Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Partrec
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
/-!
# Gödel Numbering for Partial Recursive Functions.
This file defines `Nat.Partrec.Code`, an inductive datatype describing code for partial
recursive functions on ℕ. It defines an encoding for these codes, and proves that the constructors
are primitive recursive with respect to the encoding.
It also defines the evaluation of these codes as partial functions using `PFun`, and proves that a
function is partially recursive (as defined by `Nat.Partrec`) if and only if it is the evaluation
of some code.
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.Partrec.Code`: Inductive datatype for partial recursive codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`: A (computable) encoding of codes as natural numbers.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode`: The inverse of this encoding.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`: The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
## Main Results
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_computable`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.smn`: The $S_n^m$ theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.exists_code`: Partial recursiveness is equivalent to being the eval of a code.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_prim`: `evaln` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point`: Roger's fixed point theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point₂`: Kleene's second recursion theorem.
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open Encodable Denumerable
namespace Nat.Partrec
theorem rfind' {f} (hf : Nat.Partrec f) :
Nat.Partrec
(Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)) :=
Partrec₂.unpaired'.2 <| by
refine
Partrec.map
((@Partrec₂.unpaired' fun a b : ℕ =>
Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + b))).1
?_)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst).to_comp.to₂
have : Nat.Partrec (fun a => Nat.rfind (fun n => (fun m => decide (m = 0)) <$>
Nat.unpaired (fun a b => f (Nat.pair (Nat.unpair a).1 (b + (Nat.unpair a).2)))
(Nat.pair a n))) :=
rfind
(Partrec₂.unpaired'.2
((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hf).comp
(Primrec₂.pair.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd
(Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst))).to_comp))
simpa
/-- Code for partial recursive functions from ℕ to ℕ.
See `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval` for the interpretation of these constructors.
-/
inductive Code : Type
| zero : Code
| succ : Code
| left : Code
| right : Code
| pair : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| prec : Code → Code → Code
| rfind' : Code → Code
compile_inductive% Code
end Nat.Partrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
instance instInhabited : Inhabited Code :=
⟨zero⟩
/-- Returns a code for the constant function outputting a particular natural. -/
protected def const : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => comp succ (Code.const n)
theorem const_inj : ∀ {n₁ n₂}, Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₁ = Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₂ → n₁ = n₂
| 0, 0, _ => by simp
| n₁ + 1, n₂ + 1, h => by
dsimp [Nat.Partrec.Code.const] at h
injection h with h₁ h₂
simp only [const_inj h₂]
/-- A code for the identity function. -/
protected def id : Code :=
pair left right
/-- Given a code `c` taking a pair as input, returns a code using `n` as the first argument to `c`.
-/
def curry (c : Code) (n : ℕ) : Code :=
comp c (pair (Code.const n) Code.id)
/-- An encoding of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a ℕ. -/
def encodeCode : Code → ℕ
| zero => 0
| succ => 1
| left => 2
| right => 3
| pair cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 4
| comp cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg) + 1) + 4
| prec cf cg => (2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 1) + 4
| rfind' cf => (2 * (2 * encodeCode cf + 1) + 1) + 4
/--
A decoder for `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`, taking any ℕ to the `Nat.Partrec.Code` it represents.
-/
def ofNatCode : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| 1 => succ
| 2 => left
| 3 => right
| n + 4 =>
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
match n.bodd, n.div2.bodd with
| false, false => pair (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| false, true => comp (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , false => prec (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , true => rfind' (ofNatCode m)
/-- Proof that `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode` is the inverse of `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode` -/
private theorem encode_ofNatCode : ∀ n, encodeCode (ofNatCode n) = n
| 0 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 1 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 2 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 3 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| n + 4 => by
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
have IH := encode_ofNatCode m
have IH1 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.1
have IH2 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.2
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.bit_decomp n, ← Nat.bit_decomp n.div2]
simp only [ofNatCode.eq_5]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;>
simp [m, encodeCode, ofNatCode, IH, IH1, IH2, Nat.bit_val]
instance instDenumerable : Denumerable Code :=
mk'
⟨encodeCode, ofNatCode, fun c => by
induction c <;> simp [encodeCode, ofNatCode, Nat.div2_val, *],
encode_ofNatCode⟩
theorem encodeCode_eq : encode = encodeCode :=
rfl
theorem ofNatCode_eq : ofNat Code = ofNatCode :=
rfl
theorem encode_lt_pair (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (pair cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (pair cf cg) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (Nat.pair cf.encodeCode cg.encodeCode) (by decide : 1 ≤ 2 * 2)
rw [one_mul, mul_assoc] at this
have := lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (by decide : 0 < 4))
exact ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.left_le_pair _ _) this, lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.right_le_pair _ _) this⟩
theorem encode_lt_comp (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (comp cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (comp cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (comp cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_prec (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (prec cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (prec cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (prec cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_rfind' (cf) : encode cf < encode (rfind' cf) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
omega
end Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Primrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
theorem pair_prim : Primrec₂ pair :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
| (Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem comp_prim : Primrec₂ comp :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
| Mathlib/Computability/PartrecCode.lean | 218 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Ackermann function
In this file, we define the two-argument Ackermann function `ack`. Despite having a recursive
definition, we show that this isn't a primitive recursive function.
## Main results
- `exists_lt_ack_of_nat_primrec`: any primitive recursive function is pointwise bounded above by
`ack m` for some `m`.
- `not_primrec₂_ack`: the two-argument Ackermann function is not primitive recursive.
## Proof approach
We very broadly adapt the proof idea from
https://www.planetmath.org/ackermannfunctionisnotprimitiverecursive. Namely, we prove that for any
primitive recursive `f : ℕ → ℕ`, there exists `m` such that `f n < ack m n` for all `n`. This then
implies that `fun n => ack n n` can't be primitive recursive, and so neither can `ack`. We aren't
able to use the same bounds as in that proof though, since our approach of using pairing functions
differs from their approach of using multivariate functions.
The important bounds we show during the main inductive proof (`exists_lt_ack_of_nat_primrec`)
are the following. Assuming `∀ n, f n < ack a n` and `∀ n, g n < ack b n`, we have:
- `∀ n, pair (f n) (g n) < ack (max a b + 3) n`.
- `∀ n, g (f n) < ack (max a b + 2) n`.
- `∀ n, Nat.rec (f n.unpair.1) (fun (y IH : ℕ) => g (pair n.unpair.1 (pair y IH)))
n.unpair.2 < ack (max a b + 9) n`.
The last one is evidently the hardest. Using `unpair_add_le`, we reduce it to the more manageable
- `∀ m n, rec (f m) (fun (y IH : ℕ) => g (pair m (pair y IH))) n <
ack (max a b + 9) (m + n)`.
We then prove this by induction on `n`. Our proof crucially depends on `ack_pair_lt`, which is
applied twice, giving us a constant of `4 + 4`. The rest of the proof consists of simpler bounds
which bump up our constant to `9`.
-/
open Nat
/-- The two-argument Ackermann function, defined so that
- `ack 0 n = n + 1`
- `ack (m + 1) 0 = ack m 1`
- `ack (m + 1) (n + 1) = ack m (ack (m + 1) n)`.
This is of interest as both a fast-growing function, and as an example of a recursive function that
isn't primitive recursive. -/
def ack : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| 0, n => n + 1
| m + 1, 0 => ack m 1
| m + 1, n + 1 => ack m (ack (m + 1) n)
@[simp]
theorem ack_zero (n : ℕ) : ack 0 n = n + 1 := by rw [ack]
@[simp]
theorem ack_succ_zero (m : ℕ) : ack (m + 1) 0 = ack m 1 := by rw [ack]
@[simp]
theorem ack_succ_succ (m n : ℕ) : ack (m + 1) (n + 1) = ack m (ack (m + 1) n) := by rw [ack]
@[simp]
theorem ack_one (n : ℕ) : ack 1 n = n + 2 := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
| · simp [IH]
| Mathlib/Computability/Ackermann.lean | 78 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Trigonometric
/-!
# Complex and real exponential
In this file we prove continuity of `Complex.exp` and `Real.exp`. We also prove a few facts about
limits of `Real.exp` at infinity.
## Tags
exp
-/
noncomputable section
open Asymptotics Bornology Finset Filter Function Metric Set Topology
open scoped Nat
namespace Complex
variable {z y x : ℝ}
theorem exp_bound_sq (x z : ℂ) (hz : ‖z‖ ≤ 1) :
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z * exp x‖ = ‖exp x * (exp z - 1 - z)‖ := by
congr
rw [exp_add]
ring
_ = ‖exp x‖ * ‖exp z - 1 - z‖ := norm_mul _ _
_ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le hz) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem locally_lipschitz_exp {r : ℝ} (hr_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) (hr_le : r ≤ 1) (x y : ℂ)
(hyx : ‖y - x‖ < r) : ‖exp y - exp x‖ ≤ (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
have hy_eq : y = x + (y - x) := by abel
have hyx_sq_le : ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 ≤ r * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [pow_two]
exact mul_le_mul hyx.le le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hr_nonneg
have h_sq : ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ 1 → ‖exp (x + z) - exp x‖ ≤ ‖z‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
intro z hz
have : ‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := exp_bound_sq x z hz
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add', ← norm_smul z]
exact (norm_sub_norm_le _ _).trans this
calc
‖exp y - exp x‖ = ‖exp (x + (y - x)) - exp x‖ := by nth_rw 1 [hy_eq]
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 := h_sq (y - x) (hyx.le.trans hr_le)
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * (r * ‖y - x‖) :=
(add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul le_rfl hyx_sq_le (sq_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
_ = (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
-- Porting note: proof by term mode `locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x`
-- doesn't work because `‖y - x‖` and `dist y x` don't unify
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x =>
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one (2 * ‖exp x‖)
(fun y ↦ by
convert locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x y using 2
congr
ring)
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
rcases (zero_le n).eq_or_lt with rfl | hn
· simpa using continuous_exp.continuousAt.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
· refine .of_bound (n.succ / (n ! * n)) ?_
rw [NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt.eventually_iff]
refine ⟨1, one_pos, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
convert exp_bound hx.out.le hn using 1
field_simp [mul_comm]
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Complex
section ComplexContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Complex
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {z : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℂ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.cexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => exp (f y)) s x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.cexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y => exp (f y)) x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.cexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun y => exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.cexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y => exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => h.continuousAt.cexp
/-- The complex exponential function is uniformly continuous on left half planes. -/
lemma UniformContinuousOn.cexp (a : ℝ) : UniformContinuousOn exp {x : ℂ | x.re ≤ a} := by
have : Continuous (cexp - 1) := Continuous.sub (Continuous.cexp continuous_id') continuous_one
rw [Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff, Metric.continuous_iff'] at *
intro ε hε
simp only [gt_iff_lt, Pi.sub_apply, Pi.one_apply, dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right,
sub_add_cancel] at this
have ha : 0 < ε / (2 * Real.exp a) := by positivity
have H := this 0 (ε / (2 * Real.exp a)) ha
rw [Metric.eventually_nhds_iff] at H
obtain ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := H
refine ⟨δ, hδ.1, ?_⟩
intros x _ y hy hxy
have h3 := hδ.2 (y := x - y) (by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using hxy)
rw [dist_eq_norm, exp_zero] at *
have : cexp x - cexp y = cexp y * (cexp (x - y) - 1) := by
rw [mul_sub_one, ← exp_add]
ring_nf
rw [this, mul_comm]
have hya : ‖cexp y‖ ≤ Real.exp a := by
simp only [norm_exp, Real.exp_le_exp]
exact hy
simp only [gt_iff_lt, dist_zero_right, Set.mem_setOf_eq, norm_mul, Complex.norm_exp] at *
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul h3.le hya (Real.exp_nonneg y.re) (le_of_lt ha))
have hrr : ε / (2 * a.exp) * a.exp = ε / 2 := by
nth_rw 2 [mul_comm]
field_simp [mul_assoc]
rw [hrr]
exact div_two_lt_of_pos hε
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-11")] alias UniformlyContinuousOn.cexp := UniformContinuousOn.cexp
end ComplexContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.cexp
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℝ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
have := (Complex.exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow n).comp_tendsto
(Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto' 0 0 rfl)
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
norm_cast at this
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Real
section RealContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Real
theorem Filter.Tendsto.rexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {z : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.rexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.rexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.rexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.rexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y ↦ exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ h.continuousAt.rexp
end RealContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
variable {α : Type*} {x y z : ℝ} {l : Filter α}
theorem exp_half (x : ℝ) : exp (x / 2) = √(exp x) := by
rw [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, sq, ← exp_add, add_halves] <;> exact (exp_pos _).le
/-- The real exponential function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_atTop : Tendsto exp atTop atTop := by
have A : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x + 1) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop 1 tendsto_id
have B : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, x + 1 ≤ exp x := eventually_atTop.2 ⟨0, fun x _ => add_one_le_exp x⟩
exact tendsto_atTop_mono' atTop B A
/-- The real exponential function tends to `0` at `-∞` or, equivalently, `exp(-x)` tends to `0`
at `+∞` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun x => exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_exp_atTop).congr fun x => (exp_neg x).symm
/-- The real exponential function tends to `1` at `0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one : Tendsto exp (𝓝 0) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_exp.tendsto 0
simp
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr fun x =>
congr_arg exp <| neg_neg x
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_exp_atBot, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall exp_pos⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsWithin := tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_exp_comp (l : Filter α) (f : α → ℝ) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => exp (f x) :=
isBoundedUnder_of ⟨0, fun _ => (exp_pos _).le⟩
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
exp_monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp_iff tendsto_exp_atTop
/-- The function `exp(x)/x^n` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop (n : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun x => exp x / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
refine (atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff (atTop_basis' 1)).2 fun C hC₁ => ?_
have hC₀ : 0 < C := zero_lt_one.trans_le hC₁
have : 0 < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos (exp_pos _) hC₀)
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ N, (↑k : ℝ) ^ n / exp 1 ^ k < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ :=
eventually_atTop.1
((tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt n (one_lt_exp_iff.2 zero_lt_one)).eventually
(gt_mem_nhds this))
simp only [← exp_nat_mul, mul_one, div_lt_iff₀, exp_pos, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hN
refine ⟨N, trivial, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hx
have hx₀ : 0 < x := (Nat.cast_nonneg N).trans_lt hx
rw [Set.mem_Ici, le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos hx₀ _), ← le_div_iff₀' hC₀]
calc
x ^ n ≤ ⌈x⌉₊ ^ n := by gcongr; exact Nat.le_ceil _
_ ≤ exp ⌈x⌉₊ / (exp 1 * C) := mod_cast (hN _ (Nat.lt_ceil.2 hx).le).le
_ ≤ exp (x + 1) / (exp 1 * C) := by gcongr; exact (Nat.ceil_lt_add_one hx₀.le).le
_ = exp x / C := by rw [add_comm, exp_add, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (exp_pos _).ne']
/-- The function `x^n * exp(-x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n * exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)).congr fun x => by
rw [comp_apply, inv_eq_one_div, div_div_eq_mul_div, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, exp_neg]
/-- The function `(b * exp x + c) / (x ^ n)` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is positive. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x => (b * exp x + c) / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp only [pow_zero, div_one]
exact (tendsto_exp_atTop.const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [add_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact
((tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n).const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add
(tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_pow_atTop hn))
/-- The function `(x ^ n) / (b * exp x + c)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n / (b * exp x + c)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have H : ∀ d e, 0 < d → Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n / (d * exp x + e)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
intro b' c' h
convert (tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop b' c' n h).inv_tendsto_atTop using 1
ext x
simp
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hb with h | h
· exact H b c h
· convert (H (-b) (-c) (neg_pos.mpr h)).neg using 1
· ext x
field_simp
rw [← neg_add (b * exp x) c, neg_div_neg_eq]
· rw [neg_zero]
/-- `Real.exp` as an order isomorphism between `ℝ` and `(0, +∞)`. -/
def expOrderIso : ℝ ≃o Ioi (0 : ℝ) :=
StrictMono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ (exp_strictMono.codRestrict exp_pos) <|
(continuous_exp.subtype_mk _).surjective
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atTop]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atTop])
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atBot]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT])
@[simp]
theorem coe_expOrderIso_apply (x : ℝ) : (expOrderIso x : ℝ) = exp x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_expOrderIso : (↑) ∘ expOrderIso = exp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : range exp = Set.Ioi 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, range_comp, expOrderIso.range_eq, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atTop : map exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, OrderIso.map_atTop, map_val_Ioi_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_atTop : comap exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← map_exp_atTop, comap_map exp_injective, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_exp_comp_atTop {f : α → ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := exp), ← tendsto_comap_iff, comap_exp_atTop]
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atTop {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (g := exp), ← tendsto_map'_iff, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atBot : map exp atBot = 𝓝[>] 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, expOrderIso.map_atBot, ← map_coe_Ioi_atBot]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero : comap exp (𝓝[>] 0) = atBot := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, comap_map exp_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_exp_nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero := comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atBot {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] 0) l := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhds_zero : comap exp (𝓝 0) = atBot :=
(comap_nhdsWithin_range exp 0).symm.trans <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_exp_comp_nhds_zero {f : α → ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 0) ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := exp), ← tendsto_comap_iff, comap_exp_nhds_zero]
theorem isOpenEmbedding_exp : IsOpenEmbedding exp :=
isOpen_Ioi.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.comp expOrderIso.toHomeomorph.isOpenEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_nhds (x : ℝ) : map exp (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (exp x) :=
isOpenEmbedding_exp.map_nhds_eq x
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhds_exp (x : ℝ) : comap exp (𝓝 (exp x)) = 𝓝 x :=
(isOpenEmbedding_exp.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
theorem isLittleO_pow_exp_atTop {n : ℕ} : (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n) =o[atTop] Real.exp := by
simpa [isLittleO_iff_tendsto fun x hx => ((exp_pos x).ne' hx).elim] using
tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop 1 0 n zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_exp_comp_exp_comp {f g : α → ℝ} :
((fun x => exp (f x)) =O[l] fun x => exp (g x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (f - g) :=
Iff.trans (isBigO_iff_isBoundedUnder_le_div <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => exp_ne_zero _) <| by
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, ← exp_sub, isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp, Pi.sub_def]
@[simp]
theorem isTheta_exp_comp_exp_comp {f g : α → ℝ} :
((fun x => exp (f x)) =Θ[l] fun x => exp (g x)) ↔
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => |f x - g x| := by
simp only [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, ← isBoundedUnder_le_neg, neg_sub, IsTheta,
isBigO_exp_comp_exp_comp, Pi.sub_def]
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp {f g : α → ℝ} :
((fun x => exp (f x)) =o[l] fun x => exp (g x)) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => g x - f x) l atTop := by
simp only [isLittleO_iff_tendsto, exp_ne_zero, ← exp_sub, ← tendsto_neg_atTop_iff, false_imp_iff,
imp_true_iff, tendsto_exp_comp_nhds_zero, neg_sub]
theorem isLittleO_one_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
((fun _ => 1 : α → ℝ) =o[l] fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp only [← exp_zero, isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp, sub_zero]
/-- `Real.exp (f x)` is bounded away from zero along a filter if and only if this filter is bounded
from below under `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_one_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
((fun _ => 1 : α → ℝ) =O[l] fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f := by
simp only [← exp_zero, isBigO_exp_comp_exp_comp, Pi.sub_def, zero_sub, isBoundedUnder_le_neg]
/-- `Real.exp (f x)` is bounded away from zero along a filter if and only if this filter is bounded
from below under `f`. -/
theorem isBigO_exp_comp_one {f : α → ℝ} :
(fun x => exp (f x)) =O[l] (fun _ => 1 : α → ℝ) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by
simp only [isBigO_one_iff, norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp]
/-- `Real.exp (f x)` is bounded away from zero and infinity along a filter `l` if and only if
`|f x|` is bounded from above along this filter. -/
@[simp]
theorem isTheta_exp_comp_one {f : α → ℝ} :
(fun x => exp (f x)) =Θ[l] (fun _ => 1 : α → ℝ) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => |f x| := by
simp only [← exp_zero, isTheta_exp_comp_exp_comp, sub_zero]
lemma summable_exp_nat_mul_iff {a : ℝ} :
Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ exp (n * a)) ↔ a < 0 := by
simp only [exp_nat_mul, summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one, norm_of_nonneg (exp_nonneg _),
exp_lt_one_iff]
lemma summable_exp_neg_nat : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ exp (-n) := by
simpa only [mul_neg_one] using summable_exp_nat_mul_iff.mpr neg_one_lt_zero
lemma summable_pow_mul_exp_neg_nat_mul (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ n ^ k * exp (-r * n) := by
simp_rw [mul_comm (-r), exp_nat_mul]
apply summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
| rwa [norm_of_nonneg (exp_nonneg _), exp_lt_one_iff, neg_lt_zero]
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Exp.lean | 435 | 437 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.SlashInvariantForms
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.CongruenceSubgroups
/-!
# Identities of ModularForms and SlashInvariantForms
Collection of useful identities of modular forms.
-/
noncomputable section
open ModularForm UpperHalfPlane Matrix CongruenceSubgroup
namespace SlashInvariantForm
/- TODO: Once we have cusps, do this more generally, same below. -/
theorem vAdd_width_periodic (N : ℕ) (k n : ℤ) (f : SlashInvariantForm (Gamma N) k) (z : ℍ) :
f (((N * n) : ℝ) +ᵥ z) = f z := by
norm_cast
rw [← modular_T_zpow_smul z (N * n)]
convert slash_action_eqn' f (ModularGroup_T_pow_mem_Gamma N (N * n) (Int.dvd_mul_right N n)) z
simp only [Fin.isValue, ModularGroup.coe_T_zpow (N * n), of_apply, cons_val', cons_val_zero,
empty_val', cons_val_fin_one, cons_val_one, head_fin_const, Int.cast_zero, zero_mul, head_cons,
Int.cast_one, zero_add, one_zpow, one_mul]
theorem T_zpow_width_invariant (N : ℕ) (k n : ℤ) (f : SlashInvariantForm (Gamma N) k) (z : ℍ) :
f (((ModularGroup.T ^ (N * n))) • z) = f z := by
| rw [modular_T_zpow_smul z (N * n)]
simpa only [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast] using vAdd_width_periodic N k n f z
end SlashInvariantForm
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/Identities.lean | 34 | 37 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
/-!
# Equivalent conditions for DVR
In `IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE`, we show that the following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
- `R` is a discrete valuation ring
- `R` is a valuation ring
- `R` is a dedekind domain
- `R` is integrally closed with a unique prime ideal
- `m` is principal
- `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
- Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
open scoped Multiplicative
open IsLocalRing Module
theorem exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal [IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(h' : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal) (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n := by
by_cases h : IsField R
· let _ := h.toField
exact ⟨0, by simp [(eq_bot_or_eq_top I).resolve_left hI]⟩
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx : _ = Ideal.span _⟩ := h'
by_cases hI' : I = ⊤
· use 0; rw [pow_zero, hI', Ideal.one_eq_top]
have H : ∀ r : R, ¬IsUnit r ↔ x ∣ r := fun r =>
(SetLike.ext_iff.mp hx r).trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
have : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
apply Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField (maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) h
simp [hx]
have hx' := IsDiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal x this hx
have H' : ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → r ∈ nonunits R → ∃ n : ℕ, Associated (x ^ n) r := by
intro r hr₁ hr₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, rfl, hf₂⟩ := (WfDvdMonoid.not_unit_iff_exists_factors_eq r hr₁).mp hr₂
have : ∀ b ∈ f, Associated x b := by
intro b hb
exact Irreducible.associated_of_dvd hx' (hf₁ b hb) ((H b).mp (hf₁ b hb).1)
clear hr₁ hr₂ hf₁
induction' f using Multiset.induction with fa fs fh
· exact (hf₂ rfl).elim
rcases eq_or_ne fs ∅ with (rfl | hf')
· use 1
rw [pow_one, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.empty_eq_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, mul_one]
exact this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := fh hf' fun b hb => this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hb)
use n + 1
rw [pow_add, Multiset.prod_cons, mul_comm, pow_one]
exact Associated.mul_mul (this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)) hn
have : ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ : ∃ r : R, r ∈ I ∧ r ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! h; apply hI; rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact h
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' r hr₂ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hr₁)
use n
rwa [← I.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem u.isUnit, mul_comm]
use Nat.find this
apply le_antisymm
· change ∀ s ∈ I, s ∈ _
by_contra! hI''
obtain ⟨s, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := hI''
apply hs₂
by_cases hs₃ : s = 0; · rw [hs₃]; exact zero_mem _
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' s hs₃ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hs₁)
rw [mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem _ u.isUnit] at hs₁ ⊢
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.find_min' this hs₁)
apply Ideal.pow_mem_pow
exact (H _).mpr (dvd_refl _)
· rw [hx, Ideal.span_singleton_pow, Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact Nat.find_spec this
theorem maximalIdeal_isPrincipal_of_isDedekindDomain [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
[IsDedekindDomain R] : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal := by
classical
by_cases ne_bot : maximalIdeal R = ⊥
· rw [ne_bot]; infer_instance
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ : ∃ a ∈ maximalIdeal R, a ≠ (0 : R) := by
by_contra! h'; apply ne_bot; rwa [eq_bot_iff]
have hle : Ideal.span {a} ≤ maximalIdeal R := by rwa [Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
have : (Ideal.span {a}).radical = maximalIdeal R := by
rw [Ideal.radical_eq_sInf]
apply le_antisymm
· exact sInf_le ⟨hle, inferInstance⟩
· refine
le_sInf fun I hI =>
(eq_maximalIdeal <| hI.2.isMaximal (fun e => ha₂ ?_)).ge
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff, ← e]; exact hI.1
have : ∃ n, maximalIdeal R ^ n ≤ Ideal.span {a} := by
rw [← this]; apply Ideal.exists_radical_pow_le_of_fg; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
rcases hn : Nat.find this with - | n
· have := Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top] at this
exact (Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top inferInstance (eq_top_iff.mpr <| this.trans hle)).elim
obtain ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ : ∃ b ∈ maximalIdeal R ^ n, ¬b ∈ Ideal.span {a} := by
by_contra! h'; rw [Nat.find_eq_iff] at hn; exact hn.2 n n.lt_succ_self fun x hx => h' x hx
have hb₃ : ∀ m ∈ maximalIdeal R, ∃ k : R, k * a = b * m := by
intro m hm; rw [← Ideal.mem_span_singleton']; apply Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_succ]; exact Ideal.mul_mem_mul hb₁ hm
have hb₄ : b ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; apply hb₂; exact zero_mem _
let K := FractionRing R
let x : K := algebraMap R K b / algebraMap R K a
let M := Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R K) (maximalIdeal R)
have ha₃ : algebraMap R K a ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.not.mpr ha₂
by_cases hx : ∀ y ∈ M, x * y ∈ M
· have := isIntegral_of_smul_mem_submodule M ?_ ?_ x hx
· obtain ⟨y, e⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.algebraMap_eq_of_integral this
refine (hb₂ (Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨y, ?_⟩)).elim
apply IsFractionRing.injective R K
rw [map_mul, e, div_mul_cancel₀ _ ha₃]
· rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff]; refine ⟨_, ⟨a, ha₁, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact (IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff (K := K)).not.mpr ha₂
· apply Submodule.FG.map; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
· have :
(M.map (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R K x)).comap (Algebra.linearMap R K) = ⊤ := by
by_contra h; apply hx
rintro m' ⟨m, hm, rfl : algebraMap R K m = m'⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm
have hk' : x * algebraMap R K m = algebraMap R K k := by
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, ← map_mul, ← hk, map_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha₃]
exact ⟨k, le_maximalIdeal h ⟨_, ⟨_, hm, rfl⟩, hk'⟩, hk'.symm⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ : ∃ y ∈ maximalIdeal R, b * y = a := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_comap] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hy' : x * algebraMap R K y = algebraMap R K 1⟩ := this
rw [map_one, ← mul_div_right_comm, div_eq_one_iff_eq ha₃, ← map_mul] at hy'
exact ⟨y, hy, IsFractionRing.injective R K hy'⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, ?_⟩⟩
apply le_antisymm
· intro m hm; obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm; rw [← hy₂, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at hk
rw [← mul_left_cancel₀ hb₄ hk, mul_comm]; exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
· rwa [Submodule.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
/--
Let `(R, m, k)` be a noetherian local domain (possibly a field).
The following are equivalent:
0. `R` is a PID
1. `R` is a valuation ring
2. `R` is a dedekind domain
3. `R` is integrally closed with at most one non-zero prime ideal
4. `m` is principal
5. `dimₖ m/m² ≤ 1`
6. Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE` for a version assuming `¬ IsField R`.
-/
theorem tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain
[IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R] :
List.TFAE
| [IsPrincipalIdealRing R, ValuationRing R, IsDedekindDomain R,
IsIntegrallyClosed R ∧ ∀ P : Ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ → P.IsPrime → P = maximalIdeal R,
(maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal,
finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) ≤ 1,
∀ I ≠ ⊥, ∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := fun _ ↦ inferInstance
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun _ ↦ ((IsBezout.TFAE (R := R)).out 0 1).mp ‹_›
tfae_have 1 → 4
| H => ⟨inferInstance, fun P hP hP' ↦ eq_maximalIdeal (hP'.isMaximal hP)⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 :=
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ { h₁ with maximalOfPrime := (h₂ _ · · ▸ maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) }
tfae_have 3 → 5 := fun h ↦ maximalIdeal_isPrincipal_of_isDedekindDomain R
tfae_have 6 ↔ 5 := finrank_cotangentSpace_le_one_iff
tfae_have 5 → 7 := exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal R
tfae_have 7 → 2 := by
rw [ValuationRing.iff_ideal_total]
intro H
constructor
intro I J
by_cases hI : I = ⊥; · subst hI; left; exact bot_le
by_cases hJ : J = ⊥; · subst hJ; right; exact bot_le
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := H I hI
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := H J hJ
exact (le_total m n).imp Ideal.pow_le_pow_right Ideal.pow_le_pow_right
tfae_finish
/--
The following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
0. `R` is a discrete valuation ring
1. `R` is a valuation ring
2. `R` is a dedekind domain
3. `R` is integrally closed with a unique non-zero prime ideal
4. `m` is principal
5. `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
6. Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
theorem IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE [IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DiscreteValuationRing/TFAE.lean | 166 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.AbsMax
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Schwarz lemma
In this file we prove several versions of the Schwarz lemma.
* `Complex.norm_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball`, `Complex.abs_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball`: if
`f : ℂ → E` sends an open disk with center `c` and a positive radius `R₁` to an open ball with
center `f c` and radius `R₂`, then the norm of the derivative of `f` at `c` is at most
the ratio `R₂ / R₁`;
* `Complex.dist_le_div_mul_dist_of_mapsTo_ball`: if `f : ℂ → E` sends an open disk with center `c`
and radius `R₁` to an open disk with center `f c` and radius `R₂`, then for any `z` in the former
disk we have `dist (f z) (f c) ≤ (R₂ / R₁) * dist z c`;
* `Complex.abs_deriv_le_one_of_mapsTo_ball`: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk of positive radius
to itself and the center of this disk to itself, then the norm of the derivative of `f`
at the center of this disk is at most `1`;
* `Complex.dist_le_dist_of_mapsTo_ball_self`: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk to itself and the
center `c` of this disk to itself, then for any point `z` of this disk we have
`dist (f z) c ≤ dist z c`;
* `Complex.abs_le_abs_of_mapsTo_ball_self`: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk with center `0` to
itself, then for any point `z` of this disk we have `abs (f z) ≤ abs z`.
## Implementation notes
We prove some versions of the Schwarz lemma for a map `f : ℂ → E` taking values in any normed space
over complex numbers.
## TODO
* Prove that these inequalities are strict unless `f` is an affine map.
* Prove that any diffeomorphism of the unit disk to itself is a Möbius map.
## Tags
Schwarz lemma
-/
open Metric Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology
namespace Complex
section Space
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {R₁ R₂ : ℝ} {f : ℂ → E}
{c z z₀ : ℂ}
/-- An auxiliary lemma for `Complex.norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball`. -/
theorem schwarz_aux {f : ℂ → ℂ} (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂)) (hz : z ∈ ball c R₁) :
‖dslope f c z‖ ≤ R₂ / R₁ := by
have hR₁ : 0 < R₁ := nonempty_ball.1 ⟨z, hz⟩
suffices ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[<] R₁, ‖dslope f c z‖ ≤ R₂ / r by
refine ge_of_tendsto ?_ this
exact (tendsto_const_nhds.div tendsto_id hR₁.ne').mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
rw [mem_ball] at hz
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT hz] with r hr
have hr₀ : 0 < r := dist_nonneg.trans_lt hr.1
replace hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ (dslope f c) (ball c r) := by
refine DifferentiableOn.diffContOnCl ?_
rw [closure_ball c hr₀.ne']
exact ((differentiableOn_dslope <| ball_mem_nhds _ hR₁).mpr hd).mono
(closedBall_subset_ball hr.2)
refine norm_le_of_forall_mem_frontier_norm_le isBounded_ball hd ?_ ?_
· rw [frontier_ball c hr₀.ne']
intro z hz
have hz' : z ≠ c := ne_of_mem_sphere hz hr₀.ne'
rw [dslope_of_ne _ hz', slope_def_module, norm_smul, norm_inv, mem_sphere_iff_norm.1 hz, ←
div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hr₀, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact le_of_lt (h_maps (mem_ball.2 (by rw [mem_sphere.1 hz]; exact hr.2)))
· rw [closure_ball c hr₀.ne', mem_closedBall]
exact hr.1.le
/-- Two cases of the **Schwarz Lemma** (derivative and distance), merged together. -/
theorem norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂)) (hz : z ∈ ball c R₁) :
‖dslope f c z‖ ≤ R₂ / R₁ := by
have hR₁ : 0 < R₁ := nonempty_ball.1 ⟨z, hz⟩
have hR₂ : 0 < R₂ := nonempty_ball.1 ⟨f z, h_maps hz⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (dslope f c z) 0 with hc | hc
· rw [hc, norm_zero]; exact div_nonneg hR₂.le hR₁.le
rcases exists_dual_vector ℂ _ hc with ⟨g, hg, hgf⟩
have hg' : ‖g‖₊ = 1 := NNReal.eq hg
have hg₀ : ‖g‖₊ ≠ 0 := by simpa only [hg'] using one_ne_zero
calc
‖dslope f c z‖ = ‖dslope (g ∘ f) c z‖ := by
rw [g.dslope_comp, hgf, RCLike.norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact fun _ => hd.differentiableAt (ball_mem_nhds _ hR₁)
_ ≤ R₂ / R₁ := by
refine schwarz_aux (g.differentiable.comp_differentiableOn hd) (MapsTo.comp ?_ h_maps) hz
simpa only [hg', NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using g.lipschitz.mapsTo_ball hg₀ (f c) R₂
/-- Equality case in the **Schwarz Lemma**: in the setup of `norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball`, if
`‖dslope f c z₀‖ = R₂ / R₁` holds at a point in the ball then the map `f` is affine. -/
theorem affine_of_mapsTo_ball_of_exists_norm_dslope_eq_div [CompleteSpace E] [StrictConvexSpace ℝ E]
(hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁)) (h_maps : Set.MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂))
(h_z₀ : z₀ ∈ ball c R₁) (h_eq : ‖dslope f c z₀‖ = R₂ / R₁) :
Set.EqOn f (fun z => f c + (z - c) • dslope f c z₀) (ball c R₁) := by
set g := dslope f c
rintro z hz
by_cases h : z = c; · simp [h]
have h_R₁ : 0 < R₁ := nonempty_ball.mp ⟨_, h_z₀⟩
have g_le_div : ∀ z ∈ ball c R₁, ‖g z‖ ≤ R₂ / R₁ := fun z hz =>
norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball hd h_maps hz
have g_max : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ g) (ball c R₁) z₀ :=
isMaxOn_iff.mpr fun z hz => by simpa [h_eq] using g_le_div z hz
have g_diff : DifferentiableOn ℂ g (ball c R₁) :=
(differentiableOn_dslope (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self h_R₁))).mpr hd
have : g z = g z₀ := eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn_norm (convex_ball c R₁).isPreconnected
isOpen_ball g_diff h_z₀ g_max hz
simp only [g] at this
simp [g, ← this]
theorem affine_of_mapsTo_ball_of_exists_norm_dslope_eq_div' [CompleteSpace E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁))
(h_maps : Set.MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂))
(h_z₀ : ∃ z₀ ∈ ball c R₁, ‖dslope f c z₀‖ = R₂ / R₁) :
∃ C : E, ‖C‖ = R₂ / R₁ ∧ Set.EqOn f (fun z => f c + (z - c) • C) (ball c R₁) :=
let ⟨z₀, h_z₀, h_eq⟩ := h_z₀
⟨dslope f c z₀, h_eq, affine_of_mapsTo_ball_of_exists_norm_dslope_eq_div hd h_maps h_z₀ h_eq⟩
/-- The **Schwarz Lemma**: if `f : ℂ → E` sends an open disk with center `c` and a positive radius
`R₁` to an open ball with center `f c` and radius `R₂`, then the norm of the derivative of
`f` at `c` is at most the ratio `R₂ / R₁`. -/
theorem norm_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂)) (h₀ : 0 < R₁) : ‖deriv f c‖ ≤ R₂ / R₁ := by
simpa only [dslope_same] using norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball hd h_maps (mem_ball_self h₀)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball :=
norm_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball
/-- The **Schwarz Lemma**: if `f : ℂ → E` sends an open disk with center `c` and radius `R₁` to an
open ball with center `f c` and radius `R₂`, then for any `z` in the former disk we have
`dist (f z) (f c) ≤ (R₂ / R₁) * dist z c`. -/
theorem dist_le_div_mul_dist_of_mapsTo_ball (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R₁))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R₁) (ball (f c) R₂)) (hz : z ∈ ball c R₁) :
dist (f z) (f c) ≤ R₂ / R₁ * dist z c := by
rcases eq_or_ne z c with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [dist_self, mul_zero, le_rfl]
simpa only [dslope_of_ne _ hne, slope_def_module, norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ←
dist_eq_norm, div_le_iff₀ (dist_pos.2 hne)] using norm_dslope_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball hd h_maps hz
end Space
variable {f : ℂ → ℂ} {c z : ℂ} {R R₁ R₂ : ℝ}
/-- The **Schwarz Lemma**: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk of positive radius to itself and the
center of this disk to itself, then the norm of the derivative of `f` at the center of
this disk is at most `1`. -/
theorem norm_deriv_le_one_of_mapsTo_ball (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R) (ball c R)) (hc : f c = c) (h₀ : 0 < R) : ‖deriv f c‖ ≤ 1 :=
(norm_deriv_le_div_of_mapsTo_ball hd (by rwa [hc]) h₀).trans_eq (div_self h₀.ne')
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_deriv_le_one_of_mapsTo_ball :=
norm_deriv_le_one_of_mapsTo_ball
/-- The **Schwarz Lemma**: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk to itself and the center `c` of this
disk to itself, then for any point `z` of this disk we have `dist (f z) c ≤ dist z c`. -/
theorem dist_le_dist_of_mapsTo_ball_self (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball c R))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball c R) (ball c R)) (hc : f c = c) (hz : z ∈ ball c R) :
dist (f z) c ≤ dist z c := by
have := dist_le_div_mul_dist_of_mapsTo_ball hd (by rwa [hc]) hz
rwa [hc, div_self, one_mul] at this
exact (nonempty_ball.1 ⟨z, hz⟩).ne'
/-- The **Schwarz Lemma**: if `f : ℂ → ℂ` sends an open disk with center `0` to itself, then for any
point `z` of this disk we have `‖f z‖ ≤ ‖z‖`. -/
theorem norm_le_norm_of_mapsTo_ball_self (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f (ball 0 R))
(h_maps : MapsTo f (ball 0 R) (ball 0 R)) (h₀ : f 0 = 0) (hz : ‖z‖ < R) :
‖f z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ := by
| replace hz : z ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) R := mem_ball_zero_iff.2 hz
simpa only [dist_zero_right] using dist_le_dist_of_mapsTo_ball_self hd h_maps h₀ hz
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_le_abs_of_mapsTo_ball_self :=
norm_le_norm_of_mapsTo_ball_self
end Complex
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Schwarz.lean | 185 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
induction' l with b l IH
· rw [map_nil, dlookup_nil, dlookup_nil, Option.map_none']
| · rw [map_cons]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.map_some']
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ h, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ (fun he => h <| hf he), IH]
theorem dlookup_map₁ {β : Type v} (l : List (Σ _ : α, β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, x.2⟩ : List (Σ _ : α', β)).dlookup (f a) = l.dlookup a := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 219 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.NatCast
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Ordered rings and semirings
This file develops the basics of ordered (semi)rings.
Each typeclass here comprises
* an algebraic class (`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`)
* an order class (`PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`)
* assumptions on how both interact ((strict) monotonicity, canonicity)
For short,
* "`+` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of addition"
* "`+` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of addition"
* "`*` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of multiplication by a nonnegative number".
* "`*` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of multiplication by a positive number".
## Typeclasses
* `OrderedSemiring`: Semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect `≤`.
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respects
`<`.
* `OrderedCommSemiring`: Commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect
`≤`.
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+`
and `*` respect `<`.
* `OrderedRing`: Ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `OrderedCommRing`: Commutative ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such that `+`
respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedRing`: Nontrivial ring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*`
respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`: Nontrivial commutative ring with a linear order such that `+` respects
`≤` and `*` respects `<`.
## Hierarchy
The hardest part of proving order lemmas might be to figure out the correct generality and its
corresponding typeclass. Here's an attempt at demystifying it. For each typeclass, we list its
immediate predecessors and what conditions are added to each of them.
* `OrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `≤`
- `Semiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `≤`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommSemiring`
- `OrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `CommSemiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedRing`
- `OrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommRing`
- `OrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `StrictOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommRing` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & nontriviality & `*` respects `<`
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
* `LinearOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
open Function
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered semiring is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R where
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
/-- A strict ordered semiring is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
class IsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the left
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `c * a < c * b`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the right
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `a * c < b * c`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial
lemma IsOrderedRing.of_mul_nonneg [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] (mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b) :
IsOrderedRing R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ hc (sub_nonneg.2 ab)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ (sub_nonneg.2 ab) hc
lemma IsStrictOrderedRing.of_mul_pos [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [Nontrivial R] (mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b) :
IsStrictOrderedRing R where
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ hc (sub_pos.2 ab)
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ (sub_pos.2 ab) hc
section IsOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toPosMulMono : PosMulMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ h x.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toMulPosMono : MulPosMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ h x.2
end IsOrderedRing
/-- Turn an ordered domain into a strict ordered ring. -/
lemma IsOrderedRing.toIsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*)
[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
IsStrictOrderedRing R :=
.of_mul_pos fun _ _ ap bp ↦ (mul_nonneg ap.le bp.le).lt_of_ne' (mul_ne_zero ap.ne' bp.ne')
section IsStrictOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toPosMulStrictMono : PosMulStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toMulPosStrictMono : MulPosStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing R where
__ := ‹IsStrictOrderedRing R›
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toCharZero :
CharZero R where
cast_injective :=
(strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply lt_add_one).injective
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder R :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a + 1, lt_add_of_pos_right _ one_pos⟩⟩
end IsStrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrder
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors R where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab := by
contrapose! hab
obtain ha | ha := hab.1.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hab.2.lt_or_lt
exacts [(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha hb).ne', (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha hb).ne,
(mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ha hb).ne, (mul_pos ha hb).ne']
-- Note that we can't use `NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain` since we are merely in a semiring.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain : IsDomain R where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero {a b c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_left ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_left_of_pos ha).injective h]
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero {b a c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_right ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_right_of_pos ha).injective h]
end LinearOrder
/-! Note that `OrderDual` does not satisfy any of the ordered ring typeclasses due to the
`zero_le_one` field. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedSemiring` is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedAddCommMonoid R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered semiring. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends OrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ha hc :=
-- parentheses ensure this generates an `optParam` rather than an `autoParam`
(by simpa only [mul_comm] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ha hc)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered ring. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of non-negative elements is non-negative. -/
protected mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone
and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends OrderedRing R, CommRing R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid R,
Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- Left multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- Right multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that
addition is strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is strictly monotone
and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered ring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of two positive elements is positive. -/
protected mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommRing (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedRing R, CommRing R
/- It's not entirely clear we should assume `Nontrivial` at this point; it would be reasonable to
explore changing this, but be warned that the instances involving `Domain` may cause typeclass
search loops. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that
addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` is a nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such
that addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedCommSemiring R,
LinearOrderedSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedRing` is a ring with a linear order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedRing R, LinearOrder R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a linear order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends LinearOrderedRing R, CommMonoid R
attribute [nolint docBlame]
StrictOrderedSemiring.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
StrictOrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
LinearOrderedSemiring.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedRing.toLinearOrder
OrderedSemiring.toOrderedAddCommMonoid
OrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
StrictOrderedCommRing.toCommRing
OrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
OrderedCommRing.toCommRing
StrictOrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
LinearOrderedCommSemiring.toLinearOrderedSemiring
LinearOrderedCommRing.toCommMonoid
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b c : R}
lemma one_add_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : a + b + b * c ≤ c) : 1 + a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_add_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : a + c + b * c ≤ b) : 1 + a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : b + b * c ≤ a + c) : 1 - a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm c]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : c + b * c ≤ a + b) : 1 - a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm b]
gcongr
end OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs.lean | 396 | 397 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.UniformLimitsDeriv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
/-!
# Smoothness of series
We show that series of functions are differentiable, or smooth, when each individual
function in the series is and additionally suitable uniform summable bounds are satisfied.
More specifically,
* `differentiable_tsum` ensures that a series of differentiable functions is differentiable.
* `contDiff_tsum` ensures that a series of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also give versions of these statements which are localized to a set.
-/
open Set Metric TopologicalSpace Function Asymptotics Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
variable {α β 𝕜 E F : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [CompleteSpace F] {u : α → ℝ}
/-! ### Differentiability -/
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : α → E → F} {f' : α → E → E →L[𝕜] F} {g : α → 𝕜 → F} {g' : α → 𝕜 → F} {v : ℕ → α → ℝ}
{s : Set E} {t : Set 𝕜} {x₀ x : E} {y₀ y : 𝕜} {N : ℕ∞}
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x` on a preconnected open set. If the series converges
at a point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the
derivatives, then the series converges everywhere on the set. -/
theorem summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable (f · x₀))
(hx : x ∈ s) : Summable fun n => f n x := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset] at hf0 ⊢
have A : UniformCauchySeqOn (fun t : Finset α => fun x => ∑ i ∈ t, f' i x) atTop s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf').uniformCauchySeqOn
refine cauchy_map_of_uniformCauchySeqOn_fderiv (f := fun t x ↦ ∑ i ∈ t, f i x)
hs h's A (fun t y hy => ?_) hx₀ hx hf0
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun i _ => hf i y hy
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x` on a preconnected open set. If the series converges
at a point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the
derivatives, then the series converges everywhere on the set. -/
theorem summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (ht : IsOpen t)
(h't : IsPreconnected t) (hg : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hy₀ : y₀ ∈ t) (hg0 : Summable (g · y₀))
(hy : y ∈ t) : Summable fun n => g n y := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg
refine summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu ht h't hg ?_ hy₀ hg0 hy
simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x` on a preconnected open set. If the series converges
at a point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the
derivatives, then the series is differentiable on the set and its derivative is the sum of the
derivatives. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀)
(hx : x ∈ s) : HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) (∑' n, f' n x) x := by
classical
have A :
∀ x : E, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun t : Finset α => ∑ n ∈ t, f n x) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n x)) := by
intro y hy
apply Summable.hasSum
exact summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu hs h's hf hf' hx₀ hf0 hy
refine hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOn hs (tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf')
(fun t y hy => ?_) A hx
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun n _ => hf n y hy
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x` on a preconnected open set. If the series converges
at a point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the
derivatives, then the series is differentiable on the set and its derivative is the sum of the
derivatives. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (ht : IsOpen t)
(h't : IsPreconnected t) (hg : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hy₀ : y₀ ∈ t) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀)
(hy : y ∈ t) : HasDerivAt (fun z => ∑' n, g n z) (∑' n, g' n y) y := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg ⊢
convert hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu ht h't hg ?_ hy₀ hg0 hy
· exact (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL 𝕜 𝕜 F 1).map_tsum <|
.of_norm_bounded u hu fun n ↦ hg' n y hy
· simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If the series converges at a
point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the derivatives,
then the series converges everywhere. -/
theorem summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt (hu : Summable u)
(hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x) (hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n)
(hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) (x : E) : Summable fun n => f n x := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let _ : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
exact summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hf n x) (fun n x _ => hf' n x) (mem_univ _) hf0 (mem_univ _)
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If the series converges at a
point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the derivatives,
then the series converges everywhere. -/
theorem summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt (hu : Summable u)
(hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y) (hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n)
(hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) (y : 𝕜) : Summable fun n => g n y := by
exact summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hg n x) (fun n x _ => hg' n x) (mem_univ _) hg0 (mem_univ _)
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If the series converges at a
point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the derivatives,
then the series is differentiable and its derivative is the sum of the derivatives. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) (∑' n, f' n x) x := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
exact hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hf n x) (fun n x _ => hf' n x) (mem_univ _) hf0 (mem_univ _)
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If the series converges at a
point, and all functions in the series are differentiable with a summable bound on the derivatives,
then the series is differentiable and its derivative is the sum of the derivatives. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) (y : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (fun z => ∑' n, g n z) (∑' n, g' n y) y := by
exact hasDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n y _ => hg n y) (fun n y _ => hg' n y) (mem_univ _) hg0 (mem_univ _)
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If all functions in the series are differentiable
with a summable bound on the derivatives, then the series is differentiable.
Note that our assumptions do not ensure the pointwise convergence, but if there is no pointwise
convergence then the series is zero everywhere so the result still holds. -/
theorem differentiable_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => ∑' n, f n y := by
by_cases h : ∃ x₀, Summable fun n => f n x₀
· rcases h with ⟨x₀, hf0⟩
intro x
exact (hasFDerivAt_tsum hu hf hf' hf0 x).differentiableAt
· push_neg at h
have : (fun x => ∑' n, f n x) = 0 := by ext1 x; exact tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (h x)
rw [this]
exact differentiable_const 0
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' n, f n x`. If all functions in the series are differentiable
with a summable bound on the derivatives, then the series is differentiable.
Note that our assumptions do not ensure the pointwise convergence, but if there is no pointwise
convergence then the series is zero everywhere so the result still holds. -/
theorem differentiable_tsum' (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun z => ∑' n, g n z := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg
refine differentiable_tsum hu hg ?_
simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
theorem fderiv_tsum_apply (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n, Differentiable 𝕜 (f n))
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖fderiv 𝕜 (f n) x‖ ≤ u n) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) x = ∑' n, fderiv 𝕜 (f n) x :=
(hasFDerivAt_tsum hu (fun n x => (hf n x).hasFDerivAt) hf' hf0 _).fderiv
theorem deriv_tsum_apply (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n, Differentiable 𝕜 (g n))
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖deriv (g n) y‖ ≤ u n) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) (y : 𝕜) :
deriv (fun z => ∑' n, g n z) y = ∑' n, deriv (g n) y :=
(hasDerivAt_tsum hu (fun n y => (hg n y).hasDerivAt) hg' hg0 _).deriv
theorem fderiv_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n, Differentiable 𝕜 (f n))
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖fderiv 𝕜 (f n) x‖ ≤ u n) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) :
(fderiv 𝕜 fun y => ∑' n, f n y) = fun x => ∑' n, fderiv 𝕜 (f n) x := by
ext1 x
exact fderiv_tsum_apply hu hf hf' hf0 x
theorem deriv_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n, Differentiable 𝕜 (g n))
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖deriv (g n) y‖ ≤ u n) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) :
(deriv fun y => ∑' n, g n y) = fun y => ∑' n, deriv (g n) y := by
ext1 x
exact deriv_tsum_apply hu hg hg' hg0 x
/-! ### Higher smoothness -/
/-- Consider a series of `C^n` functions, with summable uniform bounds on the successive
derivatives. Then the iterated derivative of the sum is the sum of the iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_tsum (hf : ∀ i, ContDiff 𝕜 N (f i))
(hv : ∀ k : ℕ, (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N → Summable (v k))
(h'f : ∀ (k : ℕ) (i : α) (x : E), (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N → ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f i) x‖ ≤ v k i) {k : ℕ}
(hk : (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k fun y => ∑' n, f n y) = fun x => ∑' n, iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f n) x := by
induction' k with k IH
· ext1 x
simp_rw [iteratedFDeriv_zero_eq_comp]
exact (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm.toContinuousLinearEquiv.map_tsum
· have h'k : (k : ℕ∞) < N := lt_of_lt_of_le (WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)) hk
have A : Summable fun n => iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f n) 0 :=
.of_norm_bounded (v k) (hv k h'k.le) fun n => h'f k n 0 h'k.le
simp_rw [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_left, IH h'k.le]
rw [fderiv_tsum (hv _ hk) (fun n => (hf n).differentiable_iteratedFDeriv
(mod_cast h'k)) _ A]
· ext1 x
exact (continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin (k + 1) => E) F).symm.toContinuousLinearEquiv.map_tsum
· intro n x
simpa only [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_left, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, comp_apply]
using h'f k.succ n x hk
/-- Consider a series of smooth functions, with summable uniform bounds on the successive
derivatives. Then the iterated derivative of the sum is the sum of the iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_tsum_apply (hf : ∀ i, ContDiff 𝕜 N (f i))
(hv : ∀ k : ℕ, (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N → Summable (v k))
(h'f : ∀ (k : ℕ) (i : α) (x : E), (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N → ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f i) x‖ ≤ v k i) {k : ℕ}
(hk : (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N) (x : E) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) x = ∑' n, iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f n) x := by
rw [iteratedFDeriv_tsum hf hv h'f hk]
/-- Consider a series of functions `∑' i, f i x`. Assume that each individual function `f i` is of
| class `C^N`, and moreover there is a uniform summable upper bound on the `k`-th derivative
for each `k ≤ N`. Then the series is also `C^N`. -/
theorem contDiff_tsum (hf : ∀ i, ContDiff 𝕜 N (f i)) (hv : ∀ k : ℕ, (k : ℕ∞) ≤ N → Summable (v k))
(h'f : ∀ (k : ℕ) (i : α) (x : E), k ≤ N → ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 k (f i) x‖ ≤ v k i) :
ContDiff 𝕜 N fun x => ∑' i, f i x := by
rw [contDiff_iff_continuous_differentiable]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/SmoothSeries.lean | 219 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Topology on the set of filters on a type
This file introduces a topology on `Filter α`. It is generated by the sets
`Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`, `s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and
only if it is a union of a family of these basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`.
This topology has the following important properties.
* If `X` is a topological space, then the map `𝓝 : X → Filter X` is a topology inducing map.
* In particular, it is a continuous map, so `𝓝 ∘ f` tends to `𝓝 (𝓝 a)` whenever `f` tends to `𝓝 a`.
* If `X` is an ordered topological space with order topology and no max element, then `𝓝 ∘ f` tends
to `𝓝 Filter.atTop` whenever `f` tends to `Filter.atTop`.
* It turns `Filter X` into a T₀ space and the order on `Filter X` is the dual of the
`specializationOrder (Filter X)`.
## Tags
filter, topological space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open Filter Topology
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β X Y : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-- The topology on `Filter α` is generated by the sets `Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`,
`s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and only if it is a union of a family of these
basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace (Filter α) :=
generateFrom <| range <| Iic ∘ 𝓟
theorem isOpen_Iic_principal {s : Set α} : IsOpen (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
GenerateOpen.basic _ (mem_range_self _)
theorem isOpen_setOf_mem {s : Set α} : IsOpen { l : Filter α | s ∈ l } := by
simpa only [Iic_principal] using isOpen_Iic_principal
theorem isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal :
IsTopologicalBasis (range (Iic ∘ 𝓟 : Set α → Set (Filter α))) :=
{ exists_subset_inter := by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩ l hl
exact ⟨Iic (𝓟 s) ∩ Iic (𝓟 t), ⟨s ∩ t, by simp⟩, hl, Subset.rfl⟩
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun _ => ⟨Iic ⊤, ⟨univ, congr_arg Iic principal_univ⟩,
mem_Iic.2 le_top⟩
eq_generateFrom := rfl }
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (Filter α)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∃ T : Set (Set α), s = ⋃ t ∈ T, Iic (𝓟 t) :=
isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal.open_iff_eq_sUnion.trans <| by
simp only [exists_subset_range_and_iff, sUnion_image, (· ∘ ·)]
theorem nhds_eq (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' (Iic ∘ 𝓟) :=
nhds_generateFrom.trans <| by
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (l ∈ _), iInf_and, iInf_range, Filter.lift', Filter.lift,
(· ∘ ·), mem_Iic, le_principal_iff]
theorem nhds_eq' (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' fun s => { l' | s ∈ l' } := by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, Iic_principal] using nhds_eq l
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {f : α → Filter β} :
Tendsto f la (𝓝 lb) ↔ ∀ s ∈ lb, ∀ᶠ a in la, s ∈ f a := by
simp only [nhds_eq', tendsto_lift', mem_setOf_eq]
protected theorem HasBasis.nhds {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => Iic (𝓟 (s i)) := by
rw [nhds_eq]
exact h.lift' monotone_principal.Iic
protected theorem tendsto_pure_self (l : Filter X) :
Tendsto (pure : X → Filter X) l (𝓝 l) := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_nhds]
exact fun s hs ↦ Eventually.mono hs fun x ↦ id
/-- Neighborhoods of a countably generated filter is a countably generated filter. -/
instance {l : Filter α} [IsCountablyGenerated l] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 l) :=
let ⟨_b, hb⟩ := l.exists_antitone_basis
HasCountableBasis.isCountablyGenerated <| ⟨hb.nhds, Set.to_countable _⟩
theorem HasBasis.nhds' {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => { l' | s i ∈ l' } := by simpa only [Iic_principal] using h.nhds
protected theorem mem_nhds_iff {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, Iic (𝓟 t) ⊆ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds.mem_iff
theorem mem_nhds_iff' {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, ∀ ⦃l' : Filter α⦄, t ∈ l' → l' ∈ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds'.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bot : 𝓝 (⊥ : Filter α) = pure ⊥ := by
simp [nhds_eq, Function.comp_def, lift'_bot monotone_principal.Iic]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ := by simp [nhds_eq]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_principal (s : Set α) : 𝓝 (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
(hasBasis_principal s).nhds.eq_of_same_basis (hasBasis_principal _)
@[simp]
theorem nhds_pure (x : α) : 𝓝 (pure x : Filter α) = 𝓟 {⊥, pure x} := by
rw [← principal_singleton, nhds_principal, principal_singleton, Iic_pure]
@[simp]
protected theorem nhds_iInf (f : ι → Filter α) : 𝓝 (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, 𝓝 (f i) := by
simp only [nhds_eq]
apply lift'_iInf_of_map_univ <;> simp
@[simp]
protected theorem nhds_inf (l₁ l₂ : Filter α) : 𝓝 (l₁ ⊓ l₂) = 𝓝 l₁ ⊓ 𝓝 l₂ := by
simpa only [iInf_bool_eq] using Filter.nhds_iInf fun b => cond b l₁ l₂
theorem monotone_nhds : Monotone (𝓝 : Filter α → Filter (Filter α)) :=
Monotone.of_map_inf Filter.nhds_inf
theorem sInter_nhds (l : Filter α) : ⋂₀ { s | s ∈ 𝓝 l } = Iic l := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq, Function.comp_def, sInter_lift'_sets monotone_principal.Iic, Iic,
le_principal_iff, ← setOf_forall, ← Filter.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_mono {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : 𝓝 l₁ ≤ 𝓝 l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => monotone_nhds h⟩
rw [← Iic_subset_Iic, ← sInter_nhds, ← sInter_nhds]
exact sInter_subset_sInter h
protected theorem mem_interior {s : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} :
l ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, Iic (𝓟 t) ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Filter.mem_nhds_iff]
protected theorem mem_closure {s : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} :
l ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ l, ∃ l' ∈ s, t ∈ l' := by
simp only [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, Filter.mem_interior, mem_compl_iff, not_exists,
not_forall, Classical.not_not, exists_prop, not_and, and_comm, subset_def, mem_Iic,
le_principal_iff]
@[simp]
protected theorem closure_singleton (l : Filter α) : closure {l} = Ici l := by
ext l'
simp [Filter.mem_closure, Filter.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem specializes_iff_le {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : l₁ ⤳ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ := by
simp only [specializes_iff_closure_subset, Filter.closure_singleton, Ici_subset_Ici]
instance : T0Space (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => (specializes_iff_le.1 h.specializes).antisymm
(specializes_iff_le.1 h.symm.specializes)⟩
theorem nhds_atTop [Preorder α] : 𝓝 atTop = ⨅ x : α, 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 (Ici x))) := by
simp only [atTop, Filter.nhds_iInf, nhds_principal]
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_atTop_iff [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → Filter β} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 atTop) ↔ ∀ y, ∀ᶠ a in l, Ici y ∈ f a := by
simp only [nhds_atTop, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iic, le_principal_iff]
theorem nhds_atBot [Preorder α] : 𝓝 atBot = ⨅ x : α, 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 (Iic x))) :=
@nhds_atTop αᵒᵈ _
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_atBot_iff [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → Filter β} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 atBot) ↔ ∀ y, ∀ᶠ a in l, Iic y ∈ f a :=
@Filter.tendsto_nhds_atTop_iff α βᵒᵈ _ _ _
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem nhds_nhds (x : X) :
𝓝 (𝓝 x) = ⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsOpen s) (_ : x ∈ s), 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 s)) := by
simp only [(nhds_basis_opens x).nhds.eq_biInf, iInf_and, @iInf_comm _ (_ ∈ _)]
theorem isInducing_nhds : IsInducing (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
isInducing_iff_nhds.2 fun x =>
(nhds_def' _).trans <| by
simp +contextual only [nhds_nhds, comap_iInf, comap_principal,
Iic_principal, preimage_setOf_eq, ← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, setOf_mem_eq,
IsOpen.interior_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_nhds := isInducing_nhds
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_nhds : Continuous (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
isInducing_nhds.continuous
protected theorem Tendsto.nhds {f : α → X} {l : Filter α} {x : X} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto (𝓝 ∘ f) l (𝓝 (𝓝 x)) :=
(continuous_nhds.tendsto _).comp h
end Filter
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {s : Set X}
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nhds (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (𝓝 ∘ f) s x :=
h.nhds
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.nhds (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (𝓝 ∘ f) x :=
h.nhds
protected nonrec theorem ContinuousOn.nhds (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (𝓝 ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).nhds
| protected nonrec theorem Continuous.nhds (h : Continuous f) : Continuous (𝓝 ∘ f) :=
Filter.continuous_nhds.comp h
| Mathlib/Topology/Filter.lean | 217 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectL
section sectR
lemma uIcc_map_sectR [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectR c _) = uIcc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectR : (Icc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Icc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectR : (Ioc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectR : (Ico a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ico (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectR : (Ioo a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioo (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectR
end Prod
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : #(Ioi a) = #(Ici a) - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : #(Iio a) = #(Iic a) - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
lemma image_subset_Iic_sup [OrderBot α] [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) (s : Finset ι) :
s.image f ⊆ Iic (s.sup f) := by
refine fun i hi ↦ mem_Iic.2 ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 hi
exact le_sup hj
lemma subset_Iic_sup_id [OrderBot α] (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ Iic (s.sup id) :=
fun _ h ↦ mem_Iic.2 <| le_sup (f := id) h
| end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 796 | 798 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
end Distrib
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddMonoid` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using already-proved extensionality lemmas.
congr; ext : 1; assumption
theorem toDistrib_injective : Function.Injective (@toDistrib R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalSemiring
/-! ### NonAssocSemiring and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddMonoidWithOne`, `AddCommMonoidWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas.
-/
/- TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
namespace NonAssocSemiring
/- The best place to prove that the `NatCast` is determined by the other operations is probably in
an extensionality lemma for `AddMonoidWithOne`, in which case we may as well do the typeclasses
defined in `Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean` as well. -/
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h_zero : (inst₁.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero = (inst₂.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero :=
congrArg (fun inst => (inst.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero) h
have h_one' : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne :=
congrArg (@MulOneClass.toOne R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_mul
have h_one : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one :=
congrArg (@One.one R) h_one'
have : inst₁.toAddCommMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommMonoidWithOne := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast :=
congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
-- Split into `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `One` and `natCast` instances.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddCommGroup` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
congr; (ext : 1; assumption)
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
-- Use above extensionality lemma to prove injectivity by showing that `h_add` and `h_mul` hold.
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-! ### NonUnitalRing -/
namespace NonUnitalRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonUnitalRing
/-! ### NonAssocRing and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddGroupWithOne`, `AddCommGroupWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
| funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 224 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
π.eq_of_le_of_le (π.biUnionIndex_mem this) hJ (π.le_biUnionIndex this) (le_of_mem _ hJ')
theorem biUnion_assoc (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (πi' : Box ι → ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion fun J => (πi J).biUnion (πi' J)) =
(π.biUnion πi).biUnion fun J => πi' (π.biUnionIndex πi J) J := by
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro ⟨J₁, hJ₁, J₂, hJ₂, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₂⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂]
· rintro ⟨J₁, ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₁⟩, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, hJ₂, J₁, hJ₁, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₂ hJ₁] at hJ
/-- Create a `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` from a collection of possibly empty boxes by filtering out
the empty one if it exists. -/
def ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.eraseNone boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
rw [mem_eraseNone] at hJ
simpa only [WithBot.some_eq_coe, WithBot.coe_le_coe] using le_of_mem _ hJ
pairwiseDisjoint J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne := by
simp only [mem_coe, mem_eraseNone] at h₁ h₂
exact Box.disjoint_coe.1 (pairwise_disjoint h₁ h₂ (mt Option.some_inj.1 hne))
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {h₁ h₂} :
J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ∈ boxes :=
mem_eraseNone
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
(ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, ↑J := by
suffices ⋃ (J : Box ι) (_ : ↑J ∈ boxes), ↑J = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) by
simpa [ofWithBot, Prepartition.iUnion]
simp only [← Box.biUnion_coe_eq_coe, @iUnion_comm _ _ (Box ι), @iUnion_comm _ _ (@Eq _ _ _),
iUnion_iUnion_eq_right]
theorem ofWithBot_le {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ ↑J') :
ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint ≤ π := by
have : ∀ J : Box ι, ↑J ∈ boxes → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ J' := fun J hJ => by
simpa only [WithBot.coe_le_coe] using H J hJ WithBot.coe_ne_bot
simpa [ofWithBot, le_def]
theorem le_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ π, ∃ J' ∈ boxes, ↑J ≤ J') : π ≤ ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint := by
intro J hJ
rcases H J hJ with ⟨J', J'mem, hle⟩
lift J' to Box ι using ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot WithBot.coe_ne_bot hle
exact ⟨J', mem_ofWithBot.2 J'mem, WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 hle⟩
theorem ofWithBot_mono {boxes₁ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem₁ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₁ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₁ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
{boxes₂ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {le_of_mem₂ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₂, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₂ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₂ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ boxes₂, J ≤ J') :
ofWithBot boxes₁ le_of_mem₁ pairwise_disjoint₁ ≤
ofWithBot boxes₂ le_of_mem₂ pairwise_disjoint₂ :=
le_ofWithBot _ fun J hJ => H J (mem_ofWithBot.1 hJ) WithBot.coe_ne_bot
theorem sum_ofWithBot {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ boxes, Option.elim' 0 f J :=
Finset.sum_eraseNone _ _
open scoped Classical in
/-- Restrict a prepartition to a box. -/
def restrict (π : Prepartition I) (J : Box ι) : Prepartition J :=
ofWithBot (π.boxes.image fun J' : Box ι => J ⊓ J')
(fun J' hJ' => by
rcases Finset.mem_image.1 hJ' with ⟨J', -, rfl⟩
exact inf_le_left)
(by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, onFun, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_image]
rintro _ ⟨J₁, h₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨J₂, h₂, rfl⟩ Hne
have : J₁ ≠ J₂ := by
rintro rfl
exact Hne rfl
exact ((Box.disjoint_coe.2 <| π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ this).inf_left' _).inf_right' _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : WithBot (Box ι)) = ↑J ⊓ ↑J' := by
simp [restrict, eq_comm]
theorem mem_restrict' : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑J ∩ ↑J' := by
simp only [mem_restrict, ← Box.withBotCoe_inj, Box.coe_inf, Box.coe_coe]
@[mono]
theorem restrict_mono {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} (Hle : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.restrict J ≤ π₂.restrict J := by
classical
refine ofWithBot_mono fun J₁ hJ₁ hne => ?_
rw [Finset.mem_image] at hJ₁; rcases hJ₁ with ⟨J₁, hJ₁, rfl⟩
rcases Hle hJ₁ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩
exact ⟨_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hJ₂, inf_le_inf_left _ <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 hle⟩
theorem monotone_restrict : Monotone fun π : Prepartition I => restrict π J :=
fun _ _ => restrict_mono
/-- Restricting to a larger box does not change the set of boxes. We cannot claim equality
of prepartitions because they have different types. -/
theorem restrict_boxes_of_le (π : Prepartition I) (h : I ≤ J) : (π.restrict J).boxes = π.boxes := by
classical
simp only [restrict, ofWithBot, eraseNone_eq_biUnion]
refine Finset.image_biUnion.trans ?_
refine (Finset.biUnion_congr rfl ?_).trans Finset.biUnion_singleton_eq_self
intro J' hJ'
rw [inf_of_le_right, ← WithBot.some_eq_coe, Option.toFinset_some]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 ((π.le_of_mem hJ').trans h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_self : π.restrict I = π :=
injective_boxes <| restrict_boxes_of_le π le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_restrict : (π.restrict J).iUnion = (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) ∩ (π.iUnion) := by
simp [restrict, ← inter_iUnion, ← iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_biUnion (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (hJ : J ∈ π) :
(π.biUnion πi).restrict J = πi J := by
refine (eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (fun J₁ h₁ => ?_) ?_).symm
· refine (mem_restrict _).2 ⟨J₁, π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, h₁⟩, (inf_of_le_right ?_).symm⟩
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (le_of_mem _ h₁)
· simp only [iUnion_restrict, iUnion_biUnion, Set.subset_def, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iUnion]
rintro x ⟨hxJ, J₁, h₁, hx⟩
obtain rfl : J = J₁ := π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ h₁ hxJ (iUnion_subset _ hx)
exact hx
theorem biUnion_le_iff {πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J} {π' : Prepartition I} :
π.biUnion πi ≤ π' ↔ ∀ J ∈ π, πi J ≤ π'.restrict J := by
constructor <;> intro H J hJ
· rw [← π.restrict_biUnion πi hJ]
exact restrict_mono H
· rw [mem_biUnion] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J₁, h₁, hJ⟩
rcases H J₁ h₁ hJ with ⟨J₂, h₂, Hle⟩
rcases π'.mem_restrict.mp h₂ with ⟨J₃, h₃, H⟩
exact ⟨J₃, h₃, Hle.trans <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <| H.trans_le inf_le_right⟩
theorem le_biUnion_iff {πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J} {π' : Prepartition I} :
π' ≤ π.biUnion πi ↔ π' ≤ π ∧ ∀ J ∈ π, π'.restrict J ≤ πi J := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.trans (π.biUnion_le πi), fun J hJ => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← π.restrict_biUnion πi hJ]
exact restrict_mono H
· rintro ⟨H, Hi⟩ J' hJ'
rcases H hJ' with ⟨J, hJ, hle⟩
have : J' ∈ π'.restrict J :=
π'.mem_restrict.2 ⟨J', hJ', (inf_of_le_right <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 hle).symm⟩
| rcases Hi J hJ this with ⟨Ji, hJi, hlei⟩
exact ⟨Ji, π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJi⟩, hlei⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (Prepartition I) :=
{ inf := fun π₁ π₂ => π₁.biUnion fun J => π₂.restrict J
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 500 | 504 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.Basic
/-!
# Free abelian groups
The free abelian group on a type `α`, defined as the abelianisation of
the free group on `α`.
The free abelian group on `α` can be abstractly defined as the left adjoint of the
forgetful functor from abelian groups to types. Alternatively, one could define
it as the functions `α → ℤ` which send all but finitely many `(a : α)` to `0`,
under pointwise addition. In this file, it is defined as the abelianisation
of the free group on `α`. All the constructions and theorems required to show
the adjointness of the construction and the forgetful functor are proved in this
file, but the category-theoretic adjunction statement is in
`Algebra.Category.Group.Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
Here we use the following variables: `(α β : Type*) (A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A]`
* `FreeAbelianGroup α` : the free abelian group on a type `α`. As an abelian
group it is `α →₀ ℤ`, the functions from `α` to `ℤ` such that all but finitely
many elements get mapped to zero, however this is not how it is implemented.
* `lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` : the group homomorphism induced
by the map `f : α → A`.
* `map (f : α → β) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` : functoriality
of `FreeAbelianGroup`.
* `instance [Monoid α] : Semigroup (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
* `instance [CommMonoid α] : CommRing (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
It has been suggested that we would be better off refactoring this file
and using `Finsupp` instead.
## Implementation issues
The definition is `def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u := Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α`.
Chris Hughes has suggested that this all be rewritten in terms of `Finsupp`.
Johan Commelin has written all the API relating the definition to `Finsupp`
in the lean-liquid repo.
The lemmas `map_pure`, `map_of`, `map_zero`, `map_add`, `map_neg` and `map_sub`
are proved about the `Functor.map` `<$>` construction, and need `α` and `β` to
be in the same universe. But
`FreeAbelianGroup.map (f : α → β)` is defined to be the `AddGroup`
homomorphism `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` (with `α` and `β` now
allowed to be in different universes), so `(map f).map_add`
etc can be used to prove that `FreeAbelianGroup.map` preserves addition. The
functions `map_id`, `map_id_apply`, `map_comp`, `map_comp_apply` and `map_of_apply`
are about `FreeAbelianGroup.map`.
-/
universe u v
variable (α : Type u)
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is the free abelian group generated by `α`.
This is an abelian group equipped with a function
`FreeAbelianGroup.of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α` which has the following universal property:
if `G` is any abelian group, and `f : α → G` is any function, then this function is
the composite of `FreeAbelianGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeAbelianGroup.lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ G`.
A typical element of `FreeAbelianGroup α` is a formal sum of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x + x + x - y` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAbelianGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to `ℤ`.
One can think of `FreeAbelianGroup α` as the functions `α →₀ ℤ` with finite support,
and addition given pointwise.
TODO: rename to `FreeAddCommGroup` and introduce a multiplicative version
-/
def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u :=
Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α
-- FIXME: this is super broken, because the functions have type `Additive .. → ..`
-- instead of `FreeAbelianGroup α → ..` and those are not defeq!
instance FreeAbelianGroup.addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
@Additive.addCommGroup _ <| Abelianization.commGroup _
instance : Inhabited (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeAbelianGroup α) := by unfold FreeAbelianGroup; infer_instance
variable {α}
namespace FreeAbelianGroup
/-- The canonical map from `α` to `FreeAbelianGroup α`. -/
def of (x : α) : FreeAbelianGroup α :=
Additive.ofMul <| Abelianization.of <| FreeGroup.of x
/-- The map `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` induced by a map of types `α → A`. -/
def lift {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] : (α → β) ≃ (FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) :=
(@FreeGroup.lift _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans <|
(@Abelianization.lift _ _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans MonoidHom.toAdditive
namespace lift
variable {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] (f : α → β)
open FreeAbelianGroup
-- Porting note: needed to add `(β := Multiplicative β)` and `using 1`.
@[simp]
protected theorem of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := by
convert Abelianization.lift.of
(FreeGroup.lift f (β := Multiplicative β)) (FreeGroup.of x) using 1
exact (FreeGroup.lift.of (β := Multiplicative β)).symm
protected theorem unique (g : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (hg : ∀ x, g (of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ of = f)) _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
protected theorem ext (g h : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (H : ∀ x, g (of x) = h (of x)) : g = h :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext H
theorem map_hom {α β γ} [AddCommGroup β] [AddCommGroup γ] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) (f : α → β)
(g : β →+ γ) : g (lift f a) = lift (g ∘ f) a := by
show (g.comp (lift f)) a = lift (g ∘ f) a
apply lift.unique
intro a
show g ((lift f) (of a)) = g (f a)
simp only [(· ∘ ·), lift.of]
end lift
section
open scoped Classical in
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
fun x y hoxy ↦ Classical.by_contradiction fun hxy : x ≠ y ↦
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift fun z ↦ if x = z then (1 : ℤ) else 0
have hfx1 : f (of x) = 1 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_pos rfl
have hfy1 : f (of y) = 1 := hoxy ▸ hfx1
have hfy0 : f (of y) = 0 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_neg hxy
one_ne_zero <| hfy1.symm.trans hfy0
@[simp]
theorem of_ne_zero (x : α) : of x ≠ 0 := by
intro h
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift 1
have hfx : f (of x) = 1 := lift.of _ _
have hf0 : f (of x) = 0 := by rw [h, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero <| hfx.symm.trans hf0
|
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_of (x : α) : 0 ≠ of x := of_ne_zero _ |>.symm
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (FreeAbelianGroup α) where
exists_pair_ne := let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›; ⟨0, of x, zero_ne_of _⟩
end
attribute [local instance] QuotientGroup.leftRel
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeAbelianGroup.lean | 166 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
/-!
# Linear ordered (semi)fields
A linear ordered (semi)field is a (semi)field equipped with a linear order such that
* addition respects the order: `a ≤ b → c + a ≤ c + b`;
* multiplication of positives is positive: `0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b`;
* `0 < 1`.
## Main Definitions
* `LinearOrderedSemifield`: Typeclass for linear order semifields.
* `LinearOrderedField`: Typeclass for linear ordered fields.
-/
-- Guard against import creep.
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linear ordered semifield is a field with a linear order respecting the operations. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemifield (K : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommSemiring K, Semifield K
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linear ordered field is a field with a linear order respecting the operations. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedField (K : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommRing K, Field K
attribute [nolint docBlame] LinearOrderedSemifield.toSemifield LinearOrderedField.toField
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Defs.lean | 95 | 97 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.SeparatedMap
/-!
# Local homeomorphisms
This file defines local homeomorphisms.
## Main definitions
For a function `f : X → Y ` between topological spaces, we say
* `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if `f` is a local homeomorphism around each point of `s`: for each
`x : X`, the restriction of `f` to some open neighborhood `U` of `x` gives a homeomorphism
between `U` and an open subset of `Y`.
* `IsLocalHomeomorph f`: `f` is a local homeomorphism, i.e. it's a local homeomorphism on `univ`.
Note that `IsLocalHomeomorph` is a global condition. This is in contrast to
`PartialHomeomorph`, which is a homeomorphism between specific open subsets.
## Main results
* local homeomorphisms are locally injective open maps
* more!
