Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Opposite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
/-!
# The base change of a clifford algebra
In this file we show the isomorphism
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivBaseChange A Q` :
`CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A) ≃ₐ[A] (A ⊗[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)`
with forward direction `CliffordAlgebra.toBasechange A Q` and reverse direction
`CliffordAlgebra.ofBasechange A Q`.
This covers a more general case of the complexification of clifford algebras (as described in §2.2
of https://empg.maths.ed.ac.uk/Activities/Spin/Lecture2.pdf), where ℂ and ℝ are replaced by an
`R`-algebra `A` (where `2 : R` is invertible).
We show the additional results:
* `CliffordAlgebra.toBasechange_ι`: the effect of base-changing pure vectors.
* `CliffordAlgebra.ofBasechange_tmul_ι`: the effect of un-base-changing a tensor of a pure vectors.
* `CliffordAlgebra.toBasechange_involute`: the effect of base-changing an involution.
* `CliffordAlgebra.toBasechange_reverse`: the effect of base-changing a reversal.
-/
variable {R A V : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [AddCommGroup V]
variable [Algebra R A] [Module R V]
variable [Invertible (2 : R)]
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable (A)
/-- Auxiliary construction: note this is really just a heterobasic `CliffordAlgebra.map`. -/
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
noncomputable def ofBaseChangeAux (Q : QuadraticForm R V) :
CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A) :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q <| by
refine ⟨(ι (Q.baseChange A)).restrictScalars R ∘ₗ TensorProduct.mk R A V 1, fun v => ?_⟩
refine (CliffordAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ v)).trans ?_
rw [QuadraticForm.baseChange_tmul, one_mul, ← Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one,
← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
@[simp] theorem ofBaseChangeAux_ι (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (v : V) :
ofBaseChangeAux A Q (ι Q v) = ι (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ v) :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _ v
/-- Convert from the base-changed clifford algebra to the clifford algebra over a base-changed
module. -/
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
noncomputable def ofBaseChange (Q : QuadraticForm R V) :
A ⊗[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[A] CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A) :=
Algebra.TensorProduct.lift (Algebra.ofId _ _) (ofBaseChangeAux A Q)
fun _a _x => Algebra.commutes _ _
@[simp] theorem ofBaseChange_tmul_ι (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (z : A) (v : V) :
ofBaseChange A Q (z ⊗ₜ ι Q v) = ι (Q.baseChange A) (z ⊗ₜ v) := by
show algebraMap _ _ z * ofBaseChangeAux A Q (ι Q v) = ι (Q.baseChange A) (z ⊗ₜ[R] v)
rw [ofBaseChangeAux_ι, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← map_smul, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul,
mul_one]
@[simp] theorem ofBaseChange_tmul_one (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (z : A) :
ofBaseChange A Q (z ⊗ₜ 1) = algebraMap _ _ z := by
show algebraMap _ _ z * ofBaseChangeAux A Q 1 = _
rw [map_one, mul_one]
/-- Convert from the clifford algebra over a base-changed module to the base-changed clifford
algebra. -/
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
noncomputable def toBaseChange (Q : QuadraticForm R V) :
CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A) →ₐ[A] A ⊗[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift _ <| by
refine ⟨TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) (ι Q), ?_⟩
letI : Invertible (2 : A) := (Invertible.map (algebraMap R A) 2).copy 2 (map_ofNat _ _).symm
letI : Invertible (2 : A ⊗[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
(Invertible.map (algebraMap R _) 2).copy 2 (map_ofNat _ _).symm
suffices hpure_tensor : ∀ v w, (1 * 1) ⊗ₜ[R] (ι Q v * ι Q w) + (1 * 1) ⊗ₜ[R] (ι Q w * ι Q v) =
QuadraticMap.polarBilin (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] v) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] w) ⊗ₜ[R] 1 by
-- the crux is that by converting to a statement about linear maps instead of quadratic forms,
-- we then have access to all the partially-applied `ext` lemmas.
rw [CliffordAlgebra.forall_mul_self_eq_iff (isUnit_of_invertible _)]
refine TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.curry_injective ?_
ext v w
dsimp
exact hpure_tensor v w
intros v w
rw [← TensorProduct.tmul_add, CliffordAlgebra.ι_mul_ι_add_swap,
QuadraticForm.polarBilin_baseChange, LinearMap.BilinForm.baseChange_tmul, one_mul,
TensorProduct.smul_tmul, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, QuadraticMap.polarBilin_apply_apply]
@[simp] theorem toBaseChange_ι (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (z : A) (v : V) :
toBaseChange A Q (ι (Q.baseChange A) (z ⊗ₜ v)) = z ⊗ₜ ι Q v :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _ _
theorem toBaseChange_comp_involute (Q : QuadraticForm R V) :
(toBaseChange A Q).comp (involute : CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A) →ₐ[A] _) =
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map (AlgHom.id _ _) involute).comp (toBaseChange A Q) := by
ext v
show toBaseChange A Q (involute (ι (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] v)))
= (Algebra.TensorProduct.map (AlgHom.id _ _) involute :
A ⊗[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[A] _)
(toBaseChange A Q (ι (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] v)))
rw [toBaseChange_ι, involute_ι, map_neg (toBaseChange A Q), toBaseChange_ι,
Algebra.TensorProduct.map_tmul, AlgHom.id_apply, involute_ι, TensorProduct.tmul_neg]
/-- The involution acts only on the right of the tensor product. -/
theorem toBaseChange_involute (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (x : CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A)) :
toBaseChange A Q (involute x) =
TensorProduct.map LinearMap.id (involute.toLinearMap) (toBaseChange A Q x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (toBaseChange_comp_involute A Q) x
open MulOpposite
/-- Auxiliary theorem used to prove `toBaseChange_reverse` without needing induction. -/
theorem toBaseChange_comp_reverseOp (Q : QuadraticForm R V) :
(toBaseChange A Q).op.comp reverseOp =
((Algebra.TensorProduct.opAlgEquiv R A A (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toAlgHom.comp <|
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map
(AlgEquiv.toOpposite A A).toAlgHom (reverseOp (Q := Q))).comp
(toBaseChange A Q)) := by
ext v
show op (toBaseChange A Q (reverse (ι (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] v)))) =
Algebra.TensorProduct.opAlgEquiv R A A (CliffordAlgebra Q)
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map (AlgEquiv.toOpposite A A).toAlgHom (reverseOp (Q := Q))
(toBaseChange A Q (ι (Q.baseChange A) (1 ⊗ₜ[R] v))))
rw [toBaseChange_ι, reverse_ι, toBaseChange_ι, Algebra.TensorProduct.map_tmul,
Algebra.TensorProduct.opAlgEquiv_tmul, reverseOp_ι]
rfl
/-- `reverse` acts only on the right of the tensor product. -/
| theorem toBaseChange_reverse (Q : QuadraticForm R V) (x : CliffordAlgebra (Q.baseChange A)) :
toBaseChange A Q (reverse x) =
TensorProduct.map LinearMap.id reverse (toBaseChange A Q x) := by
have := DFunLike.congr_fun (toBaseChange_comp_reverseOp A Q) x
refine (congr_arg unop this).trans ?_; clear this
refine (LinearMap.congr_fun (TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.map_comp _ _ _ _).symm _).trans ?_
rw [reverse, ← AlgEquiv.toLinearMap, ← AlgEquiv.toLinearEquiv_toLinearMap,
AlgEquiv.toLinearEquiv_toOpposite]
dsimp
-- `simp` fails here due to a timeout looking for a `Subsingleton` instance!?
rw [LinearEquiv.self_trans_symm]
rfl
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/BaseChange.lean | 141 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
|
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,031 | 1,033 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
We define `ENNReal = ℝ≥0∞ := WithTop ℝ≥0` to be the type of extended nonnegative real numbers,
i.e., the interval `[0, +∞]`. This type is used as the codomain of a `MeasureTheory.Measure`,
and of the extended distance `edist` in an `EMetricSpace`.
In this file we set up many of the instances on `ℝ≥0∞`, and provide relationships between `ℝ≥0∞` and
`ℝ≥0`, and between `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ`. In particular, we provide a coercion from `ℝ≥0` to `ℝ≥0∞` as well
as functions `ENNReal.toNNReal`, `ENNReal.ofReal` and `ENNReal.toReal`, all of which take the value
zero wherever they cannot be the identity. Also included is the relationship between `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℕ`.
The interaction of these functions, especially `ENNReal.ofReal` and `ENNReal.toReal`, with the
algebraic and lattice structure can be found in `Data.ENNReal.Real`.
This file proves many of the order properties of `ℝ≥0∞`, with the exception of the ways those relate
to the algebraic structure, which are included in `Data.ENNReal.Operations`.
This file also defines inversion and division: this includes `Inv` and `Div` instances on `ℝ≥0∞`
making it into a `DivInvOneMonoid`.
As a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation with integer
exponent: this and other properties is shown in `Data.ENNReal.Inv`.
## Main definitions
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the extended nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞]`; defined as `WithTop ℝ≥0`; it is
equipped with the following structures:
- coercion from `ℝ≥0` defined in the natural way;
- the natural structure of a complete dense linear order: `↑p ≤ ↑q ↔ p ≤ q` and `∀ a, a ≤ ∞`;
- `a + b` is defined so that `↑p + ↑q = ↑(p + q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)` and `a + ∞ = ∞ + a = ∞`;
- `a * b` is defined so that `↑p * ↑q = ↑(p * q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)`, `0 * ∞ = ∞ * 0 = 0`, and
`a * ∞ = ∞ * a = ∞` for `a ≠ 0`;
- `a - b` is defined as the minimal `d` such that `a ≤ d + b`; this way we have
`↑p - ↑q = ↑(p - q)`, `∞ - ↑p = ∞`, `↑p - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ = 0`; note that there is no negation, only
subtraction;
The addition and multiplication defined this way together with `0 = ↑0` and `1 = ↑1` turn
`ℝ≥0∞` into a canonically ordered commutative semiring of characteristic zero.
- `a⁻¹` is defined as `Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}`. This way we have `(↑p)⁻¹ = ↑(p⁻¹)` for
`p : ℝ≥0`, `p ≠ 0`, `0⁻¹ = ∞`, and `∞⁻¹ = 0`.
- `a / b` is defined as `a * b⁻¹`.
This inversion and division include `Inv` and `Div` instances on `ℝ≥0∞`,
making it into a `DivInvOneMonoid`. Further properties of these are shown in `Data.ENNReal.Inv`.
* Coercions to/from other types:
- coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` is defined as `Coe`, so one can use `(p : ℝ≥0)` in a context that
expects `a : ℝ≥0∞`, and Lean will apply `coe` automatically;
- `ENNReal.toNNReal` sends `↑p` to `p` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ENNReal.toReal := coe ∘ ENNReal.toNNReal` sends `↑p`, `p : ℝ≥0` to `(↑p : ℝ)` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ENNReal.ofReal := coe ∘ Real.toNNReal` sends `x : ℝ` to `↑⟨max x 0, _⟩`
- `ENNReal.neTopEquivNNReal` is an equivalence between `{a : ℝ≥0∞ // a ≠ 0}` and `ℝ≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We define a `CanLift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0` instance, so one of the ways to prove theorems about an `ℝ≥0∞`
number `a` is to consider the cases `a = ∞` and `a ≠ ∞`, and use the tactic `lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha`
in the second case. This instance is even more useful if one already has `ha : a ≠ ∞` in the
context, or if we have `(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞)`.
## Notations
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the type of the extended nonnegative real numbers;
* `ℝ≥0`: the type of nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞)`; defined in `Data.Real.NNReal`;
* `∞`: a localized notation in `ENNReal` for `⊤ : ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Function Set NNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
def ENNReal := WithTop ℝ≥0
deriving Zero, Top, AddCommMonoidWithOne, SemilatticeSup, DistribLattice, Nontrivial
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ENNReal] notation "ℝ≥0∞" => ENNReal
/-- Notation for infinity as an `ENNReal` number. -/
scoped[ENNReal] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ENNReal)
namespace ENNReal
instance : OrderBot ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : OrderTop ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderTop (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : BoundedOrder ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (BoundedOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : CharZero ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (CharZero (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : Min ℝ≥0∞ := SemilatticeInf.toMin
instance : Max ℝ≥0∞ := SemilatticeSup.toMax
noncomputable instance : CommSemiring ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : PartialOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : IsOrderedRing ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedRing (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : NoZeroDivisors ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (NoZeroDivisors (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (DenselyOrdered (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : IsOrderedAddMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedAddMonoid (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance instSub : Sub ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (Sub (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : OrderedSub ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop (WithTop ℝ≥0))
-- RFC: redefine using pattern matching?
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨fun a => sInf { b | 1 ≤ a * b }⟩
noncomputable instance : DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
-- TODO: add a `WithTop` instance and use it here
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop ℝ≥0∞),
inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring ℝ≥0∞) with
bot_le _ := bot_le
mul_le_mul_left := fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_left'
zero_le_one := zero_le 1 }
instance : Unique (AddUnits ℝ≥0∞) where
default := 0
uniq a := AddUnits.ext <| le_zero_iff.1 <| by rw [← a.add_neg]; exact le_self_add
instance : Inhabited ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨0⟩
/-- Coercion from `ℝ≥0` to `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[coe, match_pattern] def ofNNReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := WithTop.some
instance : Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨ofNNReal⟩
/-- A version of `WithTop.recTopCoe` that uses `ENNReal.ofNNReal`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
def recTopCoe {C : ℝ≥0∞ → Sort*} (top : C ∞) (coe : ∀ x : ℝ≥0, C x) (x : ℝ≥0∞) : C x :=
WithTop.recTopCoe top coe x
instance canLift : CanLift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0 ofNNReal (· ≠ ∞) := WithTop.canLift
@[simp] theorem none_eq_top : (none : ℝ≥0∞) = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] theorem some_eq_coe (a : ℝ≥0) : (Option.some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] theorem some_eq_coe' (a : ℝ≥0) : (WithTop.some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
lemma coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) := WithTop.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj : (p : ℝ≥0∞) = q ↔ p = q := coe_injective.eq_iff
lemma coe_ne_coe : (p : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ q ↔ p ≠ q := coe_inj.not
theorem range_coe' : range ofNNReal = Iio ∞ := WithTop.range_coe
theorem range_coe : range ofNNReal = {∞}ᶜ := (isCompl_range_some_none ℝ≥0).symm.compl_eq.symm
instance : NNRatCast ℝ≥0∞ where
nnratCast r := ofNNReal r
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(q : ℝ≥0) = (q : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
/-- `toNNReal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def toNNReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0 := WithTop.untopD 0
/-- `toReal x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def toReal (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Real := a.toNNReal
/-- `ofReal x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def ofReal (r : Real) : ℝ≥0∞ := r.toNNReal
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma toNNReal_coe (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = r := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNNReal : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑a.toNNReal = a
| ofNNReal _, _ => rfl
| ⊤, h => (h rfl).elim
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_toNNReal_comp {ι : Type*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞) :
(fun (x : ℝ≥0) => (x : ℝ≥0∞)) ∘ ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f = f := by
ext x
simp [coe_toNNReal (hf x)]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ENNReal.ofReal a.toReal = a := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal, ENNReal.ofReal, h]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_ofReal {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : (ENNReal.ofReal r).toReal = r :=
max_eq_left h
theorem toReal_ofReal' {r : ℝ} : (ENNReal.ofReal r).toReal = max r 0 := rfl
theorem coe_toNNReal_le_self : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞}, ↑a.toNNReal ≤ a
| ofNNReal r => by rw [toNNReal_coe]
| ⊤ => le_top
theorem coe_nnreal_eq (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofReal r := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ENNReal.ofReal x = ofNNReal ⟨x, h⟩ :=
(coe_nnreal_eq ⟨x, h⟩).symm
theorem ofNNReal_toNNReal (x : ℝ) : (Real.toNNReal x : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofReal x := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofReal_coe_nnreal : ENNReal.ofReal p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ≥0) = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ≥0) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] theorem toReal_nonneg {a : ℝ≥0∞} : 0 ≤ a.toReal := a.toNNReal.2
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_toNNReal_eq_toReal (z : ℝ≥0∞) : (z.toNNReal : ℝ) = z.toReal := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_toReal_eq (z : ℝ≥0∞) : z.toReal.toNNReal = z.toNNReal := by
ext; simp [coe_toNNReal_eq_toReal]
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_top : ∞.toNNReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias top_toNNReal := toNNReal_top
@[simp] theorem toReal_top : ∞.toReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias top_toReal := toReal_top
@[simp] theorem toReal_one : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 1 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias one_toReal := toReal_one
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_one : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = 1 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias one_toNNReal := toNNReal_one
@[simp] theorem coe_toReal (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = r := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias zero_toNNReal := toNNReal_zero
@[simp] theorem toReal_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias zero_toReal := toReal_zero
@[simp] theorem ofReal_zero : ENNReal.ofReal (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[simp] theorem ofReal_one : ENNReal.ofReal (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} : ENNReal.ofReal a.toReal ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (ofReal_toReal ha)
theorem forall_ennreal {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a, p a) ↔ (∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
Option.forall.trans and_comm
theorem forall_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a, a ≠ ∞ → p a) ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
Option.forall_ne_none
theorem exists_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∃ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
Option.exists_ne_none
theorem toNNReal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toNNReal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toReal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toNNReal_ne_zero : a.toNNReal ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ a ≠ ∞ :=
a.toNNReal_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
theorem toReal_ne_zero : a.toReal ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ a ≠ ∞ :=
a.toReal_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
theorem toNNReal_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toNNReal = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
WithTop.untopD_eq_iff.trans <| by simp
theorem toReal_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toReal = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal, NNReal.coe_eq_one, ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_one_iff]
theorem toNNReal_ne_one : a.toNNReal ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
a.toNNReal_eq_one_iff.not
theorem toReal_ne_one : a.toReal ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
a.toReal_eq_one_iff.not
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
theorem coe_ne_top : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := WithTop.coe_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_ne_coe : ∞ ≠ (r : ℝ≥0∞) := WithTop.top_ne_coe
@[simp] theorem coe_lt_top : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ := WithTop.coe_lt_top r
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
theorem ofReal_ne_top {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] theorem ofReal_lt_top {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r < ∞ := coe_lt_top
@[simp] theorem top_ne_ofReal {r : ℝ} : ∞ ≠ ENNReal.ofReal r := top_ne_coe
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_toReal_eq_iff : ENNReal.ofReal a.toReal = a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ofReal_ne_top, ofReal_toReal⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_ofReal_eq_iff {a : ℝ} : (ENNReal.ofReal a).toReal = a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact toReal_nonneg, toReal_ofReal⟩
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply] theorem zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_ne_zero : ∞ ≠ 0 := top_ne_coe
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply] theorem one_ne_top : 1 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_ne_one : ∞ ≠ 1 := top_ne_coe
@[simp] theorem zero_lt_top : 0 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_le_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑q ↔ r ≤ q := WithTop.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_lt_coe : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) < ↑q ↔ r < q := WithTop.coe_lt_coe
-- Needed until `@[gcongr]` accepts iff statements
alias ⟨_, coe_le_coe_of_le⟩ := coe_le_coe
attribute [gcongr] ENNReal.coe_le_coe_of_le
-- Needed until `@[gcongr]` accepts iff statements
alias ⟨_, coe_lt_coe_of_lt⟩ := coe_lt_coe
attribute [gcongr] ENNReal.coe_lt_coe_of_lt
theorem coe_mono : Monotone ofNNReal := fun _ _ => coe_le_coe.2
theorem coe_strictMono : StrictMono ofNNReal := fun _ _ => coe_lt_coe.2
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_eq_zero : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem zero_eq_coe : 0 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 = r := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_eq_one : (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem one_eq_coe : 1 = (↑r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 = r := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_pos : 0 < (r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 0 < r := coe_lt_coe
theorem coe_ne_zero : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 ↔ r ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
lemma coe_ne_one : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 1 ↔ r ≠ 1 := coe_eq_one.not
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (x y : ℝ≥0) : (↑(x + y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x + y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (x y : ℝ≥0) : (↑(x * y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x * y := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ≥0) : (↑(n • x) : ℝ≥0∞) = n • x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = ofNat(n) := rfl
-- TODO: add lemmas about `OfNat.ofNat` and `<`/`≤`
theorem coe_two : ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2 := rfl
theorem toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (x y : ℝ≥0∞) :
x.toNNReal = y.toNNReal ↔ x = y ∨ x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0 :=
WithTop.untopD_eq_untopD_iff
theorem toReal_eq_toReal_iff (x y : ℝ≥0∞) :
x.toReal = y.toReal ↔ x = y ∨ x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0 := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, NNReal.coe_inj, toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff]
theorem toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff' {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) :
x.toNNReal = y.toNNReal ↔ x = y := by
simp only [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff x y, hx, hy, and_false, false_and, or_false]
theorem toReal_eq_toReal_iff' {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) :
x.toReal = y.toReal ↔ x = y := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, NNReal.coe_inj, toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff' hx hy]
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) < 2 := Nat.one_lt_ofNat
/-- `(1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 1`, recorded as a `Fact` for use with `Lp` spaces. -/
instance _root_.fact_one_le_one_ennreal : Fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 1) :=
⟨le_rfl⟩
/-- `(1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 2`, recorded as a `Fact` for use with `Lp` spaces. -/
instance _root_.fact_one_le_two_ennreal : Fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 2) :=
⟨one_le_two⟩
/-- `(1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∞`, recorded as a `Fact` for use with `Lp` spaces. -/
instance _root_.fact_one_le_top_ennreal : Fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∞) :=
⟨le_top⟩
/-- The set of numbers in `ℝ≥0∞` that are not equal to `∞` is equivalent to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopEquivNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ ℝ≥0 where
toFun x := ENNReal.toNNReal x
invFun x := ⟨x, coe_ne_top⟩
left_inv := fun x => Subtype.eq <| coe_toNNReal x.2
right_inv := toNNReal_coe
theorem cinfi_ne_top [InfSet α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : ⨅ x : { x // x ≠ ∞ }, f x = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
Eq.symm <| neTopEquivNNReal.symm.surjective.iInf_congr _ fun _ => rfl
theorem iInf_ne_top [CompleteLattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) :
⨅ (x) (_ : x ≠ ∞), f x = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x := by rw [iInf_subtype', cinfi_ne_top]
theorem csupr_ne_top [SupSet α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) : ⨆ x : { x // x ≠ ∞ }, f x = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@cinfi_ne_top αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem iSup_ne_top [CompleteLattice α] (f : ℝ≥0∞ → α) :
⨆ (x) (_ : x ≠ ∞), f x = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@iInf_ne_top αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem iInf_ennreal {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
⨅ n, f n = (⨅ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊓ f ∞ :=
(iInf_option f).trans (inf_comm _ _)
theorem iSup_ennreal {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
⨆ n, f n = (⨆ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊔ f ∞ :=
@iInf_ennreal αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` as a `RingHom`. -/
def ofNNRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := some
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' _ _ := coe_mul _ _
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' _ _ := coe_add _ _
@[simp] theorem coe_ofNNRealHom : ⇑ofNNRealHom = some := rfl
section Order
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := rfl
-- `coe_lt_top` moved up
theorem not_top_le_coe : ¬∞ ≤ ↑r := WithTop.not_top_le_coe r
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_le_coe_iff : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ↑r ↔ 1 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_one_iff : ↑r ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ r ≤ 1 := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_one_iff : (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 ↔ p < 1 := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_lt_coe_iff : 1 < (↑p : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ 1 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ENNReal.ofReal n = n := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[simp] theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ENNReal.ofReal ofNat(n) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
theorem natCast_ne_top (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := WithTop.natCast_ne_top n
@[simp] theorem natCast_lt_top (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ := WithTop.natCast_lt_top n
@[simp, aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
lemma ofNat_ne_top {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) ≠ ∞ := natCast_ne_top n
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_top {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) < ∞ := natCast_lt_top n
@[simp] theorem top_ne_natCast (n : ℕ) : ∞ ≠ n := WithTop.top_ne_natCast n
@[simp] theorem top_ne_ofNat {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : ∞ ≠ ofNat(n) :=
ofNat_ne_top.symm
@[deprecated ofNat_ne_top (since := "2025-01-21")] lemma two_ne_top : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[deprecated ofNat_lt_top (since := "2025-01-21")] lemma two_lt_top : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ := coe_lt_top
@[simp] theorem one_lt_top : 1 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toNNReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = n := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_natCast n, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-19")] alias toNNReal_nat := toNNReal_natCast
theorem toNNReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ENNReal.toNNReal ofNat(n) = ofNat(n) :=
toNNReal_natCast n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = n := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_natCast n, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (Nat.cast_nonneg _)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-19")] alias toReal_nat := toReal_natCast
@[simp] theorem toReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ENNReal.toReal ofNat(n) = ofNat(n) :=
toReal_natCast n
lemma toNNReal_natCast_eq_toNNReal (n : ℕ) :
(n : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = (n : ℝ).toNNReal := by
rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg (by positivity), ENNReal.toNNReal_natCast, mk_natCast]
theorem le_coe_iff : a ≤ ↑r ↔ ∃ p : ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ p ≤ r := WithTop.le_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff : ↑r ≤ a ↔ ∀ p : ℝ≥0, a = p → r ≤ p := WithTop.coe_le_iff
theorem lt_iff_exists_coe : a < b ↔ ∃ p : ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ ↑p < b :=
WithTop.lt_iff_exists_coe
theorem toReal_le_coe_of_le_coe {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_le_ne_top coe_ne_top h
simpa using h
@[simp] theorem max_eq_zero_iff : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := max_eq_bot
theorem max_zero_left : max 0 a = a :=
max_eq_right (zero_le a)
theorem max_zero_right : max a 0 = a :=
max_eq_left (zero_le a)
theorem lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn :
a < b ↔ ∃ q : ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < Real.toNNReal q ∧ (Real.toNNReal q : ℝ≥0∞) < b :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 h with ⟨p, rfl, _⟩
rcases exists_between h with ⟨c, pc, cb⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 cb with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
rcases (NNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn _ _).1 (coe_lt_coe.1 pc) with ⟨q, hq0, pq, qr⟩
exact ⟨q, hq0, coe_lt_coe.2 pq, lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 qr) cb⟩,
fun ⟨_, _, qa, qb⟩ => lt_trans qa qb⟩
theorem lt_iff_exists_real_btwn :
a < b ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 ≤ r ∧ a < ENNReal.ofReal r ∧ (ENNReal.ofReal r : ℝ≥0∞) < b :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨q, q0, aq, qb⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h
⟨q, Rat.cast_nonneg.2 q0, aq, qb⟩,
fun ⟨_, _, qa, qb⟩ => lt_trans qa qb⟩
theorem lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn : a < b ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, a < r ∧ (r : ℝ≥0∞) < b :=
WithTop.lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn
theorem lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt : a < b ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ a + r < b := by
refine ⟨fun hab => ?_, fun ⟨r, _, hr⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt le_self_add hr⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hab with ⟨c, ac, cb⟩
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ac.ne_top
rw [coe_lt_coe] at ac
refine ⟨c - a, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 ac, ?_⟩
rwa [← coe_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le ac.le]
theorem le_of_forall_pos_le_add (h : ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → b < ∞ → a ≤ b + ε) : a ≤ b := by
contrapose! h
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 h with ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr0, h.trans_le le_top, hr⟩
theorem natCast_lt_coe {n : ℕ} : n < (r : ℝ≥0∞) ↔ n < r := ENNReal.coe_natCast n ▸ coe_lt_coe
theorem coe_lt_natCast {n : ℕ} : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < n ↔ r < n := ENNReal.coe_natCast n ▸ coe_lt_coe
protected theorem exists_nat_gt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≠ ∞) : ∃ n : ℕ, r < n := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using h
rcases exists_nat_gt r with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, coe_lt_natCast.2 hn⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iio_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Iio (n : ℝ≥0∞) = {∞}ᶜ := by
ext x
rw [mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => ne_top_of_lt hn, ENNReal.exists_nat_gt⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iic_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Iic (n : ℝ≥0∞) = {∞}ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion_subset fun n _x hx => ne_top_of_le_ne_top (natCast_ne_top n) hx) <|
iUnion_Iio_coe_nat ▸ iUnion_mono fun _ => Iio_subset_Iic_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Ioc a n = Ioi a \ {∞} := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic_coe_nat, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Ioo a n = Ioi a \ {∞} := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio_coe_nat, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Icc a n = Ici a \ {∞} := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic_coe_nat, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_coe_nat : ⋃ n : ℕ, Ico a n = Ici a \ {∞} := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio_coe_nat, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_Ici_coe_nat : ⋂ n : ℕ, Ici (n : ℝ≥0∞) = {∞} := by
simp only [← compl_Iio, ← compl_iUnion, iUnion_Iio_coe_nat, compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_Ioi_coe_nat : ⋂ n : ℕ, Ioi (n : ℝ≥0∞) = {∞} := by
simp only [← compl_Iic, ← compl_iUnion, iUnion_Iic_coe_nat, compl_compl]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (r p : ℝ≥0) : ((min r p : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = min (r : ℝ≥0∞) p := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (r p : ℝ≥0) : ((max r p : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = max (r : ℝ≥0∞) p := rfl
theorem le_of_top_imp_top_of_toNNReal_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ⊤ → b = ⊤)
(h_nnreal : a ≠ ⊤ → b ≠ ⊤ → a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal) : a ≤ b := by
by_contra! hlt
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hlt.ne_top
lift a to ℝ≥0 using mt h coe_ne_top
refine hlt.not_le ?_
simpa using h_nnreal
@[simp]
theorem abs_toReal {x : ℝ≥0∞} : |x.toReal| = x.toReal := by cases x <;> simp
end Order
section CompleteLattice
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0} : BddAbove s → (↑(sSup s) : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a :=
WithTop.coe_sSup
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set ℝ≥0} (hs : s.Nonempty) : (↑(sInf s) : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a :=
WithTop.coe_sInf hs (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem coe_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
(↑(iSup f) : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨆ a, ↑(f a) :=
WithTop.coe_iSup _ hf
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : (↑(iInf f) : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ a, ↑(f a) :=
WithTop.coe_iInf (OrderBot.bddBelow _)
theorem coe_mem_upperBounds {s : Set ℝ≥0} :
↑r ∈ upperBounds (ofNNReal '' s) ↔ r ∈ upperBounds s := by
simp +contextual [upperBounds, forall_mem_image, -mem_image, *]
lemma iSup_coe_eq_top : ⨆ i, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ ↔ ¬ BddAbove (range f) := WithTop.iSup_coe_eq_top
lemma iSup_coe_lt_top : ⨆ i, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) < ⊤ ↔ BddAbove (range f) := WithTop.iSup_coe_lt_top
lemma iInf_coe_eq_top : ⨅ i, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ ↔ IsEmpty ι := WithTop.iInf_coe_eq_top
lemma iInf_coe_lt_top : ⨅ i, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) < ⊤ ↔ Nonempty ι := WithTop.iInf_coe_lt_top
end CompleteLattice
section Bit
-- TODO: add lemmas about `OfNat.ofNat`
end Bit
end ENNReal
open ENNReal
namespace Set
namespace OrdConnected
variable {s : Set ℝ} {t : Set ℝ≥0} {u : Set ℝ≥0∞}
theorem preimage_coe_nnreal_ennreal (h : u.OrdConnected) : ((↑) ⁻¹' u : Set ℝ≥0).OrdConnected :=
| h.preimage_mono ENNReal.coe_mono
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Basic.lean | 708 | 709 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
/-!
# Divisibility and units
## Main definition
* `IsRelPrime x y`: that `x` and `y` are relatively prime, defined to mean that the only common
divisors of `x` and `y` are the units.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Units
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- Elements of the unit group of a monoid represented as elements of the monoid
divide any element of the monoid. -/
theorem coe_dvd : ↑u ∣ a :=
⟨↑u⁻¹ * a, by simp⟩
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_right : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, eq⟩ ↦ ⟨c * ↑u⁻¹, by rw [← mul_assoc, ← eq, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩)
fun ⟨_, eq⟩ ↦ eq.symm ▸ (_root_.dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_right _
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_right_dvd : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, eq⟩ => ⟨↑u * c, eq.trans (mul_assoc _ _ _)⟩) fun h =>
dvd_trans (Dvd.intro (↑u⁻¹) (by rw [mul_assoc, u.mul_inv, mul_one])) h
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all left
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_left : a ∣ u * b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply dvd_mul_right
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all
| left associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_left_dvd : ↑u * a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Divisibility/Units.lean | 57 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basis
/-!
# Rank of various constructions
## Main statements
- `rank_quotient_add_rank_le` : `rank M/N + rank N ≤ rank M`.
- `lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod`: `rank M × N ≤ rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_span_le_of_finite`: `rank (span s) ≤ #s` for finite `s`.
For free modules, we have
- `rank_prod` : `rank M × N = rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_finsupp` : `rank (ι →₀ M) = #ι * rank M`
- `rank_directSum`: `rank (⨁ Mᵢ) = ∑ rank Mᵢ`
- `rank_tensorProduct`: `rank (M ⊗ N) = rank M * rank N`.
Lemmas for ranks of submodules and subalgebras are also provided.
We have finrank variants for most lemmas as well.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u u' v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type u'} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Basis Cardinal DirectSum Function Module Set Submodule
section Quotient
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M]
theorem LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
{M' : Submodule R M} {ι₁ ι₂} {f : ι₁ → M'} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) (g : ι₂ → M)
(hg : LinearIndependent R (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := M') ∘ g)) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (f · : ι₁ → M) g) := by
refine .sum_type (hf.map' M'.subtype M'.ker_subtype) (.of_comp M'.mkQ hg) ?_
refine disjoint_def.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
have : x ∈ M' := span_le.mpr (Set.range_subset_iff.mpr fun i ↦ (f i).prop) h₁
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp.mp h₂
simp_rw [← Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← mkQ_apply, map_finsuppSum, map_smul, mkQ_apply] at this
rw [linearIndependent_iff.mp hg _ this, Finsupp.sum_zero_index]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias LinearIndependent.sum_elim_of_quotient := LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_of_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t) : LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
apply hs.union ht.of_comp
convert (Submodule.range_ker_disjoint ht).symm
· simp
aesop
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient {M' : Submodule R M}
{s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ M') (hs' : LinearIndepOn R id s) {t : Set M}
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ M') t) : LinearIndepOn R id (s ∪ t) :=
hs'.union_of_quotient <| by
rw [image_id]
exact ht.of_comp ((span R s).mapQ M' (LinearMap.id) (span_le.2 hs))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient :=
LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient
theorem linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) ↔
LinearIndepOn R f s ∧ LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.union_of_quotient h.2⟩
· exact h.mono subset_union_left
apply (h.mono subset_union_right).map
simpa [← image_eq_range] using ((linearIndepOn_union_iff hst).1 h).2.2.symm
theorem LinearIndepOn.quotient_iff_union {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t ↔ LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
rw [linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient hst, and_iff_right hs]
theorem rank_quotient_add_rank_le [Nontrivial R] (M' : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ M') + Module.rank R M' ≤ Module.rank R M := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R (M ⧸ M')
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M'
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
refine ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ?_
choose f hf using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective M'
simpa [add_comm] using (LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient ht (fun (i : s) ↦ f i)
(by simpa [Function.comp_def, hf] using hs)).cardinal_le_rank
theorem rank_quotient_le (p : Submodule R M) : Module.rank R (M ⧸ p) ≤ Module.rank R M :=
(mkQ p).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_quotient_le [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Finite R M]
(s : Submodule R M) : finrank R (M ⧸ s) ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat ((Submodule.mkQ s).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
end Quotient
variable [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
variable [Module R M]
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem rank_ulift : Module.rank R (ULift.{w} M) = Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) :=
Cardinal.lift_injective.{v} <| Eq.symm <| (lift_lift _).trans ULift.moduleEquiv.symm.lift_rank_eq
@[simp]
theorem finrank_ulift : finrank R (ULift M) = finrank R M := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_ulift, toNat_lift]
end ULift
section Prod
variable (R M M')
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M']
theorem rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ ≤ Module.rank R (M × M₁) := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
| have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M₁
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 136 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.LatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Modular Lattices
This file defines (semi)modular lattices, a kind of lattice useful in algebra.
For examples, look to the subobject lattices of abelian groups, submodules, and ideals, or consider
any distributive lattice.
## Typeclasses
We define (semi)modularity typeclasses as Prop-valued mixins.
* `IsWeakUpperModularLattice`: Weakly upper modular lattices. Lattice where `a ⊔ b` covers `a`
and `b` if `a` and `b` both cover `a ⊓ b`.
* `IsWeakLowerModularLattice`: Weakly lower modular lattices. Lattice where `a` and `b` cover
`a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b` covers both `a` and `b`
* `IsUpperModularLattice`: Upper modular lattices. Lattices where `a ⊔ b` covers `a` if `b`
covers `a ⊓ b`.
* `IsLowerModularLattice`: Lower modular lattices. Lattices where `a` covers `a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b`
covers `b`.
- `IsModularLattice`: Modular lattices. Lattices where `a ≤ c → (a ⊔ b) ⊓ c = a ⊔ (b ⊓ c)`. We
only require an inequality because the other direction holds in all lattices.
## Main Definitions
- `infIccOrderIsoIccSup` gives an order isomorphism between the intervals
`[a ⊓ b, a]` and `[b, a ⊔ b]`.
This corresponds to the diamond (or second) isomorphism theorems of algebra.
## Main Results
- `isModularLattice_iff_inf_sup_inf_assoc`:
Modularity is equivalent to the `inf_sup_inf_assoc`: `(x ⊓ z) ⊔ (y ⊓ z) = ((x ⊓ z) ⊔ y) ⊓ z`
- `DistribLattice.isModularLattice`: Distributive lattices are modular.
## References
* [Manfred Stern, *Semimodular lattices. {Theory} and applications*][stern2009]
* [Wikipedia, *Modular Lattice*][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_lattice]
## TODO
- Relate atoms and coatoms in modular lattices
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A weakly upper modular lattice is a lattice where `a ⊔ b` covers `a` and `b` if `a` and `b` both
cover `a ⊓ b`. -/
class IsWeakUpperModularLattice (α : Type*) [Lattice α] : Prop where
/-- `a ⊔ b` covers `a` and `b` if `a` and `b` both cover `a ⊓ b`. -/
covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_covBy {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ⋖ a → a ⊓ b ⋖ b → a ⋖ a ⊔ b
/-- A weakly lower modular lattice is a lattice where `a` and `b` cover `a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b` covers
both `a` and `b`. -/
class IsWeakLowerModularLattice (α : Type*) [Lattice α] : Prop where
/-- `a` and `b` cover `a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b` covers both `a` and `b` -/
inf_covBy_of_covBy_covBy_sup {a b : α} : a ⋖ a ⊔ b → b ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ a
/-- An upper modular lattice, aka semimodular lattice, is a lattice where `a ⊔ b` covers `a` and `b`
if either `a` or `b` covers `a ⊓ b`. -/
class IsUpperModularLattice (α : Type*) [Lattice α] : Prop where
/-- `a ⊔ b` covers `a` and `b` if either `a` or `b` covers `a ⊓ b` -/
covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ⋖ a → b ⋖ a ⊔ b
/-- A lower modular lattice is a lattice where `a` and `b` both cover `a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b` covers
either `a` or `b`. -/
class IsLowerModularLattice (α : Type*) [Lattice α] : Prop where
/-- `a` and `b` both cover `a ⊓ b` if `a ⊔ b` covers either `a` or `b` -/
inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup {a b : α} : a ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ b
/-- A modular lattice is one with a limited associativity between `⊓` and `⊔`. -/
class IsModularLattice (α : Type*) [Lattice α] : Prop where
/-- Whenever `x ≤ z`, then for any `y`, `(x ⊔ y) ⊓ z ≤ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z)` -/
sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le : ∀ {x : α} (y : α) {z : α}, x ≤ z → (x ⊔ y) ⊓ z ≤ x ⊔ y ⊓ z
section WeakUpperModular
variable [Lattice α] [IsWeakUpperModularLattice α] {a b : α}
theorem covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_of_inf_covBy_left : a ⊓ b ⋖ a → a ⊓ b ⋖ b → a ⋖ a ⊔ b :=
IsWeakUpperModularLattice.covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_covBy
theorem covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_of_inf_covBy_right : a ⊓ b ⋖ a → a ⊓ b ⋖ b → b ⋖ a ⊔ b := by
rw [inf_comm, sup_comm]
exact fun ha hb => covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_of_inf_covBy_left hb ha
alias CovBy.sup_of_inf_of_inf_left := covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_of_inf_covBy_left
alias CovBy.sup_of_inf_of_inf_right := covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_of_inf_covBy_right
instance : IsWeakLowerModularLattice (OrderDual α) :=
⟨fun ha hb => (ha.ofDual.sup_of_inf_of_inf_left hb.ofDual).toDual⟩
end WeakUpperModular
section WeakLowerModular
variable [Lattice α] [IsWeakLowerModularLattice α] {a b : α}
theorem inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_of_covBy_sup_left : a ⋖ a ⊔ b → b ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ a :=
IsWeakLowerModularLattice.inf_covBy_of_covBy_covBy_sup
theorem inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_of_covBy_sup_right : a ⋖ a ⊔ b → b ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ b := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm]
exact fun ha hb => inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_of_covBy_sup_left hb ha
alias CovBy.inf_of_sup_of_sup_left := inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_of_covBy_sup_left
alias CovBy.inf_of_sup_of_sup_right := inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_of_covBy_sup_right
instance : IsWeakUpperModularLattice (OrderDual α) :=
⟨fun ha hb => (ha.ofDual.inf_of_sup_of_sup_left hb.ofDual).toDual⟩
end WeakLowerModular
section UpperModular
variable [Lattice α] [IsUpperModularLattice α] {a b : α}
theorem covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_left : a ⊓ b ⋖ a → b ⋖ a ⊔ b :=
IsUpperModularLattice.covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy
theorem covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_right : a ⊓ b ⋖ b → a ⋖ a ⊔ b := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm]
exact covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_left
alias CovBy.sup_of_inf_left := covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_left
alias CovBy.sup_of_inf_right := covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy_right
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsUpperModularLattice.to_isWeakUpperModularLattice :
IsWeakUpperModularLattice α :=
⟨fun _ => CovBy.sup_of_inf_right⟩
instance : IsLowerModularLattice (OrderDual α) :=
⟨fun h => h.ofDual.sup_of_inf_left.toDual⟩
end UpperModular
section LowerModular
variable [Lattice α] [IsLowerModularLattice α] {a b : α}
theorem inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_left : a ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ b :=
IsLowerModularLattice.inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup
theorem inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_right : b ⋖ a ⊔ b → a ⊓ b ⋖ a := by
rw [inf_comm, sup_comm]
exact inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_left
alias CovBy.inf_of_sup_left := inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_left
alias CovBy.inf_of_sup_right := inf_covBy_of_covBy_sup_right
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsLowerModularLattice.to_isWeakLowerModularLattice :
IsWeakLowerModularLattice α :=
⟨fun _ => CovBy.inf_of_sup_right⟩
instance : IsUpperModularLattice (OrderDual α) :=
⟨fun h => h.ofDual.inf_of_sup_left.toDual⟩
end LowerModular
section IsModularLattice
variable [Lattice α] [IsModularLattice α]
theorem sup_inf_assoc_of_le {x : α} (y : α) {z : α} (h : x ≤ z) : (x ⊔ y) ⊓ z = x ⊔ y ⊓ z :=
le_antisymm (IsModularLattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le y h)
(le_inf (sup_le_sup_left inf_le_left _) (sup_le h inf_le_right))
theorem IsModularLattice.inf_sup_inf_assoc {x y z : α} : x ⊓ z ⊔ y ⊓ z = (x ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ z :=
(sup_inf_assoc_of_le y inf_le_right).symm
theorem inf_sup_assoc_of_le {x : α} (y : α) {z : α} (h : z ≤ x) : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x ⊓ (y ⊔ z) := by
rw [inf_comm, sup_comm, ← sup_inf_assoc_of_le y h, inf_comm, sup_comm]
instance : IsModularLattice αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun y z xz =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [inf_comm, sup_comm, eq_comm, inf_comm, sup_comm]
exact @sup_inf_assoc_of_le α _ _ _ y _ xz)⟩
variable {x y z : α}
theorem IsModularLattice.sup_inf_sup_assoc : (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ z) = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y ⊔ z :=
@IsModularLattice.inf_sup_inf_assoc αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem eq_of_le_of_inf_le_of_le_sup (hxy : x ≤ y) (hinf : y ⊓ z ≤ x) (hsup : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
x = y := by
refine hxy.antisymm ?_
rw [← inf_eq_right, sup_inf_assoc_of_le _ hxy] at hsup
rwa [← hsup, sup_le_iff, and_iff_right rfl.le, inf_comm]
theorem eq_of_le_of_inf_le_of_sup_le (hxy : x ≤ y) (hinf : y ⊓ z ≤ x ⊓ z) (hsup : y ⊔ z ≤ x ⊔ z) :
x = y :=
eq_of_le_of_inf_le_of_le_sup hxy (hinf.trans inf_le_left) (le_sup_left.trans hsup)
theorem sup_lt_sup_of_lt_of_inf_le_inf (hxy : x < y) (hinf : y ⊓ z ≤ x ⊓ z) : x ⊔ z < y ⊔ z :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (sup_le_sup_right (le_of_lt hxy) _) fun hsup =>
ne_of_lt hxy <| eq_of_le_of_inf_le_of_sup_le (le_of_lt hxy) hinf (le_of_eq hsup.symm)
theorem inf_lt_inf_of_lt_of_sup_le_sup (hxy : x < y) (hinf : y ⊔ z ≤ x ⊔ z) : x ⊓ z < y ⊓ z :=
sup_lt_sup_of_lt_of_inf_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ) hxy hinf
theorem strictMono_inf_prod_sup : StrictMono fun x ↦ (x ⊓ z, x ⊔ z) := fun _x _y hxy ↦
⟨⟨inf_le_inf_right _ hxy.le, sup_le_sup_right hxy.le _⟩,
fun ⟨inf_le, sup_le⟩ ↦ (sup_lt_sup_of_lt_of_inf_le_inf hxy inf_le).not_le sup_le⟩
/-- A generalization of the theorem that if `N` is a submodule of `M` and
`N` and `M / N` are both Artinian, then `M` is Artinian. -/
theorem wellFounded_lt_exact_sequence {β γ : Type*} [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
[h₁ : WellFoundedLT β] [h₂ : WellFoundedLT γ] (K : α)
(f₁ : β → α) (f₂ : α → β) (g₁ : γ → α) (g₂ : α → γ) (gci : GaloisCoinsertion f₁ f₂)
(gi : GaloisInsertion g₂ g₁) (hf : ∀ a, f₁ (f₂ a) = a ⊓ K) (hg : ∀ a, g₁ (g₂ a) = a ⊔ K) :
WellFoundedLT α :=
StrictMono.wellFoundedLT (f := fun A ↦ (f₂ A, g₂ A)) fun A B hAB ↦ by
simp only [Prod.le_def, lt_iff_le_not_le, ← gci.l_le_l_iff, ← gi.u_le_u_iff, hf, hg]
exact strictMono_inf_prod_sup hAB
/-- A generalization of the theorem that if `N` is a submodule of `M` and
`N` and `M / N` are both Noetherian, then `M` is Noetherian. -/
theorem wellFounded_gt_exact_sequence {β γ : Type*} [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
[WellFoundedGT β] [WellFoundedGT γ] (K : α)
(f₁ : β → α) (f₂ : α → β) (g₁ : γ → α) (g₂ : α → γ) (gci : GaloisCoinsertion f₁ f₂)
(gi : GaloisInsertion g₂ g₁) (hf : ∀ a, f₁ (f₂ a) = a ⊓ K) (hg : ∀ a, g₁ (g₂ a) = a ⊔ K) :
WellFoundedGT α :=
wellFounded_lt_exact_sequence (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := γᵒᵈ) (γ := βᵒᵈ)
K g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ gi.dual gci.dual hg hf
/-- The diamond isomorphism between the intervals `[a ⊓ b, a]` and `[b, a ⊔ b]` -/
@[simps]
def infIccOrderIsoIccSup (a b : α) : Set.Icc (a ⊓ b) a ≃o Set.Icc b (a ⊔ b) where
toFun x := ⟨x ⊔ b, ⟨le_sup_right, sup_le_sup_right x.prop.2 b⟩⟩
invFun x := ⟨a ⊓ x, ⟨inf_le_inf_left a x.prop.1, inf_le_left⟩⟩
left_inv x :=
Subtype.ext
(by
change a ⊓ (↑x ⊔ b) = ↑x
rw [sup_comm, ← inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ x.prop.2, sup_eq_right.2 x.prop.1])
right_inv x :=
Subtype.ext
(by
change a ⊓ ↑x ⊔ b = ↑x
rw [inf_comm, inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ x.prop.1, inf_eq_left.2 x.prop.2])
map_rel_iff' {x y} := by
simp only [Subtype.mk_le_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, le_sup_right]
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sup_le_sup_right h _⟩
rw [← sup_eq_right.2 x.prop.1, inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ x.prop.2, sup_comm, ←
sup_eq_right.2 y.prop.1, inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ y.prop.2, sup_comm b]
exact inf_le_inf_left _ h
theorem inf_strictMonoOn_Icc_sup {a b : α} : StrictMonoOn (fun c => a ⊓ c) (Icc b (a ⊔ b)) :=
StrictMono.of_restrict (infIccOrderIsoIccSup a b).symm.strictMono
theorem sup_strictMonoOn_Icc_inf {a b : α} : StrictMonoOn (fun c => c ⊔ b) (Icc (a ⊓ b) a) :=
StrictMono.of_restrict (infIccOrderIsoIccSup a b).strictMono
/-- The diamond isomorphism between the intervals `]a ⊓ b, a[` and `}b, a ⊔ b[`. -/
@[simps]
def infIooOrderIsoIooSup (a b : α) : Ioo (a ⊓ b) a ≃o Ioo b (a ⊔ b) where
toFun c :=
⟨c ⊔ b,
le_sup_right.trans_lt <|
sup_strictMonoOn_Icc_inf (left_mem_Icc.2 inf_le_left) (Ioo_subset_Icc_self c.2) c.2.1,
sup_strictMonoOn_Icc_inf (Ioo_subset_Icc_self c.2) (right_mem_Icc.2 inf_le_left) c.2.2⟩
invFun c :=
⟨a ⊓ c,
inf_strictMonoOn_Icc_sup (left_mem_Icc.2 le_sup_right) (Ioo_subset_Icc_self c.2) c.2.1,
inf_le_left.trans_lt' <|
inf_strictMonoOn_Icc_sup (Ioo_subset_Icc_self c.2) (right_mem_Icc.2 le_sup_right) c.2.2⟩
left_inv c :=
Subtype.ext <| by
dsimp
rw [sup_comm, ← inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ c.prop.2.le, sup_eq_right.2 c.prop.1.le]
right_inv c :=
Subtype.ext <| by
dsimp
rw [inf_comm, inf_sup_assoc_of_le _ c.prop.1.le, inf_eq_left.2 c.prop.2.le]
map_rel_iff' := @fun c d =>
@OrderIso.le_iff_le _ _ _ _ (infIccOrderIsoIccSup _ _) ⟨c.1, Ioo_subset_Icc_self c.2⟩
⟨d.1, Ioo_subset_Icc_self d.2⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsModularLattice.to_isLowerModularLattice : IsLowerModularLattice α :=
⟨fun {a b} => by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_Ioo_eq, sup_comm a, inf_comm a, ← isEmpty_coe_sort, right_lt_sup,
inf_lt_left, (infIooOrderIsoIooSup b a).symm.toEquiv.isEmpty_congr]
exact id⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsModularLattice.to_isUpperModularLattice : IsUpperModularLattice α :=
⟨fun {a b} => by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_Ioo_eq, ← isEmpty_coe_sort, right_lt_sup, inf_lt_left,
(infIooOrderIsoIooSup a b).toEquiv.isEmpty_congr]
exact id⟩
end IsModularLattice
namespace IsCompl
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsModularLattice α]
/-- The diamond isomorphism between the intervals `Set.Iic a` and `Set.Ici b`. -/
def IicOrderIsoIci {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : Set.Iic a ≃o Set.Ici b :=
(OrderIso.setCongr (Set.Iic a) (Set.Icc (a ⊓ b) a)
(h.inf_eq_bot.symm ▸ Set.Icc_bot.symm)).trans <|
(infIccOrderIsoIccSup a b).trans
(OrderIso.setCongr (Set.Icc b (a ⊔ b)) (Set.Ici b) (h.sup_eq_top.symm ▸ Set.Icc_top))
end IsCompl
theorem isModularLattice_iff_inf_sup_inf_assoc [Lattice α] :
IsModularLattice α ↔ ∀ x y z : α, x ⊓ z ⊔ y ⊓ z = (x ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => @IsModularLattice.inf_sup_inf_assoc _ _ h, fun h =>
⟨fun y z xz => by rw [← inf_eq_left.2 xz, h]⟩⟩
namespace DistribLattice
instance (priority := 100) [DistribLattice α] : IsModularLattice α :=
⟨fun y z xz => by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_eq_left.2 xz]⟩
end DistribLattice
namespace Disjoint
variable {a b c : α}
theorem disjoint_sup_right_of_disjoint_sup_left [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
[IsModularLattice α] (h : Disjoint a b) (hsup : Disjoint (a ⊔ b) c) :
Disjoint a (b ⊔ c) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← h.eq_bot, sup_comm]
apply le_inf inf_le_left
apply (inf_le_inf_right (c ⊔ b) le_sup_right).trans
rw [sup_comm, IsModularLattice.sup_inf_sup_assoc, hsup.eq_bot, bot_sup_eq]
theorem disjoint_sup_left_of_disjoint_sup_right [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
[IsModularLattice α] (h : Disjoint b c) (hsup : Disjoint a (b ⊔ c)) :
Disjoint (a ⊔ b) c := by
rw [disjoint_comm, sup_comm]
apply Disjoint.disjoint_sup_right_of_disjoint_sup_left h.symm
rwa [sup_comm, disjoint_comm] at hsup
theorem isCompl_sup_right_of_isCompl_sup_left [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsModularLattice α]
(h : Disjoint a b) (hcomp : IsCompl (a ⊔ b) c) :
IsCompl a (b ⊔ c) :=
⟨h.disjoint_sup_right_of_disjoint_sup_left hcomp.disjoint, codisjoint_assoc.mp hcomp.codisjoint⟩
theorem isCompl_sup_left_of_isCompl_sup_right [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsModularLattice α]
(h : Disjoint b c) (hcomp : IsCompl a (b ⊔ c)) :
IsCompl (a ⊔ b) c :=
⟨h.disjoint_sup_left_of_disjoint_sup_right hcomp.disjoint, codisjoint_assoc.mpr hcomp.codisjoint⟩
end Disjoint
lemma Set.Iic.isCompl_inf_inf_of_isCompl_of_le [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsModularLattice α]
{a b c : α} (h₁ : IsCompl b c) (h₂ : b ≤ a) :
IsCompl (⟨a ⊓ b, inf_le_left⟩ : Iic a) (⟨a ⊓ c, inf_le_left⟩ : Iic a) := by
constructor
· simp [disjoint_iff, Subtype.ext_iff, inf_comm a c, inf_assoc a, ← inf_assoc b, h₁.inf_eq_bot]
· simp only [Iic.codisjoint_iff, inf_comm a, IsModularLattice.inf_sup_inf_assoc]
simp [inf_of_le_left h₂, h₁.sup_eq_top]
namespace IsModularLattice
variable [Lattice α] [IsModularLattice α] {a : α}
instance isModularLattice_Iic : IsModularLattice (Set.Iic a) :=
⟨@fun x y z xz => (sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le (y : α) xz : (↑x ⊔ ↑y) ⊓ ↑z ≤ ↑x ⊔ ↑y ⊓ ↑z)⟩
instance isModularLattice_Ici : IsModularLattice (Set.Ici a) :=
⟨@fun x y z xz => (sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le (y : α) xz : (↑x ⊔ ↑y) ⊓ ↑z ≤ ↑x ⊔ ↑y ⊓ ↑z)⟩
section ComplementedLattice
variable [BoundedOrder α] [ComplementedLattice α]
|
instance complementedLattice_Iic : ComplementedLattice (Set.Iic a) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_isCompl x
⟨⟨y ⊓ a, Set.mem_Iic.2 inf_le_right⟩, by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
| Mathlib/Order/ModularLattice.lean | 393 | 399 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Basic
/-!
# Intersecting families
This file defines intersecting families and proves their basic properties.
## Main declarations
* `Set.Intersecting`: Predicate for a set of elements in a generalized boolean algebra to be an
intersecting family.
* `Set.Intersecting.card_le`: An intersecting family can only take up to half the elements, because
`a` and `aᶜ` cannot simultaneously be in it.
* `Set.Intersecting.is_max_iff_card_eq`: Any maximal intersecting family takes up half the elements.
## References
* [D. J. Kleitman, *Families of non-disjoint subsets*][kleitman1966]
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {s t : Set α} {a b c : α}
/-- A set family is intersecting if every pair of elements is non-disjoint. -/
def Intersecting (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ¬Disjoint a b
@[mono]
theorem Intersecting.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : s.Intersecting) : t.Intersecting := fun _a ha _b hb =>
hs (h ha) (h hb)
theorem Intersecting.not_bot_mem (hs : s.Intersecting) : ⊥ ∉ s := fun h => hs h h disjoint_bot_left
theorem Intersecting.ne_bot (hs : s.Intersecting) (ha : a ∈ s) : a ≠ ⊥ :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ha hs.not_bot_mem
theorem intersecting_empty : (∅ : Set α).Intersecting := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem intersecting_singleton : ({a} : Set α).Intersecting ↔ a ≠ ⊥ := by simp [Intersecting]
protected theorem Intersecting.insert (hs : s.Intersecting) (ha : a ≠ ⊥)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, ¬Disjoint a b) : (insert a s).Intersecting := by
rintro b (rfl | hb) c (rfl | hc)
· rwa [disjoint_self]
· exact h _ hc
· exact fun H => h _ hb H.symm
· exact hs hb hc
theorem intersecting_insert :
(insert a s).Intersecting ↔ s.Intersecting ∧ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ¬Disjoint a b :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono <| subset_insert _ _, h.ne_bot <| mem_insert _ _, fun _b hb =>
h (mem_insert _ _) <| mem_insert_of_mem _ hb⟩,
fun h => h.1.insert h.2.1 h.2.2⟩
theorem intersecting_iff_pairwise_not_disjoint :
s.Intersecting ↔ (s.Pairwise fun a b => ¬Disjoint a b) ∧ s ≠ {⊥} := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b hb _ => h ha hb, ?_⟩, fun h a ha b hb hab => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact intersecting_singleton.1 h rfl
have := h.1.eq ha hb (Classical.not_not.2 hab)
rw [this, disjoint_self] at hab
rw [hab] at hb
exact
h.2
(eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2
⟨hb, fun c hc => not_ne_iff.1 fun H => h.1 hb hc H.symm disjoint_bot_left⟩)
protected theorem Subsingleton.intersecting (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s.Intersecting ↔ s ≠ {⊥} :=
intersecting_iff_pairwise_not_disjoint.trans <| and_iff_right <| hs.pairwise _
theorem intersecting_iff_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Set α) :
s.Intersecting ↔ s = ∅ := by
refine
subsingleton_of_subsingleton.intersecting.trans
⟨not_imp_comm.2 fun h => subsingleton_of_subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 h
rwa [Subsingleton.elim ⊥ a]
· rintro rfl
exact (Set.singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty.symm
/-- Maximal intersecting families are upper sets. -/
| protected theorem Intersecting.isUpperSet (hs : s.Intersecting)
(h : ∀ t : Set α, t.Intersecting → s ⊆ t → s = t) : IsUpperSet s := by
classical
rintro a b hab ha
rw [h (Insert.insert b s) _ (subset_insert _ _)]
· exact mem_insert _ _
exact
hs.insert (mt (eq_bot_mono hab) <| hs.ne_bot ha) fun c hc hbc => hs ha hc <| hbc.mono_left hab
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Intersecting.lean | 99 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.ENNReal
/-!
# Counting measure
In this file we define the counting measure `MeasurTheory.Measure.count`
as `MeasureTheory.Measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac`
and prove basic properties of this measure.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Finset
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
/-- Counting measure on any measurable space. -/
def count : Measure α :=
sum dirac
@[simp] lemma count_ne_zero'' [Nonempty α] : (count : Measure α) ≠ 0 := by simp [count]
theorem le_count_apply : ∑' _ : s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ count s :=
calc
(∑' _ : s, 1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑' i, indicator s 1 i := tsum_subtype s 1
_ ≤ ∑' i, dirac i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => le_dirac_apply
_ ≤ count s := le_sum_apply _ _
theorem count_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : count s = s.encard := by
simp [count, hs, ← tsum_subtype, Set.encard]
@[deprecated measure_empty (since := "2025-02-06")]
theorem count_empty : count (∅ : Set α) = 0 := measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset' {s : Finset α} (hs : MeasurableSet (s : Set α)) :
count (↑s : Set α) = #s := by simp [count_apply hs]
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) :
count (↑s : Set α) = #s :=
count_apply_finset' s.measurableSet
theorem count_apply_finite' {s : Set α} (s_fin : s.Finite) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
count s = #s_fin.toFinset := by
simp [←
@count_apply_finset' _ _ s_fin.toFinset (by simpa only [Finite.coe_toFinset] using s_mble)]
theorem count_apply_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite) :
count s = #hs.toFinset := by rw [← count_apply_finset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
/-- `count` measure evaluates to infinity at infinite sets. -/
theorem count_apply_infinite (hs : s.Infinite) : count s = ∞ := by
refine top_unique (le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n => ?_)
rcases hs.exists_subset_card_eq n with ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
calc
(#t : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ t, 1 := by simp
_ = ∑' i : (t : Set α), 1 := (t.tsum_subtype 1).symm
_ ≤ count (t : Set α) := le_count_apply
_ ≤ count s := measure_mono ht
| @[simp]
theorem count_apply_eq_top' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s = ∞ ↔ s.Infinite := by
by_cases hs : s.Finite
· simp [Set.Infinite, hs, count_apply_finite' hs s_mble]
· change s.Infinite at hs
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Count.lean | 71 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Basis on a quaternion-like algebra
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃`: a basis for a subspace of an `R`-algebra `A` that has the
same algebra structure as `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.self R`: the canonical basis for `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.compHom b f`: transform a basis `b` by an AlgHom `f`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.lift`: Define an `AlgHom` out of `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` by its action on the basis
elements `i`, `j`, and `k`. In essence, this is a universal property. Analogous to `Complex.lift`,
but takes a bundled `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis` instead of just a `Subtype` as the amount of
data / proves is non-negligible.
-/
open Quaternion
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
/-- A quaternion basis contains the information both sufficient and necessary to construct an
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to `A`; or equivalently, a surjective
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to an `R`-subalgebra of `A`.
Note that for definitional convenience, `k` is provided as a field even though `i_mul_j` fully
determines it. -/
structure Basis {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) where
/-- The first imaginary unit -/
i : A
/-- The second imaginary unit -/
j : A
/-- The third imaginary unit -/
k : A
i_mul_i : i * i = c₁ • (1 : A) + c₂ • i
j_mul_j : j * j = c₃ • (1 : A)
i_mul_j : i * j = k
j_mul_i : j * i = c₂ • j - k
variable {R : Type*} {A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R}
namespace Basis
/-- Since `k` is redundant, it is not necessary to show `q₁.k = q₂.k` when showing `q₁ = q₂`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext ⦃q₁ q₂ : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃⦄ (hi : q₁.i = q₂.i)
(hj : q₁.j = q₂.j) : q₁ = q₂ := by
cases q₁; rename_i q₁_i_mul_j _
cases q₂; rename_i q₂_i_mul_j _
congr
rw [← q₁_i_mul_j, ← q₂_i_mul_j]
congr
variable (R) in
/-- There is a natural quaternionic basis for the `QuaternionAlgebra`. -/
@[simps i j k]
protected def self : Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃ where
i := ⟨0, 1, 0, 0⟩
i_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
j := ⟨0, 0, 1, 0⟩
j_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
k := ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩
i_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
j_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
instance : Inhabited (Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃) :=
⟨Basis.self R⟩
variable (q : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃)
attribute [simp] i_mul_i j_mul_j i_mul_j j_mul_i
@[simp]
theorem i_mul_k : q.i * q.k = c₁ • q.j + c₂ • q.k := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, i_mul_i, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_i : q.k * q.i = -c₁ • q.j := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, j_mul_i, mul_sub, i_mul_k, neg_smul, mul_smul_comm, i_mul_j]
linear_combination (norm := module)
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/QuaternionBasis.lean | 89 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Conditions for rank to be finite
Also contains characterization for when rank equals zero or rank equals one.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {ι : Type w}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁]
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
open Basis Cardinal Function Module Set Submodule
/-- If every finite set of linearly independent vectors has cardinality at most `n`,
then the same is true for arbitrary sets of linearly independent vectors.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
∀ s : Set M, LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) → #s ≤ n := by
intro s li
apply Cardinal.card_le_of
intro t
rw [← Finset.card_map (Embedding.subtype s)]
apply H
apply linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype _ li
theorem rank_le {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
Module.rank R M ≤ n := by
rw [Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
exact linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded H _ li
section RankZero
/-- See `rank_zero_iff` for a stronger version with `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_zero_iff :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • x = 0 := by
nontriviality R
constructor
· contrapose!
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
have : LinearIndependent R (fun _ : Unit ↦ x) :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr (fun l hl ↦ Finsupp.unique_ext <| not_not.mp fun H ↦
hx _ H ((Finsupp.linearCombination_unique _ _ _).symm.trans hl))
simpa using this.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· intro h
rw [← le_zero_iff, Module.rank_def]
apply ciSup_le'
intro ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff]
rintro ⟨i : s⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := h i
apply ha
simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (linearIndependent_iff.mp hs (Finsupp.single i a) (by simpa)) i
theorem rank_pos_of_free [Module.Free R M] [Nontrivial M] :
0 < Module.rank R M :=
have := Module.nontrivial R M
(pos_of_ne_zero <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _).trans_le
(Free.chooseBasis R M).linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank
variable [Nontrivial R]
section
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
theorem rank_zero_iff_forall_zero :
Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ ∀ x : M, x = 0 := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_zero_iff, smul_eq_zero, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, false_or,
exists_and_right, and_iff_right (exists_ne (0 : R))]
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` for the reason that `Nontrivial R` is needed.
Also see `rank_eq_zero_iff` for the version without `NoZeroSMulDivisor R M`. -/
theorem rank_zero_iff : Module.rank R M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M :=
rank_zero_iff_forall_zero.trans (subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).symm
theorem rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ ∃ x : M, x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simpa using rank_zero_iff_forall_zero
theorem rank_pos_iff_nontrivial : 0 < Module.rank R M ↔ Nontrivial M :=
rank_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero.trans (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne 0).symm
theorem rank_pos [Nontrivial M] : 0 < Module.rank R M :=
rank_pos_iff_nontrivial.mpr ‹_›
end
variable (R M)
/-- See `rank_subsingleton` that assumes `Subsingleton R` instead. -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem rank_subsingleton' [Subsingleton M] : Module.rank R M = 0 :=
rank_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun _ ↦ ⟨1, one_ne_zero, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rank_punit : Module.rank R PUnit = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
@[simp]
theorem rank_bot : Module.rank R (⊥ : Submodule R M) = 0 := rank_subsingleton' _ _
variable {R M}
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_rank_pos {s : Submodule R M} (h : 0 < Module.rank R s) :
∃ b : M, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot fun eq => by rw [eq, rank_bot] at h; exact lt_irrefl _ h
end RankZero
section Finite
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat [Module.Free R M] {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M = n) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨⟨ι, b⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
have := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.mp <|
b.linearIndependent.cardinal_le_rank |>.trans_eq h |>.trans_lt <| nat_lt_aleph0 n
exact Module.Finite.of_basis b
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(h : Module.rank R M = 0) :
Module.Finite R M := by
nontriviality R
rw [rank_zero_iff] at h
infer_instance
theorem Module.finite_of_rank_eq_one [Module.Free R M] (h : Module.rank R M = 1) :
Module.Finite R M :=
Module.finite_of_rank_eq_nat <| h.trans Nat.cast_one.symm
section
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem Basis.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Nonempty (Fintype ι) := by
rwa [← Cardinal.lift_lt, ← b.mk_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_lt_aleph0,
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_fintype] at h
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite type. -/
noncomputable def Basis.fintypeIndexOfRankLtAleph0 {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : Fintype ι :=
Classical.choice (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
/-- If a module has a finite dimension, all bases are indexed by a finite set. -/
theorem Basis.finite_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (b : Basis s R M)
(h : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀) : s.Finite :=
finite_def.2 (b.nonempty_fintype_index_of_rank_lt_aleph0 h)
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
theorem cardinalMk_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type w} {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) : #ι ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← lift_le.{max v w}]
simpa only [← finrank_eq_rank, lift_natCast, lift_le_nat_iff] using h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")] alias cardinal_mk_le_finrank := cardinalMk_le_finrank
theorem fintype_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R b) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ finrank R M := by
simpa using h.cardinalMk_le_finrank
theorem finset_card_le_finrank [Module.Finite R M]
{b : Finset M} (h : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : b → M)) :
b.card ≤ finrank R M := by
rw [← Fintype.card_coe]
exact h.fintype_card_le_finrank
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite {ι : Type w}
[Module.Finite R M] {v : ι → M} (h : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι < ℵ₀ := by
apply Cardinal.lift_lt.1
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
· rw [← finrank_eq_rank, Cardinal.lift_aleph0, Cardinal.lift_natCast]
apply Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0
theorem finite [Module.Finite R M] {ι : Type*} {f : ι → M}
(h : LinearIndependent R f) : Finite ι :=
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_finite.1 <| h.lt_aleph0_of_finite
theorem setFinite [Module.Finite R M] {b : Set M}
(h : LinearIndependent R fun x : b => (x : M)) : b.Finite :=
Cardinal.lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.mp h.lt_aleph0_of_finite
end LinearIndependent
lemma exists_set_linearIndependent_of_lt_rank {n : Cardinal} (hn : n < Module.rank R M) :
∃ s : Set M, #s = n ∧ LinearIndepOn R id s := by
obtain ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, hs'⟩ := exists_lt_of_lt_ciSup' (hn.trans_eq (Module.rank_def R M))
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := le_mk_iff_exists_subset.mp hs'.le
exact ⟨t, ht', hs.mono ht⟩
lemma exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ Module.rank R M) :
∃ s : Finset M, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndepOn R id (s : Set M) := by
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with h | h
| · obtain ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, hs'⟩ := Cardinal.exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq _
(Cardinal.bddAbove_range _) _ (h.trans (Module.rank_def R M)).symm
have : Finite s := lt_aleph0_iff_finite.mp (hs' ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
cases nonempty_fintype s
refine ⟨s.toFinset, by simpa using hs', by simpa⟩
· obtain ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩ := exists_set_linearIndependent_of_lt_rank h
have : Finite s := lt_aleph0_iff_finite.mp (hs ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
cases nonempty_fintype s
exact ⟨s.toFinset, by simpa using hs, by simpa⟩
lemma exists_linearIndependent_of_le_rank {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ Module.rank R M) :
∃ f : Fin n → M, LinearIndependent R f :=
have ⟨_, hs, hs'⟩ := exists_finset_linearIndependent_of_le_rank hn
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Finite.lean | 220 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Final
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.TwoSquare
/-!
# Guitart exact squares
Given four functors `T`, `L`, `R` and `B`, a 2-square `TwoSquare T L R B` consists of
a natural transformation `w : T ⋙ R ⟶ L ⋙ B`:
```
T
C₁ ⥤ C₂
L | | R
v v
C₃ ⥤ C₄
B
```
In this file, we define a typeclass `w.GuitartExact` which expresses
that this square is exact in the sense of Guitart. This means that
for any `X₃ : C₃`, the induced functor
`CostructuredArrow L X₃ ⥤ CostructuredArrow R (B.obj X₃)` is final.
It is also equivalent to the fact that for any `X₂ : C₂`, the
induced functor `StructuredArrow X₂ T ⥤ StructuredArrow (R.obj X₂) B`
is initial.
Various categorical notions (fully faithful functors, adjunctions, etc.) can
be characterized in terms of Guitart exact squares. Their particular role
in pointwise Kan extensions shall also be used in the construction of
derived functors.
## TODO
* Define the notion of derivability structure from
[the paper by Kahn and Maltsiniotis][KahnMaltsiniotis2008] using Guitart exact squares
and construct (pointwise) derived functors using this notion
## References
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/exact+square
* [René Guitart, *Relations et carrés exacts*][Guitart1980]
* [Bruno Kahn and Georges Maltsiniotis, *Structures de dérivabilité*][KahnMaltsiniotis2008]
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable {C₁ : Type u₁} {C₂ : Type u₂} {C₃ : Type u₃} {C₄ : Type u₄}
[Category.{v₁} C₁] [Category.{v₂} C₂] [Category.{v₃} C₃] [Category.{v₄} C₄]
(T : C₁ ⥤ C₂) (L : C₁ ⥤ C₃) (R : C₂ ⥤ C₄) (B : C₃ ⥤ C₄)
namespace TwoSquare
variable {T L R B} (w : TwoSquare T L R B)
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and `X₃ : C₃`, this is the obvious functor
`CostructuredArrow L X₃ ⥤ CostructuredArrow R (B.obj X₃)`. -/
@[simps! obj map]
def costructuredArrowRightwards (X₃ : C₃) :
CostructuredArrow L X₃ ⥤ CostructuredArrow R (B.obj X₃) :=
CostructuredArrow.post L B X₃ ⋙ Comma.mapLeft _ w ⋙
CostructuredArrow.pre T R (B.obj X₃)
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and `X₂ : C₂`, this is the obvious functor
`StructuredArrow X₂ T ⥤ StructuredArrow (R.obj X₂) B`. -/
@[simps! obj map]
def structuredArrowDownwards (X₂ : C₂) :
StructuredArrow X₂ T ⥤ StructuredArrow (R.obj X₂) B :=
StructuredArrow.post X₂ T R ⋙ Comma.mapRight _ w ⋙
StructuredArrow.pre (R.obj X₂) L B
section
variable {X₂ : C₂} {X₃ : C₃} (g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃)
/- In [the paper by Kahn and Maltsiniotis, §4.3][KahnMaltsiniotis2008], given
`w : TwoSquare T L R B` and `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, a category `J` is introduced
and it is observed that it is equivalent to the two categories
`w.StructuredArrowRightwards g` and `w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g`. We shall show below
that there is an equivalence
`w.equivalenceJ g : w.StructuredArrowRightwards g ≌ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g`. -/
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and a morphism `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, this is the
category `StructuredArrow (CostructuredArrow.mk g) (w.costructuredArrowRightwards X₃)`,
see the constructor `StructuredArrowRightwards.mk` for the data that is involved. -/
abbrev StructuredArrowRightwards :=
StructuredArrow (CostructuredArrow.mk g) (w.costructuredArrowRightwards X₃)
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and a morphism `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, this is the
category `CostructuredArrow (w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂) (StructuredArrow.mk g)`,
see the constructor `CostructuredArrowDownwards.mk` for the data that is involved. -/
abbrev CostructuredArrowDownwards :=
CostructuredArrow (w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂) (StructuredArrow.mk g)
section
variable (X₁ : C₁) (a : X₂ ⟶ T.obj X₁) (b : L.obj X₁ ⟶ X₃)
/-- Constructor for objects in `w.StructuredArrowRightwards g`. -/
abbrev StructuredArrowRightwards.mk (comm : R.map a ≫ w.app X₁ ≫ B.map b = g) :
w.StructuredArrowRightwards g :=
StructuredArrow.mk (Y := CostructuredArrow.mk b) (CostructuredArrow.homMk a comm)
/-- Constructor for objects in `w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g`. -/
abbrev CostructuredArrowDownwards.mk (comm : R.map a ≫ w.app X₁ ≫ B.map b = g) :
w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g :=
CostructuredArrow.mk (Y := StructuredArrow.mk a)
(StructuredArrow.homMk b (by simpa using comm))
variable {w g}
lemma StructuredArrowRightwards.mk_surjective
(f : w.StructuredArrowRightwards g) :
∃ (X₁ : C₁) (a : X₂ ⟶ T.obj X₁) (b : L.obj X₁ ⟶ X₃)
(comm : R.map a ≫ w.app X₁ ≫ B.map b = g), f = mk w g X₁ a b comm := by
obtain ⟨g, φ, rfl⟩ := StructuredArrow.mk_surjective f
obtain ⟨X₁, b, rfl⟩ := g.mk_surjective
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := CostructuredArrow.homMk_surjective φ
exact ⟨X₁, a, b, by simpa using ha, rfl⟩
lemma CostructuredArrowDownwards.mk_surjective
(f : w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g) :
∃ (X₁ : C₁) (a : X₂ ⟶ T.obj X₁) (b : L.obj X₁ ⟶ X₃)
(comm : R.map a ≫ w.app X₁ ≫ B.map b = g), f = mk w g X₁ a b comm := by
obtain ⟨g, φ, rfl⟩ := CostructuredArrow.mk_surjective f
obtain ⟨X₁, a, rfl⟩ := g.mk_surjective
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := StructuredArrow.homMk_surjective φ
exact ⟨X₁, a, b, by simpa using hb, rfl⟩
end
namespace EquivalenceJ
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and a morphism `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, this is
the obvious functor `w.StructuredArrowRightwards g ⥤ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g`. -/
@[simps]
def functor : w.StructuredArrowRightwards g ⥤ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g where
obj f := CostructuredArrow.mk (Y := StructuredArrow.mk f.hom.left)
(StructuredArrow.homMk f.right.hom (by simpa using CostructuredArrow.w f.hom))
map {f₁ f₂} φ :=
CostructuredArrow.homMk (StructuredArrow.homMk φ.right.left
(by dsimp; rw [← StructuredArrow.w φ]; rfl))
(by ext; exact CostructuredArrow.w φ.right)
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and a morphism `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, this is
the obvious functor `w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g ⥤ w.StructuredArrowRightwards g`. -/
@[simps]
def inverse : w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g ⥤ w.StructuredArrowRightwards g where
obj f := StructuredArrow.mk (Y := CostructuredArrow.mk f.hom.right)
(CostructuredArrow.homMk f.left.hom (by simpa using StructuredArrow.w f.hom))
map {f₁ f₂} φ :=
StructuredArrow.homMk (CostructuredArrow.homMk φ.left.right
(by dsimp; rw [← CostructuredArrow.w φ]; rfl))
(by ext; exact StructuredArrow.w φ.left)
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
end EquivalenceJ
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B` and a morphism `g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃`, this is
the obvious equivalence of categories
`w.StructuredArrowRightwards g ≌ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g`. -/
@[simps functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def equivalenceJ : w.StructuredArrowRightwards g ≌ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g where
functor := EquivalenceJ.functor w g
inverse := EquivalenceJ.inverse w g
unitIso := Iso.refl _
counitIso := Iso.refl _
lemma isConnected_rightwards_iff_downwards :
IsConnected (w.StructuredArrowRightwards g) ↔ IsConnected (w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g) :=
isConnected_iff_of_equivalence (w.equivalenceJ g)
end
section
/-- The functor `w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g ⥤ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g'` induced
by a morphism `γ` such that `R.map γ ≫ g = g'`. -/
@[simps]
def costructuredArrowDownwardsPrecomp
{X₂ X₂' : C₂} {X₃ : C₃} (g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃) (g' : R.obj X₂' ⟶ B.obj X₃)
(γ : X₂' ⟶ X₂) (hγ : R.map γ ≫ g = g') :
w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g ⥤ w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g' where
obj A := CostructuredArrowDownwards.mk _ _ A.left.right (γ ≫ A.left.hom) A.hom.right
(by simpa [← hγ] using R.map γ ≫= StructuredArrow.w A.hom)
map {A A'} φ := CostructuredArrow.homMk (StructuredArrow.homMk φ.left.right (by
dsimp
rw [assoc, StructuredArrow.w])) (by
ext
dsimp
rw [← CostructuredArrow.w φ, structuredArrowDownwards_map]
rfl)
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
end
/-- Condition on `w : TwoSquare T L R B` expressing that it is a Guitart exact square.
It is equivalent to saying that for any `X₃ : C₃`, the induced functor
`CostructuredArrow L X₃ ⥤ CostructuredArrow R (B.obj X₃)` is final (see `guitartExact_iff_final`)
or equivalently that for any `X₂ : C₂`, the induced functor
`StructuredArrow X₂ T ⥤ StructuredArrow (R.obj X₂) B` is initial (see `guitartExact_iff_initial`).
See also `guitartExact_iff_isConnected_rightwards`, `guitartExact_iff_isConnected_downwards`
for characterizations in terms of the connectedness of auxiliary categories. -/
class GuitartExact : Prop where
isConnected_rightwards {X₂ : C₂} {X₃ : C₃} (g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃) :
IsConnected (w.StructuredArrowRightwards g)
lemma guitartExact_iff_isConnected_rightwards :
w.GuitartExact ↔ ∀ {X₂ : C₂} {X₃ : C₃} (g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃),
IsConnected (w.StructuredArrowRightwards g) :=
⟨fun h => h.isConnected_rightwards, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma guitartExact_iff_isConnected_downwards :
w.GuitartExact ↔ ∀ {X₂ : C₂} {X₃ : C₃} (g : R.obj X₂ ⟶ B.obj X₃),
IsConnected (w.CostructuredArrowDownwards g) := by
simp only [guitartExact_iff_isConnected_rightwards,
isConnected_rightwards_iff_downwards]
instance [hw : w.GuitartExact] {X₃ : C₃} (g : CostructuredArrow R (B.obj X₃)) :
IsConnected (StructuredArrow g (w.costructuredArrowRightwards X₃)) := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_isConnected_rightwards] at hw
apply hw
instance [hw : w.GuitartExact] {X₂ : C₂} (g : StructuredArrow (R.obj X₂) B) :
IsConnected (CostructuredArrow (w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂) g) := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_isConnected_downwards] at hw
apply hw
lemma guitartExact_iff_final :
w.GuitartExact ↔ ∀ (X₃ : C₃), (w.costructuredArrowRightwards X₃).Final :=
⟨fun _ _ => ⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩, fun _ => ⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩⟩
instance [hw : w.GuitartExact] (X₃ : C₃) :
(w.costructuredArrowRightwards X₃).Final := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_final] at hw
apply hw
lemma guitartExact_iff_initial :
w.GuitartExact ↔ ∀ (X₂ : C₂), (w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂).Initial :=
⟨fun _ _ => ⟨fun _ => inferInstance⟩, by
rw [guitartExact_iff_isConnected_downwards]
intros
infer_instance⟩
instance [hw : w.GuitartExact] (X₂ : C₂) :
(w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂).Initial := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_initial] at hw
apply hw
/-- When the left and right functors of a 2-square are equivalences, and the natural
| transformation of the 2-square is an isomorphism, then the 2-square is Guitart exact. -/
instance (priority := 100) guitartExact_of_isEquivalence_of_isIso
[L.IsEquivalence] [R.IsEquivalence] [IsIso w] : GuitartExact w := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_initial]
intro X₂
have := StructuredArrow.isEquivalence_post X₂ T R
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GuitartExact/Basic.lean | 262 | 267 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 618 | 620 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
/-!
