Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
/-!
# The Ahlswede-Zhang identity
This file proves the Ahlswede-Zhang identity, which is a nontrivial relation between the size of the
"truncated unions" of a set family. It sharpens the Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality
`Finset.lubell_yamamoto_meshalkin_inequality_sum_card_div_choose`, by making explicit the correction
term.
For a set family `𝒜` over a ground set of size `n`, the Ahlswede-Zhang identity states that the sum
of `|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|)` over all set `A` is exactly `1`. This implies the LYM
inequality since for an antichain `𝒜` and every `A ∈ 𝒜` we have
`|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|) = 1 / n.choose |A|`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.truncatedSup`: `s.truncatedSup a` is the supremum of all `b ≥ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊤` if there are none.
* `Finset.truncatedInf`: `s.truncatedInf a` is the infimum of all `b ≤ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊥` if there are none.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum`: LHS of the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.le_infSum`: The sum of `1 / n.choose |A|` over an antichain is less than the RHS of
the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum_eq_one`: Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
## References
* [R. Ahlswede, Z. Zhang, *An identity in combinatorial extremal theory*](https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(90)90023-G)
* [D. T. Tru, *An AZ-style identity and Bollobás deficiency*](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2007.03.005)
-/
section
variable (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [Nonempty α] {m n : ℕ}
open Finset Fintype Nat
private lemma binomial_sum_eq (h : n < m) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) : ℚ) = 1 := by
set f : ℕ → ℚ := fun i ↦ n.choose i * (m.choose i : ℚ)⁻¹ with hf
suffices ∀ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i - f (i + 1) = n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) by
rw [← sum_congr rfl this, sum_range_sub', hf]
simp [choose_self, choose_zero_right, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
intro i h₁
rw [mem_range] at h₁
have h₁ := le_of_lt_succ h₁
have h₂ := h₁.trans_lt h
have h₃ := h₂.le
have hi₄ : (i + 1 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := i.cast_add_one_ne_zero
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq m i)
push_cast at this
dsimp [f, hf]
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq n i)
push_cast at this
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have : (m - i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero_of_ne (cast_lt.mpr h₂).ne'
have : (m.choose i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos h₂.le).ne'
field_simp
ring
|
private lemma Fintype.sum_div_mul_card_choose_card :
∑ s : Finset α, (card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (↑k)⁻¹ + 1 := by
rw [← powerset_univ, powerset_card_disjiUnion, sum_disjiUnion]
have : ∀ {x : ℕ}, ∀ s ∈ powersetCard x (univ : Finset α),
(card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α / ((card α - x) * (card α).choose x) := by
intros n s hs
rw [mem_powersetCard_univ.1 hs]
simp_rw [sum_congr rfl this, sum_const, card_powersetCard, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div,
mul_comm, ← mul_div]
rw [← mul_sum, ← mul_inv_cancel₀ (cast_ne_zero.mpr card_ne_zero : (card α : ℚ) ≠ 0), ← mul_add,
add_comm _ ((card α)⁻¹ : ℚ), ← sum_insert (f := fun x : ℕ ↦ (x⁻¹ : ℚ)) not_mem_range_self,
← range_succ]
have (n) (hn : n ∈ range (card α + 1)) :
((card α).choose n / ((card α - n) * (card α).choose n) : ℚ) = (card α - n : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
rw [div_mul_cancel_right₀]
exact cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos <| mem_range_succ_iff.1 hn).ne'
simp only [sum_congr rfl this, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, cast_eq_zero]
convert Or.inl <| sum_range_reflect _ _ with a ha
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/AhlswedeZhang.lean | 73 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (ofNat(n) : PartENat) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hy
· simp
induction x using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hx
· simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_lt {x y : PartENat} [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x < toWithTop y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toWithTop_le
end WithTop
/-- Coercion from `ℕ∞` to `PartENat`. -/
@[coe]
def ofENat : ℕ∞ → PartENat :=
fun x => match x with
| Option.none => none
| Option.some n => some n
instance : Coe ℕ∞ PartENat := ⟨ofENat⟩
example (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℕ∞) : PartENat) = ↑n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_coe (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofENat ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toWithTop_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop (↑n) = n := by
cases n with
| top => simp
| coe n => simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_toWithTop (x : PartENat) {_ : Decidable (x : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop x = x := by
induction x using PartENat.casesOn <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_le {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x ≤ ofENat y ↔ x ≤ y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_le, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x < ofENat y ↔ x < y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_lt, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
section WithTopEquiv
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_add {x y : PartENat} : toWithTop (x + y) = toWithTop x + toWithTop y := by
refine PartENat.casesOn y ?_ ?_ <;> refine PartENat.casesOn x ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [add_top, top_add, ← Nat.cast_add, ← ENat.coe_add]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `Equiv` between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`withTopOrderIso`). -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def withTopEquiv : PartENat ≃ ℕ∞ where
toFun x := toWithTop x
invFun x := ↑x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
theorem withTopEquiv_top : withTopEquiv ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_natCast (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_zero : withTopEquiv 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_one : withTopEquiv 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_le {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x ≤ withTopEquiv y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_lt {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x < withTopEquiv y ↔ x < y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_top : withTopEquiv.symm ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_coe (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv.symm n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_zero : withTopEquiv.symm 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_one : withTopEquiv.symm 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv.symm ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_le {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x ≤ withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x < withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x < y := by
simp
/-- `toWithTop` induces an order isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => withTopEquiv_le }
/-- `toWithTop` induces an additive monoid isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [withTopEquiv]
exact toWithTop_add }
end WithTopEquiv
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded PartENat (· < ·) := by
classical
change WellFounded fun a b : PartENat => a < b
simp_rw [← withTopEquiv_lt]
exact InvImage.wf _ wellFounded_lt
instance : WellFoundedLT PartENat :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation PartENat :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
section Find
variable (P : ℕ → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
/-- The smallest `PartENat` satisfying a (decidable) predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` -/
def find : PartENat :=
⟨∃ n, P n, Nat.find⟩
@[simp]
theorem find_get (h : (find P).Dom) : (find P).get h = Nat.find h :=
rfl
theorem find_dom (h : ∃ n, P n) : (find P).Dom :=
h
theorem lt_find (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m) : (n : PartENat) < find P := by
rw [coe_lt_iff]
intro h₁
rw [find_get]
have h₂ := @Nat.find_spec P _ h₁
revert h₂
contrapose!
exact h _
theorem lt_find_iff (n : ℕ) : (n : PartENat) < find P ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m := by
refine ⟨?_, lt_find P n⟩
intro h m hm
by_cases H : (find P).Dom
· apply Nat.find_min H
rw [coe_lt_iff] at h
specialize h H
exact lt_of_le_of_lt hm h
· exact not_exists.mp H m
theorem find_le (n : ℕ) (h : P n) : find P ≤ n := by
rw [le_coe_iff]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, @Nat.find_min' P _ _ _ h⟩
theorem find_eq_top_iff : find P = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ¬P n :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt _).trans
⟨fun h n => (lt_find_iff P n).mp (h n) _ le_rfl, fun h n => lt_find P n fun _ _ => h _⟩
end Find
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop PartENat :=
{ PartENat.linearOrder, PartENat.isOrderedAddMonoid, PartENat.orderTop with
top_add' := top_add }
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder PartENat :=
{ lattice, withTopOrderIso.symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice,
linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end PartENat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 791 | 793 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup (e ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply, e.image_eq_preimage,
Set.preimage_setOf_eq, e.le_symm_apply]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
e.dual.apply_blimsup
theorem _root_.sSupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
theorem _root_.sInfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
(sInfHom.dual g).apply_blimsup_le
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
section SetLattice
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {𝓕 : Filter ι} {a : α}
lemma mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem : (a ∈ liminf s 𝓕) ↔ (∀ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simpa only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter]
using ⟨fun ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩ ↦ mem_of_superset hS (by tauto), fun h ↦ ⟨{i | a ∈ s i}, h, by tauto⟩⟩
lemma mem_limsup_iff_frequently_mem : (a ∈ limsup s 𝓕) ↔ (∃ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, iff_not_comm, ← mem_compl_iff, limsup_compl, comp_apply,
mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem]
theorem cofinite.blimsup_set_eq :
blimsup s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, le_eq_subset, eventually_cofinite, not_forall, sInf_eq_sInter, exists_prop]
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hx t h => ?_⟩ <;> contrapose! h
· simp only [mem_sInter, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
exact ⟨{x}ᶜ, by simpa using h, by simp⟩
· exact hx.mono fun i hi => ⟨hi.1, fun hit => h (hit hi.2)⟩
theorem cofinite.bliminf_set_eq : bliminf s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, ← blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup,
cofinite.blimsup_set_eq]
rfl
/-- In other words, `limsup cofinite s` is the set of elements lying inside the family `s`
infinitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.limsup_set_eq : limsup s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.blimsup_true s, cofinite.blimsup_set_eq, true_and]
/-- In other words, `liminf cofinite s` is the set of elements lying outside the family `s`
finitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.liminf_set_eq : liminf s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.bliminf_true s, cofinite.bliminf_set_eq, true_and]
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β} {q : ι → Prop}
(hl : l.HasBasis q b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) :
∃ f : { i | q i } → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
rw [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup] at hx
simp only [iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
choose g hg hg' using hx
refine ⟨fun i : { i | q i } => g (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2), fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact hg' (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
· exact hg (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β}
(hl : l.HasBasis (fun _ => True) b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) : ∃ f : ι → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup hl hx
exact ⟨fun i => f ⟨i, trivial⟩, fun i => hf ⟨i, trivial⟩⟩
end SetLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : a < limsSup f) : ∃ᶠ n in f, a < n := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, not_lt] at h
exact limsSup_le_of_le hf h
theorem frequently_lt_of_limsInf_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : limsInf f < a) : ∃ᶠ n in f, n < a :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup (α := OrderDual α) hf h
theorem eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : b < liminf u f)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a := by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (_ : c ∈ { c : β | ∀ᶠ n : α in f, c ≤ u n }), b < c := by
simp_rw [exists_prop]
exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup hu h
exact hc.mono fun x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx
theorem eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : limsup u f < b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (β := βᵒᵈ) h hu
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, eventually we have `u b < x + ε`. -/
theorem eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x)
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, u b < x + ε :=
eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hu (lt_add_of_pos_right x hε)) hu_bdd
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, eventually we have `x + ε < u b`. -/
theorem eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop)
(hε : ε < 0) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, x + ε < u b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_of_neg_right x hε) hu) hu_bdd
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that `u n < x + ε`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_limsup_le [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ n : PNat, u n < x + ε := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, u n < x + ε := eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that ` x + ε < u n`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_le_liminf [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop) (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ n : PNat, x + ε < u n := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + ε < u n := eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β}
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, b ≤ u x)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
b ≤ limsup u f := by
revert hu_le
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently]
simp_rw [← lt_iff_not_ge]
exact fun h => eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt h hu
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ b :=
le_limsup_of_frequently_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu_le hu
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : b < limsup u f) : ∃ᶠ x in f, b < u x := by
contrapose! h
apply limsSup_le_of_le hu
simpa using h
theorem frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : liminf u f < b) : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x < b :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) hu h
theorem limsup_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ a in f, u a < y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from above, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le'` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must eventually be smaller or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y > x, ∃ z, x < z ∧ z < y
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro y x_y
rcases h' y x_y with ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ ((h z x_z).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt))).trans_lt z_y
· apply limsup_le_of_le h₁
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, x_z, hz⟩
exact (h z x_z).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_left (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `limsup_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma limsup_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, u a ≤ y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro h y x_y
obtain ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩ := exists_between x_y
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ (h z x_z)).trans_lt z_y
theorem le_limsup_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y < u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from below, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must frequently be larger or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y < x, ∃ z, y < z ∧ z < x
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := h' y y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le ((h z z_x).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt)) h₂)
· apply le_limsup_of_frequently_le _ h₂
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, z_x, hz⟩
exact (h z z_x).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_right (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `le_limsup_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma le_limsup_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h)).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro h y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := exists_between y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le (h z z_x) h₂)
theorem le_liminf_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y < u a := limsup_le_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `le_liminf_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem le_liminf_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := limsup_le_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a < y := le_limsup_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `liminf_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem liminf_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ y := le_limsup_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
lemma liminf_le_limsup_of_frequently_le {v : α → β} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ v x)
(h₁ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup v f := by
rcases f.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· exact (frequently_bot h).rec
have h₃ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₂.eventually_le
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_le (a := a)
exact (h.and_eventually ha).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
have h₄ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁.eventually_ge
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_ge (a := a)
exact (ha.and_frequently h).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
refine (le_limsup_iff h₄ h₂).2 fun y y_v ↦ ?_
have := (le_liminf_iff h₃ h₁).1 (le_refl (liminf u f)) y y_v
exact (h.and_eventually this).mono fun x ⟨ux_vx, y_ux⟩ ↦ y_ux.trans_le ux_vx
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : Filter α} {b : α}
-- The linter erroneously claims that I'm not referring to `c`
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) (l : f.limsSup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h l
mem_of_superset h fun _a => hcb.trans_le'
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_limsInf_gt : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) → b < f.limsInf → ∀ᶠ a in f, b < a :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` over `j : Subtype p` and a function `f`, then
`liminf_reparam j` is equal to `j` if `f` is bounded below on `s j`, and otherwise to some
index `k` such that `f` is bounded below on `s k` (if there exists one).
To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is chosen as the minimal suitable index.
This function is used to write down a liminf in a measurable way,
in `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf` and `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def liminf_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
let g : ℕ → Subtype p := (exists_surjective_nat _).choose
have Z : ∃ n, g n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
by_cases H : ∃ j, j ∈ m
· rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj⟩
· push_neg at H
exact ⟨0, Or.inr H⟩
if j ∈ m then j else g (Nat.find Z)
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
liminf f v = ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
classical
rcases H with ⟨j0, hj0⟩
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
have : ∀ (j : Subtype p), Nonempty (s j) := fun j ↦ Nonempty.coe_sort (hs j)
have A : ⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) =
⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
by_cases hj : j ∈ m
· have : j = liminf_reparam f s p j := by simp only [m, liminf_reparam, hj, ite_true]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
apply subset_iUnion _ j
· simp only [m, mem_setOf_eq, ← nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hj
simp only [hj, empty_subset]
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
exact subset_iUnion (fun (k : Subtype p) ↦ (⋂ (i : s k), Iic (f i))) (liminf_reparam f s p j)
have B : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) =
Iic (⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i) := by
intro j
apply (Iic_ciInf _).symm
change liminf_reparam f s p j ∈ m
by_cases Hj : j ∈ m
· simpa only [m, liminf_reparam, if_pos Hj] using Hj
· simp only [m, liminf_reparam, if_neg Hj]
have Z : ∃ n, (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j0 with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj0⟩
rcases Nat.find_spec Z with hZ|hZ
· exact hZ
· exact (hZ j0 hj0).elim
simp_rw [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, B, sSup_iUnion_Iic]
open Classical in
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
liminf f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sSup univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sSup ∅
else ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
by_cases H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅
· rw [if_pos H]
rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
simp [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty j j.2 hj]
rw [if_neg H]
by_cases H' : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))
· have A : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff]
exact H'
simp_rw [if_pos H', hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, iUnion_empty]
rw [if_neg H']
apply hv.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf
· push_neg at H
simpa only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] using H
· push_neg at H'
exact H'
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` and a function `f`, then `limsup_reparam j` is equal
to `j` if `f` is bounded above on `s j`, and otherwise to some index `k` such that `f` is bounded
above on `s k` (if there exists one). To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is
chosen as the minimal suitable index. This function is used to write down a limsup in a measurable
way, in `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup` and `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def limsup_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
liminf_reparam (α := αᵒᵈ) f s p j
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded above. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
limsup f v = ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf (α := αᵒᵈ) hv hs H
open Classical in
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
limsup f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sInf univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sInf ∅
else ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite (α := αᵒᵈ) hv f
end Classical
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
end Filter
section Order
theorem GaloisConnection.l_limsup_le [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {f : Filter α} {v : α → β} {l : β → γ} {u : γ → β}
(gc : GaloisConnection l u)
(hlv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => l (v x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
l (limsup v f) ≤ limsup (fun x => l (v x)) f := by
refine le_limsSup_of_le hlv fun c hc => ?_
rw [Filter.eventually_map] at hc
simp_rw [gc _ _] at hc ⊢
exact limsSup_le_of_le hv_co hc
theorem OrderIso.limsup_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (limsup u f) = limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f := by
refine le_antisymm ((OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g).l_limsup_le hgu hu_co) ?_
rw [← g.symm.symm_apply_apply <| limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f, g.symm_symm]
refine g.monotone ?_
have hf : u = fun i => g.symm (g (u i)) := funext fun i => (g.symm_apply_apply (u i)).symm
nth_rw 2 [hf]
refine (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g.symm).l_limsup_le ?_ hgu_co
simp_rw [g.symm_apply_apply]
exact hu
theorem OrderIso.liminf_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (liminf u f) = liminf (fun x => g (u x)) f :=
OrderIso.limsup_apply (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) g.dual hu hu_co hgu hgu_co
end Order
section MinMax
open Filter
theorem limsup_max [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f = max (limsup u f) (limsup v f) := by
have bddmax := IsBoundedUnder.sup h₃ h₄
have cobddmax := isCoboundedUnder_le_max (v := v) (Or.inl h₁)
apply le_antisymm
· refine (limsup_le_iff cobddmax bddmax).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
have hu := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hb) h₃
have hv := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hb) h₄
refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hu hv) (fun _ ↦ by simp)
· exact max_le (c := limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_left (u a) (v a))) h₁ bddmax)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_right (u a) (v a))) h₂ bddmax)
theorem liminf_min [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ min (u a) (v a)) f = min (liminf u f) (liminf v f) :=
limsup_max (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
open Finset
theorem limsup_finset_sup' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup' s hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
have bddsup := isBoundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₂
apply le_antisymm
· have h₃ : ∃ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by
rcases hs with ⟨i, i_s⟩
use i, i_s
exact h₁ i i_s
have cobddsup := isCoboundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₃
refine (limsup_le_iff cobddsup bddsup).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem]
use ⋂ i ∈ s, {a | F i a < b}
split_ands
· rw [biInter_finset_mem]
suffices key : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ᶠ a in f, F i a < b from fun i i_s ↦ eventually_iff.1 (key i i_s)
intro i i_s
apply eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt _ (h₂ i i_s)
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (Finset.le_sup' (f := fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) i_s) hb
· simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, Finset.sup'_apply, sup'_lt_iff, imp_self, implies_true]
· apply Finset.sup'_le hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f)
refine fun i i_s ↦ limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a ↦ ?_)) (h₁ i i_s) bddsup
simp only [Finset.sup'_apply, le_sup'_iff]
use i, i_s
theorem limsup_finset_sup [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderBot β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup s (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
rcases eq_or_neBot f with (rfl | _)
· simp [limsup_eq, csInf_univ]
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | s_nemp)
· simp only [Finset.sup_apply, sup_empty, limsup_const]
rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f, ← limsup_finset_sup' s_nemp h₁ h₂]
congr
ext a
exact Eq.symm (Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp (fun i ↦ F i a))
theorem liminf_finset_inf' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf' s hs (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup' (β := βᵒᵈ) hs h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_finset_inf [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderTop β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf s (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end MinMax
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,274 | 1,281 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Levenshtein distances
We define the Levenshtein edit distance `levenshtein C xy ys` between two `List α`,
with a customizable cost structure `C` for the `delete`, `insert`, and `substitute` operations.
As an auxiliary function, we define `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`, which gives the list of distances
from each suffix of `xs` to `ys`.
This is defined by recursion on `ys`, using the internal function `Levenshtein.impl`,
which computes `suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys)` using `xs`, `y`, and `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`.
(This corresponds to the usual algorithm
using the last two rows of the matrix of distances between suffixes.)
After setting up these definitions, we prove lemmas specifying their behaviour,
particularly
```
theorem suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1 = xs.tails.map fun xs' => levenshtein C xs' ys := ...
```
and
```
theorem levenshtein_cons_cons :
levenshtein C (x :: xs) (y :: ys) =
min (C.delete x + levenshtein C xs (y :: ys))
(min (C.insert y + levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys)
(C.substitute x y + levenshtein C xs ys)) := ...
```
-/
variable {α β δ : Type*} [AddZeroClass δ] [Min δ]
namespace Levenshtein
/-- A cost structure for Levenshtein edit distance. -/
structure Cost (α β δ : Type*) where
/-- Cost to delete an element from a list. -/
delete : α → δ
/-- Cost in insert an element into a list. -/
insert : β → δ
/-- Cost to substitute one element for another in a list. -/
substitute : α → β → δ
/-- The default cost structure, for which all operations cost `1`. -/
@[simps]
def defaultCost [DecidableEq α] : Cost α α ℕ where
delete _ := 1
insert _ := 1
substitute a b := if a = b then 0 else 1
instance [DecidableEq α] : Inhabited (Cost α α ℕ) := ⟨defaultCost⟩
/--
Cost structure given by a function.
Delete and insert cost the same, and substitution costs the greater value.
-/
@[simps]
def weightCost (f : α → ℕ) : Cost α α ℕ where
delete a := f a
insert b := f b
substitute a b := max (f a) (f b)
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost String.length
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the log base 2 length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLogLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost fun s => Nat.log2 (s.length + 1)
variable (C : Cost α β δ)
/--
(Implementation detail for `levenshtein`)
Given a list `xs` and the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to some other list `ys`,
compute the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to `y :: ys`.
(Note that we don't actually need to know `ys` itself here, so it is not an argument.)
The return value is a list of length `x.length + 1`,
and it is convenient for the recursive calls that we bundle this list
with a proof that it is non-empty.
-/
def impl
(xs : List α) (y : β) (d : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length}) : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length} :=
let ⟨ds, w⟩ := d
xs.zip (ds.zip ds.tail) |>.foldr
(init := ⟨[C.insert y + ds.getLast (List.length_pos_iff.mp w)], by simp⟩)
(fun ⟨x, d₀, d₁⟩ ⟨r, w⟩ =>
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d₀) (C.substitute x y + d₁)) :: r, by simp⟩)
variable {C}
variable (x : α) (xs : List α) (y : β) (d : δ) (ds : List δ) (w : 0 < (d :: ds).length)
-- Note this lemma has an unspecified proof `w'` on the right-hand-side,
-- which will become an extra goal when rewriting.
theorem impl_cons (w' : 0 < List.length ds) :
impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩ =
let ⟨r, w⟩ := impl C xs y ⟨ds, w'⟩
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d) (C.substitute x y + ds[0])) :: r, by simp⟩ :=
match ds, w' with | _ :: _, _ => rfl
-- Note this lemma has two unspecified proofs: `h` appears on the left-hand-side
-- and should be found by matching, but `w'` will become an extra goal when rewriting.
theorem impl_cons_fst_zero (h : 0 < (impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩).val.length)
(w' : 0 < List.length ds) : (impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩).1[0] =
let ⟨r, w⟩ := impl C xs y ⟨ds, w'⟩
min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d) (C.substitute x y + ds[0])) :=
match ds, w' with | _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem impl_length (d : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length}) (w : d.1.length = xs.length + 1) :
(impl C xs y d).1.length = xs.length + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing d with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih =>
dsimp [impl]
match d, w with
| ⟨d₁ :: d₂ :: ds, _⟩, w =>
dsimp
congr 1
exact ih ⟨d₂ :: ds, (by simp)⟩ (by simpa using w)
end Levenshtein
open Levenshtein
variable (C : Cost α β δ)
/--
`suffixLevenshtein C xs ys` computes the Levenshtein distance
(using the cost functions provided by a `C : Cost α β δ`)
from each suffix of the list `xs` to the list `ys`.
The first element of this list is the Levenshtein distance from `xs` to `ys`.
Note that if the cost functions do not satisfy the inequalities
* `C.delete a + C.insert b ≥ C.substitute a b`
* `C.substitute a b + C.substitute b c ≥ C.substitute a c`
(or if any values are negative)
then the edit distances calculated here may not agree with the general
geodesic distance on the edit graph.
-/
def suffixLevenshtein (xs : List α) (ys : List β) : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length} :=
ys.foldr
(impl C xs)
(xs.foldr (init := ⟨[0], by simp⟩) (fun a ⟨r, w⟩ => ⟨(C.delete a + r[0]) :: r, by simp⟩))
variable {C}
theorem suffixLevenshtein_length (xs : List α) (ys : List β) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.length = xs.length + 1 := by
induction ys with
| nil =>
dsimp [suffixLevenshtein]
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ xs ih =>
simp_all
| cons y ys ih =>
dsimp [suffixLevenshtein]
rw [impl_length]
exact ih
-- This is only used in keeping track of estimates.
theorem suffixLevenshtein_eq (xs : List α) (y ys) :
impl C xs y (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys) = suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys) := by
rfl
variable (C)
/--
`levenshtein C xs ys` computes the Levenshtein distance
(using the cost functions provided by a `C : Cost α β δ`)
from the list `xs` to the list `ys`.
Note that if the cost functions do not satisfy the inequalities
* `C.delete a + C.insert b ≥ C.substitute a b`
* `C.substitute a b + C.substitute b c ≥ C.substitute a c`
(or if any values are negative)
then the edit distance calculated here may not agree with the general
geodesic distance on the edit graph.
-/
def levenshtein (xs : List α) (ys : List β) : δ :=
let ⟨r, w⟩ := suffixLevenshtein C xs ys
r[0]
variable {C}
theorem suffixLevenshtein_nil_nil : (suffixLevenshtein C [] []).1 = [0] := by
rfl
-- Not sure if this belongs in the main `List` API, or can stay local.
theorem List.eq_of_length_one (x : List α) (w : x.length = 1) :
have : 0 < x.length := lt_of_lt_of_eq Nat.zero_lt_one w.symm
x = [x[0]] := by
match x, w with
| [r], _ => rfl
theorem suffixLevenshtein_nil' (ys : List β) :
(suffixLevenshtein C [] ys).1 = [levenshtein C [] ys] :=
List.eq_of_length_one _ (suffixLevenshtein_length [] _)
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₂ (xs : List α) (y ys) :
suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys) = (impl C xs) y (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys) :=
rfl
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_aux {α} {x y : { l : List α // 0 < l.length }}
(w₀ : x.1[0]'x.2 = y.1[0]'y.2) (w : x.1.tail = y.1.tail) : x = y := by
match x, y with
| ⟨hx :: tx, _⟩, ⟨hy :: ty, _⟩ => simp_all
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁
(x : α) (xs ys) :
suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys =
⟨levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys ::
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1, by simp⟩ := by
induction ys with
| nil =>
dsimp [levenshtein, suffixLevenshtein]
| cons y ys ih =>
apply suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_aux
· rfl
· rw [suffixLevenshtein_cons₂ (x :: xs), ih, impl_cons]
· rfl
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_length]
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst (x : α) (xs ys) :
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1 =
levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys ::
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1 := by
simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁]
|
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons_cons_fst_get_zero
(x : α) (xs y ys) (w : 0 < (suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) (y :: ys)).val.length) :
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) (y :: ys)).1[0]'w =
let ⟨dx, _⟩ := suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys)
let ⟨dy, _⟩ := suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys
let ⟨dxy, _⟩ := suffixLevenshtein C xs ys
min
(C.delete x + dx[0])
(min
(C.insert y + dy[0])
(C.substitute x y + dxy[0])) := by
conv =>
lhs
dsimp only [suffixLevenshtein_cons₂]
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁]
rw [impl_cons_fst_zero]
| Mathlib/Data/List/EditDistance/Defs.lean | 247 | 263 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
| theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 331 | 333 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-!
# Derivative is measurable
In this file we prove that the derivative of any function with complete codomain is a measurable
function. Namely, we prove:
* `measurableSet_of_differentiableAt`: the set `{x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x}` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv`: the function `fderiv 𝕜 f` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv_apply_const`: for a fixed vector `y`, the function `fun x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 f x y`
is measurable;
* `measurable_deriv`: the function `deriv f` is measurable (for `f : 𝕜 → F`).
We also show the same results for the right derivative on the real line
(see `measurable_derivWithin_Ici` and `measurable_derivWithin_Ioi`), following the same
proof strategy.
We also prove measurability statements for functions depending on a parameter: for `f : α → E → F`,
we show the measurability of `(p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2`. This requires additional
assumptions. We give versions of the above statements (appending `with_param` to their names) when
`f` is continuous and `E` is locally compact.
## Implementation
We give a proof that avoids second-countability issues, by expressing the differentiability set
as a function of open sets in the following way. Define `A (L, r, ε)` to be the set of points
where, on a ball of radius roughly `r` around `x`, the function is uniformly approximated by the
linear map `L`, up to `ε r`. It is an open set.
Let also `B (L, r, s, ε) = A (L, r, ε) ∩ A (L, s, ε)`: we require that at two possibly different
scales `r` and `s`, the function is well approximated by the linear map `L`. It is also open.
We claim that the differentiability set of `f` is exactly
`D = ⋂ ε > 0, ⋃ δ > 0, ⋂ r, s < δ, ⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)`.
In other words, for any `ε > 0`, we require that there is a size `δ` such that, for any two scales
below this size, the function is well approximated by a linear map, common to the two scales.
The set `⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)` is open, as a union of open sets. Converting the intersections and
unions to countable ones (using real numbers of the form `2 ^ (-n)`), it follows that the
differentiability set is measurable.
To prove the claim, there are two inclusions. One is trivial: if the function is differentiable
at `x`, then `x` belongs to `D` (just take `L` to be the derivative, and use that the
differentiability exactly says that the map is well approximated by `L`). This is proved in
`mem_A_of_differentiable` and `differentiable_set_subset_D`.
For the other direction, the difficulty is that `L` in the union may depend on `ε, r, s`. The key
point is that, in fact, it doesn't depend too much on them. First, if `x` belongs both to
`A (L, r, ε)` and `A (L', r, ε)`, then `L` and `L'` have to be close on a shell, and thus
`‖L - L'‖` is bounded by `ε` (see `norm_sub_le_of_mem_A`). Assume now `x ∈ D`. If one has two maps
`L` and `L'` such that `x` belongs to `A (L, r, ε)` and to `A (L', r', ε')`, one deduces that `L` is
close to `L'` by arguing as follows. Consider another scale `s` smaller than `r` and `r'`. Take a
linear map `L₁` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r` and `s` w.r.t. `ε` (it exists as
`x` belongs to `D`). Take also `L₂` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r'` and `s`
w.r.t. `ε'`. Then `L₁` is close to `L` (as they are close on a shell of radius `r`), and `L₂` is
close to `L₁` (as they are close on a shell of radius `s`), and `L'` is close to `L₂` (as they are
close on a shell of radius `r'`). It follows that `L` is close to `L'`, as we claimed.
It follows that the different approximating linear maps that show up form a Cauchy sequence when
`ε` tends to `0`. When the target space is complete, this sequence converges, to a limit `f'`.
With the same kind of arguments, one checks that `f` is differentiable with derivative `f'`.
To show that the derivative itself is measurable, add in the definition of `B` and `D` a set
`K` of continuous linear maps to which `L` should belong. Then, when `K` is complete, the set `D K`
is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable with a derivative in `K`.
## Tags
derivative, measurable function, Borel σ-algebra
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Metric Asymptotics Filter ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
theorem measurable_apply₂ [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither (E →L[𝕜] F) E]
[MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] : Measurable fun p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E => p.1 p.2 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.measurable
end ContinuousLinearMap
section fderiv
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : E → F} (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F))
namespace FDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to make sure that
this is an open set. -/
def A (f : E → F) (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ y ∈ ball x r', ∀ z ∈ ball x r', ‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ < ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a continuous linear map
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of continuous linear maps) that approximates well the
function `f` (up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) : Set E :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem isOpen_A (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : IsOpen (A f L r ε) := by
rw [Metric.isOpen_iff]
rintro x ⟨r', r'_mem, hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between r'_mem.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le r'_mem.2)⟩
refine ⟨r' - s, by linarith, fun x' hx' => ⟨s, this, ?_⟩⟩
have B : ball x' s ⊆ ball x r' := ball_subset (le_of_lt hx')
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (B hy) z (B hz)
theorem isOpen_B {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {r s ε : ℝ} : IsOpen (B f K r s ε) := by
simp [B, isOpen_biUnion, IsOpen.inter, isOpen_A]
theorem A_mono (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [mem_ball.1 hy, r'r.2, @dist_nonneg _ _ y x]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : E}
(hy : y ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
apply le_of_lt
exact hr' _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans_lt r'mem.1) _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hz).trans_lt r'mem.1)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) r ε := by
let δ := (ε / 2) / 2
obtain ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩ :
∃ R > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, ‖f y - f x - fderiv 𝕜 f x (y - x)‖ ≤ δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
eventually_nhds_iff_ball.1 <| hx.hasFDerivAt.isLittleO.bound <| by positivity
refine ⟨R, R_pos, fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := right_mem_Ioc.2 <| half_lt_self hr.1
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - y)‖ =
‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x) - (f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x))‖ := by
simp only [map_sub]; abel_nf
_ ≤ ‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x)‖ + ‖f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x)‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ * ‖z - x‖ + δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
add_le_add (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hz)) (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hy))
_ ≤ δ * r + δ * r := by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm] at hz hy; gcongr
_ = (ε / 2) * r := by ring
_ < ε * r := by gcongr; exacts [hr.1, half_lt_self hε]
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {r ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hr : 0 < r) {x : E}
{L₁ L₂ : E →L[𝕜] F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε) (h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * ε := by
refine opNorm_le_of_shell (half_pos hr) (by positivity) hc ?_
intro y ley ylt
rw [div_div, div_le_iff₀' (mul_pos (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2) (zero_lt_one.trans hc))] at ley
calc
‖(L₁ - L₂) y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x) - (f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x))‖ := by
simp
_ ≤ ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x)‖ + ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
_ = 2 * ε * r := by ring
_ ≤ 2 * ε * (2 * ‖c‖ * ‖y‖) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * ‖c‖ * ε * ‖y‖ := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := by positivity
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨fderiv 𝕜 f x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q →
n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → E →L[𝕜] F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (by positivity) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * ‖c‖ * (ε / (12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε := by field_simp
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole ball of radius `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
have pos : 0 < 4 + 12 * ‖c‖ := by positivity
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos pos) (by norm_num)
rw [eventually_nhds_iff_ball]
refine ⟨(1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1), P, fun y hy => ?_⟩
-- We need to show that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
by_cases y_pos : y = 0
· simp [y_pos]
have yzero : 0 < ‖y‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr y_pos
have y_lt : ‖y‖ < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by simpa using mem_ball_iff_norm.1 hy
have yone : ‖y‖ ≤ 1 := le_trans y_lt.le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < ‖y‖ ∧ ‖y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_trans hk y_lt
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J1 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m (x + y - x)‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
positivity
· simpa only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, pow_succ, mul_one_div] using
h'k
have J2 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left] using J1
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ := by gcongr
-- use the previous estimates to see that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small.
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - f' y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y + (L e (n e) m - f') y‖ :=
congr_arg _ (by simp)
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ + 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
norm_add_le_of_le J2 <| (le_opNorm _ _).trans <| by gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y‖ := by field_simp [ne_of_gt pos]; ring
rw [← this.fderiv] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end FDerivMeasurableAux
open FDerivMeasurableAux
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
variable (𝕜 f)
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete set,
is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
-- Porting note: was
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D, isOpen_B.measurableSet, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [D, differentiable_set_eq_D K hK]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact isOpen_B.measurableSet
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt : MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete 𝕜 f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv : Measurable (fderiv 𝕜 f) := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
fderiv 𝕜 f ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } ∩ { _x | (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans fderiv_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete _ _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableAt _ _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv_apply_const [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (y : E) :
Measurable fun x => fderiv 𝕜 f x y :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.measurable_apply y).comp (measurable_fderiv 𝕜 f)
variable {𝕜}
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : Measurable (deriv f) := by
simpa only [fderiv_deriv] using measurable_fderiv_apply_const 𝕜 f 1
theorem stronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : StronglyMeasurable (deriv f) := by
borelize F
rcases h.out with h𝕜|hF
· exact stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2
⟨measurable_deriv f, isSeparable_range_deriv _⟩
· exact (measurable_deriv f).stronglyMeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) : AEMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(measurable_deriv f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_deriv f).aestronglyMeasurable
end fderiv
section RightDeriv
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable {f : ℝ → F} (K : Set F)
namespace RightDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `h ↦ h • L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to
make sure that this is open on the right. -/
def A (f : ℝ → F) (L : F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ᵉ (y ∈ Icc x (x + r')) (z ∈ Icc x (x + r')),
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a vector
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of vectors) such that `h • L` approximates well `f (x + h)`
(up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) : Set ℝ :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem A_mem_nhdsGT {L : F} {r ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) : A f L r ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', rr', hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between rr'.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le rr'.2)⟩
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT <| show x < x + r' - s by linarith] with x' hx'
use s, this
have A : Icc x' (x' + s) ⊆ Icc x (x + r') := by
apply Icc_subset_Icc hx'.1.le
linarith [hx'.2]
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (A hy) z (A hz)
theorem B_mem_nhdsGT {K : Set F} {r s ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ B f K r s ε) :
B f K r s ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
obtain ⟨L, LK, hL₁, hL₂⟩ : ∃ L : F, L ∈ K ∧ x ∈ A f L r ε ∧ x ∈ A f L s ε := by
simpa only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop] using hx
filter_upwards [A_mem_nhdsGT hL₁, A_mem_nhdsGT hL₂] with y hy₁ hy₂
simp only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨L, LK, hy₁, hy₂⟩
theorem measurableSet_B {K : Set F} {r s ε : ℝ} : MeasurableSet (B f K r s ε) :=
.of_mem_nhdsGT fun _ hx => B_mem_nhdsGT hx
theorem A_mono (L : F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [hy.1, hy.2, r'r.2]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : F} {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : ℝ}
(hy : y ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
have A : x + r / 2 ≤ x + r' := by linarith [r'mem.1]
exact hr' _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hy) _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hz)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : ℝ}
(hx : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (derivWithin f (Ici x) x) r ε := by
have := hx.hasDerivWithinAt
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff] at this
rcases mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset.1 (this (half_pos hε)) with ⟨m, xm, hm⟩
refine ⟨m - x, by linarith [show x < m from xm], fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨half_lt_self hr.1, le_rfl⟩
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ =
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x -
(f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x)‖ := by
congr 1; simp only [sub_smul]; abel
_ ≤
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ +
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ :=
(norm_sub_le _ _)
_ ≤ ε / 2 * ‖z - x‖ + ε / 2 * ‖y - x‖ :=
(add_le_add (hm ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩)
(hm ⟨hy.1, hy.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩))
_ ≤ ε / 2 * r + ε / 2 * r := by
gcongr
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hz.1, hz.2]
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hy.1, hy.2]
_ = ε * r := by ring
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {r x : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ε : ℝ) {L₁ L₂ : F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε)
(h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ε := by
suffices H : ‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ ≤ r / 2 * (4 * ε) by
rwa [norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (half_pos hr).le, mul_le_mul_left (half_pos hr)] at H
calc
‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ =
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂ -
(f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁)‖ := by
simp [smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂‖ +
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
_ = r / 2 * (4 * ε) := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := pow_pos (by norm_num) _
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨derivWithin f (Ici x) x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q → n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
(le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) (add_le_add_right (norm_add_le _ _) _))
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 12 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * (ε / 12) := mul_lt_mul' le_rfl he (le_of_lt P) (by norm_num)
_ = ε := by field_simp [(by norm_num : (12 : ℝ) ≠ 0)]
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has right derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
simp only [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole interval of length `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 16 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
filter_upwards [Icc_mem_nhdsGE <| show x < x + (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) by simp] with y hy
-- We need to show that `f y - f x - f' (y - x)` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y - x‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hy.1 with (rfl | xy)
· simp only [sub_self, zero_smul, norm_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
have yzero : 0 < y - x := sub_pos.2 xy
have y_le : y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by linarith [hy.2]
have yone : y - x ≤ 1 := le_trans y_le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < y - x ∧ y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y - x` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_of_lt_of_le hk y_le
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J : ‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ :=
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [one_div, inv_pow, left_mem_Icc, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
positivity
· simp only [pow_add, tsub_le_iff_left] at h'k
simpa only [hy.1, mem_Icc, true_and, one_div, pow_one] using h'k
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (y - x) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ := by rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg yzero.le]
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • f'‖ =
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m + (y - x) • (L e (n e) m - f')‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub, sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ + ‖y - x‖ * (12 * (1 / 2) ^ e) :=
norm_add_le_of_le J <| by rw [norm_smul]; gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (ε / 16) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
rw [← this.derivWithin (uniqueDiffOn_Ici x x Set.left_mem_Ici)] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableWithinAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end RightDerivMeasurableAux
open RightDerivMeasurableAux
variable (f)
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete
set, is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_d K hK, D, measurableSet_b, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact measurableSet_B
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set F) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_derivWithin_Ici [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] :
Measurable fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
(fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } ∩ { _x | (0 : F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans derivWithin_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
theorem stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici :
StronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) := by
borelize F
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨measurable_derivWithin_Ici f, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_count, ht⟩ : ∃ t : Set ℝ, t.Countable ∧ Dense t := exists_countable_dense ℝ
suffices H : range (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
IsSeparable.mono (t_count.image f).isSeparable.span.closure H
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
suffices H' : range (fun y ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) y) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
| H' (mem_range_self _)
apply range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
calc Ici x
= closure (Ioi x ∩ closure t) := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq.1 ht]
_ ⊆ closure (closure (Ioi x ∩ t)) := by
apply closure_mono
simpa [inter_comm] using (isOpen_Ioi (a := x)).closure_inter (s := t)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Measurable.lean | 730 | 736 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Rev
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
## Main declarations
There are three (main) ways to consider `Fin n` as a subtype of `Fin (n + 1)`, hence three (main)
ways to move between tuples of length `n` and of length `n + 1` by adding/removing an entry.
### Adding at the start
* `Fin.succ`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function for
all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `0` and for `i.succ` for all `i : Fin n`.
This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cons`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.cons a f : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the start. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ` and `a : α 0`. This is a special case of
`Fin.cases`.
* `Fin.tail`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.tail f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.tail f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ`.
### Adding at the end
* `Fin.castSucc`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.lastCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function
for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `last n` and for `i.castSucc` for all
`i : Fin n`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.snoc`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the end. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc` and `a : α (last n)`. This is a
special case of `Fin.lastCases`.
* `Fin.init`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.init f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.init f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc`.
### Adding in the middle
For a **pivot** `p : Fin (n + 1)`,
* `Fin.succAbove`: Send `i : Fin n` to
* `i : Fin (n + 1)` if `i < p`,
* `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)` if `p ≤ i`.
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a
function for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `p` and for `p.succAbove i`
for all `i : Fin n`.
* `Fin.insertNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.insertNth f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` in position `p`. In general, tuples can be
dependent functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (p.succAbove i)` and `a : α p`. This is a
special case of `Fin.succAboveCases`.
* `Fin.removeNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.removeNth p f : Fin n → α`
by forgetting the `p`-th value. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.removeNth f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (succAbove p i)`.
`p = 0` means we add at the start. `p = last n` means we add at the end.
### Miscellaneous
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Sort*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_of_ne h', update_of_ne this, cons_succ]
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the first element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.cons` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def consEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α 0 × (∀ i, α (succ i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := cons f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f 0, tail f)
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Sort*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => consCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail]
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
theorem comp_cons {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
theorem comp_tail {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
end Preorder
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
section Append
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
@[simp]
theorem append_left (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
@[simp]
theorem append_right (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
theorem append_right_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_left_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (i.cast (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
theorem append_castAdd_natAdd {f : Fin (m + n) → α} :
append (fun i ↦ f (castAdd n i)) (fun i ↦ f (natAdd m i)) = f := by
unfold append addCases
simp
end Append
section Repeat
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
def «repeat» (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (x.cast (Nat.zero_mul _)).elim0
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
theorem repeat_succ (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ Fin.cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
theorem repeat_rev (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (i : Fin n) (y : α i.castSucc) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α i.castSucc :=
q i.castSucc
theorem init_def {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.castSucc :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x i.castSucc = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {α : Sort*} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
lemma snoc_zero {α : Sort*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Sort*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α i.castSucc)
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (snoc_cast_add _ _)
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.castSucc y := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases with
| cast j => rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
| last => simp [Ne.symm]
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases <;> simp
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.snoc` is injective. -/
theorem snoc_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@snoc n α) := fun x y xₙ yₙ h ↦
⟨funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (castSucc i), by simpa using congr_fun h (last n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem snoc_inj {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc} {xₙ yₙ : α (last n)} :
snoc x xₙ = snoc y yₙ ↔ x = y ∧ xₙ = yₙ :=
snoc_injective2.eq_iff
theorem snoc_right_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) :
Function.Injective (snoc x) :=
snoc_injective2.right _
theorem snoc_left_injective (xₙ : α (last n)) : Function.Injective (snoc · xₙ) :=
snoc_injective2.left _
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp only [init, snoc, h, cast_eq, dite_true, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q := by
ext j
simp [init, Fin.ne_of_lt]
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_castSucc : init (update q i.castSucc y) = update (init q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [init]
· simp [init, h, castSucc_inj]
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Sort*} (q : Fin (n + 2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) := by
ext i
simp [tail, init, castSucc_fin_succ]
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Sort*} (a : β) (q : Fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (fun _ ↦ β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = 0
· simp [h, snoc, castLT]
set j := pred i h with ji
have : i = j.succ := by rw [ji, succ_pred]
rw [this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j.val < n
· set k := castLT j h' with jk
have : j = castSucc k := by rw [jk, castSucc_castLT]
rw [this, ← castSucc_fin_succ, snoc]
simp [pred, snoc, cons]
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last]
simp
theorem comp_snoc {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ snoc q y = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp [h, snoc, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the right is the same as `Fin.snoc`. -/
theorem append_right_eq_snoc {α : Sort*} {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) :
Fin.append x x₀ = Fin.snoc x (x₀ 0) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_left]
exact (@snoc_castSucc _ (fun _ => α) _ _ i).symm
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_right]
exact (@snoc_last _ (fun _ => α) _ _).symm
/-- `Fin.snoc` is the same as appending a one-tuple -/
theorem snoc_eq_append {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) :
snoc xs x = append xs (cons x Fin.elim0) :=
(append_right_eq_snoc xs (cons x Fin.elim0)).symm
theorem append_left_snoc {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (x : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs x) ys =
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons x ys) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..) := by
rw [snoc_eq_append, append_assoc, append_left_eq_cons, append_cast_right]; rfl
theorem append_right_cons {n m} {α : Sort*} (xs : Fin n → α) (y : α) (ys : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append xs (Fin.cons y ys) =
Fin.append (Fin.snoc xs y) ys ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ ..).symm := by
rw [append_left_snoc]; rfl
theorem append_cons {α : Sort*} (a : α) (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) :
Fin.append (cons a as) bs
= cons a (Fin.append as bs) ∘ (Fin.cast <| Nat.add_right_comm n 1 m) := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, -⟩
simp only [append, addCases, cons, castLT, cast, comp_apply]
rcases i with - | i
· simp
· split_ifs with h
· have : i < n := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [addCases, this]
· have : ¬i < n := Nat.not_le.mpr <| Nat.lt_succ.mp <| Nat.not_le.mp h
simp [addCases, this]
theorem append_snoc {α : Sort*} (as : Fin n → α) (bs : Fin m → α) (b : α) :
Fin.append as (snoc bs b) = snoc (Fin.append as bs) b := by
funext i
rcases i with ⟨i, isLt⟩
simp only [append, addCases, castLT, cast_mk, subNat_mk, natAdd_mk, cast, snoc.eq_1,
cast_eq, eq_rec_constant, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, castLT_mk]
split_ifs with lt_n lt_add sub_lt nlt_add lt_add <;> (try rfl)
· have := Nat.lt_add_right m lt_n
contradiction
· obtain rfl := Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (Nat.not_lt.mp nlt_add) isLt
simp [Nat.add_comm n m] at sub_lt
· have := Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (Nat.not_lt.mp lt_n) lt_add
contradiction
theorem comp_init {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ init q = init (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [init]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the last element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.snoc` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def snocEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α (last n) × (∀ i, α (castSucc i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f _ := Fin.snoc f.2 f.1 _
invFun f := ⟨f _, Fin.init f⟩
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it its initial `n`-tuple and its last element. -/
@[elab_as_elim, inline]
def snocCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort*}
(h : ∀ xs x, P (Fin.snoc xs x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [Fin.snoc_init_self]) <| h (Fin.init x) (x <| Fin.last _)
@[simp] lemma snocCases_snoc
{P : (∀ i : Fin (n+1), α i) → Sort*} (h : ∀ x x₀, P (Fin.snoc x x₀))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n, (Fin.init α) i) (x₀ : α (Fin.last _)) :
snocCases h (Fin.snoc x x₀) = h x x₀ := by
rw [snocCases, cast_eq_iff_heq, Fin.init_snoc, Fin.snoc_last]
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.snoc`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def snocInduction {α : Sort*}
{P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort*}
(h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀), P x → P (Fin.snoc x x₀)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => snocCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| snocInduction h0 h _) x
end TupleRight
section InsertNth
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {β : Sort*}
/- Porting note: Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
/-- Define a function on `Fin (n + 1)` from a value on `i : Fin (n + 1)` and values on each
`Fin.succAbove i j`, `j : Fin n`. This version is elaborated as eliminator and works for
propositions, see also `Fin.insertNth` for a version without an `@[elab_as_elim]`
attribute. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def succAboveCases {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) : α j :=
if hj : j = i then Eq.rec x hj.symm
else
if hlt : j < i then @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hlt) (p _)
else @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ <|
(Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne hj).resolve_left hlt) (p _)
-- This is a duplicate of `Fin.exists_fin_succ` in Core. We should upstream the name change.
alias forall_iff_succ := forall_fin_succ
-- This is a duplicate of `Fin.exists_fin_succ` in Core. We should upstream the name change.
alias exists_iff_succ := exists_fin_succ
lemma forall_iff_castSucc {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P (last n) ∧ ∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ lastCases h.1 h.2⟩
lemma exists_iff_castSucc {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P (last n) ∨ ∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc where
mp := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
induction' i using lastCases
· exact .inl hi
· exact .inr ⟨_, hi⟩
mpr := by rintro (h | ⟨i, hi⟩) <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩
theorem forall_iff_succAbove {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ P p ∧ ∀ i, P (p.succAbove i) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ succAboveCases p h.1 h.2⟩
lemma exists_iff_succAbove {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ P p ∨ ∃ i, P (p.succAbove i) where
mp := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
induction' i using p.succAboveCases
· exact .inl hi
· exact .inr ⟨_, hi⟩
mpr := by rintro (h | ⟨i, hi⟩) <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩
/-- Analogue of `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ` for `succAbove`. -/
theorem eq_self_or_eq_succAbove (p i : Fin (n + 1)) : i = p ∨ ∃ j, i = p.succAbove j :=
succAboveCases p (.inl rfl) (fun j => .inr ⟨j, rfl⟩) i
/-- Remove the `p`-th entry of a tuple. -/
def removeNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (f : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i) := fun i ↦ f (p.succAbove i)
/-- Insert an element into a tuple at a given position. For `i = 0` see `Fin.cons`,
for `i = Fin.last n` see `Fin.snoc`. See also `Fin.succAboveCases` for a version elaborated
as an eliminator. -/
def insertNth (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
α j :=
succAboveCases i x p j
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_same (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
insertNth i x p i = x := by simp [insertNth, succAboveCases]
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j))
(j : Fin n) : insertNth i x p (i.succAbove j) = p j := by
simp only [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (succAbove_ne _ _), succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt]
split_ifs with hlt
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : castPred ((succAbove i) j) H₁ = k
rw [castPred_succAbove _ _ hlt] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
· generalize_proofs H₀ H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : pred (succAbove i j) H₁ = k
rw [pred_succAbove _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 hlt)] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
@[simp]
theorem succAbove_cases_eq_insertNth : @succAboveCases = @insertNth :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma removeNth_insertNth (p : Fin (n + 1)) (a : α p) (f : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)) :
removeNth p (insertNth p a f) = f := by ext; unfold removeNth; simp
@[simp] lemma removeNth_zero (f : ∀ i, α i) : removeNth 0 f = tail f := by
ext; simp [tail, removeNth]
@[simp] lemma removeNth_last {α : Type*} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) : removeNth (last n) f = init f := by
ext; simp [init, removeNth]
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_comp_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) :
insertNth i x p ∘ i.succAbove = p :=
funext (insertNth_apply_succAbove i _ _)
theorem insertNth_eq_iff {p : Fin (n + 1)} {a : α p} {f : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)} {g : ∀ j, α j} :
insertNth p a f = g ↔ a = g p ∧ f = removeNth p g := by
simp [funext_iff, forall_iff_succAbove p, removeNth]
theorem eq_insertNth_iff {p : Fin (n + 1)} {a : α p} {f : ∀ i, α (p.succAbove i)} {g : ∀ j, α j} :
g = insertNth p a f ↔ g p = a ∧ removeNth p g = f := by
simpa [eq_comm] using insertNth_eq_iff
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.insertNth` is injective. -/
theorem insertNth_injective2 {p : Fin (n + 1)} :
Function.Injective2 (@insertNth n α p) := fun xₚ yₚ x y h ↦
⟨by simpa using congr_fun h p, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (succAbove p i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_inj {p : Fin (n + 1)} {x y : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)} {xₚ yₚ : α p} :
insertNth p xₚ x = insertNth p yₚ y ↔ xₚ = yₚ ∧ x = y :=
insertNth_injective2.eq_iff
theorem insertNth_left_injective {p : Fin (n + 1)} (x : ∀ i, α (succAbove p i)) :
Function.Injective (insertNth p · x) :=
insertNth_injective2.left _
theorem insertNth_right_injective {p : Fin (n + 1)} (x : α p) :
Function.Injective (insertNth p x) :=
insertNth_injective2.right _
/- Porting note: Once again, Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
theorem insertNth_apply_below {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j < i) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ k, α (i.succAbove k)) :
i.insertNth x p j = @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _
(succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h) (p <| j.castPred _) := by
rw [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (Fin.ne_of_lt h), dif_pos h]
/- Porting note: Once again, Lean told me `(fun x x_1 ↦ α x)` was an invalid motive, but disabling
automatic insertion and specifying that motive seems to work. -/
theorem insertNth_apply_above {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ k, α (i.succAbove k)) :
i.insertNth x p j = @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _
(succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h) (p <| j.pred _) := by
rw [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (Fin.ne_of_gt h), dif_neg (Fin.lt_asymm h)]
theorem insertNth_zero (x : α 0) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (succAbove 0 j)) :
insertNth 0 x p =
cons x fun j ↦ _root_.cast (congr_arg α (congr_fun succAbove_zero j)) (p j) := by
refine insertNth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, ?_⟩
ext j
convert (cons_succ x p j).symm
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_zero' (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) : @insertNth _ (fun _ ↦ β) 0 x p = cons x p := by
| simp [insertNth_zero]
theorem insertNth_last (x : α (last n)) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α ((last n).succAbove j)) :
insertNth (last n) x p =
snoc (fun j ↦ _root_.cast (congr_arg α (succAbove_last_apply j)) (p j)) x := by
refine insertNth_eq_iff.2 ⟨by simp, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 878 | 883 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
open AffineSubspace
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
theorem existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] {ps : Set P} (hnps : ps.Nonempty) {p : P} (hps : ps ⊆ s)
(hp : p ∉ s) (hu : ∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ s ∧ ps ⊆ (cs : Set P)) :
∃! cs₂ : Sphere P,
cs₂.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (s : Set P)) ∧ insert p ps ⊆ (cs₂ : Set P) := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.Nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps)
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩
simp only at hcc hcr hcccru
let x := dist cc (orthogonalProjection s p)
let y := dist p (orthogonalProjection s p)
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonalProjection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y)
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ cc
let cr₂ := √(cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂)
use ⟨cc₂, cr₂⟩
simp -zeta -proj only
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ (orthogonalProjection s p : P) :=
by simp
constructor
· constructor
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc))
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonalProjection_mem _)))
· intro p₁ hp₁
rw [Sphere.mem_coe, mem_sphere, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))]
rcases hp₁ with hp₁ | hp₁
· rw [hp₁]
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [div_div, sub_div', one_mul, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, add_div', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff, ycc₂]
ring
· rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp₁),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc, Subtype.coe_mk,
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp₁ hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hy0, abs_mul_abs_self]
· rintro ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩
simp only at hcc₃ hcr₃
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ, ∃ p0 ∈ s, cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonalProjection s) p)) +ᵥ p0 := by
rwa [mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)] at hcc₃
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p₁ ∈ ps, dist p₁ cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, fun p₁ hp₁ => dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp₁) hcr₃⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃'
obtain ⟨cr₃', hcr₃'⟩ := hcr₃'
have hu := hcccru ⟨cc₃', cr₃'⟩
simp only at hu
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩
-- Porting note: was
-- cases' hu with hucc hucr
-- substs hucc hucr
cases hu
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = √(cr * cr + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)) := by
obtain ⟨p0, hp0⟩ := hnps
have h' : ↑(⟨cc, hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc := rfl
rw [← dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0) hcr₃, hcc₃'', ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp0),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃', h',
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp0 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ |t₃|, ← mul_assoc,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
replace hcr₃ := dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert _ _) hcr₃
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃
rw [show
x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) = x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)
by ring,
add_left_inj] at hcr₃
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y := by field_simp [ycc₂, ← hcr₃, hy0]
subst ht₃
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃''
congr
rw [hcr₃val]
congr 2
field_simp [hy0]
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
theorem _root_.AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq {ι : Type*} [hne : Nonempty ι] [Finite ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent ℝ p) :
∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range p) ∧ Set.range p ⊆ (cs : Set P) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with m hm generalizing ι
· exfalso
have h := Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne
rw [hn] at h
exact lt_irrefl 0 h
· rcases m with - | m
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_one_iff] at hn
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn
haveI : Unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩
use ⟨p i, 0⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton]
constructor
· simp_rw [hi default, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨⟨⟩, by simp only [Metric.sphere_zero, Set.mem_singleton_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨cc, cr⟩
simp only
rintro ⟨rfl, hdist⟩
simp? [Set.singleton_subset_iff] at hdist says
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, Metric.mem_sphere, dist_self] at hdist
rw [hi default, hdist]
· have i := hne.some
let ι2 := { x // x ≠ i }
classical
have hc : Fintype.card ι2 = m + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype {x | x ≠ i}]
· rw [Finset.filter_not]
-- Porting note: removed `simp_rw [eq_comm]` and used `filter_eq'` instead of `filter_eq`
rw [Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _),
Finset.card_sdiff (Finset.subset_univ _), Finset.card_singleton, Finset.card_univ, hn]
simp
· simp
haveI : Nonempty ι2 := Fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
have ha2 : AffineIndependent ℝ fun i2 : ι2 => p i2 := ha.subtype _
replace hm := hm ha2 _ hc
have hr : Set.range p = insert (p i) (Set.range fun i2 : ι2 => p i2) := by
change _ = insert _ (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2)
rw [← Set.image_eq_range, ← Set.image_univ, ← Set.image_insert_eq]
congr with j
simp [Classical.em]
rw [hr, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
refine existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert (Set.range_nonempty _) (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) ?_ hm
convert ha.not_mem_affineSpan_diff i Set.univ
change (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2) = _
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
congr with j
simp
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The circumsphere of a simplex. -/
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
/-- The property satisfied by the circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
/-- The center of the circumsphere is the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The radius of the circumsphere is the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- All points lie in the circumsphere. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.2
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumsphere. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
/-- If there exists a distance that a point has from all vertices of a
simplex, the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace
spanned by that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter := by
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (fun x => dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr
have hr : ∃ (r : ℝ), ∀ (a : P),
a ∈ Set.range (fun (i : Fin (n + 1)) => s.points i) → dist a p = r := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
use r
refine Set.forall_mem_range.mpr ?_
exact hr
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) p] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq (orthogonalProjection_mem p) fun i => hr _ (Set.mem_range_self i)
/-- If a point has the same distance from all vertices of a simplex,
the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace spanned by
that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P} {r : ℝ}
(hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The orthogonal projection of the circumcenter onto a face is the
circumcenter of that face. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : #fs = m + 1) :
↑((s.face h).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) = (s.face h).circumcenter :=
haveI hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r := by
use s.circumradius
simp [face_points]
orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.circumcenter = s₂.circumcenter := by
have hs : s₁.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s₂.points) :=
h ▸ s₁.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have hr : ∀ i, dist (s₂.points i) s₁.circumcenter = s₁.circumradius := by
intro i
have hi : s₂.points i ∈ Set.range s₂.points := Set.mem_range_self _
rw [← h, Set.mem_range] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj⟩
rw [← hj, s₁.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius j]
exact s₂.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hs hr
/-- An index type for the vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter.
This is for use in calculations where it is convenient to work with
affine combinations of vertices together with the circumcenter. (An
equivalent form sometimes used in the literature is placing the
circumcenter at the origin and working with vectors for the vertices.) -/
inductive PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n : ℕ)
| pointIndex : Fin (n + 1) → PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
| circumcenterIndex : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
deriving Fintype
open PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
instance pointsWithCircumcenterIndexInhabited (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n) :=
⟨circumcenterIndex⟩
/-- `pointIndex` as an embedding. -/
def pointIndexEmbedding (n : ℕ) : Fin (n + 1) ↪ PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n :=
⟨fun i => pointIndex i, fun _ _ h => by injection h⟩
/-- The sum of a function over `PointsWithCircumcenterIndex`. -/
theorem sum_pointsWithCircumcenter {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] {n : ℕ}
(f : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → α) :
∑ i, f i = (∑ i : Fin (n + 1), f (pointIndex i)) + f circumcenterIndex := by
classical
have h : univ = insert circumcenterIndex (univ.map (pointIndexEmbedding n)) := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun _ => mem_univ _⟩
obtain i | - := x
· exact mem_insert_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ i))
· exact mem_insert_self _ _
change _ = (∑ i, f (pointIndexEmbedding n i)) + _
rw [add_comm, h, ← sum_map, sum_insert]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, not_exists]
rintro x ⟨_, h⟩
injection h
/-- The vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter. -/
def pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → P
| pointIndex i => s.points i
| circumcenterIndex => s.circumcenter
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to a `pointIndex` value,
equals `points` applied to that value. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_point {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (pointIndex i) = s.points i :=
rfl
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to `circumcenterIndex`, equals the
circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter circumcenterIndex = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The weights for a single vertex of a simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex j => if j = i then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
∑ j, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i j = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ (pointIndex i) (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- A single vertex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
symm
refine
affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _)
(by simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]) ?_
intro i hi hn
cases i
· have h : _ ≠ i := fun h => hn (h ▸ rfl)
simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter, h]
· rfl
/-- The weights for the centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i ∈ fs then (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1, if the `Finset` is nonempty. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))} (h : fs.Nonempty) :
∑ i, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, add_zero, ←
fs.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty ℝ h, ← sum_indicator_subset _ fs.subset_univ]
rcongr
/-- The centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
fs.centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs) := by
simp_rw [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, zero_smul, add_zero, centroidWeights,
← sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero (Function.const (Fin (n + 1)) (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹)
(fun i wi => wi • (s.points i -ᵥ Classical.choice AddTorsor.nonempty)) fs.subset_univ fun _ =>
zero_smul ℝ _,
Set.indicator_apply]
congr
/-- The weights for the circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => 0
| circumcenterIndex => 1
/-- `circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ circumcenterIndex (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
symm
refine affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _) rfl ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ _ hn <;> tauto
/-- The weights for the reflection of the circumcenter in an edge of a
simplex. This definition is only valid with `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -1
/-- `reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_ite,
sum_const, filter_or, filter_eq']
rw [card_union_of_disjoint]
· set_option simprocs false in simp
· simpa only [if_true, mem_univ, disjoint_singleton] using h
/-- The reflection of the circumcenter of a simplex in an edge, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem reflection_circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
reflection (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
have hc : #{i₁, i₂} = 2 := by simp [h]
-- Making the next line a separate definition helps the elaborator:
set W : AffineSubspace ℝ P := affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})
have h_faces :
(orthogonalProjection W s.circumcenter : P) =
↑((s.face hc).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) := by
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_subspace
simp [W]
rw [EuclideanGeometry.reflection_apply, h_faces, s.orthogonalProjection_circumcenter hc,
circumcenter_eq_centroid, s.face_centroid_eq_centroid hc,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
affineCombination_vsub, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, affineCombination_vsub,
weightedVSub_apply, sum_pointsWithCircumcenter]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_smul, add_smul, sub_smul,
centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, ite_smul, zero_smul, sub_zero,
apply_ite₂ (· + ·), add_zero, ← add_smul, hc, zero_sub, neg_smul, sub_self, add_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert sum_const_zero`
rw [← sum_const_zero]
congr
norm_num
end Simplex
end Affine
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Affine AffineSubspace Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is complete,
that contains a set of points, those points are cospherical if and
only if they are equidistant from some point in that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] [s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, hcr⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq h c] at hcr
exact ⟨orthogonalProjection s c, orthogonalProjection_mem _, hcr⟩
· exact fun ⟨c, _, hd⟩ => ⟨c, hd⟩
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is
finite-dimensional, that contains a set of points, those points are
cospherical if and only if they are equidistant from some point in
that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete h
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use r
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use c
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
exact ⟨⟨c, r⟩, fun sx hsx => Sphere.ext (hc sx hsx) (hr sx hsx)⟩
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- Suppose all distances from `p₁` and `p₂` to the points of a
simplex are equal, and that `p₁` and `p₂` lie in the affine span of
`p` with the vertices of that simplex. Then `p₁` and `p₂` are equal
or reflections of each other in the affine span of the vertices of the
simplex. -/
theorem eq_or_eq_reflection_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Simplex ℝ P n} {p p₁ p₂ : P} {r : ℝ}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points)))
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points))) (h₁ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₂ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₂ = r) :
p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₁ = reflection (affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) p₂ := by
set span_s := affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
have h₁' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₁
have h₂' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₂
rw [← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)]
at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨r₁, p₁o, hp₁o, hp₁⟩ := hp₁
obtain ⟨r₂, p₂o, hp₂o, hp₂⟩ := hp₂
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = p₁o := by
subst hp₁
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₁o
rw [h₁'] at hp₁
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₂) = p₂o := by
subst hp₂
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₂o
rw [h₂'] at hp₂
have h : s.points 0 ∈ span_s := mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_range_self _)
have hd₁ :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₁ h₁' h
have hd₂ :
dist p₂ s.circumcenter * dist p₂ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₂ h₂' h
rw [← hd₂, hp₁, hp₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter,
vadd_vsub, vadd_vsub, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right, real_inner_smul_right, ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at hd₁
by_cases hp : p = s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p
· rw [Simplex.orthogonalProjectionSpan] at hp
rw [hp₁, hp₂, ← hp]
simp only [true_or, eq_self_iff_true, smul_zero, vsub_self]
· have hz : ⟪p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p, p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p⟫ ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, inner_self_eq_zero] using hp
rw [mul_left_inj' hz, mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff] at hd₁
rw [hp₁, hp₂]
rcases hd₁ with hd₁ | hd₁
· left
rw [hd₁]
· right
rw [hd₁, reflection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection p r₂ s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan,
neg_smul]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 875 | 881 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
| MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 542 | 549 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ObjectProperty.ClosedUnderIsomorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Triangulated
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Localization
/-! # Triangulated subcategories
In this file, we introduce the notion of triangulated subcategory of
a pretriangulated category `C`. If `S : Subcategory W`, we define the
class of morphisms `S.W : MorphismProperty C` consisting of morphisms
whose "cone" belongs to `S` (up to isomorphisms). We show that `S.W`
has both calculus of left and right fractions.
## TODO
* obtain (pre)triangulated instances on the localized category with respect to `S.W`
* define the type `S.category` as `Fullsubcategory S.set` and show that it
is a pretriangulated category.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of `Triangulated.Subcategory`, we do not assume that the predicate
on objects is closed under isomorphisms (i.e. that the subcategory is "strictly full").
Part of the theory would be more convenient under this stronger assumption
(e.g. `Subcategory C` would be a lattice), but some applications require this:
for example, the subcategory of bounded below complexes in the homotopy category
of an additive category is not closed under isomorphisms.
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive ZeroObject
namespace Triangulated
open Pretriangulated
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ]
[Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C]
/-- A triangulated subcategory of a pretriangulated category `C` consists of
a predicate `P : C → Prop` which contains a zero object, is stable by shifts, and such that
if `X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ X₁⟦1⟧` is a distinguished triangle such that if `X₁` and `X₃` satisfy
`P` then `X₂` is isomorphic to an object satisfying `P`. -/
structure Subcategory where
/-- the underlying predicate on objects of a triangulated subcategory -/
P : ObjectProperty C
zero' : ∃ (Z : C) (_ : IsZero Z), P Z
shift (X : C) (n : ℤ) : P X → P (X⟦n⟧)
ext₂' (T : Triangle C) (_ : T ∈ distTriang C) : P T.obj₁ → P T.obj₃ → P.isoClosure T.obj₂
namespace Subcategory
variable {C}
| variable (S : Subcategory C)
lemma zero [S.P.IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms] : S.P 0 := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/Subcategory.lean | 66 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pierre-Alexandre Bazin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pierre-Alexandre Bazin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DFinsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# An additional lemma about coprime ideals
This lemma generalises `exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime` to the case of non-principal ideals.
It is on a separate file due to import requirements.
-/
namespace Ideal
variable {ι R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A finite family of ideals is pairwise coprime (that is, any two of them generate the whole ring)
iff when taking all the possible intersections of all but one of these ideals, the resulting family
of ideals still generate the whole ring.
For example with three ideals : `I ⊔ J = I ⊔ K = J ⊔ K = ⊤ ↔ (I ⊓ J) ⊔ (I ⊓ K) ⊔ (J ⊓ K) = ⊤`.
When ideals are all of the form `I i = R ∙ s i`, this is equivalent to the
`exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime` lemma. -/
theorem iSup_iInf_eq_top_iff_pairwise {t : Finset ι} (h : t.Nonempty) (I : ι → Ideal R) :
| (⨆ i ∈ t, ⨅ (j) (_ : j ∈ t) (_ : j ≠ i), I j) = ⊤ ↔
(t : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => I i ⊔ I j = ⊤ := by
haveI : DecidableEq ι := Classical.decEq ι
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum]
refine h.cons_induction ?_ ?_ <;> clear t h
· simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton, Set.pairwise_singleton, iff_true]
refine fun a => ⟨fun i => if h : i = a then ⟨1, ?_⟩ else 0, ?_⟩
· simp [h]
· simp only [dif_pos, Submodule.coe_mk, eq_self_iff_true]
intro a t hat h ih
rw [Finset.coe_cons,
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric fun i j (h : I i ⊔ I j = ⊤) ↦ (sup_comm _ _).trans h]
constructor
· rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
rw [Finset.sum_cons] at hμ
-- Porting note: `refine` yields goals in a different order than in lean3.
refine ⟨ih.mp ⟨Pi.single h.choose ⟨μ a, ?a1⟩ + fun i => ⟨μ i, ?a2⟩, ?a3⟩, fun b hb ab => ?a4⟩
case a1 =>
have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ a)
rw [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
--for some reason `simp only [mem_iInf]` times out
intro i
specialize this i
rw [mem_iInf, mem_iInf] at this ⊢
intro hi _
apply this (Finset.subset_cons _ hi)
rintro rfl
exact hat hi
case a2 =>
have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ i)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
intro j hj ij
exact this _ (Finset.subset_cons _ hj) ij
case a3 =>
rw [← @if_pos _ _ h.choose_spec R (μ a) 0, ← Finset.sum_pi_single', ← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
at hμ
convert hμ
rename_i i _
rw [Pi.add_apply, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hi : i = h.choose
· rw [hi, Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same, Submodule.coe_mk]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hi, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hi, Submodule.coe_zero]
case a4 =>
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
rw [add_comm] at hμ
refine ⟨_, ?_, _, ?_, hμ⟩
· refine sum_mem _ fun x hx => ?_
have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ x)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this
apply this _ (Finset.mem_cons_self _ _)
rintro rfl
exact hat hx
· have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ a)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this
exact this _ (Finset.subset_cons _ hb) ab.symm
· rintro ⟨hs, Hb⟩
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := ih.mpr hs
have := sup_iInf_eq_top fun b hb => Hb b hb (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb hat).symm
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup] at this
obtain ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huv⟩ := this
refine ⟨fun i => if hi : i = a then ⟨v, ?_⟩ else ⟨u * μ i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp only [mem_iInf] at hv ⊢
intro j hj ij
rw [Finset.mem_cons, ← hi] at hj
exact hv _ (hj.resolve_left ij)
· have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ i)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
intro j hj ij
rcases Finset.mem_cons.mp hj with (rfl | hj)
· exact mul_mem_right _ _ hu
· exact mul_mem_left _ _ (this _ hj ij)
· dsimp only
rw [Finset.sum_cons, dif_pos rfl, add_comm]
rw [← mul_one u] at huv
rw [← huv, ← hμ, Finset.mul_sum]
congr 1
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j hj
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
exact hat hj
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Ideal.lean | 31 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
/-! # Interactions between `R[X]` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`
This file contains the basic API for "pushing through" the isomorphism
`opRingEquiv : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]`. It allows going back and forth between a polynomial ring
over a semiring and the polynomial ring over the opposite semiring. -/
open Polynomial
open Polynomial MulOpposite
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ` and `Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]` sending each coefficient of a polynomial
to the corresponding element of the opposite ring. -/
def opRingEquiv (R : Type*) [Semiring R] : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Rᵐᵒᵖ[X] :=
((toFinsuppIso R).op.trans AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv).trans (toFinsuppIso _).symm
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `opRingEquiv R` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) :
opRingEquiv R (op (monomial n r : R[X])) = monomial n (op r) := by
simp only [opRingEquiv, RingEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
AddMonoidAlgebra.opRingEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.op_apply_apply, toFinsuppIso_apply, unop_op,
toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.mapRange_single, toFinsuppIso_symm_apply, ofFinsupp_single]
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C (a : R) : opRingEquiv R (op (C a)) = C (op a) :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 0 a
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_op_X : opRingEquiv R (op (X : R[X])) = X :=
opRingEquiv_op_monomial 1 1
theorem opRingEquiv_op_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
opRingEquiv R (op (C r * X ^ n : R[X])) = C (op r) * X ^ n := by
simp only [X_pow_mul, op_mul, op_pow, map_mul, map_pow, opRingEquiv_op_X, opRingEquiv_op_C]
/-! Lemmas to get started, using `(opRingEquiv R).symm` on the various expressions of
`Finsupp.single`: `monomial`, `C a`, `X`, `C a * X ^ n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (monomial n r) = op (monomial n (unop r)) :=
(opRingEquiv R).injective (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C (a : Rᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R).symm (C a) = op (C (unop a)) :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 0 a
@[simp]
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_X : (opRingEquiv R).symm (X : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op X :=
opRingEquiv_symm_monomial 1 1
theorem opRingEquiv_symm_C_mul_X_pow (r : Rᵐᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) :
(opRingEquiv R).symm (C r * X ^ n : Rᵐᵒᵖ[X]) = op (C (unop r) * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, opRingEquiv_symm_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
/-! Lemmas about more global properties of polynomials and opposites. -/
@[simp]
theorem coeff_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) (n : ℕ) :
(opRingEquiv R p).coeff n = op ((unop p).coeff n) := by
induction' p with p
cases p
rfl
@[simp]
| theorem support_opRingEquiv (p : R[X]ᵐᵒᵖ) : (opRingEquiv R p).support = (unop p).support := by
induction' p with p
cases p
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Opposites.lean | 85 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Nimber.Basic
/-!
# Nim and the Sprague-Grundy theorem
This file contains the definition for nim for any ordinal `o`. In the game of `nim o₁` both players
may move to `nim o₂` for any `o₂ < o₁`.
We also define a Grundy value for an impartial game `G` and prove the Sprague-Grundy theorem, that
`G` is equivalent to `nim (grundyValue G)`.
Finally, we prove that the grundy value of a sum `G + H` corresponds to the nimber sum of the
individual grundy values.
## Implementation details
The pen-and-paper definition of nim defines the possible moves of `nim o` to be `Set.Iio o`.
However, this definition does not work for us because it would make the type of nim
`Ordinal.{u} → SetTheory.PGame.{u + 1}`, which would make it impossible for us to state the
Sprague-Grundy theorem, since that requires the type of `nim` to be
`Ordinal.{u} → SetTheory.PGame.{u}`. For this reason, we instead use `o.toType` for the possible
moves. We expose `toLeftMovesNim` and `toRightMovesNim` to conveniently convert an ordinal less than
`o` into a left or right move of `nim o`, and vice versa.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
open Ordinal Nimber
namespace PGame
/-- The definition of single-heap nim, which can be viewed as a pile of stones where each player can
take a positive number of stones from it on their turn. -/
noncomputable def nim (o : Ordinal.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
⟨o.toType, o.toType,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val⟩
termination_by o
decreasing_by all_goals exact ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).prop
@[deprecated "you can use `rw [nim]` directly" (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem nim_def (o : Ordinal) : nim o =
⟨o.toType, o.toType,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val⟩ := by
rw [nim]
theorem leftMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).LeftMoves = o.toType := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem rightMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).RightMoves = o.toType := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem moveLeft_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
HEq (nim o).moveLeft fun i : o.toType => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm i) := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem moveRight_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
HEq (nim o).moveRight fun i : o.toType => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm i) := by rw [nim]; rfl
/-- Turns an ordinal less than `o` into a left move for `nim o` and vice versa. -/
noncomputable def toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoToType o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (leftMoves_nim o).symm)
/-- Turns an ordinal less than `o` into a right move for `nim o` and vice versa. -/
noncomputable def toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).RightMoves :=
(enumIsoToType o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (rightMoves_nim o).symm)
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves) :
toLeftMovesNim.symm i < o :=
(toLeftMovesNim.symm i).prop
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).RightMoves) :
toRightMovesNim.symm i < o :=
(toRightMovesNim.symm i).prop
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveLeft i = nim (toLeftMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveLeft_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
@[deprecated moveLeft_nim (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias moveLeft_nim' := moveLeft_nim
theorem moveLeft_toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} (i) :
(nim o).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNim i) = nim i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight i = nim (toRightMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveRight_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
@[deprecated moveRight_nim (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias moveRight_nim' := moveRight_nim
theorem moveRight_toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} (i) :
(nim o).moveRight (toRightMovesNim i) = nim i := by
simp
/-- A recursion principle for left moves of a nim game. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def leftMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).LeftMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toLeftMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
/-- A recursion principle for right moves of a nim game. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def rightMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).RightMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).RightMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toRightMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toRightMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).LeftMoves := by
rw [nim]
exact isEmpty_toType_zero
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).RightMoves := by
rw [nim]
exact isEmpty_toType_zero
/-- `nim 0` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
def nimZeroRelabelling : nim 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
theorem nim_zero_equiv : nim 0 ≈ 0 :=
Equiv.isEmpty _
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneLeftMoves : Unique (nim 1).LeftMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| leftMoves_nim 1).unique
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneRightMoves : Unique (nim 1).RightMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| rightMoves_nim 1).unique
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).LeftMoves) = @toLeftMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).RightMoves) = @toRightMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toLeftMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toRightMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem nim_one_moveLeft (x) : (nim 1).moveLeft x = nim 0 := by simp
theorem nim_one_moveRight (x) : (nim 1).moveRight x = nim 0 := by simp
/-- `nim 1` has exactly the same moves as `star`. -/
def nimOneRelabelling : nim 1 ≡r star := by
rw [nim]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun i => ?_, fun j => ?_⟩
any_goals dsimp; apply Equiv.ofUnique
all_goals simpa [enumIsoToType] using nimZeroRelabelling
theorem nim_one_equiv : nim 1 ≈ star :=
nimOneRelabelling.equiv
@[simp]
theorem nim_birthday (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).birthday = o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim, birthday_def]
dsimp
rw [max_eq_right le_rfl]
convert lsub_typein o with i
exact IH _ (typein_lt_self i)
@[simp]
theorem neg_nim (o : Ordinal) : -nim o = nim o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim]; dsimp; congr <;> funext i <;> exact IH _ (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i)
instance impartial_nim (o : Ordinal) : Impartial (nim o) := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [impartial_def, neg_nim]
refine ⟨equiv_rfl, fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩ <;> simpa using IH _ (typein_lt_self _)
theorem nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : nim o ‖ 0 := by
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_lf, lf_zero_le]
use toRightMovesNim ⟨0, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho⟩
simp
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_equiv_zero_iff (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : (nim o₁ + nim o₂ ≈ 0) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
constructor
· refine not_imp_not.1 fun hne : _ ≠ _ => (Impartial.not_equiv_zero_iff (nim o₁ + nim o₂)).2 ?_
wlog h : o₁ < o₂
· exact (fuzzy_congr_left add_comm_equiv).1 (this _ _ hne.symm (hne.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h))
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_gf, zero_lf_le]
use toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inr <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨_, h⟩)
· simpa using (Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)).2
· rintro rfl
exact Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : nim o₁ + nim o₂ ‖ 0 ↔ o₁ ≠ o₂ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, Impartial.not_fuzzy_zero_iff, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem nim_equiv_iff_eq {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : (nim o₁ ≈ nim o₂) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
/-- The Grundy value of an impartial game is recursively defined as the minimum excluded value
(the infimum of the complement) of the Grundy values of either its left or right options.
This is the ordinal which corresponds to the game of nim that the game is equivalent to.
This function takes a value in `Nimber`. This is a type synonym for the ordinals which has the same
ordering, but addition in `Nimber` is such that it corresponds to the grundy value of the addition
of games. See that file for more information on nimbers and their arithmetic. -/
noncomputable def grundyValue (G : PGame.{u}) : Nimber.{u} :=
sInf (Set.range fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i))ᶜ
termination_by G
theorem grundyValue_eq_sInf_moveLeft (G : PGame) :
grundyValue G = sInf (Set.range (grundyValue ∘ G.moveLeft))ᶜ := by
rw [grundyValue]; rfl
theorem grundyValue_ne_moveLeft {G : PGame} (i : G.LeftMoves) :
grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) ≠ grundyValue G := by
conv_rhs => rw [grundyValue_eq_sInf_moveLeft]
have := csInf_mem (nonempty_of_not_bddAbove <|
Nimber.not_bddAbove_compl_of_small (Set.range fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)))
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_range, not_exists] at this
exact this _
theorem le_grundyValue_of_Iio_subset_moveLeft {G : PGame} {o : Nimber}
(h : Set.Iio o ⊆ Set.range (grundyValue ∘ G.moveLeft)) : o ≤ grundyValue G := by
by_contra! ho
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h ho
exact grundyValue_ne_moveLeft i hi
theorem exists_grundyValue_moveLeft_of_lt {G : PGame} {o : Nimber} (h : o < grundyValue G) :
∃ i, grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) = o := by
rw [grundyValue_eq_sInf_moveLeft] at h
by_contra ha
exact h.not_le (csInf_le' ha)
theorem grundyValue_le_of_forall_moveLeft {G : PGame} {o : Nimber}
(h : ∀ i, grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) ≠ o) : G.grundyValue ≤ o := by
contrapose! h
exact exists_grundyValue_moveLeft_of_lt h
/-- The **Sprague-Grundy theorem** states that every impartial game is equivalent to a game of nim,
namely the game of nim corresponding to the game's Grundy value. -/
theorem equiv_nim_grundyValue (G : PGame.{u}) [G.Impartial] :
G ≈ nim (toOrdinal (grundyValue G)) := by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, ← Impartial.forall_leftMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero]
intro x
apply leftMoves_add_cases x <;>
intro i
· rw [add_moveLeft_inl,
← fuzzy_congr_left (add_congr_left (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue _))),
nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff]
exact grundyValue_ne_moveLeft i
| · rw [add_moveLeft_inr, ← Impartial.exists_left_move_equiv_iff_fuzzy_zero]
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := exists_grundyValue_moveLeft_of_lt <| toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt i
use toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inl j)
rw [add_moveLeft_inl, moveLeft_nim]
exact Equiv.trans (add_congr_left (equiv_nim_grundyValue _)) (hj ▸ Impartial.add_self _)
termination_by G
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim {G : PGame} [G.Impartial] {o : Nimber} :
grundyValue G = o ↔ G ≈ nim (toOrdinal o) :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact equiv_nim_grundyValue G,
by intro h; rw [← nim_equiv_iff_eq]; exact Equiv.trans (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue G)) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nim_grundyValue (o : Ordinal.{u}) : grundyValue (nim o) = ∗o :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 PGame.equiv_rfl
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv (G H : PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] :
grundyValue G = grundyValue H ↔ (G ≈ H) :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.trans (equiv_congr_left.1 (equiv_nim_grundyValue H) _).symm
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_zero : grundyValue 0 = 0 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_zero_equiv)
theorem grundyValue_iff_equiv_zero (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue G = 0 ↔ G ≈ 0 := by
rw [← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv, grundyValue_zero]
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_star : grundyValue star = 1 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_one_equiv)
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_neg (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue (-G) = grundyValue G := by
rw [grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim, neg_equiv_iff, neg_nim, ← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim]
theorem grundyValue_eq_sInf_moveRight (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] :
grundyValue G = sInf (Set.range (grundyValue ∘ G.moveRight))ᶜ := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Nim.lean | 272 | 308 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Frobenius
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Verschiebung
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.MulP
/-!
## Identities between operations on the ring of Witt vectors
In this file we derive common identities between the Frobenius and Verschiebung operators.
## Main declarations
* `frobenius_verschiebung`: the composition of Frobenius and Verschiebung is multiplication by `p`
* `verschiebung_mul_frobenius`: the “projection formula”: `V(x * F y) = V x * y`
* `iterate_verschiebung_mul_coeff`: an identity from [Haze09] 6.2
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
-- type as `\bbW`
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
noncomputable section
-- Porting note: `ghost_calc` failure: `simp only []` and the manual instances had to be added.
/-- The composition of Frobenius and Verschiebung is multiplication by `p`. -/
theorem frobenius_verschiebung (x : 𝕎 R) : frobenius (verschiebung x) = x * p := by
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ frobenius (verschiebung x) :=
IsPoly.comp (hg := frobenius_isPoly p) (hf := verschiebung_isPoly)
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ x * p := mulN_isPoly p p
ghost_calc x
ghost_simp [mul_comm]
/-- Verschiebung is the same as multiplication by `p` on the ring of Witt vectors of `ZMod p`. -/
theorem verschiebung_zmod (x : 𝕎 (ZMod p)) : verschiebung x = x * p := by
rw [← frobenius_verschiebung, frobenius_zmodp]
variable (p R)
theorem coeff_p_pow [CharP R p] (i : ℕ) : ((p : 𝕎 R) ^ i).coeff i = 1 := by
induction' i with i h
· simp only [one_coeff_zero, Ne, pow_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, ← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP,
verschiebung_coeff_succ, h, one_pow]
theorem coeff_p_pow_eq_zero [CharP R p] {i j : ℕ} (hj : j ≠ i) : ((p : 𝕎 R) ^ i).coeff j = 0 := by
induction' i with i hi generalizing j
· rw [pow_zero, one_coeff_eq_of_pos]
exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hj
· rw [pow_succ, ← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP]
cases j
· rw [verschiebung_coeff_zero, zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
· rw [verschiebung_coeff_succ, hi (ne_of_apply_ne _ hj), zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
theorem coeff_p [CharP R p] (i : ℕ) : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff i = if i = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with hi
· simpa only [hi, pow_one] using coeff_p_pow p R 1
· simpa only [pow_one] using coeff_p_pow_eq_zero p R hi
@[simp]
theorem coeff_p_zero [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff 0 = 0 := by
rw [coeff_p, if_neg]
exact zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem coeff_p_one [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff 1 = 1 := by rw [coeff_p, if_pos rfl]
theorem p_nonzero [Nontrivial R] [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
simpa only [h, zero_coeff, zero_ne_one] using coeff_p_one p R
theorem FractionRing.p_nonzero [Nontrivial R] [CharP R p] : (p : FractionRing (𝕎 R)) ≠ 0 := by
simpa using (IsFractionRing.injective (𝕎 R) (FractionRing (𝕎 R))).ne (WittVector.p_nonzero _ _)
variable {p R}
-- Porting note: `ghost_calc` failure: `simp only []` and the manual instances had to be added.
/-- The “projection formula” for Frobenius and Verschiebung. -/
theorem verschiebung_mul_frobenius (x y : 𝕎 R) :
verschiebung (x * frobenius y) = verschiebung x * y := by
have : IsPoly₂ p fun {R} [Rcr : CommRing R] x y ↦ verschiebung (x * frobenius y) :=
IsPoly.comp₂ (hg := verschiebung_isPoly)
(hf := IsPoly₂.comp (hh := mulIsPoly₂) (hf := idIsPolyI' p) (hg := frobenius_isPoly p))
have : IsPoly₂ p fun {R} [CommRing R] x y ↦ verschiebung x * y :=
IsPoly₂.comp (hh := mulIsPoly₂) (hf := verschiebung_isPoly) (hg := idIsPolyI' p)
ghost_calc x y
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> ghost_simp [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_charP_coeff_zero [CharP R p] (x : 𝕎 R) : (x * p).coeff 0 = 0 := by
rw [← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP, verschiebung_coeff_zero,
zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
theorem mul_charP_coeff_succ [CharP R p] (x : 𝕎 R) (i : ℕ) :
(x * p).coeff (i + 1) = x.coeff i ^ p := by
rw [← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP, verschiebung_coeff_succ]
theorem mul_pow_charP_coeff_zero [CharP R p] (x : 𝕎 R) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(x * p ^ n).coeff m = 0 := by
induction' n with n ih generalizing m
· contradiction
· rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
cases m with
| zero => exact mul_charP_coeff_zero _
| succ m' =>
rw [mul_charP_coeff_succ, ih, zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
simpa using h
theorem mul_pow_charP_coeff_succ [CharP R p] (x : 𝕎 R) {m n : ℕ} :
(x * p ^ n).coeff (m + n) = x.coeff m ^ (p ^ n) := by
induction' n with n ih generalizing m
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← add_assoc,mul_charP_coeff_succ, pow_succ, pow_mul]
congr
exact ih
theorem verschiebung_frobenius [CharP R p] (x : 𝕎 R) : verschiebung (frobenius x) = x * p := by
ext ⟨i⟩
· rw [mul_charP_coeff_zero, verschiebung_coeff_zero]
· rw [mul_charP_coeff_succ, verschiebung_coeff_succ, coeff_frobenius_charP]
theorem verschiebung_frobenius_comm [CharP R p] :
Function.Commute (verschiebung : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R) frobenius := fun x => by
rw [verschiebung_frobenius, frobenius_verschiebung]
/-!
## Iteration lemmas
-/
open Function
theorem iterate_verschiebung_coeff_eq_zero (x : 𝕎 R) {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(verschiebung^[n] x).coeff m = 0 := by
induction' n with n ih generalizing m
· contradiction
· rw [iterate_succ_apply']
| cases m with
| zero => exact verschiebung_coeff_zero _
| succ m' =>
rw [verschiebung_coeff_succ, ih]
simpa using h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Identities.lean | 150 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth, Patrick Massot, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
/-!
# Vector bundles
In this file we define (topological) vector bundles.
Let `B` be the base space, let `F` be a normed space over a normed field `R`, and let
`E : B → Type*` be a `FiberBundle` with fiber `F`, in which, for each `x`, the fiber `E x` is a
topological vector space over `R`.
To have a vector bundle structure on `Bundle.TotalSpace F E`, one should additionally have the
following properties:
* The bundle trivializations in the trivialization atlas should be continuous linear equivs in the
fibers;
* For any two trivializations `e`, `e'` in the atlas the transition function considered as a map
from `B` into `F →L[R] F` is continuous on `e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet` with respect to the operator
norm topology on `F →L[R] F`.
If these conditions are satisfied, we register the typeclass `VectorBundle R F E`.
We define constructions on vector bundles like pullbacks and direct sums in other files.
## Main Definitions
* `Trivialization.IsLinear`: a class stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear on its base
set.
* `Trivialization.linearEquivAt` and `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt` are the
(continuous) linear fiberwise equivalences a trivialization induces.
* They have forward maps `Trivialization.linearMapAt` / `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt`
and inverses `Trivialization.symmₗ` / `Trivialization.symmL`. Note that these are all defined
everywhere, since they are extended using the zero function.
* `Trivialization.coordChangeL` is the coordinate change induced by two trivializations. It only
makes sense on the intersection of their base sets, but is extended outside it using the identity.
* Given a continuous (semi)linear map between `E x` and `E' y` where `E` and `E'` are bundles over
possibly different base sets, `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` turns this into a continuous
(semi)linear map between the chosen fibers of those bundles.
## Implementation notes
The implementation choices in the vector bundle definition are discussed in the "Implementation
notes" section of `Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic`.
## Tags
Vector bundle
-/
noncomputable section
open Bundle Set Topology
variable (R : Type*) {B : Type*} (F : Type*) (E : B → Type*)
section TopologicalVectorSpace
variable {F E}
variable [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace B]
/-- A mixin class for `Pretrivialization`, stating that a pretrivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Pretrivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Pretrivialization
variable (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2 :=
Pretrivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
@[simps!]
protected def symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b := by
refine IsLinearMap.mk' (e.symm b) ?_
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet
· exact (((e.linear R hb).mk' _).inverse (e.symm b) (e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb) fun v ↦
congr_arg Prod.snd <| e.apply_mk_symm hb v).isLinear
· rw [e.coe_symm_of_not_mem hb]
exact (0 : F →ₗ[R] E b).isLinear
/-- A pretrivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearEquivAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F where
toFun y := (e ⟨b, y⟩).2
invFun := e.symm b
left_inv := e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb
right_inv v := by simp_rw [e.apply_mk_symm hb v]
map_add' v w := (e.linear R hb).map_add v w
map_smul' c v := (e.linear R hb).map_smul c v
open Classical in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet then e.linearEquivAt R b hb else 0
variable {R}
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [Pretrivialization.linearMapAt]
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem linearMapAt_eq_zero (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).left_inv y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).right_inv y
end Pretrivialization
variable [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
/-- A mixin class for `Trivialization`, stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Trivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Trivialization
variable (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
protected theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun y : E b => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 :=
Trivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
instance toPretrivialization.isLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] : e.toPretrivialization.IsLinear R :=
{ (‹_› : e.IsLinear R) with }
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A trivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
def linearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearEquivAt R b hb
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : E b) : e.linearEquivAt R b hb v = (e ⟨b, v⟩).2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_symm_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : F) : (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).symm v = e.symm b v :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
protected def symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ R b
theorem coe_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.symmₗ R b) = e.symm b :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt R b
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 :=
e.toPretrivialization.coe_linearMapAt b
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ_linearMapAt hb y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt_symmₗ hb y
variable (R) in
open Classical in
/-- A coordinate change function between two trivializations, as a continuous linear equivalence.