-/
open Topology
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] (g : Y → Z)
(f : X → Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y)
/-- A function `f : X → Y` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if each `x ∈ s` is contained in
the source of some `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` with `f = e`. -/
def IsLocalHomeomorphOn :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ f = e
theorem isLocalHomeomorphOn_iff_isOpenEmbedding_restrict {f : X → Y} :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, IsOpenEmbedding (U.restrict f) := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨e, hxe, rfl⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨e.source, e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe, e.isOpenEmbedding_restrict⟩
· obtain ⟨U, hU, emb⟩ := h x hx
have : IsOpenEmbedding ((interior U).restrict f) := by
refine emb.comp ⟨.inclusion interior_subset, ?_⟩
rw [Set.range_inclusion]; exact isOpen_induced isOpen_interior
obtain ⟨cont, inj, openMap⟩ := isOpenEmbedding_iff_continuous_injective_isOpenMap.mp this
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
exact ⟨PartialHomeomorph.ofContinuousOpenRestrict
(Set.injOn_iff_injective.mpr inj).toPartialEquiv
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mpr cont) openMap isOpen_interior,
mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mpr hU, rfl⟩
namespace IsLocalHomeomorphOn
/-- Proves that `f` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`. The condition `h` is weaker than the
definition of `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`, since it only requires `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` to
agree with `f` on its source `e.source`, as opposed to on the whole space `X`. -/
theorem mk (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ Set.EqOn f e e.source) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨e, hx, he⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨{ e with
toFun := f
map_source' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.map_source' hx
left_inv' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.left_inv' hx
right_inv' := fun _y hy ↦ by rw [he (e.map_target' hy)]; exact e.right_inv' hy
continuousOn_toFun := (continuousOn_congr he).mpr e.continuousOn_toFun },
hx, rfl⟩
/-- A `PartialHomeomorph` is a local homeomorphism on its source. -/
lemma PartialHomeomorph.isLocalHomeomorphOn (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn e e.source :=
fun _ hx ↦ ⟨e, hx, rfl⟩
variable {g f s t}
theorem mono {t : Set X} (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s :=
fun x hx ↦ hf x (hst hx)
theorem of_comp_left (hgf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn (g ∘ f) s) (hg : IsLocalHomeomorphOn g (f '' s))
(cont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s := mk f s fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨g, hxg, rfl⟩ := hg (f x) ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨gf, hgf, he⟩ := hgf x hx
refine ⟨(gf.restr <| f ⁻¹' g.source).trans g.symm, ⟨⟨hgf, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mpr
((cont x hx).preimage_mem_nhds <| g.open_source.mem_nhds hxg)⟩, he ▸ g.map_source hxg⟩,
fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
change f y = g.symm (gf y)
have : f y ∈ g.source := by apply interior_subset hy.1.2
rw [← he, g.eq_symm_apply this (by apply g.map_source this), Function.comp_apply]
theorem of_comp_right (hgf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn (g ∘ f) s) (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn g (f '' s) := mk g _ <| by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨f, hxf, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
obtain ⟨gf, hgf, he⟩ := hgf x hx
refine ⟨f.symm.trans gf, ⟨f.map_source hxf, ?_⟩, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
· apply (f.left_inv hxf).symm ▸ hgf
· change g y = gf (f.symm y)
rw [← he, Function.comp_apply, f.right_inv hy.1]
theorem map_nhds_eq (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : (𝓝 x).map f = 𝓝 (f x) :=
let ⟨e, hx, he⟩ := hf x hx
he.symm ▸ e.map_nhds_eq hx
protected theorem continuousAt (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
(hf.map_nhds_eq hx).le
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun _x ↦ hf.continuousAt
protected theorem comp (hg : IsLocalHomeomorphOn g t) (hf : IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s)
(h : Set.MapsTo f s t) : IsLocalHomeomorphOn (g ∘ f) s := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨eg, hxg, rfl⟩ := hg (f x) (h hx)
obtain ⟨ef, hxf, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
exact ⟨ef.trans eg, ⟨hxf, hxg⟩, rfl⟩
end IsLocalHomeomorphOn
/-- A function `f : X → Y` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorph f` if each `x : x` is contained in
the source of some `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` with `f = e`. -/
def IsLocalHomeomorph :=
∀ x : X, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ f = e
theorem Homeomorph.isLocalHomeomorph (f : X ≃ₜ Y) : IsLocalHomeomorph f :=
fun _ ↦ ⟨f.toPartialHomeomorph, trivial, rfl⟩
variable {f s}
theorem isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ :
IsLocalHomeomorph f ↔ IsLocalHomeomorphOn f Set.univ :=
⟨fun h x _ ↦ h x, fun h x ↦ h x trivial⟩
protected theorem IsLocalHomeomorph.isLocalHomeomorphOn (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s := fun x _ ↦ hf x
theorem isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isOpenEmbedding_restrict {f : X → Y} :
IsLocalHomeomorph f ↔ ∀ x : X, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, IsOpenEmbedding (U.restrict f) := by
simp_rw [isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ,
isLocalHomeomorphOn_iff_isOpenEmbedding_restrict, imp_iff_right (Set.mem_univ _)]
theorem Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.isLocalHomeomorph (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsLocalHomeomorph f :=
isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isOpenEmbedding_restrict.mpr fun _ ↦
⟨_, Filter.univ_mem, hf.comp (Homeomorph.Set.univ X).isOpenEmbedding⟩
variable (f)
namespace IsLocalHomeomorph
/-- Proves that `f` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorph f`. The condition `h` is weaker than the
definition of `IsLocalHomeomorph f`, since it only requires `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` to
agree with `f` on its source `e.source`, as opposed to on the whole space `X`. -/
theorem mk (h : ∀ x : X, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ Set.EqOn f e e.source) :
IsLocalHomeomorph f :=
isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ.mpr
(IsLocalHomeomorphOn.mk f Set.univ fun x _hx ↦ h x)
/-- A homeomorphism is a local homeomorphism. -/
lemma Homeomorph.isLocalHomeomorph (h : X ≃ₜ Y) : IsLocalHomeomorph h :=
fun _ ↦ ⟨h.toPartialHomeomorph, trivial, rfl⟩
variable {g f}
lemma isLocallyInjective (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) : IsLocallyInjective f :=
fun x ↦ by obtain ⟨f, hx, rfl⟩ := hf x; exact ⟨f.source, f.open_source, hx, f.injOn⟩
theorem of_comp (hgf : IsLocalHomeomorph (g ∘ f)) (hg : IsLocalHomeomorph g)
(cont : Continuous f) : IsLocalHomeomorph f :=
isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ.mpr <|
hgf.isLocalHomeomorphOn.of_comp_left hg.isLocalHomeomorphOn fun _ _ ↦ cont.continuousAt
theorem map_nhds_eq (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) (x : X) : (𝓝 x).map f = 𝓝 (f x) :=
hf.isLocalHomeomorphOn.map_nhds_eq (Set.mem_univ x)
/-- A local homeomorphism is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.mpr hf.isLocalHomeomorphOn.continuousOn
/-- A local homeomorphism is an open map. -/
protected theorem isOpenMap (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) : IsOpenMap f :=
IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ge_of_eq (hf.map_nhds_eq x)
/-- The composition of local homeomorphisms is a local homeomorphism. -/
protected theorem comp (hg : IsLocalHomeomorph g) (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) :
IsLocalHomeomorph (g ∘ f) :=
isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ.mpr
(hg.isLocalHomeomorphOn.comp hf.isLocalHomeomorphOn (Set.univ.mapsTo_univ f))
/-- An injective local homeomorphism is an open embedding. -/
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_injective (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) (hi : f.Injective) :
IsOpenEmbedding f :=
.of_continuous_injective_isOpenMap hf.continuous hi hf.isOpenMap
/-- A bijective local homeomorphism is a homeomorphism. -/
noncomputable def toHomeomorph_of_bijective (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) (hb : f.Bijective) :
X ≃ₜ Y :=
(Equiv.ofBijective f hb).toHomeomorphOfContinuousOpen hf.continuous hf.isOpenMap
/-- Continuous local sections of a local homeomorphism are open embeddings. -/
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_comp (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph g) (hgf : IsOpenEmbedding (g ∘ f))
(cont : Continuous f) : IsOpenEmbedding f :=
(hgf.isLocalHomeomorph.of_comp hf cont).isOpenEmbedding_of_injective hgf.injective.of_comp
open TopologicalSpace in
/-- Ranges of continuous local sections of a local homeomorphism
form a basis of the source space. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis (hf : IsLocalHomeomorph f) : IsTopologicalBasis
{U : Set X | ∃ V : Set Y, IsOpen V ∧ ∃ s : C(V,X), f ∘ s = (↑) ∧ Set.range s = U} := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds ?_ fun x U hx hU ↦ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨U, hU, s, hs, rfl⟩
refine (isOpenEmbedding_of_comp hf (hs ▸ ⟨IsEmbedding.subtypeVal, ?_⟩)
s.continuous).isOpen_range
rwa [Subtype.range_val]
· obtain ⟨f, hxf, rfl⟩ := hf x
refine ⟨f.source ∩ U, ⟨f.target ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' U, f.symm.isOpen_inter_preimage hU,
⟨_, continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp (f.continuousOn_invFun.mono fun _ h ↦ h.1)⟩,
?_, (Set.range_restrict _ _).trans ?_⟩, ⟨hxf, hx⟩, fun _ h ↦ h.2⟩
· ext y; exact f.right_inv y.2.1
· apply (f.symm_image_target_inter_eq _).trans
rw [Set.preimage_inter, ← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
f.source_preimage_target, f.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage]
end IsLocalHomeomorph
| Mathlib/Topology/IsLocalHomeomorph.lean | 236 | 249 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series (in one variable)
This file defines (univariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
Formal power series in one variable are defined from multivariate
power series as `PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
The file sets up the (semi)ring structure on univariate power series.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
Additional results can be found in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc`, truncation of power series;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse`, about inverses of power series,
and the fact that power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order`, the order of a power series at 0,
and application to the fact that power series over an integral domain
form an integral domain.
## Implementation notes
Because of its definition,
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
a lot of proofs and properties from the multivariate case
can be ported to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `Unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they were indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Formal power series over a coefficient type `R` -/
abbrev PowerSeries (R : Type*) :=
MvPowerSeries Unit R
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
-- Porting note: not available in Lean 4
-- local reducible PowerSeries
/--
`R⟦X⟧` is notation for `PowerSeries R`,
the semiring of formal power series in one variable over a semiring `R`.
-/
scoped notation:9000 R "⟦X⟧" => PowerSeries R
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Zero R] : Zero R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Semiring R] : Semiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Ring R] : Ring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S A⟦X⟧ :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance {A} [Semiring A] [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
end
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : R⟦X⟧ →ₗ[R] R :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series. -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.monomial R (single () n)
variable {R}
theorem coeff_def {s : Unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) : coeff R n = MvPowerSeries.coeff R s := by
rw [coeff, ← h, ← Finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
rw [← coeff_def]
· apply h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_coeff_eq_zero (φ : R⟦X⟧) : (∀ n, coeff R n φ = 0) ↔ φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext h, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc PowerSeries.ext_iff
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
subsingleton
/-- Constructor for formal power series. -/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : R⟦X⟧ := fun s => f (s ())
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ := MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial _ _ _
_ = if m = n then a else 0 := by simp only [Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
theorem monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial R n a = mk fun m => if m = n then a else 0 :=
ext fun m => by rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : R⟦X⟧ →+* R :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff Unit R
/-- The constant formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.C Unit R
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_eq {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] : algebraMap R R⟦X⟧ = C R := rfl
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring. -/
def X : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.X ()
theorem commute_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : Commute φ X :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X _ _
theorem X_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = φ * X :=
MvPowerSeries.X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X ^ n) :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X_pow _ _ _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * φ = φ * X ^ n :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R 0) = constantCoeff R := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero]
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 φ = constantCoeff R φ := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `rw; rfl` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [monomial, Finsupp.single_zero, MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C]
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a := by simp
theorem coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then a else 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a := by
rw [coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : coeff R n (C R a) = 0 := by
rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff R (n + 1) (C R a) = 0 :=
coeff_ne_zero_C n.succ_ne_zero
theorem C_injective : Function.Injective (C R) := by
intro a b H
simp_rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at H
simpa only [coeff_zero_C] using H 0
protected theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ ↔ Subsingleton R := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
rw [subsingleton_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun a b ↦ C_injective (h (C R a) (C R b))
theorem X_eq : (X : R⟦X⟧) = monomial R 1 1 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_X (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (X : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X : coeff R 0 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero, X, MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_X : coeff R 1 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 1 := by rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : (X : R⟦X⟧) ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simpa only [coeff_one_X, one_ne_zero, map_zero] using congr_arg (coeff R 1) H
theorem X_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n = monomial R n 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_eq _ n
theorem coeff_X_pow (m n : ℕ) : coeff R m ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = if m = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff R n ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = 1 := by
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (1 : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C n 1
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R 0 (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_mul (n : ℕ) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
-- `rw` can't see that `PowerSeries = MvPowerSeries Unit`, so use `.trans`
refine (MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul _ φ ψ).trans ?_
rw [Finsupp.antidiagonal_single, Finset.sum_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (φ * C R a) = coeff R n φ * a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_C _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_C_mul _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (n : ℕ) (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
coeff S n (a • φ) = a • coeff S n φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
constantCoeff S (a • φ) = a • constantCoeff S φ :=
rfl
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (f : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : a • f = C R a * f := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_mul_X (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (φ * X) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add]
convert φ.coeff_add_mul_monomial (single () n) (single () 1) _
rw [mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_X_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (X * φ) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add, add_comm n 1]
convert φ.coeff_add_monomial_mul (single () 1) (single () n) _
rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_X_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X = ψ * X) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem mul_X_injective : Function.Injective (· * X : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_cancel
theorem mul_X_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : φ * X = ψ * X ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_injective.eq_iff
theorem X_mul_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X * φ = X * ψ) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem X_mul_injective : Function.Injective (X * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_mul_cancel
theorem X_mul_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = X * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
X_mul_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (a : R) : constantCoeff R (C R a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : (constantCoeff R).comp (C R) = RingHom.id R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_zero : constantCoeff R 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_one : constantCoeff R 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X : constantCoeff R X = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_mk {f : ℕ → R} : constantCoeff R (mk f) = f 0 := rfl
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (φ * X) = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (X * φ) = 0 := by simp
theorem constantCoeff_surj : Function.Surjective (constantCoeff R) :=
fun r => ⟨(C R) r, constantCoeff_C r⟩
-- The following section duplicates the API of `Data.Polynomial.Coeff` and should attempt to keep
-- up to date with that
section
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (C R x * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧) = if n = k then x else 0 := by
simp [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (p * X ^ n) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (d, n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (X ^ n * p) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (n, d), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, one_mul]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_comm, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· rw [add_comm]
exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
theorem mul_X_pow_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem mul_X_pow_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (· * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_pow_cancel
theorem mul_X_pow_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_pow_injective.eq_iff
theorem X_pow_mul_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem X_pow_mul_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (X ^ k * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_pow_mul_cancel
theorem X_pow_mul_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
X_pow_mul_injective.eq_iff
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow' (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R d (p * X ^ n) = ite (n ≤ d) (coeff R (d - n) p) 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_mul_X_pow, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_)
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
exact ((le_of_add_le_right (mem_antidiagonal.mp hx).le).trans_lt <| not_le.mp h).ne
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul' (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R d (X ^ n * p) = ite (n ≤ d) (coeff R (d - n) p) 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_X_pow_mul]
simp
· refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_)
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
have := mem_antidiagonal.mp hx
rw [add_comm] at this
exact ((le_of_add_le_right this.le).trans_lt <| not_le.mp h).ne
end
/-- If a formal power series is invertible, then so is its constant coefficient. -/
theorem isUnit_constantCoeff (φ : R⟦X⟧) (h : IsUnit φ) : IsUnit (constantCoeff R φ) :=
MvPowerSeries.isUnit_constantCoeff φ h
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
theorem eq_shift_mul_X_add_const (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ = (mk fun p => coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X + C R (constantCoeff R φ) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp only [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, map_add, map_mul, constantCoeff_X,
mul_zero, coeff_zero_C, zero_add]
· simp only [coeff_succ_mul_X, coeff_mk, LinearMap.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero]
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
theorem eq_X_mul_shift_add_const (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ = (X * mk fun p => coeff R (p + 1) φ) + C R (constantCoeff R φ) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp only [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, map_add, map_mul, constantCoeff_X,
zero_mul, coeff_zero_C, zero_add]
· simp only [coeff_succ_X_mul, coeff_mk, LinearMap.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero]
section Map
variable {S : Type*} {T : Type*} [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
/-- The map between formal power series induced by a map on the coefficients. -/
def map : R⟦X⟧ →+* S⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.map _ f
@[simp]
theorem map_id : (map (RingHom.id R) : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) = id :=
rfl
theorem map_comp : map (g.comp f) = (map g).comp (map f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_map (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff S n (map f φ) = f (coeff R n φ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_C (r : R) : map f (C _ r) = C _ (f r) := by
ext
simp [coeff_C, apply_ite f]
@[simp]
theorem map_X : map f X = X := by
ext
simp [coeff_X, apply_ite f]
theorem map_surjective (f : S →+* T) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (PowerSeries.map f) := by
intro g
use PowerSeries.mk fun k ↦ Function.surjInv hf (PowerSeries.coeff _ k g)
ext k
simp only [Function.surjInv, coeff_map, coeff_mk]
exact Classical.choose_spec (hf ((coeff T k) g))
theorem map_injective (f : S →+* T) (hf : Function.Injective ⇑f) :
Function.Injective (PowerSeries.map f) := by
intro u v huv
ext k
apply hf
rw [← PowerSeries.coeff_map, ← PowerSeries.coeff_map, huv]
end Map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {R S : Type*} [DivisionSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (φ : R⟦X⟧)
(f : R →+* S) : φ.map f = 0 ↔ φ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.map_eq_zero _ _
theorem X_pow_dvd_iff {n : ℕ} {φ : R⟦X⟧} :
(X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m, m < n → coeff R m φ = 0 := by
convert@MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff Unit R _ () n φ
constructor <;> intro h m hm
· rw [Finsupp.unique_single m]
convert h _ hm
· apply h
simpa only [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using hm
theorem X_dvd_iff {φ : R⟦X⟧} : (X : R⟦X⟧) ∣ φ ↔ constantCoeff R φ = 0 := by
rw [← pow_one (X : R⟦X⟧), X_pow_dvd_iff, ← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h 0 zero_lt_one
· intro m hm
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hm)]
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The ring homomorphism taking a power series `f(X)` to `f(aX)`. -/
noncomputable def rescale (a : R) : R⟦X⟧ →+* R⟦X⟧ where
toFun f := PowerSeries.mk fun n => a ^ n * PowerSeries.coeff R n f
map_zero' := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, PowerSeries.coeff_mk, mul_zero]
map_one' := by
ext1
simp only [mul_boole, PowerSeries.coeff_mk, PowerSeries.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero a]
rfl
map_add' := by
intros
ext
dsimp only
exact mul_add _ _ _
map_mul' f g := by
ext
rw [PowerSeries.coeff_mul, PowerSeries.coeff_mk, PowerSeries.coeff_mul, Finset.mul_sum]
apply sum_congr rfl
simp only [coeff_mk, Prod.forall, mem_antidiagonal]
intro b c H
rw [← H, pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_rescale (f : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (rescale a f) = a ^ n * coeff R n f :=
coeff_mk n (fun n ↦ a ^ n * (coeff R n) f)
@[simp]
theorem rescale_zero : rescale 0 = (C R).comp (constantCoeff R) := by
ext x n
simp only [Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, rescale, RingHom.coe_mk,
PowerSeries.coeff_mk _ _, coeff_C]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem rescale_zero_apply (f : R⟦X⟧) : rescale 0 f = C R (constantCoeff R f) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rescale_one : rescale 1 = RingHom.id R⟦X⟧ := by
ext
simp [coeff_rescale]
theorem rescale_mk (f : ℕ → R) (a : R) : rescale a (mk f) = mk fun n : ℕ => a ^ n * f n := by
ext
rw [coeff_rescale, coeff_mk, coeff_mk]
theorem rescale_rescale (f : R⟦X⟧) (a b : R) :
rescale b (rescale a f) = rescale (a * b) f := by
ext n
simp_rw [coeff_rescale]
rw [mul_pow, mul_comm _ (b ^ n), mul_assoc]
theorem rescale_mul (a b : R) : rescale (a * b) = (rescale b).comp (rescale a) := by
ext
simp [← rescale_rescale]
end CommSemiring
section CommSemiring
open Finset.HasAntidiagonal Finset
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Coefficients of a product of power series -/
theorem coeff_prod (f : ι → PowerSeries R) (d : ℕ) (s : Finset ι) :
coeff R d (∏ j ∈ s, f j) = ∑ l ∈ finsuppAntidiag s d, ∏ i ∈ s, coeff R (l i) (f i) := by
simp only [coeff]
rw [MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod, ← AddEquiv.finsuppUnique_symm d, ← mapRange_finsuppAntidiag_eq,
sum_map, sum_congr rfl]
intro x _
apply prod_congr rfl
intro i _
congr 2
simp only [AddEquiv.toEquiv_eq_coe, Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv, AddEquiv.toEquiv_symm,
Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, Finsupp.mapRange.equiv_apply, AddEquiv.coe_toEquiv_symm,
Finsupp.mapRange_apply, AddEquiv.finsuppUnique_symm]
/-- The `n`-th coefficient of the `k`-th power of a power series. -/
lemma coeff_pow (k n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (φ ^ k) = ∑ l ∈ finsuppAntidiag (range k) n, ∏ i ∈ range k, coeff R (l i) φ := by
have h₁ (i : ℕ) : Function.const ℕ φ i = φ := rfl
have h₂ (i : ℕ) : ∏ j ∈ range i, Function.const ℕ φ j = φ ^ i := by
apply prod_range_induction (fun _ => φ) (fun i => φ ^ i) rfl (congrFun rfl) i
rw [← h₂, ← h₁ k]
apply coeff_prod (f := Function.const ℕ φ) (d := n) (s := range k)
/-- First coefficient of the product of two power series. -/
lemma coeff_one_mul (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 1 (φ * ψ) =
coeff R 1 φ * constantCoeff R ψ + coeff R 1 ψ * constantCoeff R φ := by
have : Finset.antidiagonal 1 = {(0, 1), (1, 0)} := by exact rfl
rw [coeff_mul, this, Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff,
mul_comm, add_comm]
norm_num
/-- First coefficient of the `n`-th power of a power series. -/
lemma coeff_one_pow (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R 1 (φ ^ n) = n * coeff R 1 φ * (constantCoeff R φ) ^ (n - 1) := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hn)
· simp
induction n with
| zero => omega
| succ n' ih =>
have h₁ (m : ℕ) : φ ^ (m + 1) = φ ^ m * φ := by exact rfl
have h₂ : Finset.antidiagonal 1 = {(0, 1), (1, 0)} := by exact rfl
rw [h₁, coeff_mul, h₂, Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_singleton]
· simp only [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, map_pow, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
have h₀ : n' = 0 ∨ 1 ≤ n' := by omega
rcases h₀ with h' | h'
· by_contra h''
rw [h'] at h''
simp only [pow_zero, one_mul, coeff_one, one_ne_zero, ↓reduceIte, zero_mul, add_zero,
CharP.cast_eq_zero, zero_add, mul_one, not_true_eq_false] at h''
norm_num at h''
· rw [ih]
· conv => lhs; arg 2; rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
move_mul [← (constantCoeff R) φ ^ (n' - 1)]
conv => enter [1, 2, 1, 1, 2]; rw [← pow_one (a := constantCoeff R φ)]
rw [← pow_add (a := constantCoeff R φ)]
conv => enter [1, 2, 1, 1]; rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h']
conv => enter [1, 2, 1]; rw [mul_comm]
rw [mul_assoc, ← one_add_mul, add_comm, mul_assoc]
conv => enter [1, 2]; rw [mul_comm]
exact h'
· decide
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A]
theorem not_isField : ¬IsField A⟦X⟧ := by
by_cases hA : Subsingleton A
· exact not_isField_of_subsingleton _
· nontriviality A
rw [Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top]
use Ideal.span {X}
constructor
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact X_ne_zero
· rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, Ideal.mem_span_singleton,
X_dvd_iff, constantCoeff_one]
exact one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem rescale_X (a : A) : rescale a X = C A a * X := by
ext
simp only [coeff_rescale, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem rescale_neg_one_X : rescale (-1 : A) X = -X := by
| rw [rescale_X, map_neg, map_one, neg_one_mul]
/-- The ring homomorphism taking a power series `f(X)` to `f(-X)`. -/
noncomputable def evalNegHom : A⟦X⟧ →+* A⟦X⟧ :=
rescale (-1 : A)
@[simp]
theorem evalNegHom_X : evalNegHom (X : A⟦X⟧) = -X :=
rescale_neg_one_X
end CommRing
section Algebra
variable {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
theorem C_eq_algebraMap {r : R} : C R r = (algebraMap R R⟦X⟧) r :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_apply {r : R} : algebraMap R A⟦X⟧ r = C A (algebraMap R A r) :=
MvPowerSeries.algebraMap_apply
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (Subalgebra R R⟦X⟧) :=
{ inferInstanceAs <| Nontrivial <| Subalgebra R <| MvPowerSeries Unit R with }
/-- Change of coefficients in power series, as an `AlgHom` -/
def mapAlgHom (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
PowerSeries A →ₐ[R] PowerSeries B :=
MvPowerSeries.mapAlgHom φ
theorem mapAlgHom_apply (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) (f : A⟦X⟧) :
mapAlgHom φ f = f.map φ :=
MvPowerSeries.mapAlgHom_apply φ f
end Algebra
end PowerSeries
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Basic.lean | 725 | 762 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Basic
/-!
# Order continuity
We say that a function is *left order continuous* if it sends all least upper bounds
to least upper bounds. The order dual notion is called *right order continuity*.
For monotone functions `ℝ → ℝ` these notions correspond to the usual left and right continuity.
We prove some basic lemmas (`map_sup`, `map_sSup` etc) and prove that a `RelIso` is both left
and right order continuous.
-/
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
open Function OrderDual Set
/-!
### Definitions
-/
/-- A function `f` between preorders is left order continuous if it preserves all suprema. We
define it using `IsLUB` instead of `sSup` so that the proof works both for complete lattices and
conditionally complete lattices. -/
def LeftOrdContinuous [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃x⦄, IsLUB s x → IsLUB (f '' s) (f x)
/-- A function `f` between preorders is right order continuous if it preserves all infima. We
define it using `IsGLB` instead of `sInf` so that the proof works both for complete lattices and
conditionally complete lattices. -/
def RightOrdContinuous [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃x⦄, IsGLB s x → IsGLB (f '' s) (f x)
namespace LeftOrdContinuous
section Preorder
variable (α) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
protected theorem id : LeftOrdContinuous (id : α → α) := fun s x h => by
simpa only [image_id] using h
variable {α}
protected theorem rightOrdContinuous_dual :
LeftOrdContinuous f → RightOrdContinuous (toDual ∘ f ∘ ofDual) :=
id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")]
protected alias order_dual := LeftOrdContinuous.rightOrdContinuous_dual
theorem map_isGreatest (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : IsGreatest s x) :
IsGreatest (f '' s) (f x) :=
⟨mem_image_of_mem f h.1, (hf h.isLUB).1⟩
theorem mono (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) : Monotone f := fun a₁ a₂ h =>
have : IsGreatest {a₁, a₂} a₂ := ⟨Or.inr rfl, by simp [*]⟩
(hf.map_isGreatest this).2 <| mem_image_of_mem _ (Or.inl rfl)
theorem comp (hg : LeftOrdContinuous g) (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) : LeftOrdContinuous (g ∘ f) :=
fun s x h => by simpa only [image_image] using hg (hf h)
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (n : ℕ) :
LeftOrdContinuous f^[n] :=
match n with
| 0 => LeftOrdContinuous.id α
| (n + 1) => (LeftOrdContinuous.iterate hf n).comp hf
end Preorder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : α → β}
theorem map_sup (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (x y : α) : f (x ⊔ y) = f x ⊔ f y :=
(hf isLUB_pair).unique <| by simp only [image_pair, isLUB_pair]
theorem le_iff (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (h : Injective f) {x y} : f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp only [← sup_eq_right, ← hf.map_sup, h.eq_iff]
theorem lt_iff (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (h : Injective f) {x y} : f x < f y ↔ x < y := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, hf.le_iff h]
variable (f)
/-- Convert an injective left order continuous function to an order embedding. -/
def toOrderEmbedding (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (h : Injective f) : α ↪o β :=
⟨⟨f, h⟩, hf.le_iff h⟩
variable {f}
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/OrdContinuous.lean | 102 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Portmanteau
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
/-!
# The Lévy-Prokhorov distance on spaces of finite measures and probability measures
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.levyProkhorovEDist`: The Lévy-Prokhorov edistance between two measures.
* `MeasureTheory.levyProkhorovDist`: The Lévy-Prokhorov distance between two finite measures.
## Main results
* `levyProkhorovDist_pseudoMetricSpace_finiteMeasure`: The Lévy-Prokhorov distance is a
pseudoemetric on the space of finite measures.
* `levyProkhorovDist_pseudoMetricSpace_probabilityMeasure`: The Lévy-Prokhorov distance is a
pseudoemetric on the space of probability measures.
* `levyProkhorov_le_convergenceInDistribution`: The topology of the Lévy-Prokhorov metric on
probability measures is always at least as fine as the topology of convergence in distribution.
* `levyProkhorov_eq_convergenceInDistribution`: The topology of the Lévy-Prokhorov metric on
probability measures on a separable space coincides with the topology of convergence in
distribution, and in particular convergence in distribution is then pseudometrizable.
## Tags
finite measure, probability measure, weak convergence, convergence in distribution, metrizability
-/
open Topology Metric Filter Set ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
section Levy_Prokhorov
/-! ### Lévy-Prokhorov metric -/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω]
/-- The Lévy-Prokhorov edistance between measures:
`d(μ,ν) = inf {r ≥ 0 | ∀ B, μ B ≤ ν Bᵣ + r ∧ ν B ≤ μ Bᵣ + r}`. -/
noncomputable def levyProkhorovEDist (μ ν : Measure Ω) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
sInf {ε | ∀ B, MeasurableSet B →
μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε.toReal B) + ε ∧ ν B ≤ μ (thickening ε.toReal B) + ε}
/- This result is not placed in earlier more generic files, since it is rather specialized;
it mixes measure and metric in a very particular way. -/
lemma meas_le_of_le_of_forall_le_meas_thickening_add {ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} (μ ν : Measure Ω)
(h_le : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) {B : Set Ω} (hε₁ : μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε₁.toReal B) + ε₁) :
μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε₂.toReal B) + ε₂ := by
by_cases ε_top : ε₂ = ∞
· simp only [ne_eq, FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, ε_top, toReal_top,
add_top, le_top]
apply hε₁.trans (add_le_add ?_ h_le)
exact measure_mono (μ := ν) (thickening_mono (toReal_mono ε_top h_le) B)
lemma left_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt {μ ν : Measure Ω} {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < c) {B : Set Ω} (B_mble : MeasurableSet B) :
μ B ≤ ν (thickening c.toReal B) + c := by
obtain ⟨c', ⟨hc', lt_c⟩⟩ := sInf_lt_iff.mp h
exact meas_le_of_le_of_forall_le_meas_thickening_add μ ν lt_c.le (hc' B B_mble).1
lemma right_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt {μ ν : Measure Ω} {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < c) {B : Set Ω} (B_mble : MeasurableSet B) :
ν B ≤ μ (thickening c.toReal B) + c := by
obtain ⟨c', ⟨hc', lt_c⟩⟩ := sInf_lt_iff.mp h
exact meas_le_of_le_of_forall_le_meas_thickening_add ν μ lt_c.le (hc' B B_mble).2
/-- A general sufficient condition for bounding `levyProkhorovEDist` from above. -/
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall_add_pos_le (μ ν : Measure Ω) (δ : ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ ε B, 0 < ε → ε < ∞ → MeasurableSet B →
μ B ≤ ν (thickening (δ + ε).toReal B) + δ + ε ∧
ν B ≤ μ (thickening (δ + ε).toReal B) + δ + ε) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν ≤ δ := by
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε hε _
by_cases ε_top : ε = ∞
· simp only [ε_top, add_top, le_top]
apply sInf_le
intro B B_mble
simpa only [add_assoc] using h ε B (coe_pos.mpr hε) coe_lt_top B_mble
/-- A simple general sufficient condition for bounding `levyProkhorovEDist` from above. -/
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall (μ ν : Measure Ω) (δ : ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ ε B, δ < ε → ε < ∞ → MeasurableSet B →
μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε.toReal B) + ε ∧ ν B ≤ μ (thickening ε.toReal B) + ε) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν ≤ δ := by
by_cases δ_top : δ = ∞
· simp only [δ_top, add_top, le_top]
apply levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall_add_pos_le
intro x B x_pos x_lt_top B_mble
simpa only [← add_assoc] using h (δ + x) B (ENNReal.lt_add_right δ_top x_pos.ne.symm)
(by simp only [add_lt_top, Ne.lt_top δ_top, x_lt_top, and_self]) B_mble
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_le_max_measure_univ (μ ν : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν ≤ max (μ univ) (ν univ) := by
refine sInf_le fun B _ ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> apply le_add_left <;> simp [measure_mono]
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_lt_top (μ ν : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < ∞ :=
(levyProkhorovEDist_le_max_measure_univ μ ν).trans_lt <| by simp [measure_lt_top]
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_ne_top (μ ν : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν ≠ ∞ := (levyProkhorovEDist_lt_top μ ν).ne
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_self (μ : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ μ = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← csInf_Ioo zero_lt_top]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun ε ⟨hε₀, hε_top⟩ B _ ↦ and_self_iff.2 ?_
refine le_add_right <| measure_mono <| self_subset_thickening ?_ _
exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hε₀.ne' hε_top.ne
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_comm (μ ν : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν = levyProkhorovEDist ν μ := by
simp only [levyProkhorovEDist, and_comm]
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_triangle [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] (μ ν κ : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ κ ≤ levyProkhorovEDist μ ν + levyProkhorovEDist ν κ := by
by_cases LPμν_finite : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν = ∞
· simp [LPμν_finite]
by_cases LPνκ_finite : levyProkhorovEDist ν κ = ∞
· simp [LPνκ_finite]
apply levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall_add_pos_le
intro ε B ε_pos ε_lt_top B_mble
have half_ε_pos : 0 < ε / 2 := ENNReal.div_pos ε_pos.ne' ofNat_ne_top
have half_ε_lt_top : ε / 2 < ∞ := ENNReal.div_lt_top ε_lt_top.ne two_ne_zero
let r := levyProkhorovEDist μ ν + ε / 2
let s := levyProkhorovEDist ν κ + ε / 2
have lt_r : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < r := lt_add_right LPμν_finite half_ε_pos.ne'
have lt_s : levyProkhorovEDist ν κ < s := lt_add_right LPνκ_finite half_ε_pos.ne'
have hs_add_r : s + r = levyProkhorovEDist μ ν + levyProkhorovEDist ν κ + ε := by
simp_rw [s, r, add_assoc, add_comm (ε / 2), add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, ← add_assoc,
add_comm (levyProkhorovEDist μ ν)]
have hs_add_r' : s.toReal + r.toReal
= (levyProkhorovEDist μ ν + levyProkhorovEDist ν κ + ε).toReal := by
rw [← hs_add_r, ← ENNReal.toReal_add]
· exact ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨LPνκ_finite, half_ε_lt_top.ne⟩
· exact ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨LPμν_finite, half_ε_lt_top.ne⟩
rw [← hs_add_r', add_assoc, ← hs_add_r, add_assoc _ _ ε, ← hs_add_r]
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· calc μ B ≤ ν (thickening r.toReal B) + r :=
left_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt lt_r B_mble
_ ≤ κ (thickening s.toReal (thickening r.toReal B)) + s + r :=
add_le_add_right
(left_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt lt_s isOpen_thickening.measurableSet) _
_ = κ (thickening s.toReal (thickening r.toReal B)) + (s + r) := add_assoc _ _ _
_ ≤ κ (thickening (s.toReal + r.toReal) B) + (s + r) :=
add_le_add_right (measure_mono (thickening_thickening_subset _ _ _)) _
· calc κ B ≤ ν (thickening s.toReal B) + s :=
right_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt lt_s B_mble
_ ≤ μ (thickening r.toReal (thickening s.toReal B)) + r + s :=
add_le_add_right
(right_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt lt_r isOpen_thickening.measurableSet) s
_ = μ (thickening r.toReal (thickening s.toReal B)) + (s + r) := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm r]
_ ≤ μ (thickening (r.toReal + s.toReal) B) + (s + r) :=
add_le_add_right (measure_mono (thickening_thickening_subset _ _ _)) _
_ = μ (thickening (s.toReal + r.toReal) B) + (s + r) := by rw [add_comm r.toReal]
/-- The Lévy-Prokhorov distance between finite measures:
`d(μ,ν) = inf {r ≥ 0 | ∀ B, μ B ≤ ν Bᵣ + r ∧ ν B ≤ μ Bᵣ + r}`. -/
noncomputable def levyProkhorovDist (μ ν : Measure Ω) : ℝ :=
(levyProkhorovEDist μ ν).toReal
lemma levyProkhorovDist_self (μ : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovDist μ μ = 0 := by
simp only [levyProkhorovDist, levyProkhorovEDist_self, toReal_zero]
lemma levyProkhorovDist_comm (μ ν : Measure Ω) :
levyProkhorovDist μ ν = levyProkhorovDist ν μ := by
simp only [levyProkhorovDist, levyProkhorovEDist_comm]
lemma levyProkhorovDist_triangle [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] (μ ν κ : Measure Ω)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] [IsFiniteMeasure κ] :
levyProkhorovDist μ κ ≤ levyProkhorovDist μ ν + levyProkhorovDist ν κ := by
have dμν_finite := (levyProkhorovEDist_lt_top μ ν).ne
have dνκ_finite := (levyProkhorovEDist_lt_top ν κ).ne
convert ENNReal.toReal_mono ?_ <| levyProkhorovEDist_triangle μ ν κ
· simp only [levyProkhorovDist, ENNReal.toReal_add dμν_finite dνκ_finite]
· exact ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨dμν_finite, dνκ_finite⟩
/-- A type synonym, to be used for `Measure α`, `FiniteMeasure α`, or `ProbabilityMeasure α`,
when they are to be equipped with the Lévy-Prokhorov distance. -/
def LevyProkhorov (α : Type*) := α
/-- The "identity" equivalence between the type synonym `LevyProkhorov α` and `α`. -/
def LevyProkhorov.equiv (α : Type*) : LevyProkhorov α ≃ α := Equiv.refl _
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- The Lévy-Prokhorov distance `levyProkhorovEDist` makes `Measure Ω` a pseudoemetric
space. The instance is recorded on the type synonym `LevyProkhorov (Measure Ω) := Measure Ω`. -/
noncomputable instance : PseudoEMetricSpace (LevyProkhorov (Measure Ω)) where
edist := levyProkhorovEDist
edist_self := levyProkhorovEDist_self
edist_comm := levyProkhorovEDist_comm
edist_triangle := levyProkhorovEDist_triangle
/-- The Lévy-Prokhorov distance `levyProkhorovDist` makes `FiniteMeasure Ω` a pseudometric
space. The instance is recorded on the type synonym
`LevyProkhorov (FiniteMeasure Ω) := FiniteMeasure Ω`. -/
noncomputable instance levyProkhorovDist_pseudoMetricSpace_finiteMeasure :
PseudoMetricSpace (LevyProkhorov (FiniteMeasure Ω)) where
dist μ ν := levyProkhorovDist μ.toMeasure ν.toMeasure
dist_self _ := levyProkhorovDist_self _
dist_comm _ _ := levyProkhorovDist_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := levyProkhorovDist_triangle _ _ _
edist_dist μ ν := by simp [← ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
lemma measure_le_measure_closure_of_levyProkhorovEDist_eq_zero {μ ν : Measure Ω}
(hLP : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν = 0) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s)
(h_finite : ∃ δ > 0, ν (thickening δ s) ≠ ∞) :
μ s ≤ ν (closure s) := by
have key : Tendsto (fun ε ↦ ν (thickening ε.toReal s)) (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝 (ν (closure s))) := by
have aux : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within (s := Ioi 0) ENNReal.toReal
· exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (continuousAt_toReal zero_ne_top).tendsto
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT zero_lt_one] with x hx
exact toReal_pos hx.1.ne.symm <| ne_top_of_lt hx.2
exact (tendsto_measure_thickening h_finite).comp aux
have obs := Tendsto.add key (tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id)
simp only [id_eq, add_zero] at obs
apply ge_of_tendsto (b := μ s) obs
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with ε ε_pos
exact left_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt (B_mble := s_mble) (hLP ▸ ε_pos)
/-- Two measures at vanishing Lévy-Prokhorov distance from each other assign the same values to all
closed sets. -/
lemma measure_eq_measure_of_levyProkhorovEDist_eq_zero_of_isClosed {μ ν : Measure Ω}
(hLP : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν = 0) {s : Set Ω} (s_closed : IsClosed s)
(hμs : ∃ δ > 0, μ (thickening δ s) ≠ ∞) (hνs : ∃ δ > 0, ν (thickening δ s) ≠ ∞) :
μ s = ν s := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact measure_le_measure_closure_of_levyProkhorovEDist_eq_zero
hLP s_closed.measurableSet hνs |>.trans <|
le_of_eq (congr_arg _ s_closed.closure_eq)
· exact measure_le_measure_closure_of_levyProkhorovEDist_eq_zero
(levyProkhorovEDist_comm μ ν ▸ hLP) s_closed.measurableSet hμs |>.trans <|
le_of_eq (congr_arg _ s_closed.closure_eq)
/-- The Lévy-Prokhorov distance `levyProkhorovDist` makes `ProbabilityMeasure Ω` a pseudometric
space. The instance is recorded on the type synonym
`LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) := ProbabilityMeasure Ω`.
Note: For this pseudometric to give the topology of convergence in distribution, one must
furthermore assume that `Ω` is separable. -/
noncomputable instance levyProkhorovDist_pseudoMetricSpace_probabilityMeasure :
PseudoMetricSpace (LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω)) where
dist μ ν := levyProkhorovDist μ.toMeasure ν.toMeasure
dist_self _ := levyProkhorovDist_self _
dist_comm _ _ := levyProkhorovDist_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := levyProkhorovDist_triangle _ _ _
edist_dist μ ν := by simp [← ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
lemma LevyProkhorov.dist_def (μ ν : LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω)) :
dist μ ν = levyProkhorovDist μ.toMeasure ν.toMeasure := rfl
/-- If `Ω` is a Borel space, then the Lévy-Prokhorov distance `levyProkhorovDist` makes
`ProbabilityMeasure Ω` a metric space. The instance is recorded on the type synonym
`LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) := ProbabilityMeasure Ω`.
Note: For this metric to give the topology of convergence in distribution, one must
furthermore assume that `Ω` is separable. -/
noncomputable instance levyProkhorovDist_metricSpace_probabilityMeasure [BorelSpace Ω] :
MetricSpace (LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω)) where
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by
intro μ ν h
apply (LevyProkhorov.equiv _).injective
apply ProbabilityMeasure.toMeasure_injective
apply ext_of_generate_finite _ ?_ isPiSystem_isClosed ?_ (by simp)
· rw [BorelSpace.measurable_eq (α := Ω), borel_eq_generateFrom_isClosed]
· intro A A_closed
apply measure_eq_measure_of_levyProkhorovEDist_eq_zero_of_isClosed
· simpa only [levyProkhorovEDist_ne_top μ.toMeasure ν.toMeasure, mem_setOf_eq,
or_false, ne_eq, zero_ne_top, not_false_eq_true, toReal_zero]
using (toReal_eq_zero_iff _).mp h
· exact A_closed
· exact ⟨1, Real.zero_lt_one, measure_ne_top _ _⟩
· exact ⟨1, Real.zero_lt_one, measure_ne_top _ _⟩
/-- A simple sufficient condition for bounding `levyProkhorovEDist` between probability measures
from above. The condition involves only one of two natural bounds, the other bound is for free. -/
lemma levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall_le
(μ ν : Measure Ω) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [IsProbabilityMeasure ν] (δ : ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ ε B, δ < ε → ε < ∞ → MeasurableSet B → μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε.toReal B) + ε) :
levyProkhorovEDist μ ν ≤ δ := by
apply levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall μ ν δ
intro ε B ε_gt ε_lt_top B_mble
refine ⟨h ε B ε_gt ε_lt_top B_mble, ?_⟩
have B_subset := subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self ε.toReal B
apply (measure_mono (μ := ν) B_subset).trans
rw [prob_compl_eq_one_sub isOpen_thickening.measurableSet]
have Tc_mble := (isOpen_thickening (δ := ε.toReal) (E := B)).isClosed_compl.measurableSet
specialize h ε (thickening ε.toReal B)ᶜ ε_gt ε_lt_top Tc_mble
rw [prob_compl_eq_one_sub isOpen_thickening.measurableSet] at h
have almost := add_le_add (c := μ (thickening ε.toReal B)) h rfl.le
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le prob_le_one, add_assoc] at almost
apply (tsub_le_tsub_right almost _).trans
rw [ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left (measure_ne_top ν _), add_comm ε]
/-- A simple sufficient condition for bounding `levyProkhorovDist` between probability measures
from above. The condition involves only one of two natural bounds, the other bound is for free. -/
lemma levyProkhorovDist_le_of_forall_le
(μ ν : Measure Ω) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [IsProbabilityMeasure ν] {δ : ℝ} (δ_nn : 0 ≤ δ)
(h : ∀ ε B, δ < ε → MeasurableSet B → μ B ≤ ν (thickening ε B) + ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
levyProkhorovDist μ ν ≤ δ := by
apply toReal_le_of_le_ofReal δ_nn
apply levyProkhorovEDist_le_of_forall_le
intro ε B ε_gt ε_lt_top B_mble
have ε_gt' : δ < ε.toReal := by
refine (ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ?_).mp ?_
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos (ne_zero_of_lt ε_gt) ε_lt_top.ne
· simpa [ofReal_toReal_eq_iff.mpr ε_lt_top.ne] using ε_gt
convert h ε.toReal B ε_gt' B_mble
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_toReal ε_lt_top.ne).symm
end Levy_Prokhorov --section
section Levy_Prokhorov_is_finer
/-! ### The Lévy-Prokhorov topology is at least as fine as convergence in distribution -/
open BoundedContinuousFunction
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
variable [PseudoMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- A version of the layer cake formula for bounded continuous functions which have finite integral:
∫ f dμ = ∫ t in (0, ‖f‖], μ {x | f(x) ≥ t} dt. -/
lemma BoundedContinuousFunction.integral_eq_integral_meas_le_of_hasFiniteIntegral
{α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
(f : α →ᵇ ℝ) (μ : Measure α) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
∫ ω, f ω ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioc 0 ‖f‖, μ.real {a : α | t ≤ f a} := by
rw [Integrable.integral_eq_integral_Ioc_meas_le (M := ‖f‖) ?_ f_nn ?_]
· exact ⟨f.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩
· exact Eventually.of_forall (fun x ↦ BoundedContinuousFunction.apply_le_norm f x)
/-- A version of the layer cake formula for bounded continuous functions and finite measures:
∫ f dμ = ∫ t in (0, ‖f‖], μ {x | f(x) ≥ t} dt. -/
lemma BoundedContinuousFunction.integral_eq_integral_meas_le
{α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
(f : α →ᵇ ℝ) (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫ ω, f ω ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioc 0 ‖f‖, μ.real {a : α | t ≤ f a} :=
integral_eq_integral_meas_le_of_hasFiniteIntegral _ _ f_nn (f.integrable μ).2
/-- Assuming `levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < ε`, we can bound `∫ f ∂μ` in terms of
`∫ t in (0, ‖f‖], ν (thickening ε {x | f(x) ≥ t}) dt` and `‖f‖`. -/
lemma BoundedContinuousFunction.integral_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt (μ ν : Measure Ω)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hμν : levyProkhorovEDist μ ν < ENNReal.ofReal ε) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫ ω, f ω ∂μ
≤ (∫ t in Ioc 0 ‖f‖, ν.real (thickening ε {a | t ≤ f a})) + ε * ‖f‖ := by
rw [BoundedContinuousFunction.integral_eq_integral_meas_le f μ f_nn]
have key : (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ μ.real {a | t ≤ f a})
≤ (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ν.real (thickening ε {a | t ≤ f a}) + ε) := by
intro t
simp only [measureReal_def]
convert ENNReal.toReal_mono ?_ <| left_measure_le_of_levyProkhorovEDist_lt hμν
(B := {a | t ≤ f a}) (f.continuous.measurable measurableSet_Ici)
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_add (measure_ne_top ν _) ofReal_ne_top, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal ε_pos.le]
· exact ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨measure_ne_top ν _, ofReal_ne_top⟩
have intble₁ : IntegrableOn (fun t ↦ μ.real {a | t ≤ f a}) (Ioc 0 ‖f‖) := by
apply Measure.integrableOn_of_bounded (M := μ.real univ) measure_Ioc_lt_top.ne
· apply (Measurable.ennreal_toReal (Antitone.measurable ?_)).aestronglyMeasurable
exact fun _ _ hst ↦ measure_mono (fun _ h ↦ hst.trans h)
· apply Eventually.of_forall <| fun t ↦ ?_
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
exact measureReal_mono (subset_univ _)
have intble₂ : IntegrableOn (fun t ↦ ν.real (thickening ε {a | t ≤ f a})) (Ioc 0 ‖f‖) := by
apply Measure.integrableOn_of_bounded (M := ν.real univ) measure_Ioc_lt_top.ne
· apply (Measurable.ennreal_toReal (Antitone.measurable ?_)).aestronglyMeasurable
exact fun _ _ hst ↦ measure_mono <| thickening_subset_of_subset ε (fun _ h ↦ hst.trans h)
· apply Eventually.of_forall <| fun t ↦ ?_
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (measure_ne_top _ _) <| measure_mono (subset_univ _)
apply le_trans (setIntegral_mono (s := Ioc 0 ‖f‖) ?_ ?_ key)
· rw [integral_add]
· apply add_le_add_left
| simp [(mul_comm _ ε).le]
· exact intble₂
· exact integrable_const ε
· exact intble₁
· exact intble₂.add <| integrable_const ε
/-- A monotone decreasing convergence lemma for integrals of measures of thickenings:
`∫ t in (0, ‖f‖], μ (thickening ε {x | f(x) ≥ t}) dt` tends to
`∫ t in (0, ‖f‖], μ {x | f(x) ≥ t} dt` as `ε → 0`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_meas_thickening_le (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ)
{A : Set ℝ} (A_finmeas : volume A ≠ ∞) (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
Tendsto (fun ε ↦ ∫ t in A, (Measure.real μ (thickening ε {a | t ≤ f a}))) (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ))
(𝓝 (∫ t in A, (Measure.real μ {a | t ≤ f a}))) := by
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (G := ℝ) (μ := volume.restrict A)
(F := fun ε t ↦ (μ (thickening ε {a | t ≤ f a}))) (f := fun t ↦ (μ {a | t ≤ f a})) 1
· apply Eventually.of_forall fun n ↦ Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable ?_
simp only [measurable_coe_nnreal_real_iff]
apply measurable_toNNReal.comp <| Antitone.measurable (fun s t hst ↦ ?_)
exact measure_mono <| thickening_subset_of_subset _ <| fun ω h ↦ hst.trans h
· apply Eventually.of_forall (fun i ↦ ?_)
apply Eventually.of_forall (fun t ↦ ?_)
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, NNReal.abs_eq, Pi.one_apply]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono one_ne_top prob_le_one
· have aux : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict A) := ⟨by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, A_finmeas]⟩
apply integrable_const
· apply Eventually.of_forall (fun t ↦ ?_)
simp only [NNReal.tendsto_coe]
apply (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal _).comp
· apply tendsto_measure_thickening_of_isClosed ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨1, ⟨Real.zero_lt_one, measure_ne_top _ _⟩⟩
· exact isClosed_le continuous_const f.continuous
· exact measure_ne_top _ _
/-- The identity map `LevyProkhorov (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) → ProbabilityMeasure Ω` is continuous. -/
lemma LevyProkhorov.continuous_equiv_probabilityMeasure :
Continuous (LevyProkhorov.equiv (α := ProbabilityMeasure Ω)) := by
refine SeqContinuous.continuous ?_
intro μs ν hμs
set P := LevyProkhorov.equiv _ ν -- more palatable notation
set Ps := fun n ↦ LevyProkhorov.equiv _ (μs n) -- more palatable notation
rw [ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto]
refine fun f ↦ tendsto_integral_of_forall_limsup_integral_le_integral ?_ f
intro f f_nn
by_cases f_zero : ‖f‖ = 0
· simp only [norm_eq_zero] at f_zero
simp [f_zero, limsup_const]
have norm_f_pos : 0 < ‖f‖ := lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (fun a => f_zero a.symm)
apply _root_.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro δ δ_pos
apply limsup_le_of_le ?_
· obtain ⟨εs, ⟨_, ⟨εs_pos, εs_lim⟩⟩⟩ := exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have ε_of_room := Tendsto.add (tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.mp hμs) εs_lim
have ε_of_room' : Tendsto (fun n ↦ dist (μs n) ν + εs n) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) := by
rw [tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff]
refine ⟨by simpa using ε_of_room, Eventually.of_forall fun n ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [mem_Ioi]
linarith [εs_pos n, dist_nonneg (x := μs n) (y := ν)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/LevyProkhorovMetric.lean | 387 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.PresheafedSpace.Gluing
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
/-!
# Gluing Schemes
Given a family of gluing data of schemes, we may glue them together.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData`: A structure containing the family of gluing data.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.glued`: The glued scheme.
This is defined as the multicoequalizer of `∐ V i j ⇉ ∐ U i`, so that the general colimit API
can be used.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι`: The immersion `ι i : U i ⟶ glued` for each `i : J`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.isoCarrier`: The isomorphism between the underlying space
of the glued scheme and the gluing of the underlying topological spaces.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.gluedCover`: The glue data associated with an open cover.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.fromGlued`: The canonical morphism
`𝒰.gluedCover.glued ⟶ X`. This has an `is_iso` instance.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.glueMorphisms`: We may glue a family of compatible
morphisms defined on an open cover of a scheme.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_isOpenImmersion`: The map `ι i : U i ⟶ glued`
is an open immersion for each `i : J`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_jointly_surjective` : The underlying maps of
`ι i : U i ⟶ glued` are jointly surjective.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.vPullbackConeIsLimit` : `V i j` is the pullback
(intersection) of `U i` and `U j` over the glued space.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_eq_iff` : `ι i x = ι j y` if and only if they coincide
when restricted to `V i i`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.isOpen_iff` : A subset of the glued scheme is open iff
all its preimages in `U i` are open.
## Implementation details
All the hard work is done in `AlgebraicGeometry/PresheafedSpace/Gluing.lean` where we glue
presheafed spaces, sheafed spaces, and locally ringed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace
open CategoryTheory.GlueData
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
namespace Scheme
/-- A family of gluing data consists of
1. An index type `J`
2. A scheme `U i` for each `i : J`.
3. A scheme `V i j` for each `i j : J`.
(Note that this is `J × J → Scheme` rather than `J → J → Scheme` to connect to the
limits library easier.)
4. An open immersion `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` for each `i j : ι`.
5. A transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` for each `i j : ι`.
such that
6. `f i i` is an isomorphism.
7. `t i i` is the identity.
8. `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through `V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` via some
`t' : V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V j k ×[U j] V j i`.
9. `t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _`.
We can then glue the schemes `U i` together by identifying `V i j` with `V j i`, such
that the `U i`'s are open subschemes of the glued space.
-/
structure GlueData extends CategoryTheory.GlueData Scheme where
f_open : ∀ i j, IsOpenImmersion (f i j)
attribute [instance] GlueData.f_open
namespace GlueData
variable (D : GlueData.{u})
local notation "𝖣" => D.toGlueData
/-- The glue data of locally ringed spaces associated to a family of glue data of schemes. -/
abbrev toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData : LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData :=
{ f_open := D.f_open
toGlueData := 𝖣.mapGlueData forgetToLocallyRingedSpace }
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData).toGlueData.f i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.f i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.f
i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i : 𝖣.J) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData).toGlueData.ι i) := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData.ι_isOpenImmersion
/-- (Implementation). The glued scheme of a glue data.
This should not be used outside this file. Use `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.glued` instead. -/
def gluedScheme : Scheme := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.scheme
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.glued
intro x
obtain ⟨i, y, rfl⟩ := D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.ι_jointly_surjective x
refine ⟨_, ((D.U i).affineCover.map y).toLRSHom ≫
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.ι i, ?_⟩
constructor
· simp only [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom, SheafedSpace.comp_base, TopCat.hom_comp,
ContinuousMap.coe_comp, Set.range_comp]
refine Set.mem_image_of_mem _ ?_
exact (D.U i).affineCover.covers y
· infer_instance
instance : CreatesColimit 𝖣.diagram.multispan forgetToLocallyRingedSpace :=
createsColimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso D.gluedScheme
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (𝖣.diagramIso forgetToLocallyRingedSpace).symm)
instance : PreservesColimit (𝖣.diagram.multispan) forgetToTop :=
inferInstanceAs (PreservesColimit (𝖣.diagram).multispan (forgetToLocallyRingedSpace ⋙
LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat))
instance : HasMulticoequalizer 𝖣.diagram :=
hasColimit_of_created _ forgetToLocallyRingedSpace
/-- The glued scheme of a glued space. -/
abbrev glued : Scheme :=
𝖣.glued
/-- The immersion from `D.U i` into the glued space. -/
abbrev ι (i : D.J) : D.U i ⟶ D.glued :=
𝖣.ι i
/-- The gluing as sheafed spaces is isomorphic to the gluing as presheafed spaces. -/
abbrev isoLocallyRingedSpace :
D.glued.toLocallyRingedSpace ≅ D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.glued :=
𝖣.gluedIso forgetToLocallyRingedSpace
theorem ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv (i : D.J) :
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.ι i ≫
D.isoLocallyRingedSpace.inv = (𝖣.ι i).toLRSHom :=
𝖣.ι_gluedIso_inv forgetToLocallyRingedSpace i
instance ι_isOpenImmersion (i : D.J) : IsOpenImmersion (𝖣.ι i) := by
rw [IsOpenImmersion, ← D.ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv]; infer_instance
theorem ι_jointly_surjective (x : 𝖣.glued.carrier) :
∃ (i : D.J) (y : (D.U i).carrier), (D.ι i).base y = x :=
𝖣.ι_jointly_surjective (forgetToTop ⋙ forget TopCat) x
/-- Promoted to higher priority to short circuit simplifier. -/
@[simp (high), reassoc]
theorem glue_condition (i j : D.J) : D.t i j ≫ D.f j i ≫ D.ι j = D.f i j ≫ D.ι i :=
𝖣.glue_condition i j
/-- The pullback cone spanned by `V i j ⟶ U i` and `V i j ⟶ U j`.
This is a pullback diagram (`vPullbackConeIsLimit`). -/
def vPullbackCone (i j : D.J) : PullbackCone (D.ι i) (D.ι j) :=
PullbackCone.mk (D.f i j) (D.t i j ≫ D.f j i) (by simp)
/-- The following diagram is a pullback, i.e. `Vᵢⱼ` is the intersection of `Uᵢ` and `Uⱼ` in `X`.
```
Vᵢⱼ ⟶ Uᵢ
| |
↓ ↓
Uⱼ ⟶ X
```
-/
def vPullbackConeIsLimit (i j : D.J) : IsLimit (D.vPullbackCone i j) :=
𝖣.vPullbackConeIsLimitOfMap forgetToLocallyRingedSpace i j
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.vPullbackConeIsLimit _ _)
local notation "D_" => TopCat.GlueData.toGlueData <|
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toTopGlueData
/-- The underlying topological space of the glued scheme is isomorphic to the gluing of the
underlying spaces -/
def isoCarrier :
D.glued.carrier ≅ (D_).glued := by
refine (PresheafedSpace.forget _).mapIso ?_ ≪≫
GlueData.gluedIso _ (PresheafedSpace.forget.{_, _, u} _)
refine SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.mapIso ?_ ≪≫
SheafedSpace.GlueData.isoPresheafedSpace _
refine LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.mapIso ?_ ≪≫
LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData.isoSheafedSpace _
exact Scheme.GlueData.isoLocallyRingedSpace _
@[simp]
theorem ι_isoCarrier_inv (i : D.J) :
(D_).ι i ≫ D.isoCarrier.inv = (D.ι i).base := by
delta isoCarrier
rw [Iso.trans_inv, GlueData.ι_gluedIso_inv_assoc, Functor.mapIso_inv, Iso.trans_inv,
Functor.mapIso_inv, Iso.trans_inv, SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace_map, forget_map,
forget_map, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base, ← Category.assoc,
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.ι_isoPresheafedSpace_inv i]
erw [← Category.assoc, D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.ι_isoSheafedSpace_inv i]
change (_ ≫ D.isoLocallyRingedSpace.inv).base = _
rw [D.ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv i]
/-- An equivalence relation on `Σ i, D.U i` that holds iff `𝖣.ι i x = 𝖣.ι j y`.
See `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_eq_iff`. -/
def Rel (a b : Σ i, ((D.U i).carrier : Type _)) : Prop :=
∃ x : (D.V (a.1, b.1)).carrier, (D.f _ _).base x = a.2 ∧ (D.t _ _ ≫ D.f _ _).base x = b.2
theorem ι_eq_iff (i j : D.J) (x : (D.U i).carrier) (y : (D.U j).carrier) :
(𝖣.ι i).base x = (𝖣.ι j).base y ↔ D.Rel ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ := by
refine Iff.trans ?_
(TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toTopGlueData
i j x y)
rw [← ((TopCat.mono_iff_injective D.isoCarrier.inv).mp _).eq_iff, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
· simp_rw [← D.ι_isoCarrier_inv]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
· infer_instance
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set D.glued.carrier) : IsOpen U ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen ((D.ι i).base ⁻¹' U) := by
rw [← (TopCat.homeoOfIso D.isoCarrier.symm).isOpen_preimage, TopCat.GlueData.isOpen_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro i
rw [← Set.preimage_comp, ← ι_isoCarrier_inv]
rfl
/-- The open cover of the glued space given by the glue data. -/
@[simps -isSimp]
def openCover (D : Scheme.GlueData) : OpenCover D.glued where
J := D.J
obj := D.U
map := D.ι
f x := (D.ι_jointly_surjective x).choose
covers x := ⟨_, (D.ι_jointly_surjective x).choose_spec.choose_spec⟩
end GlueData
namespace Cover
variable {X : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : OpenCover.{u} X)
/-- (Implementation) the transition maps in the glue data associated with an open cover. -/
def gluedCoverT' (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
pullback (pullback.fst (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map y)) (pullback.fst (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map z)) ⟶
pullback (pullback.fst (𝒰.map y) (𝒰.map z)) (pullback.fst (𝒰.map y) (𝒰.map x)) := by
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).inv
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· simp [pullback.condition]
· simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_fst_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
𝒰.gluedCoverT' x y z ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_fst_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_snd_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_snd_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
theorem glued_cover_cocycle_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp
theorem glued_cover_cocycle_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp [pullback.condition]
theorem glued_cover_cocycle (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y = 𝟙 _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp_rw [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
· apply glued_cover_cocycle_fst
· apply glued_cover_cocycle_snd
/-- The glue data associated with an open cover.
The canonical isomorphism `𝒰.gluedCover.glued ⟶ X` is provided by `𝒰.fromGlued`. -/
@[simps]
def gluedCover : Scheme.GlueData.{u} where
J := 𝒰.J
U := 𝒰.obj
V := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => pullback (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map y)
| f _ _ := pullback.fst _ _
f_id _ := inferInstance
t _ _ := (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Gluing.lean | 314 | 316 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Homogeneous
/-!
# The universal characteristic polynomial
In this file we define the universal characteristic polynomial `Matrix.charpoly.univ`,
which is the charactistic polynomial of the matrix with entries `Xᵢⱼ`,
and hence has coefficients that are multivariate polynomials.
It is universal in the sense that one obtains the characteristic polynomial of a matrix `M`
by evaluating the coefficients of `univ` at the entries of `M`.
We use it to show that the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial
of a matrix are homogeneous polynomials in the matrix entries.
## Main results
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ`: the universal characteristic polynomial
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ_map_eval₂Hom`: evaluating `univ` on the entries of a matrix `M`
gives the characteristic polynomial of `M`.
* `Matrix.charpoly.univ_coeff_isHomogeneous`:
the `i`-th coefficient of `univ` is a homogeneous polynomial of degree `n - i`.
-/
namespace Matrix.charpoly
variable {R S : Type*} (n : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable (f : R →+* S)
variable (R) in
/-- The universal characteristic polynomial for `n × n`-matrices,
is the charactistic polynomial of `Matrix.mvPolynomialX n n ℤ` with entries `Xᵢⱼ`.
Its `i`-th coefficient is a homogeneous polynomial of degree `n - i`,
see `Matrix.charpoly.univ_coeff_isHomogeneous`.
By evaluating the coefficients at the entries of a matrix `M`,
one obtains the characteristic polynomial of `M`,
see `Matrix.charpoly.univ_map_eval₂Hom`. -/
noncomputable
abbrev univ : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (n × n) R) :=
charpoly <| mvPolynomialX n n R
open MvPolynomial RingHomClass in
@[simp]
lemma univ_map_eval₂Hom (M : n × n → S) :
(univ R n).map (eval₂Hom f M) = charpoly (Matrix.of M.curry) := by
rw [univ, ← charpoly_map, coe_eval₂Hom, ← mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ f (Matrix.of M.curry)]
simp only [of_apply, Function.curry_apply, Prod.mk.eta]
lemma univ_map_map :
(univ R n).map (MvPolynomial.map f) = univ S n := by
rw [MvPolynomial.map, univ_map_eval₂Hom]; rfl
@[simp]
lemma univ_coeff_eval₂Hom (M : n × n → S) (i : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom f M ((univ R n).coeff i) =
(charpoly (Matrix.of M.curry)).coeff i := by
rw [← univ_map_eval₂Hom n f M, Polynomial.coeff_map]
variable (R)
lemma univ_monic : (univ R n).Monic := charpoly_monic (mvPolynomialX n n R)
lemma univ_natDegree [Nontrivial R] : (univ R n).natDegree = Fintype.card n :=
charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim (mvPolynomialX n n R)
@[simp]
lemma univ_coeff_card : (univ R n).coeff (Fintype.card n) = 1 := by
suffices Polynomial.coeff (univ ℤ n) (Fintype.card n) = 1 by
| rw [← univ_map_map n (Int.castRingHom R), Polynomial.coeff_map, this, map_one]
rw [← univ_natDegree ℤ n]
exact (univ_monic ℤ n).leadingCoeff
open MvPolynomial in
lemma optionEquivLeft_symm_univ_isHomogeneous :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Univ.lean | 78 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Nat.odd_iff, ← Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd] at hn
rw [← mul_two, ← @Nat.cast_two (ZMod n), ← ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime 2 hn, Units.mul_left_eq_zero]
theorem ne_neg_self {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a := by
rwa [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero hn]
theorem neg_one_ne_one {n : ℕ} [Fact (2 < n)] : (-1 : ZMod n) ≠ 1 :=
CharP.neg_one_ne_one (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_mod_two (a : ZMod 2) : -a = a := by
fin_cases a <;> apply Fin.ext <;> simp [Fin.coe_neg, Int.natMod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem natAbs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.natAbs : ZMod 2) = a := by
cases a
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, Int.ofNat_eq_coe]
· simp only [neg_eq_self_mod_two, Nat.cast_succ, Int.natAbs, Int.cast_negSucc]
theorem val_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(val_eq_zero a).not
theorem val_pos {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} : 0 < a.val ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem val_eq_one : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : 1 < n) (a : ZMod n), a.val = 1 ↔ a = 1
| 0, hn, _
| 1, hn, _ => by simp at hn
| n + 2, _, _ => by simp only [val, ZMod, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_one]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ 2 * a.val = n := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← two_mul]
cases n
· rw [@mul_eq_zero ℤ, @mul_eq_zero ℕ, val_eq_zero]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (by simp) Or.inl, fun h =>
Or.inr (h.elim id fun h => h.elim (by simp) id)⟩
conv_lhs =>
rw [← a.natCast_zmod_val, ← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_mul, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨m, he⟩
rcases m with - | m
· rw [mul_zero, mul_eq_zero] at he
rcases he with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | he)
exact Or.inl (a.val_eq_zero.1 he)
cases m
· right
rwa [show 0 + 1 = 1 from rfl, mul_one] at he
refine (a.val_lt.not_le <| Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ zero_lt_two).elim
rw [he, mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
simp
· rintro (rfl | h)
· rw [val_zero, mul_zero]
apply dvd_zero
· rw [h]
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_cast_zmod_lt {m : ℕ} [NeZero m] (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ZMod m) :
(a.cast : ZMod n).val < m := by
rcases m with (⟨⟩|⟨m⟩); · cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
by_cases h : m < n
· rcases n with (⟨⟩|⟨n⟩); · simp at h
rw [← natCast_val, val_cast_of_lt]
· apply a.val_lt
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (ZMod.val_lt a)) h
· rw [not_lt] at h
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (ZMod.val_lt _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_succ m))
theorem neg_val' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = (n - a.val) % n :=
calc
(-a).val = val (-a) % n := by rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (-a).val_lt]
_ = (n - val a) % n :=
Nat.ModEq.add_right_cancel' (val a)
(by
rw [Nat.ModEq, ← val_add, neg_add_cancel, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a.val_le, Nat.mod_self,
val_zero])
theorem neg_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = if a = 0 then 0 else n - a.val := by
rw [neg_val']
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [if_pos h, h, val_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.mod_self]
rw [if_neg h]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
apply Nat.sub_lt (NeZero.pos n)
contrapose! h
rwa [Nat.le_zero, val_eq_zero] at h
theorem val_neg_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [nz : NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) [na : NeZero a] :
(- a).val = n - a.val := by simp_all [neg_val a, na.out]
theorem val_sub {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : b.val ≤ a.val) :
(a - b).val = a.val - b.val := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· cases hb; simp
· have : NeZero b := ⟨hb⟩
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, val_add, val_neg_of_ne_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt (val_lt _)),
add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.add_mod_left]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_of_lt (val_lt _))
theorem val_cast_eq_val_of_lt {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] {a : ZMod m}
(h : a.val < n) : (a.cast : ZMod n).val = a.val := by
have nzn : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => cases nzn; simp_all
| succ n => exact Fin.val_cast_of_lt h
theorem cast_cast_zmod_of_le {m n : ℕ} [hm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast (cast a : ZMod n) : ZMod m) = a := by
have : NeZero n := ⟨((Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hm.out).trans_le h).ne'⟩
rw [cast_eq_val, val_cast_eq_val_of_lt (a.val_lt.trans_le h), natCast_zmod_val]
theorem val_pow {m n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} [ilt : Fact (1 < n)] (h : a.val ^ m < n) :
(a ^ m).val = a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
have : a.val ^ m < n := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· by_cases hm : m = 0
· cases hm; simp [ilt.out]
· simp only [val_zero, ne_eq, hm, not_false_eq_true, zero_pow, Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h]
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by rwa [gt_iff_lt, ZMod.val_pos]) (Nat.le_succ m)) h
rw [pow_succ, ZMod.val_mul, ih this, ← pow_succ, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_pow_le {m n : ℕ} [Fact (1 < n)] {a : ZMod n} : (a ^ m).val ≤ a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
apply le_trans (ZMod.val_mul_le _ _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ ih
theorem natAbs_min_of_le_div_two (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) (he : (x : ZMod n) = y) (hl : x.natAbs ≤ n / 2) :
x.natAbs ≤ y.natAbs := by
rw [intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub] at he
obtain ⟨m, he⟩ := he
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at he
subst he
obtain rfl | hm := eq_or_ne m 0
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
apply hl.trans
rw [← add_le_add_iff_right x.natAbs]
refine le_trans (le_trans ((add_le_add_iff_left _).2 hl) ?_) (Int.natAbs_sub_le _ _)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast]
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| Int.natAbs_pos.2 hm)
rw [← mul_two]; apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
end ZMod
theorem RingHom.ext_zmod {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] (f g : ZMod n →+* R) : f = g := by
ext a
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective a
let φ : ℤ →+* R := f.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
let ψ : ℤ →+* R := g.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
show φ k = ψ k
rw [φ.ext_int ψ]
namespace ZMod
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
instance subsingleton_ringHom [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n →+* R) :=
⟨RingHom.ext_zmod⟩
instance subsingleton_ringEquiv [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n ≃+* R) :=
⟨fun f g => by
rw [RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_inj_iff]
apply RingHom.ext_zmod _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem ringHom_map_cast [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) (k : ZMod n) : f (cast k) = k := by
cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast] at f k ⊢; simp
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [map_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` has a right inverse. -/
theorem ringHom_rightInverse [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) :
Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → R) f :=
ringHom_map_cast f
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` is surjective. -/
theorem ringHom_surjective [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) : Function.Surjective f :=
(ringHom_rightInverse f).surjective
@[simp]
lemma castHom_self : ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl (ZMod n) = RingHom.id (ZMod n) :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
lemma castHom_comp {m d : ℕ} (hm : n ∣ m) (hd : m ∣ d) :
(castHom hm (ZMod n)).comp (castHom hd (ZMod m)) = castHom (dvd_trans hm hd) (ZMod n) :=
RingHom.ext_zmod _ _
section lift
variable (n) {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
/-- The map from `ZMod n` induced by `f : ℤ →+ A` that maps `n` to `0`. -/
def lift : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 } ≃ (ZMod n →+ A) :=
(Equiv.subtypeEquivRight <| by
intro f
rw [ker_intCastAddHom]
constructor
· rintro hf _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [f.map_zsmul, zsmul_zero, f.mem_ker, hf]
· intro h
exact h (AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples _)).trans <|
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).liftOfRightInverse cast intCast_zmod_cast
variable (f : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 })
@[simp]
theorem lift_coe (x : ℤ) : lift n f (x : ZMod n) = f.val x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
theorem lift_castAddHom (x : ℤ) : lift n f (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n) x) = f.1 x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_coe : ZMod.lift n f ∘ ((↑) : ℤ → _) = f :=
funext <| lift_coe _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_castAddHom : (ZMod.lift n f).comp (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)) = f :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <| lift_castAddHom _ _
lemma lift_injective {f : {f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0}} :
Injective (lift n f) ↔ ∀ m, f.1 m = 0 → (m : ZMod n) = 0 := by
simp only [← AddMonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff, eq_bot_iff, SetLike.le_def,
ZMod.intCast_surjective.forall, ZMod.lift_coe, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, AddSubgroup.mem_bot]
end lift
end ZMod
/-!
### Groups of bounded torsion
For `G` a group and `n` a natural number, `G` having torsion dividing `n`
(`∀ x : G, n • x = 0`) can be derived from `Module R G` where `R` has characteristic dividing `n`.
It is however painful to have the API for such groups `G` stated in this generality, as `R` does not
appear anywhere in the lemmas' return type. Instead of writing the API in terms of a general `R`, we
therefore specialise to the canonical ring of order `n`, namely `ZMod n`.
This spelling `Module (ZMod n) G` has the extra advantage of providing the canonical action by
`ZMod n`. It is however Type-valued, so we might want to acquire a Prop-valued version in the
future.
-/
section Module
variable {n : ℕ} {S G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [AddSubgroupClass S G] {K : S} {x : G}
section general
variable [Module (ZMod n) G] {x : G}
lemma zmod_smul_mem (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ a : ZMod n, a • x ∈ K := by
simpa [ZMod.forall, Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul] using zsmul_mem hx
/-- This cannot be made an instance because of the `[Module (ZMod n) G]` argument and the fact that
`n` only appears in the second argument of `SMulMemClass`, which is an `OutParam`. -/
lemma smulMemClass : SMulMemClass S (ZMod n) G where smul_mem _ _ {_x} hx := zmod_smul_mem hx _
namespace AddSubgroupClass
instance instZModSMul : SMul (ZMod n) K where smul a x := ⟨a • x, zmod_smul_mem x.2 _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zmod_smul (a : ZMod n) (x : K) : ↑(a • x) = (a • x : G) := rfl
instance instZModModule : Module (ZMod n) K :=
Subtype.coe_injective.module _ (AddSubmonoidClass.subtype K) coe_zmod_smul
end AddSubgroupClass
variable (n)
lemma ZModModule.char_nsmul_eq_zero (x : G) : n • x = 0 := by
simp [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul (ZMod n)]
variable (G) in
lemma ZModModule.char_ne_one [Nontrivial G] : n ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : G)
exact hx <| by simpa using char_nsmul_eq_zero 1 x
variable (G) in
lemma ZModModule.two_le_char [NeZero n] [Nontrivial G] : 2 ≤ n := by
have := NeZero.ne n
have := char_ne_one n G
omega
lemma ZModModule.periodicPts_add_left [NeZero n] (x : G) : periodicPts (x + ·) = .univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun y ↦ ⟨n, NeZero.pos n, by
simpa [char_nsmul_eq_zero, IsPeriodicPt] using isFixedPt_id _⟩
end general
section two
variable [Module (ZMod 2) G]
lemma ZModModule.add_self (x : G) : x + x = 0 := by
simpa [two_nsmul] using char_nsmul_eq_zero 2 x
lemma ZModModule.neg_eq_self (x : G) : -x = x := by simp [add_self, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]
lemma ZModModule.sub_eq_add (x y : G) : x - y = x + y := by simp [neg_eq_self, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma ZModModule.add_add_add_cancel (x y z : G) : (x + y) + (y + z) = x + z := by
simpa [sub_eq_add] using sub_add_sub_cancel x y z
end two
end Module
section AddGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddGroup α] {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
lemma nsmul_zmod_val_inv_nsmul (hn : (Nat.card α).Coprime n) (a : α) :
n • (n⁻¹ : ZMod (Nat.card α)).val • a = a := by
rw [← mul_nsmul', ← mod_natCard_nsmul, ← ZMod.val_natCast, Nat.cast_mul,
ZMod.mul_val_inv hn.symm, ZMod.val_one_eq_one_mod, mod_natCard_nsmul, one_nsmul]
@[simp]
lemma zmod_val_inv_nsmul_nsmul (hn : (Nat.card α).Coprime n) (a : α) :
(n⁻¹ : ZMod (Nat.card α)).val • n • a = a := by
rw [nsmul_left_comm, nsmul_zmod_val_inv_nsmul hn]
end AddGroup
section Group
variable {α : Type*} [Group α] {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Without the `existing`, `to_additive` chokes on `Inv (ZMod n)`.
@[to_additive existing (attr := simp) nsmul_zmod_val_inv_nsmul]
lemma pow_zmod_val_inv_pow (hn : (Nat.card α).Coprime n) (a : α) :
(a ^ (n⁻¹ : ZMod (Nat.card α)).val) ^ n = a := by
rw [← pow_mul', ← pow_mod_natCard, ← ZMod.val_natCast, Nat.cast_mul, ZMod.mul_val_inv hn.symm,
ZMod.val_one_eq_one_mod, pow_mod_natCard, pow_one]
@[to_additive existing (attr := simp) zmod_val_inv_nsmul_nsmul]
lemma pow_pow_zmod_val_inv (hn : (Nat.card α).Coprime n) (a : α) :
(a ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ZMod (Nat.card α)).val = a := by rw [pow_right_comm, pow_zmod_val_inv_pow hn]
end Group
open ZMod
/-- The range of `(m * · + k)` on natural numbers is the set of elements `≥ k` in the
residue class of `k` mod `m`. -/
lemma Nat.range_mul_add (m k : ℕ) :
Set.range (fun n : ℕ ↦ m * n + k) = {n : ℕ | (n : ZMod m) = k ∧ k ≤ n} := by
ext n
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
conv => enter [1, 1, y]; rw [add_comm, eq_comm]
refine ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨?_, le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨_, ha⟩⟩, fun ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· simpa using congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod m) ha
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp H₂
simp only [ha, Nat.cast_add, add_eq_left, ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at H₁
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := H₁
exact ⟨b, ha⟩
/-- Equivalence between `ℕ` and `ZMod N × ℕ`, sending `n` to `(n mod N, n / N)`. -/
def Nat.residueClassesEquiv (N : ℕ) [NeZero N] : ℕ ≃ ZMod N × ℕ where
toFun n := (↑n, n / N)
invFun p := p.1.val + N * p.2
left_inv n := by simpa only [val_natCast] using mod_add_div n N
right_inv p := by
ext1
· simp only [add_comm p.1.val, cast_add, cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul, natCast_val,
cast_id', id_eq, zero_add]
· simp only [add_comm p.1.val, mul_add_div (NeZero.pos _),
(Nat.div_eq_zero_iff).2 <| .inr p.1.val_lt, add_zero]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 1,397 | 1,401 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Heather Macbeth, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.HaveI
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Qq
/-!
## `positivity` core functionality
This file sets up the `positivity` tactic and the `@[positivity]` attribute,
which allow for plugging in new positivity functionality around a positivity-based driver.
The actual behavior is in `@[positivity]`-tagged definitions in `Tactic.Positivity.Basic`
and elsewhere.
-/
open Lean
open Lean.Meta Qq Lean.Elab Term
/-- Attribute for identifying `positivity` extensions. -/
syntax (name := positivity) "positivity " term,+ : attr
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq' {α : Sort*} {a c b : α} (hab : (a : α) ≠ c) (hbc : a = b) : b ≠ c := hbc ▸ hab
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
variable {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (zα : Q(Zero $α)) (pα : Q(PartialOrder $α))
/-- The result of `positivity` running on an expression `e` of type `α`. -/
inductive Strictness (e : Q($α)) where
| positive (pf : Q(0 < $e))
| nonnegative (pf : Q(0 ≤ $e))
| nonzero (pf : Q($e ≠ 0))
| none
deriving Repr
/-- Gives a generic description of the `positivity` result. -/
def Strictness.toString {e : Q($α)} : Strictness zα pα e → String
| positive _ => "positive"
| nonnegative _ => "nonnegative"
| nonzero _ => "nonzero"
| none => "none"
/-- Extract a proof that `e` is nonnegative, if possible, from `Strictness` information about `e`.
-/
def Strictness.toNonneg {e} : Strictness zα pα e → Option Q(0 ≤ $e)
| .positive pf => some q(le_of_lt $pf)
| .nonnegative pf => some pf
| _ => .none
/-- Extract a proof that `e` is nonzero, if possible, from `Strictness` information about `e`. -/
def Strictness.toNonzero {e} : Strictness zα pα e → Option Q($e ≠ 0)
| .positive pf => some q(ne_of_gt $pf)
| .nonzero pf => some pf
| _ => .none
/-- An extension for `positivity`. -/
structure PositivityExt where
/-- Attempts to prove an expression `e : α` is `>0`, `≥0`, or `≠0`. -/
eval {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (zα : Q(Zero $α)) (pα : Q(PartialOrder $α)) (e : Q($α)) :
MetaM (Strictness zα pα e)
/-- Read a `positivity` extension from a declaration of the right type. -/
def mkPositivityExt (n : Name) : ImportM PositivityExt := do
let { env, opts, .. } ← read
IO.ofExcept <| unsafe env.evalConstCheck PositivityExt opts ``PositivityExt n
/-- Each `positivity` extension is labelled with a collection of patterns
which determine the expressions to which it should be applied. -/
abbrev Entry := Array (Array DiscrTree.Key) × Name
/-- Environment extensions for `positivity` declarations -/
initialize positivityExt : PersistentEnvExtension Entry (Entry × PositivityExt)
(List Entry × DiscrTree PositivityExt) ←
-- we only need this to deduplicate entries in the DiscrTree
have : BEq PositivityExt := ⟨fun _ _ => false⟩
let insert kss v dt := kss.foldl (fun dt ks => dt.insertCore ks v) dt
registerPersistentEnvExtension {
mkInitial := pure ([], {})
addImportedFn := fun s => do
let dt ← s.foldlM (init := {}) fun dt s => s.foldlM (init := dt) fun dt (kss, n) => do
pure (insert kss (← mkPositivityExt n) dt)
pure ([], dt)
addEntryFn := fun (entries, s) ((kss, n), ext) => ((kss, n) :: entries, insert kss ext s)
exportEntriesFn := fun s => s.1.reverse.toArray
}
initialize registerBuiltinAttribute {
name := `positivity
descr := "adds a positivity extension"
applicationTime := .afterCompilation
add := fun declName stx kind => match stx with
| `(attr| positivity $es,*) => do
unless kind == AttributeKind.global do
throwError "invalid attribute 'positivity', must be global"
let env ← getEnv
unless (env.getModuleIdxFor? declName).isNone do
throwError "invalid attribute 'positivity', declaration is in an imported module"
if (IR.getSorryDep env declName).isSome then return -- ignore in progress definitions
let ext ← mkPositivityExt declName
let keys ← MetaM.run' <| es.getElems.mapM fun stx => do
let e ← TermElabM.run' <| withSaveInfoContext <| withAutoBoundImplicit <|
withReader ({ · with ignoreTCFailures := true }) do
let e ← elabTerm stx none
let (_, _, e) ← lambdaMetaTelescope (← mkLambdaFVars (← getLCtx).getFVars e)
return e
DiscrTree.mkPath e
setEnv <| positivityExt.addEntry env ((keys, declName), ext)
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
}
variable {A : Type*} {e : A}
lemma lt_of_le_of_ne' {a b : A} [PartialOrder A] :
(a : A) ≤ b → b ≠ a → a < b := fun h₁ h₂ => lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ h₂.symm
lemma pos_of_isNat {n : ℕ} [Semiring A] [PartialOrder A] [IsOrderedRing A] [Nontrivial A]
(h : NormNum.IsNat e n) (w : Nat.ble 1 n = true) : 0 < (e : A) := by
rw [NormNum.IsNat.to_eq h rfl]
apply Nat.cast_pos.2
simpa using w
lemma nonneg_of_isNat {n : ℕ} [Semiring A] [PartialOrder A] [IsOrderedRing A]
(h : NormNum.IsNat e n) : 0 ≤ (e : A) := by
rw [NormNum.IsNat.to_eq h rfl]
exact Nat.cast_nonneg n
lemma nz_of_isNegNat {n : ℕ} [Ring A] [PartialOrder A] [IsStrictOrderedRing A]
(h : NormNum.IsInt e (.negOfNat n)) (w : Nat.ble 1 n = true) : (e : A) ≠ 0 := by
| rw [NormNum.IsInt.neg_to_eq h rfl]
simp only [ne_eq, neg_eq_zero]
apply ne_of_gt
simpa using w
lemma pos_of_isRat {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} [Ring A] [LinearOrder A] [IsStrictOrderedRing A] :
| Mathlib/Tactic/Positivity/Core.lean | 136 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
theorem pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
⟨le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity⟩
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ multiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity ▸ pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity, not_le]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [hf.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, not_le]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_eq_coe {n : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
simp [h]
· apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [h]
norm_cast
simp
· rw [and_imp]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
simp [← emultiplicity_eq_coe, hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_ofNat {a b n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
emultiplicity a b = (ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) ↔ a ^ ofNat(n) ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (ofNat(n) + 1) ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_eq_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_eq_iff := FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left (b : α) (ha : IsUnit a) : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b :=
(·.not_unit ha)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_isUnit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left (b : α) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity 1 b := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_one_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_one_left (b : α) : emultiplicity 1 b = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left _)
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.one_right (ha : FiniteMultiplicity a 1) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 := by
simp [ha.multiplicity_eq_iff, ha.not_dvd_of_one_right]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.one_right
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left (a : α) (u : αˣ) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity (u : α) a :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left a u.isUnit
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_unit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [← ENat.coe_zero, emultiplicity_eq_coe]
simp
· simpa [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 hf] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.1 hf 1
theorem multiplicity_eq_zero :
multiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b :=
(emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one).symm.trans emultiplicity_eq_zero
theorem emultiplicity_ne_zero :
emultiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem multiplicity_ne_zero :
multiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
∃ c : α, b = a ^ multiplicity a b * c ∧ ¬a ∣ c := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
refine ⟨c, hc, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [hk, ← mul_assoc, ← _root_.pow_succ] at hc
have h₁ : a ^ (multiplicity a b + 1) ∣ b := ⟨k, hc⟩
exact (hfin.multiplicity_eq_iff.1 (by simp)).2 h₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by classical
constructor
· exact fun h n hab ↦ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_trans (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hab) h)
· intro h
unfold emultiplicity
-- aesop? says
split
next h_1 =>
obtain ⟨w, h_1⟩ := h_1
split
next h_2 =>
simp_all only [cast_le, le_find_iff, lt_find_iff, Decidable.not_not, le_refl,
not_true_eq_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
next h_2 => simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, le_top]
next h_1 =>
simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, not_true_eq_false, top_le_iff,
dite_eq_right_iff, ENat.coe_ne_top, imp_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff {c d : β} (hab : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
(hcd : FiniteMultiplicity c d) :
multiplicity a b ≤ multiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, ENat.some_eq_coe, ← hab.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
← hcd.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ↔ c ^ n ∣ d :=
⟨fun h n =>
⟨emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.le n, emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.ge n⟩,
fun h => le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mp)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mpr)⟩
theorem le_emultiplicity_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity (f a) (f b) :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n ↦ by rw [← map_pow]; exact map_dvd f
theorem emultiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : emultiplicity (f a) (f b) = emultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff, ← map_pow, map_dvd_iff]
theorem multiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : multiplicity (f a) (f b) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_map_eq f)
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right {a b c : α} (h : b ∣ c) :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a c :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun _ hb => hb.trans h
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity a c :=
le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.dvd)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.symm.dvd)
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
multiplicity a b = multiplicity a c :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right h)
theorem dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < emultiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
pow_one a ▸ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (Order.add_one_le_of_lt h)
theorem dvd_of_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < multiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos (lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity h)
theorem dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < multiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨dvd_of_multiplicity_pos, fun hdvd => Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simpa [multiplicity_eq_zero])⟩
theorem dvd_iff_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_pos_iff.trans dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
theorem Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff {a b : ℕ} : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ a ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall, not_and_or, not_ne_iff, not_lt,
Nat.le_zero]
exact
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun hb =>
have ha : a ≠ 0 := fun ha => hb <| zero_dvd_iff.mp <| by rw [ha] at h; exact h 1
Classical.by_contradiction fun ha1 : a ≠ 1 =>
have ha_gt_one : 1 < a :=
lt_of_not_ge fun _ =>
match a with
| 0 => ha rfl
| 1 => ha1 rfl
| b+2 => by omega
not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (h b)) (b.lt_pow_self ha_gt_one),
fun h => by cases h <;> simp [*]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias Nat.multiplicity_finite_iff := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff
alias ⟨_, Dvd.multiplicity_pos⟩ := dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right {a b c : α} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c)) :
FiniteMultiplicity a c := (mul_comm b c ▸ hf).mul_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_right := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right
|
theorem emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a)
(hb : IsUnit b) : emultiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_zero.mpr fun h ↦ ha (isUnit_of_dvd_unit h hb)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 532 | 535 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
/-!
# Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
Basic definition of multivariate QPF. QPFs form a compositional framework
for defining inductive and coinductive types, their quotients and nesting.
The idea is based on building ever larger functors. For instance, we can define
a list using a shape functor:
```lean
inductive ListShape (a b : Type)
| nil : ListShape
| cons : a -> b -> ListShape
```
This shape can itself be decomposed as a sum of product which are themselves
QPFs. It follows that the shape is a QPF and we can take its fixed point
and create the list itself:
```lean
def List (a : Type) := fix ListShape a -- not the actual notation
```
We can continue and define the quotient on permutation of lists and create
the multiset type:
```lean
def Multiset (a : Type) := QPF.quot List.perm List a -- not the actual notion
```
And `Multiset` is also a QPF. We can then create a novel data type (for Lean):
```lean
inductive Tree (a : Type)
| node : a -> Multiset Tree -> Tree
```
An unordered tree. This is currently not supported by Lean because it nests
an inductive type inside of a quotient. We can go further and define
unordered, possibly infinite trees:
```lean
coinductive Tree' (a : Type)
| node : a -> Multiset Tree' -> Tree'
```
by using the `cofix` construct. Those options can all be mixed and
matched because they preserve the properties of QPF. The latter example,
`Tree'`, combines fixed point, co-fixed point and quotients.
## Related modules
* constructions
* Fix
* Cofix
* Quot
* Comp
* Sigma / Pi
* Prj
* Const
each proves that some operations on functors preserves the QPF structure
-/
set_option linter.style.longLine false in
/-!
## Reference
[Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
open MvFunctor
/-- Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
-/
class MvQPF {n : ℕ} (F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*) extends MvFunctor F where
P : MvPFunctor.{u} n
abs : ∀ {α}, P α → F α
repr : ∀ {α}, F α → P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α ⟹ β) (p : P α), abs (f <$$> p) = f <$$> abs p
namespace MvQPF
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*} [q : MvQPF F]
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
/-!
### Show that every MvQPF is a lawful MvFunctor.
-/
protected theorem id_map {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) : TypeVec.id <$$> x = x := by
rw [← abs_repr x, ← abs_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_map {α β γ : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α) :
(g ⊚ f) <$$> x = g <$$> f <$$> x := by
rw [← abs_repr x, ← abs_map, ← abs_map, ← abs_map]
rfl
instance (priority := 100) lawfulMvFunctor : LawfulMvFunctor F where
id_map := @MvQPF.id_map n F _
comp_map := @comp_map n F _
-- Lifting predicates and relations
theorem liftP_iff {α : TypeVec n} (p : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop) (x : F α) :
LiftP p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = abs ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, p (f i j) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases h : repr y with ⟨a, f⟩
use a, fun i j => (f i j).val
constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
intro i j
apply (f i j).property
rintro ⟨a, f, h₀, h₁⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i j => ⟨f i j, h₁ i j⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, h₀]; rfl
theorem liftR_iff {α : TypeVec n} (r : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → α i → Prop) (x y : F α) :
LiftR r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = abs ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = abs ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, r (f₀ i j) (f₁ i j) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
rcases h : repr u with ⟨a, f⟩
use a, fun i j => (f i j).val.fst, fun i j => (f i j).val.snd
constructor
· rw [← xeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
constructor
· rw [← yeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
intro i j
exact (f i j).property
rintro ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i j => ⟨(f₀ i j, f₁ i j), h i j⟩⟩
dsimp; constructor
· rw [xeq, ← abs_map]; rfl
rw [yeq, ← abs_map]; rfl
open Set
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
theorem mem_supp {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) (i) (u : α i) :
u ∈ supp x i ↔ ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ := by
rw [supp]; dsimp; constructor
· intro h a f haf
have : LiftP (fun i u => u ∈ f i '' univ) x := by
rw [liftP_iff]
refine ⟨a, f, haf.symm, ?_⟩
intro i u
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)
exact h this
intro h p; rw [liftP_iff]
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩
rcases h a f xeq.symm with ⟨i, _, hi⟩
rw [← hi]; apply h'
theorem supp_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i} (x : F α) :
supp x i = { u | ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ } := by ext; apply mem_supp
theorem has_good_supp_iff {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) :
(∀ p, LiftP p x ↔ ∀ (i), ∀ u ∈ supp x i, p i u) ↔
∃ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x ∧ ∀ i a' f', abs ⟨a', f'⟩ = x → f i '' univ ⊆ f' i '' univ := by
constructor
· intro h
have : LiftP (supp x) x := by rw [h]; introv; exact id
rw [liftP_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, ?_⟩
intro a' f' h''
rintro hu u ⟨j, _h₂, hfi⟩
have hh : u ∈ supp x a' := by rw [← hfi]; apply h'
exact (mem_supp x _ u).mp hh _ _ hu
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, h⟩ p; rw [liftP_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a', f', xeq', h'⟩ i u usuppx
rcases (mem_supp x _ u).mp (@usuppx) a' f' xeq'.symm with ⟨i, _, f'ieq⟩
rw [← f'ieq]
apply h'
intro h'
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, ?_⟩; intro j y
apply h'; rw [mem_supp]
intro a' f' xeq'
apply h _ a' f' xeq'
apply mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)
/-- A qpf is said to be uniform if every polynomial functor
representing a single value all have the same range. -/
def IsUniform : Prop :=
∀ ⦃α : TypeVec n⦄ (a a' : q.P.A) (f : q.P.B a ⟹ α) (f' : q.P.B a' ⟹ α),
abs ⟨a, f⟩ = abs ⟨a', f'⟩ → ∀ i, f i '' univ = f' i '' univ
/-- does `abs` preserve `liftp`? -/
def LiftPPreservation : Prop :=
∀ ⦃α : TypeVec n⦄ (p : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop) (x : q.P α), LiftP p (abs x) ↔ LiftP p x
/-- does `abs` preserve `supp`? -/
def SuppPreservation : Prop :=
∀ ⦃α⦄ (x : q.P α), supp (abs x) = supp x
theorem supp_eq_of_isUniform (h : q.IsUniform) {α : TypeVec n} (a : q.P.A) (f : q.P.B a ⟹ α) :
∀ i, supp (abs ⟨a, f⟩) i = f i '' univ := by
intro; ext u; rw [mem_supp]; constructor
· intro h'
apply h' _ _ rfl
intro h' a' f' e
rw [← h _ _ _ _ e.symm]; apply h'
theorem liftP_iff_of_isUniform (h : q.IsUniform) {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) (p : ∀ i, α i → Prop) :
LiftP p x ↔ ∀ (i), ∀ u ∈ supp x i, p i u := by
rw [liftP_iff, ← abs_repr x]
obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := repr x; constructor
· rintro ⟨a', f', abseq, hf⟩ u
rw [supp_eq_of_isUniform h, h _ _ _ _ abseq]
rintro b ⟨i, _, hi⟩
rw [← hi]
apply hf
intro h'
refine ⟨a, f, rfl, fun _ i => h' _ _ ?_⟩
rw [supp_eq_of_isUniform h]
| exact ⟨i, mem_univ i, rfl⟩
theorem supp_map (h : q.IsUniform) {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (x : F α) (i) :
supp (g <$$> x) i = g i '' supp x i := by
rw [← abs_repr x]; obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := repr x; rw [← abs_map, MvPFunctor.map_eq]
rw [supp_eq_of_isUniform h, supp_eq_of_isUniform h, ← image_comp]
rfl
theorem suppPreservation_iff_isUniform : q.SuppPreservation ↔ q.IsUniform := by
constructor
· intro h α a a' f f' h' i
rw [← MvPFunctor.supp_eq, ← MvPFunctor.supp_eq, ← h, h', h]
· rintro h α ⟨a, f⟩
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Basic.lean | 232 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ￢a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ￢a ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem hnot_bot : ￢(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_top : ￢(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
theorem hnot_hnot_le : ￢￢a ≤ a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
theorem hnot_anti : Antitone (hnot : α → α) := fun _ _ h => hnot_le_comm.1 <| hnot_hnot_le.trans h
theorem hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ￢b ≤ ￢a :=
hnot_anti h
@[simp]
theorem hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ￢￢￢a = ￢a :=
hnot_hnot_le.antisymm <| hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : Codisjoint (￢￢a) b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_right_iff : Codisjoint a (￢￢b) ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, hnot_hnot_hnot]
theorem le_hnot_inf_hnot : ￢(a ⊔ b) ≤ ￢a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf (hnot_anti le_sup_left) <| hnot_anti le_sup_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sup_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a ⊔ b) = ￢￢a ⊔ ￢￢b := by
refine ((hnot_inf_distrib _ _).ge.trans <| hnot_anti le_hnot_inf_hnot).antisymm' ?_
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_assoc, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff,
codisjoint_left_comm, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff, ← codisjoint_assoc, sup_comm]
| exact codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sdiff_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a \ b) = ￢￢a \ ￢￢b := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine hnot_le_comm.1 ((hnot_anti sdiff_le_inf_hnot).trans' ?_)
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 882 | 886 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, David Kurniadi Angdinata, Devon Tuma, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Ideal
/-!
# Quotients of polynomial rings
-/
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
private noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
let e := RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (fun x => by
exact eval_C : Function.RightInverse (fun a : R => (C a : R[X])) (@aeval R R _ _ _ x))
{ e with commutes' := fun r => e.apply_symm_apply r }
private noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {X - C x}) ≃ₐ[R] (R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) :=
Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R (ker_evalRingHom x).symm
-- Porting note: need to split this definition into two sub-definitions to prevent time out
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $x \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle X - x \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span ({X - C x} : Set R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 x).trans (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 x)
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_mk (x : R) (p : R[X]) :
quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ p) = p.eval x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_symm_apply (x : R) (y : R) :
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x).symm y = algebraMap R _ y :=
rfl
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $y \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle x, X - y \rangle \cong R / \langle x \rangle$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (x y : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C x, X - C y} : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R ⧸ (Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) :=
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by rw [Ideal.span_insert, sup_comm]).trans <|
(DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R _ _).symm.trans <|
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlg _ _ (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv y) rfl).trans <|
Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [Ideal.map_span, Set.image_singleton]; congr 2; exact eval_C
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at elements $y(X) \in R[X]$ and $x \in R$
induces an isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X, Y] / \langle X - x, Y - y(X) \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} :
@AlgEquiv R (R[X][X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C (X - C x), X - C y} : Ideal <| R[X][X])) R _ _ _
(Ideal.Quotient.algebra R) _ :=
((quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (X - C x) y).restrictScalars R).trans <| quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x
lemma modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_quotient_eq_zero (p q : R[X]) (hq : q.Monic) :
p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ (p : R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {q}) = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_dvd]
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
theorem quotient_map_C_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ a ∈ I, ((Quotient.mk (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) a = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact mem_map_of_mem _ ha
theorem eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ f ∈ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]), eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X f = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [← sum_monomial_eq a]
dsimp
rw [eval₂_sum]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun n _ => ?_
dsimp
rw [eval₂_monomial (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left (Polynomial.ext fun m => ?_) (X ^ n)
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, coeff_C]
by_cases h : m = 0
· simpa [h] using Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 ((mem_map_C_iff.1 ha) n)
· simp [h]
/-- If `I` is an ideal of `R`, then the ring polynomials over the quotient ring `I.quotient` is
isomorphic to the quotient of `R[X]` by the ideal `map C I`,
where `map C I` contains exactly the polynomials whose coefficients all lie in `I`. -/
def polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (I : Ideal R) :
(R ⧸ I)[X] ≃+* R[X] ⧸ (map C I : Ideal R[X]) where
toFun :=
eval₂RingHom
(Quotient.lift I ((Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) quotient_map_C_eq_zero)
(Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) X)
invFun :=
Quotient.lift (map C I : Ideal R[X]) (eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X)
eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero
map_mul' f g := by simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_mul]
map_add' f g := by simp only [eval₂_add, coe_eval₂RingHom]
left_inv := by
intro f
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, hp, hq, RingHom.map_add]
· rintro n ⟨x⟩
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul', Quotient.lift_mk, Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk,
Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul, coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C,
RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X, Function.comp_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f⟩
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was `simp_intro p q hp hq`
intros p q hp hq
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, map_add, Quotient.lift_mk,
coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq ⊢
rw [hp, hq]
· intro n a
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, ← C_mul' a (X ^ n), Quotient.lift_mk,
Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul,
coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X,
Function.comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial.symm (Quotient.mk _ f) = f.map (Quotient.mk I) := by
rw [polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial, RingEquiv.symm_mk, RingEquiv.coe_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Quotient.lift_mk, coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← Polynomial.map_map,
← eval₂_eq_eval_map, Polynomial.eval₂_C_X]
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_map_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (f.map <| Quotient.mk I) =
Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) f := by
apply (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial I).symm.injective
rw [RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply, polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `R[x]/(P)` is an integral domain. -/
theorem isDomain_map_C_quotient {P : Ideal R} (_ : IsPrime P) :
IsDomain (R[X] ⧸ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X])) :=
MulEquiv.isDomain (Polynomial (R ⧸ P)) (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial P).symm
/-- Given any ring `R` and an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, we get a map `R → R[x] → R[x]/I`.
If we let `R` be the image of `R` in `R[x]/I` then we also have a map `R[x] → R'[x]`.
In particular we can map `I` across this map, to get `I'` and a new map `R' → R'[x] → R'[x]/I`.
This theorem shows `I'` will not contain any non-zero constant polynomials. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_polynomial_mem_map_range (I : Ideal R[X]) (x : ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).range)
(hx : C x ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict)) : x = 0 := by
let i := ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict
have hi' : RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) ≤ I := by
refine fun f hf => polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal I f fun n => ?_
rw [mem_comap, ← Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← RingHom.comp_apply]
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom] at hf
replace hf := congr_arg (fun f : Polynomial _ => f.coeff n) hf
simp only [coeff_map, coeff_zero] at hf
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, RingHom.coe_rangeRestrict] at hf
obtain ⟨x, hx'⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := RingHom.mem_range.1 hx'
refine Subtype.eq ?_
simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
suffices C (i y) ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective (Polynomial.mapRingHom i)
(Polynomial.map_surjective _ (RingHom.rangeRestrict_surjective ((Quotient.mk I).comp C))) this
refine sub_add_cancel (C y) f ▸ I.add_mem (hi' ?_ : C y - f ∈ I) hf.1
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.map_sub, hf.2, sub_eq_zero, coe_mapRingHom, map_C]
exact hx
end
end Ideal
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {R : Type*} {σ : Type*} [CommRing R] {r : R}
theorem quotient_map_C_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} {i : R} (hi : i ∈ I) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) I :
Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))).comp C i = 0 := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ hi
theorem eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} {a : MvPolynomial σ R}
(ha : a ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))) :
eval₂Hom (C.comp (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) X a = 0 := by
rw [as_sum a]
rw [coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_sum]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun n _ => ?_
simp only [eval₂_monomial, Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
suffices coeff n a ∈ I by
rw [← @Ideal.mk_ker R _ I, RingHom.mem_ker] at this
simp only [this, C_0]
exact mem_map_C_iff.1 ha n
lemma quotientEquivQuotientMvPolynomial_rightInverse (I : Ideal R) :
Function.RightInverse
(eval₂ (Ideal.Quotient.lift I
((Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))).comp C)
fun _ hi => quotient_map_C_eq_zero hi)
fun i => Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) (X i))
(Ideal.Quotient.lift (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))
(eval₂Hom (C.comp (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) X) fun _ ha => eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero ha) := by
intro f
apply induction_on f
· intro r
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective r
rw [eval₂_C, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, RingHom.comp_apply, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, eval₂Hom_C,
| RingHom.comp_apply]
· intros p q hp hq
simp only [RingHom.map_add, MvPolynomial.coe_eval₂Hom, coe_eval₂Hom, MvPolynomial.eval₂_add]
at hp hq ⊢
rw [hp, hq]
· intros p i hp
simp only [coe_eval₂Hom] at hp
simp only [hp, coe_eval₂Hom, Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, eval₂_mul, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X]
lemma quotientEquivQuotientMvPolynomial_leftInverse (I : Ideal R) :
Function.LeftInverse
(eval₂ (Ideal.Quotient.lift I
((Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))).comp C)
fun _ hi => quotient_map_C_eq_zero hi)
fun i => Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) (X i))
(Ideal.Quotient.lift (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))
(eval₂Hom (C.comp (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) X) fun _ ha => eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero ha) := by
intro f
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective f
apply induction_on f
· intro r
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Quotient.lean | 226 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Triangles in graphs
A *triangle* in a simple graph is a `3`-clique, namely a set of three vertices that are
pairwise adjacent.
This module defines and proves properties about triangles in simple graphs.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.FarFromTriangleFree`: Predicate for a graph such that one must remove a lot of edges
from it for it to become triangle-free. This is the crux of the Triangle Removal Lemma.
## TODO
* Generalise `FarFromTriangleFree` to other graphs, to state and prove the Graph Removal Lemma.
-/
open Finset Nat
open Fintype (card)
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {α β 𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
{G H : SimpleGraph α} {ε δ : 𝕜}
section LocallyLinear
/-- A graph has edge-disjoint triangles if each edge belongs to at most one triangle. -/
def EdgeDisjointTriangles (G : SimpleGraph α) : Prop :=
(G.cliqueSet 3).Pairwise fun x y ↦ (x ∩ y : Set α).Subsingleton
/-- A graph is locally linear if each edge belongs to exactly one triangle. -/
def LocallyLinear (G : SimpleGraph α) : Prop :=
G.EdgeDisjointTriangles ∧ ∀ ⦃x y⦄, G.Adj x y → ∃ s, G.IsNClique 3 s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
protected lemma LocallyLinear.edgeDisjointTriangles : G.LocallyLinear → G.EdgeDisjointTriangles :=
And.left
nonrec lemma EdgeDisjointTriangles.mono (h : G ≤ H) (hH : H.EdgeDisjointTriangles) :
G.EdgeDisjointTriangles := hH.mono <| cliqueSet_mono h
@[simp] lemma edgeDisjointTriangles_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).EdgeDisjointTriangles := by
simp [EdgeDisjointTriangles]
@[simp] lemma locallyLinear_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).LocallyLinear := by simp [LocallyLinear]
lemma EdgeDisjointTriangles.map (f : α ↪ β) (hG : G.EdgeDisjointTriangles) :
(G.map f).EdgeDisjointTriangles := by
rw [EdgeDisjointTriangles, cliqueSet_map (by norm_num : 3 ≠ 1),
(Finset.map_injective f).injOn.pairwise_image]
classical
rintro s hs t ht hst
dsimp [Function.onFun]
rw [← coe_inter, ← map_inter, coe_map, coe_inter]
exact (hG hs ht hst).image _
lemma LocallyLinear.map (f : α ↪ β) (hG : G.LocallyLinear) : (G.map f).LocallyLinear := by
refine ⟨hG.1.map _, ?_⟩
rintro _ _ ⟨a, b, h, rfl, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨s, hs, ha, hb⟩ := hG.2 h
exact ⟨s.map f, hs.map, mem_map_of_mem _ ha, mem_map_of_mem _ hb⟩
@[simp] lemma locallyLinear_comap {G : SimpleGraph β} {e : α ≃ β} :
(G.comap e).LocallyLinear ↔ G.LocallyLinear := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← comap_map_eq e.symm.toEmbedding G, comap_symm, map_symm]
exact h.map _
· rw [← Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, ← map_symm]
exact LocallyLinear.map _
lemma edgeDisjointTriangles_iff_mem_sym2_subsingleton :
G.EdgeDisjointTriangles ↔
∀ ⦃e : Sym2 α⦄, ¬ e.IsDiag → {s ∈ G.cliqueSet 3 | e ∈ (s : Finset α).sym2}.Subsingleton := by
classical
have (a b) (hab : a ≠ b) : {s ∈ (G.cliqueSet 3 : Set (Finset α)) | s(a, b) ∈ (s : Finset α).sym2}
= {s | G.Adj a b ∧ ∃ c, G.Adj a c ∧ G.Adj b c ∧ s = {a, b, c}} := by
ext s
simp only [mem_sym2_iff, Sym2.mem_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq, Set.sep_and,
Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_sep_iff, mem_cliqueSet_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
and_and_and_comm (b := _ ∈ _), and_self, is3Clique_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨c, d, e, hcd, hce, hde, rfl⟩, hab⟩
simp only [mem_insert, mem_singleton] at hab
obtain ⟨rfl | rfl | rfl, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ := hab
any_goals
simp only [*, adj_comm, true_and, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true] at *
any_goals
first
| exact ⟨c, by aesop⟩
| exact ⟨d, by aesop⟩
| exact ⟨e, by aesop⟩
| simp only [*, adj_comm, true_and, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true] at *
exact ⟨c, by aesop⟩
| simp only [*, adj_comm, true_and, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true] at *
exact ⟨d, by aesop⟩
| simp only [*, adj_comm, true_and, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true] at *
exact ⟨e, by aesop⟩
· rintro ⟨hab, c, hac, hbc, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨a, b, c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp [*]
constructor
· rw [Sym2.forall]
rintro hG a b hab
simp only [Sym2.isDiag_iff_proj_eq] at hab
rw [this _ _ (Sym2.mk_isDiag_iff.not.2 hab)]
rintro _ ⟨hab, c, hac, hbc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨-, d, had, hbd, rfl⟩
refine hG.eq ?_ ?_ (Set.Nontrivial.not_subsingleton ⟨a, ?_, b, ?_, hab.ne⟩) <;>
simp [is3Clique_triple_iff, *]
· simp only [EdgeDisjointTriangles, is3Clique_iff, Set.Pairwise, mem_cliqueSet_iff, Ne,
forall_exists_index, and_imp, ← Set.not_nontrivial_iff (s := _ ∩ _), not_imp_not,
Set.Nontrivial, Set.mem_inter_iff, mem_coe]
rintro hG _ a b c hab hac hbc rfl _ d e f hde hdf hef rfl g hg₁ hg₂ h hh₁ hh₂ hgh
refine hG (Sym2.mk_isDiag_iff.not.2 hgh) ⟨⟨a, b, c, ?_⟩, by simpa using And.intro hg₁ hh₁⟩
⟨⟨d, e, f, ?_⟩, by simpa using And.intro hg₂ hh₂⟩ <;> simp [is3Clique_triple_iff, *]
alias ⟨EdgeDisjointTriangles.mem_sym2_subsingleton, _⟩ :=
edgeDisjointTriangles_iff_mem_sym2_subsingleton
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [DecidableRel G.Adj]
instance EdgeDisjointTriangles.instDecidable : Decidable G.EdgeDisjointTriangles :=
decidable_of_iff ((G.cliqueFinset 3 : Set (Finset α)).Pairwise fun x y ↦ (#(x ∩ y) ≤ 1)) <| by
simp only [coe_cliqueFinset, EdgeDisjointTriangles, Finset.card_le_one, ← coe_inter]; rfl
instance LocallyLinear.instDecidable : Decidable G.LocallyLinear :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∧ _))
lemma EdgeDisjointTriangles.card_edgeFinset_le (hG : G.EdgeDisjointTriangles) :
3 * #(G.cliqueFinset 3) ≤ #G.edgeFinset := by
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_one #G.edgeFinset]
refine card_mul_le_card_mul (fun s e ↦ e ∈ s.sym2) ?_ (fun e he ↦ ?_)
· simp only [is3Clique_iff, mem_cliqueFinset_iff, mem_sym2_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro _ a b c hab hac hbc rfl
have : #{s(a, b), s(a, c), s(b, c)} = 3 := by
refine card_eq_three.2 ⟨_, _, _, ?_, ?_, ?_, rfl⟩ <;> simp [hab.ne, hac.ne, hbc.ne]
rw [← this]
refine card_mono ?_
simp [insert_subset, *]
· simpa only [card_le_one, mem_bipartiteBelow, and_imp, Set.Subsingleton, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
mem_cliqueFinset_iff, mem_cliqueSet_iff]
using hG.mem_sym2_subsingleton (G.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet <| mem_edgeFinset.1 he)
lemma LocallyLinear.card_edgeFinset (hG : G.LocallyLinear) :
#G.edgeFinset = 3 * #(G.cliqueFinset 3) := by
refine hG.edgeDisjointTriangles.card_edgeFinset_le.antisymm' ?_
rw [← mul_comm, ← mul_one #_]
refine card_mul_le_card_mul (fun e s ↦ e ∈ s.sym2) ?_ ?_
· simpa [Sym2.forall, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, -Finset.card_eq_zero, Finset.card_ne_zero,
Finset.Nonempty]
using hG.2
simp only [mem_cliqueFinset_iff, is3Clique_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro _ a b c hab hac hbc rfl
calc
_ ≤ #{s(a, b), s(a, c), s(b, c)} := card_le_card ?_
_ ≤ 3 := (card_insert_le _ _).trans (succ_le_succ <| (card_insert_le _ _).trans_eq <| by
rw [card_singleton])
simp only [subset_iff, Sym2.forall, mem_sym2_iff, le_eq_subset, mem_bipartiteBelow, mem_insert,
mem_edgeFinset, mem_singleton, and_imp, mem_edgeSet, Sym2.mem_iff, forall_eq_or_imp,
forall_eq, Quotient.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
rintro d e hde (rfl | rfl | rfl) (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp [*] at *
end LocallyLinear
variable (G ε)
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
/-- A simple graph is *`ε`-far from triangle-free* if one must remove at least
`ε * (card α) ^ 2` edges to make it triangle-free. -/
def FarFromTriangleFree : Prop := G.DeleteFar (fun H ↦ H.CliqueFree 3) <| ε * (card α ^ 2 : ℕ)
variable {G ε}
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem farFromTriangleFree_iff :
G.FarFromTriangleFree ε ↔ ∀ ⦃H : SimpleGraph α⦄, [DecidableRel H.Adj] → H ≤ G → H.CliqueFree 3 →
ε * (card α ^ 2 : ℕ) ≤ #G.edgeFinset - #H.edgeFinset := deleteFar_iff
alias ⟨farFromTriangleFree.le_card_sub_card, _⟩ := farFromTriangleFree_iff
nonrec theorem FarFromTriangleFree.mono (hε : G.FarFromTriangleFree ε) (h : δ ≤ ε) :
G.FarFromTriangleFree δ := hε.mono <| by gcongr
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] in
theorem FarFromTriangleFree.cliqueFinset_nonempty' (hH : H ≤ G) (hG : G.FarFromTriangleFree ε)
(hcard : #G.edgeFinset - #H.edgeFinset < ε * (card α ^ 2 : ℕ)) :
(H.cliqueFinset 3).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_ne_empty <|
cliqueFinset_eq_empty_iff.not.2 fun hH' => (hG.le_card_sub_card hH hH').not_lt hcard
private lemma farFromTriangleFree_of_disjoint_triangles_aux {tris : Finset (Finset α)}
(htris : tris ⊆ G.cliqueFinset 3)
(pd : (tris : Set (Finset α)).Pairwise fun x y ↦ (x ∩ y : Set α).Subsingleton) (hHG : H ≤ G)
(hH : H.CliqueFree 3) : #tris ≤ #G.edgeFinset - #H.edgeFinset := by
rw [← card_sdiff (edgeFinset_mono hHG), ← card_attach]
by_contra! hG
have ⦃t⦄ (ht : t ∈ tris) :
∃ x y, x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ x ≠ y ∧ s(x, y) ∈ G.edgeFinset \ H.edgeFinset := by
by_contra! h
refine hH t ?_
simp only [not_and, mem_sdiff, not_not, mem_edgeFinset, mem_edgeSet] at h
obtain ⟨x, y, z, xy, xz, yz, rfl⟩ := is3Clique_iff.1 (mem_cliqueFinset_iff.1 <| htris ht)
rw [is3Clique_triple_iff]
refine ⟨h _ _ ?_ ?_ xy.ne xy, h _ _ ?_ ?_ xz.ne xz, h _ _ ?_ ?_ yz.ne yz⟩ <;> simp
choose fx fy hfx hfy hfne fmem using this
let f (t : {x // x ∈ tris}) : Sym2 α := s(fx t.2, fy t.2)
have hf (x) (_ : x ∈ tris.attach) : f x ∈ G.edgeFinset \ H.edgeFinset := fmem _
obtain ⟨⟨t₁, ht₁⟩, -, ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩, -, tne, t : s(_, _) = s(_, _)⟩ :=
exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to hG hf
dsimp at t
have i := pd ht₁ ht₂ (Subtype.val_injective.ne tne)
rw [Sym2.eq_iff] at t
obtain t | t := t
· exact hfne _ (i ⟨hfx ht₁, t.1.symm ▸ hfx ht₂⟩ ⟨hfy ht₁, t.2.symm ▸ hfy ht₂⟩)
· exact hfne _ (i ⟨hfx ht₁, t.1.symm ▸ hfy ht₂⟩ ⟨hfy ht₁, t.2.symm ▸ hfx ht₂⟩)
/-- If there are `ε * (card α)^2` disjoint triangles, then the graph is `ε`-far from being
triangle-free. -/
lemma farFromTriangleFree_of_disjoint_triangles (tris : Finset (Finset α))
(htris : tris ⊆ G.cliqueFinset 3)
(pd : (tris : Set (Finset α)).Pairwise fun x y ↦ (x ∩ y : Set α).Subsingleton)
(tris_big : ε * (card α ^ 2 : ℕ) ≤ #tris) :
G.FarFromTriangleFree ε := by
rw [farFromTriangleFree_iff]
intros H _ hG hH
rw [← Nat.cast_sub (card_le_card <| edgeFinset_mono hG)]
exact tris_big.trans
(Nat.cast_le.2 <| farFromTriangleFree_of_disjoint_triangles_aux htris pd hG hH)
protected lemma EdgeDisjointTriangles.farFromTriangleFree (hG : G.EdgeDisjointTriangles)
| (tris_big : ε * (card α ^ 2 : ℕ) ≤ #(G.cliqueFinset 3)) :
G.FarFromTriangleFree ε :=
farFromTriangleFree_of_disjoint_triangles _ Subset.rfl (by simpa using hG) tris_big
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Triangle/Basic.lean | 247 | 249 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
/-!
# Endofunctors as a monoidal category.
We give the monoidal category structure on `C ⥤ C`,
and show that when `C` itself is monoidal, it embeds via a monoidal functor into `C ⥤ C`.
## TODO
Can we use this to show coherence results, e.g. a cheap proof that `λ_ (𝟙_ C) = ρ_ (𝟙_ C)`?
I suspect this is harder than is usually made out.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal Functor.Monoidal
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The category of endofunctors of any category is a monoidal category,
with tensor product given by composition of functors
(and horizontal composition of natural transformations).
-/
def endofunctorMonoidalCategory : MonoidalCategory (C ⥤ C) where
tensorObj F G := F ⋙ G
whiskerLeft X _ _ F := whiskerLeft X F
whiskerRight F X := whiskerRight F X
tensorHom α β := α ◫ β
tensorUnit := 𝟭 C
associator F G H := Functor.associator F G H
leftUnitor F := Functor.leftUnitor F
rightUnitor F := Functor.rightUnitor F
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [local instance] endofunctorMonoidalCategory
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_obj (X : C) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).obj X = X := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj (F G : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(F ⊗ G).obj X = G.obj (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_map (F G : C ⥤ C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F ⊗ G).map f = G.map (F.map f) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorMap_app
{F G H K : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(α ⊗ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) ≫ K.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerLeft_app
{F H K : C ⥤ C} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(F ◁ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerRight_app
{F G H : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (X : C) :
(α ▷ H).app X = H.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_hom_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_inv_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- Tensoring on the right gives a monoidal functor from `C` into endofunctors of `C`.
-/
instance : (tensoringRight C).Monoidal :=
Functor.CoreMonoidal.toMonoidal
{ εIso := (rightUnitorNatIso C).symm
μIso := fun X Y => (isoWhiskerRight (curriedAssociatorNatIso C)
((evaluation C (C ⥤ C)).obj X ⋙ (evaluation C C).obj Y)) }
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_ε :
ε (tensoringRight C) = (rightUnitorNatIso C).inv := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_η :
η (tensoringRight C) = (rightUnitorNatIso C).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_μ (X Y : C) (Z : C) :
(μ (tensoringRight C) X Y).app Z = (α_ Z X Y).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_δ (X Y : C) (Z : C) :
(δ (tensoringRight C) X Y).app Z = (α_ Z X Y).inv := rfl
end MonoidalCategory
variable {C}
variable {M : Type*} [Category M] [MonoidalCategory M] (F : M ⥤ (C ⥤ C))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_δ_app (i j : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(μ F i j).app X ≫ (δ F i j).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(μIso F i j).hom_inv_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_μ_app (i j : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(δ F i j).app X ≫ (μ F i j).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(μIso F i j).inv_hom_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_η_app (X : C) [F.Monoidal] : (ε F).app X ≫ (η F).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(εIso F).hom_inv_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem η_ε_app (X : C) [F.Monoidal] : (η F).app X ≫ (ε F).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(εIso F).inv_hom_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(ε F).app X ≫ (F.obj (𝟙_ M)).map f = f ≫ (ε F).app Y :=
((ε F).naturality f).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem η_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(η F).app X ≫ (𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = (η F).app X ≫ f := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) ≫ (μ F m n).app Y = (μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj _).map f :=
(μ F m n).naturality f
-- This is a simp lemma in the reverse direction via `NatTrans.naturality`.
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) =
(F.obj _).map f ≫ (δ F m n).app Y := by simp
-- This is not a simp lemma since it could be proved by the lemmas later.
@[reassoc]
theorem μ_naturality₂ {m n m' n' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (F.obj n').map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (μ F m' n').app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ⊗ g)).app X := by
have := congr_app (μ_natural F f g) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (μ F m' n).app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ▷ n)).app X := by
rw [← tensorHom_id, ← μ_naturality₂ F f (𝟙 n) X]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (μ F m n').app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (m ◁ g)).app X := by
rw [← id_tensorHom, ← μ_naturality₂ F (𝟙 m) g X]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) [F.OplaxMonoidal] :
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) =
(F.map (f ▷ n)).app X ≫ (δ F m' n).app X :=
congr_app (δ_natural_left F f n) X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) =
(F.map (m ◁ g)).app X ≫ (δ F m n').app X :=
congr_app (δ_natural_right F m g) X
@[reassoc]
theorem left_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X) ≫ (μ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
congr_app (left_unitality F n).symm X
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_ε_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X) = (F.map (λ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (δ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X := by
rw [map_leftUnitor_inv]
dsimp
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, μ_δ_app, endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj,
Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_η_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(F.obj n).map ((η F).app X) = (μ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X)), ← Functor.map_comp]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem right_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(ε F).app ((F.obj n).obj X) ≫ (μ F n (𝟙_ M)).app X ≫ (F.map (ρ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
congr_app (Functor.LaxMonoidal.right_unitality F n).symm X
@[simp]
theorem ε_app_obj (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(ε F).app ((F.obj n).obj X) = (F.map (ρ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (δ F n (𝟙_ M)).app X := by
rw [map_rightUnitor_inv]
dsimp
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, μ_δ_app,
endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj, Category.comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem η_app_obj (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(η F).app ((F.obj n).obj X) = (μ F n (𝟙_ M)).app X ≫ (F.map (ρ_ n).hom).app X := by
rw [map_rightUnitor]
dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id, μ_δ_app_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem associativity_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.obj m₃).map ((μ F m₁ m₂).app X) ≫
(μ F (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).app X ≫ (F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).hom).app X =
(μ F m₂ m₃).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (μ F m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).app X := by
have := congr_app (associativity F m₁ m₂ m₃) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_μ_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(F.obj m₃).map ((μ F m₁ m₂).app X) =
(μ F m₂ m₃).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫
(μ F m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).inv).app X ≫ (δ F (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).app X := by
rw [← associativity_app_assoc]
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_μ_inv_app (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(F.obj m₃).map ((δ F m₁ m₂).app X) =
(μ F (m₁ ⊗ m₂) m₃).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ m₂ m₃).hom).app X ≫
(δ F m₁ (m₂ ⊗ m₃)).app X ≫ (δ F m₂ m₃).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) := by
rw [map_associator]
dsimp
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, μ_δ_app_assoc, μ_δ_app,
endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj, Category.comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem obj_zero_map_μ_app {m : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ (F.obj m).obj Y) [F.Monoidal] :
(F.obj (𝟙_ M)).map f ≫ (μ F m (𝟙_ M)).app _ =
(η F).app _ ≫ f ≫ (F.map (ρ_ m).inv).app _ := by
| rw [← cancel_epi ((ε F).app _), ← cancel_mono ((δ F _ _).app _)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem obj_μ_zero_app (m₁ m₂ : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal]:
(μ F (𝟙_ M) m₂).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (μ F m₁ (𝟙_ M ⊗ m₂)).app X ≫
(F.map (α_ m₁ (𝟙_ M) m₂).inv).app X ≫ (δ F (m₁ ⊗ 𝟙_ M) m₂).app X =
(μ F (𝟙_ M) m₂).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫
(F.map (λ_ m₂).hom).app ((F.obj m₁).obj X) ≫ (F.obj m₂).map ((F.map (ρ_ m₁).inv).app X) := by
rw [← obj_η_app_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
simp
/-- If `m ⊗ n ≅ 𝟙_M`, then `F.obj m` is a left inverse of `F.obj n`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def unitOfTensorIsoUnit (m n : M) (h : m ⊗ n ≅ 𝟙_ M) [F.Monoidal] :
F.obj m ⋙ F.obj n ≅ 𝟭 C :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/End.lean | 264 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
end Liftp'
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_diag {α} : dropFun (@prod.diag (n + 1) α) = prod.diag := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (subtypeVal p) = subtypeVal _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (subtypeVal p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (toSubtype p) = toSubtype _ := by
ext i
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (toSubtype p) = _root_.id := by
ext i : 2
induction i; simp [dropFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (ofSubtype p) = ofSubtype _ := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (ofSubtype p) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_RelLast' {α : TypeVec n} {β} (R : β → β → Prop) :
dropFun (RelLast' α R) = repeatEq α :=
rfl
attribute [simp] drop_append1'
open MvFunctor
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
dropFun (f ⊗' f') = (dropFun f ⊗' dropFun f') := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
lastFun (f ⊗' f') = Prod.map (lastFun f) (lastFun f') := by
ext i : 1
induction i; simp [lastFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
dropFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
lastFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_id {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : dropFun (@TypeVec.id _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
| theorem prod_map_id {α β : TypeVec n} : (@TypeVec.id _ α ⊗' @TypeVec.id _ β) = id := by
ext i x : 2
induction i <;> simp only [TypeVec.prod.map, *, dropFun_id]
cases x
· rfl
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 645 | 649 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective
convert_to IsIso (Y.presheaf.map (𝟙 _))
· congr
· -- Porting note: was `apply Subsingleton.helim; rw [this]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
congr
· simp only [unop_op]
congr
apply Subsingleton.helim
rw [this]
· infer_instance
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : PresheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ := by
delta invApp
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
change X.presheaf.map _ = X.presheaf.map _
congr 1
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
have : ∀ (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ), IsIso (f.c.app U) := by
intro U
have : U = op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj (unop U))) := by
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq _ ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')).symm
convert H.c_iso (Opens.map f.base |>.obj <| unop U)
have : IsIso f.c := NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isIso_of_components
let t : X ≃ₜ Y := H.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := Subtype.val
invFun := fun x =>
⟨x, by rw [Set.range_eq_univ.mpr ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')]; trivial⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
exact (TopCat.isoOfHomeo t).isIso_hom
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
infer_instance
end
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- (Implementation.) The projection map when constructing the pullback along an open immersion.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftFst :
Y.restrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base) ⟶ X where
base := pullback.fst _ _
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
hf.invApp _ (unop U) ≫
g.c.app (op (hf.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj (unop U))) ≫
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
simp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, unop_op, op_inj_iff, Opens.map,
Subtype.coe_mk, Functor.op_obj]
apply LE.le.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype _ _).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h₂⟩
-- Porting note: need a slight hand holding
-- used to be `simpa using h₁` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
change _ ∈ _ ⁻¹' _ ∧ _
simp only [TopCat.coe_of, restrict_carrier, Set.preimage_id', Set.mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· change _ ∈ U.unop at h₁
convert h₁
rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
· rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
· rintro _ ⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, h₁, CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩))
naturality := by
intro U V i
induction U
induction V
-- Note: this doesn't fire in `simp` because of reduction of the term via structure eta
-- before discrimination tree key generation
rw [inv_naturality_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl }
theorem pullback_cone_of_left_condition : pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ ≫ g := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun U => ?_
· simpa using pullback.condition
· induction U
-- Porting note: `NatTrans.comp_app` is not picked up by `dsimp`
-- Perhaps see : https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op, whiskerRight_app, pullbackConeOfLeftFst]
-- simp only [ofRestrict_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [app_invApp_assoc,
eqToHom_app, Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
erw [← Y.presheaf.map_comp, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
/-- We construct the pullback along an open immersion via restricting along the pullback of the
maps of underlying spaces (which is also an open embedding).
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g) (Y.ofRestrict _)
(pullback_cone_of_left_condition f g)
variable (s : PullbackCone f g)
/-- (Implementation.) Any cone over `cospan f g` indeed factors through the constructed cone.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftLift : s.pt ⟶ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).pt where
base :=
pullback.lift s.fst.base s.snd.base
(congr_arg (fun x => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base x) s.condition)
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
s.snd.c.app _ ≫
s.pt.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
dsimp only [Opens.map, IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op]
congr 2
let s' : PullbackCone f.base g.base := PullbackCone.mk s.fst.base s.snd.base
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this is just an underscore
(congr_arg Hom.base s.condition)
have : _ = s.snd.base := limit.lift_π s' WalkingCospan.right
conv_lhs =>
rw [← this]
dsimp [s']
rw [Function.comp_def, ← Set.preimage_preimage]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _
(TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base).injective]
rfl))
naturality := fun U V i => by
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1 }
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).fst = s.fst := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = _
simp
· induction x with | op x => ?_
change ((_ ≫ _) ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
have := congr_app s.condition (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj x))
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op] at this
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
replace this := reassoc_of% this
erw [← this, hf.invApp_app_assoc, s.fst.c.naturality_assoc]
simp [eqToHom_map]
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd = s.snd := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = _
simp
· change (_ ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
trans s.snd.c.app x ≫ s.pt.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
instance pullbackConeSndIsOpenImmersion : IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd := by
erw [CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd]
infer_instance
/-- The constructed pullback cone is indeed the pullback. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s
intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans (pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackSndOfLeft : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackFstOfRight : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullbackToBaseIsOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfLeft : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (forget C) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g)
(by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan _) _).toFun
refine (IsLimit.equivIsoLimit ?_).toFun (limit.isLimit (cospan f.base g.base))
fapply Cones.ext
· exact Iso.refl _
change ∀ j, _ = 𝟙 _ ≫ _ ≫ _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp]
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> symm
· erw [Category.comp_id]
exact limit.w (cospan f.base g.base) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
· exact Category.comp_id _
· exact Category.comp_id _)
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfRight : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry (forget C) f g
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
haveI := TopCat.snd_iso_of_left_embedding_range_subset hf.base_open.isEmbedding g.base H
have : IsIso (pullback.snd f g).base := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
change IsIso (_ ≫ pullback.snd _ _)
infer_instance
apply to_iso
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
haveI := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
/-- Two open immersions with equal range is isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfRangeEq [IsOpenImmersion g] (e : Set.range f.base = Set.range g.base) : X ≅ Y where
hom := lift g f (le_of_eq e)
inv := lift f g (le_of_eq e.symm)
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cancel_mono f]; simp
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp
end Pullback
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
section ToSheafedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace C} (Y : SheafedSpace C)
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toSheafedSpace (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : SheafedSpace C where
IsSheaf := by
apply TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_of_iso (sheafIsoOfIso (isoRestrict f).symm).symm
apply TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf
exact (Y.restrict H.base_open).IsSheaf
toPresheafedSpace := X
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpace_toPresheafedSpace : (toSheafedSpace Y f).toPresheafedSpace = X :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of SheafedSpaces.
-/
def toSheafedSpaceHom : toSheafedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_base : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).base = f.base :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_c : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).c = f.c :=
rfl
instance toSheafedSpace_isOpenImmersion : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem sheafedSpace_toSheafedSpace {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
toSheafedSpace Y f = X := by cases X; rfl
end ToSheafedSpace
section ToLocallyRingedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace CommRingCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace)
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toLocallyRingedSpace : LocallyRingedSpace where
toSheafedSpace := toSheafedSpace Y.toSheafedSpace f
isLocalRing x :=
haveI : IsLocalRing (Y.presheaf.stalk (f.base x)) := Y.isLocalRing _
(asIso (f.stalkMap x)).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.isLocalRing
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpace_toSheafedSpace :
(toLocallyRingedSpace Y f).toSheafedSpace = toSheafedSpace Y.1 f :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of LocallyRingedSpace.
-/
def toLocallyRingedSpaceHom : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
⟨f, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpaceHom_val : (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f).toShHom = f :=
rfl
instance toLocallyRingedSpace_isOpenImmersion :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem locallyRingedSpace_toLocallyRingedSpace {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f.1 = X := by
cases X; delta toLocallyRingedSpace; simp
end ToLocallyRingedSpace
theorem isIso_of_subset {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] (U : Opens Y.carrier)
(hU : (U : Set Y.carrier) ⊆ Set.range f.base) : IsIso (f.c.app <| op U) := by
have : U = H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) := by
ext1
exact (Set.inter_eq_left.mpr hU).symm.trans Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range.symm
convert H.c_iso ((Opens.map f.base).obj U)
end PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ f
(SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_isIso _)
instance comp {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
[SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f g
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this local notation is often followed by a space to avoid confusion
-- with the forgetful functor, now it is often wrapped in a parenthesis
local notation "forget" => SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
instance : Mono f :=
(forget).mono_of_mono_map (show @Mono (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ f by infer_instance)
instance forgetMapIsOpenImmersion : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((forget).map f) :=
⟨H.base_open, H.c_iso⟩
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left : HasLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g)) from inferInstance
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right : HasLimit (cospan g f ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f)) from inferInstance
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfLeft : CreatesLimit (cospan f g) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.snd (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ f g _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfRight : CreatesLimit (cospan g f) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.fst (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ g f _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
@Limits.comp_preservesLimit _ _ _ _ _ _ (cospan f g) _ _ forget (PresheafedSpace.forget C)
inferInstance <| by
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget C) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan f g) forget
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan g f) forget
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_snd_of_left :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
have : _ = limit.π (cospan f g) right := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan f g) right
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan f g ⋙ forget)) right
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_fst_of_right :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
delta pullback.fst
have : _ = limit.π (cospan g f) left := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan g f) left
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan g f ⋙ forget)) left
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) one : pullback f g ⟶ Z) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
end Pullback
section OfStalkIso
variable [HasLimits C] [HasColimits C] {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)] [instCC : ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable [(CategoryTheory.forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms]
[PreservesLimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
variable [PreservesFilteredColimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
include instCC in
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[H : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
{ base_open := hf
c_iso := fun U => by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true})
TopCat.Presheaf.app_isIso_of_stalkFunctor_map_iso
(show Y.sheaf ⟶ (TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ f.base).obj X.sheaf from ⟨f.c⟩)
rintro ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
specialize H y
delta PresheafedSpace.Hom.stalkMap at H
haveI H' := TopCat.Presheaf.stalkPushforward.stalkPushforward_iso_of_isInducing C
hf.toIsInducing X.presheaf y
have := IsIso.comp_isIso' H (@IsIso.inv_isIso _ _ _ _ _ H')
rwa [Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id] at this }
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
SheafedSpace.isoMk <| PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict f
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f U
attribute [elementwise] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : SheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : SheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ h U
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
haveI : IsIso (forgetToPresheafedSpace.map f) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso f
apply isIso_of_reflects_iso _ (SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) :
IsIso (f.stalkMap x) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso f x
end
section Prod
-- Porting note: here `ι` should have same universe level as morphism of `C`, so needs explicit
-- universe level now
variable [HasLimits C] {ι : Type v} (F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F]
(i : Discrete ι)
theorem sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding : IsOpenEmbedding (colimit.ι F i).base := by
rw [← show _ = (colimit.ι F i).base from ι_preservesColimitIso_inv (SheafedSpace.forget C) F i]
have : _ = _ ≫ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk)) i :=
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom Discrete.natIsoFunctor i
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
rw [this]
have : colimit.ι _ _ ≫ _ = _ :=
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι.{v, v} ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk) i.as
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
cases i
rw [this, ← Category.assoc]
-- Porting note: `simp_rw` can't use `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso` and
-- `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp`.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso,
TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp]
exact .sigmaMk
theorem image_preimage_is_empty (j : Discrete ι) (h : i ≠ j) (U : Opens (F.obj i)) :
(Opens.map (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) j).base).obj
((Opens.map (preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
((sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i).isOpenMap.functor.obj U)) =
⊥ := by
ext x
apply iff_false_intro
rintro ⟨y, hy, eq⟩
replace eq := ConcreteCategory.congr_arg (preservesColimitIso (SheafedSpace.forget C) F ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma.{v, v} _).hom eq
simp_rw [CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_hom, ← TopCat.comp_app, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base] at eq
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_inv] at eq
change
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F i) ≫ _) y =
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F j) ≫ _) x at eq
cases i; cases j
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc, ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc,
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc, HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc,
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι, TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι] at eq
exact h (congr_arg Discrete.mk (congr_arg Sigma.fst eq))
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion_aux [HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) where
base_open := sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
c_iso U := by
have e : colimit.ι F i = _ :=
(ι_preservesColimitIso_inv SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F i).symm
have H :
IsOpenEmbedding
(colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).base :=
e ▸ sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
suffices IsIso <| (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).c.app <|
op (H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11083): just `convert` is very slow, so helps it a bit
convert this using 2 <;> congr
rw [PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app,
← PresheafedSpace.colimitPresheafObjIsoComponentwiseLimit_hom_π]
-- Porting note: this instance created manually to make the `inferInstance` below work
have inst1 : IsIso (preservesColimitIso forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.c :=
PresheafedSpace.c_isIso_of_iso _
rsuffices : IsIso
(limit.π
(PresheafedSpace.componentwiseDiagram (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
((Opens.map
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
(unop <| op <| H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
(op i))
· infer_instance
apply limit_π_isIso_of_is_strict_terminal
intro j hj
induction j with | op j => ?_
dsimp
convert (F.obj j).sheaf.isTerminalOfEmpty using 3
convert image_preimage_is_empty F i j (fun h => hj (congr_arg op h.symm)) U using 6
exact (congr_arg PresheafedSpace.Hom.base e).symm
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion {ι : Type w} [Small.{v} ι]
(F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F] (i : Discrete ι)
[HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) := by
obtain ⟨ι', ⟨e⟩⟩ := Small.equiv_small (α := ι)
let f : Discrete ι' ≌ Discrete ι := Discrete.equivalence e.symm
have : colimit.ι F i = (colimit.ι F i ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).inv) ≫
(HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).hom := by
simp
rw [this, HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π]
infer_instance
end Prod
end SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {U : TopCat} (f : U ⟶ X.toTopCat) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X.toPresheafedSpace hf
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso [IsIso g] : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ g.1
⟨⟨(inv g).1, by
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.hom_inv_id]
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.inv_hom_id]; constructor <;> rfl⟩⟩
instance comp (g : Z ⟶ Y) [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f.1 g.1
instance mono : Mono f :=
LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.mono_of_mono_map (show Mono f.toShHom by infer_instance)
instance : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.map f) :=
H
/-- An explicit pullback cone over `cospan f g` if `f` is an open immersion. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g := by
refine PullbackCone.mk ?_
(Y.ofRestrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left H.base_open g.base)) ?_
· use PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftFst f.1 g.1
intro x
have := PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition f.1 g.1) x
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
dsimp
infer_instance
· exact LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition _ _)
instance : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd :=
show PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (Y.toPresheafedSpace.ofRestrict _) by infer_instance
/-- The constructed `pullbackConeOfLeft` is indeed limiting. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => by
refine ⟨LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.mk (PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift
f.1 g.1 (PullbackCone.mk _ _ (congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition))) ?_,
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f.1 g.1 _),
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 _), ?_⟩
· intro x
have :=
PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1
(PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1
(congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition)))
x
change _ = _ ≫ s.snd.1.stalkMap x at this
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
infer_instance
· intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans <| LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 <|
PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1 <| congr_arg
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_snd_of_left :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_fst_of_right :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesPullbackOfLeft :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
apply isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpacePreservesOpenImmersion :
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
((LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map f) :=
H
instance forgetToTop_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) := by
change PreservesLimit _ <|
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) ⋙
PresheafedSpace.forget _
-- Porting note: was `apply (config := { instances := False }) ...`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
have : PreservesLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
(PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
apply Limits.comp_preservesLimit
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forget_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace)
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) f g]
-- Porting note: was `inferInstance`
exact IsIso.comp_isIso' inferInstance <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset _ _ H'
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H' ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H' := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
theorem lift_range (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
Set.range (lift f g H').base = f.base ⁻¹' Set.range g.base := by
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
dsimp only [lift]
have : _ = (pullback.fst f g).base :=
PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) f g
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_base, ← this, ← Category.assoc, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp,
Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· rw [TopCat.pullback_fst_range]
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rw [← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective, show (inv (pullback.snd f g)).base = _ from
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _).map_inv _]
infer_instance
end Pullback
/-- An open immersion is isomorphic to the induced open subscheme on its image. -/
noncomputable def isoRestrict {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] :
X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
LocallyRingedSpace.isoOfSheafedSpaceIso <|
SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.preimageIso <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f.1
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
section OfStalkIso
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[stalk_iso : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso _ hf (H := stalk_iso)
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
ext1
dsimp [isoRestrict, isoOfSheafedSpaceIso]
apply SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_injective
rw [Functor.map_comp, SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_preimage]
exact SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f.1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
simp only [← isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f.1 i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f.1 U
attribute [elementwise nosimp] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
| op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 1,217 | 1,237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
/-!
# Cardinal of sigma-algebras
If a sigma-algebra is generated by a set of sets `s`, then the cardinality of the sigma-algebra is
bounded by `(max #s 2) ^ ℵ₀`. This is stated in `MeasurableSpace.cardinal_generate_measurable_le`
and `MeasurableSpace.cardinalMeasurableSet_le`.
In particular, if `#s ≤ 𝔠`, then the generated sigma-algebra has cardinality at most `𝔠`, see
`MeasurableSpace.cardinal_measurableSet_le_continuum`.
For the proof, we rely on an explicit inductive construction of the sigma-algebra generated by
`s` (instead of the inductive predicate `GenerateMeasurable`). This transfinite inductive
construction is parameterized by an ordinal `< ω₁`, and the cardinality bound is preserved along
each step of the construction. We show in `MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurable_eq_rec` that this
indeed generates this sigma-algebra.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u}
open Cardinal Ordinal Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
/-- Transfinite induction construction of the sigma-algebra generated by a set of sets `s`. At each
step, we add all elements of `s`, the empty set, the complements of already constructed sets, and
countable unions of already constructed sets.
We index this construction by an arbitrary ordinal for simplicity, but by `ω₁` we will have
generated all the sets in the sigma-algebra.
This construction is very similar to that of the Borel hierarchy. -/
def generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) : Set (Set α) :=
let S := ⋃ j < i, generateMeasurableRec s j
s ∪ {∅} ∪ compl '' S ∪ Set.range fun f : ℕ → S => ⋃ n, (f n).1
termination_by i
theorem self_subset_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
s ⊆ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
apply_rules [subset_union_of_subset_left]
exact subset_rfl
theorem empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
∅ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ (mem_singleton ∅)))
theorem compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i j : Ordinal} (h : j < i) {t : Set α}
(ht : t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) : tᶜ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ ⟨t, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, h, ht⟩, rfl⟩)
theorem iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i : Ordinal} {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf : ∀ n, ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) :
⋃ n, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_right _ ⟨fun n => ⟨f n, let ⟨j, hj, hf⟩ := hf n; mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, hj, hf⟩⟩, rfl⟩
theorem generateMeasurableRec_mono (s : Set (Set α)) : Monotone (generateMeasurableRec s) := by
intro i j h x hx
rcases h.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
· exact hx
· convert iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec fun _ => ⟨i, h, hx⟩
exact (iUnion_const x).symm
/-- An inductive principle for the elements of `generateMeasurableRec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
| theorem generateMeasurableRec_induction {s : Set (Set α)} {i : Ordinal} {t : Set α}
{p : Set α → Prop} (hs : ∀ t ∈ s, p t) (h0 : p ∅)
(hc : ∀ u, p u → (∃ j < i, u ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) → p uᶜ)
(hn : ∀ f : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, p (f n) ∧ ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) → p (⋃ n, f n)) :
t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i → p t := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Card.lean | 81 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,374 | 2,379 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Kevin Klinge, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.DistribMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
/-!
# Localization over left Ore sets.
This file proves results on the localization of rings (monoids with zeros) over a left Ore set.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization>
* [Zoran Škoda, *Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry*][skoda2006]
## Tags
localization, Ore, non-commutative
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u
open OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
section MonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv' (s : S) : (0 : R) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp [Submonoid.smul_def]⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
zero_mul x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_mul_char 0 r 1 s 0 1 (by simp), zero_mul, one_mul]
mul_zero x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, mul_div_one, mul_zero, zero_oreDiv', zero_oreDiv']
end MonoidWithZero
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
instance : CommMonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid R[S⁻¹])
end CommMonoidWithZero
section DistribMulAction
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S] {X : Type*} [AddMonoid X]
variable [DistribMulAction R X]
private def add'' (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
(oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₁ + oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₂) /ₒ (oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ * s₁)
private theorem add''_char (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(hb : sb * s₁ = rb * s₂) (h : sb * s₁ ∈ S) :
add'' r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = (sb • r₁ + rb • r₂) /ₒ ⟨sb * s₁, h⟩ := by
simp only [add'']
have ha := ore_eq (s₁ : R) s₂
generalize oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ = ra at *
generalize oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ = sa at *
rw [oreDiv_eq_iff]
rcases oreCondition sb sa with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
have : sc * rb * s₂ = rc * ra * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc rc, ← ha, ← mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hb]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ s₂ this with ⟨sd, hd⟩
use sd * sc
use sd * rc
simp only [smul_add, smul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul]
constructor
· rw [mul_assoc _ _ rb, hd, mul_assoc, hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (sc : R), hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
attribute [local instance] OreLocalization.oreEqv
private def add' (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
(--plus tilde
Quotient.lift
fun r₁s₁ : X × S => add'' r₁s₁.1 r₁s₁.2 r₂ s₂) <| by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` & `noncomm_ring` were not ported yet
rintro ⟨r₁', s₁'⟩ ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
-- s*, r*
rcases oreCondition (s₁' : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
--s~~, r~~
rcases oreCondition rb sc with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
-- s#, r#
dsimp at *
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₁').2]
have : sd * sb * s₁ = rd * rc * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc, hb', ← mul_assoc, hd, mul_assoc, hc, ← mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ (rd * rc : R) (sd * sb) this (sd * sb * s₁).2]
rw [mul_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def sb, hb, smul_smul, hd, oreDiv_eq_iff]
use 1
use rd
simp only [mul_smul, smul_add, one_smul, OneMemClass.coe_one, one_mul, true_and]
rw [this, hc, mul_assoc]
/-- The addition on the Ore localization. -/
@[irreducible]
private def add : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := fun x =>
Quotient.lift (fun rs : X × S => add' rs.1 rs.2 x)
(by
rintro ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
induction' x with r₃ s₃
show add'' _ _ _ _ = add'' _ _ _ _
dsimp only at *
rcases oreCondition (s₃ : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
rcases oreCondition rc sb with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
have : rd * rb * s₁ = sd * sc * s₃ := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← hb', ← mul_assoc, ← hd, mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₃).2]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ _ _ this.symm (sd * sc * s₃).2]
refine oreDiv_eq_iff.mpr ?_
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, smul_add]
use sd, 1
simp only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_smul, ← hb, Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_assoc, and_true]
simp only [smul_smul, hd])
instance : Add X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨add⟩
theorem oreDiv_add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s s' : S} :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' =
(oreDenom (s : R) s' • r + oreNum (s : R) s' • r') /ₒ (oreDenom (s : R) s' * s) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
theorem oreDiv_add_char' {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(h : sb * s = rb * s') (h' : sb * s ∈ S) :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ ⟨sb * s, h'⟩ := by
with_unfolding_all exact add''_char r s r' s' rb sb h h'
/-- A characterization of the addition on the Ore localizaion, allowing for arbitrary Ore
numerator and Ore denominator. -/
theorem oreDiv_add_char {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : S) (h : sb * s = rb * s') :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ (sb * s) :=
oreDiv_add_char' s s' rb sb h (sb * s).2
/-- Another characterization of the addition on the Ore localization, bundling up all witnesses
and conditions into a sigma type. -/
def oreDivAddChar' (r r' : X) (s s' : S) :
Σ'r'' : R,
Σ's'' : S, s'' * s = r'' * s' ∧ r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (s'' • r + r'' • r') /ₒ (s'' * s) :=
⟨oreNum (s : R) s', oreDenom (s : R) s', ore_eq (s : R) s', oreDiv_add_oreDiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s : S} : r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s = (r + r') /ₒ s := by
simp [oreDiv_add_char s s 1 1 (by simp)]
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'
rcases oreDivAddChar' (sa • r₁ + ra • r₂) r₃ (sa * s₁) s₃ with ⟨rc, sc, hc, q⟩; rw [q]; clear q
simp only [smul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
simp_rw [← add_oreDiv, ← OreLocalization.expand']
congr 2
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (ha.symm ▸ (sa * s₁).2)]; congr; ext; exact ha
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₃ s₃ rc (hc.symm ▸ (sc * (sa * s₁)).2)]; congr; ext; exact hc
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv (s : S) : (0 : X) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp⟩
protected theorem zero_add (x : X[S⁻¹]) : 0 + x = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
protected theorem add_zero (x : X[S⁻¹]) : x + 0 = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
@[irreducible]
private def nsmul : ℕ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := nsmulRec
instance : AddMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_assoc := OreLocalization.add_assoc
zero_add := OreLocalization.zero_add
add_zero := OreLocalization.add_zero
nsmul := nsmul
nsmul_zero _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
nsmul_succ _ _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem smul_zero (x : R[S⁻¹]) : x • (0 : X[S⁻¹]) = 0 := by
induction' x with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, smul_div_one, smul_zero, zero_oreDiv, zero_oreDiv]
protected theorem smul_add (z : R[S⁻¹]) (x y : X[S⁻¹]) :
z • (x + y) = z • x + z • y := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'; norm_cast at ha
rw [OreLocalization.expand' r₁ s₁ sa]
rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (by rw [← ha]; apply SetLike.coe_mem)]
rw [← Subtype.coe_eq_of_eq_mk ha]
repeat rw [oreDiv_smul_oreDiv]
simp only [smul_add, add_oreDiv]
instance : DistribMulAction R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero := OreLocalization.smul_zero
smul_add := OreLocalization.smul_add
instance {R₀} [Monoid R₀] [MulAction R₀ X] [MulAction R₀ R]
[IsScalarTower R₀ R X] [IsScalarTower R₀ R R] :
DistribMulAction R₀ X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero _ := by rw [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_zero]
smul_add _ _ _ := by simp only [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_add]
end DistribMulAction
section AddCommMonoid
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommMonoid X] [DistribMulAction R X]
protected theorem add_comm (x y : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y = y + x := by
induction' x with r s
induction' y with r' s'
rcases oreDivAddChar' r r' s s' with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩
rw [ha', oreDiv_add_char' s' s _ _ ha.symm (ha ▸ (sa * s).2), add_comm]
congr; ext; exact ha
instance instAddCommMonoidOreLocalization : AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_comm := OreLocalization.add_comm
end AddCommMonoid
section AddGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
/-- Negation on the Ore localization is defined via negation on the numerator. -/
@[irreducible]
protected def neg : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand (fun (r : X) (s : S) => -r /ₒ s) fun r t s ht => by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [← smul_neg, ← OreLocalization.expand]
instance instNegOreLocalization : Neg X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.neg⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem neg_def (r : X) (s : S) : -(r /ₒ s) = -r /ₒ s := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem neg_add_cancel (x : X[S⁻¹]) : -x + x = 0 := by
induction' x with r s; simp
/-- `zsmul` of `OreLocalization` -/
@[irreducible]
protected def zsmul : ℤ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := zsmulRec
unseal OreLocalization.zsmul in
instance instAddGroupOreLocalization : AddGroup X[S⁻¹] where
neg_add_cancel := OreLocalization.neg_add_cancel
zsmul := OreLocalization.zsmul
end AddGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
instance : AddCommGroup X[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddGroup X[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹])
end AddCommGroup
end OreLocalization
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OreLocalization/Basic.lean | 442 | 443 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
/-!
# Lists with no duplicates
`List.Nodup` is defined in `Data/List/Basic`. In this file we prove various properties of this
predicate.
-/
universe u v
open Function
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α}
namespace List
protected theorem Pairwise.nodup {l : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] (h : Pairwise r l) :
Nodup l :=
h.imp ne_of_irrefl
open scoped Relator in
theorem rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : Relator.BiUnique r) : (Forall₂ r ⇒ (· ↔ ·)) Nodup Nodup
| _, _, Forall₂.nil => by simp only [nodup_nil]
| _, _, Forall₂.cons hab h => by
simpa only [nodup_cons] using
Relator.rel_and (Relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h)) (rel_nodup hr h)
protected theorem Nodup.cons (ha : a ∉ l) (hl : Nodup l) : Nodup (a :: l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨ha, hl⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : Nodup [a] :=
pairwise_singleton _ _
theorem Nodup.of_cons (h : Nodup (a :: l)) : Nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem Nodup.not_mem (h : (a :: l).Nodup) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem : a ∈ l → ¬Nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 Nodup.not_mem
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬Nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬[a, a] <+ l :=
⟨fun d a h => not_nodup_pair a (d.sublist h),
by
induction l <;> intro h; · exact nodup_nil
case cons a l IH =>
exact (IH fun a s => h a <| sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s).cons
fun al => h a <| (singleton_sublist.2 al).cons_cons _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_mergeSort {l : List α} {le : α → α → Bool} : (l.mergeSort le).Nodup ↔ l.Nodup :=
(mergeSort_perm l le).nodup_iff
protected alias ⟨_, Nodup.mergeSort⟩ := nodup_mergeSort
theorem nodup_iff_injective_getElem {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ Function.Injective (fun i : Fin l.length => l[i.1]) :=
pairwise_iff_getElem.trans
⟨fun h i j hg => by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := i; obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := j
rcases lt_trichotomy i j with (hij | rfl | hji)
· exact (h i j hi hj hij hg).elim
· rfl
· exact (h j i hj hi hji hg.symm).elim,
fun hinj i j hi hj hij h => Nat.ne_of_lt hij (Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hinj ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h))⟩
theorem nodup_iff_injective_get {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ Function.Injective l.get := by
rw [nodup_iff_injective_getElem]
change _ ↔ Injective (fun i => l.get i)
simp
theorem Nodup.get_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) {i j : Fin l.length} :
l.get i = l.get j ↔ i = j :=
(nodup_iff_injective_get.1 h).eq_iff
theorem Nodup.getElem_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l)
{i : Nat} {hi : i < l.length} {j : Nat} {hj : j < l.length} :
l[i] = l[j] ↔ i = j := by
have := @Nodup.get_inj_iff _ _ h ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
simpa
theorem nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem? {l : List α} :
l.Nodup ↔ ∀ i j : ℕ, i < j → j < l.length → l[i]? ≠ l[j]? := by
rw [Nodup, pairwise_iff_getElem]
constructor
· intro h i j hij hj
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem (lt_trans hij hj), getElem?_eq_getElem hj, Ne, Option.some_inj]
exact h _ _ (by omega) hj hij
· intro h i j hi hj hij
rw [Ne, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem]
exact h i j hij hj
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem? (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem nodup_iff_get?_ne_get? {l : List α} :
l.Nodup ↔ ∀ i j : ℕ, i < j → j < l.length → l.get? i ≠ l.get? j := by
simp [nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem?]
theorem Nodup.ne_singleton_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) (x : α) :
l ≠ [x] ↔ l = [] ∨ ∃ y ∈ l, y ≠ x := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
specialize hl h.of_cons
by_cases hx : tl = [x]
· simpa [hx, and_comm, and_or_left] using h
· rw [← Ne, hl] at hx
rcases hx with (rfl | ⟨y, hy, hx⟩)
· simp
· suffices ∃ y ∈ hd :: tl, y ≠ x by simpa [ne_nil_of_mem hy]
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem _ hy, hx⟩
theorem not_nodup_of_get_eq_of_ne (xs : List α) (n m : Fin xs.length)
(h : xs.get n = xs.get m) (hne : n ≠ m) : ¬Nodup xs := by
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get]
exact fun hinj => hne (hinj h)
theorem idxOf_getElem [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (H : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.length) :
idxOf l[i] l = i :=
suffices (⟨idxOf l[i] l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 (getElem_mem _)⟩ : Fin l.length) = ⟨i, h⟩
from Fin.val_eq_of_eq this
nodup_iff_injective_get.1 H (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_getElem := idxOf_getElem
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `idxOf_get`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem get_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (H : Nodup l) (i : Fin l.length) :
idxOf (get l i) l = i := by
simp [idxOf_getElem, H]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias get_indexOf := get_idxOf
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans <|
forall_congr' fun a =>
have : replicate 2 a <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l := (le_count_iff_replicate_sublist ..).symm
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
theorem nodup_iff_count_eq_one [DecidableEq α] : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, count a l = 1 :=
nodup_iff_count_le_one.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun H h => H.antisymm (count_pos_iff.mpr h),
fun H => if h : _ then (H h).le else (count_eq_zero.mpr h).trans_le (Nat.zero_le 1)⟩
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) :
count a l = 1 :=
_root_.le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (count_pos_iff.2 h))
theorem count_eq_of_nodup [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
count a l = if a ∈ l then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_eq_one_of_mem d h
· exact count_eq_zero_of_not_mem h
theorem Nodup.of_append_left : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem Nodup.of_append_right : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₂ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup l₁ ∧ Nodup l₂ ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (d : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem Nodup.append (d₁ : Nodup l₁) (d₂ : Nodup l₂) (dj : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_append_comm {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup (l₂ ++ l₁) := by
simp only [nodup_append, and_left_comm, disjoint_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) ↔ Nodup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) := by
simp only [nodup_append, not_or, and_left_comm, and_assoc, nodup_cons, mem_append,
disjoint_cons_right]
theorem Nodup.of_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} : Nodup (map f l) → Nodup l :=
(Pairwise.of_map f) fun _ _ => mt <| congr_arg f
theorem Nodup.map_on {f : α → β} (H : ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y) (d : Nodup l) :
(map f l).Nodup :=
Pairwise.map _ (fun a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e => n (H a ma b mb e)) (Pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem inj_on_of_nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup (map f l)) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → f x = f y → x = y := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [map, nodup_cons, mem_map, not_exists, not_and, ← Ne.eq_def] at d
simp only [mem_cons]
rintro _ (rfl | h₁) _ (rfl | h₂) h₃
· rfl
· apply (d.1 _ h₂ h₃.symm).elim
· apply (d.1 _ h₁ h₃).elim
· apply ih d.2 h₁ h₂ h₃
theorem nodup_map_iff_inj_on {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
Nodup (map f l) ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y :=
⟨inj_on_of_nodup_map, fun h => d.map_on h⟩
protected theorem Nodup.map {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup l → Nodup (map f l) :=
Nodup.map_on fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : List α} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup (map f l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨Nodup.of_map _, Nodup.map hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_attach {l : List α} : Nodup (attach l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨fun h => attach_map_subtype_val l ▸ h.map fun _ _ => Subtype.eq, fun h =>
Nodup.of_map Subtype.val ((attach_map_subtype_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
protected alias ⟨Nodup.of_attach, Nodup.attach⟩ := nodup_attach
theorem Nodup.pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l : List α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : Nodup l) : Nodup (pmap f l H) := by
rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]
exact h.attach.map fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h => by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h
theorem Nodup.filter (p : α → Bool) {l} : Nodup l → Nodup (filter p l) := by
simpa using Pairwise.filter p
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse {l : List α} : Nodup (reverse l) ↔ Nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans <| by simp only [Nodup, Ne, eq_comm]
lemma nodup_tail_reverse (l : List α) (h : l[0]? = l.getLast?) :
Nodup l.reverse.tail ↔ Nodup l.tail := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
by_cases hl : l = []
· aesop
· simp_all only [List.tail_reverse, List.nodup_reverse,
List.dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil hl, List.tail_cons]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.zero_lt_succ, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_zero,
Nat.add_one_sub_one, Nat.lt_add_one, Option.some.injEq, List.getElem_cons,
show l.length ≠ 0 by aesop, ↓reduceDIte, getLast?_eq_getElem?] at h
rw [h,
show l.Nodup = (l.dropLast ++ [l.getLast hl]).Nodup by
simp [List.dropLast_eq_take],
List.nodup_append_comm]
simp [List.getLast_eq_getElem]
theorem Nodup.erase_getElem [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup)
(i : Nat) (h : i < l.length) : l.erase l[i] = l.eraseIdx ↑i := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
rw [nodup_cons] at hl
rw [erase_cons_tail]
· simp [IH hl.2]
· rw [beq_iff_eq]
simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right] at h
exact mt (· ▸ getElem_mem h) hl.1
theorem Nodup.erase_get [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.erase (l.get i) = l.eraseIdx ↑i := by
simp [erase_getElem, hl]
theorem Nodup.diff [DecidableEq α] : l₁.Nodup → (l₁.diff l₂).Nodup :=
Nodup.sublist <| diff_sublist _ _
theorem nodup_flatten {L : List (List α)} :
Nodup (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, Nodup l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint L := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_flatten, disjoint_left.symm, forall_mem_ne]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-10-15")] alias nodup_join := nodup_flatten
theorem nodup_flatMap {l₁ : List α} {f : α → List β} :
Nodup (l₁.flatMap f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, Nodup (f x)) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on f) l₁ := by
simp only [List.flatMap, nodup_flatten, pairwise_map, and_comm, and_left_comm, mem_map,
exists_imp, and_imp]
rw [show (∀ (l : List β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → Nodup l) ↔ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l₁ → Nodup (f x)
from forall_swap.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_eq']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-10-16")] alias nodup_bind := nodup_flatMap
protected theorem Nodup.product {l₂ : List β} (d₁ : l₁.Nodup) (d₂ : l₂.Nodup) :
(l₁ ×ˢ l₂).Nodup :=
nodup_flatMap.2
⟨fun a _ => d₂.map <| LeftInverse.injective fun b => (rfl : (a, b).2 = b),
d₁.imp fun {a₁ a₂} n x h₁ h₂ => by
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, _, rfl⟩
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩
exact n rfl⟩
theorem Nodup.sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₂ : ∀ a, List (σ a)} (d₁ : Nodup l₁)
(d₂ : ∀ a, Nodup (l₂ a)) : (l₁.sigma l₂).Nodup :=
nodup_flatMap.2
⟨fun a _ => (d₂ a).map fun b b' h => by injection h with _ h,
d₁.imp fun {a₁ a₂} n x h₁ h₂ => by
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, _, rfl⟩
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩
exact n rfl⟩
protected theorem Nodup.filterMap {f : α → Option β} (h : ∀ a a' b, b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
Nodup l → Nodup (filterMap f l) :=
(Pairwise.filterMap f) @fun a a' n b bm b' bm' e => n <| h a a' b' (by rw [← e]; exact bm) bm'
protected theorem Nodup.concat (h : a ∉ l) (h' : l.Nodup) : (l.concat a).Nodup := by
rw [concat_eq_append]; exact h'.append (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
protected theorem Nodup.insert [DecidableEq α] (h : l.Nodup) : (l.insert a).Nodup :=
if h' : a ∈ l then by rw [insert_of_mem h']; exact h
else by rw [insert_of_not_mem h', nodup_cons]; constructor <;> assumption
theorem Nodup.union [DecidableEq α] (l₁ : List α) (h : Nodup l₂) : (l₁ ∪ l₂).Nodup := by
induction l₁ generalizing l₂ with
| nil => exact h
| cons a l₁ ih => exact (ih h).insert
theorem Nodup.inter [DecidableEq α] (l₂ : List α) : Nodup l₁ → Nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
Nodup.filter _
theorem Nodup.diff_eq_filter [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁.Nodup), l₁.diff l₂ = l₁.filter (· ∉ l₂)
| l₁, [], _ => by simp
| l₁, a :: l₂, hl₁ => by
rw [diff_cons, (hl₁.erase _).diff_eq_filter, hl₁.erase_eq_filter, filter_filter]
simp only [decide_not, bne, Bool.and_comm, mem_cons, not_or, decide_mem_cons, Bool.not_or]
theorem Nodup.mem_diff_iff [DecidableEq α] (hl₁ : l₁.Nodup) : a ∈ l₁.diff l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∉ l₂ := by
rw [hl₁.diff_eq_filter, mem_filter, decide_eq_true_iff]
protected theorem Nodup.set :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {a : α} (_ : l.Nodup) (_ : a ∉ l), (l.set n a).Nodup
| [], _, _, _, _ => nodup_nil
| _ :: _, 0, _, hl, ha => nodup_cons.2 ⟨mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha, (nodup_cons.1 hl).2⟩
| _ :: _, _ + 1, _, hl, ha =>
nodup_cons.2
⟨fun h =>
(mem_or_eq_of_mem_set h).elim (nodup_cons.1 hl).1 fun hba => ha (hba ▸ mem_cons_self),
hl.of_cons.set (mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha)⟩
theorem Nodup.map_update [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (f : α → β) (x : α) (y : β) :
l.map (Function.update f x y) =
if x ∈ l then (l.map f).set (l.idxOf x) y else l.map f := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons hd tl ihl => ?_
rw [nodup_cons] at hl
simp only [mem_cons, map, ihl hl.2]
by_cases H : hd = x
· subst hd
simp [set, hl.1]
· simp [Ne.symm H, H, set, ← apply_ite (cons (f hd))]
theorem Nodup.pairwise_of_forall_ne {l : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} (hl : l.Nodup)
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, a ≠ b → r a b) : l.Pairwise r := by
rw [pairwise_iff_forall_sublist]
intro a b hab
if heq : a = b then
cases heq; have := nodup_iff_sublist.mp hl _ hab; contradiction
else
apply h <;> try (apply hab.subset; simp)
exact heq
theorem Nodup.take_eq_filter_mem [DecidableEq α] :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (_ : l.Nodup), l.take n = l.filter (l.take n).elem
| [], n, _ => by simp
| b::l, 0, _ => by simp
| b::l, n+1, hl => by
rw [take_succ_cons, Nodup.take_eq_filter_mem (Nodup.of_cons hl), filter_cons_of_pos (by simp)]
congr 1
refine List.filter_congr ?_
intro x hx
have : x ≠ b := fun h => (nodup_cons.1 hl).1 (h ▸ hx)
simp +contextual [List.mem_filter, this, hx]
end List
theorem Option.toList_nodup : ∀ o : Option α, o.toList.Nodup
| none => List.nodup_nil
| some x => List.nodup_singleton x
| Mathlib/Data/List/Nodup.lean | 444 | 453 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[f i] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min_const hτ]; apply MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_inf
theorem measurableSet_inter_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π)
(s : Set Ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet] at hs ⊢
intro i
have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} =
s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} ∩
{ω | min (τ ω) i ≤ min (min (τ ω) (π ω)) i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [min_le_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff, le_refl, true_and,
true_or]
by_cases hτi : τ ω ≤ i
· simp only [hτi, true_or, and_true, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor <;> intro h
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases h with h | h
· exact h
· exact hτi.trans h
simp only [hτi, false_or, and_false, false_and, iff_false, not_and, not_le, and_imp]
refine fun _ hτ_le_π => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hτ_le_π
rw [← not_le]
exact hτi
rw [this]
refine ((hs i).inter ((hτ.min hπ) i)).inter ?_
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f i) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact ((hτ.min hπ).min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_iff [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self]
rw [this]
exact measurableSet_inter_le _ hπ _ h
· rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at h
exact h.1
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_min_iff hτ (isStoppingTime_const _ i),
IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_const, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩, fun h j => h.1 j⟩
specialize h i
rwa [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self] at h
theorem measurableSet_le_stopping_time [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω | min (τ ω) j ≤ min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, min_le_iff, le_min_iff, le_refl,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
simp only [h, or_self_iff, and_true]
rw [Iff.comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact h.trans
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f j) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_stopping_time_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
suffices MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} by
rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at this; exact this.2
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}, ← hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_iff hπ, Set.univ_inter]
exact measurableSet_le_stopping_time hτ hπ
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time [AddGroup ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[MeasurableSub₂ ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hσ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hσ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
| refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time_of_countable [Countable ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 650 | 661 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ZMultiples
/-!
