Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
/-!
# Range of linear maps
The range `LinearMap.range` of a (semi)linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
More specifically, `LinearMap.range` applies to any `SemilinearMapClass` over a `RingHomSurjective`
ring homomorphism.
Note that this also means that dot notation (i.e. `f.range` for a linear map `f`) does not work.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module, range
-/
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} :
range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
theorem range_eq_top_of_surjective [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (hf : Surjective f) :
range f = ⊤ := range_eq_top.2 hf
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
@[simp] lemma range_domRestrict [Module R M₂] (K : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
range (domRestrict f K) = K.map f := by ext; simp
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_range {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[AddCommGroup M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
LinearMap.range f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.range := rfl
lemma _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : p ≤ LinearMap.range f) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset h
lemma range_restrictScalars [SMul R R₂] [Module R₂ M] [Module R M₂] [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R R₂]
[IsScalarTower R R₂ M₂] (f : M →ₗ[R₂] M₂) :
LinearMap.range (f.restrictScalars R) = (LinearMap.range f).restrictScalars R := rfl
end
/-- The decreasing sequence of submodules consisting of the ranges of the iterates of a linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def iterateRange (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o (Submodule R M)ᵒᵈ where
toFun n := LinearMap.range (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le w
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at h
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
use (f ^ c) m
rw [pow_add, Module.End.mul_apply]
/-- Restrict the codomain of a linear map `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
f.codRestrict (LinearMap.range f) (LinearMap.mem_range_self f)
/-- The range of a linear map is finite if the domain is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype M₂`. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
theorem range_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomSurjective τ₂₁] (p : Submodule R M)
(f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
range (codRestrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype (LinearMap.range f) := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using map_codRestrict _ _ _ _
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf map_le_range (map_comap_le _ _)) <| by
rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q ≤ range f) : map f (comap f q) = q := by rwa [Submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
@[simp]
theorem range_zero [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] : range (0 : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = ⊥ := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_zero _
section
variable [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂]
theorem range_le_bot_iff (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : range f ≤ ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [range_le_iff_comap]; exact ker_eq_top
theorem range_eq_bot {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} : range f = ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [← range_le_bot_iff, le_bot_iff]
theorem range_le_ker_iff {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃} :
range f ≤ ker g ↔ (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ker_eq_top.1 <| eq_top_iff'.2 fun _ => h <| ⟨_, rfl⟩, fun h x hx =>
mem_ker.2 <| Exists.elim hx fun y hy => by rw [← hy, ← comp_apply, h, zero_apply]⟩
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p p'} : comap f p ≤ comap f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨fun H ↦ by rwa [SetLike.le_def, (range_eq_top.1 hf).forall], comap_mono⟩
theorem comap_injective {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) : Injective (comap f) := fun _ _ h =>
le_antisymm ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h)) ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
-- TODO (?): generalize to semilinear maps with `f ∘ₗ g` bijective.
theorem ker_eq_range_of_comp_eq_id {M P} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[AddCommGroup P] [Module R P] {f : M →ₗ[R] P} {g : P →ₗ[R] M} (h : f ∘ₗ g = .id) :
ker f = range (LinearMap.id - g ∘ₗ f) :=
le_antisymm (fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, show x - g (f x) = x by rw [hx, map_zero, sub_zero]⟩) <|
range_le_ker_iff.mpr <| by rw [comp_sub, comp_id, ← comp_assoc, h, id_comp, sub_self]
end
end AddCommMonoid
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring R₂]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
variable {f : F}
open Submodule
theorem range_toAddSubgroup [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubgroup = f.toAddMonoidHom.range :=
rfl
theorem ker_le_iff [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {p : Submodule R M} :
ker f ≤ p ↔ ∃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} ⊆ p := by
constructor
· intro h
use 0
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe]
exact ⟨⟨0, map_zero f⟩, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [SetLike.le_def]
intro z hz
simp only [mem_ker, SetLike.mem_coe] at hz
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe, Set.mem_range] at h₁
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h₁
have hx' : x ∈ p := h₂ hx
have hxz : z + x ∈ p := by
apply h₂
simp [hx, hz]
suffices z + x - x ∈ p by simpa only [this, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact p.sub_mem hxz hx'
end Ring
section Semifield
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem range_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : range (a • f) = range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul f _ a h
theorem range_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) :
range (a • f) = ⨆ _ : a ≠ 0, range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul' f _ a
end Semifield
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable (p : Submodule R M)
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
open LinearMap
@[simp]
theorem map_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : map f ⊤ = range f :=
(range_eq_map f).symm
@[simp]
theorem range_subtype : range p.subtype = p := by simpa using map_comap_subtype p ⊤
theorem map_subtype_le (p' : Submodule R p) : map p.subtype p' ≤ p := by
simpa using (map_le_range : map p.subtype p' ≤ range p.subtype)
/-- Under the canonical linear map from a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`, the image of the
maximal submodule of `p` is just `p`. -/
theorem map_subtype_top : map p.subtype (⊤ : Submodule R p) = p := by simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_eq_top {p p' : Submodule R M} : comap p.subtype p' = ⊤ ↔ p ≤ p' :=
eq_top_iff.trans <| map_le_iff_le_comap.symm.trans <| by rw [map_subtype_top]
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_self : comap p.subtype p = ⊤ :=
comap_subtype_eq_top.2 le_rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_subtype_le_iff {p q r : Submodule R M} :
q.comap p.subtype ≤ r.comap p.subtype ↔ p ⊓ q ≤ p ⊓ r :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using map_mono (f := p.subtype) h,
fun h ↦ by simpa using comap_mono (f := p.subtype) h⟩
theorem range_inclusion (p q : Submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) :
range (inclusion h) = comap q.subtype p := by
rw [← map_top, inclusion, LinearMap.map_codRestrict, map_top, range_subtype]
@[simp]
theorem map_subtype_range_inclusion {p p' : Submodule R M} (h : p ≤ p') :
map p'.subtype (range <| inclusion h) = p := by simp [range_inclusion, map_comap_eq, h]
lemma restrictScalars_map [SMul R R₂] [Module R₂ M] [Module R M₂] [IsScalarTower R R₂ M]
[IsScalarTower R R₂ M₂] (f : M →ₗ[R₂] M₂) (M' : Submodule R₂ M) :
(M'.map f).restrictScalars R = (M'.restrictScalars R).map (f.restrictScalars R) := rfl
/-- If `N ⊆ M` then submodules of `N` are the same as submodules of `M` contained in `N`.
See also `Submodule.mapIic`. -/
def MapSubtype.relIso : Submodule R p ≃o { p' : Submodule R M // p' ≤ p } where
toFun p' := ⟨map p.subtype p', map_subtype_le p _⟩
invFun q := comap p.subtype q
left_inv p' := comap_map_eq_of_injective (by exact Subtype.val_injective) p'
right_inv := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => Subtype.ext_val <| by simp [map_comap_subtype p, inf_of_le_right hq]
map_rel_iff' {p₁ p₂} := Subtype.coe_le_coe.symm.trans <| by
dsimp
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap,
comap_map_eq_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective) p₂]
/-- If `p ⊆ M` is a submodule, the ordering of submodules of `p` is embedded in the ordering of
submodules of `M`. -/
def MapSubtype.orderEmbedding : Submodule R p ↪o Submodule R M :=
(RelIso.toRelEmbedding <| MapSubtype.relIso p).trans <|
Subtype.relEmbedding (X := Submodule R M) (fun p p' ↦ p ≤ p') _
@[simp]
theorem map_subtype_embedding_eq (p' : Submodule R p) :
MapSubtype.orderEmbedding p p' = map p.subtype p' :=
rfl
/-- If `N ⊆ M` then submodules of `N` are the same as submodules of `M` contained in `N`. -/
def mapIic (p : Submodule R M) :
Submodule R p ≃o Set.Iic p :=
Submodule.MapSubtype.relIso p
@[simp] lemma coe_mapIic_apply
(p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R p) :
(p.mapIic q : Submodule R M) = q.map p.subtype :=
rfl
end AddCommMonoid
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
/-- A monomorphism is injective. -/
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_cancel {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂}
(h : ∀ u v : ker f →ₗ[R] M, f.comp u = f.comp v → u = v) : ker f = ⊥ := by
have h₁ : f.comp (0 : ker f →ₗ[R] M) = 0 := comp_zero _
rw [← Submodule.range_subtype (ker f),
← h 0 (ker f).subtype (Eq.trans h₁ (comp_ker_subtype f).symm)]
exact range_zero
theorem range_comp_of_range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃]
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) (hf : range f = ⊤) :
range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = range g := by rw [range_comp, hf, Submodule.map_top]
section Image
/-- If `O` is a submodule of `M`, and `Φ : O →ₗ M'` is a linear map,
then `(ϕ : O →ₗ M').submoduleImage N` is `ϕ(N)` as a submodule of `M'` -/
def submoduleImage {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
(ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M') (N : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M' :=
(N.comap O.subtype).map ϕ
@[simp]
theorem mem_submoduleImage {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
{ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M'} {N : Submodule R M} {x : M'} :
x ∈ ϕ.submoduleImage N ↔ ∃ (y : _) (yO : y ∈ O), y ∈ N ∧ ϕ ⟨y, yO⟩ = x := by
refine Submodule.mem_map.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp_rw [Submodule.mem_comap]
· rintro ⟨⟨y, yO⟩, yN : y ∈ N, h⟩
exact ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨⟨y, yO⟩, yN, h⟩
theorem mem_submoduleImage_of_le {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] {O : Submodule R M}
{ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M'} {N : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) {x : M'} :
x ∈ ϕ.submoduleImage N ↔ ∃ (y : _) (yN : y ∈ N), ϕ ⟨y, hNO yN⟩ = x := by
refine mem_submoduleImage.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yO, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨y, yN, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, yN, h⟩
exact ⟨y, hNO yN, yN, h⟩
theorem submoduleImage_apply_of_le {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
{O : Submodule R M} (ϕ : O →ₗ[R] M') (N : Submodule R M) (hNO : N ≤ O) :
ϕ.submoduleImage N = range (ϕ.comp (Submodule.inclusion hNO)) := by
rw [submoduleImage, range_comp, Submodule.range_inclusion]
end Image
section rangeRestrict
variable [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
@[simp] theorem range_rangeRestrict : range f.rangeRestrict = ⊤ := by simp [f.range_codRestrict _]
theorem surjective_rangeRestrict : Surjective f.rangeRestrict := by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_rangeRestrict]
@[simp] theorem ker_rangeRestrict : ker f.rangeRestrict = ker f := LinearMap.ker_codRestrict _ _ _
@[simp] theorem injective_rangeRestrict_iff : Injective f.rangeRestrict ↔ Injective f :=
Set.injective_codRestrict _
end rangeRestrict
end Semiring
end LinearMap
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 437 | 438 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.NatCast
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Ordered rings and semirings
This file develops the basics of ordered (semi)rings.
Each typeclass here comprises
* an algebraic class (`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`)
* an order class (`PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`)
* assumptions on how both interact ((strict) monotonicity, canonicity)
For short,
* "`+` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of addition"
* "`+` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of addition"
* "`*` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of multiplication by a nonnegative number".
* "`*` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of multiplication by a positive number".
## Typeclasses
* `OrderedSemiring`: Semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect `≤`.
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respects
`<`.
* `OrderedCommSemiring`: Commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect
`≤`.
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+`
and `*` respect `<`.
* `OrderedRing`: Ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `OrderedCommRing`: Commutative ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such that `+`
respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedRing`: Nontrivial ring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*`
respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`: Nontrivial commutative ring with a linear order such that `+` respects
`≤` and `*` respects `<`.
## Hierarchy
The hardest part of proving order lemmas might be to figure out the correct generality and its
corresponding typeclass. Here's an attempt at demystifying it. For each typeclass, we list its
immediate predecessors and what conditions are added to each of them.
* `OrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `≤`
- `Semiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `≤`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommSemiring`
- `OrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `CommSemiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedRing`
- `OrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommRing`
- `OrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `StrictOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommRing` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & nontriviality & `*` respects `<`
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
* `LinearOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
open Function
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered semiring is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R where
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
/-- A strict ordered semiring is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
class IsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the left
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `c * a < c * b`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the right
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `a * c < b * c`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial
lemma IsOrderedRing.of_mul_nonneg [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] (mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b) :
IsOrderedRing R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ hc (sub_nonneg.2 ab)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ (sub_nonneg.2 ab) hc
lemma IsStrictOrderedRing.of_mul_pos [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [Nontrivial R] (mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b) :
IsStrictOrderedRing R where
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ hc (sub_pos.2 ab)
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ (sub_pos.2 ab) hc
section IsOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toPosMulMono : PosMulMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ h x.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toMulPosMono : MulPosMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ h x.2
end IsOrderedRing
/-- Turn an ordered domain into a strict ordered ring. -/
lemma IsOrderedRing.toIsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*)
[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
IsStrictOrderedRing R :=
.of_mul_pos fun _ _ ap bp ↦ (mul_nonneg ap.le bp.le).lt_of_ne' (mul_ne_zero ap.ne' bp.ne')
section IsStrictOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toPosMulStrictMono : PosMulStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toMulPosStrictMono : MulPosStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing R where
__ := ‹IsStrictOrderedRing R›
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toCharZero :
CharZero R where
cast_injective :=
(strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply lt_add_one).injective
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder R :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a + 1, lt_add_of_pos_right _ one_pos⟩⟩
end IsStrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrder
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors R where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab := by
contrapose! hab
obtain ha | ha := hab.1.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hab.2.lt_or_lt
exacts [(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha hb).ne', (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha hb).ne,
(mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ha hb).ne, (mul_pos ha hb).ne']
-- Note that we can't use `NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain` since we are merely in a semiring.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain : IsDomain R where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero {a b c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_left ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_left_of_pos ha).injective h]
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero {b a c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_right ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_right_of_pos ha).injective h]
end LinearOrder
/-! Note that `OrderDual` does not satisfy any of the ordered ring typeclasses due to the
`zero_le_one` field. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedSemiring` is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedAddCommMonoid R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered semiring. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends OrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ha hc :=
-- parentheses ensure this generates an `optParam` rather than an `autoParam`
(by simpa only [mul_comm] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ha hc)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered ring. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of non-negative elements is non-negative. -/
protected mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone
and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends OrderedRing R, CommRing R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid R,
Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- Left multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- Right multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that
addition is strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is strictly monotone
and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered ring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of two positive elements is positive. -/
protected mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommRing (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedRing R, CommRing R
/- It's not entirely clear we should assume `Nontrivial` at this point; it would be reasonable to
explore changing this, but be warned that the instances involving `Domain` may cause typeclass
search loops. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that
addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` is a nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such
that addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedCommSemiring R,
LinearOrderedSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedRing` is a ring with a linear order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedRing R, LinearOrder R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a linear order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends LinearOrderedRing R, CommMonoid R
attribute [nolint docBlame]
StrictOrderedSemiring.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
StrictOrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
LinearOrderedSemiring.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedRing.toLinearOrder
OrderedSemiring.toOrderedAddCommMonoid
OrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
StrictOrderedCommRing.toCommRing
OrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
OrderedCommRing.toCommRing
StrictOrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
LinearOrderedCommSemiring.toLinearOrderedSemiring
LinearOrderedCommRing.toCommMonoid
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b c : R}
lemma one_add_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : a + b + b * c ≤ c) : 1 + a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_add_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : a + c + b * c ≤ b) : 1 + a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : b + b * c ≤ a + c) : 1 - a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm c]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : c + b * c ≤ a + b) : 1 - a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm b]
gcongr
end OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs.lean | 753 | 756 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
/-!
# Refinements
In order to prove injectivity/surjectivity/exactness properties for diagrams
in the category of abelian groups, we often need to do diagram chases.
Some of these can be carried out in more general abelian categories:
for example, a morphism `X ⟶ Y` in an abelian category `C` is a
monomorphism if and only if for all `A : C`, the induced map
`(A ⟶ X) → (A ⟶ Y)` of abelian groups is a monomorphism, i.e. injective.
Alternatively, the yoneda presheaf functor which sends `X` to the
presheaf of maps `A ⟶ X` for all `A : C` preserves and reflects
monomorphisms.
However, if `p : X ⟶ Y` is an epimorphism in `C` and `A : C`,
`(A ⟶ X) → (A ⟶ Y)` may fail to be surjective (unless `p` is a split
epimorphism).
In this file, the basic result is `epi_iff_surjective_up_to_refinements`
which states that `f : X ⟶ Y` is a morphism in an abelian category,
then it is an epimorphism if and only if for all `y : A ⟶ Y`,
there exists an epimorphism `π : A' ⟶ A` and `x : A' ⟶ X` such
that `π ≫ y = x ≫ f`. In other words, if we allow a precomposition
with an epimorphism, we may lift a morphism to `Y` to a morphism to `X`.
Following unpublished notes by George Bergman, we shall say that the
precomposition by an epimorphism `π ≫ y` is a refinement of `y`. Then,
we get that an epimorphism is a morphism that is "surjective up to refinements".
(This result is similar to the fact that a morphism of sheaves on
a topological space or a site is epi iff sections can be lifted
locally. Then, arguing "up to refinements" is very similar to
arguing locally for a Grothendieck topology (TODO: indeed,
show that it corresponds to the "refinements" topology on an
abelian category `C` that is defined by saying that
a sieve is covering if it contains an epimorphism).
Similarly, it is possible to show that a short complex in an abelian
category is exact if and only if it is exact up to refinements
(see `ShortComplex.exact_iff_exact_up_to_refinements`).
As it is outlined in the documentation of the file
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`, the Freyd-Mitchell
embedding theorem implies the existence of a faithful and exact functor `ι`
from an abelian category `C` to the category of abelian groups. If we
define a pseudo-element of `X : C` to be an element in `ι.obj X`, one
may do diagram chases in any abelian category using these pseudo-elements.
However, using this approach would require proving this embedding theorem!
Currently, mathlib contains a weaker notion of pseudo-elements
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`. Some theorems can be obtained
using this notion, but there is the issue that for this notion
of pseudo-elements a morphism `X ⟶ Y` in `C` is not determined by
its action on pseudo-elements (see also `Counterexamples/Pseudoelement.lean`).
On the contrary, the approach consisting of working up to refinements
does not require the introduction of other types: we only need to work
with morphisms `A ⟶ X` in `C` which we may consider as being
"sort of elements of `X`". One may carry diagram-chasing by tracking
these morphisms and sometimes introducing an auxiliary epimorphism `A' ⟶ A`.
## References
* George Bergman, A note on abelian categories – translating element-chasing proofs,
and exact embedding in abelian groups (1974)
http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/papers/unpub/elem-chase.pdf
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] [Abelian C] {X Y : C} (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
lemma epi_iff_surjective_up_to_refinements (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Epi f ↔ ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (y : A ⟶ Y),
∃ (A' : C) (π : A' ⟶ A) (_ : Epi π) (x : A' ⟶ X), π ≫ y = x ≫ f := by
constructor
· intro _ A a
exact ⟨pullback a f, pullback.fst a f, inferInstance, pullback.snd a f, pullback.condition⟩
· intro hf
obtain ⟨A, π, hπ, a', fac⟩ := hf (𝟙 Y)
rw [comp_id] at fac
exact epi_of_epi_fac fac.symm
lemma surjective_up_to_refinements_of_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] {A : C} (y : A ⟶ Y) :
∃ (A' : C) (π : A' ⟶ A) (_ : Epi π) (x : A' ⟶ X), π ≫ y = x ≫ f :=
(epi_iff_surjective_up_to_refinements f).1 inferInstance y
| lemma ShortComplex.exact_iff_exact_up_to_refinements :
S.Exact ↔ ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (x₂ : A ⟶ S.X₂) (_ : x₂ ≫ S.g = 0),
∃ (A' : C) (π : A' ⟶ A) (_ : Epi π) (x₁ : A' ⟶ S.X₁), π ≫ x₂ = x₁ ≫ S.f := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_toCycles, epi_iff_surjective_up_to_refinements]
constructor
· intro hS A a ha
obtain ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, fac⟩ := hS (S.liftCycles a ha)
exact ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, by simpa only [assoc, liftCycles_i, toCycles_i] using fac =≫ S.iCycles⟩
· intro hS A a
obtain ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, fac⟩ := hS (a ≫ S.iCycles) (by simp)
exact ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, by simp only [← cancel_mono S.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i, fac]⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Refinements.lean | 93 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Outer Measures
An outer measure is a function `μ : Set α → ℝ≥0∞`, from the powerset of a type to the extended
nonnegative real numbers that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is monotone;
3. `μ` is countably subadditive. This means that the outer measure of a countable union is at most
the sum of the outer measure on the individual sets.
Note that we do not need `α` to be measurable to define an outer measure.
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section OuterMeasureClass
variable {α ι F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α]
{μ : F} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
theorem measure_empty : μ ∅ = 0 := OuterMeasureClass.measure_empty μ
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem measure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : μ s ≤ μ t :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_mono μ h
theorem measure_mono_null (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ s = 0 :=
eq_bot_mono (measure_mono h) ht
lemma measure_eq_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s = ∞) : μ t = ∞ := eq_top_mono (measure_mono h) hs
lemma measure_lt_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono h).trans_lt ht
theorem measure_pos_of_superset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s ≠ 0) : 0 < μ t :=
hs.bot_lt.trans_le (measure_mono h)
theorem measure_iUnion_le [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) : μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, μ (s i) := by
refine rel_iSup_tsum μ measure_empty (· ≤ ·) (fun t ↦ ?_) _
calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) = μ (⋃ i, disjointed t i) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (disjointed t i) :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_iUnion_nat_le _ _ (disjoint_disjointed _)
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (t i) := by gcongr; exact disjointed_subset ..
theorem measure_biUnion_le {I : Set ι} (μ : F) (hI : I.Countable) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑' i : I, μ (s i) := by
have := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply measure_iUnion_le
theorem measure_biUnion_finset_le (I : Finset ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) :=
(measure_biUnion_le μ I.countable_toSet s).trans_eq <| I.tsum_subtype (μ <| s ·)
theorem measure_iUnion_fintype_le [Fintype ι] (μ : F) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑ i, μ (s i) := by
simpa using measure_biUnion_finset_le Finset.univ s
theorem measure_union_le (s t : Set α) : μ (s ∪ t) ≤ μ s + μ t := by
simpa [union_eq_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_fintype_le μ (cond · s t)
lemma measure_univ_le_add_compl (s : Set α) : μ univ ≤ μ s + μ sᶜ :=
s.union_compl_self ▸ measure_union_le s sᶜ
theorem measure_le_inter_add_diff (μ : F) (s t : Set α) : μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := by
simpa using measure_union_le (s ∩ t) (s \ t)
theorem measure_diff_null (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
(measure_mono diff_subset).antisymm <| calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ t + μ (s \ t) := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = μ (s \ t) := by simp [ht]
theorem measure_biUnion_null_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Countable) {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, μ (s i) = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h i hi ↦ measure_mono_null (subset_biUnion_of_mem hi) h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
have _ := hI.to_subtype
simpa [h] using measure_iUnion_le (μ := μ) fun x : I ↦ s x
theorem measure_sUnion_null_iff {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Countable) :
μ (⋃₀ S) = 0 ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = 0 := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion_null_iff hS]
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_null_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ (s i) = 0 := by
rw [← sUnion_range, measure_sUnion_null_iff (countable_range s), forall_mem_range]
alias ⟨_, measure_iUnion_null⟩ := measure_iUnion_null_iff
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_null_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 ∧ μ t = 0 := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem measure_union_null (hs : μ s = 0) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 := by simp [*]
lemma measure_null_iff_singleton (hs : s.Countable) : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ {x} = 0 := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_null_iff hs, biUnion_of_singleton]
/-- Let `μ` be an (outer) measure; let `s : ι → Set α` be a sequence of sets, `S = ⋃ n, s n`.
If `μ (S \ s n)` tends to zero along some nontrivial filter (usually `Filter.atTop` on `ι = ℕ`),
then `μ S = ⨆ n, μ (s n)`. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_of_tendsto_zero {ι} (μ : F) {s : ι → Set α} (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l]
(h0 : Tendsto (fun k => μ ((⋃ n, s n) \ s k)) l (𝓝 0)) : μ (⋃ n, s n) = ⨆ n, μ (s n) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| iSup_le fun n ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
set S := ⋃ n, s n
set M := ⨆ n, μ (s n)
have A : ∀ k, μ S ≤ M + μ (S \ s k) := fun k ↦ calc
μ S ≤ μ (S ∩ s k) + μ (S \ s k) := measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ (s k) + μ (S \ s k) := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ M + μ (S \ s k) := by gcongr; exact le_iSup (μ ∘ s) k
have B : Tendsto (fun k ↦ M + μ (S \ s k)) l (𝓝 M) := by simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.add h0
| exact ge_of_tendsto' B A
/-- If a set has zero measure in a neighborhood of each of its points, then it has zero measure
in a second-countable space. -/
theorem measure_null_of_locally_null [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
(s : Set α) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[s] x, μ u = 0) : μ s = 0 := by
choose! u hxu hu₀ using hs
choose t ht using TopologicalSpace.countable_cover_nhdsWithin hxu
rcases ht with ⟨ts, t_count, ht⟩
apply measure_mono_null ht
exact (measure_biUnion_null_iff t_count).2 fun x hx => hu₀ x (ts hx)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Basic.lean | 138 | 148 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Adrian Wüthrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adrian Wüthrich
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
/-!
# Laplacian Matrix
This module defines the Laplacian matrix of a graph, and proves some of its elementary properties.
## Main definitions & Results
* `SimpleGraph.degMatrix`: The degree matrix of a simple graph
* `SimpleGraph.lapMatrix`: The Laplacian matrix of a simple graph, defined as the difference
between the degree matrix and the adjacency matrix.
* `isPosSemidef_lapMatrix`: The Laplacian matrix is positive semidefinite.
* `card_connectedComponent_eq_finrank_ker_toLin'_lapMatrix`:
The number of connected components in a graph
is the dimension of the nullspace of its Laplacian matrix.
-/
open Finset Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (R : Type*)
variable [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
theorem degree_eq_sum_if_adj {R : Type*} [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (i : V) :
(G.degree i : R) = ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then 1 else 0 := by
unfold degree neighborFinset neighborSet
rw [sum_boole, Set.toFinset_setOf]
variable [DecidableEq V]
/-- The diagonal matrix consisting of the degrees of the vertices in the graph. -/
def degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := Matrix.diagonal (G.degree ·)
/-- The *Laplacian matrix* `lapMatrix G R` of a graph `G`
is the matrix `L = D - A` where `D` is the degree and `A` the adjacency matrix of `G`. -/
def lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := G.degMatrix R - G.adjMatrix R
variable {R}
theorem isSymm_degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : (G.degMatrix R).IsSymm :=
isSymm_diagonal _
theorem isSymm_lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : (G.lapMatrix R).IsSymm :=
(isSymm_degMatrix _).sub (isSymm_adjMatrix _)
theorem degMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.degMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v := by
rw [degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocRing R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.lapMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v - ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp_rw [lapMatrix, sub_mulVec, Pi.sub_apply, degMatrix_mulVec_apply, adjMatrix_mulVec_apply]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_const_eq_zero [NonAssocRing R] :
mulVec (G.lapMatrix R) (fun _ ↦ 1) = 0 := by
ext1 i
rw [lapMatrix_mulVec_apply]
simp
theorem dotProduct_mulVec_degMatrix [CommSemiring R] (x : V → R) :
x ⬝ᵥ (G.degMatrix R *ᵥ x) = ∑ i : V, G.degree i * x i * x i := by
simp only [dotProduct, degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
variable (R)
/-- Let $L$ be the graph Laplacian and let $x \in \mathbb{R}$, then
$$x^{\top} L x = \sum_{i \sim j} (x_{i}-x_{j})^{2}$$,
where $\sim$ denotes the adjacency relation -/
theorem lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂' [Field R] [CharZero R] (x : V → R) :
toLinearMap₂' R (G.lapMatrix R) x x =
(∑ i : V, ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then (x i - x j)^2 else 0) / 2 := by
simp_rw [toLinearMap₂'_apply', lapMatrix, sub_mulVec, dotProduct_sub, dotProduct_mulVec_degMatrix,
dotProduct_mulVec_adjMatrix, ← sum_sub_distrib, degree_eq_sum_if_adj, sum_mul, ite_mul, one_mul,
zero_mul, ← sum_sub_distrib, ite_sub_ite, sub_zero]
rw [← add_self_div_two (∑ x_1 : V, ∑ x_2 : V, _)]
conv_lhs => enter [1,2,2,i,2,j]; rw [if_congr (adj_comm G i j) rfl rfl]
conv_lhs => enter [1,2]; rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [← sum_add_distrib, ite_add_ite]
congr 2 with i
congr 2 with j
ring_nf
/-- The Laplacian matrix is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_lapMatrix [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [StarRing R]
[TrivialStar R] : PosSemidef (G.lapMatrix R) := by
constructor
· rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_eq_transpose_of_trivial, isSymm_lapMatrix]
· intro x
rw [star_trivial, ← toLinearMap₂'_apply', lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂']
positivity
theorem lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj
[Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (x : V → R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R (G.lapMatrix R) x x = 0 ↔ ∀ i j : V, G.Adj i j → x i = x j := by
simp (disch := intros; positivity)
[lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂', sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, sub_eq_zero]
theorem lapMatrix_toLin'_apply_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj (x : V → ℝ) :
Matrix.toLin' (G.lapMatrix ℝ) x = 0 ↔ ∀ i j : V, G.Adj i j → x i = x j := by
rw [← (posSemidef_lapMatrix ℝ G).toLinearMap₂'_zero_iff, star_trivial,
lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj]
theorem lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_reachable (x : V → ℝ) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' ℝ (G.lapMatrix ℝ) x x = 0 ↔
∀ i j : V, G.Reachable i j → x i = x j := by
rw [lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj]
refine ⟨?_, fun h i j hA ↦ h i j hA.reachable⟩
intro h i j ⟨w⟩
induction w with
| nil => rfl
| cons hA _ h' => exact (h _ _ hA).trans h'
theorem lapMatrix_toLin'_apply_eq_zero_iff_forall_reachable (x : V → ℝ) :
Matrix.toLin' (G.lapMatrix ℝ) x = 0 ↔ ∀ i j : V, G.Reachable i j → x i = x j := by
rw [← (posSemidef_lapMatrix ℝ G).toLinearMap₂'_zero_iff, star_trivial,
lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_reachable]
section
variable [DecidableEq G.ConnectedComponent]
lemma mem_ker_toLin'_lapMatrix_of_connectedComponent {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
[DecidableEq G.ConnectedComponent] (c : G.ConnectedComponent) :
(fun i ↦ if connectedComponentMk G i = c then 1 else 0) ∈
LinearMap.ker (toLin' (lapMatrix ℝ G)) := by
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, lapMatrix_toLin'_apply_eq_zero_iff_forall_reachable]
intro i j h
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃
· rfl
· rw [← ConnectedComponent.eq] at h
exact (h₂ (h₁ ▸ h.symm)).elim
· rw [← ConnectedComponent.eq] at h
exact (h₁ (h₃ ▸ h)).elim
· rfl
/-- Given a connected component `c` of a graph `G`, `lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux c` is the map
`V → ℝ` which is `1` on the vertices in `c` and `0` elsewhere.
| The family of these maps indexed by the connected components of `G` proves to be a basis
of the kernel of `lapMatrix G R` -/
def lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux (c : G.ConnectedComponent) :
LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' (G.lapMatrix ℝ)) :=
⟨fun i ↦ if G.connectedComponentMk i = c then (1 : ℝ) else 0,
mem_ker_toLin'_lapMatrix_of_connectedComponent c⟩
lemma linearIndependent_lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux :
LinearIndependent ℝ (lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux G) := by
rw [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff]
intro g h0
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h0
have h : ∑ c, g c • lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux G c = fun i ↦ g (connectedComponentMk G i) := by
simp only [lapMatrix_ker_basis_aux, SetLike.mk_smul_mk, AddSubmonoid.coe_finset_sum]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/LapMatrix.lean | 148 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untopD_zero_mul a b
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe _
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
map_zero' := toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, toReal_top, mul_zero]
theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
theorem toReal_eq_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal = b.toReal ↔ a = b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simp only [coe_inj, NNReal.coe_inj, coe_toReal]
protected theorem trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal := by
simpa only [or_iff_not_imp_left] using toReal_pos
protected theorem trichotomy₂ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 ∨
p = 0 ∧ q = ∞ ∨
p = 0 ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∨
p = ∞ ∧ q = ∞ ∨
0 < p.toReal ∧ q = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∧ p.toReal ≤ q.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (bot_le : 0 ≤ p) with ((rfl : 0 = p) | (hp : 0 < p))
· simpa using q.trichotomy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_top : q ≤ ∞) with (rfl | hq)
· simpa using p.trichotomy
repeat' right
have hq' : 0 < q := lt_of_lt_of_le hp hpq
have hp' : p < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt hpq hq
simp [ENNReal.toReal_mono hq.ne hpq, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff, hp, hp', hq', hq]
protected theorem dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal :=
haveI : p = ⊤ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
simpa using ENNReal.trichotomy₂ (Fact.out : 1 ≤ p)
this.imp_right fun h => h.2
theorem toReal_pos_iff_ne_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : 0 < p.toReal ↔ p ≠ ∞ :=
⟨fun h hp =>
have : (0 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := toReal_top ▸ (hp ▸ h.ne : 0 ≠ ∞.toReal)
this rfl,
fun h => zero_lt_one.trans_le (p.dichotomy.resolve_left h)⟩
end Real
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, toNNReal_top, NNReal.iInf_empty]
· lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [← coe_iInf, toNNReal_coe]
theorem toNNReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toNNReal = sInf (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sInf_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iInf hf)
theorem toNNReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toNNReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [toNNReal_coe]
by_cases h : BddAbove (range f)
· rw [← coe_iSup h, toNNReal_coe]
· rw [NNReal.iSup_of_not_bddAbove h, iSup_coe_eq_top.2 h, toNNReal_top]
|
theorem toNNReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toNNReal = sSup (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 394 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metrizable
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each Borel measurable function can be approximated pointwise
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ ℕ`: the `SimpleFunc` sending
each `x : α` to the point `e k` which is the nearest to `x` among `e 0`, ..., `e N`.
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn (f : β → α) (hf : Measurable f) (s : Set α) (y₀ : α)
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (n : ℕ) : β →ₛ α` : a simple function that takes values in `s`
and approximates `f`.
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn` (pointwise convergence): If `f x ∈ s`, then the sequence of simple
approximations `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n`, evaluated at `x`,
tends to `f x` as `n` tends to `∞`.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
-/
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Pointwise approximation by simple functions -/
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
/-- `nearestPtInd e N x` is the index `k` such that `e k` is the nearest point to `x` among the
points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than one point are at the same distance from `x`, then
`nearestPtInd e N x` returns the least of their indexes. -/
noncomputable def nearestPtInd (e : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α →ₛ ℕ
| 0 => const α 0
| N + 1 =>
piecewise (⋂ k ≤ N, { x | edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x })
(MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
measurableSet_lt measurable_edist_right measurable_edist_right)
(const α <| N + 1) (nearestPtInd e N)
/-- `nearestPt e N x` is the nearest point to `x` among the points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than
one point are at the same distance from `x`, then `nearestPt e N x` returns the point with the
least possible index. -/
noncomputable def nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ α :=
(nearestPtInd e N).map e
@[simp]
theorem nearestPtInd_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPtInd e 0 = const α 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nearestPt_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPt e 0 = const α (e 0) :=
rfl
theorem nearestPtInd_succ (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) :
nearestPtInd e (N + 1) x =
if ∀ k ≤ N, edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x then N + 1 else nearestPtInd e N x := by
simp only [nearestPtInd, coe_piecewise, Set.piecewise]
congr
simp
| theorem nearestPtInd_le (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) : nearestPtInd e N x ≤ N := by
induction' N with N ihN; · simp
simp only [nearestPtInd_succ]
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, ihN.trans N.le_succ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDense.lean | 87 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Grothendieck topologies
Definition and lemmas about Grothendieck topologies.
A Grothendieck topology for a category `C` is a set of sieves on each object `X` satisfying
certain closure conditions.
Alternate versions of the axioms (in arrow form) are also described.
Two explicit examples of Grothendieck topologies are given:
* The dense topology
* The atomic topology
as well as the complete lattice structure on Grothendieck topologies (which gives two additional
explicit topologies: the discrete and trivial topologies.)
A pretopology, or a basis for a topology is defined in
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Pretopology.lean`. The topology associated
to a topological space is defined in `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Spaces.lean`.
## Tags
Grothendieck topology, coverage, pretopology, site
## References
* [nLab, *Grothendieck topology*](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+topology)
* [S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, *Sheaves in Geometry and Logic*][MM92]
## Implementation notes
We use the definition of [nlab] and [MM92][] (Chapter III, Section 2), where Grothendieck topologies
are saturated collections of morphisms, rather than the notions of the Stacks project (00VG) and
the Elephant, in which topologies are allowed to be unsaturated, and are then completed.
TODO (BM): Add the definition from Stacks, as a pretopology, and complete to a topology.
This is so that we can produce a bijective correspondence between Grothendieck topologies on a
small category and Lawvere-Tierney topologies on its presheaf topos, as well as the equivalence
between Grothendieck topoi and left exact reflective subcategories of presheaf toposes.
-/
universe v₁ u₁ v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The definition of a Grothendieck topology: a set of sieves `J X` on each object `X` satisfying
three axioms:
1. For every object `X`, the maximal sieve is in `J X`.
2. If `S ∈ J X` then its pullback along any `h : Y ⟶ X` is in `J Y`.
3. If `S ∈ J X` and `R` is a sieve on `X`, then provided that the pullback of `R` along any arrow
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S` is in `J Y`, we have that `R` itself is in `J X`.
A sieve `S` on `X` is referred to as `J`-covering, (or just covering), if `S ∈ J X`.
See also [nlab] or [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1. -/
@[stacks 00Z4]
structure GrothendieckTopology where
/-- A Grothendieck topology on `C` consists of a set of sieves for each object `X`,
which satisfy some axioms. -/
sieves : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)
/-- The sieves associated to each object must contain the top sieve.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.top_mem`. -/
top_mem' : ∀ X, ⊤ ∈ sieves X
/-- Stability under pullback. Use `GrothendieckTopology.pullback_stable`. -/
pullback_stable' : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S ∈ sieves X → S.pullback f ∈ sieves Y
/-- Transitivity of sieves in a Grothendieck topology.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.transitive`. -/
transitive' :
∀ ⦃X⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (_ : S ∈ sieves X) (R : Sieve X),
(∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → R.pullback f ∈ sieves Y) → R ∈ sieves X
namespace GrothendieckTopology
instance : DFunLike (GrothendieckTopology C) C (fun X ↦ Set (Sieve X)) where
coe J X := sieves J X
coe_injective' J₁ J₂ h := by cases J₁; cases J₂; congr
variable {C}
variable {X Y : C} {S R : Sieve X}
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
/-- An extensionality lemma in terms of the coercion to a pi-type.
We prove this explicitly rather than deriving it so that it is in terms of the coercion rather than
the projection `.sieves`.
-/
@[ext]
theorem ext {J₁ J₂ : GrothendieckTopology C} (h : (J₁ : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)) = J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
| @[simp]
theorem mem_sieves_iff_coe : S ∈ J.sieves X ↔ S ∈ J X :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Also known as the maximality axiom. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Grothendieck.lean | 105 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
| ⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 579 | 582 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Renaming variables of polynomials
This file establishes the `rename` operation on multivariate polynomials,
which modifies the set of variables.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.rename`
* `MvPolynomial.renameEquiv`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ α : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` `[CommSemiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ α`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
/-- Rename all the variables in a multivariable polynomial. -/
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, map_mul]
lemma map_comp_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) :
(map f).comp (rename g).toRingHom = (rename g).toRingHom.comp (map f) :=
RingHom.ext fun p ↦ map_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [comp_def, eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
lemma rename_comp_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) :
(rename (R := R) g).comp (rename f) = rename (g ∘ f) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ rename_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_id : rename id = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_id_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p := by
simp
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
| theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by
simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 102 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
theorem logb_zero_left : logb 0 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_zero, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_zero_left_eq_zero : logb 0 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_zero_left, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem logb_one_left : logb 1 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_one, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_one_left_eq_zero : logb 1 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_one_left, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
@[simp]
theorem logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x := by
rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
theorem logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
@[simp]
theorem logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b x⁻¹ = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
theorem inv_logb (a b : ℝ) : (logb a b)⁻¹ = logb b a := by simp_rw [logb, inv_div]
theorem inv_logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a * b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_mul h₁ h₂
theorem inv_logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a / b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_div h₁ h₂
theorem logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a * b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_mul_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a / b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_div_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem mul_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) (h₃ : b ≠ -1) :
logb a b * logb b c = logb a c := by
unfold logb
rw [mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel₀ (log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)]
theorem div_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ 1) (h₃ : c ≠ -1) :
logb a c / logb b c = logb a b :=
div_div_div_cancel_left' _ _ <| log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem logb_rpow_eq_mul_logb_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : logb b (x ^ y) = y * logb b x := by
rw [logb, log_rpow hx, logb, mul_div_assoc]
theorem logb_pow (b x : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : logb b (x ^ k) = k * logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, log_pow, mul_div_assoc]
section BPosAndNeOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_ne_one : b ≠ 1)
include b_pos b_ne_one
private theorem log_b_ne_zero : log b ≠ 0 := by
have b_ne_zero : b ≠ 0 := by linarith
have b_ne_minus_one : b ≠ -1 := by linarith
simp [b_ne_one, b_ne_zero, b_ne_minus_one]
@[simp]
theorem logb_rpow : logb b (b ^ x) = x := by
rw [logb, div_eq_iff, log_rpow b_pos]
exact log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one
theorem rpow_logb_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ logb b x = |x| := by
apply log_injOn_pos
· simp only [Set.mem_Ioi]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· simp only [abs_pos, mem_Ioi, Ne, hx, not_false_iff]
rw [log_rpow b_pos, logb, log_abs]
field_simp [log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_logb (hx : 0 < x) : b ^ logb b x = x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem rpow_logb_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : b ^ logb b x = -x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem logb_eq_iff_rpow_eq (hy : 0 < y) : logb b y = x ↔ b ^ x = y := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· exact rpow_logb b_pos b_ne_one hy
· exact logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one
theorem surjOn_logb : SurjOn (logb b) (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨b ^ x, rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
theorem logb_surjective : Surjective (logb b) := fun x => ⟨b ^ x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_logb : range (logb b) = univ :=
(logb_surjective b_pos b_ne_one).range_eq
theorem surjOn_logb' : SurjOn (logb b) (Iio 0) univ := by
intro x _
use -b ^ x
constructor
· simp only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Set.mem_Iio]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· rw [logb_neg_eq_logb, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one]
end BPosAndNeOne
section OneLtB
variable (hb : 1 < b)
include hb
private theorem b_pos : 0 < b := by linarith
-- Name has a prime added to avoid clashing with `b_ne_one` further down the file
private theorem b_ne_one' : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb), log_le_log_iff h h₁]
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_le (h : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y :=
(logb_le_logb hb h (by linarith)).mpr hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_lt_logb (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b x < logb b y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : logb b x < logb b y ↔ x < y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
| exact log_lt_log_iff hx hy
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 195 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function -/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ` -/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element -/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ a` is the least element greater than `a` -/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function -/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred` -/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element -/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred b` is the greatest element less than `b` -/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h }
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
variable (α)
open Classical in
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun _ ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.succ_le := succ_le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMax.of_succ_le, _root_.IsMax.succ_le⟩ := succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
theorem lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (hab : b ≤ a) (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a :=
hab.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (succ_le_of_lt h) hb
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h]
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
/-- See also `Order.succ_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma le_succ_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax hab.lt.not_isMax) <| hab.lt.succ_le.lt_of_not_le hba
· exact hba.trans (le_succ _)
alias _root_.WCovBy.le_succ := le_succ_of_wcovBy
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x :=
id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_succ _ _
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
rw [← iterate_succ_apply' succ]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) :=
fun _ => (lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · ha)
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb h
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_of_le : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · <| not_isMax b)
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[gcongr] theorem succ_lt_succ (hab : a < b) : succ a < succ b := by simp [hab]
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ (a : α) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) :=
Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) :=
Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
lemma le_iff_eq_or_succ_le : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ succ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· simpa [ha.succ_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a =>
h.2.antisymm (succ_le_of_lt <| h.1.lt_of_ne <| hba.symm),
?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, le_succ b⟩
· exact ⟨le_succ a, le_rfl⟩
/-- See also `Order.le_succ_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma succ_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : succ a = b := (succ_le_of_lt h.lt).antisymm h.wcovBy.le_succ
alias _root_.CovBy.succ_eq := succ_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_succ [PartialOrder β] [SuccOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (succ a) = succ (f a) := by
by_cases h : IsMax a
· rw [h.succ_eq, (f.isMax_apply.2 h).succ_eq]
· exact (f.map_covBy.2 <| covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h).succ_eq.symm
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem succ_eq_iff_covBy : succ a = b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact covBy_succ _, CovBy.succ_eq⟩
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem succ_top : succ (⊤ : α) = ⊤ := by
rw [succ_eq_iff_isMax, isMax_iff_eq_top]
theorem succ_le_iff_eq_top : succ a ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
succ_le_iff_isMax.trans isMax_iff_eq_top
theorem lt_succ_iff_ne_top : a < succ a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.trans not_isMax_iff_ne_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem bot_lt_succ (a : α) : ⊥ < succ a :=
(lt_succ_of_not_isMax not_isMax_bot).trans_le <| succ_mono bot_le
theorem succ_ne_bot (a : α) : succ a ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_succ a).ne'
end OrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem le_of_lt_succ {a b : α} : a < succ b → a ≤ b := fun h ↦ by
by_contra! nh
exact (h.trans_le (succ_le_of_lt nh)).false
theorem lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_lt_succ, fun h => h.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha⟩
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha]
theorem succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
theorem Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ici_inter_Iic]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb,
succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb]
theorem le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : a ≤ succ b ↔ a = succ b ∨ a ≤ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· rw [hb.succ_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_eq]
· rw [← lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
(lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem not_isMin_succ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : ¬ IsMin (succ a) := by
obtain ha | ha := (le_succ a).eq_or_lt
· exact (ha ▸ succ_eq_iff_isMax.1 ha.symm).not_isMin
· exact not_isMin_of_lt ha
theorem Iic_succ (a : α) : Iic (succ a) = insert (succ a) (Iic a) :=
ext fun _ => le_succ_iff_eq_or_le
theorem Icc_succ_right (h : a ≤ succ b) : Icc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Icc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h)]
theorem Ioc_succ_right (h : a < succ b) : Ioc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Ioc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h)]
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax h
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ici, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h₁)]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ioi, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h₁)]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax b
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by simp
alias ⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, _⟩ := succ_le_succ_iff
alias ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, _⟩ := succ_lt_succ_iff
-- TODO: prove for a succ-archimedean non-linear order with bottom
@[simp]
theorem Iio_succ (a : α) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Iio_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b :=
Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
-- TODO: prove for a succ-archimedean non-linear order
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b :=
Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (not_isMax a) (not_isMax b)
theorem succ_injective : Injective (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_eq_succ_iff.1
theorem succ_ne_succ_iff : succ a ≠ succ b ↔ a ≠ b :=
succ_injective.ne_iff
alias ⟨_, succ_ne_succ⟩ := succ_ne_succ_iff
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert (a : α) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) :=
Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h <| not_isMax b
theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert (h : a < b) : Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) :=
Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h <| not_isMax b
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff_le_succ : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ b ≤ succ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· contrapose! h
exact ⟨succ a, lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.mpr (not_isMax a), h⟩
· ext x
suffices a < x → b ≤ x by simpa
exact fun hx ↦ le_of_lt_succ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| succ_strictMono hx
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem lt_succ_bot_iff [NoMaxOrder α] : a < succ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [lt_succ_iff, le_bot_iff]
theorem le_succ_bot_iff : a ≤ succ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ ∨ a = succ ⊥ := by
rw [le_succ_iff_eq_or_le, le_bot_iff, or_comm]
end OrderBot
end LinearOrder
/-- There is at most one way to define the successors in a `PartialOrder`. -/
instance [PartialOrder α] : Subsingleton (SuccOrder α) :=
⟨by
intro h₀ h₁
ext a
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· exact (@IsMax.succ_eq _ _ h₀ _ ha).trans ha.succ_eq.symm
· exact @CovBy.succ_eq _ _ h₀ _ _ (covBy_succ_of_not_isMax ha)⟩
theorem succ_eq_sInf [CompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] (a : α) :
succ a = sInf (Set.Ioi a) := by
apply (le_sInf fun b => succ_le_of_lt).antisymm
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· rw [succ_top]
exact le_top
· exact sInf_le (lt_succ_iff_ne_top.2 ha)
theorem succ_eq_iInf [CompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : succ a = ⨅ b > a, b := by
rw [succ_eq_sInf, iInf_subtype', iInf, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Ioi]
theorem succ_eq_csInf [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
succ a = sInf (Set.Ioi a) := by
apply (le_csInf nonempty_Ioi fun b => succ_le_of_lt).antisymm
exact csInf_le ⟨a, fun b => le_of_lt⟩ <| lt_succ a
/-! ### Predecessor order -/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The predecessor of an element. If `a` is not minimal, then `pred a` is the greatest element less
than `a`. If `a` is minimal, then `pred a = a`. -/
def pred : α → α :=
PredOrder.pred
theorem pred_le : ∀ a : α, pred a ≤ a :=
PredOrder.pred_le
theorem min_of_le_pred {a : α} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a :=
PredOrder.min_of_le_pred
theorem le_pred_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → a ≤ pred b :=
PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.le_pred := le_pred_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem le_pred_iff_isMin : a ≤ pred a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨min_of_le_pred, fun h => h <| pred_le _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMin.of_le_pred, _root_.IsMin.le_pred⟩ := le_pred_iff_isMin
@[simp]
theorem pred_lt_iff_not_isMin : pred a < a ↔ ¬IsMin a :=
⟨not_isMin_of_lt, fun ha => (pred_le a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| min_of_le_pred h⟩
alias ⟨_, pred_lt_of_not_isMin⟩ := pred_lt_iff_not_isMin
theorem pred_wcovBy (a : α) : pred a ⩿ a :=
⟨pred_le a, fun _ hb nh => (le_pred_of_lt nh).not_lt hb⟩
theorem pred_covBy_of_not_isMin (h : ¬IsMin a) : pred a ⋖ a :=
(pred_wcovBy a).covBy_of_lt <| pred_lt_of_not_isMin h
theorem pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le (ha : ¬IsMin a) : a ≤ b → pred a < b :=
(pred_lt_of_not_isMin ha).trans_le
theorem le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_lt <| pred_lt_of_not_isMin ha, le_pred_of_lt⟩
lemma pred_lt_pred_of_not_isMin (h : a < b) (ha : ¬ IsMin a) : pred a < pred b :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha <| le_pred_of_lt h
theorem pred_le_pred_of_not_isMin_of_le (ha : ¬IsMin a) (hb : ¬IsMin b) :
a ≤ b → pred a ≤ pred b := by
rw [le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb]
apply pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem pred_le_pred {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : pred a ≤ pred b :=
succ_le_succ h.dual
theorem pred_mono : Monotone (pred : α → α) := fun _ _ => pred_le_pred
/-- See also `Order.pred_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma pred_le_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : pred b ≤ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (hab.lt.le_pred.lt_of_not_le hba) (pred_lt_of_not_isMin hab.lt.not_isMin)
· exact (pred_le _).trans hba
alias _root_.WCovBy.pred_le := pred_le_of_wcovBy
theorem pred_iterate_le (k : ℕ) (x : α) : pred^[k] x ≤ x := by
conv_rhs => rw [(by simp only [Function.iterate_id, id] : x = id^[k] x)]
exact Monotone.iterate_le_of_le pred_mono pred_le k x
theorem isMin_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : pred^[n] a = pred^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMin (pred^[n] a) :=
@isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h_eq h_lt
theorem isMin_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : pred^[n] a = pred^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMin (pred^[n] a) :=
@isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h_eq h_ne
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ici a ⊆ Ioi (pred a) :=
fun _ ↦ pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha
theorem Iic_pred_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Iic (pred a) = Iio a :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Icc a b ⊆ Ioc (pred a) b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
apply Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ico a b ⊆ Ioo (pred a) b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iio]
gcongr
apply Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Icc_pred_right_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin b) : Icc a (pred b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem Ioc_pred_right_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin b) : Ioc a (pred b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem pred_lt (a : α) : pred a < a :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem pred_lt_of_le : a ≤ b → pred a < b :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem le_pred_iff : a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b :=
le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin b
theorem pred_le_pred_of_le : a ≤ b → pred a ≤ pred b := by intro; simp_all
theorem pred_lt_pred : a < b → pred a < pred b := by intro; simp_all
theorem pred_strictMono : StrictMono (pred : α → α) := fun _ _ => pred_lt_pred
theorem pred_covBy (a : α) : pred a ⋖ a :=
pred_covBy_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi_pred (a : α) : Ici a ⊆ Ioi (pred a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Iic_pred (a : α) : Iic (pred a) = Iio a :=
Iic_pred_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ioc (pred a) b :=
Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ Ioo (pred a) b :=
Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_pred_right (a b : α) : Icc a (pred b) = Ico a b :=
Icc_pred_right_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_pred_right (a b : α) : Ioc a (pred b) = Ioo a b :=
Ioc_pred_right_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem pred_eq_iff_isMin : pred a = a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨fun h => min_of_le_pred h.ge, fun h => h.eq_of_le <| pred_le _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.pred_eq⟩ := pred_eq_iff_isMin
lemma le_iff_eq_or_le_pred : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ≤ pred b := by
by_cases hb : IsMin b
· simpa [hb.pred_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem pred_le_le_iff {a b : α} : pred a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = pred a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a => (le_pred_of_lt <| h.2.lt_of_ne hba).antisymm h.1, ?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨pred_le b, le_rfl⟩
· exact ⟨le_rfl, pred_le a⟩
/-- See also `Order.pred_le_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma pred_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : pred b = a := h.wcovBy.pred_le.antisymm (le_pred_of_lt h.lt)
alias _root_.CovBy.pred_eq := pred_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_pred {β : Type*} [PartialOrder β] [PredOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (pred a) = pred (f a) :=
f.dual.map_succ a
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 740 | 740 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
/-!
# Isometries
We define isometries, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that preserve
the edistance (on metric spaces, these are exactly the maps that preserve distances),
and prove their basic properties. We also introduce isometric bijections.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoMetricSpace` and we specialize to `MetricSpace` when needed.
-/
open Topology
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function Set
open scoped Topology ENNReal
/-- An isometry (also known as isometric embedding) is a map preserving the edistance
between pseudoemetric spaces, or equivalently the distance between pseudometric space. -/
def Isometry [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x1 x2 : α, edist (f x1) (f x2) = edist x1 x2
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves nonnegative
distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_nndist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, nndist (f x) (f y) = nndist x y := by
simp only [Isometry, edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_inj]
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_dist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) = dist x y := by
simp only [isometry_iff_nndist_eq, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_inj]
/-- An isometry preserves distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.dist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- A map that preserves distances is an isometry -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_dist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves non-negative distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.nndist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
/-- A map that preserves non-negative distances is an isometry. -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_nndist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
namespace Isometry
section PseudoEmetricIsometry
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {f : α → β} {x : α}
/-- An isometry preserves edistances. -/
theorem edist_eq (hf : Isometry f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) = edist x y :=
hf x y
theorem lipschitz (h : Isometry f) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun x y => (h x y).le
theorem antilipschitz (h : Isometry f) : AntilipschitzWith 1 f := fun x y => by
simp only [h x y, ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, le_refl]
/-- Any map on a subsingleton is an isometry -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem _root_.isometry_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Isometry f := fun x y => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]; simp
/-- The identity is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_id : Isometry (id : α → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
theorem prodMap {δ} [PseudoEMetricSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : Isometry f)
(hg : Isometry g) : Isometry (Prod.map f g) := fun x y => by
simp only [Prod.edist_eq, Prod.map_fst, hf.edist_eq, Prod.map_snd, hg.edist_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias prod_map := prodMap
protected theorem piMap {ι} [Fintype ι] {α β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (β i)] (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, Isometry (f i)) :
Isometry (Pi.map f) := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, (hf _).edist_eq, Pi.map_apply]
/-- The composition of isometries is an isometry. -/
theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Isometry g) (hf : Isometry f) : Isometry (g ∘ f) :=
fun _ _ => (hg _ _).trans (hf _ _)
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform continuous map -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : Isometry f) : UniformContinuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform inducing map -/
theorem isUniformInducing (hf : Isometry f) : IsUniformInducing f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isUniformInducing hf.uniformContinuous
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff {ι : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {a : Filter ι} {b : α}
(hf : Isometry f) : Filter.Tendsto g a (𝓝 b) ↔ Filter.Tendsto (f ∘ g) a (𝓝 (f b)) :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
/-- An isometry is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : Isometry f) : Continuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
/-- The right inverse of an isometry is an isometry. -/
theorem right_inv {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : Isometry f) (hg : RightInverse g f) : Isometry g :=
fun x y => by rw [← h, hg _, hg _]
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall (f x) r = EMetric.closedBall x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.ball (f x) r = EMetric.ball x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
/-- Isometries preserve the diameter in pseudoemetric spaces. -/
theorem ediam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (f '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image, hf.edist_eq]
theorem ediam_range (hf : Isometry f) : EMetric.diam (range f) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.ediam_image univ
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.ball x r) (EMetric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_ball x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.closedBall x r) (EMetric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_closedBall x r).ge
/-- The injection from a subtype is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_subtype_coe {s : Set α} : Isometry ((↑) : s → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) s ↔ ContinuousOn g s :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.continuousOn_iff.symm
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} :
Continuous (f ∘ g) ↔ Continuous g :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.continuous_iff.symm
end PseudoEmetricIsometry
--section
section EmetricIsometry
variable [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is injective -/
protected theorem injective (h : Isometry f) : Injective f :=
h.antilipschitz.injective
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is a uniform embedding -/
lemma isUniformEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isUniformEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is an embedding -/
theorem isEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : IsEmbedding f := hf.isUniformEmbedding.isEmbedding
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding := isEmbedding
/-- An isometry from a complete emetric space is a closed embedding -/
theorem isClosedEmbedding [CompleteSpace α] [EMetricSpace γ] {f : α → γ} (hf : Isometry f) :
IsClosedEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isClosedEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
end EmetricIsometry
--section
section PseudoMetricIsometry
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry preserves the diameter in pseudometric spaces. -/
theorem diam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (f '' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [Metric.diam, Metric.diam, hf.ediam_image]
theorem diam_range (hf : Isometry f) : Metric.diam (range f) = Metric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.diam_image univ
theorem preimage_setOf_dist (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (p : ℝ → Prop) :
f ⁻¹' { y | p (dist y (f x)) } = { y | p (dist y x) } := by
ext y
simp [hf.dist_eq]
theorem preimage_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (f x) r = Metric.closedBall x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· ≤ r)
theorem preimage_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.ball (f x) r = Metric.ball x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· < r)
theorem preimage_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.sphere (f x) r = Metric.sphere x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· = r)
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_ball x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.sphere x r) (Metric.sphere (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_sphere x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_closedBall x r).ge
end PseudoMetricIsometry
-- section
end Isometry
-- namespace
/-- A uniform embedding from a uniform space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.to_isometry {α β} [UniformSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
/-- An embedding from a topological space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem Topology.IsEmbedding.to_isometry {α β} [TopologicalSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsEmbedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.to_isometry := IsEmbedding.to_isometry
theorem PseudoEMetricSpace.isometry_induced (f : α → β) [m : PseudoEMetricSpace β] :
letI := m.induced f; Isometry f := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem PsuedoMetricSpace.isometry_induced (f : α → β) [m : PseudoMetricSpace β] :
letI := m.induced f; Isometry f := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem EMetricSpace.isometry_induced (f : α → β) (hf : f.Injective) [m : EMetricSpace β] :
letI := m.induced f hf; Isometry f := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem MetricSpace.isometry_induced (f : α → β) (hf : f.Injective) [m : MetricSpace β] :
letI := m.induced f hf; Isometry f := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
-- such a bijection need not exist
/-- `α` and `β` are isometric if there is an isometric bijection between them. -/
structure IsometryEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
extends α ≃ β where
isometry_toFun : Isometry toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ᵢ " => IsometryEquiv
namespace IsometryEquiv
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
-- TODO: add `IsometryEquivClass`
theorem toEquiv_injective : Injective (toEquiv : (α ≃ᵢ β) → (α ≃ β))
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem toEquiv_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ β} : e₁.toEquiv = e₂.toEquiv ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
toEquiv_injective.eq_iff
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ᵢ β) α β where
coe e := e.toEquiv
inv e := e.toEquiv.symm
left_inv e := e.left_inv
right_inv e := e.right_inv
coe_injective' _ _ h _ := toEquiv_injective <| DFunLike.ext' h
theorem coe_eq_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (a : α) : h a = h.toEquiv a := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toEquiv = h := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h) : ⇑(mk e h) = e := rfl
protected theorem isometry (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Isometry h :=
h.isometry_toFun
protected theorem bijective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Bijective h :=
h.toEquiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Injective h :=
h.toEquiv.injective
protected theorem surjective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Surjective h :=
h.toEquiv.surjective
protected theorem edist_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x y : α) : edist (h x) (h y) = edist x y :=
h.isometry.edist_eq x y
protected theorem dist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : dist (h x) (h y) = dist x y :=
h.isometry.dist_eq x y
protected theorem nndist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : nndist (h x) (h y) = nndist x y :=
h.isometry.nndist_eq x y
protected theorem continuous (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Continuous h :=
h.isometry.continuous
@[simp]
theorem ediam_image (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (h '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
h.isometry.ediam_image s
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃h₁ h₂ : α ≃ᵢ β⦄ (H : ∀ x, h₁ x = h₂ x) : h₁ = h₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
/-- Alternative constructor for isometric bijections,
taking as input an isometry, and a right inverse. -/
def mk' {α : Type u} [EMetricSpace α] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) (hfg : ∀ x, f (g x) = x)
(hf : Isometry f) : α ≃ᵢ β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv _ := hf.injective <| hfg _
right_inv := hfg
isometry_toFun := hf
/-- The identity isometry of a space. -/
protected def refl (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ Equiv.refl α with isometry_toFun := isometry_id }
/-- The composition of two isometric isomorphisms, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def trans (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) : α ≃ᵢ γ :=
{ Equiv.trans h₁.toEquiv h₂.toEquiv with
isometry_toFun := h₂.isometry_toFun.comp h₁.isometry_toFun }
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : α) : h₁.trans h₂ x = h₂ (h₁ x) :=
rfl
/-- The inverse of an isometric isomorphism, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β ≃ᵢ α where
isometry_toFun := h.isometry.right_inv h.right_inv
toEquiv := h.toEquiv.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α → β := h
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β → α :=
h.symm
initialize_simps_projections IsometryEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : h.symm.symm = h := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Bijective (IsometryEquiv.symm : (α ≃ᵢ β) → β ≃ᵢ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (y : β) : h (h.symm y) = y :=
h.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply y
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) : h.symm (h x) = x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply x
theorem symm_apply_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : h.symm y = x ↔ y = h x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : x = h.symm y ↔ h x = y :=
h.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
theorem symm_comp_self (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h.symm : β → α) ∘ h = id := funext h.left_inv
theorem self_comp_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h : α → β) ∘ h.symm = id := funext h.right_inv
theorem range_eq_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : range h = univ := by simp
theorem image_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : image h.symm = preimage h :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.symm.toEquiv.left_inv h.symm.toEquiv.right_inv
theorem preimage_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : preimage h.symm = image h :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.toEquiv.left_inv h.toEquiv.right_inv).symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : γ) :
(h₁.trans h₂).symm x = h₁.symm (h₂.symm x) :=
rfl
theorem ediam_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set β) := by
rw [← h.range_eq_univ, h.isometry.ediam_range]
@[simp]
theorem ediam_preimage (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set β) : EMetric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = EMetric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, ediam_image]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_ball, symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_closedBall, symm_symm]
/-- The (bundled) homeomorphism associated to an isometric isomorphism. -/
@[simps toEquiv]
protected def toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α ≃ₜ β where
continuous_toFun := h.continuous
continuous_invFun := h.symm.continuous
toEquiv := h.toEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph = h :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph.symm = h.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (h ∘ f) s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} :
Continuous (h ∘ f) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff' {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : β → γ} :
Continuous (f ∘ h) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff'
/-- The group of isometries. -/
instance : Group (α ≃ᵢ α) where
one := IsometryEquiv.refl _
mul e₁ e₂ := e₂.trans e₁
inv := IsometryEquiv.symm
mul_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
one_mul _ := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_one _ := ext fun _ => rfl
inv_mul_cancel e := ext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : α ≃ᵢ α) = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
theorem mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : (e₁ * e₂) x = e₁ (e₂ x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem inv_apply_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e⁻¹ (e x) = x := e.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp] theorem apply_inv_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e (e⁻¹ x) = x := e.apply_symm_apply x
theorem completeSpace_iff (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α ↔ CompleteSpace β := by
simp only [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, ← e.range_eq_univ, ← image_univ,
isComplete_image_iff e.isometry.isUniformInducing]
protected theorem completeSpace [CompleteSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α :=
e.completeSpace_iff.2 ‹_›
/-- The natural isometry `∀ i, Y i ≃ᵢ ∀ j, Y (e.symm j)` obtained from a bijection `ι ≃ ι'` of
fintypes. `Equiv.piCongrLeft'` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def piCongrLeft' {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι] [Fintype ι'] {Y : ι → Type*}
[∀ j, PseudoEMetricSpace (Y j)] (e : ι ≃ ι') : (∀ i, Y i) ≃ᵢ ∀ j, Y (e.symm j) where
toEquiv := Equiv.piCongrLeft' _ e
isometry_toFun x1 x2 := by
simp_rw [edist_pi_def, Finset.sup_univ_eq_iSup]
exact (Equiv.iSup_comp (g := fun b ↦ edist (x1 b) (x2 b)) e.symm)
/-- The natural isometry `∀ i, Y (e i) ≃ᵢ ∀ j, Y j` obtained from a bijection `ι ≃ ι'` of fintypes.
`Equiv.piCongrLeft` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def piCongrLeft {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι] [Fintype ι'] {Y : ι' → Type*}
[∀ j, PseudoEMetricSpace (Y j)] (e : ι ≃ ι') : (∀ i, Y (e i)) ≃ᵢ ∀ j, Y j :=
(piCongrLeft' e.symm).symm
/-- The natural isometry `(α ⊕ β → γ) ≃ᵢ (α → γ) × (β → γ)` between the type of maps on a sum of
fintypes `α ⊕ β` and the pairs of functions on the types `α` and `β`.
`Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def sumArrowIsometryEquivProdArrow [Fintype α] [Fintype β] : (α ⊕ β → γ) ≃ᵢ (α → γ) × (β → γ) where
toEquiv := Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow _ _ _
isometry_toFun _ _ := by simp [Prod.edist_eq, edist_pi_def, Finset.sup_univ_eq_iSup, iSup_sum]
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowIsometryEquivProdArrow_toHomeomorph {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] :
sumArrowIsometryEquivProdArrow.toHomeomorph
= Homeomorph.sumArrowHomeomorphProdArrow (ι := α) (ι' := β) (X := γ) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Fin.edist_append_eq_max_edist (m n : ℕ) {x x2 : Fin m → α} {y y2 : Fin n → α} :
edist (Fin.append x y) (Fin.append x2 y2) = max (edist x x2) (edist y y2) := by
simp [edist_pi_def, Finset.sup_univ_eq_iSup, ← Equiv.iSup_comp (e := finSumFinEquiv),
Prod.edist_eq, iSup_sum]
/-- The natural `IsometryEquiv` between `(Fin m → α) × (Fin n → α)` and `Fin (m + n) → α`.
`Fin.appendEquiv` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Fin.appendIsometry (m n : ℕ) : (Fin m → α) × (Fin n → α) ≃ᵢ (Fin (m + n) → α) where
toEquiv := Fin.appendEquiv _ _
isometry_toFun _ _ := by simp_rw [Fin.appendEquiv, Fin.edist_append_eq_max_edist, Prod.edist_eq]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Fin.appendIsometry_toHomeomorph (m n : ℕ) :
(Fin.appendIsometry m n).toHomeomorph = Fin.appendHomeomorph (X := α) m n :=
rfl
variable (ι α)
/-- `Equiv.funUnique` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def funUnique [Unique ι] [Fintype ι] : (ι → α) ≃ᵢ α where
toEquiv := Equiv.funUnique ι α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Finset.univ_unique, Finset.sup_singleton]
/-- `piFinTwoEquiv` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def piFinTwo (α : Fin 2 → Type*) [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] : (∀ i, α i) ≃ᵢ α 0 × α 1 where
toEquiv := piFinTwoEquiv α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Fin.univ_succ, Prod.edist_eq]
end PseudoEMetricSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
@[simp]
theorem diam_image (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (h '' s) = Metric.diam s :=
h.isometry.diam_image s
@[simp]
theorem diam_preimage (s : Set β) : Metric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, diam_image]
include h in
theorem diam_univ : Metric.diam (univ : Set α) = Metric.diam (univ : Set β) :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal h.ediam_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.ball x r = Metric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sphere (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.sphere x r = Metric.sphere (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_sphere (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall x r = Metric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem image_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ) : h '' Metric.ball x r = Metric.ball (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_ball, symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem image_sphere (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
h '' Metric.sphere x r = Metric.sphere (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_sphere, symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem image_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
h '' Metric.closedBall x r = Metric.closedBall (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_closedBall, symm_symm]
end PseudoMetricSpace
end IsometryEquiv
/-- An isometry induces an isometric isomorphism between the source space and the
range of the isometry. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs toEquiv apply]
def Isometry.isometryEquivOnRange [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Isometry f) : α ≃ᵢ range f where
isometry_toFun := h
toEquiv := Equiv.ofInjective f h.injective
open NNReal in
/-- Post-composition by an isometry does not change the Lipschitz-property of a function. -/
lemma Isometry.lipschitzWith_iff {α β γ : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
[PseudoEMetricSpace γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : Isometry g) :
LipschitzWith K (g ∘ f) ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by
simp [LipschitzWith, h.edist_eq]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Isometry.lean | 658 | 662 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Kernel
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
/-!
# Independence of sets of sets and measure spaces (σ-algebras)
* A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for
any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets `f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`,
`μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i)`. It will be used for families of π-systems.
* A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. I.e., `m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω` is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i)`.
* Independence of sets (or events in probabilistic parlance) is defined as independence of the
measurable space structures they generate: a set `s` generates the measurable space structure with
measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
* Independence of functions (or random variables) is also defined as independence of the measurable
space structures they generate: a function `f` for which we have a measurable space `m` on the
codomain generates `MeasurableSpace.comap f m`.
## Main statements
* `iIndepSets.iIndep`: if π-systems are independent as sets of sets, then the
measurable space structures they generate are independent.
* `IndepSets.indep`: variant with two π-systems.
## Implementation notes
The definitions of independence in this file are a particular case of independence with respect to a
kernel and a measure, as defined in the file `Kernel.lean`.
We provide four definitions of independence:
* `iIndepSets`: independence of a family of sets of sets `pi : ι → Set (Set Ω)`. This is meant to
be used with π-systems.
* `iIndep`: independence of a family of measurable space structures `m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω`,
* `iIndepSet`: independence of a family of sets `s : ι → Set Ω`,
* `iIndepFun`: independence of a family of functions. For measurable spaces
`m : Π (i : ι), MeasurableSpace (β i)`, we consider functions `f : Π (i : ι), Ω → β i`.
Additionally, we provide four corresponding statements for two measurable space structures (resp.
sets of sets, sets, functions) instead of a family. These properties are denoted by the same names
as for a family, but without the starting `i`, for example `IndepFun` is the version of `iIndepFun`
for two functions.
The definition of independence for `iIndepSets` uses finite sets (`Finset`). See
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.iIndepSets`. An alternative and equivalent way of defining independence
would have been to use countable sets.
Most of the definitions and lemmas in this file list all variables instead of using the `variable`
keyword at the beginning of a section, for example
`lemma Indep.symm {Ω} {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : measure Ω} ...` .
This is intentional, to be able to control the order of the `MeasurableSpace` variables. Indeed
when defining `μ` in the example above, the measurable space used is the last one defined, here
`{_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}`, and not `m₁` or `m₂`.
## References
* Williams, David. Probability with martingales. Cambridge university press, 1991.
Part A, Chapter 4.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.Integrable
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace Set
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι β γ : Type*} {κ : ι → Type*}
section Definitions
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i) `.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def iIndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSets π (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for any sets
`t₁ ∈ p₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def IndepSets {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω}
(s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSets s1 s2 (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. `m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω` is independent with respect to measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i)`. -/
def iIndep (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) :
Prop :=
Kernel.iIndep m (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (defined on a third σ-algebra) if for any sets `t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`,
`μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def Indep (m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω)
{_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.Indep m₁ m₂ (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- A family of sets is independent if the family of measurable space structures they generate is
independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def iIndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s : ι → Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSet s (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- Two sets are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are independent.
For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def IndepSet {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (s t : Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSet s t (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `Ω` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is independent if the family of measurable space
structures they generate on `Ω` is independent. For a function `g` with codomain having measurable
space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap g m`. -/
def iIndepFun {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {β : ι → Type*} [m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x)]
(f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepFun f (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
/-- Two functions are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated
measurable space structure is `MeasurableSpace.comap f m`. -/
def IndepFun {β γ} {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepFun f g (Kernel.const Unit μ) (Measure.dirac () : Measure Unit)
end Definitions
section Definition_lemmas
variable {π : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω} {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
{S : Finset ι} {s : ι → Set Ω}
lemma iIndepSets_iff (π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndepSets π μ ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i) := by
simp only [iIndepSets, Kernel.iIndepSets, ae_dirac_eq, Filter.eventually_pure, Kernel.const_apply]
lemma iIndepSets.meas_biInter (h : iIndepSets π μ) (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω}
(hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i) : μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i) :=
(iIndepSets_iff _ _).1 h s hf
lemma iIndepSets.isProbabilityMeasure (h : iIndepSets π μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
⟨by simpa using h ∅ (f := fun _ ↦ univ)⟩
lemma iIndepSets.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (h : iIndepSets π μ) (hs : ∀ i, s i ∈ π i) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, μ (s i) := by simp [← h.meas_biInter _ fun _i _ ↦ hs _]
lemma IndepSets_iff (s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω) :
IndepSets s1 s2 μ ↔ ∀ t1 t2 : Set Ω, t1 ∈ s1 → t2 ∈ s2 → (μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2) := by
simp only [IndepSets, Kernel.IndepSets, ae_dirac_eq, Filter.eventually_pure, Kernel.const_apply]
lemma iIndep_iff_iIndepSets (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndep m μ ↔ iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) μ := by
simp only [iIndep, iIndepSets, Kernel.iIndep]
lemma iIndep.iIndepSets' {m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω}
{_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} (hμ : iIndep m μ) :
iIndepSets (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) μ := (iIndep_iff_iIndepSets _ _).1 hμ
lemma iIndep.isProbabilityMeasure (h : iIndep m μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
h.iIndepSets'.isProbabilityMeasure
lemma iIndep_iff (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndep m μ ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → MeasurableSet[m i] (f i)),
μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f i) := by
simp only [iIndep_iff_iIndepSets, iIndepSets_iff]; rfl
lemma iIndep.meas_biInter (hμ : iIndep m μ) (hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
μ (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, μ (s i) := (iIndep_iff _ _).1 hμ _ hs
lemma iIndep.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] (hμ : iIndep m μ) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[m i] (s i)) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, μ (s i) := by simp [← hμ.meas_biInter fun _ _ ↦ hs _]
lemma Indep_iff_IndepSets (m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω) :
Indep m₁ m₂ μ ↔ IndepSets {s | MeasurableSet[m₁] s} {s | MeasurableSet[m₂] s} μ := by
simp only [Indep, IndepSets, Kernel.Indep]
lemma Indep_iff (m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω) {_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (μ : Measure Ω) :
Indep m₁ m₂ μ
↔ ∀ t1 t2, MeasurableSet[m₁] t1 → MeasurableSet[m₂] t2 → μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2 := by
rw [Indep_iff_IndepSets, IndepSets_iff]; rfl
lemma iIndepSet_iff_iIndep (s : ι → Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndepSet s μ ↔ iIndep (fun i ↦ generateFrom {s i}) μ := by
simp only [iIndepSet, iIndep, Kernel.iIndepSet]
lemma iIndepSet.isProbabilityMeasure (h : iIndepSet s μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
((iIndepSet_iff_iIndep _ _).1 h).isProbabilityMeasure
lemma iIndepSet_iff (s : ι → Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndepSet s μ ↔ ∀ (s' : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω}
(_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s' → MeasurableSet[generateFrom {s i}] (f i)),
μ (⋂ i ∈ s', f i) = ∏ i ∈ s', μ (f i) := by
simp only [iIndepSet_iff_iIndep, iIndep_iff]
lemma IndepSet_iff_Indep (s t : Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω) :
IndepSet s t μ ↔ Indep (generateFrom {s}) (generateFrom {t}) μ := by
simp only [IndepSet, Indep, Kernel.IndepSet]
lemma IndepSet_iff (s t : Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω) :
IndepSet s t μ ↔ ∀ t1 t2, MeasurableSet[generateFrom {s}] t1
→ MeasurableSet[generateFrom {t}] t2 → μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2 := by
simp only [IndepSet_iff_Indep, Indep_iff]
lemma iIndepFun_iff_iIndep {β : ι → Type*}
(m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x)) (f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndepFun f μ ↔ iIndep (fun x ↦ (m x).comap (f x)) μ := by
simp only [iIndepFun, iIndep, Kernel.iIndepFun]
@[nontriviality, simp]
lemma iIndepSets.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] {m : ι → Set (Set Ω)} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
iIndepSets m μ := Kernel.iIndepSets.of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality, simp]
lemma iIndep.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] {m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
iIndep m μ := Kernel.iIndep.of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality, simp]
lemma iIndepFun.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] {β : ι → Type*} {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (β i)}
{f : ∀ i, Ω → β i} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : iIndepFun f μ :=
Kernel.iIndepFun.of_subsingleton
protected lemma iIndepFun.iIndep {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (κ i)} {f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → κ x}
(hf : iIndepFun f μ) :
iIndep (fun x ↦ (m x).comap (f x)) μ := hf
lemma iIndepFun_iff {β : ι → Type*}
(m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x)) (f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (μ : Measure Ω) :
iIndepFun f μ ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f' : ι → Set Ω}
(_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → MeasurableSet[(m i).comap (f i)] (f' i)),
μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f' i) = ∏ i ∈ s, μ (f' i) := by
simp only [iIndepFun_iff_iIndep, iIndep_iff]
lemma iIndepFun.meas_biInter {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (κ i)} {f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → κ x}
(hf : iIndepFun f μ) (hs : ∀ i, i ∈ S → MeasurableSet[(m i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
μ (⋂ i ∈ S, s i) = ∏ i ∈ S, μ (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_biInter hs
lemma iIndepFun.meas_iInter [Fintype ι] {m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (κ i)} {f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → κ x}
(hf : iIndepFun f μ) (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[(m i).comap (f i)] (s i)) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ∏ i, μ (s i) := hf.iIndep.meas_iInter hs
lemma IndepFun_iff_Indep [mβ : MeasurableSpace β]
[mγ : MeasurableSpace γ] (f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
IndepFun f g μ ↔ Indep (MeasurableSpace.comap f mβ) (MeasurableSpace.comap g mγ) μ := by
simp only [IndepFun, Indep, Kernel.IndepFun]
lemma IndepFun_iff {β γ} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
IndepFun f g μ ↔ ∀ t1 t2, MeasurableSet[MeasurableSpace.comap f mβ] t1
→ MeasurableSet[MeasurableSpace.comap g mγ] t2 → μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2 := by
rw [IndepFun_iff_Indep, Indep_iff]
lemma IndepFun.meas_inter [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [mγ : MeasurableSpace γ] {f : Ω → β} {g : Ω → γ}
(hfg : IndepFun f g μ) {s t : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[mβ.comap f] s)
(ht : MeasurableSet[mγ.comap g] t) :
μ (s ∩ t) = μ s * μ t :=
(IndepFun_iff _ _ _).1 hfg _ _ hs ht
end Definition_lemmas
section Indep
variable {m₁ m₂ m₃ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω)
{_mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
@[symm]
theorem IndepSets.symm {s₁ s₂ : Set (Set Ω)} (h : IndepSets s₁ s₂ μ) : IndepSets s₂ s₁ μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.symm h
@[symm]
theorem Indep.symm (h : Indep m₁ m₂ μ) : Indep m₂ m₁ μ := IndepSets.symm h
theorem indep_bot_right [IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μ] : Indep m' ⊥ μ :=
Kernel.indep_bot_right m'
theorem indep_bot_left [IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μ] : Indep ⊥ m' μ := (indep_bot_right m').symm
theorem indepSet_empty_right [IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μ] (s : Set Ω) : IndepSet s ∅ μ :=
Kernel.indepSet_empty_right s
theorem indepSet_empty_left [IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μ] (s : Set Ω) : IndepSet ∅ s μ :=
Kernel.indepSet_empty_left s
theorem indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_left {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set (Set Ω)}
(h_indep : IndepSets s₁ s₂ μ) (h31 : s₃ ⊆ s₁) :
IndepSets s₃ s₂ μ :=
Kernel.indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_left h_indep h31
theorem indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_right {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set (Set Ω)}
(h_indep : IndepSets s₁ s₂ μ) (h32 : s₃ ⊆ s₂) :
IndepSets s₁ s₃ μ :=
Kernel.indepSets_of_indepSets_of_le_right h_indep h32
theorem indep_of_indep_of_le_left (h_indep : Indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h31 : m₃ ≤ m₁) :
Indep m₃ m₂ μ :=
Kernel.indep_of_indep_of_le_left h_indep h31
theorem indep_of_indep_of_le_right (h_indep : Indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h32 : m₃ ≤ m₂) :
Indep m₁ m₃ μ :=
Kernel.indep_of_indep_of_le_right h_indep h32
theorem IndepSets.union {s₁ s₂ s' : Set (Set Ω)} (h₁ : IndepSets s₁ s' μ) (h₂ : IndepSets s₂ s' μ) :
IndepSets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.union h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem IndepSets.union_iff {s₁ s₂ s' : Set (Set Ω)} :
IndepSets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ ↔ IndepSets s₁ s' μ ∧ IndepSets s₂ s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.union_iff
theorem IndepSets.iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s' : Set (Set Ω)}
(hyp : ∀ n, IndepSets (s n) s' μ) :
IndepSets (⋃ n, s n) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.iUnion hyp
theorem IndepSets.bUnion {s : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s' : Set (Set Ω)}
{u : Set ι} (hyp : ∀ n ∈ u, IndepSets (s n) s' μ) :
IndepSets (⋃ n ∈ u, s n) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.bUnion hyp
theorem IndepSets.inter {s₁ s' : Set (Set Ω)} (s₂ : Set (Set Ω)) (h₁ : IndepSets s₁ s' μ) :
IndepSets (s₁ ∩ s₂) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.inter s₂ h₁
theorem IndepSets.iInter {s : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s' : Set (Set Ω)}
(h : ∃ n, IndepSets (s n) s' μ) :
IndepSets (⋂ n, s n) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.iInter h
theorem IndepSets.bInter {s : ι → Set (Set Ω)} {s' : Set (Set Ω)}
{u : Set ι} (h : ∃ n ∈ u, IndepSets (s n) s' μ) :
IndepSets (⋂ n ∈ u, s n) s' μ :=
Kernel.IndepSets.bInter h
theorem indepSets_singleton_iff {s t : Set Ω} :
IndepSets {s} {t} μ ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = μ s * μ t := by
simp only [IndepSets, Kernel.indepSets_singleton_iff, ae_dirac_eq, Filter.eventually_pure,
Kernel.const_apply]
end Indep
/-! ### Deducing `Indep` from `iIndep` -/
|
section FromIndepToIndep
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/Basic.lean | 351 | 354 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
/-!
# Iterations of a function
In this file we prove simple properties of `Nat.iterate f n` a.k.a. `f^[n]`:
* `iterate_zero`, `iterate_succ`, `iterate_succ'`, `iterate_add`, `iterate_mul`:
formulas for `f^[0]`, `f^[n+1]` (two versions), `f^[n+m]`, and `f^[n*m]`;
* `iterate_id` : `id^[n]=id`;
* `Injective.iterate`, `Surjective.iterate`, `Bijective.iterate` :
iterates of an injective/surjective/bijective function belong to the same class;
* `LeftInverse.iterate`, `RightInverse.iterate`, `Commute.iterate_left`, `Commute.iterate_right`,
`Commute.iterate_iterate`:
some properties of pairs of functions survive under iterations
* `iterate_fixed`, `Function.Semiconj.iterate_*`, `Function.Semiconj₂.iterate`:
if `f` fixes a point (resp., semiconjugates unary/binary operations), then so does `f^[n]`.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Iterate a function. -/
def Nat.iterate {α : Sort u} (op : α → α) : ℕ → α → α
| 0, a => a
| succ k, a => iterate op k (op a)
@[inherit_doc Nat.iterate]
notation:max f "^["n"]" => Nat.iterate f n
namespace Function
open Function (Commute)
variable (f : α → α)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_zero : f^[0] = id :=
rfl
theorem iterate_zero_apply (x : α) : f^[0] x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = f^[n] ∘ f :=
rfl
theorem iterate_succ_apply (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = f^[n] (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (n : ℕ) : (id : α → α)^[n] = id :=
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ihn ↦ by rw [iterate_succ, ihn, id_comp]
theorem iterate_add (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, f^[m + n] = f^[m] ∘ f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| Nat.succ n => by rw [Nat.add_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_add m n]; rfl
| theorem iterate_add_apply (m n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[m + n] x = f^[m] (f^[n] x) := by
rw [iterate_add f m n]
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Iterate.lean | 71 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.EuclideanDist
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.NormPow
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Interval
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegralEqImproper
/-!
# Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality
In this file we prove the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
This states that for compactly supported `C¹`-functions between finite dimensional vector spaces,
we can bound the `L^p`-norm of `u` by the `L^q` norm of the derivative of `u`.
The bound is up to a constant that is independent of the function `u`.
Let `n` be the dimension of the domain.
The main step in the proof, which we dubbed the "grid-lines lemma" below, is a complicated
inductive argument that involves manipulating an `n+1`-fold iterated integral and a product of
`n+2` factors. In each step, one pushes one of the integral inside (all but one of)
the factors of the product using Hölder's inequality. The precise formulation of the induction
hypothesis (`MeasureTheory.GridLines.T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton`) is tricky,
and none of the 5 sources we referenced stated it.
In the formalization we use the operation `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` to work with the iterated
integrals, and use `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'` to conveniently push one of the integrals
inside. The Hölder's inequality step is done using `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le`.
The conclusions of the main results below are an estimation up to a constant multiple.
We don't really care about this constant, other than that it only depends on some pieces of data,
typically `E`, `μ`, `p` and sometimes also the codomain of `u` or the support of `u`.
We state these constants as separate definitions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq`:
The bound holds for `1 ≤ p`, `0 < n` and `q⁻¹ = p⁻¹ - n⁻¹`
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_le`:
The bound holds when `1 ≤ p < n`, `0 ≤ q` and `p⁻¹ - n⁻¹ ≤ q⁻¹`.
Note that in this case the constant depends on the support of `u`.
Potentially also useful:
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_one`: this is the inequality for `q = 1`.
In this version, the codomain can be an arbitrary Banach space.
* `MeasureTheory.eLpNorm_le_eLpNorm_fderiv_of_eq_inner`: in this version,
the codomain is assumed to be a Hilbert space, without restrictions on its dimension.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open Set Function Finset MeasureTheory Measure Filter
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*}
local prefix:max "#" => Fintype.card
/-! ## The grid-lines lemma -/
variable {A : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (A i)]
(μ : ∀ i, Measure (A i))
namespace MeasureTheory
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
namespace GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines operation" (not a standard name) which is central in the inductive proof of the
Sobolev inequality.
For a finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, a finite set `s` of
indices from `ι`, and a (later assumed nonnegative) real number `p`, this operation acts on a
function `f` from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The operation is to partially
integrate, in the `s` co-ordinates, the function whose value at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by
multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each co-ordinate `i` in `s`, of a certain
power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i` direction through `x`.
