).inv_tendsto_atTop
open Asymptotics in
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : -1 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with hb|rfl|hb
case inl => -- b < 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos hb.le, hb.ne, ite_false]
rw [← isLittleO_const_iff (c := (1 : ℝ)) one_ne_zero, (one_mul (1 : ℝ)).symm]
refine IsLittleO.mul_isBigO ?exp ?cos
case exp =>
rw [isLittleO_const_iff one_ne_zero]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, log_neg_iff (by linarith)]
linarith
case cos =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
exact ⟨1, Eventually.of_forall fun x => by simp [Real.abs_cos_le_one]⟩
case inr.inl => -- b = 0
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (Iff.mpr pure_le_nhds_iff rfl)
rw [tendsto_pure]
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with _ hx
simp [hx]
case inr.inr => -- b > 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos hb]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_neg_iff hb).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot atTop := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_neg_iff hb₀).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (a / (b * x + c))) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine
Tendsto.congr' ?_
((tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one.comp
(by
simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using
(tendsto_const_nhds (x := a)).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop b c 1 hb))).comp
tendsto_log_atTop)
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_Ioi, Function.comp_apply] at hx ⊢
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))]
field_simp
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1 : ℝ) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (-(1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1 : ℝ)) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
/-- The function `exp(x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real number `s`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp x / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := archimedean_iff_nat_lt.1 Real.instArchimedean s
refine tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ?_ (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0 : ℝ), eventually_ge_atTop (1 : ℝ)] with x hx₀ hx₁
gcongr
simpa using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx₁ hn.le
/-- The function `exp (b * x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp (b * x) / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
refine ((tendsto_rpow_atTop hb).comp (tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s / b))).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with x hx₀
simp [Real.div_rpow, (exp_pos x).le, rpow_nonneg, ← Real.rpow_mul, ← exp_mul,
mul_comm x, hb.ne', *]
/-- The function `x ^ s * exp (-b * x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s b hb).inv_tendsto_atTop.congr' ?_
filter_upwards with x using by simp [exp_neg, inv_div, div_eq_mul_inv _ (exp _)]
nonrec theorem NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop]
intro b
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := tendsto_atTop_atTop.mp (tendsto_rpow_atTop hy) b
use c.toNNReal
intro a ha
exact mod_cast hc a (Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe.mp ha)
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_rpow_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ y) (𝓝 ⊤) (𝓝 ⊤) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
intro x
obtain ⟨c, _, hc⟩ :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff atTop_basis_Ioi).mp (NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop hy) x trivial
have hc' : Set.Ioi ↑c ∈ 𝓝 (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) := Ioi_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_lt_top
filter_upwards [hc'] with a ha
by_cases ha' : a = ⊤
· simp [ha', hy]
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha'
| simp only [Set.mem_Ioi, coe_lt_coe] at ha hc
rw [← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hy.le]
exact mod_cast hc a ha
end Limits
/-!
## Asymptotic results: `IsBigO`, `IsLittleO` and `IsTheta`
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Asymptotics.lean | 158 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.lpSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Hilbert sum of a family of inner product spaces
Given a family `(G : ι → Type*) [Π i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)]` of inner product spaces, this
file equips `lp G 2` with an inner product space structure, where `lp G 2` consists of those
dependent functions `f : Π i, G i` for which `∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ 2`, the sum of the norms-squared, is
summable. This construction is sometimes called the *Hilbert sum* of the family `G`. By choosing
`G` to be `ι → 𝕜`, the Hilbert space `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` may be seen as a special case of this construction.
We also define a *predicate* `IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V`, where `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E`, expressing that
`V` is an `OrthogonalFamily` and that the associated map `lp G 2 →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is surjective.
## Main definitions
* `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry`: Given a Hilbert space `E`, a family `G` of inner product
spaces and a family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E` with
mutually-orthogonal images, there is an induced isometric embedding of the Hilbert sum of `G`
into `E`.
* `IsHilbertSum`: Given a Hilbert space `E`, a family `G` of inner product
spaces and a family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E`,
`IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V` means that `V` is an `OrthogonalFamily` and that the above
linear isometry is surjective.
* `IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv`: If a Hilbert space `E` is a Hilbert sum of the
inner product spaces `G i` with respect to the family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E`, then the
corresponding `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry` can be upgraded to a `LinearIsometryEquiv`.
* `HilbertBasis`: We define a *Hilbert basis* of a Hilbert space `E` to be a structure whose single
field `HilbertBasis.repr` is an isometric isomorphism of `E` with `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` (i.e., the Hilbert
sum of `ι` copies of `𝕜`). This parallels the definition of `Basis`, in `LinearAlgebra.Basis`,
as an isomorphism of an `R`-module with `ι →₀ R`.
* `HilbertBasis.instCoeFun`: More conventionally a Hilbert basis is thought of as a family
`ι → E` of vectors in `E` satisfying certain properties (orthonormality, completeness). We obtain
this interpretation of a Hilbert basis `b` by defining `⇑b`, of type `ι → E`, to be the image
under `b.repr` of `lp.single 2 i (1:𝕜)`. This parallels the definition `Basis.coeFun` in
`LinearAlgebra.Basis`.
* `HilbertBasis.mk`: Make a Hilbert basis of `E` from an orthonormal family `v : ι → E` of vectors
in `E` whose span is dense. This parallels the definition `Basis.mk` in `LinearAlgebra.Basis`.
* `HilbertBasis.mkOfOrthogonalEqBot`: Make a Hilbert basis of `E` from an orthonormal family
`v : ι → E` of vectors in `E` whose span has trivial orthogonal complement.
## Main results
* `lp.instInnerProductSpace`: Construction of the inner product space instance on the Hilbert sum
`lp G 2`. Note that from the file `Analysis.Normed.Lp.lpSpace`, the space `lp G 2` already
held a normed space instance (`lp.normedSpace`), and if each `G i` is a Hilbert space (i.e.,
complete), then `lp G 2` was already known to be complete (`lp.completeSpace`). So the work
here is to define the inner product and show it is compatible.
* `OrthogonalFamily.range_linearIsometry`: Given a family `G` of inner product spaces and a family
`V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` of isometric embeddings of the `G i` into `E` with mutually-orthogonal
images, the image of the embedding `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry` of the Hilbert sum of `G`
into `E` is the closure of the span of the images of the `G i`.
* `HilbertBasis.repr_apply_apply`: Given a Hilbert basis `b` of `E`, the entry `b.repr x i` of
`x`'s representation in `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` is the inner product `⟪b i, x⟫`.
* `HilbertBasis.hasSum_repr`: Given a Hilbert basis `b` of `E`, a vector `x` in `E` can be
expressed as the "infinite linear combination" `∑' i, b.repr x i • b i` of the basis vectors
`b i`, with coefficients given by the entries `b.repr x i` of `x`'s representation in `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)`.
* `exists_hilbertBasis`: A Hilbert space admits a Hilbert basis.
## Keywords
Hilbert space, Hilbert sum, l2, Hilbert basis, unitary equivalence, isometric isomorphism
-/
open RCLike Submodule Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Topology
noncomputable section
variable {ι 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (G i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (G i)]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- `ℓ²(ι, 𝕜)` is the Hilbert space of square-summable functions `ι → 𝕜`, herein implemented
as `lp (fun i : ι => 𝕜) 2`. -/
notation "ℓ²(" ι ", " 𝕜 ")" => lp (fun i : ι => 𝕜) 2
/-! ### Inner product space structure on `lp G 2` -/
namespace lp
theorem summable_inner (f g : lp G 2) : Summable fun i => ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by
-- Apply the Direct Comparison Test, comparing with ∑' i, ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ (summable by Hölder)
refine .of_norm_bounded (fun i => ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖) (lp.summable_mul ?_ f g) ?_
· rw [Real.holderConjugate_iff]; norm_num
intro i
-- Then apply Cauchy-Schwarz pointwise
exact norm_inner_le_norm (𝕜 := 𝕜) _ _
instance instInnerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (lp G 2) :=
{ lp.normedAddCommGroup (E := G) (p := 2) with
inner := fun f g => ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := fun f => by
calc
‖f‖ ^ 2 = ‖f‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := by norm_cast
_ = ∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := lp.norm_rpow_eq_tsum ?_ f
_ = ∑' i, ‖f i‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) := by norm_cast
_ = ∑' i, re ⟪f i, f i⟫ := by simp [norm_sq_eq_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜)]
_ = re (∑' i, ⟪f i, f i⟫) := (RCLike.reCLM.map_tsum ?_).symm
· norm_num
· exact summable_inner f f
conj_inner_symm := fun f g => by
calc
conj _ = conj (∑' i, ⟪g i, f i⟫) := by congr
_ = ∑' i, conj ⟪g i, f i⟫ := RCLike.conjCLE.map_tsum
_ = ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by simp only [inner_conj_symm]
_ = _ := by congr
add_left := fun f₁ f₂ g => by
calc
_ = ∑' i, ⟪(f₁ + f₂) i, g i⟫ := ?_
_ = ∑' i, (⟪f₁ i, g i⟫ + ⟪f₂ i, g i⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_left, Pi.add_apply, coeFn_add]
_ = (∑' i, ⟪f₁ i, g i⟫) + ∑' i, ⟪f₂ i, g i⟫ := Summable.tsum_add ?_ ?_
_ = _ := by congr
· congr
· exact summable_inner f₁ g
· exact summable_inner f₂ g
smul_left := fun f g c => by
calc
_ = ∑' i, ⟪c • f i, g i⟫ := ?_
_ = ∑' i, conj c * ⟪f i, g i⟫ := by simp only [inner_smul_left]
_ = conj c * ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ := tsum_mul_left
_ = _ := ?_
· simp only [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
· congr }
theorem inner_eq_tsum (f g : lp G 2) : ⟪f, g⟫ = ∑' i, ⟪f i, g i⟫ :=
rfl
theorem hasSum_inner (f g : lp G 2) : HasSum (fun i => ⟪f i, g i⟫) ⟪f, g⟫ :=
(summable_inner f g).hasSum
theorem inner_single_left [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (a : G i) (f : lp G 2) :
⟪lp.single 2 i a, f⟫ = ⟪a, f i⟫ := by
refine (hasSum_inner (lp.single 2 i a) f).unique ?_
simp_rw [lp.coeFn_single]
convert hasSum_ite_eq i ⟪a, f i⟫ using 1
ext j
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rw [Pi.single_eq_same]
· simp [Pi.single_eq_of_ne h]
theorem inner_single_right [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (a : G i) (f : lp G 2) :
⟪f, lp.single 2 i a⟫ = ⟪f i, a⟫ := by
simpa [inner_conj_symm] using congr_arg conj (inner_single_left (𝕜 := 𝕜) i a f)
end lp
/-! ### Identification of a general Hilbert space `E` with a Hilbert sum -/
namespace OrthogonalFamily
variable [CompleteSpace E] {V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E} (hV : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V)
include hV
protected theorem summable_of_lp (f : lp G 2) :
Summable fun i => V i (f i) := by
rw [hV.summable_iff_norm_sq_summable]
convert (lp.memℓp f).summable _
· norm_cast
· norm_num
/-- A mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of `E` induce a linear isometry from `lp 2` of the
subspaces into `E`. -/
protected def linearIsometry (hV : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V) : lp G 2 →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E where
toFun f := ∑' i, V i (f i)
map_add' f g := by
simp only [(hV.summable_of_lp f).tsum_add (hV.summable_of_lp g), lp.coeFn_add, Pi.add_apply,
LinearIsometry.map_add]
map_smul' c f := by
simpa only [LinearIsometry.map_smul, Pi.smul_apply, lp.coeFn_smul] using
(hV.summable_of_lp f).tsum_const_smul c
norm_map' f := by
classical
-- needed for lattice instance on `Finset ι`, for `Filter.atTop_neBot`
have H : 0 < (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal := by norm_num
suffices ‖∑' i : ι, V i (f i)‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖f‖ ^ (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal by
exact Real.rpow_left_injOn H.ne' (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) this
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ (lp.hasSum_norm H f)
convert (hV.summable_of_lp f).hasSum.norm.rpow_const (Or.inr H.le) using 1
ext s
exact mod_cast (hV.norm_sum f s).symm
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply (f : lp G 2) : hV.linearIsometry f = ∑' i, V i (f i) :=
rfl
protected theorem hasSum_linearIsometry (f : lp G 2) :
HasSum (fun i => V i (f i)) (hV.linearIsometry f) :=
(hV.summable_of_lp f).hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply_single [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (x : G i) :
hV.linearIsometry (lp.single 2 i x) = V i x := by
rw [hV.linearIsometry_apply, ← tsum_ite_eq i (V i x)]
congr
ext j
rw [lp.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp [h]
protected theorem linearIsometry_apply_dfinsupp_sum_single [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (G i)]
(W₀ : Π₀ i : ι, G i) : hV.linearIsometry (W₀.sum (lp.single 2)) = W₀.sum fun i => V i := by
simp
/-- The canonical linear isometry from the `lp 2` of a mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of
`E` into E, has range the closure of the span of the subspaces. -/
protected theorem range_linearIsometry [∀ i, CompleteSpace (G i)] :
LinearMap.range hV.linearIsometry.toLinearMap =
(⨆ i, LinearMap.range (V i).toLinearMap).topologicalClosure := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine mem_closure_of_tendsto (hV.hasSum_linearIsometry f) (Eventually.of_forall ?_)
intro s
rw [SetLike.mem_coe]
refine sum_mem ?_
intro i _
refine mem_iSup_of_mem i ?_
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self _ (f i)
· apply topologicalClosure_minimal
· refine iSup_le ?_
rintro i x ⟨x, rfl⟩
use lp.single 2 i x
exact hV.linearIsometry_apply_single x
exact hV.linearIsometry.isometry.isUniformInducing.isComplete_range.isClosed
end OrthogonalFamily
section IsHilbertSum
variable (𝕜 G)
variable [CompleteSpace E] (V : ∀ i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (F : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- Given a family of Hilbert spaces `G : ι → Type*`, a Hilbert sum of `G` consists of a Hilbert
space `E` and an orthogonal family `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` such that the induced isometry
`Φ : lp G 2 → E` is surjective.
Keeping in mind that `lp G 2` is "the" external Hilbert sum of `G : ι → Type*`, this is analogous
to `DirectSum.IsInternal`, except that we don't express it in terms of actual submodules. -/
structure IsHilbertSum : Prop where
ofSurjective ::
/-- The orthogonal family constituting the summands in the Hilbert sum. -/
protected OrthogonalFamily : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V
/-- The isometry `lp G 2 → E` induced by the orthogonal family is surjective. -/
protected surjective_isometry : Function.Surjective OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry
variable {𝕜 G V}
/-- If `V : Π i, G i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is an orthogonal family such that the supremum of the ranges of
`V i` is dense, then `(E, V)` is a Hilbert sum of `G`. -/
theorem IsHilbertSum.mk [∀ i, CompleteSpace <| G i] (hVortho : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 G V)
(hVtotal : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ i, LinearMap.range (V i).toLinearMap).topologicalClosure) :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V :=
{ OrthogonalFamily := hVortho
surjective_isometry := by
rw [← LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp
(eq_top_iff.mpr <| hVtotal.trans_eq hVortho.range_linearIsometry.symm) }
/-- This is `Orthonormal.isHilbertSum` in the case of actual inclusions from subspaces. -/
theorem IsHilbertSum.mkInternal [∀ i, CompleteSpace <| F i]
(hFortho : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun i => F i) fun i => (F i).subtypeₗᵢ)
(hFtotal : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ i, F i).topologicalClosure) :
IsHilbertSum 𝕜 (fun i => F i) fun i => (F i).subtypeₗᵢ :=
IsHilbertSum.mk hFortho (by simpa [subtypeₗᵢ_toLinearMap, range_subtype] using hFtotal)
/-- *A* Hilbert sum `(E, V)` of `G` is canonically isomorphic to *the* Hilbert sum of `G`,
| i.e `lp G 2`.
Note that this goes in the opposite direction from `OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry`. -/
noncomputable def IsHilbertSum.linearIsometryEquiv (hV : IsHilbertSum 𝕜 G V) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] lp G 2 :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm <|
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective hV.OrthogonalFamily.linearIsometry hV.surjective_isometry
/-- In the canonical isometric isomorphism between a Hilbert sum `E` of `G` and `lp G 2`,
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/l2Space.lean | 290 | 297 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.ExistsUnique
import Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
/-!
# Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas
-/
open Function
universe u v w
namespace Function
section
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Evaluate a function at an argument. Useful if you want to talk about the partially applied
`Function.eval x : (∀ x, β x) → β x`. -/
@[reducible, simp] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : β x := f x
theorem eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : eval x f = f x :=
rfl
theorem const_def {y : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ y) = const α y :=
rfl
theorem const_injective [Nonempty α] : Injective (const α : β → α → β) := fun _ _ h ↦
let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem const_inj [Nonempty α] {y₁ y₂ : β} : const α y₁ = const α y₂ ↔ y₁ = y₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ const_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem onFun_apply (f : β → β → γ) (g : α → β) (a b : α) : onFun f g a b = f (g a) (g b) :=
rfl
lemma hfunext {α α' : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : ∀a, β a} {f' : ∀a, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', HEq a a' → HEq (f a) (f' a')) : HEq f f' := by
subst hα
have : ∀a, HEq (f a) (f' a) := fun a ↦ h a a (HEq.refl a)
have : β = β' := by funext a; exact type_eq_of_heq (this a)
subst this
apply heq_of_eq
funext a
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
theorem ne_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : ∀ a, β a} : f₁ ≠ f₂ ↔ ∃ a, f₁ a ≠ f₂ a :=
funext_iff.not.trans not_forall
lemma funext_iff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {g : α → β} (x y : α) :
f x = g y ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ funext fun z ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Subsingleton.elim x z, Subsingleton.elim y z] at h
· rw [h, Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem swap_lt {α} [LT α] : swap (· < · : α → α → _) = (· > ·) := rfl
theorem swap_le {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≤ · : α → α → _) = (· ≥ ·) := rfl
theorem swap_gt {α} [LT α] : swap (· > · : α → α → _) = (· < ·) := rfl
theorem swap_ge {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≥ · : α → α → _) = (· ≤ ·) := rfl
protected theorem Bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Injective f := hf.1
protected theorem Bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Surjective f := hf.2
theorem not_injective_iff : ¬ Injective f ↔ ∃ a b, f a = f b ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp only [Injective, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- If the co-domain `β` of an injective function `f : α → β` has decidable equality, then
the domain `α` also has decidable equality. -/
protected def Injective.decidableEq [DecidableEq β] (I : Injective f) : DecidableEq α :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
theorem Injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Injective g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ I <| congr_arg f h
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff (hf : Injective f) (g : γ → α) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨Injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
theorem Injective.of_comp_right {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective f := fun x y h ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hg x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hg y
exact congr_arg g (I h)
theorem Surjective.bijective₂_of_injective {g : γ → α} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g)
(I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨I.of_comp_right hg, hf⟩, I.of_comp, hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨fun I ↦ I.of_comp_right hg.2, fun h ↦ h.comp hg.injective⟩
theorem Injective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Injective (f i)) : Injective (Pi.map f) := fun _ _ h ↦
funext fun i ↦ hf i <| congrFun h _
/-- Composition by an injective function on the left is itself injective. -/
theorem Injective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) : Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
.piMap fun _ ↦ hg
theorem injective_comp_left_iff [Nonempty α] {g : β → γ} :
Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨fun h b₁ b₂ eq ↦ Nonempty.elim ‹_›
(congr_fun <| h (a₁ := fun _ ↦ b₁) (a₂ := fun _ ↦ b₂) <| funext fun _ ↦ eq), (·.comp_left)⟩
@[nontriviality] theorem injective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : Injective f :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[nontriviality] theorem bijective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) : Bijective f :=
⟨injective_of_subsingleton f, fun a ↦ ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim ..⟩⟩
lemma Injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : Injective f) (hf' : Injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
Function.Injective (fun x ↦ if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) := fun x₁ x₂ h => by
dsimp only at h
by_cases h₁ : p x₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : p x₂
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; injection (hf h)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h.symm).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; injection (hf' h)
theorem Surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Surjective f := fun y ↦
let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y
⟨g x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨Surjective.of_comp, fun h ↦ h.comp hg⟩
theorem Surjective.of_comp_left {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective g := fun a ↦ let ⟨c, hc⟩ := S (f a); ⟨c, hf hc⟩
theorem Injective.bijective₂_of_surjective {g : γ → α} (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g)
(S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨hf, S.of_comp⟩, hg, S.of_comp_left hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff' (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective g :=
⟨fun S ↦ S.of_comp_left hf.1, hf.surjective.comp⟩
instance decidableEqPFun (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, DecidableEq (α hp)] :
DecidableEq (∀ hp, α hp)
| f, g => decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
protected theorem Surjective.forall (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun h x ↦ h (f x), fun h y ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
hx ▸ h x⟩
protected theorem Surjective.forall₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall
protected theorem Surjective.forall₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall₂
protected theorem Surjective.exists (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
protected theorem Surjective.exists₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists
protected theorem Surjective.exists₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists₂
theorem Surjective.injective_comp_right (hf : Surjective f) : Injective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun _ _ h ↦ funext <| hf.forall.2 <| congr_fun h
theorem injective_comp_right_iff_surjective {γ : Type*} [Nontrivial γ] :
Injective (fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨not_imp_not.mp fun not_surj inj ↦ not_subsingleton γ ⟨fun c c' ↦ ?_⟩,
(·.injective_comp_right)⟩
have ⟨b₀, hb⟩ := not_forall.mp not_surj
classical have := inj (a₁ := fun _ ↦ c) (a₂ := (if · = b₀ then c' else c)) ?_
· simpa using congr_fun this b₀
ext a; simp only [comp_apply, if_neg fun h ↦ hb ⟨a, h⟩]
protected theorem Surjective.right_cancellable (hf : Surjective f) {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.injective_comp_right.eq_iff
theorem surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (h : ∀ g₁ g₂ : β → Prop, g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f → g₁ = g₂) :
Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective.mp h
theorem bijective_iff_existsUnique (f : α → β) : Bijective f ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃! a : α, f a = b :=
⟨fun hf b ↦
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf.surjective b
⟨a, ha, fun _ ha' ↦ hf.injective (ha'.trans ha.symm)⟩,
fun he ↦ ⟨fun {_a a'} h ↦ (he (f a')).unique h rfl, fun b ↦ (he b).exists⟩⟩
/-- Shorthand for using projection notation with `Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique`. -/
protected theorem Bijective.existsUnique {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (b : β) :
∃! a : α, f a = b :=
(bijective_iff_existsUnique f).mp hf b
theorem Bijective.existsUnique_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃! y, p y) ↔ ∃! x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hpy, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf.surjective y
⟨x, by simpa [hx], fun z (hz : p (f z)) ↦ hf.injective <| hx.symm ▸ hy _ hz⟩,
fun ⟨x, hpx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨f x, hpx, fun y hy ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf.surjective y
hz ▸ congr_arg f (hx _ (by simpa [hz]))⟩⟩
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Bijective f :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff' _ hg) (Surjective.of_comp_iff _ hg.surjective)
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Function.Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Function.Bijective g :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff hf.injective _) (Surjective.of_comp_iff' hf _)
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no surjective functions from `α`
to `Set α`. -/
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → Set α) : ¬Surjective f
| h => let ⟨D, e⟩ := h {a | ¬ f a a}
@iff_not_self (D ∈ f D) <| iff_of_eq <| congr_arg (D ∈ ·) e
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no injective functions from `Set α`
to `α`. -/
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : Set α → α) : ¬Injective f
| i => cantor_surjective (fun a ↦ {b | ∀ U, a = f U → U b}) <|
RightInverse.surjective (fun U ↦ Set.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ h U rfl, fun h _ e ↦ i e ▸ h⟩)
/-- There is no surjection from `α : Type u` into `Type (max u v)`. This theorem
demonstrates why `Type : Type` would be inconsistent in Lean. -/
theorem not_surjective_Type {α : Type u} (f : α → Type max u v) : ¬Surjective f := by
intro hf
let T : Type max u v := Sigma f
cases hf (Set T) with | intro U hU =>
let g : Set T → T := fun s ↦ ⟨U, cast hU.symm s⟩
have hg : Injective g := by
intro s t h
suffices cast hU (g s).2 = cast hU (g t).2 by
simp only [g, cast_cast, cast_eq] at this
assumption
· congr
exact cantor_injective g hg
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def IsPartialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → Option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem isPartialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) :
Injective f := fun _ _ h ↦
Option.some.inj <| ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x y b)
(h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem LeftInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem leftInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : LeftInverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨LeftInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem RightInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem rightInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : RightInverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
| ⟨RightInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem LeftInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : LeftInverse f g)
(hh : LeftInverse h i) : LeftInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
fun a ↦ show h (f (g (i a))) = a by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem RightInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : RightInverse f g)
(hh : RightInverse h i) : RightInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
LeftInverse.comp hh hf
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) : RightInverse f g :=
h
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Basic.lean | 295 | 306 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Galois.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FintypeCat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.SingleObj
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
/-!
# Galois objects in Galois categories
We define when a connected object of a Galois category `C` is Galois in a fiber functor independent
way and show equivalent characterisations.
## Main definitions
* `IsGalois` : Connected object `X` of `C` such that `X / Aut X` is terminal.
## Main results
* `galois_iff_pretransitive` : A connected object `X` is Galois if and only if `Aut X`
acts transitively on `F.obj X` for a fiber functor `F`.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ v₁ v₂ v w
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace PreGaloisCategory
open Limits Functor
noncomputable instance {G : Type v} [Group G] [Finite G] :
PreservesColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) FintypeCat.incl.{w} := by
choose G' hg hf e using Finite.exists_type_univ_nonempty_mulEquiv G
exact Limits.preservesColimitsOfShape_of_equiv (Classical.choice e).toSingleObjEquiv.symm _
/-- A connected object `X` of `C` is Galois if the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal. -/
class IsGalois {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] [GaloisCategory C] (X : C) : Prop
extends IsConnected X where
quotientByAutTerminal : Nonempty (IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X)
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C]
/-- The natural action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X`. -/
instance autMulFiber (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) (X : C) : MulAction (Aut X) (F.obj X) where
smul σ a := F.map σ.hom a
one_smul a := by
show F.map (𝟙 X) a = a
simp only [map_id, FintypeCat.id_apply]
mul_smul g h a := by
show F.map (h.hom ≫ g.hom) a = (F.map h.hom ≫ F.map g.hom) a
simp only [map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply]
variable [GaloisCategory C] (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) [FiberFunctor F]
/-- For a connected object `X` of `C`, the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal if and only if
the quotient `F.obj X / Aut X` has exactly one element. -/
noncomputable def quotientByAutTerminalEquivUniqueQuotient
(X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsTerminal (colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X) ≃
Unique (MulAction.orbitRel.Quotient (Aut X) (F.obj X)) := by
let J : SingleObj (Aut X) ⥤ C := SingleObj.functor (Aut.toEnd X)
let e : (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl).obj (colimit J) ≅ _ :=
preservesColimitIso (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) J ≪≫
(Equiv.toIso <| SingleObj.Types.colimitEquivQuotient (J ⋙ F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl))
apply Equiv.trans
· apply (IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) _).trans
(isLimitEmptyConeEquiv _ (asEmptyCone _) (asEmptyCone _) e)
exact Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
lemma isGalois_iff_aux (X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsGalois X ↔ Nonempty (IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.quotientByAutTerminal, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
/-- Given a fiber functor `F` and a connected object `X` of `C`. Then `X` is Galois if and only if
the natural action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X` is transitive. -/
theorem isGalois_iff_pretransitive (X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsGalois X ↔ MulAction.IsPretransitive (Aut X) (F.obj X) := by
rw [isGalois_iff_aux, Equiv.nonempty_congr <| quotientByAutTerminalEquivUniqueQuotient F X]
exact (MulAction.pretransitive_iff_unique_quotient_of_nonempty (Aut X) (F.obj X)).symm
/-- If `X` is Galois, the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def isTerminalQuotientOfIsGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] :
IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X :=
Nonempty.some IsGalois.quotientByAutTerminal
/-- If `X` is Galois, then the action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X` is
transitive for every fiber functor `F`. -/
instance isPretransitive_of_isGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] :
MulAction.IsPretransitive (Aut X) (F.obj X) := by
rw [← isGalois_iff_pretransitive]
infer_instance
lemma stabilizer_normal_of_isGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] (x : F.obj X) :
Subgroup.Normal (MulAction.stabilizer (Aut F) x) where
conj_mem n ninstab g := by
rw [MulAction.mem_stabilizer_iff]
show g • n • (g⁻¹ • x) = x
have : ∃ (φ : Aut X), F.map φ.hom x = g⁻¹ • x :=
MulAction.IsPretransitive.exists_smul_eq x (g⁻¹ • x)
obtain ⟨φ, h⟩ := this
rw [← h, mulAction_naturality, ninstab, h]
simp
theorem evaluation_aut_surjective_of_isGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) :
Function.Surjective (fun f : Aut A ↦ F.map f.hom a) :=
MulAction.IsPretransitive.exists_smul_eq a
theorem evaluation_aut_bijective_of_isGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) :
Function.Bijective (fun f : Aut A ↦ F.map f.hom a) :=
⟨evaluation_aut_injective_of_isConnected F A a, evaluation_aut_surjective_of_isGalois F A a⟩
/-- For Galois `A` and a point `a` of the fiber of `A`, the evaluation at `A` as an equivalence. -/
noncomputable def evaluationEquivOfIsGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) : Aut A ≃ F.obj A :=
Equiv.ofBijective _ (evaluation_aut_bijective_of_isGalois F A a)
@[simp]
lemma evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_apply (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) (φ : Aut A) :
evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a φ = F.map φ.hom a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_symm_fiber (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a b : F.obj A) :
F.map ((evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a).symm b).hom a = b := by
change (evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a) _ = _
simp
section AutMap
/-- For a morphism from a connected object `A` to a Galois object `B` and an automorphism
of `A`, there exists a unique automorphism of `B` making the canonical diagram commute. -/
lemma exists_autMap {A B : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (σ : Aut A) :
∃! (τ : Aut B), f ≫ τ.hom = σ.hom ≫ f := by
let F := GaloisCategory.getFiberFunctor C
obtain ⟨a⟩ := nonempty_fiber_of_isConnected F A
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F B (F.map f a)).symm (F.map (σ.hom ≫ f) a)
· apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F A B a
simp
· intro τ hτ
apply evaluation_aut_injective_of_isConnected F B (F.map f a)
simpa using congr_fun (F.congr_map hτ) a
|
/-- A morphism from a connected object to a Galois object induces a map on automorphism
groups. This is a group homomorphism (see `autMapHom`). -/
noncomputable def autMap {A B : C} [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (f : A ⟶ B) (σ : Aut A) :
Aut B :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Galois/GaloisObjects.lean | 148 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
/-! # The Wallis formula for Pi
This file establishes the Wallis product for `π` (`Real.tendsto_prod_pi_div_two`). Our proof is
largely about analyzing the behaviour of the sequence `∫ x in 0..π, sin x ^ n` as `n → ∞`.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallis_product
The proof can be broken down into two pieces. The first step (carried out in
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals`) is to use repeated integration by parts to obtain an
explicit formula for this integral, which is rational if `n` is odd and a rational multiple of `π`
if `n` is even.
The second step, carried out here, is to estimate the ratio
`∫ (x : ℝ) in 0..π, sin x ^ (2 * k + 1) / ∫ (x : ℝ) in 0..π, sin x ^ (2 * k)` and prove that
it converges to one using the squeeze theorem. The final product for `π` is obtained after some
algebraic manipulation.
## Main statements
* `Real.Wallis.W`: the product of the first `k` terms in Wallis' formula for `π`.
* `Real.Wallis.W_eq_integral_sin_pow_div_integral_sin_pow`: express `W n` as a ratio of integrals.
* `Real.Wallis.W_le` and `Real.Wallis.le_W`: upper and lower bounds for `W n`.
* `Real.tendsto_prod_pi_div_two`: the Wallis product formula.
-/
open scoped Real Topology Nat
open Filter Finset intervalIntegral
namespace Real
namespace Wallis
/-- The product of the first `k` terms in Wallis' formula for `π`. -/
noncomputable def W (k : ℕ) : ℝ :=
∏ i ∈ range k, (2 * i + 2) / (2 * i + 1) * ((2 * i + 2) / (2 * i + 3))
theorem W_succ (k : ℕ) :
W (k + 1) = W k * ((2 * k + 2) / (2 * k + 1) * ((2 * k + 2) / (2 * k + 3))) :=
prod_range_succ _ _
theorem W_pos (k : ℕ) : 0 < W k := by
induction' k with k hk
· unfold W; simp
· rw [W_succ]
refine mul_pos hk (mul_pos (div_pos ?_ ?_) (div_pos ?_ ?_)) <;> positivity
|
theorem W_eq_factorial_ratio (n : ℕ) :
W n = 2 ^ (4 * n) * n ! ^ 4 / ((2 * n)! ^ 2 * (2 * n + 1)) := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [W, prod_range_zero, Nat.factorial_zero, mul_zero, pow_zero,
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pi/Wallis.lean | 55 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
| refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 851 | 854 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# derivatives of the inverse trigonometric functions
Derivatives of `arcsin` and `arccos`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Filter Real ContDiff
open Set
namespace Real
section Arcsin
theorem deriv_arcsin_aux {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasStrictDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x ∧ ContDiffAt ℝ ω arcsin x := by
rcases h₁.lt_or_lt with h₁ | h₁
· have : 1 - x ^ 2 < 0 := by nlinarith [h₁]
rw [sqrt_eq_zero'.2 this.le, div_zero]
have : arcsin =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ => -(π / 2) :=
(gt_mem_nhds h₁).mono fun y hy => arcsin_of_le_neg_one hy.le
exact ⟨(hasStrictDerivAt_const x _).congr_of_eventuallyEq this.symm,
contDiffAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this⟩
rcases h₂.lt_or_lt with h₂ | h₂
· have : 0 < √(1 - x ^ 2) := sqrt_pos.2 (by nlinarith [h₁, h₂])
simp only [← cos_arcsin, one_div] at this ⊢
exact ⟨sinPartialHomeomorph.hasStrictDerivAt_symm ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ this.ne' (hasStrictDerivAt_sin _),
sinPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv this.ne' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ (hasDerivAt_sin _)
contDiff_sin.contDiffAt⟩
· have : 1 - x ^ 2 < 0 := by nlinarith [h₂]
rw [sqrt_eq_zero'.2 this.le, div_zero]
have : arcsin =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ => π / 2 := (lt_mem_nhds h₂).mono fun y hy => arcsin_of_one_le hy.le
exact ⟨(hasStrictDerivAt_const x _).congr_of_eventuallyEq this.symm,
contDiffAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this⟩
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasStrictDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x :=
(deriv_arcsin_aux h₁ h₂).1
theorem hasDerivAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) :
HasDerivAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_arcsin h₁ h₂).hasDerivAt
theorem contDiffAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≠ -1) (h₂ : x ≠ 1) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt ℝ n arcsin x :=
(deriv_arcsin_aux h₁ h₂).2.of_le le_top
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Ici {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ -1) :
HasDerivWithinAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) (Ici x) x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 1 with (rfl | h')
· convert (hasDerivWithinAt_const (1 : ℝ) _ (π / 2)).congr _ _ <;>
simp +contextual [arcsin_of_one_le]
· exact (hasDerivAt_arcsin h h').hasDerivWithinAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Iic {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 1) :
HasDerivWithinAt arcsin (1 / √(1 - x ^ 2)) (Iic x) x := by
rcases em (x = -1) with (rfl | h')
· convert (hasDerivWithinAt_const (-1 : ℝ) _ (-(π / 2))).congr _ _ <;>
simp +contextual [arcsin_of_le_neg_one]
· exact (hasDerivAt_arcsin h' h).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem differentiableWithinAt_arcsin_Ici {x : ℝ} :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ arcsin (Ici x) x ↔ x ≠ -1 := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => (hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Ici h).differentiableWithinAt⟩
rintro h rfl
have : sin ∘ arcsin =ᶠ[𝓝[≥] (-1 : ℝ)] id := by
filter_upwards [Icc_mem_nhdsGE (neg_lt_self zero_lt_one)] with x using sin_arcsin'
have := h.hasDerivWithinAt.sin.congr_of_eventuallyEq this.symm (by simp)
simpa using (uniqueDiffOn_Ici _ _ left_mem_Ici).eq_deriv _ this (hasDerivWithinAt_id _ _)
theorem differentiableWithinAt_arcsin_Iic {x : ℝ} :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ arcsin (Iic x) x ↔ x ≠ 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (hasDerivWithinAt_arcsin_Iic h).differentiableWithinAt⟩
rw [← neg_neg x, ← image_neg_Ici] at h
have := (h.comp (-x) differentiableWithinAt_id.neg (mapsTo_image _ _)).neg
simpa [(· ∘ ·), differentiableWithinAt_arcsin_Ici] using this
theorem differentiableAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : DifferentiableAt ℝ arcsin x ↔ x ≠ -1 ∧ x ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨differentiableWithinAt_arcsin_Ici.1 h.differentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_arcsin_Iic.1 h.differentiableWithinAt⟩,
fun h => (hasDerivAt_arcsin h.1 h.2).differentiableAt⟩
@[simp]
theorem deriv_arcsin : deriv arcsin = fun x => 1 / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
funext x
by_cases h : x ≠ -1 ∧ x ≠ 1
· exact (hasDerivAt_arcsin h.1 h.2).deriv
· rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (mt differentiableAt_arcsin.1 h)]
simp only [not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
theorem differentiableOn_arcsin : DifferentiableOn ℝ arcsin {-1, 1}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(differentiableAt_arcsin.2
⟨fun h => hx (Or.inl h), fun h => hx (Or.inr h)⟩).differentiableWithinAt
theorem contDiffOn_arcsin {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiffOn ℝ n arcsin {-1, 1}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(contDiffAt_arcsin (mt Or.inl hx) (mt Or.inr hx)).contDiffWithinAt
| theorem contDiffAt_arcsin_iff {x : ℝ} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt ℝ n arcsin x ↔ n = 0 ∨ x ≠ -1 ∧ x ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hn => differentiableAt_arcsin.1 <| h.differentiableAt <|
ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero_withTop.mpr hn,
fun h => h.elim (fun hn => hn.symm ▸ (contDiff_zero.2 continuous_arcsin).contDiffAt) fun hx =>
contDiffAt_arcsin hx.1 hx.2⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/InverseDeriv.lean | 108 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,219 | 2,222 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Order properties of cast of integers
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`),
particularly results involving algebraic homomorphisms or the order structure on `ℤ`
which were not available in the import dependencies of `Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Basic`.
## TODO
Move order lemmas about `Nat.cast`, `Rat.cast`, `NNRat.cast` here.
-/
open Function Nat
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Int
section OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftMono R]
variable [ZeroLEOneClass R]
lemma cast_mono : Monotone (Int.cast : ℤ → R) := by
intro m n h
rw [← sub_nonneg] at h
lift n - m to ℕ using h with k hk
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, ← hk, cast_natCast]
exact k.cast_nonneg'
@[gcongr] protected lemma GCongr.intCast_mono {m n : ℤ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : (m : R) ≤ n := cast_mono hmn
variable [NeZero (1 : R)] {m n : ℤ}
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : ∀ {n : ℤ}, (0 : R) ≤ n ↔ 0 ≤ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp
| -[n+1] => by
have : -(n : R) < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) zero_lt_one
simpa [(negSucc_lt_zero n).not_le, ← sub_eq_add_neg, le_neg] using this.not_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (m : R) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, cast_nonneg, sub_nonneg]
lemma cast_strictMono : StrictMono (fun x : ℤ => (x : R)) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => cast_le.symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (m : R) < n ↔ m < n := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.intCast_strictMono⟩ := Int.cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (n : R) ≤ 0 ↔ n ≤ 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_le]
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : R) < n ↔ 0 < n := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (n : R) < 0 ↔ n < 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
end OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b n : ℤ} {x : R}
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_min : ↑(min a b) = (min a b : R) := Monotone.map_min cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_max : (↑(max a b) : R) = max (a : R) (b : R) := Monotone.map_max cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_abs : (↑|a| : R) = |(a : R)| := by simp [abs_eq_max_neg]
lemma cast_one_le_of_pos (h : 0 < a) : (1 : R) ≤ a := mod_cast Int.add_one_le_of_lt h
lemma cast_le_neg_one_of_neg (h : a < 0) : (a : R) ≤ -1 := by
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg, cast_le]
exact Int.le_sub_one_of_lt h
variable (R) in
lemma cast_le_neg_one_or_one_le_cast_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (n : R) ≤ -1 ∨ 1 ≤ (n : R) :=
hn.lt_or_lt.imp cast_le_neg_one_of_neg cast_one_le_of_pos
lemma nneg_mul_add_sq_of_abs_le_one (n : ℤ) (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : (0 : R) ≤ n * x + n * n := by
have hnx : 0 < n → 0 ≤ x + n := fun hn => by
have := _root_.add_le_add (neg_le_of_abs_le hx) (cast_one_le_of_pos hn)
rwa [neg_add_cancel] at this
have hnx' : n < 0 → x + n ≤ 0 := fun hn => by
have := _root_.add_le_add (le_of_abs_le hx) (cast_le_neg_one_of_neg hn)
rwa [add_neg_cancel] at this
rw [← mul_add, mul_nonneg_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy n 0 with (h | rfl | h)
| · exact Or.inr ⟨mod_cast h.le, hnx' h⟩
· simp [le_total 0 x]
· exact Or.inl ⟨mod_cast h.le, hnx h⟩
-- TODO: move to a better place
omit [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
lemma cast_natAbs : (n.natAbs : R) = |n| := by
cases n
· simp
· rw [abs_eq_natAbs, natAbs_negSucc, cast_succ, cast_natCast, cast_succ]
end LinearOrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Cast.lean | 99 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Units
/-!