# The normalizer of Lie submodules and subalgebras.
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie subalgebra `L`, the normalizer of a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` is
the Lie submodule with underlying set `{ m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N }`.
The lattice of Lie submodules thus has two natural operations, the normalizer: `N ↦ N.normalizer`
and the ideal operation: `N ↦ ⁅⊤, N⁆`; these are adjoint, i.e., they form a Galois connection. This
adjointness is the reason that we may define nilpotency in terms of either the upper or lower
central series.
Given a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, we may regard `H` as a Lie submodule of `L` over `H`, and thus
consider the normalizer. This turns out to be a Lie subalgebra.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.normalizer`
* `LieSubalgebra.normalizer`
* `LieSubmodule.gc_top_lie_normalizer`
## Tags
lie algebra, normalizer
-/
variable {R L M M' : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] [LieModule R L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M) {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
/-- The normalizer of a Lie submodule.
See also `LieSubmodule.idealizer`. -/
def normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := {m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N}
add_mem' hm₁ hm₂ x := by rw [lie_add]; exact N.add_mem' (hm₁ x) (hm₂ x)
zero_mem' x := by simp
smul_mem' t m hm x := by rw [lie_smul]; exact N.smul_mem' t (hm x)
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [leibniz_lie]; exact N.add_mem' (hm ⁅y, x⁆) (N.lie_mem (hm y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_normalizer (m : M) : m ∈ N.normalizer ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_normalizer : N ≤ N.normalizer := by
intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer]
exact fun x => N.lie_mem hm
theorem normalizer_inf : (N₁ ⊓ N₂).normalizer = N₁.normalizer ⊓ N₂.normalizer := by
ext; simp [← forall_and]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem normalizer_mono (h : N₁ ≤ N₂) : normalizer N₁ ≤ normalizer N₂ := by
intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer] at hm ⊢
exact fun x ↦ h (hm x)
theorem monotone_normalizer : Monotone (normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M) :=
| fun _ _ ↦ normalizer_mono
@[simp]
theorem comap_normalizer (f : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M) : N.normalizer.comap f = (N.comap f).normalizer := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Normalizer.lean | 75 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Dimension of modules and vector spaces
## Main definitions
* The rank of a module is defined as `Module.rank : Cardinal`.
This is defined as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
## Main statements
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_injective`: the source of an injective linear map has dimension
at most that of the target.
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_surjective`: the target of a surjective linear map has dimension
at most that of that source.
## Implementation notes
Many theorems in this file are not universe-generic when they relate dimensions
in different universes. They should be as general as they can be without
inserting `lift`s. The types `M`, `M'`, ... all live in different universes,
and `M₁`, `M₂`, ... all live in the same universe.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' u u' v v'
variable {R : Type u} {R' : Type u'} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
open Cardinal Submodule Function Set
section Module
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (R M)
/-- The rank of a module, defined as a term of type `Cardinal`.
We define this as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
The supremum may not be attained, see https://mathoverflow.net/a/263053.
For a free module over any ring satisfying the strong rank condition
(e.g. left-noetherian rings, commutative rings, and in particular division rings and fields),
this is the same as the dimension of the space (i.e. the cardinality of any basis).
In particular this agrees with the usual notion of the dimension of a vector space.
See also `Module.finrank` for a `ℕ`-valued function which returns the correct value
for a finite-dimensional vector space (but 0 for an infinite-dimensional vector space).
-/
@[stacks 09G3 "first part"]
protected irreducible_def Module.rank : Cardinal :=
⨆ ι : { s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s }, (#ι.1)
theorem rank_le_card : Module.rank R M ≤ #M :=
(Module.rank_def _ _).trans_le (ciSup_le' fun _ ↦ mk_set_le _)
lemma nonempty_linearIndependent_set : Nonempty {s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s } :=
⟨⟨∅, linearIndepOn_empty _ _⟩⟩
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Nontrivial R]
theorem cardinal_lift_le_rank {ι : Type w} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [Module.rank]
refine le_trans ?_ (lift_le.mpr <| le_ciSup (bddAbove_range _) ⟨_, hv.linearIndepOn_id⟩)
exact lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective _ hv.injective).toEmbedding⟩
lemma aleph0_le_rank {ι : Type w} [Infinite ι] {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : ℵ₀ ≤ Module.rank R M :=
aleph0_le_lift.mp <| (aleph0_le_lift.mpr <| aleph0_le_mk ι).trans hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank {ι : Type v} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι ≤ Module.rank R M := by
simpa using hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank' {s : Set M}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M)) : #s ≤ Module.rank R M :=
hs.cardinal_le_rank
theorem _root_.LinearIndepOn.encard_le_toENat_rank {ι : Type*} {v : ι → M} {s : Set ι}
(hs : LinearIndepOn R v s) : s.encard ≤ (Module.rank R M).toENat := by
simpa using OrderHom.mono (β := ℕ∞) Cardinal.toENat hs.linearIndependent.cardinal_lift_le_rank
end LinearIndependent
section SurjectiveInjective
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Semiring R']
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R' → R` is an injective map
non-zero elements, `j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar
multiplications on `M` and `M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to
the rank of `M' / R'`. As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is
`LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ (i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M')
(hi : Injective i) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
simp_rw [Module.rank, lift_iSup (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range _) fun ⟨s, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨j '' s,
LinearIndepOn.id_image (h.linearIndependent.map_of_injective_injectiveₛ i j hi hj hc)⟩,
lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.image j s hj).toEmbedding⟩⟩
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a surjective map, and
`j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar multiplications on `M` and
`M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to the rank of `M' / R'`.
As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is `LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_surjective_injective (i : R → R') (j : M →+ M')
(hi : Surjective i) (hj : Injective j) (hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'⟩ := hi.hasRightInverse
| refine lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ i' j (fun _ _ h ↦ ?_) hj fun r m ↦ ?_
· apply_fun i at h
rwa [hi', hi'] at h
rw [hc (i' r) m, hi']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a bijective map which maps zero to zero,
`j : M ≃+ M'` is a group isomorphism, such that the scalar multiplications on `M` and `M'` are
compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is equal to the rank of `M' / R'`.
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Basic.lean | 135 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
theorem degrees_add_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem degrees_sum_le {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
theorem degrees_mul_le {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
theorem degrees_prod_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
theorem degrees_pow_le {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod_le (s := .range n) (f := fun _ ↦ p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_add := degrees_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sum := degrees_sum_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_mul := degrees_mul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_prod := degrees_prod_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_pow := degrees_pow_le
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
theorem le_degrees_add_left (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias le_degrees_add := le_degrees_add_left
lemma le_degrees_add_right (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : q.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
simpa [add_comm] using le_degrees_add_left h.symm
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) :
(p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees :=
degrees_add_le.antisymm <| Multiset.union_le (le_degrees_add_left h) (le_degrees_add_right h)
lemma degrees_map_le [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S} : (map f p).degrees ≤ p.degrees := by
classical exact Finset.sup_mono <| support_map_subset ..
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_map := degrees_map_le
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).degrees ⊆ φ.degrees.map f := by
classical
intro i
rw [mem_degrees, Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩ := coeff_rename_ne_zero _ _ _ hd
simp only [Finsupp.mapDomain, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [sum_apply, Finsupp.sum] at hi
contrapose! hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro j hj
simp only [exists_prop, mem_degrees] at hi
specialize hi j ⟨x, hx, hj⟩
rw [Finsupp.single_apply, if_neg hi]
theorem degrees_map_of_injective [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Injective f) : (map f p).degrees = p.degrees := by
simp only [degrees, MvPolynomial.support_map_of_injective _ hf]
theorem degrees_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f) :
degrees (rename f p) = (degrees p).map f := by
classical
simp only [degrees, Multiset.map_finset_sup p.support Finsupp.toMultiset f h,
support_rename_of_injective h, Finset.sup_image]
refine Finset.sup_congr rfl fun x _ => ?_
exact (Finsupp.toMultiset_map _ _).symm
end Degrees
section DegreeOf
/-! ### `degreeOf` -/
/-- `degreeOf n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degreeOf (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.count n
theorem degreeOf_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degreeOf n = p.degrees.count n := by rw [degreeOf]; convert rfl
theorem degreeOf_eq_sup (n : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n f = f.support.sup fun m => m n := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_def, degrees, Multiset.count_finset_sup]
congr
ext
simp only [count_toMultiset]
theorem degreeOf_lt_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} (h : 0 < d) :
degreeOf n f < d ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → m n < d := by
rwa [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
lemma degreeOf_le_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} :
degreeOf n f ≤ d ↔ ∀ m ∈ support f, m n ≤ d := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_zero (n : σ) : degreeOf n (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp only [degreeOf_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.count_zero]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_C (a : R) (x : σ) : degreeOf x (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp [degreeOf_def, degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) [Nontrivial R] :
degreeOf i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
classical
by_cases c : i = j
· simp only [c, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, degreeOf_def, degrees_X, Multiset.count_singleton]
simp [c, if_false, degreeOf_def, degrees_X]
theorem degreeOf_add_le (n : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n (f + g) ≤ max (degreeOf n f) (degreeOf n g) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem monomial_le_degreeOf (i : σ) {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} (h_m : m ∈ f.support) :
m i ≤ degreeOf i f := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup i]
apply Finset.le_sup h_m
lemma degreeOf_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (i : σ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(monomial s a).degreeOf i = s i := by
classical rw [degreeOf_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ ha, Finsupp.count_toMultiset]
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_mul_le (i : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (f * g) ≤ degreeOf i f + degreeOf i g := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
rw [Multiset.count_add]
theorem degreeOf_sum_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∑ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ s.sup fun j => degreeOf i (f j) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_sum_le
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_prod_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∏ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ ∑ j ∈ s, (f j).degreeOf i := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_prod_le (by simp only [coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply])
(fun _ _ => by simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply])
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_pow_le (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :
degreeOf i (p ^ n) ≤ n * degreeOf i p := by
simpa using degreeOf_prod_le i (Finset.range n) (fun _ => p)
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_of_ne {i j : σ} (f : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : i ≠ j) :
degreeOf i (f * X j) = degreeOf i f := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf_eq_sup i, support_mul_X, Finset.sup_map]
congr
ext
simp only [Finsupp.single, add_eq_left, addRightEmbedding_apply, coe_mk,
Pi.add_apply, comp_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.single_eq_of_ne h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")] alias degreeOf_mul_X_ne := degreeOf_mul_X_of_ne
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_self (j : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf j (f * X j) ≤ degreeOf j f + 1 := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf]
apply (Multiset.count_le_of_le j degrees_mul_le).trans
simp only [Multiset.count_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le j <| degrees_X' j
rw [Multiset.count_singleton_self]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")] alias degreeOf_mul_X_eq := degreeOf_mul_X_self
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_eq_degreeOf_add_one_iff (j : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf j (f * X j) = degreeOf j f + 1 ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => by by_contra ha; simp [ha] at h, fun h => ?_⟩
apply Nat.le_antisymm (degreeOf_mul_X_self j f)
have : (f.support.sup fun m ↦ m j) + 1 = (f.support.sup fun m ↦ (m j + 1)) :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_nonempty @Nat.succ_le_succ (support_nonempty.mpr h)
simp only [degreeOf_eq_sup, support_mul_X, this]
apply Finset.sup_le
intro x hx
simp only [Finset.sup_map, bot_eq_zero', add_pos_iff, zero_lt_one, or_true, Finset.le_sup_iff]
use x
simpa using mem_support_iff.mp hx
theorem degreeOf_C_mul_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(C c * p).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
simp only [degrees_C, zero_add]
theorem degreeOf_mul_C_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(p * C c).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
simp only [degrees_C, add_zero]
theorem degreeOf_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f)
(i : σ) : degreeOf (f i) (rename f p) = degreeOf i p := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf, degrees_rename_of_injective h, Multiset.count_map_eq_count' f p.degrees h]
end DegreeOf
section TotalDegree
/-! ### `totalDegree` -/
/-- `totalDegree p` gives the maximum |s| over the monomials X^s in `p` -/
def totalDegree (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
p.support.sup fun s => s.sum fun _ e => e
theorem totalDegree_eq (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.totalDegree = p.support.sup fun m => Multiset.card (toMultiset m) := by
rw [totalDegree]
congr; funext m
exact (Finsupp.card_toMultiset _).symm
theorem le_totalDegree {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {s : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : s ∈ p.support) :
(s.sum fun _ e => e) ≤ totalDegree p :=
Finset.le_sup (α := ℕ) (f := fun s => sum s fun _ e => e) h
theorem totalDegree_le_degrees_card (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.totalDegree ≤ Multiset.card p.degrees := by
classical
rw [totalDegree_eq]
exact Finset.sup_le fun s hs => Multiset.card_le_card <| Finset.le_sup hs
theorem totalDegree_le_of_support_subset (h : p.support ⊆ q.support) :
totalDegree p ≤ totalDegree q :=
Finset.sup_mono h
|
@[simp]
theorem totalDegree_C (a : R) : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R).totalDegree = 0 :=
(supDegree_single 0 a).trans <| by rw [sum_zero_index, bot_eq_zero', ite_self]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 369 | 373 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Roberto Alvarez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Roberto Alvarez
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.FundamentalGroupoid.FundamentalGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.EckmannHilton
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# `n`th homotopy group
We define the `n`th homotopy group at `x : X`, `π_n X x`, as the equivalence classes
of functions from the `n`-dimensional cube to the topological space `X`
that send the boundary to the base point `x`, up to homotopic equivalence.
Note that such functions are generalized loops `GenLoop (Fin n) x`; in particular
`GenLoop (Fin 1) x ≃ Path x x`.
We show that `π_0 X x` is equivalent to the path-connected components, and
that `π_1 X x` is equivalent to the fundamental group at `x`.
We provide a group instance using path composition and show commutativity when `n > 1`.
## definitions
* `GenLoop N x` is the type of continuous functions `I^N → X` that send the boundary to `x`,
* `HomotopyGroup.Pi n X x` denoted `π_ n X x` is the quotient of `GenLoop (Fin n) x` by
homotopy relative to the boundary,
* group instance `Group (π_(n+1) X x)`,
* commutative group instance `CommGroup (π_(n+2) X x)`.
TODO:
* `Ω^M (Ω^N X) ≃ₜ Ω^(M⊕N) X`, and `Ω^M X ≃ₜ Ω^N X` when `M ≃ N`. Similarly for `π_`.
* Path-induced homomorphisms. Show that `HomotopyGroup.pi1EquivFundamentalGroup`
is a group isomorphism.
* Examples with `𝕊^n`: `π_n (𝕊^n) = ℤ`, `π_m (𝕊^n)` trivial for `m < n`.
* Actions of π_1 on π_n.
* Lie algebra: `⁅π_(n+1), π_(m+1)⁆` contained in `π_(n+m+1)`.
-/
open scoped unitInterval Topology
open Homeomorph
noncomputable section
/-- `I^N` is notation (in the Topology namespace) for `N → I`,
i.e. the unit cube indexed by a type `N`. -/
scoped[Topology] notation "I^" N => N → I
namespace Cube
/-- The points in a cube with at least one projection equal to 0 or 1. -/
def boundary (N : Type*) : Set (I^N) :=
{y | ∃ i, y i = 0 ∨ y i = 1}
variable {N : Type*} [DecidableEq N]
/-- The forward direction of the homeomorphism
between the cube $I^N$ and $I × I^{N\setminus\{j\}}$. -/
abbrev splitAt (i : N) : (I^N) ≃ₜ I × I^{ j // j ≠ i } :=
funSplitAt I i
/-- The backward direction of the homeomorphism
between the cube $I^N$ and $I × I^{N\setminus\{j\}}$. -/
abbrev insertAt (i : N) : (I × I^{ j // j ≠ i }) ≃ₜ I^N :=
(funSplitAt I i).symm
theorem insertAt_boundary (i : N) {t₀ : I} {t}
(H : (t₀ = 0 ∨ t₀ = 1) ∨ t ∈ boundary { j // j ≠ i }) : insertAt i ⟨t₀, t⟩ ∈ boundary N := by
obtain H | ⟨j, H⟩ := H
· use i; rwa [funSplitAt_symm_apply, dif_pos rfl]
· use j; rwa [funSplitAt_symm_apply, dif_neg j.prop, Subtype.coe_eta]
end Cube
variable (N X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] (x : X)
/-- The space of paths with both endpoints equal to a specified point `x : X`.
Denoted as `Ω`, within the `Topology.Homotopy` namespace. -/
abbrev LoopSpace :=
Path x x
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Topology.Homotopy] notation "Ω" => LoopSpace
instance LoopSpace.inhabited : Inhabited (Path x x) :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
/-- The `n`-dimensional generalized loops based at `x` in a space `X` are
continuous functions `I^n → X` that sends the boundary to `x`.
We allow an arbitrary indexing type `N` in place of `Fin n` here. -/
def GenLoop : Set C(I^N, X) :=
{p | ∀ y ∈ Cube.boundary N, p y = x}
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Topology.Homotopy] notation "Ω^" => GenLoop
open Topology.Homotopy
variable {N X x}
namespace GenLoop
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Ω^ N X x) (I^N) X where
coe f := f.1
coe_injective' := fun ⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩ _ => by congr
@[ext]
theorem ext (f g : Ω^ N X x) (H : ∀ y, f y = g y) : f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_injective' (funext H)
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (f : C(I^N, X)) (H y) : (⟨f, H⟩ : Ω^ N X x) y = f y :=
rfl
instance instContinuousEval : ContinuousEval (Ω^ N X x) (I^N) X :=
.of_continuous_forget continuous_subtype_val
instance instContinuousEvalConst : ContinuousEvalConst (Ω^ N X x) (I^N) X := inferInstance
/-- Copy of a `GenLoop` with a new map from the unit cube equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
def copy (f : Ω^ N X x) (g : (I^N) → X) (h : g = f) : Ω^ N X x :=
⟨⟨g, h.symm ▸ f.1.2⟩, by convert f.2⟩
/- porting note: this now requires the `instFunLike` instance,
so the instance is now put before `copy`. -/
theorem coe_copy (f : Ω^ N X x) {g : (I^N) → X} (h : g = f) : ⇑(copy f g h) = g :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : Ω^ N X x) {g : (I^N) → X} (h : g = f) : copy f g h = f := by
ext x
exact congr_fun h x
theorem boundary (f : Ω^ N X x) : ∀ y ∈ Cube.boundary N, f y = x :=
f.2
/-- The constant `GenLoop` at `x`. -/
def const : Ω^ N X x :=
⟨ContinuousMap.const _ x, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply {t} : (@const N X _ x) t = x :=
rfl
instance inhabited : Inhabited (Ω^ N X x) :=
⟨const⟩
/-- The "homotopic relative to boundary" relation between `GenLoop`s. -/
def Homotopic (f g : Ω^ N X x) : Prop :=
f.1.HomotopicRel g.1 (Cube.boundary N)
namespace Homotopic
variable {f g h : Ω^ N X x}
@[refl]
theorem refl (f : Ω^ N X x) : Homotopic f f :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopicRel.refl _
@[symm]
nonrec theorem symm (H : Homotopic f g) : Homotopic g f :=
H.symm
@[trans]
nonrec theorem trans (H0 : Homotopic f g) (H1 : Homotopic g h) : Homotopic f h :=
H0.trans H1
theorem equiv : Equivalence (@Homotopic N X _ x) :=
⟨Homotopic.refl, Homotopic.symm, Homotopic.trans⟩
instance setoid (N) (x : X) : Setoid (Ω^ N X x) :=
⟨Homotopic, equiv⟩
end Homotopic
section LoopHomeo
variable [DecidableEq N]
/-- Loop from a generalized loop by currying $I^N → X$ into $I → (I^{N\setminus\{j\}} → X)$. -/
@[simps]
def toLoop (i : N) (p : Ω^ N X x) : Ω (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const where
toFun t :=
⟨(p.val.comp (Cube.insertAt i)).curry t, fun y yH =>
p.property (Cube.insertAt i (t, y)) (Cube.insertAt_boundary i <| Or.inr yH)⟩
source' := by ext t; refine p.property (Cube.insertAt i (0, t)) ⟨i, Or.inl ?_⟩; simp
target' := by ext t; refine p.property (Cube.insertAt i (1, t)) ⟨i, Or.inr ?_⟩; simp
theorem continuous_toLoop (i : N) : Continuous (@toLoop N X _ x _ i) :=
Path.continuous_uncurry_iff.1 <|
Continuous.subtype_mk
(continuous_eval.comp <|
Continuous.prodMap
(ContinuousMap.continuous_curry.comp <|
(ContinuousMap.continuous_precomp _).comp continuous_subtype_val)
continuous_id)
_
/-- Generalized loop from a loop by uncurrying $I → (I^{N\setminus\{j\}} → X)$ into $I^N → X$. -/
@[simps]
def fromLoop (i : N) (p : Ω (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const) : Ω^ N X x :=
⟨(ContinuousMap.comp ⟨Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩ p.toContinuousMap).uncurry.comp
(Cube.splitAt i),
by
rintro y ⟨j, Hj⟩
simp only [ContinuousMap.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_coe,
funSplitAt_apply, ContinuousMap.uncurry_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk,
Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
obtain rfl | Hne := eq_or_ne j i
· rcases Hj with Hj | Hj <;> simp only [Hj, p.coe_toContinuousMap, p.source, p.target] <;> rfl
· exact GenLoop.boundary _ _ ⟨⟨j, Hne⟩, Hj⟩⟩
theorem continuous_fromLoop (i : N) : Continuous (@fromLoop N X _ x _ i) :=
((ContinuousMap.continuous_precomp _).comp <|
ContinuousMap.continuous_uncurry.comp <|
(ContinuousMap.continuous_postcomp _).comp continuous_induced_dom).subtype_mk
_
theorem to_from (i : N) (p : Ω (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const) : toLoop i (fromLoop i p) = p := by
simp_rw [toLoop, fromLoop, ContinuousMap.comp_assoc,
toContinuousMap_comp_symm, ContinuousMap.comp_id]
ext; rfl
/-- The `n+1`-dimensional loops are in bijection with the loops in the space of
`n`-dimensional loops with base point `const`.
We allow an arbitrary indexing type `N` in place of `Fin n` here. -/
@[simps]
def loopHomeo (i : N) : Ω^ N X x ≃ₜ Ω (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const where
toFun := toLoop i
invFun := fromLoop i
left_inv p := by ext; exact congr_arg p (by dsimp; exact Equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _)
right_inv := to_from i
continuous_toFun := continuous_toLoop i
continuous_invFun := continuous_fromLoop i
theorem toLoop_apply (i : N) {p : Ω^ N X x} {t} {tn} :
toLoop i p t tn = p (Cube.insertAt i ⟨t, tn⟩) :=
rfl
theorem fromLoop_apply (i : N) {p : Ω (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const} {t : I^N} :
fromLoop i p t = p (t i) (Cube.splitAt i t).snd :=
rfl
/-- Composition with `Cube.insertAt` as a continuous map. -/
abbrev cCompInsert (i : N) : C(C(I^N, X), C(I × I^{ j // j ≠ i }, X)) :=
⟨fun f => f.comp (Cube.insertAt i),
(toContinuousMap <| Cube.insertAt i).continuous_precomp⟩
/-- A homotopy between `n+1`-dimensional loops `p` and `q` constant on the boundary
seen as a homotopy between two paths in the space of `n`-dimensional paths. -/
def homotopyTo (i : N) {p q : Ω^ N X x} (H : p.1.HomotopyRel q.1 (Cube.boundary N)) :
C(I × I, C(I^{ j // j ≠ i }, X)) :=
((⟨_, ContinuousMap.continuous_curry⟩ : C(_, _)).comp <|
(cCompInsert i).comp H.toContinuousMap.curry).uncurry
-- porting note: `@[simps]` generates this lemma but it's named `homotopyTo_apply_apply` instead
theorem homotopyTo_apply (i : N) {p q : Ω^ N X x} (H : p.1.HomotopyRel q.1 <| Cube.boundary N)
(t : I × I) (tₙ : I^{ j // j ≠ i }) :
homotopyTo i H t tₙ = H (t.fst, Cube.insertAt i (t.snd, tₙ)) :=
rfl
theorem homotopicTo (i : N) {p q : Ω^ N X x} :
Homotopic p q → (toLoop i p).Homotopic (toLoop i q) := by
refine Nonempty.map fun H => ⟨⟨⟨fun t => ⟨homotopyTo i H t, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro y ⟨i, iH⟩
rw [homotopyTo_apply, H.eq_fst, p.2]
all_goals apply Cube.insertAt_boundary; right; exact ⟨i, iH⟩
· fun_prop
iterate 2
intro
ext
dsimp
rw [homotopyTo_apply, toLoop_apply]
swap
· apply H.apply_zero
· apply H.apply_one
intro t y yH
ext
dsimp
rw [homotopyTo_apply]
apply H.eq_fst; use i
rw [funSplitAt_symm_apply, dif_pos rfl]; exact yH
/-- The converse to `GenLoop.homotopyTo`: a homotopy between two loops in the space of
`n`-dimensional loops can be seen as a homotopy between two `n+1`-dimensional paths. -/
@[simps!] def homotopyFrom (i : N) {p q : Ω^ N X x} (H : (toLoop i p).Homotopy (toLoop i q)) :
C(I × I^N, X) :=
(ContinuousMap.comp ⟨_, ContinuousMap.continuous_uncurry⟩
(ContinuousMap.comp ⟨Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩ H.toContinuousMap).curry).uncurry.comp <|
(ContinuousMap.id I).prodMap (Cube.splitAt i)
theorem homotopicFrom (i : N) {p q : Ω^ N X x} :
(toLoop i p).Homotopic (toLoop i q) → Homotopic p q := by
refine Nonempty.map fun H => ⟨⟨homotopyFrom i H, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
pick_goal 3
· rintro t y ⟨j, jH⟩
erw [homotopyFrom_apply]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne j i
· simp only [Prod.map_apply, id_eq, funSplitAt_apply, Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
rw [H.eq_fst]
exacts [congr_arg p ((Cube.splitAt j).left_inv _), jH]
· rw [p.2 _ ⟨j, jH⟩]; apply boundary; exact ⟨⟨j, h⟩, jH⟩
all_goals
intro
apply (homotopyFrom_apply _ _ _).trans
simp only [Prod.map_apply, id_eq, funSplitAt_apply,
Function.uncurry_apply_pair, ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith.apply_zero,
ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith.apply_one, ne_eq, Path.coe_toContinuousMap, toLoop_apply_coe,
ContinuousMap.curry_apply, ContinuousMap.comp_apply]
first
| apply congr_arg p
| apply congr_arg q
apply (Cube.splitAt i).left_inv
/-- Concatenation of two `GenLoop`s along the `i`th coordinate. -/
def transAt (i : N) (f g : Ω^ N X x) : Ω^ N X x :=
copy (fromLoop i <| (toLoop i f).trans <| toLoop i g)
(fun t => if (t i : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2
then f (Function.update t i <| Set.projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (2 * t i))
else g (Function.update t i <| Set.projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (2 * t i - 1)))
(by
ext1; symm
dsimp only [Path.trans, fromLoop, Path.coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, mk_apply,
ContinuousMap.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_coe, funSplitAt_apply,
ContinuousMap.uncurry_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk, Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
split_ifs
· show f _ = _; congr 1
· show g _ = _; congr 1)
/-- Reversal of a `GenLoop` along the `i`th coordinate. -/
def symmAt (i : N) (f : Ω^ N X x) : Ω^ N X x :=
(copy (fromLoop i (toLoop i f).symm) fun t => f fun j => if j = i then σ (t i) else t j) <| by
ext1; change _ = f _; congr; ext1; simp
theorem transAt_distrib {i j : N} (h : i ≠ j) (a b c d : Ω^ N X x) :
transAt i (transAt j a b) (transAt j c d) = transAt j (transAt i a c) (transAt i b d) := by
ext; simp_rw [transAt, coe_copy, Function.update_apply, if_neg h, if_neg h.symm]
split_ifs <;>
· congr 1; ext1; simp only [Function.update, eq_rec_constant, dite_eq_ite]
apply ite_ite_comm; rintro rfl; exact h.symm
theorem fromLoop_trans_toLoop {i : N} {p q : Ω^ N X x} :
fromLoop i ((toLoop i p).trans <| toLoop i q) = transAt i p q :=
(copy_eq _ _).symm
theorem fromLoop_symm_toLoop {i : N} {p : Ω^ N X x} : fromLoop i (toLoop i p).symm = symmAt i p :=
(copy_eq _ _).symm
end LoopHomeo
end GenLoop
/-- The `n`th homotopy group at `x` defined as the quotient of `Ω^n x` by the
`GenLoop.Homotopic` relation. -/
def HomotopyGroup (N X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] (x : X) : Type _ :=
Quotient (GenLoop.Homotopic.setoid N x)
instance : Inhabited (HomotopyGroup N X x) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited <| Quotient (GenLoop.Homotopic.setoid N x)
variable [DecidableEq N]
open GenLoop
/-- Equivalence between the homotopy group of X and the fundamental group of
`Ω^{j // j ≠ i} x`. -/
def homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroup (i : N) :
HomotopyGroup N X x ≃ FundamentalGroup (Ω^ { j // j ≠ i } X x) const := by
refine Equiv.trans ?_ (CategoryTheory.Groupoid.isoEquivHom _ _).symm
apply Quotient.congr (loopHomeo i).toEquiv
exact fun p q => ⟨homotopicTo i, homotopicFrom i⟩
/-- Homotopy group of finite index, denoted as `π_n` within the Topology namespace. -/
abbrev HomotopyGroup.Pi (n) (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] (x : X) :=
HomotopyGroup (Fin n) _ x
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Topology] notation "π_" => HomotopyGroup.Pi
/-- The 0-dimensional generalized loops based at `x` are in bijection with `X`. -/
def genLoopHomeoOfIsEmpty (N x) [IsEmpty N] : Ω^ N X x ≃ₜ X where
toFun f := f 0
invFun y := ⟨ContinuousMap.const _ y, fun _ ⟨i, _⟩ => isEmptyElim i⟩
left_inv f := by ext; exact congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
right_inv _ := rfl
continuous_invFun := ContinuousMap.const'.2.subtype_mk _
/-- The homotopy "group" indexed by an empty type is in bijection with
the path components of `X`, aka the `ZerothHomotopy`. -/
def homotopyGroupEquivZerothHomotopyOfIsEmpty (N x) [IsEmpty N] :
HomotopyGroup N X x ≃ ZerothHomotopy X :=
Quotient.congr (genLoopHomeoOfIsEmpty N x).toEquiv
(by
-- joined iff homotopic
intros a₁ a₂
constructor <;> rintro ⟨H⟩
exacts
[⟨{ toFun := fun t => H ⟨t, isEmptyElim⟩
source' := (H.apply_zero _).trans (congr_arg a₁ <| Subsingleton.elim _ _)
target' := (H.apply_one _).trans (congr_arg a₂ <| Subsingleton.elim _ _) }⟩,
⟨{ toFun := fun t0 => H t0.fst
map_zero_left := fun _ => H.source.trans (congr_arg a₁ <| Subsingleton.elim _ _)
map_one_left := fun _ => H.target.trans (congr_arg a₂ <| Subsingleton.elim _ _)
prop' := fun _ _ ⟨i, _⟩ => isEmptyElim i }⟩])
/-- The 0th homotopy "group" is in bijection with `ZerothHomotopy`. -/
def HomotopyGroup.pi0EquivZerothHomotopy : π_ 0 X x ≃ ZerothHomotopy X :=
homotopyGroupEquivZerothHomotopyOfIsEmpty (Fin 0) x
/-- The 1-dimensional generalized loops based at `x` are in bijection with loops at `x`. -/
def genLoopEquivOfUnique (N) [Unique N] : Ω^ N X x ≃ Ω X x where
toFun p :=
Path.mk ⟨fun t => p fun _ => t, by continuity⟩
(GenLoop.boundary _ (fun _ => 0) ⟨default, Or.inl rfl⟩)
(GenLoop.boundary _ (fun _ => 1) ⟨default, Or.inr rfl⟩)
invFun p :=
⟨⟨fun c => p (c default), by continuity⟩,
by
rintro y ⟨i, iH | iH⟩ <;> cases Unique.eq_default i <;> apply (congr_arg p iH).trans
exacts [p.source, p.target]⟩
left_inv p := by ext y; exact congr_arg p (eq_const_of_unique y).symm
right_inv p := by ext; rfl
/- TODO (?): deducing this from `homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroup` would require
combination of `CategoryTheory.Functor.mapAut` and
`FundamentalGroupoid.fundamentalGroupoidFunctor` applied to `genLoopHomeoOfIsEmpty`,
with possibly worse defeq. -/
/-- The homotopy group at `x` indexed by a singleton is in bijection with the fundamental group,
i.e. the loops based at `x` up to homotopy. -/
def homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroupOfUnique (N) [Unique N] :
HomotopyGroup N X x ≃ FundamentalGroup X x := by
refine Equiv.trans ?_ (CategoryTheory.Groupoid.isoEquivHom _ _).symm
refine Quotient.congr (genLoopEquivOfUnique N) ?_
intros a₁ a₂; constructor <;> rintro ⟨H⟩
· exact
⟨{ toFun := fun tx => H (tx.fst, fun _ => tx.snd)
map_zero_left := fun _ => H.apply_zero _
map_one_left := fun _ => H.apply_one _
prop' := fun t y iH => H.prop' _ _ ⟨default, iH⟩ }⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨⟨fun tx => H (tx.fst, tx.snd default), H.continuous.comp ?_⟩, fun y => ?_, fun y => ?_⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· fun_prop
· exact (H.apply_zero _).trans (congr_arg a₁ (eq_const_of_unique y).symm)
· exact (H.apply_one _).trans (congr_arg a₂ (eq_const_of_unique y).symm)
· rintro t y ⟨i, iH⟩
cases Unique.eq_default i
exact (H.eq_fst _ iH).trans (congr_arg a₁ (eq_const_of_unique y).symm)
/-- The first homotopy group at `x` is in bijection with the fundamental group. -/
def HomotopyGroup.pi1EquivFundamentalGroup : π_ 1 X x ≃ FundamentalGroup X x :=
homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroupOfUnique (Fin 1)
namespace HomotopyGroup
/-- Group structure on `HomotopyGroup N X x` for nonempty `N` (in particular `π_(n+1) X x`). -/
instance group (N) [DecidableEq N] [Nonempty N] : Group (HomotopyGroup N X x) :=
(homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroup <| Classical.arbitrary N).group
/-- Group structure on `HomotopyGroup` obtained by pulling back path composition along the
`i`th direction. The group structures for two different `i j : N` distribute over each
other, and therefore are equal by the Eckmann-Hilton argument. -/
abbrev auxGroup (i : N) : Group (HomotopyGroup N X x) :=
(homotopyGroupEquivFundamentalGroup i).group
theorem isUnital_auxGroup (i : N) :
EckmannHilton.IsUnital (auxGroup i).mul (⟦const⟧ : HomotopyGroup N X x) where
left_id := (auxGroup i).one_mul
right_id := (auxGroup i).mul_one
theorem auxGroup_indep (i j : N) : (auxGroup i : Group (HomotopyGroup N X x)) = auxGroup j := by
by_cases h : i = j; · rw [h]
refine Group.ext (EckmannHilton.mul (isUnital_auxGroup i) (isUnital_auxGroup j) ?_)
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ ⟨d⟩
change Quotient.mk' _ = _
apply congr_arg Quotient.mk'
simp only [fromLoop_trans_toLoop, transAt_distrib h, coe_toEquiv, loopHomeo_apply,
coe_symm_toEquiv, loopHomeo_symm_apply]
theorem transAt_indep {i} (j) (f g : Ω^ N X x) :
(⟦transAt i f g⟧ : HomotopyGroup N X x) = ⟦transAt j f g⟧ := by
simp_rw [← fromLoop_trans_toLoop]
let m := fun (G) (_ : Group G) => ((· * ·) : G → G → G)
exact congr_fun₂ (congr_arg (m <| HomotopyGroup N X x) <| auxGroup_indep i j) ⟦g⟧ ⟦f⟧
theorem symmAt_indep {i} (j) (f : Ω^ N X x) :
(⟦symmAt i f⟧ : HomotopyGroup N X x) = ⟦symmAt j f⟧ := by
simp_rw [← fromLoop_symm_toLoop]
let inv := fun (G) (_ : Group G) => ((·⁻¹) : G → G)
exact congr_fun (congr_arg (inv <| HomotopyGroup N X x) <| auxGroup_indep i j) ⟦f⟧
/-- Characterization of multiplicative identity -/
theorem one_def [Nonempty N] : (1 : HomotopyGroup N X x) = ⟦const⟧ :=
rfl
/-- Characterization of multiplication -/
theorem mul_spec [Nonempty N] {i} {p q : Ω^ N X x} :
-- TODO: introduce `HomotopyGroup.mk` and remove defeq abuse.
((· * ·) : _ → _ → HomotopyGroup N X x) ⟦p⟧ ⟦q⟧ = ⟦transAt i q p⟧ := by
rw [transAt_indep (Classical.arbitrary N) q, ← fromLoop_trans_toLoop]
apply Quotient.sound
rfl
/-- Characterization of multiplicative inverse -/
theorem inv_spec [Nonempty N] {i} {p : Ω^ N X x} :
((⟦p⟧)⁻¹ : HomotopyGroup N X x) = ⟦symmAt i p⟧ := by
rw [symmAt_indep (Classical.arbitrary N) p, ← fromLoop_symm_toLoop]
apply Quotient.sound
rfl
/-- Multiplication on `HomotopyGroup N X x` is commutative for nontrivial `N`.
In particular, multiplication on `π_(n+2)` is commutative. -/
instance commGroup [Nontrivial N] : CommGroup (HomotopyGroup N X x) :=
let h := exists_ne (Classical.arbitrary N)
@EckmannHilton.commGroup (HomotopyGroup N X x) _ 1 (isUnital_auxGroup <| Classical.choose h) _
(by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ ⟨d⟩
apply congr_arg Quotient.mk'
simp only [fromLoop_trans_toLoop, transAt_distrib <| Classical.choose_spec h, coe_toEquiv,
loopHomeo_apply, coe_symm_toEquiv, loopHomeo_symm_apply])
end HomotopyGroup
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/HomotopyGroup.lean | 548 | 553 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Emily Riehl
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.TwoSquare
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.HomCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Mate of natural transformations
This file establishes the bijection between the 2-cells
```
L₁ R₁
C --→ D C ←-- D
G ↓ ↗ ↓ H G ↓ ↘ ↓ H
E --→ F E ←-- F
L₂ R₂
```
where `L₁ ⊣ R₁` and `L₂ ⊣ R₂`. The corresponding natural transformations are called mates.
This bijection includes a number of interesting cases as specializations. For instance, in the
special case where `G,H` are identity functors then the bijection preserves and reflects
isomorphisms (i.e. we have bijections`(L₂ ⟶ L₁) ≃ (R₁ ⟶ R₂)`, and if either side is an iso then the
other side is as well). This demonstrates that adjoints to a given functor are unique up to
isomorphism (since if `L₁ ≅ L₂` then we deduce `R₁ ≅ R₂`).
Another example arises from considering the square representing that a functor `H` preserves
products, in particular the morphism `HA ⨯ H- ⟶ H(A ⨯ -)`. Then provided `(A ⨯ -)` and `HA ⨯ -`
have left adjoints (for instance if the relevant categories are cartesian closed), the transferred
natural transformation is the exponential comparison morphism: `H(A ^ -) ⟶ HA ^ H-`.
Furthermore if `H` has a left adjoint `L`, this morphism is an isomorphism iff its mate
`L(HA ⨯ -) ⟶ A ⨯ L-` is an isomorphism, see
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Frobenius+reciprocity#InCategoryTheory.
This also relates to Grothendieck's yoga of six operations, though this is not spelled out in
mathlib: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/six+operations.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ v₅ v₆ v₇ v₈ v₉ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄ u₅ u₆ u₇ u₈ u₉
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Functor Adjunction NatTrans TwoSquare
section mateEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} {E : Type u₃} {F : Type u₄}
variable [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] [Category.{v₃} E] [Category.{v₄} F]
variable {G : C ⥤ E} {H : D ⥤ F} {L₁ : C ⥤ D} {R₁ : D ⥤ C} {L₂ : E ⥤ F} {R₂ : F ⥤ E}
variable (adj₁ : L₁ ⊣ R₁) (adj₂ : L₂ ⊣ R₂)
/-- Suppose we have a square of functors (where the top and bottom are adjunctions `L₁ ⊣ R₁`
and `L₂ ⊣ R₂` respectively).
```
C ↔ D
G ↓ ↓ H
E ↔ F
```
Then we have a bijection between natural transformations `G ⋙ L₂ ⟶ L₁ ⋙ H` and
`R₁ ⋙ G ⟶ H ⋙ R₂`. This can be seen as a bijection of the 2-cells:
```
L₁ R₁
C --→ D C ←-- D
G ↓ ↗ ↓ H G ↓ ↘ ↓ H
E --→ F E ←-- F
L₂ R₂
```
Note that if one of the transformations is an iso, it does not imply the other is an iso.
-/
@[simps]
def mateEquiv : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H ≃ TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂ where
toFun α := .mk _ _ _ _ <|
whiskerLeft (R₁ ⋙ G) adj₂.unit ≫
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft R₁ α.natTrans) R₂ ≫
whiskerRight adj₁.counit (H ⋙ R₂)
invFun β := .mk _ _ _ _ <|
whiskerRight adj₁.unit (G ⋙ L₂) ≫
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft L₁ β.natTrans) L₂ ≫
whiskerLeft (L₁ ⋙ H) adj₂.counit
left_inv α := by
ext
unfold whiskerRight whiskerLeft
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, comp_app, map_comp, assoc, counit_naturality,
counit_naturality_assoc, left_triangle_components_assoc]
rw [← assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, α.natTrans.naturality, Functor.comp_map, assoc, ← H.map_comp,
left_triangle_components, map_id]
simp only [comp_obj, comp_id]
right_inv β := by
ext
unfold whiskerLeft whiskerRight
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, comp_app, map_comp, assoc,
unit_naturality_assoc, right_triangle_components_assoc]
rw [← assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, assoc, ← β.natTrans.naturality, ← assoc, Functor.comp_map,
← G.map_comp, right_triangle_components, map_id, id_comp]
/-- A component of a transposed version of the mates correspondence. -/
theorem mateEquiv_counit (α : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H) (d : D) :
L₂.map ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α).app _) ≫ adj₂.counit.app _ =
α.app _ ≫ H.map (adj₁.counit.app d) := by simp
/-- A component of a transposed version of the inverse mates correspondence. -/
theorem mateEquiv_counit_symm (α : TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂) (d : D) :
L₂.map (α.app _) ≫ adj₂.counit.app _ =
((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α).app _ ≫ H.map (adj₁.counit.app d) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).right_inv α]
exact (mateEquiv_counit adj₁ adj₂ ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α) d)
/- A component of a transposed version of the mates correspondence. -/
theorem unit_mateEquiv (α : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H) (c : C) :
G.map (adj₁.unit.app c) ≫ (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α).app _ =
adj₂.unit.app _ ≫ R₂.map (α.app _) := by
dsimp [mateEquiv]
rw [← adj₂.unit_naturality_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, ← Functor.comp_map G L₂, α.naturality]
rw [R₂.map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, Functor.comp_map L₁ H, ← H.map_comp, left_triangle_components]
simp only [comp_obj, map_id, comp_id]
/-- A component of a transposed version of the inverse mates correspondence. -/
theorem unit_mateEquiv_symm (α : TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂) (c : C) :
G.map (adj₁.unit.app c) ≫ α.app _ =
adj₂.unit.app _ ≫ R₂.map (((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α).app _) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).right_inv α]
exact (unit_mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α) c)
end mateEquiv
section mateEquivVComp
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} {C : Type u₃} {D : Type u₄} {E : Type u₅} {F : Type u₆}
variable [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B] [Category.{v₃} C]
variable [Category.{v₄} D] [Category.{v₅} E] [Category.{v₆} F]
variable {G₁ : A ⥤ C} {G₂ : C ⥤ E} {H₁ : B ⥤ D} {H₂ : D ⥤ F}
variable {L₁ : A ⥤ B} {R₁ : B ⥤ A} {L₂ : C ⥤ D} {R₂ : D ⥤ C} {L₃ : E ⥤ F} {R₃ : F ⥤ E}
variable (adj₁ : L₁ ⊣ R₁) (adj₂ : L₂ ⊣ R₂) (adj₃ : L₃ ⊣ R₃)
/-- The mates equivalence commutes with vertical composition. -/
theorem mateEquiv_vcomp (α : TwoSquare G₁ L₁ L₂ H₁) (β : TwoSquare G₂ L₂ L₃ H₂) :
(mateEquiv adj₁ adj₃) (α ≫ₕ β) = (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α) ≫ᵥ (mateEquiv adj₂ adj₃ β) := by
unfold hComp vComp mateEquiv
ext b
simp only [comp_obj, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_twice, whiskerRight_comp,
assoc, comp_app, whiskerLeft_app, whiskerRight_app, associator_hom_app, map_id,
associator_inv_app, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, id_comp, whiskerRight_twice, comp_id]
slice_rhs 1 4 => rw [← assoc, ← assoc, ← unit_naturality (adj₃)]
rw [L₃.map_comp, R₃.map_comp]
slice_rhs 2 4 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← R₃.map_comp, ← assoc, ← L₃.map_comp, ← G₂.map_comp, ← G₂.map_comp]
rw [← Functor.comp_map G₂ L₃, β.naturality]
rw [(L₂ ⋙ H₂).map_comp, R₃.map_comp, R₃.map_comp]
slice_rhs 4 5 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, Functor.comp_map L₂ _, ← Functor.comp_map _ L₂, ← H₂.map_comp]
rw [adj₂.counit.naturality]
| simp only [comp_obj, Functor.comp_map, map_comp, id_obj, Functor.id_map, assoc]
slice_rhs 4 5 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← H₂.map_comp, ← Functor.comp_map _ L₂, adj₂.counit.naturality]
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.id_map, map_comp, assoc]
slice_rhs 3 4 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← H₂.map_comp, left_triangle_components]
simp only [map_id, id_comp]
end mateEquivVComp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Mates.lean | 164 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Length
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Reflections, inversions, and inversion sequences
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
We define a *reflection* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`) to be an element of the form
$t = u s_i u^{-1}$, where $u \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. We say that a reflection $t$
is a *left inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`) of an element $w \in W$ if
$\ell(t w) < \ell(w)$, and we say it is a *right inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`) of
$w$ if $\ell(w t) > \ell(w)$. Here $\ell$ is the length function
(see `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean`).
Given a word, we define its *left inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`) and its
*right inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`). We prove that if a word is reduced, then
both of its inversion sequences contain no duplicates. In fact, the right (respectively, left)
inversion sequence of a reduced word for $w$ consists of all of the right (respectively, left)
inversions of $w$ in some order, but we do not prove that in this file.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`
* `CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
/-- `t : W` is a *reflection* of the Coxeter system `cs` if it is of the form
$w s_i w^{-1}$, where $w \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. -/
def IsReflection (t : W) : Prop := ∃ w i, t = w * s i * w⁻¹
theorem isReflection_simple (i : B) : cs.IsReflection (s i) := by use 1, i; simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem pow_two : t ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem mul_self : t * t = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem inv : t⁻¹ = t := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem isReflection_inv : cs.IsReflection t⁻¹ := by rwa [ht.inv]
theorem odd_length : Odd (ℓ t) := by
suffices cs.lengthParity t = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 by
simpa [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, ZMod.eq_one_iff_odd]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_left_ne (w : W) : ℓ (w * t) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (w * t) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_right_ne (w : W) : ℓ (t * w) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (t * w) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem conj (w : W) : cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) := by
obtain ⟨u, i, rfl⟩ := ht
use w * u, i
group
end IsReflection
@[simp]
theorem isReflection_conj_iff (w t : W) :
cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) ↔ cs.IsReflection t := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa [← mul_assoc] using h.conj w⁻¹
· exact IsReflection.conj (w := w)
/-- The proposition that `t` is a right inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (w t) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsRightInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (w * t) < ℓ w
/-- The proposition that `t` is a left inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (t w) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsLeftInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (t * w) < ℓ w
theorem isRightInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
apply and_congr_right
intro ht
rw [← length_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, ht.inv, cs.length_inv w]
theorem isLeftInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
convert cs.isRightInversion_inv_iff.symm
simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ ¬cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
unfold IsRightInversion
simp only [mul_assoc, ht.inv, ht.mul_self, mul_one, ht, true_and, not_lt]
constructor
· exact le_of_lt
· exact (lt_of_le_of_ne' · (ht.length_mul_left_ne w))
theorem not_isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t :=
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff.not_left
theorem isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ ¬cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
rw [← isRightInversion_inv_iff, ← isRightInversion_inv_iff, mul_inv_rev, ht.inv,
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff]
theorem not_isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t :=
ht.isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff.not_left
end IsReflection
@[simp]
theorem isRightInversion_simple_iff_isRightDescent (w : W) (i : B) :
cs.IsRightInversion w (s i) ↔ cs.IsRightDescent w i := by
simp [IsRightInversion, IsRightDescent, cs.isReflection_simple i]
@[simp]
theorem isLeftInversion_simple_iff_isLeftDescent (w : W) (i : B) :
cs.IsLeftInversion w (s i) ↔ cs.IsLeftDescent w i := by
simp [IsLeftInversion, IsLeftDescent, cs.isReflection_simple i]
/-- The right inversion sequence of `ω`. The right inversion sequence of a word
$s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}$ is the sequence
$$s_{i_\ell}\cdots s_{i_1}\cdots s_{i_\ell}, \ldots,
s_{i_{\ell}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_{\ell - 2}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_\ell}, \ldots,
s_{i_{\ell}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_\ell}, s_{i_\ell}.$$
-/
def rightInvSeq (ω : List B) : List W :=
match ω with
| [] => []
| i :: ω => (π ω)⁻¹ * (s i) * (π ω) :: rightInvSeq ω
/-- The left inversion sequence of `ω`. The left inversion sequence of a word
$s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}$ is the sequence
$$s_{i_1}, s_{i_1}s_{i_2}s_{i_1}, s_{i_1}s_{i_2}s_{i_3}s_{i_2}s_{i_1}, \ldots,
s_{i_1}\cdots s_{i_\ell}\cdots s_{i_1}.$$
-/
def leftInvSeq (ω : List B) : List W :=
match ω with
| [] => []
| i :: ω => s i :: List.map (MulAut.conj (s i)) (leftInvSeq ω)
local prefix:100 "ris" => cs.rightInvSeq
local prefix:100 "lis" => cs.leftInvSeq
@[simp] theorem rightInvSeq_nil : ris [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem leftInvSeq_nil : lis [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem rightInvSeq_singleton (i : B) : ris [i] = [s i] := by simp [rightInvSeq]
@[simp] theorem leftInvSeq_singleton (i : B) : lis [i] = [s i] := rfl
theorem rightInvSeq_concat (ω : List B) (i : B) :
ris (ω.concat i) = (List.map (MulAut.conj (s i)) (ris ω)).concat (s i) := by
induction' ω with j ω ih
· simp
· dsimp [rightInvSeq, concat]
rw [ih]
simp only [concat_eq_append, wordProd_append, wordProd_cons, wordProd_nil, mul_one, mul_inv_rev,
inv_simple, cons_append, cons.injEq, and_true]
group
private theorem leftInvSeq_eq_reverse_rightInvSeq_reverse (ω : List B) :
lis ω = (ris ω.reverse).reverse := by
induction' ω with i ω ih
· simp
· rw [leftInvSeq, reverse_cons, ← concat_eq_append, rightInvSeq_concat, ih]
simp [map_reverse]
theorem leftInvSeq_concat (ω : List B) (i : B) :
lis (ω.concat i) = (lis ω).concat ((π ω) * (s i) * (π ω)⁻¹) := by
simp [leftInvSeq_eq_reverse_rightInvSeq_reverse, rightInvSeq]
theorem rightInvSeq_reverse (ω : List B) :
ris (ω.reverse) = (lis ω).reverse := by
simp [leftInvSeq_eq_reverse_rightInvSeq_reverse]
theorem leftInvSeq_reverse (ω : List B) :
lis (ω.reverse) = (ris ω).reverse := by
simp [leftInvSeq_eq_reverse_rightInvSeq_reverse]
| @[simp] theorem length_rightInvSeq (ω : List B) : (ris ω).length = ω.length := by
induction' ω with i ω ih
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Inversion.lean | 240 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LinearMapPiProd
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Basic
/-!
# Continuous multilinear maps
We define continuous multilinear maps as maps from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂` which are multilinear
and continuous, by extending the space of multilinear maps with a continuity assumption.
Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type, and all these
spaces are also topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of continuous multilinear maps from
`(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`. We show that it is an `R`-module.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API of multilinear maps.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `M [×n]→L[R] M'` for the space of continuous `n`-multilinear maps from
`M^n` to `M'`. This is a particular case of the general notion (where we allow varying dependent
types as the arguments of our continuous multilinear maps), but arguably the most important one,
especially when defining iterated derivatives.
-/
open Function Fin Set
universe u v w w₁ w₁' w₂ w₃ w₄
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {n : ℕ} {M : Fin n.succ → Type w} {M₁ : ι → Type w₁}
{M₁' : ι → Type w₁'} {M₂ : Type w₂} {M₃ : Type w₃} {M₄ : Type w₄}
/-- Continuous multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂`
are modules over `R` with a topological structure. In applications, there will be compatibility
conditions between the algebraic and the topological structures, but this is not needed for the
definition. -/
structure ContinuousMultilinearMap (R : Type u) {ι : Type v} (M₁ : ι → Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂)
[Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] extends MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
cont : Continuous toFun
attribute [inherit_doc ContinuousMultilinearMap] ContinuousMultilinearMap.cont
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 M " [×" n "]→L[" R "] " M' => ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun i : Fin n => M) M'
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
[Module R M₄] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁' i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [TopologicalSpace M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₄]
(f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
theorem toMultilinearMap_injective :
Function.Injective
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
| ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, h => by subst h; rfl
instance funLike : FunLike (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' _ _ h := toMultilinearMap_injective <| MultilinearMap.coe_injective h
instance continuousMapClass :
ContinuousMapClass (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
map_continuous := ContinuousMultilinearMap.cont
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (L₁ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (v : ∀ i, M₁ i) : M₂ :=
L₁ v
initialize_simps_projections ContinuousMultilinearMap (-toMultilinearMap,
toMultilinearMap_toFun → apply)
@[continuity]
theorem coe_continuous : Continuous (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
f.cont
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe : (f.toMultilinearMap : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_add := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_smul := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_zero
instance : Zero (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨{ (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) with cont := continuous_const }⟩
instance : Inhabited (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_zero : (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂).toMultilinearMap = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {R' R'' A : Type*} [Monoid R'] [Monoid R''] [Semiring A] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [DistribMulAction R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
[DistribMulAction R'' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R'' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R'' M₂]
instance : SMul R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f => { c • f.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.const_smul c }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) (c : R') (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_smul (c : R') (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :
(c • f).toMultilinearMap = c • f.toMultilinearMap :=
rfl
instance [SMulCommClass R' R'' M₂] : SMulCommClass R' R'' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance [SMul R' R''] [IsScalarTower R' R'' M₂] :
IsScalarTower R' R'' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance [DistribMulAction R'ᵐᵒᵖ M₂] [IsCentralScalar R' M₂] :
IsCentralScalar R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
instance : MulAction R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.mulAction toMultilinearMap toMultilinearMap_injective fun _ _ => rfl
end SMul
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂]
instance : Add (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' => ⟨f.toMultilinearMap + f'.toMultilinearMap, f.cont.add f'.cont⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_add (f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(f + g).toMultilinearMap = f.toMultilinearMap + g.toMultilinearMap :=
rfl
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
toMultilinearMap_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Evaluation of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` at a vector as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def applyAddHom (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ M₂ where
toFun f := f m
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i)
{s : Finset α} : (∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m :=
map_sum (applyAddHom m) f s
end ContinuousAdd
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map, then `f.toContinuousLinearMap m i` is the continuous
linear map obtained by fixing all coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the
`i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps!] def toContinuousLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →L[R] M₂ :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.toLinearMap m i with
cont := f.cont.comp (continuous_const.update i continuous_id) }
/-- The cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps, as a continuous multilinear map. -/
def prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.prod g.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.prodMk g.cont }
@[simp]
theorem prod_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f.prod g) m = (f m, g m) :=
rfl
/-- Combine a family of continuous multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
continuous multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M' i)] (f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
cont := continuous_pi fun i => (f i).coe_continuous
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.pi fun i => (f i).toMultilinearMap
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : ⇑(pi f) = fun m j => f j m :=
rfl
theorem pi_apply {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (j : ι') : pi f m j = f j m :=
rfl
/-- Restrict the codomain of a continuous multilinear map to a submodule. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply_coe]
def codRestrict (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ p :=
⟨f.1.codRestrict p h, f.cont.subtype_mk _⟩
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- The natural equivalence between continuous linear maps from `M₂` to `M₃`
and continuous 1-multilinear maps from `M₂` to `M₃`. -/
@[simps! apply_toMultilinearMap apply_apply symm_apply_apply]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →L[R] M₃) ≃ ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃ where
toFun f := ⟨MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i f,
(map_continuous f).comp (continuous_apply i)⟩
invFun f := ⟨(MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i).symm f.toMultilinearMap,
(map_continuous f).comp <| continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_id⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := toMultilinearMap_injective <|
(MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i).apply_symm_apply f.toMultilinearMap
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _ m
cont := continuous_const
end
/-- If `g` is continuous multilinear and `f` is a collection of continuous linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a continuous multilinear map, that we call
`g.compContinuousLinearMap f`. -/
def compContinuousLinearMap (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁' M₄)
(f : ∀ i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₄ :=
{ g.toMultilinearMap.compLinearMap fun i => (f i).toLinearMap with
cont := g.cont.comp <| continuous_pi fun j => (f j).cont.comp <| continuous_apply _ }
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMap_apply (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁' M₄)
(f : ∀ i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compContinuousLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i <| m i :=
rfl
/-- Composing a continuous multilinear map with a continuous linear map gives again a
continuous multilinear map. -/
def _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃)
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ :=
{ g.toLinearMap.compMultilinearMap f.toMultilinearMap with cont := g.cont.comp f.cont }
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃)
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g.compContinuousMultilinearMap f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₃) =
(g : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) := by
ext m
rfl
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.prod` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply_fst symm_apply_snd, simps -isSimp symm_apply]
def prodEquiv :
(ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ × ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) ≃
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f,
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f)
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
theorem prod_ext_iff {f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)} :
f = g ↔ (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g ∧
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g := by
rw [← Prod.mk_inj, ← prodEquiv_symm_apply, ← prodEquiv_symm_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[ext]
theorem prod_ext {f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)}
(h₁ : (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g)
(h₂ : (ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g) : f = g :=
prod_ext_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem eq_prod_iff {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)}
{g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} {h : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃} :
f = g.prod h ↔ (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f = g ∧
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f = h :=
prod_ext_iff
theorem add_prod_add [ContinuousAdd M₂] [ContinuousAdd M₃]
(f₁ f₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g₁ g₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(f₁ + f₂).prod (g₁ + g₂) = f₁.prod g₁ + f₂.prod g₂ :=
rfl
theorem smul_prod_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [DistribMulAction S M₃]
[ContinuousConstSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
[ContinuousConstSMul S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(c : S) (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(c • f).prod (c • g) = c • f.prod g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_prod_zero :
(0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂).prod (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def piEquiv {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)] :
(∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) ≃ ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun := ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi
invFun f i := (ContinuousLinearMap.proj i : _ →L[R] M' i).compContinuousMultilinearMap f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines an equivalence between the spaces of continuous
multilinear maps. This is the forward map of this equivalence. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
nonrec def domDomCongr {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι' => M₂) M₃ where
toMultilinearMap := f.domDomCongr e
cont := f.cont.comp <| continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_apply _
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines an equivalence between the spaces of continuous
multilinear maps. In case of normed spaces, this is a linear isometric equivalence, see
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.domDomCongrₗᵢ`. -/
@[simps]
def domDomCongrEquiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃ ≃
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι' => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr e
invFun := domDomCongr e.symm
left_inv _ := ext fun _ => by simp
right_inv _ := ext fun _ => by simp
section linearDeriv
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x y : ∀ i, M₁ i)
/-- The derivative of a continuous multilinear map, as a continuous linear map
from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂`; see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasFDerivAt`. -/
def linearDeriv : (∀ i, M₁ i) →L[R] M₂ := ∑ i : ι, (f.toContinuousLinearMap x i).comp (.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply : f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (Function.update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv toContinuousLinearMap
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sum', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp',
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_mk', LinearMap.coe_mk, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, Finset.sum_apply]
rfl
end linearDeriv
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `(i : Fin (n+1)) → M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
additivity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_add m x y
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `(i : Fin (n+1)) → M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
multiplicativity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R)
(x : M 0) : f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_smul m c x
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_piecewise_add _ _ _
/-- Additivity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_add_univ _ _
section ApplySum
open Fintype Finset
variable {α : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the
sum of `f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_sum_finset _ _
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_sum _
end ApplySum
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := f.toMultilinearMap.restrictScalars R
cont := f.cont
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] (f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_update_sub _ _ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_sub := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_sub
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup M₂]
instance : Neg (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => { -f.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.neg }⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g => { f.toMultilinearMap - g.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.sub g.cont }⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - f') m = f m - f' m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
toMultilinearMap_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
theorem neg_prod_neg [AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₃]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup M₃] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) : (-f).prod (-g) = - f.prod g :=
rfl
theorem sub_prod_sub [AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₃]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup M₃] (f₁ f₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(g₁ g₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(f₁ - f₂).prod (g₁ - g₂) = f₁.prod g₁ - f₂.prod g₂ :=
rfl
end IsTopologicalAddGroup
end Ring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂]
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_piecewise_smul _ _ _
/-- Multiplicativity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i ↦ c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ _ _
end CommSemiring
section DistribMulAction
variable {R' R'' A : Type*} [Monoid R'] [Monoid R''] [Semiring A] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [DistribMulAction R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
[DistribMulAction R'' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R'' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R'' M₂]
instance [ContinuousAdd M₂] : DistribMulAction R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction
{ toFun := toMultilinearMap,
map_zero' := toMultilinearMap_zero,
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add }
toMultilinearMap_injective
fun _ _ => rfl
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable {R' A : Type*} [Semiring R'] [Semiring A] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [ContinuousAdd M₂] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [Module R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the
pointwise addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.module _
{ toFun := toMultilinearMap,
map_zero' := toMultilinearMap_zero,
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add }
toMultilinearMap_injective fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Linear map version of the map `toMultilinearMap` associating to a continuous multilinear map
the corresponding multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def toMultilinearMapLinear : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂ →ₗ[R'] MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂ where
toFun := toMultilinearMap
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := toMultilinearMap_smul
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def piLinearEquiv {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R' (M' i)]
[∀ i, Module A (M' i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass A R' (M' i)] [∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R' (M' i)] :
(∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ (M' i)) ≃ₗ[R'] ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ (∀ i, M' i) :=
{ piEquiv with
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
end Module
section CommAlgebra
variable (R ι) (A : Type*) [Fintype ι] [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^ι`, where `A` is a normed commutative algebra
over `𝕜`, associating to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
cont := continuous_finset_prod _ fun _ _ => continuous_apply _
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end CommAlgebra
section Algebra
variable (R n) (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[ContinuousMul A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^n`, where `A` is a normed algebra over `𝕜`, associating to
`m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also: `ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : A[×n]→L[R] A where
cont := by
change Continuous fun m => (List.ofFn m).prod
simp_rw [List.ofFn_eq_map]
exact continuous_list_prod _ fun i _ => continuous_apply _
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A
variable {R n A}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
end Algebra
section SMulRight
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] [TopologicalSpace R] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂]
[ContinuousSMul R M₂] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂)
/-- Given a continuous `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the
continuous multilinear map sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
def smulRight : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := f.toMultilinearMap.smulRight z
cont := f.cont.smul continuous_const
end SMulRight
section CommRing
variable {M : Type*}
variable [Fintype ι] [CommRing R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable [ContinuousMul R] [ContinuousSMul R M]
variable (R ι) in
/-- The canonical continuous multilinear map on `R^ι`, associating to `m` the product of all the
`m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module) -/
protected def mkPiRing (z : M) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply (z : M) (m : ι → R) :
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f :=
toMultilinearMap_injective f.toMultilinearMap.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff {z₁ z₂ : M} :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔
z₁ = z₂ := by
rw [← toMultilinearMap_injective.eq_iff]
exact MultilinearMap.mkPiRing_eq_iff
theorem mkPiRing_zero : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff (z : M) : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommRing
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 687 | 688 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Constant speed
This file defines the notion of constant (and unit) speed for a function `f : ℝ → E` with
pseudo-emetric structure on `E` with respect to a set `s : Set ℝ` and "speed" `l : ℝ≥0`, and shows
that if `f` has locally bounded variation on `s`, it can be obtained (up to distance zero, on `s`),
as a composite `φ ∘ (variationOnFromTo f s a)`, where `φ` has unit speed and `a ∈ s`.
## Main definitions
* `HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `l`.
* `HasUnitSpeedOn f s`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `1`.
* `naturalParameterization f s a : ℝ → E`, the unit speed reparameterization of `f` on `s` relative
to `a`.
## Main statements
* `unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero` proves that if `f` and `f ∘ φ` are both naturally
parameterized on closed intervals starting at `0`, then `φ` must be the identity on
those intervals.
* `edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero` proves that if `f` has locally bounded variation, then
precomposing `naturalParameterization f s a` with `variationOnFromTo f s a` yields a function
at distance zero from `f` on `s`.
* `has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization` proves that if `f` has locally bounded
variation, then `naturalParameterization f s a` has unit speed on `s`.
## Tags
arc-length, parameterization
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
open Set
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
variable (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (l : ℝ≥0)
/-- `f` has constant speed `l` on `s` if the variation of `f` on `s ∩ Icc x y` is equal to
`l * (y - x)` for any `x y` in `s`.
-/
def HasConstantSpeedOnWith :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x))
variable {f s l}
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn (h : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l) :
LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s := fun x y hx hy => by
| simp only [BoundedVariationOn, h hx hy, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_iff]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_of_subsingleton (f : ℝ → E) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
| Mathlib/Analysis/ConstantSpeed.lean | 59 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Closure operators between preorders
We define (bundled) closure operators on a preorder as monotone (increasing), extensive
(inflationary) and idempotent functions.
We define closed elements for the operator as elements which are fixed by it.
Lower adjoints to a function between preorders `u : β → α` allow to generalise closure operators to
situations where the closure operator we are dealing with naturally decomposes as `u ∘ l` where `l`
is a worthy function to have on its own. Typical examples include
`l : Set G → Subgroup G := Subgroup.closure`, `u : Subgroup G → Set G := (↑)`, where `G` is a group.
This shows there is a close connection between closure operators, lower adjoints and Galois
connections/insertions: every Galois connection induces a lower adjoint which itself induces a
closure operator by composition (see `GaloisConnection.lowerAdjoint` and
`LowerAdjoint.closureOperator`), and every closure operator on a partial order induces a Galois
insertion from the set of closed elements to the underlying type (see `ClosureOperator.gi`).
## Main definitions
* `ClosureOperator`: A closure operator is a monotone function `f : α → α` such that
`∀ x, x ≤ f x` and `∀ x, f (f x) = f x`.
* `LowerAdjoint`: A lower adjoint to `u : β → α` is a function `l : α → β` such that `l` and `u`
form a Galois connection.
## Implementation details
Although `LowerAdjoint` is technically a generalisation of `ClosureOperator` (by defining
`toFun := id`), it is desirable to have both as otherwise `id`s would be carried all over the
place when using concrete closure operators such as `ConvexHull`.
`LowerAdjoint` really is a semibundled `structure` version of `GaloisConnection`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closure_operator#Closure_operators_on_partially_ordered_sets
-/
open Set
/-! ### Closure operator -/
variable (α : Type*) {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- A closure operator on the preorder `α` is a monotone function which is extensive (every `x`
is less than its closure) and idempotent. -/
structure ClosureOperator [Preorder α] extends α →o α where
/-- An element is less than or equal its closure -/
le_closure' : ∀ x, x ≤ toFun x
/-- Closures are idempotent -/
idempotent' : ∀ x, toFun (toFun x) = toFun x
/-- Predicate for an element to be closed.
By default, this is defined as `c.IsClosed x := (c x = x)` (see `isClosed_iff`).
We allow an override to fix definitional equalities. -/
IsClosed (x : α) : Prop := toFun x = x
isClosed_iff {x : α} : IsClosed x ↔ toFun x = x := by aesop
namespace ClosureOperator
instance [Preorder α] : FunLike (ClosureOperator α) α α where
coe c := c.1
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h; obtain rfl := DFunLike.ext' h; congr with x; simp_all
instance [Preorder α] : OrderHomClass (ClosureOperator α) α α where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.mono h
initialize_simps_projections ClosureOperator (toFun → apply, IsClosed → isClosed)
/-- If `c` is a closure operator on `α` and `e` an order-isomorphism
between `α` and `β` then `e ∘ c ∘ e⁻¹` is a closure operator on `β`. -/
@[simps apply]
def conjBy {α β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (c : ClosureOperator α)
(e : α ≃o β) : ClosureOperator β where
toFun := e.conj c
IsClosed b := c.IsClosed (e.symm b)
monotone' _ _ h :=
(map_le_map_iff e).mpr <| c.monotone <| (map_le_map_iff e.symm).mpr h
le_closure' _ := e.symm_apply_le.mp (c.le_closure' _)
idempotent' _ :=
congrArg e <| Eq.trans (congrArg c (e.symm_apply_apply _)) (c.idempotent' _)
isClosed_iff := Iff.trans c.isClosed_iff e.eq_symm_apply
lemma conjBy_refl {α} [Preorder α] (c : ClosureOperator α) :
c.conjBy (OrderIso.refl α) = c := rfl
lemma conjBy_trans {α β γ} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
(e₁ : α ≃o β) (e₂ : β ≃o γ) (c : ClosureOperator α) :
c.conjBy (e₁.trans e₂) = (c.conjBy e₁).conjBy e₂ := rfl
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
/-- The identity function as a closure operator. -/
@[simps!]
def id : ClosureOperator α where
toOrderHom := OrderHom.id
le_closure' _ := le_rfl
idempotent' _ := rfl
IsClosed _ := True
instance : Inhabited (ClosureOperator α) :=
⟨id α⟩
variable {α}
variable (c : ClosureOperator α)
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ c₁ c₂ : ClosureOperator α, (∀ x, c₁ x = c₂ x) → c₁ = c₂ :=
DFunLike.ext
/-- Constructor for a closure operator using the weaker idempotency axiom: `f (f x) ≤ f x`. -/
@[simps]
def mk' (f : α → α) (hf₁ : Monotone f) (hf₂ : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hf₃ : ∀ x, f (f x) ≤ f x) :
ClosureOperator α where
toFun := f
monotone' := hf₁
le_closure' := hf₂
idempotent' x := (hf₃ x).antisymm (hf₁ (hf₂ x))
/-- Convenience constructor for a closure operator using the weaker minimality axiom:
`x ≤ f y → f x ≤ f y`, which is sometimes easier to prove in practice. -/
@[simps]
def mk₂ (f : α → α) (hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ f y → f x ≤ f y) :
ClosureOperator α where
toFun := f
monotone' _ y hxy := hmin (hxy.trans (hf y))
le_closure' := hf
idempotent' _ := (hmin le_rfl).antisymm (hf _)
/-- Construct a closure operator from an inflationary function `f` and a "closedness" predicate `p`
witnessing minimality of `f x` among closed elements greater than `x`. -/
@[simps!]
def ofPred (f : α → α) (p : α → Prop) (hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hfp : ∀ x, p (f x))
(hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → p y → f x ≤ y) : ClosureOperator α where
__ := mk₂ f hf fun _ y hxy => hmin hxy (hfp y)
IsClosed := p
isClosed_iff := ⟨fun hx ↦ (hmin le_rfl hx).antisymm <| hf _, fun hx ↦ hx ▸ hfp _⟩
@[mono]
theorem monotone : Monotone c :=
c.monotone'
/-- Every element is less than its closure. This property is sometimes referred to as extensivity or
inflationarity. -/
theorem le_closure (x : α) : x ≤ c x :=
c.le_closure' x
@[simp]
theorem idempotent (x : α) : c (c x) = c x :=
c.idempotent' x
@[simp] lemma isClosed_closure (x : α) : c.IsClosed (c x) := c.isClosed_iff.2 <| c.idempotent x
/-- The type of elements closed under a closure operator. -/
abbrev Closeds := {x // c.IsClosed x}
/-- Send an element to a closed element (by taking the closure). -/
def toCloseds (x : α) : c.Closeds := ⟨c x, c.isClosed_closure x⟩
variable {c} {x y : α}
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq : c.IsClosed x → c x = x := c.isClosed_iff.1
theorem isClosed_iff_closure_le : c.IsClosed x ↔ c x ≤ x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.closure_eq.le, fun h ↦ c.isClosed_iff.2 <| h.antisymm <| c.le_closure x⟩
/-- The set of closed elements for `c` is exactly its range. -/
theorem setOf_isClosed_eq_range_closure : {x | c.IsClosed x} = Set.range c := by
ext x; exact ⟨fun hx ↦ ⟨x, hx.closure_eq⟩, by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact c.isClosed_closure _⟩
theorem le_closure_iff : x ≤ c y ↔ c x ≤ c y :=
⟨fun h ↦ c.idempotent y ▸ c.monotone h, (c.le_closure x).trans⟩
@[simp]
theorem IsClosed.closure_le_iff (hy : c.IsClosed y) : c x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← hy.closure_eq, ← le_closure_iff]
lemma closure_min (hxy : x ≤ y) (hy : c.IsClosed y) : c x ≤ y := hy.closure_le_iff.2 hxy
lemma closure_isGLB (x : α) : IsGLB { y | x ≤ y ∧ c.IsClosed y } (c x) where
left _ := and_imp.mpr closure_min
right _ h := h ⟨c.le_closure x, c.isClosed_closure x⟩
theorem ext_isClosed (c₁ c₂ : ClosureOperator α)
(h : ∀ x, c₁.IsClosed x ↔ c₂.IsClosed x) : c₁ = c₂ :=
ext c₁ c₂ <| fun x => IsGLB.unique (c₁.closure_isGLB x) <|
(Set.ext (and_congr_right' <| h ·)).substr (c₂.closure_isGLB x)
/-- A closure operator is equal to the closure operator obtained by feeding `c.closed` into the
`ofPred` constructor. -/
theorem eq_ofPred_closed (c : ClosureOperator α) :
c = ofPred c c.IsClosed c.le_closure c.isClosed_closure fun _ _ ↦ closure_min := by
ext
rfl
end PartialOrder
variable {α}
section OrderTop
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] (c : ClosureOperator α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_top : c ⊤ = ⊤ :=
le_top.antisymm (c.le_closure _)
@[simp] lemma isClosed_top : c.IsClosed ⊤ := c.isClosed_iff.2 c.closure_top
end OrderTop
theorem closure_inf_le [SemilatticeInf α] (c : ClosureOperator α) (x y : α) :
c (x ⊓ y) ≤ c x ⊓ c y :=
c.monotone.map_inf_le _ _
section SemilatticeSup
| variable [SemilatticeSup α] (c : ClosureOperator α)
theorem closure_sup_closure_le (x y : α) : c x ⊔ c y ≤ c (x ⊔ y) :=
c.monotone.le_map_sup _ _
| Mathlib/Order/Closure.lean | 230 | 233 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,025 | 1,028 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Tuple
/-!
# Collections of tuples of naturals with the same sum
This file generalizes `List.Nat.Antidiagonal n`, `Multiset.Nat.Antidiagonal n`, and
`Finset.Nat.Antidiagonal n` from the pair of elements `x : ℕ × ℕ` such that `n = x.1 + x.2`, to
the sequence of elements `x : Fin k → ℕ` such that `n = ∑ i, x i`.
## Main definitions
* `List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`
* `Multiset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`
* `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple`
## Main results
* `antidiagonalTuple 2 n` is analogous to `antidiagonal n`:
* `List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_two`
* `Multiset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_two`
* `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_two`
## Implementation notes
While we could implement this by filtering `(Fintype.PiFinset fun _ ↦ range (n + 1))` or similar,
this implementation would be much slower.
In the future, we could consider generalizing `Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple` further to
support finitely-supported functions, as is done with `cut` in
`archive/100-theorems-list/45_partition.lean`.
-/
/-! ### Lists -/
namespace List.Nat
/-- `List.antidiagonalTuple k n` is a list of all `k`-tuples which sum to `n`.
This list contains no duplicates (`List.Nat.nodup_antidiagonalTuple`), and is sorted
lexicographically (`List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_pairwise_pi_lex`), starting with `![0, ..., n]`
and ending with `![n, ..., 0]`.
```
#eval antidiagonalTuple 3 2
-- [![0, 0, 2], ![0, 1, 1], ![0, 2, 0], ![1, 0, 1], ![1, 1, 0], ![2, 0, 0]]
```
-/
def antidiagonalTuple : ∀ k, ℕ → List (Fin k → ℕ)
| 0, 0 => [![]]
| 0, _ + 1 => []
| k + 1, n =>
(List.Nat.antidiagonal n).flatMap fun ni =>
(antidiagonalTuple k ni.2).map fun x => Fin.cons ni.1 x
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_zero : antidiagonalTuple 0 0 = [![]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : antidiagonalTuple 0 (n + 1) = [] :=
rfl
theorem mem_antidiagonalTuple {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} {x : Fin k → ℕ} :
x ∈ antidiagonalTuple k n ↔ ∑ i, x i = n := by
induction x using Fin.consInduction generalizing n with
| h0 =>
cases n
| · decide
· simp [eq_comm]
| h x₀ x ih =>
simp_rw [Fin.sum_cons, antidiagonalTuple, List.mem_flatMap, List.mem_map,
List.Nat.mem_antidiagonal, Fin.cons_inj, exists_eq_right_right, ih,
@eq_comm _ _ (Prod.snd _), and_comm (a := Prod.snd _ = _),
← Prod.mk_inj (a₁ := Prod.fst _), exists_eq_right]
/-- The antidiagonal of `n` does not contain duplicate entries. -/
theorem nodup_antidiagonalTuple (k n : ℕ) : List.Nodup (antidiagonalTuple k n) := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing n
· cases n
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 79 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Contracting maps
A Lipschitz continuous self-map with Lipschitz constant `K < 1` is called a *contracting map*.
In this file we prove the Banach fixed point theorem, some explicit estimates on the rate
of convergence, and some properties of the map sending a contracting map to its fixed point.
## Main definitions
* `ContractingWith K f` : a Lipschitz continuous self-map with `K < 1`;
* `efixedPoint` : given a contracting map `f` on a complete emetric space and a point `x`
such that `edist x (f x) ≠ ∞`, `efixedPoint f hf x hx` is the unique fixed point of `f`
in `EMetric.ball x ∞`;
* `fixedPoint` : the unique fixed point of a contracting map on a complete nonempty metric space.
## Tags
contracting map, fixed point, Banach fixed point theorem
-/
open NNReal Topology ENNReal Filter Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A map is said to be `ContractingWith K`, if `K < 1` and `f` is `LipschitzWith K`. -/
def ContractingWith [EMetricSpace α] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → α) :=
K < 1 ∧ LipschitzWith K f
namespace ContractingWith
variable [EMetricSpace α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → α}
open EMetric Set
theorem toLipschitzWith (hf : ContractingWith K f) : LipschitzWith K f := hf.2
theorem one_sub_K_pos' (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 - K := by simp [hf.1]
theorem one_sub_K_ne_zero (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt hf.one_sub_K_pos'
theorem one_sub_K_ne_top : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ ∞ := by
norm_cast
exact ENNReal.coe_ne_top
theorem edist_inequality (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (h : edist x y ≠ ∞) :
edist x y ≤ (edist x (f x) + edist y (f y)) / (1 - K) :=
suffices edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + K * edist x y by
rwa [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hf.one_sub_K_ne_zero) (Or.inl one_sub_K_ne_top),
mul_comm, ENNReal.sub_mul fun _ _ ↦ h, one_mul, tsub_le_iff_right]
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) + edist (f x) (f y) + edist (f y) y := edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
_ = edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + edist (f x) (f y) := by rw [edist_comm y, add_right_comm]
_ ≤ edist x (f x) + edist y (f y) + K * edist x y := add_le_add le_rfl (hf.2 _ _)
theorem edist_le_of_fixedPoint (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (h : edist x y ≠ ∞)
(hy : IsFixedPt f y) : edist x y ≤ edist x (f x) / (1 - K) := by
| simpa only [hy.eq, edist_self, add_zero] using hf.edist_inequality h
theorem eq_or_edist_eq_top_of_fixedPoints (hf : ContractingWith K f) {x y} (hx : IsFixedPt f x)
(hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y ∨ edist x y = ∞ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun h ↦ edist_le_zero.1 ?_
simpa only [hx.eq, edist_self, add_zero, ENNReal.zero_div] using hf.edist_le_of_fixedPoint h hy
/-- If a map `f` is `ContractingWith K`, and `s` is a forward-invariant set, then
restriction of `f` to `s` is `ContractingWith K` as well. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Contracting.lean | 68 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym] at h
exact legendreSym.prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the first argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_left {l : List ℤ} {n : ℕ} : J(l.prod | n) = (l.map fun a => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, List.map_nil, one_left]
| cons n l' ih => rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_left, ih]
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the second argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_right {a : ℤ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ n ∈ l, n ≠ 0) :
J(a | l.prod) = (l.map fun n => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, one_right, List.map_nil]
| cons n l' ih =>
have hn := hl n List.mem_cons_self
-- `n ≠ 0`
have hl' := List.prod_ne_zero fun hf => hl 0 (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hf) rfl
-- `l'.prod ≠ 0`
have h := fun m hm => hl m (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hm)
-- `∀ (m : ℕ), m ∈ l' → m ≠ 0`
rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_right' a hn hl', ih h]
/-- If `J(a | n) = -1`, then `n` has a prime divisor `p` such that `J(a | p) = -1`. -/
theorem eq_neg_one_at_prime_divisor_of_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (h : J(a | n) = -1) :
∃ p : ℕ, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ J(a | p) = -1 := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_right, CharZero.eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
have hf₀ (p) (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList) : p ≠ 0 := (Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp).ne.symm
rw [← Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hn₀, list_prod_right hf₀] at h
obtain ⟨p, hmem, hj⟩ := List.mem_map.mp (List.neg_one_mem_of_prod_eq_neg_one h)
exact ⟨p, Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, hj⟩
end jacobiSym
namespace ZMod
open jacobiSym
/-- If `J(a | b)` is `-1`, then `a` is not a square modulo `b`. -/
theorem nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : J(a | b) = -1) :
¬IsSquare (a : ZMod b) := fun ⟨r, ha⟩ => by
rw [← r.coe_valMinAbs, ← Int.cast_mul, intCast_eq_intCast_iff', ← sq] at ha
apply (by norm_num : ¬(0 : ℤ) ≤ -1)
rw [← h, mod_left, ha, ← mod_left, pow_left]
apply sq_nonneg
/-- If `p` is prime, then `J(a | p)` is `-1` iff `a` is not a square modulo `p`. -/
theorem nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] :
J(a | p) = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym]
exact legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff p
/-- If `p` is prime and `J(a | p) = 1`, then `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
theorem isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (h : J(a | p) = 1) :
IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
Classical.not_not.mp <| by rw [← nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one, h]; decide
end ZMod
/-!