We are most interested in this operation when the set `s` is the universe in `ι`, but as a proxy for
"induction on dimension" we define it for a general set `s` of co-ordinates: the `s`-grid-lines
operation on a function `f` which is constant along the co-ordinates in `sᶜ` is morally (that is, up
to type-theoretic nonsense) the same thing as the universe-grid-lines operation on the associated
function on the "lower-dimensional" space `Π i : s, A i`. -/
def T (p : ℝ) (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ
variable {p : ℝ}
@[simp] lemma T_univ [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f univ x =
∫⁻ (x : ∀ i, A i), (f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ i : ι, (∫⁻ t : A i, f (update x i t) ∂(μ i)) ^ p) ∂(.pi μ) := by
simp [T, lmarginal_singleton]
@[simp] lemma T_empty (f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, A i) :
T μ p f ∅ x = f x ^ (1 + p) := by
simp [T]
/-- The main inductive step in the grid-lines lemma for the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
The grid-lines operation `GridLines.T` on a nonnegative function on a finitary product type is
less than or equal to the grid-lines operation of its partial integral in one co-ordinate
(the latter intuitively considered as a function on a space "one dimension down"). -/
theorem T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (s : Finset ι)
(hp : (s.card : ℝ) * p ≤ 1)
(i : ι) (hi : i ∉ s) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
T μ p f (insert i s) ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := by
/- The proof is a tricky computation that relies on Hölder's inequality at its heart.
The left-hand-side is an `|s|+1`-times iterated integral. Let `xᵢ` denote the `i`-th variable.
We first push the integral over the `i`-th variable as the
innermost integral. This is done in a single step with `MeasureTheory.lmarginal_insert'`,
but in fact hides a repeated application of Fubini's theorem.
The integrand is a product of `|s|+2` factors, in `|s|+1` of them we integrate over one
additional variable. We split of the factor that integrates over `xᵢ`,
and apply Hölder's inequality to the remaining factors (whose powers sum exactly to 1).
After reordering factors, and combining two factors into one we obtain the right-hand side. -/
calc T μ p f (insert i s)
= ∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s,
f ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p) * ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) ^ p ∂μ := by
-- unfold `T` and reformulate the exponents
simp_rw [T, card_insert_of_not_mem hi]
congr!
push_cast
ring
_ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ (t : A i),
(f (update x i t) ^ (1 - (s.card : ℝ) * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (update x i t) ^ p) ∂ (μ i)) ∂μ := by
-- pull out the integral over `xᵢ`
rw [lmarginal_insert' _ _ hi]
· congr! with x t
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
· change Measurable (fun x ↦ _)
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
refine (hf.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ ?_
exact fun _ _ ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.pow_const _
_ ≤ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) s := lmarginal_mono (s := s) (fun x ↦ ?_)
-- The remainder of the computation happens within an `|s|`-fold iterated integral
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Finset.prod_apply]
set X := update x i
have hF₁ : ∀ {j : ι}, Measurable fun t ↦ (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) :=
fun {_} ↦ hf.lmarginal μ |>.comp <| measurable_update _
have hF₀ : Measurable fun t ↦ f (X t) := hf.comp <| measurable_update _
let k : ℝ := s.card
have hk' : 0 ≤ 1 - k * p := by linarith only [hp]
calc ∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ insert i s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p ∂ (μ i)
= ∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p * (f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ^ p)) ∂(μ i) := by
-- rewrite integrand so that `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) ^ p` comes first
clear_value X
congr! 2 with t
simp_rw [prod_insert hi]
ring_nf
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
∫⁻ t, f (X t) ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, ((∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t)) ^ p ∂(μ i) := by
-- pull out this constant factor
have : ∀ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) (X t) = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x := by
intro t
rw [lmarginal_update_of_mem]
exact Iff.mpr Finset.mem_singleton rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_const_mul]
exact (hF₀.pow_const _).mul <| Finset.measurable_prod _ fun _ _ ↦ hF₁.pow_const _
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⁻ t, f (X t) ∂μ i) ^ (1 - k * p)
* ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⁻ t, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, f ∂μ) (X t) ∂μ i) ^ p) := by
-- apply Hölder's inequality
gcongr
apply ENNReal.lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le
· exact hF₀.aemeasurable
· intros
exact hF₁.aemeasurable
· simp only [sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
ring
· exact hk'
· exact fun _ _ ↦ hp₀
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ p *
((∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - k * p) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p) := by
-- absorb the newly-created integrals into `∫⋯∫`
congr! 2
· rw [lmarginal_singleton]
refine prod_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
have hi' : i ∉ ({j} : Finset ι) := by
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj ⊢
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
rw [lmarginal_insert _ hf hi']
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (p + (1 - k * p)) * ∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i, j}, f ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- combine two `(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) x` terms
rw [ENNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg]
· ring
· exact hp₀
· exact hk'
_ ≤ (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x ^ (1 - (s.card - 1 : ℝ) * p) *
∏ j ∈ s, (∫⋯∫⁻_{j}, (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) ∂μ) x ^ p := by
-- identify the result with the RHS integrand
congr! 2 with j hj
· ring
· congr! 1
rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· congr
rw [Finset.union_comm]
rfl
· rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_compl] at hj
exact fun h ↦ hi (h ▸ hj)
/-- Auxiliary result for the grid-lines lemma. Given a nonnegative function on a finitary product
type indexed by `ι`, and a set `s` in `ι`, consider partially integrating over the variables in
`sᶜ` and performing the "grid-lines operation" (see `GridLines.T`) to the resulting function in the
variables `s`. This theorem states that this operation decreases as the number of grid-lines taken
increases. -/
theorem T_lmarginal_antitone [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(hp₀ : 0 ≤ p) (hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Antitone (fun s ↦ T μ p (∫⋯∫⁻_sᶜ, f ∂μ) s) := by
-- Reformulate (by induction): a function is decreasing on `Finset ι` if it decreases under the
-- insertion of any element to any set.
rw [Finset.antitone_iff_forall_insert_le]
intro s i hi
-- apply the lemma designed to encapsulate the inductive step
convert T_insert_le_T_lmarginal_singleton μ hp₀ s ?_ i hi (hf.lmarginal μ) using 2
· rw [← lmarginal_union μ f hf]
· rw [← insert_compl_insert hi]
rfl
rw [Finset.disjoint_singleton_left, not_mem_compl]
exact mem_insert_self i s
· -- the main nontrivial point is to check that an exponent `p` satisfying `0 ≤ p` and
-- `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1` is in the valid range for the inductive-step lemma
refine le_trans ?_ hp
gcongr
suffices (s.card : ℝ) + 1 ≤ #ι by linarith
rw [← card_add_card_compl s]
norm_cast
gcongr
have hi' : sᶜ.Nonempty := ⟨i, by rwa [Finset.mem_compl]⟩
rwa [← card_pos] at hi'
end GridLines
/-- The "grid-lines lemma" (not a standard name), stated with a general parameter `p` as the
exponent. Compare with `lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le`.
For any finite dependent product `Π i : ι, A i` of sigma-finite measure spaces, for any
nonnegative real number `p` such that `(#ι - 1) * p ≤ 1`, for any function `f` from `Π i, A i` into
the extended nonnegative reals, we consider an associated "grid-lines quantity", the integral of an
associated function from `Π i, A i` into the extended nonnegative reals. The value of this function
at `x : Π i, A i` is obtained by multiplying a certain power of `f` with the product, for each
co-ordinate `i`, of a certain power of the integral of `f` along the "grid line" in the `i`
direction through `x`.
This lemma bounds the Lebesgue integral of the grid-lines quantity by a power of the Lebesgue
integral of `f`. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le
[Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] {p : ℝ} (hp₀ : 0 ≤ p)
(hp : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p ≤ 1) {f : (∀ i : ι, A i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, f x ^ (1 - (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * p) * ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, f (update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ^ p ∂.pi μ
≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂.pi μ) ^ (1 + p) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (∀ i, A i)
· simp_rw [lintegral_of_isEmpty]; refine zero_le _
inhabit ∀ i, A i
have H : (∅ : Finset ι) ≤ Finset.univ := Finset.empty_subset _
simpa [lmarginal_univ] using GridLines.T_lmarginal_antitone μ hp₀ hp hf H default
/-- Special case of the grid-lines lemma `lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le`, taking the extremal
exponent `p = (#ι - 1)⁻¹`. -/
theorem lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
{p : ℝ} (hp : Real.HolderConjugate #ι p)
{f} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, f (update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ^ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) ∂.pi μ
≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂.pi μ) ^ p := by
have : Nontrivial ι :=
Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp (by exact_mod_cast hp.lt)
have h0 : (1 : ℝ) < #ι := by norm_cast; exact Fintype.one_lt_card
have h1 : (0 : ℝ) < #ι - 1 := by linarith
have h2 : 0 ≤ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := by positivity
have h3 : (#ι - 1 : ℝ) * ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) ≤ 1 := by field_simp
have h4 : p = 1 + 1 / (↑#ι - 1) := by field_simp; rw [mul_comm, hp.sub_one_mul_conj]
rw [h4]
convert lintegral_mul_prod_lintegral_pow_le μ h2 h3 hf using 2
field_simp
end DecidableEq
/-! ## The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality -/
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
| /-- The **Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality**. Let `u` be a continuously differentiable
compactly-supported function `u` on `ℝⁿ`, for `n ≥ 2`. (More literally we encode `ℝⁿ` as
`ι → ℝ` where `n := #ι` is finite and at least 2.) Then the Lebesgue integral of the pointwise
expression `|u x| ^ (n / (n - 1))` is bounded above by the `n / (n - 1)`-th power of the Lebesgue
integral of the Fréchet derivative of `u`.
For a basis-free version, see `lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv`. -/
theorem lintegral_pow_le_pow_lintegral_fderiv_aux [Fintype ι]
{p : ℝ} (hp : Real.HolderConjugate #ι p)
{u : (ι → ℝ) → F} (hu : ContDiff ℝ 1 u)
(h2u : HasCompactSupport u) :
∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p ≤ (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ) ^ p := by
classical
/- For a function `f` in one variable and `t ∈ ℝ` we have
`|f(t)| = `|∫_{-∞}^t Df(s)∂s| ≤ ∫_ℝ |Df(s)| ∂s` where we use the fundamental theorem of calculus.
For each `x ∈ ℝⁿ` we let `u` vary in one of the `n` coordinates and apply the inequality above.
By taking the product over these `n` factors, raising them to the power `(n-1)⁻¹` and integrating,
we get the inequality `∫ |u| ^ (n/(n-1)) ≤ ∫ x, ∏ i, (∫ xᵢ, |Du(update x i xᵢ)|)^(n-1)⁻¹`.
The result then follows from the grid-lines lemma. -/
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ ↑#ι - 1 := by
have hι : (2 : ℝ) ≤ #ι := by exact_mod_cast hp.lt
linarith
calc ∫⁻ x, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ p
= ∫⁻ x, (‖u x‖ₑ ^ (1 / (#ι - 1 : ℝ))) ^ (#ι : ℝ) := by
-- a little algebraic manipulation of the exponent
congr! 2 with x
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, hp.conjugate_eq]
field_simp
_ = ∫⁻ x, ∏ _i : ι, ‖u x‖ₑ ^ (1 / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := by
-- express the left-hand integrand as a product of identical factors
congr! 2 with x
simp_rw [prod_const]
norm_cast
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ∏ i, (∫⁻ xᵢ, ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i xᵢ)‖ₑ) ^ ((1 : ℝ) / (#ι - 1 : ℝ)) := ?_
_ ≤ (∫⁻ x, ‖fderiv ℝ u x‖ₑ) ^ p := by
-- apply the grid-lines lemma
apply lintegral_prod_lintegral_pow_le _ hp
have : Continuous (fderiv ℝ u) := hu.continuous_fderiv le_rfl
fun_prop
-- we estimate |u x| using the fundamental theorem of calculus.
gcongr with x i
calc ‖u x‖ₑ
_ ≤ ∫⁻ xᵢ in Iic (x i), ‖deriv (u ∘ update x i) xᵢ‖ₑ := by
apply le_trans (by simp) (HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv _ _ _)
· exact hu.comp (by convert contDiff_update 1 x i)
· exact h2u.comp_isClosedEmbedding (isClosedEmbedding_update x i)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ xᵢ, ‖fderiv ℝ u (update x i xᵢ)‖ₑ := ?_
| Mathlib/Analysis/FunctionalSpaces/SobolevInequality.lean | 292 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FTaylorSeries
/-!
# Higher differentiability
A function is `C^1` on a domain if it is differentiable there, and its derivative is continuous.
By induction, it is `C^n` if it is `C^{n-1}` and its (n-1)-th derivative is `C^1` there or,
equivalently, if it is `C^1` and its derivative is `C^{n-1}`.
It is `C^∞` if it is `C^n` for all n.
Finally, it is `C^ω` if it is analytic (as well as all its derivative, which is automatic if the
space is complete).
We formalize these notions with predicates `ContDiffWithinAt`, `ContDiffAt`, `ContDiffOn` and
`ContDiff` saying that the function is `C^n` within a set at a point, at a point, on a set
and on the whole space respectively.
To avoid the issue of choice when choosing a derivative in sets where the derivative is not
necessarily unique, `ContDiffOn` is not defined directly in terms of the
regularity of the specific choice `iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s` inside `s`, but in terms of the
existence of a nice sequence of derivatives, expressed with a predicate
`HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn` defined in the file `FTaylorSeries`.
We prove basic properties of these notions.
## Main definitions and results
Let `f : E → F` be a map between normed vector spaces over a nontrivially normed field `𝕜`.
* `ContDiff 𝕜 n f`: expresses that `f` is `C^n`, i.e., it admits a Taylor series up to
rank `n`.
* `ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` in `s`.
* `ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x`.
* `ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x` within the set `s`.
In sets of unique differentiability, `ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s` can be expressed in terms of the
properties of `iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s` for `m ≤ n`. In the whole space,
`ContDiff 𝕜 n f` can be expressed in terms of the properties of `iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 m f`
for `m ≤ n`.
## Implementation notes
The definitions in this file are designed to work on any field `𝕜`. They are sometimes slightly more
complicated than the naive definitions one would guess from the intuition over the real or complex
numbers, but they are designed to circumvent the lack of gluing properties and partitions of unity
in general. In the usual situations, they coincide with the usual definitions.
### Definition of `C^n` functions in domains
One could define `C^n` functions in a domain `s` by fixing an arbitrary choice of derivatives (this
is what we do with `iteratedFDerivWithin`) and requiring that all these derivatives up to `n` are
continuous. If the derivative is not unique, this could lead to strange behavior like two `C^n`
functions `f` and `g` on `s` whose sum is not `C^n`. A better definition is thus to say that a
function is `C^n` inside `s` if it admits a sequence of derivatives up to `n` inside `s`.
This definition still has the problem that a function which is locally `C^n` would not need to
be `C^n`, as different choices of sequences of derivatives around different points might possibly
not be glued together to give a globally defined sequence of derivatives. (Note that this issue
can not happen over reals, thanks to partition of unity, but the behavior over a general field is
not so clear, and we want a definition for general fields). Also, there are locality
problems for the order parameter: one could image a function which, for each `n`, has a nice
sequence of derivatives up to order `n`, but they do not coincide for varying `n` and can therefore
not be glued to give rise to an infinite sequence of derivatives. This would give a function
which is `C^n` for all `n`, but not `C^∞`. We solve this issue by putting locality conditions
in space and order in our definition of `ContDiffWithinAt` and `ContDiffOn`.
The resulting definition is slightly more complicated to work with (in fact not so much), but it
gives rise to completely satisfactory theorems.
For instance, with this definition, a real function which is `C^m` (but not better) on `(-1/m, 1/m)`
for each natural `m` is by definition `C^∞` at `0`.
There is another issue with the definition of `ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x`. We can
require the existence and good behavior of derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x`
within `s`. However, this does not imply continuity or differentiability within `s` of the function
at `x` when `x` does not belong to `s`. Therefore, we require such existence and good behavior on
a neighborhood of `x` within `s ∪ {x}` (which appears as `insert x s` in this file).
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞`, and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`. To
avoid ambiguities with the two tops, the theorems name use either `infty` or `omega`.
These notations are scoped in `ContDiff`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped NNReal Topology ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG uX
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {X : Type uX} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X]
{s s₁ t u : Set E} {f f₁ : E → F} {g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {c : F} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set around a point -/
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to order `n` within a set `s` at a point `x` if
it admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` in a neighborhood of `x` in `s ∪ {x}`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
For `n = ω`, we require the function to be analytic within `s` at `x`. The precise definition we
give (all the derivatives should be analytic) is more involved to work around issues when the space
is not complete, but it is equivalent when the space is complete.
For instance, a real function which is `C^m` on `(-1/m, 1/m)` for each natural `m`, but not
better, is `C^∞` at `0` within `univ`.
-/
def ContDiffWithinAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop :=
match n with
| ω => ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω f p u ∧ ∀ i, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x i) u
| (n : ℕ∞) => ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn m f p u
lemma HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.analyticOn
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω f p s) (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x 0) s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s := by
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F) (p x 0)) s :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _ ).comp_analyticOn
h (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact this.congr (fun y hy ↦ (hf.zero_eq _ hy).symm)
lemma ContDiffWithinAt.analyticOn (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, hu, hp.analyticOn (h'p 0)⟩
lemma ContDiffWithinAt.analyticWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
obtain ⟨u, hu, hf⟩ := h.analyticOn
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (by simp) hu
exact (hf x xu).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) hu)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_omega_iff_analyticWithinAt [CompleteSpace F] :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x ↔ AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.analyticWithinAt, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h.exists_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ω
exact ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le le_top, fun i ↦ h'p i⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_nat {n : ℕ} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p u :=
⟨fun H => H n le_rfl, fun ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩ _m hm => ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le (mod_cast hm)⟩⟩
/-- When `n` is either a natural number or `ω`, one can characterize the property of being `C^n`
as the existence of a neighborhood on which there is a Taylor series up to order `n`,
requiring in addition that its terms are analytic in the `ω` case. -/
lemma contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
∃ p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p u ∧
(n = ω → ∀ i, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ p x i) u) := by
match n with
| ω => simp [ContDiffWithinAt]
| ∞ => simp at hn
| (n : ℕ) => simp [contDiffWithinAt_nat]
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.of_le (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m f s x := by
match n with
| ω => match m with
| ω => exact h
| (m : ℕ∞) =>
intro k _
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, -⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le le_top⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) => match m with
| ω => simp at hmn
| (m : ℕ∞) => exact fun k hk ↦ h k (le_trans hk (mod_cast hmn))
/-- In a complete space, a function which is analytic within a set at a point is also `C^ω` there.
Note that the same statement for `AnalyticOn` does not require completeness, see
`AnalyticOn.contDiffOn`. -/
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.contDiffWithinAt [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_omega_iff_analyticWithinAt.2 h).of_le le_top
theorem contDiffWithinAt_iff_forall_nat_le {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m f s x :=
⟨fun H _ hm => H.of_le (mod_cast hm), fun H m hm => H m hm _ le_rfl⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_infty :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ∞ f s x ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_iff_forall_nat_le.trans <| by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, le_top]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-25")] alias contDiffWithinAt_top := contDiffWithinAt_infty
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
have := h.of_le (zero_le _)
simp only [ContDiffWithinAt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero,
mem_pure, forall_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero] at this
rcases this with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
rw [mem_nhdsWithin_insert] at hu
exact (H.continuousOn.continuousWithinAt hu.1).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hu.2
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, H, H'⟩ := h
exact ⟨{x ∈ u | f₁ x = f x}, Filter.inter_mem hu (mem_nhdsWithin_insert.2 ⟨hx, h₁⟩), p,
(H.mono (sep_subset _ _)).congr fun _ ↦ And.right,
fun i ↦ (H' i).mono (sep_subset _ _)⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
let ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩ := h m hm
exact ⟨{ x ∈ u | f₁ x = f x }, Filter.inter_mem hu (mem_nhdsWithin_insert.2 ⟨hx, h₁⟩), p,
(H.mono (sep_subset _ _)).congr fun _ ↦ And.right⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁.symm hx.symm, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono x (subset_insert x s) h₁)
(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt_of_insert (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h₁.symm, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h₁⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ <| h₁.self_of_nhdsWithin hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_contDiffWithinAt_of_mem (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s):
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁.symm hx, fun H ↦ H.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h₁) hx
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr (fun x hx ↦ (h₁ x hx).symm) hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ _ hx)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_of_insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, f₁ y = f y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_of_insert (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, f₁ y = f y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, H, H'⟩ := h
exact ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert hst) hu, p, H, H'⟩
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases h m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
exact ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert hst) hu, p, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := ContDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.mono (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_mono
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (h' : EqOn f₁ f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s₁ x :=
(h.mono h₁).congr h' hx
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.congr_set (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
apply h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-23")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.congr_nhds := ContDiffWithinAt.congr_set
theorem contDiffWithinAt_congr_set {t : Set E} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_set hst, fun h => h.congr_set hst.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-23")]
alias contDiffWithinAt_congr_nhds := contDiffWithinAt_congr_set
theorem contDiffWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_congr_set (mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.1 h).symm
theorem contDiffWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAt_inter' (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h)
theorem contDiffWithinAt_insert_self :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert x s) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
match n with
| ω => simp [ContDiffWithinAt]
| (n : ℕ∞) => simp_rw [ContDiffWithinAt, insert_idem]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert y s) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hx)
· exact contDiffWithinAt_insert_self
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert _ _), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
apply h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
simp [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne hx, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨ContDiffWithinAt.of_insert, ContDiffWithinAt.insert'⟩ := contDiffWithinAt_insert
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.insert (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
theorem contDiffWithinAt_diff_singleton {y : E} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f (s \ {y}) x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, contDiffWithinAt_insert]
/-- If a function is `C^n` within a set at a point, with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable
within this set at this point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt' (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x := by
rcases contDiffWithinAt_nat.1 (h.of_le hn) with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨t, t_open, xt, tu⟩
rw [inter_comm] at tu
exact (differentiableWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds t_open xt)).1 <|
((H.mono tu).differentiableOn le_rfl) x ⟨mem_insert x s, xt⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.differentiableWithinAt' hn).mono (subset_insert x s)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`
(and moreover the function is analytic when `n = ω`). -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧
∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) u x) ∧ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f' u x := by
have h'n : n + 1 ≠ ∞ := by simpa using hn
constructor
· intro h
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty h'n).1 h with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp, H'p⟩
refine ⟨u, hu, ?_, fun y => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F) (p y 1),
fun y hy => Hp.hasFDerivWithinAt le_add_self hy, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact Hp.analyticOn (H'p rfl 0)
apply (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty hn).2
refine ⟨u, ?_, fun y : E => (p y).shift, ?_⟩
· convert @self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ x u
have : x ∈ insert x s := by simp
exact insert_eq_of_mem (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin this hu)
· rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_succ_iff_right] at Hp
refine ⟨Hp.2.2, ?_⟩
rintro rfl i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryRightEquiv' 𝕜 i E F) (p x (i + 1))) u
apply (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _).comp_analyticOn
?_ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact H'p rfl _
· rintro ⟨u, hu, hf, f', f'_eq_deriv, Hf'⟩
rw [contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty h'n]
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_iff_of_ne_infty hn).1 Hf' with ⟨v, hv, p', Hp', p'_an⟩
refine ⟨v ∩ u, ?_, fun x => (p' x).unshift (f x), ?_, ?_⟩
· apply Filter.inter_mem _ hu
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hu
exact nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x u) hv
· rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_succ_iff_right]
refine ⟨fun y _ => rfl, fun y hy => ?_, ?_⟩
· change
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun z => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f z))
(FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift (p' y) (f y) 1).curryLeft (v ∩ u) y
rw [← Function.comp_def _ f, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
convert (f'_eq_deriv y hy.2).mono inter_subset_right
rw [← Hp'.zero_eq y hy.1]
ext z
change ((p' y 0) (init (@cons 0 (fun _ => E) z 0))) (@cons 0 (fun _ => E) z 0 (last 0)) =
((p' y 0) 0) z
congr
norm_num [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· convert (Hp'.mono inter_subset_left).congr fun x hx => Hp'.zero_eq x hx.1 using 1
· ext x y
change p' x 0 (init (@snoc 0 (fun _ : Fin 1 => E) 0 y)) y = p' x 0 0 y
rw [init_snoc]
· ext x k v y
change p' x k (init (@snoc k (fun _ : Fin k.succ => E) v y))
(@snoc k (fun _ : Fin k.succ => E) v y (last k)) = p' x k v y
rw [snoc_last, init_snoc]
· intro h i
simp only [WithTop.add_eq_top, WithTop.one_ne_top, or_false] at h
match i with
| 0 =>
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift]
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ ((hf h).mono inter_subset_right)
(Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _
| i + 1 =>
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.unshift, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ ((p'_an h i).mono inter_subset_left)
(Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _
/-- A version of `contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt` where all derivatives
are taken within the same set. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt' (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x ↔
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ⊆ insert x s ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧
∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) ∧ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨u, hu, f_an, f', huf', hf'⟩ := (contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn).mp hf
obtain ⟨w, hw, hxw, hwu⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp hu
rw [inter_comm] at hwu
refine ⟨insert x s ∩ w, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (hw.mem_nhds hxw), inter_subset_left, ?_, f',
fun y hy => ?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
apply (f_an h).mono hwu
· refine ((huf' y <| hwu hy).mono hwu).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_insert _ _))
exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (hw.mem_nhds hy.2)
· exact hf'.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) hu)
· rw [← contDiffWithinAt_insert, contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn,
insert_eq_of_mem (mem_insert _ _)]
rintro ⟨u, hu, hus, f_an, f', huf', hf'⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, f_an, f', fun y hy => (huf' y hy).insert'.mono hus, hf'.insert.mono hus⟩
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set -/
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` on `s` if, for any point `x` in `s`, it
admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x` in `s`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
-/
def ContDiffOn (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : E → F) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.contDiffOn {n : ℕ∞} {f' : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f f' s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x hx m hm
use s
simp only [Set.insert_eq_of_mem hx, self_mem_nhdsWithin, true_and]
exact ⟨f', hf.of_le (mod_cast hm)⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.contDiffWithinAt (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
h x hx
theorem ContDiffOn.of_le (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : m ≤ n) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).of_le hmn
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.contDiffOn' (hm : m ≤ n) (h' : m = ∞ → n = ω)
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f (insert x s ∩ u) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n ω with rfl | hn
· obtain ⟨t, ht, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, huo, hxu, hut⟩
rw [inter_comm] at hut
refine ⟨u, huo, hxu, ?_⟩
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f (insert x s ∩ u) from this.of_le le_top
intro y hy
refine ⟨insert x s ∩ u, ?_, p, hp.mono hut, fun i ↦ (h'p i).mono hut⟩
simp only [insert_eq_of_mem, hy, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
· match m with
| ω => simp [hn] at hm
| ∞ => exact (hn (h' rfl)).elim
| (m : ℕ) =>
rcases contDiffWithinAt_nat.1 (h.of_le hm) with ⟨t, ht, p, hp⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, huo, hxu, hut⟩
rw [inter_comm] at hut
exact ⟨u, huo, hxu, (hp.mono hut).contDiffOn⟩
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.contDiffOn (hm : m ≤ n) (h' : m = ∞ → n = ω)
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ⊆ insert x s ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f u := by
obtain ⟨_u, uo, xu, h⟩ := h.contDiffOn' hm h'
exact ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (uo.mem_nhds xu), inter_subset_left, h⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.analyticOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).analyticWithinAt
/-- A function is `C^n` within a set at a point, for `n : ℕ`, if and only if it is `C^n` on
a neighborhood of this point. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_iff_contDiffOn_nhds (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f u := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases h.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨u, hu, h'u⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, h'u.2⟩
· rcases h with ⟨u, u_mem, hu⟩
have : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) u_mem
exact (hu x this).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x s) u_mem)
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.eventually (h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[insert x s] x, ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s y := by
rcases h.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨u, hu, _, hd⟩
have : ∀ᶠ y : E in 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] y ∧ y ∈ u :=
(eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin.2 hu).and hu
refine this.mono fun y hy => (hd y hy.2).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact nhdsWithin_mono y (subset_insert _ _) hy.1
theorem ContDiffOn.of_succ (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
h.of_le le_self_add
theorem ContDiffOn.one_of_succ (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 1 f s :=
h.of_le le_add_self
theorem contDiffOn_iff_forall_nat_le {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → ContDiffOn 𝕜 m f s :=
⟨fun H _ hm => H.of_le (mod_cast hm), fun H x hx m hm => H m hm x hx m le_rfl⟩
theorem contDiffOn_infty : ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
contDiffOn_iff_forall_nat_le.trans <| by simp only [le_top, forall_prop_of_true]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")] alias contDiffOn_top := contDiffOn_infty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_infty_iff_contDiffOn_omega := contDiffOn_infty
theorem contDiffOn_all_iff_nat :
(∀ (n : ℕ∞), ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
refine ⟨fun H n => H n, ?_⟩
rintro H (_ | n)
exacts [contDiffOn_infty.2 H, H n]
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem ContDiffOn.congr (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s := fun x hx => (h x hx).congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem contDiffOn_congr (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨fun H => H.congr fun x hx => (h₁ x hx).symm, fun H => H.congr h₁⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.mono (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) {t : Set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t :=
fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem ContDiffOn.congr_mono (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f₁ x = f x) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).congr h₁
/-- If a function is `C^n` on a set with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable there. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).differentiableWithinAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` around each point in a set, then it is `C^n` on the set. -/
theorem contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u)) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩
apply (contDiffWithinAt_inter _).1 (hu x ⟨xs, xu⟩)
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds u_open xu
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (hn : n ≠ ∞) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f u) ∧ ∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F,
(∀ x ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) u x) ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f' u := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn).1 (h x hx) with
⟨u, hu, f_an, f', hf', Hf'⟩
rcases Hf'.contDiffOn le_rfl (by simp [hn]) with ⟨v, vu, v'u, hv⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hu ⊢
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx hu
rw [insert_eq_of_mem xu] at vu v'u
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hu vu, fun h ↦ (f_an h).mono v'u, f',
fun y hy ↦ (hf' y (v'u hy)).mono v'u, hv⟩
· intro h x hx
rw [contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn]
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_nhbd, f_an, f', hu, hf'⟩
have : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) u_nhbd
exact ⟨u, u_nhbd, f_an, f', hu, hf' x this⟩
/-! ### Iterated derivative within a set -/
@[simp]
theorem contDiffOn_zero : ContDiffOn 𝕜 0 f s ↔ ContinuousOn f s := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.continuousOn, fun H => fun x hx m hm ↦ ?_⟩
have : (m : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 := le_antisymm (mod_cast hm) bot_le
rw [this]
refine ⟨insert x s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_⟩
rw [hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_zero_iff]
exact ⟨by rwa [insert_eq_of_mem hx], fun x _ => by simp [ftaylorSeriesWithin]⟩
theorem contDiffWithinAt_zero (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 0 f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ContinuousOn f (s ∩ u) := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩ := h 0 le_rfl
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa [hx] using H
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn_zero_iff] at hp
exact hp.1.mono inter_subset_right
· rintro ⟨u, H, hu⟩
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_inter' H]
have h' : x ∈ s ∩ u := ⟨hx, mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx H⟩
exact (contDiffOn_zero.mpr hu).contDiffWithinAt h'
/-- When a function is `C^n` in a set `s` of unique differentiability, it admits
`ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s` as a Taylor series up to order `n` in `s`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffOn.ftaylorSeriesWithin
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) s := by
constructor
· intro x _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro m hm x hx
have : (m + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n := ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hm
rcases (h x hx).of_le this _ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hu
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩
rw [inter_comm] at ho
have : p x m.succ = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x m.succ := by
change p x m.succ = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m.succ f s x
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open xo]
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter o_open) ⟨hx, xo⟩
rw [← this, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds o_open xo)]
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s y m := by
rintro y ⟨hy, yo⟩
change p y m = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s y
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open yo]
exact
(Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn (mod_cast Nat.le_succ m)
(hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩
exact
((Hp.mono ho).fderivWithin m (mod_cast lt_add_one m) x ⟨hx, xo⟩).congr
(fun y hy => (A y hy).symm) (A x ⟨hx, xo⟩).symm
· intro m hm
apply continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
intro x hx
rcases (h x hx).of_le hm _ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at ho
rw [inter_comm] at ho
refine ⟨o, o_open, xo, ?_⟩
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s y m := by
rintro y ⟨hy, yo⟩
change p y m = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s y
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open o_open yo]
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩
exact ((Hp.mono ho).cont m le_rfl).congr fun y hy => (A y hy).symm
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_subset {n : ℕ} (st : s ⊆ t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x = iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f t x :=
(((h.ftaylorSeriesWithin ht).mono st).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl hs hx).symm
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {a : E}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s a) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (ha : a ∈ s) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≤ n) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝[s] a).smallSets, HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn m f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) t := by
rcases h.contDiffOn' hm (by simp) with ⟨U, hUo, haU, hfU⟩
have : ∀ᶠ t in (𝓝[s] a).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∩ U := by
rw [eventually_smallSets_subset]
exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ <| hUo.mem_nhds haU
refine this.mono fun t ht ↦ .mono ?_ ht
rw [insert_eq_of_mem ha] at hfU
refine (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hUo)).congr_series fun k hk x hx ↦ ?_
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hUo hx.2
/-- On a set with unique differentiability, an analytic function is automatically `C^ω`, as its
successive derivatives are also analytic. This does not require completeness of the space. See
also `AnalyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace`. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.contDiffOn (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s from this.of_le le_top
rcases h.exists_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn hs with ⟨p, hp⟩
intro x hx
refine ⟨s, ?_, p, hp⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact self_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- On a set with unique differentiability, an analytic function is automatically `C^ω`, as its
successive derivatives are also analytic. This does not require completeness of the space. See
also `AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace`. -/
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn (h : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := h.analyticOn.contDiffOn hs
/-- An analytic function is automatically `C^ω` in a complete space -/
theorem AnalyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).contDiffWithinAt
/-- An analytic function is automatically `C^ω` in a complete space -/
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
h.analyticOn.contDiffOn_of_completeSpace
theorem contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn {n : ℕ∞}
(Hcont : ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ m : ℕ, m < n →
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
intro x hx m hm
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
refine ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro y _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro k hk y hy
convert (Hdiff k (lt_of_lt_of_le (mod_cast hk) (mod_cast hm)) y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt
· intro k hk
exact Hcont k (le_trans (mod_cast hk) (mod_cast hm))
theorem contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn (fun m hm => (h m hm).continuousOn) fun m hm =>
h m (le_of_lt hm)
theorem contDiffOn_of_analyticOn_iteratedFDerivWithin
(h : ∀ m, AnalyticOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s from this.of_le le_top
intro x hx
refine ⟨insert x s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
constructor
· intro y _
simp only [ftaylorSeriesWithin, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curry0_apply,
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply]
· intro k _ y hy
exact ((h k).differentiableOn y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt
· intro k _
exact (h k).continuousOn
· intro i
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact h i
theorem contDiffOn_omega_iff_analyticOn (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω f s ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h m ↦ h.analyticOn m, fun h ↦ h.contDiffOn hs⟩
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m ≤ n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) : ContinuousOn (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s :=
((h.of_le hmn).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).cont m le_rfl
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s := by
intro x hx
have : (m + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n := ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hmn
apply (((h.of_le this).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).fderivWithin m ?_ x hx).differentiableWithinAt
exact_mod_cast lt_add_one m
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedFDerivWithin {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (insert x s)) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s) s x := by
have : (m + 1 : WithTop ℕ∞) ≠ ∞ := Ne.symm (ne_of_beq_false rfl)
rcases h.contDiffOn' (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hmn) (by simp [this])
with ⟨u, uo, xu, hu⟩
set t := insert x s ∩ u
have A : t =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] x] s := by
simp only [set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal, ← nhdsWithin_inter']
rw [← inter_assoc, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem', ← diff_eq_compl_inter, insert_diff_of_mem,
diff_eq_compl_inter]
exacts [rfl, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds xu)]
have B : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f t :=
iteratedFDerivWithin_eventually_congr_set' _ A.symm _
have C : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f t) t x :=
hu.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin (Nat.cast_lt.2 m.lt_succ_self) (hs.inter uo) x
⟨mem_insert _ _, xu⟩
rw [differentiableWithinAt_congr_set' _ A] at C
exact C.congr_of_eventuallyEq (B.filter_mono inf_le_left) B.self_of_nhds
theorem contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn {n : ℕ∞} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔
(∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, m < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _m hm => h.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin (mod_cast hm) hs,
fun _m hm => h.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin (mod_cast hm) hs⟩,
fun h => contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn h.1 h.2⟩
theorem contDiffOn_nat_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn {n : ℕ} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔
(∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, m < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m f s x) s := by
rw [← WithTop.coe_natCast, contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn hs]
simp
theorem contDiffOn_succ_of_fderivWithin (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(h' : n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s)
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s := by
rcases eq_or_ne n ∞ with rfl | hn
· rw [ENat.coe_top_add_one, contDiffOn_infty]
intro m x hx
apply ContDiffWithinAt.of_le _ (show (m : WithTop ℕ∞) ≤ m + 1 from le_self_add)
rw [contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (by simp),
insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, (by simp), fderivWithin 𝕜 f s,
fun y hy => (hf y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt, (h x hx).of_le (mod_cast le_top)⟩
· intro x hx
rw [contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt hn,
insert_eq_of_mem hx]
exact ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, h', fderivWithin 𝕜 f s,
fun y hy => (hf y hy).hasFDerivWithinAt, h x hx⟩
theorem contDiffOn_of_analyticOn_of_fderivWithin (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s)
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 ω (fun y ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 (ω + 1) f s from this.of_le le_top
exact contDiffOn_succ_of_fderivWithin hf.differentiableOn (fun _ ↦ hf) h
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (expressed with `fderivWithin`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun h => contDiffOn_succ_of_fderivWithin h.1 h.2.1 h.2.2⟩
refine ⟨H.differentiableOn le_add_self, ?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact H.analyticOn
have A (m : ℕ) (hm : m ≤ n) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun y => fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) s x := by
rcases (contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt (n := m) (ne_of_beq_false rfl)).1
(H.of_le (add_le_add_right hm 1) x hx) with ⟨u, hu, -, f', hff', hf'⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩
rw [inter_comm, insert_eq_of_mem hx] at ho
have := hf'.mono ho
rw [contDiffWithinAt_inter' (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds o_open xo))] at this
apply this.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem _ hx
have : o ∩ s ∈ 𝓝[s] x := mem_nhdsWithin.2 ⟨o, o_open, xo, Subset.refl _⟩
rw [inter_comm] at this
refine Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem this fun y hy => ?_
have A : fderivWithin 𝕜 f (s ∩ o) y = f' y :=
((hff' y (ho hy)).mono ho).fderivWithin (hs.inter o_open y hy)
rwa [fderivWithin_inter (o_open.mem_nhds hy.2)] at A
match n with
| ω => exact (H.analyticOn.fderivWithin hs).contDiffOn hs (n := ω) x hx
| ∞ => exact contDiffWithinAt_infty.2 (fun m ↦ A m (mod_cast le_top))
| (n : ℕ) => exact A n le_rfl
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_uniqueDiffOn (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s ↔ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) ∧
∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f' s ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.2.1, fderivWithin 𝕜 f s, h.2.2,
fun x hx => (h.1 x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt⟩, fun ⟨f_an, h⟩ => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨f', h1, h2⟩
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h2 x hx).differentiableWithinAt, f_an, fun x hx => ?_⟩
exact (h1 x hx).congr_of_mem (fun y hy => (h2 y hy).fderivWithin (hs y hy)) hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithin := contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_uniqueDiffOn
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_fderivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s := by
rw [← ENat.coe_top_add_one, contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_fderivWithin := contDiffOn_infty_iff_fderivWithin
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on an open domain if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (expressed with `fderiv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fderiv 𝕜 f) s := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn,
contDiffOn_congr fun x hx ↦ fderivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx]
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (fderiv 𝕜 f) s := by
rw [← ENat.coe_top_add_one, contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen := contDiffOn_infty_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen
protected theorem ContDiffOn.fderivWithin (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s :=
((contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs).1 (hf.of_le hmn)).2.2
theorem ContDiffOn.fderiv_of_isOpen (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (fderiv 𝕜 f) s :=
(hf.fderivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn hmn).congr fun _ hx => (fderivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx).symm
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_fderivWithin (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s :=
((contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs).1
(h.of_le (show 0 + (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) ≤ n from hn))).2.2.continuousOn
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_fderiv_of_isOpen (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : IsOpen s)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) s :=
((contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen hs).1
(h.of_le (show 0 + (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) ≤ n from hn))).2.2.continuousOn
/-! ### Smooth functions at a point -/
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` at a point `x` if, for any integer `k ≤ n`,
| there is a neighborhood of `x` where `f` admits derivatives up to order `n`, which are continuous.
-/
def ContDiffAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : E → F) (x : E) : Prop :=
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f univ x
theorem contDiffWithinAt_univ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f univ x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x :=
Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Defs.lean | 916 | 923 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Norm
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 716 | 733 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# The Pochhammer polynomials
We define and prove some basic relations about
`ascPochhammer S n : S[X] := X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`
which is also known as the rising factorial and about
`descPochhammer R n : R[X] := X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`
which is also known as the falling factorial. Versions of this definition
that are focused on `Nat` can be found in `Data.Nat.Factorial` as `Nat.ascFactorial` and
`Nat.descFactorial`.
## Implementation
As with many other families of polynomials, even though the coefficients are always in `ℕ` or `ℤ` ,
we define the polynomial with coefficients in any `[Semiring S]` or `[Ring R]`.
In an integral domain `S`, we show that `ascPochhammer S n` is zero iff
`n` is a sufficiently large non-positive integer.
## TODO
There is lots more in this direction:
* q-factorials, q-binomials, q-Pochhammer.
-/
universe u v
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
/-- `ascPochhammer S n` is the polynomial `X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`,
with coefficients in the semiring `S`.
-/
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
rw [ascPochhammer]
theorem monic_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial S] [NoZeroDivisors S] :
Monic <| ascPochhammer S n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : leadingCoeff (X + 1 : S[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_add_C 1
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul,
leadingCoeff_comp (ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_add_C 1 : natDegree (X + 1) ≠ 0), hn,
monic_X, one_mul, one_mul, this, one_pow]
section
variable {S} {T : Type v} [Semiring T]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_map (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).map f = ascPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, ascPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval₂ (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) (t : T) :
(ascPochhammer T n).eval t = (ascPochhammer S n).eval₂ f t := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map f]
exact eval_map f t
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) [Algebra R S]
(x : S) : ((ascPochhammer S n).comp (p.map (algebraMap R S))).eval x =
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_eval₂ (algebraMap R S), ← eval₂_comp', ← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap R S),
← map_comp, eval_map]
end
|
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_cast (n k : ℕ) :
(((ascPochhammer ℕ n).eval k : ℕ) : S) = ((ascPochhammer S n).eval k : S) := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℕ S), eval_map, ← eq_natCast (algebraMap ℕ S),
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 95 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
(hs.subset inter_subset_left).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_add_encard_inter]
theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_union (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
rw [add_comm, ncard_union_add_ncard_inter _ _ hs ht]
theorem ncard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard + t.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := (s ∪ t).finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac
rw [h.cast_ncard_eq, (h.subset subset_union_left).cast_ncard_eq,
(h.subset subset_union_right).cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_union_le
rw [h.ncard]
apply zero_le
theorem ncard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_eq h]
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard + s.ncard = t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq, ht.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h]
theorem ncard_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
obtain ht | ht := t.finite_or_infinite
· rw [← ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset hst ht, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.zero_sub, (ht.diff hs).ncard]
lemma cast_ncard_sdiff {R : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne R] (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((t \ s).ncard : R) = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_diff hst (ht.subset hst), Nat.cast_sub (ncard_le_ncard hst ht)]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ (s \ t).ncard + t.ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem le_ncard_diff (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
t.ncard - s.ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr (by rw [add_comm]; apply ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard _ _ hs)
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ t).ncard + t.ncard = (s ∪ t).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left hs.diff ht, diff_union_self]
theorem diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, diff_eq_empty]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (ncard_le_ncard h' hs)
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s :=
diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard h hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard (s t : Set α)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s \ t).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_right)
(hs.inter_of_left _) hs.diff, union_comm, diff_union_inter]
theorem ncard_eq_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_eq_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard = t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard = (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_right_inj]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_le_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
| (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_le_add_iff_left]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 922 | 925 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure := HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_not_accPt h)]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot h)]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) s x := by
simp only [fderivWithin, dif_pos h]
split_ifs with h₀
exacts [h₀, Classical.choose_spec h]
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x := by
rw [fderiv, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ]
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x :=
((h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).differentiableAt hs).hasFDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.eventually_differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f y :=
(eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hs).mono fun _ => h.differentiableAt
protected theorem HasFDerivAt.fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = f' := by
ext
rw [h.unique h.differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt]
theorem fderiv_eq {f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F} (h : ∀ x, HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x) : fderiv 𝕜 f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).fderiv
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = f' :=
(hxs.eq h h.differentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt).symm
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono st⟩
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).differentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert_self :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert x s), fun h ↦ h.hasFDerivWithinAt.insert.differentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert y s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact differentiableWithinAt_insert_self
apply differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds
exact nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h
alias ⟨DifferentiableWithinAt.of_insert, DifferentiableWithinAt.insert'⟩ :=
differentiableWithinAt_insert
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
|
theorem DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 631 | 633 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,327 | 1,329 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 750 | 751 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
We define `ENNReal = ℝ≥0∞ := WithTop ℝ≥0` to be the type of extended nonnegative real numbers,
i.e., the interval `[0, +∞]`. This type is used as the codomain of a `MeasureTheory.Measure`,
and of the extended distance `edist` in an `EMetricSpace`.
In this file we set up many of the instances on `ℝ≥0∞`, and provide relationships between `ℝ≥0∞` and
`ℝ≥0`, and between `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ`. In particular, we provide a coercion from `ℝ≥0` to `ℝ≥0∞` as well
as functions `ENNReal.toNNReal`, `ENNReal.ofReal` and `ENNReal.toReal`, all of which take the value
zero wherever they cannot be the identity. Also included is the relationship between `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℕ`.
The interaction of these functions, especially `ENNReal.ofReal` and `ENNReal.toReal`, with the
algebraic and lattice structure can be found in `Data.ENNReal.Real`.
This file proves many of the order properties of `ℝ≥0∞`, with the exception of the ways those relate
to the algebraic structure, which are included in `Data.ENNReal.Operations`.
This file also defines inversion and division: this includes `Inv` and `Div` instances on `ℝ≥0∞`
making it into a `DivInvOneMonoid`.
As a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation with integer
exponent: this and other properties is shown in `Data.ENNReal.Inv`.
## Main definitions
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the extended nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞]`; defined as `WithTop ℝ≥0`; it is
equipped with the following structures:
- coercion from `ℝ≥0` defined in the natural way;
- the natural structure of a complete dense linear order: `↑p ≤ ↑q ↔ p ≤ q` and `∀ a, a ≤ ∞`;
- `a + b` is defined so that `↑p + ↑q = ↑(p + q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)` and `a + ∞ = ∞ + a = ∞`;
- `a * b` is defined so that `↑p * ↑q = ↑(p * q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)`, `0 * ∞ = ∞ * 0 = 0`, and
`a * ∞ = ∞ * a = ∞` for `a ≠ 0`;
- `a - b` is defined as the minimal `d` such that `a ≤ d + b`; this way we have
`↑p - ↑q = ↑(p - q)`, `∞ - ↑p = ∞`, `↑p - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ = 0`; note that there is no negation, only
subtraction;
The addition and multiplication defined this way together with `0 = ↑0` and `1 = ↑1` turn
`ℝ≥0∞` into a canonically ordered commutative semiring of characteristic zero.
- `a⁻¹` is defined as `Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}`. This way we have `(↑p)⁻¹ = ↑(p⁻¹)` for
`p : ℝ≥0`, `p ≠ 0`, `0⁻¹ = ∞`, and `∞⁻¹ = 0`.
- `a / b` is defined as `a * b⁻¹`.
This inversion and division include `Inv` and `Div` instances on `ℝ≥0∞`,
making it into a `DivInvOneMonoid`. Further properties of these are shown in `Data.ENNReal.Inv`.
* Coercions to/from other types:
- coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞` is defined as `Coe`, so one can use `(p : ℝ≥0)` in a context that
expects `a : ℝ≥0∞`, and Lean will apply `coe` automatically;
- `ENNReal.toNNReal` sends `↑p` to `p` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ENNReal.toReal := coe ∘ ENNReal.toNNReal` sends `↑p`, `p : ℝ≥0` to `(↑p : ℝ)` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ENNReal.ofReal := coe ∘ Real.toNNReal` sends `x : ℝ` to `↑⟨max x 0, _⟩`
- `ENNReal.neTopEquivNNReal` is an equivalence between `{a : ℝ≥0∞ // a ≠ 0}` and `ℝ≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We define a `CanLift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0` instance, so one of the ways to prove theorems about an `ℝ≥0∞`
number `a` is to consider the cases `a = ∞` and `a ≠ ∞`, and use the tactic `lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha`
in the second case. This instance is even more useful if one already has `ha : a ≠ ∞` in the
context, or if we have `(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞)`.
## Notations
* `ℝ≥0∞`: the type of the extended nonnegative real numbers;
* `ℝ≥0`: the type of nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞)`; defined in `Data.Real.NNReal`;
* `∞`: a localized notation in `ENNReal` for `⊤ : ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Function Set NNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
def ENNReal := WithTop ℝ≥0
deriving Zero, Top, AddCommMonoidWithOne, SemilatticeSup, DistribLattice, Nontrivial
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ENNReal] notation "ℝ≥0∞" => ENNReal
/-- Notation for infinity as an `ENNReal` number. -/
scoped[ENNReal] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ENNReal)
namespace ENNReal
instance : OrderBot ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : OrderTop ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderTop (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : BoundedOrder ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (BoundedOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : CharZero ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (CharZero (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : Min ℝ≥0∞ := SemilatticeInf.toMin
instance : Max ℝ≥0∞ := SemilatticeSup.toMax
noncomputable instance : CommSemiring ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : PartialOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : IsOrderedRing ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedRing (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : NoZeroDivisors ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (NoZeroDivisors (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (DenselyOrdered (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrder ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : IsOrderedAddMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedAddMonoid (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance instSub : Sub ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (Sub (WithTop ℝ≥0))
instance : OrderedSub ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (WithTop ℝ≥0))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop ℝ≥0∞ :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop (WithTop ℝ≥0))
-- RFC: redefine using pattern matching?
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨fun a => sInf { b | 1 ≤ a * b }⟩
noncomputable instance : DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
-- TODO: add a `WithTop` instance and use it here
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop ℝ≥0∞),
inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring ℝ≥0∞) with
bot_le _ := bot_le
mul_le_mul_left := fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_left'
zero_le_one := zero_le 1 }
instance : Unique (AddUnits ℝ≥0∞) where
default := 0
uniq a := AddUnits.ext <| le_zero_iff.1 <| by rw [← a.add_neg]; exact le_self_add
instance : Inhabited ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨0⟩
/-- Coercion from `ℝ≥0` to `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[coe, match_pattern] def ofNNReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := WithTop.some
instance : Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨ofNNReal⟩
/-- A version of `WithTop.recTopCoe` that uses `ENNReal.ofNNReal`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
def recTopCoe {C : ℝ≥0∞ → Sort*} (top : C ∞) (coe : ∀ x : ℝ≥0, C x) (x : ℝ≥0∞) : C x :=
WithTop.recTopCoe top coe x
instance canLift : CanLift ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0 ofNNReal (· ≠ ∞) := WithTop.canLift
@[simp] theorem none_eq_top : (none : ℝ≥0∞) = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] theorem some_eq_coe (a : ℝ≥0) : (Option.some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] theorem some_eq_coe' (a : ℝ≥0) : (WithTop.some a : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑a : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
lemma coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) := WithTop.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj : (p : ℝ≥0∞) = q ↔ p = q := coe_injective.eq_iff
lemma coe_ne_coe : (p : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ q ↔ p ≠ q := coe_inj.not
theorem range_coe' : range ofNNReal = Iio ∞ := WithTop.range_coe
theorem range_coe : range ofNNReal = {∞}ᶜ := (isCompl_range_some_none ℝ≥0).symm.compl_eq.symm
instance : NNRatCast ℝ≥0∞ where
nnratCast r := ofNNReal r
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(q : ℝ≥0) = (q : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
/-- `toNNReal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def toNNReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0 := WithTop.untopD 0
/-- `toReal x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def toReal (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Real := a.toNNReal
/-- `ofReal x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def ofReal (r : Real) : ℝ≥0∞ := r.toNNReal
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma toNNReal_coe (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = r := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNNReal : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑a.toNNReal = a
| ofNNReal _, _ => rfl
| ⊤, h => (h rfl).elim
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_toNNReal_comp {ι : Type*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞) :
(fun (x : ℝ≥0) => (x : ℝ≥0∞)) ∘ ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f = f := by
ext x
simp [coe_toNNReal (hf x)]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ENNReal.ofReal a.toReal = a := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal, ENNReal.ofReal, h]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_ofReal {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : (ENNReal.ofReal r).toReal = r :=
max_eq_left h
theorem toReal_ofReal' {r : ℝ} : (ENNReal.ofReal r).toReal = max r 0 := rfl
theorem coe_toNNReal_le_self : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞}, ↑a.toNNReal ≤ a
| ofNNReal r => by rw [toNNReal_coe]
| ⊤ => le_top
theorem coe_nnreal_eq (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofReal r := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ENNReal.ofReal x = ofNNReal ⟨x, h⟩ :=
(coe_nnreal_eq ⟨x, h⟩).symm
theorem ofNNReal_toNNReal (x : ℝ) : (Real.toNNReal x : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofReal x := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofReal_coe_nnreal : ENNReal.ofReal p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ≥0) = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ≥0) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := rfl
@[simp] theorem toReal_nonneg {a : ℝ≥0∞} : 0 ≤ a.toReal := a.toNNReal.2
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_toNNReal_eq_toReal (z : ℝ≥0∞) : (z.toNNReal : ℝ) = z.toReal := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_toReal_eq (z : ℝ≥0∞) : z.toReal.toNNReal = z.toNNReal := by
ext; simp [coe_toNNReal_eq_toReal]
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_top : ∞.toNNReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias top_toNNReal := toNNReal_top
@[simp] theorem toReal_top : ∞.toReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias top_toReal := toReal_top
@[simp] theorem toReal_one : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 1 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias one_toReal := toReal_one
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_one : (1 : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = 1 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias one_toNNReal := toNNReal_one
@[simp] theorem coe_toReal (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = r := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNNReal_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).toNNReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias zero_toNNReal := toNNReal_zero
@[simp] theorem toReal_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias zero_toReal := toReal_zero
@[simp] theorem ofReal_zero : ENNReal.ofReal (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[simp] theorem ofReal_one : ENNReal.ofReal (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} : ENNReal.ofReal a.toReal ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (ofReal_toReal ha)
theorem forall_ennreal {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a, p a) ↔ (∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
Option.forall.trans and_comm
theorem forall_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∀ a, a ≠ ∞ → p a) ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
Option.forall_ne_none
theorem exists_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞ → Prop} : (∃ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
Option.exists_ne_none
theorem toNNReal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toNNReal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x.toReal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toNNReal_ne_zero : a.toNNReal ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ a ≠ ∞ :=
a.toNNReal_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
| theorem toReal_ne_zero : a.toReal ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ a ≠ ∞ :=
a.toReal_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Basic.lean | 313 | 314 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arsinh
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Inversion.Basic
/-!
# Metric on the upper half-plane
In this file we define a `MetricSpace` structure on the `UpperHalfPlane`. We use hyperbolic
(Poincaré) distance given by
`dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))` instead of the induced
Euclidean distance because the hyperbolic distance is invariant under holomorphic automorphisms of
the upper half-plane. However, we ensure that the projection to `TopologicalSpace` is
definitionally equal to the induced topological space structure.
We also prove that a metric ball/closed ball/sphere in Poincaré metric is a Euclidean ball/closed
ball/sphere with another center and radius.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Metric Real Set Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane ComplexConjugate NNReal Topology MatrixGroups
variable {z w : ℍ} {r : ℝ}
namespace UpperHalfPlane
instance : Dist ℍ :=
⟨fun z w => 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))⟩
theorem dist_eq (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im))) :=
rfl
theorem sinh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
sinh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [dist_eq, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (arsinh _) two_ne_zero, sinh_arsinh]
theorem cosh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
cosh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) (conj (w : ℂ)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, cosh_sq', sinh_half_dist, div_pow, div_pow, one_add_div, mul_pow, sq_sqrt]
· congr 1
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, Complex.normSq_sub, Complex.normSq_conj,
Complex.conj_conj, Complex.mul_re, Complex.conj_re, Complex.conj_im, coe_im]
ring
all_goals positivity
theorem tanh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
tanh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w) := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_div_div_comm, div_self, div_one]
positivity
theorem exp_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
exp (dist z w / 2) = (dist (z : ℂ) w + dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sinh_add_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, add_div]
theorem cosh_dist (z w : ℍ) : cosh (dist z w) = 1 + dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_eq, cosh_two_mul, cosh_sq', add_assoc, ← two_mul, sinh_arsinh, div_pow, mul_pow,
sq_sqrt, sq (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left] <;> positivity
theorem sinh_half_dist_add_dist (a b c : ℍ) : sinh ((dist a b + dist b c) / 2) =
(dist (a : ℂ) b * dist (c : ℂ) (conj ↑b) + dist (b : ℂ) c * dist (a : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) /
(2 * √(a.im * c.im) * dist (b : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) := by
simp only [add_div _ _ (2 : ℝ), sinh_add, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_mul_div_comm]
rw [← add_div, Complex.dist_self_conj, coe_im, abs_of_pos b.im_pos, mul_comm (dist (b : ℂ) _),
dist_comm (b : ℂ), Complex.dist_conj_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ _ b.im]
congr 2
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, mul_comm (√a.im), mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_self_sqrt,
mul_comm] <;> exact (im_pos _).le
protected theorem dist_comm (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = dist w z := by
simp only [dist_eq, dist_comm (z : ℂ), mul_comm]
theorem dist_le_iff_le_sinh :
dist z w ≤ r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) ≤ sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (zero_lt_two' ℝ), ← sinh_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) = sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_left_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sinh_inj, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sq_sinh (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (4 * z.im * w.im) = sinh (r / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh, ← sq_eq_sq₀, div_pow, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, mul_assoc]
· norm_num
all_goals positivity
protected theorem dist_triangle (a b c : ℍ) : dist a c ≤ dist a b + dist b c := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist_add_dist, div_mul_eq_div_div _ _ (dist _ _), le_div_iff₀,
div_mul_eq_mul_div]
· gcongr
exact EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist (a : ℂ) b c (conj (b : ℂ))
· rw [dist_comm, dist_pos, Ne, Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact b.im_ne_zero
theorem dist_le_dist_coe_div_sqrt (z w : ℍ) : dist z w ≤ dist (z : ℂ) w / √(z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, ← div_mul_eq_div_div_swap, self_le_sinh_iff]
positivity
/-- An auxiliary `MetricSpace` instance on the upper half-plane. This instance has bad projection
to `TopologicalSpace`. We replace it later. -/
def metricSpaceAux : MetricSpace ℍ where
dist := dist
dist_self z := by rw [dist_eq, dist_self, zero_div, arsinh_zero, mul_zero]
dist_comm := UpperHalfPlane.dist_comm
dist_triangle := UpperHalfPlane.dist_triangle
eq_of_dist_eq_zero {z w} h := by
simpa [dist_eq, Real.sqrt_eq_zero', (mul_pos z.im_pos w.im_pos).not_le, Set.ext_iff] using h
open Complex
theorem cosh_dist' (z w : ℍ) :
Real.cosh (dist z w) = ((z.re - w.re) ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2 + w.im ^ 2) / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
field_simp [cosh_dist, Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply]
ring
/-- Euclidean center of the circle with center `z` and radius `r` in the hyperbolic metric. -/
def center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : ℍ :=
⟨⟨z.re, z.im * Real.cosh r⟩, by positivity⟩
@[simp]
theorem center_re (z r) : (center z r).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_im (z r) : (center z r).im = z.im * Real.cosh r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_zero (z : ℍ) : center z 0 = z :=
ext' rfl <| by rw [center_im, Real.cosh_zero, mul_one]
theorem dist_coe_center_sq (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) ^ 2 =
2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2 := by
have H : 2 * z.im * w.im ≠ 0 := by positivity
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply, coe_re, coe_im, center_re, center_im,
cosh_dist', mul_div_cancel₀ _ H, sub_sq z.im, mul_pow, Real.cosh_sq, sub_re, sub_im, mul_sub, ←
sq]
ring
theorem dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) =
√(2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq dist_nonneg, dist_coe_center_sq]
theorem cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
cmp (dist z w) r = cmp (dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r)) (w.im * Real.sinh r) := by
letI := metricSpaceAux
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with hr₀ | hr₀
· trans Ordering.gt
exacts [(hr₀.trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt,
((mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg w.im_pos (sinh_neg_iff.2 hr₀)).trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt.symm]
have hr₀' : 0 ≤ w.im * Real.sinh r := by positivity
have hzw₀ : 0 < 2 * z.im * w.im := by positivity
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
we need to give Lean the hint `(y := w.im * Real.sinh r)`. -/
simp only [← cosh_strictMonoOn.cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg hr₀,
← (pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ two_ne_zero).cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg (y := w.im * Real.sinh r) hr₀',
dist_coe_center_sq]
rw [← cmp_mul_pos_left hzw₀, ← cmp_sub_zero, ← mul_sub, ← cmp_add_right, zero_add]
theorem dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) = w.im * Real.sinh r :=
eq_iff_eq_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
| @[simp]
theorem dist_self_center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
dist (z : ℂ) (z.center r) = z.im * (Real.cosh r - 1) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Metric.lean | 171 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Functors which preserves homology
If `F : C ⥤ D` is a functor between categories with zero morphisms, we shall
say that `F` preserves homology when `F` preserves both kernels and cokernels.
This typeclass is named `[F.PreservesHomology]`, and is automatically
satisfied when `F` preserves both finite limits and finite colimits.
If `S : ShortComplex C` and `[F.PreservesHomology]`, then there is an
isomorphism `S.mapHomologyIso F : (S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`, which
is part of the natural isomorphism `homologyFunctorIso F` between the functors
`F.mapShortComplex ⋙ homologyFunctor D` and `homologyFunctor C ⋙ F`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
namespace Functor
variable (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor preserves homology when it preserves both kernels and cokernels. -/
class PreservesHomology (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves kernels -/
preservesKernels ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) : PreservesLimit (parallelPair f 0) F := by
infer_instance
/-- the functor preserves cokernels -/
preservesCokernels ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) : PreservesColimit (parallelPair f 0) F := by
infer_instance
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- A functor which preserves homology preserves kernels. -/
lemma PreservesHomology.preservesKernel [F.PreservesHomology] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
PreservesLimit (parallelPair f 0) F :=
PreservesHomology.preservesKernels _
/-- A functor which preserves homology preserves cokernels. -/
lemma PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel [F.PreservesHomology] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
PreservesColimit (parallelPair f 0) F :=
PreservesHomology.preservesCokernels _
noncomputable instance preservesHomologyOfExact
[PreservesFiniteLimits F] [PreservesFiniteColimits F] :
F.PreservesHomology where
end Functor
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A left homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F` is
`F` preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` and the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
class IsPreservedBy [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
g : PreservesLimit (parallelPair S.g 0) F
/-- the functor preserves the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
f' : PreservesColimit (parallelPair h.f' 0) F
variable [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
noncomputable instance isPreservedBy_of_preservesHomology [F.PreservesHomology] :
h.IsPreservedBy F where
g := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesKernel _ _
f' := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel _ _
variable [h.IsPreservedBy F]
include h in
/-- When a left homology data is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hg : PreservesLimit (parallelPair S.g 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a left homology data `h` is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hf' : PreservesColimit (parallelPair h.f' 0) F := IsPreservedBy.f'
/-- When a left homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F`,
this is the induced left homology data `h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def map : (S.map F).LeftHomologyData := by
have := IsPreservedBy.hg h F
have := IsPreservedBy.hf' h F
have wi : F.map h.i ≫ F.map S.g = 0 := by rw [← F.map_comp, h.wi, F.map_zero]
have hi := KernelFork.mapIsLimit _ h.hi F
let f' : F.obj S.X₁ ⟶ F.obj h.K := hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι (S.map F).f (S.map F).zero)
have hf' : f' = F.map h.f' := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hi (by
rw [Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hi]
simp only [KernelFork.map_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, map_f, ← F.map_comp, f'_i])
have wπ : f' ≫ F.map h.π = 0 := by rw [hf', ← F.map_comp, f'_π, F.map_zero]
have hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (F.map h.π) wπ) := by
let e : parallelPair f' 0 ≅ parallelPair (F.map h.f') 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using hf') (by simp)
refine IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv e _
(IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (CokernelCofork.mapIsColimit _ h.hπ' F) ?_)
exact Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [e])
exact
{ K := F.obj h.K
H := F.obj h.H
i := F.map h.i
π := F.map h.π
wi := wi
hi := hi
wπ := wπ
hπ := hπ }
@[simp]
lemma map_f' : (h.map F).f' = F.map h.f' := by
rw [← cancel_mono (h.map F).i, f'_i, map_f, map_i, ← F.map_comp, f'_i]
end LeftHomologyData
/-- Given a left homology map data `ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
both left homology data `h₁` and `h₂` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced left homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} (ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h₁.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.IsPreservedBy F] :
LeftHomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
φK := F.map ψ.φK
φH := F.map ψ.φH
commi := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commi
commf' := by simpa only [LeftHomologyData.map_f', F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commf'
commπ := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commπ
namespace RightHomologyData
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A right homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F` is
`F` preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
class IsPreservedBy [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
f : PreservesColimit (parallelPair S.f 0) F
/-- the functor preserves the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
g' : PreservesLimit (parallelPair h.g' 0) F
variable [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
noncomputable instance isPreservedBy_of_preservesHomology [F.PreservesHomology] :
h.IsPreservedBy F where
f := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel F _
g' := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesKernel F _
variable [h.IsPreservedBy F]
include h in
/-- When a right homology data is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hf : PreservesColimit (parallelPair S.f 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a right homology data `h` is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hg' : PreservesLimit (parallelPair h.g' 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.g' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a right homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F`,
this is the induced right homology data `h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def map : (S.map F).RightHomologyData := by
have := IsPreservedBy.hf h F
have := IsPreservedBy.hg' h F
have wp : F.map S.f ≫ F.map h.p = 0 := by rw [← F.map_comp, h.wp, F.map_zero]
have hp := CokernelCofork.mapIsColimit _ h.hp F
let g' : F.obj h.Q ⟶ F.obj S.X₃ := hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ (S.map F).g (S.map F).zero)
have hg' : g' = F.map h.g' := by
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hp
rw [Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hp]
simp only [Cofork.π_ofπ, CokernelCofork.map_π, map_g, ← F.map_comp, p_g']
have wι : F.map h.ι ≫ g' = 0 := by rw [hg', ← F.map_comp, ι_g', F.map_zero]
have hι : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (F.map h.ι) wι) := by
let e : parallelPair g' 0 ≅ parallelPair (F.map h.g') 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using hg') (by simp)
refine IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv e _
(IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (KernelFork.mapIsLimit _ h.hι' F) ?_)
exact Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [e])
exact
{ Q := F.obj h.Q
H := F.obj h.H
p := F.map h.p
ι := F.map h.ι
wp := wp
hp := hp
wι := wι
hι := hι }
@[simp]
lemma map_g' : (h.map F).g' = F.map h.g' := by
rw [← cancel_epi (h.map F).p, p_g', map_g, map_p, ← F.map_comp, p_g']
end RightHomologyData
/-- Given a right homology map data `ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
both right homology data `h₁` and `h₂` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced right homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} (ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h₁.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.IsPreservedBy F] :
RightHomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
φQ := F.map ψ.φQ
φH := F.map ψ.φH
commp := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commp
commg' := by simpa only [RightHomologyData.map_g', F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commg'
commι := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commι
/-- When a homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is such that both `h.left` and
`h.right` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is the induced homology data
`h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def HomologyData.map (h : S.HomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[h.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
(S.map F).HomologyData where
left := h.left.map F
right := h.right.map F
iso := F.mapIso h.iso
comm := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map h.comm
/-- Given a homology map data `ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
`h₁.left`, `h₁.right`, `h₂.left` and `h₂.right` are all preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def HomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[h₁.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₁.right.IsPreservedBy F]
[h₂.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
HomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
left := ψ.left.map F
right := ψ.right.map F
end ShortComplex
namespace Functor
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A functor preserves the left homology of a short complex `S` if it preserves all the
left homology data of `S`. -/
class PreservesLeftHomologyOf : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves all the left homology data of the short complex -/
isPreservedBy : ∀ (h : S.LeftHomologyData), h.IsPreservedBy F
/-- A functor preserves the right homology of a short complex `S` if it preserves all the
right homology data of `S`. -/
class PreservesRightHomologyOf : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves all the right homology data of the short complex -/
isPreservedBy : ∀ (h : S.RightHomologyData), h.IsPreservedBy F
instance PreservesHomology.preservesLeftHomologyOf [F.PreservesHomology] :
F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S := ⟨inferInstance⟩
instance PreservesHomology.preservesRightHomologyOf [F.PreservesHomology] :
F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S := ⟨inferInstance⟩
variable {S}
/-- If a functor preserves a certain left homology data of a short complex `S`, then it
preserves the left homology of `S`. -/
lemma PreservesLeftHomologyOf.mk' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [h.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S where
isPreservedBy h' :=
{ g := ShortComplex.LeftHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hg h F
f' := by
have := ShortComplex.LeftHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hf' h F
let e : parallelPair h.f' 0 ≅ parallelPair h'.f' 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (ShortComplex.cyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl S) h h')
(by simp) (by simp)
exact preservesColimit_of_iso_diagram F e }
/-- If a functor preserves a certain right homology data of a short complex `S`, then it
preserves the right homology of `S`. -/
lemma PreservesRightHomologyOf.mk' (h : S.RightHomologyData) [h.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S where
isPreservedBy h' :=
{ f := ShortComplex.RightHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hf h F
g' := by
have := ShortComplex.RightHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hg' h F
let e : parallelPair h.g' 0 ≅ parallelPair h'.g' 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (ShortComplex.opcyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl S) h h') (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp)
exact preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram F e }
end Functor
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S : ShortComplex C} (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
instance LeftHomologyData.isPreservedBy_of_preserves [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
h₁.IsPreservedBy F :=
Functor.PreservesLeftHomologyOf.isPreservedBy _
instance RightHomologyData.isPreservedBy_of_preserves [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
h₂.IsPreservedBy F :=
Functor.PreservesRightHomologyOf.isPreservedBy _
variable (S)
instance hasLeftHomology_of_preserves [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (S.leftHomologyData.map F)
instance hasLeftHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasLeftHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
instance hasRightHomology_of_preserves [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (S.rightHomologyData.map F)
instance hasRightHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasRightHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
instance hasHomology_of_preserves [S.HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (S.homologyData.map F)
instance hasHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
section
variable
(hl : S.LeftHomologyData) (hr : S.RightHomologyData)
{S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hl₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (hr₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(hl₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (hr₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
(h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable [hl₁.IsPreservedBy F] [hl₂.IsPreservedBy F]
lemma map_cyclesMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.cyclesMap' φ hl₁ hl₂) =
ShortComplex.cyclesMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hl₁.map F) (hl₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData φ hl₁ hl₂ := default
rw [γ.cyclesMap'_eq, (γ.map F).cyclesMap'_eq, ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData.map_φK]
lemma map_leftHomologyMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.leftHomologyMap' φ hl₁ hl₂) =
ShortComplex.leftHomologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hl₁.map F) (hl₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData φ hl₁ hl₂ := default
rw [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, (γ.map F).leftHomologyMap'_eq,
ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData.map_φH]
end LeftHomologyData
namespace RightHomologyData
variable [hr₁.IsPreservedBy F] [hr₂.IsPreservedBy F]
lemma map_opcyclesMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.opcyclesMap' φ hr₁ hr₂) =
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hr₁.map F) (hr₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData φ hr₁ hr₂ := default
rw [γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, (γ.map F).opcyclesMap'_eq, ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData.map_φQ]
lemma map_rightHomologyMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.rightHomologyMap' φ hr₁ hr₂) =
ShortComplex.rightHomologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hr₁.map F) (hr₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData φ hr₁ hr₂ := default
rw [γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, (γ.map F).rightHomologyMap'_eq,
ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData.map_φH]
end RightHomologyData
lemma HomologyData.map_homologyMap'
[h₁.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₁.right.IsPreservedBy F]
[h₂.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.map (ShortComplex.homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) =
ShortComplex.homologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) :=
LeftHomologyData.map_leftHomologyMap' _ _ _ _
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).cycles ≅ F.obj S.cycles`. -/
noncomputable def mapCyclesIso [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).cycles ≅ F.obj S.cycles :=
(S.leftHomologyData.map F).cyclesIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapCyclesIso_hom_iCycles [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.mapCyclesIso F).hom ≫ F.map S.iCycles = (S.map F).iCycles := by
apply LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).leftHomology ≅ F.obj S.leftHomology`. -/
noncomputable def mapLeftHomologyIso [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).leftHomology ≅ F.obj S.leftHomology :=
(S.leftHomologyData.map F).leftHomologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).opcycles ≅ F.obj S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def mapOpcyclesIso [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).opcycles ≅ F.obj S.opcycles :=
(S.rightHomologyData.map F).opcyclesIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).rightHomology ≅ F.obj S.rightHomology`. -/
noncomputable def mapRightHomologyIso [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).rightHomology ≅ F.obj S.rightHomology :=
(S.rightHomologyData.map F).rightHomologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def mapHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] [(S.map F).HasHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology :=
(S.homologyData.left.map F).homologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def mapHomologyIso' [S.HasHomology] [(S.map F).HasHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology :=
(S.homologyData.right.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso S.homologyData.right.homologyIso.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapCyclesIso_eq [S.HasLeftHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapCyclesIso F = (hl.map F).cyclesIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.cyclesIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapCyclesIso, cyclesIso]
simp only [map_cyclesMap', ← cyclesMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapLeftHomologyIso_eq [S.HasLeftHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapLeftHomologyIso F = (hl.map F).leftHomologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.leftHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapLeftHomologyIso, leftHomologyIso]
simp only [map_leftHomologyMap', ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapOpcyclesIso_eq [S.HasRightHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapOpcyclesIso F = (hr.map F).opcyclesIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hr.opcyclesIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapOpcyclesIso, opcyclesIso]
simp only [map_opcyclesMap', ← opcyclesMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapRightHomologyIso_eq [S.HasRightHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapRightHomologyIso F = (hr.map F).rightHomologyIso ≪≫
F.mapIso hr.rightHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapRightHomologyIso, rightHomologyIso]
simp only [map_rightHomologyMap', ← rightHomologyMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapHomologyIso_eq [S.HasHomology]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapHomologyIso F = (hl.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.homologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp only [mapHomologyIso, homologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso,
leftHomologyMapIso', leftHomologyIso, Functor.mapIso,
Iso.symm, Iso.trans, Iso.refl]
simp only [F.map_comp, map_leftHomologyMap', ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id,
| Functor.map_id, Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapHomologyIso'_eq [S.HasHomology]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapHomologyIso' F = (hr.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hr.homologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp only [Iso.trans, Iso.symm, Iso.refl, Functor.mapIso, mapHomologyIso', homologyIso,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/PreservesHomology.lean | 485 | 491 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
/-- The directed sUnion of a set S of preconnected subsets is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
/-- Preconnectedness of the iUnion of a family of preconnected sets
indexed by the vertices of a preconnected graph,
where two vertices are joined when the corresponding sets intersect. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
section SuccOrder
open Order
variable [LinearOrder β] [SuccOrder β] [IsSuccArchimedean β]
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is connected. -/
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_chain [Nonempty β] {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of preconnected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (ht : OrdConnected t)
(H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
have h1 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj (Ico_subset_Icc_self hk)
have h2 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → succ k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj ⟨hk.1.trans <| le_succ _, succ_le_of_lt hk.2⟩
have h3 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → (s k ∩ s (succ k)).Nonempty :=
fun hi hj hk => K _ (h1 hi hj hk) (h2 hi hj hk)
refine IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun i hi j hj => ?_
exact reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun k hk => ⟨h3 hi hj hk, h1 hi hj hk⟩) fun k hk =>
⟨by rw [inter_comm]; exact h3 hj hi hk, h2 hj hi hk⟩
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (hnt : t.Nonempty)
(ht : OrdConnected t) (H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨hnt.some, hnt.some_mem, (H _ hnt.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain ht (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
end SuccOrder
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a preconnected set and its closure, then it is
preconnected as well. See also `IsConnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a connected set and its closure, then it is
connected as well. See also `IsPreconnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
/-- The closure of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
/-- The closure of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
/-- The image of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
/-- The image of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPreconnected_image := IsInducing.isPreconnected_image
/- TODO: The following lemmas about connection of preimages hold more generally for strict maps
(the quotient and subspace topologies of the image agree) whose fibers are preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) := fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f)
(hsf : s ⊆ range f) : IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2 fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_or_subset (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v) (huv : Disjoint u v)
(hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hs : IsPreconnected s) : s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v := by
specialize hs u v hu hv hsuv
obtain hsu | hsu := (s ∩ u).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Or.inr ((Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.2 hsu).subset_right_of_subset_union hsuv)
· replace hs := mt (hs hsu)
simp_rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 huv] at hs
exact Or.inl ((hs s.disjoint_empty).subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_left_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsu : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ u :=
Disjoint.subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv
(by
by_contra hsv
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] at hsv
obtain ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := hs u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 huv hx)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_right_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsv : (s ∩ v).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ v :=
hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hv hu huv.symm (union_comm u v ▸ hsuv) hsv
/-- If a preconnected set `s` intersects an open set `u`, and limit points of `u` inside `s` are
contained in `u`, then the whole set `s` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_of_closure_inter_subset (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hu : IsOpen u)
(h'u : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (h : closure u ∩ s ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u := by
have A : s ⊆ u ∪ (closure u)ᶜ := by
intro x hx
by_cases xu : x ∈ u
· exact Or.inl xu
· right
intro h'x
exact xu (h (mem_inter h'x hx))
apply hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hu isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl _ A h'u
exact disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure)
theorem IsPreconnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ×ˢ t) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Prod.mk a₁ '' t ∪ flip Prod.mk b₂ '' s, ?_, .inl ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩, .inr ⟨a₂, ha₂, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro _ (⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ | ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨ha₁, hy⟩, ⟨hx, hb₂⟩]
· exact (ht.image _ (by fun_prop)).union (a₁, b₂) ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩
⟨a₁, ha₁, rfl⟩ (hs.image _ (Continuous.prodMk_left _).continuousOn)
theorem IsConnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
(ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ×ˢ t) :=
⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
theorem isPreconnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)}
(hs : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (pi univ s) := by
rintro u v uo vo hsuv ⟨f, hfs, hfu⟩ ⟨g, hgs, hgv⟩
classical
rcases exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds hfu) g with ⟨I, hI⟩
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty =>
refine ⟨g, hgs, ⟨?_, hgv⟩⟩
simpa using hI
| insert i I _ ihI =>
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert] at hI
have := I.piecewise_mem_set_pi hfs hgs
refine (hsuv this).elim ihI fun h => ?_
set S := update (I.piecewise f g) i '' s i
have hsub : S ⊆ pi univ s := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun z hz => ?_
rwa [update_preimage_univ_pi]
exact fun j _ => this j trivial
have hconn : IsPreconnected S :=
(hs i).image _ (continuous_const.update i continuous_id).continuousOn
have hSu : (S ∩ u).Nonempty := ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (hfs _ trivial), hI⟩
have hSv : (S ∩ v).Nonempty := ⟨_, ⟨_, this _ trivial, update_eq_self _ _⟩, h⟩
refine (hconn u v uo vo (hsub.trans hsuv) hSu hSv).mono ?_
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hsub
@[simp]
theorem isConnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
IsConnected (pi univ s) ↔ ∀ i, IsConnected (s i) := by
simp only [IsConnected, ← univ_pi_nonempty_iff, forall_and, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun hne => ⟨fun hc i => ?_, isPreconnected_univ_pi⟩
rw [← eval_image_univ_pi hne]
exact hc.image _ (continuous_apply _).continuousOn
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connectedComponent (x : α) : Set α :=
⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsPreconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
open Classical in
/-- Given a set `F` in a topological space `α` and a point `x : α`, the connected
component of `x` in `F` is the connected component of `x` in the subtype `F` seen as
a set in `α`. This definition does not make sense if `x` is not in `F` so we return the
empty set in this case. -/
def connectedComponentIn (F : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
if h : x ∈ F then (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) else ∅
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_image {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) :=
dif_pos h
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_empty {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = ∅ :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_connectedComponent {x : α} : x ∈ connectedComponent x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨isPreconnected_singleton, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem mem_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hx : x ∈ F) :
x ∈ connectedComponentIn F x := by
simp [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, mem_connectedComponent, hx]
theorem connectedComponent_nonempty {x : α} : (connectedComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
(connectedComponentIn F x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp [connectedComponent_nonempty, *]
theorem connectedComponentIn_subset (F : Set α) (x : α) : connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsPreconnected (connectedComponent x) :=
isPreconnected_sUnion x _ (fun _ => And.right) fun _ => And.left
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsPreconnected (connectedComponentIn F x) := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]; split_ifs
· exact IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mpr isPreconnected_connectedComponent
· exact isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsConnected (connectedComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩, isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
theorem isConnected_connectedComponentIn_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsConnected (connectedComponentIn F x) ↔ x ∈ F := by
simp_rw [← connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff, IsConnected, isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn,
and_true]
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsPreconnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x := fun _z hz => mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ connectedComponentIn F x := by
have : IsPreconnected (((↑) : F → α) ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mp ?_
rwa [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
have h2xs : (⟨x, hsF hxs⟩ : F) ∈ (↑) ⁻¹' s := by
rw [mem_preimage]
exact hxs
have := this.subset_connectedComponent h2xs
rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image (hsF hxs)]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset _ this)
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
theorem IsConnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsConnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
H1.2.subset_connectedComponent H2
theorem IsPreconnected.connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected F)
(hx : x ∈ F) : connectedComponentIn F x = F :=
(connectedComponentIn_subset F x).antisymm (h.subset_connectedComponentIn hx subset_rfl)
theorem connectedComponent_eq {x y : α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponent x) :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent
(Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset mem_connectedComponent
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)))
theorem connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem {x y : α} :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y ↔ x ∈ connectedComponent y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_connectedComponent, fun h => (connectedComponent_eq h).symm⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq {x y : α} {F : Set α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponentIn F x) :
connectedComponentIn F x = connectedComponentIn F y := by
have hx : x ∈ F := connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff.mp ⟨y, h⟩
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, h2y, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hy, connectedComponent_eq h2y]
theorem connectedComponentIn_univ (x : α) : connectedComponentIn univ x = connectedComponent x :=
subset_antisymm
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.subset_connectedComponent <|
mem_connectedComponentIn trivial)
(isPreconnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponentIn mem_connectedComponent <|
subset_univ _)
theorem connectedComponent_disjoint {x y : α} (h : connectedComponent x ≠ connectedComponent y) :
Disjoint (connectedComponent x) (connectedComponent y) :=
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 =>
h ((connectedComponent_eq h1).trans (connectedComponent_eq h2).symm)
theorem isClosed_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsClosed (connectedComponent x) :=
closure_subset_iff_isClosed.1 <|
isConnected_connectedComponent.closure.subset_connectedComponent <|
subset_closure mem_connectedComponent
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) (a : α) : f '' connectedComponent a ⊆ connectedComponent (f a) :=
(isConnected_connectedComponent.image f h.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponent
((mem_image f (connectedComponent a) (f a)).2 ⟨a, mem_connectedComponent, rfl⟩)
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponentIn_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
{a : α} (hf : Continuous f) (hx : a ∈ s) :
f '' connectedComponentIn s a ⊆ connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a) :=
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.image _ hf.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponentIn
(mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_connectedComponentIn hx)
(image_subset _ <| connectedComponentIn_subset _ _)
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponent [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f)
(a : α) : MapsTo f (connectedComponent a) (connectedComponent (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| h.image_connectedComponent_subset a
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponentIn [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : Continuous f) {a : α} (hx : a ∈ s) :
MapsTo f (connectedComponentIn s a) (connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| image_connectedComponentIn_subset h hx
theorem irreducibleComponent_subset_connectedComponent {x : α} :
irreducibleComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent.isConnected.subset_connectedComponent mem_irreducibleComponent
@[mono]
theorem connectedComponentIn_mono (x : α) {F G : Set α} (h : F ⊆ G) :
connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ connectedComponentIn G x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ F
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, connectedComponentIn_eq_image (h hx), ←
show ((↑) : G → α) ∘ inclusion h = (↑) from rfl, image_comp]
exact image_subset _ ((continuous_inclusion h).image_connectedComponent_subset ⟨x, hx⟩)
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_empty hx]
exact Set.empty_subset _
/-- A preconnected space is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class PreconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The universal set `Set.univ` in a preconnected space is a preconnected set. -/
isPreconnected_univ : IsPreconnected (univ : Set α)
export PreconnectedSpace (isPreconnected_univ)
/-- A connected space is a nonempty one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class ConnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop extends PreconnectedSpace α where
/-- A connected space is nonempty. -/
toNonempty : Nonempty α
attribute [instance 50] ConnectedSpace.toNonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
theorem isConnected_univ [ConnectedSpace α] : IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨univ_nonempty, isPreconnected_univ⟩
lemma preconnectedSpace_iff_univ : PreconnectedSpace α ↔ IsPreconnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
| lemma connectedSpace_iff_univ : ConnectedSpace α ↔ IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨univ_nonempty, h.1.1⟩,
fun h ↦ ConnectedSpace.mk (toPreconnectedSpace := ⟨h.2⟩) ⟨h.1.some⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 631 | 634 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Leonardo de Moura. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Notation
/-!
# Functoriality of `Set`
This file defines the functor structure of `Set`.
-/
universe u
open Function Set.Notation
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type u} {s : Set α} {f : α → Set β}
/-- The `Set` functor is a monad.
This is not a global instance because it does not have computational content,
so it does not make much sense using `do` notation in general.
Plus, this would cause monad-related coercions and monad lifting logic to become activated.
Either use `attribute [local instance] Set.monad` to make it be a local instance
or use `SetM.run do ...` when `do` notation is wanted. -/
protected def monad : Monad.{u} Set where
pure a := {a}
bind s f := ⋃ i ∈ s, f i
seq s t := Set.seq s (t ())
map := Set.image
section with_instance
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
@[simp]
theorem bind_def : s >>= f = ⋃ i ∈ s, f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fmap_eq_image (f : α → β) : f <$> s = f '' s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem seq_eq_set_seq (s : Set (α → β)) (t : Set α) : s <*> t = s.seq t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a : α) : (pure a : Set α) = {a} :=
rfl
/-- `Set.image2` in terms of monadic operations. Note that this can't be taken as the definition
because of the lack of universe polymorphism. -/
theorem image2_def {α β γ : Type u} (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f s t = f <$> s <*> t := by
ext
simp
instance : LawfulMonad Set := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := image_id)
(pure_bind := biUnion_singleton)
(bind_assoc := fun _ _ _ => by simp only [bind_def, biUnion_iUnion])
(bind_pure_comp := fun _ _ => (image_eq_iUnion _ _).symm)
(bind_map := fun _ _ => seq_def.symm)
instance : CommApplicative (Set : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨fun s t => prod_image_seq_comm s t⟩
instance : Alternative Set :=
{ Set.monad with
orElse := fun s t => s ∪ (t ())
failure := ∅ }
/-! ### Monadic coercion lemmas -/
variable {β : Set α} {γ : Set β}
theorem mem_coe_of_mem {a : α} (ha : a ∈ β) (ha' : ⟨a, ha⟩ ∈ γ) : a ∈ (γ : Set α) :=
⟨_, ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _, ⟨ha', rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem coe_subset : (γ : Set α) ⊆ β := by
intro _ ⟨_, ⟨⟨⟨_, ha⟩, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩⟩; convert ha
theorem mem_of_mem_coe {a : α} (ha : a ∈ (γ : Set α)) : ⟨a, coe_subset ha⟩ ∈ γ := by
rcases ha with ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, ⟨ha, rfl⟩, _⟩; convert ha
theorem eq_univ_of_coe_eq (hγ : (γ : Set α) = β) : γ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun ⟨_, ha⟩ => mem_of_mem_coe <| hγ.symm ▸ ha
theorem image_coe_eq_restrict_image {δ : Type*} {f : α → δ} : f '' γ = β.restrict f '' γ :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, h, ha⟩ => ⟨_, mem_of_mem_coe h, ha⟩, fun ⟨_, h, ha⟩ => ⟨_, mem_coe_of_mem _ h, ha⟩⟩
end with_instance
/-! ### Coercion applying functoriality for `Subtype.val`
The `Monad` instance gives a coercion using the internal function `Lean.Internal.coeM`.
