Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Graded.External
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
/-!
# Graded tensor products over graded algebras
The graded tensor product $A \hat\otimes_R B$ is imbued with a multiplication defined on homogeneous
tensors by:
$$(a \otimes b) \cdot (a' \otimes b') = (-1)^{\deg a' \deg b} (a \cdot a') \otimes (b \cdot b')$$
where $A$ and $B$ are algebras graded by `ℕ`, `ℤ`, or `ι` (or more generally, any index
that satisfies `Module ι (Additive ℤˣ)`).
## Main results
* `GradedTensorProduct R 𝒜 ℬ`: for families of submodules of `A` and `B` that form a graded algebra,
this is a type alias for `A ⊗[R] B` with the appropriate multiplication.
* `GradedTensorProduct.instAlgebra`: the ring structure induced by this multiplication.
* `GradedTensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for graded tensor products
## Notation
* `𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ` is notation for `GradedTensorProduct R 𝒜 ℬ`.
* `a ᵍ⊗ₜ b` is notation for `GradedTensorProduct.tmul _ a b`.
## References
* https://math.stackexchange.com/q/202718/1896
* [*Algebra I*, Bourbaki : Chapter III, §4.7, example (2)][bourbaki1989]
## Implementation notes
We cannot put the multiplication on `A ⊗[R] B` directly as it would conflict with the existing
multiplication defined without the $(-1)^{\deg a' \deg b}$ term. Furthermore, the ring `A` may not
have a unique graduation, and so we need the chosen graduation `𝒜` to appear explicitly in the
type.
## TODO
* Show that the tensor product of graded algebras is itself a graded algebra.
* Determine if replacing the synonym with a single-field structure improves performance.
-/
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
variable {R ι A B : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring ι] [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) (ℬ : ι → Submodule R B)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜] [GradedAlgebra ℬ]
open DirectSum
variable (R) in
/-- A Type synonym for `A ⊗[R] B`, but with multiplication as `TensorProduct.gradedMul`.
This has notation `𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def GradedTensorProduct
(𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) (ℬ : ι → Submodule R B)
[GradedAlgebra 𝒜] [GradedAlgebra ℬ] :
Type _ :=
A ⊗[R] B
namespace GradedTensorProduct
open TensorProduct
@[inherit_doc GradedTensorProduct]
scoped[TensorProduct] notation:100 𝒜 " ᵍ⊗[" R "] " ℬ:100 => GradedTensorProduct R 𝒜 ℬ
instance instAddCommGroupWithOne : AddCommGroupWithOne (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) :=
Algebra.TensorProduct.instAddCommGroupWithOne
instance : Module R (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) := TensorProduct.leftModule
variable (R) in
/-- The casting equivalence to move between regular and graded tensor products. -/
def of : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₗ[R] 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ := LinearEquiv.refl _ _
@[simp]
theorem of_one : of R 𝒜 ℬ 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_symm_one : (of R 𝒜 ℬ).symm 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_symm_of (x : A ⊗[R] B) : (of R 𝒜 ℬ).symm (of R 𝒜 ℬ x) = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_of_of (x : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) : of R 𝒜 ℬ ((of R 𝒜 ℬ).symm x) = x := rfl
/-- Two linear maps from the graded tensor product agree if they agree on the underlying tensor
product. -/
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {M} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] ⦃f g : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ →ₗ[R] M⦄
(h : f ∘ₗ of R 𝒜 ℬ = (g ∘ₗ of R 𝒜 ℬ : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] M)) :
f = g :=
h
variable (R) {𝒜 ℬ} in
/-- The graded tensor product of two elements of graded rings. -/
abbrev tmul (a : A) (b : B) : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ := of R 𝒜 ℬ (a ⊗ₜ b)
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 x " ᵍ⊗ₜ" y:100 => tmul _ x y
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 x " ᵍ⊗ₜ[" R "] " y:100 => tmul R x y
variable (R) in
/-- An auxiliary construction to move between the graded tensor product of internally-graded objects
and the tensor product of direct sums. -/
noncomputable def auxEquiv : (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) ≃ₗ[R] (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) ⊗[R] (⨁ i, ℬ i) :=
let fA := (decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).toLinearEquiv
let fB := (decomposeAlgEquiv ℬ).toLinearEquiv
(of R 𝒜 ℬ).symm.trans (TensorProduct.congr fA fB)
theorem auxEquiv_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ (a ᵍ⊗ₜ b) = decompose 𝒜 a ⊗ₜ decompose ℬ b := rfl
theorem auxEquiv_one : auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ 1 = 1 := by
rw [← of_one, Algebra.TensorProduct.one_def, auxEquiv_tmul 𝒜 ℬ, DirectSum.decompose_one,
DirectSum.decompose_one, Algebra.TensorProduct.one_def]
theorem auxEquiv_symm_one : (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ).symm 1 = 1 :=
(LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq _).mpr (auxEquiv_one _ _).symm
variable [Module ι (Additive ℤˣ)]
/-- Auxiliary construction used to build the `Mul` instance and get distributivity of `+` and
`\smul`. -/
noncomputable def mulHom : (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) →ₗ[R] (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) →ₗ[R] (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) := by
letI fAB1 := auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ
have := ((gradedMul R (𝒜 ·) (ℬ ·)).compl₁₂ fAB1.toLinearMap fAB1.toLinearMap).compr₂
fAB1.symm.toLinearMap
exact this
theorem mulHom_apply (x y : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) :
mulHom 𝒜 ℬ x y
= (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ).symm (gradedMul R (𝒜 ·) (ℬ ·) (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ x) (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ y)) :=
rfl
/-- The multiplication on the graded tensor product.
See `GradedTensorProduct.coe_mul_coe` for a characterization on pure tensors. -/
instance : Mul (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) where mul x y := mulHom 𝒜 ℬ x y
theorem mul_def (x y : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) : x * y = mulHom 𝒜 ℬ x y := rfl
-- Before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 this was `@[simp]` but it times out when we try to apply it.
theorem auxEquiv_mul (x y : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) :
auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ (x * y) = gradedMul R (𝒜 ·) (ℬ ·) (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ x) (auxEquiv R 𝒜 ℬ y) :=
LinearEquiv.eq_symm_apply _ |>.mp rfl
instance instMonoid : Monoid (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) where
mul_one x := by
rw [mul_def, mulHom_apply, auxEquiv_one, gradedMul_one, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
one_mul x := by
rw [mul_def, mulHom_apply, auxEquiv_one, one_gradedMul, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
mul_assoc x y z := by
simp_rw [mul_def, mulHom_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
rw [gradedMul_assoc]
instance instRing : Ring (𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) where
__ := instAddCommGroupWithOne 𝒜 ℬ
__ := instMonoid 𝒜 ℬ
right_distrib x y z := by simp_rw [mul_def, LinearMap.map_add₂]
left_distrib x y z := by simp_rw [mul_def, map_add]
mul_zero x := by simp_rw [mul_def, map_zero]
zero_mul x := by simp_rw [mul_def, LinearMap.map_zero₂]
/-- The characterization of this multiplication on partially homogeneous elements. -/
theorem tmul_coe_mul_coe_tmul {j₁ i₂ : ι} (a₁ : A) (b₁ : ℬ j₁) (a₂ : 𝒜 i₂) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ : B) * (a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) =
(-1 : ℤˣ)^(j₁ * i₂) • ((a₁ * a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂ : B)) := by
dsimp only [mul_def, mulHom_apply, of_symm_of]
dsimp [auxEquiv, tmul]
rw [decompose_coe, decompose_coe]
simp_rw [← lof_eq_of R]
rw [tmul_of_gradedMul_of_tmul]
simp_rw [lof_eq_of R]
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to specialize `map_smul` to `LinearEquiv.map_smul`
rw [@Units.smul_def _ _ (_) (_), ← Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul R, LinearEquiv.map_smul, map_smul,
Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul R, ← @Units.smul_def _ _ (_) (_)]
rw [congr_symm_tmul]
dsimp
simp_rw [decompose_symm_mul, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- A special case for when `b₁` has grade 0. -/
theorem tmul_zero_coe_mul_coe_tmul {i₂ : ι} (a₁ : A) (b₁ : ℬ 0) (a₂ : 𝒜 i₂) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ : B) * (a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) =
((a₁ * a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂ : B)) := by
rw [tmul_coe_mul_coe_tmul, zero_mul, uzpow_zero, one_smul]
/-- A special case for when `a₂` has grade 0. -/
theorem tmul_coe_mul_zero_coe_tmul {j₁ : ι} (a₁ : A) (b₁ : ℬ j₁) (a₂ : 𝒜 0) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ : B) * (a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) =
((a₁ * a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂ : B)) := by
rw [tmul_coe_mul_coe_tmul, mul_zero, uzpow_zero, one_smul]
theorem tmul_one_mul_coe_tmul {i₂ : ι} (a₁ : A) (a₂ : 𝒜 i₂) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B) * (a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) = (a₁ * a₂ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₂ : B) := by
convert tmul_zero_coe_mul_coe_tmul 𝒜 ℬ a₁ (@GradedMonoid.GOne.one _ (ℬ ·) _ _) a₂ b₂
rw [SetLike.coe_gOne, one_mul]
theorem tmul_coe_mul_one_tmul {j₁ : ι} (a₁ : A) (b₁ : ℬ j₁) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ : B) * (1 : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) = (a₁ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂ : B) := by
convert tmul_coe_mul_zero_coe_tmul 𝒜 ℬ a₁ b₁ (@GradedMonoid.GOne.one _ (𝒜 ·) _ _) b₂
rw [SetLike.coe_gOne, mul_one]
theorem tmul_one_mul_one_tmul (a₁ : A) (b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B) * (1 : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ : 𝒜 ᵍ⊗[R] ℬ) = (a₁ : A) ᵍ⊗ₜ (b₂ : B) := by
| convert tmul_coe_mul_zero_coe_tmul 𝒜 ℬ
a₁ (GradedMonoid.GOne.one (A := (ℬ ·))) (GradedMonoid.GOne.one (A := (𝒜 ·))) b₂
· rw [SetLike.coe_gOne, mul_one]
· rw [SetLike.coe_gOne, one_mul]
/-- The ring morphism `A →+* A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Graded/Internal.lean | 222 | 227 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
variable {K}
lemma den_mem_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(algebraMap R₁ K) (I.den : R₁) ∈ I⁻¹ := by
rw [mem_inv_iff hI]
intro i hi
rw [← Algebra.smul_def (I.den : R₁) i, ← mem_coe, coe_one]
suffices Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) I.num ≤ 1 from
this <| (den_mul_self_eq_num I).symm ▸ smul_mem_pointwise_smul i I.den I.coeToSubmodule hi
apply le_trans <| map_mono (show I.num ≤ 1 by simp only [Ideal.one_eq_top, le_top, bot_eq_zero])
rw [Ideal.one_eq_top, Submodule.map_top, one_eq_range]
lemma num_le_mul_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I.num ≤ I * I⁻¹ := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, num_zero_eq <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K, zero_mul, zero_eq_bot,
coeIdeal_bot]
· rw [mul_comm, ← den_mul_self_eq_num']
exact mul_right_mono I <| spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.2 (den_mem_inv hI)
lemma bot_lt_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < I * I⁻¹ :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (coeIdeal_ne_zero.2 (hI ∘ num_eq_zero_iff.1)).bot_lt I.num_le_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : IsIdempotentElem I := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, adjoinIntegral_coe, I]
rw [(Algebra.adjoin A {x}).isIdempotentElem_toSubmodule]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
include h
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
((P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) this
_ = M := ?_
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne,
one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
· rw [← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul]
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebraMap _ _ y` for some `y`.
intro x hx
have le_one : (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ 1 := by
rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A)).mpr hM.le)
obtain ⟨y, _hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp (le_one hx)
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt hM
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := mul_mem_mul (mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal A⁰).mp zy_mem
rw [IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A) zy_eq] at hzy
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ (Or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)⟩
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`IsDedekindDomainInv` and `IsDedekindDomain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain : IsDedekindDomain A :=
{ h.isNoetherianRing, h.dimensionLEOne, h.integrallyClosed with }
end IsDedekindDomainInv
end IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable {A K}
theorem one_mem_inv_coe_ideal [IsDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI)]
intro y hy
rw [one_mul]
exact FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_le_one hy
/-- Specialization of `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : Ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
theorem exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [IsDedekindDomain A] (hNF : ¬IsField A)
{I M : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.IsMaximal] :
∃ Z : Multiset (PrimeSpectrum A),
(M ::ₘ Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧
¬Multiset.prod (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal) ≤ I := by
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := PrimeSpectrum.exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ :=
wellFounded_lt.has_min
{Z | (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥}
⟨Z₀, hZ₀.1, hZ₀.2⟩
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := hM.isPrime.multiset_prod_le.mp (hZI.trans hIM)
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ'
classical
have := Multiset.map_erase PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal (fun _ _ => PrimeSpectrum.ext) P Z
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.asIdeal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥ := by
rwa [Ne, ← Multiset.cons_erase hPZ', Multiset.prod_cons, Ideal.mul_eq_bot, not_or, ←
this] at hprodZ
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (P.isPrime.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM
subst hPM'
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert hZI
rw [this, Multiset.cons_erase hPZ']
· refine fun h => h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, ?_⟩ (Multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ)
exact hZP0
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
lemma not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A}
(hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ¬(I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) ≤ 1 := by
have hNF : ¬IsField A := fun h ↦ letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).elim hI0 hI1
wlog hM : I.IsMaximal generalizing I
· rcases I.exists_le_maximal hI1 with ⟨M, hmax, hIM⟩
have hMbot : M ≠ ⊥ := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne'
refine mt (le_trans <| inv_anti_mono ?_ ?_ ?_) (this hMbot hmax.ne_top hmax) <;>
simpa only [coeIdeal_ne_zero, coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal]
have hI0 : ⊥ < I := I.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF
obtain ⟨⟨a, haI⟩, ha0⟩ := Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt hI0
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0
let J : Ideal A := Ideal.span {a}
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0
have hJI : J ≤ I := I.span_singleton_le_iff_mem.2 haI
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJI
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := SetLike.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle
have hnz_fa : algebraMap A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) a) ha0
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine Set.not_subset.2 ⟨algebraMap A K b * (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff ?_).mpr ?_, ?_⟩
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0.ne'
· rintro y₀ hy₀
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy₀
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J := by
apply hle
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at h_yb
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hnz_fa, mul_one]
apply coe_mem_one
· refine mt (mem_one_iff _).mp ?_
rintro ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← RingHom.map_mul] at h₂_abs
have := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', IsFractionRing.injective A K h₂_abs⟩
contradiction
theorem exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x ∉ (1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :=
Set.not_subset.1 <| not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot hI0 hI1
theorem mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI : (I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1) : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ J : Ideal A, (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) = I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp mul_one_div_le_one
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥
· subst hJ0
refine absurd ?_ hI0
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K, hJ]
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤
· rw [← hJ, hJ1, coeIdeal_top]
exact (not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot (K := K) hJ0 hJ1 (hJ ▸ hI)).elim
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
theorem coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : IsDedekindDomain A] (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0
by_cases hJ0 : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0
· rw [hJ0, inv_zero']; exact zero_le _
intro x hx
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices x ∈ integralClosure A K by
rwa [IsIntegrallyClosed.integralClosure_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range,
← mem_one_iff] at this
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw [mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg]
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
intro b hb
rw [mem_inv_iff (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0)]
dsimp only at hx
rw [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ0] at hx
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at hx ⊢
intro y hy
exact hx _ (mul_mem_mul hy hb)
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : A[X]` works.
refine ⟨AlgHom.range (Polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
isNoetherian_submodule.mp (isNoetherian (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) _ fun y hy => ?_,
⟨Polynomial.X, Polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (AlgHom.mem_range _).mp hy
rw [Polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ?_
clear hi
induction' i with i ih
· rw [pow_zero]; exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0
· show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)
rw [pow_succ']; exact x_mul_mem _ ih
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : Ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
suffices h₂ : I * (spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) = 1 by
rw [mul_inv_cancel_iff]
exact ⟨spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹, h₂⟩
subst hJ
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
· exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap A K)).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) _) ha
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne)
theorem mul_right_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' := by
intro I I'
constructor
· intro h
convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h <;> dsimp only <;>
rw [mul_assoc, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
· exact fun h => mul_right_mono J h
theorem mul_left_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} :
J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' := by convert mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
theorem mul_right_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (· * I) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm
theorem mul_left_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (I * ·) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm
/-- This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem div_eq_mul_inv [IsDedekindDomain A] (I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero]
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp ?_) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr ?_)
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le]
intro x hx y hy
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx
exact hx y hy
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
end FractionalIdeal
/-- `IsDedekindDomain` and `IsDedekindDomainInv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv [IsDomain A] :
IsDedekindDomain A ↔ IsDedekindDomainInv A :=
⟨fun _h _I hI => FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hI, fun h => h.isDedekindDomain⟩
end Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
#adaptation_note /-- 2025-03-29 for lean4#7717 had to add `mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero` field.
TODO(kmill) There is trouble calculating the type of the `IsLeftCancelMulZero` parent. -/
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`FractionalIdeal.semifield`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := mul_left_cancel₀
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel₀ hI']
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h)
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hI', one_mul]⟩
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wf := by
have : WellFoundedGT (Ideal A) := inferInstance
convert this.wf
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_isUnit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_isUnit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_intro x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) := .ofUniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`. -/
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_inj_of_not_isUnit (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top) hP).mp i.succ_ne_self)
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
/-- Strengthening of `IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hy
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x _ hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
section Gcd
namespace Ideal
/-! ### GCD and LCM of ideals in a Dedekind domain
We show that the gcd of two ideals in a Dedekind domain is just their supremum,
and the lcm is their infimum, and use this to instantiate `NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_inf (I J : Ideal A) : (I ⊔ J) * (I ⊓ J) = I * J := by
letI := UniqueFactorizationMonoid.toNormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)
have hgcd : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [gcd_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [dvd_iff_le, sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _⟩
· rw [dvd_gcd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
have hlcm : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := by
rw [lcm_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
· rw [dvd_iff_le, le_inf_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩
rw [← hgcd, ← hlcm, associated_iff_eq.mp (gcd_mul_lcm _ _)]
/-- Ideals in a Dedekind domain have gcd and lcm operators that (trivially) are compatible with
the normalization operator. -/
instance : NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ Ideal.normalizationMonoid with
gcd := (· ⊔ ·)
gcd_dvd_left := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_left
gcd_dvd_right := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_right
dvd_gcd := by
simp only [dvd_iff_le]
exact fun h1 h2 => @sup_le (Ideal A) _ _ _ _ h1 h2
lcm := (· ⊓ ·)
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq]
lcm_zero_right := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq]
gcd_mul_lcm := fun _ _ => by rw [associated_iff_eq, sup_mul_inf]
normalize_gcd := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _
normalize_lcm := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _ }
-- In fact, any lawful gcd and lcm would equal sup and inf respectively.
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_sup (I J : Ideal A) : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_inf (I J : Ideal A) : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := rfl
theorem isCoprime_iff_gcd {I J : Ideal A} : IsCoprime I J ↔ gcd I J = 1 := by
rw [Ideal.isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, one_eq_top, gcd_eq_sup]
theorem factors_span_eq {p : K[X]} : factors (span {p}) = (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp; · simpa [Set.singleton_zero] using normalizedFactors_zero
have : ∀ q ∈ (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}), Prime q := fun q hq ↦ by
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hq
exact prime_span_singleton_iff.mpr <| prime_of_factor r hr
rw [← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr (factors_prod hp), ← multiset_prod_span_singleton,
factors_eq_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime this]
end Ideal
end Gcd
end IsDedekindDomain
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] [IsDedekindDomain T] {I J : Ideal T}
open Multiset UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
theorem prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : (normalizedFactors I).prod = I :=
associated_iff_eq.1 (prod_normalizedFactors hI)
theorem count_le_of_ideal_ge [DecidableEq (Ideal T)]
{I J : Ideal T} (h : I ≤ J) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (K : Ideal T) :
count K (normalizedFactors J) ≤ count K (normalizedFactors I) :=
le_iff_count.1 ((dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI h) hI).1
(dvd_iff_le.2 h))
_
theorem sup_eq_prod_inf_factors [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
I ⊔ J = (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod := by
have H : normalizedFactors (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod =
normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J := by
apply normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime
intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
have := Multiset.prod_ne_zero_of_prime (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J) fun _ h =>
prime_of_normalized_factor _ (Multiset.mem_inter.1 h).1
apply le_antisymm
· rw [sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
constructor
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hI, H]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hJ, H]
exact inf_le_right
· rw [← dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors,
normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime, le_iff_count]
· intro a
rw [Multiset.count_inter]
exact le_min (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_left hI a) (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_right hJ a)
· intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
· exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI le_sup_left
· exact this
theorem irreducible_pow_sup [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ min ((normalizedFactors I).count J) n := by
rw [sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (pow_ne_zero n hJ.ne_zero) hI, min_comm,
normalizedFactors_of_irreducible_pow hJ, normalize_eq J, replicate_inter, prod_replicate]
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_le (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≤ emultiplicity J I) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ n := by
classical
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· simp_all
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_right]
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J] at hn
exact_mod_cast hn
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ)
(hn : emultiplicity J I ≤ n) : J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ multiplicity J I := by
classical
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_left]
· congr
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), ← FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J]
rw [← emultiplicity_lt_top]
apply hn.trans_lt
simp
· rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J] at hn
exact_mod_cast hn
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_mul_coprime [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] {I : Ideal T} (hI : I ≠ ⊥)
(P : Ideal T) [hpm : P.IsMaximal] :
∃ Q : Ideal T, P ⊔ Q = ⊤ ∧ I = P ^ (Multiset.count P (normalizedFactors I)) * Q := by
use (filter (¬ P = ·) (normalizedFactors I)).prod
constructor
· refine P.sup_multiset_prod_eq_top (fun p hpi ↦ ?_)
have hp : Prime p := prime_of_normalized_factor p (filter_subset _ (normalizedFactors I) hpi)
exact hpm.coprime_of_ne ((isPrime_of_prime hp).isMaximal hp.ne_zero) (of_mem_filter hpi)
· nth_rw 1 [← prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self hI, ← filter_add_not (P = ·) (normalizedFactors I)]
rw [prod_add, pow_count]
end IsDedekindDomain
/-!
### Height one spectrum of a Dedekind domain
If `R` is a Dedekind domain of Krull dimension 1, the maximal ideals of `R` are exactly its nonzero
prime ideals.
We define `HeightOneSpectrum` and provide lemmas to recover the facts that prime ideals of height
one are prime and irreducible.
-/
namespace IsDedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
/-- The height one prime spectrum of a Dedekind domain `R` is the type of nonzero prime ideals of
`R`. Note that this equals the maximal spectrum if `R` has Krull dimension 1. -/
@[ext, nolint unusedArguments]
structure HeightOneSpectrum where
asIdeal : Ideal R
isPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
ne_bot : asIdeal ≠ ⊥
attribute [instance] HeightOneSpectrum.isPrime
variable (v : HeightOneSpectrum R) {R}
namespace HeightOneSpectrum
instance isMaximal : v.asIdeal.IsMaximal := v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot
theorem prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
theorem irreducible : Irreducible v.asIdeal :=
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.irreducible_iff_prime.mpr v.prime
theorem associates_irreducible : Irreducible <| Associates.mk v.asIdeal :=
Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
/-- An equivalence between the height one and maximal spectra for rings of Krull dimension 1. -/
def equivMaximalSpectrum (hR : ¬IsField R) : HeightOneSpectrum R ≃ MaximalSpectrum R where
toFun v := ⟨v.asIdeal, v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot⟩
invFun v :=
⟨v.asIdeal, v.isMaximal.isPrime, Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField v.isMaximal hR⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
variable (R)
/-- A Dedekind domain is equal to the intersection of its localizations at all its height one
non-zero prime ideals viewed as subalgebras of its field of fractions. -/
theorem iInf_localization_eq_bot [Algebra R K] [hK : IsFractionRing R K] :
(⨅ v : HeightOneSpectrum R,
Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ v.asIdeal.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) = ⊥ := by
ext x
rw [Algebra.mem_iInf]
constructor
on_goal 1 => by_cases hR : IsField R
· rcases Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mp
(IsField.localization_map_bijective (Rₘ := K) (flip nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero rfl : 0 ∉ R⁰) hR)
with ⟨algebra_map_inv, _, algebra_map_right_inv⟩
exact fun _ => Algebra.mem_bot.mpr ⟨algebra_map_inv x, algebra_map_right_inv x⟩
all_goals rw [← MaximalSpectrum.iInf_localization_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_iInf]
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv⟩ => hx ((equivMaximalSpectrum hR).symm ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv, hbot⟩ => hx ⟨v, hv.isMaximal hbot⟩
end HeightOneSpectrum
end IsDedekindDomain
section
open Ideal
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal R} {J : Ideal A}
/-- The map from ideals of `R` dividing `I` to the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
a homomorphism `f : R/I →+* A/J` -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: use `Subtype` instead of `Set` to make linter happy
def idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{p : Ideal R // p ∣ I} →o {p : Ideal A // p ∣ J} where
toFun X := ⟨comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)), by
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) ≤
comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)) :=
ker_le_comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
rw [mk_ker] at this
exact dvd_iff_le.mpr this⟩
monotone' := by
rintro ⟨X, hX⟩ ⟨Y, hY⟩ h
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at h ⊢
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, map_le_iff_le_comap, Subtype.coe_mk,
comap_map_of_surjective _ hf (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y)]
suffices map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X ≤ map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y by
exact le_sup_of_le_left this
rwa [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, ← RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr <| le_of_dvd hY]
@[simp]
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id :
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (RingHom.id (A ⧸ J)).surjective = OrderHom.id :=
OrderHom.ext _ _
(funext fun X => by
simp only [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, map_id, OrderHom.coe_mk, OrderHom.id_coe, id,
comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, ←
RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot (Ideal.Quotient.mk J), mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr (dvd_iff_le.mp X.prop), Subtype.coe_eta])
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] {L : Ideal B}
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} {g : A ⧸ J →+* B ⧸ L}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
(idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hg).comp (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hf) =
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (show Function.Surjective (g.comp f) from hg.comp hf) := by
refine OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun x => ?_)
rw [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.comp_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk,
OrderHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, map_comap_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, map_map]
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (f : R ⧸ I ≃+* A ⧸ J)
/-- The bijection between ideals of `R` dividing `I` and the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
an isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
def idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I } ≃o { p : Ideal A | p ∣ J } := by
have f_surj : Function.Surjective (f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J) := f.surjective
have fsym_surj : Function.Surjective (f.symm : A ⧸ J →+* R ⧸ I) := f.symm.surjective
refine OrderIso.ofHomInv (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom f_surj) (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom fsym_surj)
?_ ?_
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp fsym_surj f_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.comp_symm, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp f_surj fsym_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.symm_comp, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm = idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm := rfl
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso {L M : Ideal R} (hL : L ∣ I) (hM : M ∣ I) :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ : Ideal A) ∣ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ↔
L ∣ M := by
suffices
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ≤ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ ↔
(⟨M, hM⟩ : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I }) ≤ ⟨L, hL⟩
by rw [dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le, Subtype.coe_le_coe, this, Subtype.mk_le_mk]
exact (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).le_iff_le
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
{L : Ideal R} (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
↑(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hL⟩)
∈ normalizedFactors J := by
have hI : I ≠ ⊥ := by
intro hI
rw [hI, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero, ← Multiset.empty_eq_zero] at hL
exact Finset.not_mem_empty _ hL
refine mem_normalizedFactors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
rintro ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f
/-- The bijection between the sets of normalized factors of I and J induced by a ring
isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
def normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
{ L : Ideal R | L ∈ normalizedFactors I } ≃ { M : Ideal A | M ∈ normalizedFactors J } where
toFun j :=
⟨idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩,
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f hJ j.prop⟩
invFun j :=
⟨(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩, by
rw [idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm]
exact
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f.symm hI
j.prop⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp [-Set.coe_setOf]
@[simp]
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ).symm =
normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm hJ hI := rfl
/-- The map `normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv` preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
(L : Ideal R) (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
emultiplicity (↑(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ ⟨L, hL⟩)) J = emultiplicity L I := by
rw [normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine emultiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_eq_emultiplicity_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
exact fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩ => idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f hl hl'
end
section ChineseRemainder
open Ideal UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable {R}
theorem Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq [Ring.DimensionLEOne R] {P Q : Ideal R}
[hP : P.IsPrime] [hQ : Q.IsPrime] (hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) : P ≤ Q ↔ P = Q :=
⟨(hP.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hQ.ne_top, Eq.le⟩
theorem Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge {I J : Ideal R} (h : ∀ P, I ≤ P → J ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) :
IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
by_contra hIJ
obtain ⟨P, hP, hIJ⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_maximal _ hIJ
exact h P (le_trans le_sup_left hIJ) (le_trans le_sup_right hIJ) hP.isPrime
section DedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ∨ b ∈ I ^ n := by
cases n; · simp
by_cases hI0 : I = ⊥; · simpa [pow_succ, hI0] using h
simp only [← Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at h ⊢
by_cases ha : I ∣ span {a}
· exact Or.inl ha
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact Or.inr (Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ((Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime hI0).mpr hI) _ ha h)
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mem_pow_mul (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ^ n ∨ b ∈ I := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
rw [or_comm]
exact Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow _ h
section
theorem Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq {p x : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (hle : x ≤ p ^ n)
[DecidableEq (Ideal R)] (hlt : ¬x ≤ p ^ (n + 1)) : (normalizedFactors x).count p = n :=
count_normalizedFactors_eq' ((Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime.mp hp).imp_right Prime.irreducible)
(normalize_eq _) (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr hle) (mt Ideal.le_of_dvd hlt)
/-- The number of times an ideal `I` occurs as normalized factor of another ideal `J` is stable
when regarding these ideals as associated elements of the monoid of ideals. -/
theorem count_associates_factors_eq [DecidableEq (Ideal R)] [DecidableEq <| Associates (Ideal R)]
[∀ (p : Associates <| Ideal R), Decidable (Irreducible p)]
{I J : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J.IsPrime) (hJ₀ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(Associates.mk J).count (Associates.mk I).factors = Multiset.count J (normalizedFactors I) := by
replace hI : Associates.mk I ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
have hJ' : Irreducible (Associates.mk J) := by
simpa only [Associates.irreducible_mk] using (Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hJ₀ hJ).irreducible
apply (Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq (p := J) (x := I) _ _).symm
all_goals
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, ← Associates.mk_dvd_mk, Associates.mk_pow]
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le]
rw [Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le hI hJ']
omega
end
theorem Ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors {I J K : Ideal R}
(coprime : ∀ P, J ≤ P → K ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) (hJ : I ≤ J) (hK : I ≤ K) : I ≤ J * K := by
simp only [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le] at coprime hJ hK ⊢
by_cases hJ0 : J = 0
· simpa only [hJ0, zero_mul] using hJ
obtain ⟨I', rfl⟩ := hK
rw [mul_comm]
refine mul_dvd_mul_left K
(UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors (b := K) hJ0 ?_ hJ)
exact fun hPJ hPK => mt Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (coprime _ hPJ hPK)
/-- The intersection of distinct prime powers in a Dedekind domain is the product of these
prime powers. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R)
(e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (f i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → f i ≠ f j) :
(s.inf fun i => f i ^ e i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ e i := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
revert prime coprime
refine s.induction ?_ ?_
· simp
intro a s ha ih prime coprime
specialize
ih (fun i hi => prime i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi j hj =>
coprime i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
rw [Finset.inf_insert, Finset.prod_insert ha, ih]
refine le_antisymm (Ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors ?_ inf_le_left inf_le_right) Ideal.mul_le_inf
intro P hPa hPs hPp
obtain ⟨b, hb, hPb⟩ := hPp.prod_le.mp hPs
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s))
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb))
refine coprime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s) b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb) ?_ ?_
· exact (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha).symm
· refine ((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq ?_).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPa)).trans
((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq ?_).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPb)).symm
· exact (prime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s)).ne_zero
· exact (prime b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)).ne_zero
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: if the ideal `I` factors as
`∏ i, P i ^ e i`, then `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`. -/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (I : Ideal R)
(P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i, Prime (P i))
(coprime : Pairwise fun i j => P i ≠ P j)
(prod_eq : ∏ i, P i ^ e i = I) : R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ i, R ⧸ P i ^ e i :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq
(by
simp only [← prod_eq, Finset.inf_eq_iInf, Finset.mem_univ, ciInf_pos,
← IsDedekindDomain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod _ _ _ (fun i _ => prime i)
(coprime.set_pairwise _)])).trans <|
Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient _ fun i j hij => Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge <| by
intro P hPi hPj hPp
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime i)
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime j)
exact coprime hij <| ((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime i).ne_zero).mp
(hPp.le_of_pow_le hPi)).trans <| Eq.symm <|
(Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime j).ne_zero).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPj)
open scoped Classical in
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`,
where `P i` ranges over the prime factors of `I` and `e i` over the multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ P : (factors I).toFinset, R ⧸ (P : Ideal R) ^ (Multiset.count ↑P (factors I)) :=
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq _ _ _
(fun P : (factors I).toFinset => prime_of_factor _ (Multiset.mem_toFinset.mp P.prop))
(fun _ _ hij => Subtype.coe_injective.ne hij)
(calc
(∏ P : (factors I).toFinset, (P : Ideal R) ^ (factors I).count (P : Ideal R)) =
∏ P ∈ (factors I).toFinset, P ^ (factors I).count P :=
(factors I).toFinset.prod_coe_sort fun P => P ^ (factors I).count P
_ = ((factors I).map fun P => P).prod := (Finset.prod_multiset_map_count (factors I) id).symm
_ = (factors I).prod := by rw [Multiset.map_id']
_ = I := associated_iff_eq.mp (factors_prod hI)
)
@[simp]
theorem IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors_mk {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (x : R) :
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors hI (Ideal.Quotient.mk I x) = fun _P =>
Ideal.Quotient.mk _ x := rfl
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: if the ideal `I` factors as
`∏ i ∈ s, P i ^ e i`, then `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π (i : s), R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`.
This is a version of `IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq` where we restrict
the product to a finite subset `s` of a potentially infinite indexing type `ι`.
-/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfFinsetProdEq {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι}
(I : Ideal R) (P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j)
(prod_eq : ∏ i ∈ s, P i ^ e i = I) : R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ i : s, R ⧸ P i ^ e i :=
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq I (fun i : s => P i) (fun i : s => e i)
(fun i => prime i i.2) (fun i j h => coprime i i.2 j j.2 (Subtype.coe_injective.ne h))
(_root_.trans (Finset.prod_coe_sort s fun i => P i ^ e i) prod_eq)
/-- Corollary of the Chinese remainder theorem: given elements `x i : R / P i ^ e i`,
we can choose a representative `y : R` such that `y ≡ x i (mod P i ^ e i)`. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.exists_representative_mod_finset {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι}
(P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j) (x : ∀ i : s, R ⧸ P i ^ e i) :
∃ y, ∀ (i) (hi : i ∈ s), Ideal.Quotient.mk (P i ^ e i) y = x ⟨i, hi⟩ := by
let f := IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfFinsetProdEq _ P e prime coprime rfl
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := f.surjective x
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y
exact ⟨z, fun i _hi => rfl⟩
/-- Corollary of the Chinese remainder theorem: given elements `x i : R`,
we can choose a representative `y : R` such that `y - x i ∈ P i ^ e i`. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.exists_forall_sub_mem_ideal {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} (P : ι → Ideal R)
(e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j) (x : s → R) :
∃ y, ∀ (i) (hi : i ∈ s), y - x ⟨i, hi⟩ ∈ P i ^ e i := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ :=
IsDedekindDomain.exists_representative_mod_finset P e prime coprime fun i =>
Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (x i)
exact ⟨y, fun i hi => Ideal.Quotient.eq.mp (hy i hi)⟩
end DedekindDomain
end ChineseRemainder
section PID
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
variable {R}
variable [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
theorem span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd {a b : R} :
Ideal.span {a} ∣ Ideal.span ({b} : Set R) ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨fun h => mem_span_singleton.mp (dvd_iff_le.mp h (mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl b))), fun h =>
dvd_iff_le.mpr fun _d hd => mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_trans h (mem_span_singleton.mp hd))⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.squarefree_span_singleton {a : R} :
Squarefree (span {a}) ↔ Squarefree a := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h I hI ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd, ← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hx
simpa using h _ hx
· rw [← span_singleton_generator I, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd] at hI
exact isUnit_iff.mpr <| eq_top_of_isUnit_mem _ (Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_mem I) (h _ hI)
theorem singleton_span_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors [NormalizationMonoid R]
{a b : R} (ha : a ∈ normalizedFactors b) :
Ideal.span ({a} : Set R) ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· rw [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mpr hb, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero]
rw [hb, normalizedFactors_zero] at ha
exact absurd ha (Multiset.not_mem_zero a)
· suffices Prime (Ideal.span ({a} : Set R)) by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := exists_mem_normalizedFactors_of_dvd ?_ this.irreducible
(dvd_iff_le.mpr (span_singleton_le_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors ha)))
rwa [associated_iff_eq.mp hc']
· by_contra h
exact hb (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h)
rw [prime_iff_isPrime]
· exact (span_singleton_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero).mpr
(prime_of_normalized_factor a ha)
· by_contra h
exact (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span {a b : R} :
emultiplicity (Ideal.span {a}) (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) = emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases h : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd <;>
rw [Ideal.span_singleton_pow, span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd]
· exact pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
· apply h.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
apply lt_add_one
· suffices ¬FiniteMultiplicity (Ideal.span ({a} : Set R)) (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 this]
exact FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mpr fun n => by
rw [Ideal.span_singleton_pow, span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd]
exact FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp h n
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
/-- The bijection between the (normalized) prime factors of `r` and the (normalized) prime factors
of `span {r}` -/
noncomputable def normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
{ d : R | d ∈ normalizedFactors r } ≃
{ I : Ideal R | I ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({r} : Set R)) } := by
refine Equiv.ofBijective ?_ ?_
· exact fun d =>
⟨Ideal.span {↑d}, singleton_span_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors d.prop⟩
· refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, Subtype.coe_mk,
Subtype.coe_mk] at h
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mpr (mem_normalizedFactors_eq_of_associated ha hb h)
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
have : i.IsPrime := isPrime_of_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor i hi)
have := exists_mem_normalizedFactors_of_dvd hr
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.prime_generator_of_isPrime i
(prime_of_normalized_factor i hi).ne_zero).irreducible ?_
· obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := this
use ⟨a, ha⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr ha',
Ideal.span_singleton_generator]
· exact (Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd i).mp
((show Ideal.span {r} ≤ i from dvd_iff_le.mp (dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hi))
(mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl r)))
/-- The bijection `normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors` between the set of prime
factors of `r` and the set of prime factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` preserves multiplicities. See
`count_normalizedFactorsSpan_eq_count` for the version stated in terms of multisets `count`. -/
theorem emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_emultiplicity {r d : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (hd : d ∈ normalizedFactors r) :
emultiplicity d r =
emultiplicity (normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr ⟨d, hd⟩ : Ideal R)
(Ideal.span {r}) := by
simp only [normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors, emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span,
Subtype.coe_mk, Equiv.ofBijective_apply]
/-- The bijection `normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors.symm` between the set of prime
factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` and the set of prime factors of `r` preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_symm_eq_emultiplicity {r : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (I : { I : Ideal R | I ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({r} : Set R)) }) :
emultiplicity ((normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr).symm I : R) r =
emultiplicity (I : Ideal R) (Ideal.span {r}) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr).surjective I
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := x
rw [hx.symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, Subtype.coe_mk,
emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_emultiplicity hr ha]
variable [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq (Ideal R)]
/-- The bijection between the set of prime factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` and the set of prime factors
of `r` preserves `count` of the corresponding multisets. See
`multiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_multiplicity` for the version
stated in terms of multiplicity. -/
theorem count_span_normalizedFactors_eq {r X : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) (hX : Prime X) :
Multiset.count (Ideal.span {X} : Ideal R) (normalizedFactors (Ideal.span {r})) =
Multiset.count (normalize X) (normalizedFactors r) := by
have := emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span (R := R) (a := X) (b := r)
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors (Prime.irreducible hX) hr,
emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors (Prime.irreducible ?_), normalize_apply,
normUnit_eq_one, Units.val_one, one_eq_top, mul_top, Nat.cast_inj] at this
· simp only [normalize_apply, this]
· simp only [Submodule.zero_eq_bot, ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot, hr, not_false_eq_true]
· simpa only [prime_span_singleton_iff]
theorem count_span_normalizedFactors_eq_of_normUnit {r X : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (hX₁ : normUnit X = 1) (hX : Prime X) :
Multiset.count (Ideal.span {X} : Ideal R) (normalizedFactors (Ideal.span {r})) =
Multiset.count X (normalizedFactors r) := by
simpa [hX₁, normalize_apply] using count_span_normalizedFactors_eq hr hX
end NormalizationMonoid
|
end PID
section primesOverFinset
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The finite set of all prime factors of the pushforward of `p`. -/
noncomputable abbrev primesOverFinset {A : Type*} [CommRing A] (p : Ideal A) (B : Type*)
[CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] [Algebra A B] : Finset (Ideal B) :=
(factors (p.map (algebraMap A B))).toFinset
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] {p : Ideal A} (hpb : p ≠ ⊥) [hpm : p.IsMaximal]
(B : Type*) [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] [Algebra A B] [NoZeroSMulDivisors A B]
include hpb in
theorem coe_primesOverFinset : primesOverFinset p B = primesOver p B := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 1,451 | 1,468 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Divisibility over ℤ
This file collects results for the integers that use ring theory in their proofs or
cases of ℤ being examples of structures in ring theory.
## Main statements
* `Int.Prime.dvd_mul'`: A prime number dividing a product in ℤ divides at least one factor.
* `Int.exists_prime_and_dvd`: Every non-unit integer has a prime divisor.
* `Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime`: Primality in ℤ corresponds to primality of its absolute value in ℕ.
* `Int.span_natAbs`: The principal ideal generated by `a.natAbs` is equal to that of `a`.
## Tags
prime, irreducible, integers, normalization monoid, gcd monoid, greatest common divisor
-/
namespace Int
| @[deprecated "use `isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.symm` instead" (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem gcd_eq_one_iff_coprime {a b : ℤ} : Int.gcd a b = 1 ↔ IsCoprime a b :=
isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.symm
theorem isCoprime_iff_nat_coprime {a b : ℤ} : IsCoprime a b ↔ Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, gcd_eq_natAbs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_iff_nat_coprime := isCoprime_iff_nat_coprime
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) ≠ 1`, then `gcd a m ≠ 1` or `gcd a n ≠ 1`. -/
theorem gcd_ne_one_iff_gcd_mul_right_ne_one {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} :
a.gcd (m * n) ≠ 1 ↔ a.gcd m ≠ 1 ∨ a.gcd n ≠ 1 := by
simp only [← isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, ← not_and_or, not_iff_not, IsCoprime.mul_right_iff]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Int/Basic.lean | 33 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Duplicate
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
/-!
# Equivalence between `Fin (length l)` and elements of a list
Given a list `l`,
* if `l` has no duplicates, then `List.Nodup.getEquiv` is the equivalence between
`Fin (length l)` and `{x // x ∈ l}` sending `i` to `⟨get l i, _⟩` with the inverse
sending `⟨x, hx⟩` to `⟨indexOf x l, _⟩`;
* if `l` has no duplicates and contains every element of a type `α`, then
`List.Nodup.getEquivOfForallMemList` defines an equivalence between `Fin (length l)` and `α`;
if `α` does not have decidable equality, then
there is a bijection `List.Nodup.getBijectionOfForallMemList`;
* if `l` is sorted w.r.t. `(<)`, then `List.Sorted.getIso` is the same bijection reinterpreted
as an `OrderIso`.
-/
namespace List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Nodup
/-- If `l` lists all the elements of `α` without duplicates, then `List.get` defines
a bijection `Fin l.length → α`. See `List.Nodup.getEquivOfForallMemList`
for a version giving an equivalence when there is decidable equality. -/
@[simps]
def getBijectionOfForallMemList (l : List α) (nd : l.Nodup) (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l) :
{ f : Fin l.length → α // Function.Bijective f } :=
⟨fun i => l.get i, fun _ _ h => nd.get_inj_iff.1 h,
fun x =>
let ⟨i, hl⟩ := List.mem_iff_get.1 (h x)
⟨i, hl⟩⟩
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- If `l` has no duplicates, then `List.get` defines an equivalence between `Fin (length l)` and
the set of elements of `l`. -/
@[simps]
def getEquiv (l : List α) (H : Nodup l) : Fin (length l) ≃ { x // x ∈ l } where
toFun i := ⟨get l i, get_mem _ _⟩
invFun x := ⟨idxOf (↑x) l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 x.2⟩
left_inv i := by simp only [List.get_idxOf, eq_self_iff_true, Fin.eta, Subtype.coe_mk, H]
right_inv x := by simp
/-- If `l` lists all the elements of `α` without duplicates, then `List.get` defines
an equivalence between `Fin l.length` and `α`.
See `List.Nodup.getBijectionOfForallMemList` for a version without
decidable equality. -/
@[simps]
def getEquivOfForallMemList (l : List α) (nd : l.Nodup) (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l) :
Fin l.length ≃ α where
toFun i := l.get i
invFun a := ⟨_, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 (h a)⟩
left_inv i := by simp [List.idxOf_getElem, nd]
right_inv a := by simp
end Nodup
namespace Sorted
variable [Preorder α] {l : List α}
theorem get_mono (h : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·)) : Monotone l.get := fun _ _ => h.rel_get_of_le
theorem get_strictMono (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) : StrictMono l.get := fun _ _ => h.rel_get_of_lt
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- If `l` is a list sorted w.r.t. `(<)`, then `List.get` defines an order isomorphism between
`Fin (length l)` and the set of elements of `l`. -/
def getIso (l : List α) (H : Sorted (· < ·) l) : Fin (length l) ≃o { x // x ∈ l } where
toEquiv := H.nodup.getEquiv l
map_rel_iff' := H.get_strictMono.le_iff_le
variable (H : Sorted (· < ·) l) {x : { x // x ∈ l }} {i : Fin l.length}
@[simp]
theorem coe_getIso_apply : (H.getIso l i : α) = get l i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_getIso_symm_apply : ((H.getIso l).symm x : ℕ) = idxOf (↑x) l :=
rfl
end Sorted
section Sublist
/-- If there is `f`, an order-preserving embedding of `ℕ` into `ℕ` such that
any element of `l` found at index `ix` can be found at index `f ix` in `l'`,
then `Sublist l l'`.
-/
theorem sublist_of_orderEmbedding_getElem?_eq {l l' : List α} (f : ℕ ↪o ℕ)
(hf : ∀ ix : ℕ, l[ix]? = l'[f ix]?) : l <+ l' := by
induction' l with hd tl IH generalizing l' f
· simp
have : some hd = l'[f 0]? := by simpa using hf 0
rw [eq_comm, List.getElem?_eq_some_iff] at this
obtain ⟨w, h⟩ := this
let f' : ℕ ↪o ℕ :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun i => f (i + 1) - (f 0 + 1)) fun a b => by
dsimp only
| rw [Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right, OrderEmbedding.le_iff_le, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, OrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt]
exact b.succ_pos
have : ∀ ix, tl[ix]? = (l'.drop (f 0 + 1))[f' ix]? := by
intro ix
rw [List.getElem?_drop, OrderEmbedding.coe_ofMapLEIff, Nat.add_sub_cancel', ← hf]
simp only [getElem?_cons_succ]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, OrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt]
exact ix.succ_pos
rw [← List.take_append_drop (f 0 + 1) l', ← List.singleton_append]
apply List.Sublist.append _ (IH _ this)
rw [List.singleton_sublist, ← h, l'.getElem_take' _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
exact List.getElem_mem _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias sublist_of_orderEmbedding_get?_eq :=
sublist_of_orderEmbedding_getElem?_eq
/-- A `l : List α` is `Sublist l l'` for `l' : List α` iff
there is `f`, an order-preserving embedding of `ℕ` into `ℕ` such that
any element of `l` found at index `ix` can be found at index `f ix` in `l'`.
-/
theorem sublist_iff_exists_orderEmbedding_getElem?_eq {l l' : List α} :
l <+ l' ↔ ∃ f : ℕ ↪o ℕ, ∀ ix : ℕ, l[ix]? = l'[f ix]? := by
constructor
· intro H
| Mathlib/Data/List/NodupEquivFin.lean | 116 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectL
section sectR
lemma uIcc_map_sectR [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectR c _) = uIcc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectR : (Icc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Icc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectR : (Ioc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectR : (Ico a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ico (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectR : (Ioo a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioo (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectR
end Prod
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
| classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 742 | 743 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a * 0 = 0`
* `a * (b₁ + b₂) = (a * b₁) + (a * b₂)`
-/
def evalMul₁ {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul {d : R} (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
/-- Multiplies two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 * b = 0`
* `(a₁ + a₂) * b = (a₁ * b) + (a₂ * b)`
-/
def evalMul {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by simp
theorem natCast_mul {a₁ a₃ : ℕ} (a₂) (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁)
(_ : ((a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₃) : ((a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ ^ a₂ * b₃ := by
subst_vars; simp
theorem natCast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 := Nat.cast_zero
theorem natCast_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ}
(_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) : ((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
mutual
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* An atom `e` causes `↑e` to be allocated as a new atom.
* A sum delegates to `ExSum.evalNatCast`.
-/
partial def ExBase.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
| .sum va => do
let ⟨_, vc, p⟩ ← va.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .sum vc, p⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat monomial to produce a monomial in `α`.
* `↑c = c` if `c` is a numeric literal
* `↑(a ^ n * b) = ↑a ^ n * ↑b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .const c hc =>
have n : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
pure ⟨q(Nat.rawCast $n), .const c hc, (q(natCast_nat (R := $α) $n) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₃, pb₃⟩ ← va₃.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .mul vb₁ va₂ vb₃, q(natCast_mul $a₂ $pb₁ $pb₃)⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* `↑0 = 0`
* `↑(a + b) = ↑a + ↑b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .zero => pure ⟨_, .zero, q(natCast_zero (R := $α))⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← va₂.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, q(natCast_add $pb₁ $pb₂)⟩
end
theorem smul_nat {a b c : ℕ} (_ : (a * b : ℕ) = c) : a • b = c := by subst_vars; simp
theorem smul_eq_cast {a : ℕ} (_ : ((a : ℕ) : R) = a') (_ : a' * b = c) : a • b = c := by
subst_vars; simp
/-- Constructs the scalar multiplication `n • a`, where both `n : ℕ` and `a : α` are normalized
polynomial expressions.
* `a • b = a * b` if `α = ℕ`
* `a • b = ↑a * b` otherwise
-/
def evalNSMul {a : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a • $b)) := do
if ← isDefEq sα sℕ then
let ⟨_, va'⟩ := va.cast
have _b : Q(ℕ) := b
let ⟨(_c : Q(ℕ)), vc, (pc : Q($a * $_b = $_c))⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_nat $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, va', pa'⟩ ← va.evalNatCast sα
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_eq_cast $pa' $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_one_mul {R} [Ring R] {a b : R} (_ : (Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * a = b) :
-a = b := by subst_vars; simp [Int.negOfNat]
theorem neg_mul {R} [Ring R] (a₁ : R) (a₂) {a₃ b : R}
(_ : -a₃ = b) : -(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃) = a₁ ^ a₂ * b := by subst_vars; simp
/-- Negates a monomial `va` to get another monomial.
* `-c = (-c)` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * -a₂`
-/
def evalNegProd {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExProd sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q(-$a) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va with
| .const za ha =>
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit 1
let ⟨m1, _⟩ := ExProd.mkNegNat sα rα 1
let rm := Result.isNegNat rα lit (q(IsInt.of_raw $α (.negOfNat $lit)) : Expr)
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
let rb := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($m1 * $a) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) rm ra).get!
let ⟨zb, hb⟩ := rb.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨b, (pb : Q((Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * $a = $b))⟩ := rb.toRawEq
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(neg_one_mul (R := $α) $pb) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalNegProd rα va₃
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vb, (q(neg_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pb) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_zero {R} [Ring R] : -(0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem neg_add {R} [Ring R] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : R}
(_ : -a₁ = b₁) (_ : -a₂ = b₂) : -(a₁ + a₂) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_comm]
/-- Negates a polynomial `va` to get another polynomial.
* `-0 = 0` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ + a₂) = -a₁ + -a₂`
-/
def evalNeg {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q(-$a) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, (q(neg_zero (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← evalNegProd sα rα va₁
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← evalNeg rα va₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, (q(neg_add $pb₁ $pb₂) : Expr)⟩
theorem sub_pf {R} [Ring R] {a b c d : R}
(_ : -b = c) (_ : a + c = d) : a - b = d := by subst_vars; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Subtracts two polynomials `va, vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a - b = a + -b`
-/
def evalSub {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {a b : Q($α)}
(rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a - $b) := do
let ⟨_c, vc, pc⟩ ← evalNeg sα rα vb
let ⟨d, vd, (pd : Q($a + $_c = $d))⟩ ← evalAdd sα va vc
return ⟨d, vd, (q(sub_pf $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem pow_prod_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = (a + 0) ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression. (This has a slightly different normalization than `evalPowAtom` because
the input types are different.)
* `x ^ e = (x + 0) ^ e * 1`
-/
def evalPowProdAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (ExBase.sum va.toSum).toProd vb, q(pow_prod_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem pow_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = a ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression.
* `x ^ e = x ^ e * 1 + 0`
-/
def evalPowAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (va.toProd vb).toSum, q(pow_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem const_pos (n : ℕ) (h : Nat.ble 1 n = true) : 0 < (n.rawCast : ℕ) := Nat.le_of_ble_eq_true h
theorem mul_exp_pos {a₁ a₂ : ℕ} (n) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ ^ n * a₂ :=
Nat.mul_pos (Nat.pow_pos h₁) h₂
theorem add_pos_left {a₁ : ℕ} (a₂) (h : 0 < a₁) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem add_pos_right {a₂ : ℕ} (a₁) (h : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
mutual
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* Atoms are not (necessarily) positive
* Sums defer to `ExSum.evalPos`
-/
partial def ExBase.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => none
| .sum va => va.evalPos
/-- Attempts to prove that a monomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < c` (where `c` is a numeral) is true by the normalization invariant (`c` is not zero)
* `0 < x ^ e * b` if `0 < x` and `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
-- it must be positive because it is a nonzero nat literal
have lit : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
haveI : $a =Q Nat.rawCast $lit := ⟨⟩
haveI p : Nat.ble 1 $lit =Q true := ⟨⟩
some q(const_pos $lit $p)
| .mul (e := ea₁) vxa₁ _ va₂ => do
let pa₁ ← vxa₁.evalPos
let pa₂ ← va₂.evalPos
some q(mul_exp_pos $ea₁ $pa₁ $pa₂)
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < 0` fails
* `0 < a + b` if `0 < a` or `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .zero => none
| .add (a := a₁) (b := a₂) va₁ va₂ => do
match va₁.evalPos with
| some p => some q(add_pos_left $a₂ $p)
| none => let p ← va₂.evalPos; some q(add_pos_right $a₁ $p)
end
theorem pow_one (a : R) : a ^ nat_lit 1 = a := by simp
theorem pow_bit0 {k : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) :
a ^ (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) = c := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
theorem pow_bit1 {k : ℕ} {d : R} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) (_ : c * a = d) :
a ^ (Nat.add (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) (nat_lit 1)) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
/--
The main case of exponentiation of ring expressions is when `va` is a polynomial and `n` is a
nonzero literal expression, like `(x + y)^5`. In this case we work out the polynomial completely
into a sum of monomials.
* `x ^ 1 = x`
* `x ^ (2*n) = x ^ n * x ^ n`
* `x ^ (2*n+1) = x ^ n * x ^ n * x`
-/
partial def evalPowNat {a : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (n : Q(ℕ)) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $n) := do
let nn := n.natLit!
if nn = 1 then
return ⟨_, va, (q(pow_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let nm := nn >>> 1
have m : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit nm
if nn &&& 1 = 0 then
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
return ⟨_, vc, (q(pow_bit0 $pb $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalMul sα vc va
return ⟨_, vd, (q(pow_bit1 $pb $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem one_pow (b : ℕ) : ((nat_lit 1).rawCast : R) ^ b = (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
theorem mul_pow {ea₁ b c₁ : ℕ} {xa₁ : R}
(_ : ea₁ * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ ^ b = c₂) : (xa₁ ^ ea₁ * a₂ : R) ^ b = xa₁ ^ c₁ * c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_pow, pow_mul]
/-- There are several special cases when exponentiating monomials:
* `1 ^ n = 1`
* `x ^ y = (x ^ y)` when `x` and `y` are constants
* `(a * b) ^ e = a ^ e * b ^ e`
In all other cases we use `evalPowProdAtom`.
-/
def evalPowProd {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
let res : OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b)) := do
match va, vb with
| .const 1, _ => return ⟨_, va, (q(one_pow (R := $α) $b) : Expr)⟩
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
assert! 0 ≤ zb
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
have lit : Q(ℕ) := b.appArg!
let rb := (q(IsNat.of_raw ℕ $lit) : Expr)
let rc ← NormNum.evalPow.core q($a ^ $b) q(HPow.hPow) q($a) q($b) lit rb
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul vxa₁ vea₁ va₂, vb =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sℕ vea₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalPowProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa₁ vc₁ vc₂, q(mul_pow $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
return (← res.run).getD (evalPowProdAtom sα va vb)
/--
The result of `extractCoeff` is a numeral and a proof that the original expression
factors by this numeral.
-/
structure ExtractCoeff (e : Q(ℕ)) where
/-- A raw natural number literal. -/
k : Q(ℕ)
/-- The result of extracting the coefficient is a monic monomial. -/
e' : Q(ℕ)
/-- `e'` is a monomial. -/
ve' : ExProd sℕ e'
/-- The proof that `e` splits into the coefficient `k` and the monic monomial `e'`. -/
p : Q($e = $e' * $k)
theorem coeff_one (k : ℕ) : k.rawCast = (nat_lit 1).rawCast * k := by simp
theorem coeff_mul {a₃ c₂ k : ℕ}
(a₁ a₂ : ℕ) (_ : a₃ = c₂ * k) : a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ = (a₁ ^ a₂ * c₂) * k := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
/-- Given a monomial expression `va`, splits off the leading coefficient `k` and the remainder
`e'`, stored in the `ExtractCoeff` structure.
* `c = 1 * c` (if `c` is a constant)
* `a * b = (a * b') * k` if `b = b' * k`
-/
def extractCoeff {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : ExtractCoeff a :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
have k : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
⟨k, q((nat_lit 1).rawCast), .const 1, (q(coeff_one $k) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff va₃
⟨k, _, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, q(coeff_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pc)⟩
theorem pow_one_cast (a : R) : a ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp
theorem zero_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : 0 < b) : (0 : R) ^ b = 0 := match b with | b+1 => by simp [pow_succ]
theorem single_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ b = c) : (a + 0) ^ b = c + 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem pow_nat {b c k : ℕ} {d e : R} (_ : b = c * k) (_ : a ^ c = d) (_ : d ^ k = e) :
(a : R) ^ b = e := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_mul]
/-- Exponentiates a polynomial `va` by a monomial `vb`, including several special cases.
* `a ^ 1 = a`
* `0 ^ e = 0` if `0 < e`
* `(a + 0) ^ b = a ^ b` computed using `evalPowProd`
* `a ^ b = (a ^ b') ^ k` if `b = b' * k` and `k > 1`
Otherwise `a ^ b` is just encoded as `a ^ b * 1 + 0` using `evalPowAtom`.
-/
partial def evalPow₁ {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
match va, vb with
| va, .const 1 =>
haveI : $b =Q Nat.rawCast (nat_lit 1) := ⟨⟩
return ⟨_, va, q(pow_one_cast $a)⟩
| .zero, vb => match vb.evalPos with
| some p => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_pow (R := $α) $p)⟩
| none => return evalPowAtom sα (.sum .zero) vb
| ExSum.add va .zero, vb => -- TODO: using `.add` here takes a while to compile?
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalPowProd sα va vb
return ⟨_, vc.toSum, q(single_pow $pc)⟩
| va, vb =>
if vb.coeff > 1 then
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalPow₁ va vc
let ⟨_, ve, pe⟩ ← evalPowNat sα vd k
return ⟨_, ve, q(pow_nat $pc $pd $pe)⟩
else
return evalPowAtom sα (.sum va) vb
theorem pow_zero (a : R) : a ^ 0 = (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
|
theorem pow_add {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} {d : R}
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 870 | 871 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.OpenNhds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.UniqueGluing
/-!
# Stalks
For a presheaf `F` on a topological space `X`, valued in some category `C`, the *stalk* of `F`
at the point `x : X` is defined as the colimit of the composition of the inclusion of categories
`(OpenNhds x)ᵒᵖ ⥤ (Opens X)ᵒᵖ` and the functor `F : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C`.
For an open neighborhood `U` of `x`, we define the map `F.germ x : F.obj (op U) ⟶ F.stalk x` as the
canonical morphism into this colimit.
Taking stalks is functorial: For every point `x : X` we define a functor `stalkFunctor C x`,
sending presheaves on `X` to objects of `C`. Furthermore, for a map `f : X ⟶ Y` between
topological spaces, we define `stalkPushforward` as the induced map on the stalks
`(f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x`.
Some lemmas about stalks and germs only hold for certain classes of concrete categories. A basic
property of forgetful functors of categories of algebraic structures (like `MonCat`,
`CommRingCat`,...) is that they preserve filtered colimits. Since stalks are filtered colimits,
this ensures that the stalks of presheaves valued in these categories behave exactly as for
`Type`-valued presheaves. For example, in `germ_exist` we prove that in such a category, every
element of the stalk is the germ of a section.
Furthermore, if we require the forgetful functor to reflect isomorphisms and preserve limits (as
is the case for most algebraic structures), we have access to the unique gluing API and can prove
further properties. Most notably, in `is_iso_iff_stalk_functor_map_iso`, we prove that in such
a category, a morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism if and only if all of its stalk maps are
isomorphisms.
See also the definition of "algebraic structures" in the stacks project:
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/007L
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
noncomputable section
universe v u v' u'
open CategoryTheory
open TopCat
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open TopologicalSpace Topology
open Opposite
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasColimits.{v} C]
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{v}}
namespace TopCat.Presheaf
variable (C) in
/-- Stalks are functorial with respect to morphisms of presheaves over a fixed `X`. -/
def stalkFunctor (x : X) : X.Presheaf C ⥤ C :=
(whiskeringLeft _ _ C).obj (OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ colim
/-- The stalk of a presheaf `F` at a point `x` is calculated as the colimit of the functor
nbhds x ⥤ opens F.X ⥤ C
-/
def stalk (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : C :=
(stalkFunctor C x).obj ℱ
-- -- colimit ((open_nhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ)
@[simp]
theorem stalkFunctor_obj (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : (stalkFunctor C x).obj ℱ = ℱ.stalk x :=
rfl
/-- The germ of a section of a presheaf over an open at a point of that open.
-/
def germ (F : X.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) : F.obj (op U) ⟶ stalk F x :=
colimit.ι ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) (op ⟨U, hx⟩)
/-- The germ of a global section of a presheaf at a point. -/
def Γgerm (F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : F.obj (op ⊤) ⟶ stalk F x :=
F.germ ⊤ x True.intro
@[reassoc]
theorem germ_res (F : X.Presheaf C) {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i.op ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.germ V x (i.le hx) :=
let i' : (⟨U, hx⟩ : OpenNhds x) ⟶ ⟨V, i.le hx⟩ := i
colimit.w ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) i'.op
/-- A variant of `germ_res` with `op V ⟶ op U`
so that the LHS is more general and simp fires more easier. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem germ_res' (F : X.Presheaf C) {U V : Opens X} (i : op V ⟶ op U) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.germ V x (i.unop.le hx) :=
let i' : (⟨U, hx⟩ : OpenNhds x) ⟶ ⟨V, i.unop.le hx⟩ := i.unop
colimit.w ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) i'.op
@[reassoc]
lemma map_germ_eq_Γgerm (F : X.Presheaf C) {U : Opens X} {i : U ⟶ ⊤} (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i.op ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.Γgerm x :=
germ_res F i x hx
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type*} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
theorem germ_res_apply (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i.op s) = F.germ V x (i.le hx) s := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, germ_res]
theorem germ_res_apply' (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U V : Opens X} (i : op V ⟶ op U) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i s) = F.germ V x (i.unop.le hx) s := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, germ_res']
lemma Γgerm_res_apply (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U : Opens X} {i : U ⟶ ⊤} (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i.op s) = F.Γgerm x s := F.germ_res_apply i x hx s
/-- A morphism from the stalk of `F` at `x` to some object `Y` is completely determined by its
composition with the `germ` morphisms.
-/
@[ext]
theorem stalk_hom_ext (F : X.Presheaf C) {x} {Y : C} {f₁ f₂ : F.stalk x ⟶ Y}
(ih : ∀ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U), F.germ U x hxU ≫ f₁ = F.germ U x hxU ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ :=
colimit.hom_ext fun U => by
induction U with | op U => obtain ⟨U, hxU⟩ := U; exact ih U hxU
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ {F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) :
F.germ U x hx ≫ (stalkFunctor C x).map f = f.app (op U) ≫ G.germ U x hx :=
colimit.ι_map (whiskerLeft (OpenNhds.inclusion x).op f) (op ⟨U, hx⟩)
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply [ConcreteCategory C FC]
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) (s) :
(stalkFunctor C x).map f (F.germ U x hx s) = G.germ U x hx (f.app (op U) s) := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← stalkFunctor_map_germ, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
rfl
-- a variant of `stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply` that makes simpNF happy.
@[simp]
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply' [ConcreteCategory C FC]
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) (s) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ToHom (F.stalk x) (G.stalk x))
(ConcreteCategory.hom ((stalkFunctor C x).map f)) (F.germ U x hx s) =
G.germ U x hx (f.app (op U) s) :=
stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply U x hx f s
variable (C)
/-- For a presheaf `F` on a space `X`, a continuous map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a morphisms between the
stalk of `f _ * F` at `f x` and the stalk of `F` at `x`.
-/
def stalkPushforward (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : (f _* F).stalk (f x) ⟶ F.stalk x := by
-- This is a hack; Lean doesn't like to elaborate the term written directly.
refine ?_ ≫ colimit.pre _ (OpenNhds.map f x).op
exact colim.map (whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) F)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem stalkPushforward_germ (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : X.Presheaf C) (U : Opens Y)
(x : X) (hx : f x ∈ U) :
(f _* F).germ U (f x) hx ≫ F.stalkPushforward C f x = F.germ ((Opens.map f).obj U) x hx := by
simp [germ, stalkPushforward]
-- Here are two other potential solutions, suggested by @fpvandoorn at
-- <https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/1018#discussion_r283978240>
-- However, I can't get the subsequent two proofs to work with either one.
-- def stalkPushforward'' (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
-- (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- colim.map ((Functor.associator _ _ _).inv ≫
-- whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) ℱ) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (OpenNhds.map f x).op
-- def stalkPushforward''' (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
-- (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- (colim.map (whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) ℱ) :
-- colim.obj ((OpenNhds.inclusion (f x) ⋙ Opens.map f).op ⋙ ℱ) ⟶ _) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (OpenNhds.map f x).op
namespace stalkPushforward
@[simp]
theorem id (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
ℱ.stalkPushforward C (𝟙 X) x = (stalkFunctor C x).map (Pushforward.id ℱ).hom := by
ext
simp only [stalkPushforward, germ, colim_map, ι_colimMap_assoc, whiskerRight_app]
erw [CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id]
simp [stalkFunctor]
@[simp]
theorem comp (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
ℱ.stalkPushforward C (f ≫ g) x =
(f _* ℱ).stalkPushforward C g (f x) ≫ ℱ.stalkPushforward C f x := by
ext
simp [germ, stalkPushforward]
theorem stalkPushforward_iso_of_isInducing {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f)
(F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : IsIso (F.stalkPushforward _ f x) := by
haveI := Functor.initial_of_adjunction (hf.adjunctionNhds x)
convert (Functor.Final.colimitIso (OpenNhds.map f x).op ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F)).isIso_hom
refine stalk_hom_ext _ fun U hU ↦ (stalkPushforward_germ _ f F _ x hU).trans ?_
symm
exact colimit.ι_pre ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) (OpenNhds.map f x).op _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-27")]
alias stalkPushforward_iso_of_isOpenEmbedding := stalkPushforward_iso_of_isInducing
end stalkPushforward
section stalkPullback
/-- The morphism `ℱ_{f x} ⟶ (f⁻¹ℱ)ₓ` that factors through `(f_*f⁻¹ℱ)_{f x}`. -/
def stalkPullbackHom (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
F.stalk (f x) ⟶ ((pullback C f).obj F).stalk x :=
(stalkFunctor _ (f x)).map ((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F) ≫
stalkPushforward _ _ _ x
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germ_stalkPullbackHom
(f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (x : X) (U : Opens Y) (hU : f x ∈ U) :
F.germ U (f x) hU ≫ stalkPullbackHom C f F x =
((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F).app _ ≫
((pullback C f).obj F).germ ((Opens.map f).obj U) x hU := by
simp [stalkPullbackHom, germ, stalkFunctor, stalkPushforward]
/-- The morphism `(f⁻¹ℱ)(U) ⟶ ℱ_{f(x)}` for some `U ∋ x`. -/
def germToPullbackStalk (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
((pullback C f).obj F).obj (op U) ⟶ F.stalk (f x) :=
((Opens.map f).op.isPointwiseLeftKanExtensionLeftKanExtensionUnit F (op U)).desc
{ pt := F.stalk ((f : X → Y) (x : X))
ι :=
{ app := fun V => F.germ _ (f x) (V.hom.unop.le hx)
naturality := fun _ _ i => by simp } }
variable {C} in
@[ext]
lemma pullback_obj_obj_ext {Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {F : Y.Presheaf C} (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ)
{φ ψ : ((pullback C f).obj F).obj U ⟶ Z}
(h : ∀ (V : Opens Y) (hV : U.unop ≤ (Opens.map f).obj V),
((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F).app (op V) ≫
((pullback C f).obj F).map (homOfLE hV).op ≫ φ =
((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F).app (op V) ≫
((pullback C f).obj F).map (homOfLE hV).op ≫ ψ) : φ = ψ := by
obtain ⟨U⟩ := U
apply ((Opens.map f).op.isPointwiseLeftKanExtensionLeftKanExtensionUnit F _).hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨V⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩
simpa [pushforwardPullbackAdjunction, Functor.lanAdjunction_unit]
using h V (leOfHom b)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_pullback_map_germToPullbackStalk
(f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (V : Opens Y)
(hV : U ≤ (Opens.map f).obj V) :
((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F).app (op V) ≫
((pullback C f).obj F).map (homOfLE hV).op ≫ germToPullbackStalk C f F U x hx =
F.germ _ (f x) (hV hx) := by
simpa [pushforwardPullbackAdjunction] using
((Opens.map f).op.isPointwiseLeftKanExtensionLeftKanExtensionUnit F (op U)).fac _
(CostructuredArrow.mk (homOfLE hV).op)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germToPullbackStalk_stalkPullbackHom
(f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
germToPullbackStalk C f F U x hx ≫ stalkPullbackHom C f F x =
((pullback C f).obj F).germ _ x hx := by
ext V hV
dsimp
simp only [pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_pullback_map_germToPullbackStalk_assoc,
germ_stalkPullbackHom, germ_res]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_app_app_germToPullbackStalk
(f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (V : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ) (x : X) (hx : f x ∈ V.unop) :
((pushforwardPullbackAdjunction C f).unit.app F).app V ≫ germToPullbackStalk C f F _ x hx =
F.germ _ (f x) hx := by
simpa using pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_pullback_map_germToPullbackStalk
C f F ((Opens.map f).obj V.unop) x hx V.unop (by rfl)
/-- The morphism `(f⁻¹ℱ)ₓ ⟶ ℱ_{f(x)}`. -/
def stalkPullbackInv (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
((pullback C f).obj F).stalk x ⟶ F.stalk (f x) :=
colimit.desc ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ (Presheaf.pullback C f).obj F)
{ pt := F.stalk (f x)
ι :=
{ app := fun U => F.germToPullbackStalk _ f (unop U).1 x (unop U).2
naturality := fun U V i => by
dsimp
ext W hW
dsimp [OpenNhds.inclusion]
rw [Category.comp_id, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_pullback_map_germToPullbackStalk]
erw [pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_pullback_map_germToPullbackStalk] } }
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germ_stalkPullbackInv (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (x : X) (V : Opens X) (hV : x ∈ V) :
((pullback C f).obj F).germ _ x hV ≫ stalkPullbackInv C f F x =
F.germToPullbackStalk _ f V x hV := by
apply colimit.ι_desc
/-- The isomorphism `ℱ_{f(x)} ≅ (f⁻¹ℱ)ₓ`. -/
def stalkPullbackIso (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : Y.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
F.stalk (f x) ≅ ((pullback C f).obj F).stalk x where
hom := stalkPullbackHom _ _ _ _
inv := stalkPullbackInv _ _ _ _
hom_inv_id := by
ext U hU
dsimp
rw [germ_stalkPullbackHom_assoc, germ_stalkPullbackInv, Category.comp_id,
pushforwardPullbackAdjunction_unit_app_app_germToPullbackStalk]
inv_hom_id := by
ext V hV
dsimp
rw [germ_stalkPullbackInv_assoc, Category.comp_id, germToPullbackStalk_stalkPullbackHom]
end stalkPullback
section stalkSpecializes
variable {C}
/-- If `x` specializes to `y`, then there is a natural map `F.stalk y ⟶ F.stalk x`. -/
noncomputable def stalkSpecializes (F : X.Presheaf C) {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) :
F.stalk y ⟶ F.stalk x := by
refine colimit.desc _ ⟨_, fun U => ?_, ?_⟩
· exact
colimit.ι ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F)
(op ⟨(unop U).1, (specializes_iff_forall_open.mp h _ (unop U).1.2 (unop U).2 :)⟩)
· intro U V i
dsimp
rw [Category.comp_id]
let U' : OpenNhds x := ⟨_, (specializes_iff_forall_open.mp h _ (unop U).1.2 (unop U).2 :)⟩
let V' : OpenNhds x := ⟨_, (specializes_iff_forall_open.mp h _ (unop V).1.2 (unop V).2 :)⟩
exact colimit.w ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) (show V' ⟶ U' from i.unop).op
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise nosimp]
theorem germ_stalkSpecializes (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U : Opens X} {y : X} (hy : y ∈ U) {x : X} (h : x ⤳ y) :
F.germ U y hy ≫ F.stalkSpecializes h = F.germ U x (h.mem_open U.isOpen hy) :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[simp]
theorem stalkSpecializes_refl {C : Type*} [Category C] [Limits.HasColimits C] {X : TopCat}
(F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : F.stalkSpecializes (specializes_refl x) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem stalkSpecializes_comp {C : Type*} [Category C] [Limits.HasColimits C] {X : TopCat}
(F : X.Presheaf C) {x y z : X} (h : x ⤳ y) (h' : y ⤳ z) :
| F.stalkSpecializes h' ≫ F.stalkSpecializes h = F.stalkSpecializes (h.trans h') := by
ext
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Stalks.lean | 354 | 358 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Short complexes
This file defines the category `ShortComplex C` of diagrams
`X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that the composition is zero.
