Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
zero_pow hb0, smul_zero, zero_mul, smul_zero]
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_contra! h'
replace hroot := hroot _ h'
simp only [IsRoot, eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity] at hroot
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Nat.cast_dvd_cast (α := R) <| Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h'
rw [hq, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors] at hnzd
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd.1] at hroot
exact eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t h hroot
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
apply lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot
clear hroot
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
exact Submonoid.one_mem _
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors]
exact ⟨hnzd _ le_rfl n.succ_ne_zero, ih fun m h ↦ hnzd m (h.trans n.le_succ)⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| hm.trans_lt hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hr hnzd⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors' h hr hnzd⟩
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ 1, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h
(by rw [Nat.factorial_one, Nat.cast_one]; exact Submonoid.one_mem _)
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ p.IsRoot t ∧ (derivative p).IsRoot t := by
rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative h]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h 0 (by norm_num), h 1 (by norm_num)⟩, fun ⟨h0, h1⟩ m hm ↦ ?_⟩
obtain (_|_|m) := m
exacts [h0, h1, by omega]
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_gcd
[GCDMonoid R[X]] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ (gcd p (derivative p)).IsRoot t := by
simp_rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot h, ← dvd_iff_isRoot, dvd_gcd_iff]
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root [CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : p.IsRoot t) :
p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· rw [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
exact derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hpt <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt).ne'
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity [CharZero R] (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_cases h : p.IsRoot t
· exact (derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root h).symm.le
· rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_zero h, zero_tsub]
exact zero_le _
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative h hr⟩
/-- A sufficient condition for the set of roots of a nonzero polynomial `f` to be a subset of the
set of roots of `g` is that `f` divides `f.derivative * g`. Over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, this is also a necessary condition.
See `isRoot_of_isRoot_iff_dvd_derivative_mul` -/
theorem isRoot_of_isRoot_of_dvd_derivative_mul [CharZero R] {f g : R[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0)
(hfd : f ∣ f.derivative * g) {a : R} (haf : f.IsRoot a) : g.IsRoot a := by
rcases hfd with ⟨r, hr⟩
have hdf0 : derivative f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! haf
rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero haf] at hf0 ⊢
exact not_isRoot_C _ _ <| C_ne_zero.mp hf0
by_contra hg
have hdfg0 : f.derivative * g ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hdf0 (by rintro rfl; simp at hg)
have hr' := congr_arg (rootMultiplicity a) hr
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul hdfg0, derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root haf,
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero hg, add_zero, rootMultiplicity_mul (hr ▸ hdfg0), add_comm,
Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos hf0).2 haf))] at hr'
omega
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
instance instNormalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid R[X] where
normUnit p :=
⟨C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff), C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff)⁻¹, by
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1], by rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.inv_mul, C_1]⟩
normUnit_zero := Units.ext (by simp)
normUnit_mul hp0 hq0 :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at *
rw [leadingCoeff_mul, normUnit_mul hp0 hq0, Units.val_mul, C_mul])
normUnit_coe_units u :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [← mul_one u⁻¹, Units.val_mul, Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq]
rcases Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 ⟨u, rfl⟩ with ⟨_, ⟨w, rfl⟩, h2⟩
rw [← h2, leadingCoeff_C, normUnit_coe_units, ← C_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem coe_normUnit {p : R[X]} : (normUnit p : R[X]) = C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff) := by
simp [normUnit]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_normalize (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (normalize p) = normalize (leadingCoeff p) := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem Monic.normalize_eq_self {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : normalize p = p := by
simp only [Polynomial.coe_normUnit, normalize_apply, hp.leadingCoeff, normUnit_one,
Units.val_one, Polynomial.C.map_one, mul_one]
theorem roots_normalize {p : R[X]} : (normalize p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [normalize_apply, mul_comm, coe_normUnit, roots_C_mul _ (normUnit (leadingCoeff p)).ne_zero]
theorem normUnit_X : normUnit (X : Polynomial R) = 1 := by
have := coe_normUnit (R := R) (p := X)
rwa [leadingCoeff_X, normUnit_one, Units.val_one, map_one, Units.val_eq_one] at this
theorem X_eq_normalize : (X : Polynomial R) = normalize X := by
simp only [normalize_apply, normUnit_X, Units.val_one, mul_one]
end NormalizationMonoid
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_pos_of_ne_zero_of_nonunit (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hp : ¬IsUnit p) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hp0 hp
exact hp (IsUnit.map C (IsUnit.mk0 (coeff p 0) (mt C_inj.2 (by simpa using hp0))))
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [Polynomial.ext_iff]
congr!
simp [map_eq_zero, coeff_map, coeff_zero]
theorem map_ne_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
p.degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective
|
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 264 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
| rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 94 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
theorem setToL1_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← (setToL1 hT).map_sub]
exact setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
theorem norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) * ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by
refine
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_extend_le (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) (coeToLp α E ℝ)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) fun x => le_of_eq ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
simp [coeToLp]
_ = ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le hT hC) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hC
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le' hT) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem norm_setToL1_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC)
theorem norm_setToL1_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT)
theorem setToL1_lipschitz (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) (setToL1 hT) :=
(setToL1 hT).lipschitz.weaken (norm_setToL1_le' hT)
/-- If `fs i → f` in `L1`, then `setToL1 hT (fs i) → setToL1 hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) {ι}
(fs : ι → α →₁[μ] E) {l : Filter ι} (hfs : Tendsto fs l (𝓝 f)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToL1 hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToL1 hT f) :=
((setToL1 hT).continuous.tendsto _).comp hfs
end SetToL1
end L1
section Function
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ} {f g : α → E}
variable (μ T)
open Classical in
/-- Extend `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α → E) → F` (for integrable functions `α → E`). We set it to
0 if the function is not integrable. -/
def setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) else 0
variable {μ T}
theorem setToFun_eq (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) :=
dif_pos hf
theorem L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (L1.integrable_coeFn f), Integrable.toL1_coeFn]
theorem setToFun_undef (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
theorem setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_undef hT (not_and_of_not_left _ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias setToFun_non_aEStronglyMeasurable := setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem setToFun_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left' T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (T + T') (hT.add hT') f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left hT hT']
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T'' hT'' f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (fun s => c • T s) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left hT c]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T' hT' f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left' hT hT' c h_smul]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
rw [Pi.zero_def, setToFun_eq hT (integrable_zero _ _ _)]
simp only [← Pi.zero_def]
rw [Integrable.toL1_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero_left {hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C} :
setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left hT _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left' hT h_zero _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (hf.add hg), setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hg, Integrable.toL1_add,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_add]
theorem setToFun_finset_sum' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
classical
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro _
simp only [setToFun_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
rw [setToFun_add hT (hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)) _]
· rw [ih fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
· convert integrable_finset_sum s fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) with x
simp
theorem setToFun_finset_sum (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
convert setToFun_finset_sum' hT s hf with a; simp
theorem setToFun_neg (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT (-f) = -setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hf.neg, Integrable.toL1_neg,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_neg]
· rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT, neg_zero]
rwa [← integrable_neg_iff] at hf
theorem setToFun_sub (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, setToFun_add hT hf hg.neg, setToFun_neg hT g]
theorem setToFun_smul [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT, Integrable.toL1_smul',
L1.setToL1_smul hT h_smul c _]
· by_cases hr : c = 0
· rw [hr]; simp
· have hf' : ¬Integrable (c • f) μ := by rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT hf', smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_congr_ae (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· have hgi : Integrable g μ := hfi.congr h
rw [setToFun_eq hT hfi, setToFun_eq hT hgi, (Integrable.toL1_eq_toL1_iff f g hfi hgi).2 h]
· have hgi : ¬Integrable g μ := by rw [integrable_congr h] at hfi; exact hfi
rw [setToFun_undef hT hfi, setToFun_undef hT hgi]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : μ = 0) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by simp [h, EventuallyEq]
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT this, setToFun_zero]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → μ s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_zero_left' hT fun s hs hμs => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero hs (h s hs hμs)
theorem setToFun_toL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (hf.toL1 f) = setToFun μ T hT f :=
setToFun_congr_ae hT hf.coeFn_toL1
theorem setToFun_indicator_const (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToFun μ T hT (s.indicator fun _ => x) = T s x := by
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ hs hμs x).symm]
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]
exact L1.setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT hs hμs x
theorem setToFun_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun _ => x) = T univ x := by
have : (fun _ : α => x) = Set.indicator univ fun _ => x := (indicator_univ _).symm
rw [this]
exact setToFun_indicator_const hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToFun_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf]; exact L1.setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' hTT' _
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f :=
setToFun_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToFun_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α → G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hfi]
refine L1.setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg ?_
rw [← Lp.coeFn_le]
have h0 := Lp.coeFn_zero G' 1 μ
have h := Integrable.coeFn_toL1 hfi
filter_upwards [h0, h, hf] with _ h0a ha hfa
rw [h0a, ha]
exact hfa
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hfi, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α → G'}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← setToFun_sub hT hg hf]
refine setToFun_nonneg hT hT_nonneg (hfg.mono fun a ha => ?_)
rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ha
end Order
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ T hT f := by
simp_rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]; exact ContinuousLinearMap.continuous _
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `setToFun μ T hT (F i) → setToFun μ T hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (f : α → E)
(hfi : Integrable f μ) {fs : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} (hfsi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (fs i) μ)
(hfs : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖fs i x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
classical
let f_lp := hfi.toL1 f
let F_lp i := if hFi : Integrable (fs i) μ then hFi.toL1 (fs i) else 0
have tendsto_L1 : Tendsto F_lp l (𝓝 f_lp) := by
rw [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm']
simp_rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp hfs
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hi.coeFn_toL1, hfi.coeFn_toL1] with x hxi hxf
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi, hxi, f_lp, hxf]
suffices Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (F_lp i)) l (𝓝 (setToFun μ T hT f)) by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp this
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
suffices h_ae_eq : F_lp i =ᵐ[μ] fs i from setToFun_congr_ae hT h_ae_eq
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi]
exact hi.coeFn_toL1
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT hfi.coeFn_toL1.symm]
exact ((continuous_setToFun hT).tendsto f_lp).comp tendsto_L1
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E} {s : Set E} [SeparableSpace s]
(hfi : Integrable f μ) (hfm : Measurable f) (hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E}
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) (h₀i : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f hfm s y₀ h₀ n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) :=
tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 hT _ hfi
(Eventually.of_forall (SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn hfm hfi h₀ h₀i))
(SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm hfm _ hs (hfi.sub h₀i).2)
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) (s : Set E) [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas s 0 (hs <| by simp) n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
refine tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable hT hf fmeas ?_ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _)
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => subset_closure (hs (Set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `setToFun_congr_measure`: the function sending `f : α →₁[μ] G` to
`f : α →₁[μ'] G` is continuous when `μ' ≤ c' • μ` for `c' ≠ ∞`. -/
theorem continuous_L1_toL1 {μ' : Measure α} (c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f := by
by_cases hc'0 : c' = 0
· have hμ'0 : μ' = 0 := by rw [← Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero']; refine hμ'_le.trans ?_; simp [hc'0]
have h_im_zero :
(fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f) =
0 := by
ext1 f; ext1; simp_rw [hμ'0]; simp only [ae_zero, EventuallyEq, eventually_bot]
rw [h_im_zero]
exact continuous_zero
rw [Metric.continuous_iff]
intro f ε hε_pos
use ε / 2 / c'.toReal
refine ⟨div_pos (half_pos hε_pos) (toReal_pos hc'0 hc'), ?_⟩
intro g hfg
rw [Lp.dist_def] at hfg ⊢
let h_int := fun f' : α →₁[μ] G => (L1.integrable_coeFn f').of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le
have :
eLpNorm (⇑(Integrable.toL1 g (h_int g)) - ⇑(Integrable.toL1 f (h_int f))) 1 μ' =
eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ' :=
eLpNorm_congr_ae ((Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _).sub (Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _))
rw [this]
have h_eLpNorm_ne_top : eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ ≠ ∞ := by
rw [← eLpNorm_congr_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _)]; exact Lp.eLpNorm_ne_top _
calc
(eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ').toReal ≤ (c' * eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ).toReal := by
refine toReal_mono (ENNReal.mul_ne_top hc' h_eLpNorm_ne_top) ?_
refine (eLpNorm_mono_measure (⇑g - ⇑f) hμ'_le).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero hc'0, smul_eq_mul]
simp
_ = c'.toReal * (eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ).toReal := toReal_mul
_ ≤ c'.toReal * (ε / 2 / c'.toReal) := by gcongr
_ = ε / 2 := by
refine mul_div_cancel₀ (ε / 2) ?_; rw [Ne, toReal_eq_zero_iff]; simp [hc', hc'0]
_ < ε := half_lt_self hε_pos
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable {μ' : Measure α} (c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞)
(hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (f : α → E) (hfμ : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f := by
-- integrability for `μ` implies integrability for `μ'`.
have h_int : ∀ g : α → E, Integrable g μ → Integrable g μ' := fun g hg =>
Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le hg
-- We use `Integrable.induction`
apply hfμ.induction (P := fun f => setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f)
· intro c s hs hμs
have hμ's : μ' s ≠ ∞ := by
refine ((hμ'_le s).trans_lt ?_).ne
rw [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc'.lt_top hμs
rw [setToFun_indicator_const hT hs hμs.ne, setToFun_indicator_const hT' hs hμ's]
· intro f₂ g₂ _ hf₂ hg₂ h_eq_f h_eq_g
rw [setToFun_add hT hf₂ hg₂, setToFun_add hT' (h_int f₂ hf₂) (h_int g₂ hg₂), h_eq_f, h_eq_g]
· refine isClosed_eq (continuous_setToFun hT) ?_
have :
(fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ' T hT' f) = fun f : α →₁[μ] E =>
setToFun μ' T hT' ((h_int f (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f) := by
ext1 f; exact setToFun_congr_ae hT' (Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _).symm
rw [this]
exact (continuous_setToFun hT').comp (continuous_L1_toL1 c' hc' hμ'_le)
· intro f₂ g₂ hfg _ hf_eq
have hfg' : f₂ =ᵐ[μ'] g₂ := (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul hμ'_le).ae_eq hfg
rw [← setToFun_congr_ae hT hfg, hf_eq, setToFun_congr_ae hT' hfg']
theorem setToFun_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (c c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞)
(hμ_le : μ ≤ c • μ') (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ' T hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· exact setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable c' hc' hμ'_le hT hT' f hf
· -- if `f` is not integrable, both `setToFun` are 0.
have h_int : ∀ g : α → E, ¬Integrable g μ → ¬Integrable g μ' := fun g =>
mt fun h => h.of_measure_le_smul hc hμ_le
simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, setToFun_undef _ (h_int f hf)]
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_right {μ' : Measure α}
(hT_add : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + μ') T C') (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + μ')) :
setToFun (μ + μ') T hT_add f = setToFun μ T hT f := by
refine setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable 1 one_ne_top ?_ hT_add hT f hf
rw [one_smul]
nth_rw 1 [← add_zero μ]
exact add_le_add le_rfl bot_le
theorem setToFun_congr_measure_of_add_left {μ' : Measure α}
(hT_add : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (μ + μ') T C') (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C)
(f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + μ')) :
setToFun (μ + μ') T hT_add f = setToFun μ' T hT f := by
refine setToFun_congr_measure_of_integrable 1 one_ne_top ?_ hT_add hT f hf
rw [one_smul]
nth_rw 1 [← zero_add μ']
exact add_le_add_right bot_le μ'
theorem setToFun_top_smul_measure (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (∞ • μ) T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun (∞ • μ) T hT f = 0 := by
refine setToFun_measure_zero' hT fun s _ hμs => ?_
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hμs
simp only [true_and, Measure.smul_apply, ENNReal.mul_eq_top, eq_self_iff_true,
top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff, not_or, Classical.not_not, smul_eq_mul] at hμs
simp only [hμs.right, Measure.smul_apply, mul_zero, smul_eq_mul]
theorem setToFun_congr_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT_smul : DominatedFinMeasAdditive (c • μ) T C')
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun (c • μ) T hT_smul f := by
by_cases hc0 : c = 0
· simp [hc0] at hT_smul
have h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0 := fun s hs _ => hT_smul.eq_zero hs
rw [setToFun_zero_left' _ h, setToFun_measure_zero]
simp [hc0]
refine setToFun_congr_measure c⁻¹ c ?_ hc_ne_top (le_of_eq ?_) le_rfl hT hT_smul f
· simp [hc0]
· rw [smul_smul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hc0 hc_ne_top, one_smul]
theorem norm_setToFun_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC f
theorem norm_setToFun_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ := by
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT f
theorem norm_setToFun_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖hf.toL1 f‖ := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC _
theorem norm_setToFun_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖setToFun μ T hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖hf.toL1 f‖ := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT _
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem provides sufficient conditions under which almost
everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies the convergence of their image by
`setToFun`.
We could weaken the condition `bound_integrable` to require `HasFiniteIntegral bound μ` instead
(i.e. not requiring that `bound` is measurable), but in all applications proving integrability
is easier. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
{fs : ℕ → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(fs_measurable : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => fs n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (fs n)) atTop (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
-- `f` is a.e.-measurable, since it is the a.e.-pointwise limit of a.e.-measurable functions.
have f_measurable : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
aestronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto_ae _ fs_measurable h_lim
-- all functions we consider are integrable
have fs_int : ∀ n, Integrable (fs n) μ := fun n =>
bound_integrable.mono' (fs_measurable n) (h_bound _)
have f_int : Integrable f μ :=
⟨f_measurable,
hasFiniteIntegral_of_dominated_convergence bound_integrable.hasFiniteIntegral h_bound
h_lim⟩
-- it suffices to prove the result for the corresponding L1 functions
suffices
Tendsto (fun n => L1.setToL1 hT ((fs_int n).toL1 (fs n))) atTop
(𝓝 (L1.setToL1 hT (f_int.toL1 f))) by
convert this with n
· exact setToFun_eq hT (fs_int n)
· exact setToFun_eq hT f_int
-- the convergence of setToL1 follows from the convergence of the L1 functions
refine L1.tendsto_setToL1 hT _ _ ?_
-- up to some rewriting, what we need to prove is `h_lim`
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
have lintegral_norm_tendsto_zero :
Tendsto (fun n => ENNReal.toReal <| ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖fs n a - f a‖ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_toReal zero_ne_top).comp
(tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence fs_measurable
bound_integrable.hasFiniteIntegral h_bound h_lim)
convert lintegral_norm_tendsto_zero with n
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
rw [← Integrable.toL1_sub]
refine ((fs_int n).sub f_int).coeFn_toL1.mono fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hx, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι}
{l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {fs : ι → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => fs n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (fs n)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl : ∀ s ∈ l, ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, x b ∈ s := by rwa [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
have h :
{ x : ι | (fun n => AEStronglyMeasurable (fs n) μ) x } ∩
{ x : ι | (fun n => ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs n a‖ ≤ bound a) x } ∈ l :=
inter_mem hfs_meas h_bound
obtain ⟨k, h⟩ := hxl _ h
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ?_ bound_integrable ?_ ?_
· exact fun n => (h _ (self_le_add_left _ _)).1
· exact fun n => (h _ (self_le_add_left _ _)).2
· filter_upwards [h_lim]
refine fun a h_lin => @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) (fun n => fs n a) _ _ _ h_lin ?_
rwa [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
{fs : X → α → E} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => fs x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) s x₀ :=
tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ‹_› ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
theorem continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} (hfs_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => fs x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) x₀ :=
tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence hT bound ‹_› ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›
theorem continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X} (hfs_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => fs x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x)) s := by
intro x hx
refine continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated hT ?_ ?_ bound_integrable ?_
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx using hfs_meas x hx
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx using h_bound x hx
· filter_upwards [h_cont] with a ha using ha x hx
theorem continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {fs : X → α → E}
{bound : α → ℝ} (hfs_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (fs x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖fs x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => fs x a) : Continuous fun x => setToFun μ T hT (fs x) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun _ =>
continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated hT (Eventually.of_forall hfs_meas)
(Eventually.of_forall h_bound) ‹_› <|
h_cont.mono fun _ => Continuous.continuousAt
end Function
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 1,433 | 1,438 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Absolute values in linear ordered rings.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_zpow (n : ℤ) (a : α) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ |n| := by
obtain n0 | n0 := le_total 0 n
· obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le n0
simp only [mabs_pow, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
· obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (neg_nonneg.2 n0)
rw [← mabs_inv, ← zpow_neg, ← abs_neg, h, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, zpow_natCast]
exact mabs_pow m _
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
lemma odd_abs [LinearOrder α] [Ring α] {a : α} : Odd (abs a) ↔ Odd a := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, odd_neg]
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma abs_one : |(1 : α)| = 1 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_one
lemma abs_two : |(2 : α)| = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma abs_mul (a b : α) : |a * b| = |a| * |b| := by
rw [abs_eq (mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b))]
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha <;> rcases le_total b 0 with hb | hb <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, true_or, or_true, eq_self_iff_true, neg_mul,
mul_neg, neg_neg, *]
/-- `abs` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
def absHom : α →*₀ α where
toFun := abs
map_zero' := abs_zero
map_one' := abs_one
map_mul' := abs_mul
@[simp]
lemma abs_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a ^ n| = |a| ^ n := (absHom.toMonoidHom : α →* α).map_pow _ _
lemma pow_abs (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a| ^ n = |a ^ n| := (abs_pow a n).symm
lemma Even.pow_abs (hn : Even n) (a : α) : |a| ^ n = a ^ n := by
rw [← abs_pow, abs_eq_self]; exact hn.pow_nonneg _
lemma abs_neg_one_pow (n : ℕ) : |(-1 : α) ^ n| = 1 := by rw [← pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
lemma abs_pow_eq_one (a : α) (h : n ≠ 0) : |a ^ n| = 1 ↔ |a| = 1 := by
convert pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) zero_le_one h
exacts [(pow_abs _ _).symm, (one_pow _).symm]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma abs_mul_abs_self (a : α) : |a| * |a| = a * a :=
abs_by_cases (fun x => x * x = a * a) rfl (neg_mul_neg a a)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_self (a : α) : |a * a| = a * a := by rw [abs_mul, abs_mul_abs_self]
lemma abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq : |a| = |b| ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact (mul_self_inj (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)).symm
lemma abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt : |a| < |b| ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_iff_mul_self_le : |a| ≤ |b| ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one : |a| ≤ 1 ↔ a * a ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [abs_one, one_mul] using abs_le_iff_mul_self_le (a := a) (b := 1)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma sq_abs (a : α) : |a| ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_abs_self a
lemma abs_sq (x : α) : |x ^ 2| = x ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_self x
lemma sq_lt_sq : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 ↔ |a| < |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_lt_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_lt_sq' (h1 : -b < a) (h2 : a < b) : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
sq_lt_sq.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (abs_lt.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma sq_le_sq : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 ↔ |a| ≤ |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_le_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_le_sq' (h1 : -b ≤ a) (h2 : a ≤ b) : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (le_trans (abs_le.mpr ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| < b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_lt_sq]
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b < a ∧ a < b :=
abs_lt.1 <| abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| ≤ b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_le_sq]
theorem le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_abs_self a |>.trans <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq' (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b :=
abs_le.1 <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs (a b : α) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ |a| = |b| := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, sq_le_sq]
@[simp] lemma sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 ≤ 1 ↔ |a| ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma sq_lt_one_iff_abs_lt_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 < 1 ↔ |a| < 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs (a : α) : 1 ≤ a ^ 2 ↔ 1 ≤ |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
@[simp] lemma one_lt_sq_iff_one_lt_abs (a : α) : 1 < a ^ 2 ↔ 1 < |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
lemma exists_abs_lt {α : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(a : α) : ∃ b > 0, |a| < b :=
⟨|a| + 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one <| by simp, lt_add_one |a|⟩
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
theorem abs_sub_sq (a b : α) : |a - b| * |a - b| = a * a + b * b - (1 + 1) * a * b := by
rw [abs_mul_abs_self]
simp only [mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_one, mul_neg,
| neg_add_rev, neg_neg, add_assoc]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Abs.lean | 154 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Fintype instances for pi types
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Fintype
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {γ δ : α → Type*} {s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)}
/-- Given for all `a : α` a finset `t a` of `δ a`, then one can define the
finset `Fintype.piFinset t` of all functions taking values in `t a` for all `a`. This is the
analogue of `Finset.pi` where the base finset is `univ` (but formally they are not the same, as
there is an additional condition `i ∈ Finset.univ` in the `Finset.pi` definition). -/
def piFinset (t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) : Finset (∀ a, δ a) :=
(Finset.univ.pi t).map ⟨fun f a => f a (mem_univ a), fun _ _ =>
by simp +contextual [funext_iff]⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_piFinset {t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)} {f : ∀ a, δ a} : f ∈ piFinset t ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ t a := by
constructor
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, and_imp, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, exists_imp,
mem_pi]
rintro g hg hgf a
rw [← hgf]
exact hg a
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, mem_pi]
exact fun hf => ⟨fun a _ => f a, hf, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_piFinset (t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) :
(piFinset t : Set (∀ a, δ a)) = Set.pi Set.univ fun a => t a :=
Set.ext fun x => by
rw [Set.mem_univ_pi]
exact Fintype.mem_piFinset
theorem piFinset_subset (t₁ t₂ : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) (h : ∀ a, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) :
piFinset t₁ ⊆ piFinset t₂ := fun _ hg => mem_piFinset.2 fun a => h a <| mem_piFinset.1 hg a
@[simp]
theorem piFinset_eq_empty : piFinset s = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, s i = ∅ := by simp [piFinset]
@[simp]
theorem piFinset_empty [Nonempty α] : piFinset (fun _ => ∅ : ∀ i, Finset (δ i)) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma piFinset_nonempty : (piFinset s).Nonempty ↔ ∀ a, (s a).Nonempty := by simp [piFinset]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.piFinset_nonempty_of_forall_nonempty⟩ := piFinset_nonempty
lemma _root_.Finset.Nonempty.piFinset_const {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset β}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : (piFinset fun _ : ι ↦ s).Nonempty := piFinset_nonempty.2 fun _ ↦ hs
@[simp]
lemma piFinset_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)) : piFinset s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ by simp
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Pi.lean | 71 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,488 | 1,491 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Uthaiwat, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Nilpotency in polynomial rings.
This file is a place for results related to nilpotency in (single-variable) polynomial rings.
## Main results:
* `Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff`
* `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`
-/
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} {r : R}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {P : R[X]}
lemma isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent ((C r) * X ^ n) := by
refine Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left (commute_X_pow _ _).symm ?_
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨m, ?_⟩
rw [← C_pow, hm, C_0]
lemma isNilpotent_pow_X_mul_C_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent (X ^ n * (C r)) := by
rw [commute_X_pow]
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent n hnil
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_monomial_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsNilpotent (monomial (R := R) n r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simp
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_C_iff :
IsNilpotent (C r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simpa only [← C_pow] using C_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_X_mul_iff :
IsNilpotent (X * P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right_iff (commute_X P) (by simp)] at h
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨k, by simp [(commute_X P).mul_pow, hk]⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_mul_X_iff :
IsNilpotent (P * X) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
rw [← commute_X P]
exact isNilpotent_X_mul_iff
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {P : R[X]}
protected lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent P ↔ ∀ i, IsNilpotent (coeff P i) := by
refine
⟨P.recOnHorner (by simp) (fun p r hp₀ _ hp hpr i ↦ ?_) (fun p _ hnp hpX i ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sum_monomial_eq P]
exact isNilpotent_sum (fun i _ ↦ by simpa only [isNilpotent_monomial_iff] using h i)
· have hr : IsNilpotent (C r) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hpr
replace hp : eval 0 p = 0 := by rwa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero] at hp₀
refine isNilpotent_C_iff.mpr ⟨k, ?_⟩
simpa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero, hp] using congr_arg (fun q ↦ coeff q 0) hk
rcases i with - | i
· simpa [hp₀] using hr
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
apply hp
simpa using Commute.isNilpotent_sub (Commute.all _ _) hpr hr
· rcases i with - | i
· simp
simpa using hnp (isNilpotent_mul_X_iff.mp hpX) i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reflect_iff {P : R[X]} {N : ℕ} (hN : P.natDegree ≤ N) :
IsNilpotent (reflect N P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
simp only [Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff, coeff_reverse]
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h i ↦ ?_⟩ <;> rcases le_or_lt i N with hi | hi
· simpa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hi] using h (N - i)
· simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt hN hi]
· simpa [hi, revAt_le] using h (N - i)
· simpa [revAt_eq_self_of_lt hi] using h i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reverse_iff :
IsNilpotent P.reverse ↔ IsNilpotent P :=
isNilpotent_reflect_iff (le_refl _)
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If its constant term is a unit and its other coefficients are
nilpotent, then `P` is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
theorem isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (hunit : IsUnit (P.coeff 0))
(hnil : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) : IsUnit P := by
induction' h : P.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with k hind generalizing P
by_cases hdeg : P.natDegree = 0
{ rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hdeg]
exact hunit.map C }
set P₁ := P.eraseLead with hP₁
suffices IsUnit P₁ by
rw [← eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff P, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← hP₁]
refine IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_left_of_commute ?_ this (Commute.all _ _)
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent _ (hnil _ hdeg)
have hdeg₂ := lt_of_le_of_lt P.eraseLead_natDegree_le (Nat.sub_lt
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hdeg) zero_lt_one)
refine hind P₁.natDegree ?_ ?_ (fun i hi => ?_) rfl
· simp_rw [P₁, ← h, hdeg₂]
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (Ne.symm hdeg), hunit]
· by_cases H : i ≤ P₁.natDegree
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H hdeg₂)), hnil i hi]
· simp_rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge H), IsNilpotent.zero]
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If `P` is a unit, then all its coefficients are nilpotent,
except its constant term which is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
theorem coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent_of_isUnit (hunit : IsUnit P) :
IsUnit (P.coeff 0) ∧ (∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) := by
obtain ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := IsUnit.exists_right_inv hunit
constructor
· refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (Q.coeff 0) ?_
have h := (mul_coeff_zero P Q).symm
rwa [hQ, coeff_one_zero] at h
· intros n hn
rw [nilpotent_iff_mem_prime]
intros I hI
let f := mapRingHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
have hPQ : degree (f P) = 0 ∧ degree (f Q) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff, ← degree_mul, ← map_mul, hQ, map_one, degree_one]
have hcoeff : (f P).coeff n = 0 := by
refine coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt ?_
rw [hPQ.1]
exact WithBot.coe_pos.2 hn.bot_lt
rw [coe_mapRingHom, coeff_map, ← RingHom.mem_ker, Ideal.mk_ker] at hcoeff
exact hcoeff
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. `P` is a unit if and only if all its coefficients are
nilpotent, except its constant term which is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff'`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent :
IsUnit P ↔ IsUnit (P.coeff 0) ∧ (∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) :=
⟨coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent_of_isUnit, fun H => isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent H.1 H.2⟩
@[simp] lemma isUnit_C_add_X_mul_iff :
IsUnit (C r + X * P) ↔ IsUnit r ∧ IsNilpotent P := by
have : ∀ i, coeff (C r + X * P) (i + 1) = coeff P i := by simp
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent, Nat.forall_ne_zero_iff, this]
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_zero, mul_coeff_zero, coeff_X_zero, zero_mul, add_zero,
and_congr_right_iff, ← Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff]
| lemma isUnit_iff' :
IsUnit P ↔ IsUnit (eval 0 P) ∧ IsNilpotent (P /ₘ X) := by
suffices P = C (eval 0 P) + X * (P /ₘ X) by
conv_lhs => rw [this]; simp
conv_lhs => rw [← modByMonic_add_div P monic_X]
simp [modByMonic_X]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Nilpotent.lean | 167 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
end NoBotOrder
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot F]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (hlim : Filter.Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨆ i, f i = a :=
have := F.nonempty_of_neBot
(IsLUB.range_of_tendsto hle hlim).ciSup_eq
theorem iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, f i < a) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Iic (f i) = Iio a := by
have obs : a ∉ range f := by
rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (hlt i).false
rw [← biUnion_range, (IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (le_of_lt <| hlt ·) hlim).biUnion_Iic_eq_Iio obs]
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Ioi : IsOpen (Ioi a) := by
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
isOpen_Ioi.interior_eq
theorem Ioi_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioi h
theorem eventually_gt_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b < x := Ioi_mem_nhds hab
theorem Ici_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ici a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_nhds h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem eventually_ge_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b ≤ x := Ici_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u < f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_gt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_gt_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u ≤ f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_ge_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le
protected theorem Dense.exists_gt [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi (exists_gt x)
protected theorem Dense.exists_ge [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(hs.exists_gt x).imp fun _ h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩
theorem Dense.exists_ge' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (htop : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
| ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := by
by_cases hx : IsTop x
· exact ⟨x, htop x hx, le_rfl⟩
· simp only [IsTop, not_forall, not_le] at hx
rcases hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi hx with ⟨y, hys, hy : x < y⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, hy.le⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 236 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Robin Carlier
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.OfChosenFiniteProducts.Symmetric
/-!
# Categories with chosen finite products
We introduce a class, `ChosenFiniteProducts`, which bundles explicit choices
for a terminal object and binary products in a category `C`.
This is primarily useful for categories which have finite products with good
definitional properties, such as the category of types.
Given a category with such an instance, we also provide the associated
symmetric monoidal structure so that one can write `X ⊗ Y` for the explicit
binary product and `𝟙_ C` for the explicit terminal object.
## Implementation notes
For cartesian monoidal categories, the oplax-monoidal/monoidal/braided structure of a functor `F`
preserving finite products is uniquely determined. See the `ofChosenFiniteProducts` declarations.
We however develop the theory for any `F.OplaxMonoidal`/`F.Monoidal`/`F.Braided` instance instead of
requiring it to be the `ofChosenFiniteProducts` one. This is to avoid diamonds: Consider
eg `𝟭 C` and `F ⋙ G`.
In applications requiring a finite preserving functor to be oplax-monoidal/monoidal/braided,
avoid `attribute [local instance] ofChosenFiniteProducts` but instead turn on the corresponding
`ofChosenFiniteProducts` declaration for that functor only.
# Projects
- Construct an instance of chosen finite products in the category of affine scheme, using
the tensor product.
- Construct chosen finite products in other categories appearing "in nature".
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
/--
An instance of `ChosenFiniteProducts C` bundles an explicit choice of a binary
product of two objects of `C`, and a terminal object in `C`.
Users should use the monoidal notation: `X ⊗ Y` for the product and `𝟙_ C` for
the terminal object.
-/
class ChosenFiniteProducts (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] where
/-- A choice of a limit binary fan for any two objects of the category. -/
product : (X Y : C) → Limits.LimitCone (Limits.pair X Y)
/-- A choice of a terminal object. -/
terminal : Limits.LimitCone (Functor.empty.{0} C)
namespace ChosenFiniteProducts
instance (priority := 100) (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :
MonoidalCategory C :=
monoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts terminal product
instance (priority := 100) (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :
SymmetricCategory C :=
symmetricOfChosenFiniteProducts _ _
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C]
open MonoidalCategory
theorem braiding_eq_braiding (X Y : C) :
(β_ X Y) = Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (product X Y).isLimit (product Y X).isLimit := rfl
/--
The unique map to the terminal object.
-/
def toUnit (X : C) : X ⟶ 𝟙_ C :=
terminal.isLimit.lift <| .mk _ <| .mk (fun x => x.as.elim) fun x => x.as.elim
instance (X : C) : Unique (X ⟶ 𝟙_ C) where
default := toUnit _
uniq _ := terminal.isLimit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => j.elim
/--
This lemma follows from the preexisting `Unique` instance, but
it is often convenient to use it directly as `apply toUnit_unique` forcing
lean to do the necessary elaboration.
-/
lemma toUnit_unique {X : C} (f g : X ⟶ 𝟙_ _) : f = g :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_toUnit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ toUnit Y = toUnit X :=
toUnit_unique _ _
/--
Construct a morphism to the product given its two components.
-/
def lift {T X Y : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) : T ⟶ X ⊗ Y :=
(product X Y).isLimit.lift <| Limits.BinaryFan.mk f g
/--
The first projection from the product.
-/
def fst (X Y : C) : X ⊗ Y ⟶ X :=
letI F : Limits.BinaryFan X Y := (product X Y).cone
F.fst
/--
The second projection from the product.
-/
def snd (X Y : C) : X ⊗ Y ⟶ Y :=
letI F : Limits.BinaryFan X Y := (product X Y).cone
F.snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_fst {T X Y : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) : lift f g ≫ fst _ _ = f := by
simp [lift, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_snd {T X Y : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) : lift f g ≫ snd _ _ = g := by
simp [lift, snd]
instance mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| lift_fst _ _
instance mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| lift_snd _ _
@[ext 1050]
lemma hom_ext {T X Y : C} (f g : T ⟶ X ⊗ Y)
(h_fst : f ≫ fst _ _ = g ≫ fst _ _)
(h_snd : f ≫ snd _ _ = g ≫ snd _ _) :
f = g :=
(product X Y).isLimit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => j.recOn h_fst h_snd
-- Similarly to `CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_lift`, we do not make the `assoc` version a simp
-- lemma
@[reassoc, simp]
lemma comp_lift {V W X Y : C} (f : V ⟶ W) (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ lift g h = lift (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
| lemma lift_fst_snd {X Y : C} : lift (fst X Y) (snd X Y) = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
lemma lift_comp_fst_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) :
lift (f ≫ fst _ _) (f ≫ snd _ _) = f := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/ChosenFiniteProducts.lean | 151 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
|
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 294 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Opposite
/-!
# Calculus of fractions
Following the definitions by [Gabriel and Zisman][gabriel-zisman-1967],
given a morphism property `W : MorphismProperty C` on a category `C`,
we introduce the class `W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions`. The main
result `Localization.exists_leftFraction` is that if `L : C ⥤ D`
is a localization functor for `W`, then for any morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` in `D`,
there exists an auxiliary object `Y' : C` and morphisms `g : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'`,
with `W s`, such that the given morphism is a sort of fraction `g / s`,
or more precisely of the form `L.map g ≫ (Localization.isoOfHom L W s hs).inv`.
We also show that the functor `L.mapArrow : Arrow C ⥤ Arrow D` is essentially surjective.
Similar results are obtained when `W` has a right calculus of fractions.
## References
* [P. Gabriel, M. Zisman, *Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory*][gabriel-zisman-1967]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
open Category
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- A left fraction from `X : C` to `Y : C` for `W : MorphismProperty C` consists of the
datum of an object `Y' : C` and maps `f : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'` such that `W s`. -/
structure LeftFraction (W : MorphismProperty C) (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of a left fraction -/
{Y' : C}
/-- the numerator of a left fraction -/
f : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the denominator of a left fraction -/
s : Y ⟶ Y'
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
namespace LeftFraction
variable (W : MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk f (𝟙 Y) (W.id_mem Y)
variable {W}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `s : Y ⟶ X` such that `W s`. -/
@[simps]
def ofInv (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk (𝟙 X) s hs
/-- If `φ : W.LeftFraction X Y` and `L` is a functor which inverts `W`, this is the
induced morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` -/
noncomputable def map (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y :=
have := hL _ φ.hs
L.map φ.f ≫ inv (L.map φ.s)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_map_s (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
φ.map L hL ≫ L.map φ.s = L.map φ.f := by
letI := hL _ φ.hs
simp [map]
variable (W)
| lemma map_ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
(ofHom W f).map L hL = L.map f := by
simp [map]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/CalculusOfFractions.lean | 80 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Scan
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
universe u
variable {α β γ σ φ : Type*} {m n : ℕ}
namespace List.Vector
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ (cons a v).toList, p x) :
(cons a v).pmap f hp = cons (f a (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.1))
(v.pmap f (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.2)) := rfl
/-- Opposite direction of `Vector.pmap_cons` -/
theorem pmap_cons' {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(ha : p a) (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
cons (f a ha) (v.pmap f hp) = (cons a v).pmap f (by simpa [ha]) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.map f)[i] = f v[i] := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_map, List.getElem_map]
@[simp]
theorem toList_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).toList = v.toList.pmap f hp := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).head = f v.head (hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, head_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inl rfl) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).tail = v.tail.pmap f (fun x hx ↦ hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inr hx) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.pmap f hp)[i] = f v[i] (hp _ (by simp [getElem_def, List.getElem_mem])) := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_pmap, List.getElem_pmap]
theorem get_eq_get_toList (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias get_eq_get := get_eq_get_toList
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.getElem_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get_toList]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get_toList]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get (v : Vector α n) : ofFn (get v) = v := by
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩
apply toList_injective
dsimp
simpa only [toList_ofFn] using List.ofFn_get _
/-- The natural equivalence between length-`n` vectors and functions from `Fin n`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.vectorEquivFin (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) : Vector α n ≃ (Fin n → α) :=
⟨Vector.get, Vector.ofFn, Vector.ofFn_get, fun f => funext <| Vector.get_ofFn f⟩
theorem get_tail (x : Vector α n) (i) : x.tail.get i = x.get ⟨i.1 + 1, by omega⟩ := by
obtain ⟨i, ih⟩ := i; dsimp
rcases x with ⟨_ | _, h⟩ <;> try rfl
rw [List.length] at h
rw [← h] at ih
contradiction
@[simp]
theorem get_tail_succ : ∀ (v : Vector α n.succ) (i : Fin n), get (tail v) i = get v i.succ
| ⟨a :: l, e⟩, ⟨i, h⟩ => by simp [get_eq_get_toList]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, v.tail.val = v.val.tail
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- The `tail` of a `nil` vector is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : (@nil α).tail = nil :=
rfl
/-- The `tail` of a vector made up of one element is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem singleton_tail : ∀ (v : Vector α 1), v.tail = Vector.nil
| ⟨[_], _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) : tail (ofFn f) = ofFn fun i => f i.succ :=
(ofFn_get _).symm.trans <| by
congr
funext i
rw [get_tail, get_ofFn]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty (v : Vector α 0) : v.toList = [] :=
List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp v.2
/-- The list that makes up a `Vector` made up of a single element,
retrieved via `toList`, is equal to the list of that single element. -/
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (v : Vector α 1) : v.toList = [v.head] := by
rw [← v.cons_head_tail]
simp only [toList_cons, toList_nil, head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, singleton_tail]
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList_eq_ff (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : v.toList.isEmpty = false :=
match v with
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem not_empty_toList (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : ¬v.toList.isEmpty := by
simp only [empty_toList_eq_ff, Bool.coe_sort_false, not_false_iff]
/-- Mapping under `id` does not change a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_id {n : ℕ} (v : Vector α n) : Vector.map id v = v :=
Vector.eq _ _ (by simp only [List.map_id, Vector.toList_map])
theorem nodup_iff_injective_get {v : Vector α n} : v.toList.Nodup ↔ Function.Injective v.get := by
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := v
subst hl
exact List.nodup_iff_injective_get
theorem head?_toList : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, (toList v).head? = some (head v)
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- Reverse a vector. -/
def reverse (v : Vector α n) : Vector α n :=
⟨v.toList.reverse, by simp⟩
/-- The `List` of a vector after a `reverse`, retrieved by `toList` is equal
to the `List.reverse` after retrieving a vector's `toList`. -/
theorem toList_reverse {v : Vector α n} : v.reverse.toList = v.toList.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {v : Vector α n} : v.reverse.reverse = v := by
cases v
simp [Vector.reverse]
@[simp]
theorem get_zero : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, get v 0 = head v
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) : head (ofFn f) = f 0 := by
rw [← get_zero, get_ofFn]
theorem get_cons_zero (a : α) (v : Vector α n) : get (a ::ᵥ v) 0 = a := by simp [get_zero]
/-- Accessing the nth element of a vector made up
of one element `x : α` is `x` itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem get_cons_nil : ∀ {ix : Fin 1} (x : α), get (x ::ᵥ nil) ix = x
| ⟨0, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_cons_succ (a : α) (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) : get (a ::ᵥ v) i.succ = get v i := by
rw [← get_tail_succ, tail_cons]
/-- The last element of a `Vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
def last (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : α :=
v.get (Fin.last n)
/-- The last element of a `Vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
theorem last_def {v : Vector α (n + 1)} : v.last = v.get (Fin.last n) :=
rfl
/-- The `last` element of a vector is the `head` of the `reverse` vector. -/
theorem reverse_get_zero {v : Vector α (n + 1)} : v.reverse.head = v.last := by
rw [← get_zero, last_def, get_eq_get_toList, get_eq_get_toList]
simp_rw [toList_reverse]
rw [List.get_eq_getElem, List.get_eq_getElem, ← Option.some_inj, Fin.cast, Fin.cast,
← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_reverse]
· congr
simp
· simp
section Scan
variable {β : Type*}
variable (f : β → α → β) (b : β)
variable (v : Vector α n)
/-- Construct a `Vector β (n + 1)` from a `Vector α n` by scanning `f : β → α → β`
from the "left", that is, from 0 to `Fin.last n`, using `b : β` as the starting value.
-/
def scanl : Vector β (n + 1) :=
⟨List.scanl f b v.toList, by rw [List.length_scanl, toList_length]⟩
/-- Providing an empty vector to `scanl` gives the starting value `b : β`. -/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_nil : scanl f b nil = b ::ᵥ nil :=
rfl
/-- The recursive step of `scanl` splits a vector `x ::ᵥ v : Vector α (n + 1)`
into the provided starting value `b : β` and the recursed `scanl`
`f b x : β` as the starting value.
This lemma is the `cons` version of `scanl_get`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_cons (x : α) : scanl f b (x ::ᵥ v) = b ::ᵥ scanl f (f b x) v := by
simp only [scanl, toList_cons, List.scanl]; dsimp
simp only [cons]
/-- The underlying `List` of a `Vector` after a `scanl` is the `List.scanl`
of the underlying `List` of the original `Vector`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_val : ∀ {v : Vector α n}, (scanl f b v).val = List.scanl f b v.val
| _ => rfl
/-- The `toList` of a `Vector` after a `scanl` is the `List.scanl`
| of the `toList` of the original `Vector`.
-/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 331 | 333 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,316 | 1,318 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I = I := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq, ← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
classical
apply Associates.eq_of_eq_counts
· apply Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
· apply Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
intro v hv
obtain ⟨J, hJv⟩ := Associates.exists_rep v
rw [← hJv, Associates.irreducible_mk] at hv
rw [← hJv]
apply Ideal.finprod_count
⟨J, Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (irreducible_iff_prime.mp hv), Irreducible.ne_zero hv⟩ I hI
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, when both sides are regarded as fractional
ideals of `R`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)) = I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization hI]
rw [FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_finprod R⁰ K (le_refl _)]
simp_rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow,
zpow_natCast]
end Ideal
/-! ### Factorization of fractional ideals of Dedekind domains -/
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Int IsLocalization
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) = I := by
have hJ_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have hJ := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K hJ_ne_zero
have ha_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have ha := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K ha_ne_zero
rw [haJ, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← hJ, ← ha,
← finprod_inv_distrib]
simp_rw [← zpow_neg]
rw [← finprod_mul_distrib (Ideal.finite_mulSupport_coe hJ_ne_zero)
(Ideal.finite_mulSupport_inv ha_ne_zero)]
apply finprod_congr
intro v
rw [← zpow_add₀ ((@coeIdeal_ne_zero R _ K _ _ _ _).mpr v.ne_bot), sub_eq_add_neg]
open scoped Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction {n : R} (hn : n ≠ 0) (d : ↥R⁰) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑d : R)}) :
Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) := by
have hd_ne_zero : (algebraMap R K) (d : R) ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ (IsFractionRing.injective R K) d.property
have h0 : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) ≠ 0 := by
rw [spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨(map_ne_zero_iff (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K)).mpr hn, hd_ne_zero⟩
have hI : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) d)⁻¹ * ↑(Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R) := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
apply congr_arg
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
exact finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization h0 hI
open Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0)
(k : K) (hk : I = spanSingleton R⁰ k) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose
(mk'_surjective R⁰ k)} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑(choose
(choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)) : ↥R⁰) : R)}) : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = I := by
set n : R := choose (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)
set d : ↥R⁰ := choose (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hnd : mk' K n d = k := choose_spec (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
rw [← hnd, h, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, map_zero, zero_div, spanSingleton_zero] at hk
exact hI hk
rw [finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction hn0 d, hk, hnd]
variable (K)
open Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`,
then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we set `val_v(I) = 0`. -/
def count (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : ℤ :=
dite (I = 0) (fun _ : I = 0 => 0) fun _ : ¬I = 0 =>
let a := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
let J := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ)
/-- val_v(0) = 0. -/
lemma count_zero : count K v (0 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by simp only [count, dif_pos]
open Classical in
lemma count_ne_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk
(choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)))).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)})).factors : ℤ) := by
simp only [count, dif_neg hI]
open Classical in
/-- `val_v(I)` does not depend on the choice of `a` and `J` used to represent `I`. -/
theorem count_well_defined {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (h_aJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) := by
set a₁ := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
set J₁ := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
have h_a₁J₁ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁)⁻¹ * ↑J₁ :=
(choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).2
have h_a₁_ne_zero : a₁ ≠ 0 := (choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).1
have h_J₁_ne_zero : J₁ ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_a₁J₁
have h_a_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_J_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_a₁' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
have h_a' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
rw [ne_eq, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h_a_ne_zero
exact h_a_ne_zero
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by
exact Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
rw [h_a₁J₁, ← div_spanSingleton, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_div_iff h_a₁' h_a',
← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_mul, ← coeIdeal_mul] at h_aJ
rw [count, dif_neg hI, sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, ← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_add,
natCast_inj, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.mk_mul_mk, coeIdeal_injective h_aJ]
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_a_ne_zero
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. -/
theorem count_mul {I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hI' : I' ≠ 0) :
count K v (I * I') = count K v I + count K v I' := by
classical
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, haJ⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
have ha_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha
have hJ_ne_zero : Associates.mk J ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ)
obtain ⟨a', J', ha', haJ'⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I'
have ha'_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a'} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha'
have hJ'_ne_zero : Associates.mk J' ≠ 0 :=
Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI' haJ')
have h_prod : I * I' = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) (a * a'))⁻¹ * ↑(J * J') := by
rw [haJ, haJ', mul_assoc, mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K), mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, coeIdeal_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_inv,
mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)]
rw [count_well_defined K v hI haJ, count_well_defined K v hI' haJ',
count_well_defined K v (mul_ne_zero hI hI') h_prod, ← Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.count_mul hJ_ne_zero hJ'_ne_zero hv, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
← Associates.mk_mul_mk, Associates.count_mul ha_ne_zero ha'_ne_zero hv]
push_cast
ring
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. If `I` or `I'` is zero, then
`val_v(I*I') = 0`. -/
theorem count_mul' (I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) [Decidable (I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0)] :
count K v (I * I') = if I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0 then count K v I + count K v I' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_mul K v h.1 h.2
· push_neg at h
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
· rw [h hI, MulZeroClass.mul_zero, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
/-- val_v(1) = 0. -/
theorem count_one : count K v (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have h1 : (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑(1 : Ideal R) := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, coeIdeal_top, mul_one, inv_one,
spanSingleton_one]
rw [count_well_defined K v one_ne_zero h1, Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, sub_self]
theorem count_prod {ι} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) (hS : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0) :
count K v (∏ i ∈ s, I i) = ∑ i ∈ s, count K v (I i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi hrec
· rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty, count_one]
· have hS' : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := fun j hj => hS j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
have hS0 : ∏ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr hS'
have hi0 : I i ≠ 0 := hS i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, Finset.sum_insert hi, count_mul K v hi0 hS0, hrec hS']
/-- For every `n ∈ ℕ` and every ideal `I`, `val_v(I^n) = n*val_v(I)`. -/
theorem count_pow (n : ℕ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
induction' n with n h
· rw [pow_zero, ofNat_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count_one]
· classical rw [pow_succ, count_mul']
by_cases hI : I = 0
· have h_neg : ¬(I ^ n ≠ 0 ∧ I ≠ 0) := by
rw [not_and', not_not, ne_eq]
intro h
exact absurd hI h
rw [if_neg h_neg, hI, count_zero, MulZeroClass.mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (And.intro (pow_ne_zero n hI) hI), h, Nat.cast_add,
Nat.cast_one]
ring
/-- `val_v(v) = 1`, when `v` is regarded as a fractional ideal. -/
theorem count_self : count K v (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 := by
have hv : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr v.ne_bot
have h_self : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑v.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hv_irred : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
classical rw [count_well_defined K v hv h_self, Associates.count_self hv_irred,
Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero hv_irred, ofNat_zero, sub_zero, ofNat_one]
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℕ`. -/
theorem count_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_pow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- `val_v(I⁻ⁿ) = -val_v(Iⁿ)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_neg_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ (-n)) = - count K v (I ^ n) := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, neg_zero, zpow_zero, count_one, neg_zero]
· rw [hI, zero_zpow n hn, zero_zpow (-n) (neg_ne_zero.mpr hn), count_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← count_mul K v (zpow_ne_zero _ hI) (zpow_ne_zero _ hI),
← zpow_add₀ hI, neg_add_cancel, zpow_zero]
exact count_one K v
theorem count_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I⁻¹) = - count K v I := by
rw [← zpow_neg_one, count_neg_zpow K v (1 : ℤ) I, zpow_one]
/-- `val_v(Iⁿ) = n*val_v(I)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
obtain n | n := n
· rw [ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact count_pow K v n I
· rw [negSucc_eq, count_neg_zpow, ← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast, count_pow]
ring
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow_self (n : ℤ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_zpow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- If `v ≠ w` are two maximal ideals of `R`, then `val_v(w) = 0`. -/
theorem count_maximal_coprime {w : HeightOneSpectrum R} (hw : w ≠ v) :
count K v (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have hw_fact : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑w.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hw_ne_zero : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr w.ne_bot
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
have hw' : Irreducible (Associates.mk w.asIdeal) := by apply w.associates_irreducible
classical
rw [count_well_defined K v hw_ne_zero hw_fact, Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top,
Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one, Associates.count_zero hv, ofNat_zero, sub_zero,
natCast_eq_zero, ← pow_one (Associates.mk w.asIdeal), Associates.factors_prime_pow hw',
Associates.count_some hv, Multiset.replicate_one, Multiset.count_eq_zero,
Multiset.mem_singleton]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq]
rw [Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_iff_eq, ← HeightOneSpectrum.ext_iff]
exact Ne.symm hw
theorem count_maximal (w : HeightOneSpectrum R) [Decidable (w = v)] :
| count K v (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = if w = v then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, count_self]
· exact count_maximal_coprime K v h
/-- `val_v(∏_{w ≠ v} w^{exps w}) = 0`. -/
theorem count_finprod_coprime (exps : HeightOneSpectrum R → ℤ) :
count K v (∏ᶠ (w : HeightOneSpectrum R) (_ : w ≠ v),
(w.asIdeal : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) ^ exps w) = 0 := by
apply finprod_mem_induction fun I => count K v I = 0
· exact count_one K v
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 466 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Miscellaneous lemmas about the integers
This file contains lemmas about integers, which require further imports than
`Data.Int.Basic` or `Data.Int.Order`.
-/
open Nat
namespace Int
theorem le_natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : (m - n : ℤ) ≤ ↑(m - n : ℕ) := by
by_cases h : m ≥ n
· exact le_of_eq (Int.ofNat_sub h).symm
· simp [le_of_not_ge h, ofNat_le]
/-! ### `succ` and `pred` -/
theorem succ_natCast_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : ℤ) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.mpr (by simp)
/-! ### `natAbs` -/
theorem natAbs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs = b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq
theorem natAbs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs < b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt
theorem natAbs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs ≤ b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_le_iff_mul_self_le
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = b := by rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ ha hb, ← natAbs_eq_iff_sq_eq]
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg, neg_inj] using
natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = -b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg] using natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ -a = b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg] using natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) hb
/-- A specialization of `abs_sub_le_of_nonneg_of_le` for working with the signed subtraction
of natural numbers. -/
theorem natAbs_coe_sub_coe_le_of_le {a b n : ℕ} (a_le_n : a ≤ n) (b_le_n : b ≤ n) :
natAbs (a - b : ℤ) ≤ n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℤ), natCast_natAbs]
exact abs_sub_le_of_nonneg_of_le (ofNat_nonneg a) (ofNat_le.mpr a_le_n)
(ofNat_nonneg b) (ofNat_le.mpr b_le_n)
/-- A specialization of `abs_sub_lt_of_nonneg_of_lt` for working with the signed subtraction
of natural numbers. -/
theorem natAbs_coe_sub_coe_lt_of_lt {a b n : ℕ} (a_lt_n : a < n) (b_lt_n : b < n) :
natAbs (a - b : ℤ) < n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℤ), natCast_natAbs]
exact abs_sub_lt_of_nonneg_of_lt (ofNat_nonneg a) (ofNat_lt.mpr a_lt_n)
(ofNat_nonneg b) (ofNat_lt.mpr b_lt_n)
|
section Intervals
open Set
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Lemmas.lean | 82 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ExactSequence
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Refinements
/-!
# The snake lemma
The snake lemma is a standard tool in homological algebra. The basic situation
is when we have a diagram as follows in an abelian category `C`, with exact rows:
L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂ ⟶ L₁.X₃ ⟶ 0
| | |
|v₁₂.τ₁ |v₁₂.τ₂ |v₁₂.τ₃
v v v
0 ⟶ L₂.X₁ ⟶ L₂.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₃
We shall think of this diagram as the datum of a morphism `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂` in the
category `ShortComplex C` such that both `L₁` and `L₂` are exact, and `L₁.g` is epi
and `L₂.f` is a mono (which is equivalent to saying that `L₁.X₃` is the cokernel
of `L₁.f` and `L₂.X₁` is the kernel of `L₂.g`). Then, we may introduce the kernels
and cokernels of the vertical maps. In other words, we may introduce short complexes
`L₀` and `L₃` that are respectively the kernel and the cokernel of `v₁₂`. All these
data constitute a `SnakeInput C`.
Given such a `S : SnakeInput C`, we define a connecting homomorphism
`S.δ : L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁` and show that it is part of an exact sequence
`L₀.X₁ ⟶ L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂ ⟶ L₃.X₃`. Each of the four exactness
statement is first stated separately as lemmas `L₀_exact`, `L₁'_exact`,
`L₂'_exact` and `L₃_exact` and the full 6-term exact sequence is stated
as `snake_lemma`. This sequence can even be extended with an extra `0`
on the left (see `mono_L₀_f`) if `L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂` is a mono (i.e. `L₁` is short exact),
and similarly an extra `0` can be added on the right (`epi_L₃_g`)
if `L₂.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₃` is an epi (i.e. `L₂` is short exact).
These results were also obtained in the Liquid Tensor Experiment. The code and the proof
here are slightly easier because of the use of the category `ShortComplex C`,
the use of duality (which allows to construct only half of the sequence, and deducing
the other half by arguing in the opposite category), and the use of "refinements"
(see `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Refinements`) instead of a weak form of pseudo-elements.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Abelian C]
namespace ShortComplex
/-- A snake input in an abelian category `C` consists of morphisms
of short complexes `L₀ ⟶ L₁ ⟶ L₂ ⟶ L₃` (which should be visualized vertically) such
that `L₀` and `L₃` are respectively the kernel and the cokernel of `L₁ ⟶ L₂`,
`L₁` and `L₂` are exact, `L₁.g` is epi and `L₂.f` is mono. -/
structure SnakeInput where
/-- the zeroth row -/
L₀ : ShortComplex C
/-- the first row -/
L₁ : ShortComplex C
/-- the second row -/
L₂ : ShortComplex C
/-- the third row -/
L₃ : ShortComplex C
/-- the morphism from the zeroth row to the first row -/
v₀₁ : L₀ ⟶ L₁
/-- the morphism from the first row to the second row -/
v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂
/-- the morphism from the second row to the third row -/
v₂₃ : L₂ ⟶ L₃
w₀₂ : v₀₁ ≫ v₁₂ = 0 := by aesop_cat
w₁₃ : v₁₂ ≫ v₂₃ = 0 := by aesop_cat
/-- `L₀` is the kernel of `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂`. -/
h₀ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι _ w₀₂)
/-- `L₃` is the cokernel of `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂`. -/
h₃ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ _ w₁₃)
L₁_exact : L₁.Exact
epi_L₁_g : Epi L₁.g
L₂_exact : L₂.Exact
mono_L₂_f : Mono L₂.f
initialize_simps_projections SnakeInput (-h₀, -h₃)
namespace SnakeInput
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] w₀₂ w₁₃
attribute [instance] epi_L₁_g
attribute [instance] mono_L₂_f
variable {C}
variable (S : SnakeInput C)
/-- The snake input in the opposite category that is deduced from a snake input. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def op : SnakeInput Cᵒᵖ where
L₀ := S.L₃.op
L₁ := S.L₂.op
L₂ := S.L₁.op
L₃ := S.L₀.op
epi_L₁_g := by dsimp; infer_instance
mono_L₂_f := by dsimp; infer_instance
v₀₁ := opMap S.v₂₃
v₁₂ := opMap S.v₁₂
v₂₃ := opMap S.v₀₁
w₀₂ := congr_arg opMap S.w₁₃
w₁₃ := congr_arg opMap S.w₀₂
h₀ := isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' (ShortComplex.opEquiv C).functor _
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ S.h₃)
h₃ := isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit' (ShortComplex.opEquiv C).functor _
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ S.h₀)
L₁_exact := S.L₂_exact.op
L₂_exact := S.L₁_exact.op
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₁ : S.v₀₁.τ₁ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₁ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₂ : S.v₀₁.τ₂ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₂]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₃ : S.v₀₁.τ₃ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₃ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₃]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₁ : S.v₁₂.τ₁ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₂ : S.v₁₂.τ₂ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₂ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₂]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₃ : S.v₁₂.τ₃ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₃ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₃]
/-- `L₀.X₁` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₁ : L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₂.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₁ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₁ S.w₀₂_τ₁) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₁ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
/-- `L₀.X₂` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₂ : L₁.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₂ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₂ S.w₀₂_τ₂) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₂ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
/-- `L₀.X₃` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₃ : L₁.X₃ ⟶ L₂.X₃`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₃ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₃ S.w₀₂_τ₃) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₃ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₁ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₁ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₁
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₂ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₂ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₂
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₃ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₃ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₃
/-- The upper part of the first column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₁_up : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₀₁.τ₁ S.v₁₂.τ₁
(by rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₁])).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ S.h₀τ₁
| /-- The upper part of the second column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₂_up : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₀₁.τ₂ S.v₁₂.τ₂
(by rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₂])).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ S.h₀τ₂
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/SnakeLemma.lean | 152 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
/-! # The groupoid of `C^n`, fiberwise-linear maps
This file contains preliminaries for the definition of a `C^n` vector bundle: an associated
`StructureGroupoid`, the groupoid of `contMDiffFiberwiseLinear` functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped Manifold Topology
/-! ### The groupoid of `C^n`, fiberwise-linear maps -/
variable {𝕜 B F : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
namespace FiberwiseLinear
variable {φ φ' : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F} {U U' : Set B}
/-- For `B` a topological space and `F` a `𝕜`-normed space, a map from `U : Set B` to `F ≃L[𝕜] F`
determines a partial homeomorphism from `B × F` to itself by its action fiberwise. -/
def partialHomeomorph (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) :
PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) where
toFun x := (x.1, φ x.1 x.2)
invFun x := (x.1, (φ x.1).symm x.2)
source := U ×ˢ univ
target := U ×ˢ univ
map_source' _x hx := mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _)
map_target' _x hx := mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _)
left_inv' _ _ := Prod.ext rfl (ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply _ _)
right_inv' _ _ := Prod.ext rfl (ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply _ _)
open_source := hU.prod isOpen_univ
open_target := hU.prod isOpen_univ
continuousOn_toFun :=
have : ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => ((φ p.1 : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ) :=
hφ.prodMap continuousOn_id
continuousOn_fst.prodMk (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn this)
continuousOn_invFun :=
have : ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => (((φ p.1).symm : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ) :=
h2φ.prodMap continuousOn_id
continuousOn_fst.prodMk (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn this)
/-- Compute the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem trans_partialHomeomorph_apply (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) (hU' : IsOpen U')
(hφ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') (b : B) (v : F) :
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ')
⟨b, v⟩ =
⟨b, φ' b (φ b v)⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Compute the source of the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem source_trans_partialHomeomorph (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) (hU' : IsOpen U')
(hφ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') :
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ').source =
(U ∩ U') ×ˢ univ := by
dsimp only [FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph]; mfld_set_tac
/-- Compute the target of the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem target_trans_partialHomeomorph (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) (hU' : IsOpen U')
(hφ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') :
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ').target =
(U ∩ U') ×ˢ univ := by
dsimp only [FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph]; mfld_set_tac
end FiberwiseLinear
variable {EB : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup EB] [NormedSpace 𝕜 EB] {HB : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace HB] [ChartedSpace HB B] {IB : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 EB HB}
/-- Let `e` be a partial homeomorphism of `B × F`. Suppose that at every point `p` in the source of
`e`, there is some neighbourhood `s` of `p` on which `e` is equal to a bi-`C^n` fiberwise linear
partial homeomorphism.