In practice this is only used for applying the `Set` functor to `Subtype.val`,
as was defined in `Data.Set.Notation`. -/
/-- The coercion from `Set.monad` as an instance is equal to the coercion in `Data.Set.Notation`. -/
theorem coe_eq_image_val (t : Set s) :
@Lean.Internal.coeM Set s α _ Set.monad t = (t : Set α) := by
change ⋃ (x ∈ t), {x.1} = _
ext
simp
variable {β : Set α} {γ : Set β} {a : α}
theorem mem_image_val_of_mem (ha : a ∈ β) (ha' : ⟨a, ha⟩ ∈ γ) : a ∈ (γ : Set α) :=
⟨_, ha', rfl⟩
theorem image_val_subset : (γ : Set α) ⊆ β := by
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, _, rfl⟩; exact ha
theorem mem_of_mem_image_val (ha : a ∈ (γ : Set α)) : ⟨a, image_val_subset ha⟩ ∈ γ := by
rcases ha with ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩; exact ha
theorem eq_univ_of_image_val_eq (hγ : (γ : Set α) = β) : γ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun ⟨_, ha⟩ => mem_of_mem_image_val <| hγ.symm ▸ ha
theorem image_image_val_eq_restrict_image {δ : Type*} {f : α → δ} : f '' γ = β.restrict f '' γ := by
ext; simp
end Set
/-! ### Wrapper to enable the `Set` monad -/
| /-- This is `Set` but with a `Monad` instance. -/
def SetM (α : Type u) := Set α
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Functor.lean | 134 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ModularLattice
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
/-!
# Atoms, Coatoms, and Simple Lattices
This module defines atoms, which are minimal non-`⊥` elements in bounded lattices, simple lattices,
which are lattices with only two elements, and related ideas.
## Main definitions
### Atoms and Coatoms
* `IsAtom a` indicates that the only element below `a` is `⊥`.
* `IsCoatom a` indicates that the only element above `a` is `⊤`.
### Atomic and Atomistic Lattices
* `IsAtomic` indicates that every element other than `⊥` is above an atom.
* `IsCoatomic` indicates that every element other than `⊤` is below a coatom.
* `IsAtomistic` indicates that every element is the `sSup` of a set of atoms.
* `IsCoatomistic` indicates that every element is the `sInf` of a set of coatoms.
* `IsStronglyAtomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ⋖ x ≤ b`.
* `IsStronglyCoatomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ≤ x ⋖ b`.
### Simple Lattices
* `IsSimpleOrder` indicates that an order has only two unique elements, `⊥` and `⊤`.
* `IsSimpleOrder.boundedOrder`
* `IsSimpleOrder.distribLattice`
* Given an instance of `IsSimpleOrder`, we provide the following definitions. These are not
made global instances as they contain data :
* `IsSimpleOrder.booleanAlgebra`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeLattice`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeBooleanAlgebra`
## Main results
* `isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom` and `isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom` express the (definitional) duality
of `IsAtom` and `IsCoatom`.
* `isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top` and `isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot` express the
connection between atoms, coatoms, and simple lattices
* `IsCompl.isAtom_iff_isCoatom` and `IsCompl.isCoatom_if_isAtom`: In a modular
bounded lattice, a complement of an atom is a coatom and vice versa.
* `isAtomic_iff_isCoatomic`: A modular complemented lattice is atomic iff it is coatomic.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
section Atoms
section IsAtom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
/-- An atom of an `OrderBot` is an element with no other element between it and `⊥`,
which is not `⊥`. -/
def IsAtom (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b, b < a → b = ⊥
theorem IsAtom.Iic (ha : IsAtom a) (hax : a ≤ x) : IsAtom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 con), fun ⟨b, _⟩ hba => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (ha.2 b hba)⟩
theorem IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic {a : Set.Iic x} (ha : IsAtom a) : IsAtom (a : α) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.ext con), fun b hba =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (ha.2 ⟨b, hba.le.trans a.prop⟩ hba)⟩
theorem isAtom_iff_le_of_ge : IsAtom a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊥, b ≤ a → a ≤ b :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
forall_congr' fun b => by
simp only [Ne, @not_imp_comm (b = ⊥), Classical.not_imp, lt_iff_le_not_le]
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsAtom.lt_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x < a ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨h.2 x, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h.1.bot_lt⟩
theorem IsAtom.le_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x ≤ a ↔ x = ⊥ ∨ x = a := by rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, h.lt_iff]
lemma IsAtom.bot_lt (h : IsAtom a) : ⊥ < a :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsAtom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsAtom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
ha.le_iff.trans <| or_iff_right hb
theorem IsAtom.Iic_eq (h : IsAtom a) : Set.Iic a = {⊥, a} :=
Set.ext fun _ => h.le_iff
@[simp]
theorem bot_covBy_iff : ⊥ ⋖ a ↔ IsAtom a := by
simp only [CovBy, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, IsAtom, not_imp_not]
alias ⟨CovBy.is_atom, IsAtom.bot_covBy⟩ := bot_covBy_iff
end PartialOrder
theorem atom_le_iSup [Order.Frame α] {a : α} (ha : IsAtom a) {f : ι → α} :
a ≤ iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => le_trans hi (le_iSup _ _)⟩
show (a ≤ ⨆ i, f i) → _
refine fun h => of_not_not fun ha' => ?_
push_neg at ha'
have ha'' : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff.2 fun i => fun x hxa hxf => le_bot_iff.2 <| of_not_not fun hx =>
have hxa : x < a := (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hxa).resolve_left (by rintro rfl; exact ha' _ hxf)
hx (ha.2 _ hxa)
obtain rfl := le_bot_iff.1 (ha'' le_rfl h)
exact ha.1 rfl
end IsAtom
section IsCoatom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A coatom of an `OrderTop` is an element with no other element between it and `⊤`,
which is not `⊤`. -/
def IsCoatom [OrderTop α] (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b, a < b → b = ⊤
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom [OrderBot α] {a : α} :
IsCoatom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom [OrderTop α] {a : α} :
IsAtom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsAtom.dual⟩ := isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom
alias ⟨_, IsCoatom.dual⟩ := isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom
variable [OrderTop α] {a x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.Ici (ha : IsCoatom a) (hax : x ≤ a) : IsCoatom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Ici x) :=
ha.dual.Iic hax
theorem IsCoatom.of_isCoatom_coe_Ici {a : Set.Ici x} (ha : IsCoatom a) : IsCoatom (a : α) :=
@IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ x a ha
theorem isCoatom_iff_ge_of_le : IsCoatom a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊤, a ≤ b → b ≤ a :=
isAtom_iff_le_of_ge (α := αᵒᵈ)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.lt_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a < x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem IsCoatom.le_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ ∨ x = a :=
h.dual.le_iff
lemma IsCoatom.lt_top (h : IsCoatom a) : a < ⊤ :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsCoatom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsCoatom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a ≤ b ↔ b = a := ha.dual.le_iff_eq hb
theorem IsCoatom.Ici_eq (h : IsCoatom a) : Set.Ici a = {⊤, a} :=
h.dual.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem covBy_top_iff : a ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsCoatom a :=
toDual_covBy_toDual_iff.symm.trans bot_covBy_iff
alias ⟨CovBy.isCoatom, IsCoatom.covBy_top⟩ := covBy_top_iff
namespace SetLike
variable {A B : Type*} [SetLike A B]
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot A] {K : A} :
IsAtom K ↔ K ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ H g, H ≤ K → g ∉ H → g ∈ K → H = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [IsAtom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop A] {K : A} :
IsCoatom K ↔ K ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [IsCoatom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem covBy_iff {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = L := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, and_comm, implies_true]
/-- Dual variant of `SetLike.covBy_iff` -/
theorem covBy_iff' {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ H → g ∈ L → H = K := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_not_le, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, ne_comm, implies_true]
end SetLike
end PartialOrder
theorem iInf_le_coatom [Order.Coframe α] {a : α} (ha : IsCoatom a) {f : ι → α} :
iInf f ≤ a ↔ ∃ i, f i ≤ a :=
atom_le_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
end IsCoatom
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem Set.Ici.isAtom_iff {b : Set.Ici a} : IsAtom b ↔ a ⋖ b := by
rw [← bot_covBy_iff]
refine (Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderEmbedding.subtype fun c => a ≤ c) ?_).symm
simpa only [OrderEmbedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using Set.ordConnected_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Set.Iic.isCoatom_iff {a : Set.Iic b} : IsCoatom a ↔ ↑a ⋖ b := by
rw [← covBy_top_iff]
refine (Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderEmbedding.subtype fun c => c ≤ b) ?_).symm
simpa only [OrderEmbedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using Set.ordConnected_Iic
theorem covBy_iff_atom_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : a ⋖ b ↔ IsAtom (⟨b, h⟩ : Set.Ici a) := by simp
theorem covBy_iff_coatom_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : a ⋖ b ↔ IsCoatom (⟨a, h⟩ : Set.Iic b) := by simp
end PartialOrder
section Pairwise
theorem IsAtom.inf_eq_bot_of_ne [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} (ha : IsAtom a)
(hb : IsAtom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
hab.not_le_or_not_le.elim (ha.lt_iff.1 ∘ inf_lt_left.2) (hb.lt_iff.1 ∘ inf_lt_right.2)
theorem IsAtom.disjoint_of_ne [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} (ha : IsAtom a)
(hb : IsAtom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : Disjoint a b :=
disjoint_iff.mpr (ha.inf_eq_bot_of_ne hb hab)
theorem IsCoatom.sup_eq_top_of_ne [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} (ha : IsCoatom a)
(hb : IsCoatom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = ⊤ :=
ha.dual.inf_eq_bot_of_ne hb.dual hab
theorem IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} (ha : IsCoatom a)
(hb : IsCoatom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : Codisjoint a b :=
codisjoint_iff.mpr (ha.sup_eq_top_of_ne hb hab)
end Pairwise
end Atoms
section Atomic
variable [PartialOrder α] (α)
/-- A lattice is atomic iff every element other than `⊥` has an atom below it. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsAtomic [OrderBot α] : Prop where
/-- Every element other than `⊥` has an atom below it. -/
eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le : ∀ b : α, b = ⊥ ∨ ∃ a : α, IsAtom a ∧ a ≤ b
/-- A lattice is coatomic iff every element other than `⊤` has a coatom above it. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCoatomic [OrderTop α] : Prop where
/-- Every element other than `⊤` has an atom above it. -/
eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom : ∀ b : α, b = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a : α, IsCoatom a ∧ b ≤ a
export IsAtomic (eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le)
export IsCoatomic (eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom)
lemma IsAtomic.exists_atom [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α] [IsAtomic α] : ∃ a : α, IsAtom a :=
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_ne (⊥ : α)
have ⟨a, ha⟩ := (eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le b).resolve_left hb
⟨a, ha.1⟩
lemma IsCoatomic.exists_coatom [OrderTop α] [Nontrivial α] [IsCoatomic α] : ∃ a : α, IsCoatom a :=
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_ne (⊤ : α)
have ⟨a, ha⟩ := (eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom b).resolve_left hb
⟨a, ha.1⟩
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic [OrderBot α] : IsCoatomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsAtomic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic [OrderTop α] : IsAtomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsCoatomic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom⟩⟩
namespace IsAtomic
variable [OrderBot α] [IsAtomic α]
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsCoatomic : IsCoatomic αᵒᵈ :=
isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic.2 ‹IsAtomic α›
instance Set.Iic.isAtomic {x : α} : IsAtomic (Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le y).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 fun ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, hay.trans hy⟩, ha.Iic (hay.trans hy), hay⟩⟩
end IsAtomic
namespace IsCoatomic
variable [OrderTop α] [IsCoatomic α]
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsAtomic : IsAtomic αᵒᵈ :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.2 ‹IsCoatomic α›
instance Set.Ici.isCoatomic {x : α} : IsCoatomic (Set.Ici x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom y).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 fun ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, le_trans hy hay⟩, ha.Ici (le_trans hy hay), hay⟩⟩
end IsCoatomic
theorem isAtomic_iff_forall_isAtomic_Iic [OrderBot α] :
IsAtomic α ↔ ∀ x : α, IsAtomic (Set.Iic x) :=
⟨@IsAtomic.Set.Iic.isAtomic _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun x =>
((@eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le _ _ _ (h x)) (⊤ : Set.Iic x)).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1
(Exists.imp' (↑) fun ⟨_, _⟩ => And.imp_left IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic)⟩⟩
theorem isCoatomic_iff_forall_isCoatomic_Ici [OrderTop α] :
IsCoatomic α ↔ ∀ x : α, IsCoatomic (Set.Ici x) :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.symm.trans <|
isAtomic_iff_forall_isAtomic_Iic.trans <|
forall_congr' fun _ => isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic.symm.trans Iff.rfl
section StronglyAtomic
variable {α : Type*} {a b : α} [Preorder α]
/-- An order is strongly atomic if every nontrivial interval `[a, b]`
contains an element covering `a`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsStronglyAtomic (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Prop where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt : ∀ (a b : α), a < b → ∃ x, a ⋖ x ∧ x ≤ b
theorem exists_covBy_le_of_lt [IsStronglyAtomic α] (h : a < b) : ∃ x, a ⋖ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
IsStronglyAtomic.exists_covBy_le_of_lt a b h
alias LT.lt.exists_covby_le := exists_covBy_le_of_lt
/-- An order is strongly coatomic if every nontrivial interval `[a, b]`
contains an element covered by `b`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsStronglyCoatomic (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Prop where
(exists_le_covBy_of_lt : ∀ (a b : α), a < b → ∃ x, a ≤ x ∧ x ⋖ b)
theorem exists_le_covBy_of_lt [IsStronglyCoatomic α] (h : a < b) : ∃ x, a ≤ x ∧ x ⋖ b :=
IsStronglyCoatomic.exists_le_covBy_of_lt a b h
alias LT.lt.exists_le_covby := exists_le_covBy_of_lt
theorem isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic :
IsStronglyAtomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsStronglyCoatomic α := by
simpa [isStronglyAtomic_iff, OrderDual.exists, OrderDual.forall,
OrderDual.toDual_le_toDual, and_comm, isStronglyCoatomic_iff] using forall_comm
@[simp] theorem isStronglyCoatomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyAtomic :
IsStronglyCoatomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsStronglyAtomic α := by
rw [← isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instIsStronglyCoatomic [IsStronglyAtomic α] : IsStronglyCoatomic αᵒᵈ := by
rwa [isStronglyCoatomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyAtomic]
instance [IsStronglyCoatomic α] : IsStronglyAtomic αᵒᵈ := by
rwa [isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]
instance IsStronglyAtomic.isAtomic (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] [IsStronglyAtomic α] :
IsAtomic α where
eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le a := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
refine fun hlt ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ := hlt.exists_covby_le
exact ⟨x, bot_covBy_iff.1 hx, hxa⟩
instance IsStronglyCoatomic.toIsCoatomic (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α]
[IsStronglyCoatomic α] : IsCoatomic α :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.1 <| IsStronglyAtomic.isAtomic (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyAtomic [IsStronglyAtomic α] {s : Set α}
(h : Set.OrdConnected s) : IsStronglyAtomic s where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ hcd
obtain ⟨x, hcx, hxd⟩ := (Subtype.mk_lt_mk.1 hcd).exists_covby_le
exact ⟨⟨x, h.out' hc hd ⟨hcx.le, hxd⟩⟩,
⟨by simpa using hcx.lt, fun y hy hy' ↦ hcx.2 (by simpa using hy) (by simpa using hy')⟩, hxd⟩
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyCoatomic [IsStronglyCoatomic α] {s : Set α}
(h : Set.OrdConnected s) : IsStronglyCoatomic s :=
isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic.1 h.dual.isStronglyAtomic
instance [IsStronglyAtomic α] {s : Set α} [Set.OrdConnected s] : IsStronglyAtomic s :=
Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyAtomic <| by assumption
instance [IsStronglyCoatomic α] {s : Set α} [h : Set.OrdConnected s] : IsStronglyCoatomic s :=
Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyCoatomic <| by assumption
instance SuccOrder.toIsStronglyAtomic [SuccOrder α] : IsStronglyAtomic α where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt a _ hab :=
⟨SuccOrder.succ a, Order.covBy_succ_of_not_isMax fun ha ↦ ha.not_lt hab,
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt hab⟩
instance [PredOrder α] : IsStronglyCoatomic α := by
rw [← isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]; infer_instance
end StronglyAtomic
section WellFounded
theorem IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt (h : WellFounded ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop)) :
IsStronglyAtomic α where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt a b hab := by
refine ⟨WellFounded.min h (Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩, ?_⟩
have hmem := (WellFounded.min_mem h (Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩)
exact ⟨⟨hmem.1,fun c hac hlt ↦ WellFounded.not_lt_min h
(Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩ ⟨hac, hlt.le.trans hmem.2⟩ hlt ⟩, hmem.2⟩
theorem IsStronglyCoatomic.of_wellFounded_gt (h : WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop)) :
IsStronglyCoatomic α :=
isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic.1 <| IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt (α := αᵒᵈ) h
instance [WellFoundedLT α] : IsStronglyAtomic α :=
IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt wellFounded_lt
instance [WellFoundedGT α] : IsStronglyCoatomic α :=
IsStronglyCoatomic.of_wellFounded_gt wellFounded_gt
theorem isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt [OrderBot α]
(h : WellFounded ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop)) : IsAtomic α :=
(IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt h).isAtomic
| theorem isCoatomic_of_orderTop_gt_wellFounded [OrderTop α]
(h : WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop)) : IsCoatomic α :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.1 (@isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ h)
| Mathlib/Order/Atoms.lean | 460 | 462 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Order homomorphisms
This file defines order homomorphisms, which are bundled monotone functions. A preorder
homomorphism `f : α →o β` is a function `α → β` along with a proof that `∀ x y, x ≤ y → f x ≤ f y`.
## Main definitions
In this file we define the following bundled monotone maps:
* `OrderHom α β` a.k.a. `α →o β`: Preorder homomorphism.
An `OrderHom α β` is a function `f : α → β` such that `a₁ ≤ a₂ → f a₁ ≤ f a₂`
* `OrderEmbedding α β` a.k.a. `α ↪o β`: Relation embedding.
An `OrderEmbedding α β` is an embedding `f : α ↪ β` such that `a ≤ b ↔ f a ≤ f b`.
Defined as an abbreviation of `@RelEmbedding α β (≤) (≤)`.
* `OrderIso`: Relation isomorphism.
An `OrderIso α β` is an equivalence `f : α ≃ β` such that `a ≤ b ↔ f a ≤ f b`.
Defined as an abbreviation of `@RelIso α β (≤) (≤)`.
We also define many `OrderHom`s. In some cases we define two versions, one with `ₘ` suffix and
one without it (e.g., `OrderHom.compₘ` and `OrderHom.comp`). This means that the former
function is a "more bundled" version of the latter. We can't just drop the "less bundled" version
because the more bundled version usually does not work with dot notation.
* `OrderHom.id`: identity map as `α →o α`;
* `OrderHom.curry`: an order isomorphism between `α × β →o γ` and `α →o β →o γ`;
* `OrderHom.comp`: composition of two bundled monotone maps;
* `OrderHom.compₘ`: composition of bundled monotone maps as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.const`: constant function as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.prod`: combine `α →o β` and `α →o γ` into `α →o β × γ`;
* `OrderHom.prodₘ`: a more bundled version of `OrderHom.prod`;
* `OrderHom.prodIso`: order isomorphism between `α →o β × γ` and `(α →o β) × (α →o γ)`;
* `OrderHom.diag`: diagonal embedding of `α` into `α × α` as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.onDiag`: restrict a monotone map `α →o α →o β` to the diagonal;
* `OrderHom.fst`: projection `Prod.fst : α × β → α` as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.snd`: projection `Prod.snd : α × β → β` as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.prodMap`: `Prod.map f g` as a bundled monotone map;
* `Pi.evalOrderHom`: evaluation of a function at a point `Function.eval i` as a bundled
monotone map;
* `OrderHom.coeFnHom`: coercion to function as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.apply`: application of an `OrderHom` at a point as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.pi`: combine a family of monotone maps `f i : α →o π i` into a monotone map
`α →o Π i, π i`;
* `OrderHom.piIso`: order isomorphism between `α →o Π i, π i` and `Π i, α →o π i`;
* `OrderHom.subtype.val`: embedding `Subtype.val : Subtype p → α` as a bundled monotone map;
* `OrderHom.dual`: reinterpret a monotone map `α →o β` as a monotone map `αᵒᵈ →o βᵒᵈ`;
* `OrderHom.dualIso`: order isomorphism between `α →o β` and `(αᵒᵈ →o βᵒᵈ)ᵒᵈ`;
* `OrderHom.compl`: order isomorphism `α ≃o αᵒᵈ` given by taking complements in a
boolean algebra;
We also define two functions to convert other bundled maps to `α →o β`:
* `OrderEmbedding.toOrderHom`: convert `α ↪o β` to `α →o β`;
* `RelHom.toOrderHom`: convert a `RelHom` between strict orders to an `OrderHom`.
## Tags
monotone map, bundled morphism
-/
-- Developments relating order homs and sets belong in `Order.Hom.Set` or later.
assert_not_exists Set.range
open OrderDual
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- Bundled monotone (aka, increasing) function -/
structure OrderHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `OrderHom`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The underlying function of an `OrderHom` is monotone. -/
monotone' : Monotone toFun
/-- Notation for an `OrderHom`. -/
infixr:25 " →o " => OrderHom
/-- An order embedding is an embedding `f : α ↪ β` such that `a ≤ b ↔ (f a) ≤ (f b)`.
This definition is an abbreviation of `RelEmbedding (≤) (≤)`. -/
abbrev OrderEmbedding (α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β] :=
@RelEmbedding α β (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·)
/-- Notation for an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
infixl:25 " ↪o " => OrderEmbedding
/-- An order isomorphism is an equivalence such that `a ≤ b ↔ (f a) ≤ (f b)`.
This definition is an abbreviation of `RelIso (≤) (≤)`. -/
abbrev OrderIso (α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β] :=
@RelIso α β (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·)
/-- Notation for an `OrderIso`. -/
infixl:25 " ≃o " => OrderIso
section
/-- `OrderHomClass F α b` asserts that `F` is a type of `≤`-preserving morphisms. -/
abbrev OrderHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [LE α] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] :=
RelHomClass F ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop) ((· ≤ ·) : β → β → Prop)
/-- `OrderIsoClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of order isomorphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `OrderIso`. -/
class OrderIsoClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- An order isomorphism respects `≤`. -/
map_le_map_iff (f : F) {a b : α} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b
end
export OrderIsoClass (map_le_map_iff)
attribute [simp] map_le_map_iff
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderIsoClass F α β` into an actual
`OrderIso`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃o β`. -/
@[coe]
def OrderIsoClass.toOrderIso [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] (f : F) :
α ≃o β :=
{ EquivLike.toEquiv f with map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff f }
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderIsoClass` can be cast into `OrderIso` via
`OrderIsoClass.toOrderIso`. -/
instance [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃o β) :=
⟨OrderIsoClass.toOrderIso⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toOrderHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ EquivLike.toEmbeddingLike (E := F) with
map_rel := fun f _ _ => (map_le_map_iff f).2 }
namespace OrderHomClass
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [FunLike F α β] [OrderHomClass F α β]
protected theorem monotone (f : F) : Monotone f := fun _ _ => map_rel f
protected theorem mono (f : F) : Monotone f := fun _ _ => map_rel f
@[gcongr] protected lemma GCongr.mono (f : F) {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) : f a ≤ f b :=
OrderHomClass.mono f hab
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OrderHomClass F α β` into an actual
`OrderHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α →o β`. -/
@[coe]
def toOrderHom (f : F) : α →o β where
toFun := f
monotone' := OrderHomClass.monotone f
/-- Any type satisfying `OrderHomClass` can be cast into `OrderHom` via
`OrderHomClass.toOrderHom`. -/
instance : CoeTC F (α →o β) :=
⟨toOrderHom⟩
end OrderHomClass
section OrderIsoClass
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
@[simp]
theorem map_inv_le_iff (f : F) {a : α} {b : β} : EquivLike.inv f b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ f a := by
convert (map_le_map_iff f).symm
exact (EquivLike.right_inv f _).symm
theorem map_inv_le_map_inv_iff (f : F) {a b : β} :
EquivLike.inv f b ≤ EquivLike.inv f a ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem le_map_inv_iff (f : F) {a : α} {b : β} : a ≤ EquivLike.inv f b ↔ f a ≤ b := by
convert (map_le_map_iff f).symm
exact (EquivLike.right_inv _ _).symm
end LE
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
theorem map_lt_map_iff (f : F) {a b : α} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (map_le_map_iff f) (map_le_map_iff f)
@[simp]
theorem map_inv_lt_iff (f : F) {a : α} {b : β} : EquivLike.inv f b < a ↔ b < f a := by
rw [← map_lt_map_iff f]
simp only [EquivLike.apply_inv_apply]
theorem map_inv_lt_map_inv_iff (f : F) {a b : β} :
EquivLike.inv f b < EquivLike.inv f a ↔ b < a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem lt_map_inv_iff (f : F) {a : α} {b : β} : a < EquivLike.inv f b ↔ f a < b := by
rw [← map_lt_map_iff f]
simp only [EquivLike.apply_inv_apply]
end OrderIsoClass
namespace OrderHom
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ]
instance : FunLike (α →o β) α β where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : OrderHomClass (α →o β) α β where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf : Monotone f) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone (f : α →o β) : Monotone f :=
f.monotone'
protected theorem mono (f : α →o β) : Monotone f :=
f.monotone
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We give this manually so that we use `toFun` as the
projection directly instead. -/
def Simps.coe (f : α →o β) : α → β := f
/- TODO: all other DFunLike classes use `apply` instead of `coe`
for the projection names. Maybe we should change this. -/
initialize_simps_projections OrderHom (toFun → coe)
@[simp] theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : α →o β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
-- See library note [partially-applied ext lemmas]
@[ext]
theorem ext (f g : α →o β) (h : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
@[simp] theorem coe_eq (f : α →o β) : OrderHomClass.toOrderHom f = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem _root_.OrderHomClass.coe_coe {F} [FunLike F α β] [OrderHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
⇑(f : α →o β) = f :=
rfl
/-- One can lift an unbundled monotone function to a bundled one. -/
protected instance canLift : CanLift (α → β) (α →o β) (↑) Monotone where
prf f h := ⟨⟨f, h⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Copy of an `OrderHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : α →o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : α →o β :=
⟨f', h.symm.subst f.monotone'⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : α →o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : (f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : α →o β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- The identity function as bundled monotone function. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def id : α →o α :=
⟨_root_.id, monotone_id⟩
instance : Inhabited (α →o α) :=
⟨id⟩
/-- The preorder structure of `α →o β` is pointwise inequality: `f ≤ g ↔ ∀ a, f a ≤ g a`. -/
instance : Preorder (α →o β) :=
@Preorder.lift (α →o β) (α → β) _ toFun
instance {β : Type*} [PartialOrder β] : PartialOrder (α →o β) :=
@PartialOrder.lift (α →o β) (α → β) _ toFun ext
theorem le_def {f g : α →o β} : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ g x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {f g : α →o β} : (f : α → β) ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {f g : α → β} {hf hg} : mk f hf ≤ mk g hg ↔ f ≤ g :=
Iff.rfl
@[mono]
theorem apply_mono {f g : α →o β} {x y : α} (h₁ : f ≤ g) (h₂ : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ g y :=
(h₁ x).trans <| g.mono h₂
/-- Curry/uncurry as an order isomorphism between `α × β →o γ` and `α →o β →o γ`. -/
def curry : (α × β →o γ) ≃o (α →o β →o γ) where
toFun f := ⟨fun x ↦ ⟨Function.curry f x, fun _ _ h ↦ f.mono ⟨le_rfl, h⟩⟩, fun _ _ h _ =>
f.mono ⟨h, le_rfl⟩⟩
invFun f := ⟨Function.uncurry fun x ↦ f x, fun x y h ↦ (f.mono h.1 x.2).trans ((f y.1).mono h.2)⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := by simp [le_def]
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : α × β →o γ) (x : α) (y : β) : curry f x y = f (x, y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem curry_symm_apply (f : α →o β →o γ) (x : α × β) : curry.symm f x = f x.1 x.2 :=
rfl
/-- The composition of two bundled monotone functions. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def comp (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) : α →o γ :=
⟨g ∘ f, g.mono.comp f.mono⟩
@[mono]
theorem comp_mono ⦃g₁ g₂ : β →o γ⦄ (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) ⦃f₁ f₂ : α →o β⦄ (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) :
g₁.comp f₁ ≤ g₂.comp f₂ := fun _ => (hg _).trans (g₂.mono <| hf _)
@[simp] lemma mk_comp_mk (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (hg hf) :
comp ⟨g, hg⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ = ⟨g ∘ f, hg.comp hf⟩ := rfl
/-- The composition of two bundled monotone functions, a fully bundled version. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def compₘ : (β →o γ) →o (α →o β) →o α →o γ :=
curry ⟨fun f : (β →o γ) × (α →o β) => f.1.comp f.2, fun _ _ h => comp_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : α →o β) : comp f id = f := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : α →o β) : comp id f = f := by
ext
rfl
/-- Constant function bundled as an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def const (α : Type*) [Preorder α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] : β →o α →o β where
toFun b := ⟨Function.const α b, fun _ _ _ => le_rfl⟩
monotone' _ _ h _ := h
@[simp]
theorem const_comp (f : α →o β) (c : γ) : (const β c).comp f = const α c :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_const (γ : Type*) [Preorder γ] (f : α →o β) (c : α) :
f.comp (const γ c) = const γ (f c) :=
rfl
/-- Given two bundled monotone maps `f`, `g`, `f.prod g` is the map `x ↦ (f x, g x)` bundled as a
`OrderHom`. -/
@[simps]
protected def prod (f : α →o β) (g : α →o γ) : α →o β × γ :=
⟨fun x => (f x, g x), fun _ _ h => ⟨f.mono h, g.mono h⟩⟩
@[mono]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : α →o β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) {g₁ g₂ : α →o γ} (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.prod g₁ ≤ f₂.prod g₂ := fun _ => Prod.le_def.2 ⟨hf _, hg _⟩
theorem comp_prod_comp_same (f₁ f₂ : β →o γ) (g : α →o β) :
(f₁.comp g).prod (f₂.comp g) = (f₁.prod f₂).comp g :=
rfl
/-- Given two bundled monotone maps `f`, `g`, `f.prod g` is the map `x ↦ (f x, g x)` bundled as a
`OrderHom`. This is a fully bundled version. -/
@[simps!]
def prodₘ : (α →o β) →o (α →o γ) →o α →o β × γ :=
curry ⟨fun f : (α →o β) × (α →o γ) => f.1.prod f.2, fun _ _ h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
/-- Diagonal embedding of `α` into `α × α` as an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps!]
def diag : α →o α × α :=
id.prod id
/-- Restriction of `f : α →o α →o β` to the diagonal. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs]
def onDiag (f : α →o α →o β) : α →o β :=
(curry.symm f).comp diag
/-- `Prod.fst` as an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps]
def fst : α × β →o α :=
⟨Prod.fst, fun _ _ h => h.1⟩
/-- `Prod.snd` as an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps]
def snd : α × β →o β :=
⟨Prod.snd, fun _ _ h => h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem fst_prod_snd : (fst : α × β →o α).prod snd = id := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩ : 2
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_prod (f : α →o β) (g : α →o γ) : fst.comp (f.prod g) = f :=
ext _ _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_prod (f : α →o β) (g : α →o γ) : snd.comp (f.prod g) = g :=
ext _ _ rfl
/-- Order isomorphism between the space of monotone maps to `β × γ` and the product of the spaces
of monotone maps to `β` and `γ`. -/
@[simps]
def prodIso : (α →o β × γ) ≃o (α →o β) × (α →o γ) where
toFun f := (fst.comp f, snd.comp f)
invFun f := f.1.prod f.2
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := forall_and.symm
/-- `Prod.map` of two `OrderHom`s as an `OrderHom` -/
@[simps]
def prodMap (f : α →o β) (g : γ →o δ) : α × γ →o β × δ :=
⟨Prod.map f g, fun _ _ h => ⟨f.mono h.1, g.mono h.2⟩⟩
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (π i)]
/-- Evaluation of an unbundled function at a point (`Function.eval`) as an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def _root_.Pi.evalOrderHom (i : ι) : (∀ j, π j) →o π i :=
⟨Function.eval i, Function.monotone_eval i⟩
/-- The "forgetful functor" from `α →o β` to `α → β` that takes the underlying function,
is monotone. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def coeFnHom : (α →o β) →o α → β where
toFun f := f
monotone' _ _ h := h
/-- Function application `fun f => f a` (for fixed `a`) is a monotone function from the
monotone function space `α →o β` to `β`. See also `Pi.evalOrderHom`. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def apply (x : α) : (α →o β) →o β :=
(Pi.evalOrderHom x).comp coeFnHom
/-- Construct a bundled monotone map `α →o Π i, π i` from a family of monotone maps
`f i : α →o π i`. -/
@[simps]
def pi (f : ∀ i, α →o π i) : α →o ∀ i, π i :=
⟨fun x i => f i x, fun _ _ h i => (f i).mono h⟩
/-- Order isomorphism between bundled monotone maps `α →o Π i, π i` and families of bundled monotone
maps `Π i, α →o π i`. -/
@[simps]
def piIso : (α →o ∀ i, π i) ≃o ∀ i, α →o π i where
toFun f i := (Pi.evalOrderHom i).comp f
invFun := pi
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := forall_swap
/-- `Subtype.val` as a bundled monotone function. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def Subtype.val (p : α → Prop) : Subtype p →o α :=
⟨_root_.Subtype.val, fun _ _ h => h⟩
/-- `Subtype.impEmbedding` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Subtype.orderEmbedding {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a → q a) :
{x // p x} ↪o {x // q x} :=
{ Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ h with
map_rel_iff' := by aesop }
/-- There is a unique monotone map from a subsingleton to itself. -/
instance unique [Subsingleton α] : Unique (α →o α) where
default := OrderHom.id
uniq _ := ext _ _ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
theorem orderHom_eq_id [Subsingleton α] (g : α →o α) : g = OrderHom.id :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Reinterpret a bundled monotone function as a monotone function between dual orders. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual : (α →o β) ≃ (αᵒᵈ →o βᵒᵈ) where
toFun f := ⟨(OrderDual.toDual : β → βᵒᵈ) ∘ (f : α → β) ∘
(OrderDual.ofDual : αᵒᵈ → α), f.mono.dual⟩
invFun f := ⟨OrderDual.ofDual ∘ f ∘ OrderDual.toDual, f.mono.dual⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : (OrderHom.id : α →o α).dual = OrderHom.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) :
(g.comp f).dual = g.dual.comp f.dual :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : OrderHom.dual.symm OrderHom.id = (OrderHom.id : α →o α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : βᵒᵈ →o γᵒᵈ) (f : αᵒᵈ →o βᵒᵈ) :
OrderHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (OrderHom.dual.symm g).comp (OrderHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
/-- `OrderHom.dual` as an order isomorphism. -/
def dualIso (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] : (α →o β) ≃o (αᵒᵈ →o βᵒᵈ)ᵒᵈ where
toEquiv := OrderHom.dual.trans OrderDual.toDual
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Lift an order homomorphism `f : α →o β` to an order homomorphism `ULift α →o ULift β` in a
higher universe. -/
@[simps!]
def uliftMap (f : α →o β) : ULift α →o ULift β :=
⟨fun i => ⟨f i.down⟩, fun _ _ h ↦ f.monotone h⟩
end OrderHom
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 90) OrderHomClass.toOrderHomClassOrderDual [LE α] [LE β]
[FunLike F α β] [OrderHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
map_rel f := map_rel f
/-- Embeddings of partial orders that preserve `<` also preserve `≤`. -/
def RelEmbedding.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
(f : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ↪r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) : α ↪o β :=
{ f with
map_rel_iff' := by
intros
simp [le_iff_lt_or_eq, f.map_rel_iff, f.injective.eq_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem RelEmbedding.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding_apply [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
{f : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ↪r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)} {x : α} :
RelEmbedding.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding f x = f x :=
rfl
namespace OrderEmbedding
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α ↪o β)
/-- `<` is preserved by order embeddings of preorders. -/
def ltEmbedding : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ↪r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop) :=
{ f with map_rel_iff' := by intros; simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, f.map_rel_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem ltEmbedding_apply (x : α) : f.ltEmbedding x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_iff_le {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
f.map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_lt {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
f.ltEmbedding.map_rel_iff
theorem eq_iff_eq {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
f.injective.eq_iff
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f :=
OrderHomClass.monotone f
protected theorem strictMono : StrictMono f := fun _ _ => f.lt_iff_lt.2
protected theorem acc (a : α) : Acc (· < ·) (f a) → Acc (· < ·) a :=
f.ltEmbedding.acc a
protected theorem wellFounded (f : α ↪o β) :
WellFounded ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop) → WellFounded ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) :=
f.ltEmbedding.wellFounded
protected theorem isWellOrder [IsWellOrder β (· < ·)] (f : α ↪o β) : IsWellOrder α (· < ·) :=
f.ltEmbedding.isWellOrder
/-- An order embedding is also an order embedding between dual orders. -/
protected def dual : αᵒᵈ ↪o βᵒᵈ :=
⟨f.toEmbedding, f.map_rel_iff⟩
/-- A preorder which embeds into a well-founded preorder is itself well-founded. -/
protected theorem wellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT β] (f : α ↪o β) : WellFoundedLT α where
wf := f.wellFounded IsWellFounded.wf
/-- A preorder which embeds into a preorder in which `(· > ·)` is well-founded
also has `(· > ·)` well-founded. -/
protected theorem wellFoundedGT [WellFoundedGT β] (f : α ↪o β) : WellFoundedGT α :=
@OrderEmbedding.wellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ f.dual
/-- To define an order embedding from a partial order to a preorder it suffices to give a function
together with a proof that it satisfies `f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b`.
-/
def ofMapLEIff {α β} [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a b, f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b) :
α ↪o β :=
RelEmbedding.ofMapRelIff f hf
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofMapLEIff {α β} [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (h) :
⇑(ofMapLEIff f h) = f :=
rfl
/-- A strictly monotone map from a linear order is an order embedding. -/
def ofStrictMono {α β} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (h : StrictMono f) : α ↪o β :=
ofMapLEIff f fun _ _ => h.le_iff_le
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofStrictMono {α β} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (h : StrictMono f) :
⇑(ofStrictMono f h) = f :=
rfl
/-- Embedding of a subtype into the ambient type as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def subtype (p : α → Prop) : Subtype p ↪o α :=
⟨Function.Embedding.subtype p, Iff.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem subtype_apply {p : α → Prop} (x : Subtype p) : subtype p x = x :=
rfl
theorem subtype_injective (p : α → Prop) : Function.Injective (subtype p) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (p : α → Prop) : ⇑(subtype p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
/-- Convert an `OrderEmbedding` to an `OrderHom`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def toOrderHom {X Y : Type*} [Preorder X] [Preorder Y] (f : X ↪o Y) : X →o Y where
toFun := f
monotone' := f.monotone
/-- The trivial embedding from an empty preorder to another preorder -/
@[simps] def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : α ↪o β where
toFun := isEmptyElim
inj' := isEmptyElim
map_rel_iff' {a} := isEmptyElim a
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : (ofIsEmpty : α ↪o β) = (isEmptyElim : α → β) := rfl
end OrderEmbedding
section Disjoint
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] (f : OrderEmbedding α β)
/-- If the images by an order embedding of two elements are disjoint,
then they are themselves disjoint. -/
lemma Disjoint.of_orderEmbedding [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] {a₁ a₂ : α} :
Disjoint (f a₁) (f a₂) → Disjoint a₁ a₂ := by
intro h x h₁ h₂
rw [← f.le_iff_le] at h₁ h₂ ⊢
calc
f x ≤ ⊥ := h h₁ h₂
_ ≤ f ⊥ := bot_le
/-- If the images by an order embedding of two elements are codisjoint,
then they are themselves codisjoint. -/
lemma Codisjoint.of_orderEmbedding [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] {a₁ a₂ : α} :
Codisjoint (f a₁) (f a₂) → Codisjoint a₁ a₂ :=
Disjoint.of_orderEmbedding (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) f.dual
/-- If the images by an order embedding of two elements are complements,
then they are themselves complements. -/
lemma IsCompl.of_orderEmbedding [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] {a₁ a₂ : α} :
IsCompl (f a₁) (f a₂) → IsCompl a₁ a₂ := fun ⟨hd, hcd⟩ ↦
⟨Disjoint.of_orderEmbedding f hd, Codisjoint.of_orderEmbedding f hcd⟩
end Disjoint
section RelHom
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β]
namespace RelHom
variable (f : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) →r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop))
/-- A bundled expression of the fact that a map between partial orders that is strictly monotone
is weakly monotone. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def toOrderHom : α →o β where
toFun := f
monotone' := StrictMono.monotone fun _ _ => f.map_rel
end RelHom
theorem RelEmbedding.toOrderHom_injective
(f : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ↪r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) :
Function.Injective (f : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) →r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)).toOrderHom :=
fun _ _ h => f.injective h
end RelHom
namespace OrderIso
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] [LE γ]
instance : EquivLike (α ≃o β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
instance : OrderIsoClass (α ≃o β) α β where
map_le_map_iff f _ _ := f.map_rel_iff'
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : α ≃o β} : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α ≃o β} (h : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
/-- Reinterpret an order isomorphism as an order embedding. -/
def toOrderEmbedding (e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β :=
e.toRelEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderEmbedding (e : α ≃o β) : ⇑e.toOrderEmbedding = e :=
rfl
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃o β) : Function.Bijective e :=
e.toEquiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃o β) : Function.Injective e :=
e.toEquiv.injective
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃o β) : Function.Surjective e :=
e.toEquiv.surjective
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (e : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : e x = e y ↔ x = y :=
e.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq
/-- Identity order isomorphism. -/
def refl (α : Type*) [LE α] : α ≃o α :=
RelIso.refl (· ≤ ·)
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(refl α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (x : α) : refl α x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_toEquiv : (refl α).toEquiv = Equiv.refl α :=
rfl
/-- Inverse of an order isomorphism. -/
def symm (e : α ≃o β) : β ≃o α := RelIso.symm e
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃o β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃o β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp]
theorem symm_refl (α : Type*) [LE α] : (refl α).symm = refl α :=
rfl
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply (e : α ≃o β) (x : α) (y : β) : e x = y ↔ x = e.symm y :=
e.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (e : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} : e.symm y = x ↔ y = e x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (e : α ≃o β) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (OrderIso.symm : (α ≃o β) → β ≃o α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
theorem symm_injective : Function.Injective (symm : α ≃o β → β ≃o α) :=
symm_bijective.injective
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_symm (e : α ≃o β) : e.toEquiv.symm = e.symm.toEquiv :=
rfl
/-- Composition of two order isomorphisms is an order isomorphism. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e : α ≃o β) (e' : β ≃o γ) : α ≃o γ :=
RelIso.trans e e'
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (e : α ≃o β) (e' : β ≃o γ) : ⇑(e.trans e') = e' ∘ e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (e : α ≃o β) (e' : β ≃o γ) (x : α) : e.trans e' x = e' (e x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (e : α ≃o β) : (refl α).trans e = e := by
ext x
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (e : α ≃o β) : e.trans (refl β) = e := by
ext x
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (e₁ : α ≃o β) (e₂ : β ≃o γ) (c : γ) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm c = e₁.symm (e₂.symm c) :=
rfl
theorem symm_trans (e₁ : α ≃o β) (e₂ : β ≃o γ) : (e₁.trans e₂).symm = e₂.symm.trans e₁.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃o β) : e.trans e.symm = OrderIso.refl α :=
RelIso.self_trans_symm e
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃o β) : e.symm.trans e = OrderIso.refl β :=
RelIso.symm_trans_self e
/-- An order isomorphism between the domains and codomains of two prosets of
order homomorphisms gives an order isomorphism between the two function prosets. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def arrowCongr {α β γ δ} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ]
(f : α ≃o γ) (g : β ≃o δ) : (α →o β) ≃o (γ →o δ) where
toFun p := .comp g <| .comp p f.symm
invFun p := .comp g.symm <| .comp p f
left_inv p := DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
change (g.symm ∘ g) ∘ p ∘ (f.symm ∘ f) = p
simp only [← DFunLike.coe_eq_coe_fn, ← OrderIso.coe_trans, Function.id_comp,
OrderIso.self_trans_symm, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
right_inv p := DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
change (g ∘ g.symm) ∘ p ∘ (f ∘ f.symm) = p
simp only [← DFunLike.coe_eq_coe_fn, ← OrderIso.coe_trans, Function.id_comp,
OrderIso.symm_trans_self, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
map_rel_iff' {p q} := by
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, OrderHom.le_def, OrderHom.comp_coe,
OrderHomClass.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, map_le_map_iff]
exact Iff.symm f.forall_congr_left
/-- If `α` and `β` are order-isomorphic then the two orders of order-homomorphisms
from `α` and `β` to themselves are order-isomorphic. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def conj {α β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α ≃o β) : (α →o α) ≃ (β →o β) :=
arrowCongr f f
/-- `Prod.swap` as an `OrderIso`. -/
def prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α where
toEquiv := Equiv.prodComm α β
map_rel_iff' := Prod.swap_le_swap
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodComm : ⇑(prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α) = Prod.swap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_symm : (prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α).symm = prodComm :=
rfl
variable (α)
/-- The order isomorphism between a type and its double dual. -/
def dualDual : α ≃o αᵒᵈᵒᵈ :=
refl α
@[simp]
theorem coe_dualDual : ⇑(dualDual α) = toDual ∘ toDual :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_dualDual_symm : ⇑(dualDual α).symm = ofDual ∘ ofDual :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem dualDual_apply (a : α) : dualDual α a = toDual (toDual a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualDual_symm_apply (a : αᵒᵈᵒᵈ) : (dualDual α).symm a = ofDual (ofDual a) :=
rfl
end LE
open Set
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β]
theorem le_iff_le (e : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : e x ≤ e y ↔ x ≤ y :=
e.map_rel_iff
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.orderIso_apply_le_apply⟩ := le_iff_le
theorem le_symm_apply (e : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} : x ≤ e.symm y ↔ e x ≤ y :=
e.rel_symm_apply
theorem symm_apply_le (e : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} : e.symm y ≤ x ↔ y ≤ e x :=
e.symm_apply_rel
end LE
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
protected theorem monotone (e : α ≃o β) : Monotone e :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.monotone
protected theorem strictMono (e : α ≃o β) : StrictMono e :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.strictMono
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_lt (e : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : e x < e y ↔ x < y :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.orderIso_apply_lt_apply⟩ := lt_iff_lt
theorem lt_symm_apply (e : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} : x < e.symm y ↔ e x < y := by
rw [← e.lt_iff_lt, e.apply_symm_apply]
theorem symm_apply_lt (e : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} : e.symm y < x ↔ y < e x := by
rw [← e.lt_iff_lt, e.apply_symm_apply]
/-- Converts an `OrderIso` into a `RelIso (<) (<)`. -/
def toRelIsoLT (e : α ≃o β) : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ≃r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop) :=
⟨e.toEquiv, lt_iff_lt e⟩
@[simp]
theorem toRelIsoLT_apply (e : α ≃o β) (x : α) : e.toRelIsoLT x = e x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toRelIsoLT_symm (e : α ≃o β) : e.toRelIsoLT.symm = e.symm.toRelIsoLT :=
rfl
/-- Converts a `RelIso (<) (<)` into an `OrderIso`. -/
def ofRelIsoLT {α β} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
(e : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ≃r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) : α ≃o β :=
⟨e.toEquiv, by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, e.map_rel_iff, e.injective.eq_iff]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofRelIsoLT_apply {α β} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
(e : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ≃r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) (x : α) : ofRelIsoLT e x = e x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofRelIsoLT_symm {α β} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
(e : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ≃r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) :
(ofRelIsoLT e).symm = ofRelIsoLT e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofRelIsoLT_toRelIsoLT {α β} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] (e : α ≃o β) :
ofRelIsoLT (toRelIsoLT e) = e := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toRelIsoLT_ofRelIsoLT {α β} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
(e : ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop) ≃r ((· < ·) : β → β → Prop)) : toRelIsoLT (ofRelIsoLT e) = e := by
ext
simp
/-- To show that `f : α → β`, `g : β → α` make up an order isomorphism of linear orders,
it suffices to prove `cmp a (g b) = cmp (f a) b`. -/
def ofCmpEqCmp {α β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α)
(h : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), cmp a (g b) = cmp (f a) b) : α ≃o β :=
have gf : ∀ a : α, a = g (f a) := by
intro
rw [← cmp_eq_eq_iff, h, cmp_self_eq_eq]
{ toFun := f, invFun := g, left_inv := fun a => (gf a).symm,
right_inv := by
intro
rw [← cmp_eq_eq_iff, ← h, cmp_self_eq_eq],
map_rel_iff' := by
intros a b
apply le_iff_le_of_cmp_eq_cmp
convert (h a (f b)).symm
apply gf }
/-- To show that `f : α →o β` and `g : β →o α` make up an order isomorphism it is enough to show
that `g` is the inverse of `f`. -/
def ofHomInv {F G : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [OrderHomClass F α β] [FunLike G β α]
[OrderHomClass G β α] (f : F) (g : G)
(h₁ : (f : α →o β).comp (g : β →o α) = OrderHom.id)
(h₂ : (g : β →o α).comp (f : α →o β) = OrderHom.id) :
α ≃o β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := DFunLike.congr_fun h₂
right_inv := DFunLike.congr_fun h₁
map_rel_iff' := @fun a b =>
⟨fun h => by
replace h := map_rel g h
rwa [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, show g (f a) = (g : β →o α).comp (f : α →o β) a from rfl,
show g (f b) = (g : β →o α).comp (f : α →o β) b from rfl, h₂] at h,
fun h => (f : α →o β).monotone h⟩
/-- Order isomorphism between `α → β` and `β`, where `α` has a unique element. -/
@[simps! toEquiv apply]
def funUnique (α β : Type*) [Unique α] [Preorder β] : (α → β) ≃o β where
toEquiv := Equiv.funUnique α β
map_rel_iff' := by simp [Pi.le_def, Unique.forall_iff]
@[simp]
theorem funUnique_symm_apply {α β : Type*} [Unique α] [Preorder β] :
((funUnique α β).symm : β → α → β) = Function.const α :=
rfl
/-- The order isomorphism `α ≃o β` when `α` and `β` are preordered types
containing unique elements. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofUnique
(α β : Type*) [Unique α] [Unique β] [Preorder α] [Preorder β] :
α ≃o β where
toEquiv := Equiv.ofUnique α β
map_rel_iff' := by simp
end OrderIso
namespace Equiv
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
/-- If `e` is an equivalence with monotone forward and inverse maps, then `e` is an
order isomorphism. -/
def toOrderIso (e : α ≃ β) (h₁ : Monotone e) (h₂ : Monotone e.symm) : α ≃o β :=
⟨e, ⟨fun h => by simpa only [e.symm_apply_apply] using h₂ h, fun h => h₁ h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (e : α ≃ β) (h₁ : Monotone e) (h₂ : Monotone e.symm) :
⇑(e.toOrderIso h₁ h₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrderIso_toEquiv (e : α ≃ β) (h₁ : Monotone e) (h₂ : Monotone e.symm) :
(e.toOrderIso h₁ h₂).toEquiv = e :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace StrictMono
variable [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β]
variable (f : α → β) (h_mono : StrictMono f)
/-- A strictly monotone function with a right inverse is an order isomorphism. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def orderIsoOfRightInverse (g : β → α) (hg : Function.RightInverse g f) : α ≃o β :=
{ OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f h_mono with
toFun := f,
invFun := g,
left_inv := fun _ => h_mono.injective <| hg _,
right_inv := hg }
end StrictMono
/-- An order isomorphism is also an order isomorphism between dual orders. -/
protected def OrderIso.dual [LE α] [LE β] (f : α ≃o β) : αᵒᵈ ≃o βᵒᵈ :=
⟨f.toEquiv, f.map_rel_iff⟩
section LatticeIsos
theorem OrderIso.map_bot' [LE α] [PartialOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} (hx : ∀ x', x ≤ x')
(hy : ∀ y', y ≤ y') : f x = y := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (hy _)
rw [← f.apply_symm_apply y, f.map_rel_iff]
apply hx
theorem OrderIso.map_bot [LE α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] (f : α ≃o β) : f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
f.map_bot' (fun _ => bot_le) fun _ => bot_le
theorem OrderIso.map_top' [LE α] [PartialOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) {x : α} {y : β} (hx : ∀ x', x' ≤ x)
(hy : ∀ y', y' ≤ y) : f x = y :=
f.dual.map_bot' hx hy
theorem OrderIso.map_top [LE α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] (f : α ≃o β) : f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
f.dual.map_bot
theorem OrderEmbedding.map_inf_le [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : α ↪o β) (x y : α) :
f (x ⊓ y) ≤ f x ⊓ f y :=
f.monotone.map_inf_le x y
theorem OrderEmbedding.le_map_sup [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] (f : α ↪o β) (x y : α) :
f x ⊔ f y ≤ f (x ⊔ y) :=
f.monotone.le_map_sup x y
theorem OrderIso.map_inf [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : α ≃o β) (x y : α) :
f (x ⊓ y) = f x ⊓ f y := by
refine (f.toOrderEmbedding.map_inf_le x y).antisymm ?_
apply f.symm.le_iff_le.1
simpa using f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.map_inf_le (f x) (f y)
theorem OrderIso.map_sup [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] (f : α ≃o β) (x y : α) :
f (x ⊔ y) = f x ⊔ f y :=
f.dual.map_inf x y
theorem OrderIso.isMax_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α ≃o β) {x : α} :
IsMax (f x) ↔ IsMax x := by
refine ⟨f.strictMono.isMax_of_apply, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x]
exact f.symm.strictMono.isMax_of_apply
theorem OrderIso.isMin_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α ≃o β) {x : α} :
IsMin (f x) ↔ IsMin x := by
refine ⟨f.strictMono.isMin_of_apply, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x]
exact f.symm.strictMono.isMin_of_apply
/-- Note that this goal could also be stated `(Disjoint on f) a b` -/
theorem Disjoint.map_orderIso [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderBot β]
{a b : α} (f : α ≃o β) (ha : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (f a) (f b) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← f.map_inf, ← f.map_bot]
exact f.monotone ha.le_bot
/-- Note that this goal could also be stated `(Codisjoint on f) a b` -/
theorem Codisjoint.map_orderIso [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderTop β]
{a b : α} (f : α ≃o β) (ha : Codisjoint a b) : Codisjoint (f a) (f b) := by
rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup, ← f.map_sup, ← f.map_top]
exact f.monotone ha.top_le
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_map_orderIso_iff [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderBot β]
{a b : α} (f : α ≃o β) : Disjoint (f a) (f b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
⟨fun h => f.symm_apply_apply a ▸ f.symm_apply_apply b ▸ h.map_orderIso f.symm,
fun h => h.map_orderIso f⟩
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_map_orderIso_iff [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderTop β]
{a b : α} (f : α ≃o β) : Codisjoint (f a) (f b) ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
⟨fun h => f.symm_apply_apply a ▸ f.symm_apply_apply b ▸ h.map_orderIso f.symm,
fun h => h.map_orderIso f⟩
section BoundedOrder
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] (f : α ≃o β)
theorem OrderIso.isCompl {x y : α} (h : IsCompl x y) : IsCompl (f x) (f y) :=
⟨h.1.map_orderIso _, h.2.map_orderIso _⟩
theorem OrderIso.isCompl_iff {x y : α} : IsCompl x y ↔ IsCompl (f x) (f y) :=
⟨f.isCompl, fun h => f.symm_apply_apply x ▸ f.symm_apply_apply y ▸ f.symm.isCompl h⟩
theorem OrderIso.complementedLattice [ComplementedLattice α] (f : α ≃o β) : ComplementedLattice β :=
⟨fun x => by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_isCompl (f.symm x)
rw [← f.symm_apply_apply y] at hy
exact ⟨f y, f.symm.isCompl_iff.2 hy⟩⟩
theorem OrderIso.complementedLattice_iff (f : α ≃o β) :
ComplementedLattice α ↔ ComplementedLattice β :=
⟨by intro; exact f.complementedLattice,
by intro; exact f.symm.complementedLattice⟩
end BoundedOrder
end LatticeIsos
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 90) OrderIsoClass.toOrderIsoClassOrderDual [LE α] [LE β]
[EquivLike F α β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : OrderIsoClass F αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
map_le_map_iff f := map_le_map_iff f
section DenselyOrdered
lemma denselyOrdered_iff_of_orderIsoClass {X Y F : Type*} [Preorder X] [Preorder Y]
[EquivLike F X Y] [OrderIsoClass F X Y] (f : F) :
DenselyOrdered X ↔ DenselyOrdered Y := by
constructor
· intro H
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_between ((map_inv_lt_map_inv_iff f).mpr h)
exact ⟨f c, by simpa using hc⟩
· intro H
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_between ((map_lt_map_iff f).mpr h)
exact ⟨EquivLike.inv f c, by simpa using hc⟩
end DenselyOrdered
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Basic.lean | 1,285 | 1,288 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Bifunctor
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
/-!
# The action of a bifunctor on homological complexes factors through homotopies
Given a `TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c`, a functor `F : C₁ ⥤ C₂ ⥤ D`,
we shall show in this file that up to homotopy the morphism
`mapBifunctorMap f₁ f₂ F c` only depends on the homotopy classes of
the morphism `f₁` in `HomologicalComplex C c₁` and of
the morphism `f₂` in `HomologicalComplex C c₂` (TODO).
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
variable {C₁ C₂ D I₁ I₂ J : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category D]
[Preadditive C₁] [Preadditive C₂] [Preadditive D]
{c₁ : ComplexShape I₁} {c₂ : ComplexShape I₂}
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {K₁ L₁ : HomologicalComplex C₁ c₁} {f₁ f₁' : K₁ ⟶ L₁} (h₁ : Homotopy f₁ f₁')
{K₂ L₂ : HomologicalComplex C₂ c₂} (f₂ : K₂ ⟶ L₂)
(F : C₁ ⥤ C₂ ⥤ D) [F.Additive] [∀ X₁, (F.obj X₁).Additive]
(c : ComplexShape J) [DecidableEq J] [TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c]
[HasMapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F c]
[HasMapBifunctor L₁ L₂ F c]
namespace mapBifunctorMapHomotopy
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mapBifunctorMapHomotopy₁`. -/
noncomputable def hom₁ (j j' : J) :
(mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F c).X j ⟶ (mapBifunctor L₁ L₂ F c).X j' :=
HomologicalComplex₂.totalDesc _
(fun i₁ i₂ _ => ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c (c₁.prev i₁, i₂) •
(F.map (h₁.hom i₁ (c₁.prev i₁))).app (K₂.X i₂) ≫
| (F.obj (L₁.X (c₁.prev i₁))).map (f₂.f i₂) ≫ ιMapBifunctorOrZero L₁ L₂ F c _ _ j')
@[reassoc]
lemma ιMapBifunctor_hom₁ (i₁ i₁' : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (j j' : J)
(h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c (i₁', i₂) = j) (h' : c₁.prev i₁' = i₁) :
ιMapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F c i₁' i₂ j h ≫ hom₁ h₁ f₂ F c j j' = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c (i₁, i₂) •
(F.map (h₁.hom i₁' i₁)).app (K₂.X i₂) ≫ (F.obj (L₁.X i₁)).map (f₂.f i₂) ≫
ιMapBifunctorOrZero L₁ L₂ F c _ _ j' := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/BifunctorHomotopy.lean | 45 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Bitwise operations on natural numbers
In the first half of this file, we provide theorems for reasoning about natural numbers from their
bitwise properties. In the second half of this file, we show properties of the bitwise operations
`lor`, `land` and `xor`, which are defined in core.
## Main results
* `eq_of_testBit_eq`: two natural numbers are equal if they have equal bits at every position.
* `exists_most_significant_bit`: if `n ≠ 0`, then there is some position `i` that contains the most
significant `1`-bit of `n`.
* `lt_of_testBit`: if `n` and `m` are numbers and `i` is a position such that the `i`-th bit of
of `n` is zero, the `i`-th bit of `m` is one, and all more significant bits are equal, then
`n < m`.
## Future work
There is another way to express bitwise properties of natural number: `digits 2`. The two ways
should be connected.
## Keywords
bitwise, and, or, xor
-/
open Function
namespace Nat
section
variable {f : Bool → Bool → Bool}
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_left (m : Nat) : bitwise f 0 m = if f false true then m else 0 := by
simp [bitwise]
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_right (n : Nat) : bitwise f n 0 = if f true false then n else 0 := by
unfold bitwise
simp only [ite_self, decide_false, Nat.zero_div, ite_true, ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro ⟨⟩
split_ifs <;> rfl
lemma bitwise_zero : bitwise f 0 0 = 0 := by
simp only [bitwise_zero_right, ite_self]
lemma bitwise_of_ne_zero {n m : Nat} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
bitwise f n m = bit (f (bodd n) (bodd m)) (bitwise f (n / 2) (m / 2)) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
have mod_two_iff_bod x : (x % 2 = 1 : Bool) = bodd x := by
simp only [mod_two_of_bodd, cond]; cases bodd x <;> rfl
simp only [hn, hm, mod_two_iff_bod, ite_false, bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
theorem binaryRec_of_ne_zero {C : Nat → Sort*} (z : C 0) (f : ∀ b n, C n → C (bit b n)) {n}
(h : n ≠ 0) :
binaryRec z f n = bit_decomp n ▸ f (bodd n) (div2 n) (binaryRec z f (div2 n)) := by
cases n using bitCasesOn with
| h b n =>
rw [binaryRec_eq _ _ (by right; simpa [bit_eq_zero_iff] using h)]
generalize_proofs h; revert h
rw [bodd_bit, div2_bit]
simp
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_bit {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (h : f false false = false := by rfl) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
simp only [bit, ite_apply, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
have h4 x : (x + x + 1) / 2 = x := by rw [← two_mul, add_comm]; simp [add_mul_div_left]
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [h4] <;> split_ifs
<;> simp_all +decide [two_mul]
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_zero_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 0 ↔ !a := by
simp
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 1 ↔ a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem lor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ||| bit b n = bit (a || b) (m ||| n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem land_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m &&& bit b n = bit (a && b) (m &&& n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem ldiff_bit : ∀ a m b n, ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && not b) (ldiff m n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem xor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ^^^ bit b n = bit (bne a b) (m ^^^ n) :=
bitwise_bit
attribute [simp] Nat.testBit_bitwise
theorem testBit_lor : ∀ m n k, testBit (m ||| n) k = (testBit m k || testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
theorem testBit_land : ∀ m n k, testBit (m &&& n) k = (testBit m k && testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
@[simp]
theorem testBit_ldiff : ∀ m n k, testBit (ldiff m n) k = (testBit m k && not (testBit n k)) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
attribute [simp] testBit_xor
end
@[simp]
theorem bit_false : bit false = (2 * ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bit_true : bit true = (2 * · + 1) :=
rfl
theorem bit_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} {b : Bool} : n.bit b ≠ 0 ↔ n = 0 → b = true := by
simp
/-- An alternative for `bitwise_bit` which replaces the `f false false = false` assumption
with assumptions that neither `bit a m` nor `bit b n` are `0`
(albeit, phrased as the implications `m = 0 → a = true` and `n = 0 → b = true`) -/
lemma bitwise_bit' {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (a : Bool) (m : Nat) (b : Bool) (n : Nat)
(ham : m = 0 → a = true) (hbn : n = 0 → b = true) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at ham hbn
simp only [ham, hbn, bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff, Bool.decide_coe, ← div2_val, div2_bit, ne_eq,
ite_false]
conv_rhs => simp only [bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
lemma bitwise_eq_binaryRec (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) :
bitwise f =
binaryRec (fun n => cond (f false true) n 0) fun a m Ia =>
binaryRec (cond (f true false) (bit a m) 0) fun b n _ => bit (f a b) (Ia n) := by
funext x y
induction x using binaryRec' generalizing y with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_left, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f xb x hxb ih =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hxb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hxb, bodd_bit, div2_bit, eq_rec_constant]
induction y using binaryRec' with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_right, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f yb y hyb =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hyb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hyb, bitwise_of_ne_zero hxb hyb, bodd_bit, ← div2_val,
div2_bit, eq_rec_constant, ih]
theorem zero_of_testBit_eq_false {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ i, testBit n i = false) : n = 0 := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => rfl | f b n hn => ?_
have : b = false := by simpa using h 0
rw [this, bit_false, hn fun i => by rw [← h (i + 1), testBit_bit_succ]]
theorem testBit_eq_false_of_lt {n i} (h : n < 2 ^ i) : n.testBit i = false := by
simp [testBit, shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Nat.div_eq_of_lt h]
/-- The ith bit is the ith element of `n.bits`. -/
theorem testBit_eq_inth (n i : ℕ) : n.testBit i = n.bits.getI i := by
induction i generalizing n with
| zero =>
simp only [testBit, zero_eq, shiftRight_zero, one_and_eq_mod_two, mod_two_of_bodd,
bodd_eq_bits_head, List.getI_zero_eq_headI]
cases List.headI (bits n) <;> rfl
| succ i ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [← bit_decomp n]
rw [testBit_bit_succ, ih n.div2, div2_bits_eq_tail]
cases n.bits <;> simp
theorem exists_most_significant_bit {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
∃ i, testBit n i = true ∧ ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = false := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => exact False.elim (h rfl) | f b n hn => ?_
by_cases h' : n = 0
· subst h'
rw [show b = true by
revert h
cases b <;> simp]
refine ⟨0, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_zero], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hj)
rw [testBit_bit_succ, zero_testBit]
· obtain ⟨k, ⟨hk, hk'⟩⟩ := hn h'
refine ⟨k + 1, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_succ, hk], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (show j ≠ 0 by intro x; subst x; simp at hj)
exact (testBit_bit_succ _ _ _).trans (hk' _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ hj))
theorem lt_of_testBit {n m : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hn : testBit n i = false) (hm : testBit m i = true)
(hnm : ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = testBit m j) : n < m := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i m with
| z =>
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rintro rfl
simp at hm
| f b n hn' =>
induction m using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i with
| z => exact False.elim (Bool.false_ne_true ((zero_testBit i).symm.trans hm))
| f b' m hm' =>
by_cases hi : i = 0
· subst hi
simp only [testBit_bit_zero] at hn hm
have : n = m :=
eq_of_testBit_eq fun i => by convert hnm (i + 1) (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) using 1
<;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
rw [hn, hm, this, bit_false, bit_true]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
· obtain ⟨i', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hi
simp only [testBit_bit_succ] at hn hm
have := hn' _ hn hm fun j hj => by
convert hnm j.succ (succ_lt_succ hj) using 1 <;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
have this' : 2 * n < 2 * m := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) this Nat.two_pos
cases b <;> cases b'
<;> simp only [bit_false, bit_true]
· exact this'
| · exact Nat.lt_add_right 1 this'
· calc
2 * n + 1 < 2 * n + 2 := lt.base _
_ ≤ 2 * m := mul_le_mul_left 2 this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ this'
theorem bitwise_swap {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} :
bitwise (Function.swap f) = Function.swap (bitwise f) := by
funext m n
simp only [Function.swap]
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn generalizing n with | ind m ih => ?_
rcases m with - | m
<;> rcases n with - | n
<;> try rw [bitwise_zero_left, bitwise_zero_right]
· specialize ih ((m+1) / 2) (div_lt_self' ..)
simp [bitwise_of_ne_zero, ih]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean | 230 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : {x ∈ s | x ≠ i}.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
/-- An affine combination over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points take only two values. -/
lemma affineCombination_apply_eq_lineMap_sum [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(p₁ p₂ : P) (s' : Finset ι) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hp₂ : ∀ i ∈ s ∩ s', p i = p₂)
(hp₁ : ∀ i ∈ s \ s', p i = p₁) :
s.affineCombination k p w = AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ (∑ i ∈ s ∩ s', w i) := by
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h p₁,
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← s.sum_inter_add_sum_diff s', AffineMap.lineMap_apply,
vadd_right_cancel_iff, sum_smul]
convert add_zero _ with i hi
· convert Finset.sum_const_zero with i hi
simp [hp₁ i hi]
· exact (hp₂ i hi).symm
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Pi.single i 1
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := Pi.single_eq_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
|
variable {k}
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 653 | 654 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Fin
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
/-!
### Locally finite order etc instances
-/
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder (n : ℕ) : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) where
finsetIcc a b := attachFin (Icc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIco a b := attachFin (Ico a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finsetIoc a b := attachFin (Ioc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIoo a b := attachFin (Ioo a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finset_mem_Icc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ico a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo a b := by simp
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n}
variable {m : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Icc :
attachFin (Icc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Icc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico :
attachFin (Ico a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ico a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioc :
attachFin (Ioc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Ioc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo :
attachFin (Ioo a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ioo a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_uIcc :
attachFin (uIcc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt (max a b).2) = uIcc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici : attachFin (Ico a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2) = Ici a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi : attachFin (Ioo a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2) = Ioi a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iic : attachFin (Iic a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iic.mp hx).trans_lt a.2) = Iic a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iio : attachFin (Iio a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iio.mp hx).trans a.2) = Iio a := by
ext; simp
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Icc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_uIcc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := Icc_eq_finset_subtype _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ici_eq_finset_subtype : Ici a = (Ico (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioi_eq_finset_subtype : Ioi a = (Ioo (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iic (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iic_eq_finset_subtype : Iic b = (Iic (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iio (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iio_eq_finset_subtype : Iio b = (Iio (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
end deprecated
section val
/-!
### Images under `Fin.val`
-/
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Icc : (Icc a b).image val = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ico : (Ico a b).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioc : (Ioc a b).image val = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioo : (Ioo a b).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_uIcc : (uIcc a b).image val = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
finsetImage_val_Icc _ _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ici : (Ici a).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioi : (Ioi a).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iic : (Iic a).image val = Iic (a : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iio : (Iio b).image val = Iio (b : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-!
### `Finset.map` along `Fin.valEmbedding`
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
| theorem map_valEmbedding_uIcc : (uIcc a b).map valEmbedding = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_Icc _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")]
alias map_subtype_embedding_uIcc := map_valEmbedding_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ici : (Ici a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by
rw [← attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioi : (Ioi a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 190 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Triangles
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and angles
in (possibly degenerate) triangles in real inner product spaces and
Euclidean affine spaces. More specialized results, and results
developed for simplices in general rather than just for triangles, are
in separate files. Definitions and results that make sense in more
general affine spaces rather than just in the Euclidean case go under
`LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace`.
## Implementation notes
Results in this file are generally given in a form with only those
non-degeneracy conditions needed for the particular result, rather
than requiring affine independence of the points of a triangle
unnecessarily.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_cosines
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pons_asinorum
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_angles_of_a_triangle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped CharZero Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on triangles in real inner product spaces
This section develops some results on (possibly degenerate) triangles
in real inner product spaces, where those definitions and results can
most conveniently be developed in terms of vectors and then used to
deduce corresponding results for Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
/-- **Law of cosines** (cosine rule), vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle (x y : V) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) := by
rw [show 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) = 2 * (Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) by ring,
cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_sub_sub_self,
sub_add_eq_add_sub]
/-- **Pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x) := by
refine Real.injOn_cos ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ?_
rw [cos_angle, cos_angle, h, ← neg_sub, norm_neg, neg_sub, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, h, real_inner_comm x y]
/-- **Converse of pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_eq_of_angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_angle_ne_pi {x y : V}
(h : angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x)) (hpi : angle x y ≠ π) : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
replace h := Real.arccos_injOn (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x (x - y)))
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one y (y - x))) h
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy]
· rw [← norm_neg (y - x), neg_sub, mul_comm, mul_comm ‖y‖, div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at h
replace h :=
mul_right_cancel₀ (inv_ne_zero fun hz => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 hz))) h
rw [inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib,
mul_self_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub, ← mul_sub_left_distrib] at h
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, norm_zero, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, zero_sub, neg_eq_zero] at h
rw [hx0, norm_zero, h]
· by_cases hy0 : y = 0
· rw [hy0, norm_zero, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, sub_zero] at h
rw [hy0, norm_zero, h]
· rw [inv_sub_inv (fun hz => hx0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz)) fun hz => hy0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz), ←
neg_sub, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, ← mul_neg_one] at h
symm
by_contra hyx
replace h := (mul_left_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hyx) h).symm
rw [real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, ← angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
exact hpi h
/-- The cosine of the sum of two angles in a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = -Real.cos (angle x y) := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, angle_self hy]
simp
· rw [Real.cos_add, cos_angle, cos_angle, cos_angle]
have hxn : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hx (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hyn : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hy (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hxyn : ‖x - y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 h))
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
have H1 :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ =
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (‖x‖ * ‖x - y‖) *
(Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * (‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖)) := by
ring
have H2 :
⟪x, x⟫ * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, y⟫)) - (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
have H3 :
⟪y, y⟫ * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, x⟫)) - (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
rw [mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib,
H1, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, norm_sub_rev x y, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm,
norm_sub_rev y x, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right,
inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, H2, H3,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (sub_nonneg_of_le (real_inner_mul_inner_self_le x y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp [hxn, hyn, hxyn]`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [sub_div', div_div, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_sub', neg_div', neg_sub, eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
ring
/-- The sine of the sum of two angles in a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = Real.sin (angle x y) := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, angle_self hy]
simp
· rw [Real.sin_add, cos_angle, cos_angle]
have hxn : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hx (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hyn : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hy (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hxyn : ‖x - y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 h))
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
have H1 :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (⟪y, y - x⟫ / (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖ =
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (‖x‖ * ‖x - y‖) * (⟪y, y - x⟫ / (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖y‖ := by
ring
have H2 :
⟪x, x - y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y - x‖) * Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖ =
⟪x, x - y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y - x‖) * (Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖x‖ := by
ring
have H3 :
⟪x, x⟫ * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, y⟫)) - (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
have H4 :
⟪y, y⟫ * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, x⟫)) - (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
rw [right_distrib, right_distrib, right_distrib, right_distrib, H1, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm,
norm_sub_rev x y, H2, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, norm_sub_rev y x,
mul_assoc (Real.sin (angle x y)), sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_left,
inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, H3,
H4, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp [hxn, hyn, hxyn]`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [mul_div_assoc', div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_div,
sub_div', Real.sqrt_div', Real.sqrt_mul_self, add_div', div_add', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
ring
/-- The cosine of the sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem cos_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.cos (angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = -1 := by
rw [add_assoc, Real.cos_add, cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle hx hy,
sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle hx hy, mul_neg, ← neg_add', add_comm, ← sq, ← sq,
Real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
/-- The sine of the sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem sin_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = 0 := by
rw [add_assoc, Real.sin_add, cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle hx hy,
sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle hx hy]
ring
/-- The sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate triangle (where the
two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) = π := by
have hcos := cos_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_neg_one hx hy
have hsin := sin_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_zero hx hy
rw [Real.sin_eq_zero_iff] at hsin
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hsin
symm at hn
have h0 : 0 ≤ angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) :=
add_nonneg (add_nonneg (angle_nonneg _ _) (angle_nonneg _ _)) (angle_nonneg _ _)
have h3lt : angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) < π + π + π := by
by_contra hnlt
have hxy : angle x y = π := by
by_contra hxy
exact hnlt (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_ne
(angle_le_pi _ _) hxy) (angle_le_pi _ _)) (angle_le_pi _ _))
rw [hxy] at hnlt
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at hxy
rcases hxy with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hxr⟩⟩⟩
rw [hxr, ← one_smul ℝ x, ← mul_smul, mul_one, ← sub_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_add_neg,
angle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (add_pos zero_lt_one (neg_pos_of_neg hr)), angle_self hx,
add_zero] at hnlt
apply hnlt
rw [add_assoc]
exact add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt (angle_le_pi _ _) (lt_add_of_pos_right π Real.pi_pos)) _
have hn0 : 0 ≤ n := by
rw [hn, mul_nonneg_iff_left_nonneg_of_pos Real.pi_pos] at h0
norm_cast at h0
have hn3 : n < 3 := by
rw [hn, show π + π + π = 3 * π by ring] at h3lt
replace h3lt := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h3lt (le_of_lt Real.pi_pos)
norm_cast at h3lt
interval_cases n
· simp [hn] at hcos
· norm_num [hn]
· simp [hn] at hcos
end InnerProductGeometry
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on triangles in Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
(possibly degenerate) triangles in Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
open InnerProductGeometry
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- **Law of cosines** (cosine rule), angle-at-point form. -/
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_sub_two_mul_dist_mul_dist_mul_cos_angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) :
dist p₁ p₃ * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ * dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ * dist p₃ p₂ -
2 * dist p₁ p₂ * dist p₃ p₂ * Real.cos (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₂]
unfold angle
convert norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle
(p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂ : V)
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₃ p₂).symm
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₃ p₂).symm
alias law_cos := dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_sub_two_mul_dist_mul_dist_mul_cos_angle
/-- **Isosceles Triangle Theorem**: Pons asinorum, angle-at-point form. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃] at h
unfold angle
convert angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁).symm
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁).symm
/-- Converse of pons asinorum, angle-at-point form. -/
theorem dist_eq_of_angle_eq_angle_of_angle_ne_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂)
(hpi : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ ≠ π) : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃ := by
unfold angle at h hpi
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃]
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hpi
rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁] at h
exact norm_eq_of_angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_angle_ne_pi h hpi
/-- The **sum of the angles of a triangle** (possibly degenerate, where the
given vertex is distinct from the others), angle-at-point. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_add_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h2 : p₂ ≠ p₁) (h3 : p₃ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ + ∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π := by
rw [add_assoc, add_comm, add_comm (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁), angle_comm p₂ p₃ p₁]
unfold angle
rw [← angle_neg_neg (p₁ -ᵥ p₃), ← angle_neg_neg (p₁ -ᵥ p₂), neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₂ p₃ p₁]
exact angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_pi (fun he => h3 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
h2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- The **sum of the angles of a triangle** (possibly degenerate, where the triangle is a line),
oriented angles at point. -/
theorem oangle_add_oangle_add_oangle_eq_pi [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
[Fact (Module.finrank ℝ V = 2)] {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h21 : p₂ ≠ p₁) (h32 : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(h13 : p₁ ≠ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ + ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π := by
simpa only [neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] using
positiveOrientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left (vsub_ne_zero.mpr h21) (vsub_ne_zero.mpr h32)
(vsub_ne_zero.mpr h13)
/-- **Stewart's Theorem**. -/
theorem dist_sq_mul_dist_add_dist_sq_mul_dist (a b c p : P) (h : ∠ b p c = π) :
dist a b ^ 2 * dist c p + dist a c ^ 2 * dist b p =
dist b c * (dist a p ^ 2 + dist b p * dist c p) := by
rw [pow_two, pow_two, law_cos a p b, law_cos a p c,
eq_sub_of_add_eq (angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi a h), Real.cos_pi_sub,
dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi h]
ring
/-- **Apollonius's Theorem**. -/
theorem dist_sq_add_dist_sq_eq_two_mul_dist_midpoint_sq_add_half_dist_sq (a b c : P) :
dist a b ^ 2 + dist a c ^ 2 = 2 * (dist a (midpoint ℝ b c) ^ 2 + (dist b c / 2) ^ 2) := by
by_cases hbc : b = c
· simp [hbc, midpoint_self, dist_self, two_mul]
· let m := midpoint ℝ b c
have : dist b c ≠ 0 := (dist_pos.mpr hbc).ne'
have hm := dist_sq_mul_dist_add_dist_sq_mul_dist a b c m (angle_midpoint_eq_pi b c hbc)
simp only [m, dist_left_midpoint, dist_right_midpoint, Real.norm_two] at hm
calc
dist a b ^ 2 + dist a c ^ 2 = 2 / dist b c * (dist a b ^ 2 *
((2 : ℝ)⁻¹ * dist b c) + dist a c ^ 2 * (2⁻¹ * dist b c)) := by
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [inv_eq_one_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul,
mul_div_assoc', add_div', div_mul_cancel₀, div_div, eq_div_iff]
ring
_ = 2 * (dist a (midpoint ℝ b c) ^ 2 + (dist b c / 2) ^ 2) := by
rw [hm]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [inv_eq_one_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul,
mul_div_assoc', div_div, add_div', div_pow, eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
ring
theorem dist_mul_of_eq_angle_of_dist_mul (a b c a' b' c' : P) (r : ℝ) (h : ∠ a' b' c' = ∠ a b c)
(hab : dist a' b' = r * dist a b) (hcb : dist c' b' = r * dist c b) :
dist a' c' = r * dist a c := by
have h' : dist a' c' ^ 2 = (r * dist a c) ^ 2 := calc
dist a' c' ^ 2 =
dist a' b' ^ 2 + dist c' b' ^ 2 - 2 * dist a' b' * dist c' b' * Real.cos (∠ a' b' c') := by
simp [pow_two, law_cos a' b' c']
_ = r ^ 2 * (dist a b ^ 2 + dist c b ^ 2 - 2 * dist a b * dist c b * Real.cos (∠ a b c)) := by
| rw [h, hab, hcb]; ring
_ = (r * dist a c) ^ 2 := by simp [pow_two, ← law_cos a b c, mul_pow]; ring
by_cases hab₁ : a = b
· have hab'₁ : a' = b' := by
rw [← dist_eq_zero, hab, dist_eq_zero.mpr hab₁, mul_zero r]
rw [hab₁, hab'₁, dist_comm b' c', dist_comm b c, hcb]
· have h1 : 0 ≤ r * dist a b := by rw [← hab]; exact dist_nonneg
have h2 : 0 ≤ r := nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left h1 (dist_pos.mpr hab₁)
exact (sq_eq_sq₀ dist_nonneg (mul_nonneg h2 dist_nonneg)).mp h'
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Triangle.lean | 346 | 362 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Quotient
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The shift on cochain complexes and on the homotopy category
In this file, we show that for any preadditive category `C`, the categories
`CochainComplex C ℤ` and `HomotopyCategory C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` are
equipped with a shift by `ℤ`.
We also show that if `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, then the functors
`F.mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` and
`F.mapHomotopyCategory (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` commute with the shift by `ℤ`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
universe v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
{D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
/-- The shift functor by `n : ℤ` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` which sends a cochain
complex `K` to the complex which is `K.X (i + n)` in degree `i`, and which
multiplies the differentials by `(-1)^n`. -/
@[simps]
def shiftFunctor (n : ℤ) : CochainComplex C ℤ ⥤ CochainComplex C ℤ where
obj K :=
{ X := fun i => K.X (i + n)
d := fun _ _ => n.negOnePow • K.d _ _
d_comp_d' := by
intros
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp, d_comp_d, smul_zero]
shape := fun i j hij => by
rw [K.shape, smul_zero]
intro hij'
apply hij
dsimp at hij' ⊢
omega }
map φ :=
{ f := fun _ => φ.f _
comm' := by
intros
dsimp
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Hom.comm, Linear.units_smul_comp] }
map_id := by intros; rfl
map_comp := by intros; rfl
instance (n : ℤ) : (shiftFunctor C n).Additive where
variable {C}
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m` when `m = i + n`. -/
@[simp]
def shiftFunctorObjXIso (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i m : ℤ) (hm : m = i + n) :
((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m := K.XIsoOfEq hm.symm
section
variable (C)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality
/-- The shift functor by `n` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` identifies to the identity
functor when `n = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorZero' (n : ℤ) (h : n = 0) :
shiftFunctor C n ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by dsimp; simp [h])) (fun _ ↦ by ext; dsimp; simp)
/-- The compatibility of the shift functors on `CochainComplex C ℤ` with respect
to the addition of integers. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorAdd' (n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
shiftFunctor C n₁₂ ≅ shiftFunctor C n₁ ⋙ shiftFunctor C n₂ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by
subst h
dsimp
simp only [add_comm n₁ n₂, Int.negOnePow_add, Linear.units_smul_comp,
Linear.comp_units_smul, d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom, smul_smul, XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d]))
(by intros; ext; dsimp; simp)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq
instance : HasShift (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ := hasShiftMk _ _
{ F := shiftFunctor C
zero := shiftFunctorZero' C _ rfl
add := fun n₁ n₂ => shiftFunctorAdd' C n₁ n₂ _ rfl }
instance (n : ℤ) :
(CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (HomologicalComplex C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)) n).Additive :=
(inferInstance : (CochainComplex.shiftFunctor C n).Additive)
end
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_X' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).X p = K.X (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_map_f' {K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : K ⟶ L) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).map φ).f p = φ.f (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_d' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i j : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).d i j =
n.negOnePow • K.d _ _ := rfl
|
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := by
have : IsIso (((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/Shift.lean | 127 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
The fact that the real numbers are a (trivial) *-ring has similarly been deferred to
`Mathlib/Data/Real/Star.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
theorem ofCauchy_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_inv {f} : (⟨f⁻¹⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨f⟩⁻¹ :=
show _ = inv' _ by rw [inv']
theorem cauchy_zero : (0 : ℝ).cauchy = 0 :=
show zero.cauchy = 0 by rw [zero_def]
theorem cauchy_one : (1 : ℝ).cauchy = 1 :=
show one.cauchy = 1 by rw [one_def]
theorem cauchy_add : ∀ a b, (a + b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy + b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (add _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [add_def]
theorem cauchy_neg : ∀ a, (-a : ℝ).cauchy = -a.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩ => show (neg _).cauchy = _ by rw [neg_def]
theorem cauchy_mul : ∀ a b, (a * b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy * b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (mul _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [mul_def]
theorem cauchy_sub : ∀ a b, (a - b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy - b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← cauchy_neg, ← cauchy_add]
rfl
theorem cauchy_inv : ∀ f, (f⁻¹ : ℝ).cauchy = f.cauchy⁻¹
| ⟨f⟩ => show (inv' _).cauchy = _ by rw [inv']
instance instNatCast : NatCast ℝ where natCast n := ⟨n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast ℝ where intCast z := ⟨z⟩
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℝ where nnratCast q := ⟨q⟩
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℝ where ratCast q := ⟨q⟩
lemma ofCauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : ℝ) = n := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : ℝ) = z := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ).cauchy = n := rfl
lemma cauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : ℝ).cauchy = z := rfl
lemma cauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
instance commRing : CommRing ℝ where
natCast n := ⟨n⟩
intCast z := ⟨z⟩
zero := (0 : ℝ)
one := (1 : ℝ)
mul := (· * ·)
add := (· + ·)
neg := @Neg.neg ℝ _
sub := @Sub.sub ℝ _
npow := @npowRec ℝ ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
nsmul := @nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨@Neg.neg ℝ _⟩ (@nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
zero_add a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
add_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_comm]
add_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_assoc]
mul_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
zero_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
mul_one a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
one_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
mul_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_comm]
mul_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_assoc]
left_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, mul_add]
right_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, add_mul]
neg_add_cancel a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_neg, cauchy_zero]
natCast_zero := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_zero]
natCast_succ n := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_one, cauchy_add]
intCast_negSucc z := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_neg, cauchy_natCast]
/-- `Real.equivCauchy` as a ring equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def ringEquivCauchy : ℝ ≃+* CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
{ equivCauchy with
toFun := cauchy
invFun := ofCauchy
map_add' := cauchy_add
map_mul' := cauchy_mul }
/-! Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution.