# The action of the modular group SL(2, ℤ) on the upper half-plane
We define the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ` (via restriction of the `SL(2,ℝ)` action in
`Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane`). We then define the standard fundamental domain
(`ModularGroup.fd`, `𝒟`) for this action and show
(`ModularGroup.exists_smul_mem_fd`) that any point in `ℍ` can be
moved inside `𝒟`.
## Main definitions
The standard (closed) fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟`:
`fd := {z | 1 ≤ (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
The standard open fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟ᵒ`:
`fdo := {z | 1 < (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| < (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
These notations are localized in the `Modular` locale and can be enabled via `open scoped Modular`.
## Main results
Any `z : ℍ` can be moved to `𝒟` by an element of `SL(2,ℤ)`:
`exists_smul_mem_fd (z : ℍ) : ∃ g : SL(2,ℤ), g • z ∈ 𝒟`
If both `z` and `γ • z` are in the open domain `𝒟ᵒ` then `z = γ • z`:
`eq_smul_self_of_mem_fdo_mem_fdo {z : ℍ} {g : SL(2,ℤ)} (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : z = g • z`
# Discussion
Standard proofs make use of the identity
`g • z = a / c - 1 / (c (cz + d))`
for `g = [[a, b], [c, d]]` in `SL(2)`, but this requires separate handling of whether `c = 0`.
Instead, our proof makes use of the following perhaps novel identity (see
`ModularGroup.smul_eq_lcRow0_add`):
`g • z = (a c + b d) / (c^2 + d^2) + (d z - c) / ((c^2 + d^2) (c z + d))`
where there is no issue of division by zero.
Another feature is that we delay until the very end the consideration of special matrices
`T=[[1,1],[0,1]]` (see `ModularGroup.T`) and `S=[[0,-1],[1,0]]` (see `ModularGroup.S`), by
instead using abstract theory on the properness of certain maps (phrased in terms of the filters
`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, etc) to deduce existence theorems, first to prove the
existence of `g` maximizing `(g•z).im` (see `ModularGroup.exists_max_im`), and then among
those, to minimize `|(g•z).re|` (see `ModularGroup.exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re`).
-/
open Complex hiding abs_two
open Matrix hiding mul_smul
open Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup UpperHalfPlane ModularGroup Topology
noncomputable section
open scoped ComplexConjugate MatrixGroups
namespace ModularGroup
variable {g : SL(2, ℤ)} (z : ℍ)
section BottomRow
/-- The two numbers `c`, `d` in the "bottom_row" of `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]` in `SL(2, ℤ)` are coprime. -/
theorem bottom_row_coprime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (g : SL(2, R)) :
IsCoprime ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 0) ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 1) := by
use -(↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 1, (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 0
rw [add_comm, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← det_fin_two]
exact g.det_coe
/-- Every pair `![c, d]` of coprime integers is the "bottom_row" of some element `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]`
of `SL(2,ℤ)`. -/
theorem bottom_row_surj {R : Type*} [CommRing R] :
Set.SurjOn (fun g : SL(2, R) => (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1) Set.univ
{cd | IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)} := by
rintro cd ⟨b₀, a, gcd_eqn⟩
let A := of ![![a, -b₀], cd]
have det_A_1 : det A = 1 := by
convert gcd_eqn
rw [det_fin_two]
simp [A, (by ring : a * cd 1 + b₀ * cd 0 = b₀ * cd 0 + a * cd 1)]
refine ⟨⟨A, det_A_1⟩, Set.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
ext; simp [A]
end BottomRow
section TendstoLemmas
open Filter ContinuousLinearMap
attribute [local simp] ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul
/-- The function `(c,d) → |cz+d|^2` is proper, that is, preimages of bounded-above sets are finite.
-/
theorem tendsto_normSq_coprime_pair :
Filter.Tendsto (fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => normSq ((p 0 : ℂ) * z + p 1)) cofinite atTop := by
-- using this instance rather than the automatic `Function.module` makes unification issues in
-- `LinearEquiv.isClosedEmbedding_of_injective` less bad later in the proof.
letI : Module ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ) := NormedSpace.toModule
let π₀ : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := LinearMap.proj 0
let π₁ : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := LinearMap.proj 1
let f : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ := π₀.smulRight (z : ℂ) + π₁.smulRight 1
have f_def : ⇑f = fun p : Fin 2 → ℝ => (p 0 : ℂ) * ↑z + p 1 := by
ext1
dsimp only [π₀, π₁, f, LinearMap.coe_proj, real_smul, LinearMap.coe_smulRight,
LinearMap.add_apply]
rw [mul_one]
have :
(fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => normSq ((p 0 : ℂ) * ↑z + ↑(p 1))) =
normSq ∘ f ∘ fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p := by
ext1
rw [f_def]
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
rw [ofReal_intCast, ofReal_intCast]
rw [this]
have hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥ := by
let g : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] Fin 2 → ℝ :=
LinearMap.pi ![imLm, imLm.comp ((z : ℂ) • ((conjAe : ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] ℂ) : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ))]
suffices ((z : ℂ).im⁻¹ • g).comp f = LinearMap.id by exact LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_inverse this
apply LinearMap.ext
intro c
have hz : (z : ℂ).im ≠ 0 := z.2.ne'
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.id_apply]
ext i
dsimp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.pi_apply, smul_eq_mul]
fin_cases i
· show (z : ℂ).im⁻¹ * (f c).im = c 0
rw [f_def, add_im, im_ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, add_zero, mul_left_comm, inv_mul_cancel₀ hz,
mul_one]
· show (z : ℂ).im⁻¹ * ((z : ℂ) * conj (f c)).im = c 1
rw [f_def, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, mul_add, mul_left_comm, mul_conj, conj_ofReal,
conj_ofReal, ← ofReal_mul, add_im, ofReal_im, zero_add, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ hz]
simp only [ofReal_im, ofReal_re, mul_im, zero_add, mul_zero]
have hf' : IsClosedEmbedding f := f.isClosedEmbedding_of_injective hf
have h₂ : Tendsto (fun p : Fin 2 → ℤ => ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p) cofinite (cocompact _) := by
convert Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ => Int.tendsto_coe_cofinite
· rw [coprodᵢ_cofinite]
· rw [coprodᵢ_cocompact]
exact tendsto_normSq_cocompact_atTop.comp (hf'.tendsto_cocompact.comp h₂)
/-- Given `coprime_pair` `p=(c,d)`, the matrix `[[a,b],[*,*]]` is sent to `a*c+b*d`.
This is the linear map version of this operation.
-/
def lcRow0 (p : Fin 2 → ℤ) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
((p 0 : ℝ) • LinearMap.proj (0 : Fin 2) +
(p 1 : ℝ) • LinearMap.proj (1 : Fin 2) : (Fin 2 → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ).comp
(LinearMap.proj 0)
@[simp]
theorem lcRow0_apply (p : Fin 2 → ℤ) (g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ) :
lcRow0 p g = p 0 * g 0 0 + p 1 * g 0 1 :=
rfl
/-- Linear map sending the matrix [a, b; c, d] to the matrix [ac₀ + bd₀, - ad₀ + bc₀; c, d], for
some fixed `(c₀, d₀)`. -/
@[simps!]
def lcRow0Extend {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ :=
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight
![by
refine
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.generalLinearEquiv ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ)
(GeneralLinearGroup.toLin (planeConformalMatrix (cd 0 : ℝ) (-(cd 1 : ℝ)) ?_))
norm_cast
rw [neg_sq]
exact hcd.sq_add_sq_ne_zero, LinearEquiv.refl ℝ (Fin 2 → ℝ)]
/-- The map `lcRow0` is proper, that is, preimages of cocompact sets are finite in
`[[* , *], [c, d]]`. -/
theorem tendsto_lcRow0 {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
Tendsto (fun g : { g : SL(2, ℤ) // g 1 = cd } => lcRow0 cd ↑(↑g : SL(2, ℝ))) cofinite
(cocompact ℝ) := by
let mB : ℝ → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ := fun t => of ![![t, (-(1 : ℤ) : ℝ)], (↑) ∘ cd]
have hmB : Continuous mB := by
refine continuous_matrix ?_
simp only [mB, Fin.forall_fin_two, continuous_const, continuous_id', of_apply, cons_val_zero,
cons_val_one, and_self_iff]
refine Filter.Tendsto.of_tendsto_comp ?_ (comap_cocompact_le hmB)
let f₁ : SL(2, ℤ) → Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℝ := fun g =>
Matrix.map (↑g : Matrix _ _ ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ)
have cocompact_ℝ_to_cofinite_ℤ_matrix :
Tendsto (fun m : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ => Matrix.map m ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ)) cofinite
(cocompact _) := by
simpa only [coprodᵢ_cofinite, coprodᵢ_cocompact] using
Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ : Fin 2 =>
Tendsto.pi_map_coprodᵢ fun _ : Fin 2 => Int.tendsto_coe_cofinite
have hf₁ : Tendsto f₁ cofinite (cocompact _) :=
cocompact_ℝ_to_cofinite_ℤ_matrix.comp Subtype.coe_injective.tendsto_cofinite
have hf₂ : IsClosedEmbedding (lcRow0Extend hcd) :=
(lcRow0Extend hcd).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.isClosedEmbedding
convert hf₂.tendsto_cocompact.comp (hf₁.comp Subtype.coe_injective.tendsto_cofinite) using 1
ext ⟨g, rfl⟩ i j : 3
fin_cases i <;> [fin_cases j; skip]
-- the following are proved by `simp`, but it is replaced by `simp only` to avoid timeouts.
· simp only [Fin.isValue, Int.cast_one, map_apply_coe, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply,
Int.coe_castRingHom, lcRow0_apply, map_apply, Fin.zero_eta, id_eq, Function.comp_apply,
of_apply, cons_val', cons_val_zero, empty_val', cons_val_fin_one, lcRow0Extend_apply,
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.coeFn_generalLinearEquiv, GeneralLinearGroup.coe_toLin,
val_planeConformalMatrix, neg_neg, mulVecLin_apply, mulVec, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_two,
cons_val_one, head_cons, mB, f₁]
· convert congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (-n : ℝ)) g.det_coe.symm using 1
simp only [Fin.zero_eta, id_eq, Function.comp_apply, lcRow0Extend_apply, cons_val_zero,
LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.coeFn_generalLinearEquiv, GeneralLinearGroup.coe_toLin,
mulVecLin_apply, mulVec, dotProduct, det_fin_two, f₁]
simp only [Fin.isValue, Fin.mk_one, val_planeConformalMatrix, neg_neg, of_apply, cons_val',
empty_val', cons_val_fin_one, cons_val_one, head_fin_const, map_apply, Fin.sum_univ_two,
cons_val_zero, neg_mul, head_cons, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_mul, neg_sub]
ring
· rfl
/-- This replaces `(g•z).re = a/c + *` in the standard theory with the following novel identity:
`g • z = (a c + b d) / (c^2 + d^2) + (d z - c) / ((c^2 + d^2) (c z + d))`
which does not need to be decomposed depending on whether `c = 0`. -/
theorem smul_eq_lcRow0_add {p : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hp : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) (hg : g 1 = p) :
↑(g • z) =
(lcRow0 p ↑(g : SL(2, ℝ)) : ℂ) / ((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) +
((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1)) := by
have nonZ1 : (p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2 ≠ 0 := mod_cast hp.sq_add_sq_ne_zero
have : ((↑) : ℤ → ℝ) ∘ p ≠ 0 := fun h => hp.ne_zero (by ext i; simpa using congr_fun h i)
have nonZ2 : (p 0 : ℂ) * z + p 1 ≠ 0 := by simpa using linear_ne_zero _ z this
field_simp [nonZ1, nonZ2, denom_ne_zero, num]
rw [(by simp :
(p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0 = (p 1 * z - p 0) * ↑(Matrix.det (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ)))]
rw [← hg, det_fin_two]
simp only [Int.coe_castRingHom, coe_matrix_coe, Int.cast_mul, ofReal_intCast, map_apply, denom,
Int.cast_sub, coe_GLPos_coe_GL_coe_matrix, coe_apply_complex]
ring
theorem tendsto_abs_re_smul {p : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hp : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) :
Tendsto
(fun g : { g : SL(2, ℤ) // g 1 = p } => |((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re|) cofinite atTop := by
suffices
Tendsto (fun g : (fun g : SL(2, ℤ) => g 1) ⁻¹' {p} => ((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re) cofinite
(cocompact ℝ)
by exact tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop.comp this
have : ((p 0 : ℝ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ ≠ 0 := by
apply inv_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.sq_add_sq_ne_zero
let f := Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ this
let ff := Homeomorph.addRight
(((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1))).re
convert (f.trans ff).isClosedEmbedding.tendsto_cocompact.comp (tendsto_lcRow0 hp) with _ _ g
change
((g : SL(2, ℤ)) • z).re =
lcRow0 p ↑(↑g : SL(2, ℝ)) / ((p 0 : ℝ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℝ) ^ 2) +
Complex.re (((p 1 : ℂ) * z - p 0) / (((p 0 : ℂ) ^ 2 + (p 1 : ℂ) ^ 2) * (p 0 * z + p 1)))
exact mod_cast congr_arg Complex.re (smul_eq_lcRow0_add z hp g.2)
end TendstoLemmas
section FundamentalDomain
attribute [local simp] UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul re_smul
/-- For `z : ℍ`, there is a `g : SL(2,ℤ)` maximizing `(g•z).im` -/
theorem exists_max_im : ∃ g : SL(2, ℤ), ∀ g' : SL(2, ℤ), (g' • z).im ≤ (g • z).im := by
classical
let s : Set (Fin 2 → ℤ) := {cd | IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)}
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨![1, 1], isCoprime_one_left⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp_coprime, hp⟩ :=
Filter.Tendsto.exists_within_forall_le hs (tendsto_normSq_coprime_pair z)
obtain ⟨g, -, hg⟩ := bottom_row_surj hp_coprime
refine ⟨g, fun g' => ?_⟩
rw [ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq, ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq,
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left]
· simpa [← hg] using hp (g' 1) (bottom_row_coprime g')
· exact z.im_pos
· exact normSq_denom_pos g' z
· exact normSq_denom_pos g z
/-- Given `z : ℍ` and a bottom row `(c,d)`, among the `g : SL(2,ℤ)` with this bottom row, minimize
`|(g•z).re|`. -/
theorem exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re {cd : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hcd : IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)) :
∃ g : SL(2, ℤ), g 1 = cd ∧ ∀ g' : SL(2, ℤ), g 1 = g' 1 →
|(g • z).re| ≤ |(g' • z).re| := by
haveI : Nonempty { g : SL(2, ℤ) // g 1 = cd } :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := bottom_row_surj hcd
⟨⟨x, hx.2⟩⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := Filter.Tendsto.exists_forall_le (tendsto_abs_re_smul z hcd)
refine ⟨g, g.2, ?_⟩
intro g1 hg1
have : g1 ∈ (fun g : SL(2, ℤ) => g 1) ⁻¹' {cd} := by
rw [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
exact Eq.trans hg1.symm (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp (Set.mem_preimage.mp g.2))
exact hg ⟨g1, this⟩
theorem coe_T_zpow_smul_eq {n : ℤ} : (↑(T ^ n • z) : ℂ) = z + n := by
rw [sl_moeb, UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul]
simp [coe_T_zpow, denom, num, -map_zpow]
theorem re_T_zpow_smul (n : ℤ) : (T ^ n • z).re = z.re + n := by
rw [← coe_re, coe_T_zpow_smul_eq, add_re, intCast_re, coe_re]
theorem im_T_zpow_smul (n : ℤ) : (T ^ n • z).im = z.im := by
rw [← coe_im, coe_T_zpow_smul_eq, add_im, intCast_im, add_zero, coe_im]
theorem re_T_smul : (T • z).re = z.re + 1 := by simpa using re_T_zpow_smul z 1
theorem im_T_smul : (T • z).im = z.im := by simpa using im_T_zpow_smul z 1
theorem re_T_inv_smul : (T⁻¹ • z).re = z.re - 1 := by simpa using re_T_zpow_smul z (-1)
theorem im_T_inv_smul : (T⁻¹ • z).im = z.im := by simpa using im_T_zpow_smul z (-1)
variable {z}
-- If instead we had `g` and `T` of type `PSL(2, ℤ)`, then we could simply state `g = T^n`.
theorem exists_eq_T_zpow_of_c_eq_zero (hc : g 1 0 = 0) :
∃ n : ℤ, ∀ z : ℍ, g • z = T ^ n • z := by
have had := g.det_coe
replace had : g 0 0 * g 1 1 = 1 := by rw [det_fin_two, hc] at had; omega
rcases Int.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_mul_eq_one' had with (⟨ha, hd⟩ | ⟨ha, hd⟩)
· use g 0 1
suffices g = T ^ g 0 1 by intro z; conv_lhs => rw [this]
ext i j; fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;>
simp [ha, hc, hd, coe_T_zpow, show (1 : Fin (0 + 2)) = (1 : Fin 2) from rfl]
· use -(g 0 1)
suffices g = -T ^ (-(g 0 1)) by intro z; conv_lhs => rw [this, SL_neg_smul]
ext i j; fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;>
simp [ha, hc, hd, coe_T_zpow, show (1 : Fin (0 + 2)) = (1 : Fin 2) from rfl]
-- If `c = 1`, then `g` factorises into a product terms involving only `T` and `S`.
theorem g_eq_of_c_eq_one (hc : g 1 0 = 1) : g = T ^ g 0 0 * S * T ^ g 1 1 := by
have hg := g.det_coe.symm
replace hg : g 0 1 = g 0 0 * g 1 1 - 1 := by rw [det_fin_two, hc] at hg; omega
refine Subtype.ext ?_
conv_lhs => rw [(g : Matrix _ _ ℤ).eta_fin_two]
simp only [hg, sub_eq_add_neg, hc, coe_mul, coe_T_zpow, coe_S, mul_fin_two, mul_zero, mul_one,
zero_add, one_mul, add_zero, zero_mul]
/-- If `1 < |z|`, then `|S • z| < 1`. -/
theorem normSq_S_smul_lt_one (h : 1 < normSq z) : normSq ↑(S • z) < 1 := by
simpa [coe_S, num, denom] using (inv_lt_inv₀ z.normSq_pos zero_lt_one).mpr h
/-- If `|z| < 1`, then applying `S` strictly decreases `im`. -/
theorem im_lt_im_S_smul (h : normSq z < 1) : z.im < (S • z).im := by
have : z.im < z.im / normSq (z : ℂ) := by
have imz : 0 < z.im := im_pos z
apply (lt_div_iff₀ z.normSq_pos).mpr
nlinarith
convert this
simp only [ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq]
simp [denom, coe_S]
/-- The standard (closed) fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`. -/
def fd : Set ℍ :=
{z | 1 ≤ normSq (z : ℂ) ∧ |z.re| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 2}
/-- The standard open fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`. -/
def fdo : Set ℍ :=
{z | 1 < normSq (z : ℂ) ∧ |z.re| < (1 : ℝ) / 2}
@[inherit_doc ModularGroup.fd]
scoped[Modular] notation "𝒟" => ModularGroup.fd
@[inherit_doc ModularGroup.fdo]
scoped[Modular] notation "𝒟ᵒ" => ModularGroup.fdo
open scoped Modular
theorem abs_two_mul_re_lt_one_of_mem_fdo (h : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : |2 * z.re| < 1 := by
rw [abs_mul, abs_two, ← lt_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)]
exact h.2
theorem three_lt_four_mul_im_sq_of_mem_fdo (h : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : 3 < 4 * z.im ^ 2 := by
have : 1 < z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im := by simpa [Complex.normSq_apply] using h.1
have := h.2
cases abs_cases z.re <;> nlinarith
/-- non-strict variant of `ModularGroup.three_le_four_mul_im_sq_of_mem_fdo` -/
theorem three_le_four_mul_im_sq_of_mem_fd {τ : ℍ} (h : τ ∈ 𝒟) : 3 ≤ 4 * τ.im ^ 2 := by
have : 1 ≤ τ.re * τ.re + τ.im * τ.im := by simpa [Complex.normSq_apply] using h.1
cases abs_cases τ.re <;> nlinarith [h.2]
/-- If `z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ`, and `n : ℤ`, then `|z + n| > 1`. -/
theorem one_lt_normSq_T_zpow_smul (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (n : ℤ) : 1 < normSq (T ^ n • z : ℍ) := by
have hz₁ : 1 < z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im := hz.1
have hzn := Int.nneg_mul_add_sq_of_abs_le_one n (abs_two_mul_re_lt_one_of_mem_fdo hz).le
have : 1 < (z.re + ↑n) * (z.re + ↑n) + z.im * z.im := by linarith
simpa [coe_T_zpow, normSq, num, denom, -map_zpow]
theorem eq_zero_of_mem_fdo_of_T_zpow_mem_fdo {n : ℤ} (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : T ^ n • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) :
n = 0 := by
suffices |(n : ℝ)| < 1 by
rwa [← Int.cast_abs, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_lt, Int.abs_lt_one_iff] at this
have h₁ := hz.2
have h₂ := hg.2
rw [re_T_zpow_smul] at h₂
calc
|(n : ℝ)| ≤ |z.re| + |z.re + (n : ℝ)| := abs_add' (n : ℝ) z.re
_ < 1 / 2 + 1 / 2 := add_lt_add h₁ h₂
_ = 1 := add_halves 1
/-- First Fundamental Domain Lemma: Any `z : ℍ` can be moved to `𝒟` by an element of
`SL(2,ℤ)` -/
theorem exists_smul_mem_fd (z : ℍ) : ∃ g : SL(2, ℤ), g • z ∈ 𝒟 := by
-- obtain a g₀ which maximizes im (g • z),
obtain ⟨g₀, hg₀⟩ := exists_max_im z
-- then among those, minimize re
obtain ⟨g, hg, hg'⟩ := exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re z (bottom_row_coprime g₀)
refine ⟨g, ?_⟩
-- `g` has same max im property as `g₀`
have hg₀' : ∀ g' : SL(2, ℤ), (g' • z).im ≤ (g • z).im := by
have hg'' : (g • z).im = (g₀ • z).im := by
rw [ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq, ModularGroup.im_smul_eq_div_normSq,
denom_apply, denom_apply, hg]
simpa only [hg''] using hg₀
constructor
· -- Claim: `1 ≤ ⇑norm_sq ↑(g • z)`. If not, then `S•g•z` has larger imaginary part
contrapose! hg₀'
refine ⟨S * g, ?_⟩
rw [mul_smul]
exact im_lt_im_S_smul hg₀'
· show |(g • z).re| ≤ 1 / 2
-- if not, then either `T` or `T'` decrease |Re|.
rw [abs_le]
constructor
· contrapose! hg'
refine ⟨T * g, (T_mul_apply_one _).symm, ?_⟩
rw [mul_smul, re_T_smul]
cases abs_cases ((g • z).re + 1) <;> cases abs_cases (g • z).re <;> linarith
· contrapose! hg'
refine ⟨T⁻¹ * g, (T_inv_mul_apply_one _).symm, ?_⟩
rw [mul_smul, re_T_inv_smul]
cases abs_cases ((g • z).re - 1) <;> cases abs_cases (g • z).re <;> linarith
section UniqueRepresentative
/-- An auxiliary result en route to `ModularGroup.c_eq_zero`. -/
theorem abs_c_le_one (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : |g 1 0| ≤ 1 := by
let c' : ℤ := g 1 0
let c := (c' : ℝ)
suffices 3 * c ^ 2 < 4 by
rw [← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_three, ← Int.cast_four, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_lt] at this
replace this : c' ^ 2 ≤ 1 ^ 2 := by omega
rwa [sq_le_sq, abs_one] at this
suffices c ≠ 0 → 9 * c ^ 4 < 16 by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (hc | hc)
· rw [hc]; norm_num
· refine (abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' ?_ (by norm_num)).2
specialize this hc
linarith
intro hc
have h₁ : 3 * 3 * c ^ 4 < 4 * (g • z).im ^ 2 * (4 * z.im ^ 2) * c ^ 4 := by
gcongr <;> apply three_lt_four_mul_im_sq_of_mem_fdo <;> assumption
have h₂ : (c * z.im) ^ 4 / normSq (denom (↑g) z) ^ 2 ≤ 1 :=
div_le_one_of_le₀
(pow_four_le_pow_two_of_pow_two_le (z.c_mul_im_sq_le_normSq_denom g))
(sq_nonneg _)
let nsq := normSq (denom g z)
calc
9 * c ^ 4 < c ^ 4 * z.im ^ 2 * (g • z).im ^ 2 * 16 := by linarith
_ = c ^ 4 * z.im ^ 4 / nsq ^ 2 * 16 := by
rw [im_smul_eq_div_normSq, div_pow]
ring
_ ≤ 16 := by rw [← mul_pow]; linarith
/-- An auxiliary result en route to `ModularGroup.eq_smul_self_of_mem_fdo_mem_fdo`. -/
theorem c_eq_zero (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : g 1 0 = 0 := by
have hp : ∀ {g' : SL(2, ℤ)}, g' • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ → g' 1 0 ≠ 1 := by
intro g' hg'
by_contra hc
let a := g' 0 0
let d := g' 1 1
have had : T ^ (-a) * g' = S * T ^ d := by
rw [g_eq_of_c_eq_one hc]
dsimp [a, d]
group
let w := T ^ (-a) • g' • z
have h₁ : w = S • T ^ d • z := by simp only [w, ← mul_smul, had]
replace h₁ : normSq w < 1 := h₁.symm ▸ normSq_S_smul_lt_one (one_lt_normSq_T_zpow_smul hz d)
have h₂ : 1 < normSq w := one_lt_normSq_T_zpow_smul hg' (-a)
linarith
have hn : g 1 0 ≠ -1 := by
intro hc
replace hc : (-g) 1 0 = 1 := by simp [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr hc]
replace hg : -g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ := (SL_neg_smul g z).symm ▸ hg
exact hp hg hc
specialize hp hg
rcases Int.abs_le_one_iff.mp <| abs_c_le_one hz hg with ⟨⟩ <;> tauto
/-- Second Fundamental Domain Lemma: if both `z` and `g • z` are in the open domain `𝒟ᵒ`,
where `z : ℍ` and `g : SL(2,ℤ)`, then `z = g • z`. -/
theorem eq_smul_self_of_mem_fdo_mem_fdo (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : z = g • z := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_eq_T_zpow_of_c_eq_zero (c_eq_zero hz hg)
rw [hn] at hg ⊢
simp [eq_zero_of_mem_fdo_of_T_zpow_mem_fdo hz hg, one_smul]
end UniqueRepresentative
end FundamentalDomain
lemma exists_one_half_le_im_smul (τ : ℍ) : ∃ γ : SL(2, ℤ), 1 / 2 ≤ im (γ • τ) := by
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := exists_smul_mem_fd τ
use γ
nlinarith [three_le_four_mul_im_sq_of_mem_fd hγ, im_pos (γ • τ)]
|
/-- For every `τ : ℍ` there is some `γ ∈ SL(2, ℤ)` that sends it to an element whose
imaginary part is at least `1/2` and such that `denom γ τ` has norm at most 1. -/
lemma exists_one_half_le_im_smul_and_norm_denom_le (τ : ℍ) :
∃ γ : SL(2, ℤ), 1 / 2 ≤ im (γ • τ) ∧ ‖denom γ τ‖ ≤ 1 := by
rcases le_total (1 / 2) τ.im with h | h
· exact ⟨1, (one_smul SL(2, ℤ) τ).symm ▸ h, by simp only [coe_one, denom_one, norm_one, le_refl]⟩
· refine (exists_one_half_le_im_smul τ).imp (fun γ hγ ↦ ⟨hγ, ?_⟩)
have h1 : τ.im ≤ (γ • τ).im := h.trans hγ
rw [im_smul_eq_div_normSq, le_div_iff₀ (normSq_denom_pos (↑γ) τ), normSq_eq_norm_sq] at h1
simpa only [sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one, abs_norm] using
(mul_le_iff_le_one_right τ.2).mp h1
end ModularGroup
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Modular.lean | 513 | 531 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.Nontrivial := by
rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩
exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.einfsep ≠ ∞) : s.Nontrivial :=
nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hs)
theorem Subsingleton.einfsep (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s.einfsep = ∞ := by
rw [einfsep_top]
exact fun _ hx _ hy hxy => (hxy <| hs hx hy).elim
theorem le_einfsep_image_iff {d} {f : β → α} {s : Set β} : d ≤ einfsep (f '' s)
↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≠ f y → d ≤ edist (f x) (f y) := by
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, forall_mem_image]
theorem le_edist_of_le_einfsep {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hd : d ≤ s.einfsep) : d ≤ edist x y :=
le_einfsep_iff.1 hd x hx y hy hxy
theorem einfsep_le_edist_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) :
s.einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
le_edist_of_le_einfsep hx hy hxy le_rfl
theorem einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hxy' : edist x y ≤ d) : s.einfsep ≤ d :=
le_trans (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hx hy hxy) hxy'
theorem le_einfsep {d} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y) : d ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep_iff.2 h
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_empty : (∅ : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_empty.einfsep
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_singleton : ({x} : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_singleton.einfsep
theorem einfsep_iUnion_mem_option {ι : Type*} (o : Option ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
(⋃ i ∈ o, s i).einfsep = ⨅ i ∈ o, (s i).einfsep := by cases o <;> simp
theorem einfsep_anti (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.einfsep ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep fun _x hx _y hy => einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (hst hx) (hst hy)
theorem einfsep_insert_le : (insert x s).einfsep ≤ ⨅ (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y := by
simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
exact fun _ hy hxy => einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy) hxy
theorem le_einfsep_pair : edist x y ⊓ edist y x ≤ ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep := by
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, inf_le_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
rintro a (rfl | rfl) b (rfl | rfl) hab <;> (try simp only [le_refl, true_or, or_true]) <;>
contradiction
theorem einfsep_pair_le_left (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _)) hxy
theorem einfsep_pair_le_right (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep ≤ edist y x := by
rw [pair_comm]; exact einfsep_pair_le_left hxy.symm
theorem einfsep_pair_eq_inf (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep = edist x y ⊓ edist y x :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (einfsep_pair_le_left hxy) (einfsep_pair_le_right hxy)) le_einfsep_pair
theorem einfsep_eq_iInf : s.einfsep = ⨅ d : s.offDiag, (uncurry edist) (d : α × α) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ => ?_
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, le_iInf_iff, imp_forall_iff, SetCoe.forall, mem_offDiag,
Prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
theorem einfsep_of_fintype [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] :
s.einfsep = s.offDiag.toFinset.inf (uncurry edist) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ => ?_
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, Finset.le_inf_iff, mem_toFinset, mem_offDiag,
Prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
theorem Finite.einfsep (hs : s.Finite) : s.einfsep = hs.offDiag.toFinset.inf (uncurry edist) := by
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ => ?_
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, Finset.le_inf_iff, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_offDiag,
Prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
theorem Finset.coe_einfsep [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} :
(s : Set α).einfsep = s.offDiag.inf (uncurry edist) := by
simp_rw [einfsep_of_fintype, ← Finset.coe_offDiag, Finset.toFinset_coe]
theorem Nontrivial.einfsep_exists_of_finite [Finite s] (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ s.einfsep = edist x y := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype s
simp_rw [einfsep_of_fintype]
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_inf s.offDiag.toFinset (by simpa) (uncurry edist) with ⟨w, hxy, hed⟩
simp_rw [mem_toFinset] at hxy
exact ⟨w.fst, hxy.1, w.snd, hxy.2.1, hxy.2.2, hed⟩
theorem Finite.einfsep_exists_of_nontrivial (hsf : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ s.einfsep = edist x y :=
letI := hsf.fintype
hs.einfsep_exists_of_finite
end EDist
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {x y z : α} {s : Set α}
theorem einfsep_pair (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).einfsep = edist x y := by
nth_rw 1 [← min_self (edist x y)]
convert einfsep_pair_eq_inf hxy using 2
rw [edist_comm]
theorem einfsep_insert : einfsep (insert x s) =
(⨅ (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y) ⊓ s.einfsep := by
refine le_antisymm (le_min einfsep_insert_le (einfsep_anti (subset_insert _ _))) ?_
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, inf_le_iff, mem_insert_iff]
rintro y (rfl | hy) z (rfl | hz) hyz
· exact False.elim (hyz rfl)
· exact Or.inl (iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf₂_le hz hyz))
· rw [edist_comm]
exact Or.inl (iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf₂_le hy hyz.symm))
· exact Or.inr (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hy hz hyz)
theorem einfsep_triple (hxy : x ≠ y) (hyz : y ≠ z) (hxz : x ≠ z) :
einfsep ({x, y, z} : Set α) = edist x y ⊓ edist x z ⊓ edist y z := by
simp_rw [einfsep_insert, iInf_insert, iInf_singleton, einfsep_singleton, inf_top_eq,
ciInf_pos hxy, ciInf_pos hyz, ciInf_pos hxz]
theorem le_einfsep_pi_of_le {π : β → Type*} [Fintype β] [∀ b, PseudoEMetricSpace (π b)]
{s : ∀ b : β, Set (π b)} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ b, c ≤ einfsep (s b)) :
c ≤ einfsep (Set.pi univ s) := by
refine le_einfsep fun x hx y hy hxy => ?_
rw [mem_univ_pi] at hx hy
rcases Function.ne_iff.mp hxy with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact le_trans (le_einfsep_iff.1 (h i) _ (hx _) _ (hy _) hi) (edist_le_pi_edist _ _ i)
end PseudoEMetricSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] {s : Set α}
theorem subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top (hs : s.einfsep = ∞) : s.Subsingleton := by
rw [einfsep_top] at hs
exact fun _ hx _ hy => of_not_not fun hxy => edist_ne_top _ _ (hs _ hx _ hy hxy)
theorem einfsep_eq_top_iff : s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top, Subsingleton.einfsep⟩
theorem Nontrivial.einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.einfsep ≠ ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
rw [not_nontrivial_iff]
exact subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top hs
theorem Nontrivial.einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.einfsep < ∞ := by
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
exact hs.einfsep_ne_top
theorem einfsep_lt_top_iff : s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top, Nontrivial.einfsep_lt_top⟩
theorem einfsep_ne_top_iff : s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top, Nontrivial.einfsep_ne_top⟩
theorem le_einfsep_of_forall_dist_le {d} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ dist x y) :
ENNReal.ofReal d ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep fun x hx y hy hxy => (edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (h x hx y hy hxy)
end PseudoMetricSpace
section EMetricSpace
variable [EMetricSpace α] {s : Set α}
theorem einfsep_pos_of_finite [Finite s] : 0 < s.einfsep := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
by_cases hs : s.Nontrivial
· rcases hs.einfsep_exists_of_finite with ⟨x, _hx, y, _hy, hxy, hxy'⟩
exact hxy'.symm ▸ edist_pos.2 hxy
· rw [not_nontrivial_iff] at hs
exact hs.einfsep.symm ▸ WithTop.top_pos
theorem relatively_discrete_of_finite [Finite s] :
∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [← einfsep_pos]
exact einfsep_pos_of_finite
theorem Finite.einfsep_pos (hs : s.Finite) : 0 < s.einfsep :=
letI := hs.fintype
einfsep_pos_of_finite
theorem Finite.relatively_discrete (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y :=
letI := hs.fintype
relatively_discrete_of_finite
end EMetricSpace
end Einfsep
section Infsep
open ENNReal
open Set Function
/-- The "infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def infsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal s.einfsep
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s : Set α}
theorem infsep_zero : s.infsep = 0 ↔ s.einfsep = 0 ∨ s.einfsep = ∞ := by
rw [infsep, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff]
theorem infsep_nonneg : 0 ≤ s.infsep :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem infsep_pos : 0 < s.infsep ↔ 0 < s.einfsep ∧ s.einfsep < ∞ := by
simp_rw [infsep, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff]
theorem Subsingleton.infsep_zero (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s.infsep = 0 :=
Set.infsep_zero.mpr <| Or.inr hs.einfsep
theorem nontrivial_of_infsep_pos (hs : 0 < s.infsep) : s.Nontrivial := by
contrapose hs
rw [not_nontrivial_iff] at hs
exact hs.infsep_zero ▸ lt_irrefl _
theorem infsep_empty : (∅ : Set α).infsep = 0 :=
subsingleton_empty.infsep_zero
theorem infsep_singleton : ({x} : Set α).infsep = 0 :=
subsingleton_singleton.infsep_zero
theorem infsep_pair_le_toReal_inf (hxy : x ≠ y) :
({x, y} : Set α).infsep ≤ (edist x y ⊓ edist y x).toReal := by
simp_rw [infsep, einfsep_pair_eq_inf hxy]
simp
end EDist
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {x y : α}
theorem infsep_pair_eq_toReal : ({x, y} : Set α).infsep = (edist x y).toReal := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy]
simp only [infsep_singleton, pair_eq_singleton, edist_self, ENNReal.toReal_zero]
· rw [infsep, einfsep_pair hxy]
end PseudoEMetricSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x y z : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem Nontrivial.le_infsep_iff {d} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
d ≤ s.infsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ dist x y := by
simp_rw [infsep, ← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal hs.einfsep_ne_top, le_einfsep_iff, edist_dist,
ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff dist_nonneg]
theorem Nontrivial.infsep_lt_iff {d} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
s.infsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ dist x y < d := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact hs.le_infsep_iff
| theorem Nontrivial.le_infsep {d} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ dist x y) : d ≤ s.infsep :=
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 340 | 341 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Gabin Kolly
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.FinitelyGenerated
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Quotients
import Mathlib.Order.DirectedInverseSystem
/-!
# Direct Limits of First-Order Structures
This file constructs the direct limit of a directed system of first-order embeddings.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit G f` is the direct limit of the directed system `f` of
first-order embeddings between the structures indexed by `G`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.lift` is the universal property of the direct limit: maps
from the components to another module that respect the directed system structure give rise to
a unique map out of the direct limit.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.equiv_lift` is the equivalence between limits of
isomorphic direct systems.
-/
universe v w w' u₁ u₂
open FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure Set
variable {L : Language} {ι : Type v} [Preorder ι]
variable {G : ι → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G i)]
variable (f : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → G i ↪[L] G j)
namespace DirectedSystem
alias map_self := DirectedSystem.map_self'
alias map_map := DirectedSystem.map_map'
variable {G' : ℕ → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G' i)] (f' : ∀ n : ℕ, G' n ↪[L] G' (n + 1))
/-- Given a chain of embeddings of structures indexed by `ℕ`, defines a `DirectedSystem` by
composing them. -/
def natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : G' m ↪[L] G' n :=
Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k g => (f' k).comp g) (Embedding.refl L _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(natLERec f' m n h : G' m → G' n) = Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k => f' k) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
ext x
induction' k with k ih
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_self, Embedding.refl_apply, Nat.leRecOn_self]
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, ← natLERec,
Embedding.comp_apply, ih]
| instance natLERec.directedSystem : DirectedSystem G' fun i j h => natLERec f' i j h :=
⟨fun _ _ => congr (congr rfl (Nat.leRecOn_self _)) rfl,
fun _ _ _ hij hjk => by simp [Nat.leRecOn_trans hij hjk]⟩
end DirectedSystem
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Alias for `Σ i, G i`.
Instead of `Σ i, G i`, we use the alias `Language.Structure.Sigma` which depends on `f`.
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/DirectLimit.lean | 67 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) {Y} (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun _ hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) {X} (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 y` for all `y` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `t ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `t ×ˢ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set Y} {X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
-- TODO: Is there a way to prove directly the `inf` version and then deduce the `Prod` one ?
-- That would seem a bit more natural.
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ⊓ l := by
have : ∀ f : Filter X, f ⊓ l = comap (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (f ×ˢ l) := fun f ↦ by
simpa only [comap_prod] using congrArg₂ (· ⊓ ·) comap_id.symm comap_id.symm
simp_rw [this, ← comap_iSup, hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup]
theorem IsCompact.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ x ∈ K, l ⊓ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [inf_comm l, hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup]
/-- If `s : Set X` belongs to `𝓝 x ⊓ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `T ∈ l` such that `U ∩ T ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_inf_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l :=
(hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- If `s : Set S` belongs to `l ⊓ 𝓝 x` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `T ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `T ∩ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_inf_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- To show that `∀ y ∈ K, P x y` holds for `x` close enough to `x₀` when `K` is compact,
it is sufficient to show that for all `y₀ ∈ K` there `P x y` holds for `(x, y)` close enough
to `(x₀, y₀)`.
Provided for backwards compatibility,
see `IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall` for a stronger statement.
-/
theorem IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually {x₀ : X} {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K)
{P : X → Y → Prop} (hP : ∀ y ∈ K, ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x₀, y), P z.1 z.2) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ y ∈ K, P x y := by
simp only [nhds_prod_eq, ← eventually_iSup, ← hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup] at hP
exact hP.curry.mono fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhdsSet
theorem isCompact_empty : IsCompact (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf hsf =>
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
theorem isCompact_singleton {x : X} : IsCompact ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf hfa =>
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
| theorem Set.Subsingleton.isCompact (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsCompact s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isCompact_empty fun _ => isCompact_singleton
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 437 | 439 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Paracompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.PartitionOfUnity
/-!
# Lemmas about (e)metric spaces that need partition of unity
The main lemma in this file (see `Metric.exists_continuous_real_forall_closedBall_subset`) says the
following. Let `X` be a metric space. Let `K : ι → Set X` be a locally finite family of closed sets,
let `U : ι → Set X` be a family of open sets such that `K i ⊆ U i` for all `i`. Then there exists a
positive continuous function `δ : C(X, → ℝ)` such that for any `i` and `x ∈ K i`, we have
`Metric.closedBall x (δ x) ⊆ U i`. We also formulate versions of this lemma for extended metric
spaces and for different codomains (`ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`).
We also prove a few auxiliary lemmas to be used later in a proof of the smooth version of this
lemma.
## Tags
metric space, partition of unity, locally finite
-/
open Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter Set Function TopologicalSpace
variable {ι X : Type*}
namespace EMetric
variable [EMetricSpace X] {K : ι → Set X} {U : ι → Set X}
/-- Let `K : ι → Set X` be a locally finite family of closed sets in an emetric space. Let
`U : ι → Set X` be a family of open sets such that `K i ⊆ U i` for all `i`. Then for any point
`x : X`, for sufficiently small `r : ℝ≥0∞` and for `y` sufficiently close to `x`, for all `i`, if
`y ∈ K i`, then `EMetric.closedBall y r ⊆ U i`. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_zero_forall_closedBall_subset (hK : ∀ i, IsClosed (K i))
(hU : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hKU : ∀ i, K i ⊆ U i) (hfin : LocallyFinite K) (x : X) :
| ∀ᶠ p : ℝ≥0∞ × X in 𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 x, ∀ i, p.2 ∈ K i → closedBall p.2 p.1 ⊆ U i := by
suffices ∀ i, x ∈ K i → ∀ᶠ p : ℝ≥0∞ × X in 𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 x, closedBall p.2 p.1 ⊆ U i by
apply mp_mem ((eventually_all_finite (hfin.point_finite x)).2 this)
(mp_mem (@tendsto_snd ℝ≥0∞ _ (𝓝 0) _ _ (hfin.iInter_compl_mem_nhds hK x)) _)
apply univ_mem'
rintro ⟨r, y⟩ hxy hyU i hi
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff, not_imp_not, mem_preimage] at hxy
exact hyU _ (hxy _ hi)
intro i hi
rcases nhds_basis_closed_eball.mem_iff.1 ((hU i).mem_nhds <| hKU i hi) with ⟨R, hR₀, hR⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.mp hR₀ with ⟨r, hr₀, hrR⟩
filter_upwards [prod_mem_prod (eventually_lt_nhds hr₀)
(closedBall_mem_nhds x (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hrR))] with p hp z hz
apply hR
calc
edist z x ≤ edist z p.2 + edist p.2 x := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ p.1 + (R - p.1) := add_le_add hz <| le_trans hp.2 <| tsub_le_tsub_left hp.1.out.le _
_ = R := add_tsub_cancel_of_le (lt_trans (by exact hp.1) hrR).le
theorem exists_forall_closedBall_subset_aux₁ (hK : ∀ i, IsClosed (K i)) (hU : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PartitionOfUnity.lean | 42 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ThickenedIndicator
/-!
# Spaces where indicators of closed sets have decreasing approximations by continuous functions
In this file we define a typeclass `HasOuterApproxClosed` for topological spaces in which indicator
functions of closed sets have sequences of bounded continuous functions approximating them from
above. All pseudo-emetrizable spaces have this property, see `instHasOuterApproxClosed`.
In spaces with the `HasOuterApproxClosed` property, finite Borel measures are uniquely characterized
by the integrals of bounded continuous functions. Also weak convergence of finite measures and
convergence in distribution for random variables behave somewhat well in spaces with this property.
## Main definitions
* `HasOuterApproxClosed`: the typeclass for topological spaces in which indicator functions of
closed sets have sequences of bounded continuous functions approximating them.
* `IsClosed.apprSeq`: a (non-constructive) choice of an approximating sequence to the indicator
function of a closed set.
## Main results
* `instHasOuterApproxClosed`: Any pseudo-emetrizable space has the property `HasOuterApproxClosed`.
* `tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq`: The integrals of the approximating functions to the indicator of a
closed set tend to the measure of the set.
* `ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure`: Two finite measures are equal if the integrals
of all bounded continuous functions with respect to both agree.
-/
open BoundedContinuousFunction MeasureTheory Topology Metric Filter Set ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
section auxiliary
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and tend to a
limit, then their integrals against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere;
* integration is `MeasureTheory.lintegral`, i.e., the functions and their integrals are
`ℝ≥0∞`-valued.
-/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} [L.IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {fs : ι → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, fs i ω ≤ c) {f : Ω → ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ fs i ω) L (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ ω, fs i ω ∂μ) L (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun _ ↦ c)
(Eventually.of_forall fun i ↦ (ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp (fs i).continuous).measurable) ?_
(@lintegral_const_lt_top _ _ μ _ _ (@ENNReal.coe_ne_top c)).ne ?_
· simpa only [Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_const
· simpa only [Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.tendsto_coe] using fs_lim
/-- If bounded continuous functions tend to the indicator of a measurable set and are
uniformly bounded, then their integrals against a finite measure tend to the measure of the set.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere.
-/
theorem measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[L.IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure Ω)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0} {E : Set Ω} (E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (fs : ι → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)
(fs_bdd : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, fs i ω ≤ c)
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ fs i ω) L (𝓝 (indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ lintegral μ fun ω ↦ fs n ω) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
convert tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const μ fs_bdd fs_lim
have aux : ∀ ω, indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) ω = ↑(indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω) :=
fun ω ↦ by simp only [ENNReal.coe_indicator, ENNReal.coe_one]
simp_rw [← aux, lintegral_indicator E_mble]
simp only [lintegral_one, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
/-- If a sequence of bounded continuous functions tends to the indicator of a measurable set and
the functions are uniformly bounded, then their integrals against a finite measure tend to the
measure of the set.
A similar result with more general assumptions is
`MeasureTheory.measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator`.
-/
theorem measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_indicator
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0} {E : Set Ω} (E_mble : MeasurableSet E)
(fs : ℕ → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) (fs_bdd : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c)
(fs_lim : Tendsto (fun n ω ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (indicator E fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ lintegral μ fun ω ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have fs_lim' :
∀ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (fs n ω : ℝ≥0)) atTop (𝓝 (indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω)) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at fs_lim
exact fun ω ↦ fs_lim ω
apply measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator μ E_mble fs
(Eventually.of_forall fun n ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fs_bdd n)) (Eventually.of_forall fs_lim')
/-- The integrals of thickened indicators of a closed set against a finite measure tend to the
measure of the closed set if the thickening radii tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_thickenedIndicator_of_isClosed {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {F : Set Ω}
(F_closed : IsClosed F) {δs : ℕ → ℝ} (δs_pos : ∀ n, 0 < δs n)
(δs_lim : Tendsto δs atTop (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ lintegral μ fun ω ↦ (thickenedIndicator (δs_pos n) F ω : ℝ≥0∞)) atTop
(𝓝 (μ F)) := by
apply measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_indicator μ F_closed.measurableSet
(fun n ↦ thickenedIndicator (δs_pos n) F) fun n ω ↦ thickenedIndicator_le_one (δs_pos n) F ω
have key := thickenedIndicator_tendsto_indicator_closure δs_pos δs_lim F
rwa [F_closed.closure_eq] at key
end MeasureTheory -- namespace
end auxiliary -- section
section HasOuterApproxClosed
/-- A type class for topological spaces in which the indicator functions of closed sets can be
approximated pointwise from above by a sequence of bounded continuous functions. -/
class HasOuterApproxClosed (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
exAppr : ∀ (F : Set X), IsClosed F → ∃ (fseq : ℕ → (X →ᵇ ℝ≥0)),
(∀ n x, fseq n x ≤ 1) ∧ (∀ n x, x ∈ F → 1 ≤ fseq n x) ∧
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (fun x ↦ fseq n x)) atTop (𝓝 (indicator F fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)))
namespace HasOuterApproxClosed
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [HasOuterApproxClosed X]
variable {F : Set X} (hF : IsClosed F)
/-- A sequence of continuous functions `X → [0,1]` tending to the indicator of a closed set. -/
noncomputable def _root_.IsClosed.apprSeq : ℕ → (X →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :=
Exists.choose (HasOuterApproxClosed.exAppr F hF)
lemma apprSeq_apply_le_one (n : ℕ) (x : X) :
hF.apprSeq n x ≤ 1 :=
(Exists.choose_spec (HasOuterApproxClosed.exAppr F hF)).1 n x
lemma apprSeq_apply_eq_one (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hxF : x ∈ F) :
hF.apprSeq n x = 1 :=
le_antisymm (apprSeq_apply_le_one _ _ _)
((Exists.choose_spec (HasOuterApproxClosed.exAppr F hF)).2.1 n x hxF)
lemma tendsto_apprSeq :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (fun x ↦ hF.apprSeq n x)) atTop (𝓝 (indicator F fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0))) :=
(Exists.choose_spec (HasOuterApproxClosed.exAppr F hF)).2.2
lemma indicator_le_apprSeq (n : ℕ) :
indicator F (fun _ ↦ 1) ≤ hF.apprSeq n := by
intro x
by_cases hxF : x ∈ F
· simp only [hxF, indicator_of_mem, apprSeq_apply_eq_one hF n, le_refl]
· simp only [hxF, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le]
/-- The measure of a closed set is at most the integral of any function in a decreasing
approximating sequence to the indicator of the set. -/
theorem measure_le_lintegral [MeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X) (n : ℕ) :
μ F ≤ ∫⁻ x, (hF.apprSeq n x : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ := by
convert_to ∫⁻ x, (F.indicator (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0∞))) x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, hF.apprSeq n x ∂μ
· rw [lintegral_indicator hF.measurableSet]
| simp only [lintegral_one, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
· apply lintegral_mono
intro x
by_cases hxF : x ∈ F
· simp only [hxF, indicator_of_mem, apprSeq_apply_eq_one hF n hxF, ENNReal.coe_one, le_refl]
· simp only [hxF, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le]
/-- The integrals along a decreasing approximating sequence to the indicator of a closed set
tend to the measure of the closed set. -/
lemma tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq [MeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/HasOuterApproxClosed.lean | 166 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Baire spaces
A topological space is called a *Baire space*
if a countable intersection of dense open subsets is dense.
Baire theorems say that all completely metrizable spaces
and all locally compact regular spaces are Baire spaces.
We prove the theorems in `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/CompleteMetrizable`
and `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/LocallyCompactRegular`.
In this file we prove various corollaries of Baire theorems.
The good concept underlying the theorems is that of a Gδ set, i.e., a countable intersection
of open sets. Then Baire theorem can also be formulated as the fact that a countable
intersection of dense Gδ sets is a dense Gδ set. We deduce this version from Baire property.
We also prove the important consequence that, if the space is
covered by a countable union of closed sets, then the union of their interiors is dense.
We also prove that in Baire spaces, the `residual` sets are exactly those containing a dense Gδ set.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace
variable {X α : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section BaireTheorem
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [BaireSpace X]
/-- Definition of a Baire space. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat {f : ℕ → Set X} (ho : ∀ n, IsOpen (f n))
(hd : ∀ n, Dense (f n)) : Dense (⋂ n, f n) :=
BaireSpace.baire_property f ho hd
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_isOpen {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) (hS : S.Countable)
(hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense s) : Dense (⋂₀ S) := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
· rcases hS.exists_eq_range h with ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat (forall_mem_range.1 ho) (forall_mem_range.1 hd)
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable set in any type. -/
theorem dense_biInter_of_isOpen {S : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen (f s))
(hS : S.Countable) (hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense (f s)) : Dense (⋂ s ∈ S, f s) := by
rw [← sInter_image]
refine dense_sInter_of_isOpen ?_ (hS.image _) ?_ <;> rwa [forall_mem_image]
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable type. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i))
(hd : ∀ i, Dense (f i)) : Dense (⋂ s, f s) :=
dense_sInter_of_isOpen (forall_mem_range.2 ho) (countable_range _) (forall_mem_range.2 hd)
/-- A set is residual (comeagre) if and only if it includes a dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem mem_residual {s : Set X} : s ∈ residual X ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t := by
constructor
· rw [mem_residual_iff]
rintro ⟨S, hSo, hSd, Sct, Ss⟩
refine ⟨_, Ss, ⟨_, fun t ht => hSo _ ht, Sct, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact dense_sInter_of_isOpen hSo Sct hSd
rintro ⟨t, ts, ho, hd⟩
exact mem_of_superset (residual_of_dense_Gδ ho hd) ts
/-- A property holds on a residual (comeagre) set if and only if it holds on some dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem eventually_residual {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in residual X, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Eventually, mem_residual, subset_def, mem_setOf_eq]
tauto
theorem dense_of_mem_residual {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ residual X) : Dense s :=
let ⟨_, hts, _, hd⟩ := mem_residual.1 hs
hd.mono hts
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_Gδ {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsGδ s) (hS : S.Countable)
(hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense s) : Dense (⋂₀ S) :=
dense_of_mem_residual ((countable_sInter_mem hS).mpr
(fun _ hs => residual_of_dense_Gδ (ho _ hs) (hd _ hs)))
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable type. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_Gδ [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set X} (ho : ∀ s, IsGδ (f s))
(hd : ∀ s, Dense (f s)) : Dense (⋂ s, f s) :=
dense_sInter_of_Gδ (forall_mem_range.2 ‹_›) (countable_range _) (forall_mem_range.2 ‹_›)
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable set in any type. -/
theorem dense_biInter_of_Gδ {S : Set α} {f : ∀ x ∈ S, Set X} (ho : ∀ s (H : s ∈ S), IsGδ (f s H))
(hS : S.Countable) (hd : ∀ s (H : s ∈ S), Dense (f s H)) : Dense (⋂ s ∈ S, f s ‹_›) := by
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.to_subtype
exact dense_iInter_of_Gδ (fun s => ho s s.2) fun s => hd s s.2
/-- Baire theorem: the intersection of two dense Gδ sets is dense. -/
theorem Dense.inter_of_Gδ {s t : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (ht : IsGδ t) (hsc : Dense s)
(htc : Dense t) : Dense (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_eq_iInter]
apply dense_iInter_of_Gδ <;> simp [Bool.forall_bool, *]
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with `⋃`. -/
theorem IsGδ.dense_iUnion_interior_of_closed [Countable ι] {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (hd : Dense s)
{f : ι → Set X} (hc : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, f i) :
Dense (⋃ i, interior (f i)) := by
let g i := (frontier (f i))ᶜ
have hgo : ∀ i, IsOpen (g i) := fun i => isClosed_frontier.isOpen_compl
have hgd : Dense (⋂ i, g i) := by
refine dense_iInter_of_isOpen hgo fun i x => ?_
rw [closure_compl, interior_frontier (hc _)]
exact id
refine (hd.inter_of_Gδ hs (.iInter_of_isOpen fun i => (hgo i)) hgd).mono ?_
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxg⟩
rw [mem_iInter] at hxg
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hU hxs) with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, self_diff_frontier (f i) ▸ ⟨hi, hxg _⟩⟩
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with a union over a countable set in any type. -/
| theorem IsGδ.dense_biUnion_interior_of_closed {t : Set α} {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (hd : Dense s)
(ht : t.Countable) {f : α → Set X} (hc : ∀ i ∈ t, IsClosed (f i)) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, f i) :
Dense (⋃ i ∈ t, interior (f i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall'] at *
exact hs.dense_iUnion_interior_of_closed hd hc hU
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with `⋃₀`. -/
theorem IsGδ.dense_sUnion_interior_of_closed {T : Set (Set X)} {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s)
(hd : Dense s) (hc : T.Countable) (hc' : ∀ t ∈ T, IsClosed t) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃₀ T) :
Dense (⋃ t ∈ T, interior t) :=
hs.dense_biUnion_interior_of_closed hd hc hc' <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
| Mathlib/Topology/Baire/Lemmas.lean | 132 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Cardinalities of finite types
This file defines the cardinality `Fintype.card α` as the number of elements in `(univ : Finset α)`.
We also include some elementary results on the values of `Fintype.card` on specific types.
## Main declarations
* `Fintype.card α`: Cardinality of a fintype. Equal to `Finset.univ.card`.
* `Finite.surjective_of_injective`: an injective function from a finite type to
itself is also surjective.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function
namespace Fintype
/-- `card α` is the number of elements in `α`, defined when `α` is a fintype. -/
def card (α) [Fintype α] : ℕ :=
(@univ α _).card
theorem subtype_card {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
@card { x // p x } (Fintype.subtype s H) = #s :=
Multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
theorem card_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
[Fintype { x // p x }] : card { x // p x } = #s := by
rw [← subtype_card s H]
congr!
@[simp]
theorem card_ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@Fintype.card p (ofFinset s H) = #s :=
Fintype.subtype_card s H
theorem card_of_finset' {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) [Fintype p] :
Fintype.card p = #s := by rw [← card_ofFinset s H]; congr!
end Fintype
namespace Fintype
theorem ofEquiv_card [Fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : @card β (ofEquiv α f) = card α :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
theorem card_congr {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (f : α ≃ β) : card α = card β := by
rw [← ofEquiv_card f]; congr!
@[congr]
theorem card_congr' {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (h : α = β) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (by rw [h])
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofSubsingleton`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use either `Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton` or
`Fintype.card_unique`. -/
theorem card_ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : @Fintype.card _ (ofSubsingleton a) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Unique α] [h : Fintype α] : Fintype.card α = 1 :=
Subsingleton.elim (ofSubsingleton default) h ▸ card_ofSubsingleton _
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofIsEmpty`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use `Fintype.card_eq_zero`. -/
theorem card_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : @Fintype.card α Fintype.ofIsEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
end Fintype
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
-- We use an arbitrary `[Fintype s]` instance here,
-- not necessarily coming from a `[Fintype α]`.
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_card {α : Type*} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinset.card = Fintype.card s :=
Multiset.card_map Subtype.val Finset.univ.val
end Set
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_univ [Fintype α] : #(univ : Finset α) = Fintype.card α := rfl
theorem Finset.eq_univ_of_card [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) (hs : #s = Fintype.card α) :
s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _) <| by rw [hs, Finset.card_univ]
theorem Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = univ :=
⟨s.eq_univ_of_card, by
rintro rfl
exact Finset.card_univ⟩
theorem Finset.card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
card_le_card (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem [Fintype α] {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hx : x ∉ s) :
#s < Fintype.card α :=
card_lt_card ⟨subset_univ s, not_forall.2 ⟨x, fun hx' => hx (hx' <| mem_univ x)⟩⟩
theorem Finset.card_lt_iff_ne_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s < Fintype.card α ↔ s ≠ Finset.univ :=
s.card_le_univ.lt_iff_ne.trans (not_congr s.card_eq_iff_eq_univ)
theorem Finset.card_compl_lt_iff_nonempty [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ < Fintype.card α ↔ s.Nonempty :=
sᶜ.card_lt_iff_ne_univ.trans s.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty
theorem Finset.card_univ_diff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#(univ \ s) = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_sdiff (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #sᶜ = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_univ_diff s
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_add_card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s + #sᶜ = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Finset.card_compl, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (card_le_univ s), Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_compl_add_card [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ + #s = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_add_card_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_compl_set [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype (↥sᶜ : Sort _)] :
Fintype.card (↥sᶜ : Sort _) = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card s := by
classical rw [← Set.toFinset_card, ← Set.toFinset_card, ← Finset.card_compl, Set.toFinset_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq (y : α) [Fintype { x // x = y }] :
Fintype.card { x // x = y } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq' (y : α) [Fintype { x // y = x }] :
Fintype.card { x // y = x } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_empty : Fintype.card Empty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_pempty : Fintype.card PEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_unit : Fintype.card Unit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_punit : Fintype.card PUnit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_bool : Fintype.card Bool = 2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_ulift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (ULift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_plift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (PLift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_orderDual (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card αᵒᵈ = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_lex (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (Lex α) = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
-- Note: The extra hypothesis `h` is there so that the rewrite lemma applies,
-- no matter what instance of `Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)` is used.
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_setUniv [Fintype α] {h : Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)} :
Fintype.card (Set.univ : Set α) = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_true [Fintype α] {h : Fintype {_a : α // True}} :
@Fintype.card {_a // True} h = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_subtype
simp
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inl` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `α` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumLeft {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) Sum.inl_injective
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inr` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `β` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumRight {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype β :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) Sum.inr_injective
theorem Finite.exists_univ_list (α) [Finite α] : ∃ l : List α, l.Nodup ∧ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨l, e⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep (@univ α _).1
have := And.intro (@univ α _).2 (@mem_univ_val α _)
exact ⟨_, by rwa [← e] at this⟩
theorem List.Nodup.length_le_card {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) :
l.length ≤ Fintype.card α := by
classical exact List.toFinset_card_of_nodup h ▸ l.toFinset.card_le_univ
namespace Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
theorem card_le_of_injective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : card α ≤ card β :=
Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn f (fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem card_le_of_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : card α ≤ card β :=
card_le_of_injective f f.2
theorem card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f) {b : β}
(w : b ∉ Set.range f) : card α < card β :=
calc
card α = (univ.map ⟨f, h⟩).card := (card_map _).symm
_ < card β :=
Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem (x := b) <| by
rwa [← mem_coe, coe_map, coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
theorem card_lt_of_injective_not_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f)
(h' : ¬Function.Surjective f) : card α < card β :=
let ⟨_y, hy⟩ := not_forall.1 h'
card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem f h hy
theorem card_le_of_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Surjective f) : card β ≤ card α :=
card_le_of_injective _ (Function.injective_surjInv h)
theorem card_range_le {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) [Fintype α] [Fintype (Set.range f)] :
Fintype.card (Set.range f) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective (fun a => ⟨f a, by simp⟩) fun ⟨_, a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, by simpa using ha⟩
theorem card_range {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [EmbeddingLike F α β] (f : F) [Fintype α]
[Fintype (Set.range f)] : Fintype.card (Set.range f) = Fintype.card α :=
Eq.symm <| Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.ofInjective _ <| EmbeddingLike.injective f
theorem card_eq_zero_iff : card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
rw [card, Finset.card_eq_zero, univ_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero [IsEmpty α] : card α = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
alias card_of_isEmpty := card_eq_zero
/-- A `Fintype` with cardinality zero is equivalent to `Empty`. -/
def cardEqZeroEquivEquivEmpty : card α = 0 ≃ (α ≃ Empty) :=
(Equiv.ofIff card_eq_zero_iff).trans (Equiv.equivEmptyEquiv α).symm
theorem card_pos_iff : 0 < card α ↔ Nonempty α :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_iff_comm.mp <| not_nonempty_iff.trans card_eq_zero_iff.symm
theorem card_pos [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < card α :=
card_pos_iff.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_ne_zero [Nonempty α] : card α ≠ 0 :=
_root_.ne_of_gt card_pos
instance [Nonempty α] : NeZero (card α) := ⟨card_ne_zero⟩
theorem existsUnique_iff_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(∃! a : α, p a) ↔ #{x | p x} = 1 := by
rw [Finset.card_eq_one]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
simp only [forall_true_left, Subset.antisymm_iff, subset_singleton_iff', singleton_subset_iff,
true_and, and_comm, mem_univ, mem_filter]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_iff_card_one := existsUnique_iff_card_one
nonrec theorem two_lt_card_iff : 2 < card α ↔ ∃ a b c : α, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
simp_rw [← Finset.card_univ, two_lt_card_iff, mem_univ, true_and]
theorem card_of_bijective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Fintype
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem surjective_of_injective {f : α → α} (hinj : Injective f) : Surjective f := by
intro x
have := Classical.propDecidable
cases nonempty_fintype α
have h₁ : image f univ = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _)
((card_image_of_injective univ hinj).symm ▸ le_rfl)
have h₂ : x ∈ image f univ := h₁.symm ▸ mem_univ x
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_image.1 h₂
exact ⟨y, h.2⟩
theorem injective_iff_surjective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨surjective_of_injective, fun hsurj =>
HasLeftInverse.injective ⟨surjInv hsurj, leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse
(surjective_of_injective (injective_surjInv _))
(rightInverse_surjInv _)⟩⟩
theorem injective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem surjective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Surjective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv {f : α → β} (e : α ≃ β) : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
have : Injective (e.symm ∘ f) ↔ Surjective (e.symm ∘ f) := injective_iff_surjective
⟨fun hinj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.surjective.comp (this.1 (e.symm.injective.comp hinj)),
fun hsurj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.injective.comp (this.2 (e.symm.surjective.comp hsurj))⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := injective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := surjective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.surjective_of_fintype,
_root_.Function.Surjective.injective_of_fintype⟩ :=
injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv
end Finite
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_coe (s : Finset α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = #s :=
@Fintype.card_of_finset' _ _ _ (fun _ => Iff.rfl) (id _)
/-- We can inflate a set `s` to any bigger size. -/
lemma Finset.exists_superset_card_eq [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} (hsn : #s ≤ n)
(hnα : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ #t = n := by simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.subset_univ hsn hnα
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_prop : Fintype.card Prop = 2 :=
rfl
theorem set_fintype_card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype s)
theorem set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = Set.univ := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ, ← Set.toFinset_univ, Set.toFinset_inj]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_le [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
lemma Fintype.card_subtype_lt [Fintype α] {p : α → Prop} [Fintype {a // p a}] {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) :
Fintype.card { x // p x } < Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (b := x) (↑) Subtype.coe_injective <| by
rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } = #{x | p x} := by
refine Fintype.card_of_subtype _ ?_
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_compl [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card { x // p x } := by
classical
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype (Set.toFinset { x | p x }ᶜ), Set.toFinset_compl,
Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_of_subtype] <;>
· intro
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_mono (p q : α → Prop) (h : p ≤ q) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // q x }] : Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card { x // q x } :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ h)
/-- If two subtypes of a fintype have equal cardinality, so do their complements. -/
theorem Fintype.card_compl_eq_card_compl [Finite α] (p q : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] [Fintype { x // q x }] [Fintype { x // ¬q x }]
(h : Fintype.card { x // p x } = Fintype.card { x // q x }) :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card { x // ¬q x } := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
simp only [Fintype.card_subtype_compl, h]
theorem Fintype.card_quotient_le [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α)
[DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] : Fintype.card (Quotient s) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ Quotient.mk'_surjective
theorem univ_eq_singleton_of_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (x : α) (h : Fintype.card α = 1) :
(univ : Finset α) = {x} := by
symm
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ {x})
apply le_of_eq
simp [h, Finset.card_univ]
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] [IsIrrefl α r] :
WellFounded r := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
have (x y) (hxy : r x y) : #{z | r z x} < #{z | r z y} :=
Finset.card_lt_card <| by
simp only [Finset.lt_iff_ssubset.symm, lt_iff_le_not_le, Finset.le_iff_subset,
Finset.subset_iff, mem_filter, true_and, mem_univ, hxy]
exact
⟨fun z hzx => _root_.trans hzx hxy,
not_forall_of_exists_not ⟨x, Classical.not_imp.2 ⟨hxy, irrefl x⟩⟩⟩
exact Subrelation.wf (this _ _) (measure _).wf
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedLT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedLT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedGT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedGT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
end Finite
-- Shortcut instances to make sure those are found even in the presence of other instances
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/WellFoundedLT.20Prop.20is.20not.20found.20when.20importing.20too.20much
instance Bool.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Bool := inferInstance
instance Bool.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Bool := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Prop := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Prop := inferInstance
section Trunc
/-- A `Fintype` with positive cardinality constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfCardPos {α} [Fintype α] (h : 0 < Fintype.card α) : Trunc α :=
letI := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp h
truncOfNonemptyFintype α
end Trunc
/-- A custom induction principle for fintypes. The base case is a subsingleton type,
and the induction step is for non-trivial types, and one can assume the hypothesis for
smaller types (via `Fintype.card`).
The major premise is `Fintype α`, so to use this with the `induction` tactic you have to give a name
to that instance and use that name.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Fintype.induction_subsingleton_or_nontrivial {P : ∀ (α) [Fintype α], Prop} (α : Type*)
[Fintype α] (hbase : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Subsingleton α], P α)
(hstep : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Nontrivial α],
(∀ (β) [Fintype β], Fintype.card β < Fintype.card α → P β) → P α) :
P α := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, Fintype.card α = n := ⟨Fintype.card α, rfl⟩
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih generalizing α
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with hsing | hnontriv
· apply hbase
· apply hstep
intro β _ hlt
rw [hn] at hlt
exact ih (Fintype.card β) hlt _ rfl
|
section Fin
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Card.lean | 474 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann, Kyle Miller, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Fibonacci Numbers
This file defines the fibonacci series, proves results about it and introduces
methods to compute it quickly.
-/
/-!
# The Fibonacci Sequence
## Summary
Definition of the Fibonacci sequence `F₀ = 0, F₁ = 1, Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁`.
## Main Definitions
- `Nat.fib` returns the stream of Fibonacci numbers.
## Main Statements
- `Nat.fib_add_two`: shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.`.
- `Nat.fib_gcd`: `fib n` is a strong divisibility sequence.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_sum_choose`: `fib` is given by the sum of `Nat.choose` along an antidiagonal.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_succ_sum`: shows that `F₀ + F₁ + ⋯ + Fₙ = Fₙ₊₂ - 1`.
- `Nat.fib_two_mul` and `Nat.fib_two_mul_add_one` are the basis for an efficient algorithm to
compute `fib` (see `Nat.fastFib`).
## Implementation Notes
For efficiency purposes, the sequence is defined using `Stream.iterate`.
## Tags
fib, fibonacci
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Implementation of the fibonacci sequence satisfying
`fib 0 = 0, fib 1 = 1, fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1)`.
*Note:* We use a stream iterator for better performance when compared to the naive recursive
implementation.
-/
@[pp_nodot]
def fib (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.snd, p.fst + p.snd))^[n] (0, 1)).fst
@[simp]
theorem fib_zero : fib 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_one : fib 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_two : fib 2 = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.` -/
theorem fib_add_two {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1) := by
simp [fib, Function.iterate_succ_apply']
lemma fib_add_one : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → fib (n + 1) = fib (n - 1) + fib n
| _n + 1, _ => fib_add_two
theorem fib_le_fib_succ {n : ℕ} : fib n ≤ fib (n + 1) := by cases n <;> simp [fib_add_two]
@[mono]
theorem fib_mono : Monotone fib :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun _ => fib_le_fib_succ
@[simp] lemma fib_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, fib n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| 1 => Iff.rfl
| n + 2 => by simp [fib_add_two, fib_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma fib_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < fib n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem fib_add_two_sub_fib_add_one {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) - fib (n + 1) = fib n := by
rw [fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem fib_lt_fib_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : fib n < fib (n + 1) := by
rcases exists_add_of_le hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← tsub_pos_iff_lt, add_comm 2, add_right_comm, fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right, fib_pos]
exact succ_pos n
/-- `fib (n + 2)` is strictly monotone. -/
theorem fib_add_two_strictMono : StrictMono fun n => fib (n + 2) := by
refine strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => ?_
rw [add_right_comm]
exact fib_lt_fib_succ (self_le_add_left _ _)
lemma fib_strictMonoOn : StrictMonoOn fib (Set.Ici 2)
| _m + 2, _, _n + 2, _, hmn => fib_add_two_strictMono <| lt_of_add_lt_add_right hmn
lemma fib_lt_fib {m : ℕ} (hm : 2 ≤ m) : ∀ {n}, fib m < fib n ↔ m < n
| 0 => by simp [hm]
| 1 => by simp [hm]
| n + 2 => fib_strictMonoOn.lt_iff_lt hm <| by simp
| theorem le_fib_self {n : ℕ} (five_le_n : 5 ≤ n) : n ≤ fib n := by
induction' five_le_n with n five_le_n IH
· -- 5 ≤ fib 5
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Basic.lean | 120 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
| theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 365 | 373 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
/-!
# Derivatives of `x ↦ x⁻¹` and `f x / g x`
In this file we prove `(x⁻¹)' = -1 / x ^ 2`, `((f x)⁻¹)' = -f' x / (f x) ^ 2`, and
`(f x / g x)' = (f' x * g x - f x * g' x) / (g x) ^ 2` for different notions of derivative.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u
open scoped Topology
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜}
section Inverse
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x⁻¹` -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_inv (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt Inv.inv (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x := by
suffices
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => (p.1 - p.2) * ((x * x)⁻¹ - (p.1 * p.2)⁻¹)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p =>
(p.1 - p.2) * 1 by
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.congr' ?_ (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => mul_one _)
refine Eventually.mono ((isOpen_ne.prod isOpen_ne).mem_nhds ⟨hx, hx⟩) ?_
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ ⟨hy, hz⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq] at hy hz
-- hy : y ≠ 0, hz : z ≠ 0
field_simp [hx, hy, hz]
ring
refine (isBigO_refl (fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 - p.2) _).mul_isLittleO ((isLittleO_one_iff 𝕜).2 ?_)
rw [← sub_self (x * x)⁻¹]
exact tendsto_const_nhds.sub ((continuous_mul.tendsto (x, x)).inv₀ <| mul_ne_zero hx hx)
theorem hasDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt (fun y => y⁻¹) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (s : Set 𝕜) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) s x :=
(hasDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem differentiableAt_inv_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun H => NormedField.continuousAt_inv.1 H.continuousAt, fun H =>
(hasDerivAt_inv H).differentiableAt⟩
theorem deriv_inv : deriv (fun x => x⁻¹) x = -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hne)
· simp [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (mt differentiableAt_inv_iff.1 (not_not.2 rfl))]
· exact (hasDerivAt_inv hne).deriv
@[simp]
theorem deriv_inv' : (deriv fun x : 𝕜 => x⁻¹) = fun x => -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ :=
funext fun _ => deriv_inv
theorem derivWithin_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => x⁻¹) s x = -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.derivWithin (differentiableAt_inv x_ne_zero) hxs]
exact deriv_inv
theorem hasFDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hasDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(hasFDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem fderiv_inv : fderiv 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) x = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) := by
rw [← deriv_fderiv, deriv_inv]
theorem fderivWithin_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) s x = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (differentiableAt_inv x_ne_zero) hxs]
exact fderiv_inv
variable {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.inv (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y)⁻¹) (-c' / c x ^ 2) s x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_inv hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hc using 1
field_simp
theorem HasDerivAt.inv (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => (c y)⁻¹) (-c' / c x ^ 2) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.inv hx
theorem derivWithin_inv' (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
derivWithin (fun x => (c x)⁻¹) s x = -derivWithin c s x / c x ^ 2 := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.inv hx).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_inv'' (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x => (c x)⁻¹) x = -deriv c x / c x ^ 2 :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.inv hx).deriv
end Inverse
section Division
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ c x / d x` -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {c' d' : 𝕜'}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.div (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hd : HasDerivWithinAt d d' s x)
(hx : d x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / d x ^ 2) s x := by
convert hc.mul ((hasDerivAt_inv hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hd) using 1
· simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, (· ∘ ·)]
· field_simp
ring
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.div (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictDerivAt d d' x)
(hx : d x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / d x ^ 2) x := by
convert hc.mul ((hasStrictDerivAt_inv hx).comp x hd) using 1
· simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, (· ∘ ·)]
· field_simp
ring
theorem HasDerivAt.div (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasDerivAt d d' x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / d x ^ 2) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.div hd hx
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.div (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => c x / d x) s x :=
(hc.hasDerivWithinAt.div hd.hasDerivWithinAt hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.div (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x)
(hx : d x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => c x / d x) x :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.div hd.hasDerivAt hx).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.div (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hd : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 d s)
(hx : ∀ x ∈ s, d x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => c x / d x) s := fun x h =>
(hc x h).div (hd x h) (hx x h)
@[simp]
theorem Differentiable.div (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : Differentiable 𝕜 d) (hx : ∀ x, d x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun x => c x / d x := fun x => (hc x).div (hd x) (hx x)
theorem derivWithin_div (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x)
(hx : d x ≠ 0) :
derivWithin (fun x => c x / d x) s x =
(derivWithin c s x * d x - c x * derivWithin d s x) / d x ^ 2 := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.div hd.hasDerivWithinAt hx).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_div (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x => c x / d x) x = (deriv c x * d x - c x * deriv d x) / d x ^ 2 :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.div hd.hasDerivAt hx).deriv
|
end Division
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Inv.lean | 178 | 184 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
|
section Map
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 123 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.PartialEquiv
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# Partial homeomorphisms
This file defines homeomorphisms between open subsets of topological spaces. An element `e` of
`PartialHomeomorph X Y` is an extension of `PartialEquiv X Y`, i.e., it is a pair of functions
`e.toFun` and `e.invFun`, inverse of each other on the sets `e.source` and `e.target`.
Additionally, we require that these sets are open, and that the functions are continuous on them.
Equivalently, they are homeomorphisms there.
As in equivs, we register a coercion to functions, and we use `e x` and `e.symm x` throughout
instead of `e.toFun x` and `e.invFun x`.
## Main definitions
* `Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph`: associating a partial homeomorphism to a homeomorphism, with
`source = target = Set.univ`;
* `PartialHomeomorph.symm`: the inverse of a partial homeomorphism
* `PartialHomeomorph.trans`: the composition of two partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.refl`: the identity partial homeomorphism
* `PartialHomeomorph.const`: a partial homeomorphism which is a constant map,
whose source and target are necessarily singleton sets
* `PartialHomeomorph.ofSet`: the identity on a set `s`
* `PartialHomeomorph.restr s`: restrict a partial homeomorphism `e` to `e.source ∩ interior s`
* `PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource`: equivalence relation describing the "right" notion of equality
for partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.prod`: the product of two partial homeomorphisms,
as a partial homeomorphism on the product space
* `PartialHomeomorph.pi`: the product of a finite family of partial homeomorphisms
* `PartialHomeomorph.disjointUnion`: combine two partial homeomorphisms with disjoint sources
and disjoint targets
* `PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding`: extend a partial homeomorphism `X → Y`
under an open embedding `X → X'`, to a partial homeomorphism `X' → Z`.
(This is used to define the disjoint union of charted spaces.)
## Implementation notes
Most statements are copied from their `PartialEquiv` versions, although some care is required
especially when restricting to subsets, as these should be open subsets.
For design notes, see `PartialEquiv.lean`.
### Local coding conventions
If a lemma deals with the intersection of a set with either source or target of a `PartialEquiv`,
then it should use `e.source ∩ s` or `e.target ∩ t`, not `s ∩ e.source` or `t ∩ e.target`.
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
variable {X X' : Type*} {Y Y' : Type*} {Z Z' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X'] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y']
[TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace Z']
/-- Partial homeomorphisms, defined on open subsets of the space -/
structure PartialHomeomorph (X : Type*) (Y : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] extends PartialEquiv X Y where
open_source : IsOpen source
open_target : IsOpen target
continuousOn_toFun : ContinuousOn toFun source
continuousOn_invFun : ContinuousOn invFun target
namespace PartialHomeomorph
variable (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y)
/-! Basic properties; inverse (symm instance) -/
section Basic
/-- Coercion of a partial homeomorphisms to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is
actually `e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`.
While we may want to switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' : X → Y := e.toFun
/-- Coercion of a `PartialHomeomorph` to function.