Then the source of `e` is of the form `U ×ˢ univ`, for some set `U` in `B`, and, at any point `x` in
`U`, admits a neighbourhood `u` of `x` such that `e` is equal on `u ×ˢ univ` to some bi-`C^n`
fiberwise linear partial homeomorphism. -/
theorem ContMDiffFiberwiseLinear.locality_aux₁
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) (e : PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F))
(h : ∀ p ∈ e.source, ∃ s : Set (B × F), IsOpen s ∧ p ∈ s ∧
∃ (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (u : Set B) (hu : IsOpen u)
(hφ : ContMDiffOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) n (fun x => (φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) u)
(h2φ : ContMDiffOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) n (fun x => ((φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) u),
| (e.restr s).EqOnSource
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hu hφ.continuousOn h2φ.continuousOn)) :
∃ U : Set B, e.source = U ×ˢ univ ∧ ∀ x ∈ U,
∃ (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (u : Set B) (hu : IsOpen u) (_huU : u ⊆ U) (_hux : x ∈ u),
∃ (hφ : ContMDiffOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) n (fun x => (φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) u)
(h2φ : ContMDiffOn IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) n (fun x => ((φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) u),
(e.restr (u ×ˢ univ)).EqOnSource
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hu hφ.continuousOn h2φ.continuousOn) := by
rw [SetCoe.forall'] at h
choose s hs hsp φ u hu hφ h2φ heφ using h
have hesu : ∀ p : e.source, e.source ∩ s p = u p ×ˢ univ := by
intro p
rw [← e.restr_source' (s _) (hs _)]
exact (heφ p).1
have hu' : ∀ p : e.source, (p : B × F).fst ∈ u p := by
intro p
have : (p : B × F) ∈ e.source ∩ s p := ⟨p.prop, hsp p⟩
simpa only [hesu, mem_prod, mem_univ, and_true] using this
have heu : ∀ p : e.source, ∀ q : B × F, q.fst ∈ u p → q ∈ e.source := by
intro p q hq
have : q ∈ u p ×ˢ (univ : Set F) := ⟨hq, trivial⟩
rw [← hesu p] at this
exact this.1
have he : e.source = (Prod.fst '' e.source) ×ˢ (univ : Set F) := by
apply HasSubset.Subset.antisymm
· intro p hp
exact ⟨⟨p, hp, rfl⟩, trivial⟩
· rintro ⟨x, v⟩ ⟨⟨p, hp, rfl : p.fst = x⟩, -⟩
exact heu ⟨p, hp⟩ (p.fst, v) (hu' ⟨p, hp⟩)
refine ⟨Prod.fst '' e.source, he, ?_⟩
rintro x ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
refine ⟨φ ⟨p, hp⟩, u ⟨p, hp⟩, hu ⟨p, hp⟩, ?_, hu' _, hφ ⟨p, hp⟩, h2φ ⟨p, hp⟩, ?_⟩
· intro y hy; exact ⟨(y, 0), heu ⟨p, hp⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ hy, rfl⟩
· rw [← hesu, e.restr_source_inter]; exact heφ ⟨p, hp⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias SmoothFiberwiseLinear.locality_aux₁ := ContMDiffFiberwiseLinear.locality_aux₁
/-- Let `e` be a partial homeomorphism of `B × F` whose source is `U ×ˢ univ`, for some set `U` in
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/FiberwiseLinear.lean | 109 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.Algebra.GradedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
/-!
# Weighted homogeneous polynomials
It is possible to assign weights (in a commutative additive monoid `M`) to the variables of a
multivariate polynomial ring, so that monomials of the ring then have a weighted degree with
respect to the weights of the variables. The weights are represented by a function `w : σ → M`,
where `σ` are the indeterminates.
A multivariate polynomial `φ` is weighted homogeneous of weighted degree `m : M` if all monomials
occurring in `φ` have the same weighted degree `m`.
## Main definitions/lemmas
* `weightedTotalDegree' w φ` : the weighted total degree of a multivariate polynomial with respect
to the weights `w`, taking values in `WithBot M`.
* `weightedTotalDegree w φ` : When `M` has a `⊥` element, we can define the weighted total degree
of a multivariate polynomial as a function taking values in `M`.
* `IsWeightedHomogeneous w φ m`: a predicate that asserts that `φ` is weighted homogeneous
of weighted degree `m` with respect to the weights `w`.
* `weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m`: the submodule of homogeneous polynomials
of weighted degree `m`.
* `weightedHomogeneousComponent w m`: the additive morphism that projects polynomials
onto their summand that is weighted homogeneous of degree `n` with respect to `w`.
* `sum_weightedHomogeneousComponent`: every polynomial is the sum of its weighted homogeneous
components.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finset Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid M]
/-! ### `weight` -/
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup M]
/-- The weighted total degree of a multivariate polynomial, taking values in `WithBot M`. -/
def weightedTotalDegree' (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : WithBot M :=
p.support.sup fun s => weight w s
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree'` of a polynomial `p` is `⊥` if and only if `p = 0`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree'_eq_bot_iff (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
weightedTotalDegree' w p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree', Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff, mem_support_iff, WithBot.coe_ne_bot,
MvPolynomial.eq_zero_iff]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => Classical.not_not
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree'` of the zero polynomial is `⊥`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree'_zero (w : σ → M) :
weightedTotalDegree' w (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ⊥ := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree', support_zero, Finset.sup_empty]
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot M]
/-- When `M` has a `⊥` element, we can define the weighted total degree of a multivariate
polynomial as a function taking values in `M`. -/
def weightedTotalDegree (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : M :=
p.support.sup fun s => weight w s
/-- This lemma relates `weightedTotalDegree` and `weightedTotalDegree'`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree_coe (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
weightedTotalDegree' w p = ↑(weightedTotalDegree w p) := by
rw [Ne, ← weightedTotalDegree'_eq_bot_iff w p, ← Ne, WithBot.ne_bot_iff_exists] at hp
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hp
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [weightedTotalDegree, weightedTotalDegree', Finset.sup_le_iff, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
intro b
exact Finset.le_sup
· simp only [weightedTotalDegree]
have hm' : weightedTotalDegree' w p ≤ m := le_of_eq hm.symm
rw [← hm]
simpa [weightedTotalDegree'] using hm'
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree` of the zero polynomial is `⊥`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree_zero (w : σ → M) :
weightedTotalDegree w (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ⊥ := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree, support_zero, Finset.sup_empty]
theorem le_weightedTotalDegree (w : σ → M) {φ : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : σ →₀ ℕ}
(hd : d ∈ φ.support) : weight w d ≤ φ.weightedTotalDegree w :=
le_sup hd
end OrderBot
end SemilatticeSup
/-- A multivariate polynomial `φ` is weighted homogeneous of weighted degree `m` if all monomials
occurring in `φ` have weighted degree `m`. -/
def IsWeightedHomogeneous (w : σ → M) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (m : M) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃d⦄, coeff d φ ≠ 0 → weight w d = m
variable (R)
/-- The submodule of homogeneous `MvPolynomial`s of degree `n`. -/
def weightedHomogeneousSubmodule (w : σ → M) (m : M) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) where
carrier := { x | x.IsWeightedHomogeneous w m }
smul_mem' r a ha c hc := by
rw [coeff_smul] at hc
exact ha (right_ne_zero_of_mul hc)
zero_mem' _ hd := False.elim (hd <| coeff_zero _)
add_mem' {a} {b} ha hb c hc := by
rw [coeff_add] at hc
obtain h | h : coeff c a ≠ 0 ∨ coeff c b ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
simp only [hc, add_zero]
· exact ha h
· exact hb h
@[simp]
theorem mem_weightedHomogeneousSubmodule (w : σ → M) (m : M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p ∈ weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m ↔ p.IsWeightedHomogeneous w m :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The submodule `weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m` of homogeneous `MvPolynomial`s of
degree `n` is equal to the `R`-submodule of all `p : (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R` such that
`p.support ⊆ {d | weight w d = m}`. While equal, the former has a
convenient definitional reduction. -/
theorem weightedHomogeneousSubmodule_eq_finsupp_supported (w : σ → M) (m : M) :
weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m = Finsupp.supported R R { d | weight w d = m } := by
ext x
rw [mem_supported, Set.subset_def]
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, mem_coe]
rfl
variable {R}
/-- The submodule generated by products `Pm * Pn` of weighted homogeneous polynomials of degrees `m`
and `n` is contained in the submodule of weighted homogeneous polynomials of degree `m + n`. -/
theorem weightedHomogeneousSubmodule_mul (w : σ → M) (m n : M) :
weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m * weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w n ≤
weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w (m + n) := by
classical
rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intro φ hφ ψ hψ c hc
| rw [coeff_mul] at hc
obtain ⟨⟨d, e⟩, hde, H⟩ := Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hc
have aux : coeff d φ ≠ 0 ∧ coeff e ψ ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! H
by_cases h : coeff d φ = 0 <;>
simp_all only [Ne, not_false_iff, zero_mul, mul_zero]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/WeightedHomogeneous.lean | 168 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
· intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
apply AnalyticOn.comp _ _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
· exact ContinuousLinearEquiv.analyticOn _ _
· exact (h'p i).comp (g.analyticOn _) (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
((((hf.of_le hi).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap
g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl h's hx).symm
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear equiv. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
fderivWithin 𝕜
(ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft _ (fun _x : Fin i => g) ∘
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s ∘ g)) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
rw [this, ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx),
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', coe_coe, comp_apply, tail_def, tail_def]
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G →L[𝕜] E) {f : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : G) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x =
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ _) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)‖ := by
have : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f hs hx i
rw [this, ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F) (x : G)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ (g x)) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
constructor
· intro H
simpa [← preimage_comp, Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
· intro H
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H
exact H.comp_continuousLinearMap _
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
| ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffOn_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 451 | 457 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.Shift
/-! Shifting cochains
Let `C` be a preadditive category. Given two cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`),
the type of cochains `HomComplex.Cochain K L n` of degree `n` was introduced
in `Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex`. In this file, we
study how these cochains behave with respect to the shift on the complexes `K`
and `L`.
When `n`, `a`, `n'` are integers such that `h : n' + a = n`,
we obtain `rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' h : Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n'`.
This definition does not involve signs, but the analogous definition
of `leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' h' : Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'`
when `h' : n + a = n'` does involve signs, as we follow the conventions
appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
{K L M : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n : ℤ}
namespace CochainComplex.HomComplex
namespace Cochain
variable (γ γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K L n)
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n'` when `n' + a = n`. -/
def rightShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => γ.v p (p + n) rfl ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q (p + n) (by omega)).inv)
lemma rightShift_v (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n' = q)
(p' : ℤ) (hp' : p + n = p') :
(γ.rightShift a n' hn').v p q hpq = γ.v p p' hp' ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q p' (by rw [← hp', ← hpq, ← hn', add_assoc])).inv := by
subst hp'
dsimp only [rightShift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'` when `n + a = n'`. -/
def leftShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p (p + a) rfl).hom ≫ γ.v (p+a) q (by omega))
lemma leftShift_v (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n' = q)
(p' : ℤ) (hp' : p' + n = q) :
(γ.leftShift a n' hn').v p q hpq = (a * n' + ((a * (a - 1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p p'
(by rw [← add_left_inj n, hp', add_assoc, add_comm a, hn', hpq])).hom ≫ γ.v p' q hp' := by
obtain rfl : p' = p + a := by omega
dsimp only [leftShift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' → Cochain K L n` when `n' + a = n`. -/
def rightUnshift {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n) :
Cochain K L n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => γ.v p (p + n') rfl ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a (p + n') q (by rw [← hpq, add_assoc, hn])).hom)
lemma rightUnshift_v {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n)
(p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' : ℤ) (hp' : p + n' = p') :
(γ.rightUnshift n hn).v p q hpq = γ.v p p' hp' ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p' q (by rw [← hpq, ← hn, ← add_assoc, hp'])).hom := by
subst hp'
dsimp only [rightUnshift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' → Cochain K L n` when `n + a = n'`. -/
def leftUnshift {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') :
Cochain K L n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a (p - a) p (by omega)).inv ≫ γ.v (p-a) q (by omega))
lemma leftUnshift_v {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n')
(p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' : ℤ) (hp' : p' + n' = q) :
(γ.leftUnshift n hn).v p q hpq = (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p' p (by omega)).inv ≫ γ.v p' q (by omega) := by
obtain rfl : p' = p - a := by omega
rfl
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n`. -/
def shift (a : ℤ) : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p _ rfl).hom ≫
γ.v (p + a) (q + a) (by omega) ≫ (L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q _ rfl).inv)
lemma shift_v (a : ℤ) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' q' : ℤ)
(hp' : p' = p + a) (hq' : q' = q + a) :
(γ.shift a).v p q hpq = (K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p p' hp').hom ≫
γ.v p' q' (by rw [hp', hq', ← hpq, add_assoc, add_comm a, add_assoc]) ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q q' hq').inv := by
subst hp' hq'
rfl
lemma shift_v' (a : ℤ) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(γ.shift a).v p q hpq = γ.v (p + a) (q + a) (by omega) := by
simp only [shift_v γ a p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X, shiftFunctorObjXIso,
HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_rightShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ.rightShift a n' hn').rightUnshift n hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [rightUnshift_v _ n hn' p q hpq (p + n') rfl,
γ.rightShift_v _ _ hn' p (p + n') rfl q hpq,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_rightUnshift {a n' : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ.rightUnshift n hn').rightShift a n' hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [(γ.rightUnshift n hn').rightShift_v a n' hn' p q hpq (p + n) rfl,
γ.rightUnshift_v n hn' p (p + n) rfl q hpq,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_leftShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ.leftShift a n' hn').leftUnshift n hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
rw [(γ.leftShift a n' hn').leftUnshift_v n hn' p q hpq (q-n') (by omega),
γ.leftShift_v a n' hn' (q-n') q (by omega) p hpq, Linear.comp_units_smul,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, smul_smul, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_leftUnshift {a n' : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ.leftUnshift n hn').leftShift a n' hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
rw [(γ.leftUnshift n hn').leftShift_v a n' hn' p q hpq (q-n) (by omega),
γ.leftUnshift_v n hn' (q-n) q (by omega) p hpq, Linear.comp_units_smul, smul_smul,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_add (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ₁ + γ₂).rightShift a n' hn' = γ₁.rightShift a n' hn' + γ₂.rightShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [rightShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq _ rfl, add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_add (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ₁ + γ₂).leftShift a n' hn' = γ₁.leftShift a n' hn' + γ₂.leftShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [leftShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq (p + a) (by omega), add_v, comp_add, smul_add]
@[simp]
lemma shift_add (a : ℤ) :
(γ₁ + γ₂).shift a = γ₁.shift a + γ₂.shift a := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [shift_v', add_v]
variable (K L)
/-- The additive equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K L⟦a⟧ n'` when `n' + a = n`. -/
@[simps]
def rightShiftAddEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' where
toFun γ := γ.rightShift a n' hn'
invFun γ := γ.rightUnshift n hn'
left_inv γ := by simp only [rightUnshift_rightShift]
right_inv γ := by simp only [rightShift_rightUnshift]
map_add' γ γ' := by simp only [rightShift_add]
/-- The additive equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'` when `n + a = n'`. -/
@[simps]
def leftShiftAddEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' where
toFun γ := γ.leftShift a n' hn'
invFun γ := γ.leftUnshift n hn'
left_inv γ := by simp only [leftUnshift_leftShift]
right_inv γ := by simp only [leftShift_leftUnshift]
map_add' γ γ' := by simp only [leftShift_add]
/-- The additive map `Cochain K L n →+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftAddHom (n a : ℤ) : Cochain K L n →+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun γ => γ.shift a) (by intros; dsimp; simp only [shift_add])
variable (n)
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_zero (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(0 : Cochain K L n).rightShift a n' hn' = 0 := by
change rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn' 0 = 0
apply map_zero
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_zero (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(0 : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n').rightUnshift n hn' = 0 := by
change (rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn').symm 0 = 0
apply map_zero
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_zero (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(0 : Cochain K L n).leftShift a n' hn' = 0 := by
change leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn' 0 = 0
apply map_zero
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_zero (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(0 : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n').leftUnshift n hn' = 0 := by
change (leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn').symm 0 = 0
apply map_zero
@[simp]
lemma shift_zero (a : ℤ) :
(0 : Cochain K L n).shift a = 0 := by
change shiftAddHom K L n a 0 = 0
apply map_zero
variable {K L n}
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_neg (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(-γ).rightShift a n' hn' = -γ.rightShift a n' hn' := by
change rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn' (-γ) = _
apply map_neg
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_neg {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n) :
(-γ).rightUnshift n hn = -γ.rightUnshift n hn := by
change (rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn).symm (-γ) = _
apply map_neg
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_neg (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(-γ).leftShift a n' hn' = -γ.leftShift a n' hn' := by
change leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn' (-γ) = _
apply map_neg
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_neg {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') :
(-γ).leftUnshift n hn = -γ.leftUnshift n hn := by
change (leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn).symm (-γ) = _
apply map_neg
@[simp]
lemma shift_neg (a : ℤ) :
(-γ).shift a = -γ.shift a := by
change shiftAddHom K L n a (-γ) = _
apply map_neg
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_add {n' a : ℤ} (γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n) :
(γ₁ + γ₂).rightUnshift n hn = γ₁.rightUnshift n hn + γ₂.rightUnshift n hn := by
change (rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn).symm (γ₁ + γ₂) = _
apply map_add
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_add {n' a : ℤ} (γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') :
(γ₁ + γ₂).leftUnshift n hn = γ₁.leftUnshift n hn + γ₂.leftUnshift n hn := by
change (leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn).symm (γ₁ + γ₂) = _
apply map_add
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_smul (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) (x : R) :
(x • γ).rightShift a n' hn' = x • γ.rightShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [rightShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq _ rfl, smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_smul (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') (x : R) :
(x • γ).leftShift a n' hn' = x • γ.leftShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [leftShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq (p + a) (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul,
smul_comm x]
@[simp]
lemma shift_smul (a : ℤ) (x : R) :
(x • γ).shift a = x • (γ.shift a) := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [shift_v', smul_v]
variable (K L R)
/-- The linear equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K L⟦a⟧ n'` when `n' + a = n` and
the category is `R`-linear. -/
@[simps!]
def rightShiftLinearEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
Cochain K L n ≃ₗ[R] Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' :=
(rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn').toLinearEquiv
(fun x γ => by dsimp; simp only [rightShift_smul])
/-- The additive equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'` when `n + a = n'` and
the category is `R`-linear. -/
@[simps!]
def leftShiftLinearEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') :
Cochain K L n ≃ₗ[R] Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' :=
(leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' hn).toLinearEquiv
(fun x γ => by dsimp; simp only [leftShift_smul])
/-- The linear map `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n` when the category is `R`-linear. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftLinearMap (n a : ℤ) :
Cochain K L n →ₗ[R] Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n where
toAddHom := shiftAddHom K L n a
map_smul' _ _ := by dsimp; simp only [shift_smul]
variable {K L R}
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_units_smul (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) (x : Rˣ) :
(x • γ).rightShift a n' hn' = x • γ.rightShift a n' hn' := by
apply rightShift_smul
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_units_smul (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') (x : Rˣ) :
(x • γ).leftShift a n' hn' = x • γ.leftShift a n' hn' := by
apply leftShift_smul
@[simp]
lemma shift_units_smul (a : ℤ) (x : Rˣ) :
(x • γ).shift a = x • (γ.shift a) := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [shift_v', units_smul_v]
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_smul {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n) (x : R) :
(x • γ).rightUnshift n hn = x • γ.rightUnshift n hn := by
change (rightShiftLinearEquiv R K L n a n' hn).symm (x • γ) = _
apply map_smul
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_units_smul {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ)
(hn : n' + a = n) (x : Rˣ) :
(x • γ).rightUnshift n hn = x • γ.rightUnshift n hn := by
apply rightUnshift_smul
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_smul {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') (x : R) :
(x • γ).leftUnshift n hn = x • γ.leftUnshift n hn := by
change (leftShiftLinearEquiv R K L n a n' hn).symm (x • γ) = _
apply map_smul
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_units_smul {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ)
(hn : n + a = n') (x : Rˣ) :
(x • γ).leftUnshift n hn = x • γ.leftUnshift n hn := by
apply leftUnshift_smul
lemma rightUnshift_comp {m : ℤ} {a : ℤ} (γ' : Cochain L (M⟦a⟧) m) {nm : ℤ} (hnm : n + m = nm)
(nm' : ℤ) (hnm' : nm + a = nm') (m' : ℤ) (hm' : m + a = m') :
(γ.comp γ' hnm).rightUnshift nm' hnm' =
| γ.comp (γ'.rightUnshift m' hm') (by omega) := by
ext p q hpq
rw [(γ.comp γ' hnm).rightUnshift_v nm' hnm' p q hpq (p + n + m) (by omega),
γ.comp_v γ' hnm p (p + n) (p + n + m) rfl rfl,
comp_v _ _ (show n + m' = nm' by omega) p (p + n) q (by omega) (by omega),
γ'.rightUnshift_v m' hm' (p + n) q (by omega) (p + n + m) rfl, assoc]
lemma leftShift_comp (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') {m t t' : ℤ} (γ' : Cochain L M m)
(h : n + m = t) (ht' : t + a = t') :
(γ.comp γ' h).leftShift a t' ht' = (a * m).negOnePow • (γ.leftShift a n' hn').comp γ'
(by rw [← ht', ← h, ← hn', add_assoc, add_comm a, add_assoc]) := by
ext p q hpq
have h' : n' + m = t' := by omega
dsimp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplexShift.lean | 366 | 379 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
| refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 937 | 940 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,409 | 1,413 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Counit
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Invertible
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Defs
/-!
# Witt vectors
This file verifies that the ring operations on `WittVector p R`
satisfy the axioms of a commutative ring.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector.map`: lifts a ring homomorphism `R →+* S` to a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 S`.
* `WittVector.ghostComponent n x`: evaluates the `n`th Witt polynomial
on the first `n` coefficients of `x`, producing a value in `R`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
* `WittVector.ghostMap`: a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* (ℕ → R)`, obtained by packaging
all the ghost components together.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, then the ghost map is an equivalence,
which we use to define the ring operations on `𝕎 R`.
* `WittVector.CommRing`: the ring structure induced by the ghost components.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## Implementation details
As we prove that the ghost components respect the ring operations, we face a number of repetitive
proofs. To avoid duplicating code we factor these proofs into a custom tactic, only slightly more
powerful than a tactic macro. This tactic is not particularly useful outside of its applications
in this file.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Function
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
local notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- type as `\bbW`
open scoped Witt
namespace WittVector
/-- `f : α → β` induces a map from `𝕎 α` to `𝕎 β` by applying `f` componentwise.
If `f` is a ring homomorphism, then so is `f`, see `WittVector.map f`. -/
def mapFun (f : α → β) : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β := fun x => mk _ (f ∘ x.coeff)
namespace mapFun
-- Porting note: switched the proof to tactic mode. I think that `ext` was the issue.
theorem injective (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f) : Injective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := by
intros _ _ h
ext p
exact hf (congr_arg (fun x => coeff x p) h :)
theorem surjective (f : α → β) (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := fun x =>
⟨mk _ fun n => Classical.choose <| hf <| x.coeff n,
by ext n; simp only [mapFun, coeff_mk, comp_apply, Classical.choose_spec (hf (x.coeff n))]⟩
/-- Auxiliary tactic for showing that `mapFun` respects the ring operations. -/
-- porting note: a very crude port.
macro "map_fun_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| (
ext n
simp only [mapFun, mk, comp_apply, zero_coeff, map_zero,
-- Porting note: the lemmas on the next line do not have the `simp` tag in mathlib4
add_coeff, sub_coeff, mul_coeff, neg_coeff, nsmul_coeff, zsmul_coeff, pow_coeff,
peval, map_aeval, algebraMap_int_eq, coe_eval₂Hom] <;>
try { cases n <;> simp <;> done } <;> -- Porting note: this line solves `one`
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl <;>
ext ⟨i, k⟩ <;>
fin_cases i <;> rfl))
variable [Fact p.Prime]
-- Porting note: using `(x y : 𝕎 R)` instead of `(x y : WittVector p R)` produced sorries.
variable (f : R →+* S) (x y : WittVector p R)
-- and until `pow`.
-- We do not tag these lemmas as `@[simp]` because they will be bundled in `map` later on.
theorem zero : mapFun f (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := by map_fun_tac
theorem one : mapFun f (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := by map_fun_tac
theorem add : mapFun f (x + y) = mapFun f x + mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem sub : mapFun f (x - y) = mapFun f x - mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem mul : mapFun f (x * y) = mapFun f x * mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem neg : mapFun f (-x) = -mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : WittVector p R) : mapFun f (n • x) = n • mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : WittVector p R) : mapFun f (z • x) = z • mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem pow (n : ℕ) : mapFun f (x ^ n) = mapFun f x ^ n := by map_fun_tac
theorem natCast (n : ℕ) : mapFun f (n : 𝕎 R) = n :=
show mapFun f n.unaryCast = (n : WittVector p S) by
induction n <;> simp [*, Nat.unaryCast, add, one, zero] <;> rfl
theorem intCast (n : ℤ) : mapFun f (n : 𝕎 R) = n :=
show mapFun f n.castDef = (n : WittVector p S) by
cases n <;> simp [*, Int.castDef, add, one, neg, zero, natCast] <;> rfl
end mapFun
end WittVector
namespace WittVector
/-- Evaluates the `n`th Witt polynomial on the first `n` coefficients of `x`,
producing a value in `R`.
This function will be bundled as the ring homomorphism `WittVector.ghostMap`
once the ring structure is available,
but we rely on it to set up the ring structure in the first place. -/
private def ghostFun : 𝕎 R → ℕ → R := fun x n => aeval x.coeff (W_ ℤ n)
section Tactic
open Lean Elab Tactic
/-- An auxiliary tactic for proving that `ghostFun` respects the ring operations. -/
elab "ghost_fun_tac" φ:term "," fn:term : tactic => do
evalTactic (← `(tactic| (
ext n
have := congr_fun (congr_arg (@peval R _ _) (wittStructureInt_prop p $φ n)) $fn
simp only [wittZero, OfNat.ofNat, Zero.zero, wittOne, One.one,
HAdd.hAdd, Add.add, HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, Neg.neg, HMul.hMul, Mul.mul,HPow.hPow, Pow.pow,
wittNSMul, wittZSMul, HSMul.hSMul, SMul.smul]
simpa +unfoldPartialApp [WittVector.ghostFun, aeval_rename, aeval_bind₁,
comp, uncurry, peval, eval] using this
)))
end Tactic
section GhostFun
-- The following lemmas are not `@[simp]` because they will be bundled in `ghostMap` later on.
@[local simp]
theorem matrix_vecEmpty_coeff {R} (i j) :
@coeff p R (Matrix.vecEmpty i) j = (Matrix.vecEmpty i : ℕ → R) j := by
rcases i with ⟨_ | _ | _ | _ | i_val, ⟨⟩⟩
variable [Fact p.Prime]
variable (x y : WittVector p R)
private theorem ghostFun_zero : ghostFun (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := by
ghost_fun_tac 0, ![]
private theorem ghostFun_one : ghostFun (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := by
ghost_fun_tac 1, ![]
private theorem ghostFun_add : ghostFun (x + y) = ghostFun x + ghostFun y := by
ghost_fun_tac X 0 + X 1, ![x.coeff, y.coeff]
private theorem ghostFun_natCast (i : ℕ) : ghostFun (i : 𝕎 R) = i :=
show ghostFun i.unaryCast = _ by
induction i <;> simp [*, Nat.unaryCast, ghostFun_zero, ghostFun_one, ghostFun_add]
private theorem ghostFun_sub : ghostFun (x - y) = ghostFun x - ghostFun y := by
ghost_fun_tac X 0 - X 1, ![x.coeff, y.coeff]
private theorem ghostFun_mul : ghostFun (x * y) = ghostFun x * ghostFun y := by
ghost_fun_tac X 0 * X 1, ![x.coeff, y.coeff]
private theorem ghostFun_neg : ghostFun (-x) = -ghostFun x := by ghost_fun_tac -X 0, ![x.coeff]
private theorem ghostFun_intCast (i : ℤ) : ghostFun (i : 𝕎 R) = i :=
show ghostFun i.castDef = _ by
cases i <;> simp [*, Int.castDef, ghostFun_natCast, ghostFun_neg]
private lemma ghostFun_nsmul (m : ℕ) (x : WittVector p R) : ghostFun (m • x) = m • ghostFun x := by
ghost_fun_tac m • (X 0), ![x.coeff]
private lemma ghostFun_zsmul (m : ℤ) (x : WittVector p R) : ghostFun (m • x) = m • ghostFun x := by
ghost_fun_tac m • (X 0), ![x.coeff]
private theorem ghostFun_pow (m : ℕ) : ghostFun (x ^ m) = ghostFun x ^ m := by
ghost_fun_tac X 0 ^ m, ![x.coeff]
end GhostFun
variable (p) (R)
/-- The bijection between `𝕎 R` and `ℕ → R`, under the assumption that `p` is invertible in `R`.
In `WittVector.ghostEquiv` we upgrade this to an isomorphism of rings. -/
private def ghostEquiv' [Invertible (p : R)] : 𝕎 R ≃ (ℕ → R) where
toFun := ghostFun
invFun x := mk p fun n => aeval x (xInTermsOfW p R n)
left_inv := by
intro x
ext n
have := bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW p R n
apply_fun aeval x.coeff at this
simpa +unfoldPartialApp only [aeval_bind₁, aeval_X, ghostFun,
aeval_wittPolynomial]
right_inv := by
intro x
ext n
have := bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial p R n
apply_fun aeval x at this
simpa only [aeval_bind₁, aeval_X, ghostFun, aeval_wittPolynomial]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
@[local instance]
| private def comm_ring_aux₁ : CommRing (𝕎 (MvPolynomial R ℚ)) :=
(ghostEquiv' p (MvPolynomial R ℚ)).injective.commRing ghostFun ghostFun_zero ghostFun_one
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean | 226 | 227 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
end Embedding
end PadicSeq
/-- The `p`-adic numbers `ℚ_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
-/
def Padic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (padicNorm p)
/-- notation for p-padic rationals -/
notation "ℚ_[" p "]" => Padic p
namespace Padic
section Completion
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance field : Field ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.field
instance : Inhabited ℚ_[p] :=
⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : CommRing ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.commRing
instance : Ring ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.ring
instance : Zero ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : One ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Add ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Mul ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Sub ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Neg ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Div ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : PadicSeq p → ℚ_[p] :=
Quotient.mk'
variable (p)
theorem zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
theorem mk_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padicNorm p) q ≈ const (padicNorm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨fun heq ↦ eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| const_limZero.1 heq, fun heq ↦ by
rw [heq]⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ Quotient.eq'.1, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
instance : CharZero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun m n ↦ by
rw [← Rat.cast_natCast]
norm_cast
exact id⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y :=
Rat.cast_add _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x :=
Rat.cast_neg _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y :=
Rat.cast_mul _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y :=
Rat.cast_sub _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y :=
Rat.cast_div _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
end Completion
end Padic
/-- The rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]` is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `‖ ‖`. -/
def padicNormE {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] : AbsoluteValue ℚ_[p] ℚ where
toFun := Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _
map_mul' q r := Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_mul
nonneg' q := Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
eq_zero' q := Quotient.inductionOn q fun r ↦ by
rw [Padic.zero_def, Quotient.eq]
exact PadicSeq.norm_zero_iff r
add_le' q r := by
trans
max ((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) q)
((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) r)
· exact Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonarchimedean
refine max_le_add_of_nonneg (Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg) ?_
exact Quotient.inductionOn r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
namespace padicNormE
section Embedding
open PadicSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem defn (f : PadicSeq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (Padic.mk f - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- `change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε` also works, but is very slow
suffices hyp : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε by peel hyp with N; use N
by_contra! h
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := cauchy₂ f hε
rcases h N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩
have hne : ¬f - const (padicNorm p) (f i) ≈ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos h] at hge
exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε
unfold PadicSeq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge
cases _root_.le_total N (stationaryPoint hne) with
| inl hgen =>
exact hN _ hgen _ hi
| inr hngen =>
have := stationaryPoint_spec hne le_rfl hngen
rw [← this]
exact hN _ le_rfl _ hi
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) ≤ max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r → padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) = max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r fun _ _ ↦ PadicSeq.add_eq_max_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padicNormE (q : ℚ_[p]) = padicNorm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padicNormE q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-n) :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun f hf ↦
have : ¬f ≈ 0 := (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf
norm_values_discrete f this
end Embedding
end padicNormE
namespace Padic
section Complete
open PadicSeq Padic
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (f : CauSeq _ (@padicNormE p _))
theorem rat_dense' (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, padicNormE (q - r : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun q' ↦
have : ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, padicNorm p (q' m - q' n) < ε := cauchy₂ _ hε
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this
⟨q' N, by
classical
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- Porting note: this used to be `change`, but that times out.
convert_to PadicSeq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (q' - const (padicNorm p) (q' N) ≈ 0) with heq | hne'
· simpa only [heq, PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos]
· simp only [PadicSeq.norm, dif_neg hne']
change padicNorm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (stationaryPoint hne' ≤ N) with hle | hle
· have := (stationaryPoint_spec hne' le_rfl hle).symm
simp only [const_apply, sub_apply, padicNorm.zero, sub_self] at this
simpa only [this]
· exact hN _ (lt_of_not_ge hle).le _ le_rfl⟩
private theorem div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < 1 / (n + 1 : ℚ) :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (mod_cast succ_pos _)
/-- `limSeq f`, for `f` a Cauchy sequence of `p`-adic numbers, is a sequence of rationals with the
same limit point as `f`. -/
def limSeq : ℕ → ℚ :=
fun n ↦ Classical.choose (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - (limSeq f i : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
refine (exists_nat_gt (1 / ε)).imp fun N hN i hi ↦ ?_
have h := Classical.choose_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i))
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h ((div_le_iff₀' <| mod_cast succ_pos _).mpr ?_)
rw [right_distrib]
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg
· exact (div_le_iff₀ hε).mp (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (mod_cast hi))
· apply le_of_lt
simpa
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) (limSeq f) := fun ε hε ↦ by
have hε3 : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3
exists max N N2
intro j hj
suffices
padicNormE (limSeq f j - f (max N N2) + (f (max N N2) - limSeq f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε by
ring_nf at this ⊢
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
exact mod_cast this
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· rw [← add_thirds ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· suffices padicNormE (limSeq f j - f j + (f j - f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε / 3 + ε / 3 by
simpa only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· apply _root_.add_lt_add
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
apply mod_cast hN j
exact le_of_max_le_left hj
· exact hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hj) _ (le_max_right _ _)
· apply mod_cast hN (max N N2)
apply le_max_left
private def lim' : PadicSeq p :=
⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] :=
⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (q - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
⟨lim f, fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (half_pos hε)
obtain ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padicNormE.defn (lim' f) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨max N N2, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel _ (lim' f i : ℚ_[p]) _]
refine (padicNormE.add_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· apply hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hi)
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN _ (le_of_max_le_left hi)⟩
theorem complete'' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - q : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete' f
refine ⟨x, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx ε hε
refine ⟨N, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN i hi
end Complete
section NormedSpace
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Dist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y ↦ padicNormE (x - y : ℚ_[p])⟩
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y z ↦ by simpa [dist] using padicNormE.nonarchimedean' (x - y) (y - z)⟩
instance metricSpace : MetricSpace ℚ_[p] where
dist_self := by simp [dist]
dist := dist
dist_comm x y := by simp [dist, ← padicNormE.map_neg (x - y : ℚ_[p])]
dist_triangle x y z := by
dsimp [dist]
exact mod_cast padicNormE.sub_le x y z
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by
dsimp [dist]; intro _ _ h
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
apply padicNormE.eq_zero.1
exact mod_cast h
instance : Norm ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x ↦ padicNormE x⟩
instance normedField : NormedField ℚ_[p] :=
{ Padic.field,
Padic.metricSpace p with
dist_eq := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
norm_mul := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
norm := norm }
instance isAbsoluteValue : IsAbsoluteValue fun a : ℚ_[p] ↦ ‖a‖ where
abv_nonneg' := norm_nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := norm_eq_zero
abv_add' := norm_add_le
abv_mul' := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
theorem rat_dense (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, ‖q - r‖ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (ε := ε') (by simpa using hε'l)
⟨r, lt_trans (by simpa [Norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
end NormedSpace
end Padic
namespace padicNormE
section NormedSpace
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
-- Porting note: Linter thinks this is a duplicate simp lemma, so `priority` is assigned
@[simp (high)]
protected theorem mul (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ‖q * r‖ = ‖q‖ * ‖r‖ := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
protected theorem is_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ↑(padicNormE q) = ‖q‖ := rfl
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := by
dsimp [norm]
exact mod_cast nonarchimedean' _ _
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖) : ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := by
dsimp [norm] at h ⊢
have : padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r := mod_cast h
exact mod_cast add_eq_max_of_ne' this
@[simp]
theorem eq_padicNorm (q : ℚ) : ‖(q : ℚ_[p])‖ = padicNorm p q := by
dsimp [norm]
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℚ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [← @Rat.cast_natCast ℝ _ p]
rw [← @Rat.cast_natCast ℚ_[p] _ p]
simp [hp.1.ne_zero, hp.1.ne_one, norm, padicNorm, padicValRat, padicValInt, zpow_neg,
-Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem norm_p_lt_one : ‖(p : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
rw [norm_p]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ <| mod_cast hp.1.one_lt
-- Porting note: Linter thinks this is a duplicate simp lemma, so `priority` is assigned
@[simp (high)]
theorem norm_p_zpow (n : ℤ) : ‖(p : ℚ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n) := by
rw [norm_zpow, norm_p, zpow_neg, inv_zpow]
-- Porting note: Linter thinks this is a duplicate simp lemma, so `priority` is assigned
@[simp (high)]
theorem norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℚ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by
rw [← norm_p_zpow, zpow_natCast]
instance : NontriviallyNormedField ℚ_[p] :=
{ Padic.normedField p with
non_trivial :=
⟨p⁻¹, by
rw [norm_inv, norm_p, inv_inv]
exact mod_cast hp.1.one_lt⟩ }
protected theorem image {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, ‖q‖ = ↑((p : ℚ) ^ (-n)) :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun f hf ↦
have : ¬f ≈ 0 := (PadicSeq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := PadicSeq.norm_values_discrete f this
⟨n, by rw [← hn]; rfl⟩
protected theorem is_rat (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∃ q' : ℚ, ‖q‖ = q' := by
classical
exact if h : q = 0 then ⟨0, by simp [h]⟩
else
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padicNormE.image h
⟨_, hn⟩
/-- `ratNorm q`, for a `p`-adic number `q` is the `p`-adic norm of `q`, as rational number.
The lemma `padicNormE.eq_ratNorm` asserts `‖q‖ = ratNorm q`. -/
def ratNorm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ :=
Classical.choose (padicNormE.is_rat q)
theorem eq_ratNorm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ‖q‖ = ratNorm q :=
Classical.choose_spec (padicNormE.is_rat q)
theorem norm_rat_le_one : ∀ {q : ℚ} (_ : ¬p ∣ q.den), ‖(q : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1
| ⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ => fun hq : ¬p ∣ d ↦
if hnz : n = 0 then by
have : (⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ : ℚ) = 0 := Rat.zero_iff_num_zero.mpr hnz
norm_num [this]
else by
have hnz' : (⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ : ℚ) ≠ 0 := mt Rat.zero_iff_num_zero.1 hnz
rw [padicNormE.eq_padicNorm]
norm_cast
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_zero` instead of another `norm_cast` call
rw [padicNorm.eq_zpow_of_nonzero hnz', padicValRat, neg_sub,
padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd hq, Nat.cast_zero, zero_sub, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
apply inv_le_one_of_one_le₀
norm_cast
apply one_le_pow
exact hp.1.pos
theorem norm_int_le_one (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 :=
suffices ‖((z : ℚ) : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 by simpa
norm_rat_le_one <| by simp [hp.1.ne_one]
theorem norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k := by
constructor
· intro h
contrapose! h
apply le_of_eq
rw [eq_comm]
calc
‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖((k : ℚ) : ℚ_[p])‖ := by norm_cast
_ = padicNorm p k := padicNormE.eq_padicNorm _
_ = 1 := mod_cast (int_eq_one_iff k).mpr h
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
push_cast
rw [padicNormE.mul]
calc
_ ≤ ‖(p : ℚ_[p])‖ * 1 :=
mul_le_mul le_rfl (by simpa using norm_int_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ < 1 := by
rw [mul_one, padicNormE.norm_p]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ <| mod_cast hp.1.one_lt
theorem norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k := by
have : (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) = (p : ℚ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by simp
rw [show (k : ℚ_[p]) = ((k : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) by norm_cast, eq_padicNorm, this]
norm_cast
rw [← padicNorm.dvd_iff_norm_le]
theorem eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
_root_.by_contradiction fun hne ↦
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
theorem eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
_root_.by_contradiction fun hne ↦
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
end NormedSpace
end padicNormE
namespace Padic
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
instance complete : CauSeq.IsComplete ℚ_[p] norm where
isComplete f := by
have cau_seq_norm_e : IsCauSeq padicNormE f := fun ε hε => by
have h := isCauSeq f ε (mod_cast hε)
dsimp [norm] at h
exact mod_cast h
-- Porting note: Padic.complete' works with `f i - q`, but the goal needs `q - f i`,
-- using `rewrite [padicNormE.map_sub]` causes time out, so a separate lemma is created
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Padic.complete'' ⟨f, cau_seq_norm_e⟩
exists q
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨ε', hε'⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
norm_cast at hε'
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hq ε' hε'.1
exists N
intro i hi
have h := hN i hi
change norm (f i - q) < ε
refine lt_trans ?_ hε'.2
dsimp [norm]
exact mod_cast h
theorem padicNormE_lim_le {f : CauSeq ℚ_[p] norm} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hf : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ a) :
‖f.lim‖ ≤ a := by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := Setoid.symm (CauSeq.equiv_lim f) _ ha
calc
‖f.lim‖ = ‖f.lim - f N + f N‖ := by simp
_ ≤ max ‖f.lim - f N‖ ‖f N‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
_ ≤ a := max_le (le_of_lt (hN _ le_rfl)) (hf _)
open Filter Set
instance : CompleteSpace ℚ_[p] := by
| apply complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
intro u hu
let c : CauSeq ℚ_[p] norm := ⟨u, Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.mp hu⟩
refine ⟨c.lim, fun s h ↦ ?_⟩
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
have := c.equiv_lim ε ε0
simp only [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, mem_setOf_eq]
exact this.imp fun N hN n hn ↦ hε (hN n hn)
/-! ### Valuation on `ℚ_[p]` -/
/-- `Padic.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on rationals to `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def valuation : ℚ_[p] → ℤ :=
Quotient.lift (@PadicSeq.valuation p _) fun f g h ↦ by
by_cases hf : f ≈ 0
· have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm h) hf
simp [hf, hg, PadicSeq.valuation]
· have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦ hf (Setoid.trans h hg)
rw [PadicSeq.val_eq_iff_norm_eq hf hg]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 917 | 936 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Pietro Monticone
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Embeddings
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Rat
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Units.DirichletTheorem
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
/-!
# Third Cyclotomic Field
We gather various results about the third cyclotomic field. The following notations are used in this
file: `K` is a number field such that `IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K`, `ζ` is any primitive `3`-rd
root of unity in `K`, `η` is the element in the units of the ring of integers corresponding to `ζ`
and `λ = η - 1`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.Units.mem`: Given a unit `u : (𝓞 K)ˣ`, we have that
`u ∈ {1, -1, η, -η, η^2, -η^2}`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent`: Given a unit
`u : (𝓞 K)ˣ`, if `u` is congruent to an integer modulo `3`, then `u = 1` or `u = -1`.
This is a special case of the so-called *Kummer's lemma* (see for example [washington_cyclotomic],
Theorem 5.36
-/
open NumberField Units InfinitePlace nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable {ζ : K} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(3 : ℕ+)) (u : (𝓞 K)ˣ)
local notation3 "η" => (IsPrimitiveRoot.isUnit (hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot) (by decide)).unit
local notation3 "λ" => hζ.toInteger - 1
lemma coe_eta : (η : 𝓞 K) = hζ.toInteger := rfl
lemma _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.toInteger_cube_eq_one : hζ.toInteger ^ 3 = 1 :=
hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot.pow_eq_one
/-- Let `u` be a unit in `(𝓞 K)ˣ`, then `u ∈ [1, -1, η, -η, η^2, -η^2]`. -/
-- Here `List` is more convenient than `Finset`, even if further from the informal statement.
-- For example, `fin_cases` below does not work with a `Finset`.
theorem Units.mem [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] :
u ∈ [1, -1, η, -η, η ^ 2, -η ^ 2] := by
have hrank : rank K = 0 := by
dsimp only [rank]
rw [card_eq_nrRealPlaces_add_nrComplexPlaces, nrRealPlaces_eq_zero (n := 3) K (by decide),
zero_add, nrComplexPlaces_eq_totient_div_two (n := 3)]
rfl
obtain ⟨⟨x, e⟩, hxu, -⟩ := exist_unique_eq_mul_prod _ u
replace hxu : u = x := by
rw [← mul_one x.1, hxu]
apply congr_arg
rw [← Finset.prod_empty]
congr
rw [Finset.univ_eq_empty_iff, hrank]
infer_instance
obtain ⟨n, hnpos, hn⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.1 <| (CommGroup.mem_torsion _ _).1 x.2
replace hn : (↑u : K) ^ ((⟨n, hnpos⟩ : ℕ+) : ℕ) = 1 := by
rw [← map_pow]
convert map_one (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)
rw_mod_cast [hxu, hn]
simp
obtain ⟨r, hr3, hru⟩ := hζ.exists_pow_or_neg_mul_pow_of_isOfFinOrder (by decide)
(isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n, hnpos, hn⟩)
replace hr : r ∈ Finset.Ico 0 3 := Finset.mem_Ico.2 ⟨by simp, hr3⟩
replace hru : ↑u = η ^ r ∨ ↑u = -η ^ r := by
rcases hru with h | h
· left; ext; exact h
· right; ext; exact h
fin_cases hr <;> rcases hru with h | h <;> simp [h]
/-- We have that `λ ^ 2 = -3 * η`. -/
private lemma lambda_sq : λ ^ 2 = -3 * η := by
ext
calc (λ ^ 2 : K) = η ^ 2 + η + 1 - 3 * η := by
simp only [RingOfIntegers.map_mk, IsUnit.unit_spec]; ring
_ = 0 - 3 * η := by simpa using hζ.isRoot_cyclotomic (by decide)
_ = -3 * η := by ring
/-- We have that `η ^ 2 = -η - 1`. -/
lemma eta_sq : (η ^ 2 : 𝓞 K) = - η - 1 := by
rw [← neg_add', ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← add_assoc]
ext; simpa using hζ.isRoot_cyclotomic (by decide)
/-- If a unit `u` is congruent to an integer modulo `λ ^ 2`, then `u = 1` or `u = -1`.
This is a special case of the so-called *Kummer's lemma*. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent
[NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] (hcong : ∃ n : ℤ, λ ^ 2 ∣ (u - n : 𝓞 K)) :
u = 1 ∨ u = -1 := by
replace hcong : ∃ n : ℤ, (3 : 𝓞 K) ∣ (↑u - n : 𝓞 K) := by
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
exact ⟨n, -η * x, by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← lambda_sq, hx]⟩
have hζ := IsCyclotomicExtension.zeta_spec 3 ℚ K
have := Units.mem hζ u
fin_cases this
· left; rfl
· right; rfl
all_goals exfalso
· exact hζ.not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide) hcong
· apply hζ.not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx
refine ⟨-n, -x, sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 ?_⟩
simp only [PNat.val_ofNat, Nat.cast_ofNat, mul_neg, Int.cast_neg, ← neg_add, ← hx,
Units.val_neg, IsUnit.unit_spec, RingOfIntegers.neg_mk, neg_neg]
· exact (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two'
(by decide) hcong
· apply (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two'
(by decide)
obtain ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := hcong
refine ⟨-n, -x, sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 ?_⟩
have : (hζ.pow_of_coprime 2 (by decide)).toInteger = hζ.toInteger ^ 2 := by ext; simp
simp only [this, PNat.val_ofNat, Nat.cast_ofNat, mul_neg, Int.cast_neg, ← neg_add, ←
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.1 hx, Units.val_neg, val_pow_eq_pow_val, IsUnit.unit_spec, neg_neg]
variable (x : 𝓞 K)
/-- Let `(x : 𝓞 K)`. Then we have that `λ` divides one amongst `x`, `x - 1` and `x + 1`. -/
lemma lambda_dvd_or_dvd_sub_one_or_dvd_add_one [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] :
λ ∣ x ∨ λ ∣ x - 1 ∨ λ ∣ x + 1 := by
classical
have := hζ.finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one (by decide)
let _ := Fintype.ofFinite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {λ})
let _ : Ring (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {λ}) := CommRing.toRing -- to speed up instance synthesis
let _ : AddGroup (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {λ}) := AddGroupWithOne.toAddGroup -- ditto
have := Finset.mem_univ (Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {λ}) x)
have h3 : Fintype.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {λ}) = 3 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, hζ.card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one,
hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)]
simp only [PNat.val_ofNat, Nat.cast_ofNat, Int.reduceAbs]
rw [Finset.univ_of_card_le_three h3.le] at this
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton] at this
rcases this with h | h | h
· left
exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.1 h
· right; left
refine Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.1 ?_
rw [RingHom.map_sub, h, RingHom.map_one, sub_self]
· right; right
| refine Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 <| Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.1 ?_
rw [RingHom.map_add, h, RingHom.map_one, neg_add_cancel]
/-- We have that `η ^ 2 + η + 1 = 0`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Three.lean | 146 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
| @[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 103 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
| /-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 187 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring
in `n` variables. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'' :
FiniteType R S ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial']
rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
exact ⟨Fintype.card ι, AlgHom.comp f equiv.symm.toAlgHom, by simpa using hsur⟩
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R (Fin n)) f hsur
instance prod [hA : FiniteType R A] [hB : FiniteType R B] : FiniteType R (A × B) :=
⟨by rw [← Subalgebra.prod_top]; exact hA.1.prod hB.1⟩
theorem isNoetherianRing (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] [IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing S := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h.1
apply
isNoetherianRing_of_surjective (MvPolynomial s R) S
(MvPolynomial.aeval (↑) : MvPolynomial s R →ₐ[R] S).toRingHom
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, ← AlgHom.coe_range,
← Algebra.adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]
rfl
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_iff_finiteType (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R S :=
S.fg_top.symm.trans ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.out⟩
end FiniteType
end Algebra
end ModuleAndAlgebra
namespace RingHom
variable {A B C : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
/-- A ring morphism `A →+* B` is of `FiniteType` if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
@[algebraize]
def FiniteType (f : A →+* B) : Prop :=
@Algebra.FiniteType A B _ _ f.toAlgebra
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (A) in
theorem id : FiniteType (RingHom.id A) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.self A
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_surjective hf
{ g with
toFun := g
commutes' := fun a => rfl }
hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →+* B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType := by
rw [← f.comp_id]
exact (id A).comp_surjective hf
theorem comp {g : B →+* C} {f : A →+* B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.trans hf hg
theorem of_finite {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : f.FiniteType :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
alias _root_.RingHom.Finite.to_finiteType := of_finite
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType := by
algebraize [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_restrictScalars_finiteType A B C
end FiniteType
end RingHom
namespace AlgHom
variable {R A B C : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C]
/-- An algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] B` is of `FiniteType` if it is of finite type as ring morphism.
In other words, if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
def FiniteType (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Prop :=
f.toRingHom.FiniteType
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
RingHom.Finite.finiteType hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (R A)
theorem id : FiniteType (AlgHom.id R A) :=
RingHom.FiniteType.id A
variable {R A}
theorem comp {g : B →ₐ[R] C} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp hg hf
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp_surjective hf hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_surjective f.toRingHom hf
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_comp_finiteType h
end FiniteType
end AlgHom
theorem algebraMap_finiteType_iff_algebra_finiteType {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] : (algebraMap R A).FiniteType ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R A := by
dsimp [RingHom.FiniteType]
constructor <;> (intro h; convert h; apply Algebra.algebra_ext; exact congrFun rfl)
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
open Algebra AddSubmonoid Submodule
section Span
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- An element of `R[M]` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_adjoin_support (f : R[M]) : f ∈ adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support) := by
suffices span R (of' R M '' f.support) ≤
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support)) by
exact this (mem_span_support f)
rw [Submodule.span_le]
exact subset_adjoin
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the set of supports of
elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
refine le_antisymm le_top ?_
rw [← hS, adjoin_le_iff]
intro f hf
have hincl :
of' R M '' f.support ⊆ ⋃ (g : R[M]) (_ : g ∈ S), of' R M '' g.support := by
intro s hs
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨f, ⟨hf, hs⟩⟩
exact adjoin_mono hincl (mem_adjoin_support f)
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the image of the union of
the supports of elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen' {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
suffices (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M) by
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen hS
simp only [Set.image_iUnion]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- If `R[M]` is of finite type, then there is a `G : Finset M` such that its
image generates, as algebra, `R[M]`. -/
theorem exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top [h : FiniteType R R[M]] :
∃ G : Finset M, Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' G) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h
letI : DecidableEq M := Classical.decEq M
use Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support
have : (Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support : Set M) = ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M) := by
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen' hS
/-- The image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
`S : Set M` if and only if `m ∈ S`. -/
| theorem of'_mem_span [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M} :
of' R M m ∈ span R (of' R M '' S) ↔ m ∈ S := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Submodule.subset_span <| Set.mem_image_of_mem (of R M) h⟩
unfold of' at h
rw [← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported,
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' R)] at h
simpa using h
/--
If the image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 379 | 388 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.LanguageMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Syntax
This file defines first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories in a style inspired by the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Term` is defined so that `L.Term α` is the type of `L`-terms with free
variables indexed by `α`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Formula` is defined so that `L.Formula α` is the type of `L`-formulas with
free variables indexed by `α`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence` is a formula with no free variables.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Theory` is a set of sentences.
- The variables of terms and formulas can be relabelled with `FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel`,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel`, and `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.relabel`.
- Given an operation on terms and an operation on relations,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel` gives an operation on formulas.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE` adds more `Fin`-indexed variables.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt` raises the indexes of the `Fin`-indexed variables
above a particular index.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst` and `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.subst` substitute
variables with given terms.