These short-circuits have an additional property of ensuring that a computable path is found; if
`Field ℝ` is found first, then decaying it to these typeclasses would result in a `noncomputable`
version of them. -/
instance instRing : Ring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : MonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddLeftCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddRightCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Inhabited ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Make a real number from a Cauchy sequence of rationals (by taking the equivalence class). -/
def mk (x : CauSeq ℚ abs) : ℝ :=
⟨CauSeq.Completion.mk x⟩
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
ext_cauchy_iff.trans CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
private irreducible_def lt : ℝ → ℝ → Prop
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ =>
(Quotient.liftOn₂ x y (· < ·)) fun _ _ _ _ hf hg =>
propext <|
⟨fun h => lt_of_eq_of_lt (Setoid.symm hf) (lt_of_lt_of_eq h hg), fun h =>
lt_of_eq_of_lt hf (lt_of_lt_of_eq h (Setoid.symm hg))⟩
instance : LT ℝ :=
⟨lt⟩
theorem lt_cauchy {f g} : (⟨⟦f⟧⟩ : ℝ) < ⟨⟦g⟧⟩ ↔ f < g :=
show lt _ _ ↔ _ by rw [lt_def]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f < mk g ↔ f < g :=
lt_cauchy
theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = 0 := by rw [← ofCauchy_zero]; rfl
theorem mk_one : mk 1 = 1 := by rw [← ofCauchy_one]; rfl
theorem mk_add {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f + g) = mk f + mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_add]
theorem mk_mul {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f * g) = mk f * mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_mul]
theorem mk_neg {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (-f) = -mk f := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mk_pos {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : 0 < mk f ↔ Pos f := by
rw [← mk_zero, mk_lt]
exact iff_of_eq (congr_arg Pos (sub_zero f))
lemma mk_const {x : ℚ} : mk (const abs x) = x := rfl
private irreducible_def le (x y : ℝ) : Prop :=
x < y ∨ x = y
instance : LE ℝ :=
⟨le⟩
private theorem le_def' {x y : ℝ} : x ≤ y ↔ x < y ∨ x = y :=
iff_of_eq <| le_def _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_le {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f ≤ mk g ↔ f ≤ g := by
simp only [le_def', mk_lt, mk_eq]; rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind_mk {C : Real → Prop} (x : Real) (h : ∀ y, C (mk y)) : C x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Quot.induction_on
exact h _
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {a b : ℝ} (c : ℝ) : c + a < c + b ↔ a < b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp only [mk_lt, ← mk_add]
show Pos _ ↔ Pos _; rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder ℝ where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa using lt_iff_le_not_le
le_refl a := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
rw [mk_le]
le_trans a b c := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simpa using le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa [mk_eq] using CauSeq.le_antisymm
instance : Preorder ℝ := by infer_instance
theorem ratCast_lt {x y : ℚ} : (x : ℝ) < (y : ℝ) ↔ x < y := by
rw [← mk_const, ← mk_const, mk_lt]
exact const_lt
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1 := by
convert ratCast_lt.2 zero_lt_one <;> simp [← ofCauchy_ratCast, ofCauchy_one, ofCauchy_zero]
protected theorem fact_zero_lt_one : Fact ((0 : ℝ) < 1) :=
⟨Real.zero_lt_one⟩
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℝ where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, Real.zero_lt_one.ne⟩
instance instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℝ where
zero_le_one := le_of_lt Real.zero_lt_one
instance instIsOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid ℝ where
add_le_add_left := by
simp only [le_iff_eq_or_lt]
rintro a b ⟨rfl, h⟩
· simp only [lt_self_iff_false, or_false, forall_const]
· exact fun c => Or.inr ((add_lt_add_iff_left c).2 ‹_›)
instance instIsStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing ℝ :=
.of_mul_pos fun a b ↦ by
induction' a using Real.ind_mk with a
induction' b using Real.ind_mk with b
simpa only [mk_lt, mk_pos, ← mk_mul] using CauSeq.mul_pos
instance instIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid ℝ :=
inferInstance
private irreducible_def sup : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊔ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => sup_equiv_sup hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Max ℝ :=
⟨sup⟩
theorem ofCauchy_sup (a b) : (⟨⟦a ⊔ b⟧⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨⟦a⟧⟩ ⊔ ⟨⟦b⟧⟩ :=
show _ = sup _ _ by
rw [sup_def]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sup (a b) : (mk (a ⊔ b) : ℝ) = mk a ⊔ mk b :=
ofCauchy_sup _ _
private irreducible_def inf : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊓ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => inf_equiv_inf hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Min ℝ :=
| ⟨inf⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 388 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
/-!
# Characterizations of weak convergence of finite measures and probability measures
This file will provide portmanteau characterizations of the weak convergence of finite measures
and of probability measures, i.e., the standard characterizations of convergence in distribution.
## Main definitions
The topologies of weak convergence on the types of finite measures and probability measures are
already defined in their corresponding files; no substantial new definitions are introduced here.
## Main results
The main result will be the portmanteau theorem providing various characterizations of the
weak convergence of measures (probability measures or finite measures). Given measures μs
and μ on a topological space Ω, the conditions that will be proven equivalent (under quite
general hypotheses) are:
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly.
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
The separate implications are:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` is the implication (T) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge` is the equivalence (C) ↔ (O).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier` is the implication (O) → (B).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure` is the implication (B) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_of_forall_isOpen_le_liminf` gives the implication (O) → (T) for
any sequence of Borel probability measures.
## Implementation notes
Many of the characterizations of weak convergence hold for finite measures and are proven in that
generality and then specialized to probability measures. Some implications hold with slightly
more general assumptions than in the usual statement of portmanteau theorem. The full portmanteau
theorem, however, is most convenient for probability measures on pseudo-emetrizable spaces with
their Borel sigma algebras.
Some specific considerations on the assumptions in the different implications:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto`, i.e., implication (T) → (C),
assumes that in the underlying topological space, indicator functions of closed sets have
decreasing bounded continuous pointwise approximating sequences. The assumption is in the form
of the type class `HasOuterApproxClosed`. Type class inference knows that for example the more
common assumptions of metrizability or pseudo-emetrizability suffice.
* Where formulations are currently only provided for probability measures, one can obtain the
finite measure formulations using the characterization of convergence of finite measures by
their total masses and their probability-normalized versions, i.e., by
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, convergence in distribution, convergence in law, finite measure,
probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen
/-! ### Portmanteau: limsup condition for closed sets iff liminf condition for open sets
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, the following two conditions are equivalent:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
Either of these will later be shown to be equivalent to the weak convergence of the sequence
of measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E) :
μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [liminf_bot, le_top]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.liminf fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.liminf ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_limsup_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ) :
μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
compl_compl E ▸ le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
theorem limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.limsup fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.limsup ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_liminf_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E :=
compl_compl E ▸ limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One pair of implications of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, the following two are equivalent:
(C) The limsup of the measures of any closed set is at most the measure of the closed set
under a candidate limit measure.
(O) The liminf of the measures of any open set is at least the measure of the open set
under a candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] :
(∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F) ↔
∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G := by
constructor
· intro h G G_open
exact le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
G_open.measurableSet (h Gᶜ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
· intro h F F_closed
exact limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
F_closed.measurableSet (h Fᶜ (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr F_closed))
end LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen -- section
section TendstoOfNullFrontier
/-! ### Portmanteau: limit of measures of Borel sets whose boundary carries no mass in the limit
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, either of the following equivalent conditions:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
implies that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} {E₀ E E₁ : Set Ω} (E₀_subset : E₀ ⊆ E) (subset_E₁ : E ⊆ E₁)
(nulldiff : μ (E₁ \ E₀) = 0) (h_E₀ : μ E₀ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀)
(h_E₁ : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁) ≤ μ E₁) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
apply tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
· have E₀_ae_eq_E : E₀ =ᵐ[μ] E :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm E₀_subset.eventuallyLE
(subset_E₁.eventuallyLE.trans (ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff))
calc
μ E = μ E₀ := measure_congr E₀_ae_eq_E.symm
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀ := h_E₀
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
liminf_le_liminf (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono E₀_subset)
· have E_ae_eq_E₁ : E =ᵐ[μ] E₁ :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm subset_E₁.eventuallyLE
((ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff).trans E₀_subset.eventuallyLE)
calc
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁ :=
limsup_le_limsup (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono subset_E₁)
_ ≤ μ E₁ := h_E₁
_ = μ E := measure_congr E_ae_eq_E₁.symm
· infer_param
· infer_param
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, if the liminf of the measures of any open set is at
least the measure of the open set under a candidate limit measure, then for any set whose
boundary carries no probability mass under the candidate limit measure, then its measures under the
sequence converge to its measure under the candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G) {E : Set Ω}
(E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F :=
limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge.mpr h_opens
tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le interior_subset subset_closure
E_nullbdry (h_opens _ isOpen_interior) (h_closeds _ isClosed_closure)
end TendstoOfNullFrontier --section
section ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: weak convergence implies a limsup condition for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (T) implies also both
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G);
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of finite measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed set is
at most the measure of the closed set under the limit measure.
-/
theorem FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μs : ι → FiniteMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε ε_pos _
have ε_pos' := (ENNReal.half_pos (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr ε_pos.ne.symm)).ne.symm
let fs := F_closed.apprSeq
have key₁ : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, (fs n ω : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) F)) :=
HasOuterApproxClosed.tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq F_closed (μ : Measure Ω)
have room₁ : (μ : Measure Ω) F < (μ : Measure Ω) F + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (measure_lt_top (μ : Measure Ω) F).ne ε_pos'
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp <| key₁.eventually_lt_const room₁
have key₂ := FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mp μs_lim (fs M)
have room₂ :
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) <
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_of_lt ((fs M).lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _)) ε_pos'
have ev_near := key₂.eventually_le_const room₂
have ev_near' := ev_near.mono
(fun n ↦ le_trans (HasOuterApproxClosed.measure_le_lintegral F_closed (μs n) M))
apply (Filter.limsup_le_limsup ev_near').trans
rw [limsup_const]
apply le_trans (add_le_add (hM M rfl.le).le (le_refl (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞)))
simp only [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, le_refl]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed
set is at most the measure of the closed set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
apply FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
((tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds L).mp μs_lim) F_closed
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the liminf of the measures of any open set
is at least the measure of the open set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{G : Set Ω} (G_open : IsOpen G) :
(μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F :=
fun _ F_closed ↦ limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto μs_lim F_closed
le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
(h_closeds _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' {Ω ι : Type*}
{L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
[HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω}
(μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) E) L (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) E)) :=
haveI h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → (μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
fun _ G_open ↦ le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto μs_lim G_open
tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier h_opens E_nullbdry
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that if the boundary of a Borel set
carries no probability mass under the limit measure, then the limit of the measures of the set
equals the measure of the set under the limit probability measure.
A version with coercions to ordinary `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measures is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'`.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have key := tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' μs_lim (by simpa using E_nullbdry)
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (measure_ne_top (↑μ) E)).comp key
end ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: limit condition for Borel sets implies limsup for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B)
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (B) implies also
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
-/
open ENNReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem exists_null_frontier_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) {a b : ℝ}
(hab : a < b) : ∃ r ∈ Ioo a b, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) = 0 := by
have mbles : ∀ r : ℝ, MeasurableSet (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) :=
fun r ↦ isClosed_frontier.measurableSet
have disjs := Metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint s
have key := Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion (μ := μ) mbles disjs
have aux := measure_diff_null (s := Ioo a b) (Set.Countable.measure_zero key volume)
have len_pos : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by simp only [hab, ENNReal.ofReal_pos, sub_pos]
rw [← Real.volume_Ioo, ← aux] at len_pos
rcases nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero len_pos.ne.symm with ⟨r, ⟨r_in_Ioo, hr⟩⟩
refine ⟨r, r_in_Ioo, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt, le_zero_iff] using hr
theorem exists_null_frontiers_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) :
∃ rs : ℕ → ℝ,
Tendsto rs atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ ∀ n, 0 < rs n ∧ μ (frontier (Metric.thickening (rs n) s)) = 0 := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨Rs, ⟨_, ⟨Rs_pos, Rs_lim⟩⟩⟩
have obs := fun n : ℕ => exists_null_frontier_thickening μ s (Rs_pos n)
refine ⟨fun n : ℕ => (obs n).choose, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds Rs_lim
(fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.1.le) fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.2.le
· exact fun n ↦ ⟨(obs n).choose_spec.1.1, (obs n).choose_spec.2⟩
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Assuming that for all Borel sets E whose boundary ∂E carries no probability mass under a
candidate limit probability measure μ we have convergence of the measures μsᵢ(E) to μ(E),
then for all closed sets F we have the limsup condition limsup μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F). -/
lemma limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure
{Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
{μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {μs : ι → Measure Ω}
(h : ∀ {E : Set Ω}, MeasurableSet E → μ (frontier E) = 0 →
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)))
(F : Set Ω) (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
L.limsup (fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_eq_zero', zero_le]
have ex := exists_null_frontiers_thickening μ F
let rs := Classical.choose ex
have rs_lim : Tendsto rs atTop (𝓝 0) := (Classical.choose_spec ex).1
have rs_pos : ∀ n, 0 < rs n := fun n ↦ ((Classical.choose_spec ex).2 n).1
have rs_null : ∀ n, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening (rs n) F)) = 0 :=
fun n ↦ ((Classical.choose_spec ex).2 n).2
have Fthicks_open : ∀ n, IsOpen (Metric.thickening (rs n) F) :=
fun n ↦ Metric.isOpen_thickening
have key := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ h (Fthicks_open n).measurableSet (rs_null n)
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intros ε ε_pos μF_finite
have keyB := tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed (μ := μ) (s := F)
⟨1, ⟨by simp only [gt_iff_lt, zero_lt_one], measure_ne_top _ _⟩⟩ F_closed
have nhd : Iio (μ F + ε) ∈ 𝓝 (μ F) :=
Iio_mem_nhds <| ENNReal.lt_add_right μF_finite.ne (ENNReal.coe_pos.mpr ε_pos).ne'
specialize rs_lim (keyB nhd)
simp only [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, ge_iff_le, mem_preimage, mem_Iio] at rs_lim
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := rs_lim
have aux : (fun i ↦ (μs i F)) ≤ᶠ[L] (fun i ↦ μs i (Metric.thickening (rs m) F)) :=
.of_forall <| fun i ↦ measure_mono (Metric.self_subset_thickening (rs_pos m) F)
refine (limsup_le_limsup aux).trans ?_
rw [Tendsto.limsup_eq (key m)]
apply (measure_mono (Metric.thickening_subset_cthickening (rs m) F)).trans (hm m rfl.le).le
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Assuming that for all Borel sets E whose boundary ∂E carries no probability mass under a
candidate limit probability measure μ we have convergence of the measures μsᵢ(E) to μ(E),
then for all open sets G we have the limsup condition μ(G) ≤ liminf μsᵢ(G). -/
lemma le_liminf_measure_open_of_forall_tendsto_measure
{Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
{μ : Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h : ∀ {E}, MeasurableSet E → μ (frontier E) = 0 → Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)))
(G : Set Ω) (G_open : IsOpen G) :
μ G ≤ L.liminf (fun i ↦ μs i G) := by
apply le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
exact limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure h _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open)
end LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section le_liminf_open_implies_convergence
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: liminf condition for open sets implies weak convergence
In this section we prove for a sequence (μsₙ)ₙ Borel probability measures that
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μsₙ is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfₙ μsₙ(G).
implies
(T) The measures μsₙ converge weakly to the measure μ.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
lemma lintegral_le_liminf_lintegral_of_forall_isOpen_measure_le_liminf_measure
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ℕ → Measure Ω} {f : Ω → ℝ} (f_cont : Continuous f) (f_nn : 0 ≤ f)
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ μs i G)) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂ (μs i)) := by
simp_rw [lintegral_eq_lintegral_meas_lt _ (Eventually.of_forall f_nn) f_cont.aemeasurable]
calc ∫⁻ (t : ℝ) in Set.Ioi 0, μ {a | t < f a}
≤ ∫⁻ (t : ℝ) in Set.Ioi 0, atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ (μs i) {a | t < f a}) := ?_ -- (i)
_ ≤ atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ (t : ℝ) in Set.Ioi 0, (μs i) {a | t < f a}) := ?_ -- (ii)
· -- (i)
exact (lintegral_mono (fun t ↦ h_opens _ (continuous_def.mp f_cont _ isOpen_Ioi))).trans
(le_refl _)
· -- (ii)
exact lintegral_liminf_le (fun n ↦ Antitone.measurable (fun s t hst ↦
measure_mono (fun ω hω ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt hst hω)))
lemma integral_le_liminf_integral_of_forall_isOpen_measure_le_liminf_measure
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ℕ → Measure Ω} [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
{f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ} (f_nn : 0 ≤ f)
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ μs i G)) :
∫ x, (f x) ∂μ ≤ atTop.liminf (fun i ↦ ∫ x, (f x) ∂ (μs i)) := by
have same := lintegral_le_liminf_lintegral_of_forall_isOpen_measure_le_liminf_measure
f.continuous f_nn h_opens
rw [@integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae Ω _ μ f (Eventually.of_forall f_nn)
f.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable]
convert ENNReal.toReal_mono ?_ same
· simp only [fun i ↦ @integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae Ω _ (μs i) f (Eventually.of_forall f_nn)
f.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable]
let g := BoundedContinuousFunction.comp _ Real.lipschitzWith_toNNReal f
| have bound : ∀ i, ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂(μs i) ≤ nndist 0 g := fun i ↦ by
simpa only [coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist, measure_univ, mul_one, ge_iff_le] using
BoundedContinuousFunction.lintegral_le_edist_mul (μ := μs i) g
apply ENNReal.liminf_toReal_eq ENNReal.coe_ne_top (Eventually.of_forall bound)
· apply ne_of_lt
have obs := fun (i : ℕ) ↦ @BoundedContinuousFunction.lintegral_nnnorm_le Ω _ _ (μs i) ℝ _ f
simp only [measure_univ, mul_one] at obs
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (show (‖f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ from ENNReal.coe_lt_top)
apply liminf_le_of_le
· refine ⟨0, .of_forall (by simp only [ge_iff_le, zero_le, forall_const])⟩
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hx.exists
apply le_trans hi
convert obs i with x
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Portmanteau.lean | 496 | 509 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp_assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
end Zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg [NegZeroClass R] {M : Matrix m m R}
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => by rw [neg_apply, hM h, neg_zero]
theorem BlockTriangular.add [AddZeroClass R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
theorem BlockTriangular.sub [SubNegZeroMonoid R]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.sub_apply, hM h, hN h, sub_zero]
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using hM.neg.add ·), hM.add⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.sub hN), (·.add hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.neg.add hM), hM.sub⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.add hN), (·.sub hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.map {S F} [FunLike F R S] [Zero R] [Zero S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(h : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (M.map f) b :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
lemma BlockTriangular.comp [Zero R] {M : Matrix m m (Matrix n n R)} (h : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M.comp m m n n R) fun i ↦ b i.1 :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
theorem blockTriangular_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (d : m → R) : BlockTriangular (diagonal d) b :=
fun _ _ h => diagonal_apply_ne' d fun h' => ne_of_lt h (congr_arg _ h')
theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal' [DecidableEq α] (d : ∀ i : α, Matrix (m' i) (m' i) R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal' d) Sigma.fst := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
apply blockDiagonal'_apply_ne d i' j' fun h' => ne_of_lt h h'.symm
theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal [DecidableEq α] (d : α → Matrix m m R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal d) Prod.snd := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
rw [blockDiagonal'_eq_blockDiagonal, blockTriangular_blockDiagonal']
exact h
variable [DecidableEq m]
theorem blockTriangular_one [One R] : BlockTriangular (1 : Matrix m m R) b :=
blockTriangular_diagonal _
theorem blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix {i j : m} (hij : b i ≤ b j) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (stdBasisMatrix i j c) b := by
intro r s hrs
apply StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact (hij.trans_lt hrs).false
theorem blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix' {i j : m} (hij : b j ≤ b i) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (stdBasisMatrix i j c) (toDual ∘ b) :=
blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix (by exact toDual_le_toDual.mpr hij) _
end Zero
variable [CommRing R] [DecidableEq m]
theorem blockTriangular_transvection {i j : m} (hij : b i ≤ b j) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (transvection i j c) b :=
blockTriangular_one.add (blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix hij c)
theorem blockTriangular_transvection' {i j : m} (hij : b j ≤ b i) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (transvection i j c) (OrderDual.toDual ∘ b) :=
blockTriangular_one.add (blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix' hij c)
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem BlockTriangular.mul [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R]
{M N : Matrix m m R} (hM : BlockTriangular M b)
(hN : BlockTriangular N b) : BlockTriangular (M * N) b := by
intro i j hij
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro k _
by_cases hki : b k < b i
· simp_rw [hM hki, zero_mul]
· simp_rw [hN (lt_of_lt_of_le hij (le_of_not_lt hki)), mul_zero]
end LinearOrder
theorem upper_two_blockTriangular [Zero R] [Preorder α] (A : Matrix m m R) (B : Matrix m n R)
(D : Matrix n n R) {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
BlockTriangular (fromBlocks A B 0 D) (Sum.elim (fun _ => a) fun _ => b) := by
rintro (c | c) (d | d) hcd <;> first | simp [hab.not_lt] at hcd ⊢
/-! ### Determinant -/
variable [CommRing R] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
theorem equiv_block_det (M : Matrix m m R) {p q : m → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : ∀ x, q x ↔ p x) : (toSquareBlockProp M p).det = (toSquareBlockProp M q).det := by
convert Matrix.det_reindex_self (Equiv.subtypeEquivRight e) (toSquareBlockProp M q)
-- Removed `@[simp]` attribute,
-- as the LHS simplifies already to `M.toSquareBlock id i ⟨i, ⋯⟩ ⟨i, ⋯⟩`
theorem det_toSquareBlock_id (M : Matrix m m R) (i : m) : (M.toSquareBlock id i).det = M i i :=
letI : Unique { a // id a = i } := ⟨⟨⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, fun j => Subtype.ext j.property⟩
(det_unique _).trans rfl
theorem det_toBlock (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
M.det =
(fromBlocks (toBlock M p p) (toBlock M p fun j => ¬p j) (toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) p) <|
toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) fun j => ¬p j).det := by
rw [← Matrix.det_reindex_self (Equiv.sumCompl p).symm M]
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
congr; ext σ; congr; ext x
generalize hy : σ x = y
cases x <;> cases y <;>
simp only [Matrix.reindex_apply, toBlock_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inr,
Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inl, fromBlocks_apply₁₁, fromBlocks_apply₁₂, fromBlocks_apply₂₁,
fromBlocks_apply₂₂, Matrix.submatrix_apply]
theorem twoBlockTriangular_det (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
| (h : ∀ i, ¬p i → ∀ j, p j → M i j = 0) :
M.det = (toSquareBlockProp M p).det * (toSquareBlockProp M fun i => ¬p i).det := by
rw [det_toBlock M p]
convert det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ (toBlock M p p) (toBlock M p fun j => ¬p j)
(toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) fun j => ¬p j)
ext i j
exact h (↑i) i.2 (↑j) j.2
theorem twoBlockTriangular_det' (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, ¬p j → M i j = 0) :
M.det = (toSquareBlockProp M p).det * (toSquareBlockProp M fun i => ¬p i).det := by
rw [M.twoBlockTriangular_det fun i => ¬p i, mul_comm]
· congr 1
exact equiv_block_det _ fun _ => not_not.symm
· simpa only [Classical.not_not] using h
protected theorem BlockTriangular.det [DecidableEq α] [LinearOrder α] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
M.det = ∏ a ∈ univ.image b, (M.toSquareBlock b a).det := by
suffices ∀ hs : Finset α, univ.image b = hs → M.det = ∏ a ∈ hs, (M.toSquareBlock b a).det by
exact this _ rfl
intro s hs
induction s using Finset.strongInduction generalizing m with | H s ih =>
subst hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty m
· simp
let k := (univ.image b).max' (univ_nonempty.image _)
rw [twoBlockTriangular_det' M fun i => b i = k]
· have : univ.image b = insert k ((univ.image b).erase k) := by
rw [insert_erase]
apply max'_mem
rw [this, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 220 | 250 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Lean.Meta.CongrTheorems
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Lemmas about units in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
We also define `Ring.inverse`, a globally defined function on any ring
(in fact any `MonoidWithZero`), which inverts units and sends non-units to zero.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered Equiv Subtype.restrict Multiplicative
variable {α M₀ G₀ : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Units
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero monoid with zero represented as an element
of the monoid is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] (u : M₀ˣ) : (u : M₀) ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one u.mul_inv
-- We can't use `mul_eq_zero` + `Units.ne_zero` in the next two lemmas because we don't assume
-- `Nonzero M₀`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : a * u = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_left h ↑u⁻¹, fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h u⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : ↑u * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_right (↑u⁻¹) h, mul_eq_zero_of_right (u : M₀)⟩
end Units
namespace IsUnit
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] {a : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.ne_zero
theorem mul_right_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a * b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.mul_right_eq_zero
theorem mul_left_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (hb : IsUnit b) : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hb
hu ▸ u.mul_left_eq_zero
end IsUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_zero_iff : IsUnit (0 : M₀) ↔ (0 : M₀) = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, a, (a0 : 0 * a = 1), _⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [zero_mul] at a0, fun h =>
@isUnit_of_subsingleton _ _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) 0⟩
theorem not_isUnit_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : ¬IsUnit (0 : M₀) :=
mt isUnit_zero_iff.1 zero_ne_one
namespace Ring
open Classical in
/-- Introduce a function `inverse` on a monoid with zero `M₀`, which sends `x` to `x⁻¹` if `x` is
invertible and to `0` otherwise. This definition is somewhat ad hoc, but one needs a fully (rather
than partially) defined inverse function for some purposes, including for calculus.
Note that while this is in the `Ring` namespace for brevity, it requires the weaker assumption
`MonoidWithZero M₀` instead of `Ring M₀`. -/
noncomputable def inverse : M₀ → M₀ := fun x => if h : IsUnit x then ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) else 0
/-- By definition, if `x` is invertible then `inverse x = x⁻¹`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_unit (u : M₀ˣ) : inverse (u : M₀) = (u⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) := by
rw [inverse, dif_pos u.isUnit, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
theorem inverse_of_isUnit {x : M₀} (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x = ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) := dif_pos h
/-- By definition, if `x` is not invertible then `inverse x = 0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_non_unit (x : M₀) (h : ¬IsUnit x) : inverse x = 0 :=
dif_neg h
theorem mul_inverse_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * inverse x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.mul_inv]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.inv_mul]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * x * inverse x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * inverse x * x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * (inverse x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * (x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * y = z ↔ y = x * z :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_left _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_left _ _ h]⟩
theorem eq_mul_inverse_iff_mul_eq (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit z) : x = y * inverse z ↔ x * z = y :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_right _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_right _ _ h]⟩
variable (M₀)
@[simp]
theorem inverse_one : inverse (1 : M₀) = 1 :=
inverse_unit 1
@[simp]
theorem inverse_zero : inverse (0 : M₀) = 0 := by
nontriviality
exact inverse_non_unit _ not_isUnit_zero
variable {M₀}
end Ring
theorem IsUnit.ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit a → IsUnit (Ring.inverse a)
| ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ ⟨u⁻¹, (Ring.inverse_unit u).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias IsUnit.ring_inverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] protected alias Ring.IsUnit.ringInverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit (Ring.inverse a) ↔ IsUnit a :=
⟨fun h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial M₀
· convert h
· contrapose h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h]
exact not_isUnit_zero
,
IsUnit.ringInverse⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias isUnit_ring_inverse := isUnit_ringInverse
namespace Units
variable [GroupWithZero G₀]
/-- Embed a non-zero element of a `GroupWithZero` into the unit group.
By combining this function with the operations on units,
or the `/ₚ` operation, it is possible to write a division
as a partial function with three arguments. -/
def mk0 (a : G₀) (ha : a ≠ 0) : G₀ˣ :=
⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk0_one (h := one_ne_zero) : mk0 (1 : G₀) h = 1 := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_mk0 {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : (mk0 a h : G₀) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk0_val (u : G₀ˣ) (h : (u : G₀) ≠ 0) : mk0 (u : G₀) h = u :=
Units.ext rfl
theorem mul_inv' (u : G₀ˣ) : u * (u : G₀)⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
theorem inv_mul' (u : G₀ˣ) : (u⁻¹ : G₀) * u = 1 :=
inv_mul_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk0_inj {a b : G₀} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : Units.mk0 a ha = Units.mk0 b hb ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h => Units.ext h⟩
/-- In a group with zero, an existential over a unit can be rewritten in terms of `Units.mk0`. -/
theorem exists0 {p : G₀ˣ → Prop} : (∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g) ↔ ∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p (Units.mk0 g hg) :=
⟨fun ⟨g, pg⟩ => ⟨g, g.ne_zero, (g.mk0_val g.ne_zero).symm ▸ pg⟩,
fun ⟨g, hg, pg⟩ => ⟨Units.mk0 g hg, pg⟩⟩
/-- An alternative version of `Units.exists0`. This one is useful if Lean cannot
figure out `p` when using `Units.exists0` from right to left. -/
theorem exists0' {p : ∀ g : G₀, g ≠ 0 → Prop} :
(∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p g hg) ↔ ∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g g.ne_zero :=
Iff.trans (by simp_rw [val_mk0]) exists0.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_iff_ne_zero {p : G₀ → Prop} : (∃ u : G₀ˣ, p u) ↔ ∃ x ≠ 0, p x := by
simp [exists0]
theorem _root_.GroupWithZero.eq_zero_or_unit (a : G₀) : a = 0 ∨ ∃ u : G₀ˣ, a = u := by
simpa using em _
end Units
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b c : G₀} {m n : ℕ}
theorem IsUnit.mk0 (x : G₀) (hx : x ≠ 0) : IsUnit x :=
(Units.mk0 x hx).isUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff_ne_zero : IsUnit a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(Units.exists_iff_ne_zero (p := (· = a))).trans (by simp)
alias ⟨_, Ne.isUnit⟩ := isUnit_iff_ne_zero
-- Porting note: can't add this attribute?
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/740
-- attribute [protected] Ne.is_unit
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @fun a b h => by
contrapose! h
exact (Units.mk0 a h.1 * Units.mk0 b h.2).ne_zero }
-- Can't be put next to the other `mk0` lemmas because it depends on the
-- `NoZeroDivisors` instance, which depends on `mk0`.
@[simp]
theorem Units.mk0_mul (x y : G₀) (hxy) :
Units.mk0 (x * y) hxy =
Units.mk0 x (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hxy).1 * Units.mk0 y (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hxy).2 := by
ext; rfl
theorem div_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≠ 0 := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_ne_zero ha (inv_ne_zero hb)
@[simp]
theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem div_ne_zero_iff : a / b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
div_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_or
@[simp] lemma div_self (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := h.isUnit.div_self
lemma eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
hc.isUnit.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq
lemma eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
hb.isUnit.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq
lemma inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
ha.isUnit.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul
lemma mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
hb.isUnit.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
lemma mul_inv_eq_one₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := hb.isUnit.mul_inv_eq_one
lemma inv_mul_eq_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := ha.isUnit.inv_mul_eq_one
lemma mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ := hb.isUnit.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv
lemma mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := ha.isUnit.mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq
/-- A variant of `eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by
rwa [← eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀]; rintro rfl; simp [ha] at h
/-- A variant of `eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by
rwa [← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hb] at h
/-- A variant of `inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by
rwa [← inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hc.symm] at h
/-- A variant of `mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀` that moves the nonzero hypothesis to another variable. -/
lemma eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by
rwa [← mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀]; rintro rfl; simp [hb.symm] at h
@[simp] lemma div_mul_cancel₀ (a : G₀) (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b = a := h.isUnit.div_mul_cancel _
lemma mul_one_div_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a * (1 / a) = 1 := h.isUnit.mul_one_div_cancel
lemma one_div_mul_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : 1 / a * a = 1 := h.isUnit.one_div_mul_cancel
lemma div_left_inj' (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c = b / c ↔ a = b := hc.isUnit.div_left_inj
@[field_simps] lemma div_eq_iff (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := hb.isUnit.div_eq_iff
@[field_simps] lemma eq_div_iff (hb : b ≠ 0) : c = a / b ↔ c * b = a := hb.isUnit.eq_div_iff
-- TODO: Swap RHS around
lemma div_eq_iff_mul_eq (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = c ↔ c * b = a := hb.isUnit.div_eq_iff.trans eq_comm
lemma eq_div_iff_mul_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) : a = b / c ↔ a * c = b := hc.isUnit.eq_div_iff
lemma div_eq_of_eq_mul (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = c * b → a / b = c := hb.isUnit.div_eq_of_eq_mul
lemma eq_div_of_mul_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c = b → a = b / c := hc.isUnit.eq_div_of_mul_eq
lemma div_eq_one_iff_eq (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b := hb.isUnit.div_eq_one_iff_eq
lemma div_mul_cancel_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : b / (a * b) = a⁻¹ :=
hb.isUnit.div_mul_cancel_right _
lemma mul_div_mul_right (a b : G₀) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c / (b * c) = a / b :=
hc.isUnit.mul_div_mul_right _ _
-- TODO: Duplicate of `mul_inv_cancel_right₀`
lemma mul_mul_div (a : G₀) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a = a * b * (1 / b) := (hb.isUnit.mul_mul_div _).symm
lemma div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) (a b : G₀) : a / c / (b / c) = a / b := by
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
lemma div_mul_div_cancel₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b * (b / c) = a / c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hb]
lemma div_mul_cancel_of_imp (h : b = 0 → a = 0) : a / b * b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0 <;> simp [*]
lemma mul_div_cancel_of_imp (h : b = 0 → a = 0) : a * b / b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp] lemma divp_mk0 (a : G₀) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a /ₚ Units.mk0 b hb = a / b := divp_eq_div _ _
lemma pow_sub₀ (a : G₀) (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ := by
have h1 : m - n + n = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel h
have h2 : a ^ (m - n) * a ^ n = a ^ m := by rw [← pow_add, h1]
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using eq_div_of_mul_eq (pow_ne_zero _ ha) h2
lemma pow_sub_of_lt (a : G₀) (h : n < m) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_pow (Nat.ne_of_gt <| Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), zero_pow (by omega), zero_mul]
· exact pow_sub₀ _ ha <| Nat.le_of_lt h
lemma inv_pow_sub₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : n ≤ m) : a⁻¹ ^ (m - n) = (a ^ m)⁻¹ * a ^ n := by
rw [pow_sub₀ _ (inv_ne_zero ha) h, inv_pow, inv_pow, inv_inv]
lemma inv_pow_sub_of_lt (a : G₀) (h : n < m) : a⁻¹ ^ (m - n) = (a ^ m)⁻¹ * a ^ n := by
rw [pow_sub_of_lt a⁻¹ h, inv_pow, inv_pow, inv_inv]
lemma zpow_sub₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m / a ^ n := by
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add₀ ha, zpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_natCast₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ (m - n : ℤ) = a ^ m / a ^ n := by
simpa using zpow_sub₀ ha m n
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n - 1 : ℤ) = a ^ n / a := by
simpa using zpow_sub₀ ha n 1
lemma zpow_one_sub_natCast₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (1 - n : ℤ) = a / a ^ n := by
simpa using zpow_sub₀ ha 1 n
lemma zpow_ne_zero {a : G₀} : ∀ n : ℤ, a ≠ 0 → a ^ n ≠ 0
| (_ : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast]; exact pow_ne_zero _
| .negSucc n => fun ha ↦ by rw [zpow_negSucc]; exact inv_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ ha)
lemma eq_zero_of_zpow_eq_zero {n : ℤ} : a ^ n = 0 → a = 0 := not_imp_not.1 (zpow_ne_zero _)
lemma zpow_eq_zero_iff {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_zpow_eq_zero, fun ha => ha.symm ▸ zero_zpow _ hn⟩
lemma zpow_ne_zero_iff {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (zpow_eq_zero_iff hn).ne
lemma zpow_neg_mul_zpow_self (n : ℤ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ^ (-n) * a ^ n = 1 := by
rw [zpow_neg]; exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (zpow_ne_zero n ha)
theorem Ring.inverse_eq_inv (a : G₀) : Ring.inverse a = a⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp
· exact Ring.inverse_unit (Units.mk0 a ha)
@[simp]
theorem Ring.inverse_eq_inv' : (Ring.inverse : G₀ → G₀) = Inv.inv :=
funext Ring.inverse_eq_inv
end GroupWithZero
section CommGroupWithZero
| -- comm
variable [CommGroupWithZero G₀] {a b c d : G₀}
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Basic.lean | 392 | 393 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp] lemma empty_diffs : ∅ \\ t = ∅ := image₂_empty_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_empty : s \\ ∅ = ∅ := image₂_empty_right
| @[simp] lemma diffs_eq_empty : s \\ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := image₂_eq_empty_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 557 | 558 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
| f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 207 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.End
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Order.OrdContinuous
/-!
# Semiconjugate by `sSup`
In this file we prove two facts about semiconjugate (families of) functions.
First, if an order isomorphism `fa : α → α` is semiconjugate to an order embedding `fb : β → β` by
`g : α → β`, then `fb` is semiconjugate to `fa` by `y ↦ sSup {x | g x ≤ y}`, see
`Semiconj.symm_adjoint`.
Second, consider two actions `f₁ f₂ : G → α → α` of a group on a complete lattice by order
isomorphisms. Then the map `x ↦ ⨆ g : G, (f₁ g)⁻¹ (f₂ g x)` semiconjugates each `f₁ g'` to `f₂ g'`,
see `Function.sSup_div_semiconj`. In the case of a conditionally complete lattice, a similar
statement holds true under an additional assumption that each set `{(f₁ g)⁻¹ (f₂ g x) | g : G}` is
bounded above, see `Function.csSup_div_semiconj`.
The lemmas come from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homéomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie
bornée][ghys87:groupes], Proposition 2.1 and 5.4 respectively. In the paper they are formulated for
homeomorphisms of the circle, so in order to apply results from this file one has to lift these
homeomorphisms to the real line first.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Finset
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Set
/-- We say that `g : β → α` is an order right adjoint function for `f : α → β` if it sends each `y`
to a least upper bound for `{x | f x ≤ y}`. If `α` is a partial order, and `f : α → β` has
a right adjoint, then this right adjoint is unique. -/
def IsOrderRightAdjoint [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :=
∀ y, IsLUB { x | f x ≤ y } (g y)
theorem isOrderRightAdjoint_sSup [CompleteSemilatticeSup α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) :
IsOrderRightAdjoint f fun y => sSup { x | f x ≤ y } := fun _ => isLUB_sSup _
theorem isOrderRightAdjoint_csSup [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β)
(hne : ∀ y, ∃ x, f x ≤ y) (hbdd : ∀ y, BddAbove { x | f x ≤ y }) :
IsOrderRightAdjoint f fun y => sSup { x | f x ≤ y } := fun y => isLUB_csSup (hne y) (hbdd y)
namespace IsOrderRightAdjoint
protected theorem unique [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α}
(h₁ : IsOrderRightAdjoint f g₁) (h₂ : IsOrderRightAdjoint f g₂) : g₁ = g₂ :=
funext fun y => (h₁ y).unique (h₂ y)
theorem right_mono [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : IsOrderRightAdjoint f g) :
Monotone g := fun y₁ y₂ hy => ((h y₁).mono (h y₂)) fun _ hx => le_trans hx hy
theorem orderIso_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : IsOrderRightAdjoint f g) (e : β ≃o γ) : IsOrderRightAdjoint (e ∘ f) (g ∘ e.symm) :=
fun y => by simpa [e.le_symm_apply] using h (e.symm y)
theorem comp_orderIso [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : IsOrderRightAdjoint f g) (e : γ ≃o α) : IsOrderRightAdjoint (f ∘ e) (e.symm ∘ g) := by
intro y
change IsLUB (e ⁻¹' { x | f x ≤ y }) (e.symm (g y))
rw [e.isLUB_preimage, e.apply_symm_apply]
exact h y
| end IsOrderRightAdjoint
namespace Function
/-- If an order automorphism `fa` is semiconjugate to an order embedding `fb` by a function `g`
and `g'` is an order right adjoint of `g` (i.e. `g' y = sSup {x | f x ≤ y}`), then `fb` is
| Mathlib/Order/SemiconjSup.lean | 73 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
/-!
# The structure of `Fintype (Fin n)`
This file contains some basic results about the `Fintype` instance for `Fin`,
especially properties of `Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)`.
-/
open List (Vector)
open Finset
open Fintype
namespace Fin
variable {α β : Type*} {n : ℕ}
theorem map_valEmbedding_univ : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).map Fin.valEmbedding = Iio n := by
ext
simp [orderIsoSubtype.symm.surjective.exists, OrderIso.symm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_zero_eq_map : Ioi (0 : Fin n.succ) = univ.map (Fin.succEmb _) :=
coe_injective <| by ext; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_last_eq_map : Iio (Fin.last n) = Finset.univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb :=
coe_injective <| by ext; simp [lt_def]
theorem Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) : Ioi i.succ = (Ioi i).map (Fin.succEmb _) := by simp
theorem Iio_castSucc (i : Fin n) : Iio (castSucc i) = (Iio i).map Fin.castSuccEmb := by simp
theorem card_filter_univ_succ (p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#{x | p x} = if p 0 then #{x | p (.succ x)} + 1 else #{x | p (.succ x)} := by
rw [Fin.univ_succ, filter_cons, apply_ite Finset.card, card_cons, filter_map, card_map]; rfl
theorem card_filter_univ_succ' (p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#{x | p x} = ite (p 0) 1 0 + #{x | p (.succ x)}:= by
rw [card_filter_univ_succ]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
theorem card_filter_univ_eq_vector_get_eq_count [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (v : List.Vector α n) :
#{i | v.get i = a} = v.toList.count a := by
induction' v with n x xs hxs
· simp
· simp_rw [card_filter_univ_succ', Vector.get_cons_zero, Vector.toList_cons, Vector.get_cons_succ,
hxs, List.count_cons, add_comm (ite (x = a) 1 0), beq_iff_eq]
end Fin
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Fin.lean | 67 | 70 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
/-!
# Lemma about subtraction in ordered monoids with a top element adjoined.
This file introduces a subtraction on `WithTop α` when `α` has a subtraction and a bottom element,
given by `x - ⊤ = ⊥` and `⊤ - x = ⊤`. This will be instantiated mostly for `ℕ∞` and `ℝ≥0∞`, where
the bottom element is zero.
Note that there is another subtraction on objects of the form `WithTop α` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.WithTop`, setting `-⊤ = ⊤` as this corresponds to the additivization
of the usual convention `0⁻¹ = 0` and is relevant in valuation theory. Since this other instance
is only registered for `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α` (which doesn't have a bottom element, unless
the group is trivial), this shouldn't create diamonds.
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace WithTop
section
variable [Sub α] [Bot α]
/-- If `α` has a subtraction and a bottom element, we can extend the subtraction to `WithTop α`, by
setting `x - ⊤ = ⊥` and `⊤ - x = ⊤`. -/
protected def sub : ∀ _ _ : WithTop α, WithTop α
| _, ⊤ => (⊥ : α)
| ⊤, (x : α) => ⊤
| (x : α), (y : α) => (x - y : α)
instance : Sub (WithTop α) :=
⟨WithTop.sub⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub {a b : α} : (↑(a - b) : WithTop α) = ↑a - ↑b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_sub_coe {a : α} : (⊤ : WithTop α) - a = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_top {a : WithTop α} : a - ⊤ = (⊥ : α) := by cases a <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_eq_top_iff {a b : WithTop α} : a - b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∧ b ≠ ⊤ := by
induction a <;> induction b <;>
simp only [← coe_sub, coe_ne_top, sub_top, zero_ne_top, top_sub_coe, false_and, Ne,
not_true_eq_false, not_false_eq_true, and_false, and_self]
lemma sub_ne_top_iff {a b : WithTop α} : a - b ≠ ⊤ ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by simp [or_iff_not_imp_left]
|
protected
theorem map_sub [Sub β] [Bot β] {f : α → β} (h : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (h₀ : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
∀ x y : WithTop α, (x - y).map f = x.map f - y.map f
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Sub/WithTop.lean | 58 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
zero_pow hb0, smul_zero, zero_mul, smul_zero]
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_contra! h'
replace hroot := hroot _ h'
simp only [IsRoot, eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity] at hroot
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Nat.cast_dvd_cast (α := R) <| Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h'
rw [hq, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors] at hnzd
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd.1] at hroot
exact eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t h hroot
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
apply lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot
clear hroot
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
exact Submonoid.one_mem _
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors]
exact ⟨hnzd _ le_rfl n.succ_ne_zero, ih fun m h ↦ hnzd m (h.trans n.le_succ)⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| hm.trans_lt hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hr hnzd⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors' h hr hnzd⟩
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ 1, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h
(by rw [Nat.factorial_one, Nat.cast_one]; exact Submonoid.one_mem _)
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ p.IsRoot t ∧ (derivative p).IsRoot t := by
rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative h]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h 0 (by norm_num), h 1 (by norm_num)⟩, fun ⟨h0, h1⟩ m hm ↦ ?_⟩
obtain (_|_|m) := m
exacts [h0, h1, by omega]
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_gcd
[GCDMonoid R[X]] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ (gcd p (derivative p)).IsRoot t := by
simp_rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot h, ← dvd_iff_isRoot, dvd_gcd_iff]
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root [CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : p.IsRoot t) :
p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· rw [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
exact derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hpt <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt).ne'
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity [CharZero R] (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_cases h : p.IsRoot t
· exact (derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root h).symm.le
· rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_zero h, zero_tsub]
exact zero_le _
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative h hr⟩
/-- A sufficient condition for the set of roots of a nonzero polynomial `f` to be a subset of the
set of roots of `g` is that `f` divides `f.derivative * g`. Over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, this is also a necessary condition.
See `isRoot_of_isRoot_iff_dvd_derivative_mul` -/
theorem isRoot_of_isRoot_of_dvd_derivative_mul [CharZero R] {f g : R[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0)
(hfd : f ∣ f.derivative * g) {a : R} (haf : f.IsRoot a) : g.IsRoot a := by
rcases hfd with ⟨r, hr⟩
have hdf0 : derivative f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! haf
rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero haf] at hf0 ⊢
exact not_isRoot_C _ _ <| C_ne_zero.mp hf0
by_contra hg
have hdfg0 : f.derivative * g ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hdf0 (by rintro rfl; simp at hg)
have hr' := congr_arg (rootMultiplicity a) hr
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul hdfg0, derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root haf,
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero hg, add_zero, rootMultiplicity_mul (hr ▸ hdfg0), add_comm,
Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos hf0).2 haf))] at hr'
omega
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
instance instNormalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid R[X] where
normUnit p :=
⟨C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff), C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff)⁻¹, by
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1], by rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.inv_mul, C_1]⟩
normUnit_zero := Units.ext (by simp)
normUnit_mul hp0 hq0 :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at *
rw [leadingCoeff_mul, normUnit_mul hp0 hq0, Units.val_mul, C_mul])
normUnit_coe_units u :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [← mul_one u⁻¹, Units.val_mul, Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq]
rcases Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 ⟨u, rfl⟩ with ⟨_, ⟨w, rfl⟩, h2⟩
rw [← h2, leadingCoeff_C, normUnit_coe_units, ← C_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem coe_normUnit {p : R[X]} : (normUnit p : R[X]) = C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff) := by
simp [normUnit]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_normalize (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (normalize p) = normalize (leadingCoeff p) := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem Monic.normalize_eq_self {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : normalize p = p := by
simp only [Polynomial.coe_normUnit, normalize_apply, hp.leadingCoeff, normUnit_one,
Units.val_one, Polynomial.C.map_one, mul_one]
theorem roots_normalize {p : R[X]} : (normalize p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [normalize_apply, mul_comm, coe_normUnit, roots_C_mul _ (normUnit (leadingCoeff p)).ne_zero]
theorem normUnit_X : normUnit (X : Polynomial R) = 1 := by
have := coe_normUnit (R := R) (p := X)
rwa [leadingCoeff_X, normUnit_one, Units.val_one, map_one, Units.val_eq_one] at this
theorem X_eq_normalize : (X : Polynomial R) = normalize X := by
simp only [normalize_apply, normUnit_X, Units.val_one, mul_one]
end NormalizationMonoid
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_pos_of_ne_zero_of_nonunit (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hp : ¬IsUnit p) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hp0 hp
exact hp (IsUnit.map C (IsUnit.mk0 (coeff p 0) (mt C_inj.2 (by simpa using hp0))))
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [Polynomial.ext_iff]
congr!
simp [map_eq_zero, coeff_map, coeff_zero]
theorem map_ne_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
p.degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map _ f)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
simp only [← coeff_natDegree, coeff_map f, natDegree_map]
theorem monic_map_iff [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} {p : R[X]} :
(p.map f).Monic ↔ p.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_map, ← f.map_one, Function.Injective.eq_iff f.injective, Monic]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero : IsUnit p ↔ degree p = 0 :=
⟨degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit, fun h =>
have : degree p ≤ 0 := by simp [*, le_refl]
have hc : coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := fun hc => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, hc] at h; simp only [map_zero] at h; contradiction
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2
⟨C (coeff p 0)⁻¹, by
conv in p => rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this]
rw [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc, C_1]⟩⟩
/-- Division of polynomials. See `Polynomial.divByMonic` for more details. -/
def div (p q : R[X]) :=
C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹))
/-- Remainder of polynomial division. See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for more details. -/
def mod (p q : R[X]) :=
p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)
private theorem quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux (p q : R[X]) : q * div p q + mod p q = p := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, mod, modByMonic_zero, zero_add]
· conv =>
rhs
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv h)]
rw [div, mod, add_comm, mul_assoc]
private theorem remainder_lt_aux (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree (mod p q) < degree q := by
rw [← degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
exact degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq)
instance : Div R[X] :=
⟨div⟩
instance : Mod R[X] :=
⟨mod⟩
theorem div_def : p / q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) :=
rfl
theorem mod_def : p % q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := rfl
theorem modByMonic_eq_mod (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p % q :=
show p %ₘ q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, mul_one, C_1]
theorem divByMonic_eq_div (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = p / q :=
show p /ₘ q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, C_1, one_mul, mul_one]
theorem mod_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p % (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
modByMonic_eq_mod p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval _ _
theorem mul_div_eq_iff_isRoot : (X - C a) * (p / (X - C a)) = p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
divByMonic_eq_div p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot
instance instEuclideanDomain : EuclideanDomain R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.commRing,
Polynomial.nontrivial with
quotient := (· / ·)
quotient_zero := by simp [div_def]
remainder := (· % ·)
r := _
r_wellFounded := degree_lt_wf
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux
remainder_lt := fun _ _ hq => remainder_lt_aux _ hq
mul_left_not_lt := fun _ _ hq => not_lt_of_ge (degree_le_mul_left _ hq) }
theorem mod_eq_self_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p % q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) ≤ degree p :=
not_le_of_gt <| by rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
rw [mod_def, modByMonic, dif_pos (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
simp only [this, false_and, if_false]⟩
theorem div_eq_zero_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p / q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q
rwa [h, mul_zero, zero_add, mod_eq_self_iff hq0] at this,
fun h => by
have hlt : degree p < degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := by
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
have hm : Monic (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0
rw [div_def, (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hm).2 hlt, mul_zero]⟩
theorem degree_add_div (hq0 : q ≠ 0) (hpq : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p / q) = degree p := by
have : degree (p % q) < degree (q * (p / q)) :=
calc
degree (p % q) < degree q := EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0
_ ≤ _ := degree_le_mul_left _ (mt (div_eq_zero_iff hq0).1 (not_lt_of_ge hpq))
conv_rhs =>
rw [← EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_mul]
theorem degree_div_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p / q) ≤ degree p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq]; exact degree_divByMonic_le _ _
theorem degree_div_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : 0 < degree q) : degree (p / q) < degree p := by
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := fun hq0 => by simp [hq0] at hq
rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]
exact degree_divByMonic_lt _ (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0) hp
(by rw [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]; exact hq)
theorem isUnit_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsUnit (p.map f) ↔ IsUnit p := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero, degree_map]
theorem map_div [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p / q).map f = p.map f / q.map f := by
if hq0 : q = 0 then simp [hq0]
else
rw [div_def, div_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_divByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0),
Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, leadingCoeff_map, map_inv₀]
theorem map_mod [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p % q).map f = p.map f % q.map f := by
by_cases hq0 : q = 0
· simp [hq0]
· rw [mod_def, mod_def, leadingCoeff_map f, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C f, ← Polynomial.map_mul f,
map_modByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
lemma natDegree_mod_lt [Field k] (p : k[X]) {q : k[X]} (hq : q.natDegree ≠ 0) :
(p % q).natDegree < q.natDegree := by
have hq' : q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
simp [hq]
rw [mod_def]
refine (natDegree_modByMonic_lt p ?_ ?_).trans_le ?_
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rw [mul_inv_eq_one₀ hq']
· contrapose! hq
rw [← natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((inv_mul_eq_one₀ hq').mpr rfl)]
simp [hq]
· exact natDegree_mul_C_le q q.leadingCoeff⁻¹
section
open EuclideanDomain
theorem gcd_map [Field k] [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq k] (f : R →+* k) :
gcd (p.map f) (q.map f) = (gcd p q).map f :=
GCD.induction p q (fun x => by simp_rw [Polynomial.map_zero, EuclideanDomain.gcd_zero_left])
fun x y _ ih => by rw [gcd_val, ← map_mod, ih, ← gcd_val]
end
theorem eval₂_gcd_eq_zero [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} (hf : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0)
(hg : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
rw [EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_gcd_ab f g, Polynomial.eval₂_add, Polynomial.eval₂_mul,
Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hf, hg, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem eval_gcd_eq_zero [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R}
(hf : f.eval α = 0) (hg : g.eval α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval α = 0 :=
eval₂_gcd_eq_zero hf hg
theorem root_left_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_right_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_gcd_iff_root_left_right [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ↔ f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ∧ g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨root_left_of_root_gcd h, root_right_of_root_gcd h⟩, fun h => eval₂_gcd_eq_zero h.1 h.2⟩
theorem isRoot_gcd_iff_isRoot_left_right [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).IsRoot α ↔ f.IsRoot α ∧ g.IsRoot α :=
root_gcd_iff_root_left_right
theorem isCoprime_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsCoprime (p.map f) (q.map f) ↔ IsCoprime p q := by
classical
rw [← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, ← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, gcd_map, isUnit_map]
theorem mem_roots_map [CommRing k] [IsDomain k] {f : R →+* k} {x : k} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots (map_ne_zero hp), IsRoot, Polynomial.eval_map]
theorem rootSet_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).rootSet S = {0} := by
classical
rw [rootSet, aroots_monomial ha,
Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton]
theorem rootSet_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : rootSet (C a * X ^ n) S = {0} := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, rootSet_monomial hn ha]
theorem rootSet_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).rootSet S = {0} := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n : R[X]), ← C_1, rootSet_C_mul_X_pow hn]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem rootSet_prod [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X])
(s : Finset ι) (h : s.prod f ≠ 0) : (s.prod f).rootSet S = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).rootSet S := by
classical
simp only [rootSet, aroots, ← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [Polynomial.map_prod, roots_prod, Finset.bind_toFinset, s.val_toFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_prod, Ne, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X - C b).roots = {a⁻¹ * b} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X + C b).roots = {-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : p.roots = {-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0)} := by
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (show degree p ≤ 1 by rw [h])]
have : p.coeff 1 ≠ 0 := coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree h
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C _ this]
theorem exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
⟨-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0), by
rw [← mem_roots (by simp [← zero_le_degree_iff, h])]
simp [roots_degree_eq_one h]⟩
theorem coeff_inv_units (u : R[X]ˣ) (n : ℕ) : ((↑u : R[X]).coeff n)⁻¹ = (↑u⁻¹ : R[X]).coeff n := by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u), eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u⁻¹),
coeff_C, coeff_C, inv_eq_one_div]
split_ifs
· rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq (coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero u), coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero,
coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, ← eval_mul, ← Units.val_mul, inv_mul_cancel]
simp
· simp
theorem monic_normalize [DecidableEq R] (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : Monic (normalize p) := by
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← isUnit_iff_ne_zero] at hp0
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_normalize, normalize_eq_one]
apply hp0
theorem leadingCoeff_div (hpq : q.degree ≤ p.degree) :
(p / q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff / q.leadingCoeff := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C,
leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq) _, mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
theorem div_C_mul : p / (C a * q) = C a⁻¹ * (p / q) := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
simp only [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, mul_inv, leadingCoeff_C, C.map_mul, mul_assoc]
congr 3
rw [mul_left_comm q, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_dvd (ha : a ≠ 0) : C a * p ∣ q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun h => dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) h, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm p, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul, hr]⟩⟩
theorem dvd_C_mul (ha : a ≠ 0) : p ∣ Polynomial.C a * q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_left_comm p, ← hr, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul]⟩,
fun h => dvd_trans h (dvd_mul_left _ _)⟩
theorem coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero [DecidableEq R] (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(normUnit p : R[X]) = C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp
simp [CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ this]
theorem map_dvd_map' [Field k] (f : R →+* k) {x y : R[X]} : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero, zero_dvd_iff, zero_dvd_iff, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
· classical
rw [← normalize_dvd_iff, ← @normalize_dvd_iff R[X], normalize_apply, normalize_apply,
coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero H, coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero (mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 H),
leadingCoeff_map, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C, ← Polynomial.map_mul,
map_dvd_map _ f.injective (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv H)]
@[simp]
theorem degree_normalize [DecidableEq R] : degree (normalize p) = degree p := by
simp [normalize_apply]
theorem prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Prime p := by
classical
have : Prime (normalize p) :=
Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 ▸ degree_normalize)
(monic_normalize fun hp0 => absurd hp1 (hp0.symm ▸ by simp [degree_zero]))
exact (normalize_associated _).prime this
theorem irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Irreducible p :=
(prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
theorem not_irreducible_C (x : R) : ¬Irreducible (C x) := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, C_0]
exact not_irreducible_zero
· exact fun hx => hx.not_isUnit <| isUnit_C.2 <| isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 H
theorem degree_pos_of_irreducible (hp : Irreducible p) : 0 < p.degree :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hp0 =>
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hp0
not_irreducible_C (p.coeff 0) <| this ▸ hp
theorem X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic {K : Type*} [Ring K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
(X - C a) * (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = f - f %ₘ (X - C a) := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div]
exact monic_X_sub_C a
theorem divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative
{K : Type*} [CommRing K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
f /ₘ (X - C a) + (X - C a) * derivative (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = derivative f := by
have key := by apply congrArg derivative <| X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic f a
simpa only [derivative_mul, derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_C, sub_zero, one_mul,
modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval] using key
theorem X_sub_C_dvd_derivative_of_X_sub_C_dvd_divByMonic {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) {a : K}
(hf : (X - C a) ∣ f /ₘ (X - C a)) : X - C a ∣ derivative f := by
have key := divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative f a
have ⟨u,hu⟩ := hf
rw [← key, hu, ← mul_add (X - C a) u _]
use (u + derivative ((X - C a) * u))
/-- If `f` is a polynomial over a field, and `a : K` satisfies `f' a ≠ 0`,
then `f / (X - a)` is coprime with `X - a`.
Note that we do not assume `f a = 0`, because `f / (X - a) = (f - f a) / (X - a)`. -/
theorem isCoprime_of_is_root_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) (a : K)
| (hf' : f.derivative.eval a ≠ 0) : IsCoprime (X - C a : K[X]) (f /ₘ (X - C a)) := by
classical
refine Or.resolve_left
(EuclideanDomain.dvd_or_coprime (X - C a) (f /ₘ (X - C a))
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 614 | 617 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
· cases h1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· exact (h2 (Monotone.map_bddBelow coe_mono h's)).elim
· rw [preimage_image_eq]
exact Option.some_injective _
theorem WithTop.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
change _ = ite _ _ _
rw [if_neg, preimage_image_eq, if_pos hs]
· exact Option.some_injective _
· rintro ⟨x, _, ⟨⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem WithBot.sSup_empty [SupSet α] : sSup (∅ : Set (WithBot α)) = ⊥ :=
WithTop.sInf_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sInf' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sSup' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
end
instance ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] :
LinearOrder α :=
{ ‹ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α› with
min_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂]
max_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of sInf and sSup in a complete lattice. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice α :=
{ ‹CompleteLattice α› with
le_csSup := by intros; apply le_sSup; assumption
csSup_le := by intros; apply sSup_le; assumption
csInf_le := by intros; apply sInf_le; assumption
le_csInf := by intros; apply le_sInf; assumption }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot {α : Type*}
[h : CompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α :=
{ CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice, h with
csSup_empty := sSup_empty
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderTop.bddAbove s)).elim
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderBot.bddBelow s)).elim }
namespace OrderDual
instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instInf α, OrderDual.instSup α, OrderDual.instLattice α with
le_csSup := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le (α := α)
csSup_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf (α := α)
le_csInf := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le (α := α)
csInf_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup (α := α) }
instance (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instConditionallyCompleteLattice α, OrderDual.instLinearOrder α with
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow (α := α)
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove (α := α) }
end OrderDual
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_csSup (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ sSup s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_le (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ sInf s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csSup_of_le (hs : BddAbove s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_csSup hs hb)
theorem csInf_le_of_le (hs : BddBelow s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (csInf_le hs hb) h
theorem csSup_le_csSup (ht : BddAbove t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
csSup_le hs fun _ ha => le_csSup ht (h ha)
theorem csInf_le_csInf (ht : BddBelow t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_csInf hs fun _ ha => csInf_le ht (h ha)
theorem le_csSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le hs hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem csInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_csInf hs hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => csInf_le h⟩
theorem isLUB_csSup (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ => le_csSup H, fun _ => csSup_le ne⟩
theorem isGLB_csInf (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => csInf_le H, fun _ => le_csInf ne⟩
theorem IsLUB.csSup_eq (H : IsLUB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sSup s = a :=
(isLUB_csSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_eq (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s = a :=
H.isLUB.csSup_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_mem (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s ∈ s :=
H.csSup_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem IsGLB.csInf_eq (H : IsGLB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = a :=
(isGLB_csInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
theorem IsLeast.csInf_eq (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s = a :=
H.isGLB.csInf_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsLeast.csInf_mem (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s ∈ s :=
H.csInf_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem subset_Icc_csInf_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) : s ⊆ Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
fun _ hx => ⟨csInf_le hb hx, le_csSup ha hx⟩
theorem csSup_le_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup hs hb)
theorem le_csInf_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_csInf hs hb)
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sSup (lowerBounds s) = sInf s :=
(isLUB_csSup h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isGLB_csInf hs h).isLUB
theorem csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sInf (upperBounds s) = sSup s :=
(isGLB_csInf h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isLUB_csSup hs h).isGLB
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddBelow (range f)) :
sSup (lowerBounds (range f)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem csInf_upperBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
sInf (upperBounds (range f)) = ⨆ i, f i :=
csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) (hs : BddBelow s) : x ∉ s :=
fun hx => lt_irrefl _ (h.trans_le (csInf_le hs hx))
theorem not_mem_of_csSup_lt {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : sSup s < x) (hs : BddAbove s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (hs : s.Nonempty) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(H' : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(eq_of_le_of_not_lt (csSup_le hs H)) fun hb =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := H' _ hb
lt_irrefl _ <| ha'.trans_le <| le_csSup ⟨b, H⟩ ha
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
s.Nonempty → (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- `b < sSup s` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, when `s` is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem lt_csSup_of_lt (hs : BddAbove s) (ha : a ∈ s) (h : b < a) : b < sSup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_csSup hs ha)
/-- `sInf s < b` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, when `s` is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem csInf_lt_of_lt : BddBelow s → a ∈ s → a < b → sInf s < b :=
lt_csSup_of_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
theorem exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.Nonempty) (tne : t.Nonempty)
(hst : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : (upperBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t).Nonempty :=
⟨sInf t, fun x hx => le_csInf tne <| hst x hx, fun _ hy => csInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/-- The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_singleton (a : α) : sSup {a} = a :=
isGreatest_singleton.csSup_eq
/-- The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_singleton (a : α) : sInf {a} = a :=
isLeast_singleton.csInf_eq
theorem csSup_pair (a b : α) : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair _ _ a b).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
theorem csInf_pair (a b : α) : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair _ _ a b).csInf_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
/-- If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum. -/
theorem csInf_le_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_csInf ne hb) (isLUB_csSup ne ha) ne
/-- The `sSup` of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the
assumptions that all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_union (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddAbove t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).union (isLUB_csSup tne ht)).csSup_eq sne.inl
/-- The `sInf` of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem csInf_union (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddBelow t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
csSup_union (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne ht tne
/-- The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_inter_le (hs : BddAbove s) (ht : BddAbove t) (hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
(csSup_le hst) fun _ hx => le_inf (le_csSup hs hx.1) (le_csSup ht hx.2)
/-- The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem le_csInf_inter :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
csSup_inter_le (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- The supremum of `insert a s` is the maximum of `a` and the supremum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded above. -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_insert (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).insert a).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of `insert a s` is the minimum of `a` and the infimum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded below. -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_insert (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
csSup_insert (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sInf (Icc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ici : sInf (Ici a) = a :=
isLeast_Ici.csInf_eq
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ico (h : a < b) : sInf (Ico a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioc [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sInf (Ioi a) = a :=
csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt nonempty_Ioi (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioo h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sSup (Icc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ico [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ico a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ico h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iic : sSup (Iic a) = a :=
isGreatest_Iic.csSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iio [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sSup (Iio a) = a :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt nonempty_Iio (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioo h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that
1) `b` is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound `b'` satisfies `b ≤ b'`. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_is_forall_le_of_forall_le_imp_ge (hs : s.Nonempty) (h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h_b_le_ub : ∀ ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → b ≤ ub) : sSup s = b :=
(csSup_le hs h_is_ub).antisymm ((h_b_le_ub _) fun _ => le_csSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
lemma sup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] (h : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_csSup (OrderTop.bddAbove s) h
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] (h : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
instance Pi.conditionallyCompleteLattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, ConditionallyCompleteLattice (α i)] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (∀ i, α i) :=
{ Pi.instLattice, Pi.supSet, Pi.infSet with
le_csSup := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
le_csSup ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
csSup_le := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(csSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i
csInf_le := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
csInf_le ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
le_csInf := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(le_csInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i }
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- When `b < sSup s`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : b < sSup s) : ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := by
contrapose! hb
exact csSup_le hs hb
/-- When `sInf s < b`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_csInf_lt (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : sInf s < b) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) hs hb
theorem lt_csSup_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_csSup hs hb
theorem csInf_lt_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_csInf hs hb
@[simp] lemma csSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs
@[simp] lemma ciSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup ∅ :=
csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
lemma csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup univ := by
rw [csSup_of_not_bddAbove hs, csSup_of_not_bddAbove (s := univ)]
contrapose! hs
exact hs.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma ciSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove hf
@[simp] lemma csInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs
@[simp] lemma ciInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf ∅ :=
csInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
lemma csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
lemma ciInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf univ :=
csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same supremum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup s = sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|s_ne
· have : t = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun y yt ↦ by simpa using ht y yt)
rw [this]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with rfl|t_ne
· have : s = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x xs ↦ by simpa using hs x xs)
rw [this]
by_cases B : BddAbove s ∨ BddAbove t
· have Bs : BddAbove s := by
rcases B with hB|⟨b, hb⟩
· exact hB
· refine ⟨b, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (hb hy)
have Bt : BddAbove t := by
rcases B with ⟨b, hb⟩|hB
· refine ⟨b, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, hx, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (hb hx)
· exact hB
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le s_ne (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (le_csSup Bt yt)
· apply csSup_le t_ne (fun y hy ↦ ?_)
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, xs, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (le_csSup Bs xs)
· simp [csSup_of_not_bddAbove, (not_or.1 B).1, (not_or.1 B).2]
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same infimum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csInf_eq_csInf_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf s = sInf t :=
csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ht
lemma sSup_iUnion_Iic (f : ι → α) : sSup (⋃ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = ⨆ i, f i := by
apply csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le
· rintro x ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, hi⟩
· rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_iUnion_of_mem i le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
lemma sInf_iUnion_Ici (f : ι → α) : sInf (⋃ (i : ι), Ici (f i)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
sSup_iUnion_Iic (α := αᵒᵈ) f
theorem csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) hs
theorem csSup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
open Function
variable [WellFoundedLT α]
theorem sInf_eq_argmin_on (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = argminOn id s hs :=
IsLeast.csInf_eq ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun _ ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem isLeast_csInf (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLeast s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_argmin_on hs]
exact ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun a ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff' (hs : s.Nonempty) : b ≤ sInf s ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
le_isGLB_iff (isLeast_csInf hs).isGLB
theorem csInf_mem (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isLeast_csInf hs).1
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
theorem Monotone.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Lemmas about a conditionally complete linear order with bottom element
In this case we have `Sup ∅ = ⊥`, so we can drop some `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions.
-/
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
@[simp]
theorem csInf_univ [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [OrderBot α] : sInf (univ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.csInf_eq
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : (sSup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.csSup_empty
theorem isLUB_csSup' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [csSup_empty, isLUB_empty]
· exact isLUB_csSup hne hs
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `csSup_le_iff`. -/
theorem csSup_le_iff' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) {a : α} : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup' hs)
theorem csSup_le' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ upperBounds s) : sSup s ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' ⟨a, h⟩).2 h
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `lt_csSup_iff`. -/
theorem lt_csSup_iff' (hb : BddAbove s) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simpa only [not_le, not_forall₂, exists_prop] using (csSup_le_iff' hb).not
theorem le_csSup_iff' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : BddAbove s) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le' hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff'' {s : Set α} {a : α} (ne : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b : α, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
le_csInf_iff (OrderBot.bddBelow _) ne
theorem csInf_le' (h : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a := csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) h
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a < sSup s) : ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
contrapose! h
exact csSup_le' h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf' {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf h (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem csInf_le_csInf' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : t.Nonempty) (h₂ : t ⊆ s) : sInf s ≤ sInf t :=
csInf_le_csInf (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le_csSup' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove t) (h₂ : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl | h
· rw [csSup_empty]
exact bot_le
· exact csSup_le_csSup h₁ h h₂
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
namespace WithTop
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α]
/-- The `sSup` of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isLUB_sSup' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· contradiction
apply coe_le_coe.2
exact le_csSup h₂ ha
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact False.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h₁))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exact absurd hb h₁
· exact ⟨b, hb⟩
· intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_rfl
· exfalso
apply h₂
use b
intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs
· simp [sSup]
· exact isLUB_sSup' hs
/-- The `sInf` of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isGLB_sInf' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro a ha
exact top_le_iff.2 (Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csInf_le ?_ ha)
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exfalso
apply h
intro c hc
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← top_le_iff]
exact hb hc
use b
intro c hc
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb hc)
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exfalso
apply h
intro b hb
exact Set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb))
· refine coe_le_coe.2 (le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· classical
contrapose! h
rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact mem_singleton ⊤
· exact (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim
· intro b hb
rw [← coe_le_coe]
exact ha hb
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
by_cases hs : BddBelow s
· exact isGLB_sInf' hs
· exfalso
apply hs
use ⊥
intro _ _
exact bot_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop α) where
__ := linearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra
le_sSup s := (isLUB_sSup s).1
sSup_le s := (isLUB_sSup s).2
le_sInf s := (isGLB_sInf s).2
sInf_le s := (isGLB_sInf s).1
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sSup'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set α} (hb : BddAbove s) : ↑(sSup s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sSup' hb, sSup_image]
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sInf'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sInf' hs h's, sInf_image]
end WithTop
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : Monotone f)
include h_mono
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`sSup` and `sInf`. -/
theorem le_csSup_image {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddAbove s) :
f c ≤ sSup (f '' s) :=
le_csSup (map_bddAbove h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
theorem csSup_image_le {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ upperBounds s) :
sSup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
csSup_le (Nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upperBounds_image hB)
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem csInf_image_le {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddBelow s) :
sInf (f '' s) ≤ f c := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact le_csSup_image (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hcs h_bdd
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem le_csInf_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ lowerBounds s) :
f B ≤ sInf (f '' s) := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact csSup_image_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hs hB
end Monotone
lemma MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddBelow (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf (f '' s) = sInf (f '' t) := by
obtain rfl | hs := Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· obtain rfl : t = ∅ := by simpa [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] using h
rfl
apply le_antisymm _ (csInf_le_csInf ht (hs.image _) (image_subset _ hst))
refine le_csInf ((hs.mono hst).image f) ?_
simp only [mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro a ha
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hxa⟩ := h a ha
exact csInf_le_of_le (ht.mono (image_subset _ hst)) ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩ (hf (hst hxs) ha hxa)
lemma MonotoneOn.csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddAbove (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup (f '' s) = sSup (f '' t) :=
MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) ht hf.dual hst h
/-!
### Supremum/infimum of `Set.image2`
A collection of lemmas showing what happens to the suprema/infima of `s` and `t` when mapped under
a binary function whose partial evaluations are lower/upper adjoints of Galois connections.
-/
section
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
variable {l u : α → β → γ} {l₁ u₁ : β → γ → α} {l₂ u₂ : α → γ → β}
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s)
(ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddAbove t) : sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sSup t) := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [csSup_le_iff (hs₁.image2 (fun _ => (h₁ _).monotone_l) (fun _ => (h₂ _).monotone_l) ht₁)
(hs₀.image2 ht₀),
forall_mem_image2, forall₂_swap, (h₂ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff ht₁ ht₀]
simp_rw [← (h₂ _).le_iff_le, (h₁ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff hs₁ hs₀]
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
| csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (u₁ := l₁) (u₂ := l₂)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) fun _ => (h₂ _).dual
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 848 | 849 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun _ _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsIsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, then any point in one of the sets has
a corresponding point at distance `< r` in the other set. -/
theorem exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffEdist s t < r) :
∃ y ∈ t, edist x y < r :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp <|
calc
infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem h
_ < r := H
/-- The distance from `x` to `s` or `t` is controlled in terms of the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t`. -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist :
infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t :=
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => by
have ε0 : (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x s < infEdist x s + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).1.ne ε0
obtain ⟨y : α, ys : y ∈ s, dxy : edist x y < infEdist x s + ↑ε / 2⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
have : hausdorffEdist s t < hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).2.ne ε0
obtain ⟨z : α, zt : z ∈ t, dyz : edist y z < hausdorffEdist s t + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt ys this
calc
infEdist x t ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zt
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x s + ε / 2 + (hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2) := add_le_add dxy.le dyz.le
_ = infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t + ε := by
simp [ENNReal.add_halves, add_comm, add_left_comm]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffEdist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, iSup_image, infEdist_image h]
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_ediam (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
hausdorffEdist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist ?_ ?_
· intro z hz
exact ⟨y, yt, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_left hz) (subset_union_right yt)⟩
· intro z hz
exact ⟨x, xs, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_right hz) (subset_union_left xs)⟩
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_triangle : hausdorffEdist s u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
constructor
· show ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xs =>
calc
infEdist x u ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs) _
· show ∀ x ∈ u, infEdist x s ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xu =>
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist u t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xu) _
_ = hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm, add_comm]
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they have the same closure. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, ENNReal.sup_eq_zero, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero, ← subset_def,
← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, subset_antisymm_iff, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self_closure : hausdorffEdist s (closure s) = 0 := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, closure_closure]
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₁ : hausdorffEdist (closure s) t = hausdorffEdist s t := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist (closure s) s + hausdorffEdist s t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist s t := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm]
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s (closure s) + hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := by simp
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₂ : hausdorffEdist s (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp [@hausdorffEdist_comm _ _ s _]
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between sets or their closures is the same. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure : hausdorffEdist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp
/-- Two closed sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ s = t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
/-- The Haudorff edistance to the empty set is infinite. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_empty (ne : s.Nonempty) : hausdorffEdist s ∅ = ∞ := by
rcases ne with ⟨x, xs⟩
have : infEdist x ∅ ≤ hausdorffEdist s ∅ := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs
simpa using this
/-- If a set is at finite Hausdorff edistance of a nonempty set, it is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (hs : s.Nonempty) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
t.Nonempty :=
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.resolve_left fun ht ↦ fin (ht.symm ▸ hausdorffEdist_empty hs)
theorem empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
(s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅) ∨ (s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· exact Or.inl ⟨hs, ht⟩
· rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact Or.inr ⟨nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top ht fin, ht⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hs, nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top hs fin⟩
end HausdorffEdist
-- section
end EMetric
/-! Now, we turn to the same notions in metric spaces. To avoid the difficulties related to
`sInf` and `sSup` on `ℝ` (which is only conditionally complete), we use the notions in `ℝ≥0∞`
formulated in terms of the edistance, and coerce them to `ℝ`.
Then their properties follow readily from the corresponding properties in `ℝ≥0∞`,
modulo some tedious rewriting of inequalities from one to the other. -/
--namespace
namespace Metric
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s t u : Set α} {x y : α} {Φ : α → β}
open EMetric
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set -/
def infDist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (infEdist x s)
theorem infDist_eq_iInf : infDist x s = ⨅ y : s, dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infEdist, iInf_subtype', ENNReal.toReal_iInf]
· simp only [dist_edist]
· exact fun _ ↦ edist_ne_top _ _
/-- The minimal distance is always nonnegative -/
theorem infDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ infDist x s := toReal_nonneg
/-- The minimal distance to the empty set is 0 (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.infEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`) -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_empty : infDist x ∅ = 0 := by simp [infDist]
lemma isGLB_infDist (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsGLB ((dist x ·) '' s) (infDist x s) := by
simpa [infDist_eq_iInf, sInf_image']
using isGLB_csInf (hs.image _) ⟨0, by simp [lowerBounds, dist_nonneg]⟩
/-- In a metric space, the minimal edistance to a nonempty set is finite. -/
theorem infEdist_ne_top (h : s.Nonempty) : infEdist x s ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases h with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy)
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_eq_top_iff : infEdist x s = ∞ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [*, Nonempty.ne_empty, infEdist_ne_top]
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set containing it vanishes. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [infEdist_zero_of_mem h, infDist]
/-- The minimal distance to a singleton is the distance to the unique point in this singleton. -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_singleton : infDist x {y} = dist x y := by simp [infDist, dist_edist]
/-- The minimal distance to a set is bounded by the distance to any point in this set. -/
theorem infDist_le_dist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infDist x s ≤ dist x y := by
rw [dist_edist, infDist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h)
/-- The minimal distance is monotone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x t ≤ infDist x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono (infEdist_ne_top hs) (infEdist_anti h)
lemma le_infDist {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : r ≤ infDist x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → r ≤ dist x y := by
simp_rw [infDist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (infEdist_ne_top hs), le_infEdist,
ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _), ← dist_edist]
/-- The minimal distance to a set `s` is `< r` iff there exists a point in `s` at distance `< r`. -/
theorem infDist_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
simp [← not_le, le_infDist hs]
/-- The minimal distance from `x` to `s` is bounded by the distance from `y` to `s`, modulo
the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_add_dist : infDist x s ≤ infDist y s + dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infDist, dist_edist]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_add' infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist ?_ (flip absurd (edist_ne_top _ _))
simp only [infEdist_eq_top_iff, imp_self]
theorem not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist (h : dist x y < infDist x s) : y ∉ s := fun hy =>
h.not_le <| infDist_le_dist_of_mem hy
theorem disjoint_ball_infDist : Disjoint (ball x (infDist x s)) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _y hy => not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist <| mem_ball'.1 hy
theorem ball_infDist_subset_compl : ball x (infDist x s) ⊆ sᶜ :=
(disjoint_ball_infDist (s := s)).subset_compl_right
theorem ball_infDist_compl_subset : ball x (infDist x sᶜ) ⊆ s :=
ball_infDist_subset_compl.trans_eq (compl_compl s)
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist {r : ℝ} (h : r < infDist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s :=
disjoint_ball_infDist.mono_left <| closedBall_subset_ball h
theorem dist_le_infDist_add_diam (hs : IsBounded s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ infDist x s + diam s := by
rw [infDist, diam, dist_edist]
exact toReal_le_add (edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam hy) (infEdist_ne_top ⟨y, hy⟩) hs.ediam_ne_top
variable (s)
/-- The minimal distance to a set is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infDist_pt : LipschitzWith 1 (infDist · s) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
/-- The minimal distance to a set is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infDist_pt : UniformContinuous (infDist · s) :=
(lipschitz_infDist_pt s).uniformContinuous
/-- The minimal distance to a set is continuous in point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infDist_pt : Continuous (infDist · s) :=
(uniformContinuous_infDist_pt s).continuous
variable {s}
/-- The minimal distances to a set and its closure coincide. -/
theorem infDist_closure : infDist x (closure s) = infDist x s := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_closure]
/-- If a point belongs to the closure of `s`, then its infimum distance to `s` equals zero.
The converse is true provided that `s` is nonempty, see `Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero`. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem_closure (hx : x ∈ closure s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
rw [← infDist_closure]
exact infDist_zero_of_mem hx
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ closure s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, infDist, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, infEdist_ne_top h]
theorem infDist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ closure s ↔ 0 < infDist x s :=
(mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs).not.trans infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne.symm
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∈ s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by rw [← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs, h.closure_eq]
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ s ↔ 0 < infDist x s := by
simp [h.mem_iff_infDist_zero hs, infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne]
theorem continuousAt_inv_infDist_pt (h : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ (infDist x s)⁻¹) x := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [infDist_empty, continuousAt_const]
· refine (continuous_infDist_pt s).continuousAt.inv₀ ?_
rwa [Ne, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs]
/-- The infimum distance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem infDist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infDist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infDist x t := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_image hΦ]
theorem infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) :
infDist x (s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x)) = infDist x s := by
replace h : y ∈ s ∩ closedBall x (dist y x) := ⟨h, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (infDist_le_infDist_of_subset inter_subset_left ⟨y, h⟩)
refine not_lt.1 fun hlt => ?_
rcases (infDist_lt_iff ⟨y, h.1⟩).mp hlt with ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩
rcases le_or_lt (dist z x) (dist y x) with hle | hlt
· exact hz.not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem ⟨hzs, hle⟩)
· rw [dist_comm z, dist_comm y] at hlt
exact (hlt.trans hz).not_le (infDist_le_dist_of_mem h)
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infDist_eq_dist (h : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y :=
let ⟨y, hys, hy⟩ := h.exists_infEdist_eq_edist hne x
⟨y, hys, by rw [infDist, dist_edist, hy]⟩
theorem _root_.IsClosed.exists_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (h : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(x : α) : ∃ y ∈ s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
rcases hne with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [← infDist_inter_closedBall_of_mem hz]
set t := s ∩ closedBall x (dist z x)
have htc : IsCompact t := (isCompact_closedBall x (dist z x)).inter_left h
have htne : t.Nonempty := ⟨z, hz, mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, ⟨hys, -⟩, hyd⟩ : ∃ y ∈ t, infDist x t = dist x y := htc.exists_infDist_eq_dist htne x
exact ⟨y, hys, hyd⟩
theorem exists_mem_closure_infDist_eq_dist [ProperSpace α] (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ closure s, infDist x s = dist x y := by
simpa only [infDist_closure] using isClosed_closure.exists_infDist_eq_dist hne.closure x
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set as a `ℝ≥0` -/
def infNndist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0 :=
ENNReal.toNNReal (infEdist x s)
@[simp]
theorem coe_infNndist : (infNndist x s : ℝ) = infDist x s :=
rfl
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith 1 fun x => infNndist x s :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : UniformContinuous fun x => infNndist x s :=
(lipschitz_infNndist_pt s).uniformContinuous
/-- The minimal distance to a set (as `ℝ≥0`) is continuous in point -/
theorem continuous_infNndist_pt (s : Set α) : Continuous fun x => infNndist x s :=
(uniformContinuous_infNndist_pt s).continuous
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff distance between two sets is the smallest nonnegative `r` such that each set is
included in the `r`-neighborhood of the other. If there is no such `r`, it is defined to
be `0`, arbitrarily. -/
def hausdorffDist (s t : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (hausdorffEdist s t)
/-- The Hausdorff distance is nonnegative. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ hausdorffDist s t := by simp [hausdorffDist]
/-- If two sets are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff
edistance. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(bs : IsBounded s) (bt : IsBounded t) : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨ct, hct⟩
rcases bs.subset_closedBall ct with ⟨rs, hrs⟩
rcases bt.subset_closedBall cs with ⟨rt, hrt⟩
have : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (max rs rt) := by
apply hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
· intro x xs
exists ct, hct
have : dist x ct ≤ max rs rt := le_trans (hrs xs) (le_max_left _ _)
rwa [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff]
exact le_trans dist_nonneg this
· intro x xt
exists cs, hcs
have : dist x cs ≤ max rs rt := le_trans (hrt xt) (le_max_right _ _)
rwa [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff]
exact le_trans dist_nonneg this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top this
/-- The Hausdorff distance between a set and itself is zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_self_zero : hausdorffDist s s = 0 := by simp [hausdorffDist]
/-- The Hausdorff distances from `s` to `t` and from `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_comm : hausdorffDist s t = hausdorffDist t s := by
simp [hausdorffDist, hausdorffEdist_comm]
/-- The Hausdorff distance to the empty set vanishes (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.hausdorffEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`). -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_empty : hausdorffDist s ∅ = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hausdorffDist, hausdorffEdist_empty h]
/-- The Hausdorff distance to the empty set vanishes (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.hausdorffEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`). -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffDist_empty' : hausdorffDist ∅ s = 0 := by simp [hausdorffDist_comm]
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff distance by bounding the distance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_of_infDist {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infDist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infDist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ r := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rwa [hs, hausdorffDist_empty']
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· rwa [ht, hausdorffDist_empty]
have : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r := by
apply hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist _ _
· simpa only [infDist, ← ENNReal.le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le (infEdist_ne_top ht) hr] using H1
· simpa only [infDist, ← ENNReal.le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le (infEdist_ne_top hs) hr] using H2
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal hr this
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff distance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_of_mem_dist {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, dist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ r := by
apply hausdorffDist_le_of_infDist hr
· intro x xs
rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infDist_le_dist_of_mem yt) hy
· intro x xt
rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infDist_le_dist_of_mem ys) hy
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffDist_le_diam (hs : s.Nonempty) (bs : IsBounded s) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(bt : IsBounded t) : hausdorffDist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffDist_le_of_mem_dist diam_nonneg ?_ ?_
· exact fun z hz => ⟨y, yt, dist_le_diam_of_mem (bs.union bt) (subset_union_left hz)
(subset_union_right yt)⟩
· exact fun z hz => ⟨x, xs, dist_le_diam_of_mem (bs.union bt) (subset_union_right hz)
(subset_union_left xs)⟩
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infDist_le_hausdorffDist_of_mem (hx : x ∈ s) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
infDist x t ≤ hausdorffDist s t :=
toReal_mono fin (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem hx)
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, any point in one of the sets is at distance
`< r` of a point in the other set. -/
theorem exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt {r : ℝ} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffDist s t < r)
(fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) : ∃ y ∈ t, dist x y < r := by
have r0 : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_lt hausdorffDist_nonneg H
have : hausdorffEdist s t < ENNReal.ofReal r := by
rwa [hausdorffDist, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (le_of_lt r0),
ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal fin ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top] at H
rcases exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt h this with ⟨y, hy, yr⟩
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff r0] at yr
exact ⟨y, hy, yr⟩
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, any point in one of the sets is at distance
`< r` of a point in the other set. -/
theorem exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt' {r : ℝ} (h : y ∈ t) (H : hausdorffDist s t < r)
(fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
rw [hausdorffDist_comm] at H
rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
| simpa [dist_comm] using exists_dist_lt_of_hausdorffDist_lt h H fin
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 735 | 735 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Coherent
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformApproximation
/-!
# Topology and uniform structure of uniform convergence
This files endows `α → β` with the topologies / uniform structures of
- uniform convergence on `α`
- uniform convergence on a specified family `𝔖` of sets of `α`, also called `𝔖`-convergence
Since `α → β` is already endowed with the topologies and uniform structures of pointwise
convergence, we introduce type aliases `UniformFun α β` (denoted `α →ᵤ β`) and
`UniformOnFun α β 𝔖` (denoted `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`) and we actually endow *these* with the structures
of uniform and `𝔖`-convergence respectively.
Usual examples of the second construction include :
- the topology of compact convergence, when `𝔖` is the set of compacts of `α`
- the strong topology on the dual of a topological vector space (TVS) `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of
Von Neumann bounded subsets of `E`
- the weak-* topology on the dual of a TVS `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of singletons of `E`.
This file contains a lot of technical facts, so it is heavily commented, proofs included!
## Main definitions
* `UniformFun.gen`: basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence. These are sets
of the form `S(V) := {(f, g) | ∀ x : α, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for some `V : Set (β × β)`
* `UniformFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of uniform convergence. This is the
`UniformSpace` on `α →ᵤ β` whose uniformity is generated by the sets `S(V)` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`.
We will denote this uniform space as `𝒰(α, β, uβ)`, both in the comments and as a local notation
in the Lean code, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, where
`𝔖 : Set (Set α)`. This is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback of `𝒰 S β` by the map of
restriction to `S`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure
on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval`: evaluation is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformFun.t2Space`: the topology of uniform convergence on `α →ᵤ β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂.
* `UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly`: `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` is
indeed the uniform structure of uniform convergence
* `UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem`: evaluation at a point contained in a
set of `𝔖` is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`
* `UniformOnFun.t2Space_of_covering`: the topology of `𝔖`-convergence on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂ and `𝔖` covers `α`
* `UniformOnFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn`:
`𝒱(α, β, 𝔖 uβ)` is indeed the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence
### Functoriality and compatibility with product of uniform spaces
In order to avoid the need for filter bases as much as possible when using these definitions,
we develop an extensive API for manipulating these structures abstractly. As usual in the topology
section of mathlib, we first state results about the complete lattices of `UniformSpace`s on
fixed types, and then we use these to deduce categorical-like results about maps between two
uniform spaces.
We only describe these in the harder case of `𝔖`-convergence, as the names of the corresponding
results for uniform convergence can easily be guessed.
#### Order statements
* `UniformOnFun.mono`: let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and
`𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and `𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`.
* `UniformOnFun.iInf_eq`: if `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i)`.
* `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`: if `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁)`.
An interesting note about these statements is that they are proved without ever unfolding the basis
definition of the uniform structure of uniform convergence! Instead, we build a
(not very interesting) Galois connection `UniformFun.gc` and then rely on the Galois
connection API to do most of the work.
#### Morphism statements (unbundled)
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous`: if `f : γ → β` is uniformly
continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is uniformly continuous.