Note: This structure `ShortComplex C` was first introduced in
the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable (C D : Type*) [Category C] [Category D]
/-- A short complex in a category `C` with zero morphisms is the datum
of two composable morphisms `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that
`f ≫ g = 0`. -/
structure ShortComplex [HasZeroMorphisms C] where
/-- the first (left) object of a `ShortComplex` -/
{X₁ : C}
/-- the second (middle) object of a `ShortComplex` -/
{X₂ : C}
/-- the third (right) object of a `ShortComplex` -/
{X₃ : C}
/-- the first morphism of a `ShortComplex` -/
f : X₁ ⟶ X₂
/-- the second morphism of a `ShortComplex` -/
g : X₂ ⟶ X₃
/-- the composition of the two given morphisms is zero -/
zero : f ≫ g = 0
namespace ShortComplex
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ShortComplex.zero
variable {C}
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- Morphisms of short complexes are the commutative diagrams of the obvious shape. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C) where
/-- the morphism on the left objects -/
τ₁ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁
/-- the morphism on the middle objects -/
τ₂ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₂
/-- the morphism on the right objects -/
τ₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃
/-- the left commutative square of a morphism in `ShortComplex` -/
comm₁₂ : τ₁ ≫ S₂.f = S₁.f ≫ τ₂ := by aesop_cat
/-- the right commutative square of a morphism in `ShortComplex` -/
comm₂₃ : τ₂ ≫ S₂.g = S₁.g ≫ τ₃ := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] Hom.comm₁₂ Hom.comm₂₃
attribute [local simp] Hom.comm₁₂ Hom.comm₂₃ Hom.comm₁₂_assoc Hom.comm₂₃_assoc
variable (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def Hom.id : Hom S S where
τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of morphisms of short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def Hom.comp (φ₁₂ : Hom S₁ S₂) (φ₂₃ : Hom S₂ S₃) : Hom S₁ S₃ where
τ₁ := φ₁₂.τ₁ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₁
τ₂ := φ₁₂.τ₂ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₂
τ₃ := φ₁₂.τ₃ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₃
instance : Category (ShortComplex C) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := Hom.comp
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext (f g : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : f.τ₁ = g.τ₁) (h₂ : f.τ₂ = g.τ₂) (h₃ : f.τ₃ = g.τ₃) : f = g :=
Hom.ext h₁ h₂ h₃
/-- A constructor for morphisms in `ShortComplex C` when the commutativity conditions
are not obvious. -/
@[simps]
def homMk {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (τ₁ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (τ₂ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₂)
(τ₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (comm₁₂ : τ₁ ≫ S₂.f = S₁.f ≫ τ₂)
(comm₂₃ : τ₂ ≫ S₂.g = S₁.g ≫ τ₃) : S₁ ⟶ S₂ := ⟨τ₁, τ₂, τ₃, comm₁₂, comm₂₃⟩
@[simp] lemma id_τ₁ : Hom.τ₁ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_τ₂ : Hom.τ₂ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_τ₃ : Hom.τ₃ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[reassoc] lemma comp_τ₁ (φ₁₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂₃ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
(φ₁₂ ≫ φ₂₃).τ₁ = φ₁₂.τ₁ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₁ := rfl
@[reassoc] lemma comp_τ₂ (φ₁₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂₃ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
(φ₁₂ ≫ φ₂₃).τ₂ = φ₁₂.τ₂ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₂ := rfl
@[reassoc] lemma comp_τ₃ (φ₁₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂₃ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
(φ₁₂ ≫ φ₂₃).τ₃ = φ₁₂.τ₃ ≫ φ₂₃.τ₃ := rfl
attribute [simp] comp_τ₁ comp_τ₂ comp_τ₃
instance : Zero (S₁ ⟶ S₂) := ⟨{ τ₁ := 0, τ₂ := 0, τ₃ := 0 }⟩
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp] lemma zero_τ₁ : Hom.τ₁ (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_τ₂ : Hom.τ₂ (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_τ₃ : Hom.τ₃ (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 := rfl
variable {S₁ S₂}
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (ShortComplex C) where
/-- The first projection functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def π₁ : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.X₁
map f := f.τ₁
/-- The second projection functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def π₂ : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.X₂
map f := f.τ₂
/-- The third projection functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
def π₃ : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.X₃
map f := f.τ₃
instance preservesZeroMorphisms_π₁ : Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms (π₁ : _ ⥤ C) where
instance preservesZeroMorphisms_π₂ : Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms (π₂ : _ ⥤ C) where
instance preservesZeroMorphisms_π₃ : Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms (π₃ : _ ⥤ C) where
instance (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.τ₁ := (inferInstance : IsIso (π₁.mapIso (asIso f)).hom)
instance (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.τ₂ := (inferInstance : IsIso (π₂.mapIso (asIso f)).hom)
instance (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.τ₃ := (inferInstance : IsIso (π₃.mapIso (asIso f)).hom)
/-- The natural transformation `π₁ ⟶ π₂` induced by `S.f` for all `S : ShortComplex C`. -/
@[simps] def π₁Toπ₂ : (π₁ : _ ⥤ C) ⟶ π₂ where
app S := S.f
/-- The natural transformation `π₂ ⟶ π₃` induced by `S.g` for all `S : ShortComplex C`. -/
@[simps] def π₂Toπ₃ : (π₂ : _ ⥤ C) ⟶ π₃ where
app S := S.g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π₁Toπ₂_comp_π₂Toπ₃ : (π₁Toπ₂ : (_ : _ ⥤ C) ⟶ _) ≫ π₂Toπ₃ = 0 := by aesop_cat
variable {D}
variable [HasZeroMorphisms D]
|
/-- The short complex in `D` obtained by applying a functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Basic.lean | 162 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Absolute values in linear ordered rings.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_zpow (n : ℤ) (a : α) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ |n| := by
obtain n0 | n0 := le_total 0 n
· obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le n0
simp only [mabs_pow, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
· obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (neg_nonneg.2 n0)
rw [← mabs_inv, ← zpow_neg, ← abs_neg, h, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, zpow_natCast]
exact mabs_pow m _
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
lemma odd_abs [LinearOrder α] [Ring α] {a : α} : Odd (abs a) ↔ Odd a := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, odd_neg]
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma abs_one : |(1 : α)| = 1 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_one
lemma abs_two : |(2 : α)| = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma abs_mul (a b : α) : |a * b| = |a| * |b| := by
rw [abs_eq (mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b))]
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha <;> rcases le_total b 0 with hb | hb <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, true_or, or_true, eq_self_iff_true, neg_mul,
mul_neg, neg_neg, *]
/-- `abs` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
def absHom : α →*₀ α where
toFun := abs
map_zero' := abs_zero
map_one' := abs_one
map_mul' := abs_mul
@[simp]
lemma abs_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a ^ n| = |a| ^ n := (absHom.toMonoidHom : α →* α).map_pow _ _
lemma pow_abs (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a| ^ n = |a ^ n| := (abs_pow a n).symm
lemma Even.pow_abs (hn : Even n) (a : α) : |a| ^ n = a ^ n := by
rw [← abs_pow, abs_eq_self]; exact hn.pow_nonneg _
lemma abs_neg_one_pow (n : ℕ) : |(-1 : α) ^ n| = 1 := by rw [← pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
lemma abs_pow_eq_one (a : α) (h : n ≠ 0) : |a ^ n| = 1 ↔ |a| = 1 := by
convert pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) zero_le_one h
exacts [(pow_abs _ _).symm, (one_pow _).symm]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma abs_mul_abs_self (a : α) : |a| * |a| = a * a :=
abs_by_cases (fun x => x * x = a * a) rfl (neg_mul_neg a a)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_self (a : α) : |a * a| = a * a := by rw [abs_mul, abs_mul_abs_self]
lemma abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq : |a| = |b| ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact (mul_self_inj (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)).symm
lemma abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt : |a| < |b| ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_iff_mul_self_le : |a| ≤ |b| ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one : |a| ≤ 1 ↔ a * a ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [abs_one, one_mul] using abs_le_iff_mul_self_le (a := a) (b := 1)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma sq_abs (a : α) : |a| ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_abs_self a
lemma abs_sq (x : α) : |x ^ 2| = x ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_self x
lemma sq_lt_sq : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 ↔ |a| < |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_lt_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_lt_sq' (h1 : -b < a) (h2 : a < b) : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
sq_lt_sq.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (abs_lt.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma sq_le_sq : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 ↔ |a| ≤ |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_le_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_le_sq' (h1 : -b ≤ a) (h2 : a ≤ b) : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (le_trans (abs_le.mpr ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| < b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_lt_sq]
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b < a ∧ a < b :=
abs_lt.1 <| abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| ≤ b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_le_sq]
theorem le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_abs_self a |>.trans <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq' (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b :=
abs_le.1 <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs (a b : α) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ |a| = |b| := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, sq_le_sq]
@[simp] lemma sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 ≤ 1 ↔ |a| ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma sq_lt_one_iff_abs_lt_one (a : α) : a ^ 2 < 1 ↔ |a| < 1 := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := a) (b := 1)
@[simp] lemma one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs (a : α) : 1 ≤ a ^ 2 ↔ 1 ≤ |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_le_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
@[simp] lemma one_lt_sq_iff_one_lt_abs (a : α) : 1 < a ^ 2 ↔ 1 < |a| := by
simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using sq_lt_sq (a := 1) (b := a)
lemma exists_abs_lt {α : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(a : α) : ∃ b > 0, |a| < b :=
⟨|a| + 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one <| by simp, lt_add_one |a|⟩
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (a b : α) (n : ℕ)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
theorem abs_sub_sq (a b : α) : |a - b| * |a - b| = a * a + b * b - (1 + 1) * a * b := by
rw [abs_mul_abs_self]
simp only [mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_one, mul_neg,
neg_add_rev, neg_neg, add_assoc]
lemma abs_unit_intCast (a : ℤˣ) : |((a : ℤ) : α)| = 1 := by
cases Int.units_eq_one_or a <;> simp_all
private def geomSum : ℕ → α
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => a * geomSum n + b ^ (n + 1)
private theorem abs_geomSum_le : |geomSum a b n| ≤ (n + 1) * max |a| |b| ^ n := by
induction n with | zero => simp [geomSum] | succ n ih => ?_
refine (abs_add_le ..).trans ?_
rw [abs_mul, abs_pow, Nat.cast_succ, add_one_mul]
refine add_le_add ?_ (pow_le_pow_left₀ (abs_nonneg _) le_sup_right _)
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm |a|]
exact mul_le_mul ih le_sup_left (abs_nonneg _) (mul_nonneg
(@Nat.cast_succ α .. ▸ Nat.cast_nonneg _) <| pow_nonneg ((abs_nonneg _).trans le_sup_left) _)
omit [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
private theorem pow_sub_pow_eq_sub_mul_geomSum :
a ^ (n + 1) - b ^ (n + 1) = (a - b) * geomSum a b n := by
induction n with | zero => simp [geomSum] | succ n ih => ?_
rw [geomSum, mul_add, mul_comm a, ← mul_assoc, ← ih,
sub_mul, sub_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ', mul_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem abs_pow_sub_pow_le : |a ^ n - b ^ n| ≤ |a - b| * n * max |a| |b| ^ (n - 1) := by
obtain _ | n := n; · simp
rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel, pow_sub_pow_eq_sub_mul_geomSum, abs_mul, mul_assoc, Nat.cast_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_geomSum_le ..) (abs_nonneg _)
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem abs_dvd (a b : α) : |a| ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, neg_dvd]
theorem abs_dvd_self (a : α) : |a| ∣ a :=
(abs_dvd a a).mpr (dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem dvd_abs (a b : α) : a ∣ |b| ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases abs_choice b with h | h <;> simp only [h, dvd_neg]
theorem self_dvd_abs (a : α) : a ∣ |a| :=
(dvd_abs a a).mpr (dvd_refl a)
theorem abs_dvd_abs (a b : α) : |a| ∣ |b| ↔ a ∣ b :=
(abs_dvd _ _).trans (dvd_abs _ _)
end
open Nat
section LinearOrderedRing
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n :=
match n.even_xor_odd with
| .inl hne => by simp only [*, and_true, ← abs_eq_abs,
← pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b) hn, hne.1.pow_abs]
| .inr hn => by simp [hn, (hn.1.strictMono_pow (R := R)).injective.eq_iff]
lemma pow_eq_pow_iff_cases : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn <;> simp [pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero, *]
lemma pow_eq_one_iff_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ∧ Even n := by
simp [← pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero hn]
lemma pow_eq_one_iff_cases : a ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ∧ Even n := by
simp [← pow_eq_pow_iff_cases]
lemma pow_eq_neg_pow_iff (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ^ n = -b ^ n ↔ a = -b ∧ Odd n :=
match n.even_or_odd with
| .inl he =>
suffices a ^ n > -b ^ n by simpa [he, not_odd_iff_even.2 he] using this.ne'
lt_of_lt_of_le (by simp [he.pow_pos hb]) (he.pow_nonneg _)
| .inr ho => by
simp only [ho, and_true, ← ho.neg_pow, (ho.strictMono_pow (R := R)).injective.eq_iff]
lemma pow_eq_neg_one_iff : a ^ n = -1 ↔ a = -1 ∧ Odd n := by
simpa using pow_eq_neg_pow_iff (R := R) one_ne_zero
end LinearOrderedRing
variable {m n a : ℕ}
/-- If `a` is even, then `n` is odd iff `n % a` is odd. -/
lemma Odd.mod_even_iff (ha : Even a) : Odd (n % a) ↔ Odd n :=
((even_sub' <| mod_le n a).mp <|
even_iff_two_dvd.mpr <| (even_iff_two_dvd.mp ha).trans <| dvd_sub_mod n).symm
/-- If `a` is even, then `n` is even iff `n % a` is even. -/
lemma Even.mod_even_iff (ha : Even a) : Even (n % a) ↔ Even n :=
((even_sub <| mod_le n a).mp <|
even_iff_two_dvd.mpr <| (even_iff_two_dvd.mp ha).trans <| dvd_sub_mod n).symm
/-- If `n` is odd and `a` is even, then `n % a` is odd. -/
lemma Odd.mod_even (hn : Odd n) (ha : Even a) : Odd (n % a) := (Odd.mod_even_iff ha).mpr hn
/-- If `n` is even and `a` is even, then `n % a` is even. -/
lemma Even.mod_even (hn : Even n) (ha : Even a) : Even (n % a) :=
(Even.mod_even_iff ha).mpr hn
lemma Odd.of_dvd_nat (hn : Odd n) (hm : m ∣ n) : Odd m :=
not_even_iff_odd.1 <| mt hm.even (not_even_iff_odd.2 hn)
/-- `2` is not a factor of an odd natural number. -/
lemma Odd.ne_two_of_dvd_nat {m n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) (hm : m ∣ n) : m ≠ 2 := by
rintro rfl
exact absurd (hn.of_dvd_nat hm) (by decide)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Abs.lean | 275 | 278 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Alena Gusakov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BitIndices
import Mathlib.Order.SupClosed
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Colexigraphic order
We define the colex order for finite sets, and give a couple of important lemmas and properties
relating to it.
The colex ordering likes to avoid large values: If the biggest element of `t` is bigger than all
elements of `s`, then `s < t`.
In the special case of `ℕ`, it can be thought of as the "binary" ordering. That is, order `s` based
on $∑_{i ∈ s} 2^i$. It's defined here on `Finset α` for any linear order `α`.
In the context of the Kruskal-Katona theorem, we are interested in how colex behaves for sets of a
fixed size. For example, for size 3, the colex order on ℕ starts
`012, 013, 023, 123, 014, 024, 124, 034, 134, 234, ...`
## Main statements
* Colex order properties - linearity, decidability and so on.
* `Finset.Colex.forall_lt_mono`: if `s < t` in colex, and everything in `t` is `< a`, then
everything in `s` is `< a`. This confirms the idea that an enumeration under colex will exhaust
all sets using elements `< a` before allowing `a` to be included.
* `Finset.toColex_image_le_toColex_image`: Strictly monotone functions preserve colex.
* `Finset.geomSum_le_geomSum_iff_toColex_le_toColex`: Colex for α = ℕ is the same as binary.
This also proves binary expansions are unique.
## See also
Related files are:
* `Data.List.Lex`: Lexicographic order on lists.
* `Data.Pi.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `Πₗ i, α i`.
* `Data.PSigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ' i, α i`.
* `Data.Sigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ i, α i`.
* `Data.Prod.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `α × β`.
## TODO
* Generalise `Colex.initSeg` so that it applies to `ℕ`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
colex, colexicographic, binary
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-- Type synonym of `Finset α` equipped with the colexicographic order rather than the inclusion
order. -/
@[ext]
structure Colex (α) where
/-- `toColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset α` and `Finset.Colex α`. -/
toColex ::
/-- `ofColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset.Colex α` and `Finset α`. -/
(ofColex : Finset α)
-- TODO: Why can't we export?
--export Colex (toColex)
open Colex
instance : Inhabited (Colex α) := ⟨⟨∅⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma toColex_ofColex (s : Colex α) : toColex (ofColex s) = s := rfl
lemma ofColex_toColex (s : Finset α) : ofColex (toColex s) = s := rfl
lemma toColex_inj {s t : Finset α} : toColex s = toColex t ↔ s = t := by simp
@[simp]
lemma ofColex_inj {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s = ofColex t ↔ s = t := by cases s; cases t; simp
lemma toColex_ne_toColex {s t : Finset α} : toColex s ≠ toColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma ofColex_ne_ofColex {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s ≠ ofColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma toColex_injective : Injective (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) := fun _ _ ↦ toColex_inj.1
lemma ofColex_injective : Injective (ofColex : Colex α → Finset α) := fun _ _ ↦ ofColex_inj.1
namespace Colex
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {f : α → β} {𝒜 𝒜₁ 𝒜₂ : Finset (Finset α)}
{s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
instance instLE : LE (Colex α) where
le s t := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b
-- TODO: This lemma is weirdly useful given how strange its statement is.
-- Is there a nicer statement? Should this lemma be made public?
private lemma trans_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (htu : toColex t ≤ toColex u)
(has : a ∈ s) (hat : a ∉ t) : ∃ b, b ∈ u ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
classical
let s' : Finset α := {b ∈ s | b ∉ t ∧ a ≤ b}
have ⟨b, hb, hbmax⟩ := exists_maximal s' ⟨a, by simp [s', has, hat]⟩
simp only [s', mem_filter, and_imp] at hb hbmax
have ⟨c, hct, hcs, hbc⟩ := hst hb.1 hb.2.1
by_cases hcu : c ∈ u
· exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hb.2.2.trans hbc⟩
have ⟨d, hdu, hdt, hcd⟩ := htu hct hcu
have had : a ≤ d := hb.2.2.trans <| hbc.trans hcd
refine ⟨d, hdu, fun hds ↦ ?_, had⟩
exact hbmax d hds hdt had <| hbc.trans_lt <| hcd.lt_of_ne <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hct hdt
private lemma antisymm_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (hts : toColex t ≤ toColex s) : s ⊆ t := by
intro a has
by_contra! hat
have ⟨_b, hb₁, hb₂, _⟩ := trans_aux hst hts has hat
exact hb₂ hb₁
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Colex α) where
le_refl _ _ ha ha' := (ha' ha).elim
le_antisymm _ _ hst hts := Colex.ext <| (antisymm_aux hst hts).antisymm (antisymm_aux hts hst)
le_trans s t u hst htu a has hau := by
by_cases hat : a ∈ ofColex t
· have ⟨b, hbu, hbt, hab⟩ := htu hat hau
by_cases hbs : b ∈ ofColex s
· have ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hbc⟩ := trans_aux hst htu hbs hbt
exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hab.trans hbc⟩
· exact ⟨b, hbu, hbs, hab⟩
· exact trans_aux hst htu has hat
lemma le_def {s t : Colex α} :
s ≤ t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_le_toColex :
toColex s ≤ toColex t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_lt_toColex :
toColex s < toColex t ↔ s ≠ t ∧ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, toColex_le_toColex, and_comm]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_mono : Monotone (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
fun _s _t hst _a has hat ↦ (hat <| hst has).elim
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_strictMono : StrictMono (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
toColex_mono.strictMono_of_injective toColex_injective
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_le_toColex_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : toColex s ≤ toColex t := toColex_mono h
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_lt_toColex_of_ssubset (h : s ⊂ t) : toColex s < toColex t := toColex_strictMono h
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Colex α) where
bot := toColex ∅
bot_le s a ha := by cases ha
@[simp] lemma toColex_empty : toColex (∅ : Finset α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofColex_bot : ofColex (⊥ : Colex α) = ∅ := rfl
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_le_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b ≤ a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a := by
rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans <| ht _ hct
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_lt_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b < a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b < a := by
| rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans_lt <| ht _ hct
/-- `s ≤ {a}` in colex iff all elements of `s` are strictly less than `a`, except possibly `a` in
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Colex.lean | 181 | 187 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Domain
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Coeff
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
/-!
# The derivative map on polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.derivative`: The formal derivative of polynomials, expressed as a linear map.
* `Polynomial.derivativeFinsupp`: Iterated derivatives as a finite support function.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
open scoped Nat
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `derivative p` is the formal derivative of the polynomial `p` -/
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial_succ (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial (n + 1) a) = monomial n (a * (n + 1)) := by
rw [derivative_monomial, add_tsub_cancel_right, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
derivative (X ^ (n + 1) : R[X]) = C (n + 1 : R) * X ^ n := by
simp [derivative_X_pow]
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by simp [derivative_apply]
theorem derivative_of_natDegree_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree = 0) : derivative p = 0 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hp, derivative_C]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X : derivative (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
(derivative_monomial _ _).trans <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_one : derivative (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem derivative_add {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f + g) = derivative f + derivative g :=
derivative.map_add f g
theorem derivative_X_add_C (c : R) : derivative (X + C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
theorem derivative_sum {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative (f b) :=
map_sum ..
theorem iterate_derivative_sum (k : ℕ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
derivative^[k] (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative^[k] (f b) := by
simp_rw [← Module.End.pow_apply, map_sum]
theorem derivative_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S)
(p : R[X]) : derivative (s • p) = s • derivative p :=
derivative.map_smul_of_tower s p
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] [IsScalarTower S R R]
(s : S) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) : derivative^[k] (s • p) = s • derivative^[k] p := by
induction k generalizing p with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (C a * p) = C a * derivative^[k] p := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_C_mul, iterate_derivative_smul]
theorem derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) :
derivative (C a * p) = C a * derivative p := iterate_derivative_C_mul _ _ 1
theorem of_mem_support_derivative {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ p.derivative.support) :
n + 1 ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.2 fun h1 : p.coeff (n + 1) = 0 =>
mem_support_iff.1 h <| show p.derivative.coeff n = 0 by rw [coeff_derivative, h1, zero_mul]
theorem degree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.derivative.degree < p.degree :=
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 <| mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp).2 fun n hp =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.lt_succ_self) <|
Finset.le_sup <| of_mem_support_derivative hp
theorem degree_derivative_le {p : R[X]} : p.derivative.degree ≤ p.degree :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p = 0 then le_of_eq <| by rw [H, derivative_zero] else (degree_derivative_lt H).le
theorem natDegree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
p.derivative.natDegree < p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne (derivative p) 0 with hp' | hp'
· rw [hp', Polynomial.natDegree_zero]
exact hp.bot_lt
· rw [natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hp']
exact degree_derivative_lt fun h => hp (h.symm ▸ natDegree_zero)
theorem natDegree_derivative_le (p : R[X]) : p.derivative.natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - 1 := by
by_cases p0 : p.natDegree = 0
· simp [p0, derivative_of_natDegree_zero]
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (natDegree_derivative_lt p0)
theorem natDegree_iterate_derivative (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ d hd =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Nat.sub_succ']
exact (natDegree_derivative_le _).trans <| Nat.sub_le_sub_right hd 1
@[simp]
theorem derivative_natCast {n : ℕ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← map_natCast C n]
exact derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem derivative_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
derivative (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_natCast
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {x : ℕ} (hx : p.natDegree < x) :
Polynomial.derivative^[x] p = 0 := by
induction' h : p.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with _ ih generalizing p x
subst h
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_of_gt hx).ne'
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply]
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [derivative_of_natDegree_zero hp, iterate_derivative_zero]
have := natDegree_derivative_lt hp
exact ih _ this (this.trans_le <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ hx) rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (C a : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| (natDegree_C _).trans_lt h
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_one {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_C h
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_X {k} (h : 1 < k) : derivative^[k] (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| natDegree_X_le.trans_lt h
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]}
(h : derivative f = 0) : f.natDegree = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with (rfl | hf)
· exact natDegree_zero
rw [natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
by_contra! f_nat_degree_pos
rw [← natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos] at f_nat_degree_pos
let m := f.natDegree - 1
have hm : m + 1 = f.natDegree := tsub_add_cancel_of_le f_nat_degree_pos
have h2 := coeff_derivative f m
rw [Polynomial.ext_iff] at h
rw [h m, coeff_zero, ← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', eq_comm, smul_eq_zero] at h2
replace h2 := h2.resolve_left m.succ_ne_zero
rw [hm, ← leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h2
exact hf h2
theorem eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]} (h : derivative f = 0) :
f = C (f.coeff 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero <| natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero h
@[simp]
theorem derivative_mul {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f * g) = derivative f * g + f * derivative g := by
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add => simp only [add_mul, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| monomial m a => ?_
induction g using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add => simp only [mul_add, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| monomial n b => ?_
simp only [monomial_mul_monomial, derivative_monomial]
simp only [mul_assoc, (Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, map_add]
cases m with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => simp only [add_zero, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n 1]
theorem derivative_eval (p : R[X]) (x : R) :
p.derivative.eval x = p.sum fun n a => a * n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
simp_rw [derivative_apply, eval_sum, eval_mul_X_pow, eval_C]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivative (p.map f) = p.derivative.map f := by
let n := max p.natDegree (map f p).natDegree
rw [derivative_apply, derivative_apply]
rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
on_goal 1 => rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
· simp only [Polynomial.map_sum, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_C, map_mul, coeff_map,
map_natCast, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
all_goals intro n; rw [zero_mul, C_0, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative^[k] (p.map f) = (Polynomial.derivative^[k] p).map f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp only [ih, Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.derivative_map, Function.comp_apply]
theorem derivative_natCast_mul {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative f := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_natCast_mul {n k : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative^[k] f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing f <;> simp [*]
theorem mem_support_derivative [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
n ∈ (derivative p).support ↔ n + 1 ∈ p.support := by
suffices ¬p.coeff (n + 1) * (n + 1 : ℕ) = 0 ↔ coeff p (n + 1) ≠ 0 by
simpa only [mem_support_iff, coeff_derivative, Ne, Nat.cast_succ]
rw [← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_eq_zero]
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
@[simp]
theorem degree_derivative_eq [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (hp : 0 < natDegree p) :
degree (derivative p) = (natDegree p - 1 : ℕ) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [derivative_apply]
apply le_trans (degree_sum_le _ _) (Finset.sup_le _)
intro n hn
apply le_trans (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _) (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (tsub_le_tsub_right _ _))
apply le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn
· refine le_sup ?_
rw [mem_support_derivative, tsub_add_cancel_of_le, mem_support_iff]
· rw [coeff_natDegree, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
intro h
rw [h, natDegree_zero] at hp
exact hp.false
exact hp
theorem coeff_iterate_derivative {k} (p : R[X]) (m : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).coeff m = (m + k).descFactorial k • p.coeff (m + k) := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
calc
(derivative^[k + 1] p).coeff m
_ = Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k • p.coeff (m + k.succ) * (m + 1) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', coeff_derivative, ih m.succ, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_succ]
_ = ((m + 1) * Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k) • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_smul]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m.succ + k) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.succ_add, Nat.descFactorial_succ, add_tsub_cancel_right]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m + k.succ) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ]
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_sum (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] p =
∑ x ∈ (derivative^[k] p).support, C ((x + k).descFactorial k • p.coeff (x + k)) * X ^ x := by
conv_lhs => rw [(derivative^[k] p).as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ ?_
rw [coeff_iterate_derivative, Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_factorial_smul_sum (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] p = k ! •
∑ x ∈ (derivative^[k] p).support, C ((x + k).choose k • p.coeff (x + k)) * X ^ x := by
conv_lhs => rw [iterate_derivative_eq_sum]
rw [smul_sum]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ ?_
rw [← smul_mul_assoc, smul_C, smul_smul, Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
theorem iterate_derivative_mul {n} (p q : R[X]) :
derivative^[n] (p * q) =
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp [Finset.range]
| succ n IH =>
calc
derivative^[n + 1] (p * q) =
derivative (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', IH]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k + 1] p * derivative^[k] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) := by
simp_rw [derivative_sum, derivative_smul, derivative_mul, Function.iterate_succ_apply',
smul_add, sum_add_distrib]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) :=
?_
_ = ((∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
rw [add_comm, add_assoc]
_ = (∑ i ∈ range n.succ,
(n + 1).choose (i + 1) • (derivative^[n + 1 - (i + 1)] p * derivative^[i + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
simp_rw [Nat.choose_succ_succ, Nat.succ_sub_succ, add_smul, sum_add_distrib]
_ = ∑ k ∈ range n.succ.succ,
n.succ.choose k • (derivative^[n.succ - k] p * derivative^[k] q) := by
rw [sum_range_succ' _ n.succ, Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
congr
refine (sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) ?_ ?_)
· rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.choose_succ_self, zero_smul, add_zero]
refine sum_congr rfl fun k hk => ?_
rw [mem_range] at hk
congr
omega
· rw [Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
/--
Iterated derivatives as a finite support function.
-/
@[simps! apply_toFun]
noncomputable def derivativeFinsupp : R[X] →ₗ[R] ℕ →₀ R[X] where
toFun p := .onFinset (range (p.natDegree + 1)) (derivative^[·] p) fun i ↦ by
contrapose; simp_all [iterate_derivative_eq_zero, Nat.succ_le]
map_add' _ _ := by ext; simp
map_smul' _ _ := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem support_derivativeFinsupp_subset_range {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : p.natDegree < n) :
(derivativeFinsupp p).support ⊆ range n := by
dsimp [derivativeFinsupp]
exact Finsupp.support_onFinset_subset.trans (Finset.range_subset.mpr h)
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_C (r : R) : derivativeFinsupp (C r : R[X]) = .single 0 (C r) := by
ext i : 1
match i with
| 0 => simp
| i + 1 => simp
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_one : derivativeFinsupp (1 : R[X]) = .single 0 1 := by
simpa using derivativeFinsupp_C (1 : R)
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_X : derivativeFinsupp (X : R[X]) = .single 0 X + .single 1 1 := by
ext i : 1
match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| (n + 2) => simp
theorem derivativeFinsupp_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivativeFinsupp (p.map f) = (derivativeFinsupp p).mapRange (·.map f) (by simp) := by
ext i : 1
simp
theorem derivativeFinsupp_derivative (p : R[X]) :
derivativeFinsupp (derivative p) =
(derivativeFinsupp p).comapDomain Nat.succ Nat.succ_injective.injOn := by
ext i : 1
simp
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem derivative_pow_succ (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ (n + 1)) = C (n + 1 : R) * p ^ n * derivative p :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n ih => by
rw [pow_succ, derivative_mul, ih, Nat.add_one, mul_right_comm, C_add,
add_mul, add_mul, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_1, one_mul]; simp [add_mul]
theorem derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ n) = C (n : R) * p ^ (n - 1) * derivative p :=
Nat.casesOn n (by rw [pow_zero, derivative_one, Nat.cast_zero, C_0, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun n =>
by rw [p.derivative_pow_succ n, Nat.add_one_sub_one, n.cast_succ]
theorem derivative_sq (p : R[X]) : derivative (p ^ 2) = C 2 * p * derivative p := by
rw [derivative_pow_succ, Nat.cast_one, one_add_one_eq_two, pow_one]
theorem pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - 1) ∣ derivative p := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := dvd
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_pow]
exact (((dvd_mul_left _ _).mul_right _).mul_right _).add ((pow_dvd_pow q n.pred_le).mul_right _)
theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ)
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] p := by
induction m generalizing p with
| zero => simpa
| succ m ih =>
rw [Nat.sub_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
exact pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (ih dvd)
theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n m : ℕ) :
p ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] (p ^ n) := pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd m dvd_rfl
theorem dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (c : R) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(n : R) ∣ eval c (derivative^[m] (f ^ n)) := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hm
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply, derivative_pow, mul_assoc, C_eq_natCast,
iterate_derivative_natCast_mul, eval_mul, eval_natCast]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul (n k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = ↑(Nat.descFactorial n k : R[X]) * X ^ (n - k) := by
induction k with
| zero =>
rw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, tsub_zero, Nat.descFactorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, one_mul]
| succ k ih =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', ih, derivative_natCast_mul, derivative_X_pow, C_eq_natCast,
Nat.descFactorial_succ, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.cast_mul]
simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul (n k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (Nat.descFactorial n k : R) * X ^ (n - k) := by
rw [iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_natCast_mul n k, C_eq_natCast]
theorem iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_smul (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (X ^ n : R[X]) = (Nat.descFactorial n k : R) • X ^ (n - k) := by
rw [iterate_derivative_X_pow_eq_C_mul n k, smul_eq_C_mul]
theorem derivative_X_add_C_pow (c : R) (m : ℕ) :
derivative ((X + C c) ^ m) = C (m : R) * (X + C c) ^ (m - 1) := by
rw [derivative_pow, derivative_X_add_C, mul_one]
theorem derivative_X_add_C_sq (c : R) : derivative ((X + C c) ^ 2) = C 2 * (X + C c) := by
rw [derivative_sq, derivative_X_add_C, mul_one]
theorem iterate_derivative_X_add_pow (n k : ℕ) (c : R) :
derivative^[k] ((X + C c) ^ n) = Nat.descFactorial n k • (X + C c) ^ (n - k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k IH =>
rw [Nat.sub_succ', Function.iterate_succ_apply', IH, derivative_smul,
derivative_X_add_C_pow, map_natCast, Nat.descFactorial_succ, nsmul_eq_mul, nsmul_eq_mul,
Nat.cast_mul]
ring
theorem derivative_comp (p q : R[X]) :
derivative (p.comp q) = derivative q * p.derivative.comp q := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on'
· simp [*, mul_add]
· simp only [derivative_pow, derivative_mul, monomial_comp, derivative_monomial, derivative_C,
zero_mul, C_eq_natCast, zero_add, RingHom.map_mul]
ring
/-- Chain rule for formal derivative of polynomials. -/
theorem derivative_eval₂_C (p q : R[X]) :
derivative (p.eval₂ C q) = p.derivative.eval₂ C q * derivative q :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun r => by rw [eval₂_C, derivative_C, eval₂_zero, zero_mul])
(fun p₁ p₂ ih₁ ih₂ => by
rw [eval₂_add, derivative_add, ih₁, ih₂, derivative_add, eval₂_add, add_mul])
fun n r ih => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, eval₂_mul, eval₂_X, derivative_mul, ih, @derivative_mul _ _ _ X,
derivative_X, mul_one, eval₂_add, @eval₂_mul _ _ _ _ X, eval₂_X, add_mul, mul_right_comm]
theorem derivative_prod [DecidableEq ι] {s : Multiset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (Multiset.map f s).prod =
(Multiset.map (fun i => (Multiset.map f (s.erase i)).prod * derivative (f i)) s).sum := by
refine Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s h => ?_
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, derivative_mul, Multiset.map_cons _ i s,
Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.erase_cons_head, mul_comm (derivative (f i))]
congr
rw [h, ← AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft, (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft (f i)).map_multiset_sum _,
AddMonoidHom.coe_mulLeft]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Multiset.map_map]
refine congr_arg _ (Multiset.map_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_)
rw [← mul_assoc, ← Multiset.prod_cons, ← Multiset.map_cons]
by_cases hij : i = j
· simp [hij, ← Multiset.prod_cons, ← Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.cons_erase hj]
· simp [hij]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_neg (f : R[X]) : derivative (-f) = -derivative f :=
LinearMap.map_neg derivative f
theorem iterate_derivative_neg {f : R[X]} {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (-f) = -derivative^[k] f :=
iterate_map_neg derivative k f
@[simp]
theorem derivative_sub {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f - g) = derivative f - derivative g :=
LinearMap.map_sub derivative f g
theorem derivative_X_sub_C (c : R) : derivative (X - C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_C, sub_zero]
theorem iterate_derivative_sub {k : ℕ} {f g : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] (f - g) = derivative^[k] f - derivative^[k] g :=
iterate_map_sub derivative k f g
@[simp]
theorem derivative_intCast {n : ℤ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast n]
exact derivative_C
theorem derivative_intCast_mul {n : ℤ} {f : R[X]} : derivative ((n : R[X]) * f) =
n * derivative f := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_intCast_mul {n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative^[k] f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing f <;> simp [*]
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem derivative_comp_one_sub_X (p : R[X]) :
derivative (p.comp (1 - X)) = -p.derivative.comp (1 - X) := by simp [derivative_comp]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_comp_one_sub_X (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (p.comp (1 - X)) = (-1) ^ k * (derivative^[k] p).comp (1 - X) := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp [ih (derivative p), iterate_derivative_neg, derivative_comp, pow_succ]
theorem eval_multiset_prod_X_sub_C_derivative [DecidableEq R]
{S : Multiset R} {r : R} (hr : r ∈ S) :
eval r (derivative (Multiset.map (fun a => X - C a) S).prod) =
(Multiset.map (fun a => r - a) (S.erase r)).prod := by
nth_rw 1 [← Multiset.cons_erase hr]
have := (evalRingHom r).map_multiset_prod (Multiset.map (fun a => X - C a) (S.erase r))
simpa using this
theorem derivative_X_sub_C_pow (c : R) (m : ℕ) :
derivative ((X - C c) ^ m) = C (m : R) * (X - C c) ^ (m - 1) := by
| rw [derivative_pow, derivative_X_sub_C, mul_one]
theorem derivative_X_sub_C_sq (c : R) : derivative ((X - C c) ^ 2) = C 2 * (X - C c) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 620 | 622 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry
/-!
# Tensor product of an indexed family of modules over commutative semirings
We define the tensor product of an indexed family `s : ι → Type*` of modules over commutative
semirings. We denote this space by `⨂[R] i, s i` and define it as `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`
quotiented by the appropriate equivalence relation. The treatment follows very closely that of the
binary tensor product in `LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor product
of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `tprod R f` with `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i` over all `i : ι`.
This is bundled as a multilinear map from `Π i, s i` to `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `liftAddHom` constructs an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a
function `φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties.
* `lift φ` with `φ : MultilinearMap R s E` is the corresponding linear map
`(⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E`. This is bundled as a linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.reindex e` re-indexes the components of `⨂[R] i : ι, M` along `e : ι ≃ ι₂`.
* `PiTensorProduct.tmulEquiv` equivalence between a `TensorProduct` of `PiTensorProduct`s and
a single `PiTensorProduct`.
## Notations
* `⨂[R] i, s i` is defined as localized notation in locale `TensorProduct`.
* `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i` with `f : ∀ i, s i` is defined globally as the tensor product of all the `f i`'s.
## Implementation notes
* We define it via `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` with the `R` representing a "hidden" tensor
factor, rather than `FreeAddMonoid (Π i, s i)` to ensure that, if `ι` is an empty type,
the space is isomorphic to the base ring `R`.
* We have not restricted the index type `ι` to be a `Fintype`, as nothing we do here strictly
requires it. However, problems may arise in the case where `ι` is infinite; use at your own
caution.
* Instead of requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `PiTensorProduct` itself, we include it
as an argument in the constructors of the relation. A decidability instance still has to come
from somewhere due to the use of `Function.update`, but this hides it from the downstream user.
See the implementation notes for `MultilinearMap` for an extended discussion of this choice.
## TODO
* Define tensor powers, symmetric subspace, etc.
* API for the various ways `ι` can be split into subsets; connect this with the binary
tensor product.
* Include connection with holors.
* Port more of the API from the binary tensor product over to this case.
## Tags
multilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
open Function
section Semiring
variable {ι ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R₁ R₂ : Type*}
variable {s : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (s i)] [∀ i, Module R (s i)]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommMonoid F]
namespace PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → Prop
| of_zero : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)) 0
| of_zero_scalar : ∀ f : Π i, s i, Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (0, f)) 0
| of_add : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₁) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₂))
(FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
| of_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r', f)) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r + r', f))
| of_smul : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (r' • f i))) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r' * r, f))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor
product of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`. -/
def PiTensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).Quotient
variable {R}
unsuppress_compilation in
/-- This enables the notation `⨂[R] i : ι, s i` for the pi tensor product `PiTensorProduct`,
given an indexed family of types `s : ι → Type*`. -/
scoped[TensorProduct] notation3:100"⨂["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => PiTensorProduct R f) => r
open TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section Module
instance : AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).addMonoid with
add_comm := fun x y ↦
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ ↦
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (⨂[R] i, s i) := ⟨0⟩
variable (R) {s}
/-- `tprodCoeff R r f` with `r : R` and `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i`
over all `i : ι`, multiplied by the coefficient `r`. Note that this is meant as an auxiliary
definition for this file alone, and that one should use `tprod` defined below for most purposes. -/
def tprodCoeff (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) : ⨂[R] i, s i :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)
variable {R}
theorem zero_tprodCoeff (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R 0 f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_scalar _
theorem zero_tprodCoeff' (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (hf : f i = 0) : tprodCoeff R z f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero _ _ i hf
theorem add_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₁) + tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₂) =
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (m₁ + m₂)) :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add _ z f i m₁ m₂)
theorem add_tprodCoeff' (z₁ z₂ : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
tprodCoeff R z₁ f + tprodCoeff R z₂ f = tprodCoeff R (z₁ + z₂) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f)
theorem smul_tprodCoeff_aux [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r * z) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _ _ _
theorem smul_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R₁) [SMul R₁ R]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R R] [SMul R₁ (s i)] [IsScalarTower R₁ R (s i)] :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := by
have h₁ : r • z = r • (1 : R) * z := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
have h₂ : r • f i = (r • (1 : R)) • f i := (smul_one_smul _ _ _).symm
rw [h₁, h₂]
exact smul_tprodCoeff_aux z f i _
/-- Construct an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a function
`φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties. -/
def liftAddHom (φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F)
(C0 : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), φ (r, f) = 0)
(C0' : ∀ f : Π i, s i, φ (0, f) = 0)
(C_add : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
φ (r, update f i m₁) + φ (r, update f i m₂) = φ (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
(C_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i), φ (r, f) + φ (r', f) = φ (r + r', f))
(C_smul : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
φ (r, update f i (r' • f i)) = φ (r' * r, f)) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →+ F :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift φ) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy ↦
match hxy with
| Eqv.of_zero r' f i hf =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0 r' f i hf]
| Eqv.of_zero_scalar f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0']
| Eqv.of_add inst z f i m₁ m₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_add inst]
| Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C_add_scalar]
| Eqv.of_smul inst z f i r' =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_smul inst]
| Eqv.add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, add_comm]
/-- Induct using `tprodCoeff` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(tprodCoeff : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (tprodCoeff R r f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
have C0 : motive 0 := by
have h₁ := tprodCoeff 0 0
rwa [zero_tprodCoeff] at h₁
refine AddCon.induction_on z fun x ↦ FreeAddMonoid.recOn x C0 ?_
simp_rw [AddCon.coe_add]
refine fun f y ih ↦ add _ _ ?_ ih
convert tprodCoeff f.1 f.2
section DistribMulAction
variable [Monoid R₁] [DistribMulAction R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R]
variable [Monoid R₂] [DistribMulAction R₂ R] [SMulCommClass R₂ R R]
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance hasSMul' : SMul R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun r ↦
liftAddHom (fun f : R × Π i, s i ↦ tprodCoeff R (r • f.1) f.2)
(fun r' f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [zero_tprodCoeff' _ f i hf])
(fun f ↦ by simp [zero_tprodCoeff]) (fun r' f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff])
(fun r' r'' f ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff', mul_add]) fun z f i r' ↦ by
simp [smul_tprodCoeff, mul_smul_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.hasSMul'
theorem smul_tprodCoeff' (r : R₁) (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
r • tprodCoeff R z f = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := rfl
protected theorem smul_add (r : R₁) (x y : ⨂[R] i, s i) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
instance distribMulAction' : DistribMulAction R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) where
smul := (· • ·)
smul_add _ _ _ := AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
mul_smul r r' x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r'' f} ↦ by simp [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_smul])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
one_smul x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r f} ↦ by rw [smul_tprodCoeff', one_smul])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]
smul_zero _ := AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
instance smulCommClass' [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_comm])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
instance isScalarTower' [SMul R₁ R₂] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_assoc])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
end DistribMulAction
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance module' [Semiring R₁] [Module R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R] : Module R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ PiTensorProduct.distribMulAction' with
add_smul := fun r r' x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', add_smul, add_tprodCoeff'])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
zero_smul := fun x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', zero_smul, zero_tprodCoeff])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero] }
-- shortcut instances
instance : Module R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.module'
instance : SMulCommClass R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.smulCommClass'
instance : IsScalarTower R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.isScalarTower'
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical `MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)`.
`tprod R fun i => f i` has notation `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i`. -/
def tprod : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i) where
toFun := tprodCoeff R 1
map_update_add' {_ f} i x y := (add_tprodCoeff (1 : R) f i x y).symm
map_update_smul' {_ f} i r x := by
rw [smul_tprodCoeff', ← smul_tprodCoeff (1 : R) _ i, update_idem, update_self]
unsuppress_compilation in
@[inherit_doc tprod]
notation3:100 "⨂ₜ["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => tprod R f) => r
theorem tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one :
⇑(tprod R : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)) = tprodCoeff R 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R z f = z • tprod R f := by
have : z = z • (1 : R) := by simp only [mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
rfl
/-- The image of an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` in the `PiTensorProduct` is
equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries `(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma _root_.FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p =
List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) := by
-- TODO: this is defeq abuse: `p` is not a `List`.
match p with
| [] => rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_nil, List.map_nil, List.sum_nil]; rfl
| x :: ps =>
rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_cons, List.map_cons, List.sum_cons, ← List.singleton_append,
← toPiTensorProduct ps, ← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod]
rfl
/-- The set of lifts of an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i` in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`. -/
def lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set (FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :=
{p | AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p = x}
/-- An element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
if and only if `x` is equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries
`(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma mem_lifts_iff (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
p ∈ lifts x ↔ List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) = x := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct]
/-- Every element of `⨂[R] i, s i` has a lift in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`.
-/
lemma nonempty_lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set.Nonempty (lifts x) := by
existsi @Quotient.out _ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).toSetoid x
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [← AddCon.quot_mk_eq_coe]
erw [Quot.out_eq]
/-- The empty list lifts the element `0` of `⨂[R] i, s i`.
-/
lemma lifts_zero : 0 ∈ lifts (0 : ⨂[R] i, s i) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff]; erw [List.map_nil]; rw [List.sum_nil]
/-- If elements `p,q` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lift elements `x,y` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
respectively, then `p + q` lifts `x + y`.
-/
lemma lifts_add {x y : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p q : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)}
(hp : p ∈ lifts x) (hq : q ∈ lifts y) : p + q ∈ lifts (x + y) := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, AddCon.coe_add]
rw [hp, hq]
/-- If an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`,
and if `a` is an element of `R`, then the list obtained by multiplying the first entry of each
element of `p` by `a` lifts `a • x`.
-/
lemma lifts_smul {x : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)} (h : p ∈ lifts x) (a : R) :
p.map (fun (y : R × Π i, s i) ↦ (a * y.1, y.2)) ∈ lifts (a • x) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff] at h ⊢
rw [← h]
simp [Function.comp_def, mul_smul, List.smul_sum]
/-- Induct using scaled versions of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(smul_tprod : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (r • tprod R f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
simp_rw [← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod] at smul_tprod
exact PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z smul_tprod add
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ₁ φ₂ : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E}
(H : φ₁.compMultilinearMap (tprod R) = φ₂.compMultilinearMap (tprod R)) : φ₁ = φ₂ := by
refine LinearMap.ext ?_
refine fun z ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z ?_ fun {x y} hx hy ↦ by rw [φ₁.map_add, φ₂.map_add, hx, hy]
· intro r f
rw [tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod, φ₁.map_smul, φ₂.map_smul]
apply congr_arg
exact MultilinearMap.congr_fun H f
/-- The pure tensors (i.e. the elements of the image of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`) span
the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tprod_eq_top :
Submodule.span R (Set.range (tprod R)) = (⊤ : Submodule R (⨂[R] i, s i)) :=
Submodule.eq_top_iff'.mpr fun t ↦ t.induction_on
(fun _ _ ↦ Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span (by simp only [Set.mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply])))
(fun _ _ hx hy ↦ Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy)
end Module
section Multilinear
open MultilinearMap
variable {s}
section lift
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `(⨂[R] i, s i) → E` given a
`MultilinearMap R s E` with the property that its composition with the canonical
`MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)` is the given multilinear map. -/
def liftAux (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) : (⨂[R] i, s i) →+ E :=
liftAddHom (fun p : R × Π i, s i ↦ p.1 • φ p.2)
(fun z f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [map_coord_zero φ i hf, smul_zero])
(fun f ↦ by simp_rw [zero_smul])
(fun z f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [← smul_add, φ.map_update_add])
(fun z₁ z₂ f ↦ by rw [← add_smul])
fun z f i r ↦ by simp [φ.map_update_smul, smul_smul, mul_comm]
theorem liftAux_tprod (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) (f : Π i, s i) : liftAux φ (tprod R f) = φ f := by
simp only [liftAux, liftAddHom, tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one, tprodCoeff, AddCon.coe_mk']
-- The end of this proof was very different before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644:
-- rw [FreeAddMonoid.of, FreeAddMonoid.ofList, Equiv.refl_apply, AddCon.lift_coe]
-- dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.lift, FreeAddMonoid.sumAux]
-- show _ • _ = _
-- rw [one_smul]
erw [AddCon.lift_coe]
rw [FreeAddMonoid.of]
dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.ofList]
rw [← one_smul R (φ f)]
erw [Equiv.refl_apply]
convert one_smul R (φ f)
simp
theorem liftAux_tprodCoeff (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
liftAux φ (tprodCoeff R z f) = z • φ f := rfl
theorem liftAux.smul {φ : MultilinearMap R s E} (r : R) (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) :
liftAux φ (r • x) = r • liftAux φ x := by
refine PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x ?_ ?_
· intro z f
rw [smul_tprodCoeff' r z f, liftAux_tprodCoeff, liftAux_tprodCoeff, smul_assoc]
· intro z y ihz ihy
rw [smul_add, (liftAux φ).map_add, ihz, ihy, (liftAux φ).map_add, smul_add]
/-- Constructing a linear map `(⨂[R] i, s i) → E` given a `MultilinearMap R s E` with the
property that its composition with the canonical `MultilinearMap R s E` is
the given multilinear map `φ`. -/
def lift : MultilinearMap R s E ≃ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E where
toFun φ := { liftAux φ with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
invFun φ' := φ'.compMultilinearMap (tprod R)
left_inv φ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap]
right_inv φ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
map_add' φ₁ φ₂ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
map_smul' r φ₂ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
variable {φ : MultilinearMap R s E}
@[simp]
theorem lift.tprod (f : Π i, s i) : lift φ (tprod R f) = φ f :=
liftAux_tprod φ f
theorem lift.unique' {φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E}
(H : φ'.compMultilinearMap (PiTensorProduct.tprod R) = φ) : φ' = lift φ :=
ext <| H.symm ▸ (lift.symm_apply_apply φ).symm
theorem lift.unique {φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E} (H : ∀ f, φ' (PiTensorProduct.tprod R f) = φ f) :
φ' = lift φ :=
lift.unique' (MultilinearMap.ext H)
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm (φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E) : lift.symm φ' = φ'.compMultilinearMap (tprod R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_tprod : lift (tprod R : MultilinearMap R s _) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique' rfl
end lift
section map
variable {t t' : ι → Type*}
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (t i)] [∀ i, Module R (t i)]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (t' i)] [∀ i, Module R (t' i)]
variable (g : Π i, t i →ₗ[R] t' i) (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] t i)
/--
Let `sᵢ` and `tᵢ` be two families of `R`-modules.
Let `f` be a family of `R`-linear maps between `sᵢ` and `tᵢ`, i.e. `f : Πᵢ sᵢ → tᵢ`,
then there is an induced map `⨂ᵢ sᵢ → ⨂ᵢ tᵢ` by `⨂ aᵢ ↦ ⨂ fᵢ aᵢ`.
This is `TensorProduct.map` for an arbitrary family of modules.
-/
def map : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t i :=
lift <| (tprod R).compLinearMap f
@[simp] lemma map_tprod (x : Π i, s i) :
map f (tprod R x) = tprod R fun i ↦ f i (x i) :=
lift.tprod _
-- No lemmas about associativity, because we don't have associativity of `PiTensorProduct` yet.
theorem map_range_eq_span_tprod :
LinearMap.range (map f) =
Submodule.span R {t | ∃ (m : Π i, s i), tprod R (fun i ↦ f i (m i)) = t} := by
rw [← Submodule.map_top, ← span_tprod_eq_top, Submodule.map_span, ← Set.range_comp]
apply congrArg; ext x
simp only [Set.mem_range, comp_apply, map_tprod, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
/-- Given submodules `p i ⊆ s i`, this is the natural map: `⨂[R] i, p i → ⨂[R] i, s i`.
This is `TensorProduct.mapIncl` for an arbitrary family of modules.
-/
@[simp]
def mapIncl (p : Π i, Submodule R (s i)) : (⨂[R] i, p i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, s i :=
map fun (i : ι) ↦ (p i).subtype
theorem map_comp : map (fun (i : ι) ↦ g i ∘ₗ f i) = map g ∘ₗ map f := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
theorem lift_comp_map (h : MultilinearMap R t E) :
lift h ∘ₗ map f = lift (h.compLinearMap f) := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
map_tprod, lift.tprod, MultilinearMap.compLinearMap_apply]
attribute [local ext high] ext
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (fun i ↦ (LinearMap.id : s i →ₗ[R] s i)) = .id := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, LinearMap.id_coe, id_eq]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : map (fun (i : ι) ↦ (1 : s i →ₗ[R] s i)) = 1 :=
map_id
protected theorem map_mul (f₁ f₂ : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) :
map (fun i ↦ f₁ i * f₂ i) = map f₁ * map f₂ :=
map_comp f₁ f₂
/-- Upgrading `PiTensorProduct.map` to a `MonoidHom` when `s = t`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMonoidHom : (Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) →* ((⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, s i) where
toFun := map
map_one' := PiTensorProduct.map_one
map_mul' := PiTensorProduct.map_mul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) (n : ℕ) :
map (f ^ n) = map f ^ n := MonoidHom.map_pow mapMonoidHom _ _
open Function in
private theorem map_add_smul_aux [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x : Π i, s i) (u : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
(fun j ↦ update f i u j (x j)) = update (fun j ↦ (f j) (x j)) i (u (x i)) := by
ext j
exact apply_update (fun i F => F (x i)) f i u j
open Function in
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (u v : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
map (update f i (u + v)) = map (update f i u) + map (update f i v) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, map_add_smul_aux, LinearMap.add_apply,
MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := PiTensorProduct.map_update_add
|
open Function in
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : R) (u : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/PiTensorProduct.lean | 560 | 562 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Outer measures from functions
Given an arbitrary function `m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞` that sends `∅` to `0` we can define an outer
measure on `α` that on `s` is defined to be the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (sᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`sᵢ` that cover `s`. This is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most the given function.
Given an outer measure `m`, the Carathéodory-measurable sets are the sets `s` such that
for all sets `t` we have `m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. This forms a measurable space.
## Main definitions and statements
* `OuterMeasure.boundedBy` is the greatest outer measure that is at most the given function.
If you know that the given function sends `∅` to `0`, then `OuterMeasure.ofFunction` is a
special case.
* `sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen` is a characterization of the infimum of outer measures.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carath%C3%A9odory%27s_criterion>
## Tags
outer measure, Carathéodory-measurable, Carathéodory's criterion
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
section OfFunction
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets satisfying `m ∅ = 0`, there is
a unique maximal outer measure `μ` satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. -/
protected def ofFunction (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) : OuterMeasure α :=
let μ s := ⨅ (f : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, f i), ∑' i, m (f i)
{ measureOf := μ
empty :=
le_antisymm
((iInf_le_of_le fun _ => ∅) <| iInf_le_of_le (empty_subset _) <| by simp [m_empty])
(zero_le _)
mono := fun {_ _} hs => iInf_mono fun _ => iInf_mono' fun hb => ⟨hs.trans hb, le_rfl⟩
iUnion_nat := fun s _ =>
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add <| by
intro ε hε (hb : (∑' i, μ (s i)) < ∞)
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', hε', hl⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hl) _)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_add]
choose f hf using
show ∀ i, ∃ f : ℕ → Set α, (s i ⊆ ⋃ i, f i) ∧ (∑' i, m (f i)) < μ (s i) + ε' i by
intro i
have : μ (s i) < μ (s i) + ε' i :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb.ne <| ENNReal.le_tsum _)
(by simpa using (hε' i).ne')
rcases iInf_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨t, ht⟩
exists t
contrapose! ht
exact le_iInf ht
refine le_trans ?_ (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => le_of_lt (hf i).2)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_prod, ← Nat.pairEquiv.symm.tsum_eq]
refine iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf_le _ ?_)
apply iUnion_subset
intro i
apply Subset.trans (hf i).1
apply iUnion_subset
simp only [Nat.pairEquiv_symm_apply]
rw [iUnion_unpair]
intro j
apply subset_iUnion₂ i }
variable (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0)
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`. -/
theorem ofFunction_apply (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t), ∑' n, m (t n) :=
rfl
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`, with all `tᵢ` satisfying a predicate `P` such that `m` is infinite for sets
that don't satisfy `P`.
This is similar to `ofFunction_apply`, except that the sets `tᵢ` satisfy `P`.
The hypothesis `m_top` applies in particular to a function of the form `extend m'`. -/
theorem ofFunction_eq_iInf_mem {P : Set α → Prop} (m_top : ∀ s, ¬ P s → m s = ∞) (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s =
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : ∀ i, P (t i)) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i), ∑' i, m (t i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.ofFunction_apply]
apply le_antisymm
· exact le_iInf fun t ↦ le_iInf fun _ ↦ le_iInf fun h ↦ iInf₂_le _ (by exact h)
· simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
refine fun t ht_subset ↦ iInf_le_of_le t ?_
by_cases ht : ∀ i, P (t i)
· exact iInf_le_of_le ht (iInf_le_of_le ht_subset le_rfl)
· simp only [ht, not_false_eq_true, iInf_neg, top_le_iff]
push_neg at ht
obtain ⟨i, hti_not_mem⟩ := ht
have hfi_top : m (t i) = ∞ := m_top _ hti_not_mem
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨i, hfi_top⟩
variable {m m_empty}
theorem ofFunction_le (s : Set α) : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s ≤ m s :=
let f : ℕ → Set α := fun i => Nat.casesOn i s fun _ => ∅
iInf_le_of_le f <|
iInf_le_of_le (subset_iUnion f 0) <|
le_of_eq <| tsum_eq_single 0 <| by
rintro (_ | i)
· simp
· simp [f, m_empty]
theorem ofFunction_eq (s : Set α) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : Set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α, m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, m (s i)) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = m s :=
le_antisymm (ofFunction_le s) <|
le_iInf fun f => le_iInf fun hf => le_trans (m_mono hf) (m_subadd f)
theorem le_ofFunction {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s :=
⟨fun H s => le_trans (H s) (ofFunction_le s), fun H _ =>
le_iInf fun f =>
le_iInf fun hs =>
le_trans (μ.mono hs) <| le_trans (measure_iUnion_le f) <| ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => H _⟩
theorem isGreatest_ofFunction :
IsGreatest { μ : OuterMeasure α | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) :=
⟨fun _ => ofFunction_le _, fun _ => le_ofFunction.2⟩
theorem ofFunction_eq_sSup : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty = sSup { μ | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } :=
(@isGreatest_ofFunction α m m_empty).isLUB.sSup_eq.symm
/-- If `m u = ∞` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `m u = ∞` on any set of diameter `≥ r`, then this lemma
implies that `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s`
and `y ∈ t`. -/
theorem ofFunction_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter {s t : Set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (t ∩ u).Nonempty → m u = ∞) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty (s ∪ t) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s + OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_union_le _ _) (le_iInf₂ fun f hf ↦ ?_)
set μ := OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, (s ∩ f i).Nonempty ∧ (t ∩ f i).Nonempty) with (⟨i, hs, ht⟩ | he)
· calc
μ s + μ t ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ = m (f i) := (h (f i) hs ht).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.le_tsum i
set I := fun s => { i : ℕ | (s ∩ f i).Nonempty }
have hd : Disjoint (I s) (I t) := disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun i hi => he ⟨i, hi⟩
have hI : ∀ u ⊆ s ∪ t, μ u ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := fun u hu =>
calc
μ u ≤ μ (⋃ i : I u, f i) :=
μ.mono fun x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hf (hu hx))
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨i, ⟨x, hx, hi⟩⟩, hi⟩
_ ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := measure_iUnion_le _
calc
μ s + μ t ≤ (∑' i : I s, μ (f i)) + ∑' i : I t, μ (f i) :=
add_le_add (hI _ subset_union_left) (hI _ subset_union_right)
_ = ∑' i : ↑(I s ∪ I t), μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun i => μ (f i)) hd ENNReal.summable).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable)
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => ofFunction_le _
theorem comap_ofFunction {β} (f : β → α) (h : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) :
comap f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f '' s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_ofFunction.2 fun s => ?_) fun s => ?_
· rw [comap_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
· rw [comap_apply, ofFunction_apply, ofFunction_apply]
refine iInf_mono' fun t => ⟨fun k => f ⁻¹' t k, ?_⟩
refine iInf_mono' fun ht => ?_
rw [Set.image_subset_iff, preimage_iUnion] at ht
refine ⟨ht, ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_⟩
rcases h with hl | hr
exacts [hl (image_preimage_subset _ _), (congr_arg m (hr.image_preimage (t n))).le]
theorem map_ofFunction_le {β} (f : α → β) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) ≤
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty :=
le_ofFunction.2 fun s => by
rw [map_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
theorem map_ofFunction {β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty := by
refine (map_ofFunction_le _).antisymm fun s => ?_
simp only [ofFunction_apply, map_apply, le_iInf_iff]
intro t ht
refine iInf_le_of_le (fun n => (range f)ᶜ ∪ f '' t n) (iInf_le_of_le ?_ ?_)
· rw [← union_iUnion, ← inter_subset, ← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_iUnion]
exact image_subset _ ht
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => le_of_eq ?_
simp [hf.preimage_image]
-- TODO (kmill): change `m (t ∩ s)` to `m (s ∩ t)`
theorem restrict_ofFunction (s : Set α) (hm : Monotone m) :
restrict s (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun t => m (t ∩ s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
rw [restrict]
simp only [inter_comm _ s, LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [comap_ofFunction _ (Or.inl hm)]
simp only [map_ofFunction Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
theorem smul_ofFunction {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : c • OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (c • m) (by simp [m_empty]) := by
ext1 s
haveI : Nonempty { t : ℕ → Set α // s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i } := ⟨⟨fun _ => s, subset_iUnion (fun _ => s) 0⟩⟩
simp only [smul_apply, ofFunction_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
iInf_subtype']
rw [ENNReal.mul_iInf fun h => (hc h).elim]
end OfFunction
section BoundedBy
variable {α : Type*} (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets, there is a unique maximal outer measure `μ`
satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. This is the same as `OuterMeasure.ofFunction`,
except that it doesn't require `m ∅ = 0`. -/
def boundedBy : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) (by simp [Set.not_nonempty_empty])
variable {m}
theorem boundedBy_le (s : Set α) : boundedBy m s ≤ m s :=
(ofFunction_le _).trans iSup_const_le
theorem boundedBy_eq_ofFunction (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (s : Set α) :
boundedBy m s = OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s := by
have : (fun s : Set α => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) = m := by
ext1 t
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h <;> simp [h, Set.not_nonempty_empty, m_empty]
simp [boundedBy, this]
theorem boundedBy_apply (s : Set α) :
boundedBy m s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, m (t n) := by
simp [boundedBy, ofFunction_apply]
theorem boundedBy_eq (s : Set α) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : Set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α, m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, m (s i)) : boundedBy m s = m s := by
rw [boundedBy_eq_ofFunction m_empty, ofFunction_eq s m_mono m_subadd]
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_eq_self (m : OuterMeasure α) : boundedBy m = m :=
ext fun _ => boundedBy_eq _ measure_empty (fun _ ht => measure_mono ht) measure_iUnion_le
theorem le_boundedBy {μ : OuterMeasure α} : μ ≤ boundedBy m ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s := by
| rw [boundedBy , le_ofFunction, forall_congr']; intro s
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h <;> simp [h, Set.not_nonempty_empty]
theorem le_boundedBy' {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ boundedBy m ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s.Nonempty → μ s ≤ m s := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/OfFunction.lean | 275 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Louis Carlin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Louis Carlin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic
/-!
# Lemmas about Euclidean domains
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: states Bézout's lemma for Euclidean domains.
-/
universe u
namespace EuclideanDomain
variable {R : Type u}
variable [EuclideanDomain R]
/-- The well founded relation in a Euclidean Domain satisfying `a % b ≺ b` for `b ≠ 0` -/
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => EuclideanDomain.r
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toMulDivCancelClass : MulDivCancelClass R where
mul_div_cancel a b hb := by
refine (eq_of_sub_eq_zero ?_).symm
by_contra h
have := mul_right_not_lt b h
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm (_ / _), sub_eq_iff_eq_add'.2 (div_add_mod (a * b) b).symm] at this
exact this (mod_lt _ hb)
theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {R : Type*} [EuclideanDomain R] (a b : R) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
calc
a % b = b * (a / b) + a % b - b * (a / b) := (add_sub_cancel_left _ _).symm
_ = a - b * (a / b) := by rw [div_add_mod]
theorem val_dvd_le : ∀ a b : R, b ∣ a → a ≠ 0 → ¬a ≺ b
| _, b, ⟨d, rfl⟩, ha => mul_left_not_lt b (mt (by rintro rfl; exact mul_zero _) ha)
@[simp]
theorem mod_eq_zero {a b : R} : a % b = 0 ↔ b ∣ a :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← div_add_mod a b, h, add_zero]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _, fun ⟨c, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, add_zero]
haveI := Classical.dec
by_cases b0 : b = 0
· simp only [b0, zero_mul]
· rw [mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ b0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : R) : a % a = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 dvd_rfl
theorem dvd_mod_iff {a b c : R} (h : c ∣ b) : c ∣ a % b ↔ c ∣ a := by
rw [← dvd_add_right (h.mul_right _), div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : R) : a % 1 = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : R) : 0 % b = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (dvd_zero _)
@[simp]
theorem zero_div {a : R} : 0 / a = 0 :=
by_cases (fun a0 : a = 0 => a0.symm ▸ div_zero 0) fun a0 => by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_div_cancel_right₀ 0 a0
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : R} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel_right₀ 1 a0
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_left {a b c : R} (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c) : a = c / b := by
rw [← h, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hb]
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_right {a b c : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c) : b = c / a := by
rw [← h, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ ha]
theorem mul_div_assoc (x : R) {y z : R} (h : z ∣ y) : x * y / z = x * (y / z) := by
by_cases hz : z = 0
· subst hz
rw [div_zero, div_zero, mul_zero]
rcases h with ⟨p, rfl⟩
rw [mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hz, mul_left_comm, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hz]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {a b : R} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hab : b ∣ a) : b * (a / b) = a := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc _ hab, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hb]
-- This generalizes `Int.div_one`, see note [simp-normal form]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (p : R) : p / 1 = p :=
(EuclideanDomain.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left (one_ne_zero' R) (mul_one p)).symm
theorem div_dvd_of_dvd {p q : R} (hpq : q ∣ p) : p / q ∣ p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, zero_dvd_iff] at hpq
rw [hpq]
exact dvd_zero _
use q
rw [mul_comm, ← EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc _ hpq, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hq]
theorem dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : R} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp only [div_zero, dvd_zero]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
refine ⟨d, ?_⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ ha]
section GCD
variable [DecidableEq R]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (a : R) : gcd a 0 = a := by
rw [gcd]
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h, zero_mod, gcd_zero_left]
theorem gcd_val (a b : R) : gcd a b = gcd (b % a) a := by
rw [gcd]
split_ifs with h <;> [simp only [h, mod_zero, gcd_zero_right]; rfl]
theorem gcd_dvd (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ a ∧ gcd a b ∣ b :=
GCD.induction a b
(fun b => by
rw [gcd_zero_left]
exact ⟨dvd_zero _, dvd_rfl⟩)
fun a b _ ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ => by
rw [gcd_val]
exact ⟨IH₂, (dvd_mod_iff IH₂).1 IH₁⟩
theorem gcd_dvd_left (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ a :=
(gcd_dvd a b).left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ b :=
(gcd_dvd a b).right
protected theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {a b : R} : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [h] using gcd_dvd a b, by
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact gcd_zero_right _⟩
theorem dvd_gcd {a b c : R} : c ∣ a → c ∣ b → c ∣ gcd a b :=
GCD.induction a b (fun _ _ H => by simpa only [gcd_zero_left] using H) fun a b _ IH ca cb => by
rw [gcd_val]
exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff ca).2 cb) ca
theorem gcd_eq_left {a b : R} : gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
apply gcd_dvd_right, fun h => by rw [gcd_val, mod_eq_zero.2 h, gcd_zero_left]⟩
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left (a : R) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
gcd_eq_left.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (a : R) : gcd a a = a :=
gcd_eq_left.2 dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y : R) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
GCD.induction x y
(by
intros
| rw [xgcd_zero_left, gcd_zero_left])
fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [xgcdAux_rec h, if_neg h, IH]
rw [← gcd_val]
| Mathlib/Algebra/EuclideanDomain/Basic.lean | 176 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# Super-Polynomial Function Decay
This file defines a predicate `Asymptotics.SuperpolynomialDecay f` for a function satisfying
one of following equivalent definitions (The definition is in terms of the first condition):
* `x ^ n * f` tends to `𝓝 0` for all (or sufficiently large) naturals `n`
* `|x ^ n * f|` tends to `𝓝 0` for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero`)
* `|x ^ n * f|` is bounded for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_isBoundedUnder`)
* `f` is `o(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isLittleO`)
* `f` is `O(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isBigO`)
These conditions are all equivalent to conditions in terms of polynomials, replacing `x ^ c` with
`p(x)` or `p(x)⁻¹` as appropriate, since asymptotically `p(x)` behaves like `X ^ p.natDegree`.
These further equivalences are not proven in mathlib but would be good future projects.
The definition of superpolynomial decay for `f : α → β` is relative to a parameter `k : α → β`.
Super-polynomial decay then means `f x` decays faster than `(k x) ^ c` for all integers `c`.
Equivalently `f x` decays faster than `p.eval (k x)` for all polynomials `p : β[X]`.
The definition is also relative to a filter `l : Filter α` where the decay rate is compared.
When the map `k` is given by `n ↦ ↑n : ℕ → ℝ` this defines negligible functions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligible_function
When the map `k` is given by `(r₁,...,rₙ) ↦ r₁*...*rₙ : ℝⁿ → ℝ` this is equivalent
to the definition of rapidly decreasing functions given here:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rapidly+decreasing+function
# Main Theorems
* `SuperpolynomialDecay.polynomial_mul` says that if `f(x)` is negligible,
then so is `p(x) * f(x)` for any polynomial `p`.
* `superpolynomialDecay_iff_zpow_tendsto_zero` gives an equivalence between definitions in terms
of decaying faster than `k(x) ^ n` for all naturals `n` or `k(x) ^ c` for all integer `c`.
-/
namespace Asymptotics
open Topology Polynomial
open Filter
/-- `f` has superpolynomial decay in parameter `k` along filter `l` if
`k ^ n * f` tends to zero at `l` for all naturals `n` -/
def SuperpolynomialDecay {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β] (l : Filter α)
(k : α → β) (f : α → β) :=
∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => k a ^ n * f a) l (𝓝 0)
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α} {k : α → β} {f g g' : α → β}
section CommSemiring
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr' (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr' (EventuallyEq.mul (EventuallyEq.refl l _) hfg)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr fun x => (congr_arg fun a => k x ^ z * a) <| hfg x
@[simp]
theorem superpolynomialDecay_zero (l : Filter α) (k : α → β) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k 0 :=
fun z => by simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.add [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f + g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_add, add_zero, Pi.add_apply] using (hf z).add (hg z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_zero, pow_zero] using (hf z).mul (hg 0)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_const [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => f n * c := fun z => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, zero_mul] using Tendsto.mul_const c (hf z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.const_mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => c * f n :=
(hf.mul_const c).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_mul (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k * f) := fun z =>
tendsto_nhds.2 fun s hs hs0 =>
l.sets_of_superset ((tendsto_nhds.1 (hf <| z + 1)) s hs hs0) fun x hx => by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, Pi.mul_apply, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ] using hx
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_param (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k) :=
hf.param_mul.congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_pow_mul (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k ^ n * f) := by
induction n with
| zero => simpa only [one_mul, pow_zero] using hf
| succ n hn => simpa only [pow_succ', mul_assoc] using hn.param_mul
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_param_pow (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k ^ n) :=
(hf.param_pow_mul n).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.polynomial_mul [ContinuousAdd β] [ContinuousMul β]
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (p : β[X]) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun x => (p.eval <| k x) * f x :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simpa [add_mul] using hp.add hq) fun n c => by
simpa [mul_assoc] using (hf.param_pow_mul n).const_mul c
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_polynomial [ContinuousAdd β] [ContinuousMul β]
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (p : β[X]) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun x => f x * (p.eval <| k x) :=
(hf.polynomial_mul p).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
end CommSemiring
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_eventuallyLE (hk : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] k) (hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g)
(hg' : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g') (hfg : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) (hfg' : f ≤ᶠ[l] g') :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f := fun z =>
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' (hg z) (hg' z)
(hfg.mp (hk.mono fun _ hx hx' => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx' (pow_nonneg hx z)))
(hfg'.mp (hk.mono fun _ hx hx' => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx' (pow_nonneg hx z)))
end OrderedCommSemiring
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommRing β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
variable (l k f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => |k a ^ n * f a|) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h z => (tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero _).1 (h z), fun h z =>
(tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero _).2 (h z)⟩
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_superpolynomialDecay_abs :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l (fun a => |k a|) fun a => |f a| :=
(superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero l k f).trans
(by simp_rw [SuperpolynomialDecay, abs_mul, abs_pow])
variable {l k f}
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_eventually_abs_le (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hfg : abs ∘ g ≤ᶠ[l] abs ∘ f) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := by
rw [superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero] at hf ⊢
refine fun z =>
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds (hf z)
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => abs_nonneg _) (hfg.mono fun x hx => ?_)
calc
|k x ^ z * g x| = |k x ^ z| * |g x| := abs_mul (k x ^ z) (g x)
_ ≤ |k x ^ z| * |f x| := by gcongr _ * ?_; exact hx
_ = |k x ^ z * f x| := (abs_mul (k x ^ z) (f x)).symm
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_abs_le (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hfg : ∀ x, |g x| ≤ |f x|) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g :=
hf.trans_eventually_abs_le (Eventually.of_forall hfg)
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section Field
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Field β] (l k f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_mul_const_iff [ContinuousMul β] {c : β} (hc0 : c ≠ 0) :
(SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => f n * c) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f :=
⟨fun h => (h.mul_const c⁻¹).congr fun x => by simp [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc0], fun h =>
h.mul_const c⟩
theorem superpolynomialDecay_const_mul_iff [ContinuousMul β] {c : β} (hc0 : c ≠ 0) :
(SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => c * f n) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f :=
⟨fun h => (h.const_mul c⁻¹).congr fun x => by simp [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hc0], fun h =>
h.const_mul c⟩
variable {l k f}
end Field
section LinearOrderedField
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Field β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
variable (f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_isBoundedUnder (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔
∀ z : ℕ, IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun a : α => |k a ^ z * f a| := by
refine
| ⟨fun h z => Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le (Tendsto.abs (h z)), fun h =>
(superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero l k f).2 fun z => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := h (z + 1)
have h1 : Tendsto (fun _ : α => (0 : β)) l (𝓝 0) := tendsto_const_nhds
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/SuperpolynomialDecay.lean | 199 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
/-! # Right-exactness properties of tensor product
## Modules
* `LinearMap.rTensor_surjective` asserts that when one tensors
a surjective map on the right, one still gets a surjective linear map.
More generally, `LinearMap.rTensor_range` computes the range of
`LinearMap.rTensor`
* `LinearMap.lTensor_surjective` asserts that when one tensors
a surjective map on the left, one still gets a surjective linear map.
More generally, `LinearMap.lTensor_range` computes the range of
`LinearMap.lTensor`
* `TensorProduct.rTensor_exact` says that when one tensors a short exact
sequence on the right, one still gets a short exact sequence
(right-exactness of `TensorProduct.rTensor`),
and `rTensor.equiv` gives the LinearEquiv that follows from this
combined with `LinearMap.rTensor_surjective`.
* `TensorProduct.lTensor_exact` says that when one tensors a short exact
sequence on the left, one still gets a short exact sequence
(right-exactness of `TensorProduct.rTensor`)
and `lTensor.equiv` gives the LinearEquiv that follows from this
combined with `LinearMap.lTensor_surjective`.
* For `N : Submodule R M`, `LinearMap.exact_subtype_mkQ N` says that
the inclusion of the submodule and the quotient map form an exact pair,
and `lTensor_mkQ` compute `ker (lTensor Q (N.mkQ))` and similarly for `rTensor_mkQ`
* `TensorProduct.map_ker` computes the kernel of `TensorProduct.map f g'`
in the presence of two short exact sequences.
The proofs are those of [bourbaki1989] (chap. 2, §3, n°6)
## Algebras
In the case of a tensor product of algebras, these results can be particularized
to compute some kernels.
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.ker_map` computes the kernel of `Algebra.TensorProduct.map f g`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lTensor_ker` and `Algebra.TensorProduct.rTensor_ker`
compute the kernels of `Algebra.TensorProduct.map f id` and `Algebra.TensorProduct.map id g`
## Note on implementation
* All kernels are computed by applying the first isomorphism theorem and
establishing some isomorphisms.
* The proofs are essentially done twice,
once for `lTensor` and then for `rTensor`.
It is possible to apply `TensorProduct.flip` to deduce one of them
from the other.
However, this approach will lead to different isomorphisms,
and it is not quicker.
* The proofs of `Ideal.map_includeLeft_eq` and `Ideal.map_includeRight_eq`
could be easier if `I ⊗[R] B` was naturally an `A ⊗[R] B` module,
and the map to `A ⊗[R] B` was known to be linear.
This depends on the B-module structure on a tensor product
whose use rapidly conflicts with everything…
## TODO
* Treat the noncommutative case
* Treat the case of modules over semirings
(For a possible definition of an exact sequence of commutative semigroups, see
[Grillet-1969b], Pierre-Antoine Grillet,
*The tensor product of commutative semigroups*,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (1969), 281-293, doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0237688-1 .)
-/
section Modules
open TensorProduct LinearMap
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M N P Q : Type*}
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid Q]
[Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
{f : M →ₗ[R] N} (g : N →ₗ[R] P)
lemma le_comap_range_lTensor (q : Q) :
LinearMap.range g ≤ (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q g)).comap (TensorProduct.mk R Q P q) := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨q ⊗ₜ[R] n, rfl⟩
lemma le_comap_range_rTensor (q : Q) :
LinearMap.range g ≤ (LinearMap.range (rTensor Q g)).comap
((TensorProduct.mk R P Q).flip q) := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n ⊗ₜ[R] q, rfl⟩
variable (Q) {g}
/-- If `g` is surjective, then `lTensor Q g` is surjective -/
theorem LinearMap.lTensor_surjective (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
Function.Surjective (lTensor Q g) := by
intro z
induction z with
| zero => exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
| tmul q p =>
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hg p
exact ⟨q ⊗ₜ[R] n, rfl⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hy
exact ⟨x + y, map_add _ _ _⟩
theorem LinearMap.lTensor_range :
range (lTensor Q g) =
range (lTensor Q (Submodule.subtype (range g))) := by
have : g = (Submodule.subtype _).comp g.rangeRestrict := rfl
nth_rewrite 1 [this]
rw [lTensor_comp]
apply range_comp_of_range_eq_top
rw [range_eq_top]
apply lTensor_surjective
rw [← range_eq_top, range_rangeRestrict]
/-- If `g` is surjective, then `rTensor Q g` is surjective -/
theorem LinearMap.rTensor_surjective (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
Function.Surjective (rTensor Q g) := by
intro z
induction z with
| zero => exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
| tmul p q =>
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hg p
exact ⟨n ⊗ₜ[R] q, rfl⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hy
exact ⟨x + y, map_add _ _ _⟩
theorem LinearMap.rTensor_range :
range (rTensor Q g) =
range (rTensor Q (Submodule.subtype (range g))) := by
have : g = (Submodule.subtype _).comp g.rangeRestrict := rfl
nth_rewrite 1 [this]
rw [rTensor_comp]
apply range_comp_of_range_eq_top
rw [range_eq_top]
apply rTensor_surjective
rw [← range_eq_top, range_rangeRestrict]
lemma LinearMap.rTensor_exact_iff_lTensor_exact :
Function.Exact (f.rTensor Q) (g.rTensor Q) ↔
Function.Exact (f.lTensor Q) (g.lTensor Q) :=
Function.Exact.iff_of_ladder_linearEquiv (e₁ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _)
(e₂ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _) (e₃ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _)
(by ext; simp) (by ext; simp)
variable (hg : Function.Surjective g)
| {N' P' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N'] [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R N'] [Module R P']
{g' : N' →ₗ[R] P'} (hg' : Function.Surjective g')
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/RightExactness.lean | 169 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Cones
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
/-!
# Limits and colimits
We set up the general theory of limits and colimits in a category.
In this introduction we only describe the setup for limits;
it is repeated, with slightly different names, for colimits.
The main structures defined in this file is
* `IsLimit c`, for `c : Cone F`, `F : J ⥤ C`, expressing that `c` is a limit cone,
See also `CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits` which further builds:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
/-- A cone `t` on `F` is a limit cone if each cone on `F` admits a unique
cone morphism to `t`. -/
@[stacks 002E]
structure IsLimit (t : Cone F) where
/-- There is a morphism from any cone point to `t.pt` -/
lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s.pt ⟶ t.pt
/-- The map makes the triangle with the two natural transformations commute -/
fac : ∀ (s : Cone F) (j : J), lift s ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j := by aesop_cat
/-- It is the unique such map to do this -/
uniq : ∀ (s : Cone F) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : ∀ j : J, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsLimit.fac
namespace IsLimit
instance subsingleton {t : Cone F} : Subsingleton (IsLimit t) :=
⟨by intro P Q; cases P; cases Q; congr; aesop_cat⟩
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G`, we give a morphism from the cone point
of any cone over `F` to the cone point of a limit cone over `G`. -/
def map {F G : J ⥤ C} (s : Cone F) {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit t) (α : F ⟶ G) : s.pt ⟶ t.pt :=
P.lift ((Cones.postcompose α).obj s)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_π {F G : J ⥤ C} (c : Cone F) {d : Cone G} (hd : IsLimit d) (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
hd.map c α ≫ d.π.app j = c.π.app j ≫ α.app j :=
fac _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_self {c : Cone F} (t : IsLimit c) : t.lift c = 𝟙 c.pt :=
(t.uniq _ _ fun _ => id_comp _).symm
-- Repackaging the definition in terms of cone morphisms.
/-- The universal morphism from any other cone to a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def liftConeMorphism {t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) (s : Cone F) : s ⟶ t where hom := h.lift s
theorem uniq_cone_morphism {s t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) {f f' : s ⟶ t} : f = f' :=
have : ∀ {g : s ⟶ t}, g = h.liftConeMorphism s := by
intro g; apply ConeMorphism.ext; exact h.uniq _ _ g.w
this.trans this.symm
/-- Restating the definition of a limit cone in terms of the ∃! operator. -/
theorem existsUnique {t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) (s : Cone F) :
∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, l ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j :=
⟨h.lift s, h.fac s, h.uniq s⟩
/-- Noncomputably make a limit cone from the existence of unique factorizations. -/
def ofExistsUnique {t : Cone F}
(ht : ∀ s : Cone F, ∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, l ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j) : IsLimit t := by
choose s hs hs' using ht
exact ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩
/-- Alternative constructor for `isLimit`,
providing a morphism of cones rather than a morphism between the cone points
and separately the factorisation condition.
-/
@[simps]
def mkConeMorphism {t : Cone F} (lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s ⟶ t)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Cone F) (m : s ⟶ t), m = lift s) : IsLimit t where
lift s := (lift s).hom
uniq s m w :=
have : ConeMorphism.mk m w = lift s := by apply uniq
congrArg ConeMorphism.hom this
/-- Limit cones on `F` are unique up to isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def uniqueUpToIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) : s ≅ t where
hom := Q.liftConeMorphism s
inv := P.liftConeMorphism t
hom_inv_id := P.uniq_cone_morphism
inv_hom_id := Q.uniq_cone_morphism
/-- Any cone morphism between limit cones is an isomorphism. -/
theorem hom_isIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (f : s ⟶ t) : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨P.liftConeMorphism t, ⟨P.uniq_cone_morphism, Q.uniq_cone_morphism⟩⟩⟩
/-- Limits of `F` are unique up to isomorphism. -/
def conePointUniqueUpToIso {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) : s.pt ≅ t.pt :=
(Cones.forget F).mapIso (uniqueUpToIso P Q)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (j : J) :
(conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).hom ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j :=
(uniqueUpToIso P Q).hom.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) (j : J) :
(conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).inv ≫ s.π.app j = t.π.app j :=
(uniqueUpToIso P Q).inv.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom {r s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) :
P.lift r ≫ (conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).hom = Q.lift r :=
Q.uniq _ _ (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv {r s t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit s) (Q : IsLimit t) :
Q.lift r ≫ (conePointUniqueUpToIso P Q).inv = P.lift r :=
P.uniq _ _ (by simp)
/-- Transport evidence that a cone is a limit cone across an isomorphism of cones. -/
def ofIsoLimit {r t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit r) (i : r ≅ t) : IsLimit t :=
IsLimit.mkConeMorphism (fun s => P.liftConeMorphism s ≫ i.hom) fun s m => by
rw [← i.comp_inv_eq]; apply P.uniq_cone_morphism
@[simp]
theorem ofIsoLimit_lift {r t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit r) (i : r ≅ t) (s) :
(P.ofIsoLimit i).lift s = P.lift s ≫ i.hom.hom :=
rfl
/-- Isomorphism of cones preserves whether or not they are limiting cones. -/
def equivIsoLimit {r t : Cone F} (i : r ≅ t) : IsLimit r ≃ IsLimit t where
toFun h := h.ofIsoLimit i
invFun h := h.ofIsoLimit i.symm
left_inv := by aesop_cat
| right_inv := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/IsLimit.lean | 165 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Ring
/-!
# Internally-graded rings and algebras
This file defines the typeclass `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, for working with an algebra `A` that is
internally graded by a collection of submodules `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A`.
See the docstring of that typeclass for more information.
## Main definitions
* `GradedRing 𝒜`: the typeclass, which is a combination of `SetLike.GradedMonoid`, and
`DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`: A convenience alias for `GradedRing` when `𝒜` is a family of submodules.
* `DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `DirectSum.decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i`, a more bundled version of
`DirectSum.decompose 𝒜`.
* `GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i` is the linear map from `A` to its degree `i : ι` component, such that
`proj 𝒜 i x = decompose 𝒜 x i`.
## Implementation notes
For now, we do not have internally-graded semirings and internally-graded rings; these can be
represented with `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℕ A` and `𝒜 : ι → Submodule ℤ A` respectively, since all
`Semiring`s are ℕ-algebras via `Semiring.toNatAlgebra`, and all `Ring`s are `ℤ`-algebras via
`Ring.toIntAlgebra`.
## Tags
graded algebra, graded ring, graded semiring, decomposition
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι R A σ : Type*}
section GradedRing
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
open DirectSum
/-- An internally-graded `R`-algebra `A` is one that can be decomposed into a collection
of `Submodule R A`s indexed by `ι` such that the canonical map `A → ⨁ i, 𝒜 i` is bijective and
respects multiplication, i.e. the product of an element of degree `i` and an element of degree `j`
is an element of degree `i + j`.