### Values at `-1`, `2` and `-2`
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- If `χ` is a multiplicative function such that `J(a | p) = χ p` for all odd primes `p`,
then `J(a | b)` equals `χ b` for all odd natural numbers `b`. -/
theorem value_at (a : ℤ) {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (χ : R →* ℤ)
(hp : ∀ (p : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime), p ≠ 2 → @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a = χ p) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = χ b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← prod_primeFactorsList hb.pos.ne', cast_list_prod, map_list_prod χ]
rw [jacobiSym, List.map_map, ← List.pmap_eq_map
fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList]
congr 1; apply List.pmap_congr_left
exact fun p h pp _ => hp p pp (hb.ne_two_of_dvd_nat <| dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)
/-- If `b` is odd, then `J(-1 | b)` is given by `χ₄ b`. -/
theorem at_neg_one {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(-1 | b) = χ₄ b :=
-- Porting note: In mathlib3, it was written `χ₄` and Lean could guess that it had to use
-- `χ₄.to_monoid_hom`. This is not the case with Lean 4.
value_at (-1) χ₄.toMonoidHom (fun p pp => @legendreSym.at_neg_one p ⟨pp⟩) hb
/-- If `b` is odd, then `J(-a | b) = χ₄ b * J(a | b)`. -/
protected theorem neg (a : ℤ) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(-a | b) = χ₄ b * J(a | b) := by
rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_left, at_neg_one hb]
/-- If `b` is odd, then `J(2 | b)` is given by `χ₈ b`. -/
theorem at_two {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(2 | b) = χ₈ b :=
value_at 2 χ₈.toMonoidHom (fun p pp => @legendreSym.at_two p ⟨pp⟩) hb
/-- If `b` is odd, then `J(-2 | b)` is given by `χ₈' b`. -/
theorem at_neg_two {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(-2 | b) = χ₈' b :=
value_at (-2) χ₈'.toMonoidHom (fun p pp => @legendreSym.at_neg_two p ⟨pp⟩) hb
theorem div_four_left {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (ha4 : a % 4 = 0) (hb2 : b % 2 = 1) :
J(a / 4 | b) = J(a | b) := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero ha4
have : Int.gcd (2 : ℕ) b = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd_natCast_natCast, ← b.mod_add_div 2, hb2, Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right,
Nat.gcd_one_right]
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ (by decide), jacobiSym.mul_left,
(by decide : (4 : ℤ) = (2 : ℕ) ^ 2), jacobiSym.sq_one' this, one_mul]
theorem even_odd {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (ha2 : a % 2 = 0) (hb2 : b % 2 = 1) :
(if b % 8 = 3 ∨ b % 8 = 5 then -J(a / 2 | b) else J(a / 2 | b)) = J(a | b) := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero ha2
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ (by decide), jacobiSym.mul_left,
jacobiSym.at_two (Nat.odd_iff.mpr hb2), ZMod.χ₈_nat_eq_if_mod_eight,
if_neg (Nat.mod_two_ne_zero.mpr hb2)]
have := Nat.mod_lt b (by decide : 0 < 8)
interval_cases h : b % 8 <;> simp_all <;>
· have := hb2 ▸ h ▸ Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd b (by decide : 2 ∣ 8)
simp_all
end jacobiSym
/-!
### Quadratic Reciprocity
-/
/-- The bi-multiplicative map giving the sign in the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity -/
def qrSign (m n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
J(χ₄ m | n)
namespace qrSign
/-- We can express `qrSign m n` as a power of `-1` when `m` and `n` are odd. -/
theorem neg_one_pow {m n : ℕ} (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) :
qrSign m n = (-1) ^ (m / 2 * (n / 2)) := by
rw [qrSign, pow_mul, ← χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow (odd_iff.mp hm)]
rcases odd_mod_four_iff.mp (odd_iff.mp hm) with h | h
· rw [χ₄_nat_one_mod_four h, jacobiSym.one_left, one_pow]
· rw [χ₄_nat_three_mod_four h, ← χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow (odd_iff.mp hn), jacobiSym.at_neg_one hn]
/-- When `m` and `n` are odd, then the square of `qrSign m n` is `1`. -/
theorem sq_eq_one {m n : ℕ} (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) : qrSign m n ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [neg_one_pow hm hn, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, neg_one_sq, one_pow]
/-- `qrSign` is multiplicative in the first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (m₁ m₂ n : ℕ) : qrSign (m₁ * m₂) n = qrSign m₁ n * qrSign m₂ n := by
simp_rw [qrSign, Nat.cast_mul, map_mul, jacobiSym.mul_left]
/-- `qrSign` is multiplicative in the second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (m n₁ n₂ : ℕ) [NeZero n₁] [NeZero n₂] :
qrSign m (n₁ * n₂) = qrSign m n₁ * qrSign m n₂ :=
jacobiSym.mul_right (χ₄ m) n₁ n₂
/-- `qrSign` is symmetric when both arguments are odd. -/
protected theorem symm {m n : ℕ} (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) : qrSign m n = qrSign n m := by
rw [neg_one_pow hm hn, neg_one_pow hn hm, mul_comm (m / 2)]
/-- We can move `qrSign m n` from one side of an equality to the other when `m` and `n` are odd. -/
theorem eq_iff_eq {m n : ℕ} (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) (x y : ℤ) :
qrSign m n * x = y ↔ x = qrSign m n * y := by
refine
⟨fun h' =>
let h := h'.symm
?_,
fun h => ?_⟩ <;>
rw [h, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_two, sq_eq_one hm hn, one_mul]
end qrSign
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The **Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol**, version with `qrSign` -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity' {a b : ℕ} (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = qrSign b a * J(b | a) := by
-- define the right hand side for fixed `a` as a `ℕ →* ℤ`
let rhs : ℕ → ℕ →* ℤ := fun a =>
{ toFun := fun x => qrSign x a * J(x | a)
map_one' := by convert ← mul_one (M := ℤ) _; (on_goal 1 => symm); all_goals apply one_left
map_mul' := fun x y => by
simp_rw [qrSign.mul_left x y a, Nat.cast_mul, mul_left, mul_mul_mul_comm] }
have rhs_apply : ∀ a b : ℕ, rhs a b = qrSign b a * J(b | a) := fun a b => rfl
refine value_at a (rhs a) (fun p pp hp => Eq.symm ?_) hb
have hpo := pp.eq_two_or_odd'.resolve_left hp
rw [@legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p ⟨pp⟩, rhs_apply, Nat.cast_id, qrSign.eq_iff_eq hpo ha,
qrSign.symm hpo ha]
refine value_at p (rhs p) (fun q pq hq => ?_) ha
have hqo := pq.eq_two_or_odd'.resolve_left hq
rw [rhs_apply, Nat.cast_id, ← @legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p ⟨pp⟩, qrSign.symm hqo hpo,
qrSign.neg_one_pow hpo hqo, @legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity' p q ⟨pp⟩ ⟨pq⟩ hp hq]
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity {a b : ℕ} (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = (-1) ^ (a / 2 * (b / 2)) * J(b | a) := by
rw [← qrSign.neg_one_pow ha hb, qrSign.symm ha hb, quadratic_reciprocity' ha hb]
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol: if `a` and `b` are natural numbers
with `a % 4 = 1` and `b` odd, then `J(a | b) = J(b | a)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four {a b : ℕ} (ha : a % 4 = 1) (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = J(b | a) := by
rw [quadratic_reciprocity (odd_iff.mpr (odd_of_mod_four_eq_one ha)) hb, pow_mul,
neg_one_pow_div_two_of_one_mod_four ha, one_pow, one_mul]
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol: if `a` and `b` are natural numbers
with `a` odd and `b % 4 = 1`, then `J(a | b) = J(b | a)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four' {a b : ℕ} (ha : Odd a) (hb : b % 4 = 1) :
J(a | b) = J(b | a) :=
(quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four hb ha).symm
/-- The Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol: if `a` and `b` are natural numbers
both congruent to `3` mod `4`, then `J(a | b) = -J(b | a)`. -/
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four {a b : ℕ} (ha : a % 4 = 3) (hb : b % 4 = 3) :
J(a | b) = -J(b | a) := by
let nop := @neg_one_pow_div_two_of_three_mod_four
rw [quadratic_reciprocity, pow_mul, nop ha, nop hb, neg_one_mul] <;>
rwa [odd_iff, odd_of_mod_four_eq_three]
theorem quadratic_reciprocity_if {a b : ℕ} (ha2 : a % 2 = 1) (hb2 : b % 2 = 1) :
(if a % 4 = 3 ∧ b % 4 = 3 then -J(b | a) else J(b | a)) = J(a | b) := by
rcases Nat.odd_mod_four_iff.mp ha2 with ha1 | ha3
· simpa [ha1] using jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four' (Nat.odd_iff.mpr hb2) ha1
rcases Nat.odd_mod_four_iff.mp hb2 with hb1 | hb3
· simpa [hb1] using jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four hb1 (Nat.odd_iff.mpr ha2)
simpa [ha3, hb3] using (jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four ha3 hb3).symm
/-- The Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `b` mod `4*a` (version for `a : ℕ`). -/
theorem mod_right' (a : ℕ) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(a | b) = J(a | b % (4 * a)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha₀)
· rw [mul_zero, mod_zero]
have hb' : Odd (b % (4 * a)) := hb.mod_even (Even.mul_right (by decide) _)
rcases exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd ha₀ 2 (by norm_num) with ⟨e, a', ha₁', ha₂⟩
have ha₁ := odd_iff.mpr (two_dvd_ne_zero.mp ha₁')
nth_rw 2 [ha₂]; nth_rw 1 [ha₂]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, mul_left, mul_left, quadratic_reciprocity' ha₁ hb,
quadratic_reciprocity' ha₁ hb', Nat.cast_pow, pow_left, pow_left, Nat.cast_two, at_two hb,
at_two hb']
congr 1; swap
· congr 1
· simp_rw [qrSign]
rw [χ₄_nat_mod_four, χ₄_nat_mod_four (b % (4 * a)), mod_mod_of_dvd b (dvd_mul_right 4 a)]
· rw [mod_left ↑(b % _), mod_left b, Int.natCast_mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd b]
simp only [ha₂, Nat.cast_mul, ← mul_assoc]
apply dvd_mul_left
rcases e with - | e; · rfl
· rw [χ₈_nat_mod_eight, χ₈_nat_mod_eight (b % (4 * a)), mod_mod_of_dvd b]
use 2 ^ e * a'; rw [ha₂, Nat.pow_succ]; ring
/-- The Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `b` mod `4*a`. -/
theorem mod_right (a : ℤ) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(a | b) = J(a | b % (4 * a.natAbs)) := by
rcases Int.natAbs_eq a with ha | ha <;> nth_rw 2 [ha] <;> nth_rw 1 [ha]
· exact mod_right' a.natAbs hb
· have hb' : Odd (b % (4 * a.natAbs)) := hb.mod_even (Even.mul_right (by decide) _)
rw [jacobiSym.neg _ hb, jacobiSym.neg _ hb', mod_right' _ hb, χ₄_nat_mod_four,
χ₄_nat_mod_four (b % (4 * _)), mod_mod_of_dvd b (dvd_mul_right 4 _)]
end jacobiSym
end Jacobi
section FastJacobi
/-!
### Fast computation of the Jacobi symbol
We follow the implementation as in `Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.LegendreSymbol`.
-/
open NumberTheorySymbols jacobiSym
/-- Computes `J(a | b)` (or `-J(a | b)` if `flip` is set to `true`) given assumptions, by reducing
`a` to odd by repeated division and then using quadratic reciprocity to swap `a`, `b`. -/
private def fastJacobiSymAux (a b : ℕ) (flip : Bool) (ha0 : a > 0) : ℤ :=
if ha4 : a % 4 = 0 then
fastJacobiSymAux (a / 4) b flip
(Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd ha0 (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha4)) (by decide))
else if ha2 : a % 2 = 0 then
fastJacobiSymAux (a / 2) b (xor (b % 8 = 3 ∨ b % 8 = 5) flip)
(Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd ha0 (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha2)) (by decide))
else if ha1 : a = 1 then
if flip then -1 else 1
else if hba : b % a = 0 then
0
else
fastJacobiSymAux (b % a) a (xor (a % 4 = 3 ∧ b % 4 = 3) flip) (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hba)
termination_by a
decreasing_by
· exact a.div_lt_self ha0 (by decide)
· exact a.div_lt_self ha0 (by decide)
· exact b.mod_lt ha0
private theorem fastJacobiSymAux.eq_jacobiSym {a b : ℕ} {flip : Bool} {ha0 : a > 0}
(hb2 : b % 2 = 1) (hb1 : b > 1) :
fastJacobiSymAux a b flip ha0 = if flip then -J(a | b) else J(a | b) := by
induction a using Nat.strongRecOn generalizing b flip with | ind a IH =>
unfold fastJacobiSymAux
split <;> rename_i ha4
· rw [IH (a / 4) (a.div_lt_self ha0 (by decide)) hb2 hb1]
simp only [Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat, div_four_left (a := a) (mod_cast ha4) hb2]
split <;> rename_i ha2
· rw [IH (a / 2) (a.div_lt_self ha0 (by decide)) hb2 hb1]
simp only [Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat, ← even_odd (a := a) (mod_cast ha2) hb2]
by_cases h : b % 8 = 3 ∨ b % 8 = 5 <;> simp [h]; cases flip <;> simp
split <;> rename_i ha1
· subst ha1; simp
split <;> rename_i hba
· suffices J(a | b) = 0 by simp [this]
refine eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨fun h ↦ absurd (h ▸ hb1) (by decide), ?_⟩
rwa [Int.gcd_natCast_natCast, Nat.gcd_eq_left (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hba)]
rw [IH (b % a) (b.mod_lt ha0) (Nat.mod_two_ne_zero.mp ha2) (lt_of_le_of_ne ha0 (Ne.symm ha1))]
simp only [Int.natCast_mod, ← mod_left]
rw [← quadratic_reciprocity_if (Nat.mod_two_ne_zero.mp ha2) hb2]
by_cases h : a % 4 = 3 ∧ b % 4 = 3 <;> simp [h]; cases flip <;> simp
/-- Computes `J(a | b)` by reducing `b` to odd by repeated division and then using
`fastJacobiSymAux`. -/
private def fastJacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
if hb0 : b = 0 then
1
else if _ : b % 2 = 0 then
if a % 2 = 0 then
0
else
have : b / 2 < b := b.div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb0) one_lt_two
fastJacobiSym a (b / 2)
else if b = 1 then
1
else if hab : a % b = 0 then
0
else
fastJacobiSymAux (a % b).natAbs b false (Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hab)
@[csimp] private theorem fastJacobiSym.eq : jacobiSym = fastJacobiSym := by
ext a b
induction b using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind b IH =>
unfold fastJacobiSym
split_ifs with hb0 hb2 ha2 hb1 hab
· rw [hb0, zero_right]
· refine eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨hb0, ne_of_gt ?_⟩
refine Nat.le_of_dvd (Int.gcd_pos_iff.mpr (mod_cast .inr hb0)) ?_
refine Nat.dvd_gcd (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.mp (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero ha2)) ?_
exact Int.ofNat_dvd_left.mp (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero (mod_cast hb2))
· dsimp only
rw [← IH (b / 2) (b.div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb0) one_lt_two)]
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb2
rw [mul_right' a (by decide) fun h ↦ hb0 (mul_eq_zero_of_right 2 h),
b.mul_div_cancel_left (by decide), mod_left a 2, Nat.cast_ofNat,
Int.emod_two_ne_zero.mp ha2, one_left, one_mul]
· rw [hb1, one_right]
· rw [mod_left, hab, zero_left (lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb0) (Ne.symm hb1))]
· rw [fastJacobiSymAux.eq_jacobiSym, if_neg Bool.false_ne_true, mod_left a b,
Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (a.emod_nonneg (mod_cast hb0))]
· exact Nat.mod_two_ne_zero.mp hb2
· exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hb0) (Ne.symm hb1)
/-- Computes `legendreSym p a` using `fastJacobiSym`. -/
@[inline, nolint unusedArguments]
private def fastLegendreSym (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) : ℤ := J(a | p)
@[csimp] private theorem fastLegendreSym.eq : legendreSym = fastLegendreSym := by
ext p _ a; rw [legendreSym.to_jacobiSym, fastLegendreSym]
end FastJacobi
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 639 | 640 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
| theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 580 | 581 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
| ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 556 | 560 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Topology on the set of filters on a type
This file introduces a topology on `Filter α`. It is generated by the sets
`Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`, `s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and
only if it is a union of a family of these basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`.
This topology has the following important properties.
* If `X` is a topological space, then the map `𝓝 : X → Filter X` is a topology inducing map.
* In particular, it is a continuous map, so `𝓝 ∘ f` tends to `𝓝 (𝓝 a)` whenever `f` tends to `𝓝 a`.
* If `X` is an ordered topological space with order topology and no max element, then `𝓝 ∘ f` tends
to `𝓝 Filter.atTop` whenever `f` tends to `Filter.atTop`.
* It turns `Filter X` into a T₀ space and the order on `Filter X` is the dual of the
`specializationOrder (Filter X)`.
## Tags
filter, topological space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open Filter Topology
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β X Y : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-- The topology on `Filter α` is generated by the sets `Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`,
`s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and only if it is a union of a family of these
basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace (Filter α) :=
generateFrom <| range <| Iic ∘ 𝓟
theorem isOpen_Iic_principal {s : Set α} : IsOpen (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
GenerateOpen.basic _ (mem_range_self _)
theorem isOpen_setOf_mem {s : Set α} : IsOpen { l : Filter α | s ∈ l } := by
simpa only [Iic_principal] using isOpen_Iic_principal
theorem isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal :
IsTopologicalBasis (range (Iic ∘ 𝓟 : Set α → Set (Filter α))) :=
{ exists_subset_inter := by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩ l hl
exact ⟨Iic (𝓟 s) ∩ Iic (𝓟 t), ⟨s ∩ t, by simp⟩, hl, Subset.rfl⟩
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun _ => ⟨Iic ⊤, ⟨univ, congr_arg Iic principal_univ⟩,
mem_Iic.2 le_top⟩
eq_generateFrom := rfl }
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (Filter α)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∃ T : Set (Set α), s = ⋃ t ∈ T, Iic (𝓟 t) :=
isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal.open_iff_eq_sUnion.trans <| by
simp only [exists_subset_range_and_iff, sUnion_image, (· ∘ ·)]
theorem nhds_eq (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' (Iic ∘ 𝓟) :=
nhds_generateFrom.trans <| by
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (l ∈ _), iInf_and, iInf_range, Filter.lift', Filter.lift,
(· ∘ ·), mem_Iic, le_principal_iff]
theorem nhds_eq' (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' fun s => { l' | s ∈ l' } := by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, Iic_principal] using nhds_eq l
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {f : α → Filter β} :
Tendsto f la (𝓝 lb) ↔ ∀ s ∈ lb, ∀ᶠ a in la, s ∈ f a := by
simp only [nhds_eq', tendsto_lift', mem_setOf_eq]
protected theorem HasBasis.nhds {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => Iic (𝓟 (s i)) := by
rw [nhds_eq]
exact h.lift' monotone_principal.Iic
protected theorem tendsto_pure_self (l : Filter X) :
Tendsto (pure : X → Filter X) l (𝓝 l) := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_nhds]
exact fun s hs ↦ Eventually.mono hs fun x ↦ id
/-- Neighborhoods of a countably generated filter is a countably generated filter. -/
instance {l : Filter α} [IsCountablyGenerated l] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 l) :=
let ⟨_b, hb⟩ := l.exists_antitone_basis
HasCountableBasis.isCountablyGenerated <| ⟨hb.nhds, Set.to_countable _⟩
theorem HasBasis.nhds' {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => { l' | s i ∈ l' } := by simpa only [Iic_principal] using h.nhds
protected theorem mem_nhds_iff {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, Iic (𝓟 t) ⊆ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds.mem_iff
theorem mem_nhds_iff' {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, ∀ ⦃l' : Filter α⦄, t ∈ l' → l' ∈ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds'.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bot : 𝓝 (⊥ : Filter α) = pure ⊥ := by
simp [nhds_eq, Function.comp_def, lift'_bot monotone_principal.Iic]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ := by simp [nhds_eq]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_principal (s : Set α) : 𝓝 (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
(hasBasis_principal s).nhds.eq_of_same_basis (hasBasis_principal _)
@[simp]
theorem nhds_pure (x : α) : 𝓝 (pure x : Filter α) = 𝓟 {⊥, pure x} := by
rw [← principal_singleton, nhds_principal, principal_singleton, Iic_pure]
@[simp]
protected theorem nhds_iInf (f : ι → Filter α) : 𝓝 (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, 𝓝 (f i) := by
simp only [nhds_eq]
apply lift'_iInf_of_map_univ <;> simp
| Mathlib/Topology/Filter.lean | 125 | 125 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.StructuredArrow.Small
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Generator.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.WeaklyInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Comma
/-!
# Adjoint functor theorem
This file proves the (general) adjoint functor theorem, in the form:
* If `G : D ⥤ C` preserves limits and `D` has limits, and satisfies the solution set condition,
then it has a left adjoint: `isRightAdjointOfPreservesLimitsOfIsCoseparating`.
We show that the converse holds, i.e. that if `G` has a left adjoint then it satisfies the solution
set condition, see `solutionSetCondition_of_isRightAdjoint`
(the file `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits` already shows it preserves limits).
We define the *solution set condition* for the functor `G : D ⥤ C` to mean, for every object
`A : C`, there is a set-indexed family ${f_i : A ⟶ G (B_i)}$ such that any morphism `A ⟶ G X`
factors through one of the `f_i`.
This file also proves the special adjoint functor theorem, in the form:
* If `G : D ⥤ C` preserves limits and `D` is complete, well-powered and has a small coseparating
set, then `G` has a left adjoint: `isRightAdjointOfPreservesLimitsOfIsCoseparating`
Finally, we prove the following corollaries of the special adjoint functor theorem:
* If `C` is complete, well-powered and has a small coseparating set, then it is cocomplete:
`hasColimits_of_hasLimits_of_isCoseparating`, `hasColimits_of_hasLimits_of_hasCoseparator`
* If `C` is cocomplete, co-well-powered and has a small separating set, then it is complete:
`hasLimits_of_hasColimits_of_isSeparating`, `hasLimits_of_hasColimits_of_hasSeparator`
-/
universe v u u'
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {J : Type v}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- The functor `G : D ⥤ C` satisfies the *solution set condition* if for every `A : C`, there is a
family of morphisms `{f_i : A ⟶ G (B_i) // i ∈ ι}` such that given any morphism `h : A ⟶ G X`,
there is some `i ∈ ι` such that `h` factors through `f_i`.
The key part of this definition is that the indexing set `ι` lives in `Type v`, where `v` is the
universe of morphisms of the category: this is the "smallness" condition which allows the general
adjoint functor theorem to go through.
-/
def SolutionSetCondition {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D] (G : D ⥤ C) : Prop :=
∀ A : C,
∃ (ι : Type v) (B : ι → D) (f : ∀ i : ι, A ⟶ G.obj (B i)),
∀ (X) (h : A ⟶ G.obj X), ∃ (i : ι) (g : B i ⟶ X), f i ≫ G.map g = h
section GeneralAdjointFunctorTheorem
variable {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D]
variable (G : D ⥤ C)
/-- If `G : D ⥤ C` is a right adjoint it satisfies the solution set condition. -/
| theorem solutionSetCondition_of_isRightAdjoint [G.IsRightAdjoint] : SolutionSetCondition G := by
intro A
refine
⟨PUnit, fun _ => G.leftAdjoint.obj A, fun _ => (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint G).unit.app A, ?_⟩
intro B h
refine ⟨PUnit.unit, ((Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint G).homEquiv _ _).symm h, ?_⟩
rw [← Adjunction.homEquiv_unit, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/AdjointFunctorTheorems.lean | 69 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
| Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 669 | 673 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjointAux_inner_right, adjointAux_inner_left]
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_norm (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖adjointAux A‖ = ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
· nth_rw 1 [← adjointAux_adjointAux A]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
/-- The adjoint of a bounded operator `A` from a Hilbert space `E` to another Hilbert space `F`,
denoted as `A†`. -/
def adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective { adjointAux with norm_map' := adjointAux_norm } fun A =>
⟨adjointAux A, adjointAux_adjointAux A⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InnerProduct] postfix:1000 "†" => ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint
open InnerProduct
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪(A†) y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_left A x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, (A†) y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_right A x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : A†† = A :=
adjointAux_adjointAux A
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →L[𝕜] G) (B : E →L[𝕜] F) : (A ∘L B)† = B† ∘L A† := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_left]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_right]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (B : F →L[𝕜] E) : A = B† ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_id :
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E) = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E := by
refine Eq.symm ?_
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
simp
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_subtypeL (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
U.subtypeL† = U.orthogonalProjection := by
symm
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
intro x u
rw [U.coe_inner, U.inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right,
U.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self]
rfl
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_orthogonalProjection (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
(U.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] U)† = U.subtypeL := by
rw [← U.adjoint_subtypeL, adjoint_adjoint]
/-- `E →L[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] E) : star A = A† :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →L[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem norm_adjoint_comp_self (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
‖ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A ∘L A‖ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
‖A† ∘L A‖ ≤ ‖A†‖ * ‖A‖ := opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· rw [← sq, ← Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (norm_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (Real.sqrt_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
have :=
calc
re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ ≤ ‖(A† ∘L A) x‖ * ‖x‖ := re_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ ‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
calc
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by rw [apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left]
_ ≤ √(‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt this
_ = √‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, Real.sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _) (‖x‖ * ‖x‖),
Real.sqrt_mul_self (norm_nonneg x)]
/-- The C⋆-algebra instance when `𝕜 := ℂ` can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.ContinuousLinearMap`. -/
instance : CStarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| norm_adjoint_comp_self x
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜)
(sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A (A†) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left, coe_coe]
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-! ### Self-adjoint operators -/
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjoint_eq {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
hA
/-- Every self-adjoint operator on an inner product space is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw_mod_cast [← A.adjoint_inner_right, hA.adjoint_eq]
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem conj_adjoint {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : E →L[𝕜] F) :
IsSelfAdjoint (S ∘L T ∘L ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem adjoint_conj {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : F →L[𝕜] E) :
IsSelfAdjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S ∘L T ∘L S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} :
IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
⟨fun hA => hA.isSymmetric, fun hA =>
ext fun x => ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => (A.adjoint_inner_left y x).symm ▸ (hA x y).symm⟩
theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint {A : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hA : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric) : IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rwa [← ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric] at hA
/-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem _root_.orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint (U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) :=
U.orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint
theorem conj_orthogonalProjection {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (U : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint
(U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection ∘L T ∘L U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [← (orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint U).adjoint_eq]
exact hT.adjoint_conj _
end IsSelfAdjoint
namespace LinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E]
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E}
/-- The **Hellinger--Toeplitz theorem**: Construct a self-adjoint operator from an everywhere
defined symmetric operator. -/
def IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : selfAdjoint (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨⟨T, hT.continuous⟩, ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr hT⟩
theorem IsSymmetric.coe_toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : (hT.toSelfAdjoint : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) = T :=
rfl
theorem IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint_apply (hT : IsSymmetric T) {x : E} :
(hT.toSelfAdjoint : E → E) x = T x :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G]
/- Porting note: Lean can't use `FiniteDimensional.complete` since it was generalized to topological
vector spaces. Use local instances instead. -/
/-- The adjoint of an operator from the finite-dimensional inner product space `E` to the
finite-dimensional inner product space `F`. -/
def adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] E :=
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
/- Note: Instead of the two instances above, the following works:
```
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
```
But removing one of the `have`s makes it fail. The reason is that `E` and `F` don't live
in the same universe, so the first `have` can no longer be used for `F` after its universe
metavariable has been assigned to that of `E`!
-/
((LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F).trans
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint.toLinearEquiv).trans
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
theorem adjoint_toContinuousLinearMap (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (LinearMap.adjoint A) =
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
theorem adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.adjoint A = ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjoint A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_left _ x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, adjoint A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_right _ x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : LinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.adjoint A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjoint_inner_right, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.adjoint (A ∘ₗ B) = LinearMap.adjoint B ∘ₗ LinearMap.adjoint A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
| exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all basis vectors `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis {ι₁ : Type*} {ι₂ : Type*} (b₁ : Basis ι₁ 𝕜 E) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ 𝕜 F)
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 381 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Box
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.EisensteinSeries.Defs
/-!
# Uniform convergence of Eisenstein series
We show that the sum of `eisSummand` converges locally uniformly on `ℍ` to the Eisenstein series
of weight `k` and level `Γ(N)` with congruence condition `a : Fin 2 → ZMod N`.
## Outline of argument
The key lemma `r_mul_max_le` shows that, for `z ∈ ℍ` and `c, d ∈ ℤ` (not both zero),
`|c z + d|` is bounded below by `r z * max (|c|, |d|)`, where `r z` is an explicit function of `z`
(independent of `c, d`) satisfying `0 < r z < 1` for all `z`.
We then show in `summable_one_div_rpow_max` that the sum of `max (|c|, |d|) ^ (-k)` over
`(c, d) ∈ ℤ × ℤ` is convergent for `2 < k`. This is proved by decomposing `ℤ × ℤ` using the
`Finset.box` lemmas.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex UpperHalfPlane Set Finset CongruenceSubgroup Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane
variable (z : ℍ)
namespace EisensteinSeries
| lemma norm_eq_max_natAbs (x : Fin 2 → ℤ) : ‖x‖ = max (x 0).natAbs (x 1).natAbs := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_natCast, NNReal.coe_inj, Nat.cast_max]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ ?_
simp only [pi_nnnorm_le_iff, Fin.forall_fin_two, max_le_iff, NNReal.natCast_natAbs]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/EisensteinSeries/UniformConvergence.lean | 41 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Retract
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
/-!
# Quasi-isomorphisms
A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism if it induces isomorphisms on homology.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
universe v u
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
{c : ComplexShape ι} {K L M K' L' : HomologicalComplex C c}
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism in degree `i`
when it induces a quasi-isomorphism of short complexes `K.sc i ⟶ L.sc i`. -/
class QuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] : Prop where
quasiIso : ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact h.quasiIso
· intro h
exact ⟨h⟩
instance quasiIsoAt_of_isIso (f : K ⟶ L) [IsIso f] (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
infer_instance
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff' (f : K ⟶ L) (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [(K.sc' i j k).HasHomology] [(L.sc' i j k).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f j ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).map f) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso _ _
(Arrow.isoOfNatIso (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) (Arrow.mk f))
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_retract {f : K ⟶ L} {f' : K' ⟶ L'}
(h : RetractArrow f f') (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[K'.HasHomology i] [L'.HasHomology i] [hf' : QuasiIsoAt f' i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hf' ⊢
have : RetractArrow ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f') := h.map (shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapArrow
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_of_retract this
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff]
rfl
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hK : K.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ L.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hK ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hK (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h).symm
· intro hL
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hL : L.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ K.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hL ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hL (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h)
· intro hK
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma exactAt_iff_of_quasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [QuasiIsoAt f i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ L.ExactAt i :=
⟨fun hK => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt f i hK).1 inferInstance,
fun hL => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' f i hL).1 inferInstance⟩
instance (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [hf : QuasiIsoAt f i] :
IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
simpa only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff] using hf
/-- The isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ L.homology i` induced by a morphism `f : K ⟶ L` such
that `[QuasiIsoAt f i]` holds. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoOfQuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] : K.homology i ≅ L.homology i :=
asIso (homologyMap f i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_hom_inv_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
homologyMap f i ≫ (isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_inv_hom_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv ≫ homologyMap f i = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv_hom_id
lemma CochainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : CochainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 0 0 1).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
lemma ChainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : ChainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 1 0 0).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism when it
is so in every degree, i.e. when the induced maps `homologyMap f i : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i`
are all isomorphisms (see `quasiIso_iff` and `quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap`). -/
class QuasiIso (f : K ⟶ L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] : Prop where
quasiIsoAt : ∀ i, QuasiIsoAt f i := by infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff (f : K ⟶ L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiIsoAt f i :=
⟨fun h => h.quasiIsoAt, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
attribute [instance] QuasiIso.quasiIsoAt
instance quasiIso_of_isIso (f : K ⟶ L) [IsIso f] [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso f where
instance quasiIsoAt_comp (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] [hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hφ hφ' ⊢
rw [Functor.map_comp]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_comp _ _
instance quasiIso_comp (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') where
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] [hφφ' : QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i] :
QuasiIsoAt φ' i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap] at hφ hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left (homologyMap φ i) (homologyMap φ' i)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ' i := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIsoAt_of_comp_left φ φ' i
· intro
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ' := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_left φ φ']
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_left (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ' := by
rw [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left φ φ']
infer_instance
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] [hφφ' : QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i] :
QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap] at hφ' hφφ' ⊢
rw [homologyMap_comp] at hφφ'
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right (homologyMap φ i) (homologyMap φ' i)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i]
[L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIsoAt φ' i] :
QuasiIsoAt (φ ≫ φ') i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
constructor
· intro
exact quasiIsoAt_of_comp_right φ φ' i
· intro
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ' : QuasiIso φ'] :
QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ') ↔ QuasiIso φ := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_iff_comp_right φ φ']
lemma quasiIso_of_comp_right (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : L ⟶ M) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, L.HasHomology i] [∀ i, M.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ'] [hφφ' : QuasiIso (φ ≫ φ')] :
QuasiIso φ := by
rw [← quasiIso_iff_comp_right φ φ']
infer_instance
lemma quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : K' ⟶ L') (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ')
[∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIso φ ↔ QuasiIso φ' := by
simp [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left (show K' ⟶ K from e.inv.left) φ,
← quasiIso_iff_comp_right φ' (show L' ⟶ L from e.inv.right)]
lemma quasiIso_of_arrow_mk_iso (φ : K ⟶ L) (φ' : K' ⟶ L') (e : Arrow.mk φ ≅ Arrow.mk φ')
[∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i]
[hφ : QuasiIso φ] : QuasiIso φ' := by
simpa only [← quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso φ φ' e]
lemma quasiIso_of_retractArrow {f : K ⟶ L} {f' : K' ⟶ L'}
(h : RetractArrow f f') [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, K'.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L'.HasHomology i] [QuasiIso f'] :
QuasiIso f where
quasiIsoAt i := quasiIsoAt_of_retract h i
namespace HomologicalComplex
section PreservesHomology
variable {C₁ C₂ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Preadditive C₁] [Preadditive C₂]
{K L : HomologicalComplex C₁ c} (φ : K ⟶ L) (F : C₁ ⥤ C₂) [F.Additive]
[F.PreservesHomology]
section
variable (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj K).HasHomology i]
[((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj L).HasHomology i]
instance quasiIsoAt_map_of_preservesHomology [hφ : QuasiIsoAt φ i] :
QuasiIsoAt ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hφ ⊢
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_map_of_preservesLeftHomology F
((shortComplexFunctor C₁ c i).map φ)
lemma quasiIsoAt_map_iff_of_preservesHomology [F.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
QuasiIsoAt ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) i ↔ QuasiIsoAt φ i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_map_iff_of_preservesLeftHomology F
((shortComplexFunctor C₁ c i).map φ)
end
section
variable [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
[∀ i, ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj K).HasHomology i]
[∀ i, ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).obj L).HasHomology i]
instance quasiIso_map_of_preservesHomology [hφ : QuasiIso φ] :
QuasiIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) where
lemma quasiIso_map_iff_of_preservesHomology [F.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
QuasiIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map φ) ↔ QuasiIso φ := by
simp only [quasiIso_iff, quasiIsoAt_map_iff_of_preservesHomology φ F]
end
end PreservesHomology
variable (C c)
/-- The morphism property on `HomologicalComplex C c` given by quasi-isomorphisms. -/
def quasiIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
MorphismProperty (HomologicalComplex C c) := fun _ _ f => QuasiIso f
variable {C c} [CategoryWithHomology C]
@[simp]
lemma mem_quasiIso_iff (f : K ⟶ L) : quasiIso C c f ↔ QuasiIso f := by rfl
instance : (quasiIso C c).IsMultiplicative where
id_mem _ := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff]
infer_instance
comp_mem _ _ hf hg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf hg ⊢
infer_instance
instance : (quasiIso C c).HasTwoOutOfThreeProperty where
of_postcomp f g hg hfg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hg hfg ⊢
rwa [← quasiIso_iff_comp_right f g]
of_precomp f g hf hfg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf hfg ⊢
rwa [← quasiIso_iff_comp_left f g]
instance : (quasiIso C c).IsStableUnderRetracts where
of_retract h hg := by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hg ⊢
exact quasiIso_of_retractArrow h
instance : (quasiIso C c).RespectsIso :=
MorphismProperty.respectsIso_of_isStableUnderComposition
(fun _ _ _ (_ : IsIso _) ↦ by rw [mem_quasiIso_iff]; infer_instance)
end HomologicalComplex
end
section
variable {ι : Type*} {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
{c : ComplexShape ι} {K L : HomologicalComplex C c}
(e : HomotopyEquiv K L) [∀ i, K.HasHomology i] [∀ i, L.HasHomology i]
instance : QuasiIso e.hom where
quasiIsoAt n := by
classical
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap]
exact (e.toHomologyIso n).isIso_hom
instance : QuasiIso e.inv := (inferInstance : QuasiIso e.symm.hom)
variable (C c)
lemma homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homotopyEquivalences C c ≤ quasiIso C c := by
rintro K L _ ⟨e, rfl⟩
simp only [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff]
infer_instance
end
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/QuasiIso.lean | 375 | 381 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Defs
/-!
# Basic kernels
This file contains basic results about kernels in general and definitions of some particular
kernels.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f)`:
kernel `a ↦ Measure.dirac (f a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.id`: the identity kernel, deterministic kernel for
the identity function.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.copy α`: the deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to
the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.discard α`: the Markov kernel to the type `Unit`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.swap α β`: the deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to
the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.const α (μβ : measure β)`: constant kernel `a ↦ μβ`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.restrict κ (hs : MeasurableSet s)`: kernel for which the image of
`a : α` is `(κ a).restrict s`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(κ.restrict hs a) = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂(κ a)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight`: Kernel with value `(κ a).comap f`,
for a measurable embedding `f`. That is, for a measurable set `t : Set β`,
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight κ hf a t = κ a (f '' t)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.piecewise (hs : MeasurableSet s) κ η`: the kernel equal to `κ`
on the measurable set `s` and to `η` on its complement.
## Main statements
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open MeasureTheory
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {κ : Kernel α β}
namespace Kernel
section Deterministic
/-- Kernel which to `a` associates the dirac measure at `f a`. This is a Markov kernel. -/
noncomputable def deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := Measure.dirac (f a)
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator (hf hs)
theorem deterministic_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
deterministic f hf a = Measure.dirac (f a) :=
rfl
theorem deterministic_apply' {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : deterministic f hf a s = s.indicator (fun _ => 1) (f a) := by
rw [deterministic]
change Measure.dirac (f a) s = s.indicator 1 (f a)
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
/-- Because of the measurability field in `Kernel.deterministic`, `rw [h]` will not rewrite
`deterministic f hf` to `deterministic g ⋯`. Instead one can do `rw [deterministic_congr h]`. -/
theorem deterministic_congr {f g : α → β} {hf : Measurable f} (h : f = g) :
deterministic f hf = deterministic g (h ▸ hf) := by
conv_lhs => enter [1]; rw [h]
instance isMarkovKernel_deterministic {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMarkovKernel (deterministic f hf) :=
⟨fun a => by rw [deterministic_apply hf]; infer_instance⟩
theorem lintegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac (g a) f]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac' hf hs]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] (s : Set β) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac f s]
end Deterministic
section Id
/-- The identity kernel, that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `x`. -/
protected noncomputable
def id : Kernel α α := Kernel.deterministic id measurable_id
instance : IsMarkovKernel (Kernel.id : Kernel α α) := by rw [Kernel.id]; infer_instance
lemma id_apply (a : α) : Kernel.id a = Measure.dirac a := by
rw [Kernel.id, deterministic_apply, id_def]
lemma lintegral_id' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
lemma lintegral_id [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac]
end Id
section Copy
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`. -/
noncomputable
def copy (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α (α × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (measurable_id.prod measurable_id)
instance : IsMarkovKernel (copy α) := by rw [copy]; infer_instance
lemma copy_apply (a : α) : copy α a = Measure.dirac (a, a) := by simp [copy, deterministic_apply]
end Copy
section Discard
/-- The Markov kernel to the `Unit` type. -/
noncomputable
def discard (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α Unit :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun _ ↦ ()) measurable_const
instance : IsMarkovKernel (discard α) := by rw [discard]; infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma discard_apply (a : α) : discard α a = Measure.dirac () := deterministic_apply _ _
end Discard
section Swap
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`. -/
noncomputable
def swap (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] : Kernel (α × β) (β × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic Prod.swap measurable_swap
instance : IsMarkovKernel (swap α β) := by rw [swap]; infer_instance
/-- See `swap_apply'` for a fully applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply (ab : α × β) : swap α β ab = Measure.dirac ab.swap := by
rw [swap, deterministic_apply]
/-- See `swap_apply` for a partially applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply' (ab : α × β) {s : Set (β × α)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
swap α β ab s = s.indicator 1 ab.swap := by
rw [swap_apply, Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
end Swap
section Const
/-- Constant kernel, which always returns the same measure. -/
def const (α : Type*) {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} (μβ : Measure β) :
Kernel α β where
toFun _ := μβ
measurable' := measurable_const
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (μβ : Measure β) (a : α) : const α μβ a = μβ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma const_zero : const α (0 : Measure β) = 0 := by
ext x s _; simp [const_apply]
lemma const_add (β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace β] (μ ν : Measure α) :
const β (μ + ν) = const β μ + const β ν := by ext; simp
lemma sum_const [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure β) :
Kernel.sum (fun n ↦ const α (μ n)) = const α (Measure.sum μ) := rfl
instance const.instIsFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [IsFiniteMeasure μβ] :
IsFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨⟨μβ Set.univ, measure_lt_top _ _, fun _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
instance const.instIsSFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [SFinite μβ] :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun n ↦ const α (sfiniteSeq μβ n), fun n ↦ inferInstance, by rw [sum_const, sum_sfiniteSeq]⟩
instance const.instIsMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsMarkovKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun _ => hμβ⟩
instance const.instIsZeroOrMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsZeroOrMarkovKernel (const α μβ) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_isProbabilityMeasure μβ with rfl | h
· simp only [const_zero]
infer_instance
· infer_instance
lemma isSFiniteKernel_const [Nonempty α] {μβ : Measure β} :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) ↔ SFinite μβ :=
| ⟨fun h ↦ h.sFinite (Classical.arbitrary α), fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean | 214 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
|
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 582 | 585 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Complete
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each `Lᵖ` Borel measurable function can be approximated in `Lᵖ` norm
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Lp.simpleFunc`, the type of `Lp` simple functions
* `coeToLp`, the embedding of `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` into `Lp E p μ`
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm` (Lᵖ convergence): If `E` is a `NormedAddCommGroup` and `f` is
measurable and `MemLp` (for `p < ∞`), then the simple functions
`SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n` may be considered as elements of `Lp E p μ`, and they tend
in Lᵖ to `f`.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.isDenseEmbedding`: the embedding `coeToLp` of the `Lp` simple functions into
`Lp` is dense.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.induction`, `Lp.induction`, `MemLp.induction`, `Integrable.induction`: to prove
a predicate for all elements of one of these classes of functions, it suffices to check that it
behaves correctly on simple functions.
## TODO
For `E` finite-dimensional, simple functions `α →ₛ E` are dense in L^∞ -- prove this.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`: the type of `L1` simple functions `α → β`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Lp approximation by simple functions -/
section Lp
variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
{q : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem nnnorm_approxOn_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖₊ := by
have := edist_approxOn_le hf h₀ x n
rw [edist_comm y₀] at this
simp only [edist_nndist, nndist_eq_nnnorm] at this
exact mod_cast this
theorem norm_approxOn_y₀_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀‖ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
theorem norm_approxOn_zero_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
(h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ + ‖f x‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {μ : Measure β}
(hμ : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) (hi : eLpNorm (fun x => f x - y₀) p μ < ∞) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (⇑(approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n) - f) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simpa only [hp_zero, eLpNorm_exponent_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := toReal_pos hp_zero hp_ne_top
suffices Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simp only [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_zero hp_ne_top]
convert continuous_rpow_const.continuousAt.tendsto.comp this
simp [zero_rpow_of_pos (_root_.inv_pos.mpr hp)]
-- We simply check the conditions of the Dominated Convergence Theorem:
-- (1) The function "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" is measurable
have hF_meas n : Measurable fun x => ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal := by
simpa only [← edist_eq_enorm_sub] using
(approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n).measurable_bind (fun y x => edist y (f x) ^ p.toReal) fun y =>
(measurable_edist_right.comp hf).pow_const p.toReal
-- (2) The functions "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" are uniformly
-- bounded, at any given point, by `fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ ^ p.toReal`
have h_bound n :
(fun x ↦ ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) ≤ᵐ[μ] (‖f · - y₀‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) :=
.of_forall fun x => rpow_le_rpow (coe_mono (nnnorm_approxOn_le hf h₀ x n)) toReal_nonneg
-- (3) The bounding function `fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ ^ p.toReal` has finite integral
have h_fin : (∫⁻ a : β, ‖f a - y₀‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ≠ ⊤ :=
(lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_ne_top hi).ne
-- (4) The functions "`p`-th power of distance between `f` and the approximation" tend pointwise
-- to zero
have h_lim :
∀ᵐ a : β ∂μ, Tendsto (‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ · a - f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
filter_upwards [hμ] with a ha
have : Tendsto (fun n => (approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n) a - f a) atTop (𝓝 (f a - f a)) :=
(tendsto_approxOn hf h₀ ha).sub tendsto_const_nhds
convert continuous_rpow_const.continuousAt.tendsto.comp (tendsto_coe.mpr this.nnnorm)
simp [zero_rpow_of_pos hp]
-- Then we apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem
simpa using tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence _ hF_meas h_bound h_fin h_lim
theorem memLp_approxOn [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
(hf : MemLp f p μ) {s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s]
(hi₀ : MemLp (fun _ => y₀) p μ) (n : ℕ) : MemLp (approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n) p μ := by
refine ⟨(approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
suffices eLpNorm (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ < ⊤ by
have : MemLp (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ :=
⟨(approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n - const β y₀).aestronglyMeasurable, this⟩
convert eLpNorm_add_lt_top this hi₀
ext x
simp
have hf' : MemLp (fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖) p μ := by
have h_meas : Measurable fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ := by
simp only [← dist_eq_norm]
exact (continuous_id.dist continuous_const).measurable.comp fmeas
refine ⟨h_meas.aemeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_norm]
convert eLpNorm_add_lt_top hf hi₀.neg with x
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀‖ ≤ ‖‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖‖ := by
filter_upwards with x
convert norm_approxOn_y₀_le fmeas h₀ x n using 1
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]
positivity
calc
eLpNorm (fun x => approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀) p μ ≤
eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖) p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae this
_ < ⊤ := eLpNorm_add_lt_top hf' hf'
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)]
(hf : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (⇑(approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) - f) p μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm fmeas _ hp_ne_top ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards with x using subset_closure (by simp)
· simpa using hf
theorem memLp_approxOn_range [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (hf : MemLp f p μ) (n : ℕ) :
MemLp (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) p μ :=
memLp_approxOn fmeas hf (y₀ := 0) (by simp) MemLp.zero n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f) [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)]
(hf : MemLp f p μ) :
Tendsto
(fun n =>
(memLp_approxOn_range fmeas hf n).toLp (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n))
atTop (𝓝 (hf.toLp f)) := by
simpa only [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm''] using
tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm hp_ne_top fmeas hf.2
/-- Any function in `ℒp` can be approximated by a simple function if `p < ∞`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.exists_simpleFunc_eLpNorm_sub_lt {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ g : β →ₛ E, eLpNorm (f - ⇑g) p μ < ε ∧ MemLp g p μ := by
borelize E
let f' := hf.1.mk f
rsuffices ⟨g, hg, g_mem⟩ : ∃ g : β →ₛ E, eLpNorm (f' - ⇑g) p μ < ε ∧ MemLp g p μ
· refine ⟨g, ?_, g_mem⟩
suffices eLpNorm (f - ⇑g) p μ = eLpNorm (f' - ⇑g) p μ by rwa [this]
apply eLpNorm_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simpa only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_left_inj] using hx
have hf' : MemLp f' p μ := hf.ae_eq hf.1.ae_eq_mk
have f'meas : Measurable f' := hf.1.measurable_mk
have : SeparableSpace (range f' ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
StronglyMeasurable.separableSpace_range_union_singleton hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk
rcases ((tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp_eLpNorm hp_ne_top f'meas hf'.2).eventually <|
gt_mem_nhds hε.bot_lt).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [← eLpNorm_neg, neg_sub] at hn
exact ⟨_, hn, memLp_approxOn_range f'meas hf' _⟩
end Lp
/-! ### L1 approximation by simple functions -/
section Integrable
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] {μ : Measure β}
(hμ : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) (hi : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => f x - y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm] using
tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm hf h₀ one_ne_top hμ
(by simpa [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm] using hi)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias tendsto_approxOn_L1_nnnorm := tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm
theorem integrable_approxOn [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
(hf : Integrable f μ) {s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s]
(hi₀ : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) (n : ℕ) : Integrable (approxOn f fmeas s y₀ h₀ n) μ := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hi₀ ⊢
exact memLp_approxOn fmeas hf h₀ hi₀ n
theorem tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_enorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β}
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, ‖approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) atTop
(𝓝 0) := by
apply tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm fmeas
· filter_upwards with x using subset_closure (by simp)
· simpa using hf.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_nnnorm := tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_enorm
theorem integrable_approxOn_range [BorelSpace E] {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} (fmeas : Measurable f)
[SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E)] (hf : Integrable f μ) (n : ℕ) :
Integrable (approxOn f fmeas (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n) μ :=
integrable_approxOn fmeas hf _ (integrable_zero _ _ _) n
end Integrable
section SimpleFuncProperties
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable {μ : Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
/-!
### Properties of simple functions in `Lp` spaces
A simple function `f : α →ₛ E` into a normed group `E` verifies, for a measure `μ`:
- `MemLp f 0 μ` and `MemLp f ∞ μ`, since `f` is a.e.-measurable and bounded,
- for `0 < p < ∞`,
`MemLp f p μ ↔ Integrable f μ ↔ f.FinMeasSupp μ ↔ ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞`.
-/
theorem exists_forall_norm_le (f : α →ₛ F) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
exists_forall_le (f.map fun x => ‖x‖)
theorem memLp_zero (f : α →ₛ E) (μ : Measure α) : MemLp f 0 μ :=
memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mpr f.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem memLp_top (f : α →ₛ E) (μ : Measure α) : MemLp f ∞ μ :=
let ⟨C, hfC⟩ := f.exists_forall_norm_le
memLp_top_of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable C <| Eventually.of_forall hfC
protected theorem eLpNorm'_eq {p : ℝ} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm' f p μ = (∑ y ∈ f.range, ‖y‖ₑ ^ p * μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) ^ (1 / p) := by
have h_map : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ p) = f.map (‖·‖ₑ ^ p) := by simp; rfl
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, h_map, lintegral_eq_lintegral, map_lintegral]
theorem measure_preimage_lt_top_of_memLp (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (f : α →ₛ E)
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (y : E) (hy_ne : y ≠ 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ := by
have hp_pos_real : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_pos hp_ne_top
have hf_eLpNorm := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top hf
rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_pos hp_ne_top, f.eLpNorm'_eq, one_div,
← @ENNReal.lt_rpow_inv_iff _ _ p.toReal⁻¹ (by simp [hp_pos_real]),
@ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos p.toReal⁻¹⁻¹ (by simp [hp_pos_real]),
ENNReal.sum_lt_top] at hf_eLpNorm
by_cases hyf : y ∈ f.range
swap
· suffices h_empty : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ by
rw [h_empty, measure_empty]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top
ext1 x
rw [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
refine fun hxy => hyf ?_
rw [mem_range, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨x, hxy⟩
specialize hf_eLpNorm y hyf
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff] at hf_eLpNorm
cases hf_eLpNorm with
| inl hf_eLpNorm => exact hf_eLpNorm.2
| inr hf_eLpNorm =>
cases hf_eLpNorm with
| inl hf_eLpNorm =>
refine absurd ?_ hy_ne
simpa [hp_pos_real] using hf_eLpNorm
| inr hf_eLpNorm => simp [hf_eLpNorm]
theorem memLp_of_finite_measure_preimage (p : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞) : MemLp f p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· rw [hp0, memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable]; exact f.aestronglyMeasurable
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· rw [hp_top]; exact memLp_top f μ
refine ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp0 hp_top, f.eLpNorm'_eq]
refine ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp) (ENNReal.sum_lt_top.mpr fun y _ => ?_).ne
by_cases hy0 : y = 0
· simp [hy0, ENNReal.toReal_pos hp0 hp_top]
· refine ENNReal.mul_lt_top ?_ (hf y hy0)
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg ENNReal.coe_ne_top
theorem memLp_iff {f : α →ₛ E} (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp f p μ ↔ ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ :=
⟨fun h => measure_preimage_lt_top_of_memLp hp_pos hp_ne_top f h, fun h =>
memLp_of_finite_measure_preimage p h⟩
theorem integrable_iff {f : α →ₛ E} : Integrable f μ ↔ ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.symm.trans <| memLp_iff one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top
theorem memLp_iff_integrable {f : α →ₛ E} (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp f p μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
(memLp_iff hp_pos hp_ne_top).trans integrable_iff.symm
theorem memLp_iff_finMeasSupp {f : α →ₛ E} (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp f p μ ↔ f.FinMeasSupp μ :=
(memLp_iff hp_pos hp_ne_top).trans finMeasSupp_iff.symm
theorem integrable_iff_finMeasSupp {f : α →ₛ E} : Integrable f μ ↔ f.FinMeasSupp μ :=
integrable_iff.trans finMeasSupp_iff.symm
theorem FinMeasSupp.integrable {f : α →ₛ E} (h : f.FinMeasSupp μ) : Integrable f μ :=
integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.2 h
theorem integrable_pair {f : α →ₛ E} {g : α →ₛ F} :
Integrable f μ → Integrable g μ → Integrable (pair f g) μ := by
simpa only [integrable_iff_finMeasSupp] using FinMeasSupp.pair
theorem memLp_of_isFiniteMeasure (f : α →ₛ E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp f p μ :=
let ⟨C, hfC⟩ := f.exists_forall_norm_le
MemLp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable C <| Eventually.of_forall hfC
@[fun_prop]
theorem integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α →ₛ E) : Integrable f μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.mp (f.memLp_of_isFiniteMeasure 1 μ)
theorem measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) {x : E}
(hx : x ≠ 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) < ∞ :=
integrable_iff.mp hf x hx
theorem measure_support_lt_top_of_memLp (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : μ (support f) < ∞ :=
f.measure_support_lt_top ((memLp_iff hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).mp hf)
theorem measure_support_lt_top_of_integrable (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ (support f) < ∞ :=
f.measure_support_lt_top (integrable_iff.mp hf)
theorem measure_lt_top_of_memLp_indicator (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0)
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hcs : MemLp ((const α c).piecewise s hs (const α 0)) p μ) :
μ s < ⊤ := by
have : Function.support (const α c) = Set.univ := Function.support_const hc
simpa only [memLp_iff_finMeasSupp hp_pos hp_ne_top, finMeasSupp_iff_support,
support_indicator, Set.inter_univ, this] using hcs
end SimpleFuncProperties
end SimpleFunc
/-! Construction of the space of `Lp` simple functions, and its dense embedding into `Lp`. -/
namespace Lp
open AEEqFun
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α)
variable (E)
/-- `Lp.simpleFunc` is a subspace of Lp consisting of equivalence classes of an integrable simple
function. -/
def simpleFunc : AddSubgroup (Lp E p μ) where
carrier := { f : Lp E p μ | ∃ s : α →ₛ E, (AEEqFun.mk s s.aestronglyMeasurable : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f }
zero_mem' := ⟨0, rfl⟩
add_mem' := by
rintro f g ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩
use s + t
simp only [← hs, ← ht, AEEqFun.mk_add_mk, AddSubgroup.coe_add, AEEqFun.mk_eq_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_add]
neg_mem' := by
rintro f ⟨s, hs⟩
use -s
simp only [← hs, AEEqFun.neg_mk, SimpleFunc.coe_neg, AEEqFun.mk_eq_mk, AddSubgroup.coe_neg]
variable {E p μ}
namespace simpleFunc
section Instances
/-! Simple functions in Lp space form a `NormedSpace`. -/
protected theorem eq' {f g : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ} : (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) = (g : α →ₘ[μ] E) → f = g :=
Subtype.eq ∘ Subtype.eq
/-! Implementation note: If `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` were defined as a `𝕜`-submodule of `Lp E p μ`,
then the next few lemmas, putting a normed `𝕜`-group structure on `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ`, would be
unnecessary. But instead, `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` is defined as an `AddSubgroup` of `Lp E p μ`,
which does not permit this (but has the advantage of working when `E` itself is a normed group,
i.e. has no scalar action). -/
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- If `E` is a normed space, `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` is a `SMul`. Not declared as an
instance as it is (as of writing) used only in the construction of the Bochner integral. -/
protected def smul : SMul 𝕜 (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :=
⟨fun k f =>
⟨k • (f : Lp E p μ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, ⟨s, hs⟩⟩
use k • s
apply Eq.trans (AEEqFun.smul_mk k s s.aestronglyMeasurable).symm _
rw [hs]
rfl⟩⟩
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.smul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
((c • f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : Lp E p μ) = c • (f : Lp E p μ) :=
rfl
/-- If `E` is a normed space, `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` is a module. Not declared as an
instance as it is (as of writing) used only in the construction of the Bochner integral. -/
protected def module : Module 𝕜 (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) where
one_smul f := by ext1; exact one_smul _ _
mul_smul x y f := by ext1; exact mul_smul _ _ _
smul_add x f g := by ext1; exact smul_add _ _ _
smul_zero x := by ext1; exact smul_zero _
add_smul x y f := by ext1; exact add_smul _ _ _
zero_smul f := by ext1; exact zero_smul _ _
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.module
/-- If `E` is a normed space, `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` is a normed space. Not declared as an
instance as it is (as of writing) used only in the construction of the Bochner integral. -/
protected theorem isBoundedSMul [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :=
IsBoundedSMul.of_norm_smul_le fun r f => (norm_smul_le r (f : Lp E p μ) :)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] protected alias boundedSMul := simpleFunc.isBoundedSMul
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.isBoundedSMul
/-- If `E` is a normed space, `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` is a normed space. Not declared as an
instance as it is (as of writing) used only in the construction of the Bochner integral. -/
protected def normedSpace {𝕜} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
NormedSpace 𝕜 (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :=
⟨norm_smul_le (α := 𝕜) (β := Lp.simpleFunc E p μ)⟩
end Instances
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.module simpleFunc.normedSpace simpleFunc.isBoundedSMul
section ToLp
/-- Construct the equivalence class `[f]` of a simple function `f` satisfying `MemLp`. -/
abbrev toLp (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ :=
⟨hf.toLp f, ⟨f, rfl⟩⟩
theorem toLp_eq_toLp (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) : (toLp f hf : Lp E p μ) = hf.toLp f :=
rfl
theorem toLp_eq_mk (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) :
(toLp f hf : α →ₘ[μ] E) = AEEqFun.mk f f.aestronglyMeasurable :=
rfl
theorem toLp_zero : toLp (0 : α →ₛ E) MemLp.zero = (0 : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :=
rfl
theorem toLp_add (f g : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
toLp (f + g) (hf.add hg) = toLp f hf + toLp g hg :=
rfl
theorem toLp_neg (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) : toLp (-f) hf.neg = -toLp f hf :=
rfl
theorem toLp_sub (f g : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
toLp (f - g) (hf.sub hg) = toLp f hf - toLp g hg := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toLp_neg, ← toLp_add]
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem toLp_smul (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) (c : 𝕜) :
toLp (c • f) (hf.const_smul c) = c • toLp f hf :=
rfl
nonrec theorem norm_toLp [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : MemLp f p μ) :
‖toLp f hf‖ = ENNReal.toReal (eLpNorm f p μ) :=
norm_toLp f hf
end ToLp
section ToSimpleFunc
/-- Find a representative of a `Lp.simpleFunc`. -/
def toSimpleFunc (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : α →ₛ E :=
Classical.choose f.2
/-- `(toSimpleFunc f)` is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
protected theorem measurable [MeasurableSpace E] (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
Measurable (toSimpleFunc f) :=
(toSimpleFunc f).measurable
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
StronglyMeasurable (toSimpleFunc f) :=
(toSimpleFunc f).stronglyMeasurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace E] (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
AEMeasurable (toSimpleFunc f) μ :=
(simpleFunc.measurable f).aemeasurable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (toSimpleFunc f) μ :=
(simpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable f).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
show ⇑(toSimpleFunc f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(f : α →ₘ[μ] E) by
convert (AEEqFun.coeFn_mk (toSimpleFunc f)
(toSimpleFunc f).aestronglyMeasurable).symm using 2
exact (Classical.choose_spec f.2).symm
/-- `toSimpleFunc f` satisfies the predicate `MemLp`. -/
protected theorem memLp (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : MemLp (toSimpleFunc f) p μ :=
MemLp.ae_eq (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).symm <| mem_Lp_iff_memLp.mp (f : Lp E p μ).2
theorem toLp_toSimpleFunc (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
toLp (toSimpleFunc f) (simpleFunc.memLp f) = f :=
simpleFunc.eq' (Classical.choose_spec f.2)
theorem toSimpleFunc_toLp (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : MemLp f p μ) : toSimpleFunc (toLp f hfi) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [← AEEqFun.mk_eq_mk]; exact Classical.choose_spec (toLp f hfi).2
variable (E μ)
theorem zero_toSimpleFunc : toSimpleFunc (0 : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (0 : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ),
Lp.coeFn_zero E 1 μ] with _ h₁ _
rwa [h₁]
variable {E μ}
theorem add_toSimpleFunc (f g : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
toSimpleFunc (f + g) =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f + toSimpleFunc g := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (f + g), toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f,
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun g, Lp.coeFn_add (f : Lp E p μ) g] with _
simp only [AddSubgroup.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
iterate 4 intro h; rw [h]
theorem neg_toSimpleFunc (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] -toSimpleFunc f := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (-f), toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f,
Lp.coeFn_neg (f : Lp E p μ)] with _
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, AddSubgroup.coe_neg]
repeat intro h; rw [h]
theorem sub_toSimpleFunc (f g : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
toSimpleFunc (f - g) =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f - toSimpleFunc g := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (f - g), toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f,
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun g, Lp.coeFn_sub (f : Lp E p μ) g] with _
simp only [AddSubgroup.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
repeat' intro h; rw [h]
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem smul_toSimpleFunc (k : 𝕜) (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
toSimpleFunc (k • f) =ᵐ[μ] k • ⇑(toSimpleFunc f) := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (k • f), toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f,
Lp.coeFn_smul k (f : Lp E p μ)] with _
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, coe_smul]
repeat intro h; rw [h]
theorem norm_toSimpleFunc [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) :
‖f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (eLpNorm (toSimpleFunc f) p μ) := by
simpa [toLp_toSimpleFunc] using norm_toLp (toSimpleFunc f) (simpleFunc.memLp f)
end ToSimpleFunc
section Induction
variable (p) in
/-- The characteristic function of a finite-measure measurable set `s`, as an `Lp` simple function.
-/
def indicatorConst {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
Lp.simpleFunc E p μ :=
toLp ((SimpleFunc.const _ c).piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const _ 0))
(memLp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
@[simp]
theorem coe_indicatorConst {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
(↑(indicatorConst p hs hμs c) : Lp E p μ) = indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c :=
rfl
theorem toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
toSimpleFunc (indicatorConst p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ]
(SimpleFunc.const _ c).piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const _ 0) :=
Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_toLp _ _
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary `Lp` simple function, with `0 < p < ∞`, it suffices to show
that the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions of finite-measure measurable
sets and is closed under addition (of functions with disjoint support). -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {P : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Prop}
(indicatorConst :
∀ (c : E) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞),
P (Lp.simpleFunc.indicatorConst p hs hμs.ne c))
(add :
∀ ⦃f g : α →ₛ E⦄,
∀ hf : MemLp f p μ,
∀ hg : MemLp g p μ,
Disjoint (support f) (support g) →
P (Lp.simpleFunc.toLp f hf) →
P (Lp.simpleFunc.toLp g hg) → P (Lp.simpleFunc.toLp f hf + Lp.simpleFunc.toLp g hg))
(f : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) : P f := by
suffices ∀ f : α →ₛ E, ∀ hf : MemLp f p μ, P (toLp f hf) by
rw [← toLp_toSimpleFunc f]
apply this
clear f
apply SimpleFunc.induction
· intro c s hs hf
by_cases hc : c = 0
· convert indicatorConst 0 MeasurableSet.empty (by simp) using 1
ext1
simp [hc]
exact indicatorConst c hs
(SimpleFunc.measure_lt_top_of_memLp_indicator hp_pos hp_ne_top hc hs hf)
· intro f g hfg hf hg hfg'
obtain ⟨hf', hg'⟩ : MemLp f p μ ∧ MemLp g p μ :=
(memLp_add_of_disjoint hfg f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable).mp hfg'
exact add hf' hg' hfg (hf hf') (hg hg')
end Induction
section CoeToLp
variable [Fact (1 ≤ p)]
protected theorem uniformContinuous : UniformContinuous ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
lemma isUniformEmbedding : IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) :=
isUniformEmbedding_comap Subtype.val_injective
theorem isUniformInducing : IsUniformInducing ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) :=
simpleFunc.isUniformEmbedding.isUniformInducing
lemma isDenseEmbedding (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
IsDenseEmbedding ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) := by
borelize E
apply simpleFunc.isUniformEmbedding.isDenseEmbedding
intro f
rw [mem_closure_iff_seq_limit]
have hfi' : MemLp f p μ := Lp.memLp f
haveI : SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
(Lp.stronglyMeasurable f).separableSpace_range_union_singleton
refine
⟨fun n =>
toLp
(SimpleFunc.approxOn f (Lp.stronglyMeasurable f).measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 _ n)
(SimpleFunc.memLp_approxOn_range (Lp.stronglyMeasurable f).measurable hfi' n),
fun n => mem_range_self _, ?_⟩
convert SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_range_Lp hp_ne_top (Lp.stronglyMeasurable f).measurable hfi'
rw [toLp_coeFn f (Lp.memLp f)]
protected theorem isDenseInducing (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
IsDenseInducing ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) :=
(simpleFunc.isDenseEmbedding hp_ne_top).isDenseInducing
protected theorem denseRange (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
DenseRange ((↑) : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ → Lp E p μ) :=
(simpleFunc.isDenseInducing hp_ne_top).dense
protected theorem dense (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : Dense (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ : Set (Lp E p μ)) := by
simpa only [denseRange_subtype_val] using simpleFunc.denseRange (E := E) (μ := μ) hp_ne_top
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
variable (α E 𝕜)
/-- The embedding of Lp simple functions into Lp functions, as a continuous linear map. -/
def coeToLp : Lp.simpleFunc E p μ →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
{ AddSubgroup.subtype (Lp.simpleFunc E p μ) with
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl
cont := Lp.simpleFunc.uniformContinuous.continuous }
variable {α E 𝕜}
| end CoeToLp
section Order
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G]
theorem coeFn_le [PartialOrder G] (f g : Lp.simpleFunc G p μ) : (f : α → G) ≤ᵐ[μ] g ↔ f ≤ g := by
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, ← Lp.coeFn_le]
instance instAddLeftMono [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G] :
AddLeftMono (Lp.simpleFunc G p μ) := by
refine ⟨fun f g₁ g₂ hg₁₂ => ?_⟩
exact add_le_add_left hg₁₂ f
variable (p μ G)
theorem coeFn_zero : (0 : Lp.simpleFunc G p μ) =ᵐ[μ] (0 : α → G) :=
Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _
variable {p μ G}
variable [PartialOrder G]
theorem coeFn_nonneg (f : Lp.simpleFunc G p μ) : (0 : α → G) ≤ᵐ[μ] f ↔ 0 ≤ f := by
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Lp.coeFn_nonneg, AddSubmonoid.coe_zero]
theorem exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq {f : Lp.simpleFunc G p μ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDenseLp.lean | 703 | 729 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Notations
/-!
# Construction of homotopies for the Dold-Kan correspondence
(The general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan correspondence is explained
in `Equivalence.lean`.)
The purpose of the files `Homotopies.lean`, `Faces.lean`, `Projections.lean`
and `PInfty.lean` is to construct an idempotent endomorphism
`PInfty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` of the alternating face map complex
for each `X : SimplicialObject C` when `C` is a preadditive category.
In the case `C` is abelian, this `PInfty` shall be the projection on the
normalized Moore subcomplex of `K[X]` associated to the decomposition of the
complex `K[X]` as a direct sum of this normalized subcomplex and of the
degenerate subcomplex.
In `PInfty.lean`, this endomorphism `PInfty` shall be obtained by
passing to the limit idempotent endomorphisms `P q` for all `(q : ℕ)`.
These endomorphisms `P q` are defined by induction. The idea is to
start from the identity endomorphism `P 0` of `K[X]` and to ensure by
induction that the `q` higher face maps (except $d_0$) vanish on the
image of `P q`. Then, in a certain degree `n`, the image of `P q` for
a big enough `q` will be contained in the normalized subcomplex. This
construction is done in `Projections.lean`.
It would be easy to define the `P q` degreewise (similarly as it is done
in *Simplicial Homotopy Theory* by Goerrs-Jardine p. 149), but then we would
have to prove that they are compatible with the differential (i.e. they
are chain complex maps), and also that they are homotopic to the identity.
These two verifications are quite technical. In order to reduce the number
of such technical lemmas, the strategy that is followed here is to define
a series of null homotopic maps `Hσ q` (attached to families of maps `hσ`)
and use these in order to construct `P q` : the endomorphisms `P q`
shall basically be obtained by altering the identity endomorphism by adding
null homotopic maps, so that we get for free that they are morphisms
of chain complexes and that they are homotopic to the identity. The most
technical verifications that are needed about the null homotopic maps `Hσ`
are obtained in `Faces.lean`.
In this file `Homotopies.lean`, we define the null homotopic maps
`Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]`, show that they are natural (see `natTransHσ`) and
compatible the application of additive functors (see `map_Hσ`).
## References
* [Albrecht Dold, *Homology of Symmetric Products and Other Functors of Complexes*][dold1958]
* [Paul G. Goerss, John F. Jardine, *Simplicial Homotopy Theory*][goerss-jardine-2009]
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject Homotopy Opposite Simplicial DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable {X : SimplicialObject C}
/-- As we are using chain complexes indexed by `ℕ`, we shall need the relation
`c` such `c m n` if and only if `n+1=m`. -/
abbrev c :=
ComplexShape.down ℕ
/-- Helper when we need some `c.rel i j` (i.e. `ComplexShape.down ℕ`),
e.g. `c_mk n (n+1) rfl` -/
theorem c_mk (i j : ℕ) (h : j + 1 = i) : c.Rel i j :=
ComplexShape.down_mk i j h
/-- This lemma is meant to be used with `nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left` -/
theorem cs_down_0_not_rel_left (j : ℕ) : ¬c.Rel 0 j := by
intro hj
dsimp at hj
apply Nat.not_succ_le_zero j
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, hj]
/-- The sequence of maps which gives the null homotopic maps `Hσ` that shall be in
the inductive construction of the projections `P q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` -/
def hσ (q : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌ :=
if n < q then 0 else (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n - q) • X.σ ⟨n - q, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le _ _)⟩
/-- We can turn `hσ` into a datum that can be passed to `nullHomotopicMap'`. -/
def hσ' (q : ℕ) : ∀ n m, c.Rel m n → (K[X].X n ⟶ K[X].X m) := fun n m hnm =>
hσ q n ≫ eqToHom (by congr)
theorem hσ'_eq_zero {q n m : ℕ} (hnq : n < q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) = 0 := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
exact zero_comp
theorem hσ'_eq {q n a m : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) =
((-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩) ≫
eqToHom (by congr) := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
· omega
· have h' := tsub_eq_of_eq_add ha
congr
theorem hσ'_eq' {q n a : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) :
(hσ' q n (n + 1) rfl : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌) =
(-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩ := by
rw [hσ'_eq ha rfl, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
/-- The null homotopic map $(hσ q) ∘ d + d ∘ (hσ q)$ -/
def Hσ (q : ℕ) : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
nullHomotopicMap' (hσ' q)
/-- `Hσ` is null homotopic -/
def homotopyHσToZero (q : ℕ) : Homotopy (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]) 0 :=
nullHomotopy' (hσ' q)
/-- In degree `0`, the null homotopic map `Hσ` is zero. -/
theorem Hσ_eq_zero (q : ℕ) : (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]).f 0 = 0 := by
unfold Hσ
rw [nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left (c_mk 1 0 rfl) cs_down_0_not_rel_left]
rcases q with (_|q)
· rw [hσ'_eq (show 0 = 0 + 0 by rfl) (c_mk 1 0 rfl)]
simp only [pow_zero, Fin.mk_zero, one_zsmul, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
-- This `erw` is needed to show `0 + 1 = 1`.
erw [ChainComplex.of_d]
rw [AlternatingFaceMapComplex.objD, Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, pow_zero,
pow_one, one_smul, neg_smul, one_smul, comp_add, comp_neg, add_neg_eq_zero,
← Fin.castSucc_zero, ← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, δ_comp_σ_self, δ_comp_σ_succ]
· rw [hσ'_eq_zero (Nat.succ_pos q) (c_mk 1 0 rfl), zero_comp]
/-- The maps `hσ' q n m hnm` are natural on the simplicial object -/
| theorem hσ'_naturality (q : ℕ) (n m : ℕ) (hnm : c.Rel m n) {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op ⦋n⦌) ≫ hσ' q n m hnm = hσ' q n m hnm ≫ f.app (op ⦋m⦌) := by
have h : n + 1 = m := hnm
subst h
simp only [hσ', eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
unfold hσ
split_ifs
· rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]
· simp
/-- For each q, `Hσ q` is a natural transformation. -/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Homotopies.lean | 141 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
| simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 822 | 823 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Coprime elements of a ring or monoid
## Main definition
* `IsCoprime x y`: that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors (`IsRelPrime`) are not
necessarily coprime, e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime.
The two notions are equivalent in Bézout rings, see `isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime`.
This file also contains lemmas about `IsRelPrime` parallel to `IsCoprime`.
See also `RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas` for further development of coprime elements.
-/
universe u v
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (x y z : R)
/-- The proposition that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors are not necessarily coprime,
e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime. -/
def IsCoprime : Prop :=
∃ a b, a * x + b * y = 1
variable {x y z}
@[symm]
theorem IsCoprime.symm (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime y x :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H
⟨b, a, by rw [add_comm, H]⟩
theorem isCoprime_comm : IsCoprime x y ↔ IsCoprime y x :=
⟨IsCoprime.symm, IsCoprime.symm⟩
theorem isCoprime_self : IsCoprime x x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x (a + b) <| by rwa [mul_comm, add_mul], fun h =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h
⟨b, 0, by rwa [zero_mul, add_zero]⟩⟩
|
theorem isCoprime_zero_left : IsCoprime 0 x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, H⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x b <| by rwa [mul_zero, zero_add, mul_comm] at H, fun H =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 H
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Basic.lean | 56 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Round
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Floor Function for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the `FloorRing` instance on `ℚ`. Some technical lemmas relating `floor` to integer
division and modulo arithmetic are derived as well as some simple inequalities.
## Tags
rat, rationals, ℚ, floor
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Int
namespace Rat
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
protected theorem floor_def' (a : ℚ) : a.floor = a.num / a.den := by
rw [Rat.floor]
split
· next h => simp [h]
· next => rfl
protected theorem le_floor {z : ℤ} : ∀ {r : ℚ}, z ≤ Rat.floor r ↔ (z : ℚ) ≤ r
| | ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ => by
simp only [Rat.floor_def']
rw [mk'_eq_divInt]
have h' := Int.ofNat_lt.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)
conv =>
rhs
rw [intCast_eq_divInt, Rat.divInt_le_divInt zero_lt_one h', mul_one]
exact Int.le_ediv_iff_mul_le h'
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Floor.lean | 39 | 47 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiffMap
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.UniqueDifferential
/-!
# Diffeomorphisms
This file implements diffeomorphisms.
## Definitions
* `Diffeomorph I I' M M' n`: `n`-times continuously differentiable diffeomorphism between
`M` and `M'` with respect to I and I'; we do not introduce a separate definition for the case
`n = ∞`; we use notation instead.
* `Diffeomorph.toHomeomorph`: reinterpret a diffeomorphism as a homeomorphism.
* `ContinuousLinearEquiv.toDiffeomorph`: reinterpret a continuous equivalence as
a diffeomorphism.
* `ModelWithCorners.transDiffeomorph`: compose a given `ModelWithCorners` with a diffeomorphism
between the old and the new target spaces. Useful, e.g, to turn any finite dimensional manifold
into a manifold modelled on a Euclidean space.
* `Diffeomorph.toTransDiffeomorph`: the identity diffeomorphism between `M` with model `I` and `M`
with model `I.trans_diffeomorph e`.
This file also provides diffeomorphisms related to products and disjoint unions.
* `Diffeomorph.prodCongr`: the product of two diffeomorphisms
* `Diffeomorph.prodComm`: `M × N` is diffeomorphic to `N × M`
* `Diffeomorph.prodAssoc`: `(M × N) × N'` is diffeomorphic to `M × (N × N')`
* `Diffeomorph.sumCongr`: the disjoint union of two diffeomorphisms
* `Diffeomorph.sumComm`: `M ⊕ M'` is diffeomorphic to `M' × M`
* `Diffeomorph.sumAssoc`: `(M ⊕ N) ⊕ P` is diffeomorphic to `M ⊕ (N ⊕ P)`
* `Diffeomorph.sumEmpty`: `M ⊕ ∅` is diffeomorphic to `M`
## Notations
* `M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M'` := `Diffeomorph I J M N n`
* `M ≃ₘ⟮I, I'⟯ M'` := `Diffeomorph I J M N ∞`
* `E ≃ₘ^n[𝕜] E'` := `E ≃ₘ^n⟮𝓘(𝕜, E), 𝓘(𝕜, E')⟯ E'`
* `E ≃ₘ[𝕜] E'` := `E ≃ₘ⟮𝓘(𝕜, E), 𝓘(𝕜, E')⟯ E'`
## Implementation notes
This notion of diffeomorphism is needed although there is already a notion of structomorphism
because structomorphisms do not allow the model spaces `H` and `H'` of the two manifolds to be
different, i.e. for a structomorphism one has to impose `H = H'` which is often not the case in
practice.
## Keywords
diffeomorphism, manifold
-/
open scoped Manifold Topology ContDiff
open Function Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G'}
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M']
[ChartedSpace H' M'] {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N] {N' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N'] {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
section Defs
variable (I I' M M' n)
/-- `n`-times continuously differentiable diffeomorphism between `M` and `M'` with respect to `I`
and `I'`, denoted as `M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M'` (in the `Manifold` namespace). -/
structure Diffeomorph extends M ≃ M' where
protected contMDiff_toFun : ContMDiff I I' n toEquiv
protected contMDiff_invFun : ContMDiff I' I n toEquiv.symm
end Defs
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Manifold] notation M " ≃ₘ^" n:1000 "⟮" I ", " J "⟯ " N => Diffeomorph I J M N n
/-- Infinitely differentiable diffeomorphism between `M` and `M'` with respect to `I` and `I'`. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation M " ≃ₘ⟮" I ", " J "⟯ " N => Diffeomorph I J M N ∞
/-- `n`-times continuously differentiable diffeomorphism between `E` and `E'`. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation E " ≃ₘ^" n:1000 "[" 𝕜 "] " E' => Diffeomorph 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') E E' n
/-- Infinitely differentiable diffeomorphism between `E` and `E'`. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation3 E " ≃ₘ[" 𝕜 "] " E' => Diffeomorph 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') E E' ∞
namespace Diffeomorph
theorem toEquiv_injective : Injective (Diffeomorph.toEquiv : (M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') → M ≃ M')
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : EquivLike (M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') M M' where
coe Φ := Φ.toEquiv
inv Φ := Φ.toEquiv.symm
left_inv Φ := Φ.left_inv
right_inv Φ := Φ.right_inv
coe_injective' _ _ h _ := toEquiv_injective <| DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Interpret a diffeomorphism as a `ContMDiffMap`. -/
@[coe]
def toContMDiffMap (Φ : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : C^n⟮I, M; I', M'⟯ :=
⟨Φ, Φ.contMDiff_toFun⟩
instance : Coe (M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') C^n⟮I, M; I', M'⟯ :=
⟨toContMDiffMap⟩
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : Continuous h :=
h.contMDiff_toFun.continuous
protected theorem contMDiff (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : ContMDiff I I' n h :=
h.contMDiff_toFun
protected theorem contMDiffAt (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') {x} : ContMDiffAt I I' n h x :=
h.contMDiff.contMDiffAt
protected theorem contMDiffWithinAt (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') {s x} : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n h s x :=
h.contMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: should use `E ≃ₘ^n[𝕜] F` notation
protected theorem contDiff (h : E ≃ₘ^n⟮𝓘(𝕜, E), 𝓘(𝕜, E')⟯ E') : ContDiff 𝕜 n h :=
h.contMDiff.contDiff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth := Diffeomorph.contDiff
protected theorem mdifferentiable (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' h :=
h.contMDiff.mdifferentiable hn
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') (s : Set M) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' h s :=
(h.mdifferentiable hn).mdifferentiableOn
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEquiv (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : ⇑h.toEquiv = h :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_coe (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : ⇑(h : C^n⟮I, M; I', M'⟯) = h :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_inj {h h' : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M'} : h.toEquiv = h'.toEquiv ↔ h = h' :=
toEquiv_injective.eq_iff
/-- Coercion to function `fun h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M' ↦ (h : M → M')` is injective. -/
theorem coeFn_injective : Injective ((↑) : (M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') → (M → M')) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {h h' : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M'} (Heq : ∀ x, h x = h' x) : h = h' :=
coeFn_injective <| funext Heq
instance : ContinuousMapClass (M ≃ₘ⟮I, J⟯ N) M N where
map_continuous f := f.continuous
section
variable (M I n)
/-- Identity map as a diffeomorphism. -/
protected def refl : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I⟯ M where
contMDiff_toFun := contMDiff_id
contMDiff_invFun := contMDiff_id
toEquiv := Equiv.refl M
@[simp]
theorem refl_toEquiv : (Diffeomorph.refl I M n).toEquiv = Equiv.refl _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(Diffeomorph.refl I M n) = id :=
rfl
end
/-- Composition of two diffeomorphisms. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (h₁ : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') (h₂ : M' ≃ₘ^n⟮I', J⟯ N) : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N where
contMDiff_toFun := h₂.contMDiff.comp h₁.contMDiff
contMDiff_invFun := h₁.contMDiff_invFun.comp h₂.contMDiff_invFun
toEquiv := h₁.toEquiv.trans h₂.toEquiv
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : h.trans (Diffeomorph.refl I' M' n) = h :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') : (Diffeomorph.refl I M n).trans h = h :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (h₁ : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') (h₂ : M' ≃ₘ^n⟮I', J⟯ N) : ⇑(h₁.trans h₂) = h₂ ∘ h₁ :=
rfl
/-- Inverse of a diffeomorphism. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : N ≃ₘ^n⟮J, I⟯ M where
contMDiff_toFun := h.contMDiff_invFun
contMDiff_invFun := h.contMDiff_toFun
toEquiv := h.toEquiv.symm
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (x : N) : h (h.symm x) = x :=
h.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (x : M) : h.symm (h x) = x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp]
theorem symm_refl : (Diffeomorph.refl I M n).symm = Diffeomorph.refl I M n :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_trans_symm (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : h.trans h.symm = Diffeomorph.refl I M n :=
ext h.symm_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_self (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : h.symm.trans h = Diffeomorph.refl J N n :=
ext h.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans' (h₁ : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, I'⟯ M') (h₂ : M' ≃ₘ^n⟮I', J⟯ N) :
(h₁.trans h₂).symm = h₂.symm.trans h₁.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toEquiv (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : h.symm.toEquiv = h.toEquiv.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toEquiv_coe_symm (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : ⇑h.toEquiv.symm = h.symm :=
rfl
theorem image_eq_preimage (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (s : Set M) : h '' s = h.symm ⁻¹' s :=
h.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage s
theorem symm_image_eq_preimage (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (s : Set N) : h.symm '' s = h ⁻¹' s :=
h.symm.image_eq_preimage s
@[simp, mfld_simps]
nonrec theorem range_comp {α} (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (f : α → M) :
range (h ∘ f) = h.symm ⁻¹' range f := by
rw [range_comp, image_eq_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_symm_image (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (s : Set N) : h '' (h.symm '' s) = s :=
h.toEquiv.image_symm_image s
@[simp]
theorem symm_image_image (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) (s : Set M) : h.symm '' (h '' s) = s :=
h.toEquiv.symm_image_image s
/-- A diffeomorphism is a homeomorphism. -/
def toHomeomorph (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : M ≃ₜ N :=
⟨h.toEquiv, h.continuous, h.symm.continuous⟩
@[simp]
theorem toHomeomorph_toEquiv (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : h.toHomeomorph.toEquiv = h.toEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toHomeomorph (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : h.symm.toHomeomorph = h.toHomeomorph.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph = h :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph_symm (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph.symm = h.symm :=
rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_comp_diffeomorph_iff {m} (h : M ≃ₘ^n⟮I, J⟯ N) {f : N → M'} {s x}
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Diffeomorph.lean | 281 | 283 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, Complex.norm_real, norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hx, log_neg_eq_log,
Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
| Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 85 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Fabrizio Barroero. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fabrizio Barroero, Laura Capuano, Amos Turchet
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Matrix
import Mathlib.Data.Pi.Interval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Rify
/-!