Defined to be the identity when `b` does not lie in the base set of both trivializations. -/
def coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
F ≃L[R] F :=
{ toLinearEquiv := if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
then (e.linearEquivAt R b (hb.1 :)).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2)
else LinearEquiv.refl R F
continuous_toFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e'.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.1 (mem_univ y)
· exact fun y => e'.mem_source.mpr hb.2
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id
continuous_invFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e'.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.2 (mem_univ y)
exact fun y => e.mem_source.mpr hb.1
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id }
theorem coe_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b) = (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
congr_arg (fun f : F ≃ₗ[R] F ↦ ⇑f) (dif_pos hb)
theorem coe_coordChangeL' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
(coordChangeL R e e' b).toLinearEquiv =
(e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
LinearEquiv.coe_injective (coe_coordChangeL _ _ hb)
theorem symm_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e'.baseSet ∩ e.baseSet) : (e.coordChangeL R e' b).symm = e'.coordChangeL R e b := by
apply ContinuousLinearEquiv.toLinearEquiv_injective
rw [coe_coordChangeL' e' e hb, (coordChangeL R e e' b).symm_toLinearEquiv,
coe_coordChangeL' e e' hb.symm, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_symm]
theorem coordChangeL_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩).2 :=
congr_fun (coe_coordChangeL e e' hb) y
theorem mk_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
(b, coordChangeL R e e' b y) = e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩ := by
ext
· rw [e.mk_symm hb.1 y, e'.coe_fst', e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
exact hb.2
· exact e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb y
theorem apply_symm_apply_eq_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
[e'.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F) :
e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, v)) = (b, e.coordChangeL R e' b v) := by
rw [e.mk_coordChangeL e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
/-- A version of `Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply` that fully unfolds `coordChange`. The
right-hand side is ugly, but has good definitional properties for specifically defined
trivializations. -/
theorem coordChangeL_apply' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, y))).2 := by
rw [e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
theorem coordChangeL_symm_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R]
{b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b).symm =
(e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2).symm.trans (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1) :=
congr_arg LinearEquiv.invFun (dif_pos hb)
end Trivialization
end TopologicalVectorSpace
section
namespace Bundle
/-- The zero section of a vector bundle -/
def zeroSection [∀ x, Zero (E x)] : B → TotalSpace F E := (⟨·, 0⟩)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_proj [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).proj = x :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_snd [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).2 = 0 :=
rfl
end Bundle
open Bundle
variable [NontriviallyNormedField R] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace R F] [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
[∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)] [FiberBundle F E]
/-- The space `Bundle.TotalSpace F E` (for `E : B → Type*` such that each `E x` is a topological
vector space) has a topological vector space structure with fiber `F` (denoted with
`VectorBundle R F E`) if around every point there is a fiber bundle trivialization which is linear
in the fibers. -/
class VectorBundle : Prop where
trivialization_linear' : ∀ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e], e.IsLinear R
continuousOn_coordChange' :
∀ (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e'],
ContinuousOn (fun b => Trivialization.coordChangeL R e e' b : B → F →L[R] F)
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet)
variable {F E}
instance (priority := 100) trivialization_linear [VectorBundle R F E] (e : Trivialization F (π F E))
[MemTrivializationAtlas e] : e.IsLinear R :=
VectorBundle.trivialization_linear' e
theorem continuousOn_coordChange [VectorBundle R F E] (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E))
[MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e'] :
ContinuousOn (fun b => Trivialization.coordChangeL R e e' b : B → F →L[R] F)
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :=
VectorBundle.continuousOn_coordChange' e e'
namespace Trivialization
/-- Forward map of `Trivialization.continuousLinearEquivAt` (only propositionally equal),
defined everywhere (`0` outside domain). -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def continuousLinearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →L[R] F :=
{ e.linearMapAt R b with
toFun := e.linearMapAt R b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
cont := by
rw [e.coe_linearMapAt b]
classical
refine continuous_if_const _ (fun hb => ?_) fun _ => continuous_zero
exact (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous (FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous
fun x => e.mem_source.mpr hb).snd }
/-- Backwards map of `Trivialization.continuousLinearEquivAt`, defined everywhere. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def symmL (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →L[R] E b :=
{ e.symmₗ R b with
toFun := e.symm b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
cont := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet
· rw [(FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous_iff]
exact e.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _) fun x ↦
mk_mem_prod hb (mem_univ x)
· refine continuous_zero.congr fun x => (e.symm_apply_of_not_mem hb x).symm }
variable {R}
theorem symmL_continuousLinearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : E b) : e.symmL R b (e.continuousLinearMapAt R b y) = y :=
e.symmₗ_linearMapAt hb y
theorem continuousLinearMapAt_symmL (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) : e.continuousLinearMapAt R b (e.symmL R b y) = y :=
e.linearMapAt_symmₗ hb y
variable (R) in
/-- In a vector bundle, a trivialization in the fiber (which is a priori only linear)
is in fact a continuous linear equiv between the fibers and the model fiber. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply symm_apply]
def continuousLinearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : E b ≃L[R] F :=
{ e.toPretrivialization.linearEquivAt R b hb with
toFun := fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 -- given explicitly to help `simps`
invFun := e.symm b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
continuous_toFun := (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous
(FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous fun _ => e.mem_source.mpr hb).snd
continuous_invFun := (e.symmL R b).continuous }
theorem coe_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
(e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb : E b → F) = e.continuousLinearMapAt R b :=
(e.coe_linearMapAt_of_mem hb).symm
theorem symm_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ((e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb).symm : F → E b) = e.symmL R b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem continuousLinearEquivAt_apply' (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
(x : TotalSpace F E) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
e.continuousLinearEquivAt R x.proj (e.mem_source.1 hx) x.2 = (e x).2 := rfl
variable (R)
theorem apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (z : E b) : e ⟨b, z⟩ = (b, e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb z) := by
ext
· refine e.coe_fst ?_
rw [e.source_eq]
exact hb
· simp only [coe_coe, continuousLinearEquivAt_apply]
protected theorem zeroSection (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {x : B}
(hx : x ∈ e.baseSet) : e (zeroSection F E x) = (x, 0) := by
simp_rw [zeroSection, e.apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt R x hx 0, map_zero]
variable {R}
theorem symm_apply_eq_mk_continuousLinearEquivAt_symm (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
(b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (z : F) :
e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm ⟨b, z⟩ = ⟨b, (e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb).symm z⟩ := by
have h : (b, z) ∈ e.target := by
rw [e.target_eq]
exact ⟨hb, mem_univ _⟩
apply e.injOn (e.map_target h)
· simpa only [e.source_eq, mem_preimage]
· simp_rw [e.right_inv h, coe_coe, e.apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem comp_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq_coord_change (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E))
[e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
(e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb.2) =
coordChangeL R e e' b := by
ext v
rw [coordChangeL_apply e e' hb]
rfl
end Trivialization
/-! ### Constructing vector bundles -/
variable (B F)
/-- Analogous construction of `FiberBundleCore` for vector bundles. This
construction gives a way to construct vector bundles from a structure registering how
trivialization changes act on fibers. -/
structure VectorBundleCore (ι : Type*) where
baseSet : ι → Set B
isOpen_baseSet : ∀ i, IsOpen (baseSet i)
indexAt : B → ι
mem_baseSet_at : ∀ x, x ∈ baseSet (indexAt x)
coordChange : ι → ι → B → F →L[R] F
coordChange_self : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i, ∀ v, coordChange i i x v = v
continuousOn_coordChange : ∀ i j, ContinuousOn (coordChange i j) (baseSet i ∩ baseSet j)
coordChange_comp : ∀ i j k, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i ∩ baseSet j ∩ baseSet k, ∀ v,
(coordChange j k x) (coordChange i j x v) = coordChange i k x v
/-- The trivial vector bundle core, in which all the changes of coordinates are the
identity. -/
def trivialVectorBundleCore (ι : Type*) [Inhabited ι] : VectorBundleCore R B F ι where
baseSet _ := univ
isOpen_baseSet _ := isOpen_univ
indexAt := default
mem_baseSet_at x := mem_univ x
coordChange _ _ _ := ContinuousLinearMap.id R F
coordChange_self _ _ _ _ := rfl
coordChange_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ := rfl
continuousOn_coordChange _ _ := continuousOn_const
instance (ι : Type*) [Inhabited ι] : Inhabited (VectorBundleCore R B F ι) :=
⟨trivialVectorBundleCore R B F ι⟩
namespace VectorBundleCore
variable {R B F} {ι : Type*}
variable (Z : VectorBundleCore R B F ι)
/-- Natural identification to a `FiberBundleCore`. -/
@[simps (config := mfld_cfg)]
def toFiberBundleCore : FiberBundleCore ι B F :=
{ Z with
coordChange := fun i j b => Z.coordChange i j b
continuousOn_coordChange := fun i j =>
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn
((Z.continuousOn_coordChange i j).prodMap continuousOn_id) }
-- TODO: restore coercion?
-- instance toFiberBundleCoreCoe : Coe (VectorBundleCore R B F ι) (FiberBundleCore ι B F) :=
-- ⟨toFiberBundleCore⟩
theorem coordChange_linear_comp (i j k : ι) :
∀ x ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j ∩ Z.baseSet k,
(Z.coordChange j k x).comp (Z.coordChange i j x) = Z.coordChange i k x :=
fun x hx => by
ext v
exact Z.coordChange_comp i j k x hx v
/-- The index set of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Index := ι
/-- The base space of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation -/
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
def Base := B
/-- The fiber of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation and
typeclass inference -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Fiber : B → Type _ :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.Fiber
instance topologicalSpaceFiber (x : B) : TopologicalSpace (Z.Fiber x) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.topologicalSpaceFiber x
instance addCommGroupFiber (x : B) : AddCommGroup (Z.Fiber x) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup F)
instance moduleFiber (x : B) : Module R (Z.Fiber x) :=
inferInstanceAs (Module R F)
/-- The projection from the total space of a fiber bundle core, on its base. -/
@[reducible, simp, mfld_simps]
protected def proj : TotalSpace F Z.Fiber → B :=
TotalSpace.proj
/-- The total space of the vector bundle, as a convenience function for dot notation.
It is by definition equal to `Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
protected def TotalSpace :=
Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber
/-- Local homeomorphism version of the trivialization change. -/
def trivChange (i j : ι) : PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.trivChange i j
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_trivChange_source (i j : ι) (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.trivChange i j).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_trivChange_source i j p
/-- Topological structure on the total space of a vector bundle created from core, designed so
that all the local trivialization are continuous. -/
instance toTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Z.TotalSpace :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.toTopologicalSpace
variable (b : B) (a : F)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coordChange (i j : ι) : Z.toFiberBundleCore.coordChange i j b = Z.coordChange i j b :=
rfl
/-- One of the standard local trivializations of a vector bundle constructed from core, taken by
considering this in particular as a fiber bundle constructed from core. -/
def localTriv (i : ι) : Trivialization F (π F Z.Fiber) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.localTriv i
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_apply {i : ι} (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
(Z.localTriv i) p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The standard local trivializations of a vector bundle constructed from core are linear. -/
instance localTriv.isLinear (i : ι) : (Z.localTriv i).IsLinear R where
linear x _ :=
{ map_add := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_add, localTriv_apply, mfld_simps]
map_smul := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smul, localTriv_apply, mfld_simps] }
variable (i j : ι)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTriv_source (p : Z.TotalSpace) : p ∈ (Z.localTriv i).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem baseSet_at : Z.baseSet i = (Z.localTriv i).baseSet :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTriv_target (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.localTriv i).target ↔ p.1 ∈ (Z.localTriv i).baseSet :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_localTriv_target i p
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symm_fst (p : B × F) :
(Z.localTriv i).toPartialHomeomorph.symm p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt p.1) p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symm_apply {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) (v : F) :
(Z.localTriv i).symm b v = Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt b) b v := by
apply (Z.localTriv i).symm_apply hb v
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_coordChange_eq {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) (v : F) :
(Z.localTriv i).coordChangeL R (Z.localTriv j) b v = Z.coordChange i j b v := by
rw [Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply', localTriv_symm_fst, localTriv_apply, coordChange_comp]
exacts [⟨⟨hb.1, Z.mem_baseSet_at b⟩, hb.2⟩, hb]
/-- Preferred local trivialization of a vector bundle constructed from core, at a given point, as
a bundle trivialization -/
def localTrivAt (b : B) : Trivialization F (π F Z.Fiber) :=
Z.localTriv (Z.indexAt b)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_def : Z.localTriv (Z.indexAt b) = Z.localTrivAt b :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_source_at : (⟨b, a⟩ : Z.TotalSpace) ∈ (Z.localTrivAt b).source := by
rw [localTrivAt, mem_localTriv_source]
exact Z.mem_baseSet_at b
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_apply (p : Z.TotalSpace) : Z.localTrivAt p.1 p = ⟨p.1, p.2⟩ :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.localTrivAt_apply p
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_apply_mk (b : B) (a : F) : Z.localTrivAt b ⟨b, a⟩ = ⟨b, a⟩ :=
Z.localTrivAt_apply _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTrivAt_baseSet : b ∈ (Z.localTrivAt b).baseSet :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAt_baseSet b
instance fiberBundle : FiberBundle F Z.Fiber :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.fiberBundle
instance vectorBundle : VectorBundle R F Z.Fiber where
trivialization_linear' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply localTriv.isLinear
continuousOn_coordChange' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨i', rfl⟩
refine (Z.continuousOn_coordChange i i').congr fun b hb => ?_
ext v
exact Z.localTriv_coordChange_eq i i' hb v
/-- The projection on the base of a vector bundle created from core is continuous -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_proj : Continuous Z.proj :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.continuous_proj
/-- The projection on the base of a vector bundle created from core is an open map -/
theorem isOpenMap_proj : IsOpenMap Z.proj :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.isOpenMap_proj
variable {i j}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) :
(Z.localTriv i).continuousLinearMapAt R b = Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b) i b := by
ext1 v
rw [(Z.localTriv i).continuousLinearMapAt_apply R, (Z.localTriv i).coe_linearMapAt_of_mem]
exacts [rfl, hb]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt {b₀ b : B}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).continuousLinearMapAt R b =
Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b) (Z.indexAt b₀) b :=
Z.localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symmL {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) :
(Z.localTriv i).symmL R b = Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt b) b := by
ext1 v
rw [(Z.localTriv i).symmL_apply R, (Z.localTriv i).symm_apply]
exacts [rfl, hb]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_symmL {b₀ b : B} (hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).symmL R b = Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b₀) (Z.indexAt b) b :=
Z.localTriv_symmL hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_coordChange_eq {b₀ b₁ b : B}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet ∩ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₁).baseSet)
(v : F) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).coordChangeL R (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₁) b v =
Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b₀) (Z.indexAt b₁) b v :=
Z.localTriv_coordChange_eq _ _ hb v
end VectorBundleCore
end
/-! ### Vector prebundle -/
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField R] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace R F] [TopologicalSpace B] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)]
open TopologicalSpace
open VectorBundle
/-- This structure permits to define a vector bundle when trivializations are given as local
equivalences but there is not yet a topology on the total space or the fibers.
The total space is hence given a topology in such a way that there is a fiber bundle structure for
which the partial equivalences are also partial homeomorphisms and hence vector bundle
trivializations. The topology on the fibers is induced from the one on the total space.
The field `exists_coordChange` is stated as an existential statement (instead of 3 separate
fields), since it depends on propositional information (namely `e e' ∈ pretrivializationAtlas`).
This makes it inconvenient to explicitly define a `coordChange` function when constructing a
`VectorPrebundle`. -/
structure VectorPrebundle where
pretrivializationAtlas : Set (Pretrivialization F (π F E))
pretrivialization_linear' : ∀ e, e ∈ pretrivializationAtlas → e.IsLinear R
pretrivializationAt : B → Pretrivialization F (π F E)
mem_base_pretrivializationAt : ∀ x : B, x ∈ (pretrivializationAt x).baseSet
pretrivialization_mem_atlas : ∀ x : B, pretrivializationAt x ∈ pretrivializationAtlas
exists_coordChange : ∀ᵉ (e ∈ pretrivializationAtlas) (e' ∈ pretrivializationAtlas),
∃ f : B → F →L[R] F, ContinuousOn f (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) ∧
∀ᵉ (b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F), f b v = (e' ⟨b, e.symm b v⟩).2
totalSpaceMk_isInducing : ∀ b : B, IsInducing (pretrivializationAt b ∘ .mk b)
namespace VectorPrebundle
variable {R E F}
/-- A randomly chosen coordinate change on a `VectorPrebundle`, given by
the field `exists_coordChange`. -/
def coordChange (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) {e e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)}
(he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) (he' : e' ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) (b : B) : F →L[R] F :=
Classical.choose (a.exists_coordChange e he e' he') b
theorem continuousOn_coordChange (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) {e e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)}
(he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) (he' : e' ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) :
ContinuousOn (a.coordChange he he') (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :=
(Classical.choose_spec (a.exists_coordChange e he e' he')).1
theorem coordChange_apply (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) {e e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)}
(he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) (he' : e' ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F) :
a.coordChange he he' b v = (e' ⟨b, e.symm b v⟩).2 :=
(Classical.choose_spec (a.exists_coordChange e he e' he')).2 b hb v
theorem mk_coordChange (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) {e e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)}
(he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) (he' : e' ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F) :
(b, a.coordChange he he' b v) = e' ⟨b, e.symm b v⟩ := by
ext
· rw [e.mk_symm hb.1 v, e'.coe_fst', e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
exact hb.2
· exact a.coordChange_apply he he' hb v
/-- Natural identification of `VectorPrebundle` as a `FiberPrebundle`. -/
def toFiberPrebundle (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) : FiberPrebundle F E :=
{ a with
continuous_trivChange := fun e he e' he' ↦ by
have : ContinuousOn (fun x : B × F ↦ a.coordChange he' he x.1 x.2)
((e'.baseSet ∩ e.baseSet) ×ˢ univ) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn
((a.continuousOn_coordChange he' he).prodMap continuousOn_id)
rw [e.target_inter_preimage_symm_source_eq e', inter_comm]
refine (continuousOn_fst.prodMk this).congr ?_
rintro ⟨b, f⟩ ⟨hb, -⟩
dsimp only [Function.comp_def, Prod.map]
rw [a.mk_coordChange _ _ hb, e'.mk_symm hb.1] }
/-- Topology on the total space that will make the prebundle into a bundle. -/
def totalSpaceTopology (a : VectorPrebundle R F E) : TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E) :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.totalSpaceTopology
/-- Promotion from a `Pretrivialization` in the `pretrivializationAtlas` of a
`VectorPrebundle` to a `Trivialization`. -/
def trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas (a : VectorPrebundle R F E)
{e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)} (he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) :
@Trivialization B F _ _ _ a.totalSpaceTopology (π F E) :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas he
theorem linear_trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas (a : VectorPrebundle R F E)
{e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)} (he : e ∈ a.pretrivializationAtlas) :
letI := a.totalSpaceTopology
Trivialization.IsLinear R (trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas a he) :=
letI := a.totalSpaceTopology
{ linear := (a.pretrivialization_linear' e he).linear }
variable (a : VectorPrebundle R F E)
theorem mem_trivialization_at_source (b : B) (x : E b) :
⟨b, x⟩ ∈ (a.pretrivializationAt b).source :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.mem_pretrivializationAt_source b x
@[simp]
theorem totalSpaceMk_preimage_source (b : B) :
.mk b ⁻¹' (a.pretrivializationAt b).source = univ :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.totalSpaceMk_preimage_source b
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_totalSpaceMk (b : B) :
Continuous[_, a.totalSpaceTopology] (.mk b) :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.continuous_totalSpaceMk b
/-- Make a `FiberBundle` from a `VectorPrebundle`; auxiliary construction for
`VectorPrebundle.toVectorBundle`. -/
def toFiberBundle : @FiberBundle B F _ _ _ a.totalSpaceTopology _ :=
a.toFiberPrebundle.toFiberBundle
/-- Make a `VectorBundle` from a `VectorPrebundle`. Concretely this means
that, given a `VectorPrebundle` structure for a sigma-type `E` -- which consists of a
number of "pretrivializations" identifying parts of `E` with product spaces `U × F` -- one
establishes that for the topology constructed on the sigma-type using
`VectorPrebundle.totalSpaceTopology`, these "pretrivializations" are actually
"trivializations" (i.e., homeomorphisms with respect to the constructed topology). -/
theorem toVectorBundle : @VectorBundle R _ F E _ _ _ _ _ _ a.totalSpaceTopology _ a.toFiberBundle :=
letI := a.totalSpaceTopology; letI := a.toFiberBundle
{ trivialization_linear' := by
rintro _ ⟨e, he, rfl⟩
apply linear_trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas
continuousOn_coordChange' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨e, he, rfl⟩ ⟨e', he', rfl⟩
refine (a.continuousOn_coordChange he he').congr fun b hb ↦ ?_
ext v
haveI h₁ := a.linear_trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas he
haveI h₂ := a.linear_trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas he'
rw [trivializationOfMemPretrivializationAtlas] at h₁ h₂
rw [a.coordChange_apply he he' hb v, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe,
Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply]
exacts [rfl, hb] }
end VectorPrebundle
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₁] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂]
variable {σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂}
variable {B' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B']
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜₁ F] [∀ x, Module 𝕜₁ (E x)] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
variable {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F'] {E' : B' → Type*}
[∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E' x)] [∀ x, Module 𝕜₂ (E' x)] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F' E')]
variable [FiberBundle F E] [VectorBundle 𝕜₁ F E]
variable [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E' x)] [FiberBundle F' E'] [VectorBundle 𝕜₂ F' E']
variable (F' E')
/-- When `ϕ` is a continuous (semi)linear map between the fibers `E x` and `E' y` of two vector
bundles `E` and `E'`, `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates F E F' E' x₀ x y₀ y ϕ` is a coordinate
change of this continuous linear map w.r.t. the chart around `x₀` and the chart around `y₀`.
It is defined by composing `ϕ` with appropriate coordinate changes given by the vector bundles
`E` and `E'`.
We use the operations `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt` and `Trivialization.symmL` in the
definition, instead of `Trivialization.continuousLinearEquivAt`, so that
`ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` is defined everywhere (but see
`ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates_eq`).
This is the (second component of the) underlying function of a trivialization of the hom-bundle
(see `hom_trivializationAt_apply`). However, note that `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` is
defined even when `x` and `y` live in different base sets.
Therefore, it is also convenient when working with the hom-bundle between pulled back bundles.
-/
def inCoordinates (x₀ x : B) (y₀ y : B') (ϕ : E x →SL[σ] E' y) : F →SL[σ] F' :=
((trivializationAt F' E' y₀).continuousLinearMapAt 𝕜₂ y).comp <|
ϕ.comp <| (trivializationAt F E x₀).symmL 𝕜₁ x
variable {E E' F F'}
/-- Rewrite `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` using continuous linear equivalences. -/
theorem inCoordinates_eq {x₀ x : B} {y₀ y : B'} {ϕ : E x →SL[σ] E' y}
(hx : x ∈ (trivializationAt F E x₀).baseSet) (hy : y ∈ (trivializationAt F' E' y₀).baseSet) :
inCoordinates F E F' E' x₀ x y₀ y ϕ =
((trivializationAt F' E' y₀).continuousLinearEquivAt 𝕜₂ y hy : E' y →L[𝕜₂] F').comp
(ϕ.comp <|
(((trivializationAt F E x₀).continuousLinearEquivAt 𝕜₁ x hx).symm : F →L[𝕜₁] E x)) := by
ext
simp_rw [inCoordinates, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe,
Trivialization.coe_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq, Trivialization.symm_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq]
/-- Rewrite `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` in a `VectorBundleCore`. -/
protected theorem _root_.VectorBundleCore.inCoordinates_eq {ι ι'} (Z : VectorBundleCore 𝕜₁ B F ι)
(Z' : VectorBundleCore 𝕜₂ B' F' ι') {x₀ x : B} {y₀ y : B'} (ϕ : F →SL[σ] F')
(hx : x ∈ Z.baseSet (Z.indexAt x₀)) (hy : y ∈ Z'.baseSet (Z'.indexAt y₀)) :
inCoordinates F Z.Fiber F' Z'.Fiber x₀ x y₀ y ϕ =
(Z'.coordChange (Z'.indexAt y) (Z'.indexAt y₀) y).comp
(ϕ.comp <| Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt x₀) (Z.indexAt x) x) := by
simp_rw [inCoordinates, Z'.trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt hy,
Z.trivializationAt_symmL hx]
end ContinuousLinearMap
end
| Mathlib/Topology/VectorBundle/Basic.lean | 972 | 987 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableSequence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
/-!
# Borel sigma algebras on spaces with orders
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx` (where Ixx is one of {Iio, Ioi, Iic, Ici, Ico, Ioc}):
The Borel sigma algebra of a linear order topology is generated by intervals of the given kind.
* `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem`, `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem`:
The Borel sigma algebra of a dense linear order topology is generated by intervals of a given
kind, with endpoints from dense subsets.
* `ext_of_Ico`, `ext_of_Ioc`:
A locally finite Borel measure on a second countable conditionally complete linear order is
characterized by the measures of intervals of the given kind.
* `ext_of_Iic`, `ext_of_Ici`:
A finite Borel measure on a second countable linear order is characterized by the measures of
intervals of the given kind.
* `UpperSemicontinuous.measurable`, `LowerSemicontinuous.measurable`:
Semicontinuous functions are measurable.
* `Measurable.iSup`, `Measurable.iInf`, `Measurable.sSup`, `Measurable.sInf`:
Countable supremums and infimums of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
* `Measurable.liminf`, `Measurable.limsup`:
Countable liminfs and limsups of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section OrderTopology
variable (α)
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio : borel α = .generateFrom (range Iio) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le ?_)
· rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_of_subbasis (@OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _)]
letI : MeasurableSpace α := MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iio)
have H : ∀ a : α, MeasurableSet (Iio a) := fun a => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases em (∃ b, a ⋖ b) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hcovBy
· rw [hb.Ioi_eq, ← compl_Iio]
exact (H _).compl
· rcases isOpen_biUnion_countable (Ioi a) Ioi fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_Ioi with ⟨t, hat, htc, htU⟩
have : Ioi a = ⋃ b ∈ t, Ici b := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ <| iUnion₂_subset fun b hb ↦ Ici_subset_Ioi.2 (hat hb)
refine Subset.trans ?_ <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self
simpa [CovBy, htU, subset_def] using hcovBy
simp only [this, ← compl_Iio]
exact .biUnion htc <| fun _ _ ↦ (H _).compl
· apply H
· rw [forall_mem_range]
intro a
exact GenerateMeasurable.basic _ isOpen_Iio
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi : borel α = .generateFrom (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio αᵒᵈ _ (by infer_instance : SecondCountableTopology α) _ _
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic :
borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iic) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Ioi]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici : borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Ici) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end OrderTopology
section Orders
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable {mδ : MeasurableSpace δ}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a) :=
isClosed_Ici.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ici : NullMeasurableSet (Ici a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ici.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a) :=
isClosed_Iic.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iic : NullMeasurableSet (Iic a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iic.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Icc a b) :=
isClosed_Icc.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Icc : NullMeasurableSet (Icc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Icc.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ici b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ici.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iic b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iic.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[Icc a b] x) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, nhdsWithin_inter]
infer_instance
instance atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atTop : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atBot : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance [R1Space α] : IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α) where
exists_measurable_subset := by
intro _ hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := mem_cocompact.mp hs
exact ⟨(closure t)ᶜ, ht.closure.compl_mem_cocompact, isClosed_closure.measurableSet.compl,
(compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure).trans hts⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {a b : α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le' : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_le'
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
-- we open this locale only here to avoid issues with list being treated as intervals above
open Interval
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iio : MeasurableSet (Iio a) :=
isOpen_Iio.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iio : NullMeasurableSet (Iio a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iio.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi a) :=
isOpen_Ioi.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioi : NullMeasurableSet (Ioi a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo a b) :=
isOpen_Ioo.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioo : NullMeasurableSet (Ioo a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioo.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioi.inter measurableSet_Iic
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioc : NullMeasurableSet (Ioc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ico : MeasurableSet (Ico a b) :=
measurableSet_Ici.inter measurableSet_Iio
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ico : NullMeasurableSet (Ico a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ico.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ioi b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iio b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iio.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[[[a, b]]] x) :=
nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
(isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ} {f g : δ → α}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : NullMeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure (α × α)} :
NullMeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } μ :=
measurableSet_lt'.nullMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_le [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ}
{f g : δ → α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_le'
theorem Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet (h : OrdConnected s) : MeasurableSet s := by
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y
have huopen : IsOpen u := isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_Ioo
have humeas : MeasurableSet u := huopen.measurableSet
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo
have : u ⊆ s := iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => iUnion₂_subset fun y hy =>
Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy)
rw [← union_diff_cancel this]
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurableSet
theorem IsPreconnected.measurableSet (h : IsPreconnected s) : MeasurableSet s :=
h.ordConnected.measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderClosedTopology α] (s t : Set α) :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ t, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
≤ borel α := by
apply generateFrom_le
borelize α
rintro _ ⟨a, -, b, -, -, rfl⟩
exact measurableSet_Ico
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → y ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
set S : Set (Set α) := { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel _ _)
letI : MeasurableSpace α := generateFrom S
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine generateFrom_le (forall_mem_range.2 fun a => ?_)
rcases hd.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top with ⟨t, hts, hc, htd, htb, -⟩
by_cases ha : ∀ b < a, (Ioo b a).Nonempty
· convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (u ∈ t) (_ : l < u) (_ : u ≤ a), Ico l u)
· ext y
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Ico]
constructor
· intro hy
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) y with ⟨l, hlt, hly⟩
rcases htd.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioo (ha y hy) with ⟨u, hut, hyu, hua⟩
exact ⟨l, hlt, u, hut, hly.trans_lt hyu, hua.le, hly, hyu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, -, u, -, -, hua, -, hyu⟩
exact hyu.trans_le hua
· refine MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun a ha => MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun b hb => ?_
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hab => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨a, hts ha, b, hts hb, hab, mem_singleton _⟩
· simp only [not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at ha
replace ha : a ∈ s := hIoo ha.choose a ha.choose_spec.fst ha.choose_spec.snd
convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (_ : l < a), Ico l a)
· symm
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, inter_eq_right, subset_def, mem_iUnion,
mem_Ici, mem_Iio]
intro x hx
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) x with ⟨z, hzt, hzx⟩
exact ⟨z, hzt, hzx.trans_lt hx, hzx⟩
· refine .biUnion hc fun x hx => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hlt => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨x, hts hx, a, ha, hlt, mem_singleton _⟩
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (by simp) fun _ _ hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ (l u : α), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → x ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
convert hd.orderDual.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux hbot fun x y hlt he => hIoo y x hlt _
using 2
· ext s
constructor <;> rintro ⟨l, hl, u, hu, hlt, rfl⟩
exacts [⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, Ico_toDual⟩, ⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, Ioc_toDual⟩]
· erw [Ioo_toDual]
exact he
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (by simp) fun _ _ hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l u, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all closed-open intervals. If
`α` is a conditionally complete linear order with no top element,
`MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ico` is an extensionality lemma with weaker assumptions on `μ` and
`ν`. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico_finite {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμν : μ univ = ν univ) (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) :
μ = ν := by
refine
ext_of_generate_finite _ (BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico α))
(isPiSystem_Ico (id : α → α) id) ?_ hμν
rintro - ⟨a, b, hlt, rfl⟩
exact h hlt
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all open-closed intervals. If
`α` is a conditionally complete linear order with no top element,
`MeasureTheory.Measure.ext_of_Ioc` is an extensionality lemma with weaker assumptions on `μ` and
`ν`. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc_finite {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμν : μ univ = ν univ) (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) :
μ = ν := by
refine @ext_of_Ico_finite αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› μ ν _ hμν fun a b hab => ?_
erw [Ico_toDual (α := α)]
exact h hab
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
closed-open intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico' {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [NoMaxOrder α]
(μ ν : Measure α) (hμ : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) : μ = ν := by
rcases exists_countable_dense_bot_top α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd, hsb, _⟩
have : (⋃ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ s) (_ : l < u), {Ico l u} : Set (Set α)).Countable :=
hsc.biUnion fun l _ => hsc.biUnion fun u _ => countable_iUnion fun _ => countable_singleton _
simp only [← setOf_eq_eq_singleton, ← setOf_exists] at this
refine
Measure.ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset
(BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico α)) (isPiSystem_Ico id id) ?_ this
?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨l, -, u, -, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨l, u, h, rfl⟩
· refine sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ?_
rcases hsd.exists_le' hsb x with ⟨l, hls, hlx⟩
rcases hsd.exists_gt x with ⟨u, hus, hxu⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨l, hls, u, hus, hlx.trans_lt hxu, rfl⟩, hlx, hxu⟩
· rintro _ ⟨l, -, u, -, hlt, rfl⟩
exact hμ hlt
· rintro _ ⟨l, u, hlt, rfl⟩
exact h hlt
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
open-closed intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc' {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [NoMinOrder α]
(μ ν : Measure α) (hμ : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) : μ = ν := by
refine @ext_of_Ico' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› _ μ ν ?_ ?_ <;> intro a b hab <;> erw [Ico_toDual (α := α)]
exacts [hμ hab, h hab]
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
closed-open intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ico {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
[BorelSpace α] [NoMaxOrder α] (μ ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ico a b) = ν (Ico a b)) : μ = ν :=
μ.ext_of_Ico' ν (fun _ _ _ => measure_Ico_lt_top.ne) h
/-- Two measures which are finite on closed-open intervals are equal if they agree on all
open-closed intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ioc {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
[BorelSpace α] [NoMinOrder α] (μ ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → μ (Ioc a b) = ν (Ioc a b)) : μ = ν :=
μ.ext_of_Ioc' ν (fun _ _ _ => measure_Ioc_lt_top.ne) h
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all left-infinite right-closed
intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Iic {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ∀ a, μ (Iic a) = ν (Iic a)) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_Ioc_finite μ ν ?_ fun a b hlt => ?_
· rcases exists_countable_dense_bot_top α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd, -, hst⟩
have : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s := directedOn_iff_directed.2 (Subtype.mono_coe _).directed_le
simp only [← biSup_measure_Iic hsc (hsd.exists_ge' hst) this, h]
rw [← Iic_diff_Iic, measure_diff (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hlt.le) nullMeasurableSet_Iic,
measure_diff (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hlt.le) nullMeasurableSet_Iic, h a, h b]
· rw [← h a]
exact measure_ne_top μ _
· exact measure_ne_top μ _
/-- Two finite measures on a Borel space are equal if they agree on all left-closed right-infinite
intervals. -/
theorem ext_of_Ici {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [BorelSpace α] (μ ν : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h : ∀ a, μ (Ici a) = ν (Ici a)) : μ = ν :=
@ext_of_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ ‹_› _ _ _ h
end MeasureTheory.Measure
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_uIcc : MeasurableSet (uIcc a b) :=
measurableSet_Icc
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_uIoc : MeasurableSet (uIoc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioc
variable [SecondCountableTopology α]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.max {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => max (f a) (g a) := by
simpa only [max_def'] using hf.piecewise (measurableSet_le hg hf) hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
nonrec theorem AEMeasurable.max {f g : δ → α} {μ : Measure δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun a => max (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨fun a => max (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.max hg.measurable_mk,
EventuallyEq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.min {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => min (f a) (g a) := by
simpa only [min_def] using hf.piecewise (measurableSet_le hf hg) hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
nonrec theorem AEMeasurable.min {f g : δ → α} {μ : Measure δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun a => min (f a) (g a)) μ :=
⟨fun a => min (hf.mk f a) (hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.min hg.measurable_mk,
EventuallyEq.comp₂ hf.ae_eq_mk _ hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
end LinearOrder
section Lattice
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [BorelSpace γ]
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousSup.measurableSup [Max γ] [ContinuousSup γ] :
MeasurableSup γ where
measurable_const_sup _ := (continuous_const.sup continuous_id).measurable
measurable_sup_const _ := (continuous_id.sup continuous_const).measurable
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousSup.measurableSup₂ [SecondCountableTopology γ] [Max γ]
[ContinuousSup γ] : MeasurableSup₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_sup.measurable⟩
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousInf.measurableInf [Min γ] [ContinuousInf γ] :
MeasurableInf γ where
measurable_const_inf _ := (continuous_const.inf continuous_id).measurable
measurable_inf_const _ := (continuous_id.inf continuous_const).measurable
instance (priority := 100) ContinuousInf.measurableInf₂ [SecondCountableTopology γ] [Min γ]
[ContinuousInf γ] : MeasurableInf₂ γ :=
⟨continuous_inf.measurable⟩
end Lattice
end Orders
section BorelSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [BorelSpace α]
variable [TopologicalSpace β] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [BorelSpace β]
variable {mδ : MeasurableSpace δ}
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
theorem measurable_of_Iio {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Iio x)) : Measurable f := by
convert measurable_generateFrom (α := δ) _
· exact BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio _)
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact hf x
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.measurable [TopologicalSpace δ] [OpensMeasurableSpace δ] {f : δ → α}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_Iio fun y => (hf.isOpen_preimage y).measurableSet
theorem measurable_of_Ioi {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Ioi x)) : Measurable f := by
convert measurable_generateFrom (α := δ) _
· exact BorelSpace.measurable_eq.trans (borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi _)
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact hf x
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.measurable [TopologicalSpace δ] [OpensMeasurableSpace δ] {f : δ → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_Ioi fun y => (hf.isOpen_preimage y).measurableSet
theorem measurable_of_Iic {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Iic x)) : Measurable f := by
apply measurable_of_Ioi
simp_rw [← compl_Iic, preimage_compl, MeasurableSet.compl_iff]
assumption
theorem measurable_of_Ici {f : δ → α} (hf : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' Ici x)) : Measurable f := by
apply measurable_of_Iio
simp_rw [← compl_Ici, preimage_compl, MeasurableSet.compl_iff]
assumption
/-- If a function is the least upper bound of countably many measurable functions,
then it is measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.isLUB {ι} [Countable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g : δ → α} (hf : ∀ i, Measurable (f i))
(hg : ∀ b, IsLUB { a | ∃ i, f i b = a } (g b)) : Measurable g := by
change ∀ b, IsLUB (range fun i => f i b) (g b) at hg
rw [‹BorelSpace α›.measurable_eq, borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi α]
apply measurable_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp_rw [Set.preimage, mem_Ioi, lt_isLUB_iff (hg _), exists_range_iff, setOf_exists]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => hf i (isOpen_lt' _).measurableSet
/-- If a function is the least upper bound of countably many measurable functions on a measurable
set `s`, and coincides with a measurable function outside of `s`, then it is measurable. -/
| theorem Measurable.isLUB_of_mem {ι} [Countable ι] {f : ι → δ → α} {g g' : δ → α}
(hf : ∀ i, Measurable (f i))
{s : Set δ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hg : ∀ b ∈ s, IsLUB { a | ∃ i, f i b = a } (g b))
(hg' : EqOn g g' sᶜ) (g'_meas : Measurable g') : Measurable g := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Order.lean | 551 | 554 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Uthaiwat, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Nilpotency in polynomial rings.
This file is a place for results related to nilpotency in (single-variable) polynomial rings.
## Main results:
* `Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff`
* `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`
-/
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} {r : R}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {P : R[X]}
lemma isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent ((C r) * X ^ n) := by
refine Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left (commute_X_pow _ _).symm ?_
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨m, ?_⟩
rw [← C_pow, hm, C_0]
lemma isNilpotent_pow_X_mul_C_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent (X ^ n * (C r)) := by
rw [commute_X_pow]
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent n hnil
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_monomial_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsNilpotent (monomial (R := R) n r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simp
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_C_iff :
IsNilpotent (C r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simpa only [← C_pow] using C_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_X_mul_iff :
IsNilpotent (X * P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right_iff (commute_X P) (by simp)] at h
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨k, by simp [(commute_X P).mul_pow, hk]⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_mul_X_iff :
IsNilpotent (P * X) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
rw [← commute_X P]
exact isNilpotent_X_mul_iff
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {P : R[X]}
protected lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent P ↔ ∀ i, IsNilpotent (coeff P i) := by
refine
⟨P.recOnHorner (by simp) (fun p r hp₀ _ hp hpr i ↦ ?_) (fun p _ hnp hpX i ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sum_monomial_eq P]
exact isNilpotent_sum (fun i _ ↦ by simpa only [isNilpotent_monomial_iff] using h i)
· have hr : IsNilpotent (C r) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hpr
replace hp : eval 0 p = 0 := by rwa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero] at hp₀
refine isNilpotent_C_iff.mpr ⟨k, ?_⟩
simpa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero, hp] using congr_arg (fun q ↦ coeff q 0) hk
rcases i with - | i
· simpa [hp₀] using hr
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
apply hp
simpa using Commute.isNilpotent_sub (Commute.all _ _) hpr hr
· rcases i with - | i
· simp
simpa using hnp (isNilpotent_mul_X_iff.mp hpX) i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reflect_iff {P : R[X]} {N : ℕ} (hN : P.natDegree ≤ N) :
IsNilpotent (reflect N P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
simp only [Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff, coeff_reverse]
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h i ↦ ?_⟩ <;> rcases le_or_lt i N with hi | hi
· simpa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hi] using h (N - i)
· simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt hN hi]
· simpa [hi, revAt_le] using h (N - i)
· simpa [revAt_eq_self_of_lt hi] using h i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reverse_iff :
IsNilpotent P.reverse ↔ IsNilpotent P :=
isNilpotent_reflect_iff (le_refl _)
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If its constant term is a unit and its other coefficients are
nilpotent, then `P` is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
| theorem isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (hunit : IsUnit (P.coeff 0))
(hnil : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) : IsUnit P := by
induction' h : P.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with k hind generalizing P
by_cases hdeg : P.natDegree = 0
{ rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hdeg]
exact hunit.map C }
set P₁ := P.eraseLead with hP₁
suffices IsUnit P₁ by
rw [← eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff P, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← hP₁]
refine IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_left_of_commute ?_ this (Commute.all _ _)
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent _ (hnil _ hdeg)
have hdeg₂ := lt_of_le_of_lt P.eraseLead_natDegree_le (Nat.sub_lt
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hdeg) zero_lt_one)
refine hind P₁.natDegree ?_ ?_ (fun i hi => ?_) rfl
· simp_rw [P₁, ← h, hdeg₂]
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (Ne.symm hdeg), hunit]
· by_cases H : i ≤ P₁.natDegree
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H hdeg₂)), hnil i hi]
· simp_rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge H), IsNilpotent.zero]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Nilpotent.lean | 108 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
/-!
# Minimality and Maximality
This file proves basic facts about minimality and maximality
of an element with respect to a predicate `P` on an ordered type `α`.
## Implementation Details
This file underwent a refactor from a version where minimality and maximality were defined using
sets rather than predicates, and with an unbundled order relation rather than a `LE` instance.
A side effect is that it has become less straightforward to state that something is minimal
with respect to a relation that is *not* defeq to the default `LE`.
One possible way would be with a type synonym,
and another would be with an ad hoc `LE` instance and `@` notation.
This was not an issue in practice anywhere in mathlib at the time of the refactor,
but it may be worth re-examining this to make it easier in the future; see the TODO below.
## TODO
* In the linearly ordered case, versions of lemmas like `minimal_mem_image` will hold with
`MonotoneOn`/`AntitoneOn` assumptions rather than the stronger `x ≤ y ↔ f x ≤ f y` assumptions.
* `Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert` and `Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton` will generalize to
lemmas about covering in the case of an `IsStronglyAtomic`/`IsStronglyCoatomic` order.
* `Finset` versions of the lemmas about sets.
* API to allow for easily expressing min/maximality with respect to an arbitrary non-`LE` relation.
* API for `MinimalFor`/`MaximalFor`
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Set OrderDual
variable {α : Type*} {P Q : α → Prop} {a x y : α}
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[simp] theorem minimal_toDual : Minimal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Maximal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Minimal.of_dual, Minimal.dual⟩ := minimal_toDual
@[simp] theorem maximal_toDual : Maximal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Minimal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Maximal.of_dual, Maximal.dual⟩ := maximal_toDual
@[simp] theorem minimal_false : ¬ Minimal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_false : ¬ Maximal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Maximal]
@[simp] theorem minimal_true : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMin x := by
simp [IsMin, Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_true : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMax x :=
minimal_true (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Minimal (P ⊓ Q) x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp only [Minimal, Subtype.forall, Subtype.mk_le_mk, Pi.inf_apply, inf_Prop_eq]
tauto
@[simp] theorem maximal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Maximal (P ⊓ Q) x :=
minimal_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem maximal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Maximal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Maximal, hx]
theorem minimal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Minimal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Minimal, hx]
@[simp] theorem minimal_minimal : Minimal (Minimal P) x ↔ Minimal P x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.prop, fun h ↦ ⟨h, fun _ hy hyx ↦ h.le_of_le hy.prop hyx⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem maximal_maximal : Maximal (Maximal P) x ↔ Maximal P x :=
minimal_minimal (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If `P` is down-closed, then minimal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally minimal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem minimal_iff_isMin (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → x ≤ y → P x) : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMin x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_le (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
/-- If `P` is up-closed, then maximal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally maximal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem maximal_iff_isMax (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → y ≤ x → P x) : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMax x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_ge (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
theorem Minimal.mono (h : Minimal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_le (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Maximal.mono (h : Maximal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_ge (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Minimal.and_right (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Minimal.and_left (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
theorem Maximal.and_right (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (P x ∧ Q x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Maximal.and_left (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
@[simp] theorem minimal_eq_iff : Minimal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_eq_iff : Maximal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Maximal]
theorem not_minimal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Minimal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ y ≤ x ∧ ¬ (x ≤ y) := by
simp [Minimal, hx]
theorem not_maximal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Maximal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ x ≤ y ∧ ¬ (y ≤ x) :=
not_minimal_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) hx
theorem Minimal.or (h : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Minimal P x ∨ Minimal Q x := by
obtain ⟨h | h, hmin⟩ := h
· exact .inl ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inl hy) hyx⟩
exact .inr ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inr hy) hyx⟩
theorem Maximal.or (h : Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Maximal P x ∨ Maximal Q x :=
Minimal.or (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Minimal P x) ∧ Q x := by
simp_rw [and_iff_left_of_imp (fun x ↦ hPQ x), iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ hPQ h.prop
theorem minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Minimal P x) := by
simp_rw [iff_comm, and_comm, minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp hPQ, and_comm]
theorem maximal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Maximal P x) ∧ Q x :=
minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
theorem maximal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Maximal P x) :=
minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem minimal_iff_forall_lt : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y < x → ¬ P y := by
simp [Minimal, lt_iff_le_not_le, not_imp_not, imp.swap]
theorem maximal_iff_forall_gt : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, x < y → ¬ P y :=
minimal_iff_forall_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Minimal.not_prop_of_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hlt : y < x) : ¬ P y :=
(minimal_iff_forall_lt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Maximal.not_prop_of_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hlt : x < y) : ¬ P y :=
(maximal_iff_forall_gt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Minimal.not_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (y < x) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_lt hlt hy
theorem Maximal.not_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (x < y) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_gt hlt hy
@[simp] theorem minimal_le_iff : Minimal (· ≤ y) x ↔ x ≤ y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans h)
@[simp] theorem maximal_ge_iff : Maximal (y ≤ ·) x ↔ y ≤ x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_le_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_lt_iff : Minimal (· < y) x ↔ x < y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans_lt h)
@[simp] theorem maximal_gt_iff : Maximal (y < ·) x ↔ y < x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_lt_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem not_minimal_iff_exists_lt (hx : P x) : ¬ Minimal P x ↔ ∃ y, y < x ∧ P y := by
simp_rw [not_minimal_iff hx, lt_iff_le_not_le, and_comm]
alias ⟨exists_lt_of_not_minimal, _⟩ := not_minimal_iff_exists_lt
theorem not_maximal_iff_exists_gt (hx : P x) : ¬ Maximal P x ↔ ∃ y, x < y ∧ P y :=
not_minimal_iff_exists_lt (α := αᵒᵈ) hx
alias ⟨exists_gt_of_not_maximal, _⟩ := not_maximal_iff_exists_gt
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem Minimal.eq_of_ge (hx : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) (hge : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
(hx.2 hy hge).antisymm hge
theorem Minimal.eq_of_le (hx : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) (hle : y ≤ x) : y = x :=
(hx.eq_of_ge hy hle).symm
theorem Maximal.eq_of_le (hx : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) (hle : x ≤ y) : x = y :=
hle.antisymm <| hx.2 hy hle
theorem Maximal.eq_of_ge (hx : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) (hge : x ≤ y) : y = x :=
(hx.eq_of_le hy hge).symm
theorem minimal_iff : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, P y → y ≤ x → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_ge⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ hy hle ↦ (h.2 hy hle).le⟩⟩
theorem maximal_iff : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, P y → x ≤ y → x = y :=
minimal_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem minimal_mem_iff {s : Set α} : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → y ≤ x → x = y :=
minimal_iff
theorem maximal_mem_iff {s : Set α} : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≤ y → x = y :=
maximal_iff
/-- If `P y` holds, and everything satisfying `P` is above `y`, then `y` is the unique minimal
element satisfying `P`. -/
theorem minimal_iff_eq (hy : P y) (hP : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → y ≤ x) : Minimal P x ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.eq_of_ge hy (hP h.prop), by rintro rfl; exact ⟨hy, fun z hz _ ↦ hP hz⟩⟩
/-- If `P y` holds, and everything satisfying `P` is below `y`, then `y` is the unique maximal
element satisfying `P`. -/
theorem maximal_iff_eq (hy : P y) (hP : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → x ≤ y) : Maximal P x ↔ x = y :=
minimal_iff_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hy hP
@[simp] theorem minimal_ge_iff : Minimal (y ≤ ·) x ↔ x = y :=
minimal_iff_eq rfl.le fun _ ↦ id
@[simp] theorem maximal_le_iff : Maximal (· ≤ y) x ↔ x = y :=
maximal_iff_eq rfl.le fun _ ↦ id
theorem minimal_iff_minimal_of_imp_of_forall (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, Q x → P x)
(h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → ∃ y, y ≤ x ∧ Q y) : Minimal P x ↔ Minimal Q x := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ⟨?_, fun y hy hyx ↦ h'.le_of_le (hPQ hy) hyx⟩,
fun h' ↦ ⟨hPQ h'.prop, fun y hy hyx ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ := h h'.prop
rwa [((h'.le_of_le (hPQ hy)) hyx).antisymm hyx]
obtain ⟨z, hzy, hz⟩ := h hy
exact (h'.le_of_le hz (hzy.trans hyx)).trans hzy
theorem maximal_iff_maximal_of_imp_of_forall (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, Q x → P x)
(h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → ∃ y, x ≤ y ∧ Q y) : Maximal P x ↔ Maximal Q x :=
minimal_iff_minimal_of_imp_of_forall (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ h
end PartialOrder
section Subset
variable {P : Set α → Prop} {s t : Set α}
theorem Minimal.eq_of_superset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) (hts : t ⊆ s) : s = t :=
h.eq_of_ge ht hts
theorem Maximal.eq_of_subset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s = t :=
h.eq_of_le ht hst
theorem Minimal.eq_of_subset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) (hts : t ⊆ s) : t = s :=
h.eq_of_le ht hts
theorem Maximal.eq_of_superset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : t = s :=
h.eq_of_ge ht hst
theorem minimal_subset_iff : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → s = t :=
_root_.minimal_iff
theorem maximal_subset_iff : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → s = t :=
_root_.maximal_iff
theorem minimal_subset_iff' : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem maximal_subset_iff' : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_minimal_subset_iff (hs : P s) : ¬ Minimal P s ↔ ∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ P t :=
not_minimal_iff_exists_lt hs
theorem not_maximal_subset_iff (hs : P s) : ¬ Maximal P s ↔ ∃ t, s ⊂ t ∧ P t :=
not_maximal_iff_exists_gt hs
theorem Set.minimal_iff_forall_ssubset : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊂ s → ¬ P t :=
minimal_iff_forall_lt
theorem Minimal.not_prop_of_ssubset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : t ⊂ s) : ¬ P t :=
(minimal_iff_forall_lt.1 h).2 ht
theorem Minimal.not_ssubset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) : ¬ t ⊂ s :=
h.not_lt ht
theorem Maximal.mem_of_prop_insert (h : Maximal P s) (hx : P (insert x s)) : x ∈ s :=
h.eq_of_subset hx (subset_insert _ _) ▸ mem_insert ..
theorem Minimal.not_mem_of_prop_diff_singleton (h : Minimal P s) (hx : P (s \ {x})) : x ∉ s :=
fun hxs ↦ ((h.eq_of_superset hx diff_subset).subset hxs).2 rfl
theorem Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → P s) :
Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ P (s \ {x}) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ hx hP ↦ h.not_mem_of_prop_diff_singleton hP hx⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ ht hts x hxs ↦ by_contra fun hxt ↦
h.2 x hxs (hP ht <| subset_diff_singleton hts hxt)⟩⟩
theorem Set.exists_diff_singleton_of_not_minimal (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → P s) (hs : P s)
(h : ¬ Minimal P s) : ∃ x ∈ s, P (s \ {x}) := by
simpa [Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton hP, hs] using h
theorem Set.maximal_iff_forall_ssuperset : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, s ⊂ t → ¬ P t :=
maximal_iff_forall_gt
theorem Maximal.not_prop_of_ssuperset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : s ⊂ t) : ¬ P t :=
(maximal_iff_forall_gt.1 h).2 ht
theorem Maximal.not_ssuperset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) : ¬ s ⊂ t :=
h.not_gt ht
theorem Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → P s) :
Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ x ∉ s, ¬ P (insert x s) := by
simp only [not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun x ↦ h.mem_of_prop_insert⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun t ht hst x hxt ↦ h.2 x (hP ht <| insert_subset hxt hst)⟩⟩
theorem Set.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → P s) (hs : P s)
(h : ¬ Maximal P s) : ∃ x ∉ s, P (insert x s) := by
simpa [Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert hP, hs] using h
/- TODO : generalize `minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton` and `maximal_iff_forall_insert`
to `IsStronglyCoatomic`/`IsStronglyAtomic` orders. -/
end Subset
section Set
variable {s t : Set α}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem setOf_minimal_subset (s : Set α) : {x | Minimal (· ∈ s) x} ⊆ s :=
sep_subset ..
theorem setOf_maximal_subset (s : Set α) : {x | Maximal (· ∈ s) x} ⊆ s :=
sep_subset ..
theorem Set.Subsingleton.maximal_mem_iff (h : s.Subsingleton) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s := by
obtain (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) := h.eq_empty_or_singleton <;> simp
theorem Set.Subsingleton.minimal_mem_iff (h : s.Subsingleton) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s := by
obtain (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) := h.eq_empty_or_singleton <;> simp
theorem IsLeast.minimal (h : IsLeast s x) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x :=
⟨h.1, fun _b hb _ ↦ h.2 hb⟩
theorem IsGreatest.maximal (h : IsGreatest s x) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x :=
⟨h.1, fun _b hb _ ↦ h.2 hb⟩
theorem IsAntichain.minimal_mem_iff (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) s) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.prop, fun h ↦ ⟨h, fun _ hys hyx ↦ (hs.eq hys h hyx).symm.le⟩⟩
theorem IsAntichain.maximal_mem_iff (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) s) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s :=
hs.to_dual.minimal_mem_iff
/-- If `t` is an antichain shadowing and including the set of maximal elements of `s`,
then `t` *is* the set of maximal elements of `s`. -/
theorem IsAntichain.eq_setOf_maximal (ht : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) t)
(h : ∀ x, Maximal (· ∈ s) x → x ∈ t) (hs : ∀ a ∈ t, ∃ b, b ≤ a ∧ Maximal (· ∈ s) b) :
{x | Maximal (· ∈ s) x} = t := by
refine Set.ext fun x ↦ ⟨h _, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ := hs x hx
rwa [← ht.eq (h y hy) hx hyx]
/-- If `t` is an antichain shadowed by and including the set of minimal elements of `s`,
then `t` *is* the set of minimal elements of `s`. -/
theorem IsAntichain.eq_setOf_minimal (ht : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) t)
(h : ∀ x, Minimal (· ∈ s) x → x ∈ t) (hs : ∀ a ∈ t, ∃ b, a ≤ b ∧ Minimal (· ∈ s) b) :
{x | Minimal (· ∈ s) x} = t :=
ht.to_dual.eq_setOf_maximal h hs
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem setOf_maximal_antichain (P : α → Prop) : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) {x | Maximal P x} :=
fun _ hx _ ⟨hy, _⟩ hne hle ↦ hne (hle.antisymm <| hx.2 hy hle)
theorem setOf_minimal_antichain (P : α → Prop) : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) {x | Minimal P x} :=
(setOf_maximal_antichain (α := αᵒᵈ) P).swap
theorem IsLeast.minimal_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.eq_of_ge h.1 (h.2 h'.prop), fun h' ↦ h' ▸ h.minimal⟩
theorem IsGreatest.maximal_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.eq_of_le h.1 (h.2 h'.prop), fun h' ↦ h' ▸ h.maximal⟩
end PartialOrder
end Set
section Image
variable [Preorder α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
section Function
variable {f : α → β}
theorem minimal_mem_image_monotone (hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y))
(hx : Minimal (· ∈ s) x) : Minimal (· ∈ f '' s) (f x) := by
refine ⟨mem_image_of_mem f hx.prop, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [hf hx.prop hy, hf hy hx.prop]
exact hx.le_of_le hy
theorem maximal_mem_image_monotone (hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y))
(hx : Maximal (· ∈ s) x) : Maximal (· ∈ f '' s) (f x) :=
minimal_mem_image_monotone (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (s := s) (fun _ _ hx hy ↦ hf hy hx) hx
theorem minimal_mem_image_monotone_iff (ha : a ∈ s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y)) :
Minimal (· ∈ f '' s) (f a) ↔ Minimal (· ∈ s) a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨ha, fun y hys ↦ ?_⟩, minimal_mem_image_monotone hf⟩
rw [← hf ha hys, ← hf hys ha]
exact h.le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem f hys)
theorem maximal_mem_image_monotone_iff (ha : a ∈ s)
| (hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y)) :
Maximal (· ∈ f '' s) (f a) ↔ Maximal (· ∈ s) a :=
minimal_mem_image_monotone_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (s := s) ha fun _ _ hx hy ↦ hf hy hx
| Mathlib/Order/Minimal.lean | 446 | 448 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem exists₂_comm
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∃ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∃ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@exists_comm (κ₁ _), @exists_comm ι₁]
theorem And.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨h, H⟩ ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq, H⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} (h : b ∨ ∀ x, p x) (x : α) :
b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right fun h₂ ↦ h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ if hq : q then Or.inl hq else
Or.inr fun x ↦ (h x).resolve_left hq, forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_left {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q := by simp [or_comm, Decidable.forall_or_left]
theorem forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_right
theorem Exists.fst {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem Exists.snd {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Prop.exists_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∃ h, p h) ↔ p False ∨ p True :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by_cases (fun H : h₁ ↦ .inr <| by simpa only [H] using h₂)
(fun H ↦ .inl <| by simpa only [H] using h₂), fun h ↦ h.elim (.intro _) (.intro _)⟩
theorem Prop.forall_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∀ h, p h) ↔ p False ∧ p True :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h ↦ by by_cases H : h <;> simpa only [H]⟩
theorem exists_iff_of_forall {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : ∀ h, q h) : (∃ h, q h) ↔ p :=
⟨Exists.fst, fun H ↦ ⟨H, h H⟩⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬p → ¬∃ h' : p, q h' :=
mt Exists.fst
/- See `IsEmpty.exists_iff` for the `False` version of `exists_true_left`. -/
theorem forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 h2)), fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
theorem forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq hp)
lemma imp_congr_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr h₁.to_iff h₂.to_iff)
lemma imp_congr_ctx_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx h₁.to_iff fun hc ↦ (h₂ hc).to_iff)
lemma eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True := propext (iff_true_intro h)
lemma eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False := propext (iff_false_intro h)
-- FIXME: `alias` creates `def Iff.eq := propext` instead of `lemma Iff.eq := propext`
@[nolint defLemma] alias Iff.eq := propext
lemma iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) := propext ⟨propext, Eq.to_iff⟩
-- They were not used in Lean 3 and there are already lemmas with those names in Lean 4
/-- See `IsEmpty.forall_iff` for the `False` version. -/
@[simp] theorem forall_true_left (p : True → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p True.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
end Quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace Classical
-- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open.
/-- Any prop `p` is decidable classically. A shorthand for `Classical.propDecidable`. -/
noncomputable def dec (p : Prop) : Decidable p := by infer_instance
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Any predicate `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decPred (p : α → Prop) : DecidablePred p := by infer_instance
/-- Any relation `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decRel (p : α → α → Prop) : DecidableRel p := by infer_instance
/-- Any type `α` has decidable equality classically. -/
noncomputable def decEq (α : Sort*) : DecidableEq α := by infer_instance
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
noncomputable def existsCases {α C : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h) else H0
theorem some_spec₂ {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃ a, p a} (q : α → Prop)
(hpq : ∀ a, p a → q a) : q (choose h) := hpq _ <| choose_spec _
/-- A version of `byContradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬(α → False)) : α :=
Classical.choice <| (peirce _ False) fun h ↦ (H fun a ↦ h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `Classical.byContradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `Classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬(α → False) → α) : Nonempty α → α :=
fun H ↦ contra H.elim
@[simp] lemma choose_eq (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (· = a) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a := @choose_spec _ (· = a) _
@[simp]
lemma choose_eq' (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (a = ·) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a :=
(@choose_spec _ (a = ·) _).symm
alias axiom_of_choice := axiomOfChoice -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_cases := byCases -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_contradiction := byContradiction -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
-- The remaining theorems in this section were ported from Lean 3,
-- but are currently unused in Mathlib, so have been deprecated.
-- If any are being used downstream, please remove the deprecation.
alias prop_complete := propComplete -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
end Classical
/-- This function has the same type as `Exists.recOn`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `Exists.recOn` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
noncomputable def Exists.classicalRecOn {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a)
{C : Sort*} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section BoundedQuantifiers
variable {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem BEx.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h' => h' a h₁ h₂
theorem BEx.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ (x : _) (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem BAll.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) (h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ <| h₁ _ _
|
theorem BEx.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) : (∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 761 | 762 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Cyclotomic extensions
Let `A` and `B` be commutative rings with `Algebra A B`. For `S : Set ℕ+`, we define a class
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` expressing the fact that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th
primitive roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` : means that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th primitive
roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
* `CyclotomicField`: given `n : ℕ+` and a field `K`, we define `CyclotomicField n K` as the
splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`. If `n` is nonzero in `K`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K (CyclotomicField n K)`.
* `CyclotomicRing` : if `A` is a domain with fraction field `K` and `n : ℕ+`, we define
`CyclotomicRing n A K` as the `A`-subalgebra of `CyclotomicField n K` generated by the roots of
`X ^ n - 1`. If `n` is nonzero in `A`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A (CyclotomicRing n A K)`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` and
`IsCyclotomicExtension T B C`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C` if
`Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }) B`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension T A B` and `S ⊆ T`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 })`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.finite` : if `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then
`B` is a finite `A`-algebra.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField` : a finite cyclotomic extension of a number field is a
number field.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.isSplittingField_X_pow_sub_one` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `X ^ n - 1`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.splitting_field_cyclotomic` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `IsCyclotomicExtension` is very general, to allow rings of any characteristic
and infinite extensions, but it will mainly be used in the case `S = {n}` and for integral domains.
All results are in the `IsCyclotomicExtension` namespace.
Note that some results, for example `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finite`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.isGalois` and
`CyclotomicField.algebraBase` are lemmas, but they can be made local instances. Some of them are
included in the `Cyclotomic` locale.
-/
open Polynomial Algebra Module Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
/-- Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `S : Set ℕ+`, we define `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` requiring
that there is an `n`-th primitive root of unity in `B` for all `n ∈ S` and that `B` is generated
over `A` by the roots of `X ^ n - 1`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
/-- For all `n ∈ S`, there exists a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `B`. -/
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
/-- The `n`-th roots of unity, for `n ∈ S`, generate `B` as an `A`-algebra. -/
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` that uses `⊤`. -/
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` in the case `S` is a singleton. -/
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`. -/
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
variable (A B)
/-- Transitivity of cyclotomic extensions. -/
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· rcases hn with hn | hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (hx := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy)
fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← map_pow, hn.2, map_one]⟩⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `S ∪ T`, then `B`
is a cyclotomic extension of `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` given by
roots of unity of order in `T`. -/
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `T` and `S ⊆ T`,
then `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` is a cyclotomic extension of `B`
given by roots of unity of order in `S`. -/
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
variable {n S}
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` implies
| `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 194 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
| have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 543 | 547 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
/-!
# Perpendicular bisector of a segment
We define `AffineSubspace.perpBisector p₁ p₂` to be the perpendicular bisector of the segment
`[p₁, p₂]`, as a bundled affine subspace. We also prove that a point belongs to the perpendicular
bisector if and only if it is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, as well as a few linear equations that
define this subspace.
## Keywords
euclidean geometry, perpendicular, perpendicular bisector, line segment bisector, equidistant
-/
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- Perpendicular bisector of a segment in a Euclidean affine space. -/
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) (LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)))
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `p₂ -ᵥ p₁` is orthogonal to
`c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂` is
orthogonal to `p₂ -ᵥ p₁`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem midpoint_mem_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ := by
simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero]
theorem perpBisector_nonempty : (perpBisector p₁ p₂ : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨_, midpoint_mem_perpBisector _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem direction_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
(perpBisector p₁ p₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))ᗮ := by
rw [perpBisector, direction_mk']
ext x
exact Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [Iff.comm, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← add_neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ← inner_add_left, vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add,
| real_inner_smul_left]; simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = (dist p₁ p₂) ^ 2 / 2 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right _ _ p₁, inner_sub_left,
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 80 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.TakeWhile
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Sorting algorithms on lists
In this file we define `List.Sorted r l` to be an alias for `List.Pairwise r l`.
This alias is preferred in the case that `r` is a `<` or `≤`-like relation.
Then we define the sorting algorithm
`List.insertionSort` and prove its correctness.
-/
open List.Perm
universe u v
namespace List
/-!
### The predicate `List.Sorted`
-/
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
/-- `Sorted r l` is the same as `List.Pairwise r l`, preferred in the case that `r`
is a `<` or `≤`-like relation (transitive and antisymmetric or asymmetric) -/
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
nonrec theorem Sorted.cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α}
(hab : r a b) (h : Sorted r (b :: l)) : Sorted r (a :: b :: l) :=
h.cons <| forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hab, fun _ hx => _root_.trans hab <| rel_of_sorted_cons h _ hx⟩
theorem sorted_cons_cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α} :
Sorted r (b :: a :: l) ↔ r b a ∧ Sorted r (a :: l) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨rel_of_sorted_cons h _ mem_cons_self, h.of_cons⟩
· rintro ⟨h, ha⟩
exact ha.cons h
theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
theorem Sorted.le_head! [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· > ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : a ≤ l.head! := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
@[simp]
theorem sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, r a b) ∧ Sorted r l :=
pairwise_cons
protected theorem Sorted.nodup {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) :
Nodup l :=
Pairwise.nodup h
protected theorem Sorted.filter {l : List α} (f : α → Bool) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted r (filter f l) :=
h.sublist filter_sublist
theorem eq_of_perm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) (hs₁ : Sorted r l₁)
(hs₂ : Sorted r l₂) : l₁ = l₂ := by
induction hs₁ generalizing l₂ with
| nil => exact hp.nil_eq
| @cons a l₁ h₁ hs₁ IH =>
have : a ∈ l₂ := hp.subset mem_cons_self
rcases append_of_mem this with ⟨u₂, v₂, rfl⟩
have hp' := (perm_cons a).1 (hp.trans perm_middle)
obtain rfl := IH hp' (hs₂.sublist <| by simp)
change a :: u₂ ++ v₂ = u₂ ++ ([a] ++ v₂)
rw [← append_assoc]
congr
have : ∀ x ∈ u₂, x = a := fun x m =>
antisymm ((pairwise_append.1 hs₂).2.2 _ m a mem_cons_self) (h₁ _ (by simp [m]))
rw [(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (a :: u₂)).2,
(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (u₂ ++ [a])).2] <;>
constructor <;>
simp [iff_true_intro this, or_comm]
theorem Sorted.eq_of_mem_iff [IsAntisymm α r] [IsIrrefl α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α}
(h₁ : Sorted r l₁) (h₂ : Sorted r l₂) (h : ∀ a : α, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((perm_ext_iff_of_nodup h₁.nodup h₂.nodup).2 h) h₁ h₂
theorem sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ <+~ l₂)
(hs₁ : l₁.Sorted r) (hs₂ : l₂.Sorted r) : l₁ <+ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, h, h'⟩ := hp
rwa [← eq_of_perm_of_sorted h (hs₂.sublist h') hs₁]
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut lemma.
theorem sorted_singleton (a : α) : Sorted r [a] := by
simp
theorem sorted_lt_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· < ·) (range n) := by
rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get]
simp
theorem sorted_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Sorted r (replicate n a) ↔ n ≤ 1 ∨ r a a :=
pairwise_replicate
theorem sorted_le_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) [Preorder α] : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (replicate n a) := by
simp [sorted_replicate]
theorem sorted_le_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
(sorted_lt_range n).le_of_lt
lemma sorted_lt_range' (a b) {s} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
Sorted (· < ·) (range' a b s) := by
induction b generalizing a with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [List.range'_succ]
refine List.sorted_cons.mpr ⟨fun b hb ↦ ?_, @ih (a + s)⟩
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hs))
(List.left_le_of_mem_range' hb)
lemma sorted_le_range' (a b s) :
Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range' a b s) := by
by_cases hs : s ≠ 0
· exact (sorted_lt_range' a b hs).le_of_lt
· rw [ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] at hs
simpa [hs] using sorted_le_replicate b a
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_lt {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length} (hab : a < b) :
r (l.get a) (l.get b) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.1 h _ _ hab
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_le [IsRefl α r] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length}
(hab : a ≤ b) : r (l.get a) (l.get b) := by
obtain rfl | hlt := Fin.eq_or_lt_of_le hab; exacts [refl _, h.rel_get_of_lt hlt]
theorem Sorted.rel_of_mem_take_of_mem_drop {l : List α} (h : List.Sorted r l) {k : ℕ} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ List.take k l) (hy : y ∈ List.drop k l) : r x y := by
obtain ⟨iy, hiy, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hy
obtain ⟨ix, hix, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [getElem_take, getElem_drop]
rw [length_take] at hix
exact h.rel_get_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_right _ (Nat.lt_min.mp hix).left)
/--
If a list is sorted with respect to a decidable relation,
then it is sorted with respect to the corresponding Bool-valued relation.
-/
theorem Sorted.decide [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted (fun a b => decide (r a b) = true) l := by
refine h.imp fun {a b} h => by simpa using h
end Sorted
section Monotone
variable {n : ℕ} {α : Type u} {f : Fin n → α}
open scoped Relator in
theorem sorted_ofFn_iff {r : α → α → Prop} : (ofFn f).Sorted r ↔ ((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f := by
simp_rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get, get_ofFn, Relator.LiftFun]
exact Iff.symm (Fin.rightInverse_cast _).surjective.forall₂
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_lt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ StrictMono f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_gt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ StrictAnti f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_le_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ Monotone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans monotone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from a monotone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Monotone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_le_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_ge_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ Antitone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans antitone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from an antitone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Antitone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_ge_ofFn_iff
end Monotone
lemma Sorted.filterMap {α β : Type*} {p : α → Option β} {l : List α}
{r : α → α → Prop} {r' : β → β → Prop} (hl : l.Sorted r)
(hp : ∀ (a b : α) (c d : β), p a = some c → p b = some d → r a b → r' c d) :
(l.filterMap p).Sorted r' := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [List.filterMap_cons]
cases ha : p a with
| none =>
exact ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right
| some b =>
rw [List.sorted_cons]
refine ⟨fun x hx ↦ ?_, ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := List.mem_filterMap.mp hx
exact hp a u b x ha hu' <| (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).left u hu
end List
open List
namespace RelEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem sorted_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} : (l.map e).Sorted rb ↔ l.Sorted ra := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_swap_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (Function.swap rb) ↔ l.Sorted (Function.swap ra) := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
end RelEmbedding
namespace OrderEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_swap_listMap
end OrderEmbedding
namespace RelIso
variable {α β : Type*} {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem sorted_listMap (e : ra ≃r rb) {l : List α} : (l.map e).Sorted rb ↔ l.Sorted ra :=
e.toRelEmbedding.sorted_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_swap_listMap (e : ra ≃r rb) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (Function.swap rb) ↔ l.Sorted (Function.swap ra) :=
e.toRelEmbedding.sorted_swap_listMap
end RelIso
namespace OrderIso
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (e : α ≃o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.sorted_lt_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (e : α ≃o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.sorted_gt_listMap
end OrderIso
namespace StrictMono
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α}
theorem sorted_le_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_listMap
theorem sorted_ge_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_swap_listMap
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_lt_listMap
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
| (l.map f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_gt_listMap
end StrictMono
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 333 | 336 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Embedding
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Supported
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Lemmas about the support of a finitely supported function
-/
open scoped Pointwise
universe u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace MonoidAlgebra
open Finset Finsupp
variable {k : Type u₁} {G : Type u₂} [Semiring k]
theorem support_mul [Mul G] [DecidableEq G] (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
(a * b).support ⊆ a.support * b.support := by
rw [MonoidAlgebra.mul_def]
exact support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _x hx ↦
support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _y hy ↦
support_single_subset.trans <| singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_image₂_of_mem hx hy
theorem support_single_mul_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(single a r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support ⊆ Finset.image (a * ·) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_right support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_left]
theorem support_mul_single_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(f * single a r).support ⊆ Finset.image (· * a) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_left support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_right]
theorem support_single_mul_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (lx : IsLeftRegular x) :
(single x r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = Finset.image (x * ·) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_single_mul_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ x * a = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, zero_mul, ite_self, sum_zero, lx.eq_iff]
theorem support_mul_single_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (rx : IsRightRegular x) :
(f * single x r).support = Finset.image (· * x) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_mul_single_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ a * x = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, mul_zero, ite_self, sum_zero, rx.eq_iff]
theorem support_mul_single [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(f * single x r).support = f.support.map (mulRightEmbedding x) := by
classical
ext
simp only [support_mul_single_eq_image f hr (IsRightRegular.all x),
mem_image, mem_map, mulRightEmbedding_apply]
theorem support_single_mul [Mul G] [IsLeftCancelMul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(single x r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = f.support.map (mulLeftEmbedding x) := by
classical
ext
simp only [support_single_mul_eq_image f hr (IsLeftRegular.all x), mem_image,
mem_map, mulLeftEmbedding_apply]
lemma support_one_subset [One G] : (1 : MonoidAlgebra k G).support ⊆ 1 :=
Finsupp.support_single_subset
@[simp]
lemma support_one [One G] [NeZero (1 : k)] : (1 : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = 1 :=
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ one_ne_zero
section Span
variable [MulOneClass G]
/-- An element of `MonoidAlgebra k G` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_span_support (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
f ∈ Submodule.span k (of k G '' (f.support : Set G)) := by
erw [of, MonoidHom.coe_mk, ← supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported]
end Span
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
open Finset Finsupp MulOpposite
variable {k : Type u₁} {G : Type u₂} [Semiring k]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq G] [Add G] (a b : k[G]) :
(a * b).support ⊆ a.support + b.support :=
@MonoidAlgebra.support_mul k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _
theorem support_mul_single [Add G] [IsRightCancelAdd G] (f : k[G]) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(f * single x r : k[G]).support = f.support.map (addRightEmbedding x) :=
MonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single (G := Multiplicative G) _ _ hr _
theorem support_single_mul [Add G] [IsLeftCancelAdd G] (f : k[G]) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(single x r * f : k[G]).support = f.support.map (addLeftEmbedding x) :=
MonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul (G := Multiplicative G) _ _ hr _
lemma support_one_subset [Zero G] : (1 : k[G]).support ⊆ 0 := Finsupp.support_single_subset
@[simp]
lemma support_one [Zero G] [NeZero (1 : k)] : (1 : k[G]).support = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ one_ne_zero
section Span
/-- An element of `k[G]` is in the submodule generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_span_support [AddZeroClass G] (f : k[G]) :
f ∈ Submodule.span k (of k G '' (f.support : Set G)) := by
erw [of, MonoidHom.coe_mk, ← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported]
/-- An element of `k[G]` is in the subalgebra generated by its support, using
unbundled inclusion. -/
theorem mem_span_support' (f : k[G]) :
f ∈ Submodule.span k (of' k G '' (f.support : Set G)) := by
delta of'
rw [← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported]
end Span
end AddMonoidAlgebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Support.lean | 143 | 146 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ choice) using Lean's underlying type theory,
building on the pre-sets defined in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet`.
The theory of classes is developed in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Class`.
## Main definitions
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
* `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `Set`.
* `Classical.allZFSetDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
-/
universe u
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
namespace ZFSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary `PSet`
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class Definable (n) (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) where
/-- Turns a definable function into an n-ary `PSet` function. -/
out : (Fin n → PSet.{u}) → PSet.{u}
/-- A set function `f` is the image of `Definable.out f`. -/
mk_out xs : mk (out xs) = f (mk <| xs ·) := by simp
attribute [simp] Definable.mk_out
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for unary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₁ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 1 (fun s ↦ f (s 0))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₁`. -/
abbrev Definable₁.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x, ⟦out x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧) :
Definable₁ f where
out xs := out (xs 0)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0)
/-- Turns a unary definable function into a unary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₁.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0)) ![x]
lemma Definable₁.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f]
{x : PSet} :
.mk (out f x) = f (.mk x) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x]
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for binary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₂ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 2 (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₂`. -/
abbrev Definable₂.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x y, ⟦out x y⟧ = f ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧) :
Definable₂ f where
out xs := out (xs 0) (xs 1)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0) (xs 1)
/-- Turns a binary definable function into a binary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₂.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x y ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1)) ![x, y]
lemma Definable₂.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₂ f]
{x y : PSet} :
.mk (out f x y) = f (.mk x) (.mk y) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x, y]
instance (f) [Definable₁ f] (n g) [Definable n g] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g s)) where
out xs := Definable₁.out f (Definable.out g xs)
instance (f) [Definable₂ f] (n g₁ g₂) [Definable n g₁] [Definable n g₂] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g₁ s) (g₂ s)) where
out xs := Definable₂.out f (Definable.out g₁ xs) (Definable.out g₂ xs)
instance (n) (i) : Definable n (fun s ↦ s i) where
out s := s i
lemma Definable.out_equiv {n} (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable n f]
{xs ys : Fin n → PSet} (h : ∀ i, xs i ≈ ys i) :
out f xs ≈ out f ys := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_iff_equiv, mk_eq, mk_eq, mk_out, mk_out]
exact congrArg _ (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.sound (h i))
lemma Definable₁.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f]
{x y : PSet} (h : x ≈ y) :
out f x ≈ out f y :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [h])
lemma Definable₂.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f]
{x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PSet} (h₁ : x₁ ≈ y₁) (h₂ : x₂ ≈ y₂) :
out f x₁ x₂ ≈ out f y₁ y₂ :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [Fin.forall_fin_succ, h₁, h₂])
end ZFSet
namespace Classical
open PSet ZFSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allZFSetDefinable {n} (F : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) : Definable n F where
out xs := (F (mk <| xs ·)).out
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ (· ∈ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet where
mem t s := ZFSet.Mem s t
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hb
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
simp [ZFSet.ext_iff]
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map₂ PSet.insert
fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun _ _ _ => PSet.mem_insert_iff.trans (or_congr_left eq.symm)
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_singleton.trans eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton (x : ZFSet) : {x, x} = ({x} : ZFSet) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x, y} : ZFSet) = {z} ↔ x = z ∧ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← mem_singleton]
simp [← h]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact pair_eq_singleton y
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_pair_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y, z} ↔ x = y ∧ x = z := by
rw [eq_comm, pair_eq_singleton_iff]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map (PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y))
fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
PSet.mem_sep (p := p ∘ mk) fun _ _ h => (Quotient.sound h).subst
@[simp]
theorem sep_empty (p : ZFSet → Prop) : (∅ : ZFSet).sep p = ∅ :=
(eq_empty _).mpr fun _ h ↦ not_mem_empty _ (mem_sep.mp h).1
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.powerset
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_powerset.trans subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
obtain ⟨γδ, δγ⟩ := hb
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.sUnion
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
define `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := (⋃₀ x).sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z)
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_sUnion.trans
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
unfold sInter
simp only [and_iff_right_iff_imp, mem_sep]
intro mem
apply mem_sUnion.mpr
replace ⟨s, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, h, mem _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := by simp [sInter]
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
instance : IsWellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨mem_wf⟩
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm_of (· ∈ ·)
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl_of (· ∈ ·) x
theorem not_subset_of_mem {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ y) : ¬ y ⊆ x :=
fun h' ↦ mem_irrefl _ (h' h)
theorem not_mem_of_subset {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ⊆ y) : y ∉ x :=
imp_not_comm.2 not_subset_of_mem h
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let r := Definable₁.out f
Quotient.map (PSet.image r)
fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).symm
theorem image.mk (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] (x) {y} : y ∈ x → f y ∈ image f x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => by
simp only [mk_eq, ← Definable₁.mk_out (f := f)]
exact ⟨a, Definable₁.out_equiv f ya⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_image {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, ((Quotient.sound ya).trans Definable₁.mk_out).symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ => e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
/-- The range of a type-indexed family of sets. -/
noncomputable def range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⟦⟨_, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ (equivShrink α).symm⟩⟧
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α} [Small.{u} α] {f : α → ZFSet.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} :
x ∈ range f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨(equivShrink α).symm z, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use equivShrink α z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) :
(range f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
(powerset (powerset (x ∪ y))).sep fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := by
intro x x' y y' H
simp_rw [ZFSet.ext_iff, pair, mem_pair] at H
obtain rfl : x = x' := And.left <| by simpa [or_and_left] using (H {x}).1 (Or.inl rfl)
have he : y = x → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
simpa [eq_comm] using H {y, y'}
have hx := H {x, y}
simp_rw [pair_eq_singleton_iff, true_and, or_true, true_iff] at hx
refine ⟨rfl, hx.elim he fun hy ↦ Or.elim ?_ he id⟩
simpa using ZFSet.ext_iff.1 hy y
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
instance : Definable₁ ({·}) := .mk ({·}) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ insert := .mk insert (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ pair := by unfold pair; infer_instance
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,214 | 1,217 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
| ∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 202 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
/-- Addition of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q :=
(add_def _ _).symm
/-- Subtraction of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q :=
(sub_def _ _).symm
/-- Additive inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p :=
(neg_def _).symm
/-- The multiplicative unit of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
/-- Multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
/-- Division of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q :=
(div_def _ _).symm
/-- Multiplicative inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ :=
(inv_def _).symm
-- Auxiliary lemma for the `Field` instance
theorem mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {p : RatFunc K}, p ≠ 0 → p * p⁻¹ = 1
| ⟨p⟩, h => by
have : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h <| by rw [hp, ofFractionRing_zero]
simpa only [← ofFractionRing_inv, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_one,
ofFractionRing.injEq] using
mul_inv_cancel₀ this
end IsDomain
section SMul
variable {R : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : R → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| r, ⟨p⟩ => ⟨r • p⟩
instance [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : SMul R (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.smul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (c • p) = c • ofFractionRing p :=
(smul_def _ _).symm
theorem toFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : RatFunc K) :
toFractionRing (c • p) = c • toFractionRing p := by
cases p
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul]
theorem smul_eq_C_smul (x : RatFunc K) (r : K) : r • x = Polynomial.C r • x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Localization.induction_on
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul, ← ofFractionRing_smul, Localization.smul_mk,
Localization.smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul]
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]]
variable [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]]
theorem mk_smul (c : R) (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk (c • p) q = c • RatFunc.mk p q := by
letI : SMulZeroClass R (FractionRing K[X]) := inferInstance
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mk_zero, mk_zero, ← ofFractionRing_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, ← Localization.smul_mk, ←
ofFractionRing_smul]
instance : IsScalarTower R K[X] (RatFunc K) :=
⟨fun c p q => q.induction_on' fun q r _ => by rw [← mk_smul, smul_assoc, mk_smul, mk_smul]⟩
end IsDomain
end SMul
variable (K)
instance [Subsingleton K] : Subsingleton (RatFunc K) :=
toFractionRing_injective.subsingleton
instance : Inhabited (RatFunc K) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial K] : Nontrivial (RatFunc K) :=
ofFractionRing_injective.nontrivial
/-- `RatFunc K` is isomorphic to the field of fractions of `K[X]`, as rings.
This is an auxiliary definition; `simp`-normal form is `IsLocalization.algEquiv`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def toFractionRingRingEquiv : RatFunc K ≃+* FractionRing K[X] where
toFun := toFractionRing
invFun := ofFractionRing
left_inv := fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_add' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_mul]
end Field
section TacticInterlude
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by working in `FractionRing K[X]`. -/
macro "frac_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
· repeat (rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _))
try simp only [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_sub,
← ofFractionRing_neg, ← ofFractionRing_one, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_div,
← ofFractionRing_inv,
add_assoc, zero_add, add_zero, mul_assoc, mul_zero, mul_one, mul_add, inv_zero,
add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, div_eq_mul_inv,
add_mul, zero_mul, one_mul, neg_mul, mul_neg, add_neg_cancel])
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by applying `RatFunc.induction_on`. -/
macro "smul_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
repeat
(first
| rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)
| intro) <;>
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_smul] <;>
simp only [add_comm, mul_comm, zero_smul, succ_nsmul, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_add, mul_one, mul_zero,
neg_add, mul_neg,
Int.cast_zero, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
Int.cast_negSucc, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_succ,
Localization.mk_zero, Localization.add_mk_self, Localization.neg_mk,
ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_neg])
end TacticInterlude
section CommRing
variable (K) [CommRing K]
/-- `RatFunc K` is a commutative monoid.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (RatFunc K) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by frac_tac
mul_comm := by frac_tac
one := 1
one_mul := by frac_tac
mul_one := by frac_tac
npow := npowRec
/-- `RatFunc K` is an additive commutative group.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (RatFunc K) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by frac_tac
add_comm := by frac_tac
zero := 0
zero_add := by frac_tac
add_zero := by frac_tac
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by frac_tac
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by frac_tac
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by smul_tac
nsmul_succ _ := by smul_tac
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by smul_tac
zsmul_succ' _ := by smul_tac
zsmul_neg' _ := by smul_tac
instance instCommRing : CommRing (RatFunc K) :=
{ instCommMonoid K, instAddCommGroup K with
zero := 0
sub := Sub.sub
zero_mul := by frac_tac
mul_zero := by frac_tac
left_distrib := by frac_tac
right_distrib := by frac_tac
one := 1
nsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul := (· • ·)
npow := npowRec }
variable {K}
section LiftHom
open RatFunc
variable {G₀ L R S F : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero G₀] [Field L] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R[X] S[X]]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def map [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →* RatFunc S where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f
(fun n d => if h : φ d ∈ S[X]⁰ then ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, h⟩) else 0)
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
simp only [Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq), Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq'),
dif_pos, ofFractionRing.injEq, Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff]
refine Localization.r_of_eq ?_
simpa only [map_mul] using congr_arg φ h
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, OneMemClass.one_mem, dite_true, ofFractionRing.injEq,
Localization.mk_one, Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x; obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
have hq : φ q ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q.prop
have hq' : φ q' ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q'.prop
have hqq' : φ ↑(q * q') ∈ S[X]⁰ := by simpa using Submonoid.mul_mem _ hq hq'
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos hq,
dif_pos hq', dif_pos hqq', ← ofFractionRing_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul,
Localization.mk_mul, Submonoid.mk_mul_mk]
theorem map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
map φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) =
ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, hφ d.prop⟩) := by
simp only [map, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ d.2), ↓reduceDIte]
theorem map_injective [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ)
(hf : Function.Injective φ) : Function.Injective (map φ hφ) := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
simpa only [map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, ofFractionRing_injective.eq_iff,
Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff, Localization.r_iff_exists, mul_cancel_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors,
exists_const, ← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] using h
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →+* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapRingHom [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S :=
{ map φ hφ with
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, ← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰),
← Localization.mk_zero (1 : S[X]⁰), map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, map_zero,
Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
· simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk, map_add, map_mul,
MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul,
-- We have to specify `S[X]⁰` to `mk_mul_mk`, otherwise it will try to rewrite
-- the wrong occurrence.
Submonoid.mk_mul_mk S[X]⁰] }
theorem coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapRingHom φ hφ : RatFunc R → RatFunc S) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
-- TODO: Generalize to `FunLike` classes,
/-- Lift a monoid with zero homomorphism `R[X] →*₀ G₀` to a `RatFunc R →*₀ G₀`
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftMonoidWithZeroHom (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →*₀ G₀ where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f (fun p q => φ p / φ q) fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim p q, Subsingleton.elim p' q, Subsingleton.elim q' q]
rw [div_eq_div_iff, ← map_mul, mul_comm p, h, map_mul, mul_comm] <;>
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ ‹_›)
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, div_one]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with p q
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p' q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul]
simp only [liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, div_mul_div_comm, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰), liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
map_zero, zero_div]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ)
(n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ') := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with a
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with a'
simp_rw [liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
intro h
congr 1
refine Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr (Localization.r_of_eq (M := R[X]) ?_)
have := mul_eq_mul_of_div_eq_div _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, hφ.eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_comm a'.fst] at this
all_goals exact map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)
/-- Lift an injective ring homomorphism `R[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc R →+* L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftRingHom (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →+* L :=
{ liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ.toMonoidWithZeroHom hφ with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidWithZeroHom.toZeroHom_coe]
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (x + y) y, Subsingleton.elim x 0, map_zero, zero_add]
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk]
simp only [RingHom.toMonoidWithZeroHom_eq_coe,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
rw [div_add_div, div_eq_div_iff]
· rw [mul_comm _ p, mul_comm _ p', mul_comm _ (φ p'), add_comm]
simp only [map_add, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
all_goals
try simp only [← map_mul, ← Submonoid.coe_mul]
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)) }
theorem liftRingHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X])
(d : R[X]⁰) : liftRingHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _
theorem liftRingHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftRingHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
end LiftHom
variable (K)
@[stacks 09FK]
instance instField [IsDomain K] : Field (RatFunc K) where
inv_zero := by frac_tac
div := (· / ·)
div_eq_mul_inv := by frac_tac
mul_inv_cancel _ := mul_inv_cancel
zpow := zpowRec
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
section IsFractionRing
/-! ### `RatFunc` as field of fractions of `Polynomial` -/
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
instance (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] : Algebra R (RatFunc K) where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun x := RatFunc.mk (algebraMap _ _ x) 1
map_add' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_add, ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_mul, ofFractionRing_mul]
map_one' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_one, ofFractionRing_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_zero, ofFractionRing_zero] }
smul := (· • ·)
smul_def' c x := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on' with p q hq
rw [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, mk_one', ← mk_smul,
mk_def_of_ne (c • p) hq, mk_def_of_ne p hq, ← ofFractionRing_mul,
IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' _ _ := mul_comm _ _
variable {K}
/-- The coercion from polynomials to rational functions, implemented as the algebra map from a
domain to its field of fractions -/
@[coe]
def coePolynomial (P : Polynomial K) : RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _ P
instance : Coe (Polynomial K) (RatFunc K) := ⟨coePolynomial⟩
theorem mk_one (x : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk x 1 = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
theorem ofFractionRing_algebraMap (x : K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (algebraMap _ (FractionRing K[X]) x) = algebraMap _ _ x := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_one']
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_div (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk p q = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
simp only [mk_eq_div', ofFractionRing_div, ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
@[simp]
theorem div_smul {R} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]] [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]] (c : R)
(p q : K[X]) :
algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) (c • p) / algebraMap _ _ q =
c • (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, mk_smul, mk_eq_div]
theorem algebraMap_apply {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] (x : R) :
algebraMap R (RatFunc K) x = algebraMap _ _ (algebraMap R K[X] x) / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by
rw [← mk_eq_div]
rfl
theorem map_apply_div_ne_zero {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
have hq' : φ q ≠ 0 := nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hq))
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk,
mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq']
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_div {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· have : (0 : RatFunc K) = algebraMap K[X] _ 0 / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by simp
rw [map_zero, map_zero, map_zero, div_zero, div_zero, this, map_apply_div_ne_zero, map_one,
map_one, div_one, map_zero, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero
exact map_apply_div_ne_zero _ _ _ _ hq
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· simp only [div_zero, map_zero]
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
@[simp]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q := by
rw [← map_div₀, liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _
@[simp]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _
variable (K)
theorem ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap :
ofFractionRing ∘ algebraMap K[X] (FractionRing K[X]) = algebraMap _ _ :=
funext ofFractionRing_algebraMap
theorem algebraMap_injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)) := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap]
exact ofFractionRing_injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
variable {K}
section LiftAlgHom
variable {L R S : Type*} [Field L] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]]
[Algebra S L] [Algebra S R[X]] (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
/-- Lift an algebra homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]`
to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapAlgHom (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R :=
{ mapRingHom φ hφ with
commutes' := fun r => by
simp_rw [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map, algebraMap_apply r, map_apply_div,
map_one, AlgHom.commutes] }
theorem coe_mapAlgHom_eq_coe_map (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) :
| (mapAlgHom φ hφ : RatFunc K → RatFunc R) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
/-- Lift an injective algebra homomorphism `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 619 | 622 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Riccardo Brasca, Adam Topaz, Jujian Zhang, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Projective.Resolution
/-!
# Left-derived functors
We define the left-derived functors `F.leftDerived n : C ⥤ D` for any additive functor `F`
out of a category with projective resolutions.
We first define a functor
`F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory : C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ)` which is
`projectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _`. We show that if `X : C` and
`P : ProjectiveResolution X`, then `F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` identifies
to the image in the homotopy category of the functor `F` applied objectwise to `P.complex`
(this isomorphism is `P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F`).
Then, the left-derived functors `F.leftDerived n : C ⥤ D` are obtained by composing
`F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory` with the homology functors on the homotopy category.
Similarly we define natural transformations between left-derived functors coming from
natural transformations between the original additive functors,
and show how to compute the components.
## Main results
* `Functor.isZero_leftDerived_obj_projective_succ`: projective objects have no higher
left derived functor.
* `NatTrans.leftDerived`: the natural isomorphism between left derived functors
induced by natural transformation.
* `Functor.fromLeftDerivedZero`: the natural transformation `F.leftDerived 0 ⟶ F`,
which is an isomorphism when `F` is right exact (i.e. preserves finite colimits),
see also `Functor.leftDerivedZeroIsoSelf`.
## TODO
* refactor `Functor.leftDerived` (and `Functor.rightDerived`) when the necessary
material enters mathlib: derived categories, injective/projective derivability
structures, existence of derived functors from derivability structures.
Eventually, we shall get a right derived functor
`F.leftDerivedFunctorMinus : DerivedCategory.Minus C ⥤ DerivedCategory.Minus D`,
and `F.leftDerived` shall be redefined using `F.leftDerivedFunctorMinus`.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
[Abelian C] [HasProjectiveResolutions C] [Abelian D]
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
the functor `C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ)` which
sends `X : C` to `F` applied to a projective resolution of `X`. -/
noncomputable def Functor.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) :=
projectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _
/-- If `P : ProjectiveResolution Z` and `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
an isomorphism between `F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` and the complex
obtained by applying `F` to `P.complex`. -/
noncomputable def ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj {X : C}
(P : ProjectiveResolution X) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X ≅
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).obj P.complex :=
(F.mapHomotopyCategory _).mapIso P.iso ≪≫
(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors _).app P.complex
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv ≫ F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ ≫
(Q.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv := by
dsimp [Functor.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory, isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, iso_inv_naturality f P Q φ comm, Functor.map_comp]
erw [(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors (ComplexShape.down ℕ)).inv.naturality_assoc]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f ≫ (Q.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom =
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ := by
dsimp
rw [← cancel_epi (P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality_assoc f P Q φ comm F,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
/-- The left derived functors of an additive functor. -/
noncomputable def Functor.leftDerived (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ D :=
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⋙ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n
/-- We can compute a left derived functor using a chosen projective resolution. -/
noncomputable def ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj {X : C} (P : ProjectiveResolution X)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.leftDerived n).obj X ≅
(HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor D _ n).obj
((F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj P.complex) :=
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n).mapIso
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F) ≪≫
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) n).app _
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.leftDerived n).map f ≫ (Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom =
(P.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ := by
dsimp [isoLeftDerivedObj, Functor.leftDerived]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality f P Q φ comm F,
Functor.map_comp, assoc]
erw [(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) n).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
| (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(P.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).inv ≫ (F.leftDerived n).map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ ≫
(Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom, assoc, assoc,
ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_hom_naturality f P Q φ comm F n,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
/-- The higher derived functors vanish on projective objects. -/
lemma Functor.isZero_leftDerived_obj_projective_succ
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) (X : C) [Projective X] :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/LeftDerived.lean | 134 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Ring
/-!
# Internally-graded rings and algebras
This file defines the typeclass `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, for working with an algebra `A` that is
internally graded by a collection of submodules `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A`.
See the docstring of that typeclass for more information.
## Main definitions
* `GradedRing 𝒜`: the typeclass, which is a combination of `SetLike.GradedMonoid`, and
`DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`: A convenience alias for `GradedRing` when `𝒜` is a family of submodules.
* `DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `DirectSum.decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i` is the linear map from `A` to its degree `i : ι` component, such that
`proj 𝒜 i x = decompose 𝒜 x i`.
## Implementation notes
For now, we do not have internally-graded semirings and internally-graded rings; these can be
represented with `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℕ A` and `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℤ A` respectively, since all
`Semiring`s are ℕ-algebras via `Semiring.toNatAlgebra`, and all `Ring`s are `ℤ`-algebras via
`Ring.toIntAlgebra`.
## Tags
graded algebra, graded ring, graded semiring, decomposition
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι R A σ : Type*}
section GradedRing
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
open DirectSum
/-- An internally-graded `R`-algebra `A` is one that can be decomposed into a collection
of `Submodule R A`s indexed by `ι` such that the canonical map `A → ⨁ i, 𝒜 i` is bijective and
respects multiplication, i.e. the product of an element of degree `i` and an element of degree `j`
is an element of degree `i + j`.
Note that the fact that `A` is internally-graded, `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, implies an externally-graded
algebra structure `DirectSum.GAlgebra R (fun i ↦ ↥(𝒜 i))`, which in turn makes available an
`Algebra R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i)` instance.
-/
class GradedRing (𝒜 : ι → σ) extends SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜, DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜
variable [GradedRing 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
a ring to a direct sum of components. -/
def decomposeRingEquiv : A ≃+* ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
RingEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := (coeRingHom 𝒜).map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem decompose_one : decompose 𝒜 (1 : A) = 1 :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜)
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_one : (decompose 𝒜).symm 1 = (1 : A) :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm
@[simp]
theorem decompose_mul (x y : A) : decompose 𝒜 (x * y) = decompose 𝒜 x * decompose 𝒜 y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜) x y
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_mul (x y : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (x * y) = (decompose 𝒜).symm x * (decompose 𝒜).symm y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm x y
end DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of a graded ring -/
def GradedRing.proj (i : ι) : A →+ A :=
(AddSubmonoidClass.subtype (𝒜 i)).comp <|
(DFinsupp.evalAddMonoidHom i).comp <|
RingHom.toAddMonoidHom <| RingEquiv.toRingHom <| DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜
@[simp]
theorem GradedRing.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedRing.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (DirectSum.of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedRing.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedRing.mem_support_iff [∀ (i) (x : 𝒜 i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedRing
section AddCancelMonoid
open DirectSum
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Semiring A] [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable {i j : ι}
namespace DirectSum
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_add]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 j) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 j using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_add]
theorem decompose_mul_add_left [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] (a : 𝒜 i) {b : A} :
decompose 𝒜 (↑a * b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ a (decompose 𝒜 b j) :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem 𝒜 a.2
theorem decompose_mul_add_right [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a : A} (b : 𝒜 j) :
decompose 𝒜 (a * ↑b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ (decompose 𝒜 a i) b :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem 𝒜 b.2
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) j : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 0 using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_mem_zero]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) i : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 0 using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_mem_zero]
end DirectSum
end AddCancelMonoid
section GradedAlgebra
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A)
/-- A special case of `GradedRing` with `σ = Submodule R A`. This is useful both because it
can avoid typeclass search, and because it provides a more concise name. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra :=
GradedRing 𝒜
/-- A helper to construct a `GradedAlgebra` when the `SetLike.GradedMonoid` structure is already
available. This makes the `left_inv` condition easier to prove, and phrases the `right_inv`
condition in a way that allows custom `@[ext]` lemmas to apply.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra.ofAlgHom [SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜] (decompose : A →ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i)
(right_inv : (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜).comp decompose = AlgHom.id R A)
(left_inv : ∀ i (x : 𝒜 i), decompose (x : A) = DirectSum.of (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) i x) :
GradedAlgebra 𝒜 where
decompose' := decompose
left_inv := AlgHom.congr_fun right_inv
right_inv := by
suffices decompose.comp (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜) = AlgHom.id _ _ from AlgHom.congr_fun this
ext i x : 2
exact (decompose.congr_arg <| DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of _ _ _).trans (left_inv i x)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
an algebra to a direct sum of components. -/
-- Porting note: deleted [simps] and added the corresponding lemmas by hand
def decomposeAlgEquiv : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
AlgEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := map_mul (coeAlgHom 𝒜)
commutes' := (coeAlgHom 𝒜).commutes }
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_apply (a : A) :
decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 a = decompose 𝒜 a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_symm_apply (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm a = (decompose 𝒜).symm a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decompose_algebraMap (r : R) :
decompose 𝒜 (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).commutes r
@[simp]
lemma decompose_symm_algebraMap (r : R) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r) = algebraMap R A r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm.commutes r
end DirectSum
open DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of graded algebra -/
def GradedAlgebra.proj (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜] (i : ι) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(𝒜 i).subtype.comp <| (DFinsupp.lapply i).comp <| (decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).toAlgHom.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedAlgebra.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedAlgebra.mem_support_iff [DecidableEq A] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans Submodule.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedAlgebra
| section CanonicalOrder
open SetLike.GradedMonoid DirectSum
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/Basic.lean | 239 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 1,660 | 1,661 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
| theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 537 | 538 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Multilinear maps
We define multilinear maps as maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are linear in each
coordinate. Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type
(although some statements will require it to be a fintype). This space, denoted by
`MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂`, inherits a module structure by pointwise addition and multiplication.
## Main definitions
* `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of multilinear maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`.
* `f.map_update_smul` is the multiplicativity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_update_add` is the additivity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_smul_univ` expresses the multiplicativity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`.
* `f.map_add_univ` expresses the additivity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time, writing
`f (m + m')` as the sum over all subsets `s` of `ι` of `f (s.piecewise m m')`.