Note that the fact that `A` is internally-graded, `GradedAlgebra 𝒜`, implies an externally-graded
algebra structure `DirectSum.GAlgebra R (fun i ↦ ↥(𝒜 i))`, which in turn makes available an
`Algebra R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i)` instance.
-/
class GradedRing (𝒜 : ι → σ) extends SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜, DirectSum.Decomposition 𝒜
variable [GradedRing 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
a ring to a direct sum of components. -/
def decomposeRingEquiv : A ≃+* ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
RingEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := (coeRingHom 𝒜).map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem decompose_one : decompose 𝒜 (1 : A) = 1 :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜)
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_one : (decompose 𝒜).symm 1 = (1 : A) :=
map_one (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm
@[simp]
theorem decompose_mul (x y : A) : decompose 𝒜 (x * y) = decompose 𝒜 x * decompose 𝒜 y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜) x y
@[simp]
theorem decompose_symm_mul (x y : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (x * y) = (decompose 𝒜).symm x * (decompose 𝒜).symm y :=
map_mul (decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜).symm x y
end DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of a graded ring -/
def GradedRing.proj (i : ι) : A →+ A :=
(AddSubmonoidClass.subtype (𝒜 i)).comp <|
(DFinsupp.evalAddMonoidHom i).comp <|
RingHom.toAddMonoidHom <| RingEquiv.toRingHom <| DirectSum.decomposeRingEquiv 𝒜
@[simp]
theorem GradedRing.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedRing.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (DirectSum.of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedRing.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedRing.mem_support_iff [∀ (i) (x : 𝒜 i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedRing.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedRing
section AddCancelMonoid
open DirectSum
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Semiring A] [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable {i j : ι}
namespace DirectSum
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_add]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 j) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) (i + j) : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 j using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_add]
theorem decompose_mul_add_left [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] (a : 𝒜 i) {b : A} :
decompose 𝒜 (↑a * b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ a (decompose 𝒜 b j) :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_left_mem 𝒜 a.2
theorem decompose_mul_add_right [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a : A} (b : 𝒜 j) :
decompose 𝒜 (a * ↑b) (i + j) =
@GradedMonoid.GMul.mul ι (fun i => 𝒜 i) _ _ _ _ (decompose 𝒜 a i) b :=
Subtype.ext <| coe_decompose_mul_add_of_right_mem 𝒜 b.2
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) j : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b j := by
lift a to 𝒜 0 using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_mem_zero]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜] {a b : A}
(b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 0) : (decompose 𝒜 (a * b) i : A) = decompose 𝒜 a i * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 0 using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_mem_zero]
end DirectSum
end AddCancelMonoid
section GradedAlgebra
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A)
/-- A special case of `GradedRing` with `σ = Submodule R A`. This is useful both because it
can avoid typeclass search, and because it provides a more concise name. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra :=
GradedRing 𝒜
/-- A helper to construct a `GradedAlgebra` when the `SetLike.GradedMonoid` structure is already
available. This makes the `left_inv` condition easier to prove, and phrases the `right_inv`
condition in a way that allows custom `@[ext]` lemmas to apply.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev GradedAlgebra.ofAlgHom [SetLike.GradedMonoid 𝒜] (decompose : A →ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i)
(right_inv : (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜).comp decompose = AlgHom.id R A)
(left_inv : ∀ i (x : 𝒜 i), decompose (x : A) = DirectSum.of (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) i x) :
GradedAlgebra 𝒜 where
decompose' := decompose
left_inv := AlgHom.congr_fun right_inv
right_inv := by
suffices decompose.comp (DirectSum.coeAlgHom 𝒜) = AlgHom.id _ _ from AlgHom.congr_fun this
ext i x : 2
exact (decompose.congr_arg <| DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of _ _ _).trans (left_inv i x)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
namespace DirectSum
/-- If `A` is graded by `ι` with degree `i` component `𝒜 i`, then it is isomorphic as
an algebra to a direct sum of components. -/
-- Porting note: deleted [simps] and added the corresponding lemmas by hand
def decomposeAlgEquiv : A ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, 𝒜 i :=
AlgEquiv.symm
{ (decomposeAddEquiv 𝒜).symm with
map_mul' := map_mul (coeAlgHom 𝒜)
commutes' := (coeAlgHom 𝒜).commutes }
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_apply (a : A) :
decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜 a = decompose 𝒜 a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decomposeAlgEquiv_symm_apply (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) :
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm a = (decompose 𝒜).symm a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma decompose_algebraMap (r : R) :
decompose 𝒜 (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).commutes r
@[simp]
lemma decompose_symm_algebraMap (r : R) :
(decompose 𝒜).symm (algebraMap R (⨁ i, 𝒜 i) r) = algebraMap R A r :=
(decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).symm.commutes r
end DirectSum
open DirectSum
/-- The projection maps of graded algebra -/
def GradedAlgebra.proj (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜] (i : ι) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(𝒜 i).subtype.comp <| (DFinsupp.lapply i).comp <| (decomposeAlgEquiv 𝒜).toAlgHom.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_apply (i : ι) (r : A) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r = (decompose 𝒜 r : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) i :=
rfl
theorem GradedAlgebra.proj_recompose (a : ⨁ i, 𝒜 i) (i : ι) :
GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i ((decompose 𝒜).symm a) = (decompose 𝒜).symm (of _ i (a i)) := by
rw [GradedAlgebra.proj_apply, decompose_symm_of, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem GradedAlgebra.mem_support_iff [DecidableEq A] (r : A) (i : ι) :
i ∈ (decompose 𝒜 r).support ↔ GradedAlgebra.proj 𝒜 i r ≠ 0 :=
DFinsupp.mem_support_iff.trans Submodule.coe_eq_zero.not.symm
end GradedAlgebra
section CanonicalOrder
open SetLike.GradedMonoid DirectSum
variable [Semiring A] [DecidableEq ι]
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [PartialOrder ι] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd ι]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ) [GradedRing 𝒜]
/-- If `A` is graded by a canonically ordered add monoid, then the projection map `x ↦ x₀` is a ring
homomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def GradedRing.projZeroRingHom : A →+* A where
toFun a := decompose 𝒜 a 0
map_one' :=
-- Porting note: qualified `one_mem`
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 SetLike.GradedOne.one_mem
map_zero' := by
simp only -- Porting note: added
rw [decompose_zero]
rfl
map_add' _ _ := by
simp only -- Porting note: added
rw [decompose_add]
rfl
map_mul' := by
refine DirectSum.Decomposition.inductionOn 𝒜 (fun x => ?_) ?_ ?_
· simp only [zero_mul, decompose_zero, zero_apply, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
· rintro i ⟨c, hc⟩
refine DirectSum.Decomposition.inductionOn 𝒜 ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [mul_zero, decompose_zero, zero_apply, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
· rintro j ⟨c', hc'⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk]
by_cases h : i + j = 0
· rw [decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜
(show c * c' ∈ 𝒜 0 from h ▸ SetLike.GradedMul.mul_mem hc hc'),
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 (show c ∈ 𝒜 0 from (add_eq_zero.mp h).1 ▸ hc),
decompose_of_mem_same 𝒜 (show c' ∈ 𝒜 0 from (add_eq_zero.mp h).2 ▸ hc')]
· rw [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 (SetLike.GradedMul.mul_mem hc hc') h]
rcases show i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 by rwa [add_eq_zero, not_and_or] at h with h' | h'
· simp only [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 hc h', zero_mul]
· simp only [decompose_of_mem_ne 𝒜 hc' h', mul_zero]
· intro _ _ hd he
simp only at hd he -- Porting note: added
simp only [mul_add, decompose_add, add_apply, AddMemClass.coe_add, hd, he]
· rintro _ _ ha hb _
simp only at ha hb -- Porting note: added
simp only [add_mul, decompose_add, add_apply, AddMemClass.coe_add, ha, hb]
section GradeZero
/-- The ring homomorphism from `A` to `𝒜 0` sending every `a : A` to `a₀`. -/
def GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' : A →+* 𝒜 0 :=
((GradedRing.projZeroRingHom 𝒜).codRestrict _ fun _x => SetLike.coe_mem _ :
A →+* SetLike.GradeZero.subsemiring 𝒜)
@[simp] lemma GradedRing.coe_projZeroRingHom'_apply (a : A) :
(GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜 a : A) = GradedRing.projZeroRingHom 𝒜 a := rfl
@[simp] lemma GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_apply_coe (a : 𝒜 0) :
GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜 a = a := by
ext; simp only [coe_projZeroRingHom'_apply, projZeroRingHom_apply, decompose_coe, of_eq_same]
/-- The ring homomorphism `GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜` is surjective. -/
lemma GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_surjective :
Function.Surjective (GradedRing.projZeroRingHom' 𝒜) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective (GradedRing.projZeroRingHom'_apply_coe 𝒜)
end GradeZero
variable {a b : A} {n i : ι}
namespace DirectSum
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_of_not_le (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = 0 := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_of_not_le (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = 0 := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le]
variable [Sub ι] [OrderedSub ι] [AddLeftReflectLE ι]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem_of_le (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = a * decompose 𝒜 b (n - i) := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply_of_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem_of_le (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) (h : i ≤ n) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = decompose 𝒜 a (n - i) * b := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rwa [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply_of_le]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_left_mem (n) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] (a_mem : a ∈ 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = if i ≤ n then a * decompose 𝒜 b (n - i) else 0 := by
lift a to 𝒜 i using a_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_of_mul_apply]
theorem coe_decompose_mul_of_right_mem (n) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] (b_mem : b ∈ 𝒜 i) :
(decompose 𝒜 (a * b) n : A) = if i ≤ n then decompose 𝒜 a (n - i) * b else 0 := by
lift b to 𝒜 i using b_mem
rw [decompose_mul, decompose_coe, coe_mul_of_apply]
end DirectSum
end CanonicalOrder
namespace DirectSum.IsInternal
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
| variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι]
variable {M : ι → Submodule R A} [SetLike.GradedMonoid M]
-- The following lines were given on Zulip by Adam Topaz
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/Basic.lean | 352 | 355 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Properties
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines orthogonal bilinear forms.
## Notations
Given any term `B` of type `BilinForm`, due to a coercion, can use
the notation `B x y` to refer to the function field, ie. `B x y = B.bilin x y`.
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M`, `M'`, ... are modules over the commutative semiring `R`,
- `M₁`, `M₁'`, ... are modules over the commutative ring `R₁`,
- `V`, ... is a vector space over the field `K`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilinear_form>
## Tags
Bilinear form,
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {V : Type*} {K : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
variable {B : BilinForm R M} {B₁ : BilinForm R₁ M₁}
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
/-- The proposition that two elements of a bilinear form space are orthogonal. For orthogonality
of an indexed set of elements, use `BilinForm.iIsOrtho`. -/
def IsOrtho (B : BilinForm R M) (x y : M) : Prop :=
B x y = 0
theorem isOrtho_def {B : BilinForm R M} {x y : M} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B x y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOrtho_zero_left (x : M) : IsOrtho B (0 : M) x := LinearMap.isOrtho_zero_left B x
theorem isOrtho_zero_right (x : M) : IsOrtho B x (0 : M) :=
zero_right x
theorem ne_zero_of_not_isOrtho_self {B : BilinForm K V} (x : V) (hx₁ : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) : x ≠ 0 :=
fun hx₂ => hx₁ (hx₂.symm ▸ isOrtho_zero_left _)
theorem IsRefl.ortho_comm (H : B.IsRefl) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
theorem IsAlt.ortho_comm (H : B₁.IsAlt) {x y : M₁} : IsOrtho B₁ x y ↔ IsOrtho B₁ y x :=
LinearMap.IsAlt.ortho_comm H
theorem IsSymm.ortho_comm (H : B.IsSymm) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
LinearMap.IsSymm.ortho_comm H
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear form `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`BilinForm.IsOrtho` -/
def iIsOrtho {n : Type w} (B : BilinForm R M) (v : n → M) : Prop :=
B.IsOrthoᵢ v
theorem iIsOrtho_def {n : Type w} {B : BilinForm R M} {v : n → M} :
B.iIsOrtho v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
section
variable {R₄ M₄ : Type*} [CommRing R₄] [IsDomain R₄]
variable [AddCommGroup M₄] [Module R₄ M₄] {G : BilinForm R₄ M₄}
@[simp]
theorem isOrtho_smul_left {x y : M₄} {a : R₄} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho G (a • x) y ↔ IsOrtho G x y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_smul]
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun a ↦ (ha a).elim
@[simp]
theorem isOrtho_smul_right {x y : M₄} {a : R₄} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho G x (a • y) ↔ IsOrtho G x y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_smul]
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun a ↦ (ha a).elim
/-- A set of orthogonal vectors `v` with respect to some bilinear form `B` is linearly independent
if for all `i`, `B (v i) (v i) ≠ 0`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_iIsOrtho {n : Type w} {B : BilinForm K V} {v : n → V}
(hv₁ : B.iIsOrtho v) (hv₂ : ∀ i, ¬B.IsOrtho (v i) (v i)) : LinearIndependent K v := by
classical
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
| intro s w hs i hi
have : B (s.sum fun i : n => w i • v i) (v i) = 0 := by rw [hs, zero_left]
have hsum : (s.sum fun j : n => w j * B (v j) (v i)) = w i * B (v i) (v i) := by
apply Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i hi
intro j _ hij
rw [iIsOrtho_def.1 hv₁ _ _ hij, mul_zero]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Orthogonal.lean | 109 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Bounded order homomorphisms
This file defines (bounded) order homomorphisms.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `TopHom`: Maps which preserve `⊤`.
* `BotHom`: Maps which preserve `⊥`.
* `BoundedOrderHom`: Bounded order homomorphisms. Monotone maps which preserve `⊤` and `⊥`.
## Typeclasses
* `TopHomClass`
* `BotHomClass`
* `BoundedOrderHomClass`
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊤`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure TopHom (α β : Type*) [Top α] [Top β] where
/-- The underlying function. The preferred spelling is `DFunLike.coe`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The function preserves the top element. The preferred spelling is `map_top`. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The type of `⊥`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure BotHom (α β : Type*) [Bot α] [Bot β] where
/-- The underlying function. The preferred spelling is `DFunLike.coe`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The function preserves the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `map_bot`. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
/-- The type of bounded order homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure BoundedOrderHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [BoundedOrder α]
[BoundedOrder β] extends OrderHom α β where
/-- The function preserves the top element. The preferred spelling is `map_top`. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The function preserves the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `map_bot`. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
section
/-- `TopHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊤`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `TopHom`. -/
class TopHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Top α] [Top β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- A `TopHomClass` morphism preserves the top element. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- `BotHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊥`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BotHom`. -/
class BotHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Bot α] [Bot β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- A `BotHomClass` morphism preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
/-- `BoundedOrderHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of bounded order morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BoundedOrderHom`. -/
class BoundedOrderHomClass (F α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends RelHomClass F ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop) ((· ≤ ·) : β → β → Prop) where
/-- Morphisms preserve the top element. The preferred spelling is `_root_.map_top`. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- Morphisms preserve the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `_root_.map_bot`. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
end
export TopHomClass (map_top)
export BotHomClass (map_bot)
attribute [simp] map_top map_bot
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedOrderHomClass.toTopHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] : TopHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedOrderHomClass F α β› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedOrderHomClass.toBotHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] : BotHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedOrderHomClass F α β› with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toTopHomClass [LE α] [OrderTop α]
[PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : TopHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_top := fun f => top_le_iff.1 <| (map_inv_le_iff f).1 le_top }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBotHomClass [LE α] [OrderBot α]
[PartialOrder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : BotHomClass F α β :=
{ map_bot := fun f => le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_map_inv_iff f).1 bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBoundedOrderHomClass [LE α] [BoundedOrder α]
[PartialOrder β] [BoundedOrder β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : BoundedOrderHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance, OrderIsoClass.toTopHomClass,
OrderIsoClass.toBotHomClass with }
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_top_iff [LE α] [OrderTop α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
(f : F) {a : α} : f a = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ := by
rw [← map_top f, (EquivLike.injective f).eq_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff [LE α] [OrderBot α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
(f : F) {a : α} : f a = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [← map_bot f, (EquivLike.injective f).eq_iff]
end Equiv
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `TopHomClass F α β` into an actual
`TopHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `TopHom α β`. -/
| @[coe]
def TopHomClass.toTopHom [Top α] [Top β] [TopHomClass F α β] (f : F) : TopHom α β :=
⟨f, map_top f⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Bounded.lean | 146 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
end Rec
open scoped Relator in
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, r (f (castSucc i)) (f i.succ) := by
constructor
· intro H i
exact H i.castSucc_lt_succ
· refine fun H i => Fin.induction (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp [le_def] at h
· intro j ihj hij
rw [← le_castSucc_iff] at hij
obtain hij | hij := (le_def.1 hij).eq_or_lt
· obtain rfl := Fin.ext hij
exact H _
· exact _root_.trans (ihj hij) (H j)
section AddGroup
open Nat Int
/-- Negation on `Fin n` -/
instance neg (n : ℕ) : Neg (Fin n) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩⟩
theorem neg_def (a : Fin n) : -a = ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩ := rfl
protected theorem coe_neg (a : Fin n) : ((-a : Fin n) : ℕ) = (n - a) % n :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero (n : Fin 1) : n = 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma eq_one_of_ne_zero (i : Fin 2) (hi : i ≠ 0) : i = 1 := by fin_omega
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias eq_one_of_neq_zero := eq_one_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : Fin (n + 1)) = n := by
cases n
· simp
rw [Fin.coe_neg, Fin.val_one, Nat.add_one_sub_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
constructor
theorem last_sub (i : Fin (n + 1)) : last n - i = Fin.rev i :=
Fin.ext <| by rw [coe_sub_iff_le.2 i.le_last, val_last, val_rev, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a < b) : a + 1 ≤ b := by
cases n <;> fin_omega
theorem exists_eq_add_of_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (h : a ≤ b) : ∃ k ≤ b, b = a + k := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (b : ℕ) = a + k := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
have hkb : k ≤ b := by omega
refine ⟨⟨k, hkb.trans_lt b.is_lt⟩, hkb, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, ← hk, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.is_lt]
theorem exists_eq_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a < b) :
∃ k < b, k + 1 ≤ b ∧ b = a + k + 1 := by
cases n
· omega
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (b : ℕ) = a + k + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt h
have hkb : k < b := by omega
refine ⟨⟨k, hkb.trans b.is_lt⟩, hkb, by fin_omega, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, ← hk, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.is_lt]
lemma pos_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a ≠ 0) :
0 < a :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (val_ne_of_ne h)
lemma sub_succ_le_sub_of_le {n : ℕ} {u v : Fin (n + 2)} (h : u < v) : v - (u + 1) < v - u := by
fin_omega
end AddGroup
@[simp]
theorem coe_natCast_eq_mod (m n : ℕ) [NeZero m] :
((n : Fin m) : ℕ) = n % m :=
rfl
theorem coe_ofNat_eq_mod (m n : ℕ) [NeZero m] :
((ofNat(n) : Fin m) : ℕ) = ofNat(n) % m :=
rfl
section Mul
/-!
### mul
-/
protected theorem mul_one' [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : k * 1 = k := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
cases n
· simp [fin_one_eq_zero]
simp [Fin.ext_iff, mul_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
protected theorem one_mul' [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : (1 : Fin n) * k = k := by
rw [Fin.mul_comm, Fin.mul_one']
protected theorem mul_zero' [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : k * 0 = 0 := by simp [Fin.ext_iff, mul_def]
protected theorem zero_mul' [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : (0 : Fin n) * k = 0 := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, mul_def]
end Mul
end Fin
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,749 | 1,751 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
/-!
# Nilpotent elements
This file develops the basic theory of nilpotent elements. In particular it shows that the
nilpotent elements are closed under many operations.
For the definition of `nilradical`, see `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas`.
## Main definitions
* `isNilpotent_neg_iff`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_add`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_sub`
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
variable {R S : Type*} {x y : R}
theorem IsNilpotent.neg [Ring R] (h : IsNilpotent x) : IsNilpotent (-x) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
use n
rw [neg_pow, hn, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem isNilpotent_neg_iff [Ring R] : IsNilpotent (-x) ↔ IsNilpotent x :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg x ▸ h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
lemma IsNilpotent.smul [MonoidWithZero R] [MonoidWithZero S] [MulActionWithZero R S]
[SMulCommClass R S S] [IsScalarTower R S S] {a : S} (ha : IsNilpotent a) (t : R) :
IsNilpotent (t • a) := by
obtain ⟨k, ha⟩ := ha
use k
rw [smul_pow, ha, smul_zero]
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_sub_one [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (r - 1) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨⟨r - 1, -∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, r ^ i, ?_, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
· simp [mul_geom_sum, hn]
· simp [geom_sum_mul, hn]
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_one_sub [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (1 - r) := by
rw [← IsUnit.neg_iff, neg_sub]
exact isUnit_sub_one hnil
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_one [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (r + 1) := by
rw [← IsUnit.neg_iff, neg_add']
exact isUnit_sub_one hnil.neg
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_one_add [Ring R] {r : R} (hnil : IsNilpotent r) : IsUnit (1 + r) :=
add_comm r 1 ▸ isUnit_add_one hnil
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_left_of_commute [Ring R] {r u : R}
(hnil : IsNilpotent r) (hu : IsUnit u) (h_comm : Commute r u) :
IsUnit (u + r) := by
rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units _ hu.unit⁻¹, add_mul, IsUnit.mul_val_inv]
replace h_comm : Commute r (↑hu.unit⁻¹) := Commute.units_inv_right h_comm
refine IsNilpotent.isUnit_one_add ?_
exact (hu.unit⁻¹.isUnit.isNilpotent_mul_unit_of_commute_iff h_comm).mpr hnil
theorem IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_right_of_commute [Ring R] {r u : R}
(hnil : IsNilpotent r) (hu : IsUnit u) (h_comm : Commute r u) :
IsUnit (r + u) :=
add_comm r u ▸ hnil.isUnit_add_left_of_commute hu h_comm
lemma IsUnit.not_isNilpotent [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] {x : R} (hx : IsUnit x) :
¬ IsNilpotent x := by
intro H
simpa using H.isUnit_add_right_of_commute hx.neg (by simp)
lemma IsNilpotent.not_isUnit [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] {x : R} (hx : IsNilpotent x) :
¬ IsUnit x :=
mt IsUnit.not_isNilpotent (by simpa only [not_not] using hx)
lemma IsIdempotentElem.eq_zero_of_isNilpotent [MonoidWithZero R] {e : R}
(idem : IsIdempotentElem e) (nilp : IsNilpotent e) : e = 0 := by
obtain ⟨rfl | n, hn⟩ := nilp
· rw [pow_zero] at hn; rw [← one_mul e, hn, zero_mul]
· rw [← hn, idem.pow_succ_eq]
| alias IsNilpotent.eq_zero_of_isIdempotentElem := IsIdempotentElem.eq_zero_of_isNilpotent
instance [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] [Zero S] [Pow S ℕ] [IsReduced R] [IsReduced S] : IsReduced (R × S) where
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nilpotent/Basic.lean | 100 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
add_comm g f ▸ hg.add_convexOn hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.add (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_convexOn hg.dual
theorem ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_strictConvexOn hg.dual
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_convexOn (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_concaveOn (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • r + b • r :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hx.2 ha)
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hy.2.le hb.le))
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab _⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
theorem ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ f q.1 ≤ q.2) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } := by
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine ⟨hf.1 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • p.1 + b • q.1) ≤ a • f p.1 + b • f q.1 := hf.2 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • p.2 + b • q.2 := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hp.2 ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hq.2 hb.le)
theorem ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ q.2 ≤ f q.1) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp hq
theorem ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.mpr fun p hp q hq =>
hf.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp ⟨hq.1, hq.2.le⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_strict_epigraph
end Module
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f g : E → β}
/-- The pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex. -/
theorem ConvexOn.sup (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
refine ⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => sup_le ?_ ?_⟩
· calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left
· calc
g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • g x + b • g y := hg.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right
/-- The pointwise minimum of concave functions is concave. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.inf (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- The pointwise maximum of strictly convex functions is strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.sup (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
max_lt
(calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left)
(calc
g (a • x + b • y) < a • g x + b • g y := hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right)⟩
/-- The pointwise minimum of strictly concave functions is strictly concave. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.inf (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment hx hy hz
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) < max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
min (f x) (f y) < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : f z < max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : min (f x) (f y) < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_on_openSegment hx hy hxy hz
end LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section OrderedSMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left h ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y) :
f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x) :
f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb.le hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z ≤ f y) : f x ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha.le hb hab hxz
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z ≤ f x) : f y ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le hx hy hz hxz
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/- The following lemmas don't require `Module 𝕜 E` if you add the hypothesis `x ≠ y`. At the time of
the writing, we decided the resulting lemmas wouldn't be useful. Feel free to reintroduce them. -/
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f x :=
not_le.1 fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le) (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) < f y) :
f x < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) < f x) :
f y < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y < f z) : f z < f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
| (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z < f y) : f x < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 756 | 759 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Colimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Instances
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.LocalPredicate
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `PrimeSpectrum R`.
We define the structure sheaf on `TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)`, for a commutative ring `R` and prove
basic properties about it. We define this as a subsheaf of the sheaf of dependent functions into the
localizations, cut out by the condition that the function must be locally equal to a ratio of
elements of `R`.
Because the condition "is equal to a fraction" passes to smaller open subsets,
the subset of functions satisfying this condition is automatically a subpresheaf.
Because the condition "is locally equal to a fraction" is local,
it is also a subsheaf.
(It may be helpful to refer back to `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafOfFunctions.lean`,
where we show that dependent functions into any type family form a sheaf,
and also `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/LocalPredicate.lean`, where we characterise the predicates
which pick out sub-presheaves and sub-sheaves of these sheaves.)
We also set up the ring structure, obtaining
`structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)`.
We then construct two basic isomorphisms, relating the structure sheaf to the underlying ring `R`.
First, `StructureSheaf.stalkIso` gives an isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf
at a point `p` and the localization of `R` at the prime ideal `p`. Second,
`StructureSheaf.basicOpenIso` gives an isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basicOpen f`
and the localization of `R` at the submonoid of powers of `f`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R]
open TopCat
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open Opposite
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The prime spectrum, just as a topological space.
-/
def PrimeSpectrum.Top : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
namespace StructureSheaf
/-- The type family over `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of the localization over each point.
-/
def Localizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Type u :=
Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance commRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance localRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : IsLocalRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsLocalRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Inhabited (Localizations R P) :=
⟨1⟩
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) : Algebra R (Localizations R x) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal)
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (Localizations R x) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal :=
Localization.isLocalization
variable {R}
/-- The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def IsFraction {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) : Prop :=
∃ r s : R, ∀ x : U, ¬s ∈ x.1.asIdeal ∧ f x * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r
theorem IsFraction.eq_mk' {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} {f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x}
(hf : IsFraction f) :
∃ r s : R,
∀ x : U,
∃ hs : s ∉ x.1.asIdeal,
f x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime _) r
(⟨s, hs⟩ : (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, s, h⟩
refine ⟨r, s, fun x => ⟨(h x).1, (IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr ?_).symm⟩⟩
exact (h x).2.symm
variable (R)
/-- The predicate `IsFraction` is "prelocal",
in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def isFractionPrelocal : PrelocalPredicate (Localizations R) where
pred {_} f := IsFraction f
res := by rintro V U i f ⟨r, s, w⟩; exact ⟨r, s, fun x => w (i x)⟩
/-- We will define the structure sheaf as
the subsheaf of all dependent functions in `Π x : U, Localizations R x`
consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed as a ratio of
(the images in the localization of) elements of `R`.
Quoting Hartshorne:
For an open set $U ⊆ Spec A$, we define $𝒪(U)$ to be the set of functions
$s : U → ⨆_{𝔭 ∈ U} A_𝔭$, such that $s(𝔭) ∈ A_𝔭$ for each $𝔭$,
and such that $s$ is locally a quotient of elements of $A$:
to be precise, we require that for each $𝔭 ∈ U$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $𝔭$,
contained in $U$, and elements $a, f ∈ A$, such that for each $𝔮 ∈ V, f ∉ 𝔮$,
and $s(𝔮) = a/f$ in $A_𝔮$.
Now Hartshorne had the disadvantage of not knowing about dependent functions,
so we replace his circumlocution about functions into a disjoint union with
`Π x : U, Localizations x`.
-/
def isLocallyFraction : LocalPredicate (Localizations R) :=
(isFractionPrelocal R).sheafify
@[simp]
theorem isLocallyFraction_pred {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) :
(isLocallyFraction R).pred f =
∀ x : U,
∃ (V : _) (_ : x.1 ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U),
∃ r s : R,
∀ y : V, ¬s ∈ y.1.asIdeal ∧ f (i y : U) * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r :=
rfl
/-- The functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction` form a subring.
-/
def sectionsSubring (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
Subring (∀ x : U.unop, Localizations R x) where
carrier := { f | (isLocallyFraction R).pred f }
zero_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 0, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
one_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 1, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
add_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * sb + rb * sa, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.add_apply, RingHom.map_mul, add_mul, RingHom.map_add] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_assoc]
congr 2
rw [mul_comm]
neg_mem' := by
intro a ha x
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, r, s, w⟩
refine ⟨V, m, i, -r, s, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases w y with ⟨nm, w⟩
fconstructor
· exact nm
· simp only [RingHom.map_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
rw [← w]
simp only [neg_mul]
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * rb, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.mul_apply, RingHom.map_mul] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
end StructureSheaf
open StructureSheaf
/-- The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRingCat`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction`.
-/
def structureSheafInType : Sheaf (Type u) (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
subsheafToTypes (isLocallyFraction R)
instance commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
CommRing ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U) :=
(sectionsSubring R U).toCommRing
open PrimeSpectrum
/-- The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRingCat`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf.
-/
@[simps obj_carrier]
def structurePresheafInCommRing : Presheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) where
obj U := CommRingCat.of ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U)
map {_ _} i := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun := (structureSheafInType R).1.map i
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- Some glue, verifying that the structure presheaf valued in `CommRingCat` agrees
with the `Type` valued structure presheaf.
-/
def structurePresheafCompForget :
structurePresheafInCommRing R ⋙ forget CommRingCat ≅ (structureSheafInType R).1 :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
open TopCat.Presheaf
/-- The structure sheaf on $Spec R$, valued in `CommRingCat`.
This is provided as a bundled `SheafedSpace` as `Spec.SheafedSpace R` later.
-/
def Spec.structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
⟨structurePresheafInCommRing R,
(-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRingCat`.
isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
_ _).mpr
(isSheaf_of_iso (structurePresheafCompForget R).symm (structureSheafInType R).cond)⟩
open Spec (structureSheaf)
namespace StructureSheaf
@[simp]
theorem res_apply (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U)
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : V) :
((structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s).1 x = (s.1 (i x) :) :=
rfl
/-
Notation in this comment
X = Spec R
OX = structure sheaf
In the following we construct an isomorphism between OX_p and R_p given any point p corresponding
to a prime ideal in R.
We do this via 8 steps:
1. def const (f g : R) (V) (hv : V ≤ D_g) : OX(V) [for api]
2. def toOpen (U) : R ⟶ OX(U)
3. [2] def toStalk (p : Spec R) : R ⟶ OX_p
4. [2] def toBasicOpen (f : R) : R_f ⟶ OX(D_f)
5. [3] def localizationToStalk (p : Spec R) : R_p ⟶ OX_p
6. def openToLocalization (U) (p) (hp : p ∈ U) : OX(U) ⟶ R_p
7. [6] def stalkToFiberRingHom (p : Spec R) : OX_p ⟶ R_p
8. [5,7] def stalkIso (p : Spec R) : OX_p ≅ R_p
In the square brackets we list the dependencies of a construction on the previous steps.
-/
/-- The section of `structureSheaf R` on an open `U` sending each `x ∈ U` to the element
`f/g` in the localization of `R` at `x`. -/
def const (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
⟨fun x => IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, g, fun y => ⟨hu y y.2, IsLocalization.mk'_spec _ _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal) f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem const_apply' (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U)
(hx : g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hx⟩ :=
rfl
theorem exists_const (U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
∃ (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (_ : x ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U) (f g : R) (hg : _),
const R f g V hg = (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
let ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hfg⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hx⟩
⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, fun y hyV => (hfg ⟨y, hyV⟩).1,
Subtype.eq <| funext fun y => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| Eq.symm <| (hfg y).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem res_const (f g : R) (U hu V hv i) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map i (const R f g U hu) = const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem res_const' (f g : R) (V hv) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map (homOfLE hv).op (const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ => id) =
const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem const_zero (f : R) (U hu) : const R 0 f U hu = 0 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| by
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
exact (mul_eq_zero_of_left rfl ((algebraMap R (Localizations R x)) _)).symm
theorem const_self (f : R) (U hu) : const R f f U hu = 1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => IsLocalization.mk'_self _ _
theorem const_one (U) : (const R 1 1 U fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _) = 1 :=
const_self R 1 U _
theorem const_add (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ + const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * g₂ + f₂ * g₁) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx =>
Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_add _ _
⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_mul (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ * const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx => Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_mul _ f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_ext {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu₁ hu₂} (h : f₁ * g₂ = f₂ * g₁) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ = const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_of_eq (by rw [mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk, ← h, mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk])
theorem const_congr {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu} (hf : f₁ = f₂) (hg : g₁ = g₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu = const R f₂ g₂ U (hg ▸ hu) := by substs hf hg; rfl
theorem const_mul_rev (f g : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) : const R f g U hu₁ * const R g f U hu₂ = 1 := by
rw [const_mul, const_congr R rfl (mul_comm g f), const_self]
theorem const_mul_cancel (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g₁ U hu₁ * const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [const_mul, const_ext]; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem const_mul_cancel' (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ * const R f g₁ U hu₁ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [mul_comm, const_mul_cancel]
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as
a section of the structure sheaf. -/
def toOpen (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) :
CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun f :=
⟨fun _ => algebraMap R _ f, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, 1, fun y =>
⟨(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 y.1.2.1, by simp [RingHom.map_one, mul_one]⟩⟩⟩
map_one' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_one _
map_mul' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_mul _ _ _
map_zero' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_zero _
map_add' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_add _ _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_res (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op = toOpen R V :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_apply (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) (x : U) :
(toOpen R U f).1 x = algebraMap _ _ f :=
rfl
theorem toOpen_eq_const (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) :
toOpen R U f = const R f 1 U fun x _ => (Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 x.2.1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_one _ f
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as an element of
the stalk of `structureSheaf R` at `x`. -/
def toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
(toOpen R ⊤ ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ _ x (by trivial))
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_germ (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx = toStalk R x := by
rw [← toOpen_res R ⊤ U (homOfLE le_top : U ⟶ ⊤), Category.assoc, Presheaf.germ_res]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem germ_toOpen
(U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx (toOpen R U f) = toStalk R x f := by
rw [← toOpen_germ]; rfl
theorem toOpen_Γgerm_apply (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.Γgerm x (toOpen R ⊤ f) = toStalk R x f :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_to_basicOpen_self (f : R) : IsUnit (toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) f) :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (const R 1 f (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) fun _ => id) <| by
rw [toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_rev]
theorem isUnit_toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
IsUnit (toStalk R x (f : R)) := by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (f : R)) x f.2 (f : R)]
exact RingHom.isUnit_map _ (isUnit_to_basicOpen_self R f)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from the localization of `R` at `p` to the stalk
of the structure sheaf at the point `p`. -/
def localizationToStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
CommRingCat.ofHom <|
show Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal →+* _ from IsLocalization.lift (isUnit_toStalk R x)
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_of (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
localizationToStalk R x (algebraMap _ (Localization _) f) = toStalk R x f :=
IsLocalization.lift_eq (S := Localization x.asIdeal.primeCompl) _ f
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_mk' (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) (s : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
localizationToStalk R x (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) f s) =
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (s : R)) x s.2
(const R f s (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ => id) :=
(IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec (S := Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2,
← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2, ← RingHom.map_mul, toOpen_eq_const,
toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
|
/-- The ring homomorphism that takes a section of the structure sheaf of `R` on the open set `U`,
implemented as a subtype of dependent functions to localizations at prime ideals, and evaluates
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/StructureSheaf.lean | 449 | 451 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau, Kim Morrison, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
/-!
# Lists of elements of `Fin n`
This file develops some results on `finRange n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
theorem finRange_eq_pmap_range (n : ℕ) : finRange n = (range n).pmap Fin.mk (by simp) := by
apply List.ext_getElem <;> simp [finRange]
@[simp]
theorem mem_finRange {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) : a ∈ finRange n := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact mem_pmap.2
⟨a.1, mem_range.2 a.2, by
cases a
rfl⟩
theorem nodup_finRange (n : ℕ) : (finRange n).Nodup := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact (Pairwise.pmap nodup_range _) fun _ _ _ _ => @Fin.ne_of_val_ne _ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩
@[simp]
theorem finRange_eq_nil {n : ℕ} : finRange n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero_iff, length_finRange]
theorem pairwise_lt_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (finRange n) := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact List.pairwise_lt_range.pmap (by simp) (by simp)
theorem pairwise_le_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (finRange n) := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact List.pairwise_le_range.pmap (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma count_finRange {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) : count a (finRange n) = 1 := by
simp [count_eq_of_nodup (nodup_finRange n)]
theorem get_finRange {n : ℕ} {i : ℕ} (h) :
(finRange n).get ⟨i, h⟩ = ⟨i, length_finRange (n := n) ▸ h⟩ := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem finRange_map_get (l : List α) : (finRange l.length).map l.get = l :=
List.ext_get (by simp) (by simp)
| @[simp]
theorem finRange_map_getElem (l : List α) : (finRange l.length).map (l[·.1]) = l :=
finRange_map_get l
@[simp] theorem idxOf_finRange {k : ℕ} (i : Fin k) : (finRange k).idxOf i = i := by
simpa using idxOf_getElem (nodup_finRange k) i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_finRange := idxOf_get
| Mathlib/Data/List/FinRange.lean | 64 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
| refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 809 | 811 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Group
/-!
# Isomorphisms of `R`-algebras
This file defines bundled isomorphisms of `R`-algebras.
## Main definitions
* `AlgEquiv R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra isomorphisms between `A` and `B`.
## Notations
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
/-- An equivalence of algebras (denoted as `A ≃ₐ[R] B`)
is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure AlgEquiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] extends A ≃ B, A ≃* B, A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
protected commutes' : ∀ r : R, toFun (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toAddEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toMulEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 A " ≃ₐ[" R "] " A' => AlgEquiv R A A'
/-- `AlgEquivClass F R A B` states that `F` is a type of algebra structure preserving
equivalences. You should extend this class when you extend `AlgEquiv`. -/
class AlgEquivClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] : Prop
extends RingEquivClass F A B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
namespace AlgEquivClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toAlgHomClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] :
AlgHomClass F R A B :=
{ h with }
instance (priority := 100) toLinearEquivClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
[Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] : LinearEquivClass F R A B :=
{ h with map_smulₛₗ := fun f => map_smulₛₗ f }
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AlgEquivClass F R A B` into an actual `AlgEquiv`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A ≃ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgEquiv {F R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] (f : F) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃ B), (f : A ≃+* B) with commutes' := commutes f }
instance (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] : CoeTC F (A ≃ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toAlgEquiv⟩
end AlgEquivClass
namespace AlgEquiv
universe uR uA₁ uA₂ uA₃ uA₁' uA₂' uA₃'
variable {R : Type uR}
variable {A₁ : Type uA₁} {A₂ : Type uA₂} {A₃ : Type uA₃}
variable {A₁' : Type uA₁'} {A₂' : Type uA₂'} {A₃' : Type uA₃'}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A₁] [Semiring A₂] [Semiring A₃]
variable [Semiring A₁'] [Semiring A₂'] [Semiring A₃']
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁'] [Algebra R A₂'] [Algebra R A₃']
variable (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
section coe
instance : EquivLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨f,_⟩,_⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨g,_⟩,_⟩ := g
congr
/-- Helper instance since the coercion is not always found. -/
instance : FunLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe := DFunLike.coe
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective'
instance : AlgEquivClass (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) R A₁ A₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
commutes f := f.commutes'
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
protected theorem congr_arg {f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} {x x' : A₁} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : f = g) (x : A₁) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {toEquiv map_mul map_add commutes} :
⇑(⟨toEquiv, map_mul, map_add, commutes⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = toEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨e, e', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = e :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_eq_coe : e.toEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_fun_injective : @Function.Injective (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ → A₂) fun e => (e : A₁ → A₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
instance hasCoeToRingEquiv : CoeOut (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
⟨AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃ A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toRingEquiv_eq_coe : e.toRingEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toRingEquiv_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ringEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv' : (e.toRingEquiv : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| RingEquiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to*Hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `AlgHomClass.coeTC` instance. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgHom : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
map_one' := map_one e
map_zero' := map_zero e }
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_eq_coe : e.toAlgHom = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algHom : DFunLike.coe (e.toAlgHom) = DFunLike.coe e :=
rfl
theorem coe_algHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| AlgHom.congr_fun h
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toAlgHom_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
/-- The two paths coercion can take to a `RingHom` are equivalent -/
theorem coe_ringHom_commutes : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem commutes : ∀ r : R, e (algebraMap R A₁ r) = algebraMap R A₂ r :=
e.commutes'
end coe
section bijective
protected theorem bijective : Function.Bijective e :=
EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective e :=
EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective : Function.Surjective e :=
EquivLike.surjective e
end bijective
section refl
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl]
def refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ (.refl _ : A₁ ≃+* A₁) with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
instance : Inhabited (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_toAlgHom : ↑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgHom.id R A₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = id :=
rfl
end refl
section symm
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ e.toRingEquiv.symm with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [← e.toRingEquiv.symm_apply_apply (algebraMap R A₁ r)]
congr
simp }
theorem invFun_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₂) :
f ((f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm x) = x :=
EquivLike.right_inv f x
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₁) :
(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm (f x) = x :=
EquivLike.left_inv f x
/-- `simp` normal form of `invFun_eq_symm` -/
@[simp]
theorem symm_toEquiv_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : (e : A₁ ≃ A₂).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe' (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, e, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective <| ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition to avoid looping in `dsimp` with `AlgEquiv.symm_mk`. -/
protected def symm_mk.aux (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :=
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm =
{ symm_mk.aux f f' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ with
toFun := f'
invFun := f } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).symm = AlgEquiv.refl :=
rfl
--this should be a simp lemma but causes a lint timeout
theorem toRingEquiv_symm (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) : (f : A₁ ≃+* A₁).symm = f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toRingEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toAddEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+ A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+ A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toMulEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ↑e.symm = AlgHom.id R A₂ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp ↑e.symm (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) = AlgHom.id R A₁ := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e :=
e.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e :=
e.right_inv
end symm
section simps
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ → A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.toEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ → A₁ :=
e.symm
initialize_simps_projections AlgEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
end simps
section trans
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₃ :=
{ e₁.toRingEquiv.trans e₂.toRingEquiv with
commutes' := fun r => show e₂.toFun (e₁.toFun _) = _ by rw [e₁.commutes', e₂.commutes'] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : ⇑(e₁.trans e₂) = e₂ ∘ e₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₁) : (e₁.trans e₂) x = e₂ (e₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm x = e₁.symm (e₂.symm x) :=
rfl
end trans
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ≃ (A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂') where
toFun f := (e₂.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.symm.toAlgHom
invFun f := (e₂.symm.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.toAlgHom
left_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, symm_comp]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, symm_comp, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
right_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, comp_symm]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, comp_symm, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
theorem arrowCongr_comp (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₃ : A₃ ≃ₐ[R] A₃') (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₃) :
arrowCongr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrowCongr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrowCongr e₁ e₂ f) := by
ext
simp only [arrowCongr, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, AlgHom.comp_apply]
congr
exact (e₂.symm_apply_apply _).symm
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_refl : arrowCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_symm (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(arrowCongr e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₂` and `A₁'` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁'` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₂ ≃ ₐ[R] A₂'`.
This is the `AlgEquiv` version of `AlgEquiv.arrowCongr`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivCongr (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') ≃ A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂' where
toFun ψ := e.symm.trans (ψ.trans e')
invFun ψ := e.trans (ψ.trans e'.symm)
left_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_refl : equivCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(equivCongr e e').symm = equivCongr e.symm e'.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_trans (e₁₂ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁₂' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂₃ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂₃' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
(equivCongr e₁₂ e₁₂').trans (equivCongr e₂₃ e₂₃') =
equivCongr (e₁₂.trans e₂₃) (e₁₂'.trans e₂₃') :=
rfl
/-- If an algebra morphism has an inverse, it is an algebra isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def ofAlgHom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ : f.comp g = AlgHom.id R A₂)
(h₂ : g.comp f = AlgHom.id R A₁) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ f with
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := AlgHom.ext_iff.1 h₂
right_inv := AlgHom.ext_iff.1 h₁ }
theorem coe_algHom_ofAlgHom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
↑(ofAlgHom f g h₁ h₂) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofAlgHom_coe_algHom (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
ofAlgHom (↑f) g h₁ h₂ = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem ofAlgHom_symm (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
(ofAlgHom f g h₁ h₂).symm = ofAlgHom g f h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
/-- Promotes a bijective algebra homomorphism to an algebra equivalence. -/
noncomputable def ofBijective (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (hf : Function.Bijective f) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ RingEquiv.ofBijective (f : A₁ →+* A₂) hf, f with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofBijective {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : Function.Bijective f} :
(AlgEquiv.ofBijective f hf : A₁ → A₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem ofBijective_apply {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : Function.Bijective f} (a : A₁) :
(AlgEquiv.ofBijective f hf) a = f a :=
rfl
/-- Forgetting the multiplicative structures, an equivalence of algebras is a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def toLinearEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
toFun := e
map_smul' := map_smul e
invFun := e.symm }
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_refl : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).toLinearEquiv = LinearEquiv.refl R A₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.toLinearEquiv.symm = e.symm.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).toLinearEquiv = e₁.toLinearEquiv.trans e₂.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
theorem toLinearEquiv_injective : Function.Injective (toLinearEquiv : _ → A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| LinearEquiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as a linear map. -/
def toLinearMap : A₁ →ₗ[R] A₂ :=
e.toAlgHom.toLinearMap
|
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_toLinearMap : (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂).toLinearMap = e.toLinearMap :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Equiv.lean | 512 | 514 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
/-!
# Tensor Product of (multivariate) polynomial rings
Let `Semiring R`, `Algebra R S` and `Module R N`.
* `MvPolynomial.rTensor` gives the linear equivalence
`MvPolynomial σ S ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ (S ⊗[R] N)` characterized,
for `p : MvPolynomial σ S`, `n : N` and `d : σ →₀ ℕ`, by
`rTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = (coeff d p) ⊗ₜ[R] n`
* `MvPolynomial.scalarRTensor` gives the linear equivalence
`MvPolynomial σ R ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ N`
such that `MvPolynomial.scalarRTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = coeff d p • n`
for `p : MvPolynomial σ R`, `n : N` and `d : σ →₀ ℕ`, by
* `MvPolynomial.rTensorAlgHom`, the algebra morphism from the tensor product
of a polynomial algebra by an algebra to a polynomial algebra
* `MvPolynomial.rTensorAlgEquiv`, `MvPolynomial.scalarRTensorAlgEquiv`,
the tensor product of a polynomial algebra by an algebra
is algebraically equivalent to a polynomial algebra
## TODO :
* `MvPolynomial.rTensor` could be phrased in terms of `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and
`MvPolynomial.rTensor` then has `smul` by the polynomial algebra.
* `MvPolynomial.rTensorAlgHom` and `MvPolynomial.scalarRTensorAlgEquiv`
are morphisms for the algebra structure by `MvPolynomial σ R`.
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open DirectSum TensorProduct
open Set LinearMap Submodule
variable {R : Type u} {N : Type v} [CommSemiring R]
variable {σ : Type*}
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
section Module
variable [DecidableEq σ]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
/-- The tensor product of a polynomial ring by a module is
linearly equivalent to a Finsupp of a tensor product -/
noncomputable def rTensor :
MvPolynomial σ S ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[S] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ (S ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft' _ _ _ _ _
lemma rTensor_apply_tmul (p : MvPolynomial σ S) (n : N) :
rTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) = p.sum (fun i m ↦ Finsupp.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] n)) :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft_apply_tmul p n
lemma rTensor_apply_tmul_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ S) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
rTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = (coeff d p) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft_apply_tmul_apply p n d
lemma rTensor_apply_monomial_tmul (e : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : S) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
rTensor (monomial e s ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = if e = d then s ⊗ₜ[R] n else 0 := by
simp only [rTensor_apply_tmul_apply, coeff_monomial, ite_tmul]
lemma rTensor_apply_X_tmul (s : σ) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
rTensor (X s ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = if Finsupp.single s 1 = d then (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] n else 0 := by
rw [rTensor_apply_tmul_apply, coeff_X', ite_tmul]
lemma rTensor_apply (t : MvPolynomial σ S ⊗[R] N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
rTensor t d = ((lcoeff S d).restrictScalars R).rTensor N t :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft_apply t d
@[simp]
lemma rTensor_symm_apply_single (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : S) (n : N) :
rTensor.symm (Finsupp.single d (s ⊗ₜ n)) =
(monomial d s) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft_symm_apply_single (R := R) d s n
/-- The tensor product of the polynomial algebra by a module
is linearly equivalent to a Finsupp of that module -/
noncomputable def scalarRTensor :
MvPolynomial σ R ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ N :=
TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft _ _ _
lemma scalarRTensor_apply_tmul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : N) :
scalarRTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) = p.sum (fun i m ↦ Finsupp.single i (m • n)) :=
TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft_apply_tmul p n
lemma scalarRTensor_apply_tmul_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
scalarRTensor (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = coeff d p • n :=
TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft_apply_tmul_apply p n d
lemma scalarRTensor_apply_monomial_tmul (e : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
scalarRTensor (monomial e r ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = if e = d then r • n else 0 := by
rw [scalarRTensor_apply_tmul_apply, coeff_monomial, ite_smul, zero_smul]
lemma scalarRTensor_apply_X_tmul_apply (s : σ) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
scalarRTensor (X s ⊗ₜ[R] n) d = if Finsupp.single s 1 = d then n else 0 := by
rw [scalarRTensor_apply_tmul_apply, coeff_X', ite_smul, one_smul, zero_smul]
lemma scalarRTensor_symm_apply_single (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (n : N) :
scalarRTensor.symm (Finsupp.single d n) = (monomial d 1) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft_symm_apply_single d n
end Module
section Algebra
variable [CommSemiring N] [Algebra R N]
/-- The algebra morphism from a tensor product of a polynomial algebra
by an algebra to a polynomial algebra -/
noncomputable def rTensorAlgHom :
(MvPolynomial σ S) ⊗[R] N →ₐ[S] MvPolynomial σ (S ⊗[R] N) :=
Algebra.TensorProduct.lift
(mapAlgHom Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft)
((IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (S ⊗[R] N) _).comp Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight)
(fun p n => by simp [commute_iff_eq, algebraMap_eq, mul_comm])
@[simp]
lemma coeff_rTensorAlgHom_tmul
(p : MvPolynomial σ S) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff d (rTensorAlgHom (p ⊗ₜ[R] n)) = (coeff d p) ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
rw [rTensorAlgHom, Algebra.TensorProduct.lift_tmul]
rw [AlgHom.coe_comp, IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', Function.comp_apply,
Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq, mul_comm, coeff_C_mul]
simp [mapAlgHom, coeff_map]
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq σ]
lemma coeff_rTensorAlgHom_monomial_tmul
| (e : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : S) (n : N) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff d (rTensorAlgHom (monomial e s ⊗ₜ[R] n)) =
if e = d then s ⊗ₜ[R] n else 0 := by
simp [ite_tmul]
lemma rTensorAlgHom_toLinearMap :
(rTensorAlgHom :
MvPolynomial σ S ⊗[R] N →ₐ[S] MvPolynomial σ (S ⊗[R] N)).toLinearMap =
rTensor.toLinearMap := by
ext d n e
dsimp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/MvPolynomial.lean | 150 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Miscellaneous lemmas about the integers
This file contains lemmas about integers, which require further imports than
`Data.Int.Basic` or `Data.Int.Order`.
-/
open Nat
namespace Int
theorem le_natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : (m - n : ℤ) ≤ ↑(m - n : ℕ) := by
by_cases h : m ≥ n
· exact le_of_eq (Int.ofNat_sub h).symm
· simp [le_of_not_ge h, ofNat_le]
/-! ### `succ` and `pred` -/
theorem succ_natCast_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : ℤ) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.mpr (by simp)
/-! ### `natAbs` -/
theorem natAbs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs = b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq
theorem natAbs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs < b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
| exact natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt
theorem natAbs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs ≤ b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 := by
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Lemmas.lean | 45 | 47 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
· exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) (hs : I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a)
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) : s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi] at hs; exact mem_of_pi_mem_pi hs hi
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ 𝓝 (x a)) : pi i s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_mem hi]
exact fun a ha => (continuous_apply a).continuousAt (hs a ha)
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) :
I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ I → s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi, pi_mem_pi_iff hI]
theorem interior_pi_set {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
interior (pi I s) = I.pi fun i => interior (s i) := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_pi, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hI]
theorem exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds [DecidableEq ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (y : ∀ a, π a) : ∃ I : Finset ι, I.piecewise x y ∈ s := by
simp only [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi'] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨I, t, htx, hts⟩
refine ⟨I, hts fun i hi => ?_⟩
simpa [Finset.mem_coe.1 hi] using mem_of_mem_nhds (htx i)
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom
{ t | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi (↑i) s } := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· apply le_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨s, i, hi, rfl⟩
letI := fun a => generateFrom (g a)
exact isOpen_set_pi i.finite_toSet (fun a ha => GenerateOpen.basic _ (hi a ha))
· classical
refine le_iInf fun i => coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun s hs => ?_
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨update (fun i => univ) i s, {i}, ?_⟩
simp [hs]
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom :
Pi.topologicalSpace =
generateFrom
{ g | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) ∧ g = pi (↑i) s } :=
calc Pi.topologicalSpace
_ = @Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun _ => generateFrom { s | IsOpen s } := by
simp only [generateFrom_setOf_isOpen]
_ = _ := pi_generateFrom_eq
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq_finite {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} [Finite ι]
(hg : ∀ a, ⋃₀ g a = univ) :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s } := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [pi_generateFrom_eq]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti ?_) (le_generateFrom ?_)
· exact fun s ⟨t, ht, Eq⟩ => ⟨t, Finset.univ, by simp [ht, Eq]⟩
· rintro s ⟨t, i, ht, rfl⟩
letI := generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s }
refine isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.2 fun f hf => ?_
choose c hcg hfc using fun a => sUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (hg a) (f a)
refine ⟨pi i t ∩ pi ((↑i)ᶜ : Set ι) c, inter_subset_left, ?_, ⟨hf, fun a _ => hfc a⟩⟩
classical
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise]
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩
by_cases a ∈ i <;> simp [*]
theorem induced_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : X → ∀ i, π i) :
induced f Pi.topologicalSpace = ⨅ i, induced (f · i) inferInstance := by
simp_rw [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, Function.comp_def]
/-- Suppose `π i` is a family of topological spaces indexed by `i : ι`, and `X` is a type
endowed with a family of maps `f i : X → π i` for every `i : ι`, hence inducing a
map `g : X → Π i, π i`. This lemma shows that infimum of the topologies on `X` induced by
the `f i` as `i : ι` varies is simply the topology on `X` induced by `g : X → Π i, π i`
where `Π i, π i` is endowed with the usual product topology. -/
theorem inducing_iInf_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : ∀ i, X → π i) :
@IsInducing X (∀ i, π i) (⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance) _ fun x i => f i x :=
letI := ⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance; ⟨(induced_to_pi _).symm⟩
variable [Finite ι] [∀ i, DiscreteTopology (π i)]
/-- A finite product of discrete spaces is discrete. -/
instance Pi.discreteTopology : DiscreteTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp fun x => by
rw [← univ_pi_singleton]
exact isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (isOpen_discrete {x i})
end Pi
section Sigma
variable {ι κ : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} {τ : κ → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (σ i)]
[∀ k, TopologicalSpace (τ k)] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Continuous (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
continuous_iSup_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem isOpen_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [isOpen_iSup_iff]
rfl
theorem isClosed_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sigma_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isOpen_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isOpen_empty
theorem isOpen_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpen (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isOpenMap_sigmaMk.isOpen_range
theorem isClosedMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isClosed_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isClosed_empty
theorem isClosed_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosed (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isClosedMap_sigmaMk.isClosed_range
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isOpenMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isOpenMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isClosedMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isClosedMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isClosedEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigmaMk := IsEmbedding.sigmaMk
theorem Sigma.nhds_mk (i : ι) (x : σ i) : 𝓝 (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma σ) = Filter.map (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 x) :=
(IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk.map_nhds_eq x).symm
theorem Sigma.nhds_eq (x : Sigma σ) : 𝓝 x = Filter.map (Sigma.mk x.1) (𝓝 x.2) := by
cases x
apply Sigma.nhds_mk
theorem comap_sigmaMk_nhds (i : ι) (x : σ i) : comap (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 ⟨i, x⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
(IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.nhds_eq_comap _).symm
theorem isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage (s : Set ι) : IsOpen (Sigma.fst ⁻¹' s : Set (Σ a, σ a)) := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
simp only [← range_sigmaMk]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_range_sigmaMk
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous iff its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sigma_iff {f : Sigma σ → X} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [continuous_iSup_dom]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => continuous_coinduced_dom
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous if its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_sigma_iff.2 hf
/-- A map defined on a sigma type (a.k.a. the disjoint union of an indexed family of topological
spaces) is inducing iff its restriction to each component is inducing and each the image of each
component under `f` can be separated from the images of all other components by an open set. -/
theorem inducing_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} :
IsInducing f ↔ (∀ i, IsInducing (f ∘ Sigma.mk i)) ∧
(∀ i, ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ U ↔ x.1 = i) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ h.comp IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.1, fun i ↦ ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases h.isOpen_iff.1 (isOpen_range_sigmaMk (i := i)) with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
refine ⟨U, hUo, ?_⟩
simpa [Set.ext_iff] using hU
· refine fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ isInducing_iff_nhds.2 fun ⟨i, x⟩ ↦ ?_
rw [Sigma.nhds_mk, (h₁ i).nhds_eq_comap, comp_apply, ← comap_comap, map_comap_of_mem]
rcases h₂ i with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap <| hUo.mem_nhds <| (hU _).2 rfl] with y hy
simpa [hU] using hy
@[simp 1100]
theorem continuous_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i) :=
continuous_sigma_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Sigma.map, IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.continuous_iff, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i)) :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) :=
continuous_sigma_map.2 hf
theorem isOpenMap_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_eq, map_map, comp_def]
theorem isOpenMap_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
IsOpenMap (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f₂ i) :=
isOpenMap_sigma.trans <|
forall_congr' fun i => (@IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk _ _ _ (f₁ i)).isOpenMap_iff.symm
lemma Topology.isInducing_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h₁ : Injective f₁) : IsInducing (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsInducing (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isInducing_iff_nhds, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_mk, Sigma.map_mk,
← map_sigma_mk_comap h₁, map_inj sigma_mk_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_sigma_map := isInducing_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h : Injective f₁) : IsEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isEmbedding_iff, Injective.sigma_map, isInducing_sigmaMap h, forall_and,
h.sigma_map_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigma_map := isEmbedding_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h : Injective f₁) :
IsOpenEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isOpenEmbedding_iff_isEmbedding_isOpenMap, isOpenMap_sigma_map, isEmbedding_sigmaMap h,
forall_and]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigma_map := isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap
end Sigma
section ULift
theorem ULift.isOpen_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [ULift.topologicalSpace, ← Equiv.ulift_apply, ← Equiv.ulift.coinduced_symm, ← isOpen_coinduced]
theorem ULift.isClosed_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, preimage_compl]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftDown [TopologicalSpace X] : Continuous (ULift.down : ULift.{v, u} X → X) :=
continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftUp [TopologicalSpace X] : Continuous (ULift.up : X → ULift.{v, u} X) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 continuous_id
| @[deprecated (since := "2025-02-10")] alias continuous_uLift_down := continuous_uliftDown
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-10")] alias continuous_uLift_up := continuous_uliftUp
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,158 | 1,160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.InitTail
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `TruncatedWittVector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `TruncatedWittVector.instCommRing`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `WittVector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `TruncatedWittVector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `WittVector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open Function (Injective Surjective)
noncomputable section
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
/-- A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`TruncatedWittVector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `TruncatedWittVector p n R`.
(`TruncatedWittVector p₁ n R` and `TruncatedWittVector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def TruncatedWittVector (_ : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) :=
Fin n → R
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
variable {n R}
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable (p) in
/-- Create a `TruncatedWittVector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : Fin n → R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
x
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : R :=
x i
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (x : Fin n → R) (i : Fin n) : (mk p x).coeff i = x i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeff (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : (mk p fun i => x.coeff i) = x := by
ext i; rw [coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun i => if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) (i : Fin n) : x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [out]; dsimp only; rw [dif_pos i.is_lt, Fin.eta]
theorem out_injective : Injective (@out p n R _) := by
intro x y h
ext i
rw [WittVector.ext_iff] at h
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
variable (n)
section
/-- `truncateFun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `TruncatedWittVector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `WittVector.truncate` -/
def truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
TruncatedWittVector.mk p fun i => x.coeff i
end
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncateFun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [truncateFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem out_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : (truncateFun n x).out = init n x := by
ext i
dsimp [TruncatedWittVector.out, init, select, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi; swap; · rfl
rw [coeff_truncateFun, Fin.val_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : x.out.truncateFun n = x := by
simp only [WittVector.truncateFun, coeff_out, mk_coeff]
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Zero (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 0⟩
instance : One (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 1⟩
instance : NatCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : IntCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : Add (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out + y.out)⟩
instance : Mul (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out * y.out)⟩
instance : Neg (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x => truncateFun n (-x.out)⟩
instance : Sub (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out - y.out)⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (TruncatedWittVector p n R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x m => truncateFun n (x.out ^ m)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (i : Fin n) : (0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R).coeff i = 0 := by
show coeff i (truncateFun _ 0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R) = 0
rw [coeff_truncateFun, WittVector.zero_coeff]
end TruncatedWittVector
/-- A macro tactic used to prove that `truncateFun` respects ring operations. -/
macro (name := witt_truncateFun_tac) "witt_truncateFun_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ show _ = WittVector.truncateFun n _
apply TruncatedWittVector.out_injective
iterate rw [WittVector.out_truncateFun]
first
| rw [WittVector.init_add]
| rw [WittVector.init_mul]
| rw [WittVector.init_neg]
| rw [WittVector.init_sub]
| rw [WittVector.init_nsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_zsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_pow]})
namespace WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
theorem truncateFun_surjective : Surjective (@truncateFun p n R) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective TruncatedWittVector.truncateFun_out
variable [Fact p.Prime]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_zero : truncateFun n (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_one : truncateFun n (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := rfl
variable {p R}
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_add (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x + y) = truncateFun n x + truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x * y) = truncateFun n x * truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_neg (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (-x) = -truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_sub (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x - y) = truncateFun n x - truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_nsmul (m : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_zsmul (m : ℤ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_pow (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (x ^ m) = truncateFun n x ^ m := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_natCast (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
|
theorem truncateFun_intCast (m : ℤ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Truncated.lean | 253 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n + p) :=
monic_of_degree_le n
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H, add_zero])
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic :=
monic_X_pow_add <| (lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le
(by simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true]))
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
namespace Monic
lemma comp (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (h : q.natDegree ≠ 0) : (p.comp q).Monic := by
nontriviality R
have : (p.comp q).natDegree = p.natDegree * q.natDegree :=
natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero <| by simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
rw [Monic.def, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, this, coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree h, hp.leadingCoeff,
hq.leadingCoeff, one_pow, mul_one]
lemma comp_X_add_C (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X + C r)).Monic := by
nontriviality R
refine hp.comp (monic_X_add_C _) fun ha ↦ ?_
rw [natDegree_X_add_C] at ha
exact one_ne_zero ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
theorem nextCoeff_mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) :
nextCoeff (p * q) = nextCoeff p + nextCoeff q := by
nontriviality
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse]
rw [reverse_mul] <;> simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff, mul_coeff_one, add_comm]
theorem nextCoeff_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).nextCoeff = n • p.nextCoeff := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, zero_smul, ← map_one (f := C), nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).nextCoeff_mul hp, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : p.Monic)
(map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
have hdeg : p.degree = 0 := by
rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one]
· rw [hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
have hndeg : p.natDegree = 0 :=
WithBot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_natDegree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg)
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg
rw [← hndeg, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, hp.leadingCoeff, C.map_one]
theorem natDegree_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).natDegree = n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).natDegree_mul hp, hn, Nat.succ_mul, add_comm]
end Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow_X_add_C [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) : ((X + C r) ^ n).natDegree = n := by
rw [(monic_X_add_C r).natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one]
theorem Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit (hm : Monic p) (hpu : IsUnit p) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv
have := hm.natDegree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h)
rw [h, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero] at this
exact hm.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1
theorem Monic.isUnit_iff (hm : p.Monic) : IsUnit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one⟩
theorem eq_of_monic_of_associated (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : Associated p q) : p = q := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hpq
rw [(hp.of_mul_monic_left hq).eq_one_of_isUnit u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (ht : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (t.map f).prod := by
revert ht
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_; · simp
intro a t ih ht
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons]
exact (ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul (ih fun _ hi => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi))
theorem monic_prod_of_monic (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic s.1 f hs
theorem monic_finprod_of_monic (α : Type*) (f : α → R[X])
(hf : ∀ i ∈ Function.mulSupport f, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (finprod f) := by
classical
rw [finprod_def]
split_ifs
· exact monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a ha => hf a ((Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _).mp ha)
· exact monic_one
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (t.map f).prod = (t.map fun i => nextCoeff (f i)).sum := by
revert h
refine Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t ih ht => ?_
· simp only [Multiset.not_mem_zero, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false, Multiset.map_zero,
Multiset.prod_zero, Multiset.sum_zero, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff]
rw [← C_1]
rw [nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Monic.nextCoeff_mul, ih]
exacts [fun i hi => ht i (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi), ht a (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _),
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun b bs => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem bs)]
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, nextCoeff (f i) :=
Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod s.1 f h
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
lemma irreducible_of_monic (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h f g hf hg hp => (h.2 hp.symm).imp hf.eq_one_of_isUnit hg.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h =>
⟨hp1 ∘ hp.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun f g hfg =>
(h (g * C f.leadingCoeff) (f * C g.leadingCoeff) ?_ ?_ ?_).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f _)
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one g _)⟩⟩
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, mul_comm, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← C_mul, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, mul_one,
mul_comm, ← hfg]
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree (hp : p.Monic) :
Irreducible p ↔
p ≠ 1 ∧ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f.natDegree = 0 ∨ g.natDegree = 0 := by
by_cases hp1 : p = 1; · simp [hp1]
rw [irreducible_of_monic hp hp1, and_iff_right hp1]
refine forall₄_congr fun a b ha hb => ?_
rw [ha.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, hb.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree' (hp : p.Monic) : Irreducible p ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧
∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → g.natDegree ∉ Ioc 0 (p.natDegree / 2) := by
simp_rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree, mem_Ioc, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le zero_lt_two, mul_two]
apply and_congr_right'
constructor <;> intro h f g hf hg he <;> subst he
· rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact fun ha => (h f g hf hg rfl).elim (ha.1.trans_le ha.2).ne' ha.1.ne'
· simp_rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
contrapose! h
obtain hl | hl := le_total f.natDegree g.natDegree
· exact ⟨g, f, hg, hf, mul_comm g f, h.1, add_le_add_left hl _⟩
· exact ⟨f, g, hf, hg, rfl, h.2, add_le_add_right hl _⟩
/-- Alternate phrasing of `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree'` where we only have to check
one divisor at a time. -/
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, Monic q → natDegree q ∈ Finset.Ioc 0 (natDegree p / 2) → ¬ q ∣ p := by
rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right hp1]
constructor
· rintro h g hg hdg ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact h f g (hg.of_mul_monic_left hp) hg (mul_comm f g) hdg
· rintro h f g - hg rfl hdg
exact h g hg hdg (dvd_mul_left g f)
lemma Monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 2) :
¬Irreducible p ↔ ∃ c₁ c₂, p.coeff 0 = c₁ * c₂ ∧ p.coeff 1 = c₁ + c₂ := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [natDegree_of_subsingleton] at hnd
rw [hm.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right, hnd]
· push_neg
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl, hdb⟩
simp only [zero_lt_two, Nat.div_self, Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, zero_add, mem_singleton] at hdb
have hda := hnd
rw [ha.natDegree_mul hb, hdb] at hda
use a.coeff 0, b.coeff 0, mul_coeff_zero a b
simpa only [nextCoeff, hnd, add_right_cancel hda, hdb] using ha.nextCoeff_mul hb
· rintro ⟨c₁, c₂, hmul, hadd⟩
refine
⟨X + C c₁, X + C c₂, monic_X_add_C _, monic_X_add_C _, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, hnd, Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Finset.sum_range_one, ← hnd, hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, hmul, hadd, C_mul, C_add, C_1]
ring
· rw [mem_Ioc, natDegree_X_add_C _]
simp
· rintro rfl
simp [natDegree_one] at hnd
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem Monic.natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).natDegree = P.natDegree := by
refine le_antisymm natDegree_map_le (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_)
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem Monic.degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).degree = P.degree := by
by_cases hP : P = 0
· simp [hP]
· refine le_antisymm degree_map_le ?_
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hP]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
section Injective
open Function
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
theorem degree_map_eq_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [← f.map_zero]; exact mt hf.eq_iff.1 (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h))
theorem natDegree_map_eq_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p)
theorem leadingCoeff_map' (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
theorem nextCoeff_map (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).nextCoeff = f p.nextCoeff := by
unfold nextCoeff
rw [natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
delta leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map f, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
theorem monic_of_injective (hf : Injective f) {p : R[X]} (hp : (p.map f).Monic) : p.Monic := by
apply hf
rw [← leadingCoeff_of_injective hf, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.monic_map_iff (hf : Injective f) {p : R[X]} :
p.Monic ↔ (p.map f).Monic :=
⟨Monic.map _, Polynomial.monic_of_injective hf⟩
end Injective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_X_sub_C (x : R) : Monic (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using monic_X_add_C (-x)
theorem monic_X_pow_sub {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n - p) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add (show degree (-p) < n by rwa [← degree_neg p] at H)
/-- `X ^ n - a` is monic. -/
theorem monic_X_pow_sub_C {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n - C a).Monic := by
simpa only [map_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add_C (-a) h
theorem not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one (R : Type*) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
¬IsUnit (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]) := by
intro h
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp at h
apply hn
rw [← @natDegree_one R, ← (monic_X_pow_sub_C _ hn).eq_one_of_isUnit h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
lemma Monic.comp_X_sub_C {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X - C r)).Monic := by
simpa using hp.comp_X_add_C (-r)
theorem Monic.sub_of_left {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
Monic (p - q) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply hp.add_of_left
rwa [degree_neg]
theorem Monic.sub_of_right {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.leadingCoeff = -1) (hpq : degree p < degree q) :
Monic (p - q) := by
have : (-q).coeff (-q).natDegree = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_neg, coeff_neg, show q.coeff q.natDegree = -1 from hq, neg_neg]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply Monic.add_of_right this
rwa [degree_neg]
end Ring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem not_monic_zero : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) :=
not_monic_zero_iff.mp zero_ne_one
end NonzeroSemiring
section NotZeroDivisor
-- TODO: using gh-8537, rephrase lemmas that involve commutation around `*` using the op-ring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem Monic.mul_left_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : q * p ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or, degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
theorem Monic.mul_right_ne_zero (hp : Monic p) {q : R[X]} (hq : q ≠ 0) : p * q ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· simpa [h]
rw [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, hp.degree_mul_comm, hp.degree_mul, WithBot.add_eq_bot, not_or,
degree_eq_bot]
refine ⟨hq, ?_⟩
rw [← hp.degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one, not_le] at h
refine (lt_trans ?_ h).ne'
simp
theorem Monic.mul_natDegree_lt_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} :
(p * q).natDegree < p.natDegree ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· suffices 0 < p.natDegree ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 by simpa [hq, ← h.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
exact ⟨fun h => h.ne', fun h => lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) h.symm⟩
· simp [h.natDegree_mul', hq]
theorem Monic.mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_right_ne_zero, hq]
theorem Monic.mul_left_eq_zero_iff (h : Monic p) {q : R[X]} : q * p = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
by_cases hq : q = 0 <;> simp [h.mul_left_ne_zero, hq]
theorem Monic.isRegular {R : Type*} [Ring R] {p : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) : IsRegular p := by
constructor
· intro q r h
dsimp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_right_eq_zero_iff, mul_sub, h, sub_self]
· intro q r h
simp only at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← hp.mul_left_eq_zero_iff, sub_mul, h, sub_self]
theorem degree_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {k : S}
(p : R[X]) (h : IsSMulRegular R k) : (k • p).degree = p.degree := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro m hm
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
simp [hm m le_rfl]
· rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro m hm
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero] at hm
refine h ?_
simpa using hm m le_rfl
theorem natDegree_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {k : S}
(p : R[X]) (h : IsSMulRegular R k) : (k • p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree hp, ← degree_eq_natDegree,
degree_smul_of_smul_regular p h]
contrapose! hp
rw [← smul_zero k] at hp
exact h.polynomial hp
theorem leadingCoeff_smul_of_smul_regular {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {k : S}
(p : R[X]) (h : IsSMulRegular R k) : (k • p).leadingCoeff = k • p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_smul,
| natDegree_smul_of_smul_regular p h]
theorem monic_of_isUnit_leadingCoeff_inv_smul (h : IsUnit p.leadingCoeff) :
Monic (h.unit⁻¹ • p) := by
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_smul_of_smul_regular _ (isSMulRegular_of_group _), Units.smul_def]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h
simp only [← hk, smul_eq_mul, ← Units.val_mul, Units.val_eq_one, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul]
simp [Units.ext_iff, IsUnit.unit_spec]
theorem isUnit_leadingCoeff_mul_right_eq_zero_iff (h : IsUnit p.leadingCoeff) {q : R[X]} :
p * q = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 551 | 561 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
theorem prodMap_image_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set α) (t : Set γ) :
(Prod.map f g) '' (s ×ˢ t) = (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' t) := by
ext
aesop
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_prod, singleton_prod]
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, prod_union, prod_singleton]
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
theorem mapsTo_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : MapsTo Prod.swap (s ×ˢ t) (t ×ˢ s) :=
fun _ ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨hy, hx⟩
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prodMap {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")] alias range_prod_map := range_prodMap
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prodMap]
apply range_comp_subset_range
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod := image_prodMk_subset_prod
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left := image_prodMk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right := image_prodMk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_fst_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.fst (s ×ˢ t) s :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).1
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_snd_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.snd (s ×ˢ t) t :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).2
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true, or_iff_left_iff_imp, or_false]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem subset_prod {s : Set (α × β)} : s ⊆ (Prod.fst '' s) ×ˢ (Prod.snd '' s) :=
fun _ hp ↦ mem_prod.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint : s ×ˢ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
prod_subset_iff.trans disjoint_iff_forall_ne.symm
@[simp]
theorem diag_preimage_prod (s t : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
theorem diag_preimage_prod_self (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s = s :=
inter_self s
theorem diag_image (s : Set α) : (fun x => (x, x)) '' s = diagonal α ∩ s ×ˢ s := by
rw [← range_diag, ← image_preimage_eq_range_inter, diag_preimage_prod_self]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ_iff : diagonal α = univ ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, eq_univ_iff_forall, Prod.forall, mem_diagonal_iff]
theorem diagonal_eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : diagonal α = univ := diagonal_eq_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
end Diagonal
/-- A function is `Function.const α a` for some `a` if and only if `∀ x y, f x = f y`. -/
theorem range_const_eq_diagonal {α β : Type*} [hβ : Nonempty β] :
range (const α) = {f : α → β | ∀ x y, f x = f y} := by
refine (range_eq_iff _ _).mpr ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun f hf ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with h|⟨⟨a⟩⟩
· exact hβ.elim fun b ↦ ⟨b, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· exact ⟨f a, funext fun x ↦ hf _ _⟩
end Set
section Pullback
open Set
variable {X Y Z}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y Z$. -/
abbrev Function.Pullback (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) := {p : X × Z // f p.1 = g p.2}
/-- The fiber product $X \times_Y X$. -/
abbrev Function.PullbackSelf (f : X → Y) := f.Pullback f
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the first factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : X := p.val.1
/-- The projection from the fiber product to the second factor. -/
def Function.Pullback.snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} (p : f.Pullback g) : Z := p.val.2
open Function.Pullback in
lemma Function.pullback_comm_sq (f : X → Y) (g : Z → Y) :
f ∘ @fst X Y Z f g = g ∘ @snd X Y Z f g := funext fun p ↦ p.2
/-- The diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X \times_Y X$. -/
@[simps]
def toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (x : X) : f.Pullback f := ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
/-- The diagonal $\Delta(X) \subseteq X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.pullbackDiagonal (f : X → Y) : Set (f.Pullback f) := {p | p.fst = p.snd}
/-- Three functions between the three pairs of spaces $X_i, Y_i, Z_i$ that are compatible
induce a function $X_1 \times_{Y_1} Z_1 \to X_2 \times_{Y_2} Z_2$. -/
def Function.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
(mapX : X₁ → X₂) (mapY : Y₁ → Y₂) (mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂)
(commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁) (commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁)
(p : f₁.Pullback g₁) : f₂.Pullback g₂ :=
⟨(mapX p.fst, mapZ p.snd),
(congr_fun commX _).trans <| (congr_arg mapY p.2).trans <| congr_fun commZ.symm _⟩
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_Z (X \times_Y Z) \to X \times_Y X$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_fst {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@snd X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → f.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback fst g fst (pullback_comm_sq f g) (pullback_comm_sq f g)
open Function.Pullback in
/-- The projection $(X \times_Y Z) \times_X (X \times_Y Z) \to Z \times_Y Z$. -/
def Function.PullbackSelf.map_snd {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
(@fst X Y Z f g).PullbackSelf → g.PullbackSelf :=
mapPullback snd f snd (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm (pullback_comm_sq f g).symm
open Function.PullbackSelf Function.Pullback
theorem preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → Y} :
@map_fst X Y Z f g ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (@snd X Y Z f g) := by
ext ⟨⟨p₁, p₂⟩, he⟩
simp_rw [pullbackDiagonal, mem_setOf, Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff]
exact (and_iff_left he).symm
theorem Function.Injective.preimage_pullbackDiagonal {f : X → Y} {g : Z → X} (inj : g.Injective) :
mapPullback g id g (by rfl) (by rfl) ⁻¹' pullbackDiagonal f = pullbackDiagonal (f ∘ g) :=
ext fun _ ↦ inj.eq_iff
theorem image_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) (s : Set X) :
toPullbackDiag f '' s = pullbackDiagonal f ∩ Subtype.val ⁻¹' s ×ˢ s := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, hx, hx⟩
· obtain ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := x
rintro ⟨rfl : x = y, h2x⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h2x.1
theorem range_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : range (toPullbackDiag f) = pullbackDiagonal f := by
rw [← image_univ, image_toPullbackDiag, univ_prod_univ, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
theorem injective_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : (toPullbackDiag f).Injective :=
fun _ _ h ↦ congr_arg Prod.fst (congr_arg Subtype.val h)
end Pullback
namespace Set
section OffDiag
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem offDiag_mono : Monotone (offDiag : Set α → Set (α × α)) := fun _ _ h _ =>
And.imp (@h _) <| And.imp_left <| @h _
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_nonempty : s.offDiag.Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [offDiag, Set.Nonempty, Set.Nontrivial]
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_eq_empty : s.offDiag = ∅ ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← not_nontrivial_iff, offDiag_nonempty.not]
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.offDiag_nonempty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
alias ⟨_, Subsingleton.offDiag_eq_empty⟩ := offDiag_nonempty
variable (s t)
theorem offDiag_subset_prod : s.offDiag ⊆ s ×ˢ s := fun _ hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1⟩
theorem offDiag_eq_sep_prod : s.offDiag = { x ∈ s ×ˢ s | x.1 ≠ x.2 } :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc.symm
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_empty : (∅ : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).offDiag = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem offDiag_univ : (univ : Set α).offDiag = (diagonal α)ᶜ :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_sdiff_diagonal : s ×ˢ s \ diagonal α = s.offDiag :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_diagonal_offDiag : Disjoint (diagonal α) s.offDiag :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hd ho => ho.2.2 hd
theorem offDiag_inter : (s ∩ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∩ t.offDiag :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_inter_iff]
tauto
variable {s t}
theorem offDiag_union (h : Disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ t.offDiag ∪ s ×ˢ t ∪ t ×ˢ s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_offDiag, mem_union, ne_eq, mem_prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0|h0, h1|h1, h2⟩ <;> simp [h0, h1, h2]
· rintro (((⟨h0, h1, h2⟩|⟨h0, h1, h2⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩)|⟨h0, h1⟩) <;> simp [*]
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact Set.disjoint_left.mp h h0 h1
· rintro h3
rw [h3] at h0
exact (Set.disjoint_right.mp h h0 h1).elim
theorem offDiag_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).offDiag = s.offDiag ∪ {a} ×ˢ s ∪ s ×ˢ {a} := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, offDiag_union, offDiag_singleton, union_empty, union_right_comm]
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro b hb (rfl : b = a)
exact ha hb
end OffDiag
/-! ### Cartesian set-indexed product of sets -/
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α β : ι → Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem empty_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by
ext
simp [pi]
theorem subsingleton_univ_pi (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Subsingleton) :
(univ.pi t).Subsingleton := fun _f hf _g hg ↦ funext fun i ↦
(ht i) (hf _ <| mem_univ _) (hg _ <| mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ (s : Set ι) : (pi s fun i => (univ : Set (α i))) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ _ _ => mem_univ _
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_ite (s : Set ι) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi univ fun i => if i ∈ s then t i else univ) = s.pi t := by
ext; simp_rw [Set.mem_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i; split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem pi_mono (h : ∀ i ∈ s, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : pi s t₁ ⊆ pi s t₂ := fun _ hx i hi => h i hi <| hx i hi
theorem pi_inter_distrib : (s.pi fun i => t i ∩ t₁ i) = s.pi t ∩ s.pi t₁ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [forall_and, mem_pi, mem_inter_iff]
theorem pi_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s₁, t₁ i = t₂ i) : s₁.pi t₁ = s₂.pi t₂ :=
h ▸ ext fun _ => forall₂_congr fun i hi => h' i hi ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem pi_eq_empty (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : t i = ∅) : s.pi t = ∅ := by
ext f
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, not_forall, iff_false, mem_pi, Classical.not_imp]
exact ⟨i, hs, by simp [ht]⟩
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty (ht : t i = ∅) : pi univ t = ∅ :=
pi_eq_empty (mem_univ i) ht
theorem pi_nonempty_iff : (s.pi t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, ∃ x, i ∈ s → x ∈ t i := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
theorem univ_pi_nonempty_iff : (pi univ t).Nonempty ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty := by
simp [Classical.skolem, Set.Nonempty]
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, IsEmpty (α i) ∨ i ∈ s ∧ t i = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, pi_nonempty_iff]
push_neg
refine exists_congr fun i => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty (α i) <;> simp [*, forall_and, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_eq_empty_iff : pi univ t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, t i = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, univ_pi_nonempty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem univ_pi_empty [h : Nonempty ι] : pi univ (fun _ => ∅ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) = ∅ :=
univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.2 <| h.elim fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_univ_pi : Disjoint (pi univ t₁) (pi univ t₂) ↔ ∃ i, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, univ_pi_eq_empty_iff]
theorem Disjoint.set_pi (hi : i ∈ s) (ht : Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i)) : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h₁ h₂ => disjoint_left.1 ht (h₁ _ hi) (h₂ _ hi)
theorem uniqueElim_preimage [Unique ι] (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
uniqueElim ⁻¹' pi univ t = t (default : ι) := by ext; simp [Unique.forall_iff]
section Nonempty
variable [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
theorem pi_eq_empty_iff' : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by simp [pi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_pi : Disjoint (s.pi t₁) (s.pi t₂) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, Disjoint (t₁ i) (t₂ i) := by
simp only [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← pi_inter_distrib, pi_eq_empty_iff']
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_pi (i : ι) (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
pi (insert i s) t = eval i ⁻¹' t i ∩ pi s t := by
ext
simp [pi, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_pi (i : ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi {i} t = eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
ext
simp [pi]
theorem singleton_pi' (i : ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : pi {i} t = { x | x i ∈ t i } :=
singleton_pi i t
theorem univ_pi_singleton (f : ∀ i, α i) : (pi univ fun i => {f i}) = ({f} : Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
ext fun g => by simp [funext_iff]
theorem preimage_pi (s : Set ι) (t : ∀ i, Set (β i)) (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) :
(fun (g : ∀ i, α i) i => f _ (g i)) ⁻¹' s.pi t = s.pi fun i => f i ⁻¹' t i :=
rfl
theorem pi_if {p : ι → Prop} [h : DecidablePred p] (s : Set ι) (t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Set (α i)) :
(pi s fun i => if p i then t₁ i else t₂ i) =
pi ({ i ∈ s | p i }) t₁ ∩ pi ({ i ∈ s | ¬p i }) t₂ := by
ext f
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· constructor <;>
· rintro i ⟨his, hpi⟩
simpa [*] using h i
· rintro ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩ i his
by_cases p i <;> simp_all
theorem union_pi : (s₁ ∪ s₂).pi t = s₁.pi t ∩ s₂.pi t := by
simp [pi, or_imp, forall_and, setOf_and]
theorem union_pi_inter
(ht₁ : ∀ i ∉ s₁, t₁ i = univ) (ht₂ : ∀ i ∉ s₂, t₂ i = univ) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).pi (fun i ↦ t₁ i ∩ t₂ i) = s₁.pi t₁ ∩ s₂.pi t₂ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_pi, mem_union, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i his₁ ↦ (h i (Or.inl his₁)).1, fun i his₂ ↦ (h i (Or.inr his₂)).2⟩,
fun h i hi ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hi with hi | hi
· by_cases hi2 : i ∈ s₂
· exact ⟨h.1 i hi, h.2 i hi2⟩
· refine ⟨h.1 i hi, ?_⟩
rw [ht₂ i hi2]
exact mem_univ _
· by_cases hi1 : i ∈ s₁
· exact ⟨h.1 i hi1, h.2 i hi⟩
· refine ⟨?_, h.2 i hi⟩
rw [ht₁ i hi1]
exact mem_univ _
@[simp]
theorem pi_inter_compl (s : Set ι) : pi s t ∩ pi sᶜ t = pi univ t := by
rw [← union_pi, union_compl_self]
theorem pi_update_of_not_mem [DecidableEq ι] (hi : i ∉ s) (f : ∀ j, α j) (a : α i)
(t : ∀ j, α j → Set (β j)) : (s.pi fun j => t j (update f i a j)) = s.pi fun j => t j (f j) :=
(pi_congr rfl) fun j hj => by
rw [update_of_ne]
exact fun h => hi (h ▸ hj)
theorem pi_update_of_mem [DecidableEq ι] (hi : i ∈ s) (f : ∀ j, α j) (a : α i)
(t : ∀ j, α j → Set (β j)) :
(s.pi fun j => t j (update f i a j)) = { x | x i ∈ t i a } ∩ (s \ {i}).pi fun j => t j (f j) :=
calc
(s.pi fun j => t j (update f i a j)) = ({i} ∪ s \ {i}).pi fun j => t j (update f i a j) := by
rw [union_diff_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 hi)]
_ = { x | x i ∈ t i a } ∩ (s \ {i}).pi fun j => t j (f j) := by
rw [union_pi, singleton_pi', update_self, pi_update_of_not_mem]; simp
theorem univ_pi_update [DecidableEq ι] {β : ι → Type*} (i : ι) (f : ∀ j, α j) (a : α i)
(t : ∀ j, α j → Set (β j)) :
(pi univ fun j => t j (update f i a j)) = { x | x i ∈ t i a } ∩ pi {i}ᶜ fun j => t j (f j) := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, ← pi_update_of_mem (mem_univ _)]
theorem univ_pi_update_univ [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (s : Set (α i)) :
pi univ (update (fun j : ι => (univ : Set (α j))) i s) = eval i ⁻¹' s := by
rw [univ_pi_update i (fun j => (univ : Set (α j))) s fun j t => t, pi_univ, inter_univ, preimage]
theorem eval_image_pi_subset (hs : i ∈ s) : eval i '' s.pi t ⊆ t i :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hf => hf i hs
theorem eval_image_univ_pi_subset : eval i '' pi univ t ⊆ t i :=
eval_image_pi_subset (mem_univ i)
theorem subset_eval_image_pi (ht : (s.pi t).Nonempty) (i : ι) : t i ⊆ eval i '' s.pi t := by
classical
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := ht
refine fun y hy => ⟨update f i y, fun j hj => ?_, update_self ..⟩
obtain rfl | hji := eq_or_ne j i <;> simp [*, hf _ hj]
theorem eval_image_pi (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : (s.pi t).Nonempty) : eval i '' s.pi t = t i :=
(eval_image_pi_subset hs).antisymm (subset_eval_image_pi ht i)
lemma eval_image_pi_of_not_mem [Decidable (s.pi t).Nonempty] (hi : i ∉ s) :
eval i '' s.pi t = if (s.pi t).Nonempty then univ else ∅ := by
classical
ext xᵢ
simp only [eval, mem_image, mem_pi, Set.Nonempty, mem_ite_empty_right, mem_univ, and_true]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨Function.update x i xᵢ, ?_⟩
| simpa (config := { contextual := true }) [(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem · hi)]
@[simp]
theorem eval_image_univ_pi (ht : (pi univ t).Nonempty) :
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 807 | 810 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
/-!