Note that a `PartialHomeomorph` is not `DFunLike`. -/
instance : CoeFun (PartialHomeomorph X Y) fun _ => X → Y :=
⟨fun e => e.toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse of a partial homeomorphism -/
@[symm]
protected def symm : PartialHomeomorph Y X where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquiv.symm
open_source := e.open_target
open_target := e.open_source
continuousOn_toFun := e.continuousOn_invFun
continuousOn_invFun := e.continuousOn_toFun
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : X → Y := e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : Y → X := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections PartialHomeomorph (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
protected theorem continuousOn : ContinuousOn e e.source :=
e.continuousOn_toFun
theorem continuousOn_symm : ContinuousOn e.symm e.target :=
e.continuousOn_invFun
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (a b c d) : (PartialHomeomorph.mk e a b c d : X → Y) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe_symm (e : PartialEquiv X Y) (a b c d) :
((PartialHomeomorph.mk e a b c d).symm : Y → X) = e.symm :=
rfl
theorem toPartialEquiv_injective :
Injective (toPartialEquiv : PartialHomeomorph X Y → PartialEquiv X Y)
| ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
/- Register a few simp lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts the application of a local
homeomorphism in its normal form, i.e., in terms of its coercion to a function. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : e.toFun = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem invFun_eq_coe (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe : (e.toPartialEquiv : X → Y) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe_symm : (e.toPartialEquiv.symm : Y → X) = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem map_source {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e x ∈ e.target :=
e.map_source' h
/-- Variant of `map_source`, stated for images of subsets of `source`. -/
lemma map_source'' : e '' e.source ⊆ e.target :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, hex⟩ ↦ mem_of_eq_of_mem (id hex.symm) (e.map_source' hx)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem map_target {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e.symm x ∈ e.source :=
e.map_target' h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem left_inv {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.left_inv' h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem right_inv {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.right_inv' h
theorem eq_symm_apply {x : X} {y : Y} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : y ∈ e.target) :
x = e.symm y ↔ e x = y :=
e.toPartialEquiv.eq_symm_apply hx hy
protected theorem mapsTo : MapsTo e e.source e.target := fun _ => e.map_source
protected theorem symm_mapsTo : MapsTo e.symm e.target e.source :=
e.symm.mapsTo
protected theorem leftInvOn : LeftInvOn e.symm e e.source := fun _ => e.left_inv
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn e.symm e e.target := fun _ => e.right_inv
protected theorem invOn : InvOn e.symm e e.source e.target :=
⟨e.leftInvOn, e.rightInvOn⟩
protected theorem injOn : InjOn e e.source :=
e.leftInvOn.injOn
protected theorem bijOn : BijOn e e.source e.target :=
e.invOn.bijOn e.mapsTo e.symm_mapsTo
protected theorem surjOn : SurjOn e e.source e.target :=
e.bijOn.surjOn
end Basic
/-- Interpret a `Homeomorph` as a `PartialHomeomorph` by restricting it
to an open set `s` in the domain and to `t` in the codomain. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied apply symm_apply toPartialEquiv,
simps! -isSimp source target]
def _root_.Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorphOfImageEq (e : X ≃ₜ Y) (s : Set X) (hs : IsOpen s)
(t : Set Y) (h : e '' s = t) : PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e.toPartialEquivOfImageEq s t h
open_source := hs
open_target := by simpa [← h]
continuousOn_toFun := e.continuous.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := e.symm.continuous.continuousOn
/-- A homeomorphism induces a partial homeomorphism on the whole space -/
@[simps! (config := mfld_cfg)]
def _root_.Homeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph (e : X ≃ₜ Y) : PartialHomeomorph X Y :=
e.toPartialHomeomorphOfImageEq univ isOpen_univ univ <| by rw [image_univ, e.surjective.range_eq]
/-- Replace `toPartialEquiv` field to provide better definitional equalities. -/
def replaceEquiv (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (e' : PartialEquiv X Y) (h : e.toPartialEquiv = e') :
PartialHomeomorph X Y where
toPartialEquiv := e'
open_source := h ▸ e.open_source
open_target := h ▸ e.open_target
continuousOn_toFun := h ▸ e.continuousOn_toFun
continuousOn_invFun := h ▸ e.continuousOn_invFun
theorem replaceEquiv_eq_self (e' : PartialEquiv X Y)
(h : e.toPartialEquiv = e') : e.replaceEquiv e' h = e := by
cases e
subst e'
rfl
theorem source_preimage_target : e.source ⊆ e ⁻¹' e.target :=
e.mapsTo
theorem eventually_left_inverse {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e.symm (e y) = y :=
(e.open_source.eventually_mem hx).mono e.left_inv'
theorem eventually_left_inverse' {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e.symm x), e.symm (e y) = y :=
e.eventually_left_inverse (e.map_target hx)
theorem eventually_right_inverse {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e (e.symm y) = y :=
(e.open_target.eventually_mem hx).mono e.right_inv'
theorem eventually_right_inverse' {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), e (e.symm y) = y :=
e.eventually_right_inverse (e.map_source hx)
theorem eventually_ne_nhdsWithin {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[≠] x, e x' ≠ e x :=
eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <|
(e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun x' hx' =>
mt fun h => by rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← e.left_inv hx, ← h, hx']
theorem nhdsWithin_source_inter {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set X) : 𝓝[e.source ∩ s] x = 𝓝[s] x :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| IsOpen.mem_nhds e.open_source hx)
theorem nhdsWithin_target_inter {x} (hx : x ∈ e.target) (s : Set Y) : 𝓝[e.target ∩ s] x = 𝓝[s] x :=
e.symm.nhdsWithin_source_inter hx s
theorem image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage {s : Set X} (h : s ⊆ e.source) :
e '' s = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage h
theorem image_source_inter_eq' (s : Set X) : e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_inter_eq' s
theorem image_source_inter_eq (s : Set X) :
e '' (e.source ∩ s) = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e.source ∩ s) :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_inter_eq s
theorem symm_image_eq_source_inter_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : s ⊆ e.target) :
e.symm '' s = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s :=
e.symm.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage h
theorem symm_image_target_inter_eq (s : Set Y) :
e.symm '' (e.target ∩ s) = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ s) :=
e.symm.image_source_inter_eq _
theorem source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage (s : Set X) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = e.source ∩ s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage s
theorem target_inter_inv_preimage_preimage (s : Set Y) :
e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = e.target ∩ s :=
e.symm.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage _
theorem source_inter_preimage_target_inter (s : Set Y) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ s) = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s :=
e.toPartialEquiv.source_inter_preimage_target_inter s
theorem image_source_eq_target : e '' e.source = e.target :=
e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target
theorem symm_image_target_eq_source : e.symm '' e.target = e.source :=
e.symm.image_source_eq_target
/-- Two partial homeomorphisms are equal when they have equal `toFun`, `invFun` and `source`.
It is not sufficient to have equal `toFun` and `source`, as this only determines `invFun` on
the target. This would only be true for a weaker notion of equality, arguably the right one,
called `EqOnSource`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext (e' : PartialHomeomorph X Y) (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x)
(hinv : ∀ x, e.symm x = e'.symm x) (hs : e.source = e'.source) : e = e' :=
toPartialEquiv_injective (PartialEquiv.ext h hinv hs)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_toPartialEquiv : e.symm.toPartialEquiv = e.toPartialEquiv.symm :=
rfl
-- The following lemmas are already simp via `PartialEquiv`
theorem symm_source : e.symm.source = e.target :=
rfl
theorem symm_target : e.symm.target = e.source :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective
(PartialHomeomorph.symm : PartialHomeomorph X Y → PartialHomeomorph Y X) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
/-- A partial homeomorphism is continuous at any point of its source -/
protected theorem continuousAt {x : X} (h : x ∈ e.source) : ContinuousAt e x :=
(e.continuousOn x h).continuousAt (e.open_source.mem_nhds h)
/-- A partial homeomorphism inverse is continuous at any point of its target -/
theorem continuousAt_symm {x : Y} (h : x ∈ e.target) : ContinuousAt e.symm x :=
e.symm.continuousAt h
theorem tendsto_symm {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : Tendsto e.symm (𝓝 (e x)) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, e.left_inv hx] using e.continuousAt_symm (e.map_source hx)
theorem map_nhds_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : map e (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (e x) :=
le_antisymm (e.continuousAt hx) <|
le_map_of_right_inverse (e.eventually_right_inverse' hx) (e.tendsto_symm hx)
theorem symm_map_nhds_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : map e.symm (𝓝 (e x)) = 𝓝 x :=
(e.symm.map_nhds_eq <| e.map_source hx).trans <| by rw [e.left_inv hx]
theorem image_mem_nhds {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : e '' s ∈ 𝓝 (e x) :=
e.map_nhds_eq hx ▸ Filter.image_mem_map hs
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set X) :
map e (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e x :=
calc
map e (𝓝[s] x) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] x) :=
congr_arg (map e) (e.nhdsWithin_source_inter hx _).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e x :=
(e.leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq (e.left_inv hx)
(e.continuousAt_symm (e.map_source hx)).continuousWithinAt
(e.continuousAt hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq {x} (hx : x ∈ e.source) (s : Set Y) :
map e (𝓝[e ⁻¹' s] x) = 𝓝[s] e x := by
rw [e.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, e.image_source_inter_eq', e.target_inter_inv_preimage_preimage,
e.nhdsWithin_target_inter (e.map_source hx)]
theorem eventually_nhds {x : X} (p : Y → Prop) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p (e x) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [e.map_nhds_eq hx]) eventually_map
theorem eventually_nhds' {x : X} (p : X → Prop) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (e x), p (e.symm y)) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x := by
rw [e.eventually_nhds _ hx]
refine eventually_congr ((e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun y hy => ?_)
rw [hy]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin {x : X} (p : Y → Prop) {s : Set X}
(hx : x ∈ e.source) : (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[e.symm ⁻¹' s] e x, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x, p (e x) := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ eventually_map
rw [e.map_nhdsWithin_eq hx, e.image_source_inter_eq', e.nhdsWithin_target_inter (e.mapsTo hx)]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin' {x : X} (p : X → Prop) {s : Set X}
(hx : x ∈ e.source) : (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[e.symm ⁻¹' s] e x, p (e.symm y)) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x, p x := by
rw [e.eventually_nhdsWithin _ hx]
refine eventually_congr <|
(eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds <| e.eventually_left_inverse hx).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy]
/-- This lemma is useful in the manifold library in the case that `e` is a chart. It states that
locally around `e x` the set `e.symm ⁻¹' s` is the same as the set intersected with the target
of `e` and some other neighborhood of `f x` (which will be the source of a chart on `Z`). -/
theorem preimage_eventuallyEq_target_inter_preimage_inter {e : PartialHomeomorph X Y} {s : Set X}
{t : Set Z} {x : X} {f : X → Z} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hxe : x ∈ e.source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) :
e.symm ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[𝓝 (e x)] (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) : Set Y) := by
rw [eventuallyEq_set, e.eventually_nhds _ hxe]
filter_upwards [e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe,
mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually.mp (hf.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin ht)]
intro y hy hyu
simp_rw [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_inter_iff, e.mapsTo hy, true_and, iff_self_and,
e.left_inv hy, iff_true_intro hyu]
theorem isOpen_inter_preimage {s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen (e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s) :=
e.continuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_source hs
theorem isOpen_inter_preimage_symm {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s) :=
e.symm.continuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_target hs
/-- A partial homeomorphism is an open map on its source:
the image of an open subset of the source is open. -/
lemma isOpen_image_of_subset_source {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) (hse : s ⊆ e.source) :
IsOpen (e '' s) := by
rw [(image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage (e := e) hse)]
exact e.continuousOn_invFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_target hs
/-- The image of the restriction of an open set to the source is open. -/
theorem isOpen_image_source_inter {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (e '' (e.source ∩ s)) :=
e.isOpen_image_of_subset_source (e.open_source.inter hs) inter_subset_left
/-- The inverse of a partial homeomorphism `e` is an open map on `e.target`. -/
lemma isOpen_image_symm_of_subset_target {t : Set Y} (ht : IsOpen t) (hte : t ⊆ e.target) :
IsOpen (e.symm '' t) :=
isOpen_image_of_subset_source e.symm ht (e.symm_source ▸ hte)
|
lemma isOpen_symm_image_iff_of_subset_target {t : Set Y} (hs : t ⊆ e.target) :
IsOpen (e.symm '' t) ↔ IsOpen t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ e.symm.isOpen_image_of_subset_source h hs⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/PartialHomeomorph.lean | 409 | 412 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,516 | 2,518 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Luke Mantle. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Mantle
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
/-!
# Hermite polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial.hermite n`, the `n`th probabilists' Hermite polynomial.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.hermite n`: the `n`th probabilists' Hermite polynomial,
defined recursively as a `Polynomial ℤ`
## Results
* `Polynomial.hermite_succ`: the recursion `hermite (n+1) = (x - d/dx) (hermite n)`
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_explicit`: a closed formula for (nonvanishing) coefficients in terms
of binomial coefficients and double factorials.
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_of_odd_add`: for `n`,`k` where `n+k` is odd, `(hermite n).coeff k` is
zero.
* `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_of_even_add`: a closed formula for `(hermite n).coeff k` when `n+k` is
even, equivalent to `Polynomial.coeff_hermite_explicit`.
* `Polynomial.monic_hermite`: for all `n`, `hermite n` is monic.
* `Polynomial.degree_hermite`: for all `n`, `hermite n` has degree `n`.
## References
* [Hermite Polynomials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermite_polynomials)
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
/-- the probabilists' Hermite polynomials. -/
noncomputable def hermite : ℕ → Polynomial ℤ
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * hermite n - derivative (hermite n)
/-- The recursion `hermite (n+1) = (x - d/dx) (hermite n)` -/
@[simp]
theorem hermite_succ (n : ℕ) : hermite (n + 1) = X * hermite n - derivative (hermite n) := by
rw [hermite]
theorem hermite_eq_iterate (n : ℕ) : hermite n = (fun p => X * p - derivative p)^[n] 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih => rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', ← ih, hermite_succ]
@[simp]
theorem hermite_zero : hermite 0 = C 1 :=
rfl
theorem hermite_one : hermite 1 = X := by
rw [hermite_succ, hermite_zero]
simp only [map_one, mul_one, derivative_one, sub_zero]
/-! ### Lemmas about `Polynomial.coeff` -/
section coeff
theorem coeff_hermite_succ_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (hermite (n + 1)) 0 = -coeff (hermite n) 1 := by
simp [coeff_derivative]
theorem coeff_hermite_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : coeff (hermite (n + 1)) (k + 1) =
coeff (hermite n) k - (k + 2) * coeff (hermite n) (k + 2) := by
rw [hermite_succ, coeff_sub, coeff_X_mul, coeff_derivative, mul_comm]
norm_cast
theorem coeff_hermite_of_lt {n k : ℕ} (hnk : n < k) : coeff (hermite n) k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hnk
clear hnk
induction n generalizing k with
| zero => exact coeff_C
| succ n ih =>
have : n + k + 1 + 2 = n + (k + 2) + 1 := by ring
rw [coeff_hermite_succ_succ, add_right_comm, this, ih k, ih (k + 2), mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_hermite_self (n : ℕ) : coeff (hermite n) n = 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => exact coeff_C
| | succ n ih =>
rw [coeff_hermite_succ_succ, ih, coeff_hermite_of_lt, mul_zero, sub_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem degree_hermite (n : ℕ) : (hermite n).degree = n := by
rw [degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero]
· simp_rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Hermite/Basic.lean | 92 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Support
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Jacobian
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
/-!
# Links between an integral and its "improper" version
In its current state, mathlib only knows how to talk about definite ("proper") integrals,
in the sense that it treats integrals over `[x, +∞)` the same as it treats integrals over
`[y, z]`. For example, the integral over `[1, +∞)` is **not** defined to be the limit of
the integral over `[1, x]` as `x` tends to `+∞`, which is known as an **improper integral**.
Indeed, the "proper" definition is stronger than the "improper" one. The usual counterexample
is `x ↦ sin(x)/x`, which has an improper integral over `[1, +∞)` but no definite integral.
Although definite integrals have better properties, they are hardly usable when it comes to
computing integrals on unbounded sets, which is much easier using limits. Thus, in this file,
we prove various ways of studying the proper integral by studying the improper one.
## Definitions
The main definition of this file is `MeasureTheory.AECover`. It is a rather technical definition
whose sole purpose is generalizing and factoring proofs. Given an index type `ι`, a countably
generated filter `l` over `ι`, and an `ι`-indexed family `φ` of subsets of a measurable space `α`
equipped with a measure `μ`, one should think of a hypothesis `hφ : MeasureTheory.AECover μ l φ` as
a sufficient condition for being able to interpret `∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x
in φ i, f x ∂μ` as `i` tends to `l`.
When using this definition with a measure restricted to a set `s`, which happens fairly often, one
should not try too hard to use a `MeasureTheory.AECover` of subsets of `s`, as it often makes proofs
more complicated than necessary. See for example the proof of
`MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto` where we use `(fun x ↦ oi x)` as a
`MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. `μ.restrict (Iic b)`, instead of using `(fun x ↦ Ioc x b)`.
## Main statements
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is a measurable
`ENNReal`-valued function, then `∫⁻ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, if `f` is measurable and
integrable on each `φ n`, and if `∫ x in φ n, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` tends to some `I : ℝ` as n tends to `l`,
then `f` is integrable
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is measurable
and integrable (globally), then `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `+∞`.
We then specialize these lemmas to various use cases involving intervals, which are frequent
in analysis. In particular,
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` is a version of FTC-2 on the interval
`(a, +∞)`, giving the formula `∫ x in (a, +∞), g' x = l - g a` if `g'` is integrable and
`g` tends to `l` at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg` gives the same result assuming that
`g'` is nonnegative instead of integrable. Its automatic integrability in this context is proved
in `MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi` is a version of the change of variables formula
on semi-infinite intervals.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that a function whose
derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` has a limit at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that an integrable function
whose derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` tends to `0` at `+∞`.
Versions of these results are also given on the intervals `(-∞, a]` and `(-∞, +∞)`, as well as
the corresponding versions of integration by parts.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section AECover
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter ι)
/-- A sequence `φ` of subsets of `α` is a `MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. a measure `μ` and a filter
`l` if almost every point (w.r.t. `μ`) of `α` eventually belongs to `φ n` (w.r.t. `l`), and if
each `φ n` is measurable. This definition is a technical way to avoid duplicating a lot of
proofs. It should be thought of as a sufficient condition for being able to interpret
`∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`.
See for example `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`,
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` and
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
structure AECover (φ : ι → Set α) : Prop where
ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ i in l, x ∈ φ i
protected measurableSet : ∀ i, MeasurableSet <| φ i
variable {μ} {l}
namespace AECover
/-!
## Operations on `AECover`s
-/
/-- Elementwise intersection of two `AECover`s is an `AECover`. -/
theorem inter {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hψ : AECover μ l ψ) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ φ i ∩ ψ i) where
ae_eventually_mem := hψ.1.mp <| hφ.1.mono fun _ ↦ Eventually.and
measurableSet _ := (hφ.2 _).inter (hψ.2 _)
theorem superset {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hsub : ∀ i, φ i ⊆ ψ i)
(hmeas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (ψ i)) : AECover μ l ψ :=
⟨hφ.1.mono fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono fun i hi ↦ hsub i hi, hmeas⟩
theorem mono_ac {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := ⟨hle hφ.1, hφ.2⟩
theorem mono {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := hφ.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
end AECover
section MetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
theorem aecover_ball {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.ball x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
theorem aecover_closedBall {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.closedBall x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isClosed_closedBall.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ici_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
end MetricSpace
section Preorderα
variable [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α}
theorem aecover_Ici (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) : AECover μ l fun i => Ici (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_le_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ici
theorem aecover_Iic (hb : Tendsto b l atTop) : AECover μ l fun i => Iic <| b i :=
aecover_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
theorem aecover_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop) :
AECover μ l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
end Preorderα
section LinearOrderα
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_lt_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Iio (b i) := aecover_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha hb
theorem aecover_Ioo [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
theorem aecover_Ioc [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
theorem aecover_Ico [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
end LinearOrderα
section FiniteIntervals
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} {A B : α} (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B))
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioi).mono fun _x hx ↦ ha.eventually <|
eventually_lt_nhds hx
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iio : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iio (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ici : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ici (a i) :=
(aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ici
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iic : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iic (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
((aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self le_rfl).inter
((aecover_Iio_of_Iio hb).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self le_rfl)
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Icc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Icc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Icc
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ico : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ico_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ico
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ioc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ioc
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
end FiniteIntervals
protected theorem AECover.restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α} :
AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ :=
hφ.mono Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp {s : Set α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ n in l, x ∈ φ n)
(measurable : ∀ n, MeasurableSet <| φ n) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ where
ae_eventually_mem := by rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
measurableSet := measurable
theorem AECover.inter_restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l fun i => φ i ∩ s :=
aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp hs
(hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.mono fun _i hi => ⟨hi, hxs⟩) fun i =>
(hφ.measurableSet i).inter hs
theorem AECover.ae_tendsto_indicator {β : Type*} [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => (φ i).indicator f x) l (𝓝 <| f x) :=
hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx =>
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| hx.mono fun _n hn => (indicator_of_mem hn _).symm
theorem AECover.aemeasurable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot]
{f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aemeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using
mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
theorem AECover.aestronglyMeasurable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot] {f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
end AECover
theorem AECover.comp_tendsto {α ι ι' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
{l' : Filter ι'} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {u : ι' → ι} (hu : Tendsto u l' l) :
AECover μ l' (φ ∘ u) where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx => hu.eventually hx
measurableSet i := hφ.measurableSet (u i)
section AECoverUnionInterCountable
variable {α ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
theorem AECover.biUnion_Iic_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) :
AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋃ (k) (_h : k ∈ Iic n), φ k :=
hφ.superset (fun _ ↦ subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic) fun _ ↦ .biUnion (to_countable _)
fun _ _ ↦ (hφ.2 _)
theorem AECover.biInter_Ici_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) : AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋂ (k) (_h : k ∈ Ici n), φ k where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun x h ↦ by
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, eventually_forall_ge_atTop]
measurableSet _ := .biInter (to_countable _) fun n _ => hφ.measurableSet n
end AECoverUnionInterCountable
section Lintegral
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
private theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ)
(hmono : Monotone φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
let F n := (φ n).indicator f
have key₁ : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ := fun n => hfm.indicator (hφ.measurableSet n)
have key₂ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Monotone fun n => F n x := ae_of_all _ fun x _i _j hij =>
indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (hmono hij) (fun x => zero_le <| f x) x
have key₃ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f
(lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone key₁ key₂ key₃).congr fun n =>
lintegral_indicator (hφ.measurableSet n) _
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto (∫⁻ x in φ ·, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) := by
have lim₁ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biInter_Ici_aecover
(fun i j hij => biInter_subset_biInter_left (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr hij)) hfm
have lim₂ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biUnion_Iic_aecover
(fun i j hij => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr hij)) hfm
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le lim₁ lim₂ (fun n ↦ ?_) fun n ↦ ?_
exacts [lintegral_mono_set (biInter_subset_of_mem left_mem_Ici),
lintegral_mono_set (subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic)]
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
tendsto_of_seq_tendsto fun _u hu => (hφ.comp_tendsto hu).lintegral_tendsto_of_nat hfm
theorem AECover.lintegral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (I : ℝ≥0∞) (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm) htendsto
theorem AECover.iSup_lintegral_eq_of_countably_generated [Nonempty ι] [l.NeBot]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : ⨆ i : ι, ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
have := hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm
refine ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
(fun i => lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl) fun w hw => ?_
exact (this.eventually_const_lt hw).exists
end Lintegral
section Integrable
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal I) : Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨hfm, (le_of_tendsto ?_ hbounded).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top⟩
exact hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm.enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| .ofReal I)) :
Integrable f μ := by
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded (max 1 (I + 1)) hfm ?_
refine htendsto.eventually (ge_mem_nhds ?_)
refine (ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (lt_max_of_lt_left zero_lt_one)).2 ?_
exact lt_max_of_lt_right (lt_add_one I)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using hbounded)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded' :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using htendsto)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto' :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hφ.aestronglyMeasurable fun i => (hfi i).aestronglyMeasurable
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded I hfm ?_
conv at hbounded in integral _ _ =>
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x => @norm_nonneg E _ (f x))
hfm.norm.restrict]
conv at hbounded in ENNReal.ofReal _ =>
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
refine hbounded.mono fun i hi => ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal <| ne_top_of_lt <| hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp (hfi i).2]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hi
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I' hfi hI'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi <| hbounded.mono fun _i hi =>
(integral_congr_ae <| ae_restrict_of_ae <| hnng.mono fun _ => Real.norm_of_nonneg).le.trans hi
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae I' hfi hnng hI'
end Integrable
section Integral
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
suffices h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x : α, (φ i).indicator f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x : α, f x ∂μ)) from by
convert h using 2; rw [integral_indicator (hφ.measurableSet _)]
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => ‖f x‖)
(Eventually.of_forall fun i => hfi.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator <| hφ.measurableSet i)
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => ae_of_all _ fun _ => norm_indicator_le_norm_self _ _) hfi.norm
(hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f)
/-- Slight reformulation of
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : E) (hfi : Integrable f μ)
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi) h
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hnng : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfi : ∀ n, IntegrableOn f (φ n) μ) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
have hfi' : Integrable f μ := hφ.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae I hfi hnng htendsto
hφ.integral_eq_of_tendsto I hfi' htendsto
end Integral
section IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot l] [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hφ : AECover μ l _ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi ht
rwa [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)]
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) (b i)`,
where `a i` tends to -∞ and `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, ∞) -/
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' hfi ha hb hI'
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l _ := aecover_Ioi ha
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioi (a i)) (μ.restrict <| Iic b) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact id
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) b`,
where `a i` tends to -∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, b) -/
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' b hfi ha hI'
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l _ := aecover_Iic hb
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Iic (b i)) (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i), inter_comm]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
exact id
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc a (b i)`,
where `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (a, ∞) -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| I)) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' a hfi hb hI'
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded {I a₀ b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) (b i)) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b₀) := by
refine (aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc ha hb).integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I
(fun i => (hfi i).restrict) (h.mono fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict measurableSet_Ioc]
refine le_trans (setIntegral_mono_set (hfi i).norm ?_ ?_) hi <;> apply ae_of_all
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, forall_const]
· intro c hc; exact hc.1
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_left {I a₀ b : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) b) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) b, ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi ha tendsto_const_nhds h
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_right {I a b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc a (b i)) (hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc a (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b₀) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi tendsto_const_nhds hb h
end IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
section IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (hfi : Integrable f μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioc (a i) (b i)
have hφ : AECover μ l φ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi
exact (intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)).symm
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic (b : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ)
(ha : Tendsto a l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioi (a i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l φ := aecover_Ioi ha
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot <| b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
rfl
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi (a : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Ioi a, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Iic (b i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l φ := aecover_Iic hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop <| a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
rfl
end IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
open Real
open scoped Interval
section IoiFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {a l : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `+∞`, then
the function has a limit at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
suffices CauchySeq f from cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete this
apply Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.2 (fun ε εpos ↦ ?_)
have A : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ici ↑n, ‖f' x‖ < ε := by
have L : Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ∫ x in Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖) atTop
(𝓝 (∫ x in ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖)) := by
apply tendsto_setIntegral_of_antitone (fun n ↦ measurableSet_Ici)
· intro m n hmn
exact Ici_subset_Ici.2 (Nat.cast_le.mpr hmn)
· rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hn)⟩
have B : ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ) = ∅ := by
apply eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x ↦ ?_)
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, not_forall, not_le] using exists_nat_gt x
simp only [B, Measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure] at L
exact (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ εpos
have B : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, a < n := by
rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop n] with m (hm : n < m) using hn.trans (Nat.cast_lt.mpr hm)
rcases (A.and B).exists with ⟨N, hN, h'N⟩
refine ⟨N, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist (f x) (f ↑N)
= ‖f x - f N‖ := dist_eq_norm _ _
_ = ‖∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, f' t‖ := by
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hx, intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt]
· intro y hy
simp only [hx, uIcc_of_le, mem_Icc] at hy
exact hderiv _ (h'N.trans_le hy.1)
· rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono_set (Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h'N.le))
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, ‖f' t‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm fun a ↦ f' a
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ici ↑N, ‖f' t‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set
· apply IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 h'N)
· filter_upwards with x using norm_nonneg _
· have : Ioc (↑N) x ⊆ Ici ↑N := Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans Ioi_subset_Ici_self
exact this.eventuallyLE
_ < ε := hN
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(a, +∞)`, then the function tends to zero
at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atTop (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atTop := by exact ⟨Ioi a, Ioi_mem_atTop _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [← top_le_iff, ← volume_Ici (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← IsEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.isUniformEmbedding_coe E).isEmbedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a))
(hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
symm
apply
intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.1) le_rfl
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) :
∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
refine integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- A special case of `integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Ioi_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Ioi b, deriv f x = - f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Ioi b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, zero_sub]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atTop_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn g (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (l - g a) a (fun x => ?_) tendsto_id ?_
· exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hg.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
calc
g x - g a = ∫ y in a..id x, g' y := by
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
_ = ∫ y in a..id x, ‖g' y‖ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le h'x]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun y hy => ?_
dsimp
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact g'pos _ hy.1
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le) g'pos hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont hderiv g'pos hg) hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' hderiv g'pos hg)
hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
apply integrable_neg_iff.1
exact integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont.neg (fun x hx => (hderiv x hx).neg)
(fun x hx => neg_nonneg_of_nonpos (g'neg x hx)) hg.neg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos ?_ (fun x hx ↦ hderiv x hx.out.le) g'neg hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos hcont hderiv g'neg hg) hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' hderiv g'neg hg)
hg
end IoiFTC
section IicFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {a : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `-∞`, then
the function has a limit at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
let g := f ∘ (fun x ↦ -x)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi (-a), HasDerivAt g (-f' (-x)) x := by
intro x hx
have : -x ∈ Iic a := by simp only [mem_Iic, mem_Ioi, neg_le] at *; exact hx.le
simpa using HasDerivAt.scomp x (hderiv (-x) this) (hasDerivAt_neg' x)
have L : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi hdg
exact ((MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage (Measure.measurePreserving_neg _)
(Homeomorph.neg ℝ).measurableEmbedding).2 f'int.neg).mono_set (by simp)
refine ⟨limUnder atTop g, ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x ↦ g (-x)) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := L.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
simpa [g] using this
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(-∞, a]`, then the function tends to zero
at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atBot (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atBot := by exact ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atBot_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
apply le_antisymm (le_top)
rw [← volume_Iic (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← IsEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.isUniformEmbedding_coe E).isEmbedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a)` and continuity at `a⁻`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Iic a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.const_sub _)
filter_upwards [Iic_mem_atBot a] with x hx
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hx
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Iic_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.2
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.2) le_rfl
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a]`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto'
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
refine integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a right_mem_Iic).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- A special case of `integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Iic_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Iic b, deriv f x = f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Iio b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, sub_zero]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atBot_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
open UniformSpace in
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
{f : ℝ → F} (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) (x : ℝ) :
‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ∫⁻ y in Iic x, ‖deriv f y‖ₑ := by
let I : F →L[ℝ] Completion F := Completion.toComplL
let f' : ℝ → Completion F := I ∘ f
have hf' : ContDiff ℝ 1 f' := hf.continuousLinearMap_comp I
have h'f' : HasCompactSupport f' := h'f.comp_left rfl
have : ‖f' x‖ₑ ≤ ∫⁻ y in Iic x, ‖deriv f' y‖ₑ := by
rw [← HasCompactSupport.integral_Iic_deriv_eq hf' h'f' x]
exact enorm_integral_le_lintegral_enorm _
convert this with y
· simp [f', I, Completion.enorm_coe]
· rw [fderiv_comp_deriv _ I.differentiableAt (hf.differentiable le_rfl _)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.fderiv]
simp [I]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.ennnorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv :=
HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv
end IicFTC
section UnivFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {m n : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on the whole real line
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞` and `n` at `+∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative is `n - m`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at `-∞` and `+∞`,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic` and
`tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f')
(hbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) (htop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 n)) : ∫ x, f' x = n - m := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, ← Set.Iic_union_Ioi (a := 0),
setIntegral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl) measurableSet_Ioi hf'.integrableOn hf'.integrableOn,
integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn hbot,
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn htop]
abel
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on the real line, then the integral of the
derivative is zero. -/
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrable
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f') (hf : Integrable f) :
∫ x, f' x = 0 := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE]
have A : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
have B : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
simpa using integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hderiv hf' A B
end UnivFTC
section IoiChangeVariables
open Real
open scoped Interval
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of vector-valued functions, proved by taking
limits from the result for finite intervals. -/
theorem integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → E} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have eq : ∀ b : ℝ, a < b → (∫ x in a..b, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in f a..f b, g u := fun b hb ↦ by
have i1 : Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ⊆ Ioi a := by
rw [min_eq_left hb.le]
exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
have i2 : [[a, b]] ⊆ Ici a := by rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
refine
intervalIntegral.integral_comp_smul_deriv''' (hf.mono i2)
(fun x hx => hff' x <| mem_of_mem_of_subset hx i1) (hg_cont.mono <| image_subset _ ?_)
(hg1.mono_set <| image_subset _ ?_) (hg2.mono_set i2)
· rw [min_eq_left hb.le]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
· rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
rw [integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi] at hg2
have t2 := intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ hg2 tendsto_id
have : Ioi (f a) ⊆ f '' Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <|
IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici isPreconnected_Ici left_mem_Ici
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| Ici_mem_atTop _) hf hft
have t1 := (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ (hg1.mono_set this) tendsto_id).comp hft
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop a) eq) t2) t1
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of scalar-valued functions -/
theorem integral_comp_mul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => (g ∘ f) x * f' x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, (g ∘ f) x * f' x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have hg2' : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hg2
simpa [mul_comm] using integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi hf hft hff' hg_cont hg1 hg2'
/-- Substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` -/
theorem integral_comp_rpow_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in Ioi 0, (|p| * x ^ (p - 1)) • g (x ^ p)) = ∫ y in Ioi 0, g y := by
let S := Ioi (0 : ℝ)
have a1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ S → HasDerivWithinAt (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) S x :=
fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')).hasDerivWithinAt
have a2 : InjOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) S := by
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hp with (h | h)
· apply StrictAntiOn.injOn
intro x hx y hy hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ (rpow_pos_of_pos hx p) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy p), ← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx),
← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy)]
exact rpow_lt_rpow (le_of_lt hx) hxy (neg_pos.mpr h)
exact StrictMonoOn.injOn fun x hx y _ hxy => rpow_lt_rpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le hxy h
have a3 : (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) '' S = S := by
ext1 x; rw [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact rpow_pos_of_pos hy p
· intro hx; refine ⟨x ^ (1 / p), rpow_pos_of_pos hx _, ?_⟩
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), one_div_mul_cancel hp, rpow_one]
have := integral_image_eq_integral_abs_deriv_smul measurableSet_Ioi a1 a2 g
rw [a3] at this; rw [this]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _)]
theorem integral_comp_rpow_Ioi_of_pos {g : ℝ → E} {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) :
(∫ x in Ioi 0, (p * x ^ (p - 1)) • g (x ^ p)) = ∫ y in Ioi 0, g y := by
convert integral_comp_rpow_Ioi g hp.ne'
rw [abs_of_nonneg hp.le]
theorem integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) (a : ℝ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, g (b * x)) = b⁻¹ • ∫ x in Ioi (b * a), g x := by
have : ∀ c : ℝ, MeasurableSet (Ioi c) := fun c => measurableSet_Ioi
rw [← integral_indicator (this a), ← integral_indicator (this (b * a)),
← abs_of_pos (inv_pos.mpr hb), ← Measure.integral_comp_mul_left]
congr
ext1 x
rw [← indicator_comp_right, preimage_const_mul_Ioi _ hb, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hb.ne']
rfl
theorem integral_comp_mul_right_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) (a : ℝ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, g (x * b)) = b⁻¹ • ∫ x in Ioi (a * b), g x := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi g a hb
end IoiChangeVariables
section IoiIntegrability
open Real
open scoped Interval
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- The substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` preserves integrability. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (|p| * x ^ (p - 1)) • f (x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) := by
let S := Ioi (0 : ℝ)
have a1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ S → HasDerivWithinAt (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) S x :=
fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')).hasDerivWithinAt
have a2 : InjOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) S := by
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hp with (h | h)
| · apply StrictAntiOn.injOn
intro x hx y hy hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ (rpow_pos_of_pos hx p) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy p), ← rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), ←
rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy)]
exact rpow_lt_rpow (le_of_lt hx) hxy (neg_pos.mpr h)
exact StrictMonoOn.injOn fun x hx y _hy hxy => rpow_lt_rpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le hxy h
have a3 : (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) '' S = S := by
ext1 x; rw [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩; exact rpow_pos_of_pos hy p
· intro hx; refine ⟨x ^ (1 / p), rpow_pos_of_pos hx _, ?_⟩
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), one_div_mul_cancel hp, rpow_one]
have := integrableOn_image_iff_integrableOn_abs_deriv_smul measurableSet_Ioi a1 a2 f
rw [a3] at this
rw [this]
refine integrableOn_congr_fun (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioi
simp_rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _)]
/-- The substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` preserves integrability (version
without `|p|` factor) -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff' [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => x ^ (p - 1) • f (x ^ p)) (Ioi 0) ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) := by
simpa only [← integrableOn_Ioi_comp_rpow_iff f hp, mul_smul] using
(integrable_smul_iff (abs_pos.mpr hp).ne' _).symm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegralEqImproper.lean | 1,132 | 1,154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 George Peter Banyard, Yaël Dillies, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: George Peter Banyard, Yaël Dillies, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Metric
/-!
# Graph products
This file defines the box product of graphs and other product constructions. The box product of `G`
and `H` is the graph on the product of the vertices such that `x` and `y` are related iff they agree
on one component and the other one is related via either `G` or `H`. For example, the box product of
two edges is a square.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.boxProd`: The box product.
## Notation
* `G □ H`: The box product of `G` and `H`.
## TODO
Define all other graph products!
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph α} {H : SimpleGraph β}
/-- Box product of simple graphs. It relates `(a₁, b)` and `(a₂, b)` if `G` relates `a₁` and `a₂`,
and `(a, b₁)` and `(a, b₂)` if `H` relates `b₁` and `b₂`. -/
def boxProd (G : SimpleGraph α) (H : SimpleGraph β) : SimpleGraph (α × β) where
Adj x y := G.Adj x.1 y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ H.Adj x.2 y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1
symm x y := by simp [and_comm, or_comm, eq_comm, adj_comm]
loopless x := by simp
/-- Box product of simple graphs. It relates `(a₁, b)` and `(a₂, b)` if `G` relates `a₁` and `a₂`,
and `(a, b₁)` and `(a, b₂)` if `H` relates `b₁` and `b₂`. -/
infixl:70 " □ " => boxProd
@[simp]
theorem boxProd_adj {x y : α × β} :
(G □ H).Adj x y ↔ G.Adj x.1 y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ H.Adj x.2 y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem boxProd_adj_left {a₁ : α} {b : β} {a₂ : α} :
(G □ H).Adj (a₁, b) (a₂, b) ↔ G.Adj a₁ a₂ := by
simp only [boxProd_adj, and_true, SimpleGraph.irrefl, false_and, or_false]
theorem boxProd_adj_right {a : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} : (G □ H).Adj (a, b₁) (a, b₂) ↔ H.Adj b₁ b₂ := by
simp only [boxProd_adj, SimpleGraph.irrefl, false_and, and_true, false_or]
theorem boxProd_neighborSet (x : α × β) :
(G □ H).neighborSet x = G.neighborSet x.1 ×ˢ {x.2} ∪ {x.1} ×ˢ H.neighborSet x.2 := by
ext ⟨a', b'⟩
simp only [mem_neighborSet, Set.mem_union, boxProd_adj, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
simp only [eq_comm, and_comm]
variable (G H)
/-- The box product is commutative up to isomorphism. `Equiv.prodComm` as a graph isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def boxProdComm : G □ H ≃g H □ G := ⟨Equiv.prodComm _ _, or_comm⟩
/-- The box product is associative up to isomorphism. `Equiv.prodAssoc` as a graph isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def boxProdAssoc (I : SimpleGraph γ) : G □ H □ I ≃g G □ (H □ I) :=
⟨Equiv.prodAssoc _ _ _, fun {x y} => by
simp only [boxProd_adj, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, or_and_right, or_assoc, Prod.ext_iff,
and_assoc, @and_comm (x.fst.fst = _)]⟩
/-- The embedding of `G` into `G □ H` given by `b`. -/
@[simps]
def boxProdLeft (b : β) : G ↪g G □ H where
toFun a := (a, b)
inj' _ _ := congr_arg Prod.fst
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := boxProd_adj_left
/-- The embedding of `H` into `G □ H` given by `a`. -/
@[simps]
def boxProdRight (a : α) : H ↪g G □ H where
toFun := Prod.mk a
inj' _ _ := congr_arg Prod.snd
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := boxProd_adj_right
namespace Walk
variable {G}
/-- Turn a walk on `G` into a walk on `G □ H`. -/
protected def boxProdLeft {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : β) : G.Walk a₁ a₂ → (G □ H).Walk (a₁, b) (a₂, b) :=
Walk.map (G.boxProdLeft H b).toHom
variable (G) {H}
/-- Turn a walk on `H` into a walk on `G □ H`. -/
protected def boxProdRight {b₁ b₂ : β} (a : α) : H.Walk b₁ b₂ → (G □ H).Walk (a, b₁) (a, b₂) :=
Walk.map (G.boxProdRight H a).toHom
variable {G}
/-- Project a walk on `G □ H` to a walk on `G` by discarding the moves in the direction of `H`. -/
def ofBoxProdLeft [DecidableEq β] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {x y : α × β} :
(G □ H).Walk x y → G.Walk x.1 y.1
| nil => nil
| cons h w =>
Or.by_cases h
(fun hG => w.ofBoxProdLeft.cons hG.1)
(fun hH => hH.2 ▸ w.ofBoxProdLeft)
/-- Project a walk on `G □ H` to a walk on `H` by discarding the moves in the direction of `G`. -/
def ofBoxProdRight [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel H.Adj] {x y : α × β} :
(G □ H).Walk x y → H.Walk x.2 y.2
| nil => nil
| cons h w =>
(Or.symm h).by_cases
(fun hH => w.ofBoxProdRight.cons hH.1)
(fun hG => hG.2 ▸ w.ofBoxProdRight)
@[simp]
theorem ofBoxProdLeft_boxProdLeft [DecidableEq β] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} :
∀ (w : G.Walk a₁ a₂), (w.boxProdLeft H b).ofBoxProdLeft = w
| nil => rfl
| cons' x y z h w => by
rw [Walk.boxProdLeft, map_cons, ofBoxProdLeft, Or.by_cases, dif_pos, ← Walk.boxProdLeft]
· simp [ofBoxProdLeft_boxProdLeft]
· exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofBoxProdLeft_boxProdRight [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {a b₁ b₂ : α} :
∀ (w : G.Walk b₁ b₂), (w.boxProdRight G a).ofBoxProdRight = w
| nil => rfl
| cons' x y z h w => by
rw [Walk.boxProdRight, map_cons, ofBoxProdRight, Or.by_cases, dif_pos, ←
Walk.boxProdRight]
· simp [ofBoxProdLeft_boxProdRight]
· exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
lemma length_boxProd {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
[DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj] (w : (G □ H).Walk (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)) :
w.length = w.ofBoxProdLeft.length + w.ofBoxProdRight.length := by
match w with
| | .nil => simp [ofBoxProdLeft, ofBoxProdRight]
| .cons x w' => next c =>
unfold ofBoxProdLeft ofBoxProdRight
rw [length_cons, length_boxProd w']
have disj : (G.Adj a₁ c.1 ∧ b₁ = c.2) ∨ (H.Adj b₁ c.2 ∧ a₁ = c.1) := by aesop
rcases disj with h₁ | h₂
· simp only [h₁, irrefl, false_and, and_self, ↓reduceDIte, length_cons, Or.by_cases]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Prod.lean | 149 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convolution
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.EulerSineProd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
/-!
# The Beta function, and further properties of the Gamma function
In this file we define the Beta integral, relate Beta and Gamma functions, and prove some
refined properties of the Gamma function using these relations.
## Results on the Beta function
* `Complex.betaIntegral`: the Beta function `Β(u, v)`, where `u`, `v` are complex with positive
real part.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`: the formula
`Gamma u * Gamma v = Gamma (u + v) * betaIntegral u v`.
## Results on the Gamma function
* `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}` we have `Γ s ≠ 0`.
* `Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`: for all `s`, the limit as `n → ∞` of the sequence
`n ↦ n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))` is `Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`: Euler's reflection formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (1 - s) = π / sin π s`.
* `Complex.differentiable_one_div_Gamma`: the function `1 / Γ(s)` is differentiable everywhere.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: Legendre's duplication formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (s + 1 / 2) = Gamma (2 * s) * 2 ^ (1 - 2 * s) * √π`.
* `Real.Gamma_ne_zero`, `Real.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`,
`Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`, `Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: real versions of the above.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat Topology Real
section BetaIntegral
/-! ## The Beta function -/
namespace Complex
/-- The Beta function `Β (u, v)`, defined as `∫ x:ℝ in 0..1, x ^ (u - 1) * (1 - x) ^ (v - 1)`. -/
noncomputable def betaIntegral (u v : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `betaIntegral_convergent`, showing convergence at the left endpoint. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent_left {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (v : ℂ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 (1 / 2) := by
apply IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2)] at hx
apply ContinuousAt.cpow
· exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
· exact continuousAt_const
· norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| by linarith only [hx.2]
/-- The Beta integral is convergent for all `u, v` of positive real part. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 1 := by
refine (betaIntegral_convergent_left hu v).trans ?_
rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg]
convert ((betaIntegral_convergent_left hv u).comp_add_right 1).symm using 1
· ext1 x
conv_lhs => rw [mul_comm]
congr 2 <;> · push_cast; ring
· norm_num
· norm_num
theorem betaIntegral_symm (u v : ℂ) : betaIntegral v u = betaIntegral u v := by
rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_add (a := 0) (b := 1) (c := -1)
(fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) neg_one_lt_zero.ne 1
rw [inv_neg, inv_one, neg_one_smul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_symm] at this
simp? at this says
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_add, ofReal_neg, ofReal_one, sub_add_cancel_right, neg_neg,
mul_one, neg_add_cancel, mul_zero, zero_add] at this
conv_lhs at this => arg 1; intro x; rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
exact this
theorem betaIntegral_eval_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) : betaIntegral u 1 = 1 / u := by
simp_rw [betaIntegral, sub_self, cpow_zero, mul_one]
rw [integral_cpow (Or.inl _)]
· rw [ofReal_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, zero_cpow, sub_zero, sub_add_cancel]
rw [sub_add_cancel]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
· rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← sub_pos, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem betaIntegral_scaled (s t : ℂ) {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
∫ x in (0)..a, (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * ((a : ℂ) - x) ^ (t - 1) =
(a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) * betaIntegral s t := by
have ha' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha.ne'
rw [betaIntegral]
have A : (a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) = a * ((a : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (a : ℂ) ^ (t - 1)) := by
rw [(by abel : s + t - 1 = 1 + (s - 1) + (t - 1)), cpow_add _ _ ha', cpow_add 1 _ ha', cpow_one,
mul_assoc]
rw [A, mul_assoc, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, ← real_smul, ← zero_div a, ←
div_self ha.ne', ← intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div _ ha.ne', zero_div]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le ha.le]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
congr 1
· rw [← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (div_pos hx.1 ha).le, ofReal_div, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
· rw [(by norm_cast : (1 : ℂ) - ↑(x / a) = ↑(1 - x / a)), ←
mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (sub_nonneg.mpr <| (div_le_one ha).mpr hx.2)]
push_cast
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
/-- Relation between Beta integral and Gamma function. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral {s t : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) (ht : 0 < re t) :
Gamma s * Gamma t = Gamma (s + t) * betaIntegral s t := by
-- Note that we haven't proved (yet) that the Gamma function has no zeroes, so we can't formulate
-- this as a formula for the Beta function.
have conv_int := integral_posConvolution
(GammaIntegral_convergent hs) (GammaIntegral_convergent ht) (ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℂ)
simp_rw [ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply'] at conv_int
have hst : 0 < re (s + t) := by rw [add_re]; exact add_pos hs ht
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs, Gamma_eq_integral ht, Gamma_eq_integral hst, GammaIntegral,
| GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← conv_int, ← MeasureTheory.integral_mul_const (betaIntegral _ _)]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_assoc, ← betaIntegral_scaled s t hx, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
congr 1 with y : 1
push_cast
suffices Complex.exp (-x) = Complex.exp (-y) * Complex.exp (-(x - y)) by rw [this]; ring
rw [← Complex.exp_add]; congr 1; abel
/-- Recurrence formula for the Beta function. -/
theorem betaIntegral_recurrence {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
u * betaIntegral u (v + 1) = v * betaIntegral (u + 1) v := by
-- NB: If we knew `Gamma (u + v + 1) ≠ 0` this would be an easy consequence of
-- `Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`; but we don't know that yet. We will prove it later, but
-- this lemma is needed in the proof. So we give a (somewhat laborious) direct argument.
let F : ℝ → ℂ := fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ u * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ v
have hu' : 0 < re (u + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean | 136 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Cardinality
/-!
# Finite and free modules
We provide some instances for finite and free modules.
## Main results
* `Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex.fintype` : If a free module is finite, then any basis is finite.
* `Module.Finite.of_basis` : A free module with a basis indexed by a `Fintype` is finite.
-/
universe u v w
/-- If a free module is finite, then the arbitrary basis is finite. -/
noncomputable instance Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex.fintype (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] :
Fintype (Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex R M) := by
refine @Fintype.ofFinite _ ?_
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· have := Module.subsingleton R M
rw [ChooseBasisIndex]
infer_instance
· exact Module.Finite.finite_basis (chooseBasis _ _)
/-- A free module with a basis indexed by a `Fintype` is finite. -/
theorem Module.Finite.of_basis {R M ι : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[_root_.Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) : Module.Finite R M := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
refine ⟨⟨Finset.univ.image b, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [Set.image_univ, Finset.coe_univ, Finset.coe_image, Basis.span_eq]
instance Module.Finite.matrix {R ι₁ ι₂ M : Type*}
[Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
[_root_.Finite ι₁] [_root_.Finite ι₂] :
Module.Finite R (Matrix ι₁ ι₂ M) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι₁
cases nonempty_fintype ι₂
exact Module.Finite.of_basis <| (Free.chooseBasis _ _).matrix _ _
example {ι₁ ι₂ R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Finite ι₁] [Finite ι₂] :
Module.Finite R (Matrix ι₁ ι₂ R) := inferInstance
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FreeModule/Finite/Basic.lean | 53 | 58 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_five : cos (π / 5) = (1 + √5) / 4 := by
set c := cos (π / 5)
have : 4 * (c * c) + (-2) * c + (-1) = 0 := by
rw [← sq, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
have hd : discrim 4 (-2) (-1) = (2 * √5) * (2 * √5) := by norm_num [discrim, mul_mul_mul_comm]
rcases (quadratic_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num) hd c).mp this with h | h
· field_simp [h]; linarith
· absurd (show 0 ≤ c from cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos.le])
rw [not_le, h]
exact div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (by norm_num [lt_sqrt]) (by positivity)
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff₀ (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_pos zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
| convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 977 | 981 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Constructions
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Bases of topologies. Countability axioms.
A topological basis on a topological space `t` is a collection of sets,
such that all open sets can be generated as unions of these sets, without the need to take
finite intersections of them. This file introduces a framework for dealing with these collections,
and also what more we can say under certain countability conditions on bases,
which are referred to as first- and second-countable.
We also briefly cover the theory of separable spaces, which are those with a countable, dense
subset. If a space is second-countable, and also has a countably generated uniformity filter
(for example, if `t` is a metric space), it will automatically be separable (and indeed, these
conditions are equivalent in this case).
## Main definitions
* `TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis s`: The topological space `t` has basis `s`.
* `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace α`: The topological space `t` has a countable, dense subset.
* `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s`: The set `s` is contained in the closure of a countable set.
* `FirstCountableTopology α`: A topology in which `𝓝 x` is countably generated for
every `x`.
* `SecondCountableTopology α`: A topology which has a topological basis which is
countable.
## Main results
* `TopologicalSpace.FirstCountableTopology.tendsto_subseq`: In a first-countable space,
cluster points are limits of subsequences.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.isOpen_iUnion_countable`: In a second-countable space,
the union of arbitrarily-many open sets is equal to a sub-union of only countably many of these
sets.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.countable_cover_nhds`: Consider `f : α → Set α` with the
property that `f x ∈ 𝓝 x` for all `x`. Then there is some countable set `s` whose image covers
the space.
## Implementation Notes
For our applications we are interested that there exists a countable basis, but we do not need the
concrete basis itself. This allows us to declare these type classes as `Prop` to use them as mixins.
## TODO
More fine grained instances for `FirstCountableTopology`,
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`, and more.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology
noncomputable section
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
/-- A topological basis is one that satisfies the necessary conditions so that
it suffices to take unions of the basis sets to get a topology (without taking
finite intersections as well). -/
structure IsTopologicalBasis (s : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
/-- For every point `x`, the set of `t ∈ s` such that `x ∈ t` is directed downwards. -/
exists_subset_inter : ∀ t₁ ∈ s, ∀ t₂ ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃ ∈ s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂
/-- The sets from `s` cover the whole space. -/
sUnion_eq : ⋃₀ s = univ
/-- The topology is generated by sets from `s`. -/
eq_generateFrom : t = generateFrom s
/-- If a family of sets `s` generates the topology, then intersections of finite
subcollections of `s` form a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : t = generateFrom s) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun f => ⋂₀ f) '' { f : Set (Set α) | f.Finite ∧ f ⊆ s }) := by
subst t; letI := generateFrom s
refine ⟨?_, ?_, le_antisymm (le_generateFrom ?_) <| generateFrom_anti fun t ht => ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b⟩, rfl⟩ x h
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b⟩, sInter_union t₁ t₂⟩, h, Subset.rfl⟩
· rw [sUnion_image, iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff]
exact fun x => ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩, sInter_empty.substr <| mem_univ x⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb⟩, rfl⟩
exact hft.isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ GenerateOpen.basic _ <| htb hs
· rw [← sInter_singleton t]
exact ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩, rfl⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom s)
(hsi : FiniteInter s) : IsTopologicalBasis s := by
convert isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis hsg
refine le_antisymm (fun t ht ↦ ⟨{t}, by simpa using ht⟩) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g, ⟨hg, hgs⟩, rfl⟩
lift g to Finset (Set α) using hg
exact hsi.finiteInter_mem g hgs
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_inter {r : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom r)
(hsi : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ r → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ r → s ∩ t ∈ r) : IsTopologicalBasis (insert univ r) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter (by simpa using hsg) (FiniteInter.mk₂ hsi)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_hasBasis_nhds {s : Set (Set α)}
(h_nhds : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t ↦ t ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t) id) : IsTopologicalBasis s where
exists_subset_inter t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx := by
simpa only [and_assoc, (h_nhds x).mem_iff]
using (inter_mem ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₁, hx.1⟩) ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₂, hx.2⟩))
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x ↦ (h_nhds x).ex_mem
eq_generateFrom := ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
simpa only [nhds_generateFrom, and_comm] using (h_nhds x).eq_biInf
/-- If a family of open sets `s` is such that every open neighbourhood contains some
member of `s`, then `s` is a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds {s : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, IsOpen u)
(h_nhds : ∀ (a : α) (u : Set α), a ∈ u → IsOpen u → ∃ v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
IsTopologicalBasis s :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds <| fun a ↦
(nhds_basis_opens a).to_hasBasis' (by simpa [and_assoc] using h_nhds a)
fun _ ⟨hts, hat⟩ ↦ (h_open _ hts).mem_nhds hat
/-- A set `s` is in the neighbourhood of `a` iff there is some basis set `t`, which
contains `a` and is itself contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom, nhds_generateFrom, biInf_sets_eq]
· simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
· rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩
exact ⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_left),
le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_right)⟩
· rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by simp [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, hb.mem_nhds_iff]
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_isOpen_of_subset {s s' : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s', IsOpen u)
(hs : IsTopologicalBasis s) (hss' : s ⊆ s') : IsTopologicalBasis s' :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds h_open fun a _ ha u_open ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := hs.isOpen_iff.mp u_open a ha; ⟨t, hss' hts, ht⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t : Set α => t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) fun t => t :=
⟨fun s => hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [and_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : IsOpen s := by
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom]
exact .basic s hs
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (insert ∅ s) :=
h.of_isOpen_of_subset (by rintro _ (rfl | hu); exacts [isOpen_empty, h.isOpen hu])
(subset_insert ..)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (s \ {∅}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun _ hu ↦ h.isOpen hu.1) fun a _ ha hu ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := h.isOpen_iff.mp hu a ha
⟨t, ⟨hts, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' ht.1 <| not_mem_empty _⟩, ht⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) (ha : a ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
(hb.isOpen hs).mem_nhds ha
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b)
{a : α} {u : Set α} (au : a ∈ u) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 <| IsOpen.mem_nhds ou au
/-- Any open set is the union of the basis sets contained in it. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : u = ⋃₀ { s ∈ B | s ⊆ u } :=
ext fun _a =>
⟨fun ha =>
let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou
⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_b, ⟨_, bu⟩, ab⟩ => bu ab⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }, fun _ h => h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} : IsOpen u ↔ ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨hB.open_eq_sUnion, fun ⟨_S, hSB, hu⟩ => hu.symm ▸ isOpen_sUnion fun _s hs => hB.isOpen (hSB hs)⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → Set α), (u = ⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥({ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }), (↑), by
rw [← sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou, fun s => And.left s.2⟩
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.subset_of_forall_subset {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t) : s ⊆ t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs]; simpa [sUnion_subset_iff]
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.eq_of_forall_subset_iff {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s ↔ U ⊆ t) : s = t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ht]
exact congr_arg _ (Set.ext fun U ↦ and_congr_right <| h _)
/-- A point `a` is in the closure of `s` iff all basis sets containing `a` intersect `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α}
{a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_hasBasis).trans <| by simp only [and_imp]
/-- A set is dense iff it has non-trivial intersection with all basis sets. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, Set.Nonempty o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp only [Dense, hb.mem_closure_iff]
exact ⟨fun h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩ => h a o hb ha, fun h a o hb ha => h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set α)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun H o ho => H _ (hB.isOpen ho), fun hf o ho => ?_⟩
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' ho, sUnion_eq_iUnion, image_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun s => hf s s.2.1
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset {B : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} (hu : u.Nonempty) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ B, Set.Nonempty v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hu
let ⟨v, vB, xv, vu⟩ := hb.exists_subset_of_mem_open hx ou
⟨v, vB, ⟨x, xv⟩, vu⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_opens : IsTopologicalBasis { U : Set α | IsOpen U } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by tauto) (by tauto)
protected lemma IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {T : Set (Set β)}
(hf : IsInducing f) (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) : IsTopologicalBasis ((preimage f) '' T) :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ by
convert (hf.basis_nhds (h.nhds_hasBasis (a := f a))).to_image_id with s
aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsTopologicalBasis.inducing := IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.induced {α} [s : TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{T : Set (Set β)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f s) ((preimage f) '' T) :=
h.isInducing (t := induced f s) (.induced f)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {B₁ B₂ : Set (Set β)}
(h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁) B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₂) B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁ ⊓ t₂) (image2 (· ∩ ·) B₁ B₂) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds (t := ?_) fun a ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_inf (t₁ := t₁)]
convert ((h₁.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₁)).inf (h₂.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₂))).to_image_id
aesop
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf_induced {γ} [s : TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) (f₁ : γ → α)
(f₂ : γ → β) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f₁ t ⊓ induced f₂ s) (image2 (f₁ ⁻¹' · ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' ·) B₁ B₂) := by
simpa only [image2_image_left, image2_image_right] using (h₁.induced f₁).inf (h₂.induced f₂)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.prod {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) B₁ B₂) :=
h₁.inf_induced h₂ Prod.fst Prod.snd
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → Set α} (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
(Uc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) {b : ∀ i, Set (Set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (b i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' b i) := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun u hu => ?_) ?_
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩
exact (Uo i).isOpenMap_subtype_val _ ((hb i).isOpen sb)
· intro a u ha uo
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open ha (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_val) with
⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩
exact ⟨(↑) '' v, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{B : Set (Set β)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [hB.eq_generateFrom, continuous_generateFrom_iff]
@[simp] lemma isTopologicalBasis_empty : IsTopologicalBasis (∅ : Set (Set α)) ↔ IsEmpty α where
mp h := by simpa using h.sUnion_eq.symm
mpr h := ⟨by simp, by simp [Set.univ_eq_empty_iff.2], Subsingleton.elim ..⟩
variable (α)
/-- A separable space is one with a countable dense subset, available through
`TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense`. If `α` is also known to be nonempty, then
`TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` provides a sequence `ℕ → α` with dense range, see
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` is a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter (e.g., an `EMetricSpace`), then
this condition is equivalent to `SecondCountableTopology α`. In this case the
latter should be used as a typeclass argument in theorems because Lean can automatically deduce
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace` from `SecondCountableTopology` but it can't
deduce `SecondCountableTopology` from `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`.
Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: the previous paragraph describes the state of the art in Lean 3.
We can have instance cycles in Lean 4 but we might want to
postpone adding them till after the port. -/
@[mk_iff] class SeparableSpace : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable dense set. -/
exists_countable_dense : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s
theorem exists_countable_dense [SeparableSpace α] : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
SeparableSpace.exists_countable_dense
/-- A nonempty separable space admits a sequence with dense range. Instead of running `cases` on the
conclusion of this lemma, you might want to use `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` and
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
theorem exists_dense_seq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, DenseRange u := by
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range.mp hs
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩
/-- A dense sequence in a non-empty separable topological space.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
def denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ℕ → α :=
Classical.choose (exists_dense_seq α)
/-- The sequence `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq α` has dense range. -/
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : DenseRange (denseSeq α) :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
variable {α}
instance (priority := 100) Countable.to_separableSpace [Countable α] : SeparableSpace α where
exists_countable_dense := ⟨Set.univ, Set.countable_univ, dense_univ⟩
/-- If `f` has a dense range and its domain is countable, then its codomain is a separable space.
See also `DenseRange.separableSpace`. -/
theorem SeparableSpace.of_denseRange {ι : Sort _} [Countable ι] (u : ι → α) (hu : DenseRange u) :
SeparableSpace α :=
⟨⟨range u, countable_range u, hu⟩⟩
alias _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace' := SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
/-- If `α` is a separable space and `f : α → β` is a continuous map with dense range, then `β` is
a separable space as well. E.g., the completion of a separable uniform space is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (h : DenseRange f) (h' : Continuous f) : SeparableSpace β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
⟨⟨f '' s, Countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
theorem _root_.Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : IsQuotientMap f) : SeparableSpace β :=
hf.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace hf.continuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias _root_.QuotientMap.separableSpace := Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace
/-- The product of two separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] [SeparableSpace β] : SeparableSpace (α × β) := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩
rcases exists_countable_dense β with ⟨t, htc, htd⟩
exact ⟨⟨s ×ˢ t, hsc.prod htc, hsd.prod htd⟩⟩
/-- The product of a countable family of separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SeparableSpace (X i)]
[Countable ι] : SeparableSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
choose t htc htd using (exists_countable_dense <| X ·)
haveI := fun i ↦ (htc i).to_subtype
nontriviality ∀ i, X i; inhabit ∀ i, X i
classical
set f : (Σ I : Finset ι, ∀ i : I, t i) → ∀ i, X i := fun ⟨I, g⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then g ⟨i, hi⟩ else (default : ∀ i, X i) i
refine ⟨⟨range f, countable_range f, dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 hU g hg with ⟨I, u, huo, huU⟩
have : ∀ i : I, ∃ y ∈ t i, y ∈ u i := fun i ↦
(htd i).exists_mem_open (huo i i.2).1 ⟨_, (huo i i.2).2⟩
choose y hyt hyu using this
lift y to ∀ i : I, t i using hyt
refine ⟨f ⟨I, y⟩, huU fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_, mem_range_self (f := f) ⟨I, y⟩⟩
simp only [f, dif_pos hi]
exact hyu ⟨i, _⟩
instance [SeparableSpace α] {r : α → α → Prop} : SeparableSpace (Quot r) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
instance [SeparableSpace α] {s : Setoid α} : SeparableSpace (Quotient s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
/-- A topological space with discrete topology is separable iff it is countable. -/
theorem separableSpace_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology α] : SeparableSpace α ↔ Countable α := by
simp [separableSpace_iff, countable_univ_iff]
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Pairwise.countable_of_isOpen_disjoint [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty) : Countable ι := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨u, u_countable, u_dense⟩
choose f hfu hfs using fun i ↦ u_dense.exists_mem_open (ho i) (hne i)
have f_inj : Injective f := fun i j hij ↦
hd.eq <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨f i, hfs i, hij.symm ▸ hfs j⟩
have := u_countable.to_subtype
exact (f_inj.codRestrict hfu).countable
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s) (ho : ∀ i ∈ a, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i ∈ a, (s i).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.subtype _ _).countable_of_isOpen_disjoint (Subtype.forall.2 ho) (Subtype.forall.2 hne)
/-- In a separable space, a family of disjoint sets with nonempty interiors is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s)
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, (interior (s i)).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.mono fun _ => interior_subset).countable_of_isOpen (fun _ _ => isOpen_interior) ha
/-- A set `s` in a topological space is separable if it is contained in the closure of a countable
set `c`. Beware that this definition does not require that `c` is contained in `s` (to express the
latter, use `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace s` or
`TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (univ : Set s))`. In metric spaces, the two definitions are
| equivalent, see `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace`. -/
def IsSeparable (s : Set α) :=
∃ c : Set α, c.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure c
theorem IsSeparable.mono {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : u ⊆ s) : IsSeparable u := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hs⟩
exact ⟨c, c_count, hu.trans hs⟩
theorem IsSeparable.iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
| Mathlib/Topology/Bases.lean | 421 | 429 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.MonoOver
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
/-!
# Subobjects
We define `Subobject X` as the quotient (by isomorphisms) of
`MonoOver X := {f : Over X // Mono f.hom}`.
Here `MonoOver X` is a thin category (a pair of objects has at most one morphism between them),
so we can think of it as a preorder. However as it is not skeletal, it is not a partial order.
There is a coercion from `Subobject X` back to the ambient category `C`
(using choice to pick a representative), and for `P : Subobject X`,
`P.arrow : (P : C) ⟶ X` is the inclusion morphism.
We provide
* `def pullback [HasPullbacks C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X`
* `def map (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
* `def «exists_» [HasImages C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
and prove their basic properties and relationships.
These are all easy consequences of the earlier development
of the corresponding functors for `MonoOver`.
The subobjects of `X` form a preorder making them into a category. We have `X ≤ Y` if and only if
`X.arrow` factors through `Y.arrow`: see `ofLE`/`ofLEMk`/`ofMkLE`/`ofMkLEMk` and
`le_of_comm`. Similarly, to show that two subobjects are equal, we can supply an isomorphism between
the underlying objects that commutes with the arrows (`eq_of_comm`).
See also
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru` :
an API describing factorization of morphisms through subobjects.
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.lattice` :
the lattice structures on subobjects.
## Notes
This development originally appeared in Bhavik Mehta's "Topos theory for Lean" repository,
and was ported to mathlib by Kim Morrison.
### Implementation note
Currently we describe `pullback`, `map`, etc., as functors.
It may be better to just say that they are monotone functions,
and even avoid using categorical language entirely when describing `Subobject X`.
(It's worth keeping this in mind in future use; it should be a relatively easy change here
if it looks preferable.)
### Relation to pseudoelements
There is a separate development of pseudoelements in `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`,
as a quotient (but not by isomorphism) of `Over X`.
When a morphism `f` has an image, the image represents the same pseudoelement.
In a category with images `Pseudoelements X` could be constructed as a quotient of `MonoOver X`.
In fact, in an abelian category (I'm not sure in what generality beyond that),
`Pseudoelements X` agrees with `Subobject X`, but we haven't developed this in mathlib yet.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-!
We now construct the subobject lattice for `X : C`,
as the quotient by isomorphisms of `MonoOver X`.
Since `MonoOver X` is a thin category, we use `ThinSkeleton` to take the quotient.
Essentially all the structure defined above on `MonoOver X` descends to `Subobject X`,
with morphisms becoming inequalities, and isomorphisms becoming equations.
-/
/-- The category of subobjects of `X : C`, defined as isomorphism classes of monomorphisms into `X`.
-/
def Subobject (X : C) :=
ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X)
instance (X : C) : PartialOrder (Subobject X) :=
inferInstanceAs <| PartialOrder (ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X))
namespace Subobject
-- Porting note: made it a def rather than an abbreviation
-- because Lean would make it too transparent
/-- Convenience constructor for a subobject. -/
def mk {X A : C} (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject X :=
(toThinSkeleton _).obj (MonoOver.mk' f)
section
attribute [local ext] CategoryTheory.Comma
protected theorem ind {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], p (Subobject.mk f)) (P : Subobject X) : p P := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn'
intro a
exact h a.arrow
protected theorem ind₂ {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g],
p (Subobject.mk f) (Subobject.mk g))
(P Q : Subobject X) : p P Q := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn₂'
intro a b
exact h a.arrow b.arrow
end
/-- Declare a function on subobjects of `X` by specifying a function on monomorphisms with
codomain `X`. -/
protected def lift {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α)
(h :
∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A ≅ B),
i.hom ≫ g = f → F f = F g) :
Subobject X → α := fun P =>
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun m => F m.arrow) fun m n ⟨i⟩ =>
h m.arrow n.arrow ((MonoOver.forget X ⋙ Over.forget X).mapIso i) (Over.w i.hom)
@[simp]
protected theorem lift_mk {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α) {h A}
(f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject.lift F h (Subobject.mk f) = F f :=
rfl
/-- The category of subobjects is equivalent to the `MonoOver` category. It is more convenient to
use the former due to the partial order instance, but oftentimes it is easier to define structures
on the latter. -/
noncomputable def equivMonoOver (X : C) : Subobject X ≌ MonoOver X :=
ThinSkeleton.equivalence _
/-- Use choice to pick a representative `MonoOver X` for each `Subobject X`.
-/
noncomputable def representative {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ MonoOver X :=
(equivMonoOver X).functor
instance : (representative (X := X)).IsEquivalence :=
(equivMonoOver X).isEquivalence_functor
/-- Starting with `A : MonoOver X`, we can take its equivalence class in `Subobject X`
then pick an arbitrary representative using `representative.obj`.
This is isomorphic (in `MonoOver X`) to the original `A`.
-/
noncomputable def representativeIso {X : C} (A : MonoOver X) :
representative.obj ((toThinSkeleton _).obj A) ≅ A :=
(equivMonoOver X).counitIso.app A
/-- Use choice to pick a representative underlying object in `C` for any `Subobject X`.
Prefer to use the coercion `P : C` rather than explicitly writing `underlying.obj P`.
-/
noncomputable def underlying {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ C :=
representative ⋙ MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _
instance : CoeOut (Subobject X) C where coe Y := underlying.obj Y
-- Porting note: removed as it has become a syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem underlying_as_coe {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : underlying.obj P = P :=
-- rfl
/-- If we construct a `Subobject Y` from an explicit `f : X ⟶ Y` with `[Mono f]`,
then pick an arbitrary choice of underlying object `(Subobject.mk f : C)` back in `C`,
it is isomorphic (in `C`) to the original `X`.
-/
noncomputable def underlyingIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (Subobject.mk f : C) ≅ X :=
(MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _).mapIso (representativeIso (MonoOver.mk' f))
/-- The morphism in `C` from the arbitrarily chosen underlying object to the ambient object.
-/
noncomputable def arrow {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : (Y : C) ⟶ X :=
(representative.obj Y).obj.hom
instance arrow_mono {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : Mono Y.arrow :=
(representative.obj Y).property
@[simp]
theorem arrow_congr {A : C} (X Y : Subobject A) (h : X = Y) :
eqToHom (congr_arg (fun X : Subobject A => (X : C)) h) ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow := by
induction h
simp
@[simp]
theorem representative_coe (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y : C) = (Y : C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem representative_arrow (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y).arrow = Y.arrow :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlying_arrow {X : C} {Y Z : Subobject X} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
underlying.map f ≫ arrow Z = arrow Y :=
Over.w (representative.map f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_arrow {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ (Subobject.mk f).arrow = f :=
Over.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).hom ≫ f = (mk f).arrow :=
(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).1 (underlyingIso_arrow f).symm
/-- Two morphisms into a subobject are equal exactly if
the morphisms into the ambient object are equal -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comp_arrow_eq {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f g : X ⟶ P}
(h : f ≫ P.arrow = g ≫ P.arrow) : f = g :=
(cancel_mono P.arrow).mp h
theorem mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂] (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
(w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) : mk f₁ ≤ mk f₂ :=
⟨MonoOver.homMk _ w⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_arrow (P : Subobject X) : mk P.arrow = P :=
Quotient.inductionOn' P fun Q => by
obtain ⟨e⟩ := @Quotient.mk_out' _ (isIsomorphicSetoid _) Q
exact Quotient.sound' ⟨MonoOver.isoMk (Iso.refl _) ≪≫ e⟩
theorem le_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C)) (w : f ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) :
X ≤ Y := by
convert mk_le_mk_of_comm _ w <;> simp
theorem le_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : (X : C) ⟶ A)
(w : g ≫ f = X.arrow) : X ≤ mk f :=
le_of_comm (g ≫ (underlyingIso f).inv) <| by simp [w]
theorem mk_le_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : A ⟶ (X : C))
(w : g ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f ≤ X :=
le_of_comm ((underlyingIso f).hom ≫ g) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem eq_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C))
(w : f.hom ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) : X = Y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_comm f.hom w) <| le_of_comm f.inv <| f.inv_comp_eq.2 w.symm
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem eq_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : (X : C) ≅ A)
(w : i.hom ≫ f = X.arrow) : X = mk f :=
eq_of_comm (i.trans (underlyingIso f).symm) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : A ≅ (X : C))
(w : i.hom ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f = X :=
Eq.symm <| eq_mk_of_comm _ i.symm <| by rw [Iso.symm_hom, Iso.inv_comp_eq, w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A₁ ≅ A₂)
(w : i.hom ≫ g = f) : mk f = mk g :=
eq_mk_of_comm _ ((underlyingIso f).trans i) <| by simp [w]
lemma mk_surjective {X : C} (S : Subobject X) :
∃ (A : C) (i : A ⟶ X) (_ : Mono i), S = Subobject.mk i :=
⟨_, S.arrow, inferInstance, by simp⟩
-- We make `X` and `Y` explicit arguments here so that when `ofLE` appears in goal statements
-- it is possible to see its source and target
-- (`h` will just display as `_`, because it is in `Prop`).
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofLE {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C) :=
underlying.map <| h.hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_arrow {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (h : X ≤ Y) : ofLE X Y h ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow :=
underlying_arrow _
instance {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : Mono (ofLE X Y h) := by
fconstructor
intro Z f g w
replace w := w =≫ Y.arrow
ext
simpa using w
theorem ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂]
(g : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) :
ofLE _ _ (mk_le_mk_of_comm g w) = (underlyingIso _).hom ≫ g ≫ (underlyingIso _).inv := by
ext
simp [w]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofLEMk {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) : (X : C) ⟶ A :=
ofLE X (mk f) h ≫ (underlyingIso f).hom
instance {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
Mono (ofLEMk X f h) := by
dsimp only [ofLEMk]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofLEMk_comp {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
ofLEMk X f h ≫ f = X.arrow := by simp [ofLEMk]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofMkLE {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) : A ⟶ (X : C) :=
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ ofLE (mk f) X h
instance {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) :
Mono (ofMkLE f X h) := by
dsimp only [ofMkLE]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofMkLE_arrow {B A : C} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] {X : Subobject B} (h : mk f ≤ X) :
ofMkLE f X h ≫ X.arrow = f := by simp [ofMkLE]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofMkLEMk {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
A₁ ⟶ A₂ :=
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ ofLE (mk f) (mk g) h ≫ (underlyingIso g).hom
instance {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
Mono (ofMkLEMk f g h) := by
dsimp only [ofMkLEMk]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofMkLEMk_comp {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f : A₁ ⟶ B} {g : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
ofMkLEMk f g h ≫ g = f := by simp [ofMkLEMk]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLE {B : C} (X Y Z : Subobject B) (h₁ : X ≤ Y) (h₂ : Y ≤ Z) :
ofLE X Y h₁ ≫ ofLE Y Z h₂ = ofLE X Z (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp underlying]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLEMk {B A : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h₁ : X ≤ Y)
(h₂ : Y ≤ mk f) : ofLE X Y h₁ ≫ ofLEMk Y f h₂ = ofLEMk X f (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc underlying]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLEMk_comp_ofMkLE {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (Y : Subobject B)
(h₁ : X ≤ mk f) (h₂ : mk f ≤ Y) : ofLEMk X f h₁ ≫ ofMkLE f Y h₂ = ofLE X Y (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp underlying, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
| congr 1
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Basic.lean | 364 | 365 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Monad
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Charpoly.ToMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Univ
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials of linear families of endomorphisms
The coefficients of the characteristic polynomials of a linear family of endomorphisms
are homogeneous polynomials in the parameters.
This result is used in Lie theory
to establish the existence of regular elements and Cartan subalgebras,
and ultimately a well-defined notion of rank for Lie algebras.
In this file we prove this result about characteristic polynomials.
Let `L` and `M` be modules over a nontrivial commutative ring `R`,
and let `φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M` be a linear map.
Let `b` be a basis of `L`, indexed by `ι`.
Then we define a multivariate polynomial with variables indexed by `ι`
that evaluates on elements `x` of `L` to the characteristic polynomial of `φ x`.
## Main declarations
* `Matrix.toMvPolynomial M i`: the family of multivariate polynomials that evaluates on `c : n → R`
to the dot product of the `i`-th row of `M` with `c`.
`Matrix.toMvPolynomial M i` is the sum of the monomials `C (M i j) * X j`.
* `LinearMap.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ f`: a version of `Matrix.toMvPolynomial` for linear maps `f`
with respect to bases `b₁` and `b₂` of the domain and codomain.
* `LinearMap.polyCharpoly`: the multivariate polynomial that evaluates on elements `x` of `L`
to the characteristic polynomial of `φ x`.
* `LinearMap.polyCharpoly_map_eq_charpoly`: the evaluation of `polyCharpoly` on elements `x` of `L`
is the characteristic polynomial of `φ x`.
* `LinearMap.polyCharpoly_coeff_isHomogeneous`: the coefficients of `polyCharpoly`
are homogeneous polynomials in the parameters.
* `LinearMap.nilRank`: the smallest index at which `polyCharpoly` has a non-zero coefficient,
which is independent of the choice of basis for `L`.
* `LinearMap.IsNilRegular`: an element `x` of `L` is *nil-regular* with respect to `φ`
if the `n`-th coefficient of the characteristic polynomial of `φ x` is non-zero,
where `n` denotes the nil-rank of `φ`.
## Implementation details
We show that `LinearMap.polyCharpoly` does not depend on the choice of basis of the target module.
This is done via `LinearMap.polyCharpoly_eq_polyCharpolyAux`
and `LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux_basisIndep`.
The latter is proven by considering
the base change of the `R`-linear map `φ : L →ₗ[R] End R M`
to the multivariate polynomial ring `MvPolynomial ι R`,
and showing that `polyCharpolyAux φ` is equal to the characteristic polynomial of this base change.
The proof concludes because characteristic polynomials are independent of the chosen basis.
## References
* [barnes1967]: "On Cartan subalgebras of Lie algebras" by D.W. Barnes.
-/
open scoped Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {m n o R S : Type*}
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype o] [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
open MvPolynomial
/-- Let `M` be an `(m × n)`-matrix over `R`.
Then `Matrix.toMvPolynomial M` is the family (indexed by `i : m`)
of multivariate polynomials in `n` variables over `R` that evaluates on `c : n → R`
to the dot product of the `i`-th row of `M` with `c`:
`Matrix.toMvPolynomial M i` is the sum of the monomials `C (M i j) * X j`. -/
noncomputable
def toMvPolynomial (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) : MvPolynomial n R :=
∑ j, monomial (.single j 1) (M i j)
lemma toMvPolynomial_eval_eq_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) (c : n → R) :
eval c (M.toMvPolynomial i) = (M *ᵥ c) i := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, map_sum, eval_monomial, pow_zero, Finsupp.prod_single_index, pow_one,
mulVec, dotProduct]
lemma toMvPolynomial_map (f : R →+* S) (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) :
(M.map f).toMvPolynomial i = MvPolynomial.map f (M.toMvPolynomial i) := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, map_apply, map_sum, map_monomial]
lemma toMvPolynomial_isHomogeneous (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) :
(M.toMvPolynomial i).IsHomogeneous 1 := by
apply MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.sum
rintro j -
apply MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_monomial _ _
simp [Finsupp.degree, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ one_ne_zero, Finset.sum_singleton,
Finsupp.single_eq_same]
lemma toMvPolynomial_totalDegree_le (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) :
(M.toMvPolynomial i).totalDegree ≤ 1 := by
apply (toMvPolynomial_isHomogeneous _ _).totalDegree_le
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_constantCoeff (M : Matrix m n R) (i : m) :
constantCoeff (M.toMvPolynomial i) = 0 := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, ← C_mul_X_eq_monomial, map_sum, map_mul, constantCoeff_X,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_zero : (0 : Matrix m n R).toMvPolynomial = 0 := by
ext; simp only [toMvPolynomial, zero_apply, map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_one [DecidableEq n] : (1 : Matrix n n R).toMvPolynomial = X := by
ext i : 1
rw [toMvPolynomial, Finset.sum_eq_single i]
· simp only [one_apply_eq, ← C_mul_X_eq_monomial, C_1, one_mul]
· rintro j - hj
simp only [one_apply_ne hj.symm, map_zero]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
lemma toMvPolynomial_add (M N : Matrix m n R) :
(M + N).toMvPolynomial = M.toMvPolynomial + N.toMvPolynomial := by
ext i : 1
simp only [toMvPolynomial, add_apply, map_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, Pi.add_apply]
lemma toMvPolynomial_mul (M : Matrix m n R) (N : Matrix n o R) (i : m) :
(M * N).toMvPolynomial i = bind₁ N.toMvPolynomial (M.toMvPolynomial i) := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, mul_apply, map_sum, Finset.sum_comm (γ := o), bind₁, aeval,
AlgHom.coe_mk, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_monomial, algebraMap_apply, Algebra.id.map_eq_id,
RingHom.id_apply, C_apply, pow_zero, Finsupp.prod_single_index, pow_one, Finset.mul_sum,
monomial_mul, zero_add]
end Matrix
namespace LinearMap
open MvPolynomial
section
variable {R M₁ M₂ ι₁ ι₂ : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable [Fintype ι₁] [Finite ι₂]
variable [DecidableEq ι₁]
variable (b₁ : Basis ι₁ R M₁) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ R M₂)
/-- Let `f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` be an `R`-linear map
between modules `M₁` and `M₂` with bases `b₁` and `b₂` respectively.