* `f.map_sum` expresses `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` as the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all possible functions.
See `Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry` for the currying of multilinear maps.
## Implementation notes
Expressing that a map is linear along the `i`-th coordinate when all other coordinates are fixed
can be done in two (equivalent) different ways:
* fixing a vector `m : ∀ (j : ι - i), M₁ j.val`, and then choosing separately the `i`-th coordinate
* fixing a vector `m : ∀j, M₁ j`, and then modifying its `i`-th coordinate
The second way is more artificial as the value of `m` at `i` is not relevant, but it has the
advantage of avoiding subtype inclusion issues. This is the definition we use, based on
`Function.update` that allows to change the value of `m` at `i`.
Note that the use of `Function.update` requires a `DecidableEq ι` term to appear somewhere in the
statement of `MultilinearMap.map_update_add'` and `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul'`.
Three possible choices are:
1. Requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `MultilinearMap` (as we did originally).
2. Using `Classical.decEq ι` in the statement of `map_add'` and `map_smul'`.
3. Quantifying over all possible `DecidableEq ι` instances in the statement of `map_add'` and
`map_smul'`.
Option 1 works fine, but puts unnecessary constraints on the user
(the zero map certainly does not need decidability).
Option 2 looks great at first, but in the common case when `ι = Fin n`
it introduces non-defeq decidability instance diamonds
within the context of proving `map_update_add'` and `map_update_smul'`,
of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = Classical.decEq (Fin n)`.
Option 3 of course does something similar, but of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = _inst`,
which is much easier to clean up since `_inst` is a free variable
and so the equality can just be substituted.
-/
open Fin Function Finset Set
universe uR uS uι v v' v₁ v₂ v₃
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS} {ι : Type uι} {n : ℕ}
{M : Fin n.succ → Type v} {M₁ : ι → Type v₁} {M₂ : Type v₂} {M₃ : Type v₃} {M' : Type v'}
-- Don't generate injectivity lemmas, which the `simpNF` linter will time out on.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- Multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules
over `R`. -/
structure MultilinearMap (R : Type uR) {ι : Type uι} (M₁ : ι → Type v₁) (M₂ : Type v₂) [Semiring R]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] where
/-- The underlying multivariate function of a multilinear map. -/
toFun : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂
/-- A multilinear map is additive in every argument. -/
map_update_add' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (x + y)) = toFun (update m i x) + toFun (update m i y)
/-- A multilinear map is compatible with scalar multiplication in every argument. -/
map_update_smul' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (c • x)) = c • toFun (update m i x)
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[Module R M₃] [Module R M'] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : FunLike (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; cases h; rfl
initialize_simps_projections MultilinearMap (toFun → apply)
/-- Constructor for `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` when the
index type `ι` is already endowed with a `DecidableEq` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' [DecidableEq ι] (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂)
(h₁ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) := by aesop)
(h₂ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) := by aesop) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' m i x y := by convert h₁ m i x y
map_update_smul' m i c x := by convert h₂ m i c x
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) (h₁ h₂) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (h : f = g) (x : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
nonrec theorem congr_arg (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {x y : ∀ i, M₁ i} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} : (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add' := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
/-- Earlier, this name was used by what is now called `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul_left`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul' := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 := by
classical
have : (0 : R) • (0 : M₁ i) = 0 := by simp
rw [← update_eq_self i m, h, ← this, f.map_update_smul, zero_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_update_zero [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ Set.univ := Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty ι
exact map_coord_zero f i rfl
instance : Add (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' =>
⟨fun x => f x + f' x, fun m i x y => by simp [add_left_comm, add_assoc], fun m i c x => by
simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
instance : Zero (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 0, fun _ _ _ _ => by simp, fun _ _ c _ => by simp⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [DistribSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
instance : SMul S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f =>
⟨fun m => c • f m, fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add], fun l i x d => by
simp [← smul_comm x c (_ : M₂)]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (c : S) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
theorem coe_smul (c : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ⇑(c • f) = c • (⇑ f) := rfl
end SMul
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Coercion of a multilinear map to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def coeAddMonoidHom : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ (((i : ι) → M₁ i) → M₂) where
toFun := DFunLike.coe; map_zero' := rfl; map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(f a) :=
map_sum coeAddMonoidHom f s
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) {s : Finset α} :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m := by simp
/-- If `f` is a multilinear map, then `f.toLinearMap m i` is the linear map obtained by fixing all
coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the `i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps]
def toLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun x := f (update m i x)
map_add' x y := by simp
map_smul' c x := by simp
/-- The cartesian product of two multilinear maps, as a multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun m := (f m, g m)
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
/-- Combine a family of multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
@[simps]
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, MultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : MultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun m i := f i m
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_add _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_smul _ _ _ _
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- Equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃` and one-multilinear maps. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f (x i)
map_update_add' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton]
map_update_smul' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f fun _ ↦ x
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_add 0 i x y
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_smul 0 i c x }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext x; refine congr_arg f ?_; exact (eq_const_of_subsingleton _ _).symm
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := Function.const _ m
map_update_add' _ := isEmptyElim
map_update_smul' _ := isEmptyElim
end
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset `s` of `k`
of these variables, one gets a new multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying these variables, and fixing
the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by `f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit identification between `Fin k` and `s` that
we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => M') M₂) (s : Finset (Fin n))
(hk : #s = k) (z : M') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin k => M') M₂ where
toFun v := f fun j => if h : j ∈ s then v ((s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm ⟨j, h⟩) else z
/- Porting note: The proofs of the following two lemmas used to only use `erw` followed by `simp`,
but it seems `erw` no longer unfolds or unifies well enough to work without more help. -/
map_update_add' v i x y := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
map_update_smul' v i c x := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `snoc`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (x y : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (x + y)) = f (snoc m x) + f (snoc m y) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_snoc_last]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (c : R)
(x : M (last n)) : f (snoc m (c • x)) = c • f (snoc m x) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_snoc_last]
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)]
variable {M₁'' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁'' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁'' i)]
/-- If `g` is a multilinear map and `f` is a collection of linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a multilinear map, that we call
`g.compLinearMap f`. -/
def compLinearMap (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun m := g fun i => f i (m i)
map_update_add' m i x y := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_apply (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : g.compLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i (m i) :=
rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map twice with a linear map in each argument is
the same as composing with their composition. -/
theorem compLinearMap_assoc (g : MultilinearMap R M₁'' M₂) (f₁ : ∀ i, M₁' i →ₗ[R] M₁'' i)
(f₂ : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap f₁).compLinearMap f₂ = g.compLinearMap fun i => f₁ i ∘ₗ f₂ i :=
rfl
/-- Composing the zero multilinear map with a linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_compLinearMap (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(0 : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂).compLinearMap f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map with the identity linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_id (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) :
(g.compLinearMap fun _ => LinearMap.id) = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing with a family of surjective linear maps is injective. -/
theorem compLinearMap_injective (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) :
Injective fun g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ => g.compLinearMap f := fun g₁ g₂ h =>
ext fun x => by
simpa [fun i => surjInv_eq (hf i)]
using MultilinearMap.ext_iff.mp h fun i => surjInv (hf i) (x i)
theorem compLinearMap_inj (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i))
(g₁ g₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) : g₁.compLinearMap f = g₂.compLinearMap f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
(compLinearMap_injective _ hf).eq_iff
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear equiv on each argument gives the zero map
if and only if the multilinear map is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem comp_linearEquiv_eq_zero_iff (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i ≃ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)) = 0 ↔ g = 0 := by
set f' := fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
rw [← zero_compLinearMap f', compLinearMap_inj f' fun i => (f i).surjective]
end
/-- If one adds to a vector `m'` another vector `m`, but only for coordinates in a finset `t`, then
the image under a multilinear map `f` is the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` along all subsets `s` of
`t`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when `t = univ`, given in
`map_add_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not require the index set `ι`
to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
revert m'
refine Finset.induction_on t (by simp) ?_
intro i t hit Hrec m'
have A : (insert i t).piecewise (m + m') m' = update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i + m' i) :=
t.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m' i) = t.piecewise (m + m') m' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [hit]
· simp [h]
let m'' := update m' i (m i)
have C : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i) = t.piecewise (m + m'') m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ t <;> simp [m'', h, hit, h']
rw [A, f.map_update_add, B, C, Finset.sum_powerset_insert hit, Hrec, Hrec, add_comm (_ : M₂)]
congr 1
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun s hs => ?_
have : (insert i s).piecewise m m' = s.piecewise m m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', Finset.not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem hs hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [m'', h, h']
rw [this]
/-- Additivity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
simpa using f.map_piecewise_add m m' Finset.univ
section ApplySum
variable {α : ι → Type*} (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
open Fintype Finset
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. Here, we give an auxiliary statement tailored for an inductive proof. Use instead
`map_sum_finset`. -/
theorem map_sum_finset_aux [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ} (h : (∑ i, #(A i)) = n) :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
letI := fun i => Classical.decEq (α i)
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing A with | h n IH =>
-- If one of the sets is empty, then all the sums are zero
by_cases Ai_empty : ∃ i, A i = ∅
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j = 0 := Ai_empty.imp fun i hi ↦ by simp [hi]
have hpi : piFinset A = ∅ := by simpa
rw [f.map_coord_zero i hi, hpi, Finset.sum_empty]
push_neg at Ai_empty
-- Otherwise, if all sets are at most singletons, then they are exactly singletons and the result
-- is again straightforward
by_cases Ai_singleton : ∀ i, #(A i) ≤ 1
· have Ai_card : ∀ i, #(A i) = 1 := by
intro i
have pos : #(A i) ≠ 0 := by simp [Finset.card_eq_zero, Ai_empty i]
have : #(A i) ≤ 1 := Ai_singleton i
exact le_antisymm this (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (_root_.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr pos))
have :
∀ r : ∀ i, α i, r ∈ piFinset A → (f fun i => g i (r i)) = f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j := by
intro r hr
congr with i
have : ∀ j ∈ A i, g i j = g i (r i) := by
intro j hj
congr
apply Finset.card_le_one_iff.1 (Ai_singleton i) hj
exact mem_piFinset.mp hr i
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.sum_const, Ai_card i, one_nsmul]
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Ai_card, card_piFinset, prod_const_one, one_nsmul,
Finset.sum_const]
-- Remains the interesting case where one of the `A i`, say `A i₀`, has cardinality at least 2.
-- We will split into two parts `B i₀` and `C i₀` of smaller cardinality, let `B i = C i = A i`
-- for `i ≠ i₀`, apply the inductive assumption to `B` and `C`, and add up the corresponding
-- parts to get the sum for `A`.
push_neg at Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ : ∃ i, 1 < #(A i) := Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨j₁, j₂, _, hj₂, _⟩ : ∃ j₁ j₂, j₁ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₂ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₁ ≠ j₂ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.1 hi₀
let B := Function.update A i₀ (A i₀ \ {j₂})
let C := Function.update A i₀ {j₂}
have B_subset_A : ∀ i, B i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [B, sdiff_subset, update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
have C_subset_A : ∀ i, C i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [C, hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
-- split the sum at `i₀` as the sum over `B i₀` plus the sum over `C i₀`, to use additivity.
have A_eq_BC :
(fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) =
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀
((∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) + ∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi, update_self]
have : A i₀ = B i₀ ∪ C i₀ := by
simp only [B, C, Function.update_self, Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
symm
simp only [hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.union_eq_left]
rw [this]
refine Finset.sum_union <| Finset.disjoint_right.2 fun j hj => ?_
have : j = j₂ := by
simpa [C] using hj
rw [this]
simp only [B, mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, not_false_iff, Finset.mem_singleton,
update_self, and_false]
· simp [hi]
have Beq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ B i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
have Ceq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ C i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- Express the inductive assumption for `B`
have Brec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ B i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset B, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : ∑ i, #(B i) < ∑ i, #(A i) := by
refine sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => card_le_card (B_subset_A i)) ⟨i₀, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
have : {j₂} ⊆ A i₀ := by simp [hj₂]
simp only [B, Finset.card_sdiff this, Function.update_self, Finset.card_singleton]
exact Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one hi₀))
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this B rfl
-- Express the inductive assumption for `C`
have Crec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ C i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset C, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : (∑ i, #(C i)) < ∑ i, #(A i) :=
Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => Finset.card_le_card (C_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp [C, hi₀]⟩
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this C rfl
have D : Disjoint (piFinset B) (piFinset C) :=
haveI : Disjoint (B i₀) (C i₀) := by simp [B, C]
piFinset_disjoint_of_disjoint B C this
have pi_BC : piFinset A = piFinset B ∪ piFinset C := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm
· intro r hr
by_cases hri₀ : r i₀ = j₂
· apply Finset.mem_union_right
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ C i₀ := by simp [C, hri₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [C, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· apply Finset.mem_union_left
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ B i₀ := by simp [B, hri₀, mem_piFinset.1 hr i₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [B, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· exact
Finset.union_subset (piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => B_subset_A i)
(piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => C_subset_A i)
rw [A_eq_BC]
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, Beq, Ceq, Brec, Crec, pi_BC]
rw [← Finset.sum_union D]
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset_aux _ _ rfl
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset g fun _ => Finset.univ
theorem map_update_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (t : Finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M₁ i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f (update m i (∑ a ∈ t, g a)) = ∑ a ∈ t, f (update m i (g a)) := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, ih]
end ApplySum
/-- Restrict the codomain of a multilinear map to a submodule.
This is the multilinear version of `LinearMap.codRestrict`. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ p where
toFun v := ⟨f v, h v⟩
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_add _ _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_smul _ _ _ _ _
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' := f.map_update_add
map_update_smul' m i := (f.toLinearMap m i).map_smul_of_tower
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
section
variable {ι₁ ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
/-- Transfer the arguments to a map along an equivalence between argument indices.
The naming is derived from `Finsupp.domCongr`, noting that here the permutation applies to the
domain of the domain. -/
@[simps apply]
def domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun v := m fun i => v (σ i)
map_update_add' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_smul]
theorem domDomCongr_trans (σ₁ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (σ₂ : ι₂ ≃ ι₃)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₁.trans σ₂) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
theorem domDomCongr_mul (σ₁ : Equiv.Perm ι₁) (σ₂ : Equiv.Perm ι₁)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₂ * σ₁) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as an equivalence.
This is declared separately because it does not work with dot notation. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrEquiv (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
right_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
/-- The results of applying `domDomCongr` to two maps are equal if
and only if those maps are. -/
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_iff (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (f g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
f.domDomCongr σ = g.domDomCongr σ ↔ f = g :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : _ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ => M₂) M₃).apply_eq_iff_eq
end
/-! If `{a // P a}` is a subtype of `ι` and if we fix an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`,
then a multilinear map on `M₁` defines a multilinear map on the restriction of `M₁` to
`{a // P a}`, by fixing the arguments out of `{a // P a}` equal to the values of `z`. -/
lemma domDomRestrict_aux {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then Function.update x i c ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h, Function.update_self]
simp only [i.2, update_self, dite_true]
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h]
by_cases h' : P j
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_true]
have h'' : ¬ ⟨j, h'⟩ = i :=
fun he => by apply_fun (fun x => x.1) at he; exact h he
rw [Function.update_of_ne h'']
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_false]
lemma domDomRestrict_aux_right {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // ¬ P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else Function.update z i c ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
simpa only [dite_not] using domDomRestrict_aux _ z (fun j ↦ x ⟨j.1, not_not.mp j.2⟩) i c
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `(i : ι) → M i`, a (decidable) predicate `P` on `ι` and
an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`, construct a multilinear map on
`(i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i)` whose value at `x` is `f` evaluated at the vector with `i`th coordinate
`x i` if `P i` and `z i` otherwise.
The naming is similar to `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`: here we are applying the restriction to the
domain of the domain.
For a linear map version, see `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrictₗ`.
-/
def domDomRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
(z : (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂ where
toFun x := f (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩)
map_update_add' x i a b := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' z i c a := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul]
@[simp]
lemma domDomRestrict_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred P] (x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
f.domDomRestrict P z x = f (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) := rfl
-- TODO: Should add a ref here when available.
/-- The "derivative" of a multilinear map, as a linear map from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`.
For continuous multilinear maps, this will indeed be the derivative. -/
def linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) : ((i : ι) → M₁ i) →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
∑ i : ι, (f.toLinearMap x i).comp (LinearMap.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x y : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_proj, Finset.sum_apply,
Function.comp_apply, Function.eval, toLinearMap_apply]
end Semiring
end MultilinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear map gives again a multilinear map. -/
def compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g ∘ f
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
⇑(g.compMultilinearMap f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_apply (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compMultilinearMap f m = g (f m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_zero (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
g.compMultilinearMap (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = 0 :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_zero g
@[simp]
theorem zero_compMultilinearMap (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).compMultilinearMap f = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_add (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (f₁ + f₂) = g.compMultilinearMap f₁ + g.compMultilinearMap f₂ :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_add g _ _
@[simp]
theorem add_compMultilinearMap (g₁ g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).compMultilinearMap f = g₁.compMultilinearMap f + g₂.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_smul [DistribSMul S M₂] [DistribSMul S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (s • f) = s • g.compMultilinearMap f :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => g.map_smul_of_tower _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul_compMultilinearMap [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(s • g).compMultilinearMap f = s • g.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.subtype_comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem subtype_compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(h) : p.subtype.compMultilinearMap (f.codRestrict p h) = f :=
rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(p : Submodule R M₃) (h) :
(g.codRestrict p h).compMultilinearMap f =
(g.compMultilinearMap f).codRestrict p fun v => h (f v) :=
rfl
variable {ι₁ ι₂ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M') M₂) :
(g.compMultilinearMap f).domDomCongr σ = g.compMultilinearMap (f.domDomCongr σ) := by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr]
end LinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [(i : ι) → AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [(i : ι) → Module R (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [Module R M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] :
DistribMulAction S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.distribMulAction coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
section Module
variable [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.module _ coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors S M₂] : NoZeroSMulDivisors S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ rfl coe_smul
variable [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module S M₃] [Module R M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
variable (S) in
/-- `LinearMap.compMultilinearMap` as an `S`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.LinearMap.compMultilinearMapₗ [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g.compMultilinearMap
map_add' := g.compMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := g.compMultilinearMap_smul
variable (R S M₁ M₂ M₃)
section OfSubsingleton
/-- Linear equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃`
and one-multilinear maps `MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def ofSubsingletonₗ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ :=
{ ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
end OfSubsingleton
/-- The dependent version of `MultilinearMap.domDomCongrLinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv' {ι' : Type*} (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun i => M₁ (σ.symm i)) M₂ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ (σ.piCongrLeft' M₁).symm
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_smul] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ σ.piCongrLeft' M₁
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_smul] }
map_add' f₁ f₂ := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
left_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The space of constant maps is equivalent to the space of maps that are multilinear with respect
to an empty family. -/
@[simps]
def constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f := f 0
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := ext fun _ => MultilinearMap.congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv {ι₁ ι₂} (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ :=
{ (domDomCongrEquiv σ :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃) with
map_smul' := fun c f => by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr] }
end Module
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [Π i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [Π i, Module R (M₁' i)]
/-- Given a predicate `P`, one may associate to a multilinear map `f` a multilinear map
from the elements satisfying `P` to the multilinear maps on elements not satisfying `P`.
In other words, splitting the variables into two subsets one gets a multilinear map into
multilinear maps.
This is a linear map version of the function `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrict`. -/
def domDomRestrictₗ (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) => M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦ domDomRestrict f P z
map_update_add' := by
intro h m i x y
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
map_update_smul' := by
intro h m i c x
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
lemma iteratedFDeriv_aux {ι} {M₁ : ι → Type*} {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
(s : Set ι) [DecidableEq { x // x ∈ s }] (e : α ≃ s)
(m : α → ((i : ι) → M₁ i)) (a : α) (z : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
(fun i ↦ update m a z (e.symm i) i) =
(fun i ↦ update (fun j ↦ m (e.symm j) j) (e a) (z (e a)) i) := by
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne a (e.symm i) with rfl | hne
· rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply e i, update_self, update_self]
· rw [update_of_ne hne.symm, update_of_ne fun h ↦ (Equiv.symm_apply_apply .. ▸ h ▸ hne) rfl]
/-- One of the components of the iterated derivative of a multilinear map. Given a bijection `e`
between a type `α` (typically `Fin k`) and a subset `s` of `ι`, this component is a multilinear map
of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ`, mapping them to `f (x₁, (v_{e.symm 2})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at
indices `i` in `s` one uses the `i`-th coordinate of the vector `v_{e.symm i}` and otherwise one
uses the `i`-th coordinate of a reference vector `x`.
This is multilinear in the components of `x` outside of `s`, and in the `v_j`. -/
noncomputable def iteratedFDerivComponent {α : Type*}
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {s : Set ι} (e : α ≃ s) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // a ∉ s}) ↦ M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : α) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦
{ toFun := fun v ↦ domDomRestrictₗ f (fun i ↦ i ∈ s) z (fun i ↦ v (e.symm i) i)
map_update_add' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux]
map_update_smul' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux] }
map_update_add' := by intros; ext; simp
map_update_smul' := by intros; ext; simp
open Classical in
/-- The `k`-th iterated derivative of a multilinear map `f` at the point `x`. It is a multilinear
map of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ` (with the same type as `x`), mapping them
to `∑ f (x₁, (v_{i₁})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at each index `j` one uses either `xⱼ` or one
of the `(vᵢ)ⱼ`, and each `vᵢ` has to be used exactly once.
The sum is parameterized by the embeddings of `Fin k` in the index type `ι` (or, equivalently,
by the subsets `s` of `ι` of cardinality `k` and then the bijections between `Fin k` and `s`).
For the continuous version, see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv`. -/
protected noncomputable def iteratedFDeriv [Fintype ι]
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (k : ℕ) (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : Fin k) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂ :=
∑ e : Fin k ↪ ι, iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange (fun i ↦ x i)
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapₗ (f : Π (i : ι), M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := fun g ↦ g.compLinearMap f
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g` and multilinear in
`f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapMultilinear :
@MultilinearMap R ι (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
((MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) _ _ _
(fun _ ↦ LinearMap.module) _ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.compLinearMapₗ
map_update_add' := by
intro _ f i f₁ f₂
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (f₁ + f₂) j <| x j) =
(g fun j ↦ update f i f₁ j <|x j) + g fun j ↦ update f i f₂ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (f₁ + f₂) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₁ j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₂ j
map_update_smul' := by
intro _ f i a f₀
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (a • f₀) j <| x j) = a • g fun j ↦ update f i f₀ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (a • f₀) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₀ j
/--
Let `M₁ᵢ` and `M₁ᵢ'` be two families of `R`-modules and `M₂` an `R`-module.
Let us denote `Π i, M₁ᵢ` and `Π i, M₁ᵢ'` by `M` and `M'` respectively.
If `g` is a multilinear map `M' → M₂`, then `g` can be reinterpreted as a multilinear
map from `Π i, M₁ᵢ ⟶ M₁ᵢ'` to `M ⟶ M₂` via `(fᵢ) ↦ v ↦ g(fᵢ vᵢ)`.
-/
@[simps!] def piLinearMap :
MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ →ₗ[R]
MultilinearMap R (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) where
toFun g := (LinearMap.applyₗ g).compMultilinearMap compLinearMapMultilinear
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
end
/-- If one multiplies by `c i` the coordinates in a finset `s`, then the image under a multilinear
map is multiplied by `∏ i ∈ s, c i`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when
`s = univ`, given in `map_smul_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not
require the index set `ι` to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m := by
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro j s j_not_mem_s Hrec
have A :
Function.update (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) j (m j) =
s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· rw [h]
simp [j_not_mem_s]
· simp [h]
rw [s.piecewise_insert, f.map_update_smul, A, Hrec]
simp [j_not_mem_s, mul_smul]
/-- Multiplicativity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m := by
classical simpa using map_piecewise_smul f c m Finset.univ
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul_left [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update (c • m) i x) = c ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) • f (update m i x) := by
have :
f ((Finset.univ.erase i).piecewise (c • update m i x) (update m i x)) =
(∏ _i ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, c) • f (update m i x) :=
map_piecewise_smul f _ _ _
simpa [← Function.update_smul c m] using this
section
variable (R ι)
variable (A : Type*) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Fintype ι]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebra` is the multilinear map on `A^ι` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin` for a version that works with a non-commutative
algebra `A` but requires `ι = Fin n`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
toFun m := ∏ i, m i
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem, add_mul]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem]
variable {R A ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end
section
variable (R n)
variable (A : Type*) [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebraFin` is the multilinear map on `A^n` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra` for a version that assumes `[CommSemiring A]` but works
for `A^ι` with any finite type `ι`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => A) A :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun m ↦ (List.ofFn m).prod)
(fun m i x y ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, add_mul, this,
mul_add, add_mul])
(fun m i c x ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, this])
variable {R A n}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply_const (a : A) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A fun _ => a) = a ^ n := by simp
end
/-- Given an `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
def smulRight (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ :=
(LinearMap.smulRight LinearMap.id z).compMultilinearMap f
@[simp]
theorem smulRight_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f.smulRight z m = f m • z :=
rfl
variable (R ι)
/-- The canonical multilinear map on `R^ι` when `ι` is finite, associating to `m` the product of
all the `m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module). See also
`mkPiAlgebra` for a more general version. -/
protected def mkPiRing [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ :=
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
variable {R ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) (m : ι → R) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M₂) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f := by
ext m
have : m = fun i => m i • (1 : R) := by
ext j
simp
conv_rhs => rw [this, f.map_smul_univ]
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff [Fintype ι] {z₁ z₂ : M₂} :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔ z₁ = z₂ := by
simp_rw [MultilinearMap.ext_iff, mkPiRing_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using h fun _ => 1
· intro x
simp [h]
theorem mkPiRing_zero [Fintype ι] : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M₂) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, MultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommSemiring
section RangeAddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : Neg (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun m => -f m, fun m i x y => by simp [add_comm], fun m i c x => by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨fun m => f m - g m, fun m i x y => by
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
abel,
fun m i c x => by simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul, smul_sub]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - g) m = f m - g m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
{ MultilinearMap.addCommMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
sub_eq_add_neg := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => sub_eq_add_neg _ _
zsmul := fun n f =>
{ toFun := fun m => n • f m
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add]
map_update_smul' := fun l i x d => by simp [← smul_comm x n (_ : M₂)] }
zsmul_zero' := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_zero' _
zsmul_succ' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_succ' _ _
zsmul_neg' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_neg' _ _ }
end RangeAddCommGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_neg [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (-x)) = -f (update m i x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← MultilinearMap.map_update_add, neg_add_cancel, f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_neg := MultilinearMap.map_update_neg
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, MultilinearMap.map_update_add, map_update_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_sub := MultilinearMap.map_update_sub
lemma map_update [DecidableEq ι] (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (i : ι) (v : M₁ i) :
f (update x i v) = f x - f (update x i (x i - v)) := by
rw [map_update_sub, update_eq_self, sub_sub_cancel]
open Finset in
lemma map_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f a - f (s.piecewise b a) =
∑ i ∈ s, f (fun j ↦ if j ∈ s → j < i then a j else if i = j then a j - b j else b j) := by
refine s.induction_on_min ?_ fun k s hk ih ↦ ?_
· rw [Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_empty, sub_self]
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert, map_update, ← sub_add, ih,
add_comm, sum_insert (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
simp_rw [s.mem_insert]
congr 1
· congr; ext i; split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [update_of_ne, Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
· exact fun h ↦ (hk i h).not_lt (h₁ <| .inr h)
· exact fun h ↦ (h₁ <| .inl h).ne h
· cases h₂
rw [update_self, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
· push_neg at h₁
rw [update_of_ne (Ne.symm h₂), s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ (h₁.1.resolve_left <| Ne.symm h₂)]
· apply sum_congr rfl; intro i hi; congr; ext j; congr 1; apply propext
simp_rw [imp_iff_not_or, not_or]; apply or_congr_left'
intro h; rw [and_iff_right]; rintro rfl; exact h (hk i hi)
/-- This calculates the differences between the values of a multilinear map at
two arguments that differ on a finset `s` of `ι`. It requires a
linear order on `ι` in order to express the result. -/
lemma map_piecewise_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b v : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise a v) - f (s.piecewise b v) = ∑ i ∈ s, f
fun j ↦ if j ∈ s then if j < i then a j else if j = i then a j - b j else b j else v j := by
rw [← s.piecewise_idem_right b a, map_sub_map_piecewise]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg f <| funext fun j ↦ ?_
by_cases hjs : j ∈ s
· rw [if_pos hjs]; by_cases hji : j < i
· rw [if_pos fun _ ↦ hji, if_pos hji, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hjs]
rw [if_neg (Classical.not_imp.mpr ⟨hjs, hji⟩), if_neg hji]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [if_pos rfl, if_pos rfl, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hi]
· rw [if_neg hij, if_neg hij.symm]
· rw [if_neg hjs, if_pos fun h ↦ (hjs h).elim, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ hjs]
open Finset in
lemma map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) = f x + f.linearDeriv x h + ∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, f (s.piecewise h x) := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_univ, ← Finset.powerset_univ,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not _ (2 ≤ #·)]
simp_rw [not_le, Nat.lt_succ, le_iff_lt_or_eq (b := 1), Nat.lt_one_iff, filter_or,
← powersetCard_eq_filter, sum_union (univ.pairwise_disjoint_powersetCard zero_ne_one),
powersetCard_zero, powersetCard_one, sum_singleton, Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_map,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Finset.piecewise_singleton, linearDeriv_apply, add_comm]
open Finset in
/-- This expresses the difference between the values of a multilinear map
at two points "close to `x`" in terms of the "derivative" of the multilinear map at `x`
and of "second-order" terms. -/
lemma map_add_sub_map_add_sub_linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h h' : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) - f (x + h') - f.linearDeriv x (h - h') =
∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, (f (s.piecewise h x) - f (s.piecewise h' x)) := by
simp_rw [map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, sub_self, zero_add,
← LinearMap.map_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, sum_sub_distrib]
end AddCommGroup
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂]
/-- When `ι` is finite, multilinear maps on `R^ι` with values in `M₂` are in bijection with `M₂`,
as such a multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of ones.
We register this bijection as a linear equivalence in `MultilinearMap.piRingEquiv`. -/
protected def piRingEquiv [Fintype ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ where
toFun z := MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z
invFun f := f fun _ => 1
map_add' z z' := by
ext m
simp [smul_add]
map_smul' c z := by
ext m
simp [smul_smul, mul_comm]
left_inv z := by simp
right_inv f := f.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
end CommSemiring
section Submodule
variable [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M'] [Module R M₂]
/-- The pushforward of an indexed collection of submodule `p i ⊆ M₁ i` by `f : M₁ → M₂`.
Note that this is not a submodule - it is not closed under addition. -/
def map [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : ∀ i, Submodule R (M₁ i)) :
SubMulAction R M₂ where
carrier := f '' { v | ∀ i, v i ∈ p i }
smul_mem' := fun c _ ⟨x, hx, hf⟩ => by
let ⟨i⟩ := ‹Nonempty ι›
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine ⟨update x i (c • x i), fun j => if hij : j = i then ?_ else ?_, hf ▸ ?_⟩
· rw [hij, update_self]
exact (p i).smul_mem _ (hx i)
· rw [update_of_ne hij]
exact hx j
· rw [f.map_update_smul, update_eq_self]
/-- The map is always nonempty. This lemma is needed to apply `SubMulAction.zero_mem`. -/
theorem map_nonempty [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : ∀ i, Submodule R (M₁ i)) :
(map f p : Set M₂).Nonempty :=
⟨f 0, 0, fun i => (p i).zero_mem, rfl⟩
/-- The range of a multilinear map, closed under scalar multiplication. -/
def range [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : SubMulAction R M₂ :=
f.map fun _ => ⊤
end Submodule
end MultilinearMap
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,535 | 1,538 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SSameSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sSameSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.wSameSide.trans_sSameSide hyz, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem SSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.wSameSide.trans_wOppSide hyz hxy.2.2
theorem SSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem WOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_wOppSide hxy.symm hy).symm
theorem WOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wSameSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hyz
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h ▸ hp₂)
theorem WOppSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WSameSide x y ∧ s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ y ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ho⟩
rw [wOppSide_comm] at ho
by_contra h
rw [not_or] at h
exact h.1 (wOppSide_self_iff.1 (hs.trans_wOppSide ho h.2))
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_left_mem y h, wOppSide_of_left_mem y h⟩
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_right_mem x h, wOppSide_of_right_mem x h⟩
theorem WSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h, ho.1⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact ho.2.1 hx
· exact ho.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.WOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h.1, ho⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact h.2.1 hx
· exact h.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y :=
fun ho => h.not_wOppSide ho.1
theorem WOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_wOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.WSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_sOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => h.not_wSameSide hs.1
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, Wbtw R x p y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨p, hp, h⟩ => h.wOppSide₁₃ hp⟩
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h]
exact ⟨p₁, hp₁, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [← h]
exact ⟨p₂, hp₂, wbtw_self_right _ _ _⟩
· refine ⟨lineMap x y (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)), ?_, ?_⟩
· have : (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (y -ᵥ p₂ + (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) - (x -ᵥ p₁)) + (x -ᵥ p₁) =
(r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ y]
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) (r₁ + r₂)⁻¹ • h
rw [lineMap_apply, ← vsub_vadd x p₁, ← vsub_vadd y p₂, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc,
← vadd_assoc, vadd_eq_add, this]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _
⟨by positivity,
div_le_one_of_le₀ (le_add_of_nonneg_left hr₁.le) (Left.add_pos hr₁ hr₂).le⟩
theorem SOppSide.exists_sbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
∃ p ∈ s, Sbtw R x p y := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hw⟩ := wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw.1 h.wOppSide
refine ⟨p, hp, hw, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.1 hp
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.2 hp
theorem _root_.Sbtw.sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P}
(h : Sbtw R x y z) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : s.SOppSide x z := by
refine ⟨h.wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ hy, hx, fun hz => hx ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rw [lineMap_apply] at hy
have ht : t ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
simp [lineMap_apply] at hyz
have hy' := vsub_mem_direction hy hz
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, ← neg_one_smul R (z -ᵥ x), ← add_smul,
← sub_eq_add_neg, s.direction.smul_mem_iff (sub_ne_zero_of_ne ht)] at hy'
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy')] at hy
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne.symm,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sSameSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sOppSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ici 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ici]
constructor
· rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, (div_pos hr₁ hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ioi 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ioi]
constructor
· rw [sSameSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, div_pos hr₁ hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iic 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iic]
constructor
· rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, (div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iio 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iio]
constructor
· rw [sOppSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem wOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) :=
(wbtw_pointReflection R _ _).wOppSide₁₃ hx
theorem sOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) :
s.SOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) := by
refine (sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne R fun h => hy ?_).sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem hy hx
rwa [← h]
end LinearOrderedField
section Normed
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [PseudoMetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
theorem isConnected_setOf_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (x : P) (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
IsConnected { y | s.WSameSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [wSameSide_of_left_mem, hx]
have := AddTorsor.connectedSpace V P
exact isConnected_univ
· rw [setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Ici.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_wSameSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.WSameSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_wSameSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_wSameSide x h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {x : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : IsConnected { y | s.SSameSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
rw [setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Ioi.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_sSameSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.SSameSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_sSameSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, SSameSide, not_true, false_and, and_false]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_sSameSide hx h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (x : P) (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
IsConnected { y | s.WOppSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [wOppSide_of_left_mem, hx]
have := AddTorsor.connectedSpace V P
| exact isConnected_univ
· rw [setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Iic.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_wOppSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.WOppSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_wOppSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_wOppSide x h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {x : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : IsConnected { y | s.SOppSide x y } := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 785 | 800 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
theorem arccos_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arccos x = 0 := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_one_le hx, sub_self]
theorem arccos_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arccos x = π := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx, sub_neg_eq_add, add_halves]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem sin_arccos (x : ℝ) : sin (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arccos_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, sin_pi, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arccos_of_one_le hx₂.le, sin_zero, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
rw [arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_arcsin]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arccos x < π / 2 ↔ 0 < x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_four {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 4 ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [arccos, ← pi_div_four_le_arcsin]
constructor <;>
· intro
linarith
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arccos : Continuous arccos :=
continuous_const.sub continuous_arcsin
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arccos (x : ℝ) : tan (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) / x := by
rw [arccos, tan_pi_div_two_sub, tan_arcsin, inv_div]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arccos_eq_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arccos x = arcsin (√(1 - x ^ 2)) :=
(arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arccos _)
⟨(Left.neg_nonpos_iff.2 (div_nonneg pi_pos.le (by norm_num))).trans (arccos_nonneg _),
arccos_le_pi_div_two.2 h⟩).symm
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arcsin_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arcsin x = arccos (√(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw [eq_comm, ← cos_arcsin]
exact
arccos_cos (arcsin_nonneg.2 h)
((arcsin_le_pi_div_two _).trans (div_le_self pi_pos.le one_le_two))
end Real
open Real
/-!
### Convenience dot notation lemmas
-/
namespace Filter.Tendsto
variable {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ} {f : α → ℝ}
protected theorem arcsin (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arcsin x)) :=
(continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).comp h
theorem arcsin_nhdsLE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≤] x)) :
Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≤] (arcsin x)) := by
refine ((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun y hy ↦ ?_).comp h
exact monotone_arcsin hy
theorem arcsin_nhdsGE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≥] x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≥] (arcsin x)) :=
((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun _ ↦ arcsin_le_arcsin).comp h
protected theorem arccos (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arccos x)) :=
(continuous_arccos.tendsto _).comp h
theorem arccos_nhdsLE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≤] x)) : Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝[≥] (arccos x)) :=
((continuous_arccos.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos).comp h
theorem arccos_nhdsGE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≥] x)) :
Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝[≤] (arccos x)) := by
refine ((continuous_arccos.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun y hy ↦ ?_).comp h
simp only [mem_Ici, mem_Iic] at hy ⊢
exact antitone_arccos hy
end Filter.Tendsto
|
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → ℝ} {s : Set X} {x : X}
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.arcsin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (arcsin <| f ·) s x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 444 | 448 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
| theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 630 | 631 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion.
We call this `opow` in theorems in order to disambiguate from other exponentials. -/
instance instPow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b ↦ if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2⟩
private theorem opow_of_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b =
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2 :=
if_neg h
/-- `0 ^ a = 1` if `a = 0` and `0 ^ a = 0` otherwise. -/
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
if_pos rfl
theorem zero_opow_le (a : Ordinal) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [zero_opow']
exact sub_le_self 1 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero b), mul_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_succ]
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = ⨆ x : Iio b, a ^ x.1 := by
simp_rw [opow_of_ne_zero ha, limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ hb]
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by
rw [opow_limit a0 h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall]
rfl
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]
simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]
simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero]
| succ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| isLimit b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => exact h0
| succ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| isLimit b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
@[simp]
theorem opow_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ^ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp
· simp [hb]
· simp [opow_ne_zero b ha, ha]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem opow_natCast (a : Ordinal) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n : Ordinal) = a ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n IH => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ, pow_succ, IH]
theorem isNormal_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).lt_iff
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_iff
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).inj
theorem isLimit_opow {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(isNormal_opow a1).isLimit
theorem isLimit_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact isLimit_mul (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact isLimit_opow l.one_lt l'
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| succ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| isLimit c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
theorem opow_le_opow {a b c d : Ordinal} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : a ^ b ≤ c ^ d :=
| (opow_le_opow_left b hac).trans (opow_le_opow_right hc hbd)
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
rcases le_or_gt a 1 with a1 | a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 165 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ']
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
theorem card_image₂_iff :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_mem_image2]
lemma exists_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, exists_mem_image2]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image₂_iff := forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image₂
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_left : image₂ f {a} t = t.image fun b => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_right : image₂ f s {b} = s.image fun a => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image₂_singleton_left' : image₂ f {a} t = t.image (f a) :=
image₂_singleton_left
theorem image₂_singleton : image₂ f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
theorem image₂_union_left [DecidableEq α] : image₂ f (s ∪ s') t = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_left
theorem image₂_union_right [DecidableEq β] : image₂ f s (t ∪ t') = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (insert a s) t = (t.image fun b => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (insert b t) = (s.image fun a => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_right
theorem image₂_inter_left [DecidableEq α] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_left hf
theorem image₂_inter_right [DecidableEq β] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_right hf
theorem image₂_inter_subset_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_left
theorem image₂_inter_subset_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_right
theorem image₂_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_congr h
/-- A common special case of `image₂_congr` -/
theorem image₂_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
image₂_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
variable (s t)
theorem card_image₂_singleton_left (hf : Injective (f a)) : #(image₂ f {a} t) = #t := by
rw [image₂_singleton_left, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem card_image₂_singleton_right (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
#(image₂ f s {b}) = #s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem image₂_singleton_inter [DecidableEq β] (t₁ t₂ : Finset β) (hf : Injective (f a)) :
image₂ f {a} (t₁ ∩ t₂) = image₂ f {a} t₁ ∩ image₂ f {a} t₂ := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_left, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem image₂_inter_singleton [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
image₂ f (s₁ ∩ s₂) {b} = image₂ f s₁ {b} ∩ image₂ f s₂ {b} := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_right, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem card_le_card_image₂_left {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hf : ∀ a, Injective (f a)) :
#t ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_left _ (hf a)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_right <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)
theorem card_le_card_image₂_right {t : Finset β} (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hf : ∀ b, Injective fun a => f a b) : #s ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_right _ (hf b)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_left <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hb)
variable {s t}
theorem biUnion_image_left : (s.biUnion fun a => t.image <| f a) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_left _
theorem biUnion_image_right : (t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_right _
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Finset.image₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `image₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `image₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`image₂ (*) f g = image₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
section
variable [DecidableEq δ]
theorem image_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2 _ _
theorem image₂_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = image₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_left _ _
theorem image₂_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = image₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_mk_eq_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := by ext; simp [Prod.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ (curry f) s t = (s ×ˢ t).image f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_uncurry_product (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry f) = image₂ f s t := rfl
theorem image₂_swap (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ f s t = image₂ (fun a b => f b a) t s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_swap _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_left [DecidableEq α] (h : t.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun x _ => x) s t = s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left h
@[simp]
theorem image₂_right [DecidableEq β] (h : s.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun _ y => y) s t = t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_right h
theorem image₂_assoc {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ}
{f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε}
{g' : β → γ → ε'} (h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ f' s (image₂ g' t u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_assoc h_assoc
theorem image₂_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : image₂ f s t = image₂ g t s :=
(image₂_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
theorem image₂_left_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε} (h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
image₂ f s (image₂ g t u) = image₂ g' t (image₂ f' s u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left_comm h_left_comm
theorem image₂_right_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : δ' → β → ε} (h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f' a c) b) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ g' (image₂ f' s u) t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_right_comm h_right_comm
theorem image₂_image₂_image₂_comm {γ δ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {v : Finset δ} [DecidableEq ζ]
[DecidableEq ζ'] [DecidableEq ν] {f : ε → ζ → ν} {g : α → β → ε} {h : γ → δ → ζ}
{f' : ε' → ζ' → ν} {g' : α → γ → ε'} {h' : β → δ → ζ'}
(h_comm : ∀ a b c d, f (g a b) (h c d) = f' (g' a c) (h' b d)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) (image₂ h u v) = image₂ f' (image₂ g' s u) (image₂ h' t v) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image2_image2_comm h_comm
theorem image_image₂_distrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β' → δ} {g₁ : α → α'} {g₂ : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ a) (g₂ b)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (s.image g₁) (t.image g₂) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image₂_image_left_comm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_distrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' a) b) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (s.image g') t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib_left h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_right_comm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_distrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : α → β' → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' a (g' b)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' s (t.image g') :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib_right h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_distrib_left`. -/
theorem image₂_image_left_comm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' a b)) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = (image₂ f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image₂_distrib_left fun a b => (h_left_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_distrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image₂_right_comm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' a b)) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = (image₂ f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image₂_distrib_right fun a b => (h_right_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `s`-`s` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image₂_distrib_subset_left {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ}
{f₁ : α → β → β'} {f₂ : α → γ → γ'} {g' : β' → γ' → ε}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' (f₁ a b) (f₂ a c)) :
image₂ f s (image₂ g t u) ⊆ image₂ g' (image₂ f₁ s t) (image₂ f₂ s u) :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_distrib_subset_left h_distrib
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `u`-`u` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image₂_distrib_subset_right {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ}
{f₁ : α → γ → α'} {f₂ : β → γ → β'} {g' : α' → β' → ε}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f₁ a c) (f₂ b c)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u ⊆ image₂ g' (image₂ f₁ s u) (image₂ f₂ t u) :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_distrib_subset_right h_distrib
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α' → δ} {g₁ : β → β'} {g₂ : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ b) (g₂ a)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (t.image g₁) (s.image g₂) := by
rw [image₂_swap f]
exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ => h_antidistrib _ _
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image₂_image_left_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' b) a) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (t.image g') s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_antidistrib_left h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_right_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : β → α' → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' b (g' a)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' t (s.image g') :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_antidistrib_right h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_antidistrib_left`. -/
theorem image₂_image_left_anticomm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_anticomm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' b a)) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = (image₂ f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image₂_antidistrib_left fun a b => (h_left_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_antidistrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image₂_right_anticomm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_anticomm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' b a)) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = (image₂ f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image₂_antidistrib_right fun a b => (h_right_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- If `a` is a left identity for `f : α → β → β`, then `{a}` is a left identity for
`Finset.image₂ f`. -/
theorem image₂_left_identity {f : α → γ → γ} {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f a b = b) (t : Finset γ) :
image₂ f {a} t = t :=
coe_injective <| by rw [coe_image₂, coe_singleton, Set.image2_left_identity h]
/-- If `b` is a right identity for `f : α → β → α`, then `{b}` is a right identity for
`Finset.image₂ f`. -/
theorem image₂_right_identity {f : γ → β → γ} {b : β} (h : ∀ a, f a b = a) (s : Finset γ) :
image₂ f s {b} = s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, funext h, image_id']
/-- If each partial application of `f` is injective, and images of `s` under those partial
applications are disjoint (but not necessarily distinct!), then the size of `t` divides the size of
`Finset.image₂ f s t`. -/
theorem card_dvd_card_image₂_right (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Injective (f a))
(hs : ((fun a => t.image <| f a) '' s).PairwiseDisjoint id) : #t ∣ #(image₂ f s t) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s _ ih
· simp
specialize ih (forall_of_forall_insert hf)
(hs.subset <| Set.image_subset _ <| coe_subset.2 <| subset_insert _ _)
rw [image₂_insert_left]
by_cases h : Disjoint (image (f a) t) (image₂ f s t)
· rw [card_union_of_disjoint h]
exact Nat.dvd_add (card_image_of_injective _ <| hf _ <| mem_insert_self _ _).symm.dvd ih
simp_rw [← biUnion_image_left, disjoint_biUnion_right, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨b, hb, h⟩ := h
rwa [union_eq_right.2]
exact (hs.eq (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_insert_self _ _)
(Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_insert_of_mem hb) h).trans_subset
(image_subset_image₂_right hb)
/-- If each partial application of `f` is injective, and images of `t` under those partial
applications are disjoint (but not necessarily distinct!), then the size of `s` divides the size of
`Finset.image₂ f s t`. -/
theorem card_dvd_card_image₂_left (hf : ∀ b ∈ t, Injective fun a => f a b)
(ht : ((fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) '' t).PairwiseDisjoint id) :
#s ∣ #(image₂ f s t) := by rw [← image₂_swap]; exact card_dvd_card_image₂_right hf ht
/-- If a `Finset` is a subset of the image of two `Set`s under a binary operation,
then it is a subset of the `Finset.image₂` of two `Finset` subsets of these `Set`s. -/
theorem subset_set_image₂ {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hu : ↑u ⊆ image2 f s t) :
∃ (s' : Finset α) (t' : Finset β), ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← Set.image_prod, subset_set_image_iff] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
classical
use u.image Prod.fst, u.image Prod.snd
simp only [coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff, image₂_image_left, image₂_image_right,
image_subset_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ h ↦ (hu h).1, fun _ h ↦ (hu h).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_image₂_of_mem hx hx⟩
end
section UnionInter
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
theorem image₂_inter_union_subset_union :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') (t ∪ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_inter_union_subset_union
theorem image₂_union_inter_subset_union :
image₂ f (s ∪ s') (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_union_inter_subset_union
theorem image₂_inter_union_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Finset α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image₂ f (s ∩ t) (s ∪ t) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_union_subset hf
theorem image₂_union_inter_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Finset α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image₂ f (s ∪ t) (s ∩ t) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_inter_subset hf
end UnionInter
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup δ]
@[simp (default + 1)] -- otherwise `simp` doesn't use `forall_mem_image₂`
lemma sup'_image₂_le {g : γ → δ} {a : δ} (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
sup' (image₂ f s t) h g ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, g (f x y) ≤ a := by
rw [sup'_le_iff, forall_mem_image₂]
lemma sup'_image₂_left (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
sup' (image₂ f s t) h g =
sup' s h.of_image₂_left fun x ↦ sup' t h.of_image₂_right (g <| f x ·) := by
simp only [image₂, sup'_image, sup'_product_left]; rfl
lemma sup'_image₂_right (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
sup' (image₂ f s t) h g =
sup' t h.of_image₂_right fun y ↦ sup' s h.of_image₂_left (g <| f · y) := by
simp only [image₂, sup'_image, sup'_product_right]; rfl
variable [OrderBot δ]
@[simp (default + 1)] -- otherwise `simp` doesn't use `forall_mem_image₂`
lemma sup_image₂_le {g : γ → δ} {a : δ} :
sup (image₂ f s t) g ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, g (f x y) ≤ a := by
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff, forall_mem_image₂]
variable (s t)
lemma sup_image₂_left (g : γ → δ) : sup (image₂ f s t) g = sup s fun x ↦ sup t (g <| f x ·) := by
simp only [image₂, sup_image, sup_product_left]; rfl
lemma sup_image₂_right (g : γ → δ) : sup (image₂ f s t) g = sup t fun y ↦ sup s (g <| f · y) := by
simp only [image₂, sup_image, sup_product_right]; rfl
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf δ]
@[simp (default + 1)] -- otherwise `simp` doesn't use `forall_mem_image₂`
lemma le_inf'_image₂ {g : γ → δ} {a : δ} (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
a ≤ inf' (image₂ f s t) h g ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, a ≤ g (f x y) := by
rw [le_inf'_iff, forall_mem_image₂]
lemma inf'_image₂_left (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
inf' (image₂ f s t) h g =
inf' s h.of_image₂_left fun x ↦ inf' t h.of_image₂_right (g <| f x ·) :=
sup'_image₂_left (δ := δᵒᵈ) g h
lemma inf'_image₂_right (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
inf' (image₂ f s t) h g =
inf' t h.of_image₂_right fun y ↦ inf' s h.of_image₂_left (g <| f · y) :=
sup'_image₂_right (δ := δᵒᵈ) g h
variable [OrderTop δ]
@[simp (default + 1)] -- otherwise `simp` doesn't use `forall_mem_image₂`
lemma le_inf_image₂ {g : γ → δ} {a : δ} :
a ≤ inf (image₂ f s t) g ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, a ≤ g (f x y) :=
sup_image₂_le (δ := δᵒᵈ)
variable (s t)
lemma inf_image₂_left (g : γ → δ) : inf (image₂ f s t) g = inf s fun x ↦ inf t (g ∘ f x) :=
sup_image₂_left (δ := δᵒᵈ) ..
lemma inf_image₂_right (g : γ → δ) : inf (image₂ f s t) g = inf t fun y ↦ inf s (g <| f · y) :=
sup_image₂_right (δ := δᵒᵈ) ..
end SemilatticeInf
|
end Finset
open Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 579 | 582 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Alexey Soloyev, Junyan Xu, Kamila Szewczyk
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.LinearRecurrence
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.NatFib
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Prime
/-!
# The golden ratio and its conjugate
This file defines the golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2` and its conjugate
`ψ := (1 - √5)/2`, which are the two real roots of `X² - X - 1`.
Along with various computational facts about them, we prove their
irrationality, and we link them to the Fibonacci sequence by proving
Binet's formula.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
/-- The golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenRatio : ℝ := (1 + √5) / 2
/-- The conjugate of the golden ratio `ψ := (1 - √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenConj : ℝ := (1 - √5) / 2
@[inherit_doc goldenRatio] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "φ" => goldenRatio
@[inherit_doc goldenConj] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "ψ" => goldenConj
open Real goldenRatio
/-- The inverse of the golden ratio is the opposite of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_gold : φ⁻¹ = -ψ := by
have : 1 + √5 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (add_pos (by norm_num) <| Real.sqrt_pos.mpr (by norm_num))
field_simp [sub_mul, mul_add]
norm_num
/-- The opposite of the golden ratio is the inverse of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_goldConj : ψ⁻¹ = -φ := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← neg_inv, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact inv_gold.symm
@[simp]
theorem gold_mul_goldConj : φ * ψ = -1 := by
field_simp
rw [← sq_sub_sq]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem goldConj_mul_gold : ψ * φ = -1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact gold_mul_goldConj
@[simp]
theorem gold_add_goldConj : φ + ψ = 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, goldenConj]
ring
theorem one_sub_goldConj : 1 - φ = ψ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
theorem one_sub_gold : 1 - ψ = φ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
@[simp]
theorem gold_sub_goldConj : φ - ψ = √5 := by ring
|
theorem gold_pow_sub_gold_pow (n : ℕ) : φ ^ (n + 2) - φ ^ (n + 1) = φ ^ n := by
| Mathlib/Data/Real/GoldenRatio.lean | 75 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
/-!
# Union lift
This file defines `Set.iUnionLift` to glue together functions defined on each of a collection of
sets to make a function on the Union of those sets.
## Main definitions
* `Set.iUnionLift` - Given a Union of sets `iUnion S`, define a function on any subset of the Union
by defining it on each component, and proving that it agrees on the intersections.
* `Set.liftCover` - Version of `Set.iUnionLift` for the special case that the sets cover the
entire type.
## Main statements
There are proofs of the obvious properties of `iUnionLift`, i.e. what it does to elements of
each of the sets in the `iUnion`, stated in different ways.
There are also three lemmas about `iUnionLift` intended to aid with proving that `iUnionLift` is a
homomorphism when defined on a Union of substructures. There is one lemma each to show that
constants, unary functions, or binary functions are preserved. These lemmas are:
*`Set.iUnionLift_const`
*`Set.iUnionLift_unary`
*`Set.iUnionLift_binary`
## Tags
directed union, directed supremum, glue, gluing
-/
variable {α : Type*} {ι β : Sort _}
namespace Set
section UnionLift
/- The unused argument is left in the definition so that the `simp` lemmas
`iUnionLift_inclusion` will work without the user having to provide it explicitly to
simplify terms involving `iUnionLift`. -/
/-- Given a union of sets `iUnion S`, define a function on the Union by defining
it on each component, and proving that it agrees on the intersections. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
noncomputable def iUnionLift (S : ι → Set α) (f : ∀ i, S i → β)
(_ : ∀ (i j) (x : α) (hxi : x ∈ S i) (hxj : x ∈ S j), f i ⟨x, hxi⟩ = f j ⟨x, hxj⟩) (T : Set α)
(hT : T ⊆ iUnion S) (x : T) : β :=
let i := Classical.indefiniteDescription _ (mem_iUnion.1 (hT x.prop))
f i ⟨x, i.prop⟩
variable {S : ι → Set α} {f : ∀ i, S i → β}
{hf : ∀ (i j) (x : α) (hxi : x ∈ S i) (hxj : x ∈ S j), f i ⟨x, hxi⟩ = f j ⟨x, hxj⟩} {T : Set α}
{hT : T ⊆ iUnion S} (hT' : T = iUnion S)
@[simp]
theorem iUnionLift_mk {i : ι} (x : S i) (hx : (x : α) ∈ T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT ⟨x, hx⟩ = f i x := hf _ i x _ _
theorem iUnionLift_inclusion {i : ι} (x : S i) (h : S i ⊆ T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT (Set.inclusion h x) = f i x :=
iUnionLift_mk x _
theorem iUnionLift_of_mem (x : T) {i : ι} (hx : (x : α) ∈ S i) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT x = f i ⟨x, hx⟩ := by obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x; exact hf _ _ _ _ _
theorem preimage_iUnionLift (t : Set β) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT ⁻¹' t =
inclusion hT ⁻¹' (⋃ i, inclusion (subset_iUnion S i) '' (f i ⁻¹' t)) := by
| ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_image]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/UnionLift.lean | 75 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# The partial recursive functions
The partial recursive functions are defined similarly to the primitive
recursive functions, but now all functions are partial, implemented
using the `Part` monad, and there is an additional operation, called
μ-recursion, which performs unbounded minimization: `μ f` returns the
least natural number `n` for which `f n = 0`, or diverges if such `n` doesn't exist.
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for functions `f : ℕ →. ℕ`
- `Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for partial functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Computable f`: `f` is partial recursive, for total functions between `Primcodable` types
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable Part
attribute [-simp] not_forall
namespace Nat
section Rfind
variable (p : ℕ →. Bool)
private def lbp (m n : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n + 1 ∧ ∀ k ≤ n, false ∈ p k
private def wf_lbp (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom) : WellFounded (lbp p) :=
⟨by
let ⟨n, pn⟩ := H
suffices ∀ m k, n ≤ k + m → Acc (lbp p) k by exact fun a => this _ _ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
intro m k kn
induction' m with m IH generalizing k <;> refine ⟨_, fun y r => ?_⟩ <;> rcases r with ⟨rfl, a⟩
· injection mem_unique pn.1 (a _ kn)
· exact IH _ (by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; exact kn)⟩
variable (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a subtype. -/
def rfindX : { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } :=
suffices ∀ k, (∀ n < k, false ∈ p n) → { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } from
this 0 fun _ => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim
@WellFounded.fix _ _ (lbp p) (wf_lbp p H)
(by
intro m IH al
have pm : (p m).Dom := by
rcases H with ⟨n, h₁, h₂⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h₃ | h₃ | h₃)
· exact h₂ _ h₃
· rw [h₃]
exact h₁.fst
· injection mem_unique h₁ (al _ h₃)
cases e : (p m).get pm
· suffices ∀ᵉ k ≤ m, false ∈ p k from IH _ ⟨rfl, this⟩ fun n h => this _ (le_of_lt_succ h)
intro n h
rcases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h | h
· exact al _ h
· rw [h]
exact ⟨_, e⟩
· exact ⟨m, ⟨_, e⟩, al⟩)
end Rfind
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfind (p : ℕ →. Bool) : Part ℕ :=
⟨_, fun h => (rfindX p h).1⟩
theorem rfind_spec {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : true ∈ p n :=
h.snd ▸ (rfindX p h.fst).2.1
theorem rfind_min {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
@(h.snd ▸ @((rfindX p h.fst).2.2))
@[simp]
theorem rfind_dom {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → (p m).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rfind_dom' {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m ≤ n → (p m).Dom :=
exists_congr fun _ =>
and_congr_right fun pn =>
⟨fun H _ h => (Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le h).elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ pn.fst) (H _), fun H _ h =>
H (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rfind {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} :
n ∈ rfind p ↔ true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
⟨fun h => ⟨rfind_spec h, @rfind_min _ _ h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨_, h₁, fun {m} mn => (h₂ mn).fst⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | h | h)
· injection mem_unique (h₂ h) (rfind_spec hm)
· rwa [← h]
· injection mem_unique h₁ (rfind_min hm h)⟩
theorem rfind_min' {p : ℕ → Bool} {m : ℕ} (pm : p m) : ∃ n ∈ rfind p, n ≤ m :=
have : true ∈ (p : ℕ →. Bool) m := ⟨trivial, pm⟩
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨m, this, fun {_} _ => ⟨⟩⟩
⟨n, hn, not_lt.1 fun h => by injection mem_unique this (rfind_min hn h)⟩
theorem rfind_zero_none (p : ℕ →. Bool) (p0 : p 0 = Part.none) : rfind p = Part.none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h =>
let ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := rfind_dom'.1 h.fst
(p0 ▸ h₂ (zero_le _) : (@Part.none Bool).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `f n`, where all `f k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfindOpt {α} (f : ℕ → Option α) : Part α :=
(rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).bind fun n => f n
theorem rfindOpt_spec {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} {a} (h : a ∈ rfindOpt f) : ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
let ⟨n, _, h₂⟩ := mem_bind_iff.1 h
⟨n, mem_coe.1 h₂⟩
theorem rfindOpt_dom {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} : (rfindOpt f).Dom ↔ ∃ n a, a ∈ f n :=
⟨fun h => (rfindOpt_spec ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp fun _ h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun h => by
have h' : ∃ n, (f n).isSome := h.imp fun n => Option.isSome_iff_exists.2
have s := Nat.find_spec h'
have fd : (rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).Dom :=
⟨Nat.find h', by simpa using s.symm, fun _ _ => trivial⟩
refine ⟨fd, ?_⟩
have := rfind_spec (get_mem fd)
simpa using this⟩
theorem rfindOpt_mono {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} (H : ∀ {a m n}, m ≤ n → a ∈ f m → a ∈ f n) {a} :
a ∈ rfindOpt f ↔ ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
⟨rfindOpt_spec, fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
have h' := rfindOpt_dom.2 ⟨_, _, h⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := rfindOpt_spec ⟨h', rfl⟩
have := (H (le_max_left _ _) h).symm.trans (H (le_max_right _ _) hk)
simp at this; simp [this, get_mem]⟩
/-- `Partrec f` means that the partial function `f : ℕ → ℕ` is partially recursive. -/
inductive Partrec : (ℕ →. ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Partrec (pure 0)
| succ : Partrec succ
| left : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => pair <$> f n <*> g n
| comp {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => g n >>= f
| prec {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec (unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (f a) fun y IH => do let i ← IH; g (pair a (pair y i)))
| rfind {f} : Partrec f → Partrec fun a => rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (pair a n)
namespace Partrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : ℕ →. ℕ} {g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Partrec g :=
hf.of_eq fun n => eq_some_iff.2 (H n)
theorem of_primrec {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Partrec f := by
induction hf with
| zero => exact zero
| succ => exact succ
| left => exact left
| right => exact right
| pair _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.pair pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp [Seq.seq]
| comp _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.comp pg).of_eq_tot fun n => (by simp)
| prec _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.prec pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp only [unpaired, PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind]
induction n.unpair.2 with
| zero => simp
| succ m IH =>
simp only [mem_bind_iff, mem_some_iff]
exact ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩
protected theorem some : Partrec some :=
of_primrec Primrec.id
theorem none : Partrec fun _ => none :=
(of_primrec (Nat.Primrec.const 1)).rfind.of_eq fun _ =>
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => by simp at h
theorem prec' {f g h} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) (hh : Partrec h) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind fun n => n.rec (g a)
fun y IH => do {let i ← IH; h (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))} :=
((prec hg hh).comp (pair Partrec.some hf)).of_eq fun a =>
ext fun s => by simp [Seq.seq]
theorem ppred : Partrec fun n => ppred n :=
have : Primrec₂ fun n m => if n = Nat.succ m then 0 else 1 :=
(Primrec.ite
(@PrimrecRel.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Primrec.eq Primrec.fst (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp Primrec.snd))
(_root_.Primrec.const 0) (_root_.Primrec.const 1)).to₂
(of_primrec (Primrec₂.unpaired'.2 this)).rfind.of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
· exact
eq_none_iff.2 fun a ⟨⟨m, h, _⟩, _⟩ => by
simp [show 0 ≠ m.succ by intro h; injection h] at h
· refine eq_some_iff.2 ?_
simp only [mem_rfind, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff, decide_true, mem_some_iff,
false_eq_decide_iff, true_and]
intro m h
simp [ne_of_gt h]
end Partrec
end Nat
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α →. σ) :=
Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := α) n) fun a => (f a).map encode
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β →. σ) :=
Partrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- Computable functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types:
a function is computable if and only if it is partially recursive (as a partial function) -/
def Computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → σ) :=
Partrec (f : α →. σ)
/-- Computable functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Computable₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
theorem Primrec.to_comp {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) :
Computable f :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp (Nat.Partrec.of_primrec hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp; cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
nonrec theorem Primrec₂.to_comp {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Computable₂ f :=
hf.to_comp
protected theorem Computable.partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ}
(hf : Computable f) : Partrec (f : α →. σ) :=
hf
protected theorem Computable₂.partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) : Partrec₂ fun a => (f a : β →. σ) :=
hf
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Computable f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Computable g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (s : σ) : Computable fun _ : α => s :=
(Primrec.const _).to_comp
theorem ofOption {f : α → Option β} (hf : Computable f) : Partrec fun a => (f a : Part β) :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => by
rcases decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp
rcases f a with - | b <;> simp
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Computable f) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
protected theorem id : Computable (@id α) :=
Primrec.id.to_comp
theorem fst : Computable (@Prod.fst α β) :=
Primrec.fst.to_comp
theorem snd : Computable (@Prod.snd α β) :=
Primrec.snd.to_comp
nonrec theorem pair {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a, g a) :=
(hf.pair hg).of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp [Seq.seq]
theorem unpair : Computable Nat.unpair :=
Primrec.unpair.to_comp
theorem succ : Computable Nat.succ :=
Primrec.succ.to_comp
theorem pred : Computable Nat.pred :=
Primrec.pred.to_comp
theorem nat_bodd : Computable Nat.bodd :=
Primrec.nat_bodd.to_comp
theorem nat_div2 : Computable Nat.div2 :=
Primrec.nat_div2.to_comp
theorem sumInl : Computable (@Sum.inl α β) :=
Primrec.sumInl.to_comp
theorem sumInr : Computable (@Sum.inr α β) :=
Primrec.sumInr.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Computable.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Computable.sumInr
theorem list_cons : Computable₂ (@List.cons α) :=
Primrec.list_cons.to_comp
theorem list_reverse : Computable (@List.reverse α) :=
Primrec.list_reverse.to_comp
theorem list_getElem? : Computable₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
Primrec.list_getElem?.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_append : Computable₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
Primrec.list_append.to_comp
theorem list_concat : Computable₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
Primrec.list_concat.to_comp
theorem list_length : Computable (@List.length α) :=
Primrec.list_length.to_comp
theorem vector_cons {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.cons α n) :=
Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp
theorem vector_toList {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.toList α n) :=
Primrec.vector_toList.to_comp
theorem vector_length {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.length α n) :=
Primrec.vector_length.to_comp
theorem vector_head {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.head α n) :=
Primrec.vector_head.to_comp
theorem vector_tail {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.tail α n) :=
Primrec.vector_tail.to_comp
theorem vector_get {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
Primrec.vector_get.to_comp
theorem vector_ofFn' {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.ofFn α n) :=
Primrec.vector_ofFn'.to_comp
theorem fin_app {n} : Computable₂ (@id (Fin n → σ)) :=
Primrec.fin_app.to_comp
protected theorem encode : Computable (@encode α _) :=
Primrec.encode.to_comp
protected theorem decode : Computable (decode (α := α)) :=
Primrec.decode.to_comp
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Computable (ofNat α) :=
(Primrec.ofNat _).to_comp
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem option_some : Computable (@Option.some α) :=
Primrec.option_some.to_comp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem of_eq {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : α →. σ} {g : α → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Computable g :=
hf.of_eq fun a => eq_some_iff.2 (H a)
theorem none : Partrec fun _ : α => @Part.none σ :=
Nat.Partrec.none.of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
protected theorem some : Partrec (@Part.some α) :=
Computable.id
theorem _root_.Decidable.Partrec.const' (s : Part σ) [Decidable s.Dom] : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
(Computable.ofOption (const (toOption s))).of_eq fun _ => of_toOption s
theorem const' (s : Part σ) : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
haveI := Classical.dec s.Dom
Decidable.Partrec.const' s
protected theorem bind {f : α →. β} {g : α → β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(hg.comp (Nat.Partrec.some.pair hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp [Seq.seq]; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem map {f : α →. β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
simpa [bind_some_eq_map] using Partrec.bind (g := fun a x => some (g a x)) hf hg
theorem to₂ {f : α × β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α →. σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ →. σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec g)
(hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).rec (g a) fun y IH => IH.bind fun i => h a (y, i) :=
(Nat.Partrec.prec' hf hg hh).of_eq fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e]
induction' f a with m IH <;> simp
rw [IH, Part.bind_map]
congr; funext s
simp [encodek]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β →. σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable g) :
Partrec fun a => f (g a) :=
(hf.comp hg).of_eq fun n => by simp; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec f := by simp [Partrec, map_id']
theorem map_encode_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map encode) ↔ Partrec f :=
Iff.rfl
end Partrec
namespace Partrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ →. α} : Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using Partrec.comp (g := fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.1, p.2)) h Primrec₂.pair.to_comp,
fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair.to_comp⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
Partrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ →. σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Partrec₂ f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable h) : Partrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ →. σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Partrec₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Partrec₂
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => f (g a) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
end Computable
namespace Computable₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Computable₂ f := hf
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Computable h) : Computable fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Computable₂
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem rfind {p : α → ℕ →. Bool} (hp : Partrec₂ p) : Partrec fun a => Nat.rfind (p a) :=
(Nat.Partrec.rfind <|
hp.map ((Primrec.dom_bool fun b => cond b 0 1).comp Primrec.snd).to₂.to_comp).of_eq
fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, Nat.rfind_zero_none, map_id']
congr; funext n
simp only [map_map, Function.comp]
refine map_id' (fun b => ?_) _
cases b <;> rfl
theorem rfindOpt {f : α → ℕ → Option σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) :
Partrec fun a => Nat.rfindOpt (f a) :=
(rfind (Primrec.option_isSome.to_comp.comp hf).partrec.to₂).bind (ofOption hf)
theorem nat_casesOn_right {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).casesOn (some (g a)) (h a) :=
(nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst (pred.comp <| hf.comp fst)).to₂).of_eq fun a => by
simp only [PFun.coe_val, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]; rcases f a with - | n <;> simp
refine ext fun b => ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· rcases mem_bind_iff.1 H with ⟨c, _, h₂⟩
exact h₂
· have : ∀ m, (Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => Part σ)
(Part.some (g a)) (fun y IH => IH.bind fun _ => h a n) m).Dom := by
intro m
induction m <;> simp [*, H.fst]
exact ⟨⟨this n, H.fst⟩, H.snd⟩
theorem bind_decode₂_iff {f : α →. σ} :
Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode₂ α n) fun a => (f a).map encode :=
⟨fun hf =>
nat_iff.1 <|
(Computable.ofOption Primrec.decode₂.to_comp).bind <|
(map hf (Computable.encode.comp snd).to₂).comp snd,
fun h =>
map_encode_iff.1 <| by simpa [encodek₂] using (nat_iff.2 h).comp (@Computable.encode α _)⟩
theorem vector_mOfFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α →. σ},
(∀ i, Partrec (f i)) → Partrec fun a : α => Vector.mOfFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => const _
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [Vector.mOfFn, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, pure_eq_some, bind_eq_bind]
exact
(hf 0).bind
(Partrec.bind ((vector_mOfFn fun i => hf i.succ).comp fst)
(Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))
end Partrec
@[simp]
theorem Vector.mOfFn_part_some {α n} :
∀ f : Fin n → α,
(List.Vector.mOfFn fun i => Part.some (f i)) = Part.some (List.Vector.ofFn f) :=
Vector.mOfFn_pure
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => Option.some (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| Primrec.pred.to_comp.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).bind (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f :=
⟨fun hf =>
Nat.Partrec.of_eq
(((Partrec.nat_iff.2
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp <| Nat.Partrec.of_primrec <| Primcodable.prim (α := β))).comp
snd).bind
(Computable.comp hf fst).to₂.partrec₂)
fun n => by
simp only [decode_prod_val, decode_nat, Option.map_some', PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind,
bind_some, Part.map_bind, map_some]
cases decode (α := α) n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases decode (α := β) n.unpair.2 <;> simp,
fun hf => by
have :
Partrec fun a : α × ℕ =>
(encode (decode (α := β) a.2)).casesOn (some Option.none)
fun n => Part.map (f a.1) (decode (α := β) n) :=
Partrec.nat_casesOn_right
(h := fun (a : α × ℕ) (n : ℕ) ↦ map (fun b ↦ f a.1 b) (Part.ofOption (decode n)))
(Primrec.encdec.to_comp.comp snd) (const Option.none)
((ofOption (Computable.decode.comp snd)).map (hf.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd).to₂)
refine this.of_eq fun a => ?_
simp; cases decode (α := β) a.2 <;> simp [encodek]⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).map (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f := by
convert (bind_decode_iff (f := fun a => Option.some ∘ f a)).trans option_some_iff
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => σ) (g a) (fun y IH => h a (y, IH)) (f a) :=
(Partrec.nat_rec hf hg hh.partrec₂).of_eq fun a => by simp; induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.casesOn (motive := fun _ => σ) (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst <| fst.comp snd).to₂
|
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Computable c) (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) : Computable fun a => cond (c a) (f a) (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
| Mathlib/Computability/Partrec.lean | 595 | 602 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
/-!
# The Chevalley–Warning theorem
This file contains a proof of the Chevalley–Warning theorem.
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
## Main results
1. Let `f` be a multivariate polynomial in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`)
such that the total degree of `f` is less than `(q-1)` times the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the evaluation of `f` on all points of `σ → K` (aka `K^σ`) sums to `0`.
(`sum_eval_eq_zero`)
2. The Chevalley–Warning theorem (`char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt`).
Let `f i` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) such that
the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i`
is divisible by the characteristic of `K`.
## Notation
- `K` is a finite field
- `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`
- `σ` is the indexing type for the variables of a multivariate polynomial ring over `K`
-/
universe u v
section FiniteField
open MvPolynomial
open Function hiding eval
open Finset FiniteField
variable {K σ ι : Type*} [Fintype K] [Field K] [Fintype σ] [DecidableEq σ]
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
theorem MvPolynomial.sum_eval_eq_zero (f : MvPolynomial σ K)
(h : f.totalDegree < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ) : ∑ x, eval x f = 0 := by
haveI : DecidableEq K := Classical.decEq K
calc
∑ x, eval x f = ∑ x : σ → K, ∑ d ∈ f.support, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i := by
simp only [eval_eq']
_ = ∑ d ∈ f.support, ∑ x : σ → K, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i := sum_comm
_ = 0 := sum_eq_zero ?_
intro d hd
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, d i < q - 1 := f.exists_degree_lt (q - 1) h hd
calc
(∑ x : σ → K, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i) = f.coeff d * ∑ x : σ → K, ∏ i, x i ^ d i :=
(mul_sum ..).symm
_ = 0 := (mul_eq_zero.mpr ∘ Or.inr) ?_
calc
(∑ x : σ → K, ∏ i, x i ^ d i) =
∑ x₀ : { j // j ≠ i } → K, ∑ x : { x : σ → K // x ∘ (↑) = x₀ }, ∏ j, (x : σ → K) j ^ d j :=
(Fintype.sum_fiberwise _ _).symm
_ = 0 := Fintype.sum_eq_zero _ ?_
intro x₀
let e : K ≃ { x // x ∘ ((↑) : _ → σ) = x₀ } := (Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain _).symm
calc
(∑ x : { x : σ → K // x ∘ (↑) = x₀ }, ∏ j, (x : σ → K) j ^ d j) =
∑ a : K, ∏ j : σ, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := (e.sum_comp _).symm
_ = ∑ a : K, (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * a ^ d i := Fintype.sum_congr _ _ ?_
_ = (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * ∑ a : K, a ^ d i := by rw [mul_sum]
_ = 0 := by rw [sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one K _ hi, mul_zero]
intro a
let e' : { j // j = i } ⊕ { j // j ≠ i } ≃ σ := Equiv.sumCompl _
letI : Unique { j // j = i } :=
{ default := ⟨i, rfl⟩
uniq := fun ⟨j, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h }
calc
(∏ j : σ, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j) =
(e a : σ → K) i ^ d i * ∏ j : { j // j ≠ i }, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := by
rw [← e'.prod_comp, Fintype.prod_sum_type, univ_unique, prod_singleton]; rfl
_ = a ^ d i * ∏ j : { j // j ≠ i }, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := by
rw [Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq]
_ = a ^ d i * ∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j := congr_arg _ (Fintype.prod_congr _ _ ?_)
-- see below
_ = (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * a ^ d i := mul_comm _ _
-- the remaining step of the calculation above
rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
show (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j = x₀ ⟨j, hj⟩ ^ d j
rw [Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne]
variable [DecidableEq K] (p : ℕ) [CharP K p]
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, finitary version.
Let `(f i)` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i` is divisible by `p`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : (∑ i ∈ s, (f i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
have hq : 0 < q - 1 := by rw [← Fintype.card_units, Fintype.card_pos_iff]; exact ⟨1⟩
let S : Finset (σ → K) := {x | ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0}
have hS (x : σ → K) : x ∈ S ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 := by simp [S]
/- The polynomial `F = ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - (f i)^(q - 1))` has the nice property
that it takes the value `1` on elements of `{x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).eval x = 0}`
while it is `0` outside that locus.
Hence the sum of its values is equal to the cardinality of
`{x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).eval x = 0}` modulo `p`. -/
let F : MvPolynomial σ K := ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - f i ^ (q - 1))
have hF : ∀ x, eval x F = if x ∈ S then 1 else 0 := by
intro x
calc
eval x F = ∏ i ∈ s, eval x (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)) := eval_prod s _ x
_ = if x ∈ S then 1 else 0 := ?_
simp only [(eval x).map_sub, (eval x).map_pow, (eval x).map_one]
split_ifs with hx
· apply Finset.prod_eq_one
intro i hi
rw [hS] at hx
rw [hx i hi, zero_pow hq.ne', sub_zero]
· obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ : ∃ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) ≠ 0 := by
simpa [hS, not_forall, Classical.not_imp] using hx
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero hi
rw [pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (eval x (f i)) hx, sub_self]
-- In particular, we can now show:
have key : ∑ x, eval x F = Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype S hS, card_eq_sum_ones, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_one, ←
Fintype.sum_extend_by_zero S, sum_congr rfl fun x _ => hF x]
-- With these preparations under our belt, we will approach the main goal.
show p ∣ Fintype.card { x // ∀ i : ι, i ∈ s → eval x (f i) = 0 }
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K, ← key]
show (∑ x, eval x F) = 0
-- We are now ready to apply the main machine, proven before.
apply F.sum_eval_eq_zero
-- It remains to verify the crucial assumption of this machine
show F.totalDegree < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ
calc
F.totalDegree ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := totalDegree_finset_prod s _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree := sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
-- see ↓
_ = (q - 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).totalDegree := (mul_sum ..).symm
_ < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ := by rwa [mul_lt_mul_left hq]
-- Now we prove the remaining step from the preceding calculation
show (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree ≤ (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree
calc
(1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree ≤
max (1 : MvPolynomial σ K).totalDegree (f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := totalDegree_sub _ _
_ ≤ (f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := by simp
_ ≤ (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree := totalDegree_pow _ _
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, `Fintype` version.
Let `(f i)` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i` is divisible by `p`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt [Fintype ι] {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : (∑ i, (f i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
simpa using char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt p h
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, unary version.
Let `f` be a multivariate polynomial in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`)
over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the total degree of `f` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of solutions of `f` is divisible by `p`.
See `char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt` for a version that takes a family of polynomials `f i`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions {f : MvPolynomial σ K} (h : f.totalDegree < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // eval x f = 0 } := by
let F : Unit → MvPolynomial σ K := fun _ => f
have : (∑ i : Unit, (F i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ := h
convert char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt p this
aesop
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, binary version.
Let `f₁`, `f₂` be two multivariate polynomials in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a
finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of `f₁` and `f₂` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f₁` and `f₂` is divisible by `p`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_add_lt {f₁ f₂ : MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : f₁.totalDegree + f₂.totalDegree < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // eval x f₁ = 0 ∧ eval x f₂ = 0 } := by
let F : Bool → MvPolynomial σ K := fun b => cond b f₂ f₁
have : (∑ b : Bool, (F b).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ := (add_comm _ _).trans_lt h
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool] using char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt p this
end FiniteField
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/ChevalleyWarning.lean | 196 | 201 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Equiv
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Simps.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Substs
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we define two types:
* `Equiv α β` a.k.a. `α ≃ β`: a bijective map `α → β` bundled with its inverse map; we use this (and
not equality!) to express that various `Type`s or `Sort`s are equivalent.
* `Equiv.Perm α`: the group of permutations `α ≃ α`. More lemmas about `Equiv.Perm` can be found in
`Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm`.
Then we define
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.refl α` is the identity map interpreted as `α ≃ α`;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.symm e : β ≃ α` is the inverse of `e : α ≃ β`;
- `Equiv.trans e₁ e₂ : α ≃ γ` is the composition of `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ` (note the order
of the arguments!);
* definitions that transfer some instances along an equivalence. By convention, we transfer
instances from right to left.
- `Equiv.inhabited` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Inhabited β]` and returns `Inhabited α`;
- `Equiv.unique` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Unique β]` and returns `Unique α`;
- `Equiv.decidableEq` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[DecidableEq β]` and returns `DecidableEq α`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
Many more such isomorphisms and operations are defined in `Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic`.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
open Function
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
/-- `α ≃ β` is the type of functions from `α → β` with a two-sided inverse. -/
structure Equiv (α : Sort*) (β : Sort _) where
protected toFun : α → β
protected invFun : β → α
protected left_inv : LeftInverse invFun toFun
protected right_inv : RightInverse invFun toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ " => Equiv
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `EquivLike F α β` into an actual
`Equiv`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃ β`. -/
@[coe]
def EquivLike.toEquiv {F} [EquivLike F α β] (f : F) : α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := EquivLike.inv f
left_inv := EquivLike.left_inv f
right_inv := EquivLike.right_inv f
/-- Any type satisfying `EquivLike` can be cast into `Equiv` via `EquivLike.toEquiv`. -/
instance {F} [EquivLike F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃ β) :=
⟨EquivLike.toEquiv⟩
/-- `Perm α` is the type of bijections from `α` to itself. -/
abbrev Equiv.Perm (α : Sort*) :=
Equiv α α
namespace Equiv
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
inv := Equiv.invFun
left_inv := Equiv.left_inv
right_inv := Equiv.right_inv
coe_injective' e₁ e₂ h₁ h₂ := by cases e₁; cases e₂; congr
/-- Helper instance when inference gets stuck on following the normal chain
`EquivLike → FunLike`.
TODO: this instance doesn't appear to be necessary: remove it (after benchmarking?)
-/
instance : FunLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_coe {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
((e : α ≃ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : (Equiv.mk f g l r : α → β) = f :=
rfl
/-- The map `(r ≃ s) → (r → s)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : @Function.Injective (α ≃ β) (α → β) (fun e => e) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective'
protected theorem coe_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ β} : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
@DFunLike.coe_fn_eq _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : Equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := DFunLike.ext f g H
protected theorem congr_arg {f : Equiv α β} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : Equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[ext] theorem Perm.ext {σ τ : Equiv.Perm α} (H : ∀ x, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ := Equiv.ext H
protected theorem Perm.congr_arg {f : Equiv.Perm α} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
Equiv.congr_arg
protected theorem Perm.congr_fun {f g : Equiv.Perm α} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
Equiv.congr_fun h x
/-- Any type is equivalent to itself. -/
@[refl] protected def refl (α : Sort*) : α ≃ α := ⟨id, id, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (α ≃ α) := ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩
/-- Inverse of an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.invFun, e.toFun, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) : β → α := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections Equiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.left_inv` in terms of `Function.LeftInverse`. -/
theorem left_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e := e.left_inv
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.right_inv` in terms of `Function.RightInverse`. -/
theorem right_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e := e.right_inv
/-- Composition of equivalences `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : α ≃ γ :=
⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm, e₂.left_inv.comp e₁.left_inv, e₂.right_inv.comp e₁.right_inv⟩
@[simps]
instance : Trans Equiv Equiv Equiv where
trans := Equiv.trans
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem toFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.toFun = e := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem invFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.invFun = e.symm := rfl
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ β) : Injective e := EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ β) : Surjective e := EquivLike.surjective e
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ β) : Bijective e := EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem subsingleton (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton α :=
e.injective.subsingleton
protected theorem subsingleton.symm (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton β :=
e.symm.injective.subsingleton
theorem subsingleton_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Subsingleton α ↔ Subsingleton β :=
⟨fun _ => e.symm.subsingleton, fun _ => e.subsingleton⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun f _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ (Equiv.subsingleton.symm f) _ _⟩
instance permUnique [Subsingleton α] : Unique (Perm α) :=
uniqueOfSubsingleton (Equiv.refl α)
theorem Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : e = Equiv.refl α :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
protected theorem nontrivial {α β} (e : α ≃ β) [Nontrivial β] : Nontrivial α :=
e.surjective.nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_congr {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : Nontrivial α ↔ Nontrivial β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ e.symm.nontrivial, fun _ ↦ e.nontrivial⟩
/-- Transfer `DecidableEq` across an equivalence. -/
protected def decidableEq (e : α ≃ β) [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq α :=
e.injective.decidableEq
theorem nonempty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Nonempty α ↔ Nonempty β := Nonempty.congr e e.symm
protected theorem nonempty (e : α ≃ β) [Nonempty β] : Nonempty α := e.nonempty_congr.mpr ‹_›
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is inhabited, then so is `α`. -/
protected def inhabited [Inhabited β] (e : α ≃ β) : Inhabited α := ⟨e.symm default⟩
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is a singleton type, then so is `α`. -/
protected def unique [Unique β] (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α := e.symm.surjective.unique
/-- Equivalence between equal types. -/
protected def cast {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : α ≃ β :=
⟨cast h, cast h.symm, fun _ => by cases h; rfl, fun _ => by cases h; rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : ((Equiv.mk f g l r).symm : β → α) = g := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_refl : (Equiv.refl α : α → α) = id := rfl
/-- This cannot be a `simp` lemmas as it incorrectly matches against `e : α ≃ synonym α`, when
`synonym α` is semireducible. This makes a mess of `Multiplicative.ofAdd` etc. -/
theorem Perm.coe_subsingleton {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : (e : α → α) = id := by
rw [Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl e, coe_refl]
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : Equiv.refl α x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) : (f.trans g : α → γ) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x := e.right_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.apply_coe_symm_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : β) :
e ((e : α ≃ β).symm x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_apply_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : α) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm (e x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_apply_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_comp_self {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm ∘ e = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_comp_self
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.self_comp_coe_symm {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
e ∘ (e : α ≃ β).symm = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : γ) :
(f.trans g).symm a = f.symm (g.symm a) := rfl
theorem symm_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (b : α) : f.symm.symm b = f b := rfl
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (f : α ≃ β) {x y : α} : f x = f y ↔ x = y := EquivLike.apply_eq_iff_eq f
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply {x : α} {y : β} (f : α ≃ β) : f x = y ↔ x = f.symm y := by
conv_lhs => rw [← apply_symm_apply f y]
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp] theorem cast_apply {α β} (h : α = β) (x : α) : Equiv.cast h x = cast h x := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_symm {α β} (h : α = β) : (Equiv.cast h).symm = Equiv.cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {α} (h : α = α := rfl) : Equiv.cast h = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {α β γ} (h : α = β) (h2 : β = γ) :
(Equiv.cast h).trans (Equiv.cast h2) = Equiv.cast (h.trans h2) :=
ext fun x => by substs h h2; rfl
theorem cast_eq_iff_heq {α β} (h : α = β) {a : α} {b : β} : Equiv.cast h a = b ↔ HEq a b := by
subst h; simp [coe_refl]
theorem symm_apply_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_symm_apply {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
(eq_comm.trans e.symm_apply_eq).trans eq_comm
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Equiv.symm : (α ≃ β) → β ≃ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] theorem trans_refl (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans (Equiv.refl β) = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_symm : (Equiv.refl α).symm = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_trans (e : α ≃ β) : (Equiv.refl α).trans e = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.trans e = Equiv.refl β := ext <| by simp
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans e.symm = Equiv.refl α := ext <| by simp
theorem trans_assoc {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.trans bc).trans cd = ab.trans (bc.trans cd) := Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem leftInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : LeftInverse f.symm f := f.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : Function.RightInverse f.symm f := f.right_inv
theorem injective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Injective (f ∘ e) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.injective_comp e f
theorem comp_injective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Injective (e ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.comp_injective f e
theorem surjective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Surjective (f ∘ e) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.surjective_comp e f
theorem comp_surjective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Surjective (e ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.comp_surjective f e
theorem bijective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Bijective (f ∘ e) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.bijective_comp e f
theorem comp_bijective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Bijective (e ∘ f) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.comp_bijective f e
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and `γ` is equivalent to `δ`, then the type of equivalences `α ≃ γ`
is equivalent to the type of equivalences `β ≃ δ`. -/
def equivCongr {δ : Sort*} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) : (α ≃ γ) ≃ (β ≃ δ) where
toFun ac := (ab.symm.trans ac).trans cd
invFun bd := ab.trans <| bd.trans <| cd.symm
left_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl {α β} :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α ≃ β) := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_symm {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.equivCongr cd).symm = ab.symm.equivCongr cd.symm := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_trans {δ ε ζ} (ab : α ≃ β) (de : δ ≃ ε) (bc : β ≃ γ) (ef : ε ≃ ζ) :
(ab.equivCongr de).trans (bc.equivCongr ef) = (ab.trans bc).equivCongr (de.trans ef) := by
ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_left {α β γ} (bg : β ≃ γ) (e : α ≃ β) :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr bg e = e.trans bg := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_right {α β} (ab e : α ≃ β) :
ab.equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) e = ab.symm.trans e := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_apply_apply {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) (e : α ≃ γ) (x) :
ab.equivCongr cd e x = cd (e (ab.symm x)) := rfl
section permCongr
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : α' ≃ β')
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Perm α` is equivalent to `Perm β`. -/
def permCongr : Perm α' ≃ Perm β' := equivCongr e e
theorem permCongr_def (p : Equiv.Perm α') : e.permCongr p = (e.symm.trans p).trans e := rfl
@[simp] theorem permCongr_refl : e.permCongr (Equiv.refl _) = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [permCongr_def]
@[simp] theorem permCongr_symm : e.permCongr.symm = e.symm.permCongr := rfl
@[simp] theorem permCongr_apply (p : Equiv.Perm α') (x) : e.permCongr p x = e (p (e.symm x)) := rfl
theorem permCongr_symm_apply (p : Equiv.Perm β') (x) :
e.permCongr.symm p x = e.symm (p (e x)) := rfl
theorem permCongr_trans (p p' : Equiv.Perm α') :
(e.permCongr p).trans (e.permCongr p') = e.permCongr (p.trans p') := by
ext; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, permCongr_apply, symm_apply_apply]
end permCongr
/-- Two empty types are equivalent. -/
def equivOfIsEmpty (α β : Sort*) [IsEmpty α] [IsEmpty β] : α ≃ β :=
⟨isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim, isEmptyElim⟩
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `Empty` type. -/
def equivEmpty (α : Sort u) [IsEmpty α] : α ≃ Empty := equivOfIsEmpty α _
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `PEmpty` type in any universe. -/
def equivPEmpty (α : Sort v) [IsEmpty α] : α ≃ PEmpty.{u} := equivOfIsEmpty α _
/-- `α` is equivalent to an empty type iff `α` is empty. -/
def equivEmptyEquiv (α : Sort u) : α ≃ Empty ≃ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e => Function.isEmpty e, @equivEmpty α, fun e => ext fun x => (e x).elim, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- The `Sort` of proofs of a false proposition is equivalent to `PEmpty`. -/
def propEquivPEmpty {p : Prop} (h : ¬p) : p ≃ PEmpty := @equivPEmpty p <| IsEmpty.prop_iff.2 h
/-- If both `α` and `β` have a unique element, then `α ≃ β`. -/
def ofUnique (α β : Sort _) [Unique.{u} α] [Unique.{v} β] : α ≃ β where
toFun := default
invFun := default
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-26")] alias equivOfUnique := ofUnique
/-- If `α` has a unique element, then it is equivalent to any `PUnit`. -/
def equivPUnit (α : Sort u) [Unique α] : α ≃ PUnit.{v} := ofUnique α _
/-- The `Sort` of proofs of a true proposition is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def propEquivPUnit {p : Prop} (h : p) : p ≃ PUnit.{0} := @equivPUnit p <| uniqueProp h
/-- `ULift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
protected def ulift {α : Type v} : ULift.{u} α ≃ α :=
⟨ULift.down, ULift.up, ULift.up_down, ULift.down_up.{v, u}⟩
/-- `PLift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
protected def plift : PLift α ≃ α := ⟨PLift.down, PLift.up, PLift.up_down, PLift.down_up⟩
/-- equivalence of propositions is the same as iff -/
def ofIff {P Q : Prop} (h : P ↔ Q) : P ≃ Q := ⟨h.mp, h.mpr, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- If `α₁` is equivalent to `α₂` and `β₁` is equivalent to `β₂`, then the type of maps `α₁ → β₁`
is equivalent to the type of maps `α₂ → β₂`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : (α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) where
toFun f := e₂ ∘ f ∘ e₁.symm
invFun f := e₂.symm ∘ f ∘ e₁
left_inv f := funext fun x => by simp only [comp_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := funext fun x => by simp only [comp_apply, apply_symm_apply]
theorem arrowCongr_comp {α₁ β₁ γ₁ α₂ β₂ γ₂ : Sort*} (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) (ec : γ₁ ≃ γ₂)
(f : α₁ → β₁) (g : β₁ → γ₁) :
arrowCongr ea ec (g ∘ f) = arrowCongr eb ec g ∘ arrowCongr ea eb f := by
ext; simp only [comp, arrowCongr_apply, eb.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_refl {α β : Sort*} :
arrowCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_trans {α₁ α₂ α₃ β₁ β₂ β₃ : Sort*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr_symm {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(arrowCongr e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm := rfl
/-- A version of `Equiv.arrowCongr` in `Type`, rather than `Sort`.
The `equiv_rw` tactic is not able to use the default `Sort` level `Equiv.arrowCongr`,
because Lean's universe rules will not unify `?l_1` with `imax (1 ?m_1)`.
-/
@[simps! apply]
def arrowCongr' {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (hα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (hβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : (α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) :=
Equiv.arrowCongr hα hβ
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr'_refl {α β : Type*} :
arrowCongr' (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr'_trans {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ α₃ β₃ : Type*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
arrowCongr' (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr' e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr' e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem arrowCongr'_symm {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(arrowCongr' e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr' e₁.symm e₂.symm := rfl
/-- Conjugate a map `f : α → α` by an equivalence `α ≃ β`. -/
@[simps! apply] def conj (e : α ≃ β) : (α → α) ≃ (β → β) := arrowCongr e e
@[simp] theorem conj_refl : conj (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl (α → α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem conj_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.conj.symm = e.symm.conj := rfl
@[simp] theorem conj_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(e₁.trans e₂).conj = e₁.conj.trans e₂.conj := rfl
-- This should not be a simp lemma as long as `(∘)` is reducible:
-- when `(∘)` is reducible, Lean can unify `f₁ ∘ f₂` with any `g` using
-- `f₁ := g` and `f₂ := fun x ↦ x`. This causes nontermination.
theorem conj_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f₁ f₂ : α → α) : e.conj (f₁ ∘ f₂) = e.conj f₁ ∘ e.conj f₂ := by
apply arrowCongr_comp
theorem eq_comp_symm {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) (g : α → γ) : f = g ∘ e.symm ↔ f ∘ e = g :=
(e.arrowCongr (Equiv.refl γ)).symm_apply_eq.symm
theorem comp_symm_eq {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) (g : α → γ) : g ∘ e.symm = f ↔ g = f ∘ e :=
(e.arrowCongr (Equiv.refl γ)).eq_symm_apply.symm
theorem eq_symm_comp {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) : f = e.symm ∘ g ↔ e ∘ f = g :=
((Equiv.refl γ).arrowCongr e).eq_symm_apply
theorem symm_comp_eq {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) : e.symm ∘ g = f ↔ g = e ∘ f :=
((Equiv.refl γ).arrowCongr e).symm_apply_eq
theorem trans_eq_refl_iff_eq_symm {f : α ≃ β} {g : β ≃ α} :
f.trans g = Equiv.refl α ↔ f = g.symm := by
rw [← Equiv.coe_inj, coe_trans, coe_refl, ← eq_symm_comp, comp_id, Equiv.coe_inj]
theorem trans_eq_refl_iff_symm_eq {f : α ≃ β} {g : β ≃ α} :
f.trans g = Equiv.refl α ↔ f.symm = g := by
rw [trans_eq_refl_iff_eq_symm]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem eq_symm_iff_trans_eq_refl {f : α ≃ β} {g : β ≃ α} :
f = g.symm ↔ f.trans g = Equiv.refl α :=
trans_eq_refl_iff_eq_symm.symm
theorem symm_eq_iff_trans_eq_refl {f : α ≃ β} {g : β ≃ α} :
f.symm = g ↔ f.trans g = Equiv.refl α :=
trans_eq_refl_iff_symm_eq.symm
/-- `PUnit` sorts in any two universes are equivalent. -/
def punitEquivPUnit : PUnit.{v} ≃ PUnit.{w} :=
⟨fun _ => .unit, fun _ => .unit, fun ⟨⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨⟩ => rfl⟩
/-- `Prop` is noncomputably equivalent to `Bool`. -/
noncomputable def propEquivBool : Prop ≃ Bool where
toFun p := @decide p (Classical.propDecidable _)
invFun b := b
left_inv p := by simp [@Bool.decide_iff p (Classical.propDecidable _)]
right_inv b := by cases b <;> simp
section
/-- The sort of maps to `PUnit.{v}` is equivalent to `PUnit.{w}`. -/
def arrowPUnitEquivPUnit (α : Sort*) : (α → PUnit.{v}) ≃ PUnit.{w} :=
⟨fun _ => .unit, fun _ _ => .unit, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- The equivalence `(∀ i, β i) ≃ β ⋆` when the domain of `β` only contains `⋆` -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def piUnique [Unique α] (β : α → Sort*) : (∀ i, β i) ≃ β default where
toFun f := f default
invFun := uniqueElim
left_inv f := by ext i; cases Unique.eq_default i; rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- If `α` has a unique term, then the type of function `α → β` is equivalent to `β`. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied apply symm_apply]
def funUnique (α β) [Unique.{u} α] : (α → β) ≃ β := piUnique _
/-- The sort of maps from `PUnit` is equivalent to the codomain. -/
def punitArrowEquiv (α : Sort*) : (PUnit.{u} → α) ≃ α := funUnique PUnit.{u} α
/-- The sort of maps from `True` is equivalent to the codomain. -/
def trueArrowEquiv (α : Sort*) : (True → α) ≃ α := funUnique _ _
/-- The sort of maps from a type that `IsEmpty` is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def arrowPUnitOfIsEmpty (α β : Sort*) [IsEmpty α] : (α → β) ≃ PUnit.{u} where
toFun _ := PUnit.unit
invFun _ := isEmptyElim
left_inv _ := funext isEmptyElim
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The sort of maps from `Empty` is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def emptyArrowEquivPUnit (α : Sort*) : (Empty → α) ≃ PUnit.{u} := arrowPUnitOfIsEmpty _ _
/-- The sort of maps from `PEmpty` is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def pemptyArrowEquivPUnit (α : Sort*) : (PEmpty → α) ≃ PUnit.{u} := arrowPUnitOfIsEmpty _ _
/-- The sort of maps from `False` is equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
def falseArrowEquivPUnit (α : Sort*) : (False → α) ≃ PUnit.{u} := arrowPUnitOfIsEmpty _ _
end
section
/-- A `PSigma`-type is equivalent to the corresponding `Sigma`-type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def psigmaEquivSigma {α} (β : α → Type*) : (Σ' i, β i) ≃ Σ i, β i where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A `PSigma`-type is equivalent to the corresponding `Sigma`-type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def psigmaEquivSigmaPLift {α} (β : α → Sort*) : (Σ' i, β i) ≃ Σ i : PLift α, PLift (β i.down) where
toFun a := ⟨PLift.up a.1, PLift.up a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1.down, a.2.down⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A family of equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `Σ' a, β₁ a` and
`Σ' a, β₂ a`. -/
@[simps apply]
def psigmaCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (Σ' a, β₁ a) ≃ Σ' a, β₂ a where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, F a.1 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, (F a.1).symm a.2⟩
left_inv | ⟨a, b⟩ => congr_arg (PSigma.mk a) <| symm_apply_apply (F a) b
right_inv | ⟨a, b⟩ => congr_arg (PSigma.mk a) <| apply_symm_apply (F a) b
theorem psigmaCongrRight_trans {α} {β₁ β₂ β₃ : α → Sort*}
(F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) (G : ∀ a, β₂ a ≃ β₃ a) :
(psigmaCongrRight F).trans (psigmaCongrRight G) =
psigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).trans (G a) := rfl
theorem psigmaCongrRight_symm {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) :
(psigmaCongrRight F).symm = psigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).symm := rfl
@[simp]
theorem psigmaCongrRight_refl {α} {β : α → Sort*} :
(psigmaCongrRight fun a => Equiv.refl (β a)) = Equiv.refl (Σ' a, β a) := rfl
/-- A family of equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `Σ a, β₁ a` and
`Σ a, β₂ a`. -/
@[simps apply]
def sigmaCongrRight {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Type*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (Σ a, β₁ a) ≃ Σ a, β₂ a where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, F a.1 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, (F a.1).symm a.2⟩
left_inv | ⟨a, b⟩ => congr_arg (Sigma.mk a) <| symm_apply_apply (F a) b
right_inv | ⟨a, b⟩ => congr_arg (Sigma.mk a) <| apply_symm_apply (F a) b
theorem sigmaCongrRight_trans {α} {β₁ β₂ β₃ : α → Type*}
(F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) (G : ∀ a, β₂ a ≃ β₃ a) :
(sigmaCongrRight F).trans (sigmaCongrRight G) =
sigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).trans (G a) := rfl
theorem sigmaCongrRight_symm {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Type*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) :
(sigmaCongrRight F).symm = sigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).symm := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sigmaCongrRight_refl {α} {β : α → Type*} :
(sigmaCongrRight fun a => Equiv.refl (β a)) = Equiv.refl (Σ a, β a) := rfl
/-- A `PSigma` with `Prop` fibers is equivalent to the subtype. -/
def psigmaEquivSubtype {α : Type v} (P : α → Prop) : (Σ' i, P i) ≃ Subtype P where
toFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A `Sigma` with `PLift` fibers is equivalent to the subtype. -/
def sigmaPLiftEquivSubtype {α : Type v} (P : α → Prop) : (Σ i, PLift (P i)) ≃ Subtype P :=
((psigmaEquivSigma _).symm.trans
(psigmaCongrRight fun _ => Equiv.plift)).trans (psigmaEquivSubtype P)
/-- A `Sigma` with `fun i ↦ ULift (PLift (P i))` fibers is equivalent to `{ x // P x }`.