# Siegel's Lemma
In this file we introduce and prove Siegel's Lemma in its most basic version. This is a fundamental
tool in diophantine approximation and transcendency and says that there exists a "small" integral
non-zero solution of a non-trivial underdetermined system of linear equations with integer
coefficients.
## Main results
- `exists_ne_zero_int_vec_norm_le`: Given a non-zero `m × n` matrix `A` with `m < n` the linear
system it determines has a non-zero integer solution `t` with
`‖t‖ ≤ ((n * ‖A‖) ^ ((m : ℝ) / (n - m)))`
## Notation
- `‖_‖ ` : Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup is the sup norm, the maximum of the absolute values of
the entries of the matrix
## References
See [M. Hindry and J. Silverman, Diophantine Geometry: an Introduction][hindrysilverman00].
-/
/- We set ‖⬝‖ to be Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup -/
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
open Matrix Finset
namespace Int.Matrix
variable {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (A : Matrix α β ℤ)
-- Some definitions and relative properties
local notation3 "m" => Fintype.card α
local notation3 "n" => Fintype.card β
local notation3 "e" => m / ((n : ℝ) - m) -- exponent
local notation3 "B" => Nat.floor (((n : ℝ) * max 1 ‖A‖) ^ e)
-- B' is the vector with all components = B
local notation3 "B'" => fun _ : β => (B : ℤ)
-- T is the box [0 B]^n
local notation3 "T" => Finset.Icc 0 B'
local notation3 "P" => fun i : α => ∑ j : β, B * posPart (A i j)
local notation3 "N" => fun i : α => ∑ j : β, B * (- negPart (A i j))
-- S is the box where the image of T goes
local notation3 "S" => Finset.Icc N P
section preparation
/- In order to apply Pigeonhole we need:
# Step 1: ∀ v ∈ T, A *ᵥ v ∈ S
and
# Step 2: #S < #T
Pigeonhole will give different x and y in T with A.mulVec x = A.mulVec y in S
Their difference is the solution we are looking for
-/
-- # Step 1: ∀ v ∈ T, A *ᵥ v ∈ S
private lemma image_T_subset_S [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (v) (hv : v ∈ T) : A *ᵥ v ∈ S := by
rw [mem_Icc] at hv ⊢
have mulVec_def : A.mulVec v =
fun i ↦ Finset.sum univ fun j : β ↦ A i j * v j := rfl
rw [mulVec_def]
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ?_, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
all_goals
simp only [mul_neg]
gcongr ∑ _ : α, ?_ with j _ -- Get rid of sums
rw [← mul_comm (v j)] -- Move A i j to the right of the products
rcases le_total 0 (A i j) with hsign | hsign-- We have to distinguish cases: we have now 4 goals
· rw [negPart_eq_zero.2 hsign]
exact mul_nonneg (hv.1 j) hsign
· rw [negPart_eq_neg.2 hsign]
simp only [mul_neg, neg_neg]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right (hv.2 j) hsign
· rw [posPart_eq_self.2 hsign]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hv.2 j) hsign
· rw [posPart_eq_zero.2 hsign]
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hv.1 j) hsign
-- # Preparation for Step 2
private lemma card_T_eq [DecidableEq β] : #T = (B + 1) ^ n := by
rw [Pi.card_Icc 0 B']
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, card_Icc, sub_zero, toNat_natCast_add_one, prod_const, card_univ,
| add_pos_iff, zero_lt_one, or_true]
-- This lemma is necessary to be able to apply the formula #(Icc a b) = b + 1 - a
private lemma N_le_P_add_one (i : α) : N i ≤ P i + 1 := by
calc N i
_ ≤ 0 := by
apply Finset.sum_nonpos
intro j _
simp only [mul_neg, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg B) (negPart_nonneg (A i j))
_ ≤ P i + 1 := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SiegelsLemma.lean | 96 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Frobenius
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Expand a polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.expand R p f`: expand the polynomial `f` with coefficients in a
commutative semiring `R` by a factor of p, so `expand R p (∑ aₙ xⁿ)` is `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
* `Polynomial.contract p f`: the opposite of `expand`, so it sends `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ` to `∑ aₙ xⁿ`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
/-- Expand the polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, map_smul, map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [map_mul, expand_C, map_pow, expand_X, map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [map_mul, expand_C, map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
/-- Expansion is injective. -/
theorem expand_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : Function.Injective (expand R n) := fun g g' H =>
ext fun k => by rw [← coeff_expand_mul hn, H, coeff_expand_mul hn]
theorem expand_inj {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f g : R[X]} : expand R p f = expand R p g ↔ f = g :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff
theorem expand_eq_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff' (map_zero _)
theorem expand_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
(expand_eq_zero hp).not
theorem expand_eq_C {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} {r : R} : expand R p f = C r ↔ f = C r := by
rw [← expand_C, expand_inj hp, expand_C]
theorem natDegree_expand (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : (expand R p f).natDegree = f.natDegree * p := by
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with hp | hp
· rw [hp, coe_expand, pow_zero, mul_zero, ← C_1, eval₂_hom, natDegree_C]
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, map_zero, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
have hf1 : expand R p f ≠ 0 := mt (expand_eq_zero hp).1 hf
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree hf1]
refine le_antisymm ((degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun n hn => ?_) ?_
· rw [coeff_expand hp]
split_ifs with hpn
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
contrapose! hn
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hpn]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right p hn
· rfl
· refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_expand_mul hp, ← leadingCoeff]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hf
theorem leadingCoeff_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) :
(expand R p f).leadingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
simp_rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_expand, coeff_expand_mul hp]
theorem monic_expand_iff {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) : (expand R p f).Monic ↔ f.Monic := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff_expand hp]
alias ⟨_, Monic.expand⟩ := monic_expand_iff
theorem map_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R →+* S} {q : R[X]} :
map f (expand R p q) = expand S p (map f q) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
ext
rw [coeff_map, coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp), coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp)]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem expand_eval (p : ℕ) (P : R[X]) (r : R) : eval r (expand R p P) = eval (r ^ p) P := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on P (fun a => by simp) (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n a _ => by simp
rw [map_add, eval_add, eval_add, hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem expand_aeval {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (p : ℕ) (P : R[X]) (r : A) :
aeval r (expand R p P) = aeval (r ^ p) P := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on P (fun a => by simp) (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n a _ => by simp
rw [map_add, aeval_add, aeval_add, hf, hg]
/-- The opposite of `expand`: sends `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ` to `∑ aₙ xⁿ`. -/
noncomputable def contract (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ n ∈ range (f.natDegree + 1), monomial n (f.coeff (n * p))
theorem coeff_contract {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(contract p f).coeff n = f.coeff (n * p) := by
simp only [contract, coeff_monomial, sum_ite_eq', finset_sum_coeff, mem_range, not_lt,
ite_eq_left_iff]
intro hn
apply (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt _).symm
calc
f.natDegree < f.natDegree + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
_ ≤ n * 1 := by simpa only [mul_one] using hn
_ ≤ n * p := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (show 1 ≤ p from hp.bot_lt) (zero_le n)
theorem map_contract {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) {f : R →+* S} {q : R[X]} :
(q.contract p).map f = (q.map f).contract p := ext fun n ↦ by
simp only [coeff_map, coeff_contract hp]
theorem contract_expand {f : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : contract p (expand R p f) = f := by
ext
simp [coeff_contract hp, coeff_expand hp.bot_lt, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.bot_lt]
theorem contract_one {f : R[X]} : contract 1 f = f :=
ext fun n ↦ by rw [coeff_contract one_ne_zero, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem contract_C (r : R) : contract p (C r) = C r := by simp [contract]
theorem contract_add {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f g : R[X]) :
contract p (f + g) = contract p f + contract p g := by
ext; simp_rw [coeff_add, coeff_contract hp, coeff_add]
theorem contract_mul_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f g : R[X]) :
contract p (f * expand R p g) = contract p f * g := by
ext n
rw [coeff_contract hp, coeff_mul, coeff_mul, ← sum_subset
(s₁ := (antidiagonal n).image fun x ↦ (x.1 * p, x.2 * p)), sum_image]
· simp_rw [coeff_expand_mul hp.bot_lt, coeff_contract hp]
· intro x hx y hy eq; simpa only [Prod.ext_iff, Nat.mul_right_cancel_iff hp.bot_lt] using eq
· simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_image, mem_antidiagonal]; rintro _ ⟨x, rfl, rfl⟩; simp_rw [add_mul]
simp_rw [mem_image, mem_antidiagonal]
intro ⟨x, y⟩ eq nex
by_cases h : p ∣ y
· obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ : p ∣ x := (Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h).mpr (eq ▸ dvd_mul_left p n)
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h
refine (nex ⟨⟨x, y⟩, (Nat.mul_right_cancel_iff hp.bot_lt).mp ?_, by simp_rw [mul_comm]⟩).elim
rw [← eq, mul_comm, mul_add]
· rw [coeff_expand hp.bot_lt, if_neg h, mul_zero]
@[simp] theorem isCoprime_expand {f g : R[X]} {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
IsCoprime (expand R p f) (expand R p g) ↔ IsCoprime f g :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, eq⟩ ↦ ⟨contract p a, contract p b, by
simp_rw [← contract_mul_expand hp, ← contract_add hp, eq, ← C_1, contract_C]⟩, (·.map _)⟩
section ExpChar
theorem expand_contract [CharP R p] [NoZeroDivisors R] {f : R[X]} (hf : Polynomial.derivative f = 0)
(hp : p ≠ 0) : expand R p (contract p f) = f := by
ext n
rw [coeff_expand hp.bot_lt, coeff_contract hp]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
· rcases n with - | n
· exact absurd (dvd_zero p) h
have := coeff_derivative f n
rw [hf, coeff_zero, zero_eq_mul] at this
rcases this with h' | _
· rw [h']
rename_i _ _ _ h'
rw [← Nat.cast_succ, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p] at h'
exact absurd h' h
variable [ExpChar R p]
theorem expand_contract' [NoZeroDivisors R] {f : R[X]} (hf : Polynomial.derivative f = 0) :
expand R p (contract p f) = f := by
obtain _ | @⟨_, hprime, hchar⟩ := ‹ExpChar R p›
· rw [expand_one, contract_one]
· haveI := Fact.mk hchar; exact expand_contract p hf hprime.ne_zero
theorem expand_char (f : R[X]) : map (frobenius R p) (expand R p f) = f ^ p := by
refine f.induction_on' (fun a b ha hb => ?_) fun n a => ?_
· rw [map_add, Polynomial.map_add, ha, hb, add_pow_expChar]
· rw [expand_monomial, map_monomial, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial,
mul_pow, ← C.map_pow, frobenius_def]
ring
theorem map_expand_pow_char (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
map (frobenius R p ^ n) (expand R (p ^ n) f) = f ^ p ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [RingHom.one_def]
| succ _ n_ih =>
symm
rw [pow_succ, pow_mul, ← n_ih, ← expand_char, pow_succ', RingHom.mul_def, ← map_map, mul_comm,
expand_mul, ← map_expand]
end ExpChar
end CommSemiring
section rootMultiplicity
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {p n : ℕ} [ExpChar R p] {f : R[X]} {r : R}
theorem rootMultiplicity_expand_pow :
(expand R (p ^ n) f).rootMultiplicity r = p ^ n * f.rootMultiplicity (r ^ p ^ n) := by
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne f 0; · simp
obtain ⟨g, hg, ndvd⟩ := f.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h0 (r ^ p ^ n)
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, ← eval_X (x := r), ← eval_pow, ← isRoot_comp, ← expand_eq_comp_X_pow] at ndvd
conv_lhs => rw [hg, map_mul, map_pow, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C, map_pow, ← sub_pow_expChar_pow,
← pow_mul, mul_comm, rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow (expand_ne_zero (expChar_pow_pos R p n)
|>.mpr <| right_ne_zero_of_mul <| hg ▸ h0), rootMultiplicity_eq_zero ndvd, zero_add]
theorem rootMultiplicity_expand :
(expand R p f).rootMultiplicity r = p * f.rootMultiplicity (r ^ p) := by
rw [← pow_one p, rootMultiplicity_expand_pow]
end rootMultiplicity
section IsDomain
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem isLocalHom_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : IsLocalHom (expand R p) := by
refine ⟨fun f hf1 => ?_⟩
have hf2 := eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit hf1)
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_zero _), p.zero_div] at hf2
rw [hf2, isUnit_C] at hf1; rw [expand_eq_C hp] at hf2; rwa [hf2, isUnit_C]
variable {R}
theorem of_irreducible_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) {f : R[X]} (hf : Irreducible (expand R p f)) :
Irreducible f :=
let _ := isLocalHom_expand R hp.bot_lt
hf.of_map
theorem of_irreducible_expand_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) {f : R[X]} {n : ℕ} :
Irreducible (expand R (p ^ n) f) → Irreducible f :=
Nat.recOn n (fun hf => by rwa [pow_zero, expand_one] at hf) fun n ih hf =>
ih <| of_irreducible_expand hp <| by
rw [pow_succ'] at hf
rwa [expand_expand]
end IsDomain
| end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 323 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.CoreAttrs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
For the proof that the factorial of `n` counts the permutations of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_perm`.
## Main declarations
* `Nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `Nat.ascFactorial`: The ascending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from `n` to
`n + k - 1`.
* `Nat.descFactorial`: The descending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from
`n - k + 1` to `n`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
/-- factorial notation `(n)!` for `Nat.factorial n`.
In Lean, names can end with exclamation marks (e.g. `List.get!`), so you cannot write
`n!` in Lean, but must write `(n)!` or `n !` instead. The former is preferred, since
Lean can confuse the `!` in `n !` as the (prefix) boolean negation operation in some
cases.
For numerals the parentheses are not required, so e.g. `0!` or `1!` work fine.
Todo: replace occurrences of `n !` with `(n)!` in Mathlib. -/
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : n ≠ 0) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn) ▸ rfl
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by
induction h with
| refl => exact Nat.dvd_refl _
| step _ ih => exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n !
| succ _, _, _, h => Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ≤ n ! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
theorem factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ! * (m + 1) ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n + 1 => by
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1), Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial (succ_le_succ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n ! < m ! ↔ n < m := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_le.mp fun hmn => Nat.not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), fun h => ?_⟩
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n ! < (n + 1)! := by
intro k hk
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos]
exact Nat.mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos
induction h generalizing hn with
| refl => exact this hn
| step hnk ih => exact lt_trans (ih hn) <| this <| lt_trans hn <| lt_of_succ_le hnk
@[gcongr]
lemma factorial_lt_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : n < m) : n ! < m ! := (factorial_lt hn).mpr h
@[simp] lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n ! ↔ 1 < n := factorial_lt Nat.one_pos
@[simp]
theorem factorial_eq_one : n ! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h]
apply lt_irrefl
· rintro (_|_|_) <;> rfl
theorem factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m
· rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
· rfl
rw [← one_lt_factorial, h, one_lt_factorial] at hn
rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
theorem factorial_inj' (h : 1 < n ∨ 1 < m) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
obtain hn|hm := h
· exact factorial_inj hn
· rw [eq_comm, factorial_inj hm, eq_comm]
theorem self_le_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≤ n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| k + 1 => Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.one_le_of_lt k.factorial_pos)
theorem lt_factorial_self {n : ℕ} (hi : 3 ≤ n) : n < n ! := by
have : 0 < n := by omega
have hn : 1 < pred n := le_pred_of_lt (succ_le_iff.mp hi)
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos ‹0 < n›, factorial_succ]
exact (Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right (pred n).succ_pos).2
((Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn (self_le_factorial _)))
theorem add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ {i : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
i + (n + 1)! < (i + n + 1)! := by
rw [factorial_succ (i + _), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
have := (i + n).self_le_factorial
refine Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right ?_).2 ?_))
(factorial_le ?_) <;> omega
theorem add_factorial_lt_factorial_add {i n : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n ! < (i + n)! := by
cases hn
· rw [factorial_one]
exact lt_factorial_self (succ_le_succ hi)
exact add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ _ hi
theorem add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ (i : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
i + (n + 1)! ≤ (i + (n + 1))! := by
cases (le_or_lt (2 : ℕ) i)
· rw [← Nat.add_assoc]
apply Nat.le_of_lt
apply add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ
assumption
· match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 =>
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ (1 + n), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_comm 1 n,
Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
exact Nat.mul_pos n.succ_pos n.succ.factorial_pos
| succ (succ n) => contradiction
|
theorem add_factorial_le_factorial_add (i : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : i + n ! ≤ (i + n)! := by
rcases n1 with - | @h
· exact self_le_factorial _
exact add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ i h
theorem factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : n ! * n ^ (m - n) ≤ m ! := by
calc
_ ≤ n ! * (n + 1) ^ (m - n) := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ ≤ _ := by simpa [hnm] using @Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial n (m - n)
lemma factorial_le_pow : ∀ n, n ! ≤ n ^ n
| 0 => le_refl _
| n + 1 =>
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 166 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
|
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 246 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# Conversion between `Cardinal` and `ℕ∞`
In this file we define a coercion `Cardinal.ofENat : ℕ∞ → Cardinal`
and a projection `Cardinal.toENat : Cardinal →+*o ℕ∞`.
We also prove basic theorems about these definitions.
## Implementation notes
We define `Cardinal.ofENat` as a function instead of a bundled homomorphism
so that we can use it as a coercion and delaborate its application to `↑n`.
We define `Cardinal.toENat` as a bundled homomorphism
so that we can use all the theorems about homomorphisms without specializing them to this function.
Since it is not registered as a coercion, the argument about delaboration does not apply.
## Keywords
set theory, cardinals, extended natural numbers
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Set
universe u v
namespace Cardinal
/-- Coercion `ℕ∞ → Cardinal`. It sends natural numbers to natural numbers and `⊤` to `ℵ₀`.
See also `Cardinal.ofENatHom` for a bundled homomorphism version. -/
@[coe] def ofENat : ℕ∞ → Cardinal
| (n : ℕ) => n
| ⊤ => ℵ₀
instance : Coe ENat Cardinal := ⟨Cardinal.ofENat⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ℵ₀ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_nat (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) : Cardinal) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
lemma ofENat_strictMono : StrictMono ofENat :=
WithTop.strictMono_iff.2 ⟨Nat.strictMono_cast, nat_lt_aleph0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_ofENat {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
ofENat_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr, mono] alias ⟨_, ofENat_lt_ofENat_of_lt⟩ := ofENat_lt_ofENat
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_aleph0 {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < ℵ₀ ↔ m < ⊤ :=
| ofENat_lt_ofENat (n := ⊤)
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ENat.lean | 67 | 67 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Structures
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.BumpFunction
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PartitionOfUnity
import Mathlib.Topology.ShrinkingLemma
/-!
# Smooth partition of unity
In this file we define two structures, `SmoothBumpCovering` and `SmoothPartitionOfUnity`. Both
structures describe coverings of a set by a locally finite family of supports of smooth functions
with some additional properties. The former structure is mostly useful as an intermediate step in
the construction of a smooth partition of unity but some proofs that traditionally deal with a
partition of unity can use a `SmoothBumpCovering` as well.
Given a real manifold `M` and its subset `s`, a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is a collection of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s `f i` indexed by `i : ι` such that
* the center of each `f i` belongs to `s`;
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, there exists `i : ι` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`.
In the same settings, a `SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s` is a collection of smooth nonnegative
functions `f i : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯`, `i : ι`, such that
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for each `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one.
We say that `f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → Set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
We prove that on a smooth finitely dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology,
for any `U : M → Set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a similar statement about smooth partitions of
unity, see `SmoothPartitionOfUnity.exists_isSubordinate`.
Finally, we use existence of a partition of unity to prove lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` that allows us to construct a globally defined smooth
function from local functions.
## TODO
* Build a framework for to transfer local definitions to global using partition of unity and use it
to define, e.g., the integral of a differential form over a manifold. Lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` is a first step in this direction.
## Tags
smooth bump function, partition of unity
-/
universe uι uE uH uM uF
open Function Filter Module Set
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type uι} {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {H : Type uH}
[TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H) {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M]
/-!
### Covering by supports of smooth bump functions
In this section we define `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` to be a collection of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s such that their supports is a locally finite family of sets and for each
`x ∈ s` some function `f i` from the collection is equal to `1` in a neighborhood of `x`. A covering
of this type is useful to construct a smooth partition of unity and can be used instead of a
partition of unity in some proofs.
We prove that on a smooth finite dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology, for
any `U : M → Set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. -/
variable (ι M)
/-- We say that a collection of `SmoothBumpFunction`s is a `SmoothBumpCovering` of a set `s` if
* `(f i).c ∈ s` for all `i`;
* the family `fun i ↦ support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each point `x ∈ s` there exists `i` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`;
in other words, `x` belongs to the interior of `{y | f i y = 1}`;
If `M` is a finite dimensional real manifold which is a `σ`-compact Hausdorff topological space,
then for every covering `U : M → Set M`, `∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x`, there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering`
subordinate to `U`, see `SmoothBumpCovering.exists_isSubordinate`.
This covering can be used, e.g., to construct a partition of unity and to prove the weak
Whitney embedding theorem. -/
structure SmoothBumpCovering [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (s : Set M := univ) where
/-- The center point of each bump in the smooth covering. -/
c : ι → M
/-- A smooth bump function around `c i`. -/
toFun : ∀ i, SmoothBumpFunction I (c i)
/-- All the bump functions in the covering are centered at points in `s`. -/
c_mem' : ∀ i, c i ∈ s
/-- Around each point, there are only finitely many nonzero bump functions in the family. -/
locallyFinite' : LocallyFinite fun i => support (toFun i)
/-- Around each point in `s`, one of the bump functions is equal to `1`. -/
eventuallyEq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, toFun i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1
/-- We say that a collection of functions form a smooth partition of unity on a set `s` if
* all functions are infinitely smooth and nonnegative;
* the family `fun i ↦ support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for all `x ∈ s` the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for all `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one. -/
structure SmoothPartitionOfUnity (s : Set M := univ) where
/-- The family of functions forming the partition of unity. -/
toFun : ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯
/-- Around each point, there are only finitely many nonzero functions in the family. -/
locallyFinite' : LocallyFinite fun i => support (toFun i)
/-- All the functions in the partition of unity are nonnegative. -/
nonneg' : ∀ i x, 0 ≤ toFun i x
/-- The functions in the partition of unity add up to `1` at any point of `s`. -/
sum_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∑ᶠ i, toFun i x = 1
/-- The functions in the partition of unity add up to at most `1` everywhere. -/
sum_le_one' : ∀ x, ∑ᶠ i, toFun i x ≤ 1
variable {ι I M}
namespace SmoothPartitionOfUnity
variable {s : Set M} (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) {n : ℕ∞}
instance {s : Set M} : FunLike (SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) ι C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
protected theorem locallyFinite : LocallyFinite fun i => support (f i) :=
f.locallyFinite'
theorem nonneg (i : ι) (x : M) : 0 ≤ f i x :=
f.nonneg' i x
theorem sum_eq_one {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x = 1 :=
f.sum_eq_one' x hx
theorem exists_pos_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ i, 0 < f i x := by
by_contra! h
have H : ∀ i, f i x = 0 := fun i ↦ le_antisymm (h i) (f.nonneg i x)
have := f.sum_eq_one hx
simp_rw [H] at this
simpa
theorem sum_le_one (x : M) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x ≤ 1 :=
f.sum_le_one' x
/-- Reinterpret a smooth partition of unity as a continuous partition of unity. -/
@[simps]
def toPartitionOfUnity : PartitionOfUnity ι M s :=
{ f with toFun := fun i => f i }
theorem contMDiff_sum : ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x :=
contMDiff_finsum (fun i => (f i).contMDiff) f.locallyFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_sum := contMDiff_sum
theorem le_one (i : ι) (x : M) : f i x ≤ 1 :=
f.toPartitionOfUnity.le_one i x
theorem sum_nonneg (x : M) : 0 ≤ ∑ᶠ i, f i x :=
f.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_nonneg x
theorem finsum_smul_mem_convex {g : ι → M → F} {t : Set F} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hg : ∀ i, f i x ≠ 0 → g i x ∈ t) (ht : Convex ℝ t) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x ∈ t :=
ht.finsum_mem (fun _ => f.nonneg _ _) (f.sum_eq_one hx) hg
theorem contMDiff_smul {g : M → F} {i} (hg : ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n g x) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => f i x • g x :=
contMDiff_of_tsupport fun x hx =>
((f i).contMDiff.contMDiffAt.of_le (mod_cast le_top)).smul <| hg x
<| tsupport_smul_subset_left _ _ hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_smul := contMDiff_smul
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : Set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of
functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth at every point of the topological support of `f i`, then
the sum `fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
theorem contMDiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F}
(hg : ∀ (i), ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) x) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x :=
(contMDiff_finsum fun i => f.contMDiff_smul (hg i)) <|
f.locallyFinite.subset fun _ => support_smul_subset_left _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_finsum_smul := contMDiff_finsum_smul
theorem contMDiffAt_finsum {x₀ : M} {g : ι → M → F}
(hφ : ∀ i, x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i) → ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) x₀ := by
refine _root_.contMDiffAt_finsum (f.locallyFinite.smul_left _) fun i ↦ ?_
by_cases hx : x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i)
· exact ContMDiffAt.smul ((f i).contMDiff.of_le (mod_cast le_top)).contMDiffAt (hφ i hx)
· exact contMDiffAt_of_not_mem (compl_subset_compl.mpr
(tsupport_smul_subset_left (f i) (g i)) hx) n
theorem contDiffAt_finsum {s : Set E} (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι 𝓘(ℝ, E) E s) {x₀ : E}
{g : ι → E → F} (hφ : ∀ i, x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i) → ContDiffAt ℝ n (g i) x₀) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) x₀ := by
simp only [← contMDiffAt_iff_contDiffAt] at *
exact f.contMDiffAt_finsum hφ
section finsupport
variable {s : Set M} (ρ : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (x₀ : M)
/-- The support of a smooth partition of unity at a point `x₀` as a `Finset`.
This is the set of `i : ι` such that `x₀ ∈ support f i`, i.e. `f i ≠ x₀`. -/
def finsupport : Finset ι := ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finsupport x₀
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsupport {i : ι} : i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀ ↔ i ∈ support fun i ↦ ρ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.mem_finsupport x₀
@[simp]
theorem coe_finsupport : (ρ.finsupport x₀ : Set ι) = support fun i ↦ ρ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.coe_finsupport x₀
theorem sum_finsupport (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) : ∑ i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀, ρ i x₀ = 1 :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport hx₀
theorem sum_finsupport' (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) {I : Finset ι} (hI : ρ.finsupport x₀ ⊆ I) :
∑ i ∈ I, ρ i x₀ = 1 :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport' hx₀ hI
theorem sum_finsupport_smul_eq_finsum {A : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [Module ℝ A] (φ : ι → M → A) :
∑ i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀, ρ i x₀ • φ i x₀ = ∑ᶠ i, ρ i x₀ • φ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport_smul_eq_finsum φ
end finsupport
section fintsupport -- smooth partitions of unity have locally finite `tsupport`
variable {s : Set M} (ρ : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (x₀ : M)
/-- The `tsupport`s of a smooth partition of unity are locally finite. -/
theorem finite_tsupport : {i | x₀ ∈ tsupport (ρ i)}.Finite :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finite_tsupport _
/-- The tsupport of a partition of unity at a point `x₀` as a `Finset`.
This is the set of `i : ι` such that `x₀ ∈ tsupport f i`. -/
def fintsupport (x : M) : Finset ι :=
(ρ.finite_tsupport x).toFinset
theorem mem_fintsupport_iff (i : ι) : i ∈ ρ.fintsupport x₀ ↔ x₀ ∈ tsupport (ρ i) :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
theorem eventually_fintsupport_subset : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x₀, ρ.fintsupport y ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.eventually_fintsupport_subset _
theorem finsupport_subset_fintsupport : ρ.finsupport x₀ ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finsupport_subset_fintsupport x₀
theorem eventually_finsupport_subset : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x₀, ρ.finsupport y ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.eventually_finsupport_subset x₀
end fintsupport
section IsSubordinate
/-- A smooth partition of unity `f i` is subordinate to a family of sets `U i` indexed by the same
type if for each `i` the closure of the support of `f i` is a subset of `U i`. -/
def IsSubordinate (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (U : ι → Set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U i
variable {f}
variable {U : ι → Set M}
@[simp]
theorem isSubordinate_toPartitionOfUnity :
f.toPartitionOfUnity.IsSubordinate U ↔ f.IsSubordinate U :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsSubordinate.toPartitionOfUnity⟩ := isSubordinate_toPartitionOfUnity
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : Set M` subordinate to a family of open sets
`U : ι → Set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth on
`U i`, then the sum `fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is $C^n$ smooth on the whole manifold. -/
theorem IsSubordinate.contMDiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F} (hf : f.IsSubordinate U)
(ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hg : ∀ i, ContMDiffOn I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) (U i)) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x :=
f.contMDiff_finsum_smul fun i _ hx => (hg i).contMDiffAt <| (ho i).mem_nhds (hf i hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")]
alias IsSubordinate.smooth_finsum_smul := IsSubordinate.contMDiff_finsum_smul
end IsSubordinate
end SmoothPartitionOfUnity
namespace BumpCovering
-- Repeat variables to drop `[FiniteDimensional ℝ E]` and `[IsManifold I ∞ M]`
theorem contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {M : Type uM}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {s : Set M} (f : BumpCovering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) (i : ι) : ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f.toPartitionOfUnity i) :=
(hf i).mul <| (contMDiff_finprod_cond fun j _ => contMDiff_const.sub (hf j)) <| by
simp only [Pi.sub_def, mulSupport_one_sub]
exact f.locallyFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")]
alias smooth_toPartitionOfUnity := contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity
variable {s : Set M}
/-- A `BumpCovering` such that all functions in this covering are smooth generates a smooth
partition of unity.
In our formalization, not every `f : BumpCovering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a
`SmoothBumpCovering`; instead, a `SmoothBumpCovering` is a covering by supports of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s. So, we define `BumpCovering.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity`, then reuse it
in `SmoothBumpCovering.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity`. -/
def toSmoothPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s :=
{ f.toPartitionOfUnity with
toFun := fun i => ⟨f.toPartitionOfUnity i, f.contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity hf i⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_toPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf).toPartitionOfUnity = f.toPartitionOfUnity :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSmoothPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i))
(i : ι) : ⇑(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf i) = f.toPartitionOfUnity i :=
rfl
theorem IsSubordinate.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity {f : BumpCovering ι M s} {U : ι → Set M}
(h : f.IsSubordinate U) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf).IsSubordinate U :=
h.toPartitionOfUnity
end BumpCovering
namespace SmoothBumpCovering
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {s : Set M} {U : M → Set M} (fs : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s)
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s) fun x => ∀ i : ι, SmoothBumpFunction I (x.c i) :=
⟨toFun⟩
/--
We say that `f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → Set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
-/
def IsSubordinate {s : Set M} (f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s) (U : M → Set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f.c i)
theorem IsSubordinate.support_subset {fs : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s} {U : M → Set M}
(h : fs.IsSubordinate U) (i : ι) : support (fs i) ⊆ U (fs.c i) :=
Subset.trans subset_closure (h i)
variable (I) in
/-- Let `M` be a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional real vector space.
Suppose also that `M` is a Hausdorff `σ`-compact topological space. Let `s` be a closed set
in `M` and `U : M → Set M` be a collection of sets such that `U x ∈ 𝓝 x` for every `x ∈ s`.
Then there exists a smooth bump covering of `s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
theorem exists_isSubordinate [T2Space M] [SigmaCompactSpace M] (hs : IsClosed s)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ (ι : Type uM) (f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s), f.IsSubordinate U := by
-- First we deduce some missing instances
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace H := I.locallyCompactSpace
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace M := ChartedSpace.locallyCompactSpace H M
-- Next we choose a covering by supports of smooth bump functions
have hB := fun x hx => SmoothBumpFunction.nhds_basis_support (I := I) (hU x hx)
rcases refinement_of_locallyCompact_sigmaCompact_of_nhds_basis_set hs hB with
⟨ι, c, f, hf, hsub', hfin⟩
choose hcs hfU using hf
-- Then we use the shrinking lemma to get a covering by smaller open
rcases exists_subset_iUnion_closed_subset hs (fun i => (f i).isOpen_support)
(fun x _ => hfin.point_finite x) hsub' with ⟨V, hsV, hVc, hVf⟩
choose r hrR hr using fun i => (f i).exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball (hVc i) (hVf i)
refine ⟨ι, ⟨c, fun i => (f i).updateRIn (r i) (hrR i), hcs, ?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩, fun i => ?_⟩
· simpa only [SmoothBumpFunction.support_updateRIn]
· refine (mem_iUnion.1 <| hsV hx).imp fun i hi => ?_
exact ((f i).updateRIn _ _).eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt
((f i).support_subset_source <| hVf _ hi) (hr i hi).2
· simpa only [SmoothBumpFunction.support_updateRIn, tsupport] using hfU i
protected theorem locallyFinite : LocallyFinite fun i => support (fs i) :=
fs.locallyFinite'
protected theorem point_finite (x : M) : {i | fs i x ≠ 0}.Finite :=
fs.locallyFinite.point_finite x
/-- Index of a bump function such that `fs i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`. -/
def ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : ι :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one' x hx).choose
theorem eventuallyEq_one (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one' x hx).choose_spec
theorem apply_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) x = 1 :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one x hx).eq_of_nhds
theorem mem_support_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ support (fs <| fs.ind x hx) := by
simp [fs.apply_ind x hx]
theorem mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (chartAt H (fs.c i)).source :=
(fs i).support_subset_source <| by simp [h]
theorem mem_extChartAt_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (extChartAt I (fs.c i)).source := by
rw [extChartAt_source]; exact fs.mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one h
theorem mem_chartAt_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ (chartAt H (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
theorem mem_extChartAt_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (extChartAt I (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_extChartAt_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
/-- The index type of a `SmoothBumpCovering` of a compact manifold is finite. -/
protected def fintype [CompactSpace M] : Fintype ι :=
fs.locallyFinite.fintypeOfCompact fun i => (fs i).nonempty_support
variable [T2Space M]
variable [IsManifold I ∞ M]
/-- Reinterpret a `SmoothBumpCovering` as a continuous `BumpCovering`. Note that not every
`f : BumpCovering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a `SmoothBumpCovering`. -/
def toBumpCovering : BumpCovering ι M s where
toFun i := ⟨fs i, (fs i).continuous⟩
locallyFinite' := fs.locallyFinite
nonneg' i _ := (fs i).nonneg
le_one' i _ := (fs i).le_one
eventuallyEq_one' := fs.eventuallyEq_one'
@[simp]
theorem isSubordinate_toBumpCovering {f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s} {U : M → Set M} :
(f.toBumpCovering.IsSubordinate fun i => U (f.c i)) ↔ f.IsSubordinate U :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsSubordinate.toBumpCovering⟩ := isSubordinate_toBumpCovering
/-- Every `SmoothBumpCovering` defines a smooth partition of unity. -/
def toSmoothPartitionOfUnity : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s :=
fs.toBumpCovering.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity fun i => (fs i).contMDiff
theorem toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_apply (i : ι) (x : M) :
fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i x = fs i x * ∏ᶠ (j) (_ : WellOrderingRel j i), (1 - fs j x) :=
rfl
open Classical in
theorem toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_eq_mul_prod (i : ι) (x : M) (t : Finset ι)
(ht : ∀ j, WellOrderingRel j i → fs j x ≠ 0 → j ∈ t) :
fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i x = fs i x * ∏ j ∈ t with WellOrderingRel j i, (1 - fs j x) :=
fs.toBumpCovering.toPartitionOfUnity_eq_mul_prod i x t ht
open Classical in
theorem exists_finset_toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_eventuallyEq (i : ι) (x : M) :
∃ t : Finset ι,
fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i =ᶠ[𝓝 x]
fs i * ∏ j ∈ t with WellOrderingRel j i, ((1 : M → ℝ) - fs j) := by
-- Porting note: was defeq, now the continuous lemma uses bundled homs
simpa using fs.toBumpCovering.exists_finset_toPartitionOfUnity_eventuallyEq i x
theorem toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_zero_of_zero {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 0) :
fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i x = 0 :=
fs.toBumpCovering.toPartitionOfUnity_zero_of_zero h
theorem support_toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_subset (i : ι) :
support (fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i) ⊆ support (fs i) :=
fs.toBumpCovering.support_toPartitionOfUnity_subset i
theorem IsSubordinate.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity {f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s} {U : M → Set M}
(h : f.IsSubordinate U) : f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity.IsSubordinate fun i => U (f.c i) :=
h.toBumpCovering.toPartitionOfUnity
theorem sum_toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_eq (x : M) :
∑ᶠ i, fs.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity i x = 1 - ∏ᶠ i, (1 - fs i x) :=
fs.toBumpCovering.sum_toPartitionOfUnity_eq x
end SmoothBumpCovering
variable (I)
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable [IsManifold I ∞ M]
/-- Given two disjoint closed sets `s, t` in a Hausdorff σ-compact finite dimensional manifold,
there exists an infinitely smooth function that is equal to `0` on `s` and to `1` on `t`.
See also `exists_msmooth_zero_iff_one_iff_of_isClosed`, which ensures additionally that
`f` is equal to `0` exactly on `s` and to `1` exactly on `t`. -/
theorem exists_smooth_zero_one_of_isClosed [T2Space M] [SigmaCompactSpace M] {s t : Set M}
(hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hd : Disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, EqOn f 0 s ∧ EqOn f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc 0 1 := by
have : ∀ x ∈ t, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := fun x hx => hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds (disjoint_right.1 hd hx)
rcases SmoothBumpCovering.exists_isSubordinate I ht this with ⟨ι, f, hf⟩
set g := f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity
refine
⟨⟨_, g.contMDiff_sum⟩, fun x hx => ?_, fun x => g.sum_eq_one, fun x =>
⟨g.sum_nonneg x, g.sum_le_one x⟩⟩
suffices ∀ i, g i x = 0 by simp only [this, ContMDiffMap.coeFn_mk, finsum_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
refine fun i => f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_zero_of_zero ?_
exact nmem_support.1 (subset_compl_comm.1 (hf.support_subset i) hx)
/-- Given two disjoint closed sets `s, t` in a Hausdorff normal σ-compact finite dimensional
manifold `M`, there exists a smooth function `f : M → [0,1]` that vanishes in a neighbourhood of `s`
and is equal to `1` in a neighbourhood of `t`. -/
theorem exists_smooth_zero_one_nhds_of_isClosed [T2Space M] [NormalSpace M] [SigmaCompactSpace M]
{s t : Set M} (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hd : Disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, (∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, f x = 0) ∧ (∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ t, f x = 1) ∧
∀ x, f x ∈ Icc 0 1 := by
obtain ⟨u, u_op, hsu, hut⟩ := normal_exists_closure_subset hs ht.isOpen_compl
(subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left.mpr hd.symm)
obtain ⟨v, v_op, htv, hvu⟩ := normal_exists_closure_subset ht isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl
(subset_compl_comm.mp hut)
obtain ⟨f, hfu, hfv, hf⟩ := exists_smooth_zero_one_of_isClosed I isClosed_closure isClosed_closure
(subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left.mp hvu)
refine ⟨f, ?_, ?_, hf⟩
· exact eventually_of_mem (mem_of_superset (u_op.mem_nhdsSet.mpr hsu) subset_closure) hfu
· exact eventually_of_mem (mem_of_superset (v_op.mem_nhdsSet.mpr htv) subset_closure) hfv
/-- Given two sets `s, t` in a Hausdorff normal σ-compact finite-dimensional manifold `M`
with `s` open and `s ⊆ interior t`, there is a smooth function `f : M → [0,1]` which is equal to `s`
in a neighbourhood of `s` and has support contained in `t`. -/
theorem exists_smooth_one_nhds_of_subset_interior [T2Space M] [NormalSpace M] [SigmaCompactSpace M]
{s t : Set M} (hs : IsClosed s) (hd : s ⊆ interior t) :
∃ f : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, (∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, f x = 1) ∧ (∀ x ∉ t, f x = 0) ∧
∀ x, f x ∈ Icc 0 1 := by
rcases exists_smooth_zero_one_nhds_of_isClosed I isOpen_interior.isClosed_compl hs
(by rwa [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl]) with ⟨f, h0, h1, hf⟩
refine ⟨f, h1, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hf⟩
exact h0.self_of_nhdsSet _ fun hx' ↦ hx <| interior_subset hx'
namespace SmoothPartitionOfUnity
/-- A `SmoothPartitionOfUnity` that consists of a single function, uniformly equal to one,
defined as an example for `Inhabited` instance. -/
def single (i : ι) (s : Set M) : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s :=
(BumpCovering.single i s).toSmoothPartitionOfUnity fun j => by
classical
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | h)
· simp only [contMDiff_one, ContinuousMap.coe_one, BumpCovering.coe_single, Pi.single_eq_same]
· simp only [contMDiff_zero, BumpCovering.coe_single, Pi.single_eq_of_ne h,
ContinuousMap.coe_zero]
instance [Inhabited ι] (s : Set M) : Inhabited (SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) :=
⟨single I default s⟩
variable [T2Space M] [SigmaCompactSpace M]
/-- If `X` is a paracompact normal topological space and `U` is an open covering of a closed set
`s`, then there exists a `SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι M s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
theorem exists_isSubordinate {s : Set M} (hs : IsClosed s) (U : ι → Set M) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
| (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s, f.IsSubordinate U := by
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace H := I.locallyCompactSpace
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace M := ChartedSpace.locallyCompactSpace H M
-- porting note(https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/116):
-- split `rcases` into `have` + `rcases`
have := BumpCovering.exists_isSubordinate_of_prop (ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞) ?_ hs U ho hU
· rcases this with ⟨f, hf, hfU⟩
exact ⟨f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf, hfU.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf⟩
· intro s t hs ht hd
rcases exists_smooth_zero_one_of_isClosed I hs ht hd with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f, f.contMDiff, hf⟩
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/PartitionOfUnity.lean | 559 | 570 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
/-! # The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes
In this file, we study the homotopy cofiber `HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber`
of a morphism `φ : F ⟶ G` of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. In this case,
we redefine it as `CochainComplex.mappingCone φ`. The API involves definitions
- `mappingCone.inl φ : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1)`,
- `mappingCone.inr φ : G ⟶ mappingCone φ`,
- `mappingCone.fst φ : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1` and
- `mappingCone.snd φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup ι] [One ι]
{F G : CochainComplex C ι} (φ : F ⟶ G)
instance [∀ p, HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X (p + 1)) (G.X p)] :
HasHomotopyCofiber φ where
hasBinaryBiproduct := by
rintro i _ rfl
infer_instance
end
variable {F G : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G)
variable [HasHomotopyCofiber φ]
/-- The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable def mappingCone := homotopyCofiber φ
namespace mappingCone
open HomComplex
/-- The left inclusion in the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `-1`. -/
noncomputable def inl : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.inlX φ p q (by dsimp; omega))
/-- The right inclusion in the mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def inr : G ⟶ mappingCone φ := homotopyCofiber.inr φ
/-- The first projection from the mapping cone, as a cocyle of degree `1`. -/
noncomputable def fst : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.fstX φ p q hpq)) 2 (by omega) (by
ext p _ rfl
simp [δ_v 1 2 (by omega) _ p (p + 2) (by omega) (p + 1) (p + 1) (by omega) rfl,
homotopyCofiber.d_fstX φ p (p + 1) (p + 2) rfl, mappingCone,
show Int.negOnePow 2 = 1 by rfl])
/-- The second projection from the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `0`. -/
noncomputable def snd : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0 :=
Cochain.ofHoms (homotopyCofiber.sndX φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : q + 1 = p) :
(inl φ).v p q (by rw [← hpq, add_neg_cancel_right]) ≫
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v q p hpq = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inl, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_snd_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q hpq ≫ (snd φ).v q q (add_zero q) = 0 := by
simp [inl, snd]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = 0 := by
simp [inr, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_snd_v (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inr, snd]
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst :
(inl φ).comp (fst φ).1 (neg_add_cancel 1) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F) := by
ext p
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) p (p-1) p rfl (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd :
(inl φ).comp (snd φ) (add_zero (-1)) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero (-1)) p q q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add 1) p p q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G) := by aesop_cat
/-! In order to obtain identities of cochains involving `inl`, `inr`, `fst` and `snd`,
it is often convenient to use an `ext` lemma, and use simp lemmas like `inl_v_f_fst_v`,
but it is sometimes possible to get identities of cochains by using rewrites of
identities of cochains like `inl_fst`. Then, similarly as in category theory,
if we associate the compositions of cochains to the right as much as possible,
it is also interesting to have `reassoc` variants of lemmas, like `inl_fst_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d) (he : 1 + d = e) :
(inl φ).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) (by rw [← he, neg_add_cancel_left]) = γ := by
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) (by omega) (by omega), inl_fst,
Cochain.id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d)
(he : 0 + d = e) (hf : -1 + e = f) :
(inl φ).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = d := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, inl_snd, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d)
(he : 1 + d = e) (hf : 0 + e = f) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = f := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_fst, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d) (he : 0 + d = e) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) (by simp only [← he, zero_add]) = γ := by
obtain rfl : d = e := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_snd, Cochain.id_comp]
lemma ext_to (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i}
(h₁ : f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij)
(h₂ : f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i)) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_to_X φ i j hij h₁ (by simpa [snd] using h₂)
lemma ext_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} (f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) :
f = g ↔ f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij ∧
f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_to φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} {f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A}
(h₁ : (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g)
(h₂ : (inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} (f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) :
f = g ↔ (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g ∧
(inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_from φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma decomp_to {i : ℤ} {A : C} (f : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) (j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
∃ (a : A ⟶ F.X j) (b : A ⟶ G.X i), f = a ≫ (inl φ).v j i (by omega) + b ≫ (inr φ).f i :=
⟨f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij, f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i),
by apply ext_to φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma decomp_from {j : ℤ} {A : C} (f : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) (i : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) :
∃ (a : F.X i ⟶ A) (b : G.X j ⟶ A),
f = (fst φ).1.v j i hij ≫ a + (snd φ).v j j (add_zero j) ≫ b :=
⟨(inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f, (inr φ).f j ≫ f,
by apply ext_from φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma ext_cochain_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K (mappingCone φ) i} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔ γ₁.comp (fst φ).1 hij = γ₂.comp (fst φ).1 hij ∧
γ₁.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) = γ₂.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_to_iff φ q (q + 1) rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ p (q + 1) (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ _ p q (q + 1) hpq rfl] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma ext_cochain_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) K j} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔
(inl φ).comp γ₁ (show _ = i by omega) = (inl φ).comp γ₂ (by omega) ∧
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₁ (zero_add j) =
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₂ (zero_add j) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_from_iff φ (p + 1) p rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ (p + 1) q (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q (by omega)
simp only [Cochain.comp_v (inl φ) _ _ (p + 1) p q (by omega) hpq] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma id :
(fst φ).1.comp (inl φ) (add_neg_cancel 1) +
(snd φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 _) := by
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff φ (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1)]
lemma id_X (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ (inl φ).v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ (inr φ).f p = 𝟙 ((mappingCone φ).X p) := by
simpa only [Cochain.add_v, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, id_f,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p q p hpq (by omega)]
using Cochain.congr_v (id φ) p p (add_zero p)
@[reassoc]
lemma inl_v_d (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + (-1) = j) (hik : k + (-1) = i) :
(inl φ).v i j hij ≫ (mappingCone φ).d j i =
φ.f i ≫ (inr φ).f i - F.d i k ≫ (inl φ).v _ _ hik := by
dsimp [mappingCone, inl, inr]
rw [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d φ j i k (by dsimp; omega) (by dsimp; omega)]
abel
@[reassoc]
lemma inr_f_d (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f n₁ ≫ (mappingCone φ).d n₁ n₂ = G.d n₁ n₂ ≫ (inr φ).f n₂ := by
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma d_fst_v (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) (hjk : j + 1 = k) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (fst φ).1.v j k hjk =
-(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ F.d j k := by
apply homotopyCofiber.d_fstX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_fst_v' (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d (i - 1) i ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij =
-(fst φ).1.v (i - 1) i (by omega) ≫ F.d i j :=
d_fst_v φ (i - 1) i j (by omega) hij
@[reassoc]
lemma d_snd_v (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (snd φ).v j j (add_zero _) =
(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ φ.f j + (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) ≫ G.d i j := by
dsimp [mappingCone, snd, fst]
simp only [Cochain.ofHoms_v]
apply homotopyCofiber.d_sndX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_snd_v' (n : ℤ) :
(mappingCone φ).d (n - 1) n ≫ (snd φ).v n n (add_zero n) =
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v (n - 1) n (by omega) ≫ φ.f n +
(snd φ).v (n - 1) (n - 1) (add_zero _) ≫ G.d (n - 1) n := by
apply d_snd_v
@[simp]
lemma δ_inl :
δ (-1) 0 (inl φ) = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ inr φ) := by
ext p
simp [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) (inl φ) p p (add_zero p) _ _ rfl rfl,
inl_v_d φ p (p - 1) (p + 1) (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma δ_snd :
δ 0 1 (snd φ) = -(fst φ).1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) := by
ext p q hpq
simp [d_snd_v φ p q hpq]
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def descCochain (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n) :
Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n :=
(fst φ).1.comp α (by rw [← h, add_comm]) + (snd φ).comp β (zero_add n)
variable (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n)
@[simp]
lemma inl_descCochain :
(inl φ).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (by omega) = α := by
simp [descCochain]
@[simp]
lemma inr_descCochain :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (zero_add n) = β := by
simp [descCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + (-1) = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + n = p₃) :
(inl φ).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ =
α.v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂, ← h, add_comm m, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left]) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show -1 + n = m by omega) p₁ p₂ p₃
(by omega) (by omega)] using
Cochain.congr_v (inl_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(inr φ).f p₁ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add n) p₁ p₁ p₂ (add_zero p₁) h₁₂, Cochain.ofHom_v]
using Cochain.congr_v (inr_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_descCochain (n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + 1 = n') :
δ n n' (descCochain φ α β h) =
(fst φ).1.comp (δ m n α +
n'.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β (zero_add n)) (by omega) +
(snd φ).comp (δ n n' β) (zero_add n') := by
dsimp only [descCochain]
simp only [δ_add, Cochain.comp_add, δ_comp (fst φ).1 α _ 2 n n' hn' (by omega) (by omega),
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, smul_zero, add_zero,
δ_comp (snd φ) β (zero_add n) 1 n' n' hn' (zero_add 1) hn', δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
smul_neg, Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, Cochain.comp_units_smul, ← hn',
Int.negOnePow_succ, Units.neg_smul, Cochain.comp_neg]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cocycle F K n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def descCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cocycle G K n)
(h : m + 1 = n) (eq : δ m n α = n.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β.1 (zero_add n)) :
Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n :=
Cocycle.mk (descCochain φ α β.1 h) (n + 1) rfl
(by simp [δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ rfl, eq, Int.negOnePow_succ])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `mappingCone φ ⟶ K` that is constructed
from a cochain `α : Cochain F K (-1)` and a morphism `β : G ⟶ K` such that
`δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)`. -/
noncomputable def desc (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K)
(eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)) : mappingCone φ ⟶ K :=
Cocycle.homOf (descCocycle φ α (Cocycle.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) (by simp [eq]))
variable (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K) (eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β))
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_desc :
Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq) = descCochain φ α (Cochain.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_desc_f (p q : ℤ) (h : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q h ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f q = α.v p q h := by
simp [desc]
lemma inl_desc :
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq)) (add_zero _) = α := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_desc_f (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f p = β.f p := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_desc : inr φ ≫ desc φ α β eq = β := by aesop_cat
lemma desc_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(desc φ α β eq).f p = (fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ α.v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ β.f p := by
simp [ext_from_iff _ _ _ hpq]
end
/-- Constructor for homotopies between morphisms from a mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def descHomotopy {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (f₁ f₂ : mappingCone φ ⟶ K)
(γ₁ : Cochain F K (-2)) (γ₂ : Cochain G K (-1))
(h₁ : (inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₁) (add_zero (-1)) =
δ (-2) (-1) γ₁ + (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp γ₂ (zero_add (-1)) +
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₂) (add_zero (-1)))
(h₂ : Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₁) = δ (-1) 0 γ₂ + Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₂)) :
Homotopy f₁ f₂ :=
(Cochain.equivHomotopy f₁ f₂).symm ⟨descCochain φ γ₁ γ₂ (by norm_num), by
simp only [Cochain.ofHom_comp] at h₂
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1), h₁, h₂]⟩
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def liftCochain (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m) :
Cochain K (mappingCone φ) n :=
α.comp (inl φ) (by omega) + β.comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero n)
variable (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_fst :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (fst φ).1 h = α := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_snd :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (snd φ) (add_zero n) = β := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_fst_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + 1 = p₃) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (fst φ).1.v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ = α.v p₁ p₃ (by omega) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ h p₁ p₂ p₃ h₁₂ h₂₃]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_fst φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCochain_v_snd_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(liftCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (snd φ).v p₂ p₂ (add_zero p₂) = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero n) p₁ p₂ p₂ h₁₂ (add_zero p₂)]
using Cochain.congr_v (liftCochain_snd φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_liftCochain (m' : ℤ) (hm' : m + 1 = m') :
δ n m (liftCochain φ α β h) = -(δ m m' α).comp (inl φ) (by omega) +
(δ n m β + α.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m)).comp
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero m) := by
dsimp only [liftCochain]
simp only [δ_add, δ_comp α (inl φ) _ m' _ _ h hm' (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_comp_zero_cochain _ _ _ h, δ_inl, Cochain.ofHom_comp,
Int.negOnePow_neg, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.neg_smul, one_smul,
δ_ofHom, Cochain.comp_zero, zero_add, Cochain.add_comp,
Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain K F m` (with `n + 1 = m`) and `β : Cocycle K G n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def liftCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cocycle K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
(eq : δ n m β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero m) = 0) :
Cocycle K (mappingCone φ) n :=
Cocycle.mk (liftCochain φ α β h) m h (by
simp only [δ_liftCochain φ α β h (m+1) rfl, eq,
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, neg_zero, add_zero])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (α : Cocycle K F 1) (β : Cochain K G 0)
(eq : δ 0 1 β + α.1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) = 0)
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `K ⟶ mappingCone φ` that is constructed
from a cocycle `α : Cochain K F 1` and a cochain `β : Cochain K G 0`
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
noncomputable def lift :
K ⟶ mappingCone φ :=
Cocycle.homOf (liftCocycle φ α β (zero_add 1) eq)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_lift :
Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq) = liftCochain φ α β (zero_add 1) := by
simp only [lift, Cocycle.cochain_ofHom_homOf_eq_coe, liftCocycle_coe]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(lift φ α β eq).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = α.1.v p q hpq := by
simp [lift]
lemma lift_fst :
(Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = α.1 := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_f_snd_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(lift φ α β eq).f p ≫ (snd φ).v p q hpq = β.v p q hpq := by
obtain rfl : q = p := by omega
simp [lift]
lemma lift_snd :
(Cochain.ofHom (lift φ α β eq)).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) = β := by simp
lemma lift_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(lift φ α β eq).f p = α.1.v p q hpq ≫
(inl φ).v q p (by omega) + β.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ (inr φ).f p := by
simp [ext_to_iff _ _ _ hpq]
end
/-- Constructor for homotopies between morphisms to a mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def liftHomotopy {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (f₁ f₂ : K ⟶ mappingCone φ)
(α : Cochain K F 0) (β : Cochain K G (-1))
(h₁ : (Cochain.ofHom f₁).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) =
-δ 0 1 α + (Cochain.ofHom f₂).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1))
(h₂ : (Cochain.ofHom f₁).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) =
δ (-1) 0 β + α.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (zero_add 0) +
(Cochain.ofHom f₂).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0)) :
Homotopy f₁ f₂ :=
(Cochain.equivHomotopy f₁ f₂).symm ⟨liftCochain φ α β (neg_add_cancel 1), by
simp [δ_liftCochain _ _ _ _ _ (zero_add 1), ext_cochain_to_iff _ _ _ (zero_add 1), h₁, h₂]⟩
section
variable {K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) {n' m' : ℤ} (α' : Cochain F L m') (β' : Cochain G L n')
(h : n + 1 = m) (h' : m' + 1 = n') (p : ℤ) (hp : n + n' = p)
|
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_descCochain :
(liftCochain φ α β h).comp (descCochain φ α' β' h') hp =
α.comp α' (by omega) + β.comp β' (by omega) := by
simp [liftCochain, descCochain,
Cochain.comp_assoc α (inl φ) _ _ (show -1 + n' = m' by omega) (by linarith)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/MappingCone.lean | 524 | 530 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
/-!
# Adjunction between `Γ` and `Spec`
We define the adjunction `ΓSpec.adjunction : Γ ⊣ Spec` by defining the unit (`toΓSpec`,
in multiple steps in this file) and counit (done in `Spec.lean`) and checking that they satisfy
the left and right triangle identities. The constructions and proofs make use of
maps and lemmas defined and proved in structure_sheaf.lean extensively.
Notice that since the adjunction is between contravariant functors, you get to choose
one of the two categories to have arrows reversed, and it is equally valid to present
the adjunction as `Spec ⊣ Γ` (`Spec.to_LocallyRingedSpace.right_op ⊣ Γ`), in which
case the unit and the counit would switch to each other.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.identityToΓSpec` : The natural transformation `𝟭 _ ⟶ Γ ⋙ Spec`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ΓSpec.adjunction` : The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from
`CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
universe u
open PrimeSpectrum
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
open TopologicalSpace
open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace
open TopCat.Presheaf
open TopCat.Presheaf.SheafCondition
namespace LocallyRingedSpace
variable (X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
/-- The canonical map from the underlying set to the prime spectrum of `Γ(X)`. -/
def toΓSpecFun : X → PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := fun x =>
comap (X.presheaf.Γgerm x).hom (IsLocalRing.closedPoint (X.presheaf.stalk x))
theorem not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk (r : Γ.obj (op X)) (x : X) :
r ∉ (X.toΓSpecFun x).asIdeal ↔ IsUnit (X.presheaf.Γgerm x r) := by
simp [toΓSpecFun, IsLocalRing.closedPoint]
/-- The preimage of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` under the unit is the basic
open in `X` defined by the same element (they are equal as sets). -/
theorem toΓSpec_preimage_basicOpen_eq (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
X.toΓSpecFun ⁻¹' basicOpen r = SetLike.coe (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r) := by
ext
dsimp
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [X.toRingedSpace.mem_top_basicOpen]
exact not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk ..
/-- `toΓSpecFun` is continuous. -/
theorem toΓSpec_continuous : Continuous X.toΓSpecFun := by
rw [isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.continuous_iff]
rintro _ ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [X.toΓSpec_preimage_basicOpen_eq r]
exact (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r).2
/-- The canonical (bundled) continuous map from the underlying topological
space of `X` to the prime spectrum of its global sections. -/
def toΓSpecBase : X.toTopCat ⟶ Spec.topObj (Γ.obj (op X)) :=
TopCat.ofHom
{ toFun := X.toΓSpecFun
continuous_toFun := X.toΓSpec_continuous }
variable (r : Γ.obj (op X))
/-- The preimage in `X` of a basic open in `Spec Γ(X)` (as an open set). -/
abbrev toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : Opens X :=
(Opens.map X.toΓSpecBase).obj (basicOpen r)
/-- The preimage is the basic open in `X` defined by the same element `r`. -/
theorem toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq : X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r = X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen r :=
Opens.ext (X.toΓSpec_preimage_basicOpen_eq r)
/-- The map from the global sections `Γ(X)` to the sections on the (preimage of) a basic open. -/
abbrev toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen :
X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) ⟶ X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
X.presheaf.map (X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r).leTop.op
/-- `r` is a unit as a section on the basic open defined by `r`. -/
theorem isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen : IsUnit (X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r r) := by
convert
(X.presheaf.map <| (eqToHom <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen_eq r).op).hom.isUnit_map
(X.toRingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen r)
rw [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr
/-- Define the sheaf hom on individual basic opens for the unit. -/
def toΓSpecCApp :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r) :=
-- note: the explicit type annotations were not needed before
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/19757
CommRingCat.ofHom <|
IsLocalization.Away.lift
(R := Γ.obj (op X))
(S := (structureSheaf ↑(Γ.obj (op X))).val.obj (op (basicOpen r)))
r
(isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen _ r)
/-- Characterization of the sheaf hom on basic opens,
direction ← (next lemma) is used at various places, but → is not used in this file. -/
theorem toΓSpecCApp_iff
(f :
(structureSheaf <| Γ.obj <| op X).val.obj (op <| basicOpen r) ⟶
X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)) :
toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ f = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r ↔ f = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
-- Porting Note: Type class problem got stuck in `IsLocalization.Away.AwayMap.lift_comp`
-- created instance manually. This replaces the `pick_goal` tactics
have loc_inst := IsLocalization.to_basicOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) r
refine ConcreteCategory.ext_iff.trans ?_
rw [← @IsLocalization.Away.lift_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r loc_inst _
(X.isUnit_res_toΓSpecMapBasicOpen r)]
--pick_goal 5; exact is_localization.to_basic_open _ r
constructor
· intro h
ext : 1
exact IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (Submonoid.powers r) h
apply congr_arg
theorem toΓSpecCApp_spec : toOpen _ (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecCApp r = X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecCApp_iff r _).2 rfl
/-- The sheaf hom on all basic opens, commuting with restrictions. -/
@[simps app]
def toΓSpecCBasicOpens :
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 ⟶
(inducedFunctor basicOpen).op ⋙ ((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ X.toΓSpecBase).obj X.𝒪).1 where
app r := X.toΓSpecCApp r.unop
naturality r s f := by
apply (StructureSheaf.to_basicOpen_epi (Γ.obj (op X)) r.unop).1
simp only [← Category.assoc]
rw [X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r.unop]
convert X.toΓSpecCApp_spec s.unop
symm
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
/-- The canonical morphism of sheafed spaces from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps]
def toΓSpecSheafedSpace : X.toSheafedSpace ⟶ Spec.toSheafedSpace.obj (op (Γ.obj (op X))) where
base := X.toΓSpecBase
c :=
TopCat.Sheaf.restrictHomEquivHom (structureSheaf (Γ.obj (op X))).1 _ isBasis_basic_opens
X.toΓSpecCBasicOpens
theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq :
X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) = X.toΓSpecCApp r := by
apply TopCat.Sheaf.extend_hom_app _ _ _
-- Porting note: need a helper lemma `toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec_assoc` to help compile
-- `toStalk_stalkMap_to_Γ_Spec`
@[reassoc] theorem toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec (r : Γ.obj (op X)) :
toOpen (Γ.obj (op X)) (basicOpen r) ≫ X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.c.app (op (basicOpen r)) =
X.toToΓSpecMapBasicOpen r :=
(X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_eq r).symm ▸ X.toΓSpecCApp_spec r
/-- The map on stalks induced by the unit commutes with maps from `Γ(X)` to
stalks (in `Spec Γ(X)` and in `X`). -/
theorem toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec (x : X) :
toStalk _ _ ≫ X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace.stalkMap x = X.presheaf.Γgerm x := by
rw [PresheafedSpace.Hom.stalkMap,
← toOpen_germ _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X))) _ (by rw [basicOpen_one]; trivial),
← Category.assoc, Category.assoc (toOpen _ _), stalkFunctor_map_germ, ← Category.assoc,
toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, Γgerm]
erw [← stalkPushforward_germ _ _ X.presheaf ⊤]
congr 1
exact (X.toΓSpecBase _* X.presheaf).germ_res le_top.hom _ _
/-- The canonical morphism from `X` to the spectrum of its global sections. -/
@[simps! base]
def toΓSpec : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (Γ.obj (op X)) where
__ := X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace
prop := by
intro x
let p : PrimeSpectrum (Γ.obj (op X)) := X.toΓSpecFun x
constructor
-- show stalk map is local hom ↓
let S := (structureSheaf _).presheaf.stalk p
rintro (t : S) ht
obtain ⟨⟨r, s⟩, he⟩ := IsLocalization.surj p.asIdeal.primeCompl t
dsimp at he
set t' := _
change t * t' = _ at he
apply isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (y := t')
rw [he]
refine IsLocalization.map_units S (⟨r, ?_⟩ : p.asIdeal.primeCompl)
apply (not_mem_prime_iff_unit_in_stalk _ _ _).mpr
rw [← toStalk_stalkMap_toΓSpec, CommRingCat.comp_apply]
erw [← he]
rw [RingHom.map_mul]
exact ht.mul <| (IsLocalization.map_units (R := Γ.obj (op X)) S s).map _
/-- On a locally ringed space `X`, the preimage of the zero locus of the prime spectrum
of `Γ(X, ⊤)` under `toΓSpec` agrees with the associated zero locus on `X`. -/
lemma toΓSpec_preimage_zeroLocus_eq {X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}}
(s : Set (X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤))) :
X.toΓSpec.base ⁻¹' PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus s = X.toRingedSpace.zeroLocus s := by
simp only [RingedSpace.zeroLocus]
have (i : LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.obj (op X)) (_ : i ∈ s) :
(SetLike.coe (X.toRingedSpace.basicOpen i))ᶜ =
X.toΓSpec.base ⁻¹' ((PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen i).carrier)ᶜ := by
symm
rw [Set.preimage_compl, Opens.carrier_eq_coe]
erw [X.toΓSpec_preimage_basicOpen_eq i]
erw [Set.iInter₂_congr this]
simp_rw [← Set.preimage_iInter₂, Opens.carrier_eq_coe, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl,
compl_compl]
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iUnion₂]
simp
theorem comp_ring_hom_ext {X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}} {R : CommRingCat.{u}} {f : R ⟶ Γ.obj (op X)}
{β : X ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R}
(w : X.toΓSpec.base ≫ (Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f).base = β.base)
(h :
∀ r : R,
f ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top : (Opens.map β.base).obj (basicOpen r) ⟶ _).op =
toOpen R (basicOpen r) ≫ β.c.app (op (basicOpen r))) :
X.toΓSpec ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f = β := by
ext1
refine Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext w ?_
intro r U
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_c_app]
erw [toOpen_comp_comap_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
exact h r
/-- `toSpecΓ _` is an isomorphism so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem Γ_Spec_left_triangle : toSpecΓ (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ X.toΓSpec.c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ := by
unfold toSpecΓ
rw [← toOpen_res _ (basicOpen (1 : Γ.obj (op X))) ⊤ (eqToHom basicOpen_one.symm),
Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality, ← Category.assoc]
erw [X.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec 1, ← Functor.map_comp]
convert eqToHom_map X.presheaf _; rfl
end LocallyRingedSpace
/-- The unit as a natural transformation. -/
def identityToΓSpec : 𝟭 LocallyRingedSpace.{u} ⟶ Γ.rightOp ⋙ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace where
app := LocallyRingedSpace.toΓSpec
naturality X Y f := by
symm
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext1 x
dsimp
show PrimeSpectrum.comap (f.c.app (op ⊤)).hom (X.toΓSpecFun x) = Y.toΓSpecFun (f.base x)
dsimp [toΓSpecFun]
rw [← IsLocalRing.comap_closedPoint (f.stalkMap x).hom, ←
PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply, ← PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply,
← CommRingCat.hom_comp, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp]
congr 3
exact (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ f.1 ⊤ x trivial).symm
· intro r
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_c_app, ← Category.assoc]
erw [Y.toΓSpecSheafedSpace_app_spec, f.c.naturality]
rfl
namespace ΓSpec
theorem left_triangle (X : LocallyRingedSpace) :
SpecΓIdentity.inv.app (Γ.obj (op X)) ≫ (identityToΓSpec.app X).c.app (op ⊤) = 𝟙 _ :=
X.Γ_Spec_left_triangle
/-- `SpecΓIdentity` is iso so these are mutually two-sided inverses. -/
theorem right_triangle (R : CommRingCat) :
identityToΓSpec.app (Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj <| op R) ≫
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map (SpecΓIdentity.inv.app R).op =
𝟙 _ := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.comp_ring_hom_ext
· ext (p : PrimeSpectrum R)
dsimp
refine PrimeSpectrum.ext (Ideal.ext fun x => ?_)
rw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p)
p.asIdeal x]
rfl
· intro r; apply toOpen_res
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
-- Porting note: `simps` generates lemmas not in `simp` normal form, so `unit` and `counit` have to
-- be added manually
def locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction : Γ.rightOp ⊣ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.{u} where
unit := identityToΓSpec
counit := (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity).inv
left_triangle_components X := by
simp only [Functor.id_obj, Functor.rightOp_obj, Γ_obj, Functor.comp_obj,
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace_obj, Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_toSheafedSpace,
Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_carrier, Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_presheaf, Functor.rightOp_map, Γ_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, NatIso.op_inv, NatTrans.op_app, SpecΓIdentity_inv_app]
exact congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op (left_triangle X)
right_triangle_components R := by
simp only [Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace_obj, Functor.id_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Functor.rightOp_obj,
Γ_obj, Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_toSheafedSpace, Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_carrier,
Spec.sheafedSpaceObj_presheaf, NatIso.op_inv, NatTrans.op_app, op_unop, SpecΓIdentity_inv_app,
Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op]
exact right_triangle R.unop
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_unit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.unit = identityToΓSpec := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit = (NatIso.op SpecΓIdentity.{u}).inv := rfl
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app R =
(toOpen R.unop ⊤).op := rfl
@[simp]
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app (op <| CommRingCat.of R) =
(toOpen R ⊤).op := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ R) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X R f =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f.unop := rfl
lemma locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_apply'
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ Γ.obj <| op X) :
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) (op f) =
identityToΓSpec.app X ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f := rfl
lemma toOpen_comp_locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_homEquiv_app
{X : LocallyRingedSpace} {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
(f : Γ.rightOp.obj X ⟶ op (CommRingCat.of R)) (U) :
StructureSheaf.toOpen R U.unop ≫
(locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X (op <| CommRingCat.of R) f).c.app U =
f.unop ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op := by
rw [← StructureSheaf.toOpen_res _ _ _ (homOfLE le_top), Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality _ (homOfLE (le_top (a := U.unop))).op,
show (toOpen R ⊤) = (toOpen R ⊤).op.unop from rfl,
← locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction_counit_app']
simp_rw [← Γ_map_op]
rw [← Γ.rightOp_map_unop, ← Category.assoc, ← unop_comp, ← Adjunction.homEquiv_counit,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
rfl
/-- The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` from `CommRingᵒᵖ` to `Scheme`. -/
def adjunction : Scheme.Γ.rightOp ⊣ Scheme.Spec.{u} where
unit :=
{ app := fun X ↦ ⟨locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.{u}.unit.app X.toLocallyRingedSpace⟩
naturality := fun _ _ f ↦
Scheme.Hom.ext' (locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.{u}.unit.naturality f.toLRSHom) }
counit := (NatIso.op Scheme.SpecΓIdentity.{u}).inv
left_triangle_components Y :=
locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.left_triangle_components Y.toLocallyRingedSpace
right_triangle_components R :=
Scheme.Hom.ext' <| locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.right_triangle_components R
theorem adjunction_homEquiv_apply {X : Scheme} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : (op <| Scheme.Γ.obj <| op X) ⟶ R) :
ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R f = ⟨locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R f⟩ := rfl
theorem adjunction_homEquiv_symm_apply {X : Scheme} {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ}
(f : X ⟶ Scheme.Spec.obj R) :
(ΓSpec.adjunction.homEquiv X R).symm f =
(locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.homEquiv X.1 R).symm f.toLRSHom := rfl
| theorem adjunction_counit_app' {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ} :
ΓSpec.adjunction.counit.app R = locallyRingedSpaceAdjunction.counit.app R := rfl
@[simp]
theorem adjunction_counit_app {R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ} :
ΓSpec.adjunction.counit.app R = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso (unop R)).inv.op := rfl
/-- The canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X, ⊤)`. This is the unit of the `Γ-Spec` adjunction. -/
def _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.toSpecΓ (X : Scheme.{u}) : X ⟶ Spec Γ(X, ⊤) :=
ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X
@[simp]
theorem adjunction_unit_app {X : Scheme} :
ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X = X.toSpecΓ := rfl
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean | 392 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
/-!
# Opposite categories
We provide a category instance on `Cᵒᵖ`.
The morphisms `X ⟶ Y` are defined to be the morphisms `unop Y ⟶ unop X` in `C`.
Here `Cᵒᵖ` is an irreducible typeclass synonym for `C`
(it is the same one used in the algebra library).
We also provide various mechanisms for constructing opposite morphisms, functors,
and natural transformations.
Unfortunately, because we do not have a definitional equality `op (op X) = X`,
there are quite a few variations that are needed in practice.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
open Opposite
variable {C : Type u₁}
section Quiver
variable [Quiver.{v₁} C]
theorem Quiver.Hom.op_inj {X Y : C} :
Function.Injective (Quiver.Hom.op : (X ⟶ Y) → (Opposite.op Y ⟶ Opposite.op X)) := fun _ _ H =>
congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop H
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_inj {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} :
Function.Injective (Quiver.Hom.unop : (X ⟶ Y) → (Opposite.unop Y ⟶ Opposite.unop X)) :=
fun _ _ H => congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op H
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.op.unop = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_op' {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} {x} :
@Quiver.Hom.unop C _ X Y no_index (Opposite.op (unop := x)) = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.op_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.unop.op = f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_mk {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Quiver.Hom.unop {unop := f} = f := rfl
end Quiver
namespace CategoryTheory
variable [Category.{v₁} C]
/-- The opposite category. -/
@[stacks 001M]
instance Category.opposite : Category.{v₁} Cᵒᵖ where
comp f g := (g.unop ≫ f.unop).op
id X := (𝟙 (unop X)).op
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem op_comp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g).op = g.op ≫ f.op :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_id {X : C} : (𝟙 X).op = 𝟙 (op X) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem unop_comp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g).unop = g.unop ≫ f.unop :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_id {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 X).unop = 𝟙 (unop X) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_id_op {X : C} : (𝟙 (op X)).unop = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_id_unop {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 (unop X)).op = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
section
variable (C)
/-- The functor from the double-opposite of a category to the underlying category. -/
@[simps]
def unopUnop : Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ ⥤ C where
obj X := unop (unop X)
map f := f.unop.unop
/-- The functor from a category to its double-opposite. -/
@[simps]
def opOp : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (op X)
map f := f.op.op
/-- The double opposite category is equivalent to the original. -/
@[simps]
def opOpEquivalence : Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ ≌ C where
functor := unopUnop C
inverse := opOp C
unitIso := Iso.refl (𝟭 Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ)
counitIso := Iso.refl (opOp C ⋙ unopUnop C)
instance : (opOp C).IsEquivalence :=
(opOpEquivalence C).isEquivalence_inverse
instance : (unopUnop C).IsEquivalence :=
(opOpEquivalence C).isEquivalence_functor
end
/-- If `f` is an isomorphism, so is `f.op` -/
instance isIso_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.op :=
⟨⟨(inv f).op, ⟨Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp), Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)⟩⟩⟩
/-- If `f.op` is an isomorphism `f` must be too.
(This cannot be an instance as it would immediately loop!)
-/
theorem isIso_of_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f.op] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨(inv f.op).unop, ⟨Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp), Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)⟩⟩⟩
theorem isIso_op_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : IsIso f.op ↔ IsIso f :=
⟨fun _ => isIso_of_op _, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
theorem isIso_unop_iff {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : IsIso f.unop ↔ IsIso f := by
rw [← isIso_op_iff f.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop]
instance isIso_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.unop :=
(isIso_unop_iff _).2 inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem op_inv {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : (inv f).op = inv f.op := by
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id
rw [← op_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, op_id]
@[simp]
theorem unop_inv {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : (inv f).unop = inv f.unop := by
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id
rw [← unop_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, unop_id]
namespace Functor
section
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- The opposite of a functor, i.e. considering a functor `F : C ⥤ D` as a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these. -/
@[simps]
protected def op (F : C ⥤ D) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (F.obj (unop X))
map f := (F.map f.unop).op
/-- Given a functor `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` we can take the "unopposite" functor `F : C ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these.
-/
@[simps]
protected def unop (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : C ⥤ D where
obj X := unop (F.obj (op X))
map f := (F.map f.op).unop
/-- The isomorphism between `F.op.unop` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def opUnopIso (F : C ⥤ D) : F.op.unop ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- The isomorphism between `F.unop.op` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def unopOpIso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.unop.op ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
variable (C D)
/-- Taking the opposite of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def opHom : (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj F := (unop F).op
map α :=
{ app := fun X => (α.unop.app (unop X)).op
naturality := fun _ _ f => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (α.unop.naturality f.unop).symm }
/-- Take the "unopposite" of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def opInv : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) ⥤ (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ where
obj F := op F.unop
map α :=
Quiver.Hom.op
{ app := fun X => (α.app (op X)).unop
naturality := fun _ _ f => Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| (α.naturality f.op).symm }
variable {C D}
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` into a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def leftOp (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj X := unop (F.obj (unop X))
map f := (F.map f.unop).unop
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D` into a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def rightOp (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (F.obj (op X))
map f := (F.map f.op).op
lemma rightOp_map_unop {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.rightOp.map f).unop = F.map f.op := rfl
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [Full F] : Full F.op where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.unop).op, by simp⟩
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.op where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by simpa using map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.op_inj h)
/-- If F is faithful then the right_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance rightOp_faithful {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.rightOp where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.op_inj h))
/-- If F is faithful then the left_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance leftOp_faithful {F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.leftOp where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h))
instance rightOp_full {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} [Full F] : Full F.rightOp where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.unop).unop, by simp⟩
instance leftOp_full {F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} [Full F] : Full F.leftOp where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.op).op, by simp⟩
/-- The isomorphism between `F.leftOp.rightOp` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def leftOpRightOpIso (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.leftOp.rightOp ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- The isomorphism between `F.rightOp.leftOp` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def rightOpLeftOpIso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : F.rightOp.leftOp ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- Whenever possible, it is advisable to use the isomorphism `rightOpLeftOpIso`
instead of this equality of functors. -/
theorem rightOp_leftOp_eq (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : F.rightOp.leftOp = F := by
cases F
rfl
end
end Functor
namespace NatTrans
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
section
variable {F G : C ⥤ D}
/-- The opposite of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps]
protected def op (α : F ⟶ G) : G.op ⟶ F.op where
app X := (α.app (unop X)).op
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem op_id (F : C ⥤ D) : NatTrans.op (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 F.op :=
rfl
/-- The "unopposite" of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps]
protected def unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F ⟶ G) : G.unop ⟶ F.unop where
app X := (α.app (op X)).unop
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
|
@[simp]
theorem unop_id (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : NatTrans.unop (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 F.unop :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Opposites.lean | 293 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut instance for `mem_graph_iff`.