# Continuity of power functions
This file contains lemmas about continuity of the power functions on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
section CpowLimits
/-!
## Continuity for complex powers
-/
open Complex
variable {α : Type*}
theorem zero_cpow_eq_nhds {b : ℂ} (hb : b ≠ 0) : (fun x : ℂ => (0 : ℂ) ^ x) =ᶠ[𝓝 b] 0 := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 b, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [zero_cpow hx, Pi.zero_apply]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne hb
theorem cpow_eq_nhds {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(fun x => x ^ b) =ᶠ[𝓝 a] fun x => exp (log x * b) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 a, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne ha
theorem cpow_eq_nhds' {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp_fst : p.fst ≠ 0) :
(fun x => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ × ℂ in 𝓝 p, x.1 ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx]
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ hp_fst
change IsOpen { x : ℂ × ℂ | x.1 = 0 }ᶜ
rw [isOpen_compl_iff]
exact isClosed_eq continuous_fst continuous_const
-- Continuity of `fun x => a ^ x`: union of these two lemmas is optimal.
theorem continuousAt_const_cpow {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) b := by
have cpow_eq : (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) = fun x => exp (log a * x) := by
ext1 b
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero ha]
rw [cpow_eq]
exact continuous_exp.continuousAt.comp (ContinuousAt.mul continuousAt_const continuousAt_id)
theorem continuousAt_const_cpow' {a b : ℂ} (h : b ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) b := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, continuousAt_congr (zero_cpow_eq_nhds h)]
exact continuousAt_const
· exact continuousAt_const_cpow ha
/-- The function `z ^ w` is continuous in `(z, w)` provided that `z` does not belong to the interval
`(-∞, 0]` on the real line. See also `Complex.continuousAt_cpow_zero_of_re_pos` for a version that
works for `z = 0` but assumes `0 < re w`. -/
theorem continuousAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp_fst : p.fst ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) p := by
rw [continuousAt_congr (cpow_eq_nhds' <| slitPlane_ne_zero hp_fst)]
refine continuous_exp.continuousAt.comp ?_
exact
ContinuousAt.mul
(ContinuousAt.comp (continuousAt_clog hp_fst) continuous_fst.continuousAt)
continuous_snd.continuousAt
theorem continuousAt_cpow_const {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousAt (· ^ b) a :=
Tendsto.comp (@continuousAt_cpow (a, b) ha) (continuousAt_id.prodMk continuousAt_const)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cpow {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℂ} {a b : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a))
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (ha : a ∈ slitPlane) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x ^ g x) l (𝓝 (a ^ b)) :=
(@continuousAt_cpow (a, b) ha).tendsto.comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.const_cpow {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {a b : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b))
(h : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => a ^ f x) l (𝓝 (a ^ b)) := by
cases h with
| inl h => exact (continuousAt_const_cpow h).tendsto.comp hf
| inr h => exact (continuousAt_const_cpow' h).tendsto.comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℂ} {s : Set α} {a : α}
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.cpow (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) (h0 : f a ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x) s a :=
hf.cpow hg h0
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(h : b ≠ 0 ∨ f a ≠ 0) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => b ^ f x) s a :=
hf.const_cpow h
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.cpow (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (hg : ContinuousAt g a)
(h0 : f a ∈ slitPlane) : ContinuousAt (fun x => f x ^ g x) a :=
hf.cpow hg h0
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => b ^ f x) a :=
hf.const_cpow h
theorem ContinuousOn.cpow (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(h0 : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ slitPlane) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ g x) s := fun a ha =>
(hf a ha).cpow (hg a ha) (h0 a ha)
theorem ContinuousOn.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => b ^ f x) s := fun a ha => (hf a ha).const_cpow (h.imp id fun h => h a ha)
theorem Continuous.cpow (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g)
(h0 : ∀ a, f a ∈ slitPlane) : Continuous fun x => f x ^ g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun a => hf.continuousAt.cpow hg.continuousAt (h0 a)
theorem Continuous.const_cpow {b : ℂ} (hf : Continuous f) (h : b ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ a, f a ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x => b ^ f x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun a => hf.continuousAt.const_cpow <| h.imp id fun h => h a
theorem ContinuousOn.cpow_const {b : ℂ} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(h : ∀ a : α, a ∈ s → f a ∈ slitPlane) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ b) s :=
hf.cpow continuousOn_const h
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_const_cpow (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] : Continuous fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
continuous_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end CpowLimits
section RpowLimits
/-!
## Continuity for real powers
-/
namespace Real
theorem continuousAt_const_rpow {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (a ^ ·) b := by
simp only [rpow_def]
refine Complex.continuous_re.continuousAt.comp ?_
refine (continuousAt_const_cpow ?_).comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
norm_cast
theorem continuousAt_const_rpow' {a b : ℝ} (h : b ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (a ^ ·) b := by
simp only [rpow_def]
refine Complex.continuous_re.continuousAt.comp ?_
refine (continuousAt_const_cpow' ?_).comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
norm_cast
theorem rpow_eq_nhds_of_neg {p : ℝ × ℝ} (hp_fst : p.fst < 0) :
(fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) * cos (x.2 * π) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℝ × ℝ in 𝓝 p, x.1 < 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [rpow_def_of_neg hx]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem (isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_const) hp_fst
theorem rpow_eq_nhds_of_pos {p : ℝ × ℝ} (hp_fst : 0 < p.fst) :
(fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℝ × ℝ in 𝓝 p, 0 < x.1 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem (isOpen_lt continuous_const continuous_fst) hp_fst
theorem continuousAt_rpow_of_ne (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 ^ p.2) p := by
rw [ne_iff_lt_or_gt] at hp
cases hp with
| inl hp =>
| rw [continuousAt_congr (rpow_eq_nhds_of_neg hp)]
refine ContinuousAt.mul ?_ (continuous_cos.continuousAt.comp ?_)
· refine continuous_exp.continuousAt.comp (ContinuousAt.mul ?_ continuous_snd.continuousAt)
refine (continuousAt_log ?_).comp continuous_fst.continuousAt
exact hp.ne
· exact continuous_snd.continuousAt.mul continuousAt_const
| inr hp =>
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Continuity.lean | 184 | 190 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
/-!
# Additional properties of binary recursion on `Nat`
This file documents additional properties of binary recursion,
which allows us to more easily work with operations which do depend
on the number of leading zeros in the binary representation of `n`.
For example, we can more easily work with `Nat.bits` and `Nat.size`.
See also: `Nat.bitwise`, `Nat.pow` (for various lemmas about `size` and `shiftLeft`/`shiftRight`),
and `Nat.digits`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
-- Once we're in the `Nat` namespace, `xor` will inconveniently resolve to `Nat.xor`.
/-- `bxor` denotes the `xor` function i.e. the exclusive-or function on type `Bool`. -/
local notation "bxor" => xor
namespace Nat
universe u
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `boddDiv2 n` returns a 2-tuple of type `(Bool, Nat)` where the `Bool` value indicates whether
`n` is odd or not and the `Nat` value returns `⌊n/2⌋` -/
def boddDiv2 : ℕ → Bool × ℕ
| 0 => (false, 0)
| succ n =>
match boddDiv2 n with
| (false, m) => (true, m)
| (true, m) => (false, succ m)
/-- `div2 n = ⌊n/2⌋` the greatest integer smaller than `n/2` -/
def div2 (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (boddDiv2 n).2
/-- `bodd n` returns `true` if `n` is odd -/
def bodd (n : ℕ) : Bool := (boddDiv2 n).1
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = false := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = true := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = false := rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_succ (n : ℕ) : bodd (succ n) = not (bodd n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2]
let ⟨b,m⟩ := boddDiv2 n
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_add (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) := by
induction n
case zero => simp
case succ n ih => simp [← Nat.add_assoc, Bool.xor_not, ih]
@[simp]
lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m * n) = (bodd m && bodd n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [mul_succ, bodd_add, IH, bodd_succ]
cases bodd m <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma mod_two_of_bodd (n : ℕ) : n % 2 = (bodd n).toNat := by
have := congr_arg bodd (mod_add_div n 2)
simp? [not] at this says
simp only [bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, not, bodd_zero, Bool.false_and, Bool.bne_false]
at this
have _ : ∀ b, and false b = false := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
have _ : ∀ b, bxor b false = b := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
rw [← this]
rcases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h | h <;> rw [h] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_zero : div2 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_one : div2 1 = 0 := rfl
lemma div2_two : div2 2 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma div2_succ (n : ℕ) : div2 (n + 1) = cond (bodd n) (succ (div2 n)) (div2 n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2, div2]
rcases boddDiv2 n with ⟨_|_, _⟩ <;> simp
attribute [local simp] Nat.add_comm Nat.add_assoc Nat.add_left_comm Nat.mul_comm Nat.mul_assoc
lemma bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, (bodd n).toNat + 2 * div2 n = n
| 0 => rfl
| succ n => by
simp only [bodd_succ, Bool.cond_not, div2_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (congr_arg succ (bodd_add_div2 n))
cases bodd n
· simp
· simp; omega
lemma div2_val (n) : div2 n = n / 2 := by
refine Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by decide)
(Nat.add_left_cancel (Eq.trans ?_ (Nat.mod_add_div n 2).symm))
rw [mod_two_of_bodd, bodd_add_div2]
lemma bit_decomp (n : Nat) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans <| (Nat.add_comm _ _).trans <| bodd_add_div2 _
lemma bit_zero : bit false 0 = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `shiftLeft' b m n` performs a left shift of `m` `n` times
and adds the bit `b` as the least significant bit each time.
Returns the corresponding natural number -/
def shiftLeft' (b : Bool) (m : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => m
| n + 1 => bit b (shiftLeft' b m n)
@[simp]
lemma shiftLeft'_false : ∀ n, shiftLeft' false m n = m <<< n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
have : 2 * (m * 2^n) = 2^(n+1)*m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_assoc, ← Nat.pow_succ]; simp
simp [shiftLeft_eq, shiftLeft', bit_val, shiftLeft'_false, this]
/-- Lean takes the unprimed name for `Nat.shiftLeft_eq m n : m <<< n = m * 2 ^ n`. -/
@[simp] lemma shiftLeft_eq' (m n : Nat) : shiftLeft m n = m <<< n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftRight_eq (m n : Nat) : shiftRight m n = m >>> n := rfl
lemma binaryRec_decreasing (h : n ≠ 0) : div2 n < n := by
rw [div2_val]
apply (div_lt_iff_lt_mul <| succ_pos 1).2
have := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self 1)
(lt_of_le_of_ne n.zero_le h.symm)
rwa [Nat.mul_one] at this
/-- `size n` : Returns the size of a natural number in
bits i.e. the length of its binary representation -/
def size : ℕ → ℕ :=
binaryRec 0 fun _ _ => succ
/-- `bits n` returns a list of Bools which correspond to the binary representation of n, where
the head of the list represents the least significant bit -/
def bits : ℕ → List Bool :=
binaryRec [] fun b _ IH => b :: IH
/-- `ldiff a b` performs bitwise set difference. For each corresponding
pair of bits taken as booleans, say `aᵢ` and `bᵢ`, it applies the
boolean operation `aᵢ ∧ ¬bᵢ` to obtain the `iᵗʰ` bit of the result. -/
def ldiff : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ :=
bitwise fun a b => a && not b
/-! bitwise ops -/
lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b := by
rw [bit_val]
simp only [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_comm, bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, bodd_zero, Bool.not_false,
Bool.not_true, Bool.and_false, Bool.xor_false]
cases b <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n := by
rw [bit_val, div2_val, Nat.add_comm, add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt, Nat.zero_add]
<;> cases b
<;> decide
lemma shiftLeft'_add (b m n) : ∀ k, shiftLeft' b m (n + k) = shiftLeft' b (shiftLeft' b m n) k
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => congr_arg (bit b) (shiftLeft'_add b m n k)
lemma shiftLeft'_sub (b m) : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → shiftLeft' b m (n - k) = (shiftLeft' b m n) >>> k
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, k + 1, h => by
rw [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, shiftLeft', Nat.add_comm, shiftRight_add]
simp only [shiftLeft'_sub, Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h, shiftRight_succ, shiftRight_zero]
simp [← div2_val, div2_bit]
lemma shiftLeft_sub : ∀ (m : Nat) {n k}, k ≤ n → m <<< (n - k) = (m <<< n) >>> k :=
fun _ _ _ hk => by simp only [← shiftLeft'_false, shiftLeft'_sub false _ hk]
lemma bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero : ∀ n, bodd n = (1 &&& n != 0)
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| n + 2 => by simpa using bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero n
lemma testBit_bit_succ (m b n) : testBit (bit b n) (succ m) = testBit n m := by
have : bodd (((bit b n) >>> 1) >>> m) = bodd (n >>> m) := by
simp only [shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
simp [← div2_val, div2_bit]
rw [← shiftRight_add, Nat.add_comm] at this
simp only [bodd_eq_one_and_ne_zero] at this
exact this
/-! ### `boddDiv2_eq` and `bodd` -/
@[simp]
theorem boddDiv2_eq (n : ℕ) : boddDiv2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (2 * n) = n :=
div2_bit false n
-- simp can prove this
theorem div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (2 * n + 1) = n :=
div2_bit true n
/-! ### `bit0` and `bit1` -/
theorem bit_add : ∀ (b : Bool) (n m : ℕ), bit b (n + m) = bit false n + bit b m
| true, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
theorem bit_add' : ∀ (b : Bool) (n m : ℕ), bit b (n + m) = bit b n + bit false m
| true, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _ => by dsimp [bit]; omega
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 := by
cases b <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
@[simp]
theorem bitCasesOn_bit0 {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) :
bitCasesOn (2 * n) H = H false n :=
bitCasesOn_bit H false n
@[simp]
theorem bitCasesOn_bit1 {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) :
bitCasesOn (2 * n + 1) H = H true n :=
bitCasesOn_bit H true n
theorem bit_cases_on_injective {motive : ℕ → Sort u} :
Function.Injective fun H : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n) => fun n => bitCasesOn n H := by
intro H₁ H₂ h
ext b n
simpa only [bitCasesOn_bit] using congr_fun h (bit b n)
@[simp]
theorem bit_cases_on_inj {motive : ℕ → Sort u} (H₁ H₂ : ∀ b n, motive (bit b n)) :
((fun n => bitCasesOn n H₁) = fun n => bitCasesOn n H₂) ↔ H₁ = H₂ :=
bit_cases_on_injective.eq_iff
lemma bit_le : ∀ (b : Bool) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit b n
| true, _, _, h => by dsimp [bit]; omega
| false, _, _, h => by dsimp [bit]; omega
lemma bit_lt_bit (a b) (h : m < n) : bit a m < bit b n := calc
bit a m < 2 * n := by cases a <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
_ ≤ bit b n := by cases b <;> dsimp [bit] <;> omega
@[simp]
theorem zero_bits : bits 0 = [] := by simp [Nat.bits]
@[simp]
theorem bits_append_bit (n : ℕ) (b : Bool) (hn : n = 0 → b = true) :
(bit b n).bits = b :: n.bits := by
rw [Nat.bits, Nat.bits, binaryRec_eq]
simpa
@[simp]
theorem bit0_bits (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (2 * n).bits = false :: n.bits :=
bits_append_bit n false fun hn' => absurd hn' hn
@[simp]
theorem bit1_bits (n : ℕ) : (2 * n + 1).bits = true :: n.bits :=
bits_append_bit n true fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_bits : Nat.bits 1 = [true] := by
convert bit1_bits 0
simp
-- TODO Find somewhere this can live.
-- example : bits 3423 = [true, true, true, true, true, false, true, false, true, false, true, true]
-- := by norm_num
theorem bodd_eq_bits_head (n : ℕ) : n.bodd = n.bits.headI := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec' with
| z => simp
| f _ _ h _ => simp [bodd_bit, bits_append_bit _ _ h]
theorem div2_bits_eq_tail (n : ℕ) : n.div2.bits = n.bits.tail := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec' with
| z => simp
| f _ _ h _ => simp [div2_bit, bits_append_bit _ _ h]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bits.lean | 389 | 390 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
filter_subset _ _
theorem norm_of_mem_sphere {x : Fin n → ℕ} (hx : x ∈ sphere n d k) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)‖ = √↑k := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq]
dsimp
simp_rw [abs_cast, ← cast_pow, ← cast_sum, (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
theorem sphere_subset_preimage_metric_sphere : (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) ⊆
(fun x : Fin n → ℕ => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)) ⁻¹'
Metric.sphere (0 : PiLp 2 fun _ : Fin n => ℝ) (√↑k) :=
fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_of_mem_sphere hx]
/-- The map that appears in Behrend's bound on Roth numbers. -/
@[simps]
def map (d : ℕ) : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ ℕ where
toFun a := ∑ i, a i * d ^ (i : ℕ)
map_zero' := by simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero]
map_add' a b := by simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, add_mul, sum_add_distrib]
theorem map_zero (d : ℕ) (a : Fin 0 → ℕ) : map d a = 0 := by simp [map]
theorem map_succ (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) :
map d a = a 0 + (∑ x : Fin n, a x.succ * d ^ (x : ℕ)) * d := by
simp [map, Fin.sum_univ_succ, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← sum_mul]
theorem map_succ' (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) : map d a = a 0 + map d (a ∘ Fin.succ) * d :=
map_succ _
theorem map_monotone (d : ℕ) : Monotone (map d : (Fin n → ℕ) → ℕ) := fun x y h => by
dsimp; exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ <| h i
theorem map_mod (a : Fin n.succ → ℕ) : map d a % d = a 0 % d := by
rw [map_succ, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right]
theorem map_eq_iff {x₁ x₂ : Fin n.succ → ℕ} (hx₁ : ∀ i, x₁ i < d) (hx₂ : ∀ i, x₂ i < d) :
map d x₁ = map d x₂ ↔ x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 ∧ map d (x₁ ∘ Fin.succ) = map d (x₂ ∘ Fin.succ) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [map_succ', map_succ', h.1, h.2]⟩
have : x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 := by
rw [← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₁ _), ← map_mod, ← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₂ _), ← map_mod, h]
rw [map_succ, map_succ, this, add_right_inj, mul_eq_mul_right_iff] at h
exact ⟨this, h.resolve_right (pos_of_gt (hx₁ 0)).ne'⟩
theorem map_injOn : {x : Fin n → ℕ | ∀ i, x i < d}.InjOn (map d) := by
intro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ h
induction n with
| zero => simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| succ n ih =>
ext i
have x := (map_eq_iff hx₁ hx₂).1 h
exact Fin.cases x.1 (congr_fun <| ih (fun _ => hx₁ _) (fun _ => hx₂ _) x.2) i
theorem map_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) :
map (2 * d - 1) x ≤ ∑ i : Fin n, (d - 1) * (2 * d - 1) ^ (i : ℕ) :=
map_monotone (2 * d - 1) fun _ => Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_box.1 hx _
nonrec theorem threeAPFree_sphere : ThreeAPFree (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) := by
set f : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) :=
{ toFun := fun f => ((↑) : ℕ → ℝ) ∘ f
map_zero' := funext fun _ => cast_zero
map_add' := fun _ _ => funext fun _ => cast_add _ _ }
refine ThreeAPFree.of_image (AddMonoidHomClass.isAddFreimanHom f (Set.mapsTo_image _ _))
cast_injective.comp_left.injOn (Set.subset_univ _) ?_
refine (threeAPFree_sphere 0 (√↑k)).mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun x => ?_)
rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm]
exact norm_of_mem_sphere
theorem threeAPFree_image_sphere :
ThreeAPFree ((sphere n d k).image (map (2 * d - 1)) : Set ℕ) := by
rw [coe_image]
apply ThreeAPFree.image' (α := Fin n → ℕ) (β := ℕ) (s := sphere n d k) (map (2 * d - 1))
(map_injOn.mono _) threeAPFree_sphere
rw [Set.add_subset_iff]
rintro a ha b hb i
have hai := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box ha) i
have hbi := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box hb) i
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, ← succ_le_iff, two_mul]
exact (add_add_add_comm _ _ 1 1).trans_le (_root_.add_le_add hai hbi)
theorem sum_sq_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) : ∑ i : Fin n, x i ^ 2 ≤ n * (d - 1) ^ 2 := by
rw [mem_box] at hx
have : ∀ i, x i ^ 2 ≤ (d - 1) ^ 2 := fun i =>
Nat.pow_le_pow_left (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (hx i)) _
exact (sum_le_card_nsmul univ _ _ fun i _ => this i).trans (by rw [card_fin, smul_eq_mul])
theorem sum_eq : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) = ((2 * d + 1) ^ n - 1) / 2 := by
refine (Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left zero_lt_two ?_).symm
rw [← sum_range fun i => d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ), ← mul_sum, mul_right_comm, mul_comm d, ←
geom_sum_mul_add, add_tsub_cancel_right, mul_comm]
theorem sum_lt : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) < (2 * d + 1) ^ n :=
sum_eq.trans_lt <| (Nat.div_le_self _ 2).trans_lt <| pred_lt (pow_pos (succ_pos _) _).ne'
theorem card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat (n d k : ℕ) :
#(sphere n d k) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) := by
cases n
· dsimp; refine (card_le_univ _).trans_eq ?_; rfl
cases d
· simp
apply threeAPFree_image_sphere.le_rothNumberNat _ _ (card_image_of_injOn _)
· simp only [subset_iff, mem_image, and_imp, forall_exists_index, mem_range,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, sphere, mem_filter]
rintro _ x hx _ rfl
exact (map_le_of_mem_box hx).trans_lt sum_lt
apply map_injOn.mono fun x => ?_
simp only [mem_coe, sphere, mem_filter, mem_box, and_imp, two_mul]
exact fun h _ i => (h i).trans_le le_self_add
/-!
### Optimization
Now that we know how to turn the integer points of any sphere into a 3AP-free set, we find a
| sphere containing many integer points by the pigeonhole principle. This gives us an implicit bound
that we then optimize by tweaking the parameters. The (almost) optimal parameters are
`Behrend.nValue` and `Behrend.dValue`.
-/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 226 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Bitwise operations on natural numbers
In the first half of this file, we provide theorems for reasoning about natural numbers from their
bitwise properties. In the second half of this file, we show properties of the bitwise operations
`lor`, `land` and `xor`, which are defined in core.
## Main results
* `eq_of_testBit_eq`: two natural numbers are equal if they have equal bits at every position.
* `exists_most_significant_bit`: if `n ≠ 0`, then there is some position `i` that contains the most
significant `1`-bit of `n`.
* `lt_of_testBit`: if `n` and `m` are numbers and `i` is a position such that the `i`-th bit of
of `n` is zero, the `i`-th bit of `m` is one, and all more significant bits are equal, then
`n < m`.
## Future work
There is another way to express bitwise properties of natural number: `digits 2`. The two ways
should be connected.
## Keywords
bitwise, and, or, xor
-/
open Function
namespace Nat
section
variable {f : Bool → Bool → Bool}
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_left (m : Nat) : bitwise f 0 m = if f false true then m else 0 := by
simp [bitwise]
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_zero_right (n : Nat) : bitwise f n 0 = if f true false then n else 0 := by
unfold bitwise
simp only [ite_self, decide_false, Nat.zero_div, ite_true, ite_eq_right_iff]
rintro ⟨⟩
split_ifs <;> rfl
lemma bitwise_zero : bitwise f 0 0 = 0 := by
simp only [bitwise_zero_right, ite_self]
lemma bitwise_of_ne_zero {n m : Nat} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
bitwise f n m = bit (f (bodd n) (bodd m)) (bitwise f (n / 2) (m / 2)) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
have mod_two_iff_bod x : (x % 2 = 1 : Bool) = bodd x := by
simp only [mod_two_of_bodd, cond]; cases bodd x <;> rfl
simp only [hn, hm, mod_two_iff_bod, ite_false, bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
theorem binaryRec_of_ne_zero {C : Nat → Sort*} (z : C 0) (f : ∀ b n, C n → C (bit b n)) {n}
(h : n ≠ 0) :
binaryRec z f n = bit_decomp n ▸ f (bodd n) (div2 n) (binaryRec z f (div2 n)) := by
cases n using bitCasesOn with
| h b n =>
rw [binaryRec_eq _ _ (by right; simpa [bit_eq_zero_iff] using h)]
generalize_proofs h; revert h
rw [bodd_bit, div2_bit]
simp
@[simp]
lemma bitwise_bit {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (h : f false false = false := by rfl) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
simp only [bit, ite_apply, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
have h4 x : (x + x + 1) / 2 = x := by rw [← two_mul, add_comm]; simp [add_mul_div_left]
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [h4] <;> split_ifs
<;> simp_all +decide [two_mul]
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_zero_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 0 ↔ !a := by
simp
lemma bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff (a x) :
bit a x % 2 = 1 ↔ a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem lor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ||| bit b n = bit (a || b) (m ||| n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem land_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m &&& bit b n = bit (a && b) (m &&& n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem ldiff_bit : ∀ a m b n, ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && not b) (ldiff m n) :=
bitwise_bit
@[simp]
theorem xor_bit : ∀ a m b n, bit a m ^^^ bit b n = bit (bne a b) (m ^^^ n) :=
bitwise_bit
attribute [simp] Nat.testBit_bitwise
theorem testBit_lor : ∀ m n k, testBit (m ||| n) k = (testBit m k || testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
theorem testBit_land : ∀ m n k, testBit (m &&& n) k = (testBit m k && testBit n k) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
@[simp]
theorem testBit_ldiff : ∀ m n k, testBit (ldiff m n) k = (testBit m k && not (testBit n k)) :=
testBit_bitwise rfl
attribute [simp] testBit_xor
end
@[simp]
theorem bit_false : bit false = (2 * ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bit_true : bit true = (2 * · + 1) :=
rfl
theorem bit_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} {b : Bool} : n.bit b ≠ 0 ↔ n = 0 → b = true := by
simp
/-- An alternative for `bitwise_bit` which replaces the `f false false = false` assumption
with assumptions that neither `bit a m` nor `bit b n` are `0`
(albeit, phrased as the implications `m = 0 → a = true` and `n = 0 → b = true`) -/
lemma bitwise_bit' {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (a : Bool) (m : Nat) (b : Bool) (n : Nat)
(ham : m = 0 → a = true) (hbn : n = 0 → b = true) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bitwise
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at ham hbn
simp only [ham, hbn, bit_mod_two_eq_one_iff, Bool.decide_coe, ← div2_val, div2_bit, ne_eq,
ite_false]
conv_rhs => simp only [bit, two_mul, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
lemma bitwise_eq_binaryRec (f : Bool → Bool → Bool) :
bitwise f =
binaryRec (fun n => cond (f false true) n 0) fun a m Ia =>
binaryRec (cond (f true false) (bit a m) 0) fun b n _ => bit (f a b) (Ia n) := by
funext x y
induction x using binaryRec' generalizing y with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_left, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f xb x hxb ih =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hxb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hxb, bodd_bit, div2_bit, eq_rec_constant]
induction y using binaryRec' with
| z => simp only [bitwise_zero_right, binaryRec_zero, Bool.cond_eq_ite]
| f yb y hyb =>
rw [← bit_ne_zero_iff] at hyb
simp_rw [binaryRec_of_ne_zero _ _ hyb, bitwise_of_ne_zero hxb hyb, bodd_bit, ← div2_val,
div2_bit, eq_rec_constant, ih]
theorem zero_of_testBit_eq_false {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ i, testBit n i = false) : n = 0 := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => rfl | f b n hn => ?_
have : b = false := by simpa using h 0
rw [this, bit_false, hn fun i => by rw [← h (i + 1), testBit_bit_succ]]
theorem testBit_eq_false_of_lt {n i} (h : n < 2 ^ i) : n.testBit i = false := by
simp [testBit, shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Nat.div_eq_of_lt h]
/-- The ith bit is the ith element of `n.bits`. -/
theorem testBit_eq_inth (n i : ℕ) : n.testBit i = n.bits.getI i := by
induction i generalizing n with
| zero =>
simp only [testBit, zero_eq, shiftRight_zero, one_and_eq_mod_two, mod_two_of_bodd,
bodd_eq_bits_head, List.getI_zero_eq_headI]
cases List.headI (bits n) <;> rfl
| succ i ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [← bit_decomp n]
rw [testBit_bit_succ, ih n.div2, div2_bits_eq_tail]
cases n.bits <;> simp
theorem exists_most_significant_bit {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
∃ i, testBit n i = true ∧ ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = false := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec with | z => exact False.elim (h rfl) | f b n hn => ?_
by_cases h' : n = 0
· subst h'
rw [show b = true by
revert h
cases b <;> simp]
refine ⟨0, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_zero], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hj)
rw [testBit_bit_succ, zero_testBit]
· obtain ⟨k, ⟨hk, hk'⟩⟩ := hn h'
refine ⟨k + 1, ⟨by rw [testBit_bit_succ, hk], fun j hj => ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (show j ≠ 0 by intro x; subst x; simp at hj)
exact (testBit_bit_succ _ _ _).trans (hk' _ (lt_of_succ_lt_succ hj))
theorem lt_of_testBit {n m : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hn : testBit n i = false) (hm : testBit m i = true)
(hnm : ∀ j, i < j → testBit n j = testBit m j) : n < m := by
induction n using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i m with
| z =>
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rintro rfl
simp at hm
| f b n hn' =>
induction m using Nat.binaryRec generalizing i with
| z => exact False.elim (Bool.false_ne_true ((zero_testBit i).symm.trans hm))
| f b' m hm' =>
by_cases hi : i = 0
· subst hi
simp only [testBit_bit_zero] at hn hm
have : n = m :=
eq_of_testBit_eq fun i => by convert hnm (i + 1) (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) using 1
<;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
rw [hn, hm, this, bit_false, bit_true]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
· obtain ⟨i', rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hi
simp only [testBit_bit_succ] at hn hm
have := hn' _ hn hm fun j hj => by
convert hnm j.succ (succ_lt_succ hj) using 1 <;> rw [testBit_bit_succ]
have this' : 2 * n < 2 * m := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) this Nat.two_pos
cases b <;> cases b'
<;> simp only [bit_false, bit_true]
· exact this'
· exact Nat.lt_add_right 1 this'
· calc
2 * n + 1 < 2 * n + 2 := lt.base _
_ ≤ 2 * m := mul_le_mul_left 2 this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ this'
theorem bitwise_swap {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} :
bitwise (Function.swap f) = Function.swap (bitwise f) := by
funext m n
simp only [Function.swap]
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn generalizing n with | ind m ih => ?_
rcases m with - | m
<;> rcases n with - | n
<;> try rw [bitwise_zero_left, bitwise_zero_right]
· specialize ih ((m+1) / 2) (div_lt_self' ..)
simp [bitwise_of_ne_zero, ih]
/-- If `f` is a commutative operation on bools such that `f false false = false`, then `bitwise f`
is also commutative. -/
theorem bitwise_comm {f : Bool → Bool → Bool} (hf : ∀ b b', f b b' = f b' b) (n m : ℕ) :
bitwise f n m = bitwise f m n :=
suffices bitwise f = swap (bitwise f) by conv_lhs => rw [this]
calc
bitwise f = bitwise (swap f) := congr_arg _ <| funext fun _ => funext <| hf _
_ = swap (bitwise f) := bitwise_swap
theorem lor_comm (n m : ℕ) : n ||| m = m ||| n :=
bitwise_comm Bool.or_comm n m
theorem land_comm (n m : ℕ) : n &&& m = m &&& n :=
bitwise_comm Bool.and_comm n m
lemma and_two_pow (n i : ℕ) : n &&& 2 ^ i = (n.testBit i).toNat * 2 ^ i := by
refine eq_of_testBit_eq fun j => ?_
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j <;> cases h : n.testBit i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
· simp [h, testBit_two_pow_of_ne hij]
· simp [h, testBit_two_pow_of_ne hij]
lemma two_pow_and (n i : ℕ) : 2 ^ i &&& n = 2 ^ i * (n.testBit i).toNat := by
rw [mul_comm, land_comm, and_two_pow]
/-- Proving associativity of bitwise operations in general essentially boils down to a huge case
distinction, so it is shorter to use this tactic instead of proving it in the general case. -/
macro "bitwise_assoc_tac" : tactic => set_option hygiene false in `(tactic| (
induction n using Nat.binaryRec generalizing m k with | z => simp | f b n hn => ?_
induction m using Nat.binaryRec with | z => simp | f b' m hm => ?_
induction k using Nat.binaryRec <;>
simp [hn, Bool.or_assoc, Bool.and_assoc, Bool.bne_eq_xor]))
theorem land_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n &&& m) &&& k = n &&& (m &&& k) := by bitwise_assoc_tac
theorem lor_assoc (n m k : ℕ) : (n ||| m) ||| k = n ||| (m ||| k) := by bitwise_assoc_tac
-- These lemmas match `mul_inv_cancel_right` and `mul_inv_cancel_left`.
theorem xor_cancel_right (n m : ℕ) : (m ^^^ n) ^^^ n = m := by
rw [Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_self, xor_zero]
theorem xor_cancel_left (n m : ℕ) : n ^^^ (n ^^^ m) = m := by
rw [← Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_self, zero_xor]
theorem xor_right_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective (HXor.hXor n : ℕ → ℕ) := fun m m' h => by
rw [← xor_cancel_left n m, ← xor_cancel_left n m', h]
theorem xor_left_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective fun m => m ^^^ n :=
fun m m' (h : m ^^^ n = m' ^^^ n) => by
rw [← xor_cancel_right n m, ← xor_cancel_right n m', h]
@[simp]
theorem xor_right_inj {n m m' : ℕ} : n ^^^ m = n ^^^ m' ↔ m = m' :=
xor_right_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem xor_left_inj {n m m' : ℕ} : m ^^^ n = m' ^^^ n ↔ m = m' :=
xor_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem xor_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} : n ^^^ m = 0 ↔ n = m := by
rw [← Nat.xor_self n, xor_right_inj, eq_comm]
theorem xor_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} : n ^^^ m ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ m :=
xor_eq_zero.not
theorem xor_trichotomy {a b c : ℕ} (h : a ^^^ b ^^^ c ≠ 0) :
b ^^^ c < a ∨ c ^^^ a < b ∨ a ^^^ b < c := by
set v := a ^^^ b ^^^ c with hv
-- The xor of any two of `a`, `b`, `c` is the xor of `v` and the third.
have hab : a ^^^ b = c ^^^ v := by
rw [Nat.xor_comm c, xor_cancel_right]
have hbc : b ^^^ c = a ^^^ v := by
rw [← Nat.xor_assoc, xor_cancel_left]
have hca : c ^^^ a = b ^^^ v := by
rw [hv, Nat.xor_assoc, Nat.xor_comm a, ← Nat.xor_assoc, xor_cancel_left]
-- If `i` is the position of the most significant bit of `v`, then at least one of `a`, `b`, `c`
-- has a one bit at position `i`.
obtain ⟨i, ⟨hi, hi'⟩⟩ := exists_most_significant_bit h
have : testBit a i ∨ testBit b i ∨ testBit c i := by
contrapose! hi
simp_rw [Bool.eq_false_eq_not_eq_true] at hi ⊢
rw [testBit_xor, testBit_xor, hi.1, hi.2.1, hi.2.2]
rfl
-- If, say, `a` has a one bit at position `i`, then `a xor v` has a zero bit at position `i`, but
-- the same bits as `a` in positions greater than `j`, so `a xor v < a`.
obtain h | h | h := this
on_goal 1 => left; rw [hbc]
on_goal 2 => right; left; rw [hca]
on_goal 3 => right; right; rw [hab]
all_goals
refine lt_of_testBit i ?_ h fun j hj => ?_
· rw [testBit_xor, h, hi]
rfl
· simp only [testBit_xor, hi' _ hj, Bool.bne_false]
theorem lt_xor_cases {a b c : ℕ} (h : a < b ^^^ c) : a ^^^ c < b ∨ a ^^^ b < c := by
obtain ha | hb | hc := xor_trichotomy <| Nat.xor_assoc _ _ _ ▸ xor_ne_zero.2 h.ne
exacts [(h.asymm ha).elim, Or.inl <| Nat.xor_comm _ _ ▸ hb, Or.inr hc]
@[simp]
theorem xor_mod_two_eq {m n : ℕ} : (m ^^^ n) % 2 = (m + n) % 2 := by
by_cases h : (m + n) % 2 = 0
· simp only [h, mod_two_eq_zero_iff_testBit_zero, testBit_zero, xor_mod_two_eq_one, decide_not,
Bool.decide_iff_dist, Bool.not_eq_false', beq_iff_eq, decide_eq_decide]
omega
· simp only [mod_two_ne_zero] at h
simp only [h, xor_mod_two_eq_one]
omega
@[simp]
theorem even_xor {m n : ℕ} : Even (m ^^^ n) ↔ (Even m ↔ Even n) := by
simp only [even_iff, xor_mod_two_eq]
omega
@[simp] theorem bit_lt_two_pow_succ_iff {b x n} : bit b x < 2 ^ (n + 1) ↔ x < 2 ^ n := by
cases b <;> simp <;> omega
@[deprecated bitwise_lt_two_pow (since := "2024-12-28")]
alias bitwise_lt := bitwise_lt_two_pow
lemma shiftLeft_lt {x n m : ℕ} (h : x < 2 ^ n) : x <<< m < 2 ^ (n + m) := by
simp only [Nat.pow_add, shiftLeft_eq, Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.two_pow_pos _), h]
/-- Note that the LHS is the expression used within `Std.BitVec.append`, hence the name. -/
lemma append_lt {x y n m} (hx : x < 2 ^ n) (hy : y < 2 ^ m) : y <<< n ||| x < 2 ^ (n + m) := by
apply bitwise_lt_two_pow
· rw [add_comm]; apply shiftLeft_lt hy
· apply lt_of_lt_of_le hx <| Nat.pow_le_pow_right (le_succ _) (le_add_right _ _)
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean | 403 | 405 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Dimension of modules and vector spaces
## Main definitions
* The rank of a module is defined as `Module.rank : Cardinal`.
This is defined as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
## Main statements
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_injective`: the source of an injective linear map has dimension
at most that of the target.
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_surjective`: the target of a surjective linear map has dimension
at most that of that source.
## Implementation notes
Many theorems in this file are not universe-generic when they relate dimensions
in different universes. They should be as general as they can be without
inserting `lift`s. The types `M`, `M'`, ... all live in different universes,
and `M₁`, `M₂`, ... all live in the same universe.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' u u' v v'
variable {R : Type u} {R' : Type u'} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
open Cardinal Submodule Function Set
section Module
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (R M)
/-- The rank of a module, defined as a term of type `Cardinal`.
We define this as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
The supremum may not be attained, see https://mathoverflow.net/a/263053.
For a free module over any ring satisfying the strong rank condition
(e.g. left-noetherian rings, commutative rings, and in particular division rings and fields),
this is the same as the dimension of the space (i.e. the cardinality of any basis).
In particular this agrees with the usual notion of the dimension of a vector space.
See also `Module.finrank` for a `ℕ`-valued function which returns the correct value
for a finite-dimensional vector space (but 0 for an infinite-dimensional vector space).
-/
@[stacks 09G3 "first part"]
protected irreducible_def Module.rank : Cardinal :=
⨆ ι : { s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s }, (#ι.1)
theorem rank_le_card : Module.rank R M ≤ #M :=
(Module.rank_def _ _).trans_le (ciSup_le' fun _ ↦ mk_set_le _)
lemma nonempty_linearIndependent_set : Nonempty {s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s } :=
⟨⟨∅, linearIndepOn_empty _ _⟩⟩
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Nontrivial R]
theorem cardinal_lift_le_rank {ι : Type w} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [Module.rank]
refine le_trans ?_ (lift_le.mpr <| le_ciSup (bddAbove_range _) ⟨_, hv.linearIndepOn_id⟩)
exact lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective _ hv.injective).toEmbedding⟩
lemma aleph0_le_rank {ι : Type w} [Infinite ι] {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : ℵ₀ ≤ Module.rank R M :=
aleph0_le_lift.mp <| (aleph0_le_lift.mpr <| aleph0_le_mk ι).trans hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank {ι : Type v} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι ≤ Module.rank R M := by
simpa using hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank' {s : Set M}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M)) : #s ≤ Module.rank R M :=
hs.cardinal_le_rank
theorem _root_.LinearIndepOn.encard_le_toENat_rank {ι : Type*} {v : ι → M} {s : Set ι}
(hs : LinearIndepOn R v s) : s.encard ≤ (Module.rank R M).toENat := by
simpa using OrderHom.mono (β := ℕ∞) Cardinal.toENat hs.linearIndependent.cardinal_lift_le_rank
end LinearIndependent
section SurjectiveInjective
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Semiring R']
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R' → R` is an injective map
non-zero elements, `j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar
multiplications on `M` and `M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to
the rank of `M' / R'`. As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is
`LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ (i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M')
(hi : Injective i) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
simp_rw [Module.rank, lift_iSup (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range _) fun ⟨s, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨j '' s,
LinearIndepOn.id_image (h.linearIndependent.map_of_injective_injectiveₛ i j hi hj hc)⟩,
lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.image j s hj).toEmbedding⟩⟩
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a surjective map, and
`j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar multiplications on `M` and
`M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to the rank of `M' / R'`.
As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is `LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_surjective_injective (i : R → R') (j : M →+ M')
(hi : Surjective i) (hj : Injective j) (hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'⟩ := hi.hasRightInverse
refine lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ i' j (fun _ _ h ↦ ?_) hj fun r m ↦ ?_
· apply_fun i at h
rwa [hi', hi'] at h
rw [hc (i' r) m, hi']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a bijective map which maps zero to zero,
`j : M ≃+ M'` is a group isomorphism, such that the scalar multiplications on `M` and `M'` are
compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is equal to the rank of `M' / R'`.
As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is `LinearEquiv.lift_rank_eq`. -/
theorem lift_rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv (i : R → R') (j : M ≃+ M')
(hi : Bijective i) (hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') :=
(lift_rank_le_of_surjective_injective i j hi.2 j.injective hc).antisymm <|
lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ i j.symm hi.1
j.symm.injective fun _ _ ↦ j.symm_apply_eq.2 <| by erw [hc, j.apply_symm_apply]
end
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R' M₁]
/-- The same-universe version of `lift_rank_le_of_injective_injective`. -/
theorem rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ (i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M₁)
(hi : Injective i) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
Module.rank R M ≤ Module.rank R' M₁ := by
simpa only [lift_id] using lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ i j hi hj hc
/-- The same-universe version of `lift_rank_le_of_surjective_injective`. -/
theorem rank_le_of_surjective_injective (i : R → R') (j : M →+ M₁)
(hi : Surjective i) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) :
Module.rank R M ≤ Module.rank R' M₁ := by
simpa only [lift_id] using lift_rank_le_of_surjective_injective i j hi hj hc
/-- The same-universe version of `lift_rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv`. -/
theorem rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv (i : R → R') (j : M ≃+ M₁)
(hi : Bijective i) (hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) :
Module.rank R M = Module.rank R' M₁ := by
simpa only [lift_id] using lift_rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv i j hi hc
end
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Ring R']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R' → R` is a map which sends non-zero elements to
non-zero elements, `j : M →+ M'` is an injective group homomorphism, such that the scalar
multiplications on `M` and `M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to
the rank of `M' / R'`. As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is
`LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_injective_injective [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R' M']
(i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M') (hi : ∀ r, i r = 0 → r = 0) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
simp_rw [Module.rank, lift_iSup (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range _) fun ⟨s, h⟩ ↦
⟨⟨j '' s, LinearIndepOn.id_image <| h.linearIndependent.map_of_injective_injective i j hi
(fun _ _ ↦ hj <| by rwa [j.map_zero]) hc⟩,
lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.image j s hj).toEmbedding⟩⟩
/-- The same-universe version of `lift_rank_le_of_injective_injective`. -/
theorem rank_le_of_injective_injective [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R' M₁]
| (i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M₁) (hi : ∀ r, i r = 0 → r = 0) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
Module.rank R M ≤ Module.rank R' M₁ := by
simpa only [lift_id] using lift_rank_le_of_injective_injective i j hi hj hc
end Ring
namespace Algebra
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Basic.lean | 198 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Chenyi Li. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chenyi Li, Ziyu Wang, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
/-!
# Uniformly and strongly convex functions
In this file, we define uniformly convex functions and strongly convex functions.
For a real normed space `E`, a uniformly convex function with modulus `φ : ℝ → ℝ` is a function
`f : E → ℝ` such that `f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖`
for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
A `m`-strongly convex function is a uniformly convex function with modulus `fun r ↦ m / 2 * r ^ 2`.
If `E` is an inner product space, this is equivalent to `x ↦ f x - m / 2 * ‖x‖ ^ 2` being convex.
## TODO
Prove derivative properties of strongly convex functions.
-/
open Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
section NormedSpace
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {φ ψ : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set E} {m : ℝ} {f g : E → ℝ}
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly convex with modulus `φ` if
`f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConvexOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y - a * b * φ ‖x - y‖
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly concave with modulus `φ` if
`t • f x + (1 - t) • f y + t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (t • x + (1 - t) • y)` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConcaveOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y + a * b * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
@[simp] lemma uniformConvexOn_zero : UniformConvexOn s 0 f ↔ ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConvexOn, ConvexOn]
@[simp] lemma uniformConcaveOn_zero : UniformConcaveOn s 0 f ↔ ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConcaveOn, ConcaveOn]
protected alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.uniformConvexOn_zero⟩ := uniformConvexOn_zero
protected alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.uniformConcaveOn_zero⟩ := uniformConcaveOn_zero
lemma UniformConvexOn.mono (hψφ : ψ ≤ φ) (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) : UniformConvexOn s ψ f :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <| by gcongr; apply hψφ⟩
lemma UniformConcaveOn.mono (hψφ : ψ ≤ φ) (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) : UniformConcaveOn s ψ f :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans' <| by gcongr; apply hψφ⟩
lemma UniformConvexOn.convexOn (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hφ : 0 ≤ φ) : ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simpa using hf.mono hφ
lemma UniformConcaveOn.concaveOn (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hφ : 0 ≤ φ) : ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
simpa using hf.mono hφ
lemma UniformConvexOn.strictConvexOn (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hφ : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → 0 < φ r) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ s f := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab).trans_lt <|
sub_lt_self _ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_ne_zero, ← norm_pos_iff] at hxy
have := hφ _ hxy.ne'
positivity
lemma UniformConcaveOn.strictConcaveOn (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hφ : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → 0 < φ r) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab).trans_lt' <|
lt_add_of_pos_right _ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_ne_zero, ← norm_pos_iff] at hxy
have := hφ _ hxy.ne'
positivity
|
lemma UniformConvexOn.add (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hg : UniformConvexOn s ψ g) :
UniformConvexOn s (φ + ψ) (f + g) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [mul_add, add_add_add_comm, sub_add_sub_comm]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strong.lean | 85 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
/-!
# Properties of cyclic permutations constructed from lists/cycles
In the following, `{α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]`.
## Main definitions
* `Cycle.formPerm`: the cyclic permutation created by looping over a `Cycle α`
* `Equiv.Perm.toList`: the list formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`: the cycle formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`: the equivalence between cyclic permutations `f : Perm α`
and the terms of `Cycle α` that correspond to them
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'`: the same equivalence as `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`
but with evaluation via choosing over fintypes
* The notation `c[1, 2, 3]` to emulate notation of cyclic permutations `(1 2 3)`
* A `Repr` instance for any `Perm α`, by representing the `Finset` of
`Cycle α` that correspond to the cycle factors.
## Main results
* `List.isCycle_formPerm`: a nontrivial list without duplicates, when interpreted as
a permutation, is cyclic
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle`: there is only one nontrivial `Cycle α`
corresponding to each cyclic `f : Perm α`
## Implementation details
The forward direction of `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'` uses `Fintype.choose` of the uniqueness
result, relying on the `Fintype` instance of a `Cycle.Nodup` subtype.
It is unclear if this works faster than the `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`, which relies
on recursion over `Finset.univ`.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ mem_cons_self]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem this
use k
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk]
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
theorem cycleType_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
cycleType l.attach.formPerm = {l.length} := by
rw [← length_attach] at hn
rw [← nodup_attach] at hl
rw [cycleType_eq [l.attach.formPerm]]
· simp only [map, Function.comp_apply]
rw [support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hl, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hl]
· simp
· intro x h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hn
· simp
· simpa using isCycle_formPerm hl hn
· simp
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (hl : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
formPerm l x = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [next_getElem _ hl, formPerm_apply_getElem _ hl]
end List
namespace Cycle
variable [DecidableEq α] (s : Cycle α)
/-- A cycle `s : Cycle α`, given `Nodup s` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α`
where each element in the list is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`.
-/
def formPerm : ∀ s : Cycle α, Nodup s → Equiv.Perm α :=
fun s => Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => List.formPerm l) fun l₁ l₂ (h : l₁ ~r l₂) => by
apply Function.hfunext
· ext
exact h.nodup_iff
· intro h₁ h₂ _
exact heq_of_eq (formPerm_eq_of_isRotated h₁ h)
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_coe (l : List α) (hl : l.Nodup) : formPerm (l : Cycle α) hl = l.formPerm :=
rfl
theorem formPerm_subsingleton (s : Cycle α) (h : Subsingleton s) : formPerm s h.nodup = 1 := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
simp only [formPerm_coe, mk_eq_coe]
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe] at h
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := s
· simp
· simp only [length_eq_zero_iff, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, List.length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h
simp [h]
theorem isCycle_formPerm (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
IsCycle (formPerm s h) := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.isCycle_formPerm h (length_nontrivial hn)
theorem support_formPerm [Fintype α] (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
support (formPerm s h) = s.toFinset := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup s h ?_
rintro _ rfl
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using length_nontrivial hn
theorem formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
formPerm s h x = x := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ hx
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
formPerm s h x = next s h x hx := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next h _ (by simp_all)
nonrec theorem formPerm_reverse (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) :
formPerm s.reverse (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr h) = (formPerm s h)⁻¹ := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using formPerm_reverse _
nonrec theorem formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s s' : Cycle α} {hs : s.Nodup}
{hs' : s'.Nodup} :
s.formPerm hs = s'.formPerm hs' ↔ s = s' ∨ s.Subsingleton ∧ s'.Subsingleton := by
rw [Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff, Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff]
revert s s'
intro s s'
apply @Quotient.inductionOn₂' _ _ _ _ _ s s'
intro l l' hl hl'
simpa using formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff hl hl'
end Cycle
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
/-- `Equiv.Perm.toList (f : Perm α) (x : α)` generates the list `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]`
until looping. That means when `f x = x`, `toList f x = []`.
-/
def toList : List α :=
List.iterate p x (cycleOf p x).support.card
@[simp]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil_iff {p : Perm α} {x} : toList p x = [] ↔ x ∉ p.support := by simp [toList]
@[simp]
theorem length_toList : length (toList p x) = (cycleOf p x).support.card := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_ne_singleton (y : α) : toList p x ≠ [y] := by
intro H
simpa [card_support_ne_one] using congr_arg length H
theorem two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support {p : Perm α} {x : α} :
2 ≤ length (toList p x) ↔ x ∈ p.support := by simp
theorem length_toList_pos_of_mem_support (h : x ∈ p.support) : 0 < length (toList p x) :=
zero_lt_two.trans_le (two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support.mpr h)
theorem getElem_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x)[n] = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated getElem_toList (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem get_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_getElem_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x)[0]'(length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h) = x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated toList_getElem_zero (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem toList_get_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).get ⟨0, (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h)⟩ = x := by simp [toList]
variable {p} {x}
theorem mem_toList_iff {y : α} : y ∈ toList p x ↔ SameCycle p x y ∧ x ∈ p.support := by
simp only [toList, mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hx, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx
rw [← support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨h, hx⟩
simpa using h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
theorem nodup_toList (p : Perm α) (x : α) : Nodup (toList p x) := by
by_cases hx : p x = x
· rw [← not_mem_support, ← toList_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
have hc : IsCycle (cycleOf p x) := isCycle_cycleOf p hx
rw [nodup_iff_injective_getElem]
intro ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
rw [length_toList, ← hc.orderOf] at hm hn
rw [← cycleOf_apply_self, ← Ne, ← mem_support] at hx
simp only [Fin.mk.injEq]
rw [getElem_toList, getElem_toList, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x n, ←
cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x m]
rcases n with - | n <;> rcases m with - | m
· simp
· rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf m.zero_lt_succ hm, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
simp [hx.symm]
· rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf n.zero_lt_succ hn, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
simp [hx]
intro h
have hn' : ¬orderOf (p.cycleOf x) ∣ n.succ := Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt n.zero_lt_succ hn
have hm' : ¬orderOf (p.cycleOf x) ∣ m.succ := Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt m.zero_lt_succ hm
rw [← hc.support_pow_eq_iff] at hn' hm'
rw [← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn, ← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hm, ← pow_inj_mod]
refine support_congr ?_ ?_
· rw [hm', hn']
· rw [hm']
intro y hy
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hc.exists_pow_eq (mem_support.mp hx) (mem_support.mp hy)
rw [← mul_apply, (Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq, mul_apply, h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply,
(Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq]
theorem next_toList_eq_apply (p : Perm α) (x y : α) (hy : y ∈ toList p x) :
next (toList p x) y hy = p y := by
rw [mem_toList_iff] at hy
obtain ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := hy.left.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hy.right
rw [← getElem_toList p x k (by simpa using hk)] at hk'
simp_rw [← hk']
rw [next_getElem _ (nodup_toList _ _), getElem_toList, getElem_toList, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ']
simp_rw [length_toList]
rw [← pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply p (k + 1), IsCycle.orderOf]
exact isCycle_cycleOf _ (mem_support.mp hy.right)
theorem toList_pow_apply_eq_rotate (p : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
p.toList ((p ^ k) x) = (p.toList x).rotate k := by
apply ext_getElem
· simp only [length_toList, cycleOf_self_apply_pow, length_rotate]
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_toList, getElem_rotate, getElem_toList, length_toList,
pow_mod_card_support_cycleOf_self_apply, pow_add, mul_apply]
theorem SameCycle.toList_isRotated {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (h : SameCycle f x y) :
toList f x ~r toList f y := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ f.support
· obtain ⟨_ | k, _, hy⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
· simp only [coe_one, id, pow_zero] at hy
-- Porting note: added `IsRotated.refl`
simp [hy, IsRotated.refl]
use k.succ
rw [← toList_pow_apply_eq_rotate, hy]
· rw [toList_eq_nil_iff.mpr hx, isRotated_nil_iff', eq_comm, toList_eq_nil_iff]
rwa [← h.mem_support_iff]
theorem pow_apply_mem_toList_iff_mem_support {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n) x ∈ p.toList x ↔ x ∈ p.support := by
rw [mem_toList_iff, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
refine fun _ => SameCycle.symm ?_
rw [sameCycle_pow_left]
theorem toList_formPerm_nil (x : α) : toList (formPerm ([] : List α)) x = [] := by simp
theorem toList_formPerm_singleton (x y : α) : toList (formPerm [x]) y = [] := by simp
theorem toList_formPerm_nontrivial (l : List α) (hl : 2 ≤ l.length) (hn : Nodup l) :
toList (formPerm l) (l.get ⟨0, (zero_lt_two.trans_le hl)⟩) = l := by
have hc : l.formPerm.IsCycle := List.isCycle_formPerm hn hl
have hs : l.formPerm.support = l.toFinset := by
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hn ?_
rintro _ rfl
simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hl
rw [toList, hc.cycleOf_eq (mem_support.mp _), hs, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hn]
· refine ext_getElem (by simp) fun k hk hk' => ?_
simp only [get_eq_getElem, getElem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, formPerm_pow_apply_getElem _ hn,
zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk']
· simp [hs]
theorem toList_formPerm_isRotated_self (l : List α) (hl : 2 ≤ l.length) (hn : Nodup l) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ l) : toList (formPerm l) x ~r l := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem hx
have hr : l ~r l.rotate k := ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [formPerm_eq_of_isRotated hn hr]
rw [get_eq_get_rotate l k k]
simp only [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt k.2, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt k.2), Nat.mod_self]
rw [toList_formPerm_nontrivial]
· simp
· simpa using hl
· simpa using hn
theorem formPerm_toList (f : Perm α) (x : α) : formPerm (toList f x) = f.cycleOf x := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [(cycleOf_eq_one_iff f).mpr hx, toList_eq_nil_iff.mpr (not_mem_support.mpr hx),
formPerm_nil]
ext y
by_cases hy : SameCycle f x y
· obtain ⟨k, _, rfl⟩ := hy.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support (mem_support.mpr hx)
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self, List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (nodup_toList f x),
next_toList_eq_apply, pow_succ', mul_apply]
rw [mem_toList_iff]
exact ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, mem_support.mpr hx⟩
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hy, formPerm_apply_of_not_mem]
simp [mem_toList_iff, hy]
/-- Given a cyclic `f : Perm α`, generate the `Cycle α` in the order
of application of `f`. Implemented by finding an element `x : α`
in the support of `f` in `Finset.univ`, and iterating on using
`Equiv.Perm.toList f x`.
-/
def toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : Cycle α :=
Multiset.recOn (Finset.univ : Finset α).val (Quot.mk _ [])
(fun x _ l => if f x = x then l else toList f x)
(by
intro x y _ s
refine heq_of_eq ?_
split_ifs with hx hy hy <;> try rfl
have hc : SameCycle f x y := IsCycle.sameCycle hf hx hy
exact Quotient.sound' hc.toList_isRotated)
theorem toCycle_eq_toList (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) (x : α) (hx : f x ≠ x) :
toCycle f hf = toList f x := by
have key : (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = x ::ₘ Finset.univ.val.erase x := by simp
rw [toCycle, key]
simp [hx]
theorem nodup_toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : (toCycle f hf).Nodup := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
simpa [toCycle_eq_toList f hf x hx] using nodup_toList _ _
theorem nontrivial_toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : (toCycle f hf).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
simp [toCycle_eq_toList f hf x hx, hx, Cycle.nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff (nodup_toList _ _)]
/-- Any cyclic `f : Perm α` is isomorphic to the nontrivial `Cycle α`
that corresponds to repeated application of `f`.
The forward direction is implemented by `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`.
-/
def isoCycle : { f : Perm α // IsCycle f } ≃ { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup ∧ s.Nontrivial } where
toFun f := ⟨toCycle (f : Perm α) f.prop, nodup_toCycle (f : Perm α) f.prop,
nontrivial_toCycle _ f.prop⟩
invFun s := ⟨(s : Cycle α).formPerm s.prop.left, (s : Cycle α).isCycle_formPerm _ s.prop.right⟩
left_inv f := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id f.prop
simpa [toCycle_eq_toList (f : Perm α) f.prop x hx, formPerm_toList, Subtype.ext_iff] using
f.prop.cycleOf_eq hx
right_inv s := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩, hn, ht⟩
obtain ⟨x, -, -, hx, -⟩ := id ht
have hl : 2 ≤ s.length := by simpa using Cycle.length_nontrivial ht
simp only [Cycle.mk_eq_coe, Cycle.nodup_coe_iff, Cycle.mem_coe_iff, Subtype.coe_mk,
Cycle.formPerm_coe] at hn hx ⊢
apply Subtype.ext
dsimp
rw [toCycle_eq_toList _ _ x]
· refine Quotient.sound' ?_
exact toList_formPerm_isRotated_self _ hl hn _ hx
· rw [← mem_support, support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hn]
· simpa using hx
· rintro _ rfl
simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hl
end Fintype
section Finite
variable [Finite α] [DecidableEq α]
|
theorem IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) :
∃! s : Cycle α, ∃ h : s.Nodup, s.formPerm h = f := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ := id hf
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 416 | 420 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
| @[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 346 | 346 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,523 | 1,524 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.Coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := fun con => by simp_all [Prod.ext_iff]
simp [y1ne]
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y₂ ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp_all
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul] }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
neg_add_cancel := neg_add_cancel
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [MulAction R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
lemma pmul_assoc [SemigroupWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos), coe_mk]
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
end MonoidWithZero
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp [hf]
| insert _ _ has ih =>
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
theorem map_div_of_coprime [GroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {l d : ℕ} (hdl : d ∣ l) (hl : (l / d).Coprime d) (hd : f d ≠ 0) :
f (l / d) = f l / f d := by
apply (div_eq_of_eq_mul hd ..).symm
rw [← hf.right hl, Nat.div_mul_cancel hdl]
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_intro ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk_inj] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
Nat.multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f := f) (g := g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ∪ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
theorem map_gcd [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_lcm : f (x.lcm y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y / f (x.lcm y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hf_lcm]
theorem map_lcm [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_gcd : f (x.gcd y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.lcm y) = f x * f y / f (x.gcd y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hf_gcd]
theorem eq_zero_of_squarefree_of_dvd_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {m n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hmn : m ∣ n)
(h_zero : f m = 0) :
f n = 0 := by
rcases hmn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
simp only [MulZeroClass.zero_mul, eq_self_iff_true, hf.map_mul_of_coprime
(coprime_of_squarefree_mul hn), h_zero]
end IsMultiplicative
section SpecialFunctions
/-- The identity on `ℕ` as an `ArithmeticFunction`. -/
def id : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨_root_.id, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem id_apply {x : ℕ} : id x = x :=
rfl
/-- `pow k n = n ^ k`, except `pow 0 0 = 0`. -/
def pow (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
id.ppow k
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply {k n : ℕ} : pow k n = if k = 0 ∧ n = 0 then 0 else n ^ k := by
cases k <;> simp [pow]
theorem pow_zero_eq_zeta : pow 0 = ζ := by
ext n
simp
/-- `σ k n` is the sum of the `k`th powers of the divisors of `n` -/
def sigma (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.sigma] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
theorem sigma_apply {k n : ℕ} : σ k n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k :=
rfl
theorem sigma_apply_prime_pow {k p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ k (p ^ i) = ∑ j ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ (j * k) := by
simp [sigma_apply, divisors_prime_pow hp, Nat.pow_mul]
theorem sigma_one_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 1 n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_one_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ 1 (p ^ i) = ∑ k ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ k := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem sigma_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 0 n = #n.divisors := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : σ 0 (p ^ i) = i + 1 := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma {k : ℕ} : ζ * pow k = σ k := by
ext
rw [sigma, zeta_mul_apply]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [pow_apply, if_neg (not_and_of_not_right _ _)]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_one [MonoidWithZero R] : IsMultiplicative (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2
⟨by simp, by
intro m n hm _hn hmn
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with (rfl | hm')
· simp
rw [one_apply_ne, one_apply_ne hm', zero_mul]
rw [Ne, mul_eq_one, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl hm'⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_zeta : IsMultiplicative ζ :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2 ⟨by simp, by simp +contextual⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_id : IsMultiplicative ArithmeticFunction.id :=
⟨rfl, fun {_ _} _ => rfl⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem IsMultiplicative.ppow [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
{k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (f.ppow k) := by
induction k with
| zero => exact isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
| succ k hi => rw [ppow_succ']; apply hf.pmul hi
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_pow {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (pow k) :=
isMultiplicative_id.ppow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_sigma {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (σ k) := by
rw [← zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma]
apply isMultiplicative_zeta.mul isMultiplicative_pow
/-- `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Omega] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
theorem cardFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : Ω n = n.primeFactorsList.length :=
rfl
lemma cardFactors_zero : Ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem cardFactors_one : Ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardFactors_apply]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Ω n = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => List.length_eq_one_iff.2 ⟨n, primeFactorsList_prime h⟩⟩
cases n with | zero => simp at h | succ n =>
rcases List.length_eq_one_iff.1 h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← prod_primeFactorsList n.add_one_ne_zero, hx, List.prod_singleton]
apply prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
rw [hx, List.mem_singleton]
theorem cardFactors_mul {m n : ℕ} (m0 : m ≠ 0) (n0 : n ≠ 0) : Ω (m * n) = Ω m + Ω n := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← factors_eq,
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_mul m0 n0, factors_eq, factors_eq,
Multiset.card_add, Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_card]
theorem cardFactors_multiset_prod {s : Multiset ℕ} (h0 : s.prod ≠ 0) :
Ω s.prod = (Multiset.map Ω s).sum := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons ih => simp_all [cardFactors_mul, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω p = 1 :=
cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime.2 hp
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω (p ^ k) = k := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.length_replicate]
/-- `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardDistinctFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.omega] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
theorem cardDistinctFactors_zero : ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_one : ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardDistinctFactors]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : ω n = n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem cardDistinctFactors_eq_cardFactors_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
ω n = Ω n ↔ Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList h0, cardDistinctFactors_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← n.primeFactorsList.dedup_sublist.eq_of_length h]
apply List.nodup_dedup
· simp [h.dedup, cardFactors]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
ω (p ^ k) = 1 := by
rw [cardDistinctFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.replicate_dedup hk,
List.length_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : ω p = 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow hp one_ne_zero]
/-- `μ` is the Möbius function. If `n` is squarefree with an even number of distinct prime factors,
`μ n = 1`. If `n` is squarefree with an odd number of distinct prime factors, `μ n = -1`.
If `n` is not squarefree, `μ n = 0`. -/
def moebius : ArithmeticFunction ℤ :=
⟨fun n => if Squarefree n then (-1) ^ cardFactors n else 0, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Moebius] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[simp]
theorem moebius_apply_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : Squarefree n) : μ n = (-1) ^ cardFactors n :=
if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬Squarefree n) : μ n = 0 :=
if_neg h
theorem moebius_apply_one : μ 1 = 1 := by simp
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ Squarefree n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· simp [h, pow_ne_zero]
theorem moebius_eq_or (n : ℕ) : μ n = 0 ∨ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
simp only [moebius, coe_mk]
split_ifs
· right
exact neg_one_pow_eq_or ..
· left
rfl
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
have := moebius_eq_or n
aesop
theorem moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : μ l ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, neg_one_sq, one_pow]
theorem abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : |μ l| = 1 := by
simp only [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, abs_pow, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
theorem moebius_sq {n : ℕ} :
μ n ^ 2 = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [pow_eq_zero_iff, moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h,
zero_pow (show 2 ≠ 0 by norm_num)]
theorem abs_moebius {n : ℕ} :
|μ n| = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h, abs_zero]
theorem abs_moebius_le_one {n : ℕ} : |μ n| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_moebius, apply_ite (· ≤ 1)]
simp
theorem moebius_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : μ p = -1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hp.squarefree, cardFactors_apply_prime hp, pow_one]
theorem moebius_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
μ (p ^ k) = if k = 1 then -1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_one, moebius_apply_prime hp]
rw [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree]
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk, not_and_or]
exact Or.inr h
theorem moebius_apply_isPrimePow_not_prime {n : ℕ} (hn : IsPrimePow n) (hn' : ¬n.Prime) :
μ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩ := (isPrimePow_nat_iff _).1 hn
rw [moebius_apply_prime_pow hp hk.ne', if_neg]
rintro rfl
exact hn' (by simpa)
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_moebius : IsMultiplicative μ := by
rw [IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero]
refine ⟨by simp, fun {n m} hn hm hnm => ?_⟩
simp only [moebius, ZeroHom.coe_mk, coe_mk, ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, Eq.ndrec, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
IsUnit.mul_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff, squarefree_mul hnm, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero,
cardFactors_mul hn hm, pow_add]
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R]
{f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h_mult : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, f d := by
trans (∏ᵖ p ∣ n, ((ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) + f) p)
· simp_rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero, add_apply, natCoe_apply]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp
rw [zeta_apply_ne (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| List.mem_toFinset.mp hp).ne_zero, cast_one]
rw [isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast.prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree h_mult hn,
coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_sub_of_squarefree [CommRing R]
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 - f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, μ d * f d := by
trans (∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + (ArithmeticFunction.pmul (μ : ArithmeticFunction R) f) p))
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp
rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply, ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_prime
(prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList (List.mem_toFinset.mp hp))]
ring
· rw [(isMultiplicative_moebius.intCast.pmul hf).prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree hn]
simp_rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply]
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
@[simp]
theorem moebius_mul_coe_zeta : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
ext n
refine recOnPosPrimePosCoprime ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ n
· intro p n hp hn
rw [coe_mul_zeta_apply, sum_divisors_prime_pow hp, sum_range_succ']
simp_rw [Nat.pow_zero, moebius_apply_one,
moebius_apply_prime_pow hp (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Nat.succ_inj, sum_ite_eq', mem_range,
if_pos hn, neg_add_cancel]
rw [one_apply_ne]
rw [Ne, pow_eq_one_iff]
· exact hp.ne_one
· exact hn.ne'
· rw [ZeroHom.map_zero, ZeroHom.map_zero]
· simp
· intro a b _ha _hb hab ha' hb'
rw [IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime _ hab, ha', hb',
IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime isMultiplicative_one hab]
exact isMultiplicative_moebius.mul isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_moebius : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, moebius_mul_coe_zeta]
@[simp]
theorem coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta [Ring R] : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, moebius_mul_coe_zeta, intCoe_one]
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius [Ring R] : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, coe_zeta_mul_moebius, intCoe_one]
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
instance : Invertible (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) where
invOf := μ
invOf_mul_self := coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta
mul_invOf_self := coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius
/-- A unit in `ArithmeticFunction R` that evaluates to `ζ`, with inverse `μ`. -/
def zetaUnit : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ :=
⟨ζ, μ, coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius, coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zetaUnit : ((zetaUnit : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ζ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inv_zetaUnit : ((zetaUnit⁻¹ : (ArithmeticFunction R)ˣ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = μ :=
rfl
end CommRing
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to an `AddCommGroup`. -/
theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq [AddCommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R} :
(∀ n > 0, ∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, ∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, μ x.fst • g x.snd = f n := by
let f' : ArithmeticFunction R := ⟨fun x => if x = 0 then 0 else f x, if_pos rfl⟩
let g' : ArithmeticFunction R := ⟨fun x => if x = 0 then 0 else g x, if_pos rfl⟩
trans (ζ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) • f' = g'
· rw [ArithmeticFunction.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
rw [coe_zeta_smul_apply]
simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, forall_prop_of_true, succ_pos', if_false, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
simp only [f', g', coe_mk, succ_ne_zero, ite_false]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_]
rw [if_neg (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hx).ne']
trans μ • g' = f'
· constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h, ← mul_smul, moebius_mul_coe_zeta, one_smul]
· rw [← h, ← mul_smul, coe_zeta_mul_moebius, one_smul]
· rw [ArithmeticFunction.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, succ_pos', smul_apply, f', g', coe_mk, succ_ne_zero,
ite_false]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_]
simp [if_neg (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors (snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal hx)).ne']
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `Ring`. -/
theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq [NonAssocRing R] {f g : ℕ → R} :
(∀ n > 0, ∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, ∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, (μ x.fst : R) * g x.snd = f n := by
rw [sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq]
apply forall_congr'
refine fun a => imp_congr_right fun _ => (sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_).congr_left
rw [zsmul_eq_mul]
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `CommGroup`. -/
theorem prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq [CommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R} :
(∀ n > 0, ∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f i = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, ∏ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, g x.snd ^ μ x.fst = f n :=
@sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq (Additive R) _ _ _
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`. -/
theorem prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ℕ → R}
(hf : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → f n ≠ 0) (hg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → g n ≠ 0) :
(∀ n > 0, ∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f i = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, ∏ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, g x.snd ^ μ x.fst = f n := by
refine
Iff.trans
(Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun n => ?_)
(@prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq Rˣ _
(fun n => if h : 0 < n then Units.mk0 (f n) (hf n h) else 1) fun n =>
if h : 0 < n then Units.mk0 (g n) (hg n h) else 1))
(forall_congr' fun n => ?_) <;>
refine imp_congr_right fun hn => ?_
· dsimp
rw [dif_pos hn, ← Units.eq_iff, ← Units.coeHom_apply, map_prod, Units.val_mk0,
prod_congr rfl _]
intro x hx
rw [dif_pos (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hx), Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_mk0]
· dsimp
rw [dif_pos hn, ← Units.eq_iff, ← Units.coeHom_apply, map_prod, Units.val_mk0,
prod_congr rfl _]
intro x hx
rw [dif_pos (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors (Nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal hx)),
Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_zpow_eq_zpow_val, Units.val_mk0]
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to an `AddCommGroup`, where the equalities only hold on a
well-behaved set. -/
theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on [AddCommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R}
(s : Set ℕ) (hs : ∀ m n, m ∣ n → n ∈ s → m ∈ s) :
(∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i) = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, μ x.fst • g x.snd) = f n := by
constructor
· intro h
let G := fun (n : ℕ) => (∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i)
intro n hn hnP
suffices ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, μ (n/d) • G d = f n by
rw [Nat.sum_divisorsAntidiagonal' (f := fun x y => μ x • g y), ← this, sum_congr rfl]
intro d hd
rw [← h d (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hd) <| hs d n (Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors hd) hnP]
rw [← Nat.sum_divisorsAntidiagonal' (f := fun x y => μ x • G y)]
apply sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq.mp _ n hn
intro _ _; rfl
· intro h
let F := fun (n : ℕ) => ∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, μ x.fst • g x.snd
intro n hn hnP
suffices ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, F d = g n by
rw [← this, sum_congr rfl]
intro d hd
rw [← h d (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hd) <| hs d n (Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors hd) hnP]
apply sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq.mpr _ n hn
intro _ _; rfl
theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on' [AddCommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R}
(s : Set ℕ) (hs : ∀ m n, m ∣ n → n ∈ s → m ∈ s) (hs₀ : 0 ∉ s) :
(∀ n ∈ s, (∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i) = g n) ↔
∀ n ∈ s, (∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, μ x.fst • g x.snd) = f n := by
have : ∀ P : ℕ → Prop, ((∀ n ∈ s, P n) ↔ (∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → P n)) := fun P ↦ by
refine forall_congr' (fun n ↦ ⟨fun h _ ↦ h, fun h hn ↦ h ?_ hn⟩)
contrapose! hs₀
simpa [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp hs₀] using hn
simpa only [this] using sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on s hs
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `Ring`, where the equalities only hold on a well-behaved
set. -/
theorem sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on [NonAssocRing R] {f g : ℕ → R}
(s : Set ℕ) (hs : ∀ m n, m ∣ n → n ∈ s → m ∈ s) :
(∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∑ i ∈ n.divisors, f i) = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, n ∈ s →
(∑ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, (μ x.fst : R) * g x.snd) = f n := by
rw [sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on s hs]
apply forall_congr'
intro a; refine imp_congr_right ?_
refine fun _ => imp_congr_right fun _ => (sum_congr rfl fun x _hx => ?_).congr_left
rw [zsmul_eq_mul]
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `CommGroup`, where the equalities only hold on a
well-behaved set. -/
theorem prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on [CommGroup R] {f g : ℕ → R}
(s : Set ℕ) (hs : ∀ m n, m ∣ n → n ∈ s → m ∈ s) :
(∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f i) = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∏ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, g x.snd ^ μ x.fst) = f n :=
@sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on (Additive R) _ _ _ s hs
/-- Möbius inversion for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`, where the equalities only hold on
a well-behaved set. -/
theorem prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero [CommGroupWithZero R]
(s : Set ℕ) (hs : ∀ m n, m ∣ n → n ∈ s → m ∈ s) {f g : ℕ → R}
(hf : ∀ n > 0, f n ≠ 0) (hg : ∀ n > 0, g n ≠ 0) :
(∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f i) = g n) ↔
∀ n > 0, n ∈ s → (∏ x ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, g x.snd ^ μ x.fst) = f n := by
refine
Iff.trans
(Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun n => ?_)
(@prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on Rˣ _
(fun n => if h : 0 < n then Units.mk0 (f n) (hf n h) else 1)
(fun n => if h : 0 < n then Units.mk0 (g n) (hg n h) else 1)
s hs) )
(forall_congr' fun n => ?_) <;>
refine imp_congr_right fun hn => ?_
· dsimp
rw [dif_pos hn, ← Units.eq_iff, ← Units.coeHom_apply, map_prod, Units.val_mk0,
prod_congr rfl _]
intro x hx
rw [dif_pos (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors hx), Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_mk0]
· dsimp
rw [dif_pos hn, ← Units.eq_iff, ← Units.coeHom_apply, map_prod, Units.val_mk0,
prod_congr rfl _]
intro x hx
rw [dif_pos (Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors (Nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal hx)),
Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_zpow_eq_zpow_val, Units.val_mk0]
end SpecialFunctions
theorem _root_.Nat.card_divisors {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
#n.divisors = n.primeFactors.prod (n.factorization · + 1) := by
rw [← sigma_zero_apply, isMultiplicative_sigma.multiplicative_factorization _ hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr n.support_factorization fun _ h =>
sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow <| Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors h
theorem _root_.Nat.sum_divisors {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ d ∈ n.divisors, d = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, ∑ k ∈ .range (n.factorization p + 1), p ^ k := by
rw [← sigma_one_apply, isMultiplicative_sigma.multiplicative_factorization _ hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr n.support_factorization fun _ h =>
sigma_one_apply_prime_pow <| Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors h
end ArithmeticFunction
namespace Nat.Coprime
open ArithmeticFunction
theorem card_divisors_mul {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
#(m * n).divisors = #m.divisors * #n.divisors := by
simp only [← sigma_zero_apply, isMultiplicative_sigma.map_mul_of_coprime hmn]
theorem sum_divisors_mul {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
∑ d ∈ (m * n).divisors, d = (∑ d ∈ m.divisors, d) * ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, d := by
simp only [← sigma_one_apply, isMultiplicative_sigma.map_mul_of_coprime hmn]
end Nat.Coprime
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 1,398 | 1,402 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
|
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 429 | 439 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
/-!