# Lemmas about semiconjugate elements in a `GroupWithZero`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {G₀ : Type*}
namespace SemiconjBy
@[simp]
theorem zero_right [MulZeroClass G₀] (a : G₀) : SemiconjBy a 0 0 := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem zero_left [MulZeroClass G₀] (x y : G₀) : SemiconjBy 0 x y := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, zero_mul]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a x y x' y' : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem inv_symm_left_iff₀ : SemiconjBy a⁻¹ x y ↔ SemiconjBy a y x :=
Classical.by_cases (fun ha : a = 0 => by simp only [ha, inv_zero, SemiconjBy.zero_left]) fun ha =>
@units_inv_symm_left_iff _ _ (Units.mk0 a ha) _ _
theorem inv_symm_left₀ (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy a⁻¹ y x :=
SemiconjBy.inv_symm_left_iff₀.2 h
theorem inv_right₀ (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy a x⁻¹ y⁻¹ := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, zero_left]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· subst x
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, @eq_comm _ _ (y * a), mul_eq_zero] at h
simp [h.resolve_right ha]
· have := mul_ne_zero ha hx
rw [h.eq, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
exact @units_inv_right _ _ _ (Units.mk0 x hx) (Units.mk0 y this.1) h
@[simp]
theorem inv_right_iff₀ : SemiconjBy a x⁻¹ y⁻¹ ↔ SemiconjBy a x y :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_inv y ▸ h.inv_right₀, inv_right₀⟩
theorem div_right (h : SemiconjBy a x y) (h' : SemiconjBy a x' y') :
SemiconjBy a (x / x') (y / y') := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact h.mul_right h'.inv_right₀
lemma zpow_right₀ {a x y : G₀} (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : ∀ m : ℤ, SemiconjBy a (x ^ m) (y ^ m)
| (n : ℕ) => by simp [h.pow_right n]
| .negSucc n => by simp only [zpow_negSucc, (h.pow_right (n + 1)).inv_right₀]
| end SemiconjBy
namespace Commute
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b : G₀}
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Semiconj.lean | 62 | 65 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
| @[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,157 | 1,158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-!
# Derivative is measurable
In this file we prove that the derivative of any function with complete codomain is a measurable
function. Namely, we prove:
* `measurableSet_of_differentiableAt`: the set `{x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x}` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv`: the function `fderiv 𝕜 f` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv_apply_const`: for a fixed vector `y`, the function `fun x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 f x y`
is measurable;
* `measurable_deriv`: the function `deriv f` is measurable (for `f : 𝕜 → F`).
We also show the same results for the right derivative on the real line
(see `measurable_derivWithin_Ici` and `measurable_derivWithin_Ioi`), following the same
proof strategy.
We also prove measurability statements for functions depending on a parameter: for `f : α → E → F`,
we show the measurability of `(p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2`. This requires additional
assumptions. We give versions of the above statements (appending `with_param` to their names) when
`f` is continuous and `E` is locally compact.
## Implementation
We give a proof that avoids second-countability issues, by expressing the differentiability set
as a function of open sets in the following way. Define `A (L, r, ε)` to be the set of points
where, on a ball of radius roughly `r` around `x`, the function is uniformly approximated by the
linear map `L`, up to `ε r`. It is an open set.
Let also `B (L, r, s, ε) = A (L, r, ε) ∩ A (L, s, ε)`: we require that at two possibly different
scales `r` and `s`, the function is well approximated by the linear map `L`. It is also open.
We claim that the differentiability set of `f` is exactly
`D = ⋂ ε > 0, ⋃ δ > 0, ⋂ r, s < δ, ⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)`.
In other words, for any `ε > 0`, we require that there is a size `δ` such that, for any two scales
below this size, the function is well approximated by a linear map, common to the two scales.
The set `⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)` is open, as a union of open sets. Converting the intersections and
unions to countable ones (using real numbers of the form `2 ^ (-n)`), it follows that the
differentiability set is measurable.
To prove the claim, there are two inclusions. One is trivial: if the function is differentiable
at `x`, then `x` belongs to `D` (just take `L` to be the derivative, and use that the
differentiability exactly says that the map is well approximated by `L`). This is proved in
`mem_A_of_differentiable` and `differentiable_set_subset_D`.
For the other direction, the difficulty is that `L` in the union may depend on `ε, r, s`. The key
point is that, in fact, it doesn't depend too much on them. First, if `x` belongs both to
`A (L, r, ε)` and `A (L', r, ε)`, then `L` and `L'` have to be close on a shell, and thus
`‖L - L'‖` is bounded by `ε` (see `norm_sub_le_of_mem_A`). Assume now `x ∈ D`. If one has two maps
`L` and `L'` such that `x` belongs to `A (L, r, ε)` and to `A (L', r', ε')`, one deduces that `L` is
close to `L'` by arguing as follows. Consider another scale `s` smaller than `r` and `r'`. Take a
linear map `L₁` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r` and `s` w.r.t. `ε` (it exists as
`x` belongs to `D`). Take also `L₂` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r'` and `s`
w.r.t. `ε'`. Then `L₁` is close to `L` (as they are close on a shell of radius `r`), and `L₂` is
close to `L₁` (as they are close on a shell of radius `s`), and `L'` is close to `L₂` (as they are
close on a shell of radius `r'`). It follows that `L` is close to `L'`, as we claimed.
It follows that the different approximating linear maps that show up form a Cauchy sequence when
`ε` tends to `0`. When the target space is complete, this sequence converges, to a limit `f'`.
With the same kind of arguments, one checks that `f` is differentiable with derivative `f'`.
To show that the derivative itself is measurable, add in the definition of `B` and `D` a set
`K` of continuous linear maps to which `L` should belong. Then, when `K` is complete, the set `D K`
is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable with a derivative in `K`.
## Tags
derivative, measurable function, Borel σ-algebra
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Metric Asymptotics Filter ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
theorem measurable_apply₂ [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither (E →L[𝕜] F) E]
[MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] : Measurable fun p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E => p.1 p.2 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.measurable
end ContinuousLinearMap
section fderiv
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : E → F} (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F))
namespace FDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to make sure that
this is an open set. -/
def A (f : E → F) (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ y ∈ ball x r', ∀ z ∈ ball x r', ‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ < ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a continuous linear map
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of continuous linear maps) that approximates well the
function `f` (up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) : Set E :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem isOpen_A (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : IsOpen (A f L r ε) := by
rw [Metric.isOpen_iff]
rintro x ⟨r', r'_mem, hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between r'_mem.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le r'_mem.2)⟩
refine ⟨r' - s, by linarith, fun x' hx' => ⟨s, this, ?_⟩⟩
have B : ball x' s ⊆ ball x r' := ball_subset (le_of_lt hx')
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (B hy) z (B hz)
theorem isOpen_B {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {r s ε : ℝ} : IsOpen (B f K r s ε) := by
simp [B, isOpen_biUnion, IsOpen.inter, isOpen_A]
theorem A_mono (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [mem_ball.1 hy, r'r.2, @dist_nonneg _ _ y x]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : E}
(hy : y ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
apply le_of_lt
exact hr' _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans_lt r'mem.1) _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hz).trans_lt r'mem.1)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) r ε := by
let δ := (ε / 2) / 2
obtain ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩ :
∃ R > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, ‖f y - f x - fderiv 𝕜 f x (y - x)‖ ≤ δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
eventually_nhds_iff_ball.1 <| hx.hasFDerivAt.isLittleO.bound <| by positivity
refine ⟨R, R_pos, fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := right_mem_Ioc.2 <| half_lt_self hr.1
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - y)‖ =
‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x) - (f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x))‖ := by
simp only [map_sub]; abel_nf
_ ≤ ‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x)‖ + ‖f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x)‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ * ‖z - x‖ + δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
add_le_add (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hz)) (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hy))
_ ≤ δ * r + δ * r := by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm] at hz hy; gcongr
_ = (ε / 2) * r := by ring
_ < ε * r := by gcongr; exacts [hr.1, half_lt_self hε]
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {r ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hr : 0 < r) {x : E}
{L₁ L₂ : E →L[𝕜] F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε) (h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * ε := by
refine opNorm_le_of_shell (half_pos hr) (by positivity) hc ?_
intro y ley ylt
rw [div_div, div_le_iff₀' (mul_pos (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2) (zero_lt_one.trans hc))] at ley
calc
‖(L₁ - L₂) y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x) - (f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x))‖ := by
simp
_ ≤ ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x)‖ + ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
_ = 2 * ε * r := by ring
_ ≤ 2 * ε * (2 * ‖c‖ * ‖y‖) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * ‖c‖ * ε * ‖y‖ := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := by positivity
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨fderiv 𝕜 f x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q →
n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → E →L[𝕜] F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (by positivity) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * ‖c‖ * (ε / (12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε := by field_simp
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole ball of radius `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
have pos : 0 < 4 + 12 * ‖c‖ := by positivity
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos pos) (by norm_num)
rw [eventually_nhds_iff_ball]
refine ⟨(1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1), P, fun y hy => ?_⟩
-- We need to show that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
by_cases y_pos : y = 0
· simp [y_pos]
have yzero : 0 < ‖y‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr y_pos
have y_lt : ‖y‖ < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by simpa using mem_ball_iff_norm.1 hy
have yone : ‖y‖ ≤ 1 := le_trans y_lt.le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < ‖y‖ ∧ ‖y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_trans hk y_lt
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J1 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m (x + y - x)‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
positivity
· simpa only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, pow_succ, mul_one_div] using
h'k
have J2 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left] using J1
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ := by gcongr
-- use the previous estimates to see that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small.
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - f' y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y + (L e (n e) m - f') y‖ :=
congr_arg _ (by simp)
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ + 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
norm_add_le_of_le J2 <| (le_opNorm _ _).trans <| by gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y‖ := by field_simp [ne_of_gt pos]; ring
rw [← this.fderiv] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end FDerivMeasurableAux
open FDerivMeasurableAux
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
variable (𝕜 f)
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete set,
is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
-- Porting note: was
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D, isOpen_B.measurableSet, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [D, differentiable_set_eq_D K hK]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact isOpen_B.measurableSet
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt : MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete 𝕜 f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv : Measurable (fderiv 𝕜 f) := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
fderiv 𝕜 f ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } ∩ { _x | (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans fderiv_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete _ _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableAt _ _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv_apply_const [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (y : E) :
Measurable fun x => fderiv 𝕜 f x y :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.measurable_apply y).comp (measurable_fderiv 𝕜 f)
variable {𝕜}
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : Measurable (deriv f) := by
simpa only [fderiv_deriv] using measurable_fderiv_apply_const 𝕜 f 1
theorem stronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : StronglyMeasurable (deriv f) := by
borelize F
rcases h.out with h𝕜|hF
· exact stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2
⟨measurable_deriv f, isSeparable_range_deriv _⟩
· exact (measurable_deriv f).stronglyMeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) : AEMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(measurable_deriv f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_deriv f).aestronglyMeasurable
end fderiv
section RightDeriv
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable {f : ℝ → F} (K : Set F)
namespace RightDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `h ↦ h • L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to
make sure that this is open on the right. -/
def A (f : ℝ → F) (L : F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ᵉ (y ∈ Icc x (x + r')) (z ∈ Icc x (x + r')),
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a vector
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of vectors) such that `h • L` approximates well `f (x + h)`
(up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) : Set ℝ :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem A_mem_nhdsGT {L : F} {r ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) : A f L r ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', rr', hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between rr'.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le rr'.2)⟩
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT <| show x < x + r' - s by linarith] with x' hx'
use s, this
have A : Icc x' (x' + s) ⊆ Icc x (x + r') := by
apply Icc_subset_Icc hx'.1.le
linarith [hx'.2]
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (A hy) z (A hz)
theorem B_mem_nhdsGT {K : Set F} {r s ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ B f K r s ε) :
B f K r s ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
obtain ⟨L, LK, hL₁, hL₂⟩ : ∃ L : F, L ∈ K ∧ x ∈ A f L r ε ∧ x ∈ A f L s ε := by
simpa only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop] using hx
filter_upwards [A_mem_nhdsGT hL₁, A_mem_nhdsGT hL₂] with y hy₁ hy₂
simp only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨L, LK, hy₁, hy₂⟩
theorem measurableSet_B {K : Set F} {r s ε : ℝ} : MeasurableSet (B f K r s ε) :=
.of_mem_nhdsGT fun _ hx => B_mem_nhdsGT hx
theorem A_mono (L : F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [hy.1, hy.2, r'r.2]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : F} {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : ℝ}
(hy : y ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
have A : x + r / 2 ≤ x + r' := by linarith [r'mem.1]
exact hr' _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hy) _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hz)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : ℝ}
(hx : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (derivWithin f (Ici x) x) r ε := by
have := hx.hasDerivWithinAt
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff] at this
rcases mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset.1 (this (half_pos hε)) with ⟨m, xm, hm⟩
refine ⟨m - x, by linarith [show x < m from xm], fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨half_lt_self hr.1, le_rfl⟩
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ =
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x -
(f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x)‖ := by
congr 1; simp only [sub_smul]; abel
_ ≤
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ +
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ :=
(norm_sub_le _ _)
_ ≤ ε / 2 * ‖z - x‖ + ε / 2 * ‖y - x‖ :=
(add_le_add (hm ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩)
(hm ⟨hy.1, hy.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩))
_ ≤ ε / 2 * r + ε / 2 * r := by
gcongr
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hz.1, hz.2]
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hy.1, hy.2]
_ = ε * r := by ring
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {r x : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ε : ℝ) {L₁ L₂ : F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε)
(h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ε := by
suffices H : ‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ ≤ r / 2 * (4 * ε) by
rwa [norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (half_pos hr).le, mul_le_mul_left (half_pos hr)] at H
calc
‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ =
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂ -
(f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁)‖ := by
simp [smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂‖ +
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
_ = r / 2 * (4 * ε) := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := pow_pos (by norm_num) _
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨derivWithin f (Ici x) x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q → n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
(le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) (add_le_add_right (norm_add_le _ _) _))
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 12 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * (ε / 12) := mul_lt_mul' le_rfl he (le_of_lt P) (by norm_num)
_ = ε := by field_simp [(by norm_num : (12 : ℝ) ≠ 0)]
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has right derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
simp only [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole interval of length `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 16 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
filter_upwards [Icc_mem_nhdsGE <| show x < x + (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) by simp] with y hy
-- We need to show that `f y - f x - f' (y - x)` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y - x‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hy.1 with (rfl | xy)
· simp only [sub_self, zero_smul, norm_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
have yzero : 0 < y - x := sub_pos.2 xy
have y_le : y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by linarith [hy.2]
have yone : y - x ≤ 1 := le_trans y_le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < y - x ∧ y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y - x` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_of_lt_of_le hk y_le
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J : ‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ :=
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [one_div, inv_pow, left_mem_Icc, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
positivity
· simp only [pow_add, tsub_le_iff_left] at h'k
simpa only [hy.1, mem_Icc, true_and, one_div, pow_one] using h'k
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (y - x) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ := by rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg yzero.le]
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • f'‖ =
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m + (y - x) • (L e (n e) m - f')‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub, sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ + ‖y - x‖ * (12 * (1 / 2) ^ e) :=
norm_add_le_of_le J <| by rw [norm_smul]; gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (ε / 16) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
rw [← this.derivWithin (uniqueDiffOn_Ici x x Set.left_mem_Ici)] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableWithinAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end RightDerivMeasurableAux
open RightDerivMeasurableAux
variable (f)
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete
set, is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_d K hK, D, measurableSet_b, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact measurableSet_B
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set F) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_derivWithin_Ici [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] :
Measurable fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
(fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } ∩ { _x | (0 : F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans derivWithin_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
theorem stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici :
StronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) := by
borelize F
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨measurable_derivWithin_Ici f, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_count, ht⟩ : ∃ t : Set ℝ, t.Countable ∧ Dense t := exists_countable_dense ℝ
suffices H : range (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
IsSeparable.mono (t_count.image f).isSeparable.span.closure H
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
suffices H' : range (fun y ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) y) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
H' (mem_range_self _)
apply range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
calc Ici x
= closure (Ioi x ∩ closure t) := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq.1 ht]
_ ⊆ closure (closure (Ioi x ∩ t)) := by
apply closure_mono
simpa [inter_comm] using (isOpen_Ioi (a := x)).closure_inter (s := t)
_ ⊆ closure (Ici x ∩ t) := by
rw [closure_closure]
exact closure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ Ioi_subset_Ici_self)
theorem aemeasurable_derivWithin_Ici [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) μ :=
(measurable_derivWithin_Ici f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici f).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ioi :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x } := by
simpa [differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici] using measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici f
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_derivWithin_Ioi [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] :
Measurable fun x => derivWithin f (Ioi x) x := by
simpa [derivWithin_Ioi_eq_Ici] using measurable_derivWithin_Ici f
theorem stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ioi :
StronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) := by
simpa [derivWithin_Ioi_eq_Ici] using stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici f
theorem aemeasurable_derivWithin_Ioi [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) μ :=
(measurable_derivWithin_Ioi f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ioi (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ioi f).aestronglyMeasurable
end RightDeriv
section WithParam
/- In this section, we prove the measurability of the derivative in a context with parameters:
given `f : α → E → F`, we want to show that `p ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2` is measurable. Contrary
to the previous sections, some assumptions are needed for this: if `f p.1` depends arbitrarily on
`p.1`, this is obviously false. We require that `f` is continuous and `E` is locally compact --
then the proofs in the previous sections adapt readily, as the set `A` defined above is open, so
that the differentiability set `D` is measurable. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [LocallyCompactSpace E]
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{f : α → E → F}
namespace FDerivMeasurableAux
open Uniformity
lemma isOpen_A_with_param {r s : ℝ} (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) (L : E →L[𝕜] F) :
IsOpen {p : α × E | p.2 ∈ A (f p.1) L r s} := by
have : ProperSpace E := .of_locallyCompactSpace 𝕜
simp only [A, half_lt_self_iff, not_lt, mem_Ioc, mem_ball, map_sub, mem_setOf_eq]
apply isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2
rintro ⟨a, x⟩ ⟨r', ⟨Irr', Ir'r⟩, hr⟩
have ha : Continuous (f a) := hf.uncurry_left a
rcases exists_between Irr' with ⟨t, hrt, htr'⟩
rcases exists_between hrt with ⟨t', hrt', ht't⟩
obtain ⟨b, b_lt, hb⟩ : ∃ b, b < s * r ∧ ∀ y ∈ closedBall x t, ∀ z ∈ closedBall x t,
‖f a z - f a y - (L z - L y)‖ ≤ b := by
have B : Continuous (fun (p : E × E) ↦ ‖f a p.2 - f a p.1 - (L p.2 - L p.1)‖) := by fun_prop
have C : (closedBall x t ×ˢ closedBall x t).Nonempty := by simp; linarith
rcases ((isCompact_closedBall x t).prod (isCompact_closedBall x t)).exists_isMaxOn
C B.continuousOn with ⟨p, pt, hp⟩
simp only [mem_prod, mem_closedBall] at pt
refine ⟨‖f a p.2 - f a p.1 - (L p.2 - L p.1)‖,
hr p.1 (pt.1.trans_lt htr') p.2 (pt.2.trans_lt htr'), fun y hy z hz ↦ ?_⟩
have D : (y, z) ∈ closedBall x t ×ˢ closedBall x t := mem_prod.2 ⟨hy, hz⟩
exact hp D
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε, 0 < ε ∧ b + 2 * ε < s * r :=
⟨(s * r - b) / 3, by linarith, by linarith⟩
obtain ⟨u, u_open, au, hu⟩ : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ ∀ (p : α × E),
p.1 ∈ u → p.2 ∈ closedBall x t → dist (f.uncurry p) (f.uncurry (a, p.2)) < ε := by
have C : Continuous (fun (p : α × E) ↦ f a p.2) := by fun_prop
have D : ({a} ×ˢ closedBall x t).EqOn f.uncurry (fun p ↦ f a p.2) := by
rintro ⟨b, y⟩ ⟨hb, -⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff] at hb
simp [hb]
obtain ⟨v, v_open, sub_v, hv⟩ : ∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ {a} ×ˢ closedBall x t ⊆ v ∧
∀ p ∈ v, dist (Function.uncurry f p) (f a p.2) < ε :=
Uniform.exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq (s := {a} ×ˢ closedBall x t)
(fun p _ ↦ hf.continuousAt) (fun p _ ↦ C.continuousAt) D (dist_mem_uniformity εpos)
obtain ⟨w, w', w_open, -, sub_w, sub_w', hww'⟩ : ∃ (w : Set α) (w' : Set E),
IsOpen w ∧ IsOpen w' ∧ {a} ⊆ w ∧ closedBall x t ⊆ w' ∧ w ×ˢ w' ⊆ v :=
generalized_tube_lemma isCompact_singleton (isCompact_closedBall x t) v_open sub_v
refine ⟨w, w_open, sub_w rfl, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨b, y⟩ h hby
exact hv _ (hww' ⟨h, sub_w' hby⟩)
have : u ×ˢ ball x (t - t') ∈ 𝓝 (a, x) :=
prod_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds au) (ball_mem_nhds _ (sub_pos.2 ht't))
filter_upwards [this]
rintro ⟨a', x'⟩ ha'x'
simp only [mem_prod, mem_ball] at ha'x'
refine ⟨t', ⟨hrt', ht't.le.trans (htr'.le.trans Ir'r)⟩, fun y hy z hz ↦ ?_⟩
have dyx : dist y x ≤ t := by linarith [dist_triangle y x' x]
have dzx : dist z x ≤ t := by linarith [dist_triangle z x' x]
calc
‖f a' z - f a' y - (L z - L y)‖ =
‖(f a' z - f a z) + (f a y - f a' y) + (f a z - f a y - (L z - L y))‖ := by congr; abel
_ ≤ ‖f a' z - f a z‖ + ‖f a y - f a' y‖ + ‖f a z - f a y - (L z - L y)‖ := norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ ε + ε + b := by
gcongr
· rw [← dist_eq_norm]
change dist (f.uncurry (a', z)) (f.uncurry (a, z)) ≤ ε
apply (hu _ _ _).le
· exact ha'x'.1
· simp [dzx]
· rw [← dist_eq_norm']
change dist (f.uncurry (a', y)) (f.uncurry (a, y)) ≤ ε
apply (hu _ _ _).le
· exact ha'x'.1
· simp [dyx]
· simp [hb, dyx, dzx]
_ < s * r := by linarith
lemma isOpen_B_with_param {r s t : ℝ} (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) :
IsOpen {p : α × E | p.2 ∈ B (f p.1) K r s t} := by
suffices H : IsOpen (⋃ L ∈ K,
{p : α × E | p.2 ∈ A (f p.1) L r t ∧ p.2 ∈ A (f p.1) L s t}) by
convert H; ext p; simp [B]
refine isOpen_biUnion (fun L _ ↦ ?_)
exact (isOpen_A_with_param hf L).inter (isOpen_A_with_param hf L)
end FDerivMeasurableAux
open FDerivMeasurableAux
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete_with_param
(hf : Continuous f.uncurry) {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet {p : α × E | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∧ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∈ K} := by
have : {p : α × E | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∧ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∈ K}
= {p : α × E | p.2 ∈ D (f p.1) K} := by simp [← differentiable_set_eq_D K hK]
rw [this]
simp only [D, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion]
simp only [setOf_forall, setOf_exists]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion (fun _ ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
have : ProperSpace E := .of_locallyCompactSpace 𝕜
exact (isOpen_B_with_param hf K).measurableSet
variable (𝕜)
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of differentiability points of a continuous function depending on a parameter taking
values in a complete space is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_with_param (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) :
MeasurableSet {p : α × E | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2} := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete_with_param hf this
simp
theorem measurable_fderiv_with_param (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2) := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
have :
(fun (p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2) ⁻¹' s =
{p | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∧ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 ∈ s } ∪
{ p | ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2} ∩ { _p | (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s} :=
Set.ext (fun x ↦ mem_preimage.trans fderiv_mem_iff)
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete_with_param hf hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_with_param _ hf).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
theorem measurable_fderiv_apply_const_with_param [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F]
(hf : Continuous f.uncurry) (y : E) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2 y) :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.measurable_apply y).comp (measurable_fderiv_with_param 𝕜 hf)
variable {𝕜}
theorem measurable_deriv_with_param [LocallyCompactSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] {f : α → 𝕜 → F} (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) :
| Measurable (fun (p : α × 𝕜) ↦ deriv (f p.1) p.2) := by
simpa only [fderiv_deriv] using measurable_fderiv_apply_const_with_param 𝕜 hf 1
theorem stronglyMeasurable_deriv_with_param [LocallyCompactSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α F]
{f : α → 𝕜 → F} (hf : Continuous f.uncurry) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun (p : α × 𝕜) ↦ deriv (f p.1) p.2) := by
borelize F
rcases h.out with hα|hF
· have : ProperSpace 𝕜 := .of_locallyCompactSpace 𝕜
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨measurable_deriv_with_param hf, ?_⟩
have : range (fun (p : α × 𝕜) ↦ deriv (f p.1) p.2)
⊆ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (range f.uncurry)) := by
rintro - ⟨p, rfl⟩
have A : deriv (f p.1) p.2 ∈ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (range (f p.1))) := by
rw [← image_univ]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Measurable.lean | 924 | 939 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Conditions for rank to be finite
Also contains characterization for when rank equals zero or rank equals one.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {ι : Type w}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁]
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
open Basis Cardinal Function Module Set Submodule
/-- If every finite set of linearly independent vectors has cardinality at most `n`,
then the same is true for arbitrary sets of linearly independent vectors.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
∀ s : Set M, LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) → #s ≤ n := by
intro s li
apply Cardinal.card_le_of
intro t
rw [← Finset.card_map (Embedding.subtype s)]
apply H
apply linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype _ li
theorem rank_le {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
Module.rank R M ≤ n := by
rw [Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
exact linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded H _ li
section RankZero
/-- See `rank_zero_iff` for a stronger version with `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_zero_iff :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • x = 0 := by
nontriviality R
constructor
· contrapose!
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
have : LinearIndependent R (fun _ : Unit ↦ x) :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr (fun l hl ↦ Finsupp.unique_ext <| not_not.mp fun H ↦
hx _ H ((Finsupp.linearCombination_unique _ _ _).symm.trans hl))
simpa using this.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· intro h
rw [← le_zero_iff, Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
intro ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff]
rintro ⟨i : s⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := h i
apply ha
simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (linearIndependent_iff.mp hs (Finsupp.single i a) (by simpa)) i
theorem rank_pos_of_free [Module.Free R M] [Nontrivial M] :
0 < Module.rank R M :=
have := Module.nontrivial R M
(pos_of_ne_zero <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _).trans_le
(Free.chooseBasis R M).linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank
variable [Nontrivial R]
section
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
theorem rank_zero_iff_forall_zero :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, x = 0 := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_zero_iff, smul_eq_zero, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, false_or,
exists_and_right, and_iff_right (exists_ne (0 : R))]
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` for the reason that `Nontrivial R` is needed.
Also see `rank_eq_zero_iff` for the version without `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
theorem rank_zero_iff : Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M :=
rank_zero_iff_forall_zero.trans (subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).symm
theorem rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ x : M, x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simpa using rank_zero_iff_forall_zero
theorem rank_pos_iff_nontrivial : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ Nontrivial M :=
rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero.trans (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne 0).symm
theorem rank_pos [Nontrivial M] : 0 < Module.rank R M :=
rank_pos_iff_nontrivial.mpr ‹_›
end
variable (R M)
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` that assumes `Subsingleton R` instead. -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem rank_subsingleton' [Subsingleton M] : Module.rank R M = 0 :=
rank_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun _ ↦ ⟨1, one_ne_zero, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rank_punit : Module.rank R PUnit = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
@[simp]
theorem rank_bot : Module.rank R (⊥ : Submodule R M) = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
variable {R M}
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos {s : Submodule R M} (h : 0 < Module.rank R s) :
∃ b : M, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot fun eq => by rw [eq, rank_bot] at h; exact lt_irrefl _ h
end RankZero
section Finite
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat [Module.Free R M] {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M = n) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨⟨ι, b⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
have := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.mp <|
b.linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank |>.trans_eq h |>.trans_lt <| nat_lt_aleph0 n
exact Module.Finite.of_basis b
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(h : Module.rank R M = 0) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
rw [rank_zero_iff] at h
infer_instance
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_one [Module.Free R M] (h : Module.rank R M = 1) :
Module.Finite R M :=
Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat <| h.trans Nat.cast_one.symm
section
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem Basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Nonempty (Fintype ι) := by
rwa [← Cardinal.lift_lt, ← b.mk_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_lt_aleph0,
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_fintype] at h
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
noncomputable def Basis.fintypeIndexOfRankLtAleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Fintype ι :=
Classical.choice (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite set. -/
theorem Basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (b : Basis s R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : s.Finite :=
finite_def.2 (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
theorem cardinalMk_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type w} {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) : #ι ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← lift_le.{max v w}]
simpa only [← finrank_eq_rank, lift_natCast, lift_le_nat_iff] using h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
| @[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")] alias cardinal_mk_le_finrank := cardinalMk_le_finrank
theorem fintype_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ finrank R M := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Finite.lean | 179 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
| {pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 706 | 714 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
end Distrib
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddMonoid` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using already-proved extensionality lemmas.
congr; ext : 1; assumption
theorem toDistrib_injective : Function.Injective (@toDistrib R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalSemiring
/-! ### NonAssocSemiring and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddMonoidWithOne`, `AddCommMonoidWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas.
-/
/- TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
namespace NonAssocSemiring
/- The best place to prove that the `NatCast` is determined by the other operations is probably in
an extensionality lemma for `AddMonoidWithOne`, in which case we may as well do the typeclasses
defined in `Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean` as well. -/
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h_zero : (inst₁.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero = (inst₂.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero :=
congrArg (fun inst => (inst.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero) h
have h_one' : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne :=
congrArg (@MulOneClass.toOne R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_mul
have h_one : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one :=
congrArg (@One.one R) h_one'
have : inst₁.toAddCommMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommMonoidWithOne := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast :=
congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
-- Split into `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `One` and `natCast` instances.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddCommGroup` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
congr; (ext : 1; assumption)
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
-- Use above extensionality lemma to prove injectivity by showing that `h_add` and `h_mul` hold.
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-! ### NonUnitalRing -/
namespace NonUnitalRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonUnitalRing
/-! ### NonAssocRing and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddGroupWithOne`, `AddCommGroupWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddCommGroup = inst₂.toAddCommGroup :=
AddCommGroup.ext h_add
have : inst₁.toAddGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddGroupWithOne :=
AddGroupWithOne.ext h_add h_one
injection this with _ h_addMonoidWithOne; injection h_addMonoidWithOne
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
namespace NonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Mathematically non-trivial fact: `intCast` is determined by the rest.
have h₃ : inst₁.toAddCommGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommGroupWithOne :=
AddCommGroupWithOne.ext h_add (congrArg (·.toOne.one) h₂)
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
| Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocRing
/-! ### Semiring -/
namespace Semiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Semiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 266 | 276 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
/-- The directed sUnion of a set S of preconnected subsets is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
/-- Preconnectedness of the iUnion of a family of preconnected sets
indexed by the vertices of a preconnected graph,
where two vertices are joined when the corresponding sets intersect. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
section SuccOrder
open Order
variable [LinearOrder β] [SuccOrder β] [IsSuccArchimedean β]
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is connected. -/
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_chain [Nonempty β] {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of preconnected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (ht : OrdConnected t)
(H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
have h1 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj (Ico_subset_Icc_self hk)
have h2 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → succ k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj ⟨hk.1.trans <| le_succ _, succ_le_of_lt hk.2⟩
have h3 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → (s k ∩ s (succ k)).Nonempty :=
fun hi hj hk => K _ (h1 hi hj hk) (h2 hi hj hk)
refine IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun i hi j hj => ?_
exact reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun k hk => ⟨h3 hi hj hk, h1 hi hj hk⟩) fun k hk =>
⟨by rw [inter_comm]; exact h3 hj hi hk, h2 hj hi hk⟩
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (hnt : t.Nonempty)
(ht : OrdConnected t) (H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨hnt.some, hnt.some_mem, (H _ hnt.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain ht (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
end SuccOrder
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a preconnected set and its closure, then it is
preconnected as well. See also `IsConnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a connected set and its closure, then it is
connected as well. See also `IsPreconnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
/-- The closure of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
/-- The closure of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
/-- The image of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
/-- The image of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPreconnected_image := IsInducing.isPreconnected_image
/- TODO: The following lemmas about connection of preimages hold more generally for strict maps
(the quotient and subspace topologies of the image agree) whose fibers are preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) := fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f)
(hsf : s ⊆ range f) : IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2 fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_or_subset (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v) (huv : Disjoint u v)
(hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hs : IsPreconnected s) : s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v := by
specialize hs u v hu hv hsuv
obtain hsu | hsu := (s ∩ u).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Or.inr ((Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.2 hsu).subset_right_of_subset_union hsuv)
· replace hs := mt (hs hsu)
simp_rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 huv] at hs
exact Or.inl ((hs s.disjoint_empty).subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_left_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsu : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ u :=
Disjoint.subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv
(by
by_contra hsv
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] at hsv
obtain ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := hs u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 huv hx)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_right_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsv : (s ∩ v).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ v :=
hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hv hu huv.symm (union_comm u v ▸ hsuv) hsv
/-- If a preconnected set `s` intersects an open set `u`, and limit points of `u` inside `s` are
contained in `u`, then the whole set `s` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_of_closure_inter_subset (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hu : IsOpen u)
(h'u : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (h : closure u ∩ s ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u := by
have A : s ⊆ u ∪ (closure u)ᶜ := by
intro x hx
by_cases xu : x ∈ u
· exact Or.inl xu
· right
intro h'x
exact xu (h (mem_inter h'x hx))
apply hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hu isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl _ A h'u
exact disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure)
theorem IsPreconnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ×ˢ t) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Prod.mk a₁ '' t ∪ flip Prod.mk b₂ '' s, ?_, .inl ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩, .inr ⟨a₂, ha₂, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro _ (⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ | ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨ha₁, hy⟩, ⟨hx, hb₂⟩]
· exact (ht.image _ (by fun_prop)).union (a₁, b₂) ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩
⟨a₁, ha₁, rfl⟩ (hs.image _ (Continuous.prodMk_left _).continuousOn)
theorem IsConnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
(ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ×ˢ t) :=
⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
theorem isPreconnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)}
(hs : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (pi univ s) := by
rintro u v uo vo hsuv ⟨f, hfs, hfu⟩ ⟨g, hgs, hgv⟩
classical
rcases exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds hfu) g with ⟨I, hI⟩
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty =>
refine ⟨g, hgs, ⟨?_, hgv⟩⟩
simpa using hI
| insert i I _ ihI =>
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert] at hI
have := I.piecewise_mem_set_pi hfs hgs
refine (hsuv this).elim ihI fun h => ?_
set S := update (I.piecewise f g) i '' s i
have hsub : S ⊆ pi univ s := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun z hz => ?_
rwa [update_preimage_univ_pi]
exact fun j _ => this j trivial
have hconn : IsPreconnected S :=
(hs i).image _ (continuous_const.update i continuous_id).continuousOn
have hSu : (S ∩ u).Nonempty := ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (hfs _ trivial), hI⟩
have hSv : (S ∩ v).Nonempty := ⟨_, ⟨_, this _ trivial, update_eq_self _ _⟩, h⟩
refine (hconn u v uo vo (hsub.trans hsuv) hSu hSv).mono ?_
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hsub
@[simp]
theorem isConnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
IsConnected (pi univ s) ↔ ∀ i, IsConnected (s i) := by
simp only [IsConnected, ← univ_pi_nonempty_iff, forall_and, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun hne => ⟨fun hc i => ?_, isPreconnected_univ_pi⟩
rw [← eval_image_univ_pi hne]
exact hc.image _ (continuous_apply _).continuousOn
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connectedComponent (x : α) : Set α :=
⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsPreconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
open Classical in
/-- Given a set `F` in a topological space `α` and a point `x : α`, the connected
component of `x` in `F` is the connected component of `x` in the subtype `F` seen as
a set in `α`. This definition does not make sense if `x` is not in `F` so we return the
empty set in this case. -/
def connectedComponentIn (F : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
if h : x ∈ F then (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) else ∅
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_image {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) :=
dif_pos h
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_empty {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = ∅ :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_connectedComponent {x : α} : x ∈ connectedComponent x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨isPreconnected_singleton, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem mem_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hx : x ∈ F) :
x ∈ connectedComponentIn F x := by
simp [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, mem_connectedComponent, hx]
theorem connectedComponent_nonempty {x : α} : (connectedComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
(connectedComponentIn F x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp [connectedComponent_nonempty, *]
theorem connectedComponentIn_subset (F : Set α) (x : α) : connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsPreconnected (connectedComponent x) :=
isPreconnected_sUnion x _ (fun _ => And.right) fun _ => And.left
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsPreconnected (connectedComponentIn F x) := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]; split_ifs
· exact IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mpr isPreconnected_connectedComponent
· exact isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsConnected (connectedComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩, isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
theorem isConnected_connectedComponentIn_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsConnected (connectedComponentIn F x) ↔ x ∈ F := by
simp_rw [← connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff, IsConnected, isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn,
and_true]
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsPreconnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x := fun _z hz => mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ connectedComponentIn F x := by
have : IsPreconnected (((↑) : F → α) ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mp ?_
rwa [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
have h2xs : (⟨x, hsF hxs⟩ : F) ∈ (↑) ⁻¹' s := by
rw [mem_preimage]
exact hxs
have := this.subset_connectedComponent h2xs
rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image (hsF hxs)]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset _ this)
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
theorem IsConnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsConnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
H1.2.subset_connectedComponent H2
theorem IsPreconnected.connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected F)
(hx : x ∈ F) : connectedComponentIn F x = F :=
(connectedComponentIn_subset F x).antisymm (h.subset_connectedComponentIn hx subset_rfl)
theorem connectedComponent_eq {x y : α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponent x) :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent
(Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset mem_connectedComponent
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)))
theorem connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem {x y : α} :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y ↔ x ∈ connectedComponent y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_connectedComponent, fun h => (connectedComponent_eq h).symm⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq {x y : α} {F : Set α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponentIn F x) :
connectedComponentIn F x = connectedComponentIn F y := by
have hx : x ∈ F := connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff.mp ⟨y, h⟩
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, h2y, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hy, connectedComponent_eq h2y]
theorem connectedComponentIn_univ (x : α) : connectedComponentIn univ x = connectedComponent x :=
subset_antisymm
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.subset_connectedComponent <|
mem_connectedComponentIn trivial)
(isPreconnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponentIn mem_connectedComponent <|
subset_univ _)
theorem connectedComponent_disjoint {x y : α} (h : connectedComponent x ≠ connectedComponent y) :
Disjoint (connectedComponent x) (connectedComponent y) :=
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 =>
h ((connectedComponent_eq h1).trans (connectedComponent_eq h2).symm)
theorem isClosed_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsClosed (connectedComponent x) :=
closure_subset_iff_isClosed.1 <|
isConnected_connectedComponent.closure.subset_connectedComponent <|
subset_closure mem_connectedComponent
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) (a : α) : f '' connectedComponent a ⊆ connectedComponent (f a) :=
(isConnected_connectedComponent.image f h.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponent
((mem_image f (connectedComponent a) (f a)).2 ⟨a, mem_connectedComponent, rfl⟩)
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponentIn_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
{a : α} (hf : Continuous f) (hx : a ∈ s) :
f '' connectedComponentIn s a ⊆ connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a) :=
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.image _ hf.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponentIn
(mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_connectedComponentIn hx)
(image_subset _ <| connectedComponentIn_subset _ _)
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponent [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f)
(a : α) : MapsTo f (connectedComponent a) (connectedComponent (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| h.image_connectedComponent_subset a
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponentIn [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : Continuous f) {a : α} (hx : a ∈ s) :
MapsTo f (connectedComponentIn s a) (connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| image_connectedComponentIn_subset h hx
theorem irreducibleComponent_subset_connectedComponent {x : α} :
irreducibleComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent.isConnected.subset_connectedComponent mem_irreducibleComponent
@[mono]
theorem connectedComponentIn_mono (x : α) {F G : Set α} (h : F ⊆ G) :
connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ connectedComponentIn G x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ F
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, connectedComponentIn_eq_image (h hx), ←
show ((↑) : G → α) ∘ inclusion h = (↑) from rfl, image_comp]
exact image_subset _ ((continuous_inclusion h).image_connectedComponent_subset ⟨x, hx⟩)
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_empty hx]
exact Set.empty_subset _
/-- A preconnected space is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class PreconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The universal set `Set.univ` in a preconnected space is a preconnected set. -/
isPreconnected_univ : IsPreconnected (univ : Set α)
export PreconnectedSpace (isPreconnected_univ)
/-- A connected space is a nonempty one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class ConnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop extends PreconnectedSpace α where
/-- A connected space is nonempty. -/
toNonempty : Nonempty α
attribute [instance 50] ConnectedSpace.toNonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
theorem isConnected_univ [ConnectedSpace α] : IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨univ_nonempty, isPreconnected_univ⟩
lemma preconnectedSpace_iff_univ : PreconnectedSpace α ↔ IsPreconnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma connectedSpace_iff_univ : ConnectedSpace α ↔ IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨univ_nonempty, h.1.1⟩,
fun h ↦ ConnectedSpace.mk (toPreconnectedSpace := ⟨h.2⟩) ⟨h.1.some⟩⟩
theorem isPreconnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) : IsPreconnected (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ isPreconnected_univ.image _ h.continuousOn
theorem isConnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f) :
IsConnected (range f) :=
⟨range_nonempty f, isPreconnected_range h⟩
theorem Function.Surjective.connectedSpace [ConnectedSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : ConnectedSpace β := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instConnectedSpace {s : Setoid α} [ConnectedSpace α] :
ConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.connectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem DenseRange.preconnectedSpace [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(hf : DenseRange f) (hc : Continuous f) : PreconnectedSpace β :=
⟨hf.closure_eq ▸ (isPreconnected_range hc).closure⟩
theorem connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
ConnectedSpace α ↔ ∃ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
exact
⟨x, eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, h⟩
haveI : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨by rw [← h]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
exact ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
theorem preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
PreconnectedSpace α ↔ ∀ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· intro h x
exact eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)
· intro h
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· exact ⟨by rw [univ_eq_empty_iff.mpr hα]; exact isPreconnected_empty⟩
· exact ⟨by rw [← h (Classical.choice hα)]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
@[simp]
theorem PreconnectedSpace.connectedComponent_eq_univ {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[h : PreconnectedSpace X] (x : X) : connectedComponent x = univ :=
preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent.mp h x
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] [PreconnectedSpace β] :
PreconnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨by
rw [← univ_prod_univ]
exact isPreconnected_univ.prod isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] [ConnectedSpace β] : ConnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, PreconnectedSpace (π i)] :
PreconnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨by rw [← pi_univ univ]; exact isPreconnected_univ_pi fun i => isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, ConnectedSpace (π i)] : ConnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PreirreducibleSpace.preconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[PreirreducibleSpace α] : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨isPreirreducible_univ.isPreconnected⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IrreducibleSpace.connectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[IrreducibleSpace α] : ConnectedSpace α where toNonempty := IrreducibleSpace.toNonempty
theorem Subtype.preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : PreconnectedSpace s where
isPreconnected_univ := by
rwa [← IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image, image_univ, Subtype.range_val]
theorem Subtype.connectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : ConnectedSpace s where
toPreconnectedSpace := Subtype.preconnectedSpace h.isPreconnected
toNonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype
theorem isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ PreconnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.preconnectedSpace, fun h => by
simpa using isPreconnected_univ.image ((↑) : s → α) continuous_subtype_val.continuousOn⟩
theorem isConnected_iff_connectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsConnected s ↔ ConnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.connectedSpace, fun h =>
⟨nonempty_subtype.mp h.2, isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace.mpr h.1⟩⟩
end Preconnected
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 735 | 742 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
/-- `p ∧ q` occurs frequently along the product of two filters
iff both `p` and `q` occur frequently along the corresponding filters. -/
theorem frequently_prod_and {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x.1 ∧ q x.2) ↔ (∃ᶠ a in f, p a) ∧ ∃ᶠ b in g, q b := by
simp only [frequently_iff_neBot, ← prod_neBot, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
rfl
theorem tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (x ×ˢ y) z ↔ ∀ W ∈ z, ∃ U ∈ x, ∃ V ∈ y, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop]
theorem tendsto_prod_iff' {g' : Filter γ} {s : α → β × γ} :
Tendsto s f (g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).1) f g ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).2) f g' := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, tendsto_inf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem le_prod {f : Filter (α × β)} {g : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
(f ≤ g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto Prod.fst f g ∧ Tendsto Prod.snd f g' :=
tendsto_prod_iff'
end Prod
/-! ### Coproducts of filters -/
section Coprod
variable {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.coprod f g = f ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g := by
rw [prod_top, top_prod]
rfl
theorem mem_coprod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
| s ∈ f.coprod g ↔ (∃ t₁ ∈ f, Prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ t₂ ∈ g, Prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 441 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ￢a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ￢a ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem hnot_bot : ￢(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_top : ￢(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
theorem hnot_hnot_le : ￢￢a ≤ a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
theorem hnot_anti : Antitone (hnot : α → α) := fun _ _ h => hnot_le_comm.1 <| hnot_hnot_le.trans h
theorem hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ￢b ≤ ￢a :=
hnot_anti h
@[simp]
theorem hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ￢￢￢a = ￢a :=
hnot_hnot_le.antisymm <| hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : Codisjoint (￢￢a) b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_right_iff : Codisjoint a (￢￢b) ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, hnot_hnot_hnot]
theorem le_hnot_inf_hnot : ￢(a ⊔ b) ≤ ￢a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf (hnot_anti le_sup_left) <| hnot_anti le_sup_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sup_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a ⊔ b) = ￢￢a ⊔ ￢￢b := by
refine ((hnot_inf_distrib _ _).ge.trans <| hnot_anti le_hnot_inf_hnot).antisymm' ?_
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_assoc, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff,
codisjoint_left_comm, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff, ← codisjoint_assoc, sup_comm]
exact codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sdiff_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a \ b) = ￢￢a \ ￢￢b := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine hnot_le_comm.1 ((hnot_anti sdiff_le_inf_hnot).trans' ?_)
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, codisjoint_left_comm, ←
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right]
exact le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sdiff_le_iff, ← hnot_hnot_sup_distrib]
exact hnot_anti (hnot_anti le_sup_sdiff)
instance OrderDual.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
compl := toDual ∘ hnot ∘ ofDual
himp a b := toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
himp_bot := @top_sdiff' α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_compl (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual aᶜ = ￢ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_himp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇨ b) = ofDual b \ ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_hnot (a : α) : toDual (￢a) = (toDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sdiff (a b : α) : toDual (a \ b) = toDual b ⇨ toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instCoheytingAlgebra [CoheytingAlgebra β] : CoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨top_sdiff' a.1, top_sdiff' a.2⟩
instance Pi.instCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CoheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
CoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
top_sdiff f := funext fun i ↦ top_sdiff' (f i)
end CoheytingAlgebra
section BiheytingAlgebra
variable [BiheytingAlgebra α] {a : α}
theorem compl_le_hnot : aᶜ ≤ ￢a :=
(disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint _ a).le_of_codisjoint codisjoint_hnot_right
end BiheytingAlgebra
/-- Propositions form a Heyting algebra with implication as Heyting implication and negation as
complement. -/
instance Prop.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra Prop :=
{ Prop.instDistribLattice, Prop.instBoundedOrder with
himp := (· → ·),
le_himp_iff := fun _ _ _ => and_imp.symm, himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem himp_iff_imp (p q : Prop) : p ⇨ q ↔ p → q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem compl_iff_not (p : Prop) : pᶜ ↔ ¬p :=
Iff.rfl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A bounded linear order is a bi-Heyting algebra by setting
* `a ⇨ b = ⊤` if `a ≤ b` and `a ⇨ b = b` otherwise.