Variant of `sigmaPLiftEquivSubtype`.
-/
def sigmaULiftPLiftEquivSubtype {α : Type v} (P : α → Prop) :
(Σ i, ULift (PLift (P i))) ≃ Subtype P :=
(sigmaCongrRight fun _ => Equiv.ulift).trans (sigmaPLiftEquivSubtype P)
namespace Perm
/-- A family of permutations `Π a, Perm (β a)` generates a permutation `Perm (Σ a, β₁ a)`. -/
abbrev sigmaCongrRight {α} {β : α → Sort _} (F : ∀ a, Perm (β a)) : Perm (Σ a, β a) :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight F
@[simp] theorem sigmaCongrRight_trans {α} {β : α → Sort _}
(F : ∀ a, Perm (β a)) (G : ∀ a, Perm (β a)) :
(sigmaCongrRight F).trans (sigmaCongrRight G) = sigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).trans (G a) :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_trans F G
@[simp] theorem sigmaCongrRight_symm {α} {β : α → Sort _} (F : ∀ a, Perm (β a)) :
(sigmaCongrRight F).symm = sigmaCongrRight fun a => (F a).symm :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_symm F
@[simp] theorem sigmaCongrRight_refl {α} {β : α → Sort _} :
(sigmaCongrRight fun a => Equiv.refl (β a)) = Equiv.refl (Σ a, β a) :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_refl
end Perm
/-- An equivalence `f : α₁ ≃ α₂` generates an equivalence between `Σ a, β (f a)` and `Σ a, β a`. -/
@[simps apply] def sigmaCongrLeft {α₁ α₂ : Type*} {β : α₂ → Sort _} (e : α₁ ≃ α₂) :
(Σ a : α₁, β (e a)) ≃ Σ a : α₂, β a where
toFun a := ⟨e a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨e.symm a.1, (e.right_inv' a.1).symm ▸ a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
/-- Transporting a sigma type through an equivalence of the base -/
def sigmaCongrLeft' {α₁ α₂} {β : α₁ → Sort _} (f : α₁ ≃ α₂) :
(Σ a : α₁, β a) ≃ Σ a : α₂, β (f.symm a) := (sigmaCongrLeft f.symm).symm
/-- Transporting a sigma type through an equivalence of the base and a family of equivalences
of matching fibers -/
def sigmaCongr {α₁ α₂} {β₁ : α₁ → Sort _} {β₂ : α₂ → Sort _} (f : α₁ ≃ α₂)
(F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ (f a)) : Sigma β₁ ≃ Sigma β₂ :=
(sigmaCongrRight F).trans (sigmaCongrLeft f)
/-- `Sigma` type with a constant fiber is equivalent to the product. -/
@[simps (config := { attrs := [`mfld_simps] }) apply symm_apply]
def sigmaEquivProd (α β : Type*) : (Σ _ : α, β) ≃ α × β :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, fun a => ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
/-- If each fiber of a `Sigma` type is equivalent to a fixed type, then the sigma type
is equivalent to the product. -/
def sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv {α β} {β₁ : α → Sort _} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β) : Sigma β₁ ≃ α × β :=
(sigmaCongrRight F).trans (sigmaEquivProd α β)
/-- The dependent product of types is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def sigmaAssoc {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a : α, β a → Type*) :
(Σ ab : Σ a : α, β a, γ ab.1 ab.2) ≃ Σ a : α, Σ b : β a, γ a b where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, ⟨x.1.2, x.2⟩⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1, x.2.1⟩, x.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The dependent product of sorts is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def pSigmaAssoc {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} (γ : ∀ a : α, β a → Sort*) :
(Σ' ab : Σ' a : α, β a, γ ab.1 ab.2) ≃ Σ' a : α, Σ' b : β a, γ a b where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, ⟨x.1.2, x.2⟩⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1, x.2.1⟩, x.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
end
variable {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
protected lemma forall_congr_right : (∀ a, q (e a)) ↔ ∀ b, q b :=
⟨fun h a ↦ by simpa using h (e.symm a), fun h _ ↦ h _⟩
protected lemma forall_congr_left : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ b, p (e.symm b) :=
e.symm.forall_congr_right.symm
protected lemma forall_congr (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ b, q b :=
e.forall_congr_left.trans (by simp [h])
protected lemma forall_congr' (h : ∀ b, p (e.symm b) ↔ q b) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ b, q b :=
e.forall_congr_left.trans (by simp [h])
protected lemma exists_congr_right : (∃ a, q (e a)) ↔ ∃ b, q b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ ↦ ⟨e.symm a, by simpa using h⟩⟩
protected lemma exists_congr_left : (∃ a, p a) ↔ ∃ b, p (e.symm b) :=
e.symm.exists_congr_right.symm
protected lemma exists_congr (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) : (∃ a, p a) ↔ ∃ b, q b :=
e.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [h]
protected lemma exists_congr' (h : ∀ b, p (e.symm b) ↔ q b) : (∃ a, p a) ↔ ∃ b, q b :=
e.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [h]
protected lemma existsUnique_congr_right : (∃! a, q (e a)) ↔ ∃! b, q b :=
e.exists_congr <| by simpa using fun _ _ ↦ e.forall_congr (by simp)
protected lemma existsUnique_congr_left : (∃! a, p a) ↔ ∃! b, p (e.symm b) :=
e.symm.existsUnique_congr_right.symm
protected lemma existsUnique_congr (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) : (∃! a, p a) ↔ ∃! b, q b :=
e.existsUnique_congr_left.trans <| by simp [h]
protected lemma existsUnique_congr' (h : ∀ b, p (e.symm b) ↔ q b) : (∃! a, p a) ↔ ∃! b, q b :=
e.existsUnique_congr_left.trans <| by simp [h]
-- We next build some higher arity versions of `Equiv.forall_congr`.
-- Although they appear to just be repeated applications of `Equiv.forall_congr`,
-- unification of metavariables works better with these versions.
-- In particular, they are necessary in `equiv_rw`.
-- (Stopping at ternary functions seems reasonable: at least in 1-categorical mathematics,
-- it's rare to have axioms involving more than 3 elements at once.)
protected theorem forall₂_congr {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Sort*} {p : α₁ → β₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (h : ∀ {x y}, p x y ↔ q (eα x) (eβ y)) :
(∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ x y, q x y :=
eα.forall_congr fun _ ↦ eβ.forall_congr <| @h _
protected theorem forall₂_congr' {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Sort*} {p : α₁ → β₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (h : ∀ {x y}, p (eα.symm x) (eβ.symm y) ↔ q x y) :
(∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ x y, q x y := (Equiv.forall₂_congr eα.symm eβ.symm h.symm).symm
protected theorem forall₃_congr
{α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ γ₁ γ₂ : Sort*} {p : α₁ → β₁ → γ₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → γ₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (eγ : γ₁ ≃ γ₂) (h : ∀ {x y z}, p x y z ↔ q (eα x) (eβ y) (eγ z)) :
(∀ x y z, p x y z) ↔ ∀ x y z, q x y z :=
Equiv.forall₂_congr _ _ <| Equiv.forall_congr _ <| @h _ _
protected theorem forall₃_congr'
{α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ γ₁ γ₂ : Sort*} {p : α₁ → β₁ → γ₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → γ₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (eγ : γ₁ ≃ γ₂)
(h : ∀ {x y z}, p (eα.symm x) (eβ.symm y) (eγ.symm z) ↔ q x y z) :
(∀ x y z, p x y z) ↔ ∀ x y z, q x y z :=
(Equiv.forall₃_congr eα.symm eβ.symm eγ.symm h.symm).symm
/-- If `f` is a bijective function, then its domain is equivalent to its codomain. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def ofBijective (f : α → β) (hf : Bijective f) : α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := surjInv hf.surjective
left_inv := leftInverse_surjInv hf
right_inv := rightInverse_surjInv _
lemma ofBijective_apply_symm_apply (f : α → β) (hf : Bijective f) (x : β) :
f ((ofBijective f hf).symm x) = x :=
(ofBijective f hf).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
lemma ofBijective_symm_apply_apply (f : α → β) (hf : Bijective f) (x : α) :
(ofBijective f hf).symm (f x) = x :=
(ofBijective f hf).symm_apply_apply x
end Equiv
namespace Quot
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between quotient spaces,
if `ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)`. -/
protected def congr {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀ a₁ a₂, ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) : Quot ra ≃ Quot rb where
toFun := Quot.map e fun a₁ a₂ => (eq a₁ a₂).1
invFun := Quot.map e.symm fun b₁ b₂ h =>
(eq (e.symm b₁) (e.symm b₂)).2
((e.apply_symm_apply b₁).symm ▸ (e.apply_symm_apply b₂).symm ▸ h)
left_inv := by rintro ⟨a⟩; simp only [Quot.map, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv := by rintro ⟨a⟩; simp only [Quot.map, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] theorem congr_mk {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) (a : α) :
Quot.congr e eq (Quot.mk ra a) = Quot.mk rb (e a) := rfl
/-- Quotients are congruent on equivalences under equality of their relation.
An alternative is just to use rewriting with `eq`, but then computational proofs get stuck. -/
protected def congrRight {r r' : α → α → Prop} (eq : ∀ a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ ↔ r' a₁ a₂) :
Quot r ≃ Quot r' := Quot.congr (Equiv.refl α) eq
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between the quotient space of `α`
by a relation `ra` and the quotient space of `β` by the image of this relation under `e`. -/
protected def congrLeft {r : α → α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
Quot r ≃ Quot fun b b' => r (e.symm b) (e.symm b') :=
Quot.congr e fun _ _ => by simp only [e.symm_apply_apply]
end Quot
namespace Quotient
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between quotient spaces,
if `ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)`. -/
protected def congr {ra : Setoid α} {rb : Setoid β} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀ a₁ a₂, ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) :
Quotient ra ≃ Quotient rb := Quot.congr e eq
@[simp] theorem congr_mk {ra : Setoid α} {rb : Setoid β} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) (a : α) :
Quotient.congr e eq (Quotient.mk ra a) = Quotient.mk rb (e a) := rfl
/-- Quotients are congruent on equivalences under equality of their relation.
An alternative is just to use rewriting with `eq`, but then computational proofs get stuck. -/
protected def congrRight {r r' : Setoid α}
(eq : ∀ a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ ↔ r' a₁ a₂) : Quotient r ≃ Quotient r' :=
Quot.congrRight eq
end Quotient
/-- Equivalence between `Fin 0` and `Empty`. -/
def finZeroEquiv : Fin 0 ≃ Empty := .equivEmpty _
/-- Equivalence between `Fin 0` and `PEmpty`. -/
def finZeroEquiv' : Fin 0 ≃ PEmpty.{u} := .equivPEmpty _
/-- Equivalence between `Fin 1` and `Unit`. -/
def finOneEquiv : Fin 1 ≃ Unit := .equivPUnit _
/-- Equivalence between `Fin 2` and `Bool`. -/
def finTwoEquiv : Fin 2 ≃ Bool where
toFun i := i == 1
invFun b := bif b then 1 else 0
left_inv i :=
match i with
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
right_inv b := by cases b <;> simp
namespace Equiv
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- The left summand of `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps]
def sumIsLeft : {x : α ⊕ β // x.isLeft} ≃ α where
toFun x := x.1.getLeft x.2
invFun a := ⟨.inl a, Sum.isLeft_inl⟩
left_inv | ⟨.inl _a, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv _a := rfl
/-- The right summand of `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to `β`. -/
@[simps]
def sumIsRight : {x : α ⊕ β // x.isRight} ≃ β where
toFun x := x.1.getRight x.2
invFun b := ⟨.inr b, Sum.isRight_inr⟩
left_inv | ⟨.inr _b, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv _b := rfl
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean | 896 | 897 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ']
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
theorem card_image₂_iff :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_mem_image2]
lemma exists_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, exists_mem_image2]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image₂_iff := forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image₂
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_left : image₂ f {a} t = t.image fun b => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_right : image₂ f s {b} = s.image fun a => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image₂_singleton_left' : image₂ f {a} t = t.image (f a) :=
image₂_singleton_left
theorem image₂_singleton : image₂ f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
theorem image₂_union_left [DecidableEq α] : image₂ f (s ∪ s') t = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_left
theorem image₂_union_right [DecidableEq β] : image₂ f s (t ∪ t') = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (insert a s) t = (t.image fun b => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (insert b t) = (s.image fun a => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_right
theorem image₂_inter_left [DecidableEq α] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_left hf
theorem image₂_inter_right [DecidableEq β] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_right hf
theorem image₂_inter_subset_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_left
theorem image₂_inter_subset_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_right
theorem image₂_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_congr h
/-- A common special case of `image₂_congr` -/
theorem image₂_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
image₂_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
variable (s t)
theorem card_image₂_singleton_left (hf : Injective (f a)) : #(image₂ f {a} t) = #t := by
rw [image₂_singleton_left, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem card_image₂_singleton_right (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
#(image₂ f s {b}) = #s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem image₂_singleton_inter [DecidableEq β] (t₁ t₂ : Finset β) (hf : Injective (f a)) :
image₂ f {a} (t₁ ∩ t₂) = image₂ f {a} t₁ ∩ image₂ f {a} t₂ := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_left, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem image₂_inter_singleton [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
image₂ f (s₁ ∩ s₂) {b} = image₂ f s₁ {b} ∩ image₂ f s₂ {b} := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_right, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem card_le_card_image₂_left {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hf : ∀ a, Injective (f a)) :
#t ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_left _ (hf a)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_right <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)
theorem card_le_card_image₂_right {t : Finset β} (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hf : ∀ b, Injective fun a => f a b) : #s ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_right _ (hf b)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_left <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hb)
variable {s t}
theorem biUnion_image_left : (s.biUnion fun a => t.image <| f a) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_left _
theorem biUnion_image_right : (t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_right _
|
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 243 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Order.Birkhoff
import Mathlib.Order.Booleanisation
import Mathlib.Order.Sublattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# The four functions theorem and corollaries
This file proves the four functions theorem. The statement is that if
`f₁ a * f₂ b ≤ f₃ (a ⊓ b) * f₄ (a ⊔ b)` for all `a`, `b` in a finite distributive lattice, then
`(∑ x ∈ s, f₁ x) * (∑ x ∈ t, f₂ x) ≤ (∑ x ∈ s ⊼ t, f₃ x) * (∑ x ∈ s ⊻ t, f₄ x)` where
`s ⊼ t = {a ⊓ b | a ∈ s, b ∈ t}`, `s ⊻ t = {a ⊔ b | a ∈ s, b ∈ t}`.
The proof uses Birkhoff's representation theorem to restrict to the case where the finite
distributive lattice is in fact a finite powerset algebra, namely `Finset α` for some finite `α`.
Then it proves this new statement by induction on the size of `α`.
## Main declarations
The two versions of the four functions theorem are
* `Finset.four_functions_theorem` for finite powerset algebras.
* `four_functions_theorem` for any finite distributive lattices.
We deduce a number of corollaries:
* `Finset.le_card_infs_mul_card_sups`: Daykin inequality. `|s| |t| ≤ |s ⊼ t| |s ⊻ t|`
* `holley`: Holley inequality.
* `fkg`: Fortuin-Kastelyn-Ginibre inequality.
* `Finset.card_le_card_diffs`: Marica-Schönheim inequality. `|s| ≤ |{a \ b | a, b ∈ s}|`
## TODO
Prove that lattices in which `Finset.le_card_infs_mul_card_sups` holds are distributive. See
Daykin, *A lattice is distributive iff |A| |B| <= |A ∨ B| |A ∧ B|*
Prove the Fishburn-Shepp inequality.
Is `collapse` a construct generally useful for set family inductions? If so, we should move it to an
earlier file and give it a proper API.
## References
[*Applications of the FKG Inequality and Its Relatives*, Graham][Graham1983]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function
open scoped FinsetFamily
variable {α β : Type*}
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α] [CommSemiring β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β]
{𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {a : α} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄ : Finset α → β} {s t u : Finset α}
/-- The `n = 1` case of the Ahlswede-Daykin inequality. Note that we can't just expand everything
out and bound termwise since `c₀ * d₁` appears twice on the RHS of the assumptions while `c₁ * d₀`
does not appear. -/
private lemma ineq [ExistsAddOfLE β] {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ c₀ c₁ d₀ d₁ : β}
(ha₀ : 0 ≤ a₀) (ha₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (hb₀ : 0 ≤ b₀) (hb₁ : 0 ≤ b₁)
(hc₀ : 0 ≤ c₀) (hc₁ : 0 ≤ c₁) (hd₀ : 0 ≤ d₀) (hd₁ : 0 ≤ d₁)
(h₀₀ : a₀ * b₀ ≤ c₀ * d₀) (h₁₀ : a₁ * b₀ ≤ c₀ * d₁)
(h₀₁ : a₀ * b₁ ≤ c₀ * d₁) (h₁₁ : a₁ * b₁ ≤ c₁ * d₁) :
(a₀ + a₁) * (b₀ + b₁) ≤ (c₀ + c₁) * (d₀ + d₁) := by
calc
_ = a₀ * b₀ + (a₀ * b₁ + a₁ * b₀) + a₁ * b₁ := by ring
_ ≤ c₀ * d₀ + (c₀ * d₁ + c₁ * d₀) + c₁ * d₁ := add_le_add_three h₀₀ ?_ h₁₁
_ = (c₀ + c₁) * (d₀ + d₁) := by ring
obtain hcd | hcd := (mul_nonneg hc₀ hd₁).eq_or_gt
· rw [hcd] at h₀₁ h₁₀
rw [h₀₁.antisymm, h₁₀.antisymm, add_zero] <;> positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ hcd
calc (a₀ * b₁ + a₁ * b₀) * (c₀ * d₁)
= a₀ * b₁ * (c₀ * d₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (a₁ * b₀) := by ring
_ ≤ a₀ * b₁ * (a₁ * b₀) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) := mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul h₀₁ h₁₀
_ = a₀ * b₀ * (a₁ * b₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) := by ring
_ ≤ c₀ * d₀ * (c₁ * d₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) :=
add_le_add_right (mul_le_mul h₀₀ h₁₁ (by positivity) <| by positivity) _
_ = (c₀ * d₁ + c₁ * d₀) * (c₀ * d₁) := by ring
private def collapse (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) (f : Finset α → β) (s : Finset α) : β :=
∑ t ∈ 𝒜 with t.erase a = s, f t
| private lemma erase_eq_iff (hs : a ∉ s) : t.erase a = s ↔ t = s ∨ t = insert a s := by
by_cases ht : a ∈ t <;>
· simp [ne_of_mem_of_not_mem', erase_eq_iff_eq_insert, *]
aesop
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/FourFunctions.lean | 93 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-David Salchow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
/-!
# Operator norm as an `NNNorm`
Operator norm as an `NNNorm`, i.e. taking values in non-negative reals.
-/
suppress_compilation
open Bornology
open Filter hiding map_smul
open scoped NNReal Topology Uniformity
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ E Eₗ F Fₗ G Gₗ 𝓕 : Type*}
section SemiNormed
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Eₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup Fₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Gₗ]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Eₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₃ G]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 Gₗ] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃}
[RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
section OpNorm
open Set Real
section
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃] (f g : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (h : F →SL[σ₂₃] G)
(x : E)
theorem nnnorm_def (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ‖f‖₊ = sInf { c | ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖x‖₊ } := by
ext
rw [NNReal.coe_sInf, coe_nnnorm, norm_def, NNReal.coe_image]
simp_rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_nnnorm, mem_setOf_eq, NNReal.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem opNNNorm_le_bound (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (M : ℝ≥0) (hM : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ M * ‖x‖₊) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ M :=
opNorm_le_bound f (zero_le M) hM
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, `‖x‖₊ ≠ 0`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem opNNNorm_le_bound' (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (M : ℝ≥0) (hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖₊ ≠ 0 → ‖f x‖₊ ≤ M * ‖x‖₊) :
‖f‖₊ ≤ M :=
opNorm_le_bound' f (zero_le M) fun x hx => hM x <| by rwa [← NNReal.coe_ne_zero]
/-- For a continuous real linear map `f`, if one controls the norm of every `f x`, `‖x‖₊ = 1`, then
one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNNNorm_le_of_unit_nnnorm [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ≥0}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖x‖₊ = 1 → ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C :=
opNorm_le_of_unit_norm C.coe_nonneg fun x hx => hf x <| by rwa [← NNReal.coe_eq_one]
theorem opNNNorm_le_of_lipschitz {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
‖f‖₊ ≤ K :=
opNorm_le_of_lipschitz hf
theorem opNNNorm_eq_of_bounds {φ : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} (M : ℝ≥0) (h_above : ∀ x, ‖φ x‖₊ ≤ M * ‖x‖₊)
(h_below : ∀ N, (∀ x, ‖φ x‖₊ ≤ N * ‖x‖₊) → M ≤ N) : ‖φ‖₊ = M :=
Subtype.ext <| opNorm_eq_of_bounds (zero_le M) h_above <| Subtype.forall'.mpr h_below
theorem opNNNorm_le_iff {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {C : ℝ≥0} : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊ :=
opNorm_le_iff C.2
theorem isLeast_opNNNorm : IsLeast {C : ℝ≥0 | ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊} ‖f‖₊ := by
simpa only [← opNNNorm_le_iff] using isLeast_Ici
theorem opNNNorm_comp_le [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ‖h.comp f‖₊ ≤ ‖h‖₊ * ‖f‖₊ :=
opNorm_comp_le h f
lemma opENorm_comp_le [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ‖h.comp f‖ₑ ≤ ‖h‖ₑ * ‖f‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_mul] using opNNNorm_comp_le h f
theorem le_opNNNorm : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ :=
f.le_opNorm x
lemma le_opENorm : ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖f‖ₑ * ‖x‖ₑ := by dsimp [enorm]; exact mod_cast le_opNNNorm ..
theorem nndist_le_opNNNorm (x y : E) : nndist (f x) (f y) ≤ ‖f‖₊ * nndist x y :=
dist_le_opNorm f x y
/-- continuous linear maps are Lipschitz continuous. -/
theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith ‖f‖₊ f :=
AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm f _ f.le_opNNNorm
/-- Evaluation of a continuous linear map `f` at a point is Lipschitz continuous in `f`. -/
theorem lipschitz_apply (x : E) : LipschitzWith ‖x‖₊ fun f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F => f x :=
lipschitzWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun f g => ((f - g).le_opNorm x).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
end
section Sup
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem exists_mul_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < ‖f‖₊) :
∃ x, r * ‖x‖₊ < ‖f x‖₊ := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le, Set.mem_setOf] using
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (nnnorm_def f ▸ hr : r < sInf { c : ℝ≥0 | ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖x‖₊ })
(OrderBot.bddBelow _)
theorem exists_mul_lt_of_lt_opNorm (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {r : ℝ} (hr₀ : 0 ≤ r) (hr : r < ‖f‖) :
∃ x, r * ‖x‖ < ‖f x‖ := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr₀
exact f.exists_mul_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm hr
theorem exists_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(hr : r < ‖f‖₊) : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖₊ < 1 ∧ r < ‖f x‖₊ := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := f.exists_mul_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm hr
have hy' : ‖y‖₊ ≠ 0 :=
nnnorm_ne_zero_iff.2 fun heq => by
simp [heq, nnnorm_zero, map_zero, not_lt_zero'] at hy
have hfy : ‖f y‖₊ ≠ 0 := (zero_le'.trans_lt hy).ne'
rw [← inv_inv ‖f y‖₊, NNReal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt (inv_ne_zero hfy), mul_assoc, mul_comm ‖y‖₊, ←
mul_assoc, ← NNReal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt hy'] at hy
obtain ⟨k, hk₁, hk₂⟩ := NormedField.exists_lt_nnnorm_lt 𝕜 hy
refine ⟨k • y, (nnnorm_smul k y).symm ▸ (NNReal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt hy').1 hk₂, ?_⟩
have : ‖σ₁₂ k‖₊ = ‖k‖₊ := Subtype.ext RingHomIsometric.is_iso
rwa [map_smulₛₗ f, nnnorm_smul, ← div_lt_iff₀ hfy.bot_lt, div_eq_mul_inv, this]
theorem exists_lt_apply_of_lt_opNorm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {r : ℝ}
(hr : r < ‖f‖) : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖ < 1 ∧ r < ‖f x‖ := by
by_cases hr₀ : r < 0
· exact ⟨0, by simpa using hr₀⟩
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using not_lt.1 hr₀
exact f.exists_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm hr
theorem sSup_unit_ball_eq_nnnorm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
sSup ((fun x => ‖f x‖₊) '' ball 0 1) = ‖f‖₊ := by
refine csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt ((nonempty_ball.mpr zero_lt_one).image _) ?_
fun ub hub => ?_
· rintro - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
simpa only [mul_one] using f.le_opNorm_of_le (mem_ball_zero_iff.1 hx).le
· obtain ⟨x, hx, hxf⟩ := f.exists_lt_apply_of_lt_opNNNorm hub
exact ⟨_, ⟨x, mem_ball_zero_iff.2 hx, rfl⟩, hxf⟩
theorem sSup_unit_ball_eq_norm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
[DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
sSup ((fun x => ‖f x‖) '' ball 0 1) = ‖f‖ := by
simpa only [NNReal.coe_sSup, Set.image_image] using NNReal.coe_inj.2 f.sSup_unit_ball_eq_nnnorm
theorem sSup_unitClosedBall_eq_nnnorm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
sSup ((fun x => ‖f x‖₊) '' closedBall 0 1) = ‖f‖₊ := by
have hbdd : ∀ y ∈ (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) '' closedBall 0 1, y ≤ ‖f‖₊ := by
rintro - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact f.unit_le_opNorm x (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.1 hx)
refine le_antisymm (csSup_le ((nonempty_closedBall.mpr zero_le_one).image _) hbdd) ?_
rw [← sSup_unit_ball_eq_nnnorm]
exact csSup_le_csSup ⟨‖f‖₊, hbdd⟩ ((nonempty_ball.2 zero_lt_one).image _)
(Set.image_subset _ ball_subset_closedBall)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias sSup_closed_unit_ball_eq_nnnorm := sSup_unitClosedBall_eq_nnnorm
theorem sSup_unitClosedBall_eq_norm {𝕜 𝕜₂ E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [DenselyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂}
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
sSup ((fun x => ‖f x‖) '' closedBall 0 1) = ‖f‖ := by
simpa only [NNReal.coe_sSup, Set.image_image] using
NNReal.coe_inj.2 f.sSup_unitClosedBall_eq_nnnorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias sSup_closed_unit_ball_eq_norm := sSup_unitClosedBall_eq_norm
end Sup
end OpNorm
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable {σ₂₁ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable (e : E ≃SL[σ₁₂] F)
protected theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith ‖(e : E →SL[σ₁₂] F)‖₊ e :=
(e : E →SL[σ₁₂] F).lipschitz
| end ContinuousLinearEquiv
end SemiNormed
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm/NNNorm.lean | 210 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Frobenius
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Subring
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Integers
/-!
# Ring Perfection and Tilt
In this file we define the perfection of a ring of characteristic p, and the tilt of a field
given a valuation to `ℝ≥0`.
## TODO
Define the valuation on the tilt, and define a characteristic predicate for the tilt.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
open scoped NNReal
/-- The perfection of a monoid `M`, defined to be the projective limit of `M`
using the `p`-th power maps `M → M` indexed by the natural numbers, implemented as
`{ f : ℕ → M | ∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n }`. -/
def Monoid.perfection (M : Type u₁) [CommMonoid M] (p : ℕ) : Submonoid (ℕ → M) where
carrier := { f | ∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n }
one_mem' _ := one_pow _
mul_mem' hf hg n := (mul_pow _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (hf n) (hg n)
/-- The perfection of a ring `R` with characteristic `p`, as a subsemiring,
defined to be the projective limit of `R` using the Frobenius maps `R → R`
indexed by the natural numbers, implemented as `{ f : ℕ → R | ∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n }`. -/
def Ring.perfectionSubsemiring (R : Type u₁) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
[CharP R p] : Subsemiring (ℕ → R) :=
{ Monoid.perfection R p with
zero_mem' := fun _ ↦ zero_pow hp.1.ne_zero
add_mem' := fun hf hg n => (frobenius_add R p _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (hf n) (hg n) }
/-- The perfection of a ring `R` with characteristic `p`, as a subring,
defined to be the projective limit of `R` using the Frobenius maps `R → R`
indexed by the natural numbers, implemented as `{ f : ℕ → R | ∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n }`. -/
def Ring.perfectionSubring (R : Type u₁) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CharP R p] :
Subring (ℕ → R) :=
(Ring.perfectionSubsemiring R p).toSubring fun n => by
simp_rw [← frobenius_def, Pi.neg_apply, Pi.one_apply, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one]
/-- The perfection of a ring `R` with characteristic `p`,
defined to be the projective limit of `R` using the Frobenius maps `R → R`
indexed by the natural numbers, implemented as `{f : ℕ → R // ∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n}`. -/
def Ring.Perfection (R : Type u₁) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Type u₁ :=
{ f // ∀ n : ℕ, (f : ℕ → R) (n + 1) ^ p = f n }
namespace Perfection
variable (R : Type u₁) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CharP R p]
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring (Ring.Perfection R p) :=
(Ring.perfectionSubsemiring R p).toCommSemiring
instance charP : CharP (Ring.Perfection R p) p :=
CharP.subsemiring (ℕ → R) p (Ring.perfectionSubsemiring R p)
instance ring (R : Type u₁) [CommRing R] [CharP R p] : Ring (Ring.Perfection R p) :=
(Ring.perfectionSubring R p).toRing
instance commRing (R : Type u₁) [CommRing R] [CharP R p] : CommRing (Ring.Perfection R p) :=
(Ring.perfectionSubring R p).toCommRing
instance : Inhabited (Ring.Perfection R p) := ⟨0⟩
/-- The `n`-th coefficient of an element of the perfection. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : Ring.Perfection R p →+* R where
toFun f := f.1 n
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
variable {R p}
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Ring.Perfection R p} (h : ∀ n, coeff R p n f = coeff R p n g) : f = g :=
Subtype.eq <| funext h
variable (R p)
/-- The `p`-th root of an element of the perfection. -/
def pthRoot : Ring.Perfection R p →+* Ring.Perfection R p where
toFun f := ⟨fun n => coeff R p (n + 1) f, fun _ => f.2 _⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
variable {R p}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) (n : ℕ) : coeff R p n ⟨f, hf⟩ = f n := rfl
theorem coeff_pthRoot (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R p n (pthRoot R p f) = coeff R p (n + 1) f := rfl
theorem coeff_pow_p (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R p (n + 1) (f ^ p) = coeff R p n f := by rw [RingHom.map_pow]; exact f.2 n
theorem coeff_pow_p' (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n : ℕ) : coeff R p (n + 1) f ^ p = coeff R p n f :=
f.2 n
theorem coeff_frobenius (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R p (n + 1) (frobenius _ p f) = coeff R p n f := by apply coeff_pow_p f n
-- `coeff_pow_p f n` also works but is slow!
theorem coeff_iterate_frobenius (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n m : ℕ) :
coeff R p (n + m) ((frobenius _ p)^[m] f) = coeff R p n f :=
Nat.recOn m rfl fun m ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Nat.add_succ, coeff_frobenius, ih]
theorem coeff_iterate_frobenius' (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n m : ℕ) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
coeff R p n ((frobenius _ p)^[m] f) = coeff R p (n - m) f :=
Eq.symm <| (coeff_iterate_frobenius _ _ m).symm.trans <| (tsub_add_cancel_of_le hmn).symm ▸ rfl
theorem pthRoot_frobenius : (pthRoot R p).comp (frobenius _ p) = RingHom.id _ :=
RingHom.ext fun x =>
ext fun n => by rw [RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply, coeff_pthRoot, coeff_frobenius]
theorem frobenius_pthRoot : (frobenius _ p).comp (pthRoot R p) = RingHom.id _ :=
RingHom.ext fun x =>
ext fun n => by
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply, RingHom.map_frobenius, coeff_pthRoot,
← @RingHom.map_frobenius (Ring.Perfection R p) _ R, coeff_frobenius]
theorem coeff_add_ne_zero {f : Ring.Perfection R p} {n : ℕ} (hfn : coeff R p n f ≠ 0) (k : ℕ) :
coeff R p (n + k) f ≠ 0 :=
Nat.recOn k hfn fun k ih h => ih <| by
rw [Nat.add_succ] at h
rw [← coeff_pow_p, RingHom.map_pow, h, zero_pow hp.1.ne_zero]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_le {f : Ring.Perfection R p} {m n : ℕ} (hfm : coeff R p m f ≠ 0)
(hmn : m ≤ n) : coeff R p n f ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
hk.symm ▸ coeff_add_ne_zero hfm k
variable (R p)
instance perfectRing : PerfectRing (Ring.Perfection R p) p where
bijective_frobenius := Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr
⟨pthRoot R p,
DFunLike.congr_fun <| @frobenius_pthRoot R _ p _ _,
DFunLike.congr_fun <| @pthRoot_frobenius R _ p _ _⟩
/-- Given rings `R` and `S` of characteristic `p`, with `R` being perfect,
any homomorphism `R →+* S` can be lifted to a homomorphism `R →+* Perfection S p`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def lift (R : Type u₁) [CommSemiring R] [CharP R p] [PerfectRing R p]
(S : Type u₂) [CommSemiring S] [CharP S p] : (R →+* S) ≃ (R →+* Ring.Perfection S p) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun r => ⟨fun n => f (((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm : R →+* R)^[n] r),
fun n => by rw [← f.map_pow, Function.iterate_succ_apply', RingHom.coe_coe,
frobeniusEquiv_symm_pow_p]⟩
map_one' := ext fun _ => (congr_arg f <| iterate_map_one _ _).trans f.map_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ =>
ext fun _ => (congr_arg f <| iterate_map_mul _ _ _ _).trans <| f.map_mul _ _
map_zero' := ext fun _ => (congr_arg f <| iterate_map_zero _ _).trans f.map_zero
map_add' := fun _ _ =>
ext fun _ => (congr_arg f <| iterate_map_add _ _ _ _).trans <| f.map_add _ _ }
invFun := RingHom.comp <| coeff S p 0
left_inv _ := RingHom.ext fun _ => rfl
right_inv f := RingHom.ext fun r => ext fun n =>
show coeff S p 0 (f (((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm)^[n] r)) = coeff S p n (f r) by
rw [← coeff_iterate_frobenius _ 0 n, zero_add, ← RingHom.map_iterate_frobenius,
Function.RightInverse.iterate (frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm R p) n]
theorem hom_ext {R : Type u₁} [CommSemiring R] [CharP R p] [PerfectRing R p] {S : Type u₂}
[CommSemiring S] [CharP S p] {f g : R →+* Ring.Perfection S p}
(hfg : ∀ x, coeff S p 0 (f x) = coeff S p 0 (g x)) : f = g :=
(lift p R S).symm.injective <| RingHom.ext hfg
variable {R} {S : Type u₂} [CommSemiring S] [CharP S p]
/-- A ring homomorphism `R →+* S` induces `Perfection R p →+* Perfection S p`. -/
@[simps]
def map (φ : R →+* S) : Ring.Perfection R p →+* Ring.Perfection S p where
toFun f := ⟨fun n => φ (coeff R p n f), fun n => by rw [← φ.map_pow, coeff_pow_p']⟩
map_one' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => φ.map_one
map_mul' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => φ.map_mul _ _
map_zero' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => φ.map_zero
map_add' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => φ.map_add _ _
theorem coeff_map (φ : R →+* S) (f : Ring.Perfection R p) (n : ℕ) :
coeff S p n (map p φ f) = φ (coeff R p n f) := rfl
end Perfection
/-- A perfection map to a ring of characteristic `p` is a map that is isomorphic
to its perfection. -/
structure PerfectionMap (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {R : Type u₁} [CommSemiring R] [CharP R p]
{P : Type u₂} [CommSemiring P] [CharP P p] [PerfectRing P p] (π : P →+* R) : Prop where
injective : ∀ ⦃x y : P⦄,
(∀ n, π (((frobeniusEquiv P p).symm)^[n] x) = π (((frobeniusEquiv P p).symm)^[n] y)) → x = y
surjective : ∀ f : ℕ → R, (∀ n, f (n + 1) ^ p = f n) → ∃ x : P, ∀ n,
π (((frobeniusEquiv P p).symm)^[n] x) = f n
namespace PerfectionMap
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
variable {R : Type u₁} [CommSemiring R] [CharP R p]
variable {P : Type u₃} [CommSemiring P] [CharP P p] [PerfectRing P p]
/-- Create a `PerfectionMap` from an isomorphism to the perfection. -/
@[simps]
theorem mk' {f : P →+* R} (g : P ≃+* Ring.Perfection R p) (hfg : Perfection.lift p P R f = g) :
PerfectionMap p f :=
{ injective := fun x y hxy =>
g.injective <|
(RingHom.ext_iff.1 hfg x).symm.trans <|
Eq.symm <| (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hfg y).symm.trans <| Perfection.ext fun n => (hxy n).symm
surjective := fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := g.surjective ⟨y, hy⟩
⟨x, fun n =>
show Perfection.coeff R p n (Perfection.lift p P R f x) = Perfection.coeff R p n ⟨y, hy⟩ by
simp [hfg, hx]⟩ }
variable (p R P)
/-- The canonical perfection map from the perfection of a ring. -/
theorem of : PerfectionMap p (Perfection.coeff R p 0) :=
mk' (RingEquiv.refl _) <| (Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply _).2 rfl
/-- For a perfect ring, it itself is the perfection. -/
theorem id [PerfectRing R p] : PerfectionMap p (RingHom.id R) :=
{ injective := fun _ _ hxy => hxy 0
surjective := fun f hf =>
⟨f 0, fun n =>
show ((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm)^[n] (f 0) = f n from
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ih => injective_pow_p R p <| by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', frobeniusEquiv_symm_pow_p, ih, hf]⟩ }
variable {p R P}
| /-- A perfection map induces an isomorphism to the perfection. -/
noncomputable def equiv {π : P →+* R} (m : PerfectionMap p π) : P ≃+* Ring.Perfection R p :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective (Perfection.lift p P R π)
⟨fun _ _ hxy => m.injective fun n => (congr_arg (Perfection.coeff R p n) hxy :), fun f =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := m.surjective f.1 f.2
⟨x, Perfection.ext <| hx⟩⟩
theorem equiv_apply {π : P →+* R} (m : PerfectionMap p π) (x : P) :
m.equiv x = Perfection.lift p P R π x := rfl
theorem comp_equiv {π : P →+* R} (m : PerfectionMap p π) (x : P) :
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Perfection.lean | 249 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
@[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
exacts [basis_zero W, basis_one W]
variable {W} in
lemma smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) : x • y = mk W (C x) * y :=
(algebraMap_smul W.CoordinateRing x y).symm
variable {W} in
lemma smul_basis_eq_zero {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = 0) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := by
have h := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.mp (CoordinateRing.basis W).linearIndependent ![p, q]
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, basis_zero, Fin.sum_univ_one, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨h hpq 0, h hpq 1⟩
variable {W} in
lemma exists_smul_basis_eq (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
∃ p q : R[X], p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = x := by
have h := (CoordinateRing.basis W).sum_equivFun x
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_one, basis_zero, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
lemma smul_basis_mul_C (y : R[X]) (p q : R[X]) :
(p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W (C y) =
(p * y) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + (q * y) • mk W Y := by
simp only [smul, map_mul]
ring1
lemma smul_basis_mul_Y (p q : R[X]) : (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W Y =
(q * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) +
(p - q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)) • mk W Y := by
have Y_sq : mk W Y ^ 2 =
mk W (C (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) * Y) := by
exact AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [polynomial]; ring1⟩
simp only [smul, add_mul, mul_assoc, ← sq, Y_sq, C_sub, map_sub, C_mul, map_mul]
ring1
/-- The ring homomorphism `R[W] →+* S[W.map f]` induced by a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`. -/
noncomputable def map : W.CoordinateRing →+* (W.map f).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.lift ((AdjoinRoot.of _).comp <| mapRingHom f)
((AdjoinRoot.root (WeierstrassCurve.map W f).toAffine.polynomial)) <| by
rw [← eval₂_map, ← map_polynomial, AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root]
lemma map_mk (x : R[X][Y]) : map W f (mk W x) = mk (W.map f) (x.map <| mapRingHom f) := by
rw [map, AdjoinRoot.lift_mk, ← eval₂_map]
exact AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq <| x.map <| mapRingHom f
variable {W} in
protected lemma map_smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) :
map W f (x • y) = x.map f • map W f y := by
rw [smul, map_mul, map_mk, map_C, smul]
rfl
variable {f} in
lemma map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective <| map W f :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun y hy => by
obtain ⟨p, q, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_basis_eq y
simp_rw [map_add, CoordinateRing.map_smul, map_one, map_mk, map_X] at hy
obtain ⟨hp, hq⟩ := smul_basis_eq_zero hy
rw [Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf] at hp hq
simp_rw [hp, hq, zero_smul, add_zero]
instance [IsDomain R] : IsDomain W.CoordinateRing :=
have : IsDomain (W.map <| algebraMap R <| FractionRing R).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.isDomain_of_prime irreducible_polynomial.prime
(map_injective W <| IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R).isDomain
end Algebra
|
section Ring
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 203 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Tape
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Computability.PostTuringMachine
/-!
# Turing machines
The files `PostTuringMachine.lean` and `TuringMachine.lean` define
a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
`PostTuringMachine.lean` covers the TM0 model and TM1 model;
`TuringMachine.lean` adds the TM2 model.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-!
## The TM2 model
The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model, replacing it with an arbitrary (finite)
collection of stacks, each with elements of different types (the alphabet of stack `k : K` is
`Γ k`). The statements are:
* `push k (f : σ → Γ k) q` puts `f a` on the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `pop k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, and removes this element from the stack, then does `q`.
* `peek k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `load (f : σ → σ) q` reads nothing but applies `f` to the internal state, then does `q`.
* `branch (f : σ → Bool) qtrue qfalse` does `qtrue` or `qfalse` according to `f a`.
* `goto (f : σ → Λ)` jumps to label `f a`.
* `halt` halts on the next step.
The configuration is a tuple `(l, var, stk)` where `l : Option Λ` is the current label to run or
`none` for the halting state, `var : σ` is the (finite) internal state, and `stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)`
is the collection of stacks. (Note that unlike the `TM0` and `TM1` models, these are not
`ListBlank`s, they have definite ends that can be detected by the `pop` command.)
Given a designated stack `k` and a value `L : List (Γ k)`, the initial configuration has all the
stacks empty except the designated "input" stack; in `eval` this designated stack also functions
as the output stack.
-/
namespace TM2
variable {K : Type*}
-- Index type of stacks
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
-- Type of stack elements
variable (Λ : Type*)
-- Type of function labels
variable (σ : Type*)
-- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model,
replacing it with an arbitrary (finite) collection of stacks.
The operation `push` puts an element on one of the stacks,
and `pop` removes an element from a stack (and modifying the
internal state based on the result). `peek` modifies the
internal state but does not remove an element. -/
inductive Stmt
| push : ∀ k, (σ → Γ k) → Stmt → Stmt
| peek : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| pop : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| load : (σ → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| branch : (σ → Bool) → Stmt → Stmt → Stmt
| goto : (σ → Λ) → Stmt
| halt : Stmt
open Stmt
instance Stmt.inhabited : Inhabited (Stmt Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨halt⟩
/-- A configuration in the TM2 model is a label (or `none` for the halt state), the state of
local variables, and the stacks. (Note that the stacks are not `ListBlank`s, they have a definite
size.) -/
structure Cfg where
/-- The current label to run (or `none` for the halting state) -/
l : Option Λ
/-- The internal state -/
var : σ
/-- The (finite) collection of internal stacks -/
stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)
instance Cfg.inhabited [Inhabited σ] : Inhabited (Cfg Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {Γ Λ σ}
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def stepAux : Stmt Γ Λ σ → σ → (∀ k, List (Γ k)) → Cfg Γ Λ σ
| push k f q, v, S => stepAux q v (update S k (f v :: S k))
| peek k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) S
| pop k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) (update S k (S k).tail)
| load a q, v, S => stepAux q (a v) S
| branch f q₁ q₂, v, S => cond (f v) (stepAux q₁ v S) (stepAux q₂ v S)
| goto f, v, S => ⟨some (f v), v, S⟩
| halt, v, S => ⟨none, v, S⟩
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Option (Cfg Γ Λ σ)
| ⟨none, _, _⟩ => none
| ⟨some l, v, S⟩ => some (stepAux (M l) v S)
attribute [simp] stepAux.eq_1 stepAux.eq_2 stepAux.eq_3
stepAux.eq_4 stepAux.eq_5 stepAux.eq_6 stepAux.eq_7 step.eq_1 step.eq_2
/-- The (reflexive) reachability relation for the TM2 model. -/
def Reaches (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Cfg Γ Λ σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ step M a
end
/-- Given a set `S` of states, `SupportsStmt S q` means that `q` only jumps to states in `S`. -/
def SupportsStmt (S : Finset Λ) : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Prop
| push _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| peek _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| pop _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| load _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| branch _ q₁ q₂ => SupportsStmt S q₁ ∧ SupportsStmt S q₂
| goto l => ∀ v, l v ∈ S
| halt => True
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of subtree statements in a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Stmt Γ Λ σ)
| Q@(push _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(peek _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(pop _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch _ q₁ q₂) => insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(goto _) => {Q}
| Q@halt => {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q ∈ stmts₁ q := by
cases q <;> simp only [Finset.mem_insert_self, Finset.mem_singleton_self, stmts₁]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ := by
classical
intro h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁
induction q₂ with (
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_union] at h₁₂)
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_left _ (IH₁ h₁₂))
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_right _ (IH₂ h₁₂))
| goto l => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| halt => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| load _ q IH | _ _ _ q IH =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂)
theorem stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂)
(hs : SupportsStmt S q₂) : SupportsStmt S q₁ := by
induction q₂ with
simp only [stmts₁, SupportsStmt, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h hs
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ => rcases h with (rfl | h | h); exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2]
| goto l => subst h; exact hs
| halt => subst h; trivial
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => rcases h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact hs; exact IH h hs]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of statements accessible from initial set `S` of labels. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Option (Stmt Γ Λ σ)) :=
Finset.insertNone (S.biUnion fun q ↦ stmts₁ (M q))
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) :
some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h₂ ↦ ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
end
variable [Inhabited Λ]
/-- Given a TM2 machine `M` and a set `S` of states, `Supports M S` means that all states in
`S` jump only to other states in `S`. -/
def Supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) :=
default ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, SupportsStmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supportsStmt {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ}
(ss : Supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → SupportsStmt S q := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h ↦ stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
variable [DecidableEq K]
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) {S : Finset Λ} (ss : Supports M S) :
∀ {c c' : Cfg Γ Λ σ}, c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S → c'.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩, c', h₁, h₂ => by
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (Finset.some_mem_insertNone.1 h₂)
simp only [step, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h₁; subst c'
revert h₂; induction M l₁ generalizing v T with intro hs
| branch p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold stepAux; cases p v
· exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2
· exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1
| goto => exact Finset.some_mem_insertNone.2 (hs _)
| halt => apply Multiset.mem_cons_self
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => exact IH _ _ hs
variable [Inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state of the TM2 model. The input is provided on a designated stack. -/
def init (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Cfg Γ Λ σ :=
⟨some default, default, update (fun _ ↦ []) k L⟩
/-- Evaluates a TM2 program to completion, with the output on the same stack as the input. -/
def eval (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Part (List (Γ k)) :=
(Turing.eval (step M) (init k L)).map fun c ↦ c.stk k
end TM2
/-!
## TM2 emulator in TM1
To prove that TM2 computable functions are TM1 computable, we need to reduce each TM2 program to a
TM1 program. So suppose a TM2 program is given. This program has to maintain a whole collection of
stacks, but we have only one tape, so we must "multiplex" them all together. Pictorially, if stack
1 contains `[a, b]` and stack 2 contains `[c, d, e, f]` then the tape looks like this:
```
bottom: ... | _ | T | _ | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 1: ... | _ | b | a | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 2: ... | _ | f | e | d | c | _ | ...
```
where a tape element is a vertical slice through the diagram. Here the alphabet is
`Γ' := Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)`, where:
* `bottom : Bool` is marked only in one place, the initial position of the TM, and represents the
tail of all stacks. It is never modified.
* `stk k : Option (Γ k)` is the value of the `k`-th stack, if in range, otherwise `none` (which is
the blank value). Note that the head of the stack is at the far end; this is so that push and pop
don't have to do any shifting.
In "resting" position, the TM is sitting at the position marked `bottom`. For non-stack actions,
it operates in place, but for the stack actions `push`, `peek`, and `pop`, it must shuttle to the
end of the appropriate stack, make its changes, and then return to the bottom. So the states are:
* `normal (l : Λ)`: waiting at `bottom` to execute function `l`
* `go k (s : StAct k) (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the right to get to the end of stack `k` in
order to perform stack action `s`, and later continue with executing `q`
* `ret (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the left after having performed a stack action, and executing
`q` once we arrive
Because of the shuttling, emulation overhead is `O(n)`, where `n` is the current maximum of the
length of all stacks. Therefore a program that takes `k` steps to run in TM2 takes `O((m+k)k)`
steps to run when emulated in TM1, where `m` is the length of the input.
-/
namespace TM2to1
-- A displaced lemma proved in unnecessary generality
theorem stk_nth_val {K : Type*} {Γ : K → Type*} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} {k S} (n)
(hL : ListBlank.map (proj k) L = ListBlank.mk (List.map some S).reverse) :
L.nth n k = S.reverse[n]? := by
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ← List.map_reverse, ListBlank.nth_mk,
List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.getElem?_map]
cases S.reverse[n]? <;> rfl
variable (K : Type*)
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
variable {Λ σ : Type*}
/-- The alphabet of the TM2 simulator on TM1 is a marker for the stack bottom,
plus a vector of stack elements for each stack, or none if the stack does not extend this far. -/
def Γ' :=
Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)
variable {K Γ}
instance Γ'.inhabited : Inhabited (Γ' K Γ) :=
⟨⟨false, fun _ ↦ none⟩⟩
instance Γ'.fintype [DecidableEq K] [Fintype K] [∀ k, Fintype (Γ k)] : Fintype (Γ' K Γ) :=
instFintypeProd _ _
/-- The bottom marker is fixed throughout the calculation, so we use the `addBottom` function
to express the program state in terms of a tape with only the stacks themselves. -/
def addBottom (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : ListBlank (Γ' K Γ) :=
ListBlank.cons (true, L.head) (L.tail.map ⟨Prod.mk false, rfl⟩)
theorem addBottom_map (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(addBottom L).map ⟨Prod.snd, by rfl⟩ = L := by
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.map_cons]
convert ListBlank.cons_head_tail L
generalize ListBlank.tail L = L'
refine L'.induction_on fun l ↦ ?_; simp
theorem addBottom_modifyNth (f : (∀ k, Option (Γ k)) → ∀ k, Option (Γ k))
(L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
(addBottom L).modifyNth (fun a ↦ (a.1, f a.2)) n = addBottom (L.modifyNth f n) := by
cases n <;>
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.tail_cons]
congr; symm; apply ListBlank.map_modifyNth; intro; rfl
theorem addBottom_nth_snd (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth n).2 = L.nth n := by
conv => rhs; rw [← addBottom_map L, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_nth_succ_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth (n + 1)).1 = false := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, addBottom, ListBlank.tail_cons, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_head_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : (addBottom L).head.1 = true := by
rw [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons]
variable (K Γ σ) in
/-- A stack action is a command that interacts with the top of a stack. Our default position
is at the bottom of all the stacks, so we have to hold on to this action while going to the end
to modify the stack. -/
inductive StAct (k : K)
| push : (σ → Γ k) → StAct k
| peek : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
| pop : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
instance StAct.inhabited {k : K} : Inhabited (StAct K Γ σ k) :=
⟨StAct.peek fun s _ ↦ s⟩
section
open StAct
/-- The TM2 statement corresponding to a stack action. -/
def stRun {k : K} : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ
| push f => TM2.Stmt.push k f
| peek f => TM2.Stmt.peek k f
| pop f => TM2.Stmt.pop k f
/-- The effect of a stack action on the local variables, given the value of the stack. -/
def stVar {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → σ
| push _ => v
| peek f => f v l.head?
| pop f => f v l.head?
/-- The effect of a stack action on the stack. -/
def stWrite {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → List (Γ k)
| push f => f v :: l
| peek _ => l
| pop _ => l.tail
/-- We have partitioned the TM2 statements into "stack actions", which require going to the end
of the stack, and all other actions, which do not. This is a modified recursor which lumps the
stack actions into one. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def stmtStRec.{l} {motive : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Sort l}
(run : ∀ (k) (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q) (_ : motive q), motive (stRun s q))
(load : ∀ (a q) (_ : motive q), motive (TM2.Stmt.load a q))
(branch : ∀ (p q₁ q₂) (_ : motive q₁) (_ : motive q₂), motive (TM2.Stmt.branch p q₁ q₂))
(goto : ∀ l, motive (TM2.Stmt.goto l)) (halt : motive TM2.Stmt.halt) : ∀ n, motive n
| TM2.Stmt.push _ f q => run _ (push f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.peek _ f q => run _ (peek f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.pop _ f q => run _ (pop f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => load _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ =>
branch _ _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₁) (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto _ => goto _
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem supports_run (S : Finset Λ) {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
TM2.SupportsStmt S (stRun s q) ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S q := by
cases s <;> rfl
end
variable (K Γ Λ σ)
/-- The machine states of the TM2 emulator. We can either be in a normal state when waiting for the
next TM2 action, or we can be in the "go" and "return" states to go to the top of the stack and
return to the bottom, respectively. -/
inductive Λ'
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| go (k : K) : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
| ret : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
variable {K Γ Λ σ}
open Λ'
instance Λ'.inhabited [Inhabited Λ] : Inhabited (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨normal default⟩
open TM1.Stmt
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The program corresponding to state transitions at the end of a stack. Here we start out just
after the top of the stack, and should end just after the new top of the stack. -/
def trStAct {k : K} (q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) :
StAct K Γ σ k → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| StAct.push f => (write fun a s ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k <| some <| f s)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.peek f => move Dir.left <| (load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.pop f =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (load (fun _ s ↦ f s none) q)
(move Dir.left <|
(load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| write (fun a _ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none)) q)
/-- The initial state for the TM2 emulator, given an initial TM2 state. All stacks start out empty
except for the input stack, and the stack bottom mark is set at the head. -/
def trInit (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : List (Γ' K Γ) :=
let L' : List (Γ' K Γ) := L.reverse.map fun a ↦ (false, update (fun _ ↦ none) k (some a))
(true, L'.headI.2) :: L'.tail
theorem step_run {k : K} (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) (v : σ) (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) : ∀ s : StAct K Γ σ k,
TM2.stepAux (stRun s q) v S = TM2.stepAux q (stVar v (S k) s) (update S k (stWrite v (S k) s))
| StAct.push _ => rfl
| StAct.peek f => by unfold stWrite; rw [Function.update_eq_self]; rfl
| StAct.pop _ => rfl
end
/-- The translation of TM2 statements to TM1 statements. regular actions have direct equivalents,
but stack actions are deferred by going to the corresponding `go` state, so that we can find the
appropriate stack top. -/
def trNormal : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.push f) q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.peek f) q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.pop f) q
| TM2.Stmt.load a q => load (fun _ ↦ a) (trNormal q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch f q₁ q₂ => branch (fun _ ↦ f) (trNormal q₁) (trNormal q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto l => goto fun _ s ↦ normal (l s)
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem trNormal_run {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
trNormal (stRun s q) = goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q := by
cases s <;> rfl
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of machine states accessible from an initial TM2 statement. -/
noncomputable def trStmts₁ : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ)
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => {go k (StAct.push f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => {go k (StAct.peek f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => {go k (StAct.pop f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ => trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ trStmts₁ q₂
| _ => ∅
theorem trStmts₁_run {k : K} {s : StAct K Γ σ k} {q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ} :
open scoped Classical in
trStmts₁ (stRun s q) = {go k s q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q := by
cases s <;> simp only [trStmts₁, stRun]
theorem tr_respects_aux₂ [DecidableEq K] {k : K} {q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ} {v : σ}
{S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : ∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) (o : StAct K Γ σ k) :
let v' := stVar v (S k) o
let Sk' := stWrite v (S k) o
let S' := update S k Sk'
∃ L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k)),
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S' k).map some).reverse) ∧
TM1.stepAux (trStAct q o) v
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))) =
TM1.stepAux q v' ((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S' k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L'))) := by
simp only [Function.update_self]; cases o with simp only [stWrite, stVar, trStAct, TM1.stepAux]
| push f =>
have := Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k (some (f v)))
refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
-- Porting note: `rw [...]` to `erw [...]; rfl`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5164
rw [Tape.move_right_n_head, List.length, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, this]
erw [addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k (some (f v))]
rw [Nat.add_one, iterate_succ']
rfl⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h
<;> simp only [List.reverse_cons, Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.map]
· rw [List.getI_eq_getElem _, List.getElem_append_right] <;>
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_reverse, List.length_map, ← h,
Nat.sub_self, List.length_singleton, List.getElem_singleton,
le_refl, Nat.lt_succ_self]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
| peek f =>
rw [Function.update_eq_self]
use L, hL; rw [Tape.move_left_right]; congr
cases e : S k; · rfl
rw [List.length_cons, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left,
Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd, stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length]
rfl
| pop f =>
rcases e : S k with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp only [Tape.mk'_head, ListBlank.head_cons, Tape.move_left_mk', List.length,
Tape.write_mk', List.head?, iterate_zero_apply, List.tail_nil]
rw [← e, Function.update_eq_self]
exact ⟨L, hL, by rw [addBottom_head_fst, cond]⟩
· refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
erw [List.length_cons, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_succ_fst,
cond_false, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left, Tape.move_right_n_head,
Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none),
addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k none, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
show (List.cons hd tl).reverse[tl.length]? = some hd by
rw [List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length],
List.head?, List.tail]⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.tail]
· rw [List.getI_eq_default]
· rfl
rw [h, List.length_reverse, List.length_map]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk, e, List.map, List.reverse_cons]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
end
variable [DecidableEq K]
variable (M : Λ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ)
/-- The TM2 emulator machine states written as a TM1 program.
This handles the `go` and `ret` states, which shuttle to and from a stack top. -/
def tr : Λ' K Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| normal q => trNormal (M q)
| go k s q =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ (a.2 k).isNone) (trStAct (goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q) s)
(move Dir.right <| goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q)
| ret q => branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (trNormal q) (move Dir.left <| goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q)
/-- The relation between TM2 configurations and TM1 configurations of the TM2 emulator. -/
inductive TrCfg : TM2.Cfg Γ Λ σ → TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ → Prop
| mk {q : Option Λ} {v : σ} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
TrCfg ⟨q, v, S⟩ ⟨q.map normal, v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
theorem tr_respects_aux₁ {k} (o q v) {S : List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk (S.map some).reverse) (n) (H : n ≤ S.length) :
Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M)) ⟨some (go k o q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
⟨some (go k o q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
apply (IH (le_of_lt H)).tail
rw [iterate_succ_apply']
simp only [TM1.step, TM1.stepAux, tr, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.move_right_n_head,
addBottom_nth_snd, Option.mem_def]
rw [stk_nth_val _ hL, List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
· rfl
· rwa [List.length_reverse]
theorem tr_respects_aux₃ {q v} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} (n) : Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M))
⟨some (ret q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩
⟨some (ret q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
refine Reaches₀.head ?_ IH
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM1.step]
rw [Option.some_inj, tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat,
addBottom_nth_succ_fst, TM1.stepAux, iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply, Tape.move_right_left]
rfl
theorem tr_respects_aux {q v T k} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)}
(hT : ∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse)
(o : StAct K Γ σ k)
(IH : ∀ {v : σ} {S : ∀ k : K, List (Γ k)} {T : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))},
(∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux q v S) b ∧
Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) (TM1.stepAux (trNormal q) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b) :
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux (stRun o q) v S) b ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M))
(TM1.stepAux (trNormal (stRun o q)) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b := by
simp only [trNormal_run, step_run]
have hgo := tr_respects_aux₁ M o q v (hT k) _ le_rfl
obtain ⟨T', hT', hrun⟩ := tr_respects_aux₂ (Λ := Λ) hT o
have := hgo.tail' rfl
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hT k), List.getElem?_eq_none (le_of_eq List.length_reverse),
Option.isNone, cond, hrun, TM1.stepAux] at this
obtain ⟨c, gc, rc⟩ := IH hT'
refine ⟨c, gc, (this.to₀.trans (tr_respects_aux₃ M _) c (TransGen.head' rfl ?_)).to_reflTransGen⟩
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.mk'_head, addBottom_head_fst]
exact rc
attribute [local simp] Respects TM2.step TM2.stepAux trNormal
theorem tr_respects : Respects (TM2.step M) (TM1.step (tr M)) TrCfg := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
intro c₁ c₂ h
obtain @⟨- | l, v, S, L, hT⟩ := h; · constructor
rsuffices ⟨b, c, r⟩ : ∃ b, _ ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) _ _
· exact ⟨b, c, TransGen.head' rfl r⟩
simp only [tr]
generalize M l = N
induction N using stmtStRec generalizing v S L hT with
| run k s q IH => exact tr_respects_aux M hT s @IH
| load a _ IH => exact IH _ hT
| branch p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold TM2.stepAux trNormal TM1.stepAux
beta_reduce
cases p v <;> [exact IH₂ _ hT; exact IH₁ _ hT]
| goto => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
| halt => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
section
variable [Inhabited Λ] [Inhabited σ]
theorem trCfg_init (k) (L : List (Γ k)) : TrCfg (TM2.init k L)
(TM1.init (trInit k L) : TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) := by
rw [(_ : TM1.init _ = _)]
· refine ⟨ListBlank.mk (L.reverse.map fun a ↦ update default k (some a)), fun k' ↦ ?_⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.map_mk, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map_map]
have : ((proj k').f ∘ fun a => update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a))
= fun a => (proj k').f (update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a)) := rfl
rw [this, List.getElem?_map, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
simp only []
by_cases h : k' = k
· subst k'
simp only [Function.update_self]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, ← List.map_reverse, List.getElem?_map]
· simp only [Function.update_of_ne h]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map, List.reverse_nil]
cases L.reverse[i]? <;> rfl
· rw [trInit, TM1.init]
congr <;> cases L.reverse <;> try rfl
simp only [List.map_map, List.tail_cons, List.map]
rfl
theorem tr_eval_dom (k) (L : List (Γ k)) :
(TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L)).Dom ↔ (TM2.eval M k L).Dom :=
Turing.tr_eval_dom (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L)
theorem tr_eval (k) (L : List (Γ k)) {L₁ L₂} (H₁ : L₁ ∈ TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L))
(H₂ : L₂ ∈ TM2.eval M k L) :
∃ (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) (L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))),
addBottom L' = L₁ ∧
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) ∧ S k = L₂ := by
obtain ⟨c₁, h₁, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₁
obtain ⟨c₂, h₂, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₂
obtain ⟨_, ⟨L', hT⟩, h₃⟩ := Turing.tr_eval (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L) h₂
cases Part.mem_unique h₁ h₃
exact ⟨_, L', by simp only [Tape.mk'_right₀], hT, rfl⟩
end
section
variable [Inhabited Λ]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The support of a set of TM2 states in the TM2 emulator. -/
noncomputable def trSupp (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
S.biUnion fun l ↦ insert (normal l) (trStmts₁ (M l))
open scoped Classical in
theorem tr_supports {S} (ss : TM2.Supports M S) : TM1.Supports (tr M) (trSupp M S) :=
⟨Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss.1, Finset.mem_insert.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩, fun l' h ↦ by
suffices ∀ (q) (_ : TM2.SupportsStmt S q) (_ : ∀ x ∈ trStmts₁ q, x ∈ trSupp M S),
TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (trNormal q) ∧
∀ l' ∈ trStmts₁ q, TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (tr M l') by
rcases Finset.mem_biUnion.1 h with ⟨l, lS, h⟩
have :=
this _ (ss.2 l lS) fun x hx ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, lS, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hx⟩
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact this.1; exact this.2 _ h]
clear h l'
refine stmtStRec ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro _ s _ IH ss' sub -- stack op
rw [TM2to1.supports_run] at ss'
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at sub
have hgo := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inl rfl)
have hret := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inr rfl)
obtain ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ := IH ss' fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Or.inr hx
refine ⟨by simp only [trNormal_run, TM1.SupportsStmt]; intros; exact hgo, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁_run] at h
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h
rcases h with (⟨rfl | rfl⟩ | h)
· cases s
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· unfold TM1.SupportsStmt TM2to1.tr
exact ⟨IH₁, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩
· exact IH₂ _ h
· intro _ _ IH ss' sub -- load
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub ⊢
exact IH ss' sub
· intro _ _ _ IH₁ IH₂ ss' sub -- branch
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub
obtain ⟨IH₁₁, IH₁₂⟩ := IH₁ ss'.1 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_left _ hx
obtain ⟨IH₂₁, IH₂₂⟩ := IH₂ ss'.2 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_right _ hx
refine ⟨⟨IH₁₁, IH₂₁⟩, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁] at h
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 h with (h | h) <;> [exact IH₁₂ _ h; exact IH₂₂ _ h]
· intro _ ss' _ -- goto
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]; refine ⟨?_, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩
exact fun _ v ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss' v, Finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· intro _ _ -- halt
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]
exact ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩⟩
end
end TM2to1
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 976 | 979 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
| rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 427 | 431 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.List
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Enum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
/-!
# Fixed points of normal functions
We prove various statements about the fixed points of normal ordinal functions. We state them in
three forms: as statements about type-indexed families of normal functions, as statements about
ordinal-indexed families of normal functions, and as statements about a single normal function. For
the most part, the first case encompasses the others.
Moreover, we prove some lemmas about the fixed points of specific normal functions.
## Main definitions and results
* `nfpFamily`, `nfp`: the next fixed point of a (family of) normal function(s).
* `not_bddAbove_fp_family`, `not_bddAbove_fp`: the (common) fixed points of a (family of) normal
function(s) are unbounded in the ordinals.
* `deriv_add_eq_mul_omega0_add`: a characterization of the derivative of addition.
* `deriv_mul_eq_opow_omega0_mul`: a characterization of the derivative of multiplication.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Function Order
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Fixed points of type-indexed families of ordinals -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}}
/-- The next common fixed point, at least `a`, for a family of normal functions.
This is defined for any family of functions, as the supremum of all values reachable by applying
finitely many functions in the family to `a`.
`Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp` shows this is a fixed point, `Ordinal.le_nfpFamily` shows it's at
least `a`, and `Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp` shows this is the least ordinal with these properties. -/
def nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal :=
⨆ i, List.foldr f a i
theorem foldr_le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a l) :
List.foldr f a l ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
Ordinal.le_iSup _ _
theorem le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a) : a ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
foldr_le_nfpFamily f a []
theorem lt_nfpFamily_iff [Small.{u} ι] {a b} : a < nfpFamily f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr f b l :=
Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")]
alias lt_nfpFamily := lt_nfpFamily_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le_iff [Small.{u} ι] {a b} : nfpFamily f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b :=
Ordinal.iSup_le_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le {a b} : (∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b) → nfpFamily f a ≤ b :=
Ordinal.iSup_le
theorem nfpFamily_monotone [Small.{u} ι] (hf : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) : Monotone (nfpFamily f) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ nfpFamily_le <| fun l ↦ (List.foldr_monotone hf l h).trans (foldr_le_nfpFamily _ _ l)
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b}
(hb : b < nfpFamily f a) (i) : f i b < nfpFamily f a :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily_iff.1 hb
lt_nfpFamily_iff.2 ⟨i::l, (H i).strictMono hl⟩
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff [Nonempty ι] [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b < nfpFamily f a) ↔ b < nfpFamily f a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, apply_lt_nfpFamily H⟩
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily_iff.1 (h (Classical.arbitrary ι))
exact lt_nfpFamily_iff.2 <| ⟨l, (H _).le_apply.trans_lt hl⟩
theorem nfpFamily_le_apply [Nonempty ι] [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∃ i, nfpFamily f a ≤ f i b) ↔ nfpFamily f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff H
theorem nfpFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ i, f i b ≤ b) :
nfpFamily f a ≤ b := by
apply Ordinal.iSup_le
intro l
induction' l with i l IH generalizing a
· exact ab
· exact (H i (IH ab)).trans (h i)
theorem nfpFamily_fp [Small.{u} ι] {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (a) :
f i (nfpFamily f a) = nfpFamily f a := by
rw [nfpFamily, H.map_iSup]
apply le_antisymm <;> refine Ordinal.iSup_le fun l => ?_
· exact Ordinal.le_iSup _ (i::l)
· exact H.le_apply.trans (Ordinal.le_iSup _ _)
theorem apply_le_nfpFamily [Small.{u} ι] [hι : Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b ≤ nfpFamily f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpFamily f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := hι
exact (H i).le_apply.trans (h i)
· rw [← nfpFamily_fp (H i)]
exact (H i).monotone h
theorem nfpFamily_eq_self [Small.{u} ι] {a} (h : ∀ i, f i a = a) : nfpFamily f a = a := by
apply (Ordinal.iSup_le ?_).antisymm (le_nfpFamily f a)
intro l
rw [List.foldr_fixed' h l]
-- Todo: This is actually a special case of the fact the intersection of club sets is a club set.
/-- A generalization of the fixed point lemma for normal functions: any family of normal functions
has an unbounded set of common fixed points. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_fp_family [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
¬ BddAbove (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [not_bddAbove_iff]
refine fun a ↦ ⟨nfpFamily f (succ a), ?_, (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_nfpFamily f _)⟩
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact nfpFamily_fp (H i) _
/-- The derivative of a family of normal functions is the sequence of their common fixed points.
This is defined for all functions such that `Ordinal.derivFamily_zero`,
`Ordinal.derivFamily_succ`, and `Ordinal.derivFamily_limit` are satisfied. -/
def derivFamily (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
limitRecOn o (nfpFamily f 0) (fun _ IH => nfpFamily f (succ IH))
fun a _ g => ⨆ b : Set.Iio a, g _ b.2
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_zero (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivFamily f 0 = nfpFamily f 0 :=
limitRecOn_zero ..
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_succ (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o) :
derivFamily f (succ o) = nfpFamily f (succ (derivFamily f o)) :=
limitRecOn_succ ..
theorem derivFamily_limit (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) {o} :
IsLimit o → derivFamily f o = ⨆ b : Set.Iio o, derivFamily f b :=
limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _
theorem isNormal_derivFamily [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
IsNormal (derivFamily f) := by
refine ⟨fun o ↦ ?_, fun o h a ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [derivFamily_succ, ← succ_le_iff]
exact le_nfpFamily _ _
· simp_rw [derivFamily_limit _ h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall, Set.mem_Iio]
theorem derivFamily_strictMono [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
StrictMono (derivFamily f) :=
(isNormal_derivFamily f).strictMono
theorem derivFamily_fp [Small.{u} ι] {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (o : Ordinal) :
f i (derivFamily f o) = derivFamily f o := by
induction' o using limitRecOn with o _ o l IH
· rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_fp H 0
· rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_fp H _
· have : Nonempty (Set.Iio o) := ⟨0, l.pos⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, H.map_iSup]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
refine forall_congr' fun a ↦ ?_
rw [IH _ a.2]
theorem le_iff_derivFamily [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily f o = a :=
⟨fun ha => by
suffices ∀ (o), a ≤ derivFamily f o → ∃ o, derivFamily f o = a from
this a (isNormal_derivFamily _).le_apply
intro o
induction' o using limitRecOn with o IH o l IH
· intro h₁
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (Ordinal.zero_le _) ha
· intro h₁
rcases le_or_lt a (derivFamily f o) with h | h
· exact IH h
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (succ_le_of_lt h) ha
· intro h₁
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with h | h
· exact ⟨_, h.symm⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, ← not_le, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨o', h⟩ := h
exact IH o' o'.2 (le_of_not_le h),
fun ⟨_, e⟩ i => e ▸ (derivFamily_fp (H i) _).le⟩
theorem fp_iff_derivFamily [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a = a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily f o = a :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h i => le_of_eq (h i), fun h i => (H i).le_iff_eq.1 (h i)⟩ (le_iff_derivFamily H)
/-- For a family of normal functions, `Ordinal.derivFamily` enumerates the common fixed points. -/
theorem derivFamily_eq_enumOrd [Small.{u} ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
derivFamily f = enumOrd (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [eq_comm, eq_enumOrd _ (not_bddAbove_fp_family H)]
use (isNormal_derivFamily f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun a ha => ?_⟩
· rintro a S ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [← hi]
exact derivFamily_fp (H i) a
rw [Set.mem_iInter] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivFamily H]
end
/-! ### Fixed points of a single function -/
section
variable {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}}
/-- The next fixed point function, the least fixed point of the normal function `f`, at least `a`.
This is defined as `nfpFamily` applied to a family consisting only of `f`. -/
def nfp (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f
theorem nfp_eq_nfpFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : nfp f = nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
theorem iSup_iterate_eq_nfp (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (a : Ordinal.{u}) :
⨆ n : ℕ, f^[n] a = nfp f a := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← List.length_replicate (n := n) (a := Unit.unit), ← List.foldr_const f a]
exact Ordinal.le_iSup _ _
· apply Ordinal.iSup_le
intro l
rw [List.foldr_const f a l]
exact Ordinal.le_iSup _ _
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a := by
rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact Ordinal.le_iSup (fun n ↦ f^[n] a) n
theorem le_nfp (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
theorem lt_nfp_iff {a b} : a < nfp f b ↔ ∃ n, a < f^[n] b := by
rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff
theorem nfp_le_iff {a b} : nfp f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b := by
rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact Ordinal.iSup_le_iff
theorem nfp_le {a b} : (∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b) → nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfp_le_iff.2
@[simp]
theorem nfp_id : nfp id = id := by
ext
simp_rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp, iterate_id]
exact ciSup_const
theorem nfp_monotone (hf : Monotone f) : Monotone (nfp f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf
theorem IsNormal.apply_lt_nfp (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a := by
unfold nfp
rw [← @apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff Unit (fun _ => f) _ _ (fun _ => H) a b]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
theorem IsNormal.nfp_le_apply (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.apply_lt_nfp
theorem nfp_le_fp (H : Monotone f) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H) ab fun _ => h
theorem IsNormal.nfp_fp (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ a, f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
@nfpFamily_fp Unit (fun _ => f) _ () H
theorem IsNormal.apply_le_nfp (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨H.le_apply.trans, fun h => by simpa only [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
theorem nfp_eq_self {a} (h : f a = a) : nfp f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h
/-- The fixed point lemma for normal functions: any normal function has an unbounded set of
fixed points. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_fp (H : IsNormal f) : ¬ BddAbove (Function.fixedPoints f) := by
convert not_bddAbove_fp_family fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
/-- The derivative of a normal function `f` is the sequence of fixed points of `f`.
This is defined as `Ordinal.derivFamily` applied to a trivial family consisting only of `f`. -/
def deriv (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f
theorem deriv_eq_derivFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : deriv f = derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero_right (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 :=
derivFamily_zero _
@[simp]
theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
derivFamily_succ _ _
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : IsLimit o → deriv f o = ⨆ a : {a // a < o}, deriv f a :=
derivFamily_limit _
theorem isNormal_deriv (f) : IsNormal (deriv f) :=
isNormal_derivFamily _
theorem deriv_strictMono (f) : StrictMono (deriv f) :=
derivFamily_strictMono _
theorem deriv_id_of_nfp_id (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
((isNormal_deriv _).eq_iff_zero_and_succ IsNormal.refl).2 (by simp [h])
theorem IsNormal.deriv_fp (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ o, f (deriv f o) = deriv f o :=
derivFamily_fp (i := ⟨⟩) H
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_deriv (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
unfold deriv
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily fun _ : Unit => H]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
theorem IsNormal.fp_iff_deriv (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a = a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
rw [← H.le_iff_eq, H.le_iff_deriv]
/-- `Ordinal.deriv` enumerates the fixed points of a normal function. -/
theorem deriv_eq_enumOrd (H : IsNormal f) : deriv f = enumOrd (Function.fixedPoints f) := by
convert derivFamily_eq_enumOrd fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
theorem deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
(IsNormal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ (isNormal_deriv _) IsNormal.refl).2 <| by simp [h]
theorem nfp_zero_left (a) : nfp 0 a = a := by
rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp]
apply (Ordinal.iSup_le ?_).antisymm (Ordinal.le_iSup _ 0)
intro n
cases n
· rfl
· rw [Function.iterate_succ']
simp
@[simp]
theorem nfp_zero : nfp 0 = id := by
ext
exact nfp_zero_left _
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero : deriv 0 = id :=
deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id nfp_zero
theorem deriv_zero_left (a) : deriv 0 a = a := by
rw [deriv_zero, id_eq]
end
/-! ### Fixed points of addition -/
@[simp]
theorem nfp_add_zero (a) : nfp (a + ·) 0 = a * ω := by
simp_rw [← iSup_iterate_eq_nfp, ← iSup_mul_nat]
congr; funext n
induction' n with n hn
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, iterate_zero_apply]
· rw [iterate_succ_apply', Nat.add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one_add, hn]
theorem nfp_add_eq_mul_omega0 {a b} (hba : b ≤ a * ω) : nfp (a + ·) b = a * ω := by
| apply le_antisymm (nfp_le_fp (isNormal_add_right a).monotone hba _)
· rw [← nfp_add_zero]
exact nfp_monotone (isNormal_add_right a).monotone (Ordinal.zero_le b)
· dsimp; rw [← mul_one_add, one_add_omega0]
theorem add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega0_le {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = b ↔ a * ω ≤ b := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPoint.lean | 384 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
/-!
# Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces.
Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
open Filter Function Set Uniformity Topology
section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β}
/-!
### Uniform inducing maps
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is called *uniform inducing* if the uniformity filter
on `α` is the pullback of the uniformity filter on `β` under `Prod.map f f`. If `α` is a separated
space, then this implies that `f` is injective, hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformInducing (f : α → β) : Prop where
/-- The uniformity filter on the domain is the pullback of the uniformity filter on the codomain
under `Prod.map f f`. -/
comap_uniformity : comap (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α
lemma isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f = ‹UniformSpace α› := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformSpace.ext_iff, Filter.ext_iff]
rfl
protected alias ⟨IsUniformInducing.comap_uniformSpace, _⟩ := isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace
lemma isUniformInducing_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformContinuous, tendsto_iff_comap, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]; rfl
protected lemma Filter.HasBasis.isUniformInducing_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp [isUniformInducing_iff', h.uniformContinuous_iff h', (h'.comap _).le_basis_iff h, subset_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.mk' {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, Filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.id : IsUniformInducing (@id α) :=
⟨by rw [← Prod.map_def, Prod.map_id, comap_id]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨by rw [← hf.1, ← hg.1, comap_comap]; rfl⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hg.comp⟩
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, ← h.comap_uniformity,
Function.comp_def, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.basis_uniformity {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {ι : Sort*}
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (H : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => Prod.map f f ⁻¹' s i :=
hf.1 ▸ H.comap _
theorem IsUniformInducing.cauchy_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {F : Filter α} :
Cauchy (map f F) ↔ Cauchy F := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap, ← hf.comap_uniformity]
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hgf : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f)) : IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ hf.le_comap⟩
rw [← hgf.1, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_comp_map f f g g, ← comap_comap]
exact comap_mono hg.le_comap
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
UniformContinuous f := (isUniformInducing_iff'.1 hf).1
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuous f ↔ UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuous, Tendsto]
simp only [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def]
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformInducing_comp_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
simp only [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {S : Set α}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (g ∘ f) S := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuousOn, Tendsto]
rw [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, comp_def, comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.isInducing {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) : IsInducing f := by
obtain rfl := h.comap_uniformSpace
exact .induced f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsUniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias UniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
theorem IsUniformInducing.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace α'] [UniformSpace β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : IsUniformInducing e₁) (h₂ : IsUniformInducing e₂) :
IsUniformInducing fun p : α × β => (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) :=
⟨by simp [Function.comp_def, uniformity_prod, ← h₁.1, ← h₂.1, comap_inf, comap_comap]⟩
lemma IsUniformInducing.isDenseInducing (h : IsUniformInducing f) (hd : DenseRange f) :
IsDenseInducing f where
toIsInducing := h.isInducing
dense := hd
lemma SeparationQuotient.isUniformInducing_mk :
IsUniformInducing (mk : α → SeparationQuotient α) :=
⟨comap_mk_uniformity⟩
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.injective [T0Space α] {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) :
Injective f :=
h.isInducing.injective
/-!
### Uniform embeddings
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is a *uniform embedding* if it is uniform inducing and
injective. If `α` is a separated space, then the latter assumption follows from the former. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformEmbedding (f : α → β) : Prop extends IsUniformInducing f where
/-- A uniform embedding is injective. -/
injective : Function.Injective f
lemma IsUniformEmbedding.isUniformInducing (hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformInducing f :=
hf.toIsUniformInducing
theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, isUniformInducing_iff']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, h.isUniformInducing_iff h']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp only [h.isUniformEmbedding_iff' h', h.uniformContinuous_iff h']
theorem isUniformEmbedding_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} :
IsUniformEmbedding (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) :=
{ comap_uniformity := rfl
injective := Subtype.val_injective }
theorem isUniformEmbedding_set_inclusion {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
IsUniformEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
comap_uniformity := by rw [uniformity_subtype, uniformity_subtype, comap_comap]; rfl
injective := inclusion_injective hst
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformEmbedding g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformEmbedding (g ∘ f) where
toIsUniformInducing := hg.isUniformInducing.comp hf.isUniformInducing
injective := hg.injective.comp hf.injective
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformEmbedding g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformEmbedding f := by
simp_rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, hg.isUniformInducing.of_comp_iff, hg.injective.of_comp_iff f]
theorem Equiv.isUniformEmbedding {α β : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] (f : α ≃ β)
(h₁ : UniformContinuous f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous f.symm) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨f.injective, h₁, by rwa [← Equiv.prodCongr_apply, ← map_equiv_symm]⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_inl : IsUniformEmbedding (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨Sum.inl_injective, uniformContinuous_inl, fun s hs =>
⟨Prod.map Sum.inl Sum.inl '' s ∪ range (Prod.map Sum.inr Sum.inr),
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map hs) range_mem_map,
fun x h => by simpa [Prod.map_apply'] using h⟩⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_inr : IsUniformEmbedding (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨Sum.inr_injective, uniformContinuous_inr, fun s hs =>
⟨range (Prod.map Sum.inl Sum.inl) ∪ Prod.map Sum.inr Sum.inr '' s,
union_mem_sup range_mem_map (image_mem_map hs),
fun x h => by simpa [Prod.map_apply'] using h⟩⟩
/-- If the domain of a `IsUniformInducing` map `f` is a T₀ space, then `f` is injective,
hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformEmbedding [T0Space α] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.isInducing.injective⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing [T0Space α] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨IsUniformEmbedding.isUniformInducing, IsUniformInducing.isUniformEmbedding⟩
/-- If a map `f : α → β` sends any two distinct points to point that are **not** related by a fixed
`s ∈ 𝓤 β`, then `f` is uniform inducing with respect to the discrete uniformity on `α`:
the preimage of `𝓤 β` under `Prod.map f f` is the principal filter generated by the diagonal in
`α × α`. -/
theorem comap_uniformity_of_spaced_out {α} {f : α → β} {s : Set (β × β)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β)
(hf : Pairwise fun x y => (f x, f y) ∉ s) : comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) = 𝓟 idRel := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (@refl_le_uniformity α (UniformSpace.comap f _))
calc
comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓟 s) := comap_mono (le_principal_iff.2 hs)
_ = 𝓟 (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' s) := comap_principal
_ ≤ 𝓟 idRel := principal_mono.2 ?_
rintro ⟨x, y⟩; simpa [not_imp_not] using @hf x y
/-- If a map `f : α → β` sends any two distinct points to point that are **not** related by a fixed
`s ∈ 𝓤 β`, then `f` is a uniform embedding with respect to the discrete uniformity on `α`. -/
theorem isUniformEmbedding_of_spaced_out {α} {f : α → β} {s : Set (β × β)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β)
(hf : Pairwise fun x y => (f x, f y) ∉ s) : @IsUniformEmbedding α β ⊥ ‹_› f := by
let _ : UniformSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
exact IsUniformInducing.isUniformEmbedding ⟨comap_uniformity_of_spaced_out hs hf⟩
protected lemma IsUniformEmbedding.isEmbedding {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
IsEmbedding f where
toIsInducing := h.toIsUniformInducing.isInducing
injective := h.injective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias IsUniformEmbedding.embedding := IsUniformEmbedding.isEmbedding
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.isDenseEmbedding {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformEmbedding f)
(hd : DenseRange f) : IsDenseEmbedding f :=
{ h.isEmbedding with dense := hd }
theorem isClosedEmbedding_of_spaced_out {α} [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α]
[T0Space β] {f : α → β} {s : Set (β × β)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β)
(hf : Pairwise fun x y => (f x, f y) ∉ s) : IsClosedEmbedding f := by
rcases @DiscreteTopology.eq_bot α _ _ with rfl; let _ : UniformSpace α := ⊥
exact
{ (isUniformEmbedding_of_spaced_out hs hf).isEmbedding with
isClosed_range := isClosed_range_of_spaced_out hs hf }
theorem closure_image_mem_nhds_of_isUniformInducing {s : Set (α × α)} {e : α → β} (b : β)
(he₁ : IsUniformInducing e) (he₂ : IsDenseInducing e) (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ a, closure (e '' { a' | (a, a') ∈ s }) ∈ 𝓝 b := by
obtain ⟨U, ⟨hU, hUo, hsymm⟩, hs⟩ :
∃ U, (U ∈ 𝓤 β ∧ IsOpen U ∧ IsSymmetricRel U) ∧ Prod.map e e ⁻¹' U ⊆ s := by
rwa [← he₁.comap_uniformity, (uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.comap _).mem_iff] at hs
rcases he₂.dense.mem_nhds (UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds b hU) with ⟨a, ha⟩
refine ⟨a, mem_of_superset ?_ (closure_mono <| image_subset _ <| UniformSpace.ball_mono hs a)⟩
have ho : IsOpen (UniformSpace.ball (e a) U) := UniformSpace.isOpen_ball (e a) hUo
refine mem_of_superset (ho.mem_nhds <| (UniformSpace.mem_ball_symmetry hsymm).2 ha) fun y hy => ?_
refine mem_closure_iff_nhds.2 fun V hV => ?_
rcases he₂.dense.mem_nhds (inter_mem hV (ho.mem_nhds hy)) with ⟨x, hxV, hxU⟩
exact ⟨e x, hxV, mem_image_of_mem e hxU⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_subtypeEmb (p : α → Prop) {e : α → β} (ue : IsUniformEmbedding e)
(de : IsDenseEmbedding e) : IsUniformEmbedding (IsDenseEmbedding.subtypeEmb p e) :=
{ comap_uniformity := by
simp [comap_comap, Function.comp_def, IsDenseEmbedding.subtypeEmb, uniformity_subtype,
ue.comap_uniformity.symm]
injective := (de.subtype p).injective }
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace α'] [UniformSpace β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : IsUniformEmbedding e₁) (h₂ : IsUniformEmbedding e₂) :
IsUniformEmbedding fun p : α × β => (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) where
toIsUniformInducing := h₁.isUniformInducing.prod h₂.isUniformInducing
injective := h₁.injective.prodMap h₂.injective
/-- A set is complete iff its image under a uniform inducing map is complete. -/
theorem isComplete_image_iff {m : α → β} {s : Set α} (hm : IsUniformInducing m) :
IsComplete (m '' s) ↔ IsComplete s := by
have fact1 : SurjOn (map m) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) (Iic <| 𝓟 <| m '' s) := surjOn_image .. |>.filter_map_Iic
have fact2 : MapsTo (map m) (Iic <| 𝓟 s) (Iic <| 𝓟 <| m '' s) := mapsTo_image .. |>.filter_map_Iic
simp_rw [IsComplete, imp.swap (a := Cauchy _), ← mem_Iic (b := 𝓟 _), fact1.forall fact2,
hm.cauchy_map_iff, exists_mem_image, map_le_iff_le_comap, hm.isInducing.nhds_eq_comap]
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `IsUniformInducing` map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is complete
if and only if `s` is complete. -/
theorem IsUniformInducing.isComplete_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
IsComplete (f '' s) ↔ IsComplete s := isComplete_image_iff hf
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `IsUniformEmbedding`, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is complete
if and only if `s` is complete. -/
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.isComplete_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
IsComplete (f '' s) ↔ IsComplete s := hf.isUniformInducing.isComplete_iff
/-- Sets of a subtype are complete iff their image under the coercion is complete. -/
theorem Subtype.isComplete_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set { x // p x }} :
IsComplete s ↔ IsComplete ((↑) '' s : Set α) :=
isUniformEmbedding_subtype_val.isComplete_iff.symm
alias ⟨isComplete_of_complete_image, _⟩ := isComplete_image_iff
theorem completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
CompleteSpace α ↔ IsComplete (range f) := by
rw [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, ← isComplete_image_iff hf, image_univ]
alias ⟨_, IsUniformInducing.completeSpace⟩ := completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range
lemma IsUniformInducing.isComplete_range [CompleteSpace α] (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
IsComplete (range f) :=
(completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range hf).1 ‹_›
/-- If `f` is a surjective uniform inducing map,
then its domain is a complete space iff its codomain is a complete space.
See also `_root_.completeSpace_congr` for a version that assumes `f` to be an equivalence. -/
theorem IsUniformInducing.completeSpace_congr {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f)
(hsurj : f.Surjective) : CompleteSpace α ↔ CompleteSpace β := by
rw [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range hf, hsurj.range_eq, completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ]
|
theorem SeparationQuotient.completeSpace_iff :
CompleteSpace (SeparationQuotient α) ↔ CompleteSpace α :=
.symm <| isUniformInducing_mk.completeSpace_congr surjective_mk
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformEmbedding.lean | 318 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : Fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives coefficients of a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : Fin 2 → Fin 2 → α`.
In later files we introduce `!![a, b; c, d]` as notation for `Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Main definitions
* `vecEmpty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vecCons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section MatrixNotation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α :=
Fin.elim0
/-- `vecCons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vecHead` and `vecTail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vecCons a (vecCons b ...)`.
-/
def vecCons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : Fin n → α) : Fin n.succ → α :=
Fin.cons h t
/-- `![...]` notation is used to construct a vector `Fin n → α` using `Matrix.vecEmpty` and
`Matrix.vecCons`.
For instance, `![a, b, c] : Fin 3` is syntax for `vecCons a (vecCons b (vecCons c vecEmpty))`.
Note that this should not be used as syntax for `Matrix` as it generates a term with the wrong type.
The `!![a, b; c, d]` syntax (provided by `Matrix.matrixNotation`) should be used instead.
-/
syntax (name := vecNotation) "![" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(![$term:term, $terms:term,*]) => `(vecCons $term ![$terms,*])
| `(![$term:term]) => `(vecCons $term ![])
| `(![]) => `(vecEmpty)
/-- Unexpander for the `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecCons]
def vecConsUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $term ![$term2, $terms,*]) => `(![$term, $term2, $terms,*])
| `($_ $term ![$term2]) => `(![$term, $term2])
| `($_ $term ![]) => `(![$term])
| _ => throw ()
/-- Unexpander for the `![]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecEmpty]
def vecEmptyUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_:ident) => `(![])
| _ => throw ()
/-- `vecHead v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vecHead {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
/-- `vecTail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vecTail {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : Fin n → α :=
v ∘ Fin.succ
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `Fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance _root_.PiFin.hasRepr [Repr α] : Repr (Fin n → α) where
reprPrec f _ :=
Std.Format.bracket "![" (Std.Format.joinSep
((List.finRange n).map fun n => repr (f n)) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
end MatrixNotation
variable {m n o : ℕ}
theorem empty_eq (v : Fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
section Val
@[simp]
theorem head_fin_const (a : α) : (vecHead fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u 0 = x :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (i : Fin m) : vecCons x u i.succ = u i := by
simp [vecCons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecCons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := by
simp only [vecCons, Fin.cons, Fin.cases_succ']
section simprocs
open Lean Qq
/-- Parses a chain of `Matrix.vecCons` calls into elements, leaving everything else in the tail.
|
`let ⟨xs, tailn, tail⟩ ← matchVecConsPrefix n e` decomposes `e : Fin n → _` in the form
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/VecNotation.lean | 141 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic
/-!
# Equivalence between `Multiset` and `ℕ`-valued finitely supported functions
This defines `Finsupp.toMultiset` the equivalence between `α →₀ ℕ` and `Multiset α`, along
with `Multiset.toFinsupp` the reverse equivalence and `Finsupp.orderIsoMultiset` (the equivalence
promoted to an order isomorphism).
-/
open Finset
variable {α β ι : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α →₀ ℕ`, `f.toMultiset` is the multiset with multiplicities given by the values of
`f` on the elements of `α`. We define this function as an `AddMonoidHom`.
Under the additional assumption of `[DecidableEq α]`, this is available as
`Multiset.toFinsupp : Multiset α ≃+ (α →₀ ℕ)`; the two declarations are separate as this assumption
is only needed for one direction. -/
def toMultiset : (α →₀ ℕ) →+ Multiset α where
toFun f := Finsupp.sum f fun a n => n • {a}
-- Porting note: have to specify `h` or add a `dsimp only` before `sum_add_index'`.