Then `LinearMap.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ f` is the family of multivariate polynomials over `R`
that evaluates on an element `x` of `M₁` (represented on the basis `b₁`)
to the element `f x` of `M₂` (represented on the basis `b₂`). -/
noncomputable
def toMvPolynomial (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) :
MvPolynomial ι₁ R :=
(toMatrix b₁ b₂ f).toMvPolynomial i
lemma toMvPolynomial_eval_eq_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) (c : ι₁ →₀ R) :
eval c (f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ i) = b₂.repr (f (b₁.repr.symm c)) i := by
rw [toMvPolynomial, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_eval_eq_apply,
← LinearMap.toMatrix_mulVec_repr b₁ b₂, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
open Algebra.TensorProduct in
lemma toMvPolynomial_baseChange (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
(f.baseChange A).toMvPolynomial (basis A b₁) (basis A b₂) i =
MvPolynomial.map (algebraMap R A) (f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ i) := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, toMatrix_baseChange, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_map]
lemma toMvPolynomial_isHomogeneous (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) :
(f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ i).IsHomogeneous 1 :=
Matrix.toMvPolynomial_isHomogeneous _ _
lemma toMvPolynomial_totalDegree_le (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) :
(f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ i).totalDegree ≤ 1 :=
Matrix.toMvPolynomial_totalDegree_le _ _
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_constantCoeff (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₂) :
constantCoeff (f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ i) = 0 :=
Matrix.toMvPolynomial_constantCoeff _ _
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_zero : (0 : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂).toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ = 0 := by
unfold toMvPolynomial; simp only [map_zero, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_zero]
@[simp]
lemma toMvPolynomial_id : (id : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁).toMvPolynomial b₁ b₁ = X := by
unfold toMvPolynomial; simp only [toMatrix_id, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_one]
lemma toMvPolynomial_add (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
(f + g).toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ = f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ + g.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂ := by
unfold toMvPolynomial; simp only [map_add, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_add]
end
variable {R M₁ M₂ M₃ ι₁ ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
variable [Fintype ι₁] [Fintype ι₂] [Finite ι₃]
variable [DecidableEq ι₁] [DecidableEq ι₂]
variable (b₁ : Basis ι₁ R M₁) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ R M₂) (b₃ : Basis ι₃ R M₃)
lemma toMvPolynomial_comp (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : ι₃) :
(g ∘ₗ f).toMvPolynomial b₁ b₃ i =
bind₁ (f.toMvPolynomial b₁ b₂) (g.toMvPolynomial b₂ b₃ i) := by
simp only [toMvPolynomial, toMatrix_comp b₁ b₂ b₃, Matrix.toMvPolynomial_mul]
rfl
end LinearMap
variable {R L M n ι ι' ιM : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup L] [Module R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M)
variable [Fintype ι] [Fintype ι'] [Fintype ιM] [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq ι']
namespace LinearMap
section aux
variable [DecidableEq ιM] (b : Basis ι R L) (bₘ : Basis ιM R M)
open Matrix
/-- (Implementation detail, see `LinearMap.polyCharpoly`.)
Let `L` and `M` be finite free modules over `R`,
and let `φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M` be a linear map.
Let `b` be a basis of `L` and `bₘ` a basis of `M`.
Then `LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ` is the polynomial that evaluates on elements `x` of `L`
to the characteristic polynomial of `φ x` acting on `M`.
This definition does not depend on the choice of `bₘ`
(see `LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux_basisIndep`). -/
noncomputable
def polyCharpolyAux : Polynomial (MvPolynomial ι R) :=
(charpoly.univ R ιM).map <| MvPolynomial.bind₁ (φ.toMvPolynomial b bₘ.end)
open Algebra.TensorProduct MvPolynomial in
lemma polyCharpolyAux_baseChange (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
polyCharpolyAux (tensorProduct _ _ _ _ ∘ₗ φ.baseChange A) (basis A b) (basis A bₘ) =
(polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).map (MvPolynomial.map (algebraMap R A)) := by
simp only [polyCharpolyAux]
rw [← charpoly.univ_map_map _ (algebraMap R A)]
simp only [Polynomial.map_map]
congr 1
apply ringHom_ext
· intro r
simp only [RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, map_C, bind₁_C_right]
· rintro ij
simp only [RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, map_X, bind₁_X_right]
classical
rw [toMvPolynomial_comp _ (basis A (Basis.end bₘ)), ← toMvPolynomial_baseChange]
suffices toMvPolynomial (M₂ := (Module.End A (TensorProduct R A M)))
(basis A bₘ.end) (basis A bₘ).end (tensorProduct R A M M) ij = X ij by
rw [this, bind₁_X_right]
simp only [toMvPolynomial, Matrix.toMvPolynomial]
suffices ∀ kl,
(toMatrix (basis A bₘ.end) (basis A bₘ).end) (tensorProduct R A M M) ij kl =
if kl = ij then 1 else 0 by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single ij]
· rw [this, if_pos rfl, X]
· rintro kl - H
rw [this, if_neg H, map_zero]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
intro kl
rw [toMatrix_apply, tensorProduct, TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply,
basis_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul, coe_restrictScalars]
dsimp only [coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, smul_apply, baseChangeHom_apply]
rw [one_smul, Basis.baseChange_end, Basis.repr_self_apply]
open LinearMap in
lemma polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_toMatrix_charpoly (x : L) :
(polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).map (MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x)) =
(toMatrix bₘ bₘ (φ x)).charpoly := by
rw [polyCharpolyAux, Polynomial.map_map, ← MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁,
MvPolynomial.comp_eval₂Hom, charpoly.univ_map_eval₂Hom]
congr
ext
rw [of_apply, Function.curry_apply, toMvPolynomial_eval_eq_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rfl
open LinearMap in
lemma polyCharpolyAux_eval_eq_toMatrix_charpoly_coeff (x : L) (i : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x) ((polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).coeff i) =
(toMatrix bₘ bₘ (φ x)).charpoly.coeff i := by
simp [← polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_toMatrix_charpoly φ b bₘ x]
@[simp]
lemma polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_charpoly [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R M]
(x : L) :
(polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).map (MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x)) = (φ x).charpoly := by
nontriviality R
rw [polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_toMatrix_charpoly, LinearMap.charpoly_toMatrix]
@[simp]
lemma polyCharpolyAux_coeff_eval [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R M] (x : L) (i : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x) ((polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).coeff i) = (φ x).charpoly.coeff i := by
nontriviality R
rw [← polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_charpoly φ b bₘ x, Polynomial.coeff_map]
lemma polyCharpolyAux_map_eval [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R M]
(x : ι → R) :
(polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).map (MvPolynomial.eval x) =
(φ (b.repr.symm (Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.symm x))).charpoly := by
simp only [← polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_charpoly φ b bₘ, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply,
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Finsupp.coe_mk]
open Algebra.TensorProduct TensorProduct in
lemma polyCharpolyAux_map_aeval
(A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] [Module.Finite A (A ⊗[R] M)] [Module.Free A (A ⊗[R] M)]
(x : ι → A) :
(polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ).map (MvPolynomial.aeval x).toRingHom =
LinearMap.charpoly ((tensorProduct R A M M).comp (baseChange A φ)
((basis A b).repr.symm (Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.symm x))) := by
rw [← polyCharpolyAux_map_eval (tensorProduct R A M M ∘ₗ baseChange A φ) _ (basis A bₘ),
polyCharpolyAux_baseChange, Polynomial.map_map]
congr
exact DFunLike.ext _ _ fun f ↦ (MvPolynomial.eval_map (algebraMap R A) x f).symm
open Algebra.TensorProduct MvPolynomial in
/-- `LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux` is independent of the choice of basis of the target module.
Proof strategy:
1. Rewrite `polyCharpolyAux` as the (honest, ordinary) characteristic polynomial
of the basechange of `φ` to the multivariate polynomial ring `MvPolynomial ι R`.
2. Use that the characteristic polynomial of a linear map is independent of the choice of basis.
This independence result is used transitively via
`LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux_map_aeval` and `LinearMap.polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_charpoly`. -/
lemma polyCharpolyAux_basisIndep {ιM' : Type*} [Fintype ιM'] [DecidableEq ιM']
(bₘ' : Basis ιM' R M) :
polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ = polyCharpolyAux φ b bₘ' := by
let f : Polynomial (MvPolynomial ι R) → Polynomial (MvPolynomial ι R) :=
Polynomial.map (MvPolynomial.aeval X).toRingHom
have hf : Function.Injective f := by
simp only [f, aeval_X_left, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.id_toRingHom, Polynomial.map_id]
exact Polynomial.map_injective (RingHom.id _) Function.injective_id
apply hf
let _h1 : Module.Finite (MvPolynomial ι R) (TensorProduct R (MvPolynomial ι R) M) :=
Module.Finite.of_basis (basis (MvPolynomial ι R) bₘ)
let _h2 : Module.Free (MvPolynomial ι R) (TensorProduct R (MvPolynomial ι R) M) :=
Module.Free.of_basis (basis (MvPolynomial ι R) bₘ)
simp only [f, polyCharpolyAux_map_aeval, polyCharpolyAux_map_aeval]
end aux
open Module Matrix
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] (b : Basis ι R L)
/-- Let `L` and `M` be finite free modules over `R`,
and let `φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M` be a linear family of endomorphisms.
Let `b` be a basis of `L` and `bₘ` a basis of `M`.
Then `LinearMap.polyCharpoly φ b` is the polynomial that evaluates on elements `x` of `L`
to the characteristic polynomial of `φ x` acting on `M`. -/
noncomputable
def polyCharpoly : Polynomial (MvPolynomial ι R) :=
φ.polyCharpolyAux b (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
lemma polyCharpoly_eq_of_basis [DecidableEq ιM] (bₘ : Basis ιM R M) :
polyCharpoly φ b =
(charpoly.univ R ιM).map (MvPolynomial.bind₁ (φ.toMvPolynomial b bₘ.end)) := by
rw [polyCharpoly, φ.polyCharpolyAux_basisIndep b (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M) bₘ,
polyCharpolyAux]
lemma polyCharpoly_monic : (polyCharpoly φ b).Monic :=
(charpoly.univ_monic R _).map _
lemma polyCharpoly_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : (polyCharpoly φ b) ≠ 0 :=
(polyCharpoly_monic _ _).ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma polyCharpoly_natDegree [Nontrivial R] :
(polyCharpoly φ b).natDegree = finrank R M := by
rw [polyCharpoly, polyCharpolyAux, (charpoly.univ_monic _ _).natDegree_map,
charpoly.univ_natDegree, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
lemma polyCharpoly_coeff_isHomogeneous (i j : ℕ) (hij : i + j = finrank R M) [Nontrivial R] :
((polyCharpoly φ b).coeff i).IsHomogeneous j := by
rw [finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex] at hij
rw [polyCharpoly, polyCharpolyAux, Polynomial.coeff_map, ← one_mul j]
apply (charpoly.univ_coeff_isHomogeneous _ _ _ _ hij).eval₂
· exact fun r ↦ MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C _ _
· exact LinearMap.toMvPolynomial_isHomogeneous _ _ _
open Algebra.TensorProduct MvPolynomial in
lemma polyCharpoly_baseChange (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
polyCharpoly (tensorProduct _ _ _ _ ∘ₗ φ.baseChange A) (basis A b) =
(polyCharpoly φ b).map (MvPolynomial.map (algebraMap R A)) := by
unfold polyCharpoly
rw [← φ.polyCharpolyAux_baseChange]
apply polyCharpolyAux_basisIndep
@[simp]
lemma polyCharpoly_map_eq_charpoly (x : L) :
(polyCharpoly φ b).map (MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x)) = (φ x).charpoly := by
rw [polyCharpoly, polyCharpolyAux_map_eq_charpoly]
@[simp]
lemma polyCharpoly_coeff_eval (x : L) (i : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.eval (b.repr x) ((polyCharpoly φ b).coeff i) = (φ x).charpoly.coeff i := by
rw [polyCharpoly, polyCharpolyAux_coeff_eval]
lemma polyCharpoly_coeff_eq_zero_of_basis (b : Basis ι R L) (b' : Basis ι' R L) (k : ℕ)
(H : (polyCharpoly φ b).coeff k = 0) :
(polyCharpoly φ b').coeff k = 0 := by
rw [polyCharpoly, polyCharpolyAux, Polynomial.coeff_map] at H ⊢
set B := (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M).end
set g := toMvPolynomial b' b LinearMap.id
apply_fun (MvPolynomial.bind₁ g) at H
have : toMvPolynomial b' B φ = fun i ↦ (MvPolynomial.bind₁ g) (toMvPolynomial b B φ i) :=
funext <| toMvPolynomial_comp b' b B φ LinearMap.id
rwa [map_zero, RingHom.coe_coe, MvPolynomial.bind₁_bind₁, ← this] at H
lemma polyCharpoly_coeff_eq_zero_iff_of_basis (b : Basis ι R L) (b' : Basis ι' R L) (k : ℕ) :
(polyCharpoly φ b).coeff k = 0 ↔ (polyCharpoly φ b').coeff k = 0 := by
constructor <;> apply polyCharpoly_coeff_eq_zero_of_basis
section aux
/-- (Implementation detail, see `LinearMap.nilRank`.)
Let `L` and `M` be finite free modules over `R`,
and let `φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M` be a linear family of endomorphisms.
Then `LinearMap.nilRankAux φ b` is the smallest index
at which `LinearMap.polyCharpoly φ b` has a non-zero coefficient.
This number does not depend on the choice of `b`, see `nilRankAux_basis_indep`. -/
noncomputable
def nilRankAux (φ : L →ₗ[R] Module.End R M) (b : Basis ι R L) : ℕ :=
(polyCharpoly φ b).natTrailingDegree
lemma polyCharpoly_coeff_nilRankAux_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] :
(polyCharpoly φ b).coeff (nilRankAux φ b) ≠ 0 := by
apply Polynomial.trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
apply polyCharpoly_ne_zero
lemma nilRankAux_le [Nontrivial R] (b : Basis ι R L) (b' : Basis ι' R L) :
nilRankAux φ b ≤ nilRankAux φ b' := by
apply Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
| rw [Ne, (polyCharpoly_coeff_eq_zero_iff_of_basis φ b b' _).not]
apply polyCharpoly_coeff_nilRankAux_ne_zero
lemma nilRankAux_basis_indep [Nontrivial R] (b : Basis ι R L) (b' : Basis ι' R L) :
nilRankAux φ b = (polyCharpoly φ b').natTrailingDegree := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LinearMap/Polynomial.lean | 444 | 448 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem limit.π_comp_eqToHom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
limit.π F j ≫ eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) = limit.π F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasLimitOfIso := hasLimit_of_iso
theorem hasLimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit F ↔ HasLimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α, fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α.symm⟩
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E) [h : HasLimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] :
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ H (limit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ limit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
H.map (limit.post F G) ≫ limit.post (F ⋙ G) H = limit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp, limit.post_π, limit.post_π]; rfl
end Post
theorem limit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasLimit F] [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
[h : HasLimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :-- G (limit F) ⟶ G (limit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ limit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (limit F) ⟶ limit F ⋙ G ⟶ limit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
G.map (limit.pre F E) ≫ limit.post (E ⋙ F) G = limit.post F G ≫ limit.pre (F ⋙ G) E := by
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.pre_π, assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.post_π]
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasLimitEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := Cone.whisker e.functor (limit.cone F)
isLimit := IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) e }
-- not entirely sure why this is needed
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a limit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a limit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasLimit F := by
haveI : HasLimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp e.symm
apply hasLimit_of_iso (e.invFunIdAssoc F)
-- `hasLimitCompEquivalence` and `hasLimitOfCompEquivalence`
-- are proved in `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits.lean`.
section LimFunctor
variable [HasLimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `limit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all limits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := limit F
map α := limMap α
map_id F := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp
map_comp α β := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp [assoc]
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem limMap_eq : limMap α = lim.map α := rfl
theorem limit.map_pre [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
| lim.map α ≫ limit.pre G E = limit.pre F E ≫ lim.map (whiskerLeft E α) := by
ext
simp
theorem limit.map_pre' [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
limit.pre F E₂ = limit.pre F E₁ ≫ lim.map (whiskerRight α F) := by
ext1; simp [← category.assoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 475 | 482 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,240 | 1,243 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (monomial 0) add fun n a _h =>
by rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; exact monomial _ _
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem support_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.erase n) = (support p).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [support, erase_def, Finsupp.support_erase]
theorem monomial_add_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : monomial n (coeff p n) + p.erase n = p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_erase, coeff]
exact Finsupp.single_add_erase _ _
theorem coeff_erase (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) :
(p.erase n).coeff i = if i = n then 0 else p.coeff i := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def, coeff]
exact ite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem erase_zero (n : ℕ) : (0 : R[X]).erase n = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_monomial {n : ℕ} {a : R} : erase n (monomial n a) = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.erase n) n = 0 := by simp [coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem erase_ne (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) (h : i ≠ n) : coeff (p.erase n) i = coeff p i := by
simp [coeff_erase, h]
section Update
/-- Replace the coefficient of a `p : R[X]` at a given degree `n : ℕ`
by a given value `a : R`. If `a = 0`, this is equal to `p.erase n`
If `p.natDegree < n` and `a ≠ 0`, this increases the degree to `n`. -/
def update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.ofFinsupp (p.toFinsupp.update n a)
theorem coeff_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(p.update n a).coeff = Function.update p.coeff n a := by
| ext
cases p
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 996 | 997 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-David Salchow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Bilinear
/-!
# Operator norm: Cartesian products
Interaction of operator norm with Cartesian products.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
open Set Real Metric ContinuousLinearMap
section SemiNormed
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
section FirstSecond
variable (𝕜 E F)
/-- The operator norm of the first projection `E × F → E` is at most 1. (It is 0 if `E` is zero, so
the inequality cannot be improved without further assumptions.) -/
lemma norm_fst_le : ‖fst 𝕜 E F‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one (fun ⟨e, f⟩ ↦ by simpa only [one_mul] using le_max_left ‖e‖ ‖f‖)
/-- The operator norm of the second projection `E × F → F` is at most 1. (It is 0 if `F` is zero, so
the inequality cannot be improved without further assumptions.) -/
lemma norm_snd_le : ‖snd 𝕜 E F‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one (fun ⟨e, f⟩ ↦ by simpa only [one_mul] using le_max_right ‖e‖ ‖f‖)
end FirstSecond
section OpNorm
@[simp]
theorem opNorm_prod (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (g : E →L[𝕜] G) : ‖f.prod g‖ = ‖(f, g)‖ :=
le_antisymm
(opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => by
simpa only [prod_apply, Prod.norm_def, max_mul_of_nonneg, norm_nonneg] using
max_le_max (le_opNorm f x) (le_opNorm g x)) <|
max_le
(opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x =>
(le_max_left _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_opNorm x))
(opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x =>
(le_max_right _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_opNorm x))
@[simp]
theorem opNNNorm_prod (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (g : E →L[𝕜] G) : ‖f.prod g‖₊ = ‖(f, g)‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| opNorm_prod f g
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.prod` as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`. -/
def prodₗᵢ (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [Module R F] [Module R G] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
[ContinuousConstSMul R G] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R G] :
(E →L[𝕜] F) × (E →L[𝕜] G) ≃ₗᵢ[R] E →L[𝕜] F × G :=
⟨prodₗ R, fun ⟨f, g⟩ => opNorm_prod f g⟩
end OpNorm
section Prod
variable (𝕜)
variable (M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄ : Type*)
[SeminormedAddCommGroup M₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 M₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup M₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜 M₂]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup M₃] [NormedSpace 𝕜 M₃]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup M₄] [NormedSpace 𝕜 M₄]
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.prodMap` as a continuous linear map. -/
def prodMapL : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) × (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄) →L[𝕜] M₁ × M₃ →L[𝕜] M₂ × M₄ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.copy
(have Φ₁ : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) →L[𝕜] M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂ × M₄ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 M₁ M₂ (M₂ × M₄) (ContinuousLinearMap.inl 𝕜 M₂ M₄)
have Φ₂ : (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄) →L[𝕜] M₃ →L[𝕜] M₂ × M₄ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 M₃ M₄ (M₂ × M₄) (ContinuousLinearMap.inr 𝕜 M₂ M₄)
have Φ₁' :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 (M₁ × M₃) M₁ (M₂ × M₄)).flip (ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 M₁ M₃)
have Φ₂' :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 (M₁ × M₃) M₃ (M₂ × M₄)).flip (ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 M₁ M₃)
have Ψ₁ : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) × (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄) →L[𝕜] M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄)
have Ψ₂ : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) × (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄) →L[𝕜] M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄)
Φ₁' ∘L Φ₁ ∘L Ψ₁ + Φ₂' ∘L Φ₂ ∘L Ψ₂)
(fun p : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) × (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄) => p.1.prodMap p.2) (by
apply funext
rintro ⟨φ, ψ⟩
refine ContinuousLinearMap.ext fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ => ?_
dsimp
simp)
variable {M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄}
@[simp]
theorem prodMapL_apply (p : (M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂) × (M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄)) :
ContinuousLinearMap.prodMapL 𝕜 M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄ p = p.1.prodMap p.2 :=
rfl
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem _root_.Continuous.prod_mapL {f : X → M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂} {g : X → M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun x => (f x).prodMap (g x) :=
(prodMapL 𝕜 M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄).continuous.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem _root_.Continuous.prod_map_equivL {f : X → M₁ ≃L[𝕜] M₂} {g : X → M₃ ≃L[𝕜] M₄}
(hf : Continuous fun x => (f x : M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂)) (hg : Continuous fun x => (g x : M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄)) :
Continuous fun x => ((f x).prod (g x) : M₁ × M₃ →L[𝕜] M₂ × M₄) :=
(prodMapL 𝕜 M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄).continuous.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.prod_mapL {f : X → M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂} {g : X → M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄} {s : Set X}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x).prodMap (g x)) s :=
((prodMapL 𝕜 M₁ M₂ M₃ M₄).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.prodMk hg) :)
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.prod_map_equivL {f : X → M₁ ≃L[𝕜] M₂} {g : X → M₃ ≃L[𝕜] M₄} {s : Set X}
(hf : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x : M₁ →L[𝕜] M₂)) s)
(hg : ContinuousOn (fun x => (g x : M₃ →L[𝕜] M₄)) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ((f x).prod (g x) : M₁ × M₃ →L[𝕜] M₂ × M₄)) s :=
hf.prod_mapL _ hg
end Prod
end ContinuousLinearMap
end SemiNormed
section Normed
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
section FirstSecond
variable (𝕜 E F)
/-- The operator norm of the first projection `E × F → E` is exactly 1 if `E` is nontrivial. -/
@[simp] lemma norm_fst [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [Nontrivial E] :
‖fst 𝕜 E F‖ = 1 := by
refine le_antisymm (norm_fst_le ..) ?_
let ⟨e, he⟩ := exists_ne (0 : E)
have : ‖e‖ ≤ _ * max ‖e‖ ‖(0 : F)‖ := (fst 𝕜 E F).le_opNorm (e, 0)
rw [norm_zero, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg e)] at this
rwa [← mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (norm_pos_iff.mpr he), one_mul]
/-- The operator norm of the second projection `E × F → F` is exactly 1 if `F` is nontrivial. -/
@[simp] lemma norm_snd [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
| [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [Nontrivial F] :
‖snd 𝕜 E F‖ = 1 := by
refine le_antisymm (norm_snd_le ..) ?_
let ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_ne (0 : F)
have : ‖f‖ ≤ _ * max ‖(0 : E)‖ ‖f‖ := (snd 𝕜 E F).le_opNorm (0, f)
rw [norm_zero, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg f)] at this
rwa [← mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (norm_pos_iff.mpr hf), one_mul]
end FirstSecond
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm/Prod.lean | 157 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joachim Breitner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
/-!
# Canonical homomorphism from a finite family of monoids
This file defines the construction of the canonical homomorphism from a family of monoids.
Given a family of morphisms `ϕ i : N i →* M` for each `i : ι` where elements in the
images of different morphisms commute, we obtain a canonical morphism
`MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod : (Π i, N i) →* M` that coincides with `ϕ`
## Main definitions
* `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod : (Π i, N i) →* M` is the main homomorphism
* `Subgroup.noncommPiCoprod : (Π i, H i) →* G` is the specialization to `H i : Subgroup G`
and the subgroup embedding.
## Main theorems
* `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod` coincides with `ϕ i` when restricted to `N i`
* `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod_mrange`: The range of `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod` is
`⨆ (i : ι), (ϕ i).mrange`
* `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod_range`: The range of `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod` is
`⨆ (i : ι), (ϕ i).range`
* `Subgroup.noncommPiCoprod_range`: The range of `Subgroup.noncommPiCoprod` is `⨆ (i : ι), H i`.
* `MonoidHom.injective_noncommPiCoprod_of_iSupIndep`: in the case of groups, `pi_hom.hom` is
injective if the `ϕ` are injective and the ranges of the `ϕ` are independent.
* `MonoidHom.independent_range_of_coprime_order`: If the `N i` have coprime orders, then the ranges
of the `ϕ` are independent.
* `Subgroup.independent_of_coprime_order`: If commuting normal subgroups `H i` have coprime orders,
they are independent.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
/-- `Finset.noncommProd` is “injective” in `f` if `f` maps into independent subgroups. This
generalizes (one direction of) `Subgroup.disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one`. -/
@[to_additive "`Finset.noncommSum` is “injective” in `f` if `f` maps into independent subgroups.
This generalizes (one direction of) `AddSubgroup.disjoint_iff_add_eq_zero`. "]
theorem eq_one_of_noncommProd_eq_one_of_iSupIndep {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → G) (comm)
(K : ι → Subgroup G) (hind : iSupIndep K) (hmem : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ K x)
(heq1 : s.noncommProd f comm = 1) : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
classical
revert heq1
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hnmem ih
· simp
· have hcomm := comm.mono (Finset.coe_subset.2 <| Finset.subset_insert _ _)
simp only [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hmem
have hmem_bsupr : s.noncommProd f hcomm ∈ ⨆ i ∈ (s : Set ι), K i := by
refine Subgroup.noncommProd_mem _ _ ?_
intro x hx
have : K x ≤ ⨆ i ∈ (s : Set ι), K i := le_iSup₂ (f := fun i _ => K i) x hx
exact this (hmem.2 x hx)
intro heq1
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hnmem] at heq1
have hnmem' : i ∉ (s : Set ι) := by simpa
obtain ⟨heq1i : f i = 1, heq1S : s.noncommProd f _ = 1⟩ :=
Subgroup.disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one.mp (hind.disjoint_biSup hnmem') hmem.1 hmem_bsupr heq1
intro i h
simp only [Finset.mem_insert] at h
rcases h with (rfl | h)
· exact heq1i
· refine ih hcomm hmem.2 heq1S _ h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias eq_one_of_noncommProd_eq_one_of_independent := eq_one_of_noncommProd_eq_one_of_iSupIndep
end Subgroup
section FamilyOfMonoids
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M]
-- We have a family of monoids
-- The fintype assumption is not always used, but declared here, to keep things in order
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {N : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (N i)]
-- And morphisms ϕ into G
variable (ϕ : ∀ i : ι, N i →* M)
-- We assume that the elements of different morphism commute
variable (hcomm : Pairwise fun i j => ∀ x y, Commute (ϕ i x) (ϕ j y))
namespace MonoidHom
/-- The canonical homomorphism from a family of monoids. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical homomorphism from a family of additive monoids. See also
`LinearMap.lsum` for a linear version without the commutativity assumption."]
def noncommPiCoprod : (∀ i : ι, N i) →* M where
toFun f := Finset.univ.noncommProd (fun i => ϕ i (f i)) fun _ _ _ _ h => hcomm h _ _
map_one' := by
apply (Finset.noncommProd_eq_pow_card _ _ _ _ _).trans (one_pow _)
simp
map_mul' f g := by
classical
convert @Finset.noncommProd_mul_distrib _ _ _ _ (fun i => ϕ i (f i)) (fun i => ϕ i (g i)) _ _ _
· exact map_mul _ _ _
· rintro i - j - h
exact hcomm h _ _
variable {hcomm}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (y : N i) :
noncommPiCoprod ϕ hcomm (Pi.mulSingle i y) = ϕ i y := by
change Finset.univ.noncommProd (fun j => ϕ j (Pi.mulSingle i y j)) (fun _ _ _ _ h => hcomm h _ _)
= ϕ i y
rw [← Finset.insert_erase (Finset.mem_univ i)]
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ (Finset.not_mem_erase i _)]
rw [Pi.mulSingle_eq_same]
rw [Finset.noncommProd_eq_pow_card]
· rw [one_pow]
exact mul_one _
· intro j hj
simp only [Finset.mem_erase] at hj
simp [hj]
/--
The universal property of `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod`
Given monoid morphisms `φᵢ : Nᵢ → M` whose images pairwise commute,
there exists a unique monoid morphism `φ : Πᵢ Nᵢ → M` that induces the `φᵢ`,
and it is given by `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod`. -/
@[to_additive "The universal property of `MonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod`
Given monoid morphisms `φᵢ : Nᵢ → M` whose images pairwise commute,
there exists a unique monoid morphism `φ : Πᵢ Nᵢ → M` that induces the `φᵢ`,
and it is given by `AddMonoidHom.noncommPiCoprod`."]
def noncommPiCoprodEquiv [DecidableEq ι] :
{ ϕ : ∀ i, N i →* M // Pairwise fun i j => ∀ x y, Commute (ϕ i x) (ϕ j y) } ≃
((∀ i, N i) →* M) where
toFun ϕ := noncommPiCoprod ϕ.1 ϕ.2
invFun f :=
⟨fun i => f.comp (MonoidHom.mulSingle N i), fun _ _ hij x y =>
Commute.map (Pi.mulSingle_commute hij x y) f⟩
left_inv ϕ := by
ext
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, mulSingle_apply, noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle]
right_inv f := pi_ext fun i x => by
simp only [noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, mulSingle_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommPiCoprod_mrange :
MonoidHom.mrange (noncommPiCoprod ϕ hcomm) = ⨆ i : ι, MonoidHom.mrange (ϕ i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
| apply le_antisymm
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine Submonoid.noncommProd_mem _ _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h => hcomm h _ _) (fun i _ => ?_)
apply Submonoid.mem_sSup_of_mem
· use i
simp
· refine iSup_le ?_
rintro i x ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Pi.mulSingle i y, noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle _ _ _⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma commute_noncommPiCoprod {m : M}
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/NoncommPiCoprod.lean | 159 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Brendan Murphy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Brendan Murphy
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Regular.IsSMulRegular
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nakayama
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.MaximalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Regular sequences and weakly regular sequences
The notion of a regular sequence is fundamental in commutative algebra.
Properties of regular sequences encode information about singularities of a
ring and regularity of a sequence can be tested homologically.
However the notion of a regular sequence is only really sensible for Noetherian local rings.
TODO: Koszul regular sequences, H_1-regular sequences, quasi-regular sequences, depth.
## Tags
module, regular element, regular sequence, commutative algebra
-/
universe u v
open scoped Pointwise
variable {R S M M₂ M₃ M₄ : Type*}
namespace Ideal
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
/-- The ideal generated by a list of elements. -/
abbrev ofList (rs : List R) := span { r | r ∈ rs }
@[simp] lemma ofList_nil : (ofList [] : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
have : { r | r ∈ [] } = ∅ := Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun _ => List.not_mem_nil)
Eq.trans (congrArg span this) span_empty
@[simp] lemma ofList_append (rs₁ rs₂ : List R) :
ofList (rs₁ ++ rs₂) = ofList rs₁ ⊔ ofList rs₂ :=
have : { r | r ∈ rs₁ ++ rs₂ } = _ := Set.ext (fun _ => List.mem_append)
Eq.trans (congrArg span this) (span_union _ _)
lemma ofList_singleton (r : R) : ofList [r] = span {r} :=
congrArg span (Set.ext fun _ => List.mem_singleton)
@[simp] lemma ofList_cons (r : R) (rs : List R) :
ofList (r::rs) = span {r} ⊔ ofList rs :=
Eq.trans (ofList_append [r] rs) (congrArg (· ⊔ _) (ofList_singleton r))
@[simp] lemma map_ofList (f : R →+* S) (rs : List R) :
map f (ofList rs) = ofList (rs.map f) :=
Eq.trans (map_span f { r | r ∈ rs }) <| congrArg span <|
Set.ext (fun _ => List.mem_map.symm)
lemma ofList_cons_smul {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (rs : List R) {M}
[AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (N : Submodule R M) :
ofList (r :: rs) • N = r • N ⊔ ofList rs • N := by
rw [ofList_cons, Submodule.sup_smul, Submodule.ideal_span_singleton_smul]
end Ideal
namespace Submodule
lemma smul_top_le_comap_smul_top [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂] (I : Ideal R)
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : I • ⊤ ≤ comap f (I • ⊤) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.mp <| le_of_eq_of_le (map_smul'' _ _ _) <|
smul_mono_right _ le_top
variable (M) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
[Module R M] [Module R M₂] (r : R) (rs : List R)
/-- The equivalence between M ⧸ (r₀, r₁, …, rₙ)M and (M ⧸ r₀M) ⧸ (r₁, …, rₙ) (M ⧸ r₀M). -/
def quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner :
(M ⧸ (Ideal.ofList (r :: rs) • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) ≃ₗ[R]
QuotSMulTop r M ⧸ (Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤ : Submodule R (QuotSMulTop r M)) :=
quotEquivOfEq _ _ (Ideal.ofList_cons_smul r rs ⊤) ≪≫ₗ
(quotientQuotientEquivQuotientSup (r • ⊤) (Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤)).symm ≪≫ₗ
quotEquivOfEq _ _ (by rw [map_smul'', map_top, range_mkQ])
/-- The equivalence between M ⧸ (r₀, r₁, …, rₙ)M and (M ⧸ (r₁, …, rₙ)) ⧸ r₀ (M ⧸ (r₁, …, rₙ)). -/
def quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopOuter :
(M ⧸ (Ideal.ofList (r :: rs) • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) ≃ₗ[R]
QuotSMulTop r (M ⧸ (Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) :=
quotEquivOfEq _ _ (Eq.trans (Ideal.ofList_cons_smul r rs ⊤) (sup_comm _ _)) ≪≫ₗ
(quotientQuotientEquivQuotientSup (Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤) (r • ⊤)).symm ≪≫ₗ
quotEquivOfEq _ _ (by rw [map_pointwise_smul, map_top, range_mkQ])
variable {M}
lemma quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner_naturality (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
(quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner M₂ r rs).toLinearMap ∘ₗ
mapQ _ _ _ (smul_top_le_comap_smul_top (Ideal.ofList (r :: rs)) f) =
mapQ _ _ _ (smul_top_le_comap_smul_top _ (QuotSMulTop.map r f)) ∘ₗ
(quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner M r rs).toLinearMap :=
quot_hom_ext _ _ _ fun _ => rfl
lemma top_eq_ofList_cons_smul_iff :
(⊤ : Submodule R M) = Ideal.ofList (r :: rs) • ⊤ ↔
(⊤ : Submodule R (QuotSMulTop r M)) = Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤ := by
conv => congr <;> rw [eq_comm, ← subsingleton_quotient_iff_eq_top]
exact (quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner M r rs).toEquiv.subsingleton_congr
end Submodule
namespace RingTheory.Sequence
open scoped TensorProduct List
open Function Submodule QuotSMulTop
variable (S M)
section Definitions
/-
In theory, regularity of `rs : List α` on `M` makes sense as soon as
`[Monoid α]`, `[AddCommGroup M]`, and `[DistribMulAction α M]`.
Instead of `Ideal.ofList (rs.take i) • (⊤ : Submodule R M)` we use
`⨆ (j : Fin i), rs[j] • (⊤ : AddSubgroup M)`.
However it's not clear that this is a useful generalization.
If we add the assumption `[SMulCommClass α α M]` this is essentially the same
as focusing on the commutative ring case, by passing to the monoid ring
`ℤ[abelianization of α]`.
-/
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
open Ideal
/-- A sequence `[r₁, …, rₙ]` is weakly regular on `M` iff `rᵢ` is regular on
`M⧸(r₁, …, rᵢ₋₁)M` for all `1 ≤ i ≤ n`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsWeaklyRegular (rs : List R) : Prop where
regular_mod_prev : ∀ i (h : i < rs.length),
IsSMulRegular (M ⧸ (ofList (rs.take i) • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) rs[i]
lemma isWeaklyRegular_iff_Fin (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M rs ↔ ∀ (i : Fin rs.length),
IsSMulRegular (M ⧸ (ofList (rs.take i) • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) rs[i] :=
Iff.trans (isWeaklyRegular_iff M rs) (Iff.symm Fin.forall_iff)
/-- A weakly regular sequence `rs` on `M` is regular if also `M/rsM ≠ 0`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsRegular (rs : List R) : Prop extends IsWeaklyRegular M rs where
top_ne_smul : (⊤ : Submodule R M) ≠ Ideal.ofList rs • ⊤
end Definitions
section Congr
variable {S M} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
[Module R M] [Module S M₂]
{σ : R →+* S} {σ' : S →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ]
open DistribMulAction AddSubgroup in
private lemma _root_.AddHom.map_smul_top_toAddSubgroup_of_surjective
{f : M →+ M₂} {as : List R} {bs : List S} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun r s => ∀ x, f (r • x) = s • f x) as bs) :
(Ideal.ofList as • ⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup.map f =
(Ideal.ofList bs • ⊤ : Submodule S M₂).toAddSubgroup := by
induction h with
| nil =>
convert AddSubgroup.map_bot f using 1 <;>
rw [Ideal.ofList_nil, bot_smul, bot_toAddSubgroup]
| @cons r s _ _ h _ ih =>
conv => congr <;> rw [Ideal.ofList_cons, sup_smul, sup_toAddSubgroup,
ideal_span_singleton_smul, pointwise_smul_toAddSubgroup,
top_toAddSubgroup, pointwise_smul_def]
apply DFunLike.ext (f.comp (toAddMonoidEnd R M r))
((toAddMonoidEnd S M₂ s).comp f) at h
rw [AddSubgroup.map_sup, ih, map_map, h, ← map_map,
map_top_of_surjective f hf]
lemma _root_.AddEquiv.isWeaklyRegular_congr {e : M ≃+ M₂} {as bs}
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun (r : R) (s : S) => ∀ x, e (r • x) = s • e x) as bs) :
IsWeaklyRegular M as ↔ IsWeaklyRegular M₂ bs := by
conv => congr <;> rw [isWeaklyRegular_iff_Fin]
let e' i : (M ⧸ (Ideal.ofList (as.take i) • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) ≃+
M₂ ⧸ (Ideal.ofList (bs.take i) • ⊤ : Submodule S M₂) :=
QuotientAddGroup.congr _ _ e <|
AddHom.map_smul_top_toAddSubgroup_of_surjective e.surjective <|
List.forall₂_take i h
refine (finCongr h.length_eq).forall_congr @fun _ => (e' _).isSMulRegular_congr ?_
exact (mkQ_surjective _).forall.mpr fun _ => congrArg (mkQ _) (h.get _ _ _)
lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isWeaklyRegular_congr' (e : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] M₂) (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M rs ↔ IsWeaklyRegular M₂ (rs.map σ) :=
e.toAddEquiv.isWeaklyRegular_congr <| List.forall₂_map_right_iff.mpr <|
List.forall₂_same.mpr fun r _ x => e.map_smul' r x
lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isWeaklyRegular_congr [Module R M₂] (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M rs ↔ IsWeaklyRegular M₂ rs :=
Iff.trans (e.isWeaklyRegular_congr' rs) <| iff_of_eq <| congrArg _ rs.map_id
lemma _root_.AddEquiv.isRegular_congr {e : M ≃+ M₂} {as bs}
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun (r : R) (s : S) => ∀ x, e (r • x) = s • e x) as bs) :
IsRegular M as ↔ IsRegular M₂ bs := by
conv => congr <;> rw [isRegular_iff, ne_eq, eq_comm,
← subsingleton_quotient_iff_eq_top]
let e' := QuotientAddGroup.congr _ _ e <|
AddHom.map_smul_top_toAddSubgroup_of_surjective e.surjective h
exact and_congr (e.isWeaklyRegular_congr h) e'.subsingleton_congr.not
lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isRegular_congr' (e : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] M₂) (rs : List R) :
IsRegular M rs ↔ IsRegular M₂ (rs.map σ) :=
e.toAddEquiv.isRegular_congr <| List.forall₂_map_right_iff.mpr <|
List.forall₂_same.mpr fun r _ x => e.map_smul' r x
lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isRegular_congr [Module R M₂] (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (rs : List R) :
IsRegular M rs ↔ IsRegular M₂ rs :=
Iff.trans (e.isRegular_congr' rs) <| iff_of_eq <| congrArg _ rs.map_id
end Congr
lemma isWeaklyRegular_map_algebraMap_iff [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M (rs.map (algebraMap R S)) ↔ IsWeaklyRegular M rs :=
(AddEquiv.refl M).isWeaklyRegular_congr <| List.forall₂_map_left_iff.mpr <|
List.forall₂_same.mpr fun r _ => algebraMap_smul S r
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃]
[AddCommGroup M₄] [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
@[simp]
lemma isWeaklyRegular_cons_iff (r : R) (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M (r :: rs) ↔
IsSMulRegular M r ∧ IsWeaklyRegular (QuotSMulTop r M) rs :=
have := Eq.trans (congrArg (· • ⊤) Ideal.ofList_nil) (bot_smul ⊤)
let e i := quotOfListConsSMulTopEquivQuotSMulTopInner M r (rs.take i)
Iff.trans (isWeaklyRegular_iff_Fin _ _) <| Iff.trans Fin.forall_iff_succ <|
and_congr ((quotEquivOfEqBot _ this).isSMulRegular_congr r) <|
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun i => (e i).isSMulRegular_congr (rs.get i))
(isWeaklyRegular_iff_Fin _ _).symm
lemma isWeaklyRegular_cons_iff' (r : R) (rs : List R) :
IsWeaklyRegular M (r :: rs) ↔
IsSMulRegular M r ∧
IsWeaklyRegular (QuotSMulTop r M)
(rs.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {r}))) :=
Iff.trans (isWeaklyRegular_cons_iff M r rs) <| and_congr_right' <|
| Iff.symm <| isWeaklyRegular_map_algebraMap_iff (R ⧸ Ideal.span {r}) _ rs
@[simp]
lemma isRegular_cons_iff (r : R) (rs : List R) :
IsRegular M (r :: rs) ↔
IsSMulRegular M r ∧ IsRegular (QuotSMulTop r M) rs := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Regular/RegularSequence.lean | 248 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.KummerPolynomial
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
/-!
# Perfect fields and rings
In this file we define perfect fields, together with a generalisation to (commutative) rings in
prime characteristic.
## Main definitions / statements:
* `PerfectRing`: a ring of characteristic `p` (prime) is said to be perfect in the sense of Serre,
if its absolute Frobenius map `x ↦ xᵖ` is bijective.
* `PerfectField`: a field `K` is said to be perfect if every irreducible polynomial over `K` is
separable.
* `PerfectRing.toPerfectField`: a field that is perfect in the sense of Serre is a perfect field.
* `PerfectField.toPerfectRing`: a perfect field of characteristic `p` (prime) is perfect in the
sense of Serre.
* `PerfectField.ofCharZero`: all fields of characteristic zero are perfect.
* `PerfectField.ofFinite`: all finite fields are perfect.
* `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree`: a polynomial over a perfect field is separable iff
it is square-free.
* `Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isSeparable_of_perfectField`, `Algebra.IsAlgebraic.perfectField`:
if `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then `L / K` is separable,
and `L` is also a perfect field.
-/
open Function Polynomial
/-- A perfect ring of characteristic `p` (prime) in the sense of Serre.
NB: This is not related to the concept with the same name introduced by Bass (related to projective
covers of modules). -/
class PerfectRing (R : Type*) (p : ℕ) [CommSemiring R] [ExpChar R p] : Prop where
/-- A ring is perfect if the Frobenius map is bijective. -/
bijective_frobenius : Bijective <| frobenius R p
section PerfectRing
variable (R : Type*) (p m n : ℕ) [CommSemiring R] [ExpChar R p]
/-- For a reduced ring, surjectivity of the Frobenius map is a sufficient condition for perfection.
-/
lemma PerfectRing.ofSurjective (R : Type*) (p : ℕ) [CommRing R] [ExpChar R p]
[IsReduced R] (h : Surjective <| frobenius R p) : PerfectRing R p :=
⟨frobenius_inj R p, h⟩
instance PerfectRing.ofFiniteOfIsReduced (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [ExpChar R p]
[Finite R] [IsReduced R] : PerfectRing R p :=
ofSurjective _ _ <| Finite.surjective_of_injective (frobenius_inj R p)
variable [PerfectRing R p]
@[simp]
theorem bijective_frobenius : Bijective (frobenius R p) := PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius
theorem bijective_iterateFrobenius : Bijective (iterateFrobenius R p n) :=
coe_iterateFrobenius R p n ▸ (bijective_frobenius R p).iterate n
@[simp]
theorem injective_frobenius : Injective (frobenius R p) := (bijective_frobenius R p).1
@[simp]
theorem surjective_frobenius : Surjective (frobenius R p) := (bijective_frobenius R p).2
/-- The Frobenius automorphism for a perfect ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def frobeniusEquiv : R ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective (frobenius R p) PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius
@[simp]
theorem coe_frobeniusEquiv : ⇑(frobeniusEquiv R p) = frobenius R p := rfl
theorem frobeniusEquiv_def (x : R) : frobeniusEquiv R p x = x ^ p := rfl
/-- The iterated Frobenius automorphism for a perfect ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def iterateFrobeniusEquiv : R ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective (iterateFrobenius R p n) (bijective_iterateFrobenius R p n)
@[simp]
theorem coe_iterateFrobeniusEquiv : ⇑(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n) = iterateFrobenius R p n := rfl
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n x = x ^ p ^ n := rfl
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n) x =
iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n x) :=
iterateFrobenius_add_apply R p m n x
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n) =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).trans (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m) :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply R p m n)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply (x : R) : (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).symm x =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m).symm ((iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm x) :=
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).injective <| by rw [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply, add_comm,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add : (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p (m + n)).symm =
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm.trans (iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p m).symm :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply R p m n)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 0 x = x := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, pow_zero, pow_one]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one_apply (x : R) : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 1 x = x ^ p := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 0 = RingEquiv.refl R :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero_apply R p)
@[simp]
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p 1 = frobeniusEquiv R p :=
RingEquiv.ext (iterateFrobeniusEquiv_one_apply R p)
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_eq_pow : iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n = frobeniusEquiv R p ^ n :=
DFunLike.ext' <| show _ = ⇑(RingAut.toPerm _ _) by
rw [map_pow, Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact (pow_iterate p n).symm
theorem iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm :
(iterateFrobeniusEquiv R p n).symm = (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm ^ n := by
rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_eq_pow]; exact (inv_pow _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_apply_frobenius (x : R) :
(frobeniusEquiv R p).symm (frobenius R p x) = x :=
leftInverse_surjInv PerfectRing.bijective_frobenius x
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm (x : R) :
frobenius R p ((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm x) = x :=
surjInv_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_comp_frobeniusEquiv_symm :
(frobenius R p).comp (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm = RingHom.id R := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_comp_frobenius :
((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm : R →+* R).comp (frobenius R p) = RingHom.id R := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem frobeniusEquiv_symm_pow_p (x : R) : ((frobeniusEquiv R p).symm x) ^ p = x :=
frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm R p x
theorem injective_pow_p {x y : R} (h : x ^ p = y ^ p) : x = y := (frobeniusEquiv R p).injective h
lemma polynomial_expand_eq (f : R[X]) :
expand R p f = (f.map (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm) ^ p := by
rw [← (f.map (S := R) (frobeniusEquiv R p).symm).expand_char p, map_expand, map_map,
frobenius_comp_frobeniusEquiv_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_expand (R p) [CommSemiring R] [Fact p.Prime] [CharP R p] [PerfectRing R p]
(f : R[X]) : ¬ Irreducible (expand R p f) := by
rw [polynomial_expand_eq]
exact not_irreducible_pow (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
instance instPerfectRingProd (S : Type*) [CommSemiring S] [ExpChar S p] [PerfectRing S p] :
PerfectRing (R × S) p where
bijective_frobenius := (bijective_frobenius R p).prodMap (bijective_frobenius S p)
end PerfectRing
/-- A perfect field.
See also `PerfectRing` for a generalisation in positive characteristic. -/
class PerfectField (K : Type*) [Field K] : Prop where
/-- A field is perfect if every irreducible polynomial is separable. -/
separable_of_irreducible : ∀ {f : K[X]}, Irreducible f → f.Separable
lemma PerfectRing.toPerfectField (K : Type*) (p : ℕ)
[Field K] [ExpChar K p] [PerfectRing K p] : PerfectField K := by
obtain hp | ⟨hp⟩ := ‹ExpChar K p›
· exact ⟨Irreducible.separable⟩
refine PerfectField.mk fun hf ↦ ?_
rcases separable_or p hf with h | ⟨-, g, -, rfl⟩
· assumption
· exfalso; revert hf; haveI := Fact.mk hp; simp
namespace PerfectField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
instance ofCharZero [CharZero K] : PerfectField K := ⟨Irreducible.separable⟩
instance ofFinite [Finite K] : PerfectField K := by
obtain ⟨p, _instP⟩ := CharP.exists K
have : Fact p.Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime K p⟩
exact PerfectRing.toPerfectField K p
variable [PerfectField K]
/-- A perfect field of characteristic `p` (prime) is a perfect ring. -/
instance toPerfectRing (p : ℕ) [hp : ExpChar K p] : PerfectRing K p := by
refine PerfectRing.ofSurjective _ _ fun y ↦ ?_
rcases hp with _ | hp
· simp [frobenius]
rw [← not_forall_not]
apply mt (X_pow_sub_C_irreducible_of_prime hp)
apply mt separable_of_irreducible
simp [separable_def, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero,
derivative_X_pow, degree_X_pow_sub_C hp.pos, hp.ne_zero]
theorem separable_iff_squarefree {g : K[X]} : g.Separable ↔ Squarefree g := by
refine ⟨Separable.squarefree, fun sqf ↦ isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (sqf.ne_zero ·.1) ?_⟩
rintro p (h : Irreducible p) ⟨q, rfl⟩ (dvd : p ∣ derivative (p * q))
replace dvd : p ∣ q := by
rw [derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right p _)] at dvd
exact (separable_of_irreducible h).dvd_of_dvd_mul_left dvd
exact (h.1 : ¬ IsUnit p) (sqf _ <| mul_dvd_mul_left _ dvd)
end PerfectField
/-- If `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then `L / K` is separable. -/
instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isSeparable_of_perfectField {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L]
[Algebra K L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [PerfectField K] : Algebra.IsSeparable K L :=
⟨fun x ↦ PerfectField.separable_of_irreducible <|
minpoly.irreducible (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral x)⟩
/-- If `L / K` is an algebraic extension, `K` is a perfect field, then so is `L`. -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.perfectField {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [PerfectField K] : PerfectField L := ⟨fun {f} hf ↦ by
obtain ⟨_, _, hi, h⟩ := hf.exists_dvd_monic_irreducible_of_isIntegral (K := K)
exact (PerfectField.separable_of_irreducible hi).map |>.of_dvd h⟩
namespace Polynomial
|
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p n : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] (f : R[X])
open Multiset
theorem roots_expand_pow_map_iterateFrobenius_le :
(expand R (p ^ n) f).roots.map (iterateFrobenius R p n) ≤ p ^ n • f.roots := by
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Perfect.lean | 239 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Denumerable
/-!
# Equivalences involving `List`-like types
This file defines some additional constructive equivalences using `Encodable` and the pairing
function on `ℕ`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Multiset.sort
open List
open Nat List
namespace Equiv
/-- An equivalence between `α` and `β` generates an equivalence between `List α` and `List β`. -/
def listEquivOfEquiv {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : List α ≃ List β where
toFun := List.map e
invFun := List.map e.symm
left_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.symm_comp_self, List.map_id]
right_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.self_comp_symm, List.map_id]
end Equiv
namespace Encodable
variable {α : Type*}
section List
variable [Encodable α]
/-- Explicit encoding function for `List α` -/
def encodeList : List α → ℕ
| [] => 0
| a :: l => succ (pair (encode a) (encodeList l))
/-- Explicit decoding function for `List α` -/
def decodeList : ℕ → Option (List α)
| 0 => some []
| succ v =>
match unpair v, unpair_right_le v with
| (v₁, v₂), h =>
have : v₂ < succ v := lt_succ_of_le h
(· :: ·) <$> decode (α := α) v₁ <*> decodeList v₂
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `List α`. This uses the `pair` and `unpair` functions from
`Data.Nat.Pairing`. -/
instance _root_.List.encodable : Encodable (List α) :=
⟨encodeList, decodeList, fun l => by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp [encodeList, decodeList, unpair_pair, encodek, *]⟩
instance _root_.List.countable {α : Type*} [Countable α] : Countable (List α) := by
haveI := Encodable.ofCountable α
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem encode_list_nil : encode (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem encode_list_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
encode (a :: l) = succ (pair (encode a) (encode l)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem decode_list_zero : decode (α := List α) 0 = some [] :=
show decodeList 0 = some [] by rw [decodeList]
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- This is a false positive in the unusedHavesSuffices linter.
theorem decode_list_succ (v : ℕ) :
decode (α := List α) (succ v) =
(· :: ·) <$> decode (α := α) v.unpair.1 <*> decode (α := List α) v.unpair.2 :=
show decodeList (succ v) = _ by
rcases e : unpair v with ⟨v₁, v₂⟩
simp [decodeList, e]; rfl
theorem length_le_encode : ∀ l : List α, length l ≤ encode l
| [] => Nat.zero_le _
| _ :: l => succ_le_succ <| (length_le_encode l).trans (right_le_pair _ _)
end List
/-! These two lemmas are not about lists, but are convenient to keep here and don't
require `Finset.sort`. -/
/-- If `α` is countable, then so is `Multiset α`. -/
instance _root_.Multiset.countable [Countable α] : Countable (Multiset α) :=
Quotient.countable
/-- If `α` is countable, then so is `Finset α`. -/
instance _root_.Finset.countable [Countable α] : Countable (Finset α) :=
Finset.val_injective.countable
/-- A listable type with decidable equality is encodable. -/
def encodableOfList [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ l) : Encodable α :=
⟨fun a => idxOf a l, (l[·]?), fun _ => getElem?_idxOf (H _)⟩
/-- A finite type is encodable. Because the encoding is not unique, we wrap it in `Trunc` to
preserve computability. -/
def _root_.Fintype.truncEncodable (α : Type*) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] : Trunc (Encodable α) :=
@Quot.recOnSubsingleton _ _ (fun s : Multiset α => (∀ x : α, x ∈ s) → Trunc (Encodable α)) _
Finset.univ.1 (fun l H => Trunc.mk <| encodableOfList l H) Finset.mem_univ
/-- A noncomputable way to arbitrarily choose an ordering on a finite type.
It is not made into a global instance, since it involves an arbitrary choice.
This can be locally made into an instance with `attribute [local instance] Fintype.toEncodable`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.Fintype.toEncodable (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Encodable α := by
classical exact (Fintype.truncEncodable α).out
end Encodable
namespace Denumerable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β]
open Encodable
section List
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- This is a false positive in the unusedHavesSuffices linter.
theorem denumerable_list_aux : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ a ∈ @decodeList α _ n, encodeList a = n
| 0 => by rw [decodeList]; exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
| succ v => by
rcases e : unpair v with ⟨v₁, v₂⟩
have h := unpair_right_le v
rw [e] at h
rcases have : v₂ < succ v := lt_succ_of_le h
denumerable_list_aux v₂ with
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [Option.mem_def] at h₁
use ofNat α v₁ :: a
simp [decodeList, e, h₂, h₁, encodeList, pair_unpair' e]
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `List α`. -/
instance denumerableList : Denumerable (List α) :=
⟨denumerable_list_aux⟩
@[simp]
theorem list_ofNat_zero : ofNat (List α) 0 = [] := by rw [← @encode_list_nil α, ofNat_encode]
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- This is a false positive in the unusedHavesSuffices linter.
theorem list_ofNat_succ (v : ℕ) :
ofNat (List α) (succ v) = ofNat α v.unpair.1 :: ofNat (List α) v.unpair.2 :=
ofNat_of_decode <|
show decodeList (succ v) = _ by
rcases e : unpair v with ⟨v₁, v₂⟩
simp [decodeList, e]
rw [show decodeList v₂ = decode (α := List α) v₂ from rfl, decode_eq_ofNat, Option.seq_some]
end List
end Denumerable
namespace Equiv
/-- A list on a unique type is equivalent to ℕ by sending each list to its length. -/
@[simps!]
def listUniqueEquiv (α : Type*) [Unique α] : List α ≃ ℕ where
toFun := List.length
invFun n := List.replicate n default
left_inv u := List.length_injective (by simp)
right_inv n := List.length_replicate
/-- The type lists on unit is canonically equivalent to the natural numbers. -/
@[deprecated listUniqueEquiv (since := "2025-02-17")]
def listUnitEquiv : List Unit ≃ ℕ :=
listUniqueEquiv _
/-- `List ℕ` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def listNatEquivNat : List ℕ ≃ ℕ :=
Denumerable.eqv _
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `ℕ`, then `List α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def listEquivSelfOfEquivNat {α : Type*} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : List α ≃ α :=
calc
List α ≃ List ℕ := listEquivOfEquiv e
_ ≃ ℕ := listNatEquivNat
_ ≃ α := e.symm
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/List.lean | 305 | 309 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MatrixPolynomialAlgebra
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
We define characteristic polynomials of matrices and
prove the Cayley–Hamilton theorem over arbitrary commutative rings.
See the file `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Coeff.lean` for corollaries of this theorem.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.charpoly` is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix.
## Implementation details
We follow a nice proof from http://drorbn.net/AcademicPensieve/2015-12/CayleyHamilton.pdf
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace Matrix
open Finset Matrix Polynomial
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable (M₁₁ : Matrix m m R) (M₁₂ : Matrix m n R) (M₂₁ : Matrix n m R) (M₂₂ M : Matrix n n R)
variable (i j : n)
/-- The "characteristic matrix" of `M : Matrix n n R` is the matrix of polynomials $t I - M$.
The determinant of this matrix is the characteristic polynomial.
-/
def charmatrix (M : Matrix n n R) : Matrix n n R[X] :=
Matrix.scalar n (X : R[X]) - (C : R →+* R[X]).mapMatrix M
theorem charmatrix_apply :
charmatrix M i j = (Matrix.diagonal fun _ : n => X) i j - C (M i j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem charmatrix_apply_eq : charmatrix M i i = (X : R[X]) - C (M i i) := by
simp only [charmatrix, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, sub_apply, scalar_apply, map_apply,
diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem charmatrix_apply_ne (h : i ≠ j) : charmatrix M i j = -C (M i j) := by
simp only [charmatrix, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, sub_apply, scalar_apply, diagonal_apply_ne _ h,
map_apply, sub_eq_neg_self]
theorem matPolyEquiv_charmatrix : matPolyEquiv (charmatrix M) = X - C M := by
ext k i j
simp only [matPolyEquiv_coeff_apply, coeff_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
rw [charmatrix_apply_eq, coeff_sub]
simp only [coeff_X, coeff_C]
split_ifs <;> simp
· rw [charmatrix_apply_ne _ _ _ h, coeff_X, coeff_neg, coeff_C, coeff_C]
split_ifs <;> simp [h]
theorem charmatrix_reindex (e : n ≃ m) :
charmatrix (reindex e e M) = reindex e e (charmatrix M) := by
ext i j x
by_cases h : i = j
all_goals simp [h]
lemma charmatrix_map (M : Matrix n n R) (f : R →+* S) :
charmatrix (M.map f) = (charmatrix M).map (Polynomial.map f) := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h, charmatrix, diagonal]
lemma charmatrix_fromBlocks :
charmatrix (fromBlocks M₁₁ M₁₂ M₂₁ M₂₂) =
fromBlocks (charmatrix M₁₁) (- M₁₂.map C) (- M₂₁.map C) (charmatrix M₂₂) := by
simp only [charmatrix]
ext (i|i) (j|j) : 2 <;> simp [diagonal]
-- TODO: importing block triangular here is somewhat expensive, if more lemmas about it are added
-- to this file, it may be worth extracting things out to Charpoly/Block.lean
@[simp]
lemma charmatrix_blockTriangular_iff {α : Type*} [Preorder α] {M : Matrix n n R} {b : n → α} :
M.charmatrix.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular b := by
rw [charmatrix, scalar_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, (blockTriangular_diagonal _).sub_iff_right]
simp [BlockTriangular]
alias ⟨BlockTriangular.of_charmatrix, BlockTriangular.charmatrix⟩ := charmatrix_blockTriangular_iff
/-- The characteristic polynomial of a matrix `M` is given by $\det (t I - M)$.
-/
def charpoly (M : Matrix n n R) : R[X] :=
(charmatrix M).det
|
theorem charpoly_reindex (e : n ≃ m)
(M : Matrix n n R) : (reindex e e M).charpoly = M.charpoly := by
unfold Matrix.charpoly
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Basic.lean | 103 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AsSubring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Basic
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `ValuationSubring K`.
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (K : Type u) [Field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`.
This is equivalent to being maximal in the domination order
of local subrings (the stacks project definition). See `LocalSubring.isMax_iff`.
-/
structure ValuationSubring extends Subring K where
mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
instance : SetLike (ValuationSubring K) K where
coe A := A.toSubring
coe_injective' := by
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
replace h := SetLike.coe_injective' h
congr
theorem mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring (x : K) : x ∈ A.toSubring ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[ext]
theorem ext (A B : ValuationSubring K) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := SetLike.ext h
theorem zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.one_mem
theorem add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.toSubring.add_mem
theorem mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.toSubring.mul_mem
theorem neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → -x ∈ A := A.toSubring.neg_mem
theorem mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
instance : SubringClass (ValuationSubring K) K where
zero_mem := zero_mem
add_mem {_} a b := add_mem _ a b
one_mem := one_mem
mul_mem {_} a b := mul_mem _ a b
neg_mem {_} x := neg_mem _ x
theorem toSubring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubring : ValuationSubring K → Subring K) :=
fun x y h => by cases x; cases y; congr
instance : CommRing A :=
show CommRing A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : IsDomain A :=
show IsDomain A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : Top (ValuationSubring K) :=
Top.mk <| { (⊤ : Subring K) with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun _ => Or.inl trivial }
theorem mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : ValuationSubring K) :=
trivial
theorem le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := fun _a _ha => mem_top _
instance : OrderTop (ValuationSubring K) where
top := ⊤
le_top := le_top
instance : Inhabited (ValuationSubring K) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : ValuationRing A where
cond' a b := by
by_cases h : (b : K) = 0
· use 0
left
ext
simp [h]
by_cases h : (a : K) = 0
· use 0; right
ext
simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem (a / b) with hh | hh
· use ⟨a / b, hh⟩
right
ext
field_simp
· rw [show (a / b : K)⁻¹ = b / a by field_simp] at hh
use ⟨b / a, hh⟩
left
ext
field_simp
instance : Algebra A K :=
show Algebra A.toSubring K by infer_instance
-- Porting note: Somehow it cannot find this instance and I'm too lazy to debug. wrong prio?
instance isLocalRing : IsLocalRing A := ValuationRing.isLocalRing A
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (a : A) : algebraMap A K a = a := rfl
instance : IsFractionRing A K where
map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(Units.mk0 (y : K) fun c => nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hy <| Subtype.ext c).isUnit
surj' z := by
by_cases h : z = 0; · use (0, 1); simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh | hh
· use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1); simp
· refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, ?_⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel₀ h⟩
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun c => h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg Subtype.val c))
exists_of_eq {a b} h := ⟨1, by ext; simpa using h⟩
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.ValueGroup A K
-- The `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A) := by
unfold ValueGroup
infer_instance
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : Valuation K A.ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.valuation A K
instance inhabitedValueGroup : Inhabited A.ValueGroup := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
theorem valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
theorem mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h
ha ▸ a.2
theorem valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, fun ha => A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
theorem valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x :=
Quotient.eq''
theorem valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem valuation_surjective : Function.Surjective A.valuation := Quot.mk_surjective
theorem valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 := by
rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff]; use a; simp
theorem valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : IsUnit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨fun h => A.valuation_unit h.unit, fun h => by
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0 := by
intro c
rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h
exact zero_ne_one h
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A := by rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one]
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩; ext; field_simp⟩
theorem valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
theorem valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 := by
rw [IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal]
dsimp [nonunits]; rw [valuation_eq_one_iff]
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm
/-- A subring `R` of `K` such that for all `x : K` either `x ∈ R` or `x⁻¹ ∈ R` is
a valuation subring of `K`. -/
def ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ R with mem_or_inv_mem' := hR }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) (x : K) :
x ∈ ofSubring R hR ↔ x ∈ R :=
Iff.refl _
/-- An overring of a valuation ring is a valuation ring. -/
def ofLE (R : ValuationSubring K) (S : Subring K) (h : R.toSubring ≤ S) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ S with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun x => (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).imp (@h x) (@h _) }
section Order
instance : SemilatticeSup (ValuationSubring K) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (ValuationSubring K)) with
sup := fun R S => ofLE R (R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) <| le_sup_left
le_sup_left := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_left : R.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
le_sup_right := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_right : S.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
sup_le := fun R S T hR hT _ hx => (sup_le hR hT : R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring ≤ T.toSubring) hx }
/-- The ring homomorphism induced by the partial order. -/
def inclusion (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R →+* S :=
Subring.inclusion h
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from a valuation ring to its field of fractions. -/
def subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : R →+* K :=
Subring.subtype R.toSubring
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply {R : ValuationSubring K} (x : R) :
R.subtype x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective (R : ValuationSubring K) :
Function.Injective R.subtype :=
R.toSubring.subtype_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : ⇑(subtype R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
/-- The canonical map on value groups induced by a coarsening of valuation rings. -/
def mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R.ValueGroup →*₀ S.ValueGroup where
toFun := Quotient.map' id fun _ _ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨Units.map (R.inclusion S h).toMonoidHom u, hu⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl
@[mono]
theorem monotone_mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Monotone (R.mapOfLE S h) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩; exact ⟨R.inclusion S h a, ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_comp_valuation (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
R.mapOfLE S h ∘ R.valuation = S.valuation := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_valuation_apply (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) (x : K) :
R.mapOfLE S h (R.valuation x) = S.valuation x := rfl
/-- The ideal corresponding to a coarsening of a valuation ring. -/
def idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Ideal R :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap (R.inclusion S h)
instance prime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : (idealOfLE R S h).IsPrime :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap_isPrime _
/-- The coarsening of a valuation ring associated to a prime ideal. -/
def ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : ValuationSubring K :=
ofLE A (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors).toSubring
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <|
Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
instance ofPrimeAlgebra (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
Algebra A (A.ofPrime P) :=
Subalgebra.algebra (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_scalar_tower (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
letI : SMul A (A.ofPrime P) := SMulZeroClass.toSMul
IsScalarTower A (A.ofPrime P) K :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra' A K K
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_localization (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (A.ofPrime P) P := by
apply
Localization.subalgebra.isLocalization_ofField K P.primeCompl
P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors
theorem le_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : A ≤ ofPrime A P :=
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <| Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
theorem ofPrime_valuation_eq_one_iff_mem_primeCompl (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A)
[P.IsPrime] (x : A) : (ofPrime A P).valuation x = 1 ↔ x ∈ P.primeCompl := by
rw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.isUnit_to_map_iff (A.ofPrime P) P x, valuation_eq_one_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem idealOfLE_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
idealOfLE A (ofPrime A P) (le_ofPrime A P) = P := by
refine Ideal.ext (fun x => ?_)
apply IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff
exact isLocalRing (ofPrime A P)
@[simp]
theorem ofPrime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
ofPrime R (idealOfLE R S h) = S := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, r, hr, rfl⟩; apply mul_mem; · exact h a.2
· rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, ← inv_one, inv_le_inv₀]
· exact not_lt.1 ((not_iff_not.2 <| valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hr)
· simpa [Valuation.pos_iff] using fun hr₀ ↦ hr₀ ▸ hr <| Ideal.zero_mem (R.idealOfLE S h)
· exact zero_lt_one
· intro hx; by_cases hr : x ∈ R; · exact R.le_ofPrime _ hr
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => hr (by rw [h]; exact R.zero_mem)
replace hr := (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).resolve_left hr
refine ⟨1, ⟨x⁻¹, hr⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [Ideal.primeCompl, Submonoid.mem_mk, Subsemigroup.mem_mk, Set.mem_compl_iff,
SetLike.mem_coe, idealOfLE, Ideal.mem_comap, IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, mem_nonunits_iff,
not_not]
change IsUnit (⟨x⁻¹, h hr⟩ : S)
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (⟨x, hx⟩ : S)
ext; field_simp
· field_simp
theorem ofPrime_le_of_le (P Q : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] [Q.IsPrime] (h : P ≤ Q) :
ofPrime A Q ≤ ofPrime A P := fun _x ⟨a, s, hs, he⟩ => ⟨a, s, fun c => hs (h c), he⟩
theorem idealOfLE_le_of_le (R S : ValuationSubring K) (hR : A ≤ R) (hS : A ≤ S) (h : R ≤ S) :
idealOfLE A S hS ≤ idealOfLE A R hR := fun x hx =>
(valuation_lt_one_iff R _).2
(by
by_contra c; push_neg at c; replace c := monotone_mapOfLE R S h c
rw [(mapOfLE _ _ _).map_one, mapOfLE_valuation_apply] at c
apply not_le_of_lt ((valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hx) c)
/-- The equivalence between coarsenings of a valuation ring and its prime ideals. -/
@[simps apply]
def primeSpectrumEquiv : PrimeSpectrum A ≃ {S // A ≤ S} where
toFun P := ⟨ofPrime A P.asIdeal, le_ofPrime _ _⟩
invFun S := ⟨idealOfLE _ S S.2, inferInstance⟩
left_inv P := by ext1; simp
| right_inv S := by ext1; simp
/-- An ordered variant of `primeSpectrumEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def primeSpectrumOrderEquiv : (PrimeSpectrum A)ᵒᵈ ≃o {S // A ≤ S} :=
{ OrderDual.ofDual.trans (primeSpectrumEquiv A) with
map_rel_iff' {a b} :=
⟨a.rec <| fun a => b.rec <| fun b => fun h => by
simp only [OrderDual.toDual_le_toDual]
dsimp at h
have := idealOfLE_le_of_le A _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [idealOfLE_ofPrime, idealOfLE_ofPrime] at this
all_goals exact le_ofPrime A (PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal _),
fun h => by apply ofPrime_le_of_le; exact h⟩ }
instance le_total_ideal : IsTotal {S // A ≤ S} LE.le := by
classical
let _ : IsTotal (PrimeSpectrum A) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ => LE.isTotal.total x y⟩
exact ⟨(primeSpectrumOrderEquiv A).symm.toRelEmbedding.isTotal.total⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationSubring.lean | 342 | 360 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `LinearMap.toMatrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `Matrix κ ι R`
* `Matrix.toLin`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`
to `Matrix m n R` (with the standard basis on `m → R` and `n → R`)
* `Matrix.toLin'`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix'`
* `algEquivMatrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `Matrix n n R`
## Issues
This file was originally written without attention to non-commutative rings,
and so mostly only works in the commutative setting. This should be fixed.
In particular, `Matrix.mulVec` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R)`
while `Matrix.vecMul` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`.
At present, the first equivalence is developed in detail but only for commutative rings
(and we omit the distinction between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`),
while the second equivalence is developed only in brief, but for not-necessarily-commutative rings.
Naming is slightly inconsistent between the two developments.
In the original (commutative) development `linear` is abbreviated to `lin`,
although this is not consistent with the rest of mathlib.
In the new (non-commutative) development `linear` is not abbreviated, and declarations use `_right`
to indicate they use the right action of matrices on vectors (via `Matrix.vecMul`).
When the two developments are made uniform, the names should be made uniform, too,
by choosing between `linear` and `lin` consistently,
and (presumably) adding `_left` where necessary.
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.vecMul M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m]
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M.row) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_single, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.single, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, row_def]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [Ring R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R M.row := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply, row_def]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [Ring R] {A : Matrix m m R}
[DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) : LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [← Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.vecMul_injective_of_isUnit ha
section
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- Linear maps `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Matrix m n R`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication.
-/
def LinearMap.toMatrixRight' : ((m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] Matrix m n R where
toFun f i j := f (single R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1) j
invFun := Matrix.vecMulLinear
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R m).ext
intro j; ext i
simp
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to a linear map `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication. -/
abbrev Matrix.toLinearMapRight' [DecidableEq m] : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : m → R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight') M v = v ᵥ* M := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) =
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N).comp (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _x ↦ (vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) (x) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) x =
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M x) :=
(vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (1 : Matrix m m R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp [Module.End.one_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `n → A`
and `m → A` corresponding to `M.vecMul` and `M'.vecMul`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinearEquivRight'OfInv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n R}
{M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] m → R :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrixRight'.symm M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply] }
end
end ToMatrixRight
/-!
From this point on, we only work with commutative rings,
and fail to distinguish between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`.
This should eventually be remedied.
-/
section mulVec
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.mulVec M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R where
toFun := M.mulVec
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_add _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_smul _ _ _
theorem Matrix.coe_mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.mulVecLin : _ → _) = M.mulVec := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_apply [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
M.mulVecLin v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_zero [Fintype n] : Matrix.mulVecLin (0 : Matrix m n R) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext zero_mulVec
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_add [Fintype n] (M N : Matrix m n R) :
(M + N).mulVecLin = M.mulVecLin + N.mulVecLin :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ add_mulVec _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_transpose [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.mulVecLin = M.vecMulLinear := by
ext; simp [mulVec_transpose]
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_transpose [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.vecMulLinear = M.mulVecLin := by
ext; simp [vecMul_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(M.submatrix f₁ e₂).mulVecLin = funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ submatrix_mulVec_equiv _ _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(reindex e₁ e₂ M).mulVecLin =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ
M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ ↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_one [DecidableEq n] :
Matrix.mulVecLin (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext; simp [Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_mul [Fintype m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.mulVecLin (M * N) = (Matrix.mulVecLin M).comp (Matrix.mulVecLin N) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ (mulVec_mulVec _ _ _).symm
theorem Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix m n R} :
(LinearMap.ker M.mulVecLin) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 := by
simp only [Submodule.eq_bot_iff, LinearMap.mem_ker, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply]
theorem Matrix.range_mulVecLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.mulVecLin = span R (range M.col) := by
rw [← vecMulLinear_transpose, range_vecMulLinear, row_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.mulVec ↔ LinearIndependent R M.col := by
change Function.Injective (fun x ↦ _) ↔ _
simp_rw [← M.vecMul_transpose, vecMul_injective_iff, row_transpose]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_cols_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Fintype m]
{A : Matrix m m R} [DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) :
LinearIndependent R A.col := by
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.mulVec_injective_of_isUnit ha
end mulVec
section ToMatrix'
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `Matrix m n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R where
toFun f := of fun i j ↦ f (Pi.single j 1) i
invFun := Matrix.mulVecLin
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.mulVec_single_one, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R n).ext
intro j; ext i
simp only [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single_one,
Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, of_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, of_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`.
Note that the forward-direction does not require `DecidableEq` and is `Matrix.vecMulLin`. -/
def Matrix.toLin' : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply' (M : Matrix m n R) : Matrix.toLin' M = M.mulVecLin :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_symm :
(Matrix.toLin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) : LinearMap.toMatrix' (Matrix.toLin' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, of_apply]
congr! with i
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, Pi.single_eq_same]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) : Matrix.toLin' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_one : Matrix.toLin' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_id : LinearMap.toMatrix' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 := by
ext
rw [Matrix.one_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply, id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_one : LinearMap.toMatrix' (1 : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M * N) = (Matrix.toLin' M).comp (Matrix.toLin' N) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_submatrix [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M.submatrix f₁ e₂) =
funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.toLin'_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_reindex [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (reindex e₁ e₂ M) =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex _ _ _
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin'_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply` -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin' (M * N) x = Matrix.toLin' M (Matrix.toLin' N x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, LinearMap.comp_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R)
(g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f.comp g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g := by
suffices f.comp g = Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g) by
rw [this, LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin']
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix', Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix']
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp f g
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (algebraMap R (Module.End R (n → R)) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem Matrix.ker_toLin'_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 :=
Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff
theorem Matrix.range_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range (Matrix.toLin' M) = span R (range M.col) :=
Matrix.range_mulVecLin _
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `m → A`
and `n → A` corresponding to `M.mulVec` and `M'.mulVec`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLin'OfInv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R :=
{ Matrix.toLin' M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLin' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLin' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply] }
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `Matrix n n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv LinearMap.toMatrix' LinearMap.toMatrix'_one LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul
/-- A `Matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_toLinAlgEquiv' (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M) = M :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 433 | 435 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (ofNat(n) : PartENat) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
@[simp]
| theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 543 | 544 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
/-!
# Contents
In this file we work with *contents*. A content `λ` is a function from a certain class of subsets
(such as the compact subsets) to `ℝ≥0` that is
* additive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are disjoint sets in the domain of `λ`,
then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) = λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* subadditive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) ≤ λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* monotone: If `K₁ ⊆ K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁) ≤ λ(K₂)`.
We show that:
* Given a content `λ` on compact sets, let us define a function `λ*` on open sets, by letting
`λ* U` be the supremum of `λ K` for `K` included in `U`. This is a countably subadditive map that
vanishes at `∅`. In Halmos (1950) this is called the *inner content* `λ*` of `λ`, and formalized
as `innerContent`.
* Given an inner content, we define an outer measure `μ*`, by letting `μ* E` be the infimum of
`λ* U` over the open sets `U` containing `E`. This is indeed an outer measure. It is formalized
as `outerMeasure`.
* Restricting this outer measure to Borel sets gives a regular measure `μ`.
We define bundled contents as `Content`.
In this file we only work on contents on compact sets, and inner contents on open sets, and both
contents and inner contents map into the extended nonnegative reals. However, in other applications
other choices can be made, and it is not a priori clear what the best interface should be.
## Main definitions
For `μ : Content G`, we define
* `μ.innerContent` : the inner content associated to `μ`.
* `μ.outerMeasure` : the outer measure associated to `μ`.
* `μ.measure` : the Borel measure associated to `μ`.
These definitions are given for spaces which are R₁.
The resulting measure `μ.measure` is always outer regular by design.
When the space is locally compact, `μ.measure` is also regular.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_(measure_theory)>
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {G : Type w} [TopologicalSpace G]
/-- A content is an additive function on compact sets taking values in `ℝ≥0`. It is a device
from which one can define a measure. -/
structure Content (G : Type w) [TopologicalSpace G] where
/-- The underlying additive function -/
toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0
mono' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂ → toFun K₁ ≤ toFun K₂
sup_disjoint' :
∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂ → IsClosed (K₁ : Set G) → IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)
→ toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
sup_le' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
instance : Inhabited (Content G) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
mono' := by simp
sup_disjoint' := by simp
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
namespace Content
instance : FunLike (Content G) (Compacts G) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ s := μ.toFun s
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨μ, _, _⟩ ⟨v, _, _⟩ h; congr!; ext s : 1; exact ENNReal.coe_injective <| congr_fun h s
variable (μ : Content G)
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_toNNReal_apply (K : Compacts G) : μ.toFun K = (μ K).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mk_apply (toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0) (mono' sup_disjoint' sup_le') (K : Compacts G) :
mk toFun mono' sup_disjoint' sup_le' K = toFun K := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_ne_top {K : Compacts G} : μ K ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[deprecated toFun_eq_toNNReal_apply (since := "2025-02-11")]
theorem apply_eq_coe_toFun (K : Compacts G) : μ K = μ.toFun K :=
rfl
theorem mono (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ := by
simpa using μ.mono' _ _ h
theorem sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂)
(h₁ : IsClosed (K₁ : Set G)) (h₂ : IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simpa [toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, ← toNNReal_add] using μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h h₁ h₂
theorem sup_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simpa [← toNNReal_add] using μ.sup_le' _ _
theorem lt_top (K : Compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem empty : μ ⊥ = 0 := by simpa [toNNReal_eq_zero_iff] using μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥
/-- Constructing the inner content of a content. From a content defined on the compact sets, we
obtain a function defined on all open sets, by taking the supremum of the content of all compact
subsets. -/
def innerContent (U : Opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (K : Compacts G) (_ : (K : Set G) ⊆ U), μ K
theorem le_innerContent (K : Compacts G) (U : Opens G) (h2 : (K : Set G) ⊆ U) :
μ K ≤ μ.innerContent U :=
le_iSup_of_le K <| le_iSup (fun _ ↦ (μ.toFun K : ℝ≥0∞)) h2
theorem innerContent_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (h2 : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K :=
iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ _ (Subset.trans hK' h2)
theorem innerContent_of_isCompact {K : Set G} (h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : IsOpen K) :
μ.innerContent ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK') (μ.le_innerContent _ _ Subset.rfl)
theorem innerContent_bot : μ.innerContent ⊥ = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
rw [← μ.empty]
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
have : K = ⊥ := by
ext1
rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, Compacts.coe_bot]
rw [this]
/-- This is "unbundled", because that is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_mono ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
theorem innerContent_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.innerContent U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K + ε := by
have h'ε := ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε
rcases le_or_lt (μ.innerContent U) ε with h | h
· exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_add_left h⟩
have h₂ := ENNReal.sub_lt_self hU h.ne_bot h'ε
conv at h₂ => rhs; rw [innerContent]
simp only [lt_iSup_iff] at h₂
rcases h₂ with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩; refine ⟨U, h1U, ?_⟩
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right]; exact le_of_lt h2U
/-- The inner content of a supremum of opens is at most the sum of the individual inner contents. -/
theorem innerContent_iSup_nat [R1Space G] (U : ℕ → Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (⨆ i : ℕ, U i) ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent (U i) := by
have h3 : ∀ (t : Finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → Compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum fun i => μ (K i) := by
intro t K
refine Finset.induction_on t ?_ ?_
· simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sup_empty]
· intro n s hn ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sum_insert hn]
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _)
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
K.isCompact.elim_finite_subcover _ (fun i => (U i).isOpen) (by rwa [← Opens.coe_iSup])
rcases K.isCompact.finite_compact_cover t (SetLike.coe ∘ U) (fun i _ => (U i).isOpen) ht with
⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩
let L : ℕ → Compacts G := fun n => ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _
· ext1
rw [Compacts.coe_finset_sup, Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact h3K'
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum ?_) (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum t)
intro i _
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (L i))
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (h2K' i))
rfl
/-- The inner content of a union of sets is at most the sum of the individual inner contents.
This is the "unbundled" version of `innerContent_iSup_nat`.