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical
simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.comp_def, image_id']
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
-- Porting note: need either `dsimp only` or to specify `hf`:
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' := mapRange_add (hf := f.map_zero) f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
variable [Zero M]
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, we can map `l : α →₀ M` to `equivMapDomain f l : β →₀ M` (computably)
by mapping the support forwards and the function backwards. -/
def equivMapDomain (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := l.support.map f.toEmbedding
toFun a := l (f.symm a)
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [Finset.mem_map_equiv, mem_support_toFun]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (b : β) :
equivMapDomain f l b = l (f.symm b) :=
rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : β →₀ M) (a : α) :
equivMapDomain f.symm l a = l (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_refl (l : α →₀ M) : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) l = l := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_refl' : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) = @id (α →₀ M) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain (f.trans g) l = equivMapDomain g (equivMapDomain f l) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans' (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
@equivMapDomain _ _ M _ (f.trans g) = equivMapDomain g ∘ equivMapDomain f := by ext x; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_single (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : M) :
equivMapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b := by
classical
ext x
simp only [single_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, equivMapDomain_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_zero {f : α ≃ β} : equivMapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) := by
ext; simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_equivMapDomain [CommMonoid N] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (g : β → M → N) :
prod (equivMapDomain f l) g = prod l (fun a m => g (f a) m) := by
simp [prod, equivMapDomain]
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, the finitely supported function spaces are also in bijection:
`(α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M)`.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Equiv.piCongrLeft`. -/
def equivCongrLeft (f : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M) := by
refine ⟨equivMapDomain f, equivMapDomain f.symm, fun f => ?_, fun f => ?_⟩ <;> ext x <;>
simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : equivCongrLeft f l = equivMapDomain f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
(@equivCongrLeft _ _ M _ f).symm = equivCongrLeft f.symm :=
rfl
end Finsupp
end EquivCongrLeft
section CastFinsupp
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M)
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_sum _ _
end Nat
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommGroupWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_sum _ _
end Int
namespace Rat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_sum _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [Field R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
end Rat
end CastFinsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapDomain` -/
namespace Finsupp
section MapDomain
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {v v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `mapDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `a : β` is the sum
of `v x` over all `x` such that `f x = a`. -/
def mapDomain (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M :=
v.sum fun a => single (f a)
theorem mapDomain_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum_eq_single a, single_eq_same]
· intro b _ hba
exact single_eq_of_ne (hf.ne hba)
· intro _
rw [single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem mapDomain_notin_range {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f x a = 0 := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun a' _ => single_eq_of_ne fun eq => h <| eq ▸ Set.mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_id : mapDomain id v = v :=
sum_single _
theorem mapDomain_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
mapDomain (g ∘ f) v = mapDomain g (mapDomain f v) := by
refine ((sum_sum_index ?_ ?_).trans ?_).symm
· intro
exact single_zero _
· intro
exact single_add _
refine sum_congr fun _ _ => sum_single_index ?_
exact single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_single {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : M} : mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
sum_single_index <| single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_zero {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) :=
sum_zero_index
theorem mapDomain_congr {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ x ∈ v.support, f x = g x) :
v.mapDomain f = v.mapDomain g :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ H => by simp only [h _ H]
theorem mapDomain_add {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) = mapDomain f v₁ + mapDomain f v₂ :=
sum_add_index' (fun _ => single_zero _) fun _ => single_add _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_equiv_apply {f : α ≃ β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) :
mapDomain f x a = x (f.symm a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply a]
exact mapDomain_apply f.injective _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α → β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_zero' := mapDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id : mapDomain.addMonoidHom id = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f ∘ g) : (α →₀ M) →+ γ →₀ M) =
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom g) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
theorem mapDomain_finset_sum {f : α → β} {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (∑ i ∈ s, v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, mapDomain f (v i) :=
map_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) _ _
theorem mapDomain_sum [Zero N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ N} {v : α → N → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
map_finsuppSum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M) _ _
theorem mapDomain_support [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} :
(s.mapDomain f).support ⊆ s.support.image f :=
Finset.Subset.trans support_sum <|
Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.biUnion_mono fun _ _ => support_single_subset) <| by
rw [Finset.biUnion_singleton]
theorem mapDomain_apply' (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (hS : (x.support : Set α) ⊆ S)
(hf : Set.InjOn f S) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ S) : mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
classical
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
simp_rw [single_apply]
by_cases hax : a ∈ x.support
· rw [← Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ hax, if_pos rfl]
convert add_zero (x a)
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact (hf.mono hS).ne (Finset.mem_of_mem_erase hi) hax (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hi)
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hax]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact hf.ne (hS hi) ha (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hax)
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (s : α →₀ M)
(hf : Set.InjOn f s.support) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm mapDomain_support <| by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Ne] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_h_left, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne]
rw [mapDomain_apply' (↑s.support : Set _) _ _ hf]
· exact hx_h_left
· simp only [mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact hx_h_left
· exact Subset.refl _
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injective [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : α →₀ M) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
mapDomain_support_of_injOn s hf.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(h_zero : ∀ b, h b 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀ b m₁ m₂, h b (m₁ + m₂) = h b m₁ * h b m₂) :
(mapDomain f s).prod h = s.prod fun a m => h (f a) m :=
(prod_sum_index h_zero h_add).trans <| prod_congr fun _ _ => prod_single_index (h_zero _)
-- Note that in `prod_mapDomain_index`, `M` is still an additive monoid,
-- so there is no analogous version in terms of `MonoidHom`.
/-- A version of `sum_mapDomain_index` that takes a bundled `AddMonoidHom`,
rather than separate linearity hypotheses.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom [AddCommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M}
(h : β → M →+ N) : ((mapDomain f s).sum fun b m => h b m) = s.sum fun a m => h (f a) m :=
sum_mapDomain_index (fun b => (h b).map_zero) (fun b _ _ => (h b).map_add _ _)
theorem embDomain_eq_mapDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : embDomain f v = mapDomain f v := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [mapDomain_apply f.injective, embDomain_apply]
· rw [mapDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range] <;> assumption
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index_inj [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (s.mapDomain f).prod h = s.prod fun a b => h (f a) b := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk f hf, ← embDomain_eq_mapDomain, prod_embDomain]
theorem mapDomain_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) := by
intro v₁ v₂ eq
ext a
have : mapDomain f v₁ (f a) = mapDomain f v₂ (f a) := by rw [eq]
rwa [mapDomain_apply hf, mapDomain_apply hf] at this
/-- When `f` is an embedding we have an embedding `(α →₀ ℕ) ↪ (β →₀ ℕ)` given by `mapDomain`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ ℕ) ↪ β →₀ ℕ :=
⟨Finsupp.mapDomain f, Finsupp.mapDomain_injective f.injective⟩
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (g : M →+ N) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom g) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom g).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.mapRange_single, Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_apply,
Finsupp.singleAddHom_apply, eq_self_iff_true, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_single,
Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_apply]
/-- When `g` preserves addition, `mapRange` and `mapDomain` commute. -/
theorem mapDomain_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) (g : M → N) (h0 : g 0 = 0)
(hadd : ∀ x y, g (x + y) = g x + g y) :
mapDomain f (mapRange g h0 v) = mapRange g h0 (mapDomain f v) :=
let g' : M →+ N :=
{ toFun := g
map_zero' := h0
map_add' := hadd }
DFunLike.congr_fun (mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange f g') v
theorem sum_update_add [AddZeroClass α] [AddCommMonoid β] (f : ι →₀ α) (i : ι) (a : α)
(g : ι → α → β) (hg : ∀ i, g i 0 = 0)
(hgg : ∀ (j : ι) (a₁ a₂ : α), g j (a₁ + a₂) = g j a₁ + g j a₂) :
(f.update i a).sum g + g i (f i) = f.sum g + g i a := by
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg]
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.update_self f i]
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg, add_assoc, add_assoc]
congr 1
rw [add_comm, sum_single_index (hg _), sum_single_index (hg _)]
theorem mapDomain_injOn (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (hf : Set.InjOn f S) :
Set.InjOn (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) { w | (w.support : Set α) ⊆ S } := by
intro v₁ hv₁ v₂ hv₂ eq
ext a
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ v₁.support ∪ v₂.support
· rw [← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₁ hf _, ← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₂ hf _, eq] <;>
· apply Set.union_subset hv₁ hv₂
exact mod_cast h
· simp only [not_or, mem_union, not_not, mem_support_iff] at h
simp [h]
theorem equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain {M} [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain f l = mapDomain f l := by ext x; simp [mapDomain_equiv_apply]
end MapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `comapDomain` -/
section ComapDomain
/-- Given `f : α → β`, `l : β →₀ M` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on
the preimage of `l.support`, `comapDomain f l hf` is the finitely supported function
from `α` to `M` given by composing `l` with `f`. -/
@[simps support]
def comapDomain [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support)) :
α →₀ M where
support := l.support.preimage f hf
toFun a := l (f a)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_def.symm, Finset.mem_preimage]
exact l.mem_support_toFun (f a)
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_apply [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support))
(a : α) : comapDomain f l hf a = l (f a) :=
rfl
theorem sum_comapDomain [Zero M] [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (g : β → M → N)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) :
(comapDomain f l hf.injOn).sum (g ∘ f) = l.sum g := by
simp only [sum, comapDomain_apply, (· ∘ ·), comapDomain]
exact Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij f _ hf fun x => g x (l x)
theorem eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) : comapDomain f l hf.injOn = 0 → l = 0 := by
rw [← support_eq_empty, ← support_eq_empty, comapDomain]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, mem_preimage]
intro h a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hf.2.2 ha
exact h b (hb.2.symm ▸ ha)
section FInjective
section Zero
variable [Zero M]
lemma embDomain_comapDomain {f : α ↪ β} {g : β →₀ M} (hg : ↑g.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
embDomain f (comapDomain f g f.injective.injOn) = g := by
ext b
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hb
rw [embDomain_apply, comapDomain_apply]
· replace hg : g b = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.mp <| mt (hg ·) hb
rw [embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ hb, hg]
/-- Note the `hif` argument is needed for this to work in `rw`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_zero (f : α → β)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(0 : β →₀ M).support) := Finset.coe_empty ▸ (Set.injOn_empty f)) :
comapDomain f (0 : β →₀ M) hif = (0 : α →₀ M) := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_single (f : α → β) (a : α) (m : M)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' (single (f a) m).support)) :
comapDomain f (Finsupp.single (f a) m) hif = Finsupp.single a m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp only [single_zero, comapDomain_zero]
· rw [eq_single_iff, comapDomain_apply, comapDomain_support, ← Finset.coe_subset, coe_preimage,
support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton, coe_singleton, single_eq_same]
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton] at hif
exact ⟨fun x hx => hif hx rfl hx, rfl⟩
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {f : α → β}
theorem comapDomain_add (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) (hv₁ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₁.support))
(hv₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₂.support)) (hv₁₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(v₁ + v₂).support)) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hv₁₂ = comapDomain f v₁ hv₁ + comapDomain f v₂ hv₂ := by
ext
simp only [comapDomain_apply, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
/-- A version of `Finsupp.comapDomain_add` that's easier to use. -/
theorem comapDomain_add_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hf.injOn =
comapDomain f v₁ hf.injOn + comapDomain f v₂ hf.injOn :=
comapDomain_add _ _ _ _ _
/-- `Finsupp.comapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def comapDomain.addMonoidHom (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun x := comapDomain f x hf.injOn
map_zero' := comapDomain_zero f
map_add' := comapDomain_add_of_injective hf
end AddZeroClass
variable [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β)
theorem mapDomain_comapDomain (hf : Function.Injective f) (l : β →₀ M)
(hl : ↑l.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f (comapDomain f l hf.injOn) = l := by
conv_rhs => rw [← embDomain_comapDomain (f := ⟨f, hf⟩) hl (M := M), embDomain_eq_mapDomain]
rfl
end FInjective
end ComapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is an `Option` type -/
section Option
/-- Restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported function on `α`. -/
def some [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) : α →₀ M :=
f.comapDomain Option.some fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem some_apply [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.some a = f (Option.some a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem some_zero [Zero M] : (0 : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_add [AddZeroClass M] (f g : Option α →₀ M) : (f + g).some = f.some + g.some := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_none [Zero M] (m : M) : (single none m : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_some [Zero M] (a : α) (m : M) :
(single (Option.some a) m : Option α →₀ M).some = single a m := by
classical
ext b
simp [single_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_option_index [AddZeroClass M] [CommMonoid N] (f : Option α →₀ M)
(b : Option α → M → N) (h_zero : ∀ o, b o 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ o m₁ m₂, b o (m₁ + m₂) = b o m₁ * b o m₂) :
f.prod b = b none (f none) * f.some.prod fun a => b (Option.some a) := by
classical
induction f using induction_linear with
| zero => simp [some_zero, h_zero]
| add f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ =>
rw [Finsupp.prod_add_index, h₁, h₂, some_add, Finsupp.prod_add_index]
· simp only [h_add, Pi.add_apply, Finsupp.coe_add]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
all_goals simp [h_zero, h_add]
| single a m => cases a <;> simp [h_zero, h_add]
theorem sum_option_index_smul [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f : Option α →₀ R)
(b : Option α → M) :
(f.sum fun o r => r • b o) = f none • b none + f.some.sum fun a r => r • b (Option.some a) :=
f.sum_option_index _ (fun _ => zero_smul _ _) fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
theorem eq_option_embedding_update_none_iff [Zero M] {n : Option α →₀ M} {m : α →₀ M} {i : M} :
(n = (embDomain Embedding.some m).update none i) ↔
n none = i ∧ n.some = m := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff, Option.forall, Finsupp.ext_iff]
apply and_congr
· simp
· apply forall_congr'
intro
simp only [coe_update, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, update_of_ne, some_apply]
rw [← Embedding.some_apply, embDomain_apply, Embedding.some_apply]
@[simp] lemma some_embDomain_some [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : (f.embDomain .some).some = f := by
ext; rw [some_apply]; exact embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma embDomain_some_none [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : f.embDomain .some .none = 0 :=
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ (by simp)
end Option
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.filter` -/
section Filter
section Zero
variable [Zero M] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M)
/--
`Finsupp.filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true and `0`
otherwise. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if p a then f a else 0
support := f.support.filter p
mem_support_toFun a := by
split_ifs with h <;>
· simp only [h, mem_filter, mem_support_iff]
tauto
theorem filter_apply (a : α) : f.filter p a = if p a then f a else 0 := rfl
theorem filter_eq_indicator : ⇑(f.filter p) = Set.indicator { x | p x } f := by
ext
simp [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
theorem filter_eq_zero_iff : f.filter p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem filter_eq_self_iff : f.filter p = f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, Set.indicator_apply_eq_self, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
not_imp_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_pos {a : α} (h : p a) : f.filter p a = f a := if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_neg {a : α} (h : ¬p a) : f.filter p a = 0 := if_neg h
@[simp]
theorem support_filter : (f.filter p).support = {x ∈ f.support | p x} := rfl
theorem filter_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).filter p = 0 := by
classical rw [← support_eq_empty, support_filter, support_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_pos {a : α} {b : M} (h : p a) : (single a b).filter p = single a b :=
(filter_eq_self_iff _ _).2 fun _ hx => (single_apply_ne_zero.1 hx).1.symm ▸ h
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_neg {a : α} {b : M} (h : ¬p a) : (single a b).filter p = 0 :=
(filter_eq_zero_iff _ _).2 fun _ hpx =>
single_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hxa => absurd hpx (hxa.symm ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_index [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g = ∏ x ∈ (f.filter p).support, g x (f x) := by
classical
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [support_filter, Finset.mem_filter] at hx
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ hx.2]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g * (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g = f.prod g := by
classical simp_rw [prod_filter_index, support_filter, Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not,
Finsupp.prod]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_prod_filter [CommGroup G] (g : α → M → G) :
f.prod g / (f.filter p).prod g = (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not _ _ _).symm
end Zero
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [AddZeroClass M] (f : α →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter p + f.filter fun a => ¬p a) = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [coe_add, filter_eq_indicator]
exact Set.indicator_self_add_compl { x | p x } f
end Filter
/-! ### Declarations about `frange` -/
section Frange
variable [Zero M]
/-- `frange f` is the image of `f` on the support of `f`. -/
def frange (f : α →₀ M) : Finset M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
Finset.image f f.support
theorem mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} {y : M} : y ∈ f.frange ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ x, f x = y := by
rw [frange, @Finset.mem_image _ _ (Classical.decEq _) _ f.support]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ => ⟨hx2 ▸ mem_support_iff.1 hx1, x, hx2⟩, fun ⟨hy, x, hx⟩ =>
⟨x, mem_support_iff.2 (hx.symm ▸ hy), hx⟩⟩
theorem zero_not_mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} : (0 : M) ∉ f.frange := fun H => (mem_frange.1 H).1 rfl
theorem frange_single {x : α} {y : M} : frange (single x y) ⊆ {y} := fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_frange.1 hr
ht2 ▸ by
classical
rw [single_apply] at ht2 ⊢
split_ifs at ht2 ⊢
· exact Finset.mem_singleton_self _
· exact (t ht2.symm).elim
end Frange
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.subtypeDomain` -/
section SubtypeDomain
section Zero
variable [Zero M] {p : α → Prop}
/--
`subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function `f` to subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain (p : α → Prop) (f : α →₀ M) : Subtype p →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decPred p
f.support.subtype p
toFun := f ∘ Subtype.val
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [@mem_subtype _ _ (Classical.decPred p), mem_support_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_subtypeDomain [D : DecidablePred p] {f : α →₀ M} :
(subtypeDomain p f).support = f.support.subtype p := by rw [Subsingleton.elim D] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply {a : Subtype p} {v : α →₀ M} : (subtypeDomain p v) a = v a.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero : subtypeDomain p (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall {f g : α →₀ M} :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = g x := by
simp_rw [DFunLike.ext_iff, subtypeDomain_apply, Subtype.forall]
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff {f g : α →₀ M}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ g.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ f = g :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall.trans
⟨fun H ↦ Finsupp.ext fun _a ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hf _ ·) fun haf ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hg _ ·)
fun hag ↦ (not_mem_support_iff.mp haf).trans (not_mem_support_iff.mp hag).symm,
fun H _ _ ↦ congr($H _)⟩
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff' {f : α →₀ M} : f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall (g := 0)
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff {f : α →₀ M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff (g := 0) hf (by simp)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtypeDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {v : α →₀ M} {h : α → M → N}
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) : (v.subtypeDomain p).prod (fun a b ↦ h a b) = v.prod h := by
refine Finset.prod_bij (fun p _ ↦ p) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ M}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p + v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- `subtypeDomain` but as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ M) →+ Subtype p →₀ M where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_zero' := subtypeDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := subtypeDomain_add
/-- `Finsupp.filter` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def filterAddHom (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun := filter p
map_zero' := filter_zero p
map_add' f g := DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [filter_eq_indicator, coe_add]
exact Set.indicator_add { x | p x } f g
@[simp]
theorem filter_add [DecidablePred p] {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').filter p = v.filter p + v'.filter p :=
(filterAddHom p).map_add v v'
end AddZeroClass
section CommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {p : α → Prop}
theorem subtypeDomain_sum {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} :
(∑ c ∈ s, h c).subtypeDomain p = ∑ c ∈ s, (h c).subtypeDomain p :=
map_sum subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom _ s
theorem subtypeDomain_finsupp_sum [Zero N] {s : β →₀ N} {h : β → N → α →₀ M} :
(s.sum h).subtypeDomain p = s.sum fun c d => (h c d).subtypeDomain p :=
subtypeDomain_sum
theorem filter_sum [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α →₀ M) :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a).filter p = ∑ a ∈ s, filter p (f a) :=
map_sum (filterAddHom p) f s
theorem filter_eq_sum (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) :
f.filter p = ∑ i ∈ f.support.filter p, single i (f i) :=
(f.filter p).sum_single.symm.trans <|
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => by
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
end CommMonoid
section Group
variable [AddGroup G] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ G}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_neg : (-v).subtypeDomain p = -v.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_sub : (v - v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p - v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem filter_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ G) : filter p (-f) = -filter p f :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_neg f
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ G) :
filter p (f₁ - f₂) = filter p f₁ - filter p f₂ :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_sub f₁ f₂
end Group
end SubtypeDomain
theorem mem_support_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Multiset (α →₀ M)} (a : α) :
a ∈ s.sum.support → ∃ f ∈ s, a ∈ (f : α →₀ M).support :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun h => False.elim (by simp at h))
(by
intro f s ih ha
by_cases h : a ∈ f.support
· exact ⟨f, Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
· simp only [Multiset.sum_cons, mem_support_iff, add_apply, not_mem_support_iff.1 h,
zero_add] at ha
rcases ih (mem_support_iff.2 ha) with ⟨f', h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨f', Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem h₀, h₁⟩)
theorem mem_support_finset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} (a : α)
(ha : a ∈ (∑ c ∈ s, h c).support) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ∈ (h c).support :=
let ⟨_, hf, hfa⟩ := mem_support_multiset_sum a ha
let ⟨c, hc, Eq⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.1 hf
⟨c, hc, Eq.symm ▸ hfa⟩
/-! ### Declarations about `curry` and `uncurry` -/
section CurryUncurry
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N]
/-- Given a finitely supported function `f` from a product type `α × β` to `γ`,
`curry f` is the "curried" finitely supported function from `α` to the type of
finitely supported functions from `β` to `γ`. -/
protected def curry (f : α × β →₀ M) : α →₀ β →₀ M :=
f.sum fun p c => single p.1 (single p.2 c)
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : α × β →₀ M) (x : α) (y : β) : f.curry x y = f (x, y) := by
classical
have : ∀ b : α × β, single b.fst (single b.snd (f b)) x y = if b = (x, y) then f b else 0 := by
rintro ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
simp only [ne_eq, single_apply, Prod.ext_iff, ite_and]
split_ifs <;> simp [single_apply, *]
rw [Finsupp.curry, sum_apply, sum_apply, sum_eq_single, this, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ b_ne
rw [this b, if_neg b_ne]
· intro _
rw [single_zero, single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem sum_curry_index (f : α × β →₀ M) (g : α → β → M → N) (hg₀ : ∀ a b, g a b 0 = 0)
(hg₁ : ∀ a b c₀ c₁, g a b (c₀ + c₁) = g a b c₀ + g a b c₁) :
(f.curry.sum fun a f => f.sum (g a)) = f.sum fun p c => g p.1 p.2 c := by
rw [Finsupp.curry]
trans
· exact
sum_sum_index (fun a => sum_zero_index) fun a b₀ b₁ =>
sum_add_index' (fun a => hg₀ _ _) fun c d₀ d₁ => hg₁ _ _ _ _
congr; funext p c
trans
· exact sum_single_index sum_zero_index
exact sum_single_index (hg₀ _ _)
/-- Given a finitely supported function `f` from `α` to the type of
finitely supported functions from `β` to `M`,
`uncurry f` is the "uncurried" finitely supported function from `α × β` to `M`. -/
protected def uncurry (f : α →₀ β →₀ M) : α × β →₀ M :=
f.sum fun a g => g.sum fun b c => single (a, b) c
@[simp]
protected theorem uncurry_apply_pair (f : α →₀ β →₀ M) (x : α) (y : β) :
f.uncurry (x, y) = f x y := by
rw [← curry_apply (f.uncurry) x y]
simp only [Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.uncurry, sum_sum_index, single_zero, single_add,
forall_true_iff, sum_single_index, single_zero, ← single_sum, sum_single]
@[simp]
theorem curry_uncurry (f : α →₀ β →₀ M) : f.uncurry.curry = f := by
ext a b
rw [curry_apply, Finsupp.uncurry_apply_pair]
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_curry (f : α × β →₀ M) : f.curry.uncurry = f := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
rw [Finsupp.uncurry_apply_pair, curry_apply]
/-- `finsuppProdEquiv` defines the `Equiv` between `((α × β) →₀ M)` and `(α →₀ (β →₀ M))` given by
currying and uncurrying. -/
def finsuppProdEquiv : (α × β →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ β →₀ M) where
toFun := Finsupp.curry
invFun := Finsupp.uncurry
left_inv := uncurry_curry
right_inv := curry_uncurry
theorem filter_curry (f : α × β →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter fun a : α × β => p a.1).curry = f.curry.filter p := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.curry, Finsupp.sum, Finsupp.sum, filter_sum, support_filter,
sum_filter]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl ?_
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ _
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_apply_pos, filter_single_of_pos] <;> exact h
· rwa [filter_single_of_neg]
theorem support_curry [DecidableEq α] (f : α × β →₀ M) :
f.curry.support ⊆ f.support.image Prod.fst := by
rw [← Finset.biUnion_singleton]
refine Finset.Subset.trans support_sum ?_
exact Finset.biUnion_mono fun a _ => support_single_subset
end CurryUncurry
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is a `Sum` type -/
section Sum
/-- `Finsupp.sumElim f g` maps `inl x` to `f x` and `inr y` to `g y`. -/
@[simps support]
def sumElim {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) : α ⊕ β →₀ γ where
support := f.support.disjSum g.support
toFun := Sum.elim f g
mem_support_toFun := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sumElim {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) :
⇑(sumElim f g) = Sum.elim f g :=
rfl
theorem sumElim_apply {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : α ⊕ β) :
sumElim f g x = Sum.elim f g x :=
rfl
theorem sumElim_inl {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : α) :
sumElim f g (Sum.inl x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem sumElim_inr {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α →₀ γ) (g : β →₀ γ) (x : β) :
sumElim f g (Sum.inr x) = g x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sumElim {ι₁ ι₂ α M : Type*} [Zero α] [CommMonoid M]
(f₁ : ι₁ →₀ α) (f₂ : ι₂ →₀ α) (g : ι₁ ⊕ ι₂ → α → M) :
(f₁.sumElim f₂).prod g = f₁.prod (g ∘ Sum.inl) * f₂.prod (g ∘ Sum.inr) := by
simp [Finsupp.prod, Finset.prod_disj_sum]
/-- The equivalence between `(α ⊕ β) →₀ γ` and `(α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ)`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] : (α ⊕ β →₀ γ) ≃ (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ) where
toFun f :=
⟨f.comapDomain Sum.inl Sum.inl_injective.injOn,
f.comapDomain Sum.inr Sum.inr_injective.injOn⟩
invFun fg := sumElim fg.1 fg.2
left_inv f := by
ext ab
rcases ab with a | b <;> simp
right_inv fg := by ext <;> simp
theorem fst_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α ⊕ β →₀ γ) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp f).1 x = f (Sum.inl x) :=
rfl
theorem snd_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (f : α ⊕ β →₀ γ) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp f).2 y = f (Sum.inr y) :=
rfl
theorem sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (fg : (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ))
(x : α) : (sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inl x) = fg.1 x :=
rfl
theorem sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr {α β γ : Type*} [Zero γ] (fg : (α →₀ γ) × (β →₀ γ))
(y : β) : (sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inr y) = fg.2 y :=
rfl
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- The additive equivalence between `(α ⊕ β) →₀ M` and `(α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow`. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} : (α ⊕ β →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M) :=
{ sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp with
map_add' := by
intros
ext <;>
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Prod.fst_add, Prod.snd_add, add_apply,
snd_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp, fst_sumFinsuppEquivProdFinsupp] }
theorem fst_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} (f : α ⊕ β →₀ M) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp f).1 x = f (Sum.inl x) :=
rfl
theorem snd_sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp {α β : Type*} (f : α ⊕ β →₀ M) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp f).2 y = f (Sum.inr y) :=
rfl
theorem sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inl {α β : Type*} (fg : (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)) (x : α) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inl x) = fg.1 x :=
rfl
theorem sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp_symm_inr {α β : Type*} (fg : (α →₀ M) × (β →₀ M)) (y : β) :
(sumFinsuppAddEquivProdFinsupp.symm fg) (Sum.inr y) = fg.2 y :=
rfl
end Sum
section
variable [Zero R]
/-- The `Finsupp` version of `Pi.unique`. -/
instance uniqueOfRight [Subsingleton R] : Unique (α →₀ R) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
/-- The `Finsupp` version of `Pi.uniqueOfIsEmpty`. -/
instance uniqueOfLeft [IsEmpty α] : Unique (α →₀ R) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
end
section
variable {M : Type*} [Zero M] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P]
/-- Combine finitely supported functions over `{a // P a}` and `{a // ¬P a}`, by case-splitting on
`P a`. -/
@[simps]
def piecewise (f : Subtype P →₀ M) (g : {a // ¬ P a} →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if h : P a then f ⟨a, h⟩ else g ⟨a, h⟩
support := (f.support.map (.subtype _)).disjUnion (g.support.map (.subtype _)) <| by
simp_rw [Finset.disjoint_left, mem_map, forall_exists_index, Embedding.coe_subtype,
Subtype.forall, Subtype.exists]
rintro _ a ha ⟨-, rfl⟩ ⟨b, hb, -, rfl⟩
exact hb ha
mem_support_toFun a := by
by_cases ha : P a <;> simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_piecewise (f : Subtype P →₀ M) (g : {a // ¬ P a} →₀ M) :
subtypeDomain P (f.piecewise g) = f :=
Finsupp.ext fun a => dif_pos a.prop
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_not_piecewise (f : Subtype P →₀ M) (g : {a // ¬ P a} →₀ M) :
subtypeDomain (¬P ·) (f.piecewise g) = g :=
Finsupp.ext fun a => dif_neg a.prop
/-- Extend the domain of a `Finsupp` by using `0` where `P x` does not hold. -/
@[simps! support toFun]
def extendDomain (f : Subtype P →₀ M) : α →₀ M := piecewise f 0
theorem extendDomain_eq_embDomain_subtype (f : Subtype P →₀ M) :
extendDomain f = embDomain (.subtype _) f := by
ext a
by_cases h : P a
· refine Eq.trans ?_ (embDomain_apply (.subtype P) f (Subtype.mk a h)).symm
simp [h]
· rw [embDomain_notin_range, extendDomain_toFun, dif_neg h]
simp [h]
theorem support_extendDomain_subset (f : Subtype P →₀ M) :
↑(f.extendDomain).support ⊆ {x | P x} := by
intro x
rw [extendDomain_support, mem_coe, mem_map, Embedding.coe_subtype]
rintro ⟨x, -, rfl⟩
exact x.prop
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_extendDomain (f : Subtype P →₀ M) :
subtypeDomain P f.extendDomain = f :=
subtypeDomain_piecewise _ _
theorem extendDomain_subtypeDomain (f : α →₀ M) (hf : ∀ a ∈ f.support, P a) :
(subtypeDomain P f).extendDomain = f := by
ext a
by_cases h : P a
· exact dif_pos h
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-06-18
this `rw` was done by `dsimp`. -/
rw [extendDomain_toFun]
dsimp
rw [if_neg h, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support_iff]
refine mt ?_ h
exact @hf _
@[simp]
theorem extendDomain_single (a : Subtype P) (m : M) :
(single a m).extendDomain = single a.val m := by
ext a'
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-06-18
this `rw` was instead `dsimp only`. -/
rw [extendDomain_toFun]
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a.val a'
· simp_rw [single_eq_same, dif_pos a.prop]
· simp_rw [single_eq_of_ne ha, dite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
rw [single_eq_of_ne]
simp [Subtype.ext_iff, ha]
end
/-- Given an `AddCommMonoid M` and `s : Set α`, `restrictSupportEquiv s M` is the `Equiv`
between the subtype of finitely supported functions with support contained in `s` and
the type of finitely supported functions from `s`. -/
-- TODO: add [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] as an assumption
@[simps] def restrictSupportEquiv (s : Set α) (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] :
{ f : α →₀ M // ↑f.support ⊆ s } ≃ (s →₀ M) where
toFun f := subtypeDomain (· ∈ s) f.1
invFun f := letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s); ⟨f.extendDomain, support_extendDomain_subset _⟩
left_inv f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s); Subtype.ext <| extendDomain_subtypeDomain f.1 f.prop
right_inv _ := letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s); subtypeDomain_extendDomain _
/-- Given `AddCommMonoid M` and `e : α ≃ β`, `domCongr e` is the corresponding `Equiv` between
`α →₀ M` and `β →₀ M`.
This is `Finsupp.equivCongrLeft` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
protected def domCongr [AddCommMonoid M] (e : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (β →₀ M) where
toFun := equivMapDomain e
invFun := equivMapDomain e.symm
left_inv v := by
simp only [← equivMapDomain_trans, Equiv.self_trans_symm]
exact equivMapDomain_refl _
right_inv := by
intro v
simp only [← equivMapDomain_trans, Equiv.symm_trans_self]
exact equivMapDomain_refl _
map_add' a b := by simp only [equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain]; exact mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem domCongr_refl [AddCommMonoid M] :
Finsupp.domCongr (Equiv.refl α) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_refl _
@[simp]
theorem domCongr_symm [AddCommMonoid M] (e : α ≃ β) :
(Finsupp.domCongr e).symm = (Finsupp.domCongr e.symm : (β →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ M)) :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem domCongr_trans [AddCommMonoid M] (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ) :
(Finsupp.domCongr e).trans (Finsupp.domCongr f) =
(Finsupp.domCongr (e.trans f) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ _) :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => (equivMapDomain_trans _ _ _).symm
end Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about sigma types -/
section Sigma
variable {αs : ι → Type*} [Zero M] (l : (Σ i, αs i) →₀ M)
/-- Given `l`, a finitely supported function from the sigma type `Σ (i : ι), αs i` to `M` and
an index element `i : ι`, `split l i` is the `i`th component of `l`,
a finitely supported function from `as i` to `M`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Sigma.curry`.
-/
def split (i : ι) : αs i →₀ M :=
l.comapDomain (Sigma.mk i) fun _ _ _ _ hx => heq_iff_eq.1 (Sigma.mk.inj hx).2
theorem split_apply (i : ι) (x : αs i) : split l i x = l ⟨i, x⟩ := by
dsimp only [split]
rw [comapDomain_apply]
/-- Given `l`, a finitely supported function from the sigma type `Σ (i : ι), αs i` to `β`,
`split_support l` is the finset of indices in `ι` that appear in the support of `l`. -/
def splitSupport (l : (Σ i, αs i) →₀ M) : Finset ι :=
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
l.support.image Sigma.fst
theorem mem_splitSupport_iff_nonzero (i : ι) : i ∈ splitSupport l ↔ split l i ≠ 0 := by
classical rw [splitSupport, mem_image, Ne, ← support_eq_empty, ← Ne,
← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, split, comapDomain, Finset.Nonempty]
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_preimage, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, mem_support_iff,
Sigma.exists, Ne]
/-- Given `l`, a finitely supported function from the sigma type `Σ i, αs i` to `β` and
an `ι`-indexed family `g` of functions from `(αs i →₀ β)` to `γ`, `split_comp` defines a
finitely supported function from the index type `ι` to `γ` given by composing `g i` with
`split l i`. -/
def splitComp [Zero N] (g : ∀ i, (αs i →₀ M) → N) (hg : ∀ i x, x = 0 ↔ g i x = 0) : ι →₀ N where
support := splitSupport l
toFun i := g i (split l i)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro i
rw [mem_splitSupport_iff_nonzero, not_iff_not, hg]
theorem sigma_support : l.support = l.splitSupport.sigma fun i => (l.split i).support := by
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, splitSupport, split, comapDomain, mem_image, mem_preimage,
Sigma.forall, mem_sigma]
tauto
theorem sigma_sum [AddCommMonoid N] (f : (Σ i : ι, αs i) → M → N) :
l.sum f = ∑ i ∈ splitSupport l, (split l i).sum fun (a : αs i) b => f ⟨i, a⟩ b := by
simp only [sum, sigma_support, sum_sigma, split_apply]
variable {η : Type*} [Fintype η] {ιs : η → Type*} [Zero α]
/-- On a `Fintype η`, `Finsupp.split` is an equivalence between `(Σ (j : η), ιs j) →₀ α`
and `Π j, (ιs j →₀ α)`.
This is the `Finsupp` version of `Equiv.Pi_curry`. -/
noncomputable def sigmaFinsuppEquivPiFinsupp : ((Σ j, ιs j) →₀ α) ≃ ∀ j, ιs j →₀ α where
toFun := split
invFun f :=
onFinset (Finset.univ.sigma fun j => (f j).support) (fun ji => f ji.1 ji.2) fun _ hg =>
Finset.mem_sigma.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_univ _, mem_support_iff.mpr hg⟩
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [split]
right_inv f := by
ext
simp [split]
@[simp]
theorem sigmaFinsuppEquivPiFinsupp_apply (f : (Σ j, ιs j) →₀ α) (j i) :
sigmaFinsuppEquivPiFinsupp f j i = f ⟨j, i⟩ :=
rfl
/-- On a `Fintype η`, `Finsupp.split` is an additive equivalence between
`(Σ (j : η), ιs j) →₀ α` and `Π j, (ιs j →₀ α)`.
This is the `AddEquiv` version of `Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppEquivPiFinsupp`.
-/
noncomputable def sigmaFinsuppAddEquivPiFinsupp {α : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*} [AddMonoid α] :
((Σ j, ιs j) →₀ α) ≃+ ∀ j, ιs j →₀ α :=
{ sigmaFinsuppEquivPiFinsupp with
map_add' := fun f g => by
ext
simp }
@[simp]
theorem sigmaFinsuppAddEquivPiFinsupp_apply {α : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*} [AddMonoid α]
(f : (Σ j, ιs j) →₀ α) (j i) : sigmaFinsuppAddEquivPiFinsupp f j i = f ⟨j, i⟩ :=
rfl
end Sigma
end Finsupp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 1,878 | 1,880 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
### Locally finite families of sets
We say that a family of sets in a topological space is *locally finite* if at every point `x : X`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family.
In this file we give the definition and prove basic properties of locally finite families of sets.
-/
-- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)]
open Set Function Filter Topology
variable {ι ι' α X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f g : ι → Set X}
/-- A family of sets in `Set X` is locally finite if at every point `x : X`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family. -/
def LocallyFinite (f : ι → Set X) :=
∀ x : X, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, { i | (f i ∩ t).Nonempty }.Finite
theorem locallyFinite_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) : LocallyFinite f := fun _ =>
⟨univ, univ_mem, toFinite _⟩
namespace LocallyFinite
theorem point_finite (hf : LocallyFinite f) (x : X) : { b | x ∈ f b }.Finite :=
let ⟨_t, hxt, ht⟩ := hf x
ht.subset fun _b hb => ⟨x, hb, mem_of_mem_nhds hxt⟩
protected theorem subset (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : ∀ i, g i ⊆ f i) : LocallyFinite g := fun a =>
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf a
⟨t, ht₁, ht₂.subset fun i hi => hi.mono <| inter_subset_inter (hg i) Subset.rfl⟩
theorem comp_injOn {g : ι' → ι} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : InjOn g { i | (f (g i)).Nonempty }) :
LocallyFinite (f ∘ g) := fun x => by
let ⟨t, htx, htf⟩ := hf x
refine ⟨t, htx, htf.preimage <| ?_⟩
exact hg.mono fun i (hi : Set.Nonempty _) => hi.left
| theorem comp_injective {g : ι' → ι} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : Injective g) :
LocallyFinite (f ∘ g) :=
hf.comp_injOn hg.injOn
theorem _root_.locallyFinite_iff_smallSets :
| Mathlib/Topology/LocallyFinite.lean | 47 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Homogeneous
/-!
# The universal characteristic polynomial
In this file we define the universal characteristic polynomial `Matrix.charpoly.univ`,
which is the charactistic polynomial of the matrix with entries `Xᵢⱼ`,
and hence has coefficients that are multivariate polynomials.
It is universal in the sense that one obtains the characteristic polynomial of a matrix `M`
by evaluating the coefficients of `univ` at the entries of `M`.
We use it to show that the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial
of a matrix are homogeneous polynomials in the matrix entries.
## Main results
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ`: the universal characteristic polynomial
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ_map_eval₂Hom`: evaluating `univ` on the entries of a matrix `M`
gives the characteristic polynomial of `M`.
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ_coeff_isHomogeneous`:
the `i`-th coefficient of `univ` is a homogeneous polynomial of degree `n - i`.
-/
namespace Matrix.charpoly
variable {R S : Type*} (n : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable (f : R →+* S)
variable (R) in
/-- The universal characteristic polynomial for `n × n`-matrices,
is the charactistic polynomial of `Matrix.mvPolynomialX n n ℤ` with entries `Xᵢⱼ`.
Its `i`-th coefficient is a homogeneous polynomial of degree `n - i`,
see `Matrix.charpoly.univ_coeff_isHomogeneous`.
By evaluating the coefficients at the entries of a matrix `M`,
one obtains the characteristic polynomial of `M`,
see `Matrix.charpoly.univ_map_eval₂Hom`. -/
noncomputable
abbrev univ : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (n × n) R) :=
charpoly <| mvPolynomialX n n R
open MvPolynomial RingHomClass in
@[simp]
lemma univ_map_eval₂Hom (M : n × n → S) :
(univ R n).map (eval₂Hom f M) = charpoly (Matrix.of M.curry) := by
rw [univ, ← charpoly_map, coe_eval₂Hom, ← mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ f (Matrix.of M.curry)]
simp only [of_apply, Function.curry_apply, Prod.mk.eta]
lemma univ_map_map :
(univ R n).map (MvPolynomial.map f) = univ S n := by
rw [MvPolynomial.map, univ_map_eval₂Hom]; rfl
@[simp]
lemma univ_coeff_eval₂Hom (M : n × n → S) (i : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom f M ((univ R n).coeff i) =
(charpoly (Matrix.of M.curry)).coeff i := by
rw [← univ_map_eval₂Hom n f M, Polynomial.coeff_map]
variable (R)
lemma univ_monic : (univ R n).Monic := charpoly_monic (mvPolynomialX n n R)
lemma univ_natDegree [Nontrivial R] : (univ R n).natDegree = Fintype.card n :=
charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim (mvPolynomialX n n R)
@[simp]
lemma univ_coeff_card : (univ R n).coeff (Fintype.card n) = 1 := by
suffices Polynomial.coeff (univ ℤ n) (Fintype.card n) = 1 by
rw [← univ_map_map n (Int.castRingHom R), Polynomial.coeff_map, this, map_one]
rw [← univ_natDegree ℤ n]
exact (univ_monic ℤ n).leadingCoeff
open MvPolynomial in
lemma optionEquivLeft_symm_univ_isHomogeneous :
((optionEquivLeft R (n × n)).symm (univ R n)).IsHomogeneous (Fintype.card n) := by
have aux : Fintype.card n = 0 + ∑ i : n, 1 := by
| simp only [zero_add, Finset.sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Fintype.card]
simp only [aux, univ, charpoly, charmatrix, scalar_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, det_apply',
sub_apply, map_apply, of_apply, map_sum, map_mul, map_intCast, map_prod, map_sub,
optionEquivLeft_symm_apply, Polynomial.aevalTower_C, rename_X, diagonal, mvPolynomialX]
apply IsHomogeneous.sum
rintro i -
apply IsHomogeneous.mul
· apply isHomogeneous_C
· apply IsHomogeneous.prod
rintro j -
by_cases h : i j = j
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, Polynomial.aevalTower_X, IsHomogeneous.sub, isHomogeneous_X]
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, map_zero, zero_sub, (isHomogeneous_X _ _).neg]
lemma univ_coeff_isHomogeneous (i j : ℕ) (h : i + j = Fintype.card n) :
((univ R n).coeff i).IsHomogeneous j :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Univ.lean | 86 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.Ergodic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
/-!
# Functions invariant under (quasi)ergodic map
In this file we prove that an a.e. strongly measurable function `g : α → X`
that is a.e. invariant under a (quasi)ergodic map is a.e. equal to a constant.
We prove several versions of this statement with slightly different measurability assumptions.
We also formulate a version for `MeasureTheory.AEEqFun` functions
with all a.e. equalities replaced with equalities in the quotient space.
-/
open Function Set Filter MeasureTheory Topology TopologicalSpace
variable {α X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α}
/-- Let `f : α → α` be a (quasi)ergodic map. Let `g : α → X` is a null-measurable function
from `α` to a nonempty space with a countable family of measurable sets
separating points of a set `s` such that `f x ∈ s` for a.e. `x`.
If `g` that is a.e.-invariant under `f`, then `g` is a.e. constant. -/
theorem QuasiErgodic.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp_of_ae_range₀ [Nonempty X] [MeasurableSpace X]
{s : Set X} [MeasurableSpace.CountablySeparated s] {f : α → α} {g : α → X}
(h : QuasiErgodic f μ) (hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x ∈ s) (hgm : NullMeasurable g μ)
(hg_eq : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
∃ c, g =ᵐ[μ] const α c := by
refine exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating MeasurableSet hs ?_
refine fun U hU ↦ h.ae_mem_or_ae_nmem₀ (s := g ⁻¹' U) (hgm hU) ?_b
refine (hg_eq.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_).set_eq
rw [← preimage_comp, mem_preimage, mem_preimage, hx]
section CountableSeparatingOnUniv
variable [Nonempty X] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace.CountablySeparated X]
{f : α → α} {g : α → X}
/-- Let `f : α → α` be a (pre)ergodic map.
Let `g : α → X` be a measurable function from `α` to a nonempty measurable space
with a countable family of measurable sets separating the points of `X`.
If `g` is invariant under `f`, then `g` is a.e. constant. -/
theorem PreErgodic.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp (h : PreErgodic f μ) (hgm : Measurable g)
(hg_eq : g ∘ f = g) : ∃ c, g =ᵐ[μ] const α c :=
exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_forall_separating MeasurableSet fun U hU ↦
h.ae_mem_or_ae_nmem (s := g ⁻¹' U) (hgm hU) <| by rw [← preimage_comp, hg_eq]
/-- Let `f : α → α` be a quasi ergodic map.
Let `g : α → X` be a null-measurable function from `α` to a nonempty measurable space
with a countable family of measurable sets separating the points of `X`.
If `g` is a.e.-invariant under `f`, then `g` is a.e. constant. -/
theorem QuasiErgodic.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp₀ (h : QuasiErgodic f μ) (hgm : NullMeasurable g μ)
(hg_eq : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∃ c, g =ᵐ[μ] const α c :=
h.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp_of_ae_range₀ (s := univ) univ_mem hgm hg_eq
/-- Let `f : α → α` be an ergodic map.
Let `g : α → X` be a null-measurable function from `α` to a nonempty measurable space
with a countable family of measurable sets separating the points of `X`.
If `g` is a.e.-invariant under `f`, then `g` is a.e. constant. -/
theorem Ergodic.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp₀ (h : Ergodic f μ) (hgm : NullMeasurable g μ)
(hg_eq : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∃ c, g =ᵐ[μ] const α c :=
h.quasiErgodic.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp₀ hgm hg_eq
end CountableSeparatingOnUniv
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [MetrizableSpace X] [Nonempty X] {f : α → α}
namespace QuasiErgodic
/-- Let `f : α → α` be a quasi ergodic map.
Let `g : α → X` be an a.e. strongly measurable function
from `α` to a nonempty metrizable topological space.
If `g` is a.e.-invariant under `f`, then `g` is a.e. constant. -/
| theorem ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp_ae {g : α → X} (h : QuasiErgodic f μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hg_eq : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∃ c, g =ᵐ[μ] const α c := by
borelize X
rcases hgm.isSeparable_ae_range with ⟨t, ht, hgt⟩
haveI := ht.secondCountableTopology
exact h.ae_eq_const_of_ae_eq_comp_of_ae_range₀ hgt hgm.aemeasurable.nullMeasurable hg_eq
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/Function.lean | 77 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
| simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 356 | 360 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Contracting maps
A Lipschitz continuous self-map with Lipschitz constant `K < 1` is called a *contracting map*.
In this file we prove the Banach fixed point theorem, some explicit estimates on the rate
of convergence, and some properties of the map sending a contracting map to its fixed point.
## Main definitions
* `ContractingWith K f` : a Lipschitz continuous self-map with `K < 1`;
* `efixedPoint` : given a contracting map `f` on a complete emetric space and a point `x`
such that `edist x (f x) ≠ ∞`, `efixedPoint f hf x hx` is the unique fixed point of `f`
in `EMetric.ball x ∞`;
* `fixedPoint` : the unique fixed point of a contracting map on a complete nonempty metric space.
## Tags
contracting map, fixed point, Banach fixed point theorem
-/
open NNReal Topology ENNReal Filter Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A map is said to be `ContractingWith K`, if `K < 1` and `f` is `LipschitzWith K`. -/
def ContractingWith [EMetricSpace α] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → α) :=
K < 1 ∧ LipschitzWith K f
namespace ContractingWith
variable [EMetricSpace α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → α}
open EMetric Set
theorem toLipschitzWith (hf : ContractingWith K f) : LipschitzWith K f := hf.2
theorem one_sub_K_pos' (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 - K := by simp [hf.1]
theorem one_sub_K_ne_zero (hf : ContractingWith K f) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt hf.one_sub_K_pos'
theorem one_sub_K_ne_top : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - K ≠ ∞ := by
| norm_cast
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Contracting.lean | 53 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
theorem arccos_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arccos x = 0 := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_one_le hx, sub_self]
theorem arccos_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arccos x = π := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx, sub_neg_eq_add, add_halves]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem sin_arccos (x : ℝ) : sin (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arccos_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, sin_pi, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arccos_of_one_le hx₂.le, sin_zero, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
rw [arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_arcsin]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arccos x < π / 2 ↔ 0 < x := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_le_pi_div_four {x} : arccos x ≤ π / 4 ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [arccos, ← pi_div_four_le_arcsin]
constructor <;>
· intro
linarith
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arccos : Continuous arccos :=
continuous_const.sub continuous_arcsin
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arccos (x : ℝ) : tan (arccos x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) / x := by
rw [arccos, tan_pi_div_two_sub, tan_arcsin, inv_div]
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arccos_eq_arcsin {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arccos x = arcsin (√(1 - x ^ 2)) :=
(arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arccos _)
⟨(Left.neg_nonpos_iff.2 (div_nonneg pi_pos.le (by norm_num))).trans (arccos_nonneg _),
arccos_le_pi_div_two.2 h⟩).symm
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arcsin_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arcsin x = arccos (√(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw [eq_comm, ← cos_arcsin]
exact
arccos_cos (arcsin_nonneg.2 h)
((arcsin_le_pi_div_two _).trans (div_le_self pi_pos.le one_le_two))
end Real
open Real
/-!
### Convenience dot notation lemmas
-/
namespace Filter.Tendsto
variable {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ} {f : α → ℝ}
protected theorem arcsin (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arcsin x)) :=
(continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).comp h
| theorem arcsin_nhdsLE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≤] x)) :
Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≤] (arcsin x)) := by
refine ((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun y hy ↦ ?_).comp h
exact monotone_arcsin hy
theorem arcsin_nhdsGE (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[≥] x)) : Tendsto (arcsin <| f ·) l (𝓝[≥] (arcsin x)) :=
((continuous_arcsin.tendsto _).inf <| MapsTo.tendsto fun _ ↦ arcsin_le_arcsin).comp h
protected theorem arccos (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (arccos <| f ·) l (𝓝 (arccos x)) :=
(continuous_arccos.tendsto _).comp h
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 423 | 432 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
/-! ### Lemmas about arithmetic operations and intervals. -/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a c d : α}
/-! `inv_mem_Ixx_iff`, `sub_mem_Ixx_iff` -/
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_Icc_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ Set.Icc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Icc d⁻¹ c⁻¹ :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr inv_le' le_inv'
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_Ico_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ Set.Ico c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioc d⁻¹ c⁻¹ :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr inv_lt' le_inv'
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_Ioc_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ Set.Ioc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ico d⁻¹ c⁻¹ :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr inv_le' lt_inv'
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_Ioo_iff : a⁻¹ ∈ Set.Ioo c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioo d⁻¹ c⁻¹ :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr inv_lt' lt_inv'
end OrderedCommGroup
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
/-! `add_mem_Ixx_iff_left` -/
theorem add_mem_Icc_iff_left : a + b ∈ Set.Icc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Icc (c - b) (d - b) :=
(and_congr sub_le_iff_le_add le_sub_iff_add_le).symm
theorem add_mem_Ico_iff_left : a + b ∈ Set.Ico c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ico (c - b) (d - b) :=
(and_congr sub_le_iff_le_add lt_sub_iff_add_lt).symm
theorem add_mem_Ioc_iff_left : a + b ∈ Set.Ioc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioc (c - b) (d - b) :=
(and_congr sub_lt_iff_lt_add le_sub_iff_add_le).symm
theorem add_mem_Ioo_iff_left : a + b ∈ Set.Ioo c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioo (c - b) (d - b) :=
(and_congr sub_lt_iff_lt_add lt_sub_iff_add_lt).symm
/-! `add_mem_Ixx_iff_right` -/
theorem add_mem_Icc_iff_right : a + b ∈ Set.Icc c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Icc (c - a) (d - a) :=
(and_congr sub_le_iff_le_add' le_sub_iff_add_le').symm
theorem add_mem_Ico_iff_right : a + b ∈ Set.Ico c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico (c - a) (d - a) :=
(and_congr sub_le_iff_le_add' lt_sub_iff_add_lt').symm
theorem add_mem_Ioc_iff_right : a + b ∈ Set.Ioc c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc (c - a) (d - a) :=
(and_congr sub_lt_iff_lt_add' le_sub_iff_add_le').symm
theorem add_mem_Ioo_iff_right : a + b ∈ Set.Ioo c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioo (c - a) (d - a) :=
(and_congr sub_lt_iff_lt_add' lt_sub_iff_add_lt').symm
/-! `sub_mem_Ixx_iff_left` -/
theorem sub_mem_Icc_iff_left : a - b ∈ Set.Icc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Icc (c + b) (d + b) :=
and_congr le_sub_iff_add_le sub_le_iff_le_add
theorem sub_mem_Ico_iff_left : a - b ∈ Set.Ico c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ico (c + b) (d + b) :=
and_congr le_sub_iff_add_le sub_lt_iff_lt_add
theorem sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left : a - b ∈ Set.Ioc c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioc (c + b) (d + b) :=
and_congr lt_sub_iff_add_lt sub_le_iff_le_add
theorem sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left : a - b ∈ Set.Ioo c d ↔ a ∈ Set.Ioo (c + b) (d + b) :=
and_congr lt_sub_iff_add_lt sub_lt_iff_lt_add
/-! `sub_mem_Ixx_iff_right` -/
theorem sub_mem_Icc_iff_right : a - b ∈ Set.Icc c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Icc (a - d) (a - c) :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr sub_le_comm le_sub_comm
theorem sub_mem_Ico_iff_right : a - b ∈ Set.Ico c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc (a - d) (a - c) :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr sub_lt_comm le_sub_comm
theorem sub_mem_Ioc_iff_right : a - b ∈ Set.Ioc c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico (a - d) (a - c) :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr sub_le_comm lt_sub_comm
theorem sub_mem_Ioo_iff_right : a - b ∈ Set.Ioo c d ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioo (a - d) (a - c) :=
and_comm.trans <| and_congr sub_lt_comm lt_sub_comm
-- I think that symmetric intervals deserve attention and API: they arise all the time,
-- for instance when considering metric balls in `ℝ`.
theorem mem_Icc_iff_abs_le {R : Type*}
[AddCommGroup R] [LinearOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R] {x y z : R} :
|x - y| ≤ z ↔ y ∈ Icc (x - z) (x + z) :=
abs_le.trans <| and_comm.trans <| and_congr sub_le_comm neg_le_sub_iff_le_add
/-! `sub_mem_Ixx_zero_right` and `sub_mem_Ixx_zero_iff_right`; this specializes the previous
lemmas to the case of reflecting the interval. -/
theorem sub_mem_Icc_zero_iff_right : b - a ∈ Icc 0 b ↔ a ∈ Icc 0 b := by
simp only [sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem sub_mem_Ico_zero_iff_right : b - a ∈ Ico 0 b ↔ a ∈ Ioc 0 b := by
simp only [sub_mem_Ico_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem sub_mem_Ioc_zero_iff_right : b - a ∈ Ioc 0 b ↔ a ∈ Ico 0 b := by
simp only [sub_mem_Ioc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem sub_mem_Ioo_zero_iff_right : b - a ∈ Ioo 0 b ↔ a ∈ Ioo 0 b := by
simp only [sub_mem_Ioo_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
end OrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
/-- If we remove a smaller interval from a larger, the result is nonempty -/
theorem nonempty_Ico_sdiff {x dx y dy : α} (h : dy < dx) (hx : 0 < dx) :
Nonempty ↑(Ico x (x + dx) \ Ico y (y + dy)) := by
rcases lt_or_le x y with h' | h'
· use x
simp [*, not_le.2 h']
· use max x (x + dy)
simp [*, le_refl]
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-! ### Lemmas about disjointness of translates of intervals -/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section PairwiseDisjoint
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] (a b : α)
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_mul_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioc (a * b ^ n) (a * b ^ (n + 1))) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [Function.onFun]
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
intro m n hmn x hx
apply hmn
have hb : 1 < b := by
have : a * b ^ m < a * b ^ (m + 1) := hx.1.1.trans_le hx.1.2
rwa [mul_lt_mul_iff_left, ← mul_one (b ^ m), zpow_add_one, mul_lt_mul_iff_left] at this
have i1 := hx.1.1.trans_le hx.2.2
have i2 := hx.2.1.trans_le hx.1.2
rw [mul_lt_mul_iff_left, zpow_lt_zpow_iff_right hb, Int.lt_add_one_iff] at i1 i2
exact le_antisymm i1 i2
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ico_mul_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ico (a * b ^ n) (a * b ^ (n + 1))) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [Function.onFun]
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
intro m n hmn x hx
apply hmn
have hb : 1 < b := by
have : a * b ^ m < a * b ^ (m + 1) := hx.1.1.trans_lt hx.1.2
rwa [mul_lt_mul_iff_left, ← mul_one (b ^ m), zpow_add_one, mul_lt_mul_iff_left] at this
have i1 := hx.1.1.trans_lt hx.2.2
have i2 := hx.2.1.trans_lt hx.1.2
rw [mul_lt_mul_iff_left, zpow_lt_zpow_iff_right hb, Int.lt_add_one_iff] at i1 i2
exact le_antisymm i1 i2
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_mul_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioo (a * b ^ n) (a * b ^ (n + 1))) := fun _ _ hmn =>
(pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_mul_zpow a b hmn).mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioc (b ^ n) (b ^ (n + 1))) := by
simpa only [one_mul] using pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_mul_zpow 1 b
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ico_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ico (b ^ n) (b ^ (n + 1))) := by
simpa only [one_mul] using pairwise_disjoint_Ico_mul_zpow 1 b
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_zpow :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioo (b ^ n) (b ^ (n + 1))) := by
simpa only [one_mul] using pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_mul_zpow 1 b
end OrderedCommGroup
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] (a : α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_add_intCast :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioc (a + n) (a + n + 1)) := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_add_zsmul a (1 : α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ico_add_intCast :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ico (a + n) (a + n + 1)) := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
pairwise_disjoint_Ico_add_zsmul a (1 : α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_add_intCast :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioo (a + n) (a + n + 1)) := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_add_zsmul a (1 : α)
variable (α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ico_intCast :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ico (n : α) (n + 1)) := by
simpa only [zero_add] using pairwise_disjoint_Ico_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_intCast : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioo (n : α) (n + 1)) :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using pairwise_disjoint_Ioo_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_intCast : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n : ℤ => Ioc (n : α) (n + 1)) :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using pairwise_disjoint_Ioc_add_intCast (0 : α)
end OrderedRing
end PairwiseDisjoint
end Set
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Set/Group.lean | 267 | 269 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
filter_subset _ _
theorem norm_of_mem_sphere {x : Fin n → ℕ} (hx : x ∈ sphere n d k) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)‖ = √↑k := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq]
dsimp
simp_rw [abs_cast, ← cast_pow, ← cast_sum, (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
theorem sphere_subset_preimage_metric_sphere : (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) ⊆
(fun x : Fin n → ℕ => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)) ⁻¹'
Metric.sphere (0 : PiLp 2 fun _ : Fin n => ℝ) (√↑k) :=
| fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_of_mem_sphere hx]
/-- The map that appears in Behrend's bound on Roth numbers. -/
@[simps]
def map (d : ℕ) : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ ℕ where
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 125 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Egorov theorem
This file contains the Egorov theorem which states that an almost everywhere convergent
sequence on a finite measure space converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
This theorem is useful for the Vitali convergence theorem as well as theorems regarding
convergence in measure.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto`: Egorov's theorem which shows that a sequence of
almost everywhere convergent functions converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MetricSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
namespace Egorov
/-- Given a sequence of functions `f` and a function `g`, `notConvergentSeq f g n j` is the
set of elements such that `f k x` and `g x` are separated by at least `1 / (n + 1)` for some
`k ≥ j`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def notConvergentSeq [Preorder ι] (f : ι → α → β) (g : α → β) (n : ℕ) (j : ι) : Set α :=
⋃ (k) (_ : j ≤ k), { x | 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) }
variable {n : ℕ} {j : ι} {s : Set α} {ε : ℝ} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem mem_notConvergentSeq_iff [Preorder ι] {x : α} :
x ∈ notConvergentSeq f g n j ↔ ∃ k ≥ j, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) := by
simp_rw [notConvergentSeq, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_setOf]
theorem notConvergentSeq_antitone [Preorder ι] : Antitone (notConvergentSeq f g n) :=
fun _ _ hjk => Set.iUnion₂_mono' fun l hl => ⟨l, le_trans hjk hl, Set.Subset.rfl⟩
theorem measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
μ (s ∩ ⋂ j, notConvergentSeq f g n j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_atTop, ae_iff] at hfg
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← hfg]
refine measure_mono fun x => ?_
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, mem_notConvergentSeq_iff]
push_neg
rintro ⟨hmem, hx⟩
refine ⟨hmem, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ), Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat, fun N => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩ := hx N
exact ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂.le⟩
theorem notConvergentSeq_measurableSet [Preorder ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable[m] (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
MeasurableSet (notConvergentSeq f g n j) :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ =>
StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_lt stronglyMeasurable_const <| (hf k).dist hg
theorem measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· have : (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) = fun j => 0 := by
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [this]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
rw [← measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero hfg n, Set.inter_iInter]
refine tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop
(fun n ↦ (hsm.inter <| notConvergentSeq_measurableSet hf hg).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun k l hkl => Set.inter_subset_inter_right _ <| notConvergentSeq_antitone hkl)
⟨h.some, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hs (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)⟩
variable [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
theorem exists_notConvergentSeq_lt (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
∃ j : ι, μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n) := by
have ⟨N, hN⟩ := (ENNReal.tendsto_atTop ENNReal.zero_ne_top).1
(measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero hf hg hsm hs hfg n) (ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n)) (by
rw [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact mul_pos hε (pow_pos (by norm_num) n))
| rw [zero_add] at hN
exact ⟨N, (hN N le_rfl).2⟩
/-- Given some `ε > 0`, `notConvergentSeqLTIndex` provides the index such that
`notConvergentSeq` (intersected with a set of finite measure) has measure less than
`ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def notConvergentSeqLTIndex (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Egorov.lean | 98 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (monomial 0) add fun n a _h =>
by rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; exact monomial _ _
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem support_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.erase n) = (support p).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [support, erase_def, Finsupp.support_erase]
theorem monomial_add_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : monomial n (coeff p n) + p.erase n = p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_erase, coeff]
exact Finsupp.single_add_erase _ _
theorem coeff_erase (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) :
(p.erase n).coeff i = if i = n then 0 else p.coeff i := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def, coeff]
exact ite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem erase_zero (n : ℕ) : (0 : R[X]).erase n = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_monomial {n : ℕ} {a : R} : erase n (monomial n a) = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.erase n) n = 0 := by simp [coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem erase_ne (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) (h : i ≠ n) : coeff (p.erase n) i = coeff p i := by
simp [coeff_erase, h]
section Update
/-- Replace the coefficient of a `p : R[X]` at a given degree `n : ℕ`
by a given value `a : R`. If `a = 0`, this is equal to `p.erase n`
If `p.natDegree < n` and `a ≠ 0`, this increases the degree to `n`. -/
def update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.ofFinsupp (p.toFinsupp.update n a)
theorem coeff_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(p.update n a).coeff = Function.update p.coeff n a := by
ext
cases p
simp only [coeff, update, Function.update_apply, coe_update]
theorem coeff_update_apply (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) (i : ℕ) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = if i = n then a else p.coeff i := by
rw [coeff_update, Function.update_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_update_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (p.update n a).coeff n = a := by
rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_update_ne (p : R[X]) {n : ℕ} (a : R) {i : ℕ} (h : i ≠ n) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = p.coeff i := by rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem update_zero_eq_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : p.update n 0 = p.erase n := by
ext
rw [coeff_update_apply, coeff_erase]
theorem support_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) [Decidable (a = 0)] :
support (p.update n a) = if a = 0 then p.support.erase n else insert n p.support := by
classical
cases p
simp only [support, update, Finsupp.support_update]
congr
theorem support_update_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.update n 0) = p.support.erase n := by
rw [update_zero_eq_erase, support_erase]
theorem support_update_ne_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
support (p.update n a) = insert n p.support := by classical rw [support_update, if_neg ha]
end Update
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : R[X]) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image (fun n => p.coeff n) p.support
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : R[X]) = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem mem_coeffs_iff {p : R[X]} {c : R} : c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
theorem coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : R[X]) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
simp_rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
theorem coeff_mem_coeffs (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.coeff n ∈ p.coeffs := by
classical
simp only [coeffs, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_image, Ne]
exact ⟨n, h, rfl⟩
theorem coeffs_monomial (n : ℕ) {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (monomial n c).coeffs = {c} := by
rw [coeffs, support_monomial n hc]
simp
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% { Function.Injective.commSemigroup toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_mul with
toSemiring := Polynomial.semiring }
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
instance instZSMul : SMul ℤ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zsmul (a : ℤ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zsmul (a : ℤ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
instance instIntCast : IntCast R[X] where intCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : R[X]) = z := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : R[X]).toFinsupp = z := rfl
instance ring : Ring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.ring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective (toFinsupp_zero (R := R))
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add
toFinsupp_mul toFinsupp_neg toFinsupp_sub (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _)
(fun _ _ => toFinsupp_zsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_neg (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (-p) n = -coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg, coeff, coeff, Finsupp.neg_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sub (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p - q) n = coeff p n - coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rcases q with ⟨⟩
rw [← ofFinsupp_sub, coeff, coeff, coeff, Finsupp.sub_apply]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_neg (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial n (-a) = -monomial n a := by
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← monomial_add, neg_add_cancel, monomial_zero_right]
theorem monomial_sub (n : ℕ) : monomial n (a - b) = monomial n a - monomial n b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, monomial_add, monomial_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem support_neg {p : R[X]} : (-p).support = p.support := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg, support, support, Finsupp.support_neg]
theorem C_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : C (n : R) = n := by simp
theorem C_neg : C (-a) = -C a :=
RingHom.map_neg C a
theorem C_sub : C (a - b) = C a - C b :=
RingHom.map_sub C a b
end Ring
| instance commRing [CommRing R] : CommRing R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7432
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,133 | 1,134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Pseudo.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Products of pseudometric spaces and other constructions
This file constructs the supremum distance on binary products of pseudometric spaces and provides
instances for type synonyms.
-/
open Bornology Filter Metric Set Topology
open scoped NNReal
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- Pseudometric space structure pulled back by a function. -/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoMetricSpace β) :
PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist x y := dist (f x) (f y)
dist_self _ := dist_self _
dist_comm _ _ := dist_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := dist_triangle _ _ _
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_dist _ _ := edist_dist _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := (uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).eq_biInf
toBornology := Bornology.induced f
cobounded_sets := Set.ext fun s => mem_comap_iff_compl.trans <| by
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff, forall_mem_image, mem_setOf]
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by an inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `TopologicalSpace`
structure. -/
def Topology.IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
[m : PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceTopology (.induced f m) hf.eq_induced
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace := IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by a uniform inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `UniformSpace`
structure. -/
def IsUniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [UniformSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f : α → β) (h : IsUniformInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceUniformity (.induced f m) h.comap_uniformity.symm
instance Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace {p : α → Prop} : PseudoMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
lemma Subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : dist x y = dist (x : α) y := rfl
lemma Subtype.nndist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : nndist x y = nndist (x : α) y := rfl
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : dist (unop x) (unop y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_op (x y : α) : dist (op x) (op y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : nndist (unop x) (unop y) = nndist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_op (x y : α) : nndist (op x) (op y) = nndist x y := rfl
end MulOpposite
section NNReal
instance : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ≥0 := Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
lemma NNReal.dist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : dist a b = |(a : ℝ) - b| := rfl
lemma NNReal.nndist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ => by
simp only [max_le_iff, tsub_le_iff_right (α := ℝ≥0)]
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nndist, dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff,
tsub_le_iff_right, NNReal.coe_add]
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist 0 z = z := by
simp only [NNReal.nndist_eq, max_eq_right, tsub_zero, zero_tsub, zero_le']
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val' (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist z 0 = z := by
rw [nndist_comm]
exact NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val z
lemma NNReal.le_add_nndist (a b : ℝ≥0) : a ≤ b + nndist a b := by
suffices (a : ℝ) ≤ (b : ℝ) + dist a b by
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_nndist]
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact le_of_abs_le (dist_eq a b).ge
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Ico 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico (c : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Ico 0 c.toNNReal := by
by_cases c_pos : 0 < c
· convert NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' ⟨c, c_pos.le⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_pos.le]
simp [not_lt.mp c_pos]
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Icc 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc {c : ℝ} (c_nn : 0 ≤ c) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Icc 0 c.toNNReal := by
convert NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' ⟨c, c_nn⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_nn]
end NNReal
namespace ULift
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ULift β) := PseudoMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
lemma dist_eq (x y : ULift β) : dist x y = dist x.down y.down := rfl
lemma nndist_eq (x y : ULift β) : nndist x y = nndist x.down y.down := rfl
@[simp] lemma dist_up_up (x y : β) : dist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = dist x y := rfl
@[simp] lemma nndist_up_up (x y : β) : nndist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = nndist x y := rfl
end ULift
section Prod
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax : PseudoMetricSpace (α × β) :=
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun x y : α × β => dist x.1 y.1 ⊔ dist x.2 y.2)
(fun _ _ => (max_lt (edist_lt_top _ _) (edist_lt_top _ _)).ne) fun x y => by
simp only [dist_edist, ← ENNReal.toReal_max (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
Prod.edist_eq]
i.replaceBornology fun s => by
simp only [← isBounded_image_fst_and_snd, isBounded_iff_eventually, forall_mem_image, ←
eventually_and, ← forall_and, ← max_le_iff]
rfl
lemma Prod.dist_eq {x y : α × β} : dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_left {x : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} : dist (x, y₁) (x, y₂) = dist y₁ y₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_right {x₁ x₂ : α} {y : β} : dist (x₁, y) (x₂, y) = dist x₁ x₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
lemma ball_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) : ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma closedBall_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r := ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma sphere_prod (x : α × β) (r : ℝ) :
sphere x r = sphere x.1 r ×ˢ closedBall x.2 r ∪ closedBall x.1 r ×ˢ sphere x.2 r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· cases x
simp_rw [← closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, union_self, closedBall_prod_same]
· ext ⟨x', y'⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_prod, Metric.mem_closedBall, Metric.mem_sphere, Prod.dist_eq,
max_eq_iff]
refine or_congr (and_congr_right ?_) (and_comm.trans (and_congr_left ?_))
all_goals rintro rfl; rfl
end Prod
lemma uniformContinuous_dist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a b} h =>
calc dist (dist a.1 a.2) (dist b.1 b.2) ≤ dist a.1 b.1 + dist a.2 b.2 :=
dist_dist_dist_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ dist a b + dist a b := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
_ < ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_lt_add h h
_ = ε := add_halves ε⟩
protected lemma UniformContinuous.dist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_dist.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_dist : Continuous fun p : α × α ↦ dist p.1 p.2 := uniformContinuous_dist.continuous
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected lemma Continuous.dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_dist.comp₂ hf hg
protected lemma Filter.Tendsto.dist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (dist a b)) :=
(continuous_dist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous fun x : β × β => dist (f x.1) (f x.2) :=
⟨fun h => h.fst'.dist h.snd', fun h =>
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
(h.comp (.prodMk_left _)).tendsto' _ _ <| dist_self _⟩
lemma uniformContinuous_nndist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.subtype_mk _
protected lemma UniformContinuous.nndist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
lemma continuous_nndist : Continuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.continuous
@[fun_prop]
protected lemma Continuous.nndist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_nndist.comp₂ hf hg
protected lemma Filter.Tendsto.nndist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => nndist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (nndist a b)) :=
(continuous_nndist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Constructions.lean | 362 | 364 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DeleteEdges
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
/-!
# Subgraphs of a simple graph
A subgraph of a simple graph consists of subsets of the graph's vertices and edges such that the
endpoints of each edge are present in the vertex subset. The edge subset is formalized as a
sub-relation of the adjacency relation of the simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `Subgraph G` is the type of subgraphs of a `G : SimpleGraph V`.
* `Subgraph.neighborSet`, `Subgraph.incidenceSet`, and `Subgraph.degree` are like their
`SimpleGraph` counterparts, but they refer to vertices from `G` to avoid subtype coercions.
* `Subgraph.coe` is the coercion from a `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`.
(In Lean 3 this could not be a `Coe` instance since the destination type depends on `G'`.)
* `Subgraph.IsSpanning` for whether a subgraph is a spanning subgraph and
`Subgraph.IsInduced` for whether a subgraph is an induced subgraph.
* Instances for `Lattice (Subgraph G)` and `BoundedOrder (Subgraph G)`.
* `SimpleGraph.toSubgraph`: If a `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another, then you can turn it
into a member of the larger graph's `SimpleGraph.Subgraph` type.
* Graph homomorphisms from a subgraph to a graph (`Subgraph.map_top`) and between subgraphs
(`Subgraph.map`).
## Implementation notes
* Recall that subgraphs are not determined by their vertex sets, so `SetLike` does not apply to
this kind of subobject.
## TODO
* Images of graph homomorphisms as subgraphs.
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- A subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` is a subset of vertices along with a restriction of the adjacency
relation that is symmetric and is supported by the vertex subset. They also form a bounded lattice.
Thinking of `V → V → Prop` as `Set (V × V)`, a set of darts (i.e., half-edges), then
`Subgraph.adj_sub` is that the darts of a subgraph are a subset of the darts of `G`. -/
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
/-- Vertices of the subgraph -/
verts : Set V
/-- Edges of the subgraph -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
/-- The one-vertex subgraph. -/
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
/-- The one-edge subgraph. -/
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {H : G.Subgraph} {u v w x : V} (h2 : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) :
H.Adj u v ↔ H.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h2
rcases h2 with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, Subgraph.adj_comm]
/-- Coercion from `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`. -/
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
instance (G : SimpleGraph V) (H : Subgraph G) [DecidableRel H.Adj] : DecidableRel H.coe.Adj :=
fun a b ↦ ‹DecidableRel H.Adj› _ _
/-- A subgraph is called a *spanning subgraph* if it contains all the vertices of `G`. -/
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
protected alias ⟨IsSpanning.verts_eq_univ, _⟩ := isSpanning_iff
/-- Coercion from `Subgraph G` to `SimpleGraph V`. If `G'` is a spanning
subgraph, then `G'.spanningCoe` yields an isomorphic graph.
In general, this adds in all vertices from `V` as isolated vertices. -/
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
lemma spanningCoe_le (G' : G.Subgraph) : G'.spanningCoe ≤ G := fun _ _ ↦ G'.3
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
lemma mem_of_adj_spanningCoe {v w : V} {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s)
(hadj : G.spanningCoe.Adj v w) : v ∈ s := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma spanningCoe_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hadj : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hadj).spanningCoe = fromEdgeSet {s(v, w)} := by
ext v w
aesop
/-- `spanningCoe` is equivalent to `coe` for a subgraph that `IsSpanning`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph is called an *induced subgraph* if vertices of `G'` are adjacent if
they are adjacent in `G`. -/
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ G'.verts → ∀ ⦃w⦄, w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
@[simp] protected lemma IsInduced.adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (hG' : G'.IsInduced) {a b : G'.verts} :
G'.Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
⟨coe_adj_sub _ _ _, hG' a.2 b.2⟩
/-- `H.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in the subgraph `H`. -/
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
/-- `G'.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G'`. -/
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph as a graph has equivalent neighbor sets. -/
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The edge set of `G'` consists of a subset of edges of `G`. -/
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := .rfl
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_coe {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.edgeSet = Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' G'.edgeSet := by
ext e; induction e using Sym2.ind; simp
lemma image_coe_edgeSet_coe (G' : G.Subgraph) : Sym2.map (↑) '' G'.coe.edgeSet = G'.edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_coe, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
rintro e he
induction e using Sym2.ind with | h a b =>
rw [Subgraph.mem_edgeSet] at he
exact ⟨s(⟨a, edge_vert _ he⟩, ⟨b, edge_vert _ he.symm⟩), Sym2.map_pair_eq ..⟩
theorem mem_verts_of_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
induction e
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
/-- The `incidenceSet` is the set of edges incident to a given vertex. -/
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
/-- Give a vertex as an element of the subgraph's vertex type. -/
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
/--
Create an equal copy of a subgraph (see `copy_eq`) with possibly different definitional equalities.
See Note [range copy pattern].
-/
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext hV hadj
/-- The union of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Max G.Subgraph where
max G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The intersection of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Min G.Subgraph where
min G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The `top` subgraph is `G` as a subgraph of itself. -/
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
/-- The `bot` subgraph is the subgraph with no vertices or edges. -/
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem verts_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).verts = ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sInf s).verts = ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_iSup {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).verts = ⋃ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem verts_iInf {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).verts = ⋂ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iInf]
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).coe = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma IsInduced.top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).IsInduced := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ id
/-- The graph isomorphism between the top element of `G.subgraph` and `G`. -/
def topIso : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).coe ≃g G where
toFun := (↑)
invFun a := ⟨a, Set.mem_univ _⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eta ..
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := .rfl
theorem verts_spanningCoe_injective :
(fun G' : Subgraph G => (G'.verts, G'.spanningCoe)).Injective := by
intro G₁ G₂ h
rw [Prod.ext_iff] at h
exact Subgraph.ext h.1 (spanningCoe_inj.1 h.2)
/-- For subgraphs `G₁`, `G₂`, `G₁ ≤ G₂` iff `G₁.verts ⊆ G₂.verts` and
`∀ a b, G₁.adj a b → G₂.adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ show DistribLattice G.Subgraph from
verts_spanningCoe_injective.distribLattice _
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun x y => x.verts ⊆ y.verts ∧ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w }
instance : BoundedOrder (Subgraph G) where
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top x := ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => x.adj_sub⟩
bot_le _ := ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- Note that subgraphs do not form a Boolean algebra, because of `verts`. -/
def completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms : CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms G.Subgraph :=
{ Subgraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top := fun G' => ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => G'.adj_sub⟩
bot_le := fun _ => ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
sSup := sSup
-- Porting note: needed `apply` here to modify elaboration; previously the term itself was fine.
le_sSup := fun s G' hG' => ⟨by apply Set.subset_iUnion₂ G' hG', fun _ _ hab => ⟨G', hG', hab⟩⟩
sSup_le := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, by
rintro a b ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact (hG' _ hH).2 hab⟩
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun _ G' hG' => ⟨Set.iInter₂_subset G' hG', fun _ _ hab => hab.1 hG'⟩
le_sInf := fun _ G' hG' =>
⟨Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, fun _ _ hab =>
⟨fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).2 hab, G'.adj_sub hab⟩⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => Subgraph.ext (by simpa using iInf_iSup_eq)
(by ext; simp [Classical.skolem]) }
instance : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
.ofMinimalAxioms completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms
@[gcongr] lemma verts_mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (h : H ≤ H') : H.verts ⊆ H'.verts := h.1
lemma verts_monotone : Monotone (verts : G.Subgraph → Set V) := fun _ _ h ↦ h.1
@[simps]
instance subgraphInhabited : Inhabited (Subgraph G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sup {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊔ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∪ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_inf {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊓ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∩ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_top (v : V) : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_bot (v : V) : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sSup s).neighborSet v = ⋃ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sInf s).neighborSet v = (⋂ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨆ i, f i).neighborSet v = ⋃ i, (f i).neighborSet v := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨅ i, f i).neighborSet v = (⋂ i, (f i).neighborSet v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = G.edgeSet := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊓ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∩ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∪ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).edgeSet = ⋃ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G' := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) :
(sInf s).edgeSet = (⋂ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G') ∩ G.edgeSet := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨆ i, f i).edgeSet = ⋃ i, (f i).edgeSet := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨅ i, f i).edgeSet = (⋂ i, (f i).edgeSet) ∩ G.edgeSet := by
simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = ⊥ := rfl
/-- Turn a subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` into a member of its subgraph type. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) : G.Subgraph where
verts := Set.univ
Adj := H.Adj
adj_sub e := h e
edge_vert _ := Set.mem_univ _
symm := H.symm
theorem support_mono {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.support ⊆ H'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h.2
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) :
(toSubgraph H h).IsSpanning :=
Set.mem_univ
theorem spanningCoe_le_of_le {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.spanningCoe ≤ H'.spanningCoe :=
h.2
@[simp]
lemma sup_spanningCoe (H H' : Subgraph G) :
(H ⊔ H').spanningCoe = H.spanningCoe ⊔ H'.spanningCoe := rfl
/-- The top of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the graph itself. -/
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g G where
toFun v := ↑v
invFun v := ⟨v, trivial⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- The bottom of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the empty graph on the empty
vertex type. -/
def botEquiv : (⊥ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g (⊥ : SimpleGraph Empty) where
toFun v := v.property.elim
invFun v := v.elim
left_inv := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.elim
right_inv v := v.elim
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
theorem edgeSet_mono {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.edgeSet ≤ H₂.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind h.2
theorem _root_.Disjoint.edgeSet {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Disjoint H₁.edgeSet H₂.edgeSet :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by simpa using edgeSet_mono h.le_bot
section map
variable {G' : SimpleGraph W} {f : G →g G'}
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a covariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) : G'.Subgraph where
verts := f '' H.verts
Adj := Relation.Map H.Adj f f
adj_sub := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact f.map_rel (H.adj_sub h)
edge_vert := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (H.edge_vert h)
symm := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨v, u, H.symm h, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id (H : G.Subgraph) : H.map Hom.id = H := by ext <;> simp
lemma map_comp {U : Type*} {G'' : SimpleGraph U} (H : G.Subgraph) (f : G →g G') (g : G' →g G'') :
H.map (g.comp f) = (H.map f).map g := by ext <;> simp [Subgraph.map]
@[gcongr] lemma map_mono {H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph} (hH : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.map f ≤ H₂.map f := by
constructor
· intro
simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro v hv rfl
exact ⟨_, hH.1 hv, rfl⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, hH.2 ha, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_monotone : Monotone (Subgraph.map f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_mono
theorem map_sup (f : G →g G') (H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph) : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).map f = H₁.map f ⊔ H₂.map f := by
ext <;> simp [Set.image_union, map_adj, sup_adj, Relation.Map, or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp] lemma map_iso_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (e : G ≃g H) : Subgraph.map e.toHom ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp [Relation.Map, e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, ← e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) :
(H.map f).edgeSet = Sym2.map f '' H.edgeSet := Sym2.fromRel_relationMap ..
end map
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a contravariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G'.Subgraph) : G.Subgraph where
verts := f ⁻¹' H.verts
Adj u v := G.Adj u v ∧ H.Adj (f u) (f v)
adj_sub h := h.1
edge_vert h := Set.mem_preimage.1 (H.edge_vert h.2)
symm _ _ h := ⟨G.symm h.1, H.symm h.2⟩
theorem comap_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.comap f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
apply h.1
· intro v w
simp +contextual only [comap_adj, and_imp, true_and]
intro
apply h.2
@[simp] lemma comap_equiv_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g H) : Subgraph.comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [f.map_adj]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) (H' : G'.Subgraph) :
H.map f ≤ H' ↔ H ≤ H'.comap f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun v hv ↦ ?_, fun v w hvw ↦ ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨fun v ↦ ?_, fun v w ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
exact h.1 ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
· simp only [H.adj_sub hvw, comap_adj, true_and]
exact h.2 ⟨v, w, hvw, rfl, rfl⟩
· simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro w hw rfl
exact h.1 hw
· simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro u u' hu rfl rfl
exact (h.2 hu).2
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.Subgraph := by
refine .ofBijective
(α := {H : Finset V × (V → V → Bool) //
(∀ a b, H.2 a b → G.Adj a b) ∧ (∀ a b, H.2 a b → a ∈ H.1) ∧ ∀ a b, H.2 a b = H.2 b a})
(fun H ↦ ⟨H.1.1, fun a b ↦ H.1.2 a b, @H.2.1, @H.2.2.1, by simp [Symmetric, H.2.2.2]⟩)
⟨?_, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩
simp [funext_iff]
· classical
exact ⟨⟨(H.verts.toFinset, fun a b ↦ H.Adj a b), fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.adj_sub,
fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.edge_vert, by simp [H.adj_comm]⟩, by simp⟩
instance [Finite V] : Finite G.Subgraph := by classical cases nonempty_fintype V; infer_instance
/-- Given two subgraphs, one a subgraph of the other, there is an induced injective homomorphism of
the subgraphs as graphs. -/
@[simps]
def inclusion {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : x.coe →g y.coe where
toFun v := ⟨↑v, And.left h v.property⟩
map_rel' hvw := h.2 hvw
theorem inclusion.injective {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := by
intro v w h
rw [inclusion, DFunLike.coe, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at h
exact Subtype.ext h
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` into `G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def hom (x : Subgraph G) : x.coe →g G where
toFun v := v
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
@[simp] lemma coe_hom (x : Subgraph G) :
(x.hom : x.verts → V) = (fun (v : x.verts) => (v : V)) := rfl
theorem hom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.hom :=
fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.ext
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias hom.injective := hom_injective
@[simp] lemma map_hom_top (G' : G.Subgraph) : Subgraph.map G'.hom ⊤ = G' := by
aesop (add unfold safe Relation.Map, unsafe G'.edge_vert, unsafe Adj.symm)
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` as
a spanning subgraph into `G`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningHom (x : Subgraph G) : x.spanningCoe →g G where
toFun := id
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
theorem spanningHom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.spanningHom :=
fun _ _ ↦ id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias spanningHom.injective := spanningHom_injective
theorem neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) (v : V) :
x.neighborSet v ⊆ y.neighborSet v :=
fun _ h' ↦ h.2 h'
instance neighborSet.decidablePred (G' : Subgraph G) [h : DecidableRel G'.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v) :=
h v
/-- If a graph is locally finite at a vertex, then so is a subgraph of that graph. -/
instance finiteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [DecidableRel G'.Adj]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G.neighborSet v) (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
/-- If a subgraph is locally finite at a vertex, then so are subgraphs of that subgraph.