* `a \ b = ⊥` if `a ≤ b` and `a \ b = a` otherwise. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra [LinearOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : BiheytingAlgebra α :=
{ LinearOrder.toLattice, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊤ else b,
compl := fun a => if a = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true le_top (inf_le_of_right_le h)
· rw [inf_le_iff, or_iff_left h],
himp_bot := fun _ => if_congr le_bot_iff rfl rfl, sdiff := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊥ else a,
hnot := fun a => if a = ⊤ then ⊥ else ⊤,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true bot_le (le_sup_of_le_left h)
· rw [le_sup_iff, or_iff_right h],
top_sdiff := fun _ => if_congr top_le_iff rfl rfl }
instance OrderDual.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] : BiheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Prod.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] :
BiheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instBiheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, BiheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
BiheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedHeytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α]
[HImp α] [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Top α›
__ := ‹HImp α›
le_top := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_top]
exact le_top,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_himp, map_inf, le_himp_iff] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Bot α]
[SDiff α] [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Bot α›
__ := ‹SDiff α›
bot_le := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_bot]
exact bot_le,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_sdiff, map_sup, sdiff_le_iff] }
|
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 1,019 | 1,020 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Altitude
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Circumcenter
/-!
# Monge point and orthocenter
This file defines the orthocenter of a triangle, via its n-dimensional
generalization, the Monge point of a simplex.
## Main definitions
* `mongePoint` is the Monge point of a simplex, defined in terms of
its position on the Euler line and then shown to be the point of
concurrence of the Monge planes.
* `mongePlane` is a Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex, which is the
(n+1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an n-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude).
* `orthocenter` is defined, for the case of a triangle, to be the same
as its Monge point, then shown to be the point of concurrence of the
altitudes.
* `OrthocentricSystem` is a predicate on sets of points that says
whether they are four points, one of which is the orthocenter of the
other three (in which case various other properties hold, including
that each is the orthocenter of the other three).
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monge_point>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthocentric_system>
* Małgorzata Buba-Brzozowa, [The Monge Point and the 3(n+1) Point
Sphere of an
n-Simplex](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f8b/0f623459c76dac2e49255737f8f0f4725d16.pdf)
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The Monge point of a simplex (in 2 or more dimensions) is a
generalization of the orthocenter of a triangle. It is defined to be
the intersection of the Monge planes, where a Monge plane is the
(n-1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an (n-2)-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude). The circumcenter O, centroid G and Monge point
M are collinear in that order on the Euler line, with OG : GM = (n-1): 2.
Here, we use that ratio to define the Monge point (so resulting
in a point that equals the centroid in 0 or 1 dimensions), and then
show in subsequent lemmas that the point so defined lies in the Monge
planes and is their unique point of intersection. -/
def mongePoint {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter
/-- The position of the Monge point in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint =
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The Monge point lies in the affine span. -/
theorem mongePoint_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ (centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (card_fin (n + 1)))
s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same Monge point. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.mongePoint = s₂.mongePoint := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter, centroid_eq_of_range_eq h,
circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq h]
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
/-- `mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_const, card_fin,
nsmul_eq_mul]
field_simp
ring
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) :
s.mongePoint =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).affineCombination ℝ
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
← LinearMap.map_smul, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination]
congr with i
rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Pi.sub_apply]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := n.cast_add_one_ne_zero
cases i <;>
simp_rw [centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter] <;>
rw [add_tsub_assoc_of_le (by decide : 1 ≤ 2), (by decide : 2 - 1 = 1)]
· rw [if_pos (mem_univ _), sub_zero, add_zero, card_fin]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
field_simp [hn1, hn3, mul_comm]
· field_simp [hn1]
ring
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the
centroid of an n-dimensional face, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. This definition is only valid when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` is the
result of subtracting `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` from
`mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ =
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n - centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {i₁, i₂}ᶜ := by
ext i
obtain i | i := i
· rw [Pi.sub_apply, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
have hu : #{i₁, i₂}ᶜ = n + 1 := by
simp [card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, h]
rw [hu]
by_cases hi : i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ <;> simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff, hi]
· simp [mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 0 := by
rw [mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib, sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
rw [sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, sub_self]
simp [← card_pos, card_compl, h]
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).weightedVSub s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
| n-dimensional face, is orthogonal to the difference of the two
vertices not in that face. -/
theorem inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2))
{i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
⟪s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points,
s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂⟫ =
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/MongePoint.lean | 187 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Basic
/-!
# Lp seminorm with respect to trimmed measure
In this file we prove basic properties of the Lp-seminorm of a function
with respect to the restriction of a measure to a sub-σ-algebra.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
open Filter
open scoped ENNReal
variable {α E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem eLpNorm'_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
eLpNorm' f q (μ.trim hm) = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm']
congr 1
refine lintegral_trim hm ?_
refine @Measurable.pow_const _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m _ (@Measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal _ m _ ?_) q
apply @StronglyMeasurable.measurable
exact @StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm α m _ _ _ hf
theorem limsup_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
limsup f (ae (μ.trim hm)) = limsup f (ae μ) := by
simp_rw [limsup_eq]
| suffices h_set_eq : { a : ℝ≥0∞ | ∀ᵐ n ∂μ.trim hm, f n ≤ a } = { a : ℝ≥0∞ | ∀ᵐ n ∂μ, f n ≤ a } by
rw [h_set_eq]
ext1 a
suffices h_meas_eq : μ { x | ¬f x ≤ a } = μ.trim hm { x | ¬f x ≤ a } by
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ae_iff, h_meas_eq]
refine (trim_measurableSet_eq hm ?_).symm
refine @MeasurableSet.compl _ _ m (@measurableSet_le ℝ≥0∞ _ _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ hf ?_)
exact @measurable_const _ _ _ m _
theorem essSup_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
essSup f (μ.trim hm) = essSup f μ := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Trim.lean | 35 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : g • a ≤ a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (pow_smul_le h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm h key
end FiniteGroup
section PowIsSubgroup
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative monoid is a submonoid -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative add monoid is a submonoid"]
def submonoidOfIdempotent {M : Type*} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [Finite M] (S : Set M)
(hS1 : S.Nonempty) (hS2 : S * S = S) : Submonoid M :=
have pow_mem (a : M) (ha : a ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) ∈ S := by
induction n with
| zero => rwa [zero_add, pow_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [← hS2, pow_succ]
exact Set.mul_mem_mul ih ha
{ carrier := S
one_mem' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS1
rw [← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt (orderOf_pos a))]
exact pow_mem a ha (orderOf a - 1)
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => (congr_arg₂ (· ∈ ·) rfl hS2).mp (Set.mul_mem_mul ha hb) }
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite group is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite add group is a subgroup"]
def subgroupOfIdempotent {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (S : Set G) (hS1 : S.Nonempty)
(hS2 : S * S = S) : Subgroup G :=
{ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 with
carrier := S
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show a⁻¹ ∈ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 by
rw [← one_mul a⁻¹, ← pow_one a, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← pow_sub a (orderOf_pos a)]
exact pow_mem ha (orderOf a - 1) }
/-- If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite group `G`, then `S ^ |G|` is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) smulCardAddSubgroup
"If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite add group `G`, then `|G| • S` is a subgroup"]
def powCardSubgroup {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (S : Set G) (hS : S.Nonempty) : Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ S ^ Fintype.card G := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS
rw [← pow_card_eq_one]
exact Set.pow_mem_pow ha
subgroupOfIdempotent (S ^ Fintype.card G) ⟨1, one_mem⟩ <| by
classical
apply (Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_mul_left _ one_mem) (ge_of_eq _)).symm
simp_rw [← pow_add,
Group.card_pow_eq_card_pow_card_univ S (Fintype.card G + Fintype.card G) le_add_self]
end PowIsSubgroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_one (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, ha⟩ := ha.exists_pow_eq_one
exact (pow_eq_one_iff_of_nonneg ha₀ hn.ne').1 ha
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a x : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_neg_one (ha₀ : a ≤ 0) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = -1 :=
(sq_eq_one_iff.1 <| ha.pow.eq_one <| sq_nonneg a).resolve_left <| by
rintro rfl; exact one_pos.not_le ha₀
theorem orderOf_abs_ne_one (h : |x| ≠ 1) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
intro n hn hx
replace hx : |x| ^ n = 1 := by simpa only [abs_one, abs_pow] using congr_arg abs hx
rcases h.lt_or_lt with h | h
· exact ((pow_lt_one₀ (abs_nonneg x) h hn.ne').ne hx).elim
· exact ((one_lt_pow₀ h hn.ne').ne' hx).elim
theorem LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two : orderOf x ≤ 2 := by
rcases ne_or_eq |x| 1 with h | h
· simp [orderOf_abs_ne_one h]
rcases eq_or_eq_neg_of_abs_eq h with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
exact orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one zero_lt_two (by simp)
end LinearOrderedRing
section Prod
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {x : α × β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Prod.orderOf (x : α × β) : orderOf x = (orderOf x.1).lcm (orderOf x.2) :=
minimalPeriod_prodMap _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.1 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_fst_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.2 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_snd_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.fst {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.1 :=
hx.mono orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.snd {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.2 :=
hx.mono orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive IsOfFinAddOrder.prod_mk]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.prod_mk : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder b → IsOfFinOrder (a, b) := by
simpa only [← orderOf_pos_iff, Prod.orderOf] using Nat.lcm_pos
@[to_additive]
lemma Prod.orderOf_mk : orderOf (a, b) = Nat.lcm (orderOf a) (orderOf b) :=
(a, b).orderOf
end Prod
-- TODO: Corresponding `pi` lemmas. We cannot currently state them here because of import cycles
@[simp]
lemma Nat.cast_card_eq_zero (R) [AddGroupWithOne R] [Fintype R] : (Fintype.card R : R) = 0 := by
rw [← nsmul_one, card_nsmul_eq_zero]
section NonAssocRing
variable (R : Type*) [NonAssocRing R] (p : ℕ)
lemma CharP.addOrderOf_one : CharP R (addOrderOf (1 : R)) where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_dvd_iff_nsmul_eq_zero]
variable [Fintype R]
variable {R} in
lemma charP_of_ne_zero (hn : card R = p) (hR : ∀ i < p, (i : R) = 0 → i = 0) : CharP R p where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by
have H : (p : R) = 0 := by rw [← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n p, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul, add_zero] at h
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
apply hR _ (Nat.mod_lt _ _) h
rw [← hn, gt_iff_lt, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
exact ⟨0⟩
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul]
end NonAssocRing
lemma charP_of_prime_pow_injective (R) [Ring R] [Fintype R] (p n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(hn : card R = p ^ n) (hR : ∀ i ≤ n, (p : R) ^ i = 0 → i = n) : CharP R (p ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := CharP.exists R
have hcpn : c ∣ p ^ n := by rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R c, ← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ : ∃ i ≤ n, c = p ^ i := by rwa [Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.1] at hcpn
obtain rfl : i = n := hR i hi <| by rw [← Nat.cast_pow, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
assumption
namespace SemiconjBy
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq [Group G] (a : G) {x y : G} (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : orderOf x = orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
intro n
exact (h.pow_right n).eq_one_iff
end SemiconjBy
section single
lemma orderOf_piMulSingle {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [(i : ι) → Monoid (M i)]
(i : ι) (g : M i) :
orderOf (Pi.mulSingle i g) = orderOf g :=
orderOf_injective (MonoidHom.mulSingle M i) (Pi.mulSingle_injective M i) g
end single
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 1,343 | 1,349 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alex Kontorovich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.MulOpposite
/-!
# Mul-opposite subgroups
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace Subgroup
/-- Pull a subgroup back to an opposite subgroup along `MulOpposite.unop` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Pull an additive subgroup back to an opposite additive subgroup along `AddOpposite.unop`"]
protected def op (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ where
carrier := MulOpposite.unop ⁻¹' (H : Set G)
one_mem' := H.one_mem
mul_mem' ha hb := H.mul_mem hb ha
inv_mem' := H.inv_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_op {x : Gᵐᵒᵖ} {S : Subgroup G} : x ∈ S.op ↔ x.unop ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma op_toSubmonoid (H : Subgroup G) :
H.op.toSubmonoid = H.toSubmonoid.op :=
rfl
/-- Pull an opposite subgroup back to a subgroup along `MulOpposite.op` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Pull an opposite additive subgroup back to an additive subgroup along `AddOpposite.op`"]
protected def unop (H : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : Subgroup G where
carrier := MulOpposite.op ⁻¹' (H : Set Gᵐᵒᵖ)
one_mem' := H.one_mem
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => H.mul_mem hb ha
inv_mem' := H.inv_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_unop {x : G} {S : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : x ∈ S.unop ↔ MulOpposite.op x ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma unop_toSubmonoid (H : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) :
H.unop.toSubmonoid = H.toSubmonoid.unop :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_op (S : Subgroup G) : S.op.unop = S := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_unop (S : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : S.unop.op = S := rfl
/-! ### Lattice results -/
@[to_additive]
theorem op_le_iff {S₁ : Subgroup G} {S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.op ≤ S₂ ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂.unop :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive]
theorem le_op_iff {S₁ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} {S₂ : Subgroup G} : S₁ ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁.unop ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_le_op_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subgroup G} : S₁.op ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_le_unop_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.unop ≤ S₂.unop ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.unop_surjective.forall
/-- A subgroup `H` of `G` determines a subgroup `H.op` of the opposite group `Gᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "An additive subgroup `H` of `G` determines an additive subgroup
`H.op` of the opposite additive group `Gᵃᵒᵖ`."]
def opEquiv : Subgroup G ≃o Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun := Subgroup.op
invFun := Subgroup.unop
left_inv := unop_op
right_inv := op_unop
map_rel_iff' := op_le_op_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem op_injective : (@Subgroup.op G _).Injective := opEquiv.injective
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_injective : (@Subgroup.unop G _).Injective := opEquiv.symm.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_inj {S T : Subgroup G} : S.op = T.op ↔ S = T := opEquiv.eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_inj {S T : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : S.unop = T.unop ↔ S = T := opEquiv.symm.eq_iff_eq
/-- Bijection between a subgroup `H` and its opposite. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) "Bijection between an additive subgroup `H` and its opposite."]
def equivOp (H : Subgroup G) : H ≃ H.op :=
MulOpposite.opEquiv.subtypeEquiv fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem op_normalizer (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalizer.op = H.op.normalizer := by
ext x
simp [mem_normalizer_iff', MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall, iff_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_normalizer (H : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : H.normalizer.unop = H.unop.normalizer := by
rw [← op_inj, op_unop, op_normalizer, op_unop]
end Subgroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/MulOpposite.lean | 157 | 160 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
/-!
# Lemmas about divisibility in rings
Note that this file is imported by basic tactics like `linarith` and so must have only minimal
imports. Further results about divisibility in rings may be found in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Lemmas` which is not subject to this import constraint.
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α] [Semigroup β] {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
theorem map_dvd_iff (f : F) {a b} : f a ∣ f b ↔ a ∣ b :=
let f := MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv f
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← f.left_inv a, ← f.left_inv b]; exact map_dvd f.symm h, map_dvd f⟩
theorem MulEquiv.decompositionMonoid (f : F) [DecompositionMonoid β] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal a b c h := by
rw [← map_dvd_iff f, map_mul] at h
obtain ⟨a₁, a₂, h⟩ := DecompositionMonoid.primal _ h
refine ⟨symm f a₁, symm f a₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← map_dvd_iff f, ← map_mul, eq_symm_apply]
iterate 2 erw [(f : α ≃* β).apply_symm_apply]
exact h
/--
If `G` is a `LeftCancelSemiGroup`, left multiplication by `g` yields an equivalence between `G`
and the set of elements of `G` divisible by `g`.
-/
protected noncomputable def Equiv.dvd {G : Type*} [LeftCancelSemigroup G] (g : G) :
G ≃ {a : G // g ∣ a} where
toFun := fun a ↦ ⟨g * a, ⟨a, rfl⟩⟩
invFun := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.choose
left_inv := fun _ ↦ by simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
simp
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.dvd_apply {G : Type*} [LeftCancelSemigroup G] (g a : G) :
Equiv.dvd g a = g * a := rfl
end Semigroup
section DistribSemigroup
variable [Add α] [Semigroup α]
theorem dvd_add [LeftDistribClass α] {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b + c :=
Dvd.elim h₁ fun d hd => Dvd.elim h₂ fun e he => Dvd.intro (d + e) (by simp [left_distrib, hd, he])
alias Dvd.dvd.add := dvd_add
end DistribSemigroup
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] {a b c : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma min_pow_dvd_add (ha : c ^ m ∣ a) (hb : c ^ n ∣ b) : c ^ min m n ∣ a + b :=
((pow_dvd_pow c (m.min_le_left n)).trans ha).add ((pow_dvd_pow c (m.min_le_right n)).trans hb)
end Semiring
section NonUnitalCommSemiring
variable [NonUnitalCommSemiring α]
theorem Dvd.dvd.linear_comb {d x y : α} (hdx : d ∣ x) (hdy : d ∣ y) (a b : α) : d ∣ a * x + b * y :=
dvd_add (hdx.mul_left a) (hdy.mul_left b)
end NonUnitalCommSemiring
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α}
/-- An element `a` of a semigroup with a distributive negation divides the negation of an element
`b` iff `a` divides `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem dvd_neg : a ∣ -b ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp only [Equiv.neg_symm, Equiv.neg_apply, mul_neg, neg_inj, Dvd.dvd]
/-- The negation of an element `a` of a semigroup with a distributive negation divides another
element `b` iff `a` divides `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_dvd : -a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp only [Equiv.neg_symm, Equiv.neg_apply, mul_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg, Dvd.dvd]
alias ⟨Dvd.dvd.of_neg_left, Dvd.dvd.neg_left⟩ := neg_dvd
alias ⟨Dvd.dvd.of_neg_right, Dvd.dvd.neg_right⟩ := dvd_neg
end Semigroup
section NonUnitalRing
variable [NonUnitalRing α] {a b c : α}
theorem dvd_sub (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b - c := by
simpa only [← sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_right
alias Dvd.dvd.sub := dvd_sub
/-- If an element `a` divides another element `c` in a ring, `a` divides the sum of another element
`b` with `c` iff `a` divides `b`. -/
theorem dvd_add_left (h : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨fun H => by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using dvd_sub H h, fun h₂ => dvd_add h₂ h⟩
/-- If an element `a` divides another element `b` in a ring, `a` divides the sum of `b` and another
element `c` iff `a` divides `c`. -/
theorem dvd_add_right (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c := by rw [add_comm]; exact dvd_add_left h
/-- If an element `a` divides another element `c` in a ring, `a` divides the difference of another
element `b` with `c` iff `a` divides `b`. -/
theorem dvd_sub_left (h : a ∣ c) : a ∣ b - c ↔ a ∣ b := by
simpa only [← sub_eq_add_neg] using dvd_add_left (dvd_neg.2 h)
/-- If an element `a` divides another element `b` in a ring, `a` divides the difference of `b` and
another element `c` iff `a` divides `c`. -/
theorem dvd_sub_right (h : a ∣ b) : a ∣ b - c ↔ a ∣ c := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, dvd_add_right h, dvd_neg]
theorem dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub (h : a ∣ b - c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c := by
rw [← sub_add_cancel b c, dvd_add_right h]
theorem dvd_sub_comm : a ∣ b - c ↔ a ∣ c - b := by rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub]
end NonUnitalRing
section Ring
|
variable [Ring α] {a b : α}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Divisibility/Basic.lean | 146 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Luke Mantle. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Mantle
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
/-!
# Hermite polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial.hermite n`, the `n`th probabilists' Hermite polynomial.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.hermite n`: the `n`th probabilists' Hermite polynomial,
defined recursively as a `Polynomial ℤ`
## Results
* `Polynomial.hermite_succ`: the recursion `hermite (n+1) = (x - d/dx) (hermite n)`
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_explicit`: a closed formula for (nonvanishing) coefficients in terms
of binomial coefficients and double factorials.
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_of_odd_add`: for `n`,`k` where `n+k` is odd, `(hermite n).coeff k` is
zero.
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_of_even_add`: a closed formula for `(hermite n).coeff k` when `n+k` is
even, equivalent to `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_explicit`.
* `Polynomial.monic_hermite`: for all `n`, `hermite n` is monic.
* `Polynomial.degree_hermite`: for all `n`, `hermite n` has degree `n`.
## References
* [Hermite Polynomials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermite_polynomials)
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
/-- the probabilists' Hermite polynomials. -/
noncomputable def hermite : ℕ → Polynomial ℤ
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * hermite n - derivative (hermite n)
/-- The recursion `hermite (n+1) = (x - d/dx) (hermite n)` -/
@[simp]
theorem hermite_succ (n : ℕ) : hermite (n + 1) = X * hermite n - derivative (hermite n) := by
rw [hermite]
theorem hermite_eq_iterate (n : ℕ) : hermite n = (fun p => X * p - derivative p)^[n] 1 := by
induction n with
| | zero => rfl
| succ n ih => rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', ← ih, hermite_succ]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Hermite/Basic.lean | 55 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Basic
/-!
# Frames, completely distributive lattices and complete Boolean algebras
In this file we define and provide API for (co)frames, completely distributive lattices and
complete Boolean algebras.
We distinguish two different distributivity properties:
1. `inf_iSup_eq : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i` (finite `⊓` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This is required by `Frame`, `CompleteDistribLattice`, and `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`
(`Coframe`, etc., require the dual property).
2. `iInf_iSup_eq : (⨅ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ s, ⨅ i, f i (s i)`
(infinite `⨅` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This stronger property is called "completely distributive",
and is required by `CompletelyDistribLattice` and `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`.
## Typeclasses
* `Order.Frame`: Frame: A complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`.
* `Order.Coframe`: Coframe: A complete lattice whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`.
* `CompleteDistribLattice`: Complete distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose `⊓` and `⊔`
distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompletelyDistribLattice`: Completely distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose
`⨅` and `⨆` satisfy `iInf_iSup_eq`.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: Complete atomic Boolean algebra:
A complete Boolean algebra which is additionally completely distributive.
(This implies that it's (co)atom(ist)ic.)
A set of opens gives rise to a topological space precisely if it forms a frame. Such a frame is also
completely distributive, but not all frames are. `Filter` is a coframe but not a completely
distributive lattice.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Complete Heyting algebra*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Heyting_algebra)
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
open Function Set
universe u v w w'
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {κ : ι → Sort w'}
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a frame. Do NOT use,
except for implementing `Order.Frame` via `Order.Frame.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl` fields, which can be recovered using
`Order.Frame.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
class Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf (a : α) (s : Set α) : a ⊓ sSup s ≤ ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a coframe. Do NOT
use, except for implementing `Order.Coframe` via `Order.Coframe.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`Order.Coframe.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
class Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf (a : α) (s : Set α) : ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b ≤ a ⊔ sInf s
/-- A frame, aka complete Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
class Order.Frame (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α, HeytingAlgebra α where
/-- `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
theorem inf_sSup_eq {α : Type*} [Order.Frame α] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
gc_inf_himp.l_sSup
/-- A coframe, aka complete Brouwer algebra or complete co-Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice
whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
class Order.Coframe (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α, CoheytingAlgebra α where
/-- `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
theorem sup_sInf_eq {α : Type*} [Order.Coframe α] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
a ⊔ sInf s = ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b :=
gc_sdiff_sup.u_sInf
open Order
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a complete
distributive lattice. Do NOT use, except for implementing `CompleteDistribLattice` via
`CompleteDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl`, `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`CompleteDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
structure CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u)
extends CompleteLattice α,
toFrameMinimalAxioms : Frame.MinimalAxioms α,
toCoframeMinimalAxioms : Coframe.MinimalAxioms α where
-- We give those projections better name further down
attribute [nolint docBlame] CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.toFrameMinimalAxioms
CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.toCoframeMinimalAxioms
/-- A complete distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⊔` and `⊓` respectively
distribute over `⨅` and `⨆`. -/
class CompleteDistribLattice (α : Type*) extends Frame α, Coframe α, BiheytingAlgebra α
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a completely
distributive. Do NOT use, except for implementing `CompletelyDistribLattice` via
`CompletelyDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl`, `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`CompletelyDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
structure CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
/-- A completely distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⨅` and `⨆`
distribute over each other. -/
class CompletelyDistribLattice (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α, BiheytingAlgebra α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
theorem le_iInf_iSup [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)) ≤ ⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ a) (le_iSup _ _)
lemma iSup_iInf_le [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b ≤ ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) :=
le_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
namespace Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) {s : Set α} {a b : α}
lemma inf_sSup_eq : a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
(minAx.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf _ _).antisymm iSup_inf_le_inf_sSup
lemma sSup_inf_eq : sSup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_sSup_eq α _ s b
lemma iSup_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_range]
lemma inf_iSup_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using minAx.iSup_inf_eq f a
lemma inf_iSup₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ i, ⨆ j, a ⊓ f i j := by
simp only [inf_iSup_eq]
/-- The `Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a frame. -/
def of [Frame α] : MinimalAxioms α where
__ := ‹Frame α›
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s := _root_.inf_sSup_eq.le
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a frame instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
This sets `a ⇨ b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}` and `aᶜ := a ⇨ ⊥`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : Frame α where
__ := minAx
compl a := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ ⊥}
himp a b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}
le_himp_iff _ b c :=
⟨fun h ↦ (inf_le_inf_right _ h).trans (by simp [minAx.sSup_inf_eq]), fun h ↦ le_sSup h⟩
himp_bot _ := rfl
end Order.Frame
namespace Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) {s : Set α} {a b : α}
lemma sup_sInf_eq : a ⊔ sInf s = ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b :=
sup_sInf_le_iInf_sup.antisymm (minAx.iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf _ _)
lemma sInf_sup_eq : sInf s ⊔ b = ⨅ a ∈ s, a ⊔ b := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using @sup_sInf_eq α _ s b
lemma iInf_sup_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨅ i, f i) ⊔ a = ⨅ i, f i ⊔ a := by
rw [iInf, sInf_sup_eq, iInf_range]
lemma sup_iInf_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊔ ⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a ⊔ f i := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using minAx.iInf_sup_eq f a
lemma sup_iInf₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (a ⊔ ⨅ i, ⨅ j, f i j) = ⨅ i, ⨅ j, a ⊔ f i j := by
simp only [sup_iInf_eq]
/-- The `Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a frame. -/
def of [Coframe α] : MinimalAxioms α where
__ := ‹Coframe α›
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s := _root_.sup_sInf_eq.ge
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a coframe instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
| This sets `a \ b := sInf {c | a ≤ b ⊔ c}` and `￢a := ⊤ \ a`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : Coframe α where
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteBooleanAlgebra.lean | 202 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Basis on a quaternion-like algebra
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃`: a basis for a subspace of an `R`-algebra `A` that has the
same algebra structure as `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.self R`: the canonical basis for `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.compHom b f`: transform a basis `b` by an AlgHom `f`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.lift`: Define an `AlgHom` out of `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` by its action on the basis
elements `i`, `j`, and `k`. In essence, this is a universal property. Analogous to `Complex.lift`,
but takes a bundled `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis` instead of just a `Subtype` as the amount of
data / proves is non-negligible.
-/
open Quaternion
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
/-- A quaternion basis contains the information both sufficient and necessary to construct an
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to `A`; or equivalently, a surjective
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to an `R`-subalgebra of `A`.
Note that for definitional convenience, `k` is provided as a field even though `i_mul_j` fully
determines it. -/
structure Basis {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) where
/-- The first imaginary unit -/
i : A
/-- The second imaginary unit -/
j : A
/-- The third imaginary unit -/
k : A
i_mul_i : i * i = c₁ • (1 : A) + c₂ • i
j_mul_j : j * j = c₃ • (1 : A)
i_mul_j : i * j = k
j_mul_i : j * i = c₂ • j - k
variable {R : Type*} {A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R}
namespace Basis
/-- Since `k` is redundant, it is not necessary to show `q₁.k = q₂.k` when showing `q₁ = q₂`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext ⦃q₁ q₂ : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃⦄ (hi : q₁.i = q₂.i)
(hj : q₁.j = q₂.j) : q₁ = q₂ := by
cases q₁; rename_i q₁_i_mul_j _
cases q₂; rename_i q₂_i_mul_j _
congr
rw [← q₁_i_mul_j, ← q₂_i_mul_j]
congr
variable (R) in
/-- There is a natural quaternionic basis for the `QuaternionAlgebra`. -/
@[simps i j k]
protected def self : Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃ where
i := ⟨0, 1, 0, 0⟩
i_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
j := ⟨0, 0, 1, 0⟩
j_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
k := ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩
i_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
j_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
instance : Inhabited (Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃) :=
⟨Basis.self R⟩
variable (q : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃)
attribute [simp] i_mul_i j_mul_j i_mul_j j_mul_i
@[simp]
theorem i_mul_k : q.i * q.k = c₁ • q.j + c₂ • q.k := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, i_mul_i, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/QuaternionBasis.lean | 84 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Homology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Basic
/-!
# Abelian categories have homology
In this file, it is shown that all short complexes `S` in abelian
categories have terms of type `S.HomologyData`.
The strategy of the proof is to study the morphism
`kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f`. We show that there is a
`LeftHomologyData` for `S` for which the `H` field consists
of the coimage of `kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f`, while
there is a `RightHomologyData` for which the `H` is the
image of `kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f`. The fact that
these left and right homology data are compatible (i.e.
provide a `HomologyData`) is obtained by using the
coimage-image isomorphism in abelian categories.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Abelian C] (S : ShortComplex C)
namespace ShortComplex
/-- The canonical morphism `Abelian.image S.f ⟶ kernel S.g` for a short complex `S`
in an abelian category. -/
noncomputable def abelianImageToKernel : Abelian.image S.f ⟶ kernel S.g :=
kernel.lift S.g (Abelian.image.ι S.f)
(by simp only [← cancel_epi (Abelian.factorThruImage S.f),
kernel.lift_ι_assoc, zero, comp_zero])
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma abelianImageToKernel_comp_kernel_ι :
S.abelianImageToKernel ≫ kernel.ι S.g = Abelian.image.ι S.f :=
kernel.lift_ι _ _ _
instance : Mono S.abelianImageToKernel :=
mono_of_mono_fac S.abelianImageToKernel_comp_kernel_ι
@[reassoc]
| lemma abelianImageToKernel_comp_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π :
S.abelianImageToKernel ≫ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Abelian.lean | 54 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Composition
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Partitions
A partition of a natural number `n` is a way of writing `n` as a sum of positive integers, where the
order does not matter: two sums that differ only in the order of their summands are considered the
same partition. This notion is closely related to that of a composition of `n`, but in a composition
of `n` the order does matter.
A summand of the partition is called a part.
## Main functions
* `p : Partition n` is a structure, made of a multiset of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is to show Euler's partition theorem, and
related results.
The representation of a partition as a multiset is very handy as multisets are very flexible and
already have a well-developed API.
## TODO
Link this to Young diagrams.
## Tags
Partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory)>
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Multiset
namespace Nat
/-- A partition of `n` is a multiset of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Partition (n : ℕ) where
/-- positive integers summing to `n` -/
parts : Multiset ℕ
/-- proof that the `parts` are positive -/
parts_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ parts → 0 < i
/-- proof that the `parts` sum to `n` -/
parts_sum : parts.sum = n
deriving DecidableEq
namespace Partition
@[deprecated "Partition now derives an instance of DecidableEq." (since := "2024-12-28")]
instance decidableEqPartition {n : ℕ} : DecidableEq (Partition n) :=
fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Partition.ext_iff
/-- A composition induces a partition (just convert the list to a multiset). -/
@[simps]
def ofComposition (n : ℕ) (c : Composition n) : Partition n where
parts := c.blocks
parts_pos hi := c.blocks_pos hi
parts_sum := by rw [Multiset.sum_coe, c.blocks_sum]
theorem ofComposition_surj {n : ℕ} : Function.Surjective (ofComposition n) := by
rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
induction b using Quotient.inductionOn with | _ b => ?_
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁, by simpa using hb₂⟩, Partition.ext rfl⟩
-- The argument `n` is kept explicit here since it is useful in tactic mode proofs to generate the
-- proof obligation `l.sum = n`.
/-- Given a multiset which sums to `n`, construct a partition of `n` with the same multiset, but
without the zeros.
-/
@[simps]
def ofSums (n : ℕ) (l : Multiset ℕ) (hl : l.sum = n) : Partition n where
parts := l.filter (· ≠ 0)
parts_pos hi := (of_mem_filter hi).bot_lt
parts_sum := by
have lz : (l.filter (· = 0)).sum = 0 := by simp [sum_eq_zero_iff]
rwa [← filter_add_not (· = 0) l, sum_add, lz, zero_add] at hl
/-- A `Multiset ℕ` induces a partition on its sum. -/
@[simps!]
def ofMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) : Partition l.sum := ofSums _ l rfl
/-- An element `s` of `Sym σ n` induces a partition given by its multiplicities. -/
def ofSym {n : ℕ} {σ : Type*} (s : Sym σ n) [DecidableEq σ] : n.Partition where
parts := s.1.dedup.map s.1.count
parts_pos := by simp [Multiset.count_pos]
parts_sum := by
show ∑ a ∈ s.1.toFinset, count a s.1 = n
rw [toFinset_sum_count_eq]
exact s.2
variable {n : ℕ} {σ τ : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq τ]
@[simp] lemma ofSym_map (e : σ ≃ τ) (s : Sym σ n) :
| ofSym (s.map e) = ofSym s := by
simp only [ofSym, Sym.val_eq_coe, Sym.coe_map, toFinset_val, mk.injEq]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Partition.lean | 108 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions based on membership of a sequence of sets
Let `f : ℕ → Set α` be a sequence of sets. For `n : ℕ`, we can form the set of points that are in
`f 0 ∪ f 1 ∪ ... ∪ f (n-1)`; then the set of points in `(f 0)ᶜ ∪ f 1 ∪ ... ∪ f (n-1)` and so on for
all 2^n choices of a set or its complement. The at most 2^n sets we obtain form a partition
of `univ : Set α`. We call that partition `memPartition f n` (the membership partition of `f`).
For `n = 0` we set `memPartition f 0 = {univ}`.
The partition `memPartition f (n + 1)` is finer than `memPartition f n`.
## Main definitions
* `memPartition f n`: the membership partition of the first `n` sets in `f`.
* `memPartitionSet`: `memPartitionSet f n x` is the set in the partition `memPartition f n` to
which `x` belongs.
## Main statements
* `disjoint_memPartition`: the sets in `memPartition f n` are disjoint
* `sUnion_memPartition`: the union of the sets in `memPartition f n` is `univ`
* `finite_memPartition`: `memPartition f n` is finite
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `memPartition f n` is the partition containing at most `2^(n+1)` sets, where each set contains
the points that for all `i` belong to one of `f i` or its complement. -/
def memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) : ℕ → Set (Set α)
| 0 => {univ}
| n + 1 => {s | ∃ u ∈ memPartition f n, s = u ∩ f n ∨ s = u \ f n}
@[simp]
lemma memPartition_zero (f : ℕ → Set α) : memPartition f 0 = {univ} := rfl
lemma memPartition_succ (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
memPartition f (n + 1) = {s | ∃ u ∈ memPartition f n, s = u ∩ f n ∨ s = u \ f n} :=
rfl
lemma disjoint_memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) {u v : Set α}
(hu : u ∈ memPartition f n) (hv : v ∈ memPartition f n) (huv : u ≠ v) :
Disjoint u v := by
revert u v
induction n with
| zero =>
intro u v hu hv huv
simp only [memPartition_zero, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at hu hv
rw [hu, hv] at huv
exact absurd rfl huv
| succ n ih =>
intro u v hu hv huv
rw [memPartition_succ] at hu hv
obtain ⟨u', hu', hu'_eq⟩ := hu
obtain ⟨v', hv', hv'_eq⟩ := hv
rcases hu'_eq with rfl | rfl <;> rcases hv'_eq with rfl | rfl
· refine Disjoint.mono inter_subset_left inter_subset_left (ih hu' hv' ?_)
exact fun huv' ↦ huv (huv' ▸ rfl)
· exact Disjoint.mono_left inter_subset_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_right
· exact Disjoint.mono_right inter_subset_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_left
· refine Disjoint.mono diff_subset diff_subset (ih hu' hv' ?_)
exact fun huv' ↦ huv (huv' ▸ rfl)
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃₀ memPartition f n = univ := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [memPartition_succ]
ext x
have : x ∈ ⋃₀ memPartition f n := by simp [ih]
simp only [mem_sUnion, mem_iUnion, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, mem_univ,
iff_true] at this ⊢
obtain ⟨t, ht, hxt⟩ := this
by_cases hxf : x ∈ f n
· exact ⟨t ∩ f n, ⟨t, ht, Or.inl rfl⟩, hxt, hxf⟩
· exact ⟨t \ f n, ⟨t, ht, Or.inr rfl⟩, hxt, hxf⟩
lemma finite_memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : Set.Finite (memPartition f n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [memPartition_succ]
have : Finite (memPartition f n) := Set.finite_coe_iff.mp ih
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff]
simp_rw [setOf_exists, ← exists_prop, setOf_exists, setOf_or]
refine Finite.Set.finite_biUnion (memPartition f n) _ (fun u _ ↦ ?_)
rw [Set.finite_coe_iff]
simp
instance instFinite_memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : Finite (memPartition f n) :=
Set.finite_coe_iff.mp (finite_memPartition _ _)
noncomputable
instance instFintype_memPartition (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : Fintype (memPartition f n) :=
(finite_memPartition f n).fintype
open Classical in
/-- The set in `memPartition f n` to which `a : α` belongs. -/
def memPartitionSet (f : ℕ → Set α) : ℕ → α → Set α
| 0 => fun _ ↦ univ
| n + 1 => fun a ↦ if a ∈ f n then memPartitionSet f n a ∩ f n else memPartitionSet f n a \ f n
@[simp]
lemma memPartitionSet_zero (f : ℕ → Set α) (a : α) : memPartitionSet f 0 a = univ := by
simp [memPartitionSet]
lemma memPartitionSet_succ (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ f n)] :
memPartitionSet f (n + 1) a
= if a ∈ f n then memPartitionSet f n a ∩ f n else memPartitionSet f n a \ f n := by
simp [memPartitionSet]
lemma memPartitionSet_mem (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
memPartitionSet f n a ∈ memPartition f n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [memPartitionSet]
| succ n ih =>
classical
rw [memPartitionSet_succ, memPartition_succ]
refine ⟨memPartitionSet f n a, ?_⟩
split_ifs <;> simp [ih]
lemma mem_memPartitionSet (f : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : a ∈ memPartitionSet f n a := by
| induction n with
| zero => simp [memPartitionSet]
| succ n ih =>
classical
rw [memPartitionSet_succ]
split_ifs with h <;> exact ⟨ih, h⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/MemPartition.lean | 133 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Split polynomials
A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its
irreducible factors over `L` have degree `1`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Splits i f`: A predicate on a homomorphism `i : K →+* L` from a commutative ring to a
field and a polynomial `f` saying that `f.map i` is zero or all of its irreducible factors over
`L` have degree `1`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- A polynomial `Splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1. -/
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.orderSucc_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i ((degree_map_le.trans hf).antisymm hif)
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
theorem splits_pow {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (n : ℕ) : (f ^ n).Splits i := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact splits_prod i fun j _ => hf
theorem splits_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).Splits i :=
splits_pow i (splits_X i) n
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : K[X]} : (f.map i).Splits (RingHom.id L) ↔ f.Splits i := by
rw [splits_map_iff, RingHom.id_comp]
variable {i}
theorem Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i := by
by_cases hzero : map i (f.comp p) = 0
· exact Or.inl hzero
cases h with
| inl h0 =>
exact Or.inl <| map_comp i _ _ ▸ h0.symm ▸ zero_comp
| inr h =>
right
intro g irr dvd
rw [map_comp] at dvd hzero
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hd with
| inl hd =>
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (Nat.WithBot.lt_one_iff_le_zero.mp hd), comp_C] at dvd hzero
refine False.elim (irr.1 (isUnit_of_dvd_unit dvd ?_))
simpa using hzero
| inr hd =>
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr
(ne_zero_of_degree_gt (n := ⊥) (by rw [hd]; decide)))
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hd, dvd_comp_C_mul_X_add_C_iff _ _] at dvd
have := h (irr.map (algEquivCMulXAddC _ _).symm) dvd
rw [degree_eq_natDegree irr.ne_zero]
| rwa [algEquivCMulXAddC_symm_apply, ← comp_eq_aeval,
degree_eq_natDegree (fun h => WithBot.bot_ne_one (h ▸ this)),
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 164 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,566 | 2,567 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Ideal
/-!