- Language maps can act on syntactic objects with functions such as
`FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onFormula`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv` and
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv` switch terms and formulas between having
constants in the language and having extra variables indexed by the same type.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable (L : Language.{u, v}) {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder
open Structure Fin
/-- A term on `α` is either a variable indexed by an element of `α`
or a function symbol applied to simpler terms. -/
inductive Term (α : Type u') : Type max u u'
| var : α → Term α
| func : ∀ {l : ℕ} (_f : L.Functions l) (_ts : Fin l → Term α), Term α
export Term (var func)
variable {L}
namespace Term
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [∀ n, DecidableEq (L.Functions n)] : DecidableEq (L.Term α)
| .var a, .var b => decidable_of_iff (a = b) <| by simp
| @Term.func _ _ m f xs, @Term.func _ _ n g ys =>
if h : m = n then
letI : DecidableEq (L.Term α) := instDecidableEq
decidable_of_iff (f = h ▸ g ∧ ∀ i : Fin m, xs i = ys (Fin.cast h i)) <| by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
else
.isFalse <| by simp [h]
| .var _, .func _ _ | .func _ _, .var _ => .isFalse <| by simp
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinset [DecidableEq α] : L.Term α → Finset α
| var i => {i}
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinset
/-- The `Finset` of variables from the left side of a sum used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinsetLeft [DecidableEq α] : L.Term (α ⊕ β) → Finset α
| var (Sum.inl i) => {i}
| var (Sum.inr _i) => ∅
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a particular function. -/
@[simp]
def relabel (g : α → β) : L.Term α → L.Term β
| var i => var (g i)
| func f ts => func f fun {i} => (ts i).relabel g
theorem relabel_id (t : L.Term α) : t.relabel id = t := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_id_eq_id : (Term.relabel id : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id :=
funext relabel_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (t : L.Term α) :
(t.relabel f).relabel g = t.relabel (g ∘ f) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_comp_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
(Term.relabel g ∘ Term.relabel f : L.Term α → L.Term γ) = Term.relabel (g ∘ f) :=
funext (relabel_relabel f g)
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a bijection. -/
@[simps]
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) : L.Term α ≃ L.Term β :=
⟨relabel g, relabel g.symm, fun t => by simp, fun t => by simp⟩
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables. -/
def restrictVar [DecidableEq α] : ∀ (t : L.Term α) (_f : t.varFinset → β), L.Term β
| var a, f => var (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i => (ts i).restrictVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => varFinset (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables on the left side of a sum. -/
def restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} :
∀ (t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)) (_f : t.varFinsetLeft → β), L.Term (β ⊕ γ)
| var (Sum.inl a), f => var (Sum.inl (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩))
| var (Sum.inr a), _f => var (Sum.inr a)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i =>
(ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion (subset_biUnion_of_mem
(fun i => varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
end Term
/-- The representation of a constant symbol as a term. -/
def Constants.term (c : L.Constants) : L.Term α :=
func c default
/-- Applies a unary function to a term. -/
def Functions.apply₁ (f : L.Functions 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t]
/-- Applies a binary function to two terms. -/
def Functions.apply₂ (f : L.Functions 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t₁, t₂]
namespace Term
/-- Sends a term with constants to a term with extra variables. -/
@[simp]
def constantsToVars : L[[γ]].Term α → L.Term (γ ⊕ α)
| var a => var (Sum.inr a)
| @func _ _ 0 f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => var (Sum.inl c)
| @func _ _ (_n + 1) f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => isEmptyElim c
/-- Sends a term with extra variables to a term with constants. -/
@[simp]
def varsToConstants : L.Term (γ ⊕ α) → L[[γ]].Term α
| var (Sum.inr a) => var a
| var (Sum.inl c) => Constants.term (Sum.inr c)
| func f ts => func (Sum.inl f) fun i => (ts i).varsToConstants
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
@[simps]
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].Term α ≃ L.Term (γ ⊕ α) :=
⟨constantsToVars, varsToConstants, by
intro t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| @func n f _ ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, Constants.term, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· obtain - | f := f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· exact isEmptyElim f, by
intro t
induction t with
| var x => cases x <;> rfl
| @func n f _ ih => cases n <;> · simp [varsToConstants, constantsToVars, ih]⟩
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquivLeft : L[[γ]].Term (α ⊕ β) ≃ L.Term ((γ ⊕ α) ⊕ β) :=
constantsVarsEquiv.trans (relabelEquiv (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)).symm
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply (t : L[[γ]].Term (α ⊕ β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft t = (constantsToVars t).relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply (t : L.Term ((γ ⊕ α) ⊕ β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft.symm t = varsToConstants (t.relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)) :=
rfl
instance inhabitedOfVar [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨var default⟩
instance inhabitedOfConstant [Inhabited L.Constants] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨(default : L.Constants).term⟩
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a term greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt {n : ℕ} (n' m : ℕ) : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin (n + n'))) :=
relabel (Sum.map id fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n')
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given term with terms. -/
@[simp]
def subst : L.Term α → (α → L.Term β) → L.Term β
| var a, tf => tf a
| func f ts, tf => func f fun i => (ts i).subst tf
end Term
/-- `&n` is notation for the `n`-th free variable of a bounded formula. -/
scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:arg "&" => FirstOrder.Language.Term.var ∘ Sum.inr
namespace LHom
open Term
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language map. -/
@[simp]
def onTerm (φ : L →ᴸ L') : L.Term α → L'.Term α
| var i => var i
| func f ts => func (φ.onFunction f) fun i => onTerm φ (ts i)
@[simp]
theorem id_onTerm : ((LHom.id L).onTerm : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id := by
ext t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp_rw [onTerm, ih]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_onTerm {L'' : Language} (φ : L' →ᴸ L'') (ψ : L →ᴸ L') :
((φ.comp ψ).onTerm : L.Term α → L''.Term α) = φ.onTerm ∘ ψ.onTerm := by
ext t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp_rw [onTerm, ih]; rfl
end LHom
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def LEquiv.onTerm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Term α ≃ L'.Term α where
toFun := φ.toLHom.onTerm
invFun := φ.invLHom.onTerm
left_inv := by
rw [Function.leftInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.left_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
right_inv := by
rw [Function.rightInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.right_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. Deprecated in favor of `LEquiv.onTerm`. -/
@[deprecated LEquiv.onTerm (since := "2025-03-31")] alias Lequiv.onTerm := LEquiv.onTerm
variable (L) (α)
/-- `BoundedFormula α n` is the type of formulas with free variables indexed by `α` and up to `n`
additional free variables. -/
inductive BoundedFormula : ℕ → Type max u v u'
| falsum {n} : BoundedFormula n
| equal {n} (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| rel {n l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations l) (ts : Fin l → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
/-- The implication between two bounded formulas -/
| imp {n} (f₁ f₂ : BoundedFormula n) : BoundedFormula n
/-- The universal quantifier over bounded formulas -/
| all {n} (f : BoundedFormula (n + 1)) : BoundedFormula n
/-- `Formula α` is the type of formulas with all free variables indexed by `α`. -/
abbrev Formula :=
L.BoundedFormula α 0
/-- A sentence is a formula with no free variables. -/
abbrev Sentence :=
L.Formula Empty
/-- A theory is a set of sentences. -/
abbrev Theory :=
Set L.Sentence
variable {L} {α} {n : ℕ}
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula {l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
L.BoundedFormula α l :=
BoundedFormula.rel R ts
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t]
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t₁, t₂]
/-- The equality of two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Term.bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
BoundedFormula.equal t₁ t₂
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.formula (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
R.boundedFormula fun i => (ts i).relabel Sum.inl
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t]
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t₁, t₂]
/-- The equality of two terms as a first-order formula. -/
def Term.equal (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
(t₁.relabel Sum.inl).bdEqual (t₂.relabel Sum.inl)
namespace BoundedFormula
instance : Inhabited (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
instance : Bot (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
/-- The negation of a bounded formula is also a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def not (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.imp ⊥
/-- Puts an `∃` quantifier on a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.not.all.not
instance : Top (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨BoundedFormula.not ⊥⟩
instance : Min (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.imp g.not).not⟩
instance : Max (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => f.not.imp g⟩
/-- The biimplication between two bounded formulas. -/
protected def iff (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
φ.imp ψ ⊓ ψ.imp φ
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given formula. -/
@[simp]
def freeVarFinset [DecidableEq α] : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → Finset α
| _n, falsum => ∅
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.varFinsetLeft ∪ t₂.varFinsetLeft
| _n, rel _R ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
| _n, imp f₁ f₂ => f₁.freeVarFinset ∪ f₂.freeVarFinset
| _n, all f => f.freeVarFinset
/-- Casts `L.BoundedFormula α m` as `L.BoundedFormula α n`, where `m ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
def castLE : ∀ {m n : ℕ} (_h : m ≤ n), L.BoundedFormula α m → L.BoundedFormula α n
| _m, _n, _h, falsum => falsum
| _m, _n, h, equal t₁ t₂ =>
equal (t₁.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h))) (t₂.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)))
| _m, _n, h, rel R ts => rel R (Term.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)) ∘ ts)
| _m, _n, h, imp f₁ f₂ => (f₁.castLE h).imp (f₂.castLE h)
| _m, _n, h, all f => (f.castLE (add_le_add_right h 1)).all
@[simp]
theorem castLE_rfl {n} (h : n ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : φ.castLE h = φ := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
| rel => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem castLE_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.castLE km).castLE mn = φ.castLE (km.trans mn) := by
revert m n
induction φ with
| falsum => intros; rfl
| equal => simp
| rel =>
intros
simp only [castLE, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, Term.relabel_comp_relabel]
simp
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => intros; simp only [castLE, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem castLE_comp_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) :
(BoundedFormula.castLE mn ∘ BoundedFormula.castLE km :
L.BoundedFormula α k → L.BoundedFormula α n) =
BoundedFormula.castLE (km.trans mn) :=
funext (castLE_castLE km mn)
/-- Restricts a bounded formula to only use a particular set of free variables. -/
def restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] :
∀ {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (_f : φ.freeVarFinset → β), L.BoundedFormula β n
| _n, falsum, _f => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂, f =>
equal (t₁.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left))
(t₂.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, rel R ts, f =>
rel R fun i => (ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => Term.varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂, f =>
(φ₁.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left)).imp
(φ₂.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, all φ, f => (φ.restrictFreeVar f).all
/-- Places universal quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def alls : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.all.alls
/-- Places existential quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def exs : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.ex.exs
/-- Maps bounded formulas along a map of terms and a map of relations. -/
def mapTermRel {g : ℕ → ℕ} (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (g n))))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(h : ∀ n, L'.BoundedFormula β (g (n + 1)) → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n + 1)) :
∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n)
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => equal (ft _ t₁) (ft _ t₂)
| _n, rel R ts => rel (fr _ R) fun i => ft _ (ts i)
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => (φ₁.mapTermRel ft fr h).imp (φ₂.mapTermRel ft fr h)
| n, all φ => (h n (φ.mapTermRel ft fr h)).all
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a formula greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt : ∀ {n : ℕ} (n' _m : ℕ), L.BoundedFormula α n → L.BoundedFormula α (n + n') :=
fun {_} n' m φ =>
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.liftAt n' m) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc])
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_mapTermRel {L'' : Language}
(ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(ft' : ∀ n, L'.Term (β ⊕ Fin n) → L''.Term (γ ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr' : ∀ n, L'.Relations n → L''.Relations n) {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
((φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).mapTermRel ft' fr' fun _ => id) =
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => ft' _ ∘ ft _) (fun _ => fr' _ ∘ fr _) fun _ => id := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_id_id_id {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => id) (fun _ => id) fun _ => id) = φ := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
/-- An equivalence of bounded formulas given by an equivalence of terms and an equivalence of
relations. -/
@[simps]
def mapTermRelEquiv (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) ≃ L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n ≃ L'.Relations n) {n} : L.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L'.BoundedFormula β n :=
⟨mapTermRel (fun n => ft n) (fun n => fr n) fun _ => id,
mapTermRel (fun n => (ft n).symm) (fun n => (fr n).symm) fun _ => id, fun φ => by simp, fun φ =>
by simp⟩
/-- A function to help relabel the variables in bounded formulas. -/
def relabelAux (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) (k : ℕ) : α ⊕ (Fin k) → β ⊕ (Fin (n + k)) :=
Sum.map id finSumFinEquiv ∘ Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _ ∘ Sum.map g id
@[simp]
theorem sumElim_comp_relabelAux {m : ℕ} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (n + m) → M} : Sum.elim v xs ∘ relabelAux g m =
Sum.elim (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ castAdd m) ∘ g) (xs ∘ natAdd n) := by
ext x
rcases x with x | x
· simp only [BoundedFormula.relabelAux, Function.comp_apply, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
rcases g x with l | r <;> simp
· simp [BoundedFormula.relabelAux]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_elim_comp_relabelAux := sumElim_comp_relabelAux
@[simp]
theorem relabelAux_sumInl (k : ℕ) :
relabelAux (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ (Fin n)) k = Sum.map id (natAdd n) := by
ext x
cases x <;> · simp [relabelAux]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias relabelAux_sum_inl := relabelAux_sumInl
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's variables along a particular function. -/
def relabel (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) : L.BoundedFormula β (n + k) :=
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.relabel (relabelAux g _)) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (ge_of_eq (add_assoc _ _ _))
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's free variables along a bijection. -/
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) {k} : L.BoundedFormula α k ≃ L.BoundedFormula β k :=
mapTermRelEquiv (fun _n => Term.relabelEquiv (g.sumCongr (_root_.Equiv.refl _)))
fun _n => _root_.Equiv.refl _
@[simp]
theorem relabel_falsum (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} :
(falsum : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = falsum :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_bot (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_imp (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.imp ψ).relabel g = (φ.relabel g).imp (ψ.relabel g) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_not (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
φ.not.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).not := by simp [BoundedFormula.not]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_all (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (k + 1)) :
φ.all.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).all := by
rw [relabel, mapTermRel, relabel]
simp
@[simp]
theorem relabel_ex (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (k + 1)) :
φ.ex.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).ex := by simp [BoundedFormula.ex]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_sumInl (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.relabel Sum.inl : L.BoundedFormula α (0 + n)) = φ.castLE (ge_of_eq (zero_add n)) := by
simp only [relabel, relabelAux_sumInl]
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [Fin.natAdd_zero, castLE_of_eq, mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [Fin.natAdd_zero, castLE_of_eq, mapTermRel]; rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp_all [mapTermRel]
| all _ ih3 => simp_all [mapTermRel]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias relabel_sum_inl := relabel_sumInl
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given formula with terms. -/
def subst {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (f : α → L.Term β) : L.BoundedFormula β n :=
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.subst (Sum.elim (Term.relabel Sum.inl ∘ f) (var ∘ Sum.inr)))
(fun _ => id) fun _ => id
/-- A bijection sending formulas with constants to formulas with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].BoundedFormula α n ≃ L.BoundedFormula (γ ⊕ α) n :=
mapTermRelEquiv (fun _ => Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun _ => Equiv.sumEmpty _ _
/-- Turns the extra variables of a bounded formula into free variables. -/
@[simp]
def toFormula : ∀ {n : ℕ}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula (α ⊕ (Fin n))
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.equal t₂
| _n, rel R ts => R.formula ts
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => φ₁.toFormula.imp φ₂.toFormula
| _n, all φ =>
(φ.toFormula.relabel
(Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inl) (Sum.map Sum.inr id ∘ finSumFinEquiv.symm))).all
/-- Take the disjunction of a finite set of formulas -/
noncomputable def iSup [Finite β] (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
let _ := Fintype.ofFinite β
((Finset.univ : Finset β).toList.map f).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥
/-- Take the conjunction of a finite set of formulas -/
noncomputable def iInf [Finite β] (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
let _ := Fintype.ofFinite β
((Finset.univ : Finset β).toList.map f).foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤
end BoundedFormula
| namespace LHom
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Syntax.lean | 613 | 614 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `LinearMap.toMatrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `Matrix κ ι R`
* `Matrix.toLin`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`
to `Matrix m n R` (with the standard basis on `m → R` and `n → R`)
* `Matrix.toLin'`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix'`
* `algEquivMatrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `Matrix n n R`
## Issues
This file was originally written without attention to non-commutative rings,
and so mostly only works in the commutative setting. This should be fixed.
In particular, `Matrix.mulVec` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R)`
while `Matrix.vecMul` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`.
At present, the first equivalence is developed in detail but only for commutative rings
(and we omit the distinction between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`),
while the second equivalence is developed only in brief, but for not-necessarily-commutative rings.
Naming is slightly inconsistent between the two developments.
In the original (commutative) development `linear` is abbreviated to `lin`,
although this is not consistent with the rest of mathlib.
In the new (non-commutative) development `linear` is not abbreviated, and declarations use `_right`
to indicate they use the right action of matrices on vectors (via `Matrix.vecMul`).
When the two developments are made uniform, the names should be made uniform, too,
by choosing between `linear` and `lin` consistently,
and (presumably) adding `_left` where necessary.
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.vecMul M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m]
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M.row) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_single, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.single, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, row_def]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [Ring R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R M.row := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply, row_def]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [Ring R] {A : Matrix m m R}
[DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) : LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [← Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.vecMul_injective_of_isUnit ha
section
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- Linear maps `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Matrix m n R`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication.
-/
def LinearMap.toMatrixRight' : ((m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] Matrix m n R where
toFun f i j := f (single R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1) j
invFun := Matrix.vecMulLinear
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R m).ext
intro j; ext i
simp
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to a linear map `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication. -/
abbrev Matrix.toLinearMapRight' [DecidableEq m] : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : m → R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight') M v = v ᵥ* M := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) =
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N).comp (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _x ↦ (vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) (x) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) x =
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M x) :=
(vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (1 : Matrix m m R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp [Module.End.one_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `n → A`
and `m → A` corresponding to `M.vecMul` and `M'.vecMul`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinearEquivRight'OfInv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n R}
{M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] m → R :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrixRight'.symm M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply] }
end
end ToMatrixRight
/-!
From this point on, we only work with commutative rings,
and fail to distinguish between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`.
This should eventually be remedied.
-/
section mulVec
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.mulVec M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R where
toFun := M.mulVec
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_add _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_smul _ _ _
theorem Matrix.coe_mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.mulVecLin : _ → _) = M.mulVec := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_apply [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
M.mulVecLin v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_zero [Fintype n] : Matrix.mulVecLin (0 : Matrix m n R) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext zero_mulVec
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_add [Fintype n] (M N : Matrix m n R) :
(M + N).mulVecLin = M.mulVecLin + N.mulVecLin :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ add_mulVec _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_transpose [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.mulVecLin = M.vecMulLinear := by
ext; simp [mulVec_transpose]
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_transpose [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.vecMulLinear = M.mulVecLin := by
ext; simp [vecMul_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(M.submatrix f₁ e₂).mulVecLin = funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ submatrix_mulVec_equiv _ _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(reindex e₁ e₂ M).mulVecLin =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ
M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ ↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_one [DecidableEq n] :
Matrix.mulVecLin (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext; simp [Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_mul [Fintype m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.mulVecLin (M * N) = (Matrix.mulVecLin M).comp (Matrix.mulVecLin N) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ (mulVec_mulVec _ _ _).symm
theorem Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix m n R} :
(LinearMap.ker M.mulVecLin) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 := by
simp only [Submodule.eq_bot_iff, LinearMap.mem_ker, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply]
theorem Matrix.range_mulVecLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.mulVecLin = span R (range M.col) := by
rw [← vecMulLinear_transpose, range_vecMulLinear, row_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.mulVec ↔ LinearIndependent R M.col := by
change Function.Injective (fun x ↦ _) ↔ _
simp_rw [← M.vecMul_transpose, vecMul_injective_iff, row_transpose]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_cols_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Fintype m]
{A : Matrix m m R} [DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) :
LinearIndependent R A.col := by
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.mulVec_injective_of_isUnit ha
end mulVec
section ToMatrix'
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `Matrix m n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R where
toFun f := of fun i j ↦ f (Pi.single j 1) i
invFun := Matrix.mulVecLin
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.mulVec_single_one, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R n).ext
intro j; ext i
simp only [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single_one,
Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, of_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, of_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`.
Note that the forward-direction does not require `DecidableEq` and is `Matrix.vecMulLin`. -/
def Matrix.toLin' : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply' (M : Matrix m n R) : Matrix.toLin' M = M.mulVecLin :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_symm :
(Matrix.toLin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) : LinearMap.toMatrix' (Matrix.toLin' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, of_apply]
congr! with i
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, Pi.single_eq_same]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) : Matrix.toLin' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_one : Matrix.toLin' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_id : LinearMap.toMatrix' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 := by
ext
rw [Matrix.one_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply, id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_one : LinearMap.toMatrix' (1 : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M * N) = (Matrix.toLin' M).comp (Matrix.toLin' N) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_submatrix [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M.submatrix f₁ e₂) =
funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.toLin'_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_reindex [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (reindex e₁ e₂ M) =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex _ _ _
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin'_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply` -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin' (M * N) x = Matrix.toLin' M (Matrix.toLin' N x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, LinearMap.comp_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R)
(g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f.comp g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g := by
suffices f.comp g = Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g) by
rw [this, LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin']
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix', Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix']
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp f g
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (algebraMap R (Module.End R (n → R)) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem Matrix.ker_toLin'_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 :=
Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff
theorem Matrix.range_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range (Matrix.toLin' M) = span R (range M.col) :=
Matrix.range_mulVecLin _
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `m → A`
and `n → A` corresponding to `M.mulVec` and `M'.mulVec`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLin'OfInv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R :=
{ Matrix.toLin' M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLin' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLin' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply] }
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `Matrix n n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv LinearMap.toMatrix' LinearMap.toMatrix'_one LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul
/-- A `Matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_toLinAlgEquiv' (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv']
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_apply (M : Matrix n n R) (v : n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_one : Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.toLin'_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_id :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp _ _
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_mul (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f * g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp f g
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
section Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Finite m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂` and matrices over `R` indexed by the bases. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R :=
LinearEquiv.trans (LinearEquiv.arrowCongr v₁.equivFun v₂.equivFun) LinearMap.toMatrix'
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix'` is a particular case of `LinearMap.toMatrix`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_eq_toMatrix' :
LinearMap.toMatrix (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R n) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between matrices over `R` indexed by the bases and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂`. -/
def Matrix.toLin : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm
/-- `Matrix.toLin'` is a particular case of `Matrix.toLin`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_eq_toLin' : Matrix.toLin (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_symm : (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm = Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_symm : (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂).symm = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_toMatrix (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f) = f := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M) = M := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply,
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, Basis.equivFun_symm_apply, Finset.sum_eq_single j, if_pos rfl,
one_smul, Basis.equivFun_apply]
· intro j' _ hj'
rw [if_neg hj', zero_smul]
· intro hj
have := Finset.mem_univ j
contradiction
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext fun i ↦ f.toMatrix_apply _ _ i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_apply v₁ v₂ f i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply v₁ v₂ f j
/-- This will be a special case of `LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_id : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ id = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_one : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ 1 = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁
@[simp]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_singleton {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] (f : R →ₗ[R] R) (i j : ι) :
f.toMatrix (.singleton ι R) (.singleton ι R) i j = f 1 := by
simp [toMatrix, Subsingleton.elim j default]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_one : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₁ 1 = LinearMap.id := by
rw [← LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁, Matrix.toLin_toMatrix]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_reindexRange [DecidableEq M₁] (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (k : m) (i : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁.reindexRange v₂.reindexRange f ⟨v₂ k, Set.mem_range_self k⟩
⟨v₁ i, Set.mem_range_self i⟩ =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f k i := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Basis.reindexRange_self, Basis.reindexRange_repr]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M₁) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, LinearMap.toMatrix_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mulVec_repr (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f *ᵥ v₁.repr x = v₂.repr (f x) := by
ext i
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix',
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, v₂.equivFun_apply]
congr
exact v₁.equivFun.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_basis_equiv [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (b : Basis l R M₁)
(b' : Basis l R M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix b' b (b'.equiv b (Equiv.refl l) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₁) = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_left {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₁]
[SMulCommClass G R M₁] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix (g • v₁) v₂ f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (f ∘ₗ DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_right {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₂]
[SMulCommClass G R M₂] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ (g • v₂) f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g⁻¹ ∘ₗ f) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
end Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
theorem Matrix.toLin_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : M₁) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M v = ∑ j, (M *ᵥ v₁.repr v) j • v₂ j :=
show v₂.equivFun.symm (Matrix.toLin' M (v₁.repr v)) = _ by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_apply, v₂.equivFun_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_self (M : Matrix m n R) (i : n) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₂ j := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_apply, Finset.sum_congr rfl fun j _hj ↦ ?_]
rw [Basis.repr_self, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct, Finset.sum_eq_single i, Finsupp.single_eq_same,
mul_one]
· intro i' _ i'_ne
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne i'_ne.symm, mul_zero]
· intros
have := Finset.mem_univ i
contradiction
variable {M₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (v₃ : Basis l R M₃)
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_comp [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃ (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₂ v₃ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ g := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_comp _ v₂.equivFun,
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ g := by
rw [Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_pow (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k : ℕ) :
(toMatrix v₁ v₁ f) ^ k = toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ih, ← toMatrix_mul]
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A).comp (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B) := by
apply (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃).injective
haveI : DecidableEq l := fun _ _ ↦ Classical.propDecidable _
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₂ v₃]
repeat' rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin]
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul_apply [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) x = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A) (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_mul v₁ v₂, LinearMap.comp_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M` are each other's inverse matrices, `Matrix.toLin M` and `Matrix.toLin M'`
form a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinOfInv [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1)
(hM'M : M' * M = 1) : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M with
toFun := Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M
invFun := Matrix.toLin v₂ v₁ M'
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply] }
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁` and square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_one v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_mul v₁)
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁).symm = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_toMatrixAlgEquiv (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f) = f := by
rw [← Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_toLinAlgEquiv (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ M) = M := by
rw [← Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm, AlgEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext fun i ↦ f.toMatrix_apply _ _ i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply v₁ f i j
|
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply v₁ f j
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_apply (M : Matrix n n R) (v : M₁) :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 712 | 717 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
| theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 383 | 384 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,015 | 1,017 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
theorem arccos_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arccos x = 0 := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_one_le hx, sub_self]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 358 | 358 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (k * i) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (i * k) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (k * j) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (j * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a m = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_left {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd m = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right a m n
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a n = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_right {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd n = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right a n m
theorem gcd_eq_left {i j : ℤ} (H : i ∣ j) : gcd i j = natAbs i :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H))
theorem gcd_eq_right {i j : ℤ} (H : j ∣ i) : gcd i j = natAbs j := by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
theorem ne_zero_of_gcd {x y : ℤ} (hc : gcd x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
rw [hc.left, hc.right, gcd_zero_right, natAbs_zero]
theorem exists_gcd_one {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n' : ℤ, gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd H, (Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_left).symm,
(Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_right).symm⟩
theorem exists_gcd_one' {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ (g : ℕ) (m' n' : ℤ), 0 < g ∧ gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_gcd_one H
⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {m n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) : m ^ k ∣ n ^ k ↔ m ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rwa [← natAbs_dvd_natAbs, ← Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff k0, ← Int.natAbs_pow, ← Int.natAbs_pow,
natAbs_dvd_natAbs]
theorem gcd_dvd_iff {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : gcd a b ∣ n ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, Int.ofNat_mul, gcd_eq_gcd_ab, Int.add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, h]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_left _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right y)
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℤ} (hd_pos : 0 ≤ d) (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℤ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = gcd a b :=
dvd_antisymm hd_pos (ofNat_zero_le (gcd a b)) (dvd_coe_gcd hda hdb)
(hd _ gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a c = 1` then `a ∣ b`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a c = 1) :
a ∣ b := by
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab a c
simp only [hab, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add] at this
have : b * a * gcdA a c + b * c * gcdB a c = b := by simp [mul_assoc, ← Int.mul_add, ← this]
rw [← this]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left a b) _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left habc _)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a b = 1` then `a ∣ c`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a b = 1) :
a ∣ c := by
rw [mul_comm] at habc
exact dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one habc hab
/-- For nonzero integers `a` and `b`, `gcd a b` is the smallest positive natural number that can be
written in the form `a * x + b * y` for some pair of integers `x` and `y` -/
theorem gcd_least_linear {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsLeast { n : ℕ | 0 < n ∧ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y } (a.gcd b) := by
simp_rw [← gcd_dvd_iff]
constructor
· simpa [and_true, dvd_refl, Set.mem_setOf_eq] using gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left b ha
· simp only [lowerBounds, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun n hn_pos hn => Nat.le_of_dvd hn_pos hn
/-! ### lcm -/
theorem lcm_comm (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = lcm j i := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm]
exact Nat.lcm_comm _ _
theorem lcm_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : lcm (lcm i j) k = lcm i (lcm j k) := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]
apply Nat.lcm_assoc
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 0 i = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 0 = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 1 i = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 1 = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_right
theorem coe_lcm_dvd {i j k : ℤ} : i ∣ k → j ∣ k → (lcm i j : ℤ) ∣ k := by
rw [Int.lcm]
intro hi hj
exact natCast_dvd.mpr (Nat.lcm_dvd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hi) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hj))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias lcm_dvd := coe_lcm_dvd
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = natAbs m * n.lcm k := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * natAbs n := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_right]
end Int
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_gcd_eq_one {M : Type*} [Monoid M] (x : M) {m n : ℕ} (hm : x ^ m = 1) (hn : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m.gcd n = 1 := by
rcases m with (rfl | m); · simp [hn]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := IsUnit.of_pow_eq_one hm m.succ_ne_zero
rw [← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, ← Units.val_one (α := M), ← zpow_natCast, ← Units.ext_iff] at *
rw [Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, hn, hm, one_zpow, one_zpow, one_mul]
variable {α : Type*}
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
protected lemma Commute.pow_eq_pow_iff_of_coprime (hab : Commute a b) (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
a ^ m = b ^ n ↔ ∃ c, a = c ^ n ∧ b = c ^ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩; rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul']⟩
by_cases m = 0; · aesop
by_cases n = 0; · aesop
by_cases hb : b = 0; · exact ⟨0, by aesop⟩
by_cases ha : a = 0; · exact ⟨0, by have := h.symm; aesop⟩
refine ⟨a ^ Nat.gcdB m n * b ^ Nat.gcdA m n, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· refine (pow_one _).symm.trans ?_
conv_lhs => rw [← zpow_natCast, ← hmn, Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab]
| simp only [zpow_add₀ ha, zpow_add₀ hb, ← zpow_natCast, (hab.zpow_zpow₀ _ _).mul_zpow,
← zpow_mul, mul_comm (Nat.gcdB m n), mul_comm (Nat.gcdA m n)]
simp only [zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, h]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 401 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ring
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Ultraproducts
If `φ` is an ultrafilter, then the space of germs of functions `f : α → β` at `φ` is called
the *ultraproduct*. In this file we prove properties of ultraproducts that rely on `φ` being an
ultrafilter. Definitions and properties that work for any filter should go to `Order.Filter.Germ`.
## Tags
ultrafilter, ultraproduct
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {φ : Ultrafilter α}
namespace Filter
local notation3 "∀* "(...)", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p (Ultrafilter.toFilter φ)) => r
namespace Germ
open Ultrafilter
local notation "β*" => Germ (φ : Filter α) β
instance instGroupWithZero [GroupWithZero β] : GroupWithZero β* where
__ := instDivInvMonoid
__ := instMonoidWithZero
mul_inv_cancel f := inductionOn f fun f hf ↦ coe_eq.2 <| (φ.em fun y ↦ f y = 0).elim
(fun H ↦ (hf <| coe_eq.2 H).elim) fun H ↦ H.mono fun _ ↦ mul_inv_cancel₀
inv_zero := coe_eq.2 <| by simp only [Function.comp_def, inv_zero, EventuallyEq.rfl]
instance instDivisionSemiring [DivisionSemiring β] : DivisionSemiring β* where
toSemiring := instSemiring
__ := instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
instance instDivisionRing [DivisionRing β] : DivisionRing β* where
__ := instRing
__ := instDivisionSemiring
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
instance instSemifield [Semifield β] : Semifield β* where
__ := instCommSemiring
__ := instDivisionSemiring
instance instField [Field β] : Field β* where
__ := instCommRing
__ := instDivisionRing
| theorem coe_lt [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} : (f : β*) < g ↔ ∀* x, f x < g x := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, eventually_and, coe_le, eventually_not, EventuallyLE]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/FilterProduct.lean | 65 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Paul Lezeau, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdjoinRoot
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.GaussLemma
/-!
# Minimal polynomials over a GCD monoid
This file specializes the theory of minpoly to the case of an algebra over a GCD monoid.
## Main results
* `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions`: For integrally closed domains, the minimal
polynomial over the ring is the same as the minimal polynomial over the fraction field.
* `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd` : For integrally closed domains, the minimal polynomial divides
any primitive polynomial that has the integral element as root.
* `IsIntegrallyClosed.Minpoly.unique` : The minimal polynomial of an element `x` is
uniquely characterized by its defining property: if there is another monic polynomial of minimal
degree that has `x` as a root, then this polynomial is equal to the minimal polynomial of `x`.
-/
open Polynomial Set Function minpoly
namespace minpoly
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [IsDomain R] [Algebra R S]
section
variable (K L : Type*) [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [CommRing L] [Nontrivial L]
[Algebra R L] [Algebra S L] [Algebra K L] [IsScalarTower R K L] [IsScalarTower R S L]
variable [IsIntegrallyClosed R]
/-- For integrally closed domains, the minimal polynomial over the ring is the same as the minimal
polynomial over the fraction field. See `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions'` if
`S` is already a `K`-algebra. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions [IsDomain S] {s : S} (hs : IsIntegral R s) :
minpoly K (algebraMap S L s) = (minpoly R s).map (algebraMap R K) := by
refine (eq_of_irreducible_of_monic ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· exact ((monic hs).irreducible_iff_irreducible_map_fraction_map).1 (irreducible hs)
· rw [aeval_map_algebraMap, aeval_algebraMap_apply, aeval, map_zero]
· exact (monic hs).map _
/-- For integrally closed domains, the minimal polynomial over the ring is the same as the minimal
polynomial over the fraction field. Compared to `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions`,
this version is useful if the element is in a ring that is already a `K`-algebra. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' [IsDomain S] [Algebra K S] [IsScalarTower R K S]
{s : S} (hs : IsIntegral R s) : minpoly K s = (minpoly R s).map (algebraMap R K) := by
let L := FractionRing S
rw [← isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions K L hs, algebraMap_eq (IsFractionRing.injective S L)]
end
variable [IsDomain S] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R S]
variable [IsIntegrallyClosed R]
/-- For integrally closed rings, the minimal polynomial divides any polynomial that has the
integral element as root. See also `minpoly.dvd` which relaxes the assumptions on `S`
in exchange for stronger assumptions on `R`. -/
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_dvd {s : S} (hs : IsIntegral R s) {p : R[X]}
(hp : Polynomial.aeval s p = 0) : minpoly R s ∣ p := by
let K := FractionRing R
let L := FractionRing S
let _ : Algebra K L := FractionRing.liftAlgebra R L
have := FractionRing.isScalarTower_liftAlgebra R L
have : minpoly K (algebraMap S L s) ∣ map (algebraMap R K) (p %ₘ minpoly R s) := by
rw [map_modByMonic _ (minpoly.monic hs), modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div]
· refine dvd_sub (minpoly.dvd K (algebraMap S L s) ?_) ?_
· rw [← map_aeval_eq_aeval_map, hp, map_zero]
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
rw [isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions K L hs]
exact Monic.map _ (minpoly.monic hs)
rw [isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions _ _ hs,
map_dvd_map (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K) (minpoly.monic hs)] at this
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (minpoly.monic hs)]
exact Polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt this (degree_modByMonic_lt p <| minpoly.monic hs)
theorem isIntegrallyClosed_dvd_iff {s : S} (hs : IsIntegral R s) (p : R[X]) :
Polynomial.aeval s p = 0 ↔ minpoly R s ∣ p :=
⟨fun hp => isIntegrallyClosed_dvd hs hp, fun hp => by
simpa only [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.coe_comp, coe_evalRingHom, coe_mapRingHom,
Function.comp_apply, eval_map, ← aeval_def] using
aeval_eq_zero_of_dvd_aeval_eq_zero hp (minpoly.aeval R s)⟩
theorem ker_eval {s : S} (hs : IsIntegral R s) :
| RingHom.ker ((Polynomial.aeval s).toRingHom : R[X] →+* S) =
Ideal.span ({minpoly R s} : Set R[X]) := by
ext p
simp_rw [RingHom.mem_ker, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom,
isIntegrallyClosed_dvd_iff hs, ← Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/IsIntegrallyClosed.lean | 95 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms. -/
@[stacks 0017]
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := rfl
theorem symm_bijective {X Y : C} : Function.Bijective (symm : (X ≅ Y) → _) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm_eq, symm_symm_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.hom = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_comp_inv, id_comp]
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : α.inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.hom :=
hom_comp_eq_id α.symm
theorem comp_inv_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ α.inv = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.hom :=
comp_hom_eq_id α.symm
theorem hom_eq_inv (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ X) : α.hom = β.inv ↔ β.hom = α.inv := by
rw [← symm_inv, inv_eq_inv α.symm β, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The bijection `(Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homToEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y) where
toFun f := f ≫ α.hom
invFun g := g ≫ α.inv
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homFromEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z) where
toFun f := α.inv ≫ f
invFun g := α.hom ≫ g
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
end Iso
/-- `IsIso` typeclass expressing that a morphism is invertible. -/
class IsIso (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- The existence of an inverse morphism. -/
out : ∃ inv : Y ⟶ X, f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X ∧ inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y
| /-- The inverse of a morphism `f` when we have `[IsIso f]`.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 232 | 233 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Exhaustion
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
/-!
# s-finite measures can be written as `withDensity` of a finite measure
If `μ` is an s-finite measure, then there exists a finite measure `μ.toFinite`
such that a set is `μ`-null iff it is `μ.toFinite`-null.
In particular, `MeasureTheory.ae μ.toFinite = MeasureTheory.ae μ` and `μ.toFinite = 0` iff `μ = 0`.
As a corollary, `μ` can be represented as `μ.toFinite.withDensity (μ.rnDeriv μ.toFinite)`.
Our definition of `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite` ensures some extra properties:
- if `μ` is a finite measure, then `μ.toFinite = μ[|univ] = (μ univ)⁻¹ • μ`;
- in particular, `μ.toFinite = μ` for a probability measure;
- if `μ ≠ 0`, then `μ.toFinite` is a probability measure.
## Main definitions
In these definitions and the results below, `μ` is an s-finite measure (`SFinite μ`).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`: a finite measure with `μ ≪ μ.toFinite` and `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
If `μ ≠ 0`, this is a probability measure.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.densityToFinite` (deprecated, use `MeasureTheory.Measure.rnDeriv`):
the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `μ.toFinite` with respect to `μ`.
## Main statements
* `absolutelyContinuous_toFinite`: `μ ≪ μ.toFinite`.
* `toFinite_absolutelyContinuous`: `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
* `ae_toFinite`: `ae μ.toFinite = ae μ`.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFiniteAux (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
letI := Classical.dec
if IsFiniteMeasure μ then μ else (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose
/-- A finite measure obtained from an s-finite measure `μ`, such that
`μ = μ.toFinite.withDensity μ.densityToFinite` (see `withDensity_densitytoFinite`).
If `μ` is non-zero, this is a probability measure. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
μ.toFiniteAux[|univ]
@[local simp]
lemma ae_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFiniteAux = ae μ := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· simp
· obtain ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec
exact h₂.ae_le.antisymm h₁.ae_le
@[local instance]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ.toFiniteAux := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec.1
@[simp]
lemma ae_toFinite [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFinite = ae μ := by
| simp [Measure.toFinite, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensityFinite.lean | 76 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
/-!
# Relating `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod (p ^ n)`, aka `ℤ/p^nℤ`.
In this file we establish connections between the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`
and the integers modulo powers of `p`, `ℤ/p^nℤ`, implemented as `ZMod (p^n)`.
## Main declarations
We show that `ℤ_[p]` has a ring homomorphism to `ℤ/p^nℤ` for each `n`.
The case for `n = 1` is handled separately, since it is used in the general construction
and we may want to use it without the `^1` getting in the way.
* `PadicInt.toZMod`: ring homomorphism to `ℤ/pℤ`, implemented as `ZMod p`.
* `PadicInt.toZModPow`: ring homomorphism to `ℤ/p^nℤ`, implemented as `ZMod (p^n)`.
* `PadicInt.ker_toZMod` / `PadicInt.ker_toZModPow`: the kernels of these maps are the ideals
generated by `p^n`
* `PadicInt.residueField` shows that the residue field of `ℤ_[p]` is isomorhic to ``ℤ/pℤ`.
We also establish the universal property of `ℤ_[p]` as a projective limit.
Given a family of compatible ring homomorphisms `f_k : R → ℤ/p^nℤ`,
there is a unique limit `R → ℤ_[p]`
* `PadicInt.lift`: the limit function
* `PadicInt.lift_spec` / `PadicInt.lift_unique`: the universal property
## Implementation notes
The constructions of the ring homomorphisms go through an auxiliary constructor
`PadicInt.toZModHom`, which removes some boilerplate code.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat IsLocalRing Padic
namespace PadicInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section RingHoms
/-! ### Ring homomorphisms to `ZMod p` and `ZMod (p ^ n)` -/
variable (p) (r : ℚ)
/-- `modPart p r` is an integer that satisfies
`‖(r - modPart p r : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1` when `‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1`,
see `PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart`.
It is the unique non-negative integer that is `< p` with this property.
(Note that this definition assumes `r : ℚ`.
See `PadicInt.zmodRepr` for a version that takes values in `ℕ`
and works for arbitrary `x : ℤ_[p]`.) -/
def modPart : ℤ :=
r.num * gcdA r.den p % p
variable {p}
theorem modPart_lt_p : modPart p r < p := by
convert Int.emod_lt_abs _ _
· simp
· exact mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
theorem modPart_nonneg : 0 ≤ modPart p r :=
Int.emod_nonneg _ <| mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
theorem isUnit_den (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : IsUnit (r.den : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [isUnit_iff]
apply le_antisymm (r.den : ℤ_[p]).2
rw [← not_lt, coe_natCast]
intro norm_denom_lt
have hr : ‖(r * r.den : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ := by
congr
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rw [padicNormE.mul] at hr
have key : ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
calc
_ = _ := hr.symm
_ < 1 * 1 := mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
_ = 1 := mul_one 1
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.den := by
simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padicInt]
exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one
rwa [← r.reduced.gcd_eq_one, Nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
theorem norm_sub_modPart_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.den.gcdA p % p * ↑r.den := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_mod, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_sub]
have := congr_arg (fun x => x % p : ℤ → ZMod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.den p)
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero, EuclideanDomain.mod_zero, Int.cast_add,
Int.cast_mul, zero_mul, add_zero] at this
push_cast
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← this]
suffices rdcp : r.den.Coprime p by
rw [rdcp.gcd_eq_one]
simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self]
apply Coprime.symm
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt]
apply ge_of_eq
rw [← isUnit_iff]
exact isUnit_den r h
theorem norm_sub_modPart (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - modPart p r : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
let n := modPart p r
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (isUnit_den r h).dvd_mul_right]
suffices ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.den by
convert (Int.castRingHom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this
simp only [n, sub_mul, Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_mul, sub_left_inj,
Int.cast_sub]
apply Subtype.coe_injective
simp only [coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast]
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rfl
exact norm_sub_modPart_aux r h
theorem exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 :=
⟨modPart p r, modPart_nonneg _, modPart_lt_p _, norm_sub_modPart _ h⟩
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha
have := dvd_add ha hb
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
Int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
simpa using zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (hm : x - m ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p])
(hn : x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : (m : ZMod p) = n := by
rw [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p] at hm hn
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n
simp only [pow_one] at this
specialize this hm hn
apply_fun ZMod.castHom (show p ∣ p ^ 1 by rw [pow_one]) (ZMod p) at this
simp only [map_intCast] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using this
variable (x : ℤ_[p])
theorem exists_mem_range : ∃ n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
simp only [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p, Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd]
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense p (x : ℚ_[p]) zero_lt_one
have H : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_sub_rev] at hr
calc
_ = ‖(r : ℚ_[p]) - x + x‖ := by ring_nf
_ ≤ _ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
_ ≤ _ := max_le (le_of_lt hr) x.2
obtain ⟨n, hzn, hnp, hn⟩ := exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one r H
lift n to ℕ using hzn
use n
constructor
· exact mod_cast hnp
simp only [norm_def, coe_sub, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast] at hn ⊢
rw [show (x - n : ℚ_[p]) = x - r + (r - n) by ring]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _)
apply max_lt hr
simpa using hn
theorem existsUnique_mem_range : ∃! n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
obtain ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩ := exists_mem_range x
use n, ⟨hn₁, hn₂⟩, fun m ⟨hm₁, hm₂⟩ ↦ ?_
have := (zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x n m hn₂ hm₂).symm
rwa [ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, ModEq, mod_eq_of_lt hn₁, mod_eq_of_lt hm₁] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_mem_range := existsUnique_mem_range
/-- `zmodRepr x` is the unique natural number smaller than `p`
satisfying `‖(x - zmodRepr x : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1`.
-/
def zmodRepr : ℕ :=
Classical.choose (existsUnique_mem_range x).exists
theorem zmodRepr_spec : zmodRepr x < p ∧ x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
Classical.choose_spec (existsUnique_mem_range x).exists
theorem zmodRepr_unique (y : ℕ) (hy₁ : y < p) (hy₂ : x - y ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : y = zmodRepr x :=
have h := (Classical.choose_spec (existsUnique_mem_range x)).right
(h y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩).trans (h (zmodRepr x) (zmodRepr_spec x)).symm
theorem zmodRepr_lt_p : zmodRepr x < p :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).1
theorem sub_zmodRepr_mem : x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).2
/-- `toZModHom` is an auxiliary constructor for creating ring homs from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod v`.
-/
def toZModHom (v : ℕ) (f : ℤ_[p] → ℕ) (f_spec : ∀ x, x - f x ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]))
(f_congr :
∀ (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ),
x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) →
x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) → (a : ZMod v) = b) :
ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod v where
toFun x := f x
map_zero' := by
rw [f_congr (0 : ℤ_[p]) _ 0, cast_zero]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_zero, cast_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_one' := by
rw [f_congr (1 : ℤ_[p]) _ 1, cast_one]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_self, cast_one, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_add' := by
intro x y
rw [f_congr (x + y) _ (f x + f y), cast_add]
· exact f_spec _
· convert Ideal.add_mem _ (f_spec x) (f_spec y) using 1
rw [cast_add]
ring
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [f_congr (x * y) _ (f x * f y), cast_mul]
· exact f_spec _
· let I : Ideal ℤ_[p] := Ideal.span {↑v}
convert I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left x (f_spec y)) (I.mul_mem_right ↑(f y) (f_spec x)) using 1
rw [cast_mul]
ring
/-- `toZMod` is a ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod p`,
with the equality `toZMod x = (zmodRepr x : ZMod p)`.
-/
def toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p :=
toZModHom p zmodRepr
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact sub_zmodRepr_mem)
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal)
/-- `z - (toZMod z : ℤ_[p])` is contained in the maximal ideal of `ℤ_[p]`, for every `z : ℤ_[p]`.
The coercion from `ZMod p` to `ℤ_[p]` is `ZMod.cast`,
which coerces `ZMod p` into arbitrary rings.
This is unfortunate, but a consequence of the fact that we allow `ZMod p`
to coerce to rings of arbitrary characteristic, instead of only rings of characteristic `p`.
This coercion is only a ring homomorphism if it coerces into a ring whose characteristic divides
`p`. While this is not the case here we can still make use of the coercion.
-/
theorem toZMod_spec : x - (ZMod.cast (toZMod x) : ℤ_[p]) ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
convert sub_zmodRepr_mem x using 2
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hp_prime.1.pos with ⟨p', rfl⟩
change ↑((_ : ZMod (0 + p' + 1)).val) = (_ : ℤ_[0 + p' + 1])
rw [Nat.cast_inj]
apply mod_eq_of_lt
simpa only [zero_add] using zmodRepr_lt_p x
theorem ker_toZMod : RingHom.ker (toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p) = maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker]
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [h, ZMod.cast_zero, sub_zero] using toZMod_spec x
· intro h
rw [← sub_zero x] at h
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
| convert zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x _ 0 _ h
· norm_cast
· apply sub_zmodRepr_mem
/-- The equivalence between the residue field of the `p`-adic integers and `ℤ/pℤ` -/
def residueField : IsLocalRing.ResidueField ℤ_[p] ≃+* ZMod p :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq PadicInt.ker_toZMod.symm).trans <|
RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (ZMod.ringHom_surjective PadicInt.toZMod)
open scoped Classical in
/-- `appr n x` gives a value `v : ℕ` such that `x` and `↑v : ℤ_p` are congruent mod `p^n`.
See `appr_spec`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/RingHoms.lean | 283 | 294 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Nat.odd_iff, ← Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd] at hn
rw [← mul_two, ← @Nat.cast_two (ZMod n), ← ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime 2 hn, Units.mul_left_eq_zero]
theorem ne_neg_self {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a := by
rwa [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero hn]
theorem neg_one_ne_one {n : ℕ} [Fact (2 < n)] : (-1 : ZMod n) ≠ 1 :=
CharP.neg_one_ne_one (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_mod_two (a : ZMod 2) : -a = a := by
fin_cases a <;> apply Fin.ext <;> simp [Fin.coe_neg, Int.natMod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem natAbs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.natAbs : ZMod 2) = a := by
cases a
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, Int.ofNat_eq_coe]
· simp only [neg_eq_self_mod_two, Nat.cast_succ, Int.natAbs, Int.cast_negSucc]
theorem val_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(val_eq_zero a).not
theorem val_pos {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} : 0 < a.val ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem val_eq_one : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : 1 < n) (a : ZMod n), a.val = 1 ↔ a = 1
| 0, hn, _
| 1, hn, _ => by simp at hn
| n + 2, _, _ => by simp only [val, ZMod, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_one]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ 2 * a.val = n := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← two_mul]
cases n
· rw [@mul_eq_zero ℤ, @mul_eq_zero ℕ, val_eq_zero]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (by simp) Or.inl, fun h =>
Or.inr (h.elim id fun h => h.elim (by simp) id)⟩
conv_lhs =>
rw [← a.natCast_zmod_val, ← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_mul, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨m, he⟩
rcases m with - | m
· rw [mul_zero, mul_eq_zero] at he
rcases he with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | he)
exact Or.inl (a.val_eq_zero.1 he)
cases m
· right
rwa [show 0 + 1 = 1 from rfl, mul_one] at he
refine (a.val_lt.not_le <| Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ zero_lt_two).elim
rw [he, mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
simp
· rintro (rfl | h)
· rw [val_zero, mul_zero]
apply dvd_zero
· rw [h]
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_cast_zmod_lt {m : ℕ} [NeZero m] (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ZMod m) :
(a.cast : ZMod n).val < m := by
rcases m with (⟨⟩|⟨m⟩); · cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
by_cases h : m < n
· rcases n with (⟨⟩|⟨n⟩); · simp at h
rw [← natCast_val, val_cast_of_lt]
· apply a.val_lt
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (ZMod.val_lt a)) h
· rw [not_lt] at h
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (ZMod.val_lt _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_succ m))
theorem neg_val' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = (n - a.val) % n :=
calc
(-a).val = val (-a) % n := by rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (-a).val_lt]
_ = (n - val a) % n :=
Nat.ModEq.add_right_cancel' (val a)
(by
rw [Nat.ModEq, ← val_add, neg_add_cancel, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a.val_le, Nat.mod_self,
val_zero])
theorem neg_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = if a = 0 then 0 else n - a.val := by
rw [neg_val']
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [if_pos h, h, val_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.mod_self]
rw [if_neg h]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
apply Nat.sub_lt (NeZero.pos n)
contrapose! h
rwa [Nat.le_zero, val_eq_zero] at h
theorem val_neg_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [nz : NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) [na : NeZero a] :
(- a).val = n - a.val := by simp_all [neg_val a, na.out]
theorem val_sub {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : b.val ≤ a.val) :
(a - b).val = a.val - b.val := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· cases hb; simp
· have : NeZero b := ⟨hb⟩
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, val_add, val_neg_of_ne_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt (val_lt _)),
add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.add_mod_left]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_of_lt (val_lt _))
theorem val_cast_eq_val_of_lt {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] {a : ZMod m}
(h : a.val < n) : (a.cast : ZMod n).val = a.val := by
have nzn : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => cases nzn; simp_all
| succ n => exact Fin.val_cast_of_lt h
theorem cast_cast_zmod_of_le {m n : ℕ} [hm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast (cast a : ZMod n) : ZMod m) = a := by
have : NeZero n := ⟨((Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hm.out).trans_le h).ne'⟩
rw [cast_eq_val, val_cast_eq_val_of_lt (a.val_lt.trans_le h), natCast_zmod_val]
theorem val_pow {m n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} [ilt : Fact (1 < n)] (h : a.val ^ m < n) :
(a ^ m).val = a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
have : a.val ^ m < n := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· by_cases hm : m = 0
· cases hm; simp [ilt.out]
· simp only [val_zero, ne_eq, hm, not_false_eq_true, zero_pow, Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h]
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by rwa [gt_iff_lt, ZMod.val_pos]) (Nat.le_succ m)) h
rw [pow_succ, ZMod.val_mul, ih this, ← pow_succ, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_pow_le {m n : ℕ} [Fact (1 < n)] {a : ZMod n} : (a ^ m).val ≤ a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
apply le_trans (ZMod.val_mul_le _ _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ ih
theorem natAbs_min_of_le_div_two (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) (he : (x : ZMod n) = y) (hl : x.natAbs ≤ n / 2) :
x.natAbs ≤ y.natAbs := by
rw [intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub] at he
obtain ⟨m, he⟩ := he
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at he
subst he
obtain rfl | hm := eq_or_ne m 0
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
apply hl.trans
rw [← add_le_add_iff_right x.natAbs]
refine le_trans (le_trans ((add_le_add_iff_left _).2 hl) ?_) (Int.natAbs_sub_le _ _)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast]
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| Int.natAbs_pos.2 hm)
rw [← mul_two]; apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
end ZMod
theorem RingHom.ext_zmod {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] (f g : ZMod n →+* R) : f = g := by
ext a
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective a
let φ : ℤ →+* R := f.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
let ψ : ℤ →+* R := g.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
show φ k = ψ k
rw [φ.ext_int ψ]
namespace ZMod
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
instance subsingleton_ringHom [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n →+* R) :=
⟨RingHom.ext_zmod⟩
instance subsingleton_ringEquiv [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n ≃+* R) :=
⟨fun f g => by
rw [RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_inj_iff]
apply RingHom.ext_zmod _ _⟩
| @[simp]
theorem ringHom_map_cast [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) (k : ZMod n) : f (cast k) = k := by
cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast] at f k ⊢; simp
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [map_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` has a right inverse. -/
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 1,081 | 1,088 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Nonarchimedean.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformRing
/-!
# Adic topology
Given a commutative ring `R` and an ideal `I` in `R`, this file constructs the unique
topology on `R` which is compatible with the ring structure and such that a set is a neighborhood
of zero if and only if it contains a power of `I`. This topology is non-archimedean: every
neighborhood of zero contains an open subgroup, namely a power of `I`.
It also studies the predicate `IsAdic` which states that a given topological ring structure is
adic, proving a characterization and showing that raising an ideal to a positive power does not
change the associated topology.
Finally, it defines `WithIdeal`, a class registering an ideal in a ring and providing the
corresponding adic topology to the type class inference system.
## Main definitions and results
* `Ideal.adic_basis`: the basis of submodules given by powers of an ideal.
* `Ideal.adicTopology`: the adic topology associated to an ideal. It has the above basis
for neighborhoods of zero.
* `Ideal.nonarchimedean`: the adic topology is non-archimedean
* `isAdic_iff`: A topological ring is `J`-adic if and only if it admits the powers of `J` as
a basis of open neighborhoods of zero.
* `WithIdeal`: a class registering an ideal in a ring.
## Implementation notes
The `I`-adic topology on a ring `R` has a contrived definition using `I^n • ⊤` instead of `I`
to make sure it is definitionally equal to the `I`-topology on `R` seen as an `R`-module.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
open Set IsTopologicalAddGroup Submodule Filter
open Topology Pointwise
namespace Ideal
theorem adic_basis (I : Ideal R) : SubmodulesRingBasis fun n : ℕ => (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) :=
{ inter := by
suffices ∀ i j : ℕ, ∃ k, I ^ k ≤ I ^ i ∧ I ^ k ≤ I ^ j by
simpa only [smul_eq_mul, mul_top, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, le_inf_iff] using this
intro i j
exact ⟨max i j, pow_le_pow_right (le_max_left i j), pow_le_pow_right (le_max_right i j)⟩
leftMul := by
suffices ∀ (a : R) (i : ℕ), ∃ j : ℕ, a • I ^ j ≤ I ^ i by
simpa only [smul_top_eq_map, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id] using this
intro r n
use n
rintro a ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (I ^ n).smul_mem r hx
mul := by
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, ∃ j : ℕ, (↑(I ^ j) * ↑(I ^ j) : Set R) ⊆ (↑(I ^ i) : Set R) by
simpa only [smul_top_eq_map, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id] using this
intro n
use n
rintro a ⟨x, _hx, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact (I ^ n).smul_mem x hb }
/-- The adic ring filter basis associated to an ideal `I` is made of powers of `I`. -/
def ringFilterBasis (I : Ideal R) :=
I.adic_basis.toRing_subgroups_basis.toRingFilterBasis
/-- The adic topology associated to an ideal `I`. This topology admits powers of `I` as a basis of
neighborhoods of zero. It is compatible with the ring structure and is non-archimedean. -/
def adicTopology (I : Ideal R) : TopologicalSpace R :=
(adic_basis I).topology
theorem nonarchimedean (I : Ideal R) : @NonarchimedeanRing R _ I.adicTopology :=
I.adic_basis.toRing_subgroups_basis.nonarchimedean
/-- For the `I`-adic topology, the neighborhoods of zero has basis given by the powers of `I`. -/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_zero_adic (I : Ideal R) :
HasBasis (@nhds R I.adicTopology (0 : R)) (fun _n : ℕ => True) fun n =>
((I ^ n : Ideal R) : Set R) :=
⟨by
intro U
rw [I.ringFilterBasis.toAddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis.mem_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, h⟩
replace h : ↑(I ^ i) ⊆ U := by simpa using h
exact ⟨i, trivial, h⟩
· rintro ⟨i, -, h⟩
exact ⟨(I ^ i : Ideal R), ⟨i, by simp⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_adic (I : Ideal R) (x : R) :
HasBasis (@nhds R I.adicTopology x) (fun _n : ℕ => True) fun n =>
(fun y => x + y) '' (I ^ n : Ideal R) := by
letI := I.adicTopology
have := I.hasBasis_nhds_zero_adic.map fun y => x + y
rwa [map_add_left_nhds_zero x] at this
variable (I : Ideal R) (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem adic_module_basis :
I.ringFilterBasis.SubmodulesBasis fun n : ℕ => I ^ n • (⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
{ inter := fun i j =>
⟨max i j,
le_inf_iff.mpr
⟨smul_mono_left <| pow_le_pow_right (le_max_left i j),
smul_mono_left <| pow_le_pow_right (le_max_right i j)⟩⟩
smul := fun m i =>
| ⟨(I ^ i • ⊤ : Ideal R), ⟨i, by simp⟩, fun a a_in => by
replace a_in : a ∈ I ^ i := by simpa [(I ^ i).mul_top] using a_in
exact smul_mem_smul a_in mem_top⟩ }
/-- The topology on an `R`-module `M` associated to an ideal `M`. Submodules $I^n M$,
written `I^n • ⊤` form a basis of neighborhoods of zero. -/
def adicModuleTopology : TopologicalSpace M :=
@ModuleFilterBasis.topology R M _ I.adic_basis.topology _ _
(I.ringFilterBasis.moduleFilterBasis (I.adic_module_basis M))
/-- The elements of the basis of neighborhoods of zero for the `I`-adic topology
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Nonarchimedean/AdicTopology.lean | 116 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Basic
/-!
# Frames, completely distributive lattices and complete Boolean algebras
In this file we define and provide API for (co)frames, completely distributive lattices and
complete Boolean algebras.
We distinguish two different distributivity properties:
1. `inf_iSup_eq : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i` (finite `⊓` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This is required by `Frame`, `CompleteDistribLattice`, and `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`
(`Coframe`, etc., require the dual property).
2. `iInf_iSup_eq : (⨅ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ s, ⨅ i, f i (s i)`
(infinite `⨅` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This stronger property is called "completely distributive",
and is required by `CompletelyDistribLattice` and `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`.
## Typeclasses
* `Order.Frame`: Frame: A complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`.
* `Order.Coframe`: Coframe: A complete lattice whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`.
* `CompleteDistribLattice`: Complete distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose `⊓` and `⊔`
distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompletelyDistribLattice`: Completely distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose
`⨅` and `⨆` satisfy `iInf_iSup_eq`.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: Complete atomic Boolean algebra:
A complete Boolean algebra which is additionally completely distributive.
(This implies that it's (co)atom(ist)ic.)
A set of opens gives rise to a topological space precisely if it forms a frame. Such a frame is also
completely distributive, but not all frames are. `Filter` is a coframe but not a completely
distributive lattice.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Complete Heyting algebra*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Heyting_algebra)
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
open Function Set
universe u v w w'
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {κ : ι → Sort w'}
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a frame. Do NOT use,
except for implementing `Order.Frame` via `Order.Frame.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl` fields, which can be recovered using
`Order.Frame.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
class Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf (a : α) (s : Set α) : a ⊓ sSup s ≤ ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a coframe. Do NOT
use, except for implementing `Order.Coframe` via `Order.Coframe.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`Order.Coframe.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
class Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf (a : α) (s : Set α) : ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b ≤ a ⊔ sInf s
/-- A frame, aka complete Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
class Order.Frame (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α, HeytingAlgebra α where
/-- `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
theorem inf_sSup_eq {α : Type*} [Order.Frame α] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
gc_inf_himp.l_sSup
/-- A coframe, aka complete Brouwer algebra or complete co-Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice
whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
class Order.Coframe (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α, CoheytingAlgebra α where
/-- `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
theorem sup_sInf_eq {α : Type*} [Order.Coframe α] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
a ⊔ sInf s = ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b :=
gc_sdiff_sup.u_sInf
open Order
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a complete
distributive lattice. Do NOT use, except for implementing `CompleteDistribLattice` via
`CompleteDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl`, `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`CompleteDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
structure CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u)
extends CompleteLattice α,
toFrameMinimalAxioms : Frame.MinimalAxioms α,
toCoframeMinimalAxioms : Coframe.MinimalAxioms α where
-- We give those projections better name further down
attribute [nolint docBlame] CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.toFrameMinimalAxioms
CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.toCoframeMinimalAxioms
/-- A complete distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⊔` and `⊓` respectively
distribute over `⨅` and `⨆`. -/
class CompleteDistribLattice (α : Type*) extends Frame α, Coframe α, BiheytingAlgebra α
/-- Structure containing the minimal axioms required to check that an order is a completely
distributive. Do NOT use, except for implementing `CompletelyDistribLattice` via
`CompletelyDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`.
This structure omits the `himp`, `compl`, `sdiff`, `hnot` fields, which can be recovered using
`CompletelyDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms`. -/
structure CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
/-- A completely distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⨅` and `⨆`
distribute over each other. -/
class CompletelyDistribLattice (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α, BiheytingAlgebra α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
theorem le_iInf_iSup [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)) ≤ ⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ a) (le_iSup _ _)
lemma iSup_iInf_le [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b ≤ ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) :=
le_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
namespace Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) {s : Set α} {a b : α}
lemma inf_sSup_eq : a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
(minAx.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf _ _).antisymm iSup_inf_le_inf_sSup
lemma sSup_inf_eq : sSup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_sSup_eq α _ s b
lemma iSup_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_range]
lemma inf_iSup_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using minAx.iSup_inf_eq f a
lemma inf_iSup₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ i, ⨆ j, a ⊓ f i j := by
simp only [inf_iSup_eq]
/-- The `Order.Frame.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a frame. -/
def of [Frame α] : MinimalAxioms α where
__ := ‹Frame α›
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s := _root_.inf_sSup_eq.le
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a frame instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
This sets `a ⇨ b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}` and `aᶜ := a ⇨ ⊥`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : Frame α where
__ := minAx
compl a := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ ⊥}
himp a b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}
le_himp_iff _ b c :=
⟨fun h ↦ (inf_le_inf_right _ h).trans (by simp [minAx.sSup_inf_eq]), fun h ↦ le_sSup h⟩
himp_bot _ := rfl
end Order.Frame
namespace Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) {s : Set α} {a b : α}
lemma sup_sInf_eq : a ⊔ sInf s = ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b :=
sup_sInf_le_iInf_sup.antisymm (minAx.iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf _ _)
lemma sInf_sup_eq : sInf s ⊔ b = ⨅ a ∈ s, a ⊔ b := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using @sup_sInf_eq α _ s b
lemma iInf_sup_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨅ i, f i) ⊔ a = ⨅ i, f i ⊔ a := by
rw [iInf, sInf_sup_eq, iInf_range]
lemma sup_iInf_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊔ ⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a ⊔ f i := by
simpa only [sup_comm] using minAx.iInf_sup_eq f a
lemma sup_iInf₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (a ⊔ ⨅ i, ⨅ j, f i j) = ⨅ i, ⨅ j, a ⊔ f i j := by
simp only [sup_iInf_eq]
/-- The `Order.Coframe.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a frame. -/
def of [Coframe α] : MinimalAxioms α where
__ := ‹Coframe α›
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s := _root_.sup_sInf_eq.ge
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a coframe instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
This sets `a \ b := sInf {c | a ≤ b ⊔ c}` and `￢a := ⊤ \ a`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : Coframe α where
__ := minAx
hnot a := sInf {c | ⊤ ≤ a ⊔ c}
sdiff a b := sInf {c | a ≤ b ⊔ c}
sdiff_le_iff a b _ :=
⟨fun h ↦ (sup_le_sup_left h _).trans' (by simp [minAx.sup_sInf_eq]), fun h ↦ sInf_le h⟩
top_sdiff _ := rfl
end Order.Coframe
namespace CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α)
/-- The `CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a complete distrib lattice.
-/
def of [CompleteDistribLattice α] : MinimalAxioms α where
__ := ‹CompleteDistribLattice α›
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s:= inf_sSup_eq.le
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s:= sup_sInf_eq.ge
/-- Turn minimal axioms for `CompleteDistribLattice` into minimal axioms for `Order.Frame`. -/
abbrev toFrame : Frame.MinimalAxioms α := minAx.toFrameMinimalAxioms
/-- Turn minimal axioms for `CompleteDistribLattice` into minimal axioms for `Order.Coframe`. -/
abbrev toCoframe : Coframe.MinimalAxioms α where __ := minAx
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a complete distrib lattice instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
This sets `a ⇨ b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}`, `aᶜ := a ⇨ ⊥`, `a \ b := sInf {c | a ≤ b ⊔ c}` and
`￢a := ⊤ \ a`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : CompleteDistribLattice α where
__ := Frame.ofMinimalAxioms minAx.toFrame
__ := Coframe.ofMinimalAxioms minAx.toCoframe
end CompleteDistribLattice
namespace CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms
variable (minAx : MinimalAxioms α)
lemma iInf_iSup_eq' (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
⨅ i, ⨆ j, f i j = ⨆ g : ∀ i, κ i, ⨅ i, f i (g i) := by
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_iInf_iSup
calc
_ = ⨅ a : range (range <| f ·), ⨆ b : a.1, b.1 := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_range, iSup_subtype, iSup_range]
_ = _ := minAx.iInf_iSup_eq _
_ ≤ _ := iSup_le fun g => by
refine le_trans ?_ <| le_iSup _ fun a => Classical.choose (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2
refine le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ ⟨range (f a), a, rfl⟩) ?_
rw [← Classical.choose_spec (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2]
lemma iSup_iInf_eq (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
⨆ i, ⨅ j, f i j = ⨅ g : ∀ i, κ i, ⨆ i, f i (g i) := by
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
refine le_antisymm iSup_iInf_le ?_
rw [minAx.iInf_iSup_eq']
refine iSup_le fun g => ?_
have ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, ∀ b, ∃ f, ∃ h : a = g f, h ▸ b = f (g f) := of_not_not fun h => by
push_neg at h
choose h hh using h
have := hh _ h rfl
contradiction
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ a)
refine le_iInf fun b => ?_
obtain ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩ := ha b
exact iInf_le _ _
/-- Turn minimal axioms for `CompletelyDistribLattice` into minimal axioms for
`CompleteDistribLattice`. -/
abbrev toCompleteDistribLattice : CompleteDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms α where
__ := minAx
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s := by
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
calc
_ = ⨅ i : ULift.{u} Bool, ⨆ j : match i with | .up true => PUnit.{u + 1} | .up false => s,
match i with
| .up true => a
| .up false => j := by simp [sSup_eq_iSup', iSup_unique, iInf_bool_eq]
_ ≤ _ := by
simp only [minAx.iInf_iSup_eq, iInf_ulift, iInf_bool_eq, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun x ↦ le_biSup _ (x (.up false)).2
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s := by
let _ := minAx.toCompleteLattice
calc
_ ≤ ⨆ i : ULift.{u} Bool, ⨅ j : match i with | .up true => PUnit.{u + 1} | .up false => s,
match i with
| .up true => a
| .up false => j := by
simp only [minAx.iSup_iInf_eq, iSup_ulift, iSup_bool_eq, le_iInf_iff]
exact fun x ↦ biInf_le _ (x (.up false)).2
_ = _ := by simp [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_unique, iSup_bool_eq]
/-- The `CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms` element corresponding to a frame. -/
def of [CompletelyDistribLattice α] : MinimalAxioms α := { ‹CompletelyDistribLattice α› with }
end MinimalAxioms
/-- Construct a completely distributive lattice instance using the minimal amount of work needed.