# Subalgebras in towers of algebras
In this file we prove facts about subalgebras in towers of algebra.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `Algebra A S`,
`Algebra R S`, `Algebra R A` and `IsScalarTower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
## Main results
* `IsScalarTower.Subalgebra`: if `A/S/R` is a tower and `S₀` is a subalgebra
between `S` and `R`, then `A/S/S₀` is a tower
* `IsScalarTower.Subalgebra'`: if `A/S/R` is a tower and `S₀` is a subalgebra
between `S` and `R`, then `A/S₀/R` is a tower
* `Subalgebra.restrictScalars`: turn an `S`-subalgebra of `A` into an `R`-subalgebra of `A`,
given that `A/S/R` is a tower
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁ v₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁) (M : Type v₁)
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
variable {A}
theorem lmul_algebraMap (x : R) : Algebra.lmul R A (algebraMap R A x) = Algebra.lsmul R R A x :=
Eq.symm <| LinearMap.ext <| smul_def x
end Algebra
namespace IsScalarTower
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A]
instance subalgebra (S₀ : Subalgebra R S) : IsScalarTower S₀ S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq fun _ ↦ rfl
variable [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
instance subalgebra' (S₀ : Subalgebra R S) : IsScalarTower R S₀ A :=
@IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq R S₀ A _ _ _ _ _ _ fun _ ↦
(IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S A _ :)
end Semiring
end IsScalarTower
namespace Subalgebra
open IsScalarTower
section Semiring
variable {S A B} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S B] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
/-- Given a tower `A / ↥U / S / R` of algebras, where `U` is an `S`-subalgebra of `A`, reinterpret
`U` as an `R`-subalgebra of `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (U : Subalgebra S A) : Subalgebra R A :=
{ U with
algebraMap_mem' := fun x ↦ by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A]
exact U.algebraMap_mem _ }
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {U : Subalgebra S A} : (restrictScalars R U : Set A) = (U : Set A) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_top : restrictScalars R (⊤ : Subalgebra S A) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by dsimp -- Porting note: why does `rfl` not work instead of `by dsimp`?
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_toSubmodule {U : Subalgebra S A} :
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (U.restrictScalars R) = U.toSubmodule.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrictScalars {U : Subalgebra S A} {x : A} : x ∈ restrictScalars R U ↔ x ∈ U :=
Iff.rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : Subalgebra S A → Subalgebra R A) := fun U V H ↦
ext fun x ↦ by rw [← mem_restrictScalars R, H, mem_restrictScalars]
/-- Produces an `R`-algebra map from `U.restrictScalars R` given an `S`-algebra map from `U`.
This is a special case of `AlgHom.restrictScalars` that can be helpful in elaboration. -/
@[simp]
def ofRestrictScalars (U : Subalgebra S A) (f : U →ₐ[S] B) : U.restrictScalars R →ₐ[R] B :=
f.restrictScalars R
|
end Semiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Tower.lean | 112 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
add_comm g f ▸ hg.add_convexOn hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.add (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_convexOn hg.dual
theorem ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_strictConvexOn hg.dual
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_convexOn (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_concaveOn (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • r + b • r :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hx.2 ha)
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hy.2.le hb.le))
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab _⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
theorem ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ f q.1 ≤ q.2) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } := by
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine ⟨hf.1 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • p.1 + b • q.1) ≤ a • f p.1 + b • f q.1 := hf.2 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • p.2 + b • q.2 := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hp.2 ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hq.2 hb.le)
theorem ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ q.2 ≤ f q.1) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp hq
theorem ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.mpr fun p hp q hq =>
hf.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp ⟨hq.1, hq.2.le⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_strict_epigraph
end Module
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f g : E → β}
/-- The pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex. -/
theorem ConvexOn.sup (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
refine ⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => sup_le ?_ ?_⟩
· calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left
· calc
g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • g x + b • g y := hg.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right
/-- The pointwise minimum of concave functions is concave. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.inf (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- The pointwise maximum of strictly convex functions is strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.sup (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
max_lt
(calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left)
(calc
g (a • x + b • y) < a • g x + b • g y := hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right)⟩
/-- The pointwise minimum of strictly concave functions is strictly concave. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.inf (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment hx hy hz
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) < max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
min (f x) (f y) < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : f z < max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : min (f x) (f y) < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_on_openSegment hx hy hxy hz
end LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section OrderedSMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left h ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y) :
f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x) :
f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb.le hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z ≤ f y) : f x ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha.le hb hab hxz
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z ≤ f x) : f y ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le hx hy hz hxz
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/- The following lemmas don't require `Module 𝕜 E` if you add the hypothesis `x ≠ y`. At the time of
the writing, we decided the resulting lemmas wouldn't be useful. Feel free to reintroduce them. -/
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f x :=
not_le.1 fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le) (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) < f y) :
f x < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) < f x) :
f y < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y < f z) : f z < f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z < f y) : f x < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x < f z) : f z < f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hxz
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z < f x) : f y < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt hx hy hz hxz
end Module
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
{s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/-- A function `-f` is convex iff `f` is concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_convexOn_iff : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp? [neg_apply, neg_le, add_comm] at h says
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, le_add_neg_iff_add_le, add_comm,
add_neg_le_iff_le_add] at h
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A function `-f` is concave iff `f` is convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_concaveOn_iff : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_convexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
/-- A function `-f` is strictly convex iff `f` is strictly concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConvexOn_iff : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp only [ne_eq, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt, add_comm,
add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add] at h
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A function `-f` is strictly concave iff `f` is strictly convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConcaveOn_iff : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_strictConvexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_convexOn_iff
alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_concaveOn_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConvexOn_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConcaveOn_iff
theorem ConvexOn.sub (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem ConcaveOn.sub (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem ConvexOn.sub_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConvexOn hg.neg
theorem ConcaveOn.sub_strictConvexOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConcaveOn hg.neg
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub_concaveOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_convexOn hg.neg
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub_convexOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_concaveOn hg.neg
end OrderedAddCommGroup
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCancelCommMonoid
variable [AddCancelCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β]
{s : Set E}
{f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves strict convexity. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ < a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ((add_right_injective c).ne hxy) ha hb hab⟩
/-- Right translation preserves strict concavity. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves strict convexity. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_left (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves strict concavity. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hf.translate_right c
end AddCancelCommMonoid
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.smul {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun x => c • f x :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
c • f (a • x + b • y) ≤ c • (a • f x + b • f y) :=
smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) hc
_ = a • c • f x + b • c • f y := by rw [smul_add, smul_comm c, smul_comm c]⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.smul {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun x => c • f x :=
hf.dual.smul hc
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If a function is convex on `s`, it remains convex when precomposed by an affine map. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_affineMap {f : F → β} (g : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.affine_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
(f ∘ g) (a • x + b • y) = f (g (a • x + b • y)) := rfl
_ = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [Convex.combo_affine_apply hab]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If a function is concave on `s`, it remains concave when precomposed by an affine map. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_affineMap {f : F → β} (g : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_affineMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
theorem convexOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b →
f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) ≤ (a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y :=
and_congr Iff.rfl ⟨by
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
apply h hx hy (div_nonneg ha hab.le) (div_nonneg hb hab.le)
rw [← add_div, div_self hab.ne'], by
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
simpa [hab, zero_lt_one] using h hx hy ha hb⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b →
(a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y ≤ f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) :=
convexOn_iff_div (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem strictConvexOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) < (a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y :=
and_congr Iff.rfl ⟨by
intro h x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb
have hab := add_pos ha hb
apply h hx hy hxy (div_pos ha hab) (div_pos hb hab)
rw [← add_div, div_self hab.ne'], by
intro h x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
simpa [hab, zero_lt_one] using h hx hy hxy ha hb⟩
theorem strictConcaveOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
(a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y < f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) :=
strictConvexOn_iff_div (β := βᵒᵈ)
end SMul
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end LinearOrderedField
section OrderIso
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [SMul 𝕜 α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [SMul 𝕜 β]
theorem OrderIso.strictConvexOn_symm (f : α ≃o β) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 univ f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 univ f.symm := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hxy' : x' ≠ y' := by rw [← f.injective.ne_iff, ← hx'', ← hy'']; exact hxy
simp only [hx'', hy'', OrderIso.symm_apply_apply, gt_iff_lt]
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
exact hf.2 (by simp : x' ∈ univ) (by simp : y' ∈ univ) hxy' ha hb hab
theorem OrderIso.convexOn_symm (f : α ≃o β) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 univ f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 univ f.symm := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [hx'', hy'', OrderIso.symm_apply_apply, gt_iff_lt]
rw [← f.le_iff_le, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
exact hf.2 (by simp : x' ∈ univ) (by simp : y' ∈ univ) ha hb hab
theorem OrderIso.strictConcaveOn_symm (f : α ≃o β) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 univ f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 univ f.symm := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hxy' : x' ≠ y' := by rw [← f.injective.ne_iff, ← hx'', ← hy'']; exact hxy
simp only [hx'', hy'', OrderIso.symm_apply_apply, gt_iff_lt]
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
exact hf.2 (by simp : x' ∈ univ) (by simp : y' ∈ univ) hxy' ha hb hab
theorem OrderIso.concaveOn_symm (f : α ≃o β) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 univ f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 univ f.symm := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [hx'', hy'', OrderIso.symm_apply_apply, gt_iff_lt]
rw [← f.le_iff_le, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
exact hf.2 (by simp : x' ∈ univ) (by simp : y' ∈ univ) ha hb hab
end OrderIso
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β]
{f : E → β} {s : Set E} {x y : E}
/-- A strictly convex function admits at most one global minimum. -/
lemma StrictConvexOn.eq_of_isMinOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfx : IsMinOn f s x)
(hfy : IsMinOn f s y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x = y := by
by_contra hxy
let z := (2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ • x + (2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ • y
have hz : z ∈ s := hf.1 hx hy (by norm_num) (by norm_num) <| by norm_num
refine lt_irrefl (f z) ?_
calc
f z < _ := hf.2 hx hy hxy (by norm_num) (by norm_num) <| by norm_num
_ ≤ (2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ • f z + (2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ • f z := by gcongr; exacts [hfx hz, hfy hz]
_ = f z := by rw [← _root_.add_smul]; norm_num
/-- A strictly concave function admits at most one global maximum. -/
lemma StrictConcaveOn.eq_of_isMaxOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfx : IsMaxOn f s x)
(hfy : IsMaxOn f s y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x = y :=
hf.dual.eq_of_isMinOn hfx hfy hx hy
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
[Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β]
{x y z : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → β}
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le'' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) (hxy : x < y)
(hyz : y ≤ z) (h : f x ≤ f y) : f y ≤ f z :=
hyz.eq_or_lt.elim (fun hyz => (congr_arg f hyz).le) fun hyz =>
hf.le_right_of_left_le hx hz (Ioo_subset_openSegment ⟨hxy, hyz⟩) h
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le'' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) (hxy : x ≤ y)
(hyz : y < z) (h : f z ≤ f y) : f y ≤ f x :=
hxy.eq_or_lt.elim (fun hxy => (congr_arg f hxy).ge) fun hxy =>
hf.le_left_of_right_le hx hz (Ioo_subset_openSegment ⟨hxy, hyz⟩) h
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left'' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s)
(hxy : x < y) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : f y ≤ f x) : f z ≤ f y :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le'' hx hz hxy hyz h
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right'' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s)
(hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y < z) (h : f y ≤ f z) : f x ≤ f y :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le'' hx hz hxy hyz h
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
end LinearOrderedField
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 1,108 | 1,115 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Language
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Regular Expressions
This file contains the formal definition for regular expressions and basic lemmas. Note these are
regular expressions in terms of formal language theory. Note this is different to regex's used in
computer science such as the POSIX standard.
## TODO
* Show that this regular expressions and DFA/NFA's are equivalent. -/
open List Set
open Computability
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*}
-- Disable generation of unneeded lemmas which the simpNF linter would complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- This is the definition of regular expressions. The names used here is to mirror the definition
of a Kleene algebra (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene_algebra).
* `0` (`zero`) matches nothing
* `1` (`epsilon`) matches only the empty string
* `char a` matches only the string 'a'
* `star P` matches any finite concatenation of strings which match `P`
* `P + Q` (`plus P Q`) matches anything which match `P` or `Q`
* `P * Q` (`comp P Q`) matches `x ++ y` if `x` matches `P` and `y` matches `Q`
-/
inductive RegularExpression (α : Type u) : Type u
| zero : RegularExpression α
| epsilon : RegularExpression α
| char : α → RegularExpression α
| plus : RegularExpression α → RegularExpression α → RegularExpression α
| comp : RegularExpression α → RegularExpression α → RegularExpression α
| star : RegularExpression α → RegularExpression α
namespace RegularExpression
variable {a b : α}
instance : Inhabited (RegularExpression α) :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : Add (RegularExpression α) :=
⟨plus⟩
instance : Mul (RegularExpression α) :=
⟨comp⟩
instance : One (RegularExpression α) :=
⟨epsilon⟩
instance : Zero (RegularExpression α) :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : Pow (RegularExpression α) ℕ :=
⟨fun n r => npowRec r n⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : (zero : RegularExpression α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_def : (epsilon : RegularExpression α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem plus_def (P Q : RegularExpression α) : plus P Q = P + Q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_def (P Q : RegularExpression α) : comp P Q = P * Q :=
rfl
-- This was renamed to `matches'` during the port of Lean 4 as `matches` is a reserved word.
/-- `matches' P` provides a language which contains all strings that `P` matches -/
-- Porting note: was '@[simp] but removed based on
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/simpNF.20issues.20in.20Computability.2ERegularExpressions.20!4.232306/near/328355362
def matches' : RegularExpression α → Language α
| 0 => 0
| 1 => 1
| char a => {[a]}
| P + Q => P.matches' + Q.matches'
| P * Q => P.matches' * Q.matches'
| star P => P.matches'∗
@[simp]
theorem matches'_zero : (0 : RegularExpression α).matches' = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem matches'_epsilon : (1 : RegularExpression α).matches' = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem matches'_char (a : α) : (char a).matches' = {[a]} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem matches'_add (P Q : RegularExpression α) : (P + Q).matches' = P.matches' + Q.matches' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem matches'_mul (P Q : RegularExpression α) : (P * Q).matches' = P.matches' * Q.matches' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem matches'_pow (P : RegularExpression α) : ∀ n : ℕ, (P ^ n).matches' = P.matches' ^ n
| 0 => matches'_epsilon
| n + 1 => (matches'_mul _ _).trans <| Eq.trans
(congrFun (congrArg HMul.hMul (matches'_pow P n)) (matches' P))
(pow_succ _ n).symm
@[simp]
theorem matches'_star (P : RegularExpression α) : P.star.matches' = P.matches'∗ :=
rfl
/-- `matchEpsilon P` is true if and only if `P` matches the empty string -/
def matchEpsilon : RegularExpression α → Bool
| 0 => false
| 1 => true
| char _ => false
| P + Q => P.matchEpsilon || Q.matchEpsilon
| P * Q => P.matchEpsilon && Q.matchEpsilon
| star _P => true
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- `P.deriv a` matches `x` if `P` matches `a :: x`, the Brzozowski derivative of `P` with respect
to `a` -/
def deriv : RegularExpression α → α → RegularExpression α
| 0, _ => 0
| 1, _ => 0
| char a₁, a₂ => if a₁ = a₂ then 1 else 0
| P + Q, a => deriv P a + deriv Q a
| P * Q, a => if P.matchEpsilon then deriv P a * Q + deriv Q a else deriv P a * Q
| star P, a => deriv P a * star P
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero (a : α) : deriv 0 a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deriv_one (a : α) : deriv 1 a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deriv_char_self (a : α) : deriv (char a) a = 1 :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem deriv_char_of_ne (h : a ≠ b) : deriv (char a) b = 0 :=
if_neg h
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add (P Q : RegularExpression α) (a : α) : deriv (P + Q) a = deriv P a + deriv Q a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deriv_star (P : RegularExpression α) (a : α) : deriv P.star a = deriv P a * star P :=
rfl
/-- `P.rmatch x` is true if and only if `P` matches `x`. This is a computable definition equivalent
to `matches'`. -/
def rmatch : RegularExpression α → List α → Bool
| P, [] => matchEpsilon P
| P, a :: as => rmatch (P.deriv a) as
@[simp]
theorem zero_rmatch (x : List α) : rmatch 0 x = false := by
induction x <;> simp [rmatch, matchEpsilon, *]
theorem one_rmatch_iff (x : List α) : rmatch 1 x ↔ x = [] := by
induction x <;> simp [rmatch, matchEpsilon, *]
theorem char_rmatch_iff (a : α) (x : List α) : rmatch (char a) x ↔ x = [a] := by
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩
· exact of_decide_eq_true rfl
· rcases x with - | ⟨head, tail⟩
· rw [rmatch, deriv, List.singleton_inj]
split <;> tauto
· rw [rmatch, rmatch, deriv, cons.injEq]
split
· simp_rw [deriv_one, zero_rmatch, reduceCtorEq, and_false]
· simp_rw [deriv_zero, zero_rmatch, reduceCtorEq, and_false]
theorem add_rmatch_iff (P Q : RegularExpression α) (x : List α) :
(P + Q).rmatch x ↔ P.rmatch x ∨ Q.rmatch x := by
induction' x with _ _ ih generalizing P Q
· simp only [rmatch, matchEpsilon, Bool.or_eq_true_iff]
· rw [rmatch, deriv_add]
exact ih _ _
theorem mul_rmatch_iff (P Q : RegularExpression α) (x : List α) :
(P * Q).rmatch x ↔ ∃ t u : List α, x = t ++ u ∧ P.rmatch t ∧ Q.rmatch u := by
induction' x with a x ih generalizing P Q
· rw [rmatch]; simp only [matchEpsilon]
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨[], [], rfl, ?_⟩
rw [rmatch, rmatch]
rwa [Bool.and_eq_true_iff] at h
· rintro ⟨t, u, h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨ht, hu⟩ := List.append_eq_nil_iff.1 h₁.symm
subst ht hu
repeat rw [rmatch] at h₂
simp [h₂]
· rw [rmatch]; simp only [deriv]
split_ifs with hepsilon
· rw [add_rmatch_iff, ih]
constructor
· rintro (⟨t, u, _⟩ | h)
· exact ⟨a :: t, u, by tauto⟩
· exact ⟨[], a :: x, rfl, hepsilon, h⟩
· rintro ⟨t, u, h, hP, hQ⟩
rcases t with - | ⟨b, t⟩
· right
rw [List.nil_append] at h
rw [← h] at hQ
exact hQ
· left
rw [List.cons_append, List.cons_eq_cons] at h
refine ⟨t, u, h.2, ?_, hQ⟩
rw [rmatch] at hP
convert hP
exact h.1
· rw [ih]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨t, u, h, hP, hQ⟩
· exact ⟨a :: t, u, by tauto⟩
· rcases t with - | ⟨b, t⟩
· contradiction
· rw [List.cons_append, List.cons_eq_cons] at h
refine ⟨t, u, h.2, ?_, hQ⟩
rw [rmatch] at hP
convert hP
exact h.1
theorem star_rmatch_iff (P : RegularExpression α) :
∀ x : List α, (star P).rmatch x ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x
= S.flatten ∧ ∀ t ∈ S, t ≠ [] ∧ P.rmatch t :=
fun x => by
have IH := fun t (_h : List.length t < List.length x) => star_rmatch_iff P t
clear star_rmatch_iff
constructor
· rcases x with - | ⟨a, x⟩
· intro _h
use []; dsimp; tauto
· rw [rmatch, deriv, mul_rmatch_iff]
rintro ⟨t, u, hs, ht, hu⟩
have hwf : u.length < (List.cons a x).length := by
rw [hs, List.length_cons, List.length_append]
omega
rw [IH _ hwf] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨S', hsum, helem⟩
use (a :: t) :: S'
constructor
· simp [hs, hsum]
· intro t' ht'
cases ht' with
| head ht' =>
simp only [ne_eq, not_false_iff, true_and, rmatch, reduceCtorEq]
exact ht
| tail _ ht' => exact helem t' ht'
· rintro ⟨S, hsum, helem⟩
rcases x with - | ⟨a, x⟩
· rfl
· rw [rmatch, deriv, mul_rmatch_iff]
rcases S with - | ⟨t', U⟩
· exact ⟨[], [], by tauto⟩
· obtain - | ⟨b, t⟩ := t'
· simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, List.mem_cons] at helem
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne, false_and] at helem
simp only [List.flatten, List.cons_append, List.cons_eq_cons] at hsum
refine ⟨t, U.flatten, hsum.2, ?_, ?_⟩
· specialize helem (b :: t) (by simp)
rw [rmatch] at helem
convert helem.2
exact hsum.1
· have hwf : U.flatten.length < (List.cons a x).length := by
rw [hsum.1, hsum.2]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_flatten, List.length]
omega
rw [IH _ hwf]
refine ⟨U, rfl, fun t h => helem t ?_⟩
right
assumption
termination_by t => (P, t.length)
@[simp]
theorem rmatch_iff_matches' (P : RegularExpression α) (x : List α) :
P.rmatch x ↔ x ∈ P.matches' := by
induction P generalizing x with
| zero =>
rw [zero_def, zero_rmatch]
tauto
| epsilon =>
rw [one_def, one_rmatch_iff, matches'_epsilon, Language.mem_one]
| char =>
rw [char_rmatch_iff]
rfl
| plus _ _ ih₁ ih₂ =>
rw [plus_def, add_rmatch_iff, ih₁, ih₂]
rfl
| comp P Q ih₁ ih₂ =>
simp only [comp_def, mul_rmatch_iff, matches'_mul, Language.mem_mul, *]
tauto
| star _ ih =>
simp only [star_rmatch_iff, matches'_star, ih, Language.mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty, and_comm]
instance (P : RegularExpression α) : DecidablePred (· ∈ P.matches') := fun _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ (rmatch_iff_matches' _ _)
end DecidableEq
/-- Map the alphabet of a regular expression. -/
@[simp]
def map (f : α → β) : RegularExpression α → RegularExpression β
| 0 => 0
| 1 => 1
| char a => char (f a)
| R + S => map f R + map f S
| R * S => map f R * map f S
| star R => star (map f R)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (f : α → β) (P : RegularExpression α) :
∀ n : ℕ, map f (P ^ n) = map f P ^ n
| 0 => by unfold map; rfl
| n + 1 => (congr_arg (· * map f P) (RegularExpression.map_pow f P n) :)
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ P : RegularExpression α, P.map id = P
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| char _ => rfl
| R + S => by simp_rw [map, map_id]
| R * S => by simp_rw [map, map_id]
| star R => by simp_rw [map, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : ∀ P : RegularExpression α, (P.map f).map g = P.map (g ∘ f)
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| char _ => rfl
| R + S => by simp only [map, Function.comp_apply, map_map]
| R * S => by simp only [map, Function.comp_apply, map_map]
| star R => by simp only [map, Function.comp_apply, map_map]
/-- The language of the map is the map of the language. -/
@[simp]
theorem matches'_map (f : α → β) :
∀ P : RegularExpression α, (P.map f).matches' = Language.map f P.matches'
| 0 => (map_zero _).symm
| 1 => (map_one _).symm
| char a => by
rw [eq_comm]
exact image_singleton
| R + S => by simp only [matches'_map, map, matches'_add, map_add]
| R * S => by simp [matches'_map]
| star R => by simp [matches'_map]
end RegularExpression
| Mathlib/Computability/RegularExpressions.lean | 400 | 406 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
| rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 297 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Colimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Instances
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.LocalPredicate
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `PrimeSpectrum R`.
We define the structure sheaf on `TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)`, for a commutative ring `R` and prove
basic properties about it. We define this as a subsheaf of the sheaf of dependent functions into the
localizations, cut out by the condition that the function must be locally equal to a ratio of
elements of `R`.
Because the condition "is equal to a fraction" passes to smaller open subsets,
the subset of functions satisfying this condition is automatically a subpresheaf.
Because the condition "is locally equal to a fraction" is local,
it is also a subsheaf.
(It may be helpful to refer back to `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafOfFunctions.lean`,
where we show that dependent functions into any type family form a sheaf,
and also `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/LocalPredicate.lean`, where we characterise the predicates
which pick out sub-presheaves and sub-sheaves of these sheaves.)
We also set up the ring structure, obtaining
`structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)`.
We then construct two basic isomorphisms, relating the structure sheaf to the underlying ring `R`.
First, `StructureSheaf.stalkIso` gives an isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf
at a point `p` and the localization of `R` at the prime ideal `p`. Second,
`StructureSheaf.basicOpenIso` gives an isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basicOpen f`
and the localization of `R` at the submonoid of powers of `f`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R]
open TopCat
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open Opposite
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The prime spectrum, just as a topological space.
-/
def PrimeSpectrum.Top : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
namespace StructureSheaf
/-- The type family over `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of the localization over each point.
-/
def Localizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Type u :=
Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance commRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance localRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : IsLocalRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsLocalRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Inhabited (Localizations R P) :=
⟨1⟩
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) : Algebra R (Localizations R x) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal)
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (Localizations R x) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal :=
Localization.isLocalization
variable {R}
/-- The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def IsFraction {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) : Prop :=
∃ r s : R, ∀ x : U, ¬s ∈ x.1.asIdeal ∧ f x * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r
theorem IsFraction.eq_mk' {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} {f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x}
(hf : IsFraction f) :
∃ r s : R,
∀ x : U,
∃ hs : s ∉ x.1.asIdeal,
f x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime _) r
(⟨s, hs⟩ : (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, s, h⟩
refine ⟨r, s, fun x => ⟨(h x).1, (IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr ?_).symm⟩⟩
exact (h x).2.symm
variable (R)
/-- The predicate `IsFraction` is "prelocal",
in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def isFractionPrelocal : PrelocalPredicate (Localizations R) where
pred {_} f := IsFraction f
res := by rintro V U i f ⟨r, s, w⟩; exact ⟨r, s, fun x => w (i x)⟩
/-- We will define the structure sheaf as
the subsheaf of all dependent functions in `Π x : U, Localizations R x`
consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed as a ratio of
(the images in the localization of) elements of `R`.
Quoting Hartshorne:
For an open set $U ⊆ Spec A$, we define $𝒪(U)$ to be the set of functions
$s : U → ⨆_{𝔭 ∈ U} A_𝔭$, such that $s(𝔭) ∈ A_𝔭$ for each $𝔭$,
and such that $s$ is locally a quotient of elements of $A$:
to be precise, we require that for each $𝔭 ∈ U$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $𝔭$,
contained in $U$, and elements $a, f ∈ A$, such that for each $𝔮 ∈ V, f ∉ 𝔮$,
and $s(𝔮) = a/f$ in $A_𝔮$.
Now Hartshorne had the disadvantage of not knowing about dependent functions,
so we replace his circumlocution about functions into a disjoint union with
`Π x : U, Localizations x`.
-/
def isLocallyFraction : LocalPredicate (Localizations R) :=
(isFractionPrelocal R).sheafify
@[simp]
theorem isLocallyFraction_pred {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) :
(isLocallyFraction R).pred f =
∀ x : U,
∃ (V : _) (_ : x.1 ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U),
∃ r s : R,
∀ y : V, ¬s ∈ y.1.asIdeal ∧ f (i y : U) * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r :=
rfl
/-- The functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction` form a subring.
-/
def sectionsSubring (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
Subring (∀ x : U.unop, Localizations R x) where
carrier := { f | (isLocallyFraction R).pred f }
zero_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 0, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
one_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 1, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
add_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * sb + rb * sa, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.add_apply, RingHom.map_mul, add_mul, RingHom.map_add] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_assoc]
congr 2
rw [mul_comm]
neg_mem' := by
intro a ha x
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, r, s, w⟩
refine ⟨V, m, i, -r, s, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases w y with ⟨nm, w⟩
fconstructor
· exact nm
· simp only [RingHom.map_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
rw [← w]
simp only [neg_mul]
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * rb, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.mul_apply, RingHom.map_mul] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
end StructureSheaf
open StructureSheaf
/-- The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRingCat`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction`.
-/
def structureSheafInType : Sheaf (Type u) (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
subsheafToTypes (isLocallyFraction R)
instance commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
CommRing ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U) :=
(sectionsSubring R U).toCommRing
open PrimeSpectrum
/-- The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRingCat`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf.
-/
@[simps obj_carrier]
def structurePresheafInCommRing : Presheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) where
obj U := CommRingCat.of ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U)
map {_ _} i := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun := (structureSheafInType R).1.map i
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- Some glue, verifying that the structure presheaf valued in `CommRingCat` agrees
with the `Type` valued structure presheaf.
-/
def structurePresheafCompForget :
structurePresheafInCommRing R ⋙ forget CommRingCat ≅ (structureSheafInType R).1 :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
open TopCat.Presheaf
/-- The structure sheaf on $Spec R$, valued in `CommRingCat`.
This is provided as a bundled `SheafedSpace` as `Spec.SheafedSpace R` later.
-/
def Spec.structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
⟨structurePresheafInCommRing R,
(-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRingCat`.
isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
_ _).mpr
(isSheaf_of_iso (structurePresheafCompForget R).symm (structureSheafInType R).cond)⟩
open Spec (structureSheaf)
namespace StructureSheaf
@[simp]
theorem res_apply (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U)
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : V) :
((structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s).1 x = (s.1 (i x) :) :=
rfl
/-
Notation in this comment
X = Spec R
OX = structure sheaf
In the following we construct an isomorphism between OX_p and R_p given any point p corresponding
to a prime ideal in R.
We do this via 8 steps:
1. def const (f g : R) (V) (hv : V ≤ D_g) : OX(V) [for api]
2. def toOpen (U) : R ⟶ OX(U)
3. [2] def toStalk (p : Spec R) : R ⟶ OX_p
4. [2] def toBasicOpen (f : R) : R_f ⟶ OX(D_f)
5. [3] def localizationToStalk (p : Spec R) : R_p ⟶ OX_p
6. def openToLocalization (U) (p) (hp : p ∈ U) : OX(U) ⟶ R_p
7. [6] def stalkToFiberRingHom (p : Spec R) : OX_p ⟶ R_p
8. [5,7] def stalkIso (p : Spec R) : OX_p ≅ R_p
In the square brackets we list the dependencies of a construction on the previous steps.
-/
/-- The section of `structureSheaf R` on an open `U` sending each `x ∈ U` to the element
`f/g` in the localization of `R` at `x`. -/
def const (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
⟨fun x => IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, g, fun y => ⟨hu y y.2, IsLocalization.mk'_spec _ _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal) f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem const_apply' (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U)
(hx : g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hx⟩ :=
rfl
theorem exists_const (U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
∃ (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (_ : x ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U) (f g : R) (hg : _),
const R f g V hg = (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
let ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hfg⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hx⟩
⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, fun y hyV => (hfg ⟨y, hyV⟩).1,
Subtype.eq <| funext fun y => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| Eq.symm <| (hfg y).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem res_const (f g : R) (U hu V hv i) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map i (const R f g U hu) = const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem res_const' (f g : R) (V hv) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map (homOfLE hv).op (const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ => id) =
const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem const_zero (f : R) (U hu) : const R 0 f U hu = 0 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| by
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
exact (mul_eq_zero_of_left rfl ((algebraMap R (Localizations R x)) _)).symm
theorem const_self (f : R) (U hu) : const R f f U hu = 1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => IsLocalization.mk'_self _ _
theorem const_one (U) : (const R 1 1 U fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _) = 1 :=
const_self R 1 U _
theorem const_add (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ + const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * g₂ + f₂ * g₁) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx =>
Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_add _ _
⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_mul (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ * const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx => Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_mul _ f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_ext {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu₁ hu₂} (h : f₁ * g₂ = f₂ * g₁) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ = const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_of_eq (by rw [mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk, ← h, mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk])
theorem const_congr {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu} (hf : f₁ = f₂) (hg : g₁ = g₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu = const R f₂ g₂ U (hg ▸ hu) := by substs hf hg; rfl
theorem const_mul_rev (f g : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) : const R f g U hu₁ * const R g f U hu₂ = 1 := by
rw [const_mul, const_congr R rfl (mul_comm g f), const_self]
theorem const_mul_cancel (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g₁ U hu₁ * const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [const_mul, const_ext]; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem const_mul_cancel' (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ * const R f g₁ U hu₁ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [mul_comm, const_mul_cancel]
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as
a section of the structure sheaf. -/
def toOpen (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) :
CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun f :=
⟨fun _ => algebraMap R _ f, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, 1, fun y =>
⟨(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 y.1.2.1, by simp [RingHom.map_one, mul_one]⟩⟩⟩
map_one' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_one _
map_mul' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_mul _ _ _
map_zero' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_zero _
map_add' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_add _ _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_res (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op = toOpen R V :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_apply (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) (x : U) :
(toOpen R U f).1 x = algebraMap _ _ f :=
rfl
theorem toOpen_eq_const (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) :
toOpen R U f = const R f 1 U fun x _ => (Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 x.2.1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_one _ f
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as an element of
the stalk of `structureSheaf R` at `x`. -/
def toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
(toOpen R ⊤ ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ _ x (by trivial))
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_germ (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx = toStalk R x := by
rw [← toOpen_res R ⊤ U (homOfLE le_top : U ⟶ ⊤), Category.assoc, Presheaf.germ_res]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem germ_toOpen
(U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx (toOpen R U f) = toStalk R x f := by
rw [← toOpen_germ]; rfl
theorem toOpen_Γgerm_apply (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.Γgerm x (toOpen R ⊤ f) = toStalk R x f :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_to_basicOpen_self (f : R) : IsUnit (toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) f) :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (const R 1 f (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) fun _ => id) <| by
rw [toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_rev]
theorem isUnit_toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
IsUnit (toStalk R x (f : R)) := by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (f : R)) x f.2 (f : R)]
exact RingHom.isUnit_map _ (isUnit_to_basicOpen_self R f)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from the localization of `R` at `p` to the stalk
of the structure sheaf at the point `p`. -/
def localizationToStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
CommRingCat.ofHom <|
show Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal →+* _ from IsLocalization.lift (isUnit_toStalk R x)
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_of (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
localizationToStalk R x (algebraMap _ (Localization _) f) = toStalk R x f :=
IsLocalization.lift_eq (S := Localization x.asIdeal.primeCompl) _ f
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_mk' (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) (s : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
localizationToStalk R x (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) f s) =
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (s : R)) x s.2
(const R f s (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ => id) :=
(IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec (S := Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2,
← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2, ← RingHom.map_mul, toOpen_eq_const,
toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
/-- The ring homomorphism that takes a section of the structure sheaf of `R` on the open set `U`,
implemented as a subtype of dependent functions to localizations at prime ideals, and evaluates
the section on the point corresponding to a given prime ideal. -/
def openToLocalization (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) ⟶ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) :=
CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun s := (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_openToLocalization (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
(openToLocalization R U x hx :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) → Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) =
fun s => s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
theorem openToLocalization_apply (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
openToLocalization R U x hx s = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The ring homomorphism from the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point corresponding to
a prime ideal `p` to the localization of `R` at `p`,
formed by gluing the `openToLocalization` maps. -/
def stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ⟶ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) :=
Limits.colimit.desc ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ (structureSheaf R).1)
{ pt := _
ι := { app := fun U =>
openToLocalization R ((OpenNhds.inclusion _).obj (unop U)) x (unop U).2 } }
@[simp]
theorem germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom
(U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x =
openToLocalization R U x hx :=
Limits.colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[simp]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_germ (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx s) = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
RingHom.ext_iff.mp (CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom R U x hx)) s
@[simp]
theorem toStalk_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
toStalk R x ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x = CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _) := by
rw [toStalk, Category.assoc, germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x (toStalk R x f) = algebraMap _ _ f :=
RingHom.ext_iff.1 (CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (toStalk_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom R x)) _
/-- The ring isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point `p`
corresponding to a prime ideal in `R` and the localization of `R` at `p`. -/
@[simps]
def stalkIso (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ≅ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) where
hom := stalkToFiberRingHom R x
inv := localizationToStalk R x
hom_inv_id := by
apply stalk_hom_ext
intro U hxU
ext s
dsimp only [CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, CommRingCat.hom_id,
RingHom.coe_id, id_eq]
rw [stalkToFiberRingHom_germ]
obtain ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, (hg : V ≤ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen _), hs⟩ :=
exists_const _ _ s x hxU
have := res_apply R U V iVU s ⟨x, hxV⟩
dsimp only [isLocallyFraction_pred, Opens.apply_mk] at this
rw [← this, ← hs, const_apply, localizationToStalk_mk']
refine (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ_ext V hxV (homOfLE hg) iVU ?_
rw [← hs, res_const']
inv_hom_id := CommRingCat.hom_ext <|
@IsLocalization.ringHom_ext R _ x.asIdeal.primeCompl (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _
(Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _
(RingHom.comp (stalkToFiberRingHom R x).hom (localizationToStalk R x).hom)
(RingHom.id (Localization.AtPrime _)) <| by
ext f
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, localizationToStalk_of,
stalkToFiberRingHom_toStalk, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsIso (stalkToFiberRingHom R x) :=
(stalkIso R x).isIso_hom
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsLocalHom (stalkToFiberRingHom R x).hom :=
isLocalHom_of_isIso _
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsIso (localizationToStalk R x) :=
(stalkIso R x).isIso_inv
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsLocalHom (localizationToStalk R x).hom :=
isLocalHom_of_isIso _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_localizationToStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x ≫ localizationToStalk R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalkIso R x).hom_inv_id
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem localizationToStalk_stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
localizationToStalk R x ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalkIso R x).inv_hom_id
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting `s ∈ R_f` as a section of the structure sheaf
on the basic open defined by `f ∈ R`. -/
def toBasicOpen (f : R) :
Localization.Away f →+* (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op <| PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) :=
IsLocalization.Away.lift f (isUnit_to_basicOpen_self R f)
@[simp]
theorem toBasicOpen_mk' (s f : R) (g : Submonoid.powers s) :
toBasicOpen R s (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.Away s) f g) =
const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ hx => Submonoid.powers_le.2 hx g.2 :=
(IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [toOpen_eq_const, toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
@[simp]
theorem localization_toBasicOpen (f : R) :
RingHom.comp (toBasicOpen R f) (algebraMap R (Localization.Away f)) =
(toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)).hom :=
RingHom.ext fun g => by
rw [toBasicOpen, IsLocalization.Away.lift, RingHom.comp_apply, IsLocalization.lift_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toBasicOpen_to_map (s f : R) :
toBasicOpen R s (algebraMap R (Localization.Away s) f) =
const R f 1 (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _ :=
(IsLocalization.lift_eq _ _).trans <| toOpen_eq_const _ _ _
-- The proof here follows the argument in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Proposition II.2.2.
theorem toBasicOpen_injective (f : R) : Function.Injective (toBasicOpen R f) := by
intro s t h_eq
obtain ⟨a, ⟨b, hb⟩, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective (Submonoid.powers f) s
obtain ⟨c, ⟨d, hd⟩, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective (Submonoid.powers f) t
simp only [toBasicOpen_mk'] at h_eq
rw [IsLocalization.eq]
-- We know that the fractions `a/b` and `c/d` are equal as sections of the structure sheaf on
-- `basicOpen f`. We need to show that they agree as elements in the localization of `R` at `f`.
-- This amounts showing that `r * (d * a) = r * (b * c)`, for some power `r = f ^ n` of `f`.
-- We define `I` as the ideal of *all* elements `r` satisfying the above equation.
let I : Ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r : R | r * (d * a) = r * (b * c) }
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, zero_mul]
add_mem' := fun {r₁ r₂} hr₁ hr₂ => by dsimp at hr₁ hr₂ ⊢; simp only [add_mul, hr₁, hr₂]
smul_mem' := fun {r₁ r₂} hr₂ => by dsimp at hr₂ ⊢; simp only [mul_assoc, hr₂] }
-- Our claim now reduces to showing that `f` is contained in the radical of `I`
suffices f ∈ I.radical by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := this
exact ⟨⟨f ^ n, n, rfl⟩, hn⟩
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical, PrimeSpectrum.mem_vanishingIdeal]
intro p hfp
contrapose hfp
rw [PrimeSpectrum.mem_zeroLocus, Set.not_subset]
have := congr_fun (congr_arg Subtype.val h_eq) ⟨p, hfp⟩
dsimp at this
rw [IsLocalization.eq (S := Localization.AtPrime p.asIdeal)] at this
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := this
exact ⟨r.1, hr, r.2⟩
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `toBasicOpen`.
Every section can locally be represented on basic opens `basicOpen g` as a fraction `f/g`
-/
theorem locally_const_basicOpen (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : U) :
∃ (f g : R) (i : PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g ⟶ U), x.1 ∈ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g ∧
(const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ hy => hy) =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s := by
-- First, any section `s` can be represented as a fraction `f/g` on some open neighborhood of `x`
-- and we may pass to a `basicOpen h`, since these form a basis
obtain ⟨V, hxV : x.1 ∈ V.1, iVU, f, g, hVDg : V ≤ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g, s_eq⟩ :=
exists_const R U s x.1 x.2
obtain ⟨_, ⟨h, rfl⟩, hxDh, hDhV : PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen h ≤ V⟩ :=
PrimeSpectrum.isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.exists_subset_of_mem_open hxV V.2
-- The problem is of course, that `g` and `h` don't need to coincide.
-- But, since `basicOpen h ≤ basicOpen g`, some power of `h` must be a multiple of `g`
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_le_basicOpen_iff h g).mp (Set.Subset.trans hDhV hVDg)
-- Actually, we will need a *nonzero* power of `h`.
-- This is because we will need the equality `basicOpen (h ^ n) = basicOpen h`, which only
-- holds for a nonzero power `n`. We therefore artificially increase `n` by one.
replace hn := Ideal.mul_mem_right h (Ideal.span {g}) hn
rw [← pow_succ, Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at hn
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hn
have basic_opens_eq := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_pow h (n + 1) (by omega)
have i_basic_open := eqToHom basic_opens_eq ≫ homOfLE hDhV
-- We claim that `(f * c) / h ^ (n+1)` is our desired representation
use f * c, h ^ (n + 1), i_basic_open ≫ iVU, (basic_opens_eq.symm.le :) hxDh
rw [op_comp, Functor.map_comp, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← s_eq, res_const]
-- Note that the last rewrite here generated an additional goal, which was a parameter
-- of `res_const`. We prove this goal first
swap
· intro y hy
rw [basic_opens_eq] at hy
exact (Set.Subset.trans hDhV hVDg :) hy
-- All that is left is a simple calculation
apply const_ext
rw [mul_assoc f c g, hc]
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `toBasicOpen`.
A local representation of a section `s` as fractions `a i / h i` on finitely many basic opens
`basicOpen (h i)` can be "normalized" in such a way that `a i * h j = h i * a j` for all `i, j`
-/
theorem normalize_finite_fraction_representation (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) {ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (a h : ι → R)
(iDh : ∀ i : ι, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i) ⟶ U)
(h_cover : U ≤ ⨆ i ∈ t, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i))
(hs :
∀ i : ι,
(const R (a i) (h i) (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i)) fun _ hy => hy) =
(structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh i).op s) :
∃ (a' h' : ι → R) (iDh' : ∀ i : ι, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i) ⟶ U),
(U ≤ ⨆ i ∈ t, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i)) ∧
(∀ (i) (_ : i ∈ t) (j) (_ : j ∈ t), a' i * h' j = h' i * a' j) ∧
∀ i ∈ t,
(structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh' i).op s =
const R (a' i) (h' i) (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i)) fun _ hy => hy := by
-- First we show that the fractions `(a i * h j) / (h i * h j)` and `(h i * a j) / (h i * h j)`
-- coincide in the localization of `R` at `h i * h j`
have fractions_eq :
∀ i j : ι,
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.Away (h i * h j))
(a i * h j) ⟨h i * h j, Submonoid.mem_powers _⟩ =
IsLocalization.mk' _ (h i * a j) ⟨h i * h j, Submonoid.mem_powers _⟩ := by
intro i j
let D := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i * h j)
let iDi : D ⟶ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i) := homOfLE (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_left _ _)
let iDj : D ⟶ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h j) :=
homOfLE (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_right _ _)
-- Crucially, we need injectivity of `toBasicOpen`
apply toBasicOpen_injective R (h i * h j)
rw [toBasicOpen_mk', toBasicOpen_mk']
simp only []
-- Here, both sides of the equation are equal to a restriction of `s`
trans
on_goal 1 =>
convert congr_arg ((structureSheaf R).1.map iDj.op) (hs j).symm using 1
convert congr_arg ((structureSheaf R).1.map iDi.op) (hs i) using 1
all_goals rw [res_const]; apply const_ext; ring
-- The remaining two goals were generated during the rewrite of `res_const`
-- These can be solved immediately
exacts [PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_left _ _, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_right _ _]
-- From the equality in the localization, we obtain for each `(i,j)` some power `(h i * h j) ^ n`
-- which equalizes `a i * h j` and `h i * a j`
have exists_power :
∀ i j : ι, ∃ n : ℕ, a i * h j * (h i * h j) ^ n = h i * a j * (h i * h j) ^ n := by
intro i j
obtain ⟨⟨c, n, rfl⟩, hc⟩ := IsLocalization.eq.mp (fractions_eq i j)
use n + 1
rw [pow_succ]
dsimp at hc
convert hc using 1 <;> ring
let n := fun p : ι × ι => (exists_power p.1 p.2).choose
have n_spec := fun p : ι × ι => (exists_power p.fst p.snd).choose_spec
-- We need one power `(h i * h j) ^ N` that works for *all* pairs `(i,j)`
-- Since there are only finitely many indices involved, we can pick the supremum.
let N := (t ×ˢ t).sup n
have basic_opens_eq : ∀ i : ι, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i ^ (N + 1)) =
PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i) := fun i => PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_pow _ _ (by omega)
-- Expanding the fraction `a i / h i` by the power `(h i) ^ n` gives the desired normalization
refine
⟨fun i => a i * h i ^ N, fun i => h i ^ (N + 1), fun i => eqToHom (basic_opens_eq i) ≫ iDh i,
?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa only [basic_opens_eq] using h_cover
· intro i hi j hj
-- Here we need to show that our new fractions `a i / h i` satisfy the normalization condition
-- Of course, the power `N` we used to expand the fractions might be bigger than the power
-- `n (i, j)` which was originally chosen. We denote their difference by `k`
have n_le_N : n (i, j) ≤ N := Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_product.mpr ⟨hi, hj⟩)
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.le.dest n_le_N
simp only [← hk, pow_add, pow_one]
-- To accommodate for the difference `k`, we multiply both sides of the equation `n_spec (i, j)`
-- by `(h i * h j) ^ k`
convert congr_arg (fun z => z * (h i * h j) ^ k) (n_spec (i, j)) using 1 <;>
· simp only [n, mul_pow]; ring
-- Lastly, we need to show that the new fractions still represent our original `s`
intro i _
rw [op_comp, Functor.map_comp, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← hs, res_const]
-- additional goal spit out by `res_const`
swap
· exact (basic_opens_eq i).le
apply const_ext
dsimp
rw [pow_succ]
ring
-- Porting note: in the following proof there are two places where `⋃ i, ⋃ (hx : i ∈ _), ... `
-- though `hx` is not used in `...` part, it is still required to maintain the structure of
-- the original proof in mathlib3.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
-- The proof here follows the argument in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Proposition II.2.2.
theorem toBasicOpen_surjective (f : R) : Function.Surjective (toBasicOpen R f) := by
intro s
-- In this proof, `basicOpen f` will play two distinct roles: Firstly, it is an open set in the
-- prime spectrum. Secondly, it is used as an indexing type for various families of objects
-- (open sets, ring elements, ...). In order to make the distinction clear, we introduce a type
-- alias `ι` that is used whenever we want think of it as an indexing type.
let ι : Type u := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f
-- First, we pick some cover of basic opens, on which we can represent `s` as a fraction
choose a' h' iDh' hxDh' s_eq' using locally_const_basicOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) s
-- Since basic opens are compact, we can pass to a finite subcover
obtain ⟨t, ht_cover'⟩ :=
(PrimeSpectrum.isCompact_basicOpen f).elim_finite_subcover
(fun i : ι => PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i)) (fun i => PrimeSpectrum.isOpen_basicOpen)
-- Here, we need to show that our basic opens actually form a cover of `basicOpen f`
fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_iUnion]; exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hxDh' ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
simp only [← Opens.coe_iSup, SetLike.coe_subset_coe] at ht_cover'
-- We use the normalization lemma from above to obtain the relation `a i * h j = h i * a j`
obtain ⟨a, h, iDh, ht_cover, ah_ha, s_eq⟩ :=
normalize_finite_fraction_representation R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)
s t a' h' iDh' ht_cover' s_eq'
clear s_eq' iDh' hxDh' ht_cover' a' h'
simp only [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, Opens.coe_iSup] at ht_cover
replace ht_cover : (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f : Set <| PrimeSpectrum R) ⊆
⋃ (i : ι) (x : i ∈ t), (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i) : Set _) := ht_cover
-- Next we show that some power of `f` is a linear combination of the `h i`
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : f ∈ (Ideal.span (h '' ↑t)).radical := by
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical, PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_span]
simp [PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl] at ht_cover
replace ht_cover : (PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus {f})ᶜ ⊆
⋃ (i : ι) (x : i ∈ t), (PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus {h i})ᶜ := ht_cover
rw [Set.compl_subset_comm] at ht_cover
-- Why doesn't `simp_rw` do this?
simp_rw [Set.compl_iUnion, compl_compl, ← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iUnion,
← Finset.set_biUnion_coe, ← Set.image_eq_iUnion] at ht_cover
apply PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono ht_cover
exact PrimeSpectrum.subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus {f} (Set.mem_singleton f)
replace hn := Ideal.mul_mem_right f _ hn
rw [← pow_succ, Ideal.span, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination] at hn
rcases hn with ⟨b, b_supp, hb⟩
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply_of_mem_supported R b_supp] at hb
dsimp at hb
-- Finally, we have all the ingredients.
-- We claim that our preimage is given by `(∑ (i : ι) ∈ t, b i * a i) / f ^ (n+1)`
use
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.Away f) (∑ i ∈ t, b i * a i)
(⟨f ^ (n + 1), n + 1, rfl⟩ : Submonoid.powers _)
rw [toBasicOpen_mk']
-- Since the structure sheaf is a sheaf, we can show the desired equality locally.
-- Annoyingly, `Sheaf.eq_of_locally_eq'` requires an open cover indexed by a *type*, so we need to
-- coerce our finset `t` to a type first.
let tt := ((t : Set (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)) : Type u)
apply
(structureSheaf R).eq_of_locally_eq' (fun i : tt => PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i))
(PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) fun i : tt => iDh i
· -- This feels a little redundant, since already have `ht_cover` as a hypothesis
-- Unfortunately, `ht_cover` uses a bounded union over the set `t`, while here we have the
-- Union indexed by the type `tt`, so we need some boilerplate to translate one to the other
intro x hx
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, TopologicalSpace.Opens.mem_iSup]
have := ht_cover hx
rw [← Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Set.mem_iUnion₂] at this
rcases this with ⟨i, i_mem, x_mem⟩
exact ⟨⟨i, i_mem⟩, x_mem⟩
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
dsimp
change (structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh i).op _ = (structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh i).op _
rw [s_eq i hi, res_const]
-- Again, `res_const` spits out an additional goal
swap
· intro y hy
change y ∈ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (f ^ (n + 1))
rw [PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_pow f (n + 1) (by omega)]
exact (leOfHom (iDh i) :) hy
-- The rest of the proof is just computation
apply const_ext
rw [← hb, Finset.sum_mul, Finset.mul_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j hj
rw [mul_assoc, ah_ha j hj i hi]
ring
instance isIso_toBasicOpen (f : R) :
IsIso (CommRingCat.ofHom (toBasicOpen R f)) :=
haveI : IsIso ((forget CommRingCat).map (CommRingCat.ofHom (toBasicOpen R f))) :=
(isIso_iff_bijective _).mpr ⟨toBasicOpen_injective R f, toBasicOpen_surjective R f⟩
isIso_of_reflects_iso _ (forget CommRingCat)
/-- The ring isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basicOpen f` and the localization of `R`
at the submonoid of powers of `f`. -/
def basicOpenIso (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)) ≅
CommRingCat.of (Localization.Away f) :=
(asIso (CommRingCat.ofHom (toBasicOpen R f))).symm
instance stalkAlgebra (p : PrimeSpectrum R) : Algebra R ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) :=
(toStalk R p).hom.toAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem stalkAlgebra_map (p : PrimeSpectrum R) (r : R) :
algebraMap R ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) r = toStalk R p r :=
rfl
/-- Stalk of the structure sheaf at a prime p as localization of R -/
instance IsLocalization.to_stalk (p : PrimeSpectrum R) :
IsLocalization.AtPrime ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) p.asIdeal := by
convert (IsLocalization.isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (S := Localization.AtPrime p.asIdeal) _
(stalkIso R p).symm.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv).mp
Localization.isLocalization
apply Algebra.algebra_ext
intro
rw [stalkAlgebra_map]
congr 2
change toStalk R p = _ ≫ (stalkIso R p).inv
rw [Iso.eq_comp_inv]
exact toStalk_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom R p
instance openAlgebra (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵖ) : Algebra R ((structureSheaf R).val.obj U) :=
(toOpen R (unop U)).hom.toAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem openAlgebra_map (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵖ) (r : R) :
algebraMap R ((structureSheaf R).val.obj U) r = toOpen R (unop U) r :=
rfl
/-- Sections of the structure sheaf of Spec R on a basic open as localization of R -/
instance IsLocalization.to_basicOpen (r : R) :
IsLocalization.Away r ((structureSheaf R).val.obj (op <| PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r)) := by
convert (IsLocalization.isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (S := Localization.Away r) _
(basicOpenIso R r).symm.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv).mp
Localization.isLocalization
apply Algebra.algebra_ext
intro x
congr 1
exact (localization_toBasicOpen R r).symm
instance to_basicOpen_epi (r : R) : Epi (toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r)) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => CommRingCat.hom_ext (IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (Submonoid.powers r)
(CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp h))⟩
@[elementwise]
theorem to_global_factors :
toOpen R ⊤ =
CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R (Localization.Away (1 : R))) ≫
CommRingCat.ofHom (toBasicOpen R (1 : R)) ≫
(structureSheaf R).1.map (eqToHom PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_one.symm).op := by
rw [← Category.assoc]
change toOpen R ⊤ =
(CommRingCat.ofHom <| (toBasicOpen R 1).comp (algebraMap R (Localization.Away 1))) ≫
(structureSheaf R).1.map (eqToHom _).op
rw [localization_toBasicOpen R, CommRingCat.ofHom_hom, toOpen_res]
instance isIso_to_global : IsIso (toOpen R ⊤) := by
let hom := CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R (Localization.Away (1 : R)))
haveI : IsIso hom :=
(IsLocalization.atOne R (Localization.Away (1 : R))).toRingEquiv.toCommRingCatIso.isIso_hom
rw [to_global_factors R]
infer_instance
/-- The ring isomorphism between the ring `R` and the global sections `Γ(X, 𝒪ₓ)`. -/
@[simps! inv]
def globalSectionsIso : CommRingCat.of R ≅ (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op ⊤) :=
asIso (toOpen R ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem globalSectionsIso_hom (R : CommRingCat) : (globalSectionsIso R).hom = toOpen R ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise nosimp]
theorem toStalk_stalkSpecializes {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {x y : PrimeSpectrum R} (h : x ⤳ y) :
toStalk R y ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalkSpecializes h = toStalk R x := by
dsimp [toStalk]; simp [-toOpen_germ]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise nosimp]
theorem localizationToStalk_stalkSpecializes {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {x y : PrimeSpectrum R}
(h : x ⤳ y) :
StructureSheaf.localizationToStalk R y ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalkSpecializes h =
CommRingCat.ofHom (PrimeSpectrum.localizationMapOfSpecializes h) ≫
StructureSheaf.localizationToStalk R x := by
ext : 1
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (S := Localization.AtPrime y.asIdeal) y.asIdeal.primeCompl
rw [CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.comp_assoc, CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.comp_assoc]
dsimp [localizationToStalk, PrimeSpectrum.localizationMapOfSpecializes]
rw [IsLocalization.lift_comp, IsLocalization.lift_comp, IsLocalization.lift_comp]
exact CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (toStalk_stalkSpecializes h)
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise nosimp]
theorem stalkSpecializes_stalk_to_fiber {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {x y : PrimeSpectrum R}
(h : x ⤳ y) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalkSpecializes h ≫ StructureSheaf.stalkToFiberRingHom R x =
StructureSheaf.stalkToFiberRingHom R y ≫
(CommRingCat.ofHom (PrimeSpectrum.localizationMapOfSpecializes h)) := by
change _ ≫ (StructureSheaf.stalkIso R x).hom = (StructureSheaf.stalkIso R y).hom ≫ _
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv, Category.assoc, ← Iso.inv_comp_eq]
exact localizationToStalk_stalkSpecializes h
section Comap
variable {R} {S : Type u} [CommRing S] {P : Type u} [CommRing P]
/--
Given a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`, an open set `U` of the prime spectrum of `R` and an open
set `V` of the prime spectrum of `S`, such that `V ⊆ (comap f) ⁻¹' U`, we can push a section `s`
on `U` to a section on `V`, by composing with `Localization.localRingHom _ _ f` from the left and
`comap f` from the right. Explicitly, if `s` evaluates on `comap f p` to `a / b`, its image on `V`
evaluates on `p` to `f(a) / f(b)`.
At the moment, we work with arbitrary dependent functions `s : Π x : U, Localizations R x`. Below,
we prove the predicate `isLocallyFraction` is preserved by this map, hence it can be extended to
a morphism between the structure sheaves of `R` and `S`.
-/
def comapFun (f : R →+* S) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top S))
(hUV : V.1 ⊆ PrimeSpectrum.comap f ⁻¹' U.1) (s : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) (y : V) :
Localizations S y :=
Localization.localRingHom (PrimeSpectrum.comap f y.1).asIdeal _ f rfl
(s ⟨PrimeSpectrum.comap f y.1, hUV y.2⟩ :)
theorem comapFunIsLocallyFraction (f : R →+* S) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top S)) (hUV : V.1 ⊆ PrimeSpectrum.comap f ⁻¹' U.1)
(s : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) (hs : (isLocallyFraction R).toPrelocalPredicate.pred s) :
(isLocallyFraction S).toPrelocalPredicate.pred (comapFun f U V hUV s) := by
rintro ⟨p, hpV⟩
-- Since `s` is locally fraction, we can find a neighborhood `W` of `PrimeSpectrum.comap f p`
-- in `U`, such that `s = a / b` on `W`, for some ring elements `a, b : R`.
rcases hs ⟨PrimeSpectrum.comap f p, hUV hpV⟩ with ⟨W, m, iWU, a, b, h_frac⟩
-- We claim that we can write our new section as the fraction `f a / f b` on the neighborhood
-- `(comap f) ⁻¹ W ⊓ V` of `p`.
refine ⟨Opens.comap (PrimeSpectrum.comap f) W ⊓ V, ⟨m, hpV⟩, Opens.infLERight _ _, f a, f b, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨q, ⟨hqW, hqV⟩⟩
specialize h_frac ⟨PrimeSpectrum.comap f q, hqW⟩
refine ⟨h_frac.1, ?_⟩
dsimp only [comapFun]
erw [← Localization.localRingHom_to_map (PrimeSpectrum.comap f q).asIdeal, ← RingHom.map_mul,
h_frac.2, Localization.localRingHom_to_map]
rfl
/-- For a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` and open sets `U` and `V` of the prime spectra of `R` and
`S` such that `V ⊆ (comap f) ⁻¹ U`, the induced ring homomorphism from the structure sheaf of `R`
| at `U` to the structure sheaf of `S` at `V`.
Explicitly, this map is given as follows: For a point `p : V`, if the section `s` evaluates on `p`
to the fraction `a / b`, its image on `V` evaluates on `p` to the fraction `f(a) / f(b)`.
-/
def comap (f : R →+* S) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top S))
(hUV : V.1 ⊆ PrimeSpectrum.comap f ⁻¹' U.1) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) →+* (structureSheaf S).1.obj (op V) where
toFun s := ⟨comapFun f U V hUV s.1, comapFunIsLocallyFraction f U V hUV s.1 s.2⟩
map_one' :=
Subtype.ext <|
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/StructureSheaf.lean | 985 | 995 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.CubicDiscriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Weierstrass equations of elliptic curves
This file defines the structure of an elliptic curve as a nonsingular Weierstrass curve given by a
Weierstrass equation, which is mathematically accurate in many cases but also good for computation.
## Mathematical background
Let `S` be a scheme. The actual category of elliptic curves over `S` is a large category, whose
objects are schemes `E` equipped with a map `E → S`, a section `S → E`, and some axioms (the map is
smooth and proper and the fibres are geometrically-connected one-dimensional group varieties). In
the special case where `S` is the spectrum of some commutative ring `R` whose Picard group is zero
(this includes all fields, all PIDs, and many other commutative rings) it can be shown (using a lot
of algebro-geometric machinery) that every elliptic curve `E` is a projective plane cubic isomorphic
to a Weierstrass curve given by the equation `Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y = X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆` for some `aᵢ`
in `R`, and such that a certain quantity called the discriminant of `E` is a unit in `R`. If `R` is
a field, this quantity divides the discriminant of a cubic polynomial whose roots over a splitting
field of `R` are precisely the `X`-coordinates of the non-zero 2-torsion points of `E`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve`: a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Δ`: the discriminant of a Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.map`: the Weierstrass curve mapped over a ring homomorphism.
* `WeierstrassCurve.twoTorsionPolynomial`: the 2-torsion polynomial of a Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.IsElliptic`: typeclass asserting that a Weierstrass curve is an elliptic curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.j`: the j-invariant of an elliptic curve.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.twoTorsionPolynomial_disc`: the discriminant of a Weierstrass curve is a
constant factor of the cubic discriminant of its 2-torsion polynomial.
## Implementation notes
The definition of elliptic curves in this file makes sense for all commutative rings `R`, but it
only gives a type which can be beefed up to a category which is equivalent to the category of
elliptic curves over the spectrum `Spec(R)` of `R` in the case that `R` has trivial Picard group
`Pic(R)` or, slightly more generally, when its 12-torsion is trivial. The issue is that for a
general ring `R`, there might be elliptic curves over `Spec(R)` in the sense of algebraic geometry
which are not globally defined by a cubic equation valid over the entire base.
## References
* [N Katz and B Mazur, *Arithmetic Moduli of Elliptic Curves*][katz_mazur]
* [P Deligne, *Courbes Elliptiques: Formulaire (d'après J. Tate)*][deligne_formulaire]
* [J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, weierstrass equation, j invariant
-/
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow])
universe s u v w
/-! ## Weierstrass curves -/
/-- A Weierstrass curve `Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y = X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆` with parameters `aᵢ`. -/
@[ext]
structure WeierstrassCurve (R : Type u) where
/-- The `a₁` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₁ : R
/-- The `a₂` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₂ : R
/-- The `a₃` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₃ : R
/-- The `a₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₄ : R
/-- The `a₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₆ : R
namespace WeierstrassCurve
instance {R : Type u} [Inhabited R] : Inhabited <| WeierstrassCurve R :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Quantity
/-! ### Standard quantities -/
/-- The `b₂` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₂ : R :=
W.a₁ ^ 2 + 4 * W.a₂
/-- The `b₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₄ : R :=
2 * W.a₄ + W.a₁ * W.a₃
/-- The `b₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₆ : R :=
W.a₃ ^ 2 + 4 * W.a₆
/-- The `b₈` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₈ : R :=
W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + 4 * W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 - W.a₄ ^ 2
lemma b_relation : 4 * W.b₈ = W.b₂ * W.b₆ - W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈]
ring1
/-- The `c₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def c₄ : R :=
W.b₂ ^ 2 - 24 * W.b₄
/-- The `c₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def c₆ : R :=
-W.b₂ ^ 3 + 36 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ - 216 * W.b₆
/-- The discriminant `Δ` of a Weierstrass curve. If `R` is a field, then this polynomial vanishes
if and only if the cubic curve cut out by this equation is singular. Sometimes only defined up to
sign in the literature; we choose the sign used by the LMFDB. For more discussion, see
[the LMFDB page on discriminants](https://www.lmfdb.org/knowledge/show/ec.discriminant). -/
def Δ : R :=
-W.b₂ ^ 2 * W.b₈ - 8 * W.b₄ ^ 3 - 27 * W.b₆ ^ 2 + 9 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ * W.b₆
lemma c_relation : 1728 * W.Δ = W.c₄ ^ 3 - W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈, c₄, c₆, Δ]
ring1
section CharTwo
variable [CharP R 2]
lemma b₂_of_char_two : W.b₂ = W.a₁ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₂]
linear_combination 2 * W.a₂ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₄_of_char_two : W.b₄ = W.a₁ * W.a₃ := by
rw [b₄]
linear_combination W.a₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₆_of_char_two : W.b₆ = W.a₃ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₆]
linear_combination 2 * W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₈_of_char_two :
W.b₈ = W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 + W.a₄ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₈]
linear_combination (2 * W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ - W.a₄ ^ 2) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c₄_of_char_two : W.c₄ = W.a₁ ^ 4 := by
rw [c₄, b₂_of_char_two]
linear_combination -12 * W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c₆_of_char_two : W.c₆ = W.a₁ ^ 6 := by
rw [c₆, b₂_of_char_two]
linear_combination (18 * W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.b₄ - 108 * W.b₆ - W.a₁ ^ 6) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma Δ_of_char_two : W.Δ = W.a₁ ^ 4 * W.b₈ + W.a₃ ^ 4 + W.a₁ ^ 3 * W.a₃ ^ 3 := by
rw [Δ, b₂_of_char_two, b₄_of_char_two, b₆_of_char_two]
linear_combination (-W.a₁ ^ 4 * W.b₈ - 14 * W.a₃ ^ 4) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b_relation_of_char_two : W.b₂ * W.b₆ = W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.b_relation + 2 * W.b₈ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c_relation_of_char_two : W.c₄ ^ 3 = W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.c_relation + 864 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
end CharTwo
section CharThree
variable [CharP R 3]
lemma b₂_of_char_three : W.b₂ = W.a₁ ^ 2 + W.a₂ := by
rw [b₂]
linear_combination W.a₂ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₄_of_char_three : W.b₄ = -W.a₄ + W.a₁ * W.a₃ := by
rw [b₄]
linear_combination W.a₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₆_of_char_three : W.b₆ = W.a₃ ^ 2 + W.a₆ := by
rw [b₆]
linear_combination W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₈_of_char_three :
W.b₈ = W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 - W.a₄ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₈]
linear_combination W.a₂ * W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c₄_of_char_three : W.c₄ = W.b₂ ^ 2 := by
rw [c₄]
linear_combination -8 * W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c₆_of_char_three : W.c₆ = -W.b₂ ^ 3 := by
rw [c₆]
linear_combination (12 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ - 72 * W.b₆) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma Δ_of_char_three : W.Δ = -W.b₂ ^ 2 * W.b₈ - 8 * W.b₄ ^ 3 := by
rw [Δ]
linear_combination (-9 * W.b₆ ^ 2 + 3 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ * W.b₆) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b_relation_of_char_three : W.b₈ = W.b₂ * W.b₆ - W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination W.b_relation - W.b₈ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c_relation_of_char_three : W.c₄ ^ 3 = W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.c_relation + 576 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
end CharThree
end Quantity
section BaseChange
/-! ### Maps and base changes -/
variable {A : Type v} [CommRing A] (f : R →+* A)
/-- The Weierstrass curve mapped over a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* A`. -/
@[simps]
def map : WeierstrassCurve A :=
⟨f W.a₁, f W.a₂, f W.a₃, f W.a₄, f W.a₆⟩
variable (A) in
/-- The Weierstrass curve base changed to an algebra `A` over `R`. -/
abbrev baseChange [Algebra R A] : WeierstrassCurve A :=
W.map <| algebraMap R A
@[simp]
lemma map_b₂ : (W.map f).b₂ = f W.b₂ := by
simp only [b₂, map_a₁, map_a₂]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₄ : (W.map f).b₄ = f W.b₄ := by
simp only [b₄, map_a₁, map_a₃, map_a₄]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₆ : (W.map f).b₆ = f W.b₆ := by
simp only [b₆, map_a₃, map_a₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₈ : (W.map f).b₈ = f W.b₈ := by
simp only [b₈, map_a₁, map_a₂, map_a₃, map_a₄, map_a₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_c₄ : (W.map f).c₄ = f W.c₄ := by
simp only [c₄, map_b₂, map_b₄]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_c₆ : (W.map f).c₆ = f W.c₆ := by
simp only [c₆, map_b₂, map_b₄, map_b₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_Δ : (W.map f).Δ = f W.Δ := by
simp only [Δ, map_b₂, map_b₄, map_b₆, map_b₈]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_id : W.map (RingHom.id R) = W :=
rfl
lemma map_map {B : Type w} [CommRing B] (g : A →+* B) : (W.map f).map g = W.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_baseChange {S : Type s} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {B : Type w} [CommRing B] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B]
[IsScalarTower R S B] (g : A →ₐ[S] B) : (W.baseChange A).map g = W.baseChange B :=
congr_arg W.map <| g.comp_algebraMap_of_tower R
lemma map_injective {f : R →+* A} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective <| map (f := f) := fun _ _ h => by
rcases mk.inj h with ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩
ext <;> apply_fun _ using hf <;> assumption
end BaseChange
section TorsionPolynomial
/-! ### 2-torsion polynomials -/
/-- A cubic polynomial whose discriminant is a multiple of the Weierstrass curve discriminant. If
`W` is an elliptic curve over a field `R` of characteristic different from 2, then its roots over a
splitting field of `R` are precisely the `X`-coordinates of the non-zero 2-torsion points of `W`. -/
def twoTorsionPolynomial : Cubic R :=
⟨4, W.b₂, 2 * W.b₄, W.b₆⟩
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_disc : W.twoTorsionPolynomial.disc = 16 * W.Δ := by
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈, Δ, twoTorsionPolynomial, Cubic.disc]
ring1
section CharTwo
variable [CharP R 2]
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_of_char_two : W.twoTorsionPolynomial = ⟨0, W.b₂, 0, W.b₆⟩ := by
rw [twoTorsionPolynomial]
ext <;> dsimp
· linear_combination 2 * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
· linear_combination W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_disc_of_char_two : W.twoTorsionPolynomial.disc = 0 := by
linear_combination W.twoTorsionPolynomial_disc + 8 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
end CharTwo
section CharThree
variable [CharP R 3]
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_of_char_three : W.twoTorsionPolynomial = ⟨1, W.b₂, -W.b₄, W.b₆⟩ := by
rw [twoTorsionPolynomial]
ext <;> dsimp
· linear_combination CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
· linear_combination W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_disc_of_char_three : W.twoTorsionPolynomial.disc = W.Δ := by
linear_combination W.twoTorsionPolynomial_disc + 5 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
end CharThree
-- TODO: change to `[IsUnit ...]` once #17458 is merged
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_disc_isUnit (hu : IsUnit (2 : R)) :
IsUnit W.twoTorsionPolynomial.disc ↔ IsUnit W.Δ := by
rw [twoTorsionPolynomial_disc, IsUnit.mul_iff, show (16 : R) = 2 ^ 4 by norm_num1]
exact and_iff_right <| hu.pow 4
-- TODO: change to `[IsUnit ...]` once #17458 is merged
-- TODO: In this case `IsUnit W.Δ` is just `W.IsElliptic`, consider removing/rephrasing this result
lemma twoTorsionPolynomial_disc_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hu : IsUnit (2 : R)) (hΔ : IsUnit W.Δ) :
W.twoTorsionPolynomial.disc ≠ 0 :=
((W.twoTorsionPolynomial_disc_isUnit hu).mpr hΔ).ne_zero
end TorsionPolynomial
/-! ## Elliptic curves -/
-- TODO: change to `protected abbrev IsElliptic := IsUnit W.Δ` once #17458 is merged
/-- `WeierstrassCurve.IsElliptic` is a typeclass which asserts that a Weierstrass curve is an
elliptic curve: that its discriminant is a unit. Note that this definition is only mathematically
accurate for certain rings whose Picard group has trivial 12-torsion, such as a field or a PID. -/
@[mk_iff]
protected class IsElliptic : Prop where
isUnit : IsUnit W.Δ
variable [W.IsElliptic]
lemma isUnit_Δ : IsUnit W.Δ := IsElliptic.isUnit
/-- The discriminant `Δ'` of an elliptic curve over `R`, which is given as a unit in `R`.
Note that to prove two equal elliptic curves have the same `Δ'`, you need to use `simp_rw`,
as `rw` cannot transfer instance `WeierstrassCurve.IsElliptic` automatically. -/
noncomputable def Δ' : Rˣ :=
W.isUnit_Δ.unit
/-- The discriminant `Δ'` of an elliptic curve is equal to the
discriminant `Δ` of it as a Weierstrass curve. -/
@[simp]
lemma coe_Δ' : W.Δ' = W.Δ :=
rfl
/-- The j-invariant `j` of an elliptic curve, which is invariant under isomorphisms over `R`.
Note that to prove two equal elliptic curves have the same `j`, you need to use `simp_rw`,
as `rw` cannot transfer instance `WeierstrassCurve.IsElliptic` automatically. -/
| noncomputable def j : R :=
W.Δ'⁻¹ * W.c₄ ^ 3
/-- A variant of `WeierstrassCurve.j_eq_zero_iff` without assuming a reduced ring. -/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Weierstrass.lean | 378 | 381 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,743 | 1,747 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DeleteEdges
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
/-!
# Subgraphs of a simple graph
A subgraph of a simple graph consists of subsets of the graph's vertices and edges such that the
endpoints of each edge are present in the vertex subset. The edge subset is formalized as a
sub-relation of the adjacency relation of the simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `Subgraph G` is the type of subgraphs of a `G : SimpleGraph V`.
* `Subgraph.neighborSet`, `Subgraph.incidenceSet`, and `Subgraph.degree` are like their
`SimpleGraph` counterparts, but they refer to vertices from `G` to avoid subtype coercions.
* `Subgraph.coe` is the coercion from a `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`.
(In Lean 3 this could not be a `Coe` instance since the destination type depends on `G'`.)
* `Subgraph.IsSpanning` for whether a subgraph is a spanning subgraph and
`Subgraph.IsInduced` for whether a subgraph is an induced subgraph.
* Instances for `Lattice (Subgraph G)` and `BoundedOrder (Subgraph G)`.
* `SimpleGraph.toSubgraph`: If a `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another, then you can turn it
into a member of the larger graph's `SimpleGraph.Subgraph` type.
* Graph homomorphisms from a subgraph to a graph (`Subgraph.map_top`) and between subgraphs
(`Subgraph.map`).
## Implementation notes
* Recall that subgraphs are not determined by their vertex sets, so `SetLike` does not apply to
this kind of subobject.
## TODO
* Images of graph homomorphisms as subgraphs.
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- A subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` is a subset of vertices along with a restriction of the adjacency
relation that is symmetric and is supported by the vertex subset. They also form a bounded lattice.
Thinking of `V → V → Prop` as `Set (V × V)`, a set of darts (i.e., half-edges), then
`Subgraph.adj_sub` is that the darts of a subgraph are a subset of the darts of `G`. -/
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
/-- Vertices of the subgraph -/
verts : Set V
/-- Edges of the subgraph -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
/-- The one-vertex subgraph. -/
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
/-- The one-edge subgraph. -/
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {H : G.Subgraph} {u v w x : V} (h2 : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) :
H.Adj u v ↔ H.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h2
rcases h2 with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, Subgraph.adj_comm]
/-- Coercion from `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`. -/
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
instance (G : SimpleGraph V) (H : Subgraph G) [DecidableRel H.Adj] : DecidableRel H.coe.Adj :=
fun a b ↦ ‹DecidableRel H.Adj› _ _
/-- A subgraph is called a *spanning subgraph* if it contains all the vertices of `G`. -/
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
protected alias ⟨IsSpanning.verts_eq_univ, _⟩ := isSpanning_iff
/-- Coercion from `Subgraph G` to `SimpleGraph V`. If `G'` is a spanning
subgraph, then `G'.spanningCoe` yields an isomorphic graph.
In general, this adds in all vertices from `V` as isolated vertices. -/
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
lemma spanningCoe_le (G' : G.Subgraph) : G'.spanningCoe ≤ G := fun _ _ ↦ G'.3
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
lemma mem_of_adj_spanningCoe {v w : V} {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s)
(hadj : G.spanningCoe.Adj v w) : v ∈ s := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma spanningCoe_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hadj : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hadj).spanningCoe = fromEdgeSet {s(v, w)} := by
ext v w
aesop
/-- `spanningCoe` is equivalent to `coe` for a subgraph that `IsSpanning`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph is called an *induced subgraph* if vertices of `G'` are adjacent if
they are adjacent in `G`. -/
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ G'.verts → ∀ ⦃w⦄, w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
@[simp] protected lemma IsInduced.adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (hG' : G'.IsInduced) {a b : G'.verts} :
G'.Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
⟨coe_adj_sub _ _ _, hG' a.2 b.2⟩
/-- `H.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in the subgraph `H`. -/
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
/-- `G'.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G'`. -/
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph as a graph has equivalent neighbor sets. -/
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The edge set of `G'` consists of a subset of edges of `G`. -/
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := .rfl
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_coe {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.edgeSet = Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' G'.edgeSet := by
ext e; induction e using Sym2.ind; simp
lemma image_coe_edgeSet_coe (G' : G.Subgraph) : Sym2.map (↑) '' G'.coe.edgeSet = G'.edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_coe, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
rintro e he
induction e using Sym2.ind with | h a b =>
rw [Subgraph.mem_edgeSet] at he
exact ⟨s(⟨a, edge_vert _ he⟩, ⟨b, edge_vert _ he.symm⟩), Sym2.map_pair_eq ..⟩
theorem mem_verts_of_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
induction e
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
/-- The `incidenceSet` is the set of edges incident to a given vertex. -/
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
/-- Give a vertex as an element of the subgraph's vertex type. -/
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
/--
Create an equal copy of a subgraph (see `copy_eq`) with possibly different definitional equalities.
See Note [range copy pattern].
-/
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext hV hadj
/-- The union of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Max G.Subgraph where
max G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The intersection of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Min G.Subgraph where
min G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The `top` subgraph is `G` as a subgraph of itself. -/
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
/-- The `bot` subgraph is the subgraph with no vertices or edges. -/
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem verts_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).verts = ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sInf s).verts = ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_iSup {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).verts = ⋃ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem verts_iInf {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).verts = ⋂ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iInf]
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).coe = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma IsInduced.top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).IsInduced := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ id
/-- The graph isomorphism between the top element of `G.subgraph` and `G`. -/
def topIso : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).coe ≃g G where
toFun := (↑)
invFun a := ⟨a, Set.mem_univ _⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eta ..