This is not an instance because `G''` cannot be inferred. -/
def finiteAtOfSubgraph {G' G'' : Subgraph G} [DecidableRel G'.Adj] (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : G'.verts)
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G''.neighborSet v) (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
instance (G' : Subgraph G) [Fintype G'.verts] (v : V) [DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset G'.verts (neighborSet_subset_verts G' v)
instance coeFiniteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (coeNeighborSetEquiv v).symm
theorem IsSpanning.card_verts [Fintype V] {G' : Subgraph G} [Fintype G'.verts] (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.verts.toFinset.card = Fintype.card V := by
simp only [isSpanning_iff.1 h, Set.toFinset_univ]
congr
/-- The degree of a vertex in a subgraph. It's zero for vertices outside the subgraph. -/
def degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : ℕ :=
Fintype.card (G'.neighborSet v)
theorem finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
(G'.neighborSet v).toFinset.card = G'.degree v := by
rw [degree, Set.toFinset_card]
theorem degree_le (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
theorem degree_le' (G' G'' : Subgraph G) (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G''.degree v :=
Set.card_le_card (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
@[simp]
theorem coe_degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : G'.coe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Fintype.card_congr (coeNeighborSetEquiv v)
@[simp]
theorem degree_spanningCoe {G' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.spanningCoe.neighborSet v)] : G'.spanningCoe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Subgraph.degree]
congr!
theorem degree_eq_one_iff_unique_adj {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
G'.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃! w : V, G'.Adj v w := by
rw [← finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Finset.card_eq_one, Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem]
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, mem_neighborSet]
lemma neighborSet_eq_of_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
H.neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := by
lift H.neighborSet v to Finset V using h.set_finite_iff.mp hfin with s hs
lift G.neighborSet v to Finset V using hfin with t ht
refine congrArg _ <| Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le ?_ (Finset.card_eq_of_equiv h).le
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, hs, ht]
exact H.neighborSet_subset _
lemma adj_iff_of_neighborSet_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
∀ {w}, H.Adj v w ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (neighborSet_eq_of_equiv h hfin) _
end Subgraph
section MkProperties
/-! ### Properties of `singletonSubgraph` and `subgraphOfAdj` -/
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph W}
instance nonempty_singletonSubgraph_verts (v : V) : Nonempty (G.singletonSubgraph v).verts :=
⟨⟨v, Set.mem_singleton v⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singletonSubgraph_le_iff (v : V) (H : G.Subgraph) :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ H ↔ v ∈ H.verts := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.1 (Set.mem_singleton v), ?_⟩
intro h
constructor
· rwa [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
· exact fun _ _ ↦ False.elim
@[simp]
theorem map_singletonSubgraph (f : G →g G') {v : V} :
Subgraph.map f (G.singletonSubgraph v) = G'.singletonSubgraph (f v) := by
ext <;> simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply,
exists_and_left, and_iff_left_iff_imp, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Subgraph.map_verts,
singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.image_singleton]
exact False.elim
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_singletonSubgraph (v w : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).neighborSet w = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_singletonSubgraph (v : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
theorem eq_singletonSubgraph_iff_verts_eq (H : G.Subgraph) {v : V} :
H = G.singletonSubgraph v ↔ H.verts = {v} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts], fun h ↦ ?_⟩
ext
· rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts]
· simp only [Prop.bot_eq_false, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply, iff_false]
intro ha
have ha1 := ha.fst_mem
have ha2 := ha.snd_mem
rw [h, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha1 ha2
subst_vars
exact ha.ne rfl
instance nonempty_subgraphOfAdj_verts {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Nonempty (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).verts :=
⟨⟨v, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).edgeSet = {s(v, w)} := by
ext e
refine e.ind ?_
simp only [eq_comm, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subgraph.mem_edgeSet, subgraphOfAdj_adj,
forall₂_true_iff]
lemma subgraphOfAdj_le_of_adj {v w : V} (H : G.Subgraph) (h : H.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj (H.adj_sub h) ≤ H := by
constructor
· intro x
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
· simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
rintro _ _ (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩) <;> simp [h, h.symm]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_symm {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm = G.subgraphOfAdj hvw := by
ext <;> simp [or_comm, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem map_subgraphOfAdj (f : G →g G') {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Subgraph.map f (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw) = G'.subgraphOfAdj (f.map_adj hvw) := by
ext
· simp only [Subgraph.map_verts, subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_insert_iff,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl | rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· use v
simp
· use w
simp
· simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· use v, w
simp
· use w, v
simp
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_subset {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u ⊆ {v, w} :=
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet_subset_verts _
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet v = {w} := by
ext u
suffices w = u ↔ u = w by simpa [hvw.ne.symm] using this
rw [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_snd_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet w = {v} := by
rw [subgraphOfAdj_symm hvw.symm]
exact neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_of_ne_of_ne {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) (hv : u ≠ v)
(hw : u ≠ w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u = ∅ := by
ext
simp [hv.symm, hw.symm]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u =
(if u = v then {w} else ∅) ∪ if u = w then {v} else ∅ := by
split_ifs <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
theorem singletonSubgraph_fst_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph u ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
theorem singletonSubgraph_snd_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
@[simp]
lemma support_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj h).support = {u , v} := by
ext
rw [Subgraph.mem_support]
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.elim (fun hl ↦ ⟨v, .inl ⟨hl.symm, rfl⟩⟩) fun hr ↦ ⟨u, .inr ⟨rfl, hr.symm⟩⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, hw⟩
exact hw.elim (fun h1 ↦ .inl h1.1.symm) fun hr ↦ .inr hr.2.symm
end MkProperties
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V}
/-! ### Subgraphs of subgraphs -/
/-- Given a subgraph of a subgraph of `G`, construct a subgraph of `G`. -/
protected abbrev coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.map G'.hom
/-- Given a subgraph of `G`, restrict it to being a subgraph of another subgraph `G'` by
taking the portion of `G` that intersects `G'`. -/
protected abbrev restrict {G' : G.Subgraph} : G.Subgraph → G'.coe.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.comap G'.hom
@[simp]
lemma verts_coeSubgraph {G' : Subgraph G} (G'' : Subgraph G'.coe) :
(Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'').verts = (G''.verts : Set V) := rfl
lemma coeSubgraph_adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) (v w : V) :
(G'.coeSubgraph G'').Adj v w ↔
∃ (hv : v ∈ G'.verts) (hw : w ∈ G'.verts), G''.Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
simp [Relation.Map]
lemma restrict_adj {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} (v w : G'.verts) :
(G'.restrict G'').Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ G''.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem restrict_coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.restrict (Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'') = G'' := by
ext
· simp
· rw [restrict_adj, coeSubgraph_adj]
simpa using G''.adj_sub
theorem coeSubgraph_injective (G' : G.Subgraph) :
Function.Injective (Subgraph.coeSubgraph : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective restrict_coeSubgraph
lemma coeSubgraph_le {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : H.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph H' ≤ H := by
constructor
· simp
· rintro v w ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact H'.adj_sub h
lemma coeSubgraph_restrict_eq {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : G.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph (H.restrict H') = H ⊓ H' := by
ext
· simp [and_comm]
· simp_rw [coeSubgraph_adj, restrict_adj]
simp only [exists_and_left, exists_prop, inf_adj, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
/-! ### Edge deletion -/
/-- Given a subgraph `G'` and a set of vertex pairs, remove all of the corresponding edges
from its edge set, if present.
See also: `SimpleGraph.deleteEdges`. -/
def deleteEdges (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) : G.Subgraph where
verts := G'.verts
Adj := G'.Adj \ Sym2.ToRel s
adj_sub h' := G'.adj_sub h'.1
edge_vert h' := G'.edge_vert h'.1
symm a b := by simp [G'.adj_comm, Sym2.eq_swap]
section DeleteEdges
variable {G' : G.Subgraph} (s : Set (Sym2 V))
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_verts : (G'.deleteEdges s).verts = G'.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_adj (v w : V) : (G'.deleteEdges s).Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ ¬s(v, w) ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_deleteEdges (s s' : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).deleteEdges s' = G'.deleteEdges (s ∪ s') := by
ext <;> simp [and_assoc, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_empty_eq : G'.deleteEdges ∅ = G' := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_spanningCoe_eq :
G'.spanningCoe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe := by
ext
simp
theorem deleteEdges_coe_eq (s : Set (Sym2 G'.verts)) :
G'.coe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) '' s)).coe := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_adj, coe_adj, deleteEdges_adj, Set.mem_image, not_exists,
not_and, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor
· intro hs
refine Sym2.ind ?_
rintro ⟨v', hv'⟩ ⟨w', hw'⟩
simp only [Sym2.map_pair_eq, Sym2.eq]
contrapose!
rintro (_ | _) <;> simpa only [Sym2.eq_swap]
· intro h' hs
exact h' _ hs rfl
theorem coe_deleteEdges_eq (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).coe = G'.coe.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' s) := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp
theorem deleteEdges_le : G'.deleteEdges s ≤ G' := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [subset_rfl]
theorem deleteEdges_le_of_le {s s' : Set (Sym2 V)} (h : s ⊆ s') :
G'.deleteEdges s' ≤ G'.deleteEdges s := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual only [deleteEdges_verts, deleteEdges_adj,
true_and, and_imp, subset_rfl]
exact fun _ _ _ hs' hs ↦ hs' (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_left_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (G'.edgeSet ∩ s) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_right_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (s ∩ G'.edgeSet) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
theorem coe_deleteEdges_le : (G'.deleteEdges s).coe ≤ (G'.coe : SimpleGraph G'.verts) := by
intro v w
simp +contextual
theorem spanningCoe_deleteEdges_le (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe ≤ G'.spanningCoe :=
| spanningCoe_le_of_le (deleteEdges_le s)
end DeleteEdges
/-! ### Induced subgraphs -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 1,111 | 1,115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Finite
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.NoAtoms
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.SFinite
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 311 | 312 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
|
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 600 | 602 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Parity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Defs
/-!
# The upper half plane and its automorphisms
This file defines `UpperHalfPlane` to be the upper half plane in `ℂ`.
We furthermore equip it with the structure of a `GLPos 2 ℝ` action by
fractional linear transformations.
We define the notation `ℍ` for the upper half plane available in the locale
`UpperHalfPlane` so as not to conflict with the quaternions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Matrix Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
open scoped MatrixGroups
/-- The open upper half plane, denoted as `ℍ` within the `UpperHalfPlane` namespace -/
def UpperHalfPlane :=
{ point : ℂ // 0 < point.im }
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UpperHalfPlane] notation "ℍ" => UpperHalfPlane
open UpperHalfPlane
namespace UpperHalfPlane
/-- The coercion first into an element of `GL(2, ℝ)⁺`, then `GL(2, ℝ)` and finally a 2 × 2
matrix.
This notation is scoped in namespace `UpperHalfPlane`. -/
scoped notation:1024 "↑ₘ" A:1024 =>
(((A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : GL (Fin 2) ℝ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) _)
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun GL(2, ℝ)⁺ fun _ => Fin 2 → Fin 2 → ℝ where coe A := ↑ₘA
/-- The coercion into an element of `GL(2, R)` and finally a 2 × 2 matrix over `R`. This is
similar to `↑ₘ`, but without positivity requirements, and allows the user to specify the ring `R`,
which can be useful to help Lean elaborate correctly.
This notation is scoped in namespace `UpperHalfPlane`. -/
scoped notation:1024 "↑ₘ[" R "]" A:1024 =>
((A : GL (Fin 2) R) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R)
/-- Canonical embedding of the upper half-plane into `ℂ`. -/
@[coe] protected def coe (z : ℍ) : ℂ := z.1
instance : CoeOut ℍ ℂ := ⟨UpperHalfPlane.coe⟩
instance : Inhabited ℍ :=
⟨⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩⟩
@[ext] theorem ext {a b : ℍ} (h : (a : ℂ) = b) : a = b := Subtype.eq h
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ext_iff' {a b : ℍ} : (a : ℂ) = b ↔ a = b := UpperHalfPlane.ext_iff.symm
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℍ ((↑) : ℍ → ℂ) fun z => 0 < z.im :=
Subtype.canLift fun (z : ℂ) => 0 < z.im
/-- Imaginary part -/
def im (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).im
/-- Real part -/
def re (z : ℍ) :=
(z : ℂ).re
/-- Extensionality lemma in terms of `UpperHalfPlane.re` and `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
theorem ext' {a b : ℍ} (hre : a.re = b.re) (him : a.im = b.im) : a = b :=
ext <| Complex.ext hre him
/-- Constructor for `UpperHalfPlane`. It is useful if `⟨z, h⟩` makes Lean use a wrong
typeclass instance. -/
def mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : ℍ :=
⟨z, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_im (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).im = z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_re (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_re (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_im (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h).im = z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (z : ℂ) (h : 0 < z.im) : (mk z h : ℂ) = z :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_mk_subtype {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) :
UpperHalfPlane.coe ⟨z, hz⟩ = z := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (z : ℍ) (h : 0 < (z : ℂ).im := z.2) : mk z h = z :=
rfl
theorem re_add_im (z : ℍ) : (z.re + z.im * Complex.I : ℂ) = z :=
Complex.re_add_im z
theorem im_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < z.im :=
z.2
theorem im_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : z.im ≠ 0 :=
z.im_pos.ne'
theorem ne_zero (z : ℍ) : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
mt (congr_arg Complex.im) z.im_ne_zero
/-- Define I := √-1 as an element on the upper half plane. -/
def I : ℍ := ⟨Complex.I, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma I_im : I.im = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma I_re : I.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_I : I = Complex.I := rfl
end UpperHalfPlane
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.im`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.im _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneIm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.im $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(@UpperHalfPlane.im_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.im"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `UpperHalfPlane.coe`. -/
@[positivity UpperHalfPlane.coe _]
def evalUpperHalfPlaneCoe : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℂ), ~q(UpperHalfPlane.coe $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonzero q(@UpperHalfPlane.ne_zero $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not UpperHalfPlane.coe"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace UpperHalfPlane
theorem normSq_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) := by
rw [Complex.normSq_pos]; exact z.ne_zero
theorem normSq_ne_zero (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
(normSq_pos z).ne'
theorem im_inv_neg_coe_pos (z : ℍ) : 0 < (-z : ℂ)⁻¹.im := by
simpa [neg_div] using div_pos z.property (normSq_pos z)
lemma ne_nat (z : ℍ) : ∀ n : ℕ, z.1 ≠ n := by
intro n
have h1 := z.2
aesop
lemma ne_int (z : ℍ) : ∀ n : ℤ, z.1 ≠ n := by
intro n
have h1 := z.2
aesop
/-- Numerator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def num (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ := g 0 0 * z + g 0 1
/-- Denominator of the formula for a fractional linear transformation -/
def denom (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ := g 1 0 * z + g 1 1
theorem linear_ne_zero (cd : Fin 2 → ℝ) (z : ℍ) (h : cd ≠ 0) : (cd 0 : ℂ) * z + cd 1 ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
have : cd 0 = 0 := by
-- we will need this twice
apply_fun Complex.im at h
simpa only [z.im_ne_zero, Complex.add_im, add_zero, coe_im, zero_mul, or_false,
Complex.ofReal_im, Complex.zero_im, Complex.mul_im, mul_eq_zero] using h
simp only [this, zero_mul, Complex.ofReal_zero, zero_add, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
at h
ext i
fin_cases i <;> assumption
theorem denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : denom g z ≠ 0 := by
intro H
have DET := (mem_glpos _).1 g.prop
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply] at DET
obtain hg | hz : g 1 0 = 0 ∨ z.im = 0 := by simpa [num, denom] using congr_arg Complex.im H
· simp only [hg, Complex.ofReal_zero, denom, zero_mul, zero_add, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] at H
simp only [Matrix.det_fin_two g.1.1, H, hg, mul_zero, sub_zero, lt_self_iff_false] at DET
· exact z.prop.ne' hz
theorem normSq_denom_pos (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : 0 < Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z)
theorem normSq_denom_ne_zero (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : Complex.normSq (denom g z) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (normSq_denom_pos g z)
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux' (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℂ :=
num g z / denom g z
theorem smulAux'_im (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(smulAux' g z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
simp only [smulAux', num, denom, Complex.div_im, Complex.add_im, Complex.mul_im,
Complex.ofReal_re, coe_im, Complex.ofReal_im, coe_re, zero_mul, add_zero, Complex.add_re,
Complex.mul_re, sub_zero, ← sub_div, g.1.1.det_fin_two]
ring
/-- Fractional linear transformation, also known as the Moebius transformation -/
def smulAux (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : ℍ :=
mk (smulAux' g z) <| by
rw [smulAux'_im]
convert mul_pos ((mem_glpos _).1 g.prop)
(div_pos z.im_pos (Complex.normSq_pos.mpr (denom_ne_zero g z))) using 1
simp only [GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply]
ring
theorem denom_cocycle (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
denom (x * y) z = denom x (smulAux y z) * denom y z := by
change _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) * _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [denom, Subgroup.coe_mul, Fin.isValue, Units.val_mul, mul_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ,
Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Finset.sum_singleton, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one,
Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul, num]
ring
theorem mul_smul' (x y : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) : smulAux (x * y) z = smulAux x (smulAux y z) := by
ext1
change _ / _ = (_ * (_ / _) + _) / _
rw [denom_cocycle]
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [num, Subgroup.coe_mul, Fin.isValue, Units.val_mul, mul_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ,
Finset.univ_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Finset.sum_singleton, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one,
Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_mul, denom]
ring
/-- The action of `GLPos 2 ℝ` on the upper half-plane by fractional linear transformations. -/
instance : MulAction GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul := smulAux
one_smul z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _
simp [num, denom]
mul_smul := mul_smul'
instance SLAction {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] : MulAction SL(2, R) ℍ :=
MulAction.compHom ℍ <| SpecialLinearGroup.toGLPos.comp <| map (algebraMap R ℝ)
-- Porting note: in the statement, we used to have coercions `↑· : ℝ`
-- rather than `algebraMap R ℝ ·`.
theorem specialLinearGroup_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R ℝ] (g : SL(2, R)) (z : ℍ) :
g • z =
mk
(((algebraMap R ℝ (g 0 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (g 0 1) : ℂ)) /
((algebraMap R ℝ (g 1 0) : ℂ) * z + (algebraMap R ℝ (g 1 1) : ℂ)))
(g • z).property :=
rfl
variable (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul : ↑(g • z) = num g z / denom g z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem re_smul : (g • z).re = (num g z / denom g z).re :=
rfl
theorem im_smul : (g • z).im = (num g z / denom g z).im :=
rfl
theorem im_smul_eq_div_normSq : (g • z).im = det ↑ₘg * z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) :=
smulAux'_im g z
theorem c_mul_im_sq_le_normSq_denom : (g 1 0 * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
set c := g 1 0
set d := g 1 1
calc
(c * z.im) ^ 2 ≤ (c * z.im) ^ 2 + (c * z.re + d) ^ 2 := by nlinarith
_ = Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by dsimp [c, d, denom, Complex.normSq]; ring
@[simp]
theorem neg_smul : -g • z = g • z := by
ext1
change _ / _ = _ / _
field_simp [denom_ne_zero]
simp only [num, denom, Complex.ofReal_neg, neg_mul, GLPos.coe_neg_GL, Units.val_neg, neg_apply]
ring_nf
lemma denom_one : denom 1 z = 1 := by
simp [denom]
section PosRealAction
instance posRealAction : MulAction { x : ℝ // 0 < x } ℍ where
smul x z := mk ((x : ℝ) • (z : ℂ)) <| by simpa using mul_pos x.2 z.2
one_smul _ := Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ _
mul_smul x y z := Subtype.ext <| mul_smul (x : ℝ) y (z : ℂ)
variable (x : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_pos_real_smul : ↑(x • z) = (x : ℝ) • (z : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_real_im : (x • z).im = x * z.im :=
Complex.smul_im _ _
@[simp]
theorem pos_real_re : (x • z).re = x * z.re :=
Complex.smul_re _ _
end PosRealAction
section RealAddAction
instance : AddAction ℝ ℍ where
vadd x z := mk (x + z) <| by simpa using z.im_pos
zero_vadd _ := Subtype.ext <| by simp [HVAdd.hVAdd]
add_vadd x y z := Subtype.ext <| by simp [HVAdd.hVAdd, add_assoc]
variable (x : ℝ) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem coe_vadd : ↑(x +ᵥ z) = (x + z : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vadd_re : (x +ᵥ z).re = x + z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vadd_im : (x +ᵥ z).im = z.im :=
zero_add _
end RealAddAction
/- these next few lemmas are *not* flagged `@simp` because of the constructors on the RHS;
instead we use the versions with coercions to `ℂ` as simp lemmas instead. -/
theorem modular_S_smul (z : ℍ) : ModularGroup.S • z = mk (-z : ℂ)⁻¹ z.im_inv_neg_coe_pos := by
rw [specialLinearGroup_apply]; simp [ModularGroup.S, neg_div, inv_neg, toGL]
theorem modular_T_zpow_smul (z : ℍ) (n : ℤ) : ModularGroup.T ^ n • z = (n : ℝ) +ᵥ z := by
rw [UpperHalfPlane.ext_iff, coe_vadd, add_comm, specialLinearGroup_apply, coe_mk]
simp [toGL, ModularGroup.coe_T_zpow,
of_apply, cons_val_zero, algebraMap.coe_one, Complex.ofReal_one, one_mul, cons_val_one,
head_cons, algebraMap.coe_zero, zero_mul, zero_add, div_one]
theorem modular_T_smul (z : ℍ) : ModularGroup.T • z = (1 : ℝ) +ᵥ z := by
simpa only [Int.cast_one] using modular_T_zpow_smul z 1
theorem exists_SL2_smul_eq_of_apply_zero_one_eq_zero (g : SL(2, ℝ)) (hc : g 1 0 = 0) :
∃ (u : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (v : ℝ), (g • · : ℍ → ℍ) = (v +ᵥ ·) ∘ (u • ·) := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, rfl⟩ := g.fin_two_exists_eq_mk_of_apply_zero_one_eq_zero hc
refine ⟨⟨_, mul_self_pos.mpr ha⟩, b * a, ?_⟩
ext1 ⟨z, hz⟩; ext1
suffices ↑a * z * a + b * a = b * a + a * a * z by
simpa [toGL, specialLinearGroup_apply, add_mul]
ring
theorem exists_SL2_smul_eq_of_apply_zero_one_ne_zero (g : SL(2, ℝ)) (hc : g 1 0 ≠ 0) :
∃ (u : { x : ℝ // 0 < x }) (v w : ℝ),
(g • · : ℍ → ℍ) =
(w +ᵥ ·) ∘ (ModularGroup.S • · : ℍ → ℍ) ∘ (v +ᵥ · : ℍ → ℍ) ∘ (u • · : ℍ → ℍ) := by
have h_denom := denom_ne_zero g
induction g using Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.fin_two_induction with | _ a b c d h => ?_
replace hc : c ≠ 0 := by simpa using hc
refine ⟨⟨_, mul_self_pos.mpr hc⟩, c * d, a / c, ?_⟩
ext1 ⟨z, hz⟩; ext1
suffices (↑a * z + b) / (↑c * z + d) = a / c - (c * d + ↑c * ↑c * z)⁻¹ by
simpa only [modular_S_smul, inv_neg, Function.comp_apply, coe_vadd, Complex.ofReal_mul,
coe_pos_real_smul, Complex.real_smul, Complex.ofReal_div, coe_mk]
replace hc : (c : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
replace h_denom : ↑c * z + d ≠ 0 := by simpa using h_denom ⟨z, hz⟩
have h_aux : (c : ℂ) * d + ↑c * ↑c * z ≠ 0 := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_add, add_comm]
exact mul_ne_zero hc h_denom
replace h : (a * d - b * c : ℂ) = (1 : ℂ) := by norm_cast
field_simp
linear_combination (-(z * (c : ℂ) ^ 2) - c * d) * h
end UpperHalfPlane
namespace ModularGroup -- results specific to `SL(2, ℤ)`
section ModularScalarTowers
/-- Canonical embedding of `SL(2, ℤ)` into `GL(2, ℝ)⁺`. -/
@[coe]
def coe (g : SL(2, ℤ)) : GL(2, ℝ)⁺ := ((g : SL(2, ℝ)) : GL(2, ℝ)⁺)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] noncomputable alias coe' := coe
instance : Coe SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨coe⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply_complex {g : SL(2, ℤ)} {i j : Fin 2} :
(Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe g) i j = (Subtype.val g i j : ℂ) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] alias coe'_apply_complex := coe_apply_complex
@[simp]
theorem det_coe {g : SL(2, ℤ)} : det (Units.val <| Subtype.val <| coe g) = 1 := by
simp only [SpecialLinearGroup.coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, SpecialLinearGroup.det_coe, coe]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-19")] alias det_coe' := det_coe
lemma coe_one : coe 1 = 1 := by
simp only [coe, map_one]
instance SLOnGLPos : SMul SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ :=
⟨fun s g => s * g⟩
theorem SLOnGLPos_smul_apply (s : SL(2, ℤ)) (g : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (z : ℍ) :
(s • g) • z = ((s : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) * g) • z :=
rfl
instance SL_to_GL_tower : IsScalarTower SL(2, ℤ) GL(2, ℝ)⁺ ℍ where
smul_assoc s g z := by
simp only [SLOnGLPos_smul_apply]
apply mul_smul'
end ModularScalarTowers
section SLModularAction
variable (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ)
@[simp]
theorem sl_moeb (A : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) : A • z = (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) • z :=
rfl
@[simp high]
theorem SL_neg_smul (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) : -g • z = g • z := by
simp only [coe_GLPos_neg, sl_moeb, coe_int_neg, neg_smul, coe]
theorem im_smul_eq_div_normSq : (g • z).im = z.im / Complex.normSq (denom g z) := by
simpa only [coe, coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, (g : SL(2, ℝ)).prop, one_mul] using
z.im_smul_eq_div_normSq g
theorem denom_apply (g : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) :
denom g z = g 1 0 * z + g 1 1 := by
simp [denom, coe]
@[simp]
lemma denom_S (z : ℍ) : denom S z = z := by
simp only [S, denom_apply, of_apply, cons_val', cons_val_zero, empty_val', cons_val_fin_one,
cons_val_one, head_fin_const, Int.cast_one, one_mul, head_cons, Int.cast_zero, add_zero]
end SLModularAction
end ModularGroup
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Basic.lean | 515 | 516 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
/-!
# Prime factors of nonzero naturals
This file defines the factorization of a nonzero natural number `n` as a multiset of primes,
the multiplicity of `p` in this factors multiset being the p-adic valuation of `n`.
## Main declarations
* `PrimeMultiset`: Type of multisets of prime numbers.
* `FactorMultiset n`: Multiset of prime factors of `n`.
-/
/-- The type of multisets of prime numbers. Unique factorization
gives an equivalence between this set and ℕ+, as we will formalize
below. -/
def PrimeMultiset :=
Multiset Nat.Primes deriving Inhabited, AddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
SemilatticeSup, Sub
-- The `CanonicallyOrderedAdd, OrderBot, OrderedSub` instances should be constructed by a deriving
-- handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderBot PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderedSub PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (Multiset Nat.Primes))
namespace PrimeMultiset
-- `@[derive]` doesn't work for `meta` instances
unsafe instance : Repr PrimeMultiset := by delta PrimeMultiset; infer_instance
/-- The multiset consisting of a single prime -/
def ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : PrimeMultiset :=
({p} : Multiset Nat.Primes)
theorem card_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : Multiset.card (ofPrime p) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- We can forget the primality property and regard a multiset
of primes as just a multiset of positive integers, or a multiset
of natural numbers. In the opposite direction, if we have a
multiset of positive integers or natural numbers, together with
a proof that all the elements are prime, then we can regard it
as a multiset of primes. The next block of results records
obvious properties of these coercions.
-/
def toNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coeNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨toNatMultiset⟩
/-- `PrimeMultiset.coe`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of
naturals, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeNatMonoidHom : (coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_nat_injective
theorem coeNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ) = {(p : ℕ)} :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
/-- Converts a `PrimeMultiset` to a `Multiset ℕ+`. -/
def toPNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coePNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ+) :=
⟨toPNatMultiset⟩
/-- `coePNat`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of positive
naturals, regarded as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ+ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coePNatMonoidHom : (coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
theorem coePNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ+) = {(p : ℕ+)} :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ+) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ+)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
instance coeMultisetPNatNat : Coe (Multiset ℕ+) (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨fun v => v.map (↑)⟩
theorem coePNat_nat (v : PrimeMultiset) : ((v : Multiset ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ) := by
change (v.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+)).map Subtype.val = v.map Subtype.val
rw [Multiset.map_map]
congr
/-- The product of a `PrimeMultiset`, as a `ℕ+`. -/
def prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : ℕ+ :=
(v : Multiset PNat).prod
theorem coe_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : (v.prod : ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ).prod := by
have h : (v.prod : ℕ) = ((v.map (↑) : Multiset ℕ+).map (↑)).prod :=
PNat.coeMonoidHom.map_multiset_prod v.toPNatMultiset
simpa [Multiset.map_map] using h
theorem prod_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p).prod = (p : ℕ+) :=
Multiset.prod_singleton _
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ Nat.Primes Nat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨p, hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) : (ofNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ) = v := by
dsimp [ofNatMultiset, toNatMultiset]
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id']
theorem prod_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) :
((ofNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ) = (v.prod : ℕ) := by rw [coe_prod, to_ofNatMultiset]
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ+ Nat.Primes PNat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨(p : ℕ), hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ+) = v := by
dsimp [ofPNatMultiset, toPNatMultiset]
have : (fun (p : ℕ+) (h : p.Prime) => ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
apply Subtype.eq
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
theorem prod_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : ((ofPNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ+) = v.prod := by
dsimp [prod]
rw [to_ofPNatMultiset]
/-- Lists can be coerced to multisets; here we have some results
about how this interacts with our constructions on multisets. -/
def ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
theorem prod_ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h) : ((ofNatList l h).prod : ℕ) = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- If a `List ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset` with
the coercion from lists to multisets. -/
def ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
theorem prod_ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatList l h).prod = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- The product map gives a homomorphism from the additive monoid
of multisets to the multiplicative monoid ℕ+. -/
theorem prod_zero : (0 : PrimeMultiset).prod = 1 := by
exact Multiset.prod_zero
theorem prod_add (u v : PrimeMultiset) : (u + v).prod = u.prod * v.prod := by
change (coePNatMonoidHom (u + v)).prod = _
rw [coePNatMonoidHom.map_add]
exact Multiset.prod_add _ _
theorem prod_smul (d : ℕ) (u : PrimeMultiset) : (d • u).prod = u.prod ^ d := by
induction d with
| zero => simp only [zero_nsmul, pow_zero, prod_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [succ_nsmul, prod_add, ih, pow_succ]
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- The prime factors of n, regarded as a multiset -/
def factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : PrimeMultiset :=
PrimeMultiset.ofNatList (Nat.primeFactorsList n) (@Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList n)
/-- The product of the factors is the original number -/
theorem prod_factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : (factorMultiset n).prod = n :=
eq <| by
dsimp [factorMultiset]
rw [PrimeMultiset.prod_ofNatList]
exact Nat.prod_primeFactorsList n.ne_zero
theorem coeNat_factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) :
(factorMultiset n : Multiset ℕ) = (Nat.primeFactorsList n : Multiset ℕ) :=
PrimeMultiset.to_ofNatMultiset (Nat.primeFactorsList n) (@Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList n)
end PNat
namespace PrimeMultiset
/-- If we start with a multiset of primes, take the product and
then factor it, we get back the original multiset. -/
theorem factorMultiset_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : v.prod.factorMultiset = v := by
apply PrimeMultiset.coeNat_injective
rw [v.prod.coeNat_factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.coe_prod]
rcases v with ⟨l⟩
dsimp [PrimeMultiset.toNatMultiset]
let l' := l.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ)
have (p : ℕ) (hp : p ∈ l') : p.Prime := by
simp only [List.map_subtype, List.map_id_fun', id_eq, List.mem_unattach, l'] at hp
obtain ⟨hp', -⟩ := hp
exact hp'
exact Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr (@Nat.primeFactorsList_unique _ l' rfl this).symm
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- Positive integers biject with multisets of primes. -/
def factorMultisetEquiv : ℕ+ ≃ PrimeMultiset where
toFun := factorMultiset
invFun := PrimeMultiset.prod
left_inv := prod_factorMultiset
right_inv := PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod
/-- Factoring gives a homomorphism from the multiplicative
monoid ℕ+ to the additive monoid of multisets. -/
theorem factorMultiset_one : factorMultiset 1 = 0 := by
simp [factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.ofNatList, PrimeMultiset.ofNatMultiset]
theorem factorMultiset_mul (n m : ℕ+) :
factorMultiset (n * m) = factorMultiset n + factorMultiset m := by
let u := factorMultiset n
let v := factorMultiset m
have : n = u.prod := (prod_factorMultiset n).symm; rw [this]
have : m = v.prod := (prod_factorMultiset m).symm; rw [this]
rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_add]
repeat' rw [PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod]
theorem factorMultiset_pow (n : ℕ+) (m : ℕ) :
factorMultiset (n ^ m) = m • factorMultiset n := by
let u := factorMultiset n
have : n = u.prod := (prod_factorMultiset n).symm
rw [this, ← PrimeMultiset.prod_smul]
repeat' rw [PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod]
/-- Factoring a prime gives the corresponding one-element multiset. -/
theorem factorMultiset_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) :
(p : ℕ+).factorMultiset = PrimeMultiset.ofPrime p := by
apply factorMultisetEquiv.symm.injective
change (p : ℕ+).factorMultiset.prod = (PrimeMultiset.ofPrime p).prod
rw [(p : ℕ+).prod_factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.prod_ofPrime]
/-- We now have four different results that all encode the
idea that inequality of multisets corresponds to divisibility
of positive integers. -/
theorem factorMultiset_le_iff {m n : ℕ+} : factorMultiset m ≤ factorMultiset n ↔ m ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← prod_factorMultiset m, ← prod_factorMultiset m]
apply Dvd.intro (n.factorMultiset - m.factorMultiset).prod
rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_add, PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
prod_factorMultiset]
· intro h
rw [← mul_div_exact h, factorMultiset_mul]
exact le_self_add
theorem factorMultiset_le_iff' {m : ℕ+} {v : PrimeMultiset} :
factorMultiset m ≤ v ↔ m ∣ v.prod := by
let h := @factorMultiset_le_iff m v.prod
rw [v.factorMultiset_prod] at h
exact h
end PNat
namespace PrimeMultiset
theorem prod_dvd_iff {u v : PrimeMultiset} : u.prod ∣ v.prod ↔ u ≤ v := by
let h := @PNat.factorMultiset_le_iff' u.prod v
rw [u.factorMultiset_prod] at h
exact h.symm
theorem prod_dvd_iff' {u : PrimeMultiset} {n : ℕ+} : u.prod ∣ n ↔ u ≤ n.factorMultiset := by
let h := @prod_dvd_iff u n.factorMultiset
rw [n.prod_factorMultiset] at h
exact h
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- The gcd and lcm operations on positive integers correspond
to the inf and sup operations on multisets. -/
theorem factorMultiset_gcd (m n : ℕ+) :
factorMultiset (gcd m n) = factorMultiset m ⊓ factorMultiset n := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_inf_iff.mpr; constructor <;> apply factorMultiset_le_iff.mpr
· exact gcd_dvd_left m n
· exact gcd_dvd_right m n
· rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_dvd_iff, prod_factorMultiset]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rw [PrimeMultiset.prod_dvd_iff']
· exact inf_le_left
· exact inf_le_right
theorem factorMultiset_lcm (m n : ℕ+) :
factorMultiset (lcm m n) = factorMultiset m ⊔ factorMultiset n := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_dvd_iff, prod_factorMultiset]
apply lcm_dvd <;> rw [← factorMultiset_le_iff']
· exact le_sup_left
· exact le_sup_right
· apply sup_le_iff.mpr; constructor <;> apply factorMultiset_le_iff.mpr
· exact dvd_lcm_left m n
· exact dvd_lcm_right m n
/-- The number of occurrences of p in the factor multiset of m
is the same as the p-adic valuation of m. -/
theorem count_factorMultiset (m : ℕ+) (p : Nat.Primes) (k : ℕ) :
(p : ℕ+) ^ k ∣ m ↔ k ≤ m.factorMultiset.count p := by
rw [Multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le, ← factorMultiset_le_iff, factorMultiset_pow,
factorMultiset_ofPrime]
congr! 2
apply Multiset.eq_replicate.mpr
constructor
· rw [Multiset.card_nsmul, PrimeMultiset.card_ofPrime, mul_one]
· intro q h
rw [PrimeMultiset.ofPrime, Multiset.nsmul_singleton _ k] at h
exact Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate h
end PNat
namespace PrimeMultiset
theorem prod_inf (u v : PrimeMultiset) : (u ⊓ v).prod = PNat.gcd u.prod v.prod := by
let n := u.prod
let m := v.prod
change (u ⊓ v).prod = PNat.gcd n m
have : u = n.factorMultiset := u.factorMultiset_prod.symm; rw [this]
have : v = m.factorMultiset := v.factorMultiset_prod.symm; rw [this]
rw [← PNat.factorMultiset_gcd n m, PNat.prod_factorMultiset]
theorem prod_sup (u v : PrimeMultiset) : (u ⊔ v).prod = PNat.lcm u.prod v.prod := by
let n := u.prod
let m := v.prod
change (u ⊔ v).prod = PNat.lcm n m
have : u = n.factorMultiset := u.factorMultiset_prod.symm; rw [this]
have : v = m.factorMultiset := v.factorMultiset_prod.symm; rw [this]
rw [← PNat.factorMultiset_lcm n m, PNat.prod_factorMultiset]
end PrimeMultiset
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Factors.lean | 388 | 398 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
variable (R S) in
@[simp]
theorem aroots_map (p : T[X]) [CommRing S] [Algebra T S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower T S R] :
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).aroots R = p.aroots R := by
rw [aroots_def, aroots_def, map_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq T S R]
/-- The set of distinct roots of `p` in `S`.
If you have a non-separable polynomial, use `Polynomial.aroots` for the multiset
where multiple roots have the appropriate multiplicity. -/
def rootSet (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Set S :=
haveI := Classical.decEq S
(p.aroots S).toFinset
theorem rootSet_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [DecidableEq S] :
p.rootSet S = (p.aroots S).toFinset := by
rw [rootSet]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).rootSet S = ∅ := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, aroots_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.coe_empty]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_0, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_one (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (1 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_1, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_neg (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(-p).rootSet S = p.rootSet S := by
rw [rootSet, aroots_neg, rootSet]
instance rootSetFintype (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
Fintype (p.rootSet S) :=
FinsetCoe.fintype _
theorem rootSet_finite (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(p.rootSet S).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
/-- The set of roots of all polynomials of bounded degree and having coefficients in a finite set
is finite. -/
theorem bUnion_roots_finite {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [DecidableEq S]
(m : R →+* S) (d : ℕ) {U : Set R} (h : U.Finite) :
(⋃ (f : R[X]) (_ : f.natDegree ≤ d ∧ ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ U),
((f.map m).roots.toFinset.toSet : Set S)).Finite :=
Set.Finite.biUnion
(by
-- We prove that the set of polynomials under consideration is finite because its
-- image by the injective map `π` is finite
let π : R[X] → Fin (d + 1) → R := fun f i => f.coeff i
refine ((Set.Finite.pi fun _ => h).subset <| ?_).of_finite_image (?_ : Set.InjOn π _)
· exact Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun f hf i _ => hf.2 i
· refine fun x hx y hy hxy => (ext_iff_natDegree_le hx.1 hy.1).2 fun i hi => ?_
exact id congr_fun hxy ⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi⟩)
fun _ _ => Finset.finite_toSet _
theorem mem_rootSet' {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S} :
a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset, mem_aroots']
theorem mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_rootSet', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
theorem mem_rootSet_of_ne {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] (hp : p ≠ 0) {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ aeval a p = 0 :=
mem_rootSet.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem rootSet_maps_to' {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
[IsDomain S'] [Algebra T S'] (hp : p.map (algebraMap T S') = 0 → p.map (algebraMap T S) = 0)
(f : S →ₐ[T] S') : (p.rootSet S).MapsTo f (p.rootSet S') := fun x hx => by
rw [mem_rootSet'] at hx ⊢
rw [aeval_algHom, AlgHom.comp_apply, hx.2, _root_.map_zero]
exact ⟨mt hp hx.1, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
(h : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : p ≠ 0 := fun hf => by rwa [hf, rootSet_zero] at h
theorem aeval_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
(hx : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : aeval a p = 0 :=
(mem_rootSet'.1 hx).2
theorem rootSet_mapsTo {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
[IsDomain S'] [Algebra T S'] [NoZeroSMulDivisors T S'] (f : S →ₐ[T] S') :
(p.rootSet S).MapsTo f (p.rootSet S') := by
refine rootSet_maps_to' (fun h₀ => ?_) f
obtain rfl : p = 0 :=
map_injective _ (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S') (by rwa [Polynomial.map_zero])
exact Polynomial.map_zero _
theorem mem_rootSet_of_injective [CommRing S] {p : S[X]} [Algebra S R]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap S R)) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ p.rootSet R ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
classical
exact Multiset.mem_toFinset.trans (mem_roots_map_of_injective h hp)
end Roots
lemma eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
(p : R[X]) {ι} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(heval : ∀ i, p.eval (f i) = 0) (hcard : natDegree p < Fintype.card ι) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine lt_irrefl #p.roots.toFinset ?_
calc
#p.roots.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card p.roots := Multiset.toFinset_card_le _
_ ≤ natDegree p := Polynomial.card_roots' p
_ < Fintype.card ι := hcard
_ = Fintype.card (Set.range f) := (Set.card_range_of_injective hf).symm
_ = #(Finset.univ.image f) := by rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Set.toFinset_range]
_ ≤ #p.roots.toFinset := Finset.card_mono ?_
intro _
simp only [Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots', ne_eq,
IsRoot.def, forall_exists_index, hp, not_false_eq_true]
rintro x rfl
exact heval _
lemma eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero' {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
(p : R[X]) (s : Finset R) (heval : ∀ i ∈ s, p.eval i = 0) (hcard : natDegree p < #s) :
p = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero p Subtype.val_injective
(fun i : s ↦ heval i i.prop) (hcard.trans_eq (Fintype.card_coe s).symm)
open Cardinal in
lemma eq_zero_of_forall_eval_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card
(f : R[X]) (hf : ∀ r, f.eval r = 0) (hfR : f.natDegree < #R) : f = 0 := by
obtain hR|hR := finite_or_infinite R
· have := Fintype.ofFinite R
apply eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero f Function.injective_id hf
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_lt] using hfR
· exact zero_of_eval_zero _ hf
open Cardinal in
lemma exists_eval_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card (f : R[X]) (hf : f ≠ 0) (hfR : f.natDegree < #R) :
∃ r, f.eval r ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hf
exact eq_zero_of_forall_eval_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card f hf hfR
section
omit [IsDomain R]
theorem monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : Monic (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C a
theorem monic_prod_X_sub_C {α : Type*} (b : α → R) (s : Finset α) :
Monic (∏ a ∈ s, (X - C (b a))) :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C (b a)
theorem monic_finprod_X_sub_C {α : Type*} (b : α → R) : Monic (∏ᶠ k, (X - C (b k))) :=
monic_finprod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C (b a)
end
theorem prod_multiset_root_eq_finset_root [DecidableEq R] :
(p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod =
p.roots.toFinset.prod fun a => (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p := by
simp only [count_roots, Finset.prod_multiset_map_count]
/-- The product `∏ (X - a)` for `a` inside the multiset `p.roots` divides `p`. -/
theorem prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd (p : R[X]) : (p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod ∣ p := by
classical
rw [← map_dvd_map _ (IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R)
(monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C p.roots)]
rw [prod_multiset_root_eq_finset_root, Polynomial.map_prod]
refine Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime (fun a _ b _ h => ?_) fun a _ => ?_
· simp_rw [Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_sub, map_C, map_X]
exact (pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C (IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R) h).pow
· exact Polynomial.map_dvd _ (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a)
/-- A Galois connection. -/
theorem _root_.Multiset.prod_X_sub_C_dvd_iff_le_roots {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun a => X - C a).prod ∣ p ↔ s ≤ p.roots := by
classical exact
⟨fun h =>
Multiset.le_iff_count.2 fun r => by
rw [count_roots, le_rootMultiplicity_iff hp, ← Multiset.prod_replicate, ←
Multiset.map_replicate fun a => X - C a, ← Multiset.filter_eq]
exact (Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le <| Multiset.map_le_map <| s.filter_le _).trans h,
fun h =>
(Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le <| Multiset.map_le_map h).trans p.prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd⟩
theorem exists_prod_multiset_X_sub_C_mul (p : R[X]) :
∃ q,
(p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod * q = p ∧
Multiset.card p.roots + q.natDegree = p.natDegree ∧ q.roots = 0 := by
obtain ⟨q, he⟩ := p.prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd
use q, he.symm
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· rw [mul_zero] at he
subst he
simp
constructor
· conv_rhs => rw [he]
rw [(monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C p.roots).natDegree_mul' hq,
natDegree_multiset_prod_X_sub_C_eq_card]
· replace he := congr_arg roots he.symm
rw [roots_mul, roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C] at he
exacts [add_eq_left.1 he, mul_ne_zero (monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C p.roots).ne_zero hq]
/-- A polynomial `p` that has as many roots as its degree
can be written `p = p.leadingCoeff * ∏(X - a)`, for `a` in `p.roots`. -/
theorem C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C (hroots : Multiset.card p.roots = p.natDegree) :
C p.leadingCoeff * (p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod = p :=
(eq_leadingCoeff_mul_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le (monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C p.roots)
p.prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd
((natDegree_multiset_prod_X_sub_C_eq_card _).trans hroots).ge).symm
/-- A monic polynomial `p` that has as many roots as its degree
can be written `p = ∏(X - a)`, for `a` in `p.roots`. -/
theorem prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq (hp : p.Monic)
(hroots : Multiset.card p.roots = p.natDegree) : (p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod = p := by
convert C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C hroots
rw [hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, one_mul]
theorem Monic.isUnit_leadingCoeff_of_dvd {a p : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) (hap : a ∣ p) :
IsUnit a.leadingCoeff :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (by simpa only [hp.leadingCoeff] using leadingCoeff_dvd_leadingCoeff hap)
/-- To check a monic polynomial is irreducible, it suffices to check only for
divisors that have smaller degree.
See also: `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree`.
-/
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_degree_lt {p : R[X]} (p_monic : Monic p) (p_1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, degree q ≤ ↑(p.natDegree / 2) → q ∣ p → IsUnit q := by
simp only [p_monic.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt p_1, Finset.mem_Ioc, and_imp,
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le]
constructor
· rintro h q deg_le dvd
by_contra q_unit
have := degree_pos_of_not_isUnit_of_dvd_monic p_monic q_unit dvd
have hu := p_monic.isUnit_leadingCoeff_of_dvd dvd
refine (h _ (monic_of_isUnit_leadingCoeff_inv_smul hu) ?_ ?_ (dvd_trans ?_ dvd)).elim
· rwa [degree_smul_of_smul_regular _ (isSMulRegular_of_group _)]
· rwa [degree_smul_of_smul_regular _ (isSMulRegular_of_group _)]
· rw [Units.smul_def, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul, (isUnit_C.mpr (Units.isUnit _)).mul_left_dvd]
· rintro h q _ deg_pos deg_le dvd
exact deg_pos.ne' <| degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit (h q deg_le dvd)
end CommRing
section
variable {A B : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
theorem le_rootMultiplicity_map {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B} (hmap : map f p ≠ 0) (a : A) :
rootMultiplicity a p ≤ rootMultiplicity (f a) (p.map f) := by
rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff hmap]
refine _root_.trans ?_ ((mapRingHom f).map_dvd (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a))
rw [map_pow, map_sub, coe_mapRingHom, map_X, map_C]
theorem eq_rootMultiplicity_map {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : A) :
rootMultiplicity a p = rootMultiplicity (f a) (p.map f) := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0; · simp only [hp0, rootMultiplicity_zero, Polynomial.map_zero]
apply le_antisymm (le_rootMultiplicity_map ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp0) a)
rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff hp0, ← map_dvd_map f hf ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow _),
Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C]
apply pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd
theorem count_map_roots [IsDomain A] [DecidableEq B] {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B} (hmap : map f p ≠ 0)
(b : B) :
(p.roots.map f).count b ≤ rootMultiplicity b (p.map f) := by
rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff hmap, ← Multiset.prod_replicate, ←
Multiset.map_replicate fun a => X - C a]
rw [← Multiset.filter_eq]
refine
(Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le <| Multiset.map_le_map <| Multiset.filter_le (Eq b) _).trans ?_
convert Polynomial.map_dvd f p.prod_multiset_X_sub_C_dvd
simp only [Polynomial.map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]
congr; ext1
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C]
theorem count_map_roots_of_injective [IsDomain A] [DecidableEq B] (p : A[X]) {f : A →+* B}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (b : B) :
(p.roots.map f).count b ≤ rootMultiplicity b (p.map f) := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, roots_zero, Multiset.map_zero, Multiset.count_zero, Polynomial.map_zero,
rootMultiplicity_zero, le_refl]
· exact count_map_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp0) b
theorem map_roots_le [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B] {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B} (h : p.map f ≠ 0) :
p.roots.map f ≤ (p.map f).roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.le_iff_count.2 fun b => by
rw [count_roots]
apply count_map_roots h
theorem map_roots_le_of_injective [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B] (p : A[X]) {f : A →+* B}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : p.roots.map f ≤ (p.map f).roots := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, roots_zero, Multiset.map_zero, Polynomial.map_zero, le_rfl]
exact map_roots_le ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp0)
theorem card_roots_le_map [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B] {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B} (h : p.map f ≠ 0) :
Multiset.card p.roots ≤ Multiset.card (p.map f).roots := by
rw [← p.roots.card_map f]
exact Multiset.card_le_card (map_roots_le h)
| theorem card_roots_le_map_of_injective [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B] {p : A[X]} {f : A →+* B}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ Multiset.card (p.map f).roots := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, roots_zero, Polynomial.map_zero, Multiset.card_zero, le_rfl]
exact card_roots_le_map ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp0)
theorem roots_map_of_injective_of_card_eq_natDegree [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B] {p : A[X]}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 782 | 788 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts.
Binary biproducts are defined in `CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts`.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
open scoped Classical in
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp] theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
@[simp] theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [simp] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
noncomputable def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`. -/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`. -/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasProductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasProductsOfShape J C where
has_limit _ := hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasCoproductsOfShape J C where
has_colimit _ := hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit. -/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
colimit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoCoproduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).hom = biproduct.desc (Sigma.ι f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => by simp [← Iso.eq_comp_inv]
/-- If a category has biproducts of a shape `J`, its `colim` and `lim` functor on diagrams over `J`
are isomorphic. -/
@[simps!]
def HasBiproductsOfShape.colimIsoLim [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
colim (J := Discrete J) (C := C) ≅ lim :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun F => (Sigma.isoColimit F).symm ≪≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).symm ≪≫ biproduct.isoProduct _ ≪≫ Pi.isoLimit F)
fun η => colimit.hom_ext fun ⟨i⟩ => limit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => by
classical
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp_all [h, Sigma.isoColimit, Pi.isoLimit, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc]
theorem biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p := by
classical
ext
dsimp
simp only [Discrete.natTrans_app, Limits.IsColimit.ι_map_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.map_π,
Category.assoc, ← Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk, ← biproduct.bicone_π, ← Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk,
← biproduct.bicone_ι]
dsimp
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_π {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.π g j = biproduct.π f j ≫ p j :=
Limits.IsLimit.map_π _ _ _ (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.map p = p j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
rw [biproduct.map_eq_map']
apply
Limits.IsColimit.ι_map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as) (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_desc {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
{P : C} (k : ∀ j, g j ⟶ P) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.desc k = biproduct.desc fun j => p j ≫ k j := by
ext; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] {P : C}
(k : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j) :
biproduct.lift k ≫ biproduct.map p = biproduct.lift fun j => k j ≫ p j := by
ext; simp
/-- Given a collection of isomorphisms between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain an isomorphism between the biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.mapIso {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) :
⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).hom
inv := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).inv
instance biproduct.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (biproduct.map p) := by
classical
have : biproduct.map p =
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom ≫ Sigma.map p ≫ (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv := by
ext
simp only [map_π, isoCoproduct_hom, isoCoproduct_inv, Category.assoc, ι_desc_assoc,
ι_colimMap_assoc, Discrete.functor_obj_eq_as, Discrete.natTrans_app, colimit.ι_desc_assoc,
Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app, ι_π, ι_π_assoc]
split
all_goals simp_all
rw [this]
infer_instance
instance Pi.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (Pi.map p) := by
rw [show Pi.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
instance biproduct.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (biproduct.map p) := by
rw [show biproduct.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).hom ≫ Pi.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).inv by aesop]
infer_instance
instance Sigma.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (Sigma.map p) := by
rw [show Sigma.map p = (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
/-- Two biproducts which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
Unfortunately there are two natural ways to define each direction of this isomorphism
(because it is true for both products and coproducts separately).
We give the alternative definitions as lemmas below. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.whiskerEquiv {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] : ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.desc fun j => (w j).inv ≫ biproduct.ι g (e j)
inv := biproduct.desc fun k => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (w (e.symm k)).hom ≫ biproduct.ι f _
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_hom_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).hom =
biproduct.lift fun k => biproduct.π f (e.symm k) ≫ (w _).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_hom]
ext k j
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· rintro rfl
simp at h
· exact Ne.symm h
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_inv_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).inv =
biproduct.lift fun j => biproduct.π g (e j) ≫ (w j).hom := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_inv]
ext j k
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp only [ι_desc_assoc, ← eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality_assoc w (e.symm_apply_apply j).symm,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply, eqToHom_comp_ι, Category.assoc, bicone_ι_π_self, Category.comp_id,
lift_π, bicone_ι_π_self_assoc]
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· exact h
· rintro rfl
simp at h
attribute [local simp] Sigma.forall in
instance {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
HasBiproduct fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2 where
exists_biproduct := Nonempty.intro
{ bicone :=
{ pt := ⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i
ι := fun X => biproduct.ι (g X.1) X.2 ≫ biproduct.ι (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1
π := fun X => biproduct.π (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1 ≫ biproduct.π (g X.1) X.2
ι_π := fun ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', y⟩ => by
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h
simp
· simp only [Sigma.mk.inj_iff, not_and] at h
by_cases w : j = j'
· cases w
simp only [heq_eq_eq, forall_true_left] at h
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h]
· simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc _ w] }
isBilimit :=
{ isLimit := mkFanLimit _
(fun s => biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.lift fun c => s.proj ⟨b, c⟩)
isColimit := mkCofanColimit _
(fun s => biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.desc fun c => s.inj ⟨b, c⟩) } }
/-- An iterated biproduct is a biproduct over a sigma type. -/
@[simps]
def biproductBiproductIso {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
(⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i) ≅ (⨁ fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) where
hom := biproduct.lift fun ⟨i, x⟩ => biproduct.π _ i ≫ biproduct.π _ x
inv := biproduct.lift fun i => biproduct.lift fun x => biproduct.π _ (⟨i, x⟩ : Σ i, f i)
section πKernel
section
variable (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f]
variable (p : J → Prop) [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict p f)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the biproduct over a restricted index type to the biproduct of
the full index type. -/
def biproduct.fromSubtype : ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f ⟶ ⨁ f :=
biproduct.desc fun j => biproduct.ι _ j.val
/-- The canonical morphism from a biproduct to the biproduct over a restriction of its index
type. -/
def biproduct.toSubtype : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f :=
biproduct.lift fun _ => biproduct.π _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j =
if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
classical
ext i; dsimp
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show (i : J) ≠ j from fun h₂ => h (h₂ ▸ i.2)), comp_zero]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_eq_lift [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.lift fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ (by simp)
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both version solved using simp
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j = biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
classical
ext
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_π (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j = biproduct.π f j :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p =
if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
classical
ext i
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show j ≠ i from fun h₂ => h (h₂.symm ▸ i.2)), zero_comp]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_eq_desc [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p =
biproduct.desc fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ (by simp)
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
classical
ext
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_fromSubtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p = biproduct.ι f j :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = 𝟙 (⨁ Subtype.restrict p f) := by
refine biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => ?_
rw [Category.assoc, biproduct.toSubtype_π, biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype, Category.id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.map fun j => if p j then 𝟙 (f j) else 0 := by
ext1 i
by_cases h : p i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
end
section
variable (f : J → C) (i : J) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f)]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is the inclusion from the biproduct which omits `i`
from the index set `J` into the biproduct over `J`. -/
def biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (biproduct.fromSubtype f fun j => j ≠ i) (by simp) :
KernelFork (biproduct.π f i)) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨s.ι ≫ biproduct.toSubtype _ _, by
apply biproduct.hom_ext; intro j
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.map_π]
rcases Classical.em (i = j) with (rfl | h)
| · rw [if_neg (Classical.not_not.2 rfl), comp_zero, comp_zero, KernelFork.condition]
· rw [if_pos (Ne.symm h), Category.comp_id], by
intro m hm
rw [← hm, KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 816 | 819 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 2,309 | 2,312 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Volume forms and measures on inner product spaces
A volume form induces a Lebesgue measure on general finite-dimensional real vector spaces. In this
file, we discuss the specific situation of inner product spaces, where an orientation gives
rise to a canonical volume form. We show that the measure coming from this volume form gives
measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by any orthonormal basis, and that it coincides with
the canonical `volume` from the `MeasureSpace` instance.
-/
open Module MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set
variable {ι E F : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F]
namespace LinearIsometryEquiv
variable (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F)
/-- Every linear isometry equivalence is a measurable equivalence. -/
def toMeasurableEquiv : E ≃ᵐ F where
toEquiv := f
| measurable_toFun := f.continuous.measurable
measurable_invFun := f.symm.continuous.measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-22")] alias toMeasureEquiv := toMeasurableEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_toMeasurableEquiv : (f.toMeasurableEquiv : E → F) = f := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-22")] alias coe_toMeasureEquiv := coe_toMeasurableEquiv
theorem toMeasurableEquiv_symm : f.toMeasurableEquiv.symm = f.symm.toMeasurableEquiv := rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/InnerProductSpace.lean | 34 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Rat
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
This file provides results about the multiplicative structure on `A ⊗[R] B` when `R` is a
commutative (semi)ring and `A` and `B` are both `R`-algebras. On these tensor products,
multiplication is characterized by `(a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)`.
## Main declarations
- `LinearMap.baseChange A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.semiring`: the ring structure on `A ⊗[R] B` for two `R`-algebras `A`, `B`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra`: the `S`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`, for when `A` is
additionally an `S` algebra.
- the structure isomorphisms
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A` (usually used with `S = R` or `S = A`)
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for the tensor product of algebras.
## References
* [C. Kassel, *Quantum Groups* (§II.4)][Kassel1995]
-/
assert_not_exists Equiv.Perm.cycleType
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A) in
/-- `baseChange A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`.
This "base change" operation is also known as "extension of scalars". -/
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_smul : (r • f).baseChange A = r • f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_id : (.id : M →ₗ[R] M).baseChange A = .id := by
ext; simp
lemma baseChange_comp (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
(g ∘ₗ f).baseChange A = g.baseChange A ∘ₗ f.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R M) in
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_one : (1 : Module.End R M).baseChange A = 1 := baseChange_id
lemma baseChange_mul (f g : Module.End R M) :
(f * g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A * g.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R A M N)
/-- `baseChange A e` for `e : M ≃ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`. -/
def _root_.LinearEquiv.baseChange (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.congr (.refl _ _) e
/-- `baseChange` as a linear map.
When `M = N`, this is true more strongly as `Module.End.baseChangeHom`. -/
@[simps]
def baseChangeHom : (M →ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N where
toFun := baseChange A
map_add' := baseChange_add
map_smul' := baseChange_smul
/-- `baseChange` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Module.End.baseChangeHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End A (A ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (LinearMap.baseChangeHom _ _ _ _) (baseChange_one _ _) baseChange_mul
lemma baseChange_pow (f : Module.End R M) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n).baseChange A = f.baseChange A ^ n :=
map_pow (Module.End.baseChangeHom _ _ _) f n
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R A B M N : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_sub : (f - g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A - g.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_sub]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_neg : (-f).baseChange A = -f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_neg]
end Ring
section liftBaseChange
variable {R M N} (A) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module A N] [IsScalarTower R A N]
/--
If `M` is an `R`-module and `N` is an `A`-module, then `A`-linear maps `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N`
correspond to `R` linear maps `M →ₗ[R] N` by composing with `M → A ⊗ M`, `x ↦ 1 ⊗ x`.
-/
noncomputable
def liftBaseChangeEquiv : (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[A] (A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N) :=
(LinearMap.ringLmapEquivSelf _ _ _).symm.trans (AlgebraTensorModule.lift.equiv _ _ _ _ _ _)
/-- If `N` is an `A` module, we may lift a linear map `M →ₗ[R] N` to `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N` -/
noncomputable
abbrev liftBaseChange (l : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N :=
LinearMap.liftBaseChangeEquiv A l
@[simp]
lemma liftBaseChange_tmul (l : M →ₗ[R] N) (x y) : l.liftBaseChange A (x ⊗ₜ y) = x • l y := rfl
lemma liftBaseChange_one_tmul (l : M →ₗ[R] N) (y) : l.liftBaseChange A (1 ⊗ₜ y) = l y := by simp
@[simp]
lemma liftBaseChangeEquiv_symm_apply (l : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N) (x) :
(liftBaseChangeEquiv A).symm l x = l (1 ⊗ₜ x) := rfl
lemma liftBaseChange_comp {P} [AddCommMonoid P] [Module A P] [Module R P] [IsScalarTower R A P]
(l : M →ₗ[R] N) (l' : N →ₗ[A] P) :
l' ∘ₗ l.liftBaseChange A = (l'.restrictScalars R ∘ₗ l).liftBaseChange A := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
lemma range_liftBaseChange (l : M →ₗ[R] N) :
LinearMap.range (l.liftBaseChange A) = Submodule.span A (LinearMap.range l) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using TensorProduct.induction_on
· simp
· rw [LinearMap.liftBaseChange_tmul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· rw [map_add]
exact add_mem ‹_› ‹_›
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨1 ⊗ₜ x, by simp⟩
end liftBaseChange
end LinearMap
namespace Module.End
open LinearMap
variable (R M N : Type*)
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
/-- The map `LinearMap.lTensorHom` which sends `f ↦ 1 ⊗ f` as a morphism of algebras. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def lTensorAlgHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End R (N ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (lTensorHom (M := N)) (lTensor_id N M) (lTensor_mul N)
/-- The map `LinearMap.rTensorHom` which sends `f ↦ f ⊗ 1` as a morphism of algebras. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def rTensorAlgHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
.ofLinearMap (rTensorHom (M := N)) (rTensor_id N M) (rTensor_mul N)
end Module.End
namespace Algebra
namespace TensorProduct
universe uR uS uA uB uC uD uE uF
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS}
variable {A : Type uA} {B : Type uB} {C : Type uC} {D : Type uD} {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF}
/-!
### The `R`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`
-/
section AddCommMonoidWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance : One (A ⊗[R] B) where one := 1 ⊗ₜ 1
theorem one_def : (1 : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) :=
rfl
instance instAddCommMonoidWithOne : AddCommMonoidWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
natCast n := n ⊗ₜ 1
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ n := by simp [add_tmul, one_def]
add_comm := add_comm
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (n : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
theorem natCast_def' (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (n : B) := by
rw [natCast_def, ← nsmul_one, smul_tmul, nsmul_one]
end AddCommMonoidWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
/-- (Implementation detail)
The multiplication map on `A ⊗[R] B`,
as an `R`-bilinear map.
-/
@[irreducible]
def mul : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
TensorProduct.map₂ (LinearMap.mul R A) (LinearMap.mul R B)
unseal mul in
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
-- providing this instance separately makes some downstream code substantially faster
instance instMul : Mul (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul a b := mul a b
unseal mul in
@[simp]
theorem tmul_mul_tmul (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁ * a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
unseal mul in
theorem _root_.SemiconjBy.tmul {a₁ a₂ a₃ : A} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : B}
(ha : SemiconjBy a₁ a₂ a₃) (hb : SemiconjBy b₁ b₂ b₃) :
SemiconjBy (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) (a₃ ⊗ₜ[R] b₃) :=
congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ[R] ·) ha.eq hb.eq
nonrec theorem _root_.Commute.tmul {a₁ a₂ : A} {b₁ b₂ : B}
(ha : Commute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) :=
ha.tmul hb
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
-- we want `isScalarTower_right` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) isScalarTower_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[IsScalarTower S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : IsScalarTower S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_assoc r x y := by
change r • x * y = r • (x * y)
induction y with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, smul_mul_assoc]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
-- we want `Algebra.to_smulCommClass` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) sMulCommClass_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[SMulCommClass S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : SMulCommClass S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_comm r x y := by
change r • (x * y) = x * r • y
induction y with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, mul_smul_comm]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
protected theorem one_mul (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (1 ⊗ₜ 1) x = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp +contextual
protected theorem mul_one (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul x (1 ⊗ₜ 1) = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp +contextual
instance instNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
end NonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
unseal mul in
protected theorem mul_assoc (x y z : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) := by
-- restate as an equality of morphisms so that we can use `ext`
suffices LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul ∘ₗ mul =
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ LinearMap.lflip <| LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul.flip ∘ₗ mul).flip by
exact DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun this x) y) z
ext xa xb ya yb za zb
exact congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ ·) (mul_assoc xa ya za) (mul_assoc xb yb zb)
instance instNonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
instance instSemiring : Semiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
natCast_zero := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
natCast_succ := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ
@[simp]
theorem tmul_pow (a : A) (b : B) (k : ℕ) : a ⊗ₜ[R] b ^ k = (a ^ k) ⊗ₜ[R] (b ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [one_def]
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
/-- The ring morphism `A →+* A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
@[simps]
def includeLeftRingHom : A →+* A ⊗[R] B where
toFun a := a ⊗ₜ 1
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [add_tmul]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
variable [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S A]
instance leftAlgebra [SMulCommClass R S A] : Algebra S (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ commutes' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', ← one_def, mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc, mul_one,
one_mul]
smul_def' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', smul_mul_assoc, ← one_def, one_mul]
algebraMap := TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap S A) }
example : (Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ (ℕ ⊗[ℕ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
-- This is for the `undergrad.yaml` list.
/-- The tensor product of two `R`-algebras is an `R`-algebra. -/
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (A ⊗[R] B) :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (r : S) :
algebraMap S (A ⊗[R] B) r = (algebraMap S A) r ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_apply' (r : R) :
algebraMap R (A ⊗[R] B) r = 1 ⊗ₜ algebraMap R B r := by
rw [algebraMap_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_tmul]
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
def includeLeft [SMulCommClass R S A] : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B :=
{ includeLeftRingHom with commutes' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem includeLeft_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (a : A) :
(includeLeft : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B) a = a ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
/-- The algebra morphism `B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `b` to `1 ⊗ₜ b`. -/
def includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B where
toFun b := 1 ⊗ₜ b
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [tmul_add]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
commutes' r := by simp only [algebraMap_apply']
@[simp]
theorem includeRight_apply (b : B) : (includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B) b = 1 ⊗ₜ b :=
rfl
theorem includeLeftRingHom_comp_algebraMap :
(includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) : R →+* A ⊗[R] B) =
includeRight.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R B) := by
ext
simp
section ext
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- A version of `TensorProduct.ext` for `AlgHom`.
Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of `Algebra.TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply
lemmas specific to `A →ₐ[S] _` and `B →ₐ[R] _`; notably this allows recursion into nested tensor
products of algebras.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ext ⦃f g : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C⦄
(ha : f.comp includeLeft = g.comp includeLeft)
(hb : (f.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = (g.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight) :
f = g := by
apply AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective
ext a b
have := congr_arg₂ HMul.hMul (AlgHom.congr_fun ha a) (AlgHom.congr_fun hb b)
dsimp at *
rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, tmul_mul_tmul, one_mul, mul_one] at this
theorem ext' {g h : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C} (H : ∀ a b, g (a ⊗ₜ b) = h (a ⊗ₜ b)) : g = h :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _)
end ext
end Semiring
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance instAddCommGroupWithOne : AddCommGroupWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
intCast z := z ⊗ₜ (1 : B)
intCast_ofNat n := by simp [natCast_def]
intCast_negSucc n := by simp [natCast_def, add_tmul, neg_tmul, one_def]
theorem intCast_def (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (z : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocRing : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section NonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonAssocRing : NonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommGroupWithOne
end NonAssocRing
section NonUnitalRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalRing : NonUnitalRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalSemiring
end NonUnitalRing
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommSemiring : CommSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := inferInstance
mul_comm x y := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₁ b₁
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₂ b₂
simp [mul_comm]
· intro a₂ b₂ ha hb
simp [mul_add, add_mul, ha, hb]
· intro x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂
simp [mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := instSemiring
__ := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def' (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (z : B) := by
rw [intCast_def, ← zsmul_one, smul_tmul, zsmul_one]
-- verify there are no diamonds
example : (instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B)).toAddCommGroup = addCommGroup := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
-- fails at `with_reducible_and_instances rfl` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Ring.toIntAlgebra _ : Algebra ℤ (ℤ ⊗[ℤ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommRing B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommRing : CommRing (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ toRing := inferInstance
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end CommRing
section RightAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
/-- `S ⊗[R] T` has a `T`-algebra structure. This is not a global instance or else the action of
`S` on `S ⊗[R] S` would be ambiguous. -/
abbrev rightAlgebra : Algebra B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
includeRight.toRingHom.toAlgebra' fun b x => by
suffices LinearMap.mulLeft R (includeRight b) = LinearMap.mulRight R (includeRight b) from
congr($this x)
ext xa xb
simp [mul_comm]
attribute [local instance] TensorProduct.rightAlgebra
instance right_isScalarTower : IsScalarTower R B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun r => (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight.commutes r).symm
end RightAlgebra
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [Ring A] [Ring B] : Ring (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the comm_ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely comm_rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [CommRing A] [CommRing B] : CommRing (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-!
We now build the structure maps for the symmetric monoidal category of `R`-algebras.
-/
section Monoidal
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
/-- To check a linear map preserves multiplication, it suffices to check it on pure tensors. See
`algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct` for a bundled version. -/
lemma _root_.LinearMap.map_mul_of_map_mul_tmul {f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C}
(hf : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(x y : A ⊗[R] B) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
f.map_mul_iff.2 (by
-- these instances are needed by the statement of `ext`, but not by the current definition.
letI : Algebra R C := RestrictScalars.algebra R S C
letI : IsScalarTower R S C := RestrictScalars.isScalarTower R S C
ext
dsimp
exact hf _ _ _ _) x y
/-- Build an algebra morphism from a linear map out of a tensor product, and evidence that on pure
tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap f h_one (f.map_mul_of_map_mul_tmul h_mul)
@[simp]
theorem algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a tensor product, and evidence
that on pure tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C :=
{ algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C) h_mul h_one, f with }
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
variable [Algebra R C]
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a triple tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct (f : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₗ[R] D)
(h_mul :
∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C),
f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂) ⊗ₜ (c₁ * c₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁ ⊗ₜ c₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂ ⊗ₜ c₂))
(h_one : f (((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : C)) = 1) :
(A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv f h_one <| f.map_mul_iff.2 <| by
ext
dsimp
exact h_mul _ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D) x = f x :=
rfl
section lift
variable [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- The forward direction of the universal property of tensor products of algebras; any algebra
morphism from the tensor product can be factored as the product of two algebra morphisms that
commute.
See `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv` for the fact that every morphism factors this way. -/
def lift (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct
(AlgebraTensorModule.lift <|
letI restr : (C →ₗ[S] C) →ₗ[S] _ :=
{ toFun := (·.restrictScalars R)
map_add' := fun _ _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl }
LinearMap.flip <| (restr ∘ₗ LinearMap.mul S C ∘ₗ f.toLinearMap).flip ∘ₗ g)
(fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => show f (a₁ * a₂) * g (b₁ * b₂) = f a₁ * g b₁ * (f a₂ * g b₂) by
rw [map_mul, map_mul, (hfg a₂ b₁).mul_mul_mul_comm])
(show f 1 * g 1 = 1 by rw [map_one, map_one, one_mul])
@[simp]
theorem lift_tmul (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y))
(a : A) (b : B) :
lift f g hfg (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a * g b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_includeLeft_includeRight :
lift includeLeft includeRight (fun _ _ => (Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)) =
.id S (A ⊗[R] B) := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeLeft (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
(lift f g hfg).comp includeLeft = f :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
((lift f g hfg).restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = g :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
/-- The universal property of the tensor product of algebras.
Pairs of algebra morphisms that commute are equivalent to algebra morphisms from the tensor product.
This is `Algebra.TensorProduct.lift` as an equivalence.
See also `GradedTensorProduct.liftEquiv` for an alternative commutativity requirement for graded
algebra. -/
@[simps]
def liftEquiv : {fg : (A →ₐ[S] C) × (B →ₐ[R] C) // ∀ x y, Commute (fg.1 x) (fg.2 y)}
≃ ((A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C) where
toFun fg := lift fg.val.1 fg.val.2 fg.prop
invFun f' := ⟨(f'.comp includeLeft, (f'.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight), fun _ _ =>
((Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)).map f'⟩
left_inv fg := by ext <;> simp
right_inv f' := by ext <;> simp
end lift
end
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
variable [Semiring E] [Algebra R E] [Algebra S E] [IsScalarTower R S E]
variable [Semiring F] [Algebra R F]
section
variable (R A)
/-- The base ring is a left identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected nonrec def lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (TensorProduct.lid R A) (by
simp only [mul_smul, lid_tmul, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc, Algebra.mul_smul_comm]
simp_rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm]
simp)
(by simp [Algebra.smul_def])
@[simp] theorem lid_toLinearEquiv :
(TensorProduct.lid R A).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.lid R A := rfl
variable {R} {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) : TensorProduct.lid R A (r ⊗ₜ a) = r • a := rfl
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_symm_apply (a : A) : (TensorProduct.lid R A).symm a = 1 ⊗ₜ a := rfl
variable (S)
/-- The base ring is a right identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
Note that if `A` is commutative this can be instantiated with `S = A`.
-/
protected nonrec def rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A)
(fun a₁ a₂ r₁ r₂ => smul_mul_smul_comm r₁ a₁ r₂ a₂ |>.symm)
(one_smul R _)
@[simp] theorem rid_toLinearEquiv :
(TensorProduct.rid R S A).toLinearEquiv = AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A := rfl
variable {R A} in
@[simp]
theorem rid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) : TensorProduct.rid R S A (a ⊗ₜ r) = r • a := rfl
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem rid_symm_apply (a : A) : (TensorProduct.rid R S A).symm a = a ⊗ₜ 1 := rfl
section CompatibleSMul
variable (R S A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable [SMulCommClass R S A] [CompatibleSMul R S A B]
/-- If A and B are both R- and S-algebras and their actions on them commute,
and if the S-action on `A ⊗[R] B` can switch between the two factors, then there is a
canonical S-algebra homomorphism from `A ⊗[S] B` to `A ⊗[R] B`. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul : A ⊗[S] B →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B :=
.ofLinearMap (_root_.TensorProduct.mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B) rfl fun x ↦
x.induction_on (by simp) (fun _ _ y ↦ y.induction_on (by simp) (by simp)
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simp only [mul_add, map_add, h, h'])
fun _ _ h h' _ ↦ by simp only [add_mul, map_add, h, h']
@[simp] theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul (m n) : mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_surjective : Function.Surjective (mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B) :=
_root_.TensorProduct.mapOfCompatibleSMul_surjective R S A B
attribute [local instance] SMulCommClass.symm
/-- `mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B` is also A-linear. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul' : A ⊗[S] B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
.ofLinearMap (_root_.TensorProduct.mapOfCompatibleSMul' R S A B) rfl
(map_mul <| mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B)
/-- If the R- and S-actions on A and B satisfy `CompatibleSMul` both ways,
then `A ⊗[S] B` is canonically isomorphic to `A ⊗[R] B`. -/
def equivOfCompatibleSMul [CompatibleSMul S R A B] : A ⊗[S] B ≃ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B where
__ := mapOfCompatibleSMul R S A B
invFun := mapOfCompatibleSMul S R A B
__ := _root_.TensorProduct.equivOfCompatibleSMul R S A B
variable [Algebra R S] [CompatibleSMul R S S A] [CompatibleSMul S R S A]
omit [SMulCommClass R S A]
/-- If the R- and S- action on S and A satisfy `CompatibleSMul` both ways,
then `S ⊗[R] A` is canonically isomorphic to `A`. -/
def lidOfCompatibleSMul : S ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[S] A :=
(equivOfCompatibleSMul R S S A).symm.trans (TensorProduct.lid _ _)
theorem lidOfCompatibleSMul_tmul (s a) : lidOfCompatibleSMul R S A (s ⊗ₜ[R] a) = s • a := rfl
instance {R M N : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
[Module R M] [Module R N] [Module ℚ M] [Module ℚ N] : CompatibleSMul R ℚ M N where
smul_tmul q m n := by
suffices q.den • ((q • m) ⊗ₜ[R] n) = q.den • (m ⊗ₜ[R] (q • n)) from
smul_right_injective (M ⊗[R] N) (c := q.den) q.den_nz <| by norm_cast
rw [smul_tmul', ← tmul_smul, ← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc, nsmul_eq_mul, Rat.den_mul_eq_num]
norm_cast
rw [smul_tmul]
end CompatibleSMul
section
variable (B)
unseal mul in
/-- The tensor product of R-algebras is commutative, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected def comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (_root_.TensorProduct.comm R A B) (fun _ _ _ _ => rfl) rfl
@[simp] theorem comm_toLinearEquiv :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.comm R A B).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.comm R A B := rfl
variable {A B} in
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
TensorProduct.comm R A B (a ⊗ₜ b) = b ⊗ₜ a :=
rfl
variable {A B} in
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B).symm (b ⊗ₜ a) = a ⊗ₜ b :=
rfl
theorem comm_symm :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B).symm = TensorProduct.comm R B A := by
ext; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comm_comp_includeLeft :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A).comp includeLeft = includeRight := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comm_comp_includeRight :
(TensorProduct.comm R A B : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A).comp includeRight = includeLeft := rfl
theorem adjoin_tmul_eq_top : adjoin R { t : A ⊗[R] B | ∃ a b, a ⊗ₜ[R] b = t } = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp <| (top_le_iff.mpr <| span_tmul_eq_top R A B).trans (span_le_adjoin R _)
end
section
variable {R A}
unseal mul in
theorem assoc_aux_1 (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C) :
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) (((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂)) ⊗ₜ[R] (c₁ * c₂)) =
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) ⊗ₜ[R] c₁) *
(TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) ⊗ₜ[R] c₂) :=
rfl
theorem assoc_aux_2 : (TensorProduct.assoc R A B C) ((1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1 :=
rfl
variable (R A B C)
-- Porting note: much nicer than Lean 3 proof
/-- The associator for tensor product of R-algebras, as an algebra isomorphism. -/
protected def assoc : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B ⊗[R] C :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct
(_root_.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C)
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_1
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc_aux_2
@[simp] theorem assoc_toLinearEquiv :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C := rfl
variable {A B C}
@[simp]
theorem assoc_tmul (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) :
Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C ((a ⊗ₜ b) ⊗ₜ c) = a ⊗ₜ (b ⊗ₜ c) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem assoc_symm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc R A B C).symm (a ⊗ₜ (b ⊗ₜ c)) = (a ⊗ₜ b) ⊗ₜ c :=
rfl
end
section
variable (T A B : Type*) [CommSemiring T] [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B]
[Algebra R T] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra T A] [IsScalarTower R T A] [Algebra S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower S T A]
/-- The natural isomorphism `A ⊗[S] (S ⊗[R] B) ≃ₐ[T] A ⊗[R] B`. -/
noncomputable def cancelBaseChange : A ⊗[S] (S ⊗[R] B) ≃ₐ[T] A ⊗[R] B :=
AlgEquiv.symm <| AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.cancelBaseChange R S T A B).symm
(by simp [Algebra.TensorProduct.one_def]) <|
LinearMap.map_mul_of_map_mul_tmul (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ by simp)
@[simp]
lemma cancelBaseChange_tmul (a : A) (s : S) (b : B) :
Algebra.TensorProduct.cancelBaseChange R S T A B (a ⊗ₜ (s ⊗ₜ b)) = (s • a) ⊗ₜ b :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.cancelBaseChange_tmul R S T a b s
@[simp]
lemma cancelBaseChange_symm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
(Algebra.TensorProduct.cancelBaseChange R S T A B).symm (a ⊗ₜ b) = a ⊗ₜ (1 ⊗ₜ b) :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.cancelBaseChange_symm_tmul R S T a b
end
variable {R S A}
/-- The tensor product of a pair of algebra morphisms. -/
def map (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C ⊗[R] D :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (AlgebraTensorModule.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap) (by simp)
(by simp [one_def])
@[simp]
theorem map_tmul (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) (a : A) (b : B) : map f g (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a ⊗ₜ g b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (.id S A) (.id R B) = .id S _ :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
theorem map_comp
(f₂ : C →ₐ[S] E) (f₁ : A →ₐ[S] C) (g₂ : D →ₐ[R] F) (g₁ : B →ₐ[R] D) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
lemma map_id_comp (g₂ : D →ₐ[R] F) (g₁ : B →ₐ[R] D) :
map (AlgHom.id S A) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map (AlgHom.id S A) g₂).comp (map (AlgHom.id S A) g₁) :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
lemma map_comp_id
(f₂ : C →ₐ[S] E) (f₁ : A →ₐ[S] C) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (AlgHom.id R E) = (map f₂ (AlgHom.id R E)).comp (map f₁ (AlgHom.id R E)) :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_includeLeft (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp includeLeft = includeLeft.comp f :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_restrictScalars_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) :
((map f g).restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = includeRight.comp g :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[R] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp includeRight = includeRight.comp g :=
map_restrictScalars_comp_includeRight f g
theorem map_range (f : A →ₐ[R] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).range = (includeLeft.comp f).range ⊔ (includeRight.comp g).range := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← map_top, ← adjoin_tmul_eq_top, ← adjoin_image, adjoin_le_iff]
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
rw [map_tmul, ← mul_one (f a), ← one_mul (g b), ← tmul_mul_tmul]
exact mul_mem_sup (AlgHom.mem_range_self _ a) (AlgHom.mem_range_self _ b)
· rw [← map_comp_includeLeft f g, ← map_comp_includeRight f g]
exact sup_le (AlgHom.range_comp_le_range _ _) (AlgHom.range_comp_le_range _ _)
lemma comm_comp_map (f : A →ₐ[R] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) :
(TensorProduct.comm R C D : C ⊗[R] D →ₐ[R] D ⊗[R] C).comp (Algebra.TensorProduct.map f g) =
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map g f).comp (TensorProduct.comm R A B).toAlgHom := by
| ext <;> rfl
lemma comm_comp_map_apply (f : A →ₐ[R] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] D) (x) :
TensorProduct.comm R C D (Algebra.TensorProduct.map f g x) =
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map g f) (TensorProduct.comm R A B x) :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 1,049 | 1,053 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Justus Springer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Spaces
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.DenseSubsite.Basic
/-!