# Ideal operations for Lie algebras
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, there is a natural action of the Lie ideals of `L`
on the Lie submodules of `M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, this
provides a pairing of Lie ideals which is especially important. For example, it can be used to
define solvability / nilpotency of a Lie algebra via the derived / lower-central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.hasBracket`
* `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span`
* `LieIdeal.map_bracket_le`
* `LieIdeal.comap_bracket_le`
## Notation
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` and a Lie
ideal `I ⊆ L`, we introduce the notation `⁅I, N⁆` for the Lie submodule of `M` corresponding to
the action defined in this file.
## Tags
lie algebra, ideal operation
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
theorem map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : Set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
theorem map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf
theorem le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : Set M).subset_preimage_image f
theorem comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact (N : Set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_incl : map N.incl (comap N.incl N') = N ⊓ N' := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj]
exact (N : Submodule R M).map_comap_subtype N'
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M₂] (I J : LieIdeal R L)
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the set of Lie ideals of `L` acts on the set
of submodules of `M`. -/
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }⟩
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } :=
rfl
/-- See also `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'` and
`LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_tensor_map_range`. -/
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' _ ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hm'
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ _ _ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' _ hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅x, n⁆ | (x ∈ I) (n ∈ N) } := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
theorem lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩
exact h x hx m hm
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply subset_lieSpan; use x, m
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
lie_coe_mem_lie ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
theorem lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ := by
suffices ∀ I J : LieIdeal R L, ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆ by exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I)
clear! I J; intro I J
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro x ⟨y, z, h⟩; rw [← h]
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← LieSubmodule.coe_neg]
apply lie_coe_mem_lie
theorem lie_le_right : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
exact N.lie_mem n.property
theorem lie_le_left : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I := by rw [lie_comm]; exact lie_le_right I J
theorem lie_le_inf : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I ⊓ J := by rw [le_inf_iff]; exact ⟨lie_le_left I J, lie_le_right J I⟩
@[simp]
theorem lie_bot : ⁅I, (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⁆ = ⊥ := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; apply lie_le_right
@[simp]
theorem bot_lie : ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ := by
suffices ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ ≤ ⊥ by exact le_bot_iff.mp this
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
change x ∈ (⊥ : LieIdeal R L) at hx; rw [mem_bot] at hx; simp [hx]
theorem lie_eq_bot_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅(x : L), m⁆ = 0 := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⁅x, m⁆ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h - ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩⟩
exact h x hx n hn
variable {I J N N'} in
theorem mono_lie (h₁ : I ≤ J) (h₂ : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N'⁆ := by
intro m h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan] at h; rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN; apply h; rintro m' ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, hm⟩; rw [← hm]; apply hN
use ⟨x, h₁ hx⟩, ⟨n, h₂ hn⟩
variable {I J} in
theorem mono_lie_left (h : I ≤ J) : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N⁆ :=
mono_lie h (le_refl N)
variable {N N'} in
theorem mono_lie_right (h : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N'⁆ :=
mono_lie (le_refl I) h
@[simp]
theorem lie_sup : ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_right <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
suffices ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
rintro m ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, h⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup] at hn ⊢
rcases hn with ⟨n₁, hn₁, n₂, hn₂, hn'⟩
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ : N')⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
simp [← h, ← hn']
@[simp]
theorem sup_lie : ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_left <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
| suffices ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, h⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 190 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SFinite ν] [SFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prodMk_right
apply measurable_const.prodMk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ae : (ae μ)⁻¹ = ae μ := by
refine le_antisymm (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae ?_
nth_rewrite 1 [← inv_inv (ae μ)]
exact Filter.map_mono (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventuallyConst_inv_set_ae :
EventuallyConst (s⁻¹ : Set G) (ae μ) ↔ EventuallyConst s (ae μ) := by
rw [← inv_preimage, eventuallyConst_preimage, Filter.map_inv, inv_ae]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
have := map_map (μ := μ) (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
rw [← this]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
setLIntegral_one]
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false] at h1
exact h1
section SigmaFinite
variable (μ' ν' : Measure G) [SigmaFinite μ'] [SigmaFinite ν'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ']
[IsMulLeftInvariant ν']
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top (hμs : μ' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
wlog sm : MeasurableSet s generalizing s
· filter_upwards [this ((measure_toMeasurable _).trans_ne hμs) (measurableSet_toMeasurable ..)]
with x hx using lt_of_le_of_lt (by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable) hx
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν'.inv _ ?_
intro A hA _ h3A
simp only [ν'.inv_apply] at h3A
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν' sm)
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ' ν' sm (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv)
rw [lintegral_indicator hA.inv] at h1
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, setLIntegral_one, ← image_inv_eq_inv, indicator_image inv_injective,
image_inv_eq_inv, ← indicator_mul_right _ fun x => ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s), Function.comp,
Pi.one_apply, mul_one] at h1
rw [← lintegral_indicator hA, ← h1]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs h3A.ne
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν' ν' h3s).filter_mono ?_
refine (absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant μ' ν' ?_).ae_le
refine mt ?_ h2s
intro hν
rw [hν, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A].
Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that
`μ t = c * μ s` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos].
In the last line, the equality `g(x⁻¹)ν(sx⁻¹) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that
`0 < ν(sx⁻¹) < ∞`. The first inequality follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is
not justified. We prove this inequality for almost all `x` in
`MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`. -/
@[to_additive
"A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. Note that
if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that `μ t = c * μ s` for a
constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
|
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos]. In the last line, the equality
`g(-x) + ν(s - x) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that `0 < ν(s - x) < ∞`. The first inequality
follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is not justified. We prove this inequality for
almost all `x` in `MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`."]
theorem measure_lintegral_div_measure (sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞)
(f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ' s * ∫⁻ y, f y⁻¹ / ν' ((· * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν') = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ' := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 296 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,111 | 1,112 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Big operators on a list in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of list big operators with ordered
groups/monoids.
-/
variable {ι α M N : Type*}
namespace List
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M]
@[to_additive sum_le_sum]
lemma Forall₂.prod_le_prod' [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] {l₁ l₂ : List M} (h : Forall₂ (· ≤ ·) l₁ l₂) :
l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod := by
induction h with
| nil => rfl
| cons hab ih ih' => simpa only [prod_cons] using mul_le_mul' hab ih'
/-- If `l₁` is a sublist of `l₂` and all elements of `l₂` are greater than or equal to one, then
`l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod`. One can prove a stronger version assuming `∀ a ∈ l₂.diff l₁, 1 ≤ a` instead
of `∀ a ∈ l₂, 1 ≤ a` but this lemma is not yet in `mathlib`. -/
@[to_additive sum_le_sum "If `l₁` is a sublist of `l₂` and all elements of `l₂` are nonnegative,
then `l₁.sum ≤ l₂.sum`.
One can prove a stronger version assuming `∀ a ∈ l₂.diff l₁, 0 ≤ a` instead of `∀ a ∈ l₂, 0 ≤ a`
but this lemma is not yet in `mathlib`."]
lemma Sublist.prod_le_prod' [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] {l₁ l₂ : List M} (h : l₁ <+ l₂)
(h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, (1 : M) ≤ a) : l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod := by
induction h with
| slnil => rfl
| cons a _ ih' =>
simp only [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at h₁ ⊢
exact (ih' h₁.2).trans (le_mul_of_one_le_left' h₁.1)
| cons₂ a _ ih' =>
simp only [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at h₁ ⊢
exact mul_le_mul_left' (ih' h₁.2) _
@[to_additive sum_le_sum]
lemma SublistForall₂.prod_le_prod' [Preorder M]
[MulRightMono M] [MulLeftMono M]
{l₁ l₂ : List M} (h : SublistForall₂ (· ≤ ·) l₁ l₂) (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, (1 : M) ≤ a) :
l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod :=
let ⟨_, hall, hsub⟩ := sublistForall₂_iff.1 h
hall.prod_le_prod'.trans <| hsub.prod_le_prod' h₁
@[to_additive sum_le_sum]
lemma prod_le_prod' [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] {l : List ι} {f g : ι → M} (h : ∀ i ∈ l, f i ≤ g i) :
(l.map f).prod ≤ (l.map g).prod :=
Forall₂.prod_le_prod' <| by simpa
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum]
lemma prod_lt_prod' [Preorder M] [MulLeftStrictMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] [MulRightStrictMono M]
[MulRightMono M] {l : List ι} (f g : ι → M)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ l, f i ≤ g i) (h₂ : ∃ i ∈ l, f i < g i) : (l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod := by
induction' l with i l ihl
· rcases h₂ with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩
simp only [forall_mem_cons, map_cons, prod_cons] at h₁ ⊢
simp only [mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp] at h₂
cases h₂
· exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le ‹_› (prod_le_prod' h₁.2)
· exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h₁.1 <| ihl h₁.2 ‹_›
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_lt_prod_of_ne_nil [Preorder M] [MulLeftStrictMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] [MulRightStrictMono M]
[MulRightMono M] {l : List ι} (hl : l ≠ []) (f g : ι → M)
(hlt : ∀ i ∈ l, f i < g i) : (l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod :=
(prod_lt_prod' f g fun i hi => (hlt i hi).le) <|
(exists_mem_of_ne_nil l hl).imp fun i hi => ⟨hi, hlt i hi⟩
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_le_pow_card [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] (l : List M) (n : M) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ n) :
l.prod ≤ n ^ l.length := by
simpa only [map_id', map_const', prod_replicate] using prod_le_prod' h
@[to_additive card_nsmul_le_sum]
lemma pow_card_le_prod [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] (l : List M) (n : M) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, n ≤ x) :
n ^ l.length ≤ l.prod :=
@prod_le_pow_card Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ l n h
@[to_additive exists_lt_of_sum_lt]
lemma exists_lt_of_prod_lt' [LinearOrder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] {l : List ι} (f g : ι → M)
(h : (l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod) : ∃ i ∈ l, f i < g i := by
contrapose! h
exact prod_le_prod' h
@[to_additive exists_le_of_sum_le]
lemma exists_le_of_prod_le' [LinearOrder M] [MulLeftStrictMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] [MulRightStrictMono M]
[MulRightMono M] {l : List ι} (hl : l ≠ []) (f g : ι → M)
(h : (l.map f).prod ≤ (l.map g).prod) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x := by
contrapose! h
exact prod_lt_prod_of_ne_nil hl _ _ h
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [Preorder M] [MulLeftMono M] {l : List M}
(hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : M) ≤ x) : 1 ≤ l.prod := by
-- We don't use `pow_card_le_prod` to avoid assumption
-- [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)]
induction' l with hd tl ih
· rfl
rw [prod_cons]
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd mem_cons_self) (ih fun x h => hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h))
| @[to_additive]
lemma max_prod_le (l : List α) (f g : α → M) [LinearOrder M]
[MulLeftMono M] [MulRightMono M] :
max (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod ≤ (l.map fun i ↦ max (f i) (g i)).prod := by
rw [max_le_iff]
constructor <;> apply List.prod_le_prod' <;> intros
· apply le_max_left
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/List.lean | 122 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
integralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
integralPowerBasis_gen (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
rw [integralPowerBasis', integralPowerBasis_dim (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
· simp
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
| @[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
-- The `unusedHavesSuffices` linter incorrectly thinks this `have` is unnecessary.
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 280 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.CoprodI
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
/-!
## Pushouts of Monoids and Groups
This file defines wide pushouts of monoids and groups and proves some properties
of the amalgamated product of groups (i.e. the special case where all the maps
in the diagram are injective).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.PushoutI`: the pushout of a diagram of monoids indexed by a type `ι`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.base`: the map from the amalgamating monoid to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of`: the map from each Monoid in the family to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.lift`: the universal property used to define homomorphisms out of the pushout.
- `Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord`: a normal form for words in the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of_injective`: if all the maps in the diagram are injective in a pushout of
groups then so is `of`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.Reduced.eq_empty_of_mem_range`: For any word `w` in the coproduct,
if `w` is reduced (i.e none its letters are in the image of the base monoid), and nonempty, then
`w` itself is not in the image of the base monoid.
## References
* The normal form theorem follows these [notes](https://webspace.maths.qmul.ac.uk/i.m.chiswell/ggt/lecture_notes/lecture2.pdf)
from Queen Mary University
## Tags
amalgamated product, pushout, group
-/
namespace Monoid
open CoprodI Subgroup Coprod Function List
variable {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} {H : Type*} {K : Type*} [Monoid K]
/-- The relation we quotient by to form the pushout -/
def PushoutI.con [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) :
Con (Coprod (CoprodI G) H) :=
conGen (fun x y : Coprod (CoprodI G) H =>
∃ i x', x = inl (of (φ i x')) ∧ y = inr x')
/-- The indexed pushout of monoids, which is the pushout in the category of monoids,
or the category of groups. -/
def PushoutI [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) : Type _ :=
(PushoutI.con φ).Quotient
namespace PushoutI
section Monoid
variable [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
protected instance mul : Mul (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
protected instance one : One (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
instance monoid : Monoid (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.monoid _ with
toMul := PushoutI.mul
toOne := PushoutI.one }
/-- The map from each indexing group into the pushout -/
def of (i : ι) : G i →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp <| inl.comp CoprodI.of
variable (φ) in
/-- The map from the base monoid into the pushout -/
def base : H →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp inr
theorem of_comp_eq_base (i : ι) : (of i).comp (φ i) = (base φ) := by
ext x
apply (Con.eq _).2
refine ConGen.Rel.of _ _ ?_
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
variable (φ) in
theorem of_apply_eq_base (i : ι) (x : H) : of i (φ i x) = base φ x := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_comp_eq_base]
/-- Define a homomorphism out of the pushout of monoids be defining it on each object in the
diagram -/
def lift (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k) :
PushoutI φ →* K :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift (CoprodI.lift f) k) <| by
apply Con.conGen_le fun x y => ?_
rintro ⟨i, x', rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply] at hf
simp [hf]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
{i : ι} (g : G i) : (lift f k hf) (of i g : PushoutI φ) = f i g := by
delta PushoutI lift of
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe,
lift_apply_inl, CoprodI.lift_of]
@[simp]
theorem lift_base (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
(g : H) : (lift f k hf) (base φ g : PushoutI φ) = k g := by
delta PushoutI lift base
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe, lift_apply_inr]
-- `ext` attribute should be lower priority then `hom_ext_nonempty`
@[ext 1199]
theorem hom_ext {f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _))
(hbase : f.comp (base φ) = g.comp (base φ)) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext
(CoprodI.ext_hom _ _ h)
hbase
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext_nonempty [hn : Nonempty ι]
{f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _)) : f = g :=
hom_ext h <| by
cases hn with
| intro i =>
ext
rw [← of_comp_eq_base i, ← MonoidHom.comp_assoc, h, MonoidHom.comp_assoc]
/-- The equivalence that is part of the universal property of the pushout. A hom out of
the pushout is just a morphism out of all groups in the pushout that satisfies a commutativity
condition. -/
@[simps]
def homEquiv :
(PushoutI φ →* K) ≃ { f : (Π i, G i →* K) × (H →* K) // ∀ i, (f.1 i).comp (φ i) = f.2 } :=
{ toFun := fun f => ⟨(fun i => f.comp (of i), f.comp (base φ)),
fun i => by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, of_comp_eq_base]⟩
invFun := fun f => lift f.1.1 f.1.2 f.2,
left_inv := fun _ => hom_ext (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
(by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, funext_iff] }
/-- The map from the coproduct into the pushout -/
def ofCoprodI : CoprodI G →* PushoutI φ :=
CoprodI.lift of
@[simp]
theorem ofCoprodI_of (i : ι) (g : G i) :
(ofCoprodI (CoprodI.of g) : PushoutI φ) = of i g := by
simp [ofCoprodI]
theorem induction_on {motive : PushoutI φ → Prop}
(x : PushoutI φ)
(of : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i), motive (of i g))
(base : ∀ h, motive (base φ h))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive x := by
delta PushoutI PushoutI.of PushoutI.base at *
induction x using Con.induction_on with
| H x =>
induction x using Coprod.induction_on with
| inl g =>
induction g using CoprodI.induction_on with
| of i g => exact of i g
| mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [map_mul]
exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
| one => simpa using base 1
| inr h => exact base h
| mul x y ihx ihy => exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
end Monoid
variable [∀ i, Group (G i)] [Group H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
instance : Group (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.group (PushoutI.con φ) with
toMonoid := PushoutI.monoid }
namespace NormalWord
/-
In this section we show that there is a normal form for words in the amalgamated product. To have a
normal form, we need to pick canonical choice of element of each right coset of the base group. The
choice of element in the base group itself is `1`. Given a choice of element of each right coset,
given by the type `Transversal φ` we can find a normal form. The normal form for an element is an
element of the base group, multiplied by a word in the coproduct, where each letter in the word is
the canonical choice of element of its coset. We then show that all groups in the diagram act
faithfully on the normal form. This implies that the maps into the coproduct are injective.
We demonstrate the action is faithful using the equivalence `equivPair`. We show that `G i` acts
faithfully on `Pair d i` and that `Pair d i` is isomorphic to `NormalWord d`. Here, `d` is a
`Transversal`. A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element
of the group `G i`, the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
We then show that the equivalence between `NormalWord` and `PushoutI`, between the set of normal
words and the elements of the amalgamated product. The key to this is the theorem `prod_smul_empty`,
which says that going from `NormalWord` to `PushoutI` and back is the identity. This is proven
by induction on the word using `consRecOn`.
-/
variable (φ)
/-- The data we need to pick a normal form for words in the pushout. We need to pick a
canonical element of each coset. We also need all the maps in the diagram to be injective -/
structure Transversal : Type _ where
/-- All maps in the diagram are injective -/
injective : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)
/-- The underlying set, containing exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
set : ∀ i, Set (G i)
/-- The chosen element of the base group itself is the identity -/
one_mem : ∀ i, 1 ∈ set i
/-- We have exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
compl : ∀ i, IsComplement (φ i).range (set i)
theorem transversal_nonempty (hφ : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)) : Nonempty (Transversal φ) := by
choose t ht using fun i => (φ i).range.exists_isComplement_right 1
apply Nonempty.intro
exact
{ injective := hφ
set := t
one_mem := fun i => (ht i).2
compl := fun i => (ht i).1 }
variable {φ}
/-- The normal form for words in the pushout. Every element of the pushout is the product of an
element of the base group and a word made up of letters each of which is in the transversal. -/
structure _root_.Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord (d : Transversal φ) extends CoprodI.Word G where
/-- Every `NormalWord` is the product of an element of the base group and a word made up
of letters each of which is in the transversal. `head` is that element of the base group. -/
head : H
/-- All letter in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ toList → g ∈ d.set i
/--
A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element of the group `G i`,
the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
Similar to `Monoid.CoprodI.Pair` except every letter must be in the transversal
(not including the head letter). -/
structure Pair (d : Transversal φ) (i : ι) extends CoprodI.Word.Pair G i where
/-- All letters in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ tail.toList → g ∈ d.set i
variable {d : Transversal φ}
/-- The empty normalized word, representing the identity element of the group. -/
@[simps!]
def empty : NormalWord d := ⟨CoprodI.Word.empty, 1, fun i g => by simp [CoprodI.Word.empty]⟩
instance : Inhabited (NormalWord d) := ⟨NormalWord.empty⟩
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair d i) :=
⟨{ (empty : NormalWord d) with
head := 1, tail := _,
fstIdx_ne := fun h => by cases h }⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (hhead : w₁.head = w₂.head)
(hlist : w₁.toList = w₂.toList) : w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
simp_all
open Subgroup.IsComplement
instance baseAction : MulAction H (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun h w => { w with head := h * w.head },
one_smul := by simp [instHSMul]
mul_smul := by simp [instHSMul, mul_assoc] }
theorem base_smul_def' (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := rfl
/-- Take the product of a normal word as an element of the `PushoutI`. We show that this is
bijective, in `NormalWord.equiv`. -/
def prod (w : NormalWord d) : PushoutI φ :=
base φ w.head * ofCoprodI (w.toWord).prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_base_smul (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
(h • w).prod = base φ h * w.prod := by
simp only [base_smul_def', prod, map_mul, mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : (empty : NormalWord d).prod = 1 := by
simp [prod, empty]
/-- A constructor that multiplies a `NormalWord` by an element, with condition to make
sure the underlying list does get longer. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def cons {i} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv (g * (φ i w.head))
letI w' := Word.cons (n.2 : G i) w.toWord hmw
(mt (coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem _ (d.one_mem _)).1
(mt (mul_mem_cancel_right (by simp)).1 hgr))
{ toWord := w'
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
simp only [w', Word.cons, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, hg | hg⟩
· simp
· exact w.normalized _ _ (by assumption) }
@[simp]
theorem prod_cons {i} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : (cons g w hmw hgr).prod = of i g * w.prod := by
simp [prod, cons, ← of_apply_eq_base φ i, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (G i)]
/-- Given a word in `CoprodI`, if every letter is in the transversal and when
we multiply by an element of the base group it still has this property,
then the element of the base group we multiplied by was one. -/
theorem eq_one_of_smul_normalized (w : CoprodI.Word G) {i : ι} (h : H)
(hw : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ w.toList → g ∈ d.set i)
(hφw : ∀ j g, ⟨j, g⟩ ∈ (CoprodI.of (φ i h) • w).toList → g ∈ d.set j) :
h = 1 := by
simp only [← (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (one_mem _)] at hw hφw
have hhead : ((d.compl i).equiv (Word.equivPair i w).head).2 =
(Word.equivPair i w).head := by
rw [Word.equivPair_head]
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hw _ _ (List.head_mem _)
· rw [equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _)]
by_contra hh1
have := hφw i (φ i h * (Word.equivPair i w).head) ?_
· apply hh1
rw [equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩, hhead] at this
simpa [((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] using this
· simp only [Word.mem_smul_iff, not_true, false_and, ne_eq, Option.mem_def, mul_right_inj,
exists_eq_right', mul_eq_left, exists_prop, true_and, false_or]
constructor
· intro h
apply_fun (d.compl i).equiv at h
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _),
equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩ , hhead, Subtype.ext_iff,
Prod.ext_iff, Subgroup.coe_mul] at h
rcases h with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [h₂, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _)] at h₁
erw [mul_one] at h₁
simp only [((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] at h₁
contradiction
· rw [Word.equivPair_head]
dsimp
split_ifs with hep
· rcases hep with ⟨hnil, rfl⟩
rw [head?_eq_head hnil]
simp_all
· push_neg at hep
by_cases hw : w.toList = []
· simp [hw, Word.fstIdx]
· simp [head?_eq_head hw, Word.fstIdx, hep hw]
theorem ext_smul {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (i : ι)
(h : CoprodI.of (φ i w₁.head) • w₁.toWord =
CoprodI.of (φ i w₂.head) • w₂.toWord) :
w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨w₁, h₁, hw₁⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨w₂, h₂, hw₂⟩
dsimp at *
rw [smul_eq_iff_eq_inv_smul, ← mul_smul] at h
subst h
simp only [← map_inv, ← map_mul] at hw₁
have : h₁⁻¹ * h₂ = 1 := eq_one_of_smul_normalized w₂ (h₁⁻¹ * h₂) hw₂ hw₁
rw [inv_mul_eq_one] at this; subst this
simp
/-- Given a pair `(head, tail)`, we can form a word by prepending `head` to `tail`, but
putting head into normal form first, by making sure it is expressed as an element
of the base group multiplied by an element of the transversal. -/
noncomputable def rcons (i : ι) (p : Pair d i) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv p.head
let w := (Word.equivPair i).symm { p.toPair with head := n.2 }
{ toWord := w
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
dsimp [w] at hg
rw [Word.equivPair_symm, Word.mem_rcons_iff] at hg
rcases hg with hg | ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact p.normalized _ _ hg
· simp }
theorem rcons_injective {i : ι} : Function.Injective (rcons (d := d) i) := by
rintro ⟨⟨head₁, tail₁⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨head₂, tail₂⟩, _⟩
simp only [rcons, NormalWord.mk.injEq, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq,
Word.Pair.mk.injEq, Pair.mk.injEq, and_imp]
intro h₁ h₂ h₃
subst h₂
rw [← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₁,
← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₂,
h₁, h₃]
simp
/-- The equivalence between `NormalWord`s and pairs. We can turn a `NormalWord` into a
pair by taking the head of the `List` if it is in `G i` and multiplying it by the element of the
base group. -/
noncomputable def equivPair (i) : NormalWord d ≃ Pair d i :=
letI toFun : NormalWord d → Pair d i :=
fun w =>
letI p := Word.equivPair i (CoprodI.of (φ i w.head) • w.toWord)
{ toPair := p
normalized := fun j g hg => by
dsimp only [p] at hg
rw [Word.of_smul_def, ← Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at hg
dsimp at hg
exact w.normalized _ _ (Word.mem_of_mem_equivPair_tail _ hg) }
haveI leftInv : Function.LeftInverse (rcons i) toFun :=
fun w => ext_smul i <| by
simp only [toFun, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm,
Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Word.rcons_eq_smul,
MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv,
mul_smul, inv_smul_smul, smul_inv_smul]
{ toFun := toFun
invFun := rcons i
left_inv := leftInv
right_inv := fun _ => rcons_injective (leftInv _) }
noncomputable instance summandAction (i : ι) : MulAction (G i) (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun g w => (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head }
one_smul := fun _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
rw [one_mul]
exact (equivPair i).symm_apply_apply _
mul_smul := fun _ _ _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
simp [mul_assoc, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, Function.End.mul_def] }
theorem summand_smul_def' {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
g • w = (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head } := rfl
noncomputable instance mulAction : MulAction (PushoutI φ) (NormalWord d) :=
MulAction.ofEndHom <|
lift
(fun _ => MulAction.toEndHom)
MulAction.toEndHom <| by
intro i
simp only [MulAction.toEndHom, DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MonoidHom.coe_mk,
OneHom.coe_mk, comp_apply]
intro h
funext w
apply NormalWord.ext_smul i
simp only [summand_smul_def', equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul,
Word.rcons_eq_smul, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, map_inv, mul_smul, inv_smul_smul,
smul_inv_smul, base_smul_def', MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm]
theorem base_smul_def (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
base φ h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := by
dsimp [NormalWord.mulAction, instHSMul, SMul.smul]
rw [lift_base]
rfl
theorem summand_smul_def {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
of (φ := φ) i g • w = (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head } := by
dsimp [NormalWord.mulAction, instHSMul, SMul.smul]
rw [lift_of]
rfl
theorem of_smul_eq_smul {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
of (φ := φ) i g • w = g • w := by
rw [summand_smul_def, summand_smul_def']
theorem base_smul_eq_smul (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
base φ h • w = h • w := by
rw [base_smul_def, base_smul_def']
/-- Induction principle for `NormalWord`, that corresponds closely to inducting on
the underlying list. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def consRecOn {motive : NormalWord d → Sort _} (w : NormalWord d)
(empty : motive empty)
(cons : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(_hgn : g ∈ d.set i) (hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) (_hw1 : w.head = 1),
motive w → motive (cons g w hmw hgr))
(base : ∀ (h : H) (w : NormalWord d), w.head = 1 → motive w → motive
(base φ h • w)) : motive w := by
rcases w with ⟨w, head, h3⟩
convert base head ⟨w, 1, h3⟩ rfl ?_
· simp [base_smul_def]
· induction w using Word.consRecOn with
| empty => exact empty
| cons i g w h1 hg1 ih =>
convert cons i g ⟨w, 1, fun _ _ h => h3 _ _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)⟩
h1 (h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self) ?_ rfl
(ih ?_)
· ext
simp only [Word.cons, Option.mem_def, NormalWord.cons, map_one, mul_one,
(equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
· apply d.injective i
simp only [NormalWord.cons, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm,
map_one, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel, (equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
· rwa [← SetLike.mem_coe,
← coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem (d.compl i) (d.one_mem _),
(equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
theorem cons_eq_smul {i : ι} (g : G i)
(w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : cons g w hmw hgr = of (φ := φ) i g • w := by
apply ext_smul i
simp only [cons, ne_eq, Word.cons_eq_smul, MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm,
equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv, mul_smul, inv_smul_smul, summand_smul_def,
equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm, Word.rcons_eq_smul, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, smul_inv_smul]
@[simp]
theorem prod_summand_smul {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod = of i g * w.prod := by
simp only [prod, summand_smul_def', equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Word.equivPair_smul_same,
Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Word.rcons_eq_smul, ← of_apply_eq_base φ i,
MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv,
Word.prod_smul, ofCoprodI_of, inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem prod_smul (g : PushoutI φ) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod = g * w.prod := by
induction g using PushoutI.induction_on generalizing w with
| of i g => rw [of_smul_eq_smul, prod_summand_smul]
| base h => rw [base_smul_eq_smul, prod_base_smul]
| mul x y ihx ihy => rw [mul_smul, ihx, ihy, mul_assoc]
theorem prod_smul_empty (w : NormalWord d) : w.prod • empty = w := by
induction w using consRecOn with
| empty => simp
| cons i g w _ _ _ _ ih =>
rw [prod_cons, mul_smul, ih, cons_eq_smul]
| base h w _ ih =>
rw [prod_smul, mul_smul, ih]
/-- The equivalence between normal forms and elements of the pushout -/
noncomputable def equiv : PushoutI φ ≃ NormalWord d :=
{ toFun := fun g => g • .empty
invFun := fun w => w.prod
left_inv := fun g => by
simp only [prod_smul, prod_empty, mul_one]
right_inv := fun w => prod_smul_empty w }
theorem prod_injective {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} [(i : ι) → Group (G i)] {φ : (i : ι) → H →* G i}
{d : Transversal φ} : Function.Injective (prod : NormalWord d → PushoutI φ) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
letI := fun i => Classical.decEq (G i)
classical exact equiv.symm.injective
instance : FaithfulSMul (PushoutI φ) (NormalWord d) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congr_arg prod (h empty)⟩
instance (i : ι) : FaithfulSMul (G i) (NormalWord d) :=
⟨by simp [summand_smul_def']⟩
instance : FaithfulSMul H (NormalWord d) :=
⟨by simp [base_smul_def']⟩
end NormalWord
open NormalWord
/-- All maps into the `PushoutI`, or amalgamated product of groups are injective,
provided all maps in the diagram are injective.
See also `base_injective` -/
theorem of_injective (hφ : ∀ i, Function.Injective (φ i)) (i : ι) :
Function.Injective (of (φ := φ) i) := by
rcases transversal_nonempty φ hφ with ⟨d⟩
let _ := Classical.decEq ι
let _ := fun i => Classical.decEq (G i)
refine Function.Injective.of_comp
(f := ((· • ·) : PushoutI φ → NormalWord d → NormalWord d)) ?_
intros _ _ h
exact eq_of_smul_eq_smul (fun w : NormalWord d =>
by simp_all [funext_iff, of_smul_eq_smul])
theorem base_injective (hφ : ∀ i, Function.Injective (φ i)) :
Function.Injective (base φ) := by
rcases transversal_nonempty φ hφ with ⟨d⟩
let _ := Classical.decEq ι
let _ := fun i => Classical.decEq (G i)
refine Function.Injective.of_comp
(f := ((· • ·) : PushoutI φ → NormalWord d → NormalWord d)) ?_
intros _ _ h
exact eq_of_smul_eq_smul (fun w : NormalWord d =>
by simp_all [funext_iff, base_smul_eq_smul])
section Reduced
open NormalWord
variable (φ) in
/-- A word in `CoprodI` is reduced if none of its letters are in the base group. -/
def Reduced (w : Word G) : Prop :=
∀ g, g ∈ w.toList → g.2 ∉ (φ g.1).range
theorem Reduced.exists_normalWord_prod_eq (d : Transversal φ) {w : Word G} (hw : Reduced φ w) :
∃ w' : NormalWord d, w'.prod = ofCoprodI w.prod ∧
w'.toList.map Sigma.fst = w.toList.map Sigma.fst := by
classical
induction w using Word.consRecOn with
| empty => exact ⟨empty, by simp, rfl⟩
| cons i g w hIdx hg1 ih =>
rcases ih (fun _ hg => hw _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg)) with
⟨w', hw'prod, hw'map⟩
refine ⟨cons g w' ?_ ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Word.fstIdx, ← List.head?_map, hw'map, List.head?_map]
· exact hw _ List.mem_cons_self
· simp [hw'prod, hw'map]
/-- For any word `w` in the coproduct,
if `w` is reduced (i.e none its letters are in the image of the base monoid), and nonempty, then
`w` itself is not in the image of the base group. -/
theorem Reduced.eq_empty_of_mem_range
(hφ : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)) {w : Word G} (hw : Reduced φ w)
(h : ofCoprodI w.prod ∈ (base φ).range) : w = .empty := by
rcases transversal_nonempty φ hφ with ⟨d⟩
rcases hw.exists_normalWord_prod_eq d with ⟨w', hw'prod, hw'map⟩
rcases h with ⟨h, heq⟩
have : (NormalWord.prod (d := d) ⟨.empty, h, by simp⟩) = base φ h := by
simp [NormalWord.prod]
rw [← hw'prod, ← this] at heq
suffices w'.toWord = .empty by
simp [this, @eq_comm _ []] at hw'map
ext
simp [hw'map]
rw [← prod_injective heq]
end Reduced
/-- The intersection of the images of the maps from any two distinct groups in the diagram
into the amalgamated product is the image of the map from the base group in the diagram. -/
theorem inf_of_range_eq_base_range
(hφ : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
(of i).range ⊓ (of j).range = (base φ).range :=
le_antisymm
(by
intro x ⟨⟨g₁, hg₁⟩, ⟨g₂, hg₂⟩⟩
by_contra hx
| have hx1 : x ≠ 1 := by rintro rfl; simp_all only [ne_eq, one_mem, not_true_eq_false]
have hg₁1 : g₁ ≠ 1 :=
ne_of_apply_ne (of (φ := φ) i) (by simp_all)
have hg₂1 : g₂ ≠ 1 :=
ne_of_apply_ne (of (φ := φ) j) (by simp_all)
have hg₁r : g₁ ∉ (φ i).range := by
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
subst hg₁
exact hx (of_apply_eq_base φ i y ▸ MonoidHom.mem_range.2 ⟨y, rfl⟩)
have hg₂r : g₂ ∉ (φ j).range := by
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
subst hg₂
exact hx (of_apply_eq_base φ j y ▸ MonoidHom.mem_range.2 ⟨y, rfl⟩)
let w : Word G := ⟨[⟨_, g₁⟩, ⟨_, g₂⁻¹⟩], by simp_all, by simp_all⟩
have hw : Reduced φ w := by
simp only [w, not_exists, ne_eq, Reduced, List.find?, List.mem_cons,
List.mem_singleton, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_eq_true, forall_const, forall_eq,
true_and, hg₁r, hg₂r, List.mem_nil_iff, false_imp_iff, imp_true_iff, and_true,
inv_mem_iff]
have := hw.eq_empty_of_mem_range hφ (by
simp only [w, Word.prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil,
List.map_nil, map_mul, ofCoprodI_of, hg₁, hg₂, map_inv, map_one, mul_one,
mul_inv_cancel, one_mem])
simp [w, Word.empty] at this)
(le_inf
(by rw [← of_comp_eq_base i]
rintro _ ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact MonoidHom.mem_range.2 ⟨φ i h, rfl⟩)
(by rw [← of_comp_eq_base j]
rintro _ ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact MonoidHom.mem_range.2 ⟨φ j h, rfl⟩))
end PushoutI
end Monoid
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PushoutI.lean | 662 | 697 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Completeness in terms of `Cauchy` filters vs `isCauSeq` sequences
In this file we apply `Metric.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto` to prove that a `NormedRing`
is complete in terms of `Cauchy` filter if and only if it is complete in terms
of `CauSeq` Cauchy sequences.
-/
universe u v
open Set Filter Topology
variable {β : Type v}
theorem CauSeq.tendsto_limit [NormedRing β] [hn : IsAbsoluteValue (norm : β → ℝ)]
(f : CauSeq β norm) [CauSeq.IsComplete β norm] : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 f.lim) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr
(by
intro s os lfs
suffices ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → f b ∈ s by simpa using this
rcases Metric.isOpen_iff.1 os _ lfs with ⟨ε, ⟨hε, hεs⟩⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := Setoid.symm (CauSeq.equiv_lim f) _ hε
exists N
intro b hb
apply hεs
dsimp [Metric.ball]
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
solve_by_elim)
variable [NormedField β]
/-
This section shows that if we have a uniform space generated by an absolute value, topological
completeness and Cauchy sequence completeness coincide. The problem is that there isn't
a good notion of "uniform space generated by an absolute value", so right now this is
specific to norm. Furthermore, norm only instantiates IsAbsoluteValue on NormedDivisionRing.
This needs to be fixed, since it prevents showing that ℤ_[hp] is complete.
-/
open Metric
theorem CauchySeq.isCauSeq {f : ℕ → β} (hf : CauchySeq f) : IsCauSeq norm f := by
obtain ⟨hf1, hf2⟩ := cauchy_iff.1 hf
intro ε hε
rcases hf2 { x | dist x.1 x.2 < ε } (dist_mem_uniformity hε) with ⟨t, ⟨ht, htsub⟩⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, mem_preimage] at ht; obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := ht
exists N
intro j hj
rw [← dist_eq_norm]
apply @htsub (f j, f N)
apply Set.mk_mem_prod <;> solve_by_elim [le_refl]
theorem CauSeq.cauchySeq (f : CauSeq β norm) : CauchySeq f := by
refine cauchy_iff.2 ⟨by infer_instance, fun s hs => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hs with ⟨ε, ⟨hε, hεs⟩⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
exists { n | n ≥ N }.image f
simp only [exists_prop, mem_atTop_sets, mem_map, mem_image, mem_setOf_eq]
constructor
| · exists N
intro b hb
exists b
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨a', ⟨ha'1, ha'2⟩⟩, ⟨b', ⟨hb'1, hb'2⟩⟩⟩
dsimp at ha'1 ha'2 hb'1 hb'2
rw [← ha'2, ← hb'2]
apply hεs
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply hN <;> assumption
/-- In a normed field, `CauSeq` coincides with the usual notion of Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem isCauSeq_iff_cauchySeq {α : Type u} [NormedField α] {u : ℕ → α} :
IsCauSeq norm u ↔ CauchySeq u :=
⟨fun h => CauSeq.cauchySeq ⟨u, h⟩, fun h => h.isCauSeq⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/CauSeqFilter.lean | 67 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ choice) using Lean's underlying type theory,
building on the pre-sets defined in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet`.
The theory of classes is developed in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Class`.
## Main definitions
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
* `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `Set`.