This sets `a ⇨ b := sSup {c | c ⊓ a ≤ b}`, `aᶜ := a ⇨ ⊥`, `a \ b := sInf {c | a ≤ b ⊔ c}` and
`￢a := ⊤ \ a`. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev ofMinimalAxioms (minAx : MinimalAxioms α) : CompletelyDistribLattice α where
__ := minAx
__ := CompleteDistribLattice.ofMinimalAxioms minAx.toCompleteDistribLattice
end CompletelyDistribLattice
theorem iInf_iSup_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a) :=
CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.of.iInf_iSup_eq' _
theorem iSup_iInf_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b) = ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) :=
CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms.of.iSup_iInf_eq _
instance (priority := 100) CompletelyDistribLattice.toCompleteDistribLattice
[CompletelyDistribLattice α] : CompleteDistribLattice α where
__ := ‹CompletelyDistribLattice α›
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toCompletelyDistribLattice [CompleteLinearOrder α] :
CompletelyDistribLattice α where
__ := ‹CompleteLinearOrder α›
iInf_iSup_eq {α β} g := by
let lhs := ⨅ a, ⨆ b, g a b
let rhs := ⨆ h : ∀ a, β a, ⨅ a, g a (h a)
suffices lhs ≤ rhs from le_antisymm this le_iInf_iSup
if h : ∃ x, rhs < x ∧ x < lhs then
rcases h with ⟨x, hr, hl⟩
suffices rhs ≥ x from nomatch not_lt.2 this hr
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, x < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_not_le fun h =>
lt_irrefl x (lt_of_lt_of_le hl (le_trans (iInf_le _ a) h))
choose f hf using this
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => le_of_lt (hf a)
else
refine le_of_not_lt fun hrl : rhs < lhs => not_le_of_lt hrl ?_
replace h : ∀ x, x ≤ rhs ∨ lhs ≤ x := by
simpa only [not_exists, not_and_or, not_or, not_lt] using h
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, rhs < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_lt_of_le hrl (iInf_le _ a)
choose f hf using this
have : ∀ a, lhs ≤ g a (f a) := fun a =>
(h (g a (f a))).resolve_left (by simpa using hf a)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => this _
section Frame
variable [Frame α] {s t : Set α} {a b c d : α}
instance OrderDual.instCoframe : Coframe αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
theorem sSup_inf_eq : sSup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_sSup_eq α _ s b
theorem iSup_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_range]
theorem inf_iSup_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using iSup_inf_eq f a
theorem iSup₂_inf_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ⊓ a = ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ⊓ a := by
simp only [iSup_inf_eq]
theorem inf_iSup₂_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) :
(a ⊓ ⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), a ⊓ f i j := by
simp only [inf_iSup_eq]
theorem iSup_inf_iSup {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} :
((⨆ i, f i) ⊓ ⨆ j, g j) = ⨆ i : ι × ι', f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 := by
simp_rw [iSup_inf_eq, inf_iSup_eq, iSup_prod]
theorem biSup_inf_biSup {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) ⊓ ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, f (p : ι × ι').1 ⊓ g p.2 := by
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_inf_iSup]
exact (Equiv.surjective _).iSup_congr (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm fun x => rfl
theorem sSup_inf_sSup : sSup s ⊓ sSup t = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : α × α).1 ⊓ p.2 := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_inf_biSup]
theorem iSup_disjoint_iff {f : ι → α} : Disjoint (⨆ i, f i) a ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (f i) a := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, iSup_inf_eq, iSup_eq_bot]
theorem disjoint_iSup_iff {f : ι → α} : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint a (f i) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using @iSup_disjoint_iff
theorem iSup₂_disjoint_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} :
Disjoint (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) a ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (f i j) a := by
simp_rw [iSup_disjoint_iff]
theorem disjoint_iSup₂_iff {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} :
Disjoint a (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint a (f i j) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iSup_iff]
theorem sSup_disjoint_iff {s : Set α} : Disjoint (sSup s) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Disjoint b a := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_eq_bot]
theorem disjoint_sSup_iff {s : Set α} : Disjoint a (sSup s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Disjoint a b := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using @sSup_disjoint_iff
theorem iSup_inf_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ g i = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ ⨆ i, g i := by
refine (le_iSup_inf_iSup f g).antisymm ?_
rw [iSup_inf_iSup]
refine iSup_mono' fun i => ?_
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i.1 i.2 with ⟨j, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨j, inf_le_inf (hf h₁) (hg h₂)⟩
theorem iSup_inf_of_antitone {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ g i = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ ⨆ i, g i :=
@iSup_inf_of_monotone α _ ιᵒᵈ _ _ f g hf.dual_left hg.dual_left
theorem himp_eq_sSup : a ⇨ b = sSup {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} :=
(isGreatest_himp a b).isLUB.sSup_eq.symm
theorem compl_eq_sSup_disjoint : aᶜ = sSup {w | Disjoint w a} :=
(isGreatest_compl a).isLUB.sSup_eq.symm
lemma himp_le_iff : a ⇨ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d, d ⊓ a ≤ b → d ≤ c := by simp [himp_eq_sSup]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Frame.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
rw [← sSup_pair, ← sSup_pair, inf_sSup_eq, ← sSup_image, image_pair]
| instance Prod.instFrame [Frame α] [Frame β] : Frame (α × β) where
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteBooleanAlgebra.lean | 441 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alena Gusakov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
/-!
# Strongly regular graphs
## Main definitions
* `G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ` (see `SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith`) is a structure for
a `SimpleGraph` satisfying the following conditions:
* The cardinality of the vertex set is `n`
* `G` is a regular graph with degree `k`
* The number of common neighbors between any two adjacent vertices in `G` is `ℓ`
* The number of common neighbors between any two nonadjacent vertices in `G` is `μ`
## Main theorems
* `IsSRGWith.compl`: the complement of a strongly regular graph is strongly regular.
* `IsSRGWith.param_eq`: `k * (k - ℓ - 1) = (n - k - 1) * μ` when `0 < n`.
* `IsSRGWith.matrix_eq`: let `A` and `C` be `G`'s and `Gᶜ`'s adjacency matrices respectively and
`I` be the identity matrix, then `A ^ 2 = k • I + ℓ • A + μ • C`.
-/
open Finset
universe u
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} [Fintype V]
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
/-- A graph is strongly regular with parameters `n k ℓ μ` if
* its vertex set has cardinality `n`
* it is regular with degree `k`
* every pair of adjacent vertices has `ℓ` common neighbors
* every pair of nonadjacent vertices has `μ` common neighbors
-/
structure IsSRGWith (n k ℓ μ : ℕ) : Prop where
card : Fintype.card V = n
regular : G.IsRegularOfDegree k
of_adj : ∀ v w, G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = ℓ
of_not_adj : Pairwise fun v w ↦ ¬G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = μ
variable {G} {n k ℓ μ : ℕ}
/-- Empty graphs are strongly regular. Note that `ℓ` can take any value
for empty graphs, since there are no pairs of adjacent vertices. -/
theorem bot_strongly_regular : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) 0 ℓ 0 where
card := rfl
regular := bot_degree
of_adj _ _ h := h.elim
of_not_adj v w _ := by
simp only [card_eq_zero, Fintype.card_ofFinset, forall_true_left, not_false_iff, bot_adj]
ext
simp [mem_commonNeighbors]
/-- **Conway's 99-graph problem** (from https://oeis.org/A248380/a248380.pdf)
can be reformulated as the existence of a strongly regular graph with params (99, 14, 1, 2).
This is an open problem, and has no known proof of existence. -/
proof_wanted conway_99 : ∃ α : Type*, ∃ (g : SimpleGraph α), IsSRGWith G 99 14 1 2
variable [DecidableEq V]
/-- Complete graphs are strongly regular. Note that `μ` can take any value
for complete graphs, since there are no distinct pairs of non-adjacent vertices. -/
theorem IsSRGWith.top :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) (Fintype.card V - 1) (Fintype.card V - 2) μ where
card := rfl
regular := IsRegularOfDegree.top
of_adj _ _ := card_commonNeighbors_top
of_not_adj v w h h' := (h' ((top_adj v w).2 h)).elim
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
#(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w) =
2 * k - Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m := Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w))
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel, ← Set.toFinset_card]
· simp [commonNeighbors, ← neighborFinset_def, Finset.card_union_add_card_inter,
h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
· apply le_trans (card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left _ _ _)
simp [h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
/-- Assuming `G` is strongly regular, `2*(k + 1) - m` in `G` is the number of vertices that are
adjacent to either `v` or `w` when `¬G.Adj v w`. So it's the cardinality of
`G.neighborSet v ∪ G.neighborSet w`. -/
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(hne : v ≠ w) (ha : ¬G.Adj v w) :
#(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w) = 2 * k - μ := by
rw [← h.of_not_adj hne ha]
exact h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(ha : G.Adj v w) : #(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w) = 2 * k - ℓ := by
rw [← h.of_adj v w ha]
exact h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
theorem compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq {v w : V} :
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} ∩ ((G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ \ {w}) =
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) := by
ext
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp [imp_iff_not_or, or_assoc, or_comm, or_left_comm]
theorem sdiff_compl_neighborFinset_inter_eq {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) :
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) =
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ := by
ext
simp only [and_imp, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_compl, and_iff_left_iff_imp, mem_neighborFinset,
mem_inter, mem_singleton]
rintro hnv hnw (rfl | rfl)
· exact hnv h
· apply hnw
rwa [adj_comm]
theorem IsSRGWith.compl_is_regular (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (n - k - 1) := by
rw [← h.card, Nat.sub_sub, add_comm, ← Nat.sub_sub]
| exact h.regular.compl
theorem IsSRGWith.card_commonNeighbors_eq_of_adj_compl (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) {v w : V}
(ha : Gᶜ.Adj v w) : Fintype.card (Gᶜ.commonNeighbors v w) = n - (2 * k - μ) - 2 := by
simp only [← Set.toFinset_card, commonNeighbors, Set.toFinset_inter, neighborSet_compl,
Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_singleton, Set.toFinset_compl, ← neighborFinset_def]
simp_rw [compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq]
have hne : v ≠ w := ne_of_adj _ ha
rw [compl_adj] at ha
rw [card_sdiff, ← insert_eq, card_insert_of_not_mem, card_singleton, ← Finset.compl_union]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/StronglyRegular.lean | 125 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
/-!
# A predicate on adjoining roots of polynomial
This file defines a predicate `IsAdjoinRoot S f`, which states that the ring `S` can be
constructed by adjoining a specified root of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
This predicate is useful when the same ring can be generated by adjoining the root of different
polynomials, and you want to vary which polynomial you're considering.
The results in this file are intended to mirror those in `RingTheory.AdjoinRoot`,
in order to provide an easier way to translate results from one to the other.
## Motivation
`AdjoinRoot` presents one construction of a ring `R[α]`. However, it is possible to obtain
rings of this form in many ways, such as `NumberField.ringOfIntegers ℚ(√-5)`,
or `Algebra.adjoin R {α, α^2}`, or `IntermediateField.adjoin R {α, 2 - α}`,
or even if we want to view `ℂ` as adjoining a root of `X^2 + 1` to `ℝ`.
## Main definitions
The two main predicates in this file are:
* `IsAdjoinRoot S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a specified root of `f : R[X]` to `R`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a root of the monic polynomial
`f : R[X]` to `R`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map into `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.map`: inclusion from `R[X]` to `S`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.root`: the specific root adjoined to `R` to give `S`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map out of `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.repr`: choose a non-unique representative in `R[X]`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.lift`, `IsAdjoinRoot.liftHom`: lift a morphism `R →+* T` to `S →+* T`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom`: a unique representative in `R[X]` if `f` is monic
## Main results
* `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot` and `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic`:
`AdjoinRoot` satisfies the conditions on `IsAdjoinRoot`(`_monic`)
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`: the `root` generates a power basis on `S` over `R`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.aequiv`: algebra isomorphism showing adjoining a root gives a unique ring
up to isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRoot.ofEquiv`: transfer `IsAdjoinRoot` across an algebra isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.minpoly_eq`: the minimal polynomial of the adjoined root of `f` is equal to
`f`, if `f` is irreducible and monic, and `R` is a GCD domain
-/
open scoped Polynomial
open Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u v
-- Porting note: this looks like something that should not be here
-- section MoveMe
--
-- end MoveMe
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRoot S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified root
of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
Compare `PowerBasis R S`, which does not explicitly specify which polynomial we adjoin a root of
(in particular `f` does not need to be the minimal polynomial of the root we adjoin),
and `AdjoinRoot` which constructs a new type.
This is not a typeclass because the choice of root given `S` and `f` is not unique.
-/
structure IsAdjoinRoot {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) : Type max u v where
map : R[X] →+* S
map_surjective : Function.Surjective map
ker_map : RingHom.ker map = Ideal.span {f}
algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R S = map.comp Polynomial.C
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified
root of the monic polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
As long as `f` is monic, there is a well-defined representation of elements of `S` as polynomials
in `R[X]` of degree lower than `deg f` (see `modByMonicHom` and `coeff`). In particular,
we have `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`.
Bundling `Monic` into this structure is very useful when working with explicit `f`s such as
`X^2 - C a * X - C b` since it saves you carrying around the proofs of monicity.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note: This linter does not exist yet.
structure IsAdjoinRootMonic {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) extends IsAdjoinRoot S f where
Monic : Monic f
section Ring
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring S] {f : R[X]} [Algebra R S]
namespace IsAdjoinRoot
/-- `(h : IsAdjoinRoot S f).root` is the root of `f` that can be adjoined to generate `S`. -/
def root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : S :=
h.map X
theorem subsingleton (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton S :=
h.map_surjective.subsingleton
theorem algebraMap_apply (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : R) :
algebraMap R S x = h.map (Polynomial.C x) := by rw [h.algebraMap_eq, RingHom.comp_apply]
theorem mem_ker_map (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : p ∈ RingHom.ker h.map ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [h.ker_map, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : h.map p = 0 ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [← h.mem_ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker]
@[simp]
theorem map_X (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map X = h.root := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_self (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map f = 0 := h.map_eq_zero_iff.mpr dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (p : R[X]) : aeval h.root p = h.map p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [aeval_C, h.algebraMap_apply])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [map_mul, aeval_C, map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, ← h.algebraMap_apply,
RingHom.map_pow, map_X]
theorem aeval_root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : aeval h.root f = 0 := by rw [aeval_eq, map_self]
/-- Choose an arbitrary representative so that `h.map (h.repr x) = x`.
If `f` is monic, use `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom` for a unique choice of representative.
-/
def repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : R[X] :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose
theorem map_repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : h.map (h.repr x) = x :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose_spec
/-- `repr` preserves zero, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_zero_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.repr 0 ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, h.map_repr]
/-- `repr` preserves addition, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_add_sub_repr_add_repr_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x y : S) :
h.repr (x + y) - (h.repr x + h.repr y) ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, map_sub, h.map_repr, map_add, h.map_repr, h.map_repr, sub_self]
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
theorem ext_map (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : ∀ x, h.map x = h'.map x) : h = h' := by
cases h; cases h'; congr
exact RingHom.ext eq
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : h.root = h'.root) : h = h' :=
h.ext_map h' fun x => by rw [← h.aeval_eq, ← h'.aeval_eq, eq]
section lift
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] {i : R →+* T} {x : T}
| section
variable (hx : f.eval₂ i x = 0)
include hx
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IsAdjoinRoot.lean | 179 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
| infer_instance
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 42 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
/-!
# Local graph operations
This file defines some single-graph operations that modify a finite number of vertices
and proves basic theorems about them. When the graph itself has a finite number of vertices
we also prove theorems about the number of edges in the modified graphs.
## Main definitions
* `G.replaceVertex s t` is `G` with `t` replaced by a copy of `s`,
removing the `s-t` edge if present.
* `edge s t` is the graph with a single `s-t` edge. Adding this edge to a graph `G` is then
`G ⊔ edge s t`.
-/
open Finset
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) (s t : V)
namespace Iso
variable {G} {W : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G ≃g G')
include f in
theorem card_edgeFinset_eq [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G'.edgeSet] :
#G.edgeFinset = #G'.edgeFinset := by
apply Finset.card_eq_of_equiv
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset]
exact f.mapEdgeSet
end Iso
section ReplaceVertex
variable [DecidableEq V]
/-- The graph formed by forgetting `t`'s neighbours and instead giving it those of `s`. The `s-t`
edge is removed if present. -/
def replaceVertex : SimpleGraph V where
Adj v w := if v = t then if w = t then False else G.Adj s w
else if w = t then G.Adj v s else G.Adj v w
symm v w := by dsimp only; split_ifs <;> simp [adj_comm]
|
/-- There is never an `s-t` edge in `G.replaceVertex s t`. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Operations.lean | 55 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Quotient
/-!
# Adjoining roots of polynomials
This file defines the commutative ring `AdjoinRoot f`, the ring R[X]/(f) obtained from a
commutative ring `R` and a polynomial `f : R[X]`. If furthermore `R` is a field and `f` is
irreducible, the field structure on `AdjoinRoot f` is constructed.
We suggest stating results on `IsAdjoinRoot` instead of `AdjoinRoot` to achieve higher
generality, since `IsAdjoinRoot` works for all different constructions of `R[α]`
including `AdjoinRoot f = R[X]/(f)` itself.
## Main definitions and results
The main definitions are in the `AdjoinRoot` namespace.
* `mk f : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `of f : R →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `root f : AdjoinRoot f`, the image of X in R[X]/(f).
* `lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : (AdjoinRoot f) →+* S`, the ring
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `i : R →+* S` and sending `X` to `x`.
* `lift_hom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S`, the algebra
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `algebraMap R S` and sending `X` to `x`
* `equiv : (AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[F] E) ≃ {x // x ∈ f.aroots E}` a
bijection between algebra homomorphisms from `AdjoinRoot` and roots of `f` in `S`
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
/-- Adjoin a root of a polynomial `f` to a commutative ring `R`. We define the new ring
as the quotient of `R[X]` by the principal ideal generated by `f`. -/
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
/-- Ring homomorphism from `R[x]` to `AdjoinRoot f` sending `X` to the `root`. -/
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
/-- Embedding of the original ring `R` into `AdjoinRoot f`. -/
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
| SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 120 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_eq_left]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_neg_cancel, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
zsmul_left_inj hp]
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, zsmul_left_inj hp]
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_left_mono hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_left_strictMono hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
end
/-!
### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
section Circular
open AddCommGroup
private theorem toIxxMod_iff (x₁ x₂ x₃ : α) : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp 0 (x₂ - x₁) + toIcoMod hp 0 (x₁ - x₃) ≤ p := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_sub, toIocMod_eq_sub _ x₁, add_le_add_iff_right, ← neg_sub x₁ x₃, toIocMod_neg,
neg_zero, le_sub_iff_add_le]
private theorem toIxxMod_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} (h : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃) :
toIcoMod hp x₂ x₃ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₁ := by
let x₂' := toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂
let x₃' := toIcoMod hp x₂' x₃
have h : x₂' ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' := by simpa [x₃']
have h₂₁ : x₂' < x₁ + p := toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _
have h₃₂ : x₃' - p < x₂' := sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _)
suffices hequiv : x₃' ≤ toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ by
obtain ⟨z, hd⟩ : ∃ z : ℤ, x₂ = x₂' + z • p := ((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).1 rfl).2
simpa [hd, toIocMod_add_zsmul', toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_le_add_iff_right]
rcases le_or_lt x₃' (x₁ + p) with h₃₁ | h₁₃
· suffices hIoc₂₁ : toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ = x₁ + p from hIoc₂₁.symm.trans_ge h₃₁
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨h₂₁, by simp [x₂', left_le_toIcoMod]⟩, -1, by simp⟩
have hIoc₁₃ : toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' = x₃' - p := by
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 h₁₃, le_of_lt (h₃₂.trans h₂₁)⟩, 1, by simp⟩
have not_h₃₂ := (h.trans hIoc₁₃.le).not_lt
contradiction
private theorem toIxxMod_antisymm (h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c)
(h₁₃₂ : toIcoMod hp a c ≤ toIocMod hp a b) :
b ≡ a [PMOD p] ∨ c ≡ b [PMOD p] ∨ a ≡ c [PMOD p] := by
by_contra! h
rw [modEq_comm] at h
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.2.2] at h₁₂₃
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.1] at h₁₃₂
exact h.2.1 ((toIcoMod_inj _).1 <| h₁₃₂.antisymm h₁₂₃)
private theorem toIxxMod_total' (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp b a ≤ toIocMod hp b c ∨ toIcoMod hp b c ≤ toIocMod hp b a := by
/- an essential ingredient is the lemma saying {a-b} + {b-a} = period if a ≠ b (and = 0 if a = b).
Thus if a ≠ b and b ≠ c then ({a-b} + {b-c}) + ({c-b} + {b-a}) = 2 * period, so one of
`{a-b} + {b-c}` and `{c-b} + {b-a}` must be `≤ period` -/
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp a b) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp c b)
simp only [add_add_add_comm] at this
rw [_root_.add_comm (toIocMod _ _ _), add_add_add_comm, ← two_nsmul] at this
replace := min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul this.le
rw [min_le_iff] at this
rw [toIxxMod_iff, toIxxMod_iff]
refine this.imp (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _) (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _)
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
private theorem toIxxMod_total (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c ∨ toIcoMod hp c b ≤ toIocMod hp c a :=
(toIxxMod_total' _ _ _ _).imp_right <| toIxxMod_cyclic_left _
private theorem toIxxMod_trans {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : α}
(h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁)
(h₂₃₄ : toIcoMod hp x₂ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₂) :
toIcoMod hp x₁ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁ := by
constructor
· suffices h : ¬x₃ ≡ x₂ [PMOD p] by
have h₁₂₃' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₁₂₃.1)
have h₂₃₄' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₂₃₄.1)
rw [(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 h] at h₂₃₄'
exact toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (h₁₂₃'.trans h₂₃₄')
by_contra h
rw [(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp).1 h] at h₁₂₃
exact h₁₂₃.2 (left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _).le
· rw [not_le] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
exact (h₁₂₃.2.trans_le (toIcoMod_le_toIocMod _ x₃ x₂)).trans h₂₃₄.2
namespace QuotientAddGroup
variable [hp' : Fact (0 < p)]
instance : Btw (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw x₁ x₂ x₃ := (equivIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) : α) ≤ equivIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁)
theorem btw_coe_iff' {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) ≤ toIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁) :=
Iff.rfl
-- maybe harder to use than the primed one?
theorem btw_coe_iff {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp'.out x₁ x₃ := by
rw [btw_coe_iff', toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
instance circularPreorder : CircularPreorder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw_refl x := show _ ≤ _ by simp [sub_self, hp'.out.le]
btw_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃} h := by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h ⊢
apply toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h
sbtw := _
sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw := Iff.rfl
sbtw_trans_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄} (h₁₂₃ : _ ∧ _) (h₂₃₄ : _ ∧ _) :=
show _ ∧ _ by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₄ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
apply toIxxMod_trans _ h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄
instance circularOrder : CircularOrder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.circularPreorder with
btw_antisymm := fun {x₁ x₂ x₃} h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [btw_cyclic] at h₃₂₁
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
simp_rw [← modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples]
exact toIxxMod_antisymm _ h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
btw_total := fun x₁ x₂ x₃ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff]
apply toIxxMod_total }
end QuotientAddGroup
end Circular
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Connections to `Int.floor` and `Int.fract`
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_floor (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = ⌊(b - a) / p⌋ := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ico, zsmul_eq_mul, ← sub_nonneg, add_comm, sub_right_comm, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add,
sub_right_comm _ _ a]
exact ⟨Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp⟩
theorem toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = -⌊(a + p - b) / p⌋ := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ioc, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add, ← sub_nonneg,
sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
refine ⟨?_, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp⟩
rw [← add_lt_add_iff_right p, add_assoc, add_comm b, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, add_comm (_ * _), ←
sub_lt_iff_lt_add]
exact Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp
theorem toIcoDiv_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoDiv (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = ⌊b⌋ := by
simp [toIcoDiv_eq_floor]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b = a + Int.fract ((b - a) / p) * p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_eq_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
theorem toIcoMod_eq_fract_mul (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b = Int.fract (b / p) * p := by
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp a b = a + p - Int.fract ((a + p - b) / p) * p := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
theorem toIcoMod_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoMod (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = Int.fract b := by
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
end LinearOrderedField
/-! ### Lemmas about unions of translates of intervals -/
section Union
open Set Int
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p) (a : α)
include hp
theorem iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
refine eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun b => mem_iUnion.mpr ?_
rcases sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b with ⟨hl, hr⟩
refine ⟨toIocDiv hp a b, ⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp hl, ?_⟩⟩
rw [add_smul, one_smul, ← add_assoc]
convert sub_le_iff_le_add.mp hr using 1; abel
theorem iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
refine eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun b => mem_iUnion.mpr ?_
rcases sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b with ⟨hl, hr⟩
refine ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, ⟨le_sub_iff_add_le.mp hl, ?_⟩⟩
rw [add_smul, one_smul, ← add_assoc]
convert sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp hr using 1; abel
theorem iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul hp a, univ_subset_iff] using
iUnion_mono fun n : ℤ => (Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) ⊆ Icc _ _)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul hp 0
theorem iUnion_Ico_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul hp 0
theorem iUnion_Icc_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul hp 0
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedRing
variable {α : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] (a : α)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
theorem iUnion_Ico_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
theorem iUnion_Icc_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
variable (α)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ioc_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem iUnion_Ico_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ico_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem iUnion_Icc_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Icc_add_intCast (0 : α)
end LinearOrderedRing
end Union
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 1,097 | 1,099 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion.
We call this `opow` in theorems in order to disambiguate from other exponentials. -/
instance instPow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b ↦ if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2⟩
private theorem opow_of_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b =
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2 :=
if_neg h
/-- `0 ^ a = 1` if `a = 0` and `0 ^ a = 0` otherwise. -/
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
if_pos rfl
theorem zero_opow_le (a : Ordinal) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [zero_opow']
exact sub_le_self 1 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero b), mul_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_succ]
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = ⨆ x : Iio b, a ^ x.1 := by
simp_rw [opow_of_ne_zero ha, limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ hb]
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by
rw [opow_limit a0 h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall]
rfl
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]
simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]
simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero]
| succ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| isLimit b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => exact h0
| succ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| isLimit b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
@[simp]
theorem opow_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ^ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp
· simp [hb]
· simp [opow_ne_zero b ha, ha]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem opow_natCast (a : Ordinal) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n : Ordinal) = a ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n IH => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ, pow_succ, IH]
theorem isNormal_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).lt_iff
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_iff
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).inj
theorem isLimit_opow {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(isNormal_opow a1).isLimit
theorem isLimit_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact isLimit_mul (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact isLimit_opow l.one_lt l'
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| succ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| isLimit c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
theorem opow_le_opow {a b c d : Ordinal} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : a ^ b ≤ c ^ d :=
(opow_le_opow_left b hac).trans (opow_le_opow_right hc hbd)
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
rcases le_or_gt a 1 with a1 | a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
theorem left_lt_opow {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a < a ^ b := by
conv_lhs => rw [← opow_one a]
rwa [opow_lt_opow_iff_right ha]
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_apply
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp
| succ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_add_right b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact
(((isNormal_mul_right <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(isNormal_opow a1)).limit_le
l).symm
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 | a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_mul_right (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
theorem opow_mul_add_pos {b v : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) (u : Ordinal) (hv : v ≠ 0) (w : Ordinal) :
0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb).trans_le <|
(le_mul_left _ <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv).trans <| le_add_right _ _
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : Ordinal} (v : Ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * succ v := by
rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : Ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ succ u := by
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le
(mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _) using 1
exact opow_succ b u
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
/-- The set in the definition of `log` is nonempty. -/
private theorem log_nonempty {b x : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
theorem log_def {b : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) :=
if_pos h
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ 1) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
if_neg h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 := by
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· rw [log_def hb, ← Ordinal.le_zero, pred_le, succ_zero]
apply csInf_le'
rw [mem_setOf, opow_one]
exact bot_lt_of_lt hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
theorem succ_log_def {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
succ (log b x) = sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o } := by
let t := sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }
have : x < b ^ t := csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with (h | h | h)
· refine ((one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx).not_lt ?_).elim
simpa only [h, opow_zero] using this
· rw [show log b x = pred t from log_def hb x, succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h]
· rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_csInf_iff'' (log_nonempty hb)).1 le_rfl a h₂)
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
· rw [succ_log_def hb hx]
exact csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
theorem opow_log_le_self (b : Ordinal) {x : Ordinal} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | b0)
· exact (zero_opow_le _).trans (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with (hb | rfl)
· refine le_of_not_lt fun h => (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le ?_
have := @csInf_le' _ _ { o | x < b ^ o } _ h
rwa [← succ_log_def hb hx] at this
· rwa [one_opow, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `opow_le_iff_le_log'` for a variant assuming `c ≠ 0` rather than `x ≠ 0`. See also
`le_log_of_opow_le` and `opow_le_of_le_log`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x := by
constructor <;>
intro h
· apply le_of_not_lt
intro hn
apply (lt_opow_succ_log_self hb x).not_le <|
((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 <| succ_le_of_lt hn).trans h
· exact ((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 h).trans <| opow_log_le_self b hx
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `opow_le_iff_le_log` for a variant assuming `x ≠ 0` rather than `c ≠ 0`. See also
`le_log_of_opow_le` and `opow_le_of_le_log`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log' {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [log_zero_right, Ordinal.le_zero, Ordinal.le_zero, opow_eq_zero]
simp [hc, (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne']
· exact opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx
theorem le_log_of_opow_le {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ c ≤ x) : c ≤ log b x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [Ordinal.le_zero, opow_eq_zero] at h
exact (zero_lt_one.asymm <| h.1 ▸ hb).elim
· exact (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx).1 h
theorem opow_le_of_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : c ≤ log b x) : b ^ c ≤ x := by
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt b 1
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb] at h
exact (h.not_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hc)).elim
· rwa [opow_le_iff_le_log' hb hc]
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `lt_opow_iff_log_lt'` for a variant assuming `c ≠ 0` rather than `x ≠ 0`. See also
`lt_opow_of_log_lt` and `lt_log_of_lt_opow`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx)
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `lt_opow_iff_log_lt` for a variant assuming `x ≠ 0` rather than `c ≠ 0`. See also
`lt_opow_of_log_lt` and `lt_log_of_lt_opow`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt' {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hc : c ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log' hb hc)
theorem lt_opow_of_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) : log b x < c → x < b ^ c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le <| le_log_of_opow_le hb
theorem lt_log_of_lt_opow {b x c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c → log b x < c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le <| opow_le_of_le_log hc
theorem log_pos {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) : 0 < log b o := by
rwa [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb ho, opow_one]
theorem log_eq_zero {b o : Ordinal} (hbo : o < b) : log b o = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o 0 with (rfl | ho)
· exact log_zero_right b
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
· exact log_zero_left o
· exact log_one_left o
· rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← lt_succ_iff, succ_zero, ← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb ho, opow_one]
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right (b : Ordinal) {x y : Ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) : log b x ≤ log b y := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp_rw [log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
· obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact (opow_le_iff_le_log hb (hx.bot_lt.trans_le xy).ne').1 <|
(opow_log_le_self _ hx).trans xy
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
theorem log_le_self (b x : Ordinal) : log b x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [log_zero_right]
· obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact (right_le_opow _ hb).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)
· simp_rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 1 = 0 := by
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact log_eq_zero hb
· exact log_of_left_le_one hb 1
theorem mod_opow_log_lt_self (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : o % (b ^ log b o) < o := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simpa using Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
· exact (mod_lt _ <| opow_ne_zero _ hb).trans_le (opow_log_le_self _ ho)
|
theorem log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hbo : b ≤ o) :
log b (o % (b ^ log b o)) < log b o := by
rcases eq_or_ne (o % (b ^ log b o)) 0 with h | h
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 426 | 429 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
| ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 315 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finsets in product types
This file defines finset constructions on the product type `α × β`. Beware not to confuse with the
`Finset.prod` operation which computes the multiplicative product.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.product`: Turns `s : Finset α`, `t : Finset β` into their product in `Finset (α × β)`.
* `Finset.diag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.diag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, a)` with
`a ∈ s`.
* `Finset.offDiag`: For `s : Finset α`, `s.offDiag` is the `Finset (α × α)` of pairs `(a, b)` with
`a, b ∈ s` and `a ≠ b`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Multiset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-! ### prod -/
section Prod
variable {s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.product t.nodup⟩
instance instSProd : SProd (Finset α) (Finset β) (Finset (α × β)) where
sprod := Finset.product
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_sprod : Finset.product s t = s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_val : (s ×ˢ t).1 = s.1 ×ˢ t.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s ×ˢ t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Multiset.mem_product
theorem mk_mem_product (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s ×ˢ t :=
mem_product.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(↑(s ×ˢ t) : Set (α × β)) = (s : Set α) ×ˢ t :=
Set.ext fun _ => Finset.mem_product
theorem subset_product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst ⊆ s := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem subset_product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd ⊆ t := fun i => by
simp +contextual [mem_image]
theorem product_image_fst [DecidableEq α] (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.fst = s := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem product_image_snd [DecidableEq β] (ht : s.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).image Prod.snd = t := by
ext i
simp [mem_image, ht.exists_mem]
theorem subset_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ s.image Prod.fst ×ˢ s.image Prod.snd := fun _ hp =>
mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ h =>
mem_product.2 ⟨hs (mem_product.1 h).1, ht (mem_product.1 h).2⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_left (hs : s ⊆ s') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s' ×ˢ t :=
product_subset_product hs (Subset.refl _)
@[gcongr]
theorem product_subset_product_right (ht : t ⊆ t') : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s ×ˢ t' :=
product_subset_product (Subset.refl _) ht
theorem prodMap_image_product {δ : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [DecidableEq δ]
(f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (Prod.map f g) = s.image f ×ˢ t.image g :=
mod_cast Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem prodMap_map_product {δ : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) (g : γ ↪ δ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).map (f.prodMap g) = s.map f ×ˢ t.map g := by
simpa [← coe_inj] using Set.prodMap_image_prod f g s t
theorem map_swap_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).map ⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap_injective⟩ = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_product [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(t ×ˢ s).image Prod.swap = s ×ˢ t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_swap_prod _ _
theorem product_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = s.biUnion fun a => t.image fun b => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
theorem product_eq_biUnion_right [DecidableEq (α × β)] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
s ×ˢ t = t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => (a, b) :=
ext fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by
simp only [mem_product, mem_biUnion, mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
/-- See also `Finset.sup_product_left`. -/
@[simp]
theorem product_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α × β → Finset γ) :
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion f = s.biUnion fun a => t.biUnion fun b => f (a, b) := by
classical simp_rw [product_eq_biUnion, biUnion_biUnion, image_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem card_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : card (s ×ˢ t) = card s * card t :=
Multiset.card_product _ _
/-- The product of two Finsets is nontrivial iff both are nonempty
at least one of them is nontrivial. -/
lemma nontrivial_prod_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nontrivial ↔
s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ (s.Nontrivial ∨ t.Nontrivial) := by
simp_rw [← card_pos, ← one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial, card_product]; apply Nat.one_lt_mul_iff
theorem filter_product (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1 ∧ q x.2) = s.filter p ×ˢ t.filter q := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [mem_filter, mem_product, decide_eq_true_eq, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
theorem filter_product_left (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => p x.1) = s.filter p ×ˢ t := by
simpa using filter_product p fun _ => true
theorem filter_product_right (q : β → Prop) [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => q x.2) = s ×ˢ t.filter q := by
simpa using filter_product (fun _ : α => true) q
theorem filter_product_card (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun x : α × β => (p x.1) = (q x.2)).card =
(s.filter p).card * (t.filter q).card +
(s.filter (¬ p ·)).card * (t.filter (¬ q ·)).card := by
classical
rw [← card_product, ← card_product, ← filter_product, ← filter_product, ← card_union_of_disjoint]
· apply congr_arg
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [filter_union_right, mem_filter, mem_product]
constructor <;> intro h <;> use h.1
· simp only [h.2, Function.comp_apply, Decidable.em, and_self]
· revert h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, and_imp]
rintro _ _ (_|_) <;> simp [*]
· apply Finset.disjoint_filter_filter'
exact (disjoint_compl_right.inf_left _).inf_right _
@[simp]
theorem empty_product (t : Finset β) : (∅ : Finset α) ×ˢ t = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_empty (s : Finset α) : s ×ˢ (∅ : Finset β) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ h => not_mem_empty _ (Finset.mem_product.1 h).2
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.product (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht
⟨(x, y), mem_product.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.1, (mem_product.1 hxy).1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
let ⟨xy, hxy⟩ := h
⟨xy.2, (mem_product.1 hxy).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_product : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.product h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem product_eq_empty {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_product, not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty,
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_product {a : α} :
({a} : Finset α) ×ˢ t = t.map ⟨Prod.mk a, Prod.mk_right_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
lemma product_singleton : s ×ˢ {b} = s.map ⟨fun i => (i, b), Prod.mk_left_injective _⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem singleton_product_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
({a} ×ˢ {b} : Finset _) = {(a, b)} := by
simp only [product_singleton, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem union_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∪ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∪ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [or_and_right, mem_union, mem_product]
@[simp]
theorem product_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∪ t') = s ×ˢ t ∪ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_or_left, mem_union, mem_product]
theorem inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : (s ∩ s') ×ˢ t = s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] : s ×ˢ (t ∩ t') = s ×ˢ t ∩ s ×ˢ t' := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem product_inter_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] :
s ×ˢ t ∩ s' ×ˢ t' = (s ∩ s') ×ˢ (t ∩ t') := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_assoc, and_left_comm, mem_inter, mem_product]
theorem disjoint_product : Disjoint (s ×ˢ t) (s' ×ˢ t') ↔ Disjoint s s' ∨ Disjoint t t' := by
simp_rw [← disjoint_coe, coe_product, Set.disjoint_prod]
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_product (hs : Disjoint s s') :
s.disjUnion s' hs ×ˢ t = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s' ×ˢ t) (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inl hs) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.add_product _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem product_disjUnion (ht : Disjoint t t') :
s ×ˢ t.disjUnion t' ht = (s ×ˢ t).disjUnion (s ×ˢ t') (disjoint_product.mpr <| Or.inr ht) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.product_add _ _ _
end Prod
section Diag
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α)
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the diagonal, `s.diag` is the set of pairs of the form `(a, a)` for
`a ∈ s`. -/
def diag :=
(s ×ˢ s).filter fun a : α × α => a.fst = a.snd
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the off-diagonal, `s.offDiag` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` with `a ≠ b`
for `a, b ∈ s`. -/
def offDiag :=
(s ×ˢ s).filter fun a : α × α => a.fst ≠ a.snd
variable {s} {x : α × α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_diag : x ∈ s.diag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.1 = x.2 := by
simp +contextual [diag]
@[simp]
theorem mem_offDiag : x ∈ s.offDiag ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ s ∧ x.1 ≠ x.2 := by
simp [offDiag, and_assoc]
variable (s)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_offDiag : (s.offDiag : Set (α × α)) = (s : Set α).offDiag :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_offDiag
@[simp]
theorem diag_card : (diag s).card = s.card := by
suffices diag s = s.image fun a => (a, a) by
rw [this]
apply card_image_of_injOn
exact fun x1 _ x2 _ h3 => (Prod.mk.inj h3).1
ext ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
rw [mem_diag]
constructor <;> intro h <;> rw [Finset.mem_image] at *
· use a₁
simpa using h
· rcases h with ⟨a, h1, h2⟩
have h := Prod.mk.inj h2
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
use h1
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_card : (offDiag s).card = s.card * s.card - s.card :=
suffices (diag s).card + (offDiag s).card = s.card * s.card by rw [s.diag_card] at this; omega
by rw [← card_product, diag, offDiag]
conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun a => a.1 = a.2)]
@[mono]
theorem diag_mono : Monotone (diag : Finset α → Finset (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ hx =>
mem_diag.2 <| And.imp_left (@h _) <| mem_diag.1 hx
@[mono]
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Finset α → Finset (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ hx =>
mem_offDiag.2 <| And.imp (@h _) (And.imp_left <| @h _) <| mem_offDiag.1 hx
@[simp]
theorem diag_empty : (∅ : Finset α).diag = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Finset α).offDiag = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diag_union_offDiag : s.diag ∪ s.offDiag = s ×ˢ s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← filter_union_filter_neg_eq (fun a => a.1 = a.2) (s ×ˢ s)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diag_offDiag : Disjoint s.diag s.offDiag :=
disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s ×ˢ s) (s ×ˢ s) (fun a => a.1 = a.2)
theorem product_sdiff_diag : s ×ˢ s \ s.diag = s.offDiag := by
rw [← diag_union_offDiag, union_comm, union_sdiff_self,
sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_offDiag _).symm]
theorem product_sdiff_offDiag : s ×ˢ s \ s.offDiag = s.diag := by
rw [← diag_union_offDiag, union_sdiff_self, sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (disjoint_diag_offDiag _)]
theorem diag_inter : (s ∩ t).diag = s.diag ∩ t.diag :=
ext fun x => by simpa only [mem_diag, mem_inter] using and_and_right
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.offDiag_inter _ _
theorem diag_union : (s ∪ t).diag = s.diag ∪ t.diag := by
ext ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [mem_diag, mem_union, or_and_right]
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.offDiag_union (disjoint_coe.2 h)
variable (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton : ({a} : Finset α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp [← Finset.card_eq_zero]
theorem diag_singleton : ({a} : Finset α).diag = {(a, a)} := by
rw [← product_sdiff_offDiag, offDiag_singleton, sdiff_empty, singleton_product_singleton]
theorem diag_insert : (insert a s).diag = insert (a, a) s.diag := by
rw [insert_eq, insert_eq, diag_union, diag_singleton]
theorem offDiag_insert (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has), offDiag_singleton,
union_empty, union_right_comm]
theorem offDiag_filter_lt_eq_filter_le {ι} [PartialOrder ι]
[DecidableEq ι] [DecidableLE ι] [DecidableLT ι] (s : Finset ι) :
s.offDiag.filter (fun i => i.1 < i.2) = s.offDiag.filter (fun i => i.1 ≤ i.2) := by
rw [Finset.filter_inj']
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp_rw [mem_offDiag, and_imp]
rintro _ _ h
rw [Ne.le_iff_lt h]
end Diag
end Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Prod.lean | 398 | 400 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Finset
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
/-!
# Stabilizer of a set under a pointwise action
This file characterises the stabilizer of a set/finset under the pointwise action of a group.
-/
open Function MulOpposite Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
variable {G H α : Type*}
/-! ### Stabilizer of a set -/
section Set
section Group
variable [Group G] [Group H] [MulAction G α] {a : G} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_empty : stabilizer G (∅ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
Subgroup.coe_eq_univ.1 <| eq_univ_of_forall fun _a ↦ smul_set_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_univ : stabilizer G (Set.univ : Set α) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_singleton (b : α) : stabilizer G ({b} : Set α) = stabilizer G b := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_stabilizer_set {s : Set α} : a ∈ stabilizer G s ↔ ∀ b, a • b ∈ s ↔ b ∈ s := by
refine mem_stabilizer_iff.trans ⟨fun h b ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← (smul_mem_smul_set_iff : a • b ∈ _ ↔ _), h]
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
exact ((MulAction.toPerm a).forall_congr' <| by simp [Iff.comm]).1 h
@[to_additive]
lemma map_stabilizer_le (f : G →* H) (s : Set G) :
(stabilizer G s).map f ≤ stabilizer H (f '' s) := by
rintro a
simp only [Subgroup.mem_map, mem_stabilizer_iff, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
| rintro a ha rfl
rw [← image_smul_distrib, ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma stabilizer_mul_self (s : Set G) : (stabilizer G s : Set G) * s = s := by
ext
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨_, (stabilizer G s).one_mem, _, h, one_mul _⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Pointwise/Stabilizer.lean | 52 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,062 | 2,065 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Finite
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.NoAtoms
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.SFinite
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 396 | 398 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
| section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,039 | 1,046 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FunProp.Attr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Measurability
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file defines measurable spaces and measurable functions.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function
-/
assert_not_exists Covariant MonoidWithZero
open Set Encodable Function Equiv
variable {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : Set α}
/-- A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra. -/
@[class] structure MeasurableSpace (α : Type*) where
/-- Predicate saying that a given set is measurable. Use `MeasurableSet` in the root namespace
instead. -/
MeasurableSet' : Set α → Prop
/-- The empty set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.empty` instead. -/
measurableSet_empty : MeasurableSet' ∅
/-- The complement of a measurable set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.compl` instead. -/
measurableSet_compl : ∀ s, MeasurableSet' s → MeasurableSet' sᶜ
/-- The union of a sequence of measurable sets is a measurable set. Use a more general
`MeasurableSet.iUnion` instead. -/
measurableSet_iUnion : ∀ f : ℕ → Set α, (∀ i, MeasurableSet' (f i)) → MeasurableSet' (⋃ i, f i)
instance [h : MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSpace αᵒᵈ := h
/-- `MeasurableSet s` means that `s` is measurable (in the ambient measure space on `α`) -/
def MeasurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
‹MeasurableSpace α›.MeasurableSet' s
/-- Notation for `MeasurableSet` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra. -/
scoped[MeasureTheory] notation "MeasurableSet[" m "]" => @MeasurableSet _ m
open MeasureTheory
section
open scoped symmDiff
@[simp, measurability]
theorem MeasurableSet.empty [MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSet (∅ : Set α) :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_empty _
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.compl : MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet sᶜ :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_compl _ s
protected theorem MeasurableSet.of_compl (h : MeasurableSet sᶜ) : MeasurableSet s :=
compl_compl s ▸ h.compl
@[simp]
theorem MeasurableSet.compl_iff : MeasurableSet sᶜ ↔ MeasurableSet s :=
⟨.of_compl, .compl⟩
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.univ : MeasurableSet (univ : Set α) :=
.of_compl <| by simp
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurableSet [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} : MeasurableSet s :=
Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
theorem MeasurableSet.congr {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : s = t) : MeasurableSet t := by
rwa [← h]
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.iUnion [Countable ι] ⦃f : ι → Set α⦄
(h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b, f b) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp
· rcases exists_surjective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
rw [← iUnion_congr_of_surjective _ he (fun _ => rfl)]
exact m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun _ => h _
protected theorem MeasurableSet.biUnion {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
have := hs.to_subtype
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (by simpa using h)
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_biUnion {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.biUnion hs.countable h
theorem Finset.measurableSet_biUnion {f : β → Set α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_toSet.measurableSet_biUnion h
protected theorem MeasurableSet.sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact .biUnion hs h
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋃₀ s) :=
MeasurableSet.sUnion hs.countable h
@[measurability]
theorem MeasurableSet.iInter [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) :
MeasurableSet (⋂ b, f b) :=
.of_compl <| by rw [compl_iInter]; exact .iUnion fun b => (h b).compl
theorem MeasurableSet.biInter {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.of_compl <| by rw [compl_iInter₂]; exact .biUnion hs fun b hb => (h b hb).compl
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_biInter {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.biInter hs.countable h
theorem Finset.measurableSet_biInter {f : β → Set α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_toSet.measurableSet_biInter h
theorem MeasurableSet.sInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (⋂₀ s) := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
exact MeasurableSet.biInter hs h
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_sInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋂₀ s) :=
MeasurableSet.sInter hs.countable h
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.inter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl]
exact (h₁.compl.union h₂.compl).compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.diff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ \ s₂) :=
h₁.inter h₂.compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected lemma MeasurableSet.himp {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) :
MeasurableSet (s₁ ⇨ s₂) := by rw [himp_eq]; exact h₂.union h₁.compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.symmDiff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∆ s₂) :=
(h₁.diff h₂).union (h₂.diff h₁)
@[simp, measurability]
protected lemma MeasurableSet.bihimp {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ⇔ s₂) := (h₂.himp h₁).inter (h₁.himp h₂)
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.ite {t s₁ s₂ : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (t.ite s₁ s₂) :=
(h₁.inter ht).union (h₂.diff ht)
open Classical in
theorem MeasurableSet.ite' {s t : Set α} {p : Prop} (hs : p → MeasurableSet s)
(ht : ¬p → MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (ite p s t) := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [hs h, ht h]
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.cond {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) {i : Bool} : MeasurableSet (cond i s₁ s₂) := by
cases i
exacts [h₂, h₁]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.const (p : Prop) : MeasurableSet { _a : α | p } := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
/-- Every set has a measurable superset. Declare this as local instance as needed. -/
theorem nonempty_measurable_superset (s : Set α) : Nonempty { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t } :=
⟨⟨univ, subset_univ s, MeasurableSet.univ⟩⟩
end
theorem MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_injective : Injective (@MeasurableSet α)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, _ => by congr
@[ext]
theorem MeasurableSpace.ext {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α}
(h : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m₁] s ↔ MeasurableSet[m₂] s) : m₁ = m₂ :=
measurableSet_injective <| funext fun s => propext (h s)
/-- A typeclass mixin for `MeasurableSpace`s such that each singleton is measurable. -/
class MeasurableSingletonClass (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
/-- A singleton is a measurable set. -/
measurableSet_singleton : ∀ x, MeasurableSet ({x} : Set α)
export MeasurableSingletonClass (measurableSet_singleton)
@[simp]
lemma MeasurableSet.singleton [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (a : α) :
MeasurableSet {a} :=
measurableSet_singleton a
section MeasurableSingletonClass
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_eq {a : α} : MeasurableSet { x | x = a } := .singleton a
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.insert {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) :
MeasurableSet (insert a s) :=
.union (.singleton a) hs
@[simp]
theorem measurableSet_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} :
MeasurableSet (insert a s) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
classical
exact ⟨fun h =>
if ha : a ∈ s then by rwa [← insert_eq_of_mem ha]
else insert_diff_self_of_not_mem ha ▸ h.diff (.singleton _),
fun h => h.insert a⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.measurableSet {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : MeasurableSet s :=
hs.induction_on .empty .singleton
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : MeasurableSet s :=
Finite.induction_on _ hs .empty fun _ _ hsm => hsm.insert _
@[measurability]
protected theorem Finset.measurableSet (s : Finset α) : MeasurableSet (↑s : Set α) :=
s.finite_toSet.measurableSet
theorem Set.Countable.measurableSet {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : MeasurableSet s := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s]
exact .biUnion hs fun b _ => .singleton b
end MeasurableSingletonClass
namespace MeasurableSpace
/-- Copy of a `MeasurableSpace` with a new `MeasurableSet` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (m : MeasurableSpace α) (p : Set α → Prop) (h : ∀ s, p s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] s) :
MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' := p
measurableSet_empty := by simpa only [h] using m.measurableSet_empty
measurableSet_compl := by simpa only [h] using m.measurableSet_compl
measurableSet_iUnion := by simpa only [h] using m.measurableSet_iUnion
lemma measurableSet_copy {m : MeasurableSpace α} {p : Set α → Prop}
(h : ∀ s, p s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] s) {s} : MeasurableSet[.copy m p h] s ↔ p s :=
Iff.rfl
lemma copy_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} {p : Set α → Prop} (h : ∀ s, p s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] s) :
m.copy p h = m :=
ext h
section CompleteLattice
instance : LE (MeasurableSpace α) where le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m₁] s → MeasurableSet[m₂] s
theorem le_def {α} {a b : MeasurableSpace α} : a ≤ b ↔ a.MeasurableSet' ≤ b.MeasurableSet' :=
Iff.rfl
instance : PartialOrder (MeasurableSpace α) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift (@MeasurableSet α) measurableSet_injective with
le := LE.le
| lt := fun m₁ m₂ => m₁ ≤ m₂ ∧ ¬m₂ ≤ m₁ }
/-- The smallest σ-algebra containing a collection `s` of basic sets -/
inductive GenerateMeasurable (s : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| protected basic : ∀ u ∈ s, GenerateMeasurable s u
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean | 300 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Equiv
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Basic
/-!
# Encodable types
This file defines encodable (constructively countable) types as a typeclass.
This is used to provide explicit encode/decode functions from and to `ℕ`, with the information that
those functions are inverses of each other.
The difference with `Denumerable` is that finite types are encodable. For infinite types,
`Encodable` and `Denumerable` agree.
## Main declarations
* `Encodable α`: States that there exists an explicit encoding function `encode : α → ℕ` with a
partial inverse `decode : ℕ → Option α`.
* `decode₂`: Version of `decode` that is equal to `none` outside of the range of `encode`. Useful as
we do not require this in the definition of `decode`.
* `ULower α`: Any encodable type has an equivalent type living in the lowest universe, namely a
subtype of `ℕ`. `ULower α` finds it.
## Implementation notes
The point of asking for an explicit partial inverse `decode : ℕ → Option α` to `encode : α → ℕ` is
to make the range of `encode` decidable even when the finiteness of `α` is not.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Option List Nat Function
/-- Constructively countable type. Made from an explicit injection `encode : α → ℕ` and a partial
inverse `decode : ℕ → Option α`. Note that finite types *are* countable. See `Denumerable` if you
wish to enforce infiniteness. -/
class Encodable (α : Type*) where
/-- Encoding from Type α to ℕ -/
encode : α → ℕ
/-- Decoding from ℕ to Option α -/
decode : ℕ → Option α
/-- Invariant relationship between encoding and decoding -/
encodek : ∀ a, decode (encode a) = some a
attribute [simp] Encodable.encodek
namespace Encodable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
universe u
theorem encode_injective [Encodable α] : Function.Injective (@encode α _)
| x, y, e => Option.some.inj <| by rw [← encodek, e, encodek]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Logic/Encodable/Basic.lean | 63 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Weilacher. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Felix Weilacher, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Embedding
import Mathlib.Data.Set.MemPartition
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableSeparatingOn
/-!
# Countably generated measurable spaces
We say a measurable space is countably generated if it can be generated by a countable set of sets.
In such a space, we can also build a sequence of finer and finer finite measurable partitions of
the space such that the measurable space is generated by the union of all partitions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated`: class stating that a measurable space is countably
generated.
* `MeasurableSpace.countableGeneratingSet`: a countable set of sets that generates the σ-algebra.
* `MeasurableSpace.countablePartition`: sequences of finer and finer partitions of
a countably generated space, defined by taking the `memPartition` of an enumeration of the sets in
`countableGeneratingSet`.
* `MeasurableSpace.SeparatesPoints` : class stating that a measurable space separates points.
## Main statements
* `MeasurableSpace.measurableEquiv_nat_bool_of_countablyGenerated`: if a measurable space is
countably generated and separates points, it is measure equivalent to a subset of the Cantor Space
`ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
* `MeasurableSpace.measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated`: If a measurable space
admits a countable sequence of measurable sets separating points,
it admits a measurable injection into the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool`
`ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
The file also contains measurability results about `memPartition`, from which the properties of
`countablePartition` are deduced.
-/
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- We say a measurable space is countably generated
if it can be generated by a countable set of sets. -/
class CountablyGenerated (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
isCountablyGenerated : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ m = generateFrom b
/-- A countable set of sets that generate the measurable space.
We insert `∅` to ensure it is nonempty. -/
def countableGeneratingSet (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set (Set α) :=
insert ∅ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose
lemma countable_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Countable (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
Countable.insert _ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.1
lemma generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet [m : MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
generateFrom (countableGeneratingSet α) = m :=
(generateFrom_insert_empty _).trans <| h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.2.symm
lemma empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
∅ ∈ countableGeneratingSet α := mem_insert _ _
lemma nonempty_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Nonempty (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
⟨∅, mem_insert _ _⟩
lemma measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
{s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ countableGeneratingSet α) :
MeasurableSet s := by
rw [← generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)]
exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
/-- A countable sequence of sets generating the measurable space. -/
def natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] : ℕ → (Set α) :=
enumerateCountable (countable_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)) ∅
lemma generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] : generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _)) = m := by
rw [natGeneratingSequence, range_enumerateCountable_of_mem _ empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet,
generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet]
lemma measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (n : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet (natGeneratingSequence α n) :=
measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet <| Set.enumerateCountable_mem _
empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet n
theorem CountablyGenerated.comap [m : MeasurableSpace β] [h : CountablyGenerated β] (f : α → β) :
@CountablyGenerated α (.comap f m) := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨b, hbc, rfl⟩⟩
rw [comap_generateFrom]
letI := generateFrom (preimage f '' b)
exact ⟨_, hbc.image _, rfl⟩
theorem CountablyGenerated.sup {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} (h₁ : @CountablyGenerated β m₁)
(h₂ : @CountablyGenerated β m₂) : @CountablyGenerated β (m₁ ⊔ m₂) := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁c, rfl⟩⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂c, rfl⟩⟩
exact @mk _ (_ ⊔ _) ⟨_, hb₁c.union hb₂c, generateFrom_sup_generateFrom⟩
/-- Any measurable space structure on a countable space is countably generated. -/
instance (priority := 100) [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] : CountablyGenerated α where
isCountablyGenerated := by
refine ⟨⋃ y, {measurableAtom y}, countable_iUnion (fun i ↦ countable_singleton _), ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le (by simp [MeasurableSet.measurableAtom_of_countable]))
intro s hs
have : s = ⋃ y ∈ s, measurableAtom y := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
simpa using ⟨x, hx, by simp⟩
· simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
exact measurableAtom_subset hs hx
rw [this]
apply MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable s) (fun x _hx ↦ ?_)
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
simp
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] {p : α → Prop} :
CountablyGenerated { x // p x } := .comap _
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] [MeasurableSpace β] [CountablyGenerated β] :
CountablyGenerated (α × β) :=
.sup (.comap Prod.fst) (.comap Prod.snd)
section SeparatesPoints
/-- We say that a measurable space separates points if for any two distinct points,
there is a measurable set containing one but not the other. -/
class SeparatesPoints (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
separates : ∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) → x = y
theorem separatesPoints_def [MeasurableSpace α] [hs : SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) : x = y := hs.separates _ _ h
theorem exists_measurableSet_of_ne [MeasurableSpace α] [SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : x ≠ y) : ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∉ s := by
contrapose! h
exact separatesPoints_def h
theorem separatesPoints_iff [MeasurableSpace α] : SeparatesPoints α ↔
∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s)) → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ fun _ _ hxy ↦ h.separates _ _ fun _ hs xs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp xs,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ h _ _ fun _ hs ↦
⟨fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs xs, not_imp_not.mp fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs.compl xs⟩⟩⟩
/-- If the measurable space generated by `S` separates points,
then this is witnessed by sets in `S`. -/
theorem separating_of_generateFrom (S : Set (Set α))
[h : @SeparatesPoints α (generateFrom S)] :
∀ x y : α, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y := by
letI := generateFrom S
intros x y hxy
rw [← forall_generateFrom_mem_iff_mem_iff] at hxy
exact separatesPoints_def <| fun _ hs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp
theorem SeparatesPoints.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @SeparatesPoints _ m] (h : m ≤ m') :
@SeparatesPoints _ m' := @SeparatesPoints.mk _ m' fun _ _ hxy ↦
@SeparatesPoints.separates _ m hsep _ _ fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ (h _ hs)
/-- We say that a measurable space is countably separated if there is a
countable sequence of measurable sets separating points. -/
class CountablySeparated (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
countably_separated : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ
instance countablySeparated_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ] : CountablySeparated α := ⟨h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
h.countably_separated
theorem countablySeparated_def [MeasurableSpace α] :
CountablySeparated α ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.countably_separated, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem CountablySeparated.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @CountablySeparated _ m]
(h : m ≤ m') : @CountablySeparated _ m' := by
simp_rw [countablySeparated_def] at *
rcases hsep with ⟨S, Sct, Smeas, hS⟩
use S, Sct, (fun s hs ↦ h _ <| Smeas _ hs), hS
theorem CountablySeparated.subtype_iff [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} :
CountablySeparated s ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet s := by
rw [countablySeparated_def]
exact HasCountableSeparatingOn.subtype_iff
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α] [h : SeparatesPoints α]
{s : Set α} : SeparatesPoints s :=
⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ Subtype.val_injective <| h.1 _ _ fun _ ht ↦ hxy _ <| measurable_subtype_coe ht⟩
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] {s : Set α} : CountablySeparated s := by
rw [CountablySeparated.subtype_iff]
exact h.countably_separated.mono (fun s ↦ id) <| subset_univ _
instance (priority := 100) separatesPoints_of_measurableSingletonClass [MeasurableSpace α]
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] : SeparatesPoints α := by
refine ⟨fun x y h ↦ ?_⟩
specialize h _ (MeasurableSet.singleton x)
simp_rw [mem_singleton_iff, forall_true_left] at h
exact h.symm
instance (priority := 50) MeasurableSingletonClass.of_separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α]
[Countable α] [SeparatesPoints α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α where
measurableSet_singleton x := by
choose s hsm hxs hys using fun y (h : x ≠ y) ↦ exists_measurableSet_of_ne h
convert MeasurableSet.iInter fun y ↦ .iInter fun h ↦ hsm y h
ext y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | h
· simpa
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, h.symm, false_iff, mem_iInter, not_forall]
exact ⟨y, h, hys y h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated_subtype
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : CountablySeparated s] :
HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mp h
instance countablySeparated_subtype_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s] :
CountablySeparated s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mpr h
instance countablySeparated_of_separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] : CountablySeparated α := by
rcases h with ⟨b, hbc, hb⟩
refine ⟨⟨b, hbc, fun t ht ↦ hb.symm ▸ .basic t ht, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hb] at ‹SeparatesPoints _›
convert separating_of_generateFrom b
simp
variable (α)
/-- If a measurable space admits a countable separating family of measurable sets,
there is a countably generated coarser space which still separates points. -/
theorem exists_countablyGenerated_le_of_countablySeparated [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] :
∃ m' : MeasurableSpace α, @CountablyGenerated _ m' ∧ @SeparatesPoints _ m' ∧ m' ≤ m := by
rcases h with ⟨b, bct, hbm, hb⟩
refine ⟨generateFrom b, ?_, ?_, generateFrom_le hbm⟩
· use b
rw [@separatesPoints_iff]
exact fun x y hxy ↦ hb _ trivial _ trivial fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ <| measurableSet_generateFrom hs
open Function
open Classical in
/-- A map from a measurable space to the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool` induced by a countable
sequence of sets generating the measurable space. -/
noncomputable
def mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
Bool := x ∈ natGeneratingSequence α n
theorem measurable_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Measurable (mapNatBool α) := by
rw [measurable_pi_iff]
refine fun n ↦ measurable_to_bool ?_
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mapNatBool,
Bool.decide_iff, setOf_mem_eq]
apply measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence
theorem injective_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
[SeparatesPoints α] : Injective (mapNatBool α) := by
intro x y hxy
rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α] at *
apply separating_of_generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _))
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← decide_eq_decide]
exact congr_fun hxy n
/-- If a measurable space is countably generated and separates points, it is measure equivalent
to some subset of the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
Note: `s` need not be measurable, so this map need not be a `MeasurableEmbedding` to
the Cantor Space. -/
theorem measurableEquiv_nat_bool_of_countablyGenerated [MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] :
∃ s : Set (ℕ → Bool), Nonempty (α ≃ᵐ s) := by
use range (mapNatBool α), Equiv.ofInjective _ <|
injective_mapNatBool _,
Measurable.subtype_mk <| measurable_mapNatBool _
simp_rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α]
apply measurable_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← Equiv.image_eq_preimage _ _]
refine ⟨{y | y n}, by measurability, ?_⟩
rw [← Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image]
simp [mapNatBool]
/-- If a measurable space admits a countable sequence of measurable sets separating points,
it admits a measurable injection into the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool`
(equipped with the product sigma algebra). -/
theorem measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablySeparated α] : ∃ f : α → ℕ → Bool, Measurable f ∧ Injective f := by
rcases exists_countablyGenerated_le_of_countablySeparated α with ⟨m', _, _, m'le⟩
refine ⟨mapNatBool α, ?_, injective_mapNatBool _⟩
exact (measurable_mapNatBool _).mono m'le le_rfl
variable {α}
--TODO: Make this an instance
theorem measurableSingletonClass_of_countablySeparated
[MeasurableSpace α] [CountablySeparated α] :
MeasurableSingletonClass α := by
rcases measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated α with ⟨f, fmeas, finj⟩
refine ⟨fun x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← finj.preimage_image {x}, image_singleton]
exact fmeas <| MeasurableSet.singleton _
end SeparatesPoints
section MeasurableMemPartition
lemma measurableSet_succ_memPartition (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ memPartition t n) :
MeasurableSet[generateFrom (memPartition t (n + 1))] s := by
rw [← diff_union_inter s (t n)]
refine MeasurableSet.union ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine measurableSet_generateFrom ?_
rw [memPartition_succ]
exact ⟨s, hs, by simp⟩
lemma generateFrom_memPartition_le_succ (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
generateFrom (memPartition t n) ≤ generateFrom (memPartition t (n + 1)) :=
generateFrom_le (fun _ hs ↦ measurableSet_succ_memPartition t n hs)
lemma measurableSet_generateFrom_memPartition_iff (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) (s : Set α) :
MeasurableSet[generateFrom (memPartition t n)] s
↔ ∃ S : Finset (Set α), ↑S ⊆ memPartition t n ∧ s = ⋃₀ S := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨S, hS_subset, hS_eq⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· induction s, h using generateFrom_induction with
| hC u hu _ => exact ⟨{u}, by simp [hu], by simp⟩
| empty => exact ⟨∅, by simp, by simp⟩
| compl u _ hu =>
obtain ⟨S, hS_subset, rfl⟩ := hu
classical
refine ⟨(memPartition t n).toFinset \ S, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [Finset.coe_sdiff, coe_toFinset]
exact diff_subset
· simp only [Finset.coe_sdiff, coe_toFinset]
refine (IsCompl.eq_compl ⟨?_, ?_⟩).symm
· refine Set.disjoint_sUnion_right.mpr fun u huS => ?_
refine Set.disjoint_sUnion_left.mpr fun v huV => ?_
refine disjoint_memPartition t n (mem_of_mem_diff huV) (hS_subset huS) ?_
exact ne_of_mem_of_not_mem huS (not_mem_of_mem_diff huV) |>.symm
· rw [codisjoint_iff]
simp only [sup_eq_union, top_eq_univ]
rw [← sUnion_memPartition t n, union_comm, ← sUnion_union, union_diff_cancel hS_subset]
| iUnion f _ h =>
choose S hS_subset hS_eq using h
have : Fintype (⋃ n, (S n : Set (Set α))) := by
refine (Finite.subset (finite_memPartition t n) ?_).fintype
simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
exact hS_subset
refine ⟨(⋃ n, (S n : Set (Set α))).toFinset, ?_, ?_⟩
| · simp only [coe_toFinset, iUnion_subset_iff]
exact hS_subset
· simp only [coe_toFinset, sUnion_iUnion, hS_eq]
· rw [hS_eq, sUnion_eq_biUnion]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion ?_ (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
· exact S.countable_toSet
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hS_subset ht)
lemma measurableSet_generateFrom_memPartition (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/CountablyGenerated.lean | 361 | 369 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
dsimp only [zero]
subsingleton
instance [HasZeroObject V] : HasZeroObject (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨⟨zero, isZero_zero⟩⟩
noncomputable instance [HasZeroObject V] : Inhabited (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨zero⟩
theorem congr_hom {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} {f g : C ⟶ D} (w : f = g) (i : ι) :
f.f i = g.f i :=
congr_fun (congr_arg Hom.f w) i
lemma mono_of_mono_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)) : Mono φ where
right_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_mono (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
lemma epi_of_epi_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Epi (φ.f i)) : Epi φ where
left_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_epi (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
section
variable (V c)
/-- The functor picking out the `i`-th object of a complex. -/
@[simps]
def eval (i : ι) : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ V where
obj C := C.X i
map f := f.f i
instance (i : ι) : (eval V c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
/-- The functor forgetting the differential in a complex, obtaining a graded object. -/
@[simps]
def forget : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ GradedObject ι V where
obj C := C.X
map f := f.f
instance : (forget V c).Faithful where
map_injective h := by
ext i
exact congr_fun h i
/-- Forgetting the differentials than picking out the `i`-th object is the same as
just picking out the `i`-th object. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetEval (i : ι) : forget V c ⋙ GradedObject.eval i ≅ eval V c i :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
end
noncomputable section
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ φ.f n' := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n' ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ φ.f n := by subst h; simp
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i j'` are both allowed, then we must have `j = j'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem d_comp_eqToHom {i j j' : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i j') :
C.d i j' ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.next_eq rij' rij)) = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i' j` are both allowed, then we must have `i = i'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem eqToHom_comp_d {i i' j : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i' j) :
eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.prev_eq rij rij')) ≫ C.d i' j = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
theorem kernel_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j j' : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) (r' : c.Rel i j') :
kernelSubobject (C.d i j) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j') := by
rw [← d_comp_eqToHom C r r']
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i i' j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j)
(r' : c.Rel i' j) : imageSubobject (C.d i j) = imageSubobject (C.d i' j) := by
rw [← eqToHom_comp_d C r r']
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
section
/-- Either `C.X i`, if there is some `i` with `c.Rel i j`, or `C.X j`. -/
abbrev xPrev (j : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.prev j)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xPrevIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.prev_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `i` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xPrevIsoSelf {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.prev]
rw [dif_neg]
push_neg; intro i hi
have : c.prev j = i := c.prev_eq' hi
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- Either `C.X j`, if there is some `j` with `c.rel i j`, or `C.X i`. -/
abbrev xNext (i : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.next i)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.next_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `j` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.next]
rw [dif_neg]; rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
have : c.next i = j := c.next_eq' hj
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- The differential mapping into `C.X j`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dTo (j : ι) : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j :=
C.d (c.prev j) j
/-- The differential mapping out of `C.X i`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dFrom (i : ι) : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i :=
C.d i (c.next i)
theorem dTo_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dTo j = (C.xPrevIso r).hom ≫ C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' r
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dTo_eq_zero {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.dTo j = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
theorem dFrom_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dFrom i = C.d i j ≫ (C.xNextIso r).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' r
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dFrom_eq_zero {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.dFrom i = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIso_comp_dTo {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : (C.xPrevIso r).inv ≫ C.dTo j = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dTo_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIsoSelf_comp_dTo {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) :
(C.xPrevIsoSelf h).inv ≫ C.dTo j = 0 := by simp [h]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIso r).hom = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dFrom_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIsoSelf h).hom = 0 := by simp [h]
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem dTo_comp_dFrom (j : ι) : C.dTo j ≫ C.dFrom j = 0 :=
C.d_comp_d _ _ _
theorem kernel_from_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
kernelSubobject (C.dFrom i) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dFrom_eq r]
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_to_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
imageSubobject (C.dTo j) = imageSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dTo_eq r]
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
end
namespace Hom
variable {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c}
/-- The `i`-th component of an isomorphism of chain complexes. -/
@[simps!]
def isoApp (f : C₁ ≅ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i :=
(eval V c i).mapIso f
/-- Construct an isomorphism of chain complexes from isomorphism of the objects
which commute with the differentials. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfComponents (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom := by aesop_cat) :
C₁ ≅ C₂ where
hom :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).hom
comm' := hf }
inv :=
| { f := fun i => (f i).inv
comm' := fun i j hij =>
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 507 | 508 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
/-!