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := .rfl
theorem verts_spanningCoe_injective :
(fun G' : Subgraph G => (G'.verts, G'.spanningCoe)).Injective := by
intro G₁ G₂ h
rw [Prod.ext_iff] at h
exact Subgraph.ext h.1 (spanningCoe_inj.1 h.2)
/-- For subgraphs `G₁`, `G₂`, `G₁ ≤ G₂` iff `G₁.verts ⊆ G₂.verts` and
`∀ a b, G₁.adj a b → G₂.adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ show DistribLattice G.Subgraph from
verts_spanningCoe_injective.distribLattice _
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun x y => x.verts ⊆ y.verts ∧ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w }
instance : BoundedOrder (Subgraph G) where
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top x := ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => x.adj_sub⟩
bot_le _ := ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- Note that subgraphs do not form a Boolean algebra, because of `verts`. -/
def completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms : CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms G.Subgraph :=
{ Subgraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top := fun G' => ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => G'.adj_sub⟩
bot_le := fun _ => ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
sSup := sSup
-- Porting note: needed `apply` here to modify elaboration; previously the term itself was fine.
le_sSup := fun s G' hG' => ⟨by apply Set.subset_iUnion₂ G' hG', fun _ _ hab => ⟨G', hG', hab⟩⟩
sSup_le := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, by
rintro a b ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact (hG' _ hH).2 hab⟩
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun _ G' hG' => ⟨Set.iInter₂_subset G' hG', fun _ _ hab => hab.1 hG'⟩
le_sInf := fun _ G' hG' =>
⟨Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, fun _ _ hab =>
⟨fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).2 hab, G'.adj_sub hab⟩⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => Subgraph.ext (by simpa using iInf_iSup_eq)
(by ext; simp [Classical.skolem]) }
instance : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
.ofMinimalAxioms completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms
@[gcongr] lemma verts_mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (h : H ≤ H') : H.verts ⊆ H'.verts := h.1
lemma verts_monotone : Monotone (verts : G.Subgraph → Set V) := fun _ _ h ↦ h.1
@[simps]
instance subgraphInhabited : Inhabited (Subgraph G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sup {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊔ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∪ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_inf {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊓ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∩ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_top (v : V) : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_bot (v : V) : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sSup s).neighborSet v = ⋃ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sInf s).neighborSet v = (⋂ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨆ i, f i).neighborSet v = ⋃ i, (f i).neighborSet v := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨅ i, f i).neighborSet v = (⋂ i, (f i).neighborSet v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = G.edgeSet := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊓ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∩ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∪ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).edgeSet = ⋃ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G' := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) :
(sInf s).edgeSet = (⋂ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G') ∩ G.edgeSet := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨆ i, f i).edgeSet = ⋃ i, (f i).edgeSet := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨅ i, f i).edgeSet = (⋂ i, (f i).edgeSet) ∩ G.edgeSet := by
simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = ⊥ := rfl
/-- Turn a subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` into a member of its subgraph type. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) : G.Subgraph where
verts := Set.univ
Adj := H.Adj
adj_sub e := h e
edge_vert _ := Set.mem_univ _
symm := H.symm
theorem support_mono {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.support ⊆ H'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h.2
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) :
(toSubgraph H h).IsSpanning :=
Set.mem_univ
theorem spanningCoe_le_of_le {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.spanningCoe ≤ H'.spanningCoe :=
h.2
@[simp]
lemma sup_spanningCoe (H H' : Subgraph G) :
(H ⊔ H').spanningCoe = H.spanningCoe ⊔ H'.spanningCoe := rfl
/-- The top of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the graph itself. -/
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g G where
toFun v := ↑v
invFun v := ⟨v, trivial⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- The bottom of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the empty graph on the empty
vertex type. -/
def botEquiv : (⊥ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g (⊥ : SimpleGraph Empty) where
toFun v := v.property.elim
invFun v := v.elim
left_inv := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.elim
right_inv v := v.elim
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
theorem edgeSet_mono {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.edgeSet ≤ H₂.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind h.2
theorem _root_.Disjoint.edgeSet {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Disjoint H₁.edgeSet H₂.edgeSet :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by simpa using edgeSet_mono h.le_bot
section map
variable {G' : SimpleGraph W} {f : G →g G'}
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a covariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) : G'.Subgraph where
verts := f '' H.verts
Adj := Relation.Map H.Adj f f
adj_sub := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact f.map_rel (H.adj_sub h)
edge_vert := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (H.edge_vert h)
symm := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨v, u, H.symm h, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id (H : G.Subgraph) : H.map Hom.id = H := by ext <;> simp
lemma map_comp {U : Type*} {G'' : SimpleGraph U} (H : G.Subgraph) (f : G →g G') (g : G' →g G'') :
H.map (g.comp f) = (H.map f).map g := by ext <;> simp [Subgraph.map]
@[gcongr] lemma map_mono {H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph} (hH : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.map f ≤ H₂.map f := by
constructor
· intro
simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro v hv rfl
exact ⟨_, hH.1 hv, rfl⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, hH.2 ha, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_monotone : Monotone (Subgraph.map f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_mono
theorem map_sup (f : G →g G') (H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph) : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).map f = H₁.map f ⊔ H₂.map f := by
ext <;> simp [Set.image_union, map_adj, sup_adj, Relation.Map, or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp] lemma map_iso_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (e : G ≃g H) : Subgraph.map e.toHom ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp [Relation.Map, e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, ← e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) :
(H.map f).edgeSet = Sym2.map f '' H.edgeSet := Sym2.fromRel_relationMap ..
end map
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a contravariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G'.Subgraph) : G.Subgraph where
verts := f ⁻¹' H.verts
Adj u v := G.Adj u v ∧ H.Adj (f u) (f v)
adj_sub h := h.1
edge_vert h := Set.mem_preimage.1 (H.edge_vert h.2)
symm _ _ h := ⟨G.symm h.1, H.symm h.2⟩
theorem comap_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.comap f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
apply h.1
· intro v w
simp +contextual only [comap_adj, and_imp, true_and]
intro
apply h.2
@[simp] lemma comap_equiv_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g H) : Subgraph.comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [f.map_adj]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) (H' : G'.Subgraph) :
H.map f ≤ H' ↔ H ≤ H'.comap f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun v hv ↦ ?_, fun v w hvw ↦ ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨fun v ↦ ?_, fun v w ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
exact h.1 ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
· simp only [H.adj_sub hvw, comap_adj, true_and]
exact h.2 ⟨v, w, hvw, rfl, rfl⟩
· simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro w hw rfl
exact h.1 hw
· simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro u u' hu rfl rfl
exact (h.2 hu).2
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.Subgraph := by
refine .ofBijective
(α := {H : Finset V × (V → V → Bool) //
(∀ a b, H.2 a b → G.Adj a b) ∧ (∀ a b, H.2 a b → a ∈ H.1) ∧ ∀ a b, H.2 a b = H.2 b a})
(fun H ↦ ⟨H.1.1, fun a b ↦ H.1.2 a b, @H.2.1, @H.2.2.1, by simp [Symmetric, H.2.2.2]⟩)
⟨?_, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩
simp [funext_iff]
· classical
exact ⟨⟨(H.verts.toFinset, fun a b ↦ H.Adj a b), fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.adj_sub,
fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.edge_vert, by simp [H.adj_comm]⟩, by simp⟩
instance [Finite V] : Finite G.Subgraph := by classical cases nonempty_fintype V; infer_instance
/-- Given two subgraphs, one a subgraph of the other, there is an induced injective homomorphism of
the subgraphs as graphs. -/
@[simps]
def inclusion {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : x.coe →g y.coe where
toFun v := ⟨↑v, And.left h v.property⟩
map_rel' hvw := h.2 hvw
theorem inclusion.injective {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := by
intro v w h
rw [inclusion, DFunLike.coe, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at h
exact Subtype.ext h
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` into `G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def hom (x : Subgraph G) : x.coe →g G where
toFun v := v
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
@[simp] lemma coe_hom (x : Subgraph G) :
(x.hom : x.verts → V) = (fun (v : x.verts) => (v : V)) := rfl
theorem hom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.hom :=
fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.ext
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias hom.injective := hom_injective
@[simp] lemma map_hom_top (G' : G.Subgraph) : Subgraph.map G'.hom ⊤ = G' := by
aesop (add unfold safe Relation.Map, unsafe G'.edge_vert, unsafe Adj.symm)
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` as
a spanning subgraph into `G`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningHom (x : Subgraph G) : x.spanningCoe →g G where
toFun := id
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
theorem spanningHom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.spanningHom :=
fun _ _ ↦ id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias spanningHom.injective := spanningHom_injective
theorem neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) (v : V) :
x.neighborSet v ⊆ y.neighborSet v :=
fun _ h' ↦ h.2 h'
instance neighborSet.decidablePred (G' : Subgraph G) [h : DecidableRel G'.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v) :=
h v
/-- If a graph is locally finite at a vertex, then so is a subgraph of that graph. -/
instance finiteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [DecidableRel G'.Adj]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G.neighborSet v) (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
/-- If a subgraph is locally finite at a vertex, then so are subgraphs of that subgraph.
This is not an instance because `G''` cannot be inferred. -/
def finiteAtOfSubgraph {G' G'' : Subgraph G} [DecidableRel G'.Adj] (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : G'.verts)
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G''.neighborSet v) (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
instance (G' : Subgraph G) [Fintype G'.verts] (v : V) [DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset G'.verts (neighborSet_subset_verts G' v)
instance coeFiniteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (coeNeighborSetEquiv v).symm
theorem IsSpanning.card_verts [Fintype V] {G' : Subgraph G} [Fintype G'.verts] (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.verts.toFinset.card = Fintype.card V := by
simp only [isSpanning_iff.1 h, Set.toFinset_univ]
congr
/-- The degree of a vertex in a subgraph. It's zero for vertices outside the subgraph. -/
def degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : ℕ :=
Fintype.card (G'.neighborSet v)
theorem finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
(G'.neighborSet v).toFinset.card = G'.degree v := by
rw [degree, Set.toFinset_card]
theorem degree_le (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
theorem degree_le' (G' G'' : Subgraph G) (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G''.degree v :=
Set.card_le_card (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
@[simp]
theorem coe_degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : G'.coe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Fintype.card_congr (coeNeighborSetEquiv v)
@[simp]
theorem degree_spanningCoe {G' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.spanningCoe.neighborSet v)] : G'.spanningCoe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Subgraph.degree]
congr!
theorem degree_eq_one_iff_unique_adj {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
G'.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃! w : V, G'.Adj v w := by
rw [← finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Finset.card_eq_one, Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem]
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, mem_neighborSet]
lemma neighborSet_eq_of_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
H.neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := by
lift H.neighborSet v to Finset V using h.set_finite_iff.mp hfin with s hs
lift G.neighborSet v to Finset V using hfin with t ht
refine congrArg _ <| Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le ?_ (Finset.card_eq_of_equiv h).le
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, hs, ht]
exact H.neighborSet_subset _
lemma adj_iff_of_neighborSet_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
∀ {w}, H.Adj v w ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (neighborSet_eq_of_equiv h hfin) _
end Subgraph
section MkProperties
/-! ### Properties of `singletonSubgraph` and `subgraphOfAdj` -/
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph W}
instance nonempty_singletonSubgraph_verts (v : V) : Nonempty (G.singletonSubgraph v).verts :=
⟨⟨v, Set.mem_singleton v⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singletonSubgraph_le_iff (v : V) (H : G.Subgraph) :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ H ↔ v ∈ H.verts := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.1 (Set.mem_singleton v), ?_⟩
intro h
constructor
· rwa [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
· exact fun _ _ ↦ False.elim
@[simp]
theorem map_singletonSubgraph (f : G →g G') {v : V} :
Subgraph.map f (G.singletonSubgraph v) = G'.singletonSubgraph (f v) := by
ext <;> simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply,
exists_and_left, and_iff_left_iff_imp, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Subgraph.map_verts,
singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.image_singleton]
exact False.elim
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_singletonSubgraph (v w : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).neighborSet w = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_singletonSubgraph (v : V) : (G.singletonSubgraph v).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
theorem eq_singletonSubgraph_iff_verts_eq (H : G.Subgraph) {v : V} :
H = G.singletonSubgraph v ↔ H.verts = {v} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts], fun h ↦ ?_⟩
ext
· rw [h, singletonSubgraph_verts]
· simp only [Prop.bot_eq_false, singletonSubgraph_adj, Pi.bot_apply, iff_false]
intro ha
have ha1 := ha.fst_mem
have ha2 := ha.snd_mem
rw [h, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha1 ha2
subst_vars
exact ha.ne rfl
instance nonempty_subgraphOfAdj_verts {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Nonempty (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).verts :=
⟨⟨v, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).edgeSet = {s(v, w)} := by
ext e
refine e.ind ?_
simp only [eq_comm, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Subgraph.mem_edgeSet, subgraphOfAdj_adj,
forall₂_true_iff]
lemma subgraphOfAdj_le_of_adj {v w : V} (H : G.Subgraph) (h : H.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj (H.adj_sub h) ≤ H := by
constructor
· intro x
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
· simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
rintro _ _ (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩) <;> simp [h, h.symm]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_symm {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm = G.subgraphOfAdj hvw := by
ext <;> simp [or_comm, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem map_subgraphOfAdj (f : G →g G') {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
Subgraph.map f (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw) = G'.subgraphOfAdj (f.map_adj hvw) := by
ext
· simp only [Subgraph.map_verts, subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_insert_iff,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl | rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· use v
simp
· use w
simp
· simp only [Relation.Map, Subgraph.map_adj, subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl, rfl⟩ <;> simp
· rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· use v, w
simp
· use w, v
simp
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_subset {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u ⊆ {v, w} :=
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet_subset_verts _
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet v = {w} := by
ext u
suffices w = u ↔ u = w by simpa [hvw.ne.symm] using this
rw [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_snd_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet w = {v} := by
rw [subgraphOfAdj_symm hvw.symm]
exact neighborSet_fst_subgraphOfAdj hvw.symm
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj_of_ne_of_ne {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) (hv : u ≠ v)
(hw : u ≠ w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u = ∅ := by
ext
simp [hv.symm, hw.symm]
theorem neighborSet_subgraphOfAdj [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).neighborSet u =
(if u = v then {w} else ∅) ∪ if u = w then {v} else ∅ := by
split_ifs <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*]
theorem singletonSubgraph_fst_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph u ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
theorem singletonSubgraph_snd_le_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} {h : G.Adj u v} :
G.singletonSubgraph v ≤ G.subgraphOfAdj h := by
simp
@[simp]
lemma support_subgraphOfAdj {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj h).support = {u , v} := by
ext
rw [Subgraph.mem_support]
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.elim (fun hl ↦ ⟨v, .inl ⟨hl.symm, rfl⟩⟩) fun hr ↦ ⟨u, .inr ⟨rfl, hr.symm⟩⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, hw⟩
exact hw.elim (fun h1 ↦ .inl h1.1.symm) fun hr ↦ .inr hr.2.symm
end MkProperties
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V}
/-! ### Subgraphs of subgraphs -/
/-- Given a subgraph of a subgraph of `G`, construct a subgraph of `G`. -/
protected abbrev coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.map G'.hom
/-- Given a subgraph of `G`, restrict it to being a subgraph of another subgraph `G'` by
taking the portion of `G` that intersects `G'`. -/
protected abbrev restrict {G' : G.Subgraph} : G.Subgraph → G'.coe.Subgraph :=
Subgraph.comap G'.hom
@[simp]
lemma verts_coeSubgraph {G' : Subgraph G} (G'' : Subgraph G'.coe) :
(Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'').verts = (G''.verts : Set V) := rfl
lemma coeSubgraph_adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) (v w : V) :
(G'.coeSubgraph G'').Adj v w ↔
∃ (hv : v ∈ G'.verts) (hw : w ∈ G'.verts), G''.Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
simp [Relation.Map]
lemma restrict_adj {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} (v w : G'.verts) :
(G'.restrict G'').Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ G''.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem restrict_coeSubgraph {G' : G.Subgraph} (G'' : G'.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.restrict (Subgraph.coeSubgraph G'') = G'' := by
ext
· simp
· rw [restrict_adj, coeSubgraph_adj]
simpa using G''.adj_sub
theorem coeSubgraph_injective (G' : G.Subgraph) :
Function.Injective (Subgraph.coeSubgraph : G'.coe.Subgraph → G.Subgraph) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective restrict_coeSubgraph
lemma coeSubgraph_le {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : H.coe.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph H' ≤ H := by
constructor
· simp
· rintro v w ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact H'.adj_sub h
lemma coeSubgraph_restrict_eq {H : G.Subgraph} (H' : G.Subgraph) :
Subgraph.coeSubgraph (H.restrict H') = H ⊓ H' := by
ext
· simp [and_comm]
· simp_rw [coeSubgraph_adj, restrict_adj]
simp only [exists_and_left, exists_prop, inf_adj, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp [H.edge_vert h, H.edge_vert h.symm]
/-! ### Edge deletion -/
/-- Given a subgraph `G'` and a set of vertex pairs, remove all of the corresponding edges
from its edge set, if present.
See also: `SimpleGraph.deleteEdges`. -/
def deleteEdges (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) : G.Subgraph where
verts := G'.verts
Adj := G'.Adj \ Sym2.ToRel s
adj_sub h' := G'.adj_sub h'.1
edge_vert h' := G'.edge_vert h'.1
symm a b := by simp [G'.adj_comm, Sym2.eq_swap]
section DeleteEdges
variable {G' : G.Subgraph} (s : Set (Sym2 V))
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_verts : (G'.deleteEdges s).verts = G'.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_adj (v w : V) : (G'.deleteEdges s).Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj v w ∧ ¬s(v, w) ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_deleteEdges (s s' : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).deleteEdges s' = G'.deleteEdges (s ∪ s') := by
ext <;> simp [and_assoc, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_empty_eq : G'.deleteEdges ∅ = G' := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_spanningCoe_eq :
G'.spanningCoe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe := by
ext
simp
theorem deleteEdges_coe_eq (s : Set (Sym2 G'.verts)) :
G'.coe.deleteEdges s = (G'.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) '' s)).coe := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_adj, coe_adj, deleteEdges_adj, Set.mem_image, not_exists,
not_and, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor
· intro hs
refine Sym2.ind ?_
rintro ⟨v', hv'⟩ ⟨w', hw'⟩
simp only [Sym2.map_pair_eq, Sym2.eq]
contrapose!
rintro (_ | _) <;> simpa only [Sym2.eq_swap]
· intro h' hs
exact h' _ hs rfl
theorem coe_deleteEdges_eq (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).coe = G'.coe.deleteEdges (Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' s) := by
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp
theorem deleteEdges_le : G'.deleteEdges s ≤ G' := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [subset_rfl]
theorem deleteEdges_le_of_le {s s' : Set (Sym2 V)} (h : s ⊆ s') :
G'.deleteEdges s' ≤ G'.deleteEdges s := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual only [deleteEdges_verts, deleteEdges_adj,
true_and, and_imp, subset_rfl]
exact fun _ _ _ hs' hs ↦ hs' (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_left_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (G'.edgeSet ∩ s) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_inter_edgeSet_right_eq :
G'.deleteEdges (s ∩ G'.edgeSet) = G'.deleteEdges s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
theorem coe_deleteEdges_le : (G'.deleteEdges s).coe ≤ (G'.coe : SimpleGraph G'.verts) := by
intro v w
simp +contextual
theorem spanningCoe_deleteEdges_le (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G'.deleteEdges s).spanningCoe ≤ G'.spanningCoe :=
spanningCoe_le_of_le (deleteEdges_le s)
end DeleteEdges
/-! ### Induced subgraphs -/
/- Given a subgraph, we can change its vertex set while removing any invalid edges, which
gives induced subgraphs. See also `SimpleGraph.induce` for the `SimpleGraph` version, which,
unlike for subgraphs, results in a graph with a different vertex type. -/
/-- The induced subgraph of a subgraph. The expectation is that `s ⊆ G'.verts` for the usual
notion of an induced subgraph, but, in general, `s` is taken to be the new vertex set and edges
are induced from the subgraph `G'`. -/
@[simps]
def induce (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := s
Adj u v := u ∈ s ∧ v ∈ s ∧ G'.Adj u v
adj_sub h := G'.adj_sub h.2.2
edge_vert h := h.1
symm _ _ h := ⟨h.2.1, h.1, G'.symm h.2.2⟩
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.induce_eq_coe_induce_top (s : Set V) :
G.induce s = ((⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce s).coe := by
ext
simp
section Induce
variable {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} {s s' : Set V}
theorem induce_mono (hg : G' ≤ G'') (hs : s ⊆ s') : G'.induce s ≤ G''.induce s' := by
constructor
· simp [hs]
· simp +contextual only [induce_adj, and_imp]
intro v w hv hw ha
exact ⟨hs hv, hs hw, hg.2 ha⟩
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem induce_mono_left (hg : G' ≤ G'') : G'.induce s ≤ G''.induce s :=
induce_mono hg subset_rfl
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem induce_mono_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : G'.induce s ≤ G'.induce s' :=
induce_mono le_rfl hs
@[simp]
theorem induce_empty : G'.induce ∅ = ⊥ := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem induce_self_verts : G'.induce G'.verts = G' := by
ext
· simp
· constructor <;>
simp +contextual only [induce_adj, imp_true_iff, and_true]
exact fun ha ↦ ⟨G'.edge_vert ha, G'.edge_vert ha.symm⟩
lemma le_induce_top_verts : G' ≤ (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce G'.verts :=
calc G' = G'.induce G'.verts := Subgraph.induce_self_verts.symm
_ ≤ (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce G'.verts := Subgraph.induce_mono_left le_top
lemma le_induce_union : G'.induce s ⊔ G'.induce s' ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
constructor
· simp only [verts_sup, induce_verts, Set.Subset.rfl]
· simp only [sup_adj, induce_adj, Set.mem_union]
rintro v w (h | h) <;> simp [h]
lemma le_induce_union_left : G'.induce s ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
exact (sup_le_iff.mp le_induce_union).1
lemma le_induce_union_right : G'.induce s' ≤ G'.induce (s ∪ s') := by
exact (sup_le_iff.mp le_induce_union).2
theorem singletonSubgraph_eq_induce {v : V} :
G.singletonSubgraph v = (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {v} := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [-Set.bot_eq_empty, Prop.bot_eq_false]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_eq_induce {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) :
G.subgraphOfAdj hvw = (⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {v, w} := by
ext
· simp
· constructor
· intro h
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_adj, Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff] at h
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h <;> simp [hvw, hvw.symm]
· intro h
simp only [induce_adj, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, top_adj] at h
obtain ⟨rfl | rfl, rfl | rfl, ha⟩ := h <;> first |exact (ha.ne rfl).elim|simp
instance instDecidableRel_induce_adj (s : Set V) [∀ a, Decidable (a ∈ s)] [DecidableRel G'.Adj] :
DecidableRel (G'.induce s).Adj :=
fun _ _ ↦ instDecidableAnd
end Induce
/-- Given a subgraph and a set of vertices, delete all the vertices from the subgraph,
if present. Any edges incident to the deleted vertices are deleted as well. -/
abbrev deleteVerts (G' : G.Subgraph) (s : Set V) : G.Subgraph :=
G'.induce (G'.verts \ s)
section DeleteVerts
variable {G' : G.Subgraph} {s : Set V}
theorem deleteVerts_verts : (G'.deleteVerts s).verts = G'.verts \ s :=
rfl
theorem deleteVerts_adj {u v : V} :
(G'.deleteVerts s).Adj u v ↔ u ∈ G'.verts ∧ ¬u ∈ s ∧ v ∈ G'.verts ∧ ¬v ∈ s ∧ G'.Adj u v := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem deleteVerts_deleteVerts (s s' : Set V) :
(G'.deleteVerts s).deleteVerts s' = G'.deleteVerts (s ∪ s') := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [not_or, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem deleteVerts_empty : G'.deleteVerts ∅ = G' := by
simp [deleteVerts]
theorem deleteVerts_le : G'.deleteVerts s ≤ G' := by
constructor <;> simp [Set.diff_subset]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem deleteVerts_mono {G' G'' : G.Subgraph} (h : G' ≤ G'') :
G'.deleteVerts s ≤ G''.deleteVerts s :=
induce_mono h (Set.diff_subset_diff_left h.1)
@[mono]
lemma deleteVerts_mono' {G' : SimpleGraph V} (u : Set V) (h : G ≤ G') :
((⊤ : Subgraph G).deleteVerts u).coe ≤ ((⊤ : Subgraph G').deleteVerts u).coe := by
intro v w hvw
aesop
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem deleteVerts_anti {s s' : Set V} (h : s ⊆ s') : G'.deleteVerts s' ≤ G'.deleteVerts s :=
induce_mono (le_refl _) (Set.diff_subset_diff_right h)
@[simp]
theorem deleteVerts_inter_verts_left_eq : G'.deleteVerts (G'.verts ∩ s) = G'.deleteVerts s := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [imp_false]
|
@[simp]
theorem deleteVerts_inter_verts_set_right_eq :
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 1,252 | 1,254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
/-!
# Probability density function
This file defines the probability density function of random variables, by which we mean
measurable functions taking values in a Borel space. The probability density function is defined
as the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the law of `X`. In particular, a measurable function `f`
is said to the probability density function of a random variable `X` if for all measurable
sets `S`, `ℙ(X ∈ S) = ∫ x in S, f x dx`. Probability density functions are one way of describing
the distribution of a random variable, and are useful for calculating probabilities and
finding moments (although the latter is better achieved with moment generating functions).
This file also defines the continuous uniform distribution and proves some properties about
random variables with this distribution.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.HasPDF` : A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to `HasPDF` with
respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E` if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X`
is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ` and they `HaveLebesgueDecomposition`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf` : If `X` is a random variable that `HasPDF X ℙ μ`, then `pdf X`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform` : A random variable `X` is said to follow the uniform
distribution if it has a constant probability density function with a compact, non-null support.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_pdf_smul` : Law of the unconscious statistician,
i.e. if a random variable `X : Ω → E` has pdf `f`, then `𝔼(g(X)) = ∫ x, f x • g x dx` for
all measurable `g : E → F`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_mul_eq_integral` : A real-valued random variable `X` with
pdf `f` has expectation `∫ x, x * f x dx`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.integral_eq` : If `X` follows the uniform distribution with
its pdf having support `s`, then `X` has expectation `(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x dx` where `λ`
is the Lebesgue measure.
## TODO
Ultimately, we would also like to define characteristic functions to describe distributions as
it exists for all random variables. However, to define this, we will need Fourier transforms
which we currently do not have.
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E]
/-- A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to have a probability density function (`HasPDF`)
with respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E`
if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`
and they have a Lebesgue decomposition (`HaveLebesgueDecomposition`). -/
class HasPDF {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
Prop where
protected aemeasurable' : AEMeasurable X ℙ
protected haveLebesgueDecomposition' : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
protected absolutelyContinuous' : map X ℙ ≪ μ
section HasPDF
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X Y : Ω → E} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
theorem hasPDF_iff :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩⟩
theorem hasPDF_iff_of_aemeasurable (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hasPDF_iff]
simp only [hX, true_and]
variable (X ℙ μ) in
@[measurability]
theorem HasPDF.aemeasurable [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : AEMeasurable X ℙ := HasPDF.aemeasurable' μ
instance HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ :=
HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition'
theorem HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : map X ℙ ≪ μ := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous'
/-- A random variable that `HasPDF` is quasi-measure preserving. -/
theorem HasPDF.quasiMeasurePreserving_of_measurable (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E)
[HasPDF X ℙ μ] (h : Measurable X) : QuasiMeasurePreserving X ℙ μ :=
{ measurable := h
absolutelyContinuous := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous .. }
theorem HasPDF.congr (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] : HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨(HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ).congr hXY, ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.haveLebesgueDecomposition,
ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.absolutelyContinuous⟩
theorem HasPDF.congr_iff (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY, fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias HasPDF.congr' := HasPDF.congr_iff
/-- X `HasPDF` if there is a pdf `f` such that `map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f`. -/
theorem hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) (f : E → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨hX, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [h]
· rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
exact haveLebesgueDecomposition_withDensity μ hf.measurable_mk
· exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f
end HasPDF
/-- If `X` is a random variable, then `pdf X ℙ μ`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`. -/
def pdf {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
E → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ
theorem pdf_def {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
pdf X ℙ μ = (map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ := rfl
theorem pdf_of_not_aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
{X : Ω → E} (hX : ¬AEMeasurable X ℙ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [pdf_def, map_of_not_aemeasurable hX]
exact rnDeriv_zero μ
theorem pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
{μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} (h : ¬(map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ) : pdf X ℙ μ = 0 :=
rnDeriv_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition h
theorem aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
(X : Ω → E) (h : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
contrapose! h
exact pdf_of_not_aemeasurable h
theorem hasPDF_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E}
(hac : map X ℙ ≪ μ) (hpdf : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, hac⟩
· exact aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero X hpdf
· contrapose! hpdf
have := pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition hpdf
filter_upwards using congrFun this
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : Measurable (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
exact measurable_rnDeriv _ _
theorem withDensity_pdf_le_map {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : μ.withDensity (pdf X ℙ μ) ≤ map X ℙ :=
withDensity_rnDeriv_le _ _
theorem setLIntegral_pdf_le_map {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) (s : Set E) :
∫⁻ x in s, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ ≤ map X ℙ s := by
apply (withDensity_apply_le _ s).trans
exact withDensity_pdf_le_map _ _ _ s
theorem map_eq_withDensity_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] :
map X ℙ = μ.withDensity (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
rw [pdf_def, withDensity_rnDeriv_eq _ _ hX.absolutelyContinuous]
theorem map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] {s : Set E}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : map X ℙ s = ∫⁻ x in s, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ := by
rw [← withDensity_apply _ hs, map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ]
namespace pdf
variable {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
protected theorem congr {X Y : Ω → E} (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : pdf X ℙ μ = pdf Y ℙ μ := by
rw [pdf_def, pdf_def, map_congr hXY]
theorem lintegral_eq_measure_univ {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] :
∫⁻ x, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ = ℙ Set.univ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_univ, ← map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf X ℙ μ MeasurableSet.univ,
map_apply_of_aemeasurable (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ) MeasurableSet.univ, Set.preimage_univ]
theorem eq_of_map_eq_withDensity [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] (f : E → ℝ≥0∞)
(hmf : AEMeasurable f μ) : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f ↔ pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ]
apply withDensity_eq_iff (measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).aemeasurable hmf
rw [lintegral_eq_measure_univ]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
theorem eq_of_map_eq_withDensity' [SigmaFinite μ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] (f : E → ℝ≥0∞)
(hmf : AEMeasurable f μ) : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f ↔ pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] f :=
map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ ▸
withDensity_eq_iff_of_sigmaFinite (measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).aemeasurable hmf
nonrec theorem ae_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, pdf X ℙ μ x < ∞ :=
rnDeriv_lt_top (map X ℙ) μ
nonrec theorem ofReal_toReal_ae_eq [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} :
| (fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] pdf X ℙ μ :=
ofReal_toReal_ae_eq ae_lt_top
| Mathlib/Probability/Density.lean | 205 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
(l.zipWith ((fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) (List.range l.length)).sum =
b * (l.zipWith (fun a i => a * b ^ i) (List.range l.length)).sum := by
suffices
l.zipWith (fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) (List.range l.length) =
l.zipWith (fun a i=> b * (a * b ^ i)) (List.range l.length)
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, List.zipIdx_eq_zip_range', List.map_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr, ← List.range_eq_range']
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_right, ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux] using
Or.inl hl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d List.mem_cons_self
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
rcases b with - | b
· rcases n with - | n
· rfl
· simp
· rcases b with - | b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n h => ?_
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· simp [IH, h]
aesop
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
lemma ofDigits_inj_of_len_eq {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {L1 L2 : List ℕ}
(len : L1.length = L2.length) (w1 : ∀ l ∈ L1, l < b) (w2 : ∀ l ∈ L2, l < b)
(h : ofDigits b L1 = ofDigits b L2) : L1 = L2 := by
induction' L1 with D L ih generalizing L2
· simp only [List.length_nil] at len
exact (List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp len.symm).symm
obtain ⟨d, l, rfl⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_length_eq_add_one len.symm
simp only [List.length_cons, add_left_inj] at len
simp only [ofDigits_cons] at h
have eqd : D = d := by
have H : (D + b * ofDigits b L) % b = (d + b * ofDigits b l) % b := by rw [h]
simpa [mod_eq_of_lt (w2 d List.mem_cons_self),
mod_eq_of_lt (w1 D List.mem_cons_self)] using H
simp only [eqd, add_right_inj, mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (zero_lt_of_lt hb)] at h
have := ih len (fun a ha ↦ w1 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem D ha)
(fun a ha ↦ w2 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem d ha) h
rw [eqd, this]
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them -/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero_iff, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro d hd
rcases n with - | n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by linarith)
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd List.mem_cons_self
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
theorem digits_base_pow_mul {b k m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b (b ^ k * m) = List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hmb : 0 < m * b := lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' hm hb
let h1 := digits_def' hb hmb
have h2 : m = m * b / b :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left (ne_zero_of_lt hb) rfl
simp only [mul_mod_left, ← h2] at h1
rw [List.replicate_succ', List.append_assoc, List.singleton_append, ← h1, ← ih hmb]
ring_nf
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_append_zeroes_append_digits {b k m n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b n ++ List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m =
digits b (n + b ^ ((digits b n).length + k) * m) := by
rw [List.append_assoc, ← digits_base_pow_mul hb hm]
simp only [digits_append_digits (zero_lt_of_lt hb), digits_inj_iff, add_right_inj]
ring
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp +arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ hi =>
simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
theorem digit_sum_le (p n : ℕ) : List.sum (digits p n) ≤ n := by
induction' n with n
· exact digits_zero _ ▸ Nat.le_refl (List.sum [])
· induction' p with p
· rw [digits_zero_succ, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil, add_zero]
· nth_rw 2 [← ofDigits_digits p.succ (n + 1)]
rw [← ofDigits_one <| digits p.succ n.succ]
exact ofDigits_monotone (digits p.succ n.succ) <| Nat.succ_pos p
theorem pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.getLast hl ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * ofDigits (b + 2) l := by
rw [← List.dropLast_append_getLast hl]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length, zero_add, List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_append,
List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
have : 0 < l.getLast hl := by rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero]
convert Nat.mul_le_mul_left ((b + 2) ^ (l.length - 1)) this using 1
rw [Nat.mul_one]
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
(b+2)^((number of digits in the base (b+2) representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length ≤ (b + 2) * m := by
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [] := digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm
convert @pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits b (digits (b+2) m)
this (getLast_digit_ne_zero _ hm)
rw [ofDigits_digits]
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
b^((number of digits in the base b representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) :
m ≠ 0 → b ^ (digits b m).length ≤ b * m := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p` is the same as interpreting the tail.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail {p : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) : ofDigits p digits / p = ofDigits p digits.tail := by
induction' digits with hd tl
· simp [ofDigits]
· refine Eq.trans (add_mul_div_left hd _ hpos) ?_
rw [Nat.div_eq_of_lt <| w₁ _ List.mem_cons_self, zero_add]
rfl
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p^i` is the same as dropping `i`.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop
{p : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) :
ofDigits p digits / p ^ i = ofDigits p (digits.drop i) := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· rw [Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, hi, ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail hpos
(List.drop i digits) fun x hx ↦ w₁ x <| List.mem_of_mem_drop hx, ← List.drop_one,
List.drop_drop, add_comm]
/-- Dividing `n` by `p^i` is like truncating the first `i` digits of `n` in base `p`.
-/
lemma self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop {p : ℕ} (i n : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ p) :
n / p ^ i = ofDigits p ((p.digits n).drop i) := by
convert ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop i (zero_lt_of_lt h) (p.digits n)
(fun l hl ↦ digits_lt_base h hl)
exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
open Finset
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ}
(L : List ℕ) {h_nonempty} (h_ne_zero : L.getLast h_nonempty ≠ 0) (h_lt : ∀ l ∈ L, l < p) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range L.length, (ofDigits p L) / p ^ i.succ = (ofDigits p L) - L.sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· induction' L with hd tl ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· simp only [List.length_cons, List.sum_cons, self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h,
digits_ofDigits p h (hd :: tl) h_lt (fun _ => h_ne_zero)]
simp only [ofDigits]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_id]
simp only [List.drop, List.drop_length]
obtain rfl | h' := em <| tl = []
· simp [ofDigits]
· have w₁' := fun l hl ↦ h_lt l <| List.mem_cons_of_mem hd hl
have w₂' := fun (h : tl ≠ []) ↦ (List.getLast_cons h) ▸ h_ne_zero
have ih := ih (w₂' h') w₁'
simp only [self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h, digits_ofDigits p h tl w₁' w₂',
← Nat.one_add] at ih
have := sum_singleton (fun x ↦ ofDigits p <| tl.drop x) tl.length
rw [← Ico_succ_singleton, List.drop_length, ofDigits] at this
have h₁ : 1 ≤ tl.length := List.length_pos_iff.mpr h'
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ <| h₁, ← add_zero (∑ x ∈ Ico _ _, ofDigits p (tl.drop x)),
← this, sum_Ico_consecutive _ h₁ <| (le_add_right tl.length 1),
← sum_Ico_add _ 0 tl.length 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, mul_add, mul_add, ih, range_one, sum_singleton, List.drop, ofDigits,
mul_zero, add_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <| sum_le_ofDigits _ <| Nat.le_of_lt h]
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul <| ofDigits p tl]
rw [← add_mul, Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_of_lt h), Nat.add_sub_add_left]
· simp [ofDigits_one]
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases L
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits]
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (log p n).succ, n / p ^ i.succ = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· convert sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits (p.digits n) (getLast_digit_ne_zero p hn) <|
(fun l a ↦ digits_lt_base h a)
· refine (digits_len p n h hn).symm
all_goals exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
· simp
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases n
all_goals simp
/-! ### Binary -/
theorem digits_two_eq_bits (n : ℕ) : digits 2 n = n.bits.map fun b => cond b 1 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRecFromOne with b n h ih
· simp
· simp
rw [bits_append_bit _ _ fun hn => absurd hn h]
cases b
· rw [digits_def' one_lt_two]
· simpa [Nat.bit]
· simpa [Nat.bit, pos_iff_ne_zero]
· simpa [Nat.bit, add_comm, digits_add 2 one_lt_two 1 n, Nat.add_mul_div_left]
/-! ### Modular Arithmetic -/
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
theorem dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits {α : Type*} [CommRing α] {a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b)
(L : List ℕ) : k ∣ ofDigits a L - ofDigits b L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· change k ∣ 0 - 0
simp
· simp only [ofDigits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih
theorem ofDigits_modEq' (b b' : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [MOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [MOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Nat.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod]
theorem ofDigits_modEq (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [MOD k] :=
ofDigits_modEq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq k).symm L
theorem ofDigits_mod (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_modEq b k L
theorem ofDigits_mod_eq_head! (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) : ofDigits b l % b = l.head! % b := by
induction l <;> simp [Nat.ofDigits, Int.ModEq]
theorem head!_digits {b n : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 1) : (Nat.digits b n).head! = n % b := by
by_cases hb : 1 < b
· rcases n with _ | n
· simp
· nth_rw 2 [← Nat.ofDigits_digits b (n + 1)]
rw [Nat.ofDigits_mod_eq_head! _ _]
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.digits_lt_base hb <| List.head!_mem_self <|
Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).symm
· rcases n with _ | _ <;> simp_all [show b = 0 by omega]
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq' (b b' : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [ZMOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [ZMOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Int.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod]
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [ZMOD k] :=
ofDigits_zmodeq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq ↑k).symm L
theorem ofDigits_zmod (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_zmodeq b k L
theorem modEq_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits b' n).sum [MOD b] := by
rw [← ofDigits_one]
conv =>
congr
· skip
· rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
convert ofDigits_modEq b' b (digits b' n)
exact h.symm
theorem modEq_three_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 3] :=
modEq_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem modEq_nine_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 9] :=
modEq_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem zmodeq_ofDigits_digits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : b' ≡ c [ZMOD b]) (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ofDigits c (digits b' n) [ZMOD b] := by
conv =>
congr
· skip
· rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
rw [coe_int_ofDigits]
apply ofDigits_zmodeq' _ _ _ h
theorem ofDigits_neg_one :
∀ L : List ℕ, ofDigits (-1 : ℤ) L = (L.map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)).alternatingSum
| [] => rfl
| [n] => by simp [ofDigits, List.alternatingSum]
| a :: b :: t => by
simp only [ofDigits, List.alternatingSum, List.map_cons, ofDigits_neg_one t]
ring
theorem modEq_eleven_digits_sum (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ((digits 10 n).map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)).alternatingSum [ZMOD 11] := by
have t := zmodeq_ofDigits_digits 11 10 (-1 : ℤ) (by unfold Int.ModEq; rfl) n
rwa [ofDigits_neg_one] at t
/-! ## Divisibility -/
theorem dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) :
b ∣ n ↔ b ∣ (digits b' n).sum := by
rw [← ofDigits_one]
conv_lhs => rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ofDigits_mod, h]
/-- **Divisibility by 3 Rule** -/
theorem three_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) : 3 ∣ n ↔ 3 ∣ (digits 10 n).sum :=
dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem nine_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) : 9 ∣ n ↔ 9 ∣ (digits 10 n).sum :=
dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem dvd_iff_dvd_ofDigits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : (b : ℤ) ∣ (b' : ℤ) - c) (n : ℕ) :
b ∣ n ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ ofDigits c (digits b' n) := by
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
exact
dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub (zmodeq_ofDigits_digits b b' c (Int.modEq_iff_dvd.2 h).symm _).symm.dvd
theorem eleven_dvd_iff :
11 ∣ n ↔ (11 : ℤ) ∣ ((digits 10 n).map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)).alternatingSum := by
have t := dvd_iff_dvd_ofDigits 11 10 (-1 : ℤ) (by norm_num) n
rw [ofDigits_neg_one] at t
exact t
theorem eleven_dvd_of_palindrome (p : (digits 10 n).Palindrome) (h : Even (digits 10 n).length) :
11 ∣ n := by
let dig := (digits 10 n).map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)
replace h : Even dig.length := by rwa [List.length_map]
refine eleven_dvd_iff.2 ⟨0, (?_ : dig.alternatingSum = 0)⟩
have := dig.alternatingSum_reverse
rw [(p.map _).reverse_eq, _root_.pow_succ', h.neg_one_pow, mul_one, neg_one_zsmul] at this
exact eq_zero_of_neg_eq this.symm
/-! ### `Nat.toDigits` length -/
lemma toDigitsCore_lens_eq_aux (b f : Nat) :
∀ (n : Nat) (l1 l2 : List Char), l1.length = l2.length →
(Nat.toDigitsCore b f n l1).length = (Nat.toDigitsCore b f n l2).length := by
induction f with (simp only [Nat.toDigitsCore, List.length]; intro n l1 l2 hlen)
| zero => assumption
| succ f ih =>
if hx : n / b = 0 then
simp only [hx, if_true, List.length, congrArg (fun l ↦ l + 1) hlen]
else
simp only [hx, if_false]
specialize ih (n / b) (Nat.digitChar (n % b) :: l1) (Nat.digitChar (n % b) :: l2)
simp only [List.length, congrArg (fun l ↦ l + 1) hlen] at ih
exact ih trivial
lemma toDigitsCore_lens_eq (b f : Nat) : ∀ (n : Nat) (c : Char) (tl : List Char),
(Nat.toDigitsCore b f n (c :: tl)).length = (Nat.toDigitsCore b f n tl).length + 1 := by
induction f with (intro n c tl; simp only [Nat.toDigitsCore, List.length])
| succ f ih =>
if hnb : (n / b) = 0 then
simp only [hnb, if_true, List.length]
else
generalize hx : Nat.digitChar (n % b) = x
simp only [hx, hnb, if_false] at ih
simp only [hnb, if_false]
specialize ih (n / b) c (x :: tl)
rw [← ih]
have lens_eq : (x :: (c :: tl)).length = (c :: x :: tl).length := by simp
apply toDigitsCore_lens_eq_aux
exact lens_eq
lemma nat_repr_len_aux (n b e : Nat) (h_b_pos : 0 < b) : n < b ^ e.succ → n / b < b ^ e := by
simp only [Nat.pow_succ]
exact (@Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul b n (b ^ e) h_b_pos).mpr
/-- The String representation produced by toDigitsCore has the proper length relative to
the number of digits in `n < e` for some base `b`. Since this works with any base,
it can be used for binary, decimal, and hex. -/
lemma toDigitsCore_length (b f n e : Nat) (h_e_pos : 0 < e) (hlt : n < b ^ e) :
(Nat.toDigitsCore b f n []).length ≤ e := by
induction f generalizing n e hlt h_e_pos with
| zero => simp only [toDigitsCore, List.length, zero_le]
| succ f ih =>
simp only [toDigitsCore]
cases e with
| zero => exact False.elim (Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h_e_pos)
| succ e =>
cases e with
| zero =>
rw [zero_add, pow_one] at hlt
simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt hlt]
| succ e =>
specialize ih (n / b) _ (add_one_pos e) (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [← pow_add_one'])
split_ifs
· simp only [List.length_singleton, _root_.zero_le, succ_le_succ]
· simp only [toDigitsCore_lens_eq b f (n / b) (Nat.digitChar <| n % b),
| Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, ih]
/-- The core implementation of `Nat.toDigits` returns a String with length less than or equal to the
number of digits in the base-`b` number (represented by `e`). For example, the string
representation of any number less than `b ^ 3` has a length less than or equal to 3. -/
lemma toDigits_length (b n e : Nat) : 0 < e → n < b ^ e → (Nat.toDigits b n).length ≤ e :=
toDigitsCore_length _ _ _ _
/-- The core implementation of `Nat.repr` returns a String with length less than or equal to the
number of digits in the decimal number (represented by `e`). For example, the decimal string
representation of any number less than 1000 (10 ^ 3) has a length less than or equal to 3. -/
lemma repr_length (n e : Nat) : 0 < e → n < 10 ^ e → (Nat.repr n).length ≤ e :=
toDigits_length _ _ _
/-! ### `norm_digits` tactic -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 800 | 814 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
/-- Addition of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q :=
(add_def _ _).symm
/-- Subtraction of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q :=
(sub_def _ _).symm
/-- Additive inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p :=
(neg_def _).symm
/-- The multiplicative unit of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
/-- Multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
/-- Division of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q :=
(div_def _ _).symm
/-- Multiplicative inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ :=
(inv_def _).symm
-- Auxiliary lemma for the `Field` instance
theorem mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {p : RatFunc K}, p ≠ 0 → p * p⁻¹ = 1
| ⟨p⟩, h => by
have : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h <| by rw [hp, ofFractionRing_zero]
simpa only [← ofFractionRing_inv, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_one,
ofFractionRing.injEq] using
mul_inv_cancel₀ this
end IsDomain
section SMul
variable {R : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : R → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| r, ⟨p⟩ => ⟨r • p⟩
instance [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : SMul R (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.smul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (c • p) = c • ofFractionRing p :=
(smul_def _ _).symm
theorem toFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : RatFunc K) :
toFractionRing (c • p) = c • toFractionRing p := by
cases p
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul]
theorem smul_eq_C_smul (x : RatFunc K) (r : K) : r • x = Polynomial.C r • x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Localization.induction_on
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul, ← ofFractionRing_smul, Localization.smul_mk,
Localization.smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul]
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]]
variable [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]]
theorem mk_smul (c : R) (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk (c • p) q = c • RatFunc.mk p q := by
letI : SMulZeroClass R (FractionRing K[X]) := inferInstance
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mk_zero, mk_zero, ← ofFractionRing_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, ← Localization.smul_mk, ←
ofFractionRing_smul]
instance : IsScalarTower R K[X] (RatFunc K) :=
⟨fun c p q => q.induction_on' fun q r _ => by rw [← mk_smul, smul_assoc, mk_smul, mk_smul]⟩
end IsDomain
end SMul
variable (K)
instance [Subsingleton K] : Subsingleton (RatFunc K) :=
toFractionRing_injective.subsingleton
instance : Inhabited (RatFunc K) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial K] : Nontrivial (RatFunc K) :=
ofFractionRing_injective.nontrivial
/-- `RatFunc K` is isomorphic to the field of fractions of `K[X]`, as rings.
This is an auxiliary definition; `simp`-normal form is `IsLocalization.algEquiv`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def toFractionRingRingEquiv : RatFunc K ≃+* FractionRing K[X] where
toFun := toFractionRing
invFun := ofFractionRing
left_inv := fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_add' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_mul]
end Field
section TacticInterlude
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by working in `FractionRing K[X]`. -/
macro "frac_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
· repeat (rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _))
try simp only [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_sub,
← ofFractionRing_neg, ← ofFractionRing_one, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_div,
← ofFractionRing_inv,
add_assoc, zero_add, add_zero, mul_assoc, mul_zero, mul_one, mul_add, inv_zero,
add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, div_eq_mul_inv,
add_mul, zero_mul, one_mul, neg_mul, mul_neg, add_neg_cancel])
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by applying `RatFunc.induction_on`. -/
macro "smul_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
repeat
(first
| rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)
| intro) <;>
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_smul] <;>
simp only [add_comm, mul_comm, zero_smul, succ_nsmul, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_add, mul_one, mul_zero,
neg_add, mul_neg,
Int.cast_zero, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
Int.cast_negSucc, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_succ,
Localization.mk_zero, Localization.add_mk_self, Localization.neg_mk,
ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_neg])
end TacticInterlude
section CommRing
variable (K) [CommRing K]
/-- `RatFunc K` is a commutative monoid.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (RatFunc K) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by frac_tac
mul_comm := by frac_tac
one := 1
one_mul := by frac_tac
mul_one := by frac_tac
npow := npowRec
/-- `RatFunc K` is an additive commutative group.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (RatFunc K) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by frac_tac
add_comm := by frac_tac
zero := 0
zero_add := by frac_tac
add_zero := by frac_tac
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by frac_tac
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by frac_tac
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by smul_tac
nsmul_succ _ := by smul_tac
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by smul_tac
zsmul_succ' _ := by smul_tac
zsmul_neg' _ := by smul_tac
instance instCommRing : CommRing (RatFunc K) :=
{ instCommMonoid K, instAddCommGroup K with
zero := 0
sub := Sub.sub
zero_mul := by frac_tac
mul_zero := by frac_tac
left_distrib := by frac_tac
right_distrib := by frac_tac
one := 1
nsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul := (· • ·)
npow := npowRec }
variable {K}
section LiftHom
open RatFunc
variable {G₀ L R S F : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero G₀] [Field L] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R[X] S[X]]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def map [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →* RatFunc S where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f
(fun n d => if h : φ d ∈ S[X]⁰ then ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, h⟩) else 0)
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
simp only [Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq), Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq'),
dif_pos, ofFractionRing.injEq, Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff]
refine Localization.r_of_eq ?_
simpa only [map_mul] using congr_arg φ h
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, OneMemClass.one_mem, dite_true, ofFractionRing.injEq,
Localization.mk_one, Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x; obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
have hq : φ q ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q.prop
have hq' : φ q' ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q'.prop
have hqq' : φ ↑(q * q') ∈ S[X]⁰ := by simpa using Submonoid.mul_mem _ hq hq'
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos hq,
dif_pos hq', dif_pos hqq', ← ofFractionRing_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul,
Localization.mk_mul, Submonoid.mk_mul_mk]
theorem map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
map φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) =
ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, hφ d.prop⟩) := by
simp only [map, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ d.2), ↓reduceDIte]
theorem map_injective [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ)
(hf : Function.Injective φ) : Function.Injective (map φ hφ) := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
simpa only [map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, ofFractionRing_injective.eq_iff,
Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff, Localization.r_iff_exists, mul_cancel_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors,
exists_const, ← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] using h
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →+* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapRingHom [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S :=
{ map φ hφ with
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, ← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰),
← Localization.mk_zero (1 : S[X]⁰), map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, map_zero,
Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
· simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk, map_add, map_mul,
MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul,
-- We have to specify `S[X]⁰` to `mk_mul_mk`, otherwise it will try to rewrite
-- the wrong occurrence.
Submonoid.mk_mul_mk S[X]⁰] }
theorem coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapRingHom φ hφ : RatFunc R → RatFunc S) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
-- TODO: Generalize to `FunLike` classes,
/-- Lift a monoid with zero homomorphism `R[X] →*₀ G₀` to a `RatFunc R →*₀ G₀`
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftMonoidWithZeroHom (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →*₀ G₀ where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f (fun p q => φ p / φ q) fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim p q, Subsingleton.elim p' q, Subsingleton.elim q' q]
rw [div_eq_div_iff, ← map_mul, mul_comm p, h, map_mul, mul_comm] <;>
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ ‹_›)
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, div_one]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with p q
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p' q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul]
simp only [liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, div_mul_div_comm, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰), liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
map_zero, zero_div]
| theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ)
(n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ') := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 421 | 429 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
section
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom :
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (X Y : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv ≫ ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y) = X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom := by
rw [← triangle, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).hom = X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (X Y : C) :
(X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv) ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv = (ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y)]
/-- We state it as a simp lemma, which is regarded as an involved version of
`id_whiskerRight X Y : 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y)`.
-/
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).hom ▷ Y = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom ≫ (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).inv ▷ Y = (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (X ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv = (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv ≫ (λ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = (λ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv := by simp
end
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ g) ⊗ h) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
| theorem associator_conjugation {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g) ⊗ h = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv := by
rw [associator_inv_naturality, hom_inv_id_assoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 621 | 623 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 343 | 343 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Data.Vector3
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic
/-!
# Diophantine functions and Matiyasevic's theorem
Hilbert's tenth problem asked whether there exists an algorithm which for a given integer polynomial
determines whether this polynomial has integer solutions. It was answered in the negative in 1970,
the final step being completed by Matiyasevic who showed that the power function is Diophantine.
Here a function is called Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine as a set. A subset `S ⊆ ℕ ^ α` in
turn is called Diophantine if there exists an integer polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff
there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
## Main definitions
* `IsPoly`: a predicate stating that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
* `Poly`: the type of multivariate integer polynomial functions.
* `Dioph`: a predicate stating that a set is Diophantine, i.e. a set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is
Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there
exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
* `DiophFn`: a predicate on a function stating that it is Diophantine in the sense that its graph
is Diophantine as a set.
## Main statements
* `pell_dioph` states that solutions to Pell's equation form a Diophantine set.
* `pow_dioph` states that the power function is Diophantine, a version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevic's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
## TODO
* Finish the solution of Hilbert's tenth problem.
* Connect `Poly` to `MvPolynomial`
-/
open Fin2 Function Nat Sum
local infixr:67 " ::ₒ " => Option.elim'
local infixr:65 " ⊗ " => Sum.elim
universe u
/-!
### Multivariate integer polynomials
Note that this duplicates `MvPolynomial`.
-/
section Polynomials
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A predicate asserting that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
(We are being a bit lazy here by allowing many representations for multiplication,
rather than only allowing monomials and addition, but the definition is equivalent
and this is easier to use.) -/
inductive IsPoly : ((α → ℕ) → ℤ) → Prop
| proj : ∀ i, IsPoly fun x : α → ℕ => x i
| const : ∀ n : ℤ, IsPoly fun _ : α → ℕ => n
| sub : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x - g x
| mul : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x * g x
theorem IsPoly.neg {f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} : IsPoly f → IsPoly (-f) := by
rw [← zero_sub]; exact (IsPoly.const 0).sub
theorem IsPoly.add {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} (hf : IsPoly f) (hg : IsPoly g) : IsPoly (f + g) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add]; exact hf.sub hg.neg
/-- The type of multivariate integer polynomials -/
def Poly (α : Type u) := { f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ // IsPoly f }
namespace Poly
section
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Poly α) (α → ℕ) ℤ :=
⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
/-- The underlying function of a `Poly` is a polynomial -/
protected theorem isPoly (f : Poly α) : IsPoly f := f.2
/-- Extensionality for `Poly α` -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Poly α} : (∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g := DFunLike.ext _ _
/-- The `i`th projection function, `x_i`. -/
def proj (i : α) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.proj i⟩
@[simp]
theorem proj_apply (i : α) (x) : proj i x = x i := rfl
/-- The constant function with value `n : ℤ`. -/
def const (n : ℤ) : Poly α := ⟨_, IsPoly.const n⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (n) (x : α → ℕ) : const n x = n := rfl
instance : Zero (Poly α) := ⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (Poly α) := ⟨const 1⟩
instance : Neg (Poly α) := ⟨fun f => ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
instance : Add (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
instance : Sub (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f - g, f.2.sub g.2⟩⟩
instance : Mul (Poly α) := ⟨fun f g => ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Poly α) = const 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : Poly α) = const 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (f : Poly α) : ⇑(-f) = -f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul (f g : Poly α) : ⇑(f * g) = f * g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x) : (0 : Poly α) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (x) : (1 : Poly α) x = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : Poly α) (x) : (-f) x = -f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (f g : Poly α) (x : α → ℕ) : (f * g) x = f x * g x := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Inhabited (Poly α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : AddCommGroup (Poly α) where
add := ((· + ·) : Poly α → Poly α → Poly α)
neg := (Neg.neg : Poly α → Poly α)
sub := Sub.sub
zero := 0
nsmul := @nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec _ ⟨(0 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, add_zero]
zero_add _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, zero_apply, zero_add]
add_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, add_comm]
add_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, ← add_assoc]
neg_add_cancel _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, neg_apply, neg_add_cancel, zero_apply]
instance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α) :=
{ (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α)) with
one := 1
natCast := fun n => Poly.const n
intCast := Poly.const }
instance : CommRing (Poly α) where
__ := (inferInstance : AddCommGroup (Poly α))
__ := (inferInstance : AddGroupWithOne (Poly α))
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec _ ⟨(1 : Poly α)⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, zero_apply, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by ext; rw [mul_apply, one_apply, one_mul]
mul_comm _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [mul_apply, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp_rw [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply mul_add
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext; simp only [add_apply, mul_apply]; apply add_mul
theorem induction {C : Poly α → Prop} (H1 : ∀ i, C (proj i)) (H2 : ∀ n, C (const n))
(H3 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f - g)) (H4 : ∀ f g, C f → C g → C (f * g)) (f : Poly α) : C f := by
obtain ⟨f, pf⟩ := f
induction pf with
| proj => apply H1
| const => apply H2
| sub _ _ ihf ihg => apply H3 _ _ ihf ihg
| mul _ _ ihf ihg => apply H4 _ _ ihf ihg
/-- The sum of squares of a list of polynomials. This is relevant for
Diophantine equations, because it means that a list of equations
can be encoded as a single equation: `x = 0 ∧ y = 0 ∧ z = 0` is
equivalent to `x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0`. -/
def sumsq : List (Poly α) → Poly α
| [] => 0
| p::ps => p * p + sumsq ps
theorem sumsq_nonneg (x : α → ℕ) : ∀ l, 0 ≤ sumsq l x
| [] => le_refl 0
| p::ps => by
rw [sumsq]
exact add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (sumsq_nonneg _ ps)
theorem sumsq_eq_zero (x) : ∀ l, sumsq l x = 0 ↔ l.Forall fun a : Poly α => a x = 0
| [] => eq_self_iff_true _
| p::ps => by
rw [List.forall_cons, ← sumsq_eq_zero _ ps]; rw [sumsq]
exact
⟨fun h : p x * p x + sumsq ps x = 0 =>
have : p x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero <|
le_antisymm
(by
rw [← h]
have t := add_le_add_left (sumsq_nonneg x ps) (p x * p x)
rwa [add_zero] at t)
(mul_self_nonneg _)
⟨this, by simpa [this] using h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => by rw [add_apply, mul_apply, h1, h2]; rfl⟩
end
/-- Map the index set of variables, replacing `x_i` with `x_(f i)`. -/
def map {α β} (f : α → β) (g : Poly α) : Poly β :=
⟨fun v => g <| v ∘ f, Poly.induction (C := fun g => IsPoly (fun v => g (v ∘ f)))
(fun i => by simpa using IsPoly.proj _) (fun n => by simpa using IsPoly.const _)
(fun f g pf pg => by simpa using IsPoly.sub pf pg)
(fun f g pf pg => by simpa using IsPoly.mul pf pg) _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_apply {α β} (f : α → β) (g : Poly α) (v) : map f g v = g (v ∘ f) := rfl
end Poly
end Polynomials
/-! ### Diophantine sets -/
/-- A set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on
`α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`. -/
def Dioph {α : Type u} (S : Set (α → ℕ)) : Prop :=
∃ (β : Type u) (p : Poly (α ⊕ β)), ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0
namespace Dioph
section
variable {α β γ : Type u} {S S' : Set (α → ℕ)}
theorem ext (d : Dioph S) (H : ∀ v, v ∈ S ↔ v ∈ S') : Dioph S' := by rwa [← Set.ext H]
theorem of_no_dummies (S : Set (α → ℕ)) (p : Poly α) (h : ∀ v, S v ↔ p v = 0) : Dioph S :=
⟨PEmpty, ⟨p.map inl, fun v => (h v).trans ⟨fun h => ⟨PEmpty.elim, h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht⟩⟩⟩
theorem inject_dummies_lem (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ x, g (f x) = some x)
(p : Poly (α ⊕ β)) (v : α → ℕ) :
(∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0) ↔ ∃ t, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) (v ⊗ t) = 0 := by
dsimp; refine ⟨fun t => ?_, fun t => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := t
· have : (v ⊗ (0 ::ₒ t) ∘ g) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) = v ⊗ t :=
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> dsimp [(· ∘ ·)]; try rw [inv]; rfl
exact ⟨(0 ::ₒ t) ∘ g, by rwa [this]⟩
· have : v ⊗ t ∘ f = (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f) := funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl
exact ⟨t ∘ f, by rwa [this]⟩
theorem inject_dummies (f : β → γ) (g : γ → Option β) (inv : ∀ x, g (f x) = some x)
(p : Poly (α ⊕ β)) (h : ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, p (v ⊗ t) = 0) :
∃ q : Poly (α ⊕ γ), ∀ v, S v ↔ ∃ t, q (v ⊗ t) = 0 :=
⟨p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ f), fun v => (h v).trans <| inject_dummies_lem f g inv _ _⟩
variable (β) in
theorem reindex_dioph (f : α → β) : Dioph S → Dioph {v | v ∘ f ∈ S}
| ⟨γ, p, pe⟩ => ⟨γ, p.map (inl ∘ f ⊗ inr), fun v =>
(pe _).trans <|
exists_congr fun t =>
suffices v ∘ f ⊗ t = (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ∘ f ⊗ inr) by simp [this]
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl⟩
theorem DiophList.forall (l : List (Set <| α → ℕ)) (d : l.Forall Dioph) :
Dioph {v | l.Forall fun S : Set (α → ℕ) => v ∈ S} := by
suffices ∃ (β : _) (pl : List (Poly (α ⊕ β))), ∀ v, List.Forall (fun S : Set _ => S v) l ↔
∃ t, List.Forall (fun p : Poly (α ⊕ β) => p (v ⊗ t) = 0) pl
from
let ⟨β, pl, h⟩ := this
⟨β, Poly.sumsq pl, fun v => (h v).trans <| exists_congr fun t => (Poly.sumsq_eq_zero _ _).symm⟩
induction l with | nil => exact ⟨ULift Empty, [], fun _ => by simp⟩ | cons S l IH =>
simp? at d says simp only [List.forall_cons] at d
exact
let ⟨⟨β, p, pe⟩, dl⟩ := d
let ⟨γ, pl, ple⟩ := IH dl
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl)::pl.map fun q => q.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr),
fun v => by
simp; exact
Iff.trans (and_congr (pe v) (ple v))
⟨fun ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m ⊗ n, by
rw [show (v ⊗ m ⊗ n) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) = v ⊗ m from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl]; exact hm, by
refine List.Forall.imp (fun q hq => ?_) hn; dsimp [Function.comp_def]
rw [show
(fun x : α ⊕ γ => (v ⊗ m ⊗ n) ((inl ⊗ fun x : γ => inr (inr x)) x)) = v ⊗ n
from funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl]; exact hq⟩,
fun ⟨t, hl, hr⟩ =>
⟨⟨t ∘ inl, by
rwa [show (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) = v ⊗ t ∘ inl from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl] at hl⟩,
⟨t ∘ inr, by
refine List.Forall.imp (fun q hq => ?_) hr; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at hq
rwa [show
(fun x : α ⊕ γ => (v ⊗ t) ((inl ⊗ fun x : γ => inr (inr x)) x)) =
v ⊗ t ∘ inr
from funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> rfl] at hq ⟩⟩⟩⟩
/-- Diophantine sets are closed under intersection. -/
theorem inter (d : Dioph S) (d' : Dioph S') : Dioph (S ∩ S') := DiophList.forall [S, S'] ⟨d, d'⟩
/-- Diophantine sets are closed under union. -/
theorem union : ∀ (_ : Dioph S) (_ : Dioph S'), Dioph (S ∪ S')
| ⟨β, p, pe⟩, ⟨γ, q, qe⟩ =>
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) * q.map (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr), fun v => by
refine
Iff.trans (or_congr ((pe v).trans ?_) ((qe v).trans ?_))
(exists_or.symm.trans
(exists_congr fun t =>
(@mul_eq_zero _ _ _ (p ((v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl)))
(q ((v ⊗ t) ∘ (inl ⊗ inr ∘ inr)))).symm))
· -- Porting note: putting everything on the same line fails
refine inject_dummies_lem _ (some ⊗ fun _ => none) ?_ _ _
exact fun _ => by simp only [elim_inl]
· -- Porting note: putting everything on the same line fails
refine inject_dummies_lem _ ((fun _ => none) ⊗ some) ?_ _ _
exact fun _ => by simp only [elim_inr]⟩
/-- A partial function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def DiophPFun (f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ) : Prop :=
Dioph {v : Option α → ℕ | f.graph (v ∘ some, v none)}
/-- A function is Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine. -/
def DiophFn (f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ) : Prop :=
Dioph {v : Option α → ℕ | f (v ∘ some) = v none}
theorem reindex_diophFn {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (g : α → β) (d : DiophFn f) :
DiophFn fun v => f (v ∘ g) := by convert reindex_dioph (Option β) (Option.map g) d
theorem ex_dioph {S : Set (α ⊕ β → ℕ)} : Dioph S → Dioph {v | ∃ x, v ⊗ x ∈ S}
| ⟨γ, p, pe⟩ =>
⟨β ⊕ γ, p.map ((inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) ⊗ inr ∘ inr), fun v =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := (pe _).1 hx
⟨x ⊗ t, by
simp; rw [show (v ⊗ x ⊗ t) ∘ ((inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) ⊗ inr ∘ inr) = (v ⊗ x) ⊗ t from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> try { cases a <;> rfl }; rfl]
exact ht⟩,
fun ⟨t, ht⟩ =>
⟨t ∘ inl,
(pe _).2
⟨t ∘ inr, by
simp only [Poly.map_apply] at ht
rwa [show (v ⊗ t) ∘ ((inl ⊗ inr ∘ inl) ⊗ inr ∘ inr) = (v ⊗ t ∘ inl) ⊗ t ∘ inr from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> try { cases a <;> rfl }; rfl] at ht⟩⟩⟩⟩
theorem ex1_dioph {S : Set (Option α → ℕ)} : Dioph S → Dioph {v | ∃ x, x ::ₒ v ∈ S}
| ⟨β, p, pe⟩ =>
⟨Option β, p.map (inr none ::ₒ inl ⊗ inr ∘ some), fun v =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := (pe _).1 hx
⟨x ::ₒ t, by
simp only [Poly.map_apply]
rw [show (v ⊗ x ::ₒ t) ∘ (inr none ::ₒ inl ⊗ inr ∘ some) = x ::ₒ v ⊗ t from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> try { cases a <;> rfl}; rfl]
exact ht⟩,
fun ⟨t, ht⟩ =>
⟨t none,
(pe _).2
⟨t ∘ some, by
simp only [Poly.map_apply] at ht
rwa [show (v ⊗ t) ∘ (inr none ::ₒ inl ⊗ inr ∘ some) = t none ::ₒ v ⊗ t ∘ some from
funext fun s => by rcases s with a | b <;> try { cases a <;> rfl }; rfl] at ht ⟩⟩⟩⟩
theorem dom_dioph {f : (α → ℕ) →. ℕ} (d : DiophPFun f) : Dioph f.Dom :=
cast (congr_arg Dioph <| Set.ext fun _ => (PFun.dom_iff_graph _ _).symm) (ex1_dioph d)
theorem diophFn_iff_pFun (f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ) : DiophFn f = @DiophPFun α f := by
refine congr_arg Dioph (Set.ext fun v => ?_); exact PFun.lift_graph.symm
theorem abs_poly_dioph (p : Poly α) : DiophFn fun v => (p v).natAbs :=
of_no_dummies _ ((p.map some - Poly.proj none) * (p.map some + Poly.proj none))
fun v => (by dsimp; exact Int.natAbs_eq_iff_mul_eq_zero)
theorem proj_dioph (i : α) : DiophFn fun v => v i :=
abs_poly_dioph (Poly.proj i)
theorem diophPFun_comp1 {S : Set (Option α → ℕ)} (d : Dioph S) {f} (df : DiophPFun f) :
Dioph {v : α → ℕ | ∃ h : f.Dom v, f.fn v h ::ₒ v ∈ S} :=
ext (ex1_dioph (d.inter df)) fun v =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hS, (h : Exists _)⟩ => by
rw [show (x ::ₒ v) ∘ some = v from funext fun s => rfl] at h
obtain ⟨hf, h⟩ := h; refine ⟨hf, ?_⟩; rw [PFun.fn, h]; exact hS,
fun ⟨x, hS⟩ =>
⟨f.fn v x, hS, show Exists _ by
rw [show (f.fn v x ::ₒ v) ∘ some = v from funext fun s => rfl]; exact ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem diophFn_comp1 {S : Set (Option α → ℕ)} (d : Dioph S) {f : (α → ℕ) → ℕ} (df : DiophFn f) :
Dioph {v | f v ::ₒ v ∈ S} :=
ext (diophPFun_comp1 d <| cast (diophFn_iff_pFun f) df)
fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨trivial, h⟩⟩
end
| section
variable {α : Type} {n : ℕ}
open Vector3
open scoped Vector3
theorem diophFn_vec_comp1 {S : Set (Vector3 ℕ (succ n))} (d : Dioph S) {f : Vector3 ℕ n → ℕ}
(df : DiophFn f) : Dioph {v : Vector3 ℕ n | (f v::v) ∈ S} :=
Dioph.ext (diophFn_comp1 (reindex_dioph _ (none::some) d) df) (fun v => by
dsimp
-- Porting note: `congr` used to be enough here
suffices ((f v ::ₒ v) ∘ none :: some) = f v :: v by rw [this]; rfl
ext x; cases x <;> rfl)
/-- Deleting the first component preserves the Diophantine property. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Dioph.lean | 429 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Left Homology of short complexes
Given a short complex `S : ShortComplex C`, which consists of two composable
maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`, we shall define
here the "left homology" `S.leftHomology` of `S`. For this, we introduce the
notion of "left homology data". Such an `h : S.LeftHomologyData` consists of the
data of morphisms `i : K ⟶ X₂` and `π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies
`K` with the kernel of `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃`, and that `π` identifies `H` with the cokernel
of the induced map `f' : X₁ ⟶ K`.
When such a `S.LeftHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasLeftHomology]`
and we define `S.leftHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen left homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.cycles` to be the `K` field.
The dual notion is defined in `RightHomologyData.lean`. In `Homology.lean`,
when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data (i.e. they give
the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define `[S.HasHomology]`
and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` and
`π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies `K` to the kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`,
and that `π` identifies `H` to the cokernel of the induced map `f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
structure LeftHomologyData where
/-- a choice of kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
K : C
/-- a choice of cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
H : C
/-- the inclusion of cycles in `S.X₂` -/
i : K ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the projection from cycles to the (left) homology -/
π : K ⟶ H
/-- the kernel condition for `i` -/
wi : i ≫ S.g = 0
/-- `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` is a kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi)
/-- the cokernel condition for `π` -/
wπ : hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι _ S.zero) ≫ π = 0
/-- `π : K ⟶ H` is a cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ π wπ)
initialize_simps_projections LeftHomologyData (-hi, -hπ)
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- The chosen kernels and cokernels of the limits API give a `LeftHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kernel S.g
H := cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)
i := kernel.ι _
π := cokernel.π _
wi := kernel.condition _
hi := kernelIsKernel _
wπ := cokernel.condition _
hπ := cokernelIsCokernel _
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wi wπ
variable {S}
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Mono h.i := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hi⟩
instance : Epi h.π := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hπ⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` that is a cycle (i.e. `k ≫ S.g = 0`) lifts
to a morphism `A ⟶ K` -/
def liftK (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.K := h.hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftK_i (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : h.liftK k hk ≫ h.i = k :=
h.hi.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.zero
/-- The (left) homology class `A ⟶ H` attached to a cycle `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` -/
@[simp]
def liftH (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.H := h.liftK k hk ≫ h.π
/-- Given `h : LeftHomologyData S`, this is morphism `S.X₁ ⟶ h.K` induced
by `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the fact that `h.K` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K := h.liftK S.f S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_i : h.f' ≫ h.i = S.f := liftK_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_π : h.f' ≫ h.π = 0 := h.wπ
@[reassoc]
lemma liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
h.liftK k (by rw [hx, assoc, S.zero, comp_zero]) ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = (x ≫ h.f') ≫ h.π by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, hx, liftK_i, assoc, f'_i]
/-- For `h : S.LeftHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hπ`, saying that
`π : h.K ⟶ h.H` is a cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
def hπ' : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ h.π h.f'_π) := h.hπ
/-- The morphism `H ⟶ A` induced by a morphism `k : K ⟶ A` such that `f' ≫ k = 0` -/
def descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.hπ.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.π ≫ h.descH k hk = k :=
h.hπ.fac (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk) WalkingParallelPair.one
lemma isIso_i (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.i :=
⟨h.liftK (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hg, id_comp]),
by simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, id_comp, assoc, liftK_i, comp_id], liftK_i _ _ _⟩
lemma isIso_π (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.π := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' h.hπ' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_mono h.i, comp_id, f'_i, zero_comp, hf])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, hφ, by rw [← cancel_epi h.π, reassoc_of% hφ, comp_id]⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := c.pt
i := 𝟙 _
π := c.π
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := CokernelCofork.condition _
hπ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).f' = S.f := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).i, f'_i,
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_i]
dsimp
rw [comp_id]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := c.pt
H := c.pt
i := c.ι
π := 𝟙 _
wi := KernelFork.condition _
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
wπ := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf])
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ (Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
(ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).i, f'_i, hf, zero_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a left homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
i := 𝟙 _
π := 𝟙 _
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := by
change S.f ≫ 𝟙 _ = 0
simp only [hf, zero_comp]
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
| @[simp] lemma ofZeros_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((ofZeros S hf hg).i), zero_comp, f'_i, hf]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/LeftHomology.lean | 209 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
| @[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 185 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
| /-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 917 | 921 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
/-! # Adjoining top/bottom elements to ordered monoids.
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Function
namespace WithTop
instance isOrderedAddMonoid [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] :
IsOrderedAddMonoid (WithTop α) where
add_le_add_left _ _ := add_le_add_left
instance canonicallyOrderedAdd [Add α] [Preorder α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α] :
CanonicallyOrderedAdd (WithTop α) :=
{ WithTop.existsAddOfLE with
le_self_add := fun a b =>
match a, b with
| ⊤, ⊤ => le_rfl
| (a : α), ⊤ => le_top
| (a : α), (b : α) => WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add
| ⊤, (b : α) => le_rfl }
end WithTop
namespace WithBot
instance isOrderedAddMonoid [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] :
IsOrderedAddMonoid (WithBot α) :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun _ _ h c => add_le_add_left h c }
protected theorem le_self_add [Add α] [LE α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
{x : WithBot α} (hx : x ≠ ⊥) (y : WithBot α) :
y ≤ y + x := by
induction x
· simp at hx
induction y
· simp
· rw [← WithBot.coe_add, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
exact le_self_add
protected theorem le_add_self [AddCommMagma α] [LE α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]
{x : WithBot α} (hx : x ≠ ⊥) (y : WithBot α) :
y ≤ x + y := by
induction x
· simp at hx
induction y
· simp
· rw [← WithBot.coe_add, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
exact le_add_self
end WithBot
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/WithTop.lean | 143 | 144 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Map
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# modular equivalence for submodule
-/
open Submodule
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R]
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (U U₁ U₂ : Submodule R M)
variable {x x₁ x₂ y y₁ y₂ z z₁ z₂ : M}
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] (V V₁ V₂ : Submodule R N)
/-- A predicate saying two elements of a module are equivalent modulo a submodule. -/
def SModEq (x y : M) : Prop :=
(Submodule.Quotient.mk x : M ⧸ U) = Submodule.Quotient.mk y
@[inherit_doc] notation:50 x " ≡ " y " [SMOD " N "]" => SModEq N x y
variable {U U₁ U₂}
protected theorem SModEq.def :
x ≡ y [SMOD U] ↔ (Submodule.Quotient.mk x : M ⧸ U) = Submodule.Quotient.mk y :=
Iff.rfl
namespace SModEq
theorem sub_mem : x ≡ y [SMOD U] ↔ x - y ∈ U := by rw [SModEq.def, Submodule.Quotient.eq]
@[simp]
| theorem top : x ≡ y [SMOD (⊤ : Submodule R M)] :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/SModEq.lean | 42 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
/-- Although `fun x => x ^ r` for fixed `r` is *not* complex-differentiable along the negative real
line, it is still real-differentiable, and the derivative is what one would formally expect.