* `Classical.allZFSetDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
-/
universe u
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
namespace ZFSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary `PSet`
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class Definable (n) (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) where
/-- Turns a definable function into an n-ary `PSet` function. -/
out : (Fin n → PSet.{u}) → PSet.{u}
/-- A set function `f` is the image of `Definable.out f`. -/
mk_out xs : mk (out xs) = f (mk <| xs ·) := by simp
attribute [simp] Definable.mk_out
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for unary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₁ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 1 (fun s ↦ f (s 0))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₁`. -/
abbrev Definable₁.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x, ⟦out x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧) :
Definable₁ f where
out xs := out (xs 0)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0)
/-- Turns a unary definable function into a unary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₁.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0)) ![x]
lemma Definable₁.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f]
{x : PSet} :
.mk (out f x) = f (.mk x) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x]
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for binary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₂ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 2 (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₂`. -/
abbrev Definable₂.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x y, ⟦out x y⟧ = f ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧) :
Definable₂ f where
out xs := out (xs 0) (xs 1)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0) (xs 1)
/-- Turns a binary definable function into a binary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₂.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x y ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1)) ![x, y]
lemma Definable₂.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₂ f]
{x y : PSet} :
.mk (out f x y) = f (.mk x) (.mk y) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x, y]
instance (f) [Definable₁ f] (n g) [Definable n g] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g s)) where
out xs := Definable₁.out f (Definable.out g xs)
instance (f) [Definable₂ f] (n g₁ g₂) [Definable n g₁] [Definable n g₂] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g₁ s) (g₂ s)) where
out xs := Definable₂.out f (Definable.out g₁ xs) (Definable.out g₂ xs)
instance (n) (i) : Definable n (fun s ↦ s i) where
out s := s i
lemma Definable.out_equiv {n} (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable n f]
{xs ys : Fin n → PSet} (h : ∀ i, xs i ≈ ys i) :
out f xs ≈ out f ys := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_iff_equiv, mk_eq, mk_eq, mk_out, mk_out]
exact congrArg _ (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.sound (h i))
lemma Definable₁.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f]
{x y : PSet} (h : x ≈ y) :
out f x ≈ out f y :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [h])
lemma Definable₂.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f]
{x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PSet} (h₁ : x₁ ≈ y₁) (h₂ : x₂ ≈ y₂) :
out f x₁ x₂ ≈ out f y₁ y₂ :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [Fin.forall_fin_succ, h₁, h₂])
end ZFSet
namespace Classical
open PSet ZFSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allZFSetDefinable {n} (F : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) : Definable n F where
out xs := (F (mk <| xs ·)).out
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ (· ∈ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet where
mem t s := ZFSet.Mem s t
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hb
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
simp [ZFSet.ext_iff]
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map₂ PSet.insert
fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun _ _ _ => PSet.mem_insert_iff.trans (or_congr_left eq.symm)
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_singleton.trans eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton (x : ZFSet) : {x, x} = ({x} : ZFSet) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x, y} : ZFSet) = {z} ↔ x = z ∧ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← mem_singleton]
simp [← h]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact pair_eq_singleton y
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_pair_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y, z} ↔ x = y ∧ x = z := by
rw [eq_comm, pair_eq_singleton_iff]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map (PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y))
fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
PSet.mem_sep (p := p ∘ mk) fun _ _ h => (Quotient.sound h).subst
@[simp]
theorem sep_empty (p : ZFSet → Prop) : (∅ : ZFSet).sep p = ∅ :=
(eq_empty _).mpr fun _ h ↦ not_mem_empty _ (mem_sep.mp h).1
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.powerset
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_powerset.trans subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
obtain ⟨γδ, δγ⟩ := hb
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.sUnion
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
define `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := (⋃₀ x).sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z)
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_sUnion.trans
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
unfold sInter
simp only [and_iff_right_iff_imp, mem_sep]
intro mem
apply mem_sUnion.mpr
replace ⟨s, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, h, mem _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := by simp [sInter]
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
instance : IsWellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨mem_wf⟩
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm_of (· ∈ ·)
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl_of (· ∈ ·) x
theorem not_subset_of_mem {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ y) : ¬ y ⊆ x :=
fun h' ↦ mem_irrefl _ (h' h)
theorem not_mem_of_subset {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ⊆ y) : y ∉ x :=
imp_not_comm.2 not_subset_of_mem h
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let r := Definable₁.out f
Quotient.map (PSet.image r)
fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).symm
theorem image.mk (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] (x) {y} : y ∈ x → f y ∈ image f x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => by
simp only [mk_eq, ← Definable₁.mk_out (f := f)]
exact ⟨a, Definable₁.out_equiv f ya⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_image {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, ((Quotient.sound ya).trans Definable₁.mk_out).symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ => e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
/-- The range of a type-indexed family of sets. -/
noncomputable def range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⟦⟨_, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ (equivShrink α).symm⟩⟧
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α} [Small.{u} α] {f : α → ZFSet.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} :
x ∈ range f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨(equivShrink α).symm z, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use equivShrink α z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) :
(range f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
(powerset (powerset (x ∪ y))).sep fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := by
intro x x' y y' H
simp_rw [ZFSet.ext_iff, pair, mem_pair] at H
obtain rfl : x = x' := And.left <| by simpa [or_and_left] using (H {x}).1 (Or.inl rfl)
have he : y = x → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
simpa [eq_comm] using H {y, y'}
have hx := H {x, y}
simp_rw [pair_eq_singleton_iff, true_and, or_true, true_iff] at hx
refine ⟨rfl, hx.elim he fun hy ↦ Or.elim ?_ he id⟩
simpa using ZFSet.ext_iff.1 hy y
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
instance : Definable₁ ({·}) := .mk ({·}) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ insert := .mk insert (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ pair := by unfold pair; infer_instance
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,067 | 1,069 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
/-!
# Lemmas about rings of characteristic two
This file contains results about `CharP R 2`, in the `CharTwo` namespace.
The lemmas in this file with a `_sq` suffix are just special cases of the `_pow_char` lemmas
elsewhere, with a shorter name for ease of discovery, and no need for a `[Fact (Prime 2)]` argument.
-/
assert_not_exists Algebra LinearMap
variable {R ι : Type*}
namespace CharTwo
section AddMonoidWithOne
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R]
theorem two_eq_zero [CharP R 2] : (2 : R) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
/-- The only hypotheses required to build a `CharP R 2` instance are `1 ≠ 0` and `2 = 0`. -/
theorem of_one_ne_zero_of_two_eq_zero (h₁ : (1 : R) ≠ 0) (h₂ : (2 : R) = 0) : CharP R 2 where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by
obtain hn | hn := Nat.even_or_odd n
· simp_rw [hn.two_dvd, iff_true]
exact natCast_eq_zero_of_even_of_two_eq_zero hn h₂
· simp_rw [hn.not_two_dvd_nat, iff_false]
rwa [natCast_eq_one_of_odd_of_two_eq_zero hn h₂]
end AddMonoidWithOne
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [CharP R 2]
@[scoped simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero (x : R) : x + x = 0 := by rw [← two_smul R x, two_eq_zero, zero_smul]
@[scoped simp]
protected theorem two_nsmul (x : R) : 2 • x = 0 := by rw [two_smul, add_self_eq_zero]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [CharP R 2]
@[scoped simp]
theorem neg_eq (x : R) : -x = x := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero]
theorem neg_eq' : Neg.neg = (id : R → R) :=
funext neg_eq
@[scoped simp]
theorem sub_eq_add (x y : R) : x - y = x + y := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_eq]
@[deprecated sub_eq_add (since := "2024-10-24")]
theorem sub_eq_add' : HSub.hSub = (· + · : R → R → R) :=
funext₂ sub_eq_add
theorem add_eq_iff_eq_add {a b c : R} : a + b = c ↔ a = c + b := by
rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_eq_add]
theorem eq_add_iff_add_eq {a b c : R} : a = b + c ↔ a + c = b := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_eq_add]
@[scoped simp]
protected theorem two_zsmul (x : R) : (2 : ℤ) • x = 0 := by
rw [two_zsmul, add_self_eq_zero]
end Ring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CharP R 2]
theorem add_sq (x y : R) : (x + y) ^ 2 = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 :=
add_pow_char _ _ _
theorem add_mul_self (x y : R) : (x + y) * (x + y) = x * x + y * y := by
rw [← pow_two, ← pow_two, ← pow_two, add_sq]
theorem list_sum_sq (l : List R) : l.sum ^ 2 = (l.map (· ^ 2)).sum :=
list_sum_pow_char _ _
theorem list_sum_mul_self (l : List R) : l.sum * l.sum = (List.map (fun x => x * x) l).sum := by
simp_rw [← pow_two, list_sum_sq]
theorem multiset_sum_sq (l : Multiset R) : l.sum ^ 2 = (l.map (· ^ 2)).sum :=
multiset_sum_pow_char _ _
theorem multiset_sum_mul_self (l : Multiset R) :
l.sum * l.sum = (Multiset.map (fun x => x * x) l).sum := by simp_rw [← pow_two, multiset_sum_sq]
theorem sum_sq (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ 2 = ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ 2 :=
sum_pow_char _ _ _
theorem sum_mul_self (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i * f i := by simp_rw [← pow_two, sum_sq]
end CommSemiring
end CharTwo
|
section ringChar
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/Two.lean | 115 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.Basic
/-!
# Legendre symbol
This file contains results about Legendre symbols.
We define the Legendre symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$ as `legendreSym p a`.
Note the order of arguments! The advantage of this form is that then `legendreSym p`
is a multiplicative map.
The Legendre symbol is used to define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a`
and (odd) natural numbers `b`, which extends the Legendre symbol.
## Main results
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `-1`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_neg_one` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff` for `-1`.
See `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity` for the conditions when `2` and `-2`
are squares:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2`,
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol
-/
open Nat
section Euler
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- Euler's Criterion: A unit `x` of `ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion_units (x : (ZMod p)ˣ) : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ x ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
by_cases hc : p = 2
· subst hc
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
· have h₀ := FiniteField.unit_isSquare_iff (by rwa [ringChar_zmod_n]) x
have hs : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ IsSquare x := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq x]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
rw [hs]
rwa [card p] at h₀
/-- Euler's Criterion: a nonzero `a : ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) : IsSquare (a : ZMod p) ↔ a ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
apply (iff_congr _ (by simp [Units.ext_iff])).mp (euler_criterion_units p (Units.mk0 a ha))
simp only [Units.ext_iff, sq, Units.val_mk0, Units.val_mul]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩; exact ⟨y, hy.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [zero_pow, mul_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
refine ⟨Units.mk0 y hy, ?_⟩; simp
/-- If `a : ZMod p` is nonzero, then `a^(p/2)` is either `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a ^ (p / 2) = 1 ∨ a ^ (p / 2) = -1 := by
rcases Prime.eq_two_or_odd (@Fact.out p.Prime _) with hp2 | hp_odd
· subst p; revert a ha; intro a; fin_cases a
· tauto
· simp
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← pow_add, ← two_mul, two_mul_odd_div_two hp_odd]
exact pow_card_sub_one_eq_one ha
end ZMod
end Euler
section Legendre
/-!
### Definition of the Legendre symbol and basic properties
-/
open ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a : ℤ` and a prime `p`, `legendreSym p a`,
is an integer defined as
* `0` if `a` is `0` modulo `p`;
* `1` if `a` is a nonzero square modulo `p`
* `-1` otherwise.
Note the order of the arguments! The advantage of the order chosen here is
that `legendreSym p` is a multiplicative function `ℤ → ℤ`.
-/
def legendreSym (a : ℤ) : ℤ :=
quadraticChar (ZMod p) a
namespace legendreSym
/-- We have the congruence `legendreSym p a ≡ a ^ (p / 2) mod p`. -/
theorem eq_pow (a : ℤ) : (legendreSym p a : ZMod p) = (a : ZMod p) ^ (p / 2) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (ringChar (ZMod p)) 2 with hc | hc
· by_cases ha : (a : ZMod p) = 0
· rw [legendreSym, ha, quadraticChar_zero,
zero_pow (Nat.div_pos (@Fact.out p.Prime).two_le (succ_pos 1)).ne']
norm_cast
· have := (ringChar_zmod_n p).symm.trans hc
-- p = 2
subst p
rw [legendreSym, quadraticChar_eq_one_of_char_two hc ha]
revert ha
push_cast
generalize (a : ZMod 2) = b; fin_cases b
· tauto
· simp
· convert quadraticChar_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two' hc (a : ZMod p)
exact (card p).symm
/-- If `p ∤ a`, then `legendreSym p a` is `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ∨ legendreSym p a = -1 :=
quadraticChar_dichotomy ha
theorem eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬legendreSym p a = 1 :=
quadraticChar_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one ha
/-- The Legendre symbol of `p` and `a` is zero iff `p ∣ a`. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = 0 ↔ (a : ZMod p) = 0 :=
quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem at_zero : legendreSym p 0 = 0 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_zero, MulChar.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem at_one : legendreSym p 1 = 1 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_one, MulChar.map_one]
/-- The Legendre symbol is multiplicative in `a` for `p` fixed. -/
protected theorem mul (a b : ℤ) : legendreSym p (a * b) = legendreSym p a * legendreSym p b := by
simp [legendreSym, Int.cast_mul, map_mul, quadraticCharFun_mul]
/-- The Legendre symbol is a homomorphism of monoids with zero. -/
@[simps]
def hom : ℤ →*₀ ℤ where
toFun := legendreSym p
map_zero' := at_zero p
map_one' := at_one p
map_mul' := legendreSym.mul p
/-- The square of the symbol is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a ^ 2 = 1 :=
quadraticChar_sq_one ha
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a^2` at `p` is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p (a ^ 2) = 1 := by
dsimp only [legendreSym]
rw [Int.cast_pow]
exact quadraticChar_sq_one' ha
/-- The Legendre symbol depends only on `a` mod `p`. -/
protected theorem mod (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = legendreSym p (a % p) := by
simp only [legendreSym, intCast_mod]
/-- When `p ∤ a`, then `legendreSym p a = 1` iff `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
theorem eq_one_iff {a : ℤ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_one_iff_isSquare ha0
theorem eq_one_iff' {a : ℕ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [eq_one_iff]
· norm_cast
· exact mod_cast ha0
/-- `legendreSym p a = -1` iff `a` is a nonsquare mod `p`. -/
theorem eq_neg_one_iff {a : ℤ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_neg_one_iff_not_isSquare
theorem eq_neg_one_iff' {a : ℕ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [eq_neg_one_iff]; norm_cast
/-- The number of square roots of `a` modulo `p` is determined by the Legendre symbol. -/
theorem card_sqrts (hp : p ≠ 2) (a : ℤ) :
↑{x : ZMod p | x ^ 2 = a}.toFinset.card = legendreSym p a + 1 :=
quadraticChar_card_sqrts ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp) a
end legendreSym
end Legendre
section QuadraticForm
/-!
### Applications to binary quadratic forms
-/
namespace legendreSym
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `y ≠ 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0)
{x y : ZMod p} (hy : y ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 := by
apply_fun (· * y⁻¹ ^ 2) at hxy
simp only [zero_mul] at hxy
rw [(by ring : (x ^ 2 - ↑a * y ^ 2) * y⁻¹ ^ 2 = (x * y⁻¹) ^ 2 - a * (y * y⁻¹) ^ 2),
mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_pow, mul_one, sub_eq_zero, pow_two] at hxy
exact (eq_one_iff p ha).mpr ⟨x * y⁻¹, hxy.symm⟩
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0)
{x y : ZMod p} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 := by
haveI hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_pow two_ne_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, sq_eq_zero_iff] at hxy
exact hx hxy
exact eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy
/-- If `legendreSym p a = -1`, then the only solution of `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` in `ℤ/pℤ`
is the trivial one. -/
theorem eq_zero_mod_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : legendreSym p a = -1)
{x y : ZMod p} (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
have ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0 := by
intro hf
rw [(eq_zero_iff p a).mpr hf] at h
simp at h
by_contra hf
rcases imp_iff_or_not.mp (not_and'.mp hf) with hx | hy
· rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' ha hx hxy, CharZero.eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
· rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy, CharZero.eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
/-- If `legendreSym p a = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide `x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : legendreSym p a = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : (p : ℤ) ∣ x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
simp_rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at hxy ⊢
push_cast at hxy
exact eq_zero_mod_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
end legendreSym
end QuadraticForm
| section Values
/-!
### The value of the Legendre symbol at `-1`
See `jacobiSym.at_neg_one` for the corresponding statement for the Jacobi symbol.
-/
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
open ZMod
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/Basic.lean | 254 | 265 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
/-!
# Probability mass functions
This file is about probability mass functions or discrete probability measures:
a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` such that the values have (infinite) sum `1`.
Construction of monadic `pure` and `bind` is found in `ProbabilityMassFunction/Monad.lean`,
other constructions of `PMF`s are found in `ProbabilityMassFunction/Constructions.lean`.
Given `p : PMF α`, `PMF.toOuterMeasure` constructs an `OuterMeasure` on `α`,
by assigning each set the sum of the probabilities of each of its elements.
Under this outer measure, every set is Carathéodory-measurable,
so we can further extend this to a `Measure` on `α`, see `PMF.toMeasure`.
`PMF.toMeasure.isProbabilityMeasure` shows this associated measure is a probability measure.
Conversely, given a probability measure `μ` on a measurable space `α` with all singleton sets
measurable, `μ.toPMF` constructs a `PMF` on `α`, setting the probability mass of a point `x`
to be the measure of the singleton set `{x}`.
## Tags
probability mass function, discrete probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
variable {α : Type*}
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
/-- A probability mass function, or discrete probability measures is a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` such
that the values have (infinite) sum `1`. -/
def PMF.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : α → ℝ≥0∞ // HasSum f 1 }
namespace PMF
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PMF α) α ℝ≥0∞ where
coe p a := p.1 a
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq h
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {p q : PMF α} (h : ∀ x, p x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
theorem hasSum_coe_one (p : PMF α) : HasSum p 1 :=
p.2
@[simp]
theorem tsum_coe (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a = 1 :=
p.hasSum_coe_one.tsum_eq
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a ≠ ∞ :=
p.tsum_coe.symm ▸ ENNReal.one_ne_top
theorem tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top (p : PMF α) (s : Set α) : ∑' a, s.indicator p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum (fun _ => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl))
(lt_of_le_of_ne le_top p.tsum_coe_ne_top))
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_zero (p : PMF α) : ⇑p ≠ 0 := fun hp =>
zero_ne_one ((tsum_zero.symm.trans (tsum_congr fun x => symm (congr_fun hp x))).trans p.tsum_coe)
/-- The support of a `PMF` is the set where it is nonzero. -/
def support (p : PMF α) : Set α :=
Function.support p
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : a ∈ p.support ↔ p a ≠ 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty (p : PMF α) : p.support.Nonempty :=
Function.support_nonempty_iff.2 p.coe_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_countable (p : PMF α) : p.support.Countable :=
Summable.countable_support_ennreal (tsum_coe_ne_top p)
theorem apply_eq_zero_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 0 ↔ a ∉ p.support := by
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not]
theorem apply_pos_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : 0 < p a ↔ a ∈ p.support :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans (p.mem_support_iff a).symm
theorem apply_eq_one_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 1 ↔ p.support = {a} := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.Subset.antisymm (fun a' ha' => by_contra fun ha => ?_)
fun a' ha' => ha'.symm ▸ (p.mem_support_iff a).2 fun ha => zero_ne_one <| ha.symm.trans h,
fun h => _root_.trans (symm <| tsum_eq_single a
fun a' ha' => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a').2 (h.symm ▸ ha')) p.tsum_coe⟩
suffices 1 < ∑' a, p a from ne_of_lt this p.tsum_coe.symm
classical
have : 0 < ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := lt_of_le_of_ne' zero_le'
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_ne_zero_iff.2
⟨a', ite_ne_left_iff.2 ⟨ha, Ne.symm <| (p.mem_support_iff a').2 ha'⟩⟩)
calc
1 = 1 + 0 := (add_zero 1).symm
_ < p a + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) :=
(ENNReal.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ENNReal.one_ne_top (le_of_eq h.symm) this)
_ = ite (a = a) (p a) 0 + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by rw [eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
_ = (∑' b, ite (b = a) (p b) 0) + ∑' b, ite (b = a) 0 (p b) := by
congr
exact symm (tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => if_neg hb)
_ = ∑' b, (ite (b = a) (p b) 0 + ite (b = a) 0 (p b)) := ENNReal.tsum_add.symm
_ = ∑' b, p b := tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_add, add_zero, le_rfl]
theorem coe_le_one (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≤ 1 := by
classical
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) (hasSum_ite_eq a (p a)) (hasSum_coe_one p)
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h, zero_le', le_rfl]
theorem apply_ne_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (p.coe_le_one a) ENNReal.one_lt_top)
theorem apply_lt_top (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (p.apply_ne_top a)
section OuterMeasure
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure
/-- Construct an `OuterMeasure` from a `PMF`, by assigning measure to each set `s : Set α` equal
to the sum of `p x` for each `x ∈ α`. -/
def toOuterMeasure (p : PMF α) : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.sum fun x : α => p x • dirac x
variable (p : PMF α) (s : Set α)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator p x :=
tsum_congr fun x => smul_dirac_apply (p x) x s
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_caratheodory : p.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.2 <| le_trans (le_sInf fun x hx => ?_) (le_sum_caratheodory _)
have ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
exact
((le_of_eq (dirac_caratheodory y).symm).trans (le_smul_caratheodory _ _)).trans (le_of_eq hy)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_finset (s : Finset α) : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑ x ∈ s, p x := by
refine (toOuterMeasure_apply p s).trans ((tsum_eq_sum (s := s) ?_).trans ?_)
· exact fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_not_mem (Finset.mem_coe.not.2 hx) _
· exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hx) _
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton (a : α) : p.toOuterMeasure {a} = p a := by
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply {a}).trans ((tsum_eq_single a fun b hb => ?_).trans ?_)
· classical exact ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun hb' => False.elim <| hb hb'
· classical exact ite_eq_left_iff.2 fun ha' => False.elim <| ha' rfl
theorem toOuterMeasure_injective : (toOuterMeasure : PMF α → OuterMeasure α).Injective :=
fun p q h => PMF.ext fun x => (p.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x).symm.trans
((congr_fun (congr_arg _ h) _).trans <| q.toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton x)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_inj {p q : PMF α} : p.toOuterMeasure = q.toOuterMeasure ↔ p = q :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.eq_iff
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 0 ↔ Disjoint p.support s := by
rw [toOuterMeasure_apply, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero]
exact funext_iff.symm.trans Set.indicator_eq_zero'
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_one_iff : p.toOuterMeasure s = 1 ↔ p.support ⊆ s := by
refine (p.toOuterMeasure_apply s).symm ▸ ⟨fun h a hap => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine by_contra fun hs => ne_of_lt ?_ (h.trans p.tsum_coe.symm)
have hs' : s.indicator p a = 0 := Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hs' => False.elim <| hs hs'
have hsa : s.indicator p a < p a := hs'.symm ▸ (p.apply_pos_iff a).2 hap
exact ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum (p.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top s)
(fun x => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl) hsa
· classical suffices ∀ (x) (_ : x ∉ s), p x = 0 from
_root_.trans (tsum_congr
fun a => (Set.indicator_apply s p a).trans
(ite_eq_left_iff.2 <| symm ∘ this a)) p.tsum_coe
exact fun a ha => (p.apply_eq_zero_iff a).2 <| Set.not_mem_subset h ha
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_inter_support :
p.toOuterMeasure (s ∩ p.support) = p.toOuterMeasure s := by
simp only [toOuterMeasure_apply, PMF.support, Set.indicator_inter_support]
/-- Slightly stronger than `OuterMeasure.mono` having an intersection with `p.support`. -/
theorem toOuterMeasure_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ p.support ⊆ t) :
p.toOuterMeasure s ≤ p.toOuterMeasure t :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (toOuterMeasure_apply_inter_support p s).symm) (p.toOuterMeasure.mono h)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_of_inter_support_eq {s t : Set α}
(h : s ∩ p.support = t ∩ p.support) : p.toOuterMeasure s = p.toOuterMeasure t :=
le_antisymm (p.toOuterMeasure_mono (h.symm ▸ Set.inter_subset_left))
(p.toOuterMeasure_mono (h ▸ Set.inter_subset_left))
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_fintype [Fintype α] : p.toOuterMeasure s = ∑ x, s.indicator p x :=
(p.toOuterMeasure_apply s).trans (tsum_eq_sum fun x h => absurd (Finset.mem_univ x) h)
end OuterMeasure
section Measure
open MeasureTheory
/-- Since every set is Carathéodory-measurable under `PMF.toOuterMeasure`,
we can further extend this `OuterMeasure` to a `Measure` on `α`. -/
def toMeasure [MeasurableSpace α] (p : PMF α) : Measure α :=
p.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure ((toOuterMeasure_caratheodory p).symm ▸ le_top)
variable [MeasurableSpace α] (p : PMF α) (s : Set α)
theorem toOuterMeasure_apply_le_toMeasure_apply : p.toOuterMeasure s ≤ p.toMeasure s :=
le_toMeasure_apply p.toOuterMeasure _ s
theorem toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
p.toMeasure s = p.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply p.toOuterMeasure _ hs
theorem toMeasure_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : p.toMeasure s = ∑' x, s.indicator p x :=
(p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply s hs).trans (p.toOuterMeasure_apply s)
theorem toMeasure_apply_singleton (a : α) (h : MeasurableSet ({a} : Set α)) :
p.toMeasure {a} = p a := by
simp [toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ _ h, toOuterMeasure_apply_singleton]
theorem toMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
p.toMeasure s = 0 ↔ Disjoint p.support s := by
rw [toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply p s hs, toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toMeasure_apply_eq_one_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) : p.toMeasure s = 1 ↔ p.support ⊆ s :=
(p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply s hs).symm ▸ p.toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_one_iff s
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply_inter_support (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hp : MeasurableSet p.support) :
p.toMeasure (s ∩ p.support) = p.toMeasure s := by
simp [p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply s hs,
p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ (hs.inter hp)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_toMeasure_support [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (p : PMF α) :
Measure.restrict (toMeasure p) (support p) = toMeasure p := by
ext s hs
apply (MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_apply hs).trans
apply toMeasure_apply_inter_support p s hs p.support_countable.measurableSet
theorem toMeasure_mono {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : s ∩ p.support ⊆ t) : p.toMeasure s ≤ p.toMeasure t := by
simpa only [p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply, hs, ht] using toOuterMeasure_mono p h
theorem toMeasure_apply_eq_of_inter_support_eq {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h : s ∩ p.support = t ∩ p.support) : p.toMeasure s = p.toMeasure t := by
simpa only [p.toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply, hs, ht] using
toOuterMeasure_apply_eq_of_inter_support_eq p h
section MeasurableSingletonClass
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
theorem toMeasure_injective : (toMeasure : PMF α → Measure α).Injective := by
intro p q h
ext x
rw [← p.toMeasure_apply_singleton x <| measurableSet_singleton x,
← q.toMeasure_apply_singleton x <| measurableSet_singleton x, h]
@[simp]
| theorem toMeasure_inj {p q : PMF α} : p.toMeasure = q.toMeasure ↔ p = q :=
toMeasure_injective.eq_iff
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Basic.lean | 269 | 271 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Discrete.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
/-!
# Binary (co)products
We define a category `WalkingPair`, which is the index category
for a binary (co)product diagram. A convenience method `pair X Y`
constructs the functor from the walking pair, hitting the given objects.
We define `prod X Y` and `coprod X Y` as limits and colimits of such functors.
Typeclasses `HasBinaryProducts` and `HasBinaryCoproducts` assert the existence
of (co)limits shaped as walking pairs.
We include lemmas for simplifying equations involving projections and coprojections, and define
braiding and associating isomorphisms, and the product comparison morphism.
## References
* [Stacks: Products of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001R)
* [Stacks: coproducts of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AN)
-/
universe v v₁ u u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a binary (co)product. -/
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open WalkingPair
/-- The equivalence swapping left and right.
-/
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun
| left => right
| right => left
invFun
| left => right
| right => left
left_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
right_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
/-- An equivalence from `WalkingPair` to `Bool`, sometimes useful when reindexing limits.
-/
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun
| left => true
| right => false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
right_inv b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
variable {C : Type u}
/-- The function on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
variable [Category.{v} C]
/-- The diagram on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
/-- The natural transformation between two functors out of the
walking pair, specified by its components. -/
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app
| ⟨left⟩ => f
| ⟨right⟩ => g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between two functors out of the walking pair, specified by its
components. -/
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j ↦ match j with
| ⟨left⟩ => f
| ⟨right⟩ => g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
end
/-- Every functor out of the walking pair is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `pair` -/
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
section
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
/-- The natural isomorphism between `pair X Y ⋙ F` and `pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)`. -/
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
end
/-- A binary fan is just a cone on a diagram indexing a product. -/
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
/-- The first projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The second projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
/-- Constructs an isomorphism of `BinaryFan`s out of an isomorphism of the tips that commutes with
the projections. -/
def BinaryFan.ext {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryFan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.fst = e.hom ≫ c'.fst) (h₂ : c.snd = e.hom ≫ c'.snd) : c ≅ c' :=
Cones.ext e (fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> assumption)
@[simp]
lemma BinaryFan.ext_hom_hom {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryFan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.fst = e.hom ≫ c'.fst) (h₂ : c.snd = e.hom ≫ c'.snd) :
(ext e h₁ h₂).hom.hom = e.hom := rfl
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary fan is a limit. -/
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun _ _ h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
/-- A binary cofan is just a cocone on a diagram indexing a coproduct. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
/-- The first inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The second inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
/-- Constructs an isomorphism of `BinaryCofan`s out of an isomorphism of the tips that commutes with
the injections. -/
def BinaryCofan.ext {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryCofan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.inl ≫ e.hom = c'.inl) (h₂ : c.inr ≫ e.hom = c'.inr) : c ≅ c' :=
Cocones.ext e (fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> assumption)
@[simp]
lemma BinaryCofan.ext_hom_hom {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryCofan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.inl ≫ e.hom = c'.inl) (h₂ : c.inr ≫ e.hom = c'.inr) :
(ext e h₁ h₂).hom.hom = e.hom := rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary cofan is a colimit. -/
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun _ _ h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- A binary fan with vertex `P` consists of the two projections `π₁ : P ⟶ X` and `π₂ : P ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π := { app := fun | { as := j } => match j with | left => π₁ | right => π₂ }
/-- A binary cofan with vertex `P` consists of the two inclusions `ι₁ : X ⟶ P` and `ι₂ : Y ⟶ P`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι := { app := fun | { as := j } => match j with | left => ι₁ | right => ι₂ }
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun ⟨l⟩ => by cases l; repeat simp
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun ⟨l⟩ => by cases l; repeat simp
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryFan` constructed using
`BinaryFan.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryCofan` constructed using
`BinaryCofan.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
/-- If `s` is a limit binary fan over `X` and `Y`, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and
`g : W ⟶ Y` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.pt` satisfying `l ≫ s.fst = f` and `l ≫ s.snd = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- If `s` is a colimit binary cofan over `X` and `Y`,, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : s.pt ⟶ W` satisfying `s.inl ≫ l = f` and `s.inr ≫ l = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- Binary products are symmetric. -/
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
/-- If `X' ≅ X`, then `X × Y` also is the product of `X'` and `Y`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
| [IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 407 | 420 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
| · rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 41 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Basic
/-!
# Functors which commute with shifts
Let `C` and `D` be two categories equipped with shifts by an additive monoid `A`. In this file,
we define the notion of functor `F : C ⥤ D` which "commutes" with these shifts. The associated
type class is `[F.CommShift A]`. The data consists of commutation isomorphisms
`F.commShiftIso a : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a` for all `a : A`
which satisfy a compatibility with the addition and the zero. After this was formalised in Lean,
it was found that this definition is exactly the definition which appears in Jean-Louis
Verdier's thesis (I 1.2.3/1.2.4), although the language is different. (In Verdier's thesis,
the shift is not given by a monoidal functor `Discrete A ⥤ C ⥤ C`, but by a fibred
category `C ⥤ BA`, where `BA` is the category with one object, the endomorphisms of which
identify to `A`. The choice of a cleavage for this fibered category gives the individual
shift functors.)
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
namespace Functor
variable {C D E : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Category E]
(F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) (A B : Type*) [AddMonoid A] [AddCommMonoid B]
[HasShift C A] [HasShift D A] [HasShift E A]
[HasShift C B] [HasShift D B]
namespace CommShift
/-- For any functor `F : C ⥤ D`, this is the obvious isomorphism
`shiftFunctor C (0 : A) ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D (0 : A)` deduced from the
isomorphisms `shiftFunctorZero` on both categories `C` and `D`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def isoZero : shiftFunctor C (0 : A) ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D (0 : A) :=
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorZero C A) F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor ≪≫
F.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F (shiftFunctorZero D A).symm
/-- For any functor `F : C ⥤ D` and any `a` in `A` such that `a = 0`,
this is the obvious isomorphism `shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a` deduced from the
isomorphisms `shiftFunctorZero'` on both categories `C` and `D`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def isoZero' (a : A) (ha : a = 0) : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a :=
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorZero' C a ha) F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor ≪≫
F.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F (shiftFunctorZero' D a ha).symm
@[simp]
lemma isoZero'_eq_isoZero : isoZero' F A 0 rfl = isoZero F A := by
ext; simp [isoZero', shiftFunctorZero']
variable {F A}
/-- If a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is equipped with "commutation isomorphisms" with the
shifts by `a` and `b`, then there is a commutation isomorphism with the shift by `c` when
`a + b = c`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def isoAdd' {a b c : A} (h : a + b = c)
(e₁ : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a)
(e₂ : shiftFunctor C b ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D b) :
shiftFunctor C c ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D c :=
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorAdd' C _ _ _ h) F ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft _ e₂ ≪≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e₁ _ ≪≫
Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft _ (shiftFunctorAdd' D _ _ _ h).symm
/-- If a functor `F : C ⥤ D` is equipped with "commutation isomorphisms" with the
shifts by `a` and `b`, then there is a commutation isomorphism with the shift by `a + b`. -/
noncomputable def isoAdd {a b : A}
(e₁ : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a)
(e₂ : shiftFunctor C b ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D b) :
shiftFunctor C (a + b) ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D (a + b) :=
CommShift.isoAdd' rfl e₁ e₂
@[simp]
lemma isoAdd_hom_app {a b : A}
(e₁ : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a)
(e₂ : shiftFunctor C b ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D b) (X : C) :
(CommShift.isoAdd e₁ e₂).hom.app X =
F.map ((shiftFunctorAdd C a b).hom.app X) ≫ e₂.hom.app ((shiftFunctor C a).obj X) ≫
(shiftFunctor D b).map (e₁.hom.app X) ≫ (shiftFunctorAdd D a b).inv.app (F.obj X) := by
simp only [isoAdd, isoAdd'_hom_app, shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd]
@[simp]
lemma isoAdd_inv_app {a b : A}
(e₁ : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a)
(e₂ : shiftFunctor C b ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D b) (X : C) :
(CommShift.isoAdd e₁ e₂).inv.app X = (shiftFunctorAdd D a b).hom.app (F.obj X) ≫
(shiftFunctor D b).map (e₁.inv.app X) ≫ e₂.inv.app ((shiftFunctor C a).obj X) ≫
F.map ((shiftFunctorAdd C a b).inv.app X) := by
simp only [isoAdd, isoAdd'_inv_app, shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd]
end CommShift
/-- A functor `F` commutes with the shift by a monoid `A` if it is equipped with
commutation isomorphisms with the shifts by all `a : A`, and these isomorphisms
satisfy coherence properties with respect to `0 : A` and the addition in `A`. -/
class CommShift where
/-- The commutation isomorphisms for all `a`-shifts this functor is equipped with -/
iso (a : A) : shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a
zero : iso 0 = CommShift.isoZero F A := by aesop_cat
add (a b : A) : iso (a + b) = CommShift.isoAdd (iso a) (iso b) := by aesop_cat
variable {A}
section
variable [F.CommShift A]
/-- If a functor `F` commutes with the shift by `A` (i.e. `[F.CommShift A]`), then
`F.commShiftIso a` is the given isomorphism `shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a`. -/
def commShiftIso (a : A) :
shiftFunctor C a ⋙ F ≅ F ⋙ shiftFunctor D a :=
CommShift.iso a
-- Note: The following two lemmas are introduced in order to have more proofs work `by simp`.
-- Indeed, `simp only [(F.commShiftIso a).hom.naturality f]` would almost never work because
-- of the compositions of functors which appear in both the source and target of
-- `F.commShiftIso a`. Otherwise, we would be forced to use `erw [NatTrans.naturality]`.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma commShiftIso_hom_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (a : A) :
F.map (f⟦a⟧') ≫ (F.commShiftIso a).hom.app Y =
(F.commShiftIso a).hom.app X ≫ (F.map f)⟦a⟧' :=
(F.commShiftIso a).hom.naturality f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma commShiftIso_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (a : A) :
(F.map f)⟦a⟧' ≫ (F.commShiftIso a).inv.app Y =
(F.commShiftIso a).inv.app X ≫ F.map (f⟦a⟧') :=
(F.commShiftIso a).inv.naturality f
variable (A)
lemma commShiftIso_zero :
F.commShiftIso (0 : A) = CommShift.isoZero F A :=
CommShift.zero
set_option linter.docPrime false in
lemma commShiftIso_zero' (a : A) (h : a = 0) :
F.commShiftIso a = CommShift.isoZero' F A a h := by
subst h; rw [CommShift.isoZero'_eq_isoZero, commShiftIso_zero]
variable {A}
lemma commShiftIso_add (a b : A) :
F.commShiftIso (a + b) = CommShift.isoAdd (F.commShiftIso a) (F.commShiftIso b) :=
CommShift.add a b
lemma commShiftIso_add' {a b c : A} (h : a + b = c) :
F.commShiftIso c = CommShift.isoAdd' h (F.commShiftIso a) (F.commShiftIso b) := by
subst h
simp only [commShiftIso_add, CommShift.isoAdd]
end
namespace CommShift
variable (C) in
instance id : CommShift (𝟭 C) A where
iso := fun _ => rightUnitor _ ≪≫ (leftUnitor _).symm
instance comp [F.CommShift A] [G.CommShift A] : (F ⋙ G).CommShift A where
iso a := (Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight (F.commShiftIso a) _ ≪≫
Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft _ (G.commShiftIso a) ≪≫
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm
zero := by
ext X
dsimp
simp only [id_comp, comp_id, commShiftIso_zero, isoZero_hom_app, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, id_obj, comp_map, comp_obj]
add := fun a b => by
ext X
dsimp
simp only [commShiftIso_add, isoAdd_hom_app]
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, id_comp, assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_obj]
simp only [map_comp, assoc, commShiftIso_hom_naturality_assoc]
end CommShift
@[simp]
lemma commShiftIso_id_hom_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(commShiftIso (𝟭 C) a).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := comp_id _
@[simp]
lemma commShiftIso_id_inv_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(commShiftIso (𝟭 C) a).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := comp_id _
lemma commShiftIso_comp_hom_app [F.CommShift A] [G.CommShift A] (a : A) (X : C) :
(commShiftIso (F ⋙ G) a).hom.app X =
G.map ((commShiftIso F a).hom.app X) ≫ (commShiftIso G a).hom.app (F.obj X) := by
simp [commShiftIso, CommShift.iso]
lemma commShiftIso_comp_inv_app [F.CommShift A] [G.CommShift A] (a : A) (X : C) :
(commShiftIso (F ⋙ G) a).inv.app X =
(commShiftIso G a).inv.app (F.obj X) ≫ G.map ((commShiftIso F a).inv.app X) := by
simp [commShiftIso, CommShift.iso]
variable {B}
lemma map_shiftFunctorComm_hom_app [F.CommShift B] (X : C) (a b : B) :
F.map ((shiftFunctorComm C a b).hom.app X) = (F.commShiftIso b).hom.app (X⟦a⟧) ≫
((F.commShiftIso a).hom.app X)⟦b⟧' ≫ (shiftFunctorComm D a b).hom.app (F.obj X) ≫
((F.commShiftIso b).inv.app X)⟦a⟧' ≫ (F.commShiftIso a).inv.app (X⟦b⟧) := by
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (F.commShiftIso_add a b)) X
simp only [comp_obj, CommShift.isoAdd_hom_app,
← cancel_epi (F.map ((shiftFunctorAdd C a b).inv.app X)), Category.assoc,
← F.map_comp_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, F.map_id, Category.id_comp, F.map_comp] at eq
simp only [shiftFunctorComm_eq D a b _ rfl]
dsimp
simp only [Functor.map_comp, shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, Category.assoc,
← reassoc_of% eq, shiftFunctorComm_eq C a b _ rfl]
dsimp
rw [Functor.map_comp]
simp only [NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (F.commShiftIso_add' (add_comm b a))) X,
CommShift.isoAdd'_hom_app, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc,
← Functor.map_comp_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_app,
Functor.map_id, Category.id_comp, comp_obj, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma map_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app [F.CommShift A] (X : C) (a b : A) (h : a + b = 0) :
F.map ((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C a b h).hom.app X) =
(F.commShiftIso b).hom.app (X⟦a⟧) ≫ ((F.commShiftIso a).hom.app X)⟦b⟧' ≫
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId D a b h).hom.app (F.obj X) := by
dsimp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId]
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (F.commShiftIso_add' h)) X
simp only [commShiftIso_zero, comp_obj, CommShift.isoZero_hom_app,
CommShift.isoAdd'_hom_app] at eq
rw [← cancel_epi (F.map ((shiftFunctorAdd' C a b 0 h).hom.app X)), ← reassoc_of% eq, F.map_comp]
simp only [Iso.inv_hom_id_app, id_obj, Category.comp_id, ← F.map_comp_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_app,
F.map_id, Category.id_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma map_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app [F.CommShift A] (X : C) (a b : A) (h : a + b = 0) :
F.map ((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C a b h).inv.app X) =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId D a b h).inv.app (F.obj X) ≫
((F.commShiftIso a).inv.app X)⟦b⟧' ≫ (F.commShiftIso b).inv.app (X⟦a⟧) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (F.map ((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C a b h).hom.app X)), ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id_app, F.map_id, map_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app]
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_app_assoc,
← Functor.map_comp_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id, Category.id_comp]
end Functor
namespace NatTrans
variable {C D E J : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Category E] [Category J]
{F₁ F₂ F₃ : C ⥤ D} (τ : F₁ ⟶ F₂) (τ' : F₂ ⟶ F₃) (e : F₁ ≅ F₂)
(G G' : D ⥤ E) (τ'' : G ⟶ G') (H : E ⥤ J)
(A : Type*) [AddMonoid A] [HasShift C A] [HasShift D A] [HasShift E A] [HasShift J A]
[F₁.CommShift A] [F₂.CommShift A] [F₃.CommShift A]
[G.CommShift A] [G'.CommShift A] [H.CommShift A]
/-- If `τ : F₁ ⟶ F₂` is a natural transformation between two functors
which commute with a shift by an additive monoid `A`, this typeclass
asserts a compatibility of `τ` with these shifts. -/
class CommShift : Prop where
shift_comm (a : A) : (F₁.commShiftIso a).hom ≫ whiskerRight τ _ =
whiskerLeft _ τ ≫ (F₂.commShiftIso a).hom := by aesop_cat
section
variable {A} [NatTrans.CommShift τ A]
@[reassoc]
lemma shift_comm (a : A) :
(F₁.commShiftIso a).hom ≫ whiskerRight τ _ =
whiskerLeft _ τ ≫ (F₂.commShiftIso a).hom := by
apply CommShift.shift_comm
@[reassoc]
lemma shift_app_comm (a : A) (X : C) :
(F₁.commShiftIso a).hom.app X ≫ (τ.app X)⟦a⟧' =
τ.app (X⟦a⟧) ≫ (F₂.commShiftIso a).hom.app X :=
congr_app (shift_comm τ a) X
@[reassoc]
lemma shift_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(τ.app X)⟦a⟧' = (F₁.commShiftIso a).inv.app X ≫
τ.app (X⟦a⟧) ≫ (F₂.commShiftIso a).hom.app X := by
rw [← shift_app_comm, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
@[reassoc]
lemma app_shift (a : A) (X : C) :
τ.app (X⟦a⟧) = (F₁.commShiftIso a).hom.app X ≫ (τ.app X)⟦a⟧' ≫
(F₂.commShiftIso a).inv.app X := by
simp [shift_app_comm_assoc τ a X]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-31")] alias CommShift.comm' := shift_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-31")] alias CommShift.comm := shift_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-31")] alias CommShift.comm_app := shift_app_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-31")] alias CommShift.shift_app := shift_app
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-31")] alias CommShift.app_shift := app_shift
end
namespace CommShift
instance of_iso_inv [NatTrans.CommShift e.hom A] :
NatTrans.CommShift e.inv A := ⟨fun a => by
ext X
dsimp
rw [← cancel_epi (e.hom.app (X⟦a⟧)), e.hom_inv_id_app_assoc, ← shift_app_comm_assoc,
← Functor.map_comp, e.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id]⟩
lemma of_isIso [IsIso τ] [NatTrans.CommShift τ A] :
NatTrans.CommShift (inv τ) A := by
haveI : NatTrans.CommShift (asIso τ).hom A := by assumption
change NatTrans.CommShift (asIso τ).inv A
infer_instance
variable (F₁) in
instance id : NatTrans.CommShift (𝟙 F₁) A where
attribute [local simp] Functor.commShiftIso_comp_hom_app
shift_app_comm shift_app_comm_assoc
instance comp [NatTrans.CommShift τ A] [NatTrans.CommShift τ' A] :
NatTrans.CommShift (τ ≫ τ') A where
instance whiskerRight [NatTrans.CommShift τ A] :
NatTrans.CommShift (whiskerRight τ G) A := ⟨fun a => by
ext X
simp only [whiskerRight_twice, Functor.associator_hom_app, Functor.associator_inv_app, id_comp,
comp_id, comp_app, whiskerRight_app, Functor.comp_map, whiskerLeft_app,
Functor.commShiftIso_comp_hom_app, Category.assoc,
← Functor.commShiftIso_hom_naturality,
← G.map_comp_assoc, shift_app_comm]⟩
instance whiskerLeft [NatTrans.CommShift τ'' A] :
NatTrans.CommShift (whiskerLeft F₁ τ'') A where
instance associator : CommShift (Functor.associator F₁ G H).hom A where
instance leftUnitor : CommShift F₁.leftUnitor.hom A where
instance rightUnitor : CommShift F₁.rightUnitor.hom A where
end CommShift
end NatTrans
namespace Functor
namespace CommShift
variable {C D E : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
{F : C ⥤ D} {G : C ⥤ D} (e : F ≅ G)
(A : Type*) [AddMonoid A] [HasShift C A] [HasShift D A]
[F.CommShift A]
/-- If `e : F ≅ G` is an isomorphism of functors and if `F` commutes with the
shift, then `G` also commutes with the shift. -/
def ofIso : G.CommShift A where
iso a := isoWhiskerLeft _ e.symm ≪≫ F.commShiftIso a ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e _
zero := by
ext X
| simp only [comp_obj, F.commShiftIso_zero A, Iso.trans_hom, isoWhiskerLeft_hom,
Iso.symm_hom, isoWhiskerRight_hom, NatTrans.comp_app, whiskerLeft_app,
isoZero_hom_app, whiskerRight_app, assoc]
erw [← e.inv.naturality_assoc, ← NatTrans.naturality,
e.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
add a b := by
ext X
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Shift/CommShift.lean | 368 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Trace
/-!