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing`: if `f : γ → β` is a uniform
inducing, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform inducing.
* `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`: let `f : γ → α`, `𝔖 : Set (Set α)`,
`𝔗 : Set (Set γ)`, and assume that `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, f '' T ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the function
`(fun g ↦ g ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β)` is uniformly continuous.
#### Isomorphism statements (bundled)
* `UniformOnFun.congrRight`: turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by post-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.congrLeft`: turn a bijection `e : γ ≃ α` such that we have both
`∀ T ∈ 𝔗, e '' T ∈ 𝔖` and `∀ S ∈ 𝔖, e ⁻¹' S ∈ 𝔗` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by pre-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformEquivPiComm`: the natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i`
and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform isomorphism between `α →ᵤ[𝔖] (Π i, δ i)` and
`Π i, α →ᵤ[𝔖] δ i`.
#### Important use cases
* If `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` is a uniform group: since `(/) : G × G → G` is
uniformly continuous, `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous` tells us that
`((/) ∘ —) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G × G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is uniformly continuous. By precomposing with
`UniformOnFun.uniformEquivProdArrow`, this gives that
`(/) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is also uniformly continuous
* The transpose of a continuous linear map is continuous for the strong topologies: since
continuous linear maps are uniformly continuous and map bounded sets to bounded sets,
this is just a special case of `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`.
## TODO
* Show that the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence is exactly the structure of `𝔖'`-convergence,
where `𝔖'` is the ***noncovering*** bornology (i.e ***not*** what `Bornology` currently refers
to in mathlib) generated by `𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
uniform convergence
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set Topology
open scoped Uniformity
section TypeAlias
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence. We denote it `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → β
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence on some family `𝔖` of subsets of `α`. We denote it `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def UniformOnFun (α β : Type*) (_ : Set (Set α)) :=
α → β
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ " β:0 => UniformFun α β
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ[" 𝔖 "] " β:0 => UniformOnFun α β 𝔖
open UniformConvergence
variable {α β : Type*} {𝔖 : Set (Set α)}
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun.ofFun : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.ofFun (𝔖) : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformFun.toFun : (α →ᵤ β) ≃ (α → β) :=
UniformFun.ofFun.symm
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.toFun (𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ (α → β) :=
(UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖).symm
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun (ofFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ β) : ofFun (toFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun 𝔖 (ofFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) : ofFun 𝔖 (toFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
-- Note: we don't declare a `CoeFun` instance because Lean wouldn't insert it when writing
-- `f x` (because of definitional equality with `α → β`).
end TypeAlias
open UniformConvergence
namespace UniformFun
variable (α β : Type*) {γ ι : Type*}
variable {p : Filter ι}
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence: `gen α β V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)`
of functions `α →ᵤ β` such that `∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. -/
protected def gen (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β) | ∀ x, (toFun uv.1 x, toFun uv.2 x) ∈ V }
/-- If `𝓕` is a filter on `β × β`, then the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` is a filter basis on `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to `𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when
`β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for any filter in
order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint (see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝓑 : Filter <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun V : Set (β × β) => V ∈ 𝓑) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
⟨⟨univ, univ_mem⟩, @fun U V hU hV =>
⟨U ∩ V, inter_mem hU hV, fun _ huv => ⟨fun x => (huv x).left, fun x => (huv x).right⟩⟩⟩
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` as a bundled `FilterBasis` over `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to
`𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when `β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for
any filter in order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint
(see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected def basis (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : FilterBasis ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β 𝓕).filterBasis
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the filter generated by the filter basis
`UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕`. For `𝓕 = 𝓤 β`, this will be the uniformity of uniform
convergence on `α`. -/
protected def filter (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).filter
--local notation "Φ" => fun (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) =>
--(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
protected def phi (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) : β × β :=
(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
set_option quotPrecheck false -- Porting note: error message suggested to do this
/- This is a lower adjoint to `UniformFun.filter` (see `UniformFun.gc`).
The exact definition of the lower adjoint `l` is not interesting; we will only use that it exists
(in `UniformFun.mono` and `UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
local notation "lowerAdjoint" => fun 𝓐 => map (UniformFun.phi α β) (𝓐 ×ˢ ⊤)
/-- The function `UniformFun.filter α β : Filter (β × β) → Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β))`
has a lower adjoint `l` (in the sense of `GaloisConnection`). The exact definition of `l` is not
interesting; we will only use that it exists (in `UniformFun.mono` and
`UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection lowerAdjoint fun 𝓕 => UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 := by
intro 𝓐 𝓕
symm
calc
𝓐 ≤ UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 ↔ (UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).sets ⊆ 𝓐.sets := by
rw [UniformFun.filter, ← FilterBasis.generate, le_generate_iff]
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕, UniformFun.gen α β U ∈ 𝓐 := image_subset_iff
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uv | ∀ x, (uv, x) ∈ { t : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (t.1.1 t.2, t.1.2 t.2) ∈ U } } ∈
𝓐 :=
Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (uvx.1.1 uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2) ∈ U } ∈
𝓐 ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall₂_congr fun U _hU => mem_prod_top.symm
_ ↔ lowerAdjoint 𝓐 ≤ 𝓕 := Iff.rfl
variable [UniformSpace β]
/-- Core of the uniform structure of uniform convergence. -/
protected def uniformCore : UniformSpace.Core (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis (UniformFun.basis α β (𝓤 β))
(fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ _ => hVU ▸ fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hV)
(fun _ ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
⟨UniformFun.gen α β (Prod.swap ⁻¹' V), ⟨Prod.swap ⁻¹' V, tendsto_swap_uniformity hV, rfl⟩,
fun _ huv x => huv x⟩)
fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
let ⟨W, hW, hWV⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hV
⟨UniformFun.gen α β W, ⟨W, hW, rfl⟩, fun _ ⟨w, huw, hwv⟩ x => hWV ⟨w x, ⟨huw x, hwv x⟩⟩⟩
/-- Uniform structure of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
We will denote it `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` in the rest of this file. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.ofCore (UniformFun.uniformCore α β)
/-- Topology of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstance
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- By definition, the uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}`
for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis (· ∈ 𝓤 β) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β (𝓤 β)).hasBasis
/-- The uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as
a filter basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β` (in the case `𝓑 = (𝓤 β).as_basis` this is true by
definition). -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) : (𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis p (UniformFun.gen α β ∘ s) :=
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).to_hasBasis
(fun _ hU =>
let ⟨i, hi, hiU⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp hU
⟨i, hi, fun _ huv x => hiU (huv x)⟩)
fun i hi => ⟨s i, h.mem_of_mem hi, subset_refl _⟩
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter
basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis p fun i => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β (s i) } :=
nhds_basis_uniformity' (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β h)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a
filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun V => V ∈ 𝓤 β) fun V => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V } :=
UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β f (Filter.basis_sets _)
variable {α}
/-- Evaluation at a fixed point is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval (x : α) :
UniformContinuous (Function.eval x ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → β) := by
change _ ≤ _
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).le_basis_iff ((𝓤 _).basis_sets.comap _)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv => huv x⟩
variable {β}
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_gen {β} {f g : α →ᵤ β} {V : Set (β × β)} :
(f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V ↔ ∀ x, (toFun f x, toFun g x) ∈ V :=
.rfl
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ` and `u₁ ≤ u₂`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono : Monotone (@UniformFun.uniformSpace α γ) := fun _ _ hu =>
(UniformFun.gc α γ).monotone_u hu
/-- If `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)`. -/
protected theorem iInf_eq {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} : 𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
ext : 1
change UniformFun.filter α γ 𝓤[⨅ i, u i] = 𝓤[⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)]
rw [iInf_uniformity, iInf_uniformity]
exact (UniformFun.gc α γ).u_iInf
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem inf_eq {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} :
𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
rw [inf_eq_iInf, inf_eq_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
cases i <;> rfl
/-- Post-composition by a uniform inducing function is
a uniform inducing function for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniform inducing,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is uniform inducing. -/
lemma postcomp_isUniformInducing [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).comap _).eq_of_same_basis <|
UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ (hf.basis_uniformity (𝓤 β).basis_sets)⟩
/-- Post-composition by a uniform embedding is
a uniform embedding for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform embedding,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is a uniform embedding. -/
protected theorem postcomp_isUniformEmbedding [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
IsUniformEmbedding (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) where
toIsUniformInducing := UniformFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing hf.isUniformInducing
injective _ _ H := funext fun _ ↦ hf.injective (congrFun H _)
/-- If `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒰(α, γ, u₁)`. -/
protected theorem comap_eq {f : γ → β} :
𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := by
letI : UniformSpace γ := .comap f ‹_›
exact (UniformFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing (f := f) ⟨rfl⟩).comap_uniformSpace.symm
/-- Post-composition by a uniformly continuous function is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniformly continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)`
is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformContinuous [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) :
UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformFun.comap_eq`
refine uniformContinuous_iff.mpr ?_
exact (UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)).trans_eq UniformFun.comap_eq
-- Porting note: the original calc proof below gives a deterministic timeout
--calc
-- 𝒰(α, γ, _) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) :=
-- UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)
-- _ = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := @UniformFun.comap_eq α β γ _ f
/-- Turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism `(α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by
post-composing. -/
protected def congrRight [UniformSpace γ] (e : γ ≃ᵤ β) : (α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) :=
{ Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => e.toEquiv with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.symm.uniformContinuous }
/-- Pre-composition by any function is uniformly continuous for the uniform structures of
uniform convergence.
More precisely, for any `f : γ → α`, the function `(· ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ β) → (γ →ᵤ β)` is uniformly
continuous. -/
protected theorem precomp_uniformContinuous {f : γ → α} :
UniformContinuous fun g : α →ᵤ β => ofFun (toFun g ∘ f) := by
-- Here we simply go back to filter bases.
rw [UniformContinuous,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity γ β)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv x => huv (f x)⟩
/-- Turn a bijection `γ ≃ α` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by pre-composing. -/
protected def congrLeft (e : γ ≃ α) : (γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toEquiv := e.arrowCongr (.refl _)
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
/-- The natural map `UniformFun.toFun` from `α →ᵤ β` to `α → β` is uniformly continuous.
In other words, the uniform structure of uniform convergence is finer than that of pointwise
convergence, aka the product uniform structure. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_toFun : UniformContinuous (toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → α → β) := by
-- By definition of the product uniform structure, this is just `uniform_continuous_eval`.
rw [uniformContinuous_pi]
intro x
exact uniformContinuous_eval β x
/-- The topology of uniform convergence is T₂. -/
instance [T2Space β] : T2Space (α →ᵤ β) :=
.of_injective_continuous toFun.injective UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun.continuous
/-- The topology of uniform convergence indeed gives the same notion of convergence as
`TendstoUniformly`. -/
protected theorem tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly {F : ι → α →ᵤ β} {f : α →ᵤ β} :
Tendsto F p (𝓝 f) ↔ TendstoUniformly (toFun ∘ F) (toFun f) p := by
rw [(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds α β f).tendsto_right_iff, TendstoUniformly]
simp only [mem_setOf, UniformFun.gen, Function.comp_def]
/-- The natural bijection between `α → β × γ` and `(α → β) × (α → γ)`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ β × γ` and `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ)`. -/
protected def uniformEquivProdArrow [UniformSpace γ] : (α →ᵤ β × γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (𝒰(α, β, uβ) × 𝒰(α, γ, uγ)) = 𝒰(α, β × γ, uβ × uγ)`.
-- But `uβ × uγ` is defined as `comap fst uβ ⊓ comap snd uγ`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.inf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
Equiv.toUniformEquivOfIsUniformInducing (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) <| by
constructor
change
comap (Prod.map (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _))
_ = _
simp_rw [UniformFun]
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold instUniformSpaceProd
rw [UniformSpace.comap_inf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap]
have := (@UniformFun.inf_eq α (β × γ)
(UniformSpace.comap Prod.fst ‹_›) (UniformSpace.comap Prod.snd ‹_›)).symm
rwa [UniformFun.comap_eq, UniformFun.comap_eq] at this
-- the relevant diagram commutes by definition
variable (α) (δ : ι → Type*) [∀ i, UniformSpace (δ i)]
/-- The natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i` and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ (Π i, δ i)` and `Π i, α →ᵤ δ i`. -/
protected def uniformEquivPiComm : UniformEquiv (α →ᵤ ∀ i, δ i) (∀ i, α →ᵤ δ i) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (Π i, 𝒰(α, δ i, uδ i)) = 𝒰(α, (Π i, δ i), (Π i, uδ i))`.
-- But `Π i, uδ i` is defined as `⨅ i, comap (eval i) (uδ i)`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.iInf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
@Equiv.toUniformEquivOfIsUniformInducing
_ _ 𝒰(α, ∀ i, δ i, Pi.uniformSpace δ)
(@Pi.uniformSpace ι (fun i => α → δ i) fun i => 𝒰(α, δ i, _)) (Equiv.piComm _) <| by
refine @IsUniformInducing.mk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
change comap (Prod.map Function.swap Function.swap) _ = _
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold Pi.uniformSpace
rw [UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore, UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore,
UniformSpace.comap_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
rw [← UniformSpace.comap_comap, UniformFun.comap_eq]
rfl
-- Like in the previous lemma, the diagram actually commutes by definition
/-- The set of continuous functions is closed in the uniform convergence topology.
This is a simple wrapper over `TendstoUniformly.continuous`. -/
theorem isClosed_setOf_continuous [TopologicalSpace α] :
IsClosed {f : α →ᵤ β | Continuous (toFun f)} := by
refine isClosed_iff_forall_filter.2 fun f u _ hu huf ↦ ?_
rw [← tendsto_id', UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly] at huf
exact huf.continuous (le_principal_iff.mp hu)
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_inf_precomp_of_cover {δ₁ δ₂ : Type*} (φ₁ : δ₁ → α) (φ₂ : δ₂ → α)
(h_cover : range φ₁ ∪ range φ₂ = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) =
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₁) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₁, β, _) ⊓
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₂) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₂, β, _) := by
ext : 1
refine le_antisymm (le_inf ?_ ?_) ?_
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· refine
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₁ β |>.comap _).inf
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₂ β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨U, U⟩, ⟨hU, hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases h_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with (⟨y, rfl⟩|⟨y, rfl⟩)
· exact hfg.1 y
· exact hfg.2 y
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_iInf_precomp_of_cover {δ : ι → Type*} (φ : Π i, δ i → α)
(h_cover : ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ⋃ i ∈ I, range (φ i) = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) = ⨅ i, .comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ i) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ i, β, _) := by
ext : 1
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap]
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous) ?_
rcases h_cover with ⟨I, I_finite, I_cover⟩
refine Filter.hasBasis_iInf (fun i : ι ↦ UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity (δ i) β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨I, fun _ ↦ U⟩, ⟨I_finite, fun _ ↦ hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp <| I_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with ⟨i, hi, y, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInter.mp hfg ⟨i, hi⟩ y
end UniformFun
namespace UniformOnFun
variable {α β : Type*} {γ ι : Type*}
variable {s : Set α} {p : Filter ι}
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of `𝔖`-convergence: for `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`,
`gen 𝔖 S V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)` of functions `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` such that
`∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. Note that the family `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is only used to specify which
type alias of `α → β` to use here. -/
protected def gen (𝔖) (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) | ∀ x ∈ S, (toFun 𝔖 uv.1 x, toFun 𝔖 uv.2 x) ∈ V }
/-- For `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`, we have
`UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V = (S.restrict × S.restrict) ⁻¹' (UniformFun.gen S β V)`.
This is the crucial fact for proving that the family `UniformOnFun.gen S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓤 β` is indeed a basis for the uniformity `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` endowed with `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`
the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, as defined in `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`. -/
protected theorem gen_eq_preimage_restrict {𝔖} (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V =
Prod.map (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) ⁻¹'
UniformFun.gen S β V := by
ext uv
exact ⟨fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ => h x hx, fun h x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
/-- `UniformOnFun.gen` is antitone in the first argument and monotone in the second. -/
protected theorem gen_mono {𝔖} {S S' : Set α} {V V' : Set (β × β)} (hS : S' ⊆ S) (hV : V ⊆ V') :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V ⊆ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S' V' := fun _uv h x hx => hV (h x <| hS hx)
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis on `β × β`, then the
family `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` is a filter basis on
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)`.
We will show in `has_basis_uniformity_of_basis` that, if `𝓑` is a basis for `𝓤 β`, then the
corresponding filter is the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝔖 : Set (Set α)) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
(𝓑 : FilterBasis <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓑) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
⟨h.prod 𝓑.nonempty, fun {U₁V₁ U₂V₂} h₁ h₂ =>
let ⟨U₃, hU₃, hU₁₃, hU₂₃⟩ := h' U₁V₁.1 h₁.1 U₂V₂.1 h₂.1
let ⟨V₃, hV₃, hV₁₂₃⟩ := 𝓑.inter_sets h₁.2 h₂.2
⟨⟨U₃, V₃⟩,
⟨⟨hU₃, hV₃⟩, fun _ H =>
⟨fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₁₃ hx).1, fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₂₃ hx).2⟩⟩⟩⟩
variable (α β) [UniformSpace β] (𝔖 : Set (Set α))
/-- Uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`,
declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. It is defined as the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback
by `S.restrict`, the map of restriction to `S`, of the uniform structure `𝒰(s, β, uβ)` on
`↥S →ᵤ β`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform structure on `β`. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖),
.comap (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ UniformOnFun.toFun 𝔖) 𝒰(s, β, _)
local notation "𝒱(" α ", " β ", " 𝔖 ", " u ")" => @UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β u 𝔖
/-- Topology of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`, declared as an
instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, _).toTopologicalSpace
/-- The topology of `𝔖`-convergence is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of topology induced by the map
of `S.restrict : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (↥S →ᵤ β)` of restriction to `S`, where `↥S →ᵤ β` is endowed with
the topology of uniform convergence. -/
protected theorem topologicalSpace_eq :
UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace α β 𝔖 =
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖), TopologicalSpace.induced
(UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ toFun 𝔖) (UniformFun.topologicalSpace s β) := by
simp only [UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
rfl
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) (S : Set α) :
(@uniformity (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ((UniformFun.uniformSpace S β).comap S.restrict)).HasBasis p fun i =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S (s i) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.gen_eq_preimage_restrict, uniformity_comap]
exact (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis S β hb).comap _
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ (h : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
DirectedOn
((fun s : Set α => (UniformFun.uniformSpace s β).comap (s.restrict : (α →ᵤ β) → s →ᵤ β)) ⁻¹'o
GE.ge)
𝔖 :=
h.mono fun _ _ hst =>
((UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _).le_basis_iff
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _)).mpr
fun V hV => ⟨V, hV, UniformOnFun.gen_mono hst subset_rfl⟩
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis of `𝓤 β`, then the
uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) := by
simp only [iInf_uniformity]
exact
hasBasis_biInf_of_directed h (fun S => UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S ∘ s) _
(fun S _hS => UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb S)
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ α β 𝔖 h' hb)
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, then the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the
family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' (𝓤 β).basis_sets
variable {α β}
/-- Let `t i` be a nonempty directed subfamily of `𝔖`
such that every `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t i`.
Let `V` bounded by `p` be a basis of entourages of `β`.
Then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i) (V j)` bounded by `p j` is a basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis {ι ι' : Type*} [Nonempty ι]
{t : ι → Set α} {p : ι' → Prop} {V : ι' → Set (β × β)} (ht : ∀ i, t i ∈ 𝔖)
(hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ i, s ⊆ t i) (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun i : ι × ι' ↦ p i.2) fun i ↦
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i.1) (V i.2) := by
have hne : 𝔖.Nonempty := (range_nonempty t).mono (range_subset_iff.2 ht)
have hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖 := fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ ↦ by
rcases hex s₁ hs₁, hex s₂ hs₂ with ⟨⟨i₁, his₁⟩, i₂, his₂⟩
rcases hdir i₁ i₂ with ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂⟩
exact ⟨t i, ht _, his₁.trans hi₁, his₂.trans hi₂⟩
refine (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 hne hd hb).to_hasBasis
(fun ⟨s, i'⟩ ⟨hs, hi'⟩ ↦ ?_) fun ⟨i, i'⟩ hi' ↦ ⟨(t i, i'), ⟨ht i, hi'⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
rcases hex s hs with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨(i, i'), hi', UniformOnFun.gen_mono hi Subset.rfl⟩
/-- If `t n` is a monotone sequence of sets in `𝔖`
such that each `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t n`
and `V n` is an antitone basis of entourages of `β`,
then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n)` is an antitone basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{t : ι → Set α} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n)
(hb : HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 β) V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasAntitoneBasis fun n ↦ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n) := by
have := hb.nonempty
refine ⟨(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis 𝔖
ht hmono.directed_le hex hb.1).to_hasBasis ?_ fun i _ ↦ ⟨(i, i), trivial, Subset.rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨k, l⟩ -
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) k l with ⟨n, hkn, hln⟩
exact ⟨n, trivial, UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono hkn) (hb.2 <| hln)⟩
· exact fun k l h ↦ UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono h) (hb.2 h)
protected theorem isCountablyGenerated_uniformity [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] {t : ℕ → Set α}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n) :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
let ⟨_V, hV⟩ := exists_antitone_basis (𝓤 β)
(UniformOnFun.hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity 𝔖 ht hmono hex hV).isCountablyGenerated
variable (α β)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis, for any basis
`𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty)
(h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) } :=
letI : UniformSpace (α → β) := UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β 𝔖
nhds_basis_uniformity (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' hb)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 } :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β 𝔖 f h h' (Filter.basis_sets _)
/-- If `S ∈ 𝔖`, then the restriction to `S` is a uniformly continuous map from `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` to
`↥S →ᵤ β`. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_restrict (h : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (s.restrict : (α → β) → s → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
change _ ≤ _
simp only [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, map_le_iff_le_comap, iInf_uniformity]
exact iInf₂_le s h
variable {α}
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the uniformity is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem uniformity_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) :
𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s (V i)) := by
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ h).eq_biInf, comap_iInf, comap_principal,
Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.gen, Subtype.forall, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq,
Prod.map_fst, Prod.map_snd, Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.toFun_ofFun, restrict_apply]
protected theorem uniformity_eq : 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V) :=
UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets
protected theorem gen_mem_uniformity (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V ∈ 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := by
rw [UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the neighbourhoods filter is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem nhds_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V i} := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ h, comap_iInf,
comap_principal, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq]
protected theorem nhds_eq (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} :=
UniformOnFun.nhds_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets f
protected theorem gen_mem_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} ∈ 𝓝 f := by
rw [UniformOnFun.nhds_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
theorem uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun :
UniformContinuous fun f : α →ᵤ β ↦ ofFun 𝔖 (UniformFun.toFun f) := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).eventually_iff]
exact fun _ _ U hU ↦ ⟨U, hU, fun f hf x _ ↦ hf x⟩
/-- The uniformity on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is the same as the uniformity on `α →ᵤ β`,
provided that `Set.univ ∈ 𝔖`.
Here we formulate it as a `UniformEquiv`. -/
def uniformEquivUniformFun (h : univ ∈ 𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toFun f := UniformFun.ofFun <| toFun _ f
invFun f := ofFun _ <| UniformFun.toFun f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
uniformContinuous_toFun := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).tendsto_right_iff]
intro U hU
filter_upwards [UniformOnFun.gen_mem_uniformity _ _ h hU] with f hf x using hf x (mem_univ _)
uniformContinuous_invFun := uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun _ _
/-- Let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and `𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and
`𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono ⦃u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ⦄ (hu : u₁ ≤ u₂) ⦃𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)⦄
(h𝔖 : 𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁) : 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) :=
calc
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₁) := iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h𝔖
_ ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) := iInf₂_mono fun _i _hi => UniformSpace.comap_mono <| UniformFun.mono hu
/-- If `x : α` is in some `S ∈ 𝔖`, then evaluation at `x` is uniformly continuous on
| `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
(UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval β (⟨x, hxs⟩ : s)).comp
(UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_restrict α β 𝔖 hs)
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergenceTopology.lean | 804 | 808 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.String.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Char
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
/-!
# Strings
Supplementary theorems about the `String` type.
-/
namespace String
@[simp] theorem endPos_empty : "".endPos = 0 := rfl
/-- `<` on string iterators. This coincides with `<` on strings as lists. -/
def ltb (s₁ s₂ : Iterator) : Bool :=
if s₂.hasNext then
if s₁.hasNext then
if s₁.curr = s₂.curr then
ltb s₁.next s₂.next
else s₁.curr < s₂.curr
else true
else false
/-- This overrides an instance in core Lean. -/
instance LT' : LT String :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ ↦ ltb s₁.iter s₂.iter⟩
/-- This instance has a prime to avoid the name of the corresponding instance in core Lean. -/
instance decidableLT' : DecidableLT String := by
simp only [DecidableLT, LT']
infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
/-- Induction on `String.ltb`. -/
def ltb.inductionOn.{u} {motive : Iterator → Iterator → Sort u} (it₁ it₂ : Iterator)
(ind : ∀ s₁ s₂ i₁ i₂, Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₂, i₂⟩ → Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ →
get s₁ i₁ = get s₂ i₂ → motive (Iterator.next ⟨s₁, i₁⟩) (Iterator.next ⟨s₂, i₂⟩) →
motive ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ ⟨s₂, i₂⟩)
(eq : ∀ s₁ s₂ i₁ i₂, Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₂, i₂⟩ → Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ →
¬ get s₁ i₁ = get s₂ i₂ → motive ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ ⟨s₂, i₂⟩)
(base₁ : ∀ s₁ s₂ i₁ i₂, Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₂, i₂⟩ → ¬ Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ →
motive ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ ⟨s₂, i₂⟩)
(base₂ : ∀ s₁ s₂ i₁ i₂, ¬ Iterator.hasNext ⟨s₂, i₂⟩ → motive ⟨s₁, i₁⟩ ⟨s₂, i₂⟩) :
motive it₁ it₂ :=
if h₂ : it₂.hasNext then
if h₁ : it₁.hasNext then
if heq : it₁.curr = it₂.curr then
ind it₁.s it₂.s it₁.i it₂.i h₂ h₁ heq (inductionOn it₁.next it₂.next ind eq base₁ base₂)
else eq it₁.s it₂.s it₁.i it₂.i h₂ h₁ heq
else base₁ it₁.s it₂.s it₁.i it₂.i h₂ h₁
else base₂ it₁.s it₂.s it₁.i it₂.i h₂
theorem ltb_cons_addChar (c : Char) (cs₁ cs₂ : List Char) (i₁ i₂ : Pos) :
ltb ⟨⟨c :: cs₁⟩, i₁ + c⟩ ⟨⟨c :: cs₂⟩, i₂ + c⟩ = ltb ⟨⟨cs₁⟩, i₁⟩ ⟨⟨cs₂⟩, i₂⟩ := by
apply ltb.inductionOn ⟨⟨cs₁⟩, i₁⟩ ⟨⟨cs₂⟩, i₂⟩ (motive := fun ⟨⟨cs₁⟩, i₁⟩ ⟨⟨cs₂⟩, i₂⟩ ↦
ltb ⟨⟨c :: cs₁⟩, i₁ + c⟩ ⟨⟨c :: cs₂⟩, i₂ + c⟩ =
ltb ⟨⟨cs₁⟩, i₁⟩ ⟨⟨cs₂⟩, i₂⟩) <;> simp only <;>
intro ⟨cs₁⟩ ⟨cs₂⟩ i₁ i₂ <;>
intros <;>
(conv => lhs; unfold ltb) <;> (conv => rhs; unfold ltb) <;>
simp only [Iterator.hasNext_cons_addChar, ite_false, ite_true, *, reduceCtorEq]
· rename_i h₂ h₁ heq ih
simp only [Iterator.next, next, heq, Iterator.curr, get_cons_addChar, ite_true] at ih ⊢
repeat rw [Pos.addChar_right_comm _ c]
exact ih
· rename_i h₂ h₁ hne
simp [Iterator.curr, get_cons_addChar, hne]
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_toList_lt : ∀ {s₁ s₂ : String}, s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁.toList < s₂.toList
| ⟨s₁⟩, ⟨s₂⟩ => show ltb ⟨⟨s₁⟩, 0⟩ ⟨⟨s₂⟩, 0⟩ ↔ s₁ < s₂ by
induction s₁ generalizing s₂ <;> cases s₂
· unfold ltb; decide
· rename_i c₂ cs₂; apply iff_of_true
· unfold ltb
simp [Iterator.hasNext, Char.utf8Size_pos]
· apply List.nil_lt_cons
· rename_i c₁ cs₁ ih; apply iff_of_false
· unfold ltb
simp [Iterator.hasNext]
· apply not_lt_of_lt; apply List.nil_lt_cons
· rename_i c₁ cs₁ ih c₂ cs₂; unfold ltb
simp only [Iterator.hasNext, Pos.byteIdx_zero, endPos, utf8ByteSize, utf8ByteSize.go,
add_pos_iff, Char.utf8Size_pos, or_true, decide_eq_true_eq, ↓reduceIte, Iterator.curr, get,
utf8GetAux, Iterator.next, next, Bool.ite_eq_true_distrib]
split_ifs with h
· subst c₂
suffices ltb ⟨⟨c₁ :: cs₁⟩, (0 : Pos) + c₁⟩ ⟨⟨c₁ :: cs₂⟩, (0 : Pos) + c₁⟩ =
ltb ⟨⟨cs₁⟩, 0⟩ ⟨⟨cs₂⟩, 0⟩ by rw [this]; exact (ih cs₂).trans List.lex_cons_iff.symm
apply ltb_cons_addChar
· refine ⟨List.Lex.rel, fun e ↦ ?_⟩
cases e <;> rename_i h'
· assumption
· contradiction
instance LE : LE String :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ ↦ ¬s₂ < s₁⟩
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE String := by
simp only [DecidableLE, LE]
infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
@[simp]
theorem le_iff_toList_le {s₁ s₂ : String} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁.toList ≤ s₂.toList :=
(not_congr lt_iff_toList_lt).trans not_lt
theorem toList_inj {s₁ s₂ : String} : s₁.toList = s₂.toList ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨congr_arg mk, congr_arg toList⟩
theorem asString_nil : [].asString = "" :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : "".toList = [] :=
rfl
theorem asString_toList (s : String) : s.toList.asString = s :=
rfl
theorem toList_nonempty : ∀ {s : String}, s ≠ "" → s.toList = s.head :: (s.drop 1).toList
| ⟨s⟩, h => by
cases s with
| nil => simp at h
| cons c cs =>
simp only [toList, data_drop, List.drop_succ_cons, List.drop_zero, List.cons.injEq, and_true]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : "".data.head! = default :=
rfl
instance : LinearOrder String where
le_refl _ := le_iff_toList_le.mpr le_rfl
le_trans a b c := by
simp only [le_iff_toList_le]
apply le_trans
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by
simp only [lt_iff_toList_lt, le_iff_toList_le, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_antisymm a b := by
simp only [le_iff_toList_le, ← toList_inj]
apply le_antisymm
le_total a b := by
simp only [le_iff_toList_le]
apply le_total
toDecidableLE := String.decidableLE
toDecidableEq := inferInstance
toDecidableLT := String.decidableLT'
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b := by
simp only [compare, compareOfLessAndEq, instLT, List.instLT, lt_iff_toList_lt, toList]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [List.lt_iff_lex_lt] at *
end String
open String
namespace List
theorem toList_asString (l : List Char) : l.asString.toList = l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_asString (l : List Char) : l.asString.length = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem asString_inj {l l' : List Char} : l.asString = l'.asString ↔ l = l' :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← toList_asString l, ← toList_asString l', toList_inj, h],
fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem asString_eq {l : List Char} {s : String} : l.asString = s ↔ l = s.toList := by
rw [← asString_toList s, asString_inj, asString_toList s]
end List
@[simp]
theorem String.length_data (s : String) : s.data.length = s.length :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/String/Basic.lean | 202 | 203 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
div_lt_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
div_le_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
div_le_div₀ hc hac hd hbd
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀ hac hbd c0 d0
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀' (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀' hac hbd c0 d0
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
@[bound]
theorem div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_pos_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha hb₀ hb₁
theorem one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [le_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [div_le_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_comm₀ ha hb
theorem one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_comm₀ ha hb
theorem le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_comm₀ ha hb
theorem lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_comm₀ ha hb
@[bound] lemma Bound.one_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : b < a → 1 < a / b := (one_lt_div b0).mpr
@[bound] lemma Bound.div_lt_one_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : a < b → a / b < 1 := (div_lt_one b0).mpr
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using inv_anti₀ ha h
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
theorem le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
theorem lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
theorem one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
theorem one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [le_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
theorem half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
div_pos h zero_lt_two
theorem one_half_pos : (0 : α) < 1 / 2 :=
half_pos zero_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem half_le_self_iff : a / 2 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rw [div_le_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
@[simp]
theorem half_lt_self_iff : a / 2 < a ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
alias ⟨_, half_le_self⟩ := half_le_self_iff
alias ⟨_, half_lt_self⟩ := half_lt_self_iff
alias div_two_lt_of_pos := half_lt_self
theorem one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 :=
half_lt_self zero_lt_one
theorem two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 :=
(one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
theorem left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_thirds (a : α) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_add_div_same, div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, ← add_one_mul 2 a, two_add_one_eq_three,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ a three_ne_zero]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left ha, inv_pos]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_right (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right (inv_pos.2 hb)]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff₀ hc]
theorem div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
theorem exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a := by
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1 := div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inr zero_lt_one))
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, ?_⟩
rw [← lt_div_iff₀ this, div_div_cancel₀ h.ne']
exact lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| lt_add_one _)
theorem exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b;
⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff₀ hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone_div_right_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hbc ha
lemma strictMono_div_right_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : StrictMono (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_lt_div_of_pos_right hbc ha
theorem Monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 ≤ c) : Monotone fun x => f x / c := (monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).comp hf
theorem StrictMono.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : StrictMono f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 < c) : StrictMono fun x => f x / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedSemiField.toDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered α where
dense a₁ a₂ h :=
⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc
a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 := (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
_ < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_left h _) zero_lt_two
,
calc
(a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_right h _) zero_lt_two
_ = a₂ := add_self_div_two a₂
⟩
theorem min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_min.symm
theorem max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_max.symm
theorem one_div_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => 1 / x) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ x1 _ y1 xy => (one_div_lt_one_div (Set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (Set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
theorem one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_lt_one_div ?_ ?_).2 (pow_lt_pow_right₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
theorem one_div_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
theorem inv_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ hy xy =>
(inv_lt_inv₀ hy hx).2 xy
theorem inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
theorem inv_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_le_mul₀ {α : Type*}
[Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a ≤ b * ε := by
refine ⟨fun h _ hε ↦ h.trans <| le_mul_of_one_le_right hb hε.le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl|hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp_rw [zero_mul] at h
exact h 2 one_lt_two
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun x hbx => ?_
convert h (x / b) ((one_lt_div hb).mpr hbx)
rw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hb.ne']
/-! ### Results about `IsGLB` -/
theorem IsGLB.mul_left {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => a * b) '' s) (a * b) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· exact (OrderIso.mulLeft₀ _ ha).isGLB_image'.2 hs
· simp_rw [zero_mul]
rw [hs.nonempty.image_const]
exact isGLB_singleton
theorem IsGLB.mul_right {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => b * a) '' s) (b * a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg -/
theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
simp only [division_def, mul_pos_iff, inv_pos, inv_lt_zero]
theorem div_neg_iff : a / b < 0 ↔ 0 < a ∧ b < 0 ∨ a < 0 ∧ 0 < b := by
simp [division_def, mul_neg_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ b ≤ 0 := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonneg_iff]
theorem div_nonpos_iff : a / b ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ b ≤ 0 ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ b := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonpos_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
div_nonneg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_pos_of_neg_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a / b :=
div_pos_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_neg_of_pos_of_neg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inl ⟨ha, hb⟩
/-! ### Relating one division with another term -/
theorem div_le_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => div_mul_cancel₀ b (ne_of_lt hc) ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h hc.le, fun h =>
calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) := mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc)
_ ≥ b * (1 / c) := mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc).le
_ = b / c := (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm
⟩
theorem div_le_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
rw [mul_comm, div_le_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem le_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a * c := by
rw [← neg_neg c, mul_neg, div_neg, le_neg, div_le_iff₀ (neg_pos.2 hc), neg_mul]
theorem le_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ c * a := by
rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem div_lt_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ a * c < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div_iff_of_neg hc
theorem div_lt_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ c * a < b := by
rw [mul_comm, div_lt_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem lt_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < a * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| div_le_iff_of_neg hc
theorem lt_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < c * a := by
rw [mul_comm, lt_div_iff_of_neg hc]
theorem div_le_one_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [neg_div_neg_eq] using div_le_one_of_le₀ (neg_le_neg h) (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
/-! ### Bi-implications of inequalities using inversions -/
theorem inv_le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [← one_div, div_le_iff_of_neg ha, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem inv_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg hb (inv_lt_zero.2 ha), inv_inv]
theorem le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg (inv_lt_zero.2 hb) ha, inv_inv]
theorem inv_lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
theorem inv_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
theorem lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_of_neg hb ha)
/-!
### Monotonicity results involving inversion
-/
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Ioi c) :=
antitoneOn_iff_forall_lt.mpr fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦
inv_le_inv₀ (sub_pos.mpr hb) (sub_pos.mpr ha) |>.mpr <| sub_le_sub (le_of_lt hab) le_rfl
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Iio c) :=
antitoneOn_iff_forall_lt.mpr fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦
inv_le_inv_of_neg (sub_neg.mpr hb) (sub_neg.mpr ha) |>.mpr <| sub_le_sub (le_of_lt hab) le_rfl
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right (ha : c < a) :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· exact sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi.mono <| (Set.Icc_subset_Ioi_iff hab).mpr ha
· simp [hab, Set.Subsingleton.antitoneOn]
theorem sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left (ha : b < c) :
AntitoneOn (fun x ↦ (x-c)⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· exact sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio.mono <| (Set.Icc_subset_Iio_iff hab).mpr ha
· simp [hab, Set.Subsingleton.antitoneOn]
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Ioi :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Ioi (α := α)
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Iio :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Iio 0) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Iio (α := α)
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right (ha : 0 < a) :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_right ha
exact (sub_zero _).symm
theorem inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left (hb : b < 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun x : α ↦ x⁻¹) (Set.Icc a b) := by
convert sub_inv_antitoneOn_Icc_left hb
exact (sub_zero _).symm
/-! ### Relating two divisions -/
theorem div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le (hc : c ≤ 0) (h : b ≤ a) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_nonpos.2 hc)
theorem div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt (hc : c < 0) (h : b < a) : a / c < b / c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc)
theorem div_le_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt <| div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt hc, div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le <| hc.le⟩
theorem div_lt_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c < b / c ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| div_le_div_right_of_neg hc
/-! ### Relating one division and involving `1` -/
theorem one_le_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 < a / b ↔ a < b := by rw [lt_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 1 ↔ b < a := by rw [div_lt_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_of_neg ha hb
theorem one_div_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_of_neg ha hb
theorem le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_of_neg ha hb
theorem lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_of_neg ha hb
theorem one_lt_div_iff : 1 < a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b < a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a < b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div_of_neg]
· simp [lt_irrefl, zero_le_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div]
theorem one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b ≤ a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a ≤ b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div_of_neg]
· simp [lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one.not_le, zero_lt_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div]
theorem div_lt_one_iff : a / b < 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a < b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b < a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_lt_one_of_neg]
· simp [zero_lt_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_lt_one, hb.ne.symm]
theorem div_le_one_iff : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a ≤ b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b ≤ a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb | rfl | hb)
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_le_one_of_neg]
· simp [zero_le_one]
· simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_le_one, hb.ne.symm]
/-! ### Relating two divisions, involving `1` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le (hb : b < 0) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [div_le_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_le_one_of_neg (h.trans_lt hb)]
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt (hb : b < 0) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [div_lt_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one_of_neg (h.trans hb)]
theorem le_of_neg_of_one_div_le_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt hb) h
theorem lt_of_neg_of_one_div_lt_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le hb) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simpa [one_div] using inv_le_inv_of_neg ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
| `lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg hb ha)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 518 | 520 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves]
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff₀ h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
| use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 160 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
/-!
# The sheaf condition for a presieve
We define what it means for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v` to be a sheaf *for* a particular
presieve `R` on `X`:
* A *family of elements* `x` for `P` at `R` is an element `x_f` of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`. See `FamilyOfElements`.
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and `f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` both in `R`,
and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂` such that `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`, the restriction of
`x_f₁` along `g₁` agrees with the restriction of `x_f₂` along `g₂`.
See `FamilyOfElements.Compatible`.
* An *amalgamation* `t` for the family is an element of `P X` such that for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`, the restriction of `t` on `f` is `x_f`.
See `FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation`.
We then say `P` is *separated* for `R` if every compatible family has at most one amalgamation,
and it is a *sheaf* for `R` if every compatible family has a unique amalgamation.
See `IsSeparatedFor` and `IsSheafFor`.
In the special case where `R` is a sieve, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R` and `g : Z ⟶ Y`, the restriction of
`x_f` along `g` agrees with `x_(g ≫ f)` (which is well defined since `g ≫ f` is in `R`).
See `FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible` and `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
In the special case where `C` has pullbacks, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` both in `R`,
the restriction of `x_f` along `π₁ : pullback f g ⟶ Y` agrees with the restriction of `x_g`
along `π₂ : pullback f g ⟶ Z`.
See `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` and `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
We also provide equivalent conditions to satisfy alternate definitions given in the literature.
* Stacks: The condition of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8 is virtually identical to the
statement of `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition` (since the bijection described there carries
the same information as the unique existence.)
* Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92]: Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`, the definitions of `IsSheaf`
are equivalent. There are also alternate definitions given:
- Yoneda condition: Defined in `yonedaSheafCondition` and equivalence in
`isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
- Matching family for presieves with pullback: `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
## Implementation
The sheaf condition is given as a proposition, rather than a subsingleton in `Type (max u₁ v)`.
This doesn't seem to make a big difference, other than making a couple of definitions noncomputable,
but it means that equivalent conditions can be given as `↔` statements rather than `≃` statements,
which can be convenient.
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00ZB (sheaves on a topology)
-/
universe w w' v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf `P` given a collection of arrows `R` with fixed codomain `X`
consists of an element of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R`.
A presheaf is a sheaf (resp, separated) if every *compatible* family of elements has exactly one
(resp, at most one) amalgamation.
This data is referred to as a `family` in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. It is also a concrete
version of the elements of the middle object in the Stacks entry which is
more useful for direct calculations. It is also used implicitly in Definition C2.1.2 in [Elephant].
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is a concrete version of the elements of the middle object there."]
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf on the presieve `R₂` can be restricted to a smaller presieve
`R₁`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
/-- The image of a family of elements by a morphism of presheaves. -/
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
/-- A family of elements for the arrow set `R` is *compatible* if for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and
`f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` in `R`, and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂`, if the square `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`
commutes then the elements of `P Z` obtained by restricting the element of `P Y₁` along `g₁` and
restricting the element of `P Y₂` along `g₂` are the same.
In special cases, this condition can be simplified, see `pullbackCompatible_iff` and
`compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is referred to as a "compatible family" in Definition C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and on nlab:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.Compatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
/--
If the category `C` has pullbacks, this is an alternative condition for a family of elements to be
compatible: For any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` in the presieve `R`, the restriction of the
given elements for `f` and `g` to the pullback agree.
This is equivalent to being compatible (provided `C` has pullbacks), shown in
`pullbackCompatible_iff`.
This is the definition for a "matching" family given in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
Equation (5). Viewing the type `FamilyOfElements` as the middle object of the fork in
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, this condition expresses that `pr₀* (x) = pr₁* (x)`,
using the notation defined there.
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.PullbackCompatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst f₁ f₂).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map (pullback.snd f₁ f₂).op (x f₂ h₂)
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
/-- The restriction of a compatible family is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
/-- Extend a family of elements to the sieve generated by an arrow set.
This is the construction described as "easy" in Lemma C2.1.3 of [Elephant].
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
/-- The extension of a compatible family to the generated sieve is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
/-- The extension of a family agrees with the original family. -/
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
|
/-- The restriction of an extension is the original. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 195 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
|
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 224 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Julian Kuelshammer, Heather Macbeth, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Chebyshev polynomials
The Chebyshev polynomials are families of polynomials indexed by `ℤ`,
with integral coefficients.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.U`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind (also known as the
Vieta–Lucas polynomials), given by $C_n(2x) = 2T_n(x)$.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.S`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind (also known as the
Vieta–Fibonacci polynomials), given by $S_n(2x) = U_n(x)$.
## Main statements
* The formal derivative of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is a scalar multiple of the
Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul_T`, twice the product of the `m`-th and `k`-th Chebyshev polynomials
of the first kind is the sum of the `m + k`-th and `m - k`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first
kind. There is a similar statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul_C` for the `C` polynomials.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul`, the `(m * n)`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is the
composition of the `m`-th and `n`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. There is a similar
statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul` for the `C` polynomials.
## Implementation details
Since Chebyshev polynomials have interesting behaviour over the complex numbers and modulo `p`,
we define them to have coefficients in an arbitrary commutative ring, even though
technically `ℤ` would suffice.
The benefit of allowing arbitrary coefficient rings, is that the statements afterwards are clean,
and do not have `map (Int.castRingHom R)` interfering all the time.
## References
[Lionel Ponton, _Roots of the Chebyshev polynomials: A purely algebraic approach_]
[ponton2020chebyshev]
## TODO
* Redefine and/or relate the definition of Chebyshev polynomials to `LinearRecurrence`.
* Add explicit formula involving square roots for Chebyshev polynomials
* Compute zeroes and extrema of Chebyshev polynomials.
* Prove that the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials (except 0) are irrational.
* Prove minimax properties of Chebyshev polynomials.
-/
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
open Polynomial
variable (R R' : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing R']
/-- `T n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
/-- Induction principle used for proving facts about Chebyshev polynomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_sub_two (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 2) = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem T_sub_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_eq (n : ℤ) : T R n = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem T_zero : T R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem T_one : T R 1 = X := rfl
theorem T_neg_one : T R (-1) = X := show 2 * X * 1 - X = X by ring
theorem T_two : T R 2 = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
simpa [pow_two, mul_assoc] using T_add_two R 0
@[simp]
theorem T_neg (n : ℤ) : T R (-n) = T R n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => rfl
| one => show 2 * X * 1 - X = X; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_two R n
have h₂ := T_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 - h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_one R n
have h₂ := T_sub_one R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ - h₂
theorem T_natAbs (n : ℤ) : T R n.natAbs = T R n := by
obtain h | h := Int.natAbs_eq n <;> nth_rw 2 [h]; simp
theorem T_neg_two : T R (-2) = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by simp [T_two]
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval 1 = 1 := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_add_two, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_sub_one, -T_neg, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_neg_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval (-1) = n.negOnePow := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_add_two, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1,
Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg, ih2,
Int.negOnePow_def 2]
norm_cast
norm_num
ring
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_sub_one, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1, neg_mul,
ih2, Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, sub_neg_eq_add,
Int.negOnePow_sub]
ring
/-- `U n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def U : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => 2 * X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * U (n + 1) - U n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * U (-n) - U (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_add_two : ∀ n, U R (n + 2) = 2 * X * U R (n + 1) - U R n
| (k : ℕ) => U.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) U.eq_4 R k
theorem U_add_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 2) = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem U_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_eq (n : ℤ) : U R n = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem U_zero : U R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_one : U R 1 = 2 * X := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_one : U R (-1) = 0 := by simpa using U_sub_one R 0
theorem U_two : U R 2 = 4 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
have := U_add_two R 0
simp only [zero_add, U_one, U_zero] at this
linear_combination this
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_two : U R (-2) = -1 := by
simpa [zero_sub, Int.reduceNeg, U_neg_one, mul_zero, U_zero] using U_sub_two R 0
theorem U_neg_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 1) = -U R (n - 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_one R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n - 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X : R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_eq R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X : R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
theorem U_neg (n : ℤ) : U R (-n) = -U R (n - 2) := by simpa [sub_sub] using U_neg_sub_one R (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 2) = -U R n := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] using U_neg R (n + 2)
@[simp]
theorem U_eval_one (n : ℤ) : (U R n).eval 1 = n + 1 := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp; norm_num
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [U_add_two, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_one, ih1,
Int.cast_add, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_one, ih2, Int.cast_ofNat]
| ring
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [U_sub_one, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_one,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 233 | 235 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
/-!
# Marginals of multivariate functions
In this file, we define a convenient way to compute integrals of multivariate functions, especially
if you want to write expressions where you integrate only over some of the variables that the
function depends on. This is common in induction arguments involving integrals of multivariate
functions.
This constructions allows working with iterated integrals and applying Tonelli's theorem
and Fubini's theorem, without using measurable equivalences by changing the representation of your
space (e.g. `((ι ⊕ ι') → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) × (ι' → ℝ)`).
## Main Definitions
* Assume that `∀ i : ι, X i` is a product of measurable spaces with measures `μ i` on `X i`,
`f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞` is a function and `s : Finset ι`.
Then `lmarginal μ s f` or `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is the function that integrates `f`
over all variables in `s`. It returns a function that still takes the same variables as `f`,
but is constant in the variables in `s`. Mathematically, if `s = {i₁, ..., iₖ}`,
then `lmarginal μ s f` is the expression
$$
\vec{x}\mapsto \int\!\!\cdots\!\!\int f(\vec{x}[\vec{y}])dy_{i_1}\cdots dy_{i_k}.
$$
where $\vec{x}[\vec{y}]$ is the vector $\vec{x}$ with $x_{i_j}$ replaced by $y_{i_j}$ for all
$1 \le j \le k$.
If `f` is the distribution of a random variable, this is the marginal distribution of all
variables not in `s` (but not the most general notion, since we only consider product measures
here).
Note that the notation `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is not a binder, and returns a function.
## Main Results
* `lmarginal_union` is the analogue of Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals. It states that
for measurable functions `f` and disjoint finsets `s` and `t` we have
`∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ`.
## Implementation notes
The function `f` can have an arbitrary product as its domain (even infinite products), but the
set `s` of integration variables is a `Finset`. We are assuming that the function `f` is measurable
for most of this file. Note that asking whether it is `AEMeasurable` is not even well-posed,
since there is no well-behaved measure on the domain of `f`.
## TODO
* Define the marginal function for functions taking values in a Banach space.
-/
open scoped ENNReal
open Set Function Equiv Finset
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
section LMarginal
variable {δ δ' : Type*} {X : δ → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (X i)]
variable {μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)} [DecidableEq δ]
variable {s t : Finset δ} {f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ∀ i, X i}
/-- Integrate `f(x₁,…,xₙ)` over all variables `xᵢ` where `i ∈ s`. Return a function in the
remaining variables (it will be constant in the `xᵢ` for `i ∈ s`).
This is the marginal distribution of all variables not in `s` when the considered measure
is the product measure. -/
def lmarginal (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) (s : Finset δ) (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(x : ∀ i, X i) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ y : ∀ i : s, X i, f (updateFinset x s y) ∂Measure.pi fun i : s => μ i
-- Note: this notation is not a binder. This is more convenient since it returns a function.
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f " ∂" μ:70 => lmarginal μ s f
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f => lmarginal (fun _ ↦ volume) s f
variable (μ)
theorem _root_.Measurable.lmarginal [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) := by
refine Measurable.lintegral_prod_right ?_
refine hf.comp ?_
rw [measurable_pi_iff]; intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· simpa [hi, updateFinset] using measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_snd _
· simpa [hi, updateFinset] using measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_fst _
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_empty (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⋯∫⁻_∅, f ∂μ = f := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, Measure.pi_of_empty fun i : (∅ : Finset δ) => μ i]
apply lintegral_dirac'
exact Subsingleton.measurable
/-- The marginal distribution is independent of the variables in `s`. -/
theorem lmarginal_congr {x y : ∀ i, X i} (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ i ∉ s, x i = y i) :
| (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) y := by
dsimp [lmarginal, updateFinset_def]; rcongr; exact h _ ‹_›
theorem lmarginal_update_of_mem {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ s)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Marginal.lean | 105 | 108 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`K.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = K.orthogonalProjection u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `K.reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `K.reflection u` to satisfy
`u + (K.reflection u) = 2 • K.orthogonalProjection u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open InnerProductSpace
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Finsupp
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- **Existence of minimizers**, aka the **Hilbert projection theorem**.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`. -/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
exact le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
namespace Submodule
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superseded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply RCLike.ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).2 this
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if every vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
K.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases K.exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← K.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero hwK]
instance [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map f.toLinearIsometry).HasOrthogonalProjection :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E).HasOrthogonalProjection := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u), K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ +
‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ := by
set p := K.orthogonalProjectionFn v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [K.orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq x]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
K.orthogonalProjectionFn v = (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) :=
rfl
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - K.orthogonalProjection v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u : E) = u - K.orthogonalProjection u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (K.orthogonalProjection u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u =
⟨u - K.orthogonalProjection u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (y : E) :
‖y - U.orthogonalProjection y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [U.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K'.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = (K'.orthogonalProjection u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : K.orthogonalProjection v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker K.orthogonalProjection = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection]
(x : E) : f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f.toLinearMap).orthogonalProjection (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f).HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f).orthogonalProjection (f x) :=
have : (p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
((p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).orthogonalProjection x : E') =
f (p.orthogonalProjection (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonalProjection = 0 := by ext
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖K.orthogonalProjection‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • ((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -map_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp K.orthogonalProjection.toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ K.reflectionLinearEquiv with
norm_map' := by
intro x
let w : K := K.orthogonalProjection x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : K.reflection p = 2 • (K.orthogonalProjection p : E) - p :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : K.reflection.symm = K.reflection :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : K.reflection⁻¹ = K.reflection :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : K.reflection (K.reflection p) = p :=
K.reflection.left_inv p
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive K.reflection :=
K.reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
K.reflection.trans K.reflection = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : K.reflection * K.reflection = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -K.reflection v := by
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
theorem reflection_orthogonal : Kᗮ.reflection = .trans K.reflection (.neg _) := by
ext; apply reflection_orthogonal_apply
variable {K}
theorem reflection_singleton_apply (u v : E) :
reflection (𝕜 ∙ u) v = 2 • (⟪u, v⟫ / ((‖u‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2)) • u - v := by
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_singleton, ofReal_pow]
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the subspace. -/
theorem reflection_eq_self_iff (x : E) : K.reflection x = x ↔ x ∈ K := by
rw [← orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← two_smul 𝕜,
two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul 𝕜]
refine (smul_right_injective E ?_).eq_iff
exact two_ne_zero
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self {x : E} (hx : x ∈ K) : K.reflection x = x :=
(reflection_eq_self_iff x).mpr hx
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x = f (K.reflection (f.symm x)) := by
simp [two_smul, reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_map_apply f K x]
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) = f.symm.trans (K.reflection.trans f) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_map_apply f K
/-- Reflection through the trivial subspace {0} is just negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_bot : reflection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg 𝕜 := by
ext; simp [reflection_apply]
end reflection
end Submodule
section Orthogonal
namespace Submodule
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
[K₁.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K₁ ⊔ K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ = K₂ := by
ext x
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
let v : K₁ := orthogonalProjection K₁ x
have hvm : x - v ∈ K₁ᗮ := sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2
· exact fun hx => ⟨v, v.prop, x - v, ⟨hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h v.prop)⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable {K} in
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := by
convert Submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) using 2
simp
/-- If `K` is complete, any `v` in `E` can be expressed as a sum of elements of `K` and `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (v : E) :
∃ y ∈ K, ∃ z ∈ Kᗮ, v = y + z :=
⟨K.orthogonalProjection v, Subtype.coe_prop _, v - K.orthogonalProjection v,
sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _, by simp⟩
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, then the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal
complement is itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮᗮ = K := by
ext v
constructor
· obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := K.exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal v
intro hv
have hz' : z = 0 := by
have hyz : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by simp [hz y hy, inner_eq_zero_symm]
simpa [inner_add_right, hyz] using hv z hz
simp [hy, hz']
· intro hv w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact hw v hv
/-- In a Hilbert space, the orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement of a subspace `K`
is the topological closure of `K`.
Note that the completeness assumption is necessary. Let `E` be the space `ℕ →₀ ℝ` with inner space
structure inherited from `PiLp 2 (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℝ)`. Let `K` be the subspace of sequences with the sum
of all elements equal to zero. Then `Kᗮ = ⊥`, `Kᗮᗮ = ⊤`. -/
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure [CompleteSpace E] :
Kᗮᗮ = K.topologicalClosure := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· convert Submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone K.le_topologicalClosure using 1
rw [K.topologicalClosure.orthogonal_orthogonal]
· exact K.topologicalClosure_minimal K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal Kᗮ.isClosed_orthogonal
variable {K}
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, `K` and `Kᗮ` are complements of each other. -/
theorem isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : IsCompl K Kᗮ :=
⟨K.orthogonal_disjoint, codisjoint_iff.2 Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace⟩
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalComplement_eq_orthogonalComplement {L : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
[L.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ = Lᗮ ↔ K = L :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using congr(Submodule.orthogonal $(h)),
fun h ↦ congr(Submodule.orthogonal $(h))⟩
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_eq_bot_iff [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ = ⊥ ↔ K = ⊤ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => by rw [h, Submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot]⟩
intro h
have : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
rwa [h, sup_comm, bot_sup_eq] at this
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `K` of an element of `Kᗮ` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{v : E} (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 := by
ext
convert eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal (K := K) _ _ <;> simp [hv]
/-- The projection into `U` from an orthogonal submodule `V` is the zero map. -/
theorem IsOrtho.orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (h : U ⟂ V) : U.orthogonalProjection ∘L V.subtypeL = 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext fun v =>
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero <| h.symm v.prop
/-- The projection into `U` from `V` is the zero map if and only if `U` and `V` are orthogonal. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL_eq_zero_iff {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] : U.orthogonalProjection ∘L V.subtypeL = 0 ↔ U ⟂ V :=
⟨fun h u hu v hv => by
convert orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero v u hu using 2
have : U.orthogonalProjection v = 0 := DFunLike.congr_fun h (⟨_, hv⟩ : V)
rw [this, Submodule.coe_zero, sub_zero], Submodule.IsOrtho.orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL⟩
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_linear_proj [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
K.orthogonalProjection x =
K.linearProjOfIsCompl _ Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace x := by
have : IsCompl K Kᗮ := Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
conv_lhs => rw [← Submodule.linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self this x]
rw [map_add, orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self,
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _), add_zero]
theorem orthogonalProjection_coe_linearMap_eq_linearProj [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
(K.orthogonalProjection : E →ₗ[𝕜] K) =
K.linearProjOfIsCompl _ Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace :=
LinearMap.ext <| orthogonalProjection_eq_linear_proj
/-- The reflection in `K` of an element of `Kᗮ` is its negation. -/
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : K.reflection v = -v := by
simp [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero hv]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `Kᗮ` of an element of `K` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
[Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) : Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection v = 0 :=
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero (K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hv)
/-- If `U ≤ V`, then projecting on `V` and then on `U` is the same as projecting on `U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonalProjection_of_le {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] [V.HasOrthogonalProjection] (h : U ≤ V) (x : E) :
U.orthogonalProjection (V.orthogonalProjection x) = U.orthogonalProjection x :=
Eq.symm <| by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, map_sub] using
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero
(Submodule.orthogonal_le h (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x))
/-- Given a monotone family `U` of complete submodules of `E` and a fixed `x : E`,
the orthogonal projection of `x` on `U i` tends to the orthogonal projection of `x` on
`(⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure` along `atTop`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_tendsto_closure_iSup {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
(U : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E) [∀ i, (U i).HasOrthogonalProjection]
[(⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.HasOrthogonalProjection] (hU : Monotone U) (x : E) :
Filter.Tendsto (fun i => ((U i).orthogonalProjection x : E)) atTop
(𝓝 ((⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.orthogonalProjection x : E)) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp h
let y := ((⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.orthogonalProjection x : E)
have proj_x : ∀ i, (U i).orthogonalProjection x = (U i).orthogonalProjection y := fun i =>
(orthogonalProjection_orthogonalProjection_of_le
((le_iSup U i).trans (iSup U).le_topologicalClosure) _).symm
suffices ∀ ε > 0, ∃ I, ∀ i ≥ I, ‖((U i).orthogonalProjection y : E) - y‖ < ε by
simpa only [proj_x, NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_atTop] using this
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ : ∃ a ∈ ⨆ i, U i, dist y a < ε := by
have y_mem : y ∈ (⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure := Submodule.coe_mem _
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe, Metric.mem_closure_iff] at y_mem
exact y_mem ε hε
rw [dist_eq_norm] at hay
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ : ∃ I, a ∈ U I := by rwa [Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed _ hU.directed_le] at ha
refine ⟨I, fun i (hi : I ≤ i) => ?_⟩
rw [norm_sub_rev, orthogonalProjection_minimal]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hay
change _ ≤ ‖y - (⟨a, hU hi hI⟩ : U i)‖
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.mpr fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩ _
/-- Given a monotone family `U` of complete submodules of `E` with dense span supremum,
and a fixed `x : E`, the orthogonal projection of `x` on `U i` tends to `x` along `at_top`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_tendsto_self {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
(U : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E) [∀ t, (U t).HasOrthogonalProjection] (hU : Monotone U) (x : E)
(hU' : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ t, U t).topologicalClosure) :
Filter.Tendsto (fun t => ((U t).orthogonalProjection x : E)) atTop (𝓝 x) := by
have : (⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.HasOrthogonalProjection := by
rw [top_unique hU']
infer_instance
convert orthogonalProjection_tendsto_closure_iSup U hU x
rw [eq_comm, orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, top_unique hU']
trivial
/-- The orthogonal complement satisfies `Kᗮᗮᗮ = Kᗮ`. -/
theorem triorthogonal_eq_orthogonal [CompleteSpace E] : Kᗮᗮᗮ = Kᗮ := by
rw [Kᗮ.orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure]
exact K.isClosed_orthogonal.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq
/-- The closure of `K` is the full space iff `Kᗮ` is trivial. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_eq_top_iff [CompleteSpace E] :
K.topologicalClosure = ⊤ ↔ Kᗮ = ⊥ := by
rw [← K.orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← Submodule.triorthogonal_eq_orthogonal, h, Submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot]
· rw [h, Submodule.bot_orthogonal_eq_top]
end Submodule
namespace Dense
/- TODO: Move to another file? -/
open Submodule
variable {K} {x y : E}
theorem eq_zero_of_inner_left (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪x, v⟫ = 0) : x = 0 := by
have : (⟪x, ·⟫) = 0 := (continuous_const.inner continuous_id).ext_on
hK continuous_const (Subtype.forall.1 h)
simpa using congr_fun this x
theorem eq_zero_of_mem_orthogonal (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : x ∈ Kᗮ) : x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_inner_left hK fun v ↦ (mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 h _ v.2
/-- If `S` is dense and `x - y ∈ Kᗮ`, then `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : x - y ∈ Kᗮ) : x = y :=
sub_eq_zero.1 <| eq_zero_of_mem_orthogonal hK h
theorem eq_of_inner_left (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y :=
hK.eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (Submodule.sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_left h)
theorem eq_of_inner_right (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪(v : E), x⟫ = ⟪(v : E), y⟫) :
x = y :=
hK.eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (Submodule.sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_right h)
theorem eq_zero_of_inner_right (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪(v : E), x⟫ = 0) : x = 0 :=
hK.eq_of_inner_right fun v => by rw [inner_zero_right, h v]
end Dense
namespace Submodule
variable {K}
/-- The reflection in `Kᗮ` of an element of `K` is its negation. -/
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_neg [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -v :=
reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg (K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hv)
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ` of `v` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_zero (v : E) :
(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ.orthogonalProjection v = 0 :=
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
(Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self v)
/-- The reflection in `(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ` of `v` is `-v`. -/
theorem reflection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_neg (v : E) : reflection (𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ v = -v :=
reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_neg (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self v)
theorem reflection_sub {v w : F} (h : ‖v‖ = ‖w‖) : reflection (ℝ ∙ (v - w))ᗮ v = w := by
set R : F ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F := reflection (ℝ ∙ v - w)ᗮ
suffices R v + R v = w + w by
apply smul_right_injective F (by norm_num : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)
simpa [two_smul] using this
have h₁ : R (v - w) = -(v - w) := reflection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_neg (v - w)
have h₂ : R (v + w) = v + w := by
apply reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self
rw [Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
rw [real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff]
exact h
convert congr_arg₂ (· + ·) h₂ h₁ using 1
· simp
· abel
variable (K)
section FiniteDimensional
open Module
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 K]
@[simp]
theorem det_reflection : LinearMap.det K.reflection.toLinearMap = (-1) ^ finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ := by
by_cases hK : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 Kᗮ
swap
· rw [finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hK, pow_zero, LinearMap.det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero]
exact finrank_of_infinite_dimensional fun h ↦ hK (h.finiteDimensional_submodule _)
let e := K.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ K.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
let b := (finBasis 𝕜 K).prod (finBasis 𝕜 Kᗮ)
have : LinearMap.toMatrix b b (e.symm ∘ₗ K.reflection.toLinearMap ∘ₗ e.symm.symm) =
Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (-1) := by
ext (_ | _) (_ | _) <;>
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, b, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, e, eq_comm,
reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self, reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg]
rw [← LinearMap.det_conj _ e.symm, ← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b, this, Matrix.det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
Matrix.det_one, one_mul, Matrix.det_neg, Fintype.card_fin, Matrix.det_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_reflection : K.reflection.det = (-1) ^ finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ := by
ext
rw [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
exact K.det_reflection
end FiniteDimensional
/-- If the orthogonal projection to `K` is well-defined, then a vector splits as the sum of its
orthogonal projections onto a complete submodule `K` and onto the orthogonal complement of `K`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(w : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection w : E) + (Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection w : E) = w := by
simp
/-- The Pythagorean theorem, for an orthogonal projection. -/
theorem norm_sq_eq_add_norm_sq_projection (x : E) (S : Submodule 𝕜 E) [S.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
‖x‖ ^ 2 = ‖S.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 + ‖Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖x‖ ^ 2 = ‖(S.orthogonalProjection x : E) + Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal]
_ = ‖S.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 + ‖Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]
exact norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero _ _ <|
(S.mem_orthogonal _).1 (Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x).2 _ (S.orthogonalProjection x).2
/-- In a complete space `E`, the projection maps onto a complete subspace `K` and its orthogonal
complement sum to the identity. -/
theorem id_eq_sum_orthogonalProjection_self_orthogonalComplement [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E =
K.subtypeL.comp K.orthogonalProjection + Kᗮ.subtypeL.comp Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection := by
ext w
exact (K.orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal w).symm
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `Submodule.coe_inner`.
@[simp high]
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u : K) (v : E) :
⟪K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ = ⟪v, u⟫ :=
calc
⟪K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ = ⟪(K.orthogonalProjection v : E), u⟫ := K.coe_inner _ _
_ = ⟪(K.orthogonalProjection v : E), u⟫ + ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ := by
rw [orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ (Submodule.coe_mem _), add_zero]
_ = ⟪v, u⟫ := by rw [← inner_add_left, add_sub_cancel]
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `Submodule.coe_inner`.
@[simp high]
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_left [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u : K) (v : E) :
⟪u, K.orthogonalProjection v⟫ = ⟪(u : E), v⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, ← inner_conj_symm (u : E), inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right]
/-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u v : E) :
⟪↑(K.orthogonalProjection u), v⟫ = ⟪u, K.orthogonalProjection v⟫ := by
rw [← inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_left, inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right]
/-- The orthogonal projection is symmetric. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
(K.subtypeL ∘L K.orthogonalProjection : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right K
open Module
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `K₂`, and a subspace `K₁`
contained in it, the dimensions of `K₁` and the intersection of its
orthogonal subspace with `K₂` add to that of `K₂`. -/
theorem finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[FiniteDimensional 𝕜 K₂] (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) :
finrank 𝕜 K₁ + finrank 𝕜 (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = finrank 𝕜 K₂ := by
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 K₁ := Submodule.finiteDimensional_of_le h
haveI := FiniteDimensional.proper_rclike 𝕜 K₁
have hd := Submodule.finrank_sup_add_finrank_inf_eq K₁ (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂)
rw [← inf_assoc, (Submodule.orthogonal_disjoint K₁).eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, finrank_bot,
Submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace h] at hd
rw [add_zero] at hd
exact hd.symm
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `K₂`, and a subspace `K₁`
contained in it, the dimensions of `K₁` and the intersection of its
orthogonal subspace with `K₂` add to that of `K₂`. -/
theorem finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal' {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[FiniteDimensional 𝕜 K₂] (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) {n : ℕ} (h_dim : finrank 𝕜 K₁ + n = finrank 𝕜 K₂) :
finrank 𝕜 (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = n := by
rw [← add_right_inj (finrank 𝕜 K₁)]
| simp [Submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal h, h_dim]
/-- Given a finite-dimensional space `E` and subspace `K`, the dimensions of `K` and `Kᗮ` add to
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 1,091 | 1,093 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp [Pi.single_apply]
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts Module
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
theorem isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
namespace Measure
/-!
### Strict subspaces have zero measure
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. This auxiliary lemma proves this assuming additionally that the set is bounded. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
/-- A strict vector subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti₀ cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ H, one_smul]
exact hx this
/-- A strict affine subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
/-!
### Applying a linear map rescales Haar measure by the determinant
We first prove this on `ι → ℝ`, using that this is already known for the product Lebesgue
measure (thanks to matrices computations). Then, we extend this to any finite-dimensional real
vector space by using a linear equiv with a space of the form `ι → ℝ`, and arguing that such a
linear equiv maps Haar measure to Haar measure.
-/
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
/- We have already proved the result for the Lebesgue product measure, using matrices.
We deduce it for any Haar measure by uniqueness (up to scalar multiplication). -/
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearMap {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map f μ s :=
((f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply
s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s := by
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]; rfl
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap {f : E →L[ℝ] E}
(hf : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E))⁻¹) * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ hf s
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s := by
have A : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0 := (LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' f).ne_zero
convert addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ A s
simp only [LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det f| * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq (LinearMap.det f) 0 with (hf | hf)
· let g := (f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
change μ (g '' s) = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.image_eq_preimage g s, addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv]
congr
· simp only [hf, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero]
have : μ (LinearMap.range f) = 0 :=
addHaar_submodule μ _ (LinearMap.range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero hf).ne
exact le_antisymm (le_trans (measure_mono (image_subset_range _ _)) this.le) (zero_le _)
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_image_linearMap μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
μ.addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) s
theorem LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ := by
refine ⟨f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable, ?_⟩
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (hf : f.det ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ :=
LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving μ (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) hf
/-!
### Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
theorem map_addHaar_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (r • ·) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) • μ := by
let f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E := r • (1 : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)
change Measure.map f μ = _
have hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [f, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, Ne, MonoidHom.map_one]
intro h
exact hr (pow_eq_zero h)
simp only [f, map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, map_one]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (r • ·) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_const_smul r, ?_⟩
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s :=
calc
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (r • ·) μ s :=
((Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hr).unit).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s := by
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
/-- Rescaling a set by a factor `r` multiplies its measure by `abs (r ^ dim)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_smul (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq r 0 with (h | rfl)
· rw [← preimage_smul_inv₀ h, addHaar_preimage_smul μ (inv_ne_zero h), inv_pow, inv_inv]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [measure_empty, mul_zero, smul_set_empty]
rw [zero_smul_set hs, ← singleton_zero]
by_cases h : finrank ℝ E = 0
· haveI : Subsingleton E := finrank_zero_iff.1 h
simp only [h, one_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_one, abs_one, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty hs,
pow_zero, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (singleton_nonempty (0 : E))]
· haveI : Nontrivial E := nontrivial_of_finrank_pos (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h)
simp only [h, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero, Ne, not_false_iff,
zero_pow, measure_singleton]
theorem addHaar_smul_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ s := by
rw [addHaar_smul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg hr]
variable {μ} {s : Set E}
-- Note: We might want to rename this once we acquire the lemma corresponding to
-- `MeasurableSet.const_smul`
theorem NullMeasurableSet.const_smul (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (r : ℝ) :
NullMeasurableSet (r • s) μ := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· simpa [zero_smul_set hs'] using nullMeasurableSet_singleton _
obtain ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := hs
refine ⟨_, ht.const_smul_of_ne_zero hr, ?_⟩
rw [← measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff] at hst ⊢
rw [← smul_set_symmDiff₀ hr, addHaar_smul μ, hst, mul_zero]
variable (μ)
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_homothety (x : E) (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s :=
calc
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = μ ((fun y => y + x) '' (r • (fun y => y + -x) '' s)) := by
simp only [← image_smul, image_image, ← sub_eq_add_neg]; rfl
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
simp only [image_add_right, measure_preimage_add_right, addHaar_smul]
/-! We don't need to state `map_addHaar_neg` here, because it has already been proved for
general Haar measures on general commutative groups. -/
/-! ### Measure of balls -/
theorem addHaar_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
(μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : μ (ball x r) = μ (ball (0 : E) r) := by
have : ball (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' ball x r := by simp [preimage_add_ball]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (ball x r) = μ.real (ball (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_ball_center]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x r) = μ (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r := by simp [preimage_add_closedBall]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = μ.real (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall_center]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
have : ball (0 : E) (r * s) = r • ball (0 : E) s := by
simp only [_root_.smul_ball hr.ne' (0 : E) s, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, smul_zero]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, addHaar_ball_center, abs_pow]
theorem addHaar_ball_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
μ (ball x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x hr, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
rcases hr.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
· simp only [zero_pow (finrank_pos (R := ℝ) (M := E)).ne', measure_empty, zero_mul,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ball_zero]
· exact addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x h s
theorem addHaar_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (ball x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_ball_mul μ x hr, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_mul_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 s) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) (r * s) = r • closedBall (0 : E) s := by
simp [smul_closedBall' hr.ne' (0 : E), abs_of_nonneg hr.le]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, addHaar_closedBall_center, abs_pow]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_mul (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) :
μ (closedBall x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 s) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) (r * s) = r • closedBall (0 : E) s := by
simp [smul_closedBall r (0 : E) hs, abs_of_nonneg hr]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr, addHaar_closedBall_center, abs_pow]
/-- The measure of a closed ball can be expressed in terms of the measure of the closed unit ball.
Use instead `addHaar_closedBall`, which uses the measure of the open unit ball as a standard
form. -/
theorem addHaar_closedBall' (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (closedBall x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_closedBall_mul μ x hr zero_le_one, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall' (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = r ^ finrank ℝ E * μ.real (closedBall 0 1) := by
simp only [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall' μ x hr, ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_eq_mul_right_iff,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal_eq_iff]
left
positivity
theorem addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall :
μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1) = μ (ball 0 1) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono ball_subset_closedBall)
have A : Tendsto
(fun r : ℝ => ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1)) (𝓝[<] 1)
(𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal ((1 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1))) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul ?_ (by simp) tendsto_const_nhds (by simp)
exact ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal ((tendsto_id'.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds).pow _)
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_one] at A
refine le_of_tendsto A ?_
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT zero_lt_one] with r hr
rw [← addHaar_closedBall' μ (0 : E) hr.1.le]
exact measure_mono (closedBall_subset_ball hr.2)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias addHaar_closed_unit_ball_eq_addHaar_unit_ball := addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall
theorem addHaar_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (closedBall x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [addHaar_closedBall' μ x hr, addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = r ^ finrank ℝ E * μ.real (ball 0 1) := by
simp [addHaar_real_closedBall' μ x hr, measureReal_def,
addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_eq_addHaar_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x r) = μ (ball x r) := by
by_cases h : r < 0
· rw [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty.mpr h, Metric.ball_eq_empty.mpr h.le]
push_neg at h
rw [addHaar_closedBall μ x h, addHaar_ball μ x h]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall_eq_addHaar_real_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = μ.real (ball x r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall_eq_addHaar_ball μ x r]
theorem addHaar_sphere_of_ne_zero (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : μ (sphere x r) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h)
· simp only [empty_diff, measure_empty, ← closedBall_diff_ball, closedBall_eq_empty.2 h]
· rw [← closedBall_diff_ball,
measure_diff ball_subset_closedBall measurableSet_ball.nullMeasurableSet
measure_ball_lt_top.ne,
addHaar_ball_of_pos μ _ h, addHaar_closedBall μ _ h.le, tsub_self]
theorem addHaar_sphere [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : μ (sphere x r) = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | h)
· rw [sphere_zero, measure_singleton]
· exact addHaar_sphere_of_ne_zero μ x h
theorem addHaar_singleton_add_smul_div_singleton_add_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (x y : E)
(s t : Set E) : μ ({x} + r • s) / μ ({y} + r • t) = μ s / μ t :=
calc
μ ({x} + r • s) / μ ({y} + r • t) = ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ s *
(ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ t)⁻¹ := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, addHaar_smul, image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, abs_pow,
singleton_add]
| _ = ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * (ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E))⁻¹ *
(μ s * (μ t)⁻¹) := by
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv]
· ring
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 538 | 541 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly
equicontinuous on `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous at `x₀` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is very useful for
developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous on `S` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is
uniformly continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*.
This is very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly
for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is uniformly continuous on `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*. This is very useful
for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
| {S : Set X'} {x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := t k) F S x₀) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold ContinuousWithinAt nhdsWithin at hk ⊢
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 568 | 571 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/Adjunctions.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
open scoped List
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
rcases h with - | ⟨L₁, L₂⟩
simp [List.nil_eq_append_iff] at h'
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩ <;> simp_all
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp +contextual [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; simpa using ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun _ b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl =>
subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
| head h₁₂ h ih =>
subst_vars
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := p
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction h generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl => exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| tail hLL' h ih =>
obtain @⟨s, e, a, b⟩ := h
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨_, _, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem red_iff_irreducible {x1 b1 x2 b2} (h : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2)) :
Red [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] L ↔ L = [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] := by
apply reflTransGen_iff_eq
generalize eq : [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] = L'
intro L h'
cases h'
simp only [List.cons_eq_append_iff, List.cons.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, and_false,
List.nil_eq_append_iff, exists_const, or_self, or_false, List.cons_ne_nil] at eq
rcases eq with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp at h
/-- If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `xw₁` reduces to `yw₂`, then
`w₁` reduces to `x⁻¹yw₂`. -/
@[to_additive "If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `x + w₁` reduces
to `y + w₂`, then `w₁` reduces to `-x + y + w₂`."]
theorem inv_of_red_of_ne {x1 b1 x2 b2} (H1 : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2))
(H2 : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ((x2, b2) :: L₂)) : Red L₁ ((x1, not b1) :: (x2, b2) :: L₂) := by
have : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ([(x2, b2)] ++ L₂) := H2
rcases to_append_iff.1 this with ⟨_ | ⟨p, L₃⟩, L₄, eq, h₁, h₂⟩
· simp [nil_iff] at h₁
· cases eq
show Red (L₃ ++ L₄) ([(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] ++ L₂)
apply append_append _ h₂
have h₁ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] := cons_cons h₁
have h₂ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) L₃ := Step.cons_not_rev.to_red
rcases church_rosser h₁ h₂ with ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩
rw [red_iff_irreducible H1] at h₁
rwa [h₁] at h₂
open List -- for <+ notation
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.sublist (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : L₂ <+ L₁ := by
cases H; simp
/-- If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of `w₁`. -/
@[to_additive "If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of
`w₁`."]
protected theorem sublist : Red L₁ L₂ → L₂ <+ L₁ :=
@reflTransGen_of_transitive_reflexive
_ (fun a b => b <+ a) _ _ _
(fun l => List.Sublist.refl l)
(fun _a _b _c hab hbc => List.Sublist.trans hbc hab)
(fun _ _ => Red.Step.sublist)
@[to_additive]
theorem length_le (h : Red L₁ L₂) : L₂.length ≤ L₁.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[to_additive]
theorem sizeof_of_step : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)},
Step L₁ L₂ → sizeOf L₂ < sizeOf L₁
| _, _, @Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by
induction L1 with
| nil =>
dsimp
omega
| cons hd tl ih =>
dsimp
exact Nat.add_lt_add_left ih _
@[to_additive]
theorem length (h : Red L₁ L₂) : ∃ n, L₁.length = L₂.length + 2 * n := by
induction h with
| refl => exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
| tail _h₁₂ h₂₃ ih =>
rcases ih with ⟨n, eq⟩
exists 1 + n
simp [Nat.mul_add, eq, (Step.length h₂₃).symm, add_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem antisymm (h₁₂ : Red L₁ L₂) (h₂₁ : Red L₂ L₁) : L₁ = L₂ :=
h₂₁.sublist.antisymm h₁₂.sublist
end Red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.equivalence_join_red]
theorem equivalence_join_red : Equivalence (Join (@Red α)) :=
equivalence_join_reflTransGen fun _ b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, ReflTransGen.single hcd⟩
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.join_red_of_step]
theorem join_red_of_step (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
join_of_single reflexive_reflTransGen h.to_red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.eqvGen_step_iff_join_red]
theorem eqvGen_step_iff_join_red : EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
have : EqvGen (Join Red) L₁ L₂ := h.mono fun _ _ => join_red_of_step
equivalence_join_red.eqvGen_iff.1 this)
(join_of_equivalence (Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _) fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_equivalence (Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _) EqvGen.rel)
end FreeGroup
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeGroup α` is the free group generated by `α`.
This is a group equipped with a function `FreeGroup.of : α → FreeGroup α` which has
the following universal property: if `G` is any group, and `f : α → G` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeGroup.lift f : FreeGroup α →* G`.
A typical element of `FreeGroup α` is a formal product of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses, quotient by reduction.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x⁻¹ * y * y * x * y⁻¹` is a
"typical" element of `FreeGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeGroup α` is isomorphic to `Multiplicative ℤ`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeGroup α` is not commutative.
-/
@[to_additive
"
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAddGroup α` is the free additive group generated by `α`.
This is a group equipped with a function `FreeAddGroup.of : α → FreeAddGroup α` which has
the following universal property: if `G` is any group, and `f : α → G` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeAddGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeAddGroup.lift f : FreeAddGroup α →+ G`.
A typical element of `FreeAddGroup α` is a formal sum of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses, quotient by reduction.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `-x + y + y + x + -y` is a
\"typical\" element of `FreeAddGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAddGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAddGroup α` is isomorphic to `ℤ`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeAddGroup α` is not commutative.
"]
def FreeGroup (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quot <| @FreeGroup.Red.Step α
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- The canonical map from `List (α × Bool)` to the free group on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from `List (α × Bool)` to the free additive group on `α`."]
def mk (L : List (α × Bool)) : FreeGroup α :=
Quot.mk Red.Step L
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk : Quot.mk Red.Step L = mk L :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_lift_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.lift f H (mk L) = f L :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_liftOn_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.liftOn (mk L) f H = f L :=
rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_map_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → List (β × Bool))
(H : (Red.Step ⇒ Red.Step) f f) : Quot.map f H (mk L) = mk (f L) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : One (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨mk []⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem one_eq_mk : (1 : FreeGroup α) = mk [] :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeGroup α) := by unfold FreeGroup; infer_instance
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨fun x y =>
Quot.liftOn x
(fun L₁ =>
Quot.liftOn y (fun L₂ => mk <| L₁ ++ L₂) fun _L₂ _L₃ H =>
Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_left H)
fun _L₁ _L₂ H => Quot.inductionOn y fun _L₃ => Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_right H⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_mk : mk L₁ * mk L₂ = mk (L₁ ++ L₂) :=
rfl
/-- Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its inverse. -/
@[to_additive "Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its
negative."]
def invRev (w : List (α × Bool)) : List (α × Bool) :=
(List.map (fun g : α × Bool => (g.1, not g.2)) w).reverse
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_length : (invRev L₁).length = L₁.length := by simp [invRev]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_invRev : invRev (invRev L₁) = L₁ := by
simp [invRev, List.map_reverse, Function.comp_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_empty : invRev ([] : List (α × Bool)) = [] :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_append : invRev (L₁ ++ L₂) = invRev L₂ ++ invRev L₁ := by simp [invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_cons {a : (α × Bool)} : invRev (a :: L) = invRev L ++ invRev [a] := by
simp [invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_involutive : Function.Involutive (@invRev α) := fun _ => invRev_invRev
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_injective : Function.Injective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.injective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_surjective : Function.Surjective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_bijective : Function.Bijective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.bijective
@[to_additive]
instance : Inv (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨Quot.map invRev
(by
intro a b h
cases h
simp [invRev])⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mk : (mk L)⁻¹ = mk (invRev L) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) := by
obtain ⟨a, b, x, y⟩ := h
simp [FreeGroup.invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red L₁ L₂) : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.lift _ (fun _a _b => Red.Step.invRev) h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Red.step_invRev_iff :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) ↔ Red.Step L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem red_invRev_iff : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Group (FreeGroup α) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
inv := Inv.inv
mul_assoc := by rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩ ⟨L₃⟩; simp
one_mul := by rintro ⟨L⟩; rfl
mul_one := by rintro ⟨L⟩; simp [one_eq_mk]
inv_mul_cancel := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact
List.recOn L rfl fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih =>
Eq.trans (Quot.sound <| by simp [invRev, one_eq_mk]) ih
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pow_mk (n : ℕ) : mk L ^ n = mk (List.flatten <| List.replicate n L) :=
match n with
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_mk, mul_mk, List.replicate_succ, List.flatten_cons]
/-- `of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type by sending each
element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element. -/
@[to_additive "`of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type
by sending each element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element."]
def of (x : α) : FreeGroup α :=
mk [(x, true)]
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.exact : mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
calc
mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ := Iff.intro Quot.eqvGen_exact Quot.eqvGen_sound
_ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ := eqvGen_step_iff_join_red
/-- The canonical map from the type to the free group is an injection. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from the type to the additive free group is an injection."]
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (@of α) := fun _ _ H => by
let ⟨L₁, hx, hy⟩ := Red.exact.1 H
simp [Red.singleton_iff] at hx hy; aesop
section lift
variable {β : Type v} [Group β] (f : α → β) {x y : FreeGroup α}
/-- Given `f : α → β` with `β` a group, the canonical map `List (α × Bool) → β` -/
@[to_additive "Given `f : α → β` with `β` an additive group, the canonical map
`List (α × Bool) → β`"]
def Lift.aux : List (α × Bool) → β := fun L =>
List.prod <| L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.lift {f : α → β} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Lift.aux f L₁ = Lift.aux f L₂ := by
obtain @⟨_, _, _, b⟩ := H; cases b <;> simp [Lift.aux]
/-- If `β` is a group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to a group homomorphism
from the free group over `α` to `β` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply)
"If `β` is an additive group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to an
additive group homomorphism from the free additive group over `α` to `β`"]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ (FreeGroup α →* β) where
toFun f :=
MonoidHom.mk' (Quot.lift (Lift.aux f) fun _ _ => Red.Step.lift) <| by
rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩; simp [Lift.aux]
invFun g := g ∘ of
left_inv f := List.prod_singleton
right_inv g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact List.recOn L
(g.map_one.symm)
(by
rintro ⟨x, _ | _⟩ t (ih : _ = g (mk t))
· show _ = g ((of x)⁻¹ * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih
· show _ = g (of x * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih)
variable {f}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.mk : lift f (mk L) = List.prod (L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.of {x} : lift f (of x) = f x :=
List.prod_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* β) (hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = FreeGroup.lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ FreeGroup.of = f)) x
/-- Two homomorphisms out of a free group are equal if they are equal on generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two homomorphisms out of a free additive group are equal if they are
equal on generators. See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]."]
theorem ext_hom {G : Type*} [Group G] (f g : FreeGroup α →* G) (h : ∀ a, f (of a) = g (of a)) :
f = g :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext h
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_of_eq_id (α) : lift of = MonoidHom.id (FreeGroup α) :=
lift.apply_symm_apply (MonoidHom.id _)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.of_eq (x : FreeGroup α) : lift FreeGroup.of x = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_of_eq_id α) x
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.range_le {s : Subgroup β} (H : Set.range f ⊆ s) : (lift f).range ≤ s := by
rintro _ ⟨⟨L⟩, rfl⟩
exact List.recOn L s.one_mem fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih ↦
Bool.recOn b (by simpa using s.mul_mem (s.inv_mem <| H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
(by simpa using s.mul_mem (H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.range_eq_closure : (lift f).range = Subgroup.closure (Set.range f) := by
apply le_antisymm (lift.range_le Subgroup.subset_closure)
rw [Subgroup.closure_le]
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨FreeGroup.of a, by simp only [lift.of]⟩
/-- The generators of `FreeGroup α` generate `FreeGroup α`. That is, the subgroup closure of the
set of generators equals `⊤`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_range_of (α) :
Subgroup.closure (Set.range (FreeGroup.of : α → FreeGroup α)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← lift.range_eq_closure, lift_of_eq_id]
exact MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 Function.surjective_id
end lift
section Map
variable {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {x y : FreeGroup α}
/-- Any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to a group homomorphism from the free group over
`α` to the free group over `β`. -/
@[to_additive "Any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to an additive group homomorphism from
the additive free group over `α` to the additive free group over `β`."]
def map : FreeGroup α →* FreeGroup β :=
MonoidHom.mk'
(Quot.map (List.map fun x => (f x.1, x.2)) fun L₁ L₂ H => by cases H; simp)
(by rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩; simp)
variable {f}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.mk : map f (mk L) = mk (L.map fun x => (f x.1, x.2)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.id (x : FreeGroup α) : map id x = x := by rcases x with ⟨L⟩; simp [List.map_id']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.id' (x : FreeGroup α) : map (fun z => z) x = x :=
map.id x
@[to_additive]
theorem map.comp {γ : Type w} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x) :
map g (map f x) = map (g ∘ f) x := by
rcases x with ⟨L⟩; simp [Function.comp_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.of {x} : map f (of x) = of (f x) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* FreeGroup β)
(hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = FreeGroup.of (f x)) :
∀ {x}, g x = map f x := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact List.recOn L g.map_one fun ⟨x, b⟩ t (ih : g (FreeGroup.mk t) = map f (FreeGroup.mk t)) =>
Bool.recOn b
(show g ((FreeGroup.of x)⁻¹ * FreeGroup.mk t) =
FreeGroup.map f ((FreeGroup.of x)⁻¹ * FreeGroup.mk t) by
simp [g.map_mul, g.map_inv, hg, ih])
(show g (FreeGroup.of x * FreeGroup.mk t) =
FreeGroup.map f (FreeGroup.of x * FreeGroup.mk t) by simp [g.map_mul, hg, ih])
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_lift : map f x = lift (of ∘ f) x :=
Eq.symm <| map.unique _ fun x => by simp
/-- Equivalent types give rise to multiplicatively equivalent free groups.