# Coverings and sieves; from sheaves on sites and sheaves on spaces
In this file, we connect coverings in a topological space to sieves in the associated Grothendieck
topology, in preparation of connecting the sheaf condition on sites to the various sheaf conditions
on spaces.
We also specialize results about sheaves on sites to sheaves on spaces; we show that the inclusion
functor from a topological basis to `TopologicalSpace.Opens` is cover dense, that open maps
induce cover preserving functors, and that open embeddings induce continuous functors.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Topology
universe w v u
namespace TopCat.Presheaf
variable {X : TopCat.{w}}
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `U`, we obtain a covering family of open sets in `X`, by taking as index
type the type of dependent pairs `(V, f)`, where `f : V ⟶ U` is in `R`.
-/
def coveringOfPresieve (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U) : (ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) → Opens X :=
fun f => f.1
@[simp]
theorem coveringOfPresieve_apply (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U) (f : Σ V, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) :
coveringOfPresieve U R f = f.1 := rfl
namespace coveringOfPresieve
variable (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U)
/-- If `R` is a presieve in the grothendieck topology on `Opens X`, the covering family associated
to `R` really is _covering_, i.e. the union of all open sets equals `U`.
-/
theorem iSup_eq_of_mem_grothendieck (hR : Sieve.generate R ∈ Opens.grothendieckTopology X U) :
iSup (coveringOfPresieve U R) = U := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup_le ?_
intro f
exact f.2.1.le
intro x hxU
rw [Opens.coe_iSup, Set.mem_iUnion]
obtain ⟨V, iVU, ⟨W, iVW, iWU, hiWU, -⟩, hxV⟩ := hR x hxU
exact ⟨⟨W, ⟨iWU, hiWU⟩⟩, iVW.le hxV⟩
end coveringOfPresieve
/-- Given a family of opens `U : ι → Opens X` and any open `Y : Opens X`, we obtain a presieve
on `Y` by declaring that a morphism `f : V ⟶ Y` is a member of the presieve if and only if
there exists an index `i : ι` such that `V = U i`.
-/
def presieveOfCoveringAux {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X) (Y : Opens X) : Presieve Y :=
fun V _ => ∃ i, V = U i
/-- Take `Y` to be `iSup U` and obtain a presieve over `iSup U`. -/
def presieveOfCovering {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X) : Presieve (iSup U) :=
presieveOfCoveringAux U (iSup U)
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `Y`, if we take its associated family of opens via
`coveringOfPresieve` (which may not cover `Y` if `R` is not covering), and take
the presieve on `Y` associated to the family of opens via `presieveOfCoveringAux`,
then we get back the original presieve `R`. -/
@[simp]
theorem covering_presieve_eq_self {Y : Opens X} (R : Presieve Y) :
presieveOfCoveringAux (coveringOfPresieve Y R) Y = R := by
funext Z
ext f
exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨_, f', h⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim f f'], fun h => ⟨⟨Z, f, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
namespace presieveOfCovering
variable {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X)
/-- The sieve generated by `presieveOfCovering U` is a member of the grothendieck topology.
-/
theorem mem_grothendieckTopology :
Sieve.generate (presieveOfCovering U) ∈ Opens.grothendieckTopology X (iSup U) := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, hxi⟩ := Opens.mem_iSup.mp hx
exact ⟨U i, Opens.leSupr U i, ⟨U i, 𝟙 _, Opens.leSupr U i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, Category.id_comp _⟩, hxi⟩
/-- An index `i : ι` can be turned into a dependent pair `(V, f)`, where `V` is an open set and
`f : V ⟶ iSup U` is a member of `presieveOfCovering U f`.
-/
def homOfIndex (i : ι) : ΣV, { f : V ⟶ iSup U // presieveOfCovering U f } :=
⟨U i, Opens.leSupr U i, i, rfl⟩
/-- By using the axiom of choice, a dependent pair `(V, f)` where `f : V ⟶ iSup U` is a member of
`presieveOfCovering U f` can be turned into an index `i : ι`, such that `V = U i`.
-/
def indexOfHom (f : Σ V, { f : V ⟶ iSup U // presieveOfCovering U f }) : ι :=
f.2.2.choose
theorem indexOfHom_spec (f : Σ V, { f : V ⟶ iSup U // presieveOfCovering U f }) :
f.1 = U (indexOfHom U f) :=
f.2.2.choose_spec
end presieveOfCovering
end TopCat.Presheaf
namespace TopCat.Opens
variable {X : TopCat} {ι : Type*}
theorem coverDense_iff_isBasis [Category ι] (B : ι ⥤ Opens X) :
B.IsCoverDense (Opens.grothendieckTopology X) ↔ Opens.IsBasis (Set.range B.obj) := by
rw [Opens.isBasis_iff_nbhd]
constructor
· intro hd U x hx; rcases hd.1 U x hx with ⟨V, f, ⟨i, f₁, f₂, _⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨B.obj i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, f₁.le hV, f₂.le⟩
intro hb; constructor; intro U x hx; rcases hb hx with ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hx, hi⟩
exact ⟨B.obj i, ⟨⟨hi⟩⟩, ⟨⟨i, 𝟙 _, ⟨⟨hi⟩⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hx⟩
theorem coverDense_inducedFunctor {B : ι → Opens X} (h : Opens.IsBasis (Set.range B)) :
(inducedFunctor B).IsCoverDense (Opens.grothendieckTopology X) :=
(coverDense_iff_isBasis _).2 h
end TopCat.Opens
section IsOpenEmbedding
open TopCat.Presheaf Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f : X ⟶ Y} {F : Y.Presheaf C}
theorem Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.compatiblePreserving (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
CompatiblePreserving (Opens.grothendieckTopology Y) hf.isOpenMap.functor := by
haveI : Mono f := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective f).mpr hf.injective
apply compatiblePreservingOfDownwardsClosed
intro U V i
refine ⟨(Opens.map f).obj V, eqToIso <| Opens.ext <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset fun x h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := i.le h
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem IsOpenMap.coverPreserving (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
CoverPreserving (Opens.grothendieckTopology X) (Opens.grothendieckTopology Y) hf.functor := by
constructor
rintro U S hU _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨V, i, hV, hxV⟩ := hU x hx
exact ⟨_, hf.functor.map i, ⟨_, i, 𝟙 _, hV, rfl⟩, Set.mem_image_of_mem f hxV⟩
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.functor_isContinuous (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
h.isOpenMap.functor.IsContinuous (Opens.grothendieckTopology X)
(Opens.grothendieckTopology Y) := by
apply Functor.isContinuous_of_coverPreserving
· exact h.compatiblePreserving
· exact h.isOpenMap.coverPreserving
theorem TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_of_isOpenEmbedding (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (hF : F.IsSheaf) :
IsSheaf (h.isOpenMap.functor.op ⋙ F) := by
| have := h.functor_isContinuous
exact Functor.op_comp_isSheaf _ _ _ ⟨_, hF⟩
variable (f)
instance : RepresentablyFlat (Opens.map f) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafCondition/Sites.lean | 171 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Dagur Asgeirsson, Filippo A. E. Nuccio, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHausLike.Limits
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Stonean.Basic
/-!
# Explicit limits and colimits
This file applies the general API for explicit limits and colimits in `CompHausLike P` (see
the file `Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHausLike.Limits`) to the special case of `Stonean`.
-/
universe w u
open CategoryTheory Limits CompHausLike Topology
namespace Stonean
instance : HasExplicitFiniteCoproducts.{w, u} (fun Y ↦ ExtremallyDisconnected Y) where
hasProp _ := { hasProp := show ExtremallyDisconnected (Σ (_a : _), _) from inferInstance}
variable {X Y Z : Stonean} {f : X ⟶ Z} (i : Y ⟶ Z) (hi : IsOpenEmbedding f)
include hi
lemma extremallyDisconnected_preimage : ExtremallyDisconnected (i ⁻¹' (Set.range f)) where
open_closure U hU := by
have h : IsClopen (i ⁻¹' (Set.range f)) :=
⟨IsClosed.preimage i.hom.continuous (isCompact_range f.hom.continuous).isClosed,
IsOpen.preimage i.hom.continuous hi.isOpen_range⟩
rw [← (closure U).preimage_image_eq Subtype.coe_injective,
← h.1.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.closure_image_eq U]
exact isOpen_induced (ExtremallyDisconnected.open_closure _
(h.2.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap U hU))
lemma extremallyDisconnected_pullback : ExtremallyDisconnected {xy : X × Y | f xy.1 = i xy.2} :=
have := extremallyDisconnected_preimage i hi
let e := (TopCat.pullbackHomeoPreimage i i.hom.2 f hi.isEmbedding).symm
let e' : {xy : X × Y | f xy.1 = i xy.2} ≃ₜ {xy : Y × X | i xy.1 = f xy.2} := by
exact TopCat.homeoOfIso
((TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f i).symm ≪≫ pullbackSymmetry _ _ ≪≫
(TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype i f))
extremallyDisconnected_of_homeo (e.trans e'.symm)
instance : HasExplicitPullbacksOfInclusions (fun (Y : TopCat.{u}) ↦ ExtremallyDisconnected Y) := by
apply CompHausLike.hasPullbacksOfInclusions
intro _ _ _ _ _ hi
exact ⟨extremallyDisconnected_pullback _ hi⟩
example : FinitaryExtensive Stonean.{u} := inferInstance
noncomputable example : PreservesFiniteCoproducts Stonean.toCompHaus := inferInstance
noncomputable example : PreservesFiniteCoproducts Stonean.toProfinite := inferInstance
end Stonean
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Stonean/Limits.lean | 223 | 234 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x : Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
rcases destruct (f a) with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
rcases destruct c with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp
· simpa using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
simpa using bind_pure id s
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp only [BisimO, ret_bind]; generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· rcases destruct (g t) with b | cb <;> simp
· simpa [BisimO] using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
obtain ⟨m', h⟩ := of_results_think h1
obtain ⟨h1, e⟩ := h
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction k generalizing s with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _
<;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· simp only [think_bind, results_think_iff] at h
let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH h
rw [e']
exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h
let ⟨a, _, _, h1, h2, _⟩ := of_results_bind h
⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : s ~> a)
(h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b := fun b' bB => by
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩
rw [← h1 a's] at ba'; exact h2 ba'
instance monad : Monad Computation where
map := @map
pure := @pure
bind := @bind
instance : LawfulMonad Computation := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := @map_id)
(bind_pure_comp := @bind_pure)
(pure_bind := @ret_bind)
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : Computation α) : f <$> c = map f c :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a) : (return a : Computation α) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_pure' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> pure a = pure (f a) :=
map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (s), f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) :=
map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : Computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s := by
rw [← bind_pure]; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
rw [← bind_pure] at h
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
exact ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) [Terminates s] : Terminates (map f s) := by
rw [← bind_pure]; exact terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (α := β) (f (get s))))
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) : Terminates (map f s) ↔ Terminates s :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨_, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@Computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orElse (c₁ : Computation α) (c₂ : Unit → Computation α) : Computation α :=
@Computation.corec α (Computation α × Computation α)
(fun ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ =>
match destruct c₁ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₁' =>
match destruct c₂ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₂' => Sum.inr (c₁', c₂'))
(c₁, c₂ ())
instance instAlternativeComputation : Alternative Computation :=
{ Computation.monad with
orElse := @orElse
failure := @empty }
@[simp]
theorem ret_orElse (a : α) (c₂ : Computation α) : (pure a <|> c₂) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_pure (c₁ : Computation α) (a : α) : (think c₁ <|> pure a) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_think (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : (think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem empty_orElse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_empty (c : Computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def Equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : Prop :=
∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
/-- equivalence relation for computations -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~ " => Equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl (s : Computation α) : s ~ s := fun _ => Iff.rfl
|
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm {s t : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s := fun h a => (h a).symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans {s t u : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u := fun h1 h2 a =>
(h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : Computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t := fun a' =>
⟨fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h1]; exact h2, fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h2]; exact h1⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 817 | 829 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Aaron Anderson, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
/-!
# support of a permutation
## Main definitions
In the following, `f g : Equiv.Perm α`.
* `Equiv.Perm.Disjoint`: two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if every element is fixed
either by `f`, or by `g`.
Equivalently, `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` iff their `support` are disjoint.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsSwap`: `f = swap x y` for `x ≠ y`.
* `Equiv.Perm.support`: the elements `x : α` that are not fixed by `f`.
Assume `α` is a Fintype:
* `Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one f` says that `f` has
strictly less than `Fintype.card α - 1` fixed points, unless `f = 1`.
(Equivalently, `f.support` has at least 2 elements.)
-/
open Equiv Finset Function
namespace Equiv.Perm
variable {α : Type*}
section Disjoint
/-- Two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if their supports are disjoint, i.e.,
every element is fixed either by `f`, or by `g`. -/
def Disjoint (f g : Perm α) :=
∀ x, f x = x ∨ g x = x
variable {f g h : Perm α}
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm : Disjoint f g → Disjoint g f := by simp only [Disjoint, or_comm, imp_self]
theorem Disjoint.symmetric : Symmetric (@Disjoint α) := fun _ _ => Disjoint.symm
instance : IsSymm (Perm α) Disjoint :=
⟨Disjoint.symmetric⟩
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint f g ↔ Disjoint g f :=
⟨Disjoint.symm, Disjoint.symm⟩
theorem Disjoint.commute (h : Disjoint f g) : Commute f g :=
Equiv.ext fun x =>
(h x).elim
(fun hf =>
(h (g x)).elim (fun hg => by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]) fun hg => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, g.injective hg])
fun hg =>
(h (f x)).elim (fun hf => by simp [mul_apply, f.injective hf, hg]) fun hf => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_left (f : Perm α) : Disjoint 1 f := fun _ => Or.inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_right (f : Perm α) : Disjoint f 1 := fun _ => Or.inr rfl
theorem disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq : Disjoint f g ↔ ∀ x : α, f x = x ∨ g x = x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_refl_iff : Disjoint f f ↔ f = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ disjoint_one_left 1⟩
ext x
rcases h x with hx | hx <;> simp [hx]
theorem Disjoint.inv_left (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f⁻¹ g := by
intro x
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_comm]
exact h x
theorem Disjoint.inv_right (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f g⁻¹ :=
h.symm.inv_left.symm
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_left_iff : Disjoint f⁻¹ g ↔ Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.inv_left⟩
convert h.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_right_iff : Disjoint f g⁻¹ ↔ Disjoint f g := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_inv_left_iff, disjoint_comm]
theorem Disjoint.mul_left (H1 : Disjoint f h) (H2 : Disjoint g h) : Disjoint (f * g) h := fun x =>
by cases H1 x <;> cases H2 x <;> simp [*]
theorem Disjoint.mul_right (H1 : Disjoint f g) (H2 : Disjoint f h) : Disjoint f (g * h) := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact H1.symm.mul_left H2.symm
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: make it `@[simp]`
theorem disjoint_conj (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) ↔ Disjoint f g :=
(h⁻¹).forall_congr fun {_} ↦ by simp only [mul_apply, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem Disjoint.conj (H : Disjoint f g) (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) :=
(disjoint_conj h).2 H
theorem disjoint_prod_right (l : List (Perm α)) (h : ∀ g ∈ l, Disjoint f g) :
Disjoint f l.prod := by
induction' l with g l ih
· exact disjoint_one_right _
· rw [List.prod_cons]
exact (h _ List.mem_cons_self).mul_right (ih fun g hg => h g (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))
theorem disjoint_noncommProd_right {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j))
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, g.Disjoint (k i)) :
Disjoint g (s.noncommProd k (hs)) :=
noncommProd_induction s k hs g.Disjoint (fun _ _ ↦ Disjoint.mul_right) (disjoint_one_right g) hg
open scoped List in
theorem disjoint_prod_perm {l₁ l₂ : List (Perm α)} (hl : l₁.Pairwise Disjoint) (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
hp.prod_eq' <| hl.imp Disjoint.commute
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h1 : (1 : Perm α) ∉ l)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup := by
refine List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem ?_ h2
intro τ σ h_mem _ h_disjoint _
subst τ
suffices (σ : Perm α) = 1 by
rw [this] at h_mem
exact h1 h_mem
exact ext fun a => or_self_iff.mp (h_disjoint a)
theorem pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, hfx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n]
theorem zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℤ, (f ^ n) x = x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx]
theorem pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x ∨ (f ^ n) x = f x
| 0 => Or.inl rfl
| n + 1 =>
(pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n).elim
(fun h => Or.inr (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h]))
fun h => Or.inl (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h, hffx])
theorem zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = x ∨ (f ^ i) x = f x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← f.injective.eq_iff, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ', eq_comm,
inv_eq_iff_eq, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ, @eq_comm _ x, or_comm]
exact pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx _
theorem Disjoint.mul_apply_eq_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) {a : α} :
(σ * τ) a = a ↔ σ a = a ∧ τ a = a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [mul_apply, h.2, h.1]⟩
rcases hστ a with hσ | hτ
· exact ⟨hσ, σ.injective (h.trans hσ.symm)⟩
· exact ⟨(congr_arg σ hτ).symm.trans h, hτ⟩
theorem Disjoint.mul_eq_one_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) :
σ * τ = 1 ↔ σ = 1 ∧ τ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, one_apply, hστ.mul_apply_eq_iff, forall_and]
theorem Disjoint.zpow_disjoint_zpow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℤ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) := fun x =>
Or.imp (fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h m)
(fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h n) (hστ x)
theorem Disjoint.pow_disjoint_pow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℕ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) :=
hστ.zpow_disjoint_zpow m n
end Disjoint
section IsSwap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- `f.IsSwap` indicates that the permutation `f` is a transposition of two elements. -/
def IsSwap (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
@[simp]
theorem ofSubtype_swap_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (x y : Subtype p) :
ofSubtype (Equiv.swap x y) = Equiv.swap ↑x ↑y :=
Equiv.ext fun z => by
by_cases hz : p z
· rw [swap_apply_def, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ hz]
split_ifs with hzx hzy
· simp_rw [hzx, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_left]
· simp_rw [hzy, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_right]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
simp [Subtype.ext_iff, *]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _ hz, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop x
intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop y
theorem IsSwap.of_subtype_isSwap {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : Perm (Subtype p)}
(h : f.IsSwap) : (ofSubtype f).IsSwap :=
let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩, hxy⟩ := h
⟨x, y, by
simp only [Ne, Subtype.ext_iff] at hxy
exact hxy.1, by
rw [hxy.2, ofSubtype_swap_eq]⟩
theorem ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (hy : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y) :
f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with h <;> try { simp [*] at * }
end IsSwap
section support
section Set
variable (p q : Perm α)
theorem set_support_inv_eq : { x | p⁻¹ x ≠ x } = { x | p x ≠ x } := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [inv_def, symm_apply_eq, eq_comm]
theorem set_support_apply_mem {p : Perm α} {a : α} :
p a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } ↔ a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } := by simp
theorem set_support_zpow_subset (n : ℤ) : { x | (p ^ n) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
intro hx H
simp [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self H] at hx
theorem set_support_mul_subset : { x | (p * q) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } ∪ { x | q x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
by_cases hq : q x = x <;> simp [hq]
end Set
@[simp]
theorem apply_pow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_pow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_zpow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α}
/-- The `Finset` of nonfixed points of a permutation. -/
def support (f : Perm α) : Finset α := {x | f x ≠ x}
@[simp]
theorem mem_support {x : α} : x ∈ f.support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [support, mem_filter, and_iff_right (mem_univ x)]
theorem not_mem_support {x : α} : x ∉ f.support ↔ f x = x := by simp
theorem coe_support_eq_set_support (f : Perm α) : (f.support : Set α) = { x | f x ≠ x } := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {σ : Perm α} : σ.support = ∅ ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_not,
Equiv.Perm.ext_iff, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem support_one : (1 : Perm α).support = ∅ := by rw [support_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_refl : support (Equiv.refl α) = ∅ :=
support_one
theorem support_congr (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) (h' : ∀ x ∈ g.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ g.support
· exact h' x hx
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx, ← not_mem_support]
exact fun H => hx (h H)
/-- If g and c commute, then g stabilizes the support of c -/
theorem mem_support_iff_of_commute {g c : Perm α} (hgc : Commute g c) (x : α) :
x ∈ c.support ↔ g x ∈ c.support := by
simp only [mem_support, not_iff_not, ← mul_apply]
rw [← hgc, mul_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
theorem support_mul_le (f g : Perm α) : (f * g).support ≤ f.support ⊔ g.support := fun x => by
simp only [sup_eq_union]
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
rw [hg, hf]
theorem exists_mem_support_of_mem_support_prod {l : List (Perm α)} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ l.prod.support) : ∃ f : Perm α, f ∈ l ∧ x ∈ f.support := by
contrapose! hx
simp_rw [mem_support, not_not] at hx ⊢
induction' l with f l ih
· rfl
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply, ih, hx]
· simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons, true_or]
intros f' hf'
refine hx f' ?_
simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons]
exact Or.inr hf'
theorem support_pow_le (σ : Perm α) (n : ℕ) : (σ ^ n).support ≤ σ.support := fun _ h1 =>
mem_support.mpr fun h2 => mem_support.mp h1 (pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h2 n)
@[simp]
theorem support_inv (σ : Perm α) : support σ⁻¹ = σ.support := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, not_iff_not, inv_eq_iff_eq.trans eq_comm, imp_true_iff]
theorem apply_mem_support {x : α} : f x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
rw [mem_support, mem_support, Ne, Ne, apply_eq_iff_eq]
/-- The support of a permutation is invariant -/
theorem isInvariant_of_support_le {c : Perm α} {s : Finset α} (hcs : c.support ≤ s) (x : α) :
x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s := by
by_cases hx' : x ∈ c.support
· simp only [hcs hx', true_iff, hcs (apply_mem_support.mpr hx')]
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx']
/-- A permutation c is the extension of a restriction of g to s
iff its support is contained in s and its restriction is that of g -/
lemma ofSubtype_eq_iff {g c : Equiv.Perm α} {s : Finset α}
(hg : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ g x ∈ s) :
ofSubtype (g.subtypePerm hg) = c ↔
c.support ≤ s ∧
∀ (hc' : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s), c.subtypePerm hc' = g.subtypePerm hg := by
simp only [Equiv.ext_iff, subtypePerm_apply, Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.forall]
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· intro a ha
by_contra ha'
rw [mem_support, ← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha'] at ha
exact ha rfl
· intro _ a ha
rw [← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rintro ⟨hc, h⟩ a
specialize h (isInvariant_of_support_le hc)
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· rw [h a ha, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support]
exact Finset.not_mem_mono hc ha
theorem support_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (u : Perm (Subtype p)) :
(ofSubtype u).support = u.support.map (Function.Embedding.subtype p) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, Finset.mem_map, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_iff_comm, not_exists, not_not]
by_cases hx : p x
· simp only [forall_prop_of_true hx, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem u hx, ← Subtype.coe_inj]
· simp only [forall_prop_of_false hx, true_iff, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem u hx]
theorem mem_support_of_mem_noncommProd_support {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → Perm β}
{comm : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)} {x : β} (hx : x ∈ (s.noncommProd f comm).support) :
∃ a ∈ s, x ∈ (f a).support := by
contrapose! hx
classical
revert hx comm s
apply Finset.induction
· simp
· intro a s ha ih comm hs
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem s a f comm ha]
apply mt (Finset.mem_of_subset (support_mul_le _ _))
rw [Finset.sup_eq_union, Finset.not_mem_union]
exact ⟨hs a (s.mem_insert_self a), ih (fun a ha ↦ hs a (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha))⟩
theorem pow_apply_mem_support {n : ℕ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
| simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, apply_pow_apply_eq_iff]
theorem zpow_apply_mem_support {n : ℤ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Support.lean | 396 | 398 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Pietro Monticone
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Embeddings
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Rat
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Units.DirichletTheorem
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
/-!
# Third Cyclotomic Field
We gather various results about the third cyclotomic field. The following notations are used in this
file: `K` is a number field such that `IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K`, `ζ` is any primitive `3`-rd
root of unity in `K`, `η` is the element in the units of the ring of integers corresponding to `ζ`
and `λ = η - 1`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.Units.mem`: Given a unit `u : (𝓞 K)ˣ`, we have that
`u ∈ {1, -1, η, -η, η^2, -η^2}`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent`: Given a unit
`u : (𝓞 K)ˣ`, if `u` is congruent to an integer modulo `3`, then `u = 1` or `u = -1`.
This is a special case of the so-called *Kummer's lemma* (see for example [washington_cyclotomic],
Theorem 5.36
-/
open NumberField Units InfinitePlace nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable {ζ : K} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(3 : ℕ+)) (u : (𝓞 K)ˣ)
local notation3 "η" => (IsPrimitiveRoot.isUnit (hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot) (by decide)).unit
local notation3 "λ" => hζ.toInteger - 1
lemma coe_eta : (η : 𝓞 K) = hζ.toInteger := rfl
lemma _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.toInteger_cube_eq_one : hζ.toInteger ^ 3 = 1 :=
hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot.pow_eq_one
/-- Let `u` be a unit in `(𝓞 K)ˣ`, then `u ∈ [1, -1, η, -η, η^2, -η^2]`. -/
-- Here `List` is more convenient than `Finset`, even if further from the informal statement.
-- For example, `fin_cases` below does not work with a `Finset`.
theorem Units.mem [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] :
u ∈ [1, -1, η, -η, η ^ 2, -η ^ 2] := by
have hrank : rank K = 0 := by
dsimp only [rank]
rw [card_eq_nrRealPlaces_add_nrComplexPlaces, nrRealPlaces_eq_zero (n := 3) K (by decide),
zero_add, nrComplexPlaces_eq_totient_div_two (n := 3)]
rfl
obtain ⟨⟨x, e⟩, hxu, -⟩ := exist_unique_eq_mul_prod _ u
replace hxu : u = x := by
rw [← mul_one x.1, hxu]
apply congr_arg
rw [← Finset.prod_empty]
congr
rw [Finset.univ_eq_empty_iff, hrank]
infer_instance
obtain ⟨n, hnpos, hn⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.1 <| (CommGroup.mem_torsion _ _).1 x.2
replace hn : (↑u : K) ^ ((⟨n, hnpos⟩ : ℕ+) : ℕ) = 1 := by
rw [← map_pow]
convert map_one (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)
rw_mod_cast [hxu, hn]
simp
obtain ⟨r, hr3, hru⟩ := hζ.exists_pow_or_neg_mul_pow_of_isOfFinOrder (by decide)
(isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n, hnpos, hn⟩)
replace hr : r ∈ Finset.Ico 0 3 := Finset.mem_Ico.2 ⟨by simp, hr3⟩
replace hru : ↑u = η ^ r ∨ ↑u = -η ^ r := by
rcases hru with h | h
· left; ext; exact h
· right; ext; exact h
fin_cases hr <;> rcases hru with h | h <;> simp [h]
/-- We have that `λ ^ 2 = -3 * η`. -/
private lemma lambda_sq : λ ^ 2 = -3 * η := by
ext
calc (λ ^ 2 : K) = η ^ 2 + η + 1 - 3 * η := by
simp only [RingOfIntegers.map_mk, IsUnit.unit_spec]; ring
_ = 0 - 3 * η := by simpa using hζ.isRoot_cyclotomic (by decide)
_ = -3 * η := by ring
/-- We have that `η ^ 2 = -η - 1`. -/
lemma eta_sq : (η ^ 2 : 𝓞 K) = - η - 1 := by
rw [← neg_add', ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← add_assoc]
ext; simpa using hζ.isRoot_cyclotomic (by decide)
/-- If a unit `u` is congruent to an integer modulo `λ ^ 2`, then `u = 1` or `u = -1`.
| This is a special case of the so-called *Kummer's lemma*. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent
[NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] (hcong : ∃ n : ℤ, λ ^ 2 ∣ (u - n : 𝓞 K)) :
u = 1 ∨ u = -1 := by
replace hcong : ∃ n : ℤ, (3 : 𝓞 K) ∣ (↑u - n : 𝓞 K) := by
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
exact ⟨n, -η * x, by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← lambda_sq, hx]⟩
have hζ := IsCyclotomicExtension.zeta_spec 3 ℚ K
have := Units.mem hζ u
fin_cases this
· left; rfl
· right; rfl
all_goals exfalso
· exact hζ.not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide) hcong
· apply hζ.not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx
refine ⟨-n, -x, sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 ?_⟩
simp only [PNat.val_ofNat, Nat.cast_ofNat, mul_neg, Int.cast_neg, ← neg_add, ← hx,
Units.val_neg, IsUnit.unit_spec, RingOfIntegers.neg_mk, neg_neg]
· exact (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two'
(by decide) hcong
· apply (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two'
(by decide)
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
refine ⟨-n, -x, sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 ?_⟩
have : (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).toInteger = hζ.toInteger ^ 2 := by ext; simp
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Three.lean | 92 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Thomas Browning, Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.FixedPoints
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Subgroups generated by transpositions
This file studies subgroups generated by transpositions.
## Main results
- `swap_mem_closure_isSwap` : If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a transposition
`swap x y` lies in the subgroup if and only if `x` lies in the same orbit as `y`.
- `mem_closure_isSwap` : If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a permutation `f`
lies in the subgroup if and only if `f` has finite support and `f x` always lies in the same
orbit as `x`.
-/
open Equiv List MulAction Pointwise Set Subgroup
variable {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
/-- If the support of each element in a generating set of a permutation group is finite,
then the support of every element in the group is finite. -/
theorem finite_compl_fixedBy_closure_iff {S : Set G} :
(∀ g ∈ closure S, (fixedBy α g)ᶜ.Finite) ↔ ∀ g ∈ S, (fixedBy α g)ᶜ.Finite :=
⟨fun h g hg ↦ h g (subset_closure hg), fun h g hg ↦ by
refine closure_induction h (by simp) (fun g g' _ _ hg hg' ↦ (hg.union hg').subset ?_)
(by simp) hg
simp_rw [← compl_inter, compl_subset_compl, fixedBy_mul]⟩
/-- Given a symmetric generating set of a permutation group, if T is a nonempty proper subset of
an orbit, then there exists a generator that sends some element of T into the complement of T. -/
theorem exists_smul_not_mem_of_subset_orbit_closure (S : Set G) (T : Set α) {a : α}
(hS : ∀ g ∈ S, g⁻¹ ∈ S) (subset : T ⊆ orbit (closure S) a) (not_mem : a ∉ T)
(nonempty : T.Nonempty) : ∃ σ ∈ S, ∃ a ∈ T, σ • a ∉ T := by
have key0 : ¬ closure S ≤ stabilizer G T := by
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := nonempty
obtain ⟨σ, rfl⟩ := subset hb
contrapose! not_mem with h
exact smul_mem_smul_set_iff.mp ((h σ.2).symm ▸ hb)
contrapose! key0
refine (closure_le _).mpr fun σ hσ ↦ ?_
simp_rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_stabilizer_iff, Set.ext_iff, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
exact fun a ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ smul_inv_smul σ a ▸ key0 σ hσ (σ⁻¹ • a) h, key0 σ⁻¹ (hS σ hσ) a⟩
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem finite_compl_fixedBy_swap {x y : α} : (fixedBy α (swap x y))ᶜ.Finite :=
Set.Finite.subset (s := {x, y}) (by simp)
(compl_subset_comm.mp fun z h ↦ by apply swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne <;> rintro rfl <;> simp at h)
theorem Equiv.Perm.IsSwap.finite_compl_fixedBy {σ : Perm α} (h : σ.IsSwap) :
(fixedBy α σ)ᶜ.Finite := by
obtain ⟨x, y, -, rfl⟩ := h
exact finite_compl_fixedBy_swap
-- this result cannot be moved to Perm/Basic since Perm/Basic is not allowed to import Submonoid
theorem SubmonoidClass.swap_mem_trans {a b c : α} {C} [SetLike C (Perm α)]
[SubmonoidClass C (Perm α)] (M : C) (hab : swap a b ∈ M) (hbc : swap b c ∈ M) :
swap a c ∈ M := by
obtain rfl | hab' := eq_or_ne a b
· exact hbc
obtain rfl | hac := eq_or_ne a c
· exact swap_self a ▸ one_mem M
rw [swap_comm, ← swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hab' hac]
exact mul_mem (mul_mem hbc hab) hbc
/-- If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a transposition `swap x y` lies in the
subgroup if and only if `x` lies in the same orbit as `y`. -/
theorem swap_mem_closure_isSwap {S : Set (Perm α)} (hS : ∀ f ∈ S, f.IsSwap) {x y : α} :
swap x y ∈ closure S ↔ x ∈ orbit (closure S) y := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨swap x y, h⟩, swap_apply_right x y⟩, fun hf ↦ ?_⟩
by_contra h
have := exists_smul_not_mem_of_subset_orbit_closure S {x | swap x y ∈ closure S}
(fun f hf ↦ ?_) (fun z hz ↦ ?_) h ⟨y, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨σ, hσ, a, ha, hσa⟩ := this
obtain ⟨z, w, hzw, rfl⟩ := hS σ hσ
have := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ha hσa
rw [Perm.smul_def, ne_comm, swap_apply_ne_self_iff, and_iff_right hzw] at this
refine hσa (SubmonoidClass.swap_mem_trans (closure S) ?_ ha)
obtain rfl | rfl := this <;> simpa [swap_comm] using subset_closure hσ
· obtain ⟨x, y, -, rfl⟩ := hS f hf; rwa [swap_inv]
· exact orbit_eq_iff.mpr hf ▸ ⟨⟨swap z y, hz⟩, swap_apply_right z y⟩
· rw [mem_setOf, swap_self]; apply one_mem
/-- If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a permutation `f` lies in the subgroup if
and only if `f` has finite support and `f x` always lies in the same orbit as `x`. -/
theorem mem_closure_isSwap {S : Set (Perm α)} (hS : ∀ f ∈ S, f.IsSwap) {f : Perm α} :
f ∈ closure S ↔ (fixedBy α f)ᶜ.Finite ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ orbit (closure S) x := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨?_, fun x ↦ mem_orbit_iff.mpr ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩⟩, ?_⟩
· exact finite_compl_fixedBy_closure_iff.mpr (fun f hf ↦ (hS f hf).finite_compl_fixedBy) _ hf
rintro ⟨fin, hf⟩
set supp := (fixedBy α f)ᶜ with supp_eq
suffices h : (fixedBy α f)ᶜ ⊆ supp → f ∈ closure S from h supp_eq.symm.subset
clear_value supp; clear supp_eq; revert f
apply fin.induction_on ..
· rintro f - emp; convert (closure S).one_mem; ext; by_contra h; exact emp h
rintro a s - - ih f hf supp_subset
refine (mul_mem_cancel_left ((swap_mem_closure_isSwap hS).2 (hf a))).1
(ih (fun b ↦ ?_) fun b hb ↦ ?_)
· rw [Perm.mul_apply, swap_apply_def]; split_ifs with h1 h2
· rw [← orbit_eq_iff.mpr (hf b), h1, orbit_eq_iff.mpr (hf a)]; apply mem_orbit_self
· rw [← orbit_eq_iff.mpr (hf b), h2]; apply hf
· exact hf b
· contrapose! hb
simp_rw [not_mem_compl_iff, mem_fixedBy, Perm.smul_def, Perm.mul_apply, swap_apply_def,
apply_eq_iff_eq]
by_cases hb' : f b = b
· rw [hb']; split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h]
simp [show b = a by simpa [hb] using supp_subset hb']
/-- A permutation is a product of transpositions if and only if it has finite support. -/
theorem mem_closure_isSwap' {f : Perm α} :
f ∈ closure {σ : Perm α | σ.IsSwap} ↔ (fixedBy α f)ᶜ.Finite := by
refine (mem_closure_isSwap fun _ ↦ id).trans
(and_iff_left fun x ↦ ⟨⟨swap x (f x), ?_⟩, swap_apply_left x (f x)⟩)
by_cases h : x = f x
| · rw [← h, swap_self]
apply Subgroup.one_mem
· exact subset_closure ⟨x, f x, h, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/ClosureSwap.lean | 127 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
dsimp only [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem
unfold erase
revert h_mem; cases cmpLE x t_x <;> intro h_mem <;> dsimp only at h_mem ⊢
· have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_l_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.left
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_l_h
rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz
(Or.inl (Exists.intro t_l.size (And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_l, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_l_size := pos_size_of_mem h.left.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_l_size; rcases t_l.size with - | t_l_size <;> intro h_pos_t_l_size
· cases h_pos_t_l_size
· simp [Nat.add_right_comm]
· rw [(Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1).2, h.sz.1]; rfl
· have t_ih_r := t_ih_r' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_r_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.right
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_r_h
rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz
(Or.inr (Exists.intro t_r.size (And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_r, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_r_size := pos_size_of_mem h.right.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_r_size; rcases t_r.size with - | t_r_size <;> intro h_pos_t_r_size
· cases h_pos_t_r_size
· simp [Nat.add_assoc]
end Valid
end Ordnode
/-- An `Ordset α` is a finite set of values, represented as a tree. The operations on this type
maintain that the tree is balanced and correctly stores subtree sizes at each level. The
correctness property of the tree is baked into the type, so all operations on this type are correct
by construction. -/
def Ordset (α : Type*) [Preorder α] :=
{ t : Ordnode α // t.Valid }
namespace Ordset
open Ordnode
variable [Preorder α]
/-- O(1). The empty set. -/
nonrec def nil : Ordset α :=
⟨nil, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
/-- O(1). Get the size of the set. -/
def size (s : Ordset α) : ℕ :=
s.1.size
/-- O(1). Construct a singleton set containing value `a`. -/
protected def singleton (a : α) : Ordset α :=
⟨singleton a, valid_singleton⟩
instance instEmptyCollection : EmptyCollection (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instSingleton : Singleton α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.singleton⟩
/-- O(1). Is the set empty? -/
def Empty (s : Ordset α) : Prop :=
s = ∅
theorem empty_iff {s : Ordset α} : s = ∅ ↔ s.1.empty :=
⟨fun h => by cases h; exact rfl,
fun h => by cases s with | mk s_val _ => cases s_val <;> [rfl; cases h]⟩
instance Empty.instDecidablePred : DecidablePred (@Empty α _) :=
fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ empty_iff
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, this replaces it. -/
protected def insert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.insert x s.1, insert.valid _ s.2⟩
instance instInsert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] : Insert α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.insert⟩
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, the set is returned as is. -/
nonrec def insert' [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨insert' x s.1, insert'.valid _ s.2⟩
section
variable [DecidableLE α]
/-- O(log n). Does the set contain the element `x`? That is,
is there an element that is equivalent to `x` in the order? -/
def mem (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Bool :=
x ∈ s.val
/-- O(log n). Retrieve an element in the set that is equivalent to `x` in the order,
if it exists. -/
def find (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Option α :=
Ordnode.find x s.val
instance instMembership : Membership α (Ordset α) :=
⟨fun s x => mem x s⟩
instance mem.decidable (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
instDecidableEqBool _ _
theorem pos_size_of_mem {x : α} {t : Ordset α} (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by
simp? [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem says
simp only [Membership.mem, mem, Bool.decide_eq_true] at h_mem
apply Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem t.property.sz h_mem
end
/-- O(log n). Remove an element from the set equivalent to `x`. Does nothing if there
is no such element. -/
def erase [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.erase x s.val, Ordnode.erase.valid x s.property⟩
/-- O(n). Map a function across a tree, without changing the structure. -/
def map {β} [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset β :=
⟨Ordnode.map f s.val, Ordnode.map.valid f_strict_mono s.property⟩
end Ordset
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,154 | 1,155 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 1,017 | 1,021 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases x with
| top => exact (h'x rfl).elim
| coe x =>
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
induction x using recTopCoe
· rcases hy.eq_or_lt with rfl|hy
· rw [rpow_zero, one_mul, zero_add]
rcases hz.eq_or_lt with rfl|hz
· rw [rpow_zero, mul_one, add_zero]
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, hy, hz, add_pos hy hz]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hy, hz, add_nonneg hy hz, NNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg _ hy hz]
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
|
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 601 | 604 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series in one variable - Truncation
`PowerSeries.trunc n φ` truncates a (univariate) formal power series
to the polynomial that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m < n`,
and `0` otherwise.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Trunc
variable [Semiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : R[X] :=
∑ m ∈ Ico 0 n, Polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
theorem coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m < n then coeff R m φ else 0 := by
simp [trunc, Polynomial.coeff_sum, Polynomial.coeff_monomial, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, LinearMap.map_zero, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_one (n) : trunc (n + 1) (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one, Polynomial.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h _ h'
· rfl
· rfl
· subst h'; simp at h
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc (n + 1) (C R a) = Polynomial.C a :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, Polynomial.coeff_C]
split_ifs with H <;> first |rfl|try simp_all
@[simp]
theorem trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
simp only [coeff_trunc, AddMonoidHom.map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add]
split_ifs with H
· rfl
· rw [zero_add]
theorem trunc_succ (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n.succ f = trunc n f + Polynomial.monomial n (coeff R n f) := by
rw [trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range, sum_range_succ, trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range]
theorem natDegree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc (n + 1) f).natDegree < n + 1 := by
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [lt_succ, ← not_lt] at h
contradiction
· rfl
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero' {f : R⟦X⟧} : trunc 0 f = 0 := rfl
theorem degree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc n f).degree < n := by
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [← not_le] at h
contradiction
· rfl
theorem eval₂_trunc_eq_sum_range {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (s : S) (G : R →+* S) (n) (f : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n f).eval₂ G s = ∑ i ∈ range n, G (coeff R i f) * s ^ i := by
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [trunc_zero', range_zero, sum_empty, eval₂_zero]
| succ n =>
have := natDegree_trunc_lt f n
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range' (hn := this)]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro _ h
rw [mem_range] at h
congr
rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem trunc_X (n) : trunc (n + 2) X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [h₂, coeff_X_one]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one h₂]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one]
intro hd
apply h₁
rw [hd]
exact n.one_lt_succ_succ
lemma trunc_X_of {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : trunc n X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n =>
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact trunc_X n
@[simp]
lemma trunc_one_left (p : R⟦X⟧) : trunc (R := R) 1 p = .C (coeff R 0 p) := by
ext i; simp +contextual [coeff_trunc, Polynomial.coeff_C]
lemma trunc_one_X : trunc (R := R) 1 X = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
lemma trunc_C_mul (n : ℕ) (r : R) (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (C R r * f) = .C r * trunc n f := by
ext i; simp [coeff_trunc]
@[simp]
lemma trunc_mul_C (n : ℕ) (f : R⟦X⟧) (r : R) : trunc n (f * C R r) = trunc n f * .C r := by
ext i; simp [coeff_trunc]
end Trunc
section Trunc
/-
Lemmas in this section involve the coercion `R[X] → R⟦X⟧`, so they may only be stated in the case
`R` is commutative. This is because the coercion is an `R`-algebra map.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
open Nat hiding pow_succ pow_zero
open Polynomial Finset Finset.Nat
theorem trunc_trunc_of_le {n m} (f : R⟦X⟧) (hnm : n ≤ m := by rfl) :
trunc n ↑(trunc m f) = trunc n f := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc, coeff_coe]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos <| lt_of_lt_of_le h hnm]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc {n} (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n ↑(trunc n f) = trunc n f :=
trunc_trunc_of_le f
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_mul {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n ((trunc n f) * g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
ext m
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_mul, coeff_mul, sum_congr rfl]
intro _ hab
have ha := lt_of_le_of_lt (antidiagonal.fst_le hab) h
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc, if_pos ha]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (f * (trunc n g) : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
rw [mul_comm, trunc_trunc_mul, mul_comm]
theorem trunc_trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (trunc n f * trunc n g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
rw [trunc_trunc_mul, trunc_mul_trunc]
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_pow (f : R⟦X⟧) (n a : ℕ) :
trunc n ((trunc n f : R⟦X⟧) ^ a) = trunc n (f ^ a) := by
induction a with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ a ih =>
rw [_root_.pow_succ', _root_.pow_succ', trunc_trunc_mul,
← trunc_trunc_mul_trunc, ih, trunc_trunc_mul_trunc]
theorem trunc_coe_eq_self {n} {f : R[X]} (hn : natDegree f < n) : trunc n (f : R⟦X⟧) = f := by
rw [← Polynomial.coe_inj]
ext m
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc]
split
case isTrue h => rfl
case isFalse h =>
rw [not_lt] at h
rw [coeff_coe]; symm
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le hn h
/-- The function `coeff n : R⟦X⟧ → R` is continuous. I.e. `coeff n f` depends only on a sufficiently
long truncation of the power series `f`. -/
theorem coeff_coe_trunc_of_lt {n m} {f : R⟦X⟧} (h : n < m) :
coeff R n (trunc m f) = coeff R n f := by
| rwa [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc, if_pos]
/-- The `n`-th coefficient of `f*g` may be calculated
from the truncations of `f` and `g`. -/
theorem coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc₂ {n a b} (f g) (ha : n < a) (hb : n < b) :
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Trunc.lean | 212 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
/-!
# Compositions
A composition of a natural number `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum
of positive integers. Combinatorially, it corresponds to a decomposition of `{0, ..., n-1}` into
non-empty blocks of consecutive integers, where the `iⱼ` are the lengths of the blocks.
This notion is closely related to that of a partition of `n`, but in a composition of `n` the
order of the `iⱼ`s matters.
We implement two different structures covering these two viewpoints on compositions. The first
one, made of a list of positive integers summing to `n`, is the main one and is called
`Composition n`. The second one is useful for combinatorial arguments (for instance to show that
the number of compositions of `n` is `2^(n-1)`). It is given by a subset of `{0, ..., n}`
containing `0` and `n`, where the elements of the subset (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost
points of each block. The main API is built on `Composition n`, and we provide an equivalence
between the two types.
## Main functions
* `c : Composition n` is a structure, made of a list of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
* `composition_card` states that the cardinality of `Composition n` is exactly
`2^(n-1)`, which is proved by constructing an equiv with `CompositionAsSet n` (see below), which
is itself in bijection with the subsets of `Fin (n-1)` (this holds even for `n = 0`, where `-` is
nat subtraction).
Let `c : Composition n` be a composition of `n`. Then
* `c.blocks` is the list of blocks in `c`.
* `c.length` is the number of blocks in the composition.
* `c.blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ` is the realization of `c.blocks` as a function on
`Fin c.length`. This is the main object when using compositions to understand the composition of
analytic functions.
* `c.sizeUpTo : ℕ → ℕ` is the sum of the size of the blocks up to `i`.;
* `c.embedding i : Fin (c.blocksFun i) → Fin n` is the increasing embedding of the `i`-th block in
`Fin n`;
* `c.index j`, for `j : Fin n`, is the index of the block containing `j`.
* `Composition.ones n` is the composition of `n` made of ones, i.e., `[1, ..., 1]`.
* `Composition.single n (hn : 0 < n)` is the composition of `n` made of a single block of size `n`.
Compositions can also be used to split lists. Let `l` be a list of length `n` and `c` a composition
of `n`.
* `l.splitWrtComposition c` is a list of lists, made of the slices of `l` corresponding to the
blocks of `c`.
* `join_splitWrtComposition` states that splitting a list and then joining it gives back the
original list.
* `splitWrtComposition_join` states that joining a list of lists, and then splitting it back
according to the right composition, gives back the original list of lists.
We turn to the second viewpoint on compositions, that we realize as a finset of `Fin (n+1)`.
`c : CompositionAsSet n` is a structure made of a finset of `Fin (n+1)` called `c.boundaries`
and proofs that it contains `0` and `n`. (Taking a finset of `Fin n` containing `0` would not
make sense in the edge case `n = 0`, while the previous description works in all cases).
The elements of this set (other than `n`) correspond to leftmost points of blocks.
Thus, there is an equiv between `Composition n` and `CompositionAsSet n`. We
only construct basic API on `CompositionAsSet` (notably `c.length` and `c.blocks`) to be able
to construct this equiv, called `compositionEquiv n`. Since there is a straightforward equiv
between `CompositionAsSet n` and finsets of `{1, ..., n-1}` (obtained by removing `0` and `n`
from a `CompositionAsSet` and called `compositionAsSetEquiv n`), we deduce that
`CompositionAsSet n` and `Composition n` are both fintypes of cardinality `2^(n - 1)`
(see `compositionAsSet_card` and `composition_card`).
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is in the construction of the composition of
formal multilinear series, and the proof that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The representation of a composition as a list is very handy as lists are very flexible and already
have a well-developed API.
## Tags
Composition, partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(combinatorics)>
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- A composition of `n` is a list of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
/-- List of positive integers summing to `n` -/
blocks : List ℕ
/-- Proof of positivity for `blocks` -/
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
/-- Proof that `blocks` sums to `n` -/
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
deriving DecidableEq
attribute [simp] Composition.blocks_sum
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n`, by seeing it as non-empty blocks of
consecutive integers in `{0, ..., n-1}`. We register every block by its left end-point, yielding
a finset containing `0`. As this does not make sense for `n = 0`, we add `n` to this finset, and
get a finset of `{0, ..., n}` containing `0` and `n`. This is the data in the structure
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n` as consecutive integers `{0, ..., n-1}` -/
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
/-- Proof that `0` is a member of `boundaries` -/
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
/-- Last element of the composition -/
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
deriving DecidableEq
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
attribute [simp] CompositionAsSet.zero_mem CompositionAsSet.getLast_mem
/-!
### Compositions
A composition of an integer `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum of
positive integers.
-/
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
/-- The length of a composition, i.e., the number of blocks in the composition. -/
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
/-- The blocks of a composition, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. When composing analytic
functions using compositions, this is the main player. -/
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
@[simp]
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 160 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
cases s₂
simp [AList.toFinmap]
@[simp]
theorem AList.toFinmap_entries (s : AList β) : ⟦s⟧.entries = s.entries :=
rfl
/-- Given `l : List (Sigma β)`, create a term of type `Finmap β` by removing
entries with duplicate keys. -/
def List.toFinmap [DecidableEq α] (s : List (Sigma β)) : Finmap β :=
s.toAList.toFinmap
namespace Finmap
open AList
lemma nodup_entries (f : Finmap β) : f.entries.Nodup := f.nodupKeys.nodup
/-! ### Lifting from AList -/
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def liftOn {γ} (s : Finmap β) (f : AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a b : AList β, a.entries ~ b.entries → f a = f b) : γ := by
refine
(Quotient.liftOn s.entries
(fun (l : List (Sigma β)) => (⟨_, fun nd => f ⟨l, nd⟩⟩ : Part γ))
(fun l₁ l₂ p => Part.ext' (perm_nodupKeys p) ?_) : Part γ).get ?_
· exact fun h1 h2 => H _ _ p
· have := s.nodupKeys
revert this
rcases s.entries with ⟨l⟩
exact id
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_toFinmap {γ} (s : AList β) (f : AList β → γ) (H) : liftOn ⟦s⟧ f H = f s := by
cases s
rfl
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on 2 `AList`s to 2 `Finmap`s. -/
def liftOn₂ {γ} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : AList β,
a₁.entries ~ a₂.entries → b₁.entries ~ b₂.entries → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : γ :=
liftOn s₁ (fun l₁ => liftOn s₂ (f l₁) fun _ _ p => H _ _ _ _ (Perm.refl _) p) fun a₁ a₂ p => by
have H' : f a₁ = f a₂ := funext fun _ => H _ _ _ _ p (Perm.refl _)
simp only [H']
@[simp]
theorem liftOn₂_toFinmap {γ} (s₁ s₂ : AList β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ) (H) :
liftOn₂ ⟦s₁⟧ ⟦s₂⟧ f H = f s₁ s₂ := by
cases s₁; cases s₂; rfl
/-! ### Induction -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : Finmap β → Prop} (s : Finmap β) (H : ∀ a : AList β, C ⟦a⟧) : C s := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩; exact H ⟨a, h⟩
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧) : C s₁ s₂ :=
induction_on s₁ fun l₁ => induction_on s₂ fun l₂ => H l₁ l₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₃ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ a₃ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧ ⟦a₃⟧) : C s₁ s₂ s₃ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => induction_on s₃ fun l₃ => H l₁ l₂ l₃
/-! ### extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {s t : Finmap β}, s.entries = t.entries → s = t
| ⟨l₁, h₁⟩, ⟨l₂, _⟩, H => by congr
@[simp]
theorem ext_iff' {s t : Finmap β} : s.entries = t.entries ↔ s = t :=
Finmap.ext_iff.symm
/-! ### mem -/
/-- The predicate `a ∈ s` means that `s` has a value associated to the key `a`. -/
instance : Membership α (Finmap β) :=
⟨fun s a => a ∈ s.entries.keys⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.entries.keys :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinmap {a : α} {s : AList β} : a ∈ toFinmap s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-! ### keys -/
/-- The set of keys of a finite map. -/
def keys (s : Finmap β) : Finset α :=
⟨s.entries.keys, s.nodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩
@[simp]
theorem keys_val (s : AList β) : (keys ⟦s⟧).val = s.keys :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_ext {s₁ s₂ : AList β} : keys ⟦s₁⟧ = keys ⟦s₂⟧ ↔ s₁.keys ~ s₂.keys := by
simp [keys, AList.keys]
theorem mem_keys {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s.keys ↔ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.mem_keys
/-! ### empty -/
/-- The empty map. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Finmap β) :=
⟨⟨0, nodupKeys_nil⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (Finmap β) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_toFinmap : (⟦∅⟧ : Finmap β) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinmap_nil [DecidableEq α] : ([].toFinmap : Finmap β) = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem not_mem_empty {a : α} : a ∉ (∅ : Finmap β) :=
Multiset.not_mem_zero a
@[simp]
theorem keys_empty : (∅ : Finmap β).keys = ∅ :=
rfl
/-! ### singleton -/
/-- The singleton map. -/
def singleton (a : α) (b : β a) : Finmap β :=
⟦AList.singleton a b⟧
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton (a : α) (b : β a) : (singleton a b).keys = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton (x y : α) (b : β y) : x ∈ singleton y b ↔ x = y := by
simp [singleton, mem_def]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
instance decidableEq [∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] : DecidableEq (Finmap β)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ Finmap.ext_iff.symm
/-! ### lookup -/
/-- Look up the value associated to a key in a map. -/
def lookup (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Option (β a) :=
liftOn s (AList.lookup a) fun _ _ => perm_lookup
@[simp]
theorem lookup_toFinmap (a : α) (s : AList β) : lookup a ⟦s⟧ = s.lookup a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_list_toFinmap (a : α) (s : List (Sigma β)) : lookup a s.toFinmap = s.dlookup a := by
rw [List.toFinmap, lookup_toFinmap, lookup_to_alist]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_empty (a) : lookup a (∅ : Finmap β) = none :=
rfl
theorem lookup_isSome {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : (s.lookup a).isSome ↔ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_isSome
theorem lookup_eq_none {a} {s : Finmap β} : lookup a s = none ↔ a ∉ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_eq_none
lemma mem_lookup_iff {s : Finmap β} {a : α} {b : β a} :
b ∈ s.lookup a ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ s.entries := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩; exact List.mem_dlookup_iff hl
lemma lookup_eq_some_iff {s : Finmap β} {a : α} {b : β a} :
s.lookup a = b ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ s.entries := mem_lookup_iff
@[simp] lemma sigma_keys_lookup (s : Finmap β) :
s.keys.sigma (fun i => (s.lookup i).toFinset) = ⟨s.entries, s.nodup_entries⟩ := by
ext x
have : x ∈ s.entries → x.1 ∈ s.keys := Multiset.mem_map_of_mem _
simpa [lookup_eq_some_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_singleton_eq {a : α} {b : β a} : (singleton a b).lookup a = some b := by
rw [singleton, lookup_toFinmap, AList.singleton, AList.lookup, dlookup_cons_eq]
instance (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ lookup_isSome
theorem mem_iff {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ b, s.lookup a = some b :=
induction_on s fun s =>
Iff.trans List.mem_keys <| exists_congr fun _ => (mem_dlookup_iff s.nodupKeys).symm
theorem mem_of_lookup_eq_some {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} (h : s.lookup a = some b) : a ∈ s :=
mem_iff.mpr ⟨_, h⟩
theorem ext_lookup {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : (∀ x, s₁.lookup x = s₂.lookup x) → s₁ = s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun s₁ s₂ h => by
simp only [AList.lookup, lookup_toFinmap] at h
rw [AList.toFinmap_eq]
apply lookup_ext s₁.nodupKeys s₂.nodupKeys
intro x y
rw [h]
/-- An equivalence between `Finmap β` and pairs `(keys : Finset α, lookup : ∀ a, Option (β a))` such
that `(lookup a).isSome ↔ a ∈ keys`. -/
@[simps apply_coe_fst apply_coe_snd]
def keysLookupEquiv :
Finmap β ≃ { f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1 } where
toFun s := ⟨(s.keys, fun i => s.lookup i), fun _ => lookup_isSome⟩
invFun f := mk (f.1.1.sigma fun i => (f.1.2 i).toFinset).val <| by
refine Multiset.nodup_keys.1 ((Finset.nodup _).map_on ?_)
simp only [Finset.mem_val, Finset.mem_sigma, Option.mem_toFinset, Option.mem_def]
rintro ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ (rfl : i = j)
simpa using hx.symm.trans hy
left_inv f := ext <| by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨(s, f), hf⟩ => by
dsimp only at hf
ext
· simp [keys, Multiset.keys, ← hf, Option.isSome_iff_exists]
· simp +contextual [lookup_eq_some_iff, ← hf]
@[simp] lemma keysLookupEquiv_symm_apply_keys :
∀ f : {f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1},
(keysLookupEquiv.symm f).keys = f.1.1 :=
keysLookupEquiv.surjective.forall.2 fun _ => by
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply, keysLookupEquiv_apply_coe_fst]
@[simp] lemma keysLookupEquiv_symm_apply_lookup :
∀ (f : {f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1}) a,
(keysLookupEquiv.symm f).lookup a = f.1.2 a :=
keysLookupEquiv.surjective.forall.2 fun _ _ => by
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply, keysLookupEquiv_apply_coe_snd]
/-! ### replace -/
/-- Replace a key with a given value in a finite map.
If the key is not present it does nothing. -/
def replace (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.replace a b t))
fun _ _ p => toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_replace p
@[simp]
theorem replace_toFinmap (a : α) (b : β a) (s : AList β) :
replace a b ⟦s⟧ = (⟦s.replace a b⟧ : Finmap β) := by
simp [replace]
@[simp]
theorem keys_replace (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : (replace a b s).keys = s.keys :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_replace {a a' : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} : a' ∈ replace a b s ↔ a' ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
end
/-! ### foldl -/
/-- Fold a commutative function over the key-value pairs in the map -/
def foldl {δ : Type w} (f : δ → ∀ a, β a → δ)
(H : ∀ d a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, f (f d a₁ b₁) a₂ b₂ = f (f d a₂ b₂) a₁ b₁) (d : δ) (m : Finmap β) : δ :=
letI : RightCommutative fun d (s : Sigma β) ↦ f d s.1 s.2 := ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ H _ _ _ _ _⟩
m.entries.foldl (fun d s => f d s.1 s.2) d
/-- `any f s` returns `true` iff there exists a value `v` in `s` such that `f v = true`. -/
def any (f : ∀ x, β x → Bool) (s : Finmap β) : Bool :=
s.foldl (fun x y z => x || f y z)
(fun _ _ _ _ => by simp_rw [Bool.or_assoc, Bool.or_comm, imp_true_iff]) false
/-- `all f s` returns `true` iff `f v = true` for all values `v` in `s`. -/
def all (f : ∀ x, β x → Bool) (s : Finmap β) : Bool :=
s.foldl (fun x y z => x && f y z)
(fun _ _ _ _ => by simp_rw [Bool.and_assoc, Bool.and_comm, imp_true_iff]) true
/-! ### erase -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Erase a key from the map. If the key is not present it does nothing. -/
def erase (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.erase a t)) fun _ _ p => toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_erase p
@[simp]
theorem erase_toFinmap (a : α) (s : AList β) : erase a ⟦s⟧ = AList.toFinmap (s.erase a) := by
simp [erase]
@[simp]
theorem keys_erase_toFinset (a : α) (s : AList β) : keys ⟦s.erase a⟧ = (keys ⟦s⟧).erase a := by
simp [Finset.erase, keys, AList.erase, keys_kerase]
@[simp]
theorem keys_erase (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : (erase a s).keys = s.keys.erase a :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_erase {a a' : α} {s : Finmap β} : a' ∈ erase a s ↔ a' ≠ a ∧ a' ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
theorem not_mem_erase_self {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : ¬a ∈ erase a s := by
rw [mem_erase, not_and_or, not_not]
left
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookup_erase (a) (s : Finmap β) : lookup a (erase a s) = none :=
induction_on s <| AList.lookup_erase a
@[simp]
theorem lookup_erase_ne {a a'} {s : Finmap β} (h : a ≠ a') : lookup a (erase a' s) = lookup a s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_erase_ne h
theorem erase_erase {a a' : α} {s : Finmap β} : erase a (erase a' s) = erase a' (erase a s) :=
induction_on s fun s => ext (by simp only [AList.erase_erase, erase_toFinmap])
/-! ### sdiff -/
/-- `sdiff s s'` consists of all key-value pairs from `s` and `s'` where the keys are in `s` or
`s'` but not both. -/
def sdiff (s s' : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
s'.foldl (fun s x _ => s.erase x) (fun _ _ _ _ _ => erase_erase) s
instance : SDiff (Finmap β) :=
⟨sdiff⟩
/-! ### insert -/
/-- Insert a key-value pair into a finite map, replacing any existing pair with
the same key. -/
def insert (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.insert a b t)) fun _ _ p =>
toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_insert p
@[simp]
theorem insert_toFinmap (a : α) (b : β a) (s : AList β) :
insert a b (AList.toFinmap s) = AList.toFinmap (s.insert a b) := by
simp [insert]
theorem entries_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} :
a ∉ s → (insert a b s).entries = ⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s.entries :=
induction_on s fun s h => by
simp [AList.entries_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinmap.1 h), -entries_insert]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-14")] alias insert_entries_of_neg := entries_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert {a a' : α} {b' : β a'} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ insert a' b' s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s AList.mem_insert
| @[simp]
theorem lookup_insert {a} {b : β a} (s : Finmap β) : lookup a (insert a b s) = some b :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp only [insert_toFinmap, lookup_toFinmap, AList.lookup_insert]
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 438 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `CancelCommMonoidWithZero`s, including `IsDomain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `NormalizationMonoid`
* `GCDMonoid`
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid`
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD`
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM`
For the `NormalizedGCDMonoid` instances on `ℕ` and `ℤ`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat`.
## Implementation Notes
* `NormalizationMonoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `normUnit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `GCDMonoid` contains the definitions of `gcd` and `lcm` with the usual properties. They are
both determined up to a unit.
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid` extends `NormalizationMonoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always
normalized. This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains,
and monoids without zero.
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `gcd` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `lcm` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `normUnit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- `normUnit` assigns to each element of the monoid a unit of the monoid. -/
normUnit : α → αˣ
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps `0` to the identity. -/
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` respects multiplication of non-zero elements. -/
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps units to their inverses. -/
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_one : normUnit (1 : α) = 1 :=
normUnit_coe_units 1
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `normUnit` -/
def normalize : α →*₀ α where
toFun x := x * normUnit x
map_zero' := by
simp only [normUnit_zero]
exact mul_one (0 : α)
map_one' := by rw [normUnit_one, one_mul]; rfl
map_mul' x y :=
(by_cases fun hx : x = 0 => by rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun hx =>
(by_cases fun hy : y = 0 => by rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) fun hy => by
simp only [normUnit_mul hx hy, Units.val_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y]
theorem associated_normalize (x : α) : Associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem normalize_associated (x : α) : Associated (normalize x) x :=
(associated_normalize _).symm
theorem associated_normalize_iff {x y : α} : Associated x (normalize y) ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (normalize_associated y), fun h => h.trans (associated_normalize y)⟩
theorem normalize_associated_iff {x y : α} : Associated (normalize x) y ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => (associated_normalize _).trans h, fun h => (normalize_associated _).trans h⟩
theorem Associates.mk_normalize (x : α) : Associates.mk (normalize x) = Associates.mk x :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (normalize_associated _)
theorem normalize_apply (x : α) : normalize x = x * normUnit x :=
rfl
theorem normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 :=
normalize.map_zero
theorem normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 :=
normalize.map_one
theorem normalize_coe_units (u : αˣ) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx => (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 <| hx ▸ associated_normalize _, by
rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
theorem normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun hx => isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_mul_normUnit (a : α) : normUnit (a * normUnit a) = 1 := by
nontriviality α using Subsingleton.elim a 0
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [normUnit_zero, zero_mul, normUnit_zero]
· rw [normUnit_mul h (Units.ne_zero _), normUnit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
@[simp]
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
normalize a = normalize b := by
nontriviality α
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩
refine by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 => ?_
suffices a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ by
simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, normUnit_mul ha u.ne_zero, normUnit_coe_units]
calc
a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹ := (Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [mul_right_comm a]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩, fun ⟨hxy, hyx⟩ =>
normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α} (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b)
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
theorem Associated.eq_of_normalized
{a b : α} (h : Associated a b) (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) :
a = b :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq ha hb h.dvd h.dvd'
@[simp]
theorem dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.dvd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.mul_right_dvd
end NormalizationMonoid
namespace Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
/-- Maps an element of `Associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : Associates α → α :=
(Quotient.lift (normalize : α → α)) fun a _ ⟨_, hu⟩ =>
hu ▸ normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (Units.mul_right_dvd.2 <| dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem out_mk (a : α) : (Associates.mk a).out = normalize a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem out_one : (1 : Associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
theorem out_mul (a b : Associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ => by
simp only [Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
theorem dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ Associates.mk a ≤ b :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
theorem out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ Associates.mk a :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
@[simp]
theorem out_top : (⊤ : Associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
@[simp]
theorem normalize_out (a : Associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn a normalize_idem
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk a.out = a :=
Quotient.inductionOn a mk_normalize
theorem out_injective : Function.Injective (Associates.out : _ → α) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective mk_out
end Associates
/-- GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with `gcd` (greatest common divisor) and
`lcm` (least common multiple) operations, determined up to a unit. The type class focuses on `gcd`
and we derive the corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- The greatest common divisor between two elements. -/
gcd : α → α → α
/-- The least common multiple between two elements. -/
lcm : α → α → α
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the first element. -/
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the second element. -/
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
/-- Any common divisor of both elements is a divisor of the GCD. -/
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
/-- The product of two elements is `Associated` with the product of their GCD and LCM. -/
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
/-- `0` is left-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
/-- `0` is right-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
/-- Normalized GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
/-- The GCD is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
/-- The LCM is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
@[simp]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_left [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_right [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique.
See `Nat.dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd` for a constructive version on `ℕ`. -/
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at h0
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨0, n, dvd_refl 0, dvd_refl n, by simp⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m
refine ⟨gcd k m, a, gcd_dvd_right _ _, ?_, ha⟩
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← ha]
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd [GCDMonoid α] (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
obtain ⟨m', n', hm', hn', h⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k (m * n))
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h
rw [h]
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _
apply mul_dvd_mul
· have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm'
· have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn'
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} :
gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ gcd a b ^ k := by
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact
(gcd_zero_left' (0 ^ k : α)).dvd.trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_zero_left' (0 : α)).symm.dvd _)
· induction k with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]; exact (gcd_one_right' a).dvd
| succ k hk =>
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ']
trans gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k)
· exact gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k)
· exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd a b ^ k :=
calc
gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd b (a ^ k) := (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd
_ ∣ gcd b a ^ k := gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
_ ∣ gcd a b ^ k := pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd _
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂) (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
have h1 : IsUnit (gcd (d₁ ^ k) b) := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
trans gcd d₁ b ^ k
· exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
· apply IsUnit.dvd
apply IsUnit.pow
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
apply dvd_trans _ hab.dvd
apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b)
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b := by
use d₂ ^ k
rw [h, hc]
exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k
rw [mul_comm] at h2
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
apply (dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2).trans
rw [h1.mul_left_dvd]
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro hdk
rw [hdk] at h3
apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha
exact ⟨h4, h3⟩
theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, Associated (d ^ k) a := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· use 0
rw [Subsingleton.elim a (0 ^ k)]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· use 0
obtain rfl | hk := eq_or_ne k 0
· simp [ha] at h
· rw [ha, zero_pow hk]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· use 1
rw [one_pow]
apply (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr hab).symm.trans
rw [hb]
exact gcd_zero_right' a
obtain rfl | hk := k.eq_zero_or_pos
· use 1
rw [pow_zero] at h ⊢
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, one_mul]
have hc : c ∣ a * b := by
rw [h]
exact dvd_pow_self _ hk.ne'
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, hd₁, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc
use d₁
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁
rw [mul_comm] at h hc
rw [(gcd_comm' a b).isUnit_iff] at hab
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h
have h' : a' * b' = 1 := by
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp
rw [mul_one]
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp
rw [← h]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc _ b', ← mul_assoc b', mul_comm b']
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h'
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, ha']
theorem exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] [Subsingleton αˣ]
{a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b)) {k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, a = d ^ k :=
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow hab h
⟨d, (associated_iff_eq.mp hd).symm⟩
theorem gcd_greatest {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
GCDMonoid.gcd a b = normalize d :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
gcd_eq_normalize h (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb)
theorem gcd_greatest_associated {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
Associated d (GCDMonoid.gcd a b) :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
associated_of_dvd_dvd (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb) h
theorem isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
{x y x' y' : α} (ex : x = gcd x y * x') (ey : y = gcd x y * y') (h : gcd x y ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
refine Associated.of_mul_left ?_ (Associated.refl <| gcd x y) h
convert (gcd_mul_left' (gcd x y) x' y').symm using 1
rw [← ex, ← ey, mul_one]
theorem extract_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] (x y : α) :
∃ x' y', x = gcd x y * x' ∧ y = gcd x y * y' ∧ IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
by_cases h : gcd x y = 0
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := (gcd_eq_zero_iff x y).1 h
simp_rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
exact ⟨1, 1, by rw [h, zero_mul], by rw [h, zero_mul], gcd_one_left' 1⟩
obtain ⟨x', ex⟩ := gcd_dvd_left x y
obtain ⟨y', ey⟩ := gcd_dvd_right x y
exact ⟨x', y', ex, ey, isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd ex ey h⟩
theorem associated_gcd_left_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated x (gcd x y) ↔ x ∣ y :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd dvd_rfl hxy) (gcd_dvd_left x y)⟩
theorem associated_gcd_right_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated y (gcd x y) ↔ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd hxy dvd_rfl) (gcd_dvd_right x y)⟩
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
IsUnit (gcd x y) ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [hx.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left x y), not_iff_not, associated_gcd_left_iff]
theorem Irreducible.gcd_eq_one_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
gcd x y = 1 ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [← hx.isUnit_gcd_iff, ← normalize_eq_one, NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd]
section Neg
variable [HasDistribNeg α]
lemma gcd_neg' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd a (-b)) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd .rfl (.neg_left .rfl)
lemma gcd_neg [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b :=
gcd_neg'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
lemma neg_gcd' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd (-a) b) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd (.neg_left .rfl) .rfl
lemma neg_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b :=
neg_gcd'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
end Neg
end GCD
section LCM
theorem lcm_dvd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} : lcm a b ∣ c ↔ a ∣ c ∧ b ∣ c := by
by_cases h : a = 0 ∨ b = 0
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;>
simp +contextual only [iff_def, lcm_zero_left, lcm_zero_right,
zero_dvd_iff, dvd_zero, eq_self_iff_true, and_true, imp_true_iff]
· obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := not_or.1 h
have h : gcd a b ≠ 0 := fun H => h1 ((gcd_eq_zero_iff _ _).1 H).1
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h, (gcd_mul_lcm a b).dvd_iff_dvd_left, ←
(gcd_mul_right' c a b).dvd_iff_dvd_right, dvd_gcd_iff, mul_comm b c, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h1,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h2, and_comm]
theorem dvd_lcm_left [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : a ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).1
theorem dvd_lcm_right [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : b ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).2
theorem lcm_dvd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcb : c ∣ b) : lcm a c ∣ b :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨hab, hcb⟩
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h : lcm a b = 0 => by
have : Associated (a * b) 0 := (gcd_mul_lcm a b).symm.trans <| by rw [h, mul_zero]
rwa [← mul_eq_zero, ← associated_zero_iff_eq_zero])
(by rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [apply lcm_zero_left; apply lcm_zero_right])
@[simp]
theorem normalize_lcm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_lcm a b
theorem lcm_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = lcm b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
|
theorem lcm_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (lcm a b) (lcm b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 695 | 703 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.PairwiseIntersections
/-!
# The sheaf condition in terms of an equalizer of products
Here we set up the machinery for the "usual" definition of the sheaf condition,
e.g. as in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0072
in terms of an equalizer diagram where the two objects are
`∏ᶜ F.obj (U i)` and `∏ᶜ F.obj (U i) ⊓ (U j)`.
We show that this sheaf condition is equivalent to the "pairwise intersections" sheaf condition when
the presheaf is valued in a category with products, and thereby equivalent to the default sheaf
condition.
-/
universe v' v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopologicalSpace Opposite TopologicalSpace.Opens
namespace TopCat
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasProducts.{v'} C]
variable {X : TopCat.{v'}} (F : Presheaf C X) {ι : Type v'} (U : ι → Opens X)
namespace Presheaf
namespace SheafConditionEqualizerProducts
/-- The product of the sections of a presheaf over a family of open sets. -/
def piOpens : C :=
∏ᶜ fun i : ι => F.obj (op (U i))
/-- The product of the sections of a presheaf over the pairwise intersections of
a family of open sets.
-/
def piInters : C :=
∏ᶜ fun p : ι × ι => F.obj (op (U p.1 ⊓ U p.2))
/-- The morphism `Π F.obj (U i) ⟶ Π F.obj (U i) ⊓ (U j)` whose components
are given by the restriction maps from `U i` to `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
def leftRes : piOpens F U ⟶ piInters.{v'} F U :=
Pi.lift fun p : ι × ι => Pi.π _ p.1 ≫ F.map (infLELeft (U p.1) (U p.2)).op
/-- The morphism `Π F.obj (U i) ⟶ Π F.obj (U i) ⊓ (U j)` whose components
are given by the restriction maps from `U j` to `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
def rightRes : piOpens F U ⟶ piInters.{v'} F U :=
Pi.lift fun p : ι × ι => Pi.π _ p.2 ≫ F.map (infLERight (U p.1) (U p.2)).op
/-- The morphism `F.obj U ⟶ Π F.obj (U i)` whose components
are given by the restriction maps from `U j` to `U i ⊓ U j`.
-/
def res : F.obj (op (iSup U)) ⟶ piOpens.{v'} F U :=
Pi.lift fun i : ι => F.map (TopologicalSpace.Opens.leSupr U i).op
@[simp, elementwise]
theorem res_π (i : ι) : res F U ≫ limit.π _ ⟨i⟩ = F.map (Opens.leSupr U i).op := by
rw [res, limit.lift_π, Fan.mk_π_app]
@[elementwise]
theorem w : res F U ≫ leftRes F U = res F U ≫ rightRes F U := by
dsimp [res, leftRes, rightRes]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` can't see `limit.hom_ext` applies here:
refine limit.hom_ext (fun _ => ?_)
simp only [limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, Fan.mk_π_app, Category.assoc]
rw [← F.map_comp]
rw [← F.map_comp]
congr 1
|
/-- The equalizer diagram for the sheaf condition.
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafCondition/EqualizerProducts.lean | 80 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.Banach
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
/-!
# Non-linear maps close to affine maps
In this file we study a map `f` such that `‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖` on an open set
`s`, where `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` is a continuous linear map and `c` is suitably small. Maps of this type
behave like `f a + f' (x - a)` near each `a ∈ s`.
When `f'` is onto, we show that `f` is locally onto.
When `f'` is a continuous linear equiv, we show that `f` is a homeomorphism
between `s` and `f '' s`. More precisely, we define `ApproximatesLinearOn.toPartialHomeomorph` to
be a `PartialHomeomorph` with `toFun = f`, `source = s`, and `target = f '' s`.
between `s` and `f '' s`. More precisely, we define `ApproximatesLinearOn.toPartialHomeomorph` to
be a `PartialHomeomorph` with `toFun = f`, `source = s`, and `target = f '' s`.
Maps of this type naturally appear in the proof of the inverse function theorem (see next section),
and `ApproximatesLinearOn.toPartialHomeomorph` will imply that the locally inverse function
and `ApproximatesLinearOn.toPartialHomeomorph` will imply that the locally inverse function
exists.
We define this auxiliary notion to split the proof of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. This approach makes it possible
- to prove a lower estimate on the size of the domain of the inverse function;
- to reuse parts of the proofs in the case if a function is not strictly differentiable. E.g., for a
function `f : E × F → G` with estimates on `f x y₁ - f x y₂` but not on `f x₁ y - f x₂ y`.
## Notations
We introduce some `local notation` to make formulas shorter:
* by `N` we denote `‖f'⁻¹‖`;
* by `g` we denote the auxiliary contracting map `x ↦ x + f'.symm (y - f x)` used to prove that
`{x | f x = y}` is nonempty.
-/
open Function Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {ε : ℝ}
open Filter Metric Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (id)
/-- We say that `f` approximates a continuous linear map `f'` on `s` with constant `c`,
if `‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖` whenever `x, y ∈ s`.
This predicate is defined to facilitate the splitting of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. Some of these lemmas can be useful, e.g., to prove that the inverse function is defined
on a specific set. -/
def ApproximatesLinearOn (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (c : ℝ≥0) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ‖f x - f y - f' (x - y)‖ ≤ c * ‖x - y‖
@[simp]
theorem approximatesLinearOn_empty (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (c : ℝ≥0) :
ApproximatesLinearOn f f' ∅ c := by simp [ApproximatesLinearOn]
namespace ApproximatesLinearOn
variable {f : E → F}
/-! First we prove some properties of a function that `ApproximatesLinearOn` a (not necessarily
invertible) continuous linear map. -/
section
variable {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {s t : Set E} {c c' : ℝ≥0}
theorem mono_num (hc : c ≤ c') (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) :
ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c' := fun x hx y hy =>
le_trans (hf x hx y hy) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hc <| norm_nonneg _)
theorem mono_set (hst : s ⊆ t) (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' t c) :
ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c := fun x hx y hy => hf x (hst hx) y (hst hy)
theorem approximatesLinearOn_iff_lipschitzOnWith {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set E}
{c : ℝ≥0} : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c ↔ LipschitzOnWith c (f - ⇑f') s := by
have : ∀ x y, f x - f y - f' (x - y) = (f - f') x - (f - f') y := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]; abel
simp only [this, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le, ApproximatesLinearOn]
alias ⟨lipschitzOnWith, _root_.LipschitzOnWith.approximatesLinearOn⟩ :=
approximatesLinearOn_iff_lipschitzOnWith
theorem lipschitz_sub (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) :
LipschitzWith c fun x : s => f x - f' x :=
hf.lipschitzOnWith.to_restrict
protected theorem lipschitz (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) :
LipschitzWith (‖f'‖₊ + c) (s.restrict f) := by
simpa only [restrict_apply, add_sub_cancel] using
(f'.lipschitz.restrict s).add hf.lipschitz_sub
protected theorem continuous (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) : Continuous (s.restrict f) :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) : ContinuousOn f s :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.2 hf.continuous
end
section LocallyOnto
/-!
We prove that a function which is linearly approximated by a continuous linear map with a nonlinear
right inverse is locally onto. This will apply to the case where the approximating map is a linear
equivalence, for the local inverse theorem, but also whenever the approximating map is onto,
by Banach's open mapping theorem. -/
variable [CompleteSpace E] {s : Set E} {c : ℝ≥0} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
/-- If a function is linearly approximated by a continuous linear map with a (possibly nonlinear)
right inverse, then it is locally onto: a ball of an explicit radius is included in the image
of the map. -/
theorem surjOn_closedBall_of_nonlinearRightInverse
(hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c)
(f'symm : f'.NonlinearRightInverse) {ε : ℝ} {b : E} (ε0 : 0 ≤ ε) (hε : closedBall b ε ⊆ s) :
SurjOn f (closedBall b ε) (closedBall (f b) (((f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ)⁻¹ - c) * ε)) := by
intro y hy
rcases le_or_lt (f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ)⁻¹ c with hc | hc
· refine ⟨b, by simp [ε0], ?_⟩
have : dist y (f b) ≤ 0 :=
(mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (by linarith) ε0)
simp only [dist_le_zero] at this
rw [this]
have If' : (0 : ℝ) < f'symm.nnnorm := by rw [← inv_pos]; exact (NNReal.coe_nonneg _).trans_lt hc
have Icf' : (c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm < 1 := by rwa [inv_eq_one_div, lt_div_iff₀ If'] at hc
have Jf' : (f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ) ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt If'
have Jcf' : (1 : ℝ) - c * f'symm.nnnorm ≠ 0 := by apply ne_of_gt; linarith
/- We have to show that `y` can be written as `f x` for some `x ∈ closedBall b ε`.