# Linear maps between direct sums
This file contains results about linear maps which respect direct sum decompositions of their
domain and codomain.
-/
open Set DirectSum
namespace LinearMap
variable {ι R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {N : ι → Submodule R M}
section IsInternal
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-- If a linear map `f : M₁ → M₂` respects direct sum decompositions of `M₁` and `M₂`, then it has a
block diagonal matrix with respect to bases compatible with the direct sum decompositions. -/
lemma toMatrix_directSum_collectedBasis_eq_blockDiagonal' {R M₁ M₂ : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] {N₁ : ι → Submodule R M₁} (h₁ : IsInternal N₁)
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂] {N₂ : ι → Submodule R M₂} (h₂ : IsInternal N₂)
{κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Fintype (κ₁ i)] [∀ i, Finite (κ₂ i)] [∀ i, DecidableEq (κ₁ i)]
[Fintype ι] (b₁ : (i : ι) → Basis (κ₁ i) R (N₁ i)) (b₂ : (i : ι) → Basis (κ₂ i) R (N₂ i))
{f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂} (hf : ∀ i, MapsTo f (N₁ i) (N₂ i)) :
toMatrix (h₁.collectedBasis b₁) (h₂.collectedBasis b₂) f =
Matrix.blockDiagonal' fun i ↦ toMatrix (b₁ i) (b₂ i) (f.restrict (hf i)) := by
ext ⟨i, _⟩ ⟨j, _⟩
simp only [toMatrix_apply, Matrix.blockDiagonal'_apply]
rcases eq_or_ne i j with rfl | hij
· simp [h₂.collectedBasis_repr_of_mem _ (hf _ (Subtype.mem _)), restrict_apply]
· simp [hij, h₂.collectedBasis_repr_of_mem_ne _ hij.symm (hf _ (Subtype.mem _))]
lemma diag_toMatrix_directSum_collectedBasis_eq_zero_of_mapsTo_ne
{κ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Fintype (κ i)] [∀ i, DecidableEq (κ i)]
{s : Finset ι} (h : IsInternal fun i : s ↦ N i)
(b : (i : s) → Basis (κ i) R (N i)) (σ : ι → ι) (hσ : ∀ i, σ i ≠ i)
{f : Module.End R M} (hf : ∀ i, MapsTo f (N i) (N <| σ i)) (hN : ∀ i, i ∉ s → N i = ⊥) :
Matrix.diag (toMatrix (h.collectedBasis b) (h.collectedBasis b) f) = 0 := by
ext ⟨i, k⟩
simp only [Matrix.diag_apply, Pi.zero_apply, toMatrix_apply, IsInternal.collectedBasis_coe]
by_cases hi : σ i ∈ s
· let j : s := ⟨σ i, hi⟩
replace hσ : j ≠ i := fun hij ↦ hσ i <| Subtype.ext_iff.mp hij
exact h.collectedBasis_repr_of_mem_ne b hσ <| hf _ <| Subtype.mem (b i k)
· suffices f (b i k) = 0 by simp [this]
simpa [hN _ hi] using hf i <| Subtype.mem (b i k)
variable [∀ i, Module.Finite R (N i)] [∀ i, Module.Free R (N i)]
| /-- The trace of an endomorphism of a direct sum is the sum of the traces on each component.
See also `LinearMap.trace_restrict_eq_sum_trace_restrict`. -/
lemma trace_eq_sum_trace_restrict (h : IsInternal N) [Fintype ι]
{f : M →ₗ[R] M} (hf : ∀ i, MapsTo f (N i) (N i)) :
trace R M f = ∑ i, trace R (N i) (f.restrict (hf i)) := by
let b : (i : ι) → Basis _ R (N i) := fun i ↦ Module.Free.chooseBasis R (N i)
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R (h.collectedBasis b),
toMatrix_directSum_collectedBasis_eq_blockDiagonal' h h b b hf, Matrix.trace_blockDiagonal',
← trace_eq_matrix_trace]
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/LinearMap.lean | 62 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Topological study of spaces `Π (n : ℕ), E n`
When `E n` are topological spaces, the space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` is naturally a topological space
(with the product topology). When `E n` are uniform spaces, it also inherits a uniform structure.
However, it does not inherit a canonical metric space structure of the `E n`. Nevertheless, one
can put a noncanonical metric space structure (or rather, several of them). This is done in this
file.
## Main definitions and results
One can define a combinatorial distance on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, as follows:
* `PiNat.cylinder x n` is the set of points `y` with `x i = y i` for `i < n`.
* `PiNat.firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x i ≠ y i`.
* `PiNat.dist x y` is equal to `(1/2) ^ (firstDiff x y)`. It defines a distance
on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, compatible with the topology when the `E n` have the discrete topology.
* `PiNat.metricSpace`: the metric space structure, given by this distance. Not registered as an
instance. This space is a complete metric space.
* `PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity`: the same metric space structure, but adjusting the
uniformity defeqness when the `E n` already have the discrete uniformity. Not registered as an
instance
* `PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat`: the particular case of `ℕ → ℕ`, not registered as an instance.
These results are used to construct continuous functions on `Π n, E n`:
* `PiNat.exists_retraction_of_isClosed`: given a nonempty closed subset `s` of `Π (n : ℕ), E n`,
there exists a retraction onto `s`, i.e., a continuous map from the whole space to `s`
restricting to the identity on `s`.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace`: given any nonempty complete metric
space with second-countable topology, there exists a continuous surjection from `ℕ → ℕ` onto
this space.
One can also put distances on `Π (i : ι), E i` when the spaces `E i` are metric spaces (not discrete
in general), and `ι` is countable.
* `PiCountable.dist` is the distance on `Π i, E i` given by
`dist x y = ∑' i, min (1/2)^(encode i) (dist (x i) (y i))`.
* `PiCountable.metricSpace` is the corresponding metric space structure, adjusted so that
the uniformity is definitionally the product uniformity. Not registered as an instance.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ one_lt_two inv_le_inv₀ zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
/-! ### The firstDiff function -/
open Classical in
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, then `firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x` and `y`
differ. If `x = y`, then by convention we set `firstDiff x x = 0`. -/
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
classical
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
classical
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
/-! ### Cylinders -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, the cylinder set of length `n` around `x`, denoted
`cylinder x n`, is the set of sequences `y` that coincide with `x` on the first `n` symbols, i.e.,
such that `y i = x i` for all `i < n`.
-/
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 119 | 119 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
|
open Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 479 | 480 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Ainsley Pahljina
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
/-!
# The Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne primes.
We define `lucasLehmerResidue : Π p : ℕ, ZMod (2^p - 1)`, and
prove `lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 → Prime (mersenne p)`.
We construct a `norm_num` extension to calculate this residue to certify primality of Mersenne
primes using `lucas_lehmer_sufficiency`.
## TODO
- Show reverse implication.
- Speed up the calculations using `n ≡ (n % 2^p) + (n / 2^p) [MOD 2^p - 1]`.
- Find some bigger primes!
## History
This development began as a student project by Ainsley Pahljina,
and was then cleaned up for mathlib by Kim Morrison.
The tactic for certified computation of Lucas-Lehmer residues was provided by Mario Carneiro.
This tactic was ported by Thomas Murrills to Lean 4, and then it was converted to a `norm_num`
extension and made to use kernel reductions by Kyle Miller.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
/-- The Mersenne numbers, 2^p - 1. -/
def mersenne (p : ℕ) : ℕ :=
2 ^ p - 1
theorem strictMono_mersenne : StrictMono mersenne := fun m n h ↦
(Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right <| Nat.one_le_pow _ _ two_pos).2 <| by gcongr; norm_num1
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_lt_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p < mersenne q ↔ p < q :=
strictMono_mersenne.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_lt_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_lt_mersenne
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_le_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p ≤ mersenne q ↔ p ≤ q :=
strictMono_mersenne.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_le_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_le_mersenne
@[simp] theorem mersenne_zero : mersenne 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mersenne_odd : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Odd (mersenne p) ↔ p ≠ 0
| 0 => by simp
| p + 1 => by
simpa using Nat.Even.sub_odd (one_le_pow₀ one_le_two)
(even_two.pow_of_ne_zero p.succ_ne_zero) odd_one
@[simp] theorem mersenne_pos {p : ℕ} : 0 < mersenne p ↔ 0 < p := mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 0)
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
alias ⟨_, mersenne_pos_of_pos⟩ := mersenne_pos
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `mersenne`. -/
@[positivity mersenne _]
def evalMersenne : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℕ), ~q(mersenne $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(mersenne_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => pure (.nonnegative q(Nat.zero_le (mersenne $a)))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not mersenne"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_mersenne {p : ℕ} : 1 < mersenne p ↔ 1 < p :=
mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 1)
@[simp]
theorem succ_mersenne (k : ℕ) : mersenne k + 1 = 2 ^ k := by
rw [mersenne, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num)
namespace LucasLehmer
open Nat
/-!
We now define three(!) different versions of the recurrence
`s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2`.
These versions take values either in `ℤ`, in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`, or
in `ℤ` but applying `% (2^p - 1)` at each step.
They are each useful at different points in the proof,
so we take a moment setting up the lemmas relating them.
-/
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ℤ`. -/
def s : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => s i ^ 2 - 2
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def sZMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => sZMod p i ^ 2 - 2
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = ((s i)^2 - 2) % (2^p - 1)` in `ℤ`. -/
def sMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4 % (2 ^ p - 1)
| i + 1 => (sMod p i ^ 2 - 2) % (2 ^ p - 1)
theorem mersenne_int_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) : (0 : ℤ) < 2 ^ p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 <| mod_cast Nat.one_lt_two_pow hp
theorem mersenne_int_ne_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) ≠ 0 :=
(mersenne_int_pos hp).ne'
theorem sMod_nonneg (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : 0 ≤ sMod p i := by
cases i <;> dsimp [sMod]
· exact sup_eq_right.mp rfl
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
exact mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp
theorem sMod_mod (p i : ℕ) : sMod p i % (2 ^ p - 1) = sMod p i := by cases i <;> simp [sMod]
theorem sMod_lt (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : sMod p i < 2 ^ p - 1 := by
rw [← sMod_mod]
refine (Int.emod_lt_abs _ (mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp)).trans_eq ?_
exact abs_of_nonneg (mersenne_int_pos hp).le
theorem sZMod_eq_s (p' : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod (p' + 2) i = (s i : ZMod (2 ^ (p' + 2) - 1)) := by
induction i with
| zero => dsimp [s, sZMod]; norm_num
| succ i ih => push_cast [s, sZMod, ih]; rfl
-- These next two don't make good `norm_cast` lemmas.
theorem Int.natCast_pow_pred (b p : ℕ) (w : 0 < b) : ((b ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (b : ℤ) ^ p - 1 := by
have : 1 ≤ b ^ p := Nat.one_le_pow p b w
norm_cast
theorem Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred (p : ℕ) : ((2 ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) :=
Int.natCast_pow_pred 2 p (by decide)
theorem sZMod_eq_sMod (p : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod p i = (sMod p i : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)) := by
induction i <;> push_cast [← Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred p, sMod, sZMod, *] <;> rfl
/-- The Lucas-Lehmer residue is `s p (p-2)` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def lucasLehmerResidue (p : ℕ) : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1) :=
sZMod p (p - 2)
theorem residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero (p : ℕ) (w : 1 < p) :
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 ↔ sMod p (p - 2) = 0 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue]
rw [sZMod_eq_sMod p]
constructor
· -- We want to use that fact that `0 ≤ s_mod p (p-2) < 2^p - 1`
-- and `lucas_lehmer_residue p = 0 → 2^p - 1 ∣ s_mod p (p-2)`.
intro h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, ofNat_pos, pow_pos, cast_pred,
cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
apply Int.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt _ _ h <;> clear h
· exact sMod_nonneg _ (by positivity) _
· exact sMod_lt _ (by positivity) _
· intro h
rw [h]
simp
/-- **Lucas-Lehmer Test**: a Mersenne number `2^p-1` is prime if and only if
the Lucas-Lehmer residue `s p (p-2) % (2^p - 1)` is zero.
-/
def LucasLehmerTest (p : ℕ) : Prop :=
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0
/-- `q` is defined as the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, bundled as an `ℕ+`. -/
def q (p : ℕ) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.minFac (mersenne p), Nat.minFac_pos (mersenne p)⟩
-- It would be nice to define this as (ℤ/qℤ)[x] / (x^2 - 3),
-- obtaining the ring structure for free,
-- but that seems to be more trouble than it's worth;
-- if it were easy to make the definition,
-- cardinality calculations would be somewhat more involved, too.
/-- We construct the ring `X q` as ℤ/qℤ + √3 ℤ/qℤ. -/
def X (q : ℕ+) : Type :=
ZMod q × ZMod q
namespace X
variable {q : ℕ+}
instance : Inhabited (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : Fintype (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : DecidableEq (X q) := inferInstanceAs (DecidableEq (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : AddCommGroup (X q) := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (ZMod q × ZMod q))
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : X q} (h₁ : x.1 = y.1) (h₂ : x.2 = y.2) : x = y := by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[simp] theorem zero_fst : (0 : X q).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_snd : (0 : X q).2 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_fst (x y : X q) : (x + y).1 = x.1 + y.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_snd (x y : X q) : (x + y).2 = x.2 + y.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_fst (x : X q) : (-x).1 = -x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_snd (x : X q) : (-x).2 = -x.2 :=
rfl
instance : Mul (X q) where mul x y := (x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2, x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1)
@[simp]
theorem mul_fst (x y : X q) : (x * y).1 = x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_snd (x y : X q) : (x * y).2 = x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1 :=
rfl
instance : One (X q) where one := ⟨1, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_fst : (1 : X q).1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_snd : (1 : X q).2 = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Monoid (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Mul (X q)), inferInstanceAs (One (X q)) with
mul_assoc := fun x y z => by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
one_mul := fun x => by ext <;> simp
mul_one := fun x => by ext <;> simp }
instance : NatCast (X q) where
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
@[simp] theorem fst_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_fst (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : X q).fst = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_snd (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : X q).snd = 0 :=
rfl
instance : AddGroupWithOne (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (NatCast (X q)) with
natCast_zero := by ext <;> simp
natCast_succ := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
intCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by ext <;> simp
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by ext <;> simp }
theorem left_distrib (x y z : X q) : x * (y + z) = x * y + x * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
theorem right_distrib (x y z : X q) : (x + y) * z = x * z + y * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
instance : Ring (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddGroupWithOne (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)) with
left_distrib := left_distrib
right_distrib := right_distrib
mul_zero := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
zero_mul := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp }
instance : CommRing (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Ring (X q)) with
mul_comm := fun _ _ ↦ by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring }
instance [Fact (1 < (q : ℕ))] : Nontrivial (X q) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, ne_of_apply_ne Prod.fst zero_ne_one⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem fst_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (n m : ℤ) : ((n * m : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) * (m : X q) := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) := by ext <;> simp
/-- The cardinality of `X` is `q^2`. -/
theorem card_eq : Fintype.card (X q) = q ^ 2 := by
dsimp [X]
rw [Fintype.card_prod, ZMod.card q, sq]
/-- There are strictly fewer than `q^2` units, since `0` is not a unit. -/
nonrec theorem card_units_lt (w : 1 < q) : Fintype.card (X q)ˣ < q ^ 2 := by
have : Fact (1 < (q : ℕ)) := ⟨w⟩
convert card_units_lt (X q)
rw [card_eq]
/-- We define `ω = 2 + √3`. -/
def ω : X q := (2, 1)
/-- We define `ωb = 2 - √3`, which is the inverse of `ω`. -/
def ωb : X q := (2, -1)
theorem ω_mul_ωb (q : ℕ+) : (ω : X q) * ωb = 1 := by
dsimp [ω, ωb]
ext <;> simp; ring
theorem ωb_mul_ω (q : ℕ+) : (ωb : X q) * ω = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, ω_mul_ωb]
/-- A closed form for the recurrence relation. -/
theorem closed_form (i : ℕ) : (s i : X q) = (ω : X q) ^ 2 ^ i + (ωb : X q) ^ 2 ^ i := by
induction i with
| zero =>
dsimp [s, ω, ωb]
ext <;> norm_num
| succ i ih =>
calc
(s (i + 1) : X q) = (s i ^ 2 - 2 : ℤ) := rfl
_ = (s i : X q) ^ 2 - 2 := by push_cast; rfl
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i + ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 - 2 := by rw [ih]
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + 2 * (ωb ^ 2 ^ i * ω ^ 2 ^ i) - 2 := by ring
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 := by
rw [← mul_pow ωb ω, ωb_mul_ω, one_pow, mul_one, add_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ω ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) + ωb ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) := by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul, _root_.pow_succ]
end X
open X
/-!
Here and below, we introduce `p' = p - 2`, in order to avoid using subtraction in `ℕ`.
-/
/-- If `1 < p`, then `q p`, the smallest prime factor of `mersenne p`, is more than 2. -/
theorem two_lt_q (p' : ℕ) : 2 < q (p' + 2) := by
refine (minFac_prime (one_lt_mersenne.2 ?_).ne').two_le.lt_of_ne' ?_
· exact le_add_left _ _
· rw [Ne, minFac_eq_two_iff, mersenne, Nat.pow_succ']
exact Nat.two_not_dvd_two_mul_sub_one Nat.one_le_two_pow
theorem ω_pow_formula (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
∃ k : ℤ,
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) =
k * mersenne (p' + 2) * (ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ p' - 1 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue] at h
rw [sZMod_eq_s p'] at h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_right, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, ofNat_pos,
pow_pos, cast_pred, cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
obtain ⟨k, h⟩ := h
use k
replace h := congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (n : X (q (p' + 2)))) h
-- coercion from ℤ to X q
dsimp at h
rw [closed_form] at h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x => ω ^ 2 ^ p' * x) h
dsimp at h
have t : 2 ^ p' + 2 ^ p' = 2 ^ (p' + 1) := by ring
rw [mul_add, ← pow_add ω, t, ← mul_pow ω ωb (2 ^ p'), ω_mul_ωb, one_pow] at h
rw [mul_comm, coe_mul] at h
rw [mul_comm _ (k : X (q (p' + 2)))] at h
replace h := eq_sub_of_add_eq h
have : 1 ≤ 2 ^ (p' + 2) := Nat.one_le_pow _ _ (by decide)
exact mod_cast h
/-- `q` is the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, so `M p = 0` in `X q`. -/
theorem mersenne_coe_X (p : ℕ) : (mersenne p : X (q p)) = 0 := by
ext <;> simp [mersenne, q, ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, -pow_pos]
apply Nat.minFac_dvd
theorem ω_pow_eq_neg_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) = -1 := by
obtain ⟨k, w⟩ := ω_pow_formula p' h
rw [mersenne_coe_X] at w
simpa using w
theorem ω_pow_eq_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = 1 :=
calc
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = (ω ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1)) ^ 2 := by
rw [← pow_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ]
_ = (-1) ^ 2 := by rw [ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h]
_ = 1 := by simp
/-- `ω` as an element of the group of units. -/
def ωUnit (p : ℕ) : Units (X (q p)) where
val := ω
inv := ωb
val_inv := ω_mul_ωb _
inv_val := ωb_mul_ω _
@[simp]
theorem ωUnit_coe (p : ℕ) : (ωUnit p : X (q p)) = ω :=
rfl
/-- The order of `ω` in the unit group is exactly `2^p`. -/
theorem order_ω (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
orderOf (ωUnit (p' + 2)) = 2 ^ (p' + 2) := by
apply Nat.eq_prime_pow_of_dvd_least_prime_pow
-- the order of ω divides 2^p
· exact Nat.prime_two
· intro o
have ω_pow := orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.1 o
replace ω_pow :=
congr_arg (Units.coeHom (X (q (p' + 2))) : Units (X (q (p' + 2))) → X (q (p' + 2))) ω_pow
simp? at ω_pow says
simp only [Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, ωUnit_coe, Units.val_one] at ω_pow
have h : (1 : ZMod (q (p' + 2))) = -1 :=
congr_arg Prod.fst (ω_pow.symm.trans (ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h))
haveI : Fact (2 < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ)) := ⟨two_lt_q _⟩
apply ZMod.neg_one_ne_one h.symm
· apply orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.2
apply Units.ext
push_cast
exact ω_pow_eq_one p' h
theorem order_ineq (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
2 ^ (p' + 2) < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ) ^ 2 :=
calc
2 ^ (p' + 2) = orderOf (ωUnit (p' + 2)) := (order_ω p' h).symm
_ ≤ Fintype.card (X (q (p' + 2)))ˣ := orderOf_le_card_univ
_ < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ) ^ 2 := card_units_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt (two_lt_q _))
end LucasLehmer
export LucasLehmer (LucasLehmerTest lucasLehmerResidue)
open LucasLehmer
theorem lucas_lehmer_sufficiency (p : ℕ) (w : 1 < p) : LucasLehmerTest p → (mersenne p).Prime := by
let p' := p - 2
have z : p = p' + 2 := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le w.nat_succ_le).mp rfl
have w : 1 < p' + 2 := Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
contrapose
intro a t
rw [z] at a
rw [z] at t
have h₁ := order_ineq p' t
have h₂ := Nat.minFac_sq_le_self (mersenne_pos.2 (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt w)) a
have h := lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ h₂
exact not_lt_of_ge (Nat.sub_le _ _) h
namespace LucasLehmer
/-!
### `norm_num` extension
Next we define a `norm_num` extension that calculates `LucasLehmerTest p` for `1 < p`.
It makes use of a version of `sMod` that is specifically written to be reducible by the
Lean 4 kernel, which has the capability of efficiently reducing natural number expressions.
With this reduction in hand, it's a simple matter of applying the lemma
`LucasLehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero`.
See [Archive/Examples/MersennePrimes.lean] for certifications of all Mersenne primes
up through `mersenne 4423`.
-/
namespace norm_num_ext
open Qq Lean Elab.Tactic Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- Version of `sMod` that is `ℕ`-valued. One should have `q = 2 ^ p - 1`.
This can be reduced by the kernel. -/
def sModNat (q : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 4 % q
| i + 1 => (sModNat q i ^ 2 + (q - 2)) % q
theorem sModNat_eq_sMod (p k : ℕ) (hp : 2 ≤ p) : (sModNat (2 ^ p - 1) k : ℤ) = sMod p k := by
have h1 := calc
4 = 2 ^ 2 := by norm_num
_ ≤ 2 ^ p := Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) hp
have h2 : 1 ≤ 2 ^ p := by omega
induction k with
| zero =>
rw [sModNat, sMod, Int.natCast_emod]
simp [h2]
| succ k ih =>
rw [sModNat, sMod, ← ih]
have h3 : 2 ≤ 2 ^ p - 1 := by
zify [h2]
calc
(2 : Int) ≤ 4 - 1 := by norm_num
_ ≤ 2 ^ p - 1 := by zify at h1; exact Int.sub_le_sub_right h1 _
zify [h2, h3]
rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, add_comm _ (-2), ← add_assoc,
Int.add_emod_right, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Tail-recursive version of `sModNat`. -/
def sModNatTR (q : ℕ) (k : Nat) : ℕ :=
go k (4 % q)
where
/-- Helper function for `sMod''`. -/
go : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| 0, acc => acc
| n + 1, acc => go n ((acc ^ 2 + (q - 2)) % q)
/--
Generalization of `sModNat` with arbitrary base case,
useful for proving `sModNatTR` and `sModNat` agree.
-/
def sModNat_aux (b : ℕ) (q : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => b
| i + 1 => (sModNat_aux b q i ^ 2 + (q - 2)) % q
theorem sModNat_aux_eq (q k : ℕ) : sModNat_aux (4 % q) q k = sModNat q k := by
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih => rw [sModNat_aux, ih, sModNat, ← ih]
theorem sModNatTR_eq_sModNat (q : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sModNatTR q i = sModNat q i := by
rw [sModNatTR, helper, sModNat_aux_eq]
where
helper b q k : sModNatTR.go q k b = sModNat_aux b q k := by
induction k generalizing b with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [sModNatTR.go, ih, sModNat_aux]
clear ih
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [sModNat_aux, ih, sModNat_aux]
lemma testTrueHelper (p : ℕ) (hp : Nat.blt 1 p = true) (h : sModNatTR (2 ^ p - 1) (p - 2) = 0) :
LucasLehmerTest p := by
rw [Nat.blt_eq] at hp
rw [LucasLehmerTest, LucasLehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero p hp, ← sModNat_eq_sMod p _ hp,
← sModNatTR_eq_sModNat, h]
rfl
lemma testFalseHelper (p : ℕ) (hp : Nat.blt 1 p = true)
(h : Nat.ble 1 (sModNatTR (2 ^ p - 1) (p - 2))) : ¬ LucasLehmerTest p := by
rw [Nat.blt_eq] at hp
rw [Nat.ble_eq, Nat.succ_le, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
rw [LucasLehmerTest, LucasLehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero p hp, ← sModNat_eq_sMod p _ hp,
← sModNatTR_eq_sModNat]
simpa using h
theorem isNat_lucasLehmerTest : {p np : ℕ} →
IsNat p np → LucasLehmerTest np → LucasLehmerTest p
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, h => h
theorem isNat_not_lucasLehmerTest : {p np : ℕ} →
IsNat p np → ¬ LucasLehmerTest np → ¬ LucasLehmerTest p
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, h => h
/-- Calculate `LucasLehmer.LucasLehmerTest p` for `2 ≤ p` by using kernel reduction for the
`sMod'` function. -/
@[norm_num LucasLehmer.LucasLehmerTest (_ : ℕ)]
def evalLucasLehmerTest : NormNumExt where eval {_ _} e := do
let .app _ (p : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure
let ⟨ep, hp⟩ ← deriveNat p _
let np := ep.natLit!
unless 1 < np do
failure
haveI' h1ltp : Nat.blt 1 $ep =Q true := ⟨⟩
if sModNatTR (2 ^ np - 1) (np - 2) = 0 then
haveI' hs : sModNatTR (2 ^ $ep - 1) ($ep - 2) =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
have pf : Q(LucasLehmerTest $ep) := q(testTrueHelper $ep $h1ltp $hs)
have pf' : Q(LucasLehmerTest $p) := q(isNat_lucasLehmerTest $hp $pf)
return .isTrue pf'
else
haveI' hs : Nat.ble 1 (sModNatTR (2 ^ $ep - 1) ($ep - 2)) =Q true := ⟨⟩
have pf : Q(¬ LucasLehmerTest $ep) := q(testFalseHelper $ep $h1ltp $hs)
have pf' : Q(¬ LucasLehmerTest $p) := q(isNat_not_lucasLehmerTest $hp $pf)
return .isFalse pf'
end norm_num_ext
end LucasLehmer
/-!
This implementation works successfully to prove `(2^4423 - 1).Prime`,
and all the Mersenne primes up to this point appear in [Archive/Examples/MersennePrimes.lean].
These can be calculated nearly instantly, and `(2^9689 - 1).Prime` only fails due to deep
recursion.
(Note by kmill: the following notes were for the Lean 3 version. They seem like they could still
be useful, so I'm leaving them here.)
There's still low hanging fruit available to do faster computations
based on the formula
```
n ≡ (n % 2^p) + (n / 2^p) [MOD 2^p - 1]
```
and the fact that `% 2^p` and `/ 2^p` can be very efficient on the binary representation.
Someone should do this, too!
-/
theorem modEq_mersenne (n k : ℕ) : k ≡ k / 2 ^ n + k % 2 ^ n [MOD 2 ^ n - 1] :=
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/help.20finding.20a.20lemma/near/177698446
calc
k = 2 ^ n * (k / 2 ^ n) + k % 2 ^ n := (Nat.div_add_mod k (2 ^ n)).symm
_ ≡ 1 * (k / 2 ^ n) + k % 2 ^ n [MOD 2 ^ n - 1] :=
((Nat.modEq_sub <| Nat.succ_le_of_lt <| pow_pos zero_lt_two _).mul_right _).add_right _
_ = k / 2 ^ n + k % 2 ^ n := by rw [one_mul]
-- It's hard to know what the limiting factor for large Mersenne primes would be.
-- In the purely computational world, I think it's the squaring operation in `s`.
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LucasLehmer.lean | 683 | 689 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Quotients of semirings
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := Relation.EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : Relation.EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
simpa only [pow_succ, mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] using
congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h))
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
theorem mul_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ := by
show mul r _ _ = _
rw [mul_def]
rfl
theorem pow_quot {a} {n : ℕ} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ ^ n : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a ^ n)⟩ := by
show npow r _ _ = _
rw [npow_def]
theorem neg_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ := by
show neg r _ = _
rw [neg_def]
rfl
theorem sub_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a b} :
(⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ - ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a - b)⟩ := by
show sub r _ _ = _
rw [sub_def]
rfl
theorem smul_quot [Algebra S R] {n : S} {a : R} :
(n • ⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (n • a)⟩ := by
show smul r _ _ = _
rw [smul]
rfl
instance instIsScalarTower [CommSemiring T] [SMul S T] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
| [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun s t ⟨a⟩ => Quot.inductionOn a fun a' => by simp only [RingQuot.smul_quot, smul_assoc]⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 250 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 216 | 222 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.AEMeasurable
/-!
# Typeclasses for measurability of operations
In this file we define classes `MeasurableMul` etc and prove dot-style lemmas
(`Measurable.mul`, `AEMeasurable.mul` etc). For binary operations we define two typeclasses:
- `MeasurableMul` says that both left and right multiplication are measurable;
- `MeasurableMul₂` says that `fun p : α × α => p.1 * p.2` is measurable,
and similarly for other binary operations. The reason for introducing these classes is that in case
of topological space `α` equipped with the Borel `σ`-algebra, instances for `MeasurableMul₂`
etc require `α` to have a second countable topology.
We define separate classes for `MeasurableDiv`/`MeasurableSub`
because on some types (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℝ≥0∞`) division and/or subtraction are not defined as `a * b⁻¹` /
`a + (-b)`.
For instances relating, e.g., `ContinuousMul` to `MeasurableMul` see file
`MeasureTheory.BorelSpace`.
## Implementation notes
For the heuristics of `@[to_additive]` it is important that the type with a multiplication
(or another multiplicative operations) is the first (implicit) argument of all declarations.
## Tags
measurable function, arithmetic operator
## TODO
* Uniformize the treatment of `pow` and `smul`.
* Use `@[to_additive]` to send `MeasurablePow` to `MeasurableSMul₂`.
* This might require changing the definition (swapping the arguments in the function that is
in the conclusion of `MeasurableSMul`.)
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
variable {α : Type*}
/-!
### Binary operations: `(· + ·)`, `(· * ·)`, `(· - ·)`, `(· / ·)`
-/
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableAdd` if `(· + c)` and `(· + c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (· + ·)` see `MeasurableAdd₂`. -/
class MeasurableAdd (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_const_add : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c + ·)
measurable_add_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· + c)
export MeasurableAdd (measurable_const_add measurable_add_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableAdd₂` if `uncurry (· + ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c + ·)` and `(· + c)` see `MeasurableAdd`. -/
class MeasurableAdd₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_add : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 + p.2
export MeasurableAdd₂ (measurable_add)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableMul` if `(c * ·)` and `(· * c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (*)` see `MeasurableMul₂`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableMul (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_const_mul : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c * ·)
measurable_mul_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· * c)
export MeasurableMul (measurable_const_mul measurable_mul_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableMul₂` if `uncurry (· * ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c * ·)` and `(· * c)` see `MeasurableMul`. -/
@[to_additive MeasurableAdd₂]
class MeasurableMul₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_mul : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 * p.2
export MeasurableMul₂ (measurable_mul)
section Mul
variable {M α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f g : α → M} {μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_mul [MeasurableMul M] (hf : Measurable f) (c : M) :
Measurable fun x => c * f x :=
(measurable_const_mul c).comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_mul [MeasurableMul M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : M) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c * f x) μ :=
(MeasurableMul.measurable_const_mul c).comp_aemeasurable hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem Measurable.mul_const [MeasurableMul M] (hf : Measurable f) (c : M) :
Measurable fun x => f x * c :=
(measurable_mul_const c).comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul_const [MeasurableMul M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : M) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x * c) μ :=
(measurable_mul_const c).comp_aemeasurable hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.mul [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => f a * g a :=
measurable_mul.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
/-- Compositional version of `Measurable.mul` for use by `fun_prop`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))
"Compositional version of `Measurable.add` for use by `fun_prop`."]
lemma Measurable.mul' [MeasurableMul₂ M] {f g : α → β → M} {h : α → β} (hf : Measurable ↿f)
(hg : Measurable ↿g) (hh : Measurable h) : Measurable fun a ↦ (f a * g a) (h a) := by
simp; fun_prop
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul' [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (f * g) μ :=
measurable_mul.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun a => f a * g a) μ :=
measurable_mul.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableMul₂.toMeasurableMul [MeasurableMul₂ M] :
MeasurableMul M :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_const.mul measurable_id, fun _ => measurable_id.mul measurable_const⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableMul {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)] : MeasurableMul (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).const_mul _, fun _ =>
measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).mul_const _⟩
@[to_additive Pi.measurableAdd₂]
instance Pi.measurableMul₂ {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul₂ (α i)] : MeasurableMul₂ (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun _ => measurable_fst.eval.mul measurable_snd.eval⟩
end Mul
/-- A version of `measurable_div_const` that assumes `MeasurableMul` instead of
`MeasurableDiv`. This can be nice to avoid unnecessary type-class assumptions. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `measurable_sub_const` that assumes `MeasurableAdd` instead of
`MeasurableSub`. This can be nice to avoid unnecessary type-class assumptions."]
theorem measurable_div_const' {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableMul G]
(g : G) : Measurable fun h => h / g := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, measurable_mul_const]
/-- This class assumes that the map `β × γ → β` given by `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is measurable. -/
class MeasurablePow (β γ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [Pow β γ] : Prop where
measurable_pow : Measurable fun p : β × γ => p.1 ^ p.2
export MeasurablePow (measurable_pow)
/-- `Monoid.Pow` is measurable. -/
instance Monoid.measurablePow (M : Type*) [Monoid M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul₂ M] :
MeasurablePow M ℕ :=
⟨measurable_from_prod_countable fun n => by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [pow_zero, ← Pi.one_def, measurable_one]
· simp only [pow_succ]
exact ih.mul measurable_id⟩
section Pow
variable {β γ α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [Pow β γ] [MeasurablePow β γ]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]), fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.pow (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => f x ^ g x :=
measurable_pow.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]), fun_prop]
theorem AEMeasurable.pow (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x ^ g x) μ :=
measurable_pow.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem Measurable.pow_const (hf : Measurable f) (c : γ) : Measurable fun x => f x ^ c :=
hf.pow measurable_const
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem AEMeasurable.pow_const (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : γ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x ^ c) μ :=
hf.pow aemeasurable_const
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem Measurable.const_pow (hg : Measurable g) (c : β) : Measurable fun x => c ^ g x :=
measurable_const.pow hg
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_pow (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (c : β) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c ^ g x) μ :=
aemeasurable_const.pow hg
end Pow
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableSub` if `(c - ·)` and `(· - c)` are measurable
functions. For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (-)` see `MeasurableSub₂`. -/
class MeasurableSub (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G] [Sub G] : Prop where
measurable_const_sub : ∀ c : G, Measurable (c - ·)
measurable_sub_const : ∀ c : G, Measurable (· - c)
export MeasurableSub (measurable_const_sub measurable_sub_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableSub₂` if `uncurry (· - ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c - ·)` and `(· - c)` see `MeasurableSub`. -/
class MeasurableSub₂ (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G] [Sub G] : Prop where
measurable_sub : Measurable fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2
export MeasurableSub₂ (measurable_sub)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableDiv` if `(c / ·)` and `(· / c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (· / ·)` see `MeasurableDiv₂`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableDiv (G₀ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G₀] [Div G₀] : Prop where
measurable_const_div : ∀ c : G₀, Measurable (c / ·)
measurable_div_const : ∀ c : G₀, Measurable (· / c)
export MeasurableDiv (measurable_const_div measurable_div_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableDiv₂` if `uncurry (· / ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c / ·)` and `(· / c)` see `MeasurableDiv`. -/
@[to_additive MeasurableSub₂]
class MeasurableDiv₂ (G₀ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G₀] [Div G₀] : Prop where
measurable_div : Measurable fun p : G₀ × G₀ => p.1 / p.2
export MeasurableDiv₂ (measurable_div)
section Div
variable {G α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [Div G] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f g : α → G} {μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_div [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : Measurable f) (c : G) :
Measurable fun x => c / f x :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_const_div c).comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_div [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : G) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c / f x) μ :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_const_div c).comp_aemeasurable hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem Measurable.div_const [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : Measurable f) (c : G) :
Measurable fun x => f x / c :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const c).comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.div_const [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : G) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x / c) μ :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const c).comp_aemeasurable hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.div [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => f a / g a :=
measurable_div.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
lemma Measurable.div' [MeasurableDiv₂ G] {f g : α → β → G} {h : α → β} (hf : Measurable ↿f)
(hg : Measurable ↿g) (hh : Measurable h) : Measurable fun a ↦ (f a / g a) (h a) := by
simp; fun_prop
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.div' [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (f / g) μ :=
measurable_div.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.div [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun a => f a / g a) μ :=
measurable_div.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableDiv₂.toMeasurableDiv [MeasurableDiv₂ G] :
MeasurableDiv G :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_const.div measurable_id, fun _ => measurable_id.div measurable_const⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableDiv {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Div (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableDiv (α i)] : MeasurableDiv (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).const_div _, fun _ =>
measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).div_const _⟩
@[to_additive Pi.measurableSub₂]
instance Pi.measurableDiv₂ {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Div (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableDiv₂ (α i)] : MeasurableDiv₂ (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun _ => measurable_fst.eval.div measurable_snd.eval⟩
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_eq_fun {m : MeasurableSpace α} {E} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E]
[MeasurableSingletonClass E] [MeasurableSub₂ E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } := by
suffices h_set_eq : { x : α | f x = g x } = { x | (f - g) x = (0 : E) } by
rw [h_set_eq]
exact (hf.sub hg) measurableSet_eq
ext
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero]
@[measurability]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun' {β : Type*} [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd β] [Sub β] [OrderedSub β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSub₂ β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β]
{f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet {x | f x = g x} := by
have : {a | f a = g a} = {a | (f - g) a = 0} ∩ {a | (g - f) a = 0} := by
ext
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Pi.sub_apply, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, Set.mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, h.symm.le⟩, fun h ↦ le_antisymm h.1 h.2⟩
rw [this]
exact ((hf.sub hg) (measurableSet_singleton 0)).inter ((hg.sub hf) (measurableSet_singleton 0))
theorem nullMeasurableSet_eq_fun {E} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E] [MeasurableSingletonClass E]
[MeasurableSub₂ E] {f g : α → E} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } μ := by
apply (measurableSet_eq_fun hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk).nullMeasurableSet.congr
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk, hg.ae_eq_mk] with x hfx hgx
change (hf.mk f x = hg.mk g x) = (f x = g x)
simp only [hfx, hgx]
theorem measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {E} [MeasurableSpace E]
[MeasurableSingletonClass E] [Countable E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } := by
have : { x | f x = g x } = ⋃ j, { x | f x = j } ∩ { x | g x = j } := by
ext1 x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_eq_right']
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun j => MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton j)
· exact hg (measurableSet_singleton j)
theorem ae_eq_trim_of_measurable {α E} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E] [MeasurableSingletonClass E] [MeasurableSub₂ E]
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable[m] f) (hg : Measurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm _]
exact @MeasurableSet.compl α _ m (@measurableSet_eq_fun α m E _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hg)
end Div
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableNeg` if `x ↦ -x` is a measurable function. -/
class MeasurableNeg (G : Type*) [Neg G] [MeasurableSpace G] : Prop where
measurable_neg : Measurable (Neg.neg : G → G)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableInv` if `x ↦ x⁻¹` is a measurable function. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableInv (G : Type*) [Inv G] [MeasurableSpace G] : Prop where
measurable_inv : Measurable (Inv.inv : G → G)
export MeasurableInv (measurable_inv)
export MeasurableNeg (measurable_neg)
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) measurableDiv_of_mul_inv (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
[DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableMul G] [MeasurableInv G] : MeasurableDiv G where
measurable_const_div c := by
convert measurable_inv.const_mul c using 1
ext1
apply div_eq_mul_inv
measurable_div_const c := by
convert measurable_id.mul_const c⁻¹ using 1
ext1
apply div_eq_mul_inv
section Inv
variable {G α : Type*} [Inv G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → G} {μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem Measurable.inv (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
measurable_inv.comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop, measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.inv (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ :=
measurable_inv.comp_aemeasurable hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measurable_inv_iff {G : Type*} [InvolutiveInv G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G]
{f : α → G} : (Measurable fun x => (f x)⁻¹) ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem aemeasurable_inv_iff {G : Type*} [InvolutiveInv G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G]
| {f : α → G} : AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias measurable_inv_iff₀ := measurable_inv_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Arithmetic.lean | 398 | 404 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.KummerExtension
/-!