# Discrete quotients of a topological space.
This file defines the type of discrete quotients of a topological space,
denoted `DiscreteQuotient X`. To avoid quantifying over types, we model such
quotients as setoids whose equivalence classes are clopen.
## Definitions
1. `DiscreteQuotient X` is the type of discrete quotients of `X`.
It is endowed with a coercion to `Type`, which is defined as the
quotient associated to the setoid in question, and each such quotient
is endowed with the discrete topology.
2. Given `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the projection `X → S` is denoted
`S.proj`.
3. When `X` is compact and `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the space `S` is
endowed with a `Fintype` instance.
## Order structure
The type `DiscreteQuotient X` is endowed with an instance of a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderTop`.
The partial ordering `A ≤ B` mathematically means that `B.proj` factors through `A.proj`.
The top element `⊤` is the trivial quotient, meaning that every element of `X` is collapsed
to a point. Given `h : A ≤ B`, the map `A → B` is `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE h`.
Whenever `X` is a locally connected space, the type `DiscreteQuotient X` is also endowed with an
instance of an `OrderBot`, where the bot element `⊥` is given by the `connectedComponentSetoid`,
i.e., `x ~ y` means that `x` and `y` belong to the same connected component. In particular, if `X`
is a discrete topological space, then `x ~ y` is equivalent (propositionally, not definitionally) to
`x = y`.
Given `f : C(X, Y)`, we define a predicate `DiscreteQuotient.LEComap f A B` for
`A : DiscreteQuotient X` and `B : DiscreteQuotient Y`, asserting that `f` descends to `A → B`. If
`cond : DiscreteQuotient.LEComap h A B`, the function `A → B` is obtained by
`DiscreteQuotient.map f cond`.
## Theorems
The two main results proved in this file are:
1. `DiscreteQuotient.eq_of_forall_proj_eq` which states that when `X` is compact, T₂, and totally
disconnected, any two elements of `X` are equal if their projections in `Q` agree for all
`Q : DiscreteQuotient X`.
2. `DiscreteQuotient.exists_of_compat` which states that when `X` is compact, then any
system of elements of `Q` as `Q : DiscreteQuotient X` varies, which is compatible with
respect to `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE`, must arise from some element of `X`.
## Remarks
The constructions in this file will be used to show that any profinite space is a limit
of finite discrete spaces.
-/
open Set Function TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {α X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
/-- The type of discrete quotients of a topological space. -/
@[ext]
structure DiscreteQuotient (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] extends Setoid X where
/-- For every point `x`, the set `{ y | Rel x y }` is an open set. -/
protected isOpen_setOf_rel : ∀ x, IsOpen (setOf (toSetoid x))
namespace DiscreteQuotient
variable (S : DiscreteQuotient X)
lemma toSetoid_injective : Function.Injective (@toSetoid X _)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, _ => by congr
/-- Construct a discrete quotient from a clopen set. -/
def ofIsClopen {A : Set X} (h : IsClopen A) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := ⟨fun x y => x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A, fun _ => Iff.rfl, Iff.symm, Iff.trans⟩
isOpen_setOf_rel x := by by_cases hx : x ∈ A <;> simp [hx, h.1, h.2, ← compl_setOf]
theorem refl : ∀ x, S.toSetoid x x := S.refl'
theorem symm (x y : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y x := S.symm'
theorem trans (x y z : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y z → S.toSetoid x z := S.trans'
/-- The setoid whose quotient yields the discrete quotient. -/
add_decl_doc toSetoid
instance : CoeSort (DiscreteQuotient X) (Type _) :=
⟨fun S => Quotient S.toSetoid⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace S :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.toSetoid))
/-- The projection from `X` to the given discrete quotient. -/
def proj : X → S := Quotient.mk''
theorem fiber_eq (x : X) : S.proj ⁻¹' {S.proj x} = setOf (S.toSetoid x) :=
Set.ext fun _ => eq_comm.trans Quotient.eq''
theorem proj_surjective : Function.Surjective S.proj :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem proj_isQuotientMap : IsQuotientMap S.proj :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias proj_quotientMap := proj_isQuotientMap
theorem proj_continuous : Continuous S.proj :=
S.proj_isQuotientMap.continuous
instance : DiscreteTopology S :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.1 <| S.proj_surjective.forall.2 fun x => by
rw [← S.proj_isQuotientMap.isOpen_preimage, fiber_eq]
exact S.isOpen_setOf_rel _
theorem proj_isLocallyConstant : IsLocallyConstant S.proj :=
(IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous S.proj).2 S.proj_continuous
theorem isClopen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClopen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(isClopen_discrete A).preimage S.proj_continuous
theorem isOpen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsOpen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).2
theorem isClosed_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClosed (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).1
theorem isClopen_setOf_rel (x : X) : IsClopen (setOf (S.toSetoid x)) := by
rw [← fiber_eq]
apply isClopen_preimage
instance : Min (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
⟨fun S₁ S₂ => ⟨S₁.1 ⊓ S₂.1, fun x => (S₁.2 x).inter (S₂.2 x)⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
Injective.semilatticeInf toSetoid toSetoid_injective fun _ _ => rfl
instance : OrderTop (DiscreteQuotient X) where
top := ⟨⊤, fun _ => isOpen_univ⟩
le_top a := by tauto
instance : Inhabited (DiscreteQuotient X) := ⟨⊤⟩
instance inhabitedQuotient [Inhabited X] : Inhabited S := ⟨S.proj default⟩
-- TODO: add instances about `Nonempty (Quot _)`/`Nonempty (Quotient _)`
instance [Nonempty X] : Nonempty S := Nonempty.map S.proj ‹_›
/-- The quotient by `⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance : Subsingleton (⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X) where
allEq := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; exact Quotient.sound trivial
section Comap
variable (g : C(Y, Z)) (f : C(X, Y))
/-- Comap a discrete quotient along a continuous map. -/
def comap (S : DiscreteQuotient Y) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := Setoid.comap f S.1
isOpen_setOf_rel _ := (S.2 _).preimage f.continuous
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : S.comap (ContinuousMap.id X) = S := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp (S : DiscreteQuotient Z) : S.comap (g.comp f) = (S.comap g).comap f :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono {A B : DiscreteQuotient Y} (h : A ≤ B) : A.comap f ≤ B.comap f := by tauto
end Comap
section OfLE
variable {A B C : DiscreteQuotient X}
/-- The map induced by a refinement of a discrete quotient. -/
def ofLE (h : A ≤ B) : A → B :=
Quotient.map' id h
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_refl : ofLE (le_refl A) = id := by
ext ⟨⟩
rfl
| theorem ofLE_refl_apply (a : A) : ofLE (le_refl A) a = a := by simp
| Mathlib/Topology/DiscreteQuotient.lean | 196 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Canonical
/-!
# Distance function on ℕ
This file defines a simple distance function on naturals from truncated subtraction.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Distance (absolute value of difference) between natural numbers. -/
def dist (n m : ℕ) :=
n - m + (m - n)
theorem dist_comm (n m : ℕ) : dist n m = dist m n := by simp [dist, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (n : ℕ) : dist n n = 0 := by simp [dist, tsub_self]
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : dist n m = 0) : n = m :=
have : n - m = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h
have : n ≤ m := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
have : m - n = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h
have : m ≤ n := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
le_antisymm ‹n ≤ m› ‹m ≤ n›
theorem dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : dist n m = 0 := by rw [h, dist_self]
theorem dist_eq_sub_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : dist n m = m - n := by
rw [dist, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, zero_add]
theorem dist_eq_sub_of_le_right {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : dist n m = n - m := by
rw [dist_comm]; apply dist_eq_sub_of_le h
theorem dist_tri_left (n m : ℕ) : m ≤ dist n m + n :=
le_trans le_tsub_add (add_le_add_right (Nat.le_add_left _ _) _)
theorem dist_tri_right (n m : ℕ) : m ≤ n + dist n m := by rw [add_comm]; apply dist_tri_left
theorem dist_tri_left' (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ dist n m + m := by rw [dist_comm]; apply dist_tri_left
theorem dist_tri_right' (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ m + dist n m := by rw [dist_comm]; apply dist_tri_right
theorem dist_zero_right (n : ℕ) : dist n 0 = n :=
Eq.trans (dist_eq_sub_of_le_right (zero_le n)) (tsub_zero n)
theorem dist_zero_left (n : ℕ) : dist 0 n = n :=
Eq.trans (dist_eq_sub_of_le (zero_le n)) (tsub_zero n)
theorem dist_add_add_right (n k m : ℕ) : dist (n + k) (m + k) = dist n m :=
calc
dist (n + k) (m + k) = n + k - (m + k) + (m + k - (n + k)) := rfl
_ = n - m + (m + k - (n + k)) := by rw [@add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_right]
_ = n - m + (m - n) := by rw [@add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_right]
theorem dist_add_add_left (k n m : ℕ) : dist (k + n) (k + m) = dist n m := by
rw [add_comm k n, add_comm k m]; apply dist_add_add_right
theorem dist_eq_intro {n m k l : ℕ} (h : n + m = k + l) : dist n k = dist l m :=
calc
dist n k = dist (n + m) (k + m) := by rw [dist_add_add_right]
_ = dist (k + l) (k + m) := by rw [h]
_ = dist l m := by rw [dist_add_add_left]
theorem dist.triangle_inequality (n m k : ℕ) : dist n k ≤ dist n m + dist m k := by
have : dist n m + dist m k = n - m + (m - k) + (k - m + (m - n)) := by
simp [dist, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
rw [this, dist]
exact add_le_add tsub_le_tsub_add_tsub tsub_le_tsub_add_tsub
theorem dist_mul_right (n k m : ℕ) : dist (n * k) (m * k) = dist n m * k := by
rw [dist, dist, right_distrib, tsub_mul n, tsub_mul m]
| theorem dist_mul_left (k n m : ℕ) : dist (k * n) (k * m) = k * dist n m := by
rw [mul_comm k n, mul_comm k m, dist_mul_right, mul_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Dist.lean | 81 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
/-!
# Closed subsets
This file defines the metric and emetric space structure on the types of closed subsets and nonempty
compact subsets of a metric or emetric space.
The Hausdorff distance induces an emetric space structure on the type of closed subsets
of an emetric space, called `Closeds`. Its completeness, resp. compactness, resp.
second-countability, follow from the corresponding properties of the original space.
In a metric space, the type of nonempty compact subsets (called `NonemptyCompacts`) also
inherits a metric space structure from the Hausdorff distance, as the Hausdorff edistance is
always finite in this context.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Set Function TopologicalSpace Filter Topology ENNReal
namespace EMetric
section
variable {α : Type u} [EMetricSpace α] {s : Set α}
/-- In emetric spaces, the Hausdorff edistance defines an emetric space structure
on the type of closed subsets -/
instance Closeds.emetricSpace : EMetricSpace (Closeds α) where
edist s t := hausdorffEdist (s : Set α) t
edist_self _ := hausdorffEdist_self
edist_comm _ _ := hausdorffEdist_comm
edist_triangle _ _ _ := hausdorffEdist_triangle
eq_of_edist_eq_zero {s t} h :=
Closeds.ext <| (hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed s.isClosed t.isClosed).1 h
/-- The edistance to a closed set depends continuously on the point and the set -/
theorem continuous_infEdist_hausdorffEdist :
Continuous fun p : α × Closeds α => infEdist p.1 p.2 := by
refine continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by simp) ?_
rintro ⟨x, s⟩ ⟨y, t⟩
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist (t : Set α) s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ infEdist y t + edist x y + hausdorffEdist (t : Set α) s :=
| (add_le_add_right infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist _)
_ = infEdist y t + (edist x y + hausdorffEdist (s : Set α) t) := by
rw [add_assoc, hausdorffEdist_comm]
_ ≤ infEdist y t + (edist (x, s) (y, t) + edist (x, s) (y, t)) :=
(add_le_add_left (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)) _)
_ = infEdist y t + 2 * edist (x, s) (y, t) := by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
/-- Subsets of a given closed subset form a closed set -/
theorem isClosed_subsets_of_isClosed (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed { t : Closeds α | (t : Set α) ⊆ s } := by
refine isClosed_of_closure_subset fun
(t : Closeds α) (ht : t ∈ closure {t : Closeds α | (t : Set α) ⊆ s}) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ t) => ?_
have : x ∈ closure s := by
refine mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => ?_
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Closeds.lean | 56 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
cases s₂
simp [AList.toFinmap]
@[simp]
theorem AList.toFinmap_entries (s : AList β) : ⟦s⟧.entries = s.entries :=
rfl
/-- Given `l : List (Sigma β)`, create a term of type `Finmap β` by removing
entries with duplicate keys. -/
def List.toFinmap [DecidableEq α] (s : List (Sigma β)) : Finmap β :=
s.toAList.toFinmap
namespace Finmap
open AList
lemma nodup_entries (f : Finmap β) : f.entries.Nodup := f.nodupKeys.nodup
/-! ### Lifting from AList -/
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def liftOn {γ} (s : Finmap β) (f : AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a b : AList β, a.entries ~ b.entries → f a = f b) : γ := by
refine
(Quotient.liftOn s.entries
(fun (l : List (Sigma β)) => (⟨_, fun nd => f ⟨l, nd⟩⟩ : Part γ))
(fun l₁ l₂ p => Part.ext' (perm_nodupKeys p) ?_) : Part γ).get ?_
· exact fun h1 h2 => H _ _ p
· have := s.nodupKeys
revert this
rcases s.entries with ⟨l⟩
exact id
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_toFinmap {γ} (s : AList β) (f : AList β → γ) (H) : liftOn ⟦s⟧ f H = f s := by
cases s
rfl
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on 2 `AList`s to 2 `Finmap`s. -/
def liftOn₂ {γ} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : AList β,
a₁.entries ~ a₂.entries → b₁.entries ~ b₂.entries → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : γ :=
liftOn s₁ (fun l₁ => liftOn s₂ (f l₁) fun _ _ p => H _ _ _ _ (Perm.refl _) p) fun a₁ a₂ p => by
have H' : f a₁ = f a₂ := funext fun _ => H _ _ _ _ p (Perm.refl _)
simp only [H']
@[simp]
theorem liftOn₂_toFinmap {γ} (s₁ s₂ : AList β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ) (H) :
liftOn₂ ⟦s₁⟧ ⟦s₂⟧ f H = f s₁ s₂ := by
cases s₁; cases s₂; rfl
/-! ### Induction -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : Finmap β → Prop} (s : Finmap β) (H : ∀ a : AList β, C ⟦a⟧) : C s := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩; exact H ⟨a, h⟩
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧) : C s₁ s₂ :=
induction_on s₁ fun l₁ => induction_on s₂ fun l₂ => H l₁ l₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₃ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ a₃ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧ ⟦a₃⟧) : C s₁ s₂ s₃ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => induction_on s₃ fun l₃ => H l₁ l₂ l₃
/-! ### extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {s t : Finmap β}, s.entries = t.entries → s = t
| ⟨l₁, h₁⟩, ⟨l₂, _⟩, H => by congr
@[simp]
theorem ext_iff' {s t : Finmap β} : s.entries = t.entries ↔ s = t :=
Finmap.ext_iff.symm
/-! ### mem -/
/-- The predicate `a ∈ s` means that `s` has a value associated to the key `a`. -/
instance : Membership α (Finmap β) :=
| ⟨fun s a => a ∈ s.entries.keys⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 161 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ULift
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Cardinal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.PrimePow
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Encodable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.GaloisField
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Cardinality
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Divisibility
/-!
# Cardinality of Fields
In this file we show all the possible cardinalities of fields. All infinite cardinals can harbour
a field structure, and so can all types with prime power cardinalities, and this is sharp.
## Main statements
* `Fintype.nonempty_field_iff`: A `Fintype` can be given a field structure iff its cardinality is a
prime power.
* `Infinite.nonempty_field` : Any infinite type can be endowed a field structure.
* `Field.nonempty_iff` : There is a field structure on type iff its cardinality is a prime power.
-/
local notation "‖" x "‖" => Fintype.card x
open scoped Cardinal nonZeroDivisors
universe u
/-- A finite field has prime power cardinality. -/
theorem Fintype.isPrimePow_card_of_field {α} [Fintype α] [Field α] : IsPrimePow ‖α‖ := by
-- TODO: `Algebra` version of `CharP.exists`, of type `∀ p, Algebra (ZMod p) α`
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := CharP.exists α
haveI hp := Fact.mk (CharP.char_is_prime α p)
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) α := ZMod.algebra _ _
let b := IsNoetherian.finsetBasis (ZMod p) α
rw [Module.card_fintype b, ZMod.card, isPrimePow_pow_iff]
· exact hp.1.isPrimePow
rw [← Module.finrank_eq_card_basis b]
exact Module.finrank_pos.ne'
/-- A `Fintype` can be given a field structure iff its cardinality is a prime power. -/
theorem Fintype.nonempty_field_iff {α} [Fintype α] : Nonempty (Field α) ↔ IsPrimePow ‖α‖ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => Fintype.isPrimePow_card_of_field, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨p, n, hp, hn, hα⟩
haveI := Fact.mk hp.nat_prime
haveI : Fintype (GaloisField p n) := Fintype.ofFinite (GaloisField p n)
exact ⟨(Fintype.equivOfCardEq
(((Fintype.card_eq_nat_card).trans (GaloisField.card p n hn.ne')).trans hα)).symm.field⟩
theorem Fintype.not_isField_of_card_not_prime_pow {α} [Fintype α] [Ring α] :
¬IsPrimePow ‖α‖ → ¬IsField α :=
mt fun h => Fintype.nonempty_field_iff.mp ⟨h.toField⟩
/-- Any infinite type can be endowed a field structure. -/
theorem Infinite.nonempty_field {α : Type u} [Infinite α] : Nonempty (Field α) := by
suffices #α = #(FractionRing (MvPolynomial α <| ULift.{u} ℚ)) from
(Cardinal.eq.1 this).map (·.field)
simp
|
/-- There is a field structure on type if and only if its cardinality is a prime power. -/
theorem Field.nonempty_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Field α) ↔ IsPrimePow #α := by
rw [Cardinal.isPrimePow_iff]
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite α
· simpa only [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left',
(Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0 _).not_le, false_or] using Fintype.nonempty_field_iff
· simpa only [← Cardinal.infinite_iff, h, true_or, iff_true] using Infinite.nonempty_field
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Cardinality.lean | 66 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.FlagRange
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Basis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleRing.Basic
/-!
# Flag of submodules defined by a basis
In this file we define `Basis.flag b k`, where `b : Basis (Fin n) R M`, `k : Fin (n + 1)`,
to be the subspace spanned by the first `k` vectors of the basis `b`.
We also prove some lemmas about this definition.
-/
open Set Submodule
namespace Basis
section Semiring
variable {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {n : ℕ} {b : Basis (Fin n) R M}
{i j : Fin (n + 1)}
/-- The subspace spanned by the first `k` vectors of the basis `b`. -/
def flag (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) (k : Fin (n + 1)) : Submodule R M :=
.span R <| b '' {i | i.castSucc < k}
@[simp]
theorem flag_zero (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) : b.flag 0 = ⊥ := by simp [flag]
@[simp]
theorem flag_last (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) : b.flag (.last n) = ⊤ := by
simp [flag]
theorem flag_le_iff (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) {k p} :
b.flag k ≤ p ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, i.castSucc < k → b i ∈ p :=
span_le.trans forall_mem_image
theorem flag_succ (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) (k : Fin n) :
b.flag k.succ = (R ∙ b k) ⊔ b.flag k.castSucc := by
simp only [flag, Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
simp [Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, le_iff_eq_or_lt, setOf_or, image_insert_eq, span_insert]
theorem self_mem_flag (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) {i : Fin n} {k : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i.castSucc < k) :
b i ∈ b.flag k :=
subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp]
theorem self_mem_flag_iff [Nontrivial R] (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) {i : Fin n} {k : Fin (n + 1)} :
b i ∈ b.flag k ↔ i.castSucc < k :=
b.self_mem_span_image
@[mono]
theorem flag_mono (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) : Monotone b.flag :=
Fin.monotone_iff_le_succ.2 fun k ↦ by rw [flag_succ]; exact le_sup_right
theorem isChain_range_flag (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) : IsChain (· ≤ ·) (range b.flag) :=
b.flag_mono.isChain_range
@[mono]
theorem flag_strictMono [Nontrivial R] (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) : StrictMono b.flag :=
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun _ ↦ by simp [flag_succ]
@[gcongr] lemma flag_le_flag (hij : i ≤ j) : b.flag i ≤ b.flag j := flag_mono _ hij
@[gcongr]
lemma flag_lt_flag [Nontrivial R] (hij : i < j) : b.flag i < b.flag j := flag_strictMono _ hij
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem flag_le_ker_coord_iff [Nontrivial R] (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) {k : Fin (n + 1)} {l : Fin n} :
b.flag k ≤ LinearMap.ker (b.coord l) ↔ k ≤ l.castSucc := by
| simp [flag_le_iff, Finsupp.single_apply_eq_zero, imp_false, imp_not_comm]
theorem flag_le_ker_coord (b : Basis (Fin n) R M) {k : Fin (n + 1)} {l : Fin n}
(h : k ≤ l.castSucc) : b.flag k ≤ LinearMap.ker (b.coord l) := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basis/Flag.lean | 83 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
/-!
# Determinant of families of vectors
This file defines the determinant of an endomorphism, and of a family of vectors
with respect to some basis. For the determinant of a matrix, see the file
`LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant`.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `Basis.det`: the determinant of a family of vectors with respect to a basis,
as a multilinear map
* `LinearMap.det`: the determinant of an endomorphism `f : End R M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
* `LinearEquiv.det`: the determinant of an isomorphism `f : M ≃ₗ[R] M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
## Tags
basis, det, determinant
-/
noncomputable section
open Matrix LinearMap Submodule Set Function
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M']
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable (e : Basis ι R M)
section Conjugate
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A]
variable {m n : Type*}
/-- If `R^m` and `R^n` are linearly equivalent, then `m` and `n` are also equivalent. -/
def equivOfPiLEquivPi {R : Type*} [Finite m] [Finite n] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R]
(e : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R) : m ≃ n :=
Basis.indexEquiv (Basis.ofEquivFun e.symm) (Pi.basisFun _ _)
namespace Matrix
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they are square matrices up to
equivalence of types. -/
def indexEquivOfInv [Nontrivial A] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix n m A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : m ≃ n :=
equivOfPiLEquivPi (toLin'OfInv hMM' hM'M)
theorem det_comm [DecidableEq n] (M N : Matrix n n A) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- If there exists a two-sided inverse `M'` for `M` (indexed differently),
then `det (N * M) = det (M * N)`. -/
theorem det_comm' [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n m A} {N : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix m n A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
nontriviality A
-- Although `m` and `n` are different a priori, we will show they have the same cardinality.
-- This turns the problem into one for square matrices, which is easy.
let e := indexEquivOfInv hMM' hM'M
rw [← det_submatrix_equiv_self e, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.refl n) _, det_comm,
submatrix_mul_equiv, Equiv.coe_refl, submatrix_id_id]
/-- If `M'` is a two-sided inverse for `M` (indexed differently), `det (M * N * M') = det N`.
See `Matrix.det_conj` and `Matrix.det_conj'` for the case when `M' = M⁻¹` or vice versa. -/
theorem det_conj_of_mul_eq_one [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix n m A} {N : Matrix n n A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) :
det (M * N * M') = det N := by
rw [← det_comm' hM'M hMM', ← Matrix.mul_assoc, hM'M, Matrix.one_mul]
end Matrix
end Conjugate
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Determinant of a linear map -/
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M]
variable {κ : Type*} [Fintype κ]
/-- The determinant of `LinearMap.toMatrix` does not depend on the choice of basis. -/
theorem det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix [DecidableEq κ] (b : Basis ι A M) (c : Basis κ A M)
(f : M →ₗ[A] M) : det (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) = det (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by
rw [← linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix c b c, ← basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix b c b,
Matrix.det_conj_of_mul_eq_one] <;>
rw [Basis.toMatrix_mul_toMatrix, Basis.toMatrix_self]
/-- The determinant of an endomorphism given a basis.
See `LinearMap.det` for a version that populates the basis non-computably.
Although the `Trunc (Basis ι A M)` parameter makes it slightly more convenient to switch bases,
there is no good way to generalize over universe parameters, so we can't fully state in `detAux`'s
type that it does not depend on the choice of basis. Instead you can use the `detAux_def''` lemma,
or avoid mentioning a basis at all using `LinearMap.det`.
-/
irreducible_def detAux : Trunc (Basis ι A M) → (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A :=
Trunc.lift
(fun b : Basis ι A M => detMonoidHom.comp (toMatrixAlgEquiv b : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* Matrix ι ι A))
fun b c => MonoidHom.ext <| det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix b c
/-- Unfold lemma for `detAux`.
See also `detAux_def''` which allows you to vary the basis.
-/
theorem detAux_def' (b : Basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.detAux (Trunc.mk b) f = Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
rw [detAux]
rfl
theorem detAux_def'' {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι'] (tb : Trunc <| Basis ι A M)
(b' : Basis ι' A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.detAux tb f = Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix b' b' f) := by
induction tb using Trunc.induction_on with
| | h b => rw [detAux_def', det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix b b']
@[simp]
theorem detAux_id (b : Trunc <| Basis ι A M) : LinearMap.detAux b LinearMap.id = 1 :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Determinant.lean | 142 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
| lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 165 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
|
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 285 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
/-!
# Euclidean spaces
This file makes some definitions and proves very basic geometrical
results about real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
Results about real inner product spaces that involve the norm and
inner product but not angles generally go in
`Analysis.NormedSpace.InnerProduct`. Results with longer
proofs or more geometrical content generally go in separate files.
## Implementation notes
To declare `P` as the type of points in a Euclidean affine space with
`V` as the type of vectors, use
`[NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]`.
This works better with `outParam` to make
`V` implicit in most cases than having a separate type alias for
Euclidean affine spaces.
Rather than requiring Euclidean affine spaces to be finite-dimensional
(as in the definition on Wikipedia), this is specified only for those
theorems that need it.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_space
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The inner product of two vectors given with `weightedVSub`, in
terms of the pairwise distances. -/
theorem inner_weightedVSub {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ} (p₁ : ι₁ → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ} (p₂ : ι₂ → P)
(h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪s₁.weightedVSub p₁ w₁, s₂.weightedVSub p₂ w₂⟫ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂) * dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂))) /
2 := by
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_apply, Finset.weightedVSub_apply,
inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero _ h₁ _ h₂]
simp_rw [vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
rcongr (i₁ i₂) <;> rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂)]
/-- The distance between two points given with `affineCombination`,
in terms of the pairwise distances between the points in that
combination. -/
theorem dist_affineCombination {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {w₁ w₂ : ι → ℝ} (p : ι → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) : by
have a₁ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁
have a₂ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂
exact dist a₁ a₂ * dist a₁ a₂ = (-∑ i₁ ∈ s, ∑ i₂ ∈ s,
(w₁ - w₂) i₁ * (w₁ - w₂) i₂ * (dist (p i₁) (p i₂) * dist (p i₁) (p i₂))) / 2 := by
dsimp only
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁) (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂), ←
@inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
have h : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h₁, h₂, sub_self]
exact inner_weightedVSub p h p h
-- Porting note: `inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq` moved to `PerpendicularBisector`
/-- The squared distance between points on a line (expressed as a
multiple of a fixed vector added to a point) and another point,
expressed as a quadratic. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_sq (r : ℝ) (v : V) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ * dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ =
⟪v, v⟫ * r * r + 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * r + ⟪p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, vadd_vsub_assoc,
real_inner_add_add_self, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right]
ring
/-- The condition for two points on a line to be equidistant from
another point. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist {v : V} (p₁ p₂ : P) (hv : v ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ ↔ r = 0 ∨ r = -2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫ := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg, dist_smul_vadd_sq, mul_assoc,
← sub_eq_zero, add_sub_assoc, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sub_self]
have hvi : ⟪v, v⟫ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hv
have hd : discrim ⟪v, v⟫ (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) 0 = 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) := by
rw [discrim]
ring
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff hvi hd, neg_add_cancel, zero_div, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ←
mul_sub_right_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_two, mul_assoc, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_mul_left,
mul_div_assoc]
norm_num
open AffineSubspace Module
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in a two-dimensional subspace containing those points
(two circles intersect in at most two points). -/
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq_of_mem_of_finrank_eq_two {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = 2) {c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ p : P}
(hc₁s : c₁ ∈ s) (hc₂s : c₂ ∈ s) (hp₁s : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂s : p₂ ∈ s) (hps : p ∈ s) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
| (hc : c₁ ≠ c₂) (hp : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁c₁ : dist p₁ c₁ = r₁) (hp₂c₁ : dist p₂ c₁ = r₁)
(hpc₁ : dist p c₁ = r₁) (hp₁c₂ : dist p₁ c₂ = r₂) (hp₂c₂ : dist p₂ c₂ = r₂)
(hpc₂ : dist p c₂ = r₂) : p = p₁ ∨ p = p₂ := by
have ho : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hp₂c₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hp₂c₂.symm)
have hop : ⟪c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq (hp₁c₁.trans hpc₁.symm) (hp₁c₂.trans hpc₂.symm)
let b : Fin 2 → V := ![c₂ -ᵥ c₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁]
have hb : LinearIndependent ℝ b := by
refine linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ ?_
· intro i
fin_cases i <;> simp [b, hc.symm, hp.symm]
· intro i j hij
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Basic.lean | 122 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Subfield.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.Basic
/-!
# Normed division rings and fields
In this file we define normed fields, and (more generally) normed division rings. We also prove
some theorems about these definitions.
Some useful results that relate the topology of the normed field to the discrete topology include:
* `norm_eq_one_iff_ne_zero_of_discrete`
Methods for constructing a normed field instance from a given real absolute value on a field are
given in:
* AbsoluteValue.toNormedField
-/
-- Guard against import creep.
assert_not_exists AddChar comap_norm_atTop DilationEquiv Finset.sup_mul_le_mul_sup_of_nonneg
IsOfFinOrder Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one NNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero Rat.norm_cast_real
RestrictScalars
variable {G α β ι : Type*}
open Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal
/-- A normed division ring is a division ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies the equality
`‖x y‖ = ‖x‖ ‖y‖`. -/
class NormedDivisionRing (α : Type*) extends Norm α, DivisionRing α, MetricSpace α where
/-- The distance is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y)
/-- The norm is multiplicative. -/
protected norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A normed division ring is a normed ring. -/
instance (priority := 100) NormedDivisionRing.toNormedRing [β : NormedDivisionRing α] :
NormedRing α :=
{ β with norm_mul_le a b := (NormedDivisionRing.norm_mul a b).le }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The norm on a normed division ring is strictly multiplicative. -/
instance (priority := 100) NormedDivisionRing.toNormMulClass [NormedDivisionRing α] :
NormMulClass α where
norm_mul := NormedDivisionRing.norm_mul
section NormedDivisionRing
variable [NormedDivisionRing α] {a b : α}
instance (priority := 900) NormedDivisionRing.to_normOneClass : NormOneClass α :=
⟨mul_left_cancel₀ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 (one_ne_zero' α)) <| by rw [← norm_mul, mul_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem norm_div (a b : α) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖a‖ / ‖b‖ :=
map_div₀ (normHom : α →*₀ ℝ) a b
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_div (a b : α) : ‖a / b‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ / ‖b‖₊ :=
map_div₀ (nnnormHom : α →*₀ ℝ≥0) a b
@[simp]
theorem norm_inv (a : α) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ (normHom : α →*₀ ℝ) a
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_inv (a : α) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp
@[simp]
lemma enorm_inv {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ⁻¹ := by simp [enorm, ENNReal.coe_inv, ha]
@[simp]
theorem norm_zpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (normHom : α →*₀ ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_zpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (nnnormHom : α →*₀ ℝ≥0)
theorem dist_inv_inv₀ {z w : α} (hz : z ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
dist z⁻¹ w⁻¹ = dist z w / (‖z‖ * ‖w‖) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, inv_sub_inv' hz hw, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_inv, norm_inv, mul_comm ‖z‖⁻¹,
mul_assoc, dist_eq_norm', div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
theorem nndist_inv_inv₀ {z w : α} (hz : z ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
nndist z⁻¹ w⁻¹ = nndist z w / (‖z‖₊ * ‖w‖₊) :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_inv_inv₀ hz hw
lemma norm_commutator_sub_one_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
‖a * b * a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖a‖⁻¹ * ‖b‖⁻¹ * ‖a - 1‖ * ‖b - 1‖ := by
simpa using norm_commutator_units_sub_one_le (.mk0 a ha) (.mk0 b hb)
lemma nnnorm_commutator_sub_one_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
‖a * b * a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ - 1‖₊ ≤ 2 * ‖a‖₊⁻¹ * ‖b‖₊⁻¹ * ‖a - 1‖₊ * ‖b - 1‖₊ := by
simpa using nnnorm_commutator_units_sub_one_le (.mk0 a ha) (.mk0 b hb)
namespace NormedDivisionRing
section Discrete
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [DiscreteTopology 𝕜]
lemma norm_eq_one_iff_ne_zero_of_discrete {x : 𝕜} : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
constructor <;> intro hx
· contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
· have : IsOpen {(0 : 𝕜)} := isOpen_discrete {0}
simp_rw [Metric.isOpen_singleton_iff, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at this
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, h'⟩ := this
wlog h : ‖x‖ < 1 generalizing 𝕜 with H
· push_neg at h
rcases h.eq_or_lt with h|h
· rw [h]
replace h := norm_inv x ▸ inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ h
rw [← inv_inj, inv_one, ← norm_inv]
exact H (by simpa) h' h
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, ‖x‖ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos h
rw [← norm_pow] at hk
specialize h' _ hk
simp [hx] at h'
@[simp]
lemma norm_le_one_of_discrete
(x : 𝕜) : ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl|hx
· simp
· simp [norm_eq_one_iff_ne_zero_of_discrete.mpr hx]
lemma unitClosedBall_eq_univ_of_discrete : (Metric.closedBall 0 1 : Set 𝕜) = Set.univ := by
ext
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias discreteTopology_unit_closedBall_eq_univ := unitClosedBall_eq_univ_of_discrete
end Discrete
end NormedDivisionRing
end NormedDivisionRing
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ‖x y‖ = ‖x‖ ‖y‖. -/
class NormedField (α : Type*) extends Norm α, Field α, MetricSpace α where
/-- The distance is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y)
/-- The norm is multiplicative. -/
protected norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b
/-- A nontrivially normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different
from `0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by
multiplication by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class NontriviallyNormedField (α : Type*) extends NormedField α where
/-- The norm attains a value exceeding 1. -/
non_trivial : ∃ x : α, 1 < ‖x‖
/-- A densely normed field is a normed field for which the image of the norm is dense in `ℝ≥0`,
which means it is also nontrivially normed. However, not all nontrivally normed fields are densely
normed; in particular, the `Padic`s exhibit this fact. -/
class DenselyNormedField (α : Type*) extends NormedField α where
/-- The range of the norm is dense in the collection of nonnegative real numbers. -/
lt_norm_lt : ∀ x y : ℝ, 0 ≤ x → x < y → ∃ a : α, x < ‖a‖ ∧ ‖a‖ < y
section NormedField
/-- A densely normed field is always a nontrivially normed field.
See note [lower instance priority]. -/
instance (priority := 100) DenselyNormedField.toNontriviallyNormedField [DenselyNormedField α] :
NontriviallyNormedField α where
non_trivial :=
let ⟨a, h, _⟩ := DenselyNormedField.lt_norm_lt 1 2 zero_le_one one_lt_two
⟨a, h⟩
variable [NormedField α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) NormedField.toNormedDivisionRing : NormedDivisionRing α :=
{ ‹NormedField α› with }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) NormedField.toNormedCommRing : NormedCommRing α :=
{ ‹NormedField α› with norm_mul_le a b := (norm_mul a b).le }
end NormedField
namespace NormedField
section Nontrivially
variable (α) [NontriviallyNormedField α]
theorem exists_one_lt_norm : ∃ x : α, 1 < ‖x‖ :=
‹NontriviallyNormedField α›.non_trivial
theorem exists_one_lt_nnnorm : ∃ x : α, 1 < ‖x‖₊ := exists_one_lt_norm α
theorem exists_one_lt_enorm : ∃ x : α, 1 < ‖x‖ₑ :=
exists_one_lt_nnnorm α |>.imp fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.mpr
theorem exists_lt_norm (r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ‖x‖ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw
⟨w ^ n, by rwa [norm_pow]⟩
theorem exists_lt_nnnorm (r : ℝ≥0) : ∃ x : α, r < ‖x‖₊ := exists_lt_norm α r
theorem exists_lt_enorm {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r ≠ ∞) : ∃ x : α, r < ‖x‖ₑ := by
lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
exact mod_cast exists_lt_nnnorm α r
theorem exists_norm_lt {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖ ∧ ‖x‖ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_lt_norm α r⁻¹
⟨w⁻¹, by rwa [← Set.mem_Ioo, norm_inv, ← Set.mem_inv, Set.inv_Ioo_0_left hr]⟩
theorem exists_nnnorm_lt {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖₊ ∧ ‖x‖₊ < r :=
exists_norm_lt α hr
/-- TODO: merge with `_root_.exists_enorm_lt`. -/
theorem exists_enorm_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖ₑ ∧ ‖x‖ₑ < r :=
match r with
| ∞ => exists_one_lt_enorm α |>.imp fun _ hx => ⟨zero_le_one.trans_lt hx, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
| (r : ℝ≥0) => exists_nnnorm_lt α (ENNReal.coe_pos.mp hr) |>.imp fun _ =>
And.imp ENNReal.coe_pos.mpr ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.mpr
theorem exists_norm_lt_one : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖ ∧ ‖x‖ < 1 :=
exists_norm_lt α one_pos
theorem exists_nnnorm_lt_one : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖₊ ∧ ‖x‖₊ < 1 := exists_norm_lt_one _
theorem exists_enorm_lt_one : ∃ x : α, 0 < ‖x‖ₑ ∧ ‖x‖ₑ < 1 := exists_enorm_lt _ one_pos
variable {α}
@[instance]
theorem nhdsNE_neBot (x : α) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, Metric.mem_closure_iff]
rintro ε ε0
rcases exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩
refine ⟨x + b, mt (Set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_eq_left).1 <| norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, ?_⟩
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias punctured_nhds_neBot := nhdsNE_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_isUnit_neBot : NeBot (𝓝[{ x : α | IsUnit x }] 0) := by
simpa only [isUnit_iff_ne_zero] using nhdsNE_neBot (0 : α)
end Nontrivially
section Densely
variable (α) [DenselyNormedField α]
theorem exists_lt_norm_lt {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h : r₁ < r₂) : ∃ x : α, r₁ < ‖x‖ ∧ ‖x‖ < r₂ :=
DenselyNormedField.lt_norm_lt r₁ r₂ h₀ h
theorem exists_lt_nnnorm_lt {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} (h : r₁ < r₂) : ∃ x : α, r₁ < ‖x‖₊ ∧ ‖x‖₊ < r₂ :=
mod_cast exists_lt_norm_lt α r₁.prop h
instance denselyOrdered_range_norm : DenselyOrdered (Set.range (norm : α → ℝ)) where
dense := by
rintro ⟨-, x, rfl⟩ ⟨-, y, rfl⟩ hxy
let ⟨z, h⟩ := exists_lt_norm_lt α (norm_nonneg _) hxy
exact ⟨⟨‖z‖, z, rfl⟩, h⟩
instance denselyOrdered_range_nnnorm : DenselyOrdered (Set.range (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0)) where
dense := by
rintro ⟨-, x, rfl⟩ ⟨-, y, rfl⟩ hxy
let ⟨z, h⟩ := exists_lt_nnnorm_lt α hxy
exact ⟨⟨‖z‖₊, z, rfl⟩, h⟩
end Densely
end NormedField
/-- A normed field is nontrivially normed
provided that the norm of some nonzero element is not one. -/
def NontriviallyNormedField.ofNormNeOne {𝕜 : Type*} [h' : NormedField 𝕜]
(h : ∃ x : 𝕜, x ≠ 0 ∧ ‖x‖ ≠ 1) : NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜 where
toNormedField := h'
non_trivial := by
rcases h with ⟨x, hx, hx1⟩
rcases hx1.lt_or_lt with hlt | hlt
· use x⁻¹
rw [norm_inv]
exact (one_lt_inv₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)).2 hlt
· exact ⟨x, hlt⟩
noncomputable instance Real.normedField : NormedField ℝ :=
{ Real.normedAddCommGroup, Real.field with
norm_mul := abs_mul }
noncomputable instance Real.denselyNormedField : DenselyNormedField ℝ where
lt_norm_lt _ _ h₀ hr :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := exists_between hr
⟨x, by rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (h₀.trans h.1.le)]⟩
namespace Real
theorem toNNReal_mul_nnnorm {x : ℝ} (y : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x.toNNReal * ‖y‖₊ = ‖x * y‖₊ := by
ext
simp only [NNReal.coe_mul, nnnorm_mul, coe_nnnorm, Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg, norm_of_nonneg, hx,
NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem nnnorm_mul_toNNReal (x : ℝ) {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) : ‖x‖₊ * y.toNNReal = ‖x * y‖₊ := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm x, toNNReal_mul_nnnorm x hy]
end Real
/-! ### Induced normed structures -/
section Induced
variable {F : Type*} (R S : Type*) [FunLike F R S]
/-- An injective non-unital ring homomorphism from a `DivisionRing` to a `NormedRing` induces a
`NormedDivisionRing` structure on the domain.
See note [reducible non-instances] -/
abbrev NormedDivisionRing.induced [DivisionRing R] [NormedDivisionRing S]
[NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) : NormedDivisionRing R :=
{ NormedAddCommGroup.induced R S f hf, ‹DivisionRing R› with
norm_mul x y := show ‖f _‖ = _ from (map_mul f x y).symm ▸ norm_mul (f x) (f y) }
/-- An injective non-unital ring homomorphism from a `Field` to a `NormedRing` induces a
`NormedField` structure on the domain.
See note [reducible non-instances] -/
abbrev NormedField.induced [Field R] [NormedField S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : NormedField R :=
{ NormedDivisionRing.induced R S f hf with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end Induced
namespace SubfieldClass
variable {S F : Type*} [SetLike S F]
/--
If `s` is a subfield of a normed field `F`, then `s` is equipped with an induced normed
field structure.
-/
instance toNormedField [NormedField F] [SubfieldClass S F] (s : S) : NormedField s :=
NormedField.induced s F (SubringClass.subtype s) Subtype.val_injective
end SubfieldClass
namespace AbsoluteValue
/-- A real absolute value on a field determines a `NormedField` structure. -/
noncomputable def toNormedField {K : Type*} [Field K] (v : AbsoluteValue K ℝ) : NormedField K where
toField := inferInstanceAs (Field K)
__ := v.toNormedRing
norm_mul := v.map_mul
end AbsoluteValue
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Field/Basic.lean | 849 | 851 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Eric Wieser, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# Basic facts about real (semi)normed spaces
In this file we prove some theorems about (semi)normed spaces over real numberes.
## Main results
- `closure_ball`, `frontier_ball`, `interior_closedBall`, `frontier_closedBall`, `interior_sphere`,
`frontier_sphere`: formulas for the closure/interior/frontier
of nontrivial balls and spheres in a real seminormed space;
- `interior_closedBall'`, `frontier_closedBall'`, `interior_sphere'`, `frontier_sphere'`:
similar lemmas assuming that the ambient space is separated and nontrivial instead of `r ≠ 0`.
-/
open Metric Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology
/-- If `E` is a nontrivial topological module over `ℝ`, then `E` has no isolated points.
This is a particular case of `Module.punctured_nhds_neBot`. -/
instance Real.punctured_nhds_module_neBot {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[ContinuousAdd E] [Nontrivial E] [Module ℝ E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E] (x : E) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
Module.punctured_nhds_neBot ℝ E x
section Seminormed
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem inv_norm_smul_mem_unitClosedBall (x : E) :
‖x‖⁻¹ • x ∈ closedBall (0 : E) 1 := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero_iff, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_norm, ← div_eq_inv_mul,
div_self_le_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias inv_norm_smul_mem_closed_unit_ball := inv_norm_smul_mem_unitClosedBall
theorem norm_smul_of_nonneg {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : E) : ‖t • x‖ = t * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
theorem dist_smul_add_one_sub_smul_le {r : ℝ} {x y : E} (h : r ∈ Icc 0 1) :
dist (r • x + (1 - r) • y) x ≤ dist y x :=
calc
dist (r • x + (1 - r) • y) x = ‖1 - r‖ * ‖x - y‖ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm', ← norm_smul, sub_smul, one_smul, smul_sub, ← sub_sub, ← sub_add,
sub_right_comm]
_ = (1 - r) * dist y x := by
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr (sub_nonneg.mpr h.2), dist_eq_norm']
_ ≤ (1 - 0) * dist y x := by gcongr; exact h.1
_ = dist y x := by rw [sub_zero, one_mul]
theorem closure_ball (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : closure (ball x r) = closedBall x r := by
refine Subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closedBall fun y hy => ?_
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun c : ℝ => c • (y - x) + x) (Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuousWithinAt
convert this.mem_closure _ _
· rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel]
· simp [closure_Ico zero_ne_one, zero_le_one]
· rintro c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r]
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm] at hy
replace hr : 0 < r := ((norm_nonneg _).trans hy).lt_of_ne hr.symm
apply mul_lt_mul' <;> assumption
theorem frontier_ball (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r := by
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, isOpen_ball.interior_eq, closedBall_diff_ball]
theorem interior_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
interior (closedBall x r) = ball x r := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with hr | hr
· rw [closedBall_eq_empty.2 hr, ball_eq_empty.2 hr.le, interior_empty]
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ ball_subset_interior_closedBall
intro y hy
rcases (mem_closedBall.1 <| interior_subset hy).lt_or_eq with (hr | rfl)
· exact hr
set f : ℝ → E := fun c : ℝ => c • (y - x) + x
suffices f ⁻¹' closedBall x (dist y x) ⊆ Icc (-1) 1 by
have hfc : Continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const
have hf1 : (1 : ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' interior (closedBall x <| dist y x) := by simpa [f]
have h1 : (1 : ℝ) ∈ interior (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1)
simp at h1
intro c hc
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr]
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
theorem frontier_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
frontier (closedBall x r) = sphere x r := by
rw [frontier, closure_closedBall, interior_closedBall x hr, closedBall_diff_ball]
theorem interior_sphere (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : interior (sphere x r) = ∅ := by
rw [← frontier_closedBall x hr, interior_frontier isClosed_closedBall]
theorem frontier_sphere (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : frontier (sphere x r) = sphere x r := by
rw [isClosed_sphere.frontier_eq, interior_sphere x hr, diff_empty]
| end Seminormed
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Real.lean | 106 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
induction' l with b l IH
· rw [map_nil, dlookup_nil, dlookup_nil, Option.map_none']
· rw [map_cons]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.map_some']
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ h, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ (fun he => h <| hf he), IH]
theorem dlookup_map₁ {β : Type v} (l : List (Σ _ : α, β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, x.2⟩ : List (Σ _ : α', β)).dlookup (f a) = l.dlookup a := by
rw [dlookup_map (β' := fun _ => β) l hf (fun _ x => x) a, Option.map_id']
theorem dlookup_map₂ {γ δ : α → Type*} {l : List (Σ a, γ a)} {f : ∀ a, γ a → δ a} (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨x.1, f _ x.2⟩ : List (Σ a, δ a)).dlookup a = (l.dlookup a).map (f a) :=
dlookup_map l Function.injective_id _ _
/-! ### `lookupAll` -/
/-- `lookup_all a l` is the list of all values in `l` corresponding to the key `a`. -/
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not, reduceCtorEq]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, lookupAll_cons_ne]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons _
theorem lookupAll_length_le_one (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
length (lookupAll a l) ≤ 1 := by
have := Nodup.sublist ((lookupAll_sublist a l).map _) h
rw [map_map] at this
rwa [← nodup_replicate, ← map_const]
theorem lookupAll_eq_dlookup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
lookupAll a l = (dlookup a l).toList := by
rw [← head?_lookupAll]
| have h1 := lookupAll_length_le_one a h; revert h1
rcases lookupAll a l with (_ | ⟨b, _ | ⟨c, l⟩⟩) <;> intro h1 <;> try rfl
exact absurd h1 (by simp)
theorem lookupAll_nodup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) : (lookupAll a l).Nodup := by
(rw [lookupAll_eq_dlookup a h]; apply Option.toList_nodup)
theorem perm_lookupAll (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookupAll a l₁ = lookupAll a l₂ := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 300 | 308 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Tower
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define several notions of finiteness that are common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Module.Finite`, `RingHom.Finite`, `AlgHom.Finite`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as module* over some base ring.
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
- `Algebra.FinitePresentation`, `RingHom.FinitePresentation`, `AlgHom.FinitePresentation`
all of these express that some object is finitely presented *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe w₁ w₂ w₃
-- Porting note: `M, N` is never used
variable (R : Type w₁) (A : Type w₂) (B : Type w₃)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is `Algebra.FinitePresentation` if it is the quotient of
a polynomial ring in `n` variables by a finitely generated ideal. -/
class Algebra.FinitePresentation [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f ∧ (RingHom.ker f.toRingHom).FG
namespace Algebra
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] [CommRing B] [Algebra R B]
namespace FiniteType
variable {R A B}
/-- A finitely presented algebra is of finite type. -/
instance of_finitePresentation [FinitePresentation R A] : FiniteType R A := by
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := FinitePresentation.out (R := R) (A := A)
apply FiniteType.iff_quotient_mvPolynomial''.2
exact ⟨n, f, hf.1⟩
end FiniteType
namespace FinitePresentation
variable {R A B}
/-- An algebra over a Noetherian ring is finitely generated if and only if it is finitely
presented. -/
theorem of_finiteType [IsNoetherianRing R] : FiniteType R A ↔ FinitePresentation R A := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hfp => Algebra.FiniteType.of_finitePresentation⟩
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := Algebra.FiniteType.iff_quotient_mvPolynomial''.1 h
refine ⟨n, f, hf, ?_⟩
have hnoet : IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) := by infer_instance
-- Porting note: rewrote code to help typeclass inference
rw [isNoetherianRing_iff] at hnoet
letI : Module (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) := Semiring.toModule
convert hnoet.noetherian (RingHom.ker f.toRingHom)
/-- If `e : A ≃ₐ[R] B` and `A` is finitely presented, then so is `B`. -/
theorem equiv [FinitePresentation R A] (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FinitePresentation R B := by
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := FinitePresentation.out (R := R) (A := A)
use n, AlgHom.comp (↑e) f
constructor
· rw [AlgHom.coe_comp]
exact Function.Surjective.comp e.surjective hf.1
suffices (RingHom.ker (AlgHom.comp (e : A →ₐ[R] B) f).toRingHom) = RingHom.ker f.toRingHom by
rw [this]
exact hf.2
have hco : (AlgHom.comp (e : A →ₐ[R] B) f).toRingHom = RingHom.comp (e.toRingEquiv : A ≃+* B)
f.toRingHom := by
have h : (AlgHom.comp (e : A →ₐ[R] B) f).toRingHom =
e.toAlgHom.toRingHom.comp f.toRingHom := rfl
have h1 : ↑e.toRingEquiv = e.toAlgHom.toRingHom := rfl
rw [h, h1]
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, hco, ← Ideal.comap_comap, ← RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot,
RingHom.ker_coe_equiv (AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv e), RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
variable (R)
/-- The ring of polynomials in finitely many variables is finitely presented. -/
protected instance mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
FinitePresentation R (MvPolynomial ι R) where
out := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
let eqv := (MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R <| Fintype.equivFin ι).symm
exact
⟨Fintype.card ι, eqv, eqv.surjective,
((RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot _).1 eqv.injective).symm ▸ Submodule.fg_bot⟩
/-- `R` is finitely presented as `R`-algebra. -/
instance self : FinitePresentation R R :=
-- Porting note: replaced `PEmpty` with `Empty`
equiv (MvPolynomial.isEmptyAlgEquiv R Empty)
/-- `R[X]` is finitely presented as `R`-algebra. -/
instance polynomial : FinitePresentation R R[X] :=
-- Porting note: replaced `PUnit` with `Unit`
letI := FinitePresentation.mvPolynomial R Unit
equiv (MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R)
variable {R}
/-- The quotient of a finitely presented algebra by a finitely generated ideal is finitely
presented. -/
protected theorem quotient {I : Ideal A} (h : I.FG) [FinitePresentation R A] :
FinitePresentation R (A ⧸ I) where
out := by
obtain ⟨n, f, hf⟩ := FinitePresentation.out (R := R) (A := A)
refine ⟨n, (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp f, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R I).comp hf.1
· refine Ideal.fg_ker_comp _ _ hf.2 ?_ hf.1
simp [h]
/-- If `f : A →ₐ[R] B` is surjective with finitely generated kernel and `A` is finitely presented,
then so is `B`. -/
theorem of_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(hker : (RingHom.ker f.toRingHom).FG)
[FinitePresentation R A] : FinitePresentation R B :=
letI : FinitePresentation R (A ⧸ RingHom.ker f) := FinitePresentation.quotient hker
equiv (Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective hf)
theorem iff :
FinitePresentation R A ↔
∃ (n : _) (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) (_ : (_ ⧸ I) ≃ₐ[R] A), I.FG := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, f, hf⟩
exact ⟨n, RingHom.ker f.toRingHom, Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfSurjective hf.1, hf.2⟩
· rintro ⟨n, I, e, hfg⟩
letI := (FinitePresentation.mvPolynomial R _).quotient hfg
exact equiv e
/-- An algebra is finitely presented if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring whose
variables are indexed by a fintype by a finitely generated ideal. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' :
FinitePresentation R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type*) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] A),
Surjective f ∧ (RingHom.ker f.toRingHom).FG := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, f, hfs, hfk⟩
set ulift_var := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R Equiv.ulift
refine
⟨ULift (Fin n), inferInstance, f.comp ulift_var.toAlgHom, hfs.comp ulift_var.surjective,
Ideal.fg_ker_comp _ _ ?_ hfk ulift_var.surjective⟩
| simpa using Submodule.fg_bot
· rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, f, hf⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
use Fintype.card ι, f.comp equiv.symm, hf.1.comp (AlgEquiv.symm equiv).surjective
refine Ideal.fg_ker_comp (S := MvPolynomial ι R) (A := A) _ f ?_ hf.2 equiv.symm.surjective
simpa using Submodule.fg_bot
universe v in
-- Porting note: make universe level explicit to ensure `ι, ι'` has the same universe level
/-- If `A` is a finitely presented `R`-algebra, then `MvPolynomial (Fin n) A` is finitely presented
as `R`-algebra. -/
theorem mvPolynomial_of_finitePresentation [FinitePresentation.{w₁, w₂} R A]
(ι : Type v) [Finite ι] :
FinitePresentation.{w₁, max v w₂} R (MvPolynomial ι A) := by
have hfp : FinitePresentation.{w₁, w₂} R A := inferInstance
rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'] at hfp ⊢
classical
-- Porting note: use the same universe level
obtain ⟨(ι' : Type v), _, f, hf_surj, hf_ker⟩ := hfp
let g := (MvPolynomial.mapAlgHom f).comp (MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv R ι ι').toAlgHom
cases nonempty_fintype (ι ⊕ ι')
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FinitePresentation.lean | 161 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-!
# Separable polynomials
We define a polynomial to be separable if it is coprime with its derivative. We prove basic
properties about separable polynomials here.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Separable f`: a polynomial `f` is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative.
* `IsSeparable K x`: an element `x` is separable over `K` iff the minimal polynomial of `x`
over `K` is separable.