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' _f _g := sum_add_index' (h := fun _ n => n • _)
(fun _ ↦ zero_nsmul _) (fun _ ↦ add_nsmul _)
map_zero' := sum_zero_index
theorem toMultiset_zero : toMultiset (0 : α →₀ ℕ) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem toMultiset_add (m n : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset (m + n) = toMultiset m + toMultiset n :=
toMultiset.map_add m n
theorem toMultiset_apply (f : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset f = f.sum fun a n => n • {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_single (a : α) (n : ℕ) : toMultiset (single a n) = n • {a} := by
rw [toMultiset_apply, sum_single_index]; apply zero_nsmul
theorem toMultiset_sum {f : ι → α →₀ ℕ} (s : Finset ι) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, Finsupp.toMultiset (f i) :=
map_sum Finsupp.toMultiset _ _
theorem toMultiset_sum_single (s : Finset ι) (n : ℕ) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, single i n) = n • s.val := by
simp_rw [toMultiset_sum, Finsupp.toMultiset_single, Finset.sum_nsmul, sum_multiset_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (f : α →₀ ℕ) : Multiset.card (toMultiset f) = f.sum fun _ => id := by
simp [toMultiset_apply, map_finsuppSum, Function.id_def]
theorem toMultiset_map (f : α →₀ ℕ) (g : α → β) :
f.toMultiset.map g = toMultiset (f.mapDomain g) := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.map_zero, mapDomain_zero, toMultiset_zero]
· intro a n f _ _ ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.map_add, ih, mapDomain_add, mapDomain_single,
toMultiset_single, toMultiset_add, toMultiset_single, ← Multiset.coe_mapAddMonoidHom,
(Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom g).map_nsmul]
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_toMultiset [CommMonoid α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) :
f.toMultiset.prod = f.prod fun a n => a ^ n := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, Finsupp.prod_zero_index]
· intro a n f _ _ ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.prod_add, ih, toMultiset_single, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Finsupp.prod_add_index' pow_zero pow_add, Finsupp.prod_single_index, Multiset.prod_singleton]
exact pow_zero a
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) : f.toMultiset.toFinset = f.support := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero, support_zero]
· intro a n f ha hn ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.toFinset_add, ih, toMultiset_single, support_add_eq,
support_single_ne_zero _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton]
refine Disjoint.mono_left support_single_subset ?_
rwa [Finset.disjoint_singleton_left]
@[simp]
theorem count_toMultiset [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) (a : α) : (toMultiset f).count a = f a :=
calc
(toMultiset f).count a = Finsupp.sum f (fun x n => (n • {x} : Multiset α).count a) := by
rw [toMultiset_apply]; exact map_sum (Multiset.countAddMonoidHom a) _ f.support
_ = f.sum fun x n => n * ({x} : Multiset α).count a := by simp only [Multiset.count_nsmul]
_ = f a * ({a} : Multiset α).count a :=
sum_eq_single _
(fun a' _ H => by simp only [Multiset.count_singleton, if_false, H.symm, mul_zero])
(fun _ => zero_mul _)
_ = f a := by rw [Multiset.count_singleton_self, mul_one]
theorem toMultiset_sup [DecidableEq α] (f g : α →₀ ℕ) :
toMultiset (f ⊔ g) = toMultiset f ∪ toMultiset g := by
ext
simp_rw [Multiset.count_union, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.sup_apply]
theorem toMultiset_inf [DecidableEq α] (f g : α →₀ ℕ) :
toMultiset (f ⊓ g) = toMultiset f ∩ toMultiset g := by
ext
simp_rw [Multiset.count_inter, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.inf_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mem_toMultiset (f : α →₀ ℕ) (i : α) : i ∈ toMultiset f ↔ i ∈ f.support := by
classical
rw [← Multiset.count_ne_zero, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
end Finsupp
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Given a multiset `s`, `s.toFinsupp` returns the finitely supported function on `ℕ` given by
the multiplicities of the elements of `s`. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def toFinsupp : Multiset α ≃+ (α →₀ ℕ) where
toFun s := ⟨s.toFinset, fun a => s.count a, fun a => by simp⟩
invFun f := Finsupp.toMultiset f
map_add' _ _ := Finsupp.ext fun _ => count_add _ _ _
right_inv f :=
Finsupp.ext fun a => by
simp only [Finsupp.toMultiset_apply, Finsupp.sum, Multiset.count_sum',
Multiset.count_singleton, mul_boole, Finsupp.coe_mk, Finsupp.mem_support_iff,
Multiset.count_nsmul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, ite_not, ite_eq_right_iff]
exact Eq.symm
left_inv s := by simp only [Finsupp.toMultiset_apply, Finsupp.sum, Finsupp.coe_mk,
Multiset.toFinset_sum_count_nsmul_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_support (s : Multiset α) : s.toFinsupp.support = s.toFinset := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_apply (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : toFinsupp s a = s.count a := rfl
theorem toFinsupp_zero : toFinsupp (0 : Multiset α) = 0 := _root_.map_zero _
theorem toFinsupp_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinsupp (s + t) = toFinsupp s + toFinsupp t :=
_root_.map_add toFinsupp s t
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_singleton (a : α) : toFinsupp ({a} : Multiset α) = Finsupp.single a 1 := by
ext; rw [toFinsupp_apply, count_singleton, Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_toMultiset (s : Multiset α) : Finsupp.toMultiset (toFinsupp s) = s :=
Multiset.toFinsupp.symm_apply_apply s
theorem toFinsupp_eq_iff {s : Multiset α} {f : α →₀ ℕ} :
toFinsupp s = f ↔ s = Finsupp.toMultiset f :=
Multiset.toFinsupp.apply_eq_iff_symm_apply
theorem toFinsupp_union (s t : Multiset α) : toFinsupp (s ∪ t) = toFinsupp s ⊔ toFinsupp t := by
ext
simp
theorem toFinsupp_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinsupp (s ∩ t) = toFinsupp s ⊓ toFinsupp t := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sum_eq (s : Multiset α) : s.toFinsupp.sum (fun _ ↦ id) = Multiset.card s := by
rw [← Finsupp.card_toMultiset, toFinsupp_toMultiset]
end Multiset
@[simp]
theorem Finsupp.toMultiset_toFinsupp [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) :
Multiset.toFinsupp (Finsupp.toMultiset f) = f :=
Multiset.toFinsupp.apply_symm_apply _
theorem Finsupp.toMultiset_eq_iff [DecidableEq α] {f : α →₀ ℕ} {s : Multiset α} :
Finsupp.toMultiset f = s ↔ f = Multiset.toFinsupp s :=
Multiset.toFinsupp.symm_apply_eq
/-! ### As an order isomorphism -/
namespace Finsupp
/-- `Finsupp.toMultiset` as an order isomorphism. -/
def orderIsoMultiset [DecidableEq ι] : (ι →₀ ℕ) ≃o Multiset ι where
toEquiv := Multiset.toFinsupp.symm.toEquiv
map_rel_iff' {f g} := by simp [le_def, Multiset.le_iff_count]
@[simp]
theorem coe_orderIsoMultiset [DecidableEq ι] : ⇑(@orderIsoMultiset ι _) = toMultiset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_orderIsoMultiset_symm [DecidableEq ι] :
⇑(@orderIsoMultiset ι).symm = Multiset.toFinsupp :=
rfl
theorem toMultiset_strictMono : StrictMono (@toMultiset ι) := by
classical exact (@orderIsoMultiset ι _).strictMono
theorem sum_id_lt_of_lt (m n : ι →₀ ℕ) (h : m < n) : (m.sum fun _ => id) < n.sum fun _ => id := by
rw [← card_toMultiset, ← card_toMultiset]
apply Multiset.card_lt_card
exact toMultiset_strictMono h
variable (ι)
/-- The order on `ι →₀ ℕ` is well-founded. -/
theorem lt_wf : WellFounded (@LT.lt (ι →₀ ℕ) _) :=
Subrelation.wf (sum_id_lt_of_lt _ _) <| InvImage.wf _ Nat.lt_wfRel.2
-- TODO: generalize to `[WellFoundedRelation α] → WellFoundedRelation (ι →₀ α)`
instance : WellFoundedRelation (ι →₀ ℕ) where
rel := (· < ·)
wf := lt_wf _
end Finsupp
theorem Multiset.toFinsupp_strictMono [DecidableEq ι] : StrictMono (@Multiset.toFinsupp ι _) :=
(@Finsupp.orderIsoMultiset ι).symm.strictMono
namespace Sym
variable (α)
variable [DecidableEq α] (n : ℕ)
/-- The `n`th symmetric power of a type `α` is naturally equivalent to the subtype of
finitely-supported maps `α →₀ ℕ` with total mass `n`.
See also `Sym.equivNatSumOfFintype` when `α` is finite. -/
def equivNatSum :
Sym α n ≃ {P : α →₀ ℕ // P.sum (fun _ ↦ id) = n} :=
Multiset.toFinsupp.toEquiv.subtypeEquiv <| by simp
@[simp] lemma coe_equivNatSum_apply_apply (s : Sym α n) (a : α) :
(equivNatSum α n s : α →₀ ℕ) a = (s : Multiset α).count a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_equivNatSum_symm_apply (P : {P : α →₀ ℕ // P.sum (fun _ ↦ id) = n}) :
((equivNatSum α n).symm P : Multiset α) = Finsupp.toMultiset P :=
rfl
/-- The `n`th symmetric power of a finite type `α` is naturally equivalent to the subtype of maps
`α → ℕ` with total mass `n`.
See also `Sym.equivNatSum` when `α` is not necessarily finite. -/
noncomputable def equivNatSumOfFintype [Fintype α] :
Sym α n ≃ {P : α → ℕ // ∑ i, P i = n} :=
(equivNatSum α n).trans <| Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.subtypeEquiv <| by simp [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
@[simp] lemma coe_equivNatSumOfFintype_apply_apply [Fintype α] (s : Sym α n) (a : α) :
(equivNatSumOfFintype α n s : α → ℕ) a = (s : Multiset α).count a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_equivNatSumOfFintype_symm_apply [Fintype α] (P : {P : α → ℕ // ∑ i, P i = n}) :
((equivNatSumOfFintype α n).symm P : Multiset α) = ∑ a, ((P : α → ℕ) a) • {a} := by
obtain ⟨P, hP⟩ := P
change Finsupp.toMultiset (Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.symm P) = Multiset.sum _
ext a
rw [Multiset.count_sum]
simp [Multiset.count_singleton]
end Sym
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Multiset.lean | 291 | 297 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Convergence of L-series
We define `LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv f` (as an `EReal`) to be the infimum
of all real numbers `x` such that the L-series of `f` converges for complex arguments with
real part `x` and provide some results about it.
## Tags
L-series, abscissa of convergence
-/
open Complex
/-- The abscissa `x : EReal` of absolute convergence of the L-series associated to `f`:
the series converges absolutely at `s` when `re s > x` and does not converge absolutely
when `re s < x`. -/
noncomputable def LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv (f : ℕ → ℂ) : EReal :=
sInf <| Real.toEReal '' {x : ℝ | LSeriesSummable f x}
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_congr {f g : ℕ → ℂ} (h : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → f n = g n) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f = abscissaOfAbsConv g :=
congr_arg sInf <| congr_arg _ <| Set.ext fun x ↦ LSeriesSummable_congr x h
open Filter in
/-- If `f` and `g` agree on large `n : ℕ`, then their `LSeries` have the same
abscissa of absolute convergence. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_congr' {f g : ℕ → ℂ} (h : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f = abscissaOfAbsConv g :=
congr_arg sInf <| congr_arg _ <| Set.ext fun x ↦ LSeriesSummable_congr' x h
open LSeries
lemma LSeriesSummable_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hs : abscissaOfAbsConv f < s.re) : LSeriesSummable f s := by
obtain ⟨y, hy, hys⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ, LSeriesSummable f a ∧ a < s.re := by
simpa [abscissaOfAbsConv, sInf_lt_iff] using hs
exact hy.of_re_le_re <| ofReal_re y ▸ hys.le
lemma LSeriesSummable_lt_re_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hs : abscissaOfAbsConv f < s.re) :
∃ x : ℝ, x < s.re ∧ LSeriesSummable f x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := EReal.exists_between_coe_real hs
exact ⟨x, by simpa using hx₂, LSeriesSummable_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re hx₁⟩
lemma LSeriesSummable.abscissaOfAbsConv_le {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (h : LSeriesSummable f s) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ s.re :=
sInf_le <| by simpa using h.of_re_le_re (by simp)
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : ℝ}
(h : ∀ y : ℝ, x < y → LSeriesSummable f y) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x := by
| refine sInf_le_iff.mpr fun y hy ↦ le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a ↦ ?_
replace hy : ∀ (a : ℝ), LSeriesSummable f a → y ≤ a := by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hy
cases a with
| coe a₀ => exact_mod_cast fun ha ↦ hy a₀ (h a₀ ha)
| bot => simp
| top => simp
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable' {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : EReal}
(h : ∀ y : ℝ, x < y → LSeriesSummable f y) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x := by
cases x with
| coe => exact abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable <| mod_cast h
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Convergence.lean | 61 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Content
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Compact
/-!
# Haar measure
In this file we prove the existence of Haar measure for a locally compact Hausdorff topological
group.
We follow the write-up by Jonathan Gleason, *Existence and Uniqueness of Haar Measure*.
This is essentially the same argument as in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_measure#A_construction_using_compact_subsets.
We construct the Haar measure first on compact sets. For this we define `(K : U)` as the (smallest)
number of left-translates of `U` that are needed to cover `K` (`index` in the formalization).
Then we define a function `h` on compact sets as `lim_U (K : U) / (K₀ : U)`,
where `U` becomes a smaller and smaller open neighborhood of `1`, and `K₀` is a fixed compact set
with nonempty interior. This function is `chaar` in the formalization, and we define the limit
formally using Tychonoff's theorem.
This function `h` forms a content, which we can extend to an outer measure and then a measure
(`haarMeasure`).
We normalize the Haar measure so that the measure of `K₀` is `1`.
Note that `μ` need not coincide with `h` on compact sets, according to
[halmos1950measure, ch. X, §53 p.233]. However, we know that `h(K)` lies between `μ(Kᵒ)` and `μ(K)`,
where `ᵒ` denotes the interior.
We also give a form of uniqueness of Haar measure, for σ-finite measures on second-countable
locally compact groups. For more involved statements not assuming second-countability, see
the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
## Main Declarations
* `haarMeasure`: the Haar measure on a locally compact Hausdorff group. This is a left invariant
regular measure. It takes as argument a compact set of the group (with non-empty interior),
and is normalized so that the measure of the given set is 1.
* `haarMeasure_self`: the Haar measure is normalized.
* `isMulLeftInvariant_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure is left invariant.
* `regular_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure is a regular measure.
* `isHaarMeasure_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure satisfies the `IsHaarMeasure` typeclass, i.e.,
it is invariant and gives finite mass to compact sets and positive mass to nonempty open sets.
* `haar` : some choice of a Haar measure, on a locally compact Hausdorff group, constructed as
`haarMeasure K` where `K` is some arbitrary choice of a compact set with nonempty interior.
* `haarMeasure_unique`: Every σ-finite left invariant measure on a second-countable locally compact
Hausdorff group is a scalar multiple of the Haar measure.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* Jonathan Gleason, Existence and Uniqueness of Haar Measure
- Note: step 9, page 8 contains a mistake: the last defined `μ` does not extend the `μ` on compact
sets, see Halmos (1950) p. 233, bottom of the page. This makes some other steps (like step 11)
invalid.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Inv Function TopologicalSpace MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
/-! We put the internal functions in the construction of the Haar measure in a namespace,
so that the chosen names don't clash with other declarations.
We first define a couple of the functions before proving the properties (that require that `G`
is a topological group). -/
namespace haar
/-- The index or Haar covering number or ratio of `K` w.r.t. `V`, denoted `(K : V)`:
it is the smallest number of (left) translates of `V` that is necessary to cover `K`.
It is defined to be 0 if no finite number of translates cover `K`. -/
@[to_additive addIndex "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index`"]
noncomputable def index (K V : Set G) : ℕ :=
sInf <| Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V }
@[to_additive addIndex_empty]
theorem index_empty {V : Set G} : index ∅ V = 0 := by simp [index]
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
/-- `prehaar K₀ U K` is a weighted version of the index, defined as `(K : U)/(K₀ : U)`.
In the applications `K₀` is compact with non-empty interior, `U` is open containing `1`,
and `K` is any compact set.
The argument `K` is a (bundled) compact set, so that we can consider `prehaar K₀ U` as an
element of `haarProduct` (below). -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar`"]
noncomputable def prehaar (K₀ U : Set G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
(index (K : Set G) U : ℝ) / index K₀ U
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⊥ = 0 := by
rw [prehaar, Compacts.coe_bot, index_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G) :
0 ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by apply div_nonneg <;> norm_cast <;> apply zero_le
/-- `haarProduct K₀` is the product of intervals `[0, (K : K₀)]`, for all compact sets `K`.
For all `U`, we can show that `prehaar K₀ U ∈ haarProduct K₀`. -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct`"]
def haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
pi univ fun K => Icc 0 <| index (K : Set G) K₀
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_prehaar_empty {K₀ : Set G} {f : Compacts G → ℝ} :
f ∈ haarProduct K₀ ↔ ∀ K : Compacts G, f K ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) (index (K : Set G) K₀) := by
simp only [haarProduct, Set.pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_setOf_eq]
/-- The closure of the collection of elements of the form `prehaar K₀ U`,
for `U` open neighbourhoods of `1`, contained in `V`. The closure is taken in the space
`compacts G → ℝ`, with the topology of pointwise convergence.
We show that the intersection of all these sets is nonempty, and the Haar measure
on compact sets is defined to be an element in the closure of this intersection. -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar`"]
def clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
closure <| prehaar K₀ '' { U : Set G | U ⊆ V.1 ∧ IsOpen U ∧ (1 : G) ∈ U }
variable [IsTopologicalGroup G]
/-!
### Lemmas about `index`
-/
/-- If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined,
there is a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties. -/
@[to_additive addIndex_defined
"If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined, there is
a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties."]
theorem index_defined {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ n : ℕ, n ∈ Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V } := by
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK hV with ⟨t, ht⟩; exact ⟨t.card, t, ht, rfl⟩
@[to_additive addIndex_elim]
theorem index_elim {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Finset G, (K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) ∧ Finset.card t = index K V := by
have := Nat.sInf_mem (index_defined hK hV); rwa [mem_image] at this
@[to_additive le_addIndex_mul]
theorem le_index_mul (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K : Set G) V ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ * index (K₀ : Set G) V := by
classical
obtain ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩ := index_elim K.isCompact K₀.interior_nonempty
obtain ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩ := index_elim K₀.isCompact hV
rw [← h2s, ← h2t, mul_comm]
refine le_trans ?_ Finset.card_mul_le
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans h1s ?_
apply iUnion₂_subset; intro g₁ hg₁; rw [preimage_subset_iff]; intro g₂ hg₂
have := h1t hg₂
rcases this with ⟨_, ⟨g₃, rfl⟩, A, ⟨hg₃, rfl⟩, h2V⟩; rw [mem_preimage, ← mul_assoc] at h2V
exact mem_biUnion (Finset.mul_mem_mul hg₃ hg₁) h2V
@[to_additive addIndex_pos]
theorem index_pos (K : PositiveCompacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
0 < index (K : Set G) V := by
classical
rw [index, Nat.sInf_def, Nat.find_pos, mem_image]
· rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩; rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at h2t; subst h2t
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := K.interior_nonempty
show g ∈ (∅ : Set G)
convert h1t (interior_subset hg); symm
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty]
· exact index_defined K.isCompact hV
@[to_additive addIndex_mono]
theorem index_mono {K K' V : Set G} (hK' : IsCompact K') (h : K ⊆ K') (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index K V ≤ index K' V := by
rcases index_elim hK' hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]; exact ⟨s, Subset.trans h h1s, h2s⟩
@[to_additive addIndex_union_le]
theorem index_union_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V ≤ index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
classical
rcases index_elim K₁.2 hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
rcases index_elim K₂.2 hV with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← h2s, ← h2t]
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.card_union_le _ _)
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
apply union_subset <;> refine Subset.trans (by assumption) ?_ <;>
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left <;> intro g hg <;> simp only [mem_def] at hg <;>
simp only [mem_def, Multiset.mem_union, Finset.union_val, hg, or_true, true_or]
@[to_additive addIndex_union_eq]
theorem index_union_eq (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * V⁻¹) (K₂.1 * V⁻¹)) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V = index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
classical
apply le_antisymm (index_union_le K₁ K₂ hV)
rcases index_elim (K₁.2.union K₂.2) hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
have (K : Set G) (hK : K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ s, (g * ·) ⁻¹' V) :
index K V ≤ {g ∈ s | ((g * ·) ⁻¹' V ∩ K).Nonempty}.card := by
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
intro g hg; rcases hK hg with ⟨_, ⟨g₀, rfl⟩, _, ⟨h1g₀, rfl⟩, h2g₀⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h2g₀
simp only [mem_iUnion]; use g₀; constructor; swap
· simp only [Finset.mem_filter, h1g₀, true_and]; use g
simp [hg, h2g₀]
exact h2g₀
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (this K₁.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_left h1s)
(this K₂.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_right h1s)) ?_
rw [← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint, Finset.filter_union_right]
· exact s.card_filter_le _
apply Finset.disjoint_filter.mpr
rintro g₁ _ ⟨g₂, h1g₂, h2g₂⟩ ⟨g₃, h1g₃, h2g₃⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h1g₃ h1g₂
refine h.le_bot (?_ : g₁⁻¹ ∈ _)
constructor <;> simp only [Set.mem_inv, Set.mem_mul, exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₂, (g₁ * g₂)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₂]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₃, (g₁ * g₃)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₃]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive add_left_addIndex_le]
theorem mul_left_index_le {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(g : G) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V ≤ index K V := by
rcases index_elim hK hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]
refine ⟨s.map (Equiv.mulRight g⁻¹).toEmbedding, ?_, Finset.card_map _⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans (image_subset _ h1s) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g₁, ⟨_, ⟨g₂, rfl⟩, ⟨_, ⟨hg₂, rfl⟩, hg₁⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at hg₁
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Finset.mem_map, Equiv.coe_mulRight,
exists_exists_and_eq_and, mem_preimage, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply]
refine ⟨_, hg₂, ?_⟩; simp only [mul_assoc, hg₁, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[to_additive is_left_invariant_addIndex]
theorem is_left_invariant_index {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (g : G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V = index K V := by
refine le_antisymm (mul_left_index_le hK hV g) ?_
convert mul_left_index_le (hK.image <| continuous_mul_left g) hV g⁻¹
rw [image_image]; symm; convert image_id' _ with h; apply inv_mul_cancel_left
/-!
### Lemmas about `prehaar`
-/
@[to_additive add_prehaar_le_addIndex]
theorem prehaar_le_index (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ := by
unfold prehaar; rw [div_le_iff₀] <;> norm_cast
· apply le_index_mul K₀ K hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_pos (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) {K : Set G}
(h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : (interior K).Nonempty) : 0 < prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⟨K, h1K⟩ := by
apply div_pos <;> norm_cast
· apply index_pos ⟨⟨K, h1K⟩, h2K⟩ hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_mono {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty)
{K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂.1) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right]
· exact mod_cast index_mono K₂.2 h hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₀.toCompacts = 1 :=
div_self <| ne_of_gt <| mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_sup_le {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ + prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_add_div_same, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right]
· exact mod_cast index_union_le K₁ K₂ hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_sup_eq {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} {K₁ K₂ : Compacts G}
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) (h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * U⁻¹) (K₂.1 * U⁻¹)) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ + prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_add_div_same]
-- Porting note: Here was `congr`, but `to_additive` failed to generate a theorem.
refine congr_arg (fun x : ℝ => x / index K₀ U) ?_
exact mod_cast index_union_eq K₁ K₂ hU h
@[to_additive]
theorem is_left_invariant_prehaar {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty)
(g : G) (K : Compacts G) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by
simp only [prehaar, Compacts.coe_map, is_left_invariant_index K.isCompact _ hU]
/-!
### Lemmas about `haarProduct`
-/
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_mem_haarProduct (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ∈ haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) := by
rintro ⟨K, hK⟩ _; rw [mem_Icc]; exact ⟨prehaar_nonneg K₀ _, prehaar_le_index K₀ _ hU⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
(haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) ∩ ⋂ V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G), clPrehaar K₀ V).Nonempty := by
have : IsCompact (haarProduct (K₀ : Set G)) := by
apply isCompact_univ_pi; intro K; apply isCompact_Icc
refine this.inter_iInter_nonempty (clPrehaar K₀) (fun s => isClosed_closure) fun t => ?_
let V₀ := ⋂ V ∈ t, (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)).carrier
have h1V₀ : IsOpen V₀ := isOpen_biInter_finset <| by rintro ⟨⟨V, hV₁⟩, hV₂⟩ _; exact hV₁
have h2V₀ : (1 : G) ∈ V₀ := by simp only [V₀, mem_iInter]; rintro ⟨⟨V, hV₁⟩, hV₂⟩ _; exact hV₂
refine ⟨prehaar K₀ V₀, ?_⟩
constructor
· apply prehaar_mem_haarProduct K₀; use 1; rwa [h1V₀.interior_eq]
· simp only [mem_iInter]; rintro ⟨V, hV⟩ h2V; apply subset_closure
apply mem_image_of_mem; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
exact ⟨Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ ⟨V, hV⟩) (iInter_subset _ h2V), h1V₀, h2V₀⟩
/-!
### Lemmas about `chaar`
-/
/-- This is the "limit" of `prehaar K₀ U K` as `U` becomes a smaller and smaller open
neighborhood of `(1 : G)`. More precisely, it is defined to be an arbitrary element
in the intersection of all the sets `clPrehaar K₀ V` in `haarProduct K₀`.
This is roughly equal to the Haar measure on compact sets,
but it can differ slightly. We do know that
`haarMeasure K₀ (interior K) ≤ chaar K₀ K ≤ haarMeasure K₀ K`. -/
@[to_additive addCHaar "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar`"]
noncomputable def chaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
Classical.choose (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀) K
@[to_additive addCHaar_mem_addHaarProduct]
theorem chaar_mem_haarProduct (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ ∈ haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) :=
(Classical.choose_spec (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀)).1
@[to_additive addCHaar_mem_clAddPrehaar]
theorem chaar_mem_clPrehaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) :
chaar K₀ ∈ clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) V := by
have := (Classical.choose_spec (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀)).2; rw [mem_iInter] at this
exact this V
@[to_additive addCHaar_nonneg]
theorem chaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) : 0 ≤ chaar K₀ K := by
have := chaar_mem_haarProduct K₀ K (mem_univ _); rw [mem_Icc] at this; exact this.1
@[to_additive addCHaar_empty]
theorem chaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ ⊥ = 0 := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f ⊥
have : Continuous eval := continuous_apply ⊥
show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, _, rfl⟩; apply prehaar_empty
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
@[to_additive addCHaar_self]
theorem chaar_self (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ K₀.toCompacts = 1 := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₀.toCompacts
have : Continuous eval := continuous_apply _
show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(1 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; apply prehaar_self
rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
@[to_additive addCHaar_mono]
theorem chaar_mono {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) :
chaar K₀ K₁ ≤ chaar K₀ K₂ := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₂ - f K₁
have : Continuous eval := (continuous_apply K₂).sub (continuous_apply K₁)
rw [← sub_nonneg]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' Ici (0 : ℝ)
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; simp only [eval, mem_preimage, mem_Ici, sub_nonneg]
apply prehaar_mono _ h; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_Ici
@[to_additive addCHaar_sup_le]
theorem chaar_sup_le {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) :
chaar K₀ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ chaar K₀ K₁ + chaar K₀ K₂ := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₁ + f K₂ - f (K₁ ⊔ K₂)
have : Continuous eval := by
exact ((continuous_apply K₁).add (continuous_apply K₂)).sub (continuous_apply (K₁ ⊔ K₂))
rw [← sub_nonneg]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' Ici (0 : ℝ)
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; simp only [eval, mem_preimage, mem_Ici, sub_nonneg]
apply prehaar_sup_le; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_Ici
@[to_additive addCHaar_sup_eq]
theorem chaar_sup_eq {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G}
{K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : Disjoint K₁.1 K₂.1) (h₂ : IsClosed K₂.1) :
chaar K₀ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = chaar K₀ K₁ + chaar K₀ K₂ := by
rcases SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed K₁.2 K₂.2 h₂ h
with ⟨U₁, U₂, h1U₁, h1U₂, h2U₁, h2U₂, hU⟩
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right K₁.2 h1U₁ h2U₁ with ⟨L₁, h1L₁, h2L₁⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp h1L₁ with ⟨V₁, h1V₁, h2V₁, h3V₁⟩
replace h2L₁ := Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul_left h1V₁) h2L₁
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right K₂.2 h1U₂ h2U₂ with ⟨L₂, h1L₂, h2L₂⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp h1L₂ with ⟨V₂, h1V₂, h2V₂, h3V₂⟩
replace h2L₂ := Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul_left h1V₂) h2L₂
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₁ + f K₂ - f (K₁ ⊔ K₂)
have : Continuous eval :=
((continuous_apply K₁).add (continuous_apply K₂)).sub (continuous_apply (K₁ ⊔ K₂))
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
let V := V₁ ∩ V₂
apply
mem_of_subset_of_mem _
(chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀
⟨⟨V⁻¹, (h2V₁.inter h2V₂).preimage continuous_inv⟩, by
simp only [V, mem_inv, inv_one, h3V₁, h3V₂, mem_inter_iff, true_and]⟩)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨h1U, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [eval, mem_preimage, sub_eq_zero, mem_singleton_iff]; rw [eq_comm]
apply prehaar_sup_eq
· rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· refine disjoint_of_subset ?_ ?_ hU
· refine Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul Subset.rfl ?_) h2L₁
exact Subset.trans (inv_subset.mpr h1U) inter_subset_left
· refine Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul Subset.rfl ?_) h2L₂
exact Subset.trans (inv_subset.mpr h1U) inter_subset_right
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
@[to_additive is_left_invariant_addCHaar]
theorem is_left_invariant_chaar {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} (g : G) (K : Compacts G) :
chaar K₀ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = chaar K₀ K := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) - f K
have : Continuous eval := (continuous_apply (K.map _ _)).sub (continuous_apply K)
rw [← sub_eq_zero]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [eval, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, sub_eq_zero]
apply is_left_invariant_prehaar; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
/-- The function `chaar` interpreted in `ℝ≥0`, as a content -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarContent`"]
noncomputable def haarContent (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : Content G where
toFun K := ⟨chaar K₀ K, chaar_nonneg _ _⟩
mono' K₁ K₂ h := by simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.toReal, chaar_mono, h]
sup_disjoint' K₁ K₂ h _h₁ h₂ := by simp only [chaar_sup_eq h]; rfl
sup_le' K₁ K₂ := by
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add]
simp only [NNReal.toReal, chaar_sup_le]
/-! We only prove the properties for `haarContent` that we use at least twice below. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem haarContent_apply (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) :
haarContent K₀ K = show NNReal from ⟨chaar K₀ K, chaar_nonneg _ _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The variant of `chaar_self` for `haarContent` -/
@[to_additive "The variant of `addCHaar_self` for `addHaarContent`."]
theorem haarContent_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} : haarContent K₀ K₀.toCompacts = 1 := by
simp_rw [← ENNReal.coe_one, haarContent_apply, ENNReal.coe_inj, chaar_self]; rfl
/-- The variant of `is_left_invariant_chaar` for `haarContent` -/
@[to_additive "The variant of `is_left_invariant_addCHaar` for `addHaarContent`"]
theorem is_left_invariant_haarContent {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} (g : G) (K : Compacts G) :
haarContent K₀ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = haarContent K₀ K := by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_inj, ← NNReal.coe_inj, haarContent_apply] using
is_left_invariant_chaar g K
@[to_additive]
theorem haarContent_outerMeasure_self_pos (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
0 < (haarContent K₀).outerMeasure K₀ := by
refine zero_lt_one.trans_le ?_
rw [Content.outerMeasure_eq_iInf]
refine le_iInf₂ fun U hU => le_iInf fun hK₀ => le_trans ?_ <| le_iSup₂ K₀.toCompacts hK₀
exact haarContent_self.ge
@[to_additive]
theorem haarContent_outerMeasure_closure_pos (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
0 < (haarContent K₀).outerMeasure (closure K₀) :=
(haarContent_outerMeasure_self_pos K₀).trans_le (OuterMeasure.mono _ subset_closure)
end haar
open haar
/-!
### The Haar measure
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
/-- The Haar measure on the locally compact group `G`, scaled so that `haarMeasure K₀ K₀ = 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"The Haar measure on the locally compact additive group `G`, scaled so that
`addHaarMeasure K₀ K₀ = 1`."]
noncomputable def haarMeasure (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : Measure G :=
((haarContent K₀).measure K₀)⁻¹ • (haarContent K₀).measure
@[to_additive]
theorem haarMeasure_apply {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {s : Set G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
haarMeasure K₀ s = (haarContent K₀).outerMeasure s / (haarContent K₀).measure K₀ := by
change ((haarContent K₀).measure K₀)⁻¹ * (haarContent K₀).measure s = _
simp only [hs, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, Content.measure_apply]
@[to_additive]
instance isMulLeftInvariant_haarMeasure (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
IsMulLeftInvariant (haarMeasure K₀) := by
rw [← forall_measure_preimage_mul_iff]
intro g A hA
rw [haarMeasure_apply hA, haarMeasure_apply (measurable_const_mul g hA)]
-- Porting note: Here was `congr 1`, but `to_additive` failed to generate a theorem.
refine congr_arg (fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / (haarContent K₀).measure K₀) ?_
apply Content.is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure
apply is_left_invariant_haarContent
@[to_additive]
theorem haarMeasure_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} : haarMeasure K₀ K₀ = 1 := by
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace G := K₀.locallyCompactSpace_of_group
simp only [haarMeasure, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← K₀.isCompact.measure_closure,
Content.measure_apply _ isClosed_closure.measurableSet, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel]
· exact (haarContent_outerMeasure_closure_pos K₀).ne'
· exact (Content.outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact _ K₀.isCompact.closure).ne
/-- The Haar measure is regular. -/
@[to_additive "The additive Haar measure is regular."]
instance regular_haarMeasure {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} : (haarMeasure K₀).Regular := by
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace G := K₀.locallyCompactSpace_of_group
apply Regular.smul
rw [← K₀.isCompact.measure_closure,
Content.measure_apply _ isClosed_closure.measurableSet, ENNReal.inv_ne_top]
exact (haarContent_outerMeasure_closure_pos K₀).ne'
@[to_additive]
theorem haarMeasure_closure_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} : haarMeasure K₀ (closure K₀) = 1 := by
rw [K₀.isCompact.measure_closure, haarMeasure_self]
/-- The Haar measure is sigma-finite in a second countable group. -/
@[to_additive "The additive Haar measure is sigma-finite in a second countable group."]
instance sigmaFinite_haarMeasure [SecondCountableTopology G] {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} :
SigmaFinite (haarMeasure K₀) := by
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace G := K₀.locallyCompactSpace_of_group; infer_instance
/-- The Haar measure is a Haar measure, i.e., it is invariant and gives finite mass to compact
sets and positive mass to nonempty open sets. -/
@[to_additive
"The additive Haar measure is an additive Haar measure, i.e., it is invariant and gives finite mass
to compact sets and positive mass to nonempty open sets."]
instance isHaarMeasure_haarMeasure (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : IsHaarMeasure (haarMeasure K₀) := by
apply
isHaarMeasure_of_isCompact_nonempty_interior (haarMeasure K₀) K₀ K₀.isCompact
K₀.interior_nonempty
· simp only [haarMeasure_self]; exact one_ne_zero
· simp only [haarMeasure_self, ne_eq, ENNReal.one_ne_top, not_false_eq_true]
/-- `haar` is some choice of a Haar measure, on a locally compact group. -/
@[to_additive
"`addHaar` is some choice of a Haar measure, on a locally compact additive group."]
noncomputable abbrev haar [LocallyCompactSpace G] : Measure G :=
haarMeasure <| Classical.arbitrary _
/-! Steinhaus theorem: if `E` has positive measure, then `E / E` contains a neighborhood of zero.
Note that this is not true for general regular Haar measures: in `ℝ × ℝ` where the first factor
has the discrete topology, then `E = ℝ × {0}` has infinite measure for the regular Haar measure,
but `E / E` does not contain a neighborhood of zero. On the other hand, it is always true for
inner regular Haar measures (and in particular for any Haar measure on a second countable group).
-/
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
private lemma steinhaus_mul_aux (μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ] [μ.InnerRegularCompactLTTop]
[LocallyCompactSpace G] (E : Set G) (hE : MeasurableSet E)
(hEapprox : ∃ K ⊆ E, IsCompact K ∧ 0 < μ K) : E / E ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
/- For any measure `μ` and set `E` containing a compact set `K` of positive measure, there exists
a neighborhood `V` of the identity such that `v • K \ K` has small measure for all `v ∈ V`, say
`< μ K`. Then `v • K` and `K` can not be disjoint, as otherwise `μ (v • K \ K) = μ (v • K) = μ K`.
This show that `K / K` contains the neighborhood `V` of `1`, and therefore that it is
itself such a neighborhood. -/
obtain ⟨K, hKE, hK, K_closed, hKpos⟩ : ∃ K ⊆ E, IsCompact K ∧ IsClosed K ∧ 0 < μ K := by
obtain ⟨K, hKE, hK_comp, hK_meas⟩ := hEapprox
exact ⟨closure K, hK_comp.closure_subset_measurableSet hE hKE, hK_comp.closure,
isClosed_closure, by rwa [hK_comp.measure_closure]⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_nhds_one_measure_smul_diff_lt hK K_closed hKpos.ne' (μ := μ)] with g hg
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, hxK, rfl⟩, hgxK⟩ : ∃ x ∈ g • K, x ∈ K :=
not_disjoint_iff.1 fun hd ↦ by simp [hd.symm.sdiff_eq_right, measure_smul] at hg
simpa using div_mem_div (hKE hgxK) (hKE hxK)
/-- **Steinhaus Theorem** for finite mass sets.
In any locally compact group `G` with an Haar measure `μ` that's inner regular on finite measure
sets, for any measurable set `E` of finite positive measure, the set `E / E` is a neighbourhood of
`1`. -/
@[to_additive
"**Steinhaus Theorem** for finite mass sets.
In any locally compact group `G` with an Haar measure `μ` that's inner regular on finite measure
sets, for any measurable set `E` of finite positive measure, the set `E - E` is a neighbourhood of
`0`. "]
theorem div_mem_nhds_one_of_haar_pos_ne_top (μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ]
[LocallyCompactSpace G] [μ.InnerRegularCompactLTTop] (E : Set G) (hE : MeasurableSet E)
(hEpos : 0 < μ E) (hEfin : μ E ≠ ∞) : E / E ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
steinhaus_mul_aux μ E hE <| hE.exists_lt_isCompact_of_ne_top hEfin hEpos
/-- **Steinhaus Theorem**.
In any locally compact group `G` with an inner regular Haar measure `μ`,
for any measurable set `E` of positive measure, the set `E / E` is a neighbourhood of `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"**Steinhaus Theorem**.
In any locally compact group `G` with an inner regular Haar measure `μ`,
for any measurable set `E` of positive measure, the set `E - E` is a neighbourhood of `0`."]
theorem div_mem_nhds_one_of_haar_pos (μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ] [LocallyCompactSpace G]
[InnerRegular μ] (E : Set G) (hE : MeasurableSet E) (hEpos : 0 < μ E) :
E / E ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := steinhaus_mul_aux μ E hE <| hE.exists_lt_isCompact hEpos
section SecondCountable_SigmaFinite
/-! In this section, we investigate uniqueness of left-invariant measures without assuming that
the measure is finite on compact sets, but assuming σ-finiteness instead. We also rely on
second-countability, to ensure that the group operations are measurable: in this case, one can
bypass all topological arguments, and conclude using uniqueness of σ-finite left-invariant measures
in measurable groups.
For more general uniqueness statements without second-countability assumptions,
see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
variable [SecondCountableTopology G]
/-- **Uniqueness of left-invariant measures**: In a second-countable locally compact group, any
σ-finite left-invariant measure is a scalar multiple of the Haar measure.
This is slightly weaker than assuming that `μ` is a Haar measure (in particular we don't require
`μ ≠ 0`).
See also `isMulLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_regular`
for a statement not assuming second-countability. -/
@[to_additive
"**Uniqueness of left-invariant measures**: In a second-countable locally compact additive group,
any σ-finite left-invariant measure is a scalar multiple of the additive Haar measure.
This is slightly weaker than assuming that `μ` is a additive Haar measure (in particular we don't
require `μ ≠ 0`).
See also `isAddLeftInvariant_eq_smul_of_regular`
for a statement not assuming second-countability."]
theorem haarMeasure_unique (μ : Measure G) [SigmaFinite μ] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
(K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : μ = μ K₀ • haarMeasure K₀ := by
have A : Set.Nonempty (interior (closure (K₀ : Set G))) :=
K₀.interior_nonempty.mono (interior_mono subset_closure)
have := measure_eq_div_smul μ (haarMeasure K₀)
(measure_pos_of_nonempty_interior _ A).ne' K₀.isCompact.closure.measure_ne_top
rwa [haarMeasure_closure_self, div_one, K₀.isCompact.measure_closure] at this
/-- Let `μ` be a σ-finite left invariant measure on `G`. Then `μ` is equal to the Haar measure
defined by `K₀` iff `μ K₀ = 1`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem haarMeasure_eq_iff (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (μ : Measure G) [SigmaFinite μ]
[IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
haarMeasure K₀ = μ ↔ μ K₀ = 1 :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ haarMeasure_self, fun h => by rw [haarMeasure_unique μ K₀, h, one_smul]⟩
example [LocallyCompactSpace G] (μ : Measure G) [IsHaarMeasure μ] (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
μ = μ K₀.1 • haarMeasure K₀ :=
haarMeasure_unique μ K₀
/-- To show that an invariant σ-finite measure is regular it is sufficient to show that it is finite
on some compact set with non-empty interior. -/
@[to_additive
"To show that an invariant σ-finite measure is regular it is sufficient to show that it is finite on
some compact set with non-empty interior."]
theorem regular_of_isMulLeftInvariant {μ : Measure G} [SigmaFinite μ] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
{K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (h2K : (interior K).Nonempty) (hμK : μ K ≠ ∞) : Regular μ := by
rw [haarMeasure_unique μ ⟨⟨K, hK⟩, h2K⟩]; exact Regular.smul hμK
end SecondCountable_SigmaFinite
end Group
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Basic.lean | 761 | 767 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SeparableDegree
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsSepClosed
/-!
# Separable closure
This file contains basics about the (relative) separable closure of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `separableClosure`: the relative separable closure of `F` in `E`, or called maximal separable
subextension of `E / F`, is defined to be the intermediate field of `E / F` consisting of all
separable elements.
- `SeparableClosure`: the absolute separable closure, defined to be the relative separable
closure inside the algebraic closure.
- `Field.sepDegree F E`: the (infinite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `separableClosure F E / F`. Later we will show
that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`, not in this file), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite, then this
coincides with `Field.finSepDegree F E`.
- `Field.insepDegree F E`: the (infinite) inseparable degree $[E:F]_i$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E`.
- `Field.finInsepDegree F E`: the finite inseparable degree $[E:F]_i$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E` as a natural number.
It is zero if such field extension is not finite.
## Main results
- `le_separableClosure_iff`: an intermediate field of `E / F` is contained in the
separable closure of `F` in `E` if and only if it is separable over `F`.
- `separableClosure.normalClosure_eq_self`: the normal closure of the separable
closure of `F` in `E` is equal to itself.
- `separableClosure.isGalois`: the separable closure in a normal extension is Galois
(namely, normal and separable).
- `separableClosure.isSepClosure`: the separable closure in a separably closed extension
is a separable closure of the base field.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_iff_isSeparable`: `F(S) / F` is a separable extension if and
only if all elements of `S` are separable elements.
- `separableClosure.eq_top_iff`: the separable closure of `F` in `E` is equal to `E`
if and only if `E / F` is separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, separable closure
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
section separableClosure
/-- The (relative) separable closure of `F` in `E`, or called maximal separable subextension
of `E / F`, is defined to be the intermediate field of `E / F` consisting of all separable
elements. The previous results prove that these elements are closed under field operations. -/
@[stacks 09HC]
def separableClosure : IntermediateField F E where
carrier := {x | IsSeparable F x}
mul_mem' := isSeparable_mul
add_mem' := isSeparable_add
algebraMap_mem' := isSeparable_algebraMap E
inv_mem' _ := isSeparable_inv
variable {F E K}
/-- An element is contained in the separable closure of `F` in `E` if and only if
it is a separable element. -/
theorem mem_separableClosure_iff {x : E} :
x ∈ separableClosure F E ↔ IsSeparable F x := Iff.rfl
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then `i x` is contained in
`separableClosure F K` if and only if `x` is contained in `separableClosure F E`. -/
theorem map_mem_separableClosure_iff (i : E →ₐ[F] K) {x : E} :
i x ∈ separableClosure F K ↔ x ∈ separableClosure F E := by
simp_rw [mem_separableClosure_iff, IsSeparable, minpoly.algHom_eq i i.injective]
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then the preimage of
`separableClosure F K` under the map `i` is equal to `separableClosure F E`. -/
theorem separableClosure.comap_eq_of_algHom (i : E →ₐ[F] K) :
(separableClosure F K).comap i = separableClosure F E := by
ext x
exact map_mem_separableClosure_iff i
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then the image of `separableClosure F E`
under the map `i` is contained in `separableClosure F K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.map_le_of_algHom (i : E →ₐ[F] K) :
(separableClosure F E).map i ≤ separableClosure F K :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (comap_eq_of_algHom i).ge
variable (F) in
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` has no non-trivial separable
subextensions (when `K / E` is algebraic, this means that it is purely inseparable),
then the image of `separableClosure F E` in `K` is equal to `separableClosure F K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.map_eq_of_separableClosure_eq_bot [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
| (h : separableClosure E K = ⊥) :
(separableClosure F E).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K) = separableClosure F K := by
refine le_antisymm (map_le_of_algHom _) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 <| h ▸ mem_separableClosure_iff.2
(IsSeparable.tower_top E <| mem_separableClosure_iff.1 hx)
exact ⟨y, (map_mem_separableClosure_iff <| IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K).mp hx, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableClosure.lean | 115 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Intervals as multisets
This file defines intervals as multisets.
## Main declarations
In a `LocallyFiniteOrder`,
* `Multiset.Icc`: Closed-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ico`: Closed-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioc`: Open-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioo`: Open-open interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderTop`,
* `Multiset.Ici`: Closed-infinite interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioi`: Open-infinite interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderBot`,
* `Multiset.Iic`: Infinite-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Iio`: Infinite-closed interval as a multiset.
## TODO
Do we really need this file at all? (March 2024)
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Icc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Icc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Icc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ico a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ico (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ico a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Ioc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ioo a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioo (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioo a b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Icc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Icc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ico, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ico]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Ioc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ioo, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioo]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x`. Basically `Set.Ici a` as a multiset. -/
def Ici (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ici a).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x`. Basically `Set.Ioi a` as a multiset. -/
def Ioi (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioi a).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x := by rw [Ici, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ici]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x := by rw [Ioi, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioi]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Iic b` as a multiset. -/
def Iic (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iic b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x < b`. Basically `Set.Iio b` as a multiset. -/
def Iio (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iio b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b := by rw [Iic, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iic]
@[simp] lemma mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b := by rw [Iio, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iio]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem nodup_Icc : (Icc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ico : (Ico a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioo : (Ioo a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_iff : Icc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Icc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_iff : Ico a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ico, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_iff : Ioc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioo, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_zero⟩ := Icc_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_zero⟩ := Ico_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_zero⟩ := Ioc_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _x hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = 0 :=
Icc_eq_zero h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = 0 :=
Ico_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = 0 :=
Ioc_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
Ioo_eq_zero h.not_lt
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = 0 := by rw [Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = 0 := by rw [Ioc, Finset.Ioc_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = 0 := by rw [Ioo, Finset.Ioo_self, Finset.empty_val]
variable {a}
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.left_mem_Icc
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.left_mem_Ico
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.right_mem_Icc
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.right_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left hca]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le hbc]
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a c := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right hcb]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left hca]
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => b ≤ x) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico c b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le hac]
rfl
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [Icc, Finset.Icc_self, Finset.singleton_val]
theorem Ico_cons_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ::ₘ Ico a b = Icc a b := by
classical
rw [Ico, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem right_not_mem_Ico, Finset.Ico_insert_right h]
rfl
theorem Ioo_cons_left (h : a < b) : a ::ₘ Ioo a b = Ico a b := by
classical
rw [Ioo, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem left_not_mem_Ioo, Finset.Ioo_insert_left h]
rfl
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico c d) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun hab hbc => by
rw [mem_Ico] at hab hbc
exact hab.2.not_le (h.trans hbc.1)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_of_le [DecidableEq α] {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = 0 :=
Multiset.inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint.2 <| Ico_disjoint_Ico h
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_left hab]
rfl
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ico a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioc a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Ico a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Icc a b) - 2 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two _ _
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h
theorem Ico_add_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b + Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.2 (Ico_disjoint_Ico le_rfl), Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.union_val,
Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.inter_val, Finset.Ico_inter_Ico]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right]
end LinearOrder
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 310 | 313 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Powerset
/-!
# The antidiagonal on a multiset.
The antidiagonal of a multiset `s` consists of all pairs `(t₁, t₂)`
such that `t₁ + t₂ = s`. These pairs are counted with multiplicities.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid Ring
universe u
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- The antidiagonal of a multiset `s` consists of all pairs `(t₁, t₂)`
such that `t₁ + t₂ = s`. These pairs are counted with multiplicities. -/
def antidiagonal (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α × Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l ↦ (revzip (powersetAux l) : Multiset (Multiset α × Multiset α)))
fun _ _ h ↦ Quot.sound (revzip_powersetAux_perm h)
theorem antidiagonal_coe (l : List α) : @antidiagonal α l = revzip (powersetAux l) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_coe' (l : List α) : @antidiagonal α l = revzip (powersetAux' l) :=
Quot.sound revzip_powersetAux_perm_aux'
/-- A pair `(t₁, t₂)` of multisets is contained in `antidiagonal s`
if and only if `t₁ + t₂ = s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_antidiagonal {s : Multiset α} {x : Multiset α × Multiset α} :
x ∈ antidiagonal s ↔ x.1 + x.2 = s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by
dsimp only [quot_mk_to_coe, antidiagonal_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => revzip_powersetAux h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
have _ := Classical.decEq α
simp only [revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, h.symm, mem_coe,
List.mem_map, mem_powersetAux]
obtain ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ := x
exact ⟨x₁, le_add_right _ _, by rw [add_tsub_cancel_left x₁ x₂]⟩
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_map_fst (s : Multiset α) : (antidiagonal s).map Prod.fst = powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by simp [powersetAux']
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_map_snd (s : Multiset α) : (antidiagonal s).map Prod.snd = powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by simp [powersetAux']
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_zero : @antidiagonal α 0 = {(0, 0)} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_cons (a : α) (s) :
antidiagonal (a ::ₘ s) =
map (Prod.map id (cons a)) (antidiagonal s) + map (Prod.map (cons a) id) (antidiagonal s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by
simp only [revzip, reverse_append, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_eq_coe, powersetAux'_cons, cons_coe,
map_coe, antidiagonal_coe', coe_add]
rw [← zip_map, ← zip_map, zip_append, (_ : _ ++ _ = _)]
· congr
· simp only [List.map_id]
· rw [map_reverse]
· simp
· simp
theorem antidiagonal_eq_map_powerset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.antidiagonal = s.powerset.map fun t ↦ (s - t, t) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a s hs
· simp only [antidiagonal_zero, powerset_zero, Multiset.zero_sub, map_singleton]
· simp_rw [antidiagonal_cons, powerset_cons, map_add, hs, map_map, Function.comp, Prod.map_apply,
id, sub_cons, erase_cons_head]
rw [add_comm]
congr 1
refine Multiset.map_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [cons_sub_of_le _ (mem_powerset.mp hx)]
@[simp]
theorem card_antidiagonal (s : Multiset α) : card (antidiagonal s) = 2 ^ card s := by
have := card_powerset s
rwa [← antidiagonal_map_fst, card_map] at this
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Antidiagonal.lean | 103 | 105 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Lists from functions
Theorems and lemmas for dealing with `List.ofFn`, which converts a function on `Fin n` to a list
of length `n`.
## Main Statements
The main statements pertain to lists generated using `List.ofFn`
- `List.get?_ofFn`, which tells us the nth element of such a list
- `List.equivSigmaTuple`, which is an `Equiv` between lists and the functions that generate them
via `List.ofFn`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat
namespace List
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f (Fin.cast (by simp) i) := by
simp; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get?_ofFn := List.getElem?_ofFn
@[simp]
theorem map_ofFn {β : Type*} {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) (g : α → β) :
map g (ofFn f) = ofFn (g ∘ f) :=
ext_get (by simp) fun i h h' => by simp
@[congr]
theorem ofFn_congr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) (f : Fin m → α) :
ofFn f = ofFn fun i : Fin n => f (Fin.cast h.symm i) := by
subst h
simp_rw [Fin.cast_refl, id]
theorem ofFn_succ' {n} (f : Fin (succ n) → α) :
ofFn f = (ofFn fun i => f (Fin.castSucc i)).concat (f (Fin.last _)) := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [ofFn_zero, concat_nil, ofFn_succ, ofFn_zero]
rfl
· rw [ofFn_succ, IH, ofFn_succ, concat_cons, Fin.castSucc_zero]
congr
/-- Note this matches the convention of `List.ofFn_succ'`, putting the `Fin m` elements first. -/
theorem ofFn_add {m n} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) :
List.ofFn f =
(List.ofFn fun i => f (Fin.castAdd n i)) ++ List.ofFn fun j => f (Fin.natAdd m j) := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [ofFn_zero, append_nil, Fin.castAdd_zero, Fin.cast_refl]
rfl
· rw [ofFn_succ', ofFn_succ', IH, append_concat]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_fin_append {m n} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) :
List.ofFn (Fin.append a b) = List.ofFn a ++ List.ofFn b := by
simp_rw [ofFn_add, Fin.append_left, Fin.append_right]
/-- This breaks a list of `m*n` items into `m` groups each containing `n` elements. -/
theorem ofFn_mul {m n} (f : Fin (m * n) → α) :
List.ofFn f = List.flatten (List.ofFn fun i : Fin m => List.ofFn fun j : Fin n => f ⟨i * n + j,
calc
↑i * n + j < (i + 1) * n :=
(Nat.add_lt_add_left j.prop _).trans_eq (by rw [Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul])
_ ≤ _ := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ i.prop⟩) := by
induction' m with m IH
· simp [ofFn_zero, Nat.zero_mul, ofFn_zero, flatten]
· simp_rw [ofFn_succ', succ_mul]
simp [flatten_concat, ofFn_add, IH]
rfl
/-- This breaks a list of `m*n` items into `n` groups each containing `m` elements. -/
theorem ofFn_mul' {m n} (f : Fin (m * n) → α) :
List.ofFn f = List.flatten (List.ofFn fun i : Fin n => List.ofFn fun j : Fin m => f ⟨m * i + j,
calc
m * i + j < m * (i + 1) :=
(Nat.add_lt_add_left j.prop _).trans_eq (by rw [Nat.mul_add, Nat.mul_one])
_ ≤ _ := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ i.prop⟩) := by simp_rw [m.mul_comm, ofFn_mul, Fin.cast_mk]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get : ∀ l : List α, (ofFn (get l)) = l
| [] => by rw [ofFn_zero]
| a :: l => by
rw [ofFn_succ]
congr
exact ofFn_get l
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_getElem : ∀ l : List α, (ofFn (fun i : Fin l.length => l[(i : Nat)])) = l
| [] => by rw [ofFn_zero]
| a :: l => by
rw [ofFn_succ]
congr
exact ofFn_get l
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_getElem_eq_map {β : Type*} (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
ofFn (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = l.map f := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, ← map_ofFn, ofFn_getElem]
-- Note there is a now another `mem_ofFn` defined in Lean, with an existential on the RHS,
-- which is marked as a simp lemma.
theorem mem_ofFn' {n} (f : Fin n → α) (a : α) : a ∈ ofFn f ↔ a ∈ Set.range f := by
simp only [mem_iff_get, Set.mem_range, get_ofFn]
exact ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨Fin.cast (by simp) i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨Fin.cast (by simp) i, hi⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_ofFn_iff {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ ofFn f, P i) ↔ ∀ j : Fin n, P (f j) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_const : ∀ (n : ℕ) (c : α), (ofFn fun _ : Fin n => c) = replicate n c
| 0, c => by rw [ofFn_zero, replicate_zero]
| n+1, c => by rw [replicate, ← ofFn_const n]; simp
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_fin_repeat {m} (a : Fin m → α) (n : ℕ) :
List.ofFn (Fin.repeat n a) = (List.replicate n (List.ofFn a)).flatten := by
simp_rw [ofFn_mul, ← ofFn_const, Fin.repeat, Fin.modNat, Nat.add_comm,
Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Fin.is_lt _)]
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_ofFn {R : α → α → Prop} {n} {f : Fin n → α} :
(ofFn f).Pairwise R ↔ ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i < j → R (f i) (f j) := by
simp only [pairwise_iff_getElem, length_ofFn, List.getElem_ofFn,
(Fin.rightInverse_cast length_ofFn).surjective.forall, Fin.forall_iff, Fin.cast_mk,
Fin.mk_lt_mk, forall_comm (α := (_ : Prop)) (β := ℕ)]
lemma getLast_ofFn_succ {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) :
(ofFn f).getLast (mt ofFn_eq_nil_iff.1 (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)) = f (Fin.last _) :=
getLast_ofFn _
@[deprecated getLast_ofFn (since := "2024-11-06")]
theorem last_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) (h : ofFn f ≠ [])
(hn : n - 1 < n := Nat.pred_lt <| ofFn_eq_nil_iff.not.mp h) :
getLast (ofFn f) h = f ⟨n - 1, hn⟩ := by simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
@[deprecated getLast_ofFn_succ (since := "2024-11-06")]
theorem last_ofFn_succ {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α)
(h : ofFn f ≠ [] := mt ofFn_eq_nil_iff.mp (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)) :
getLast (ofFn f) h = f (Fin.last _) :=
getLast_ofFn_succ _
lemma ofFn_cons {n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) : ofFn (Fin.cons a f) = a :: ofFn f := by
rw [ofFn_succ]
rfl
lemma find?_ofFn_eq_some {n} {f : Fin n → α} {p : α → Bool} {b : α} :
(ofFn f).find? p = some b ↔ p b = true ∧ ∃ i, f i = b ∧ ∀ j < i, ¬(p (f j) = true) := by
rw [find?_eq_some_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨hpb, i, hi, hfb, h⟩ ↦
⟨hpb, ⟨⟨i, length_ofFn (f := f) ▸ hi⟩, by simpa using hfb, fun j hj ↦ by simpa using h j hj⟩⟩,
fun ⟨hpb, i, hfb, h⟩ ↦
⟨hpb, ⟨i, (length_ofFn (f := f)).symm ▸ i.isLt, by simpa using hfb,
fun j hj ↦ by simpa using h ⟨j, by omega⟩ (by simpa using hj)⟩⟩⟩
lemma find?_ofFn_eq_some_of_injective {n} {f : Fin n → α} {p : α → Bool} {i : Fin n}
(h : Function.Injective f) :
(ofFn f).find? p = some (f i) ↔ p (f i) = true ∧ ∀ j < i, ¬(p (f j) = true) := by
simp only [find?_ofFn_eq_some, h.eq_iff, Bool.not_eq_true, exists_eq_left]
/-- Lists are equivalent to the sigma type of tuples of a given length. -/
@[simps]
def equivSigmaTuple : List α ≃ Σn, Fin n → α where
toFun l := ⟨l.length, l.get⟩
invFun f := List.ofFn f.2
left_inv := List.ofFn_get
right_inv := fun ⟨_, f⟩ =>
Fin.sigma_eq_of_eq_comp_cast length_ofFn <| funext fun i => get_ofFn f i
/-- A recursor for lists that expands a list into a function mapping to its elements.
This can be used with `induction l using List.ofFnRec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def ofFnRec {C : List α → Sort*} (h : ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), C (List.ofFn f)) (l : List α) : C l :=
cast (congr_arg C l.ofFn_get) <|
h l.length l.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFnRec_ofFn {C : List α → Sort*} (h : ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), C (List.ofFn f)) {n : ℕ}
(f : Fin n → α) : @ofFnRec _ C h (List.ofFn f) = h _ f :=
equivSigmaTuple.rightInverse_symm.cast_eq (fun s => h s.1 s.2) ⟨n, f⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_tuple {P : List α → Prop} :
(∃ l : List α, P l) ↔ ∃ (n : _) (f : Fin n → α), P (List.ofFn f) :=
equivSigmaTuple.symm.surjective.exists.trans Sigma.exists
theorem forall_iff_forall_tuple {P : List α → Prop} :
(∀ l : List α, P l) ↔ ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), P (List.ofFn f) :=
equivSigmaTuple.symm.surjective.forall.trans Sigma.forall
/-- `Fin.sigma_eq_iff_eq_comp_cast` may be useful to work with the RHS of this expression. -/
theorem ofFn_inj' {m n : ℕ} {f : Fin m → α} {g : Fin n → α} :
ofFn f = ofFn g ↔ (⟨m, f⟩ : Σn, Fin n → α) = ⟨n, g⟩ :=
Iff.symm <| equivSigmaTuple.symm.injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- Note we can only state this when the two functions are indexed by defeq `n`. -/
theorem ofFn_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective (ofFn : (Fin n → α) → List α) := fun f g h =>
eq_of_heq <| by rw [ofFn_inj'] at h; cases h; rfl
/-- A special case of `List.ofFn_inj` for when the two functions are indexed by defeq `n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_inj {n : ℕ} {f g : Fin n → α} : ofFn f = ofFn g ↔ f = g :=
ofFn_injective.eq_iff
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/OfFn.lean | 314 | 315 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
@[to_additive nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
attribute [field_simps] div_pow div_zpow
end DivisionCommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left, fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv' : a * b = 1 ↔ b = a⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq, eq_comm]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq' : a * b = 1 ↔ b⁻¹ = a := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inj]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem conj_eq_one_iff : a * b * a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_eq_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_left_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ a / b := by
-- FIXME this could be by `simpa`, but it fails. This is probably a bug in `simpa`.
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ mul_left_injective b⁻¹ h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ b / a := by
-- FIXME see above
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ inv_injective (mul_right_injective b h)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma div_mul_cancel_right (a b : G) : a / (b * a) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_mul_right_eq_div (a b c : G) : a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_div_swap]; simp only [mul_left_inj, eq_self_iff_true, mul_div_cancel_right]
@[to_additive eq_sub_of_add_eq]
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq' (h : a * c = b) : a = b / c := by simp [← h]
@[to_additive sub_eq_of_eq_add]
theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul'' (h : a = c * b) : a / b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq (h : a / c = b) : a = b * c := by simp [← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_div (h : a = c / b) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_right_inj : a / b = a / c ↔ b = c :=
div_right_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_left_inj : b / a = c / a ↔ b = c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_left_inj _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a / b * (b / c) = a / c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_div_cancel_right (a b c : G) : a / c / (b / c) = a / b := by
rw [← inv_div c b, div_inv_eq_mul, div_mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_one : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_div_eq_one, fun h ↦ by rw [h, div_self']⟩
alias ⟨_, div_eq_one_of_eq⟩ := div_eq_one
alias ⟨_, sub_eq_zero_of_eq⟩ := sub_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one : a / b ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr div_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_self : a / b = a ↔ b = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_left, inv_eq_one]
@[to_additive eq_sub_iff_add_eq]
theorem eq_div_iff_mul_eq' : a = b / c ↔ a * c = b := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul : a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_eq_of_div_eq_div (H : a / b = c / d) : a = b ↔ c = d := by
rw [← div_eq_one, H, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_div_mul_left (c : G) : Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ x / c) fun x ↦ x * c :=
fun x ↦ mul_div_cancel_right x c
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_mul_left_div (c : G) : Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ x * c) fun x ↦ x / c :=
fun x ↦ div_mul_cancel x c
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_mul_right_inv_mul (c : G) :
Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ c * x) fun x ↦ c⁻¹ * x :=
fun x ↦ mul_inv_cancel_left c x
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv_mul_mul_right (c : G) :
Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ c⁻¹ * x) fun x ↦ c * x :=
fun x ↦ inv_mul_cancel_left c x
@[to_additive (attr := simp) natAbs_nsmul_eq_zero]
lemma pow_natAbs_eq_one : a ^ n.natAbs = 1 ↔ a ^ n = 1 := by cases n <;> simp
@[to_additive sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub (a : G) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq <| by rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_neg]
theorem inv_pow_sub (a : G) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a⁻¹ ^ (m - n) = (a ^ m)⁻¹ * a ^ n := by
rw [pow_sub a⁻¹ h, inv_pow, inv_pow, inv_inv]
@[to_additive add_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_add_one (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a
| (n : ℕ) => by simp only [← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast, pow_succ]
| -1 => by simp [Int.add_left_neg]
| .negSucc (n + 1) => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, pow_succ', mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
rw [Int.negSucc_eq, Int.neg_add, Int.neg_add_cancel_right]
exact zpow_negSucc _ _
@[to_additive sub_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_sub_one (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n * a⁻¹ :=
calc
a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ (n - 1) * a * a⁻¹ := (mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a ^ n * a⁻¹ := by rw [← zpow_add_one, Int.sub_add_cancel]
@[to_additive add_zsmul]
lemma zpow_add (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m + n) = a ^ m * a ^ n := by
induction n with
| hz => simp
| hp n ihn => simp only [← Int.add_assoc, zpow_add_one, ihn, mul_assoc]
| hn n ihn => rw [zpow_sub_one, ← mul_assoc, ← ihn, ← zpow_sub_one, Int.add_sub_assoc]
@[to_additive one_add_zsmul]
lemma zpow_one_add (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (1 + n) = a * a ^ n := by rw [zpow_add, zpow_one]
@[to_additive add_zsmul_self]
lemma mul_self_zpow (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a * a ^ n = a ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one]
@[to_additive add_self_zsmul]
lemma mul_zpow_self (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ n * a = a ^ (n + 1) := (zpow_add_one ..).symm
@[to_additive sub_zsmul] lemma zpow_sub (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive natCast_sub_natCast_zsmul]
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_natCast (a : G) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ (m - n : ℤ) = a ^ m / a ^ n := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a m n
@[to_additive natCast_sub_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_one (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n - 1 : ℤ) = a ^ n / a := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a n 1
@[to_additive one_sub_natCast_zsmul]
lemma zpow_one_sub_natCast (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (1 - n : ℤ) = a / a ^ n := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a 1 n
@[to_additive] lemma zpow_mul_comm (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ m * a ^ n = a ^ n * a ^ m := by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.add_comm, zpow_add]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_emod {x : G} (m : ℤ) {n : ℤ} (h : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m = x ^ (m % n) :=
calc
x ^ m = x ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
_ = x ^ (m % n) := by simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, h]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_emod' {x : G} (m : ℤ) {n : ℕ} (h : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m = x ^ (m % (n : ℤ)) := zpow_eq_zpow_emod m (by simpa)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma zpow_iterate (k : ℤ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : G ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp [Int.pow_zero]
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [zpow_iterate, Int.pow_succ', zpow_mul]
/-- To show a property of all powers of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under multiplication
by `g` and `g⁻¹` on the left. For subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`Subgroup.closure_induction_left`. -/
@[to_additive "To show a property of all multiples of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under
addition by `g` and `-g` on the left. For additive subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`AddSubgroup.closure_induction_left`."]
lemma zpow_induction_left {g : G} {P : G → Prop} (h_one : P (1 : G))
(h_mul : ∀ a, P a → P (g * a)) (h_inv : ∀ a, P a → P (g⁻¹ * a)) (n : ℤ) : P (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| hz => rwa [zpow_zero]
| hp n ih =>
rw [Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one]
exact h_mul _ ih
| hn n ih =>
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_neg_one]
exact h_inv _ ih
/-- To show a property of all powers of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under multiplication
by `g` and `g⁻¹` on the right. For subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`Subgroup.closure_induction_right`. -/
@[to_additive "To show a property of all multiples of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under
addition by `g` and `-g` on the right. For additive subgroups generated by more than one element,
see `AddSubgroup.closure_induction_right`."]
lemma zpow_induction_right {g : G} {P : G → Prop} (h_one : P (1 : G))
(h_mul : ∀ a, P a → P (a * g)) (h_inv : ∀ a, P a → P (a * g⁻¹)) (n : ℤ) : P (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| hz => rwa [zpow_zero]
| hp n ih =>
rw [zpow_add_one]
exact h_mul _ ih
| hn n ih =>
rw [zpow_sub_one]
exact h_inv _ ih
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] {a b c d : G}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul' {a b c : G} (h : a = b * c) : a / b = c := by
rw [h, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_mul_left_eq_div (a b c : G) : c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm b⁻¹ c⁻¹, mul_comm c a, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc c,
mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive eq_sub_of_add_eq']
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq'' (h : c * a = b) : a = b / c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq' (h : a / b = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_div' (h : b = c / a) : a * b = c := by
rw [h, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm c, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive sub_sub_self]
theorem div_div_self' (a b : G) : a / (a / b) = b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_mul_div (a b c : G) : a / b = c / b * (a / c) := by simp [mul_left_comm c]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_cancel (a b : G) : a / (a / b) = b :=
div_div_self' a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_cancel_left (a b : G) : a / b / a = b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive eq_sub_iff_add_eq']
theorem eq_div_iff_mul_eq'' : a = b / c ↔ c * a = b := by rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul' : a / b = c ↔ a = b * c := by rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_cancel_left (a b : G) : a * b / a = b := by rw [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a b : G) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_cancel_left (a b : G) : a / (a * b) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_left]
-- This lemma is in the `simp` set under the name `mul_inv_cancel_comm_assoc`,
-- along with the additive version `add_neg_cancel_comm_assoc`,
-- defined in `Algebra.Group.Commute`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_inv_cancel'_right (a b : G) : a * (b * a⁻¹) = b := by
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel a b]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_mul_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a * c * (b / c) = a * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_mul_cancel (a b c : G) : a / c * (b * c) = a * b := by
rw [mul_left_comm, div_mul_cancel, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_div_cancel' (a b c : G) : a / b * (c / a) = c / b := by
rw [mul_comm]; apply div_mul_div_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a * b / (a / c) = b * c := by
rw [← div_mul, mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_div_cancel_left (a b c : G) : c / a / (c / b) = b / a := by
rw [← inv_div b c, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_mul_eq_mul : a / b = c / d ↔ a * d = c * b := by
rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, div_mul_eq_mul_div, eq_comm, div_eq_iff_eq_mul']
simp only [mul_comm, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_div_eq_div : a / b = c / d ↔ a / c = b / d := by
rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_eq_iff_eq_mul', mul_div_assoc]
end CommGroup
section multiplicative
variable [Monoid β] (p r : α → α → Prop) [IsTotal α r] (f : α → α → β)
@[to_additive additive_of_symmetric_of_isTotal]
lemma multiplicative_of_symmetric_of_isTotal
(hsymm : Symmetric p) (hf_swap : ∀ {a b}, p a b → f a b * f b a = 1)
(hmul : ∀ {a b c}, r a b → r b c → p a b → p b c → p a c → f a c = f a b * f b c)
{a b c : α} (pab : p a b) (pbc : p b c) (pac : p a c) : f a c = f a b * f b c := by
have hmul' : ∀ {b c}, r b c → p a b → p b c → p a c → f a c = f a b * f b c := by
intros b c rbc pab pbc pac
obtain rab | rba := total_of r a b
· exact hmul rab rbc pab pbc pac
rw [← one_mul (f a c), ← hf_swap pab, mul_assoc]
obtain rac | rca := total_of r a c
| · rw [hmul rba rac (hsymm pab) pac pbc]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 1,026 | 1,026 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Sets in sigma types
This file defines `Set.sigma`, the indexed sum of sets.
-/
namespace Set
variable {ι ι' : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
{u : Set (Σ i, α i)} {x : Σ i, α i} {i j : ι} {a : α i}
@[simp]
theorem range_sigmaMk (i : ι) : range (Sigma.mk i : α i → Sigma α) = Sigma.fst ⁻¹' {i} := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨b, rfl⟩
simp
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl | _)
exact mem_range_self y
theorem preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne (h : i ≠ j) (s : Set (α j)) :
Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk j '' s) = ∅ := by
ext x
simp [h.symm]
theorem image_sigmaMk_preimage_sigmaMap_subset {β : ι' → Type*} (f : ι → ι')
(g : ∀ i, α i → β (f i)) (i : ι) (s : Set (β (f i))) :
Sigma.mk i '' (g i ⁻¹' s) ⊆ Sigma.map f g ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk (f i) '' s) :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ ⟨g i x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem image_sigmaMk_preimage_sigmaMap {β : ι' → Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(g : ∀ i, α i → β (f i)) (i : ι) (s : Set (β (f i))) :
Sigma.mk i '' (g i ⁻¹' s) = Sigma.map f g ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk (f i) '' s) := by
refine (image_sigmaMk_preimage_sigmaMap_subset f g i s).antisymm ?_
rintro ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨y, hys, hxy⟩
simp only [hf.eq_iff, Sigma.map, Sigma.ext_iff] at hxy
rcases hxy with ⟨rfl, hxy⟩; rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst y
exact ⟨x, hys, rfl⟩
/-- Indexed sum of sets. `s.sigma t` is the set of dependent pairs `⟨i, a⟩` such that `i ∈ s` and
`a ∈ t i`. -/
protected def sigma (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : Set (Σ i, α i) := {x | x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t x.1}
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma_iff : x ∈ s.sigma t ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t x.1 := Iff.rfl
theorem mk_sigma_iff : (⟨i, a⟩ : Σ i, α i) ∈ s.sigma t ↔ i ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t i := Iff.rfl
theorem mk_mem_sigma (hi : i ∈ s) (ha : a ∈ t i) : (⟨i, a⟩ : Σ i, α i) ∈ s.sigma t := ⟨hi, ha⟩
theorem sigma_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : ∀ i, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ := fun _ hx ↦
⟨hs hx.1, ht _ hx.2⟩
theorem sigma_subset_iff :
s.sigma t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t i → (⟨i, a⟩ : Σ i, α i) ∈ u :=
⟨fun h _ hi _ ha ↦ h <| mk_mem_sigma hi ha, fun h _ ha ↦ h ha.1 ha.2⟩
theorem forall_sigma_iff {p : (Σ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ s.sigma t, p x) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t i → p ⟨i, a⟩ := sigma_subset_iff
theorem exists_sigma_iff {p : (Σi, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ s.sigma t, p x) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, ∃ a ∈ t i, p ⟨i, a⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨i, a⟩, ha, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i, ha.1, a, ha.2, h⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, a, ha, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨i, a⟩, ⟨hi, ha⟩, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sigma_empty : s.sigma (fun i ↦ (∅ : Set (α i))) = ∅ :=
ext fun _ ↦ iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp] theorem empty_sigma : (∅ : Set ι).sigma t = ∅ := ext fun _ ↦ iff_of_eq (false_and _)
theorem univ_sigma_univ : (@univ ι).sigma (fun _ ↦ @univ (α i)) = univ :=
ext fun _ ↦ iff_of_eq (true_and _)
@[simp]
theorem sigma_univ : s.sigma (fun _ ↦ univ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) = Sigma.fst ⁻¹' s :=
ext fun _ ↦ iff_of_eq (and_true _)
@[simp] theorem univ_sigma_preimage_mk (s : Set (Σ i, α i)) :
(univ : Set ι).sigma (fun i ↦ Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem singleton_sigma : ({i} : Set ι).sigma t = Sigma.mk i '' t i :=
ext fun x ↦ by
constructor
· obtain ⟨j, a⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : j = i, ha⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ha
· rintro ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem sigma_singleton {a : ∀ i, α i} :
s.sigma (fun i ↦ ({a i} : Set (α i))) = (fun i ↦ Sigma.mk i <| a i) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem singleton_sigma_singleton {a : ∀ i, α i} :
(({i} : Set ι).sigma fun i ↦ ({a i} : Set (α i))) = {⟨i, a i⟩} := by
rw [sigma_singleton, image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem union_sigma : (s₁ ∪ s₂).sigma t = s₁.sigma t ∪ s₂.sigma t := ext fun _ ↦ or_and_right
@[simp]
theorem sigma_union : s.sigma (fun i ↦ t₁ i ∪ t₂ i) = s.sigma t₁ ∪ s.sigma t₂ :=
ext fun _ ↦ and_or_left
theorem sigma_inter_sigma : s₁.sigma t₁ ∩ s₂.sigma t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂).sigma fun i ↦ t₁ i ∩ t₂ i := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
|
variable {β : Type*} [CompleteLattice β]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Sigma.lean | 117 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lorenzo Luccioli, Rémy Degenne, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Probability.Moments.ComplexMGF
/-!
# Gaussian distributions over ℝ
We define a Gaussian measure over the reals.
## Main definitions
* `gaussianPDFReal`: the function `μ v x ↦ (1 / (sqrt (2 * pi * v))) * exp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))`,
which is the probability density function of a Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v` (when `v ≠ 0`).
* `gaussianPDF`: `ℝ≥0∞`-valued pdf, `gaussianPDF μ v x = ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)`.
* `gaussianReal`: a Gaussian measure on `ℝ`, parametrized by its mean `μ` and variance `v`.
If `v = 0`, this is `dirac μ`, otherwise it is defined as the measure with density
`gaussianPDF μ v` with respect to the Lebesgue measure.
## Main results
* `gaussianReal_add_const`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `X + y` is Gaussian with mean `μ + y` and variance `v`.
* `gaussianReal_const_mul`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `c * X` is Gaussian with mean `c * μ` and variance `c^2 * v`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Real Complex
open MeasureTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section GaussianPDF
/-- Probability density function of the gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))
lemma gaussianPDFReal_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v =
fun x ↦ (Real.sqrt (2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v)) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_zero_var (m : ℝ) : gaussianPDFReal m 0 = 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [gaussianPDFReal]
/-- The gaussian pdf is positive when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_pos (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) (hv : v ≠ 0) : 0 < gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is nonnegative. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_nonneg (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(((measurable_id.add_const _).pow_const _).neg.div_const _).exp.const_mul _
/-- The gaussian pdf is strongly measurable. -/
lemma stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
StronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).stronglyMeasurable
@[fun_prop]
lemma integrable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
Integrable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal_def]
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp [hv]
let g : ℝ → ℝ := fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- x ^ 2 / (2 * v))
have hg : Integrable g := by
suffices g = fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (2 * v)⁻¹ * x ^ 2) by
rw [this]
refine (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq ?_).const_mul (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹
simp [lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) (Ne.symm hv)]
ext x
simp only [g, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe, Real.sqrt_mul',
mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_inv, NNReal.coe_ofNat, neg_mul, mul_eq_mul_left_iff,
Real.exp_eq_exp, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Real.sqrt_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, hv,
false_or]
rw [mul_comm]
left
field_simp
exact Integrable.comp_sub_right hg μ
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_one_iff]
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) volume :=
(stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).aestronglyMeasurable
have hf : 0 ≤ₐₛ gaussianPDFReal μ v := ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v)
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfm]
simp only [gaussianPDFReal, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, one_div,
Nat.cast_ofNat, integral_const_mul]
rw [integral_sub_right_eq_self (μ := volume) (fun a ↦ rexp (-a ^ 2 / ((2 : ℝ) * v))) μ]
simp only [zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv_rev,
mul_neg]
simp_rw [← neg_mul]
rw [neg_mul, integral_gaussian, ← Real.sqrt_inv, ← Real.sqrt_mul]
· field_simp
ring
· positivity
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma integral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
∫ x, gaussianPDFReal μ v x = 1 := by
have h := lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ hv
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _)
(ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)), ← ENNReal.ofReal_one] at h
rwa [← ENNReal.ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff (integral_nonneg (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)) zero_le_one]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_sub {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x - y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ + y) v x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal]
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_add {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x + y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ - y) v x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← gaussianPDFReal_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c⁻¹ * x) = |c| * gaussianPDFReal (c * μ) (⟨c^2, sq_nonneg _⟩ * v) x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal.eq_1, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe,
Real.sqrt_mul', one_div, mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_mk, NNReal.coe_pos]
rw [← mul_assoc]
refine congr_arg₂ _ ?_ ?_
· field_simp
rw [Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs]
ring_nf
calc (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹
= (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * (|c| * |c|⁻¹) := by
rw [mul_inv_cancel₀, mul_one]
simp only [ne_eq, abs_eq_zero, hc, not_false_eq_true]
_ = (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * |c| * |c|⁻¹ := by ring
· congr 1
field_simp
congr 1
ring
lemma gaussianPDFReal_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c * x)
= |c⁻¹| * gaussianPDFReal (c⁻¹ * μ) (⟨(c^2)⁻¹, inv_nonneg.mpr (sq_nonneg _)⟩ * v) x := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_inv c, gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul (inv_ne_zero hc)]
simp
/-- The pdf of a Gaussian distribution on ℝ with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ := ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)
lemma gaussianPDF_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDF μ v = fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDF_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianPDF μ 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [gaussianPDF]
@[simp]
lemma toReal_gaussianPDF {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x : ℝ) :
(gaussianPDF μ v x).toReal = gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v x)]
lemma gaussianPDF_pos (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) : 0 < gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact gaussianPDFReal_pos _ _ _ hv
lemma gaussianPDF_lt_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x < ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
lemma gaussianPDF_ne_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x ≠ ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
lemma measurable_gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDF μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal _ _).ennreal_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDF_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, gaussianPDF μ v x = 1 :=
lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ h
end GaussianPDF
section GaussianReal
/-- A Gaussian distribution on `ℝ` with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measure ℝ :=
if v = 0 then Measure.dirac μ else volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v)
lemma gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
gaussianReal μ v = volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v) := if_neg hv
@[simp]
lemma gaussianReal_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianReal μ 0 = Measure.dirac μ := if_pos rfl
instance instIsProbabilityMeasureGaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
| IsProbabilityMeasure (gaussianReal μ v) where
measure_univ := by by_cases h : v = 0 <;> simp [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero, h]
lemma gaussianReal_apply (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
gaussianReal μ v s = ∫⁻ x in s, gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv, withDensity_apply' _ s]
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Gaussian.lean | 205 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, Complex.norm_real, norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hx, log_neg_eq_log,
Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
@[bound]
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
@[bound]
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
@[bound]
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
lemma rpow_inv_log (hx₀ : 0 < x) (hx₁ : x ≠ 1) : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ = exp 1 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx₀, mul_inv_cancel₀]
exact log_ne_zero.2 ⟨hx₀.ne', hx₁, (hx₀.trans' <| by norm_num).ne'⟩
/-- See `Real.rpow_inv_log` for the equality when `x ≠ 1` is strictly positive. -/
lemma rpow_inv_log_le_exp_one : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ ≤ exp 1 := by
calc
_ ≤ |x ^ (log x)⁻¹| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |x| ^ (log x)⁻¹ := abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow ..
rw [← log_abs]
obtain hx | hx := (abs_nonneg x).eq_or_gt
· simp [hx]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]
gcongr
exact mul_inv_le_one
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.rpow_const {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : HasCompactSupport f) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : HasCompactSupport (fun x ↦ f x ^ r) :=
hf.comp_left (g := (· ^ r)) (Real.zero_rpow hr)
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, norm_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx),
ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(‖x‖ ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [norm_pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem norm_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, norm_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz)]
theorem norm_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact norm_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [norm_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, norm_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
theorem norm_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : ‖z ^ w‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (norm_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : ‖x ^ (y : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : ‖x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← norm_cpow_real]; simp
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : ‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ y.re := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hx.le]
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ re y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonneg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_ne_zero := norm_cpow_of_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_imp := norm_cpow_of_imp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_le := norm_cpow_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_real := norm_cpow_real
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_inv_nat := norm_cpow_inv_nat
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
open Filter in
lemma norm_ofReal_cpow_eventually_eq_atTop (c : ℂ) :
(fun t : ℝ ↦ ‖(t : ℂ) ^ c‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun t ↦ t ^ c.re := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ht]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_pow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_zpow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_intCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_add_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
lemma rpow_add_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_sub_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y (-n)
lemma rpow_sub_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_add_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel₀ hn0, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel₀ hn0, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; rcases hx with hx | hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv₀, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx)
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg {x y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y < x) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z < y ^ z := by
have hx : 0 < x := hy.trans hxy
rw [← neg_neg z, Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) (-z), Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy) (-z),
inv_lt_inv₀ (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)]
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by positivity) hxy <| neg_pos_of_neg hz
theorem strictAntiOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
StrictAntiOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg ha hab hr
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with hz_zero | rfl
case inl =>
rcases ne_or_eq x y with hxy' | rfl
case inl =>
exact le_of_lt <| rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg hy (Ne.lt_of_le (id (Ne.symm hxy')) hxy)
(Ne.lt_of_le hz_zero hz)
case inr => simp
case inr => simp
theorem antitoneOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_nonpos {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos ha hab hr
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ y ≤ z := by
have x_pos : 0 < x := lt_trans zero_lt_one hx
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos y) (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos z), log_rpow x_pos,
log_rpow x_pos, mul_le_mul_right (log_pos hx)]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ y < z := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hx, lt_iff_not_le]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1)
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1)
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ z ≤ y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 y) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 z), log_rpow hx0, log_rpow hx0,
mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (log_neg hx0 hx1)]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ z < y := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx0 hx1, lt_iff_not_le]
theorem rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x ^ z := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x ^ z := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx.le, log_neg_iff hx]
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
x ^ y < 1 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· rcases _root_.em (y = 0) with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*, lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one]
· simp [rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos hx, hx.ne.symm]
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff' {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 < y) :
x ^ y < 1 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff hx zero_le_one hy, Real.one_rpow]
theorem one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, one_lt_exp_iff, mul_pos_iff, log_pos_iff hx.le, log_neg_iff hx]
theorem one_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ 0 < x ∧ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· rcases _root_.em (y = 0) with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*, lt_irrefl, (zero_lt_one' ℝ).not_lt]
· simp [one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hx, hx]
/-- This is a more general but less convenient version of `rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge`.
This version allows `x = 0`, so it explicitly forbids `x = y = 0`, `z ≠ 0`. -/
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge_of_imp (hx0 : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y)
(h : x = 0 → y = 0 → z = 0) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx0 with (rfl | hx0')
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy0
· rw [h rfl rfl]
· rw [zero_rpow hy0]
apply zero_rpow_nonneg
· exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0' hx1 hyz
/-- This version of `rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge` allows `x = 0` but requires `0 ≤ z`.
See also `rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge_of_imp` for the most general version. -/
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge' (hx0 : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge_of_imp hx0 hx1 hyz fun _ hy ↦ le_antisymm (hyz.trans_eq hy) hz
lemma rpow_max {x y p : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
(max x y) ^ p = max (x ^ p) (y ^ p) := by
rcases le_total x y with hxy | hxy
· rw [max_eq_right hxy, max_eq_right (rpow_le_rpow hx hxy hp)]
· rw [max_eq_left hxy, max_eq_left (rpow_le_rpow hy hxy hp)]
theorem self_le_rpow_of_le_one (h₁ : 0 ≤ x) (h₂ : x ≤ 1) (h₃ : y ≤ 1) : x ≤ x ^ y := by
simpa only [rpow_one]
using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge_of_imp h₁ h₂ h₃ fun _ ↦ (absurd · one_ne_zero)
theorem self_le_rpow_of_one_le (h₁ : 1 ≤ x) (h₂ : 1 ≤ y) : x ≤ x ^ y := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one (h₁ : 0 ≤ x) (h₂ : x ≤ 1) (h₃ : 1 ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x := by
simpa only [rpow_one]
using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge_of_imp h₁ h₂ h₃ fun _ ↦ (absurd · (one_pos.trans_le h₃).ne')
theorem rpow_le_self_of_one_le (h₁ : 1 ≤ x) (h₂ : y ≤ 1) : x ^ y ≤ x := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le h₁ h₂
theorem self_lt_rpow_of_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : x < 1) (h₃ : y < 1) : x < x ^ y := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt h₁ h₂ h₃
theorem self_lt_rpow_of_one_lt (h₁ : 1 < x) (h₂ : 1 < y) : x < x ^ y := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_self_of_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : x < 1) (h₃ : 1 < y) : x ^ y < x := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt h₁ h₂ h₃
theorem rpow_lt_self_of_one_lt (h₁ : 1 < x) (h₂ : y < 1) : x ^ y < x := by
simpa only [rpow_one] using rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_left_injOn {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : InjOn (fun y : ℝ => y ^ x) { y : ℝ | 0 ≤ y } := by
rintro y hy z hz (hyz : y ^ x = z ^ x)
rw [← rpow_one y, ← rpow_one z, ← mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, rpow_mul hy, rpow_mul hz, hyz]
lemma rpow_left_inj (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injOn hz).eq_iff hx hy
lemma rpow_inv_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_left_inj _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow hx hz]; positivity
lemma eq_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_left_inj hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow hy hz]; positivity
theorem le_rpow_iff_log_le (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ y ^ z ↔ log x ≤ z * log y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff hx (rpow_pos_of_pos hy z), log_rpow hy]
lemma le_pow_iff_log_le (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ y ^ n ↔ log x ≤ n * log y :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ le_rpow_iff_log_le hx hy
lemma le_zpow_iff_log_le {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ y ^ n ↔ log x ≤ n * log y :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ le_rpow_iff_log_le hx hy
lemma le_rpow_of_log_le (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ z * log y) : x ≤ y ^ z := by
obtain hx | hx := le_or_lt x 0
· exact hx.trans (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _).le
· exact (le_rpow_iff_log_le hx hy).2 h
lemma le_pow_of_log_le (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ n * log y) : x ≤ y ^ n :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ le_rpow_of_log_le hy h
lemma le_zpow_of_log_le {n : ℤ} (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ n * log y) : x ≤ y ^ n :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ le_rpow_of_log_le hy h
theorem lt_rpow_iff_log_lt (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x < y ^ z ↔ log x < z * log y := by
rw [← log_lt_log_iff hx (rpow_pos_of_pos hy z), log_rpow hy]
lemma lt_pow_iff_log_lt (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x < y ^ n ↔ log x < n * log y :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ lt_rpow_iff_log_lt hx hy
lemma lt_zpow_iff_log_lt {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x < y ^ n ↔ log x < n * log y :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ lt_rpow_iff_log_lt hx hy
lemma lt_rpow_of_log_lt (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < z * log y) : x < y ^ z := by
obtain hx | hx := le_or_lt x 0
· exact hx.trans_lt (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)
· exact (lt_rpow_iff_log_lt hx hy).2 h
lemma lt_pow_of_log_lt (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < n * log y) : x < y ^ n :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ lt_rpow_of_log_lt hy h
lemma lt_zpow_of_log_lt {n : ℤ} (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < n * log y) : x < y ^ n :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ lt_rpow_of_log_lt hy h
lemma rpow_le_iff_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ z ≤ y ↔ z * log x ≤ log y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hy, log_rpow hx]
lemma pow_le_iff_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ n ≤ y ↔ n * log x ≤ log y := by
rw [← rpow_le_iff_le_log hx hy, rpow_natCast]
lemma zpow_le_iff_le_log {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ n ≤ y ↔ n * log x ≤ log y := by
rw [← rpow_le_iff_le_log hx hy, rpow_intCast]
lemma le_log_of_rpow_le (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ z ≤ y) : z * log x ≤ log y :=
log_rpow hx _ ▸ log_le_log (by positivity) h
lemma le_log_of_pow_le (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ n ≤ y) : n * log x ≤ log y :=
le_log_of_rpow_le hx (rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ h)
lemma le_log_of_zpow_le {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ n ≤ y) : n * log x ≤ log y :=
le_log_of_rpow_le hx (rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ h)
lemma rpow_le_of_le_log (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ z * log y) : x ≤ y ^ z := by
obtain hx | hx := le_or_lt x 0
· exact hx.trans (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _).le
· exact (le_rpow_iff_log_le hx hy).2 h
lemma pow_le_of_le_log (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ n * log y) : x ≤ y ^ n :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ rpow_le_of_le_log hy h
lemma zpow_le_of_le_log {n : ℤ} (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x ≤ n * log y) : x ≤ y ^ n :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ rpow_le_of_le_log hy h
lemma rpow_lt_iff_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ z < y ↔ z * log x < log y := by
rw [← log_lt_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hy, log_rpow hx]
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ n < y ↔ n * log x < log y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_iff_lt_log hx hy, rpow_natCast]
lemma zpow_lt_iff_lt_log {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ n < y ↔ n * log x < log y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_iff_lt_log hx hy, rpow_intCast]
lemma lt_log_of_rpow_lt (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ z < y) : z * log x < log y :=
log_rpow hx _ ▸ log_lt_log (by positivity) h
lemma lt_log_of_pow_lt (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ n < y) : n * log x < log y :=
lt_log_of_rpow_lt hx (rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ h)
lemma lt_log_of_zpow_lt {n : ℤ} (hx : 0 < x) (h : x ^ n < y) : n * log x < log y :=
lt_log_of_rpow_lt hx (rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ h)
lemma rpow_lt_of_lt_log (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < z * log y) : x < y ^ z := by
obtain hx | hx := le_or_lt x 0
· exact hx.trans_lt (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)
· exact (lt_rpow_iff_log_lt hx hy).2 h
lemma pow_lt_of_lt_log (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < n * log y) : x < y ^ n :=
rpow_natCast _ _ ▸ rpow_lt_of_lt_log hy h
lemma zpow_lt_of_lt_log {n : ℤ} (hy : 0 < y) (h : log x < n * log y) : x < y ^ n :=
rpow_intCast _ _ ▸ rpow_lt_of_lt_log hy h
theorem rpow_le_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ x ∧ y ≤ 0 ∨ x ≤ 1 ∧ 0 ≤ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_le_one_iff, mul_nonpos_iff, log_nonneg_iff hx, log_nonpos_iff hx.le]
/-- Bound for `|log x * x ^ t|` in the interval `(0, 1]`, for positive real `t`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_rpow_lt (x t : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) (ht : 0 < t) :
|log x * x ^ t| < 1 / t := by
rw [lt_div_iff₀ ht]
have := abs_log_mul_self_lt (x ^ t) (rpow_pos_of_pos h1 t) (rpow_le_one h1.le h2 ht.le)
rwa [log_rpow h1, mul_assoc, abs_mul, abs_of_pos ht, mul_comm] at this
/-- `log x` is bounded above by a multiple of every power of `x` with positive exponent. -/
lemma log_le_rpow_div {x ε : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) : log x ≤ x ^ ε / ε := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with rfl | h
· rw [log_zero, zero_rpow hε.ne', zero_div]
rw [le_div_iff₀' hε]
exact (log_rpow h ε).symm.trans_le <| (log_le_sub_one_of_pos <| rpow_pos_of_pos h ε).trans
(sub_one_lt _).le
/-- The (real) logarithm of a natural number `n` is bounded by a multiple of every power of `n`
with positive exponent. -/
lemma log_natCast_le_rpow_div (n : ℕ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : log n ≤ n ^ ε / ε :=
log_le_rpow_div n.cast_nonneg hε
lemma strictMono_rpow_of_base_gt_one {b : ℝ} (hb : 1 < b) :
StrictMono (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hb)]
exact exp_strictMono.comp <| StrictMono.const_mul strictMono_id <| Real.log_pos hb
lemma monotone_rpow_of_base_ge_one {b : ℝ} (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
Monotone (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hb with hb | rfl
case inl => exact (strictMono_rpow_of_base_gt_one hb).monotone
case inr => intro _ _ _; simp
lemma strictAnti_rpow_of_base_lt_one {b : ℝ} (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
StrictAnti (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos hb₀]
exact exp_strictMono.comp_strictAnti <| StrictMono.const_mul_of_neg strictMono_id
<| Real.log_neg hb₀ hb₁
lemma antitone_rpow_of_base_le_one {b : ℝ} (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) :
Antitone (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hb₁ with hb₁ | rfl
case inl => exact (strictAnti_rpow_of_base_lt_one hb₀ hb₁).antitone
case inr => intro _ _ _; simp
lemma rpow_right_inj (hx₀ : 0 < x) (hx₁ : x ≠ 1) : x ^ y = x ^ z ↔ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ by rw [H]⟩
rcases hx₁.lt_or_lt with h | h
· exact (strictAnti_rpow_of_base_lt_one hx₀ h).injective H
· exact (strictMono_rpow_of_base_gt_one h).injective H
/-- Guessing rule for the `bound` tactic: when trying to prove `x ^ y ≤ x ^ z`, we can either assume
`1 ≤ x` or `0 < x ≤ 1`. -/
@[bound] lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le_or_ge {x y z : ℝ}
(h : 1 ≤ x ∧ y ≤ z ∨ 0 < x ∧ x ≤ 1 ∧ z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rcases h with ⟨x1, yz⟩ | ⟨x0, x1, zy⟩
· exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le x1 yz
· exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge x0 x1 zy
end Real
namespace Complex
lemma norm_prime_cpow_le_one_half (p : Nat.Primes) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < s.re) :
‖(p : ℂ) ^ (-s)‖ ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero p <| by rw [neg_re]; linarith only [hs]]
refine (Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos zero_lt_two (Nat.cast_le.mpr p.prop.two_le) <|
by rw [neg_re]; linarith only [hs]).trans ?_
rw [one_div, ← Real.rpow_neg_one]
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le one_le_two <| (neg_lt_neg hs).le
lemma one_sub_prime_cpow_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < s.re) :
1 - (p : ℂ) ^ (-s) ≠ 0 := by
refine sub_ne_zero_of_ne fun H ↦ ?_
have := norm_prime_cpow_le_one_half ⟨p, hp⟩ hs
simp only at this
rw [← H, norm_one] at this
norm_num at this
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_le_norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {w z : ℂ}
(h : w.re ≤ z.re) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ w‖ ≤ ‖(n : ℂ) ^ z‖ := by
simp_rw [norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn]
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (by exact_mod_cast hn) h
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_le_norm_natCast_cpow_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 1 < n) {w z : ℂ} :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ w‖ ≤ ‖(n : ℂ) ^ z‖ ↔ w.re ≤ z.re := by
simp_rw [norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt hn),
Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (Nat.one_lt_cast.mpr hn)]
lemma norm_log_natCast_le_rpow_div (n : ℕ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ‖log n‖ ≤ n ^ ε / ε := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | h
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_zero, log_zero, norm_zero, Real.zero_rpow hε.ne', zero_div]
rw [← natCast_log, norm_real, norm_of_nonneg <| Real.log_nonneg <| by
exact_mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt h.lt]
exact Real.log_natCast_le_rpow_div n hε
end Complex
/-!
## Square roots of reals
-/
namespace Real
variable {z x y : ℝ}
section Sqrt
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ) : √x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
obtain h | h := le_or_lt 0 x
· rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (rpow_nonneg h _), mul_self_sqrt h, ← sq,
← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul h]
norm_num
· have : 1 / (2 : ℝ) * π = π / (2 : ℝ) := by ring
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos h.le, rpow_def_of_neg h, this, cos_pi_div_two, mul_zero]
theorem rpow_div_two_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (r : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ (r / 2) = √x ^ r := by
rw [sqrt_eq_rpow, ← rpow_mul hx]
congr
ring
end Sqrt
end Real
namespace Complex
lemma cpow_inv_two_re (x : ℂ) : (x ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ)).re = sqrt ((‖x‖ + x.re) / 2) := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_inv, cpow_ofReal_re, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ← one_div,
← Real.sqrt_eq_rpow, cos_half, ← sqrt_mul, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_add, mul_one, norm_mul_cos_arg]
exacts [norm_nonneg _, (neg_pi_lt_arg _).le, arg_le_pi _]
lemma cpow_inv_two_im_eq_sqrt {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.im) :
(x ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ)).im = sqrt ((‖x‖ - x.re) / 2) := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_inv, cpow_ofReal_im, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ← one_div,
← Real.sqrt_eq_rpow, sin_half_eq_sqrt, ← sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _), ← mul_div_assoc, mul_sub,
mul_one, norm_mul_cos_arg]
· rwa [arg_nonneg_iff]
· linarith [pi_pos, arg_le_pi x]
lemma cpow_inv_two_im_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℂ} (hx : x.im < 0) :
(x ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ)).im = -sqrt ((‖x‖ - x.re) / 2) := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_inv, cpow_ofReal_im, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ← one_div,
| ← Real.sqrt_eq_rpow, sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt, mul_neg, ← sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _),
← mul_div_assoc, mul_sub, mul_one, norm_mul_cos_arg]
· linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_arg x]
· exact (arg_neg_iff.2 hx).le
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 1,014 | 1,017 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Jujian Zhang, Yongle Hu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Colimit.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.CharacterModule
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Injective
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Projective
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Small
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
/-!