The converse can be found in `Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.GeneratorEquiv`, as
`Equiv.ofFreeGroupEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps apply)
"Equivalent types give rise to additively equivalent additive free groups."]
def freeGroupCongr {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : FreeGroup α ≃* FreeGroup β where
toFun := map e
invFun := map e.symm
left_inv x := by simp [Function.comp, map.comp]
right_inv x := by simp [Function.comp, map.comp]
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem freeGroupCongr_refl : freeGroupCongr (Equiv.refl α) = MulEquiv.refl _ :=
MulEquiv.ext map.id
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem freeGroupCongr_symm {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : (freeGroupCongr e).symm = freeGroupCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem freeGroupCongr_trans {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ) :
(freeGroupCongr e).trans (freeGroupCongr f) = freeGroupCongr (e.trans f) :=
MulEquiv.ext <| map.comp _ _
end Map
section Prod
variable [Group α] (x y : FreeGroup α)
/-- If `α` is a group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to a homomorphism from the
free group over `α` to `α`. This is the multiplicative version of `FreeGroup.sum`. -/
@[to_additive "If `α` is an additive group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to an
additive homomorphism from the additive free group over `α` to `α`."]
def prod : FreeGroup α →* α :=
lift id
variable {x y}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk : prod (mk L) = List.prod (L.map fun x => cond x.2 x.1 x.1⁻¹) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.of {x : α} : prod (of x) = x :=
lift.of
@[to_additive]
theorem prod.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* α) (hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = x) {x} : g x = prod x :=
lift.unique g hg
end Prod
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_eq_prod_map {β : Type v} [Group β] {f : α → β} {x} : lift f x = prod (map f x) := by
rw [← lift.unique (prod.comp (map f)) (by simp), MonoidHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
section Sum
variable [AddGroup α] (x y : FreeGroup α)
/-- If `α` is a group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to a homomorphism from the
free group over `α` to `α`. This is the additive version of `Prod`. -/
def sum : α :=
@prod (Multiplicative _) _ x
variable {x y}
@[simp]
theorem sum_mk : sum (mk L) = List.sum (L.map fun x => cond x.2 x.1 (-x.1)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum.of {x : α} : sum (of x) = x :=
@prod.of _ (_) _
-- note: there are no bundled homs with different notation in the domain and codomain, so we copy
-- these manually
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_mul : sum (x * y) = sum x + sum y :=
(@prod (Multiplicative _) _).map_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_one : sum (1 : FreeGroup α) = 0 :=
(@prod (Multiplicative _) _).map_one
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_inv : sum x⁻¹ = -sum x :=
(prod : FreeGroup (Multiplicative α) →* Multiplicative α).map_inv _
end Sum
/-- The bijection between the free group on the empty type, and a type with one element. -/
@[to_additive "The bijection between the additive free group on the empty type, and a type with one
element."]
def freeGroupEmptyEquivUnit : FreeGroup Empty ≃ Unit where
toFun _ := ()
invFun _ := 1
left_inv := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨⟨⟨⟩, _⟩, _⟩⟩; rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟩ => rfl
/-- The bijection between the free group on a singleton, and the integers. -/
def freeGroupUnitEquivInt : FreeGroup Unit ≃ ℤ where
toFun x := sum (by
revert x
exact ↑(map fun _ => (1 : ℤ)))
invFun x := of () ^ x
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
simp only [quot_mk_eq_mk, map.mk, sum_mk, List.map_map]
exact List.recOn L
(by rfl)
(fun ⟨⟨⟩, b⟩ tl ih => by
cases b <;> simp [zpow_add] at ih ⊢ <;> rw [ih] <;> rfl)
right_inv x :=
Int.induction_on x (by simp)
(fun i ih => by
simp only [zpow_natCast, map_pow, map.of] at ih
simp [zpow_add, ih])
(fun i ih => by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, map_inv, map_pow, map.of, sum.map_inv, neg_inj] at ih
simp [zpow_add, ih, sub_eq_add_neg])
section Category
variable {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Monad FreeGroup.{u} where
pure {_α} := of
map {_α _β f} := map f
bind {_α _β x f} := lift f x
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator)]
protected theorem induction_on {C : FreeGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeGroup α) (C1 : C 1)
(Cp : ∀ x, C <| pure x) (Ci : ∀ x, C (pure x) → C (pure x)⁻¹)
(Cm : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C z :=
Quot.inductionOn z fun L =>
List.recOn L C1 fun ⟨x, b⟩ _tl ih => Bool.recOn b (Cm _ _ (Ci _ <| Cp x) ih) (Cm _ _ (Cp x) ih)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (x : α) : f <$> (pure x : FreeGroup α) = pure (f x) :=
map.of
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_one (f : α → β) : f <$> (1 : FreeGroup α) = 1 :=
(map f).map_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul (f : α → β) (x y : FreeGroup α) : f <$> (x * y) = f <$> x * f <$> y :=
(map f).map_mul x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_inv (f : α → β) (x : FreeGroup α) : f <$> x⁻¹ = (f <$> x)⁻¹ :=
(map f).map_inv x
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_bind (f : α → FreeGroup β) (x) : pure x >>= f = f x :=
lift.of
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_bind (f : α → FreeGroup β) : 1 >>= f = 1 :=
(lift f).map_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_bind (f : α → FreeGroup β) (x y : FreeGroup α) : x * y >>= f = (x >>= f) * (y >>= f) :=
(lift f).map_mul _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_bind (f : α → FreeGroup β) (x : FreeGroup α) : x⁻¹ >>= f = (x >>= f)⁻¹ :=
(lift f).map_inv _
@[to_additive]
instance : LawfulMonad FreeGroup.{u} := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x =>
FreeGroup.induction_on x (map_one id) (fun x => map_pure id x) (fun x ih => by rw [map_inv, ih])
fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [map_mul, ihx, ihy])
(pure_bind := fun x f => pure_bind f x)
(bind_assoc := fun x =>
FreeGroup.induction_on x
(by intros; iterate 3 rw [one_bind])
(fun x => by intros; iterate 2 rw [pure_bind])
(fun x ih => by intros; (iterate 3 rw [inv_bind]); rw [ih])
(fun x y ihx ihy => by intros; (iterate 3 rw [mul_bind]); rw [ihx, ihy]))
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x =>
FreeGroup.induction_on x
(by rw [one_bind, map_one])
(fun x => by rw [pure_bind, map_pure])
(fun x ih => by rw [inv_bind, map_inv, ih])
(fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [mul_bind, map_mul, ihx, ihy]))
end Category
end FreeGroup
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 1,160 | 1,185 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
/-!
# The Ahlswede-Zhang identity
This file proves the Ahlswede-Zhang identity, which is a nontrivial relation between the size of the
"truncated unions" of a set family. It sharpens the Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality
`Finset.lubell_yamamoto_meshalkin_inequality_sum_card_div_choose`, by making explicit the correction
term.
For a set family `𝒜` over a ground set of size `n`, the Ahlswede-Zhang identity states that the sum
of `|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|)` over all set `A` is exactly `1`. This implies the LYM
inequality since for an antichain `𝒜` and every `A ∈ 𝒜` we have
`|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|) = 1 / n.choose |A|`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.truncatedSup`: `s.truncatedSup a` is the supremum of all `b ≥ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊤` if there are none.
* `Finset.truncatedInf`: `s.truncatedInf a` is the infimum of all `b ≤ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊥` if there are none.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum`: LHS of the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.le_infSum`: The sum of `1 / n.choose |A|` over an antichain is less than the RHS of
the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum_eq_one`: Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
## References
* [R. Ahlswede, Z. Zhang, *An identity in combinatorial extremal theory*](https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(90)90023-G)
* [D. T. Tru, *An AZ-style identity and Bollobás deficiency*](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2007.03.005)
-/
section
variable (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [Nonempty α] {m n : ℕ}
open Finset Fintype Nat
private lemma binomial_sum_eq (h : n < m) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) : ℚ) = 1 := by
set f : ℕ → ℚ := fun i ↦ n.choose i * (m.choose i : ℚ)⁻¹ with hf
suffices ∀ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i - f (i + 1) = n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) by
rw [← sum_congr rfl this, sum_range_sub', hf]
simp [choose_self, choose_zero_right, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
intro i h₁
rw [mem_range] at h₁
have h₁ := le_of_lt_succ h₁
have h₂ := h₁.trans_lt h
have h₃ := h₂.le
have hi₄ : (i + 1 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := i.cast_add_one_ne_zero
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq m i)
push_cast at this
dsimp [f, hf]
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq n i)
push_cast at this
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have : (m - i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero_of_ne (cast_lt.mpr h₂).ne'
have : (m.choose i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos h₂.le).ne'
field_simp
ring
private lemma Fintype.sum_div_mul_card_choose_card :
∑ s : Finset α, (card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (↑k)⁻¹ + 1 := by
rw [← powerset_univ, powerset_card_disjiUnion, sum_disjiUnion]
have : ∀ {x : ℕ}, ∀ s ∈ powersetCard x (univ : Finset α),
(card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α / ((card α - x) * (card α).choose x) := by
intros n s hs
rw [mem_powersetCard_univ.1 hs]
simp_rw [sum_congr rfl this, sum_const, card_powersetCard, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div,
mul_comm, ← mul_div]
rw [← mul_sum, ← mul_inv_cancel₀ (cast_ne_zero.mpr card_ne_zero : (card α : ℚ) ≠ 0), ← mul_add,
add_comm _ ((card α)⁻¹ : ℚ), ← sum_insert (f := fun x : ℕ ↦ (x⁻¹ : ℚ)) not_mem_range_self,
← range_succ]
have (n) (hn : n ∈ range (card α + 1)) :
((card α).choose n / ((card α - n) * (card α).choose n) : ℚ) = (card α - n : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
rw [div_mul_cancel_right₀]
exact cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos <| mem_range_succ_iff.1 hn).ne'
simp only [sum_congr rfl this, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, cast_eq_zero]
convert Or.inl <| sum_range_reflect _ _ with a ha
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, cast_sub (mem_range_succ_iff.mp ha)]
end
open scoped FinsetFamily
namespace Finset
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Truncated supremum, truncated infimum -/
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [BoundedOrder β] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma sup_aux [DecidableLE α] : a ∈ lowerClosure s → {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.Nonempty :=
fun ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, hab⟩⟩
private lemma lower_aux [DecidableEq α] :
a ∈ lowerClosure ↑(s ∪ t) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s ∨ a ∈ lowerClosure t := by
rw [coe_union, lowerClosure_union, LowerSet.mem_sup_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [OrderTop α]
/-- The supremum of the elements of `s` less than `a` if there are some, otherwise `⊤`. -/
def truncatedSup (s : Finset α) (a : α) : α :=
if h : a ∈ lowerClosure s then {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.sup' (sup_aux h) id else ⊤
lemma truncatedSup_of_mem (h : a ∈ lowerClosure s) :
truncatedSup s a = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.sup' (sup_aux h) id := dif_pos h
lemma truncatedSup_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ lowerClosure s) : truncatedSup s a = ⊤ := dif_neg h
@[simp] lemma truncatedSup_empty (a : α) : truncatedSup ∅ a = ⊤ := truncatedSup_of_not_mem (by simp)
@[simp] lemma truncatedSup_singleton (b a : α) : truncatedSup {b} a = if a ≤ b then b else ⊤ := by
simp [truncatedSup]; split_ifs <;> simp [Finset.filter_true_of_mem, *]
lemma le_truncatedSup : a ≤ truncatedSup s a := by
rw [truncatedSup]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨ℬ, hb, h⟩ := h
exact h.trans <| le_sup' id <| mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, h⟩
· exact le_top
lemma map_truncatedSup [DecidableLE β] (e : α ≃o β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
e (truncatedSup s a) = truncatedSup (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) (e a) := by
have : e a ∈ lowerClosure (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding : Set β) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s := by simp
simp_rw [truncatedSup, apply_dite e, map_finset_sup', map_top, this]
congr with h
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv,
OrderIso.le_iff_le, id, sup'_map]
lemma truncatedSup_of_isAntichain (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) (s : Set α)) (ha : a ∈ s) :
truncatedSup s a = a := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_truncatedSup
simp_rw [truncatedSup_of_mem (subset_lowerClosure ha), sup'_le_iff, mem_filter]
rintro b ⟨hb, hab⟩
exact (hs.eq ha hb hab).ge
variable [DecidableEq α]
lemma truncatedSup_union (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup s a ⊔ truncatedSup t a := by
simpa only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, ht, lower_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), filter_union] using
sup'_union _ _ _
lemma truncatedSup_union_left (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∉ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup s a := by
simp only [mem_lowerClosure, mem_coe, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and] at ht
simp only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, filter_union, filter_false_of_mem ht, union_empty,
lower_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), ht]
lemma truncatedSup_union_right (hs : a ∉ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup t a := by rw [union_comm, truncatedSup_union_left ht hs]
lemma truncatedSup_union_of_not_mem (hs : a ∉ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∉ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = ⊤ := truncatedSup_of_not_mem fun h ↦ (lower_aux.1 h).elim hs ht
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[BoundedOrder β] [DecidableLE β] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma inf_aux [DecidableLE α] : a ∈ upperClosure s → {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.Nonempty :=
fun ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, hab⟩⟩
private lemma upper_aux [DecidableEq α] :
a ∈ upperClosure ↑(s ∪ t) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s ∨ a ∈ upperClosure t := by
rw [coe_union, upperClosure_union, UpperSet.mem_inf_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [BoundedOrder α]
/-- The infimum of the elements of `s` less than `a` if there are some, otherwise `⊥`. -/
def truncatedInf (s : Finset α) (a : α) : α :=
if h : a ∈ upperClosure s then {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.inf' (inf_aux h) id else ⊥
lemma truncatedInf_of_mem (h : a ∈ upperClosure s) :
truncatedInf s a = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.inf' (inf_aux h) id := dif_pos h
lemma truncatedInf_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ upperClosure s) : truncatedInf s a = ⊥ := dif_neg h
lemma truncatedInf_le : truncatedInf s a ≤ a := by
unfold truncatedInf
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h
exact hba.trans' <| inf'_le id <| mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, ‹_›⟩
· exact bot_le
@[simp] lemma truncatedInf_empty (a : α) : truncatedInf ∅ a = ⊥ := truncatedInf_of_not_mem (by simp)
@[simp] lemma truncatedInf_singleton (b a : α) : truncatedInf {b} a = if b ≤ a then b else ⊥ := by
simp only [truncatedInf, coe_singleton, upperClosure_singleton, UpperSet.mem_Ici_iff,
filter_congr_decidable, id_eq]
split_ifs <;> simp [Finset.filter_true_of_mem, *]
lemma map_truncatedInf (e : α ≃o β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
e (truncatedInf s a) = truncatedInf (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) (e a) := by
have : e a ∈ upperClosure (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s := by simp
simp_rw [truncatedInf, apply_dite e, map_finset_inf', map_bot, this]
congr with h
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv,
OrderIso.le_iff_le, id, inf'_map]
lemma truncatedInf_of_isAntichain (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) (s : Set α)) (ha : a ∈ s) :
truncatedInf s a = a := by
refine le_antisymm truncatedInf_le ?_
simp_rw [truncatedInf_of_mem (subset_upperClosure ha), le_inf'_iff, mem_filter]
rintro b ⟨hb, hba⟩
exact (hs.eq hb ha hba).ge
variable [DecidableEq α]
lemma truncatedInf_union (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf s a ⊓ truncatedInf t a := by
simpa only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, ht, upper_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), filter_union] using
inf'_union _ _ _
lemma truncatedInf_union_left (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∉ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf s a := by
simp only [mem_upperClosure, mem_coe, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and] at ht
simp only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, filter_union, filter_false_of_mem ht, union_empty,
upper_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), ht]
lemma truncatedInf_union_right (hs : a ∉ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf t a := by
rw [union_comm, truncatedInf_union_left ht hs]
lemma truncatedInf_union_of_not_mem (hs : a ∉ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∉ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = ⊥ :=
truncatedInf_of_not_mem <| by rw [coe_union, upperClosure_union]; exact fun h ↦ h.elim hs ht
end SemilatticeInf
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma infs_aux : a ∈ lowerClosure ↑(s ⊼ t) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s ∧ a ∈ lowerClosure t := by
rw [coe_infs, lowerClosure_infs, LowerSet.mem_inf_iff]
private lemma sups_aux : a ∈ upperClosure ↑(s ⊻ t) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s ∧ a ∈ upperClosure t := by
rw [coe_sups, upperClosure_sups, UpperSet.mem_sup_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [BoundedOrder α]
lemma truncatedSup_infs (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ⊼ t) a = truncatedSup s a ⊓ truncatedSup t a := by
simp only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, ht, infs_aux.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩, sup'_inf_sup', filter_infs_le]
simp_rw [← image_inf_product]
rw [sup'_image]
simp [Function.uncurry_def]
lemma truncatedInf_sups (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ⊻ t) a = truncatedInf s a ⊔ truncatedInf t a := by
simp only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, ht, sups_aux.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩, inf'_sup_inf', filter_sups_le]
simp_rw [← image_sup_product]
rw [inf'_image]
simp [Function.uncurry_def]
| lemma truncatedSup_infs_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ lowerClosure s ⊓ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ⊼ t) a = ⊤ :=
truncatedSup_of_not_mem <| by rwa [coe_infs, lowerClosure_infs]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/AhlswedeZhang.lean | 273 | 275 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
| exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 167 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
· exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
· simp only [← ih]
exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
theorem lcs_le_self : N.lcs k ≤ N := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih).trans (N.lie_le_right ⊤)
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap : lowerCentralSeries R L N k = (N.lcs k).comap N.incl := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at ih ⊢
have : N.lcs k ≤ N.incl.range := by
rw [N.range_incl]
apply lcs_le_self
rw [ih, LieSubmodule.comap_bracket_eq _ N.incl _ N.ker_incl this]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs : (lowerCentralSeries R L N k).map N.incl = N.lcs k := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.map_comap_incl, inf_eq_right]
apply lcs_le_self
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot:
lowerCentralSeries R L N k = ⊥ ↔ lcs k N = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← N.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs, ← LieModuleHom.le_ker_iff_map]
simpa
· rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, comap_incl_eq_bot]
simp [h]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable {M₂ : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (R L M)
theorem antitone_lowerCentralSeries : Antitone <| lowerCentralSeries R L M := by
intro l k
induction k generalizing l with
| zero => exact fun h ↦ (Nat.le_zero.mp h).symm ▸ le_rfl
| succ k ih =>
intro h
rcases Nat.of_le_succ h with (hk | hk)
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (ih hk)).trans (LieSubmodule.lie_le_right _ _)
· exact hk.symm ▸ le_rfl
theorem eventually_iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq [IsArtinian R M] :
∀ᶠ l in Filter.atTop, ⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = lowerCentralSeries R L M l := by
have h_wf : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ :=
LieSubmodule.wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → lowerCentralSeries R L M n = lowerCentralSeries R L M m⟩ :=
h_wf.monotone_chain_condition ⟨_, antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M⟩
refine Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun l hl ↦ le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun m ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases le_or_lt l m with h | h
· rw [← hn _ hl, ← hn _ (hl.trans h)]
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (le_of_lt h)
theorem trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot : IsTrivial L M ↔ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp
· rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] at h; apply IsTrivial.mk; intro x m; apply h
apply LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
simp only [LieSubmodule.top_coe, Subtype.exists, LieSubmodule.mem_top, exists_prop, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf]
exact ⟨x, m, rfl⟩
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries (x : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x)^[k] m ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Function.iterate_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ',
toEnd_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ih
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ (x y : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y)^[k] m ∈
lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hk : 2 * k.succ = (2 * k + 1) + 1 := rfl
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ', hk,
toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ?_
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top y) ih
variable {R L M}
theorem map_lowerCentralSeries_le (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [lowerCentralSeries_zero, le_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih
lemma map_lowerCentralSeries_eq {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f = lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
apply le_antisymm (map_lowerCentralSeries_le k f)
induction k with
| zero =>
rwa [lowerCentralSeries_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, top_le_iff, f.map_top,
f.range_eq_top]
| succ =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
apply LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
assumption
end
open LieAlgebra
theorem derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries (k : ℕ) :
derivedSeries R L k ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L L k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero]
| succ k h =>
have h' : derivedSeries R L k ≤ ⊤ := by simp only [le_top]
rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie h' h
/-- A Lie module is nilpotent if its lower central series reaches 0 (in a finite number of
steps). -/
@[mk_iff isNilpotent_iff_int]
class IsNilpotent : Prop where
mk_int ::
nilpotent_int : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- See also `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top`. -/
lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent L M ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [isNilpotent_iff_int, SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
lemma IsNilpotent.nilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mp ‹_›
variable {R L} in
lemma IsNilpotent.mk {k : ℕ} (h : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥) : IsNilpotent L M :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mpr ⟨k, h⟩
@[deprecated IsNilpotent.nilpotent (since := "2025-01-07")]
theorem exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
@[simp] lemma iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact iInf_le _ _
end
section
variable {R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem _root_.LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L N ↔ ∃ k, N.lcs k = ⊥ := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L N]
refine exists_congr fun k => ?_
rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap k, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot,
inf_eq_right.mpr (N.lcs_le_self k)]
variable (R L M)
instance (priority := 100) trivialIsNilpotent [IsTrivial L M] : IsNilpotent L M :=
⟨by use 1; simp⟩
instance instIsNilpotentSup (M₁ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) [IsNilpotent L M₁] [IsNilpotent L M₂] :
IsNilpotent L (M₁ ⊔ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₁
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₂
let lcs_eq_bot {m n} (N : LieSubmodule R L M) (le : m ≤ n) (hn : lowerCentralSeries R L N m = ⊥) :
lowerCentralSeries R L N n = ⊥ := by
simpa [hn] using antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L N le
have h₁ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₁ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₁ (Nat.le_max_left k l) hk
have h₂ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₂ (Nat.le_max_right k l) hl
refine (isNilpotent_iff R L (M₁ + M₂)).mpr ⟨k ⊔ l, ?_⟩
simp [LieSubmodule.add_eq_sup, (M₁ ⊔ M₂).lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.lcs_sup,
(M₁.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₁,
(M₂.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₂, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot]
theorem exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k : ℕ, ∀ x : L, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
use k
intro x; ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @LieSubmodule.mem_bot R L M, ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R L M x m k
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x) := by
change ∃ k, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0
have := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
tauto
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ [IsNilpotent L M] (x y : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y) := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
replace hM : lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hM]; exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (by omega)
use k
ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← LieSubmodule.mem_bot (R := R) (L := L), ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ R L M x y m k
@[simp] lemma maxGenEigenSpace_toEnd_eq_top [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
((toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace 0) = ⊤ := by
ext m
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul, sub_zero, Submodule.mem_top,
iff_true]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
exact ⟨k, by simp [hk x]⟩
/-- If the quotient of a Lie module `M` by a Lie submodule on which the Lie algebra acts trivially
is nilpotent then `M` is nilpotent.
This is essentially the Lie module equivalent of the fact that a central
extension of nilpotent Lie algebras is nilpotent. See `LieAlgebra.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient`
below for the corresponding result for Lie algebras. -/
theorem nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient {N : LieSubmodule R L M} (h₁ : N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M)
(h₂ : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) : IsNilpotent L M := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L] at h₂ ⊢
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
use k + 1
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
suffices lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N by
replace this := LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (le_trans this h₁)
rwa [ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, ← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact map_lowerCentralSeries_le k (LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' N)
theorem isNilpotent_quotient_iff :
IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N) ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L]
refine exists_congr fun k ↦ ?_
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, map_lowerCentralSeries_eq k
(LieSubmodule.Quotient.surjective_mk' N)]
theorem iInf_lcs_le_of_isNilpotent_quot (h : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (isNilpotent_quotient_iff R L M N).mp h
exact iInf_le_of_le k hk
end
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series `M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is
the natural number `k` (the number of inclusions).
For a non-nilpotent module, we use the junk value 0. -/
noncomputable def nilpotencyLength : ℕ :=
sInf {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff [IsNilpotent L M] :
nilpotencyLength L M = 0 ↔ Subsingleton M := by
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
have hs : s.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent ℤ L M
exact ⟨k, hk⟩
change sInf s = 0 ↔ _
rw [← LieSubmodule.subsingleton_iff ℤ L M, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ←
lowerCentralSeries_zero, @eq_comm (LieSubmodule ℤ L M)]
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ Nat.sInf_mem hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
exact Or.inl h
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff (k : ℕ) :
nilpotencyLength L M = k + 1 ↔
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⊥ ∧ lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≠ ⊥ := by
have aux (k : ℕ) : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ ↔ lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
let s := {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
rw [aux, ne_eq, aux]
change sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s
have hs : ∀ k₁ k₂, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s := by
rintro k₁ k₂ h₁₂ (h₁ : lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k₁ = ⊥)
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (h₁ ▸ antitone_lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M h₁₂)
exact Nat.sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff hs k
@[simp]
theorem nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff [Nontrivial M] :
nilpotencyLength L M = 1 ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff ℤ, ← trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot]
simp
theorem isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one [IsNilpotent L M] (h : nilpotencyLength L M ≤ 1) :
IsTrivial L M := by
nontriviality M
rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.mp h with h | h
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff] at h; infer_instance
· rwa [nilpotencyLength_eq_one_iff] at h
end
/-- Given a non-trivial nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series
`M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is the `k-1`th term in the lower central series (the last
non-trivial term).
For a trivial or non-nilpotent module, this is the bottom submodule, `⊥`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCentralSeriesLast : LieSubmodule R L M :=
match nilpotencyLength L M with
| 0 => ⊥
| k + 1 => lowerCentralSeries R L M k
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv [LieModule R L M] :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
rcases h : nilpotencyLength L M with - | k
· exact bot_le
· rw [le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot]
rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff R, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at h
exact h.1
theorem nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast [LieModule R L M] [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent L M] :
Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) := by
rw [LieSubmodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, lowerCentralSeriesLast]
cases h : nilpotencyLength L M
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_zero_iff, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton] at h
contradiction
· rw [nilpotencyLength_eq_succ_iff R] at h
exact h.2
theorem lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial [IsNilpotent L M] (h : ¬ IsTrivial L M) :
lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 := by
rw [lowerCentralSeriesLast]
replace h : 1 < nilpotencyLength L M := by
by_contra contra
have := isTrivial_of_nilpotencyLength_le_one L M (not_lt.mp contra)
contradiction
rcases hk : nilpotencyLength L M with - | k <;> rw [hk] at h
· contradiction
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries _ _ _ (Nat.lt_succ.mp h)
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- For a nilpotent Lie module `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, the first term in the lower central series
of `M` contains a non-zero element on which `L` acts trivially unless the entire action is trivial.
Taking `M = L`, this provides a useful characterisation of Abelian-ness for nilpotent Lie
algebras. -/
lemma disjoint_lowerCentralSeries_maxTrivSubmodule_iff [IsNilpotent L M] :
Disjoint (lowerCentralSeries R L M 1) (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) ↔ IsTrivial L M := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp⟩
nontriviality M
by_contra contra
have : lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 ⊓ maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
le_inf_iff.mpr ⟨lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_of_not_isTrivial R L M contra,
lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M⟩
suffices ¬ Nontrivial (lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M) by
exact this (nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
rw [h.eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
exact this ▸ not_nontrivial _
theorem nontrivial_max_triv_of_isNilpotent [Nontrivial M] [IsNilpotent L M] :
Nontrivial (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) :=
Set.nontrivial_mono (lowerCentralSeriesLast_le_max_triv R L M)
(nontrivial_lowerCentralSeriesLast R L M)
@[simp]
theorem coe_lcs_range_toEnd_eq (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k : Submodule R M) =
lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', ←
(lowerCentralSeries R (toEnd R L M).range M k).mem_toSubmodule, ih]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨-, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, -, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact
⟨⟨toEnd R L M x, LieHom.mem_range_self _ x⟩, LieSubmodule.mem_top _, n, hn, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isNilpotent_range_toEnd_iff :
IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M).range M ↔ IsNilpotent L M := by
simp only [isNilpotent_iff R _ M]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ <;> use k <;>
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj] at hk ⊢ <;>
simpa using hk
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- The upper (aka ascending) central series.
See also `LieSubmodule.lcs`. -/
def ucs (k : ℕ) : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
normalizer^[k]
@[simp]
theorem ucs_zero : N.ucs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ucs_succ (k : ℕ) : N.ucs (k + 1) = (N.ucs k).normalizer :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' normalizer k N
theorem ucs_add (k l : ℕ) : N.ucs (k + l) = (N.ucs l).ucs k :=
Function.iterate_add_apply normalizer k l N
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem ucs_mono (k : ℕ) (h : N₁ ≤ N₂) : N₁.ucs k ≤ N₂.ucs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simpa
| succ k ih =>
simp only [ucs_succ]
gcongr
theorem ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self (h : N₁.normalizer = N₁) (k : ℕ) : N₁.ucs k = N₁ := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rwa [ucs_succ, ih]
/-- If a Lie module `M` contains a self-normalizing Lie submodule `N`, then all terms of the upper
central series of `M` are contained in `N`.
An important instance of this situation arises from a Cartan subalgebra `H ⊆ L` with the roles of
`L`, `M`, `N` played by `H`, `L`, `H`, respectively. -/
theorem ucs_le_of_normalizer_eq_self (h : N₁.normalizer = N₁) (k : ℕ) :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs k ≤ N₁ := by
rw [← ucs_eq_self_of_normalizer_eq_self h k]
gcongr
simp
theorem lcs_add_le_iff (l k : ℕ) : N₁.lcs (l + k) ≤ N₂ ↔ N₁.lcs l ≤ N₂.ucs k := by
induction k generalizing l with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
rw [(by abel : l + (k + 1) = l + 1 + k), ih, ucs_succ, lcs_succ, top_lie_le_iff_le_normalizer]
theorem lcs_le_iff (k : ℕ) : N₁.lcs k ≤ N₂ ↔ N₁ ≤ N₂.ucs k := by
convert lcs_add_le_iff (R := R) (L := L) (M := M) 0 k
rw [zero_add]
theorem gc_lcs_ucs (k : ℕ) :
GaloisConnection (fun N : LieSubmodule R L M => N.lcs k) fun N : LieSubmodule R L M =>
N.ucs k :=
fun _ _ => lcs_le_iff k
theorem ucs_eq_top_iff (k : ℕ) : N.ucs k = ⊤ ↔ LieModule.lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← lcs_le_iff]; rfl
variable (R) in
theorem _root_.LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L M ↔ ∃ k, (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs k = ⊤ := by
rw [LieModule.isNilpotent_iff R]; exact exists_congr fun k => by simp [ucs_eq_top_iff]
theorem ucs_comap_incl (k : ℕ) :
((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs k).comap N.incl = (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L N).ucs k := by
induction k with
| zero => exact N.ker_incl
| succ k ih => simp [← ih]
theorem isNilpotent_iff_exists_self_le_ucs :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L N ↔ ∃ k, N ≤ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs k := by
simp_rw [LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top R, ← ucs_comap_incl, comap_incl_eq_top]
theorem ucs_bot_one : (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).ucs 1 = LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule R L M := by
simp [LieSubmodule.normalizer_bot_eq_maxTrivSubmodule]
end LieSubmodule
section Morphisms
open LieModule Function
variable [LieModule R L M]
variable {L₂ M₂ : Type*} [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₂]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L₂ M₂]
variable {f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂} {g : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
variable (hfg : ∀ x m, ⁅f x, g m⁆ = g ⁅x, m⁆)
include hfg in
theorem lieModule_lcs_map_le (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Submodule R M).map g ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L₂ M₂ k := by
induction k with
| zero =>
simp [LinearMap.range_eq_top, Submodule.map_top]
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', Submodule.map_span,
Submodule.span_le]
rintro m₂ ⟨m, ⟨x, n, m_n, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule]
have : ∃ y : L₂, ∃ n : lowerCentralSeries R L₂ M₂ k, ⁅y, n⁆ = g m := by
use f x, ⟨g m_n, ih (Submodule.mem_map_of_mem h₁)⟩
simp [hfg x m_n, h₂]
obtain ⟨y, n, hn⟩ := this
rw [← hn]
apply LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie
· simp
· exact SetLike.coe_mem n
variable [LieModule R L₂ M₂] (hg_inj : Injective g)
include hg_inj hfg in
theorem Function.Injective.lieModuleIsNilpotent [IsNilpotent L₂ M₂] : IsNilpotent L M := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L₂ M₂
rw [isNilpotent_iff R]
use k
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj] at hk ⊢
apply Submodule.map_injective_of_injective hg_inj
simpa [hk] using lieModule_lcs_map_le hfg k
variable (hf_surj : Surjective f) (hg_surj : Surjective g)
include hf_surj hg_surj hfg in
theorem Function.Surjective.lieModule_lcs_map_eq (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Submodule R M).map g = lowerCentralSeries R L₂ M₂ k := by
refine le_antisymm (lieModule_lcs_map_le hfg k) ?_
induction k with
| zero => simpa [LinearMap.range_eq_top]
| succ k ih =>
suffices
{m | ∃ (x : L₂) (n : _), n ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k ∧ ⁅x, g n⁆ = m} ⊆
g '' {m | ∃ (x : L) (n : _), n ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k ∧ ⁅x, n⁆ = m} by
simp only [← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at this
simp_rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span',
Submodule.map_span, LieSubmodule.mem_top, true_and, ← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule]
refine Submodule.span_mono (Set.Subset.trans ?_ this)
rintro m₁ ⟨x, n, hn, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨n', hn', rfl⟩ := ih hn
exact ⟨x, n', hn', rfl⟩
rintro m₂ ⟨x, n, hn, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf_surj x
exact ⟨⁅y, n⁆, ⟨y, n, hn, rfl⟩, (hfg y n).symm⟩
include hf_surj hg_surj hfg in
theorem Function.Surjective.lieModuleIsNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] : IsNilpotent L₂ M₂ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
rw [isNilpotent_iff R]
use k
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj] at hk ⊢
simp [← hf_surj.lieModule_lcs_map_eq hfg hg_surj k, hk]
theorem Equiv.lieModule_isNilpotent_iff (f : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) (g : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
(hfg : ∀ x m, ⁅f x, g m⁆ = g ⁅x, m⁆) : IsNilpotent L M ↔ IsNilpotent L₂ M₂ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have hg : Surjective (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := g.surjective
exact f.surjective.lieModuleIsNilpotent hfg hg
· have hg : Surjective (g.symm : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) := g.symm.surjective
refine f.symm.surjective.lieModuleIsNilpotent (fun x m => ?_) hg
rw [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LieEquiv.coe_toLieHom, ← g.symm_apply_apply ⁅f.symm x, g.symm m⁆, ←
hfg, f.apply_symm_apply, g.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LieModule.isNilpotent_of_top_iff :
IsNilpotent (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) M ↔ IsNilpotent L M :=
Equiv.lieModule_isNilpotent_iff LieSubalgebra.topEquiv (1 : M ≃ₗ[R] M) fun _ _ => rfl
| @[simp] lemma LieModule.isNilpotent_of_top_iff' :
IsNilpotent L {x // x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M)} ↔ IsNilpotent L M :=
Equiv.lieModule_isNilpotent_iff 1 (LinearEquiv.ofTop ⊤ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
end Morphisms
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 703 | 708 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
/-!
# Trivial Lie modules and Abelian Lie algebras
The action of a Lie algebra `L` on a module `M` is trivial if `⁅x, m⁆ = 0` for all `x ∈ L` and
`m ∈ M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, triviality corresponds to the
concept of an Abelian Lie algebra.
In this file we define these concepts and provide some related definitions and results.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.IsTrivial`
* `IsLieAbelian`
* `commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring`
* `LieModule.ker`
* `LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.center`
## Tags
lie algebra, abelian, commutative, center
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
/-- A Lie (ring) module is trivial iff all brackets vanish. -/
class LieModule.IsTrivial (L : Type v) (M : Type w) [Bracket L M] [Zero M] : Prop where
trivial : ∀ (x : L) (m : M), ⁅x, m⁆ = 0
@[simp]
theorem trivial_lie_zero (L : Type v) (M : Type w) [Bracket L M] [Zero M] [LieModule.IsTrivial L M]
(x : L) (m : M) : ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
LieModule.IsTrivial.trivial x m
instance LieModule.instIsTrivialOfSubsingleton {L M : Type*}
[LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [LieRingModule L M] [Subsingleton L] : LieModule.IsTrivial L M :=
⟨fun x m ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.eq_zero x, zero_lie]⟩
instance LieModule.instIsTrivialOfSubsingleton' {L M : Type*}
[LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [LieRingModule L M] [Subsingleton M] : LieModule.IsTrivial L M :=
⟨fun x m ↦ by simp_rw [Subsingleton.eq_zero m, lie_zero]⟩
/-- A Lie algebra is Abelian iff it is trivial as a Lie module over itself. -/
abbrev IsLieAbelian (L : Type v) [Bracket L L] [Zero L] : Prop :=
LieModule.IsTrivial L L
instance LieIdeal.isLieAbelian_of_trivial (R : Type u) (L : Type v) [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
[LieAlgebra R L] (I : LieIdeal R L) [h : LieModule.IsTrivial L I] : IsLieAbelian I where
trivial x y := by apply h.trivial
theorem Function.Injective.isLieAbelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] {f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂}
(h₁ : Function.Injective f) (_ : IsLieAbelian L₂) : IsLieAbelian L₁ :=
{ trivial := fun x y => h₁ <|
calc
f ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅f x, f y⁆ := LieHom.map_lie f x y
_ = 0 := trivial_lie_zero _ _ _ _
_ = f 0 := f.map_zero.symm}
theorem Function.Surjective.isLieAbelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] {f : L₁ →ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂}
(h₁ : Function.Surjective f) (h₂ : IsLieAbelian L₁) : IsLieAbelian L₂ :=
{ trivial := fun x y => by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h₁ x
obtain ⟨v, rfl⟩ := h₁ y
rw [← LieHom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, LieHom.map_zero] }
theorem lie_abelian_iff_equiv_lie_abelian {R : Type u} {L₁ : Type v} {L₂ : Type w} [CommRing R]
[LieRing L₁] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₁] [LieAlgebra R L₂] (e : L₁ ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L₂) :
IsLieAbelian L₁ ↔ IsLieAbelian L₂ :=
⟨e.symm.injective.isLieAbelian, e.injective.isLieAbelian⟩
theorem commutative_ring_iff_abelian_lie_ring {A : Type v} [Ring A] :
Std.Commutative (α := A) (· * ·) ↔ IsLieAbelian A := by
have h₁ : Std.Commutative (α := A) (· * ·) ↔ ∀ a b : A, a * b = b * a :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
have h₂ : IsLieAbelian A ↔ ∀ a b : A, ⁅a, b⁆ = 0 := ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
simp only [h₁, h₂, LieRing.of_associative_ring_bracket, sub_eq_zero]
section Center
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w) (N : Type w₁)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N] [LieModule R L N]
namespace LieModule
/-- The kernel of the action of a Lie algebra `L` on a Lie module `M` as a Lie ideal in `L`. -/
protected def ker : LieIdeal R L :=
(toEnd R L M).ker
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_ker (x : L) : x ∈ LieModule.ker R L M ↔ ∀ m : M, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 := by
simp only [LieModule.ker, LieHom.mem_ker, LinearMap.ext_iff, LinearMap.zero_apply,
toEnd_apply_apply]
lemma isFaithful_iff_ker_eq_bot : IsFaithful R L M ↔ LieModule.ker R L M = ⊥ := by
rw [isFaithful_iff', LieSubmodule.ext_iff]
aesop
@[simp] lemma ker_eq_bot [IsFaithful R L M] :
LieModule.ker R L M = ⊥ :=
(isFaithful_iff_ker_eq_bot R L M).mp inferInstance
/-- The largest submodule of a Lie module `M` on which the Lie algebra `L` acts trivially. -/
def maxTrivSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := { m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 }
zero_mem' x := lie_zero x
add_mem' {x y} hx hy z := by rw [lie_add, hx, hy, add_zero]
smul_mem' c x hx y := by rw [lie_smul, hx, smul_zero]
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [hm, lie_zero]
@[simp]
theorem mem_maxTrivSubmodule (m : M) : m ∈ maxTrivSubmodule R L M ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsTrivial L (maxTrivSubmodule R L M) where trivial x m := Subtype.ext (m.property x)
@[simp]
theorem ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot (I : LieIdeal R L) :
⁅I, maxTrivSubmodule R L M⁆ = ⊥ := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span,
LieSubmodule.bot_toSubmodule, Submodule.span_eq_bot]
rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
exact hm x
theorem le_max_triv_iff_bracket_eq_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} :
N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M ↔ ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h m hm => ?_⟩
· rw [← le_bot_iff, ← ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot R L M ⊤]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ h
· rw [mem_maxTrivSubmodule]
rw [LieSubmodule.lie_eq_bot_iff] at h
exact fun x => h x (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) m hm
theorem trivial_iff_le_maximal_trivial (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
IsTrivial L N ↔ N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M :=
⟨fun h m hm x => IsTrivial.casesOn h fun h => Subtype.ext_iff.mp (h x ⟨m, hm⟩), fun h =>
{ trivial := fun x m => Subtype.ext (h m.2 x) }⟩
theorem isTrivial_iff_max_triv_eq_top : IsTrivial L M ↔ maxTrivSubmodule R L M = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h⟩; ext; simp only [mem_maxTrivSubmodule, h, forall_const, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
· intro h; constructor; intro x m; revert x
rw [← mem_maxTrivSubmodule R L M, h]; exact LieSubmodule.mem_top m
variable {R L M N}
/-- `maxTrivSubmodule` is functorial. -/
def maxTrivHom (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) : maxTrivSubmodule R L M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ maxTrivSubmodule R L N where
toFun m := ⟨f m, fun x =>
(LieModuleHom.map_lie _ _ _).symm.trans <|
(congr_arg f (m.property x)).trans (LieModuleHom.map_zero _)⟩
map_add' m n := by ext; simp
map_smul' t m := by ext; simp
map_lie' {x m} := by simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_maxTrivHom_apply (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (m : maxTrivSubmodule R L M) :
(maxTrivHom f m : N) = f m :=
rfl
/-- The maximal trivial submodules of Lie-equivalent Lie modules are Lie-equivalent. -/
def maxTrivEquiv (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) : maxTrivSubmodule R L M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ maxTrivSubmodule R L N :=
{ maxTrivHom (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) with
toFun := maxTrivHom (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N)
invFun := maxTrivHom (e.symm : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M)
left_inv := fun m => by ext; simp [LieModuleEquiv.coe_toLieModuleHom]
right_inv := fun n => by ext; simp [LieModuleEquiv.coe_toLieModuleHom] }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_maxTrivEquiv_apply (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (m : maxTrivSubmodule R L M) :
(maxTrivEquiv e m : N) = e ↑m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem maxTrivEquiv_of_refl_eq_refl :
maxTrivEquiv (LieModuleEquiv.refl : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M) = LieModuleEquiv.refl := by
ext; simp only [coe_maxTrivEquiv_apply, LieModuleEquiv.refl_apply]
@[simp]
theorem maxTrivEquiv_of_equiv_symm_eq_symm (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) :
(maxTrivEquiv e).symm = maxTrivEquiv e.symm :=
rfl
/-- A linear map between two Lie modules is a morphism of Lie modules iff the Lie algebra action
on it is trivial. -/
def maxTrivLinearMapEquivLieModuleHom : maxTrivSubmodule R L (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[R] M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N where
toFun f :=
{ toLinearMap := f.val
| map_lie' := fun {x m} => by
have hf : ⁅x, f.val⁆ m = 0 := by rw [f.property x, LinearMap.zero_apply]
rw [LieHom.lie_apply, sub_eq_zero, ← LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe] at hf; exact hf.symm}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Abelian.lean | 201 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Bhavik Mehta, Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Defs
/-!
# Binomial coefficients
This file defines binomial coefficients and proves simple lemmas (i.e. those not
requiring more imports).
For the lemma that `n.choose k` counts the `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_powersetCard` in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset`.
## Main definition and results
* `Nat.choose`: binomial coefficients, defined inductively
* `Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial`: a proof that `choose n k = n! / (k! * (n - k)!)`
* `Nat.choose_symm`: symmetry of binomial coefficients
* `Nat.choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left`: `choose n k` is increasing for small values of `k`
* `Nat.choose_le_middle`: `choose n r` is maximised when `r` is `n/2`
* `Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose`: Relates binomial coefficients to the descending
factorial. This is used to prove `Nat.choose_le_pow` and variants. We provide similar statements
for the ascending factorial.
* `Nat.multichoose`: whereas `choose` counts combinations, `multichoose` counts multicombinations.
The fact that this is indeed the correct counting function for multisets is proved in
`Sym.card_sym_eq_multichoose` in `Data.Sym.Card`.
* `Nat.multichoose_eq` : a proof that `multichoose n k = (n + k - 1).choose k`.
This is central to the "stars and bars" technique in informal mathematics, where we switch between
counting multisets of size `k` over an alphabet of size `n` to counting strings of `k` elements
("stars") separated by `n-1` dividers ("bars"). See `Data.Sym.Card` for more detail.
## Tags
binomial coefficient, combination, multicombination, stars and bars
-/
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. For the fact that this is the number of `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element
set, see `Fintype.card_powersetCard`. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_left (n k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose (n + 1) k = choose n (k - 1) + choose n k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rfl
theorem choose_succ_right (n k : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
choose n (k + 1) = choose (n - 1) k + choose (n - 1) (k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, n = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hn
rfl
theorem choose_eq_choose_pred_add {n k : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose n k = choose (n - 1) (k - 1) + choose (n - 1) k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rw [choose_succ_right _ _ hn, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, _ + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| _ + 1, _ + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
theorem add_choose (i j : ℕ) : (i + j).choose j = (i + j)! / (i ! * j !) := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_left j i), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_comm]
theorem add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (i j : ℕ) :
(i + j).choose j * i ! * j ! = (i + j)! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_right_comm]
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : k ! * (n - k)! ∣ n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]; exact Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add (i j : ℕ) : i ! * j ! ∣ (i + j)! := by
suffices i ! * (i + j - i) ! ∣ (i + j)! by
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left i j] at this
exact factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n - k) = choose n k := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial hk, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.sub_le _ _),
Nat.sub_sub_self hk, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : Nat.choose n a = Nat.choose n b := by
suffices choose n (n - b) = choose n b by
rw [h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right] at this; rwa [h]
exact choose_symm (h ▸ le_add_left _ _)
theorem choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a + b) a = choose (a + b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
theorem choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m := by
apply choose_symm_of_eq_add
rw [Nat.add_comm m 1, Nat.add_assoc 1 m m, Nat.add_comm (2 * m) 1, Nat.two_mul m]
theorem choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) := by
have e : (n + 1) * choose n k = choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) + choose n k * (k + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm (choose _ _), ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq]
rw [← Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self_right : ∀ n : ℕ, (n + 1).choose n = n + 1
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right n, choose_self]
theorem choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k * (n + 1) = (n + 1).choose k * (n + 1 - k) := by
cases k with
| zero => simp
| succ k =>
obtain hk | hk := le_or_lt (k + 1) (n + 1)
· rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, ← choose_succ_right_eq, ← succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ hk)]
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (n.lt_succ_self.trans hk), Nat.zero_mul,
Nat.zero_mul]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) :
(n + 1).ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k).choose k := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n + k - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial <| Nat.le_add_left k n, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
← factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' (n k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k - 1).choose k := by
cases n
· cases k
· rw [ascFactorial_zero, choose_zero_right, factorial_zero, Nat.mul_one]
· simp only [zero_ascFactorial, zero_eq, Nat.zero_add, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.le_zero_eq, Nat.sub_zero, choose_succ_self, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
simp only [succ_add_sub_one]
theorem factorial_dvd_ascFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.ascFactorial k :=
⟨(n + k - 1).choose k, ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _⟩
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k).choose k = (n + 1).ascFactorial k / k ! := by
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel k.factorial_pos
rw [← ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' <| factorial_dvd_ascFactorial _ _).symm
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial' (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k - 1).choose k = n.ascFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _).symm
theorem descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) : n.descFactorial k = k ! * n.choose k := by
obtain h | h := Nat.lt_or_ge n k
· rw [descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.2 h, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial h, ← factorial_mul_descFactorial h, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem factorial_dvd_descFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.descFactorial k :=
⟨n.choose k, descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _⟩
theorem choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k = n.descFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _).symm
/-- A faster implementation of `choose`, to be used during bytecode evaluation
| and in compiled code. -/
def fast_choose n k := Nat.descFactorial n k / Nat.factorial k
@[csimp] lemma choose_eq_fast_choose : Nat.choose = fast_choose :=
funext (fun _ => funext (Nat.choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial _))
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 268 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
|
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 632 | 634 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases.Finite
/-!
# (Co)product of a family of filters
In this file we define two filters on `Π i, α i` and prove some basic properties of these filters.
* `Filter.pi (f : Π i, Filter (α i))` to be the maximal filter on `Π i, α i` such that
`∀ i, Filter.Tendsto (Function.eval i) (Filter.pi f) (f i)`. It is defined as
`Π i, Filter.comap (Function.eval i) (f i)`. This is a generalization of `Filter.prod` to indexed
products.
* `Filter.coprodᵢ (f : Π i, Filter (α i))`: a generalization of `Filter.coprod`; it is the supremum
of `comap (eval i) (f i)`.
-/
open Set Function Filter
namespace Filter
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {f f₁ f₂ : (i : ι) → Filter (α i)} {s : (i : ι) → Set (α i)}
{p : ∀ i, α i → Prop}
section Pi
theorem tendsto_eval_pi (f : ∀ i, Filter (α i)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (eval i) (pi f) (f i) :=
tendsto_iInf' i tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_pi {β : Type*} {m : β → ∀ i, α i} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto m l (pi f) ↔ ∀ i, Tendsto (fun x => m x i) l (f i) := by
simp only [pi, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
/-- If a function tends to a product `Filter.pi f` of filters, then its `i`-th component tends to
`f i`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of topological spaces. -/
alias ⟨Tendsto.apply, _⟩ := tendsto_pi
theorem le_pi {g : Filter (∀ i, α i)} : g ≤ pi f ↔ ∀ i, Tendsto (eval i) g (f i) :=
tendsto_pi
@[mono]
theorem pi_mono (h : ∀ i, f₁ i ≤ f₂ i) : pi f₁ ≤ pi f₂ :=
iInf_mono fun i => comap_mono <| h i
theorem mem_pi_of_mem (i : ι) {s : Set (α i)} (hs : s ∈ f i) : eval i ⁻¹' s ∈ pi f :=
mem_iInf_of_mem i <| preimage_mem_comap hs
theorem pi_mem_pi {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (h : ∀ i ∈ I, s i ∈ f i) : I.pi s ∈ pi f := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_eq_iInter]
refine mem_iInf_of_iInter hI (fun i => ?_) Subset.rfl
exact preimage_mem_comap (h i i.2)
theorem mem_pi {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
s ∈ pi f ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ∃ t : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ I.pi t ⊆ s := by
constructor
· simp only [pi, mem_iInf', mem_comap, pi_def]
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hVf, -, rfl, -⟩
choose t htf htV using hVf
exact ⟨I, If, t, htf, iInter₂_mono fun i _ => htV i⟩
· rintro ⟨I, If, t, htf, hts⟩
exact mem_of_superset (pi_mem_pi If fun i _ => htf i) hts
theorem mem_pi' {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
s ∈ pi f ↔ ∃ I : Finset ι, ∃ t : ∀ i, Set (α i), (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ Set.pi (↑I) t ⊆ s :=
mem_pi.trans exists_finite_iff_finset
theorem mem_of_pi_mem_pi [∀ i, NeBot (f i)] {I : Set ι} (h : I.pi s ∈ pi f) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) :
s i ∈ f i := by
classical
rcases mem_pi.1 h with ⟨I', -, t, htf, hts⟩
refine mem_of_superset (htf i) fun x hx => ?_
have : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty := fun i => nonempty_of_mem (htf i)
choose g hg using this
have : update g i x ∈ I'.pi t := fun j _ => by
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne) <;> simp [*]
simpa using hts this i hi
@[simp]
theorem pi_mem_pi_iff [∀ i, NeBot (f i)] {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) :
I.pi s ∈ pi f ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, s i ∈ f i :=
⟨fun h _i hi => mem_of_pi_mem_pi h hi, pi_mem_pi hI⟩
theorem Eventually.eval_pi {i : ι} (hf : ∀ᶠ x : α i in f i, p i x) :
∀ᶠ x : ∀ i : ι, α i in pi f, p i (x i) := (tendsto_eval_pi _ _).eventually hf
theorem eventually_pi [Finite ι] (hf : ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in f i, p i x) :
∀ᶠ x : ∀ i, α i in pi f, ∀ i, p i (x i) := eventually_all.2 fun _i => (hf _).eval_pi
theorem hasBasis_pi {ι' : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, ι' i → Set (α i)} {p : ∀ i, ι' i → Prop}
(h : ∀ i, (f i).HasBasis (p i) (s i)) :
(pi f).HasBasis (fun If : Set ι × ∀ i, ι' i => If.1.Finite ∧ ∀ i ∈ If.1, p i (If.2 i))
fun If : Set ι × ∀ i, ι' i => If.1.pi fun i => s i <| If.2 i := by
simpa [Set.pi_def] using hasBasis_iInf' fun i => (h i).comap (eval i : (∀ j, α j) → α i)
theorem hasBasis_pi_same_index {κ : Type*} {p : κ → Prop} {s : Π i : ι, κ → Set (α i)}
(h : ∀ i : ι, (f i).HasBasis p (s i))
(h_dir : ∀ I : Set ι, ∀ k : ι → κ, I.Finite → (∀ i ∈ I, p (k i)) →
∃ k₀, p k₀ ∧ ∀ i ∈ I, s i k₀ ⊆ s i (k i)) :
(pi f).HasBasis (fun Ik : Set ι × κ ↦ Ik.1.Finite ∧ p Ik.2)
(fun Ik ↦ Ik.1.pi (fun i ↦ s i Ik.2)) := by
refine hasBasis_pi h |>.to_hasBasis ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨I, k⟩ ⟨hI, hk⟩
rcases h_dir I k hI hk with ⟨k₀, hk₀, hk₀'⟩
exact ⟨⟨I, k₀⟩, ⟨hI, hk₀⟩, Set.pi_mono hk₀'⟩
· rintro ⟨I, k⟩ ⟨hI, hk⟩
exact ⟨⟨I, fun _ ↦ k⟩, ⟨hI, fun _ _ ↦ hk⟩, subset_rfl⟩
theorem HasBasis.pi_self {α : Type*} {κ : Type*} {f : Filter α} {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) :
(pi fun _ ↦ f).HasBasis (fun Ik : Set ι × κ ↦ Ik.1.Finite ∧ p Ik.2)
(fun Ik ↦ Ik.1.pi (fun _ ↦ s Ik.2)) := by
refine hasBasis_pi_same_index (fun _ ↦ h) (fun I k hI hk ↦ ?_)
rcases h.mem_iff.mp (biInter_mem hI |>.mpr fun i hi ↦ h.mem_of_mem (hk i hi))
with ⟨k₀, hk₀, hk₀'⟩
exact ⟨k₀, hk₀, fun i hi ↦ hk₀'.trans (biInter_subset_of_mem hi)⟩
theorem le_pi_principal (s : (i : ι) → Set (α i)) :
𝓟 (univ.pi s) ≤ pi fun i ↦ 𝓟 (s i) :=
le_pi.2 fun i ↦ tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun _f hf ↦ hf i trivial
/-- The indexed product of finitely many principal filters
is the principal filter corresponding to the cylinder `Set.univ.pi s`.
If the index type is infinite, then `mem_pi_principal` and `hasBasis_pi_principal` may be useful. -/
@[simp]
theorem pi_principal [Finite ι] (s : (i : ι) → Set (α i)) :
pi (fun i ↦ 𝓟 (s i)) = 𝓟 (univ.pi s) := by
simp [Filter.pi, Set.pi_def]
/-- The indexed product of a (possibly, infinite) family of principal filters
is generated by the finite `Set.pi` cylinders.
If the index type is finite, then the indexed product of principal filters
is a pricipal filter, see `pi_principal`. -/
theorem mem_pi_principal {t : Set ((i : ι) → α i)} :
t ∈ pi (fun i ↦ 𝓟 (s i)) ↔ ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ I.pi s ⊆ t :=
(hasBasis_pi (fun i ↦ hasBasis_principal _)).mem_iff.trans <| by simp
/-- The indexed product of a (possibly, infinite) family of principal filters
is generated by the finite `Set.pi` cylinders.
If the index type is finite, then the indexed product of principal filters
is a pricipal filter, see `pi_principal`. -/
theorem hasBasis_pi_principal (s : (i : ι) → Set (α i)) :
HasBasis (pi fun i ↦ 𝓟 (s i)) Set.Finite (Set.pi · s) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ mem_pi_principal⟩
/-- The indexed product of finitely many pure filters `pure (f i)` is the pure filter `pure f`.
|
If the index type is infinite, then `mem_pi_pure` and `hasBasis_pi_pure` below may be useful. -/
@[simp]
theorem pi_pure [Finite ι] (f : (i : ι) → α i) : pi (pure <| f ·) = pure f := by
simp only [← principal_singleton, pi_principal, univ_pi_singleton]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Pi.lean | 157 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.WithDensity
/-!
# Radon-Nikodym derivative and Lebesgue decomposition for kernels
Let `α` and `γ` be two measurable space, where either `α` is countable or `γ` is
countably generated. Let `κ, η : Kernel α γ` be finite kernels.
Then there exists a function `Kernel.rnDeriv κ η : α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
and a kernel `Kernel.singularPart κ η : Kernel α γ` such that
* `κ = Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a = 0 ↔ κ a ≪ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) a = 0 ↔ κ a ⟂ₘ η a`.
Furthermore, the sets `{a | κ a ≪ η a}` and `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}` are measurable.
When `γ` is countably generated, the construction of the derivative starts from `Kernel.density`:
for two finite kernels `κ' : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `η' : Kernel α γ` with `fst κ' ≤ η'`,
the function `density κ' η' : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` is jointly measurable in the first two arguments
and satisfies that for all `a : α` and all measurable sets `s : Set β` and `A : Set γ`,
`∫ x in A, density κ' η' a x s ∂(η' a) = (κ' a (A ×ˢ s)).toReal`.
We use that definition for `β = Unit` and `κ' = map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))`. We can't choose `η' = η`
in general because we might not have `κ ≤ η`, but if we could, we would get a measurable function
`f` with the property `κ = withDensity η f`, which is the decomposition we want for `κ ≤ η`.
To circumvent that difficulty, we take `η' = κ + η` and thus define `rnDerivAux κ η`.
Finally, `rnDeriv κ η a x` is given by
`ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) / ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)`.
Up to some conversions between `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`, the singular part is
`withDensity (κ + η) (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) - (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)) * rnDeriv κ η)`.
The countably generated measurable space assumption is not needed to have a decomposition for
measures, but the additional difficulty with kernels is to obtain joint measurability of the
derivative. This is why we can't simply define `rnDeriv κ η` by `a ↦ (κ a).rnDeriv (ν a)`
everywhere unless `α` is countable (although `rnDeriv κ η` has that value almost everywhere).
See the construction of `Kernel.density` for details on how the countably generated hypothesis
is used.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv`: a function `α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`: a `Kernel α γ`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.mutuallySingular_singularPart`: for all `a : α`,
`Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv_add_singularPart`:
`Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η = κ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_absolutelyContinuous` : the set `{a | κ a ≪ η a}`
is Measurable
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_mutuallySingular` : the set `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}`
is Measurable
Uniqueness results: if `κ = η.withDensity f + ξ` for measurable `f` and `ξ` is such that
`ξ a ⟂ₘ η a` for some `a : α` then
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_rnDeriv`: `f a =ᵐ[η a] Kernel.rnDeriv κ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_singularPart`: `ξ a = Kernel.singularPart κ η a`
## References
Theorem 1.28 in [O. Kallenberg, Random Measures, Theory and Applications][kallenberg2017].
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter ENNReal
open scoped NNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {κ η : Kernel α γ}
[hαγ : MeasurableSpace.CountableOrCountablyGenerated α γ]
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary function used to define `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv` and
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`.
This has the properties we want for a Radon-Nikodym derivative only if `κ ≪ ν`. The definition of
`rnDeriv κ η` will be built from `rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)`. -/
noncomputable
def rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) : ℝ :=
if hα : Countable α then ((κ a).rnDeriv (η a) x).toReal
else haveI := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
density (map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))) η a x univ
lemma rnDerivAux_nonneg (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} {x : γ} : 0 ≤ rnDerivAux κ η a x := by
rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· exact ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_nonneg ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
lemma rnDerivAux_le_one [IsFiniteKernel η] (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} :
rnDerivAux κ η a ≤ᵐ[η a] 1 := by
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_le_one_of_le (hκη a)] with x hx_le_one
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal zero_le_one ?_
simp only [Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
exact hx_le_one
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_le_one ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
Measurable (fun p : α × γ ↦ Kernel.rnDerivAux κ η p.1 p.2) := by
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_
change Measurable ((fun q : γ × α ↦ (κ q.2).rnDeriv (η q.2) q.1) ∘ Prod.swap)
refine (measurable_from_prod_countable' (fun a ↦ ?_) ?_).comp measurable_swap
· exact Measure.measurable_rnDeriv (κ a) (η a)
· intro a a' c ha'_mem_a
have h_eq : ∀ κ : Kernel α γ, κ a' = κ a := fun κ ↦ by
ext s hs
exact mem_of_mem_measurableAtom ha'_mem_a
(Kernel.measurable_coe κ hs (measurableSet_singleton (κ a s))) rfl
rw [h_eq κ, h_eq η]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact measurable_density _ η MeasurableSet.univ
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux_right (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x : γ ↦ rnDerivAux κ η a x) := by fun_prop
lemma setLIntegral_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η]
(a : α) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) ∂(κ + η) a = κ a s := by
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· have h_ac : κ a ≪ (κ + η) a := Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le (h_le a)
rw [← Measure.setLIntegral_rnDeriv h_ac]
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hs ?_
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top (κ a) ((κ + η) a)] with x hx_lt _
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal hx_lt.ne]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
rw [setLIntegral_density ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le h_le) _
MeasurableSet.univ hs, map_apply' _ (by fun_prop) _ (hs.prod MeasurableSet.univ)]
congr with x
simp
lemma withDensity_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) = κ := by
ext a s hs
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply']
swap; · fun_prop
simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal]
exact setLIntegral_rnDerivAux κ η a hs
lemma withDensity_one_sub_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) = η := by
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
suffices withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
+ withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
= κ + η by
ext a s
have h : (withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
+ withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))) a s
= κ a s + η a s := by
rw [this]
simp
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Measure.coe_add] at h
rwa [withDensity_rnDerivAux, add_comm, ENNReal.add_right_inj (measure_ne_top _ _)] at h
simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal, ENNReal.ofReal_sub _ (rnDerivAux_nonneg h_le), ENNReal.ofReal_one]
rw [withDensity_sub_add_cancel]
· rw [withDensity_one']
· exact measurable_const
· fun_prop
· intro a
filter_upwards [rnDerivAux_le_one h_le] with x hx
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_le_one]
exact hx
/-- A set of points in `α × γ` related to the absolute continuity / mutual singularity of
`κ` and `η`. -/
def mutuallySingularSet (κ η : Kernel α γ) : Set (α × γ) := {p | 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) p.1 p.2}
/-- A set of points in `α × γ` related to the absolute continuity / mutual singularity of
`κ` and `η`. That is,
* `withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) = 0`,
* `singularPart κ η a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ = 0`.
-/
def mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) : Set γ :=
{x | 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x}
lemma mem_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
x ∈ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a ↔ 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x := by
rw [mutuallySingularSetSlice, mem_setOf]
lemma not_mem_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
x ∉ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a ↔ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x < 1 := by
simp [mutuallySingularSetSlice]
| lemma measurableSet_mutuallySingularSet (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
MeasurableSet (mutuallySingularSet κ η) :=
measurable_rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) measurableSet_Ici
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/RadonNikodym.lean | 201 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# With Density
For an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` which is finite
everywhere, we define `withDensity κ f` as the kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. This is
an s-finite kernel.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.withDensity κ (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞)`:
kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. It is defined if `κ` is s-finite. If `f` is finite
everywhere, then this is also an s-finite kernel. The class of s-finite kernels is the smallest
class of kernels that contains finite kernels and which is stable by `withDensity`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.lintegral_withDensity`:
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
variable {κ : Kernel α β} {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Kernel with image `(κ a).withDensity (f a)` if `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, and
with image 0 otherwise. If `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, it satisfies
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f hf a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`. -/
noncomputable def withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
Kernel α β :=
@dite _ (Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (Classical.dec _) (fun hf =>
(⟨fun a => (κ a).withDensity (f a),
by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact hf.setLIntegral_kernel_prod_right hs⟩ : Kernel α β)) fun _ => 0
theorem withDensity_of_not_measurable (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : ¬Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) : withDensity κ f = 0 := by classical exact dif_neg hf
protected theorem withDensity_apply (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) :
withDensity κ f a = (κ a).withDensity (f a) := by
classical
rw [withDensity, dif_pos hf]
rfl
protected theorem withDensity_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
withDensity κ f a s = ∫⁻ b in s, f a b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply κ hf, withDensity_apply' _ s]
nonrec lemma withDensity_congr_ae (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
(hfg : ∀ a, f a =ᵐ[κ a] g a) :
withDensity κ f = withDensity κ g := by
ext a
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf,Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hg, withDensity_congr_ae (hfg a)]
nonrec lemma withDensity_absolutelyContinuous [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) (a : α) :
Kernel.withDensity κ f a ≪ κ a := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
· rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
simp [Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.zero]
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_one (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ 1 = κ := by
ext; rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ measurable_const]; simp
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_one' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ (fun _ _ ↦ 1) = κ := Kernel.withDensity_one _
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ 0 = 0 := by
ext; rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ measurable_const]; simp
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ (fun _ _ ↦ 0) = 0 := Kernel.withDensity_zero _
theorem lintegral_withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) {g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ b, g b ∂withDensity κ f a = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf,
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ (Measurable.of_uncurry_left hf) hg]
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply]
theorem integral_withDensity {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{f : β → E} [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {a : α} {g : α → β → ℝ≥0}
(hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g)) :
∫ b, f b ∂withDensity κ (fun a b => g a b) a = ∫ b, g a b • f b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply, integral_withDensity_eq_integral_smul]
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
theorem withDensity_add_left (κ η : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η]
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) : withDensity (κ + η) f = withDensity κ f + withDensity η f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· ext a s
simp only [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, withDensity_add_measure,
Measure.add_apply]
· simp_rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
rw [zero_add]
theorem withDensity_kernel_sum [Countable ι] (κ : ι → Kernel α β) (hκ : ∀ i, IsSFiniteKernel (κ i))
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
withDensity (Kernel.sum κ) f = Kernel.sum fun i => withDensity (κ i) f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· ext1 a
simp_rw [sum_apply, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, sum_apply,
withDensity_sum (fun n => κ n a) (f a)]
· simp_rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
exact sum_zero.symm
lemma withDensity_add_right [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g)) :
withDensity κ (f + g) = withDensity κ f + withDensity κ g := by
ext a
rw [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hg,
Kernel.withDensity_apply, Pi.add_apply, MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_right]
· fun_prop
· exact hf.add hg
lemma withDensity_sub_add_cancel [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
| (hfg : ∀ a, g a ≤ᵐ[κ a] f a) :
withDensity κ (fun a x ↦ f a x - g a x) + withDensity κ g = withDensity κ f := by
rw [← withDensity_add_right _ hg]
swap; · exact hf.sub hg
refine withDensity_congr_ae κ ((hf.sub hg).add hg) hf (fun a ↦ ?_)
filter_upwards [hfg a] with x hx
rwa [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, tsub_add_cancel_iff_le]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/WithDensity.lean | 147 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, map_smul, hb']⟩
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun _ hb =>
span_induction (hx := hb) h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x _ hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
theorem isFractional_of_fg [IsLocalization S P] {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) :
IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
variable (S) in
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit (R := R) I h
variable (S P P')
variable [IsLocalization S P] [IsLocalization S P']
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun _ => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ FractionalIdeal.map_zero h⟩
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
variable [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
open Classical in
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, FractionalIdeal.map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one]
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x _ hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
rfl
variable {R₁}
@[simp]
theorem spanFinset_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f = 0 ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
simp only [← coeToSubmodule_inj, spanFinset_coe, coe_zero, Submodule.span_eq_bot,
Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
theorem spanFinset_ne_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, f j ≠ 0 := by simp
open Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [IsLocalization S P]
theorem isFractional_span_singleton (x : P) : IsFractional S (span R {x} : Submodule R P) :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_integer_multiple S x
isFractional_span_iff.mpr ⟨a, a.2, fun _ hx' => (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hx').symm ▸ ha⟩
variable (S)
/-- `spanSingleton x` is the fractional ideal generated by `x` if `0 ∉ S` -/
irreducible_def spanSingleton (x : P) : FractionalIdeal S P :=
⟨span R {x}, isFractional_span_singleton x⟩
-- local attribute [semireducible] span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem coe_spanSingleton (x : P) : (spanSingleton S x : Submodule R P) = span R {x} := by
rw [spanSingleton]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_spanSingleton {x y : P} : x ∈ spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : R, z • y = x := by
rw [spanSingleton]
exact Submodule.mem_span_singleton
theorem mem_spanSingleton_self (x : P) : x ∈ spanSingleton S x :=
(mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
variable (P) in
/-- A version of `FractionalIdeal.den_mul_self_eq_num` in terms of fractional ideals. -/
theorem den_mul_self_eq_num' (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P I.den) * I = I.num := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
dsimp only
rw [coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, coe_spanSingleton, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.span_singleton_mul]
convert I.den_mul_self_eq_num using 1
ext
rw [mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists, mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists]
simp [smul_eq_mul, Algebra.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def]
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_le_iff_mem {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton S x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_spanSingleton, Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_coe]
theorem spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton [NoZeroSMulDivisors R P] {x y : P} :
spanSingleton S x = spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : Rˣ, z • x = y := by
rw [← Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, spanSingleton, spanSingleton]
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk
theorem eq_spanSingleton_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal S P) [IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P)] :
I = spanSingleton S (generator (I : Submodule R P)) := by
-- Porting note: this used to be `coeToSubmodule_injective (span_singleton_generator ↑I).symm`
-- but Lean 4 struggled to unify everything. Turned it into an explicit `rw`.
rw [spanSingleton, ← coeToSubmodule_inj, coe_mk, span_singleton_generator]
theorem isPrincipal_iff (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P) ↔ ∃ x, I = spanSingleton S x :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨generator (I : Submodule R P), eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => { principal := ⟨x, Eq.trans (congr_arg _ hx) (coe_spanSingleton _ x)⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_zero : spanSingleton S (0 : P) = 0 := by
ext
simp [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
theorem spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y = 0 ↔ y = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
span_eq_bot.mp (by simpa using congr_arg Subtype.val h : span R {y} = ⊥) y (mem_singleton y),
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff {y : P} : spanSingleton S y ≠ 0 ↔ y ≠ 0 :=
not_congr spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_one : spanSingleton S (1 : P) = 1 := by
ext
refine (mem_spanSingleton S).trans ((exists_congr ?_).trans (mem_one_iff S).symm)
intro x'
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton (x y : P) :
spanSingleton S x * spanSingleton S y = spanSingleton S (x * y) := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, coe_spanSingleton, span_mul_span, singleton_mul_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_pow (x : P) (n : ℕ) : spanSingleton S x ^ n = spanSingleton S (x ^ n) := by
induction' n with n hn
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, spanSingleton_one]
· rw [pow_succ, hn, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_span_singleton (x : R) :
(↑(Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) : FractionalIdeal S P) = spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P x) := by
ext y
refine (mem_coeIdeal S).trans (Iff.trans ?_ (mem_spanSingleton S).symm)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hy'
use x'
rw [smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
· rintro ⟨y', rfl⟩
refine ⟨y' * x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨y', rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_spanSingleton {P'} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [IsLocalization S P']
(x : P) :
canonicalEquiv S P P' (spanSingleton S x) =
spanSingleton S
(IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R)
(fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy) x) := by
apply SetLike.ext_iff.mpr
intro y
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_spanSingleton]
obtain ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ := (mem_canonicalEquiv_apply _ _ _).mp h
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp hx'
use z
rw [IsLocalization.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
· rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply]
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton _).mp h
use z • x
use (mem_spanSingleton _).mpr ⟨z, rfl⟩
simp [IsLocalization.map_smul]
theorem mem_singleton_mul {x y : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
y ∈ spanSingleton S x * I ↔ ∃ y' ∈ I, y = x * y' := by
constructor
· intro h
refine FractionalIdeal.mul_induction_on h ?_ ?_
· intro x' hx' y' hy'
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (mem_spanSingleton S).mp hx'
use a • y', Submodule.smul_mem (I : Submodule R P) a hy'
rw [← ha, Algebra.mul_smul_comm, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
· rintro _ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact ⟨y + y', Submodule.add_mem (I : Submodule R P) hy hy', (mul_add _ _ _).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y', hy', rfl⟩
exact mul_mem_mul ((mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩) hy'
variable (K) in
theorem mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {x y : R₁} (hy : y ∈ R₁⁰) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K x ⟨y, hy⟩) * I = (J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ↔
Ideal.span {x} * I = Ideal.span {y} * J := by
have :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' _ (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) *
spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K y) =
1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_comm, ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one,
IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one]
let y' : (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)ˣ := Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ this
have coe_y' : ↑y' = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (IsLocalization.mk' K (1 : R₁) ⟨y, hy⟩) := rfl
refine Iff.trans ?_ (y'.mul_right_inj.trans coeIdeal_inj)
rw [coe_y', coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, coeIdeal_mul, coeIdeal_span_singleton, ←
mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, ← mul_assoc, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton,
mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ← IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mul_comm (mk' _ _ _), ←
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, IsLocalization.mk'_self, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal {I J : Ideal R₁} {z : K} :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ z * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) = J ↔
Ideal.span {((IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).1 : R₁)} * I =
Ideal.span {((IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).2 : R₁)} * J := by
rw [← mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal K (IsLocalization.sec R₁⁰ z).2.prop,
IsLocalization.mk'_sec K z]
variable [IsDomain R₁]
theorem one_div_spanSingleton (x : K) : 1 / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = spanSingleton R₁⁰ x⁻¹ := by
classical
exact if h : x = 0 then by simp [h] else (eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right _ _ (by simp [h])).symm
@[simp]
theorem div_spanSingleton (J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (d : K) :
J / spanSingleton R₁⁰ d = spanSingleton R₁⁰ d⁻¹ * J := by
rw [← one_div_spanSingleton]
by_cases hd : d = 0
· simp only [hd, spanSingleton_zero, div_zero, zero_mul]
have h_spand : spanSingleton R₁⁰ d ≠ 0 := mt spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff.mp hd
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
dsimp only [val_eq_coe] at hx ⊢ -- Porting note: get rid of the partially applied `coe`s
rw [coe_div h_spand, Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem] at hx
specialize hx d (mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ d)
have h_xd : x = d⁻¹ * (x * d) := by field_simp
rw [coe_mul, one_div_spanSingleton, h_xd]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul (mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ _) hx
· rw [le_div_iff_mul_le h_spand, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, one_div_spanSingleton,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel₀ hd, spanSingleton_one, mul_one]
theorem exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :
∃ (a : R₁) (aI : Ideal R₁), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K a)⁻¹ * aI := by
obtain ⟨a_inv, nonzero, ha⟩ := I.isFractional
have nonzero := mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp nonzero
have map_a_nonzero : algebraMap R₁ K a_inv ≠ 0 :=
mt IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp nonzero
refine
⟨a_inv,
Submodule.comap (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) ↑(spanSingleton R₁⁰ (algebraMap R₁ K a_inv) * I),
nonzero, ext fun x => Iff.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ mem_singleton_mul.symm⟩
· intro hx
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ := ha x hx
rw [Algebra.smul_def] at hx'
refine ⟨algebraMap R₁ K x', (mem_coeIdeal _).mpr ⟨x', mem_singleton_mul.mpr ?_, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· exact ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· rw [hx', ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ map_a_nonzero, one_mul]
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy
obtain ⟨y', hy', hx'⟩ := mem_singleton_mul.mp hx'
rw [Algebra.linearMap_apply] at hx'
rwa [hx', ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ map_a_nonzero, one_mul]
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `J` is nonzero. -/
theorem ideal_factor_ne_zero {R} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R} {J : Ideal R}
(haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) : J ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [h, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, coeIdeal_bot, MulZeroClass.mul_zero] at haJ
exact hI haJ
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `a` is nonzero. -/
theorem constant_factor_ne_zero {R} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R} {J : Ideal R}
(haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
(Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h
rw [h, RingHom.map_zero, inv_zero, spanSingleton_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul] at haJ
exact hI haJ
instance isPrincipal {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [Algebra R K]
[IsFractionRing R K] (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : (I : Submodule R K).IsPrincipal := by
obtain ⟨a, aI, -, ha⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
use (algebraMap R K a)⁻¹ * algebraMap R K (generator aI)
suffices I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K a)⁻¹ * algebraMap R K (generator aI)) by
rw [spanSingleton] at this
exact congr_arg Subtype.val this
conv_lhs => rw [ha, ← span_singleton_generator aI]
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, coeIdeal_span_singleton (generator aI),
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
theorem le_spanSingleton_mul_iff {x : P} {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} :
I ≤ spanSingleton S x * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ spanSingleton _ x * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
| simp only [mem_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_le_iff {x : P} {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton _ x * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_singleton_mul, mem_spanSingleton]
constructor
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 795 | 800 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Patrick Stevens
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Sums of binomial coefficients
This file includes variants of the binomial theorem and other results on sums of binomial
coefficients. Theorems whose proofs depend on such sums may also go in this file for import
reasons.
-/
open Nat Finset
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Commute
variable [Semiring R] {x y : R}
/-- A version of the **binomial theorem** for commuting elements in noncommutative semirings. -/
theorem add_pow (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m := by
let t : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun n m ↦ x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m
change (x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), t n m
have h_first : ∀ n, t n 0 = y ^ n := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_zero_right, pow_zero, cast_one, mul_one, one_mul, tsub_zero]
have h_last : ∀ n, t n n.succ = 0 := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero]
have h_middle :
∀ n i : ℕ, i ∈ range n.succ → (t n.succ i.succ) = x * t n i + y * t n i.succ := by
intro n i h_mem
have h_le : i ≤ n := le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.mp h_mem)
dsimp only [t]
rw [choose_succ_succ, cast_add, mul_add]
congr 1
· rw [pow_succ' x, succ_sub_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_assoc y, ← mul_assoc y, (h.symm.pow_right i.succ).eq]
by_cases h_eq : i = n
· rw [h_eq, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [succ_sub (lt_of_le_of_ne h_le h_eq)]
rw [pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, sum_range_succ, range_zero, sum_empty, zero_add]
dsimp only [t]
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, choose_self, cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [sum_range_succ', h_first, sum_congr rfl (h_middle n), sum_add_distrib, add_assoc,
pow_succ' (x + y), ih, add_mul, mul_sum, mul_sum]
congr 1
rw [sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ, h_first, h_last, mul_zero, add_zero, _root_.pow_succ']
/-- A version of `Commute.add_pow` that avoids ℕ-subtraction by summing over the antidiagonal and
also with the binomial coefficient applied via scalar action of ℕ. -/
theorem add_pow' (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ antidiagonal n, n.choose m.1 • (x ^ m.1 * y ^ m.2) := by
simp_rw [Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun m p ↦ n.choose m • (x ^ m * y ^ p),
nsmul_eq_mul, cast_comm, h.add_pow]
end Commute
/-- The **binomial theorem** -/
theorem add_pow [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m :=
(Commute.all x y).add_pow n
/-- A special case of the **binomial theorem** -/
theorem sub_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(x - y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), (-1) ^ (m + n) * x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_pow]
congr! 1 with m hm
have : (-1 : R) ^ (n - m) = (-1) ^ (n + m) := by
rw [mem_range] at hm
simp [show n + m = n - m + 2 * m by omega, pow_add]
rw [neg_pow, this]
ring
namespace Nat
| /-- The sum of entries in a row of Pascal's triangle -/
theorem sum_range_choose (n : ℕ) : (∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), n.choose m) = 2 ^ n := by
have := (add_pow 1 1 n).symm
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Sum.lean | 89 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.Shift
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.TotalComplex
/-!
# Behaviour of the total complex with respect to shifts
There are two ways to shift objects in `HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ)`:
* by shifting the first indices (and changing signs of horizontal differentials),
which corresponds to the shift by `ℤ` on `CochainComplex (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ`.
* by shifting the second indices (and changing signs of vertical differentials).
These two sorts of shift functors shall be abbreviated as
`HomologicalComplex₂.shiftFunctor₁ C x` and
`HomologicalComplex₂.shiftFunctor₂ C y`.
In this file, for any `K : HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ)`, we define an isomorphism
`K.totalShift₁Iso x : ((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦x⟧`
for any `x : ℤ` (which does not involve signs) and an isomorphism
`K.totalShift₂Iso y : ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦y⟧`
for any `y : ℤ` (which is given by the multiplication by `(p * y).negOnePow` on the
summand in bidegree `(p, q)` of `K`).
Depending on the order of the "composition" of the two isomorphisms
`totalShift₁Iso` and `totalShift₂Iso`, we get
two ways to identify `((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K)).total (up ℤ)`
and `(K.total (up ℤ))⟦x + y⟧`. The lemma `totalShift₁Iso_trans_totalShift₂Iso` shows that
these two compositions of isomorphisms differ by the sign `(x * y).negOnePow`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category ComplexShape Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex₂
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C]
/-- The shift on bicomplexes obtained by shifting the first indices (and changing the
sign of differentials). -/
abbrev shiftFunctor₁ (x : ℤ) :
HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ) ⥤ HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ) :=
shiftFunctor _ x
/-- The shift on bicomplexes obtained by shifting the second indices (and changing the
sign of differentials). -/
abbrev shiftFunctor₂ (y : ℤ) :
HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ) ⥤ HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ) :=
(shiftFunctor _ y).mapHomologicalComplex _
variable {C}
variable (K L : HomologicalComplex₂ C (up ℤ) (up ℤ)) (f : K ⟶ L)
/-- The isomorphism `(((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).X a).X b ≅ (K.X a').X b` when `a' = a + x`. -/
def shiftFunctor₁XXIso (a x a' : ℤ) (h : a' = a + x) (b : ℤ) :
(((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).X a).X b ≅ (K.X a').X b := eqToIso (by subst h; rfl)
/-- The isomorphism `(((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).X a).X b ≅ (K.X a).X b'` when `b' = b + y`. -/
def shiftFunctor₂XXIso (a b y b' : ℤ) (h : b' = b + y) :
(((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).X a).X b ≅ (K.X a).X b' := eqToIso (by subst h; rfl)
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor₁XXIso_refl (a b x : ℤ) :
K.shiftFunctor₁XXIso a x (a + x) rfl b = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor₂XXIso_refl (a b y : ℤ) :
K.shiftFunctor₂XXIso a b y (b + y) rfl = Iso.refl _ := rfl
variable (x y : ℤ) [K.HasTotal (up ℤ)]
instance : ((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).HasTotal (up ℤ) := fun n =>
hasCoproduct_of_equiv_of_iso (K.toGradedObject.mapObjFun (π (up ℤ) (up ℤ) (up ℤ)) (n + x)) _
{ toFun := fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a + x, b⟩, by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, instTotalComplexShape_π, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at h ⊢
omega⟩
invFun := fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ => ⟨(a - x, b), by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, instTotalComplexShape_π, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at h ⊢
omega⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩
ext
· dsimp
omega
· rfl
right_inv := by
intro ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩
ext
· dsimp
omega
· rfl }
(fun _ => Iso.refl _)
instance : ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).HasTotal (up ℤ) := fun n =>
hasCoproduct_of_equiv_of_iso (K.toGradedObject.mapObjFun (π (up ℤ) (up ℤ) (up ℤ)) (n + y)) _
{ toFun := fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a, b + y⟩, by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, instTotalComplexShape_π, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at h ⊢
omega⟩
invFun := fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ => ⟨(a, b - y), by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, instTotalComplexShape_π, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at h ⊢
omega⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp }
(fun _ => Iso.refl _)
instance : ((shiftFunctor₂ C y ⋙ shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).HasTotal (up ℤ) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
instance : ((shiftFunctor₁ C x ⋙ shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).HasTotal (up ℤ) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- Auxiliary definition for `totalShift₁Iso`. -/
noncomputable def totalShift₁XIso (n n' : ℤ) (h : n + x = n') :
(((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).total (up ℤ)).X n ≅ (K.total (up ℤ)).X n' where
hom := totalDesc _ (fun p q hpq => K.ιTotal (up ℤ) (p + x) q n' (by dsimp at hpq ⊢; omega))
inv := totalDesc _ (fun p q hpq =>
(K.XXIsoOfEq _ _ _ (Int.sub_add_cancel p x) rfl).inv ≫
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).ιTotal (up ℤ) (p - x) q n
(by dsimp at hpq ⊢; omega))
hom_inv_id := by
ext p q h
dsimp
simp only [ι_totalDesc_assoc, CochainComplex.shiftFunctor_obj_X', ι_totalDesc, comp_id]
exact ((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).XXIsoOfEq_inv_ιTotal _ (by omega) rfl _ _
inv_hom_id := by
ext
dsimp
simp only [ι_totalDesc_assoc, Category.assoc, ι_totalDesc, XXIsoOfEq_inv_ιTotal, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma D₁_totalShift₁XIso_hom (n₀ n₁ n₀' n₁' : ℤ) (h₀ : n₀ + x = n₀') (h₁ : n₁ + x = n₁') :
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).D₁ (up ℤ) n₀ n₁ ≫ (K.totalShift₁XIso x n₁ n₁' h₁).hom =
x.negOnePow • ((K.totalShift₁XIso x n₀ n₀' h₀).hom ≫ K.D₁ (up ℤ) n₀' n₁') := by
by_cases h : (up ℤ).Rel n₀ n₁
· apply total.hom_ext
intro p q hpq
dsimp at h hpq
dsimp [totalShift₁XIso]
rw [ι_D₁_assoc, Linear.comp_units_smul, ι_totalDesc_assoc, ι_D₁,
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).d₁_eq _ rfl _ _ (by dsimp; omega),
K.d₁_eq _ (show p + x + 1 = p + 1 + x by omega) _ _ (by dsimp; omega)]
dsimp
rw [one_smul, Category.assoc, ι_totalDesc, one_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp]
· rw [D₁_shape _ _ _ _ h, zero_comp, D₁_shape, comp_zero, smul_zero]
intro h'
apply h
dsimp at h' ⊢
omega
@[reassoc]
lemma D₂_totalShift₁XIso_hom (n₀ n₁ n₀' n₁' : ℤ) (h₀ : n₀ + x = n₀') (h₁ : n₁ + x = n₁') :
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).D₂ (up ℤ) n₀ n₁ ≫ (K.totalShift₁XIso x n₁ n₁' h₁).hom =
x.negOnePow • ((K.totalShift₁XIso x n₀ n₀' h₀).hom ≫ K.D₂ (up ℤ) n₀' n₁') := by
by_cases h : (up ℤ).Rel n₀ n₁
· apply total.hom_ext
intro p q hpq
dsimp at h hpq
dsimp [totalShift₁XIso]
rw [ι_D₂_assoc, Linear.comp_units_smul, ι_totalDesc_assoc, ι_D₂,
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).d₂_eq _ _ rfl _ (by dsimp; omega),
K.d₂_eq _ _ rfl _ (by dsimp; omega), smul_smul,
Linear.units_smul_comp, Category.assoc, ι_totalDesc]
dsimp
congr 1
rw [add_comm p, Int.negOnePow_add, ← mul_assoc, Int.units_mul_self, one_mul]
· rw [D₂_shape _ _ _ _ h, zero_comp, D₂_shape, comp_zero, smul_zero]
intro h'
apply h
dsimp at h' ⊢
omega
/-- The isomorphism `((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦x⟧`
expressing the compatibility of the total complex with the shift on the first indices.