* `Algebra.IsSeparable K L`: `L` is separable over `K` iff every element in `L` is separable
over `K`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
/-- A polynomial is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative. -/
@[stacks 09H1 "first part"]
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_mul_right {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : g.Separable := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_mul_left
theorem Separable.of_dvd {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hfg : g ∣ f) : g.Separable := by
rcases hfg with ⟨f', rfl⟩
exact Separable.of_mul_left hf
theorem separable_gcd_left {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{f : F[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (g : F[X]) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
theorem separable_gcd_right {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{g : F[X]} (f : F[X]) (hg : g.Separable) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
theorem Separable.isCoprime {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : IsCoprime f g := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_pow' {f : R[X]} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (_h : (f ^ n).Separable), IsUnit f ∨ f.Separable ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0
| 0 => fun _h => Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
| 1 => fun h => Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨pow_one f ▸ h, rfl⟩
| n + 2 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ] at h
exact Or.inl (isCoprime_self.1 h.isCoprime.of_mul_left_right)
theorem Separable.of_pow {f : R[X]} (hf : ¬IsUnit f) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hfs : (f ^ n).Separable) : f.Separable ∧ n = 1 :=
(hfs.of_pow'.resolve_left hf).resolve_right hn
theorem Separable.map {p : R[X]} (h : p.Separable) {f : R →+* S} : (p.map f).Separable :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a.map f, b.map f, by
rw [derivative_map, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, H,
Polynomial.map_one]⟩
theorem _root_.Associated.separable {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) (h : f.Separable) : g.Separable := by
obtain ⟨⟨u, v, h1, h2⟩, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a * v + b * derivative v, b * v, ?_⟩
replace h := congr($h * $(h1))
have h3 := congr(derivative $(h1))
simp only [← ha, derivative_mul, derivative_one] at h3 ⊢
calc
_ = (a * f + b * derivative f) * (u * v)
+ (b * f) * (derivative u * v + u * derivative v) := by ring1
_ = 1 := by rw [h, h3]; ring1
theorem _root_.Associated.separable_iff {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) : f.Separable ↔ g.Separable := ⟨ha.separable, ha.symm.separable⟩
theorem Separable.mul_unit {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : IsUnit g) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_mul_unit_right f g hg).separable hf
theorem Separable.unit_mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : IsUnit f) (hg : g.Separable) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_unit_mul_right g f hf).separable hg
theorem Separable.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(derivative p).eval₂ f x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx'
obtain ⟨a, b, e⟩ := h
apply_fun Polynomial.eval₂ f x at e
simp only [eval₂_add, eval₂_mul, hx, mul_zero, hx', add_zero, eval₂_one, zero_ne_one] at e
theorem Separable.aeval_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
aeval x (derivative p) ≠ 0 :=
h.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero (algebraMap R S) hx
variable (p q : ℕ)
theorem isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable {p q : R[X]} (hp : p.Separable) (hq : q * q ∣ p) :
IsUnit q := by
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := hq
apply isCoprime_self.mp
have : IsCoprime (q * (q * p))
(q * (derivative q * p + derivative q * p + q * derivative p)) := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add]
dsimp only [Separable] at hp
convert hp using 1
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_mul]
ring
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left this)
theorem emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable {p q : R[X]} (hq : ¬IsUnit q) (hsep : Separable p) :
emultiplicity q p ≤ 1 := by
contrapose! hq
apply isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hsep
rw [← sq]
apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
exact Order.add_one_le_of_lt hq
/-- A separable polynomial is square-free.
See `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree` for the converse when the coefficients are a perfect
field. -/
theorem Separable.squarefree {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : Squarefree p := by
classical
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one p]
| exact fun f => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun hunit => emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable hunit hsep
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem separable_X_sub_C {x : R} : Separable (X - C x) := by
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 189 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
/-!
# Trails and Eulerian trails
This module contains additional theory about trails, including Eulerian trails (also known
as Eulerian circuits).
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian` is the predicate that a trail is an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff` gives a condition on the number of edges
in a trail that can be incident to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.even_degree_iff` gives a condition on the degrees of vertices
when there exists an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` gives the possible numbers of odd-degree
vertices when there exists an Eulerian trail.
## TODO
* Prove that there exists an Eulerian trail when the conclusion to
`SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` holds.
## Tags
Eulerian trails
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} {G : SimpleGraph V}
namespace Walk
/-- The edges of a trail as a finset, since each edge in a trail appears exactly once. -/
abbrev IsTrail.edgesFinset {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail) : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
⟨p.edges, h.edges_nodup⟩
variable [DecidableEq V]
theorem IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsTrail) (x : V) :
Even (p.edges.countP fun e => x ∈ e) ↔ u ≠ v → x ≠ u ∧ x ≠ v := by
induction p with
| | nil => simp
| cons huv p ih =>
rw [cons_isTrail_iff] at ht
specialize ih ht.1
simp only [List.countP_cons, Ne, edges_cons, Sym2.mem_iff]
split_ifs with h
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq] at h
obtain (rfl | rfl) := h
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih]
simp only [huv.ne, imp_false, Ne, not_false_iff, true_and, not_forall,
Classical.not_not, exists_prop, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
and_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro rfl rfl
exact G.loopless _ huv
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [huv.ne.symm, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and, not_forall,
not_false_iff, exists_prop, and_true, Classical.not_not, true_and, iff_and_self]
rintro rfl
exact huv.ne
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq, not_or] at h
simp only [h.1, h.2, not_false_iff, true_and, add_zero, Ne] at ih ⊢
rw [ih]
constructor <;>
· rintro h' h'' rfl
simp only [imp_false, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Classical.not_not] at h'
cases h'
simp only [not_true, and_false, false_and] at h
/-- An *Eulerian trail* (also known as an "Eulerian path") is a walk
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Trails.lean | 53 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Chebyshev
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
/-!
# Numerical bounds for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
This file gathers the numerical facts required by the proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.stepBound`: During the inductive step, a partition of size `n` is blown to
size at most `stepBound n`.
* `SzemerediRegularity.initialBound`: The size of the partition we start the induction with.
* `SzemerediRegularity.bound`: The upper bound on the size of the partition produced by our version
of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function Real
namespace SzemerediRegularity
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. Blowing up a partition of size `n` during
the induction results in a partition of size at most `stepBound n`. -/
def stepBound (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
n * 4 ^ n
theorem le_stepBound : id ≤ stepBound := fun n =>
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| pow_pos (by norm_num) n
theorem stepBound_mono : Monotone stepBound := fun _ _ h =>
Nat.mul_le_mul h <| Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) h
theorem stepBound_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < stepBound n ↔ 0 < n :=
mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right <| by positivity
alias ⟨_, stepBound_pos⟩ := stepBound_pos_iff
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_stepBound {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) :
(stepBound n : α) = n * 4 ^ n := by unfold stepBound; norm_cast
end SzemerediRegularity
open SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
{u : Finset α} {ε : ℝ}
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
local notation3 "a" => (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts : ℕ)
namespace SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
private theorem eps_pos {ε : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ n * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_right ((show 0 < (100 : ℝ) by norm_num).trans_le h) (by positivity))
private theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m :=
Nat.div_pos (hPα.trans' <| by unfold stepBound; gcongr; norm_num) <|
stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <| univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos
/-- Local extension for the `positivity` tactic: A few facts that are needed many times for the
proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. -/
scoped macro "sz_positivity" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ try have := m_pos ‹_›
try have := eps_pos ‹_›
positivity })
-- Original meta code
/- meta def positivity_szemeredi_regularity : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%n / step_bound (finpartition.parts %%P).card) := do
p ← to_expr
``((finpartition.parts %%P).card * 16^(finpartition.parts %%P).card ≤ %%n)
>>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``m_pos [p]
| ε := do
typ ← infer_type ε,
unify typ `(ℝ),
p ← to_expr ``(100 ≤ 4 ^ _ * %%ε ^ 5) >>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``eps_pos [p] -/
end SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m := by
sz_positivity
theorem coe_m_add_one_pos : 0 < (m : ℝ) + 1 := by positivity
theorem one_le_m_coe [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : (1 : ℝ) ≤ m :=
Nat.one_le_cast.2 <| m_pos hPα
| theorem eps_pow_five_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : ↑0 < ε ^ 5 :=
pos_of_mul_pos_right ((by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 100).trans_le hPε) <| pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Bound.lean | 111 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.NoAtoms
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real.Lemmas
/-!
# Borel (measurable) spaces ℝ, ℝ≥0, ℝ≥0∞
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx_rat` (where Ixx is one of {Ioo, Ioi, Iio, Ici, Iic):
the Borel sigma algebra on ℝ is generated by intervals with rational endpoints;
* `isPiSystem_Ixx_rat` (where Ixx is one of {Ioo, Ioi, Iio, Ici, Iic):
intervals with rational endpoints form a pi system on ℝ;
* `measurable_real_toNNReal`, `measurable_coe_nnreal_real`, `measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal`,
`ENNReal.measurable_ofReal`, `ENNReal.measurable_toReal`:
measurability of various coercions between ℝ, ℝ≥0, and ℝ≥0∞;
* `Measurable.real_toNNReal`, `Measurable.coe_nnreal_real`, `Measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal`,
`Measurable.ennreal_ofReal`, `Measurable.ennreal_toNNReal`, `Measurable.ennreal_toReal`:
measurability of functions composed with various coercions between ℝ, ℝ≥0, and ℝ≥0∞
(also similar results for a.e.-measurability);
* `Measurable.ennreal*` : measurability of special cases for arithmetic operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
namespace Real
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioo_rat :
borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ (a : ℚ) (b : ℚ) (_ : a < b), {Ioo (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ)}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_Ioo_rat.borel_eq_generateFrom
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iio (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine le_antisymm
(generateFrom_le ?_)
(generateFrom_mono <| iUnion_subset fun q ↦ singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| mem_range_self _)
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
have : IsLUB (range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ∩ Iio a) a := by
simp [isLUB_iff_le_iff, mem_upperBounds, ← le_iff_forall_rat_lt_imp_le]
rw [← this.biUnion_Iio_eq, ← image_univ, ← image_inter_preimage, univ_inter, biUnion_image]
exact MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable _)
fun b _ => GenerateMeasurable.basic (Iio (b : ℝ)) (by simp)
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Ioi (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm
(generateFrom_le ?_)
(generateFrom_mono <| iUnion_subset fun q ↦ singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| mem_range_self _)
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
have : IsGLB (range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ∩ Ioi a) a := by
simp [isGLB_iff_le_iff, mem_lowerBounds, ← le_iff_forall_lt_rat_imp_le]
rw [← this.biUnion_Ioi_eq, ← image_univ, ← image_inter_preimage, univ_inter, biUnion_image]
exact MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable _)
fun b _ => GenerateMeasurable.basic (Ioi (b : ℝ)) (by simp)
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Iic (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi_rat, iUnion_singleton_eq_range, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_le ?_) <;>
rintro _ ⟨q, rfl⟩ <;>
dsimp only <;>
[rw [← compl_Iic]; rw [← compl_Ioi]] <;>
exact MeasurableSet.compl (GenerateMeasurable.basic _ (mem_range_self q))
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici_rat : borel ℝ = .generateFrom (⋃ a : ℚ, {Ici (a : ℝ)}) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio_rat, iUnion_singleton_eq_range, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_le ?_) <;>
rintro _ ⟨q, rfl⟩ <;>
dsimp only <;>
[rw [← compl_Ici]; rw [← compl_Iio]] <;>
exact MeasurableSet.compl (GenerateMeasurable.basic _ (mem_range_self q))
| theorem isPiSystem_Ioo_rat :
IsPiSystem (⋃ (a : ℚ) (b : ℚ) (_ : a < b), {Ioo (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ)}) := by
convert isPiSystem_Ioo ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ) ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
ext x
simp [eq_comm]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Real.lean | 84 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Subsingleton filters
We say that a filter `l` is a *subsingleton* if there exists a subsingleton set `s ∈ l`.
Equivalently, `l` is either `⊥` or `pure a` for some `a`.
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α}
namespace Filter
/-- We say that a filter is a *subsingleton* if there exists a subsingleton set
that belongs to the filter. -/
protected def Subsingleton (l : Filter α) : Prop := ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Subsingleton s
theorem HasBasis.subsingleton_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : l.HasBasis p s) :
l.Subsingleton ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ (s i).Subsingleton :=
h.exists_iff fun _ _ hsub h ↦ h.anti hsub
theorem Subsingleton.anti {l'} (hl : l.Subsingleton) (hl' : l' ≤ l) : l'.Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; ⟨s, hl' hsl, hs⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem Subsingleton.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : l.Subsingleton :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, subsingleton_univ⟩
theorem Subsingleton.map (hl : l.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (map f l).Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; ⟨f '' s, image_mem_map hsl, hs.image f⟩
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hl : l.Subsingleton) {l' : Filter β} (hl' : l'.Subsingleton) :
(l ×ˢ l').Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; let ⟨t, htl', ht⟩ := hl'; ⟨s ×ˢ t, prod_mem_prod hsl htl', hs.prod ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_pure {a : α} : Filter.Subsingleton (pure a) :=
⟨{a}, rfl, subsingleton_singleton⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_bot : Filter.Subsingleton (⊥ : Filter α) :=
⟨∅, trivial, subsingleton_empty⟩
/-- A nontrivial subsingleton filter is equal to `pure a` for some `a`. -/
theorem Subsingleton.exists_eq_pure [l.NeBot] (hl : l.Subsingleton) : ∃ a, l = pure a := by
rcases hl with ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩
rcases exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨nonempty_of_mem hsl, hs⟩ with ⟨a, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a, (NeBot.le_pure_iff ‹_›).1 ?_⟩
rwa [le_pure_iff]
/-- A filter is a subsingleton iff it is equal to `⊥` or to `pure a` for some `a`. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_bot_or_pure : l.Subsingleton ↔ l = ⊥ ∨ ∃ a, l = pure a := by
refine ⟨fun hl ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (eq_or_neBot l).imp_right (@Subsingleton.exists_eq_pure _ _ · hl)
· rintro (rfl | ⟨a, rfl⟩) <;> simp
/-- In a nonempty type, a filter is a subsingleton iff
it is less than or equal to a pure filter. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_exists_le_pure [Nonempty α] : l.Subsingleton ↔ ∃ a, l ≤ pure a := by
rcases eq_or_neBot l with rfl | hbot
· simp
· simp [subsingleton_iff_bot_or_pure, ← hbot.le_pure_iff, hbot.ne]
theorem subsingleton_iff_exists_singleton_mem [Nonempty α] : l.Subsingleton ↔ ∃ a, {a} ∈ l := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff_exists_le_pure, le_pure_iff]
/-- A subsingleton filter on a nonempty type is less than or equal to `pure a` for some `a`. -/
alias ⟨Subsingleton.exists_le_pure, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_exists_le_pure
|
lemma Subsingleton.isCountablyGenerated (hl : l.Subsingleton) : IsCountablyGenerated l := by
rcases subsingleton_iff_bot_or_pure.1 hl with rfl|⟨x, rfl⟩
· exact isCountablyGenerated_bot
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Subsingleton.lean | 76 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
/-!
# Filters with countable intersection property
In this file we define `CountableInterFilter` to be the class of filters with the following
property: for any countable collection of sets `s ∈ l` their intersection belongs to `l` as well.
Two main examples are the `residual` filter defined in `Mathlib.Topology.GDelta` and
the `MeasureTheory.ae` filter defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure/AE`.
We reformulate the definition in terms of indexed intersection and in terms of `Filter.Eventually`
and provide instances for some basic constructions (`⊥`, `⊤`, `Filter.principal`, `Filter.map`,
`Filter.comap`, `Inf.inf`). We also provide a custom constructor `Filter.ofCountableInter`
that deduces two axioms of a `Filter` from the countable intersection property.
Note that there also exists a typeclass `CardinalInterFilter`, and thus an alternative spelling of
`CountableInterFilter` as `CardinalInterFilter l ℵ₁`. The former (defined here) is the
preferred spelling; it has the advantage of not requiring the user to import the theory of ordinals.
## Tags
filter, countable
-/
open Set Filter
open Filter
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
/-- A filter `l` has the countable intersection property if for any countable collection
of sets `s ∈ l` their intersection belongs to `l` as well. -/
class CountableInterFilter (l : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- For a countable collection of sets `s ∈ l`, their intersection belongs to `l` as well. -/
countable_sInter_mem : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋂₀ S ∈ l
variable {l : Filter α} [CountableInterFilter l]
theorem countable_sInter_mem {S : Set (Set α)} (hSc : S.Countable) : ⋂₀ S ∈ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l :=
⟨fun hS _s hs => mem_of_superset hS (sInter_subset_of_mem hs),
CountableInterFilter.countable_sInter_mem _ hSc⟩
theorem countable_iInter_mem [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ l :=
sInter_range s ▸ (countable_sInter_mem (countable_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
theorem countable_bInter_mem {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {s : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} :
(⋂ i, ⋂ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_›) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, ∀ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_› ∈ l := by
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.toEncodable
exact countable_iInter_mem.trans Subtype.forall
theorem eventually_countable_forall [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p x i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p x i := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using
@countable_iInter_mem _ _ l _ _ fun i => { x | p x i }
theorem eventually_countable_ball {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
| {p : α → ∀ i ∈ S, Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i hi, p x i hi) ↔ ∀ i hi, ∀ᶠ x in l, p x i hi := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using
@countable_bInter_mem _ l _ _ _ hS fun i hi => { x | p x i hi }
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableInter.lean | 65 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
/-!
# Trace of a matrix
This file defines the trace of a matrix, the map sending a matrix to the sum of its diagonal
entries.
See also `LinearAlgebra.Trace` for the trace of an endomorphism.
## Tags
matrix, trace, diagonal
-/
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {ι m n p : Type*} {α R S : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [Fintype p]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid R]
/-- The trace of a square matrix. For more bundled versions, see:
* `Matrix.traceAddMonoidHom`
* `Matrix.traceLinearMap`
-/
def trace (A : Matrix n n R) : R :=
∑ i, diag A i
lemma trace_diagonal {o} [Fintype o] [DecidableEq o] (d : o → R) :
trace (diagonal d) = ∑ i, d i := by
simp only [trace, diag_apply, diagonal_apply_eq]
variable (n R)
@[simp]
theorem trace_zero : trace (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(Finset.sum_const (0 : R)).trans <| smul_zero _
variable {n R}
@[simp]
lemma trace_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] (A : Matrix n n R) : trace A = 0 := by simp [trace]
@[simp]
theorem trace_add (A B : Matrix n n R) : trace (A + B) = trace A + trace B :=
Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[simp]
theorem trace_smul [DistribSMul α R] (r : α) (A : Matrix n n R) :
trace (r • A) = r • trace A :=
Finset.smul_sum.symm
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose (A : Matrix n n R) : trace Aᵀ = trace A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trace_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid R] (A : Matrix n n R) : trace Aᴴ = star (trace A) :=
(star_sum _ _).symm
variable (n α R)
/-- `Matrix.trace` as an `AddMonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def traceAddMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →+ R where
toFun := trace
map_zero' := trace_zero n R
map_add' := trace_add
/-- `Matrix.trace` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def traceLinearMap [Semiring α] [Module α R] : Matrix n n R →ₗ[α] R where
toFun := trace
map_add' := trace_add
map_smul' := trace_smul
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem trace_list_sum (l : List (Matrix n n R)) : trace l.sum = (l.map trace).sum :=
map_list_sum (traceAddMonoidHom n R) l
@[simp]
theorem trace_multiset_sum (s : Multiset (Matrix n n R)) : trace s.sum = (s.map trace).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (traceAddMonoidHom n R) s
@[simp]
theorem trace_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n R) :
trace (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, trace (f i) :=
map_sum (traceAddMonoidHom n R) f s
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.map_trace [AddCommMonoid S] {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S]
[AddMonoidHomClass F R S] (f : F) (A : Matrix n n R) :
f (trace A) = trace ((f : R →+ S).mapMatrix A) :=
map_sum f (fun i => diag A i) Finset.univ
lemma trace_blockDiagonal [DecidableEq p] (M : p → Matrix n n R) :
trace (blockDiagonal M) = ∑ i, trace (M i) := by
simp [blockDiagonal, trace, Finset.sum_comm (γ := n), Fintype.sum_prod_type]
lemma trace_blockDiagonal' [DecidableEq p] {m : p → Type*} [∀ i, Fintype (m i)]
(M : ∀ i, Matrix (m i) (m i) R) :
trace (blockDiagonal' M) = ∑ i, trace (M i) := by
simp [blockDiagonal', trace, Finset.sum_sigma']
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup R]
|
@[simp]
theorem trace_sub (A B : Matrix n n R) : trace (A - B) = trace A - trace B :=
Finset.sum_sub_distrib
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean | 126 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x : Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
rcases destruct (f a) with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
rcases destruct c with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp
· simpa using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
simpa using bind_pure id s
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp only [BisimO, ret_bind]; generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· rcases destruct (g t) with b | cb <;> simp
· simpa [BisimO] using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
obtain ⟨m', h⟩ := of_results_think h1
obtain ⟨h1, e⟩ := h
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction k generalizing s with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _
<;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
| · simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 694 | 695 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
| Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 53 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Translations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
/-!
# Basic Translation Lemmas Between Structures Defined for Computing Continued Fractions
## Summary
This is a collection of simple lemmas between the different structures used for the computation
of continued fractions defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Basic`.
The file consists of three sections:
1. Recurrences and inversion lemmas for `IntFractPair.stream`: these lemmas give us inversion
rules and recurrences for the computation of the stream of integer and fractional parts of
a value.
2. Translation lemmas for the head term: these lemmas show us that the head term of the computed
continued fraction of a value `v` is `⌊v⌋` and how this head term is moved along the structures
used in the computation process.
3. Translation lemmas for the sequence: these lemmas show how the sequences of the involved
structures (`IntFractPair.stream`, `IntFractPair.seq1`, and `GenContFract.of`) are connected,
i.e. how the values are moved along the structures and the termination of one sequence implies
the termination of another sequence.
## Main Theorems
- `succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff` gives as a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence
of integer and fractional parts of a value in case of non-termination.
- `succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff` gives as a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence
of integer and fractional parts of a value in case of termination.
- `get?_of_eq_some_of_succ_get?_intFractPair_stream` and
`get?_of_eq_some_of_get?_intFractPair_stream_fr_ne_zero` show how the entries of the sequence
of the computed continued fraction can be obtained from the stream of integer and fractional
parts.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
namespace GenContFract
open GenContFract (of)
-- Fix a discrete linear ordered division ring with `floor` function and a value `v`.
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [LinearOrder K] [FloorRing K] {v : K}
namespace IntFractPair
/-!
### Recurrences and Inversion Lemmas for `IntFractPair.stream`
Here we state some lemmas that give us inversion rules and recurrences for the computation of the
stream of integer and fractional parts of a value.
-/
theorem stream_zero (v : K) : IntFractPair.stream v 0 = some (IntFractPair.of v) :=
rfl
variable {n : ℕ}
theorem stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero {ifp_n : IntFractPair K}
(stream_nth_eq : IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp_n) (nth_fr_eq_zero : ifp_n.fr = 0) :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = none := by
obtain ⟨_, fr⟩ := ifp_n
change fr = 0 at nth_fr_eq_zero
simp [IntFractPair.stream, stream_nth_eq, nth_fr_eq_zero]
/-- Gives a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence of integer and fractional
parts of a value in case of termination.
-/
theorem succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = none ↔
IntFractPair.stream v n = none ∨ ∃ ifp, IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp ∧ ifp.fr = 0 := by
rw [IntFractPair.stream]
cases IntFractPair.stream v n <;> simp [imp_false]
/-- Gives a recurrence to compute the `n + 1`th value of the sequence of integer and fractional
parts of a value in case of non-termination.
-/
theorem succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff {ifp_succ_n : IntFractPair K} :
IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some ifp_succ_n ↔
∃ ifp_n : IntFractPair K,
IntFractPair.stream v n = some ifp_n ∧
ifp_n.fr ≠ 0 ∧ IntFractPair.of ifp_n.fr⁻¹ = ifp_succ_n := by
simp [IntFractPair.stream, ite_eq_iff, Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
/-- An easier to use version of one direction of
`GenContFract.IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff`. -/
theorem stream_succ_of_some {p : IntFractPair K} (h : IntFractPair.stream v n = some p)
(h' : p.fr ≠ 0) : IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some (IntFractPair.of p.fr⁻¹) :=
succ_nth_stream_eq_some_iff.mpr ⟨p, h, h', rfl⟩
/-- The stream of `IntFractPair`s of an integer stops after the first term.
-/
theorem stream_succ_of_int [IsStrictOrderedRing K] (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
IntFractPair.stream (a : K) (n + 1) = none := by
induction n with
| zero =>
refine IntFractPair.stream_eq_none_of_fr_eq_zero (IntFractPair.stream_zero (a : K)) ?_
simp only [IntFractPair.of, Int.fract_intCast]
| | succ n ih => exact IntFractPair.succ_nth_stream_eq_none_iff.mpr (Or.inl ih)
theorem exists_succ_nth_stream_of_fr_zero {ifp_succ_n : IntFractPair K}
(stream_succ_nth_eq : IntFractPair.stream v (n + 1) = some ifp_succ_n)
(succ_nth_fr_eq_zero : ifp_succ_n.fr = 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/Translations.lean | 105 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-! # Formal power series (in one variable) - Order
The `PowerSeries.order` of a formal power series `φ` is the multiplicity of the variable `X` in `φ`.
If the coefficients form an integral domain, then `PowerSeries.order` is an
additive valuation (`PowerSeries.order_mul`, `PowerSeries.min_order_le_order_add`).
We prove that if the commutative ring `R` of coefficients is an integral domain,
then the ring `R⟦X⟧` of formal power series in one variable over `R`
is an integral domain.
Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divided_by_X_pow_order f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order. This is useful when
proving that `R⟦X⟧` is a normalization monoid, which is done in `PowerSeries.Inverse`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section OrderBasic
variable [Semiring R] {φ : R⟦X⟧}
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero : (∃ n : ℕ, coeff R n φ ≠ 0) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
refine not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
simp [(coeff R _).map_zero]
/-- The order of a formal power series `φ` is the greatest `n : PartENat`
such that `X^n` divides `φ`. The order is `⊤` if and only if `φ = 0`. -/
def order (φ : R⟦X⟧) : ℕ∞ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
letI := Classical.decEq R⟦X⟧
if h : φ = 0 then ⊤ else Nat.find (exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mpr h)
/-- The order of the `0` power series is infinite. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : R⟦X⟧) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem order_finite_iff_ne_zero : (order φ < ⊤) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [order]
split_ifs with h <;> simpa
/-- The `0` power series is the unique power series with infinite order. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_eq_top {φ : R⟦X⟧} : φ.order = ⊤ ↔ φ = 0 := by
simpa using order_finite_iff_ne_zero.not_left
theorem coe_toNat_order {φ : R⟦X⟧} (hf : φ ≠ 0) : φ.order.toNat = φ.order := by
rw [ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self.mpr (order_eq_top.not.mpr hf)]
/-- If the order of a formal power series is finite,
then the coefficient indexed by the order is nonzero. -/
theorem coeff_order (h : φ ≠ 0) : coeff R φ.order.toNat φ ≠ 0 := by
classical
simp only [order, h, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
generalize_proofs h
exact Nat.find_spec h
/-- If the `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is nonzero,
then the order of the power series is less than or equal to `n`. -/
theorem order_le (n : ℕ) (h : coeff R n φ ≠ 0) : order φ ≤ n := by
classical
rw [order, dif_neg]
· simpa using ⟨n, le_rfl, h⟩
· exact exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mp ⟨n, h⟩
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is `0` if `n` is strictly
smaller than the order of the power series. -/
theorem coeff_of_lt_order (n : ℕ) (h : ↑n < order φ) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact order_le _ h
theorem coeff_of_lt_order_toNat (n : ℕ) (h : n < φ.order.toNat) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
by_cases h' : φ = 0
· simp [h']
· refine coeff_of_lt_order _ ?_
rwa [← coe_toNat_order h', ENat.coe_lt_coe]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem nat_le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ i < n, coeff R i φ = 0) : ↑n ≤ order φ := by
classical
simp only [order]
split_ifs
· simp
· simpa [Nat.le_find_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ∞) (h : ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :
n ≤ order φ := by
cases n with
| top => simpa using ext (by simpa using h)
| coe n =>
convert nat_le_order φ n _
simpa using h
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem order_eq_nat {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} :
order φ = n ↔ coeff R n φ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ i, i < n → coeff R i φ = 0 := by
classical
rcases eq_or_ne φ 0 with (rfl | hφ)
· simp
simp [order, dif_neg hφ, Nat.find_eq_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem order_eq {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ∞} :
order φ = n ↔ (∀ i : ℕ, ↑i = n → coeff R i φ ≠ 0) ∧ ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0 := by
cases n with
| top => simp [ext_iff]
| coe n => simp [order_eq_nat]
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is at least the minimum of their orders. -/
theorem min_order_le_order_add (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : min (order φ) (order ψ) ≤ order (φ + ψ) := by
refine le_order _ _ ?_
simp +contextual [coeff_of_lt_order]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-12")] alias le_order_add := min_order_le_order_add
private theorem order_add_of_order_eq.aux (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧)
(H : order φ < order ψ) : order (φ + ψ) ≤ order φ ⊓ order ψ := by
suffices order (φ + ψ) = order φ by
rw [le_inf_iff, this]
exact ⟨le_rfl, le_of_lt H⟩
rw [order_eq]
constructor
· intro i hi
rw [← hi] at H
rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order i H, add_zero]
exact (order_eq_nat.1 hi.symm).1
· intro i hi
rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order i hi, coeff_of_lt_order i (lt_trans hi H),
zero_add]
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is the minimum of their orders if their orders differ. -/
theorem order_add_of_order_eq (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) (h : order φ ≠ order ψ) :
order (φ + ψ) = order φ ⊓ order ψ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (min_order_le_order_add _ _)
rcases h.lt_or_lt with (φ_lt_ψ | ψ_lt_φ)
· apply order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ φ_lt_ψ
· simpa only [add_comm, inf_comm] using order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ ψ_lt_φ
/-- The order of the product of two formal power series
is at least the sum of their orders. -/
theorem le_order_mul (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : order φ + order ψ ≤ order (φ * ψ) := by
apply le_order
intro n hn; rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
by_cases hi : ↑i < order φ
· rw [coeff_of_lt_order i hi, zero_mul]
by_cases hj : ↑j < order ψ
· rw [coeff_of_lt_order j hj, mul_zero]
rw [not_lt] at hi hj; rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hij
exfalso
apply ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hn <| add_le_add hi hj)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, hij]
theorem le_order_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : n • order φ ≤ order (φ ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
simp only [add_smul, one_smul, pow_succ]
apply le_trans _ (le_order_mul _ _)
exact add_le_add_right hn φ.order
alias order_mul_ge := le_order_mul
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is infinite if `a = 0` and `n` otherwise. -/
theorem order_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) [Decidable (a = 0)] :
order (monomial R n a) = if a = 0 then (⊤ : ℕ∞) else n := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, order_eq_top, LinearMap.map_zero]
· rw [order_eq]
constructor <;> intro i hi
· simp only [Nat.cast_inj] at hi
rwa [hi, coeff_monomial_same]
· simp only [Nat.cast_lt] at hi
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
exact ne_of_lt hi
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is `n` if `a ≠ 0`. -/
theorem order_monomial_of_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) : order (monomial R n a) = n := by
classical
rw [order_monomial, if_neg h]
/-- If `n` is strictly smaller than the order of `ψ`, then the `n`th coefficient of its product
with any other power series is `0`. -/
theorem coeff_mul_of_lt_order {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < ψ.order) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = 0 := by
suffices coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, 0 by rw [this, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [coeff_mul]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
refine mul_eq_zero_of_right (coeff R x.fst φ) (coeff_of_lt_order x.snd (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ h))
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hx
norm_cast
omega
theorem coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order {R : Type*} [Ring R] {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (n : ℕ)
(h : ↑n < ψ.order) : coeff R n (φ * (1 - ψ)) = coeff R n φ := by
simp [coeff_mul_of_lt_order h, mul_sub]
theorem coeff_mul_prod_one_sub_of_lt_order {R ι : Type*} [CommRing R] (k : ℕ) (s : Finset ι)
(φ : R⟦X⟧) (f : ι → R⟦X⟧) :
(∀ i ∈ s, ↑k < (f i).order) → coeff R k (φ * ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - f i)) = coeff R k φ := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s ha ih t
· simp
· intro t
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp] at t
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm, coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order _ t.1]
exact ih t.2
/-- Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divXPowOrder f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order -/
def divXPowOrder (f : R⟦X⟧) : R⟦X⟧ :=
.mk fun n ↦ coeff R (n + f.order.toNat) f
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-15")]
noncomputable alias divided_by_X_pow_order := divXPowOrder
@[simp]
lemma coeff_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} :
coeff R n (divXPowOrder f) = coeff R (n + f.order.toNat) f :=
coeff_mk _ _
@[simp]
lemma divXPowOrder_zero :
divXPowOrder (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
ext
simp
lemma constantCoeff_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} :
constantCoeff R (divXPowOrder f) = coeff R f.order.toNat f := by
simp [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
| lemma constantCoeff_divXPowOrder_eq_zero_iff {f : R⟦X⟧} :
constantCoeff R (divXPowOrder f) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
by_cases h : f = 0
· simp [h]
· simp [constantCoeff_divXPowOrder, coeff_order h, h]
theorem X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} :
X ^ f.order.toNat * divXPowOrder f = f := by
ext n
rw [coeff_X_pow_mul']
split_ifs with h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Order.lean | 263 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry
/-!
# Tensor product of an indexed family of modules over commutative semirings
We define the tensor product of an indexed family `s : ι → Type*` of modules over commutative
semirings. We denote this space by `⨂[R] i, s i` and define it as `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`
quotiented by the appropriate equivalence relation. The treatment follows very closely that of the
binary tensor product in `LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor product
of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `tprod R f` with `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i` over all `i : ι`.
This is bundled as a multilinear map from `Π i, s i` to `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `liftAddHom` constructs an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a
function `φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties.
* `lift φ` with `φ : MultilinearMap R s E` is the corresponding linear map
`(⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E`. This is bundled as a linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.reindex e` re-indexes the components of `⨂[R] i : ι, M` along `e : ι ≃ ι₂`.
* `PiTensorProduct.tmulEquiv` equivalence between a `TensorProduct` of `PiTensorProduct`s and
a single `PiTensorProduct`.
## Notations
* `⨂[R] i, s i` is defined as localized notation in locale `TensorProduct`.
* `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i` with `f : ∀ i, s i` is defined globally as the tensor product of all the `f i`'s.
## Implementation notes
* We define it via `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` with the `R` representing a "hidden" tensor
factor, rather than `FreeAddMonoid (Π i, s i)` to ensure that, if `ι` is an empty type,
the space is isomorphic to the base ring `R`.
* We have not restricted the index type `ι` to be a `Fintype`, as nothing we do here strictly
requires it. However, problems may arise in the case where `ι` is infinite; use at your own
caution.
* Instead of requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `PiTensorProduct` itself, we include it
as an argument in the constructors of the relation. A decidability instance still has to come
from somewhere due to the use of `Function.update`, but this hides it from the downstream user.
See the implementation notes for `MultilinearMap` for an extended discussion of this choice.
## TODO
* Define tensor powers, symmetric subspace, etc.
* API for the various ways `ι` can be split into subsets; connect this with the binary
tensor product.
* Include connection with holors.
* Port more of the API from the binary tensor product over to this case.
## Tags
multilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
open Function
section Semiring
variable {ι ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R₁ R₂ : Type*}
variable {s : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (s i)] [∀ i, Module R (s i)]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommMonoid F]
namespace PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → Prop
| of_zero : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)) 0
| of_zero_scalar : ∀ f : Π i, s i, Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (0, f)) 0
| of_add : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₁) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₂))
(FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
| of_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r', f)) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r + r', f))
| of_smul : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (r' • f i))) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r' * r, f))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor
product of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`. -/
def PiTensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).Quotient
variable {R}
unsuppress_compilation in
/-- This enables the notation `⨂[R] i : ι, s i` for the pi tensor product `PiTensorProduct`,
given an indexed family of types `s : ι → Type*`. -/
scoped[TensorProduct] notation3:100"⨂["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => PiTensorProduct R f) => r
open TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section Module
instance : AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).addMonoid with
add_comm := fun x y ↦
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ ↦
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (⨂[R] i, s i) := ⟨0⟩
variable (R) {s}
/-- `tprodCoeff R r f` with `r : R` and `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i`
over all `i : ι`, multiplied by the coefficient `r`. Note that this is meant as an auxiliary
definition for this file alone, and that one should use `tprod` defined below for most purposes. -/
def tprodCoeff (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) : ⨂[R] i, s i :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)
variable {R}
theorem zero_tprodCoeff (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R 0 f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_scalar _
theorem zero_tprodCoeff' (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (hf : f i = 0) : tprodCoeff R z f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero _ _ i hf
theorem add_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₁) + tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₂) =
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (m₁ + m₂)) :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add _ z f i m₁ m₂)
theorem add_tprodCoeff' (z₁ z₂ : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
tprodCoeff R z₁ f + tprodCoeff R z₂ f = tprodCoeff R (z₁ + z₂) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f)
theorem smul_tprodCoeff_aux [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r * z) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _ _ _
theorem smul_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R₁) [SMul R₁ R]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R R] [SMul R₁ (s i)] [IsScalarTower R₁ R (s i)] :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := by
have h₁ : r • z = r • (1 : R) * z := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
have h₂ : r • f i = (r • (1 : R)) • f i := (smul_one_smul _ _ _).symm
rw [h₁, h₂]
exact smul_tprodCoeff_aux z f i _
/-- Construct an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a function
`φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties. -/
def liftAddHom (φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F)
(C0 : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), φ (r, f) = 0)
(C0' : ∀ f : Π i, s i, φ (0, f) = 0)
(C_add : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
φ (r, update f i m₁) + φ (r, update f i m₂) = φ (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
(C_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i), φ (r, f) + φ (r', f) = φ (r + r', f))
(C_smul : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
φ (r, update f i (r' • f i)) = φ (r' * r, f)) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →+ F :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift φ) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy ↦
match hxy with
| Eqv.of_zero r' f i hf =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0 r' f i hf]
| Eqv.of_zero_scalar f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0']
| Eqv.of_add inst z f i m₁ m₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_add inst]
| Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C_add_scalar]
| Eqv.of_smul inst z f i r' =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_smul inst]
| Eqv.add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, add_comm]
/-- Induct using `tprodCoeff` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(tprodCoeff : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (tprodCoeff R r f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
have C0 : motive 0 := by
have h₁ := tprodCoeff 0 0
rwa [zero_tprodCoeff] at h₁
refine AddCon.induction_on z fun x ↦ FreeAddMonoid.recOn x C0 ?_
simp_rw [AddCon.coe_add]
refine fun f y ih ↦ add _ _ ?_ ih
convert tprodCoeff f.1 f.2
| section DistribMulAction
variable [Monoid R₁] [DistribMulAction R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R]
variable [Monoid R₂] [DistribMulAction R₂ R] [SMulCommClass R₂ R R]
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance hasSMul' : SMul R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun r ↦
liftAddHom (fun f : R × Π i, s i ↦ tprodCoeff R (r • f.1) f.2)
(fun r' f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [zero_tprodCoeff' _ f i hf])
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/PiTensorProduct.lean | 203 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# The Pochhammer polynomials
We define and prove some basic relations about
`ascPochhammer S n : S[X] := X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`
which is also known as the rising factorial and about
`descPochhammer R n : R[X] := X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`
which is also known as the falling factorial. Versions of this definition
that are focused on `Nat` can be found in `Data.Nat.Factorial` as `Nat.ascFactorial` and
`Nat.descFactorial`.
## Implementation
As with many other families of polynomials, even though the coefficients are always in `ℕ` or `ℤ` ,
we define the polynomial with coefficients in any `[Semiring S]` or `[Ring R]`.
In an integral domain `S`, we show that `ascPochhammer S n` is zero iff
`n` is a sufficiently large non-positive integer.
## TODO
There is lots more in this direction:
* q-factorials, q-binomials, q-Pochhammer.
-/
universe u v
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
/-- `ascPochhammer S n` is the polynomial `X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`,
with coefficients in the semiring `S`.
-/
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
rw [ascPochhammer]
theorem monic_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial S] [NoZeroDivisors S] :
Monic <| ascPochhammer S n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : leadingCoeff (X + 1 : S[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_add_C 1
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul,
leadingCoeff_comp (ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_add_C 1 : natDegree (X + 1) ≠ 0), hn,
monic_X, one_mul, one_mul, this, one_pow]
section
variable {S} {T : Type v} [Semiring T]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_map (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).map f = ascPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, ascPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval₂ (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) (t : T) :
(ascPochhammer T n).eval t = (ascPochhammer S n).eval₂ f t := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map f]
exact eval_map f t
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) [Algebra R S]
(x : S) : ((ascPochhammer S n).comp (p.map (algebraMap R S))).eval x =
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_eval₂ (algebraMap R S), ← eval₂_comp', ← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap R S),
← map_comp, eval_map]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_cast (n k : ℕ) :
(((ascPochhammer ℕ n).eval k : ℕ) : S) = ((ascPochhammer S n).eval k : S) := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℕ S), eval_map, ← eq_natCast (algebraMap ℕ S),
eval₂_at_natCast,Nat.cast_id]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, ascPochhammer_succ_left]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero_eval_zero : (ascPochhammer S 0).eval 0 = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = 0 := by
simp [ascPochhammer_eval_zero, h]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_right (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = ascPochhammer S n * (X + (n : S[X])) := by
suffices h : ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) = ascPochhammer ℕ n * (X + (n : ℕ[X])) by
apply_fun Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℕ S) at h
simpa only [ascPochhammer_map, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_natCast] using h
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs =>
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, ih, mul_comp, ← mul_assoc, ← ascPochhammer_succ_left, add_comp,
X_comp, natCast_comp, add_assoc, add_comm (1 : ℕ[X]), ← Nat.cast_succ]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_eval {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (k : S) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).eval k = (ascPochhammer S n).eval k * (k + n) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, ← C_eq_natCast,
eval_C_mul, Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_comp_X_add_one (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) + (n + 1) • (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
suffices (ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) + (n + 1) * (ascPochhammer ℕ n).comp (X + 1)
by simpa [map_comp] using congr_arg (Polynomial.map (Nat.castRingHom S)) this
nth_rw 2 [ascPochhammer_succ_left]
rw [← add_mul, ascPochhammer_succ_right ℕ n, mul_comp, mul_comm, add_comp, X_comp, natCast_comp,
add_comm, ← add_assoc]
ring
theorem ascPochhammer_mul (n m : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S n * (ascPochhammer S m).comp (X + (n : S[X])) = ascPochhammer S (n + m) := by
induction' m with m ih
· simp
· rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, Polynomial.mul_X_add_natCast_comp, ← mul_assoc, ih,
← add_assoc, ascPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.cast_add, add_assoc]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (ascPochhammer ℕ k).eval n = n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one, Nat.ascFactorial_zero]
| t + 1 => by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, eval_mul, ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial n t, eval_add, eval_X,
eval_natCast, Nat.cast_id, Nat.ascFactorial_succ, mul_comm]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_ascFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (n k : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S k).eval (n : S) = n.ascFactorial k := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer ℕ b).eval a = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial']
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_descFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S b).eval (a : S) = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors S] [Nontrivial S] :
(ascPochhammer S n).natDegree = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : natDegree (X + (n : S[X])) = 1 := natDegree_X_add_C (n : S)
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right,
natDegree_mul _ (ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| this.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_one), hn, this]
cases n
· simp
· refine ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| hn.symm ▸ Nat.add_one_pos _
end Semiring
section StrictOrderedSemiring
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [PartialOrder S] [IsStrictOrderedRing S]
theorem ascPochhammer_pos (n : ℕ) (s : S) (h : 0 < s) : 0 < (ascPochhammer S n).eval s := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one]
exact zero_lt_one
| succ n ih =>
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, ← Nat.cast_comm, eval_natCast_mul, eval_mul_X,
Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add]
exact mul_pos ih (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_of_nonneg_right (Nat.cast_nonneg n)))
end StrictOrderedSemiring
section Factorial
open Nat
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (r n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_one (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (1 : S) = (n ! : S) := by
rw_mod_cast [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.one_ascFactorial]
theorem factorial_mul_ascPochhammer (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (r n : ℕ) :
(r ! : S) * (ascPochhammer S n).eval (r + 1 : S) = (r + n)! := by
rw_mod_cast [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eval_succ (r : ℕ) :
∀ n : ℕ, n * (ascPochhammer ℕ r).eval (n + 1) = (n + r) * (ascPochhammer ℕ r).eval n
| 0 => by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, zero_add]
· simp only [ascPochhammer_eval_zero, zero_mul, if_neg h, mul_zero]
| k + 1 => by simp only [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.succ_ascFactorial, add_right_comm]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_succ (r n : ℕ) :
(n : S) * (ascPochhammer S r).eval (n + 1 : S) =
(n + r) * (ascPochhammer S r).eval (n : S) :=
mod_cast congr_arg Nat.cast (ascPochhammer_nat_eval_succ r n)
end Factorial
section Ring
variable (R : Type u) [Ring R]
/-- `descPochhammer R n` is the polynomial `X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`,
with coefficients in the ring `R`.
-/
noncomputable def descPochhammer : ℕ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (descPochhammer n).comp (X - 1)
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_zero : descPochhammer R 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_one : descPochhammer R 1 = X := by simp [descPochhammer]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R (n + 1) = X * (descPochhammer R n).comp (X - 1) := by
rw [descPochhammer]
theorem monic_descPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
Monic <| descPochhammer R n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have h : leadingCoeff (X - 1 : R[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_sub_C 1
have : natDegree (X - (1 : R[X])) ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_sub_C (1 : R)
rw [descPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_comp this, hn, monic_X,
one_mul, one_mul, h, one_pow]
section
variable {R} {T : Type v} [Ring T]
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_map (f : R →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R n).map f = descPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, descPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_cast (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) :
(((descPochhammer ℤ n).eval k : ℤ) : R) = ((descPochhammer R n).eval k : R) := by
rw [← descPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℤ R), eval_map, ← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ R)]
simp only [algebraMap_int_eq, eq_intCast, eval₂_at_intCast, Nat.cast_id, eq_natCast, Int.cast_id]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} :
(descPochhammer R n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, descPochhammer_succ_left]
theorem descPochhammer_zero_eval_zero : (descPochhammer R 0).eval 0 = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (descPochhammer R n).eval 0 = 0 := by
simp [descPochhammer_eval_zero, h]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_right (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R (n + 1) = descPochhammer R n * (X - (n : R[X])) := by
suffices h : descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1) = descPochhammer ℤ n * (X - (n : ℤ[X])) by
apply_fun Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℤ R) at h
simpa [descPochhammer_map, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_intCast] using h
induction n with
| zero => simp [descPochhammer]
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs =>
rw [descPochhammer_succ_left, ih, mul_comp, ← mul_assoc, ← descPochhammer_succ_left, sub_comp,
X_comp, natCast_comp]
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap]
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
(descPochhammer R n).natDegree = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : natDegree (X - (n : R[X])) = 1 := natDegree_X_sub_C (n : R)
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right,
natDegree_mul _ (ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| this.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_one), hn, this]
cases n
· simp
· refine ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| hn.symm ▸ Nat.add_one_pos _
theorem descPochhammer_succ_eval {S : Type*} [Ring S] (n : ℕ) (k : S) :
(descPochhammer S (n + 1)).eval k = (descPochhammer S n).eval k * (k - n) := by
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right, mul_sub, eval_sub, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, ← C_eq_natCast,
eval_C_mul, Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_sub]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_comp_X_sub_one (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R (n + 1)).comp (X - 1) =
descPochhammer R (n + 1) - (n + (1 : R[X])) • (descPochhammer R n).comp (X - 1) := by
suffices (descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1)).comp (X - 1) =
| descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1) - (n + 1) * (descPochhammer ℤ n).comp (X - 1)
by simpa [map_comp] using congr_arg (Polynomial.map (Int.castRingHom R)) this
nth_rw 2 [descPochhammer_succ_left]
rw [← sub_mul, descPochhammer_succ_right ℤ n, mul_comp, mul_comm, sub_comp, X_comp, natCast_comp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 326 | 329 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.LinearOrder
import Mathlib.Order.Notation
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.Inhabit
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
/-!
# Basic definitions about `≤` and `<`
This file proves basic results about orders, provides extensive dot notation, defines useful order
classes and allows to transfer order instances.
## Type synonyms
* `OrderDual α` : A type synonym reversing the meaning of all inequalities, with notation `αᵒᵈ`.
* `AsLinearOrder α`: A type synonym to promote `PartialOrder α` to `LinearOrder α` using
`IsTotal α (≤)`.
### Transferring orders
- `Order.Preimage`, `Preorder.lift`: Transfers a (pre)order on `β` to an order on `α`
using a function `f : α → β`.
- `PartialOrder.lift`, `LinearOrder.lift`: Transfers a partial (resp., linear) order on `β` to a
partial (resp., linear) order on `α` using an injective function `f`.
### Extra class
* `DenselyOrdered`: An order with no gap, i.e. for any two elements `a < b` there exists `c` such
that `a < c < b`.
## Notes
`≤` and `<` are highly favored over `≥` and `>` in mathlib. The reason is that we can formulate all
lemmas using `≤`/`<`, and `rw` has trouble unifying `≤` and `≥`. Hence choosing one direction spares
us useless duplication. This is enforced by a linter. See Note [nolint_ge] for more infos.
Dot notation is particularly useful on `≤` (`LE.le`) and `<` (`LT.lt`). To that end, we
provide many aliases to dot notation-less lemmas. For example, `le_trans` is aliased with
`LE.le.trans` and can be used to construct `hab.trans hbc : a ≤ c` when `hab : a ≤ b`,
`hbc : b ≤ c`, `lt_of_le_of_lt` is aliased as `LE.le.trans_lt` and can be used to construct
`hab.trans hbc : a < c` when `hab : a ≤ b`, `hbc : b < c`.
## TODO
- expand module docs
- automatic construction of dual definitions / theorems
## Tags
preorder, order, partial order, poset, linear order, chain
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-! ### Bare relations -/
attribute [ext] LE
protected lemma LE.le.ge [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≤ y) : y ≥ x := h
protected lemma GE.ge.le [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≥ y) : y ≤ x := h
protected lemma LT.lt.gt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x < y) : y > x := h
protected lemma GT.gt.lt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x > y) : y < x := h
/-- Given a relation `R` on `β` and a function `f : α → β`, the preimage relation on `α` is defined
by `x ≤ y ↔ f x ≤ f y`. It is the unique relation on `α` making `f` a `RelEmbedding` (assuming `f`
is injective). -/
@[simp]
def Order.Preimage (f : α → β) (s : β → β → Prop) (x y : α) : Prop := s (f x) (f y)
@[inherit_doc] infixl:80 " ⁻¹'o " => Order.Preimage
/-- The preimage of a decidable order is decidable. -/
instance Order.Preimage.decidable (f : α → β) (s : β → β → Prop) [H : DecidableRel s] :
DecidableRel (f ⁻¹'o s) := fun _ _ ↦ H _ _
/-! ### Preorders -/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem le_trans' : b ≤ c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_trans
theorem lt_trans' : b < c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_trans
theorem lt_of_le_of_lt' : b ≤ c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem lt_of_lt_of_le' : b < c → a ≤ b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem le_of_le_of_eq' : b ≤ c → a = b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_eq_of_le
theorem le_of_eq_of_le' : b = c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_le_of_eq
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq' : b < c → a = b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_eq_of_lt
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt' : b = c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_eq
theorem not_lt_iff_not_le_or_ge : ¬a < b ↔ ¬a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, Classical.not_and_iff_not_or_not, Classical.not_not]
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma not_lt_iff_le_imp_le : ¬ a < b ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) := by
simp [not_lt_iff_not_le_or_ge, or_iff_not_imp_left]
/-- If `x = y` then `y ≤ x`. Note: this lemma uses `y ≤ x` instead of `x ≥ y`, because `le` is used
almost exclusively in mathlib. -/
lemma ge_of_eq (h : a = b) : b ≤ a := le_of_eq h.symm
@[simp] lemma lt_self_iff_false (x : α) : x < x ↔ False := ⟨lt_irrefl x, False.elim⟩
alias LE.le.trans := le_trans
alias LE.le.trans' := le_trans'
alias LT.lt.trans := lt_trans
alias LT.lt.trans' := lt_trans'
alias LE.le.trans_lt := lt_of_le_of_lt
alias LE.le.trans_lt' := lt_of_le_of_lt'
alias LT.lt.trans_le := lt_of_lt_of_le
alias LT.lt.trans_le' := lt_of_lt_of_le'
alias LE.le.trans_eq := le_of_le_of_eq
alias LE.le.trans_eq' := le_of_le_of_eq'
alias LT.lt.trans_eq := lt_of_lt_of_eq
alias LT.lt.trans_eq' := lt_of_lt_of_eq'
alias Eq.trans_le := le_of_eq_of_le
alias Eq.trans_ge := le_of_eq_of_le'
alias Eq.trans_lt := lt_of_eq_of_lt
alias Eq.trans_gt := lt_of_eq_of_lt'
alias LE.le.lt_of_not_le := lt_of_le_not_le
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq_dec := Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le
alias LT.lt.le := le_of_lt
alias LT.lt.ne := ne_of_lt
alias Eq.le := le_of_eq
@[inherit_doc ge_of_eq] alias Eq.ge := ge_of_eq
alias LT.lt.asymm := lt_asymm
alias LT.lt.not_lt := lt_asymm
theorem ne_of_not_le (h : ¬a ≤ b) : a ≠ b := fun hab ↦ h (le_of_eq hab)
protected lemma Eq.not_lt (hab : a = b) : ¬a < b := fun h' ↦ h'.ne hab
protected lemma Eq.not_gt (hab : a = b) : ¬b < a := hab.symm.not_lt
@[simp] lemma le_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : a ≤ b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).le
-- Making this a @[simp] lemma causes confluence problems downstream.
lemma not_lt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : ¬a < b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).not_lt
namespace LT.lt
protected theorem false : a < a → False := lt_irrefl a
theorem ne' (h : a < b) : b ≠ a := h.ne.symm
end LT.lt
theorem le_of_forall_le (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a → c ≤ b) : a ≤ b := H _ le_rfl
theorem le_of_forall_ge (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c → b ≤ c) : b ≤ a := H _ le_rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias le_of_forall_le' := le_of_forall_ge
theorem forall_le_iff_le : (∀ ⦃c⦄, c ≤ a → c ≤ b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_forall_le, fun h _ hca ↦ le_trans hca h⟩
theorem forall_le_iff_ge : (∀ ⦃c⦄, a ≤ c → b ≤ c) ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_forall_ge, fun h _ hca ↦ le_trans h hca⟩
/-- monotonicity of `≤` with respect to `→` -/
theorem le_implies_le_of_le_of_le (hca : c ≤ a) (hbd : b ≤ d) : a ≤ b → c ≤ d :=
fun hab ↦ (hca.trans hab).trans hbd
end Preorder
/-! ### Partial order -/
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem ge_antisymm : a ≤ b → b ≤ a → b = a :=
flip le_antisymm
theorem lt_of_le_of_ne' : a ≤ b → b ≠ a → a < b := fun h₁ h₂ ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ h₂.symm
theorem Ne.lt_of_le : a ≠ b → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne
theorem Ne.lt_of_le' : b ≠ a → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne'
alias LE.le.antisymm := le_antisymm
alias LE.le.antisymm' := ge_antisymm
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne := lt_of_le_of_ne
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne' := lt_of_le_of_ne'
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq := lt_or_eq_of_le
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma le_imp_eq_iff_le_imp_le : (a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) where
mp h hab := (h hab).le
mpr h hab := (h hab).antisymm hab
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma ge_imp_eq_iff_le_imp_le : (a ≤ b → a = b) ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) where
mp h hab := (h hab).ge
mpr h hab := hab.antisymm (h hab)
namespace LE.le
theorem lt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne, h.lt_of_ne⟩
theorem gt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ b ≠ a :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne.symm, h.lt_of_ne'⟩
theorem not_lt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ a = b :=
h.lt_iff_ne.not_left
theorem not_gt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ b = a :=
h.gt_iff_ne.not_left
theorem le_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.antisymm h, Eq.le⟩
theorem ge_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ a = b :=
⟨h.antisymm, Eq.ge⟩
end LE.le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt [DecidableLE α] : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
Decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
theorem le_iff_eq_or_lt : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b := le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne : a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨le_of_lt h, ne_of_lt h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ h1.lt_of_ne h2⟩
lemma eq_iff_not_lt_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) : a = b ↔ ¬ a < b := by simp [hab, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
alias LE.le.eq_iff_not_lt := eq_iff_not_lt_of_le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt [DecidableLE α] : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, h ▸ lt_irrefl _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦
h₁.antisymm <| Decidable.byContradiction fun h₃ ↦ h₂ (h₁.lt_of_not_le h₃)⟩
theorem eq_iff_le_not_lt : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt
theorem eq_or_lt_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a = b ∨ a < b := h.lt_or_eq.symm
theorem eq_or_gt_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : b = a ∨ a < b := h.lt_or_eq.symm.imp Eq.symm id
theorem gt_or_eq_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ∨ b = a := (eq_or_gt_of_le h).symm
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt_dec := Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt := eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_gt := eq_or_gt_of_le
alias LE.le.gt_or_eq := gt_or_eq_of_le
theorem eq_of_le_of_not_lt (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : a = b := hab.eq_or_lt.resolve_right hba
theorem eq_of_ge_of_not_gt (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : b = a := (eq_of_le_of_not_lt hab hba).symm
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_lt := eq_of_le_of_not_lt
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_gt := eq_of_ge_of_not_gt
theorem Ne.le_iff_lt (h : a ≠ b) : a ≤ b ↔ a < b := ⟨fun h' ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h' h, fun h ↦ h.le⟩
theorem Ne.not_le_or_not_le (h : a ≠ b) : ¬a ≤ b ∨ ¬b ≤ a := not_and_or.1 <| le_antisymm_iff.not.1 h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le [DecidableEq α] : (a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ Decidable.byCases le_of_eq (le_of_lt ∘ h.mp), fun h ↦ ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne h, ne_of_lt⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ne_iff_lt_iff_le : (a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le
lemma eq_of_forall_le_iff (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a ↔ c ≤ b) : a = b :=
((H _).1 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).2 le_rfl)
lemma eq_of_forall_ge_iff (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c ↔ b ≤ c) : a = b :=
((H _).2 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).1 le_rfl)
/-- To prove commutativity of a binary operation `○`, we only to check `a ○ b ≤ b ○ a` for all `a`,
`b`. -/
lemma commutative_of_le {f : β → β → α} (comm : ∀ a b, f a b ≤ f b a) : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a :=
fun _ _ ↦ (comm _ _).antisymm <| comm _ _
/-- To prove associativity of a commutative binary operation `○`, we only to check
`(a ○ b) ○ c ≤ a ○ (b ○ c)` for all `a`, `b`, `c`. -/
lemma associative_of_commutative_of_le {f : α → α → α} (comm : Std.Commutative f)
(assoc : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c ≤ f a (f b c)) : Std.Associative f where
assoc a b c :=
le_antisymm (assoc _ _ _) <| by
rw [comm.comm, comm.comm b, comm.comm _ c, comm.comm a]
exact assoc ..