# Flat modules
A module `M` over a commutative semiring `R` is *mono-flat* if for all monomorphisms of modules
(i.e., injective linear maps) `N →ₗ[R] P`, the canonical map `N ⊗ M → P ⊗ M` is injective
(cf. [Katsov2004], [KatsovNam2011]).
To show a module is mono-flat, it suffices to check inclusions of finitely generated
submodules `N` into finitely generated modules `P`, and `P` can be further assumed to lie in
the same universe as `R`.
`M` is flat if `· ⊗ M` preserves finite limits (equivalently, pullbacks, or equalizers).
If `R` is a ring, an `R`-module `M` is flat if and only if it is mono-flat, and to show
a module is flat, it suffices to check inclusions of finitely generated ideals into `R`.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HD>.
Currently, `Module.Flat` is defined to be equivalent to mono-flatness over a semiring.
It is left as a TODO item to introduce the genuine flatness over semirings and rename
the current `Module.Flat` to `Module.MonoFlat`.
## Main declaration
* `Module.Flat`: the predicate asserting that an `R`-module `M` is flat.
## Main theorems
* `Module.Flat.of_retract`: retracts of flat modules are flat
* `Module.Flat.of_linearEquiv`: modules linearly equivalent to a flat modules are flat
* `Module.Flat.directSum`: arbitrary direct sums of flat modules are flat
* `Module.Flat.of_free`: free modules are flat
* `Module.Flat.of_projective`: projective modules are flat
* `Module.Flat.preserves_injective_linearMap`: If `M` is a flat module then tensoring with `M`
preserves injectivity of linear maps. This lemma is fully universally polymorphic in all
arguments, i.e. `R`, `M` and linear maps `N → N'` can all have different universe levels.
* `Module.Flat.iff_rTensor_preserves_injective_linearMap`: a module is flat iff tensoring modules
in the higher universe preserves injectivity .
* `Module.Flat.lTensor_exact`: If `M` is a flat module then tensoring with `M` is an exact
functor. This lemma is fully universally polymorphic in all arguments, i.e.
`R`, `M` and linear maps `N → N' → N''` can all have different universe levels.
* `Module.Flat.iff_lTensor_exact`: a module is flat iff tensoring modules
in the higher universe is an exact functor.
## TODO
* Generalize flatness to noncommutative semirings.
-/
universe v' u v w
open TensorProduct
namespace Module
open Function (Surjective)
open LinearMap Submodule DirectSum
section Semiring
/-! ### Flatness over a semiring -/
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {N P Q : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N] [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P] [AddCommMonoid Q] [Module R Q]
theorem _root_.LinearMap.rTensor_injective_of_fg {f : N →ₗ[R] P}
(h : ∀ (N' : Submodule R N) (P' : Submodule R P),
N'.FG → P'.FG → ∀ h : N' ≤ P'.comap f, Function.Injective ((f.restrict h).rTensor M)) :
Function.Injective (f.rTensor M) := fun x y eq ↦ by
have ⟨N', Nfg, sub⟩ := Submodule.exists_fg_le_subset_range_rTensor_subtype {x, y} (by simp)
| obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := sub (.inl rfl)
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := sub (.inr rfl)
simp_rw [← rTensor_comp_apply, show f ∘ₗ N'.subtype = (N'.map f).subtype ∘ₗ f.submoduleMap N'
from rfl, rTensor_comp_apply] at eq
have ⟨P', Pfg, le, eq⟩ := (Nfg.map _).exists_rTensor_fg_inclusion_eq eq
simp_rw [← rTensor_comp_apply] at eq
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Flat/Basic.lean | 88 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Sophie Morel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.CardEmbedding
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Multilinear.Topology
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous multilinear maps
When `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables, we define its norm `‖f‖` as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
We show that it is indeed a norm, and prove its basic properties.
## Main results
Let `f` be a multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `exists_bound_of_continuous` asserts that, if `f` is continuous, then there exists `C > 0`
with `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
* `continuous_of_bound`, conversely, asserts that this bound implies continuity.
* `mkContinuous` constructs the associated continuous multilinear map.
Let `f` be a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `‖f‖` is its norm, i.e., the smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for
all `m`.
* `le_opNorm f m` asserts the fundamental inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`.
* `norm_image_sub_le f m₁ m₂` gives a control of the difference `f m₁ - f m₂` in terms of
`‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API (and the proofs) of `OperatorNorm.lean`, with the additional complexity
that we should deal with multilinear maps in several variables.
From the mathematical point of view, all the results follow from the results on operator norm in
one variable, by applying them to one variable after the other through currying. However, this
is only well defined when there is an order on the variables (for instance on `Fin n`) although
the final result is independent of the order. While everything could be done following this
approach, it turns out that direct proofs are easier and more efficient.
-/
suppress_compilation
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Topology Uniformity
open Finset Metric Function Filter
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `NontriviallyNormedField`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : Fin (Nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universe u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wG wG'
section continuous_eval
variable {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} {F : Type*}
[NormedField 𝕜] [Finite ι] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
[TopologicalSpace F] [AddCommGroup F] [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F]
instance ContinuousMultilinearMap.instContinuousEval :
ContinuousEval (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (Π i, E i) F where
continuous_eval := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
let _ := IsTopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace F
have := isUniformAddGroup_of_addCommGroup (G := F)
refine (UniformOnFun.continuousOn_eval₂ fun m ↦ ?_).comp_continuous
(isEmbedding_toUniformOnFun.continuous.prodMap continuous_id) fun (f, x) ↦ f.cont.continuousAt
exact ⟨ball m 1, NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_of_isBounded _ isBounded_ball,
ball_mem_nhds _ one_pos⟩
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [Module 𝕜 G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
lemma continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) :
Continuous (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) := by
fun_prop
lemma continuousOn_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {s} :
ContinuousOn (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousOn
lemma continuousAt_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {x} :
ContinuousAt (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousAt
lemma continuousWithinAt_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {s x} :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s x :=
f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousWithinAt
end ContinuousLinearMap
end continuous_eval
section Seminorm
variable {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {E : ι → Type wE} {E₁ : ι → Type wE₁}
{E' : ι' → Type wE'} {G : Type wG} {G' : Type wG'}
[Fintype ι'] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E₁ i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E₁ i)]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
/-!
### Continuity properties of multilinear maps
We relate continuity of multilinear maps to the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, in
both directions. Along the way, we prove useful bounds on the difference `‖f m₁ - f m₂‖`.
-/
namespace MultilinearMap
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map on `E`
and `m` is an element of `∀ i, E i` such that one of the `m i` has norm `0`,
then `f m` has norm `0`.
Note that we cannot drop the continuity assumption because `f (m : Unit → E) = f (m ())`,
where the domain has zero norm and the codomain has a nonzero norm
does not satisfy this condition. -/
lemma norm_map_coord_zero (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (hf : Continuous f)
{m : ∀ i, E i} {i : ι} (hi : ‖m i‖ = 0) : ‖f m‖ = 0 := by
classical
rw [← inseparable_zero_iff_norm] at hi ⊢
have : Inseparable (update m i 0) m := inseparable_pi.2 <|
(forall_update_iff m fun i a ↦ Inseparable a (m i)).2 ⟨hi.symm, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
simpa only [map_update_zero] using this.symm.map hf
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on seminormed spaces
sends vectors with a component of norm zero to vectors of norm zero
and satisfies the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` on a shell `ε i / ‖c i‖ < ‖m i‖ < ε i`
for some positive numbers `ε i` and elements `c i : 𝕜`, `1 < ‖c i‖`,
then it satisfies this inequality for all `m`.
The first assumption is automatically satisfied on normed spaces, see `bound_of_shell` below.
For seminormed spaces, it follows from continuity of `f`, see next lemma,
see `bound_of_shell_of_continuous` below. -/
theorem bound_of_shell_of_norm_map_coord_zero (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
(hf₀ : ∀ {m i}, ‖m i‖ = 0 → ‖f m‖ = 0)
{ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ‖c i‖)
(hf : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ‖c i‖ ≤ ‖m i‖) → (∀ i, ‖m i‖ < ε i) → ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m : ∀ i, E i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
rcases em (∃ i, ‖m i‖ = 0) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | hm)
· rw [hf₀ hi, prod_eq_zero (mem_univ i) hi, mul_zero]
push_neg at hm
choose δ hδ0 hδm_lt hle_δm _ using fun i => rescale_to_shell_semi_normed (hc i) (hε i) (hm i)
have hδ0 : 0 < ∏ i, ‖δ i‖ := prod_pos fun i _ => norm_pos_iff.2 (hδ0 i)
simpa [map_smul_univ, norm_smul, prod_mul_distrib, mul_left_comm C, mul_le_mul_left hδ0] using
hf (fun i => δ i • m i) hle_δm hδm_lt
/-- If a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces satisfies
the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` on a shell `ε i / ‖c i‖ < ‖m i‖ < ε i` for some positive
numbers `ε i` and elements `c i : 𝕜`, `1 < ‖c i‖`, then it satisfies this inequality for all `m`. -/
theorem bound_of_shell_of_continuous (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (hfc : Continuous f)
{ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ‖c i‖)
(hf : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ‖c i‖ ≤ ‖m i‖) → (∀ i, ‖m i‖ < ε i) → ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m : ∀ i, E i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
bound_of_shell_of_norm_map_coord_zero f (norm_map_coord_zero f hfc) hε hc hf m
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces is continuous, then it
satisfies the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, for some `C` which can be chosen to be
positive. -/
theorem exists_bound_of_continuous (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (hf : Continuous f) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· refine ⟨‖f 0‖ + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one, fun m => ?_⟩
obtain rfl : m = 0 := funext (IsEmpty.elim ‹_›)
simp [univ_eq_empty, zero_le_one]
obtain ⟨ε : ℝ, ε0 : 0 < ε, hε : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, ‖m - 0‖ < ε → ‖f m - f 0‖ < 1⟩ :=
NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds.1 (hf.tendsto 0) 1 zero_lt_one
simp only [sub_zero, f.map_zero] at hε
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : 0 < (‖c‖ / ε) ^ Fintype.card ι := pow_pos (div_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hc) ε0) _
refine ⟨_, this, ?_⟩
refine f.bound_of_shell_of_continuous hf (fun _ => ε0) (fun _ => hc) fun m hcm hm => ?_
refine (hε m ((pi_norm_lt_iff ε0).2 hm)).le.trans ?_
rw [← div_le_iff₀' this, one_div, ← inv_pow, inv_div, Fintype.card, ← prod_const]
exact prod_le_prod (fun _ _ => div_nonneg ε0.le (norm_nonneg _)) fun i _ => hcm i
/-- If a multilinear map `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`,
one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂` using the multilinearity.
Here, we give a precise but hard to use version.
See `norm_image_sub_le_of_bound` for a less precise but more usable version.
The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
C * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' [DecidableEq ι] (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
have A :
∀ s : Finset ι,
‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
C * ∑ i ∈ s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
intro s
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s his Hrec
· simp
have I :
‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
have A : (insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁ = Function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₂ i) :=
s.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : s.piecewise m₂ m₁ = Function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₁ i) := by
simp [eq_update_iff, his]
rw [B, A, ← f.map_update_sub]
apply le_trans (H _)
gcongr with j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [h', h, le_refl]
calc
‖f m₁ - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ +
‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ := by
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (C * ∑ i ∈ s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) +
C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
(add_le_add Hrec I)
_ = C * ∑ i ∈ insert i s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
simp [his, add_comm, left_distrib]
convert A univ
simp
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a usable but not very precise version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound'` for a more precise but less usable version. The bound is
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ C * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_bound (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
{C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ := by
classical
have A :
∀ i : ι,
∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) ≤
‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by
intro i
calc
∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) ≤
∏ j : ι, Function.update (fun _ => max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) i ‖m₁ - m₂‖ j := by
apply Finset.prod_le_prod
· intro j _
by_cases h : j = i <;> simp [h, norm_nonneg]
· intro j _
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp only [ite_true, Function.update_self]
exact norm_le_pi_norm (m₁ - m₂) i
· simp [h, - le_sup_iff, - sup_le_iff, sup_le_sup, norm_le_pi_norm]
_ = ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by
rw [prod_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _)]
simp [card_univ_diff]
calc
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' hC H m₁ m₂
_ ≤ C * ∑ _i, ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by gcongr; apply A
_ = C * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ := by
rw [sum_const, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul]
ring
/-- If a multilinear map satisfies an inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, then it is
continuous. -/
theorem continuous_of_bound (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
Continuous f := by
let D := max C 1
have D_pos : 0 ≤ D := le_trans zero_le_one (le_max_right _ _)
replace H (m) : ‖f m‖ ≤ D * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
(H m).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) <| by positivity)
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun m => ?_
refine
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
(D * Fintype.card ι * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1)) fun m' h' => ?_
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
have : max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖ ≤ ‖m‖ + 1 := by
simp [zero_le_one, norm_le_of_mem_closedBall (le_of_lt h')]
calc
‖f m' - f m‖ ≤ D * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ :=
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound D_pos H m' m
_ ≤ D * Fintype.card ι * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ := by gcongr
/-- Constructing a continuous multilinear map from a multilinear map satisfying a boundedness
condition. -/
def mkContinuous (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G :=
{ f with cont := f.continuous_of_bound C H }
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkContinuous (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
⇑(f.mkContinuous C H) = f :=
rfl
/-- Given a multilinear map in `n` variables, if one restricts it to `k` variables putting `z` on
the other coordinates, then the resulting restricted function satisfies an inequality
`‖f.restr v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖^(n-k) * Π ‖v i‖` if the original function satisfies `‖f v‖ ≤ C * Π ‖v i‖`. -/
theorem restr_norm_le {k n : ℕ} (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin n => G) G')
(s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : #s = k) (z : G) {C : ℝ} (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(v : Fin k → G) : ‖f.restr s hk z v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) * ∏ i, ‖v i‖ := by
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc]
convert H _ using 2
simp only [apply_dite norm, Fintype.prod_dite, prod_const ‖z‖, Finset.card_univ,
Fintype.card_of_subtype sᶜ fun _ => mem_compl, card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, hk, mk_coe, ←
(s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm.bijective.prod_comp fun x => ‖v x‖]
convert rfl
end MultilinearMap
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We define the norm `‖f‖` of a continuous multilinear map `f` in finitely many variables as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`. We show that this
defines a normed space structure on `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G`.
-/
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem bound (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.exists_bound_of_continuous f.2
open Real
/-- The operator norm of a continuous multilinear map is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) : ℝ :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ }
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance hasOpNorm' : Norm (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G) G') :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm
theorem norm_def (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
rfl
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
theorem isLeast_opNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
IsLeast {c : ℝ | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖} ‖f‖ := by
refine IsClosed.isLeast_csInf ?_ bounds_nonempty bounds_bddBelow
simp only [Set.setOf_and, Set.setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_Ici.inter (isClosed_iInter fun m ↦
isClosed_le continuous_const (continuous_id.mul continuous_const))
theorem opNorm_nonneg (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
f.isLeast_opNorm.1.2 m
theorem le_mul_prod_of_opNorm_le_of_le {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G}
{m : ∀ i, E i} {C : ℝ} {b : ι → ℝ} (hC : ‖f‖ ≤ C) (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b i) :
‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, b i :=
(f.le_opNorm m).trans <| by gcongr; exacts [f.opNorm_nonneg.trans hC, hm _]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias le_mul_prod_of_le_opNorm_of_le := le_mul_prod_of_opNorm_le_of_le
theorem le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
{m : ∀ i, E i} {b : ι → ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, b i :=
le_mul_prod_of_opNorm_le_of_le le_rfl hm
theorem le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {m b} (hm : ‖m‖ ≤ b) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ Fintype.card ι := by
simpa only [prod_const] using f.le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le fun i => (norm_le_pi_norm m i).trans hm
theorem le_opNorm_mul_pow_of_le {n : ℕ} {Ei : Fin n → Type*} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (Ei i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Ei i)] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) {m : ∀ i, Ei i} {b : ℝ}
(hm : ‖m‖ ≤ b) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ n := by
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using f.le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le hm
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} {C : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ C) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
le_mul_prod_of_opNorm_le_of_le h fun _ ↦ le_rfl
theorem ratio_le_opNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
(‖f m‖ / ∏ i, ‖m i‖) ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_le_mul₀ (by positivity) (opNorm_nonneg _) (f.le_opNorm m)
/-- The image of the unit ball under a continuous multilinear map is bounded. -/
theorem unit_le_opNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {m : ∀ i, E i} (h : ‖m‖ ≤ 1) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
(le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le f h).trans <| by simp
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G}
{M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ M * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
theorem opNorm_le_iff {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
‖f‖ ≤ C ↔ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ le_of_opNorm_le h _, opNorm_le_bound hC⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem opNorm_add_le (f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
opNorm_le_bound (add_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg f) (opNorm_nonneg g)) fun x => by
rw [add_mul]
exact norm_add_le_of_le (le_opNorm _ _) (le_opNorm _ _)
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)‖ = 0 :=
(opNorm_nonneg _).antisymm' <| opNorm_le_bound le_rfl fun m => by simp
section
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' G] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' G]
theorem opNorm_smul_le (c : 𝕜') (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) : ‖c • f‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * ‖f‖ :=
(c • f).opNorm_le_bound (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) fun m ↦ by
rw [smul_apply, norm_smul, mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
variable (𝕜 E G) in
/-- Operator seminorm on the space of continuous multilinear maps, as `Seminorm`.
We use this seminorm
to define a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G`,
but we have to override the projection `UniformSpace`
so that it is definitionally equal to the one coming from the topologies on `E` and `G`. -/
protected def seminorm : Seminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
.ofSMulLE norm opNorm_zero opNorm_add_le fun c f ↦ f.opNorm_smul_le c
private lemma uniformity_eq_seminorm :
𝓤 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) = ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 {f | ‖f.1 - f.2‖ < r} := by
refine (ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminorm 𝕜 E G).uniformity_eq_of_hasBasis
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasBasis_nhds_zero_of_basis Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall)
?_ fun (s, r) ⟨hs, hr⟩ ↦ ?_
· rcases NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 1 with ⟨c, hc⟩
have hc₀ : 0 < ‖c‖ := one_pos.trans hc
simp only [hasBasis_nhds_zero.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
use 1, closedBall 0 ‖c‖, closedBall 0 1
suffices ∀ f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G, (∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ ‖c‖ → ‖f x‖ ≤ 1) → ‖f‖ ≤ 1 by
simpa [NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_closedBall, closedBall_mem_nhds, Set.subset_def, Set.MapsTo]
intro f hf
refine opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) <|
f.1.bound_of_shell_of_continuous f.2 (fun _ ↦ hc₀) (fun _ ↦ hc) fun x hcx hx ↦ ?_
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ 1 := hf _ <| (pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg c)).2 fun i ↦ (hx i).le
_ = ∏ i : ι, 1 := by simp
_ ≤ ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := Finset.prod_le_prod (fun _ _ ↦ zero_le_one) fun i _ ↦ by
simpa only [div_self hc₀.ne'] using hcx i
_ = 1 * ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := (one_mul _).symm
· rcases (NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_iff' _).1 hs with ⟨ε, hε⟩
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt hr (ε ^ Fintype.card ι) with ⟨δ, hδ₀, hδ⟩
refine ⟨δ, hδ₀, fun f hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff] at hf ⊢
replace hf : ‖f‖ ≤ δ := hf.le
replace hx : ‖x‖ ≤ ε := hε x hx
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ε ^ Fintype.card ι := le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le f hx
_ ≤ δ * ε ^ Fintype.card ι := by have := (norm_nonneg x).trans hx; gcongr
_ ≤ r := (mul_comm _ _).trans_le hδ.le
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
.replaceUniformity
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminorm 𝕜 E G).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toPseudoMetricSpace
uniformity_eq_seminorm
/-- Continuous multilinear maps themselves form a seminormed space with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance seminormedAddCommGroup :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminormedAddCommGroup` with non-dependent types to help
typeclass search. -/
instance seminormedAddCommGroup' :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G) G') :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminormedAddCommGroup
instance normedSpace : NormedSpace 𝕜' (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨fun c f => f.opNorm_smul_le c⟩
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance normedSpace' : NormedSpace 𝕜' (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G') G) :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace
@[deprecated norm_neg (since := "2024-11-24")]
theorem opNorm_neg (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := norm_neg f
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`, `nnnorm` version. -/
theorem le_opNNNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact f.le_opNorm m
theorem le_of_opNNNorm_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
{C : ℝ≥0} (h : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C) (m : ∀ i, E i) : ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
(f.le_opNNNorm m).trans <| mul_le_mul' h le_rfl
theorem opNNNorm_le_iff {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} {C : ℝ≥0} :
‖f‖₊ ≤ C ↔ ∀ m, ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ := by
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe]; simp [opNorm_le_iff C.coe_nonneg, NNReal.coe_prod]
theorem isLeast_opNNNorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
IsLeast {C : ℝ≥0 | ∀ m, ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊} ‖f‖₊ := by
simpa only [← opNNNorm_le_iff] using isLeast_Ici
theorem opNNNorm_prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
‖f.prod g‖₊ = max ‖f‖₊ ‖g‖₊ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ ↦ by
simp only [opNNNorm_le_iff, prod_apply, Prod.nnnorm_def, max_le_iff, forall_and]
theorem opNorm_prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
‖f.prod g‖ = max ‖f‖ ‖g‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (opNNNorm_prod f g)
theorem opNNNorm_pi
[∀ i', SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i')] [∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')]
(f : ∀ i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i')) : ‖pi f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ ↦ by simpa [opNNNorm_le_iff, pi_nnnorm_le_iff] using forall_swap
theorem opNorm_pi {ι' : Type v'} [Fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'}
[∀ i', SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i')] [∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')]
(f : ∀ i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i')) :
‖pi f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (opNNNorm_pi f)
section
@[simp]
theorem norm_ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) (f : G →L[𝕜] G') :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
letI : Unique ι := uniqueOfSubsingleton i
simp [norm_def, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_def, (Equiv.funUnique _ _).symm.surjective.forall]
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) (f : G →L[𝕜] G') :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_ofSubsingleton i f
variable (𝕜 G)
/-- Linear isometry between continuous linear maps from `G` to `G'`
and continuous `1`-multilinear maps from `G` to `G'`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def ofSubsingletonₗᵢ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(G →L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι ↦ G) G' :=
{ ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
norm_map' := norm_ofSubsingleton i }
theorem norm_ofSubsingleton_id_le [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G i (.id _ _)‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_ofSubsingleton]
apply ContinuousLinearMap.norm_id_le
theorem nnnorm_ofSubsingleton_id_le [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G i (.id _ _)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_ofSubsingleton_id_le _ _ _
variable {G} (E)
@[simp]
theorem norm_constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : G) : ‖constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine opNorm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [Fintype.prod_empty, mul_one, constOfIsEmpty_apply]
· simpa using (constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x).le_opNorm 0
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : G) : ‖constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_constOfIsEmpty _ _ _
end
section
variable (𝕜 E E' G G')
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.prod` as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def prodL :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G × ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G × G') where
__ := prodEquiv
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
norm_map' f := opNorm_prod f.1 f.2
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def piₗᵢ {ι' : Type v'} [Fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [∀ i', NormedAddCommGroup (E' i')]
[∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')] :
(Π i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i'))
≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (Π i, E' i)) where
toLinearEquiv := piLinearEquiv
norm_map' := opNorm_pi
end
end
section RestrictScalars
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜' 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜' G] [IsScalarTower 𝕜' 𝕜 G]
variable [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜' (E i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower 𝕜' 𝕜 (E i)]
@[simp]
theorem norm_restrictScalars (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖f.restrictScalars 𝕜'‖ = ‖f‖ :=
rfl
variable (𝕜')
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.restrictScalars` as a `LinearIsometry`. -/
def restrictScalarsₗᵢ : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →ₗᵢ[𝕜'] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜' E G where
toFun := restrictScalars 𝕜'
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
norm_map' _ := rfl
end RestrictScalars
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, precise version.
For a less precise but more usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le`. The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
‖f‖ * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le' [DecidableEq ι] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' (norm_nonneg _) f.le_opNorm _ _
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, less precise
version. For a more precise but less usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le'`.
The bound is `‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound (norm_nonneg _) f.le_opNorm _ _
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mkContinuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
theorem MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous C H‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound hC fun m => H m
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mkContinuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
theorem MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous C H‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (le_max_right _ _) fun m ↦ (H m).trans <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) <| by positivity
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset
`s` of `k` of these variables, one gets a new continuous multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying
these variables, and fixing the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by
`f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit
identification between `Fin k` and `s` that we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : (G [×n]→L[𝕜] G' :)) (s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : #s = k) (z : G) :
G [×k]→L[𝕜] G' :=
(f.toMultilinearMap.restr s hk z).mkContinuous (‖f‖ * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k)) fun _ =>
MultilinearMap.restr_norm_le _ _ _ _ f.le_opNorm _
theorem norm_restr {k n : ℕ} (f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : #s = k) (z : G) :
‖f.restr s hk z‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) := by
apply MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le
exact mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
section
variable {A : Type*} [NormedCommRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra_le [Nonempty ι] : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ ≤ 1 := by
refine opNorm_le_bound zero_le_one fun m => ?_
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra_apply, one_mul]
exact norm_prod_le' _ univ_nonempty _
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply opNorm_le_bound <;> simp
· convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A) fun _ => 1
simp [eq_empty_of_isEmpty univ]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra [NormOneClass A] : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = 1 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [norm_mkPiAlgebra_of_empty]
· refine le_antisymm norm_mkPiAlgebra_le ?_
convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A) fun _ => 1
simp
end
section
variable {n : ℕ} {A : Type*} [SeminormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n.succ A‖ ≤ 1 := by
refine opNorm_le_bound zero_le_one fun m => ?_
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin_apply, one_mul, List.ofFn_eq_map,
Fin.prod_univ_def, Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
refine (List.norm_prod_le' ?_).trans_eq ?_
· rw [Ne, List.map_eq_nil_iff, List.finRange_eq_nil]
exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
rw [List.map_map, Function.comp_def]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le_of_pos (hn : 0 < n) :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n A‖ ≤ 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne'
exact norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 0 A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine opNorm_le_bound (norm_nonneg (1 : A)) ?_
simp
· convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 0 A) fun _ => (1 : A)
simp
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n A‖ ≤ max 1 ‖(1 : A)‖ := by
cases n
· exact norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero.le.trans (le_max_right _ _)
· exact (norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le_of_pos (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin [NormOneClass A] :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n A‖ = 1 := by
cases n
· rw [norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero]
simp
· refine le_antisymm norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le ?_
refine le_of_eq_of_le ?_ <|
ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 (Nat.succ _) A) fun _ => 1
simp
end
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_smulRight (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
‖f.smulRight z‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ * ‖z‖₊ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine opNNNorm_le_iff.2 fun m => (nnnorm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [mul_right_comm]
gcongr
exact le_opNNNorm _ _
· obtain hz | hz := eq_zero_or_pos ‖z‖₊
· simp [hz]
rw [← le_div_iff₀ hz, opNNNorm_le_iff]
intro m
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff₀ hz]
refine le_trans ?_ ((f.smulRight z).le_opNNNorm m)
rw [smulRight_apply, nnnorm_smul]
@[simp]
theorem norm_smulRight (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
‖f.smulRight z‖ = ‖f‖ * ‖z‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (nnnorm_smulRight f z)
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiRing (z : G) : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 ι z‖ = ‖z‖ := by
rw [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing, norm_smulRight, norm_mkPiAlgebra, one_mul]
variable (𝕜 E G) in
/-- Continuous bilinear map realizing `(f, z) ↦ f.smulRight z`. -/
def smulRightL : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜 →L[𝕜] G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
{ toFun := fun f ↦
{ toFun := fun z ↦ f.smulRight z
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by ext; simp
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by ext; simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] }
map_add' := fun f g ↦ by ext; simp [add_smul]
map_smul' := fun c f ↦ by ext; simp [smul_smul] }
1 (fun f z ↦ by simp [norm_smulRight])
@[simp] lemma smulRightL_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
smulRightL 𝕜 E G f z = f.smulRight z := rfl
lemma norm_smulRightL_le : ‖smulRightL 𝕜 E G‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le _ zero_le_one _
variable (𝕜 ι G)
/-- Continuous multilinear maps on `𝕜^n` with values in `G` are in bijection with `G`, as such a
continuous multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of
ones. We register this bijection as a linear isometry in
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv`. -/
protected def piFieldEquiv : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => 𝕜) G where
toFun z := ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 ι z
invFun f := f fun _ => 1
map_add' z z' := by
ext m
simp [smul_add]
map_smul' c z := by
ext m
simp [smul_smul, mul_comm]
left_inv z := by simp
right_inv f := f.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
norm_map' := norm_mkPiRing
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le (g : G →L[𝕜] G') (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.compContinuousMultilinearMap f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) fun m ↦
calc
‖g (f m)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) := g.le_opNorm_of_le <| f.le_opNorm _
_ = _ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
variable (𝕜 E G G')
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap` as a bundled continuous bilinear map. -/
def compContinuousMultilinearMapL :
(G →L[𝕜] G') →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
(LinearMap.mk₂ 𝕜 compContinuousMultilinearMap (fun _ _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
(fun f g₁ g₂ => by ext1; apply f.map_add)
(fun c f g => by ext1; simp))
1
fun f g => by rw [one_mul]; exact f.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le g
variable {𝕜 G G'}
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap` as a bundled
continuous linear equiv. -/
def _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G ≃L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
{ compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G G' g.toContinuousLinearMap with
invFun := compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G' G g.symm.toContinuousLinearMap
left_inv := by
intro f
ext1 m
simp [compContinuousMultilinearMapL]
right_inv := by
intro f
ext1 m
simp [compContinuousMultilinearMapL]
continuous_invFun :=
(compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G' G g.symm.toContinuousLinearMap).continuous }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL :=
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_symm (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight E).symm = g.symm.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight E :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_symm :=
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_symm
variable {E}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight E f = (g : G →L[𝕜] G').compContinuousMultilinearMap f :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_apply :=
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply
/-- Flip arguments in `f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'` to get
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G')` -/
@[simps! apply_apply]
def flipMultilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
MultilinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun m =>
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun x => f x m
map_add' := fun x y => by simp only [map_add, ContinuousMultilinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul, RingHom.id_apply] }
(‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) fun x => by
rw [mul_right_comm]
exact (f x).le_of_opNorm_le (f.le_opNorm x) _
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by
ext1
simp only [add_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_add, LinearMap.coe_mk,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, AddHom.coe_mk]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c x => by
ext1
simp only [coe_smul', ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_smul, LinearMap.coe_mk,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, Pi.smul_apply, AddHom.coe_mk] }
‖f‖ fun m => by
dsimp only [MultilinearMap.coe_mk]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
end ContinuousLinearMap
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap (g : G →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe,
LinearIsometry.coe_toContinuousLinearMap, LinearIsometry.norm_map,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_def, Function.comp_apply]
open ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
/-- Given a map `f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'` and an estimate
`H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, construct a continuous linear
map from `G` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'`.
In order to lift, e.g., a map `f : (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`
to a map `(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`,
one can apply this construction to `f.comp ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear`
which is a linear map from `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G` to `MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`. -/
def mkContinuousLinear (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun x => (f x).mkContinuous (C * ‖x‖) <| H x
map_add' := fun x y => by
ext1
simp
map_smul' := fun c x => by
ext1
simp }
(max C 0) fun x => by
simpa using ((f x).mkContinuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq <| by
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg x), zero_mul]
theorem mkContinuousLinear_norm_le' (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖mkContinuousLinear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 := by
dsimp only [mkContinuousLinear]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
theorem mkContinuousLinear_norm_le (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖mkContinuousLinear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mkContinuousLinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
variable [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i)]
/-- Given a map `f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)` and an estimate
`H : ∀ m m', ‖f m m'‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ * ∏ i, ‖m' i‖`, upgrade all `MultilinearMap`s in the type to
`ContinuousMultilinearMap`s. -/
def mkContinuousMultilinear (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G) :=
mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun m => mkContinuous (f m) (C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) <| H m
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by
ext1
simp
map_update_smul' := fun m i c x => by
ext1
simp }
(max C 0) fun m => by
simp only [coe_mk]
refine ((f m).mkContinuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq ?_
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg, zero_mul]
positivity
@[simp]
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_apply (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
⇑(mkContinuousMultilinear f C H m) = f m :=
rfl
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le' (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mkContinuousMultilinear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 := by
dsimp only [mkContinuousMultilinear]
exact mkContinuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mkContinuousMultilinear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
end MultilinearMap
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
theorem norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) : ‖g.compContinuousLinearMap f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖ :=
opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) fun m =>
calc
‖g fun i => f i (m i)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i (m i)‖ := g.le_opNorm _
_ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖ * ‖m i‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (fun _ _ => norm_nonneg _) fun i _ => (f i).le_opNorm (m i))
(norm_nonneg g))
_ = (‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
theorem norm_compContinuous_linearIsometry_le (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖g.compContinuousLinearMap fun i => (f i).toContinuousLinearMap‖ ≤ ‖g‖ := by
refine opNorm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) fun m => ?_
apply (g.le_opNorm _).trans _
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toContinuousLinearMap,
LinearIsometry.norm_map, le_rfl]
theorem norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖g.compContinuousLinearMap fun i => (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)‖ = ‖g‖ := by
apply le_antisymm (g.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometry_le fun i => (f i).toLinearIsometry)
have : g = (g.compContinuousLinearMap fun i => (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)).compContinuousLinearMap
fun i => ((f i).symm : E₁ i →L[𝕜] E i) := by
ext1 m
simp only [compContinuousLinearMap_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_coe'',
LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
apply (g.compContinuousLinearMap fun i =>
(f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)).norm_compContinuous_linearIsometry_le
fun i => (f i).symm.toLinearIsometry
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap` as a bundled continuous linear map.
This implementation fixes `f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i`.
Actually, the map is multilinear in `f`,
see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapContinuousMultilinear`.
For a version fixing `g` and varying `f`, see `compContinuousLinearMapLRight`. -/
def compContinuousLinearMapL (f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun g => g.compContinuousLinearMap f
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
(∏ i, ‖f i‖)
fun _ => (norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMapL_apply (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) : compContinuousLinearMapL f g = g.compContinuousLinearMap f :=
rfl
variable (G) in
theorem norm_compContinuousLinearMapL_le (f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖compContinuousLinearMapL (G := G) f‖ ≤ ∏ i, ‖f i‖ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap` as a bundled continuous linear map.
This implementation fixes `g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G`.
Actually, the map is linear in `g`,
see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapContinuousMultilinear`.
For a version fixing `f` and varying `g`, see `compContinuousLinearMapL`. -/
def compContinuousLinearMapLRight (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i ↦ E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
MultilinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun f => g.compContinuousLinearMap f
map_update_add' := by
intro h f i f₁ f₂
ext x
simp only [compContinuousLinearMap_apply, add_apply]
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) <;>
exact apply_update (fun (i : ι) (f : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) ↦ f (x i)) f i _ _
map_update_smul' := by
intro h f i a f₀
ext x
simp only [compContinuousLinearMap_apply, smul_apply]
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) <;>
exact apply_update (fun (i : ι) (f : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) ↦ f (x i)) f i _ _ }
(‖g‖) (fun f ↦ by simp [norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le])
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMapLRight_apply (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) : compContinuousLinearMapLRight g f = g.compContinuousLinearMap f :=
rfl
variable (E) in
theorem norm_compContinuousLinearMapLRight_le (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G) :
‖compContinuousLinearMapLRight (E := E) g‖ ≤ ‖g‖ :=
MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _
variable (𝕜 E E₁ G)
open Function in
/-- If `f` is a collection of continuous linear maps, then the construction
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap`
sending a continuous multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ·, ..., fₙ ·)`
is continuous-linear in `g` and multilinear in `f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
noncomputable def compContinuousLinearMapMultilinear :
MultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i ↦ E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)
((ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G) →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) where
toFun := compContinuousLinearMapL
map_update_add' f i f₁ f₂ := by
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (f₁ + f₂) j <| x j) =
(g fun j ↦ update f i f₁ j <| x j) + g fun j ↦ update f i f₂ j (x j)
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) <;>
exact apply_update (fun (i : ι) (f : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) ↦ f (x i)) f i _ _
map_update_smul' f i a f₀ := by
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (a • f₀) j <| x j) = a • g fun j ↦ update f i f₀ j (x j)
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) <;>
exact apply_update (fun (i : ι) (f : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) ↦ f (x i)) f i _ _
/-- If `f` is a collection of continuous linear maps, then the construction
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap`
sending a continuous multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ·, ..., fₙ ·)` is continuous-linear in `g` and
continuous-multilinear in `f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
noncomputable def compContinuousLinearMapContinuousMultilinear :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i ↦ E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)
((ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G) →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
MultilinearMap.mkContinuous (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := fun i ↦ E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)
(G := (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G) →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
| (compContinuousLinearMapMultilinear 𝕜 E E₁ G) 1 fun f ↦ by
rw [one_mul]
apply norm_compContinuousLinearMapL_le
variable {𝕜 E E₁}
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap` as a bundled continuous linear equiv,
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,143 | 1,149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
/-!
# Subalgebras and directed Unions of sets
## Main results
* `Subalgebra.coe_iSup_of_directed`: a directed supremum consists of the union of the algebras
* `Subalgebra.iSupLift`: define an algebra homomorphism on a directed supremum of subalgebras by
defining it on each subalgebra, and proving that it agrees on the intersection of subalgebras.
-/
namespace Subalgebra
open Algebra
variable {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable (S : Subalgebra R A)
variable {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {K : ι → Subalgebra R A}
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K) : ↑(iSup K) = ⋃ i, (K i : Set A) :=
let s : Subalgebra R A :=
{ __ := Subsemiring.copy _ _ (Subsemiring.coe_iSup_of_directed dir).symm
algebraMap_mem' := fun _ ↦ Set.mem_iUnion.2
⟨Classical.arbitrary ι, Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _⟩ }
have : iSup K = s := le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ (K i : Set A)) i) (Set.iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ le_iSup K _)
this.symm ▸ rfl
variable (K)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: turn `hT` into an assumption `T ≤ iSup K`.
-- That's what `Set.iUnionLift` needs
-- Porting note: the proofs of `map_{zero,one,add,mul}` got a bit uglier, probably unification trbls
/-- Define an algebra homomorphism on a directed supremum of subalgebras by defining
it on each subalgebra, and proving that it agrees on the intersection of subalgebras. -/
noncomputable def iSupLift (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K) (f : ∀ i, K i →ₐ[R] B)
(hf : ∀ (i j : ι) (h : K i ≤ K j), f i = (f j).comp (inclusion h))
(T : Subalgebra R A) (hT : T = iSup K): ↥T →ₐ[R] B :=
{ toFun := Set.iUnionLift (fun i => ↑(K i)) (fun i x => f i x)
(fun i j x hxi hxj => by
let ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := dir i j
dsimp
rw [hf i k hik, hf j k hjk]
rfl)
(T : Set A) (by rw [hT, coe_iSup_of_directed dir])
map_one' := by apply Set.iUnionLift_const _ (fun _ => 1) <;> simp
map_zero' := by dsimp; apply Set.iUnionLift_const _ (fun _ => 0) <;> simp
map_mul' := by
subst hT; dsimp
apply Set.iUnionLift_binary (coe_iSup_of_directed dir) dir _ (fun _ => (· * ·))
all_goals simp
map_add' := by
subst hT; dsimp
apply Set.iUnionLift_binary (coe_iSup_of_directed dir) dir _ (fun _ => (· + ·))
all_goals simp
commutes' := fun r => by
dsimp
apply Set.iUnionLift_const _ (fun _ => algebraMap R _ r) <;> simp }
@[simp]
theorem iSupLift_inclusion {dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K} {f : ∀ i, K i →ₐ[R] B}
{hf : ∀ (i j : ι) (h : K i ≤ K j), f i = (f j).comp (inclusion h)}
{T : Subalgebra R A} {hT : T = iSup K} {i : ι} (x : K i) (h : K i ≤ T) :
iSupLift K dir f hf T hT (inclusion h x) = f i x := by
dsimp [iSupLift, inclusion]
rw [Set.iUnionLift_inclusion]
@[simp]
theorem iSupLift_comp_inclusion {dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K} {f : ∀ i, K i →ₐ[R] B}
{hf : ∀ (i j : ι) (h : K i ≤ K j), f i = (f j).comp (inclusion h)}
{T : Subalgebra R A} {hT : T = iSup K} {i : ι} (h : K i ≤ T) :
(iSupLift K dir f hf T hT).comp (inclusion h) = f i := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem iSupLift_mk {dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K} {f : ∀ i, K i →ₐ[R] B}
{hf : ∀ (i j : ι) (h : K i ≤ K j), f i = (f j).comp (inclusion h)}
{T : Subalgebra R A} {hT : T = iSup K} {i : ι} (x : K i) (hx : (x : A) ∈ T) :
iSupLift K dir f hf T hT ⟨x, hx⟩ = f i x := by
dsimp [iSupLift, inclusion]
rw [Set.iUnionLift_mk]
theorem iSupLift_of_mem {dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) K} {f : ∀ i, K i →ₐ[R] B}
{hf : ∀ (i j : ι) (h : K i ≤ K j), f i = (f j).comp (inclusion h)}
{T : Subalgebra R A} {hT : T = iSup K} {i : ι} (x : T) (hx : (x : A) ∈ K i) :
iSupLift K dir f hf T hT x = f i ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
| dsimp [iSupLift, inclusion]
rw [Set.iUnionLift_of_mem]
end Subalgebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Directed.lean | 96 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
/-!
# Cardinality of continuum
In this file we define `Cardinal.continuum` (notation: `𝔠`, localized in `Cardinal`) to be `2 ^ ℵ₀`.
We also prove some `simp` lemmas about cardinal arithmetic involving `𝔠`.
## Notation
- `𝔠` : notation for `Cardinal.continuum` in locale `Cardinal`.
-/
namespace Cardinal
universe u v
open Cardinal
/-- Cardinality of the continuum. -/
def continuum : Cardinal.{u} :=
2 ^ ℵ₀
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "𝔠" => Cardinal.continuum
@[simp]
theorem two_power_aleph0 : 2 ^ ℵ₀ = 𝔠 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_continuum : lift.{v} 𝔠 = 𝔠 := by
rw [← two_power_aleph0, lift_two_power, lift_aleph0, two_power_aleph0]
@[simp]
theorem continuum_le_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : 𝔠 ≤ lift.{v} c ↔ 𝔠 ≤ c := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_continuum {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c ≤ 𝔠 ↔ c ≤ 𝔠 := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem continuum_lt_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : 𝔠 < lift.{v} c ↔ 𝔠 < c := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_lt]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt_continuum {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c < 𝔠 ↔ c < 𝔠 := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_lt]
/-!
### Inequalities
-/
| theorem aleph0_lt_continuum : ℵ₀ < 𝔠 :=
cantor ℵ₀
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Continuum.lean | 61 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Simps.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.OfNat
import Batteries.Logic
/-!
# Typeclasses for (semi)groups and monoids
In this file we define typeclasses for algebraic structures with one binary operation.
The classes are named `(Add)?(Comm)?(Semigroup|Monoid|Group)`, where `Add` means that
the class uses additive notation and `Comm` means that the class assumes that the binary
operation is commutative.
The file does not contain any lemmas except for
* axioms of typeclasses restated in the root namespace;
* lemmas required for instances.
For basic lemmas about these classes see `Algebra.Group.Basic`.
We register the following instances:
- `Pow M ℕ`, for monoids `M`, and `Pow G ℤ` for groups `G`;
- `SMul ℕ M` for additive monoids `M`, and `SMul ℤ G` for additive groups `G`.
## Notation
- `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `^` : the usual arithmetic operations; the underlying functions are
`Add.add`, `Neg.neg`/`Sub.sub`, `Mul.mul`, `Div.div`, and `HPow.hPow`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered Function.const_injective
universe u v w
open Function
variable {G : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul G]
/-- `leftMul g` denotes left multiplication by `g` -/
@[to_additive "`leftAdd g` denotes left addition by `g`"]
def leftMul : G → G → G := fun g : G ↦ fun x : G ↦ g * x
/-- `rightMul g` denotes right multiplication by `g` -/
@[to_additive "`rightAdd g` denotes right addition by `g`"]
def rightMul : G → G → G := fun g : G ↦ fun x : G ↦ x * g
attribute [deprecated HMul.hMul "Use (g * ·) instead" (since := "2025-04-08")] leftMul
attribute [deprecated HAdd.hAdd "Use (g + ·) instead" (since := "2025-04-08")] leftAdd
attribute [deprecated HMul.hMul "Use (· * g) instead" (since := "2025-04-08")] rightMul
attribute [deprecated HAdd.hAdd "Use (· + g) instead" (since := "2025-04-08")] rightAdd
/-- A mixin for left cancellative multiplication. -/
class IsLeftCancelMul (G : Type u) [Mul G] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is left cancellative. -/
protected mul_left_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a * b = a * c → b = c
/-- A mixin for right cancellative multiplication. -/
class IsRightCancelMul (G : Type u) [Mul G] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is right cancellative. -/
protected mul_right_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a * b = c * b → a = c
/-- A mixin for cancellative multiplication. -/
class IsCancelMul (G : Type u) [Mul G] : Prop extends IsLeftCancelMul G, IsRightCancelMul G
/-- A mixin for left cancellative addition. -/
class IsLeftCancelAdd (G : Type u) [Add G] : Prop where
/-- Addition is left cancellative. -/
protected add_left_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a + b = a + c → b = c
attribute [to_additive IsLeftCancelAdd] IsLeftCancelMul
/-- A mixin for right cancellative addition. -/
class IsRightCancelAdd (G : Type u) [Add G] : Prop where
/-- Addition is right cancellative. -/
protected add_right_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a + b = c + b → a = c
attribute [to_additive IsRightCancelAdd] IsRightCancelMul
/-- A mixin for cancellative addition. -/
class IsCancelAdd (G : Type u) [Add G] : Prop extends IsLeftCancelAdd G, IsRightCancelAdd G
attribute [to_additive IsCancelAdd] IsCancelMul
section IsLeftCancelMul
variable [IsLeftCancelMul G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_cancel : a * b = a * c → b = c :=
IsLeftCancelMul.mul_left_cancel a b c
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_cancel_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_left_cancel, congrArg _⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_injective (a : G) : Injective (a * ·) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_left_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective a).eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_right (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b ≠ a * c ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_right_injective a).ne_iff
end IsLeftCancelMul
section IsRightCancelMul
variable [IsRightCancelMul G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_cancel : a * b = c * b → a = c :=
IsRightCancelMul.mul_right_cancel a b c
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_cancel_iff : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_right_cancel, congrArg (· * a)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_injective (a : G) : Function.Injective (· * a) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_right_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
(mul_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_left (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a ≠ c * a ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_left_injective a).ne_iff
end IsRightCancelMul
end Mul
/-- A semigroup is a type with an associative `(*)`. -/
@[ext]
class Semigroup (G : Type u) extends Mul G where
/-- Multiplication is associative -/
protected mul_assoc : ∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * (b * c)
/-- An additive semigroup is a type with an associative `(+)`. -/
@[ext]
class AddSemigroup (G : Type u) extends Add G where
/-- Addition is associative -/
protected add_assoc : ∀ a b c : G, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
attribute [to_additive] Semigroup
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_assoc : ∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
Semigroup.mul_assoc
end Semigroup
/-- A commutative additive magma is a type with an addition which commutes. -/
@[ext]
class AddCommMagma (G : Type u) extends Add G where
/-- Addition is commutative in an commutative additive magma. -/
protected add_comm : ∀ a b : G, a + b = b + a
/-- A commutative multiplicative magma is a type with a multiplication which commutes. -/
@[ext]
class CommMagma (G : Type u) extends Mul G where
/-- Multiplication is commutative in a commutative multiplicative magma. -/
protected mul_comm : ∀ a b : G, a * b = b * a
attribute [to_additive] CommMagma
/-- A commutative semigroup is a type with an associative commutative `(*)`. -/
@[ext]
class CommSemigroup (G : Type u) extends Semigroup G, CommMagma G where
/-- A commutative additive semigroup is a type with an associative commutative `(+)`. -/
@[ext]
class AddCommSemigroup (G : Type u) extends AddSemigroup G, AddCommMagma G where
attribute [to_additive] CommSemigroup
section CommMagma
variable [CommMagma G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm : ∀ a b : G, a * b = b * a := CommMagma.mul_comm
/-- Any `CommMagma G` that satisfies `IsRightCancelMul G` also satisfies `IsLeftCancelMul G`. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMagma.IsRightCancelAdd.toIsLeftCancelAdd "Any `AddCommMagma G` that satisfies
`IsRightCancelAdd G` also satisfies `IsLeftCancelAdd G`."]
lemma CommMagma.IsRightCancelMul.toIsLeftCancelMul (G : Type u) [CommMagma G] [IsRightCancelMul G] :
IsLeftCancelMul G :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => mul_right_cancel <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _))⟩
/-- Any `CommMagma G` that satisfies `IsLeftCancelMul G` also satisfies `IsRightCancelMul G`. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMagma.IsLeftCancelAdd.toIsRightCancelAdd "Any `AddCommMagma G` that satisfies
`IsLeftCancelAdd G` also satisfies `IsRightCancelAdd G`."]
lemma CommMagma.IsLeftCancelMul.toIsRightCancelMul (G : Type u) [CommMagma G] [IsLeftCancelMul G] :
IsRightCancelMul G :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => mul_left_cancel <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _))⟩
/-- Any `CommMagma G` that satisfies `IsLeftCancelMul G` also satisfies `IsCancelMul G`. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMagma.IsLeftCancelAdd.toIsCancelAdd "Any `AddCommMagma G` that satisfies
`IsLeftCancelAdd G` also satisfies `IsCancelAdd G`."]
lemma CommMagma.IsLeftCancelMul.toIsCancelMul (G : Type u) [CommMagma G] [IsLeftCancelMul G] :
IsCancelMul G := { CommMagma.IsLeftCancelMul.toIsRightCancelMul G with }
/-- Any `CommMagma G` that satisfies `IsRightCancelMul G` also satisfies `IsCancelMul G`. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMagma.IsRightCancelAdd.toIsCancelAdd "Any `AddCommMagma G` that satisfies
`IsRightCancelAdd G` also satisfies `IsCancelAdd G`."]
lemma CommMagma.IsRightCancelMul.toIsCancelMul (G : Type u) [CommMagma G] [IsRightCancelMul G] :
IsCancelMul G := { CommMagma.IsRightCancelMul.toIsLeftCancelMul G with }
end CommMagma
/-- A `LeftCancelSemigroup` is a semigroup such that `a * b = a * c` implies `b = c`. -/
@[ext]
class LeftCancelSemigroup (G : Type u) extends Semigroup G where
protected mul_left_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a * b = a * c → b = c
library_note "lower cancel priority" /--
We lower the priority of inheriting from cancellative structures.
This attempts to avoid expensive checks involving bundling and unbundling with the `IsDomain` class.
since `IsDomain` already depends on `Semiring`, we can synthesize that one first.
Zulip discussion: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Why.20is.20.60simpNF.60.20complaining.20here.3F
-/
attribute [instance 75] LeftCancelSemigroup.toSemigroup -- See note [lower cancel priority]
/-- An `AddLeftCancelSemigroup` is an additive semigroup such that
`a + b = a + c` implies `b = c`. -/
@[ext]
class AddLeftCancelSemigroup (G : Type u) extends AddSemigroup G where
protected add_left_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a + b = a + c → b = c
attribute [instance 75] AddLeftCancelSemigroup.toAddSemigroup -- See note [lower cancel priority]
attribute [to_additive] LeftCancelSemigroup
/-- Any `LeftCancelSemigroup` satisfies `IsLeftCancelMul`. -/
@[to_additive AddLeftCancelSemigroup.toIsLeftCancelAdd "Any `AddLeftCancelSemigroup` satisfies
`IsLeftCancelAdd`."]
instance (priority := 100) LeftCancelSemigroup.toIsLeftCancelMul (G : Type u)
[LeftCancelSemigroup G] : IsLeftCancelMul G :=
{ mul_left_cancel := LeftCancelSemigroup.mul_left_cancel }
/-- A `RightCancelSemigroup` is a semigroup such that `a * b = c * b` implies `a = c`. -/
@[ext]
class RightCancelSemigroup (G : Type u) extends Semigroup G where
protected mul_right_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a * b = c * b → a = c
attribute [instance 75] RightCancelSemigroup.toSemigroup -- See note [lower cancel priority]
/-- An `AddRightCancelSemigroup` is an additive semigroup such that
`a + b = c + b` implies `a = c`. -/
@[ext]
class AddRightCancelSemigroup (G : Type u) extends AddSemigroup G where
protected add_right_cancel : ∀ a b c : G, a + b = c + b → a = c
attribute [instance 75] AddRightCancelSemigroup.toAddSemigroup -- See note [lower cancel priority]
attribute [to_additive] RightCancelSemigroup
/-- Any `RightCancelSemigroup` satisfies `IsRightCancelMul`. -/
@[to_additive AddRightCancelSemigroup.toIsRightCancelAdd "Any `AddRightCancelSemigroup` satisfies
`IsRightCancelAdd`."]
instance (priority := 100) RightCancelSemigroup.toIsRightCancelMul (G : Type u)
[RightCancelSemigroup G] : IsRightCancelMul G :=
{ mul_right_cancel := RightCancelSemigroup.mul_right_cancel }
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M` with multiplication and a one satisfies
`1 * a = a` and `a * 1 = a` for all `a : M`. -/
class MulOneClass (M : Type u) extends One M, Mul M where
/-- One is a left neutral element for multiplication -/
protected one_mul : ∀ a : M, 1 * a = a
/-- One is a right neutral element for multiplication -/
protected mul_one : ∀ a : M, a * 1 = a
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M` with addition and a zero satisfies
`0 + a = a` and `a + 0 = a` for all `a : M`. -/
class AddZeroClass (M : Type u) extends Zero M, Add M where
/-- Zero is a left neutral element for addition -/
protected zero_add : ∀ a : M, 0 + a = a
/-- Zero is a right neutral element for addition -/
protected add_zero : ∀ a : M, a + 0 = a
attribute [to_additive] MulOneClass
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MulOneClass.ext {M : Type u} : ∀ ⦃m₁ m₂ : MulOneClass M⦄, m₁.mul = m₂.mul → m₁ = m₂ := by
rintro @⟨⟨one₁⟩, ⟨mul₁⟩, one_mul₁, mul_one₁⟩ @⟨⟨one₂⟩, ⟨mul₂⟩, one_mul₂, mul_one₂⟩ ⟨rfl⟩
-- FIXME (See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/1711)
-- congr
suffices one₁ = one₂ by cases this; rfl
exact (one_mul₂ one₁).symm.trans (mul_one₁ one₂)
section MulOneClass
variable {M : Type u} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_mul : ∀ a : M, 1 * a = a :=
MulOneClass.one_mul
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_one : ∀ a : M, a * 1 = a :=
MulOneClass.mul_one
end MulOneClass
section
variable {M : Type u}
/-- The fundamental power operation in a monoid. `npowRec n a = a*a*...*a` n times.
Use instead `a ^ n`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def npowRec [One M] [Mul M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0, _ => 1
| n + 1, a => npowRec n a * a
/-- The fundamental scalar multiplication in an additive monoid. `nsmulRec n a = a+a+...+a` n
times. Use instead `n • a`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def nsmulRec [Zero M] [Add M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0, _ => 0
| n + 1, a => nsmulRec n a + a
attribute [to_additive existing] npowRec
variable [One M] [Semigroup M] (m n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) (ha : 1 * a = a)
include hn ha
@[to_additive] theorem npowRec_add : npowRec (m + n) a = npowRec m a * npowRec n a := by
obtain _ | n := n; · exact (hn rfl).elim
induction n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.zero_add, npowRec, ha]
| succ n ih => rw [← Nat.add_assoc, npowRec, ih n.succ_ne_zero]; simp only [npowRec, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive] theorem npowRec_succ : npowRec (n + 1) a = a * npowRec n a := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, npowRec_add 1 n hn a ha, npowRec, npowRec, ha]
end
library_note "forgetful inheritance"/--
Suppose that one can put two mathematical structures on a type, a rich one `R` and a poor one
`P`, and that one can deduce the poor structure from the rich structure through a map `F` (called a
forgetful functor) (think `R = MetricSpace` and `P = TopologicalSpace`). A possible
implementation would be to have a type class `rich` containing a field `R`, a type class `poor`
containing a field `P`, and an instance from `rich` to `poor`. However, this creates diamond
problems, and a better approach is to let `rich` extend `poor` and have a field saying that
`F R = P`.
To illustrate this, consider the pair `MetricSpace` / `TopologicalSpace`. Consider the topology
on a product of two metric spaces. With the first approach, it could be obtained by going first from
each metric space to its topology, and then taking the product topology. But it could also be
obtained by considering the product metric space (with its sup distance) and then the topology
coming from this distance. These would be the same topology, but not definitionally, which means
that from the point of view of Lean's kernel, there would be two different `TopologicalSpace`
instances on the product. This is not compatible with the way instances are designed and used:
there should be at most one instance of a kind on each type. This approach has created an instance
diamond that does not commute definitionally.
The second approach solves this issue. Now, a metric space contains both a distance, a topology, and
a proof that the topology coincides with the one coming from the distance. When one defines the
product of two metric spaces, one uses the sup distance and the product topology, and one has to
give the proof that the sup distance induces the product topology. Following both sides of the
instance diamond then gives rise (definitionally) to the product topology on the product space.
Another approach would be to have the rich type class take the poor type class as an instance
parameter. It would solve the diamond problem, but it would lead to a blow up of the number
of type classes one would need to declare to work with complicated classes, say a real inner
product space, and would create exponential complexity when working with products of
such complicated spaces, that are avoided by bundling things carefully as above.
Note that this description of this specific case of the product of metric spaces is oversimplified
compared to mathlib, as there is an intermediate typeclass between `MetricSpace` and
`TopologicalSpace` called `UniformSpace`. The above scheme is used at both levels, embedding a
topology in the uniform space structure, and a uniform structure in the metric space structure.
Note also that, when `P` is a proposition, there is no such issue as any two proofs of `P` are
definitionally equivalent in Lean.
To avoid boilerplate, there are some designs that can automatically fill the poor fields when
creating a rich structure if one doesn't want to do something special about them. For instance,
in the definition of metric spaces, default tactics fill the uniform space fields if they are
not given explicitly. One can also have a helper function creating the rich structure from a
structure with fewer fields, where the helper function fills the remaining fields. See for instance
`UniformSpace.ofCore` or `RealInnerProduct.ofCore`.
For more details on this question, called the forgetful inheritance pattern, see [Competing
inheritance paths in dependent type theory: a case study in functional
analysis](https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02463336).
-/
/-!
### Design note on `AddMonoid` and `Monoid`
An `AddMonoid` has a natural `ℕ`-action, defined by `n • a = a + ... + a`, that we want to declare
as an instance as it makes it possible to use the language of linear algebra. However, there are
often other natural `ℕ`-actions. For instance, for any semiring `R`, the space of polynomials
`Polynomial R` has a natural `R`-action defined by multiplication on the coefficients. This means
that `Polynomial ℕ` would have two natural `ℕ`-actions, which are equal but not defeq. The same
goes for linear maps, tensor products, and so on (and even for `ℕ` itself).
To solve this issue, we embed an `ℕ`-action in the definition of an `AddMonoid` (which is by
default equal to the naive action `a + ... + a`, but can be adjusted when needed), and declare
a `SMul ℕ α` instance using this action. See Note [forgetful inheritance] for more
explanations on this pattern.
For example, when we define `Polynomial R`, then we declare the `ℕ`-action to be by multiplication
on each coefficient (using the `ℕ`-action on `R` that comes from the fact that `R` is
an `AddMonoid`). In this way, the two natural `SMul ℕ (Polynomial ℕ)` instances are defeq.
The tactic `to_additive` transfers definitions and results from multiplicative monoids to additive
monoids. To work, it has to map fields to fields. This means that we should also add corresponding
fields to the multiplicative structure `Monoid`, which could solve defeq problems for powers if
needed. These problems do not come up in practice, so most of the time we will not need to adjust
the `npow` field when defining multiplicative objects.
-/
/-- Exponentiation by repeated squaring. -/
@[to_additive "Scalar multiplication by repeated self-addition,
the additive version of exponentiation by repeated squaring."]
def npowBinRec {M : Type*} [One M] [Mul M] (k : ℕ) : M → M :=
npowBinRec.go k 1
where
/-- Auxiliary tail-recursive implementation for `npowBinRec`. -/
@[to_additive nsmulBinRec.go "Auxiliary tail-recursive implementation for `nsmulBinRec`."]
go (k : ℕ) : M → M → M :=
k.binaryRec (fun y _ ↦ y) fun bn _n fn y x ↦ fn (cond bn (y * x) y) (x * x)
/--
A variant of `npowRec` which is a semigroup homomorphisms from `ℕ₊` to `M`.
-/
def npowRec' {M : Type*} [One M] [Mul M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0, _ => 1
| 1, m => m
| k + 2, m => npowRec' (k + 1) m * m
/--
A variant of `nsmulRec` which is a semigroup homomorphisms from `ℕ₊` to `M`.
-/
def nsmulRec' {M : Type*} [Zero M] [Add M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0, _ => 0
| 1, m => m
| k + 2, m => nsmulRec' (k + 1) m + m
attribute [to_additive existing] npowRec'
@[to_additive]
theorem npowRec'_succ {M : Type*} [Mul M] [One M] {k : ℕ} (_ : k ≠ 0) (m : M) :
npowRec' (k + 1) m = npowRec' k m * m :=
match k with
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem npowRec'_two_mul {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] (k : ℕ) (m : M) :
npowRec' (2 * k) m = npowRec' k (m * m) := by
induction k using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind k' ih =>
match k' with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => simp [npowRec']
| k + 2 => simp [npowRec', ← mul_assoc, Nat.mul_add, ← ih]
@[to_additive]
theorem npowRec'_mul_comm {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) (m : M) :
m * npowRec' k m = npowRec' k m * m := by
induction k using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind k' ih =>
match k' with
| 1 => simp [npowRec', mul_assoc]
| k + 2 => simp [npowRec', ← mul_assoc, ih]
@[to_additive]
theorem npowRec_eq {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] (k : ℕ) (m : M) :
npowRec (k + 1) m = 1 * npowRec' (k + 1) m := by
induction k using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind k' ih =>
match k' with
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 =>
rw [npowRec, npowRec'_succ k.succ_ne_zero, ← mul_assoc]
congr
simp [ih]
@[to_additive]
theorem npowBinRec.go_spec {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] (k : ℕ) (m n : M) :
npowBinRec.go (k + 1) m n = m * npowRec' (k + 1) n := by
unfold go
generalize hk : k + 1 = k'
replace hk : k' ≠ 0 := by omega
induction k' using Nat.binaryRecFromOne generalizing n m with
| z₀ => simp at hk
| z₁ => simp [npowRec']
| f b k' k'0 ih =>
rw [Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (Or.inl rfl), ih _ _ k'0]
cases b <;> simp only [Nat.bit, cond_false, cond_true, ← Nat.two_mul, npowRec'_two_mul]
rw [npowRec'_succ (by omega), npowRec'_two_mul, ← npowRec'_two_mul,
← npowRec'_mul_comm (by omega), mul_assoc]
/--
An abbreviation for `npowRec` with an additional typeclass assumption on associativity
so that we can use `@[csimp]` to replace it with an implementation by repeated squaring
in compiled code.
-/
@[to_additive
"An abbreviation for `nsmulRec` with an additional typeclass assumptions on associativity
so that we can use `@[csimp]` to replace it with an implementation by repeated doubling in compiled
code as an automatic parameter."]
abbrev npowRecAuto {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] (k : ℕ) (m : M) : M :=
npowRec k m
/--
An abbreviation for `npowBinRec` with an additional typeclass assumption on associativity
so that we can use it in `@[csimp]` for more performant code generation.
-/
@[to_additive
"An abbreviation for `nsmulBinRec` with an additional typeclass assumption on associativity
so that we can use it in `@[csimp]` for more performant code generation
as an automatic parameter."]
abbrev npowBinRecAuto {M : Type*} [Semigroup M] [One M] (k : ℕ) (m : M) : M :=
npowBinRec k m
@[to_additive (attr := csimp)]
theorem npowRec_eq_npowBinRec : @npowRecAuto = @npowBinRecAuto := by
funext M _ _ k m
rw [npowBinRecAuto, npowRecAuto, npowBinRec]
match k with
| 0 => rw [npowRec, npowBinRec.go, Nat.binaryRec_zero]
| k + 1 => rw [npowBinRec.go_spec, npowRec_eq]
/-- An `AddMonoid` is an `AddSemigroup` with an element `0` such that `0 + a = a + 0 = a`. -/
class AddMonoid (M : Type u) extends AddSemigroup M, AddZeroClass M where
/-- Multiplication by a natural number.
Set this to `nsmulRec` unless `Module` diamonds are possible. -/
protected nsmul : ℕ → M → M
/-- Multiplication by `(0 : ℕ)` gives `0`. -/
protected nsmul_zero : ∀ x, nsmul 0 x = 0 := by intros; rfl
/-- Multiplication by `(n + 1 : ℕ)` behaves as expected. -/
protected nsmul_succ : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), nsmul (n + 1) x = nsmul n x + x := by intros; rfl
attribute [instance 150] AddSemigroup.toAdd
attribute [instance 50] AddZeroClass.toAdd
/-- A `Monoid` is a `Semigroup` with an element `1` such that `1 * a = a * 1 = a`. -/
@[to_additive]
class Monoid (M : Type u) extends Semigroup M, MulOneClass M where
/-- Raising to the power of a natural number. -/
protected npow : ℕ → M → M := npowRecAuto
/-- Raising to the power `(0 : ℕ)` gives `1`. -/
protected npow_zero : ∀ x, npow 0 x = 1 := by intros; rfl
/-- Raising to the power `(n + 1 : ℕ)` behaves as expected. -/
protected npow_succ : ∀ (n : ℕ) (x), npow (n + 1) x = npow n x * x := by intros; rfl
@[default_instance high] instance Monoid.toNatPow {M : Type*} [Monoid M] : Pow M ℕ :=
⟨fun x n ↦ Monoid.npow n x⟩
instance AddMonoid.toNatSMul {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] : SMul ℕ M :=
⟨AddMonoid.nsmul⟩
attribute [to_additive existing toNatSMul] Monoid.toNatPow
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] {a b c : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_eq_smul]
theorem npow_eq_pow (n : ℕ) (x : M) : Monoid.npow n x = x ^ n :=
rfl
@[to_additive] lemma left_inv_eq_right_inv (hba : b * a = 1) (hac : a * c = 1) : b = c := by
rw [← one_mul c, ← hba, mul_assoc, hac, mul_one b]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `zero_smul` proves `zero_nsmul`.
@[to_additive zero_nsmul, simp]
theorem pow_zero (a : M) : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
Monoid.npow_zero _
@[to_additive succ_nsmul]
theorem pow_succ (a : M) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a :=
Monoid.npow_succ n a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) one_nsmul]
lemma pow_one (a : M) : a ^ 1 = a := by rw [pow_succ, pow_zero, one_mul]
@[to_additive succ_nsmul'] lemma pow_succ' (a : M) : ∀ n, a ^ (n + 1) = a * a ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ _ n, pow_succ, pow_succ', mul_assoc]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_pow_mul (a b : M) (n : ℕ) :
(a * b) ^ n * a = a * (b * a) ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [pow_succ', ← ih, Nat.mul_add, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_mul_comm' (a : M) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n * a = a * a ^ n := by rw [← pow_succ, pow_succ']
/-- Note that most of the lemmas about powers of two refer to it as `sq`. -/
@[to_additive two_nsmul] lemma pow_two (a : M) : a ^ 2 = a * a := by rw [pow_succ, pow_one]
-- TODO: Should `alias` automatically transfer `to_additive` statements?
@[to_additive existing two_nsmul] alias sq := pow_two
@[to_additive three'_nsmul]
lemma pow_three' (a : M) : a ^ 3 = a * a * a := by rw [pow_succ, pow_two]
@[to_additive three_nsmul]
lemma pow_three (a : M) : a ^ 3 = a * (a * a) := by rw [pow_succ', pow_two]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order.
@[to_additive nsmul_zero, simp] lemma one_pow : ∀ n, (1 : M) ^ n = 1
| 0 => pow_zero _
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, one_pow, one_mul]
@[to_additive add_nsmul]
lemma pow_add (a : M) (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, a ^ (m + n) = a ^ m * a ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.add_zero, pow_zero, mul_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_add, ← pow_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_comm (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ m * a ^ n = a ^ n * a ^ m := by
rw [← pow_add, ← pow_add, Nat.add_comm]
@[to_additive mul_nsmul] lemma pow_mul (a : M) (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.mul_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, pow_add, pow_succ, pow_mul]
@[to_additive mul_nsmul']
lemma pow_mul' (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, pow_mul]
@[to_additive nsmul_left_comm]
lemma pow_right_comm (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by
rw [← pow_mul, Nat.mul_comm, pow_mul]
end Monoid
/-- An additive commutative monoid is an additive monoid with commutative `(+)`. -/
class AddCommMonoid (M : Type u) extends AddMonoid M, AddCommSemigroup M
/-- A commutative monoid is a monoid with commutative `(*)`. -/
@[to_additive]
class CommMonoid (M : Type u) extends Monoid M, CommSemigroup M
section LeftCancelMonoid
/-- An additive monoid in which addition is left-cancellative.
Main examples are `ℕ` and groups. This is the right typeclass for many sum lemmas, as having a zero
is useful to define the sum over the empty set, so `AddLeftCancelSemigroup` is not enough. -/
class AddLeftCancelMonoid (M : Type u) extends AddMonoid M, AddLeftCancelSemigroup M
attribute [instance 75] AddLeftCancelMonoid.toAddMonoid -- See note [lower cancel priority]
/-- A monoid in which multiplication is left-cancellative. -/
@[to_additive]
class LeftCancelMonoid (M : Type u) extends Monoid M, LeftCancelSemigroup M
attribute [instance 75] LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid -- See note [lower cancel priority]
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
/-- An additive monoid in which addition is right-cancellative.
Main examples are `ℕ` and groups. This is the right typeclass for many sum lemmas, as having a zero
is useful to define the sum over the empty set, so `AddRightCancelSemigroup` is not enough. -/
class AddRightCancelMonoid (M : Type u) extends AddMonoid M, AddRightCancelSemigroup M
attribute [instance 75] AddRightCancelMonoid.toAddMonoid -- See note [lower cancel priority]
/-- A monoid in which multiplication is right-cancellative. -/
@[to_additive]
class RightCancelMonoid (M : Type u) extends Monoid M, RightCancelSemigroup M
attribute [instance 75] RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid -- See note [lower cancel priority]
| end RightCancelMonoid
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Defs.lean | 691 | 692 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
| fun _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 286 | 286 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
| ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 56 | 67 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one]
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x := by
simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
theorem le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc]
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI)
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ I ≤ J := by
simp_rw [span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, mul_right_inj' hx,
exists_eq_right', SetLike.le_def]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} ≤ J * span {x} ↔ I ≤ J := by
simpa only [mul_comm I, mul_comm J] using span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I = span {x} * J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} = J * span {x} ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_left_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective ((span {x} : Ideal R) * ·) := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx).mp
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun I : Ideal R => I * span {x} := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_left_inj hx).mp
theorem eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
theorem span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
(∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧ ∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → Set R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span (I i)) = Ideal.span (∏ i ∈ s, I i) :=
Submodule.prod_span s I
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} :=
Submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
@[simp]
theorem multiset_prod_span_singleton (m : Multiset R) :
(m.map fun x => Ideal.span {x}).prod = Ideal.span ({Multiset.prod m} : Set R) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) fun a m ih => by
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, ih, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (IsCoprime on I)) :
(s.inf fun i => Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_finset_inf, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI, fun h i hi => (Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
theorem iInf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I : ι → R}
(hI : ∀ (i j) (_ : i ≠ j), IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) :
⨅ i, span ({I i} : Set R) = span {∏ i, I i} := by
rw [← Finset.inf_univ_eq_iInf, finset_inf_span_singleton]
rwa [Finset.coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem iInf_span_singleton_natCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{I : ι → ℕ} (hI : Pairwise fun i j => (I i).Coprime (I j)) :
⨅ (i : ι), span {(I i : R)} = span {((∏ i : ι, I i : ℕ) : R)} := by
rw [iInf_span_singleton, Nat.cast_prod]
exact fun i j h ↦ (hI h).cast
theorem sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : Set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩
rw [mem_span_singleton'] at hu hv
rw [← hu.choose_spec, ← hv.choose_spec] at h1
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩
· exact fun ⟨u, v, h1⟩ =>
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj => ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} : s.prod ≤ s.inf := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.inf_zero]
exact le_top
intro a s ih
rw [Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.inf_cons]
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
theorem prod_le_inf {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf fun r ⟨hri, hrj⟩ =>
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h)
mul_one r ▸
hst ▸
(mul_add r s t).symm ▸ Ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) fun i hi => by
rw [eq_top_iff_one] at h; rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h hi ⊢
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, ?_⟩
| rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ J := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 566 | 568 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Topology.IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range :=
IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
| simp +contextual only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 273 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# The `abel` tactic
Evaluate expressions in the language of additive, commutative monoids and groups.
-/
-- TODO: assert_not_exists NonUnitalNonAssociativeSemiring
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid TopologicalSpace PseudoMetricSpace
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
open Lean Elab Meta Tactic Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `abel
initialize registerTraceClass `abel.detail
/--
Tactic for evaluating equations in the language of
*additive*, commutative monoids and groups.
`abel` and its variants work as both tactics and conv tactics.
* `abel1` fails if the target is not an equality that is provable by the axioms of
commutative monoids/groups.
* `abel_nf` rewrites all group expressions into a normal form.
* In tactic mode, `abel_nf at h` can be used to rewrite in a hypothesis.
* `abel_nf (config := cfg)` allows for additional configuration:
* `red`: the reducibility setting (overridden by `!`)
* `zetaDelta`: if true, local let variables can be unfolded (overridden by `!`)
* `recursive`: if true, `abel_nf` will also recurse into atoms
* `abel!`, `abel1!`, `abel_nf!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting to identify atoms.
For example:
```
example [AddCommMonoid α] (a b : α) : a + (b + a) = a + a + b := by abel
example [AddCommGroup α] (a : α) : (3 : ℤ) • a = a + (2 : ℤ) • a := by abel
```
## Future work
* In mathlib 3, `abel` accepted additional optional arguments:
```
syntax "abel" (&" raw" <|> &" term")? (location)? : tactic
```
It is undecided whether these features should be restored eventually.
-/
syntax (name := abel) "abel" "!"? : tactic
/-- The `Context` for a call to `abel`.
Stores a few options for this call, and caches some common subexpressions
such as typeclass instances and `0 : α`.
-/
structure Context where
/-- The type of the ambient additive commutative group or monoid. -/
α : Expr
/-- The universe level for `α`. -/
univ : Level
/-- The expression representing `0 : α`. -/
α0 : Expr
/-- Specify whether we are in an additive commutative group or an additive commutative monoid. -/
isGroup : Bool
/-- The `AddCommGroup α` or `AddCommMonoid α` expression. -/
inst : Expr
/-- Populate a `context` object for evaluating `e`. -/
def mkContext (e : Expr) : MetaM Context := do
let α ← inferType e
let c ← synthInstance (← mkAppM ``AddCommMonoid #[α])
let cg ← synthInstance? (← mkAppM ``AddCommGroup #[α])
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
_ ← isDefEq (.sort (.succ u)) (← inferType α)
let α0 ← Expr.ofNat α 0
match cg with
| some cg => return ⟨α, u, α0, true, cg⟩
| _ => return ⟨α, u, α0, false, c⟩
/-- The monad for `Abel` contains, in addition to the `AtomM` state,
some information about the current type we are working over, so that we can consistently
use group lemmas or monoid lemmas as appropriate. -/
abbrev M := ReaderT Context AtomM
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst : AddWhatever α], _` to the
implicit parameters in the context, and the given list of arguments. -/
def Context.app (c : Context) (n : Name) (inst : Expr) : Array Expr → Expr :=
mkAppN (((@Expr.const n [c.univ]).app c.α).app inst)
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst α], _` to the implicit parameters in the
context, and the given list of arguments.
Compared to `context.app`, this takes the name of the typeclass, rather than an
inferred typeclass instance.
-/
def Context.mkApp (c : Context) (n inst : Name) (l : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
return c.app n (← synthInstance ((Expr.const inst [c.univ]).app c.α)) l
/-- Add the letter "g" to the end of the name, e.g. turning `term` into `termg`.
This is used to choose between declarations taking `AddCommMonoid` and those
taking `AddCommGroup` instances.
-/
def addG : Name → Name
| .str p s => .str p (s ++ "g")
| n => n
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [AddComm{Monoid,Group} α]` to the given list of arguments.
Will use the `AddComm{Monoid,Group}` instance that has been cached in the context.
-/
def iapp (n : Name) (xs : Array Expr) : M Expr := do
let c ← read
return c.app (if c.isGroup then addG n else n) c.inst xs
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative monoid. -/
def term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative group. -/
def termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n : ℤ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- Evaluate a term with coefficient `n`, atom `x` and successor terms `a`. -/
def mkTerm (n x a : Expr) : M Expr := iapp ``term #[n, x, a]
/-- Interpret an integer as a coefficient to a term. -/
def intToExpr (n : ℤ) : M Expr := do
Expr.ofInt (mkConst (if (← read).isGroup then ``Int else ``Nat) []) n
/-- A normal form for `abel`.
Expressions are represented as a list of terms of the form `e = n • x`,
where `n : ℤ` and `x` is an arbitrary element of the additive commutative monoid or group.
We explicitly track the `Expr` forms of `e` and `n`, even though they could be reconstructed,
for efficiency. -/
inductive NormalExpr : Type
| zero (e : Expr) : NormalExpr
| nterm (e : Expr) (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : NormalExpr
deriving Inhabited
/-- Extract the expression from a normal form. -/
def NormalExpr.e : NormalExpr → Expr
| .zero e => e
| .nterm e .. => e
instance : Coe NormalExpr Expr where coe := NormalExpr.e
/-- Construct the normal form representing a single term. -/
def NormalExpr.term' (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : M NormalExpr :=
return .nterm (← mkTerm n.1 x.2 a) n x a
/-- Construct the normal form representing zero. -/
def NormalExpr.zero' : M NormalExpr := return NormalExpr.zero (← read).α0
open NormalExpr
theorem const_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @term α _ n x a = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem const_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @termg α _ n x a = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_const {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@term α _ n x a + k = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_constg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@termg α _ n x a + k = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a') (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n')
(h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') : @term α _ n₁ x a₁ + @term α _ n₂ x a₂ = term n' x a' := by
simp [h₁.symm, h₂.symm, term, add_nsmul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem term_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a')
(h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
@termg α _ n₁ x a₁ + @termg α _ n₂ x a₂ = termg n' x a' := by
simp only [termg, h₁.symm, add_zsmul, h₂.symm]
exact add_add_add_comm (n₁ • x) a₁ (n₂ • x) a₂
theorem zero_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (x a) : @term α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [term, zero_nsmul, one_nsmul]
theorem zero_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (x a) : @termg α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [termg, zero_zsmul]
/--
Interpret the sum of two expressions in `abel`'s normal form.
-/
partial def evalAdd : NormalExpr → NormalExpr → M (NormalExpr × Expr)
| zero _, e₂ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``zero_add #[e₂]
return (e₂, p)
| e₁, zero _ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``add_zero #[e₁]
return (e₁, p)
| he₁@(nterm e₁ n₁ x₁ a₁), he₂@(nterm e₂ n₂ x₂ a₂) => do
if x₁.1 = x₂.1 then
let n' ← Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.eval (← mkAppM ``HAdd.hAdd #[n₁.1, n₂.1])
let (a', h₂) ← evalAdd a₁ a₂
let k := n₁.2 + n₂.2
let p₁ ← iapp ``term_add_term
#[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, n₂.1, a₂, n'.expr, a', ← n'.getProof, h₂]
if k = 0 then do
let p ← mkEqTrans p₁ (← iapp ``zero_term #[x₁.2, a'])
return (a', p)
else return (← term' (n'.expr, k) x₁ a', p₁)
else if x₁.1 < x₂.1 then do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd a₁ he₂
return (← term' n₁ x₁ a', ← iapp ``term_add_const #[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, e₂, a', h])
else do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd he₁ a₂
return (← term' n₂ x₂ a', ← iapp ``const_add_term #[e₁, n₂.1, x₂.2, a₂, a', h])
theorem term_neg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a n' a')
(h₁ : -n = n') (h₂ : -a = a') : -@termg α _ n x a = termg n' x a' := by
simpa [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, termg] using add_comm _ _
| /--
Interpret a negated expression in `abel`'s normal form.
-/
def evalNeg : NormalExpr → M (NormalExpr × Expr)
| Mathlib/Tactic/Abel.lean | 226 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Bounded.Basic
/-!
# Thickened indicators
This file is about thickened indicators of sets in (pseudo e)metric spaces. For a decreasing
sequence of thickening radii tending to 0, the thickened indicators of a closed set form a
decreasing pointwise converging approximation of the indicator function of the set, where the
members of the approximating sequence are nonnegative bounded continuous functions.
## Main definitions
* `thickenedIndicatorAux δ E`: The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` as an
unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
* `thickenedIndicator δ E`: The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` as a bundled
bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function.
## Main results
* For a sequence of thickening radii tending to 0, the `δ`-thickened indicators of a set `E` tend
pointwise to the indicator of `closure E`.
- `thickenedIndicatorAux_tendsto_indicator_closure`: The version is for the
unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions.
- `thickenedIndicator_tendsto_indicator_closure`: The version is for the bundled `ℝ≥0`-valued
bounded continuous functions.
-/
open NNReal ENNReal Topology BoundedContinuousFunction Set Metric EMetric Filter
noncomputable section thickenedIndicator
variable {α : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` is the function that equals `1` on `E`
and `0` outside a `δ`-thickening of `E` and interpolates (continuously) between
these values using `infEdist _ E`.
`thickenedIndicatorAux` is the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function. See `thickenedIndicator`
for the (bundled) bounded continuous function with `ℝ≥0`-values. -/
def thickenedIndicatorAux (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
fun x : α => (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ
theorem continuous_thickenedIndicatorAux {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
Continuous (thickenedIndicatorAux δ E) := by
unfold thickenedIndicatorAux
let f := fun x : α => (⟨1, infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ⟩ : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0∞)
let sub := fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0∞ => (p.1 : ℝ≥0∞) - p.2
rw [show (fun x : α => (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - infEdist x E / ENNReal.ofReal δ) = sub ∘ f by rfl]
apply (@ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub 1).comp
apply (ENNReal.continuous_div_const (ENNReal.ofReal δ) _).comp continuous_infEdist
norm_num [δ_pos]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (x : α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x ≤ 1 := by
apply tsub_le_self (α := ℝ≥0∞)
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} {x : α} :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ _) one_lt_top
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_closure_eq (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ (closure E) = thickenedIndicatorAux δ E := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [thickenedIndicatorAux, infEdist_closure]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_one (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) {x : α} (x_in_E : x ∈ E) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 1 := by
simp [thickenedIndicatorAux, infEdist_zero_of_mem x_in_E, tsub_zero]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_mem : x ∈ closure E) : thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 1 := by
rw [← thickenedIndicatorAux_closure_eq, thickenedIndicatorAux_one δ (closure E) x_mem]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_zero {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_out : x ∉ thickening δ E) : thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x = 0 := by
rw [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at x_out
unfold thickenedIndicatorAux
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
have key := tsub_le_tsub
(@rfl _ (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).le (ENNReal.div_le_div x_out (@rfl _ (ENNReal.ofReal δ : ℝ≥0∞)).le)
rw [ENNReal.div_self (ne_of_gt (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mpr δ_pos)) ofReal_ne_top] at key
simpa [tsub_self] using key
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ₁ E ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ₂ E :=
fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (@rfl ℝ≥0∞ 1).le (ENNReal.div_le_div rfl.le (ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
theorem indicator_le_thickenedIndicatorAux (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
(E.indicator fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E := by
intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ E
· simp only [h, indicator_of_mem, thickenedIndicatorAux_one δ E h, le_refl]
· simp only [h, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_le]
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (subset : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickenedIndicatorAux δ E₁ ≤ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E₂ :=
fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (@rfl ℝ≥0∞ 1).le (ENNReal.div_le_div (infEdist_anti subset) rfl.le)
/-- As the thickening radius δ tends to 0, the δ-thickened indicator of a set E (in α) tends
pointwise (i.e., w.r.t. the product topology on `α → ℝ≥0∞`) to the indicator function of the
closure of E.
This statement is for the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions `thickenedIndicatorAux δ E`, see
`thickenedIndicator_tendsto_indicator_closure` for the version for bundled `ℝ≥0`-valued
bounded continuous functions. -/
theorem thickenedIndicatorAux_tendsto_indicator_closure {δseq : ℕ → ℝ}
(δseq_lim : Tendsto δseq atTop (𝓝 0)) (E : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun n => thickenedIndicatorAux (δseq n) E) atTop
(𝓝 (indicator (closure E) fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞))) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
intro x
by_cases x_mem_closure : x ∈ closure E
· simp_rw [thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure _ E x_mem_closure]
rw [show (indicator (closure E) fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) x = 1 by
simp only [x_mem_closure, indicator_of_mem]]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
· rw [show (closure E).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) x = 0 by
simp only [x_mem_closure, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]]
rcases exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure x_mem_closure with ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds] at δseq_lim
specialize δseq_lim ε ε_pos
simp only [dist_zero_right, Real.norm_eq_abs, eventually_atTop] at δseq_lim
rcases δseq_lim with ⟨N, hN⟩
apply tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := N)
intro n n_large
have key : x ∉ thickening ε E := by simpa only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] using ε_lt.le
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
apply (thickenedIndicatorAux_mono (lt_of_abs_lt (hN n n_large)).le E x).trans
exact (thickenedIndicatorAux_zero ε_pos E key).le
/-- The `δ`-thickened indicator of a set `E` is the function that equals `1` on `E`
and `0` outside a `δ`-thickening of `E` and interpolates (continuously) between
these values using `infEdist _ E`.
`thickenedIndicator` is the (bundled) bounded continuous function with `ℝ≥0`-values.
See `thickenedIndicatorAux` for the unbundled `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function. -/
@[simps]
def thickenedIndicator {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) : α →ᵇ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := fun x : α => (thickenedIndicatorAux δ E x).toNNReal
continuous_toFun := by
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_toNNReal
(continuous_thickenedIndicatorAux δ_pos E)
intro x
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (@thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ δ E x) one_lt_top).ne
map_bounded' := by
use 2
intro x y
rw [NNReal.dist_eq]
apply (abs_sub _ _).trans
rw [NNReal.abs_eq, NNReal.abs_eq, ← one_add_one_eq_two]
have key := @thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one _ _ δ E
apply add_le_add <;>
· norm_cast
exact (toNNReal_le_toNNReal (lt_of_le_of_lt (key _) one_lt_top).ne one_ne_top).mpr (key _)
theorem thickenedIndicator.coeFn_eq_comp {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
⇑(thickenedIndicator δ_pos E) = ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ thickenedIndicatorAux δ E :=
rfl
theorem thickenedIndicator_le_one {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) (x : α) :
thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x ≤ 1 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator.coeFn_eq_comp]
simpa using (toNNReal_le_toNNReal thickenedIndicatorAux_lt_top.ne one_ne_top).mpr
(thickenedIndicatorAux_le_one δ E x)
theorem thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_mem : x ∈ closure E) : thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 1 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_apply, thickenedIndicatorAux_one_of_mem_closure δ E x_mem, toNNReal_one]
lemma one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply' {X : Type _} [PseudoEMetricSpace X]
{δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) {F : Set X} {x : X} (hxF : x ∈ closure F) :
1 ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos F x := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure δ_pos F hxF]
lemma one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply (X : Type _) [PseudoEMetricSpace X]
{δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) {F : Set X} {x : X} (hxF : x ∈ F) :
1 ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos F x :=
one_le_thickenedIndicator_apply' δ_pos (subset_closure hxF)
theorem thickenedIndicator_one {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α} (x_in_E : x ∈ E) :
thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 1 :=
thickenedIndicator_one_of_mem_closure _ _ (subset_closure x_in_E)
theorem thickenedIndicator_zero {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) {x : α}
(x_out : x ∉ thickening δ E) : thickenedIndicator δ_pos E x = 0 := by
rw [thickenedIndicator_apply, thickenedIndicatorAux_zero δ_pos E x_out, toNNReal_zero]
theorem indicator_le_thickenedIndicator {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
(E.indicator fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0)) ≤ thickenedIndicator δ_pos E := by
intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ E
| · simp only [h, indicator_of_mem, thickenedIndicator_one δ_pos E h, le_refl]
· simp only [h, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_le]
theorem thickenedIndicator_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (δ₁_pos : 0 < δ₁) (δ₂_pos : 0 < δ₂) (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/ThickenedIndicator.lean | 199 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
/-!
# The strong law of large numbers
We prove the strong law of large numbers, in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`:
If `X n` is a sequence of independent identically distributed integrable random
variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`.
We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence.
This file also contains the Lᵖ version of the strong law of large numbers provided by
`ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_Lp` which shows `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges in Lᵖ to
`𝔼[X 0]` provided `X n` is independent identically distributed and is Lᵖ.
## Implementation
The main point is to prove the result for real-valued random variables, as the general case
of Banach-space valued random variables follows from this case and approximation by simple
functions. The real version is given in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae_real`.
We follow the proof by Etemadi
[Etemadi, *An elementary proof of the strong law of large numbers*][etemadi_strong_law],
which goes as follows.
It suffices to prove the result for nonnegative `X`, as one can prove the general result by
splitting a general `X` into its positive part and negative part.
Consider `Xₙ` a sequence of nonnegative integrable identically distributed pairwise independent
random variables. Let `Yₙ` be the truncation of `Xₙ` up to `n`. We claim that
* Almost surely, `Xₙ = Yₙ` for all but finitely many indices. Indeed, `∑ ℙ (Xₙ ≠ Yₙ)` is bounded by
`1 + 𝔼[X]` (see `sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le` and `tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top`).
* Let `c > 1`. Along the sequence `n = c ^ k`, then `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ])/n` converges almost
surely to `0`. This follows from a variance control, as
```
∑_k ℙ (|∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ]| > c^k ε)
≤ ∑_k (c^k ε)^{-2} ∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Var[Yᵢ] (by Markov inequality)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) Var[Yᵢ] (as ∑_{c^k > i} 1/(c^k)^2 ≤ C/i^2)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) 𝔼[Yᵢ^2]
≤ 2C 𝔼[X^2] (see `sum_variance_truncation_le`)
```
* As `𝔼[Yᵢ]` converges to `𝔼[X]`, it follows from the two previous items and Cesàro that, along
the sequence `n = c^k`, one has `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ) / n → 𝔼[X]` almost surely.
* To generalize it to all indices, we use the fact that `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ` is nondecreasing and
that, if `c` is close enough to `1`, the gap between `c^k` and `c^(k+1)` is small.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-! ### Prerequisites on truncations -/
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Truncating a real-valued function to the interval `(-A, A]`. -/
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem abs_truncation_le_bound (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |A| := by
simp only [truncation, Set.indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_le_abs h.2 (neg_le.2 h.1.le)
· simp [abs_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem truncation_zero (f : α → ℝ) : truncation f 0 = 0 := by simp [truncation]; rfl
theorem abs_truncation_le_abs_self (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |f x| := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· simp [abs_nonneg]
theorem truncation_eq_self {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} {x : α} (h : |f x| < A) :
truncation f A x = f x := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro H
apply H.elim
simp [(abs_lt.1 h).1, (abs_lt.1 h).2.le]
theorem truncation_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
truncation f A = indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id ∘ f := by
ext x
rcases (h x).lt_or_eq with (hx | hx)
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases h'x : f x ≤ A
· have : -A < f x := by linarith [h x]
simp only [this, true_and]
· simp only [h'x, and_false]
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_self]
theorem truncation_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (A : ℝ) {x : α} (h : 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ truncation f A x :=
Set.indicator_apply_nonneg fun _ => h
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.memLp_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞} : MemLp (truncation f A) p μ :=
MemLp.of_bound hf.truncation |A| (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => abs_truncation_le_bound _ _ _)
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integrable_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} : Integrable (truncation f A) μ := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]; exact hf.memLp_truncation
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} (hA : 0 ≤ A)
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc (-A) A) := measurableSet_Ioc
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· linarith
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) :
∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc 0 A) := measurableSet_Ioc
have M' : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc A 0) := measurableSet_Ioc
rw [truncation_eq_of_nonneg h'f]
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rcases le_or_lt 0 A with (hA | hA)
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hA,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_ge hA.le,
← integral_indicator M']
· simp only [Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le hA.le, zero_pow hn, Set.indicator_empty, integral_zero,
zero_eq_neg]
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂Measure.map f μ, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x :=
(ae_map_iff hf.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ici).2 (Eventually.of_forall h'f)
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
simp only [indicator, Set.mem_Ioc, Pi.zero_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, and_imp]
intro _ h''x
have : x = 0 := by linarith
simp [this, zero_pow hn]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(hA : 0 ≤ A) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral hf hA one_ne_zero
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(h'f : 0 ≤ f) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hf one_ne_zero h'f
theorem integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) {A : ℝ} :
∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
apply integral_mono_of_nonneg
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_) hf (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
· exact truncation_nonneg _ (h'f x)
· calc
truncation f A x ≤ |truncation f A x| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |f x| := abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
_ = f x := abs_of_nonneg (h'f x)
/-- If a function is integrable, then the integral of its truncated versions converges to the
integral of the whole function. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_truncation {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun A => ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => abs (f x)) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun A ↦ hf.aestronglyMeasurable.truncation
· filter_upwards with A
filter_upwards with x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
· exact hf.abs
· filter_upwards with x
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop (abs (f x))] with A hA
exact (truncation_eq_self hA).symm
theorem IdentDistrib.truncation {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ}
{g : β → ℝ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {A : ℝ} :
IdentDistrib (truncation f A) (truncation g A) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc)
end Truncation
section StrongLawAeReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasureSpace Ω] [IsProbabilityMeasure (ℙ : Measure Ω)]
section MomentEstimates
theorem sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) {K : ℕ} {N : ℕ}
(hKN : K ≤ N) :
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := by
let ρ : Measure ℝ := Measure.map X ℙ
haveI : IsProbabilityMeasure ρ := isProbabilityMeasure_map hint.aemeasurable
have A : ∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 :=
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ =
∑ j ∈ range K, ∑ i ∈ Ico j N, ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN)]
intro k _
exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∑ i ∈ range N, ∑ j ∈ range (min (i + 1) K), ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
simp_rw [sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
aesop (add simp Nat.lt_succ_iff)
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, (i + 1) * ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_min]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_left _ _) ?_
apply intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg
· simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
· simp only [zero_le_one, imp_true_iff]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, ∫ x in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), x + 1 ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
have I : (i : ℝ) ≤ (i + 1 : ℕ) := by
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le I, ← integral_const_mul]
apply setIntegral_mono_on
· exact continuous_const.integrableOn_Ioc
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).integrableOn_Ioc
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
· intro x hx
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Set.mem_Ioc] at hx
simp [hx.1.le]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x + 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals fun k _ => ?_]
· norm_cast
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x ∂ρ + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add]
· exact continuous_id.intervalIntegrable _ _
· exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = 𝔼[truncation X N] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 hnonneg]
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ :=
(add_le_add_right (integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg hint hnonneg) _)
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 := by
refine add_le_add le_rfl ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_nonneg _)]
simp only [integral_const, measureReal_restrict_apply', measurableSet_Ioc, Set.univ_inter,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_one]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top prob_le_one
have B : ∀ a b, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc a b} = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc a b, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
intro a b
rw [ofReal_setIntegral_one ρ _,
Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable hint.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ioc]
rfl
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} =
∑ j ∈ range K, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by simp_rw [B]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in (j : ℝ)..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
congr 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN))]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal A
theorem tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) :
(∑' j : ℕ, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)}) < ∞ := by
suffices ∀ K : ℕ, ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) from
(le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum _) tendsto_const_nhds
(Eventually.of_forall this)).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
intro K
have A : Tendsto (fun N : ℕ => ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N}) atTop
(𝓝 (∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)})) := by
refine tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
have : {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (i : ℝ)} = ⋃ N : ℕ, {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (i : ℝ) N} := by
apply Set.Subset.antisymm _ _
· intro ω hω
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, X ω ≤ N := exists_nat_ge (X ω)
exact Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨N, hω, hN⟩
· simp +contextual only [Set.mem_Ioc, Set.mem_Ioi,
Set.iUnion_subset_iff, Set.setOf_subset_setOf, imp_true_iff]
rw [this]
apply tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop
intro m n hmn x hx
exact ⟨hx.1, hx.2.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 hmn)⟩
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto A tendsto_const_nhds
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop K] with N hN
exact sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le hint hnonneg hN
theorem sum_variance_truncation_le {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) (K : ℕ) :
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[truncation X j ^ 2] ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X] := by
set Y := fun n : ℕ => truncation X n
let ρ : Measure ℝ := Measure.map X ℙ
have Y2 : ∀ n, 𝔼[Y n ^ 2] = ∫ x in (0)..n, x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
intro n
change 𝔼[fun x => Y n x ^ 2] = _
rw [moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 two_ne_zero hnonneg]
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[Y j ^ 2] =
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∫ x in (0)..j, x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by simp_rw [Y2]
_ = ∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∑ k ∈ range j, ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
congr 1 with j
congr 1
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals]
· norm_cast
intro k _
exact (continuous_id.pow _).intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∑ k ∈ range K, (∑ j ∈ Ioo k K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹) * ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_mul, sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
aesop (add unsafe lt_trans)
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ range K, 2 / (k + 1 : ℝ) * ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun k _ => ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (sum_Ioo_inv_sq_le _ _) ?_
refine intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg_of_forall ?_ fun u => sq_nonneg _
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ range K, ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), 2 * x ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun k _ => ?_
have Ik : (k : ℝ) ≤ (k + 1 : ℕ) := by simp
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Ik,
intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Ik]
refine setIntegral_mono_on ?_ ?_ measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
· apply Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc
exact continuous_const.mul (continuous_pow 2)
· apply Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc
exact continuous_const.mul continuous_id'
· calc
↑2 / (↑k + ↑1) * x ^ 2 = x / (k + 1) * (2 * x) := by ring
_ ≤ 1 * (2 * x) :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by
convert (div_le_one _).2 hx.2
· norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
linarith only [show (0 : ℝ) ≤ k from Nat.cast_nonneg k])
(mul_nonneg zero_le_two ((Nat.cast_nonneg k).trans hx.1.le)))
_ = 2 * x := by rw [one_mul]
_ = 2 * ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..K, x ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals fun k _ => ?_]
swap; · exact (continuous_const.mul continuous_id').intervalIntegrable _ _
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
norm_cast
_ ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X] := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (by
rw [← integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 hnonneg]
exact integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg hint hnonneg) zero_le_two
end MomentEstimates
/-! Proof of the strong law of large numbers (almost sure version, assuming only
pairwise independence) for nonnegative random variables, following Etemadi's proof. -/
section StrongLawNonneg
variable (X : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (hint : Integrable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise (IndepFun on X)) (hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0))
(hnonneg : ∀ i ω, 0 ≤ X i ω)
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers (with respect to
the truncated expectation) along the sequence `c^n`, for any `c > 1`, up to a given `ε > 0`.