The idea of the proof is to apply the Banach contraction principle to the map
`g : x ↦ x + f'symm (y - f x)`, as a fixed point of this map satisfies `f x = y`.
When `f'symm` is a genuine linear inverse, `g` is a contracting map. In our case, since `f'symm`
is nonlinear, this map is not contracting (it is not even continuous), but still the proof of
the contraction theorem holds: `uₙ = gⁿ b` is a Cauchy sequence, converging exponentially fast
to the desired point `x`. Instead of appealing to general results, we check this by hand.
The main point is that `f (u n)` becomes exponentially close to `y`, and therefore
`dist (u (n+1)) (u n)` becomes exponentally small, making it possible to get an inductive
bound on `dist (u n) b`, from which one checks that `u n` stays in the ball on which one has a
control. Therefore, the bound can be checked at the next step, and so on inductively.
-/
set g := fun x => x + f'symm (y - f x) with hg
set u := fun n : ℕ => g^[n] b with hu
have usucc : ∀ n, u (n + 1) = g (u n) := by simp [hu, ← iterate_succ_apply' g _ b]
-- First bound: if `f z` is close to `y`, then `g z` is close to `z` (i.e., almost a fixed point).
have A : ∀ z, dist (g z) z ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y := by
intro z
rw [dist_eq_norm, hg, add_sub_cancel_left, dist_eq_norm']
exact f'symm.bound _
-- Second bound: if `z` and `g z` are in the set with good control, then `f (g z)` becomes closer
-- to `y` than `f z` was (this uses the linear approximation property, and is the reason for the
-- choice of the formula for `g`).
have B :
∀ z ∈ closedBall b ε,
g z ∈ closedBall b ε → dist (f (g z)) y ≤ c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y := by
intro z hz hgz
set v := f'symm (y - f z)
calc
dist (f (g z)) y = ‖f (z + v) - y‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm]
_ = ‖f (z + v) - f z - f' v + f' v - (y - f z)‖ := by congr 1; abel
_ = ‖f (z + v) - f z - f' (z + v - z)‖ := by
simp only [v, ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse.right_inv, add_sub_cancel_left,
sub_add_cancel]
_ ≤ c * ‖z + v - z‖ := hf _ (hε hgz) _ (hε hz)
_ ≤ c * (f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y) := by
gcongr
simpa [dist_eq_norm'] using f'symm.bound (y - f z)
_ = c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f z) y := by ring
-- Third bound: a complicated bound on `dist w b` (that will show up in the induction) is enough
-- to check that `w` is in the ball on which one has controls. Will be used to check that `u n`
-- belongs to this ball for all `n`.
have C : ∀ (n : ℕ) (w : E), dist w b ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) /
(1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y → w ∈ closedBall b ε := fun n w hw ↦ by
apply hw.trans
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_le_iff₀]; swap; · linarith
calc
(f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ) * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) * dist (f b) y =
f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) := by
ring
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * 1 := by
gcongr
rw [sub_le_self_iff]
positivity
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (((f'symm.nnnorm : ℝ)⁻¹ - c) * ε) := by
rw [mul_one]
gcongr
exact mem_closedBall'.1 hy
_ = ε * (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) := by field_simp; ring
/- Main inductive control: `f (u n)` becomes exponentially close to `y`, and therefore
`dist (u (n+1)) (u n)` becomes exponentally small, making it possible to get an inductive
bound on `dist (u n) b`, from which one checks that `u n` remains in the ball on which we
have estimates. -/
have D : ∀ n : ℕ, dist (f (u n)) y ≤ ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n * dist (f b) y ∧
dist (u n) b ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) /
(1 - (c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y := fun n ↦ by
induction' n with n IH; · simp [hu, le_refl]
rw [usucc]
have Ign : dist (g (u n)) b ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n.succ) /
(1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y :=
calc
dist (g (u n)) b ≤ dist (g (u n)) (u n) + dist (u n) b := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y + dist (u n) b := add_le_add (A _) le_rfl
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n * dist (f b) y) +
f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n) / (1 - c * f'symm.nnnorm) *
dist (f b) y := by
gcongr
· exact IH.1
· exact IH.2
_ = f'symm.nnnorm * (1 - ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n.succ) /
(1 - (c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) * dist (f b) y := by
field_simp [Jcf', pow_succ]; ring
refine ⟨?_, Ign⟩
calc
dist (f (g (u n))) y ≤ c * f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y :=
B _ (C n _ IH.2) (C n.succ _ Ign)
_ ≤ (c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm * (((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n * dist (f b) y) := by
gcongr
apply IH.1
_ = ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n.succ * dist (f b) y := by simp only [pow_succ']; ring
-- Deduce from the inductive bound that `uₙ` is a Cauchy sequence, therefore converging.
have : CauchySeq u := by
refine cauchySeq_of_le_geometric _ (↑f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y) Icf' fun n ↦ ?_
calc
dist (u n) (u (n + 1)) = dist (g (u n)) (u n) := by rw [usucc, dist_comm]
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f (u n)) y := A _
_ ≤ f'symm.nnnorm * (((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n * dist (f b) y) := by
gcongr
exact (D n).1
_ = f'symm.nnnorm * dist (f b) y * ((c : ℝ) * f'symm.nnnorm) ^ n := by ring
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) := cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete this
-- As all the `uₙ` belong to the ball `closedBall b ε`, so does their limit `x`.
have xmem : x ∈ closedBall b ε :=
isClosed_closedBall.mem_of_tendsto hx (Eventually.of_forall fun n => C n _ (D n).2)
refine ⟨x, xmem, ?_⟩
-- It remains to check that `f x = y`. This follows from continuity of `f` on `closedBall b ε`
-- and from the fact that `f uₙ` is converging to `y` by construction.
have hx' : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝[closedBall b ε] x) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf, hx, true_and, tendsto_principal]
exact Eventually.of_forall fun n => C n _ (D n).2
have T1 : Tendsto (f ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
(hf.continuousOn.mono hε x xmem).tendsto.comp hx'
have T2 : Tendsto (f ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 y) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
refine squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) (fun n => (D n).1) ?_
simpa using (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (by positivity) Icf').mul tendsto_const_nhds
exact tendsto_nhds_unique T1 T2
theorem open_image (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.NonlinearRightInverse)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hc : Subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) : IsOpen (f '' s) := by
rcases hc with hE | hc
· exact isOpen_discrete _
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff, forall_mem_image] at hs ⊢
intro x hx
rcases hs x hx with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
refine ⟨(f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹ - c) * ε, mul_pos (sub_pos.2 hc) ε0, ?_⟩
exact (hf.surjOn_closedBall_of_nonlinearRightInverse f'symm (le_of_lt ε0) hε).mono hε Subset.rfl
theorem image_mem_nhds (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.NonlinearRightInverse)
{x : E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hc : Subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) : f '' s ∈ 𝓝 (f x) := by
obtain ⟨t, hts, ht, xt⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 hs
have := IsOpen.mem_nhds ((hf.mono_set hts).open_image f'symm ht hc) (mem_image_of_mem _ xt)
exact mem_of_superset this (image_subset _ hts)
theorem map_nhds_eq (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c) (f'symm : f'.NonlinearRightInverse) {x : E}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hc : Subsingleton F ∨ c < f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹) : map f (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine
le_antisymm ((hf.continuousOn x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).continuousAt hs) (le_map fun t ht => ?_)
have : f '' (s ∩ t) ∈ 𝓝 (f x) :=
(hf.mono_set inter_subset_left).image_mem_nhds f'symm (inter_mem hs ht) hc
exact mem_of_superset this (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
end LocallyOnto
/-!
From now on we assume that `f` approximates an invertible continuous linear map `f : E ≃L[𝕜] F`.
We also assume that either `E = {0}`, or `c < ‖f'⁻¹‖⁻¹`. We use `N` as an abbreviation for `‖f'⁻¹‖`.
-/
variable {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {s : Set E} {c : ℝ≥0}
local notation "N" => ‖(f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖₊
protected theorem antilipschitz (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : AntilipschitzWith (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ (s.restrict f) := by
rcases hc with hE | hc
· exact AntilipschitzWith.of_subsingleton
convert (f'.antilipschitz.restrict s).add_lipschitzWith hf.lipschitz_sub hc
simp [restrict]
protected theorem injective (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : Injective (s.restrict f) :=
(hf.antilipschitz hc).injective
protected theorem injOn (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : InjOn f s :=
injOn_iff_injective.2 <| hf.injective hc
protected theorem surjective [CompleteSpace E] (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) univ c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : Surjective f := by
rcases hc with hE | hc
· haveI : Subsingleton F := (Equiv.subsingleton_congr f'.toEquiv).1 hE
exact surjective_to_subsingleton _
· apply forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (fun y : F => ∃ a, f a = y) (f 0) _
have hc' : (0 : ℝ) < N⁻¹ - c := by rw [sub_pos]; exact hc
let p : ℝ → Prop := fun R => closedBall (f 0) R ⊆ Set.range f
have hp : ∀ᶠ r : ℝ in atTop, p ((N⁻¹ - c) * r) := by
have hr : ∀ᶠ r : ℝ in atTop, 0 ≤ r := eventually_ge_atTop 0
refine hr.mono fun r hr => Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset_range f (closedBall 0 r))
refine hf.surjOn_closedBall_of_nonlinearRightInverse f'.toNonlinearRightInverse hr ?_
exact subset_univ _
refine ((tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop hc').frequently hp.frequently).mono ?_
exact fun R h y hy => h hy
/-- A map approximating a linear equivalence on a set defines a partial equivalence on this set.
Should not be used outside of this file, because it is superseded by `toPartialHomeomorph` below.
This is a first step towards the inverse function. -/
def toPartialEquiv (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : PartialEquiv E F :=
(hf.injOn hc).toPartialEquiv _ _
/-- The inverse function is continuous on `f '' s`.
Use properties of `PartialHomeomorph` instead. -/
theorem inverse_continuousOn (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : ContinuousOn (hf.toPartialEquiv hc).symm (f '' s) := by
apply continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.2
refine ((hf.antilipschitz hc).to_rightInvOn' ?_ (hf.toPartialEquiv hc).right_inv').continuous
exact fun x hx => (hf.toPartialEquiv hc).map_target hx
/-- The inverse function is approximated linearly on `f '' s` by `f'.symm`. -/
theorem to_inv (hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c) (hc : Subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
ApproximatesLinearOn (hf.toPartialEquiv hc).symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f '' s)
(N * (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ * c) := fun x hx y hy ↦ by
set A := hf.toPartialEquiv hc
have Af : ∀ z, A z = f z := fun z => rfl
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨x', x's, rfl⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hy with ⟨y', y's, rfl⟩
rw [← Af x', ← Af y', A.left_inv x's, A.left_inv y's]
calc
‖x' - y' - f'.symm (A x' - A y')‖ ≤ N * ‖f' (x' - y' - f'.symm (A x' - A y'))‖ :=
(f' : E →L[𝕜] F).bound_of_antilipschitz f'.antilipschitz _
_ = N * ‖A y' - A x' - f' (y' - x')‖ := by
congr 2
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.map_sub]
abel
_ ≤ N * (c * ‖y' - x'‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _ y's _ x's) (NNReal.coe_nonneg _)
| _ ≤ N * (c * (((N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) * ‖A y' - A x'‖)) := by
gcongr
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact (hf.antilipschitz hc).le_mul_dist ⟨y', y's⟩ ⟨x', x's⟩
_ = (N * (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ * c : ℝ≥0) * ‖A x' - A y'‖ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/ApproximatesLinearOn.lean | 369 | 373 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
@[to_additive nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
| attribute [field_simps] div_pow div_zpow
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 622 | 623 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.MonoidWithZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Ring
/-!
# Localizations of commutative rings
This file contains various basic results on localizations.
We characterize the localization of a commutative ring `R` at a submonoid `M` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative ring `S` is the localization of `R` at `M` iff we can find a
ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ M`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : S`, there exists `(x, y) : R × M` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : R` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ M` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
In the following, let `R, P` be commutative rings, `S, Q` be `R`- and `P`-algebras
and `M, T` be submonoids of `R` and `P` respectively, e.g.:
```
variable (R S P Q : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing P] [CommRing Q]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra P Q] (M : Submonoid R) (T : Submonoid P)
```
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.algEquiv`: if `Q` is another localization of `R` at `M`, then `S` and `Q`
are isomorphic as `R`-algebras
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
A previous version of this file used a fully bundled type of ring localization maps,
then used a type synonym `f.codomain` for `f : LocalizationMap M S` to instantiate the
`R`-algebra structure on `S`. This results in defining ad-hoc copies for everything already
defined on `S`. By making `IsLocalization` a predicate on the `algebraMap R S`,
we can ensure the localization map commutes nicely with other `algebraMap`s.
To prove most lemmas about a localization map `algebraMap R S` in this file we invoke the
corresponding proof for the underlying `CommMonoid` localization map
`IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap M S`, which can be found in `GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization`
and the namespace `Submonoid.LocalizationMap`.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_of_mk'` and associated lemmas.
These show the quotient map `mk : R → M → Localization M` equals the surjection
`LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map `algebraMap : R →+* Localization M`.
The lemma `mk_eq_of_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file,
which are about the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
The proof that "a `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R \ {0}`
is a field" is a `def` rather than an `instance`, so if you want to reason about a field of
fractions `K`, assume `[Field K]` instead of just `[CommRing K]`.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Function
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
variable {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommSemiring (R i)]
variable {i : ι} (S : Submonoid (R i))
/-- `IsLocalization.map` applied to a projection homomorphism from a product ring. -/
noncomputable abbrev mapPiEvalRingHom :
Localization (S.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i) →+* Localization S :=
map (T := S) _ (Pi.evalRingHom R i) le_rfl
open Function in
theorem mapPiEvalRingHom_bijective : Bijective (mapPiEvalRingHom S) := by
let T := S.comap (Pi.evalRingHom R i)
classical
refine ⟨fun x₁ x₂ eq ↦ ?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r₁, s₁, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₁
obtain ⟨r₂, s₂, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₂
simp_rw [map_mk'] at eq
rw [IsLocalization.eq] at eq ⊢
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := eq
refine ⟨⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩, funext fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa using hs
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
· obtain ⟨r, s, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective S x
exact ⟨mk' (M := T) _ (update 0 i r) ⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩,
by simp [map_mk']⟩
end Localization
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M N : Submonoid R} {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
namespace IsLocalization
section IsLocalization
variable [IsLocalization M S]
variable (M S) in
include M in
theorem linearMap_compatibleSMul (N₁ N₂) [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₁]
[Module S N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module S N₂] [IsScalarTower R S N₁] [IsScalarTower R S N₂] :
LinearMap.CompatibleSMul N₁ N₂ S R where
map_smul f s s' := by
obtain ⟨r, m, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M s
rw [← (map_units S m).smul_left_cancel]
simp_rw [algebraMap_smul, ← map_smul, ← smul_assoc, smul_mk'_self, algebraMap_smul, map_smul]
variable {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y))
variable (M) in
include M in
-- This is not an instance since the submonoid `M` would become a metavariable in typeclass search.
theorem algHom_subsingleton [Algebra R P] : Subsingleton (S →ₐ[R] P) :=
⟨fun f g =>
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective <|
IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M <| by rw [f.comp_algebraMap, g.comp_algebraMap]⟩
section AlgEquiv
variable {Q : Type*} [CommSemiring Q] [Algebra R Q] [IsLocalization M Q]
section
variable (M S Q)
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` at the submonoid `M` respectively,
there is an isomorphism of localizations `S ≃ₐ[R] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : S ≃ₐ[R] Q :=
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q (RingEquiv.refl R) M.map_id with
commutes' := ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ }
end
theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S Q (mk' S x y) = mk' Q x y := by
simp
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S Q).symm (mk' Q x y) = mk' S x y := by simp
variable (M) in
include M in
protected lemma bijective (f : S →+* Q) (hf : f.comp (algebraMap R S) = algebraMap R Q) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(show f = IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q by
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M; rw [hf]; ext; simp) ▸
(IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q).toEquiv.bijective
end AlgEquiv
section liftAlgHom
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R}
{S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] [IsLocalization M S]
{f : R →ₐ[A] P} (hf : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (f y)) (x : S)
include hf
/-- `AlgHom` version of `IsLocalization.lift`. -/
noncomputable def liftAlgHom : S →ₐ[A] P where
__ := lift hf
commutes' r := show lift hf (algebraMap A S r) = _ by
simp [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S]
theorem liftAlgHom_toRingHom : (liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P).toRingHom = lift hf := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftAlgHom : ⇑(liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P) = lift hf := rfl
theorem liftAlgHom_apply : liftAlgHom hf x = lift hf x := rfl
end liftAlgHom
section AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*)
[CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S] [IsLocalization M S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] {T : Submonoid P} (Q : Type*)
[CommSemiring Q] [Algebra A Q] [Algebra P Q] [IsScalarTower A P Q] [IsLocalization T Q]
(h : R ≃ₐ[A] P) (H : Submonoid.map h M = T)
include H
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` and `P` at submonoids `M`, `T` respectively,
an isomorphism `h : R ≃ₐ[A] P` such that `h(M) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations
`S ≃ₐ[A] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquivOfAlgEquiv : S ≃ₐ[A] Q where
__ := ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q h.toRingEquiv H
commutes' _ := by dsimp; rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S, map_eq,
RingHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.commutes, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A P Q]
variable {S Q h}
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq_map :
(algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H : S →+* Q) =
map Q (h : R →+* P) (M.le_comap_of_map_le (le_of_eq H)) :=
rfl
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq (x : R) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H ((algebraMap R S) x) = algebraMap P Q (h x) := by
simp
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H (mk' S x y) =
mk' Q (h x) ⟨h y, show h y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem h y.2⟩ := by
simp [map_mk']
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_symm : (algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H).symm =
algEquivOfAlgEquiv Q S h.symm (show Submonoid.map h.symm T = M by
rw [← H, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv, AlgEquiv.symm_toMulEquiv,
← Submonoid.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv,
Submonoid.comap_map_eq_of_injective (h : R ≃* P).injective]) := rfl
end AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
section at_units
variable (R M)
/-- The localization at a module of units is isomorphic to the ring. -/
noncomputable def atUnits (H : M ≤ IsUnit.submonoid R) : R ≃ₐ[R] S := by
refine AlgEquiv.ofBijective (Algebra.ofId R S) ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro x y hxy
obtain ⟨c, eq⟩ := (IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp hxy
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H c.prop
rwa [← hu, Units.mul_right_inj] at eq
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, eq⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M y
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H s.prop
use x * u.inv
dsimp [Algebra.ofId, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_mks]
rw [RingHom.map_mul, ← eq, ← hu, mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
simp
end at_units
end IsLocalization
section
variable (M N)
theorem isLocalization_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization M S] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M P := by
constructor
· intro y
convert (IsLocalization.map_units S y).map h.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toMonoidHom
exact (h.commutes y).symm
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M (h.symm y)
apply_fun (show S → P from h) at e
simp only [map_mul, h.apply_symm_apply, h.commutes] at e
exact ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩
· intro x y
rw [← h.symm.toEquiv.injective.eq_iff, ← IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S, ← h.symm.commutes, ←
h.symm.commutes]
exact id
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization M P :=
⟨fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h, fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h.symm⟩
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (h : S ≃+* P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔
haveI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra; IsLocalization M P :=
letI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra
isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv M { h with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
variable (S) in
/-- If an algebra is simultaneously localizations for two submonoids, then an arbitrary algebra
is a localization of one submonoid iff it is a localization of the other. -/
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization [IsLocalization M S] [IsLocalization N S]
[Algebra R P] : IsLocalization M P ↔ IsLocalization N P :=
⟨fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv N (algEquiv M S P),
fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv M (algEquiv N S P)⟩
theorem iff_of_le_of_exists_dvd (N : Submonoid R) (h₁ : M ≤ N) (h₂ : ∀ n ∈ N, ∃ m ∈ M, n ∣ m) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization N S :=
have : IsLocalization N (Localization M) := of_le_of_exists_dvd _ _ h₁ h₂
isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization _ _ (Localization M)
end
variable (M)
/-- If `S₁` is the localization of `R` at `M₁` and `S₂` is the localization of
`R` at `M₂`, then every localization `T` of `S₂` at `M₁` is also a localization of
`S₁` at `M₂`, in other words `M₁⁻¹M₂⁻¹R` can be identified with `M₂⁻¹M₁⁻¹R`. -/
lemma commutes (S₁ S₂ T : Type*) [CommSemiring S₁]
[CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R S₁] [Algebra R S₂] [Algebra R T] [Algebra S₁ T]
[Algebra S₂ T] [IsScalarTower R S₁ T] [IsScalarTower R S₂ T] (M₁ M₂ : Submonoid R)
[IsLocalization M₁ S₁] [IsLocalization M₂ S₂]
[IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) T] :
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₁ M₂) T where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨m, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
exact IsUnit.map _ (IsLocalization.map_units' ⟨a, ha⟩)
surj' a := by
obtain ⟨⟨y, -, m, hm, rfl⟩, hy⟩ := surj (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) a
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₁ T] at hy
obtain ⟨⟨z, n, hn⟩, hz⟩ := IsLocalization.surj (M := M₂) y
have hunit : IsUnit (algebraMap R S₁ m) := map_units' ⟨m, hm⟩
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ z * hunit.unit⁻¹, ⟨algebraMap R S₁ n, n, hn, rfl⟩⟩
rw [map_mul, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
conv_rhs => rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T, ← hz, map_mul, ← hy]
convert_to _ = a * (algebraMap S₂ T) ((algebraMap R S₂) n) *
(algebraMap S₁ T) (((algebraMap R S₁) m) * hunit.unit⁻¹.val)
· rw [map_mul]
ring
simp
exists_of_eq {x y} hxy := by
obtain ⟨r, s, d, hr, hs⟩ := IsLocalization.surj₂ M₁ S₁ x y
apply_fun (· * algebraMap S₁ T (algebraMap R S₁ d)) at hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul, hr, hs, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T] at hxy
obtain ⟨⟨-, c, hmc, rfl⟩, hc⟩ := exists_of_eq (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul] at hc
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := IsLocalization.exists_of_eq (M := M₂) hc
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ a, a, a.property, rfl⟩
apply (map_units S₁ d).mul_right_cancel
rw [mul_assoc, hr, mul_assoc, hs]
apply (map_units S₁ ⟨c, hmc⟩).mul_right_cancel
rw [← map_mul, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ c, ha, map_mul, map_mul]
ring
end IsLocalization
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
theorem mk_natCast (m : ℕ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℕ) _
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
variable (S) (M)
/-- The localization of `R` at `M` as a quotient type is isomorphic to any other localization. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : Localization M ≃ₐ[R] S :=
IsLocalization.algEquiv M _ _
/-- The localization of a singleton is a singleton. Cannot be an instance due to metavariables. -/
noncomputable def _root_.IsLocalization.unique (R Rₘ) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring Rₘ]
(M : Submonoid R) [Subsingleton R] [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] : Unique Rₘ :=
have : Inhabited Rₘ := ⟨1⟩
(algEquiv M Rₘ).symm.injective.unique
end
nonrec theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S (mk' (Localization M) x y) = mk' S x y :=
algEquiv_mk' _ _
nonrec theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
(algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk' (Localization M) x y :=
algEquiv_symm_mk' _ _
theorem algEquiv_mk (x y) : algEquiv M S (mk x y) = mk' S x y := by rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_mk']
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk x y := by
rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_symm_mk']
lemma coe_algEquiv :
(Localization.algEquiv M S : Localization M →+* S) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
lemma coe_algEquiv_symm :
((Localization.algEquiv M S).symm : S →+* Localization M) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
end Localization
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
namespace Localization
theorem mk_intCast (m : ℤ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℤ) _
end Localization
open IsLocalization
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem IsField.localization_map_bijective {R Rₘ : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing Rₘ]
{M : Submonoid R} (hM : (0 : R) ∉ M) (hR : IsField R) [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap R Rₘ) := by
letI := hR.toField
replace hM := le_nonZeroDivisors_of_noZeroDivisors hM
refine ⟨IsLocalization.injective _ hM, fun x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨r, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M x
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero <| hM hm)
exact ⟨r * n, by rw [eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, _root_.mul_comm n, hn, mul_one]⟩
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem Field.localization_map_bijective {K Kₘ : Type*} [Field K] [CommRing Kₘ] {M : Submonoid K}
(hM : (0 : K) ∉ M) [Algebra K Kₘ] [IsLocalization M Kₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap K Kₘ) :=
(Field.toIsField K).localization_map_bijective hM
-- this looks weird due to the `letI` inside the above lemma, but trying to do it the other
-- way round causes issues with defeq of instances, so this is actually easier.
section Algebra
variable {S} {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ]
variable [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ]
variable [Algebra S Sₘ] [i : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
include S
section
variable (S M)
/-- Definition of the natural algebra induced by the localization of an algebra.
Given an algebra `R → S`, a submonoid `R` of `M`, and a localization `Rₘ` for `M`,
let `Sₘ` be the localization of `S` to the image of `M` under `algebraMap R S`.
Then this is the natural algebra structure on `Rₘ → Sₘ`, such that the entire square commutes,
where `localization_map.map_comp` gives the commutativity of the underlying maps.
This instance can be helpful if you define `Sₘ := Localization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M)`,
however we will instead use the hypotheses `[Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ]` in lemmas
since the algebra structure may arise in different ways.
-/
noncomputable def localizationAlgebra : Algebra Rₘ Sₘ :=
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* Sₘ).toAlgebra
end
section
variable [Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [Algebra R Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R S Sₘ]
variable (S Rₘ Sₘ)
theorem IsLocalization.map_units_map_submonoid (y : M) : IsUnit (algebraMap R Sₘ y) := by
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ S]
exact IsLocalization.map_units Sₘ ⟨algebraMap R S y, Algebra.mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem y⟩
-- can't be simp, as `S` only appears on the RHS
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ (IsLocalization.mk' Rₘ x y) =
IsLocalization.mk' Sₘ (algebraMap R S x)
⟨algebraMap R S y, Algebra.mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem y⟩ := by
rw [IsLocalization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, Subtype.coe_mk, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ, ← map_mul, mul_comm,
IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
exact congr_arg (algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ) (IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_left x y)
variable (M)
/-- If the square below commutes, the bottom map is uniquely specified:
```
R → S
↓ ↓
Rₘ → Sₘ
```
-/
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_eq_map_map_submonoid :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :=
Eq.symm <|
IsLocalization.map_unique _ (algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ) fun x => by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S Sₘ, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ]
/-- If the square below commutes, the bottom map is uniquely specified:
```
R → S
↓ ↓
Rₘ → Sₘ
```
-/
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_apply_eq_map_map_submonoid (x) :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ x =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (IsLocalization.algebraMap_eq_map_map_submonoid _ _ _ _) x
theorem IsLocalization.lift_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap :
IsLocalization.lift (M := M) (IsLocalization.map_units_map_submonoid S Sₘ) =
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ :=
IsLocalization.lift_unique _ fun _ => (IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm
end
variable (Rₘ Sₘ)
theorem localizationAlgebraMap_def :
@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S) =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :=
rfl
/-- Injectivity of the underlying `algebraMap` descends to the algebra induced by localization. -/
theorem localizationAlgebra_injective (hRS : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) :
Function.Injective (@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S)) :=
have : IsLocalization (M.map (algebraMap R S)) Sₘ := i
IsLocalization.map_injective_of_injective _ _ _ hRS
end Algebra
end CommRing
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean | 1,098 | 1,099 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condExp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condExp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
variable (E) in
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condExp_zero]; simp⟩
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
theorem condExp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_eq := condExp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condExp.congr (hf.condExp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).trans
((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condExp_neg ..).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condExp_smul ..).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
theorem supermartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
theorem submartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
end Martingale
theorem martingale_iff [PartialOrder E] :
Martingale f ℱ μ ↔ Supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩, fun ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨hf₁.1, fun i j hij => (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
theorem martingale_condExp (f : Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω)
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] : Martingale (fun i => μ[f|ℱ i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨fun _ => stronglyMeasurable_condExp, fun _ j hij => condExp_condExp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) (ℱ.le j)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias martingale_condexp := martingale_condExp
namespace Supermartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
theorem condExp_ae_le [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_le := condExp_ae_le
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_mono_ae integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hf.integrable i).integrableOn ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ heq using heq
theorem add [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).le.trans ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.supermartingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_neg ..).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
theorem ae_le_condExp [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i] :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ae_le_condexp := ae_le_condExp
theorem add [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.submartingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => (condExp_neg ..).le.trans ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
/-- The converse of this lemma is `MeasureTheory.submartingale_of_setIntegral_le`. -/
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← integral_neg, ← integral_neg]
exact Supermartingale.setIntegral_le hf.neg hij hs
theorem sub_supermartingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_supermartingale hg.supermartingale
protected theorem sup {f g : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (f ⊔ g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => @StronglyMeasurable.sup _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) _ _ _ (hf.adapted i) (hg.adapted i),
fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => Integrable.sup (hf.integrable _) (hg.integrable _)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.sup_le ?_ ?_
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf.2.1 i j hij)
(condExp_mono (hf.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => le_max_left _ _))
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hg.2.1 i j hij)
(condExp_mono (hg.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => le_max_right _ _))
protected theorem pos {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f⁺) ℱ μ :=
hf.sup (martingale_zero _ _ _).submartingale
end Submartingale
section Submartingale
theorem submartingale_of_setIntegral_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j : ι,
i ≤ j → ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
suffices f i ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] by exact ae_le_of_ae_le_trim this
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] - f i by
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
rwa [← sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
((integrable_condExp.sub (hint i)).trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.sub <| hadp i))
fun s hs _ => ?_
specialize hf i j hij s hs
rwa [← setIntegral_trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.sub <| hadp i) hs,
integral_sub' integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hint i).integrableOn, sub_nonneg,
setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hint j) hs]
theorem submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i]) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
rw [← condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hadp _) (hint _), ← eventually_sub_nonneg]
exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf i j hij) (condExp_sub (hint _) (hint _) _).le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg := submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.condExp_sub_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι}
(hij : i ≤ j) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] := by
by_cases h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (ℱ.le i))
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite (ℱ.le i) h]
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_sub (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _) _).symm.le
rw [eventually_sub_nonneg,
condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.adapted _) (hf.integrable _)]
exact hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias Submartingale.condexp_sub_nonneg := Submartingale.condExp_sub_nonneg
theorem submartingale_iff_condExp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} :
Submartingale f ℱ μ ↔
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.adapted, h.integrable, fun _ _ => h.condExp_sub_nonneg⟩, fun ⟨hadp, hint, h⟩ =>
submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg hadp hint h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_iff_condexp_sub_nonneg := submartingale_iff_condExp_sub_nonneg
end Submartingale
namespace Supermartingale
theorem sub_submartingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_submartingale hg.submartingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [Lattice F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
[OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).smul c⟩
filter_upwards [condExp_smul c (f j) (ℱ i), hf.2.1 i j hij] with ω hω hle
simpa only [hω, Pi.smul_apply] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hle hc
theorem smul_nonpos [IsOrderedAddMonoid F] {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ}
(hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
end
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [Lattice F] [IsOrderedAddMonoid F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] [OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(c • -f))]
exact Supermartingale.neg (hf.neg.smul_nonneg hc)
theorem smul_nonpos {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
end
end Submartingale
section Nat
variable {𝒢 : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ) :
Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_of_setIntegral_le hadp hint fun i j hij s hs => ?_
induction' hij with k hk₁ hk₂
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans hk₂ (hf k s (𝒢.mono hk₁ _ hs))
theorem supermartingale_of_setIntegral_succ_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ) :
Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) ?_).neg
simpa only [integral_neg, Pi.neg_apply, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem martingale_of_setIntegral_eq_succ [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ) :
Martingale f 𝒢 μ :=
martingale_iff.2 ⟨supermartingale_of_setIntegral_succ_le hadp hint fun i s hs => (hf i s hs).ge,
submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp hint fun i s hs => (hf i s hs).le⟩
theorem submartingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) :
Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp hint fun i s hs => ?_
have : ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, (μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) ω ∂μ :=
(setIntegral_condExp (𝒢.le i) (hint _) hs).symm
rw [this]
exact setIntegral_mono_ae (hint i).integrableOn integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hf i)
theorem supermartingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) :
Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_nat hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) fun i =>
EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_neg ..).symm.le).neg
filter_upwards [hf i] with x hx using neg_le_neg hx
theorem martingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) : Martingale f 𝒢 μ :=
martingale_iff.2 ⟨supermartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => (hf i).symm.le,
submartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => (hf i).le⟩
theorem submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1) - f i|𝒢 i]) : Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => ?_
rw [← condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (𝒢.le _) (hadp _) (hint _), ← eventually_sub_nonneg]
exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf i) (condExp_sub (hint _) (hint _) _).le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg_nat := submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat
theorem supermartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f i - f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) : Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) ?_).neg
simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.neg_apply, neg_sub_neg]
|
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias supermartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg_nat := supermartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat
theorem martingale_of_condExp_sub_eq_zero_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, μ[f (i + 1) - f i|𝒢 i] =ᵐ[μ] 0) : Martingale f 𝒢 μ := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 421 | 427 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.Comparison
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ExtensiveSheaves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ReflectsPrecoherent
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ReflectsPreregular
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.DenseSubsite.InducedTopology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Whiskering
/-!
# Categories of coherent sheaves
Given a fully faithful functor `F : C ⥤ D` into a precoherent category, which preserves and reflects
finite effective epi families, and satisfies the property `F.EffectivelyEnough` (meaning that to
every object in `C` there is an effective epi from an object in the image of `F`), the categories
of coherent sheaves on `C` and `D` are equivalent (see
`CategoryTheory.coherentTopology.equivalence`).
The main application of this equivalence is the characterisation of condensed sets as coherent
sheaves on either `CompHaus`, `Profinite` or `Stonean`. See the file `Condensed/Equivalence.lean`
We give the corresponding result for the regular topology as well (see
`CategoryTheory.regularTopology.equivalence`).
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits Functor regularTopology
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
namespace coherentTopology
variable [F.PreservesFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies] [F.ReflectsFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful] [F.EffectivelyEnough] [Precoherent D]
instance : F.IsCoverDense (coherentTopology _) := by
refine F.isCoverDense_of_generate_singleton_functor_π_mem _ fun B ↦ ⟨_, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_⟩
apply Coverage.Saturate.of
refine ⟨Unit, inferInstance, fun _ => F.effectiveEpiOverObj B,
fun _ => F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_ , ?_⟩
· funext; ext -- Do we want `Presieve.ext`?
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟩ ↦ ⟨()⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
simp
· rw [← effectiveEpi_iff_effectiveEpiFamily]
infer_instance
theorem exists_effectiveEpiFamily_iff_mem_induced (X : C) (S : Sieve X) :
(∃ (α : Type) (_ : Finite α) (Y : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (Y a ⟶ X)),
EffectiveEpiFamily Y π ∧ (∀ a : α, (S.arrows) (π a)) ) ↔
(S ∈ F.inducedTopology (coherentTopology _) X) := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨α, _, Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ ↦ ?_, fun hS ↦ ?_⟩
· apply (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily (Sieve.functorPushforward _ S)).mpr
refine ⟨α, inferInstance, fun i => F.obj (Y i),
fun i => F.map (π i), ⟨?_,
fun a => Sieve.image_mem_functorPushforward F S (H₂ a)⟩⟩
exact F.map_finite_effectiveEpiFamily _ _
· obtain ⟨α, _, Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ := (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily _).mp hS
refine ⟨α, inferInstance, ?_⟩
let Z : α → C := fun a ↦ (Functor.EffectivelyEnough.presentation (F := F) (Y a)).some.p
let g₀ : (a : α) → F.obj (Z a) ⟶ Y a := fun a ↦ F.effectiveEpiOver (Y a)
have : EffectiveEpiFamily _ (fun a ↦ g₀ a ≫ π a) := inferInstance
refine ⟨Z , fun a ↦ F.preimage (g₀ a ≫ π a), ?_, fun a ↦ (?_ : S.arrows (F.preimage _))⟩
· refine F.finite_effectiveEpiFamily_of_map _ _ ?_
simpa using this
· obtain ⟨W, g₁, g₂, h₁, h₂⟩ := H₂ a
rw [h₂]
convert S.downward_closed h₁ (F.preimage (g₀ a ≫ g₂))
exact F.map_injective (by simp)
lemma eq_induced : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
coherentTopology C =
F.inducedTopology (coherentTopology _) := by
ext X S
have := F.reflects_precoherent
rw [← exists_effectiveEpiFamily_iff_mem_induced F X]
rw [← coherentTopology.mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily S]
instance : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent;
F.IsDenseSubsite (coherentTopology C) (coherentTopology D) where
functorPushforward_mem_iff := by
rw [eq_induced F]
rfl
lemma coverPreserving : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
CoverPreserving (coherentTopology _) (coherentTopology _) F :=
IsDenseSubsite.coverPreserving _ _ _
section SheafEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies] [F.ReflectsFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[Precoherent D]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from coherent sheaves on `C` to coherent sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a precoherent category, which preserves and reflects effective epimorphic
families, and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A] [∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (coherentTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end SheafEquiv
section RegularExtensive
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[FinitaryExtensive D] [Preregular D]
[FinitaryPreExtensive C]
[PreservesFiniteCoproducts F]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from coherent sheaves on `C` to coherent sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to an extensive preregular category, which preserves and reflects effective
epimorphisms and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence' (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A]
[∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (coherentTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end RegularExtensive
end coherentTopology
namespace regularTopology
variable [F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis] [F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[F.EffectivelyEnough] [Preregular D]
instance : F.IsCoverDense (regularTopology _) := by
refine F.isCoverDense_of_generate_singleton_functor_π_mem _ fun B ↦ ⟨_, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_⟩
apply Coverage.Saturate.of
refine ⟨F.effectiveEpiOverObj B, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_, inferInstance⟩
funext; ext -- Do we want `Presieve.ext`?
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟩ ↦ ⟨()⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
simp
theorem exists_effectiveEpi_iff_mem_induced (X : C) (S : Sieve X) :
(∃ (Y : C) (π : Y ⟶ X),
EffectiveEpi π ∧ S.arrows π) ↔
(S ∈ F.inducedTopology (regularTopology _) X) := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ ↦ ?_, fun hS ↦ ?_⟩
· apply (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi (Sieve.functorPushforward _ S)).mpr
refine ⟨F.obj Y, F.map π, ⟨?_, Sieve.image_mem_functorPushforward F S H₂⟩⟩
exact F.map_effectiveEpi _
· obtain ⟨Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ := (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi _).mp hS
let g₀ := F.effectiveEpiOver Y
refine ⟨_, F.preimage (g₀ ≫ π), ?_, (?_ : S.arrows (F.preimage _))⟩
· refine F.effectiveEpi_of_map _ ?_
simp only [map_preimage]
infer_instance
· obtain ⟨W, g₁, g₂, h₁, h₂⟩ := H₂
rw [h₂]
convert S.downward_closed h₁ (F.preimage (g₀ ≫ g₂))
exact F.map_injective (by simp)
lemma eq_induced : haveI := F.reflects_preregular
regularTopology C =
F.inducedTopology (regularTopology _) := by
ext X S
have := F.reflects_preregular
rw [← exists_effectiveEpi_iff_mem_induced F X]
rw [← mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi S]
instance : haveI := F.reflects_preregular;
F.IsDenseSubsite (regularTopology C) (regularTopology D) where
functorPushforward_mem_iff := by
rw [eq_induced F]
rfl
lemma coverPreserving : haveI := F.reflects_preregular
CoverPreserving (regularTopology _) (regularTopology _) F :=
IsDenseSubsite.coverPreserving _ _ _
section SheafEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[Preregular D]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from regular sheaves on `C` to regular sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a preregular category, which preserves and reflects effective
epimorphisms and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A] [∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_preregular
Sheaf (regularTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (regularTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end SheafEquiv
end regularTopology
namespace Presheaf
variable {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A] (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A)
theorem isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive [Preregular C] [FinitaryPreExtensive C] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔
IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C) F ∧ IsSheaf (regularTopology C) F := by
rw [← extensive_regular_generate_coherent]
exact isSheaf_sup (extensiveCoverage C) (regularCoverage C) F
theorem isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition
[Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ PreservesFiniteProducts F ∧
EqualizerCondition F := by
rw [isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive]
exact and_congr (isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts _)
(@equalizerCondition_iff_isSheaf _ _ _ _ F _ h).symm
noncomputable instance [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
(F : Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A) : PreservesFiniteProducts F.val :=
(Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts F.val).1
((Presheaf.isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive F.val).mp F.cond).1
theorem isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_of_projective [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ PreservesFiniteProducts F := by
rw [isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive, and_iff_left (isSheaf_of_projective F),
isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts]
theorem isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C) F := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_of_projective, isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts]
/--
The categories of coherent sheaves and extensive sheaves on `C` are equivalent if `C` is
preregular, finitary extensive, and every object is projective.
-/
@[simps]
def coherentExtensiveEquivalence [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C] [∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (extensiveTopology C) A where
functor := {
obj := fun F ↦ ⟨F.val, (isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective F.val).mp F.cond⟩
map := fun f ↦ ⟨f.val⟩ }
inverse := {
obj := fun F ↦ ⟨F.val, (isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective F.val).mpr F.cond⟩
map := fun f ↦ ⟨f.val⟩ }
unitIso := Iso.refl _
counitIso := Iso.refl _
variable {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B]
variable (s : A ⥤ B)
lemma isSheaf_coherent_of_hasPullbacks_comp [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f] [PreservesFiniteLimits s]
(hF : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F) : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) (F ⋙ s) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition (h := h)] at hF ⊢
have := hF.1
refine ⟨inferInstance, fun _ _ π _ c hc ↦ ⟨?_⟩⟩
exact isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit s _ (hF.2 π c hc).some
lemma isSheaf_coherent_of_hasPullbacks_of_comp [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f]
[ReflectsFiniteLimits s]
(hF : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) (F ⋙ s)) : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition (h := h)] at hF ⊢
obtain ⟨_, hF₂⟩ := hF
refine ⟨⟨fun n ↦ ⟨fun {K} ↦ ⟨fun {c} hc ↦ ?_⟩⟩⟩, fun _ _ π _ c hc ↦ ⟨?_⟩⟩
· exact ⟨isLimitOfReflects s (isLimitOfPreserves (F ⋙ s) hc)⟩
| · exact isLimitOfIsLimitForkMap s _ (hF₂ π c hc).some
lemma isSheaf_coherent_of_projective_comp [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[∀ (X : C), Projective X] [PreservesFiniteProducts s]
(hF : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F) : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) (F ⋙ s) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_of_projective] at hF ⊢
infer_instance
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/SheafComparison.lean | 287 | 294 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
| rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 442 | 458 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
/-!
# Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces.
Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
open Filter Function Set Uniformity Topology
section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β}
/-!
### Uniform inducing maps
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is called *uniform inducing* if the uniformity filter
on `α` is the pullback of the uniformity filter on `β` under `Prod.map f f`. If `α` is a separated
space, then this implies that `f` is injective, hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformInducing (f : α → β) : Prop where
/-- The uniformity filter on the domain is the pullback of the uniformity filter on the codomain
under `Prod.map f f`. -/
comap_uniformity : comap (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α
lemma isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f = ‹UniformSpace α› := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformSpace.ext_iff, Filter.ext_iff]
rfl
protected alias ⟨IsUniformInducing.comap_uniformSpace, _⟩ := isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace
lemma isUniformInducing_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformContinuous, tendsto_iff_comap, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]; rfl
protected lemma Filter.HasBasis.isUniformInducing_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp [isUniformInducing_iff', h.uniformContinuous_iff h', (h'.comap _).le_basis_iff h, subset_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.mk' {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, Filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.id : IsUniformInducing (@id α) :=
⟨by rw [← Prod.map_def, Prod.map_id, comap_id]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨by rw [← hf.1, ← hg.1, comap_comap]; rfl⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hg.comp⟩
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, ← h.comap_uniformity,
Function.comp_def, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.basis_uniformity {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {ι : Sort*}
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (H : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => Prod.map f f ⁻¹' s i :=
hf.1 ▸ H.comap _
theorem IsUniformInducing.cauchy_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {F : Filter α} :
Cauchy (map f F) ↔ Cauchy F := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap, ← hf.comap_uniformity]
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hgf : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f)) : IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ hf.le_comap⟩
rw [← hgf.1, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_comp_map f f g g, ← comap_comap]
exact comap_mono hg.le_comap
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
UniformContinuous f := (isUniformInducing_iff'.1 hf).1
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuous f ↔ UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuous, Tendsto]
simp only [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def]
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformInducing_comp_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
simp only [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {S : Set α}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (g ∘ f) S := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuousOn, Tendsto]
rw [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, comp_def, comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.isInducing {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) : IsInducing f := by
obtain rfl := h.comap_uniformSpace
exact .induced f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsUniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias UniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
theorem IsUniformInducing.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace α'] [UniformSpace β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : IsUniformInducing e₁) (h₂ : IsUniformInducing e₂) :
IsUniformInducing fun p : α × β => (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) :=
⟨by simp [Function.comp_def, uniformity_prod, ← h₁.1, ← h₂.1, comap_inf, comap_comap]⟩
lemma IsUniformInducing.isDenseInducing (h : IsUniformInducing f) (hd : DenseRange f) :
IsDenseInducing f where
toIsInducing := h.isInducing
dense := hd
lemma SeparationQuotient.isUniformInducing_mk :
IsUniformInducing (mk : α → SeparationQuotient α) :=
⟨comap_mk_uniformity⟩
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.injective [T0Space α] {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) :
Injective f :=
h.isInducing.injective
/-!
### Uniform embeddings
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is a *uniform embedding* if it is uniform inducing and
injective. If `α` is a separated space, then the latter assumption follows from the former. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformEmbedding (f : α → β) : Prop extends IsUniformInducing f where
/-- A uniform embedding is injective. -/
injective : Function.Injective f
lemma IsUniformEmbedding.isUniformInducing (hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformInducing f :=
hf.toIsUniformInducing
theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, isUniformInducing_iff']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, h.isUniformInducing_iff h']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp only [h.isUniformEmbedding_iff' h', h.uniformContinuous_iff h']
theorem isUniformEmbedding_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} :
| IsUniformEmbedding (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) :=
{ comap_uniformity := rfl
injective := Subtype.val_injective }
theorem isUniformEmbedding_set_inclusion {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformEmbedding.lean | 166 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
| rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 165 | 168 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
theorem degrees_add_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem degrees_sum_le {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
theorem degrees_mul_le {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
theorem degrees_prod_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
theorem degrees_pow_le {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod_le (s := .range n) (f := fun _ ↦ p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_add := degrees_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sum := degrees_sum_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_mul := degrees_mul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_prod := degrees_prod_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_pow := degrees_pow_le
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
theorem le_degrees_add_left (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias le_degrees_add := le_degrees_add_left
lemma le_degrees_add_right (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : q.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
simpa [add_comm] using le_degrees_add_left h.symm
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) :
(p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees :=
degrees_add_le.antisymm <| Multiset.union_le (le_degrees_add_left h) (le_degrees_add_right h)
lemma degrees_map_le [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S} : (map f p).degrees ≤ p.degrees := by
classical exact Finset.sup_mono <| support_map_subset ..
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_map := degrees_map_le
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).degrees ⊆ φ.degrees.map f := by
classical
intro i
rw [mem_degrees, Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩ := coeff_rename_ne_zero _ _ _ hd
simp only [Finsupp.mapDomain, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [sum_apply, Finsupp.sum] at hi
contrapose! hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro j hj
simp only [exists_prop, mem_degrees] at hi
specialize hi j ⟨x, hx, hj⟩
rw [Finsupp.single_apply, if_neg hi]
theorem degrees_map_of_injective [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Injective f) : (map f p).degrees = p.degrees := by
simp only [degrees, MvPolynomial.support_map_of_injective _ hf]
theorem degrees_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f) :
degrees (rename f p) = (degrees p).map f := by
classical
simp only [degrees, Multiset.map_finset_sup p.support Finsupp.toMultiset f h,
support_rename_of_injective h, Finset.sup_image]
refine Finset.sup_congr rfl fun x _ => ?_
exact (Finsupp.toMultiset_map _ _).symm
end Degrees
section DegreeOf
/-! ### `degreeOf` -/
/-- `degreeOf n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degreeOf (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.count n
theorem degreeOf_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degreeOf n = p.degrees.count n := by rw [degreeOf]; convert rfl
theorem degreeOf_eq_sup (n : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n f = f.support.sup fun m => m n := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_def, degrees, Multiset.count_finset_sup]
congr
ext
simp only [count_toMultiset]
theorem degreeOf_lt_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} (h : 0 < d) :
degreeOf n f < d ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → m n < d := by
rwa [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
lemma degreeOf_le_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} :
degreeOf n f ≤ d ↔ ∀ m ∈ support f, m n ≤ d := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_zero (n : σ) : degreeOf n (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp only [degreeOf_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.count_zero]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_C (a : R) (x : σ) : degreeOf x (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp [degreeOf_def, degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) [Nontrivial R] :
degreeOf i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
classical
by_cases c : i = j
· simp only [c, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, degreeOf_def, degrees_X, Multiset.count_singleton]
simp [c, if_false, degreeOf_def, degrees_X]
theorem degreeOf_add_le (n : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n (f + g) ≤ max (degreeOf n f) (degreeOf n g) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem monomial_le_degreeOf (i : σ) {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} (h_m : m ∈ f.support) :
m i ≤ degreeOf i f := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup i]
apply Finset.le_sup h_m
lemma degreeOf_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (i : σ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(monomial s a).degreeOf i = s i := by
classical rw [degreeOf_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ ha, Finsupp.count_toMultiset]
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_mul_le (i : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (f * g) ≤ degreeOf i f + degreeOf i g := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
rw [Multiset.count_add]
theorem degreeOf_sum_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∑ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ s.sup fun j => degreeOf i (f j) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_sum_le
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_prod_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∏ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ ∑ j ∈ s, (f j).degreeOf i := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_prod_le (by simp only [coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply])
(fun _ _ => by simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply])
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_pow_le (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :
degreeOf i (p ^ n) ≤ n * degreeOf i p := by
simpa using degreeOf_prod_le i (Finset.range n) (fun _ => p)
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_of_ne {i j : σ} (f : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : i ≠ j) :
degreeOf i (f * X j) = degreeOf i f := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf_eq_sup i, support_mul_X, Finset.sup_map]
congr
ext
simp only [Finsupp.single, add_eq_left, addRightEmbedding_apply, coe_mk,
Pi.add_apply, comp_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.single_eq_of_ne h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")] alias degreeOf_mul_X_ne := degreeOf_mul_X_of_ne
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_self (j : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf j (f * X j) ≤ degreeOf j f + 1 := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf]
apply (Multiset.count_le_of_le j degrees_mul_le).trans
simp only [Multiset.count_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le j <| degrees_X' j
rw [Multiset.count_singleton_self]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")] alias degreeOf_mul_X_eq := degreeOf_mul_X_self
theorem degreeOf_mul_X_eq_degreeOf_add_one_iff (j : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf j (f * X j) = degreeOf j f + 1 ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => by by_contra ha; simp [ha] at h, fun h => ?_⟩
apply Nat.le_antisymm (degreeOf_mul_X_self j f)
have : (f.support.sup fun m ↦ m j) + 1 = (f.support.sup fun m ↦ (m j + 1)) :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_nonempty @Nat.succ_le_succ (support_nonempty.mpr h)
simp only [degreeOf_eq_sup, support_mul_X, this]
apply Finset.sup_le
intro x hx
simp only [Finset.sup_map, bot_eq_zero', add_pos_iff, zero_lt_one, or_true, Finset.le_sup_iff]
use x
simpa using mem_support_iff.mp hx
theorem degreeOf_C_mul_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(C c * p).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
simp only [degrees_C, zero_add]
theorem degreeOf_mul_C_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) (c : R) :
(p * C c).degreeOf i ≤ p.degreeOf i := by
unfold degreeOf
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
simp only [degrees_C, add_zero]
| theorem degreeOf_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f)
(i : σ) : degreeOf (f i) (rename f p) = degreeOf i p := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf, degrees_rename_of_injective h, Multiset.count_map_eq_count' f p.degrees h]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 334 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.LocallyCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.LocallyFinite
/-!
# Sigma-compactness in topological spaces
## Main definitions
* `IsSigmaCompact`: a set that is the union of countably many compact sets.
* `SigmaCompactSpace X`: `X` is a σ-compact topological space; i.e., is the union
of a countable collection of compact subspaces.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
/-- A subset `s ⊆ X` is called **σ-compact** if it is the union of countably many compact sets. -/
def IsSigmaCompact (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ K : ℕ → Set X, (∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) ∧ ⋃ n, K n = s
/-- Compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma IsCompact.isSigmaCompact {s : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) : IsSigmaCompact s :=
⟨fun _ => s, fun _ => hs, iUnion_const _⟩
/-- The empty set is σ-compact. -/
@[simp]
lemma isSigmaCompact_empty : IsSigmaCompact (∅ : Set X) :=
IsCompact.isSigmaCompact isCompact_empty
/-- Countable unions of compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_iUnion_of_isCompact [hι : Countable ι] (s : ι → Set X)
(hcomp : ∀ i, IsCompact (s i)) : IsSigmaCompact (⋃ i, s i) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iUnion_of_empty, isSigmaCompact_empty]
· -- If ι is non-empty, choose a surjection f : ℕ → ι, this yields a map ℕ → Set X.
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := countable_iff_exists_surjective.mp hι
exact ⟨s ∘ f, fun n ↦ hcomp (f n), Function.Surjective.iUnion_comp hf _⟩
/-- Countable unions of compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_sUnion_of_isCompact {S : Set (Set X)} (hc : Set.Countable S)
(hcomp : ∀ (s : Set X), s ∈ S → IsCompact s) : IsSigmaCompact (⋃₀ S) := by
have : Countable S := countable_coe_iff.mpr hc
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply isSigmaCompact_iUnion_of_isCompact _ (fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ hcomp s hs)
/-- Countable unions of σ-compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_iUnion [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set X)
(hcomp : ∀ i, IsSigmaCompact (s i)) : IsSigmaCompact (⋃ i, s i) := by
-- Choose a decomposition s_i = ⋃ K_i,j for each i.
choose K hcomp hcov using fun i ↦ hcomp i
-- Then, we have a countable union of countable unions of compact sets, i.e. countably many.
have := calc
⋃ i, s i
_ = ⋃ i, ⋃ n, (K i n) := by simp_rw [hcov]
_ = ⋃ (i) (n : ℕ), (K.uncurry ⟨i, n⟩) := by rw [Function.uncurry_def]
_ = ⋃ x, K.uncurry x := by rw [← iUnion_prod']
rw [this]
exact isSigmaCompact_iUnion_of_isCompact K.uncurry fun x ↦ (hcomp x.1 x.2)
/-- Countable unions of σ-compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_sUnion (S : Set (Set X)) (hc : Set.Countable S)
(hcomp : ∀ s : S, IsSigmaCompact s (X := X)) : IsSigmaCompact (⋃₀ S) := by
have : Countable S := countable_coe_iff.mpr hc
apply sUnion_eq_iUnion.symm ▸ isSigmaCompact_iUnion _ hcomp
/-- Countable unions of σ-compact sets are σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_biUnion {s : Set ι} {S : ι → Set X} (hc : Set.Countable s)
(hcomp : ∀ (i : ι), i ∈ s → IsSigmaCompact (S i)) :
IsSigmaCompact (⋃ (i : ι) (_ : i ∈ s), S i) := by
have : Countable ↑s := countable_coe_iff.mpr hc
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact isSigmaCompact_iUnion _ (fun ⟨i', hi'⟩ ↦ hcomp i' hi')
/-- A closed subset of a σ-compact set is σ-compact. -/
lemma IsSigmaCompact.of_isClosed_subset {s t : Set X} (ht : IsSigmaCompact t)
(hs : IsClosed s) (h : s ⊆ t) : IsSigmaCompact s := by
rcases ht with ⟨K, hcompact, hcov⟩
refine ⟨(fun n ↦ s ∩ (K n)), fun n ↦ (hcompact n).inter_left hs, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_iUnion, hcov]
exact inter_eq_left.mpr h
/-- If `s` is σ-compact and `f` is continuous on `s`, `f(s)` is σ-compact. -/
lemma IsSigmaCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} (hs : IsSigmaCompact s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsSigmaCompact (f '' s) := by
rcases hs with ⟨K, hcompact, hcov⟩
refine ⟨fun n ↦ f '' K n, ?_, hcov.symm ▸ image_iUnion.symm⟩
exact fun n ↦ (hcompact n).image_of_continuousOn (hf.mono (hcov.symm ▸ subset_iUnion K n))
/-- If `s` is σ-compact and `f` continuous, `f(s)` is σ-compact. -/
lemma IsSigmaCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsSigmaCompact s) :
IsSigmaCompact (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is σ-compact
if and only `s` is σ-compact. -/
lemma Topology.IsInducing.isSigmaCompact_iff {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsSigmaCompact s ↔ IsSigmaCompact (f '' s) := by
constructor
· exact fun h ↦ h.image hf.continuous
· rintro ⟨L, hcomp, hcov⟩
-- Suppose f(s) is σ-compact; we want to show s is σ-compact.
-- Write f(s) as a union of compact sets L n, so s = ⋃ K n with K n := f⁻¹(L n) ∩ s.
-- Since f is inducing, each K n is compact iff L n is.
refine ⟨fun n ↦ f ⁻¹' (L n) ∩ s, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : f '' (f ⁻¹' (L n) ∩ s) = L n := by
rw [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left.mpr]
exact (subset_iUnion _ n).trans hcov.le
apply hf.isCompact_iff.mpr (this.symm ▸ (hcomp n))
· calc ⋃ n, f ⁻¹' L n ∩ s
_ = f ⁻¹' (⋃ n, L n) ∩ s := by rw [preimage_iUnion, iUnion_inter]
_ = f ⁻¹' (f '' s) ∩ s := by rw [hcov]
_ = s := inter_eq_right.mpr (subset_preimage_image _ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isSigmaCompact_iff := IsInducing.isSigmaCompact_iff
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an embedding, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is σ-compact
if and only `s` is σ-compact. -/
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.isSigmaCompact_iff {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) : IsSigmaCompact s ↔ IsSigmaCompact (f '' s) :=
hf.isInducing.isSigmaCompact_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.isSigmaCompact_iff := IsEmbedding.isSigmaCompact_iff
/-- Sets of subtype are σ-compact iff the image under a coercion is. -/
lemma Subtype.isSigmaCompact_iff {p : X → Prop} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
IsSigmaCompact s ↔ IsSigmaCompact ((↑) '' s : Set X) :=
IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.isSigmaCompact_iff
/-- A σ-compact space is a space that is the union of a countable collection of compact subspaces.
Note that a locally compact separable T₂ space need not be σ-compact.
The sequence can be extracted using `compactCovering`. -/
class SigmaCompactSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a σ-compact space, `Set.univ` is a σ-compact set. -/
isSigmaCompact_univ : IsSigmaCompact (univ : Set X)
/-- A topological space is σ-compact iff `univ` is σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_univ_iff : IsSigmaCompact (univ : Set X) ↔ SigmaCompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
/-- In a σ-compact space, `univ` is σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_univ [h : SigmaCompactSpace X] : IsSigmaCompact (univ : Set X) :=
isSigmaCompact_univ_iff.mpr h
/-- A topological space is σ-compact iff there exists a countable collection of compact
subspaces that cover the entire space. -/
lemma SigmaCompactSpace_iff_exists_compact_covering :
SigmaCompactSpace X ↔ ∃ K : ℕ → Set X, (∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) ∧ ⋃ n, K n = univ := by
rw [← isSigmaCompact_univ_iff, IsSigmaCompact]
lemma SigmaCompactSpace.exists_compact_covering [h : SigmaCompactSpace X] :
∃ K : ℕ → Set X, (∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) ∧ ⋃ n, K n = univ :=
SigmaCompactSpace_iff_exists_compact_covering.mp h
/-- If `X` is σ-compact, `im f` is σ-compact. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_range {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) [SigmaCompactSpace X] :
IsSigmaCompact (range f) :=
image_univ ▸ isSigmaCompact_univ.image hf
/-- A subset `s` is σ-compact iff `s` (with the subspace topology) is a σ-compact space. -/
lemma isSigmaCompact_iff_isSigmaCompact_univ {s : Set X} :
IsSigmaCompact s ↔ IsSigmaCompact (univ : Set s) := by
rw [Subtype.isSigmaCompact_iff, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
lemma isSigmaCompact_iff_sigmaCompactSpace {s : Set X} :
IsSigmaCompact s ↔ SigmaCompactSpace s :=
isSigmaCompact_iff_isSigmaCompact_univ.trans isSigmaCompact_univ_iff
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) CompactSpace.sigmaCompact [CompactSpace X] : SigmaCompactSpace X :=
⟨⟨fun _ => univ, fun _ => isCompact_univ, iUnion_const _⟩⟩
-- The `alias` command creates a definition, triggering the defLemma linter.
@[nolint defLemma, deprecated (since := "2024-11-13")] alias
CompactSpace.sigma_compact := CompactSpace.sigmaCompact
theorem SigmaCompactSpace.of_countable (S : Set (Set X)) (Hc : S.Countable)
(Hcomp : ∀ s ∈ S, IsCompact s) (HU : ⋃₀ S = univ) : SigmaCompactSpace X :=
⟨(exists_seq_cover_iff_countable ⟨_, isCompact_empty⟩).2 ⟨S, Hc, Hcomp, HU⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) sigmaCompactSpace_of_locallyCompact_secondCountable
[LocallyCompactSpace X] [SecondCountableTopology X] : SigmaCompactSpace X := by
choose K hKc hxK using fun x : X => exists_compact_mem_nhds x
rcases countable_cover_nhds hxK with ⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩
refine SigmaCompactSpace.of_countable _ (hsc.image K) (forall_mem_image.2 fun x _ => hKc x) ?_
rwa [sUnion_image]
-- The `alias` command creates a definition, triggering the defLemma linter.
@[nolint defLemma, deprecated (since := "2024-11-13")]
alias sigmaCompactSpace_of_locally_compact_second_countable :=
sigmaCompactSpace_of_locallyCompact_secondCountable
section
variable (X)
variable [SigmaCompactSpace X]
open SigmaCompactSpace
/-- A choice of compact covering for a `σ`-compact space, chosen to be monotone. -/
def compactCovering : ℕ → Set X :=
Accumulate exists_compact_covering.choose
theorem isCompact_compactCovering (n : ℕ) : IsCompact (compactCovering X n) :=
isCompact_accumulate (Classical.choose_spec SigmaCompactSpace.exists_compact_covering).1 n
theorem iUnion_compactCovering : ⋃ n, compactCovering X n = univ := by
rw [compactCovering, iUnion_accumulate]
exact (Classical.choose_spec SigmaCompactSpace.exists_compact_covering).2
theorem iUnion_closure_compactCovering : ⋃ n, closure (compactCovering X n) = univ :=
eq_top_mono (iUnion_mono fun _ ↦ subset_closure) (iUnion_compactCovering X)
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem compactCovering_subset ⦃m n : ℕ⦄ (h : m ≤ n) : compactCovering X m ⊆ compactCovering X n :=
monotone_accumulate h
variable {X}
theorem exists_mem_compactCovering (x : X) : ∃ n, x ∈ compactCovering X n :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.mp (iUnion_compactCovering X) x
instance [SigmaCompactSpace Y] : SigmaCompactSpace (X × Y) :=
⟨⟨fun n => compactCovering X n ×ˢ compactCovering Y n, fun _ =>
(isCompact_compactCovering _ _).prod (isCompact_compactCovering _ _), by
simp only [iUnion_prod_of_monotone (compactCovering_subset X) (compactCovering_subset Y),
iUnion_compactCovering, univ_prod_univ]⟩⟩
instance [Finite ι] {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SigmaCompactSpace (X i)] :
SigmaCompactSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun n => Set.pi univ fun i => compactCovering (X i) n,
fun n => isCompact_univ_pi fun i => isCompact_compactCovering (X i) _, ?_⟩⟩
rw [iUnion_univ_pi_of_monotone]
· simp only [iUnion_compactCovering, pi_univ]
· exact fun i => compactCovering_subset (X i)
instance [SigmaCompactSpace Y] : SigmaCompactSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨⟨fun n => Sum.inl '' compactCovering X n ∪ Sum.inr '' compactCovering Y n, fun n =>
((isCompact_compactCovering X n).image continuous_inl).union
((isCompact_compactCovering Y n).image continuous_inr),
by simp only [iUnion_union_distrib, ← image_iUnion, iUnion_compactCovering, image_univ,
range_inl_union_range_inr]⟩⟩
instance [Countable ι] {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, SigmaCompactSpace (X i)] : SigmaCompactSpace (Σi, X i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· infer_instance
· rcases exists_surjective_nat ι with ⟨f, hf⟩
refine ⟨⟨fun n => ⋃ k ≤ n, Sigma.mk (f k) '' compactCovering (X (f k)) n, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (finite_le_nat _).isCompact_biUnion fun k _ => ?_
exact (isCompact_compactCovering _ _).image continuous_sigmaMk
· simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, Sigma.forall, mem_iUnion, hf.forall]
intro k y
rcases exists_mem_compactCovering y with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨max k n, k, le_max_left _ _, mem_image_of_mem _ ?_⟩
exact compactCovering_subset _ (le_max_right _ _) hn
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaCompactSpace {e : Y → X}
| (he : IsClosedEmbedding e) : SigmaCompactSpace Y :=
⟨⟨fun n => e ⁻¹' compactCovering X n, fun _ =>
he.isCompact_preimage (isCompact_compactCovering _ _), by
rw [← preimage_iUnion, iUnion_compactCovering, preimage_univ]⟩⟩
theorem IsClosed.sigmaCompactSpace {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) : SigmaCompactSpace s :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.sigmaCompactSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/SigmaCompact.lean | 271 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.SmoothSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.PoissonSummation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
/-!
# The two-variable Jacobi theta function
This file defines the two-variable Jacobi theta function
$$\theta(z, \tau) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \exp (2 i \pi n z + i \pi n ^ 2 \tau),$$
and proves the functional equation relating the values at `(z, τ)` and `(z / τ, -1 / τ)`,
using Poisson's summation formula. We also show holomorphy (jointly in both variables).
Additionally, we show some analogous results about the derivative (in the `z`-variable)
$$\theta'(z, τ) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} 2 \pi i n \exp (2 i \pi n z + i \pi n ^ 2 \tau).$$
(Note that the Mellin transform of `θ` will give us functional equations for `L`-functions
of even Dirichlet characters, and that of `θ'` will do the same for odd Dirichlet characters.)
-/
open Complex Real Asymptotics Filter Topology
open scoped ComplexConjugate
noncomputable section
section term_defs
/-!
## Definitions of the summands
-/
/-- Summand in the series for the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ := cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)
/-- Summand in the series for the Fréchet derivative of the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ × ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ :=
cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ) •
((2 * π * I * n) • (ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ) +
(π * I * n ^ 2) • (ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ))
lemma hasFDerivAt_jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
HasFDerivAt (fun p : ℂ × ℂ ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term n p.1 p.2)
(jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (z, τ) := by
let f : ℂ × ℂ → ℂ := fun p ↦ 2 * π * I * n * p.1 + π * I * n ^ 2 * p.2
suffices HasFDerivAt f ((2 * π * I * n) • (ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ)
+ (π * I * n ^ 2) • (ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ)) (z, τ) from this.cexp
exact (hasFDerivAt_fst.const_mul _).add (hasFDerivAt_snd.const_mul _)
/-- Summand in the series for the `z`-derivative of the Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) := 2 * π * I * n * jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ
end term_defs
section term_bounds
/-!
## Bounds for the summands
We show that the sums of the three functions `jacobiTheta₂_term`, `jacobiTheta₂'_term` and
`jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv` are locally uniformly convergent in the domain `0 < im τ`, and diverge
everywhere else.
-/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ = rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * τ.im - 2 * π * n * z.im) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, Complex.norm_exp, (by push_cast; ring :
(2 * π : ℂ) * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ = (π * (2 * n):) * z * I + (π * n ^ 2 :) * τ * I),
add_re, mul_I_re, im_ofReal_mul, mul_I_re, im_ofReal_mul]
ring_nf
/-- A uniform upper bound for `jacobiTheta₂_term` on compact subsets. -/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le {S T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) {z τ : ℂ}
(hz : |im z| ≤ S) (hτ : T ≤ im τ) (n : ℤ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ rexp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|)) := by
simp_rw [norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, Real.exp_le_exp, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, ← neg_add,
neg_le_neg_iff, mul_comm (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc π, ← mul_add, mul_le_mul_left pi_pos,
mul_comm T, mul_comm S]
refine add_le_add (mul_le_mul le_rfl hτ hT.le (sq_nonneg _)) ?_
rw [← mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left two_pos, mul_comm, neg_mul, ← mul_neg]
refine le_trans ?_ (neg_abs_le _)
rw [mul_neg, neg_le_neg_iff, abs_mul, Int.cast_abs]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hz (abs_nonneg _)
/-- A uniform upper bound for `jacobiTheta₂'_term` on compact subsets. -/
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂'_term_le {S T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) {z τ : ℂ}
(hz : |im z| ≤ S) (hτ : T ≤ im τ) (n : ℤ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ‖ ≤ 2 * π * |n| * rexp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|)) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul]
refine mul_le_mul (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hT hz hτ n)
(norm_nonneg _) (by positivity)
simp only [norm_mul, Complex.norm_two, norm_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
norm_intCast, mul_one, Int.cast_abs]
/-- The uniform bound we have given is summable, and remains so after multiplying by any fixed
power of `|n|` (we shall need this for `k = 0, 1, 2`). -/
lemma summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound (S : ℝ) {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (k : ℕ) :
Summable (fun n : ℤ ↦ (|n| ^ k : ℝ) * Real.exp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * |n|))) := by
suffices Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n ^ k : ℝ) * Real.exp (-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * n))) by
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg <;>
simpa only [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, abs_neg, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
apply summable_of_isBigO_nat (summable_pow_mul_exp_neg_nat_mul k zero_lt_one)
apply IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
refine Real.isBigO_exp_comp_exp_comp.mpr (Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot ?_)
simp_rw [← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, Pi.sub_apply]
conv =>
enter [1, n]
rw [show -(-π * (T * n ^ 2 - 2 * S * n) - -1 * n) = n * (π * T * n - (2 * π * S + 1)) by ring]
refine tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ (tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ ?_)
exact tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.const_mul_atTop (mul_pos pi_pos hT)
/-- The series defining the theta function is summable if and only if `0 < im τ`. -/
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z τ : ℂ) : Summable (jacobiTheta₂_term · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
-- NB. This is a statement of no great mathematical interest; it is included largely to avoid
-- having to impose `0 < im τ` as a hypothesis on many later lemmas.
refine Iff.symm ⟨fun hτ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩ -- do quicker implication first!
· refine (summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound |im z| hτ 0).of_norm_bounded _ ?_
simpa only [pow_zero, one_mul] using norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl
· by_contra! hτ
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hτ with hτ | hτ
· -- easy case `im τ < 0`
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term ↑n z τ‖) atTop atTop by
replace h := (h.comp_injective (fun a b ↦ Int.ofNat_inj.mp)).tendsto_atTop_zero.norm
exact atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop _) this)
simp only [norm_zero, Function.comp_def, norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, Int.cast_natCast]
conv =>
enter [1, n]
rw [show -π * n ^ 2 * τ.im - 2 * π * n * z.im =
n * (n * (-π * τ.im) - 2 * π * z.im) by ring]
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ ?_)
exact tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_const
(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.mpr pi_pos) hτ))
· -- case im τ = 0: 3-way split according to `im z`
simp_rw [← summable_norm_iff (E := ℂ), norm_jacobiTheta₂_term, hτ, mul_zero, zero_sub] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy (im z) 0 with hz | hz | hz
· replace h := (h.comp_injective (fun a b ↦ Int.ofNat_inj.mp)).tendsto_atTop_zero
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, Int.cast_natCast] at h
refine atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop 0) ?_)
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp ?_
simp only [tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, mul_assoc]
apply Filter.Tendsto.const_mul_atBot two_pos
exact (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.atTop_mul_const_of_neg hz).const_mul_atBot pi_pos
· revert h
simpa only [hz, mul_zero, neg_zero, Real.exp_zero, summable_const_iff] using one_ne_zero
· have : ((-↑·) : ℕ → ℤ).Injective := fun _ _ ↦ by simp only [neg_inj, Nat.cast_inj, imp_self]
replace h := (h.comp_injective this).tendsto_atTop_zero
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, mul_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg] at h
refine atTop_neBot.ne (disjoint_self.mp <| h.disjoint (disjoint_nhds_atTop 0) ?_)
exact tendsto_exp_atTop.comp ((tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop.const_mul_atTop
(mul_pos two_pos pi_pos)).atTop_mul_const hz)
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_le (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ ≤ 3 * π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ := by
-- this is slow to elaborate so do it once and reuse:
have hns (a : ℂ) (f : (ℂ × ℂ) →L[ℂ] ℂ) : ‖a • f‖ = ‖a‖ * ‖f‖ := norm_smul a f
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv, jacobiTheta₂_term, hns,
mul_comm _ ‖cexp _‖, (by norm_num : (3 : ℝ) = 2 + 1), add_mul, add_mul]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add ?_ ?_)) (norm_nonneg _)
· simp_rw [hns, norm_mul, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_intCast,
norm_real, norm_of_nonneg zero_le_two, Real.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, norm_I, mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs, mul_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ pi_pos.le) two_pos.le
refine le_trans ?_ (?_ : |(n : ℝ)| ≤ |(n : ℝ)| ^ 2)
· exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (abs_nonneg _) (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_fst_le ..)
· exact_mod_cast Int.le_self_sq |n|
· simp_rw [hns, norm_mul, one_mul, norm_I, mul_one,
norm_real, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, ← ofReal_intCast, ← ofReal_pow, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs, abs_pow]
apply mul_le_of_le_one_right (mul_nonneg pi_pos.le (pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) _))
exact ContinuousLinearMap.norm_snd_le ..
lemma norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_ge (n : ℤ) (z τ : ℂ) :
π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ := by
have : ‖(jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (0, 1)‖ ≤ ‖jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ‖ := by
refine (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Prod.norm_def, norm_one, norm_zero, max_eq_right zero_le_one, mul_one, le_refl]
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp_rw [jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv, jacobiTheta₂_term, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
Pi.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_fst', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_snd', Pi.smul_apply, smul_zero, zero_add,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, mul_comm _ ‖cexp _‖, norm_mul]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_nonneg _)
simp_rw [norm_real, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le, norm_I, mul_one,
Int.cast_abs, ← norm_intCast, norm_pow]
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff (z τ : ℂ) :
Summable (jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
constructor
· rw [← summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z := z)]
intro h
have := h.norm
refine this.of_norm_bounded_eventually _ ?_
have : ∀ᶠ (n : ℤ) in cofinite, n ≠ 0 :=
Int.cofinite_eq ▸ (mem_sup.mpr ⟨eventually_ne_atBot 0, eventually_ne_atTop 0⟩)
filter_upwards [this] with n hn
refine le_trans ?_ (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_ge n z τ)
apply le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
refine one_le_pi_div_two.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ pi_pos.le)
refine (by norm_num : 2⁻¹ ≤ (1 : ℝ)).trans ?_
rw [one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs, ← Int.cast_abs, abs_abs, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs hn
· intro hτ
refine ((summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound
|z.im| hτ 2).mul_left (3 * π)).of_norm_bounded _ (fun n ↦ ?_)
refine (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_le n z τ).trans
(?_ : 3 * π * |n| ^ 2 * ‖jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ‖ ≤ _)
simp_rw [mul_assoc (3 * π)]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (mul_pos (by norm_num : 0 < (3 : ℝ)) pi_pos).le
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (pow_nonneg (Int.cast_nonneg.mpr (abs_nonneg _)) _)
exact norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl n
lemma summable_jacobiTheta₂'_term_iff (z τ : ℂ) :
Summable (jacobiTheta₂'_term · z τ) ↔ 0 < im τ := by
constructor
· rw [← summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff (z := z)]
refine fun h ↦ (h.norm.mul_left (2 * π)⁻¹).of_norm_bounded_eventually _ ?_
have : ∀ᶠ (n : ℤ) in cofinite, n ≠ 0 :=
Int.cofinite_eq ▸ (mem_sup.mpr ⟨eventually_ne_atBot 0, eventually_ne_atTop 0⟩)
filter_upwards [this] with n hn
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul, ← mul_assoc]
refine le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _) ?_
simp_rw [norm_mul, norm_I, norm_real, mul_one, norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
← ofReal_ofNat, norm_real, norm_of_nonneg two_pos.le, ← ofReal_intCast, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, ← Int.cast_abs, ← mul_assoc _ (2 * π),
inv_mul_cancel₀ (mul_pos two_pos pi_pos).ne', one_mul]
rw [← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs hn
· refine fun hτ ↦ ((summable_pow_mul_jacobiTheta₂_term_bound
|z.im| hτ 1).mul_left (2 * π)).of_norm_bounded _ (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, norm_mul, ← mul_assoc, pow_one]
refine mul_le_mul (le_of_eq ?_) (norm_jacobiTheta₂_term_le hτ le_rfl le_rfl n)
(norm_nonneg _) (by positivity)
simp_rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_two, norm_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
norm_intCast, mul_one, Int.cast_abs]
end term_bounds
/-!
## Definitions of the functions
-/
/-- The two-variable Jacobi theta function,
`θ z τ = ∑' (n : ℤ), cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)`.
-/
def jacobiTheta₂ (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ
/-- Fréchet derivative of the two-variable Jacobi theta function. -/
def jacobiTheta₂_fderiv (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ × ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ
/-- The `z`-derivative of the Jacobi theta function,
`θ' z τ = ∑' (n : ℤ), 2 * π * I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * n * z + π * I * n ^ 2 * τ)`.
-/
def jacobiTheta₂' (z τ : ℂ) := ∑' n : ℤ, jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂ z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂_fderiv z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : 0 < im τ) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ jacobiTheta₂'_term n z τ) (jacobiTheta₂' z τ) :=
((summable_jacobiTheta₂'_term_iff z τ).mpr hτ).hasSum
lemma jacobiTheta₂_undef (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : im τ ≤ 0) : jacobiTheta₂ z τ = 0 := by
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable
rw [summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_iff]
exact not_lt.mpr hτ
|
lemma jacobiTheta₂_fderiv_undef (z : ℂ) {τ : ℂ} (hτ : im τ ≤ 0) : jacobiTheta₂_fderiv z τ = 0 := by
apply tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable
rw [summable_jacobiTheta₂_term_fderiv_iff]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/JacobiTheta/TwoVariable.lean | 277 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
instance (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel (SameCycle f)] :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f⁻¹) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (f.SameCycle x y) (sameCycle_inv).symm
instance (priority := 100) [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (SameCycle (1 : Perm α)) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (x = y) sameCycle_one.symm
end SameCycle
/-!
### `IsCycle`
-/
section IsCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- A cycle is a non identity permutation where any two nonfixed points of the permutation are
related by repeated application of the permutation. -/
def IsCycle (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, f y ≠ y → SameCycle f x y
theorem IsCycle.ne_one (h : IsCycle f) : f ≠ 1 := fun hf => by simp [hf, IsCycle] at h
@[simp]
theorem not_isCycle_one : ¬(1 : Perm α).IsCycle := fun H => H.ne_one rfl
protected theorem IsCycle.sameCycle (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
SameCycle f x y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 hx
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 hy
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
theorem IsCycle.exists_zpow_eq : IsCycle f → f x ≠ x → f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
IsCycle.sameCycle
theorem IsCycle.inv (hf : IsCycle f) : IsCycle f⁻¹ :=
hf.imp fun _ ⟨hx, h⟩ =>
⟨inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hx.symm, fun _ hy => (h <| inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hy.symm).inv⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_inv : IsCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsCycle f :=
⟨fun h => h.inv, IsCycle.inv⟩
theorem IsCycle.conj : IsCycle f → IsCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx, h⟩
refine ⟨g x, by simp [coe_mul, inv_apply_self, hx], fun y hy => ?_⟩
rw [← apply_inv_self g y]
exact (h <| eq_inv_iff_eq.not.2 hy).conj
protected theorem IsCycle.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
IsCycle g → IsCycle (g.extendDomain f) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩
refine ⟨f a, ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· rw [extendDomain_apply_image]
exact Subtype.coe_injective.ne (f.injective.ne ha)
have h : b = f (f.symm ⟨b, of_not_not <| hb ∘ extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _⟩) := by
rw [apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [h] at hb ⊢
simp only [extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_injective.ne_iff, f.injective.ne_iff] at hb
exact (ha' hb).extendDomain
theorem isCycle_iff_sameCycle (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle f ↔ ∀ {y}, SameCycle f x y ↔ f y ≠ y :=
⟨fun hf y =>
⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ hy =>
hx <| by
rw [← zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy i, (f ^ i).injective.eq_iff] at hi
rw [hi, hy],
hf.exists_zpow_eq hx⟩,
fun h => ⟨x, hx, fun _ hy => h.2 hy⟩⟩
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem IsCycle.exists_pow_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx hy
classical exact
⟨(n % orderOf f).toNat, by
{have := n.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt (orderOf_pos f)))
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this, zpow_mod_orderOf]}⟩
end Finite
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem isCycle_swap (hxy : x ≠ y) : IsCycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa [swap_apply_right], fun a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a) =>
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else
⟨1, by
rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs at * <;> tauto⟩⟩
protected theorem IsSwap.isCycle : IsSwap f → IsCycle f := by
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩
exact isCycle_swap hxy
variable [Fintype α]
theorem IsCycle.two_le_card_support (h : IsCycle f) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
two_le_card_support_of_ne_one h.ne_one
/-- The subgroup generated by a cycle is in bijection with its support -/
noncomputable def IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) :
(Subgroup.zpowers σ) ≃ σ.support :=
Equiv.ofBijective
(fun (τ : ↥ ((Subgroup.zpowers σ) : Set (Perm α))) =>
⟨(τ : Perm α) (Classical.choose hσ), by
obtain ⟨τ, n, rfl⟩ := τ
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
exact (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1⟩)
(by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, m, rfl⟩ ⟨b, n, rfl⟩ h
ext y
by_cases hy : σ y = y
· simp_rw [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy]
· obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_comm σ m i, zpow_apply_comm σ n i]
exact congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_support] at hy
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
exact ⟨⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) {n : ℕ} :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport ⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ =
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_symm_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) (n : ℕ) :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ =
⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ :=
| (Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 hσ.zpowersEquivSupport_apply
protected theorem IsCycle.orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) : orderOf f = #f.support := by
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers, ← Fintype.card_coe]
convert Fintype.card_congr (IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport hf)
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 347 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 893 | 896 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.