This isomorphism does not involve signs. -/
noncomputable def totalShift₁Iso :
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦x⟧ :=
HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents (fun n => K.totalShift₁XIso x n (n + x) rfl)
(fun n n' _ => by
dsimp
simp only [total_d, Preadditive.add_comp, Preadditive.comp_add, smul_add,
Linear.comp_units_smul, K.D₁_totalShift₁XIso_hom x n n' _ _ rfl rfl,
K.D₂_totalShift₁XIso_hom x n n' _ _ rfl rfl])
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_totalShift₁Iso_hom_f (a b n : ℤ) (h : a + b = n) (a' : ℤ) (ha' : a' = a + x)
(n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' = n + x) :
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).ιTotal (up ℤ) a b n h ≫ (K.totalShift₁Iso x).hom.f n =
(K.shiftFunctor₁XXIso a x a' ha' b).hom ≫ K.ιTotal (up ℤ) a' b n' (by dsimp; omega) ≫
(CochainComplex.shiftFunctorObjXIso (K.total (up ℤ)) x n n' hn').inv := by
subst ha' hn'
dsimp [totalShift₁Iso, totalShift₁XIso]
simp only [ι_totalDesc, comp_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_totalShift₁Iso_inv_f (a b n : ℤ) (h : a + b = n) (a' n' : ℤ)
(ha' : a' + b = n') (hn' : n' = n + x) :
K.ιTotal (up ℤ) a' b n' ha' ≫
(CochainComplex.shiftFunctorObjXIso (K.total (up ℤ)) x n n' hn').inv ≫
(K.totalShift₁Iso x).inv.f n =
(K.shiftFunctor₁XXIso a x a' (by omega) b).inv ≫
((shiftFunctor₁ C x).obj K).ιTotal (up ℤ) a b n h := by
subst hn'
obtain rfl : a = a' - x := by omega
dsimp [totalShift₁Iso, totalShift₁XIso, shiftFunctor₁XXIso, XXIsoOfEq]
simp only [id_comp, ι_totalDesc]
variable {K L} in
@[reassoc]
lemma totalShift₁Iso_hom_naturality [L.HasTotal (up ℤ)] :
total.map ((shiftFunctor₁ C x).map f) (up ℤ) ≫ (L.totalShift₁Iso x).hom =
(K.totalShift₁Iso x).hom ≫ (total.map f (up ℤ))⟦x⟧' := by
ext n i₁ i₂ h
dsimp at h ⊢
rw [ιTotal_map_assoc, L.ι_totalShift₁Iso_hom_f x i₁ i₂ n h _ rfl _ rfl,
K.ι_totalShift₁Iso_hom_f_assoc x i₁ i₂ n h _ rfl _ rfl]
dsimp
rw [id_comp, id_comp, id_comp, comp_id, ιTotal_map]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `totalShift₂Iso`. -/
noncomputable def totalShift₂XIso (n n' : ℤ) (h : n + y = n') :
(((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).total (up ℤ)).X n ≅ (K.total (up ℤ)).X n' where
hom := totalDesc _ (fun p q hpq => (p * y).negOnePow • K.ιTotal (up ℤ) p (q + y) n'
(by dsimp at hpq ⊢; omega))
inv := totalDesc _ (fun p q hpq => (p * y).negOnePow •
(K.XXIsoOfEq _ _ _ rfl (Int.sub_add_cancel q y)).inv ≫
((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).ιTotal (up ℤ) p (q - y) n (by dsimp at hpq ⊢; omega))
hom_inv_id := by
ext p q h
dsimp
simp only [ι_totalDesc_assoc, Linear.units_smul_comp, ι_totalDesc, smul_smul,
Int.units_mul_self, one_smul, comp_id]
exact ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).XXIsoOfEq_inv_ιTotal _ rfl (by omega) _ _
inv_hom_id := by
ext
dsimp
simp only [ι_totalDesc_assoc, Linear.units_smul_comp, Category.assoc, ι_totalDesc,
Linear.comp_units_smul, XXIsoOfEq_inv_ιTotal, smul_smul, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul,
comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma D₁_totalShift₂XIso_hom (n₀ n₁ n₀' n₁' : ℤ) (h₀ : n₀ + y = n₀') (h₁ : n₁ + y = n₁') :
((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).D₁ (up ℤ) n₀ n₁ ≫ (K.totalShift₂XIso y n₁ n₁' h₁).hom =
y.negOnePow • ((K.totalShift₂XIso y n₀ n₀' h₀).hom ≫ K.D₁ (up ℤ) n₀' n₁') := by
by_cases h : (up ℤ).Rel n₀ n₁
· apply total.hom_ext
intro p q hpq
dsimp at h hpq
dsimp [totalShift₂XIso]
rw [ι_D₁_assoc, Linear.comp_units_smul, ι_totalDesc_assoc, Linear.units_smul_comp,
ι_D₁, smul_smul, ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).d₁_eq _ rfl _ _ (by dsimp; omega),
K.d₁_eq _ rfl _ _ (by dsimp; omega)]
dsimp
rw [one_smul, one_smul, Category.assoc, ι_totalDesc, Linear.comp_units_smul,
← Int.negOnePow_add]
congr 2
linarith
· rw [D₁_shape _ _ _ _ h, zero_comp, D₁_shape, comp_zero, smul_zero]
intro h'
apply h
dsimp at h' ⊢
omega
@[reassoc]
lemma D₂_totalShift₂XIso_hom (n₀ n₁ n₀' n₁' : ℤ) (h₀ : n₀ + y = n₀') (h₁ : n₁ + y = n₁') :
((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).D₂ (up ℤ) n₀ n₁ ≫ (K.totalShift₂XIso y n₁ n₁' h₁).hom =
y.negOnePow • ((K.totalShift₂XIso y n₀ n₀' h₀).hom ≫ K.D₂ (up ℤ) n₀' n₁') := by
by_cases h : (up ℤ).Rel n₀ n₁
· apply total.hom_ext
intro p q hpq
dsimp at h hpq
dsimp [totalShift₂XIso]
rw [ι_D₂_assoc, Linear.comp_units_smul, ι_totalDesc_assoc, Linear.units_smul_comp,
smul_smul, ι_D₂, ((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).d₂_eq _ _ rfl _ (by dsimp; omega),
K.d₂_eq _ _ (show q + y + 1 = q + 1 + y by omega) _ (by dsimp; omega),
Linear.units_smul_comp, Category.assoc, smul_smul, ι_totalDesc]
dsimp
rw [Linear.units_smul_comp, Linear.comp_units_smul, smul_smul, smul_smul,
← Int.negOnePow_add, ← Int.negOnePow_add, ← Int.negOnePow_add,
← Int.negOnePow_add]
congr 2
omega
· rw [D₂_shape _ _ _ _ h, zero_comp, D₂_shape, comp_zero, smul_zero]
intro h'
apply h
dsimp at h' ⊢
omega
/-- The isomorphism `((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦y⟧`
expressing the compatibility of the total complex with the shift on the second indices.
This isomorphism involves signs: on the summand in degree `(p, q)` of `K`, it is given by the
multiplication by `(p * y).negOnePow`. -/
noncomputable def totalShift₂Iso :
((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).total (up ℤ) ≅ (K.total (up ℤ))⟦y⟧ :=
HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents (fun n => K.totalShift₂XIso y n (n + y) rfl)
(fun n n' _ => by
dsimp
simp only [total_d, Preadditive.add_comp, Preadditive.comp_add, smul_add,
Linear.comp_units_smul, K.D₁_totalShift₂XIso_hom y n n' _ _ rfl rfl,
K.D₂_totalShift₂XIso_hom y n n' _ _ rfl rfl])
|
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_totalShift₂Iso_hom_f (a b n : ℤ) (h : a + b = n) (b' : ℤ) (hb' : b' = b + y)
(n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' = n + y) :
((shiftFunctor₂ C y).obj K).ιTotal (up ℤ) a b n h ≫ (K.totalShift₂Iso y).hom.f n =
(a * y).negOnePow • (K.shiftFunctor₂XXIso a b y b' hb').hom ≫
K.ιTotal (up ℤ) a b' n' (by dsimp; omega) ≫
(CochainComplex.shiftFunctorObjXIso (K.total (up ℤ)) y n n' hn').inv := by
subst hb' hn'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/TotalComplexShift.lean | 307 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Alena Gusakov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller, Pim Otte
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.WalkCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DegreeSum
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
/-!
# Matchings
A *matching* for a simple graph is a set of disjoint pairs of adjacent vertices, and the set of all
the vertices in a matching is called its *support* (and sometimes the vertices in the support are
said to be *saturated* by the matching). A *perfect matching* is a matching whose support contains
every vertex of the graph.
In this module, we represent a matching as a subgraph whose vertices are each incident to at most
one edge, and the edges of the subgraph represent the paired vertices.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching`: `M.IsMatching` means that `M` is a matching of its
underlying graph.
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsPerfectMatching` defines when a subgraph `M` of a simple graph is a
perfect matching, denoted `M.IsPerfectMatching`.
* `SimpleGraph.IsMatchingFree` means that a graph `G` has no perfect matchings.
* `SimpleGraph.IsCycles` means that a graph consists of cycles (including cycles of length 0,
also known as isolated vertices)
* `SimpleGraph.IsAlternating` means that edges in a graph `G` are alternatingly
included and not included in some other graph `G'`
## TODO
* Define an `other` function and prove useful results about it (https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/252551-graph-theory/topic/matchings/near/266205863)
* Provide a bicoloring for matchings (https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/252551-graph-theory/topic/matchings/near/265495120)
* Tutte's Theorem
* Hall's Marriage Theorem (see `Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Basic`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field TwoSidedIdeal
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W : Type*} {G G' : SimpleGraph V} {M M' : Subgraph G} {u v w : V}
namespace Subgraph
/--
The subgraph `M` of `G` is a matching if every vertex of `M` is incident to exactly one edge in `M`.
We say that the vertices in `M.support` are *matched* or *saturated*.
-/
def IsMatching (M : Subgraph G) : Prop := ∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ M.verts → ∃! w, M.Adj v w
/-- Given a vertex, returns the unique edge of the matching it is incident to. -/
noncomputable def IsMatching.toEdge (h : M.IsMatching) (v : M.verts) : M.edgeSet :=
⟨s(v, (h v.property).choose), (h v.property).choose_spec.1⟩
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_of_adj (h : M.IsMatching) (hv : v ∈ M.verts) (hvw : M.Adj v w) :
h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = ⟨s(v, w), hvw⟩ := by
simp only [IsMatching.toEdge, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
congr
exact ((h (M.edge_vert hvw)).choose_spec.2 w hvw).symm
theorem IsMatching.toEdge.surjective (h : M.IsMatching) : Surjective h.toEdge := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, he⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, M.edge_vert he⟩, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj _ he⟩
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_toEdge_of_adj (h : M.IsMatching)
(hv : v ∈ M.verts) (hw : w ∈ M.verts) (ha : M.Adj v w) :
h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = h.toEdge ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
rw [h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hv ha, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hw (M.symm ha), Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Sym2.eq_swap]
lemma IsMatching.map_ofLE (h : M.IsMatching) (hGG' : G ≤ G') :
(M.map (Hom.ofLE hGG')).IsMatching := by
intro _ hv
obtain ⟨_, hv, hv'⟩ := Set.mem_image _ _ _ |>.mp hv
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := h hv
use w
simpa using hv' ▸ hw
lemma IsMatching.eq_of_adj_left (hM : M.IsMatching) (huv : M.Adj u v) (huw : M.Adj u w) : v = w :=
(hM <| M.edge_vert huv).unique huv huw
lemma IsMatching.eq_of_adj_right (hM : M.IsMatching) (huw : M.Adj u w) (hvw : M.Adj v w) : u = v :=
hM.eq_of_adj_left huw.symm hvw.symm
lemma IsMatching.not_adj_left_of_ne (hM : M.IsMatching) (hvw : v ≠ w) (huv : M.Adj u v) :
¬M.Adj u w := fun huw ↦ hvw <| hM.eq_of_adj_left huv huw
lemma IsMatching.not_adj_right_of_ne (hM : M.IsMatching) (huv : u ≠ v) (huw : M.Adj u w) :
¬M.Adj v w := fun hvw ↦ huv <| hM.eq_of_adj_right huw hvw
lemma IsMatching.sup (hM : M.IsMatching) (hM' : M'.IsMatching)
(hd : Disjoint M.support M'.support) : (M ⊔ M').IsMatching := by
intro v hv
have aux {N N' : Subgraph G} (hN : N.IsMatching) (hd : Disjoint N.support N'.support)
(hmN: v ∈ N.verts) : ∃! w, (N ⊔ N').Adj v w := by
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := hN hmN
use w
| refine ⟨sup_adj.mpr (.inl hw.1), ?_⟩
intro y hy
cases hy with
| inl h => exact hw.2 y h
| inr h =>
rw [Set.disjoint_left] at hd
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Matching.lean | 114 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Absolute values in linear ordered rings.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_zpow (n : ℤ) (a : α) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ |n| := by
obtain n0 | n0 := le_total 0 n
· obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le n0
simp only [mabs_pow, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
· obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (neg_nonneg.2 n0)
rw [← mabs_inv, ← zpow_neg, ← abs_neg, h, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, zpow_natCast]
exact mabs_pow m _
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
lemma odd_abs [LinearOrder α] [Ring α] {a : α} : Odd (abs a) ↔ Odd a := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, odd_neg]
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma abs_one : |(1 : α)| = 1 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_one
lemma abs_two : |(2 : α)| = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma abs_mul (a b : α) : |a * b| = |a| * |b| := by
rw [abs_eq (mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b))]
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha <;> rcases le_total b 0 with hb | hb <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, true_or, or_true, eq_self_iff_true, neg_mul,
mul_neg, neg_neg, *]
/-- `abs` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
def absHom : α →*₀ α where
toFun := abs
map_zero' := abs_zero
map_one' := abs_one
map_mul' := abs_mul
@[simp]
lemma abs_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a ^ n| = |a| ^ n := (absHom.toMonoidHom : α →* α).map_pow _ _
lemma pow_abs (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a| ^ n = |a ^ n| := (abs_pow a n).symm
lemma Even.pow_abs (hn : Even n) (a : α) : |a| ^ n = a ^ n := by
rw [← abs_pow, abs_eq_self]; exact hn.pow_nonneg _
lemma abs_neg_one_pow (n : ℕ) : |(-1 : α) ^ n| = 1 := by rw [← pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
lemma abs_pow_eq_one (a : α) (h : n ≠ 0) : |a ^ n| = 1 ↔ |a| = 1 := by
convert pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) zero_le_one h
exacts [(pow_abs _ _).symm, (one_pow _).symm]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma abs_mul_abs_self (a : α) : |a| * |a| = a * a :=
abs_by_cases (fun x => x * x = a * a) rfl (neg_mul_neg a a)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_self (a : α) : |a * a| = a * a := by rw [abs_mul, abs_mul_abs_self]
lemma abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq : |a| = |b| ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact (mul_self_inj (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)).symm
lemma abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt : |a| < |b| ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_iff_mul_self_le : |a| ≤ |b| ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one : |a| ≤ 1 ↔ a * a ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [abs_one, one_mul] using abs_le_iff_mul_self_le (a := a) (b := 1)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma sq_abs (a : α) : |a| ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_abs_self a
lemma abs_sq (x : α) : |x ^ 2| = x ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_self x
lemma sq_lt_sq : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 ↔ |a| < |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_lt_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_lt_sq' (h1 : -b < a) (h2 : a < b) : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
sq_lt_sq.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (abs_lt.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma sq_le_sq : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 ↔ |a| ≤ |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_le_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_le_sq' (h1 : -b ≤ a) (h2 : a ≤ b) : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (le_trans (abs_le.mpr ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| < b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_lt_sq]
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b < a ∧ a < b :=
abs_lt.1 <| abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| ≤ b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_le_sq]
theorem le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_abs_self a |>.trans <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq' (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b :=
abs_le.1 <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs (a b : α) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ |a| = |b| := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, sq_le_sq]
@[simp] lemma sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 ≤ 1 ↔ |a| ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma sq_lt_one_iff_abs_lt_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 < 1 ↔ |a| < 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs (a : α) : 1 ≤ a ^ 2 ↔ 1 ≤ |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
@[simp] lemma one_lt_sq_iff_one_lt_abs (a : α) : 1 < a ^ 2 ↔ 1 < |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
lemma exists_abs_lt {α : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(a : α) : ∃ b > 0, |a| < b :=
⟨|a| + 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one <| by simp, lt_add_one |a|⟩
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
theorem abs_sub_sq (a b : α) : |a - b| * |a - b| = a * a + b * b - (1 + 1) * a * b := by
rw [abs_mul_abs_self]
simp only [mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_one, mul_neg,
neg_add_rev, neg_neg, add_assoc]
lemma abs_unit_intCast (a : ℤˣ) : |((a : ℤ) : α)| = 1 := by
cases Int.units_eq_one_or a <;> simp_all
private def geomSum : ℕ → α
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => a * geomSum n + b ^ (n + 1)
private theorem abs_geomSum_le : |geomSum a b n| ≤ (n + 1) * max |a| |b| ^ n := by
induction n with | zero => simp [geomSum] | succ n ih => ?_
refine (abs_add_le ..).trans ?_
rw [abs_mul, abs_pow, Nat.cast_succ, add_one_mul]
refine add_le_add ?_ (pow_le_pow_left₀ (abs_nonneg _) le_sup_right _)
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm |a|]
exact mul_le_mul ih le_sup_left (abs_nonneg _) (mul_nonneg
(@Nat.cast_succ α .. ▸ Nat.cast_nonneg _) <| pow_nonneg ((abs_nonneg _).trans le_sup_left) _)
omit [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
private theorem pow_sub_pow_eq_sub_mul_geomSum :
a ^ (n + 1) - b ^ (n + 1) = (a - b) * geomSum a b n := by
induction n with | zero => simp [geomSum] | succ n ih => ?_
rw [geomSum, mul_add, mul_comm a, ← mul_assoc, ← ih,
sub_mul, sub_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ', mul_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem abs_pow_sub_pow_le : |a ^ n - b ^ n| ≤ |a - b| * n * max |a| |b| ^ (n - 1) := by
obtain _ | n := n; · simp
rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel, pow_sub_pow_eq_sub_mul_geomSum, abs_mul, mul_assoc, Nat.cast_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_geomSum_le ..) (abs_nonneg _)
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem abs_dvd (a b : α) : |a| ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, neg_dvd]
theorem abs_dvd_self (a : α) : |a| ∣ a :=
(abs_dvd a a).mpr (dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem dvd_abs (a b : α) : a ∣ |b| ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases abs_choice b with h | h <;> simp only [h, dvd_neg]
theorem self_dvd_abs (a : α) : a ∣ |a| :=
(dvd_abs a a).mpr (dvd_refl a)
theorem abs_dvd_abs (a b : α) : |a| ∣ |b| ↔ a ∣ b :=
(abs_dvd _ _).trans (dvd_abs _ _)
end
open Nat
section LinearOrderedRing
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n :=
match n.even_xor_odd with
| .inl hne => by simp only [*, and_true, ← abs_eq_abs,
← pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b) hn, hne.1.pow_abs]
| .inr hn => by simp [hn, (hn.1.strictMono_pow (R := R)).injective.eq_iff]
| lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_cases : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn <;> simp [pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero, *]
lemma pow_eq_one_iff_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ∧ Even n := by
simp [← pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero hn]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Abs.lean | 220 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
| refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 686 | 689 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Indexed product measures
In this file we define and prove properties about finite products of measures
(and at some point, countable products of measures).
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`: The product of finitely many σ-finite measures.
Given `μ : (i : ι) → Measure (α i)` for `[Fintype ι]` it has type `Measure ((i : ι) → α i)`.
To apply Fubini's theorem or Tonelli's theorem along some subset, we recommend using the marginal
construction `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` and (todo) `MeasureTheory.marginal`. This allows you to
apply the theorems without any bookkeeping with measurable equivalences.
## Implementation Notes
We define `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`, the product of finitely many outer measures, as the
maximal outer measure `n` with the property that `n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`,
where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets `{s i | i : ι}`.
We then show that this induces a product of measures, called `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
For a collection of σ-finite measures `μ` and a collection of measurable sets `s` we show that
`Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i)`. To do this, we follow the following steps:
* We know that there is some ordering on `ι`, given by an element of `[Countable ι]`.
* Using this, we have an equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd` between
`∀ ι, α i` and an iterated product of `α i`, called `List.tprod α l` for some list `l`.
* On this iterated product we can easily define a product measure `MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod`
by iterating `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`
* Using the previous two steps we construct `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` on `(i : ι) → α i` for
countable `ι`.
* We know that `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` sends products of sets to products of measures, and
since `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` is the maximal such measure (or at least, it comes from an outer
measure which is the maximal such outer measure), we get the same rule for
`MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
## Tags
finitary product measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure Filter MeasurableSpace Encodable
open scoped Topology ENNReal
universe u v
variable {ι ι' : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [Fintype ι] {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)}
/-- An upper bound for the measure in a finite product space.
It is defined to by taking the image of the set under all projections, and taking the product
of the measures of these images.
For measurable boxes it is equal to the correct measure. -/
@[simp]
def piPremeasure (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : Set (∀ i, α i)) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∏ i, m i (eval i '' s)
theorem piPremeasure_pi {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (hs : (pi univ s).Nonempty) :
piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by simp [hs, piPremeasure]
theorem piPremeasure_pi' {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} : piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [piPremeasure]
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· rcases univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩
have : ∃ i, m i (s i) = 0 := ⟨i, by simp [hi]⟩
simpa [h, Finset.card_univ, zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero, @eq_comm _ (0 : ℝ≥0∞),
Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, piPremeasure]
· simp [h, piPremeasure]
theorem piPremeasure_pi_mono {s t : Set (∀ i, α i)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
piPremeasure m s ≤ piPremeasure m t :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => measure_mono (image_subset _ h)
theorem piPremeasure_pi_eval {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
piPremeasure m (pi univ fun i => eval i '' s) = piPremeasure m s := by
simp only [eval, piPremeasure_pi']; rfl
namespace OuterMeasure
/-- `OuterMeasure.pi m` is the finite product of the outer measures `{m i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be the maximal outer measure `n` with the property that
`n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`, where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets
`{s i | i : ι}`. -/
protected def pi (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i) :=
boundedBy (piPremeasure m)
theorem pi_pi_le (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
OuterMeasure.pi m (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
exact (boundedBy_le _).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi h)
theorem le_pi {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)} {n : OuterMeasure (∀ i, α i)} :
n ≤ OuterMeasure.pi m ↔
∀ s : ∀ i, Set (α i), (pi univ s).Nonempty → n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.pi, le_boundedBy']; constructor
· intro h s hs; refine (h _ hs).trans_eq (piPremeasure_pi hs)
· intro h s hs; refine le_trans (n.mono <| subset_pi_eval_image univ s) (h _ ?_)
simp [univ_pi_nonempty_iff, hs]
end OuterMeasure
namespace Measure
variable [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (μ : ∀ i, Measure (α i))
section Tprod
open List
variable {δ : Type*} {X : δ → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (X i)]
-- for some reason the equation compiler doesn't like this definition
/-- A product of measures in `tprod α l`. -/
protected def tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) : Measure (TProd X l) := by
induction' l with i l ih
· exact dirac PUnit.unit
· exact (μ i).prod (α := X i) ih
@[simp]
theorem tprod_nil (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) : Measure.tprod [] μ = dirac PUnit.unit :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tprod_cons (i : δ) (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) :
Measure.tprod (i :: l) μ = (μ i).prod (Measure.tprod l μ) :=
rfl
instance sigmaFinite_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] :
SigmaFinite (Measure.tprod l μ) := by
induction l with
| nil => rw [tprod_nil]; infer_instance
| cons i l ih => rw [tprod_cons]; exact @prod.instSigmaFinite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih
theorem tprod_tprod (l : List δ) (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (X i)) :
Measure.tprod l μ (Set.tprod l s) = (l.map fun i => (μ i) (s i)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [tprod_cons, Set.tprod]
dsimp only [foldr_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
rw [prod_prod, ih]
end Tprod
section Encodable
open List MeasurableEquiv
variable [Encodable ι]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The product measure on an encodable finite type, defined by mapping `Measure.tprod` along the
equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd`.
The definition `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` should be used instead of this one. -/
def pi' : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
Measure.map (TProd.elim' mem_sortedUniv) (Measure.tprod (sortedUniv ι) μ)
theorem pi'_pi [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi' μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, μ i (s i) := by
classical
rw [pi']
rw [← MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, MeasurableEquiv.map_apply,
MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd_symm_apply, elim_preimage_pi, tprod_tprod _ μ, ←
List.prod_toFinset, sortedUniv_toFinset] <;>
exact sortedUniv_nodup ι
end Encodable
theorem pi_caratheodory :
MeasurableSpace.pi ≤ (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure).caratheodory := by
refine iSup_le ?_
intro i s hs
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
apply boundedBy_caratheodory
intro t
simp_rw [piPremeasure]
refine Finset.prod_add_prod_le' (Finset.mem_univ i) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp [image_inter_preimage, image_diff_preimage, measure_inter_add_diff _ hs, le_refl]
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
· rintro j - _; gcongr; apply diff_subset
|
/-- `Measure.pi μ` is the finite product of the measures `{μ i | i : ι}`.
It is defined to be measure corresponding to `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`. -/
protected irreducible_def pi : Measure (∀ i, α i) :=
toMeasure (OuterMeasure.pi fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) (pi_caratheodory μ)
instance _root_.MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.pi {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MeasureSpace (α i)] :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Pi.lean | 204 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Matrices as a normed space
In this file we provide the following non-instances for norms on matrices:
* The elementwise norm:
* `Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.normedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.normedSpace`
* `Matrix.isBoundedSMul`
* The Frobenius norm:
* `Matrix.frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedSpace`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedRing`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedAlgebra`
* `Matrix.frobeniusIsBoundedSMul`
* The $L^\infty$ operator norm:
* `Matrix.linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedSpace`
* `Matrix.linftyOpIsBoundedSMul`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpSemiNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedAlgebra`
These are not declared as instances because there are several natural choices for defining the norm
of a matrix.
The norm induced by the identification of `Matrix m n 𝕜` with
`EuclideanSpace n 𝕜 →L[𝕜] EuclideanSpace m 𝕜` (i.e., the ℓ² operator norm) can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Matrix`. It is separated to avoid extraneous imports in this file.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {R l m n α β ι : Type*} [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [Unique ι]
/-! ### The elementwise supremum norm -/
section LinfLinf
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Seminormed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def seminormedAddCommGroup : SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.seminormedAddCommGroup
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
theorem norm_def (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖A‖ = ‖fun i j => A i j‖ := rfl
/-- The norm of a matrix is the sup of the sup of the nnnorm of the entries -/
lemma norm_eq_sup_sup_nnnorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = Finset.sup Finset.univ fun i ↦ Finset.sup Finset.univ fun j ↦ ‖A i j‖₊ := by
simp_rw [Matrix.norm_def, Pi.norm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
theorem nnnorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖A‖₊ = ‖fun i j => A i j‖₊ := rfl
theorem norm_le_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖ ≤ r := by
simp_rw [norm_def, pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg hr]
theorem nnnorm_le_iff {r : ℝ≥0} {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖₊ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖₊ ≤ r := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, pi_nnnorm_le_iff]
theorem norm_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖ < r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖ < r := by
simp_rw [norm_def, pi_norm_lt_iff hr]
theorem nnnorm_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) {A : Matrix m n α} :
‖A‖₊ < r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖₊ < r := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, pi_nnnorm_lt_iff hr]
theorem norm_entry_le_entrywise_sup_norm (A : Matrix m n α) {i : m} {j : n} : ‖A i j‖ ≤ ‖A‖ :=
(norm_le_pi_norm (A i) j).trans (norm_le_pi_norm A i)
theorem nnnorm_entry_le_entrywise_sup_nnnorm (A : Matrix m n α) {i : m} {j : n} : ‖A i j‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ :=
(nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm (A i) j).trans (nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm A i)
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊) :
‖A.map f‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by
simp only [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def, Matrix.map_apply, hf]
@[simp]
theorem norm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖ = ‖a‖) : ‖A.map f‖ = ‖A‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_map_eq A f fun a => Subtype.ext <| hf a :)
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
Finset.sup_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem norm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_transpose A
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
(nnnorm_map_eq _ _ nnnorm_star).trans A.nnnorm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem norm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᴴ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_conjTranspose A
instance [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] : NormedStarGroup (Matrix m m α) :=
⟨(le_of_eq <| norm_conjTranspose ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias nnnorm_col := nnnorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem norm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_replicateCol v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias norm_col := norm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias nnnorm_row := nnnorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem norm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_replicateRow v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias norm_row := norm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_diagonal [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) : ‖diagonal v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr 1 with i : 1
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun j hj => ?_) ?_
· obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij, nnnorm_zero]
exact zero_le _
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_univ i))
rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem norm_diagonal [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) : ‖diagonal v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_diagonal v
/-- Note this is safe as an instance as it carries no data. -/
-- Porting note: not yet implemented: `@[nolint fails_quickly]`
instance [Nonempty n] [DecidableEq n] [One α] [NormOneClass α] : NormOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨(norm_diagonal _).trans <| norm_one⟩
end SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def normedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.normedAddCommGroup
section NormedSpace
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
/-- This applies to the sup norm of sup norm. -/
protected theorem isBoundedSMul [SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α]
[IsBoundedSMul R α] : IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instIsBoundedSMul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] protected alias boundedSMul := Matrix.isBoundedSMul
variable [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α]
/-- Normed space instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def normedSpace : NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.normedSpace
end NormedSpace
end LinfLinf
/-! ### The $L_\infty$ operator norm
This section defines the matrix norm $\|A\|_\infty = \operatorname{sup}_i (\sum_j \|A_{ij}\|)$.
Note that this is equivalent to the operator norm, considering $A$ as a linear map between two
$L^\infty$ spaces.
-/
section LinftyOp
/-- Seminormed group instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : SeminormedAddCommGroup (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- Normed group instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] :
NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedAddCommGroup (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- This applies to the sup norm of L1 norm. -/
@[local instance]
protected theorem linftyOpIsBoundedSMul
[SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α] [IsBoundedSMul R α] :
IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : IsBoundedSMul R (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- Normed space instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedSpace [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α] :
NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedSpace R (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α]
theorem linfty_opNorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = ((Finset.univ : Finset m).sup fun i : m => ∑ j : n, ‖A i j‖₊ : ℝ≥0) := by
-- Porting note: added
change ‖fun i => (WithLp.equiv 1 _).symm (A i)‖ = _
simp [Pi.norm_def, PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L1]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = (Finset.univ : Finset m).sup fun i : m => ∑ j : n, ‖A i j‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| linfty_opNorm_def A
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNNNorm_col := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNorm_col := linfty_opNorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ∑ i, ‖v i‖₊ := by
simp [linfty_opNNNorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNNNorm_row := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ∑ i, ‖v i‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow v).trans <| by simp [NNReal.coe_sum]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNorm_row := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (v : m → α) : ‖diagonal v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr 1 with i : 1
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.mem_univ i) fun j _hj hij => ?_).trans ?_
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne' _ hij, nnnorm_zero]
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (v : m → α) : ‖diagonal v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_diagonal v
end SeminormedAddCommGroup
section NonUnitalSeminormedRing
variable [NonUnitalSeminormedRing α]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_mul (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix m n α) : ‖A * B‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ * ‖B‖₊ := by
simp_rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Matrix.mul_apply]
calc
(Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ k, ‖∑ j, A i j * B j k‖₊) ≤
Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ k, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * ‖B j k‖₊ :=
Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _hi =>
Finset.sum_le_sum fun k _hk => nnnorm_sum_le_of_le _ fun j _hj => nnnorm_mul_le _ _
_ = Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * ∑ k, ‖B j k‖₊ := by
simp_rw [@Finset.sum_comm m, Finset.mul_sum]
_ ≤ Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖B i j‖₊ := by
refine Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _hi => ?_
gcongr with j hj
exact Finset.le_sup (f := fun i ↦ ∑ k : n, ‖B i k‖₊) hj
_ ≤ (Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊) * Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖B i j‖₊ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_mul, ← NNReal.finset_sup_mul]
rfl
theorem linfty_opNorm_mul (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix m n α) : ‖A * B‖ ≤ ‖A‖ * ‖B‖ :=
linfty_opNNNorm_mul _ _
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec (A : Matrix l m α) (v : m → α) : ‖A *ᵥ v‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ * ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [← linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol (ι := Fin 1) (A *ᵥ v),
← linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol v (ι := Fin 1)]
exact linfty_opNNNorm_mul A (replicateCol (Fin 1) v)
theorem linfty_opNorm_mulVec (A : Matrix l m α) (v : m → α) : ‖A *ᵥ v‖ ≤ ‖A‖ * ‖v‖ :=
linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec _ _
end NonUnitalSeminormedRing
/-- Seminormed non-unital ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a semi normed
non-unital ring. Not declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining
the norm of a matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing [NonUnitalSeminormedRing α] :
NonUnitalSeminormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup, Matrix.instNonUnitalRing with
norm_mul_le := linfty_opNorm_mul }
/-- The `L₁-L∞` norm preserves one on non-empty matrices. Note this is safe as an instance, as it
carries no data. -/
instance linfty_opNormOneClass [SeminormedRing α] [NormOneClass α] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] :
NormOneClass (Matrix n n α) where norm_one := (linfty_opNorm_diagonal _).trans norm_one
/-- Seminormed ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a semi normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpSemiNormedRing [SeminormedRing α] [DecidableEq n] :
SeminormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing, Matrix.instRing with }
/-- Normed non-unital ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed
non-unital ring. Not declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining
the norm of a matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNonUnitalNormedRing [NonUnitalNormedRing α] :
NonUnitalNormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
/-- Normed ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedRing [NormedRing α] [DecidableEq n] : NormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpSemiNormedRing with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
/-- Normed algebra instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed algebra. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedAlgebra [NormedField R] [SeminormedRing α] [NormedAlgebra R α]
[DecidableEq n] : NormedAlgebra R (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNormedSpace, Matrix.instAlgebra with }
section
variable [NormedDivisionRing α] [NormedAlgebra ℝ α]
/-- Auxiliary construction; an element of norm 1 such that `a * unitOf a = ‖a‖`. -/
private def unitOf (a : α) : α := by classical exact if a = 0 then 1 else ‖a‖ • a⁻¹
private theorem norm_unitOf (a : α) : ‖unitOf a‖₊ = 1 := by
rw [unitOf]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· rw [← nnnorm_eq_zero] at h
rw [nnnorm_smul, nnnorm_inv, nnnorm_norm, mul_inv_cancel₀ h]
private theorem mul_unitOf (a : α) : a * unitOf a = algebraMap _ _ (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) := by
simp only [unitOf, coe_nnnorm]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
end
/-!
For a matrix over a field, the norm defined in this section agrees with the operator norm on
`ContinuousLinearMap`s between function types (which have the infinity norm).
-/
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField α] [NormedAlgebra ℝ α]
lemma linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = ‖ContinuousLinearMap.mk (Matrix.mulVecLin A)‖₊ := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.opNNNorm_eq_of_bounds _ (linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec _) fun N hN => ?_]
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def]
refine Finset.sup_le fun i _ => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· simp
classical
let x : n → α := fun j => unitOf (A i j)
have hxn : ‖x‖₊ = 1 := by
simp_rw [x, Pi.nnnorm_def, norm_unitOf, Finset.sup_const Finset.univ_nonempty]
specialize hN x
rw [hxn, mul_one, Pi.nnnorm_def, Finset.sup_le_iff] at hN
replace hN := hN i (Finset.mem_univ _)
dsimp [mulVec, dotProduct] at hN
simp_rw [x, mul_unitOf, ← map_sum, nnnorm_algebraMap, ← NNReal.coe_sum, NNReal.nnnorm_eq,
nnnorm_one, mul_one] at hN
exact hN
lemma linfty_opNorm_eq_opNorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = ‖ContinuousLinearMap.mk (Matrix.mulVecLin A)‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm A)
variable [DecidableEq n]
@[simp] lemma linfty_opNNNorm_toMatrix (f : (n → α) →L[α] (m → α)) :
‖LinearMap.toMatrix' (↑f : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (m → α))‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm]
simp only [← toLin'_apply', toLin'_toMatrix']
@[simp] lemma linfty_opNorm_toMatrix (f : (n → α) →L[α] (m → α)) :
‖LinearMap.toMatrix' (↑f : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (m → α))‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (linfty_opNNNorm_toMatrix f)
end
end LinftyOp
/-! ### The Frobenius norm
This is defined as $\|A\| = \sqrt{\sum_{i,j} \|A_{ij}\|^2}$.
When the matrix is over the real or complex numbers, this norm is submultiplicative.
-/
section frobenius
open scoped Matrix
/-- Seminormed group instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
inferInstanceAs (SeminormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun _i : m => PiLp 2 fun _j : n => α))
/-- Normed group instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a normed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
/-- This applies to the frobenius norm. -/
@[local instance]
theorem frobeniusIsBoundedSMul [SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α]
[IsBoundedSMul R α] :
IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : IsBoundedSMul R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias frobeniusBoundedSMul := frobeniusIsBoundedSMul
/-- Normed space instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedSpace [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α] :
NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedSpace R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) := by
-- Porting note: added, along with `WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply` below
change ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun i => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun j => A i j‖₊ = _
simp_rw [PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2, NNReal.sq_sqrt, NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow, NNReal.rpow_two,
WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
theorem frobenius_norm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (frobenius_nnnorm_def A)).trans <| by simp [NNReal.coe_sum]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊) :
‖A.map f‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by simp_rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, Matrix.map_apply, hf]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖ = ‖a‖) :
‖A.map f‖ = ‖A‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq A f fun a => Subtype.ext <| hf a :)
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by
rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, frobenius_nnnorm_def, Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_transpose A
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
(frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq _ _ nnnorm_star).trans A.frobenius_nnnorm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose A
instance frobenius_normedStarGroup [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] :
NormedStarGroup (Matrix m m α) :=
⟨(le_of_eq <| frobenius_norm_conjTranspose ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_replicateRow (v : m → α) :
‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [replicateRow_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_norm_row := frobenius_norm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_replicateRow (v : m → α) :
‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| frobenius_norm_replicateRow v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_nnnorm_row := frobenius_nnnorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_replicateCol (v : n → α) :
‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
simp_rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [replicateCol_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_norm_col := frobenius_norm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_replicateCol (v : n → α) :
| ‖replicateCol ι v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| frobenius_norm_replicateCol v
| Mathlib/Analysis/Matrix.lean | 567 | 569 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogBounds
/-!
# Complex arctangent
This file defines the complex arctangent `Complex.arctan` as
$$\arctan z = -\frac i2 \log \frac{1 + zi}{1 - zi}$$
and shows that it extends `Real.arctan` to the complex plane. Its Taylor series expansion
$$\arctan z = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n + 1} z^{2n + 1},\ |z|<1$$
is proved in `Complex.hasSum_arctan`.
-/
namespace Complex
open scoped Real
/-- The complex arctangent, defined via the complex logarithm. -/
noncomputable def arctan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := -I / 2 * log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I))
theorem tan_arctan {z : ℂ} (h₁ : z ≠ I) (h₂ : z ≠ -I) : tan (arctan z) = z := by
unfold tan sin cos
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
-- multiply top and bottom by `exp (arctan z * I)`
← mul_div_mul_right _ _ (exp_ne_zero (arctan z * I)), sub_mul, add_mul,
← exp_add, neg_mul, neg_add_cancel, exp_zero, ← exp_add, ← two_mul]
have z₁ : 1 + z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₁
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg] at h₁
exact h₁.symm
have z₂ : 1 - z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₂
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, one_mul] at h₂
exact h₂.symm
have key : exp (2 * (arctan z * I)) = (1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I) := by
rw [arctan, ← mul_rotate, ← mul_assoc,
show 2 * (I * (-I / 2)) = 1 by field_simp, one_mul, exp_log]
· exact div_ne_zero z₁ z₂
-- multiply top and bottom by `1 - z * I`
rw [key, ← mul_div_mul_right _ _ z₂, sub_mul, add_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ z₂, one_mul,
show _ / _ * I = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
/-- `cos z` is nonzero when the bounds in `arctan_tan` are met (`z` lies in the vertical strip
`-π / 2 < z.re < π / 2` and `z ≠ π / 2`). -/
lemma cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re)
(h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) : cos z ≠ 0 := by
refine cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun k ↦ ?_)
rw [ne_eq, Complex.ext_iff, not_and_or] at h₀ ⊢
norm_cast at h₀ ⊢
rcases h₀ with nr | ni
· left; contrapose! nr
rw [nr, mul_div_assoc, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₁
rw [nr, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₂
norm_cast at h₁ h₂
change -1 < _ at h₁
rwa [show 2 * k + 1 = 1 by omega, Int.cast_one, one_mul] at nr
· exact Or.inr ni
theorem arctan_tan {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re) (h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) :
arctan (tan z) = z := by
have h := cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds h₀ h₁ h₂
unfold arctan tan
-- multiply top and bottom by `cos z`
rw [← mul_div_mul_right (1 + _) _ h, add_mul, sub_mul, one_mul, ← mul_rotate, mul_div_cancel₀ _ h]
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, 1, 2]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← sin_neg, ← cos_neg]
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I, ← exp_sub, show z * I - -z * I = 2 * (I * z) by ring, log_exp,
show -I / 2 * (2 * (I * z)) = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
all_goals norm_num
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' two_pos, neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' two_pos]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_arctan (x : ℝ) : (Real.arctan x : ℂ) = arctan x := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Real.tan_arctan x]
rw [ofReal_tan, arctan_tan]
all_goals norm_cast
· rw [← ne_eq]; exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).ne
· exact Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan _
· exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).le
/-- The argument of `1 + z` for `z` in the open unit disc is always in `(-π / 2, π / 2)`. -/
lemma arg_one_add_mem_Ioo {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) : (1 + z).arg ∈ Set.Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [Set.mem_Ioo, ← abs_lt, abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, add_re, one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add']
exact Or.inl (abs_lt.mp ((abs_re_le_norm z).trans_lt hz)).1
/-- We can combine the logs in `log (1 + z * I) + -log (1 - z * I)` into one.
This is only used in `hasSum_arctan`. -/
lemma hasSum_arctan_aux {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
log (1 + z * I) + -log (1 - z * I) = log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I)) := by
have z₁ := mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one (z := z * I) (by simpa))
have z₂ := mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one (z := -(z * I)) (by simpa))
rw [← sub_eq_add_neg] at z₂
rw [← log_inv _ z₂.1, ← (log_mul_eq_add_log_iff z₁.2 (inv_eq_zero.ne.mpr z₂.2)).mpr,
div_eq_mul_inv]
-- `log_mul_eq_add_log_iff` requires a bound on `arg (1 + z * I) + arg (1 - z * I)⁻¹`.
-- `arg_one_add_mem_Ioo` provides sufficiently tight bounds on both terms
have b₁ := arg_one_add_mem_Ioo (z := z * I) (by simpa)
have b₂ : arg (1 - z * I)⁻¹ ∈ Set.Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
simp_rw [arg_inv, z₂.1, ite_false, Set.neg_mem_Ioo_iff, neg_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact arg_one_add_mem_Ioo (by simpa)
have c₁ := add_lt_add b₁.1 b₂.1
have c₂ := add_lt_add b₁.2 b₂.2
rw [show -(π / 2) + -(π / 2) = -π by ring] at c₁
rw [show π / 2 + π / 2 = π by ring] at c₂
exact ⟨c₁, c₂.le⟩
/-- The power series expansion of `Complex.arctan`, valid on the open unit disc. -/
| theorem hasSum_arctan {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (-1) ^ n * z ^ (2 * n + 1) / ↑(2 * n + 1)) (arctan z) := by
have := ((hasSum_taylorSeries_log (z := z * I) (by simpa)).add
(hasSum_taylorSeries_neg_log (z := z * I) (by simpa))).mul_left (-I / 2)
simp_rw [← add_div, ← add_one_mul, hasSum_arctan_aux hz] at this
replace := (Nat.divModEquiv 2).symm.hasSum_iff.mpr this
dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp_rw [← mul_comm 2 _] at this
refine this.prod_fiberwise fun k => ?_
dsimp only
convert hasSum_fintype (_ : Fin 2 → ℂ) using 1
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, Odd.neg_one_pow (n := 2 * k + 0 + 1) (by simp),
neg_add_cancel, zero_mul, zero_div, mul_zero, zero_add,
show 2 * k + 1 + 1 = 2 * (k + 1) by ring, Even.neg_one_pow (n := 2 * (k + 1)) (by simp),
← mul_div_assoc (_ / _), ← mul_assoc, show -I / 2 * (1 + 1) = -I by ring]
congr 1
rw [mul_pow, pow_succ' I, pow_mul, I_sq,
show -I * _ = -(I * I) * (-1) ^ k * z ^ (2 * k + 1) by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arctan.lean | 115 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Group actions by isometries
In this file we define two typeclasses:
- `IsIsometricSMul M X` says that `M` multiplicatively acts on a (pseudo extended) metric space
`X` by isometries;
- `IsIsometricVAdd` is an additive version of `IsIsometricSMul`.
We also prove basic facts about isometric actions and define bundled isometries
`IsometryEquiv.constSMul`, `IsometryEquiv.mulLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.mulRight`,
`IsometryEquiv.divLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.divRight`, and `IsometryEquiv.inv`, as well as their
additive versions.
If `G` is a group, then `IsIsometricSMul G G` means that `G` has a left-invariant metric while
`IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G` means that `G` has a right-invariant metric. For a commutative group,
these two notions are equivalent. A group with a right-invariant metric can be also represented as a
`NormedGroup`.
-/
open Set
open ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable (M : Type u) (G : Type v) (X : Type w)
/-- An additive action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c +ᵥ x` is an isometry. -/
class IsIsometricVAdd [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [VAdd M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_vadd : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c +ᵥ ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricVAdd := IsIsometricVAdd
/-- A multiplicative action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c • x` is an isometry. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsIsometricSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_smul : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c • ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricSMul := IsIsometricSMul
-- Porting note: Lean 4 doesn't support `[]` in classes, so make a lemma instead of `export`ing
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_smul {M : Type u} (X : Type w) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) : Isometry (c • · : X → X) :=
IsIsometricSMul.isometry_smul c
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.to_continuousConstSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] : ContinuousConstSMul M X :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_smul X c).continuous⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.opposite_of_comm [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X] [IsCentralScalar M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] : IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X :=
⟨fun c x y => by simpa only [← op_smul_eq_smul] using isometry_smul X c.unop x y⟩
variable {M G X}
section EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [Group G] [MulAction G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_smul_left [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
edist (c • x) (c • y) = edist x y :=
isometry_smul X c x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ediam_smul [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
EMetric.diam (c • s) = EMetric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).ediam_image s
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a : M) :
Isometry (a * ·) :=
isometry_smul M a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * b) (a * c) = edist b c :=
isometry_mul_left a b c
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a : M) :
Isometry fun x => x * a :=
isometry_smul M (MulOpposite.op a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * c) (b * c) = edist a b :=
isometry_mul_right c a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : edist (a / c) (b / c) = edist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_inv_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b : G) : edist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = edist a b := by
rw [← edist_mul_left a, ← edist_mul_right _ _ b, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right,
edist_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] :
Isometry (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(x y : G) : edist x⁻¹ y = edist x y⁻¹ := by rw [← edist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_left [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b c : G) : edist (a / b) (a / c) = edist b c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_left, edist_inv_inv]
namespace IsometryEquiv
/-- If a group `G` acts on `X` by isometries, then `IsometryEquiv.constSMul` is the isometry of
`X` given by multiplication of a constant element of the group. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! toEquiv apply) "If an additive group `G` acts on `X` by isometries,
then `IsometryEquiv.constVAdd` is the isometry of `X` given by addition of a constant element of the
group."]
def constSMul (c : G) : X ≃ᵢ X where
toEquiv := MulAction.toPerm c
isometry_toFun := isometry_smul X c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem constSMul_symm (c : G) : (constSMul c : X ≃ᵢ X).symm = constSMul c⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ x * y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulLeft [IsIsometricSMul G G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_mul_left c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulLeft_symm [IsIsometricSMul G G] (x : G) :
(mulLeft x).symm = IsometryEquiv.mulLeft x⁻¹ :=
constSMul_symm x
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ y * x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_mul_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (x : G) : (mulRight x).symm = mulRight x⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Division `y ↦ y / x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Subtraction `y ↦ y - x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_div_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem divRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : (divRight c).symm = mulRight c :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
/-- Division `y ↦ x / y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply symm_apply toEquiv)
"Subtraction `y ↦ x - y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divLeft (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_div_left c
variable (G)
/-- Inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def inv : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.inv G
isometry_toFun := edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem inv_symm : (inv G).symm = inv G := rfl
end IsometryEquiv
namespace EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_ball _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' ball x r = ball (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_ball]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_closedBall _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r = closedBall (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_closedBall]
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_ball [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_ball a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_ball [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_ball (MulOpposite.op a) b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_closedBall a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_closedBall (MulOpposite.op a) b r
end EMetric
end EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
dist (c • x) (c • y) = dist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).dist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
nndist (c • x) (c • y) = nndist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).nndist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
Metric.diam (c • s) = Metric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).diam_image s
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * b) (a * c) = dist b c :=
dist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * b) (a * c) = nndist b c :=
nndist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * c) (b * c) = dist a b :=
dist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_right [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * c) (b * c) = nndist a b :=
nndist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : dist (a / c) (b / c) = dist a b := by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : nndist (a / c) (b / c) = nndist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, nndist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : dist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = dist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).dist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : nndist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = nndist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).nndist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : dist (a / b) (a / c) = dist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : nndist (a / b) (a / c) = nndist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
/-- If `G` acts isometrically on `X`, then the image of a bounded set in `X` under scalar
multiplication by `c : G` is bounded. See also `Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀` for a similar lemma about
normed spaces. -/
@[to_additive "Given an additive isometric action of `G` on `X`, the image of a bounded set in `X`
under translation by `c : G` is bounded"]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X] {s : Set X}
(hs : IsBounded s) (c : G) : IsBounded (c • s) :=
(isometry_smul X c).lipschitz.isBounded_image hs
namespace Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace X] [Group G] [MulAction G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| theorem smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_ball _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/IsometricSMul.lean | 325 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Continuous
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
/-!
# Quaternions as a normed algebra
In this file we define the following structures on the space `ℍ := ℍ[ℝ]` of quaternions:
* inner product space;
* normed ring;
* normed space over `ℝ`.
We show that the norm on `ℍ[ℝ]` agrees with the euclidean norm of its components.
## Notation
The following notation is available with `open Quaternion` or `open scoped Quaternion`:
* `ℍ` : quaternions
## Tags
quaternion, normed ring, normed space, normed algebra
-/
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ" => Quaternion ℝ
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Quaternion
instance : Inner ℝ ℍ :=
⟨fun a b => (a * star b).re⟩
theorem inner_self (a : ℍ) : ⟪a, a⟫ = normSq a :=
rfl
theorem inner_def (a b : ℍ) : ⟪a, b⟫ = (a * star b).re :=
rfl
noncomputable instance : NormedAddCommGroup ℍ :=
@InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup ℝ ℍ _ _ _
{ toInner := inferInstance
conj_inner_symm := fun x y => by simp [inner_def, mul_comm]
re_inner_nonneg := fun _ => normSq_nonneg
definite := fun _ => normSq_eq_zero.1
add_left := fun x y z => by simp only [inner_def, add_mul, add_re]
smul_left := fun x y r => by simp [inner_def] }
noncomputable instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℍ :=
InnerProductSpace.ofCore _
theorem normSq_eq_norm_mul_self (a : ℍ) : normSq a = ‖a‖ * ‖a‖ := by
rw [← inner_self, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
instance : NormOneClass ℍ :=
⟨by rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq.map_one, Real.sqrt_one]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem norm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_coe, Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| norm_coe a
-- This does not need to be `@[simp]`, as it is a consequence of later simp lemmas.
theorem norm_star (a : ℍ) : ‖star a‖ = ‖a‖ := by
simp_rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_star]
-- This does not need to be `@[simp]`, as it is a consequence of later simp lemmas.
theorem nnnorm_star (a : ℍ) : ‖star a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| norm_star a
noncomputable instance : NormedDivisionRing ℍ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul _ _ := by simp [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self]
noncomputable instance : NormedAlgebra ℝ ℍ where
norm_smul_le := norm_smul_le
toAlgebra := Quaternion.algebra
instance : CStarRing ℍ where
norm_mul_self_le x :=
le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| (norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_star x)
/-- Coercion from `ℂ` to `ℍ`. -/
@[coe] def coeComplex (z : ℂ) : ℍ := ⟨z.re, z.im, 0, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℂ ℍ := ⟨coeComplex⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_re (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imI (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imI = z.im :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imJ (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_imK (z : ℂ) : (z : ℍ).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_add (z w : ℂ) : ↑(z + w) = (z + w : ℍ) := by ext <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_mul (z w : ℂ) : ↑(z * w) = (z * w : ℍ) := by ext <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_zero : ((0 : ℂ) : ℍ) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_one : ((1 : ℂ) : ℍ) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_real_complex_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r • z : ℍ) = ↑r * ↑z := by ext <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeComplex_coe (r : ℝ) : ((r : ℂ) : ℍ) = r :=
rfl
/-- Coercion `ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] ℍ` as an algebra homomorphism. -/
def ofComplex : ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] ℍ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := coeComplex_add
map_mul' := coeComplex_mul
commutes' _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofComplex : ⇑ofComplex = coeComplex := rfl
/-- The norm of the components as a euclidean vector equals the norm of the quaternion. -/
| theorem norm_piLp_equiv_symm_equivTuple (x : ℍ) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Quaternion.lean | 150 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :
Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace IsCauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] {f g : ℕ → β}
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
--@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := by
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij k ik => ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) ?_)
rw [abv_sub abv]; exact hi _ ik
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0
⟨i, fun _ ij _ jk => H _ (le_trans ij jk) _ ij⟩
lemma bounded (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := by
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hf _ zero_lt_one
set R : ℕ → α := @Nat.rec (fun _ => α) (abv (f 0)) fun i c => max c (abv (f i.succ)) with hR
have : ∀ i, ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R i := by
refine Nat.rec (by simp [hR]) ?_
rintro i hi j (rfl | hj)
· simp [R]
· exact (hi j hj).trans (le_max_left _ _)
refine ⟨R i + 1, fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain hji | hij := le_total j i
· exact (this i _ hji).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· simpa using (abv_add abv _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this i _ le_rfl) (h _ hij)
lemma bounded' (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := hf.bounded
⟨max r (x + 1), (lt_add_one x).trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
fun i ↦ (h i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩
lemma const (x : β) : IsCauSeq abv fun _ ↦ x :=
fun ε ε0 ↦ ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero] using ε0⟩
theorem add (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f + g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
lemma mul (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f * g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, _, hF⟩ := hf.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, _, hG⟩ := hg.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun j ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
@[simp] lemma _root_.isCauSeq_neg : IsCauSeq abv (-f) ↔ IsCauSeq abv f := by
simp only [IsCauSeq, Pi.neg_apply, ← neg_sub', abv_neg]
protected alias ⟨of_neg, neg⟩ := isCauSeq_neg
end IsCauSeq
/-- `CauSeq β abv` is the type of `β`-valued Cauchy sequences, with respect to the absolute value
function `abv`. -/
def CauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) : Type _ :=
{ f : ℕ → β // IsCauSeq abv f }
namespace CauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section Ring
variable [Ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : CoeFun (CauSeq β abv) fun _ => ℕ → β :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g := Subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem isCauSeq (f : CauSeq β abv) : IsCauSeq abv f :=
f.2
theorem cauchy (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∀ {ε}, 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := @f.2
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f`, create a Cauchy sequence from a sequence `g` with
the same values as `f`. -/
def ofEq (f : CauSeq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨g, fun ε => by rw [show g = f from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} :
0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} : 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded
theorem bounded' (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded' x
instance : Add (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f + g) = (f : ℕ → β) + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem add_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i :=
rfl
variable (abv) in
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : CauSeq β abv := ⟨fun _ ↦ x, IsCauSeq.const _⟩
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_const (x : β) : (const x : ℕ → β) = Function.const ℕ x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x :=
rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : CauSeq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => congr_arg (fun f : CauSeq β abv => (f : ℕ → β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : CauSeq β abv) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CauSeq β abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : CauSeq β abv) i = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : CauSeq β abv) i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_zero : const 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_one : const 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
rfl
instance : Mul (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f g ↦ ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f * g) = (f : ℕ → β) * g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i :=
rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
rfl
instance : Neg (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f ↦ ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem neg_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i :=
rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ofEq (f + -g) (fun x => f x - g x) fun i => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f - g) = (f : ℕ → β) - g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i :=
rfl
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β]
instance : SMul G (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f => (ofEq (const (a • (1 : β)) * f) (a • (f : ℕ → β))) fun _ => smul_one_mul _ _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(a • f) = a • (f : ℕ → β) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem smul_apply (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (a • f) i = a • f i :=
rfl
theorem const_smul (a : G) (x : β) : const (a • x) = a • const x :=
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower G (CauSeq β abv) (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f g => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc a (f : ℕ → β) (g : ℕ → β)⟩
end SMul
instance addGroup : AddGroup (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instNatCast : NatCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroupWithOne Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl
coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
instance : Pow (CauSeq β abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n =>
(ofEq (npowRec n f) fun i => f i ^ n) <| by induction n <;> simp [*, npowRec, pow_succ]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (f : CauSeq β abv) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (f : ℕ → β) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pow_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (n i : ℕ) : (f ^ n) i = f i ^ n :=
rfl
theorem const_pow (x : β) (n : ℕ) : const (x ^ n) = const x ^ n :=
rfl
instance ring : Ring (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.ring Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl coe_add coe_mul coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) coe_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] : CommRing (CauSeq β abv) :=
{ CauSeq.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b => ext fun n => by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- `LimZero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def LimZero {abv : β → α} (f : CauSeq β abv) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f + g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ <| half_pos ε0) (hg _ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_limZero_right (f : CauSeq β abv) {g} (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 F0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt <| hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem mul_limZero_left {f} (g : CauSeq β abv) (hg : LimZero f) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 G0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _)
rwa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem neg_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) : LimZero (-f) := by
rw [← neg_one_mul f]
exact mul_limZero_right _ hf
theorem sub_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f - g) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_limZero hf (neg_limZero hg)
theorem limZero_sub_rev {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hfg : LimZero (f - g)) : LimZero (g - f) := by
simpa using neg_limZero hfg
theorem zero_limZero : LimZero (0 : CauSeq β abv)
| ε, ε0 => ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_limZero {x : β} : LimZero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun H =>
(abv_eq_zero abv).1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _)) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, hi⟩ := H _ ε0
le_of_lt <| hi _ le_rfl,
fun e => e.symm ▸ zero_limZero⟩
instance equiv : Setoid (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => LimZero (f - g),
⟨fun f => by simp [zero_limZero],
fun f ε hε => by simpa using neg_limZero f ε hε,
fun fg gh => by simpa using add_limZero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem add_equiv_add {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 + g1 ≈ f2 + g2 := by simpa only [← add_sub_add_comm] using add_limZero hf hg
theorem neg_equiv_neg {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f ≈ g) : -f ≈ -g := by
simpa only [neg_sub'] using neg_limZero hf
theorem sub_equiv_sub {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 - g1 ≈ f2 - g2 := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_equiv_add hf (neg_equiv_neg hg)
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ <| half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij k jk => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk))
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem limZero_congr {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : LimZero f ↔ LimZero g :=
⟨fun l => by simpa using add_limZero (Setoid.symm h) l, fun l => by simpa using add_limZero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
by_contra nk
refine hf fun ε ε0 => ?_
simp? [not_forall] at nk says
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ge_iff_le, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp,
not_le] at nk
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0)
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩
refine ⟨j, fun k jk => ?_⟩
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj)
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : CauSeq β abv) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) :
IsCauSeq abv f
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (h _ (half_pos <| half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)
⟨i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl; rw [abv_sub abv] at h₁
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁)
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij))
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this⟩
theorem not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ¬LimZero f := by
intro h
have : LimZero (f - 0) := by simp [h]
exact hf this
theorem mul_equiv_zero (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (g * f) := mul_limZero_right _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (g * f - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_equiv_zero' (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (f * g) := mul_limZero_left _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (f * g - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : ¬f * g ≈ 0 :=
fun (this : LimZero (f * g - 0)) => by
have hlz : LimZero (f * g) := by simpa
have hf' : ¬LimZero f := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (f - 0) from hf
have hg' : ¬LimZero g := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (g - 0) from hg
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩
have : 0 < a1 * a2 := mul_pos ha1 ha2
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hlz _ this
let i := max N (max N1 N2)
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _)
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
apply not_le_of_lt hN'
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _)
rw [abv_mul abv]
gcongr
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show LimZero _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_limZero, sub_eq_zero]
theorem mul_equiv_mul {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 * g1 ≈ f2 * g2 := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
using add_limZero (mul_limZero_left g1 hf) (mul_limZero_right f2 hg)
theorem smul_equiv_smul {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β] {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (c : G)
(hf : f1 ≈ f2) : c • f1 ≈ c • f2 := by
simpa [const_smul, smul_one_mul _ _] using
mul_equiv_mul (const_equiv.mpr <| Eq.refl <| c • (1 : β)) hf
theorem pow_equiv_pow {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (n : ℕ) : f1 ^ n ≈ f2 ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, Setoid.refl]
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ'] using mul_equiv_mul hf ih
end Ring
section IsDomain
variable [Ring β] [IsDomain β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem one_not_equiv_zero : ¬const abv 1 ≈ const abv 0 := fun h =>
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, i ≤ k → abv (1 - 0) < ε := h
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt fun h2 : 0 < abv 1 =>
(Exists.elim (this _ h2)) fun i hi => lt_irrefl (abv 1) <| by simpa using hi _ le_rfl
have h2 : 0 ≤ abv 1 := abv_nonneg abv _
have : abv 1 = 0 := le_antisymm h1 h2
have : (1 : β) = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).mp this
absurd this one_ne_zero
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε
| _, ε0 =>
let ⟨_, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f` with nonzero limit, create a Cauchy sequence with values equal to
the inverses of the values of `f`. -/
def inv (f : CauSeq β abv) (hf : ¬LimZero f) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : ⇑(inv f hf) = (f : ℕ → β)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem inv_apply {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : f * inv f hf ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
const abv x⁻¹ = inv (const abv x) (by rwa [const_limZero]) :=
rfl
end DivisionRing
section Abs
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def Pos (f : CauSeq α abs) : Prop :=
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_limZero_of_pos {f : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → ¬LimZero f
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0)
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ le_rfl
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : Pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨fun ⟨_, K0, _, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ le_rfl), fun h => ⟨x, h, 0, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → LimZero g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0))
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h j ij
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this⟩
protected theorem mul_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f * g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, mul_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : CauSeq α abs) : Pos f ∨ LimZero f ∨ Pos (-f) := by
rcases Classical.em (LimZero f) with h | h <;> simp [*]
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp ?_ ?_ <;>
refine fun h => ⟨K, K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩ <;>
have := (hi _ ij).1 <;>
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl
· rwa [abs_of_nonneg] at this
rw [abs_of_nonneg h] at h₁
exact
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ <| neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).1)
· rwa [abs_of_nonpos] at this
rw [abs_of_nonpos h] at h₁
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub]
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).2) h₁
instance : LT (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => Pos (g - f)⟩
instance : LE (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert pos_add_limZero fg (neg_limZero gh) using 1
simp
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h := by
have := pos_add_limZero gh (neg_limZero fg)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert add_pos fg gh using 1
simp
theorem lt_irrefl {f : CauSeq α abs} : ¬f < f
| h => not_limZero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_limZero])
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (Or.inl ∘ CauSeq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg) (Or.inr ∘ Setoid.trans hfg)
theorem le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (fun h => Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh)) fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.trans h hgh)
instance : Preorder (CauSeq α abs) where
lt := (· < ·)
le f g := f < g ∨ f ≈ g
le_refl _ := Or.inr (Setoid.refl _)
le_trans _ _ _ fg gh :=
match fg, gh with
| Or.inl fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_trans fg gh
| Or.inl fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inr <| Setoid.trans fg gh
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Or.inl h, not_or_intro (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_limZero_of_pos h)⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₁.resolve_right (mt (fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩
theorem le_antisymm {f g : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right fun h =>
h.imp (fun h => Setoid.symm h) fun h => by rwa [neg_sub] at h
theorem le_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or_assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right Or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show Pos _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq]; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
theorem le_of_exists {f g : CauSeq α abs} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
(or_assoc.2 (CauSeq.lt_total f g)).elim id fun hgf =>
False.elim
(let ⟨_, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _)))))
theorem exists_gt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, fun i _ => by
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt
⟨-a, show Pos _ by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_sup_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊔ a₂ - b₁ ⊔ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_inf_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊓ a₂ - b₁ ⊓ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
instance : Max (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_sup_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
instance : Min (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊓ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_inf_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊔ g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊓ g :=
rfl
theorem sup_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊔ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_sup_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.1), sup_lt_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.2, H₂.2⟩⟩
theorem inf_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊓ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.1, H₂.1⟩, inf_lt_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.2)⟩
theorem sup_equiv_sup {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊔ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊔ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
theorem inf_equiv_inf {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊓ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊓ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
protected theorem sup_lt {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a < c) (hb : b < c) : a ⊔ b < c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εa, εa0, ia, ha⟩, ⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩⟩ := ha, hb
refine ⟨εa ⊓ εb, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εa0, εb0⟩, ia ⊔ ib, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (ha _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_left _ _ _)
protected theorem lt_inf {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (hb : a < b) (hc : a < c) : a < b ⊓ c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩, ⟨εc, εc0, ic, hc⟩⟩ := hb, hc
refine ⟨εb ⊓ εc, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εb0, εc0⟩, ib ⊔ ic, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hc _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_right _ _ _)
|
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_idem (a : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ a = a := Subtype.ext (sup_idem _)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 780 | 782 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`"]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator` for the version with `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator` for the version with `s`."]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator' : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) 1 sᶜ :=
fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hx f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator {t : Set β} {g : β → M} {b : β}
(h1 : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) (h2 : f a = g b) :
s.mulIndicator f a = t.mulIndicator g b := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp_all
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_eq_mulIndicator_const {t : Set β} {b : β} {c : M} (h : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) :
s.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) a = t.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) b :=
mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator h rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all +contextual
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by
simp only [mulIndicator, Function.comp]
split_ifs with h h' h'' <;> first | rfl | contradiction
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_image {s : Set α} {f : β → M} {g : α → β} (hg : Injective g) {x : α} :
mulIndicator (g '' s) f (g x) = mulIndicator s (f ∘ g) x := by
rw [← mulIndicator_comp_right, preimage_image_eq _ hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_of_one {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) :
mulIndicator s (g ∘ f) = g ∘ mulIndicator s f := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator_const (c : M) (f : M → N) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
(fun x => f (s.mulIndicator (fun _ => c) x)) = s.mulIndicator fun _ => f c :=
(mulIndicator_comp_of_one hf).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (B : Set M) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' B = s.ite (f ⁻¹' B) (1 ⁻¹' B) :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
piecewise_preimage s f 1 B
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_one_preimage (s : Set M) :
t.mulIndicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_one', preimage_one]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) [Decidable (a ∈ s)]
[Decidable ((1 : M) ∈ s)] : (U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s =
(if a ∈ s then U else ∅) ∪ if (1 : M) ∈ s then Uᶜ else ∅ := by
rw [mulIndicator_preimage, preimage_one, preimage_const]
split_ifs <;> simp [← compl_eq_univ_diff]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) :
(U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem indicator_one_preimage [Zero M] (U : Set α) (s : Set M) :
U.indicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) :=
indicator_const_preimage _ _ 1
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage_of_not_mem (s : Set α) (f : α → M) {t : Set M} (ht : (1 : M) ∉ t) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' t = f ⁻¹' t ∩ s := by
simp [mulIndicator_preimage, Pi.one_def, Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem ht]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_range_mulIndicator {r : M} {s : Set α} {f : α → M} :
r ∈ range (mulIndicator s f) ↔ r = 1 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by
simp [mulIndicator, ite_eq_iff, exists_or, eq_univ_iff_forall, and_comm, or_comm,
@eq_comm _ r 1]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_rel_mulIndicator {r : M → M → Prop} (h1 : r 1 1) (ha : a ∈ s → r (f a) (g a)) :
r (mulIndicator s f a) (mulIndicator s g a) := by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with has
exacts [ha has, h1]
end One
section Monoid
variable [MulOneClass M] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
| @[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply (f : α → M) (s t : Set α) (a : α) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f a * mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f a
= mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a := by
by_cases hs : a ∈ s <;> by_cases ht : a ∈ t <;> simp [*]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 286 | 290 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp [jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
simp [oddKernel, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
simpa
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
simp [sinKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂'_conj, map_ofNat]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simpa), zero_div]
lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
@[simp] lemma oddKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : oddKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using oddKernel_neg 0 x
lemma sinKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
sinKernel (-a) x = -sinKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left,
neg_div]
@[simp] lemma sinKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : sinKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using sinKernel_neg 0 x
/-- The odd kernel is continuous on `Ioi 0`. -/
lemma continuousOn_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (oddKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (oddKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [oddKernel_def' a]
refine fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_).continuousWithinAt
· fun_prop
· have hf : Continuous fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u) := by fun_prop
apply ContinuousAt.add
· exact ((continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt).div_const _
· exact continuousAt_const.mul <| (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x)
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt
lemma continuousOn_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (sinKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (sinKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [sinKernel_def]
apply (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).div_const
have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' a (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
fun_prop
lemma oddKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
oddKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (3 / 2 : ℝ) * sinKernel a (1 / x) := by
-- first reduce to `0 < x`
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [oddKernel_undef _ hx, sinKernel_undef _ (one_div_nonpos.mpr hx), mul_zero]
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
have h1 : -1 / (I * ↑(1 / x)) = I * x := by rw [one_div, ofReal_inv, mul_comm, ← div_div,
div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm]
have h2 : (-I * (I * ↑(1 / x))) = 1 / x := by
rw [← mul_assoc, neg_mul, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
have h3 : (x : ℂ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, hx.ne', false_and, not_false_eq_true]
have h4 : arg x ≠ π := by rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le]; exact pi_ne_zero.symm
rw [← ofReal_inj, oddKernel_def, ofReal_mul, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation',
h1, h2]
generalize jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * ↑x) = J
rw [one_div (x : ℂ), inv_cpow _ _ h4, div_inv_eq_mul, one_div, ofReal_inv, ofReal_cpow hx.le,
ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_ofNat, ← mul_div_assoc _ _ (-2 * π : ℂ),
eq_div_iff <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero),
← div_eq_inv_mul, eq_div_iff h3, mul_comm J _, mul_right_comm]
end kernel_defs
section sum_formulas
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_oddKernel (a : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ (n + a) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * x)) (oddKernel ↑a x) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, oddKernel_def' a x]
have h1 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
have h2 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
refine (((h2.div_const (2 * π * I)).add (h1.mul_left ↑a)).mul_left
(cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x))).congr_fun (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, mul_assoc (2 * π * I), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← add_mul,
mul_left_comm, jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul]
congrm _ * cexp (?_ * x)
simp only [mul_right_comm _ I, add_mul, mul_assoc _ I, I_mul_I]
ring_nf
lemma hasSum_int_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum
(fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(sinKernel a t) := by
have h : -2 * (π : ℂ) ≠ (0 : ℂ) := by
simp only [neg_mul, ne_eq, neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, ofReal_eq_zero, pi_ne_zero, or_self, not_false_eq_true]
rw [sinKernel_def]
refine ((hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term a
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).div_const _).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, jacobiTheta₂_term, ofReal_exp, mul_assoc (-I * n), ← Complex.exp_add,
eq_div_iff h, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg, ofReal_intCast,
mul_comm _ (-2 * π : ℂ), ← mul_assoc]
congrm ?_ * cexp (?_ + ?_)
· simp [mul_assoc]
· exact mul_right_comm (2 * π * I) a n
· simp [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I]
lemma hasSum_nat_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * n * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(sinKernel ↑a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal]
have := (hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
simp only [Int.cast_zero, sq (0 : ℂ), zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, ofReal_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ofReal_natCast,
ofReal_ofNat, ← add_mul, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
push_cast
congr 1
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_self two_ne_zero, one_mul,
neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm _ I, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I, neg_mul,
← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_sub]
congr 3 <;> ring
end sum_formulas
section asymp
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `oddKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (oddKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H b =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_one b
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simpa [← (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int,
HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le] using
norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).summable.norm
/-- The function `sinKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (sinKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_one (le_refl 0)
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat, ← (hasSum_nat_sinKernel a ht).tsum_eq]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded (g := fun n ↦ 2 * HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat 1 0 t n)
· exact (HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 1 0 ht).hasSum.mul_left _
· intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_one, add_zero,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, Real.norm_eq_abs, Nat.abs_cast, ← mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (Nat.cast_nonneg _) (abs_sin_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of an FE-pair
-/
/-- A `StrongFEPair` structure with `f = oddKernel a` and `g = sinKernel a`. -/
@[simps]
def hurwitzOddFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : StrongFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal ∘ oddKernel a
g := ofReal ∘ sinKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_oddKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_sinKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 3 / 2
hk := by norm_num
ε := 1
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := 0
hf₀ := rfl
g₀ := 0
hg₀ := rfl
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_oddKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
hg_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_sinKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp [← ofReal_mul, oddKernel_functional_equation a, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx)]
end FEPair
/-!
## Definition of the completed odd Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
` Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedSinZeta a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, StrongFEPair.Λ, hurwitzOddFEPair, mellin, oddKernel_neg,
integral_neg, neg_div]
lemma completedSinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta (-a) s = -completedSinZeta a s := by
simp [completedSinZeta, StrongFEPair.Λ, mellin, StrongFEPair.symm, WeakFEPair.symm,
hurwitzOddFEPair, sinKernel_neg, integral_neg, neg_div]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, completedSinZeta,
(by { push_cast; ring } : (1 - s + 1) / 2 = ↑(3 / 2 : ℝ) - (s + 1) / 2),
← hurwitzOddFEPair_k, (hurwitzOddFEPair a).functional_equation ((s + 1) / 2),
hurwitzOddFEPair_ε, one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedSinZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp [← completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub]
/-!
## Relation to the Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(first version, with sum over `ℤ`). -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * (-I) * Int.sign n *
cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / (↑|n| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (completedSinZeta a s) := by
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := -I * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / 2
have hc (n : ℤ) : ‖c n‖ = 1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [c, (by { push_cast; ring } : 2 * π * I * a * n = ↑(2 * π * a * n) * I), norm_div,
RCLike.norm_ofNat, norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_I, one_mul, norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I]
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * n * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) (sinKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_right_comm (-I)]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |↑i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [hc, div_right_comm]
apply Summable.div_const
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg <;>
simpa
refine (mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum).congr_fun
fun n ↦ ?_
simp [Int.sign_eq_sign, ← Int.cast_abs] -- non-terminal simp OK when `ring` follows
ring
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(second version, with sum over `ℕ`). -/
lemma hasSum_nat_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s)
(completedSinZeta a s) := by
have := (hasSum_int_completedSinZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
simp_rw [Int.sign_zero, Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, zero_div, add_zero, abs_neg,
Int.sign_neg, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, ← add_div] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_right_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | h
· simp
simp_rw [Int.sign_natCast_of_ne_zero h, Int.cast_one, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
simp only [← mul_div_assoc, push_cast, mul_assoc (Gammaℝ _), ← mul_add]
congr 3
rw [mul_one, mul_neg_one, neg_neg, neg_mul I, ← sub_eq_neg_add, ← mul_sub, mul_comm,
mul_neg, neg_mul]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-- Formula for `completedHurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range. -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2)
(completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
let r (n : ℤ) : ℝ := n + a
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := 1 / 2
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * r n * rexp (-π * (r n) ^ 2 * t))
(oddKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_ofReal.mpr (hasSum_int_oddKernel a ht)).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp [r, c, push_cast, div_mul_eq_mul_div, -one_div]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |r i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [c, ← mul_one_div ‖_‖]
apply Summable.mul_left
rwa [summable_one_div_int_add_rpow]
have := mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp only [r, c, mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_right_comm]
/-!
## Non-completed zeta functions
-/
/-- The odd part of the Hurwitz zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `1 / 2 * ∑' (n : ℤ), sign (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s` -/
noncomputable def hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma hurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
hurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -hurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp_rw [hurwitzZetaOdd, completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg, neg_div]
/-- The odd Hurwitz zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiable_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (hurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
(differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- The sine zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`. -/
noncomputable def sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedSinZeta a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma sinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
sinZeta (-a) s = -sinZeta a s := by
simp_rw [sinZeta, completedSinZeta_neg, neg_div]
/-- The sine zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiableAt_sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (sinZeta a) :=
(differentiable_completedSinZeta a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range (sum over `ℤ`). -/
theorem hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ _)).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
have : 0 < re (s + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
simp [div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos this)]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version with absolute values) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s
- SignType.sign (n + 1 - a) / (↑|n + 1 - a| : ℂ) ^ s) / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine (hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd a hs).nat_add_neg_add_one.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, sub_div, sub_eq_add_neg, Int.cast_natCast]
have : -(n + 1) + a = -(n + 1 - a) := by ring_nf
| rw [this, Left.sign_neg, abs_neg, SignType.coe_neg, neg_div, neg_div]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version without absolute values, assuming `a ∈ Icc 0 1`) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd_of_mem_Icc {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Icc 0 1) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 493 | 497 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker, Devon Tuma, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
/-!
# Uniform distributions and probability mass functions
This file defines two related notions of uniform distributions, which will be unified in the future.
# Uniform distributions
Defines the uniform distribution for any set with finite measure.
## Main definitions
* `IsUniform X s ℙ μ` : A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` under `ℙ` if the
push-forward measure agrees with the rescaled restricted measure `μ`.
# Uniform probability mass functions
This file defines a number of uniform `PMF` distributions from various inputs,
uniformly drawing from the corresponding object.
## Main definitions
`PMF.uniformOfFinset` gives each element in the set equal probability,
with `0` probability for elements not in the set.
`PMF.uniformOfFintype` gives all elements equal probability,
equal to the inverse of the size of the `Fintype`.
`PMF.ofMultiset` draws randomly from the given `Multiset`, treating duplicate values as distinct.
Each probability is given by the count of the element divided by the size of the `Multiset`
## TODO
* Refactor the `PMF` definitions to come from a `uniformMeasure` on a `Finset`/`Fintype`/`Multiset`.
-/
open scoped Finset MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
/-- A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` if its push-forward measure is
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem isProbabilityMeasure {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ :=
⟨by
have : X ⁻¹' Set.univ = Set.univ := Set.preimage_univ
rw [← this, hu.measure_preimage hns hnt MeasurableSet.univ, Set.inter_univ,
ENNReal.div_self hns hnt]⟩
theorem toMeasurable_iff {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ ↔ IsUniform X s ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform
| rw [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
protected theorem toMeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 95 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Additive energy
This file defines the additive energy of two finsets of a group. This is a central quantity in
additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.addEnergy`: The additive energy of two finsets in an additive group.
* `Finset.mulEnergy`: The multiplicative energy of two finsets in a group.
## Notation
The following notations are defined in the `Combinatorics.Additive` scope:
* `E[s, t]` for `Finset.addEnergy s t`.
* `Eₘ[s, t]` for `Finset.mulEnergy s t`.
* `E[s]` for `E[s, s]`.
* `Eₘ[s]` for `Eₘ[s, s]`.
## TODO
It's possibly interesting to have
`(s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter (fun x : (α × α) × α × α ↦ x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2)`
(whose `card` is `mulEnergy s t`) as a standalone definition.
-/
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
namespace Finset
section Mul
variable [Mul α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Finset α}
/-- The multiplicative energy `Eₘ[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`.
The notation `Eₘ[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive energy `E[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`.
The notation `E[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`."]
def mulEnergy (s t : Finset α) : ℕ :=
(((s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter fun x : (α × α) × α × α => x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2).card
/-- The multiplicative energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s t
/-- The additive energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.addEnergy s t
/-- The multiplicative energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s s
/-- The additive energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s "]" => Finset.addEnergy s s
open scoped Combinatorics.Additive
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma mulEnergy_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t₂] := by
unfold mulEnergy; gcongr
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t] :=
mulEnergy_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s, t₂] :=
mulEnergy_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[to_additive] lemma le_mulEnergy : s.card * t.card ≤ Eₘ[s, t] := by
rw [← card_product]
refine
card_le_card_of_injOn (@fun x => ((x.1, x.1), x.2, x.2)) (by simp) fun a _ b _ => ?_
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, and_self_iff, and_imp]
exact Prod.ext
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_pos (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] :=
(mul_pos hs.card_pos ht.card_pos).trans_le le_mulEnergy
variable (s t)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_left : Eₘ[∅, t] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_right : Eₘ[s, ∅] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
variable {s t}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_pos_iff : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty where
mp h := of_not_not fun H => by
simp_rw [not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at H
obtain rfl | rfl := H <;> simp [Nat.not_lt_zero] at h
mpr h := mulEnergy_pos h.1 h.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_eq_zero_iff : Eₘ[s, t] = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp [← (Nat.zero_le _).not_gt_iff_eq, not_and_or, imp_iff_or_not, or_comm]
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_card_filter (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = (((s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ s ×ˢ t).filter fun ((a, b), c, d) ↦ a * b = c * d).card :=
card_equiv (.prodProdProdComm _ _ _ _) (by simp [and_and_and_comm])
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq' (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a ∈ s * t, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mulEnergy_eq_card_filter, sq, ← card_product]
rw [← card_disjiUnion]
-- The `swap`, `ext` and `simp` calls significantly reduce heartbeats
swap
· simp only [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, coe_mul, ne_eq, disjoint_left, mem_product,
mem_filter, not_and, and_imp, Prod.forall]
aesop
· congr
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, disjiUnion_eq_biUnion, mem_biUnion]
aesop (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq [Fintype α] (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
rw [mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq']
exact Fintype.sum_subset <| by aesop (add simp [filter_eq_empty_iff, mul_mem_mul])
@[to_additive card_sq_le_card_mul_addEnergy]
lemma card_sq_le_card_mul_mulEnergy (s t u : Finset α) :
| ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b ∈ u).card ^ 2 ≤ u.card * Eₘ[s, t] := by
calc
_ = (∑ c ∈ u, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card) ^ 2 := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/Energy.lean | 136 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Paul A. Reichert. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul A. Reichert
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Convex bodies
This file contains the definition of the type `ConvexBody V`
consisting of
convex, compact, nonempty subsets of a real topological vector space `V`.
`ConvexBody V` is a module over the nonnegative reals (`NNReal`) and a pseudo-metric space.
If `V` is a normed space, `ConvexBody V` is a metric space.
## TODO
- define positive convex bodies, requiring the interior to be nonempty
- introduce support sets
- Characterise the interaction of the distance with algebraic operations, eg
`dist (a • K) (a • L) = ‖a‖ * dist K L`, `dist (a +ᵥ K) (a +ᵥ L) = dist K L`
## Tags
convex, convex body
-/
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
variable {V : Type*}
/-- Let `V` be a real topological vector space. A subset of `V` is a convex body if and only if
it is convex, compact, and nonempty.
-/
structure ConvexBody (V : Type*) [TopologicalSpace V] [AddCommMonoid V] [SMul ℝ V] where
/-- The **carrier set** underlying a convex body: the set of points contained in it -/
carrier : Set V
/-- A convex body has convex carrier set -/
convex' : Convex ℝ carrier
/-- A convex body has compact carrier set -/
isCompact' : IsCompact carrier
/-- A convex body has non-empty carrier set -/
nonempty' : carrier.Nonempty
namespace ConvexBody
section TVS
variable [TopologicalSpace V] [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℝ V]
instance : SetLike (ConvexBody V) V where
coe := ConvexBody.carrier
coe_injective' K L h := by
cases K
cases L
congr
protected theorem convex (K : ConvexBody V) : Convex ℝ (K : Set V) :=
K.convex'
protected theorem isCompact (K : ConvexBody V) : IsCompact (K : Set V) :=
K.isCompact'
protected theorem isClosed [T2Space V] (K : ConvexBody V) : IsClosed (K : Set V) :=
K.isCompact.isClosed
protected theorem nonempty (K : ConvexBody V) : (K : Set V).Nonempty :=
K.nonempty'
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {K L : ConvexBody V} (h : (K : Set V) = L) : K = L :=
SetLike.ext' h
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (s : Set V) (h₁ h₂ h₃) : (mk s h₁ h₂ h₃ : Set V) = s :=
rfl
/-- A convex body that is symmetric contains `0`. -/
theorem zero_mem_of_symmetric (K : ConvexBody V) (h_symm : ∀ x ∈ K, -x ∈ K) : 0 ∈ K := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := K.nonempty
rw [show 0 = (1/2 : ℝ) • x + (1/2 : ℝ) • (- x) by field_simp]
apply convex_iff_forall_pos.mp K.convex hx (h_symm x hx)
all_goals linarith
section ContinuousAdd
instance : Zero (ConvexBody V) where
zero := ⟨0, convex_singleton 0, isCompact_singleton, Set.singleton_nonempty 0⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note: add norm_cast; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ConvexBody V) : Set V) = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ConvexBody V) :=
⟨0⟩
variable [ContinuousAdd V]
instance : Add (ConvexBody V) where
add K L :=
⟨K + L, K.convex.add L.convex, K.isCompact.add L.isCompact,
K.nonempty.add L.nonempty⟩
instance : SMul ℕ (ConvexBody V) where
smul := nsmulRec
-- Porting note: add @[simp, norm_cast]; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_nsmul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (K : ConvexBody V), ↑(n • K) = n • (K : Set V)
| 0, _ => rfl
| (n + 1), K => congr_arg₂ (Set.image2 (· + ·)) (coe_nsmul n K) rfl
instance : AddMonoid (ConvexBody V) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ coe_nsmul _ _
@[simp] -- Porting note: add norm_cast; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_add (K L : ConvexBody V) : (↑(K + L) : Set V) = (K : Set V) + L :=
rfl
instance : AddCommMonoid (ConvexBody V) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ coe_nsmul _ _
end ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousSMul ℝ V]
instance : SMul ℝ (ConvexBody V) where
smul c K := ⟨c • (K : Set V), K.convex.smul _, K.isCompact.smul _, K.nonempty.smul_set⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note: add norm_cast; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_smul (c : ℝ) (K : ConvexBody V) : (↑(c • K) : Set V) = c • (K : Set V) :=
rfl
variable [ContinuousAdd V]
instance : DistribMulAction ℝ (ConvexBody V) :=
SetLike.coe_injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨_, coe_zero⟩, coe_add⟩ coe_smul
@[simp] -- Porting note: add norm_cast; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_smul' (c : ℝ≥0) (K : ConvexBody V) : (↑(c • K) : Set V) = c • (K : Set V) :=
rfl
/-- The convex bodies in a fixed space $V$ form a module over the nonnegative reals.