It is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_iUnion_nat [R1Space G] ⦃U : ℕ → Set G⦄
(hU : ∀ i : ℕ, IsOpen (U i)) :
μ.innerContent ⟨⋃ i : ℕ, U i, isOpen_iUnion hU⟩ ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent ⟨U i, hU i⟩ := by
have := μ.innerContent_iSup_nat fun i => ⟨U i, hU i⟩
rwa [Opens.iSup_def] at this
theorem innerContent_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(U : Opens G) : μ.innerContent (Opens.comap f U) = μ.innerContent U := by
refine (Compacts.equiv f).surjective.iSup_congr _ fun K => iSup_congr_Prop image_subset_iff ?_
intro hK
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Compacts.equiv]
apply h
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) U) = μ.innerContent U := by
convert μ.innerContent_comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) U
@[to_additive]
theorem innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) (U : Opens G) (hU : (U : Set G).Nonempty) : 0 < μ.innerContent U := by
have : (interior (U : Set G)).Nonempty := by rwa [U.isOpen.interior_eq]
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩
suffices μ K ≤ s.card * μ.innerContent U by
exact (ENNReal.mul_pos_iff.mp <| hK.bot_lt.trans_le this).2
have : (K : Set G) ⊆ ↑(⨆ g ∈ s, Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g : C(G, G)) U) := by
simpa only [Opens.iSup_def, Opens.coe_comap, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine (μ.le_innerContent _ _ this).trans ?_
refine
(rel_iSup_sum μ.innerContent μ.innerContent_bot (· ≤ ·) μ.innerContent_iSup_nat _ _).trans ?_
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent h3, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
theorem innerContent_mono' ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
section OuterMeasure
/-- Extending a content on compact sets to an outer measure on all sets. -/
protected def outerMeasure : OuterMeasure G :=
inducedOuterMeasure (fun U hU => μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩) isOpen_empty μ.innerContent_bot
variable [R1Space G]
theorem outerMeasure_opens (U : Opens G) : μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent U :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq' (fun _ => isOpen_iUnion) μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono U.2
theorem outerMeasure_of_isOpen (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) :
μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (hUK : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens U).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le U K hUK
theorem le_outerMeasure_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outerMeasure K := by
rw [Content.outerMeasure, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf]
· exact le_iInf fun U => le_iInf fun hU => le_iInf <| μ.le_innerContent K ⟨U, hU⟩
· exact fun U hU => isOpen_iUnion hU
· exact μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat
· exact μ.innerContent_mono
theorem outerMeasure_eq_iInf (A : Set G) :
μ.outerMeasure A = ⨅ (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) (_ : A ⊆ U), μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono A
theorem outerMeasure_interior_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ.outerMeasure (interior K) ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens <| Opens.interior K).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le _ _ interior_subset
theorem outerMeasure_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.outerMeasure U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure K + ε := by
rw [μ.outerMeasure_opens] at hU ⊢
rcases μ.innerContent_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K <| add_le_add_right (μ.le_outerMeasure_compacts K) _⟩
theorem outerMeasure_exists_open {A : Set G} (hA : μ.outerMeasure A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U : Opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure A + ε := by
rcases inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono hA
| (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε) with
⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩
theorem outerMeasure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Content.lean | 272 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
theorem next_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
next l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + 1) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt hi))) :=
match l, h, i, hi with
| [], _, i, hi => by simp at hi
| [_], _, _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, 0, h0 => by
have h₁ : (x :: y :: l)[0] = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, i+1, hi => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l)[i+1] ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
rw [next_getElem (y::l), ← getElem_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_getElem]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-015")] alias next_get := next_getElem
-- Unused variable linter incorrectly reports that `h` is unused here.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem prev_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
prev l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + (l.length - 1)) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega))) :=
match l with
| [] => by simp at hi
| x::l => by
induction l generalizing i x with
| nil => simp
| cons y l hl =>
rcases i with (_ | _ | i)
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [zero_add, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero,
List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, length, add_comm,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.mod_self]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl i.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hi) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l)[k] = (x :: y :: l)[k + 1]'(Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
simp
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hi
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨0, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨1, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias prev_get := prev_getElem
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intros
rw [getElem_pmap, getElem_rotate, next_getElem _ h]
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_rotate, getElem_pmap, prev_getElem _ h]
theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
theorem next_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + length tl + 1) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp [this]
theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length := by omega
rw [← getElem_pmap l.next (fun _ h => h) (by simpa using hk)]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse (l := l), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h]
rw [← getElem_pmap l.reverse.prev fun _ h => h]
· simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos'),
Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)]
rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse]
· simp [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hk)]
· simpa
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx := by
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
theorem isRotated_next_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h
rw [next_getElem _ hn]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n k]
rw [next_getElem _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n]
simp [add_assoc]
theorem isRotated_prev_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ← next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)]
exact isRotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
end List
open List
/-- `Cycle α` is the quotient of `List α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def Cycle (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsRotated.setoid α)
namespace Cycle
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The coercion from `List α` to `Cycle α` -/
@[coe] def ofList : List α → Cycle α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Cycle α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Cycle α) = (l₂ : Cycle α) ↔ l₁ ~r l₂ :=
@Quotient.eq _ (IsRotated.setoid _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quot.mk _ l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk''_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quotient.mk'' l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
theorem coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : List α) (a : α) :
(↑(a :: l) : Cycle α) = (↑(l ++ [a]) : Cycle α) :=
Quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : Cycle α :=
([] : List α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑([] : List α) = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_nil (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans isRotated_nil_iff
/-- For consistency with `EmptyCollection (List α)`. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `Cycle`. Use as `induction s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
theorem induction_on {C : Cycle α → Prop} (s : Cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ (a) (l : List α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
refine List.recOn l ?_ ?_ <;> simp only [mk''_eq_coe, coe_nil]
assumption'
/-- For `x : α`, `s : Cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def Mem (s : Cycle α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun _ _ e => propext <| e.mem_iff
instance : Membership α (Cycle α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (↑l : Cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ nil :=
List.not_mem_nil
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Cycle α) := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq''
instance [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (s : Cycle α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l => show Decidable (x ∈ l) from inferInstance
/-- Reverse a `s : Cycle α` by reversing the underlying `List`. -/
nonrec def reverse (s : Cycle α) : Cycle α :=
Quot.map reverse (fun _ _ => IsRotated.reverse) s
@[simp]
theorem reverse_coe (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : Cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
/-- The length of the `s : Cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : Cycle α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s List.length fun _ _ e => e.perm.length_eq
@[simp]
theorem length_coe (l : List α) : length (l : Cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.length_reverse
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def Subsingleton (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
theorem subsingleton_nil : Subsingleton (@nil α) := Nat.zero_le _
theorem length_subsingleton_iff {s : Cycle α} : Subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
theorem Subsingleton.congr {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_hy : y ∈ s), x = y := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero_iff, length_eq_one_iff, Nat.not_lt_zero, false_or] at h
rcases h with (rfl | ⟨z, rfl⟩) <;> simp
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def Nontrivial (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
Nontrivial (l : Cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length := by
rw [Nontrivial]
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp
· simp
· simp only [mem_cons, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, List.length, Ne, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
Nat.zero_le, iff_true]
refine ⟨hd, hd', ?_, by simp⟩
simp only [not_or, mem_cons, nodup_cons] at hl
exact hl.left.left
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [Nontrivial]
theorem length_nontrivial {s : Cycle α} (h : Nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s := by
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hx
· simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy
simp [hx, hy] at hxy
· simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
nonrec def Nodup (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s Nodup fun _l₁ _l₂ e => propext <| e.nodup_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem nodup_nil : Nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_coe_iff {l : List α} : Nodup (l : Cycle α) ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nodup ↔ s.Nodup :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => nodup_reverse
theorem Subsingleton.nodup {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) : Nodup s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := l
· simp
· have : tl = [] := by simpa [Subsingleton, length_eq_zero_iff, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h
simp [this]
theorem Nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : Cycle α} (h : Nodup s) : Nontrivial s ↔ ¬Subsingleton s := by
rw [length_subsingleton_iff]
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn'
simp only [mk''_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Multiset α`.
-/
def toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (↑) fun _ _ h => Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toMultiset = l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toMultiset : nil.toMultiset = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset.card s.toMultiset = s.length :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toMultiset = 0 ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : Cycle α → Cycle β :=
Quotient.map' (List.map f) fun _ _ h => h.map _
@[simp]
theorem map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f ↑l = List.map f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {β : Type*} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Cycle α} :
b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
| Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The `Multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : Cycle α) : Multiset (List α) :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (fun l => (l.cyclicPermutations : Multiset (List α))) fun l₁ l₂ h => by
simpa using h.cyclicPermutations.perm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 636 | 643 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
/-!
# Big operators on a finset in groups with zero
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of finset big operators with groups with
zero.
-/
open Function
variable {ι κ G₀ M₀ : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : ι → M₀} {s : Finset ι}
{i : ι}
lemma prod_eq_zero (hi : i ∈ s) (h : f i = 0) : ∏ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
classical rw [← prod_erase_mul _ _ hi, h, mul_zero]
lemma prod_ite_zero :
(∏ i ∈ s, if p i then f i else 0) = if ∀ i ∈ s, p i then ∏ i ∈ s, f i else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact prod_congr rfl fun i hi => by simp [h i hi]
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨i, hi, hq⟩
exact prod_eq_zero hi (by simp [hq])
lemma prod_boole : ∏ i ∈ s, (ite (p i) 1 0 : M₀) = ite (∀ i ∈ s, p i) 1 0 := by
rw [prod_ite_zero, prod_const_one]
lemma support_prod_subset (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → M₀) :
support (fun x ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i x) ⊆ ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
fun _ hx ↦ Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun _ hi H ↦ hx <| prod_eq_zero hi H
variable [Nontrivial M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma prod_eq_zero_iff : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 0 ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = 0 := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => exact ⟨Not.elim one_ne_zero, fun ⟨_, H, _⟩ => by simp at H⟩
| insert _ _ ha ih => rw [prod_insert ha, mul_eq_zero, exists_mem_insert, ih]
lemma prod_ne_zero_iff : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, prod_eq_zero_iff]
| push_neg; rfl
lemma support_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → M₀) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/GroupWithZero/Finset.lean | 54 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODO
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop
-- The `CompleteLattice, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
-- TODO: this could be replaced with `local infixr:90 " ∘ " => Rel.comp`.
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
| unfold comp
ext x
simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 104 | 108 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem exists₂_comm
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∃ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∃ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@exists_comm (κ₁ _), @exists_comm ι₁]
theorem And.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨h, H⟩ ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq, H⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} (h : b ∨ ∀ x, p x) (x : α) :
b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right fun h₂ ↦ h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ if hq : q then Or.inl hq else
Or.inr fun x ↦ (h x).resolve_left hq, forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_left {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q := by simp [or_comm, Decidable.forall_or_left]
theorem forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_right
theorem Exists.fst {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem Exists.snd {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Prop.exists_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∃ h, p h) ↔ p False ∨ p True :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by_cases (fun H : h₁ ↦ .inr <| by simpa only [H] using h₂)
(fun H ↦ .inl <| by simpa only [H] using h₂), fun h ↦ h.elim (.intro _) (.intro _)⟩
theorem Prop.forall_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∀ h, p h) ↔ p False ∧ p True :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h ↦ by by_cases H : h <;> simpa only [H]⟩
theorem exists_iff_of_forall {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : ∀ h, q h) : (∃ h, q h) ↔ p :=
⟨Exists.fst, fun H ↦ ⟨H, h H⟩⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬p → ¬∃ h' : p, q h' :=
mt Exists.fst
/- See `IsEmpty.exists_iff` for the `False` version of `exists_true_left`. -/
theorem forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 h2)), fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
theorem forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq hp)
lemma imp_congr_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr h₁.to_iff h₂.to_iff)
lemma imp_congr_ctx_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx h₁.to_iff fun hc ↦ (h₂ hc).to_iff)
lemma eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True := propext (iff_true_intro h)
lemma eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False := propext (iff_false_intro h)
-- FIXME: `alias` creates `def Iff.eq := propext` instead of `lemma Iff.eq := propext`
@[nolint defLemma] alias Iff.eq := propext
lemma iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) := propext ⟨propext, Eq.to_iff⟩
-- They were not used in Lean 3 and there are already lemmas with those names in Lean 4
/-- See `IsEmpty.forall_iff` for the `False` version. -/
@[simp] theorem forall_true_left (p : True → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p True.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
end Quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace Classical
-- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open.
/-- Any prop `p` is decidable classically. A shorthand for `Classical.propDecidable`. -/
noncomputable def dec (p : Prop) : Decidable p := by infer_instance
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Any predicate `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decPred (p : α → Prop) : DecidablePred p := by infer_instance
/-- Any relation `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decRel (p : α → α → Prop) : DecidableRel p := by infer_instance
/-- Any type `α` has decidable equality classically. -/
noncomputable def decEq (α : Sort*) : DecidableEq α := by infer_instance
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
noncomputable def existsCases {α C : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h) else H0
theorem some_spec₂ {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃ a, p a} (q : α → Prop)
(hpq : ∀ a, p a → q a) : q (choose h) := hpq _ <| choose_spec _
/-- A version of `byContradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬(α → False)) : α :=
Classical.choice <| (peirce _ False) fun h ↦ (H fun a ↦ h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `Classical.byContradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `Classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬(α → False) → α) : Nonempty α → α :=
fun H ↦ contra H.elim
@[simp] lemma choose_eq (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (· = a) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a := @choose_spec _ (· = a) _
@[simp]
lemma choose_eq' (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (a = ·) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a :=
(@choose_spec _ (a = ·) _).symm
alias axiom_of_choice := axiomOfChoice -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_cases := byCases -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_contradiction := byContradiction -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
-- The remaining theorems in this section were ported from Lean 3,
-- but are currently unused in Mathlib, so have been deprecated.
-- If any are being used downstream, please remove the deprecation.
alias prop_complete := propComplete -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
end Classical
| /-- This function has the same type as `Exists.recOn`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `Exists.recOn` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 738 | 739 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Map
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.LinearMap
/-!
# `map` and `comap` for `Submodule`s
## Main declarations
* `Submodule.map`: The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.comap`: The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.giMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective.
* `Submodule.gciMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective.
## Tags
submodule, subspace, linear map, pushforward, pullback
-/
open Function Pointwise Set
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable (p p' : Submodule R M) (q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂)
variable {x : M}
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' p
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := σ₁₂.surjective c
exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem a hy, map_smulₛₗ f _ _⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : (map f p : Set M₂) = f '' p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_toLinearMap (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : map (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = map f p := rfl
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : M →+ M₂) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid' (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_map {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).map f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MonoidHom.coe_toAdditive_map {G G₂ : Type*} [Group G] [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂)
(s : Subgroup G) :
s.toAddSubgroup.map (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toMultiplicative_map {G G₂ : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddGroup G₂]
(f : G →+ G₂) (s : AddSubgroup G) :
s.toSubgroup.map (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {x : M₂} : x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) {p : Submodule R M} (r : p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
mem_map_of_mem r.prop
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
Submodule.ext fun a => by simp
theorem map_comp [RingHomSurjective σ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective σ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R M) : map (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = map g (map f p) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp only [← image_comp, map_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply]
@[gcongr]
theorem map_mono {f : F} {p p' : Submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : map (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have : ∃ x : M, x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩
ext <| by simp [this, eq_comm]
theorem map_add_le (f g : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) : map (f + g) p ≤ map f p ⊔ map g p := by
rintro x ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact add_mem_sup (mem_map_of_mem hm) (mem_map_of_mem hm)
theorem map_inf_le (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} :
(p ⊓ q).map f ≤ p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
image_inter_subset f p q
theorem map_inf (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} (hf : Injective f) :
(p ⊓ q).map f = p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
lemma map_iInf {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {p : ι → Submodule R M} (f : F) (hf : Injective f) :
(⨅ i, p i).map f = ⨅ i, (p i).map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simpa only [map_coe, iInf_coe] using hf.injOn.image_iInter_eq
theorem range_map_nonempty (N : Submodule R M) :
(Set.range (fun ϕ => Submodule.map ϕ N : (M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) → Submodule R₂ M₂)).Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.mem_range.mpr ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
end
section SemilinearMap
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule by an injective linear map is
linearly equivalent to the original submodule. See also `LinearEquiv.submoduleMap` for a
computable version when `f` has an explicit inverse. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) :
p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] p.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f p i with
map_add' := by
intros
simp only [coe_add, map_add, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl
map_smul' := by
intros
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [coe_smul_of_tower, map_smulₛₗ _, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) (x : p) :
(equivMapOfInjective f i p x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_equivMapOfInjective_symm_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M)
(x : p.map f) : f ((equivMapOfInjective f i p).symm x) = x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply (equivMapOfInjective f i p) x, coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply,
i.eq_iff, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : Submodule R M :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' p
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 added `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul_mem' := fun a x h => by simp [p.smul_mem (σ₁₂ a) h, map_smulₛₗ _] }
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (comap f p : Set M) = f ⁻¹' p :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comap_coe_toLinearMap (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = comap f p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).comap f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} : x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem comap_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R₃ M₃) :
comap (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = comap f (comap g p) :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem comap_mono {f : F} {q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
theorem le_comap_pow_of_le_comap (p : Submodule R M) {f : M →ₗ[R] M}
(h : p ≤ p.comap f) (k : ℕ) : p ≤ p.comap (f ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [Module.End.one_eq_id]
| succ k ih => simp [Module.End.iterate_succ, comap_comp, h.trans (comap_mono ih)]
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q :=
image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)
| _, _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem map_sup (f : F) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
map f (⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, map f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf (f : F) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap f (⨅ i, p i) = ⨅ i, comap f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
@[simp]
theorem comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext <| by simp
theorem map_comap_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
theorem le_comap_map [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
section submoduleOf
/-- For any `R` submodules `p` and `q`, `p ⊓ q` as a submodule of `q`. -/
def submoduleOf (p q : Submodule R M) : Submodule R q :=
Submodule.comap q.subtype p
/-- If `p ≤ q`, then `p` as a subgroup of `q` is isomorphic to `p`. -/
def submoduleOfEquivOfLe {p q : Submodule R M} (h : p ≤ q) : p.submoduleOf q ≃ₗ[R] p where
toFun m := ⟨m.1, m.2⟩
invFun m := ⟨⟨m.1, h m.2⟩, m.2⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end submoduleOf
section GaloisInsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F}
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
def giMapComap (hf : Surjective f) : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x hx => by
rcases hf x with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_comap]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
variable (hf : Surjective f)
include hf
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊔ q.comap f).map f = p ⊔ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_sujective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊓ q.comap f).map f = p ⊓ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective {p q : Submodule R₂ M₂} : p.comap f ≤ q.comap f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
lemma comap_lt_comap_iff_of_surjective {p q : Submodule R₂ M₂} : p.comap f < q.comap f ↔ p < q := by
apply lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' <;> exact comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective hf
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
variable {p q}
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective (h : q.comap f ≤ p) : q ≤ p.map f :=
map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf q ▸ map_mono h
theorem lt_map_of_comap_lt_of_surjective (h : q.comap f < p) : q < p.map f := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le] at h ⊢; rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
exact h.imp_left (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective hf)
end GaloisInsertion
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F}
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
def gciMapComap (hf : Injective f) : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro y hy hxy
rw [hf.eq_iff] at hxy
rwa [← hxy]
variable (hf : Injective f)
include hf
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (p : Submodule R M) : (p.map f).comap f = p :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊓ q.map f).comap f = p ⊓ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊔ q.map f).comap f = p ⊔ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : p.map f ≤ q.map f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
lemma map_lt_map_iff_of_injective {p q : Submodule R M} :
p.map f < q.map f ↔ p < q := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf,
(map_injective_of_injective hf).ne_iff]
lemma comap_lt_of_lt_map_of_injective {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q < p.map f) : q.comap f < p := by
rw [← map_lt_map_iff_of_injective hf]
exact (map_comap_le _ _).trans_lt h
lemma map_covBy_of_injective {p q : Submodule R M} (h : p ⋖ q) :
p.map f ⋖ q.map f := by
refine ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (map_mono h.1.le) ((map_injective_of_injective hf).ne h.1.ne), ?_⟩
intro P h₁ h₂
refine h.2 ?_ (Submodule.comap_lt_of_lt_map_of_injective hf h₂)
rw [← Submodule.map_lt_map_iff_of_injective hf]
refine h₁.trans_le ?_
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset (.trans h₂.le (Set.image_subset_range _ _))).superset
end GaloisCoinsertion
end SemilinearMap
section OrderIso
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*}
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComapOfBijective [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (hf : Bijective f) : Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ where
toFun := map f
invFun := comap f
left_inv := comap_map_eq_of_injective hf.injective
right_inv := map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf.surjective
map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf.injective _ _
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoMapComap [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) :
Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ := orderIsoMapComapOfBijective f (EquivLike.bijective f)
@[simp]
lemma orderIsoMapComap_symm_apply [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(orderIsoMapComap f).symm p = comap f p :=
rfl
variable [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] {e : F}
variable {p}
@[simp] protected lemma map_eq_bot_iff : p.map e = ⊥ ↔ p = ⊥ := map_eq_bot_iff (orderIsoMapComap e)
@[simp] protected lemma map_eq_top_iff : p.map e = ⊤ ↔ p = ⊤ := map_eq_top_iff (orderIsoMapComap e)
protected lemma map_ne_bot_iff : p.map e ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by simp
protected lemma map_ne_top_iff : p.map e ≠ ⊤ ↔ p ≠ ⊤ := by simp
end OrderIso
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
theorem map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M}
{p' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm (by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀ b : (⊥ : Submodule R M), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ => Subtype.eq <| show b' = 0 from (mem_bot R).1 hb
/-- The infimum of a family of invariant submodule of an endomorphism is also an invariant
submodule. -/
theorem _root_.LinearMap.iInf_invariant {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomSurjective σ] {ι : Sort*}
(f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M) {p : ι → Submodule R M} (hf : ∀ i, ∀ v ∈ p i, f v ∈ p i) :
∀ v ∈ iInf p, f v ∈ iInf p := by
have : ∀ i, (p i).map f ≤ p i := by
rintro i - ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact hf i v hv
suffices (iInf p).map f ≤ iInf p by exact fun v hv => this ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact le_iInf fun i => (Submodule.map_mono (iInf_le p i)).trans (this i)
theorem disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot {p q : Submodule R M} : Disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ := by
rw [← (map_injective_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective)).eq_iff,
map_comap_subtype, map_bot, disjoint_iff]
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (p : Submodule R M)
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
|
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map (-f) p = map f p :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Map.lean | 478 | 480 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, map_smul, hb']⟩
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun _ hb =>
span_induction (hx := hb) h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x _ hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
theorem isFractional_of_fg [IsLocalization S P] {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) :
IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
variable (S) in
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit (R := R) I h
|
variable (S P P')
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 198 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
/-!
# Contents
In this file we work with *contents*. A content `λ` is a function from a certain class of subsets
(such as the compact subsets) to `ℝ≥0` that is
* additive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are disjoint sets in the domain of `λ`,
then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) = λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* subadditive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) ≤ λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* monotone: If `K₁ ⊆ K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁) ≤ λ(K₂)`.
We show that:
* Given a content `λ` on compact sets, let us define a function `λ*` on open sets, by letting
`λ* U` be the supremum of `λ K` for `K` included in `U`. This is a countably subadditive map that
vanishes at `∅`. In Halmos (1950) this is called the *inner content* `λ*` of `λ`, and formalized
as `innerContent`.
* Given an inner content, we define an outer measure `μ*`, by letting `μ* E` be the infimum of
`λ* U` over the open sets `U` containing `E`. This is indeed an outer measure. It is formalized
as `outerMeasure`.
* Restricting this outer measure to Borel sets gives a regular measure `μ`.
We define bundled contents as `Content`.
In this file we only work on contents on compact sets, and inner contents on open sets, and both
contents and inner contents map into the extended nonnegative reals. However, in other applications
other choices can be made, and it is not a priori clear what the best interface should be.
## Main definitions
For `μ : Content G`, we define
* `μ.innerContent` : the inner content associated to `μ`.
* `μ.outerMeasure` : the outer measure associated to `μ`.
* `μ.measure` : the Borel measure associated to `μ`.
These definitions are given for spaces which are R₁.
The resulting measure `μ.measure` is always outer regular by design.
When the space is locally compact, `μ.measure` is also regular.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_(measure_theory)>
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {G : Type w} [TopologicalSpace G]
/-- A content is an additive function on compact sets taking values in `ℝ≥0`. It is a device
from which one can define a measure. -/
structure Content (G : Type w) [TopologicalSpace G] where
/-- The underlying additive function -/
toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0
mono' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂ → toFun K₁ ≤ toFun K₂
sup_disjoint' :
∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂ → IsClosed (K₁ : Set G) → IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)
→ toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
sup_le' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
instance : Inhabited (Content G) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
mono' := by simp
sup_disjoint' := by simp
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
namespace Content
instance : FunLike (Content G) (Compacts G) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ s := μ.toFun s
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨μ, _, _⟩ ⟨v, _, _⟩ h; congr!; ext s : 1; exact ENNReal.coe_injective <| congr_fun h s
variable (μ : Content G)
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_toNNReal_apply (K : Compacts G) : μ.toFun K = (μ K).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mk_apply (toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0) (mono' sup_disjoint' sup_le') (K : Compacts G) :
mk toFun mono' sup_disjoint' sup_le' K = toFun K := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_ne_top {K : Compacts G} : μ K ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[deprecated toFun_eq_toNNReal_apply (since := "2025-02-11")]
theorem apply_eq_coe_toFun (K : Compacts G) : μ K = μ.toFun K :=
rfl
theorem mono (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ := by
simpa using μ.mono' _ _ h
theorem sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂)
(h₁ : IsClosed (K₁ : Set G)) (h₂ : IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simpa [toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, ← toNNReal_add] using μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h h₁ h₂
theorem sup_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simpa [← toNNReal_add] using μ.sup_le' _ _
theorem lt_top (K : Compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem empty : μ ⊥ = 0 := by simpa [toNNReal_eq_zero_iff] using μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥
/-- Constructing the inner content of a content. From a content defined on the compact sets, we
obtain a function defined on all open sets, by taking the supremum of the content of all compact
subsets. -/
def innerContent (U : Opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (K : Compacts G) (_ : (K : Set G) ⊆ U), μ K
theorem le_innerContent (K : Compacts G) (U : Opens G) (h2 : (K : Set G) ⊆ U) :
μ K ≤ μ.innerContent U :=
le_iSup_of_le K <| le_iSup (fun _ ↦ (μ.toFun K : ℝ≥0∞)) h2
theorem innerContent_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (h2 : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K :=
iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ _ (Subset.trans hK' h2)
theorem innerContent_of_isCompact {K : Set G} (h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : IsOpen K) :
μ.innerContent ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK') (μ.le_innerContent _ _ Subset.rfl)
theorem innerContent_bot : μ.innerContent ⊥ = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
rw [← μ.empty]
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
have : K = ⊥ := by
ext1
rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, Compacts.coe_bot]
rw [this]
/-- This is "unbundled", because that is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_mono ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
theorem innerContent_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.innerContent U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K + ε := by
have h'ε := ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε
rcases le_or_lt (μ.innerContent U) ε with h | h
· exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_add_left h⟩
have h₂ := ENNReal.sub_lt_self hU h.ne_bot h'ε
conv at h₂ => rhs; rw [innerContent]
simp only [lt_iSup_iff] at h₂
rcases h₂ with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩; refine ⟨U, h1U, ?_⟩
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right]; exact le_of_lt h2U
/-- The inner content of a supremum of opens is at most the sum of the individual inner contents. -/
theorem innerContent_iSup_nat [R1Space G] (U : ℕ → Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (⨆ i : ℕ, U i) ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent (U i) := by
have h3 : ∀ (t : Finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → Compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum fun i => μ (K i) := by
intro t K
refine Finset.induction_on t ?_ ?_
· simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sup_empty]
· intro n s hn ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sum_insert hn]
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _)
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
K.isCompact.elim_finite_subcover _ (fun i => (U i).isOpen) (by rwa [← Opens.coe_iSup])
rcases K.isCompact.finite_compact_cover t (SetLike.coe ∘ U) (fun i _ => (U i).isOpen) ht with
⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩
let L : ℕ → Compacts G := fun n => ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _
· ext1
rw [Compacts.coe_finset_sup, Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact h3K'
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum ?_) (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum t)
intro i _
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (L i))
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (h2K' i))
rfl
/-- The inner content of a union of sets is at most the sum of the individual inner contents.
This is the "unbundled" version of `innerContent_iSup_nat`.
It is required for the API of `inducedOuterMeasure`. -/
theorem innerContent_iUnion_nat [R1Space G] ⦃U : ℕ → Set G⦄
(hU : ∀ i : ℕ, IsOpen (U i)) :
μ.innerContent ⟨⋃ i : ℕ, U i, isOpen_iUnion hU⟩ ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent ⟨U i, hU i⟩ := by
have := μ.innerContent_iSup_nat fun i => ⟨U i, hU i⟩
rwa [Opens.iSup_def] at this
theorem innerContent_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(U : Opens G) : μ.innerContent (Opens.comap f U) = μ.innerContent U := by
refine (Compacts.equiv f).surjective.iSup_congr _ fun K => iSup_congr_Prop image_subset_iff ?_
intro hK
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Compacts.equiv]
apply h
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) U) = μ.innerContent U := by
convert μ.innerContent_comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) U
@[to_additive]
theorem innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) (U : Opens G) (hU : (U : Set G).Nonempty) : 0 < μ.innerContent U := by
have : (interior (U : Set G)).Nonempty := by rwa [U.isOpen.interior_eq]
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩
suffices μ K ≤ s.card * μ.innerContent U by
exact (ENNReal.mul_pos_iff.mp <| hK.bot_lt.trans_le this).2
have : (K : Set G) ⊆ ↑(⨆ g ∈ s, Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g : C(G, G)) U) := by
simpa only [Opens.iSup_def, Opens.coe_comap, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine (μ.le_innerContent _ _ this).trans ?_
refine
(rel_iSup_sum μ.innerContent μ.innerContent_bot (· ≤ ·) μ.innerContent_iSup_nat _ _).trans ?_
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent h3, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
theorem innerContent_mono' ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
section OuterMeasure
/-- Extending a content on compact sets to an outer measure on all sets. -/
protected def outerMeasure : OuterMeasure G :=
inducedOuterMeasure (fun U hU => μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩) isOpen_empty μ.innerContent_bot
variable [R1Space G]
theorem outerMeasure_opens (U : Opens G) : μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent U :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq' (fun _ => isOpen_iUnion) μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono U.2
theorem outerMeasure_of_isOpen (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) :
μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (hUK : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens U).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le U K hUK
theorem le_outerMeasure_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outerMeasure K := by
rw [Content.outerMeasure, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf]
· exact le_iInf fun U => le_iInf fun hU => le_iInf <| μ.le_innerContent K ⟨U, hU⟩
· exact fun U hU => isOpen_iUnion hU
· exact μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat
· exact μ.innerContent_mono
theorem outerMeasure_eq_iInf (A : Set G) :
μ.outerMeasure A = ⨅ (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) (_ : A ⊆ U), μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono A
theorem outerMeasure_interior_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ.outerMeasure (interior K) ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens <| Opens.interior K).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le _ _ interior_subset
theorem outerMeasure_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.outerMeasure U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure K + ε := by
rw [μ.outerMeasure_opens] at hU ⊢
rcases μ.innerContent_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K <| add_le_add_right (μ.le_outerMeasure_compacts K) _⟩
theorem outerMeasure_exists_open {A : Set G} (hA : μ.outerMeasure A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U : Opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure A + ε := by
rcases inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono hA
(ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε) with
⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩
theorem outerMeasure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
refine inducedOuterMeasure_preimage _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono _
(fun _ => f.isOpen_preimage) ?_
intro s hs
convert μ.innerContent_comap f h ⟨s, hs⟩
theorem outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace G]
{K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) :
μ.outerMeasure K < ∞ := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨F, h1F, h2F⟩
calc
μ.outerMeasure K ≤ μ.outerMeasure (interior F) := measure_mono h2F
_ ≤ μ ⟨F, h1F⟩ := by
apply μ.outerMeasure_le ⟨interior F, isOpen_interior⟩ ⟨F, h1F⟩ interior_subset
_ < ⊤ := μ.lt_top _
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure ((g * ·) ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
convert μ.outerMeasure_preimage (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) A
theorem outerMeasure_caratheodory (A : Set G) :
MeasurableSet[μ.outerMeasure.caratheodory] A ↔
∀ U : Opens G, μ.outerMeasure (U ∩ A) + μ.outerMeasure (U \ A) ≤ μ.outerMeasure U := by
rw [Opens.forall]
apply inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory
· apply innerContent_iUnion_nat
· apply innerContent_mono'
@[to_additive]
theorem outerMeasure_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) {U : Set G} (h1U : IsOpen U) (h2U : U.Nonempty) : 0 < μ.outerMeasure U := by
convert μ.innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant h3 K hK ⟨U, h1U⟩ h2U
exact μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, h1U⟩
variable [S : MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
/-- For the outer measure coming from a content, all Borel sets are measurable. -/
theorem borel_le_caratheodory : S ≤ μ.outerMeasure.caratheodory := by
rw [BorelSpace.measurable_eq (α := G)]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le ?_
intro U hU
rw [μ.outerMeasure_caratheodory]
intro U'
rw [μ.outerMeasure_of_isOpen ((U' : Set G) ∩ U) (U'.isOpen.inter hU)]
simp only [innerContent, iSup_subtype']
rw [Opens.coe_mk]
haveI : Nonempty { L : Compacts G // (L : Set G) ⊆ U' ∩ U } := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add]
refine iSup_le ?_
rintro ⟨L, hL⟩
let L' : Compacts G := ⟨closure L, L.isCompact.closure⟩
suffices μ L' + μ.outerMeasure (↑U' \ U) ≤ μ.outerMeasure U' by
have A : μ L ≤ μ L' := μ.mono _ _ subset_closure
exact (add_le_add_right A _).trans this
simp only [subset_inter_iff] at hL
have hL'U : (L' : Set G) ⊆ U := IsCompact.closure_subset_of_isOpen L.2 hU hL.2
have hL'U' : (L' : Set G) ⊆ (U' : Set G) := IsCompact.closure_subset_of_isOpen L.2 U'.2 hL.1
have : ↑U' \ U ⊆ U' \ L' := diff_subset_diff_right hL'U
refine le_trans (add_le_add_left (measure_mono this) _) ?_
rw [μ.outerMeasure_of_isOpen (↑U' \ L') (IsOpen.sdiff U'.2 isClosed_closure)]
simp only [innerContent, iSup_subtype']
| rw [Opens.coe_mk]
haveI : Nonempty { M : Compacts G // (M : Set G) ⊆ ↑U' \ closure L } := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩
rw [ENNReal.add_iSup]
refine iSup_le ?_
rintro ⟨M, hM⟩
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Content.lean | 341 | 345 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
/-!
# The dominated convergence theorem
This file collects various results related to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
for the Bochner integral.
## Main results
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence`:
the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for the Bochner integral
- `MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence`:
the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for series
- `MeasureTheory.integral_tsum`, `MeasureTheory.integral_tsum_of_summable_integral_norm`:
the integral and `tsum`s commute, if the norms of the functions form a summable series
- `intervalIntegral.hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence`: the Lebesgue dominated convergence
theorem for parametric interval integrals
- `intervalIntegral.continuous_of_dominated_interval`: continuity of the interval integral
w.r.t. a parameter
- `intervalIntegral.continuous_primitive` and friends: primitives of interval integrable
measurable functions are continuous
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric
/-!
## The Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for the Bochner integral
-/
section DominatedConvergenceTheorem
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
open scoped Topology Interval
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E G : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- **Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem** provides sufficient conditions under which almost
everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies the convergence of their integrals.
We could weaken the condition `bound_integrable` to require `HasFiniteIntegral bound μ` instead
(i.e. not requiring that `bound` is measurable), but in all applications proving integrability
is easier. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → G} {f : α → G} (bound : α → ℝ)
(F_measurable : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
bound F_measurable bound_integrable h_bound h_lim
· simp [integral, hG]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
theorem tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{F : ι → α → G} {f : α → G} (bound : α → ℝ) (hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_lim
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for series. -/
theorem hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence {ι} [Countable ι] {F : ι → α → G} {f : α → G}
| (bound : ι → α → ℝ) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound n a)
(bound_summable : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Summable fun n => bound n a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable (fun a => ∑' n, bound n a) μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, HasSum (fun n => F n a) (f a)) :
HasSum (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
have hb_nonneg : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ bound n a :=
eventually_countable_forall.2 fun n => (h_bound n).mono fun a => (norm_nonneg _).trans
have hb_le_tsum : ∀ n, bound n ≤ᵐ[μ] fun a => ∑' n, bound n a := by
intro n
filter_upwards [hb_nonneg, bound_summable]
with _ ha0 ha_sum using ha_sum.le_tsum _ fun i _ => ha0 i
have hF_integrable : ∀ n, Integrable (F n) μ := by
refine fun n => bound_integrable.mono' (hF_meas n) ?_
exact EventuallyLE.trans (h_bound n) (hb_le_tsum n)
simp only [HasSum, ← integral_finset_sum _ fun n _ => hF_integrable n]
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
(fun a => ∑' n, bound n a) ?_ ?_ bound_integrable h_lim
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun s => s.aestronglyMeasurable_sum fun n _ => hF_meas n
· filter_upwards with s
filter_upwards [eventually_countable_forall.2 h_bound, hb_nonneg, bound_summable]
with a hFa ha0 has
calc
‖∑ n ∈ s, F n a‖ ≤ ∑ n ∈ s, bound n a := norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun n _ => hFa n
_ ≤ ∑' n, bound n a := has.sum_le_tsum _ (fun n _ => ha0 n)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/DominatedConvergence.lean | 79 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ObjectProperty.ClosedUnderIsomorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Adjunction
/-!
# Bousfield localization
Given a predicate `P : ObjectProperty C` on the objects of a category `C`,
we define `Localization.LeftBousfield.W P : MorphismProperty C`
as the class of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` such that for any `Z : C`
such that `P Z`, the precomposition with `f` induces a bijection
`(Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z)`.
(This construction is part of left Bousfield localization
in the context of model categories.)
When `G ⊣ F` is an adjunction with `F : C ⥤ D` fully faithful, then
`G : D ⥤ C` is a localization functor for the class `W (· ∈ Set.range F.obj)`,
which then identifies to the inverse image by `G` of the class of
isomorphisms in `C`.
## References
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/left+Bousfield+localization+of+model+categories
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
namespace Localization
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace LeftBousfield
section
variable (P : ObjectProperty C)
/-- Given `P : ObjectProperty C`, this is the class of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y`
such that for all `Z : C` such that `P Z`, the precomposition with `f` induces
a bijection `(Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z)`. -/
def W : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
∀ Z, P Z → Function.Bijective (fun (g : _ ⟶ Z) => f ≫ g)
variable {P} in
/-- The bijection `(Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z)` induced by `f : X ⟶ Y` when `LeftBousfield.W P f`
and `P Z`. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def W.homEquiv {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : W P f) (Z : C) (hZ : P Z) :
(Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z) :=
Equiv.ofBijective _ (hf Z hZ)
lemma W_isoClosure : W P.isoClosure = W P := by
ext X Y f
constructor
· intro hf Z hZ
exact hf _ (P.le_isoClosure _ hZ)
· rintro hf Z ⟨Z', hZ', ⟨e⟩⟩
constructor
· intro g₁ g₂ eq
rw [← cancel_mono e.hom]
apply (hf _ hZ').1
simp only [reassoc_of% eq]
· intro g
obtain ⟨a, h⟩ := (hf _ hZ').2 (g ≫ e.hom)
exact ⟨a ≫ e.inv, by simp only [reassoc_of% h, e.hom_inv_id, comp_id]⟩
instance : (W P).IsMultiplicative where
id_mem X Z _ := by simpa [id_comp] using Function.bijective_id
comp_mem f g hf hg Z hZ := by
simpa using Function.Bijective.comp (hf Z hZ) (hg Z hZ)
instance : (W P).HasTwoOutOfThreeProperty where
of_postcomp f g hg hfg Z hZ := by
rw [← Function.Bijective.of_comp_iff _ (hg Z hZ)]
simpa using hfg Z hZ
of_precomp f g hf hfg Z hZ := by
rw [← Function.Bijective.of_comp_iff' (hf Z hZ)]
simpa using hfg Z hZ
lemma W_of_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : W P f := fun Z _ => by
constructor
· intro g₁ g₂ _
simpa only [← cancel_epi f]
· intro g
exact ⟨inv f ≫ g, by simp⟩
lemma W_iff_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hX : P X) (hY : P Y) :
W P f ↔ IsIso f := by
constructor
· intro hf
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := (hf _ hX).2 (𝟙 X)
exact ⟨g, hg, (hf _ hY).1 (by simp only [reassoc_of% hg, comp_id])⟩
· apply W_of_isIso
instance : (W P).RespectsIso where
precomp f (_ : IsIso f) g hg := (W P).comp_mem f g (W_of_isIso _ f) hg
postcomp f (_ : IsIso f) g hg := (W P).comp_mem g f hg (W_of_isIso _ f)
end
section
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : G ⊣ F) [F.Full] [F.Faithful]
include adj
lemma W_adj_unit_app (X : D) : W (· ∈ Set.range F.obj) (adj.unit.app X) := by
rintro _ ⟨Y, rfl⟩
convert ((Functor.FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful F).homEquiv.symm.trans
(adj.homEquiv X Y)).bijective using 1
dsimp [Adjunction.homEquiv]
aesop
lemma W_iff_isIso_map {X Y : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
W (· ∈ Set.range F.obj) f ↔ IsIso (G.map f) := by
rw [← (W (· ∈ Set.range F.obj)).postcomp_iff _ _ (W_adj_unit_app adj Y)]
erw [adj.unit.naturality f]
rw [(W (· ∈ Set.range F.obj)).precomp_iff _ _ (W_adj_unit_app adj X),
W_iff_isIso _ _ ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, rfl⟩]
constructor
· intro h
dsimp at h
exact isIso_of_fully_faithful F (G.map f)
| · intro
rw [Functor.comp_map]
infer_instance
lemma W_eq_inverseImage_isomorphisms :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Bousfield.lean | 132 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Transvections
Transvections are matrices of the form `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`, where `stdBasisMatrix i j c`
is the basic matrix with a `c` at position `(i, j)`. Multiplying by such a transvection on the left
(resp. on the right) amounts to adding `c` times the `j`-th row to the `i`-th row
(resp `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column). Therefore, they are useful to present
algorithms operating on rows and columns.
Transvections are a special case of *elementary matrices* (according to most references, these also
contain the matrices exchanging rows, and the matrices multiplying a row by a constant).
We show that, over a field, any matrix can be written as `L * D * L'`, where `L` and `L'` are
products of transvections and `D` is diagonal. In other words, one can reduce a matrix to diagonal
form by operations on its rows and columns, a variant of Gauss' pivot algorithm.
## Main definitions and results
* `transvection i j c` is the matrix equal to `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`.
* `TransvectionStruct n R` is a structure containing the data of `i, j, c` and a proof that
`i ≠ j`. These are often easier to manipulate than straight matrices, especially in inductive
arguments.
* `exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec` states that any matrix `M` over a field can
be written in the form `t_1 * ... * t_k * D * t'_1 * ... * t'_l`, where `D` is diagonal and
the `t_i`, `t'_j` are transvections.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction` shows that a property which is true for diagonal matrices and
transvections, and invariant under product, is true for all matrices.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero` is the same statement over invertible matrices.
## Implementation details
The proof of the reduction results is done inductively on the size of the matrices, reducing an
`(r + 1) × (r + 1)` matrix to a matrix whose last row and column are zeroes, except possibly for
the last diagonal entry. This step is done as follows.
If all the coefficients on the last row and column are zero, there is nothing to do. Otherwise,
one can put a nonzero coefficient in the last diagonal entry by a row or column operation, and then
subtract this last diagonal entry from the other entries in the last row and column to make them
vanish.
This step is done in the type `Fin r ⊕ Unit`, where `Fin r` is useful to choose arbitrarily some
order in which we cancel the coefficients, and the sum structure is useful to use the formalism of
block matrices.
To proceed with the induction, we reindex our matrices to reduce to the above situation.
-/
universe u₁ u₂
namespace Matrix
variable (n p : Type*) (R : Type u₂) {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
variable [CommRing R]
section Transvection
variable {R n} (i j : n)
/-- The transvection matrix `transvection i j c` is equal to the identity plus `c` at position
`(i, j)`. Multiplying by it on the left (as in `transvection i j c * M`) corresponds to adding
`c` times the `j`-th row of `M` to its `i`-th row. Multiplying by it on the right corresponds
to adding `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column. -/
def transvection (c : R) : Matrix n n R :=
1 + Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c
@[simp]
theorem transvection_zero : transvection i j (0 : R) = 1 := by simp [transvection]
section
/-- A transvection matrix is obtained from the identity by adding `c` times the `j`-th row to
the `i`-th row. -/
theorem updateRow_eq_transvection [Finite n] (c : R) :
updateRow (1 : Matrix n n R) i ((1 : Matrix n n R) i + c • (1 : Matrix n n R) j) =
transvection i j c := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
ext a b
by_cases ha : i = a
· by_cases hb : j = b
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, transvection, add_apply, StdBasisMatrix.apply_same]
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, add_zero, transvection, add_apply, and_false, not_false_eq_true,
StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne]
· simp only [updateRow_ne, transvection, ha, Ne.symm ha, StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne, add_zero,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Ne, not_false_iff, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
mul_zero, false_and, add_apply]
variable [Fintype n]
theorem transvection_mul_transvection_same (h : i ≠ j) (c d : R) :
transvection i j c * transvection i j d = transvection i j (c + d) := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, Matrix.mul_add, h, h.symm, add_smul, add_assoc,
stdBasisMatrix_add]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_same (b : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) i b = M i b + c * M j b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_same (a : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a j = M a j + c * M a i := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (ha : a ≠ i) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, ha]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hb : b ≠ j) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, hb]
@[simp]
theorem det_transvection_of_ne (h : i ≠ j) (c : R) : det (transvection i j c) = 1 := by
rw [← updateRow_eq_transvection i j, det_updateRow_add_smul_self _ h, det_one]
end
variable (R n)
/-- A structure containing all the information from which one can build a nontrivial transvection.
This structure is easier to manipulate than transvections as one has a direct access to all the
relevant fields. -/
structure TransvectionStruct where
(i j : n)
hij : i ≠ j
c : R
instance [Nontrivial n] : Nonempty (TransvectionStruct n R) := by
choose x y hxy using exists_pair_ne n
exact ⟨⟨x, y, hxy, 0⟩⟩
namespace TransvectionStruct
variable {R n}
/-- Associating to a `transvection_struct` the corresponding transvection matrix. -/
def toMatrix (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : Matrix n n R :=
transvection t.i t.j t.c
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_mk (i j : n) (hij : i ≠ j) (c : R) :
TransvectionStruct.toMatrix ⟨i, j, hij, c⟩ = transvection i j c :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem det [Fintype n] (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : det t.toMatrix = 1 :=
det_transvection_of_ne _ _ t.hij _
@[simp]
theorem det_toMatrix_prod [Fintype n] (L : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) :
det (L.map toMatrix).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ IH => simp [IH]
/-- The inverse of a `TransvectionStruct`, designed so that `t.inv.toMatrix` is the inverse of
`t.toMatrix`. -/
@[simps]
protected def inv (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct n R where
i := t.i
j := t.j
hij := t.hij
c := -t.c
section
variable [Fintype n]
theorem inv_mul (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : t.inv.toMatrix * t.toMatrix = 1 := by
rcases t with ⟨_, _, t_hij⟩
simp [toMatrix, transvection_mul_transvection_same, t_hij]
theorem mul_inv (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : t.toMatrix * t.inv.toMatrix = 1 := by
rcases t with ⟨_, _, t_hij⟩
simp [toMatrix, transvection_mul_transvection_same, t_hij]
theorem reverse_inv_prod_mul_prod (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (L.map toMatrix).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
suffices
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (t.inv.toMatrix * t.toMatrix) *
(L.map toMatrix).prod = 1
by simpa [Matrix.mul_assoc]
simpa [inv_mul] using IH
theorem prod_mul_reverse_inv_prod (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.map toMatrix).prod * (L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
suffices
t.toMatrix *
((L.map toMatrix).prod * (L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod) *
t.inv.toMatrix = 1
by simpa [Matrix.mul_assoc]
simp_rw [IH, Matrix.mul_one, t.mul_inv]
/-- `M` is a scalar matrix if it commutes with every nontrivial transvection (elementary matrix). -/
theorem _root_.Matrix.mem_range_scalar_of_commute_transvectionStruct {M : Matrix n n R}
(hM : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n R, Commute t.toMatrix M) :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) := by
refine mem_range_scalar_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix ?_
intro i j hij
simpa [transvection, mul_add, add_mul] using (hM ⟨i, j, hij, 1⟩).eq
theorem _root_.Matrix.mem_range_scalar_iff_commute_transvectionStruct {M : Matrix n n R} :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) ↔ ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n R, Commute t.toMatrix M := by
refine ⟨fun h t => ?_, mem_range_scalar_of_commute_transvectionStruct⟩
rw [mem_range_scalar_iff_commute_stdBasisMatrix] at h
refine (Commute.one_left M).add_left ?_
convert (h _ _ t.hij).smul_left t.c using 1
rw [smul_stdBasisMatrix, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
end
open Sum
/-- Given a `TransvectionStruct` on `n`, define the corresponding `TransvectionStruct` on `n ⊕ p`
using the identity on `p`. -/
def sumInl (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct (n ⊕ p) R where
i := inl t.i
j := inl t.j
hij := by simp [t.hij]
c := t.c
theorem toMatrix_sumInl (t : TransvectionStruct n R) :
(t.sumInl p).toMatrix = fromBlocks t.toMatrix 0 0 1 := by
cases t
ext a b
rcases a with a | a <;> rcases b with b | b
· by_cases h : a = b <;> simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection, h, stdBasisMatrix]
· simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection]
· simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection]
· by_cases h : a = b <;> simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection, h]
@[simp]
theorem sumInl_toMatrix_prod_mul [Fintype n] [Fintype p] (M : Matrix n n R)
(L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) (N : Matrix p p R) :
(L.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl p)).prod * fromBlocks M 0 0 N =
fromBlocks ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M) 0 0 N := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH => simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, IH, toMatrix_sumInl, fromBlocks_multiply]
@[simp]
theorem mul_sumInl_toMatrix_prod [Fintype n] [Fintype p] (M : Matrix n n R)
(L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) (N : Matrix p p R) :
fromBlocks M 0 0 N * (L.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl p)).prod =
fromBlocks (M * (L.map toMatrix).prod) 0 0 N := by
induction L generalizing M N with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH => simp [IH, toMatrix_sumInl, fromBlocks_multiply]
variable {p}
/-- Given a `TransvectionStruct` on `n` and an equivalence between `n` and `p`, define the
corresponding `TransvectionStruct` on `p`. -/
def reindexEquiv (e : n ≃ p) (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct p R where
i := e t.i
j := e t.j
hij := by simp [t.hij]
c := t.c
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype p]
theorem toMatrix_reindexEquiv (e : n ≃ p) (t : TransvectionStruct n R) :
(t.reindexEquiv e).toMatrix = reindexAlgEquiv R _ e t.toMatrix := by
rcases t with ⟨t_i, t_j, _⟩
ext a b
simp only [reindexEquiv, transvection, mul_boole, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, toMatrix_mk,
submatrix_apply, reindex_apply, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
by_cases ha : e t_i = a <;> by_cases hb : e t_j = b <;> by_cases hab : a = b <;>
simp [ha, hb, hab, ← e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, stdBasisMatrix]
theorem toMatrix_reindexEquiv_prod (e : n ≃ p) (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.map (toMatrix ∘ reindexEquiv e)).prod = reindexAlgEquiv R _ e (L.map toMatrix).prod := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
simp only [toMatrix_reindexEquiv, IH, Function.comp_apply, List.prod_cons,
reindexAlgEquiv_apply, List.map]
exact (reindexAlgEquiv_mul R _ _ _ _).symm
end TransvectionStruct
end Transvection
/-!
# Reducing matrices by left and right multiplication by transvections
In this section, we show that any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by left and right
multiplication by transvections (or, equivalently, by elementary operations on lines and columns).
The main step is to kill the last row and column of a matrix in `Fin r ⊕ Unit` with nonzero last
coefficient, by subtracting this coefficient from the other ones. The list of these operations is
recorded in `list_transvec_col M` and `list_transvec_row M`. We have to analyze inductively how
these operations affect the coefficients in the last row and the last column to conclude that they
have the desired effect.
Once this is done, one concludes the reduction by induction on the size
of the matrices, through a suitable reindexing to identify any fintype with `Fin r ⊕ Unit`.
-/
namespace Pivot
variable {R} {r : ℕ} (M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜)
open Unit Sum Fin TransvectionStruct
/-- A list of transvections such that multiplying on the left with these transvections will replace
the last column with zeroes. -/
def listTransvecCol : List (Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
transvection (inl i) (inr unit) <| -M (inl i) (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)
/-- A list of transvections such that multiplying on the right with these transvections will replace
the last row with zeroes. -/
def listTransvecRow : List (Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
transvection (inr unit) (inl i) <| -M (inr unit) (inl i) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)
@[simp]
theorem length_listTransvecCol : (listTransvecCol M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecCol]
theorem listTransvecCol_getElem {i : ℕ} (h : i < (listTransvecCol M).length) :
(listTransvecCol M)[i] =
letI i' : Fin r := ⟨i, length_listTransvecCol M ▸ h⟩
transvection (inl i') (inr unit) <| -M (inl i') (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit) := by
simp [listTransvecCol]
@[simp]
theorem length_listTransvecRow : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
theorem listTransvecRow_getElem {i : ℕ} (h : i < (listTransvecRow M).length) :
(listTransvecRow M)[i] =
letI i' : Fin r := ⟨i, length_listTransvecRow M ▸ h⟩
transvection (inr unit) (inl i') <| -M (inr unit) (inl i') / M (inr unit) (inr unit) := by
simp [listTransvecRow, Fin.cast]
/-- Multiplying by some of the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` does not change the last row. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ r) :
(((listTransvecCol M).drop k).prod * M) (inr unit) i = M (inr unit) i := by
induction hk using Nat.decreasingInduction with
| of_succ n hn IH =>
have hn' : n < (listTransvecCol M).length := by simpa [listTransvecCol] using hn
rw [List.drop_eq_getElem_cons hn']
simpa [listTransvecCol, Matrix.mul_assoc]
| self =>
simp only [length_listTransvecCol, le_refl, List.drop_eq_nil_of_le, List.prod_nil,
Matrix.one_mul]
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` does not change the last row. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_row (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) (inr unit) i = M (inr unit) i := by
simpa using listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop M i (zero_le _)
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` kills all the coefficients in the
last column but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_col (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) (i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) (inl i) (inr unit) = 0 := by
suffices H :
∀ k : ℕ,
k ≤ r →
(((listTransvecCol M).drop k).prod * M) (inl i) (inr unit) =
if k ≤ i then 0 else M (inl i) (inr unit) by
simpa only [List.drop, _root_.zero_le, ite_true] using H 0 (zero_le _)
intro k hk
induction hk using Nat.decreasingInduction with
| of_succ n hn IH =>
have hn' : n < (listTransvecCol M).length := by simpa [listTransvecCol] using hn
let n' : Fin r := ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [List.drop_eq_getElem_cons hn']
have A :
(listTransvecCol M)[n] =
transvection (inl n') (inr unit) (-M (inl n') (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)) := by
simp [n', listTransvecCol]
simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc, A, List.prod_cons]
by_cases h : n' = i
· have hni : n = i := by
cases i
simp only [n', Fin.mk_eq_mk] at h
simp [h]
simp only [h, transvection_mul_apply_same, IH, ← hni, add_le_iff_nonpos_right,
listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop _ _ hn]
field_simp [hM]
· have hni : n ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
cases i
simp [n'] at h
simp only [ne_eq, inl.injEq, Ne.symm h, not_false_eq_true, transvection_mul_apply_of_ne]
rw [IH]
rcases le_or_lt (n + 1) i with (hi | hi)
· simp only [hi, n.le_succ.trans hi, if_true]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· simpa only [hni.symm, not_le, or_false] using Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi
· simpa only [not_le] using hi
| self =>
simp only [length_listTransvecCol, le_refl, List.drop_eq_nil_of_le, List.prod_nil,
Matrix.one_mul]
rw [if_neg]
simpa only [not_le] using i.2
/-- Multiplying by some of the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` does not change the last column. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ r) :
(M * ((listTransvecRow M).take k).prod) i (inr unit) = M i (inr unit) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Matrix.mul_one, List.take_zero, List.prod_nil, List.take, Matrix.mul_one]
| succ k IH =>
have hkr : k < r := hk
let k' : Fin r := ⟨k, hkr⟩
have :
(listTransvecRow M)[k]? =
↑(transvection (inr Unit.unit) (inl k')
(-M (inr Unit.unit) (inl k') / M (inr Unit.unit) (inr Unit.unit))) := by
simp only [k', listTransvecRow, List.ofFnNthVal, hkr, dif_pos, List.getElem?_ofFn]
simp only [List.take_succ, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, this, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one,
List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, Option.toList_some]
rw [mul_transvection_apply_of_ne, IH hkr.le]
simp only [Ne, not_false_iff, reduceCtorEq]
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` does not change the last column. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_col (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) :
(M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) i (inr unit) = M i (inr unit) := by
have A : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
rw [← List.take_length (l := listTransvecRow M), A]
simpa using mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take M i le_rfl
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` kills all the coefficients in the
last row but the last one. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_row (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) (i : Fin r) :
(M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) = 0 := by
suffices H :
∀ k : ℕ,
k ≤ r →
(M * ((listTransvecRow M).take k).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) =
if k ≤ i then M (inr unit) (inl i) else 0 by
have A : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
rw [← List.take_length (l := listTransvecRow M), A]
have : ¬r ≤ i := by simp
simpa only [this, ite_eq_right_iff] using H r le_rfl
intro k hk
induction k with
| zero => simp only [if_true, Matrix.mul_one, List.take_zero, zero_le', List.prod_nil]
| succ n IH =>
have hnr : n < r := hk
let n' : Fin r := ⟨n, hnr⟩
have A :
(listTransvecRow M)[n]? =
↑(transvection (inr unit) (inl n')
(-M (inr unit) (inl n') / M (inr unit) (inr unit))) := by
simp only [n', listTransvecRow, List.ofFnNthVal, hnr, dif_pos, List.getElem?_ofFn]
simp only [List.take_succ, A, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one,
List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, Option.toList_some]
by_cases h : n' = i
· have hni : n = i := by
cases i
simp only [n', Fin.mk_eq_mk] at h
simp only [h]
have : ¬n.succ ≤ i := by simp only [← hni, n.lt_succ_self, not_le]
simp only [h, mul_transvection_apply_same, List.take, if_false,
mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take _ _ hnr.le, hni.le, this, if_true, IH hnr.le]
field_simp [hM]
· have hni : n ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
cases i
tauto
simp only [IH hnr.le, Ne, mul_transvection_apply_of_ne, Ne.symm h, inl.injEq,
not_false_eq_true]
rcases le_or_lt (n + 1) i with (hi | hi)
· simp [hi, n.le_succ.trans hi, if_true]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· simpa only [not_le] using hi
· simpa only [hni.symm, not_le, or_false] using Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` kills
all the coefficients in the last row but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_col (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0)
(i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) = 0 := by
have : listTransvecRow M = listTransvecRow ((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) := by
simp [listTransvecRow, listTransvecCol_mul_last_row]
rw [this]
apply mul_listTransvecRow_last_row
simpa [listTransvecCol_mul_last_row] using hM
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` kills
all the coefficients in the last column but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_row (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0)
(i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inl i) (inr unit) = 0 := by
have : listTransvecCol M = listTransvecCol (M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) := by
simp [listTransvecCol, mul_listTransvecRow_last_col]
rw [this, Matrix.mul_assoc]
apply listTransvecCol_mul_last_col
simpa [mul_listTransvecRow_last_col] using hM
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` turns
the matrix in block-diagonal form. -/
theorem isTwoBlockDiagonal_listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow
(hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) :
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) := by
constructor
· ext i j
have : j = unit := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
simp [toBlocks₁₂, this, listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_row M hM]
· ext i j
have : i = unit := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
simp [toBlocks₂₁, this, listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_col M hM]
/-- There exist two lists of `TransvectionStruct` such that multiplying by them on the left and
on the right makes a matrix block-diagonal, when the last coefficient is nonzero. -/
theorem exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) :
∃ L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜),
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod) := by
let L : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
⟨inl i, inr unit, by simp, -M (inl i) (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)⟩
let L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
⟨inr unit, inl i, by simp, -M (inr unit) (inl i) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)⟩
refine ⟨L, L', ?_⟩
have A : L.map toMatrix = listTransvecCol M := by simp [L, listTransvecCol, Function.comp_def]
have B : L'.map toMatrix = listTransvecRow M := by simp [L', listTransvecRow, Function.comp_def]
rw [A, B]
exact isTwoBlockDiagonal_listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow M hM
/-- There exist two lists of `TransvectionStruct` such that multiplying by them on the left and
on the right makes a matrix block-diagonal. -/
theorem exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec
(M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :
∃ L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜),
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod) := by
by_cases H : IsTwoBlockDiagonal M
· refine ⟨List.nil, List.nil, by simpa using H⟩
-- we have already proved this when the last coefficient is nonzero
by_cases hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0
· exact exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M hM
-- when the last coefficient is zero but there is a nonzero coefficient on the last row or the
-- last column, we will first put this nonzero coefficient in last position, and then argue as
-- above.
push_neg at hM
simp only [not_and_or, IsTwoBlockDiagonal, toBlocks₁₂, toBlocks₂₁, ← Matrix.ext_iff] at H
have : ∃ i : Fin r, M (inl i) (inr unit) ≠ 0 ∨ M (inr unit) (inl i) ≠ 0 := by
rcases H with H | H
· contrapose! H
rintro i ⟨⟩
exact (H i).1
· contrapose! H
rintro ⟨⟩ j
exact (H j).2
rcases this with ⟨i, h | h⟩
· let M' := transvection (inr Unit.unit) (inl i) 1 * M
have hM' : M' (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0 := by simpa [M', hM]
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M' hM' with ⟨L, L', hLL'⟩
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc] at hLL'
refine ⟨L ++ [⟨inr unit, inl i, by simp, 1⟩], L', ?_⟩
simp only [List.map_append, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one, toMatrix_mk, List.prod_cons,
List.prod_nil, List.map, Matrix.mul_assoc (L.map toMatrix).prod]
exact hLL'
· let M' := M * transvection (inl i) (inr unit) 1
have hM' : M' (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0 := by simpa [M', hM]
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M' hM' with ⟨L, L', hLL'⟩
refine ⟨L, ⟨inl i, inr unit, by simp, 1⟩::L', ?_⟩
simp only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, toMatrix_mk, List.prod_cons, List.map]
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc (L.map toMatrix).prod]
exact hLL'
/-- Inductive step for the reduction: if one knows that any size `r` matrix can be reduced to
diagonal form by elementary operations, then one deduces it for matrices over `Fin r ⊕ Unit`. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_induction
(IH :
∀ M : Matrix (Fin r) (Fin r) 𝕜,
∃ (L₀ L₀' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r) 𝕜)) (D₀ : Fin r → 𝕜),
(L₀.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L₀'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D₀)
(M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜)) (D : Fin r ⊕ Unit → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec M with ⟨L₁, L₁', hM⟩
let M' := (L₁.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L₁'.map toMatrix).prod
let M'' := toBlocks₁₁ M'
rcases IH M'' with ⟨L₀, L₀', D₀, h₀⟩
set c := M' (inr unit) (inr unit)
refine
⟨L₀.map (sumInl Unit) ++ L₁, L₁' ++ L₀'.map (sumInl Unit),
Sum.elim D₀ fun _ => M' (inr unit) (inr unit), ?_⟩
suffices (L₀.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl Unit)).prod * M' * (L₀'.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl Unit)).prod =
diagonal (Sum.elim D₀ fun _ => c) by
simpa [M', c, Matrix.mul_assoc]
have : M' = fromBlocks M'' 0 0 (diagonal fun _ => c) := by
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks M', hM.1, hM.2]
rfl
rw [this]
simp [h₀]
variable {n p} [Fintype n] [Fintype p]
/-- Reduction to diagonal form by elementary operations is invariant under reindexing. -/
theorem reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal (M : Matrix p p 𝕜)
(e : p ≃ n)
(H :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * Matrix.reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod =
diagonal D) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct p 𝕜)) (D : p → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
rcases H with ⟨L₀, L₀', D₀, h₀⟩
refine ⟨L₀.map (reindexEquiv e.symm), L₀'.map (reindexEquiv e.symm), D₀ ∘ e, ?_⟩
have : M = reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e.symm (reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e M) := by
simp only [Equiv.symm_symm, submatrix_submatrix, reindex_apply, submatrix_id_id,
Equiv.symm_comp_self, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
rw [this]
simp only [toMatrix_reindexEquiv_prod, List.map_map, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
simp only [← reindexAlgEquiv_apply 𝕜, ← reindexAlgEquiv_mul, h₀]
simp only [Equiv.symm_symm, reindex_apply, submatrix_diagonal_equiv, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
/-- Any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by elementary operations. Formulated here on `Type 0`
because we will make an induction using `Fin r`.
See `exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal` for the general version (which follows
from this one and reindexing). -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_aux (n : Type) [Fintype n]
[DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
suffices ∀ cn, Fintype.card n = cn →
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D by exact this _ rfl
intro cn hn
induction cn generalizing n M with
| zero =>
refine ⟨List.nil, List.nil, fun _ => 1, ?_⟩
ext i j
rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hn
exact hn.elim' i
| succ r IH =>
have e : n ≃ Fin r ⊕ Unit := by
refine Fintype.equivOfCardEq ?_
rw [hn]
rw [@Fintype.card_sum (Fin r) Unit _ _]
simp
apply reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M e
apply
exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_induction fun N =>
IH (Fin r) N (by simp)
/-- Any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by elementary operations. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
have e : n ≃ Fin (Fintype.card n) := Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp)
apply reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M e
apply exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_aux
/-- Any matrix can be written as the product of transvections, a diagonal matrix, and
transvections. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
M = (L.map toMatrix).prod * diagonal D * (L'.map toMatrix).prod := by
rcases exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M with ⟨L, L', D, h⟩
refine ⟨L.reverse.map TransvectionStruct.inv, L'.reverse.map TransvectionStruct.inv, D, ?_⟩
suffices
M =
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (L.map toMatrix).prod * M *
((L'.map toMatrix).prod * (L'.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod)
by simpa [← h, Matrix.mul_assoc]
rw [reverse_inv_prod_mul_prod, prod_mul_reverse_inv_prod, Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one]
end Pivot
open Pivot TransvectionStruct
variable {n} [Fintype n]
/-- Induction principle for matrices based on transvections: if a property is true for all diagonal
matrices, all transvections, and is stable under product, then it is true for all matrices. This is
the useful way to say that matrices are generated by diagonal matrices and transvections.
We state a slightly more general version: to prove a property for a matrix `M`, it suffices to
assume that the diagonal matrices we consider have the same determinant as `M`. This is useful to
obtain similar principles for `SLₙ` or `GLₙ`. -/
theorem diagonal_transvection_induction (P : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop) (M : Matrix n n 𝕜)
(hdiag : ∀ D : n → 𝕜, det (diagonal D) = det M → P (diagonal D))
(htransvec : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n 𝕜, P t.toMatrix) (hmul : ∀ A B, P A → P B → P (A * B)) :
P M := by
rcases exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec M with ⟨L, L', D, h⟩
have PD : P (diagonal D) := hdiag D (by simp [h])
suffices H :
∀ (L₁ L₂ : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (E : Matrix n n 𝕜),
P E → P ((L₁.map toMatrix).prod * E * (L₂.map toMatrix).prod) by
rw [h]
apply H L L'
exact PD
intro L₁ L₂ E PE
induction L₁ with
| nil =>
simp only [Matrix.one_mul, List.prod_nil, List.map]
induction L₂ generalizing E with
| nil => simpa
| cons t L₂ IH =>
simp only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_cons, List.map]
apply IH
exact hmul _ _ PE (htransvec _)
| cons t L₁ IH =>
simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_cons, List.map] at IH ⊢
exact hmul _ _ (htransvec _) IH
/-- Induction principle for invertible matrices based on transvections: if a property is true for
all invertible diagonal matrices, all transvections, and is stable under product of invertible
matrices, then it is true for all invertible matrices. This is the useful way to say that
invertible matrices are generated by invertible diagonal matrices and transvections. -/
theorem diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero (P : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop) (M : Matrix n n 𝕜)
(hMdet : det M ≠ 0) (hdiag : ∀ D : n → 𝕜, det (diagonal D) ≠ 0 → P (diagonal D))
(htransvec : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n 𝕜, P t.toMatrix)
(hmul : ∀ A B, det A ≠ 0 → det B ≠ 0 → P A → P B → P (A * B)) : P M := by
let Q : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop := fun N => det N ≠ 0 ∧ P N
have : Q M := by
apply diagonal_transvection_induction Q M
· intro D hD
have detD : det (diagonal D) ≠ 0 := by
rw [hD]
exact hMdet
exact ⟨detD, hdiag _ detD⟩
· intro t
exact ⟨by simp, htransvec t⟩
· intro A B QA QB
exact ⟨by simp [QA.1, QB.1], hmul A B QA.1 QB.1 QA.2 QB.2⟩
exact this.2
end Matrix
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Transvection.lean | 747 | 763 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
/-!
# Exponent of a group
This file defines the exponent of a group, or more generally a monoid. For a group `G` it is defined
to be the minimal `n≥1` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`. For a finite group `G`,
it is equal to the lowest common multiple of the order of all elements of the group `G`.
## Main definitions
* `Monoid.ExponentExists` is a predicate on a monoid `G` saying that there is some positive `n`
such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`.
* `Monoid.exponent` defines the exponent of a monoid `G` as the minimal positive `n` such that
`g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`, by convention it is `0` if no such `n` exists.
* `AddMonoid.ExponentExists` the additive version of `Monoid.ExponentExists`.
* `AddMonoid.exponent` the additive version of `Monoid.exponent`.
## Main results
* `Monoid.lcm_order_eq_exponent`: For a finite left cancel monoid `G`, the exponent is equal to the
`Finset.lcm` of the order of its elements.
* `Monoid.exponent_eq_iSup_orderOf(')`: For a commutative cancel monoid, the exponent is
equal to `⨆ g : G, orderOf g` (or zero if it has any order-zero elements).
* `Monoid.exponent_pi` and `Monoid.exponent_prod`: The exponent of a finite product of monoids is
the least common multiple (`Finset.lcm` and `lcm`, respectively) of the exponents of the
constituent monoids.
* `MonoidHom.exponent_dvd`: If `f : M₁ →⋆ M₂` is surjective, then the exponent of `M₂` divides the
exponent of `M₁`.
## TODO
* Refactor the characteristic of a ring to be the exponent of its underlying additive group.
-/
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
/-- A predicate on a monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1`
for all `g`. -/
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
open scoped Classical in
/-- The exponent of a group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all
`g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
/-- The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that `g ^ n ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G) : g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc
g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = g ^ (n % exponent G) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos_of_exists (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
0 < exponent G :=
ExponentExists.exponent_pos ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min' (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) : exponent G ≤ n := by
classical
rw [exponent, dif_pos]
· apply Nat.find_min'
exact ⟨hpos, hG⟩
· exact ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min (m : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < m) (hm : m < exponent G) : ∃ g : G, g ^ m ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h
have hcon : exponent G ≤ m := exponent_min' m hpos h
omega
@[to_additive AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_iff]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exponent G = 1 ↔ Subsingleton G := by
refine ⟨fun eq_one => ⟨fun a b => ?a_eq_b⟩, fun h => le_antisymm ?le ?ge⟩
· rw [← pow_one a, ← pow_one b, ← eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one]
· apply exponent_min' _ Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt
apply exponent_pos_of_exists 1 Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton]
theorem exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton [hs : Subsingleton G] : exponent G = 1 :=
exp_eq_one_iff.mpr hs
@[to_additive addOrder_dvd_exponent]
theorem order_dvd_exponent (g : G) : orderOf g ∣ exponent G :=
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one <| pow_exponent_eq_one g
| @[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_exponent (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : orderOf g ≤ exponent G :=
Nat.le_of_dvd h.exponent_pos (order_dvd_exponent g)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 183 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
/-!
# Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces.
Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
open Filter Function Set Uniformity Topology
section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β}
/-!
### Uniform inducing maps
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is called *uniform inducing* if the uniformity filter
on `α` is the pullback of the uniformity filter on `β` under `Prod.map f f`. If `α` is a separated
space, then this implies that `f` is injective, hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformInducing (f : α → β) : Prop where
/-- The uniformity filter on the domain is the pullback of the uniformity filter on the codomain
under `Prod.map f f`. -/
comap_uniformity : comap (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α
lemma isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f = ‹UniformSpace α› := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformSpace.ext_iff, Filter.ext_iff]
rfl
protected alias ⟨IsUniformInducing.comap_uniformSpace, _⟩ := isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace
lemma isUniformInducing_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformContinuous, tendsto_iff_comap, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]; rfl
protected lemma Filter.HasBasis.isUniformInducing_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
| simp [isUniformInducing_iff', h.uniformContinuous_iff h', (h'.comap _).le_basis_iff h, subset_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.mk' {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, Filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformEmbedding.lean | 54 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 171 | 171 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.Basic
/-!
# M-types
M types are potentially infinite tree-like structures. They are defined
as the greatest fixpoint of a polynomial functor.
-/
universe u v w
open Nat Function
open List
variable (F : PFunctor.{u})
namespace PFunctor
namespace Approx
/-- `CofixA F n` is an `n` level approximation of an M-type -/
inductive CofixA : ℕ → Type u
| continue : CofixA 0
| intro {n} : ∀ a, (F.B a → CofixA n) → CofixA (succ n)
/-- default inhabitant of `CofixA` -/
protected def CofixA.default [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro default fun _ => CofixA.default n
instance [Inhabited F.A] {n} : Inhabited (CofixA F n) :=
⟨CofixA.default F n⟩
theorem cofixA_eq_zero : ∀ x y : CofixA F 0, x = y
| CofixA.continue, CofixA.continue => rfl
variable {F}
/-- The label of the root of the tree for a non-trivial
approximation of the cofix of a pfunctor.
-/
def head' : ∀ {n}, CofixA F (succ n) → F.A
| _, CofixA.intro i _ => i
/-- for a non-trivial approximation, return all the subtrees of the root -/
def children' : ∀ {n} (x : CofixA F (succ n)), F.B (head' x) → CofixA F n
| _, CofixA.intro _ f => f
theorem approx_eta {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (n + 1)) : x = CofixA.intro (head' x) (children' x) := by
cases x; rfl
/-- Relation between two approximations of the cofix of a pfunctor
that state they both contain the same data until one of them is truncated -/
inductive Agree : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F n → CofixA F (n + 1) → Prop
| continu (x : CofixA F 0) (y : CofixA F 1) : Agree x y
| intro {n} {a} (x : F.B a → CofixA F n) (x' : F.B a → CofixA F (n + 1)) :
(∀ i : F.B a, Agree (x i) (x' i)) → Agree (CofixA.intro a x) (CofixA.intro a x')
/-- Given an infinite series of approximations `approx`,
`AllAgree approx` states that they are all consistent with each other.
-/
def AllAgree (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) :=
∀ n, Agree (x n) (x (succ n))
@[simp]
theorem agree_trivial {x : CofixA F 0} {y : CofixA F 1} : Agree x y := by constructor
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias agree_trival := agree_trivial
theorem agree_children {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (succ n)) (y : CofixA F (succ n + 1)) {i j}
(h₀ : HEq i j) (h₁ : Agree x y) : Agree (children' x i) (children' y j) := by
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := h₁; cases h₀
apply hagree
/-- `truncate a` turns `a` into a more limited approximation -/
def truncate : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F (n + 1) → CofixA F n
| 0, CofixA.intro _ _ => CofixA.continue
| succ _, CofixA.intro i f => CofixA.intro i <| truncate ∘ f
theorem truncate_eq_of_agree {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F n) (y : CofixA F (succ n)) (h : Agree x y) :
truncate y = x := by
induction n <;> cases x <;> cases y
· rfl
· -- cases' h with _ _ _ _ _ h₀ h₁
cases h
simp only [truncate, Function.comp_def, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be `ext y`
rename_i n_ih a f y h₁
suffices (fun x => truncate (y x)) = f
by simp [this]
funext y
apply n_ih
apply h₁
variable {X : Type w}
variable (f : X → F X)
/-- `sCorec f i n` creates an approximation of height `n`
of the final coalgebra of `f` -/
def sCorec : X → ∀ n, CofixA F n
| _, 0 => CofixA.continue
| j, succ _ => CofixA.intro (f j).1 fun i => sCorec ((f j).2 i) _
theorem P_corec (i : X) (n : ℕ) : Agree (sCorec f i n) (sCorec f i (succ n)) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing i
constructor
obtain ⟨y, g⟩ := f i
constructor
introv
apply n_ih
/-- `Path F` provides indices to access internal nodes in `Corec F` -/
def Path (F : PFunctor.{u}) :=
List F.Idx
instance Path.inhabited : Inhabited (Path F) :=
⟨[]⟩
open List Nat
instance CofixA.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (CofixA F 0) :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl⟩
theorem head_succ' (n m : ℕ) (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) (Hconsistent : AllAgree x) :
head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x (succ m)) := by
suffices ∀ n, head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x 1) by simp [this]
clear m n
intro n
rcases h₀ : x (succ n) with - | ⟨_, f₀⟩
cases h₁ : x 1
dsimp only [head']
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [h₁] at h₀
cases h₀
trivial
· have H := Hconsistent (succ n)
cases h₂ : x (succ n)
rw [h₀, h₂] at H
apply n_ih (truncate ∘ f₀)
rw [h₂]
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := H
congr
funext j
dsimp only [comp_apply]
rw [truncate_eq_of_agree]
apply hagree
end Approx
open Approx
/-- Internal definition for `M`. It is needed to avoid name clashes
between `M.mk` and `M.casesOn` and the declarations generated for
the structure -/
structure MIntl where
/-- An `n`-th level approximation, for each depth `n` -/
approx : ∀ n, CofixA F n
/-- Each approximation agrees with the next -/
consistent : AllAgree approx
/-- For polynomial functor `F`, `M F` is its final coalgebra -/
def M :=
MIntl F
theorem M.default_consistent [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, Agree (default : CofixA F n) default
| 0 => Agree.continu _ _
| succ n => Agree.intro _ _ fun _ => M.default_consistent n
instance M.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (M F) :=
⟨{ approx := default
consistent := M.default_consistent _ }⟩
instance MIntl.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (MIntl F) :=
show Inhabited (M F) by infer_instance
namespace M
theorem ext' (x y : M F) (H : ∀ i : ℕ, x.approx i = y.approx i) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
congr with n
apply H
variable {X : Type*}
variable (f : X → F X)
variable {F}
/-- Corecursor for the M-type defined by `F`. -/
protected def corec (i : X) : M F where
approx := sCorec f i
consistent := P_corec _ _
/-- given a tree generated by `F`, `head` gives us the first piece of data
it contains -/
def head (x : M F) :=
head' (x.1 1)
/-- return all the subtrees of the root of a tree `x : M F` -/
def children (x : M F) (i : F.B (head x)) : M F :=
let H := fun n : ℕ => @head_succ' _ n 0 x.1 x.2
{ approx := fun n => children' (x.1 _) (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H]) i)
consistent := by
intro n
have P' := x.2 (succ n)
apply agree_children _ _ _ P'
trans i
· apply cast_heq
symm
apply cast_heq }
/-- select a subtree using an `i : F.Idx` or return an arbitrary tree if
`i` designates no subtree of `x` -/
def ichildren [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] (i : F.Idx) (x : M F) : M F :=
if H' : i.1 = head x then children x (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H']) i.2)
else default
theorem head_succ (n m : ℕ) (x : M F) : head' (x.approx (succ n)) = head' (x.approx (succ m)) :=
head_succ' n m _ x.consistent
theorem head_eq_head' : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head x = head' (x.approx <| n + 1)
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
theorem head'_eq_head : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head' (x.approx <| n + 1) = head x
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
theorem truncate_approx (x : M F) (n : ℕ) : truncate (x.approx <| n + 1) = x.approx n :=
truncate_eq_of_agree _ _ (x.consistent _)
/-- unfold an M-type -/
def dest : M F → F (M F)
| x => ⟨head x, fun i => children x i⟩
namespace Approx
/-- generates the approximations needed for `M.mk` -/
protected def sMk (x : F (M F)) : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro x.1 fun i => (x.2 i).approx n
protected theorem P_mk (x : F (M F)) : AllAgree (Approx.sMk x)
| 0 => by constructor
| succ n => by
constructor
introv
apply (x.2 i).consistent
end Approx
/-- constructor for M-types -/
protected def mk (x : F (M F)) : M F where
approx := Approx.sMk x
consistent := Approx.P_mk x
/-- `Agree' n` relates two trees of type `M F` that
are the same up to depth `n` -/
inductive Agree' : ℕ → M F → M F → Prop
| trivial (x y : M F) : Agree' 0 x y
| step {n : ℕ} {a} (x y : F.B a → M F) {x' y'} :
x' = M.mk ⟨a, x⟩ → y' = M.mk ⟨a, y⟩ → (∀ i, Agree' n (x i) (y i)) → Agree' (succ n) x' y'
@[simp]
theorem dest_mk (x : F (M F)) : dest (M.mk x) = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_dest (x : M F) : M.mk (dest x) = x := by
apply ext'
intro n
dsimp only [M.mk]
induction' n with n
· apply @Subsingleton.elim _ CofixA.instSubsingleton
dsimp only [Approx.sMk, dest, head]
rcases h : x.approx (succ n) with - | ⟨hd, ch⟩
have h' : hd = head' (x.approx 1) := by
rw [← head_succ' n, h, head']
apply x.consistent
revert ch
rw [h']
intros ch h
congr
ext a
dsimp only [children]
generalize hh : cast _ a = a''
rw [cast_eq_iff_heq] at hh
revert a''
rw [h]
intros _ hh
cases hh
rfl
theorem mk_inj {x y : F (M F)} (h : M.mk x = M.mk y) : x = y := by rw [← dest_mk x, h, dest_mk]
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def cases {r : M F → Sort w} (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) (x : M F) : r x :=
suffices r (M.mk (dest x)) by
rw [← mk_dest x]
exact this
f _
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def casesOn {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) : r x :=
M.cases f x
/-- destructor for M-types, similar to `casesOn` but also
gives access directly to the root and subtrees on an M-type -/
protected def casesOn' {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ a f, r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) : r x :=
M.casesOn x (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
theorem approx_mk (a : F.A) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : ℕ) :
(M.mk ⟨a, f⟩).approx (succ i) = CofixA.intro a fun j => (f j).approx i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem agree'_refl {n : ℕ} (x : M F) : Agree' n x x := by
induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x <;>
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' <;> constructor <;> try rfl
intros
apply n_ih
theorem agree_iff_agree' {n : ℕ} (x y : M F) :
Agree (x.approx n) (y.approx <| n + 1) ↔ Agree' n x y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [approx_mk] at h
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := h
constructor <;> try rfl
intro i
apply n_ih
apply hagree
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· obtain - | @⟨_, a, x', y'⟩ := h
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
induction' y using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with y_a y_f
simp only [approx_mk]
have h_a_1 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨x_a, x_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, x'⟩›
cases h_a_1
replace h_a_2 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨y_a, y_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, y'⟩›
cases h_a_2
constructor
intro i
apply n_ih
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem cases_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.cases f (M.mk x) = f x := by
dsimp only [M.mk, PFunctor.M.cases, dest, head, Approx.sMk, head']
cases x; dsimp only [Approx.sMk]
simp only [Eq.mpr]
apply congrFun
rfl
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn (M.mk x) f = f x :=
cases_mk x f
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk' {r : M F → Sort*} {a} (x : F.B a → M F)
(f : ∀ (a) (f : F.B a → M F), r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) f = f a x :=
@cases_mk F r ⟨a, x⟩ (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
/-- `IsPath p x` tells us if `p` is a valid path through `x` -/
inductive IsPath : Path F → M F → Prop
| nil (x : M F) : IsPath [] x
| cons (xs : Path F) {a} (x : M F) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B a) :
x = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ → IsPath xs (f i) → IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) x
theorem isPath_cons {xs : Path F} {a a'} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a'} :
IsPath (⟨a', i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → a = a' := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, _⟩)
cases mk_inj h
rfl
theorem isPath_cons' {xs : Path F} {a} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a} :
IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → IsPath xs (f i) := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, hp⟩)
cases mk_inj h
exact hp
/-- follow a path through a value of `M F` and return the subtree
found at the end of the path if it is a valid path for that value and
return a default tree -/
def isubtree [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] : Path F → M F → M F
| [], x => x
| ⟨a, i⟩ :: ps, x =>
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (r := fun _ => M F) x (fun a' f =>
if h : a = a' then
isubtree ps (f <| cast (by rw [h]) i)
else
default (α := M F)
)
/-- similar to `isubtree` but returns the data at the end of the path instead
of the whole subtree -/
def iselect [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) : M F → F.A := fun x : M F =>
head <| isubtree ps x
theorem iselect_eq_default [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) (x : M F)
(h : ¬IsPath ps x) : iselect ps x = head default := by
induction' ps with ps_hd ps_tail ps_ih generalizing x
· exfalso
apply h
constructor
· obtain ⟨a, i⟩ := ps_hd
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
simp only [iselect, isubtree] at ps_ih ⊢
by_cases h'' : a = x_a
· subst x_a
simp only [dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, casesOn_mk']
rw [ps_ih]
intro h'
apply h
constructor <;> try rfl
apply h'
· simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem head_mk (x : F (M F)) : head (M.mk x) = x.1 :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x.1 = (dest (M.mk x)).1 := by rw [dest_mk]
_ = head (M.mk x) := rfl
theorem children_mk {a} (x : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B (head (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩))) :
children (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) i = x (cast (by rw [head_mk]) i) := by apply ext'; intro n; rfl
@[simp]
theorem ichildren_mk [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (x : F (M F)) (i : F.Idx) :
ichildren i (M.mk x) = x.iget i := by
dsimp only [ichildren, PFunctor.Obj.iget]
congr with h
@[simp]
theorem isubtree_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F)
{i : F.B a} : isubtree (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = isubtree ps (f i) := by
simp only [isubtree, ichildren_mk, PFunctor.Obj.iget, dif_pos, isubtree, M.casesOn_mk']; rfl
@[simp]
theorem iselect_nil [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] {a} (f : F.B a → M F) :
iselect nil (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem iselect_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F) {i} :
iselect (⟨a, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = iselect ps (f i) := by simp only [iselect, isubtree_cons]
theorem corec_def {X} (f : X → F X) (x₀ : X) : M.corec f x₀ = M.mk (F.map (M.corec f) (f x₀)) := by
dsimp only [M.corec, M.mk]
congr with n
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
cases f x₀
dsimp only [PFunctor.map]
congr
theorem ext_aux [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] {n : ℕ} (x y z : M F) (hx : Agree' n z x)
(hy : Agree' n z y) (hrec : ∀ ps : Path F, n = ps.length → iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x.approx (n + 1) = y.approx (n + 1) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing x y z
· specialize hrec [] rfl
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [iselect_nil] at hrec
subst hrec
simp only [approx_mk, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, zero_eq, CofixA.intro.injEq,
heq_eq_eq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, and_self]
· cases hx
cases hy
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
subst z
iterate 3 (have := mk_inj ‹_›; cases this)
rename_i n_ih a f₃ f₂ hAgree₂ _ _ h₂ _ _ f₁ h₁ hAgree₁ clr
simp only [approx_mk, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
have := mk_inj h₁
cases this; clear h₁
have := mk_inj h₂
cases this; clear h₂
congr
ext i
apply n_ih
· solve_by_elim
· solve_by_elim
introv h
specialize hrec (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (congr_arg _ h)
simp only [iselect_cons] at hrec
exact hrec
open PFunctor.Approx
theorem ext [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] (x y : M F)
(H : ∀ ps : Path F, iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x = y := by
apply ext'; intro i
induction' i with i i_ih
· cases x.approx 0
cases y.approx 0
constructor
· apply ext_aux x y x
· rw [← agree_iff_agree']
apply x.consistent
· rw [← agree_iff_agree', i_ih]
apply y.consistent
introv H'
dsimp only [iselect] at H
cases H'
apply H ps
section Bisim
variable (R : M F → M F → Prop)
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimulation is the standard proof technique for equality between
infinite tree-like structures -/
structure IsBisimulation : Prop where
/-- The head of the trees are equal -/
head : ∀ {a a'} {f f'}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a', f'⟩ → a = a'
/-- The tails are equal -/
tail : ∀ {a} {f f' : F.B a → M F}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ → ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i
theorem nth_of_bisim [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A]
(bisim : IsBisimulation R) (s₁ s₂) (ps : Path F) :
(R s₁ s₂) →
IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂ →
iselect ps s₁ = iselect ps s₂ ∧
∃ (a : _) (f f' : F.B a → M F),
isubtree ps s₁ = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ∧
isubtree ps s₂ = M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ ∧ ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i := by
intro h₀ hh
induction' s₁ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a f
induction' s₂ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a' f'
obtain rfl : a = a' := bisim.head h₀
induction' ps with i ps ps_ih generalizing a f f'
· exists rfl, a, f, f', rfl, rfl
apply bisim.tail h₀
obtain ⟨a', i⟩ := i
obtain rfl : a = a' := by rcases hh with hh|hh <;> cases isPath_cons hh <;> rfl
dsimp only [iselect] at ps_ih ⊢
have h₁ := bisim.tail h₀ i
induction' h : f i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₀ f₀
induction' h' : f' i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₁ f₁
simp only [h, h', isubtree_cons] at ps_ih ⊢
rw [h, h'] at h₁
obtain rfl : a₀ = a₁ := bisim.head h₁
apply ps_ih _ _ _ h₁
rw [← h, ← h']
apply Or.imp isPath_cons' isPath_cons' hh
theorem eq_of_bisim [Nonempty (M F)] (bisim : IsBisimulation R) : ∀ s₁ s₂, R s₁ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := by
inhabit M F
classical
introv Hr; apply ext
introv
| by_cases h : IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂
· have H := nth_of_bisim R bisim _ _ ps Hr h
exact H.left
· rw [not_or] at h
obtain ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ := h
simp only [iselect_eq_default, *, not_false_iff]
end Bisim
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/M.lean | 573 | 581 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,461 | 1,461 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.SnakeLemma
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ShortExact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplexLimits
/-!