See `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const` for an alternate formulation. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ -1) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← Ne] at hr
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hx.symm with (hx | hx)
· -- easy case : `0 < x`
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (e := fun y => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1))
convert HasDerivAt.div_const (𝕜 := ℂ) ?_ (r + 1) using 1
· exact (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr).symm
· convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
· -- harder case : `x < 0`
have : ∀ᶠ y : ℝ in 𝓝 x,
(y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) = (-y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) * exp (π * I * (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
refine Filter.eventually_of_mem (Iio_mem_nhds hx) fun y hy => ?_
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hy)]
refine HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hx)]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-↑y) ^ (r + 1) * exp (↑π * I * (r + 1)))
((r + 1) * (-↑x) ^ r * exp (↑π * I * r)) x by
convert this.div_const (r + 1) using 1
conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr]
rw [mul_add ((π : ℂ) * _), mul_one, exp_add, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) (-1 : ℂ),
neg_one_mul]
simp_rw [mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← ofReal_neg]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (↑(-y) : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) (-(r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) x by
convert this.neg.mul_const _ using 1; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) (-x) by
convert @HasDerivAt.scomp ℝ _ ℂ _ _ x ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this (hasDerivAt_neg x) using 1
rw [real_smul, ofReal_neg 1, ofReal_one]; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) ↑(-x) by
exact this.comp_ofReal
conv in ↑_ ^ _ => rw [(by ring : r = r + 1 - 1)]
convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id ((-x : ℝ) : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-15")] alias hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow := hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'
/-- An alternate formulation of `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ r) (r * x ^ (r - 1)) x := by
have := HasDerivAt.const_mul r <| hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' hx
(by rwa [ne_eq, sub_eq_neg_self])
simpa [sub_add_cancel, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr] using this
/-- A version of `DifferentiableAt.cpow_const` for a real function. -/
theorem DifferentiableAt.ofReal_cpow_const {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h0 : f x ≠ 0) (h1 : c ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun (y : ℝ) => (f y : ℂ) ^ c) x :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const h0 h1).differentiableAt.comp x hf
theorem Complex.deriv_cpow_const (hx : x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ x ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const hx).hasDerivAt.deriv
/-- A version of `Complex.deriv_cpow_const` for a real variable. -/
theorem Complex.deriv_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc).deriv
theorem deriv_cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hx : f x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ f x ^ c) x = c * f x ^ (c - 1) * deriv f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.cpow_const hx).deriv
theorem isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =Θ[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
calc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ c * x ^ (c - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with x hx using by rw [deriv_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ ‖(x : ℂ) ^ (c - 1)‖ :=
(Asymptotics.IsTheta.of_norm_eventuallyEq EventuallyEq.rfl).const_mul_left hc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x ↦ x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re]
theorem isBigO_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop (c : ℂ) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· simp_rw [cpow_zero, deriv_const', Asymptotics.isBigO_zero]
· exact (isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop hc).1
end deriv
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is strictly differentiable at `p : ℝ × ℝ` such that `0 < p.fst`. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : 0 < p.1) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℝ ℝ ℝ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℝ ℝ ℝ) p := by
have : (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
(continuousAt_fst.eventually (lt_mem_nhds hp)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_pos hp _
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
convert ((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.log hp.ne').mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).exp using 1
rw [rpow_sub_one hp.ne', ← rpow_def_of_pos hp, smul_add, smul_smul, mul_div_left_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv, smul_smul, smul_smul, mul_assoc, add_comm]
/-- `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is strictly differentiable at `p : ℝ × ℝ` such that `p.fst < 0`. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 < 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℝ ℝ ℝ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1 - exp (log p.1 * p.2) * sin (p.2 * π) * π) •
ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℝ ℝ ℝ) p := by
have : (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) * cos (x.2 * π) :=
(continuousAt_fst.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hp)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_neg hp _
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
convert ((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.log hp.ne).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).exp.mul
(hasStrictFDerivAt_snd.mul_const π).cos using 1
simp_rw [rpow_sub_one hp.ne, smul_add, ← add_assoc, smul_smul, ← add_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm (cos _), ← rpow_def_of_neg hp]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_comm]; congr 2 <;> ring
/-- The function `fun (x, y) => x ^ y` is infinitely smooth at `(x, y)` unless `x = 0`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 ≠ 0) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 ^ p.2) p := by
rcases hp.lt_or_lt with hneg | hpos
exacts
[(((contDiffAt_fst.log hneg.ne).mul contDiffAt_snd).exp.mul
(contDiffAt_snd.mul contDiffAt_const).cos).congr_of_eventuallyEq
((continuousAt_fst.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hneg)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_neg hp _),
((contDiffAt_fst.log hpos.ne').mul contDiffAt_snd).exp.congr_of_eventuallyEq
((continuousAt_fst.eventually (lt_mem_nhds hpos)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_pos hp _)]
theorem differentiableAt_rpow_of_ne (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 ^ p.2) p :=
(contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne p hp).differentiableAt le_rfl
theorem _root_.HasStrictDerivAt.rpow {f g : ℝ → ℝ} {f' g' : ℝ} (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) (h : 0 < f x) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(f' * g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) + g' * f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) x := by
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
(hf.prodMk hg) using 1
simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (p : ℝ) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => x ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) x := by
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· have := (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (x, p) hx).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).prodMk (hasStrictDerivAt_const x p))
convert this using 1; simp
· simpa using (hasStrictDerivAt_id x).rpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x p) hx
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (x : ℝ) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => a ^ x) (a ^ x * log a) x := by
simpa using (hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).rpow (hasStrictDerivAt_id x) ha
lemma differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne (p : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => x ^ p) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx p).differentiableAt
lemma differentiableOn_rpow_const (p : ℝ) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => (x : ℝ) ^ p) {0}ᶜ :=
fun _ hx => (Real.differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne p hx).differentiableWithinAt
/-- This lemma says that `fun x => a ^ x` is strictly differentiable for `a < 0`. Note that these
values of `a` are outside of the "official" domain of `a ^ x`, and we may redefine `a ^ x`
for negative `a` if some other definition will be more convenient. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow_of_neg {a x : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => a ^ x) (a ^ x * log a - exp (log a * x) * sin (x * π) * π) x := by
simpa using (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (a, x) ha).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
((hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).prodMk (hasStrictDerivAt_id _))
end Real
namespace Real
variable {z x y : ℝ}
theorem hasDerivAt_rpow_const {x p : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => x ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) x := by
rcases ne_or_eq x 0 with (hx | rfl)
· exact (hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx _).hasDerivAt
replace h : 1 ≤ p := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
apply hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne fun x hx =>
(hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx p).hasDerivAt
exacts [continuousAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr (zero_le_one.trans h)),
continuousAt_const.mul (continuousAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr (sub_nonneg.2 h)))]
theorem differentiable_rpow_const {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) : Differentiable ℝ fun x : ℝ => x ^ p :=
fun _ => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inr hp)).differentiableAt
theorem deriv_rpow_const {x p : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
deriv (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) x = p * x ^ (p - 1) :=
(hasDerivAt_rpow_const h).deriv
theorem deriv_rpow_const' {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
(deriv fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) = fun x => p * x ^ (p - 1) :=
funext fun _ => deriv_rpow_const (Or.inr h)
theorem contDiffAt_rpow_const_of_ne {x p : ℝ} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (h : x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => x ^ p) x :=
(contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne (x, p) h).comp x (contDiffAt_id.prodMk contDiffAt_const)
theorem contDiff_rpow_const_of_le {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n ≤ p) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x : ℝ => x ^ p := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing p
· exact contDiff_zero.2 (continuous_id.rpow_const fun x => Or.inr <| by simpa using h)
· have h1 : 1 ≤ p := le_trans (by simp) h
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← le_sub_iff_add_le] at h
rw [show ((n + 1 : ℕ) : WithTop ℕ∞) = n + 1 from rfl,
contDiff_succ_iff_deriv, deriv_rpow_const' h1]
simp only [WithTop.natCast_ne_top, analyticOn_univ, IsEmpty.forall_iff, true_and]
exact ⟨differentiable_rpow_const h1, contDiff_const.mul (ihn h)⟩
theorem contDiffAt_rpow_const_of_le {x p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n ≤ p) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) x :=
(contDiff_rpow_const_of_le h).contDiffAt
theorem contDiffAt_rpow_const {x p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ ↑n ≤ p) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) x :=
h.elim contDiffAt_rpow_const_of_ne contDiffAt_rpow_const_of_le
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const {x p : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => x ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) x :=
ContDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt' (contDiffAt_rpow_const (by rwa [← Nat.cast_one] at hx))
(hasDerivAt_rpow_const hx) le_rfl
end Real
section Differentiability
open Real
section fderiv
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {f g : E → ℝ} {f' g' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c p : ℝ} {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to deal with unification issues. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.rpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h : 0 < f x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
exact (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos (f x, g x) h).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.rpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) (h : 0 < f x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) • g') x := by
exact (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos (f x, g x) h).hasFDerivAt.comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.rpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h : 0 < f x) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos (f x, g x) h).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to deal with unification issues. -/
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.rpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ g s x) (h : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x := by
exact (differentiableAt_rpow_of_ne (f x, g x) h).comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hf.prodMk hg)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to deal with unification issues. -/
theorem DifferentiableAt.rpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x)
(h : f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x := by
exact (differentiableAt_rpow_of_ne (f x, g x) h).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem DifferentiableOn.rpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℝ g s)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).rpow (hg x hx) (h x hx)
theorem Differentiable.rpow (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hg : Differentiable ℝ g) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => f x ^ g x := fun x => (hf x).rpow (hg x) (h x)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.rpow_const (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h : f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ p) ((p * f x ^ (p - 1)) • f') s x :=
(hasDerivAt_rpow_const h).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.rpow_const (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h : f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ p) ((p * f x ^ (p - 1)) • f') x :=
(hasDerivAt_rpow_const h).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.rpow_const (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h : f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ p) ((p * f x ^ (p - 1)) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const h).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.rpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(h : f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => f x ^ p) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.rpow_const h).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem DifferentiableAt.rpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (h : f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => f x ^ p) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.rpow_const h).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.rpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => f x ^ p) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).rpow_const (h x hx)
theorem Differentiable.rpow_const (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => f x ^ p := fun x => (hf x).rpow_const (h x)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_rpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hc : 0 < c) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Real.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow hc (f x)).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_rpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hc : 0 < c) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Real.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow hc (f x)).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_rpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hc : 0 < c) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Real.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow hc (f x)).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to deal with unification issues. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.rpow (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x)
(h : f x ≠ 0) : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x := by
exact (contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne (f x, g x) h).comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf.prodMk hg)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
added `by exact` to deal with unification issues. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.rpow (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) (h : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ g x) x := by
exact (contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne (f x, g x) h).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem ContDiffOn.rpow (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ g x) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).rpow (hg x hx) (h x hx)
theorem ContDiff.rpow (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => f x ^ g x :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun x => hf.contDiffAt.rpow hg.contDiffAt (h x)
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.rpow_const_of_ne (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (h : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ p) s x :=
hf.rpow contDiffWithinAt_const h
theorem ContDiffAt.rpow_const_of_ne (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (h : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ p) x :=
hf.rpow contDiffAt_const h
theorem ContDiffOn.rpow_const_of_ne (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => f x ^ p) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).rpow_const_of_ne (h x hx)
theorem ContDiff.rpow_const_of_ne (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => f x ^ p :=
hf.rpow contDiff_const h
variable {m : ℕ}
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.rpow_const_of_le (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ m f s x) (h : ↑m ≤ p) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ m (fun x => f x ^ p) s x :=
(contDiffAt_rpow_const_of_le h).comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
theorem ContDiffAt.rpow_const_of_le (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ m f x) (h : ↑m ≤ p) :
ContDiffAt ℝ m (fun x => f x ^ p) x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_univ] at *; exact hf.rpow_const_of_le h
theorem ContDiffOn.rpow_const_of_le (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ m f s) (h : ↑m ≤ p) :
ContDiffOn ℝ m (fun x => f x ^ p) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).rpow_const_of_le h
theorem ContDiff.rpow_const_of_le (hf : ContDiff ℝ m f) (h : ↑m ≤ p) :
ContDiff ℝ m fun x => f x ^ p :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _ => hf.contDiffAt.rpow_const_of_le h
end fderiv
section deriv
variable {f g : ℝ → ℝ} {f' g' x y p : ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.rpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h : 0 < f x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
| (f' * g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) + g' * f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) s x := by
convert (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.rpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h).hasDerivWithinAt using 1
dsimp; ring
theorem HasDerivAt.rpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x) (h : 0 < f x) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 592 | 596 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Short
/-!
# Games described via "the state of the board".
We provide a simple mechanism for constructing combinatorial (pre-)games, by describing
"the state of the board", and providing an upper bound on the number of turns remaining.
## Implementation notes
We're very careful to produce a computable definition, so small games can be evaluated
using `decide`. To achieve this, I've had to rely solely on induction on natural numbers:
relying on general well-foundedness seems to be poisonous to computation?
See `SetTheory/Game/Domineering` for an example using this construction.
-/
universe u
namespace SetTheory
namespace PGame
/-- `SetTheory.PGame.State S` describes how to interpret `s : S` as a state of a combinatorial game.
Use `SetTheory.PGame.ofState s` or `SetTheory.Game.ofState s` to construct the game.
`SetTheory.PGame.State.l : S → Finset S` and `SetTheory.PGame.State.r : S → Finset S` describe
the states reachable by a move by Left or Right. `SetTheory.PGame.State.turnBound : S → ℕ`
gives an upper bound on the number of possible turns remaining from this state.
-/
class State (S : Type u) where
/-- Upper bound on the number of possible turns remaining from this state -/
turnBound : S → ℕ
/-- States reachable by a Left move -/
l : S → Finset S
/-- States reachable by a Right move -/
r : S → Finset S
left_bound : ∀ {s t : S}, t ∈ l s → turnBound t < turnBound s
right_bound : ∀ {s t : S}, t ∈ r s → turnBound t < turnBound s
open State
variable {S : Type u} [State S]
theorem turnBound_ne_zero_of_left_move {s t : S} (m : t ∈ l s) : turnBound s ≠ 0 := by
intro h
have t := left_bound m
rw [h] at t
exact Nat.not_succ_le_zero _ t
theorem turnBound_ne_zero_of_right_move {s t : S} (m : t ∈ r s) : turnBound s ≠ 0 := by
| intro h
have t := right_bound m
rw [h] at t
exact Nat.not_succ_le_zero _ t
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/State.lean | 57 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.LocPathConnected
/-!
# Charted spaces
A smooth manifold is a topological space `M` locally modelled on a euclidean space (or a euclidean
half-space for manifolds with boundaries, or an infinite dimensional vector space for more general
notions of manifolds), i.e., the manifold is covered by open subsets on which there are local
homeomorphisms (the charts) going to a model space `H`, and the changes of charts should be smooth
maps.
In this file, we introduce a general framework describing these notions, where the model space is an
arbitrary topological space. We avoid the word *manifold*, which should be reserved for the
situation where the model space is a (subset of a) vector space, and use the terminology
*charted space* instead.
If the changes of charts satisfy some additional property (for instance if they are smooth), then
`M` inherits additional structure (it makes sense to talk about smooth manifolds). There are
therefore two different ingredients in a charted space:
* the set of charts, which is data
* the fact that changes of charts belong to some group (in fact groupoid), which is additional Prop.
We separate these two parts in the definition: the charted space structure is just the set of
charts, and then the different smoothness requirements (smooth manifold, orientable manifold,
contact manifold, and so on) are additional properties of these charts. These properties are
formalized through the notion of structure groupoid, i.e., a set of partial homeomorphisms stable
under composition and inverse, to which the change of coordinates should belong.
## Main definitions
* `StructureGroupoid H` : a subset of partial homeomorphisms of `H` stable under composition,
inverse and restriction (ex: partial diffeomorphisms).
* `continuousGroupoid H` : the groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms of `H`.
* `ChartedSpace H M` : charted space structure on `M` modelled on `H`, given by an atlas of
partial homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` whose sources cover `M`. This is a type class.
* `HasGroupoid M G` : when `G` is a structure groupoid on `H` and `M` is a charted space
modelled on `H`, require that all coordinate changes belong to `G`. This is a type class.
* `atlas H M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H`, the atlas of this charted
space structure, i.e., the set of charts.
* `G.maximalAtlas M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H` and admitting `G` as a
structure groupoid, one can consider all the partial homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` such that
changing coordinate from any chart to them belongs to `G`. This is a larger atlas, called the
maximal atlas (for the groupoid `G`).
* `Structomorph G M M'` : the type of diffeomorphisms between the charted spaces `M` and `M'` for
the groupoid `G`. We avoid the word diffeomorphism, keeping it for the smooth category.
As a basic example, we give the instance
`instance chartedSpaceSelf (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : ChartedSpace H H`
saying that a topological space is a charted space over itself, with the identity as unique chart.
This charted space structure is compatible with any groupoid.
Additional useful definitions:
* `Pregroupoid H` : a subset of partial maps of `H` stable under composition and
restriction, but not inverse (ex: smooth maps)
* `Pregroupoid.groupoid` : construct a groupoid from a pregroupoid, by requiring that a map and
its inverse both belong to the pregroupoid (ex: construct diffeos from smooth maps)
* `chartAt H x` is a preferred chart at `x : M` when `M` has a charted space structure modelled on
`H`.
* `G.compatible he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the atlas, the composition
of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the groupoid `G` when `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `G.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the
maximal atlas associated to the groupoid `G`, the composition of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the
`G` if `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `ChartedSpaceCore.toChartedSpace`: consider a space without a topology, but endowed with a set
of charts (which are partial equivs) for which the change of coordinates are partial homeos.
Then one can construct a topology on the space for which the charts become partial homeos,
defining a genuine charted space structure.
## Implementation notes
The atlas in a charted space is *not* a maximal atlas in general: the notion of maximality depends
on the groupoid one considers, and changing groupoids changes the maximal atlas. With the current
formalization, it makes sense first to choose the atlas, and then to ask whether this precise atlas
defines a smooth manifold, an orientable manifold, and so on. A consequence is that structomorphisms
between `M` and `M'` do *not* induce a bijection between the atlases of `M` and `M'`: the
definition is only that, read in charts, the structomorphism locally belongs to the groupoid under
consideration. (This is equivalent to inducing a bijection between elements of the maximal atlas).
A consequence is that the invariance under structomorphisms of properties defined in terms of the
atlas is not obvious in general, and could require some work in theory (amounting to the fact
that these properties only depend on the maximal atlas, for instance). In practice, this does not
create any real difficulty.
We use the letter `H` for the model space thinking of the case of manifolds with boundary, where the
model space is a half space.
Manifolds are sometimes defined as topological spaces with an atlas of local diffeomorphisms, and
sometimes as spaces with an atlas from which a topology is deduced. We use the former approach:
otherwise, there would be an instance from manifolds to topological spaces, which means that any
instance search for topological spaces would try to find manifold structures involving a yet
unknown model space, leading to problems. However, we also introduce the latter approach,
through a structure `ChartedSpaceCore` making it possible to construct a topology out of a set of
partial equivs with compatibility conditions (but we do not register it as an instance).
In the definition of a charted space, the model space is written as an explicit parameter as there
can be several model spaces for a given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold
(modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen sometimes as a real manifold modelled over `ℝ^(2n)`.
## Notations
In the locale `Manifold`, we denote the composition of partial homeomorphisms with `≫ₕ`, and the
composition of partial equivs with `≫`.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace Topology
universe u
variable {H : Type u} {H' : Type*} {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M'' : Type*}
/- Notational shortcut for the composition of partial homeomorphisms and partial equivs, i.e.,
`PartialHomeomorph.trans` and `PartialEquiv.trans`.
Note that, as is usual for equivs, the composition is from left to right, hence the direction of
the arrow. -/
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ₕ " => PartialHomeomorph.trans
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ " => PartialEquiv.trans
open Set PartialHomeomorph Manifold -- Porting note: Added `Manifold`
/-! ### Structure groupoids -/
section Groupoid
/-! One could add to the definition of a structure groupoid the fact that the restriction of an
element of the groupoid to any open set still belongs to the groupoid.
(This is in Kobayashi-Nomizu.)
I am not sure I want this, for instance on `H × E` where `E` is a vector space, and the groupoid is
made of functions respecting the fibers and linear in the fibers (so that a charted space over this
groupoid is naturally a vector bundle) I prefer that the members of the groupoid are always
defined on sets of the form `s × E`. There is a typeclass `ClosedUnderRestriction` for groupoids
which have the restriction property.
The only nontrivial requirement is locality: if a partial homeomorphism belongs to the groupoid
around each point in its domain of definition, then it belongs to the groupoid. Without this
requirement, the composition of structomorphisms does not have to be a structomorphism. Note that
this implies that a partial homeomorphism with empty source belongs to any structure groupoid, as
it trivially satisfies this condition.
There is also a technical point, related to the fact that a partial homeomorphism is by definition a
global map which is a homeomorphism when restricted to its source subset (and its values outside
of the source are not relevant). Therefore, we also require that being a member of the groupoid only
depends on the values on the source.
We use primes in the structure names as we will reformulate them below (without primes) using a
`Membership` instance, writing `e ∈ G` instead of `e ∈ G.members`.
-/
/-- A structure groupoid is a set of partial homeomorphisms of a topological space stable under
composition and inverse. They appear in the definition of the smoothness class of a manifold. -/
structure StructureGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] where
/-- Members of the structure groupoid are partial homeomorphisms. -/
members : Set (PartialHomeomorph H H)
/-- Structure groupoids are stable under composition. -/
trans' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ∈ members → e ≫ₕ e' ∈ members
/-- Structure groupoids are stable under inverse. -/
symm' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e.symm ∈ members
/-- The identity morphism lies in the structure groupoid. -/
id_mem' : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ members
/-- Let `e` be a partial homeomorphism. If for every `x ∈ e.source`, the restriction of e to some
open set around `x` lies in the groupoid, then `e` lies in the groupoid. -/
locality' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
(∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ members) → e ∈ members
/-- Membership in a structure groupoid respects the equivalence of partial homeomorphisms. -/
mem_of_eqOnSource' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ≈ e → e' ∈ members
variable [TopologicalSpace H]
instance : Membership (PartialHomeomorph H H) (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun (G : StructureGroupoid H) (e : PartialHomeomorph H H) ↦ e ∈ G.members⟩
instance (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] :
SetLike (StructureGroupoid H) (PartialHomeomorph H H) where
coe s := s.members
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr
instance : Min (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun G G' => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := G.members ∩ G'.members)
(trans' := fun e e' he he' =>
⟨G.trans' e e' he.left he'.left, G'.trans' e e' he.right he'.right⟩)
(symm' := fun e he => ⟨G.symm' e he.left, G'.symm' e he.right⟩)
(id_mem' := ⟨G.id_mem', G'.id_mem'⟩)
(locality' := by
intro e hx
apply (mem_inter_iff e G.members G'.members).mpr
refine And.intro (G.locality' e ?_) (G'.locality' e ?_)
all_goals
intro x hex
rcases hx x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
use s
refine And.intro hs.left (And.intro hs.right.left ?_)
· exact hs.right.right.left
· exact hs.right.right.right)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := fun e e' he hee' =>
⟨G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.left hee', G'.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.right hee'⟩)⟩
instance : InfSet (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun S => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := ⋂ s ∈ S, s.members)
(trans' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he' i hi
exact i.trans' e e' (he i hi) (he' i hi))
(symm' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
exact i.symm' e (he i hi))
(id_mem' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro i _
exact i.id_mem')
(locality' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
refine i.locality' e ?_
intro x hex
rcases he x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨hs.left, ⟨hs.right.left, hs.right.right i hi⟩⟩⟩)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he'e
exact fun i hi => i.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' (he i hi) he'e)⟩
theorem StructureGroupoid.trans (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (he' : e' ∈ G) : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
G.trans' e e' he he'
theorem StructureGroupoid.symm (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) :
e.symm ∈ G :=
G.symm' e he
theorem StructureGroupoid.id_mem (G : StructureGroupoid H) : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ G :=
G.id_mem'
theorem StructureGroupoid.locality (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(h : ∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ G) : e ∈ G :=
G.locality' e h
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (h : e' ≈ e) : e' ∈ G :=
G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he h
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_iff_of_eqOnSource {G : StructureGroupoid H}
{e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H} (h : e ≈ e') : e ∈ G ↔ e' ∈ G :=
⟨fun he ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he (Setoid.symm h), fun he' ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he' h⟩
/-- Partial order on the set of groupoids, given by inclusion of the members of the groupoid. -/
instance StructureGroupoid.partialOrder : PartialOrder (StructureGroupoid H) :=
PartialOrder.lift StructureGroupoid.members fun a b h ↦ by
cases a
cases b
dsimp at h
induction h
rfl
theorem StructureGroupoid.le_iff {G₁ G₂ : StructureGroupoid H} : G₁ ≤ G₂ ↔ ∀ e, e ∈ G₁ → e ∈ G₂ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The trivial groupoid, containing only the identity (and maps with empty source, as this is
necessary from the definition). -/
def idGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] : StructureGroupoid H where
members := {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ }
trans' e e' he he' := by
rcases he with he | he
· simpa only [mem_singleton_iff.1 he, refl_trans]
· have : (e ≫ₕ e').source ⊆ e.source := sep_subset _ _
rw [he] at this
have : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := eq_bot_iff.2 this
exact (mem_union _ _ _).2 (Or.inr this)
symm' e he := by
rcases (mem_union _ _ _).1 he with E | E
· simp [mem_singleton_iff.mp E]
· right
simpa only [e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target.symm, mfld_simps] using E
id_mem' := mem_union_left _ rfl
locality' e he := by
rcases e.source.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· right
exact h
· left
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases he x hx with ⟨s, open_s, xs, hs⟩
have x's : x ∈ (e.restr s).source := by
rw [restr_source, open_s.interior_eq]
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩
rcases hs with hs | hs
· replace hs : PartialHomeomorph.restr e s = PartialHomeomorph.refl H := by
simpa only using hs
have : (e.restr s).source = univ := by
rw [hs]
simp
have : e.toPartialEquiv.source ∩ interior s = univ := this
have : univ ⊆ interior s := by
rw [← this]
exact inter_subset_right
have : s = univ := by rwa [open_s.interior_eq, univ_subset_iff] at this
simpa only [this, restr_univ] using hs
· exfalso
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hs
rwa [hs] at x's
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he he'e := by
rcases he with he | he
· left
have : e = e' := by
refine eq_of_eqOnSource_univ (Setoid.symm he'e) ?_ ?_ <;>
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 he] <;> rfl
rwa [← this]
· right
have he : e.toPartialEquiv.source = ∅ := he
rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, EqOnSource.source_eq he'e]
/-- Every structure groupoid contains the identity groupoid. -/
instance instStructureGroupoidOrderBot : OrderBot (StructureGroupoid H) where
bot := idGroupoid H
bot_le := by
intro u f hf
have hf : f ∈ {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := hf
simp only [singleton_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_insert_iff] at hf
rcases hf with hf | hf
· rw [hf]
apply u.id_mem
· apply u.locality
intro x hx
rw [hf, mem_empty_iff_false] at hx
exact hx.elim
instance : Inhabited (StructureGroupoid H) := ⟨idGroupoid H⟩
/-- To construct a groupoid, one may consider classes of partial homeomorphisms such that
both the function and its inverse have some property. If this property is stable under composition,
one gets a groupoid. `Pregroupoid` bundles the properties needed for this construction, with the
groupoid of smooth functions with smooth inverses as an application. -/
structure Pregroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] where
/-- Property describing membership in this groupoid: the pregroupoid "contains"
all functions `H → H` having the pregroupoid property on some `s : Set H` -/
property : (H → H) → Set H → Prop
/-- The pregroupoid property is stable under composition -/
comp : ∀ {f g u v}, property f u → property g v →
IsOpen u → IsOpen v → IsOpen (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v) → property (g ∘ f) (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
/-- Pregroupoids contain the identity map (on `univ`) -/
id_mem : property id univ
/-- The pregroupoid property is "local", in the sense that `f` has the pregroupoid property on `u`
iff its restriction to each open subset of `u` has it -/
locality :
∀ {f u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, ∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ property f (u ∩ v)) → property f u
/-- If `f = g` on `u` and `property f u`, then `property g u` -/
congr : ∀ {f g : H → H} {u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, g x = f x) → property f u → property g u
/-- Construct a groupoid of partial homeos for which the map and its inverse have some property,
from a pregroupoid asserting that this property is stable under composition. -/
def Pregroupoid.groupoid (PG : Pregroupoid H) : StructureGroupoid H where
members := { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target }
trans' e e' he he' := by
constructor
· apply PG.comp he.1 he'.1 e.open_source e'.open_source
apply e.continuousOn_toFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_source e'.open_source
· apply PG.comp he'.2 he.2 e'.open_target e.open_target
apply e'.continuousOn_invFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e'.open_target e.open_target
symm' _ he := ⟨he.2, he.1⟩
id_mem' := ⟨PG.id_mem, PG.id_mem⟩
locality' e he := by
constructor
· refine PG.locality e.open_source fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he x xu with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, s_open, xs, ?_⟩
convert hs.1 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
· refine PG.locality e.open_target fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he (e.symm x) (e.map_target xu) with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s, ?_, ⟨xu, xs⟩, ?_⟩
· exact ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.continuousOn_invFun e.open_target s_open
· rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self]
convert hs.2 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he ee' := by
constructor
· apply PG.congr e'.open_source ee'.2
simp only [ee'.1, he.1]
· have A := EqOnSource.symm' ee'
apply PG.congr e'.symm.open_source A.2
-- Porting note: was
-- convert he.2
-- rw [A.1]
-- rfl
rw [A.1, symm_toPartialEquiv, PartialEquiv.symm_source]
exact he.2
theorem mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid {PG : Pregroupoid H} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} :
e ∈ PG.groupoid ↔ PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target :=
Iff.rfl
theorem groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le (PG₁ PG₂ : Pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀ f s, PG₁.property f s → PG₂.property f s) : PG₁.groupoid ≤ PG₂.groupoid := by
refine StructureGroupoid.le_iff.2 fun e he ↦ ?_
rw [mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid] at he ⊢
exact ⟨h _ _ he.1, h _ _ he.2⟩
theorem mem_pregroupoid_of_eqOnSource (PG : Pregroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he' : e ≈ e') (he : PG.property e e.source) : PG.property e' e'.source := by
rw [← he'.1]
exact PG.congr e.open_source he'.eqOn.symm he
/-- The pregroupoid of all partial maps on a topological space `H`. -/
abbrev continuousPregroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : Pregroupoid H where
property _ _ := True
comp _ _ _ _ _ := trivial
id_mem := trivial
locality _ _ := trivial
congr _ _ _ := trivial
instance (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : Inhabited (Pregroupoid H) :=
⟨continuousPregroupoid H⟩
/-- The groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms on a topological space `H`. -/
def continuousGroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (continuousPregroupoid H)
/-- Every structure groupoid is contained in the groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms. -/
instance instStructureGroupoidOrderTop : OrderTop (StructureGroupoid H) where
top := continuousGroupoid H
le_top _ _ _ := ⟨trivial, trivial⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (StructureGroupoid H) :=
{ SetLike.instPartialOrder,
completeLatticeOfInf _ (by
exact fun s =>
⟨fun S Ss F hF => mem_iInter₂.mp hF S Ss,
fun T Tl F fT => mem_iInter₂.mpr (fun i his => Tl his fT)⟩) with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
bot := instStructureGroupoidOrderBot.bot
bot_le := instStructureGroupoidOrderBot.bot_le
top := instStructureGroupoidOrderTop.top
le_top := instStructureGroupoidOrderTop.le_top
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁₂ h₁₃ _ hm ↦ ⟨h₁₂ hm, h₁₃ hm⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.right }
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if it contains all restrictions of its element local
homeomorphisms to open subsets of the source. -/
class ClosedUnderRestriction (G : StructureGroupoid H) : Prop where
closedUnderRestriction :
∀ {e : PartialHomeomorph H H}, e ∈ G → ∀ s : Set H, IsOpen s → e.restr s ∈ G
theorem closedUnderRestriction' {G : StructureGroupoid H} [ClosedUnderRestriction G]
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) : e.restr s ∈ G :=
ClosedUnderRestriction.closedUnderRestriction he s hs
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid, containing only partial homeomorphisms equivalent
to the restriction of the identity to the various open subsets. -/
def idRestrGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H where
members := { e | ∃ (s : Set H) (h : IsOpen s), e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s h }
trans' := by
rintro e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ ⟨s', hs', hse'⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ s', hs.inter hs', ?_⟩
have := PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.trans' hse hse'
rwa [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_trans_ofSet] at this
symm' := by
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hse⟩
refine ⟨s, hs, ?_⟩
rw [← ofSet_symm]
exact PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.symm' hse
id_mem' := ⟨univ, isOpen_univ, by simp only [mfld_simps, refl]⟩
locality' := by
intro e h
refine ⟨e.source, e.open_source, by simp only [mfld_simps], ?_⟩
intro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨s, hs, hxs, s', hs', hes'⟩
have hes : x ∈ (e.restr s).source := by
rw [e.restr_source]
refine ⟨hx, ?_⟩
rw [hs.interior_eq]
exact hxs
simpa only [mfld_simps] using PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.eqOn hes' hes
mem_of_eqOnSource' := by
rintro e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ hee'
exact ⟨s, hs, Setoid.trans hee' hse⟩
theorem idRestrGroupoid_mem {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) : ofSet s hs ∈ @idRestrGroupoid H _ :=
⟨s, hs, refl _⟩
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid is indeed `ClosedUnderRestriction`. -/
instance closedUnderRestriction_idRestrGroupoid : ClosedUnderRestriction (@idRestrGroupoid H _) :=
⟨by
rintro e ⟨s', hs', he⟩ s hs
use s' ∩ s, hs'.inter hs
refine Setoid.trans (PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.restr he s) ?_
exact ⟨by simp only [hs.interior_eq, mfld_simps], by simp only [mfld_simps, eqOn_refl]⟩⟩
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if and only if it contains the trivial restriction-closed
groupoid. -/
theorem closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le (G : StructureGroupoid H) :
ClosedUnderRestriction G ↔ idRestrGroupoid ≤ G := by
constructor
· intro _i
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
refine G.mem_of_eqOnSource ?_ hes
convert closedUnderRestriction' G.id_mem hs
-- Porting note: was
-- change s = _ ∩ _
-- rw [hs.interior_eq]
-- simp only [mfld_simps]
ext
· rw [PartialHomeomorph.restr_apply, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply, id, ofSet_apply, id_eq]
· simp [hs]
· simp [hs.interior_eq]
· intro h
constructor
intro e he s hs
rw [← ofSet_trans (e : PartialHomeomorph H H) hs]
refine G.trans ?_ he
apply StructureGroupoid.le_iff.mp h
exact idRestrGroupoid_mem hs
/-- The groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms on a topological space `H`
is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (continuousGroupoid H) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr le_top
end Groupoid
/-! ### Charted spaces -/
/-- A charted space is a topological space endowed with an atlas, i.e., a set of local
homeomorphisms taking value in a model space `H`, called charts, such that the domains of the charts
cover the whole space. We express the covering property by choosing for each `x` a member
`chartAt x` of the atlas containing `x` in its source: in the smooth case, this is convenient to
construct the tangent bundle in an efficient way.
The model space is written as an explicit parameter as there can be several model spaces for a
given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold (modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen
sometimes as a real manifold over `ℝ^(2n)`.
-/
@[ext]
class ChartedSpace (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] where
/-- The atlas of charts in the `ChartedSpace`. -/
protected atlas : Set (PartialHomeomorph M H)
/-- The preferred chart at each point in the charted space. -/
protected chartAt : M → PartialHomeomorph M H
protected mem_chart_source : ∀ x, x ∈ (chartAt x).source
protected chart_mem_atlas : ∀ x, chartAt x ∈ atlas
/-- The atlas of charts in a `ChartedSpace`. -/
abbrev atlas (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] : Set (PartialHomeomorph M H) :=
ChartedSpace.atlas
/-- The preferred chart at a point `x` in a charted space `M`. -/
abbrev chartAt (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : PartialHomeomorph M H :=
ChartedSpace.chartAt x
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma mem_chart_source (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : x ∈ (chartAt H x).source :=
ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma chart_mem_atlas (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : chartAt H x ∈ atlas H M :=
ChartedSpace.chart_mem_atlas x
lemma nonempty_of_chartedSpace {H : Type*} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : Nonempty H :=
⟨chartAt H x x⟩
lemma isEmpty_of_chartedSpace (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] [IsEmpty H] : IsEmpty M := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty M with hM | ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
· exact hM
· exact (IsEmpty.false (chartAt H x x)).elim
section ChartedSpace
section
variable (H) [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- Porting note: Added `(H := H)` to avoid typeclass instance problem.
theorem mem_chart_target (x : M) : chartAt H x x ∈ (chartAt H x).target :=
(chartAt H x).map_source (mem_chart_source _ _)
theorem chart_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (chartAt H x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(chartAt H x).open_source.mem_nhds <| mem_chart_source H x
theorem chart_target_mem_nhds (x : M) : (chartAt H x).target ∈ 𝓝 (chartAt H x x) :=
(chartAt H x).open_target.mem_nhds <| mem_chart_target H x
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_source_chartAt : (⋃ x : M, (chartAt H x).source) = (univ : Set M) :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun x ↦ mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨x, mem_chart_source H x⟩
theorem ChartedSpace.isOpen_iff (s : Set M) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x : M, IsOpen <| chartAt H x '' ((chartAt H x).source ∩ s) := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_cover (fun i ↦ (chartAt H i).open_source) (iUnion_source_chartAt H M)]
simp only [(chartAt H _).isOpen_image_iff_of_subset_source inter_subset_left]
/-- `achart H x` is the chart at `x`, considered as an element of the atlas.
Especially useful for working with `BasicContMDiffVectorBundleCore`. -/
def achart (x : M) : atlas H M :=
⟨chartAt H x, chart_mem_atlas H x⟩
theorem achart_def (x : M) : achart H x = ⟨chartAt H x, chart_mem_atlas H x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_achart (x : M) : (achart H x : PartialHomeomorph M H) = chartAt H x :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem achart_val (x : M) : (achart H x).1 = chartAt H x :=
rfl
theorem mem_achart_source (x : M) : x ∈ (achart H x).1.source :=
mem_chart_source H x
open TopologicalSpace
theorem ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_countable_cover [SecondCountableTopology H] {s : Set M}
(hs : ⋃ (x) (_ : x ∈ s), (chartAt H x).source = univ) (hsc : s.Countable) :
SecondCountableTopology M := by
haveI : ∀ x : M, SecondCountableTopology (chartAt H x).source :=
fun x ↦ (chartAt (H := H) x).secondCountableTopology_source
haveI := hsc.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hs
exact secondCountableTopology_of_countable_cover (fun x : s ↦ (chartAt H (x : M)).open_source) hs
variable (M)
theorem ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SecondCountableTopology H]
[SigmaCompactSpace M] : SecondCountableTopology M := by
obtain ⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩ : ∃ s, Set.Countable s ∧ ⋃ (x) (_ : x ∈ s), (chartAt H x).source = univ :=
countable_cover_nhds_of_sigmaCompact fun x : M ↦ chart_source_mem_nhds H x
exact ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_countable_cover H hsU hsc
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-13")] alias
ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigma_compact := ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact
/-- If a topological space admits an atlas with locally compact charts, then the space itself
is locally compact. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace H] : LocallyCompactSpace M := by
have : ∀ x : M, (𝓝 x).HasBasis
(fun s ↦ s ∈ 𝓝 (chartAt H x x) ∧ IsCompact s ∧ s ⊆ (chartAt H x).target)
fun s ↦ (chartAt H x).symm '' s := fun x ↦ by
rw [← (chartAt H x).symm_map_nhds_eq (mem_chart_source H x)]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (chartAt H x x)).hasBasis_self_subset
(chart_target_mem_nhds H x)).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩
exact h₂.image_of_continuousOn ((chartAt H x).continuousOn_symm.mono h₃)
/-- If a topological space admits an atlas with locally connected charts, then the space itself is
locally connected. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locallyConnectedSpace [LocallyConnectedSpace H] : LocallyConnectedSpace M := by
let e : M → PartialHomeomorph M H := chartAt H
refine locallyConnectedSpace_of_connected_bases (fun x s ↦ (e x).symm '' s)
(fun x s ↦ (IsOpen s ∧ e x x ∈ s ∧ IsConnected s) ∧ s ⊆ (e x).target) ?_ ?_
· intro x
simpa only [e, PartialHomeomorph.symm_map_nhds_eq, mem_chart_source] using
((LocallyConnectedSpace.open_connected_basis (e x x)).restrict_subset
((e x).open_target.mem_nhds (mem_chart_target H x))).map (e x).symm
· rintro x s ⟨⟨-, -, hsconn⟩, hssubset⟩
exact hsconn.isPreconnected.image _ ((e x).continuousOn_symm.mono hssubset)
/-- If a topological space `M` admits an atlas with locally path-connected charts,
then `M` itself is locally path-connected. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locPathConnectedSpace [LocPathConnectedSpace H] : LocPathConnectedSpace M := by
refine ⟨fun x ↦ ⟨fun s ↦ ⟨fun hs ↦ ?_, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ ↦ Filter.mem_of_superset hu.1.1 hu.2⟩⟩⟩
let e := chartAt H x
let t := s ∩ e.source
have ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x := Filter.inter_mem hs (chart_source_mem_nhds _ _)
refine ⟨e.symm '' pathComponentIn (e x) (e '' t), ⟨?_, ?_⟩, (?_ : _ ⊆ t).trans inter_subset_left⟩
· nth_rewrite 1 [← e.left_inv (mem_chart_source _ _)]
apply e.symm.image_mem_nhds (by simp [e])
exact pathComponentIn_mem_nhds <| e.image_mem_nhds (mem_chart_source _ _) ht
· refine (isPathConnected_pathComponentIn <| mem_image_of_mem e (mem_of_mem_nhds ht)).image' ?_
refine e.continuousOn_symm.mono <| subset_trans ?_ e.map_source''
exact (pathComponentIn_mono <| image_mono inter_subset_right).trans pathComponentIn_subset
· exact (image_mono pathComponentIn_subset).trans
(PartialEquiv.symm_image_image_of_subset_source _ inter_subset_right).subset
/-- If `M` is modelled on `H'` and `H'` is itself modelled on `H`, then we can consider `M` as being
modelled on `H`. -/
def ChartedSpace.comp (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H']
(M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H H'] [ChartedSpace H' M] :
ChartedSpace H M where
atlas := image2 PartialHomeomorph.trans (atlas H' M) (atlas H H')
chartAt p := (chartAt H' p).trans (chartAt H (chartAt H' p p))
mem_chart_source p := by simp only [mfld_simps]
chart_mem_atlas p := ⟨chartAt _ p, chart_mem_atlas _ p, chartAt _ _, chart_mem_atlas _ _, rfl⟩
theorem chartAt_comp (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H']
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H H'] [ChartedSpace H' M] (x : M) :
(letI := ChartedSpace.comp H H' M; chartAt H x) = chartAt H' x ≫ₕ chartAt H (chartAt H' x x) :=
rfl
/-- A charted space over a T1 space is T1. Note that this is *not* true for T2 (for instance for
the real line with a double origin). -/
theorem ChartedSpace.t1Space [T1Space H] : T1Space M := by
apply t1Space_iff_exists_open.2 (fun x y hxy ↦ ?_)
by_cases hy : y ∈ (chartAt H x).source
· refine ⟨(chartAt H x).source ∩ (chartAt H x)⁻¹' ({chartAt H x y}ᶜ), ?_, ?_, by simp⟩
· exact PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_inter_preimage _ isOpen_compl_singleton
· simp only [preimage_compl, mem_inter_iff, mem_chart_source, mem_compl_iff, mem_preimage,
mem_singleton_iff, true_and]
exact (chartAt H x).injOn.ne (ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x) hy hxy
· exact ⟨(chartAt H x).source, (chartAt H x).open_source, ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x, hy⟩
/-- A charted space over a discrete space is discrete. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.discreteTopology [DiscreteTopology H] : DiscreteTopology M := by
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.1 (fun x ↦ ?_)
have : IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ (chartAt H x) ⁻¹' {chartAt H x x}) :=
isOpen_inter_preimage _ (isOpen_discrete _)
convert this
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp) ?_
simp only [subset_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, and_imp]
intro y hy h'y
exact (chartAt H x).injOn hy (mem_chart_source _ x) h'y
end
section Constructions
/-- An empty type is a charted space over any topological space. -/
def ChartedSpace.empty (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H]
(M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [IsEmpty M] : ChartedSpace H M where
atlas := ∅
chartAt x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
mem_chart_source x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
chart_mem_atlas x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
/-- Any space is a `ChartedSpace` modelled over itself, by just using the identity chart. -/
instance chartedSpaceSelf (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : ChartedSpace H H where
atlas := {PartialHomeomorph.refl H}
chartAt _ := PartialHomeomorph.refl H
mem_chart_source x := mem_univ x
chart_mem_atlas _ := mem_singleton _
/-- In the trivial `ChartedSpace` structure of a space modelled over itself through the identity,
the atlas members are just the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem chartedSpaceSelf_atlas {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} :
e ∈ atlas H H ↔ e = PartialHomeomorph.refl H :=
Iff.rfl
/-- In the model space, `chartAt` is always the identity. -/
theorem chartAt_self_eq {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {x : H} :
chartAt H x = PartialHomeomorph.refl H := rfl
/-- Any discrete space is a charted space over a singleton set.
We keep this as a definition (not an instance) to avoid instance search trying to search for
`DiscreteTopology` or `Unique` instances.
-/
def ChartedSpace.of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace H]
[DiscreteTopology M] [h : Unique H] : ChartedSpace H M where
atlas :=
letI f := fun x : M ↦ PartialHomeomorph.const
(isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default})
Set.image f univ
chartAt x := PartialHomeomorph.const (isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default})
mem_chart_source x := by simp
chart_mem_atlas x := by simp
/-- A chart on the discrete space is the constant chart. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma chartedSpace_of_discreteTopology_chartAt [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace H]
[DiscreteTopology M] [h : Unique H] {x : M} :
haveI := ChartedSpace.of_discreteTopology (M := M) (H := H)
chartAt H x = PartialHomeomorph.const (isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default}) :=
rfl
section Products
library_note "Manifold type tags" /-- For technical reasons we introduce two type tags:
* `ModelProd H H'` is the same as `H × H'`;
* `ModelPi H` is the same as `∀ i, H i`, where `H : ι → Type*` and `ι` is a finite type.
In both cases the reason is the same, so we explain it only in the case of the product. A charted
space `M` with model `H` is a set of charts from `M` to `H` covering the space. Every space is
registered as a charted space over itself, using the only chart `id`, in `chartedSpaceSelf`. You
can also define a product of charted space `M` and `M'` (with model space `H × H'`) by taking the
products of the charts. Now, on `H × H'`, there are two charted space structures with model space
`H × H'` itself, the one coming from `chartedSpaceSelf`, and the one coming from the product of
the two `chartedSpaceSelf` on each component. They are equal, but not defeq (because the product
of `id` and `id` is not defeq to `id`), which is bad as we know. This expedient of renaming `H × H'`
solves this problem. -/
/-- Same thing as `H × H'`. We introduce it for technical reasons,
see note [Manifold type tags]. -/
def ModelProd (H : Type*) (H' : Type*) :=
H × H'
/-- Same thing as `∀ i, H i`. We introduce it for technical reasons,
see note [Manifold type tags]. -/
def ModelPi {ι : Type*} (H : ι → Type*) :=
∀ i, H i
section
-- attribute [local reducible] ModelProd -- Porting note: not available in Lean4
instance modelProdInhabited [Inhabited H] [Inhabited H'] : Inhabited (ModelProd H H') :=
instInhabitedProd
instance (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H'] :
TopologicalSpace (ModelProd H H') :=
instTopologicalSpaceProd
-- Next lemma shows up often when dealing with derivatives, so we register it as simp lemma.
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelProd_range_prod_id {H : Type*} {H' : Type*} {α : Type*} (f : H → α) :
(range fun p : ModelProd H H' ↦ (f p.1, p.2)) = range f ×ˢ (univ : Set H') := by
rw [prod_range_univ_eq]
rfl
end
section
variable {ι : Type*} {Hi : ι → Type*}
instance modelPiInhabited [∀ i, Inhabited (Hi i)] : Inhabited (ModelPi Hi) :=
Pi.instInhabited
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Hi i)] : TopologicalSpace (ModelPi Hi) :=
Pi.topologicalSpace
end
/-- The product of two charted spaces is naturally a charted space, with the canonical
construction of the atlas of product maps. -/
instance prodChartedSpace (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H'] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M']
[ChartedSpace H' M'] : ChartedSpace (ModelProd H H') (M × M') where
atlas := image2 PartialHomeomorph.prod (atlas H M) (atlas H' M')
chartAt x := (chartAt H x.1).prod (chartAt H' x.2)
mem_chart_source x := ⟨mem_chart_source H x.1, mem_chart_source H' x.2⟩
chart_mem_atlas x := mem_image2_of_mem (chart_mem_atlas H x.1) (chart_mem_atlas H' x.2)
section prodChartedSpace
@[ext]
theorem ModelProd.ext {x y : ModelProd H H'} (h₁ : x.1 = y.1) (h₂ : x.2 = y.2) : x = y :=
Prod.ext h₁ h₂
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M'] {x : M × M'}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem prodChartedSpace_chartAt :
chartAt (ModelProd H H') x = (chartAt H x.fst).prod (chartAt H' x.snd) :=
rfl
theorem chartedSpaceSelf_prod : prodChartedSpace H H H' H' = chartedSpaceSelf (H × H') := by
ext1
· simp [prodChartedSpace, atlas, ChartedSpace.atlas]
· ext1
simp only [prodChartedSpace_chartAt, chartAt_self_eq, refl_prod_refl]
rfl
end prodChartedSpace
/-- The product of a finite family of charted spaces is naturally a charted space, with the
canonical construction of the atlas of finite product maps. -/
instance piChartedSpace {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (H : ι → Type*) [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)]
(M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [∀ i, ChartedSpace (H i) (M i)] :
ChartedSpace (ModelPi H) (∀ i, M i) where
atlas := PartialHomeomorph.pi '' Set.pi univ fun _ ↦ atlas (H _) (M _)
chartAt f := PartialHomeomorph.pi fun i ↦ chartAt (H i) (f i)
mem_chart_source f i _ := mem_chart_source (H i) (f i)
chart_mem_atlas f := mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ ↦ chart_mem_atlas (H i) (f i)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem piChartedSpace_chartAt {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (H : ι → Type*)
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)]
[∀ i, ChartedSpace (H i) (M i)] (f : ∀ i, M i) :
chartAt (H := ModelPi H) f = PartialHomeomorph.pi fun i ↦ chartAt (H i) (f i) :=
rfl
end Products
section sum
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace M']
[cm : ChartedSpace H M] [cm' : ChartedSpace H M']
/-- The disjoint union of two charted spaces modelled on a non-empty space `H`
is a charted space over `H`. -/
def ChartedSpace.sum_of_nonempty [Nonempty H] : ChartedSpace H (M ⊕ M') where
atlas := ((fun e ↦ e.lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inl) '' cm.atlas) ∪
((fun e ↦ e.lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inr) '' cm'.atlas)
-- At `x : M`, the chart is the chart in `M`; at `x' ∈ M'`, it is the chart in `M'`.
chartAt := Sum.elim (fun x ↦ (cm.chartAt x).lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inl)
(fun x ↦ (cm'.chartAt x).lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inr)
mem_chart_source p := by
cases p with
| inl x =>
rw [Sum.elim_inl, lift_openEmbedding_source,
← PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding_source _ IsOpenEmbedding.inl]
use x, cm.mem_chart_source x
| inr x =>
rw [Sum.elim_inr, lift_openEmbedding_source,
← PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding_source _ IsOpenEmbedding.inr]
use x, cm'.mem_chart_source x
chart_mem_atlas p := by
cases p with
| inl x =>
rw [Sum.elim_inl]
left
use ChartedSpace.chartAt x, cm.chart_mem_atlas x
| inr x =>
rw [Sum.elim_inr]
right
use ChartedSpace.chartAt x, cm'.chart_mem_atlas x
open scoped Classical in
instance ChartedSpace.sum : ChartedSpace H (M ⊕ M') :=
if h : Nonempty H then ChartedSpace.sum_of_nonempty else by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff] at h
have : IsEmpty M := isEmpty_of_chartedSpace H
have : IsEmpty M' := isEmpty_of_chartedSpace H
exact empty H (M ⊕ M')
lemma ChartedSpace.sum_chartAt_inl (x : M) :
haveI : Nonempty H := nonempty_of_chartedSpace x
chartAt H (Sum.inl x)
= (chartAt H x).lift_openEmbedding (X' := M ⊕ M') IsOpenEmbedding.inl := by
simp only [chartAt, sum, nonempty_of_chartedSpace x, ↓reduceDIte]
rfl
lemma ChartedSpace.sum_chartAt_inr (x' : M') :
haveI : Nonempty H := nonempty_of_chartedSpace x'
chartAt H (Sum.inr x')
= (chartAt H x').lift_openEmbedding (X' := M ⊕ M') IsOpenEmbedding.inr := by
simp only [chartAt, sum, nonempty_of_chartedSpace x', ↓reduceDIte]
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma sum_chartAt_inl_apply {x y : M} :
(chartAt H (.inl x : M ⊕ M')) (Sum.inl y) = (chartAt H x) y := by
haveI : Nonempty H := nonempty_of_chartedSpace x
rw [ChartedSpace.sum_chartAt_inl]
exact PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding_apply _ _
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma sum_chartAt_inr_apply {x y : M'} :
(chartAt H (.inr x : M ⊕ M')) (Sum.inr y) = (chartAt H x) y := by
haveI : Nonempty H := nonempty_of_chartedSpace x
rw [ChartedSpace.sum_chartAt_inr]
exact PartialHomeomorph.lift_openEmbedding_apply _ _
lemma ChartedSpace.mem_atlas_sum [h : Nonempty H]
{e : PartialHomeomorph (M ⊕ M') H} (he : e ∈ atlas H (M ⊕ M')) :
(∃ f : PartialHomeomorph M H, f ∈ (atlas H M) ∧ e = (f.lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inl))
∨ (∃ f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H, f' ∈ (atlas H M') ∧
e = (f'.lift_openEmbedding IsOpenEmbedding.inr)) := by
simp only [atlas, sum, h, ↓reduceDIte] at he
obtain (⟨x, hx, hxe⟩ | ⟨x, hx, hxe⟩) := he
· rw [← hxe]; left; use x
· rw [← hxe]; right; use x
end sum
end Constructions
end ChartedSpace
/-! ### Constructing a topology from an atlas -/
/-- Sometimes, one may want to construct a charted space structure on a space which does not yet
have a topological structure, where the topology would come from the charts. For this, one needs
charts that are only partial equivalences, and continuity properties for their composition.
This is formalised in `ChartedSpaceCore`. -/
structure ChartedSpaceCore (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) where
/-- An atlas of charts, which are only `PartialEquiv`s -/
atlas : Set (PartialEquiv M H)
/-- The preferred chart at each point -/
chartAt : M → PartialEquiv M H
mem_chart_source : ∀ x, x ∈ (chartAt x).source
chart_mem_atlas : ∀ x, chartAt x ∈ atlas
open_source : ∀ e e' : PartialEquiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas → IsOpen (e.symm.trans e').source
continuousOn_toFun : ∀ e e' : PartialEquiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas →
ContinuousOn (e.symm.trans e') (e.symm.trans e').source
namespace ChartedSpaceCore
variable [TopologicalSpace H] (c : ChartedSpaceCore H M) {e : PartialEquiv M H}
/-- Topology generated by a set of charts on a Type. -/
protected def toTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace M :=
TopologicalSpace.generateFrom <|
⋃ (e : PartialEquiv M H) (_ : e ∈ c.atlas) (s : Set H) (_ : IsOpen s),
{e ⁻¹' s ∩ e.source}
theorem open_source' (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : IsOpen[c.toTopologicalSpace] e.source := by
apply TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨e, he, univ, isOpen_univ, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.univ_inter, Set.preimage_univ]
theorem open_target (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : IsOpen e.target := by
have E : e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e.source = e.target :=
Subset.antisymm inter_subset_left fun x hx ↦
⟨hx, PartialEquiv.target_subset_preimage_source _ hx⟩
simpa [PartialEquiv.trans_source, E] using c.open_source e e he he
/-- An element of the atlas in a charted space without topology becomes a partial homeomorphism
for the topology constructed from this atlas. The `PartialHomeomorph` version is given in this
definition. -/
protected def partialHomeomorph (e : PartialEquiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas) :
@PartialHomeomorph M H c.toTopologicalSpace _ :=
{ __ := c.toTopologicalSpace
__ := e
open_source := by convert c.open_source' he
open_target := by convert c.open_target he
continuousOn_toFun := by
letI : TopologicalSpace M := c.toTopologicalSpace
rw [continuousOn_open_iff (c.open_source' he)]
intro s s_open
rw [inter_comm]
apply TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨e, he, ⟨s, s_open, rfl⟩⟩
continuousOn_invFun := by
letI : TopologicalSpace M := c.toTopologicalSpace
apply continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom
intro t ht
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨e', e'_atlas, s, s_open, ts⟩
rw [ts]
let f := e.symm.trans e'
have : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s ∩ f.source) := by
simpa [f, inter_comm] using (continuousOn_open_iff (c.open_source e e' he e'_atlas)).1
(c.continuousOn_toFun e e' he e'_atlas) s s_open
have A : e' ∘ e.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e'.source) =
e.target ∩ (e' ∘ e.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e'.source) := by
rw [← inter_assoc, ← inter_assoc]
congr 1
exact inter_comm _ _
simpa [f, PartialEquiv.trans_source, preimage_inter, preimage_comp.symm, A] using this }
/-- Given a charted space without topology, endow it with a genuine charted space structure with
respect to the topology constructed from the atlas. -/
def toChartedSpace : @ChartedSpace H _ M c.toTopologicalSpace :=
{ __ := c.toTopologicalSpace
atlas := ⋃ (e : PartialEquiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas), {c.partialHomeomorph e he}
chartAt := fun x ↦ c.partialHomeomorph (c.chartAt x) (c.chart_mem_atlas x)
mem_chart_source := fun x ↦ c.mem_chart_source x
chart_mem_atlas := fun x ↦ by
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨c.chartAt x, c.chart_mem_atlas x, rfl⟩}
end ChartedSpaceCore
/-! ### Charted space with a given structure groupoid -/
section HasGroupoid
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- A charted space has an atlas in a groupoid `G` if the change of coordinates belong to the
groupoid. -/
class HasGroupoid {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (G : StructureGroupoid H) : Prop where
compatible : ∀ {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H}, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M → e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G
/-- Reformulate in the `StructureGroupoid` namespace the compatibility condition of charts in a
charted space admitting a structure groupoid, to make it more easily accessible with dot
| notation. -/
theorem StructureGroupoid.compatible {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (G : StructureGroupoid H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [HasGroupoid M G]
{e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ atlas H M) (he' : e' ∈ atlas H M) : e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
HasGroupoid.compatible he he'
theorem hasGroupoid_of_le {G₁ G₂ : StructureGroupoid H} (h : HasGroupoid M G₁) (hle : G₁ ≤ G₂) :
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ChartedSpace.lean | 1,082 | 1,088 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Canonical
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
/-!
# Equitabilising a partition
This file allows to blow partitions up into parts of controlled size. Given a partition `P` and
`a b m : ℕ`, we want to find a partition `Q` with `a` parts of size `m` and `b` parts of size
`m + 1` such that all parts of `P` are "as close as possible" to unions of parts of `Q`. By
"as close as possible", we mean that each part of `P` can be written as the union of some parts of
`Q` along with at most `m` other elements.
## Main declarations
* `Finpartition.equitabilise`: `P.equitabilise h` where `h : a * m + b * (m + 1)` is a partition
with `a` parts of size `m` and `b` parts of size `m + 1` which almost refines `P`.
* `Finpartition.exists_equipartition_card_eq`: We can find equipartitions of arbitrary size.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Nat
namespace Finpartition
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {m n a b : ℕ} {P : Finpartition s}
/-- Given a partition `P` of `s`, as well as a proof that `a * m + b * (m + 1) = #s`, we can
find a new partition `Q` of `s` where each part has size `m` or `m + 1`, every part of `P` is the
union of parts of `Q` plus at most `m` extra elements, there are `b` parts of size `m + 1` and
(provided `m > 0`, because a partition does not have parts of size `0`) there are `a` parts of size
`m` and hence `a + b` parts in total. -/
theorem equitabilise_aux (hs : a * m + b * (m + 1) = #s) :
| ∃ Q : Finpartition s,
(∀ x : Finset α, x ∈ Q.parts → #x = m ∨ #x = m + 1) ∧
(∀ x, x ∈ P.parts → #(x \ {y ∈ Q.parts | y ⊆ x}.biUnion id) ≤ m) ∧
#{i ∈ Q.parts | #i = m + 1} = b := by
-- Get rid of the easy case `m = 0`
obtain rfl | m_pos := m.eq_zero_or_pos
· refine ⟨⊥, by simp, ?_, by simpa [Finset.filter_true_of_mem] using hs.symm⟩
simp only [le_zero_iff, card_eq_zero, mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_filter, id,
and_assoc, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_iff]
exact fun x hx a ha =>
⟨{a}, mem_map_of_mem _ (P.le hx ha), singleton_subset_iff.2 ha, mem_singleton_self _⟩
-- Prove the case `m > 0` by strong induction on `s`
induction s using Finset.strongInduction generalizing a b with | H s ih => _
-- If `a = b = 0`, then `s = ∅` and we can partition into zero parts
by_cases hab : a = 0 ∧ b = 0
· simp only [hab.1, hab.2, add_zero, zero_mul, eq_comm, card_eq_zero, Finset.bot_eq_empty] at hs
subst hs
-- Porting note: to synthesize `Finpartition ∅`, `have` is required
have : P = Finpartition.empty _ := Unique.eq_default (α := Finpartition ⊥) P
exact ⟨Finpartition.empty _, by simp, by simp [this], by simp [hab.2]⟩
simp_rw [not_and_or, ← Ne.eq_def, ← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hab
-- `n` will be the size of the smallest part
set n := if 0 < a then m else m + 1 with hn
-- Some easy facts about it
obtain ⟨hn₀, hn₁, hn₂, hn₃⟩ : 0 < n ∧ n ≤ m + 1 ∧ n ≤ a * m + b * (m + 1) ∧
ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = #s - n := by
rw [hn, ← hs]
split_ifs with h <;> rw [tsub_mul, one_mul]
· refine ⟨m_pos, le_succ _, le_add_right (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ ‹0 < a›), ?_⟩
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ h)]
· refine ⟨succ_pos', le_rfl,
le_add_left (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| hab.resolve_left ‹¬0 < a›), ?_⟩
rw [← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| hab.resolve_left ‹¬0 < a›)]
/- We will call the inductive hypothesis on a partition of `s \ t` for a carefully chosen `t ⊆ s`.
To decide which, however, we must distinguish the case where all parts of `P` have size `m` (in
which case we take `t` to be an arbitrary subset of `s` of size `n`) from the case where at
least one part `u` of `P` has size `m + 1` (in which case we take `t` to be an arbitrary subset
of `u` of size `n`). The rest of each branch is just tedious calculations to satisfy the
induction hypothesis. -/
by_cases h : ∀ u ∈ P.parts, #u < m + 1
· obtain ⟨t, hts, htn⟩ := exists_subset_card_eq (hn₂.trans_eq hs)
have ht : t.Nonempty := by rwa [← card_pos, htn]
have hcard : ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = #(s \ t) := by
rw [card_sdiff ‹t ⊆ s›, htn, hn₃]
obtain ⟨R, hR₁, _, hR₃⟩ :=
@ih (s \ t) (sdiff_ssubset hts ‹t.Nonempty›) (if 0 < a then a - 1 else a)
(if 0 < a then b else b - 1) (P.avoid t) hcard
refine ⟨R.extend ht.ne_empty sdiff_disjoint (sdiff_sup_cancel hts), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [extend_parts, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, and_iff_left hR₁, htn, hn]
exact ite_eq_or_eq _ _ _
· exact fun x hx => (card_le_card sdiff_subset).trans (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 <| h _ hx)
simp_rw [extend_parts, filter_insert, htn, n, m.succ_ne_self.symm.ite_eq_right_iff]
split_ifs with ha
· rw [hR₃, if_pos ha]
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem, hR₃, if_neg ha, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
· exact hab.resolve_left ha
· intro H; exact ht.ne_empty (le_sdiff_right.1 <| R.le <| filter_subset _ _ H)
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := h
obtain ⟨t, htu, htn⟩ := exists_subset_card_eq (hn₁.trans hu₂)
have ht : t.Nonempty := by rwa [← card_pos, htn]
have hcard : ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = #(s \ t) := by
rw [card_sdiff (htu.trans <| P.le hu₁), htn, hn₃]
obtain ⟨R, hR₁, hR₂, hR₃⟩ :=
@ih (s \ t) (sdiff_ssubset (htu.trans <| P.le hu₁) ht) (if 0 < a then a - 1 else a)
(if 0 < a then b else b - 1) (P.avoid t) hcard
refine
⟨R.extend ht.ne_empty sdiff_disjoint (sdiff_sup_cancel <| htu.trans <| P.le hu₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, extend_parts, and_iff_left hR₁, htn, hn]
exact ite_eq_or_eq _ _ _
· conv in _ ∈ _ => rw [← insert_erase hu₁]
simp only [and_imp, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, Ne, extend_parts]
refine ⟨?_, fun x hx => (card_le_card ?_).trans <| hR₂ x ?_⟩
· simp only [filter_insert, if_pos htu, biUnion_insert, mem_erase, id]
obtain rfl | hut := eq_or_ne u t
· rw [sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset.2 subset_union_left]
exact bot_le
refine
(card_le_card fun i => ?_).trans
(hR₂ (u \ t) <| P.mem_avoid.2 ⟨u, hu₁, fun i => hut <| i.antisymm htu, rfl⟩)
simpa using fun hi₁ hi₂ hi₃ =>
⟨⟨hi₁, hi₂⟩, fun x hx hx' => hi₃ _ hx <| hx'.trans sdiff_subset⟩
· apply sdiff_subset_sdiff Subset.rfl (biUnion_subset_biUnion_of_subset_left _ _)
exact filter_subset_filter _ (subset_insert _ _)
simp only [avoid, ofErase, mem_erase, mem_image, bot_eq_empty]
exact
⟨(nonempty_of_mem_parts _ <| mem_of_mem_erase hx).ne_empty, _, mem_of_mem_erase hx,
(disjoint_of_subset_right htu <|
P.disjoint (mem_of_mem_erase hx) hu₁ <| ne_of_mem_erase hx).sdiff_eq_left⟩
simp only [extend_parts, filter_insert, htn, hn, m.succ_ne_self.symm.ite_eq_right_iff]
split_ifs with h
· rw [hR₃, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem, hR₃, if_neg h, Nat.sub_add_cancel (hab.resolve_left h)]
intro H; exact ht.ne_empty (le_sdiff_right.1 <| R.le <| filter_subset _ _ H)
variable (h : a * m + b * (m + 1) = #s)
/-- Given a partition `P` of `s`, as well as a proof that `a * m + b * (m + 1) = #s`, build a
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Equitabilise.lean | 42 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
/-!
# Star structure on `CliffordAlgebra`
This file defines the "clifford conjugation", equal to `reverse (involute x)`, and assigns it the
`star` notation.
This choice is somewhat non-canonical; a star structure is also possible under `reverse` alone.
However, defining it gives us access to constructions like `unitary`.
Most results about `star` can be obtained by unfolding it via `CliffordAlgebra.star_def`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.instStarRing`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
instance instStarRing : StarRing (CliffordAlgebra Q) where
star x := reverse (involute x)
star_involutive x := by
simp only [reverse_involute_commute.eq, reverse_reverse, involute_involute]
star_mul x y := by simp only [map_mul, reverse.map_mul]
star_add x y := by simp only [map_add]
theorem star_def (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : star x = reverse (involute x) :=
rfl
theorem star_def' (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : star x = involute (reverse x) :=
reverse_involute _
@[simp]
theorem star_ι (m : M) : star (ι Q m) = -ι Q m := by rw [star_def, involute_ι, map_neg, reverse_ι]
/-- Note that this not match the `star_smul` implied by `StarModule`; it certainly could if we
also conjugated all the scalars, but there appears to be nothing in the literature that advocates
doing this. -/
@[simp]
theorem star_smul (r : R) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : star (r • x) = r • star x := by
rw [star_def, star_def, map_smul, map_smul]
@[simp]
theorem star_algebraMap (r : R) :
| star (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r := by
rw [star_def, involute.commutes, reverse.commutes]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Star.lean | 57 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE (ℤ√d) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
· exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro _ h))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· dsimp
rw [add_comm, add_comm (y : ℤ)]
exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : Nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show _ ↔ Nonneg _ by simp
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show Nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩ from
match z - x, w - y, Int.le.dest_sub xz, Int.le.dest_sub yw with
| _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => trivial
open Int in
protected theorem nonneg_total : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Nonneg a ∨ Nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ => Or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨(_ + 1 : ℕ), -[_+1]⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
| ⟨-[_+1], (_ + 1 : ℕ)⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
have t := (b - a).nonneg_total
rwa [neg_sub] at t
instance preorder : Preorder (ℤ√d) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := show Nonneg (a - a) by simp only [sub_self]; trivial
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by simpa [sub_add_sub_cancel'] using hab.add hbc
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := (and_iff_right_of_imp (Zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm
open Int in
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃ n : ℕ, a ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ : ∃ x y : ℕ, Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a) :=
match -a with
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨0, 0, by trivial⟩
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨0, y + 1, by simp [add_def, Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨x + 1, 0, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨x + 1, y + 1, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
refine ⟨x + d * y, h.trans ?_⟩
change Nonneg ⟨↑x + d * y - ↑x, 0 - ↑y⟩
rcases y with - | y
· simp
trivial
have h : ∀ y, SqLe y d (d * y) 1 := fun y => by
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (Nat.le_mul_self d)
rw [show (x : ℤ) + d * Nat.succ y - x = d * Nat.succ y by simp]
exact h (y + 1)
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show Nonneg _ by rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]; exact ab
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b := by
simpa using Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b := fun h' =>
h (Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg ((n : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast n]
exact
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => by rw [smul_val]; trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val, mul_neg]
apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val]
apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) := by
have : (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = (x : ℤ√d) * a + sqrtd * ((y : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [this]
exact (nonneg_smul ha).add (nonneg_muld <| nonneg_smul ha)
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _, _ => trivial
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2
(sqLe_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b := by
simp_rw [← nonneg_iff_zero_le]
exact nonneg_mul
theorem not_sqLe_succ (c d y) (h : 0 < c) : ¬SqLe (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt <| mul_pos (mul_pos h <| Nat.succ_pos _) <| Nat.succ_pos _
-- Porting note: renamed field and added theorem to make `x` explicit
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class Nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop where
ns' : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n
theorem Nonsquare.ns (x : ℕ) [Nonsquare x] : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n := ns'
variable [dnsq : Nonsquare d]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) <| Ne.symm <| Nonsquare.ns d 0
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y
Or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(fun H => ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩) fun gpos =>
False.elim <| by
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime _ _
rw [hx, hy] at h
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_pos gpos gpos).ne' ?_
-- Porting note: was `simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h`
calc
g * g * (m * m)
_ = m * g * (m * g) := by ring
_ = d * (n * g) * (n * g) := h
_ = g * g * (d * (n * n)) := by ring
have co2 :=
let co1 := co.mul_right co
co1.mul co1
exact
Nonsquare.ns d m
(Nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw [this]; apply dvd_mul_right) <|
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <| by simp [this])
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero_z {x y : ℤ} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natCast_mul, ← mul_assoc] at h
exact
let ⟨h1, h2⟩ := divides_sq_eq_zero (Int.ofNat.inj h)
⟨Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h1, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h2⟩
theorem not_divides_sq (x y) : (x + 1) * (x + 1) ≠ d * (y + 1) * (y + 1) := fun e => by
have t := (divides_sq_eq_zero e).left
contradiction
open Int in
theorem nonneg_antisymm : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → Nonneg (-a) → a = 0
| ⟨0, 0⟩, _, _ => rfl
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => False.elim xy
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => False.elim yx
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), 0⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨0, (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨(x + 1 : Nat), -[y+1]⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm yx xy
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
| ⟨-[x+1], (y + 1 : Nat)⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm xy yx
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℤ√d} (ab : a ≤ b) (ba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| nonneg_antisymm ba (by rwa [neg_sub])
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.preorder with
le_antisymm := fun _ _ => Zsqrtd.le_antisymm
le_total := Zsqrtd.le_total
toDecidableLE := Zsqrtd.decidableLE
| toDecidableEq := inferInstance }
protected theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : ℤ√d}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
| ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨z, w⟩, h => by
injection h with h1 h2
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 806 | 810 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.EckmannHilton
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Constructing a semiadditive structure from binary biproducts
We show that any category with zero morphisms and binary biproducts is enriched over the category
of commutative monoids.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
section
variable (X Y : C)
/-- `f +ₗ g` is the composite `X ⟶ Y ⊞ Y ⟶ Y`, where the first map is `(f, g)` and the second map
is `(𝟙 𝟙)`. -/
@[simp]
def leftAdd (f g : X ⟶ Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y)
/-- `f +ᵣ g` is the composite `X ⟶ X ⊞ X ⟶ Y`, where the first map is `(𝟙, 𝟙)` and the second map
is `(f g)`. -/
@[simp]
def rightAdd (f g : X ⟶ Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ biprod.desc f g
local infixr:65 " +ₗ " => leftAdd X Y
local infixr:65 " +ᵣ " => rightAdd X Y
theorem isUnital_leftAdd : EckmannHilton.IsUnital (· +ₗ ·) 0 := by
have hr : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) f = f ≫ biprod.inr := by
intro f
ext
| · simp
· simp [biprod.lift_fst, Category.assoc, biprod.inr_fst, comp_zero]
have hl : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.lift f (0 : X ⟶ Y) = f ≫ biprod.inl := by
intro f
ext
· simp
· simp [biprod.lift_snd, Category.assoc, biprod.inl_snd, comp_zero]
exact {
left_id := fun f => by simp [hr f, leftAdd, Category.assoc, Category.comp_id, biprod.inr_desc],
right_id := fun f => by simp [hl f, leftAdd, Category.assoc, Category.comp_id, biprod.inl_desc]
}
theorem isUnital_rightAdd : EckmannHilton.IsUnital (· +ᵣ ·) 0 := by
have h₂ : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.desc (0 : X ⟶ Y) f = biprod.snd ≫ f := by
intro f
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/OfBiproducts.lean | 54 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lorenzo Luccioli, Rémy Degenne, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Probability.Moments.ComplexMGF
/-!
# Gaussian distributions over ℝ
We define a Gaussian measure over the reals.
## Main definitions
* `gaussianPDFReal`: the function `μ v x ↦ (1 / (sqrt (2 * pi * v))) * exp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))`,
which is the probability density function of a Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v` (when `v ≠ 0`).
* `gaussianPDF`: `ℝ≥0∞`-valued pdf, `gaussianPDF μ v x = ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)`.
* `gaussianReal`: a Gaussian measure on `ℝ`, parametrized by its mean `μ` and variance `v`.
If `v = 0`, this is `dirac μ`, otherwise it is defined as the measure with density
`gaussianPDF μ v` with respect to the Lebesgue measure.
## Main results
* `gaussianReal_add_const`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `X + y` is Gaussian with mean `μ + y` and variance `v`.
* `gaussianReal_const_mul`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `c * X` is Gaussian with mean `c * μ` and variance `c^2 * v`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Real Complex
open MeasureTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section GaussianPDF
/-- Probability density function of the gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))
lemma gaussianPDFReal_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v =
fun x ↦ (Real.sqrt (2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v)) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_zero_var (m : ℝ) : gaussianPDFReal m 0 = 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [gaussianPDFReal]
/-- The gaussian pdf is positive when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_pos (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) (hv : v ≠ 0) : 0 < gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is nonnegative. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_nonneg (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(((measurable_id.add_const _).pow_const _).neg.div_const _).exp.const_mul _
/-- The gaussian pdf is strongly measurable. -/
lemma stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
StronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).stronglyMeasurable
@[fun_prop]
lemma integrable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
Integrable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal_def]
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp [hv]
let g : ℝ → ℝ := fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- x ^ 2 / (2 * v))
have hg : Integrable g := by
suffices g = fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (2 * v)⁻¹ * x ^ 2) by
rw [this]
refine (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq ?_).const_mul (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹
simp [lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) (Ne.symm hv)]
ext x
simp only [g, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe, Real.sqrt_mul',
mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_inv, NNReal.coe_ofNat, neg_mul, mul_eq_mul_left_iff,
Real.exp_eq_exp, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Real.sqrt_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, hv,
false_or]
rw [mul_comm]
left
field_simp
exact Integrable.comp_sub_right hg μ
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_one_iff]
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) volume :=
(stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).aestronglyMeasurable
have hf : 0 ≤ₐₛ gaussianPDFReal μ v := ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v)
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfm]
simp only [gaussianPDFReal, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, one_div,
Nat.cast_ofNat, integral_const_mul]
rw [integral_sub_right_eq_self (μ := volume) (fun a ↦ rexp (-a ^ 2 / ((2 : ℝ) * v))) μ]
simp only [zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv_rev,
mul_neg]
simp_rw [← neg_mul]
rw [neg_mul, integral_gaussian, ← Real.sqrt_inv, ← Real.sqrt_mul]
· field_simp
ring
· positivity
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma integral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
∫ x, gaussianPDFReal μ v x = 1 := by
have h := lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ hv
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _)
(ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)), ← ENNReal.ofReal_one] at h
rwa [← ENNReal.ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff (integral_nonneg (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)) zero_le_one]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_sub {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x - y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ + y) v x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal]
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_add {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x + y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ - y) v x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← gaussianPDFReal_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c⁻¹ * x) = |c| * gaussianPDFReal (c * μ) (⟨c^2, sq_nonneg _⟩ * v) x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal.eq_1, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe,
Real.sqrt_mul', one_div, mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_mk, NNReal.coe_pos]
rw [← mul_assoc]
refine congr_arg₂ _ ?_ ?_
· field_simp
rw [Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs]
ring_nf
calc (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹
= (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * (|c| * |c|⁻¹) := by
rw [mul_inv_cancel₀, mul_one]
simp only [ne_eq, abs_eq_zero, hc, not_false_eq_true]
_ = (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * |c| * |c|⁻¹ := by ring
· congr 1
field_simp
congr 1
ring
lemma gaussianPDFReal_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c * x)
= |c⁻¹| * gaussianPDFReal (c⁻¹ * μ) (⟨(c^2)⁻¹, inv_nonneg.mpr (sq_nonneg _)⟩ * v) x := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_inv c, gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul (inv_ne_zero hc)]
simp
/-- The pdf of a Gaussian distribution on ℝ with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ := ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)
lemma gaussianPDF_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDF μ v = fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDF_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianPDF μ 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [gaussianPDF]
@[simp]
lemma toReal_gaussianPDF {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x : ℝ) :
(gaussianPDF μ v x).toReal = gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v x)]
lemma gaussianPDF_pos (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) : 0 < gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact gaussianPDFReal_pos _ _ _ hv
lemma gaussianPDF_lt_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x < ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
lemma gaussianPDF_ne_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x ≠ ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
lemma measurable_gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDF μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal _ _).ennreal_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDF_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, gaussianPDF μ v x = 1 :=
lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ h
end GaussianPDF
section GaussianReal
/-- A Gaussian distribution on `ℝ` with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measure ℝ :=
if v = 0 then Measure.dirac μ else volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v)
lemma gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
gaussianReal μ v = volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v) := if_neg hv
@[simp]
lemma gaussianReal_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianReal μ 0 = Measure.dirac μ := if_pos rfl
instance instIsProbabilityMeasureGaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (gaussianReal μ v) where
measure_univ := by by_cases h : v = 0 <;> simp [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero, h]
lemma gaussianReal_apply (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
gaussianReal μ v s = ∫⁻ x in s, gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv, withDensity_apply' _ s]
lemma gaussianReal_apply_eq_integral (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
gaussianReal μ v s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x in s, gaussianPDFReal μ v x) := by
rw [gaussianReal_apply _ hv s, ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· rfl
· exact (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _).restrict
· exact ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)
lemma gaussianReal_absolutelyContinuous (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
gaussianReal μ v ≪ volume := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
lemma gaussianReal_absolutelyContinuous' (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
volume ≪ gaussianReal μ v := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv]
refine withDensity_absolutelyContinuous' ?_ ?_
· exact (measurable_gaussianPDF _ _).aemeasurable
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ (gaussianPDF_pos _ hv _).ne')
lemma rnDeriv_gaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
∂(gaussianReal μ v)/∂volume =ₐₛ gaussianPDF μ v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp only [hv, gaussianReal_zero_var, gaussianPDF_zero_var]
refine (Measure.eq_rnDeriv measurable_zero (mutuallySingular_dirac μ volume) ?_).symm
rw [withDensity_zero, add_zero]
· rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv]
exact Measure.rnDeriv_withDensity _ (measurable_gaussianPDF μ v)
lemma integral_gaussianReal_eq_integral_smul {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → E} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
∫ x, f x ∂(gaussianReal μ v) = ∫ x, gaussianPDFReal μ v x • f x := by
simp [gaussianReal, hv,
integral_withDensity_eq_integral_toReal_smul (measurable_gaussianPDF _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun _ ↦ gaussianPDF_lt_top)]
section Transformations
variable {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0}
lemma _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.gaussianReal_comap_apply (hv : v ≠ 0)
{f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
{f' : ℝ → ℝ} (h_deriv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(gaussianReal μ v).comap f s
= ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x in s, |f' x| * gaussianPDFReal μ v (f x)) := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv, gaussianPDF_def]
exact hf.withDensity_ofReal_comap_apply_eq_integral_abs_deriv_mul' hs h_deriv
(ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)) (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _)
lemma _root_.MeasurableEquiv.gaussianReal_map_symm_apply (hv : v ≠ 0) (f : ℝ ≃ᵐ ℝ) {f' : ℝ → ℝ}
(h_deriv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(gaussianReal μ v).map f.symm s
= ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x in s, |f' x| * gaussianPDFReal μ v (f x)) := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv, gaussianPDF_def]
exact f.withDensity_ofReal_map_symm_apply_eq_integral_abs_deriv_mul' hs h_deriv
(ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)) (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _)
/-- The map of a Gaussian distribution by addition of a constant is a Gaussian. -/
| lemma gaussianReal_map_add_const (y : ℝ) :
(gaussianReal μ v).map (· + y) = gaussianReal (μ + y) v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp only [hv, ne_eq, not_true, gaussianReal_zero_var]
exact Measure.map_dirac (measurable_id'.add_const _) _
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Gaussian.lean | 269 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
fun h x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_map.1 hx
exact h _ hy⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (x : s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) = f '' s :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_map, Set.mem_image, implies_true])
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.map f) = f '' s := coe_map f s
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem map_perm {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : s.map (σ : α ↪ α) = s :=
coe_injective <| (coe_map _ _).trans <| Set.image_perm hs
theorem map_toFinset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.map f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_map, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : s.map (Embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem map_cast_heq {α β} (h : α = β) (s : Finset α) :
HEq (s.map (Equiv.cast h).toEmbedding) s := by
subst h
simp
theorem map_map (f : α ↪ β) (g : β ↪ γ) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
theorem map_comm {β'} {f : β ↪ γ} {g : α ↪ β} {f' : α ↪ β'} {g' : β' ↪ γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.map g).map f = (s.map f').map g' := by
simp_rw [map_map, Embedding.trans, Function.comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_map {f : α ↪ β} {ga : α ↪ α} {gb : β ↪ β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) := fun _ =>
map_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_map {f g : α ↪ α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ xs => (mem_map' _).1 <| h <| (mem_map' f).2 xs,
fun h => by simp [subset_def, Multiset.map_subset_map h]⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_subset⟩ := map_subset_map
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.subset_symm_image`. -/
theorem subset_map_symm {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : s ⊆ t.map f.symm ↔ s.map f ⊆ t := by
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv, Equiv.symm_symm] at hx
simpa using h hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv]
exact h (by simp [hx])
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.symm_image_subset`. -/
theorem map_symm_subset {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : t.map f.symm ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ s.map f := by
simp only [← subset_map_symm, Equiv.symm_symm]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the order embedding that maps a finset to its
image under `f`. -/
def mapEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) : Finset α ↪o Finset β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (map f) fun _ _ => map_subset_map
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective.eq_iff
theorem map_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Injective (map f) :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective
@[simp]
theorem map_ssubset_map {s t : Finset α} : s.map f ⊂ t.map f ↔ s ⊂ t := (mapEmbedding f).lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_ssubset⟩ := map_ssubset_map
@[simp]
theorem mapEmbedding_apply : mapEmbedding f s = map f s :=
rfl
theorem filter_map {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
eq_of_veq (Multiset.filter_map _ _ _)
lemma map_filter' (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α)
[DecidablePred (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = ·)] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [Function.comp_def, filter_map, f.injective.eq_iff]
lemma filter_attach' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
s.attach.filter p =
(s.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map
⟨Subtype.map id <| filter_subset _ _, Subtype.map_injective _ injective_id⟩ :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach' _ _
lemma filter_attach (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
s.attach.filter (fun a : s ↦ p a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map ((Embedding.refl _).subtypeMap mem_of_mem_filter) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach _ _
theorem map_filter {f : α ≃ β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).map f.toEmbedding = (s.map f.toEmbedding).filter (p ∘ f.symm) := by
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_map {s t : Finset α} (f : α ↪ β) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
mod_cast Set.disjoint_image_iff f.injective (s := s) (t := t)
theorem map_disjUnion {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h) (h' := (disjoint_map _).mpr h) :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_add _ _ _
/-- A version of `Finset.map_disjUnion` for writing in the other direction. -/
theorem map_disjUnion' {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h') (h := (disjoint_map _).mp h') :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
map_disjUnion _ _ _
theorem map_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem map_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_inter f.injective (s := s₁) (t := s₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_map, coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_insert [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(cons a s ha).map f = cons (f a) (s.map f) (by simpa using ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_cons f a s.val
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := (map_injective f).eq_iff' (map_empty f)
@[simp]
theorem map_nonempty : (s.map f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := s)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.map⟩ := map_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem map_nontrivial : (s.map f).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
mod_cast Set.image_nontrivial f.injective (s := s)
theorem attach_map_val {s : Finset α} : s.attach.map (Embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq <| by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact Multiset.attach_map_val _
end Map
theorem range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨fun i => i + 1, fun i j => by simp⟩) := by
ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩) <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section Image
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
(s.1.map f).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).dedup :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : Finset α).image f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f g : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {a : α} {b c : β}
@[simp]
theorem mem_image : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b := by
simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
lemma forall_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
lemma exists_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image := forall_mem_image
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq (s.map f).2.dedup.symm
-- Not `@[simp]` since `mem_image` already gets most of the way there.
theorem mem_image_const : c ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ b = c := by
rw [mem_image]
simp only [exists_prop, const_apply, exists_and_right]
rfl
theorem mem_image_const_self : b ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mem_image_const.trans <| and_iff_left rfl
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift β α c p] :
CanLift (Finset β) (Finset α) (image c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨⟨l⟩, hd : l.Nodup⟩ hl
lift l to List α using hl
exact ⟨⟨l, hd.of_map _⟩, ext fun a => by simp⟩
theorem image_congr (h : (s : Set α).EqOn f g) : Finset.image f s = Finset.image g s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_image, ← bex_def]
exact exists₂_congr fun x hx => by rw [h hx]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_finset_image (hf : Injective f) :
f a ∈ s.image f ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem f⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, heq⟩ := mem_image.1 h
exact hf heq ▸ hy
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
Set.ext <| by simp only [mem_coe, mem_image, Set.mem_image, implies_true]
|
@[simp]
lemma image_nonempty : (s.image f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 327 | 329 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Hom
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
/-!