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b : α}
namespace LE.le
lemma lt_or_le (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a < c ∨ c ≤ b := (lt_or_ge a c).imp id h.trans'
lemma le_or_lt (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c < b := (le_or_gt a c).imp id h.trans_lt'
lemma le_or_le (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b := (h.lt_or_le c).imp le_of_lt id
end LE.le
namespace LT.lt
lemma lt_or_lt (h : a < b) (c : α) : a < c ∨ c < b := (le_or_gt b c).imp h.trans_le id
end LT.lt
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
theorem min_def' (a b : α) : min a b = if b ≤ a then b else a := by
rw [min_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
-- This is sometimes useful as it used to be the default.
theorem max_def' (a b : α) : max a b = if b ≤ a then a else b := by
rw [max_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
theorem lt_of_not_le (h : ¬b ≤ a) : a < b :=
((le_total _ _).resolve_right h).lt_of_not_le h
theorem lt_iff_not_le : a < b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨not_le_of_lt, lt_of_not_le⟩
theorem Ne.lt_or_lt (h : a ≠ b) : a < b ∨ b < a :=
lt_or_gt_of_ne h
/-- A version of `ne_iff_lt_or_gt` with LHS and RHS reversed. -/
@[simp]
theorem lt_or_lt_iff_ne : a < b ∨ b < a ↔ a ≠ b :=
ne_iff_lt_or_gt.symm
theorem not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt : ¬a < b ↔ a = b ∨ b < a :=
not_lt.trans <| Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt.trans <| or_congr eq_comm Iff.rfl
theorem exists_ge_of_linear (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
match le_total a b with
| Or.inl h => ⟨_, h, le_rfl⟩
| Or.inr h => ⟨_, le_rfl, h⟩
lemma exists_forall_ge_and {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j) → (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, q j) → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j ∧ q j
| ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := exists_ge_of_linear a b
⟨c, fun _d hcd ↦ ⟨ha _ <| hac.trans hcd, hb _ <| hbc.trans hcd⟩⟩
theorem le_of_forall_lt (H : ∀ c, c < a → c < b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
theorem forall_lt_iff_le : (∀ ⦃c⦄, c < a → c < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt, fun h _ hca ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hca h⟩
theorem le_of_forall_lt' (H : ∀ c, a < c → b < c) : b ≤ a :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
theorem forall_lt_iff_le' : (∀ ⦃c⦄, a < c → b < c) ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt', fun h _ hac ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt h hac⟩
theorem eq_of_forall_lt_iff (h : ∀ c, c < a ↔ c < b) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).1).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).2
theorem eq_of_forall_gt_iff (h : ∀ c, a < c ↔ b < c) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).2).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).1
section ltByCases
variable {P : Sort*} {x y : α}
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_lt (h : x < y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₁ h := dif_pos h
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_gt (h : y < x) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₃ h := (dif_neg h.not_lt).trans (dif_pos h)
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_eq (h : x = y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₂ h := (dif_neg h.not_lt).trans (dif_neg h.not_gt)
lemma ltByCases_not_lt (h : ¬ x < y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ y < x → x = y := fun h' => (le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt h') (le_of_not_gt h))) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : y < x then h₃ h' else h₂ (p h') := dif_neg h
lemma ltByCases_not_gt (h : ¬ y < x) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ x < y → x = y := fun h' => (le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt h) (le_of_not_gt h'))) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : x < y then h₁ h' else h₂ (p h') :=
dite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => dif_neg h)
lemma ltByCases_ne (h : x ≠ y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ x < y → y < x := fun h' => h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h') :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : x < y then h₁ h' else h₃ (p h') :=
dite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => dif_pos _)
lemma ltByCases_comm {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : y = x → x = y := fun h' => h'.symm) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = ltByCases y x h₃ (h₂ ∘ p) h₁ := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· rw [ltByCases_lt h, ltByCases_gt h]
· rw [ltByCases_eq h, ltByCases_eq h.symm, comp_apply]
· rw [ltByCases_lt h, ltByCases_gt h]
lemma eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt {x' y' : α}
(ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y')) (gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) :
x = y ↔ x' = y' := by simp_rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ← not_lt, ltc, gtc]
lemma ltByCases_rec {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} (p : P)
(hlt : (h : x < y) → h₁ h = p) (heq : (h : x = y) → h₂ h = p)
(hgt : (h : y < x) → h₃ h = p) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = p :=
ltByCases x y
(fun h => ltByCases_lt h ▸ hlt h)
(fun h => ltByCases_eq h ▸ heq h)
(fun h => ltByCases_gt h ▸ hgt h)
lemma ltByCases_eq_iff {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} {p : P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = p ↔ (∃ h, h₁ h = p) ∨ (∃ h, h₂ h = p) ∨ (∃ h, h₃ h = p) := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· simp only [ltByCases_lt, exists_prop_of_true, h, h.not_lt, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, or_false, h.ne]
· simp only [h, lt_self_iff_false, ltByCases_eq, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, exists_prop_of_true, or_false, false_or]
· simp only [ltByCases_gt, exists_prop_of_true, h, h.not_lt, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, false_or, h.ne']
lemma ltByCases_congr {x' y' : α} {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
{h₁' : x' < y' → P} {h₂' : x' = y' → P} {h₃' : y' < x' → P} (ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y'))
(gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) (hh'₁ : ∀ (h : x' < y'), h₁ (ltc.mpr h) = h₁' h)
(hh'₂ : ∀ (h : x' = y'), h₂ ((eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt ltc gtc).mpr h) = h₂' h)
(hh'₃ : ∀ (h : y' < x'), h₃ (gtc.mpr h) = h₃' h) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = ltByCases x' y' h₁' h₂' h₃' := by
refine ltByCases_rec _ (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· rw [ltByCases_lt (ltc.mp h), hh'₁]
· rw [eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt ltc gtc] at h
rw [ltByCases_eq h, hh'₂]
· rw [ltByCases_gt (gtc.mp h), hh'₃]
/-- Perform a case-split on the ordering of `x` and `y` in a decidable linear order,
non-dependently. -/
abbrev ltTrichotomy (x y : α) (p q r : P) := ltByCases x y (fun _ => p) (fun _ => q) (fun _ => r)
variable {p q r s : P}
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_lt (h : x < y) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = p := ltByCases_lt h
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_gt (h : y < x) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = r := ltByCases_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_eq (h : x = y) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = q := ltByCases_eq h
lemma ltTrichotomy_not_lt (h : ¬ x < y) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if y < x then r else q := ltByCases_not_lt h
lemma ltTrichotomy_not_gt (h : ¬ y < x) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if x < y then p else q := ltByCases_not_gt h
lemma ltTrichotomy_ne (h : x ≠ y) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if x < y then p else r := ltByCases_ne h
lemma ltTrichotomy_comm : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = ltTrichotomy y x r q p := ltByCases_comm
lemma ltTrichotomy_self {p : P} : ltTrichotomy x y p p p = p :=
ltByCases_rec p (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
lemma ltTrichotomy_eq_iff : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = s ↔
(x < y ∧ p = s) ∨ (x = y ∧ q = s) ∨ (y < x ∧ r = s) := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_lt, false_and, true_and, or_false, h, h.not_lt, h.ne]
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_eq, false_and, true_and, or_false, false_or, h, lt_irrefl]
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_gt, false_and, true_and, false_or, h, h.not_lt, h.ne']
lemma ltTrichotomy_congr {x' y' : α} {p' q' r' : P} (ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y'))
(gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) (hh'₁ : x' < y' → p = p')
(hh'₂ : x' = y' → q = q') (hh'₃ : y' < x' → r = r') :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = ltTrichotomy x' y' p' q' r' :=
ltByCases_congr ltc gtc hh'₁ hh'₂ hh'₃
end ltByCases
/-! #### `min`/`max` recursors -/
section MinMaxRec
variable {p : α → Prop}
lemma min_rec (ha : a ≤ b → p a) (hb : b ≤ a → p b) : p (min a b) := by
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b <;> simp [min_eq_left, min_eq_right, *]
lemma max_rec (ha : b ≤ a → p a) (hb : a ≤ b → p b) : p (max a b) := by
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b <;> simp [max_eq_left, max_eq_right, *]
lemma min_rec' (p : α → Prop) (ha : p a) (hb : p b) : p (min a b) :=
min_rec (fun _ ↦ ha) fun _ ↦ hb
lemma max_rec' (p : α → Prop) (ha : p a) (hb : p b) : p (max a b) :=
max_rec (fun _ ↦ ha) fun _ ↦ hb
lemma min_def_lt (a b : α) : min a b = if a < b then a else b := by
rw [min_comm, min_def, ← ite_not]; simp only [not_le]
lemma max_def_lt (a b : α) : max a b = if a < b then b else a := by
rw [max_comm, max_def, ← ite_not]; simp only [not_le]
end MinMaxRec
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Implications -/
lemma lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b → c ≤ d) (h : d < c) : b < a :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' ↦ (H h').not_lt h
lemma le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
a ≤ b → c ≤ d ↔ d < c → b < a :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le, le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' {β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) (H' : b ≤ a ↔ d ≤ c) : b < a ↔ d < c :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| (and_congr H' (not_congr H)).trans lt_iff_le_not_le.symm
lemma lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) : b < a ↔ d < c := not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_le
lemma le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
(a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) ↔ (b < a ↔ d < c) :=
⟨lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le, fun H ↦ not_lt.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_lt⟩
/-- A symmetric relation implies two values are equal, when it implies they're less-equal. -/
lemma rel_imp_eq_of_rel_imp_le [PartialOrder β] (r : α → α → Prop) [IsSymm α r] {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → f a ≤ f b) {a b : α} : r a b → f a = f b := fun hab ↦
le_antisymm (h a b hab) (h b a <| symm hab)
/-! ### Extensionality lemmas -/
@[ext]
lemma Preorder.toLE_injective : Function.Injective (@Preorder.toLE α) :=
fun
| { lt := A_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := A_iff, .. },
{ lt := B_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := B_iff, .. } => by
rintro ⟨⟩
have : A_lt = B_lt := by
funext a b
rw [A_iff, B_iff]
cases this
congr
@[ext]
lemma PartialOrder.toPreorder_injective : Function.Injective (@PartialOrder.toPreorder α) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; congr
@[ext]
lemma LinearOrder.toPartialOrder_injective : Function.Injective (@LinearOrder.toPartialOrder α) :=
fun
| { le := A_le, lt := A_lt,
toDecidableLE := A_decidableLE, toDecidableEq := A_decidableEq, toDecidableLT := A_decidableLT
min := A_min, max := A_max, min_def := A_min_def, max_def := A_max_def,
compare := A_compare, compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := A_compare_canonical, .. },
{ le := B_le, lt := B_lt,
toDecidableLE := B_decidableLE, toDecidableEq := B_decidableEq, toDecidableLT := B_decidableLT
min := B_min, max := B_max, min_def := B_min_def, max_def := B_max_def,
compare := B_compare, compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := B_compare_canonical, .. } => by
rintro ⟨⟩
obtain rfl : A_decidableLE = B_decidableLE := Subsingleton.elim _ _
obtain rfl : A_decidableEq = B_decidableEq := Subsingleton.elim _ _
obtain rfl : A_decidableLT = B_decidableLT := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have : A_min = B_min := by
funext a b
exact (A_min_def _ _).trans (B_min_def _ _).symm
cases this
have : A_max = B_max := by
funext a b
exact (A_max_def _ _).trans (B_max_def _ _).symm
cases this
have : A_compare = B_compare := by
funext a b
exact (A_compare_canonical _ _).trans (B_compare_canonical _ _).symm
congr
lemma Preorder.ext {A B : Preorder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B := by
ext x y; exact H x y
lemma PartialOrder.ext {A B : PartialOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by ext x y; exact H x y
lemma PartialOrder.ext_lt {A B : PartialOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x < y) ↔ x < y) :
A = B := by ext x y; rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, @le_iff_lt_or_eq _ A, H]
lemma LinearOrder.ext {A B : LinearOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by ext x y; exact H x y
lemma LinearOrder.ext_lt {A B : LinearOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x < y) ↔ x < y) :
A = B := LinearOrder.toPartialOrder_injective (PartialOrder.ext_lt H)
/-! ### Order dual -/
/-- Type synonym to equip a type with the dual order: `≤` means `≥` and `<` means `>`. `αᵒᵈ` is
notation for `OrderDual α`. -/
def OrderDual (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
α
@[inherit_doc]
notation:max α "ᵒᵈ" => OrderDual α
namespace OrderDual
instance (α : Type*) [h : Nonempty α] : Nonempty αᵒᵈ :=
h
instance (α : Type*) [h : Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton αᵒᵈ :=
h
instance (α : Type*) [LE α] : LE αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun x y : α ↦ y ≤ x⟩
instance (α : Type*) [LT α] : LT αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun x y : α ↦ y < x⟩
instance instOrd (α : Type*) [Ord α] : Ord αᵒᵈ where
compare := fun (a b : α) ↦ compare b a
instance instSup (α : Type*) [Min α] : Max αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊓ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance instInf (α : Type*) [Max α] : Min αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊔ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance instPreorder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Preorder αᵒᵈ where
le_refl := fun _ ↦ le_refl _
le_trans := fun _ _ _ hab hbc ↦ hbc.trans hab
lt_iff_le_not_le := fun _ _ ↦ lt_iff_le_not_le
instance instPartialOrder (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] : PartialOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Preorder αᵒᵈ)
le_antisymm := fun a b hab hba ↦ @le_antisymm α _ a b hba hab
instance instLinearOrder (α : Type*) [LinearOrder α] : LinearOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder αᵒᵈ)
__ := inferInstanceAs (Ord αᵒᵈ)
le_total := fun a b : α ↦ le_total b a
max := fun a b ↦ (min a b : α)
min := fun a b ↦ (max a b : α)
min_def := fun a b ↦ show (max .. : α) = _ by rw [max_comm, max_def]; rfl
max_def := fun a b ↦ show (min .. : α) = _ by rw [min_comm, min_def]; rfl
toDecidableLE := (inferInstance : DecidableRel (fun a b : α ↦ b ≤ a))
toDecidableLT := (inferInstance : DecidableRel (fun a b : α ↦ b < a))
toDecidableEq := (inferInstance : DecidableEq α)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b := by
simp only [compare, LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq, compareOfLessAndEq, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The opposite linear order to a given linear order -/
def _root_.LinearOrder.swap (α : Type*) (_ : LinearOrder α) : LinearOrder α :=
inferInstanceAs <| LinearOrder (OrderDual α)
instance : ∀ [Inhabited α], Inhabited αᵒᵈ := fun [x : Inhabited α] => x
theorem Ord.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : Ord α] : OrderDual.instOrd αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem Preorder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : Preorder α] : OrderDual.instPreorder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem instPartialOrder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : PartialOrder α] :
OrderDual.instPartialOrder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem instLinearOrder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : LinearOrder α] :
OrderDual.instLinearOrder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
end OrderDual
/-! ### `HasCompl` -/
instance Prop.hasCompl : HasCompl Prop :=
⟨Not⟩
instance Pi.hasCompl [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] : HasCompl (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun x i ↦ (x i)ᶜ⟩
theorem Pi.compl_def [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] (x : ∀ i, π i) :
xᶜ = fun i ↦ (x i)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Pi.compl_apply [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] (x : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
xᶜ i = (x i)ᶜ :=
rfl
instance IsIrrefl.compl (r) [IsIrrefl α r] : IsRefl α rᶜ :=
⟨@irrefl α r _⟩
instance IsRefl.compl (r) [IsRefl α r] : IsIrrefl α rᶜ :=
⟨fun a ↦ not_not_intro (refl a)⟩
theorem compl_lt [LinearOrder α] : (· < · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· ≥ ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_le [LinearOrder α] : (· ≤ · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· > ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_gt [LinearOrder α] : (· > · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· ≤ ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_ge [LinearOrder α] : (· ≥ · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· < ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
instance Ne.instIsEquiv_compl : IsEquiv α (· ≠ ·)ᶜ := by
convert eq_isEquiv α
simp [compl]
/-! ### Order instances on the function space -/
instance Pi.hasLe [∀ i, LE (π i)] :
LE (∀ i, π i) where le x y := ∀ i, x i ≤ y i
theorem Pi.le_def [∀ i, LE (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} :
x ≤ y ↔ ∀ i, x i ≤ y i :=
Iff.rfl
instance Pi.preorder [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] : Preorder (∀ i, π i) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (LE (∀ i, π i))
le_refl := fun a i ↦ le_refl (a i)
le_trans := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ i ↦ le_trans (h₁ i) (h₂ i)
theorem Pi.lt_def [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} :
x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ ∃ i, x i < y i := by
simp +contextual [lt_iff_le_not_le, Pi.le_def]
instance Pi.partialOrder [∀ i, PartialOrder (π i)] : PartialOrder (∀ i, π i) where
__ := Pi.preorder
le_antisymm := fun _ _ h1 h2 ↦ funext fun b ↦ (h1 b).antisymm (h2 b)
namespace Sum
variable {α₁ α₂ : Type*} [LE β]
@[simp]
lemma elim_le_elim_iff {u₁ v₁ : α₁ → β} {u₂ v₂ : α₂ → β} :
Sum.elim u₁ u₂ ≤ Sum.elim v₁ v₂ ↔ u₁ ≤ v₁ ∧ u₂ ≤ v₂ :=
Sum.forall
lemma const_le_elim_iff {b : β} {v₁ : α₁ → β} {v₂ : α₂ → β} :
Function.const _ b ≤ Sum.elim v₁ v₂ ↔ Function.const _ b ≤ v₁ ∧ Function.const _ b ≤ v₂ :=
elim_const_const b ▸ elim_le_elim_iff ..
lemma elim_le_const_iff {b : β} {u₁ : α₁ → β} {u₂ : α₂ → β} :
Sum.elim u₁ u₂ ≤ Function.const _ b ↔ u₁ ≤ Function.const _ b ∧ u₂ ≤ Function.const _ b :=
elim_const_const b ▸ elim_le_elim_iff ..
end Sum
section Pi
/-- A function `a` is strongly less than a function `b` if `a i < b i` for all `i`. -/
def StrongLT [∀ i, LT (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : Prop :=
∀ i, a i < b i
@[inherit_doc]
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => StrongLT
variable [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {a b c : ∀ i, π i}
theorem le_of_strongLT (h : a ≺ b) : a ≤ b := fun _ ↦ (h _).le
theorem lt_of_strongLT [Nonempty ι] (h : a ≺ b) : a < b := by
inhabit ι
exact Pi.lt_def.2 ⟨le_of_strongLT h, default, h _⟩
theorem strongLT_of_strongLT_of_le (hab : a ≺ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ≺ c := fun _ ↦
(hab _).trans_le <| hbc _
theorem strongLT_of_le_of_strongLT (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≺ c) : a ≺ c := fun _ ↦
(hab _).trans_lt <| hbc _
alias StrongLT.le := le_of_strongLT
alias StrongLT.lt := lt_of_strongLT
alias StrongLT.trans_le := strongLT_of_strongLT_of_le
alias LE.le.trans_strongLT := strongLT_of_le_of_strongLT
end Pi
section Function
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} {i : ι} {a b : π i}
theorem le_update_iff : x ≤ Function.update y i a ↔ x i ≤ a ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j :=
Function.forall_update_iff _ fun j z ↦ x j ≤ z
theorem update_le_iff : Function.update x i a ≤ y ↔ a ≤ y i ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j :=
Function.forall_update_iff _ fun j z ↦ z ≤ y j
theorem update_le_update_iff :
Function.update x i a ≤ Function.update y i b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j := by
simp +contextual [update_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_le_update_iff' : update x i a ≤ update x i b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [update_le_update_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_lt_update_iff : update x i a < update x i b ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' update_le_update_iff' update_le_update_iff'
@[simp]
theorem le_update_self_iff : x ≤ update x i a ↔ x i ≤ a := by simp [le_update_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_le_self_iff : update x i a ≤ x ↔ a ≤ x i := by simp [update_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lt_update_self_iff : x < update x i a ↔ x i < a := by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
@[simp]
theorem update_lt_self_iff : update x i a < x ↔ a < x i := by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
end Function
instance Pi.sdiff [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] : SDiff (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun x y i ↦ x i \ y i⟩
theorem Pi.sdiff_def [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] (x y : ∀ i, π i) :
x \ y = fun i ↦ x i \ y i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Pi.sdiff_apply [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] (x y : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
(x \ y) i = x i \ y i :=
rfl
namespace Function
variable [Preorder α] [Nonempty β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem const_le_const : const β a ≤ const β b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem const_lt_const : const β a < const β b ↔ a < b := by simpa [Pi.lt_def] using le_of_lt
end Function
/-! ### Lifts of order instances -/
/-- Transfer a `Preorder` on `β` to a `Preorder` on `α` using a function `f : α → β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev Preorder.lift [Preorder β] (f : α → β) : Preorder α where
le x y := f x ≤ f y
le_refl _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ := _root_.le_trans
lt x y := f x < f y
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := _root_.lt_iff_le_not_le
/-- Transfer a `PartialOrder` on `β` to a `PartialOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PartialOrder.lift [PartialOrder β] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f) : PartialOrder α :=
{ Preorder.lift f with le_antisymm := fun _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ inj (h₁.antisymm h₂) }
theorem compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq (a b : α) [LinearOrder β]
[DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f)
[Decidable (LT.lt (self := PartialOrder.lift f inj |>.toLT) a b)] :
compare (f a) (f b) =
@compareOfLessAndEq _ a b (PartialOrder.lift f inj |>.toLT) _ _ := by
have h := LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq (f a) (f b)
simp only [h, compareOfLessAndEq]
split_ifs <;> try (first | rfl | contradiction)
· have : ¬ f a = f b := by rename_i h; exact inj.ne h
contradiction
· have : f a = f b := by rename_i h; exact congrArg f h
contradiction
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]` as arguments, then uses
them for `max` and `min` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift'` for a version that autogenerates `min` and
`max` fields, and `LinearOrder.liftWithOrd` for one that does not auto-generate `compare`
fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.lift [LinearOrder β] [Max α] [Min α] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f)
(hsup : ∀ x y, f (x ⊔ y) = max (f x) (f y)) (hinf : ∀ x y, f (x ⊓ y) = min (f x) (f y)) :
LinearOrder α :=
letI instOrdα : Ord α := ⟨fun a b ↦ compare (f a) (f b)⟩
letI decidableLE := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x ≤ f y))
letI decidableLT := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x < f y))
letI decidableEq := fun x y ↦ decidable_of_iff (f x = f y) inj.eq_iff
{ PartialOrder.lift f inj, instOrdα with
le_total := fun x y ↦ le_total (f x) (f y)
toDecidableLE := decidableLE
toDecidableLT := decidableLT
toDecidableEq := decidableEq
min := (· ⊓ ·)
max := (· ⊔ ·)
min_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hinf _ _).trans (min_def _ _)
max_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hsup _ _).trans (max_def _ _)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := fun a b ↦
compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b f inj }
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version autogenerates `min` and `max` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift`
for a version that takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]`, then uses them as `max` and `min`. See
`LinearOrder.liftWithOrd'` for a version which does not auto-generate `compare` fields.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.lift' [LinearOrder β] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f) : LinearOrder α :=
@LinearOrder.lift α β _ ⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then y else x⟩
⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then x else y⟩ f inj
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (max_def _ _).symm) fun _ _ ↦
(apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (min_def _ _).symm
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]` as arguments, then uses
them for `max` and `min` fields. It also takes `[Ord α]` as an argument and uses them for `compare`
fields. See `LinearOrder.lift` for a version that autogenerates `compare` fields, and
`LinearOrder.liftWithOrd'` for one that auto-generates `min` and `max` fields.
fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.liftWithOrd [LinearOrder β] [Max α] [Min α] [Ord α] (f : α → β)
(inj : Injective f) (hsup : ∀ x y, f (x ⊔ y) = max (f x) (f y))
(hinf : ∀ x y, f (x ⊓ y) = min (f x) (f y))
(compare_f : ∀ a b : α, compare a b = compare (f a) (f b)) : LinearOrder α :=
letI decidableLE := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x ≤ f y))
letI decidableLT := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x < f y))
letI decidableEq := fun x y ↦ decidable_of_iff (f x = f y) inj.eq_iff
{ PartialOrder.lift f inj with
le_total := fun x y ↦ le_total (f x) (f y)
toDecidableLE := decidableLE
toDecidableLT := decidableLT
toDecidableEq := decidableEq
min := (· ⊓ ·)
max := (· ⊔ ·)
min_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hinf _ _).trans (min_def _ _)
max_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hsup _ _).trans (max_def _ _)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := fun a b ↦
(compare_f a b).trans <| compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b f inj }
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version auto-generates `min` and `max` fields. It also takes `[Ord α]`
as an argument and uses them for `compare` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift` for a version that
autogenerates `compare` fields, and `LinearOrder.liftWithOrd` for one that doesn't auto-generate
`min` and `max` fields. fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.liftWithOrd' [LinearOrder β] [Ord α] (f : α → β)
(inj : Injective f)
(compare_f : ∀ a b : α, compare a b = compare (f a) (f b)) : LinearOrder α :=
@LinearOrder.liftWithOrd α β _ ⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then y else x⟩
⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then x else y⟩ _ f inj
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (max_def _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (min_def _ _).symm)
compare_f
/-! ### Subtype of an order -/
namespace Subtype
instance le [LE α] {p : α → Prop} : LE (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (x : α) ≤ y⟩
instance lt [LT α] {p : α → Prop} : LT (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (x : α) < y⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk [LE α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : α} {hx : p x} {hy : p y} :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : Subtype p) ≤ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt_mk [LT α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : α} {hx : p x} {hy : p y} :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : Subtype p) < ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x < y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe [LE α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : Subtype p} : (x : α) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, GCongr.coe_le_coe⟩ := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe [LT α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : Subtype p} : (x : α) < y ↔ x < y :=
Iff.rfl
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, GCongr.coe_lt_coe⟩ := coe_lt_coe
instance preorder [Preorder α] (p : α → Prop) : Preorder (Subtype p) :=
Preorder.lift (fun (a : Subtype p) ↦ (a : α))
instance partialOrder [PartialOrder α] (p : α → Prop) : PartialOrder (Subtype p) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun (a : Subtype p) ↦ (a : α)) Subtype.coe_injective
instance decidableLE [Preorder α] [h : DecidableLE α] {p : α → Prop} :
DecidableLE (Subtype p) := fun a b ↦ h a b
instance decidableLT [Preorder α] [h : DecidableLT α] {p : α → Prop} :
DecidableLT (Subtype p) := fun a b ↦ h a b
/-- A subtype of a linear order is a linear order. We explicitly give the proofs of decidable
equality and decidable order in order to ensure the decidability instances are all definitionally
equal. -/
instance instLinearOrder [LinearOrder α] (p : α → Prop) : LinearOrder (Subtype p) :=
@LinearOrder.lift (Subtype p) _ _ ⟨fun x y ↦ ⟨max x y, max_rec' _ x.2 y.2⟩⟩
⟨fun x y ↦ ⟨min x y, min_rec' _ x.2 y.2⟩⟩ (fun (a : Subtype p) ↦ (a : α))
Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦
rfl
end Subtype
/-!
### Pointwise order on `α × β`
The lexicographic order is defined in `Data.Prod.Lex`, and the instances are available via the
type synonym `α ×ₗ β = α × β`.
-/
namespace Prod
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {x y : α × β} {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β}
instance : LE (α × β) where le p q := p.1 ≤ q.1 ∧ p.2 ≤ q.2
instance instDecidableLE [Decidable (x.1 ≤ y.1)] [Decidable (x.2 ≤ y.2)] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ≤ y.1 ∧ x.2 ≤ y.2))
lemma le_def : x ≤ y ↔ x.1 ≤ y.1 ∧ x.2 ≤ y.2 := .rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_le_mk : (a₁, b₁) ≤ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := .rfl
@[simp] lemma swap_le_swap : x.swap ≤ y.swap ↔ x ≤ y := and_comm
@[simp] lemma swap_le_mk : x.swap ≤ (b, a) ↔ x ≤ (a, b) := and_comm
@[simp] lemma mk_le_swap : (b, a) ≤ x.swap ↔ (a, b) ≤ x := and_comm
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β} {x y : α × β}
instance : Preorder (α × β) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (LE (α × β))
le_refl := fun ⟨a, b⟩ ↦ ⟨le_refl a, le_refl b⟩
le_trans := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨hac, hbd⟩ ⟨hce, hdf⟩ ↦ ⟨le_trans hac hce, le_trans hbd hdf⟩
@[simp]
theorem swap_lt_swap : x.swap < y.swap ↔ x < y :=
and_congr swap_le_swap (not_congr swap_le_swap)
@[simp] lemma swap_lt_mk : x.swap < (b, a) ↔ x < (a, b) := by rw [← swap_lt_swap]; simp
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_swap : (b, a) < x.swap ↔ (a, b) < x := by rw [← swap_lt_swap]; simp
theorem mk_le_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ≤ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
and_iff_left le_rfl
theorem mk_le_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ≤ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
and_iff_right le_rfl
theorem mk_lt_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) < (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ < a₂ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' mk_le_mk_iff_left mk_le_mk_iff_left
theorem mk_lt_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) < (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' mk_le_mk_iff_right mk_le_mk_iff_right
theorem lt_iff : x < y ↔ x.1 < y.1 ∧ x.2 ≤ y.2 ∨ x.1 ≤ y.1 ∧ x.2 < y.2 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases h₁ : y.1 ≤ x.1
· exact Or.inr ⟨h.1.1, LE.le.lt_of_not_le h.1.2 fun h₂ ↦ h.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨LE.le.lt_of_not_le h.1.1 h₁, h.1.2⟩
· rintro (⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨h₁, h₂⟩)
· exact ⟨⟨h₁.le, h₂⟩, fun h ↦ h₁.not_le h.1⟩
· exact ⟨⟨h₁, h₂.le⟩, fun h ↦ h₂.not_le h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt_mk : (a₁, b₁) < (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ < a₂ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ ∨ a₁ ≤ a₂ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
lt_iff
protected lemma lt_of_lt_of_le (h₁ : x.1 < y.1) (h₂ : x.2 ≤ y.2) : x < y := by simp [lt_iff, *]
protected lemma lt_of_le_of_lt (h₁ : x.1 ≤ y.1) (h₂ : x.2 < y.2) : x < y := by simp [lt_iff, *]
lemma mk_lt_mk_of_lt_of_le (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : (a₁, b₁) < (a₂, b₂) := by
simp [lt_iff, *]
lemma mk_lt_mk_of_le_of_lt (h₁ : a₁ ≤ a₂) (h₂ : b₁ < b₂) : (a₁, b₁) < (a₂, b₂) := by
simp [lt_iff, *]
end Preorder
/-- The pointwise partial order on a product.
(The lexicographic ordering is defined in `Order.Lexicographic`, and the instances are
available via the type synonym `α ×ₗ β = α × β`.) -/
instance instPartialOrder (α β : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] :
PartialOrder (α × β) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Preorder (α × β))
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hac, hbd⟩ ⟨hca, hdb⟩ ↦ Prod.ext (hac.antisymm hca) (hbd.antisymm hdb)
end Prod
/-! ### Additional order classes -/
/-- An order is dense if there is an element between any pair of distinct comparable elements. -/
class DenselyOrdered (α : Type*) [LT α] : Prop where
/-- An order is dense if there is an element between any pair of distinct elements. -/
dense : ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, a₁ < a₂ → ∃ a, a₁ < a ∧ a < a₂
theorem exists_between [LT α] [DenselyOrdered α] : ∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ < a₂ → ∃ a, a₁ < a ∧ a < a₂ :=
DenselyOrdered.dense _ _
instance OrderDual.denselyOrdered (α : Type*) [LT α] [h : DenselyOrdered α] :
DenselyOrdered αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun _ _ ha ↦ (@exists_between α _ h _ _ ha).imp fun _ ↦ And.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem denselyOrdered_orderDual [LT α] : DenselyOrdered αᵒᵈ ↔ DenselyOrdered α :=
⟨by convert @OrderDual.denselyOrdered αᵒᵈ _, @OrderDual.denselyOrdered α _⟩
/-- Any ordered subsingleton is densely ordered. Not an instance to avoid a heavy subsingleton
typeclass search. -/
lemma Subsingleton.instDenselyOrdered {X : Type*} [Subsingleton X] [Preorder X] :
DenselyOrdered X :=
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ (not_lt_of_subsingleton h).elim⟩
instance [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [DenselyOrdered α] [DenselyOrdered β] : DenselyOrdered (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b ↦ by
simp_rw [Prod.lt_iff]
rintro (⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨h₁, h₂⟩)
· obtain ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := exists_between h₁
exact ⟨(c, _), Or.inl ⟨ha, h₂⟩, Or.inl ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := exists_between h₂
exact ⟨(_, c), Or.inr ⟨h₁, ha⟩, Or.inr ⟨le_rfl, hb⟩⟩⟩
instance [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] [∀ i, DenselyOrdered (π i)] :
DenselyOrdered (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b ↦ by
classical
simp_rw [Pi.lt_def]
rintro ⟨hab, i, hi⟩
obtain ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := exists_between hi
exact
⟨Function.update a i c,
⟨le_update_iff.2 ⟨ha.le, fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl⟩, i, by rwa [update_self]⟩,
update_le_iff.2 ⟨hb.le, fun _ _ ↦ hab _⟩, i, by rwa [update_self]⟩⟩
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a₁ a₂ : α}
theorem le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense (h : ∀ a, a₂ < a → a₁ ≤ a) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_not_gt fun ha ↦
let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_between ha
lt_irrefl a <| lt_of_lt_of_le ‹a < a₁› (h _ ‹a₂ < a›)
lemma forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense : (∀ a, a₂ < a → a₁ ≤ a) ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense, fun ha _a ha₂ ↦ ha.trans ha₂.le⟩
lemma eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : ∀ a, a₂ < a → a₁ ≤ a) : a₁ = a₂ :=
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense h₂) h₁
theorem le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (h : ∀ a < a₁, a ≤ a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_not_gt fun ha ↦
let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := exists_between ha
lt_irrefl a <| lt_of_le_of_lt (h _ ‹a < a₁›) ‹a₂ < a›
lemma forall_lt_imp_le_iff_le_of_dense : (∀ a < a₁, a ≤ a₂) ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense, fun ha _a ha₁ ↦ ha₁.le.trans ha⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : ∀ a < a₁, a ≤ a₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
(le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense h₂).antisymm h₁
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias le_of_forall_le_of_dense := le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias le_of_forall_ge_of_dense := le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias forall_lt_le_iff := forall_lt_imp_le_iff_le_of_dense
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias forall_gt_ge_iff := forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense := eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias eq_of_le_of_forall_ge_of_dense := eq_of_le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense
end LinearOrder
theorem dense_or_discrete [LinearOrder α] (a₁ a₂ : α) :
(∃ a, a₁ < a ∧ a < a₂) ∨ (∀ a, a₁ < a → a₂ ≤ a) ∧ ∀ a < a₂, a ≤ a₁ :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h ↦
⟨fun a ha₁ ↦ le_of_not_gt fun ha₂ ↦ h ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
fun a ha₂ ↦ le_of_not_gt fun ha₁ ↦ h ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩
/-- If a linear order has no elements `x < y < z`, then it has at most two elements. -/
lemma eq_or_eq_or_eq_of_forall_not_lt_lt [LinearOrder α]
(h : ∀ ⦃x y z : α⦄, x < y → y < z → False) (x y z : α) : x = y ∨ y = z ∨ x = z := by
by_contra hne
simp only [not_or, ← Ne.eq_def] at hne
rcases hne.1.lt_or_lt with h₁ | h₁ <;>
rcases hne.2.1.lt_or_lt with h₂ | h₂ <;>
rcases hne.2.2.lt_or_lt with h₃ | h₃
exacts [h h₁ h₂, h h₂ h₃, h h₃ h₂, h h₃ h₁, h h₁ h₃, h h₂ h₃, h h₁ h₃, h h₂ h₁]
namespace PUnit
variable (a b : PUnit)
instance instLinearOrder : LinearOrder PUnit where
le := fun _ _ ↦ True
lt := fun _ _ ↦ False
max := fun _ _ ↦ unit
min := fun _ _ ↦ unit
toDecidableEq := inferInstance
toDecidableLE := fun _ _ ↦ Decidable.isTrue trivial
toDecidableLT := fun _ _ ↦ Decidable.isFalse id
le_refl := by intros; trivial
le_trans := by intros; trivial
le_total := by intros; exact Or.inl trivial
le_antisymm := by intros; rfl
lt_iff_le_not_le := by simp only [not_true, and_false, forall_const]
theorem max_eq : max a b = unit :=
rfl
theorem min_eq : min a b = unit :=
rfl
protected theorem le : a ≤ b :=
trivial
theorem not_lt : ¬a < b :=
not_false
instance : DenselyOrdered PUnit :=
⟨fun _ _ ↦ False.elim⟩
end PUnit
section «Prop»
/-- Propositions form a complete boolean algebra, where the `≤` relation is given by implication. -/
instance Prop.le : LE Prop :=
⟨(· → ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem le_Prop_eq : ((· ≤ ·) : Prop → Prop → Prop) = (· → ·) :=
rfl
theorem subrelation_iff_le {r s : α → α → Prop} : Subrelation r s ↔ r ≤ s :=
Iff.rfl
instance Prop.partialOrder : PartialOrder Prop where
__ := Prop.le
le_refl _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ f g := g ∘ f
le_antisymm _ _ Hab Hba := propext ⟨Hab, Hba⟩
end «Prop»
/-! ### Linear order from a total partial order -/
/-- Type synonym to create an instance of `LinearOrder` from a `PartialOrder` and `IsTotal α (≤)` -/
def AsLinearOrder (α : Type*) :=
α
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (AsLinearOrder α) :=
⟨(default : α)⟩
noncomputable instance AsLinearOrder.linearOrder [PartialOrder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] :
LinearOrder (AsLinearOrder α) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder α)
le_total := @total_of α (· ≤ ·) _
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
| Mathlib/Order/Basic.lean | 1,562 | 1,563 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
/-!
# Second intersection of a sphere and a line
This file defines and proves basic results about the second intersection of a sphere with a line
through a point on that sphere.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.Sphere.secondInter` is the second intersection of a sphere with a line
through a point on that sphere.
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The second intersection of a sphere with a line through a point on that sphere; that point
if it is the only point of intersection of the line with the sphere. The intended use of this
definition is when `p ∈ s`; the definition does not use `s.radius`, so in general it returns
the second intersection with the sphere through `p` and with center `s.center`. -/
def Sphere.secondInter (s : Sphere P) (p : P) (v : V) : P :=
(-2 * ⟪v, p -ᵥ s.center⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫) • v +ᵥ p
/-- The distance between `secondInter` and the center equals the distance between the original
point and the center. -/
@[simp]
theorem Sphere.secondInter_dist (s : Sphere P) (p : P) (v : V) :
dist (s.secondInter p v) s.center = dist p s.center := by
rw [Sphere.secondInter]
| by_cases hv : v = 0; · simp [hv]
rw [dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist _ _ hv]
exact Or.inr rfl
/-- The point given by `secondInter` lies on the sphere. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Sphere/SecondInter.lean | 44 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# Continuity and Von Neumann boundedness
This files proves that for `E` and `F` two topological vector spaces over `ℝ` or `ℂ`,
if `E` is first countable, then every locally bounded linear map `E →ₛₗ[σ] F` is continuous
(this is `LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded`).
We keep this file separate from `Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded` in order not to import
`Analysis/NormedSpace/RCLike` there, because defining the strong topology on the space of
continuous linear maps will require importing `Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded` in
`Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm`.
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Bornology Filter Topology Pointwise
variable {𝕜 𝕜' E F : Type*}
variable [AddCommGroup E] [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
variable [AddCommGroup F] [UniformSpace F]
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [IsUniformAddGroup F]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- Construct a continuous linear map from a linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` and the existence of a
neighborhood of zero that gets mapped into a bounded set in `F`. -/
def LinearMap.clmOfExistsBoundedImage (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(h : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' V)) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
⟨f, by
-- It suffices to show that `f` is continuous at `0`.
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero f ?_
rw [continuousAt_def, f.map_zero]
intro U hU
-- Continuity means that `U ∈ 𝓝 0` implies that `f ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 0`.
rcases h with ⟨V, hV, h⟩
rcases (h hU).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr, h⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 r with ⟨x, hx⟩
specialize h x hx.le
-- After unfolding all the definitions, we know that `f '' V ⊆ x • U`. We use this to show the
-- inclusion `x⁻¹ • V ⊆ f⁻¹' U`.
have x_ne := norm_pos_iff.mp (hr.trans hx)
have : x⁻¹ • V ⊆ f ⁻¹' U :=
calc
x⁻¹ • V ⊆ x⁻¹ • f ⁻¹' (f '' V) := Set.smul_set_mono (Set.subset_preimage_image (⇑f) V)
_ ⊆ x⁻¹ • f ⁻¹' (x • U) := Set.smul_set_mono (Set.preimage_mono h)
_ = f ⁻¹' (x⁻¹ • x • U) := by
ext
simp only [Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ x_ne, Set.mem_preimage, LinearMap.map_smul]
_ ⊆ f ⁻¹' U := by rw [inv_smul_smul₀ x_ne _]
-- Using this inclusion, it suffices to show that `x⁻¹ • V` is in `𝓝 0`, which is trivial.
refine mem_of_superset ?_ this
rwa [set_smul_mem_nhds_zero_iff (inv_ne_zero x_ne)]⟩
theorem LinearMap.clmOfExistsBoundedImage_coe {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F}
{h : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' V)} :
(f.clmOfExistsBoundedImage h : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.clmOfExistsBoundedImage_apply {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F}
{h : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' V)} {x : E} :
f.clmOfExistsBoundedImage h x = f x :=
rfl
end NontriviallyNormedField
section RCLike
open TopologicalSpace Bornology
variable [FirstCountableTopology E]
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [RCLike 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜' F] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜' F]
variable {σ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜'}
theorem LinearMap.continuousAt_zero_of_locally_bounded (f : E →ₛₗ[σ] F)
(hf : ∀ s, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s → IsVonNBounded 𝕜' (f '' s)) : ContinuousAt f 0 := by
-- Assume that f is not continuous at 0
by_contra h
-- We use a decreasing balanced basis for 0 : E and a balanced basis for 0 : F
-- and reformulate non-continuity in terms of these bases
| rcases (nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜 E).exists_antitone_subbasis with ⟨b, bE1, bE⟩
simp only [_root_.id] at bE
have bE' : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun x : ℕ => x ≠ 0) fun n : ℕ => (n : 𝕜)⁻¹ • b n := by
refine bE.1.to_hasBasis ?_ ?_
· intro n _
use n + 1
simp only [Ne, Nat.succ_ne_zero, not_false_iff, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, true_and]
-- `b (n + 1) ⊆ b n` follows from `Antitone`.
have h : b (n + 1) ⊆ b n := bE.2 (by simp)
refine _root_.trans ?_ h
rintro y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩
-- Since `b (n + 1)` is balanced `(n+1)⁻¹ b (n + 1) ⊆ b (n + 1)`
rw [← hy]
refine (bE1 (n + 1)).2.smul_mem ?_ hx
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) + 1 := n.cast_add_one_pos
rw [norm_inv, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, RCLike.norm_natCast, Nat.cast_add,
Nat.cast_one, inv_le_comm₀ h' zero_lt_one]
simp
intro n hn
-- The converse direction follows from continuity of the scalar multiplication
have hcont : ContinuousAt (fun x : E => (n : 𝕜) • x) 0 :=
(continuous_const_smul (n : 𝕜)).continuousAt
simp only [ContinuousAt, map_zero, smul_zero] at hcont
rw [bE.1.tendsto_left_iff] at hcont
rcases hcont (b n) (bE1 n).1 with ⟨i, _, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, trivial, fun x hx => ⟨(n : 𝕜) • x, hi hx, ?_⟩⟩
simp [← mul_smul, hn]
rw [ContinuousAt, map_zero, bE'.tendsto_iff (nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜' F)] at h
push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨V, ⟨hV, -⟩, h⟩
simp only [_root_.id, forall_true_left] at h
-- There exists `u : ℕ → E` such that for all `n : ℕ` we have `u n ∈ n⁻¹ • b n` and `f (u n) ∉ V`
choose! u hu hu' using h
-- The sequence `(fun n ↦ n • u n)` converges to `0`
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : 𝕜) • u n) atTop (𝓝 (0 : E)) := by
apply bE.tendsto
intro n
by_cases h : n = 0
· rw [h, Nat.cast_zero, zero_smul]
exact mem_of_mem_nhds (bE.1.mem_of_mem <| by trivial)
rcases hu n h with ⟨y, hy, hu1⟩
convert hy
rw [← hu1, ← mul_smul]
simp only [h, mul_inv_cancel₀, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff, one_smul]
-- The image `(fun n ↦ n • u n)` is von Neumann bounded:
have h_bounded : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (Set.range fun n : ℕ => (n : 𝕜) • u n) :=
h_tendsto.cauchySeq.totallyBounded_range.isVonNBounded 𝕜
-- Since `range u` is bounded, `V` absorbs it
rcases (hf _ h_bounded hV).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr, h'⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt r
-- We now find a contradiction between `f (u n) ∉ V` and the absorbing property
have h1 : r ≤ ‖(n : 𝕜')‖ := by
rw [RCLike.norm_natCast]
exact hn.le
have hn' : 0 < ‖(n : 𝕜')‖ := lt_of_lt_of_le hr h1
rw [norm_pos_iff, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hn'
have h'' : f (u n) ∈ V := by
simp only [Set.image_subset_iff] at h'
specialize h' (n : 𝕜') h1 (Set.mem_range_self n)
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, map_natCast] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨y, hy, h'⟩
apply_fun fun y : F => (n : 𝕜')⁻¹ • y at h'
simp only [hn', inv_smul_smul₀, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff] at h'
rwa [← h']
exact hu' n hn' h''
/-- If `E` is first countable, then every locally bounded linear map `E →ₛₗ[σ] F` is continuous. -/
theorem LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded [IsUniformAddGroup F] (f : E →ₛₗ[σ] F)
(hf : ∀ s, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s → IsVonNBounded 𝕜' (f '' s)) : Continuous f :=
(uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero f <| f.continuousAt_zero_of_locally_bounded hf).continuous
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/ContinuousOfBounded.lean | 96 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.MapDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Monoid algebras
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) where
algebraMap := singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
instance isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleOneAlgHom : A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleOneRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap k A)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom (k := k).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
-- The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v) :
V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
rw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
of_apply, h g v]
variable (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
end
end
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f :) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] where
algebraMap := singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
instance isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleZeroAlgHom : k →ₐ[R] k[G]) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleZeroRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k[G]) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom (R := R).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x.toAdd 1) :=
rfl
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
end lift
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two additive magmas, then `Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a
non-unital algebra homomorphism between their additive magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Add G] [Add H] [FunLike F G H] [AddHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₙₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G]
{H F : Type*} [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (AddMonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (AddMonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [AddMonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G₁] [AddMonoid G₂] [AddMonoid G₃] (f : G₁ →+ G₂) (g : G₂ →+ G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`AddMonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃+ H) : A[G] ≃ₐ[k] A[H] :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃+ H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (AddEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- The algebra equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative`. -/
def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicativeAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative k G with
commutes' := fun r => by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative] }
/-- The algebra equivalence between `MonoidAlgebra` and `AddMonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Additive`. -/
def MonoidAlgebra.toAdditiveAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [Monoid G] :
MonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] AddMonoidAlgebra k (Additive G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive k G with commutes' := fun r => by simp [MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive] }
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 604 | 606 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.ExistsUnique
import Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
/-!
# Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas
-/
open Function
universe u v w
namespace Function
section
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Evaluate a function at an argument. Useful if you want to talk about the partially applied
`Function.eval x : (∀ x, β x) → β x`. -/
@[reducible, simp] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : β x := f x
theorem eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : eval x f = f x :=
rfl
theorem const_def {y : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ y) = const α y :=
rfl
theorem const_injective [Nonempty α] : Injective (const α : β → α → β) := fun _ _ h ↦
let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem const_inj [Nonempty α] {y₁ y₂ : β} : const α y₁ = const α y₂ ↔ y₁ = y₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ const_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem onFun_apply (f : β → β → γ) (g : α → β) (a b : α) : onFun f g a b = f (g a) (g b) :=
rfl
lemma hfunext {α α' : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : ∀a, β a} {f' : ∀a, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', HEq a a' → HEq (f a) (f' a')) : HEq f f' := by
subst hα
have : ∀a, HEq (f a) (f' a) := fun a ↦ h a a (HEq.refl a)
have : β = β' := by funext a; exact type_eq_of_heq (this a)
subst this
apply heq_of_eq
funext a
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
theorem ne_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : ∀ a, β a} : f₁ ≠ f₂ ↔ ∃ a, f₁ a ≠ f₂ a :=
funext_iff.not.trans not_forall
lemma funext_iff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {g : α → β} (x y : α) :
f x = g y ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ funext fun z ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Subsingleton.elim x z, Subsingleton.elim y z] at h
· rw [h, Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem swap_lt {α} [LT α] : swap (· < · : α → α → _) = (· > ·) := rfl
theorem swap_le {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≤ · : α → α → _) = (· ≥ ·) := rfl
theorem swap_gt {α} [LT α] : swap (· > · : α → α → _) = (· < ·) := rfl
theorem swap_ge {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≥ · : α → α → _) = (· ≤ ·) := rfl
protected theorem Bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Injective f := hf.1
protected theorem Bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Surjective f := hf.2
theorem not_injective_iff : ¬ Injective f ↔ ∃ a b, f a = f b ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp only [Injective, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- If the co-domain `β` of an injective function `f : α → β` has decidable equality, then
the domain `α` also has decidable equality. -/
protected def Injective.decidableEq [DecidableEq β] (I : Injective f) : DecidableEq α :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
theorem Injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Injective g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ I <| congr_arg f h
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff (hf : Injective f) (g : γ → α) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨Injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
theorem Injective.of_comp_right {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective f := fun x y h ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hg x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hg y
exact congr_arg g (I h)
theorem Surjective.bijective₂_of_injective {g : γ → α} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g)
(I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨I.of_comp_right hg, hf⟩, I.of_comp, hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨fun I ↦ I.of_comp_right hg.2, fun h ↦ h.comp hg.injective⟩
theorem Injective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Injective (f i)) : Injective (Pi.map f) := fun _ _ h ↦
funext fun i ↦ hf i <| congrFun h _
/-- Composition by an injective function on the left is itself injective. -/
theorem Injective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) : Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
.piMap fun _ ↦ hg
theorem injective_comp_left_iff [Nonempty α] {g : β → γ} :
Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨fun h b₁ b₂ eq ↦ Nonempty.elim ‹_›
(congr_fun <| h (a₁ := fun _ ↦ b₁) (a₂ := fun _ ↦ b₂) <| funext fun _ ↦ eq), (·.comp_left)⟩
@[nontriviality] theorem injective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : Injective f :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[nontriviality] theorem bijective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) : Bijective f :=
⟨injective_of_subsingleton f, fun a ↦ ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim ..⟩⟩
lemma Injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : Injective f) (hf' : Injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
Function.Injective (fun x ↦ if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) := fun x₁ x₂ h => by
dsimp only at h
by_cases h₁ : p x₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : p x₂
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; injection (hf h)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h.symm).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; injection (hf' h)
theorem Surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Surjective f := fun y ↦
let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y
⟨g x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨Surjective.of_comp, fun h ↦ h.comp hg⟩
theorem Surjective.of_comp_left {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective g := fun a ↦ let ⟨c, hc⟩ := S (f a); ⟨c, hf hc⟩
theorem Injective.bijective₂_of_surjective {g : γ → α} (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g)
(S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨hf, S.of_comp⟩, hg, S.of_comp_left hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff' (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective g :=
⟨fun S ↦ S.of_comp_left hf.1, hf.surjective.comp⟩
instance decidableEqPFun (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, DecidableEq (α hp)] :
DecidableEq (∀ hp, α hp)
| f, g => decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
protected theorem Surjective.forall (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun h x ↦ h (f x), fun h y ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
hx ▸ h x⟩
protected theorem Surjective.forall₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall
protected theorem Surjective.forall₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall₂
protected theorem Surjective.exists (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
protected theorem Surjective.exists₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists
protected theorem Surjective.exists₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists₂
theorem Surjective.injective_comp_right (hf : Surjective f) : Injective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun _ _ h ↦ funext <| hf.forall.2 <| congr_fun h
theorem injective_comp_right_iff_surjective {γ : Type*} [Nontrivial γ] :
Injective (fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨not_imp_not.mp fun not_surj inj ↦ not_subsingleton γ ⟨fun c c' ↦ ?_⟩,
(·.injective_comp_right)⟩
have ⟨b₀, hb⟩ := not_forall.mp not_surj
classical have := inj (a₁ := fun _ ↦ c) (a₂ := (if · = b₀ then c' else c)) ?_
· simpa using congr_fun this b₀
ext a; simp only [comp_apply, if_neg fun h ↦ hb ⟨a, h⟩]
protected theorem Surjective.right_cancellable (hf : Surjective f) {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.injective_comp_right.eq_iff
theorem surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (h : ∀ g₁ g₂ : β → Prop, g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f → g₁ = g₂) :
Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective.mp h
theorem bijective_iff_existsUnique (f : α → β) : Bijective f ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃! a : α, f a = b :=
⟨fun hf b ↦
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf.surjective b
⟨a, ha, fun _ ha' ↦ hf.injective (ha'.trans ha.symm)⟩,
fun he ↦ ⟨fun {_a a'} h ↦ (he (f a')).unique h rfl, fun b ↦ (he b).exists⟩⟩
/-- Shorthand for using projection notation with `Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique`. -/
protected theorem Bijective.existsUnique {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (b : β) :
∃! a : α, f a = b :=
(bijective_iff_existsUnique f).mp hf b
theorem Bijective.existsUnique_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃! y, p y) ↔ ∃! x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hpy, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf.surjective y
⟨x, by simpa [hx], fun z (hz : p (f z)) ↦ hf.injective <| hx.symm ▸ hy _ hz⟩,
fun ⟨x, hpx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨f x, hpx, fun y hy ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf.surjective y
hz ▸ congr_arg f (hx _ (by simpa [hz]))⟩⟩
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Bijective f :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff' _ hg) (Surjective.of_comp_iff _ hg.surjective)
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Function.Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Function.Bijective g :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff hf.injective _) (Surjective.of_comp_iff' hf _)
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no surjective functions from `α`
to `Set α`. -/
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → Set α) : ¬Surjective f
| h => let ⟨D, e⟩ := h {a | ¬ f a a}
@iff_not_self (D ∈ f D) <| iff_of_eq <| congr_arg (D ∈ ·) e
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no injective functions from `Set α`
to `α`. -/
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : Set α → α) : ¬Injective f
| i => cantor_surjective (fun a ↦ {b | ∀ U, a = f U → U b}) <|
RightInverse.surjective (fun U ↦ Set.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ h U rfl, fun h _ e ↦ i e ▸ h⟩)
/-- There is no surjection from `α : Type u` into `Type (max u v)`. This theorem
demonstrates why `Type : Type` would be inconsistent in Lean. -/
theorem not_surjective_Type {α : Type u} (f : α → Type max u v) : ¬Surjective f := by
intro hf
let T : Type max u v := Sigma f
cases hf (Set T) with | intro U hU =>
let g : Set T → T := fun s ↦ ⟨U, cast hU.symm s⟩
have hg : Injective g := by
intro s t h
suffices cast hU (g s).2 = cast hU (g t).2 by
simp only [g, cast_cast, cast_eq] at this
assumption
· congr
exact cantor_injective g hg
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def IsPartialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → Option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem isPartialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) :
Injective f := fun _ _ h ↦
Option.some.inj <| ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x y b)
(h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem LeftInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem leftInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : LeftInverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨LeftInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem RightInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem rightInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : RightInverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
⟨RightInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem LeftInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : LeftInverse f g)
(hh : LeftInverse h i) : LeftInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
fun a ↦ show h (f (g (i a))) = a by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem RightInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : RightInverse f g)
(hh : RightInverse h i) : RightInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
LeftInverse.comp hh hf
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) : RightInverse f g :=
h
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse f g :=
h
theorem LeftInverse.surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : Surjective f :=
h.rightInverse.surjective
theorem RightInverse.injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : Injective f :=
h.leftInverse.injective
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hf : Injective f) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ hf <| h (f x)
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hg : Surjective g) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hg x; hy ▸ congr_arg g (h y)
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Surjective f → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Injective g → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective
theorem LeftInverse.eq_rightInverse {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g₁ f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g₂ f) : g₁ = g₂ :=
calc
g₁ = g₁ ∘ f ∘ g₂ := by rw [h₂.comp_eq_id, comp_id]
_ = g₂ := by rw [← comp_assoc, h₁.comp_eq_id, id_comp]
/-- We can use choice to construct explicitly a partial inverse for
a given injective function `f`. -/
noncomputable def partialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : Option α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none
theorem partialInv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : IsPartialInv f (partialInv f)
| a, b =>
⟨fun h =>
open scoped Classical in
have hpi : partialInv f b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none :=
rfl
if h' : ∃ a, f a = b
then by rw [hpi, dif_pos h'] at h
injection h with h
subst h
apply Classical.choose_spec h'
else by rw [hpi, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
fun e => e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I <| Classical.choose_spec h))⟩
theorem partialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : ∀ x, partialInv f (f x) = some x :=
isPartialInv_left (partialInv_of_injective I)
end
section InvFun
variable {α β : Sort*} [Nonempty α] {f : α → β} {b : β}
/-- The inverse of a function (which is a left inverse if `f` is injective
and a right inverse if `f` is surjective). -/
-- Explicit Sort so that `α` isn't inferred to be Prop via `exists_prop_decidable`
noncomputable def invFun {α : Sort u} {β} [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) : β → α :=
open scoped Classical in
fun y ↦ if h : (∃ x, f x = y) then h.choose else Classical.arbitrary α
theorem invFun_eq (h : ∃ a, f a = b) : f (invFun f b) = b := by
simp only [invFun, dif_pos h, h.choose_spec]
theorem apply_invFun_apply {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} {a : α} :
f (@invFun _ _ ⟨a⟩ f (f a)) = f a :=
@invFun_eq _ _ ⟨a⟩ _ _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem invFun_neg (h : ¬∃ a, f a = b) : invFun f b = Classical.choice ‹_› :=
dif_neg h
theorem invFun_eq_of_injective_of_rightInverse {g : β → α} (hf : Injective f)
(hg : RightInverse g f) : invFun f = g :=
funext fun b ↦
hf
(by
rw [hg b]
exact invFun_eq ⟨g b, hg b⟩)
theorem rightInverse_invFun (hf : Surjective f) : RightInverse (invFun f) f :=
fun b ↦ invFun_eq <| hf b
theorem leftInverse_invFun (hf : Injective f) : LeftInverse (invFun f) f :=
fun b ↦ hf <| invFun_eq ⟨b, rfl⟩
theorem invFun_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (invFun f) :=
(leftInverse_invFun hf).surjective
theorem invFun_comp (hf : Injective f) : invFun f ∘ f = id :=
funext <| leftInverse_invFun hf
theorem Injective.hasLeftInverse (hf : Injective f) : HasLeftInverse f :=
⟨invFun f, leftInverse_invFun hf⟩
theorem injective_iff_hasLeftInverse : Injective f ↔ HasLeftInverse f :=
⟨Injective.hasLeftInverse, HasLeftInverse.injective⟩
end InvFun
section SurjInv
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w} {f : α → β}
/-- The inverse of a surjective function. (Unlike `invFun`, this does not require
`α` to be inhabited.) -/
noncomputable def surjInv {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (b : β) : α :=
Classical.choose (h b)
theorem surjInv_eq (h : Surjective f) (b) : f (surjInv h b) = b :=
Classical.choose_spec (h b)
theorem rightInverse_surjInv (hf : Surjective f) : RightInverse (surjInv hf) f :=
surjInv_eq hf
theorem leftInverse_surjInv (hf : Bijective f) : LeftInverse (surjInv hf.2) f :=
rightInverse_of_injective_of_leftInverse hf.1 (rightInverse_surjInv hf.2)
theorem Surjective.hasRightInverse (hf : Surjective f) : HasRightInverse f :=
⟨_, rightInverse_surjInv hf⟩
theorem surjective_iff_hasRightInverse : Surjective f ↔ HasRightInverse f :=
⟨Surjective.hasRightInverse, HasRightInverse.surjective⟩
theorem bijective_iff_has_inverse : Bijective f ↔ ∃ g, LeftInverse g f ∧ RightInverse g f :=
⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨_, leftInverse_surjInv hf, rightInverse_surjInv hf.2⟩, fun ⟨_, gl, gr⟩ ↦
⟨gl.injective, gr.surjective⟩⟩
theorem injective_surjInv (h : Surjective f) : Injective (surjInv h) :=
(rightInverse_surjInv h).injective
theorem surjective_to_subsingleton [na : Nonempty α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) :
Surjective f :=
fun _ ↦ let ⟨a⟩ := na; ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
theorem Surjective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) : Surjective (Pi.map f) := fun g ↦
⟨fun i ↦ surjInv (hf i) (g i), funext fun _ ↦ rightInverse_surjInv _ _⟩
/-- Composition by a surjective function on the left is itself surjective. -/
theorem Surjective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
.piMap fun _ ↦ hg
theorem surjective_comp_left_iff [Nonempty α] {g : β → γ} :
Surjective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) ↔ Surjective g := by
refine ⟨fun h c ↦ Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun a ↦ ?_, (·.comp_left)⟩
have ⟨f, hf⟩ := h fun _ ↦ c
exact ⟨f a, congr_fun hf _⟩
theorem Bijective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Bijective (f i)) : Bijective (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
/-- Composition by a bijective function on the left is itself bijective. -/
theorem Bijective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
⟨hg.injective.comp_left, hg.surjective.comp_left⟩
end SurjInv
section Update
variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {α' : Sort w} [DecidableEq α]
{f : (a : α) → β a} {a : α} {b : β a}
/-- Replacing the value of a function at a given point by a given value. -/
def update (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then Eq.ndrec v h.symm else f a
@[simp]
theorem update_self (a : α) (v : β a) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias update_same := update_self
@[simp]
theorem update_of_ne {a a' : α} (h : a ≠ a') (v : β a') (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias update_noteq := update_of_ne
/-- On non-dependent functions, `Function.update` can be expressed as an `ite` -/
theorem update_apply {β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) (b : β) (a : α) :
update f a' b a = if a = a' then b else f a := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a a' with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[nontriviality]
theorem update_eq_const_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (a : α) (v : α') (f : α → α') :
update f a v = const α v :=
funext fun a' ↦ Subsingleton.elim a a' ▸ update_self ..
theorem surjective_eval {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [h : ∀ a, Nonempty (β a)] (a : α) :
Surjective (eval a : (∀ a, β a) → β a) := fun b ↦
⟨@update _ _ (Classical.decEq α) (fun a ↦ (h a).some) a b,
@update_self _ _ (Classical.decEq α) _ _ _⟩
theorem update_injective (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) : Injective (update f a') := fun v v' h ↦ by
have := congr_fun h a'
rwa [update_self, update_self] at this
lemma forall_update_iff (f : ∀a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀a, β a → Prop) :
(∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x, x ≠ a → p x (f x) := by
rw [← and_forall_ne a, update_self]
simp +contextual
theorem exists_update_iff (f : ∀ a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀ a, β a → Prop) :
(∃ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∨ ∃ x ≠ a, p x (f x) := by
rw [← not_forall_not, forall_update_iff f fun a b ↦ ¬p a b]
simp [-not_and, not_and_or]
theorem update_eq_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
update f a b = g ↔ b = g a ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, f x = g x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ y = g x
theorem eq_update_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
g = update f a b ↔ g a = b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, g x = f x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ g x = y
@[simp] lemma update_eq_self_iff : update f a b = f ↔ b = f a := by simp [update_eq_iff]
@[simp] lemma eq_update_self_iff : f = update f a b ↔ f a = b := by simp [eq_update_iff]
lemma ne_update_self_iff : f ≠ update f a b ↔ f a ≠ b := eq_update_self_iff.not
lemma update_ne_self_iff : update f a b ≠ f ↔ b ≠ f a := update_eq_self_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem update_eq_self (a : α) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a (f a) = f :=
update_eq_iff.2 ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' {α'} (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} {i : α} (a : β i)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : (fun j ↦ (update g i a) (f j)) = fun j ↦ g (f j) :=
funext fun _ ↦ update_of_ne (h _) _ _
variable [DecidableEq α']
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne {α β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'} {i : α'} (a : β)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' g a h
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective' (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) : (fun j ↦ update g (f i) a (f j)) = update (fun i ↦ g (f i)) i a :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨update_self .., fun _ hj ↦ update_of_ne (hf.ne hj) _ _⟩
theorem update_apply_of_injective
(g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) (j : α') :
update g (f i) a (f j) = update (fun i ↦ g (f i)) i a j :=
congr_fun (update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a) j
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective {β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (i : α) (a : β) :
Function.update g (f i) a ∘ f = Function.update (g ∘ f) i a :=
update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a
/-- Recursors can be pushed inside `Function.update`.
The `ctor` argument should be a one-argument constructor like `Sum.inl`,
and `recursor` should be an inductive recursor partially applied in all but that constructor,
such as `(Sum.rec · g)`.
In future, we should build some automation to generate applications like `Option.rec_update` for all
inductive types. -/
lemma rec_update {ι κ : Sort*} {α : κ → Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq κ]
{ctor : ι → κ} (hctor : Function.Injective ctor)
(recursor : ((i : ι) → α (ctor i)) → ((i : κ) → α i))
(h : ∀ f i, recursor f (ctor i) = f i)
(h2 : ∀ f₁ f₂ k, (∀ i, ctor i ≠ k) → recursor f₁ k = recursor f₂ k)
(f : (i : ι) → α (ctor i)) (i : ι) (x : α (ctor i)) :
recursor (update f i x) = update (recursor f) (ctor i) x := by
ext k
by_cases h : ∃ i, ctor i = k
· obtain ⟨i', rfl⟩ := h
obtain rfl | hi := eq_or_ne i' i
· simp [h]
· have hk := hctor.ne hi
simp [h, hi, hk, Function.update_of_ne]
· rw [not_exists] at h
rw [h2 _ f _ h]
rw [Function.update_of_ne (Ne.symm <| h i)]
@[simp]
lemma _root_.Option.rec_update {α : Type*} {β : Option α → Sort*} [DecidableEq α]
(f : β none) (g : ∀ a, β (.some a)) (a : α) (x : β (.some a)) :
Option.rec f (update g a x) = update (Option.rec f g) (.some a) x :=
Function.rec_update (@Option.some.inj _) (Option.rec f) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun
| _, _, .some _, h => (h _ rfl).elim
| _, _, .none, _ => rfl) _ _ _
theorem apply_update {ι : Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] {α β : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, α i → β i)
(g : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) = update (fun k ↦ f k (g k)) i (f i v) j := by
by_cases h : j = i
· subst j
simp
· simp [h]
theorem apply_update₂ {ι : Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] {α β γ : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, α i → β i → γ i)
(g : ∀ i, α i) (h : ∀ i, β i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (w : β i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) (update h i w j) = update (fun k ↦ f k (g k) (h k)) i (f i v w) j := by
by_cases h : j = i
· subst j
simp
· simp [h]
theorem pred_update (P : ∀ ⦃a⦄, β a → Prop) (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) :
P (update f a' v a) ↔ a = a' ∧ P v ∨ a ≠ a' ∧ P (f a) := by
rw [apply_update P, update_apply, ite_prop_iff_or]
theorem comp_update {α' : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (f : α' → β) (g : α → α') (i : α) (v : α') :
f ∘ update g i v = update (f ∘ g) i (f v) :=
funext <| apply_update _ _ _ _
theorem update_comm {α} [DecidableEq α] {β : α → Sort*} {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (v : β a) (w : β b)
(f : ∀ a, β a) : update (update f a v) b w = update (update f b w) a v := by
funext c
simp only [update]
by_cases h₁ : c = b <;> by_cases h₂ : c = a
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂]
cases h (h₂.symm.trans h₁)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂]
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₁]
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₁]
@[simp]
theorem update_idem {α} [DecidableEq α] {β : α → Sort*} {a : α} (v w : β a) (f : ∀ a, β a) :
update (update f a v) a w = update f a w := by
funext b
by_cases h : b = a <;> simp [update, h]
end Update
noncomputable section Extend
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Extension of a function `g : α → γ` along a function `f : α → β`.