# More results on primitive roots of unity
(We put these in a separate file because of the `KummerExtension` import.)
Assume that `μ` is a primitive `n`th root of unity in an integral domain `R`. Then
$$ \prod_{k=1}^{n-1} (1 - \mu^k) = n \,; $$
see `IsPrimitiveRoot.prod_one_sub_pow_eq_order` and its variant
`IsPrimitiveRoot.prod_pow_sub_one_eq_order` in terms of `∏ (μ^k - 1)`.
We use this to deduce that `n` is divisible by `(μ - 1)^k` in `ℤ[μ] ⊆ R` when `k < n`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
open Finset Polynomial
/-- If `μ` is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`, then `∏(1≤k<n) (1-μ^k) = n`.
| (Stated with `n+1` in place of `n` to avoid the condition `n ≠ 0`.) -/
lemma prod_one_sub_pow_eq_order {n : ℕ} {μ : R} (hμ : IsPrimitiveRoot μ (n + 1)) :
∏ k ∈ range n, (1 - μ ^ (k + 1)) = n + 1 := by
have := X_pow_sub_C_eq_prod hμ n.zero_lt_succ (one_pow (n + 1))
rw [C_1, ← mul_geom_sum, prod_range_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, mul_comm, eq_comm] at this
replace this := mul_right_cancel₀ (Polynomial.X_sub_C_ne_zero 1) this
apply_fun Polynomial.eval 1 at this
simpa only [mul_one, map_pow, eval_prod, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_pow, eval_C, eval_geom_sum,
one_pow, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] using this
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Lemmas.lean | 28 | 37 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
/-!
# Absorption of sets
Let `M` act on `α`, let `A` and `B` be sets in `α`.
We say that `A` *absorbs* `B` if for sufficiently large `a : M`, we have `B ⊆ a • A`.
Formally, "for sufficiently large `a : M`" means "for all but a bounded set of `a`".
Traditionally, this definition is formulated
for the action of a (semi)normed ring on a module over that ring.
We formulate it in a more general settings for two reasons:
- this way we don't have to depend on metric spaces, normed rings etc;
- some proofs look nicer with this definition than with something like
`∃ r : ℝ, ∀ a : R, r ≤ ‖a‖ → B ⊆ a • A`.
If `M` is a `GroupWithZero` (e.g., a division ring),
the sets absorbing a given set form a filter, see `Filter.absorbing`.
## Implementation notes
For now, all theorems assume that we deal with (a generalization of) a module over a division ring.
Some lemmas have multiplicative versions for `MulDistribMulAction`s.
They can be added later when someone needs them.
## Keywords
absorbs, absorbent
-/
assert_not_exists Real
open Set Bornology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
section Defs
variable (M : Type*) {α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α]
/-- A set `s` absorbs another set `t` if `t` is contained in all scalings of `s`
by all but a bounded set of elements. -/
def Absorbs (s t : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s
/-- A set is *absorbent* if it absorbs every singleton. -/
def Absorbent (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x, Absorbs M s {x}
end Defs
namespace Absorbs
section SMul
variable {M α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Set α} {S T : Set (Set α)}
protected lemma empty : Absorbs M s ∅ := by simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma eventually (h : Absorbs M s t) : ∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s := h
@[simp] lemma of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace M] : Absorbs M s t := by simp [Absorbs]
lemma mono_left (h : Absorbs M s₁ t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Absorbs M s₂ t :=
h.mono fun _a ha ↦ ha.trans <| smul_set_mono hs
lemma mono_right (h : Absorbs M s t₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s t₂ :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ ht.trans
lemma mono (h : Absorbs M s₁ t₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s₂ t₂ :=
(h.mono_left hs).mono_right ht
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_union : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) ↔ Absorbs M s t₁ ∧ Absorbs M s t₂ := by
simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma union (h₁ : Absorbs M s t₁) (h₂ : Absorbs M s t₂) : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
absorbs_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.absorbs_sUnion {T : Set (Set α)} (hT : T.Finite) :
Absorbs M s (⋃₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Absorbs M s t := by
simp [Absorbs, hT]
protected lemma sUnion (hT : T.Finite) (hs : ∀ t ∈ T, Absorbs M s t) :
Absorbs M s (⋃₀ T) :=
hT.absorbs_sUnion.2 hs
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {t : ι → Set α} :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, Absorbs M s (t i) :=
(finite_range t).absorbs_sUnion.trans forall_mem_range
protected alias ⟨_, iUnion⟩ := absorbs_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.absorbs_biUnion {ι : Type*} {t : ι → Set α} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i ∈ I, t i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, Absorbs M s (t i) := by
simp [Absorbs, hI]
protected alias ⟨_, biUnion⟩ := Set.Finite.absorbs_biUnion
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_biUnion_finset {ι : Type*} {t : ι → Set α} {I : Finset ι} :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i ∈ I, t i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, Absorbs M s (t i) :=
I.finite_toSet.absorbs_biUnion
protected alias ⟨_, biUnion_finset⟩ := absorbs_biUnion_finset
end SMul
section AddZero
variable {M E : Type*} [Bornology M] {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set E}
protected lemma add [AddZeroClass E] [DistribSMul M E]
(h₁ : Absorbs M s₁ t₁) (h₂ : Absorbs M s₂ t₂) : Absorbs M (s₁ + s₂) (t₁ + t₂) :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.eventually.mono fun x hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by rw [smul_add]; exact add_subset_add hx₁ hx₂
protected lemma zero [Zero E] [SMulZeroClass M E] {s : Set E} (hs : 0 ∈ s) : Absorbs M s 0 :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ zero_subset.2 <| zero_mem_smul_set hs
end AddZero
end Absorbs
section GroupWithZero
variable {G₀ α : Type*} [GroupWithZero G₀] [Bornology G₀] [MulAction G₀ α]
{s t u : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)}
@[simp]
| protected lemma Absorbs.univ : Absorbs G₀ univ s :=
(eventually_ne_cobounded 0).mono fun a ha ↦ by rw [smul_set_univ₀ ha]; apply subset_univ
| Mathlib/Topology/Bornology/Absorbs.lean | 139 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Parity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Defs
/-!
# The upper half plane and its automorphisms
This file defines `UpperHalfPlane` to be the upper half plane in `ℂ`.
We furthermore equip it with the structure of a `GLPos 2 ℝ` action by
fractional linear transformations.
We define the notation `ℍ` for the upper half plane available in the locale
`UpperHalfPlane` so as not to conflict with the quaternions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Matrix Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
open scoped MatrixGroups
/-- The open upper half plane, denoted as `ℍ` within the `UpperHalfPlane` namespace -/
def UpperHalfPlane :=
{ point : ℂ // 0 < point.im }
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UpperHalfPlane] notation "ℍ" => UpperHalfPlane
open UpperHalfPlane
namespace UpperHalfPlane
/-- The coercion first into an element of `GL(2, ℝ)⁺`, then `GL(2, ℝ)` and finally a 2 × 2
matrix.
This notation is scoped in namespace `UpperHalfPlane`. -/
scoped notation:1024 "↑ₘ" A:1024 =>
(((A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : GL (Fin 2) ℝ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) _)
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun GL(2, ℝ)⁺ fun _ => Fin 2 → Fin 2 → ℝ where coe A := ↑ₘA
/-- The coercion into an element of `GL(2, R)` and finally a 2 × 2 matrix over `R`. This is
similar to `↑ₘ`, but without positivity requirements, and allows the user to specify the ring `R`,
which can be useful to help Lean elaborate correctly.
This notation is scoped in namespace `UpperHalfPlane`. -/
scoped notation:1024 "↑ₘ[" R "]" A:1024 =>
((A : GL (Fin 2) R) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R)
/-- Canonical embedding of the upper half-plane into `ℂ`. -/
@[coe] protected def coe (z : ℍ) : ℂ := z.1
instance : CoeOut ℍ ℂ := ⟨UpperHalfPlane.coe⟩
instance : Inhabited ℍ :=
⟨⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩⟩
@[ext] theorem ext {a b : ℍ} (h : (a : ℂ) = b) : a = b := Subtype.eq h
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ext_iff' {a b : ℍ} : (a : ℂ) = b ↔ a = b := UpperHalfPlane.ext_iff.symm
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℍ ((↑) : ℍ → ℂ) fun z => 0 < z.im :=
Subtype.canLift fun (z : ℂ) => 0 < z.im
/-- Imaginary part -/
def im (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).im
/-- Real part -/
def re (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).re
/-- Extensionality lemma in terms of `UpperHalfPlane.re` and `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
theorem ext' {a b : ℍ} (hre : a.re = b.re) (him : a.im = b.im) : a = b :=
ext <| Complex.ext hre him
/-- Constructor for `UpperHalfPlane`. It is useful if `⟨z, h⟩` makes Lean use a wrong
typeclass instance. -/
def mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : ℍ :=
⟨z, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_im (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).im = z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_re (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_re (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_im (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).im = z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h : ℂ) = z :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_mk_subtype {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) :
UpperHalfPlane.coe ⟨z, hz⟩ = z := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (z : ℍ) (h : 0 < (z : ℂ).im := z.2) : mk z h = z :=
rfl
theorem re_add_im (z : ℍ) : (z.re + z.im * Complex.I : ℂ) = z :=
Complex.re_add_im z
theorem im_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < z.im :=
z.2
theorem im_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : z.im ≠ 0 :=
z.im_pos.ne'
theorem ne_zero (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
mt (congr_arg Complex.im) z.im_ne_zero
/-- Define I := √-1 as an element on the upper half plane. -/
def I : ℍ := ⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma I_im : I.im = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma I_re : I.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_I : I = Complex.I := rfl
end UpperHalfPlane
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.im _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneIm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.im $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(@UpperHalfPlane.im_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.im"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.coe`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.coe _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneCoe : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℂ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.coe $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonzero q(@UpperHalfPlane.ne_zero $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.coe"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace UpperHalfPlane
theorem normSq_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) := by
rw [Complex.normSq_pos]; exact z.ne_zero
theorem normSq_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
(normSq_pos z).ne'
theorem im_inv_neg_coe_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < (-z : ℂ)⁻¹.im := by
simpa [neg_div] using div_pos z.property (normSq_pos z)
lemma ne_nat (z : ℍ) : ∀ n : ℕ, z.1 ≠ n := by
intro n
have h1 := z.2
aesop
lemma ne_int (z : ℍ) : ∀ n : ℤ, z.1 ≠ n := by
intro n
have h1 := z.2
aesop
/-- Numerator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def num (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ := g 0 0 * z + g 0 1
/-- Denominator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def denom (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ := g 1 0 * z + g 1 1
theorem linear_ne_zero (cd : Fin 2 → ℝ) (z : ℍ) (h : cd ≠ 0) : (cd 0 : ℂ) * z + cd 1 ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
have : cd 0 = 0 := by
-- we will need this twice
apply_fun Complex.im at h
simpa only [z.im_ne_zero, Complex.add_im, add_zero, coe_im, zero_mul, or_false,
Complex.ofReal_im, Complex.zero_im, Complex.mul_im, mul_eq_zero] using h
simp only [this, zero_mul, Complex.ofReal_zero, zero_add, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
at h
ext i
fin_cases i <;> assumption
theorem denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : denom g z ≠ 0 := by
intro H
have DET := (mem_glpos _).1 g.prop
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply] at DET
obtain hg | hz : g 1 0 = 0 ∨ z.im = 0 := by simpa [num, denom] using congr_arg Complex.im H
· simp only [hg, Complex.ofReal_zero, denom, zero_mul, zero_add, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] at H
simp only [Matrix.det_fin_two g.1.1, H, hg, mul_zero, sub_zero, lt_self_iff_false] at DET
· exact z.prop.ne' hz
theorem normSq_denom_pos (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z)
theorem normSq_denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (denom g z) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (normSq_denom_pos g z)
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux' (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ :=
num g z / denom g z
theorem smulAux'_im (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(smulAux' g z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
simp only [smulAux', num, denom, Complex.div_im, Complex.add_im, Complex.mul_im,
Complex.ofReal_re, coe_im, Complex.ofReal_im, coe_re, zero_mul, add_zero, Complex.add_re,
Complex.mul_re, sub_zero, ← sub_div, g.1.1.det_fin_two]
ring
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℍ :=
mk (smulAux' g z) <| by
rw [smulAux'_im]
convert mul_pos ((mem_glpos _).1 g.prop)
(div_pos z.im_pos (Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z))) using 1
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply]
ring
theorem denom_cocycle (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
denom (x * y) z = denom x (smulAux y z) * denom y z := by
change _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) * _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [denom, Subgroup.coe_mul, Fin.isValue, Units.val_mul, mul_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ,
Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Finset.sum_singleton, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one,
Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul, num]
ring
theorem mul_smul' (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : smulAux (x * y) z = smulAux x (smulAux y z) := by
ext1
change _ / _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) / _
rw [denom_cocycle]
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [num, Subgroup.coe_mul, Fin.isValue, Units.val_mul, mul_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ,
Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Finset.sum_singleton, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one,
Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul, denom]
ring
/-- The action of `GLPos 2 ℝ` on the upper half-plane by fractional linear transformations. -/
instance : MulAction GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul := smulAux
one_smul z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _
simp [num, denom]
mul_smul := mul_smul'
instance SLAction {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] : MulAction SL(2, R) ℍ :=
MulAction.compHom ℍ <| SpecialLinearGroup.toGLPos.comp <| map (algebraMap R ℝ)
-- Porting note: in the statement, we used to have coercions `↑· : ℝ`
-- rather than `algebraMap R ℝ ·`.
theorem specialLinearGroup_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] (g : SL(2, R)) (z : ℍ) :
g • z =
mk
(((algebraMap R ℝ (g 0 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (g 0 1) : ℂ)) /
((algebraMap R ℝ (g 1 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (g 1 1) : ℂ)))
(g • z).property :=
rfl
variable (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul : ↑(g • z) = num g z / denom g z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem re_smul : (g • z).re = (num g z / denom g z).re :=
rfl
theorem im_smul : (g • z).im = (num g z / denom g z).im :=
rfl
theorem im_smul_eq_div_normSq : (g • z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
smulAux'_im g z
theorem c_mul_im_sq_le_normSq_denom : (g 1 0 * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
set c := g 1 0
set d := g 1 1
calc
(c * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ (c * z.im) ^ 2 + (c * z.re + d) ^ 2 := by nlinarith
_ = Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by dsimp [c, d, denom, Complex.normSq]; ring
@[simp]
theorem neg_smul : -g • z = g • z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _ / _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [num, denom, Complex.ofReal_neg, neg_mul, GLPos.coe_neg_GL, Units.val_neg, neg_apply]
ring_nf
lemma denom_one : denom 1 z = 1 := by
simp [denom]
section PosRealAction
instance posRealAction : MulAction { x : ℝ // 0 < x } ℍ where
smul x z := mk ((x : ℝ) • (z : ℂ)) <| by simpa using mul_pos x.2 z.2
one_smul _ := Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ _
mul_smul x y z := Subtype.ext <| mul_smul (x : ℝ) y (z : ℂ)
variable (x : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_pos_real_smul : ↑(x • z) = (x : ℝ) • (z : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_real_im : (x • z).im = x * z.im :=
Complex.smul_im _ _
@[simp]
theorem pos_real_re : (x • z).re = x * z.re :=
Complex.smul_re _ _
end PosRealAction
section RealAddAction
instance : AddAction ℝ ℍ where
vadd x z := mk (x + z) <| by simpa using z.im_pos
zero_vadd _ := Subtype.ext <| by simp [HVAdd.hVAdd]
add_vadd x y z := Subtype.ext <| by simp [HVAdd.hVAdd, add_assoc]
variable (x : ℝ) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_vadd : ↑(x +ᵥ z) = (x + z : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vadd_re : (x +ᵥ z).re = x + z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vadd_im : (x +ᵥ z).im = z.im :=
zero_add _
end RealAddAction
/- these next few lemmas are *not* flagged `@simp` because of the constructors on the RHS;
instead we use the versions with coercions to `ℂ` as simp lemmas instead. -/
theorem modular_S_smul (z : ℍ) : ModularGroup.S • z = mk (-z : ℂ)⁻¹ z.im_inv_neg_coe_pos := by
rw [specialLinearGroup_apply]; simp [ModularGroup.S, neg_div, inv_neg, toGL]
theorem modular_T_zpow_smul (z : ℍ) (n : ℤ) : ModularGroup.T ^ n • z = (n : ℝ) +ᵥ z := by
rw [UpperHalfPlane.ext_iff, coe_vadd, add_comm, specialLinearGroup_apply, coe_mk]
simp [toGL, ModularGroup.coe_T_zpow,
of_apply, cons_val_zero, algebraMap.coe_one, Complex.ofReal_one, one_mul, cons_val_one,
head_cons, algebraMap.coe_zero, zero_mul, zero_add, div_one]
theorem modular_T_smul (z : ℍ) : ModularGroup.T • z = (1 : ℝ) +ᵥ z := by
simpa only [Int.cast_one] using modular_T_zpow_smul z 1
theorem exists_SL2_smul_eq_of_apply_zero_one_eq_zero (g : SL(2, ℝ)) (hc : g 1 0 = 0) :
∃ (u : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (v : ℝ), (g • · : ℍ → ℍ) = (v +ᵥ ·) ∘ (u • ·) := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, rfl⟩ := g.fin_two_exists_eq_mk_of_apply_zero_one_eq_zero hc
refine ⟨⟨_, mul_self_pos.mpr ha⟩, b * a, ?_⟩
ext1 ⟨z, hz⟩; ext1
suffices ↑a * z * a + b * a = b * a + a * a * z by
simpa [toGL, specialLinearGroup_apply, add_mul]
ring
theorem exists_SL2_smul_eq_of_apply_zero_one_ne_zero (g : SL(2, ℝ)) (hc : g 1 0 ≠ 0) :
∃ (u : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (v w : ℝ),
(g • · : ℍ → ℍ) =
(w +ᵥ ·) ∘ (ModularGroup.S • · : ℍ → ℍ) ∘ (v +ᵥ · : ℍ → ℍ) ∘ (u • · : ℍ → ℍ) := by
have h_denom := denom_ne_zero g
induction g using Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.fin_two_induction with | _ a b c d h => ?_
replace hc : c ≠ 0 := by simpa using hc
refine ⟨⟨_, mul_self_pos.mpr hc⟩, c * d, a / c, ?_⟩
ext1 ⟨z, hz⟩; ext1
suffices (↑a * z + b) / (↑c * z + d) = a / c - (c * d + ↑c * ↑c * z)⁻¹ by
simpa only [modular_S_smul, inv_neg, Function.comp_apply, coe_vadd, Complex.ofReal_mul,
coe_pos_real_smul, Complex.real_smul, Complex.ofReal_div, coe_mk]
replace hc : (c : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
replace h_denom : ↑c * z + d ≠ 0 := by simpa using h_denom ⟨z, hz⟩
have h_aux : (c : ℂ) * d + ↑c * ↑c * z ≠ 0 := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_add, add_comm]
exact mul_ne_zero hc h_denom
replace h : (a * d - b * c : ℂ) = (1 : ℂ) := by norm_cast
field_simp
linear_combination (-(z * (c : ℂ) ^ 2) - c * d) * h
end UpperHalfPlane
namespace ModularGroup -- results specific to `SL(2, ℤ)`
section ModularScalarTowers
/-- Canonical embedding of `SL(2, ℤ)` into `GL(2, ℝ)⁺`. -/
@[coe]
def coe (g : SL(2, ℤ)) : GL(2, ℝ)⁺ := ((g : SL(2, ℝ)) : GL(2, ℝ)⁺)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] noncomputable alias coe' := coe
instance : Coe SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨coe⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply_complex {g : SL(2, ℤ)} {i j : Fin 2} :
(Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe g) i j = (Subtype.val g i j : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] alias coe'_apply_complex := coe_apply_complex
@[simp]
theorem det_coe {g : SL(2, ℤ)} : det (Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe g) = 1 := by
simp only [SpecialLinearGroup.coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, SpecialLinearGroup.det_coe, coe]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] alias det_coe' := det_coe
lemma coe_one : coe 1 = 1 := by
simp only [coe, map_one]
instance SLOnGLPos : SMul SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨fun s g => s * g⟩
theorem SLOnGLPos_smul_apply (s : SL(2, ℤ)) (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(s • g) • z = ((s : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) * g) • z :=
rfl
instance SL_to_GL_tower : IsScalarTower SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul_assoc s g z := by
simp only [SLOnGLPos_smul_apply]
apply mul_smul'
end ModularScalarTowers
section SLModularAction
| variable (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Basic.lean | 451 | 453 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric IsLocalRing
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt : Type := {x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1}
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
variable {p} {x y : ℤ_[p]}
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by norm_num
one_mem' := by norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one₀ hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
variable {p}
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (subring p)
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
lemma coe_ne_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := by simp
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h :=
Nat.cast_injective (R := ℚ_[p]) (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by simp
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p)
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℤ_[p] := IsUltrametricDist.subtype _
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p} in
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] where
__ := instCommRing
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ rfl
norm_mul_le := by simp [norm_def]
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance : NormMulClass ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun x y ↦ by simp [norm_def]⟩
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
variable {p}
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
@[simp]
theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
theorem norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_padic_norm {q : ℚ_[p]} (hq : ‖q‖ ≤ 1) : @norm ℤ_[p] _ ⟨q, hq⟩ = ‖q‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := padicNormE.norm_p
theorem norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by simp
private def cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq (f : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm) : CauSeq ℚ_[p] fun a => ‖a‖ :=
⟨fun n => f n, fun _ hε => by simpa [norm, norm_def] using f.cauchy hε⟩
variable (p)
instance complete : CauSeq.IsComplete ℤ_[p] norm :=
⟨fun f =>
have hqn : ‖CauSeq.lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f)‖ ≤ 1 :=
padicNormE_lim_le zero_lt_one fun _ => norm_le_one _
⟨⟨_, hqn⟩, fun ε => by
simpa [norm, norm_def] using CauSeq.equiv_lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f) ε⟩⟩
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℝ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹
use k
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ hε (zpow_pos _ _)]
· rw [zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hk
norm_cast
apply le_of_lt
convert Nat.lt_pow_self _ using 1
exact hp.1.one_lt
· exact mod_cast hp.1.pos
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt_rat {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := @exists_pow_neg_lt p _ ε (mod_cast hε)
use k
rw [show (p : ℝ) = (p : ℚ) by simp] at hk
exact mod_cast hk
variable {p}
theorem norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k by rwa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd k
theorem norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd {k : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k by
simpa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd _ _
/-! ### Valuation on `ℤ_[p]` -/
lemma valuation_coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
have := x.2
rwa [Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx, zpow_le_one_iff_right₀, neg_nonpos]
at this
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
/-- `PadicInt.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` to `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) : ℕ := (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation.toNat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma valuation_coe (x : ℤ_[p]) : (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation = x.valuation := by
simp [valuation, valuation_coe_nonneg]
|
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℤ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [valuation]
lemma le_valuation_add (hxy : x + y ≠ 0) : min x.valuation y.valuation ≤ (x + y).valuation := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 276 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCocycles A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCocycles A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCocycles A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f g⁻¹) = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_cancel g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles (x : A) :
dZero A x ∈ oneCocycles A :=
congr($(dOne_comp_dZero A) x)
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
f (g * h) = f g + f h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ofMul_mul, map_add,
oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f (Additive.ofMul h)),
add_comm (f (Additive.ofMul g))]
variable (A) in
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `Z¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
@[simps] def oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial [hA : A.IsTrivial] :
oneCocycles A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ Additive.toMul
map_zero' := oneCocycles_map_one f
map_add' := oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial f }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f :=
{ val := f
property := mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom f }
left_inv f := by ext; rfl
right_inv f := by ext; rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCocycles A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCocycles A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : twoCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCocycles A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
theorem mem_twoCocycles_def (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) - f (g * h, j) + f (g, h * j) - f (g, h) = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dTwo_apply, Prod.mk.eta, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_twoCocycles_iff (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) =
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j) := by
simp_rw [mem_twoCocycles_def, sub_eq_zero, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_comm,
add_comm (f (_ * _, _))]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_fst (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
have := ((mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 1 1 g).symm
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, one_mul, add_right_inj, this]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_snd (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = A.ρ g (f (1, 1)) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g 1 1
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj, this]
lemma twoCocycles_ρ_map_inv_sub_map_inv (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f (g⁻¹, g)) - f (g, g⁻¹)
= f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, twoCocycles_map_one_fst _ g]
at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
theorem dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles (x : G → A) :
dOne A x ∈ twoCocycles A :=
congr($(dTwo_comp_dOne A) x)
end Cocycles
section Coboundaries
/-- The 1-coboundaries `B¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`A → Fun(G, A)` sending `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
def oneCoboundaries : Submodule k (G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dZero A)
/-- The 2-coboundaries `B²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def twoCoboundaries : Submodule k (G × G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dOne A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCoboundaries A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCoboundaries A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : oneCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
variable (A) in
lemma oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A ≤ oneCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B¹(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z¹(G, A)`. -/
abbrev oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] oneCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles_apply (x : oneCoboundaries A) :
oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
theorem oneCoboundaries_eq_bot_of_isTrivial (A : Rep k G) [A.IsTrivial] :
oneCoboundaries A = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [oneCoboundaries, dZero_eq_zero]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_bot.2 rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCoboundaries A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCoboundaries A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : twoCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) :
f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
variable (A) in
lemma twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A ≤ twoCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B²(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z²(G, A)`. -/
abbrev twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] twoCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles_apply (x : twoCoboundaries A) :
twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
end Coboundaries
section IsCocycle
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) + f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsOneCocycle (f : G → A) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h + f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) + f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) + f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCocycle (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Monoid G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
theorem map_one_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_add] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, add_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← map_one_of_isOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_sub_map_inv_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) - f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
end
end IsCocycle
section IsCoboundary
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : A` such that
`g • x - x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsOneCoboundary (f : G → A) : Prop := ∃ x : A, ∀ g : G, g • x - x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → A` such
that `g • x(h) - x(gh) + x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → A, ∀ g h : G, g • x h - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)
end IsCoboundary
section ofDistribMulAction
variable {k G A : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [Module k A]
[DistribMulAction G A] [SMulCommClass G k A]
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCocycle f :=
fun _ _ => (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf _ _
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-coboundary condition, produces a 1-coboundary for the representation
on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsOneCoboundary {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCocycle f := (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-coboundary condition, produces a 2-coboundary for the
representation on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCoboundariesOfIsTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose,funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
end ofDistribMulAction
/-! The next few sections, until the section `Cohomology`, are a multiplicative copy of the
previous few sections beginning with `IsCocycle`. Unfortunately `@[to_additive]` doesn't work with
scalar actions. -/
section IsMulCocycle
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) * f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCocycle (f : G → M) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h * f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) * f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) * f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCocycle (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) * f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) * f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Monoid G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
theorem map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_mul] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, mul_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, mul_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = (f g)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, ← map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_div_map_inv_of_isMulTwoCocycle
{f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) / f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) / f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact div_eq_div_iff_mul_eq_mul.2 this.symm
end
end IsMulCocycle
section IsMulCoboundary
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : M`
such that `g • x / x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCoboundary (f : G → M) : Prop := ∃ x : M, ∀ g : G, g • x / x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → M` such
that `g • x(h) / x(gh) * x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → M, ∀ g h : G, g • x h / x (g * h) * x g = f (g, h)
end IsMulCoboundary
section ofMulDistribMulAction
variable {G M : Type} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulDistribMulAction G M]
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition, produces a
1-coboundary for the representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsMulOneCoboundary {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isMulOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.ofMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-coboundary condition, produces a
2-coboundary for the representation on `M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfIsMulTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isMulTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.toMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
end ofMulDistribMulAction
section Cohomology
/-- We define the 0th group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H⁰(G, A)`, to be
the invariants of the representation, `Aᴳ`. -/
abbrev H0 := ModuleCat.of k A.ρ.invariants
/-- We define the 1st group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H¹(G, A)`, to be
1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo 1-coboundaries
(i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`). -/
abbrev H1 := (shortComplexH1 A).moduleCatHomology
/-- The quotient map `Z¹(G, A) → H¹(G, A).` -/
abbrev H1π : ModuleCat.of k (oneCocycles A) ⟶ H1 A := (shortComplexH1 A).moduleCatHomologyπ
variable {A} in
lemma H1π_eq_zero_iff (x : oneCocycles A) : H1π A x = 0 ↔ ⇑x ∈ oneCoboundaries A := by
show (LinearMap.range ((dZero A).codRestrict (oneCocycles A) _)).mkQ _ = 0 ↔ _
simp [LinearMap.range_codRestrict, oneCoboundaries]
/-- We define the 2nd group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H²(G, A)`, to be
2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo 2-coboundaries
(i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`). -/
abbrev H2 := (shortComplexH2 A).moduleCatHomology
/-- The quotient map `Z²(G, A) → H²(G, A).` -/
abbrev H2π : ModuleCat.of k (twoCocycles A) ⟶ H2 A := (shortComplexH2 A).moduleCatHomologyπ
variable {A} in
lemma H2π_eq_zero_iff (x : twoCocycles A) : H2π A x = 0 ↔ ⇑x ∈ twoCoboundaries A := by
show (LinearMap.range ((dOne A).codRestrict (twoCocycles A) _)).mkQ _ = 0 ↔ _
simp [LinearMap.range_codRestrict, twoCoboundaries]
end Cohomology
section H0
/-- When the representation on `A` is trivial, then `H⁰(G, A)` is all of `A.` -/
def H0LequivOfIsTrivial [A.IsTrivial] :
H0 A ≃ₗ[k] A := LinearEquiv.ofTop _ (invariants_eq_top A.ρ)
@[simp] theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_eq_subtype [A.IsTrivial] :
H0LequivOfIsTrivial A = A.ρ.invariants.subtype := rfl
theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_apply [A.IsTrivial] (x : H0 A) :
H0LequivOfIsTrivial A x = x := rfl
|
@[simp] theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_symm_apply [A.IsTrivial] (x : A) :
(H0LequivOfIsTrivial A).symm x = x := rfl
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 742 | 744 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
| π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 226 | 228 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Bounds
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.ModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics Topology Nat NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂
(isLittleO_of_tendsto fun _ hn ↦ False.elim <| H.ne' <| pow_eq_zero hn) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
(div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr fun _ ↦ div_pow _ _ _
theorem isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ h ▸ isBigO_refl _ _) fun h ↦ (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).isBigO
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
refine (IsLittleO.of_norm_left ?_).of_norm_right
exact (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
open List in
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
theorem TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
TFAE
[∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a < R, ∃ C : ℝ, (0 < C ∨ 0 < R) ∧ ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n, ∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] := by
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have 1 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
tfae_have 3 → 2
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩
tfae_have 2 → 4 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have 4 → 6
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le] using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne')
tfae_have 6 → 5 := fun ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, C, Or.inl H₀, H⟩
tfae_have 5 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩ => by
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n) with (rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩)
· obtain rfl : f = 0 := by
ext n
simpa using H n
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, isBigO_zero _ _⟩
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
isBigO_of_le' _ fun n ↦ (H n).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le⟩
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have 2 → 8
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn
tfae_have 8 → 7 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩
tfae_have 7 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, A ⟨?_, ha⟩, .of_norm_eventuallyLE H⟩
exact nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans)
tfae_finish
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 1 < r) : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
have : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ ↦ x ^ k) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le
suffices (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =O[atTop] fun n : ℕ ↦ (r' ^ k) ^ n from
this.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr')
conv in (r' ^ _) ^ _ => rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul]
suffices ∀ n : ℕ, ‖(n : R)‖ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ‖(1 : R)‖ * ‖r' ^ n‖ from
(isBigO_of_le' _ this).pow _
intro n
rw [mul_right_comm]
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _))
simpa [_root_.div_eq_inv_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
((↑) : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt R _ 1 _ hr
/-- If `‖r₁‖ < r₂`, then for any natural `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ‖r₁‖ < r₂) :
(fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0
· refine (isLittleO_zero _ _).congr' (mem_atTop_sets.2 <| ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩) EventuallyEq.rfl
simp [zero_pow (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hn), h0]
rw [← Ne, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0
have A : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ (r₂ / ‖r₁‖) ^ n :=
isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h)
suffices (fun n ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ‖r₁‖ ^ n by
simpa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne', div_pow] using A.mul_isBigO this
exact .of_norm_eventuallyLE <| eventually_norm_pow_le r₁
theorem tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_div_nhds_zero
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn |>.ne', h0]⟩)
have hr' : 1 < |r|⁻¹ := (one_lt_inv₀ (abs_pos.2 h0)).2 hr
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
/-- For `k ≠ 0` and a constant `r` the function `r / n ^ k` tends to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_const_div_pow (r : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r / n ^ k) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using Filter.Tendsto.const_div_atTop (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop (R := ℝ).comp
(tendsto_pow_atTop hk) ) r
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`.
This is a specialized version of `tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out
for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one k (abs_lt.2 ⟨neg_one_lt_zero.trans_le hr, h'r⟩)
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one 1 hr
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. This is a specialized version of
`tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one 1 hr h'r
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `‖x‖ < 1` tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] {x : R}
(h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
| apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h
lemma tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] [NormMulClass R]
{x : R} : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ‖x‖ < 1 := by
-- this proof is slightly fiddly since `‖x ^ n‖ = ‖x‖ ^ n` might not hold for `n = 0`
refine ⟨?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one⟩
rw [← abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff,
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
apply Tendsto.congr'
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 1] with n hn
induction n, hn using Nat.le_induction with
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 193 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Monoidal
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories
This file defines rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories and the necessary theory about
exact pairings and duals.
## Main definitions
* `ExactPairing` of two objects of a monoidal category
* Type classes `HasLeftDual` and `HasRightDual` that capture that a pairing exists
* The `rightAdjointMate f` as a morphism `fᘁ : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
* The classes of `RightRigidCategory`, `LeftRigidCategory` and `RigidCategory`
## Main statements
* `comp_rightAdjointMate`: The adjoint mates of the composition is the composition of
adjoint mates.
## Notations
* `η_` and `ε_` denote the coevaluation and evaluation morphism of an exact pairing.
* `Xᘁ` and `ᘁX` denote the right and left dual of an object, as well as the adjoint
mate of a morphism.
## Future work
* Show that `X ⊗ Y` and `Yᘁ ⊗ Xᘁ` form an exact pairing.
* Show that the left adjoint mate of the right adjoint mate of a morphism is the morphism itself.
* Simplify constructions in the case where a symmetry or braiding is present.
* Show that `ᘁ` gives an equivalence of categories `C ≅ (Cᵒᵖ)ᴹᵒᵖ`.
* Define pivotal categories (rigid categories equipped with a natural isomorphism `ᘁᘁ ≅ 𝟙 C`).
## Notes
Although we construct the adjunction `tensorLeft Y ⊣ tensorLeft X` from `ExactPairing X Y`,
this is not a bijective correspondence.
I think the correct statement is that `tensorLeft Y` and `tensorLeft X` are
module endofunctors of `C` as a right `C` module category,
and `ExactPairing X Y` is in bijection with adjunctions compatible with this right `C` action.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rigid+monoidal+category>
## Tags
rigid category, monoidal category
-/
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- An exact pairing is a pair of objects `X Y : C` which admit
a coevaluation and evaluation morphism which fulfill two triangle equalities. -/
class ExactPairing (X Y : C) where
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.coevaluation` instead. -/
coevaluation' : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.evaluation` instead. -/
evaluation' : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C
coevaluation_evaluation' :
Y ◁ coevaluation' ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ evaluation' ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
aesop_cat
evaluation_coevaluation' :
coevaluation' ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ evaluation' = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
aesop_cat
namespace ExactPairing
-- Porting note: as there is no mechanism equivalent to `[]` in Lean 3 to make
-- arguments for class fields explicit,
-- we now repeat all the fields without primes.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Making.20variable.20in.20class.20field.20explicit
variable (X Y : C)
variable [ExactPairing X Y]
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def coevaluation : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y := @coevaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def evaluation : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C := @evaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
@[inherit_doc] notation "η_" => ExactPairing.coevaluation
@[inherit_doc] notation "ε_" => ExactPairing.evaluation
lemma coevaluation_evaluation :
Y ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ X _ ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv :=
coevaluation_evaluation'
lemma evaluation_coevaluation :
η_ _ _ ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ ε_ _ Y = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv :=
evaluation_coevaluation'
lemma coevaluation_evaluation'' :
Y ◁ η_ X Y ⊗≫ ε_ X Y ▷ Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert coevaluation_evaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
lemma evaluation_coevaluation'' :
η_ X Y ▷ X ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert evaluation_coevaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
end ExactPairing
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.coevaluation_evaluation
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.evaluation_coevaluation
instance exactPairingUnit : ExactPairing (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) where
coevaluation' := (ρ_ _).inv
evaluation' := (ρ_ _).hom
coevaluation_evaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
evaluation_coevaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
/-- A class of objects which have a right dual. -/
class HasRightDual (X : C) where
/-- The right dual of the object `X`. -/
rightDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing X rightDual]
/-- A class of objects which have a left dual. -/
class HasLeftDual (Y : C) where
/-- The left dual of the object `X`. -/
leftDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing leftDual Y]
attribute [instance] HasRightDual.exact
attribute [instance] HasLeftDual.exact
open ExactPairing HasRightDual HasLeftDual MonoidalCategory
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596
The overlapping notation for `leftDual` and `leftAdjointMate` become more problematic in
after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596, and we sometimes have to disambiguate with
e.g. `(ᘁX : C)` where previously just `ᘁX` was enough. -/
@[inherit_doc] prefix:1024 "ᘁ" => leftDual
@[inherit_doc] postfix:1024 "ᘁ" => rightDual
instance hasRightDualUnit : HasRightDual (𝟙_ C) where
rightDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasLeftDualUnit : HasLeftDual (𝟙_ C) where
leftDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasRightDualLeftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : HasRightDual ᘁX where
rightDual := X
instance hasLeftDualRightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : HasLeftDual Xᘁ where
leftDual := X
@[simp]
theorem leftDual_rightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : ᘁXᘁ = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightDual_leftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁX)ᘁ = X :=
rfl
/-- The right adjoint mate `fᘁ : Xᘁ ⟶ Yᘁ` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ :=
(ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ _ ◁ f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
/-- The left adjoint mate `ᘁf : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX :=
(λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ _ ≫ (_ ◁ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
@[inherit_doc] notation f "ᘁ" => rightAdjointMate f
@[inherit_doc] notation "ᘁ" f => leftAdjointMate f
@[simp]
theorem rightAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : (𝟙 X)ᘁ = 𝟙 (Xᘁ) := by
simp [rightAdjointMate]
@[simp]
theorem leftAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁ(𝟙 X)) = 𝟙 (ᘁX) := by
simp [leftAdjointMate]
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Xᘁ ⟶ Z} :
fᘁ ≫ g =
(ρ_ (Yᘁ)).inv ≫
_ ◁ η_ X (Xᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ (Yᘁ) Y Z).inv ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ Z).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Yᘁ : C) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ g) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [rightAdjointMate]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def]; monoidal
theorem leftAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : (ᘁX) ⟶ Z} :
(ᘁf) ≫ g =
(λ_ _).inv ≫
η_ (ᘁX : C) X ▷ _ ≫ (g ⊗ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ η_ (ᘁX : C) X ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ g ▷ 𝟙_ C) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [leftAdjointMate]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def']; monoidal
/-- The composition of right adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] [HasRightDual Z]
{f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g)ᘁ = gᘁ ≫ fᘁ := by
rw [rightAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [rightAdjointMate, comp_whiskerRight]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ) ⊗≫ Y ◁ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [tensorHom_def']; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ) ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ) ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ) ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ≫ g ▷ Xᘁ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
/-- The composition of left adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_leftAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] [HasLeftDual Z] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Y ⟶ Z} : (ᘁf ≫ g) = (ᘁg) ≫ ᘁf := by
rw [leftAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [leftAdjointMate, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ ((𝟙_ C) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ▷ Y ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [tensorHom_def]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ (((ᘁX) ⊗ X) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ (Y ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ⊗≫ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)`
by "pulling the string on the left" up or down.
This gives the adjunction `tensorLeftAdjunction Y Y' : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y`.
This adjunction is often referred to as "Frobenius reciprocity" in the
fusion categories / planar algebras / subfactors literature.
-/
def tensorLeftHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) where
toFun f := (λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ f
invFun f := Y' ◁ f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ X ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ▷ X ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ X ≫ (Y ⊗ Y') ◁ f) ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')`
by "pulling the string on the right" up or down.