# The homology sequence
If `0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` is a short exact sequence in a category of complexes
`HomologicalComplex C c` in an abelian category (i.e. `S` is a short complex in
that category and satisfies `hS : S.ShortExact`), then whenever `i` and `j` are degrees
such that `hij : c.Rel i j`, then there is a long exact sequence :
`... ⟶ S.X₁.homology i ⟶ S.X₂.homology i ⟶ S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j ⟶ ...`.
The connecting homomorphism `S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j` is `hS.δ i j hij`, and
the exactness is asserted as lemmas `hS.homology_exact₁`, `hS.homology_exact₂` and
`hS.homology_exact₃`.
The proof is based on the snake lemma, similarly as it was originally done in
the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
## References
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0111
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
(K L : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (i j : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology j]
/-- The morphism `K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j` that is induced by `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesToCycles [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
K.liftCycles (K.fromOpcycles i j) _ rfl (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_iCycles : K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.fromOpcycles i j := by
dsimp only [opcyclesToCycles]
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.d i j := by
simp [opcyclesToCycles]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j = K.toCycles i j := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), assoc, opcyclesToCycles_iCycles,
p_fromOpcycles, toCycles_i]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_opcyclesToCycles :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), assoc, opcyclesToCycles_iCycles,
homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_homologyπ :
K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.homologyπ j = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i),
pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_assoc, toCycles_comp_homologyπ, comp_zero]
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_naturality :
opcyclesMap φ i ≫ opcyclesToCycles L i j = opcyclesToCycles K i j ≫ cyclesMap φ j := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (L.iCycles j), ← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i),
assoc, p_opcyclesMap_assoc, pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles, Hom.comm, cyclesMap_i,
pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles_assoc]
variable (C c)
/-- The natural transformation `K.opcyclesToCycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j` for all
`K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransOpCyclesToCycles [CategoryWithHomology C] :
opcyclesFunctor C c i ⟶ cyclesFunctor C c j where
app K := K.opcyclesToCycles i j
end HasZeroMorphisms
section Preadditive
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
(K : HomologicalComplex C c) (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j)
namespace HomologySequence
/-- The diagram `K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def composableArrows₃ [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
ComposableArrows C 3 :=
ComposableArrows.mk₃ (K.homologyι i) (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j)
instance [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
Mono ((composableArrows₃ K i j).map' 0 1) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11
We turn off simprocs here.
Ideally someone will investigate whether `simp` lemmas can be rearranged
so that this works without the `set_option`,
*or* come up with a proposal regarding finer control of disabling simprocs. -/
set_option simprocs false in
instance [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
Epi ((composableArrows₃ K i j).map' 2 3) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
include hij in
/-- The diagram `K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j` is exact
when `c.Rel i j`. -/
lemma composableArrows₃_exact [CategoryWithHomology C] :
(composableArrows₃ K i j).Exact := by
let S := ShortComplex.mk (K.homologyι i) (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (by simp)
let S' := ShortComplex.mk (K.homologyι i) (K.fromOpcycles i j) (by simp)
let ι : S ⟶ S' :=
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := K.iCycles j }
have hS : S.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono ι]
exact S'.exact_of_f_is_kernel (K.homologyIsKernel i j (c.next_eq' hij))
let T := ShortComplex.mk (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j) (by simp)
let T' := ShortComplex.mk (K.toCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j) (by simp)
let π : T' ⟶ T :=
{ τ₁ := K.pOpcycles i
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
have hT : T.Exact := by
rw [← ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono π]
exact T'.exact_of_g_is_cokernel (K.homologyIsCokernel i j (c.prev_eq' hij))
apply ComposableArrows.exact_of_δ₀
· exact hS.exact_toComposableArrows
· exact hT.exact_toComposableArrows
variable (C)
attribute [local simp] homologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11
We turn off simprocs here.
Ideally someone will investigate whether `simp` lemmas can be rearranged
so that this works without the `set_option`,
*or* come up with a proposal regarding finer control of disabling simprocs. -/
set_option simprocs false in
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ComposableArrows C 3` that maps `K` to the
diagram `K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def composableArrows₃Functor [CategoryWithHomology C] :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ComposableArrows C 3 where
obj K := composableArrows₃ K i j
map {K L} φ := ComposableArrows.homMk₃ (homologyMap φ i) (opcyclesMap φ i) (cyclesMap φ j)
(homologyMap φ j) (by simp) (by simp) (by simp)
end HomologySequence
end Preadditive
section Abelian
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [Abelian C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
|
/-- If `X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` is an exact sequence of homological complexes, then
`X₁.opcycles i ⟶ X₂.opcycles i ⟶ X₃.opcycles i ⟶ 0` is exact. This lemma states
the exactness at `X₂.opcycles i`, while the fact that `X₂.opcycles i ⟶ X₃.opcycles i`
is an epi is an instance. -/
lemma opcycles_right_exact (S : ShortComplex (HomologicalComplex C c)) (hS : S.Exact) [Epi S.g]
(i : ι) [S.X₁.HasHomology i] [S.X₂.HasHomology i] [S.X₃.HasHomology i] :
(ShortComplex.mk (opcyclesMap S.f i) (opcyclesMap S.g i)
(by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, S.zero, opcyclesMap_zero])).Exact := by
have : Epi (ShortComplex.map S (eval C c i)).g := by dsimp; infer_instance
have hj := (hS.map (HomologicalComplex.eval C c i)).gIsCokernel
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_g_is_cokernel
refine CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ' _ _ (fun {A} k hk => by
dsimp at k hk ⊢
have H := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hj (S.X₂.pOpcycles i ≫ k) (by
dsimp
rw [← p_opcyclesMap_assoc, hk, comp_zero])
dsimp at H
refine ⟨S.X₃.descOpcycles H.1 _ rfl ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← cancel_epi (S.g.f (c.prev i)), comp_zero, Hom.comm_assoc, H.2,
d_pOpcycles_assoc, zero_comp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologySequence.lean | 177 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_left (hca : z ≤ x) : (x \ y) \ (x \ z) = z \ y :=
sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff.antisymm <|
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hca
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_right (hcb : z ≤ y) : (x \ z) \ (y \ z) = x \ y := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, sdiff_le_comm]
exact ⟨sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff,
(disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb⟩
theorem inf_sdiff : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x \ z ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
| x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z = (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 403 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
end Liftp'
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_diag {α} : dropFun (@prod.diag (n + 1) α) = prod.diag := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (subtypeVal p) = subtypeVal _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (subtypeVal p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (toSubtype p) = toSubtype _ := by
ext i
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (toSubtype p) = _root_.id := by
ext i : 2
induction i; simp [dropFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (ofSubtype p) = ofSubtype _ := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (ofSubtype p) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_RelLast' {α : TypeVec n} {β} (R : β → β → Prop) :
dropFun (RelLast' α R) = repeatEq α :=
rfl
attribute [simp] drop_append1'
open MvFunctor
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
dropFun (f ⊗' f') = (dropFun f ⊗' dropFun f') := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
lastFun (f ⊗' f') = Prod.map (lastFun f) (lastFun f') := by
ext i : 1
induction i; simp [lastFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
dropFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
lastFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_id {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : dropFun (@TypeVec.id _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_id {α β : TypeVec n} : (@TypeVec.id _ α ⊗' @TypeVec.id _ β) = id := by
ext i x : 2
induction i <;> simp only [TypeVec.prod.map, *, dropFun_id]
cases x
· rfl
· rfl
| @[simp]
theorem subtypeVal_diagSub {α : TypeVec n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp [comp, diagSub, subtypeVal, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih =>
simp only [comp, subtypeVal, diagSub, prod.diag] at *
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 652 | 658 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Actions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Properties of group actions involving quotient groups
This file proves properties of group actions which use the quotient group construction, notably
* the orbit-stabilizer theorem `MulAction.card_orbit_mul_card_stabilizer_eq_card_group`
* the class formula `MulAction.card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer'`
* Burnside's lemma `MulAction.sum_card_fixedBy_eq_card_orbits_mul_card_group`,
as well as their analogues for additive groups.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function
namespace MulAction
variable [Group α]
section QuotientAction
open Subgroup MulOpposite QuotientGroup
variable (β) [Monoid β] [MulAction β α] (H : Subgroup α)
/-- A typeclass for when a `MulAction β α` descends to the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
class QuotientAction : Prop where
/-- The action fulfils a normality condition on products that lie in `H`.
This ensures that the action descends to an action on the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
inv_mul_mem : ∀ (b : β) {a a' : α}, a⁻¹ * a' ∈ H → (b • a)⁻¹ * b • a' ∈ H
/-- A typeclass for when an `AddAction β α` descends to the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
class _root_.AddAction.QuotientAction {α : Type u} (β : Type v) [AddGroup α] [AddMonoid β]
[AddAction β α] (H : AddSubgroup α) : Prop where
/-- The action fulfils a normality condition on summands that lie in `H`.
This ensures that the action descends to an action on the quotient `α ⧸ H`. -/
inv_mul_mem : ∀ (b : β) {a a' : α}, -a + a' ∈ H → -(b +ᵥ a) + (b +ᵥ a') ∈ H
attribute [to_additive] MulAction.QuotientAction
@[to_additive]
instance left_quotientAction : QuotientAction α H :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ => by rwa [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance right_quotientAction : QuotientAction (normalizer H).op H :=
⟨fun b c _ _ => by
rwa [smul_def, smul_def, smul_eq_mul_unop, smul_eq_mul_unop, mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc,
mem_normalizer_iff'.mp b.prop, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance right_quotientAction' [hH : H.Normal] : QuotientAction αᵐᵒᵖ H :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ => by
rwa [smul_eq_mul_unop, smul_eq_mul_unop, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc, hH.mem_comm_iff, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance quotient [QuotientAction β H] : MulAction β (α ⧸ H) where
smul b :=
Quotient.map' (b • ·) fun _ _ h =>
leftRel_apply.mpr <| QuotientAction.inv_mul_mem b <| leftRel_apply.mp h
one_smul q := Quotient.inductionOn' q fun a => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' (one_smul β a)
mul_smul b b' q := Quotient.inductionOn' q fun a => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' (mul_smul b b' a)
variable {β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.smul_mk [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (a : α) :
(b • QuotientGroup.mk a : α ⧸ H) = QuotientGroup.mk (b • a) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.smul_coe [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (a : α) :
b • (a : α ⧸ H) = (↑(b • a) : α ⧸ H) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Quotient.mk_smul_out [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (q : α ⧸ H) :
QuotientGroup.mk (b • q.out) = b • q := by rw [← Quotient.smul_mk, QuotientGroup.out_eq']
@[to_additive]
theorem Quotient.coe_smul_out [QuotientAction β H] (b : β) (q : α ⧸ H) : ↑(b • q.out) = b • q := by
simp
theorem _root_.QuotientGroup.out_conj_pow_minimalPeriod_mem (a : α) (q : α ⧸ H) :
q.out⁻¹ * a ^ Function.minimalPeriod (a • ·) q * q.out ∈ H := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← QuotientGroup.eq, QuotientGroup.out_eq', ← smul_eq_mul, Quotient.mk_smul_out,
eq_comm, pow_smul_eq_iff_minimalPeriod_dvd]
end QuotientAction
open QuotientGroup
/-- The canonical map to the left cosets. -/
def _root_.MulActionHom.toQuotient (H : Subgroup α) : α →[α] α ⧸ H where
toFun := (↑); map_smul' := Quotient.smul_coe H
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MulActionHom.toQuotient_apply (H : Subgroup α) (g : α) :
MulActionHom.toQuotient H g = g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance mulLeftCosetsCompSubtypeVal (H I : Subgroup α) : MulAction I (α ⧸ H) :=
MulAction.compHom (α ⧸ H) (Subgroup.subtype I)
variable (α)
variable [MulAction α β] (x : β)
/-- The canonical map from the quotient of the stabilizer to the set. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from the quotient of the stabilizer to the set. "]
def ofQuotientStabilizer (g : α ⧸ MulAction.stabilizer α x) : β :=
Quotient.liftOn' g (· • x) fun g1 g2 H =>
calc
g1 • x = g1 • (g1⁻¹ * g2) • x := congr_arg _ (leftRel_apply.mp H).symm
_ = g2 • x := by rw [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofQuotientStabilizer_mk (g : α) : ofQuotientStabilizer α x (QuotientGroup.mk g) = g • x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem ofQuotientStabilizer_mem_orbit (g) : ofQuotientStabilizer α x g ∈ orbit α x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' g fun g => ⟨g, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ofQuotientStabilizer_smul (g : α) (g' : α ⧸ MulAction.stabilizer α x) :
ofQuotientStabilizer α x (g • g') = g • ofQuotientStabilizer α x g' :=
Quotient.inductionOn' g' fun _ => mul_smul _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem injective_ofQuotientStabilizer : Function.Injective (ofQuotientStabilizer α x) :=
fun y₁ y₂ =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂' y₁ y₂ fun g₁ g₂ (H : g₁ • x = g₂ • x) =>
Quotient.sound' <| by
rw [leftRel_apply]
show (g₁⁻¹ * g₂) • x = x
rw [mul_smul, ← H, inv_smul_smul]
/-- **Orbit-stabilizer theorem**. -/
@[to_additive "Orbit-stabilizer theorem."]
noncomputable def orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer (b : β) : orbit α b ≃ α ⧸ stabilizer α b :=
Equiv.symm <|
Equiv.ofBijective (fun g => ⟨ofQuotientStabilizer α b g, ofQuotientStabilizer_mem_orbit α b g⟩)
⟨fun x y hxy => injective_ofQuotientStabilizer α b (by convert congr_arg Subtype.val hxy),
fun ⟨_, ⟨g, hgb⟩⟩ => ⟨g, Subtype.eq hgb⟩⟩
/-- Orbit-stabilizer theorem. -/
@[to_additive AddAction.orbitProdStabilizerEquivAddGroup "Orbit-stabilizer theorem."]
noncomputable def orbitProdStabilizerEquivGroup (b : β) : orbit α b × stabilizer α b ≃ α :=
(Equiv.prodCongr (orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer α _) (Equiv.refl _)).trans
Subgroup.groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup.symm
/-- Orbit-stabilizer theorem. -/
@[to_additive AddAction.card_orbit_mul_card_stabilizer_eq_card_addGroup "Orbit-stabilizer theorem."]
theorem card_orbit_mul_card_stabilizer_eq_card_group (b : β) [Fintype α] [Fintype <| orbit α b]
[Fintype <| stabilizer α b] :
Fintype.card (orbit α b) * Fintype.card (stabilizer α b) = Fintype.card α := by
rw [← Fintype.card_prod, Fintype.card_congr (orbitProdStabilizerEquivGroup α b)]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer_symm_apply (b : β) (a : α) :
((orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer α b).symm a : β) = a • b :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem stabilizer_quotient {G} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) :
MulAction.stabilizer G ((1 : G) : G ⧸ H) = H := by
ext
simp [QuotientGroup.eq]
variable (β)
local notation "Ω" => Quotient <| orbitRel α β
/-- **Class formula** : given `G` a group acting on `X` and `φ` a function mapping each orbit of `X`
under this action (that is, each element of the quotient of `X` by the relation `orbitRel G X`) to
an element in this orbit, this gives a (noncomputable) bijection between `X` and the disjoint union
of `G/Stab(φ(ω))` over all orbits `ω`. In most cases you'll want `φ` to be `Quotient.out`, so we
provide `MulAction.selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer'` as a special case. -/
@[to_additive
"**Class formula** : given `G` an additive group acting on `X` and `φ` a function
mapping each orbit of `X` under this action (that is, each element of the quotient of `X` by
the relation `orbit_rel G X`) to an element in this orbit, this gives a (noncomputable)
bijection between `X` and the disjoint union of `G/Stab(φ(ω))` over all orbits `ω`. In most
cases you'll want `φ` to be `Quotient.out`, so we provide
`AddAction.selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer'` as a special case. "]
noncomputable def selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer' {φ : Ω → β}
(hφ : LeftInverse Quotient.mk'' φ) : β ≃ Σω : Ω, α ⧸ stabilizer α (φ ω) :=
calc
β ≃ Σω : Ω, orbitRel.Quotient.orbit ω := selfEquivSigmaOrbits' α β
_ ≃ Σω : Ω, α ⧸ stabilizer α (φ ω) :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun ω =>
(Equiv.setCongr <| orbitRel.Quotient.orbit_eq_orbit_out _ hφ).trans <|
orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer α (φ ω)
/-- **Class formula** for a finite group acting on a finite type. See
`MulAction.card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer` for a specialized version using
`Quotient.out`. -/
@[to_additive
"**Class formula** for a finite group acting on a finite type. See
`AddAction.card_eq_sum_card_addGroup_div_card_stabilizer` for a specialized version using
`Quotient.out`."]
theorem card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer' [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [Fintype Ω]
[∀ b : β, Fintype <| stabilizer α b] {φ : Ω → β} (hφ : LeftInverse Quotient.mk'' φ) :
Fintype.card β = ∑ ω : Ω, Fintype.card α / Fintype.card (stabilizer α (φ ω)) := by
classical
have : ∀ ω : Ω, Fintype.card α / Fintype.card (stabilizer α (φ ω)) =
Fintype.card (α ⧸ stabilizer α (φ ω)) := by
intro ω
rw [Fintype.card_congr (@Subgroup.groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup α _ (stabilizer α <| φ ω)),
Fintype.card_prod, Nat.mul_div_cancel]
exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr (by infer_instance)
simp_rw [this, ← Fintype.card_sigma,
Fintype.card_congr (selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer' α β hφ)]
/-- **Class formula**. This is a special case of
`MulAction.self_equiv_sigma_orbits_quotient_stabilizer'` with `φ = Quotient.out`. -/
@[to_additive
"**Class formula**. This is a special case of
`AddAction.self_equiv_sigma_orbits_quotient_stabilizer'` with `φ = Quotient.out`. "]
noncomputable def selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer : β ≃ Σω : Ω, α ⧸ stabilizer α ω.out :=
selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer' α β Quotient.out_eq'
/-- **Class formula** for a finite group acting on a finite type. -/
@[to_additive "**Class formula** for a finite group acting on a finite type."]
theorem card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [Fintype Ω]
[∀ b : β, Fintype <| stabilizer α b] :
Fintype.card β = ∑ ω : Ω, Fintype.card α / Fintype.card (stabilizer α ω.out) :=
card_eq_sum_card_group_div_card_stabilizer' α β Quotient.out_eq'
/-- **Burnside's lemma** : a (noncomputable) bijection between the disjoint union of all
`{x ∈ X | g • x = x}` for `g ∈ G` and the product `G × X/G`, where `G` is a group acting on `X` and
`X/G` denotes the quotient of `X` by the relation `orbitRel G X`. -/
@[to_additive AddAction.sigmaFixedByEquivOrbitsProdAddGroup
"**Burnside's lemma** : a (noncomputable) bijection between the disjoint union of all
`{x ∈ X | g • x = x}` for `g ∈ G` and the product `G × X/G`, where `G` is an additive group
acting on `X` and `X/G`denotes the quotient of `X` by the relation `orbitRel G X`. "]
noncomputable def sigmaFixedByEquivOrbitsProdGroup : (Σa : α, fixedBy β a) ≃ Ω × α :=
calc
(Σa : α, fixedBy β a) ≃ { ab : α × β // ab.1 • ab.2 = ab.2 } :=
(Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype _).symm
_ ≃ { ba : β × α // ba.2 • ba.1 = ba.1 } := (Equiv.prodComm α β).subtypeEquiv fun _ => Iff.rfl
_ ≃ Σb : β, stabilizer α b :=
Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype fun (b : β) a => a ∈ stabilizer α b
_ ≃ Σωb : Σω : Ω, orbit α ω.out, stabilizer α (ωb.2 : β) :=
(selfEquivSigmaOrbits α β).sigmaCongrLeft'
_ ≃ Σω : Ω, Σb : orbit α ω.out, stabilizer α (b : β) :=
Equiv.sigmaAssoc fun (ω : Ω) (b : orbit α ω.out) => stabilizer α (b : β)
_ ≃ Σω : Ω, Σ _ : orbit α ω.out, stabilizer α ω.out :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun _ =>
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun ⟨_, hb⟩ => (stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel hb).toEquiv
_ ≃ Σω : Ω, orbit α ω.out × stabilizer α ω.out :=
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun _ => Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _
_ ≃ Σ _ : Ω, α := Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun ω => orbitProdStabilizerEquivGroup α ω.out
_ ≃ Ω × α := Equiv.sigmaEquivProd Ω α
/-- **Burnside's lemma** : given a finite group `G` acting on a set `X`, the average number of
elements fixed by each `g ∈ G` is the number of orbits. -/
@[to_additive AddAction.sum_card_fixedBy_eq_card_orbits_mul_card_addGroup
"**Burnside's lemma** : given a finite additive group `G` acting on a set `X`,
the average number of elements fixed by each `g ∈ G` is the number of orbits. "]
theorem sum_card_fixedBy_eq_card_orbits_mul_card_group [Fintype α] [∀ a : α, Fintype <| fixedBy β a]
[Fintype Ω] : (∑ a : α, Fintype.card (fixedBy β a)) = Fintype.card Ω * Fintype.card α := by
rw [← Fintype.card_prod, ← Fintype.card_sigma,
Fintype.card_congr (sigmaFixedByEquivOrbitsProdGroup α β)]
@[to_additive]
instance isPretransitive_quotient (G) [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : IsPretransitive G (G ⧸ H) where
exists_smul_eq := by
{ rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
refine ⟨y * x⁻¹, QuotientGroup.eq.mpr ?_⟩
simp only [smul_eq_mul, H.one_mem, inv_mul_cancel, inv_mul_cancel_right]}
variable {α}
@[to_additive]
instance finite_quotient_of_pretransitive_of_finite_quotient [IsPretransitive α β] {H : Subgroup α}
[Finite (α ⧸ H)] : Finite <| orbitRel.Quotient H β := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty β with he | ⟨⟨b⟩⟩
· exact Quotient.finite _
· have h' : Finite (Quotient (rightRel H)) :=
Finite.of_equiv _ (quotientRightRelEquivQuotientLeftRel _).symm
let f : Quotient (rightRel H) → orbitRel.Quotient H β :=
fun a ↦ Quotient.liftOn' a (fun g ↦ ⟦g • b⟧) fun g₁ g₂ r ↦ by
replace r := Setoid.symm' _ r
rw [rightRel_eq] at r
simp only [Quotient.eq, orbitRel_apply, mem_orbit_iff]
exact ⟨⟨g₁ * g₂⁻¹, r⟩, by simp [mul_smul]⟩
exact Finite.of_surjective f ((Quotient.surjective_liftOn' _).2
(Quotient.mk''_surjective.comp (MulAction.surjective_smul _ _)))
variable {β} in
/-- A bijection between the quotient of the action of a subgroup `H` on an orbit, and a
corresponding quotient expressed in terms of `Setoid.comap Subtype.val`. -/
@[to_additive "A bijection between the quotient of the action of an additive subgroup `H` on an
orbit, and a corresponding quotient expressed in terms of `Setoid.comap Subtype.val`."]
noncomputable def equivSubgroupOrbitsSetoidComap (H : Subgroup α) (ω : Ω) :
orbitRel.Quotient H (orbitRel.Quotient.orbit ω) ≃
Quotient ((orbitRel H β).comap (Subtype.val : Quotient.mk (orbitRel α β) ⁻¹' {ω} → β)) where
toFun := fun q ↦ q.liftOn' (fun x ↦ ⟦⟨↑x, by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
have hx := x.property
rwa [orbitRel.Quotient.mem_orbit] at hx⟩⟧) fun a b h ↦ by
simp only [← Quotient.eq, orbitRel.Quotient.subgroup_quotient_eq_iff] at h
simp only [Quotient.eq] at h ⊢
exact h
invFun := fun q ↦ q.liftOn' (fun x ↦ ⟦⟨↑x, by
have hx := x.property
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
rwa [orbitRel.Quotient.mem_orbit, @Quotient.mk''_eq_mk]⟩⟧) fun a b h ↦ by
rw [Setoid.comap_rel, ← Quotient.eq'', @Quotient.mk''_eq_mk] at h
simp only [orbitRel.Quotient.subgroup_quotient_eq_iff]
exact h
left_inv := by
simp only [LeftInverse]
intro q
induction q using Quotient.inductionOn'
rfl
right_inv := by
simp only [Function.RightInverse, LeftInverse]
intro q
induction q using Quotient.inductionOn'
rfl
/-- A bijection between the orbits under the action of a subgroup `H` on `β`, and the orbits
under the action of `H` on each orbit under the action of `G`. -/
@[to_additive "A bijection between the orbits under the action of an additive subgroup `H` on `β`,
and the orbits under the action of `H` on each orbit under the action of `G`."]
noncomputable def equivSubgroupOrbits (H : Subgroup α) :
orbitRel.Quotient H β ≃ Σω : Ω, orbitRel.Quotient H (orbitRel.Quotient.orbit ω) :=
(Setoid.sigmaQuotientEquivOfLe (orbitRel_subgroup_le H)).symm.trans
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun ω ↦ (equivSubgroupOrbitsSetoidComap H ω).symm)
variable {β}
@[to_additive]
instance finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient {H : Subgroup α}
[Finite (orbitRel.Quotient α β)] [Finite (α ⧸ H)] :
Finite <| orbitRel.Quotient H β := by
rw [(equivSubgroupOrbits β H).finite_iff]
infer_instance
/-- Given a group acting freely and transitively, an equivalence between the orbits under the
action of a subgroup and the quotient group. -/
@[to_additive "Given an additive group acting freely and transitively, an equivalence between the
orbits under the action of an additive subgroup and the quotient group."]
noncomputable def equivSubgroupOrbitsQuotientGroup [IsPretransitive α β]
(free : ∀ y : β, MulAction.stabilizer α y = ⊥) (H : Subgroup α) :
orbitRel.Quotient H β ≃ α ⧸ H where
toFun := fun q ↦ q.liftOn' (fun y ↦ (exists_smul_eq α y x).choose) (by
intro y₁ y₂ h
rw [orbitRel_apply] at h
rw [Quotient.eq'', leftRel_eq]
dsimp only
rcases h with ⟨g, rfl⟩
dsimp only
suffices (exists_smul_eq α (g • y₂) x).choose = (exists_smul_eq α y₂ x).choose * g⁻¹ by
simp [this]
rw [← inv_mul_eq_one, ← Subgroup.mem_bot, ← free ((g : α) • y₂)]
simp only [mem_stabilizer_iff, smul_smul, mul_assoc, InvMemClass.coe_inv, inv_mul_cancel,
mul_one]
rw [← smul_smul, (exists_smul_eq α y₂ x).choose_spec, inv_smul_eq_iff,
(exists_smul_eq α ((g : α) • y₂) x).choose_spec])
invFun := fun q ↦ q.liftOn' (fun g ↦ ⟦g⁻¹ • x⟧) (by
intro g₁ g₂ h
rw [leftRel_eq] at h
simp only
rw [← @Quotient.mk''_eq_mk, Quotient.eq'', orbitRel_apply]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, by simp [mul_smul]⟩)
left_inv := fun y ↦ by
induction' y using Quotient.inductionOn' with y
simp only [Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
rw [← @Quotient.mk''_eq_mk, Quotient.eq'', orbitRel_apply]
convert mem_orbit_self _
rw [inv_smul_eq_iff, (exists_smul_eq α y x).choose_spec]
right_inv := fun g ↦ by
induction' g using Quotient.inductionOn' with g
simp only [Quotient.liftOn'_mk'', Quotient.liftOn'_mk, QuotientGroup.mk]
rw [Quotient.eq'', leftRel_eq]
simp only
convert one_mem H
· rw [inv_mul_eq_one, eq_comm, ← inv_mul_eq_one, ← Subgroup.mem_bot, ← free (g⁻¹ • x),
mem_stabilizer_iff, mul_smul, (exists_smul_eq α (g⁻¹ • x) x).choose_spec]
/-- If `α` acts on `β` with trivial stabilizers, `β` is equivalent
to the product of the quotient of `β` by `α` and `α`.
See `MulAction.selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd` with `φ = Quotient.out`. -/
@[to_additive selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd' "If `α` acts freely on `β`, `β` is equivalent
to the product of the quotient of `β` by `α` and `α`.
See `AddAction.selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd` with `φ = Quotient.out`."]
noncomputable def selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd'
{φ : Quotient (MulAction.orbitRel α β) → β} (hφ : Function.LeftInverse Quotient.mk'' φ)
(h : ∀ b : β, MulAction.stabilizer α b = ⊥) :
β ≃ Quotient (MulAction.orbitRel α β) × α :=
(MulAction.selfEquivSigmaOrbitsQuotientStabilizer' α β hφ).trans <|
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight <| fun _ ↦
(Subgroup.quotientEquivOfEq (h _)).trans (QuotientGroup.quotientEquivSelf α)).trans <|
Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _
|
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddAction.selfEquivOrbitsQuotientSum' := AddAction.selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd'
/-- If `α` acts freely on `β`, `β` is equivalent to the product of the quotient of `β` by `α` and
`α`. -/
@[to_additive selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd
"If `α` acts freely on `β`, `β` is equivalent to the product of the quotient of `β` by
`α` and `α`."]
noncomputable def selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd (h : ∀ b : β, MulAction.stabilizer α b = ⊥) :
β ≃ Quotient (MulAction.orbitRel α β) × α :=
MulAction.selfEquivOrbitsQuotientProd' Quotient.out_eq' h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Quotient.lean | 417 | 430 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Infinite sum in the reals
This file provides lemmas about Cauchy sequences in terms of infinite sums and infinite sums valued
in the reals.
-/
open Filter Finset NNReal Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α}
/-- If the distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated by a summable series,
then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using fun n ↦ dist_nonneg.trans (hf n)
apply cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d (α := α) (f := f)
· exact_mod_cast hf
· exact_mod_cast hd
theorem cauchySeq_of_summable_dist (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) := by
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha) (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨n, fun m hnm ↦ ?_⟩)
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
refine Summable.sum_le_tsum (range _) (fun _ _ ↦ le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) ?_
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n) : dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n + m)) (f (n + m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (fun x ↦ dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m) from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h ha n
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
section summable
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
simpa using mod_cast NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg hf]
theorem summable_sigma_of_nonneg {α} {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
lift f to (Σx, β x) → ℝ≥0 using hf
simpa using mod_cast NNReal.summable_sigma
lemma summable_partition {α β : Type*} {f : β → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) {s : α → Set β}
(hs : ∀ i, ∃! j, i ∈ s j) : Summable f ↔
(∀ j, Summable fun i : s j ↦ f i) ∧ Summable fun j ↦ ∑' i : s j, f i := by
simpa only [← (Set.sigmaEquiv s hs).summable_iff] using summable_sigma_of_nonneg (fun _ ↦ hf _)
theorem summable_prod_of_nonneg {α β} {f : (α × β) → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y ↦ f (x, y)) ∧ Summable fun x ↦ ∑' y, f (x, y) :=
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).summable_iff.symm.trans <| summable_sigma_of_nonneg fun _ ↦ hf _
theorem summable_of_sum_le {ι : Type*} {f : ι → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f)
(h : ∀ u : Finset ι, ∑ x ∈ u, f x ≤ c) : Summable f :=
⟨⨆ u : Finset ι, ∑ x ∈ u, f x,
tendsto_atTop_ciSup (Finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg hf) ⟨c, fun _ ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ h u⟩⟩
|
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n)
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine (summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg hf).2 fun H => ?_
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Real.lean | 84 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).natDegree = #s - 1 := by
have H : ∀ j, j ∈ s.erase i → basisDivisor (v i) (v j) ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Ne, mem_erase, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact fun j ⟨hij₁, hj⟩ hij₂ => hij₁ (hvs hj hi hij₂.symm)
rw [← card_erase_of_mem hi, card_eq_sum_ones]
convert natDegree_prod _ _ H using 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => (natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne ?_).symm
rw [Ne, ← basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact H _ hj
theorem degree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).degree = ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree (basis_ne_zero hvs hi), natDegree_basis hvs hi]
theorem sum_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∑ j ∈ s, Lagrange.basis s v j = 1 := by
refine eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #s)]
intro i hi
rw [degree_basis hvs hi, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.pred_lt (card_ne_zero_of_mem hi)
· rw [degree_one, ← WithBot.coe_zero, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nonempty.card_pos hs
· intro i hi
rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_one, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi, eval_basis_self hvs hi,
add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi]
theorem basisDivisor_add_symm {x y : F} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
basisDivisor x y + basisDivisor y x = 1 := by
classical
rw [← sum_basis Function.injective_id.injOn ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ {y}⟩,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hxy), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hxy,
basis_pair_right hxy, id, id]
end Basis
section Interpolate
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s t : Finset ι} {i j : ι} {v : ι → F} (r r' : ι → F)
open Finset
/-- Lagrange interpolation: given a finset `s : Finset ι`, a nodal map `v : ι → F` injective on
`s` and a value function `r : ι → F`, `interpolate s v r` is the unique
polynomial of degree `< #s` that takes value `r i` on `v i` for all `i` in `s`. -/
@[simps]
def interpolate (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) : (ι → F) →ₗ[F] F[X] where
toFun r := ∑ i ∈ s, C (r i) * Lagrange.basis s v i
map_add' f g := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have h : (fun x => C (f x) * Lagrange.basis s v x + C (g x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) =
(fun x => C ((f + g) x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) := by
simp_rw [← add_mul, ← C_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [h]
map_smul' c f := by
simp_rw [Finset.smul_sum, C_mul', smul_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem interpolate_empty : interpolate ∅ v r = 0 := by rw [interpolate_apply, sum_empty]
theorem interpolate_singleton : interpolate {i} v r = C (r i) := by
rw [interpolate_apply, sum_singleton, basis_singleton, mul_one]
theorem interpolate_one (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : interpolate s v 1 = 1 := by
simp_rw [interpolate_apply, Pi.one_apply, map_one, one_mul]
exact sum_basis hvs hs
theorem eval_interpolate_at_node (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
eval (v i) (interpolate s v r) = r i := by
rw [interpolate_apply, eval_finset_sum, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi]
simp_rw [eval_mul, eval_C, eval_basis_self hvs hi, mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basis_of_ne (mem_erase.mp H).1 hi, mul_zero]
theorem degree_interpolate_le (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(interpolate s v r).degree ≤ ↑(#s - 1) := by
refine (degree_sum_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro i hi
rw [degree_mul, degree_basis hvs hi]
by_cases hr : r i = 0
· simpa only [hr, map_zero, degree_zero, WithBot.bot_add] using bot_le
· rw [degree_C hr, zero_add]
theorem degree_interpolate_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : (interpolate s v r).degree < #s := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h)
· rw [interpolate_empty, degree_zero, card_empty]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_interpolate_le _ hvs) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.sub_lt (Nonempty.card_pos h) zero_lt_one
theorem degree_interpolate_erase_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(interpolate (s.erase i) v r).degree < ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [← Finset.card_erase_of_mem hi]
exact degree_interpolate_lt _ (Set.InjOn.mono (coe_subset.mpr (erase_subset _ _)) hvs)
theorem values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(hrr' : interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r') : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i := fun _ hi => by
rw [← eval_interpolate_at_node r hvs hi, hrr', eval_interpolate_at_node r' hvs hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on (hrr' : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi => by rw [hrr' _ hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_iff_values_eq_on (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i :=
⟨values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq _ _ hvs, interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _⟩
theorem eq_interpolate {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) :
f = interpolate s v fun i => f.eval (v i) :=
eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs degree_f_lt (degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs) fun _ hi =>
(eval_interpolate_at_node (fun x ↦ eval (v x) f) hvs hi).symm
theorem eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = r i) : f = interpolate s v r := by
rw [eq_interpolate hvs degree_f_lt]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ eval_f
/-- This is the characteristic property of the interpolation: the interpolation is the
unique polynomial of `degree < Fintype.card ι` which takes the value of the `r i` on the `v i`.
-/
theorem eq_interpolate_iff {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(f.degree < #s ∧ ∀ i ∈ s, eval (v i) f = r i) ↔ f = interpolate s v r := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvs h.1 h.2
· rw [h]
exact ⟨degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs, fun _ hi => eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi⟩
/-- Lagrange interpolation induces isomorphism between functions from `s`
and polynomials of degree less than `Fintype.card ι`. -/
def funEquivDegreeLT (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : degreeLT F #s ≃ₗ[F] s → F where
toFun f i := f.1.eval (v i)
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ => eval_add
map_smul' c f := funext <| by simp
invFun r :=
⟨interpolate s v fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then r ⟨x, hx⟩ else 0,
mem_degreeLT.2 <| degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, dite_eq_ite]
rw [mem_degreeLT] at hf
conv => rhs; rw [eq_interpolate hvs hf]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ fun _ hi => if_pos hi
right_inv := by
intro f
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi]
exact dif_pos hi
theorem interpolate_eq_sum_interpolate_insert_sdiff (hvt : Set.InjOn v t) (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hst : s ⊆ t) :
interpolate t v r = ∑ i ∈ s, interpolate (insert i (t \ s)) v r * Lagrange.basis s v i := by
symm
refine eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvt (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) fun i hi => ?_
· simp_rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #t), degree_mul]
intro i hi
have hs : 1 ≤ #s := Nonempty.card_pos ⟨_, hi⟩
have hst' : #s ≤ #t := card_le_card hst
have H : #t = 1 + (#t - #s) + (#s - 1) := by
rw [add_assoc, tsub_add_tsub_cancel hst' hs, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (hs.trans hst'),
Nat.succ_add_sub_one, zero_add]
rw [degree_basis (Set.InjOn.mono hst hvt) hi, H, WithBot.coe_add, Nat.cast_withBot,
WithBot.add_lt_add_iff_right (@WithBot.coe_ne_bot _ (#s - 1))]
convert degree_interpolate_lt _
(hvt.mono (coe_subset.mpr (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hst hi, sdiff_subset⟩)))
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hi), card_sdiff hst, add_comm]
· simp_rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_mul]
by_cases hi' : i ∈ s
· rw [← add_sum_erase _ _ hi', eval_basis_self (hvt.mono hst) hi',
eval_interpolate_at_node _
(hvt.mono (coe_subset.mpr (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hi, sdiff_subset⟩)))
(mem_insert_self _ _),
mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi', mul_zero]
· have H : (∑ j ∈ s, eval (v i) (Lagrange.basis s v j)) = 1 := by
rw [← eval_finset_sum, sum_basis (hvt.mono hst) hs, eval_one]
rw [← mul_one (r i), ← H, mul_sum]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
congr
exact
eval_interpolate_at_node _ (hvt.mono (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hst hj, sdiff_subset⟩))
(mem_insert.mpr (Or.inr (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hi, hi'⟩)))
theorem interpolate_eq_add_interpolate_erase (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(hij : i ≠ j) :
interpolate s v r =
interpolate (s.erase j) v r * basisDivisor (v i) (v j) +
interpolate (s.erase i) v r * basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [interpolate_eq_sum_interpolate_insert_sdiff _ hvs ⟨i, mem_insert_self i {j}⟩ _,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hij,
basis_pair_right hij, sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem hi (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij),
sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, pair_comm,
sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem hj (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij.symm),
sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
exact insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hi, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hj⟩
end Interpolate
section Nodal
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*}
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → R}
open Finset Polynomial
/-- `nodal s v` is the unique monic polynomial whose roots are the nodes defined by `v` and `s`.
That is, the roots of `nodal s v` are exactly the image of `v` on `s`,
with appropriate multiplicity.
We can use `nodal` to define the barycentric forms of the evaluated interpolant.
-/
def nodal (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → R) : R[X] :=
∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (v i))
theorem nodal_eq (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → R) : nodal s v = ∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (v i)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodal_empty : nodal ∅ v = 1 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_nodal [Nontrivial R] : (nodal s v).natDegree = #s := by
simp_rw [nodal, natDegree_prod_of_monic (h := fun i _ => monic_X_sub_C (v i)),
natDegree_X_sub_C, sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem nodal_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : nodal s v ≠ 0 := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | h)
· exact one_ne_zero
· apply ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt (n := 0)
simp only [natDegree_nodal, h.card_pos]
@[simp]
| theorem degree_nodal [Nontrivial R] : (nodal s v).degree = #s := by
simp_rw [degree_eq_natDegree nodal_ne_zero, natDegree_nodal]
theorem nodal_monic : (nodal s v).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic s (fun i ↦ X - C (v i)) fun i _ ↦ monic_X_sub_C (v i)
theorem eval_nodal {x : R} : (nodal s v).eval x = ∏ i ∈ s, (x - v i) := by
simp_rw [nodal, eval_prod, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C]
theorem eval_nodal_at_node {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : eval (v i) (nodal s v) = 0 := by
rw [eval_nodal]
exact s.prod_eq_zero hi (sub_self (v i))
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 480 | 491 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| compl u hu ihu =>
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at ihu ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← ihu,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at ihf ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, ihf]
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
open scoped Interval in
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
open scoped Interval in
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
-- note that we cannot use `ae_restrict_iff` since we do not require measurability
refine hfg.filter_mono ?_
rw [Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous]
exact Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
(ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 (Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _ => id)
theorem ae_restrict_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
ae_restrict_mem₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_restrict_of_forall_mem {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
(ae_restrict_mem hs).mono h
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self)
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset {s t : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono <| Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ))
theorem ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl (t : Set α) {p : α → Prop}
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) (htc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict tᶜ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <|
calc
μ { x | ¬p x } ≤ μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ t) + μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ tᶜ) :=
measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict t { x | ¬p x } + μ.restrict tᶜ { x | ¬p x } :=
add_le_add (le_restrict_apply _ _) (le_restrict_apply _ _)
_ = 0 := by rw [ae_iff.1 ht, ae_iff.1 htc, zero_add]
theorem mem_map_restrict_ae_iff {β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map f (ae (μ.restrict s)) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply' hs]
theorem ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_comp' {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') (h2 : μ.map f ≪ ν) : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).mono_right h2.ae_le h
theorem Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf.aemeasurable h hf.absolutelyContinuous
theorem ae_eq_comp {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : g =ᵐ[μ.map f] g') :
g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf h AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ae_eq_one {β} [Group β] (f g : α → β) : f / g =ᵐ[μ] 1 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one] at hx
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive sub_nonneg_ae]
lemma one_le_div_ae {β : Type*} [Group β] [LE β] [MulRightMono β] (f g : α → β) :
1 ≤ᵐ[μ] g / f ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div'] at ha
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div']
theorem le_ae_restrict : ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ ae (μ.restrict s) := fun _s hs =>
eventually_inf_principal.2 (ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hs)
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ae (μ.restrict s) = ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext t
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_setOf,
Classical.not_imp, fun a => and_comm (a := a ∈ s) (b := ¬a ∈ t)]
rfl
lemma ae_restrict_le : ae (μ.restrict s) ≤ ae μ :=
ae_mono restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : ae (μ.restrict s) = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans restrict_eq_zero
theorem ae_restrict_neBot {s} : (ae <| μ.restrict s).NeBot ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans ae_restrict_eq_bot.not
theorem self_mem_ae_restrict {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (μ.restrict s) := by
simp only [ae_restrict_eq hs, exists_prop, mem_principal, mem_inf_iff]
exact ⟨_, univ_mem, s, Subset.rfl, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_congr_set {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x :=
⟨ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst, ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst.symm⟩
lemma NullMeasurable.measure_preimage_eq_measure_restrict_preimage_of_ae_compl_eq_const
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {b : β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(f_mble : NullMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hs : f =ᵐ[Measure.restrict μ sᶜ] (fun _ ↦ b))
{t : Set β} (t_mble : MeasurableSet t) (ht : b ∉ t) :
μ (f ⁻¹' t) = μ.restrict s (f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀ (f_mble t_mble)]
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply₀] at hs
· apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono inter_subset_left)
apply (measure_mono (Eq.symm (inter_union_compl (f ⁻¹' t) s)).le).trans
apply (measure_union_le _ _).trans
have obs : μ ((f ⁻¹' t) ∩ sᶜ) = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← hs]
apply measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ _)
intro x hx hfx
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_setOf_eq] at hx hfx
exact ht (hfx ▸ hx)
simp only [obs, add_zero, le_refl]
· exact NullMeasurableSet.of_null hs
namespace Measure
section Subtype
/-! ### Subtype of a measure space -/
section ComapAnyMeasure
theorem MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ := by
rw [Subtype.instMeasurableSpace, comap_eq_generateFrom] at ht
induction t, ht using generateFrom_induction with
| hC t' ht' =>
obtain ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩ := ht'
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter (hs'.nullMeasurableSet)
| empty => simp only [image_empty, nullMeasurableSet_empty]
| compl t' _ ht' =>
simp only [← range_diff_image Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
exact hs.diff ht'
| iUnion f _ hf =>
dsimp only []
rw [image_iUnion]
exact .iUnion hf
theorem NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.comap Subtype.val)) : NullMeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) μ :=
NullMeasurableSet.image _ μ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun _ => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) ht
theorem measure_subtype_coe_le_comap (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set s) :
μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) ≤ μ.comap Subtype.val t :=
le_comap_apply _ _ Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) _
theorem measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) {t : Set s}
(ht : μ.comap Subtype.val t = 0) : μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| (measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hs t).trans ht.le
end ComapAnyMeasure
section MeasureSpace
variable {u : Set δ} [MeasureSpace δ] {p : δ → Prop}
/-- In a measure space, one can restrict the measure to a subtype to get a new measure space.
Not registered as an instance, as there are other natural choices such as the normalized restriction
for a probability measure, or the subspace measure when restricting to a vector subspace. Enable
locally if needed with `attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace`. -/
noncomputable def Subtype.measureSpace : MeasureSpace (Subtype p) where
volume := Measure.comap Subtype.val volume
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem Subtype.volume_def : (volume : Measure u) = volume.comap Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem Subtype.volume_univ (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) : volume (univ : Set u) = volume u := by
rw [Subtype.volume_def, comap_apply₀ _ _ _ _ MeasurableSet.univ.nullMeasurableSet]
· congr
simp only [image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
· exact fun t => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hu
theorem volume_subtype_coe_le_volume (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) (t : Set u) :
volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) ≤ volume t :=
measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hu t
theorem volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) {t : Set u}
(ht : volume t = 0) : volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) = 0 :=
measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero hu ht
end MeasureSpace
end Subtype
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory Measure
namespace MeasurableEmbedding
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m1 : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
section
variable (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
include hf
theorem map_comap (μ : Measure β) : (comap f μ).map f = μ.restrict (range f) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [hf.map_apply, comap_apply f hf.injective hf.measurableSet_image' _ (hf.measurable ht),
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
theorem comap_apply (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
calc
comap f μ s = comap f μ (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := by rw [hf.injective.preimage_image]
_ = (comap f μ).map f (f '' s) := (hf.map_apply _ _).symm
_ = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset_range _ _)]
theorem comap_map (μ : Measure α) : (map f μ).comap f = μ := by
ext t _
rw [hf.comap_apply, hf.map_apply, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem ae_map_iff {p : β → Prop} {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) := by
simp only [ae_iff, hf.map_apply, preimage_setOf_eq]
theorem restrict_map (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
Measure.ext fun t ht => by simp [hf.map_apply, ht, hf.measurable ht]
protected theorem comap_preimage (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.map_apply, hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range]
lemma comap_restrict (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).comap f = (μ.comap f).restrict (f ⁻¹' s) := by
ext t ht
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, comap_apply hf, comap_apply hf,
Measure.restrict_apply (hf.measurableSet_image.2 ht), image_inter_preimage]
lemma restrict_comap (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) :
(μ.comap f).restrict s = (μ.restrict (f '' s)).comap f := by
rw [comap_restrict hf, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
end
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map e).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| e ⁻¹' s).map e :=
e.measurableEmbedding.restrict_map _ _
end MeasurableEmbedding
section Subtype
theorem comap_subtype_coe_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) (t : Set s) : comap (↑) μ t = μ ((↑) '' t) :=
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).comap_apply _ _
theorem map_comap_subtype_coe {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) : (comap (↑) μ).map ((↑) : s → α) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem ae_restrict_iff_subtype {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ (x : s) ∂comap ((↑) : s → α) μ, p x := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).ae_map_iff]
variable [MeasureSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-!
### Volume on `s : Set α`
Note the instance is provided earlier as `Subtype.measureSpace`.
-/
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem volume_set_coe_def (s : Set α) : (volume : Measure s) = comap ((↑) : s → α) volume :=
rfl
theorem MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
volume.map ((↑) : s → α) = restrict volume s := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap volume, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem volume_image_subtype_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) :
volume ((↑) '' t : Set α) = volume t :=
(comap_subtype_coe_apply hs volume t).symm
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_coe (hs : NullMeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
volume (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = volume (t ∩ s) := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def,
comap_apply₀ _ _ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun h => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs)
(measurable_subtype_coe ht).nullMeasurableSet,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
end Subtype
section Piecewise
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f g : α → β}
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs]
exact (piecewise_eqOn s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl]
exact (piecewise_eqOn_compl s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)]
(hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.piecewise f g =ᵐ[μ] t.piecewise f g :=
hst.mem_iff.mono fun x hx => by simp [piecewise, hx]
end Piecewise
section IndicatorFunction
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem [Zero β] {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∈ t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ t ∈ Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) := by
classical
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite]
simp_rw [Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0
simp only [ht, ← Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, compl_compl, Set.compl_union, if_true,
Set.preimage_const]
simp_rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right, Set.compl_inter_self s, Set.union_empty]
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem [Zero β] {t : Set β} (ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0 := by
classical
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite, Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0
simp only [ht, if_false, Set.compl_empty, Set.empty_diff, Set.inter_univ, Set.preimage_const]
theorem map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae [Zero β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) ≤ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) := by
intro t
by_cases ht : (0 : β) ∈ t
· rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem ht hs]
exact id
rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem ht, mem_map_restrict_ae_iff hs]
exact fun h => measure_mono_null (Set.inter_subset_left.trans Set.subset_union_left) h
variable [Zero β]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs.compl] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hx hxs, Pi.zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_zero_of_restrict_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, hx hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp [hx, hxs]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hst
theorem indicator_meas_zero (hs : μ s = 0) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
indicator_empty' f ▸ indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (ae_eq_empty.2 hs)
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iff_indicator_ae_eq {g : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g ↔ s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator g := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> filter_upwards [h] with x hx
· by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp [hxs, hx hxs]
· simp [hxs]
· intro hxs
simpa [hxs] using hx
end IndicatorFunction
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 1,046 | 1,053 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ` -/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit` -/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")]
alias nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse := nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
lemma inv_mulVec_eq_vec {A : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A]
{u v : n → α} (hM : u = A.mulVec v) : A⁻¹.mulVec u = v := by
rw [hM, Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible, Matrix.one_mulVec]
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse
[DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse
[DecidableEq m] [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable [DecidableEq m] {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.row ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← col_transpose, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.col ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← row_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit, isUnit_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.row :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.col :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ringInverse]
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹ ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_isUnit_det, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
| rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 481 | 488 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 501 | 503 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.MonoOver
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
/-!
# Subobjects
We define `Subobject X` as the quotient (by isomorphisms) of
`MonoOver X := {f : Over X // Mono f.hom}`.
Here `MonoOver X` is a thin category (a pair of objects has at most one morphism between them),
so we can think of it as a preorder. However as it is not skeletal, it is not a partial order.
There is a coercion from `Subobject X` back to the ambient category `C`
(using choice to pick a representative), and for `P : Subobject X`,
`P.arrow : (P : C) ⟶ X` is the inclusion morphism.
We provide
* `def pullback [HasPullbacks C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X`
* `def map (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
* `def «exists_» [HasImages C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
and prove their basic properties and relationships.
These are all easy consequences of the earlier development
of the corresponding functors for `MonoOver`.
The subobjects of `X` form a preorder making them into a category. We have `X ≤ Y` if and only if
`X.arrow` factors through `Y.arrow`: see `ofLE`/`ofLEMk`/`ofMkLE`/`ofMkLEMk` and
`le_of_comm`. Similarly, to show that two subobjects are equal, we can supply an isomorphism between
the underlying objects that commutes with the arrows (`eq_of_comm`).
See also
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru` :
an API describing factorization of morphisms through subobjects.
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.lattice` :
the lattice structures on subobjects.
## Notes
This development originally appeared in Bhavik Mehta's "Topos theory for Lean" repository,
and was ported to mathlib by Kim Morrison.
### Implementation note
Currently we describe `pullback`, `map`, etc., as functors.
It may be better to just say that they are monotone functions,
and even avoid using categorical language entirely when describing `Subobject X`.
(It's worth keeping this in mind in future use; it should be a relatively easy change here
if it looks preferable.)
### Relation to pseudoelements
There is a separate development of pseudoelements in `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`,
as a quotient (but not by isomorphism) of `Over X`.
When a morphism `f` has an image, the image represents the same pseudoelement.
In a category with images `Pseudoelements X` could be constructed as a quotient of `MonoOver X`.
In fact, in an abelian category (I'm not sure in what generality beyond that),
`Pseudoelements X` agrees with `Subobject X`, but we haven't developed this in mathlib yet.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-!
We now construct the subobject lattice for `X : C`,
as the quotient by isomorphisms of `MonoOver X`.
Since `MonoOver X` is a thin category, we use `ThinSkeleton` to take the quotient.
Essentially all the structure defined above on `MonoOver X` descends to `Subobject X`,
with morphisms becoming inequalities, and isomorphisms becoming equations.
-/
/-- The category of subobjects of `X : C`, defined as isomorphism classes of monomorphisms into `X`.
-/
def Subobject (X : C) :=
ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X)
instance (X : C) : PartialOrder (Subobject X) :=
inferInstanceAs <| PartialOrder (ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X))
namespace Subobject
-- Porting note: made it a def rather than an abbreviation
-- because Lean would make it too transparent
/-- Convenience constructor for a subobject. -/
def mk {X A : C} (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject X :=
(toThinSkeleton _).obj (MonoOver.mk' f)
section
attribute [local ext] CategoryTheory.Comma
protected theorem ind {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], p (Subobject.mk f)) (P : Subobject X) : p P := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn'
intro a
exact h a.arrow
protected theorem ind₂ {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g],
p (Subobject.mk f) (Subobject.mk g))
(P Q : Subobject X) : p P Q := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn₂'
intro a b
exact h a.arrow b.arrow
end
/-- Declare a function on subobjects of `X` by specifying a function on monomorphisms with
codomain `X`. -/
protected def lift {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α)
(h :
∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A ≅ B),
i.hom ≫ g = f → F f = F g) :
Subobject X → α := fun P =>
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun m => F m.arrow) fun m n ⟨i⟩ =>
h m.arrow n.arrow ((MonoOver.forget X ⋙ Over.forget X).mapIso i) (Over.w i.hom)
@[simp]
protected theorem lift_mk {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α) {h A}
(f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject.lift F h (Subobject.mk f) = F f :=
rfl
/-- The category of subobjects is equivalent to the `MonoOver` category. It is more convenient to
use the former due to the partial order instance, but oftentimes it is easier to define structures
on the latter. -/
noncomputable def equivMonoOver (X : C) : Subobject X ≌ MonoOver X :=
ThinSkeleton.equivalence _
/-- Use choice to pick a representative `MonoOver X` for each `Subobject X`.
-/
noncomputable def representative {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ MonoOver X :=
(equivMonoOver X).functor
instance : (representative (X := X)).IsEquivalence :=
(equivMonoOver X).isEquivalence_functor
/-- Starting with `A : MonoOver X`, we can take its equivalence class in `Subobject X`
then pick an arbitrary representative using `representative.obj`.
This is isomorphic (in `MonoOver X`) to the original `A`.
-/
noncomputable def representativeIso {X : C} (A : MonoOver X) :
representative.obj ((toThinSkeleton _).obj A) ≅ A :=
(equivMonoOver X).counitIso.app A
/-- Use choice to pick a representative underlying object in `C` for any `Subobject X`.
Prefer to use the coercion `P : C` rather than explicitly writing `underlying.obj P`.
-/
noncomputable def underlying {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ C :=
representative ⋙ MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _
instance : CoeOut (Subobject X) C where coe Y := underlying.obj Y
-- Porting note: removed as it has become a syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem underlying_as_coe {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : underlying.obj P = P :=
-- rfl
/-- If we construct a `Subobject Y` from an explicit `f : X ⟶ Y` with `[Mono f]`,
then pick an arbitrary choice of underlying object `(Subobject.mk f : C)` back in `C`,
it is isomorphic (in `C`) to the original `X`.
-/
noncomputable def underlyingIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (Subobject.mk f : C) ≅ X :=
(MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _).mapIso (representativeIso (MonoOver.mk' f))
/-- The morphism in `C` from the arbitrarily chosen underlying object to the ambient object.
-/
noncomputable def arrow {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : (Y : C) ⟶ X :=
(representative.obj Y).obj.hom
instance arrow_mono {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : Mono Y.arrow :=
(representative.obj Y).property
@[simp]
theorem arrow_congr {A : C} (X Y : Subobject A) (h : X = Y) :
eqToHom (congr_arg (fun X : Subobject A => (X : C)) h) ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow := by
induction h
simp
@[simp]
theorem representative_coe (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y : C) = (Y : C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem representative_arrow (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y).arrow = Y.arrow :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlying_arrow {X : C} {Y Z : Subobject X} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
underlying.map f ≫ arrow Z = arrow Y :=
Over.w (representative.map f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_arrow {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ (Subobject.mk f).arrow = f :=
Over.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).hom ≫ f = (mk f).arrow :=
(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).1 (underlyingIso_arrow f).symm
/-- Two morphisms into a subobject are equal exactly if
the morphisms into the ambient object are equal -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comp_arrow_eq {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f g : X ⟶ P}
(h : f ≫ P.arrow = g ≫ P.arrow) : f = g :=
(cancel_mono P.arrow).mp h
theorem mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂] (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
(w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) : mk f₁ ≤ mk f₂ :=
⟨MonoOver.homMk _ w⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_arrow (P : Subobject X) : mk P.arrow = P :=
Quotient.inductionOn' P fun Q => by
obtain ⟨e⟩ := @Quotient.mk_out' _ (isIsomorphicSetoid _) Q
exact Quotient.sound' ⟨MonoOver.isoMk (Iso.refl _) ≪≫ e⟩
theorem le_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C)) (w : f ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) :
X ≤ Y := by
convert mk_le_mk_of_comm _ w <;> simp
theorem le_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : (X : C) ⟶ A)
(w : g ≫ f = X.arrow) : X ≤ mk f :=
le_of_comm (g ≫ (underlyingIso f).inv) <| by simp [w]
theorem mk_le_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : A ⟶ (X : C))
(w : g ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f ≤ X :=
le_of_comm ((underlyingIso f).hom ≫ g) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem eq_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C))
(w : f.hom ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) : X = Y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_comm f.hom w) <| le_of_comm f.inv <| f.inv_comp_eq.2 w.symm
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem eq_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : (X : C) ≅ A)
(w : i.hom ≫ f = X.arrow) : X = mk f :=
eq_of_comm (i.trans (underlyingIso f).symm) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : A ≅ (X : C))
(w : i.hom ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f = X :=
Eq.symm <| eq_mk_of_comm _ i.symm <| by rw [Iso.symm_hom, Iso.inv_comp_eq, w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A₁ ≅ A₂)
(w : i.hom ≫ g = f) : mk f = mk g :=
eq_mk_of_comm _ ((underlyingIso f).trans i) <| by simp [w]
lemma mk_surjective {X : C} (S : Subobject X) :
∃ (A : C) (i : A ⟶ X) (_ : Mono i), S = Subobject.mk i :=
⟨_, S.arrow, inferInstance, by simp⟩
-- We make `X` and `Y` explicit arguments here so that when `ofLE` appears in goal statements
-- it is possible to see its source and target
-- (`h` will just display as `_`, because it is in `Prop`).
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofLE {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C) :=
underlying.map <| h.hom
|
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_arrow {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (h : X ≤ Y) : ofLE X Y h ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Basic.lean | 290 | 292 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
/-!
# Topological lattices
In this file we define mixin classes `ContinuousInf` and `ContinuousSup`. We define the
class `TopologicalLattice` as a topological space and lattice `L` extending `ContinuousInf` and
`ContinuousSup`.
## References
* [Gierz et al, A Compendium of Continuous Lattices][GierzEtAl1980]
## Tags
topological, lattice
-/
open Filter
open Topology
/-- Let `L` be a topological space and let `L×L` be equipped with the product topology and let
`⊓:L×L → L` be an infimum. Then `L` is said to have *(jointly) continuous infimum* if the map
`⊓:L×L → L` is continuous.
-/
class ContinuousInf (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L] [Min L] : Prop where
/-- The infimum is continuous -/
continuous_inf : Continuous fun p : L × L => p.1 ⊓ p.2
/-- Let `L` be a topological space and let `L×L` be equipped with the product topology and let
`⊓:L×L → L` be a supremum. Then `L` is said to have *(jointly) continuous supremum* if the map
`⊓:L×L → L` is continuous.
-/
class ContinuousSup (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L] [Max L] : Prop where
/-- The supremum is continuous -/
continuous_sup : Continuous fun p : L × L => p.1 ⊔ p.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.continuousSup (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L] [Min L]
[ContinuousInf L] : ContinuousSup Lᵒᵈ where
continuous_sup := @ContinuousInf.continuous_inf L _ _ _
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.continuousInf (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L] [Max L]
[ContinuousSup L] : ContinuousInf Lᵒᵈ where
continuous_inf := @ContinuousSup.continuous_sup L _ _ _
/-- Let `L` be a lattice equipped with a topology such that `L` has continuous infimum and supremum.
Then `L` is said to be a *topological lattice*.
-/
class TopologicalLattice (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L] [Lattice L] : Prop
extends ContinuousInf L, ContinuousSup L
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.topologicalLattice (L : Type*) [TopologicalSpace L]
[Lattice L] [TopologicalLattice L] : TopologicalLattice Lᵒᵈ where
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrder.topologicalLattice {L : Type*} [TopologicalSpace L]
[LinearOrder L] [OrderClosedTopology L] : TopologicalLattice L where
continuous_inf := continuous_min
continuous_sup := continuous_max
variable {L X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace L] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_inf [Min L] [ContinuousInf L] : Continuous fun p : L × L => p.1 ⊓ p.2 :=
ContinuousInf.continuous_inf
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.inf [Min L] [ContinuousInf L] {f g : X → L} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun x => f x ⊓ g x :=
continuous_inf.comp (hf.prodMk hg :)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sup [Max L] [ContinuousSup L] : Continuous fun p : L × L => p.1 ⊔ p.2 :=
ContinuousSup.continuous_sup
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.sup [Max L] [ContinuousSup L] {f g : X → L} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun x => f x ⊔ g x :=
continuous_sup.comp (hf.prodMk hg :)
namespace Filter.Tendsto
section SupInf
variable {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → L} {x y : L}
lemma sup_nhds' [Max L] [ContinuousSup L] (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (f ⊔ g) l (𝓝 (x ⊔ y)) :=
(continuous_sup.tendsto _).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
lemma sup_nhds [Max L] [ContinuousSup L] (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun i => f i ⊔ g i) l (𝓝 (x ⊔ y)) :=
hf.sup_nhds' hg
lemma inf_nhds' [Min L] [ContinuousInf L] (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (f ⊓ g) l (𝓝 (x ⊓ y)) :=
(continuous_inf.tendsto _).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
lemma inf_nhds [Min L] [ContinuousInf L] (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun i => f i ⊓ g i) l (𝓝 (x ⊓ y)) :=
hf.inf_nhds' hg
end SupInf
open Finset
variable {ι α : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α → L} {l : Filter α} {g : ι → L}
lemma finset_sup'_nhds [SemilatticeSup L] [ContinuousSup L]
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (s.sup' hne f) l (𝓝 (s.sup' hne g)) := by
induction hne using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simpa using hs
| cons a s ha hne ihs =>
rw [forall_mem_cons] at hs
simp only [sup'_cons, hne]
exact hs.1.sup_nhds (ihs hs.2)
lemma finset_sup'_nhds_apply [SemilatticeSup L] [ContinuousSup L]
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ s.sup' hne (f · a)) l (𝓝 (s.sup' hne g)) := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup'_apply] using finset_sup'_nhds hne hs
lemma finset_inf'_nhds [SemilatticeInf L] [ContinuousInf L]
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (s.inf' hne f) l (𝓝 (s.inf' hne g)) :=
finset_sup'_nhds (L := Lᵒᵈ) hne hs
lemma finset_inf'_nhds_apply [SemilatticeInf L] [ContinuousInf L]
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ s.inf' hne (f · a)) l (𝓝 (s.inf' hne g)) :=
finset_sup'_nhds_apply (L := Lᵒᵈ) hne hs
lemma finset_sup_nhds [SemilatticeSup L] [OrderBot L] [ContinuousSup L]
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) : Tendsto (s.sup f) l (𝓝 (s.sup g)) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· simpa using tendsto_const_nhds
· simp only [← sup'_eq_sup hne]
exact finset_sup'_nhds hne hs
lemma finset_sup_nhds_apply [SemilatticeSup L] [OrderBot L] [ContinuousSup L]
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ s.sup (f · a)) l (𝓝 (s.sup g)) := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup_apply] using finset_sup_nhds hs
lemma finset_inf_nhds [SemilatticeInf L] [OrderTop L] [ContinuousInf L]
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) : Tendsto (s.inf f) l (𝓝 (s.inf g)) :=
finset_sup_nhds (L := Lᵒᵈ) hs
lemma finset_inf_nhds_apply [SemilatticeInf L] [OrderTop L] [ContinuousInf L]
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) l (𝓝 (g i))) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ s.inf (f · a)) l (𝓝 (s.inf g)) :=
finset_sup_nhds_apply (L := Lᵒᵈ) hs
end Filter.Tendsto
section Sup
variable [Max L] [ContinuousSup L] {f g : X → L} {s : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.sup' (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (f ⊔ g) x :=
hf.sup_nhds' hg
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousAt.sup (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ f a ⊔ g a) x :=
hf.sup' hg
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.sup' (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ⊔ g) s x :=
hf.sup_nhds' hg
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.sup (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ f a ⊔ g a) s x :=
hf.sup' hg
lemma ContinuousOn.sup' (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (f ⊔ g) s := fun x hx ↦
(hf x hx).sup' (hg x hx)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.sup (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ f a ⊔ g a) s :=
hf.sup' hg
lemma Continuous.sup' (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous (f ⊔ g) := hf.sup hg
end Sup
section Inf
variable [Min L] [ContinuousInf L] {f g : X → L} {s : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.inf' (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (f ⊓ g) x :=
hf.inf_nhds' hg
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousAt.inf (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ f a ⊓ g a) x :=
hf.inf' hg
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.inf' (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ⊓ g) s x :=
hf.inf_nhds' hg
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.inf (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ f a ⊓ g a) s x :=
hf.inf' hg
lemma ContinuousOn.inf' (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (f ⊓ g) s := fun x hx ↦
(hf x hx).inf' (hg x hx)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.inf (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ f a ⊓ g a) s :=
hf.inf' hg
lemma Continuous.inf' (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous (f ⊓ g) := hf.inf hg
end Inf
section FinsetSup'
variable {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup L] [ContinuousSup L] {s : Finset ι}
{f : ι → X → L} {t : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_sup'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ s.sup' hne (f · a)) x :=
Tendsto.finset_sup'_nhds_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_sup' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (s.sup' hne f) x := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup'_apply] using finset_sup'_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ s.sup' hne (f · a)) t x :=
Tendsto.finset_sup'_nhds_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup' (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) : ContinuousWithinAt (s.sup' hne f) t x := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup'_apply] using finset_sup'_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_sup'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ s.sup' hne (f · a)) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup'_apply hne fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_sup' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (s.sup' hne f) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup' hne fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma Continuous.finset_sup'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) :
Continuous (fun a ↦ s.sup' hne (f · a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_sup'_apply _ fun i hi ↦
(hs i hi).continuousAt
lemma Continuous.finset_sup' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) :
Continuous (s.sup' hne f) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_sup' _ fun i hi ↦ (hs i hi).continuousAt
end FinsetSup'
section FinsetSup
variable {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup L] [OrderBot L] [ContinuousSup L] {s : Finset ι}
{f : ι → X → L} {t : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_sup_apply (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ s.sup (f · a)) x :=
Tendsto.finset_sup_nhds_apply hs
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_sup (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (s.sup f) x := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup_apply] using finset_sup_apply hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup_apply
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ s.sup (f · a)) t x :=
Tendsto.finset_sup_nhds_apply hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) : ContinuousWithinAt (s.sup f) t x := by
simpa only [← Finset.sup_apply] using finset_sup_apply hs
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_sup_apply (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ s.sup (f · a)) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup_apply fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_sup (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (s.sup f) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_sup fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma Continuous.finset_sup_apply (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) :
Continuous (fun a ↦ s.sup (f · a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_sup_apply fun i hi ↦
(hs i hi).continuousAt
lemma Continuous.finset_sup (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (s.sup f) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_sup fun i hi ↦ (hs i hi).continuousAt
end FinsetSup
section FinsetInf'
variable {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeInf L] [ContinuousInf L] {s : Finset ι}
{f : ι → X → L} {t : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_inf'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ s.inf' hne (f · a)) x :=
Tendsto.finset_inf'_nhds_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_inf' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (s.inf' hne f) x := by
simpa only [← Finset.inf'_apply] using finset_inf'_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ s.inf' hne (f · a)) t x :=
Tendsto.finset_inf'_nhds_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf' (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) : ContinuousWithinAt (s.inf' hne f) t x := by
simpa only [← Finset.inf'_apply] using finset_inf'_apply hne hs
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_inf'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ s.inf' hne (f · a)) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf'_apply hne fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_inf' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (s.inf' hne f) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf' hne fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
lemma Continuous.finset_inf'_apply (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) :
Continuous (fun a ↦ s.inf' hne (f · a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_inf'_apply _ fun i hi ↦
(hs i hi).continuousAt
lemma Continuous.finset_inf' (hne : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Continuous (f i)) :
Continuous (s.inf' hne f) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ ContinuousAt.finset_inf' _ fun i hi ↦ (hs i hi).continuousAt
end FinsetInf'
section FinsetInf
variable {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeInf L] [OrderTop L] [ContinuousInf L] {s : Finset ι}
{f : ι → X → L} {t : Set X} {x : X}
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_inf_apply (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ s.inf (f · a)) x :=
Tendsto.finset_inf_nhds_apply hs
lemma ContinuousAt.finset_inf (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousAt (f i) x) :
ContinuousAt (s.inf f) x := by
simpa only [← Finset.inf_apply] using finset_inf_apply hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf_apply
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun a ↦ s.inf (f · a)) t x :=
Tendsto.finset_inf_nhds_apply hs
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousWithinAt (f i) t x) : ContinuousWithinAt (s.inf f) t x := by
simpa only [← Finset.inf_apply] using finset_inf_apply hs
lemma ContinuousOn.finset_inf_apply (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ s.inf (f · a)) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf_apply fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
| lemma ContinuousOn.finset_inf (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, ContinuousOn (f i) t) :
ContinuousOn (s.inf f) t := fun x hx ↦
ContinuousWithinAt.finset_inf fun i hi ↦ hs i hi x hx
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Lattice.lean | 383 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
theorem degrees_add_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem degrees_sum_le {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
theorem degrees_mul_le {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
theorem degrees_prod_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
theorem degrees_pow_le {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod_le (s := .range n) (f := fun _ ↦ p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_add := degrees_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sum := degrees_sum_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_mul := degrees_mul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_prod := degrees_prod_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_pow := degrees_pow_le
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
theorem le_degrees_add_left (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
| all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias le_degrees_add := le_degrees_add_left
lemma le_degrees_add_right (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : q.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
simpa [add_comm] using le_degrees_add_left h.symm
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) :
(p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees :=
degrees_add_le.antisymm <| Multiset.union_le (le_degrees_add_left h) (le_degrees_add_right h)
lemma degrees_map_le [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S} : (map f p).degrees ≤ p.degrees := by
classical exact Finset.sup_mono <| support_map_subset ..
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_map := degrees_map_le
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 159 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex Kontorovich and Heather Macbeth and Marc Masdeu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth, Marc Masdeu
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ZMultiples
/-!
# The action of the modular group SL(2, ℤ) on the upper half-plane
We define the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ` (via restriction of the `SL(2,ℝ)` action in
`Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane`). We then define the standard fundamental domain
(`ModularGroup.fd`, `𝒟`) for this action and show
(`ModularGroup.exists_smul_mem_fd`) that any point in `ℍ` can be
moved inside `𝒟`.
## Main definitions
The standard (closed) fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟`:
`fd := {z | 1 ≤ (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| ≤ (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
The standard open fundamental domain of the action of `SL(2,ℤ)` on `ℍ`, denoted `𝒟ᵒ`:
`fdo := {z | 1 < (z : ℂ).normSq ∧ |z.re| < (1 : ℝ) / 2}`
These notations are localized in the `Modular` locale and can be enabled via `open scoped Modular`.
## Main results
Any `z : ℍ` can be moved to `𝒟` by an element of `SL(2,ℤ)`:
`exists_smul_mem_fd (z : ℍ) : ∃ g : SL(2,ℤ), g • z ∈ 𝒟`
If both `z` and `γ • z` are in the open domain `𝒟ᵒ` then `z = γ • z`:
`eq_smul_self_of_mem_fdo_mem_fdo {z : ℍ} {g : SL(2,ℤ)} (hz : z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) (hg : g • z ∈ 𝒟ᵒ) : z = g • z`
# Discussion
Standard proofs make use of the identity
`g • z = a / c - 1 / (c (cz + d))`
for `g = [[a, b], [c, d]]` in `SL(2)`, but this requires separate handling of whether `c = 0`.
Instead, our proof makes use of the following perhaps novel identity (see
`ModularGroup.smul_eq_lcRow0_add`):
`g • z = (a c + b d) / (c^2 + d^2) + (d z - c) / ((c^2 + d^2) (c z + d))`
where there is no issue of division by zero.
Another feature is that we delay until the very end the consideration of special matrices
`T=[[1,1],[0,1]]` (see `ModularGroup.T`) and `S=[[0,-1],[1,0]]` (see `ModularGroup.S`), by
instead using abstract theory on the properness of certain maps (phrased in terms of the filters
`Filter.cocompact`, `Filter.cofinite`, etc) to deduce existence theorems, first to prove the
existence of `g` maximizing `(g•z).im` (see `ModularGroup.exists_max_im`), and then among
those, to minimize `|(g•z).re|` (see `ModularGroup.exists_row_one_eq_and_min_re`).
-/
open Complex hiding abs_two
open Matrix hiding mul_smul
open Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup UpperHalfPlane ModularGroup Topology
noncomputable section
open scoped ComplexConjugate MatrixGroups
namespace ModularGroup
variable {g : SL(2, ℤ)} (z : ℍ)
section BottomRow
/-- The two numbers `c`, `d` in the "bottom_row" of `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]` in `SL(2, ℤ)` are coprime. -/
theorem bottom_row_coprime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (g : SL(2, R)) :
IsCoprime ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 0) ((↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1 1) := by
use -(↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 1, (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 0 0
rw [add_comm, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← det_fin_two]
exact g.det_coe
/-- Every pair `![c, d]` of coprime integers is the "bottom_row" of some element `g=[[*,*],[c,d]]`
of `SL(2,ℤ)`. -/
theorem bottom_row_surj {R : Type*} [CommRing R] :
Set.SurjOn (fun g : SL(2, R) => (↑g : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) 1) Set.univ
{cd | IsCoprime (cd 0) (cd 1)} := by
rintro cd ⟨b₀, a, gcd_eqn⟩
let A := of ![![a, -b₀], cd]
have det_A_1 : det A = 1 := by
| convert gcd_eqn
rw [det_fin_two]
simp [A, (by ring : a * cd 1 + b₀ * cd 0 = b₀ * cd 0 + a * cd 1)]
refine ⟨⟨A, det_A_1⟩, Set.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
ext; simp [A]
end BottomRow
section TendstoLemmas
open Filter ContinuousLinearMap
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Modular.lean | 94 | 104 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.