-/
instance : Module ℝ≥0 (ConvexBody V) where
add_smul c d K := SetLike.ext' <| Convex.add_smul K.convex c.coe_nonneg d.coe_nonneg
zero_smul K := SetLike.ext' <| Set.zero_smul_set K.nonempty
theorem smul_le_of_le (K : ConvexBody V) (h_zero : 0 ∈ K) {a b : ℝ≥0} (h : a ≤ b) :
a • K ≤ b • K := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, coe_smul', coe_smul']
obtain rfl | ha := eq_zero_or_pos a
· rw [Set.zero_smul_set K.nonempty, Set.zero_subset]
exact Set.mem_smul_set.mpr ⟨0, h_zero, smul_zero _⟩
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := Set.mem_smul_set.mp hx
rw [← Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ ha.ne', smul_smul]
refine Convex.mem_smul_of_zero_mem K.convex h_zero hy (?_ : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ * b)
rwa [le_inv_mul_iff₀ ha, mul_one]
end TVS
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] (K L : ConvexBody V)
protected theorem isBounded : Bornology.IsBounded (K : Set V) :=
K.isCompact.isBounded
theorem hausdorffEdist_ne_top {K L : ConvexBody V} : EMetric.hausdorffEdist (K : Set V) L ≠ ⊤ := by
apply_rules [Metric.hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded, ConvexBody.nonempty,
ConvexBody.isBounded]
/-- Convex bodies in a fixed seminormed space $V$ form a pseudo-metric space under the Hausdorff
metric. -/
noncomputable instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ConvexBody V) where
dist K L := Metric.hausdorffDist (K : Set V) L
dist_self _ := Metric.hausdorffDist_self_zero
dist_comm _ _ := Metric.hausdorffDist_comm
dist_triangle _ _ _ := Metric.hausdorffDist_triangle hausdorffEdist_ne_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem hausdorffDist_coe : Metric.hausdorffDist (K : Set V) L = dist K L :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem hausdorffEdist_coe : EMetric.hausdorffEdist (K : Set V) L = edist K L := by
rw [edist_dist]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_toReal hausdorffEdist_ne_top).symm
open Filter
/-- Let `K` be a convex body that contains `0` and let `u n` be a sequence of nonnegative real
numbers that tends to `0`. Then the intersection of the dilated bodies `(1 + u n) • K` is equal
to `K`. -/
theorem iInter_smul_eq_self [T2Space V] {u : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (K : ConvexBody V) (h_zero : 0 ∈ K)
(hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0)) :
⋂ n : ℕ, (1 + (u n : ℝ)) • (K : Set V) = K := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨C, hC_pos, hC_bdd⟩ := K.isBounded.exists_pos_norm_le
rw [← K.isClosed.closure_eq, SeminormedAddCommGroup.mem_closure_iff]
| rw [← NNReal.tendsto_coe, NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_atTop] at hu
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hu (ε / C) (div_pos hε hC_pos)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Body.lean | 207 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HomeomorphBall
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.WithLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.WithLp
/-!
# Calculus in inner product spaces
In this file we prove that the inner product and square of the norm in an inner space are
infinitely `ℝ`-smooth. In order to state these results, we need a `NormedSpace ℝ E`
instance. Though we can deduce this structure from `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E`, this instance may be
not definitionally equal to some other “natural” instance. So, we assume `[NormedSpace ℝ E]`.
We also prove that functions to a `EuclideanSpace` are (higher) differentiable if and only if
their components are. This follows from the corresponding fact for finite product of normed spaces,
and from the equivalence of norms in finite dimensions.
## TODO
The last part of the file should be generalized to `PiLp`.
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
section DerivInner
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
variable (𝕜) [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Derivative of the inner product. -/
def fderivInnerCLM (p : E × E) : E × E →L[ℝ] 𝕜 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.deriv p
@[simp]
theorem fderivInnerCLM_apply (p x : E × E) : fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 p x = ⟪p.1, x.2⟫ + ⟪x.1, p.2⟫ :=
rfl
variable {𝕜}
theorem contDiff_inner {n} : ContDiff ℝ n fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.contDiff
theorem contDiffAt_inner {p : E × E} {n} : ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) p :=
ContDiff.contDiffAt contDiff_inner
theorem differentiable_inner : Differentiable ℝ fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.differentiableAt
variable (𝕜)
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G] {f g : G → E} {f' g' : G →L[ℝ] E}
{s : Set G} {x : G} {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.inner (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
contDiffAt_inner.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf.prodMk hg)
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.inner (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
hf.inner 𝕜 hg
theorem ContDiffOn.inner (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inner 𝕜 (hg x hx)
theorem ContDiff.inner (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫ :=
contDiff_inner.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to handle a unification issue. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') s
x := by
exact isBoundedBilinearMap_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)
|>.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x) |>.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)
|>.hasStrictFDerivAt (f x, g x) |>.comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to handle a unification issue. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x := by
exact isBoundedBilinearMap_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)
|>.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x) |>.comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) s x := by
simpa using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {x : ℝ} :
HasDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt g g' x →
HasDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) x := by
simpa only [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] using HasDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.inner (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.inner (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.inner (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℝ g s) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inner 𝕜 (hg x hx)
theorem Differentiable.inner (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hg : Differentiable ℝ g) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫ := fun x => (hf x).inner 𝕜 (hg x)
theorem fderiv_inner_apply (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) (y : G) :
fderiv ℝ (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) x y = ⟪f x, fderiv ℝ g x y⟫ + ⟪fderiv ℝ f x y, g x⟫ := by
rw [(hf.hasFDerivAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv]; rfl
theorem deriv_inner_apply {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) :
deriv (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) x = ⟪f x, deriv g x⟫ + ⟪deriv f x, g x⟫ :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasDerivAt).deriv
section
include 𝕜
theorem contDiff_norm_sq : ContDiff ℝ n fun x : E => ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
convert (reCLM : 𝕜 →L[ℝ] ℝ).contDiff.comp ((contDiff_id (E := E)).inner 𝕜 (contDiff_id (E := E)))
exact (inner_self_eq_norm_sq _).symm
theorem ContDiff.norm_sq (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) : ContDiff ℝ n fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2 :=
(contDiff_norm_sq 𝕜).comp hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s x :=
(contDiff_norm_sq 𝕜).contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) : ContDiffAt ℝ n (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) x :=
hf.norm_sq 𝕜
theorem contDiffAt_norm {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ContDiffAt ℝ n norm x := by
have : ‖id x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero 2 (norm_pos_iff.2 hx).ne'
simpa only [id, sqrt_sq, norm_nonneg] using (contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).sqrt this
theorem ContDiffAt.norm (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) x :=
(contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).comp x hf
theorem ContDiffAt.dist (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]
exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.norm (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) s x :=
(contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.dist (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]; exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
theorem ContDiffOn.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) : ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s :=
fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm_sq 𝕜
theorem ContDiffOn.norm (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm 𝕜 (h0 x hx)
theorem ContDiffOn.dist (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s)
(hne : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ g x) : ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).dist 𝕜 (hg x hx) (hne x hx)
theorem ContDiff.norm (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : ContDiff ℝ n fun y => ‖f y‖ :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.norm 𝕜 (h0 x)
theorem ContDiff.dist (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) (hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun y => dist (f y) (g y) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.dist 𝕜 hg.contDiffAt (hne x)
end
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq (x : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => ‖x‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ x)) x := by
simp only [sq, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ]
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x).inner ℝ (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x)
ext y
simp [two_smul, real_inner_comm]
theorem HasFDerivAt.norm_sq {f : G → F} {f' : G →L[ℝ] F} (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ (f x)).comp f') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq _).hasFDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.norm_sq {f : ℝ → F} {f' : F} {x : ℝ} (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 * Inner.inner (f x) f') x := by
simpa using hf.hasFDerivAt.norm_sq.hasDerivAt
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.norm_sq {f : G → F} {f' : G →L[ℝ] F} (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ (f x)).comp f') s x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq _).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.norm_sq {f : ℝ → F} {f' : F} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 * Inner.inner (f x) f') s x := by
simpa using hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.norm_sq.hasDerivWithinAt
section
include 𝕜
theorem DifferentiableAt.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.norm (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖) x :=
((contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.dist (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]; exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
theorem Differentiable.norm_sq (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) : Differentiable ℝ fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2 :=
fun x => (hf x).norm_sq 𝕜
theorem Differentiable.norm (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable ℝ fun y => ‖f y‖ := fun x => (hf x).norm 𝕜 (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.dist (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hg : Differentiable ℝ g)
(hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) : Differentiable ℝ fun y => dist (f y) (g y) := fun x =>
(hf x).dist 𝕜 (hg x) (hne x)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp_differentiableWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.norm (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖) s x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm 𝕜 h0).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp_differentiableWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.dist (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ g s x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]
| exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
theorem DifferentiableOn.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Calculus.lean | 253 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
/-!
# fintype instance for the product of two fintypes.
-/
open Function
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
theorem toFinset_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] [Fintype (s ×ˢ t)] :
(s ×ˢ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ×ˢ t.toFinset := by
ext
simp
theorem toFinset_off_diag {s : Set α} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] [Fintype s.offDiag] :
s.offDiag.toFinset = s.toFinset.offDiag :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
end Set
instance instFintypeProd (α β : Type*) [Fintype α] [Fintype β] : Fintype (α × β) :=
⟨univ ×ˢ univ, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp⟩
namespace Finset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β}
@[simp] lemma univ_product_univ : univ ×ˢ univ = (univ : Finset (α × β)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma product_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
end Finset
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_prod (α β : Type*) [Fintype α] [Fintype β] :
Fintype.card (α × β) = Fintype.card α * Fintype.card β :=
card_product _ _
section
@[simp]
theorem infinite_prod : Infinite (α × β) ↔ Infinite α ∧ Nonempty β ∨ Nonempty α ∧ Infinite β := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H =>
H.elim (and_imp.2 <| @Prod.infinite_of_left α β) (and_imp.2 <| @Prod.infinite_of_right α β)⟩
rw [and_comm]; contrapose! H; intro H'
rcases Infinite.nonempty (α × β) with ⟨a, b⟩
haveI := fintypeOfNotInfinite (H.1 ⟨b⟩); haveI := fintypeOfNotInfinite (H.2 ⟨a⟩)
exact H'.false
instance Pi.infinite_of_left {ι : Sort*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nontrivial <| π i] [Infinite ι] :
| Infinite (∀ i : ι, π i) := by
classical
choose m n hm using fun i => exists_pair_ne (π i)
refine Infinite.of_injective (fun i => update m i (n i)) fun x y h => of_not_not fun hne => ?_
simp_rw [update_eq_iff, update_of_ne hne] at h
exact (hm x h.1.symm).elim
/-- If at least one `π i` is infinite and the rest nonempty, the pi type of all `π` is infinite. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Prod.lean | 69 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
| theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 449 | 450 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCocycles A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCocycles A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCocycles A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f g⁻¹) = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_cancel g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles (x : A) :
dZero A x ∈ oneCocycles A :=
congr($(dOne_comp_dZero A) x)
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
f (g * h) = f g + f h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ofMul_mul, map_add,
oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f (Additive.ofMul h)),
add_comm (f (Additive.ofMul g))]
variable (A) in
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `Z¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
@[simps] def oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial [hA : A.IsTrivial] :
oneCocycles A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ Additive.toMul
map_zero' := oneCocycles_map_one f
map_add' := oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial f }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f :=
{ val := f
property := mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom f }
left_inv f := by ext; rfl
right_inv f := by ext; rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCocycles A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCocycles A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : twoCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCocycles A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
theorem mem_twoCocycles_def (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) - f (g * h, j) + f (g, h * j) - f (g, h) = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dTwo_apply, Prod.mk.eta, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_twoCocycles_iff (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) =
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j) := by
simp_rw [mem_twoCocycles_def, sub_eq_zero, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_comm,
add_comm (f (_ * _, _))]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_fst (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
have := ((mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 1 1 g).symm
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, one_mul, add_right_inj, this]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_snd (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = A.ρ g (f (1, 1)) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g 1 1
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj, this]
lemma twoCocycles_ρ_map_inv_sub_map_inv (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f (g⁻¹, g)) - f (g, g⁻¹)
= f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, twoCocycles_map_one_fst _ g]
at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
theorem dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles (x : G → A) :
dOne A x ∈ twoCocycles A :=
congr($(dTwo_comp_dOne A) x)
end Cocycles
section Coboundaries
/-- The 1-coboundaries `B¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`A → Fun(G, A)` sending `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
def oneCoboundaries : Submodule k (G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dZero A)
/-- The 2-coboundaries `B²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def twoCoboundaries : Submodule k (G × G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dOne A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCoboundaries A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCoboundaries A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : oneCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
variable (A) in
lemma oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A ≤ oneCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B¹(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z¹(G, A)`. -/
abbrev oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] oneCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles_apply (x : oneCoboundaries A) :
oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
theorem oneCoboundaries_eq_bot_of_isTrivial (A : Rep k G) [A.IsTrivial] :
oneCoboundaries A = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [oneCoboundaries, dZero_eq_zero]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_bot.2 rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCoboundaries A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCoboundaries A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : twoCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) :
f₁ = f₂ :=
| DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
variable (A) in
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 419 | 421 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Abel's limit theorem
If a real or complex power series for a function has radius of convergence 1 and the series is only
known to converge conditionally at 1, Abel's limit theorem gives the value at 1 as the limit of the
function at 1 from the left. "Left" for complex numbers means within a fixed cone opening to the
left with angle less than `π`.
## Main theorems
* `Complex.tendsto_tsum_powerSeries_nhdsWithin_stolzCone`:
Abel's limit theorem for complex power series.
* `Real.tendsto_tsum_powerSeries_nhdsWithin_lt`: Abel's limit theorem for real power series.
## References
* https://planetmath.org/proofofabelslimittheorem
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%27s_theorem
-/
open Filter Finset
open scoped Topology
namespace Complex
section StolzSet
open Real
/-- The Stolz set for a given `M`, roughly teardrop-shaped with the tip at 1 but tending to the
open unit disc as `M` tends to infinity. -/
def stolzSet (M : ℝ) : Set ℂ := {z | ‖z‖ < 1 ∧ ‖1 - z‖ < M * (1 - ‖z‖)}
/-- The cone to the left of `1` with angle `2θ` such that `tan θ = s`. -/
def stolzCone (s : ℝ) : Set ℂ := {z | |z.im| < s * (1 - z.re)}
theorem stolzSet_empty {M : ℝ} (hM : M ≤ 1) : stolzSet M = ∅ := by
ext z
rw [stolzSet, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and, not_lt, ← sub_pos]
intro zn
calc
_ ≤ 1 * (1 - ‖z‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hM zn.le
_ = ‖(1 : ℂ)‖ - ‖z‖ := by rw [one_mul, norm_one]
_ ≤ _ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
theorem nhdsWithin_lt_le_nhdsWithin_stolzSet {M : ℝ} (hM : 1 < M) :
(𝓝[<] 1).map ofReal ≤ 𝓝[stolzSet M] 1 := by
rw [← tendsto_id']
refine tendsto_map' <| tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within ofReal
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds <| ofRealCLM.continuous.tendsto' 1 1 rfl) ?_
simp only [eventually_iff, mem_nhdsWithin]
refine ⟨Set.Ioo 0 2, isOpen_Ioo, by norm_num, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_Ioo, Set.mem_Iio] at hx
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, stolzSet, ← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_sub, norm_real,
norm_of_nonneg hx.1.1.le, norm_of_nonneg <| (sub_pos.mpr hx.2).le]
exact ⟨hx.2, lt_mul_left (sub_pos.mpr hx.2) hM⟩
-- An ugly technical lemma
private lemma stolzCone_subset_stolzSet_aux' (s : ℝ) :
∃ M ε, 0 < M ∧ 0 < ε ∧ ∀ x y, 0 < x → x < ε → |y| < s * x →
sqrt (x ^ 2 + y ^ 2) < M * (1 - sqrt ((1 - x) ^ 2 + y ^ 2)) := by
refine ⟨2 * sqrt (1 + s ^ 2) + 1, 1 / (1 + s ^ 2), by positivity, by positivity,
fun x y hx₀ hx₁ hy ↦ ?_⟩
have H : sqrt ((1 - x) ^ 2 + y ^ 2) ≤ 1 - x / 2 := by
calc sqrt ((1 - x) ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
_ ≤ sqrt ((1 - x) ^ 2 + (s * x) ^ 2) := sqrt_le_sqrt <| by rw [← sq_abs y]; gcongr
_ = sqrt (1 - 2 * x + (1 + s ^ 2) * x * x) := by congr 1; ring
_ ≤ sqrt (1 - 2 * x + (1 + s ^ 2) * (1 / (1 + s ^ 2)) * x) := sqrt_le_sqrt <| by gcongr
_ = sqrt (1 - x) := by congr 1; field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 1 - x / 2 := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_div]
refine sqrt_one_add_le <| neg_le_neg_iff.mpr (hx₁.trans_le ?_).le
rw [div_le_one (by positivity)]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| sq_nonneg s
calc sqrt (x ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
_ ≤ sqrt (x ^ 2 + (s * x) ^ 2) := sqrt_le_sqrt <| by rw [← sq_abs y]; gcongr
_ = sqrt ((1 + s ^ 2) * x ^ 2) := by congr; ring
_ = sqrt (1 + s ^ 2) * x := by rw [sqrt_mul' _ (sq_nonneg x), sqrt_sq hx₀.le]
_ = 2 * sqrt (1 + s ^ 2) * (x / 2) := by ring
_ < (2 * sqrt (1 + s ^ 2) + 1) * (x / 2) := by gcongr; exact lt_add_one _
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr; exact le_sub_comm.mpr H
lemma stolzCone_subset_stolzSet_aux {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
∃ M ε, 0 < M ∧ 0 < ε ∧ {z : ℂ | 1 - ε < z.re} ∩ stolzCone s ⊆ stolzSet M := by
peel stolzCone_subset_stolzSet_aux' s with M ε hM hε H
rintro z ⟨hzl, hzr⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, sub_lt_comm, ← one_re, ← sub_re] at hzl
rw [stolzCone, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← one_re, ← sub_re] at hzr
replace H :=
H (1 - z).re z.im ((mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left hs).mp <| (abs_nonneg z.im).trans_lt hzr) hzl hzr
have h : z.im ^ 2 = (1 - z).im ^ 2 := by
simp only [sub_im, one_im, zero_sub, even_two, neg_sq]
rw [h, ← norm_eq_sqrt_sq_add_sq, ← h, sub_re, one_re, sub_sub_cancel,
← norm_eq_sqrt_sq_add_sq] at H
exact ⟨sub_pos.mp <| (mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left hM).mp <| (norm_nonneg _).trans_lt H, H⟩
lemma nhdsWithin_stolzCone_le_nhdsWithin_stolzSet {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
| ∃ M, 𝓝[stolzCone s] 1 ≤ 𝓝[stolzSet M] 1 := by
obtain ⟨M, ε, _, hε, H⟩ := stolzCone_subset_stolzSet_aux hs
use M
rw [nhdsWithin_le_iff, mem_nhdsWithin]
refine ⟨{w | 1 - ε < w.re}, isOpen_lt continuous_const continuous_re, ?_, H⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, one_re, sub_lt_self_iff, hε]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/AbelLimit.lean | 110 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).natDegree = #s - 1 := by
have H : ∀ j, j ∈ s.erase i → basisDivisor (v i) (v j) ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Ne, mem_erase, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact fun j ⟨hij₁, hj⟩ hij₂ => hij₁ (hvs hj hi hij₂.symm)
rw [← card_erase_of_mem hi, card_eq_sum_ones]
convert natDegree_prod _ _ H using 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => (natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne ?_).symm
rw [Ne, ← basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact H _ hj
theorem degree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).degree = ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree (basis_ne_zero hvs hi), natDegree_basis hvs hi]
theorem sum_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∑ j ∈ s, Lagrange.basis s v j = 1 := by
refine eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #s)]
intro i hi
rw [degree_basis hvs hi, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.pred_lt (card_ne_zero_of_mem hi)
· rw [degree_one, ← WithBot.coe_zero, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nonempty.card_pos hs
· intro i hi
rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_one, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi, eval_basis_self hvs hi,
add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi]
theorem basisDivisor_add_symm {x y : F} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
basisDivisor x y + basisDivisor y x = 1 := by
classical
rw [← sum_basis Function.injective_id.injOn ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ {y}⟩,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hxy), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hxy,
basis_pair_right hxy, id, id]
end Basis
section Interpolate
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s t : Finset ι} {i j : ι} {v : ι → F} (r r' : ι → F)
open Finset
/-- Lagrange interpolation: given a finset `s : Finset ι`, a nodal map `v : ι → F` injective on
`s` and a value function `r : ι → F`, `interpolate s v r` is the unique
polynomial of degree `< #s` that takes value `r i` on `v i` for all `i` in `s`. -/
@[simps]
def interpolate (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) : (ι → F) →ₗ[F] F[X] where
toFun r := ∑ i ∈ s, C (r i) * Lagrange.basis s v i
map_add' f g := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have h : (fun x => C (f x) * Lagrange.basis s v x + C (g x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) =
(fun x => C ((f + g) x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) := by
simp_rw [← add_mul, ← C_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [h]
map_smul' c f := by
simp_rw [Finset.smul_sum, C_mul', smul_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem interpolate_empty : interpolate ∅ v r = 0 := by rw [interpolate_apply, sum_empty]
theorem interpolate_singleton : interpolate {i} v r = C (r i) := by
rw [interpolate_apply, sum_singleton, basis_singleton, mul_one]
theorem interpolate_one (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : interpolate s v 1 = 1 := by
simp_rw [interpolate_apply, Pi.one_apply, map_one, one_mul]
exact sum_basis hvs hs
theorem eval_interpolate_at_node (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
eval (v i) (interpolate s v r) = r i := by
rw [interpolate_apply, eval_finset_sum, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi]
simp_rw [eval_mul, eval_C, eval_basis_self hvs hi, mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basis_of_ne (mem_erase.mp H).1 hi, mul_zero]
theorem degree_interpolate_le (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(interpolate s v r).degree ≤ ↑(#s - 1) := by
refine (degree_sum_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro i hi
rw [degree_mul, degree_basis hvs hi]
by_cases hr : r i = 0
· simpa only [hr, map_zero, degree_zero, WithBot.bot_add] using bot_le
· rw [degree_C hr, zero_add]
theorem degree_interpolate_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : (interpolate s v r).degree < #s := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h)
· rw [interpolate_empty, degree_zero, card_empty]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_interpolate_le _ hvs) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.sub_lt (Nonempty.card_pos h) zero_lt_one
theorem degree_interpolate_erase_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(interpolate (s.erase i) v r).degree < ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [← Finset.card_erase_of_mem hi]
exact degree_interpolate_lt _ (Set.InjOn.mono (coe_subset.mpr (erase_subset _ _)) hvs)
theorem values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(hrr' : interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r') : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i := fun _ hi => by
rw [← eval_interpolate_at_node r hvs hi, hrr', eval_interpolate_at_node r' hvs hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on (hrr' : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi => by rw [hrr' _ hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_iff_values_eq_on (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i :=
⟨values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq _ _ hvs, interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _⟩
theorem eq_interpolate {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) :
f = interpolate s v fun i => f.eval (v i) :=
eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs degree_f_lt (degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs) fun _ hi =>
(eval_interpolate_at_node (fun x ↦ eval (v x) f) hvs hi).symm
theorem eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = r i) : f = interpolate s v r := by
rw [eq_interpolate hvs degree_f_lt]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ eval_f
/-- This is the characteristic property of the interpolation: the interpolation is the
unique polynomial of `degree < Fintype.card ι` which takes the value of the `r i` on the `v i`.
-/
theorem eq_interpolate_iff {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(f.degree < #s ∧ ∀ i ∈ s, eval (v i) f = r i) ↔ f = interpolate s v r := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvs h.1 h.2
· rw [h]
exact ⟨degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs, fun _ hi => eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi⟩
/-- Lagrange interpolation induces isomorphism between functions from `s`
and polynomials of degree less than `Fintype.card ι`. -/
def funEquivDegreeLT (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : degreeLT F #s ≃ₗ[F] s → F where
toFun f i := f.1.eval (v i)
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ => eval_add
map_smul' c f := funext <| by simp
invFun r :=
⟨interpolate s v fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then r ⟨x, hx⟩ else 0,
mem_degreeLT.2 <| degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
| simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, dite_eq_ite]
rw [mem_degreeLT] at hf
conv => rhs; rw [eq_interpolate hvs hf]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 382 | 384 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jiale Miao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jiale Miao, Kevin Buzzard, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
/-!
# Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization
In this file we introduce Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization.
The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span.
## Main results
- `gramSchmidt` : the Gram-Schmidt process
- `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` :
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors.
- `span_gramSchmidt` :
`gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors.
- `gramSchmidt_ne_zero` :
If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero.
- `gramSchmidt_basis` :
The basis produced by the Gram-Schmidt process when given a basis as input.
- `gramSchmidtNormed` :
the normalized `gramSchmidt` (i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.)
- `gramSchmidt_orthonormal` :
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors.
- `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis`: orthonormal basis constructed by the Gram-Schmidt process from
an indexed set of vectors of the right size
-/
open Finset Submodule Module
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [WellFoundedLT ι]
attribute [local instance] IsWellOrder.toHasWellFounded
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidt [WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
f n - ∑ i : Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt f i).orthogonalProjection (f n)
termination_by n
decreasing_by exact mem_Iio.1 i.2
/-- This lemma uses `∑ i in` instead of `∑ i :`. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_def (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n = f n - ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [← sum_attach, attach_eq_univ, gramSchmidt]
theorem gramSchmidt_def' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, sub_add_cancel]
theorem gramSchmidt_def'' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n,
(⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i, f n⟫ / (‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i := by
convert gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f n
rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton, RCLike.ofReal_pow]
@[simp]
theorem gramSchmidt_zero {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrder ι] [OrderBot ι]
[WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f ⊥ = f ⊥ := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, Iio_eq_Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, sub_zero]
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation**:
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthogonal (f : ι → E) {a b : ι} (h₀ : a ≠ b) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := by
suffices ∀ a b : ι, a < b → ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 by
rcases h₀.lt_or_lt with ha | hb
· exact this _ _ ha
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact this _ _ hb
clear h₀ a b
intro a b h₀
revert a
apply wellFounded_lt.induction b
intro b ih a h₀
simp only [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f b, inner_sub_right, inner_sum, orthogonalProjection_singleton,
inner_smul_right]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem a (Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h₀)]
· by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a = 0
· simp only [h, inner_zero_left, zero_div, zero_mul, sub_zero]
· rw [RCLike.ofReal_pow, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, div_mul_cancel₀, sub_self]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
intro i hi hia
simp only [mul_eq_zero, div_eq_zero_iff, inner_self_eq_zero]
right
rcases hia.lt_or_lt with hia₁ | hia₂
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact ih a h₀ i hia₁
· exact ih i (mem_Iio.1 hi) a hia₂
/-- This is another version of `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` using `Pairwise` instead. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_pairwise_orthogonal (f : ι → E) :
Pairwise fun a b => ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
theorem gramSchmidt_inv_triangular (v : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 v j, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def'' 𝕜 v]
simp only [inner_add_right, inner_sum, inner_smul_right]
set b : ι → E := gramSchmidt 𝕜 v
convert zero_add (0 : 𝕜)
· exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v hij.ne'
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro k hki'
| have hki : k < i := by simpa using hki'
have : ⟪b j, b k⟫ = 0 := gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v (hki.trans hij).ne'
simp [this]
open Submodule Set Order
theorem mem_span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hij)
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => smul_mem (span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j)) _ <|
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/GramSchmidtOrtho.lean | 117 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `Function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `Function.mulSupport f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α β A B M M' N P G : Type*}
section One
variable [One M] [One N] [One P]
/-- `mulSupport` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
def mulSupport (f : α → M) : Set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_preimage (f : α → M) : mulSupport f = f ⁻¹' {1}ᶜ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nmem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∉ mulSupport f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
@[to_additive]
theorem compl_mulSupport {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f)ᶜ = { x | f x = 1 } :=
ext fun _ => nmem_mulSupport
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∈ mulSupport f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} : mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_imp_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f = s ↔ (∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≠ 1) ∧ ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 1 := by
simp +contextual only [Set.ext_iff, mem_mulSupport, ne_eq, iff_def,
not_imp_comm, and_comm, forall_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff_mulSupport {f g : α → M} :
f = g ↔ f.mulSupport = g.mulSupport ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.mulSupport, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ funext fun x ↦ by
if hx : x ∈ f.mulSupport then exact h₂ x hx
else rw [nmem_mulSupport.1 hx, nmem_mulSupport.1 (mt (Set.ext_iff.1 h₁ x).2 hx)]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_of_ne_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) {y : M} (hy : y ≠ 1) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = insert x (mulSupport f) := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) :
mulSupport (update f x 1) = mulSupport f \ {x} := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_eq_ite [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] (f : α → M) (x : α) (y : M) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = if y = 1 then mulSupport f \ {x} else insert x (mulSupport f) := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 1 with rfl | hy <;> simp [mulSupport_update_one, mulSupport_update_of_ne_one, *]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one_subset {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) ⊆ f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_subset_iff'.mpr fun x hfg ↦ by
by_cases hf : ∃ a, f a = x
· rw [extend, dif_pos hf, ← nmem_mulSupport]
rw [← Classical.choose_spec hf] at hfg
exact fun hg ↦ hfg ⟨_, hg, rfl⟩
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ hf]; rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} (hf : f.Injective) :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) = f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_extend_one_subset.antisymm <| by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; rwa [mem_mulSupport, hf.extend_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_disjoint_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint (mulSupport f) s ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by
simp_rw [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, mulSupport_subset_iff', not_mem_compl_iff, EqOn,
Pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_mulSupport_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint s (mulSupport f) ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by
rw [disjoint_comm, mulSupport_disjoint_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_eq_empty_iff {f : α → M} : mulSupport f = ∅ ↔ f = 1 := by
rw [← subset_empty_iff, mulSupport_subset_iff', funext_iff]
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_nonempty_iff {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 1 := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, mulSupport_eq_empty_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem range_subset_insert_image_mulSupport (f : α → M) :
range f ⊆ insert 1 (f '' mulSupport f) := by
simpa only [range_subset_iff, mem_insert_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left] using
fun x (hx : x ∈ mulSupport f) => mem_image_of_mem f hx
@[to_additive]
lemma range_eq_image_or_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {k : Set α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ k) :
range f = f '' k ∨ range f = insert 1 (f '' k) := by
have : range f ⊆ insert 1 (f '' k) :=
(range_subset_insert_image_mulSupport f).trans (insert_subset_insert (image_subset f h))
by_cases h1 : 1 ∈ range f
· exact Or.inr (subset_antisymm this (insert_subset h1 (image_subset_range _ _)))
refine Or.inl (subset_antisymm ?_ (image_subset_range _ _))
rwa [← diff_singleton_eq_self h1, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_one' : mulSupport (1 : α → M) = ∅ :=
mulSupport_eq_empty_iff.2 rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_one : (mulSupport fun _ : α => (1 : M)) = ∅ :=
mulSupport_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_const {c : M} (hc : c ≠ 1) : (mulSupport fun _ : α => c) = Set.univ := by
ext x
simp [hc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_binop_subset (op : M → N → P) (op1 : op 1 1 = 1) (f : α → M) (g : α → N) :
(mulSupport fun x => op (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mulSupport f ∪ mulSupport g := fun x hx =>
not_or_of_imp fun hf hg => hx <| by simp only [hf, hg, op1]
| @[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_comp_subset {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) (f : α → M) :
mulSupport (g ∘ f) ⊆ mulSupport f := fun x => mt fun h => by simp only [(· ∘ ·), *]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Support.lean | 156 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Tactic.Inhabit
/-!
# Extra facts about `Prod`
This file proves various simple lemmas about `Prod`.
It also defines better delaborators for product projections.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
namespace Prod
lemma swap_eq_iff_eq_swap {x : α × β} {y : β × α} : x.swap = y ↔ x = y.swap := by aesop
def mk.injArrow {x₁ : α} {y₁ : β} {x₂ : α} {y₂ : β} :
(x₁, y₁) = (x₂, y₂) → ∀ ⦃P : Sort*⦄, (x₁ = x₂ → y₁ = y₂ → P) → P :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ ↦ Prod.noConfusion h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem mk.eta : ∀ {p : α × β}, (p.1, p.2) = p
| (_, _) => rfl
theorem forall' {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x : α × β, p x.1 x.2) ↔ ∀ a b, p a b :=
Prod.forall
theorem exists' {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x : α × β, p x.1 x.2) ↔ ∃ a b, p a b :=
Prod.exists
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_mk (x : α) : Prod.snd ∘ (Prod.mk x : β → α × β) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_mk (x : α) : Prod.fst ∘ (Prod.mk x : β → α × β) = Function.const β x :=
rfl
attribute [mfld_simps] map_apply
-- This was previously a `simp` lemma, but no longer is on the basis that it destructures the pair.
-- See `map_apply`, `map_fst`, and `map_snd` for slightly weaker lemmas in the `simp` set.
theorem map_apply' (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) (p : α × β) : map f g p = (f p.1, g p.2) :=
rfl
theorem map_fst' (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : Prod.fst ∘ map f g = f ∘ Prod.fst :=
funext <| map_fst f g
theorem map_snd' (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : Prod.snd ∘ map f g = g ∘ Prod.snd :=
funext <| map_snd f g
theorem mk_inj {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} : (a₁, b₁) = (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-06")] alias mk.inj_iff := mk_inj
theorem mk_right_injective {α β : Type*} (a : α) : (mk a : β → α × β).Injective := by
intro b₁ b₂ h
simpa only [true_and, Prod.mk_inj, eq_self_iff_true] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-06")] alias mk.inj_left := mk_right_injective
theorem mk_left_injective {α β : Type*} (b : β) : (fun a ↦ mk a b : α → α × β).Injective := by
intro b₁ b₂ h
simpa only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, mk_inj] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-06")] alias mk.inj_right := mk_left_injective
lemma mk_right_inj {a : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} : (a, b₁) = (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ = b₂ :=
(mk_right_injective _).eq_iff
lemma mk_left_inj {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} : (a₁, b) = (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ = a₂ := (mk_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-06")] alias mk_inj_left := mk_right_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-06")] alias mk_inj_right := mk_left_inj
theorem map_def {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} : Prod.map f g = fun p : α × β ↦ (f p.1, g p.2) :=
funext fun p ↦ Prod.ext (map_fst f g p) (map_snd f g p)
theorem id_prod : (fun p : α × β ↦ (p.1, p.2)) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (g : β → β) (n : ℕ) :
(Prod.map f g)^[n] = Prod.map f^[n] g^[n] := by induction n <;> simp [*, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem fst_surjective [h : Nonempty β] : Function.Surjective (@fst α β) :=
fun x ↦ h.elim fun y ↦ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩
theorem snd_surjective [h : Nonempty α] : Function.Surjective (@snd α β) :=
fun y ↦ h.elim fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩
theorem fst_injective [Subsingleton β] : Function.Injective (@fst α β) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ Prod.ext h (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
theorem snd_injective [Subsingleton α] : Function.Injective (@snd α β) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ Prod.ext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) h
@[simp]
theorem swap_leftInverse : Function.LeftInverse (@swap α β) swap :=
swap_swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (@swap α β) swap :=
swap_swap
theorem swap_injective : Function.Injective (@swap α β) :=
swap_leftInverse.injective
theorem swap_surjective : Function.Surjective (@swap α β) :=
swap_leftInverse.surjective
theorem swap_bijective : Function.Bijective (@swap α β) :=
⟨swap_injective, swap_surjective⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.swap_map (f : α → α) (g : β → β) :
Function.Semiconj swap (map f g) (map g f) :=
Function.semiconj_iff_comp_eq.2 (map_comp_swap g f).symm
theorem eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq : ∀ {p q : α × β}, p = q ↔ p.1 = q.1 ∧ p.2 = q.2
| ⟨p₁, p₂⟩, ⟨q₁, q₂⟩ => by simp
theorem fst_eq_iff : ∀ {p : α × β} {x : α}, p.1 = x ↔ p = (x, p.2)
| ⟨a, b⟩, x => by simp
theorem snd_eq_iff : ∀ {p : α × β} {x : β}, p.2 = x ↔ p = (p.1, x)
| ⟨a, b⟩, x => by simp
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {x y : α × β}
lemma lex_iff : Prod.Lex r s x y ↔ r x.1 y.1 ∨ x.1 = y.1 ∧ s x.2 y.2 := lex_def
instance Lex.decidable [DecidableEq α]
(r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [DecidableRel r] [DecidableRel s] :
DecidableRel (Prod.Lex r s) :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_decidable_of_iff lex_def.symm
@[refl]
theorem Lex.refl_left (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsRefl α r] : ∀ x, Prod.Lex r s x x
| (_, _) => Lex.left _ _ (refl _)
instance {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsRefl α r] : IsRefl (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨Lex.refl_left _ _⟩
@[refl]
theorem Lex.refl_right (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsRefl β s] : ∀ x, Prod.Lex r s x x
| (_, _) => Lex.right _ (refl _)
instance {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsRefl β s] : IsRefl (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨Lex.refl_right _ _⟩
instance isIrrefl [IsIrrefl α r] [IsIrrefl β s] : IsIrrefl (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨by rintro ⟨i, a⟩ (⟨_, _, h⟩ | ⟨_, h⟩) <;> exact irrefl _ h⟩
@[trans]
theorem Lex.trans {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsTrans α r] [IsTrans β s] :
∀ {x y z : α × β}, Prod.Lex r s x y → Prod.Lex r s y z → Prod.Lex r s x z
| (_, _), (_, _), (_, _), left _ _ hxy₁, left _ _ hyz₁ => left _ _ (_root_.trans hxy₁ hyz₁)
| (_, _), (_, _), (_, _), left _ _ hxy₁, right _ _ => left _ _ hxy₁
| (_, _), (_, _), (_, _), right _ _, left _ _ hyz₁ => left _ _ hyz₁
| (_, _), (_, _), (_, _), right _ hxy₂, right _ hyz₂ => right _ (_root_.trans hxy₂ hyz₂)
instance {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsTrans α r] [IsTrans β s] :
IsTrans (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ Lex.trans⟩
instance {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsStrictOrder α r] [IsAntisymm β s] :
IsAntisymm (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨fun x₁ x₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ ↦
match x₁, x₂, h₁₂, h₂₁ with
| (a, _), (_, _), .left _ _ hr₁, .left _ _ hr₂ => (irrefl a (_root_.trans hr₁ hr₂)).elim
| (_, _), (_, _), .left _ _ hr₁, .right _ _ => (irrefl _ hr₁).elim
| (_, _), (_, _), .right _ _, .left _ _ hr₂ => (irrefl _ hr₂).elim
| (_, _), (_, _), .right _ hs₁, .right _ hs₂ => antisymm hs₁ hs₂ ▸ rfl⟩
instance isTotal_left {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsTotal α r] :
IsTotal (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨a₁, _⟩ ⟨a₂, _⟩ ↦ (IsTotal.total a₁ a₂).imp (Lex.left _ _) (Lex.left _ _)⟩
instance isTotal_right {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsTrichotomous α r] [IsTotal β s] :
IsTotal (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨j, b⟩ ↦ by
obtain hij | rfl | hji := trichotomous_of r i j
· exact Or.inl (.left _ _ hij)
· exact (total_of s a b).imp (.right _) (.right _)
· exact Or.inr (.left _ _ hji) ⟩
instance IsTrichotomous [IsTrichotomous α r] [IsTrichotomous β s] :
IsTrichotomous (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨j, b⟩ ↦ by
obtain hij | rfl | hji := trichotomous_of r i j
{ exact Or.inl (Lex.left _ _ hij) }
{ exact (trichotomous_of (s) a b).imp3 (Lex.right _) (congr_arg _) (Lex.right _) }
{ exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Lex.left _ _ hji) }⟩
instance [IsAsymm α r] [IsAsymm β s] :
IsAsymm (α × β) (Prod.Lex r s) where
asymm
| (_a₁, _a₂), (_b₁, _b₂), .left _ _ h₁, .left _ _ h₂ => IsAsymm.asymm _ _ h₂ h₁
| (_a₁, _a₂), (_, _b₂), .left _ _ h₁, .right _ _ => IsAsymm.asymm _ _ h₁ h₁
| (_a₁, _a₂), (_, _b₂), .right _ _, .left _ _ h₂ => IsAsymm.asymm _ _ h₂ h₂
| (_a₁, _a₂), (_, _b₂), .right _ h₁, .right _ h₂ => IsAsymm.asymm _ _ h₁ h₂
end Prod
open Prod
namespace Function
variable {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {f₁ : α → β} {g₁ : γ → δ} {f₂ : β → α} {g₂ : δ → γ}
theorem Injective.prodMap (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g) : Injective (map f g) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ Prod.ext (hf <| congr_arg Prod.fst h) (hg <| congr_arg Prod.snd h)
|
theorem Surjective.prodMap (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g) : Surjective (map f g) :=
| Mathlib/Data/Prod/Basic.lean | 220 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
| theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 261 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
/-- Addition of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q :=
(add_def _ _).symm
/-- Subtraction of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q :=
(sub_def _ _).symm
/-- Additive inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p :=
(neg_def _).symm
/-- The multiplicative unit of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
/-- Multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
/-- Division of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q :=
(div_def _ _).symm
/-- Multiplicative inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ :=
(inv_def _).symm
-- Auxiliary lemma for the `Field` instance
theorem mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {p : RatFunc K}, p ≠ 0 → p * p⁻¹ = 1
| ⟨p⟩, h => by
have : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h <| by rw [hp, ofFractionRing_zero]
simpa only [← ofFractionRing_inv, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_one,
ofFractionRing.injEq] using
mul_inv_cancel₀ this
end IsDomain
section SMul
variable {R : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : R → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| r, ⟨p⟩ => ⟨r • p⟩
instance [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : SMul R (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.smul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (c • p) = c • ofFractionRing p :=
(smul_def _ _).symm
theorem toFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : RatFunc K) :
toFractionRing (c • p) = c • toFractionRing p := by
cases p
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul]
theorem smul_eq_C_smul (x : RatFunc K) (r : K) : r • x = Polynomial.C r • x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Localization.induction_on
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul, ← ofFractionRing_smul, Localization.smul_mk,
Localization.smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul]
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]]
variable [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]]
theorem mk_smul (c : R) (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk (c • p) q = c • RatFunc.mk p q := by
letI : SMulZeroClass R (FractionRing K[X]) := inferInstance
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mk_zero, mk_zero, ← ofFractionRing_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, ← Localization.smul_mk, ←
ofFractionRing_smul]
instance : IsScalarTower R K[X] (RatFunc K) :=
⟨fun c p q => q.induction_on' fun q r _ => by rw [← mk_smul, smul_assoc, mk_smul, mk_smul]⟩
end IsDomain
end SMul
variable (K)
instance [Subsingleton K] : Subsingleton (RatFunc K) :=
toFractionRing_injective.subsingleton
instance : Inhabited (RatFunc K) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial K] : Nontrivial (RatFunc K) :=
ofFractionRing_injective.nontrivial
/-- `RatFunc K` is isomorphic to the field of fractions of `K[X]`, as rings.
This is an auxiliary definition; `simp`-normal form is `IsLocalization.algEquiv`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def toFractionRingRingEquiv : RatFunc K ≃+* FractionRing K[X] where
toFun := toFractionRing
invFun := ofFractionRing
left_inv := fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_add' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_mul]
end Field
section TacticInterlude
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by working in `FractionRing K[X]`. -/
macro "frac_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
· repeat (rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _))
try simp only [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_sub,
← ofFractionRing_neg, ← ofFractionRing_one, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_div,
← ofFractionRing_inv,
add_assoc, zero_add, add_zero, mul_assoc, mul_zero, mul_one, mul_add, inv_zero,
add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, div_eq_mul_inv,
add_mul, zero_mul, one_mul, neg_mul, mul_neg, add_neg_cancel])
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by applying `RatFunc.induction_on`. -/
macro "smul_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
repeat
(first
| rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)
| intro) <;>
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_smul] <;>
simp only [add_comm, mul_comm, zero_smul, succ_nsmul, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_add, mul_one, mul_zero,
neg_add, mul_neg,
Int.cast_zero, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
Int.cast_negSucc, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_succ,
Localization.mk_zero, Localization.add_mk_self, Localization.neg_mk,
ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_neg])
end TacticInterlude
section CommRing
variable (K) [CommRing K]
/-- `RatFunc K` is a commutative monoid.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (RatFunc K) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by frac_tac
mul_comm := by frac_tac
one := 1
one_mul := by frac_tac
mul_one := by frac_tac
npow := npowRec
/-- `RatFunc K` is an additive commutative group.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (RatFunc K) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by frac_tac
add_comm := by frac_tac
zero := 0
zero_add := by frac_tac
add_zero := by frac_tac
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by frac_tac
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by frac_tac
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by smul_tac
nsmul_succ _ := by smul_tac
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by smul_tac
zsmul_succ' _ := by smul_tac
zsmul_neg' _ := by smul_tac
instance instCommRing : CommRing (RatFunc K) :=
{ instCommMonoid K, instAddCommGroup K with
zero := 0
sub := Sub.sub
zero_mul := by frac_tac
mul_zero := by frac_tac
left_distrib := by frac_tac
right_distrib := by frac_tac
one := 1
nsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul := (· • ·)
npow := npowRec }
variable {K}
section LiftHom
open RatFunc
variable {G₀ L R S F : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero G₀] [Field L] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R[X] S[X]]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def map [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →* RatFunc S where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f
(fun n d => if h : φ d ∈ S[X]⁰ then ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, h⟩) else 0)
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
simp only [Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq), Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq'),
dif_pos, ofFractionRing.injEq, Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff]
refine Localization.r_of_eq ?_
simpa only [map_mul] using congr_arg φ h
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, OneMemClass.one_mem, dite_true, ofFractionRing.injEq,
Localization.mk_one, Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x; obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
have hq : φ q ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q.prop
have hq' : φ q' ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q'.prop
have hqq' : φ ↑(q * q') ∈ S[X]⁰ := by simpa using Submonoid.mul_mem _ hq hq'
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos hq,
dif_pos hq', dif_pos hqq', ← ofFractionRing_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul,
Localization.mk_mul, Submonoid.mk_mul_mk]
theorem map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
map φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) =
ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, hφ d.prop⟩) := by
simp only [map, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ d.2), ↓reduceDIte]
theorem map_injective [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ)
(hf : Function.Injective φ) : Function.Injective (map φ hφ) := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
simpa only [map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, ofFractionRing_injective.eq_iff,
Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff, Localization.r_iff_exists, mul_cancel_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors,
exists_const, ← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] using h
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →+* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapRingHom [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S :=
{ map φ hφ with
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, ← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰),
← Localization.mk_zero (1 : S[X]⁰), map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, map_zero,
Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
· simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk, map_add, map_mul,
MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul,
-- We have to specify `S[X]⁰` to `mk_mul_mk`, otherwise it will try to rewrite
-- the wrong occurrence.
Submonoid.mk_mul_mk S[X]⁰] }
theorem coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapRingHom φ hφ : RatFunc R → RatFunc S) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
-- TODO: Generalize to `FunLike` classes,
/-- Lift a monoid with zero homomorphism `R[X] →*₀ G₀` to a `RatFunc R →*₀ G₀`
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftMonoidWithZeroHom (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →*₀ G₀ where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f (fun p q => φ p / φ q) fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim p q, Subsingleton.elim p' q, Subsingleton.elim q' q]
rw [div_eq_div_iff, ← map_mul, mul_comm p, h, map_mul, mul_comm] <;>
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ ‹_›)
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, div_one]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with p q
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p' q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul]
simp only [liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, div_mul_div_comm, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰), liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
map_zero, zero_div]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ)
(n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ') := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with a
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with a'
simp_rw [liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
intro h
congr 1
refine Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr (Localization.r_of_eq (M := R[X]) ?_)
have := mul_eq_mul_of_div_eq_div _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, hφ.eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_comm a'.fst] at this
all_goals exact map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)
/-- Lift an injective ring homomorphism `R[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc R →+* L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftRingHom (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →+* L :=
{ liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ.toMonoidWithZeroHom hφ with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidWithZeroHom.toZeroHom_coe]
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (x + y) y, Subsingleton.elim x 0, map_zero, zero_add]
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk]
simp only [RingHom.toMonoidWithZeroHom_eq_coe,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
rw [div_add_div, div_eq_div_iff]
· rw [mul_comm _ p, mul_comm _ p', mul_comm _ (φ p'), add_comm]
simp only [map_add, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
all_goals
try simp only [← map_mul, ← Submonoid.coe_mul]
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)) }
theorem liftRingHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X])
(d : R[X]⁰) : liftRingHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _
theorem liftRingHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftRingHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
end LiftHom
variable (K)
@[stacks 09FK]
instance instField [IsDomain K] : Field (RatFunc K) where
inv_zero := by frac_tac
div := (· / ·)
div_eq_mul_inv := by frac_tac
mul_inv_cancel _ := mul_inv_cancel
zpow := zpowRec
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
section IsFractionRing
/-! ### `RatFunc` as field of fractions of `Polynomial` -/
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
instance (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] : Algebra R (RatFunc K) where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun x := RatFunc.mk (algebraMap _ _ x) 1
map_add' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_add, ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_mul, ofFractionRing_mul]
map_one' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_one, ofFractionRing_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_zero, ofFractionRing_zero] }
smul := (· • ·)
smul_def' c x := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on' with p q hq
rw [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, mk_one', ← mk_smul,
mk_def_of_ne (c • p) hq, mk_def_of_ne p hq, ← ofFractionRing_mul,
IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' _ _ := mul_comm _ _
variable {K}
/-- The coercion from polynomials to rational functions, implemented as the algebra map from a
domain to its field of fractions -/
@[coe]
def coePolynomial (P : Polynomial K) : RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _ P
instance : Coe (Polynomial K) (RatFunc K) := ⟨coePolynomial⟩
theorem mk_one (x : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk x 1 = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
theorem ofFractionRing_algebraMap (x : K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (algebraMap _ (FractionRing K[X]) x) = algebraMap _ _ x := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_one']
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_div (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk p q = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
simp only [mk_eq_div', ofFractionRing_div, ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
@[simp]
theorem div_smul {R} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]] [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]] (c : R)
(p q : K[X]) :
algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) (c • p) / algebraMap _ _ q =
c • (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, mk_smul, mk_eq_div]
theorem algebraMap_apply {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] (x : R) :
algebraMap R (RatFunc K) x = algebraMap _ _ (algebraMap R K[X] x) / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by
rw [← mk_eq_div]
rfl
theorem map_apply_div_ne_zero {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
have hq' : φ q ≠ 0 := nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hq))
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk,
mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq']
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_div {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· have : (0 : RatFunc K) = algebraMap K[X] _ 0 / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by simp
rw [map_zero, map_zero, map_zero, div_zero, div_zero, this, map_apply_div_ne_zero, map_one,
map_one, div_one, map_zero, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero
exact map_apply_div_ne_zero _ _ _ _ hq
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· simp only [div_zero, map_zero]
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
@[simp]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q := by
rw [← map_div₀, liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _
@[simp]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _
variable (K)
theorem ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap :
ofFractionRing ∘ algebraMap K[X] (FractionRing K[X]) = algebraMap _ _ :=
funext ofFractionRing_algebraMap
theorem algebraMap_injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)) := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap]
exact ofFractionRing_injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
variable {K}
section LiftAlgHom
variable {L R S : Type*} [Field L] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]]
[Algebra S L] [Algebra S R[X]] (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
/-- Lift an algebra homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]`
to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapAlgHom (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc K →ₐ[S] RatFunc R :=
{ mapRingHom φ hφ with
commutes' := fun r => by
simp_rw [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map, algebraMap_apply r, map_apply_div,
map_one, AlgHom.commutes] }
theorem coe_mapAlgHom_eq_coe_map (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapAlgHom φ hφ : RatFunc K → RatFunc R) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
/-- Lift an injective algebra homomorphism `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftAlgHom : RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L :=
{ liftRingHom φ.toRingHom hφ with
commutes' := fun r => by
simp_rw [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, algebraMap_apply r,
liftRingHom_apply_div, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, map_one, div_one, AlgHom.commutes] }
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (n : K[X]) (d : K[X]⁰) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _
theorem liftAlgHom_injective (φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftAlgHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
@[simp]
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_div' (p q : K[X]) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _
theorem liftAlgHom_apply_div (p q : K[X]) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _
end LiftAlgHom
variable (K)
/-- `RatFunc K` is the field of fractions of the polynomials over `K`. -/
instance : IsFractionRing K[X] (RatFunc K) where
map_units' y := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
exact (toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm.toRingHom.isUnit_map (IsLocalization.map_units _ y)
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap, ← ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
exact fun h ↦ IsLocalization.exists_of_eq ((toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm.injective h)
surj' := by
rintro ⟨z⟩
convert IsLocalization.surj K[X]⁰ z
simp only [← ofFractionRing_algebraMap, Function.comp_apply, ← ofFractionRing_mul,
ofFractionRing.injEq]
variable {K}
theorem algebraMap_ne_zero {x : K[X]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) x ≠ 0 := by
simpa
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_div {P : Sort v} (p q : K[X]) (f : K[X] → K[X] → P) (f0 : ∀ p, f p 0 = f 0 1)
(H' : ∀ {p q p' q'} (_hq : q ≠ 0) (_hq' : q' ≠ 0), q' * p = q * p' → f p q = f p' q')
(H : ∀ {p q p' q'} (_hq : q ∈ K[X]⁰) (_hq' : q' ∈ K[X]⁰), q' * p = q * p' → f p q = f p' q' :=
fun {_ _ _ _} hq hq' h => H' (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hq) (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hq') h) :
(RatFunc.liftOn (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) f @H = f p q := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, liftOn_mk _ _ f f0 @H']
@[simp]
theorem liftOn'_div {P : Sort v} (p q : K[X]) (f : K[X] → K[X] → P) (f0 : ∀ p, f p 0 = f 0 1)
(H) :
(RatFunc.liftOn' (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) f @H = f p q := by
rw [RatFunc.liftOn', liftOn_div _ _ _ f0]
apply liftOn_condition_of_liftOn'_condition H
/-- Induction principle for `RatFunc K`: if `f p q : P (p / q)` for all `p q : K[X]`,
then `P` holds on all elements of `RatFunc K`.
See also `induction_on'`, which is a recursion principle defined in terms of `RatFunc.mk`.
-/
protected theorem induction_on {P : RatFunc K → Prop} (x : RatFunc K)
(f : ∀ (p q : K[X]) (_ : q ≠ 0), P (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p / algebraMap _ _ q)) : P x :=
x.induction_on' fun p q hq => by simpa using f p q hq
theorem ofFractionRing_mk' (x : K[X]) (y : K[X]⁰) :
ofFractionRing (IsLocalization.mk' _ x y) =
IsLocalization.mk' (RatFunc K) x y := by
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ← mk_eq_div', ← mk_eq_div]
theorem mk_eq_mk' (f : Polynomial K) {g : Polynomial K} (hg : g ≠ 0) :
RatFunc.mk f g = IsLocalization.mk' (RatFunc K) f ⟨g, mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 hg⟩ :=
by simp only [mk_eq_div, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
@[simp]
theorem ofFractionRing_eq :
(ofFractionRing : FractionRing K[X] → RatFunc K) = IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _ :=
funext fun x =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by
simp only [Localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply, ofFractionRing_mk', IsLocalization.algEquiv_apply,
IsLocalization.map_mk', RingHom.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem toFractionRing_eq :
(toFractionRing : RatFunc K → FractionRing K[X]) = IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _ :=
funext fun ⟨x⟩ =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by
simp only [Localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply, ofFractionRing_mk', IsLocalization.algEquiv_apply,
IsLocalization.map_mk', RingHom.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem toFractionRingRingEquiv_symm_eq :
(toFractionRingRingEquiv K).symm = (IsLocalization.algEquiv K[X]⁰ _ _).toRingEquiv := by
ext x
simp [toFractionRingRingEquiv, ofFractionRing_eq, AlgEquiv.coe_ringEquiv']
end IsDomain
end IsFractionRing
end CommRing
section NumDenom
/-! ### Numerator and denominator -/
open GCDMonoid Polynomial
variable [Field K]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `RatFunc.numDenom` are numerator and denominator of a rational function over a field,
normalized such that the denominator is monic. -/
def numDenom (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] × K[X] :=
x.liftOn'
(fun p q =>
if q = 0 then ⟨0, 1⟩
else
let r := gcd p q
⟨Polynomial.C (q / r).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / r),
Polynomial.C (q / r).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / r)⟩)
(by
intros p q a hq ha
dsimp
rw [if_neg hq, if_neg (mul_ne_zero ha hq)]
have ha' : a.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr ha
have hainv : a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ ≠ 0 := inv_ne_zero ha'
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, gcd_mul_left, normalize_apply a, Polynomial.coe_normUnit, mul_assoc,
CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ ha']
have hdeg : (gcd p q).degree ≤ q.degree := degree_gcd_le_right _ hq
have hdeg' : (Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q).degree ≤ q.degree := by
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul, Polynomial.degree_C hainv, zero_add]
exact hdeg
have hdivp : Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q ∣ p :=
(C_mul_dvd hainv).mpr (gcd_dvd_left p q)
have hdivq : Polynomial.C a.leadingCoeff⁻¹ * gcd p q ∣ q :=
(C_mul_dvd hainv).mpr (gcd_dvd_right p q)
rw [EuclideanDomain.mul_div_mul_cancel ha hdivp, EuclideanDomain.mul_div_mul_cancel ha hdivq,
leadingCoeff_div hdeg, leadingCoeff_div hdeg', Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul,
Polynomial.leadingCoeff_C, div_C_mul, div_C_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.C_mul, ←
mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.C_mul]
constructor <;> congr <;>
rw [inv_div, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, ← mul_assoc, inv_inv, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha',
one_mul, inv_div])
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem numDenom_div (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
numDenom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
(Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q),
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / gcd p q)) := by
rw [numDenom, liftOn'_div, if_neg hq]
intro p
rw [if_pos rfl, if_neg (one_ne_zero' K[X])]
simp
/-- `RatFunc.num` is the numerator of a rational function,
normalized such that the denominator is monic. -/
def num (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] :=
x.numDenom.1
open scoped Classical in
private theorem num_div' (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) := by
rw [num, numDenom_div _ hq]
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : num (0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by convert num_div' (0 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem num_div (p q : K[X]) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· exact num_div' p hq
@[simp]
theorem num_one : num (1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by convert num_div (1 : K[X]) 1 <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem num_algebraMap (p : K[X]) : num (algebraMap _ _ p) = p := by convert num_div p 1 <;> simp
theorem num_div_dvd (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
num (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) ∣ p := by
classical
rw [num_div _ q, C_mul_dvd]
· exact EuclideanDomain.div_dvd_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left p q)
· simpa only [Ne, inv_eq_zero, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] using right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
open scoped Classical in
/-- A version of `num_div_dvd` with the LHS in simp normal form -/
@[simp]
theorem num_div_dvd' (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (p / gcd p q) ∣ p := by simpa using num_div_dvd p hq
/-- `RatFunc.denom` is the denominator of a rational function,
normalized such that it is monic. -/
def denom (x : RatFunc K) : K[X] :=
x.numDenom.2
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem denom_div (p : K[X]) {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
denom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
Polynomial.C (q / gcd p q).leadingCoeff⁻¹ * (q / gcd p q) := by
rw [denom, numDenom_div _ hq]
theorem monic_denom (x : RatFunc K) : (denom x).Monic := by
classical
induction x using RatFunc.induction_on with
| f p q hq =>
rw [denom_div p hq, mul_comm]
exact Polynomial.monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv (right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq)
theorem denom_ne_zero (x : RatFunc K) : denom x ≠ 0 :=
(monic_denom x).ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem denom_zero : denom (0 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
convert denom_div (0 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem denom_one : denom (1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
convert denom_div (1 : K[X]) one_ne_zero <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem denom_algebraMap (p : K[X]) : denom (algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) p) = 1 := by
convert denom_div p one_ne_zero <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem denom_div_dvd (p q : K[X]) : denom (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) ∣ q := by
classical
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [denom_div _ hq, C_mul_dvd]
· exact EuclideanDomain.div_dvd_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_right p q)
· simpa only [Ne, inv_eq_zero, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] using right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
@[simp]
theorem num_div_denom (x : RatFunc K) : algebraMap _ _ (num x) / algebraMap _ _ (denom x) = x := by
classical
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on with p q hq
have q_div_ne_zero : q / gcd p q ≠ 0 := right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq
rw [num_div p q, denom_div p hq, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_div_mul_left,
div_eq_div_iff, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_mul, mul_comm _ q, ←
EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc, ← EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc, mul_comm]
· apply gcd_dvd_right
· apply gcd_dvd_left
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero q_div_ne_zero
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero hq
· refine algebraMap_ne_zero (mt Polynomial.C_eq_zero.mp ?_)
exact inv_ne_zero (Polynomial.leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr q_div_ne_zero)
theorem isCoprime_num_denom (x : RatFunc K) : IsCoprime x.num x.denom := by
classical
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on with p q hq
rw [num_div, denom_div _ hq]
exact (isCoprime_mul_unit_left
((leadingCoeff_ne_zero.2 <| right_div_gcd_ne_zero hq).isUnit.inv.map C) _ _).2
(isCoprime_div_gcd_div_gcd hq)
@[simp]
theorem num_eq_zero_iff {x : RatFunc K} : num x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← num_div_denom x, h, RingHom.map_zero, zero_div], fun h => h.symm ▸ num_zero⟩
theorem num_ne_zero {x : RatFunc K} (hx : x ≠ 0) : num x ≠ 0 :=
mt num_eq_zero_iff.mp hx
theorem num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff {x : RatFunc K} {p q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
x.num * q = p * x.denom ↔ x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
rw [← (algebraMap_injective K).eq_iff, eq_div_iff (algebraMap_ne_zero hq)]
conv_rhs => rw [← num_div_denom x]
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, mul_comm (Inv.inv _), ←
mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_iff]
exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
theorem num_denom_add (x y : RatFunc K) :
(x + y).num * (x.denom * y.denom) = (x.num * y.denom + x.denom * y.num) * (x + y).denom :=
(num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))).mpr <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← num_div_denom x, ← num_div_denom y]
rw [div_add_div, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul]
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero y)
theorem num_denom_neg (x : RatFunc K) : (-x).num * x.denom = -x.num * (-x).denom := by
rw [num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (denom_ne_zero x), map_neg, neg_div, num_div_denom]
theorem num_denom_mul (x y : RatFunc K) :
(x * y).num * (x.denom * y.denom) = x.num * y.num * (x * y).denom :=
(num_mul_eq_mul_denom_iff (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))).mpr <| by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← num_div_denom x, ← num_div_denom y, div_mul_div_comm, ← RingHom.map_mul, ←
RingHom.map_mul]
theorem num_dvd {x : RatFunc K} {p : K[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
num x ∣ p ↔ ∃ q : K[X], q ≠ 0 ∧ x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨q, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨_hx, hq⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hp
use denom x * q
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, div_self, mul_one, num_div_denom]
· exact ⟨mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) hq, rfl⟩
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero hq
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
exact num_div_dvd p hq
theorem denom_dvd {x : RatFunc K} {q : K[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
denom x ∣ q ↔ ∃ p : K[X], x = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨_hx, hp⟩ := mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hq
use num x * p
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, div_self, mul_one, num_div_denom]
exact algebraMap_ne_zero hp
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩
exact denom_div_dvd p q
theorem num_mul_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : num (x * y) ∣ num x * num y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
rw [num_dvd (mul_ne_zero (num_ne_zero hx) (num_ne_zero hy))]
refine ⟨x.denom * y.denom, mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y), ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
theorem denom_mul_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : denom (x * y) ∣ denom x * denom y := by
rw [denom_dvd (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))]
refine ⟨x.num * y.num, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_mul_div_comm, num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
theorem denom_add_dvd (x y : RatFunc K) : denom (x + y) ∣ denom x * denom y := by
rw [denom_dvd (mul_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x) (denom_ne_zero y))]
refine ⟨x.num * y.denom + x.denom * y.num, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, ← div_add_div,
num_div_denom, num_div_denom]
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero x)
· exact algebraMap_ne_zero (denom_ne_zero y)
theorem map_denom_ne_zero {L F : Type*} [Zero L] [FunLike F K[X] L] [ZeroHomClass F K[X] L]
(φ : F) (hφ : Function.Injective φ) (f : RatFunc K) : φ f.denom ≠ 0 := fun H =>
(denom_ne_zero f) ((map_eq_zero_iff φ hφ).mp H)
theorem map_apply {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (f : RatFunc K) :
map φ hφ f = algebraMap _ _ (φ f.num) / algebraMap _ _ (φ f.denom) := by
rw [← num_div_denom f, map_apply_div_ne_zero, num_div_denom f]
exact denom_ne_zero _
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L] (φ : K[X] →*₀ L)
(hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (f : RatFunc K) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ f = φ f.num / φ f.denom := by
rw [← num_div_denom f, liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div, num_div_denom]
theorem liftRingHom_apply {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(f : RatFunc K) : liftRingHom φ hφ f = φ f.num / φ f.denom :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply _ hφ _
theorem liftAlgHom_apply {L S : Type*} [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]
(φ : K[X] →ₐ[S] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (f : RatFunc K) :
liftAlgHom φ hφ f = φ f.num / φ f.denom :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply _ hφ _
theorem num_mul_denom_add_denom_mul_num_ne_zero {x y : RatFunc K} (hxy : x + y ≠ 0) :
x.num * y.denom + x.denom * y.num ≠ 0 := by
intro h_zero
have h := num_denom_add x y
rw [h_zero, zero_mul] at h
exact (mul_ne_zero (num_ne_zero hxy) (mul_ne_zero x.denom_ne_zero y.denom_ne_zero)) h
end NumDenom
end RatFunc
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 1,085 | 1,092 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Yaël Dillies, Jineon Baek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem
This file states Fermat's Last Theorem. We provide a statement over a general semiring with
specific exponent, along with the usual statement over the naturals.
## Main definitions
* `FermatLastTheoremWith R n`: The statement that only solutions to the Fermat
equation `a^n + b^n = c^n` in the semiring `R` have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`.
Note that this statement can certainly be false for certain values of `R` and `n`.
For example `FermatLastTheoremWith ℝ 3` is false as `1^3 + 1^3 = (2^{1/3})^3`, and
`FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ 2` is false, as 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2.
* `FermatLastTheoremFor n` : The statement that the only solutions to `a^n + b^n = c^n` in `ℕ`
have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`. Again, this statement is not always true, for
example `FermatLastTheoremFor 1` is false because `2^1 + 2^1 = 4^1`.
* `FermatLastTheorem` : The statement of Fermat's Last Theorem, namely that the only solutions to
`a^n + b^n = c^n` in `ℕ` when `n ≥ 3` have `a = 0`, `b = 0` or `c = 0`.
## History
Fermat's Last Theorem was an open problem in number theory for hundreds of years, until it was
finally solved by Andrew Wiles, assisted by Richard Taylor, in 1994 (see
[A. Wiles, *Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem*][Wiles-FLT] and
[R. Taylor and A. Wiles, *Ring-theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras*][Taylor-Wiles-FLT]).
An ongoing Lean formalisation of the proof, using mathlib as a dependency, is taking place at
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/FLT .
-/
open List
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem over a given semiring with a specific exponent. -/
def FermatLastTheoremWith (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ a b c : R, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → a ^ n + b ^ n ≠ c ^ n
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem over the naturals for a given exponent. -/
def FermatLastTheoremFor (n : ℕ) : Prop := FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n
/-- Statement of Fermat's Last Theorem: `a ^ n + b ^ n = c ^ n` has no nontrivial natural solution
when `n ≥ 3`.
This is now a theorem of Wiles and Taylor--Wiles; see
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/FLT for an ongoing Lean formalisation of
a proof. -/
def FermatLastTheorem : Prop := ∀ n ≥ 3, FermatLastTheoremFor n
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_zero : FermatLastTheoremFor 0 :=
fun _ _ _ _ _ _ ↦ by norm_num
lemma not_fermatLastTheoremFor_one : ¬ FermatLastTheoremFor 1 :=
fun h ↦ h 1 1 2 (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
lemma not_fermatLastTheoremFor_two : ¬ FermatLastTheoremFor 2 :=
fun h ↦ h 3 4 5 (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {m n : ℕ}
lemma FermatLastTheoremWith.mono (hmn : m ∣ n) (hm : FermatLastTheoremWith R m) :
FermatLastTheoremWith R n := by
rintro a b c ha hb hc
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hmn
simp_rw [pow_mul']
refine hm _ _ _ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> exact pow_ne_zero _ ‹_›
lemma FermatLastTheoremFor.mono (hmn : m ∣ n) (hm : FermatLastTheoremFor m) :
FermatLastTheoremFor n := by
exact FermatLastTheoremWith.mono hmn hm
lemma fermatLastTheoremWith_nat_int_rat_tfae (n : ℕ) :
TFAE [FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n, FermatLastTheoremWith ℤ n, FermatLastTheoremWith ℚ n] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2
| h, a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, habc => by
obtain hn | hn := n.even_or_odd
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [hn.pow_abs, habc]
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hb.lt_or_lt <;>
obtain hc | hc := hc.lt_or_lt
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_neg, neg_pow a, neg_pow b, neg_pow c, ← mul_add, habc, *]
· exact (by positivity : 0 < c ^ n).not_lt <| habc.symm.trans_lt <| add_neg (hn.pow_neg ha) <|
hn.pow_neg hb
· refine h b.natAbs c.natAbs a.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h a.natAbs c.natAbs b.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h c.natAbs a.natAbs b.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq, *]
· refine h c.natAbs b.natAbs a.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg, hn.neg_pow, habc, add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq, *]
· exact (by positivity : 0 < a ^ n + b ^ n).not_lt <| habc.trans_lt <| hn.pow_neg hc
· refine h a.natAbs b.natAbs c.natAbs (by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity)
(Int.natCast_inj.1 ?_)
push_cast
simp only [abs_of_pos, habc, *]
| tfae_have 2 → 3
| h, a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, habc => by
rw [← Rat.num_ne_zero] at ha hb hc
refine h (a.num * b.den * c.den) (a.den * b.num * c.den) (a.den * b.den * c.num)
(by positivity) (by positivity) (by positivity) ?_
have : (a.den * b.den * c.den : ℚ) ^ n ≠ 0 := by positivity
refine Int.cast_injective <| (div_left_inj' this).1 ?_
push_cast
simp only [add_div, ← div_pow, mul_div_mul_comm, div_self (by positivity : (a.den : ℚ) ≠ 0),
div_self (by positivity : (b.den : ℚ) ≠ 0), div_self (by positivity : (c.den : ℚ) ≠ 0),
one_mul, mul_one, Rat.num_div_den, habc]
tfae_have 3 → 1
| h, a, b, c => mod_cast h a b c
tfae_finish
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_nat {n : ℕ} : FermatLastTheoremFor n ↔ FermatLastTheoremWith ℕ n :=
Iff.rfl
lemma fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_int {n : ℕ} : FermatLastTheoremFor n ↔ FermatLastTheoremWith ℤ n :=
(fermatLastTheoremWith_nat_int_rat_tfae n).out 0 1
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Basic.lean | 126 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
/-!
# Integral and algebraic elements of a fraction field
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S]
open Polynomial
namespace IsLocalization
section IntegerNormalization
open Polynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `coeffIntegerNormalization p` gives the coefficients of the polynomial
`integerNormalization p` -/
noncomputable def coeffIntegerNormalization (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) : R :=
if hi : i ∈ p.support then
Classical.choose
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
else 0
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) (h : coeff p i = 0) :
coeffIntegerNormalization M p i = 0 := by
simp only [coeffIntegerNormalization, h, mem_support_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
dif_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ)
(h : coeffIntegerNormalization M p i ≠ 0) : i ∈ p.support := by
contrapose h
rw [Ne, Classical.not_not, coeffIntegerNormalization, dif_neg h]
/-- `integerNormalization g` normalizes `g` to have integer coefficients
by clearing the denominators -/
noncomputable def integerNormalization (p : S[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (coeffIntegerNormalization M p i)
@[simp]
theorem integerNormalization_coeff (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) :
(integerNormalization M p).coeff i = coeffIntegerNormalization M p i := by
simp +contextual [integerNormalization, coeff_monomial,
coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support]
theorem integerNormalization_spec (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, ∀ i, algebraMap R S ((integerNormalization M p).coeff i) = (b : R) • p.coeff i := by
classical
use Classical.choose (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
intro i
rw [integerNormalization_coeff, coeffIntegerNormalization]
split_ifs with hi
· exact
Classical.choose_spec
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· rw [RingHom.map_zero, not_mem_support_iff.mp hi, smul_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert (smul_zero _).symm, ...`
theorem integerNormalization_map_to_map (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, (integerNormalization M p).map (algebraMap R S) = (b : R) • p :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_spec M p
⟨b,
Polynomial.ext fun i => by
rw [coeff_map, coeff_smul]
exact hb i⟩
variable {R' : Type*} [CommRing R']
theorem integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero (g : S →+* R') (p : S[X]) {x : R'}
(hx : eval₂ g x p = 0) : eval₂ (g.comp (algebraMap R S)) x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_map_to_map M p
_root_.trans (eval₂_map (algebraMap R S) g x).symm
(by rw [hb, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S (b : R) p, eval₂_smul, hx, mul_zero])
theorem integerNormalization_aeval_eq_zero [Algebra R R'] [Algebra S R'] [IsScalarTower R S R']
(p : S[X]) {x : R'} (hx : aeval x p = 0) : aeval x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R S R',
integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero _ (algebraMap _ _) _ hx]
end IntegerNormalization
end IsLocalization
namespace IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
variable {A K C : Type*} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [Field K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable [CommRing C]
theorem integerNormalization_eq_zero_iff {p : K[X]} :
integerNormalization (nonZeroDivisors A) p = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
refine Polynomial.ext_iff.trans (Polynomial.ext_iff.trans ?_).symm
obtain ⟨⟨b, nonzero⟩, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) p
constructor <;> intro h i
· -- Porting note: avoided some defeq abuse
rw [coeff_zero, ← to_map_eq_zero_iff (K := K), hb i, h i, coeff_zero, smul_zero]
· have hi := h i
rw [Polynomial.coeff_zero, ← @to_map_eq_zero_iff A _ K, hb i, Algebra.smul_def] at hi
apply Or.resolve_left (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hi)
intro h
apply mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp nonzero
exact to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp h
variable (A K C)
/-- An element of a ring is algebraic over the ring `A` iff it is algebraic
over the field of fractions of `A`.
-/
theorem isAlgebraic_iff [Algebra A C] [Algebra K C] [IsScalarTower A K C] {x : C} :
IsAlgebraic A x ↔ IsAlgebraic K x := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨p, hp, px⟩
· refine ⟨p.map (algebraMap A K), fun h => hp (Polynomial.ext fun i => ?_), ?_⟩
· have : algebraMap A K (p.coeff i) = 0 :=
_root_.trans (Polynomial.coeff_map _ _).symm (by simp [h])
exact to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp this
· exact (Polynomial.aeval_map_algebraMap K _ _).trans px
· exact
⟨integerNormalization _ p, mt integerNormalization_eq_zero_iff.mp hp,
integerNormalization_aeval_eq_zero _ p px⟩
variable {A K C}
/-- A ring is algebraic over the ring `A` iff it is algebraic over the field of fractions of `A`.
-/
theorem comap_isAlgebraic_iff [Algebra A C] [Algebra K C] [IsScalarTower A K C] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic A C ↔ Algebra.IsAlgebraic K C :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun x => (isAlgebraic_iff A K C).mp (h.isAlgebraic x)⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x => (isAlgebraic_iff A K C).mpr (h.isAlgebraic x)⟩⟩
end IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
section IsIntegral
variable {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ]
variable [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ]
variable [Algebra S Sₘ] [IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
variable {M}
open Polynomial
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_localization_at_leadingCoeff {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
[CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (p : R[X]) (hf : p.eval₂ f x = 0) (M : Submonoid R)
(hM : p.leadingCoeff ∈ M) {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ] [Algebra R Rₘ]
[IsLocalization M Rₘ] [Algebra S Sₘ] [IsLocalization (M.map f : Submonoid S) Sₘ] :
(map Sₘ f M.le_comap_map : Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegralElem (algebraMap S Sₘ x) := by
by_cases triv : (1 : Rₘ) = 0
· exact ⟨0, ⟨_root_.trans leadingCoeff_zero triv.symm, eval₂_zero _ _⟩⟩
haveI : Nontrivial Rₘ := nontrivial_of_ne 1 0 triv
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv.mp (map_units Rₘ ⟨p.leadingCoeff, hM⟩)
refine ⟨p.map (algebraMap R Rₘ) * C b, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rwa [leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (algebraMap R Rₘ)]
refine fun hfp => zero_ne_one
(_root_.trans (zero_mul b).symm (hfp ▸ hb) : (0 : Rₘ) = 1)
· refine eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left _ _ _ ?_
rw [eval₂_map, IsLocalization.map_comp, ← hom_eval₂ _ f (algebraMap S Sₘ) x]
exact _root_.trans (congr_arg (algebraMap S Sₘ) hf) (RingHom.map_zero _)
/-- Given a particular witness to an element being algebraic over an algebra `R → S`,
We can localize to a submonoid containing the leading coefficient to make it integral.
Explicitly, the map between the localizations will be an integral ring morphism -/
theorem is_integral_localization_at_leadingCoeff {x : S} (p : R[X]) (hp : aeval x p = 0)
(hM : p.leadingCoeff ∈ M) :
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegralElem
(algebraMap S Sₘ x) :=
-- Porting note: added `haveI`
haveI : IsLocalization (Submonoid.map (algebraMap R S) M) Sₘ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ)
(algebraMap R S).isIntegralElem_localization_at_leadingCoeff x p hp M hM
/-- If `R → S` is an integral extension, `M` is a submonoid of `R`,
`Rₘ` is the localization of `R` at `M`,
and `Sₘ` is the localization of `S` at the image of `M` under the extension map,
then the induced map `Rₘ → Sₘ` is also an integral extension -/
theorem isIntegral_localization [Algebra.IsIntegral R S] :
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegral := by
intro x
obtain ⟨⟨s, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩, hx⟩ := surj (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) x
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hu
obtain ⟨v', hv'⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 (map_units Rₘ ⟨v, hv.1⟩)
refine @IsIntegral.of_mul_unit Rₘ _ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S) x (algebraMap S Sₘ u) v' ?_ ?_
· replace hv' := congr_arg (@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S)) hv'
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_one, localizationAlgebraMap_def, IsLocalization.map_eq]
at hv'
exact hv.2 ▸ hv'
· obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := R) s
exact hx.symm ▸ is_integral_localization_at_leadingCoeff p hp.2 (hp.1.symm ▸ M.one_mem)
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- It claims the `have : IsLocalization` line is unnecessary,
-- but remove it and the proof won't work.
theorem isIntegral_localization' {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}
(hf : f.IsIntegral) (M : Submonoid R) :
(map (Localization (M.map (f : R →* S))) f
(M.le_comap_map : _ ≤ Submonoid.comap (f : R →* S) _) :
Localization M →+* _).IsIntegral :=
-- Porting note: added
let _ := f.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsIntegral R S := ⟨hf⟩
have : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M)
(Localization (Submonoid.map (f : R →* S) M)) := Localization.isLocalization
isIntegral_localization
variable (M)
theorem IsLocalization.scaleRoots_commonDenom_mem_lifts (p : Rₘ[X])
(hp : p.leadingCoeff ∈ (algebraMap R Rₘ).range) :
p.scaleRoots (algebraMap R Rₘ <| IsLocalization.commonDenom M p.support p.coeff) ∈
Polynomial.lifts (algebraMap R Rₘ) := by
rw [Polynomial.lifts_iff_coeff_lifts]
intro n
rw [Polynomial.coeff_scaleRoots]
by_cases h₁ : n ∈ p.support
on_goal 1 => by_cases h₂ : n = p.natDegree
· rwa [h₂, Polynomial.coeff_natDegree, tsub_self, pow_zero, _root_.mul_one]
· have : n + 1 ≤ p.natDegree := lt_of_le_of_ne (Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ h₁) h₂
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_tsub_of_add_le_left this), pow_add, pow_one, mul_comm,
_root_.mul_assoc, ← map_pow]
change _ ∈ (algebraMap R Rₘ).range
apply mul_mem
· exact RingHom.mem_range_self _ _
· rw [← Algebra.smul_def]
exact ⟨_, IsLocalization.map_integerMultiple M p.support p.coeff ⟨n, h₁⟩⟩
· rw [Polynomial.not_mem_support_iff] at h₁
rw [h₁, zero_mul]
exact zero_mem (algebraMap R Rₘ).range
theorem IsIntegral.exists_multiple_integral_of_isLocalization [Algebra Rₘ S] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ S]
(x : S) (hx : IsIntegral Rₘ x) : ∃ m : M, IsIntegral R (m • x) := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial Rₘ with _ | nontriv
· haveI := (_root_.algebraMap Rₘ S).codomain_trivial
exact ⟨1, Polynomial.X, Polynomial.monic_X, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := hx
-- Porting note: obtain doesn't support side goals
have :=
lifts_and_natDegree_eq_and_monic (IsLocalization.scaleRoots_commonDenom_mem_lifts M p ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨p', hp'₁, -, hp'₂⟩ := this
refine ⟨IsLocalization.commonDenom M p.support p.coeff, p', hp'₂, ?_⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R Rₘ S, ← Polynomial.eval₂_map, hp'₁, Submonoid.smul_def,
Algebra.smul_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ S]
exact Polynomial.scaleRoots_eval₂_eq_zero _ hp₂
· rw [hp₁.leadingCoeff]
exact one_mem _
· rwa [Polynomial.monic_scaleRoots_iff]
end IsIntegral
variable {A K : Type*} [CommRing A]
namespace IsIntegralClosure
variable (A)
variable {L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra A K] [Algebra A L] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable (C : Type*) [CommRing C] [IsDomain C] [Algebra C L] [IsIntegralClosure C A L]
variable [Algebra A C] [IsScalarTower A C L]
open Algebra
/-- If the field `L` is an algebraic extension of the integral domain `A`,
the integral closure `C` of `A` in `L` has fraction field `L`. -/
theorem isFractionRing_of_algebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic A L]
(inj : ∀ x, algebraMap A L x = 0 → x = 0) : IsFractionRing C L :=
{ map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
IsUnit.mk0 _
(show algebraMap C L y ≠ 0 from fun h =>
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hy
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap C L)).mp (algebraMap_injective C A L) _ h))
surj' := fun z =>
let ⟨x, hx, int⟩ := (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic z).exists_integral_multiple
⟨⟨mk' C _ int, algebraMap _ _ x, mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero fun h ↦
hx (inj _ <| by rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A C L, h, RingHom.map_zero])⟩, by
rw [algebraMap_mk', ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A C L, Algebra.smul_def, mul_comm]⟩
exists_of_eq := fun {x y} h => ⟨1, by simpa using algebraMap_injective C A L h⟩ }
variable (K L)
/-- If the field `L` is a finite extension of the fraction field of the integral domain `A`,
the integral closure `C` of `A` in `L` has fraction field `L`. -/
theorem isFractionRing_of_finite_extension [IsDomain A] [Algebra K L] [IsScalarTower A K L]
[FiniteDimensional K L] : IsFractionRing C L :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic A L := IsFractionRing.comap_isAlgebraic_iff.mpr
(inferInstanceAs (Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L))
isFractionRing_of_algebraic A C
fun _ hx =>
IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp
((map_eq_zero <| algebraMap K L).mp <| (IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm.trans hx)
end IsIntegralClosure
namespace integralClosure
variable {L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open Algebra
/-- If the field `L` is an algebraic extension of the integral domain `A`,
the integral closure of `A` in `L` has fraction field `L`. -/
theorem isFractionRing_of_algebraic [Algebra A L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic A L]
(inj : ∀ x, algebraMap A L x = 0 → x = 0) : IsFractionRing (integralClosure A L) L :=
IsIntegralClosure.isFractionRing_of_algebraic A (integralClosure A L) inj
variable (K L)
/-- If the field `L` is a finite extension of the fraction field of the integral domain `A`,
the integral closure of `A` in `L` has fraction field `L`. -/
theorem isFractionRing_of_finite_extension [IsDomain A] [Algebra A L] [Algebra K L]
[IsScalarTower A K L] [FiniteDimensional K L] : IsFractionRing (integralClosure A L) L :=
IsIntegralClosure.isFractionRing_of_finite_extension A K L (integralClosure A L)
end integralClosure
namespace IsFractionRing
variable (R S K)
/-- `S` is algebraic over `R` iff a fraction ring of `S` is algebraic over `R` -/
theorem isAlgebraic_iff' [Field K] [IsDomain R] [Algebra R K] [Algebra S K]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R K] [IsFractionRing S K] [IsScalarTower R S K] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic R S ↔ Algebra.IsAlgebraic R K := by
simp only [Algebra.isAlgebraic_def]
constructor
· intro h x
letI := MulActionWithZero.nontrivial S K
letI := FractionRing.liftAlgebra R K
have := FractionRing.isScalarTower_liftAlgebra R K
rw [IsFractionRing.isAlgebraic_iff R (FractionRing R) K, isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
obtain ⟨a : S, b, ha, rfl⟩ := div_surjective (A := S) x
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ := h b
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine IsIntegral.mul ?_ ?_
· rw [← isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
refine .extendScalars
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R (FractionRing R)) ?_
exact .algebraMap (h a)
· rw [← isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
use (f.map (algebraMap R (FractionRing R))).reverse
constructor
· rwa [Ne, Polynomial.reverse_eq_zero, ← Polynomial.degree_eq_bot,
Polynomial.degree_map_eq_of_injective
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R (FractionRing R)),
Polynomial.degree_eq_bot]
· have : Invertible (algebraMap S K b) :=
IsUnit.invertible
(isUnit_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h =>
nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero ha
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap S K)).1
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) b h)))
rw [Polynomial.aeval_def, ← invOf_eq_inv, Polynomial.eval₂_reverse_eq_zero_iff,
Polynomial.eval₂_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, ← Polynomial.aeval_def,
Polynomial.aeval_algebraMap_apply, hf₂, RingHom.map_zero]
· intro h x
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ := h (algebraMap S K x)
use f, hf₁
rw [Polynomial.aeval_algebraMap_apply] at hf₂
exact
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap S K)).1 (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) _
hf₂
open nonZeroDivisors
variable {S K}
/-- If the `S`-multiples of `a` are contained in some `R`-span, then `Frac(S)`-multiples of `a`
are contained in the equivalent `Frac(R)`-span. -/
theorem ideal_span_singleton_map_subset {L : Type*} [IsDomain R] [IsDomain S] [Field K] [Field L]
[Algebra R K] [Algebra R L] [Algebra S L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic R S] [IsFractionRing S L]
[Algebra K L] [IsScalarTower R S L] [IsScalarTower R K L] {a : S} {b : Set S}
(inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R L))
(h : (Ideal.span ({a} : Set S) : Set S) ⊆ Submodule.span R b) :
(Ideal.span ({algebraMap S L a} : Set L) : Set L) ⊆ Submodule.span K (algebraMap S L '' b) := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mp hx
obtain ⟨y', z', rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective S⁰ x'
obtain ⟨y, z, hz0, yz_eq⟩ :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.exists_smul_eq_mul R y' (nonZeroDivisors.coe_ne_zero z')
have injRS : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S) := by
refine
Function.Injective.of_comp (show Function.Injective (algebraMap S L ∘ algebraMap R S) from ?_)
rwa [← RingHom.coe_comp, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
have hz0' : algebraMap R S z ∈ S⁰ :=
map_mem_nonZeroDivisors (algebraMap R S) injRS (mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero hz0)
have mk_yz_eq : IsLocalization.mk' L y' z' = IsLocalization.mk' L y ⟨_, hz0'⟩ := by
rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_comm _ y, mul_comm _ y'] at yz_eq
exact IsLocalization.mk'_eq_of_eq (by rw [mul_comm _ y, mul_comm _ y', yz_eq])
suffices hy : algebraMap S L (a * y) ∈ Submodule.span K ((algebraMap S L) '' b) by
rw [mk_yz_eq, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R K L, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← map_inv₀, ←
Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul]
exact (Submodule.span K _).smul_mem _ hy
refine Submodule.span_subset_span R K _ ?_
rw [Submodule.span_algebraMap_image_of_tower]
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to specify the value of `f` here:
exact Submodule.mem_map_of_mem (f := LinearMap.restrictScalars _ _)
(h (Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨y, rfl⟩))
| end IsFractionRing
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-23")]
alias isAlgebraic_of_isLocalization := IsLocalization.isAlgebraic
open nonZeroDivisors in
lemma isAlgebraic_of_isFractionRing {R S} (K L) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Field K] [CommRing L]
[Algebra R S] [Algebra R K] [Algebra R L] [Algebra S L] [Algebra K L] [IsScalarTower R S L]
[IsScalarTower R K L] [IsFractionRing S L]
[Algebra.IsIntegral R S] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L := by
constructor
intro x
obtain ⟨x, s, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective S⁰ x
apply IsIntegral.isAlgebraic
rw [IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one]
apply RingHom.IsIntegralElem.mul
· apply IsIntegral.tower_top (R := R)
apply IsIntegral.map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S L)
exact Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x
· show IsIntegral _ _
rw [← isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral, ← IsAlgebraic.invOf_iff, isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
apply IsIntegral.tower_top (R := R)
apply IsIntegral.map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S L)
exact Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (s : S)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integral.lean | 429 | 458 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn,
Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-! # getD and getI
This file provides theorems for working with the `getD` and `getI` functions. These are used to
access an element of a list by numerical index, with a default value as a fallback when the index
is out of range.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
namespace List
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : List α) (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ)
section getD
variable (d : α)
theorem getD_eq_getElem {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) : l.getD n d = l[n] := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp at hn
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n
· exact getD_cons_zero
· exact ih _
| theorem getD_map {n : ℕ} (f : α → β) : (map f l).getD n (f d) = f (l.getD n d) := by simp
theorem getD_eq_default {n : ℕ} (hn : l.length ≤ n) : l.getD n d = d := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => exact getD_nil
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n
| Mathlib/Data/List/GetD.lean | 38 | 44 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.