-/
def tensorRightHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') where
toFun f := (ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ f ▷ _
invFun f := f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Y')) ⊗≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y' ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ Z ◁ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ Y ◁ g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
_ ◁ f ≫ (tensorLeftHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ g ▷ Y' := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
f ▷ Y ≫ (tensorRightHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensorLeft Y'` is left adjoint to `tensorLeft Y`.
-/
def tensorLeftAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality f g }
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensor_right Y` is left adjoint to `tensor_right Y'`.
-/
def tensorRightAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorRight Y ⊣ tensorRight Y' :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality f g }
/--
If `Y` has a left dual `ᘁY`, then it is a closed object, with the internal hom functor `Y ⟶[C] -`
given by left tensoring by `ᘁY`.
This has to be a definition rather than an instance to avoid diamonds, for example between
`category_theory.monoidal_closed.functor_closed` and
`CategoryTheory.Monoidal.functorHasLeftDual`. Moreover, in concrete applications there is often
a more useful definition of the internal hom object than `ᘁY ⊗ X`, in which case the closed
structure shouldn't come from `has_left_dual` (e.g. in the category `FinVect k`, it is more
convenient to define the internal hom as `Y →ₗ[k] X` rather than `ᘁY ⊗ X` even though these are
naturally isomorphic).
-/
def closedOfHasLeftDual (Y : C) [HasLeftDual Y] : Closed Y where
rightAdj := tensorLeft (ᘁY)
adj := tensorLeftAdjunction (ᘁY) Y
/-- `tensorLeftHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the right -/
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv (X ⊗ X') Y Y' (Z ⊗ Z')).symm ((f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom) =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, tensorHom_def']
/-- `tensorRightHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the left -/
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv (X' ⊗ X) Y Y' (Z' ⊗ Z)).symm ((g ⊗ f) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv) =
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (g ⊗ (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f) := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv, tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y' ⟶ Z) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ Y ◁ f) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ f := by
calc
_ = Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X]
[HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ (Xᘁ)) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ fᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X]
[HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ (ᘁY) _ _).symm (η_ (ᘁX : C) X ≫ (ᘁX : C) ◁ f) = (λ_ _).hom ≫ ᘁf := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y ⟶ Z) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ Y _ _).symm (η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ Y') = (λ_ _).hom ≫ f :=
calc
_ = η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual Z] (f : Y ⟶ ᘁZ) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (Z ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = f ≫ (ρ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ : C) Z ▷ Y ≫ ((ᘁZ) ⊗ Z) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ) Z ▷ (ᘁZ) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z) := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ _ ≫ ε_ _ _) = (ᘁf) ≫ (ρ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) ((Yᘁ : C) ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = fᘁ ≫ (λ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] (f : Y ⟶ Xᘁ) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ X ≫ ε_ X (Xᘁ)) = f ≫ (λ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ)) ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (Xᘁ ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ) := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
-- Next four lemmas passing `fᘁ` or `ᘁf` through (co)evaluations.
@[reassoc]
theorem coevaluation_comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
η_ Y (Yᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (fᘁ) = η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ _ := by
apply_fun (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ Y (Yᘁ) _).symm
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftAdjointMate_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
X ◁ (ᘁf) ≫ ε_ _ _ = f ▷ _ ≫ ε_ _ _ := by
apply_fun tensorLeftHomEquiv _ (ᘁX) X _
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem coevaluation_comp_leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ (ᘁf) ▷ Y = η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f := by
apply_fun (tensorRightHomEquiv _ (ᘁY) Y _).symm
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(fᘁ ▷ X) ≫ ε_ X (Xᘁ) = ((Yᘁ) ◁ f) ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) := by
apply_fun tensorRightHomEquiv _ X (Xᘁ) _
simp
/-- Transport an exact pairing across an isomorphism in the first argument. -/
def exactPairingCongrLeft {X X' Y : C} [ExactPairing X' Y] (i : X ≅ X') : ExactPairing X Y where
evaluation' := Y ◁ i.hom ≫ ε_ _ _
coevaluation' := η_ _ _ ≫ i.inv ▷ Y
evaluation_coevaluation' :=
calc
_ = η_ X' Y ▷ X ⊗≫ (i.inv ▷ (Y ⊗ X) ≫ X ◁ (Y ◁ i.hom)) ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X' Y := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ X' Y ▷ X ≫ (X' ⊗ Y) ◁ i.hom) ⊗≫
(i.inv ▷ (Y ⊗ X') ≫ X ◁ ε_ X' Y) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ i.hom ⊗≫ (η_ X' Y ▷ X' ⊗≫ X' ◁ ε_ X' Y) ⊗≫ i.inv ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, ← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (i.hom ≫ i.inv) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
_ = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.hom_inv_id]
monoidal
coevaluation_evaluation' := by
calc
_ = Y ◁ η_ X' Y ≫ Y ◁ (i.inv ≫ i.hom) ▷ Y ⊗≫ ε_ X' Y ▷ Y := by
monoidal
_ = Y ◁ η_ X' Y ⊗≫ ε_ X' Y ▷ Y := by
rw [Iso.inv_hom_id]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
| rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']
monoidal
/-- Transport an exact pairing across an isomorphism in the second argument. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Rigid/Basic.lean | 503 | 506 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 627 | 627 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self f x k using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f x (f x) = f (f x) := by
convert cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self f x 1 using 1
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : cycleOf f x x = f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply
theorem IsCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle]
(hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) : cycleOf f x = f :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
if h : SameCycle f x y then by rw [h.cycleOf_apply]
else by
rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle h,
Classical.not_not.1 (mt ((isCycle_iff_sameCycle hx).1 hf).2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_eq_one_iff (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] : cycleOf f x = 1 ↔ f x = x := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, cycleOf_apply, one_apply]
refine ⟨fun h => (if_pos (SameCycle.refl f x)).symm.trans (h x), fun h y => ?_⟩
by_cases hy : f y = y
· rw [hy, ite_self]
· exact if_neg (mt SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff (by tauto))
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf f (f x) = cycleOf f x :=
(sameCycle_apply_right.2 SameCycle.rfl).symm.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_pow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.pow_left.cycleOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_self_apply_zpow (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℤ) (x : α) :
cycleOf f ((f ^ n) x) = cycleOf f x :=
SameCycle.rfl.zpow_left.cycleOf_eq
protected theorem IsCycle.cycleOf [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] [DecidableEq α]
(hf : IsCycle f) : cycleOf f x = if f x = x then 1 else f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rwa [if_pos hx, cycleOf_eq_one_iff]
· rwa [if_neg hx, hf.cycleOf_eq]
theorem cycleOf_one [DecidableRel (1 : Perm α).SameCycle] (x : α) :
cycleOf 1 x = 1 := (cycleOf_eq_one_iff 1).mpr rfl
theorem isCycle_cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (hx : f x ≠ x) :
IsCycle (cycleOf f x) :=
have : cycleOf f x x ≠ x := by rwa [SameCycle.rfl.cycleOf_apply]
(isCycle_iff_sameCycle this).2 @fun y =>
⟨fun h => mt h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 this, fun h =>
if hxy : SameCycle f x y then
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hxy
⟨i, by rw [cycleOf_zpow_apply_self, hi]⟩
else by
| rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hxy] at h
exact (h rfl).elim⟩
theorem pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
(f ^ (n % orderOf (cycleOf f x))) x = (f ^ n) x := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 160 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ImageToKernel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Exact sequences in abelian categories
In an abelian category, we get several interesting results related to exactness which are not
true in more general settings.
## Main results
* A short complex `S` is exact iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
* If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` has the universal property of the kernel of `g`.
* `f` is a monomorphism iff `kernel.ι f = 0` iff `Exact 0 f`, and `f` is an epimorphism iff
`cokernel.π = 0` iff `Exact f 0`.
* A faithful functor between abelian categories that preserves zero morphisms reflects exact
sequences.
* `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ 0` is exact if and only if the second map is a cokernel of the first, and
`0 ⟶ X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z` is exact if and only if the first map is a kernel of the second.
* A functor `F` such that for all `S`, we have `S.Exact → (S.map F).Exact` preserves both
finite limits and colimits.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace ShortComplex
variable (S : ShortComplex C)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel' : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift]
have : factorThruImage S.f ≫ imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero = kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (kernel.ι _), kernel.lift_ι, imageToKernel',
Category.assoc, image.fac]
constructor
· intro
exact epi_of_epi_fac this
· intro
rw [← this]
apply epi_comp
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel']
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (imageSubobjectIso S.f).symm (kernelSubobjectIso S.g).symm
theorem exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ IsIso (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
apply isIso_of_mono_of_epi
· intro
infer_instance
/-- In an abelian category, a short complex `S` is exact
iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
-/
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : S.Exact ↔ imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g := by
rw [exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
exact Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ S.zero)) (by simp)
· intro h
exact ⟨Subobject.ofLE _ _ h.ge, by ext; simp, by ext; simp⟩
theorem exact_iff_of_forks {cg : KernelFork S.g} (hg : IsLimit cg) {cf : CokernelCofork S.f}
(hf : IsColimit cf) : S.Exact ↔ cg.ι ≫ cf.π = 0 := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero]
let e₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg
let e₂ := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf
have : cg.ι ≫ cf.π = e₁.inv ≫ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f ≫ e₂.hom := by
have eq₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg (.zero)
have eq₂ := IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf (.one)
dsimp at eq₁ eq₂
rw [← eq₁, ← eq₂, Category.assoc]
rw [this, IsIso.comp_left_eq_zero e₁.inv, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero _ e₂.hom]
variable {S}
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.image.ι S.f` is a kernel of `S.g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Abelian.image.ι S.f)
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
exact KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun u hu ↦ kernel.lift (cokernel.π S.f) u
(by rw [← kernel.lift_ι S.g u hu, Category.assoc, h, comp_zero])) (by simp)
(fun _ _ _ hm => by rw [← cancel_mono (Abelian.image.ι S.f), hm, kernel.lift_ι])
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` is a kernel of `g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage' (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Limits.image.ι S.f)
(image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _ h.isLimitImage (Abelian.imageIsoImage S.f).symm <| IsImage.lift_fac _ _
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.coimage.π g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitCoimage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit
(CokernelCofork.ofπ (Abelian.coimage.π S.g) (Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero) :
CokernelCofork S.f) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
refine CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun u hu => cokernel.desc (kernel.ι S.g) u
(by rw [← cokernel.π_desc S.f u hu, ← Category.assoc, h, zero_comp]))
(by simp) ?_
intros _ _ _ _ hm
ext
rw [hm, cokernel.π_desc]
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `factorThruImage g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.factorThruImage S.g)
(comp_factorThruImage_eq_zero S.zero)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _ h.isColimitCoimage (Abelian.coimageIsoImage' S.g) <|
(cancel_mono (Limits.image.ι S.g)).1 <| by simp
theorem exact_kernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk (kernel.ι f) f (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ (kernelIsKernel f)
theorem exact_cokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk f (cokernel.π f) (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f)
variable (S)
theorem exact_iff_exact_image_ι :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk (Abelian.image.ι S.f) S.g
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := Abelian.factorThruImage S.f
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
theorem exact_iff_exact_coimage_π :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk S.f (Abelian.coimage.π S.g)
(Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact := by
symm
exact ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := Abelian.factorThruCoimage S.g }
end ShortComplex
section
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Mono f, kernel.ι f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk (0 : Z ⟶ X) f zero_comp).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := mono_of_kernel_ι_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_mono f, kernel.condition, zero_comp]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_mono _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Epi f, cokernel.π f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := epi_of_cokernel_π_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_epi f, cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_epi _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
end
namespace Functor
section
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [Abelian D]
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
lemma reflects_exact_of_faithful [F.Faithful] (S : ShortComplex C) (hS : (S.map F).Exact) :
S.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at hS ⊢
dsimp at hS
apply F.zero_of_map_zero
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ :=
kernel.lift' (F.map S.g) (F.map (kernel.ι S.g))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, kernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
cokernel.desc' (F.map S.f) (F.map (cokernel.π S.f))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, cokernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
rw [F.map_comp, ← hl, ← hk, Category.assoc, reassoc_of% hS, zero_comp, comp_zero]
end
end Functor
namespace Functor
open Limits Abelian
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B]
variable [Abelian A] [Abelian B]
variable (L : A ⥤ B)
section
variable [L.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
variable (hL : ∀ (S : ShortComplex A), S.Exact → (S.map L).Exact)
include hL
open ZeroObject
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves monomorphisms. -/
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesMonomorphisms where
preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_mono (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_mono f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
exact ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves epimorphisms. -/
theorem preservesEpimorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesEpimorphisms where
preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_epi (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_epi f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
exact ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
/-- A functor which preserves the exactness of short complexes preserves homology. -/
lemma preservesHomology_of_map_exact : L.PreservesHomology where
preservesCokernels X Y f := by
have := preservesEpimorphisms_of_map_exact _ hL
apply preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone (cokernelIsCokernel f)
apply (CokernelCofork.isColimitMapCoconeEquiv _ L).2
have : Epi ((ShortComplex.mk _ _ (cokernel.condition f)).map L).g := by
dsimp
infer_instance
exact (hL (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (cokernel.condition f))
| (ShortComplex.exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f))).gIsCokernel
preservesKernels X Y f := by
have := preservesMonomorphisms_of_map_exact _ hL
apply preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (kernelIsKernel f)
apply (KernelFork.isLimitMapConeEquiv _ L).2
have : Mono ((ShortComplex.mk _ _ (kernel.condition f)).map L).f := by
dsimp
infer_instance
exact (hL (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (kernel.condition f))
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 253 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) {Y} (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun _ hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) {X} (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 y` for all `y` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `t ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `t ×ˢ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set Y} {X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
-- TODO: Is there a way to prove directly the `inf` version and then deduce the `Prod` one ?
-- That would seem a bit more natural.
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ⊓ l := by
have : ∀ f : Filter X, f ⊓ l = comap (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (f ×ˢ l) := fun f ↦ by
simpa only [comap_prod] using congrArg₂ (· ⊓ ·) comap_id.symm comap_id.symm
simp_rw [this, ← comap_iSup, hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup]
theorem IsCompact.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ x ∈ K, l ⊓ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [inf_comm l, hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup]
/-- If `s : Set X` belongs to `𝓝 x ⊓ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `T ∈ l` such that `U ∩ T ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_inf_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l :=
(hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- If `s : Set S` belongs to `l ⊓ 𝓝 x` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `T ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `T ∩ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_inf_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- To show that `∀ y ∈ K, P x y` holds for `x` close enough to `x₀` when `K` is compact,
it is sufficient to show that for all `y₀ ∈ K` there `P x y` holds for `(x, y)` close enough
to `(x₀, y₀)`.
Provided for backwards compatibility,
see `IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall` for a stronger statement.
-/
theorem IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually {x₀ : X} {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K)
{P : X → Y → Prop} (hP : ∀ y ∈ K, ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x₀, y), P z.1 z.2) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ y ∈ K, P x y := by
simp only [nhds_prod_eq, ← eventually_iSup, ← hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup] at hP
exact hP.curry.mono fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhdsSet
theorem isCompact_empty : IsCompact (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf hsf =>
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
theorem isCompact_singleton {x : X} : IsCompact ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf hfa =>
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isCompact (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsCompact s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isCompact_empty fun _ => isCompact_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) : IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'.2 fun l hl => by
rw [Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hs] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨i, his, hi⟩
rcases (hf i his).ultrafilter_le_nhds _ (le_principal_iff.2 hi) with ⟨x, hxi, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, his, hxi⟩, hlx⟩
theorem Finset.isCompact_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) :
IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isCompact_biUnion hf
theorem isCompact_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsCompact (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isCompact_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite) (hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsCompact s) :
IsCompact (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isCompact_biUnion hc
theorem isCompact_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Finite ι] (h : ∀ i, IsCompact (f i)) :
IsCompact (⋃ i, f i) :=
(finite_range f).isCompact_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
@[simp] theorem Set.Finite.isCompact (hs : s.Finite) : IsCompact s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isCompact_biUnion fun _ _ => isCompact_singleton
theorem IsCompact.finite_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsCompact s) : s.Finite := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, _, hst⟩
simp only [← t.set_biUnion_coe, biUnion_of_singleton] at hst
exact t.finite_toSet.subset hst
theorem isCompact_iff_finite [DiscreteTopology X] : IsCompact s ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => h.finite_of_discrete, fun h => h.isCompact⟩
theorem IsCompact.union (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IsCompact (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isCompact_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsCompact.insert (hs : IsCompact s) (a) : IsCompact (insert a s) :=
isCompact_singleton.union hs
-- TODO: reformulate using `𝓝ˢ`
/-- If `V : ι → Set X` is a decreasing family of closed compact sets then any neighborhood of
`⋂ i, V i` contains some `V i`. We assume each `V i` is compact *and* closed because `X` is
not assumed to be Hausdorff. See `exists_subset_nhd_of_compact` for version assuming this. -/
theorem exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact' [Nonempty ι] {V : ι → Set X}
(hV : Directed (· ⊇ ·) V) (hV_cpct : ∀ i, IsCompact (V i)) (hV_closed : ∀ i, IsClosed (V i))
{U : Set X} (hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U := by
obtain ⟨W, hsubW, W_op, hWU⟩ := exists_open_set_nhds hU
suffices ∃ i, V i ⊆ W from this.imp fun i hi => hi.trans hWU
by_contra! H
replace H : ∀ i, (V i ∩ Wᶜ).Nonempty := fun i => Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff.mpr (H i)
have : (⋂ i, V i ∩ Wᶜ).Nonempty := by
refine
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _ (fun i j => ?_) H
(fun i => (hV_cpct i).inter_right W_op.isClosed_compl) fun i =>
(hV_closed i).inter W_op.isClosed_compl
rcases hV i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
refine ⟨k, ⟨fun x => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩⟩ <;> simp only [and_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_compl_iff] <;>
tauto
have : ¬⋂ i : ι, V i ⊆ W := by simpa [← iInter_inter, inter_compl_nonempty_iff]
contradiction
namespace Filter
theorem hasBasis_cocompact : (cocompact X).HasBasis IsCompact compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isCompact_empty⟩
theorem mem_cocompact : s ∈ cocompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_cocompact.mem_iff
theorem mem_cocompact' : s ∈ cocompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_cocompact.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsCompact.compl_mem_cocompact (hs : IsCompact s) : sᶜ ∈ Filter.cocompact X :=
hasBasis_cocompact.mem_of_mem hs
theorem cocompact_le_cofinite : cocompact X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isCompact.compl_mem_cocompact
theorem cocompact_eq_cofinite (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] :
cocompact X = cofinite := by
simp only [cocompact, hasBasis_cofinite.eq_biInf, isCompact_iff_finite]
/-- A filter is disjoint from the cocompact filter if and only if it contains a compact set. -/
theorem disjoint_cocompact_left (f : Filter X) :
Disjoint (Filter.cocompact X) f ↔ ∃ K ∈ f, IsCompact K := by
simp_rw [hasBasis_cocompact.disjoint_iff_left, compl_compl]
tauto
/-- A filter is disjoint from the cocompact filter if and only if it contains a compact set. -/
theorem disjoint_cocompact_right (f : Filter X) :
Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X) ↔ ∃ K ∈ f, IsCompact K := by
simp_rw [hasBasis_cocompact.disjoint_iff_right, compl_compl]
tauto
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cocompact {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (cocompact X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) : IsCompact (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_cocompact.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cofinite {f : ι → X} {x} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 x)) :
IsCompact (insert x (range f)) := by
letI : TopologicalSpace ι := ⊥; haveI h : DiscreteTopology ι := ⟨rfl⟩
rw [← cocompact_eq_cofinite ι] at hf
exact hf.isCompact_insert_range_of_cocompact continuous_of_discreteTopology
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range {f : ℕ → X} {x} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) :
IsCompact (insert x (range f)) :=
Filter.Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cofinite <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop.symm ▸ hf
theorem hasBasis_coclosedCompact :
(Filter.coclosedCompact X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedCompact, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isCompact_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
/-- A set belongs to `coclosedCompact` if and only if the closure of its complement is compact. -/
theorem mem_coclosedCompact_iff :
s ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ IsCompact (closure sᶜ) := by
refine hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_iff.trans ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ⟨htcl, htco⟩, hst⟩
exact htco.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure <|
closure_minimal (compl_subset_comm.2 hst) htcl
· exact ⟨closure sᶜ, ⟨isClosed_closure, h⟩, compl_subset_comm.2 subset_closure⟩
/-- Complement of a set belongs to `coclosedCompact` if and only if its closure is compact. -/
theorem compl_mem_coclosedCompact : sᶜ ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ IsCompact (closure s) := by
rw [mem_coclosedCompact_iff, compl_compl]
theorem cocompact_le_coclosedCompact : cocompact X ≤ coclosedCompact X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
end Filter
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_coclosedCompact_of_isClosed (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedCompact X :=
hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
namespace Bornology
variable (X) in
/-- Sets that are contained in a compact set form a bornology. Its `cobounded` filter is
`Filter.cocompact`. See also `Bornology.relativelyCompact` the bornology of sets with compact
closure. -/
def inCompact : Bornology X where
cobounded' := Filter.cocompact X
le_cofinite' := Filter.cocompact_le_cofinite
theorem inCompact.isBounded_iff : @IsBounded _ (inCompact X) s ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
change sᶜ ∈ Filter.cocompact X ↔ _
rw [Filter.mem_cocompact]
simp
end Bornology
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets, then the set neighborhoods filter of `s ×ˢ t`
is the product of set neighborhoods filters for `s` and `t`.
For general sets, only the `≤` inequality holds, see `nhdsSet_prod_le`. -/
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq {t : Set Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ t) = 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := by
simp_rw [hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, ht.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup, nhdsSet, sSup_image, biSup_prod,
nhds_prod_eq]
theorem nhdsSet_prod_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {f : Filter Y} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact Y)) :
𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ Set.univ) := by
obtain ⟨K, hKf, hK⟩ := (disjoint_cocompact_right f).mp hf
calc
𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ f
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓟 K := Filter.prod_mono_right _ (Filter.le_principal_iff.mpr hKf)
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K := Filter.prod_mono_right _ principal_le_nhdsSet
_ = 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ K) := (hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq hK).symm
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ Set.univ) := nhdsSet_mono (prod_mono_right le_top)
theorem prod_nhdsSet_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {t : Set Y} {f : Filter X} (ht : IsCompact t)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X)) :
f ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t ≤ 𝓝ˢ (Set.univ ×ˢ t) := by
obtain ⟨K, hKf, hK⟩ := (disjoint_cocompact_right f).mp hf
calc
f ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t
_ ≤ (𝓟 K) ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := Filter.prod_mono_left _ (Filter.le_principal_iff.mpr hKf)
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ K ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := Filter.prod_mono_left _ principal_le_nhdsSet
_ = 𝓝ˢ (K ×ˢ t) := (hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq ht).symm
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (Set.univ ×ˢ t) := nhdsSet_mono (prod_mono_left le_top)
theorem nhds_prod_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {f : Filter Y} (x : X)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact Y)) :
𝓝 x ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓝ˢ ({x} ×ˢ Set.univ) := by
simpa using nhdsSet_prod_le_of_disjoint_cocompact isCompact_singleton hf
theorem prod_nhds_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {f : Filter X} (y : Y)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X)) :
f ×ˢ 𝓝 y ≤ 𝓝ˢ (Set.univ ×ˢ {y}) := by
simpa using prod_nhdsSet_le_of_disjoint_cocompact isCompact_singleton hf
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets and `n` is an open neighborhood of `s × t`, then there exist
open neighborhoods `u ⊇ s` and `v ⊇ t` such that `u × v ⊆ n`.
See also `IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq`. -/
theorem generalized_tube_lemma (hs : IsCompact s) {t : Set Y} (ht : IsCompact t)
{n : Set (X × Y)} (hn : IsOpen n) (hp : s ×ˢ t ⊆ n) :
∃ (u : Set X) (v : Set Y), IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ n := by
rw [← hn.mem_nhdsSet, hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq ht,
((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).prod (hasBasis_nhdsSet _)).mem_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨huo, hsu⟩, hvo, htv⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨u, v, huo, hvo, hsu, htv, hn⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.compactSpace [Subsingleton X] : CompactSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isCompact⟩
theorem isCompact_univ_iff : IsCompact (univ : Set X) ↔ CompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
theorem isCompact_univ [h : CompactSpace X] : IsCompact (univ : Set X) :=
h.isCompact_univ
theorem exists_clusterPt_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f] :
∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by
simpa using isCompact_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp)
nonrec theorem Ultrafilter.le_nhds_lim [CompactSpace X] (F : Ultrafilter X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 F.lim := by
rcases isCompact_univ.ultrafilter_le_nhds F (by simp) with ⟨x, -, h⟩
exact le_nhds_lim ⟨x, h⟩
theorem CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover [CompactSpace X] (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨t, -, s⟩ := IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover isCompact_univ U fun x _ => hU x
exact ⟨t, top_unique s⟩
theorem compactSpace_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → ⋂ i, t i = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, ⋂ i ∈ u, t i = ∅) :
CompactSpace X where
isCompact_univ := isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed fun t => by simpa using h t
theorem IsClosed.isCompact [CompactSpace X] (h : IsClosed s) : IsCompact s :=
isCompact_univ.of_isClosed_subset h (subset_univ _)
/-- If a filter has a unique cluster point `y` in a compact topological space,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt [CompactSpace X] {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(h : ∀ x, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y :=
isCompact_univ.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt univ_mem fun x _ ↦ h x
/-- If `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l`
and the codomain of `f` is a compact space,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt [CompactSpace X] {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(h : ∀ x, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt h
lemma noncompact_univ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [NoncompactSpace X] :
¬IsCompact (univ : Set X) :=
NoncompactSpace.noncompact_univ
theorem IsCompact.ne_univ [NoncompactSpace X] (hs : IsCompact s) : s ≠ univ := fun h =>
noncompact_univ X (h ▸ hs)
instance [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X) := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.neBot_iff.2 fun hs => ?_
contrapose hs; rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, compl_empty_iff] at hs
rw [hs]; exact noncompact_univ X
@[simp]
theorem Filter.cocompact_eq_bot [CompactSpace X] : Filter.cocompact X = ⊥ :=
Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.eq_bot_iff.mpr ⟨Set.univ, isCompact_univ, Set.compl_univ⟩
instance [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coclosedCompact X) :=
neBot_of_le Filter.cocompact_le_coclosedCompact
theorem noncompactSpace_of_neBot (_ : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X)) : NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h' => (Filter.nonempty_of_mem h'.compl_mem_cocompact).ne_empty compl_univ⟩
theorem Filter.cocompact_neBot_iff : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X) ↔ NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨noncompactSpace_of_neBot, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
theorem not_compactSpace_iff : ¬CompactSpace X ↔ NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h₁ => ⟨fun h₂ => h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩, fun ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ => h₁ h₂⟩
instance : NoncompactSpace ℤ :=
noncompactSpace_of_neBot <| by simp only [Filter.cocompact_eq_cofinite, Filter.cofinite_neBot]
-- Note: We can't make this into an instance because it loops with `Finite.compactSpace`.
/-- A compact discrete space is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_compact_of_discrete [CompactSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : Finite X :=
Finite.of_finite_univ <| isCompact_univ.finite_of_discrete
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact
{K : Set X} (hs : s.Infinite) (hK : IsCompact K) (hsub : s ⊆ K) :
∃ x ∈ K, AccPt x (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
(@hK _ hs.cofinite_inf_principal_neBot (inf_le_right.trans <| principal_mono.2 hsub)).imp
fun x hx ↦ by rwa [accPt_iff_clusterPt, inf_comm, inf_right_comm,
(finite_singleton _).cofinite_inf_principal_compl]
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_of_subset_isCompact {K : Set X} (hs : s.Infinite)
(hK : IsCompact K) (hsub : s ⊆ K) : ∃ x ∈ K, AccPt x (𝓟 s) :=
let ⟨x, hxK, hx⟩ := hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact hK hsub
⟨x, hxK, hx.mono inf_le_right⟩
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal [CompactSpace X] (hs : s.Infinite) :
∃ x, AccPt x (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
simpa only [mem_univ, true_and]
using hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact isCompact_univ s.subset_univ
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_principal [CompactSpace X] (hs : s.Infinite) : ∃ x, AccPt x (𝓟 s) :=
hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal.imp fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono inf_le_right
theorem exists_nhds_ne_neBot (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [CompactSpace X] [Infinite X] :
∃ z : X, (𝓝[≠] z).NeBot := by
simpa [AccPt] using (@infinite_univ X _).exists_accPt_principal
theorem finite_cover_nhds_interior [CompactSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, interior (U x) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := isCompact_univ.elim_finite_subcover (fun x => interior (U x))
(fun _ => isOpen_interior) fun x _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩
⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 ht⟩
theorem finite_cover_nhds [CompactSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := finite_cover_nhds_interior hU
⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 <| ht.symm.subset.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => interior_subset⟩
/-- The comap of the cocompact filter on `Y` by a continuous function `f : X → Y` is less than or
equal to the cocompact filter on `X`.
This is a reformulation of the fact that images of compact sets are compact. -/
theorem Filter.comap_cocompact_le {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
(Filter.cocompact Y).comap f ≤ Filter.cocompact X := by
rw [(Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.comap f).le_basis_iff Filter.hasBasis_cocompact]
intro t ht
refine ⟨f '' t, ht.image hf, ?_⟩
simpa using t.subset_preimage_image f
/-- If a filter is disjoint from the cocompact filter, so is its image under any continuous
function. -/
theorem disjoint_map_cocompact {g : X → Y} {f : Filter X} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X)) : Disjoint (map g f) (Filter.cocompact Y) := by
rw [← Filter.disjoint_comap_iff_map, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
calc
f ⊓ (comap g (cocompact Y))
_ ≤ f ⊓ Filter.cocompact X := inf_le_inf_left f (Filter.comap_cocompact_le hg)
_ = ⊥ := disjoint_iff.mp hf
theorem isCompact_range [CompactSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact isCompact_univ.image hf
theorem isCompact_diagonal [CompactSpace X] : IsCompact (diagonal X) :=
@range_diag X ▸ isCompact_range (continuous_id.prodMk continuous_id)
/-- If `X` is a compact topological space, then `Prod.snd : X × Y → Y` is a closed map. -/
theorem isClosedMap_snd_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] :
IsClosedMap (Prod.snd : X × Y → Y) := fun s hs => by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
intro y hy
have : univ ×ˢ {y} ⊆ sᶜ := by
exact fun (x, y') ⟨_, rfl⟩ hs => hy ⟨(x, y'), hs, rfl⟩
rcases generalized_tube_lemma isCompact_univ isCompact_singleton hs.isOpen_compl this
with ⟨U, V, -, hVo, hU, hV, hs⟩
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨V, ?_, hVo, hV rfl⟩
rintro _ hzV ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩
exact hs ⟨hU trivial, hzV⟩ hzs
/-- If `Y` is a compact topological space, then `Prod.fst : X × Y → X` is a closed map. -/
theorem isClosedMap_fst_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace Y] : IsClosedMap (Prod.fst : X × Y → X) :=
isClosedMap_snd_of_compactSpace.comp isClosedMap_swap
theorem exists_subset_nhds_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] [Nonempty ι]
{V : ι → Set X} (hV : Directed (· ⊇ ·) V) (hV_closed : ∀ i, IsClosed (V i)) {U : Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U :=
exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact' hV (fun i => (hV_closed i).isCompact) hV_closed hU
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is compact
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isCompact_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun hs => hs.image hf.continuous, fun hs F F_ne_bot F_le => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, x_in : x ∈ s, rfl⟩, hx : ClusterPt (f x) (map f F)⟩ :=
hs ((map_mono F_le).trans_eq map_principal)
exact ⟨x, x_in, hf.mapClusterPt_iff.1 hx⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.isCompact_iff := IsInducing.isCompact_iff
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an embedding, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is compact
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Topology.IsEmbedding.isCompact_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsEmbedding f) :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (f '' s) := hf.isInducing.isCompact_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.isCompact_iff := IsEmbedding.isCompact_iff
/-- The preimage of a compact set under an inducing map is a compact set. -/
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isCompact_preimage (hf : IsInducing f) (hf' : IsClosed (range f))
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) := by
replace hK := hK.inter_right hf'
rwa [hf.isCompact_iff, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isCompact_preimage := IsInducing.isCompact_preimage
lemma Topology.IsInducing.isCompact_preimage_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) {K : Set Y}
(Kf : K ⊆ range f) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) ↔ IsCompact K := by
rw [hf.isCompact_iff, image_preimage_eq_of_subset Kf]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isCompact_preimage_iff := IsInducing.isCompact_preimage_iff
/-- The preimage of a compact set in the image of an inducing map is compact. -/
lemma Topology.IsInducing.isCompact_preimage' (hf : IsInducing f) {K : Set Y}
(hK : IsCompact K) (Kf : K ⊆ range f) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) :=
(hf.isCompact_preimage_iff Kf).2 hK
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isCompact_preimage' := IsInducing.isCompact_preimage'
/-- The preimage of a compact set under a closed embedding is a compact set. -/
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f)
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) :=
hf.isInducing.isCompact_preimage (hf.isClosed_range) hK
/-- A closed embedding is proper, ie, inverse images of compact sets are contained in compacts.
Moreover, the preimage of a compact set is compact, see `IsClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage`. -/
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.tendsto_cocompact (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) :
Tendsto f (Filter.cocompact X) (Filter.cocompact Y) :=
Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun _K hK =>
(hf.isCompact_preimage hK).compl_mem_cocompact
/-- Sets of subtype are compact iff the image under a coercion is. -/
theorem Subtype.isCompact_iff {p : X → Prop} {s : Set { x // p x }} :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) '' s : Set X) :=
IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.isCompact_iff
theorem isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ : IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (univ : Set s) := by
rw [Subtype.isCompact_iff, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem isCompact_iff_compactSpace : IsCompact s ↔ CompactSpace s :=
isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ.trans isCompact_univ_iff
theorem IsCompact.finite (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : DiscreteTopology s) : s.Finite :=
finite_coe_iff.mp (@finite_of_compact_of_discrete _ _ (isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs) hs')
theorem exists_nhds_ne_inf_principal_neBot (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : s.Infinite) :
∃ z ∈ s, (𝓝[≠] z ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot :=
hs'.exists_accPt_of_subset_isCompact hs Subset.rfl
protected theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.noncompactSpace [NoncompactSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) : NoncompactSpace Y :=
noncompactSpace_of_neBot hf.tendsto_cocompact.neBot
| protected theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.compactSpace [h : CompactSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) : CompactSpace X :=
⟨by rw [hf.isInducing.isCompact_iff, image_univ]; exact hf.isClosed_range.isCompact⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 909 | 911 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
|
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 153 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bhavik Mehta, Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Limits
import Mathlib.Topology.StoneCech
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHausLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
/-!
# The category of Compact Hausdorff Spaces
We construct the category of compact Hausdorff spaces.
The type of compact Hausdorff spaces is denoted `CompHaus`, and it is endowed with a category
instance making it a full subcategory of `TopCat`.
The fully faithful functor `CompHaus ⥤ TopCat` is denoted `compHausToTop`.
**Note:** The file `Mathlib/Topology/Category/Compactum.lean` provides the equivalence between
`Compactum`, which is defined as the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, and `CompHaus`.
`CompactumToCompHaus` is the functor from `Compactum` to `CompHaus` which is proven to be an
equivalence of categories in `CompactumToCompHaus.isEquivalence`.
See `Mathlib/Topology/Category/Compactum.lean` for a more detailed discussion where these
definitions are introduced.
## Implementation
The category `CompHaus` is defined using the structure `CompHausLike`. See the file
`CompHausLike.Basic` for more information.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CompHausLike
/-- The category of compact Hausdorff spaces. -/
abbrev CompHaus := CompHausLike (fun _ ↦ True)
namespace CompHaus
instance : Inhabited CompHaus :=
⟨{ toTop := TopCat.of PEmpty, prop := trivial}⟩
instance : CoeSort CompHaus Type* :=
⟨fun X => X.toTop⟩
instance {X : CompHaus} : CompactSpace X :=
X.is_compact
instance {X : CompHaus} : T2Space X :=
X.is_hausdorff
variable (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [CompactSpace X] [T2Space X]
instance : HasProp (fun _ ↦ True) X := ⟨trivial⟩
/-- A constructor for objects of the category `CompHaus`,
taking a type, and bundling the compact Hausdorff topology
found by typeclass inference. -/
abbrev of : CompHaus := CompHausLike.of _ X
end CompHaus
/-- The fully faithful embedding of `CompHaus` in `TopCat`. -/
abbrev compHausToTop : CompHaus.{u} ⥤ TopCat.{u} :=
CompHausLike.compHausLikeToTop _
/-- (Implementation) The object part of the compactification functor from topological spaces to
compact Hausdorff spaces.
-/
@[simps!]
def stoneCechObj (X : TopCat) : CompHaus :=
CompHaus.of (StoneCech X)
/-- (Implementation) The bijection of homsets to establish the reflective adjunction of compact
Hausdorff spaces in topological spaces.
-/
noncomputable def stoneCechEquivalence (X : TopCat.{u}) (Y : CompHaus.{u}) :
(stoneCechObj X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X ⟶ compHausToTop.obj Y) where
toFun f := TopCat.ofHom
{ toFun := f ∘ stoneCechUnit
continuous_toFun := f.hom.2.comp (@continuous_stoneCechUnit X _) }
invFun f := CompHausLike.ofHom _
{ toFun := stoneCechExtend f.hom.2
continuous_toFun := continuous_stoneCechExtend f.hom.2 }
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f : StoneCech X ⟶ Y, hf : Continuous f⟩
ext x
refine congr_fun ?_ x
apply Continuous.ext_on denseRange_stoneCechUnit (continuous_stoneCechExtend _) hf
· rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply congr_fun (stoneCechExtend_extends (hf.comp _)) y
apply continuous_stoneCechUnit
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f : (X : Type _) ⟶ Y, hf : Continuous f⟩
ext
exact congr_fun (stoneCechExtend_extends hf) _
/-- The Stone-Cech compactification functor from topological spaces to compact Hausdorff spaces,
left adjoint to the inclusion functor.
-/
noncomputable def topToCompHaus : TopCat.{u} ⥤ CompHaus.{u} :=
Adjunction.leftAdjointOfEquiv stoneCechEquivalence.{u} fun _ _ _ _ _ => rfl
theorem topToCompHaus_obj (X : TopCat) : ↥(topToCompHaus.obj X) = StoneCech X :=
rfl
/-- The category of compact Hausdorff spaces is reflective in the category of topological spaces.
-/
noncomputable instance compHausToTop.reflective : Reflective compHausToTop where
L := topToCompHaus
adj := Adjunction.adjunctionOfEquivLeft _ _
noncomputable instance compHausToTop.createsLimits : CreatesLimits compHausToTop :=
monadicCreatesLimits _
instance CompHaus.hasLimits : Limits.HasLimits CompHaus :=
hasLimits_of_hasLimits_createsLimits compHausToTop
instance CompHaus.hasColimits : Limits.HasColimits CompHaus :=
hasColimits_of_reflective compHausToTop
namespace CompHaus
/-- An explicit limit cone for a functor `F : J ⥤ CompHaus`, defined in terms of
`TopCat.limitCone`. -/
def limitCone {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] (F : J ⥤ CompHaus.{max v u}) : Limits.Cone F :=
letI FF : J ⥤ TopCat := F ⋙ compHausToTop
{ pt := {
toTop := (TopCat.limitCone FF).pt
is_compact := by
show CompactSpace { u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), (F.map f) (u i) = u j }
rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
apply IsClosed.isCompact
have :
{ u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), F.map f (u i) = u j } =
⋂ (i : J) (j : J) (f : i ⟶ j), { u | F.map f (u i) = u j } := by
ext1
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [this]
apply isClosed_iInter
intro i
apply isClosed_iInter
intro j
apply isClosed_iInter
intro f
apply isClosed_eq
· exact ((F.map f).hom.continuous).comp (continuous_apply i)
· exact continuous_apply j
is_hausdorff :=
show T2Space { u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), (F.map f) (u i) = u j } from
inferInstance
prop := trivial }
π := {
app := fun j => (TopCat.limitCone FF).π.app j
naturality := by
intro _ _ f
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [CategoryTheory.comp_apply, Functor.const_obj_map, CategoryTheory.id_apply]
exact (hx f).symm } }
/-- The limit cone `CompHaus.limitCone F` is indeed a limit cone. -/
def limitConeIsLimit {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] (F : J ⥤ CompHaus.{max v u}) :
Limits.IsLimit.{v} (limitCone.{v,u} F) :=
letI FF : J ⥤ TopCat := F ⋙ compHausToTop
{ lift := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).lift (compHausToTop.mapCone S)
fac := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).fac (compHausToTop.mapCone S)
uniq := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).uniq (compHausToTop.mapCone S) }
theorem epi_iff_surjective {X Y : CompHaus.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
constructor
· dsimp [Function.Surjective]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hf
let C := Set.range f
have hC : IsClosed C := (isCompact_range f.hom.continuous).isClosed
let D := ({y} : Set Y)
have hD : IsClosed D := isClosed_singleton
have hCD : Disjoint C D := by
rw [Set.disjoint_singleton_right]
rintro ⟨y', hy'⟩
exact hy y' hy'
obtain ⟨φ, hφ0, hφ1, hφ01⟩ := exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed hC hD hCD
haveI : CompactSpace (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) := Homeomorph.ulift.symm.compactSpace
haveI : T2Space (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) := Homeomorph.ulift.symm.t2Space
let Z := of (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)
let g : Y ⟶ Z := ofHom _
⟨fun y' => ⟨⟨φ y', hφ01 y'⟩⟩,
continuous_uliftUp.comp (φ.continuous.subtype_mk fun y' => hφ01 y')⟩
let h : Y ⟶ Z := ofHom _
⟨fun _ => ⟨⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.mpr zero_le_one⟩⟩, continuous_const⟩
have H : h = g := by
rw [← cancel_epi f]
ext x : 4
simp [g, h, Z, hφ0 (Set.mem_range_self x)]
apply_fun fun e => (e y).down.1 at H
dsimp [g, h, Z] at H
simp only [hφ1 (Set.mem_singleton y), Pi.one_apply] at H
exact zero_ne_one H
· rw [← CategoryTheory.epi_iff_surjective]
apply (forget CompHaus).epi_of_epi_map
end CompHaus
/-- Every `CompHausLike` admits a functor to `CompHaus`. -/
abbrev compHausLikeToCompHaus (P : TopCat → Prop) : CompHausLike P ⥤ CompHaus :=
CompHausLike.toCompHausLike (by simp only [implies_true])
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/CompHaus/Basic.lean | 380 | 392 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.