This follows from a variance control. -/
theorem strong_law_aux1 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) : ∀ᵐ ω, ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop,
|∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω - 𝔼[∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i]| <
ε * ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ := by
/- Let `S n = ∑ i ∈ range n, Y i` where `Y i = truncation (X i) i`. We should show that
`|S k - 𝔼[S k]| / k ≤ ε` along the sequence of powers of `c`. For this, we apply Borel-Cantelli:
it suffices to show that the converse probabilities are summable. From Chebyshev inequality,
this will follow from a variance control `∑' Var[S (c^i)] / (c^i)^2 < ∞`. This is checked in
`I2` using pairwise independence to expand the variance of the sum as the sum of the variances,
and then a straightforward but tedious computation (essentially boiling down to the fact that
the sum of `1/(c ^ i)^2` beyond a threshold `j` is comparable to `1/j^2`).
Note that we have written `c^i` in the above proof sketch, but rigorously one should put integer
parts everywhere, making things more painful. We write `u i = ⌊c^i⌋₊` for brevity. -/
have c_pos : 0 < c := zero_lt_one.trans c_one
have hX : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (X i) ℙ := fun i =>
(hident i).symm.aestronglyMeasurable_snd hint.1
have A : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (indicator (Set.Ioc (-i : ℝ) i) id) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc
set Y := fun n : ℕ => truncation (X n) n
set S := fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, Y i with hS
let u : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊
have u_mono : Monotone u := fun i j hij => Nat.floor_mono (pow_right_mono₀ c_one.le hij)
have I1 : ∀ K, ∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X 0] := by
intro K
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] ≤
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[truncation (X 0) j ^ 2] := by
apply sum_le_sum fun j _ => ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (inv_nonneg.2 (sq_nonneg _))
rw [(hident j).truncation.variance_eq]
exact variance_le_expectation_sq (hX 0).truncation
_ ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X 0] := sum_variance_truncation_le hint (hnonneg 0) K
let C := c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * (2 * 𝔼[X 0])
have I2 : ∀ N, ∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[S (u i)] ≤ C := by
intro N
calc
∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[S (u i)] =
∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∑ j ∈ range (u i), Var[Y j] := by
congr 1 with i
congr 1
rw [hS, IndepFun.variance_sum]
· intro j _
exact (hident j).aestronglyMeasurable_fst.memLp_truncation
· intro k _ l _ hkl
exact (hindep hkl).comp (A k).measurable (A l).measurable
_ = ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), (∑ i ∈ range N with j < u i, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹) * Var[Y j] := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_mul, sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [mem_sigma, mem_range, filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter, and_imp,
Sigma.forall]
exact fun a b haN hb ↦ ⟨hb.trans_le <| u_mono <| Nat.le_pred_of_lt haN, haN, hb⟩
all_goals simp
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 / ↑j ^ 2 * Var[Y j] := by
apply sum_le_sum fun j hj => ?_
rcases eq_zero_or_pos j with (rfl | hj)
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, zero_pow, Ne, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, div_zero, zero_mul]
simp only [Y, Nat.cast_zero, truncation_zero, variance_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (variance_nonneg _ _)
convert sum_div_nat_floor_pow_sq_le_div_sq N (Nat.cast_pos.2 hj) c_one using 2
· simp only [u, Nat.cast_lt]
· simp only [Y, S, u, C, one_div]
_ = c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * (2 * 𝔼[X 0]) := by
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (I1 _)
apply mul_nonneg (pow_nonneg c_pos.le _)
exact pow_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (sub_nonneg.2 c_one.le)) _
have I3 : ∀ N, ∑ i ∈ range N, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|} ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ε⁻¹ ^ 2 * C) := by
intro N
calc
∑ i ∈ range N, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|} ≤
∑ i ∈ range N, ENNReal.ofReal (Var[S (u i)] / (u i * ε) ^ 2) := by
refine sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
apply meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq
· exact memLp_finset_sum' _ fun j _ => (hident j).aestronglyMeasurable_fst.memLp_truncation
· apply mul_pos (Nat.cast_pos.2 _) εpos
refine zero_lt_one.trans_le ?_
apply Nat.le_floor
rw [Nat.cast_one]
apply one_le_pow₀ c_one.le
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ i ∈ range N, Var[S (u i)] / (u i * ε) ^ 2) := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg fun i _ => ?_]
exact div_nonneg (variance_nonneg _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε⁻¹ ^ 2 * C) := by
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
-- Porting note: do most of the rewrites under `conv` so as not to expand `variance`
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, i]
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_comm _ ε⁻¹, mul_pow, mul_assoc]
rw [← mul_sum]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (sq_nonneg _)
conv_lhs => enter [2, i]; rw [inv_pow]
exact I2 N
have I4 : (∑' i, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|}) < ∞ :=
(le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' (ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum _) tendsto_const_nhds I3).trans_lt
ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
filter_upwards [ae_eventually_not_mem I4.ne] with ω hω
simp_rw [S, not_le, mul_comm, sum_apply] at hω
convert hω; simp only [Y, S, u, C, sum_apply]
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers
(with respect to the truncated expectation) along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from `strong_law_aux1` by varying `ε`. -/
theorem strong_law_aux2 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω -
𝔼[∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i]) =o[atTop] fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
obtain ⟨v, -, v_pos, v_lim⟩ :
∃ v : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti v ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < v n) ∧ Tendsto v atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have := fun i => strong_law_aux1 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one (v_pos i)
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with ω hω
apply Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε εpos => ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, v i < ε := ((tendsto_order.1 v_lim).2 ε εpos).exists
filter_upwards [hω i] with n hn
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_abs, Nat.abs_cast]
exact hn.le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hi.le (Nat.cast_nonneg _))
include hint hident in
/-- The expectation of the truncated version of `Xᵢ` behaves asymptotically like the whole
expectation. This follows from convergence and Cesàro averaging. -/
theorem strong_law_aux3 :
(fun n => 𝔼[∑ i ∈ range n, truncation (X i) i] - n * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop] ((↑) : ℕ → ℝ) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun i => 𝔼[truncation (X i) i]) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
convert (tendsto_integral_truncation hint).comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop using 1
ext i
exact (hident i).truncation.integral_eq
convert Asymptotics.isLittleO_sum_range_of_tendsto_zero (tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff.2 A) using 1
ext1 n
simp only [sum_sub_distrib, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, sum_apply, sub_left_inj]
rw [integral_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_]
exact ((hident i).symm.integrable_snd hint).1.integrable_truncation
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers
(with respect to the original expectation) along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from the version from the truncated expectation, and the
fact that the truncated and the original expectations have the same asymptotic behavior. -/
theorem strong_law_aux4 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω - ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop]
fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
filter_upwards [strong_law_aux2 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one] with ω hω
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_nat_floor_atTop.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt c_one)
convert hω.add ((strong_law_aux3 X hint hident).comp_tendsto A) using 1
ext1 n
simp
include hint hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncated and non-truncated versions of `Xᵢ` have the same asymptotic behavior, as they
almost surely coincide at all but finitely many steps. This follows from a probability computation
and Borel-Cantelli. -/
theorem strong_law_aux5 :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, truncation (X i) i ω - ∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) =o[atTop]
fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ) := by
have A : (∑' j : ℕ, ℙ {ω | X j ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)}) < ∞ := by
convert tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top hint (hnonneg 0) using 2
ext1 j
exact (hident j).measure_mem_eq measurableSet_Ioi
have B : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => truncation (X n) n ω - X n ω) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
filter_upwards [ae_eventually_not_mem A.ne] with ω hω
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [hω, Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with n hn npos
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact (sub_self _).symm
· have : -(n : ℝ) < X n ω := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (hnonneg n ω)
simpa only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Nat.cast_pos] using npos
simp only [this, true_and, not_le] at h
exact (hn h).elim
filter_upwards [B] with ω hω
convert isLittleO_sum_range_of_tendsto_zero hω using 1
ext n
rw [sum_sub_distrib]
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- `Xᵢ` satisfies the strong law of large numbers along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from the version for the truncated `Xᵢ`, and the fact that
`Xᵢ` and its truncated version have the same asymptotic behavior. -/
theorem strong_law_aux6 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, X i ω) / ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
have H : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ℝ) < ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ := by
intro n
refine zero_lt_one.trans_le ?_
simp only [Nat.one_le_cast, Nat.one_le_floor_iff, one_le_pow₀ c_one.le]
filter_upwards [strong_law_aux4 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one,
strong_law_aux5 X hint hident hnonneg] with ω hω h'ω
rw [← tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff, ← Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff ℝ]
have L : (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, X i ω - ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop] fun n =>
(⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_nat_floor_atTop.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt c_one)
convert hω.sub (h'ω.comp_tendsto A) using 1
ext1 n
simp only [Function.comp_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left]
convert L.mul_isBigO (isBigO_refl (fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop) using 1 <;>
(ext1 n; field_simp [(H n).ne'])
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- `Xᵢ` satisfies the strong law of large numbers along all integers. This follows from the
corresponding fact along the sequences `c^n`, and the fact that any integer can be sandwiched
between `c^n` and `c^(n+1)` with comparably small error if `c` is close enough to `1`
(which is formalized in `tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_tendsto_div_floor_pow`). -/
theorem strong_law_aux7 :
∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
obtain ⟨c, -, cone, clim⟩ :
∃ c : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti c ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 1 < c n) ∧ Tendsto c atTop (𝓝 1) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (1 : ℝ)
have : ∀ k, ∀ᵐ ω,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range ⌊c k ^ n⌋₊, X i ω) / ⌊c k ^ n⌋₊) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) :=
fun k => strong_law_aux6 X hint hindep hident hnonneg (cone k)
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with ω hω
apply tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_tendsto_div_floor_pow _ _ _ c cone clim _
· intro m n hmn
exact sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hmn) fun i _ _ => hnonneg i ω
· exact hω
end StrongLawNonneg
/-- **Strong law of large numbers**, almost sure version: if `X n` is a sequence of independent
identically distributed integrable real-valued random variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n`
converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`. We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only
requires pairwise independence. Superseded by `strong_law_ae`, which works for random variables
taking values in any Banach space. -/
theorem strong_law_ae_real {Ω : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
(X : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ)
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
let mΩ : MeasureSpace Ω := ⟨μ⟩
-- first get rid of the trivial case where the space is not a probability space
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ ω, X 0 ω = 0
· have I : ∀ᵐ ω, ∀ i, X i ω = 0 := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
intro i
exact (hident i).symm.ae_snd (p := fun x ↦ x = 0) measurableSet_eq h
filter_upwards [I] with ω hω
simpa [hω] using (integral_eq_zero_of_ae h).symm
have : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
hint.isProbabilityMeasure_of_indepFun (X 0) (X 1) h (hindep zero_ne_one)
-- then consider separately the positive and the negative part, and apply the result
-- for nonnegative functions to them.
let pos : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => max x 0
let neg : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => max (-x) 0
have posm : Measurable pos := measurable_id'.max measurable_const
have negm : Measurable neg := measurable_id'.neg.max measurable_const
have A : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, (pos ∘ X i) ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[pos ∘ X 0]) :=
strong_law_aux7 _ hint.pos_part (fun i j hij => (hindep hij).comp posm posm)
(fun i => (hident i).comp posm) fun i ω => le_max_right _ _
have B : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, (neg ∘ X i) ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[neg ∘ X 0]) :=
strong_law_aux7 _ hint.neg_part (fun i j hij => (hindep hij).comp negm negm)
(fun i => (hident i).comp negm) fun i ω => le_max_right _ _
filter_upwards [A, B] with ω hωpos hωneg
convert hωpos.sub hωneg using 2
· simp only [pos, neg, ← sub_div, ← sum_sub_distrib, max_zero_sub_max_neg_zero_eq_self,
Function.comp_apply]
· simp only [pos, neg, ← integral_sub hint.pos_part hint.neg_part,
max_zero_sub_max_neg_zero_eq_self, Function.comp_apply, mΩ]
end StrongLawAeReal
section StrongLawVectorSpace
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E]
open Set TopologicalSpace
/-- Preliminary lemma for the strong law of large numbers for vector-valued random variables:
the composition of the random variables with a simple function satisfies the strong law of large
numbers. -/
lemma strong_law_ae_simpleFunc_comp (X : ℕ → Ω → E) (h' : Measurable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) (φ : SimpleFunc E E) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, φ (X i ω))) atTop (𝓝 μ[φ ∘ (X 0)]) := by
-- this follows from the one-dimensional version when `φ` takes a single value, and is then
-- extended to the general case by linearity.
classical
refine SimpleFunc.induction (motive := fun ψ ↦ ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, ψ (X i ω))) atTop (𝓝 μ[ψ ∘ (X 0)])) ?_ ?_ φ
· intro c s hs
simp only [SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator, Function.comp_apply]
let F : E → ℝ := indicator s 1
have F_meas : Measurable F := (measurable_indicator_const_iff 1).2 hs
let Y : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := fun n ↦ F ∘ (X n)
have : ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y i ω)
atTop (𝓝 μ[Y 0]) := by
simp only [Function.const_one, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
apply strong_law_ae_real
· exact SimpleFunc.integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
((SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const _ (1 : ℝ))
(SimpleFunc.const _ (0 : ℝ))).comp (X 0) h')
· exact fun i j hij ↦ IndepFun.comp (hindep hij) F_meas F_meas
· exact fun i ↦ (hident i).comp F_meas
filter_upwards [this] with ω hω
have I : indicator s (Function.const E c) = (fun x ↦ (indicator s (1 : E → ℝ) x) • c) := by
ext
rw [← indicator_smul_const_apply]
congr! 1
ext
simp
simp only [I, integral_smul_const]
convert Tendsto.smul_const hω c using 1
simp [F, Y, ← sum_smul, smul_smul]
· rintro φ ψ - hφ hψ
filter_upwards [hφ, hψ] with ω hωφ hωψ
convert hωφ.add hωψ using 1
· simp [sum_add_distrib]
· congr 1
rw [← integral_add]
· rfl
· exact (φ.comp (X 0) h').integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
· exact (ψ.comp (X 0) h').integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
variable [BorelSpace E]
/-- Preliminary lemma for the strong law of large numbers for vector-valued random variables,
assuming measurability in addition to integrability. This is weakened to ae measurability in
the full version `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`. -/
lemma strong_law_ae_of_measurable
(X : ℕ → Ω → E) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ) (h' : StronglyMeasurable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
/- Choose a simple function `φ` such that `φ (X 0)` approximates well enough `X 0` -- this is
possible as `X 0` is strongly measurable. Then `φ (X n)` approximates well `X n`.
Then the strong law for `φ (X n)` implies the strong law for `X n`, up to a small
error controlled by `n⁻¹ ∑_{i=0}^{n-1} ‖X i - φ (X i)‖`. This one is also controlled thanks
to the one-dimensional law of large numbers: it converges ae to `𝔼[‖X 0 - φ (X 0)‖]`, which
is arbitrarily small for well chosen `φ`. -/
let s : Set E := Set.range (X 0) ∪ {0}
have zero_s : 0 ∈ s := by simp [s]
have : SeparableSpace s := h'.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
have : Nonempty s := ⟨0, zero_s⟩
-- sequence of approximating simple functions.
let φ : ℕ → SimpleFunc E E :=
SimpleFunc.nearestPt (fun k => Nat.casesOn k 0 ((↑) ∘ denseSeq s) : ℕ → E)
let Y : ℕ → ℕ → Ω → E := fun k i ↦ (φ k) ∘ (X i)
-- strong law for `φ (X n)`
have A : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ k,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y k i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[Y k 0]) :=
ae_all_iff.2 (fun k ↦ strong_law_ae_simpleFunc_comp X h'.measurable hindep hident (φ k))
-- strong law for the error `‖X i - φ (X i)‖`
have B : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ k, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (∑ i ∈ range n, ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) / n)
atTop (𝓝 μ[(fun ω ↦ ‖(X 0 - Y k 0) ω‖)]) := by
apply ae_all_iff.2 (fun k ↦ ?_)
let G : ℕ → E → ℝ := fun k x ↦ ‖x - φ k x‖
have G_meas : ∀ k, Measurable (G k) :=
fun k ↦ (measurable_id.sub_stronglyMeasurable (φ k).stronglyMeasurable).norm
have I : ∀ k i, (fun ω ↦ ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) = (G k) ∘ (X i) := fun k i ↦ rfl
apply strong_law_ae_real (fun i ω ↦ ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖)
· exact (hint.sub ((φ k).comp (X 0) h'.measurable).integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure).norm
· unfold Function.onFun
simp_rw [I]
intro i j hij
exact (hindep hij).comp (G_meas k) (G_meas k)
· intro i
simp_rw [I]
apply (hident i).comp (G_meas k)
-- check that, when both convergences above hold, then the strong law is satisfied
filter_upwards [A, B] with ω hω h'ω
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero, tendsto_order]
refine ⟨fun c hc ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ hc.trans_le (norm_nonneg _)), ?_⟩
-- start with some positive `ε` (the desired precision), and fix `δ` with `3 δ < ε`.
intro ε (εpos : 0 < ε)
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ δ + δ + δ < ε := ⟨ε/4, by positivity, by linarith⟩
-- choose `k` large enough so that `φₖ (X 0)` approximates well enough `X 0`, up to the
-- precision `δ`.
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k, ∫ ω, ‖(X 0 - Y k 0) ω‖ ∂μ < δ := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, norm_sub_rev (X 0 _)]
exact ((tendsto_order.1 (tendsto_integral_norm_approxOn_sub h'.measurable hint)).2 δ
δpos).exists
have : ‖μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0]‖ < δ := by
rw [norm_sub_rev, ← integral_sub hint]
· exact (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans_lt hk
· exact ((φ k).comp (X 0) h'.measurable).integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
-- consider `n` large enough for which the above convergences have taken place within `δ`.
have I : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (∑ i ∈ range n, ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) / n < δ :=
(tendsto_order.1 (h'ω k)).2 δ hk
have J : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ‖(n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y k i ω) - μ[Y k 0]‖ < δ := by
specialize hω k
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero] at hω
exact (tendsto_order.1 hω).2 δ δpos
filter_upwards [I, J] with n hn h'n
-- at such an `n`, the strong law is realized up to `ε`.
calc
‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, X i ω - μ[X 0]‖
= ‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (X i ω - Y k i ω) +
((n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y k i ω - μ[Y k 0]) + (μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0])‖ := by
congr
simp only [Function.comp_apply, sum_sub_distrib, smul_sub]
abel
_ ≤ ‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (X i ω - Y k i ω)‖ +
‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y k i ω - μ[Y k 0]‖ + ‖μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0]‖ :=
norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, ‖X i ω - Y k i ω‖) / n + δ + δ := by
gcongr
simp only [Function.comp_apply, norm_smul, norm_inv, RCLike.norm_natCast,
div_eq_inv_mul, inv_pos, Nat.cast_pos, inv_lt_zero]
gcongr
exact norm_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ δ + δ + δ := by
gcongr
exact hn.le
_ < ε := hδ
omit [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] in
/-- **Strong law of large numbers**, almost sure version: if `X n` is a sequence of independent
identically distributed integrable random variables taking values in a Banach space,
then `n⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ range n, X i` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`. We give here the strong
version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence. -/
theorem strong_law_ae (X : ℕ → Ω → E) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ)
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
| (hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
-- First exclude the trivial case where the space is not a probability space
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, X 0 ω = 0
· have I : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, X i ω = 0 := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
intro i
exact (hident i).symm.ae_snd (p := fun x ↦ x = 0) measurableSet_eq h
filter_upwards [I] with ω hω
simpa [hω] using (integral_eq_zero_of_ae h).symm
have : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
hint.isProbabilityMeasure_of_indepFun (X 0) (X 1) h (hindep zero_ne_one)
-- we reduce to the case of strongly measurable random variables, by using `Y i` which is strongly
-- measurable and ae equal to `X i`.
have A : ∀ i, Integrable (X i) μ := fun i ↦ (hident i).integrable_iff.2 hint
let Y : ℕ → Ω → E := fun i ↦ (A i).1.mk (X i)
have B : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ n, X n ω = Y n ω :=
ae_all_iff.2 (fun i ↦ AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (A i).1)
have Yint : Integrable (Y 0) μ := Integrable.congr hint (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (A 0).1)
have C : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[Y 0]) := by
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 797 | 817 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Bound
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Equitabilise
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Uniform
/-!
# Chunk of the increment partition for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
In the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma, we need to partition each part of a starting partition
to increase the energy. This file defines those partitions of parts and shows that they locally
increase the energy.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.chunk`: The partition of a part of the starting partition.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_uniform`: `chunk` does not locally decrease the edge
density between uniform parts too much.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_not_uniform`: `chunk` locally increases the edge density
between non-uniform parts.
## TODO
Once ported to mathlib4, this file will be a great golfing ground for Heather's new tactic
`gcongr`.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finpartition Finset Fintype Rel Nat
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
(hP : P.IsEquipartition) (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : ℝ) {U : Finset α}
(hU : U ∈ P.parts) (V : Finset α)
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
/-!
### Definitions
We define `chunk`, the partition of a part, and `star`, the sets of parts of `chunk` that are
contained in the corresponding witness of non-uniformity.
-/
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.increment` which partitions `U`. -/
noncomputable def chunk : Finpartition U :=
if hUcard : #U = m * 4 ^ #P.parts + (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts) then
(atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₁ hUcard
else (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₂ hP hU hUcard
-- `hP` and `hU` are used to get that `U` has size
-- `m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a or m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a + 1`
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.chunk` which is contained in the witness of non-uniformity
of `U` and `V`. -/
noncomputable def star (V : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V}
/-!
### Density estimates
We estimate the density between parts of `chunk`.
-/
theorem biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness :
(star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V :=
biUnion_subset_iff_forall_subset.2 fun _ hA => (mem_filter.1 hA).2
variable {hP G ε hU V} {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α}
theorem star_subset_chunk : star hP G ε hU V ⊆ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts :=
filter_subset _ _
private theorem card_nonuniformWitness_sdiff_biUnion_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts) (hUV : U ≠ V)
(h₂ : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) :
#(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) ≤ 2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * m := by
have hX : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∈ P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U :=
nonuniformWitness_mem_nonuniformWitnesses h₂ hV hUV
have q : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆
{B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts |
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty}.biUnion
fun B => B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id := by
intro x hx
rw [← biUnion_filter_atomise hX (G.nonuniformWitness_subset h₂), star, mem_sdiff,
mem_biUnion] at hx
simp only [not_exists, mem_biUnion, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_filter,
not_and, mem_sdiff, id, mem_sdiff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB₁, hB₂⟩, hx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨B, hB₁, hB₂, fun A hA AB => hx A hA <| AB.trans hB₁.2.1⟩
apply (card_le_card q).trans (card_biUnion_le.trans _)
trans ∑ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts with
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty, m
· suffices ∀ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts,
#(B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id) ≤ m by
exact sum_le_sum fun B hB => this B <| filter_subset _ _ hB
intro B hB
unfold chunk
split_ifs with h₁
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₁ h₁) hB
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₂ hP hU h₁) hB
rw [sum_const]
refine mul_le_mul_right' ?_ _
have t := card_filter_atomise_le_two_pow (s := U) hX
refine t.trans (pow_right_mono₀ (by norm_num) <| tsub_le_tsub_right ?_ _)
exact card_image_le.trans (card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _)
private theorem one_sub_eps_mul_card_nonuniformWitness_le_card_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts)
(hUV : U ≠ V) (hunif : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) (hPε : ↑100 ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5)
(hε₁ : ε ≤ 1) :
(1 - ε / 10) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) ≤ #((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) := by
have hP₁ : 0 < #P.parts := Finset.card_pos.2 ⟨_, hU⟩
have : (↑2 ^ #P.parts : ℝ) * m / (#U * ε) ≤ ε / 10 := by
rw [← div_div, div_le_iff₀']
swap
· sz_positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ (pow_pos zero_lt_two #P.parts)
calc
↑2 ^ #P.parts * ((↑2 ^ #P.parts * m : ℝ) / #U) =
((2 : ℝ) * 2) ^ #P.parts * m / #U := by
rw [mul_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
_ = ↑4 ^ #P.parts * m / #U := by norm_num
_ ≤ 1 := div_le_one_of_le₀ (pow_mul_m_le_card_part hP hU) (cast_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ↑2 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 2 / 10 := by
refine (one_le_sq_iff₀ <| by positivity).1 ?_
rw [div_pow, mul_pow, pow_right_comm, ← pow_mul ε,
one_le_div (sq_pos_of_ne_zero <| by norm_num)]
calc
(↑10 ^ 2) = 100 := by norm_num
_ ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5 := hPε
_ ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 4 :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by sz_positivity) hε₁ <| le_succ _)
(by positivity))
_ = (↑2 ^ 2) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ (2 * 2) := by norm_num
_ = ↑2 ^ #P.parts * (ε * (ε / 10)) := by rw [mul_div_assoc, sq, mul_div_assoc]
calc
(↑1 - ε / 10) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) ≤
(↑1 - ↑2 ^ #P.parts * m / (#U * ε)) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (sub_le_sub_left this _) (cast_nonneg _)
_ = #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) -
↑2 ^ #P.parts * m / (#U * ε) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) := by
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
_ ≤ #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) - ↑2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * m := by
refine sub_le_sub_left ?_ _
have : (2 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts = ↑2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * 2 := by
rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_iff.2 hP₁)]
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, this, mul_right_comm _ (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc, le_div_iff₀]
· refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (by positivity)
exact (G.le_card_nonuniformWitness hunif).trans
(le_mul_of_one_le_left (cast_nonneg _) one_le_two)
have := Finset.card_pos.mpr (P.nonempty_of_mem_parts hU)
sz_positivity
_ ≤ #((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) := by
rw [sub_le_comm, ←
cast_sub (card_le_card <| biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness hP G ε hU V), ←
card_sdiff (biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness hP G ε hU V)]
exact mod_cast card_nonuniformWitness_sdiff_biUnion_star hV hUV hunif
/-! ### `chunk` -/
theorem card_chunk (hm : m ≠ 0) : #(chunk hP G ε hU).parts = 4 ^ #P.parts := by
unfold chunk
split_ifs
· rw [card_parts_equitabilise _ _ hm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact le_of_lt a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card
· rw [card_parts_equitabilise _ _ hm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card]
theorem card_eq_of_mem_parts_chunk (hs : s ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) :
#s = m ∨ #s = m + 1 := by
unfold chunk at hs
split_ifs at hs <;> exact card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise hs
theorem m_le_card_of_mem_chunk_parts (hs : s ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) : m ≤ #s :=
(card_eq_of_mem_parts_chunk hs).elim ge_of_eq fun i => by simp [i]
theorem card_le_m_add_one_of_mem_chunk_parts (hs : s ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) : #s ≤ m + 1 :=
(card_eq_of_mem_parts_chunk hs).elim (fun i => by simp [i]) fun i => i.le
theorem card_biUnion_star_le_m_add_one_card_star_mul :
(#((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) : ℝ) ≤ #(star hP G ε hU V) * (m + 1) :=
mod_cast card_biUnion_le_card_mul _ _ _ fun _ hs =>
card_le_m_add_one_of_mem_chunk_parts <| star_subset_chunk hs
private theorem le_sum_card_subset_chunk_parts (h𝒜 : 𝒜 ⊆ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) :
(#𝒜 : ℝ) * #s * (m / (m + 1)) ≤ #(𝒜.sup id) := by
rw [mul_div_assoc', div_le_iff₀ coe_m_add_one_pos, mul_right_comm]
refine mul_le_mul ?_ ?_ (cast_nonneg _) (cast_nonneg _)
· rw [← (ofSubset _ h𝒜 rfl).sum_card_parts, ofSubset_parts, ← cast_mul, cast_le]
exact card_nsmul_le_sum _ _ _ fun x hx => m_le_card_of_mem_chunk_parts <| h𝒜 hx
· exact mod_cast card_le_m_add_one_of_mem_chunk_parts (h𝒜 hs)
private theorem sum_card_subset_chunk_parts_le (m_pos : (0 : ℝ) < m)
(h𝒜 : 𝒜 ⊆ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) (hs : s ∈ 𝒜) :
(#(𝒜.sup id) : ℝ) ≤ #𝒜 * #s * ((m + 1) / m) := by
rw [sup_eq_biUnion, mul_div_assoc', le_div_iff₀ m_pos, mul_right_comm]
refine mul_le_mul ?_ ?_ (cast_nonneg _) (by positivity)
· norm_cast
refine card_biUnion_le_card_mul _ _ _ fun x hx => ?_
apply card_le_m_add_one_of_mem_chunk_parts (h𝒜 hx)
· exact mod_cast m_le_card_of_mem_chunk_parts (h𝒜 hs)
private theorem one_sub_le_m_div_m_add_one_sq [Nonempty α]
(hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) (hPε : ↑100 ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) :
↑1 - ε ^ 5 / ↑50 ≤ (m / (m + 1 : ℝ)) ^ 2 := by
have : (m : ℝ) / (m + 1) = 1 - 1 / (m + 1) := by
rw [one_sub_div coe_m_add_one_pos.ne', add_sub_cancel_right]
rw [this, sub_sq, one_pow, mul_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_of_nonneg_right <| sq_nonneg _)
rw [sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← le_div_iff₀' (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num), div_div,
one_div_le coe_m_add_one_pos, one_div_div]
· refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one)
norm_num
apply hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m hPα hPε
| sz_positivity
private theorem m_add_one_div_m_le_one_add [Nonempty α]
(hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) (hPε : ↑100 ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) (hε₁ : ε ≤ 1) :
((m + 1 : ℝ) / m) ^ 2 ≤ ↑1 + ε ^ 5 / 49 := by
have : 0 ≤ ε := by sz_positivity
rw [same_add_div (by sz_positivity)]
calc
_ ≤ (1 + ε ^ 5 / 100) ^ 2 := by
gcongr (1 + ?_) ^ 2
rw [← one_div_div (100 : ℝ)]
exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le (by sz_positivity) (hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m hPα hPε)
_ = 1 + ε ^ 5 * (50⁻¹ + ε ^ 5 / 10000) := by ring
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Chunk.lean | 226 | 238 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Minchao Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Minchao Wu, Chris Hughes, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Minimum and maximum of lists
## Main definitions
The main definitions are `argmax`, `argmin`, `minimum` and `maximum` for lists.
`argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `a` of `l` that maximises `f a`. If there are `a b` such that
`f a = f b`, it returns whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list.
`argmax f [] = none`
`minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]`
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section ArgAux
variable (r : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel r] {l : List α} {o : Option α} {a : α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `argmax` and `argmin`. -/
def argAux (a : Option α) (b : α) : Option α :=
Option.casesOn a (some b) fun c => if r b c then some b else some c
@[simp]
theorem foldl_argAux_eq_none : l.foldl (argAux r) o = none ↔ l = [] ∧ o = none :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp) fun tl hd => by
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, argAux, foldl_nil, append_eq_nil_iff, and_false, false_and,
iff_false]
cases foldl (argAux r) o tl
· simp
· simp only [false_iff, not_and]
split_ifs <;> simp
private theorem foldl_argAux_mem (l) : ∀ a m : α, m ∈ foldl (argAux r) (some a) l → m ∈ a :: l :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [eq_comm])
(by
intro tl hd ih a m
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux]
cases hf : foldl (argAux r) (some a) tl
· simp +contextual
· dsimp only
split_ifs
· simp +contextual
· -- `finish [ih _ _ hf]` closes this goal
simp only [List.mem_cons] at ih
rcases ih _ _ hf with rfl | H
· simp +contextual only [Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
find?, eq_comm, mem_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, true_or, implies_true]
· simp +contextual [@eq_comm _ _ m, H])
@[simp]
theorem argAux_self (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (a : α) : argAux r (some a) a = a :=
if_neg <| hr₀ _
theorem not_of_mem_foldl_argAux (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (hr₁ : Transitive r) :
∀ {a m : α} {o : Option α}, a ∈ l → m ∈ foldl (argAux r) o l → ¬r a m := by
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with tl a ih
· simp
intro b m o hb ho
rw [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux] at ho
rcases hf : foldl (argAux r) o tl with - | c
· rw [hf] at ho
rw [foldl_argAux_eq_none] at hf
simp_all [hf.1, hf.2, hr₀ _]
rw [hf, Option.mem_def] at ho
dsimp only at ho
split_ifs at ho with hac <;> rcases mem_append.1 hb with h | h <;>
injection ho with ho <;> subst ho
· exact fun hba => ih h hf (hr₁ hba hac)
· simp_all [hr₀ _]
· exact ih h hf
· simp_all
end ArgAux
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] [DecidableLT β] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {a m : α}
/-- `argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is maximal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f a < f b`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmax f [] = none`. -/
def argmax (f : α → β) (l : List α) : Option α :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f c < f b) none
/-- `argmin f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is minimal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f b < f a`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmin f [] = none`. -/
def argmin (f : α → β) (l : List α) :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f b < f c) none
@[simp]
theorem argmax_nil (f : α → β) : argmax f [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmin_nil (f : α → β) : argmin f [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmax_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmax f [a] = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmin_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmin f [a] = a :=
rfl
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → ¬f m < f a :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun _ _ z hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f z) hyz hxy)
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → ¬f a < f m :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun x _ _ hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f x) hxy hyz)
theorem argmax_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some a else some c := by
rw [argmax, argmax]; simp [argAux]
theorem argmin_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some a else some c :=
@argmax_concat _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmax_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → m ∈ l
| [], m => by simp
| hd :: tl, m => by simpa [argmax, argAux] using foldl_argAux_mem _ tl hd m
theorem argmin_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → m ∈ l :=
@argmax_mem _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem argmax_eq_none : l.argmax f = none ↔ l = [] := by simp [argmax]
@[simp]
theorem argmin_eq_none : l.argmin f = none ↔ l = [] :=
@argmax_eq_none _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {a m : α}
theorem le_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → f a ≤ f m := fun ha hm =>
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_of_mem_argmax ha hm
theorem le_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → f m ≤ f a :=
@le_of_mem_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmax_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some c else some a :=
List.reverseRecOn l rfl fun hd tl ih => by
rw [← cons_append, argmax_concat, ih, argmax_concat]
rcases h : argmax f hd with - | m
· simp [h]
dsimp
rw [← apply_ite, ← apply_ite]
dsimp
split_ifs <;> try rfl
· exact absurd (lt_trans ‹f a < f m› ‹_›) ‹_›
· cases (‹f a < f tl›.lt_or_lt _).elim ‹_› ‹_›
theorem argmin_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some c else some a :=
@argmax_cons α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem index_of_argmax :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a
| [], m, _, _, _, _ => by simp
| hd :: tl, m, hm, a, ha, ham => by
simp only [idxOf_cons, argmax_cons, Option.mem_def] at hm ⊢
cases h : argmax f tl
· rw [h] at hm
simp_all
rw [h] at hm
dsimp only at hm
simp only [cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
obtain ha | ha := ha <;> split_ifs at hm <;> injection hm with hm <;> subst hm
· cases not_le_of_lt ‹_› ‹_›
· rw [if_pos rfl]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· exact Nat.succ_le_succ (index_of_argmax h (by assumption) ham)
· exact ne_of_apply_ne f (lt_of_lt_of_le ‹_› ‹_›).ne
· exact ne_of_apply_ne _ ‹f hd < f _›.ne
· rw [if_pos rfl]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem index_of_argmin :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
@index_of_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem mem_argmax_iff :
m ∈ argmax f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
⟨fun hm => ⟨argmax_mem hm, fun _ ha => le_of_mem_argmax ha hm, fun _ => index_of_argmax hm⟩,
by
rintro ⟨hml, ham, hma⟩
rcases harg : argmax f l with - | n
· simp_all
· have :=
_root_.le_antisymm (hma n (argmax_mem harg) (le_of_mem_argmax hml harg))
(index_of_argmax harg hml (ham _ (argmax_mem harg)))
rw [(idxOf_inj hml (argmax_mem harg)).1 this, Option.mem_def]⟩
theorem argmax_eq_some_iff :
argmax f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
mem_argmax_iff
theorem mem_argmin_iff :
m ∈ argmin f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
@mem_argmax_iff _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmin_eq_some_iff :
argmin f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
mem_argmin_iff
end LinearOrder
section MaximumMinimum
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] {l : List α} {a m : α}
/-- `maximum l` returns a `WithBot α`, the largest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊥` for
`[]` -/
def maximum (l : List α) : WithBot α :=
argmax id l
/-- `minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]` -/
def minimum (l : List α) : WithTop α :=
argmin id l
@[simp]
theorem maximum_nil : maximum ([] : List α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem minimum_nil : minimum ([] : List α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem maximum_singleton (a : α) : maximum [a] = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem minimum_singleton (a : α) : minimum [a] = a :=
rfl
theorem maximum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (maximum l : WithTop α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmax_mem
theorem minimum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (minimum l : WithBot α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmin_mem
@[simp]
theorem maximum_eq_bot {l : List α} : l.maximum = ⊥ ↔ l = [] :=
argmax_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem minimum_eq_top {l : List α} : l.minimum = ⊤ ↔ l = [] :=
argmin_eq_none
theorem not_maximum_lt_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → ¬m < a :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmax
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias not_lt_maximum_of_mem := not_maximum_lt_of_mem
theorem not_lt_minimum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → ¬a < m :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias minimum_not_lt_of_mem := not_lt_minimum_of_mem
theorem not_maximum_lt_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬maximum l < (a : WithBot α) := by
cases h : l.maximum <;> simp_all [not_maximum_lt_of_mem ha]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias not_lt_maximum_of_mem' := not_maximum_lt_of_mem'
theorem not_lt_minimum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬(a : WithTop α) < minimum l := by
cases h : l.minimum <;> simp_all [not_lt_minimum_of_mem ha]
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {l : List α} {a m : α}
theorem maximum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (l ++ [a]) = max (maximum l) a := by
simp only [maximum, argmax_concat, id]
cases argmax id l
· exact (max_eq_right bot_le).symm
· simp [WithBot.some_eq_coe, max_def_lt, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
theorem le_maximum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → a ≤ m :=
le_of_mem_argmax
theorem minimum_le_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → m ≤ a :=
le_of_mem_argmin
theorem le_maximum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : (a : WithBot α) ≤ maximum l :=
le_of_not_lt <| not_maximum_lt_of_mem' ha
theorem minimum_le_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : minimum l ≤ (a : WithTop α) :=
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_minimum_of_mem' ha
theorem minimum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (l ++ [a]) = min (minimum l) a :=
@maximum_concat αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem maximum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (a :: l) = max ↑a (maximum l) :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [@max_eq_left (WithBot α) _ _ _ bot_le]) fun tl hd ih => by
rw [← cons_append, maximum_concat, ih, maximum_concat, max_assoc]
theorem minimum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (a :: l) = min ↑a (minimum l) :=
@maximum_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma maximum_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : (l₁ ++ l₂).maximum = max l₁.maximum l₂.maximum := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => rw [maximum_cons, cons_append, maximum_cons, ih, ← max_assoc]
lemma minimum_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : (l₁ ++ l₂).minimum = min l₁.minimum l₂.minimum :=
@maximum_append αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem maximum_le_of_forall_le {b : WithBot α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ≤ b) : l.maximum ≤ b := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
| simp only [maximum_cons, max_le_iff]
exact ⟨h a (by simp), ih fun a w => h a (mem_cons.mpr (Or.inr w))⟩
theorem le_minimum_of_forall_le {b : WithTop α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, b ≤ a) : b ≤ l.minimum := by
induction l with
| Mathlib/Data/List/MinMax.lean | 353 | 357 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Range
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.MulChar.Basic
/-!
# Quadratic characters on ℤ/nℤ
This file defines some quadratic characters on the rings ℤ/4ℤ and ℤ/8ℤ.
We set them up to be of type `MulChar (ZMod n) ℤ`, where `n` is `4` or `8`.
## Tags
quadratic character, zmod
-/
/-!
### Quadratic characters mod 4 and 8
We define the primitive quadratic characters `χ₄`on `ZMod 4`
and `χ₈`, `χ₈'` on `ZMod 8`.
-/
namespace ZMod
section QuadCharModP
/-- Define the nontrivial quadratic character on `ZMod 4`, `χ₄`.
It corresponds to the extension `ℚ(√-1)/ℚ`. -/
@[simps]
def χ₄ : MulChar (ZMod 4) ℤ where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 | 2 => 0
| 1 => 1
| 3 => -1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by decide
map_nonunit' := by decide
/-- `χ₄` takes values in `{0, 1, -1}` -/
theorem isQuadratic_χ₄ : χ₄.IsQuadratic := by
unfold MulChar.IsQuadratic
decide
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℕ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_mod_four (n : ℕ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℕ) := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_mod n 4]
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℤ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_mod_four (n : ℤ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℤ) := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_mod n 4, Nat.cast_ofNat]
/-- An explicit description of `χ₄` on integers / naturals -/
theorem χ₄_int_eq_if_mod_four (n : ℤ) :
χ₄ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 4 = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
have help : ∀ m : ℤ, 0 ≤ m → m < 4 → χ₄ m = if m % 2 = 0 then 0 else if m = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
decide
rw [← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n (by omega : (2 : ℤ) ∣ 4), ← ZMod.intCast_mod n 4]
exact help (n % 4) (Int.emod_nonneg n (by omega)) (Int.emod_lt_abs n (by omega))
theorem χ₄_nat_eq_if_mod_four (n : ℕ) :
χ₄ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 4 = 1 then 1 else -1 :=
mod_cast χ₄_int_eq_if_mod_four n
/-- Alternative description of `χ₄ n` for odd `n : ℕ` in terms of powers of `-1` -/
theorem χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : χ₄ n = (-1) ^ (n / 2) := by
rw [χ₄_nat_eq_if_mod_four]
simp only [hn, Nat.one_ne_zero, if_false]
nth_rewrite 3 [← Nat.div_add_mod n 4]
nth_rewrite 3 [show 4 = 2 * 2 by omega]
rw [mul_assoc, add_comm, Nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ zero_lt_two, pow_add, pow_mul,
neg_one_sq, one_pow, mul_one]
have help : ∀ m : ℕ, m < 4 → m % 2 = 1 → ite (m = 1) (1 : ℤ) (-1) = (-1) ^ (m / 2) := by decide
exact help _ (Nat.mod_lt n (by omega)) <| (Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n (by omega : 2 ∣ 4)).trans hn
/-- If `n % 4 = 1`, then `χ₄ n = 1`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_one_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 1) : χ₄ n = 1 := by
rw [χ₄_nat_mod_four, hn]
rfl
/-- If `n % 4 = 3`, then `χ₄ n = -1`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_three_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 3) : χ₄ n = -1 := by
rw [χ₄_nat_mod_four, hn]
rfl
| /-- If `n % 4 = 1`, then `χ₄ n = 1`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_one_mod_four {n : ℤ} (hn : n % 4 = 1) : χ₄ n = 1 := by
rw [χ₄_int_mod_four, hn]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/ZModChar.lean | 94 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Support
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Jacobian
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
/-!
# Links between an integral and its "improper" version
In its current state, mathlib only knows how to talk about definite ("proper") integrals,
in the sense that it treats integrals over `[x, +∞)` the same as it treats integrals over
`[y, z]`. For example, the integral over `[1, +∞)` is **not** defined to be the limit of
the integral over `[1, x]` as `x` tends to `+∞`, which is known as an **improper integral**.
Indeed, the "proper" definition is stronger than the "improper" one. The usual counterexample
is `x ↦ sin(x)/x`, which has an improper integral over `[1, +∞)` but no definite integral.
Although definite integrals have better properties, they are hardly usable when it comes to
computing integrals on unbounded sets, which is much easier using limits. Thus, in this file,
we prove various ways of studying the proper integral by studying the improper one.
## Definitions
The main definition of this file is `MeasureTheory.AECover`. It is a rather technical definition
whose sole purpose is generalizing and factoring proofs. Given an index type `ι`, a countably
generated filter `l` over `ι`, and an `ι`-indexed family `φ` of subsets of a measurable space `α`
equipped with a measure `μ`, one should think of a hypothesis `hφ : MeasureTheory.AECover μ l φ` as
a sufficient condition for being able to interpret `∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x
in φ i, f x ∂μ` as `i` tends to `l`.
When using this definition with a measure restricted to a set `s`, which happens fairly often, one
should not try too hard to use a `MeasureTheory.AECover` of subsets of `s`, as it often makes proofs
more complicated than necessary. See for example the proof of
`MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto` where we use `(fun x ↦ oi x)` as a
`MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. `μ.restrict (Iic b)`, instead of using `(fun x ↦ Ioc x b)`.
## Main statements
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is a measurable
`ENNReal`-valued function, then `∫⁻ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, if `f` is measurable and
integrable on each `φ n`, and if `∫ x in φ n, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` tends to some `I : ℝ` as n tends to `l`,
then `f` is integrable
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is measurable
and integrable (globally), then `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `+∞`.
We then specialize these lemmas to various use cases involving intervals, which are frequent
in analysis. In particular,
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` is a version of FTC-2 on the interval
`(a, +∞)`, giving the formula `∫ x in (a, +∞), g' x = l - g a` if `g'` is integrable and
`g` tends to `l` at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg` gives the same result assuming that
`g'` is nonnegative instead of integrable. Its automatic integrability in this context is proved
in `MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi` is a version of the change of variables formula
on semi-infinite intervals.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that a function whose
derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` has a limit at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that an integrable function
whose derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` tends to `0` at `+∞`.
Versions of these results are also given on the intervals `(-∞, a]` and `(-∞, +∞)`, as well as
the corresponding versions of integration by parts.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section AECover
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter ι)
/-- A sequence `φ` of subsets of `α` is a `MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. a measure `μ` and a filter
`l` if almost every point (w.r.t. `μ`) of `α` eventually belongs to `φ n` (w.r.t. `l`), and if
each `φ n` is measurable. This definition is a technical way to avoid duplicating a lot of
proofs. It should be thought of as a sufficient condition for being able to interpret
`∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`.
See for example `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`,
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` and
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
structure AECover (φ : ι → Set α) : Prop where
ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ i in l, x ∈ φ i
protected measurableSet : ∀ i, MeasurableSet <| φ i
variable {μ} {l}
namespace AECover
/-!
## Operations on `AECover`s
-/
/-- Elementwise intersection of two `AECover`s is an `AECover`. -/
theorem inter {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hψ : AECover μ l ψ) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ φ i ∩ ψ i) where
ae_eventually_mem := hψ.1.mp <| hφ.1.mono fun _ ↦ Eventually.and
measurableSet _ := (hφ.2 _).inter (hψ.2 _)
theorem superset {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hsub : ∀ i, φ i ⊆ ψ i)
(hmeas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (ψ i)) : AECover μ l ψ :=
⟨hφ.1.mono fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono fun i hi ↦ hsub i hi, hmeas⟩
theorem mono_ac {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := ⟨hle hφ.1, hφ.2⟩
theorem mono {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := hφ.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
end AECover
section MetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
theorem aecover_ball {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.ball x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
theorem aecover_closedBall {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.closedBall x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isClosed_closedBall.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ici_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
end MetricSpace
| section Preorderα
variable [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α}
theorem aecover_Ici (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) : AECover μ l fun i => Ici (a i) where
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegralEqImproper.lean | 146 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CompTypeclasses
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
/-!
# Semiring, ring etc structures on `R × S`
In this file we define two-binop (`Semiring`, `Ring` etc) structures on `R × S`. We also prove
trivial `simp` lemmas, and define the following operations on `RingHom`s and similarly for
`NonUnitalRingHom`s:
* `fst R S : R × S →+* R`, `snd R S : R × S →+* S`: projections `Prod.fst` and `Prod.snd`
as `RingHom`s;
* `f.prod g : R →+* S × T`: sends `x` to `(f x, g x)`;
* `f.prod_map g : R × S → R' × S'`: `Prod.map f g` as a `RingHom`,
sends `(x, y)` to `(f x, g y)`.
-/
variable {R R' S S' T : Type*}
namespace Prod
/-- Product of two distributive types is distributive. -/
instance instDistrib [Distrib R] [Distrib S] : Distrib (R × S) where
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> exact left_distrib ..
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> exact right_distrib ..
/-- Product of two `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`s is a `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`. -/
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] :
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (Distrib (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (MulZeroClass (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two `NonUnitalSemiring`s is a `NonUnitalSemiring`. -/
instance instNonUnitalSemiring [NonUnitalSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring S] :
NonUnitalSemiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (SemigroupWithZero (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two `NonAssocSemiring`s is a `NonAssocSemiring`. -/
instance instNonAssocSemiring [NonAssocSemiring R] [NonAssocSemiring S] :
NonAssocSemiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (MulZeroOneClass (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (AddMonoidWithOne (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two semirings is a semiring. -/
instance instSemiring [Semiring R] [Semiring S] : Semiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalSemiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (NonAssocSemiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (MonoidWithZero (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two `NonUnitalCommSemiring`s is a `NonUnitalCommSemiring`. -/
instance instNonUnitalCommSemiring [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring S] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalSemiring (R × S)), inferInstanceAs (CommSemigroup (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two commutative semirings is a commutative semiring. -/
instance instCommSemiring [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] : CommSemiring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Semiring (R × S)), inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid (R × S)) with }
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocRing [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing S] :
NonUnitalNonAssocRing (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (R × S)) with }
instance instNonUnitalRing [NonUnitalRing R] [NonUnitalRing S] : NonUnitalRing (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalNonAssocRing (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalSemiring (R × S)) with }
instance instNonAssocRing [NonAssocRing R] [NonAssocRing S] : NonAssocRing (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalNonAssocRing (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (NonAssocSemiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (AddGroupWithOne (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two rings is a ring. -/
instance instRing [Ring R] [Ring S] : Ring (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Semiring (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (R × S)),
inferInstanceAs (AddGroupWithOne (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two `NonUnitalCommRing`s is a `NonUnitalCommRing`. -/
instance instNonUnitalCommRing [NonUnitalCommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing S] :
NonUnitalCommRing (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (NonUnitalRing (R × S)), inferInstanceAs (CommSemigroup (R × S)) with }
/-- Product of two commutative rings is a commutative ring. -/
instance instCommRing [CommRing R] [CommRing S] : CommRing (R × S) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Ring (R × S)), inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid (R × S)) with }
end Prod
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
variable (R S) [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S]
/-- Given non-unital semirings `R`, `S`, the natural projection homomorphism from `R × S` to `R`. -/
def fst : R × S →ₙ+* R :=
{ MulHom.fst R S, AddMonoidHom.fst R S with toFun := Prod.fst }
/-- Given non-unital semirings `R`, `S`, the natural projection homomorphism from `R × S` to `S`. -/
def snd : R × S →ₙ+* S :=
{ MulHom.snd R S, AddMonoidHom.snd R S with toFun := Prod.snd }
variable {R S}
@[simp]
theorem coe_fst : ⇑(fst R S) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_snd : ⇑(snd R S) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
section Prod
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T] (f : R →ₙ+* S) (g : R →ₙ+* T)
/-- Combine two non-unital ring homomorphisms `f : R →ₙ+* S`, `g : R →ₙ+* T` into
`f.prod g : R →ₙ+* S × T` given by `(f.prod g) x = (f x, g x)` -/
protected def prod (f : R →ₙ+* S) (g : R →ₙ+* T) : R →ₙ+* S × T :=
{ MulHom.prod (f : MulHom R S) (g : MulHom R T), AddMonoidHom.prod (f : R →+ S) (g : R →+ T) with
toFun := fun x => (f x, g x) }
@[simp]
theorem prod_apply (x) : f.prod g x = (f x, g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_prod : (fst S T).comp (f.prod g) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_prod : (snd S T).comp (f.prod g) = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem prod_unique (f : R →ₙ+* S × T) : ((fst S T).comp f).prod ((snd S T).comp f) = f :=
ext fun x => by simp only [prod_apply, coe_fst, coe_snd, comp_apply]
end Prod
section prodMap
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R'] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S'] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T]
variable (f : R →ₙ+* R') (g : S →ₙ+* S')
/-- `Prod.map` as a `NonUnitalRingHom`. -/
def prodMap : R × S →ₙ+* R' × S' :=
| (f.comp (fst R S)).prod (g.comp (snd R S))
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Prod.lean | 157 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Constructions
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Bases of topologies. Countability axioms.
A topological basis on a topological space `t` is a collection of sets,
such that all open sets can be generated as unions of these sets, without the need to take
finite intersections of them. This file introduces a framework for dealing with these collections,
and also what more we can say under certain countability conditions on bases,
which are referred to as first- and second-countable.
We also briefly cover the theory of separable spaces, which are those with a countable, dense
subset. If a space is second-countable, and also has a countably generated uniformity filter
(for example, if `t` is a metric space), it will automatically be separable (and indeed, these
conditions are equivalent in this case).
## Main definitions
* `TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis s`: The topological space `t` has basis `s`.
* `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace α`: The topological space `t` has a countable, dense subset.
* `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s`: The set `s` is contained in the closure of a countable set.
* `FirstCountableTopology α`: A topology in which `𝓝 x` is countably generated for
every `x`.
* `SecondCountableTopology α`: A topology which has a topological basis which is
countable.
## Main results
* `TopologicalSpace.FirstCountableTopology.tendsto_subseq`: In a first-countable space,
cluster points are limits of subsequences.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.isOpen_iUnion_countable`: In a second-countable space,
the union of arbitrarily-many open sets is equal to a sub-union of only countably many of these
sets.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.countable_cover_nhds`: Consider `f : α → Set α` with the
property that `f x ∈ 𝓝 x` for all `x`. Then there is some countable set `s` whose image covers
the space.
## Implementation Notes
For our applications we are interested that there exists a countable basis, but we do not need the
concrete basis itself. This allows us to declare these type classes as `Prop` to use them as mixins.
## TODO
More fine grained instances for `FirstCountableTopology`,
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`, and more.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology
noncomputable section
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
/-- A topological basis is one that satisfies the necessary conditions so that
it suffices to take unions of the basis sets to get a topology (without taking
finite intersections as well). -/
structure IsTopologicalBasis (s : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
/-- For every point `x`, the set of `t ∈ s` such that `x ∈ t` is directed downwards. -/
exists_subset_inter : ∀ t₁ ∈ s, ∀ t₂ ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃ ∈ s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂
/-- The sets from `s` cover the whole space. -/
sUnion_eq : ⋃₀ s = univ
/-- The topology is generated by sets from `s`. -/
eq_generateFrom : t = generateFrom s
/-- If a family of sets `s` generates the topology, then intersections of finite
subcollections of `s` form a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : t = generateFrom s) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun f => ⋂₀ f) '' { f : Set (Set α) | f.Finite ∧ f ⊆ s }) := by
subst t; letI := generateFrom s
refine ⟨?_, ?_, le_antisymm (le_generateFrom ?_) <| generateFrom_anti fun t ht => ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b⟩, rfl⟩ x h
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b⟩, sInter_union t₁ t₂⟩, h, Subset.rfl⟩
· rw [sUnion_image, iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff]
exact fun x => ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩, sInter_empty.substr <| mem_univ x⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb⟩, rfl⟩
exact hft.isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ GenerateOpen.basic _ <| htb hs
· rw [← sInter_singleton t]
exact ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩, rfl⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom s)
(hsi : FiniteInter s) : IsTopologicalBasis s := by
convert isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis hsg
refine le_antisymm (fun t ht ↦ ⟨{t}, by simpa using ht⟩) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g, ⟨hg, hgs⟩, rfl⟩
lift g to Finset (Set α) using hg
exact hsi.finiteInter_mem g hgs
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_inter {r : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom r)
(hsi : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ r → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ r → s ∩ t ∈ r) : IsTopologicalBasis (insert univ r) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter (by simpa using hsg) (FiniteInter.mk₂ hsi)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_hasBasis_nhds {s : Set (Set α)}
(h_nhds : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t ↦ t ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t) id) : IsTopologicalBasis s where
exists_subset_inter t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx := by
simpa only [and_assoc, (h_nhds x).mem_iff]
using (inter_mem ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₁, hx.1⟩) ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₂, hx.2⟩))
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x ↦ (h_nhds x).ex_mem
eq_generateFrom := ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
simpa only [nhds_generateFrom, and_comm] using (h_nhds x).eq_biInf
/-- If a family of open sets `s` is such that every open neighbourhood contains some
member of `s`, then `s` is a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds {s : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, IsOpen u)
(h_nhds : ∀ (a : α) (u : Set α), a ∈ u → IsOpen u → ∃ v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
IsTopologicalBasis s :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds <| fun a ↦
(nhds_basis_opens a).to_hasBasis' (by simpa [and_assoc] using h_nhds a)
fun _ ⟨hts, hat⟩ ↦ (h_open _ hts).mem_nhds hat
/-- A set `s` is in the neighbourhood of `a` iff there is some basis set `t`, which
contains `a` and is itself contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom, nhds_generateFrom, biInf_sets_eq]
· simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
· rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩
exact ⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_left),
le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_right)⟩
· rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by simp [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, hb.mem_nhds_iff]
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_isOpen_of_subset {s s' : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s', IsOpen u)
(hs : IsTopologicalBasis s) (hss' : s ⊆ s') : IsTopologicalBasis s' :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds h_open fun a _ ha u_open ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := hs.isOpen_iff.mp u_open a ha; ⟨t, hss' hts, ht⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t : Set α => t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) fun t => t :=
⟨fun s => hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [and_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : IsOpen s := by
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom]
exact .basic s hs
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (insert ∅ s) :=
h.of_isOpen_of_subset (by rintro _ (rfl | hu); exacts [isOpen_empty, h.isOpen hu])
(subset_insert ..)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (s \ {∅}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun _ hu ↦ h.isOpen hu.1) fun a _ ha hu ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := h.isOpen_iff.mp hu a ha
⟨t, ⟨hts, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' ht.1 <| not_mem_empty _⟩, ht⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) (ha : a ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
(hb.isOpen hs).mem_nhds ha
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b)
{a : α} {u : Set α} (au : a ∈ u) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 <| IsOpen.mem_nhds ou au
/-- Any open set is the union of the basis sets contained in it. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : u = ⋃₀ { s ∈ B | s ⊆ u } :=
ext fun _a =>
⟨fun ha =>
let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou
⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_b, ⟨_, bu⟩, ab⟩ => bu ab⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }, fun _ h => h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} : IsOpen u ↔ ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨hB.open_eq_sUnion, fun ⟨_S, hSB, hu⟩ => hu.symm ▸ isOpen_sUnion fun _s hs => hB.isOpen (hSB hs)⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → Set α), (u = ⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥({ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }), (↑), by
rw [← sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou, fun s => And.left s.2⟩
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.subset_of_forall_subset {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t) : s ⊆ t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs]; simpa [sUnion_subset_iff]
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.eq_of_forall_subset_iff {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s ↔ U ⊆ t) : s = t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ht]
exact congr_arg _ (Set.ext fun U ↦ and_congr_right <| h _)
/-- A point `a` is in the closure of `s` iff all basis sets containing `a` intersect `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α}
{a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_hasBasis).trans <| by simp only [and_imp]
/-- A set is dense iff it has non-trivial intersection with all basis sets. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, Set.Nonempty o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp only [Dense, hb.mem_closure_iff]
exact ⟨fun h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩ => h a o hb ha, fun h a o hb ha => h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set α)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun H o ho => H _ (hB.isOpen ho), fun hf o ho => ?_⟩
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' ho, sUnion_eq_iUnion, image_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun s => hf s s.2.1
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset {B : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} (hu : u.Nonempty) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ B, Set.Nonempty v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hu
let ⟨v, vB, xv, vu⟩ := hb.exists_subset_of_mem_open hx ou
⟨v, vB, ⟨x, xv⟩, vu⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_opens : IsTopologicalBasis { U : Set α | IsOpen U } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by tauto) (by tauto)
protected lemma IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {T : Set (Set β)}
(hf : IsInducing f) (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) : IsTopologicalBasis ((preimage f) '' T) :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ by
convert (hf.basis_nhds (h.nhds_hasBasis (a := f a))).to_image_id with s
aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsTopologicalBasis.inducing := IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.induced {α} [s : TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{T : Set (Set β)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f s) ((preimage f) '' T) :=
h.isInducing (t := induced f s) (.induced f)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {B₁ B₂ : Set (Set β)}
(h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁) B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₂) B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁ ⊓ t₂) (image2 (· ∩ ·) B₁ B₂) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds (t := ?_) fun a ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_inf (t₁ := t₁)]
convert ((h₁.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₁)).inf (h₂.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₂))).to_image_id
aesop
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf_induced {γ} [s : TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) (f₁ : γ → α)
(f₂ : γ → β) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f₁ t ⊓ induced f₂ s) (image2 (f₁ ⁻¹' · ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' ·) B₁ B₂) := by
simpa only [image2_image_left, image2_image_right] using (h₁.induced f₁).inf (h₂.induced f₂)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.prod {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) B₁ B₂) :=
h₁.inf_induced h₂ Prod.fst Prod.snd
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → Set α} (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
(Uc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) {b : ∀ i, Set (Set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (b i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' b i) := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun u hu => ?_) ?_
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩
exact (Uo i).isOpenMap_subtype_val _ ((hb i).isOpen sb)
· intro a u ha uo
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open ha (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_val) with
⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩
exact ⟨(↑) '' v, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{B : Set (Set β)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [hB.eq_generateFrom, continuous_generateFrom_iff]
@[simp] lemma isTopologicalBasis_empty : IsTopologicalBasis (∅ : Set (Set α)) ↔ IsEmpty α where
mp h := by simpa using h.sUnion_eq.symm
mpr h := ⟨by simp, by simp [Set.univ_eq_empty_iff.2], Subsingleton.elim ..⟩
variable (α)
/-- A separable space is one with a countable dense subset, available through
`TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense`. If `α` is also known to be nonempty, then
`TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` provides a sequence `ℕ → α` with dense range, see
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` is a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter (e.g., an `EMetricSpace`), then
this condition is equivalent to `SecondCountableTopology α`. In this case the
latter should be used as a typeclass argument in theorems because Lean can automatically deduce
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace` from `SecondCountableTopology` but it can't
deduce `SecondCountableTopology` from `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`.
Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: the previous paragraph describes the state of the art in Lean 3.
We can have instance cycles in Lean 4 but we might want to
postpone adding them till after the port. -/
@[mk_iff] class SeparableSpace : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable dense set. -/
exists_countable_dense : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s
theorem exists_countable_dense [SeparableSpace α] : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
SeparableSpace.exists_countable_dense
/-- A nonempty separable space admits a sequence with dense range. Instead of running `cases` on the
conclusion of this lemma, you might want to use `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` and
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
theorem exists_dense_seq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, DenseRange u := by
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range.mp hs
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩
/-- A dense sequence in a non-empty separable topological space.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
def denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ℕ → α :=
Classical.choose (exists_dense_seq α)
/-- The sequence `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq α` has dense range. -/
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : DenseRange (denseSeq α) :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
variable {α}
instance (priority := 100) Countable.to_separableSpace [Countable α] : SeparableSpace α where
exists_countable_dense := ⟨Set.univ, Set.countable_univ, dense_univ⟩
/-- If `f` has a dense range and its domain is countable, then its codomain is a separable space.
See also `DenseRange.separableSpace`. -/
theorem SeparableSpace.of_denseRange {ι : Sort _} [Countable ι] (u : ι → α) (hu : DenseRange u) :
SeparableSpace α :=
⟨⟨range u, countable_range u, hu⟩⟩
alias _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace' := SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
/-- If `α` is a separable space and `f : α → β` is a continuous map with dense range, then `β` is
a separable space as well. E.g., the completion of a separable uniform space is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (h : DenseRange f) (h' : Continuous f) : SeparableSpace β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
⟨⟨f '' s, Countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
theorem _root_.Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : IsQuotientMap f) : SeparableSpace β :=
hf.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace hf.continuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias _root_.QuotientMap.separableSpace := Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace
/-- The product of two separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] [SeparableSpace β] : SeparableSpace (α × β) := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩
rcases exists_countable_dense β with ⟨t, htc, htd⟩
exact ⟨⟨s ×ˢ t, hsc.prod htc, hsd.prod htd⟩⟩
/-- The product of a countable family of separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SeparableSpace (X i)]
[Countable ι] : SeparableSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
choose t htc htd using (exists_countable_dense <| X ·)
haveI := fun i ↦ (htc i).to_subtype
nontriviality ∀ i, X i; inhabit ∀ i, X i
classical
set f : (Σ I : Finset ι, ∀ i : I, t i) → ∀ i, X i := fun ⟨I, g⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then g ⟨i, hi⟩ else (default : ∀ i, X i) i
refine ⟨⟨range f, countable_range f, dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 hU g hg with ⟨I, u, huo, huU⟩
have : ∀ i : I, ∃ y ∈ t i, y ∈ u i := fun i ↦
(htd i).exists_mem_open (huo i i.2).1 ⟨_, (huo i i.2).2⟩
choose y hyt hyu using this
lift y to ∀ i : I, t i using hyt
refine ⟨f ⟨I, y⟩, huU fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_, mem_range_self (f := f) ⟨I, y⟩⟩
simp only [f, dif_pos hi]
exact hyu ⟨i, _⟩
instance [SeparableSpace α] {r : α → α → Prop} : SeparableSpace (Quot r) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
instance [SeparableSpace α] {s : Setoid α} : SeparableSpace (Quotient s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
/-- A topological space with discrete topology is separable iff it is countable. -/
theorem separableSpace_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology α] : SeparableSpace α ↔ Countable α := by
simp [separableSpace_iff, countable_univ_iff]
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Pairwise.countable_of_isOpen_disjoint [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty) : Countable ι := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨u, u_countable, u_dense⟩
choose f hfu hfs using fun i ↦ u_dense.exists_mem_open (ho i) (hne i)
have f_inj : Injective f := fun i j hij ↦
hd.eq <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨f i, hfs i, hij.symm ▸ hfs j⟩
have := u_countable.to_subtype
exact (f_inj.codRestrict hfu).countable
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s) (ho : ∀ i ∈ a, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i ∈ a, (s i).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.subtype _ _).countable_of_isOpen_disjoint (Subtype.forall.2 ho) (Subtype.forall.2 hne)
/-- In a separable space, a family of disjoint sets with nonempty interiors is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s)
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, (interior (s i)).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.mono fun _ => interior_subset).countable_of_isOpen (fun _ _ => isOpen_interior) ha
/-- A set `s` in a topological space is separable if it is contained in the closure of a countable
set `c`. Beware that this definition does not require that `c` is contained in `s` (to express the
latter, use `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace s` or
`TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (univ : Set s))`. In metric spaces, the two definitions are
equivalent, see `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace`. -/
def IsSeparable (s : Set α) :=
∃ c : Set α, c.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure c
theorem IsSeparable.mono {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : u ⊆ s) : IsSeparable u := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hs⟩
exact ⟨c, c_count, hu.trans hs⟩
theorem IsSeparable.iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) : IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) := by
choose c hc h'c using hs
refine ⟨⋃ i, c i, countable_iUnion hc, iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun i => ?_⟩
exact (h'c i).trans (closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ i))
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i) :=
⟨fun h i ↦ h.mono <| subset_iUnion s i, .iUnion⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_union {s t : Set α} : IsSeparable (s ∪ t) ↔ IsSeparable s ∧ IsSeparable t := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem IsSeparable.union {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : IsSeparable u) :
IsSeparable (s ∪ u) :=
isSeparable_union.2 ⟨hs, hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_closure : IsSeparable (closure s) ↔ IsSeparable s := by
simp only [IsSeparable, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
protected alias ⟨_, IsSeparable.closure⟩ := isSeparable_closure
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : IsSeparable s :=
⟨s, hs, subset_closure⟩
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : IsSeparable s :=
hs.countable.isSeparable
theorem IsSeparable.univ_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {X : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (X i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable (univ.pi s) := by
classical
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (univ.pi s) with he | ⟨f₀, -⟩
· rw [he]
exact countable_empty.isSeparable
· choose c c_count hc using h
haveI := fun i ↦ (c_count i).to_subtype
set g : (I : Finset ι) × ((i : I) → c i) → (i : ι) → X i := fun ⟨I, f⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else f₀ i
refine ⟨range g, countable_range g, fun f hf ↦ mem_closure_iff.2 fun o ho hfo ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 ho f hfo with ⟨I, u, huo, hI⟩
rsuffices ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : (i : I) → c i, g ⟨I, f⟩ ∈ Set.pi I u
· exact ⟨g ⟨I, f⟩, hI hf, mem_range_self (f := g) ⟨I, f⟩⟩
suffices H : ∀ i ∈ I, (u i ∩ c i).Nonempty by
choose f hfu hfc using H
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ⟨f i i.2, hfc i i.2⟩, fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [g, dif_pos hi] using hfu i hi
intro i hi
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (hc i <| hf _ trivial) _ (huo i hi).1 (huo i hi).2
lemma isSeparable_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable {f : ∀ i, α i | ∀ i, f i ∈ s i} := by
simpa only [← mem_univ_pi] using IsSeparable.univ_pi h
lemma IsSeparable.prod {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsSeparable s) (ht : IsSeparable t) :
IsSeparable (s ×ˢ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨cs, cs_count, hcs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨ct, ct_count, hct⟩
refine ⟨cs ×ˢ ct, cs_count.prod ct_count, ?_⟩
rw [closure_prod_eq]
gcongr
theorem IsSeparable.image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s)
{f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : IsSeparable (f '' s) := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hc⟩
refine ⟨f '' c, c_count.image _, ?_⟩
rw [image_subset_iff]
exact hc.trans (closure_subset_preimage_closure_image hf)
theorem _root_.Dense.isSeparable_iff (hs : Dense s) :
IsSeparable s ↔ SeparableSpace α := by
simp_rw [IsSeparable, separableSpace_iff, dense_iff_closure_eq, ← univ_subset_iff,
← hs.closure_eq, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
theorem isSeparable_univ_iff : IsSeparable (univ : Set α) ↔ SeparableSpace α :=
dense_univ.isSeparable_iff
theorem isSeparable_range [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsSeparable (range f) :=
image_univ (f := f) ▸ (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 ‹_›).image hf
theorem IsSeparable.of_subtype (s : Set α) [SeparableSpace s] : IsSeparable s := by
simpa using isSeparable_range (continuous_subtype_val (p := (· ∈ s)))
theorem IsSeparable.of_separableSpace [h : SeparableSpace α] (s : Set α) : IsSeparable s :=
IsSeparable.mono (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 h) (subset_univ _)
end TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.iInf {β : Type*} {ι : Type*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace β}
{T : ι → Set (Set β)} (h_basis : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (t := t i) (T i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := ⨅ i, t i)
{ S | ∃ (U : ι → Set β) (F : Finset ι), (∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = ⋂ i ∈ F, U i } := by
let _ := ⨅ i, t i
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds ?_ ?_
· rintro - ⟨U, F, hU, rfl⟩
refine isOpen_biInter_finset fun i hi ↦
(h_basis i).isOpen (t := t i) (hU i hi) |>.mono (iInf_le _ _)
· intro a u ha hu
rcases (nhds_iInf (t := t) (a := a)).symm ▸ hasBasis_iInf'
(fun i ↦ (h_basis i).nhds_hasBasis (t := t i)) |>.mem_iff.1 (hu.mem_nhds ha)
with ⟨⟨F, U⟩, ⟨hF, hU⟩, hUu⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨U, hF.toFinset, ?_, rfl⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_iInter]
· exact fun i hi ↦ (hU i hi).1
· exact fun i hi ↦ (hU i hi).2
· exact hUu
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.iInf_induced {β : Type*} {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*}
[t : Π i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] {T : Π i, Set (Set (X i))}
(cond : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (T i)) (f : Π i, β → X i) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := ⨅ i, induced (f i) (t i))
{ S | ∃ (U : ∀ i, Set (X i)) (F : Finset ι),
(∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = ⋂ (i) (_ : i ∈ F), f i ⁻¹' U i } := by
convert IsTopologicalBasis.iInf (fun i ↦ (cond i).induced (f i)) with S
constructor <;> rintro ⟨U, F, hUT, hSU⟩
· exact ⟨fun i ↦ (f i) ⁻¹' (U i), F, fun i hi ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hUT i hi), hSU⟩
· choose! U' hU' hUU' using hUT
exact ⟨U', F, hU', hSU ▸ (.symm <| iInter₂_congr hUU')⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_pi {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{T : ∀ i, Set (Set (X i))} (cond : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (T i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis { S | ∃ (U : ∀ i, Set (X i)) (F : Finset ι),
(∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = (F : Set ι).pi U } := by
simpa only [Set.pi_def] using IsTopologicalBasis.iInf_induced cond eval
theorem isTopologicalBasis_singletons (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] :
IsTopologicalBasis { s | ∃ x : α, (s : Set α) = {x} } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun _ _ => isOpen_discrete _) fun x _ hx _ =>
⟨{x}, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_singleton x, singleton_subset_iff.2 hx⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_subtype
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)}
(h : TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis B) (p : α → Prop) :
IsTopologicalBasis (Set.preimage (Subtype.val (p := p)) '' B) :=
h.isInducing ⟨rfl⟩
section
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
lemma isOpenMap_eval (i : ι) : IsOpenMap (Function.eval i : (∀ i, π i) → π i) := by
classical
refine (isTopologicalBasis_pi fun _ ↦ isTopologicalBasis_opens).isOpenMap_iff.2 ?_
rintro _ ⟨U, s, hU, rfl⟩
obtain h | h := ((s : Set ι).pi U).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [h]
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· rw [eval_image_pi (mod_cast hi) h]
exact hU _ hi
· rw [eval_image_pi_of_not_mem (mod_cast hi), if_pos h]
exact isOpen_univ
end
theorem Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
[SeparableSpace s] (hs : Dense s) : ∃ t ⊆ s, t.Countable ∧ Dense t :=
let ⟨t, htc, htd⟩ := exists_countable_dense s
⟨(↑) '' t, Subtype.coe_image_subset s t, htc.image Subtype.val,
hs.denseRange_val.dense_image continuous_subtype_val htd⟩
/-- Let `s` be a dense set in a topological space `α` with partial order structure. If `s` is a
separable space (e.g., if `α` has a second countable topology), then there exists a countable
dense subset `t ⊆ s` such that `t` contains bottom/top element of `α` when they exist and belong
to `s`. For a dense subset containing neither bot nor top elements, see
`Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset_no_bot_top`. -/
theorem Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
[PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} [SeparableSpace s] (hs : Dense s) :
∃ t ⊆ s, t.Countable ∧ Dense t ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s → x ∈ t) ∧
∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, htd⟩
refine ⟨(t ∪ ({ x | IsBot x } ∪ { x | IsTop x })) ∩ s, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
exacts [inter_subset_right,
(htc.union ((countable_isBot α).union (countable_isTop α))).mono inter_subset_left,
htd.mono (subset_inter subset_union_left hts), fun x hx hxs => ⟨Or.inr <| Or.inl hx, hxs⟩,
fun x hx hxs => ⟨Or.inr <| Or.inr hx, hxs⟩]
instance separableSpace_univ {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [SeparableSpace α] :
SeparableSpace (univ : Set α) :=
(Equiv.Set.univ α).symm.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace (continuous_id.subtype_mk _)
/-- If `α` is a separable topological space with a partial order, then there exists a countable
dense set `s : Set α` that contains those of both bottom and top elements of `α` that actually
exist. For a dense set containing neither bot nor top elements, see
`exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top`. -/
theorem exists_countable_dense_bot_top (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SeparableSpace α]
[PartialOrder α] :
∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s := by
simpa using dense_univ.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable (α : Type u) [t : TopologicalSpace α]
/-- A first-countable space is one in which every point has a
countable neighborhood basis. -/
class _root_.FirstCountableTopology : Prop where
/-- The filter `𝓝 a` is countably generated for all points `a`. -/
nhds_generated_countable : ∀ a : α, (𝓝 a).IsCountablyGenerated
attribute [instance] FirstCountableTopology.nhds_generated_countable
/-- If `β` is a first-countable space, then its induced topology via `f` on `α` is also
first-countable. -/
theorem firstCountableTopology_induced (α β : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace β]
[FirstCountableTopology β] (f : α → β) : @FirstCountableTopology α (t.induced f) :=
let _ := t.induced f
⟨fun x ↦ nhds_induced f x ▸ inferInstance⟩
variable {α}
instance Subtype.firstCountableTopology (s : Set α) [FirstCountableTopology α] :
FirstCountableTopology s :=
firstCountableTopology_induced s α (↑)
protected theorem _root_.Topology.IsInducing.firstCountableTopology {β : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsInducing f) :
FirstCountableTopology α := by
rw [hf.1]
exact firstCountableTopology_induced α β f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias _root_.Inducing.firstCountableTopology := IsInducing.firstCountableTopology
protected theorem _root_.Topology.IsEmbedding.firstCountableTopology {β : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsEmbedding f) :
FirstCountableTopology α :=
hf.1.firstCountableTopology
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias _root_.Embedding.firstCountableTopology := IsEmbedding.firstCountableTopology
namespace FirstCountableTopology
/-- In a first-countable space, a cluster point `x` of a sequence
is the limit of some subsequence. -/
theorem tendsto_subseq [FirstCountableTopology α] {u : ℕ → α} {x : α}
(hx : MapClusterPt x atTop u) : ∃ ψ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ψ ∧ Tendsto (u ∘ ψ) atTop (𝓝 x) :=
subseq_tendsto_of_neBot hx
end FirstCountableTopology
instance {β} [TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology α] [FirstCountableTopology β] :
FirstCountableTopology (α × β) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [nhds_prod_eq]; infer_instance⟩
section Pi
instance {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Countable ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
[∀ i, FirstCountableTopology (π i)] : FirstCountableTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun f => by rw [nhds_pi]; infer_instance⟩
end Pi
instance isCountablyGenerated_nhdsWithin (x : α) [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 x)] (s : Set α) :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝[s] x) :=
Inf.isCountablyGenerated _ _
variable (α) in
/-- A second-countable space is one with a countable basis. -/
class _root_.SecondCountableTopology : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable set of sets that generates the topology. -/
is_open_generated_countable : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ t = TopologicalSpace.generateFrom b
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.secondCountableTopology {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hc : b.Countable) : SecondCountableTopology α :=
⟨⟨b, hc, hb.eq_generateFrom⟩⟩
lemma SecondCountableTopology.mk' {α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hc : b.Countable) :
@SecondCountableTopology α (generateFrom b) :=
| @SecondCountableTopology.mk α (generateFrom b) ⟨b, hc, rfl⟩
instance _root_.Finite.toSecondCountableTopology [Finite α] : SecondCountableTopology α where
is_open_generated_countable :=
⟨_, {U | IsOpen U}.to_countable, TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_opens.eq_generateFrom⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Bases.lean | 706 | 710 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,475 | 1,477 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 3,477 | 3,480 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-David Salchow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.LinearIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Operator norm: bilinear maps
This file contains lemmas concerning operator norm as applied to bilinear maps `E × F → G`,
interpreted as linear maps `E → F → G` as usual (and similarly for semilinear variants).
-/
suppress_compilation
open Bornology
open Filter hiding map_smul
open scoped NNReal Topology Uniformity
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ E Eₗ F Fₗ G Gₗ 𝓕 : Type*}
section SemiNormed
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Eₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup Fₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Gₗ]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Eₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₃ G]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 Gₗ] {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃}
[RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
section OpNorm
open Set Real
theorem opNorm_ext [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (g : E →SL[σ₁₃] G)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) : ‖f‖ = ‖g‖ :=
opNorm_eq_of_bounds (norm_nonneg _)
(fun x => by
rw [h x]
exact le_opNorm _ _)
fun c hc h₂ =>
opNorm_le_bound _ hc fun z => by
rw [← h z]
exact h₂ z
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
theorem opNorm_le_bound₂ (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) {C : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ C)
(hC : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ C :=
f.opNorm_le_bound h0 fun x => (f x).opNorm_le_bound (mul_nonneg h0 (norm_nonneg _)) <| hC x
theorem le_opNorm₂ [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) (x : E) (y : F) :
‖f x y‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(f x).le_of_opNorm_le (f.le_opNorm x) y
theorem le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) {x : E} {y : F}
{a b c : ℝ} (hf : ‖f‖ ≤ a) (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ b) (hy : ‖y‖ ≤ c) :
‖f x y‖ ≤ a * b * c :=
(f x).le_of_opNorm_le_of_le (f.le_of_opNorm_le_of_le hf hx) hy
end OpNorm
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace LinearMap
lemma norm_mkContinuous₂_aux (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) (x : E) :
‖(f x).mkContinuous (C * ‖x‖) (h x)‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖x‖ :=
(mkContinuous_norm_le' (f x) (h x)).trans_eq <| by
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg x), zero_mul]
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
/-- Create a bilinear map (represented as a map `E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G`) from the corresponding linear
map and existence of a bound on the norm of the image. The linear map can be constructed using
`LinearMap.mk₂`.
If you have an explicit bound, use `LinearMap.mkContinuous₂` instead, as a norm estimate will
follow automatically in `LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le`. -/
def mkContinuousOfExistsBound₂ (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G)
(h : ∃ C, ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuousOfExistsBound
{ toFun := fun x => (f x).mkContinuousOfExistsBound <| let ⟨C, hC⟩ := h; ⟨C * ‖x‖, hC x⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
ext z
simp
map_smul' := fun c x => by
ext z
simp } <|
let ⟨C, hC⟩ := h; ⟨max C 0, norm_mkContinuous₂_aux f C hC⟩
/-- Create a bilinear map (represented as a map `E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G`) from the corresponding linear
map and a bound on the norm of the image. The linear map can be constructed using
`LinearMap.mk₂`. Lemmas `LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le'` and `LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le`
provide estimates on the norm of an operator constructed using this function. -/
def mkContinuous₂ (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G) (C : ℝ) (hC : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :
E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G :=
mkContinuousOfExistsBound₂ f ⟨C, hC⟩
@[simp]
theorem mkContinuous₂_apply (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G) {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) (x : E) (y : F) : f.mkContinuous₂ C hC x y = f x y :=
rfl
theorem mkContinuous₂_norm_le' (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G) {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous₂ C hC‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
mkContinuous_norm_le _ (le_max_iff.2 <| Or.inr le_rfl) (norm_mkContinuous₂_aux f C hC)
theorem mkContinuous₂_norm_le (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] F →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] G) {C : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ C)
(hC : ∀ x y, ‖f x y‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous₂ C hC‖ ≤ C :=
(f.mkContinuous₂_norm_le' hC).trans_eq <| max_eq_left h0
end LinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
/-- Flip the order of arguments of a continuous bilinear map.
For a version bundled as `LinearIsometryEquiv`, see
`ContinuousLinearMap.flipL`. -/
def flip (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : F →SL[σ₂₃] E →SL[σ₁₃] G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
(LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ σ₂₃ σ₁₃ (fun y x => f x y) (fun x y z => (f z).map_add x y)
(fun c y x => (f x).map_smulₛₗ c y) (fun z x y => by simp only [f.map_add, add_apply])
(fun c y x => by simp only [f.map_smulₛₗ, smul_apply]))
‖f‖ fun y x => (f.le_opNorm₂ x y).trans_eq <| by simp only [mul_right_comm]
private theorem le_norm_flip (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : ‖f‖ ≤ ‖flip f‖ :=
f.opNorm_le_bound₂ (norm_nonneg f.flip) fun x y => by
rw [mul_right_comm]
exact (flip f).le_opNorm₂ y x
@[simp]
theorem flip_apply (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) (x : E) (y : F) : f.flip y x = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_flip (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : f.flip.flip = f := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem opNorm_flip (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : ‖f.flip‖ = ‖f‖ :=
le_antisymm (by simpa only [flip_flip] using le_norm_flip f.flip) (le_norm_flip f)
@[simp]
theorem flip_add (f g : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : (f + g).flip = f.flip + g.flip :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_smul (c : 𝕜₃) (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) : (c • f).flip = c • f.flip :=
rfl
variable (E F G σ₁₃ σ₂₃)
/-- Flip the order of arguments of a continuous bilinear map.
This is a version bundled as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`.
For an unbundled version see `ContinuousLinearMap.flip`. -/
def flipₗᵢ' : (E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] E →SL[σ₁₃] G where
toFun := flip
invFun := flip
map_add' := flip_add
map_smul' := flip_smul
left_inv := flip_flip
right_inv := flip_flip
norm_map' := opNorm_flip
variable {E F G σ₁₃ σ₂₃}
@[simp]
theorem flipₗᵢ'_symm : (flipₗᵢ' E F G σ₂₃ σ₁₃).symm = flipₗᵢ' F E G σ₁₃ σ₂₃ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_flipₗᵢ' : ⇑(flipₗᵢ' E F G σ₂₃ σ₁₃) = flip :=
rfl
variable (𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ)
/-- Flip the order of arguments of a continuous bilinear map.
This is a version bundled as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`.
For an unbundled version see `ContinuousLinearMap.flip`. -/
def flipₗᵢ : (E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] Gₗ where
toFun := flip
invFun := flip
map_add' := flip_add
map_smul' := flip_smul
left_inv := flip_flip
right_inv := flip_flip
norm_map' := opNorm_flip
variable {𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ}
@[simp]
theorem flipₗᵢ_symm : (flipₗᵢ 𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ).symm = flipₗᵢ 𝕜 Fₗ E Gₗ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_flipₗᵢ : ⇑(flipₗᵢ 𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ) = flip :=
rfl
variable (F σ₁₂)
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
/-- The continuous semilinear map obtained by applying a continuous semilinear map at a given
vector.
This is the continuous version of `LinearMap.applyₗ`. -/
def apply' : E →SL[σ₁₂] (E →SL[σ₁₂] F) →L[𝕜₂] F :=
flip (id 𝕜₂ (E →SL[σ₁₂] F))
variable {F σ₁₂}
@[simp]
theorem apply_apply' (v : E) (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : apply' F σ₁₂ v f = f v :=
rfl
variable (𝕜 Fₗ)
/-- The continuous semilinear map obtained by applying a continuous semilinear map at a given
vector.
This is the continuous version of `LinearMap.applyₗ`. -/
def apply : E →L[𝕜] (E →L[𝕜] Fₗ) →L[𝕜] Fₗ :=
flip (id 𝕜 (E →L[𝕜] Fₗ))
variable {𝕜 Fₗ}
@[simp]
theorem apply_apply (v : E) (f : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ) : apply 𝕜 Fₗ v f = f v :=
rfl
variable (σ₁₂ σ₂₃ E F G)
/-- Composition of continuous semilinear maps as a continuous semibilinear map. -/
def compSL : (F →SL[σ₂₃] G) →L[𝕜₃] (E →SL[σ₁₂] F) →SL[σ₂₃] E →SL[σ₁₃] G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
(LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜₃) σ₂₃ comp add_comp smul_comp comp_add fun c f g => by
ext
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, coe_smul', coe_comp', Function.comp_apply,
Pi.smul_apply])
1 fun f g => by simpa only [one_mul] using opNorm_comp_le f g
theorem norm_compSL_le : ‖compSL E F G σ₁₂ σ₂₃‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le _ zero_le_one _
variable {σ₁₂ σ₂₃ E F G}
@[simp]
theorem compSL_apply (f : F →SL[σ₂₃] G) (g : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : compSL E F G σ₁₂ σ₂₃ f g = f.comp g :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Continuous.const_clm_comp {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E →SL[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : Continuous f) (g : F →SL[σ₂₃] G) :
Continuous (fun x => g.comp (f x) : X → E →SL[σ₁₃] G) :=
(compSL E F G σ₁₂ σ₂₃ g).continuous.comp hf
-- Giving the implicit argument speeds up elaboration significantly
theorem _root_.Continuous.clm_comp_const {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : X → F →SL[σ₂₃] G}
(hg : Continuous g) (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
Continuous (fun x => (g x).comp f : X → E →SL[σ₁₃] G) :=
(@ContinuousLinearMap.flip _ _ _ _ _ (E →SL[σ₁₃] G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(compSL E F G σ₁₂ σ₂₃) f).continuous.comp hg
variable (𝕜 σ₁₂ σ₂₃ E Fₗ Gₗ)
/-- Composition of continuous linear maps as a continuous bilinear map. -/
def compL : (Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) →L[𝕜] (E →L[𝕜] Fₗ) →L[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] Gₗ :=
compSL E Fₗ Gₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (RingHom.id 𝕜)
theorem norm_compL_le : ‖compL 𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_compSL_le _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem compL_apply (f : Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) (g : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ) : compL 𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ f g = f.comp g :=
rfl
variable (Eₗ) {𝕜 E Fₗ Gₗ}
/-- Apply `L(x,-)` pointwise to bilinear maps, as a continuous bilinear map -/
@[simps! apply]
def precompR (L : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) : E →L[𝕜] (Eₗ →L[𝕜] Fₗ) →L[𝕜] Eₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ :=
(compL 𝕜 Eₗ Fₗ Gₗ).comp L
/-- Apply `L(-,y)` pointwise to bilinear maps, as a continuous bilinear map -/
def precompL (L : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) : (Eₗ →L[𝕜] E) →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Eₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ :=
(precompR Eₗ (flip L)).flip
@[simp] lemma precompL_apply (L : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) (u : Eₗ →L[𝕜] E) (f : Fₗ) (g : Eₗ) :
precompL Eₗ L u f g = L (u g) f := rfl
theorem norm_precompR_le (L : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) : ‖precompR Eₗ L‖ ≤ ‖L‖ :=
calc
‖precompR Eₗ L‖ ≤ ‖compL 𝕜 Eₗ Fₗ Gₗ‖ * ‖L‖ := opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖L‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (norm_compL_le _ _ _ _) (norm_nonneg L)
_ = ‖L‖ := by rw [one_mul]
theorem norm_precompL_le (L : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) : ‖precompL Eₗ L‖ ≤ ‖L‖ := by
rw [precompL, opNorm_flip, ← opNorm_flip L]
exact norm_precompR_le _ L.flip
end ContinuousLinearMap
variable {σ₂₁ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {E' F' : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F']
variable {𝕜₁' : Type*} {𝕜₂' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₁'] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂']
[NormedSpace 𝕜₁' E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂' F'] {σ₁' : 𝕜₁' →+* 𝕜} {σ₁₃' : 𝕜₁' →+* 𝕜₃} {σ₂' : 𝕜₂' →+* 𝕜₂}
{σ₂₃' : 𝕜₂' →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomCompTriple σ₁' σ₁₃ σ₁₃'] [RingHomCompTriple σ₂' σ₂₃ σ₂₃']
[RingHomIsometric σ₂₃] [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃'] [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃']
/-- Compose a bilinear map `E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G` with two linear maps
`E' →SL[σ₁'] E` and `F' →SL[σ₂'] F`. -/
def bilinearComp (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) (gE : E' →SL[σ₁'] E) (gF : F' →SL[σ₂'] F) :
E' →SL[σ₁₃'] F' →SL[σ₂₃'] G :=
((f.comp gE).flip.comp gF).flip
@[simp]
theorem bilinearComp_apply (f : E →SL[σ₁₃] F →SL[σ₂₃] G) (gE : E' →SL[σ₁'] E) (gF : F' →SL[σ₂'] F)
(x : E') (y : F') : f.bilinearComp gE gF x y = f (gE x) (gF y) :=
rfl
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃] [RingHomIsometric σ₁'] [RingHomIsometric σ₂']
/-- Derivative of a continuous bilinear map `f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G` interpreted as a map `E × F → G`
at point `p : E × F` evaluated at `q : E × F`, as a continuous bilinear map. -/
def deriv₂ (f : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) : E × Fₗ →L[𝕜] E × Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ :=
f.bilinearComp (fst _ _ _) (snd _ _ _) + f.flip.bilinearComp (snd _ _ _) (fst _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_deriv₂ (f : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) (p : E × Fₗ) :
⇑(f.deriv₂ p) = fun q : E × Fₗ => f p.1 q.2 + f q.1 p.2 :=
rfl
theorem map_add_add (f : E →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] Gₗ) (x x' : E) (y y' : Fₗ) :
f (x + x') (y + y') = f x y + f.deriv₂ (x, y) (x', y') + f x' y' := by
simp only [map_add, add_apply, coe_deriv₂, add_assoc]
abel
/-- The norm of the tensor product of a scalar linear map and of an element of a normed space
is the product of the norms. -/
@[simp]
theorem norm_smulRight_apply (c : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : Fₗ) : ‖smulRight c f‖ = ‖c‖ * ‖f‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine opNorm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) fun x => ?_
calc
‖c x • f‖ = ‖c x‖ * ‖f‖ := norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖c‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ = ‖c‖ * ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := by ring
· obtain hf | hf := (norm_nonneg f).eq_or_gt
· simp [hf]
· rw [← le_div_iff₀ hf]
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg f)) fun x => ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff₀ hf]
calc
‖c x‖ * ‖f‖ = ‖c x • f‖ := (norm_smul _ _).symm
_ = ‖smulRight c f x‖ := rfl
_ ≤ ‖smulRight c f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
/-- The non-negative norm of the tensor product of a scalar linear map and of an element of a normed
space is the product of the non-negative norms. -/
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_smulRight_apply (c : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : Fₗ) : ‖smulRight c f‖₊ = ‖c‖₊ * ‖f‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| c.norm_smulRight_apply f
variable (𝕜 E Fₗ) in
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight` as a continuous trilinear map:
`smulRightL (c : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : F) (x : E) = c x • f`. -/
def smulRightL : (E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) →L[𝕜] Fₗ →L[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] Fₗ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
{ toFun := smulRightₗ
map_add' := fun c₁ c₂ => by
ext x
simp only [add_smul, coe_smulRightₗ, add_apply, smulRight_apply, LinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun m c => by
ext x
dsimp
rw [smul_smul] }
1 fun c x => by
simp only [coe_smulRightₗ, one_mul, norm_smulRight_apply, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
| le_refl]
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm/Bilinear.lean | 403 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Segments in vector spaces
In a 𝕜-vector space, we define the following objects and properties.
* `segment 𝕜 x y`: Closed segment joining `x` and `y`.
* `openSegment 𝕜 x y`: Open segment joining `x` and `y`.
## Notations
We provide the following notation:
* `[x -[𝕜] y] = segment 𝕜 x y` in locale `Convex`
## TODO
Generalize all this file to affine spaces.
Should we rename `segment` and `openSegment` to `convex.Icc` and `convex.Ioo`? Should we also
define `clopenSegment`/`convex.Ico`/`convex.Ioc`?
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G ι : Type*} {M : ι → Type*}
open Function Set
open Pointwise Convex
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {x y : E}
/-- Segments in a vector space. -/
def segment (x y : E) : Set E :=
{ z : E | ∃ a b : 𝕜, 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ a • x + b • y = z }
/-- Open segment in a vector space. Note that `openSegment 𝕜 x x = {x}` instead of being `∅` when
the base semiring has some element between `0` and `1`.