For every `a : α`, `f a` is sent to `g a`. `f` might not be surjective, so we use an auxiliary
function `j : β → γ` by sending `b : β` not in the range of `f` to `j b`. If you do not care about
the behavior outside the range, `j` can be used as a junk value by setting it to be `0` or
`Classical.arbitrary` (assuming `γ` is nonempty).
This definition is mathematically meaningful only when `f a₁ = f a₂ → g a₁ = g a₂` (spelled
`g.FactorsThrough f`). In particular this holds if `f` is injective.
A typical use case is extending a function from a subtype to the entire type. If you wish to extend
`g : {b : β // p b} → γ` to a function `β → γ`, you should use `Function.extend Subtype.val g j`. -/
def extend (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (j : β → γ) : β → γ := fun b ↦
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (Classical.choose h) else j b
/-- g factors through f : `f a = f b → g a = g b` -/
def FactorsThrough (g : α → γ) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, f a = f b → g a = g b
theorem extend_def (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (b : β) [Decidable (∃ a, f a = b)] :
extend f g e' b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (Classical.choose h) else e' b := by
unfold extend
congr
lemma Injective.factorsThrough (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) : g.FactorsThrough f :=
fun _ _ h => congr_arg g (hf h)
lemma FactorsThrough.extend_apply {g : α → γ} (hf : g.FactorsThrough f) (e' : β → γ) (a : α) :
extend f g e' (f a) = g a := by
classical
simp only [extend_def, dif_pos, exists_apply_eq_apply]
exact hf (Classical.choose_spec (exists_apply_eq_apply f a))
@[simp]
theorem Injective.extend_apply (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (a : α) :
extend f g e' (f a) = g a :=
(hf.factorsThrough g).extend_apply e' a
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply' (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (b : β) (hb : ¬∃ a, f a = b) :
extend f g e' b = e' b := by
classical
simp [Function.extend_def, hb]
lemma factorsThrough_iff (g : α → γ) [Nonempty γ] : g.FactorsThrough f ↔ ∃ (e : β → γ), g = e ∘ f :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨extend f g (const β (Classical.arbitrary γ)),
funext (fun x => by simp only [comp_apply, hf.extend_apply])⟩,
fun h _ _ hf => by rw [Classical.choose_spec h, comp_apply, comp_apply, hf]⟩
lemma apply_extend {δ} {g : α → γ} (F : γ → δ) (f : α → β) (e' : β → γ) (b : β) :
F (extend f g e' b) = extend f (F ∘ g) (F ∘ e') b :=
open scoped Classical in apply_dite F _ _ _
theorem extend_injective (hf : Injective f) (e' : β → γ) : Injective fun g ↦ extend f g e' := by
intro g₁ g₂ hg
refine funext fun x ↦ ?_
have H := congr_fun hg (f x)
simp only [hf.extend_apply] at H
exact H
lemma FactorsThrough.extend_comp {g : α → γ} (e' : β → γ) (hf : FactorsThrough g f) :
extend f g e' ∘ f = g :=
funext fun a => hf.extend_apply e' a
@[simp]
lemma extend_const (f : α → β) (c : γ) : extend f (fun _ ↦ c) (fun _ ↦ c) = fun _ ↦ c :=
funext fun _ ↦ open scoped Classical in ite_id _
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) : extend f g e' ∘ f = g :=
funext fun a ↦ hf.extend_apply g e' a
theorem Injective.surjective_comp_right' (hf : Injective f) (g₀ : β → γ) :
Surjective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun g ↦ ⟨extend f g g₀, extend_comp hf _ _⟩
theorem Injective.surjective_comp_right [Nonempty γ] (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
hf.surjective_comp_right' fun _ ↦ Classical.choice ‹_›
theorem surjective_comp_right_iff_injective {γ : Type*} [Nontrivial γ] :
Surjective (fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f := by
classical
refine ⟨not_imp_not.mp fun not_inj surj ↦ not_subsingleton γ ⟨fun c c' ↦ ?_⟩,
(·.surjective_comp_right)⟩
simp only [Injective, not_forall] at not_inj
have ⟨a₁, a₂, eq, ne⟩ := not_inj
have ⟨f, hf⟩ := surj (if · = a₂ then c else c')
have h₁ := congr_fun hf a₁
have h₂ := congr_fun hf a₂
simp only [comp_apply, if_neg ne, reduceIte] at h₁ h₂
rw [← h₁, eq, h₂]
theorem Bijective.comp_right (hf : Bijective f) : Bijective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
⟨hf.surjective.injective_comp_right, fun g ↦
⟨g ∘ surjInv hf.surjective,
by simp only [comp_assoc g _ f, (leftInverse_surjInv hf).comp_eq_id, comp_id]⟩⟩
end Extend
namespace FactorsThrough
protected theorem rfl {α β : Sort*} {f : α → β} : FactorsThrough f f := fun _ _ ↦ id
theorem comp_left {α β γ δ : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : FactorsThrough g f) (g' : γ → δ) :
FactorsThrough (g' ∘ g) f := fun _x _y hxy ↦
congr_arg g' (h hxy)
theorem comp_right {α β γ δ : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : FactorsThrough g f) (g' : δ → α) :
FactorsThrough (g ∘ g') (f ∘ g') := fun _x _y hxy ↦
h hxy
end FactorsThrough
theorem uncurry_def {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : uncurry f = fun p ↦ f p.1 p.2 :=
rfl
section Bicomp
variable {α β γ δ ε : Type*}
/-- Compose a binary function `f` with a pair of unary functions `g` and `h`.
If both arguments of `f` have the same type and `g = h`, then `bicompl f g g = f on g`. -/
def bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (a b) :=
f (g a) (h b)
/-- Compose a unary function `f` with a binary function `g`. -/
def bicompr (f : γ → δ) (g : α → β → γ) (a b) :=
f (g a b)
-- Suggested local notation:
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => bicompr f g
theorem uncurry_bicompr (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) : uncurry (g ∘₂ f) = g ∘ uncurry f :=
rfl
theorem uncurry_bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) :
uncurry (bicompl f g h) = uncurry f ∘ Prod.map g h :=
rfl
end Bicomp
section Uncurry
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- Records a way to turn an element of `α` into a function from `β` to `γ`. The most generic use
is to recursively uncurry. For instance `f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into
`↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances for bundled maps. -/
class HasUncurry (α : Type*) (β : outParam Type*) (γ : outParam Type*) where
/-- Uncurrying operator. The most generic use is to recursively uncurry. For instance
`f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into `↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances
for bundled maps. -/
uncurry : α → β → γ
@[inherit_doc] notation:arg "↿" x:arg => HasUncurry.uncurry x
instance hasUncurryBase : HasUncurry (α → β) α β :=
⟨id⟩
instance hasUncurryInduction [HasUncurry β γ δ] : HasUncurry (α → β) (α × γ) δ :=
⟨fun f p ↦ (↿(f p.1)) p.2⟩
end Uncurry
/-- A function is involutive, if `f ∘ f = id`. -/
def Involutive {α} (f : α → α) : Prop :=
∀ x, f (f x) = x
theorem _root_.Bool.involutive_not : Involutive not :=
Bool.not_not
namespace Involutive
variable {α : Sort u} {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f)
include h
@[simp]
theorem comp_self : f ∘ f = id :=
funext h
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse f f := h
theorem leftInverse_iff {g : α → α} :
g.LeftInverse f ↔ g = f :=
⟨fun hg ↦ funext fun x ↦ by rw [← h x, hg, h], fun he ↦ he ▸ h.leftInverse⟩
protected theorem rightInverse : RightInverse f f := h
protected theorem injective : Injective f := h.leftInverse.injective
protected theorem surjective : Surjective f := fun x ↦ ⟨f x, h x⟩
protected theorem bijective : Bijective f := ⟨h.injective, h.surjective⟩
/-- Involuting an `ite` of an involuted value `x : α` negates the `Prop` condition in the `ite`. -/
protected theorem ite_not (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x : α) :
f (ite P x (f x)) = ite (¬P) x (f x) := by rw [apply_ite f, h, ite_not]
/-- An involution commutes across an equality. Compare to `Function.Injective.eq_iff`. -/
protected theorem eq_iff {x y : α} : f x = y ↔ x = f y :=
h.injective.eq_iff' (h y)
end Involutive
lemma not_involutive : Involutive Not := fun _ ↦ propext not_not
lemma not_injective : Injective Not := not_involutive.injective
lemma not_surjective : Surjective Not := not_involutive.surjective
lemma not_bijective : Bijective Not := not_involutive.bijective
@[simp]
lemma symmetric_apply_eq_iff {α : Sort*} {f : α → α} : Symmetric (f · = ·) ↔ Involutive f := by
simp [Symmetric, Involutive]
/-- The property of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` being injective.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the corresponding function `α × β → γ` being injective.
-/
def Injective2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄, f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ → a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂
namespace Injective2
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β → γ}
/-- A binary injective function is injective when only the left argument varies. -/
protected theorem left (hf : Injective2 f) (b : β) : Function.Injective fun a ↦ f a b :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (hf h).left
/-- A binary injective function is injective when only the right argument varies. -/
protected theorem right (hf : Injective2 f) (a : α) : Function.Injective (f a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (hf h).right
protected theorem uncurry {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β → γ} (hf : Injective2 f) :
Function.Injective (uncurry f) :=
fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h ↦ (hf h).elim (congr_arg₂ _)
/-- As a map from the left argument to a unary function, `f` is injective. -/
theorem left' (hf : Injective2 f) [Nonempty β] : Function.Injective f := fun _ _ h ↦
let ⟨b⟩ := ‹Nonempty β›
hf.left b <| (congr_fun h b :)
/-- As a map from the right argument to a unary function, `f` is injective. -/
theorem right' (hf : Injective2 f) [Nonempty α] : Function.Injective fun b a ↦ f a b :=
fun _ _ h ↦
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
hf.right a <| (congr_fun h a :)
theorem eq_iff (hf : Injective2 f) {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ hf h, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ congr_arg₂ f h1 h2⟩
end Injective2
section Sometimes
/-- `sometimes f` evaluates to some value of `f`, if it exists. This function is especially
interesting in the case where `α` is a proposition, in which case `f` is necessarily a
constant function, so that `sometimes f = f a` for all `a`. -/
noncomputable def sometimes {α β} [Nonempty β] (f : α → β) : β :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : Nonempty α then f (Classical.choice h) else Classical.choice ‹_›
theorem sometimes_eq {p : Prop} {α} [Nonempty α] (f : p → α) (a : p) : sometimes f = f a :=
dif_pos ⟨a⟩
theorem sometimes_spec {p : Prop} {α} [Nonempty α] (P : α → Prop) (f : p → α) (a : p)
(h : P (f a)) : P (sometimes f) := by
rwa [sometimes_eq]
end Sometimes
end Function
variable {α β : Sort*}
/-- A relation `r : α → β → Prop` is "function-like"
(for each `a` there exists a unique `b` such that `r a b`)
if and only if it is `(f · = ·)` for some function `f`. -/
lemma forall_existsUnique_iff {r : α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∃! b, r a b) ↔ ∃ f : α → β, ∀ {a b}, r a b ↔ f a = b := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· refine ⟨fun a ↦ (h a).choose, fun hr ↦ ?_, fun h' ↦ h' ▸ ?_⟩
exacts [((h _).choose_spec.2 _ hr).symm, (h _).choose_spec.1]
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
simp [hf]
/-- A relation `r : α → β → Prop` is "function-like"
(for each `a` there exists a unique `b` such that `r a b`)
if and only if it is `(f · = ·)` for some function `f`. -/
lemma forall_existsUnique_iff' {r : α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∃! b, r a b) ↔ ∃ f : α → β, r = (f · = ·) := by
simp [forall_existsUnique_iff, funext_iff]
/-- A symmetric relation `r : α → α → Prop` is "function-like"
(for each `a` there exists a unique `b` such that `r a b`)
if and only if it is `(f · = ·)` for some involutive function `f`. -/
protected lemma Symmetric.forall_existsUnique_iff' {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Symmetric r) :
(∀ a, ∃! b, r a b) ↔ ∃ f : α → α, Involutive f ∧ r = (f · = ·) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨f, _, hf⟩ ↦ forall_existsUnique_iff'.2 ⟨f, hf⟩⟩
rcases forall_existsUnique_iff'.1 h with ⟨f, rfl : r = _⟩
exact ⟨f, symmetric_apply_eq_iff.1 hr, rfl⟩
/-- A symmetric relation `r : α → α → Prop` is "function-like"
(for each `a` there exists a unique `b` such that `r a b`)
if and only if it is `(f · = ·)` for some involutive function `f`. -/
protected lemma Symmetric.forall_existsUnique_iff {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Symmetric r) :
(∀ a, ∃! b, r a b) ↔ ∃ f : α → α, Involutive f ∧ ∀ {a b}, r a b ↔ f a = b := by
simp [hr.forall_existsUnique_iff', funext_iff]
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the set `s`, and to `g` on its complement. -/
def Set.piecewise {α : Type u} {β : α → Sort v} (s : Set α) (f g : ∀ i, β i)
[∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] : ∀ i, β i :=
fun i ↦ if i ∈ s then f i else g i
/-! ### Bijectivity of `Eq.rec`, `Eq.mp`, `Eq.mpr`, and `cast` -/
theorem eq_rec_on_bijective {C : α → Sort*} :
∀ {a a' : α} (h : a = a'), Function.Bijective (@Eq.ndrec _ _ C · _ h)
| _, _, rfl => ⟨fun _ _ ↦ id, fun x ↦ ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_mp_bijective {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : Function.Bijective (Eq.mp h) := by
-- TODO: mathlib3 uses `eq_rec_on_bijective`, difference in elaboration here
-- due to `@[macro_inline]` possibly?
cases h
exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ id, fun x ↦ ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_mpr_bijective {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : Function.Bijective (Eq.mpr h) := by
cases h
exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ id, fun x ↦ ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem cast_bijective {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : Function.Bijective (cast h) := by
cases h
exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ id, fun x ↦ ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
/-! Note these lemmas apply to `Type*` not `Sort*`, as the latter interferes with `simp`, and
is trivial anyway. -/
@[simp]
theorem eq_rec_inj {a a' : α} (h : a = a') {C : α → Type*} (x y : C a) :
(Eq.ndrec x h : C a') = Eq.ndrec y h ↔ x = y :=
(eq_rec_on_bijective h).injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj {α β : Type u} (h : α = β) {x y : α} : cast h x = cast h y ↔ x = y :=
(cast_bijective h).injective.eq_iff
theorem Function.LeftInverse.eq_rec_eq {γ : β → Sort v} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (C : ∀ a : α, γ (f a)) (a : α) :
-- TODO: mathlib3 uses `(congr_arg f (h a)).rec (C (g (f a)))` for LHS
@Eq.rec β (f (g (f a))) (fun x _ ↦ γ x) (C (g (f a))) (f a) (congr_arg f (h a)) = C a :=
eq_of_heq <| (eqRec_heq _ _).trans <| by rw [h]
theorem Function.LeftInverse.eq_rec_on_eq {γ : β → Sort v} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (C : ∀ a : α, γ (f a)) (a : α) :
-- TODO: mathlib3 uses `(congr_arg f (h a)).recOn (C (g (f a)))` for LHS
@Eq.recOn β (f (g (f a))) (fun x _ ↦ γ x) (f a) (congr_arg f (h a)) (C (g (f a))) = C a :=
h.eq_rec_eq _ _
theorem Function.LeftInverse.cast_eq {γ : β → Sort v} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (C : ∀ a : α, γ (f a)) (a : α) :
cast (congr_arg (fun a ↦ γ (f a)) (h a)) (C (g (f a))) = C a := by
rw [cast_eq_iff_heq, h]
/-- A set of functions "separates points"
if for each pair of distinct points there is a function taking different values on them. -/
def Set.SeparatesPoints {α β : Type*} (A : Set (α → β)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ f ∈ A, (f x : β) ≠ f y
theorem InvImage.equivalence {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
(h : Equivalence r) : Equivalence (InvImage r f) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ h.1 _, h.symm, h.trans⟩
instance {α β : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {x : α × β} [Decidable (r x.1 x.2)] :
Decidable (uncurry r x) :=
‹Decidable _›
instance {α β : Type*} {r : α × β → Prop} {a : α} {b : β} [Decidable (r (a, b))] :
Decidable (curry r a b) :=
‹Decidable _›
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Basic.lean | 1,086 | 1,090 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the module `Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs`.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the
definitions file, as well as extra lemmas for functions defined in the definitions file and
`Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations` (empty set, univ, union, intersection, insert, singleton,
set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
theorem setOf_injective : Function.Injective (@setOf α) := injective_id
theorem setOf_inj {p q : α → Prop} : { x | p x } = { x | q x } ↔ p = q := Iff.rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- This lemma is intended for use with `rw` where a membership predicate is needed,
hence the explicit argument and the equality in the reverse direction from normal.
See also `Set.mem_setOf_eq` for the reverse direction applied to an argument. -/
theorem eq_mem_setOf (p : α → Prop) : p = (· ∈ {a | p a}) := rfl
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem not_top_subset : ¬⊤ ⊆ s ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
simp [not_subset]
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
theorem ssubset_iff_exists {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, Set.exists_of_ssubset h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ (Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h1).mpr h2⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty ↥s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
-- Redeclare for refined keys
-- `Nonempty (@Subtype _ (@Membership.mem _ (Set _) _ (@Top.top (Set _) _)))`
instance instNonemptyTop [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (⊤ : Set α) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nonempty (univ : Set α))
theorem Nonempty.of_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty := nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype := Nonempty.of_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (or_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_or _)
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_left_iff : s ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
left_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_right_iff : t ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
right_lt_sup
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_and _)
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_right_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
inf_lt_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_left_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ s ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
inf_lt_left
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and]
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
end Sep
/-- See also `Set.sdiff_inter_right_comm`. -/
lemma inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) := inf_sdiff_assoc ..
/-- See also `Set.inter_diff_assoc`. -/
lemma sdiff_inter_right_comm (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ t := sdiff_inf_right_comm ..
lemma inter_sdiff_left_comm (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = t ∩ (s \ u) := inf_sdiff_left_comm ..
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
/-- A version of `diff_union_diff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel' (hi : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : (s \ t) ∪ (t \ u) = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' hi hu
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s \ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem diff_inter_distrib_right (s t r : Set α) : (t ∩ r) \ s = (t \ s) ∩ (r \ s) :=
inf_sdiff
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma inl_compl_union_inr_compl {α β : Type*} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
Sum.inl '' sᶜ ∪ Sum.inr '' tᶜ = (Sum.inl '' s ∪ Sum.inr '' t)ᶜ := by
rw [compl_union]
aesop
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
theorem diff_nonempty {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
theorem diff_subset_diff_iff_subset {r : Set α} (hs : s ⊆ r) (ht : t ⊆ r) :
r \ s ⊆ r \ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le hs ht
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
theorem diff_inter_diff : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
theorem compl_diff : (t \ s)ᶜ = s ∪ tᶜ :=
Eq.trans compl_sdiff himp_eq
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
theorem inter_diff_right_comm : (s ∩ t) \ u = s \ u ∩ t := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
theorem diff_inter_right_comm : (s \ u) ∩ t = (s ∩ t) \ u := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
/-! ### Powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := @h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := @h
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : Set α) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem powerset_inter (s t : Set α) : 𝒫(s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext fun _ => subset_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => @h _ (fun _ h => h), fun h _ hu _ ha => h (hu ha)⟩
theorem monotone_powerset : Monotone (powerset : Set α → Set (Set α)) := fun _ _ => powerset_mono.2
@[simp]
theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).Nonempty :=
⟨∅, fun _ h => empty_subset s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫(∅ : Set α) = {∅} :=
ext fun _ => subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫(univ : Set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
/-! ### Sets defined as an if-then-else -/
@[deprecated _root_.mem_dite (since := "2025-01-30")]
protected theorem mem_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) (t : ¬ p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h : p, x ∈ s h) ∧ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h :=
_root_.mem_dite
theorem mem_dite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else univ) ↔ ∀ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp [mem_dite]
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t Set.univ ↔ p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_right p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then univ else t h) ↔ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p Set.univ t ↔ ¬p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_left p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else ∅) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, not_not]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1 h.2⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun _ => h₂, h₁⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t ∅ ↔ p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_right p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
theorem mem_dite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then ∅ else t h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2 h.1⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun h => h₁ h, fun _ => h₂⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p ∅ t ↔ ¬p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_left p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
/-! ### If-then-else for sets -/
/-- `ite` for sets: `Set.ite t s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t`, `Set.ite t s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ`.
Defined as `s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t`. -/
protected def ite (t s s' : Set α) : Set α :=
s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t
@[simp]
theorem ite_inter_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t := by
rw [Set.ite, union_inter_distrib_right, diff_inter_self, inter_assoc, inter_self, union_empty]
@[simp]
theorem ite_compl (t s s' : Set α) : tᶜ.ite s s' = t.ite s' s := by
rw [Set.ite, Set.ite, diff_compl, union_comm, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem ite_inter_compl_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ := by
rw [← ite_compl, ite_inter_self]
@[simp]
theorem ite_diff_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' \ t = s' \ t :=
ite_inter_compl_self t s s'
@[simp]
theorem ite_same (t s : Set α) : t.ite s s = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[simp]
theorem ite_left (s t : Set α) : s.ite s t = s ∪ t := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_right (s t : Set α) : s.ite t s = t ∩ s := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty (s s' : Set α) : Set.ite ∅ s s' = s' := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_univ (s s' : Set α) : Set.ite univ s s' = s := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty_left (t s : Set α) : t.ite ∅ s = s \ t := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty_right (t s : Set α) : t.ite s ∅ = s ∩ t := by simp [Set.ite]
theorem ite_mono (t : Set α) {s₁ s₁' s₂ s₂' : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h' : s₁' ⊆ s₂') :
t.ite s₁ s₁' ⊆ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_inter_left _ h) (inter_subset_inter_left _ h')
theorem ite_subset_union (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
union_subset_union inter_subset_left diff_subset
theorem inter_subset_ite (t s s' : Set α) : s ∩ s' ⊆ t.ite s s' :=
ite_same t (s ∩ s') ▸ ite_mono _ inter_subset_left inter_subset_right
theorem ite_inter_inter (t s₁ s₂ s₁' s₂' : Set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s₂) (s₁' ∩ s₂') = t.ite s₁ s₁' ∩ t.ite s₂ s₂' := by
ext x
simp only [Set.ite, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_union]
tauto
theorem ite_inter (t s₁ s₂ s : Set α) : t.ite (s₁ ∩ s) (s₂ ∩ s) = t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s := by
rw [ite_inter_inter, ite_same]
theorem ite_inter_of_inter_eq (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ s : Set α} (h : s₁ ∩ s = s₂ ∩ s) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s = s₁ ∩ s := by rw [← ite_inter, ← h, ite_same]
theorem subset_ite {t s s' u : Set α} : u ⊆ t.ite s s' ↔ u ∩ t ⊆ s ∧ u \ t ⊆ s' := by
simp only [subset_def, ← forall_and]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite]
theorem ite_eq_of_subset_left (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ \ t) := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite, or_iff_right_of_imp (@h x)]
theorem ite_eq_of_subset_right (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ = (s₁ ∩ t) ∪ s₂ := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite, or_iff_left_of_imp (@h x)]
end Set
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
theorem Injective.nonempty_apply_iff {f : Set α → Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h2 : f ∅ = ∅)
{s : Set α} : (f s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ← h2, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, hf.ne_iff]
end Function
namespace Subsingleton
variable {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α]
theorem eq_univ_of_nonempty {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → s = univ := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
eq_univ_of_forall fun y => Subsingleton.elim x y ▸ hx
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem set_cases {p : Set α → Prop} (h0 : p ∅) (h1 : p univ) (s) : p s :=
(s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim fun h => h.symm ▸ h0) fun h => (eq_univ_of_nonempty h).symm ▸ h1
theorem mem_iff_nonempty {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} {x : α} : x ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun hx => ⟨x, hx⟩, fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => Subsingleton.elim y x ▸ hy⟩
end Subsingleton
/-! ### Decidability instances for sets -/
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} (s t : Set α) (a b : α)
instance decidableSdiff [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s \ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t))
instance decidableInter [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s ∩ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t))
instance decidableUnion [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s ∪ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t))
instance decidableCompl [Decidable (a ∈ s)] : Decidable (a ∈ sᶜ) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∉ s))
instance decidableEmptyset : Decidable (a ∈ (∅ : Set α)) := Decidable.isFalse (by simp)
instance decidableUniv : Decidable (a ∈ univ) := Decidable.isTrue (by simp)
instance decidableInsert [Decidable (a = b)] [Decidable (a ∈ s)] : Decidable (a ∈ insert b s) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∨ _))
instance decidableSetOf (p : α → Prop) [Decidable (p a)] : Decidable (a ∈ { a | p a }) := by
assumption
end Set
variable {α : Type*} {s t u : Set α}
namespace Equiv
/-- Given a predicate `p : α → Prop`, produces an equivalence between
`Set {a : α // p a}` and `{s : Set α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a}`. -/
protected def setSubtypeComm (p : α → Prop) :
Set {a : α // p a} ≃ {s : Set α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a} where
toFun s := ⟨{a | ∃ h : p a, s ⟨a, h⟩}, fun _ h ↦ h.1⟩
invFun s := {a | a.val ∈ s.val}
left_inv s := by ext a; exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.2, fun h ↦ ⟨a.property, h⟩⟩
right_inv s := by ext; exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.2, fun h ↦ ⟨s.property _ h, h⟩⟩
@[simp]
protected lemma setSubtypeComm_apply (p : α → Prop) (s : Set {a // p a}) :
(Equiv.setSubtypeComm p) s = ⟨{a | ∃ h : p a, ⟨a, h⟩ ∈ s}, fun _ h ↦ h.1⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected lemma setSubtypeComm_symm_apply (p : α → Prop) (s : {s // ∀ a ∈ s, p a}) :
(Equiv.setSubtypeComm p).symm s = {a | a.val ∈ s.val} :=
rfl
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 2,051 | 2,056 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
| rw [corec_eq]
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 399 | 400 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
/-!
# Ordered monoids
This file provides the definitions of ordered monoids.
-/
open Function
variable {α : Type*}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered (additive) monoid is a monoid with a partial order such that addition is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedAddMonoid (α : Type*) [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] where
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, c + a ≤ c + b
protected add_le_add_right : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, a + c ≤ b + c := fun a b h c ↦ by
rw [add_comm _ c, add_comm _ c]; exact add_le_add_left a b h c
/-- An ordered monoid is a monoid with a partial order such that multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsOrderedMonoid (α : Type*) [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] where
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, c * a ≤ c * b
protected mul_le_mul_right : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, a * c ≤ b * c := fun a b h c ↦ by
rw [mul_comm _ c, mul_comm _ c]; exact mul_le_mul_left a b h c
section IsOrderedMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 900) IsOrderedMonoid.toMulLeftMono : MulLeftMono α where
elim := fun a _ _ bc ↦ IsOrderedMonoid.mul_le_mul_left _ _ bc a
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 900) IsOrderedMonoid.toMulRightMono : MulRightMono α where
elim := fun a _ _ bc ↦ IsOrderedMonoid.mul_le_mul_right _ _ bc a
end IsOrderedMonoid
/-- An ordered cancellative additive monoid is an ordered additive
monoid in which addition is cancellative and monotone. -/
class IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (α : Type*) [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid α where
protected le_of_add_le_add_left : ∀ a b c : α, a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c
protected le_of_add_le_add_right : ∀ a b c : α, b + a ≤ c + a → b ≤ c := fun a b c h ↦ by
rw [add_comm _ a, add_comm _ a] at h; exact le_of_add_le_add_left a b c h
/-- An ordered cancellative monoid is an ordered monoid in which
multiplication is cancellative and monotone. -/
@[to_additive IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
class IsOrderedCancelMonoid (α : Type*) [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] extends
IsOrderedMonoid α where
protected le_of_mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b c : α, a * b ≤ a * c → b ≤ c
protected le_of_mul_le_mul_right : ∀ a b c : α, b * a ≤ c * a → b ≤ c := fun a b c h ↦ by
rw [mul_comm _ a, mul_comm _ a] at h; exact le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c h
section IsOrderedCancelMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedCancelMonoid.toMulLeftReflectLE :
MulLeftReflectLE α :=
⟨IsOrderedCancelMonoid.le_of_mul_le_mul_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 900) IsOrderedCancelMonoid.toMulLeftReflectLT :
MulLeftReflectLT α where
elim := contravariant_lt_of_contravariant_le α α _ ContravariantClass.elim
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOrderedCancelMonoid.toMulRightReflectLT :
MulRightReflectLT α :=
inferInstance
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid.toIsCancelAdd]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedCancelMonoid.toIsCancelMul : IsCancelMul α where
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ h :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.le).antisymm <| le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.ge
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ h :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.le).antisymm <| le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.ge
end IsOrderedCancelMonoid
/-- An ordered (additive) commutative monoid is a commutative monoid with a partial order such that
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends AddCommMonoid α, PartialOrder α where
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative monoid is a commutative monoid with a partial order such that
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends CommMonoid α, PartialOrder α where
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c, c * a ≤ c * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An ordered cancellative additive commutative monoid is a partially ordered commutative additive
monoid in which addition is cancellative and monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedAddCommMonoid α where
protected le_of_add_le_add_left : ∀ a b c : α, a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An ordered cancellative commutative monoid is a partially ordered commutative monoid in which
multiplication is cancellative and monotone. -/
@[to_additive OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid,
deprecated "Use `[CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCancelCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedCommMonoid α where
protected le_of_mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b c : α, a * b ≤ a * c → b ≤ c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative monoid. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedAddCommMonoid α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative monoid. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedCommMonoid α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered cancellative additive commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
with a decidable linear order in which addition is cancellative and monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid α,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered cancellative commutative monoid is a commutative monoid with a linear order
in which multiplication is cancellative and monotone. -/
@[to_additive LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid,
deprecated "Use `[CommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedCancelCommMonoid α,
LinearOrderedCommMonoid α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid.toLinearOrder
LinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid.toLinearOrderedCommMonoid
LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedCommMonoid.toLinearOrder
variable [CommMonoid α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_le_mul_self_iff : 1 ≤ a * a ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
⟨(fun h ↦ by push_neg at h ⊢; exact mul_lt_one' h h).mtr, fun h ↦ one_le_mul h h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_lt_mul_self_iff : 1 < a * a ↔ 1 < a :=
⟨(fun h ↦ by push_neg at h ⊢; exact mul_le_one' h h).mtr, fun h ↦ one_lt_mul'' h h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_self_le_one_iff : a * a ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
| @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Defs.lean | 179 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
|
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 612 | 614 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Justin Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Justin Thomas
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.AEval
/-!
# Annihilating Ideal
Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`
Every element `a : A` defines
an ideal `Polynomial.annIdeal a ⊆ R[X]`.
Simply put, this is the set of polynomials `p` where
the polynomial evaluation `p(a)` is 0.
## Special case where the ground ring is a field
In the special case that `R` is a field, we use the notation `R = 𝕜`.
Here `𝕜[X]` is a PID, so there is a polynomial `g ∈ Polynomial.annIdeal a`
which generates the ideal. We show that if this generator is
chosen to be monic, then it is the minimal polynomial of `a`,
as defined in `FieldTheory.Minpoly`.
## Special case: endomorphism algebra
Given an `R`-module `M` (`[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]`)
there are some common specializations which may be more familiar.
* Example 1: `A = M →ₗ[R] M`, the endomorphism algebra of an `R`-module M.
* Example 2: `A = n × n` matrices with entries in `R`.
-/
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (R) in
/-- `annIdeal R a` is the *annihilating ideal* of all `p : R[X]` such that `p(a) = 0`.
The informal notation `p(a)` stand for `Polynomial.aeval a p`.
Again informally, the annihilating ideal of `a` is
`{ p ∈ R[X] | p(a) = 0 }`. This is an ideal in `R[X]`.
The formal definition uses the kernel of the aeval map. -/
noncomputable def annIdeal (a : A) : Ideal R[X] :=
RingHom.ker ((aeval a).toRingHom : R[X] →+* A)
/-- It is useful to refer to ideal membership sometimes
and the annihilation condition other times. -/
theorem mem_annIdeal_iff_aeval_eq_zero {a : A} {p : R[X]} : p ∈ annIdeal R a ↔ aeval a p = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
end Semiring
section Field
variable {𝕜 A : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [Ring A] [Algebra 𝕜 A]
variable (𝕜)
open Submodule
/-- `annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a` is the monic generator of `annIdeal 𝕜 a`
if one exists, otherwise `0`.
Since `𝕜[X]` is a principal ideal domain there is a polynomial `g` such that
`span 𝕜 {g} = annIdeal a`. This picks some generator.
We prefer the monic generator of the ideal. -/
noncomputable def annIdealGenerator (a : A) : 𝕜[X] :=
let g := IsPrincipal.generator <| annIdeal 𝕜 a
g * C g.leadingCoeff⁻¹
section
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem annIdealGenerator_eq_zero_iff {a : A} : annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a = 0 ↔ annIdeal 𝕜 a = ⊥ := by
simp only [annIdealGenerator, mul_eq_zero, IsPrincipal.eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero,
Polynomial.C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero, or_self_iff]
end
/-- `annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a` is indeed a generator. -/
@[simp]
theorem span_singleton_annIdealGenerator (a : A) :
Ideal.span {annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a} = annIdeal 𝕜 a := by
by_cases h : annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a = 0
· rw [h, annIdealGenerator_eq_zero_iff.mp h, Set.singleton_zero, Ideal.span_zero]
· rw [annIdealGenerator, Ideal.span_singleton_mul_right_unit, Ideal.span_singleton_generator]
apply Polynomial.isUnit_C.mpr
apply IsUnit.mk0
apply inv_eq_zero.not.mpr
apply Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.not.mpr
apply (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp h).1
/-- The annihilating ideal generator is a member of the annihilating ideal. -/
theorem annIdealGenerator_mem (a : A) : annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a ∈ annIdeal 𝕜 a :=
Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ (Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_mem _)
theorem mem_iff_eq_smul_annIdealGenerator {p : 𝕜[X]} (a : A) :
p ∈ annIdeal 𝕜 a ↔ ∃ s : 𝕜[X], p = s • annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a := by
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ p, ← mem_span_singleton, ← span_singleton_annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a, Ideal.span]
/-- The generator we chose for the annihilating ideal is monic when the ideal is non-zero. -/
theorem monic_annIdealGenerator (a : A) (hg : annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a ≠ 0) :
Monic (annIdealGenerator 𝕜 a) :=
monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hg).1
/-! We are working toward showing the generator of the annihilating ideal
| in the field case is the minimal polynomial. We are going to use a uniqueness
theorem of the minimal polynomial.
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AnnihilatingPolynomial.lean | 116 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,727 | 1,730 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Tangent cone
In this file, we define two predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x` and `UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s`
ensuring that, if a function has two derivatives, then they have to coincide. As a direct
definition of this fact (quantifying on all target types and all functions) would depend on
universes, we use a more intrinsic definition: if all the possible tangent directions to the set
`s` at the point `x` span a dense subset of the whole subset, it is easy to check that the
derivative has to be unique.
Therefore, we introduce the set of all tangent directions, named `tangentConeAt`,
and express `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` in terms of it.
One should however think of this definition as an implementation detail: the only reason to
introduce the predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` is to ensure the uniqueness
of the derivative. This is why their names reflect their uses, and not how they are defined.
## Implementation details
Note that this file is imported by `Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. Hence, derivatives are
not defined yet. The property of uniqueness of the derivative is therefore proved in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`, but based on the properties of the tangent cone we prove
here.
-/
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
open Filter Set Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise
section TangentCone
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- The set of all tangent directions to the set `s` at the point `x`. -/
def tangentConeAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Set E :=
{ y : E | ∃ (c : ℕ → 𝕜) (d : ℕ → E),
(∀ᶠ n in atTop, x + d n ∈ s) ∧
Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) atTop atTop ∧
Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) atTop (𝓝 y) }
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at `x` spans a dense subset of the whole space.
The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential within `s` at `x` is unique,
hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`.
To avoid pathologies in dimension 0, we also require that `x` belongs to the closure of `s` (which
is automatic when `E` is not `0`-dimensional). -/
@[mk_iff]
structure UniqueDiffWithinAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop where
dense_tangentConeAt : Dense (Submodule.span 𝕜 (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) : Set E)
mem_closure : x ∈ closure s
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentCone := UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentConeAt
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at any of its points spans a dense subset of
the whole space. The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential along `s` is
unique, hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffOn.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. -/
def UniqueDiffOn (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
end TangentCone
variable {𝕜}
variable {E F G : Type*}
section TangentCone
-- This section is devoted to the properties of the tangent cone.
open NormedField
section TVS
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
theorem mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul {r : 𝕜} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr : ‖r‖ < 1)
(hs : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + r ^ n • y ∈ s) : y ∈ tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
refine ⟨fun n ↦ (r ^ n)⁻¹, fun n ↦ r ^ n • y, hs, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [norm_inv, norm_pow, ← inv_pow]
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt <| (one_lt_inv₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hr₀)).2 hr
· simp only [inv_smul_smul₀ (pow_ne_zero _ hr₀), tendsto_const_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem tangentConeAt_univ : tangentConeAt 𝕜 univ x = univ :=
let ⟨_r, hr₀, hr⟩ := exists_norm_lt_one 𝕜
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul (norm_pos_iff.1 hr₀) hr <|
Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_univ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_univ := tangentConeAt_univ
@[gcongr]
theorem tangentConeAt_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ⊆ tangentConeAt 𝕜 t x := by
rintro y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩
exact ⟨c, d, mem_of_superset ds fun n hn => h hn, ctop, clim⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_mono := tangentConeAt_mono
end TVS
section Normed
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
@[simp]
theorem tangentConeAt_closure : tangentConeAt 𝕜 (closure s) x = tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (tangentConeAt_mono subset_closure)
rintro y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩
obtain ⟨u, -, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∃ d', x + d' ∈ s ∧ dist (c n • d n) (c n • d') < u n := by
filter_upwards [ctop.eventually_gt_atTop 0, ds] with n hn hns
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.mp hns (u n / ‖c n‖) (div_pos (u_pos n) hn) with ⟨y, hys, hy⟩
refine ⟨y - x, by simpa, ?_⟩
rwa [dist_smul₀, ← dist_add_left x, add_sub_cancel, ← lt_div_iff₀' hn]
simp only [Filter.skolem, eventually_and] at this
rcases this with ⟨d', hd's, hd'⟩
exact ⟨c, d', hd's, ctop, clim.congr_dist
(squeeze_zero' (.of_forall fun _ ↦ dist_nonneg) (hd'.mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt) u_lim)⟩
/-- Auxiliary lemma ensuring that, under the assumptions defining the tangent cone,
the sequence `d` tends to 0 at infinity. -/
theorem tangentConeAt.lim_zero {α : Type*} (l : Filter α) {c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (hd : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto d l (𝓝 0) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖⁻¹) l (𝓝 0) := tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp hc
have B : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n • d n‖) l (𝓝 ‖y‖) := (continuous_norm.tendsto _).comp hd
have C : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖⁻¹ * ‖c n • d n‖) l (𝓝 (0 * ‖y‖)) := A.mul B
rw [zero_mul] at C
have : ∀ᶠ n in l, ‖c n‖⁻¹ * ‖c n • d n‖ = ‖d n‖ := by
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc 0).mono fun n hn => ?_
rw [norm_smul, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀, one_mul]
rwa [Ne, norm_eq_zero]
have D : Tendsto (fun n => ‖d n‖) l (𝓝 0) := Tendsto.congr' this C
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
exact D
theorem tangentConeAt_mono_nhds (h : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) :
tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ⊆ tangentConeAt 𝕜 t x := by
rintro y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩
refine ⟨c, d, ?_, ctop, clim⟩
suffices Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) atTop (𝓝[t] x) from
tendsto_principal.1 (tendsto_inf.1 this).2
refine (tendsto_inf.2 ⟨?_, tendsto_principal.2 ds⟩).mono_right h
simpa only [add_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero atTop ctop clim)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_mono_nhds := tangentConeAt_mono_nhds
/-- Tangent cone of `s` at `x` depends only on `𝓝[s] x`. -/
theorem tangentConeAt_congr (h : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x = tangentConeAt 𝕜 t x :=
Subset.antisymm (tangentConeAt_mono_nhds h.le) (tangentConeAt_mono_nhds h.ge)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_congr := tangentConeAt_congr
/-- Intersecting with a neighborhood of the point does not change the tangent cone. -/
theorem tangentConeAt_inter_nhds (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) : tangentConeAt 𝕜 (s ∩ t) x = tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x :=
tangentConeAt_congr (nhdsWithin_restrict' _ ht).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_inter_nhds := tangentConeAt_inter_nhds
/-- The tangent cone of a product contains the tangent cone of its left factor. -/
theorem subset_tangentConeAt_prod_left {t : Set F} {y : F} (ht : y ∈ closure t) :
LinearMap.inl 𝕜 E F '' tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ⊆ tangentConeAt 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
rintro _ ⟨v, ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hy⟩, rfl⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ d', y + d' ∈ t ∧ ‖c n • d'‖ < ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n := by
intro n
rcases mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 ht _
(eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c n) y (pow_pos one_half_pos n)) with
⟨z, hz, hzt⟩
exact ⟨z - y, by simpa using hzt, by simpa using hz⟩
choose d' hd' using this
refine ⟨c, fun n => (d n, d' n), ?_, hc, ?_⟩
· show ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (x, y) + (d n, d' n) ∈ s ×ˢ t
filter_upwards [hd] with n hn
simp [hn, (hd' n).1]
· apply Tendsto.prodMk_nhds hy _
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => (hd' n).2.le) ?_
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one one_half_pos.le one_half_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias subset_tangentCone_prod_left := subset_tangentConeAt_prod_left
/-- The tangent cone of a product contains the tangent cone of its right factor. -/
theorem subset_tangentConeAt_prod_right {t : Set F} {y : F} (hs : x ∈ closure s) :
LinearMap.inr 𝕜 E F '' tangentConeAt 𝕜 t y ⊆ tangentConeAt 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
rintro _ ⟨w, ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hy⟩, rfl⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ d', x + d' ∈ s ∧ ‖c n • d'‖ < ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n := by
intro n
rcases mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 hs _
(eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c n) x (pow_pos one_half_pos n)) with
⟨z, hz, hzs⟩
exact ⟨z - x, by simpa using hzs, by simpa using hz⟩
choose d' hd' using this
refine ⟨c, fun n => (d' n, d n), ?_, hc, ?_⟩
· show ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (x, y) + (d' n, d n) ∈ s ×ˢ t
filter_upwards [hd] with n hn
simp [hn, (hd' n).1]
· apply Tendsto.prodMk_nhds _ hy
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => (hd' n).2.le) ?_
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one one_half_pos.le one_half_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias subset_tangentCone_prod_right := subset_tangentConeAt_prod_right
/-- The tangent cone of a product contains the tangent cone of each factor. -/
theorem mapsTo_tangentConeAt_pi {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {E : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (E i)} {x : ∀ i, E i}
{i : ι} (hi : ∀ j ≠ i, x j ∈ closure (s j)) :
MapsTo (LinearMap.single 𝕜 E i) (tangentConeAt 𝕜 (s i) (x i))
(tangentConeAt 𝕜 (Set.pi univ s) x) := by
rintro w ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hy⟩
have : ∀ n, ∀ j ≠ i, ∃ d', x j + d' ∈ s j ∧ ‖c n • d'‖ < (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n := fun n j hj ↦ by
rcases mem_closure_iff_nhds.1 (hi j hj) _
(eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c n) (x j) (pow_pos one_half_pos n)) with
⟨z, hz, hzs⟩
exact ⟨z - x j, by simpa using hzs, by simpa using hz⟩
choose! d' hd's hcd' using this
refine ⟨c, fun n => Function.update (d' n) i (d n), hd.mono fun n hn j _ => ?_, hc,
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => ?_⟩
· rcases em (j = i) with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*]
· rcases em (j = i) with (rfl | hj)
· simp [hy]
· suffices Tendsto (fun n => c n • d' n j) atTop (𝓝 0) by simpa [hj]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => (hcd' n j hj).le) ?_
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one one_half_pos.le one_half_lt_one
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias mapsTo_tangentCone_pi := mapsTo_tangentConeAt_pi
/-- If a subset of a real vector space contains an open segment, then the direction of this
segment belongs to the tangent cone at its endpoints. -/
theorem mem_tangentConeAt_of_openSegment_subset {s : Set G} {x y : G} (h : openSegment ℝ x y ⊆ s) :
y - x ∈ tangentConeAt ℝ s x := by
refine mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul one_half_pos.ne' (by norm_num) ?_
refine (eventually_ne_atTop 0).mono fun n hn ↦ (h ?_)
rw [openSegment_eq_image]
refine ⟨(1 / 2) ^ n, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact pow_pos one_half_pos _
· exact pow_lt_one₀ one_half_pos.le one_half_lt_one hn
· simp only [sub_smul, one_smul, smul_sub]; abel
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mem_tangentCone_of_openSegment_subset := mem_tangentConeAt_of_openSegment_subset
/-- If a subset of a real vector space contains a segment, then the direction of this
segment belongs to the tangent cone at its endpoints. -/
theorem mem_tangentConeAt_of_segment_subset {s : Set G} {x y : G} (h : segment ℝ x y ⊆ s) :
y - x ∈ tangentConeAt ℝ s x :=
mem_tangentConeAt_of_openSegment_subset ((openSegment_subset_segment ℝ x y).trans h)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mem_tangentCone_of_segment_subset := mem_tangentConeAt_of_segment_subset
/-- The tangent cone at a non-isolated point contains `0`. -/
theorem zero_mem_tangentCone {s : Set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ closure s) :
0 ∈ tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
/- Take a sequence `d n` tending to `0` such that `x + d n ∈ s`. Taking `c n` of the order
of `1 / (d n) ^ (1/2)`, then `c n` tends to infinity, but `c n • d n` tends to `0`. By definition,
this shows that `0` belongs to the tangent cone. -/
obtain ⟨u, -, hu, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < u n ∧ u n < 1) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' one_pos
choose u_pos u_lt_one using hu
choose v hvs hvu using fun n ↦ Metric.mem_closure_iff.mp hx _ (mul_pos (u_pos n) (u_pos n))
let d n := v n - x
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜
have A n := exists_nat_pow_near (one_le_inv_iff₀.mpr ⟨u_pos n, (u_lt_one n).le⟩) hr
choose m hm_le hlt_m using A
set c := fun n ↦ r ^ (m n + 1)
have c_lim : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ‖c n‖) atTop atTop := by
simp only [c, norm_pow]
refine tendsto_atTop_mono (fun n ↦ (hlt_m n).le) <| .inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero ?_
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff.mpr ⟨u_lim, .of_forall u_pos⟩
refine ⟨c, d, .of_forall <| by simpa [d], c_lim, ?_⟩
have Hle n : ‖c n • d n‖ ≤ ‖r‖ * u n := by
specialize u_pos n
calc
‖c n • d n‖ ≤ (u n)⁻¹ * ‖r‖ * (u n * u n) := by
simp only [c, norm_smul, norm_pow, pow_succ, norm_mul, d, ← dist_eq_norm']
gcongr
exacts [hm_le n, (hvu n).le]
_ = ‖r‖ * u n := by field_simp [mul_assoc]
refine squeeze_zero_norm Hle ?_
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul u_lim
/-- If `x` is not an accumulation point of `s, then the tangent cone of `s` at `x`
is a subset of `{0}`. -/
theorem tangentConeAt_subset_zero (hx : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ⊆ 0 := by
rintro y ⟨c, d, hds, hc, hcd⟩
suffices ∀ᶠ n in .atTop, d n = 0 from
tendsto_nhds_unique hcd <| tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| this.mono fun n hn ↦ by simp [hn]
simp only [accPt_iff_frequently, not_frequently, not_and', ne_eq, not_not] at hx
have : Tendsto (x + d ·) atTop (𝓝 x) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero _ hc hcd)
filter_upwards [this.eventually hx, hds] with n h₁ h₂
simpa using h₁ h₂
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.accPt [Nontrivial E] (h : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : AccPt x (𝓟 s) := by
by_contra! h'
have : Dense (Submodule.span 𝕜 (0 : Set E) : Set E) :=
h.1.mono <| by gcongr; exact tangentConeAt_subset_zero h'
simp [dense_iff_closure_eq] at this
/-- In a proper space, the tangent cone at a non-isolated point is nontrivial. -/
theorem tangentConeAt_nonempty_of_properSpace [ProperSpace E]
{s : Set E} {x : E} (hx : AccPt x (𝓟 s)) :
(tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x ∩ {0}ᶜ).Nonempty := by
/- Take a sequence `d n` tending to `0` such that `x + d n ∈ s`. Taking `c n` of the order
of `1 / d n`. Then `c n • d n` belongs to a fixed annulus. By compactness, one can extract
a subsequence converging to a limit `l`. Then `l` is nonzero, and by definition it belongs to
the tangent cone. -/
obtain ⟨u, -, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have A n : ∃ y ∈ closedBall x (u n) ∩ s, y ≠ x :=
(accPt_iff_nhds).mp hx _ (closedBall_mem_nhds _ (u_pos n))
choose v hv hvx using A
choose hvu hvs using hv
let d := fun n ↦ v n - x
have M n : x + d n ∈ s \ {x} := by simp [d, hvs, hvx]
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜
have W n := rescale_to_shell hr zero_lt_one (x := d n) (by simpa using (M n).2)
choose c c_ne c_le le_c hc using W
have c_lim : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ‖c n‖) atTop atTop := by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ‖c n‖⁻¹ ⁻¹ ) atTop atTop by simpa
apply tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_zero.comp
simp only [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi, norm_pos_iff, ne_eq,
eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le]
have B (n : ℕ) : ‖c n‖⁻¹ ≤ 1⁻¹ * ‖r‖ * u n := by
apply (hc n).trans
gcongr
simpa [d, dist_eq_norm] using hvu n
refine ⟨?_, 0, fun n hn ↦ by simpa using c_ne n⟩
apply squeeze_zero (fun n ↦ by positivity) B
simpa using u_lim.const_mul _
obtain ⟨l, l_mem, φ, φ_strict, hφ⟩ :
∃ l ∈ Metric.closedBall (0 : E) 1 \ Metric.ball (0 : E) (1 / ‖r‖),
∃ (φ : ℕ → ℕ), StrictMono φ ∧ Tendsto ((fun n ↦ c n • d n) ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 l) := by
apply IsCompact.tendsto_subseq _ (fun n ↦ ?_)
· exact (isCompact_closedBall 0 1).diff Metric.isOpen_ball
simp only [mem_diff, Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right, (c_le n).le,
Metric.mem_ball, not_lt, true_and, le_c n]
refine ⟨l, ?_, ?_⟩; swap
· simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
contrapose! l_mem
simp only [one_div, l_mem, mem_diff, Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_self, zero_le_one,
Metric.mem_ball, inv_pos, norm_pos_iff, ne_eq, not_not, true_and]
contrapose! hr
simp [hr]
refine ⟨c ∘ φ, d ∘ φ, .of_forall fun n ↦ ?_, ?_, hφ⟩
· simpa [d] using hvs (φ n)
· exact c_lim.comp φ_strict.tendsto_atTop
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias tangentCone_nonempty_of_properSpace := tangentConeAt_nonempty_of_properSpace
/-- The tangent cone at a non-isolated point in dimension 1 is the whole space. -/
theorem tangentConeAt_eq_univ {s : Set 𝕜} {x : 𝕜} (hx : AccPt x (𝓟 s)) :
tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x = univ := by
apply eq_univ_iff_forall.2 (fun y ↦ ?_)
-- first deal with the case of `0`, which has to be handled separately.
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy
· exact zero_mem_tangentCone (mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.mpr hx.clusterPt)
/- Assume now `y` is a fixed nonzero scalar. Take a sequence `d n` tending to `0` such
that `x + d n ∈ s`. Let `c n = y / d n`. Then `‖c n‖` tends to infinity, and `c n • d n`
converges to `y` (as it is equal to `y`). By definition, this shows that `y` belongs to the
tangent cone. -/
obtain ⟨u, -, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have A n : ∃ y ∈ closedBall x (u n) ∩ s, y ≠ x :=
accPt_iff_nhds.mp hx _ (closedBall_mem_nhds _ (u_pos n))
choose v hv hvx using A
choose hvu hvs using hv
let d := fun n ↦ v n - x
have d_ne n : d n ≠ 0 := by simpa [d, sub_eq_zero] using hvx n
refine ⟨fun n ↦ y * (d n)⁻¹, d, .of_forall ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa [d] using hvs
· simp only [norm_mul, norm_inv]
apply (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos (by simpa using hy)).2
apply tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_zero.comp
simp only [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi, norm_pos_iff, ne_eq,
eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le]
have B (n : ℕ) : ‖d n‖ ≤ u n := by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using hvu n
refine ⟨?_, 0, fun n hn ↦ by simpa using d_ne n⟩
exact squeeze_zero (fun n ↦ by positivity) B u_lim
· convert tendsto_const_nhds (α := ℕ) (x := y) with n
simp [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ (d_ne n)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_eq_univ := tangentConeAt_eq_univ
end Normed
end TangentCone
section UniqueDiff
/-!
### Properties of `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn`
This section is devoted to properties of the predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn`. -/
section TVS
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
theorem UniqueDiffOn.uniqueDiffWithinAt {s : Set E} {x} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h : x ∈ s) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x :=
hs x h
theorem uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 univ x := by
rw [uniqueDiffWithinAt_iff, tangentConeAt_univ]
simp
theorem uniqueDiffOn_univ : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (univ : Set E) :=
fun _ _ => uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
theorem uniqueDiffOn_empty : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) :=
fun _ hx => hx.elim
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.congr_pt (h : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : x = y) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s y := hy ▸ h
end TVS
section Normed
| variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/TangentCone.lean | 439 | 440 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
/-!
# Dilations
We define dilations, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that satisfy
`edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y` for some `r ∉ {0, ∞}`.
The value `r = 0` is not allowed because we want dilations of (e)metric spaces to be automatically
injective. The value `r = ∞` is not allowed because this way we can define `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`,
not `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0∞`. Also, we do not often need maps sending distinct points to points at
infinite distance.
## Main definitions
* `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`: the value of `r` in the relation above, defaulting to 1 in the case
where it is not well-defined.
## Notation
- `α →ᵈ β`: notation for `Dilation α β`.
## Implementation notes
The type of dilations defined in this file are also referred to as "similarities" or "similitudes"
by other authors. The name `Dilation` was chosen to match the Wikipedia name.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoEMetricSpace` and we specialize to `PseudoMetricSpace` and `MetricSpace` when
needed.
## TODO
- Introduce dilation equivs.
- Refactor the `Isometry` API to match the `*HomClass` API below.
## References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilation_(metric_space)
- [Marcel Berger, *Geometry*][berger1987]
-/
noncomputable section
open Bornology Function Set Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
section Defs
variable (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
/-- A dilation is a map that uniformly scales the edistance between any two points. -/
structure Dilation where
toFun : α → β
edist_eq' : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (toFun x) (toFun y) = r * edist x y
@[inherit_doc] infixl:25 " →ᵈ " => Dilation
/-- `DilationClass F α β r` states that `F` is a type of `r`-dilations.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `Dilation`. -/
class DilationClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] : Prop where
edist_eq' : ∀ f : F, ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y
end Defs
namespace Dilation
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {F : Type*}
section Setup
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
instance funLike : FunLike (α →ᵈ β) α β where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance toDilationClass : DilationClass (α →ᵈ β) α β where
edist_eq' f := edist_eq' f
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : α →ᵈ β} : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (h) : ⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
protected theorem congr_arg (f : α →ᵈ β) {x y : α} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : α →ᵈ β) (h) : Dilation.mk f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Copy of a `Dilation` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
protected def copy (f : α →ᵈ β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = ⇑f) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f'
edist_eq' := h.symm ▸ f.edist_eq'
theorem copy_eq_self (f : α →ᵈ β) {f' : α → β} (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable [FunLike F α β]
open Classical in
/-- The ratio of a dilation `f`. If the ratio is undefined (i.e., the distance between any two
points in `α` is either zero or infinity), then we choose one as the ratio. -/
def ratio [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ℝ≥0 :=
if ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ⊤ then 1 else (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose
theorem ratio_of_trivial [DilationClass F α β] (f : F)
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos h
@[nontriviality]
theorem ratio_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos fun x y ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem ratio_ne_zero [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f ≠ 0 := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs
· exact one_ne_zero
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.1
theorem ratio_pos [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : 0 < ratio f :=
(ratio_ne_zero f).bot_lt
@[simp]
theorem edist_eq [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
edist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * edist x y := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs with key
· rcases DilationClass.edist_eq' f with ⟨r, hne, hr⟩
replace hr := hr x y
rcases key x y with h | h
· simp only [hr, h, mul_zero]
· simp [hr, h, hne]
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.2 x y
@[simp]
theorem nndist_eq {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β]
[DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
nndist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * nndist x y := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ← edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_mul, edist_eq]
@[simp]
theorem dist_eq {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β]
[DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
dist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * dist x y := by
simp only [dist_nndist, nndist_eq, NNReal.coe_mul]
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points with nonzero finite distance.
`dist` and `nndist` versions below -/
theorem ratio_unique [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (h₀ : edist x y ≠ 0)
(htop : edist x y ≠ ⊤) (hr : edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y) : r = ratio f := by
simpa only [hr, ENNReal.mul_left_inj h₀ htop, ENNReal.coe_inj] using edist_eq f x y
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points
with nonzero finite distance; `nndist` version -/
theorem ratio_unique_of_nndist_ne_zero {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (hxy : nndist x y ≠ 0)
(hr : nndist (f x) (f y) = r * nndist x y) : r = ratio f :=
ratio_unique (by rwa [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_ne_zero]) (edist_ne_top x y)
(by rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, hr, ENNReal.coe_mul])
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points
with nonzero finite distance; `dist` version -/
theorem ratio_unique_of_dist_ne_zero {α β} {F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (hxy : dist x y ≠ 0)
(hr : dist (f x) (f y) = r * dist x y) : r = ratio f :=
ratio_unique_of_nndist_ne_zero (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.1 hxy) <|
NNReal.eq <| by rw [coe_nndist, hr, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_nndist]
/-- Alternative `Dilation` constructor when the distance hypothesis is over `nndist` -/
def mkOfNNDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β)
(h : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, nndist (f x) (f y) = r * nndist x y) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f
edist_eq' := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hne, h⟩
refine ⟨r, hne, fun x y => ?_⟩
rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, ← ENNReal.coe_mul, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkOfNNDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) (h) :
⇑(mkOfNNDistEq f h : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe_of_nndist_eq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α →ᵈ β)
(h) : Dilation.mkOfNNDistEq f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Alternative `Dilation` constructor when the distance hypothesis is over `dist` -/
def mkOfDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β)
(h : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, dist (f x) (f y) = r * dist x y) : α →ᵈ β :=
mkOfNNDistEq f <|
h.imp fun r hr =>
⟨hr.1, fun x y => NNReal.eq <| by rw [coe_nndist, hr.2, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_nndist]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkOfDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) (h) :
⇑(mkOfDistEq f h : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe_of_dist_eq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α →ᵈ β) (h) :
Dilation.mkOfDistEq f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
end Setup
section PseudoEmetricDilation
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable [FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β]
variable (f : F)
/-- Every isometry is a dilation of ratio `1`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Isometry.toDilation (f : α → β) (hf : Isometry f) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f
edist_eq' := ⟨1, one_ne_zero, by simpa using hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma _root_.Isometry.toDilation_ratio {f : α → β} {hf : Isometry f} : ratio hf.toDilation = 1 := by
by_cases h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ⊤
· exact ratio_of_trivial hf.toDilation h
· push_neg at h
obtain ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂⟩ := h
exact ratio_unique h₁ h₂ (by simp [hf x y]) |>.symm
theorem lipschitz : LipschitzWith (ratio f) (f : α → β) := fun x y => (edist_eq f x y).le
theorem antilipschitz : AntilipschitzWith (ratio f)⁻¹ (f : α → β) := fun x y => by
have hr : ratio f ≠ 0 := ratio_ne_zero f
exact mod_cast
(ENNReal.mul_le_iff_le_inv (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hr) ENNReal.coe_ne_top).1 (edist_eq f x y).ge
/-- A dilation from an emetric space is injective -/
protected theorem injective {α : Type*} [EMetricSpace α] [FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β]
(f : F) :
Injective f :=
(antilipschitz f).injective
/-- The identity is a dilation -/
protected def id (α) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : α →ᵈ α where
toFun := id
edist_eq' := ⟨1, one_ne_zero, fun x y => by simp only [id, ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]⟩
instance : Inhabited (α →ᵈ α) :=
⟨Dilation.id α⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_id : ⇑(Dilation.id α) = id :=
rfl
theorem ratio_id : ratio (Dilation.id α) = 1 := by
by_cases h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞
· rw [ratio, if_pos h]
| · push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨x, y, hne⟩
refine (ratio_unique hne.1 hne.2 ?_).symm
simp
/-- The composition of dilations is a dilation -/
def comp (g : β →ᵈ γ) (f : α →ᵈ β) : α →ᵈ γ where
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Dilation.lean | 277 | 283 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.UpperLower
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Sequences
/-!
# Upper/lower/order-connected sets in normed groups
The topological closure and interior of an upper/lower/order-connected set is an
upper/lower/order-connected set (with the notable exception of the closure of an order-connected
set).
We also prove lemmas specific to `ℝⁿ`. Those are helpful to prove that order-connected sets in `ℝⁿ`
are measurable.
## TODO
Is there a way to generalise `IsClosed.upperClosure_pi`/`IsClosed.lowerClosure_pi` so that they also
apply to `ℝ`, `ℝ × ℝ`, `EuclideanSpace ι ℝ`? `_pi` has been appended to their names to disambiguate
from the other possible lemmas, but we will want there to be a single set of lemmas for all
situations.
-/
open Bornology Function Metric Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α ι : Type*}
section NormedOrderedGroup
variable [NormedCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {s : Set α}
@[to_additive IsUpperSet.thickening]
protected theorem IsUpperSet.thickening' (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsUpperSet (thickening ε s) := by
| rw [← ball_mul_one]
exact hs.mul_left
@[to_additive IsLowerSet.thickening]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/UpperLower.lean | 42 | 45 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.