Denoted as `[x -[𝕜] y]` within the `Convex` namespace. -/
def openSegment (x y : E) : Set E :=
{ z : E | ∃ a b : 𝕜, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ a • x + b • y = z }
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Convex] notation (priority := high) "[" x " -[" 𝕜 "] " y "]" => segment 𝕜 x y
theorem segment_eq_image₂ (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] =
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 • x + p.2 • y) '' { p | 0 ≤ p.1 ∧ 0 ≤ p.2 ∧ p.1 + p.2 = 1 } := by
simp only [segment, image, Prod.exists, mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc]
theorem openSegment_eq_image₂ (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y =
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 • x + p.2 • y) '' { p | 0 < p.1 ∧ 0 < p.2 ∧ p.1 + p.2 = 1 } := by
simp only [openSegment, image, Prod.exists, mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc]
theorem segment_symm (x y : E) : [x -[𝕜] y] = [y -[𝕜] x] :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ => ⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ =>
⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩⟩
theorem openSegment_symm (x y : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x y = openSegment 𝕜 y x :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ => ⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, H⟩ =>
⟨b, a, hb, ha, (add_comm _ _).trans hab, (add_comm _ _).trans H⟩⟩
theorem openSegment_subset_segment (x y : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
fun _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha.le, hb.le, hab, hz⟩
theorem segment_subset_iff :
[x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a b : 𝕜, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
⟨fun H a b ha hb hab => H ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩, fun H _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
hz ▸ H a b ha hb hab⟩
theorem openSegment_subset_iff :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a b : 𝕜, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
⟨fun H a b ha hb hab => H ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩, fun H _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
hz ▸ H a b ha hb hab⟩
end SMul
open Convex
section MulActionWithZero
variable (𝕜)
variable [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E]
theorem left_mem_segment (x y : E) : x ∈ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
⟨1, 0, zero_le_one, le_refl 0, add_zero 1, by rw [zero_smul, one_smul, add_zero]⟩
theorem right_mem_segment (x y : E) : y ∈ [x -[𝕜] y] :=
segment_symm 𝕜 y x ▸ left_mem_segment 𝕜 y x
end MulActionWithZero
section Module
variable (𝕜)
variable [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {x y z : E}
@[simp]
theorem segment_same (x : E) : [x -[𝕜] x] = {x} :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, _, _, hab, hz⟩ => by
simpa only [(add_smul _ _ _).symm, mem_singleton_iff, hab, one_smul, eq_comm] using hz,
fun h => mem_singleton_iff.1 h ▸ left_mem_segment 𝕜 z z⟩
theorem insert_endpoints_openSegment (x y : E) :
insert x (insert y (openSegment 𝕜 x y)) = [x -[𝕜] y] := by
simp only [subset_antisymm_iff, insert_subset_iff, left_mem_segment, right_mem_segment,
openSegment_subset_segment, true_and]
rintro z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine hb.eq_or_gt.imp ?_ fun hb' => ha.eq_or_gt.imp ?_ fun ha' => ?_
· rintro rfl
rw [← add_zero a, hab, one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
· rintro rfl
rw [← zero_add b, hab, one_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· exact ⟨a, b, ha', hb', hab, rfl⟩
variable {𝕜}
theorem mem_openSegment_of_ne_left_right (hx : x ≠ z) (hy : y ≠ z) (hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) :
z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y := by
rw [← insert_endpoints_openSegment] at hz
exact (hz.resolve_left hx.symm).resolve_left hy.symm
theorem openSegment_subset_iff_segment_subset (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s ↔ [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
simp only [← insert_endpoints_openSegment, insert_subset_iff, *, true_and]
end Module
end OrderedSemiring
open Convex
section OrderedRing
variable (𝕜) [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddRightMono 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
section DenselyOrdered
variable [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] [Nontrivial 𝕜] [DenselyOrdered 𝕜]
@[simp]
theorem openSegment_same (x : E) : openSegment 𝕜 x x = {x} :=
Set.ext fun z =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, _, _, hab, hz⟩ => by
simpa only [← add_smul, mem_singleton_iff, hab, one_smul, eq_comm] using hz,
fun h : z = x => by
obtain ⟨a, ha₀, ha₁⟩ := DenselyOrdered.dense (0 : 𝕜) 1 zero_lt_one
refine ⟨a, 1 - a, ha₀, sub_pos_of_lt ha₁, add_sub_cancel _ _, ?_⟩
rw [← add_smul, add_sub_cancel, one_smul, h]⟩
end DenselyOrdered
theorem segment_eq_image (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] = (fun θ : 𝕜 => (1 - θ) • x + θ • y) '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
⟨b, ⟨hb, hab ▸ le_add_of_nonneg_left ha⟩, hab ▸ hz ▸ by simp only [add_sub_cancel_right]⟩,
fun ⟨θ, ⟨hθ₀, hθ₁⟩, hz⟩ => ⟨1 - θ, θ, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₁, hθ₀, sub_add_cancel _ _, hz⟩⟩
theorem openSegment_eq_image (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = (fun θ : 𝕜 => (1 - θ) • x + θ • y) '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 :=
Set.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ =>
⟨b, ⟨hb, hab ▸ lt_add_of_pos_left _ ha⟩, hab ▸ hz ▸ by simp only [add_sub_cancel_right]⟩,
fun ⟨θ, ⟨hθ₀, hθ₁⟩, hz⟩ => ⟨1 - θ, θ, sub_pos.2 hθ₁, hθ₀, sub_add_cancel _ _, hz⟩⟩
theorem segment_eq_image' (x y : E) :
[x -[𝕜] y] = (fun θ : 𝕜 => x + θ • (y - x)) '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert segment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
abel
theorem openSegment_eq_image' (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = (fun θ : 𝕜 => x + θ • (y - x)) '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert openSegment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
abel
theorem segment_eq_image_lineMap (x y : E) : [x -[𝕜] y] =
AffineMap.lineMap x y '' Icc (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert segment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
exact AffineMap.lineMap_apply_module _ _ _
theorem openSegment_eq_image_lineMap (x y : E) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y = AffineMap.lineMap x y '' Ioo (0 : 𝕜) 1 := by
convert openSegment_eq_image 𝕜 x y using 2
exact AffineMap.lineMap_apply_module _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem image_segment (f : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) (a b : E) : f '' [a -[𝕜] b] = [f a -[𝕜] f b] :=
Set.ext fun x => by
simp_rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, mem_image, exists_exists_and_eq_and, AffineMap.apply_lineMap]
@[simp]
theorem image_openSegment (f : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) (a b : E) :
f '' openSegment 𝕜 a b = openSegment 𝕜 (f a) (f b) :=
Set.ext fun x => by
simp_rw [openSegment_eq_image_lineMap, mem_image, exists_exists_and_eq_and,
AffineMap.apply_lineMap]
@[simp]
theorem vadd_segment [AddTorsor G E] [VAddCommClass G E E] (a : G) (b c : E) :
a +ᵥ [b -[𝕜] c] = [a +ᵥ b -[𝕜] a +ᵥ c] :=
image_segment 𝕜 ⟨_, LinearMap.id, fun _ _ => vadd_comm _ _ _⟩ b c
@[simp]
theorem vadd_openSegment [AddTorsor G E] [VAddCommClass G E E] (a : G) (b c : E) :
a +ᵥ openSegment 𝕜 b c = openSegment 𝕜 (a +ᵥ b) (a +ᵥ c) :=
image_openSegment 𝕜 ⟨_, LinearMap.id, fun _ _ => vadd_comm _ _ _⟩ b c
@[simp]
theorem mem_segment_translate (a : E) {x b c} : a + x ∈ [a + b -[𝕜] a + c] ↔ x ∈ [b -[𝕜] c] := by
simp_rw [← vadd_eq_add, ← vadd_segment, vadd_mem_vadd_set_iff]
@[simp]
theorem mem_openSegment_translate (a : E) {x b c : E} :
a + x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 (a + b) (a + c) ↔ x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 b c := by
simp_rw [← vadd_eq_add, ← vadd_openSegment, vadd_mem_vadd_set_iff]
theorem segment_translate_preimage (a b c : E) :
(fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' [a + b -[𝕜] a + c] = [b -[𝕜] c] :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_segment_translate 𝕜 a
theorem openSegment_translate_preimage (a b c : E) :
(fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' openSegment 𝕜 (a + b) (a + c) = openSegment 𝕜 b c :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_openSegment_translate 𝕜 a
theorem segment_translate_image (a b c : E) : (fun x => a + x) '' [b -[𝕜] c] = [a + b -[𝕜] a + c] :=
segment_translate_preimage 𝕜 a b c ▸ image_preimage_eq _ <| add_left_surjective a
theorem openSegment_translate_image (a b c : E) :
(fun x => a + x) '' openSegment 𝕜 b c = openSegment 𝕜 (a + b) (a + c) :=
openSegment_translate_preimage 𝕜 a b c ▸ image_preimage_eq _ <| add_left_surjective a
lemma segment_inter_subset_endpoint_of_linearIndependent_sub
{c x y : E} (h : LinearIndependent 𝕜 ![x - c, y - c]) :
[c -[𝕜] x] ∩ [c -[𝕜] y] ⊆ {c} := by
intro z ⟨hzt, hzs⟩
rw [segment_eq_image, mem_image] at hzt hzs
rcases hzt with ⟨p, ⟨p0, p1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases hzs with ⟨q, ⟨q0, q1⟩, H⟩
have Hx : x = (x - c) + c := by abel
have Hy : y = (y - c) + c := by abel
rw [Hx, Hy, smul_add, smul_add] at H
have : c + q • (y - c) = c + p • (x - c) := by
convert H using 1 <;> simp [sub_smul]
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ : p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := h.eq_zero_of_pair' ((add_right_inj c).1 this).symm
simp
lemma segment_inter_eq_endpoint_of_linearIndependent_sub [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜]
{c x y : E} (h : LinearIndependent 𝕜 ![x - c, y - c]) :
[c -[𝕜] x] ∩ [c -[𝕜] y] = {c} := by
refine (segment_inter_subset_endpoint_of_linearIndependent_sub 𝕜 h).antisymm ?_
simp [singleton_subset_iff, left_mem_segment]
end OrderedRing
theorem sameRay_of_mem_segment [CommRing 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {x y z : E}
(h : x ∈ [y -[𝕜] z]) : SameRay 𝕜 (x - y) (z - x) := by
rw [segment_eq_image'] at h
rcases h with ⟨θ, ⟨hθ₀, hθ₁⟩, rfl⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, ← sub_sub, sub_smul, one_smul] using
(SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (z - y) hθ₀).nonneg_smul_right (sub_nonneg.2 hθ₁)
lemma segment_inter_eq_endpoint_of_linearIndependent_of_ne
[CommRing 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] [NoZeroDivisors 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
{x y : E} (h : LinearIndependent 𝕜 ![x, y]) {s t : 𝕜} (hs : s ≠ t) (c : E) :
[c + x -[𝕜] c + t • y] ∩ [c + x -[𝕜] c + s • y] = {c + x} := by
apply segment_inter_eq_endpoint_of_linearIndependent_sub
simp only [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
suffices H : LinearIndependent 𝕜 ![(-1 : 𝕜) • x + t • y, (-1 : 𝕜) • x + s • y] by
convert H using 1; simp only [neg_smul, one_smul]; abel_nf
nontriviality 𝕜
rw [LinearIndependent.pair_add_smul_add_smul_iff]
aesop
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {x y : E}
theorem midpoint_mem_segment [Invertible (2 : 𝕜)] (x y : E) : midpoint 𝕜 x y ∈ [x -[𝕜] y] := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap]
exact ⟨⅟ 2, ⟨invOf_nonneg.mpr zero_le_two, invOf_le_one one_le_two⟩, rfl⟩
| theorem mem_segment_sub_add [Invertible (2 : 𝕜)] (x y : E) : x ∈ [x - y -[𝕜] x + y] := by
convert midpoint_mem_segment (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x - y) (x + y)
rw [midpoint_sub_add]
theorem mem_segment_add_sub [Invertible (2 : 𝕜)] (x y : E) : x ∈ [x + y -[𝕜] x - y] := by
convert midpoint_mem_segment (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x + y) (x - y)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Segment.lean | 308 | 313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle
/-!
# Closure, interior, and frontier of preimages under `re` and `im`
In this fact we use the fact that `ℂ` is naturally homeomorphic to `ℝ × ℝ` to deduce some
topological properties of `Complex.re` and `Complex.im`.
## Main statements
Each statement about `Complex.re` listed below has a counterpart about `Complex.im`.
* `Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re`: `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial
topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`;
* `Complex.isOpenMap_re`, `Complex.isQuotientMap_re`: in particular, `Complex.re` is an open map
and is a quotient map;
* `Complex.interior_preimage_re`, `Complex.closure_preimage_re`, `Complex.frontier_preimage_re`:
formulas for `interior (Complex.re ⁻¹' s)` etc;
* `Complex.interior_setOf_re_le` etc: particular cases of the above formulas in the cases when `s`
is one of the infinite intervals `Set.Ioi a`, `Set.Ici a`, `Set.Iio a`, and `Set.Iic a`,
formulated as `interior {z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a} = {z | z.re < a}` etc.
## Tags
complex, real part, imaginary part, closure, interior, frontier
-/
open Set Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
/-- `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ re :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- `Complex.im` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ im :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.trans (Homeomorph.prodComm ℝ ℝ), fun _ => rfl⟩
theorem isOpenMap_re : IsOpenMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isOpenMap_im : IsOpenMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isQuotientMap_re : IsQuotientMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_re := isQuotientMap_re
theorem isQuotientMap_im : IsQuotientMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_im := isQuotientMap_im
theorem interior_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : interior (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem interior_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : interior (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : closure (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : closure (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_im _).symm
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | a < z.re } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | a < z.im } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | a ≤ z.re } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | a ≤ z.im } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_im (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
| simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_re (Iio a)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/ReImTopology.lean | 134 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Continuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Normed groups are uniform groups
This file proves lipschitzness of normed group operations and shows that normed groups are uniform
groups.
-/
variable {𝓕 E F : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] {s : Set E} {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_right : IsIsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_left : IsIsometricSMul E E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_inv_inv] using dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂⁻¹ b₁ b₂⁻¹
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_div_div_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
|dist a₁ b₁ - dist a₂ b₂| ≤ dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right, dist_comm b₂] using
abs_dist_sub_le (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) (b₁ * a₂)
open Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
nndist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ nndist a₁ b₁ + nndist a₂ b₂ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
edist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ edist a₁ b₁ + edist a₂ b₂ := by
simp only [edist_nndist]
norm_cast
apply nndist_mul_mul_le
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable {α E : Type*} [SeminormedCommGroup E] [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0}
{f g : α → E} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma lipschitzWith_inv_iff : LipschitzWith K f⁻¹ ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by simp [LipschitzWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma antilipschitzWith_inv_iff : AntilipschitzWith K f⁻¹ ↔ AntilipschitzWith K f := by
simp [AntilipschitzWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma lipschitzOnWith_inv_iff : LipschitzOnWith K f⁻¹ s ↔ LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma locallyLipschitz_inv_iff : LocallyLipschitz f⁻¹ ↔ LocallyLipschitz f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitz]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma locallyLipschitzOn_inv_iff : LocallyLipschitzOn s f⁻¹ ↔ LocallyLipschitzOn s f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitzOn]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LipschitzWith.of_inv, LipschitzWith.inv⟩ := lipschitzWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨AntilipschitzWith.of_inv, AntilipschitzWith.inv⟩ := antilipschitzWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.of_inv, LipschitzOnWith.inv⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LocallyLipschitz.of_inv, LocallyLipschitz.inv⟩ := locallyLipschitz_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨LocallyLipschitzOn.of_inv, LocallyLipschitzOn.inv⟩ := locallyLipschitzOn_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma LipschitzOnWith.mul (hf : LipschitzOnWith Kf f s) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) :
LipschitzOnWith (Kf + Kg) (fun x ↦ f x * g x) s := fun x hx y hy ↦
calc
edist (f x * g x) (f y * g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :=
edist_mul_mul_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y := add_le_add (hf hx hy) (hg hx hy)
_ = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y := (add_mul _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma LipschitzWith.mul (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (Kf + Kg) fun x ↦ f x * g x := by
simpa [← lipschitzOnWith_univ] using hf.lipschitzOnWith.mul hg.lipschitzOnWith
|
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Uniform.lean | 283 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
/-!
# Linear ordered (semi)fields
A linear ordered (semi)field is a (semi)field equipped with a linear order such that
* addition respects the order: `a ≤ b → c + a ≤ c + b`;
* multiplication of positives is positive: `0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b`;
* `0 < 1`.
## Main Definitions
* `LinearOrderedSemifield`: Typeclass for linear order semifields.
* `LinearOrderedField`: Typeclass for linear ordered fields.
-/
-- Guard against import creep.
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linear ordered semifield is a field with a linear order respecting the operations. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemifield (K : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommSemiring K, Semifield K
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linear ordered field is a field with a linear order respecting the operations. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedField (K : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommRing K, Field K
attribute [nolint docBlame] LinearOrderedSemifield.toSemifield LinearOrderedField.toField
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Defs.lean | 100 | 102 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
/-!
# Adjunction between `Γ` and `Spec`
We define the adjunction `ΓSpec.adjunction : Γ ⊣ Spec` by defining the unit (`toΓSpec`,
in multiple steps in this file) and counit (done in `Spec.lean`) and checking that they satisfy
the left and right triangle identities. The constructions and proofs make use of
maps and lemmas defined and proved in structure_sheaf.lean extensively.
Notice that since the adjunction is between contravariant functors, you get to choose
one of the two categories to have arrows reversed, and it is equally valid to present
the adjunction as `Spec ⊣ Γ` (`Spec.to_LocallyRingedSpace.right_op ⊣ Γ`), in which
case the unit and the counit would switch to each other.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec` : The natural transformation `𝟭 _ ⟶ Γ ⋙ Spec`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
universe u
open PrimeSpectrum
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
open TopologicalSpace
open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace
open TopCat.Presheaf
open TopCat.Presheaf.SheafCondition
namespace LocallyRingedSpace
variable (X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
/-- The canonical map from the underlying set to the prime spectrum of `Γ(X)`. -/
def toΓSpecFun : X → PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := fun x =>
comap (X.presheaf.Γgerm x).hom (IsLocalRing.closedPoint (X.presheaf.stalk x))
theorem not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk (r : Γ.obj (op X)) (x : X) :
r ∉ (X.toΓSpecFun x).asIdeal ↔ IsUnit (X.presheaf.Γgerm x r) := by
simp [toΓSpecFun, IsLocalRing.closedPoint]
/-- The preimage of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` under the unit is the basic
open in `X` defined by the same element (they are equal as sets). -/
theorem toΓSpec_preimage_basicOpen_eq (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
X.toΓSpecFun ⁻¹' basicOpen r = SetLike.coe (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r) := by
ext
| dsimp
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [X.toRingedSpace.mem_top_basicOpen]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean | 77 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Compare
import Mathlib.Order.Max
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.RelClasses
import Mathlib.Tactic.Choose
/-!
# Monotonicity
This file defines (strictly) monotone/antitone functions. Contrary to standard mathematical usage,
"monotone"/"mono" here means "increasing", not "increasing or decreasing". We use "antitone"/"anti"
to mean "decreasing".
## Main theorems
* `monotone_nat_of_le_succ`, `monotone_int_of_le_succ`: If `f : ℕ → α` or `f : ℤ → α` and
`f n ≤ f (n + 1)` for all `n`, then `f` is monotone.
* `antitone_nat_of_succ_le`, `antitone_int_of_succ_le`: If `f : ℕ → α` or `f : ℤ → α` and
`f (n + 1) ≤ f n` for all `n`, then `f` is antitone.
* `strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ`, `strictMono_int_of_lt_succ`: If `f : ℕ → α` or `f : ℤ → α` and
`f n < f (n + 1)` for all `n`, then `f` is strictly monotone.
* `strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt`, `strictAnti_int_of_succ_lt`: If `f : ℕ → α` or `f : ℤ → α` and
`f (n + 1) < f n` for all `n`, then `f` is strictly antitone.
## Implementation notes
Some of these definitions used to only require `LE α` or `LT α`. The advantage of this is
unclear and it led to slight elaboration issues. Now, everything requires `Preorder α` and seems to
work fine. Related Zulip discussion:
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Order.20diamond/near/254353352.
## TODO
The above theorems are also true in `ℕ+`, `Fin n`... To make that work, we need `SuccOrder α`
and `IsSuccArchimedean α`.
## Tags
monotone, strictly monotone, antitone, strictly antitone, increasing, strictly increasing,
decreasing, strictly decreasing
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
section Decidable
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a b, a ≤ b → f a ≤ f b)] : Decidable (Monotone f) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a b, a ≤ b → f b ≤ f a)] : Decidable (Antitone f) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → f a ≤ f b)] :
Decidable (MonotoneOn f s) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → f b ≤ f a)] :
Decidable (AntitoneOn f s) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a b, a < b → f a < f b)] : Decidable (StrictMono f) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a b, a < b → f b < f a)] : Decidable (StrictAnti f) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a < b → f a < f b)] :
Decidable (StrictMonoOn f s) := i
instance [i : Decidable (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a < b → f b < f a)] :
Decidable (StrictAntiOn f s) := i
end Decidable
/-! ### Monotonicity on the dual order
Strictly, many of the `*On.dual` lemmas in this section should use `ofDual ⁻¹' s` instead of `s`,
but right now this is not possible as `Set.preimage` is not defined yet, and importing it creates
an import cycle.
Often, you should not need the rewriting lemmas. Instead, you probably want to add `.dual`,
`.dual_left` or `.dual_right` to your `Monotone`/`Antitone` hypothesis.
-/
section OrderDual
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
@[simp]
theorem monotone_comp_ofDual_iff : Monotone (f ∘ ofDual) ↔ Antitone f :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem antitone_comp_ofDual_iff : Antitone (f ∘ ofDual) ↔ Monotone f :=
forall_swap
-- Porting note:
-- Here (and below) without the type ascription, Lean is seeing through the
-- defeq `βᵒᵈ = β` and picking up the wrong `Preorder` instance.
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/logic.2Eequiv.2Ebasic.20mathlib4.23631/near/311744939
@[simp]
theorem monotone_toDual_comp_iff : Monotone (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) ↔ Antitone f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem antitone_toDual_comp_iff : Antitone (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) ↔ Monotone f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem monotoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff : MonotoneOn (f ∘ ofDual) s ↔ AntitoneOn f s :=
forall₂_swap
@[simp]
theorem antitoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff : AntitoneOn (f ∘ ofDual) s ↔ MonotoneOn f s :=
forall₂_swap
@[simp]
theorem monotoneOn_toDual_comp_iff : MonotoneOn (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ AntitoneOn f s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem antitoneOn_toDual_comp_iff : AntitoneOn (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ MonotoneOn f s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem strictMono_comp_ofDual_iff : StrictMono (f ∘ ofDual) ↔ StrictAnti f :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem strictAnti_comp_ofDual_iff : StrictAnti (f ∘ ofDual) ↔ StrictMono f :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem strictMono_toDual_comp_iff : StrictMono (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) ↔ StrictAnti f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem strictAnti_toDual_comp_iff : StrictAnti (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) ↔ StrictMono f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem strictMonoOn_comp_ofDual_iff : StrictMonoOn (f ∘ ofDual) s ↔ StrictAntiOn f s :=
forall₂_swap
@[simp]
theorem strictAntiOn_comp_ofDual_iff : StrictAntiOn (f ∘ ofDual) s ↔ StrictMonoOn f s :=
forall₂_swap
@[simp]
theorem strictMonoOn_toDual_comp_iff : StrictMonoOn (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ StrictAntiOn f s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem strictAntiOn_toDual_comp_iff : StrictAntiOn (toDual ∘ f : α → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ StrictMonoOn f s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem monotone_dual_iff : Monotone (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) ↔ Monotone f := by
rw [monotone_toDual_comp_iff, antitone_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem antitone_dual_iff : Antitone (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) ↔ Antitone f := by
rw [antitone_toDual_comp_iff, monotone_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem monotoneOn_dual_iff : MonotoneOn (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ MonotoneOn f s := by
rw [monotoneOn_toDual_comp_iff, antitoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem antitoneOn_dual_iff : AntitoneOn (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ AntitoneOn f s := by
rw [antitoneOn_toDual_comp_iff, monotoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem strictMono_dual_iff : StrictMono (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) ↔ StrictMono f := by
rw [strictMono_toDual_comp_iff, strictAnti_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem strictAnti_dual_iff : StrictAnti (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) ↔ StrictAnti f := by
rw [strictAnti_toDual_comp_iff, strictMono_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem strictMonoOn_dual_iff :
StrictMonoOn (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ StrictMonoOn f s := by
rw [strictMonoOn_toDual_comp_iff, strictAntiOn_comp_ofDual_iff]
theorem strictAntiOn_dual_iff :
StrictAntiOn (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ) s ↔ StrictAntiOn f s := by
rw [strictAntiOn_toDual_comp_iff, strictMonoOn_comp_ofDual_iff]
alias ⟨_, Monotone.dual_left⟩ := antitone_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, Antitone.dual_left⟩ := monotone_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, Monotone.dual_right⟩ := antitone_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, Antitone.dual_right⟩ := monotone_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, MonotoneOn.dual_left⟩ := antitoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, AntitoneOn.dual_left⟩ := monotoneOn_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, MonotoneOn.dual_right⟩ := antitoneOn_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, AntitoneOn.dual_right⟩ := monotoneOn_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMono.dual_left⟩ := strictAnti_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAnti.dual_left⟩ := strictMono_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMono.dual_right⟩ := strictAnti_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAnti.dual_right⟩ := strictMono_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMonoOn.dual_left⟩ := strictAntiOn_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAntiOn.dual_left⟩ := strictMonoOn_comp_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMonoOn.dual_right⟩ := strictAntiOn_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAntiOn.dual_right⟩ := strictMonoOn_toDual_comp_iff
alias ⟨_, Monotone.dual⟩ := monotone_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, Antitone.dual⟩ := antitone_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, MonotoneOn.dual⟩ := monotoneOn_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, AntitoneOn.dual⟩ := antitoneOn_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMono.dual⟩ := strictMono_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAnti.dual⟩ := strictAnti_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictMonoOn.dual⟩ := strictMonoOn_dual_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictAntiOn.dual⟩ := strictAntiOn_dual_iff
end OrderDual
section WellFounded
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
theorem StrictMono.wellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT β] (hf : StrictMono f) : WellFoundedLT α :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage (· < ·) f) @hf
theorem StrictAnti.wellFoundedLT [WellFoundedGT β] (hf : StrictAnti f) : WellFoundedLT α :=
StrictMono.wellFoundedLT (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
theorem StrictMono.wellFoundedGT [WellFoundedGT β] (hf : StrictMono f) : WellFoundedGT α :=
StrictMono.wellFoundedLT (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (fun _ _ h ↦ hf h)
theorem StrictAnti.wellFoundedGT [WellFoundedLT β] (hf : StrictAnti f) : WellFoundedGT α :=
StrictMono.wellFoundedLT (α := αᵒᵈ) (fun _ _ h ↦ hf h)
end WellFounded
| /-! ### Miscellaneous monotonicity results -/
| Mathlib/Order/Monotone/Basic.lean | 258 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Notation
/-!
# Maps between matroids
This file defines maps and comaps, which move a matroid on one type to a matroid on another
using a function between the types. The constructions are (up to isomorphism)
just combinations of restrictions and parallel extensions, so are not mathematically difficult.
Because a matroid `M : Matroid α` is defined with am embedded ground set `M.E : Set α`
which contains all the structure of `M`, there are several types of map and comap
one could reasonably ask for;
for instance, we could map `M : Matroid α` to a `Matroid β` using either
a function `f : α → β`, a function `f : ↑M.E → β` or indeed a function `f : ↑M.E → ↑E`
for some `E : Set β`. We attempt to give definitions that capture most reasonable use cases.
`Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap` are defined in terms of bare functions rather than
functions defined on subtypes, so are often easier to work in practice than the subtype variants.
In fact, the statement that `N = Matroid.map M f _` for some `f : α → β`
is equivalent to the existence of an isomorphism from `M` to `N`,
except in the trivial degenerate case where `M` is an empty matroid on a nonempty type and `N`
is an empty matroid on an empty type.
This can be simpler to use than an actual formal isomorphism, which requires subtypes.
## Main definitions
In the definitions below, `M` and `N` are matroids on `α` and `β` respectively.
* For `f : α → β`, `Matroid.comap N f` is the matroid on `α` with ground set `f ⁻¹' N.E`
in which each `I` is independent if and only if `f` is injective on `I` and
`f '' I` is independent in `N`.
(For each nonloop `x` of `N`, the set `f ⁻¹' {x}` is a parallel class of `N.comap f`)
* `Matroid.comapOn N f E` is the restriction of `N.comap f` to `E` for some `E : Set α`.
* For an embedding `f : M.E ↪ β` defined on the subtype `↑M.E`,
`Matroid.mapSetEmbedding M f` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `range f`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`.
* For a function `f : α → β` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on `M.E`,
`Matroid.map f hf` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `f '' M.E`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`,
and does not depend on the values `f` takes outside `M.E`.
* `Matroid.mapEmbedding f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ↪ β` is a bundled embedding.
It is defined separately because the global injectivity of `f` gives some nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ≃ β` is a bundled equivalence.
It is defined separately because we get even nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapSetEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : M.E ≃ E` is an equivalence on
subtypes. It gives a matroid on `β` with ground set `E`.
* For `X : Set α`, `Matroid.restrictSubtype M X` is the `Matroid ↥X` with ground set
`univ : Set ↥X`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M ↾ X`.
## Implementation details
The definition of `comap` is the only place where we need to actually define a matroid from scratch.
After `comap` is defined, we can define `map` and its variants indirectly in terms of `comap`.
If `f : α → β` is injective on `M.E`, the independent sets of `M.map f hf` are the images of
the independent set of `M`; i.e. `(M.map f hf).Indep I ↔ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀`.
But if `f` is globally injective, we can phrase this more directly;
indeed, `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f`.
If `f` is an equivalence we have `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f.symm '' I)`.
In order that these stronger statements can be `@[simp]`,
we define `mapEmbedding` and `mapEquiv` separately from `map`.
## Notes
For finite matroids, both maps and comaps are a special case of a construction of
Perfect [perfect1969matroid] in which a matroid structure can be transported across an arbitrary
bipartite graph that may not correspond to a function at all (See [oxley2011], Theorem 11.2.12).
It would have been nice to use this more general construction as a basis for the definition
of both `Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap`.
Unfortunately, we can't do this, because the construction doesn't extend to infinite matroids.
Specifically, if `M₁` and `M₂` are matroids on the same type `α`,
and `f` is the natural function from `α ⊕ α` to `α`,
then the images under `f` of the independent sets of the direct sum `M₁ ⊕ M₂` are
the independent sets of a matroid if and only if the union of `M₁` and `M₂` is a matroid,
and unions do not exist for some pairs of infinite matroids: see [aignerhorev2012infinite].
For this reason, `Matroid.map` requires injectivity to be well-defined in general.
## TODO
* Bundled matroid isomorphisms.
* Maps of finite matroids across bipartite graphs.
## References
* [E. Aigner-Horev, J. Carmesin, J. Fröhlic, Infinite Matroid Union][aignerhorev2012infinite]
* [H. Perfect, Independence Spaces and Combinatorial Problems][perfect1969matroid]
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set Function Set.Notation
namespace Matroid
variable {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} {E I : Set α} {M : Matroid α} {N : Matroid β}
section comap
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`.
Elements with the same (nonloop) image are parallel and the ground set is `f ⁻¹' M.E`.
The matroids `M.comap f` and `M ↾ range f` have isomorphic simplifications;
the preimage of each nonloop of `M ↾ range f` is a parallel class. -/
def comap (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : Matroid α :=
IndepMatroid.matroid <|
{ E := f ⁻¹' N.E
Indep := fun I ↦ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I
indep_empty := by simp
indep_subset := fun _ _ h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset (image_subset _ hIJ), InjOn.mono hIJ h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I B ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hImax hBmax
obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hI'inj⟩ := (not_maximal_subset_iff ⟨hI, hIinj⟩).1 hImax
have h₁ : ¬(N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' I) := by
refine fun hB ↦ hII'.ne ?_
have h_im := hB.eq_of_subset_indep (by simpa) (image_subset _ hII'.subset)
rwa [hI'inj.image_eq_image_iff hII'.subset Subset.rfl] at h_im
have h₂ : (N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' B) := by
refine Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (by simpa using hBmax.1.1) ?_
rintro _ ⟨⟨e, heB, rfl⟩, hfe⟩ hi
rw [restrict_indep_iff, ← image_insert_eq] at hi
have hinj : InjOn f (insert e B) := by
rw [injOn_insert (fun heB ↦ hfe (mem_image_of_mem f heB))]
exact ⟨hBmax.1.2, hfe⟩
refine hBmax.not_prop_of_ssuperset (t := insert e B) (ssubset_insert ?_) ⟨hi.1, hinj⟩
exact fun heB ↦ hfe <| mem_image_of_mem f heB
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨e, he, rfl⟩, he'⟩, hei⟩ := Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (by simpa) h₁ h₂
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ he' (mem_image_of_mem f heI)
rw [← image_insert_eq, restrict_indep_iff] at hei
exact ⟨e, ⟨he, heI⟩, hei.1, (injOn_insert heI).2 ⟨hIinj, he'⟩⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hIX
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := (N ↾ range f).existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (f '' X) (by simp)
(f '' I) (by simpa) (image_subset _ hIX)
simp only [restrict_indep_iff, image_subset_iff, maximal_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
and_assoc] at hJ ⊢
obtain ⟨hIJ, hJ, hJf, hJX, hJmax⟩ := hJ
obtain ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ₀X, hbj⟩ := hIinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hIX
(image_subset f hIJ) (image_subset_iff.2 <| preimage_mono hJX)
obtain rfl : f '' J₀ = J := by rw [← image_preimage_eq_of_subset hJf, hbj.image_eq]
refine ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ, hbj.injOn, hJ₀X, fun K hK hKinj hKX hJ₀K ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← hKinj.image_eq_image_iff hJ₀K Subset.rfl, hJmax hK (image_subset_range _ _)
(image_subset f hKX) (image_subset f hJ₀K)]
subset_ground := fun _ hI e heI ↦ hI.1.subset_ground ⟨e, heI, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma comap_indep_iff : (N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_ground_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).E = f ⁻¹' N.E := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_dep_iff :
(N.comap f).Dep I ↔ N.Dep (f '' I) ∨ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ ¬ InjOn f I) := by
rw [Dep, comap_indep_iff, not_and, comap_ground_eq, Dep, image_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨hi, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [and_iff_left h, ← imp_iff_not_or]
exact fun hI ↦ ⟨hI, hi hI⟩
rintro (⟨hI, hIE⟩ | hI)
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ (hI h).elim, hIE⟩
rw [iff_true_intro hI.1, iff_true_intro hI.2, implies_true, true_and]
simpa using hI.1.subset_ground
@[simp] lemma comap_id (N : Matroid β) : N.comap id = N :=
ext_indep rfl <| by simp [injective_id.injOn]
lemma comap_indep_iff_of_injOn (hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' N.E)) :
(N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) := by
rw [comap_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
refine fun hi ↦ hf.mono <| subset_trans ?_ (preimage_mono hi.subset_ground)
apply subset_preimage_image
@[simp] lemma comap_emptyOn (f : α → β) : comap (emptyOn β) f = emptyOn α := by
simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma comap_loopyOn (f : α → β) (E : Set β) : comap (loopyOn E) f = loopyOn (f ⁻¹' E) := by
rw [eq_loopyOn_iff]; aesop
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis I X ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hI, hinj⟩ := comap_indep_iff.1 h.indep
refine ⟨hI.isBasis_of_forall_insert (image_subset f h.subset) fun e he ↦ ?_, hinj, h.subset⟩
simp only [mem_diff, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, and_imp, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at he
obtain ⟨⟨e, heX, rfl⟩, he⟩ := he
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ (he e heI rfl)
replace h := h.insert_dep ⟨heX, heI⟩
simp only [comap_dep_iff, image_insert_eq, or_iff_not_imp_right, injOn_insert heI,
hinj, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, true_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp, not_not] at h
exact h (fun _ ↦ he)
refine Indep.isBasis_of_forall_insert ?_ h.2.2 fun e ⟨heX, heI⟩ ↦ ?_
· simp [comap_indep_iff, h.1.indep, h.2]
have hIE : insert e I ⊆ (N.comap f).E := by
simp_rw [comap_ground_eq, ← image_subset_iff]
exact (image_subset _ (insert_subset heX h.2.2)).trans h.1.subset_ground
suffices N.Indep (insert (f e) (f '' I)) → ∃ x ∈ I, f x = f e
by simpa [← not_indep_iff hIE, injOn_insert heI, h.2.1, image_insert_eq]
exact h.1.mem_of_insert_indep (mem_image_of_mem f heX)
@[simp] lemma comap_isBase_iff {B : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' B) (f '' (f ⁻¹' N.E)) ∧ B.InjOn f ∧ B ⊆ f ⁻¹' N.E := by
rw [← isBasis_ground_iff, comap_isBasis_iff]; rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis'_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis' I X ↔ N.IsBasis' (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
simp only [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, comap_ground_eq, comap_isBasis_iff,
image_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← and_assoc, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp,
and_imp]
exact fun h _ _ ↦ (image_subset_iff.1 h.indep.subset_ground)
instance comap_finitary (N : Matroid β) [N.Finitary] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).Finitary := by
refine ⟨fun I hI ↦ ?_⟩
rw [comap_indep_iff, indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep]
simp only [forall_subset_image_iff]
refine ⟨fun J hJ hfin ↦ ?_,
fun x hx y hy ↦ (hI _ (pair_subset hx hy) (by simp)).2 (by simp) (by simp)⟩
obtain ⟨J', hJ'J, hJ'⟩ := (surjOn_image f J).exists_bijOn_subset
rw [← hJ'.image_eq] at hfin ⊢
exact (hI J' (hJ'J.trans hJ) (hfin.of_finite_image hJ'.injOn)).1
instance comap_rankFinite (N : Matroid β) [N.RankFinite] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).RankFinite := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := (N.comap f).exists_isBase
refine hB.rankFinite_of_finite ?_
simp only [comap_isBase_iff] at hB
exact (hB.1.indep.finite.of_finite_image hB.2.1)
end comap
section comapOn
variable {E B I : Set α}
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`,
restricted to a ground set `E`.
The matroids `M.comapOn f E` and `M ↾ (f '' E)` have isomorphic simplifications;
elements with the same nonloop image are parallel. -/
def comapOn (N : Matroid β) (E : Set α) (f : α → β) : Matroid α := (N.comap f) ↾ E
lemma comapOn_preimage_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : N.comapOn (f ⁻¹' N.E) f = N.comap f := by
rw [comapOn, restrict_eq_self_iff]; rfl
| @[simp] lemma comapOn_indep_iff :
(N.comapOn E f).Indep I ↔ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I ∧ I ⊆ E) := by
simp [comapOn, and_assoc]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Map.lean | 257 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric IsLocalRing
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt : Type := {x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1}
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
variable {p} {x y : ℤ_[p]}
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by norm_num
one_mem' := by norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one₀ hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
variable {p}
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (subring p)
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
lemma coe_ne_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := by simp
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h :=
Nat.cast_injective (R := ℚ_[p]) (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by simp
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p)
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℤ_[p] := IsUltrametricDist.subtype _
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p} in
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] where
__ := instCommRing
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ rfl
norm_mul_le := by simp [norm_def]
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance : NormMulClass ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun x y ↦ by simp [norm_def]⟩
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
variable {p}
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
@[simp]
theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
theorem norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_padic_norm {q : ℚ_[p]} (hq : ‖q‖ ≤ 1) : @norm ℤ_[p] _ ⟨q, hq⟩ = ‖q‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := padicNormE.norm_p
theorem norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by simp
private def cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq (f : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm) : CauSeq ℚ_[p] fun a => ‖a‖ :=
⟨fun n => f n, fun _ hε => by simpa [norm, norm_def] using f.cauchy hε⟩
variable (p)
instance complete : CauSeq.IsComplete ℤ_[p] norm :=
⟨fun f =>
have hqn : ‖CauSeq.lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f)‖ ≤ 1 :=
padicNormE_lim_le zero_lt_one fun _ => norm_le_one _
⟨⟨_, hqn⟩, fun ε => by
simpa [norm, norm_def] using CauSeq.equiv_lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f) ε⟩⟩
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℝ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹
use k
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ hε (zpow_pos _ _)]
· rw [zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hk
norm_cast
apply le_of_lt
convert Nat.lt_pow_self _ using 1
exact hp.1.one_lt
· exact mod_cast hp.1.pos
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt_rat {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := @exists_pow_neg_lt p _ ε (mod_cast hε)
use k
rw [show (p : ℝ) = (p : ℚ) by simp] at hk
exact mod_cast hk
variable {p}
theorem norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k by rwa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd k
theorem norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd {k : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k by
simpa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd _ _
/-! ### Valuation on `ℤ_[p]` -/
lemma valuation_coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
have := x.2
rwa [Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx, zpow_le_one_iff_right₀, neg_nonpos]
at this
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
/-- `PadicInt.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` to `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) : ℕ := (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation.toNat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma valuation_coe (x : ℤ_[p]) : (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation = x.valuation := by
simp [valuation, valuation_coe_nonneg]
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℤ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [valuation]
lemma le_valuation_add (hxy : x + y ≠ 0) : min x.valuation y.valuation ≤ (x + y).valuation := by
zify; simpa [← valuation_coe] using Padic.le_valuation_add <| coe_ne_zero.2 hxy
@[simp] lemma valuation_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).valuation = x.valuation + y.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe, Padic.valuation_mul (coe_ne_zero.2 hx) (coe_ne_zero.2 hy)]
@[simp]
lemma valuation_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ n).valuation = n * x.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe]
lemma norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖x‖ = p ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ) := by
simp [norm_def, Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
-- TODO: Do we really need this lemma?
@[simp]
theorem valuation_p_pow_mul (n : ℕ) (c : ℤ_[p]) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
((p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n * c).valuation = n + c.valuation := by
rw [valuation_mul (NeZero.ne _) hc, valuation_pow, valuation_p, mul_one]
section Units
/-! ### Units of `ℤ_[p]` -/
theorem mul_inv : ∀ {z : ℤ_[p]}, ‖z‖ = 1 → z * z.inv = 1
| ⟨k, _⟩, h => by
have hk : k ≠ 0 := fun h' => zero_ne_one' ℚ_[p] (by simp [h'] at h)
unfold PadicInt.inv
rw [norm_eq_padic_norm] at h
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos h]
apply Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ hk]
theorem inv_mul {z : ℤ_[p]} (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z.inv * z = 1 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_inv hz]
theorem isUnit_iff {z : ℤ_[p]} : IsUnit z ↔ ‖z‖ = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h with ⟨w, eq⟩
refine le_antisymm (norm_le_one _) ?_
have := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_le_one w) (norm_nonneg z)
rwa [mul_one, ← norm_mul, ← eq, norm_one] at this, fun h =>
⟨⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem norm_lt_one_add {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz1 : ‖z1‖ < 1) (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 + z2‖ < 1 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nonarchimedean _ _) (max_lt hz1 hz2)
theorem norm_lt_one_mul {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 * z2‖ < 1 :=
calc
‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ := by simp
_ < 1 := mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_right (norm_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _) hz2
theorem mem_nonunits {z : ℤ_[p]} : z ∈ nonunits ℤ_[p] ↔ ‖z‖ < 1 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp [norm_le_one z, nonunits, isUnit_iff]
theorem not_isUnit_iff {z : ℤ_[p]} : ¬IsUnit z ↔ ‖z‖ < 1 := by
simpa using mem_nonunits
/-- A `p`-adic number `u` with `‖u‖ = 1` is a unit of `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def mkUnits {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let z : ℤ_[p] := ⟨u, le_of_eq h⟩
⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩
@[simp]
theorem mkUnits_eq {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ((mkUnits h : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = u := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_units (u : ℤ_[p]ˣ) : ‖(u : ℤ_[p])‖ = 1 := isUnit_iff.mp <| by simp
/-- `unitCoeff hx` is the unit `u` in the unique representation `x = u * p ^ n`.
See `unitCoeff_spec`. -/
def unitCoeff {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let u : ℚ_[p] := x * (p : ℚ_[p]) ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ)
have hu : ‖u‖ = 1 := by
simp [u, hx, pow_ne_zero _ (NeZero.ne _), norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation]
mkUnits hu
@[simp]
theorem unitCoeff_coe {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(unitCoeff hx : ℚ_[p]) = x * (p : ℚ_[p]) ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ) := rfl
theorem unitCoeff_spec {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
x = (unitCoeff hx : ℤ_[p]) * (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ x.valuation := by
apply Subtype.coe_injective
push_cast
rw [unitCoeff_coe, mul_assoc, ← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_add₀]
· simp
· exact NeZero.ne _
end Units
section NormLeIff
/-! ### Various characterizations of open unit balls -/
theorem norm_le_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
‖x‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ n ≤ x.valuation := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hx, zpow_le_zpow_iff_right₀, neg_le_neg_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
theorem mem_span_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
x ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) ↔ n ≤ x.valuation := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
suffices c ≠ 0 by
rw [valuation_p_pow_mul _ _ this]
exact le_self_add
contrapose! hx
rw [hx, mul_zero]
· nth_rewrite 2 [unitCoeff_spec hx]
simpa [Units.isUnit, IsUnit.dvd_mul_left] using pow_dvd_pow _
theorem norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) :
‖x‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ x ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· subst hx
simp only [norm_zero, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, inv_nonneg, iff_true, Submodule.zero_mem]
exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
rw [norm_le_pow_iff_le_valuation x hx, mem_span_pow_iff_le_valuation x hx]
theorem norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℤ) :
‖x‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ n ↔ ‖x‖ < (p : ℝ) ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [norm_def]; exact Padic.norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one _ _
theorem norm_lt_pow_iff_norm_le_pow_sub_one (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℤ) :
‖x‖ < (p : ℝ) ^ n ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
theorem norm_lt_one_iff_dvd (x : ℤ_[p]) : ‖x‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ x := by
have := norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow x 1
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, pow_one] at this
rw [← this, norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one]
simp only [zpow_zero, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.natCast_succ, neg_add_cancel, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem pow_p_dvd_int_iff (n : ℕ) (a : ℤ) : (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n ∣ a ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd, norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow,
Ideal.mem_span_singleton, Nat.cast_pow]
end NormLeIff
section Dvr
/-! ### Discrete valuation ring -/
instance : IsLocalRing ℤ_[p] :=
IsLocalRing.of_nonunits_add <| by simp only [mem_nonunits]; exact fun x y => norm_lt_one_add
theorem p_nonnunit : (p : ℤ_[p]) ∈ nonunits ℤ_[p] := by
have : (p : ℝ)⁻¹ < 1 := inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ <| mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
rwa [← norm_p, ← mem_nonunits] at this
theorem maximalIdeal_eq_span_p : maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] = Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p])} := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
simp only [IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, mem_nonunits] at hx
rwa [Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd]
· rw [Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact p_nonnunit
theorem prime_p : Prime (p : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_prime, ← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
· infer_instance
· exact NeZero.ne _
theorem irreducible_p : Irreducible (p : ℤ_[p]) := Prime.irreducible prime_p
instance : IsDiscreteValuationRing ℤ_[p] :=
IsDiscreteValuationRing.ofHasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization
⟨p, irreducible_p, fun {x hx} =>
⟨x.valuation, unitCoeff hx, by rw [mul_comm, ← unitCoeff_spec hx]⟩⟩
theorem ideal_eq_span_pow_p {s : Ideal ℤ_[p]} (hs : s ≠ ⊥) :
∃ n : ℕ, s = Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} :=
IsDiscreteValuationRing.ideal_eq_span_pow_irreducible hs irreducible_p
open CauSeq
instance : IsAdicComplete (maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) ℤ_[p] where
prec' x hx := by
simp only [← Ideal.one_eq_top, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, SModEq.sub_mem, maximalIdeal_eq_span_p,
Ideal.span_singleton_pow, ← norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow] at hx ⊢
let x' : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm := ⟨x, ?_⟩; swap
· intro ε hε
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt p hε
refine ⟨m, fun n hn => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hm⟩
rw [← neg_sub, norm_neg]
exact hx hn
· refine ⟨x'.lim, fun n => ?_⟩
have : (0 : ℝ) < (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := zpow_pos (mod_cast hp.out.pos) _
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := equiv_def₃ (equiv_lim x') this
by_cases hin : i ≤ n
· exact (hi i le_rfl n hin).le
· push_neg at hin
specialize hi i le_rfl i le_rfl
specialize hx hin.le
have := nonarchimedean (x n - x i : ℤ_[p]) (x i - x'.lim)
rw [sub_add_sub_cancel] at this
exact this.trans (max_le_iff.mpr ⟨hx, hi.le⟩)
end Dvr
section FractionRing
instance algebra : Algebra ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
Algebra.ofSubring (subring p)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (x : ℤ_[p]) : algebraMap ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] x = x :=
rfl
instance isFractionRing : IsFractionRing ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] where
map_units' := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by
rwa [algebraMap_apply, isUnit_iff_ne_zero, PadicInt.coe_ne_zero, ←
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero]
surj' x := by
by_cases hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1
· use (⟨x, hx⟩, 1)
rw [Submonoid.coe_one, map_one, mul_one, PadicInt.algebraMap_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
· set n := Int.toNat (-x.valuation) with hn
have hn_coe : (n : ℤ) = -x.valuation := by
rw [hn, Int.toNat_of_nonneg]
rw [Right.nonneg_neg_iff]
rw [Padic.norm_le_one_iff_val_nonneg, not_le] at hx
exact hx.le
set a := x * (p : ℚ_[p]) ^ n with ha
have ha_norm : ‖a‖ = 1 := by
have hx : x ≠ 0 := by
intro h0
rw [h0, norm_zero] at hx
exact hx zero_le_one
rw [ha, padicNormE.mul, padicNormE.norm_p_pow, Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hx,
← zpow_add', hn_coe, neg_neg, neg_add_cancel, zpow_zero]
exact Or.inl (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (NeZero.ne p))
use
(⟨a, le_of_eq ha_norm⟩,
⟨(p ^ n : ℤ_[p]), mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr (NeZero.ne _)⟩)
simp only [a, map_pow, map_natCast, algebraMap_apply, PadicInt.coe_pow,
PadicInt.coe_natCast, Subtype.coe_mk, Nat.cast_pow]
exists_of_eq := by
simp_rw [algebraMap_apply, Subtype.coe_inj]
exact fun h => ⟨1, by rw [h]⟩
end FractionRing
end PadicInt
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 576 | 580 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We prove basic results about univariate polynomials.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal.map
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p q : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S}
(hz : aeval z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp (algebraMap R S) hz inj
theorem degree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S} (hz : aeval z p = 0)
(inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.degree :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root hp hz inj)
end
theorem smul_modByMonic (c : R) (p : R[X]) : c • p %ₘ q = c • (p %ₘ q) := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR | hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (c • (p /ₘ q)) (c • (p %ₘ q)) hq
⟨by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_add, modByMonic_add_div p hq],
(degree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq)⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
/-- `_ %ₘ q` as an `R`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def modByMonicHom (q : R[X]) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p %ₘ q
map_add' := add_modByMonic
map_smul' := smul_modByMonic
theorem mem_ker_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) {p : R[X]} :
p ∈ LinearMap.ker (modByMonicHom q) ↔ q ∣ p :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq)
section
variable [Ring S]
theorem aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root [Algebra R S] {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.Monic) {x : S}
(hx : aeval x q = 0) : aeval x (p %ₘ q) = aeval x p := by
--`eval₂_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root` doesn't work here as it needs commutativity
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq, map_sub, map_mul, hx, zero_mul,
sub_zero]
end
end CommRing
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem trailingDegree_mul : (p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, zero_mul, trailingDegree_zero, top_add]
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mul_zero, trailingDegree_zero, add_top]
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq), natTrailingDegree_mul hp hq]
apply WithTop.coe_add
end NoZeroDivisors
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).rootMultiplicity 0 := by
classical
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, comp_X_add_C_eq_zero_iff]
congr 1
rw [C_0, sub_zero]
convert (multiplicity_map_eq <| algEquivAevalXAddC t).symm using 2
simp [C_eq_algebraMap]
/-- See `Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree'` for the special case of `t = 0`. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).natTrailingDegree :=
rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity.trans rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree'
section nonZeroDivisors
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
theorem Monic.mem_nonZeroDivisors {p : R[X]} (h : p.Monic) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ (h.coeff_natDegree ▸ one_mem R⁰)
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (h : p.leadingCoeff ∈ R⁰) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ h
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (h : p.trailingCoeff ∈ R⁰) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ h
end nonZeroDivisors
theorem natDegree_pos_of_monic_of_aeval_eq_zero [Nontrivial R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
[FaithfulSMul R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root (Monic.ne_zero hp) hx
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R S)).mp (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R S))
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow {p : R[X]} {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
(p * (X - C a) ^ n).rootMultiplicity a = p.rootMultiplicity a + n := by
have h2 := monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mul_left_ne_zero h
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [rootMultiplicity_le_iff h2, add_assoc, add_comm n, ← add_assoc, pow_add,
dvd_cancel_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
exact pow_rootMultiplicity_not_dvd h a
· rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff h2, pow_add]
exact mul_dvd_mul_right (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a) _
/-- The multiplicity of `a` as root of `(X - a) ^ n` is `n`. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow [Nontrivial R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
rootMultiplicity a ((X - C a) ^ n) = n := by
have := rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow (a := a) (n := n) C.map_one_ne_zero
rwa [rootMultiplicity_C, map_one, one_mul, zero_add] at this
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self [Nontrivial R] {x : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C x) = 1 :=
pow_one (X - C x) ▸ rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow x 1
-- Porting note: swapped instance argument order
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] [DecidableEq R] {x y : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C y) = if x = y then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with hxy
· rw [hxy]
exact rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self
exact rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (mt root_X_sub_C.mp (Ne.symm hxy))
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul' {p q : R[X]} {x : R}
(hpq : (p /ₘ (X - C x) ^ p.rootMultiplicity x).eval x *
(q /ₘ (X - C x) ^ q.rootMultiplicity x).eval x ≠ 0) :
rootMultiplicity x (p * q) = rootMultiplicity x p + rootMultiplicity x q := by
simp_rw [eval_divByMonic_eq_trailingCoeff_comp] at hpq
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree, mul_comp, natTrailingDegree_mul' hpq]
theorem Monic.neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
((-1) ^ p.natDegree * p.comp (-X)).Monic := by
simp only [Monic]
calc
((-1) ^ p.natDegree * p.comp (-X)).leadingCoeff =
(p.comp (-X) * C ((-1) ^ p.natDegree)).leadingCoeff := by
simp [mul_comm]
_ = 1 := by
apply monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one
simp [← pow_add, hp]
variable [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_eq_degree_of_associated (h : Associated p q) : degree p = degree q := by
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
simp [hu.symm]
theorem prime_X_sub_C (r : R) : Prime (X - C r) :=
⟨X_sub_C_ne_zero r, not_isUnit_X_sub_C r, fun _ _ => by
simp_rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot.def, eval_mul, mul_eq_zero]
exact id⟩
theorem prime_X : Prime (X : R[X]) := by
convert prime_X_sub_C (0 : R)
simp
theorem Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) (hm : Monic p) : Prime p :=
have : p = X - C (-p.coeff 0) := by simpa [hm.leadingCoeff] using eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hp1
this.symm ▸ prime_X_sub_C _
theorem irreducible_X_sub_C (r : R) : Irreducible (X - C r) :=
(prime_X_sub_C r).irreducible
theorem irreducible_X : Irreducible (X : R[X]) :=
Prime.irreducible prime_X
theorem Monic.irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) (hm : Monic p) : Irreducible p :=
(hm.prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
lemma aeval_ne_zero_of_isCoprime {R} [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial S] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
{p q : R[X]} (h : IsCoprime p q) (s : S) : aeval s p ≠ 0 ∨ aeval s q ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! hpq
rcases h with ⟨_, _, h⟩
apply_fun aeval s at h
simp only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hpq.left, hpq.right, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem isCoprime_X_sub_C_of_isUnit_sub {R} [CommRing R] {a b : R} (h : IsUnit (a - b)) :
IsCoprime (X - C a) (X - C b) :=
⟨-C h.unit⁻¹.val, C h.unit⁻¹.val, by
rw [neg_mul_comm, ← left_distrib, neg_add_eq_sub, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, ← C_sub, ← C_mul]
rw [← C_1]
congr
| exact h.val_inv_mul⟩
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C {K} [Field K] {I : Type v} {s : I → K} (H : Function.Injective s) :
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : I => X - C (s i)) := fun _ _ hij =>
isCoprime_X_sub_C_of_isUnit_sub (sub_ne_zero_of_ne <| H.ne hij).isUnit
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 226 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
| theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 559 | 560 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
| · exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 184 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
/-!
# Bounds on specific values of the exponential
-/
namespace Real
open IsAbsoluteValue Finset CauSeq Complex
theorem exp_one_near_10 : |exp 1 - 2244083 / 825552| ≤ 1 / 10 ^ 10 := by
apply exp_approx_start
iterate 13 refine exp_1_approx_succ_eq (by norm_num1; rfl) (by norm_cast) ?_
norm_num1
refine exp_approx_end' _ (by norm_num1; rfl) _ (by norm_cast) (by simp) ?_
rw [_root_.abs_one, abs_of_pos] <;> norm_num1
theorem exp_one_near_20 : |exp 1 - 363916618873 / 133877442384| ≤ 1 / 10 ^ 20 := by
apply exp_approx_start
iterate 21 refine exp_1_approx_succ_eq (by norm_num1; rfl) (by norm_cast) ?_
norm_num1
refine exp_approx_end' _ (by norm_num1; rfl) _ (by norm_cast) (by simp) ?_
rw [_root_.abs_one, abs_of_pos] <;> norm_num1
theorem exp_one_gt_d9 : 2.7182818283 < exp 1 :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) (sub_le_comm.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 exp_one_near_10).2)
theorem exp_one_lt_d9 : exp 1 < 2.7182818286 :=
| lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 exp_one_near_10).1) (by norm_num)
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/ExponentialBounds.lean | 36 | 37 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pierre-Alexandre Bazin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pierre-Alexandre Bazin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ZMod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Torsion
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Torsion submodules
## Main definitions
* `torsionOf R M x` : the torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy R M a` : the `a`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBySet R M s` : the submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`.
* `Submodule.torsion' R M S` : the `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0` for some `a` in `S`.
* `Submodule.torsion R M` : the torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for some non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBy R M a` : the property that defines an `a`-torsion module. Similarly,
`IsTorsionBySet`, `IsTorsion'` and `IsTorsion`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBySet.module` : Creates an `R ⧸ I`-module from an `R`-module that
`IsTorsionBySet R _ I`.
## Main statements
* `quot_torsionOf_equiv_span_singleton` : isomorphism between the span of an element of `M` and
the quotient by its torsion ideal.
* `torsion' R M S` and `torsion R M` are submodules.
* `torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span` : torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_is_torsionBy` : the `a`-torsion submodule is an `a`-torsion module.
Similar lemmas for `torsion'` and `torsion`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_isInternal` : a `∏ i, p i`-torsion module is the internal direct sum of its
`p i`-torsion submodules when the `p i` are pairwise coprime. A more general version with coprime
ideals is `Submodule.torsionBySet_is_internal`.
* `Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors_iff_torsion_bot` : a module over a domain has
`NoZeroSMulDivisors` (that is, there is no non-zero `a`, `x` such that `a • x = 0`)
iff its torsion submodule is trivial.
* `Submodule.QuotientTorsion.torsion_eq_bot` : quotienting by the torsion submodule makes the
torsion submodule of the new module trivial. If `R` is a domain, we can derive an instance
`Submodule.QuotientTorsion.noZeroSMulDivisors : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (M ⧸ torsion R M)`.
## Notation
* The notions are defined for a `CommSemiring R` and a `Module R M`. Some additional hypotheses on
`R` and `M` are required by some lemmas.
* The letters `a`, `b`, ... are used for scalars (in `R`), while `x`, `y`, ... are used for vectors
(in `M`).
## Tags
Torsion, submodule, module, quotient
-/
namespace Ideal
section TorsionOf
variable (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- The torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionOf (x : M) : Ideal R :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/1629
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x)
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_zero : torsionOf R M (0 : M) = ⊤ := by simp [torsionOf]
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionOf_iff (x : M) (a : R) : a ∈ torsionOf R M x ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_top_iff (m : M) : torsionOf R M m = ⊤ ↔ m = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
rw [← one_smul R m, ← mem_torsionOf_iff m (1 : R), h]
exact Submodule.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_bot_iff_of_noZeroSMulDivisors [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (m : M) :
torsionOf R M m = ⊥ ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h contra => ?_, fun h => (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun r hr => ?_⟩
· rw [contra, torsionOf_zero] at h
exact bot_ne_top.symm h
· rw [mem_torsionOf_iff, smul_eq_zero] at hr
tauto
/-- See also `iSupIndep.linearIndependent` which provides the same conclusion
but requires the stronger hypothesis `NoZeroSMulDivisors R M`. -/
theorem iSupIndep.linearIndependent' {ι R M : Type*} {v : ι → M} [Ring R]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (hv : iSupIndep fun i => R ∙ v i)
(h_ne_zero : ∀ i, Ideal.torsionOf R M (v i) = ⊥) : LinearIndependent R v := by
refine linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span.mpr fun i r hi => ?_
replace hv := iSupIndep_def.mp hv i
simp only [iSup_subtype', ← Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup (ι := Subtype _), disjoint_iff] at hv
have : r • v i ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) := by
rw [← hv, Submodule.mem_inf]
refine ⟨Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨r, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
convert hi
ext
simp
rw [← Submodule.mem_bot R, ← h_ne_zero i]
simpa using this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.Independent.linear_independent' := iSupIndep.linearIndependent'
end TorsionOf
section
variable (R M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
/-- The span of `x` in `M` is isomorphic to `R` quotiented by the torsion ideal of `x`. -/
noncomputable def quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton (x : M) : (R ⧸ torsionOf R M x) ≃ₗ[R] R ∙ x :=
(LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x).quotKerEquivRange.trans <|
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ (LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range R M x).symm
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk (x : M) (a : R) :
quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton R M x (Submodule.Quotient.mk a) =
a • ⟨x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ :=
rfl
end
end Ideal
open nonZeroDivisors
section Defs
namespace Submodule
variable (R M : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
-- TODO: generalize to `Submodule S M` with `SMulCommClass R S M`.
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule for `a` in `R`, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBy (a : R) : Submodule R M :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/1629
LinearMap.ker (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M a)
/-- The submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBySet (s : Set R) : Submodule R M :=
sInf (torsionBy R M '' s)
/-- The `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
`a` in `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsion' (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass S R M] :
Submodule R M where
carrier := { x | ∃ a : S, a • x = 0 }
add_mem' := by
intro x y ⟨a,hx⟩ ⟨b,hy⟩
use b * a
rw [smul_add, mul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul, hx, hy, smul_zero, smul_zero, add_zero]
zero_mem' := ⟨1, smul_zero 1⟩
smul_mem' := fun a x ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨b, by rw [smul_comm, h, smul_zero]⟩
/-- The torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`. -/
abbrev torsion :=
torsion' R M R⁰
end Submodule
namespace Module
variable (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- An `a`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBy (a : R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, a • x = 0
/-- A module where every element is `a`-torsion for all `a` in `s`. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBySet (s : Set R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄ ⦃a : s⦄, (a : R) • x = 0
/-- An `S`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some `a` in `S`. -/
abbrev IsTorsion' (S : Type*) [SMul S M] :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : S, a • x = 0
/-- A torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some non-zero-divisor `a`.
-/
abbrev IsTorsion :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : R⁰, a • x = 0
theorem isTorsionBySet_annihilator : IsTorsionBySet R M (annihilator R M) :=
fun _ r ↦ Module.mem_annihilator.mp r.2 _
theorem isTorsionBy_iff_mem_annihilator {a : R} :
IsTorsionBy R M a ↔ a ∈ annihilator R M := by
rw [IsTorsionBy, mem_annihilator]
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_subset_annihilator {s : Set R} :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ s ⊆ annihilator R M := by
simp_rw [IsTorsionBySet, Set.subset_def, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_annihilator]
rw [forall_comm, SetCoe.forall]
end Module
end Defs
lemma isSMulRegular_iff_torsionBy_eq_bot {R} (M : Type*)
[CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (r : R) :
IsSMulRegular M r ↔ Submodule.torsionBy R M r = ⊥ :=
Iff.symm (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M r).ker_eq_bot
variable {R M : Type*}
section
namespace Submodule
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
@[simp]
theorem smul_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext x.prop
@[simp]
theorem smul_coe_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • (x : M) = 0 :=
x.prop
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBy_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBy R M a ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBySet_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBySet R M s ↔ ∀ a : s, (a : R) • x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ⟨a, ha⟩ => mem_sInf.mp h _ (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ ha), fun h => mem_sInf.mpr ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact h ⟨a, ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_singleton_eq : torsionBySet R M {a} = torsionBy R M a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_torsionBySet_iff, SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
forall_eq, mem_torsionBy_iff]
theorem torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset {s t : Set R} (st : s ⊆ t) :
torsionBySet R M t ≤ torsionBySet R M s :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ⟨a, st ha, h⟩
/-- Torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it. -/
theorem torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span :
torsionBySet R M s = torsionBySet R M (Ideal.span s) := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x hx => ?_) (torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset subset_span)
rw [mem_torsionBySet_iff] at hx ⊢
suffices Ideal.span s ≤ Ideal.torsionOf R M x by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact this ha
rw [Ideal.span_le]
exact fun a ha => hx ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq : torsionBySet R M (R ∙ a) = torsionBy R M a :=
(torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span _).symm.trans <| torsionBySet_singleton_eq _
theorem torsionBy_le_torsionBy_of_dvd (a b : R) (dvd : a ∣ b) :
torsionBy R M a ≤ torsionBy R M b := by
rw [← torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq, ← torsionBySet_singleton_eq]
apply torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
rintro c (rfl : c = b); exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mpr dvd
@[simp]
theorem torsionBy_one : torsionBy R M 1 = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr fun _ h => by
rw [mem_torsionBy_iff, one_smul] at h
exact h
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_univ : torsionBySet R M Set.univ = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← torsionBy_one, ← torsionBySet_singleton_eq]
exact torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset fun _ _ => trivial
end Submodule
open Submodule
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
theorem isTorsionBySet_of_subset {s t : Set R} (h : s ⊆ t)
(ht : IsTorsionBySet R M t) : IsTorsionBySet R M s :=
fun m r ↦ @ht m ⟨r, h r.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff : IsTorsionBySet R M {a} ↔ IsTorsionBy R M a := by
refine ⟨fun h x => @h _ ⟨_, Set.mem_singleton _⟩, fun h x => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨b, rfl : b = a⟩; exact @h _
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ IsTorsionBySet R M (Ideal.span s) := by
simpa only [isTorsionBySet_iff_subset_annihilator] using Ideal.span_le.symm
theorem isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff : IsTorsionBySet R M (R ∙ a) ↔ IsTorsionBy R M a :=
(isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span _).symm.trans <| isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff _
end Module
namespace Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ torsionBySet R M s = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => eq_top_iff.mpr fun _ _ => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mpr <| @h _, fun h x => by
rw [← mem_torsionBySet_iff, h]
trivial⟩
/-- An `a`-torsion module is a module whose `a`-torsion submodule is the full space. -/
theorem isTorsionBy_iff_torsionBy_eq_top : IsTorsionBy R M a ↔ torsionBy R M a = ⊤ := by
rw [← torsionBySet_singleton_eq, ← isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff,
isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top]
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_subseteq_ker_lsmul :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ s ⊆ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lsmul R M) where
mp h r hr := LinearMap.mem_ker.mpr <| LinearMap.ext fun x => @h x ⟨r, hr⟩
mpr | h, x, ⟨_, hr⟩ => DFunLike.congr_fun (LinearMap.mem_ker.mp (h hr)) x
theorem isTorsionBy_iff_mem_ker_lsmul :
IsTorsionBy R M a ↔ a ∈ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lsmul R M) :=
Iff.symm LinearMap.ext_iff
end Module
namespace Submodule
open Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
theorem torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet : IsTorsionBySet R (torsionBySet R M s) s :=
fun ⟨_, hx⟩ a => Subtype.ext <| (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mp hx a
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule is an `a`-torsion module. -/
theorem torsionBy_isTorsionBy : IsTorsionBy R (torsionBy R M a) a := smul_torsionBy a
@[simp]
theorem torsionBy_torsionBy_eq_top : torsionBy R (torsionBy R M a) a = ⊤ :=
(isTorsionBy_iff_torsionBy_eq_top a).mp <| torsionBy_isTorsionBy a
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_torsionBySet_eq_top : torsionBySet R (torsionBySet R M s) s = ⊤ :=
(isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top s).mp <| torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet s
variable (R M)
theorem torsion_gc :
@GaloisConnection (Submodule R M) (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ _ _ annihilator fun I =>
torsionBySet R M ↑(OrderDual.ofDual I) :=
fun _ _ =>
⟨fun h x hx => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mpr fun ⟨_, ha⟩ => mem_annihilator.mp (h ha) x hx,
fun h a ha => mem_annihilator.mpr fun _ hx => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mp (h hx) ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
variable {R M}
section Coprime
variable {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Ideal R} {S : Finset ι}
theorem iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf
(hp : (S : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => p i ⊔ p j = ⊤) :
⨆ i ∈ S, torsionBySet R M (p i) = torsionBySet R M ↑(⨅ i ∈ S, p i) := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm
· apply iSup_le _
intro i
apply iSup_le _
intro is
apply torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
exact (iInf_le (fun i => ⨅ _ : i ∈ S, p i) i).trans (iInf_le _ is)
· intro x hx
rw [mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum]
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ :=
(mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum _ _).mp
((Ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).mp <| (Ideal.iSup_iInf_eq_top_iff_pairwise h _).mpr hp)
refine ⟨fun i => ⟨(μ i : R) • x, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_torsionBySet_iff] at hx ⊢
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [smul_smul]
suffices a * μ i ∈ ⨅ i ∈ S, p i from hx ⟨_, this⟩
rw [mem_iInf]
intro j
rw [mem_iInf]
intro hj
by_cases ij : j = i
· rw [ij]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ ha
· have := coe_mem (μ i)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ (this j hj ij)
· rw [← Finset.sum_smul, hμ, one_smul]
theorem supIndep_torsionBySet_ideal (hp : (S : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => p i ⊔ p j = ⊤) :
S.SupIndep fun i => torsionBySet R M <| p i :=
fun T hT i hi hiT => by
rw [disjoint_iff, Finset.sup_eq_iSup,
iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf fun i hi j hj ij => hp (hT hi) (hT hj) ij]
have := GaloisConnection.u_inf
(b₁ := OrderDual.toDual (p i)) (b₂ := OrderDual.toDual (⨅ i ∈ T, p i)) (torsion_gc R M)
dsimp at this ⊢
rw [← this, Ideal.sup_iInf_eq_top, top_coe, torsionBySet_univ]
intro j hj; apply hp hi (hT hj); rintro rfl; exact hiT hj
variable {q : ι → R}
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem iSup_torsionBy_eq_torsionBy_prod (hq : (S : Set ι).Pairwise <| (IsCoprime on q)) :
⨆ i ∈ S, torsionBy R M (q i) = torsionBy R M (∏ i ∈ S, q i) := by
rw [← torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ←
Ideal.finset_inf_span_singleton _ _ hq, Finset.inf_eq_iInf, ←
iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf]
· congr
ext : 1
congr
ext : 1
exact (torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq _).symm
exact fun i hi j hj ij => (Ideal.sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime _ _).mpr (hq hi hj ij)
theorem supIndep_torsionBy (hq : (S : Set ι).Pairwise <| (IsCoprime on q)) :
S.SupIndep fun i => torsionBy R M <| q i := by
convert supIndep_torsionBySet_ideal (M := M) fun i hi j hj ij =>
(Ideal.sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime (q i) _).mpr <| hq hi hj ij
exact (torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq (R := R) (M := M) _).symm
end Coprime
end Submodule
end
section NeedsGroup
namespace Submodule
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {S : Finset ι}
/-- If the `p i` are pairwise coprime, a `⨅ i, p i`-torsion module is the internal direct sum of
its `p i`-torsion submodules. -/
theorem torsionBySet_isInternal {p : ι → Ideal R}
(hp : (S : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => p i ⊔ p j = ⊤)
(hM : Module.IsTorsionBySet R M (⨅ i ∈ S, p i : Ideal R)) :
DirectSum.IsInternal fun i : S => torsionBySet R M <| p i :=
DirectSum.isInternal_submodule_of_iSupIndep_of_iSup_eq_top
(iSupIndep_iff_supIndep.mpr <| supIndep_torsionBySet_ideal hp)
(by
apply (iSup_subtype'' ↑S fun i => torsionBySet R M <| p i).trans
-- Porting note: times out if we change apply below to <|
apply (iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf hp).trans <|
(Module.isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top _).mp hM)
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If the `q i` are pairwise coprime, a `∏ i, q i`-torsion module is the internal direct sum of
its `q i`-torsion submodules. -/
theorem torsionBy_isInternal {q : ι → R} (hq : (S : Set ι).Pairwise <| (IsCoprime on q))
(hM : Module.IsTorsionBy R M <| ∏ i ∈ S, q i) :
DirectSum.IsInternal fun i : S => torsionBy R M <| q i := by
rw [← Module.isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ←
Ideal.finset_inf_span_singleton _ _ hq, Finset.inf_eq_iInf] at hM
convert torsionBySet_isInternal
(fun i hi j hj ij => (Ideal.sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime (q i) _).mpr <| hq hi hj ij) hM
exact (torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq _ (R := R) (M := M)).symm
end Submodule
namespace Module
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {I : Ideal R} {r : R}
/-- can't be an instance because `hM` can't be inferred -/
def IsTorsionBySet.hasSMul (hM : IsTorsionBySet R M I) : SMul (R ⧸ I) M where
smul b := QuotientAddGroup.lift I.toAddSubgroup (smulAddHom R M)
(by rwa [isTorsionBySet_iff_subset_annihilator] at hM) b
/-- can't be an instance because `hM` can't be inferred -/
abbrev IsTorsionBy.hasSMul (hM : IsTorsionBy R M r) : SMul (R ⧸ Ideal.span {r}) M :=
((isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff r).mpr hM).hasSMul
@[simp]
theorem IsTorsionBySet.mk_smul [I.IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBySet R M I) (b : R) (x : M) :
haveI := hM.hasSMul
Ideal.Quotient.mk I b • x = b • x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsTorsionBy.mk_smul [(Ideal.span {r}).IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBy R M r) (b : R) (x : M) :
haveI := hM.hasSMul
Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {r}) b • x = b • x :=
rfl
/-- An `(R ⧸ I)`-module is an `R`-module which `IsTorsionBySet R M I`. -/
def IsTorsionBySet.module [I.IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBySet R M I) : Module (R ⧸ I) M :=
letI := hM.hasSMul; I.mkQ_surjective.moduleLeft _ (IsTorsionBySet.mk_smul hM)
instance IsTorsionBySet.isScalarTower [I.IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBySet R M I)
{S : Type*} [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
@IsScalarTower S (R ⧸ I) M _ (IsTorsionBySet.module hM).toSMul _ :=
-- Porting note: still needed to be fed the Module R / I M instance
@IsScalarTower.mk S (R ⧸ I) M _ (IsTorsionBySet.module hM).toSMul _
(fun b d x => Quotient.inductionOn' d fun c => (smul_assoc b c x :))
/-- If a `R`-module `M` is annihilated by a two-sided ideal `I`, then the identity is a semilinear
map from the `R`-module `M` to the `R ⧸ I`-module `M`. -/
def IsTorsionBySet.semilinearMap [I.IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBySet R M I) :
let _ := hM.module; M →ₛₗ[Ideal.Quotient.mk I] M :=
let _ := hM.module
{ toFun := id
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
theorem IsTorsionBySet.isSemisimpleModule_iff [I.IsTwoSided]
(hM : Module.IsTorsionBySet R M I) : let _ := hM.module
IsSemisimpleModule (R ⧸ I) M ↔ IsSemisimpleModule R M :=
let _ := hM.module
(hM.semilinearMap.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective Function.bijective_id).symm
/-- An `(R ⧸ Ideal.span {r})`-module is an `R`-module for which `IsTorsionBy R M r`. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBy.module [h : (Ideal.span {r}).IsTwoSided] (hM : IsTorsionBy R M r) :
Module (R ⧸ Ideal.span {r}) M := by
rw [Ideal.span] at h; exact ((isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff r).mpr hM).module
/-- Any module is also a module over the quotient of the ring by the annihilator.
Not an instance because it causes synthesis failures / timeouts. -/
def quotientAnnihilator : Module (R ⧸ Module.annihilator R M) M :=
(isTorsionBySet_annihilator R M).module
theorem isTorsionBy_quotient_iff (N : Submodule R M) (r : R) :
IsTorsionBy R (M⧸N) r ↔ ∀ x, r • x ∈ N :=
Iff.trans N.mkQ_surjective.forall <| forall_congr' fun _ =>
Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero N
theorem IsTorsionBy.quotient (N : Submodule R M) {r : R}
(h : IsTorsionBy R M r) : IsTorsionBy R (M⧸N) r :=
(isTorsionBy_quotient_iff N r).mpr fun x => @h x ▸ N.zero_mem
theorem isTorsionBySet_quotient_iff (N : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) :
IsTorsionBySet R (M⧸N) s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r ∈ s, r • x ∈ N :=
Iff.trans N.mkQ_surjective.forall <| forall_congr' fun _ =>
Iff.trans Subtype.forall <| forall₂_congr fun _ _ =>
Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero N
theorem IsTorsionBySet.quotient (N : Submodule R M) {s}
(h : IsTorsionBySet R M s) : IsTorsionBySet R (M⧸N) s :=
(isTorsionBySet_quotient_iff N s).mpr fun x r h' => @h x ⟨r, h'⟩ ▸ N.zero_mem
variable (M I) (s : Set R) (r : R)
open Pointwise Submodule
lemma isTorsionBySet_quotient_set_smul :
IsTorsionBySet R (M⧸s • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) s :=
(isTorsionBySet_quotient_iff _ _).mpr fun _ _ h =>
mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h mem_top
lemma isTorsionBySet_quotient_ideal_smul :
IsTorsionBySet R (M⧸I • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) I :=
(isTorsionBySet_quotient_iff _ _).mpr fun _ _ h => smul_mem_smul h ⟨⟩
instance [I.IsTwoSided] : Module (R ⧸ I) (M ⧸ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) :=
(isTorsionBySet_quotient_ideal_smul M I).module
lemma Quotient.mk_smul_mk [I.IsTwoSided] (r : R) (m : M) :
Ideal.Quotient.mk I r •
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) m =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) (r • m) :=
rfl
end Module
namespace Module
variable (M) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (r : R)
open Pointwise
lemma isTorsionBy_quotient_element_smul :
IsTorsionBy R (M⧸r • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) r :=
(isTorsionBy_quotient_iff _ _).mpr (Submodule.smul_mem_pointwise_smul · r ⊤ ⟨⟩)
instance : Module (R ⧸ Ideal.span s) (M ⧸ s • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) :=
((isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span s).mp
(isTorsionBySet_quotient_set_smul M s)).module
instance : Module (R ⧸ Ideal.span {r}) (M ⧸ r • (⊤ : Submodule R M)) :=
(isTorsionBy_quotient_element_smul M r).module
end Module
namespace Submodule
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
instance (I : Ideal R) : Module (R ⧸ I) (torsionBySet R M I) :=
-- Porting note: times out without the (R := R)
Module.IsTorsionBySet.module <| torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet (R := R) I
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet.mk_smul (I : Ideal R) (b : R) (x : torsionBySet R M I) :
Ideal.Quotient.mk I b • x = b • x :=
rfl
instance (I : Ideal R) {S : Type*} [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
[IsScalarTower S R R] : IsScalarTower S (R ⧸ I) (torsionBySet R M I) :=
inferInstance
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule as an `(R ⧸ R∙a)`-module. -/
instance instModuleQuotientTorsionBy (a : R) : Module (R ⧸ R ∙ a) (torsionBy R M a) :=
Module.IsTorsionBySet.module <|
(Module.isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff a).mpr <| torsionBy_isTorsionBy a
instance (a : R) : Module (R ⧸ Ideal.span {a}) (torsionBy R M a) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Module (R ⧸ R ∙ a) (torsionBy R M a)
@[simp]
theorem torsionBy.mk_ideal_smul (a b : R) (x : torsionBy R M a) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {a})) b • x = b • x :=
rfl
theorem torsionBy.mk_smul (a b : R) (x : torsionBy R M a) :
Ideal.Quotient.mk (R ∙ a) b • x = b • x :=
rfl
instance (a : R) {S : Type*} [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (R ⧸ R ∙ a) (torsionBy R M a) :=
inferInstance
/-- Given an `R`-module `M` and an element `a` in `R`, submodules of the `a`-torsion submodule of
`M` do not depend on whether we take scalars to be `R` or `R ⧸ R ∙ a`. -/
def submodule_torsionBy_orderIso (a : R) :
Submodule (R ⧸ R ∙ a) (torsionBy R M a) ≃o Submodule R (torsionBy R M a) :=
{ restrictScalarsEmbedding R (R ⧸ R ∙ a) (torsionBy R M a) with
invFun := fun p ↦
{ carrier := p
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := p.zero_mem
smul_mem' := by rintro ⟨b⟩; exact p.smul_mem b }
left_inv := by intro; ext; simp [restrictScalarsEmbedding]
right_inv := by intro; ext; simp [restrictScalarsEmbedding] }
end Submodule
end NeedsGroup
namespace Submodule
section Torsion'
open Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass S R M]
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsion'_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsion' R M S ↔ ∃ a : S, a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_torsion_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsion R M ↔ ∃ a : R⁰, a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simps]
instance : SMul S (torsion' R M S) :=
⟨fun s x =>
⟨s • (x : M), by
obtain ⟨x, a, h⟩ := x
use a
dsimp
rw [smul_comm, h, smul_zero]⟩⟩
instance : DistribMulAction S (torsion' R M S) :=
Subtype.coe_injective.distribMulAction (torsion' R M S).subtype.toAddMonoidHom fun (_ : S) _ =>
rfl
instance : SMulCommClass S R (torsion' R M S) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext <| smul_comm _ _ _⟩
/-- An `S`-torsion module is a module whose `S`-torsion submodule is the full space. -/
theorem isTorsion'_iff_torsion'_eq_top : IsTorsion' M S ↔ torsion' R M S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => eq_top_iff.mpr fun _ _ => @h _, fun h x => by
rw [← @mem_torsion'_iff R, h]
trivial⟩
/-- The `S`-torsion submodule is an `S`-torsion module. -/
theorem torsion'_isTorsion' : IsTorsion' (torsion' R M S) S := fun ⟨_, ⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨a, Subtype.ext h⟩
@[simp]
theorem torsion'_torsion'_eq_top : torsion' R (torsion' R M S) S = ⊤ :=
(isTorsion'_iff_torsion'_eq_top S).mp <| torsion'_isTorsion' S
/-- The torsion submodule of the torsion submodule (viewed as a module) is the full
torsion module. -/
theorem torsion_torsion_eq_top : torsion R (torsion R M) = ⊤ :=
torsion'_torsion'_eq_top R⁰
/-- The torsion submodule is always a torsion module. -/
theorem torsion_isTorsion : Module.IsTorsion R (torsion R M) :=
torsion'_isTorsion' R⁰
end Torsion'
section Torsion
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (R M)
theorem _root_.Module.isTorsionBySet_annihilator_top :
Module.IsTorsionBySet R M (⊤ : Submodule R M).annihilator := fun x ha =>
mem_annihilator.mp ha.prop x mem_top
variable {R M}
theorem _root_.Submodule.annihilator_top_inter_nonZeroDivisors [Module.Finite R M]
(hM : Module.IsTorsion R M) : ((⊤ : Submodule R M).annihilator : Set R) ∩ R⁰ ≠ ∅ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := ‹Module.Finite R M›.fg_top
refine Set.Nonempty.ne_empty ⟨_, ?_, (∏ x ∈ S, (@hM x).choose : R⁰).prop⟩
rw [Submonoid.coe_finset_prod, SetLike.mem_coe, ← hS, mem_annihilator_span]
intro n
letI := Classical.decEq M
rw [← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ n.prop, mul_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def, (@hM n).choose_spec,
smul_zero]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R]
theorem coe_torsion_eq_annihilator_ne_bot :
(torsion R M : Set M) = { x : M | (R ∙ x).annihilator ≠ ⊥ } := by
ext x; simp_rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff, mem_annihilator, mem_span_singleton]
| exact
⟨fun ⟨a, hax⟩ =>
⟨a, fun _ ⟨b, hb⟩ => by rw [← hb, smul_comm, ← Submonoid.smul_def, hax, smul_zero],
nonZeroDivisors.coe_ne_zero _⟩,
fun ⟨a, hax, ha⟩ => ⟨⟨_, mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero ha⟩, hax x ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩⟩⟩
/-- A module over a domain has `NoZeroSMulDivisors` iff its torsion submodule is trivial. -/
theorem noZeroSMulDivisors_iff_torsion_eq_bot : NoZeroSMulDivisors R M ↔ torsion R M = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Torsion.lean | 752 | 760 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (k * i) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (i * k) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (k * j) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (j * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a m = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_left {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd m = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right a m n
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a n = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_right {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd n = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right a n m
theorem gcd_eq_left {i j : ℤ} (H : i ∣ j) : gcd i j = natAbs i :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H))
theorem gcd_eq_right {i j : ℤ} (H : j ∣ i) : gcd i j = natAbs j := by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
theorem ne_zero_of_gcd {x y : ℤ} (hc : gcd x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
rw [hc.left, hc.right, gcd_zero_right, natAbs_zero]
theorem exists_gcd_one {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n' : ℤ, gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd H, (Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_left).symm,
(Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_right).symm⟩
theorem exists_gcd_one' {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ (g : ℕ) (m' n' : ℤ), 0 < g ∧ gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_gcd_one H
⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {m n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) : m ^ k ∣ n ^ k ↔ m ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rwa [← natAbs_dvd_natAbs, ← Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff k0, ← Int.natAbs_pow, ← Int.natAbs_pow,
natAbs_dvd_natAbs]
theorem gcd_dvd_iff {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : gcd a b ∣ n ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, Int.ofNat_mul, gcd_eq_gcd_ab, Int.add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, h]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_left _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right y)
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℤ} (hd_pos : 0 ≤ d) (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℤ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = gcd a b :=
dvd_antisymm hd_pos (ofNat_zero_le (gcd a b)) (dvd_coe_gcd hda hdb)
(hd _ gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a c = 1` then `a ∣ b`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a c = 1) :
a ∣ b := by
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab a c
simp only [hab, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add] at this
have : b * a * gcdA a c + b * c * gcdB a c = b := by simp [mul_assoc, ← Int.mul_add, ← this]
rw [← this]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left a b) _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left habc _)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a b = 1` then `a ∣ c`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a b = 1) :
a ∣ c := by
rw [mul_comm] at habc
exact dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one habc hab
/-- For nonzero integers `a` and `b`, `gcd a b` is the smallest positive natural number that can be
written in the form `a * x + b * y` for some pair of integers `x` and `y` -/
theorem gcd_least_linear {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsLeast { n : ℕ | 0 < n ∧ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y } (a.gcd b) := by
simp_rw [← gcd_dvd_iff]
constructor
· simpa [and_true, dvd_refl, Set.mem_setOf_eq] using gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left b ha
· simp only [lowerBounds, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun n hn_pos hn => Nat.le_of_dvd hn_pos hn
/-! ### lcm -/
theorem lcm_comm (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = lcm j i := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm]
exact Nat.lcm_comm _ _
theorem lcm_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : lcm (lcm i j) k = lcm i (lcm j k) := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]
apply Nat.lcm_assoc
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 0 i = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 0 = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 1 i = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 1 = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_right
theorem coe_lcm_dvd {i j k : ℤ} : i ∣ k → j ∣ k → (lcm i j : ℤ) ∣ k := by
rw [Int.lcm]
intro hi hj
exact natCast_dvd.mpr (Nat.lcm_dvd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hi) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hj))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias lcm_dvd := coe_lcm_dvd
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = natAbs m * n.lcm k := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * natAbs n := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_right]
end Int
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_gcd_eq_one {M : Type*} [Monoid M] (x : M) {m n : ℕ} (hm : x ^ m = 1) (hn : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m.gcd n = 1 := by
rcases m with (rfl | m); · simp [hn]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := IsUnit.of_pow_eq_one hm m.succ_ne_zero
rw [← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, ← Units.val_one (α := M), ← zpow_natCast, ← Units.ext_iff] at *
rw [Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, hn, hm, one_zpow, one_zpow, one_mul]
variable {α : Type*}
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
protected lemma Commute.pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime (hab : Commute a b) (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
a ^ m = b ^ n ↔ ∃ c, a = c ^ n ∧ b = c ^ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩; rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul']⟩
by_cases m = 0; · aesop
by_cases n = 0; · aesop
by_cases hb : b = 0; · exact ⟨0, by aesop⟩
by_cases ha : a = 0; · exact ⟨0, by have := h.symm; aesop⟩
refine ⟨a ^ Nat.gcdB m n * b ^ Nat.gcdA m n, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· refine (pow_one _).symm.trans ?_
conv_lhs => rw [← zpow_natCast, ← hmn, Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab]
simp only [zpow_add₀ ha, zpow_add₀ hb, ← zpow_natCast, (hab.zpow_zpow₀ _ _).mul_zpow,
← zpow_mul, mul_comm (Nat.gcdB m n), mul_comm (Nat.gcdA m n)]
simp only [zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, h]
exact ((Commute.pow_pow (by aesop) _ _).zpow_zpow₀ _ _).symm
end GroupWithZero
section CommGroupWithZero
variable [CommGroupWithZero α] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime (hmn : m.Coprime n) : a ^ m = b ^ n ↔ ∃ c, a = c ^ n ∧ b = c ^ m :=
(Commute.all _ _).pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime hmn
lemma pow_mem_range_pow_of_coprime (hmn : m.Coprime n) (a : α) :
a ^ m ∈ Set.range (· ^ n : α → α) ↔ a ∈ Set.range (· ^ n : α → α) := by
simp [pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime hmn.symm]; aesop
end CommGroupWithZero
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 448 | 449 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
| ext ⟨x, y⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 122 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
The fact that the real numbers are a (trivial) *-ring has similarly been deferred to
`Mathlib/Data/Real/Star.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
theorem ofCauchy_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_inv {f} : (⟨f⁻¹⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨f⟩⁻¹ :=
show _ = inv' _ by rw [inv']
theorem cauchy_zero : (0 : ℝ).cauchy = 0 :=
show zero.cauchy = 0 by rw [zero_def]
theorem cauchy_one : (1 : ℝ).cauchy = 1 :=
show one.cauchy = 1 by rw [one_def]
theorem cauchy_add : ∀ a b, (a + b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy + b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (add _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [add_def]
theorem cauchy_neg : ∀ a, (-a : ℝ).cauchy = -a.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩ => show (neg _).cauchy = _ by rw [neg_def]
theorem cauchy_mul : ∀ a b, (a * b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy * b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (mul _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [mul_def]
theorem cauchy_sub : ∀ a b, (a - b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy - b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← cauchy_neg, ← cauchy_add]
rfl
theorem cauchy_inv : ∀ f, (f⁻¹ : ℝ).cauchy = f.cauchy⁻¹
| ⟨f⟩ => show (inv' _).cauchy = _ by rw [inv']
instance instNatCast : NatCast ℝ where natCast n := ⟨n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast ℝ where intCast z := ⟨z⟩
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℝ where nnratCast q := ⟨q⟩
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℝ where ratCast q := ⟨q⟩
lemma ofCauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : ℝ) = n := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : ℝ) = z := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ).cauchy = n := rfl
lemma cauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : ℝ).cauchy = z := rfl
lemma cauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
instance commRing : CommRing ℝ where
natCast n := ⟨n⟩
intCast z := ⟨z⟩
zero := (0 : ℝ)
one := (1 : ℝ)
mul := (· * ·)
add := (· + ·)
neg := @Neg.neg ℝ _
sub := @Sub.sub ℝ _
npow := @npowRec ℝ ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
nsmul := @nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨@Neg.neg ℝ _⟩ (@nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
zero_add a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
add_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_comm]
add_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_assoc]
mul_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
zero_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
mul_one a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
one_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
mul_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_comm]
mul_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_assoc]
left_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, mul_add]
right_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, add_mul]
neg_add_cancel a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_neg, cauchy_zero]
natCast_zero := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_zero]
natCast_succ n := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_one, cauchy_add]
intCast_negSucc z := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_neg, cauchy_natCast]
/-- `Real.equivCauchy` as a ring equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def ringEquivCauchy : ℝ ≃+* CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
{ equivCauchy with
toFun := cauchy
invFun := ofCauchy
map_add' := cauchy_add
map_mul' := cauchy_mul }
/-! Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution.
These short-circuits have an additional property of ensuring that a computable path is found; if
`Field ℝ` is found first, then decaying it to these typeclasses would result in a `noncomputable`
version of them. -/
instance instRing : Ring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : MonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddLeftCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddRightCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Inhabited ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Make a real number from a Cauchy sequence of rationals (by taking the equivalence class). -/
def mk (x : CauSeq ℚ abs) : ℝ :=
⟨CauSeq.Completion.mk x⟩
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
ext_cauchy_iff.trans CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
private irreducible_def lt : ℝ → ℝ → Prop
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ =>
(Quotient.liftOn₂ x y (· < ·)) fun _ _ _ _ hf hg =>
propext <|
⟨fun h => lt_of_eq_of_lt (Setoid.symm hf) (lt_of_lt_of_eq h hg), fun h =>
lt_of_eq_of_lt hf (lt_of_lt_of_eq h (Setoid.symm hg))⟩
instance : LT ℝ :=
⟨lt⟩
theorem lt_cauchy {f g} : (⟨⟦f⟧⟩ : ℝ) < ⟨⟦g⟧⟩ ↔ f < g :=
show lt _ _ ↔ _ by rw [lt_def]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f < mk g ↔ f < g :=
lt_cauchy
theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = 0 := by rw [← ofCauchy_zero]; rfl
theorem mk_one : mk 1 = 1 := by rw [← ofCauchy_one]; rfl
theorem mk_add {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f + g) = mk f + mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_add]
theorem mk_mul {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f * g) = mk f * mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_mul]
theorem mk_neg {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (-f) = -mk f := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mk_pos {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : 0 < mk f ↔ Pos f := by
rw [← mk_zero, mk_lt]
exact iff_of_eq (congr_arg Pos (sub_zero f))
lemma mk_const {x : ℚ} : mk (const abs x) = x := rfl
private irreducible_def le (x y : ℝ) : Prop :=
x < y ∨ x = y
instance : LE ℝ :=
⟨le⟩
private theorem le_def' {x y : ℝ} : x ≤ y ↔ x < y ∨ x = y :=
iff_of_eq <| le_def _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_le {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f ≤ mk g ↔ f ≤ g := by
simp only [le_def', mk_lt, mk_eq]; rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind_mk {C : Real → Prop} (x : Real) (h : ∀ y, C (mk y)) : C x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Quot.induction_on
exact h _
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {a b : ℝ} (c : ℝ) : c + a < c + b ↔ a < b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp only [mk_lt, ← mk_add]
show Pos _ ↔ Pos _; rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder ℝ where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa using lt_iff_le_not_le
le_refl a := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
rw [mk_le]
le_trans a b c := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simpa using le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa [mk_eq] using CauSeq.le_antisymm
instance : Preorder ℝ := by infer_instance
theorem ratCast_lt {x y : ℚ} : (x : ℝ) < (y : ℝ) ↔ x < y := by
rw [← mk_const, ← mk_const, mk_lt]
exact const_lt
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1 := by
convert ratCast_lt.2 zero_lt_one <;> simp [← ofCauchy_ratCast, ofCauchy_one, ofCauchy_zero]
protected theorem fact_zero_lt_one : Fact ((0 : ℝ) < 1) :=
⟨Real.zero_lt_one⟩
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℝ where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, Real.zero_lt_one.ne⟩
instance instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℝ where
zero_le_one := le_of_lt Real.zero_lt_one
instance instIsOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid ℝ where
add_le_add_left := by
simp only [le_iff_eq_or_lt]
rintro a b ⟨rfl, h⟩
· simp only [lt_self_iff_false, or_false, forall_const]
· exact fun c => Or.inr ((add_lt_add_iff_left c).2 ‹_›)
instance instIsStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing ℝ :=
.of_mul_pos fun a b ↦ by
induction' a using Real.ind_mk with a
induction' b using Real.ind_mk with b
simpa only [mk_lt, mk_pos, ← mk_mul] using CauSeq.mul_pos
instance instIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid ℝ :=
inferInstance
private irreducible_def sup : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊔ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => sup_equiv_sup hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Max ℝ :=
⟨sup⟩
theorem ofCauchy_sup (a b) : (⟨⟦a ⊔ b⟧⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨⟦a⟧⟩ ⊔ ⟨⟦b⟧⟩ :=
show _ = sup _ _ by
rw [sup_def]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sup (a b) : (mk (a ⊔ b) : ℝ) = mk a ⊔ mk b :=
ofCauchy_sup _ _
private irreducible_def inf : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊓ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => inf_equiv_inf hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Min ℝ :=
⟨inf⟩
theorem ofCauchy_inf (a b) : (⟨⟦a ⊓ b⟧⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨⟦a⟧⟩ ⊓ ⟨⟦b⟧⟩ :=
show _ = inf _ _ by
rw [inf_def]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf (a b) : (mk (a ⊓ b) : ℝ) = mk a ⊓ mk b :=
ofCauchy_inf _ _
instance : DistribLattice ℝ :=
{ Real.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_sup_left := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_sup_left
le_sup_right := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_sup_right
sup_le := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp_rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.sup_le
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.inf_le_left
inf_le_right := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.inf_le_right
le_inf := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp_rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_inf
le_sup_inf := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
apply Eq.le
simp only [← mk_sup, ← mk_inf]
exact congr_arg mk (CauSeq.sup_inf_distrib_left ..).symm }
-- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
instance lattice : Lattice ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance : SemilatticeInf ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance : SemilatticeSup ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance leTotal_R : IsTotal ℝ (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa using CauSeq.le_total ..⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder ℝ :=
Lattice.toLinearOrder ℝ
instance : IsDomain ℝ := IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain
noncomputable instance instDivInvMonoid : DivInvMonoid ℝ where
lemma ofCauchy_div (f g) : (⟨f / g⟩ : ℝ) = (⟨f⟩ : ℝ) / (⟨g⟩ : ℝ) := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ofCauchy_mul, ofCauchy_inv]
noncomputable instance field : Field ℝ where
mul_inv_cancel := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ h
rw [mul_comm]
simp only [← ofCauchy_inv, ← ofCauchy_mul, ← ofCauchy_one, ← ofCauchy_zero,
Ne, ofCauchy.injEq] at *
exact CauSeq.Completion.inv_mul_cancel h
inv_zero := by simp [← ofCauchy_zero, ← ofCauchy_inv]
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
nnratCast_def q := by
rw [← ofCauchy_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, ofCauchy_div, ofCauchy_natCast, ofCauchy_natCast]
ratCast_def q := by
rw [← ofCauchy_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, ofCauchy_div, ofCauchy_natCast, ofCauchy_intCast]
-- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
noncomputable instance : DivisionRing ℝ := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableLT (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a < b) := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableLE (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a ≤ b) := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableEq (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a = b) := by infer_instance
/-- Show an underlying cauchy sequence for real numbers.
The representative chosen is the one passed in the VM to `Quot.mk`, so two cauchy sequences
converging to the same number may be printed differently.
-/
unsafe instance : Repr ℝ where
reprPrec r p := Repr.addAppParen ("Real.ofCauchy " ++ repr r.cauchy) p
theorem le_mk_of_forall_le {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, x ≤ f j) → x ≤ mk f := by
intro h
induction x using Real.ind_mk
apply le_of_not_lt
rw [mk_lt]
rintro ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
obtain ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and h (exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos K0))
apply not_lt_of_le (H _ le_rfl).1
rw [← mk_const, mk_lt]
refine ⟨_, half_pos K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩
have := add_le_add (H _ ij).2.1 (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| (H _ le_rfl).2.2 _ ij).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two, sub_apply, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this
theorem mk_le_of_forall_le {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} {x : ℝ} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, (f j : ℝ) ≤ x) :
mk f ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, H⟩ := h
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← mk_neg]
exact le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨i, fun j ij => by simp [H _ ij]⟩
theorem mk_near_of_forall_near {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} {x : ℝ} {ε : ℝ}
(H : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| ≤ ε) : |mk f - x| ≤ ε :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <|
mk_le_of_forall_le <|
H.imp fun _ h j ij => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 <| h j ij).1,
sub_le_comm.1 <|
le_mk_of_forall_le <| H.imp fun _ h j ij => sub_le_comm.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 <| h j ij).2⟩
lemma mul_add_one_le_add_one_pow {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b : ℕ) : a * b + 1 ≤ (a + 1) ^ b := by
rcases ha.eq_or_lt with rfl | ha'
· simp
clear ha
induction b generalizing a with
| zero => simp
| succ b hb =>
calc
a * ↑(b + 1) + 1 = (0 + 1) ^ b * a + (a * b + 1) := by
simp [mul_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
_ ≤ (a + 1) ^ b * a + (a + 1) ^ b := by
gcongr
· norm_num
· exact hb ha'
_ = (a + 1) ^ (b + 1) := by simp [pow_succ, mul_add]
end Real
/-- A function `f : R → ℝ` is power-multiplicative if for all `r ∈ R` and all positive `n ∈ ℕ`,
`f (r ^ n) = (f r) ^ n`. -/
def IsPowMul {R : Type*} [Pow R ℕ] (f : R → ℝ) :=
∀ (a : R) {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ n → f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : α →+* β` is bounded with respect to the functions `nα : α → ℝ` and
`nβ : β → ℝ` if there exists a positive constant `C` such that for all `x` in `α`,
`nβ (f x) ≤ C * nα x`. -/
def RingHom.IsBoundedWrt {α : Type*} [Ring α] {β : Type*} [Ring β] (nα : α → ℝ) (nβ : β → ℝ)
(f : α →+* β) : Prop :=
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x : α, nβ (f x) ≤ C * nα x
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 605 | 616 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.