# Tensor product of modules over commutative semirings.
This file constructs the tensor product of modules over commutative semirings. Given a semiring `R`
and modules over it `M` and `N`, the standard construction of the tensor product is
`TensorProduct R M N`. It is also a module over `R`.
It comes with a canonical bilinear map
`TensorProduct.mk R M N : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] TensorProduct R M N`.
Given any bilinear map `f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P`, there is a unique linear map
`TensorProduct.lift f : TensorProduct R M N →ₗ[R] P` whose composition with the canonical bilinear
map `TensorProduct.mk` is the given bilinear map `f`. Uniqueness is shown in the theorem
`TensorProduct.lift.unique`.
## Notation
* This file introduces the notation `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N` for the tensor product space
`TensorProduct R M N`.
* It introduces the notation `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n` for the tensor product of two elements,
otherwise written as `TensorProduct.tmul R m n`.
## Tags
bilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R' : Type*} [Monoid R']
variable {R'' : Type*} [Semiring R'']
variable {A M N P Q S T : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [AddCommMonoid Q] [AddCommMonoid S] [AddCommMonoid T]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R Q] [Module R S] [Module R T]
variable [DistribMulAction R' M]
variable [Module R'' M]
variable (M N)
namespace TensorProduct
section
variable (R)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (M × N)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → Prop
| of_zero_left : ∀ n : N, Eqv (.of (0, n)) 0
| of_zero_right : ∀ m : M, Eqv (.of (m, 0)) 0
| of_add_left : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (m₁, n) + .of (m₂, n)) (.of (m₁ + m₂, n))
| of_add_right : ∀ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), Eqv (.of (m, n₁) + .of (m, n₂)) (.of (m, n₁ + n₂))
| of_smul : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (r • m, n)) (.of (m, r • n))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end
end TensorProduct
variable (R) in
/-- The tensor product of two modules `M` and `N` over the same commutative semiring `R`.
The localized notations are `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N`, accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def TensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).Quotient
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc TensorProduct] scoped[TensorProduct] infixl:100 " ⊗ " => TensorProduct _
@[inherit_doc] scoped[TensorProduct] notation:100 M " ⊗[" R "] " N:100 => TensorProduct R M N
namespace TensorProduct
section Module
protected instance zero : Zero (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).zero
protected instance add : Add (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).hasAdd
instance addZeroClass : AddZeroClass (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
/- The `toAdd` field is given explicitly as `TensorProduct.add` for performance reasons.
This avoids any need to unfold `Con.addMonoid` when the type checker is checking
that instance diagrams commute -/
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _ }
instance addSemigroup : AddSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _ }
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
add_comm := fun x y =>
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨0⟩
variable {M N}
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. The localized notations are `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n`,
accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗[R] N :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (m, n)
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
infixl:100 " ⊗ₜ " => tmul _
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
notation:100 x " ⊗ₜ[" R "] " y:100 => tmul R x y
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : M ⊗[R] N → Prop} (z : M ⊗[R] N)
(zero : motive 0)
(tmul : ∀ x y, motive <| x ⊗ₜ[R] y)
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) : motive z :=
AddCon.induction_on z fun x =>
FreeAddMonoid.recOn x zero fun ⟨m, n⟩ y ih => by
rw [AddCon.coe_add]
exact add _ _ (tmul ..) ih
/-- Lift an `R`-balanced map to the tensor product.
A map `f : M →+ N →+ P` additive in both components is `R`-balanced, or middle linear with respect
to `R`, if scalar multiplication in either argument is equivalent, `f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)`.
Note that strictly the first action should be a right-action by `R`, but for now `R` is commutative
so it doesn't matter. -/
-- TODO: use this to implement `lift` and `SMul.aux`. For now we do not do this as it causes
-- performance issues elsewhere.
def liftAddHom (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) :
M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift (fun mn : M × N => f mn.1 mn.2)) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero,
AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add,
AddMonoidHom.add_apply]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, hf]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem liftAddHom_tmul (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) (m : M) (n : N) :
liftAddHom f hf (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 : M) ⊗ₜ[R] n = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_left _
theorem add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_left _ _ _
variable (N) in
@[simp]
theorem tmul_zero (m : M) : m ⊗ₜ[R] (0 : N) = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_right _
theorem tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ[R] n₂ :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_right _ _ _
instance uniqueLeft [Subsingleton M] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0, zero_tmul]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
instance uniqueRight [Subsingleton N] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim y 0, tmul_zero]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
section
variable (R R' M N)
/-- A typeclass for `SMul` structures which can be moved across a tensor product.
This typeclass is generated automatically from an `IsScalarTower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `AddCommGroup.toIntModule`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`R` does not support negation.
Note that `Module R' (M ⊗[R] N)` is available even without this typeclass on `R'`; it's only
needed if `TensorProduct.smul_tmul`, `TensorProduct.smul_tmul'`, or `TensorProduct.tmul_smul` is
used.
-/
class CompatibleSMul [DistribMulAction R' N] : Prop where
smul_tmul : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n)
end
/-- Note that this provides the default `CompatibleSMul R R M N` instance through
`IsScalarTower.left`. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompatibleSMul.isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M]
[DistribMulAction R' N] [IsScalarTower R' R N] : CompatibleSMul R R' M N :=
⟨fun r m n => by
conv_lhs => rw [← one_smul R m]
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R n]
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc]
exact Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _⟩
/-- `smul` can be moved from one side of the product to the other . -/
theorem smul_tmul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
(r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n) :=
CompatibleSMul.smul_tmul _ _ _
private def addMonoidWithWrongNSMul : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with }
attribute [local instance] addMonoidWithWrongNSMul in
/-- Auxiliary function to defining scalar multiplication on tensor product. -/
def SMul.aux {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) →+ M ⊗[R] N :=
FreeAddMonoid.lift fun p : M × N => (r • p.1) ⊗ₜ p.2
theorem SMul.aux_of {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
SMul.aux r (.of (m, n)) = (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
rfl
variable [SMulCommClass R R' M] [SMulCommClass R R'' M]
/-- Given two modules over a commutative semiring `R`, if one of the factors carries a
(distributive) action of a second type of scalars `R'`, which commutes with the action of `R`, then
the tensor product (over `R`) carries an action of `R'`.
This instance defines this `R'` action in the case that it is the left module which has the `R'`
action. Two natural ways in which this situation arises are:
* Extension of scalars
* A tensor product of a group representation with a module not carrying an action
Note that in the special case that `R = R'`, since `R` is commutative, we just get the usual scalar
action on a tensor product of two modules. This special case is important enough that, for
performance reasons, we define it explicitly below. -/
instance leftHasSMul : SMul R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun r =>
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (SMul.aux r : _ →+ M ⊗[R] N) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, smul_zero, zero_tmul]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, tmul_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, smul_add, add_tmul]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, tmul_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [SMul.aux_of, SMul.aux_of, ← smul_comm, smul_tmul]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftHasSMul
protected theorem smul_zero (r : R') : r • (0 : M ⊗[R] N) = 0 :=
AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
protected theorem smul_add (r : R') (x y : M ⊗[R] N) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
protected theorem zero_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (0 : R'') • x = 0 :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, zero_smul, zero_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero]
protected theorem one_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (1 : R') • x = x :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, one_smul])
fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
protected theorem add_smul (r s : R'') (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero, add_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, add_smul, add_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addZeroClass _ _ with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _
nsmul := fun n v => n • v
nsmul_zero := by simp [TensorProduct.zero_smul]
nsmul_succ := by simp only [TensorProduct.one_smul, TensorProduct.add_smul, add_comm,
forall_const] }
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addCommSemigroup _ _ with
toAddMonoid := TensorProduct.addMonoid }
instance leftDistribMulAction : DistribMulAction R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
{ smul_add := fun r x y => TensorProduct.smul_add r x y
mul_smul := fun r s x =>
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, mul_smul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy]
one_smul := TensorProduct.one_smul
smul_zero := TensorProduct.smul_zero }
instance : DistribMulAction R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftDistribMulAction
theorem smul_tmul' (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) : r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tmul_smul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (x : M) (y : N) :
x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • x ⊗ₜ[R] y :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
theorem smul_tmul_smul (r s : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] (s • n) = (r * s) • m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul, mul_smul]
instance leftModule : Module R'' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ add_smul := TensorProduct.add_smul
zero_smul := TensorProduct.zero_smul }
instance : Module R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftModule
instance [Module R''ᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R'' M] : IsCentralScalar R'' (M ⊗[R] N) where
op_smul_eq_smul r x :=
x.induction_on (by rw [smul_zero, smul_zero])
(fun x y => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', op_smul_eq_smul]) fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
section
-- Like `R'`, `R'₂` provides a `DistribMulAction R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)`
variable {R'₂ : Type*} [Monoid R'₂] [DistribMulAction R'₂ M]
variable [SMulCommClass R R'₂ M]
/-- `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M` implies `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance smulCommClass_left [SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M] : SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N) where
smul_comm r' r'₂ x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul', smul_comm]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]; rw [ihx, ihy]
variable [SMul R'₂ R']
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_left [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
variable [DistribMulAction R'₂ N] [DistribMulAction R' N]
variable [CompatibleSMul R R'₂ M N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N]
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_right [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
end
/-- A short-cut instance for the common case, where the requirements for the `compatible_smul`
instances are sufficient. -/
instance isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M] : IsScalarTower R' R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.isScalarTower_left
-- or right
variable (R M N) in
/-- The canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mk : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· ⊗ₜ ·) add_tmul (fun c m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul])
tmul_add tmul_smul
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem ite_tmul (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(if P then x₁ else 0) ⊗ₜ[R] x₂ = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem tmul_ite (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(x₁ ⊗ₜ[R] if P then x₂ else 0) = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tmul_single {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
x ⊗ₜ[R] Pi.single i m j = (Pi.single i (x ⊗ₜ[R] m) : ∀ i, N ⊗[R] M i) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
lemma single_tmul {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
Pi.single i m j ⊗ₜ[R] x = (Pi.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] x) : ∀ i, M i ⊗[R] N) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
section
theorem sum_tmul {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (m : α → M) (n : N) :
(∑ a ∈ s, m a) ⊗ₜ[R] n = ∑ a ∈ s, m a ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, add_tmul, ih]
theorem tmul_sum (m : M) {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (n : α → N) :
(m ⊗ₜ[R] ∑ a ∈ s, n a) = ∑ a ∈ s, m ⊗ₜ[R] n a := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, tmul_add, ih]
end
variable (R M N)
/-- The simple (aka pure) elements span the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tmul_eq_top : Submodule.span R { t : M ⊗[R] N | ∃ m n, m ⊗ₜ n = t } = ⊤ := by
ext t; simp only [Submodule.mem_top, iff_true]
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro m n
apply Submodule.subset_span
use m, n
· intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact Submodule.add_mem _ ht₁ ht₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top : Submodule.map₂ (mk R M N) ⊤ ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2]
exact Submodule.span_mono fun _ ⟨m, n, h⟩ => ⟨m, trivial, n, trivial, h⟩
theorem exists_eq_tmul_of_forall (x : TensorProduct R M N)
(h : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), ∃ m n, m₁ ⊗ₜ n₁ + m₂ ⊗ₜ n₂ = m ⊗ₜ[R] n) :
∃ m n, x = m ⊗ₜ n := by
induction x with
| zero =>
use 0, 0
rw [TensorProduct.zero_tmul]
| tmul m n => use m, n
| add x y h₁ h₂ =>
obtain ⟨m₁, n₁, rfl⟩ := h₁
obtain ⟨m₂, n₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
apply h
end Module
variable [Module R P]
section UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P)
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def liftAux : M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
liftAddHom (LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom'.comp <| f.toAddMonoidHom)
fun r m n => by dsimp; rw [LinearMap.map_smul₂, map_smul]
theorem liftAux_tmul (m n) : liftAux f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem liftAux.smul (r : R) (x) : liftAux f (r • x) = r • liftAux f x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (smul_zero _).symm
(fun p q => by simp_rw [← tmul_smul, liftAux_tmul, (f p).map_smul])
fun p q ih1 ih2 => by simp_rw [smul_add, (liftAux f).map_add, ih1, ih2, smul_add]
variable (f) in
/-- Constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P` with the property that
its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ liftAux f with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
theorem ext' {g h : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
LinearMap.ext fun z =>
TensorProduct.induction_on z (by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_zero]) H fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [g.map_add, h.map_add, ihx, ihy]
theorem lift.unique {g : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) : g = lift f :=
ext' fun m n => by rw [H, lift.tmul]
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => rfl
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => by simp
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f := by
rw [lift_compr₂ f, lift_mk, LinearMap.comp_id]
/-- This used to be an `@[ext]` lemma, but it fails very slowly when the `ext` tactic tries to apply
it in some cases, notably when one wants to show equality of two linear maps. The `@[ext]`
attribute is now added locally where it is needed. Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of
`TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ _` and `N →ₗ _`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P} (H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h := by
rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
attribute [local ext high] ext
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P := fun m => flip fun f => f m
variable (R M N P) in
/-- Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def uncurry : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
LinearMap.flip <| lift <| LinearMap.lflip.comp (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n := by rw [uncurry, LinearMap.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; rfl
variable (R M N P)
/-- A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ uncurry R M N P with
invFun := fun f => (mk R M N).compr₂ f
left_inv := fun _ => LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _
right_inv := fun _ => ext' fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lift.equiv R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
uncurry_apply f m n
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_symm_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lcurry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : lcurry R M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
lcurry R M N P f
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) → M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :=
fun _ _ H => ext H
theorem ext_threefold {g h : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q}
(H : ∀ x y z, g (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext x y z
exact H x y z
-- We'll need this one for checking the pentagon identity!
theorem ext_fourfold {g h : ((M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, g (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext w x y z
exact H w x y z
/-- Two linear maps (M ⊗ N) ⊗ (P ⊗ Q) → S which agree on all elements of the
form (m ⊗ₜ n) ⊗ₜ (p ⊗ₜ q) are equal. -/
theorem ext_fourfold' {φ ψ : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, φ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z)) = ψ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z))) : φ = ψ := by
ext m n p q
exact H m n p q
end UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
section
variable (R M N)
/-- The tensor product of modules is commutative, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def comm : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip) (ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
(ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N) (m ⊗ₜ n) = n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N).symm (n ⊗ₜ m) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
lemma lift_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :
lift f ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = lift f.flip :=
ext rfl
end
section CompatibleSMul
variable (R A M N) [CommSemiring A] [Module A M] [Module A N] [SMulCommClass R A M]
[CompatibleSMul R A M N]
/-- If M and N are both R- and A-modules and their actions on them commute,
and if the A-action on `M ⊗[R] N` can switch between the two factors, then there is a
canonical A-linear map from `M ⊗[A] N` to `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul : M ⊗[A] N →ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] N :=
lift
{ toFun := fun m ↦
{ __ := mk R M N m
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ (smul_tmul _ _ _).symm }
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ LinearMap.ext <| by simp
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp] theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul (m n) : mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_surjective : Function.Surjective (mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N) :=
fun x ↦ x.induction_on (⟨0, map_zero _⟩) (fun m n ↦ ⟨_, mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul ..⟩)
fun _ _ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨x + y, by simpa using congr($hx + $hy)⟩
attribute [local instance] SMulCommClass.symm
/-- `mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N` is also R-linear. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul' : M ⊗[A] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N where
__ := mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N
map_smul' _ x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ by simp [smul_tmul'])
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
/-- If the R- and A-actions on M and N satisfy `CompatibleSMul` both ways,
then `M ⊗[A] N` is canonically isomorphic to `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def equivOfCompatibleSMul [CompatibleSMul A R M N] : M ⊗[A] N ≃ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] N where
__ := mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N
invFun := mapOfCompatibleSMul A R M N
left_inv x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
right_inv x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
omit [SMulCommClass R A M]
end CompatibleSMul
open LinearMap
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules. -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift <| comp (compl₂ (mk _ _ _) g) f
@[simp]
theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) : map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
/-- Given linear maps `f : M → P`, `g : N → Q`, if we identify `M ⊗ N` with `N ⊗ M` and `P ⊗ Q`
with `Q ⊗ P`, then this lemma states that `f ⊗ g = g ⊗ f`. -/
lemma map_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = TensorProduct.comm R Q P ∘ₗ map g f :=
ext rfl
lemma map_comm (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (x : N ⊗[R] M) :
map f g (TensorProduct.comm R N M x) = TensorProduct.comm R Q P (map g f x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp_comm_eq _ _) _
theorem map_range_eq_span_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
range (map f g) = Submodule.span R { t | ∃ m n, f m ⊗ₜ g n = t } := by
simp only [← Submodule.map_top, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map_span, Set.mem_image,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
congr; ext t
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩
use m, n
simp only [map_tmul]
· rintro ⟨m, n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [map_tmul]
/-- Given submodules `p ⊆ P` and `q ⊆ Q`, this is the natural map: `p ⊗ q → P ⊗ Q`. -/
@[simp]
def mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) : p ⊗[R] q →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
map p.subtype q.subtype
lemma range_mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) = Submodule.span R (Set.image2 (· ⊗ₜ ·) p q) := by
rw [mapIncl, map_range_eq_span_tmul]
congr; ext; simp
theorem map₂_eq_range_lift_comp_mapIncl (f : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] M)
(p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
Submodule.map₂ f p q = LinearMap.range (lift f ∘ₗ mapIncl p q) := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.range_comp, range_mapIncl, Submodule.map_span,
Set.image_image2, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2, lift.tmul]
section
variable {P' Q' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R P']
variable [AddCommMonoid Q'] [Module R Q']
theorem map_comp (f₂ : P →ₗ[R] P') (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] P) (g₂ : Q →ₗ[R] Q') (g₁ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
lemma range_mapIncl_mono {p p' : Submodule R P} {q q' : Submodule R Q} (hp : p ≤ p') (hq : q ≤ q') :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) ≤ LinearMap.range (mapIncl p' q') := by
simp_rw [range_mapIncl]
exact Submodule.span_mono (Set.image2_subset hp hq)
theorem lift_comp_map (i : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] Q') (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(lift i).comp (map f g) = lift ((i.comp f).compl₂ g) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
attribute [local ext high] ext
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (id : M →ₗ[R] M) (id : N →ₗ[R] N) = .id := by
ext
simp only [mk_apply, id_coe, compr₂_apply, _root_.id, map_tmul]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : map (1 : M →ₗ[R] M) (1 : N →ₗ[R] N) = 1 :=
map_id
protected theorem map_mul (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] N) :
map (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) = map f₁ g₁ * map f₂ g₂ :=
map_comp f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) :
map f g ^ n = map (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, TensorProduct.map_one]
| succ n ih => simp only [pow_succ', ih, TensorProduct.map_mul]
theorem map_add_left (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₁ + f₂) g = map f₁ g + map f₂ g := by
ext
simp only [add_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, add_apply]
theorem map_add_right (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f (g₁ + g₂) = map f g₁ + map f g₂ := by
ext
simp only [tmul_add, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, add_apply]
theorem map_smul_left (r : R) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map (r • f) g = r • map f g := by
ext
simp only [smul_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, smul_apply, tmul_smul]
theorem map_smul_right (r : R) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map f (r • g) = r • map f g := by
ext
simp only [smul_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, smul_apply, tmul_smul]
variable (R M N P Q)
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules, bilinear in both maps. -/
def mapBilinear : (M →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R map map_add_left map_smul_left map_add_right map_smul_right
/-- The canonical linear map from `P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q)` to `(M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q)` -/
def lTensorHomToHomLTensor : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
TensorProduct.lift (llcomp R M Q _ ∘ₗ mk R P Q)
/-- The canonical linear map from `(M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q` to `(M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q)` -/
def rTensorHomToHomRTensor : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
TensorProduct.lift (llcomp R M P _ ∘ₗ (mk R P Q).flip).flip
/-- The linear map from `(M →ₗ P) ⊗ (N →ₗ Q)` to `(M ⊗ N →ₗ P ⊗ Q)` sending `f ⊗ₜ g` to
the `TensorProduct.map f g`, the tensor product of the two maps. -/
def homTensorHomMap : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift (mapBilinear R M N P Q)
variable {R M N P Q}
/--
This is a binary version of `TensorProduct.map`: Given a bilinear map `f : M ⟶ P ⟶ Q` and a
bilinear map `g : N ⟶ S ⟶ T`, if we think `f` and `g` as linear maps with two inputs, then
`map₂ f g` is a bilinear map taking two inputs `M ⊗ N → P ⊗ S → Q ⊗ S` defined by
`map₂ f g (m ⊗ n) (p ⊗ s) = f m p ⊗ g n s`.
Mathematically, `TensorProduct.map₂` is defined as the composition
`M ⊗ N -map→ Hom(P, Q) ⊗ Hom(S, T) -homTensorHomMap→ Hom(P ⊗ S, Q ⊗ T)`.
-/
def map₂ (f : M →ₗ[R] P →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S →ₗ[R] T) :
M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] S →ₗ[R] Q ⊗[R] T :=
homTensorHomMap R _ _ _ _ ∘ₗ map f g
@[simp]
theorem mapBilinear_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : mapBilinear R M N P Q f g = map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensorHomToHomLTensor_apply (p : P) (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) :
lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q (p ⊗ₜ f) m = p ⊗ₜ f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensorHomToHomRTensor_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (q : Q) (m : M) :
rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q (f ⊗ₜ q) m = f m ⊗ₜ q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomMap_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
homTensorHomMap R M N P Q (f ⊗ₜ g) = map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_apply_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S →ₗ[R] T) (m : M) (n : N) :
map₂ f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = map (f m) (g n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero_left (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map (0 : M →ₗ[R] P) g = 0 :=
(mapBilinear R M N P Q).map_zero₂ _
@[simp]
theorem map_zero_right (f : M →ₗ[R] P) : map f (0 : N →ₗ[R] Q) = 0 :=
(mapBilinear R M N P Q _).map_zero
end
/-- If `M` and `P` are linearly equivalent and `N` and `Q` are linearly equivalent
then `M ⊗ N` and `P ⊗ Q` are linearly equivalent. -/
def congr (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext' fun m n => by simp)
(ext' fun m n => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem congr_tmul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
congr f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm_tmul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (p : P) (q : Q) :
(congr f g).symm (p ⊗ₜ q) = f.symm p ⊗ₜ g.symm q :=
rfl
theorem congr_symm (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) : (congr f g).symm = congr f.symm g.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem congr_refl_refl : congr (.refl R M) (.refl R N) = .refl R _ :=
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| ext' fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem congr_trans (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (f' : P ≃ₗ[R] S) (g' : Q ≃ₗ[R] T) :
congr (f ≪≫ₗ f') (g ≪≫ₗ g') = congr f g ≪≫ₗ congr f' g' :=
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| map_comp _ _ _ _
theorem congr_mul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (f' : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g' : N ≃ₗ[R] N) :
congr (f * f') (g * g') = congr f g * congr f' g' := congr_trans _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem congr_pow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) :
congr f g ^ n = congr (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => exact congr_refl_refl.symm
| succ n ih => simp_rw [pow_succ, ih, congr_mul]
@[simp] theorem congr_zpow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℤ) :
congr f g ^ n = congr (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact congr_pow _ _ _
| negSucc n => simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, congr_pow]; exact congr_symm _ _
end TensorProduct
open scoped TensorProduct
variable [Module R P]
namespace LinearMap
variable {N}
/-- `LinearMap.lTensor M f : M ⊗ N →ₗ M ⊗ P` is the natural linear map
induced by `f : N →ₗ P`. -/
def lTensor (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P :=
TensorProduct.map id f
/-- `LinearMap.rTensor M f : N₁ ⊗ M →ₗ N₂ ⊗ M` is the natural linear map
induced by `f : N₁ →ₗ N₂`. -/
def rTensor (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M :=
TensorProduct.map f id
variable (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) (f : N →ₗ[R] P)
theorem lTensor_def : f.lTensor M = TensorProduct.map LinearMap.id f := rfl
theorem rTensor_def : f.rTensor M = TensorProduct.map f LinearMap.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : f.lTensor M (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ f n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : f.rTensor M (n ⊗ₜ m) = f n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_comp_mk (m : M) :
f.lTensor M ∘ₗ TensorProduct.mk R M N m = TensorProduct.mk R M P m ∘ₗ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_comp_flip_mk (m : M) :
f.rTensor M ∘ₗ (TensorProduct.mk R N M).flip m = (TensorProduct.mk R P M).flip m ∘ₗ f :=
rfl
lemma comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R P Q ∘ₗ rTensor Q g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R Q N =
lTensor Q g :=
TensorProduct.ext rfl
lemma comm_comp_lTensor_comp_comm_eq (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R Q P ∘ₗ lTensor Q g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N Q =
rTensor Q g :=
TensorProduct.ext rfl
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is injective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is injective. -/
theorem lTensor_inj_iff_rTensor_inj :
Function.Injective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Injective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is surjective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is surjective. -/
theorem lTensor_surj_iff_rTensor_surj :
Function.Surjective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Surjective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is bijective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is bijective. -/
theorem lTensor_bij_iff_rTensor_bij :
Function.Bijective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Bijective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
open TensorProduct
attribute [local ext high] TensorProduct.ext
/-- `lTensorHom M` is the natural linear map that sends a linear map `f : N →ₗ P` to `M ⊗ f`.
See also `Module.End.lTensorAlgHom`. -/
def lTensorHom : (N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P where
toFun := lTensor M
map_add' f g := by
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, add_apply, lTensor_tmul, tmul_add]
map_smul' r f := by
dsimp
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, tmul_smul, smul_apply, lTensor_tmul]
/-- `rTensorHom M` is the natural linear map that sends a linear map `f : N →ₗ P` to `f ⊗ M`.
See also `Module.End.rTensorAlgHom`. -/
def rTensorHom : (N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M where
toFun f := f.rTensor M
map_add' f g := by
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, add_apply, rTensor_tmul, add_tmul]
map_smul' r f := by
dsimp
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, smul_tmul, tmul_smul, smul_apply, rTensor_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_lTensorHom : (lTensorHom M : (N →ₗ[R] P) → M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P) = lTensor M :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_rTensorHom : (rTensorHom M : (N →ₗ[R] P) → N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M) = rTensor M :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_add (f g : N →ₗ[R] P) : (f + g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M + g.lTensor M :=
(lTensorHom M).map_add f g
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_add (f g : N →ₗ[R] P) : (f + g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M + g.rTensor M :=
(rTensorHom M).map_add f g
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_zero : lTensor M (0 : N →ₗ[R] P) = 0 :=
(lTensorHom M).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_zero : rTensor M (0 : N →ₗ[R] P) = 0 :=
(rTensorHom M).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_smul (r : R) (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : (r • f).lTensor M = r • f.lTensor M :=
(lTensorHom M).map_smul r f
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_smul (r : R) (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : (r • f).rTensor M = r • f.rTensor M :=
(rTensorHom M).map_smul r f
theorem lTensor_comp : (g.comp f).lTensor M = (g.lTensor M).comp (f.lTensor M) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, comp_apply, lTensor_tmul]
theorem lTensor_comp_apply (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
(g.comp f).lTensor M x = (g.lTensor M) ((f.lTensor M) x) := by rw [lTensor_comp, coe_comp]; rfl
theorem rTensor_comp : (g.comp f).rTensor M = (g.rTensor M).comp (f.rTensor M) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, comp_apply, rTensor_tmul]
theorem rTensor_comp_apply (x : N ⊗[R] M) :
(g.comp f).rTensor M x = (g.rTensor M) ((f.rTensor M) x) := by rw [rTensor_comp, coe_comp]; rfl
theorem lTensor_mul (f g : Module.End R N) : (f * g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M * g.lTensor M :=
| lTensor_comp M f g
theorem rTensor_mul (f g : Module.End R N) : (f * g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M * g.rTensor M :=
rTensor_comp M f g
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 1,055 | 1,059 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
/-!
# Adjoining elements to form subalgebras
This file develops the basic theory of finitely-generated subalgebras.
## Definitions
* `FG (S : Subalgebra R A)` : A predicate saying that the subalgebra is finitely-generated
as an A-algebra
## Tags
adjoin, algebra, finitely-generated algebra
-/
universe u v w
open Subsemiring Ring Submodule
open Pointwise
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
{s t : Set A}
theorem fg_trans (h1 : (adjoin R s).toSubmodule.FG) (h2 : (adjoin (adjoin R s) t).toSubmodule.FG) :
(adjoin R (s ∪ t)).toSubmodule.FG := by
rcases fg_def.1 h1 with ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩
rcases fg_def.1 h2 with ⟨q, hq, hq'⟩
refine fg_def.2 ⟨p * q, hp.mul hq, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· rw [span_le, Set.mul_subset_iff]
intro x hx y hy
change x * y ∈ adjoin R (s ∪ t)
refine Subalgebra.mul_mem _ ?_ ?_
· have : x ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R s) := by
rw [← hp']
exact subset_span hx
exact adjoin_mono Set.subset_union_left this
have : y ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin (adjoin R s) t) := by
rw [← hq']
exact subset_span hy
change y ∈ adjoin R (s ∪ t)
rwa [adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin]
· intro r hr
change r ∈ adjoin R (s ∪ t) at hr
rw [adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin] at hr
change r ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin (adjoin R s) t) at hr
rw [← hq', ← Set.image_id q, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination (adjoin R s)] at hr
rcases hr with ⟨l, hlq, rfl⟩
have := @Finsupp.linearCombination_apply A A (adjoin R s)
rw [this, Finsupp.sum]
refine sum_mem ?_
intro z hz
change (l z).1 * _ ∈ _
have : (l z).1 ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R s) := (l z).2
rw [← hp', ← Set.image_id p, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination R] at this
rcases this with ⟨l2, hlp, hl⟩
have := @Finsupp.linearCombination_apply A A R
rw [this] at hl
rw [← hl, Finsupp.sum_mul]
refine sum_mem ?_
intro t ht
change _ * _ ∈ _
rw [smul_mul_assoc]
refine smul_mem _ _ ?_
exact subset_span ⟨t, hlp ht, z, hlq hz, rfl⟩
end Algebra
namespace Subalgebra
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
/-- A subalgebra `S` is finitely generated if there exists `t : Finset A` such that
`Algebra.adjoin R t = S`. -/
def FG (S : Subalgebra R A) : Prop :=
∃ t : Finset A, Algebra.adjoin R ↑t = S
theorem fg_adjoin_finset (s : Finset A) : (Algebra.adjoin R (↑s : Set A)).FG :=
⟨s, rfl⟩
theorem fg_def {S : Subalgebra R A} : S.FG ↔ ∃ t : Set A, Set.Finite t ∧ Algebra.adjoin R t = S :=
Iff.symm Set.exists_finite_iff_finset
theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : Subalgebra R A).FG :=
⟨∅, Finset.coe_empty ▸ Algebra.adjoin_empty R A⟩
theorem fg_of_fg_toSubmodule {S : Subalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule.FG → S.FG :=
fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ⟨t, le_antisymm
(Algebra.adjoin_le fun x hx ↦ show x ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule S from ht ▸ subset_span hx) <|
show Subalgebra.toSubmodule S ≤ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (Algebra.adjoin R ↑t) from fun x hx ↦
span_le.mpr (fun _ hx ↦ Algebra.subset_adjoin hx)
(show x ∈ span R ↑t by
rw [ht]
exact hx)⟩
theorem fg_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R A] (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG :=
fg_of_fg_toSubmodule (IsNoetherian.noetherian (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S))
theorem fg_of_submodule_fg (h : (⊤ : Submodule R A).FG) : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := h
⟨s, toSubmodule.injective <| by
rw [Algebra.top_toSubmodule, eq_top_iff, ← hs, span_le]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin⟩
theorem FG.prod {S : Subalgebra R A} {T : Subalgebra R B} (hS : S.FG) (hT : T.FG) :
(S.prod T).FG := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := fg_def.1 hS
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := fg_def.1 hT
rw [← hs.2, ← ht.2]
exact fg_def.2 ⟨LinearMap.inl R A B '' (s ∪ {1}) ∪ LinearMap.inr R A B '' (t ∪ {1}),
Set.Finite.union (Set.Finite.image _ (Set.Finite.union hs.1 (Set.finite_singleton _)))
(Set.Finite.image _ (Set.Finite.union ht.1 (Set.finite_singleton _))),
Algebra.adjoin_inl_union_inr_eq_prod R s t⟩
section
theorem FG.map {S : Subalgebra R A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hs : S.FG) : (S.map f).FG := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hs
classical
exact ⟨s.image f, by rw [Finset.coe_image, Algebra.adjoin_image, hs]⟩
end
theorem fg_of_fg_map (S : Subalgebra R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(hs : (S.map f).FG) : S.FG :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hs
⟨s.preimage f fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ hf h,
map_injective hf <| by
rw [← Algebra.adjoin_image, Finset.coe_preimage, Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset, hs]
rw [← AlgHom.coe_range, ← Algebra.adjoin_le_iff, hs, ← Algebra.map_top]
exact map_mono le_top⟩
theorem fg_top (S : Subalgebra R A) : (⊤ : Subalgebra R S).FG ↔ S.FG :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
rw [← S.range_val, ← Algebra.map_top]
exact FG.map _ h, fun h ↦
fg_of_fg_map _ S.val Subtype.val_injective <| by
rw [Algebra.map_top, range_val]
exact h⟩
theorem induction_on_adjoin [IsNoetherian R A] (P : Subalgebra R A → Prop) (base : P ⊥)
(ih : ∀ (S : Subalgebra R A) (x : A), P S → P (Algebra.adjoin R (insert x S)))
(S : Subalgebra R A) : P S := by
classical
| obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := S.fg_of_noetherian
refine Finset.induction_on t ?_ ?_
· simpa using base
intro x t _ h
rw [Finset.coe_insert]
simpa only [Algebra.adjoin_insert_adjoin] using ih _ x h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Adjoin/FG.lean | 161 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
/-!
# Algebraic properties of multiset intervals
This file provides results about the interaction of algebra with `Multiset.Ixx`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
lemma map_add_left_Icc (a b c : α) : (Icc a b).map (c + ·) = Icc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Icc, Icc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Icc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ico (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).map (c + ·) = Ico (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ico, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioc (a b c : α) : (Ioc a b).map (c + ·) = Ioc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioc, Ioc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioo (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).map (c + ·) = Ioo (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioo, Ioo, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioo, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
| lemma map_add_right_Icc (a b c : α) : ((Icc a b).map fun x => x + c) = Icc (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Icc _ _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 37 | 39 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is locally closed (e.g. open or closed), then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is
integrable on every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf k hk ↦ hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs with ⟨U, Z, hU, hZ, rfl⟩
rcases exists_compact_subset hU hx.1 with ⟨K, hK, hxK, hKU⟩
rw [nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hU.mem_nhds hx.1)]
refine ⟨Z ∩ K, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hxK), ?_⟩
exact hf (Z ∩ K) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨hKU hy.2, hy.1⟩) (.inter_left hK hZ)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by
rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem MemLp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩
refine ⟨U, hU, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
apply (hf.restrict U).mono_exponent hp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.locallyIntegrable := MemLp.locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ :=
(memLp_top_const c).locallyIntegrable le_top
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ => c) s μ :=
(locallyIntegrable_const c).locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem locallyIntegrable_zero : LocallyIntegrable (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) μ :=
(integrable_zero X E μ).locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_zero : LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) s μ :=
locallyIntegrable_zero.locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem LocallyIntegrable.indicator (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : LocallyIntegrable (s.indicator f) μ := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, h'U.indicator hs⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph [BorelSpace X] [BorelSpace Y] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) {f : Y → E}
{μ : Measure X} : LocallyIntegrable f (Measure.map e μ) ↔ LocallyIntegrable (f ∘ e) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x => ?_⟩
· rcases h (e x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e ⁻¹' U, e.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
exact (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).1 h'U
· rcases h (e.symm x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e.symm ⁻¹' U, e.symm.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
apply (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).2
simp only [Homeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv_coe]
convert h'U
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Homeomorph.symm_apply_apply]
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.add (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f + g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).add (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.sub (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f - g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).sub (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (-f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).neg
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
LocallyIntegrable (c • f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).smul c
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => LocallyIntegrable g μ) (fun _ _ => LocallyIntegrable.add)
locallyIntegrable_zero hf
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (fun a ↦ ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' s hf
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `g • f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_left_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → ℝ} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ g x • f x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ g x • f x) = (fun x ↦ g x • f x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_right
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `f • g` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_right_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X] {f : X → ℝ} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
{g : X → E} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x • g x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ f x • g x) = (fun x ↦ f x • g x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul_left]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_left
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
open Filter
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact :
Integrable f μ ↔ (IntegrableAtFilter f (cocompact X) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ) := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsc, hs⟩, hloc⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, htc, ht⟩ := mem_cocompact'.mp hsc
rewrite [← integrableOn_univ, ← compl_union_self s, integrableOn_union]
exact ⟨(hloc.integrableOn_isCompact htc).mono ht le_rfl, hs⟩
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔
(IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ) ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.integrableAtFilter _⟩, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact (IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff.mpr h.1).filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot_atTop
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [OrderTop X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact h.1.filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [OrderBot X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
variable {a : X}
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
haveI : Nonempty X := Nonempty.intro a
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hs.mono ha' le_rfl, ?_⟩).mono Iic_subset_Iic_union_Icc le_rfl
exact h.integrableOn_compact_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self isCompact_Icc
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
theorem integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMinOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[<] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨Iio a, Iio_mem_atBot a, h⟩, ⟨Iio a, self_mem_nhdsWithin, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩
· intro ⟨hbot, ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, hlocal⟩
obtain ⟨s', ⟨hs'_mono, hs'⟩⟩ := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨?_, hs.mono hs' le_rfl⟩).mono Iio_subset_Iic_union_Ioo le_rfl
exact integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot.mpr
⟨hbot, hlocal.mono_set (Iic_subset_Iio.mpr hs'_mono)⟩
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMaxOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[>] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
| integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin (X := Xᵒᵈ)
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
section borel
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 413 | 419 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
| irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 287 | 302 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Minimal polynomials
This file defines the minimal polynomial of an element `x` of an `A`-algebra `B`,
under the assumption that x is integral over `A`, and derives some basic properties
such as irreducibility under the assumption `B` is a domain.
-/
open Polynomial Set Function
variable {A B B' : Type*}
section MinPolyDef
variable (A) [CommRing A] [Ring B] [Algebra A B]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Suppose `x : B`, where `B` is an `A`-algebra.
The minimal polynomial `minpoly A x` of `x`
is a monic polynomial with coefficients in `A` of smallest degree that has `x` as its root,
if such exists (`IsIntegral A x`) or zero otherwise.
For example, if `V` is a `𝕜`-vector space for some field `𝕜` and `f : V →ₗ[𝕜] V` then
the minimal polynomial of `f` is `minpoly 𝕜 f`.
-/
@[stacks 09GM]
noncomputable def minpoly (x : B) : A[X] :=
if hx : IsIntegral A x then degree_lt_wf.min _ hx else 0
end MinPolyDef
namespace minpoly
section Ring
variable [CommRing A] [Ring B] [Ring B'] [Algebra A B] [Algebra A B']
variable {x : B}
/-- A minimal polynomial is monic. -/
theorem monic (hx : IsIntegral A x) : Monic (minpoly A x) := by
delta minpoly
rw [dif_pos hx]
exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).1
/-- A minimal polynomial is nonzero. -/
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial A] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x ≠ 0 :=
(monic hx).ne_zero
theorem eq_zero (hx : ¬IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x = 0 :=
dif_neg hx
theorem ne_zero_iff [Nontrivial A] : minpoly A x ≠ 0 ↔ IsIntegral A x :=
⟨fun h => of_not_not <| eq_zero.mt h, ne_zero⟩
theorem algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : B) :
minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x := by
classical
simp_rw [minpoly, isIntegral_algHom_iff _ hf, ← Polynomial.aeval_def, aeval_algHom,
AlgHom.comp_apply, _root_.map_eq_zero_iff f hf]
theorem algebraMap_eq {B} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra B B'] [IsScalarTower A B B']
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B B')) (x : B) :
minpoly A (algebraMap B B' x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B B') h x
@[simp]
theorem algEquiv_eq (f : B ≃ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') f.injective x
variable (A x)
/-- An element is a root of its minimal polynomial. -/
@[simp]
theorem aeval : aeval x (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
delta minpoly
split_ifs with hx
· exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).2
· exact aeval_zero _
/-- Given any `f : B →ₐ[A] B'` and any `x : L`, the minimal polynomial of `x` vanishes at `f x`. -/
@[simp]
theorem aeval_algHom (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : (Polynomial.aeval (f x)) (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
rw [Polynomial.aeval_algHom, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval, map_zero]
/-- A minimal polynomial is not `1`. -/
theorem ne_one [Nontrivial B] : minpoly A x ≠ 1 := by
intro h
refine (one_ne_zero : (1 : B) ≠ 0) ?_
simpa using congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) h
theorem map_ne_one [Nontrivial B] {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] (f : A →+* R) :
(minpoly A x).map f ≠ 1 := by
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· exact mt ((monic hx).eq_one_of_map_eq_one f) (ne_one A x)
· rw [eq_zero hx, Polynomial.map_zero]
exact zero_ne_one
/-- A minimal polynomial is not a unit. -/
theorem not_isUnit [Nontrivial B] : ¬IsUnit (minpoly A x) := by
haveI : Nontrivial A := (algebraMap A B).domain_nontrivial
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· exact mt (monic hx).eq_one_of_isUnit (ne_one A x)
· rw [eq_zero hx]
exact not_isUnit_zero
theorem mem_range_of_degree_eq_one (hx : (minpoly A x).degree = 1) :
x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
have h : IsIntegral A x := by
by_contra h
rw [eq_zero h, degree_zero, ← WithBot.coe_one] at hx
exact ne_of_lt (show ⊥ < ↑1 from WithBot.bot_lt_coe 1) hx
have key := minpoly.aeval A x
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hx, (minpoly.monic h).leadingCoeff, C_1, one_mul, aeval_add,
aeval_C, aeval_X, ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_neg] at key
exact ⟨-(minpoly A x).coeff 0, key.symm⟩
/-- The defining property of the minimal polynomial of an element `x`:
it is the monic polynomial with smallest degree that has `x` as its root. -/
theorem min {p : A[X]} (pmonic : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p := by
delta minpoly; split_ifs with hx
· exact le_of_not_lt (degree_lt_wf.not_lt_min _ hx ⟨pmonic, hp⟩)
· simp only [degree_zero, bot_le]
theorem unique' {p : A[X]} (hm : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(hl : ∀ q : A[X], degree q < degree p → q = 0 ∨ Polynomial.aeval x q ≠ 0) :
p = minpoly A x := by
nontriviality A
have hx : IsIntegral A x := ⟨p, hm, hp⟩
obtain h | h := hl _ ((minpoly A x).degree_modByMonic_lt hm)
swap
· exact (h <| (aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root hm hp).trans <| aeval A x).elim
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hm).1 h
rw [hr]
have hlead := congr_arg leadingCoeff hr
rw [mul_comm, leadingCoeff_mul_monic hm, (monic hx).leadingCoeff] at hlead
have : natDegree r ≤ 0 := by
have hr0 : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact ne_zero hx (mul_zero p ▸ hr)
apply_fun natDegree at hr
rw [hm.natDegree_mul' hr0] at hr
apply Nat.le_of_add_le_add_left
rw [add_zero]
exact hr.symm.trans_le (natDegree_le_natDegree <| min A x hm hp)
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero this, ← Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero this, ← leadingCoeff, ← hlead, C_1,
mul_one]
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton [Subsingleton B] : minpoly A x = 1 := by
nontriviality A
have := minpoly.min A x monic_one (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
rw [degree_one] at this
rcases le_or_lt (minpoly A x).degree 0 with h | h
· rwa [(monic ⟨1, monic_one, by simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]⟩ :
(minpoly A x).Monic).degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one] at h
· exact (this.not_lt h).elim
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing A]
section Ring
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B]
variable {x : B}
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial, as a natural number, is positive. -/
theorem natDegree_pos [Nontrivial B] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : 0 < natDegree (minpoly A x) := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero]
intro ndeg_eq_zero
have eq_one : minpoly A x = 1 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero ndeg_eq_zero]
convert C_1 (R := A)
simpa only [ndeg_eq_zero.symm] using (monic hx).leadingCoeff
simpa only [eq_one, map_one, one_ne_zero] using aeval A x
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial is positive. -/
theorem degree_pos [Nontrivial B] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : 0 < degree (minpoly A x) :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos hx)
section
variable [Nontrivial B]
open Polynomial in
theorem degree_eq_one_iff : (minpoly A x).degree = 1 ↔ x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
refine ⟨minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one _ _, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
haveI := Module.nontrivial A B
exact (degree_X_sub_C x ▸ minpoly.min A (algebraMap A B x) (monic_X_sub_C x) (by simp)).antisymm
(Nat.WithBot.add_one_le_of_lt <| minpoly.degree_pos isIntegral_algebraMap)
theorem natDegree_eq_one_iff :
(minpoly A x).natDegree = 1 ↔ x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one]
exact degree_eq_one_iff
theorem two_le_natDegree_iff (int : IsIntegral A x) :
2 ≤ (minpoly A x).natDegree ↔ x ∉ (algebraMap A B).range := by
rw [iff_not_comm, ← natDegree_eq_one_iff, not_le]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.trans_lt one_lt_two, fun h ↦ by linarith only [minpoly.natDegree_pos int, h]⟩
theorem two_le_natDegree_subalgebra {B} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Nontrivial B]
{S : Subalgebra A B} {x : B} (int : IsIntegral S x) : 2 ≤ (minpoly S x).natDegree ↔ x ∉ S := by
rw [two_le_natDegree_iff int, Iff.not]
apply Set.ext_iff.mp Subtype.range_val_subtype
end
/-- If `B/A` is an injective ring extension, and `a` is an element of `A`,
then the minimal polynomial of `algebraMap A B a` is `X - C a`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C_of_algebraMap_inj (a : A) (hf : Function.Injective (algebraMap A B)) :
minpoly A (algebraMap A B a) = X - C a := by
nontriviality A
refine (unique' A _ (monic_X_sub_C a) ?_ ?_).symm
· rw [map_sub, aeval_C, aeval_X, sub_self]
simp_rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro q hl h0
rw [← natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff h0, natDegree_X_sub_C, Nat.lt_one_iff] at hl
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hl] at h0 ⊢
rwa [aeval_C, map_ne_zero_iff _ hf, ← C_ne_zero]
end Ring
section IsDomain
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B]
variable {x : B}
/-- If `a` strictly divides the minimal polynomial of `x`, then `x` cannot be a root for `a`. -/
theorem aeval_ne_zero_of_dvdNotUnit_minpoly {a : A[X]} (hx : IsIntegral A x) (hamonic : a.Monic)
(hdvd : DvdNotUnit a (minpoly A x)) : Polynomial.aeval x a ≠ 0 := by
refine fun ha => (min A x hamonic ha).not_lt (degree_lt_degree ?_)
obtain ⟨_, c, hu, he⟩ := hdvd
have hcm := hamonic.of_mul_monic_left (he.subst <| monic hx)
rw [he, hamonic.natDegree_mul hcm]
-- TODO: port Nat.lt_add_of_zero_lt_left from lean3 core
apply lt_add_of_pos_right
refine (lt_of_not_le fun h => hu ?_)
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero h, ← Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h, ← leadingCoeff, hcm.leadingCoeff,
C_1]
exact isUnit_one
variable [IsDomain A] [IsDomain B]
| /-- A minimal polynomial is irreducible. -/
theorem irreducible (hx : IsIntegral A x) : Irreducible (minpoly A x) := by
refine (irreducible_of_monic (monic hx) <| ne_one A x).2 fun f g hf hg he => ?_
rw [← hf.isUnit_iff, ← hg.isUnit_iff]
by_contra! h
have heval := congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) he
rw [aeval A x, aeval_mul, mul_eq_zero] at heval
rcases heval with heval | heval
· exact aeval_ne_zero_of_dvdNotUnit_minpoly hx hf ⟨hf.ne_zero, g, h.2, he.symm⟩ heval
· refine aeval_ne_zero_of_dvdNotUnit_minpoly hx hg ⟨hg.ne_zero, f, h.1, ?_⟩ heval
rw [mul_comm, he]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Basic.lean | 258 | 269 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Left Homology of short complexes
Given a short complex `S : ShortComplex C`, which consists of two composable
maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`, we shall define
here the "left homology" `S.leftHomology` of `S`. For this, we introduce the
notion of "left homology data". Such an `h : S.LeftHomologyData` consists of the
data of morphisms `i : K ⟶ X₂` and `π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies
`K` with the kernel of `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃`, and that `π` identifies `H` with the cokernel
of the induced map `f' : X₁ ⟶ K`.
When such a `S.LeftHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasLeftHomology]`
and we define `S.leftHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen left homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.cycles` to be the `K` field.
The dual notion is defined in `RightHomologyData.lean`. In `Homology.lean`,
when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data (i.e. they give
the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define `[S.HasHomology]`
and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` and
`π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies `K` to the kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`,
and that `π` identifies `H` to the cokernel of the induced map `f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
structure LeftHomologyData where
/-- a choice of kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
K : C
/-- a choice of cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
H : C
/-- the inclusion of cycles in `S.X₂` -/
i : K ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the projection from cycles to the (left) homology -/
π : K ⟶ H
/-- the kernel condition for `i` -/
wi : i ≫ S.g = 0
/-- `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` is a kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi)
/-- the cokernel condition for `π` -/
wπ : hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι _ S.zero) ≫ π = 0
/-- `π : K ⟶ H` is a cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ π wπ)
initialize_simps_projections LeftHomologyData (-hi, -hπ)
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- The chosen kernels and cokernels of the limits API give a `LeftHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kernel S.g
H := cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)
i := kernel.ι _
π := cokernel.π _
wi := kernel.condition _
hi := kernelIsKernel _
wπ := cokernel.condition _
hπ := cokernelIsCokernel _
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wi wπ
variable {S}
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Mono h.i := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hi⟩
instance : Epi h.π := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hπ⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` that is a cycle (i.e. `k ≫ S.g = 0`) lifts
to a morphism `A ⟶ K` -/
def liftK (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.K := h.hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftK_i (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : h.liftK k hk ≫ h.i = k :=
h.hi.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.zero
/-- The (left) homology class `A ⟶ H` attached to a cycle `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` -/
@[simp]
def liftH (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.H := h.liftK k hk ≫ h.π
/-- Given `h : LeftHomologyData S`, this is morphism `S.X₁ ⟶ h.K` induced
by `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the fact that `h.K` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K := h.liftK S.f S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_i : h.f' ≫ h.i = S.f := liftK_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_π : h.f' ≫ h.π = 0 := h.wπ
@[reassoc]
lemma liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
h.liftK k (by rw [hx, assoc, S.zero, comp_zero]) ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = (x ≫ h.f') ≫ h.π by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, hx, liftK_i, assoc, f'_i]
/-- For `h : S.LeftHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hπ`, saying that
`π : h.K ⟶ h.H` is a cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
def hπ' : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ h.π h.f'_π) := h.hπ
/-- The morphism `H ⟶ A` induced by a morphism `k : K ⟶ A` such that `f' ≫ k = 0` -/
def descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.hπ.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.π ≫ h.descH k hk = k :=
h.hπ.fac (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk) WalkingParallelPair.one
lemma isIso_i (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.i :=
⟨h.liftK (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hg, id_comp]),
by simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, id_comp, assoc, liftK_i, comp_id], liftK_i _ _ _⟩
lemma isIso_π (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.π := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' h.hπ' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_mono h.i, comp_id, f'_i, zero_comp, hf])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, hφ, by rw [← cancel_epi h.π, reassoc_of% hφ, comp_id]⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := c.pt
i := 𝟙 _
π := c.π
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := CokernelCofork.condition _
hπ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).f' = S.f := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).i, f'_i,
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_i]
dsimp
rw [comp_id]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := c.pt
H := c.pt
i := c.ι
π := 𝟙 _
wi := KernelFork.condition _
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
wπ := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf])
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ (Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
(ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).i, f'_i, hf, zero_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a left homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
i := 𝟙 _
π := 𝟙 _
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := by
change S.f ≫ 𝟙 _ = 0
simp only [hf, zero_comp]
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
@[simp] lemma ofZeros_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((ofZeros S hf hg).i), zero_comp, f'_i, hf]
end LeftHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has left homology when there exists a `S.LeftHomologyData` -/
class HasLeftHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.LeftHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.LeftHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has left homology -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyData [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.LeftHomologyData := HasLeftHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasLeftHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : HasLeftHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasKernel_of_hasCokernel [HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.HasLeftHomology := HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasLeftHomology
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- Given left homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `LeftHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `K` (cycles)
and `H` (left homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure LeftHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on cycles -/
φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K
/-- the induced map on left homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `i` -/
commi : φK ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `f'` -/
commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `π` -/
commπ : h₁.π ≫ φH = φK ≫ h₂.π := by aesop_cat
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commi commf' commπ
/-- The left homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
LeftHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φK := 0
φH := 0
/-- The left homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of left homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
LeftHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φK := ψ.φK ≫ ψ'.φK
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hK : ψ₁.φK = ψ₂.φK := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, commi, commi]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.π, commπ, commπ, hK]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := h₂.liftK (h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂)
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm₂₃, h₁.wi_assoc, zero_comp])
have commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, assoc, LeftHomologyData.liftK_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i, φ.comm₁₂]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₁.descH (φK ≫ h₂.π)
(by rw [reassoc_of% commf', h₂.f'_π, comp_zero])
exact ⟨φK, φH, by simp [φK], commf', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φK {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φK = γ₂.φK := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on left homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commπ := comm.symm
commf' := by simp only [LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f', φ.comm₁₂]
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := f
φH := f
commi := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := c.π
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data
`LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φK := c.ι
φH := c.ι
end LeftHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The left homology of a short complex, given by the `H` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def leftHomology : C := S.leftHomologyData.H
-- `S.leftHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma leftHomologyData_H : S.leftHomologyData.H = S.leftHomology := rfl
/-- The cycles of a short complex, given by the `K` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def cycles : C := S.leftHomologyData.K
/-- The "homology class" map `S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyπ : S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology := S.leftHomologyData.π
/-- The inclusion `S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂ := S.leftHomologyData.i
/-- The "boundaries" map `S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles`. (Note that in this homology API, we make no use
of the "image" of this morphism, which under some categorical assumptions would be a subobject
of `S.X₂` contained in `S.cycles`.) -/
noncomputable def toCycles : S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles := S.leftHomologyData.f'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_g : S.iCycles ≫ S.g = 0 := S.leftHomologyData.wi
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i : S.toCycles ≫ S.iCycles = S.f := S.leftHomologyData.f'_i
instance : Mono S.iCycles := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi S.leftHomologyπ := by
dsimp only [leftHomologyπ]
infer_instance
lemma leftHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma leftHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A)
(h : S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [leftHomology_ext_iff] using h
lemma cycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma cycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) (h : f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles) :
f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [cycles_ext_iff] using h
lemma isIso_iCycles (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.iCycles :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_i _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.X₂` induced by `S.iCycles`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoX₂ (hg : S.g = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_iCycles hg
exact asIso S.iCycles
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.iCycles ≫ (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv ≫ S.iCycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_leftHomologyπ (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.leftHomologyπ :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_π _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology` induced
by `S.leftHomologyπ`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoLeftHomology (hf : S.f = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology := by
have := S.isIso_leftHomologyπ hf
exact asIso S.leftHomologyπ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ (S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv ≫ S.leftHomologyπ = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) left homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with left homology data. -/
def leftHomologyMapData : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced left homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def leftHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on cycles. -/
def cyclesMap' : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φK
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap'_i : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commi _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f'_cyclesMap' : h₁.f' ≫ cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, φ.comm₁₂, cyclesMap'_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality' :
h₁.π ≫ leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.π :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commπ _
end
section
variable [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (left) homology map `S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyMap : S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology :=
leftHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles := cyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.iCycles = S₁.iCycles ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_naturality : S₁.toCycles ≫ cyclesMap φ = φ.τ₁ ≫ S₂.toCycles :=
f'_cyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality :
S₁.leftHomologyπ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ = cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.leftHomologyπ :=
leftHomologyπ_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma leftHomologyMap'_eq : leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma cyclesMap'_eq : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φK :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φK (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end LeftHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
leftHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
leftHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
cyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
cyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
leftHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
leftHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
cyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
cyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = leftHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
leftHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.leftHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = cyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ cyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.cyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.cyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).cyclesMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φK]
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
leftHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = leftHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
cyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = cyclesMap φ₁ ≫ cyclesMap φ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] leftHomologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def leftHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := leftHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := leftHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `K` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def cyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.K ≅ h₂.K where
hom := cyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := cyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology where
hom := leftHomologyMap e.hom
inv := leftHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles where
hom := cyclesMap e.hom
inv := cyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : IsIso (cyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.leftHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyIso : S.leftHomology ≅ h.H :=
leftHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ h.K` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIso : S.cycles ≅ h.K :=
cyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIso_hom_comp_i : h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.i = S.iCycles := by
dsimp [iCycles, LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso]
simp only [cyclesMap'_i, id_τ₂, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIso_inv_comp_iCycles : h.cyclesIso.inv ≫ S.iCycles = h.i := by
simp only [← h.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_hom :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ h.leftHomologyIso.hom = h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.π := by
dsimp only [leftHomologyπ, leftHomologyIso, cyclesIso, leftHomologyMapIso',
cyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
| rw [← leftHomologyπ_naturality']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv :
h.π ≫ h.leftHomologyIso.inv = h.cyclesIso.inv ≫ S.leftHomologyπ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.cyclesIso.hom, ← cancel_mono h.leftHomologyIso.hom, assoc,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/LeftHomology.lean | 721 | 726 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,338 | 2,339 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
/-!
# Compositions
A composition of a natural number `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum
of positive integers. Combinatorially, it corresponds to a decomposition of `{0, ..., n-1}` into
non-empty blocks of consecutive integers, where the `iⱼ` are the lengths of the blocks.
This notion is closely related to that of a partition of `n`, but in a composition of `n` the
order of the `iⱼ`s matters.
We implement two different structures covering these two viewpoints on compositions. The first
one, made of a list of positive integers summing to `n`, is the main one and is called
`Composition n`. The second one is useful for combinatorial arguments (for instance to show that
the number of compositions of `n` is `2^(n-1)`). It is given by a subset of `{0, ..., n}`
containing `0` and `n`, where the elements of the subset (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost
points of each block. The main API is built on `Composition n`, and we provide an equivalence
between the two types.
## Main functions
* `c : Composition n` is a structure, made of a list of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
* `composition_card` states that the cardinality of `Composition n` is exactly
`2^(n-1)`, which is proved by constructing an equiv with `CompositionAsSet n` (see below), which
is itself in bijection with the subsets of `Fin (n-1)` (this holds even for `n = 0`, where `-` is
nat subtraction).
Let `c : Composition n` be a composition of `n`. Then
* `c.blocks` is the list of blocks in `c`.
* `c.length` is the number of blocks in the composition.
* `c.blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ` is the realization of `c.blocks` as a function on
`Fin c.length`. This is the main object when using compositions to understand the composition of
analytic functions.
* `c.sizeUpTo : ℕ → ℕ` is the sum of the size of the blocks up to `i`.;
* `c.embedding i : Fin (c.blocksFun i) → Fin n` is the increasing embedding of the `i`-th block in
`Fin n`;
* `c.index j`, for `j : Fin n`, is the index of the block containing `j`.
* `Composition.ones n` is the composition of `n` made of ones, i.e., `[1, ..., 1]`.
* `Composition.single n (hn : 0 < n)` is the composition of `n` made of a single block of size `n`.
Compositions can also be used to split lists. Let `l` be a list of length `n` and `c` a composition
of `n`.
* `l.splitWrtComposition c` is a list of lists, made of the slices of `l` corresponding to the
blocks of `c`.
* `join_splitWrtComposition` states that splitting a list and then joining it gives back the
original list.
* `splitWrtComposition_join` states that joining a list of lists, and then splitting it back
according to the right composition, gives back the original list of lists.
We turn to the second viewpoint on compositions, that we realize as a finset of `Fin (n+1)`.
`c : CompositionAsSet n` is a structure made of a finset of `Fin (n+1)` called `c.boundaries`
and proofs that it contains `0` and `n`. (Taking a finset of `Fin n` containing `0` would not
make sense in the edge case `n = 0`, while the previous description works in all cases).
The elements of this set (other than `n`) correspond to leftmost points of blocks.
Thus, there is an equiv between `Composition n` and `CompositionAsSet n`. We
only construct basic API on `CompositionAsSet` (notably `c.length` and `c.blocks`) to be able
to construct this equiv, called `compositionEquiv n`. Since there is a straightforward equiv
between `CompositionAsSet n` and finsets of `{1, ..., n-1}` (obtained by removing `0` and `n`
from a `CompositionAsSet` and called `compositionAsSetEquiv n`), we deduce that
`CompositionAsSet n` and `Composition n` are both fintypes of cardinality `2^(n - 1)`
(see `compositionAsSet_card` and `composition_card`).
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is in the construction of the composition of
formal multilinear series, and the proof that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The representation of a composition as a list is very handy as lists are very flexible and already
have a well-developed API.
## Tags
Composition, partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(combinatorics)>
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- A composition of `n` is a list of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
/-- List of positive integers summing to `n` -/
blocks : List ℕ
/-- Proof of positivity for `blocks` -/
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
/-- Proof that `blocks` sums to `n` -/
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
deriving DecidableEq
attribute [simp] Composition.blocks_sum
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n`, by seeing it as non-empty blocks of
consecutive integers in `{0, ..., n-1}`. We register every block by its left end-point, yielding
a finset containing `0`. As this does not make sense for `n = 0`, we add `n` to this finset, and
get a finset of `{0, ..., n}` containing `0` and `n`. This is the data in the structure
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n` as consecutive integers `{0, ..., n-1}` -/
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
/-- Proof that `0` is a member of `boundaries` -/
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
/-- Last element of the composition -/
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
deriving DecidableEq
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
attribute [simp] CompositionAsSet.zero_mem CompositionAsSet.getLast_mem
/-!
### Compositions
A composition of an integer `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum of
positive integers.
-/
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
/-- The length of a composition, i.e., the number of blocks in the composition. -/
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
/-- The blocks of a composition, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. When composing analytic
functions using compositions, this is the main player. -/
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
@[simp]
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
theorem blocks_le {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : i ≤ n := by
rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact List.le_sum_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) _)
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_le {n} (c : Composition n) (i : Fin c.length) :
c.blocksFun i ≤ n :=
c.blocks_le <| getElem_mem _
@[simp]
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
@[simp]
theorem blocks_eq_nil : c.blocks = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa using congr(List.sum $h)
· rintro rfl
rw [← length_eq_zero_iff, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact c.length_le
protected theorem length_eq_zero : c.length = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem length_pos_iff : 0 < c.length ↔ 0 < n := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_pos⟩ := length_pos_iff
/-- The sum of the sizes of the blocks in a composition up to `i`. -/
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_of_length_le h
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks[i] := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
/-- The `i`-th boundary of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of the `i`-th block. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
/-- The boundaries of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of all the blocks. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
/-- To `c : Composition n`, one can associate a `CompositionAsSet n` by registering the leftmost
point of each block, and adding a virtual point at the right of the last block. -/
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
/-- The canonical increasing bijection between `Fin (c.length + 1)` and `c.boundaries` is
exactly `c.boundary`. -/
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
/-- Embedding the `i`-th block of a composition (identified with `Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) into
`Fin n` at the relevant position. -/
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
/-- `index_exists` asserts there is some `i` with `j < c.sizeUpTo (i+1)`.
In the next definition `index` we use `Nat.find` to produce the minimal such index.
-/
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
/-- `c.index j` is the index of the block in the composition `c` containing `j`. -/
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
/-- Mapping an element `j` of `Fin n` to the element in the block containing it, identified with
`Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j))` through the canonical increasing bijection. -/
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
/-- The embeddings of different blocks of a composition are disjoint. -/
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff' {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ i = c.index j := by
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not]
intro h
exact Set.disjoint_right.1 (c.disjoint_range h) (c.mem_range_embedding j)
· intro h
rw [h]
exact c.mem_range_embedding j
theorem index_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
c.index (c.embedding i j) = i := by
symm
rw [← mem_range_embedding_iff']
apply Set.mem_range_self
theorem invEmbedding_comp (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.invEmbedding (c.embedding i j) : ℕ) = j := by
simp_rw [coe_invEmbedding, index_embedding, coe_embedding, add_tsub_cancel_left]
/-- Equivalence between the disjoint union of the blocks (each of them seen as
`Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) with `Fin n`. -/
def blocksFinEquiv : (Σi : Fin c.length, Fin (c.blocksFun i)) ≃ Fin n where
toFun x := c.embedding x.1 x.2
invFun j := ⟨c.index j, c.invEmbedding j⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨i, y⟩
dsimp
congr; · exact c.index_embedding _ _
rw [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
· exact c.invEmbedding_comp _ _
· rw [c.index_embedding]
right_inv j := c.embedding_comp_inv j
theorem blocksFun_congr {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (c₁ : Composition n₁) (c₂ : Composition n₂) (i₁ : Fin c₁.length)
(i₂ : Fin c₂.length) (hn : n₁ = n₂) (hc : c₁.blocks = c₂.blocks) (hi : (i₁ : ℕ) = i₂) :
c₁.blocksFun i₁ = c₂.blocksFun i₂ := by
cases hn
rw [← Composition.ext_iff] at hc
cases hc
congr
rwa [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- Two compositions (possibly of different integers) coincide if and only if they have the
same sequence of blocks. -/
theorem sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq {c : Σ n, Composition n} {c' : Σ n, Composition n} :
c = c' ↔ c.2.blocks = c'.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases c with ⟨n, c⟩
rcases c' with ⟨n', c'⟩
have : n = n' := by rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← c'.blocks_sum, H]
induction this
| congr
ext1
exact H
/-! ### The composition `Composition.ones` -/
/-- The composition made of blocks all of size `1`. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 443 | 450 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 278 | 281 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
/-!
# Types that are empty
In this file we define a typeclass `IsEmpty`, which expresses that a type has no elements.
## Main declaration
* `IsEmpty`: a typeclass that expresses that a type is empty.
-/
variable {α β γ : Sort*}
/-- `IsEmpty α` expresses that `α` is empty. -/
class IsEmpty (α : Sort*) : Prop where
protected false : α → False
instance Empty.instIsEmpty : IsEmpty Empty :=
⟨Empty.elim⟩
instance PEmpty.instIsEmpty : IsEmpty PEmpty :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
instance : IsEmpty False :=
⟨id⟩
instance Fin.isEmpty : IsEmpty (Fin 0) :=
⟨fun n ↦ Nat.not_lt_zero n.1 n.2⟩
instance Fin.isEmpty' : IsEmpty (Fin Nat.zero) :=
Fin.isEmpty
protected theorem Function.isEmpty [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) : IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun x ↦ IsEmpty.false (f x)⟩
theorem Function.Surjective.isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {f : α → β} (hf : f.Surjective) : IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun y ↦ let ⟨x, _⟩ := hf y; IsEmpty.false x⟩
-- See note [instance argument order]
instance {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, IsEmpty (p x)] [h : Nonempty α] : IsEmpty (∀ x, p x) :=
h.elim fun x ↦ Function.isEmpty <| Function.eval x
instance PProd.isEmpty_left [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (PProd α β) :=
Function.isEmpty PProd.fst
instance PProd.isEmpty_right [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty (PProd α β) :=
Function.isEmpty PProd.snd
instance Prod.isEmpty_left {α β} [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (α × β) :=
Function.isEmpty Prod.fst
instance Prod.isEmpty_right {α β} [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty (α × β) :=
Function.isEmpty Prod.snd
instance Quot.instIsEmpty {α : Sort*} [IsEmpty α] {r : α → α → Prop} : IsEmpty (Quot r) :=
Function.Surjective.isEmpty Quot.exists_rep
instance Quotient.instIsEmpty {α : Sort*} [IsEmpty α] {s : Setoid α} : IsEmpty (Quotient s) :=
Quot.instIsEmpty
instance [IsEmpty α] [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty (α ⊕' β) :=
⟨fun x ↦ PSum.rec IsEmpty.false IsEmpty.false x⟩
instance instIsEmptySum {α β} [IsEmpty α] [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨fun x ↦ Sum.rec IsEmpty.false IsEmpty.false x⟩
/-- subtypes of an empty type are empty -/
instance [IsEmpty α] (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x ↦ IsEmpty.false x.1⟩
/-- subtypes by an all-false predicate are false. -/
theorem Subtype.isEmpty_of_false {p : α → Prop} (hp : ∀ a, ¬p a) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x ↦ hp _ x.2⟩
/-- subtypes by false are false. -/
instance Subtype.isEmpty_false : IsEmpty { _a : α // False } :=
Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun _ ↦ id
instance Sigma.isEmpty_left {α} [IsEmpty α] {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) :=
Function.isEmpty Sigma.fst
example [h : Nonempty α] [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty (α → β) := by infer_instance
/-- Eliminate out of a type that `IsEmpty` (without using projection notation). -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def isEmptyElim [IsEmpty α] {p : α → Sort*} (a : α) : p a :=
(IsEmpty.false a).elim
theorem isEmpty_iff : IsEmpty α ↔ α → False :=
⟨@IsEmpty.false α, IsEmpty.mk⟩
namespace IsEmpty
open Function
universe u in
/-- Eliminate out of a type that `IsEmpty` (using projection notation). -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def elim {α : Sort u} (_ : IsEmpty α) {p : α → Sort*} (a : α) : p a :=
isEmptyElim a
/-- Non-dependent version of `IsEmpty.elim`. Helpful if the elaborator cannot elaborate `h.elim a`
correctly. -/
protected def elim' {β : Sort*} (h : IsEmpty α) (a : α) : β :=
(h.false a).elim
protected theorem prop_iff {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p :=
isEmpty_iff
variable [IsEmpty α]
@[simp]
theorem forall_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro isEmptyElim
@[simp]
theorem exists_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a, p a) ↔ False :=
iff_false_intro fun ⟨x, _⟩ ↦ IsEmpty.false x
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : Subsingleton α :=
⟨isEmptyElim⟩
end IsEmpty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff : ¬Nonempty α ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ h ⟨x⟩⟩, fun h1 h2 ↦ h2.elim h1.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_isEmpty_iff : ¬IsEmpty α ↔ Nonempty α :=
not_iff_comm.mp not_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_Prop {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prop]
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pi {π : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (∀ a, π a) ↔ ∃ a, IsEmpty (π a) := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, Classical.nonempty_pi, not_forall]
theorem isEmpty_fun : IsEmpty (α → β) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
rw [isEmpty_pi, ← exists_true_iff_nonempty, ← exists_and_right, true_and]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_fun : Nonempty (α → β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty β :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by rw [not_or, not_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff, isEmpty_fun, not_isEmpty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sigma {α} {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sigma, not_exists]
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psigma {α} {E : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (PSigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psigma, not_exists]
theorem isEmpty_subtype (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) ↔ ∀ x, ¬p x := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_subtype, not_exists]
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_prod {α β : Type*} : IsEmpty (α × β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prod, not_and_or]
| @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pprod : IsEmpty (PProd α β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
| Mathlib/Logic/IsEmpty.lean | 171 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Projection from cardinal numbers to natural numbers
In this file we define `Cardinal.toNat` to be the natural projection `Cardinal → ℕ`,
sending all infinite cardinals to zero.
We also prove basic lemmas about this definition.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Cardinal
variable {α : Type u} {c d : Cardinal.{u}}
/-- This function sends finite cardinals to the corresponding natural, and infinite cardinals
to 0. -/
noncomputable def toNat : Cardinal →*₀ ℕ :=
ENat.toNatHom.comp toENat
@[simp] lemma toNat_toENat (a : Cardinal) : ENat.toNat (toENat a) = toNat a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) : toNat n = ENat.toNat n :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| toENat_ofENat n
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem toNat_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNat n = n := toNat_ofENat n
@[simp]
lemma toNat_eq_zero : toNat c = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
| rw [← toNat_toENat, ENat.toNat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_top]
lemma toNat_ne_zero : toNat c ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := by simp [not_or]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ToNat.lean | 40 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.SmoothNumbers
/-!
# Euler Products
The main result in this file is `EulerProduct.eulerProduct_hasProd`, which says that
if `f : ℕ → R` is norm-summable, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring and `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments with `f 0 = 0`, then
`∏' p : Primes, ∑' e : ℕ, f (p^e)` converges to `∑' n, f n`.
`ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_hasProd` is a version
for multiplicative arithmetic functions in the sense of
`ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative`.
There is also a version `EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_hasProd`,
which states that `∏' p : Primes, (1 - f p)⁻¹` converges to `∑' n, f n`
when `f` is completely multiplicative with values in a complete normed field `F`
(implemented as `f : ℕ →*₀ F`).
There are variants stating the equality of the infinite product and the infinite sum
(`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_tprod`, `ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_tprod`,
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_tprod`) and also variants stating
the convergence of the sequence of partial products over primes `< n`
(`EulerProduct.eulerProduct`, `ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct`,
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative`.)
An intermediate step is `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum`
(and its variant `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric`),
which relates the finite product over primes `p ∈ s` to the sum of `f n` over `s`-factored `n`,
for `s : Finset ℕ`.
## Tags
Euler product, multiplicative function
-/
/-- If `f` is multiplicative and summable, then its values at natural numbers `> 1`
have norm strictly less than `1`. -/
lemma Summable.norm_lt_one {F : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing F] [CompleteSpace F] {f : ℕ →* F}
(hsum : Summable f) {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
‖f p‖ < 1 := by
refine summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one.mp ?_
simp_rw [← map_pow]
exact hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp
open scoped Topology
open Nat Finset
section General
/-!
### General Euler Products
In this section we consider multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions `f : ℕ → R`,
where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring. The main result is `EulerProduct.eulerProduct`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [NormedCommRing R] {f : ℕ → R}
-- local instance to speed up typeclass search
@[local instance] private lemma instT0Space : T0Space R := MetricSpace.instT0Space
variable [CompleteSpace R]
namespace EulerProduct
variable (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) (hmul : ∀ {m n}, Nat.Coprime m n → f (m * n) = f m * f n)
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- We relate a finite product over primes in `s` to an infinite sum over `s`-factored numbers. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum
(hsum : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖)) (s : Finset ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ f m)
(∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n)) := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
rw [factoredNumbers_empty]
simp only [not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, filter_true_of_mem, prod_empty]
exact ⟨(Set.finite_singleton 1).summable (‖f ·‖), hf₁ ▸ hasSum_singleton 1 f⟩
| insert p s hp ih =>
rw [filter_insert]
split_ifs with hpp
· constructor
· simp only [← (equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hpp hp).summable_iff, Function.comp_def,
equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply', factoredNumbers.map_prime_pow_mul hmul hpp hp]
refine Summable.of_nonneg_of_le (fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun _ ↦ norm_mul_le ..) ?_
apply Summable.mul_of_nonneg (hsum hpp) ih.1 <;> exact fun n ↦ norm_nonneg _
· have hp' : p ∉ {p ∈ s | p.Prime} := mt (mem_of_mem_filter p) hp
rw [prod_insert hp', ← (equivProdNatFactoredNumbers hpp hp).hasSum_iff, Function.comp_def]
conv =>
enter [1, x]
rw [equivProdNatFactoredNumbers_apply', factoredNumbers.map_prime_pow_mul hmul hpp hp]
have : T3Space R := instT3Space -- speeds up the following
apply (hsum hpp).of_norm.hasSum.mul ih.2
-- `exact summable_mul_of_summable_norm (hsum hpp) ih.1` gives a time-out
apply summable_mul_of_summable_norm (hsum hpp) ih.1
· rwa [factoredNumbers_insert s hpp]
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- A version of `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum`
in terms of the value of the series. -/
lemma prod_filter_prime_tsum_eq_tsum_factoredNumbers (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (s : Finset ℕ) :
∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∑' m : factoredNumbers s, f m :=
(summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum hf₁ hmul
(fun hp ↦ hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt) _).2.tsum_eq.symm
/-- The following statement says that summing over `s`-factored numbers such that
`s` contains `primesBelow N` for large enough `N` gets us arbitrarily close to the sum
over all natural numbers (assuming `f` is summable and `f 0 = 0`; the latter since
`0` is not `s`-factored). -/
lemma norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt (hsum : Summable f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) {ε : ℝ}
(εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ N : ℕ, ∀ s : Finset ℕ, primesBelow N ≤ s →
‖(∑' m : ℕ, f m) - ∑' m : factoredNumbers s, f m‖ < ε := by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ :=
summable_iff_nat_tsum_vanishing.mp hsum (Metric.ball 0 ε) <| Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 εpos
simp_rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at hN
refine ⟨N, fun s hs ↦ ?_⟩
have := hN _ <| factoredNumbers_compl hs
rwa [← hsum.tsum_subtype_add_tsum_subtype_compl (factoredNumbers s),
add_sub_cancel_left, tsum_eq_tsum_diff_singleton (factoredNumbers s)ᶜ hf₀]
-- Versions of the three lemmas above for `smoothNumbers N`
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- We relate a finite product over primes to an infinite sum over smooth numbers. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum
(hsum : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable (fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖)) (N : ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : N.smoothNumbers ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : N.smoothNumbers ↦ f m) (∏ p ∈ N.primesBelow, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n)) := by
rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers, primesBelow]
exact summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum hf₁ hmul hsum _
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- A version of `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum`
in terms of the value of the series. -/
lemma prod_primesBelow_tsum_eq_tsum_smoothNumbers (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (N : ℕ) :
∏ p ∈ N.primesBelow, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∑' m : N.smoothNumbers, f m :=
(summable_and_hasSum_smoothNumbers_prod_primesBelow_tsum hf₁ hmul
(fun hp ↦ hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt) _).2.tsum_eq.symm
/-- The following statement says that summing over `N`-smooth numbers
for large enough `N` gets us arbitrarily close to the sum over all natural numbers
(assuming `f` is norm-summable and `f 0 = 0`; the latter since `0` is not smooth). -/
lemma norm_tsum_smoothNumbers_sub_tsum_lt (hsum : Summable f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
{ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ N₀ : ℕ, ∀ N ≥ N₀, ‖(∑' m : ℕ, f m) - ∑' m : N.smoothNumbers, f m‖ < ε := by
conv => enter [1, N₀, N]; rw [smoothNumbers_eq_factoredNumbers]
obtain ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩ := norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt hsum hf₀ εpos
refine ⟨N₀, fun N hN ↦ hN₀ (range N) fun p hp ↦ ?_⟩
exact mem_range.mpr <| (lt_of_mem_primesBelow hp).trans_le hN
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. This version is stated using `HasProd`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_hasProd (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
HasProd (fun p : Primes ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) := by
let F : ℕ → R := fun n ↦ ∑' e, f (n ^ e)
change HasProd (F ∘ Subtype.val) _
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator,
show Set.mulIndicator (fun p : ℕ ↦ Irreducible p) = {p | Nat.Prime p}.mulIndicator from rfl,
HasProd, Metric.tendsto_atTop]
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩ := norm_tsum_factoredNumbers_sub_tsum_lt hsum.of_norm hf₀ hε
refine ⟨range N₀, fun s hs ↦ ?_⟩
have : ∏ p ∈ s, {p | Nat.Prime p}.mulIndicator F p = ∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, F p :=
prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter s (fun _ ↦ F) _ id
rw [this, dist_eq_norm, prod_filter_prime_tsum_eq_tsum_factoredNumbers hf₁ hmul hsum,
norm_sub_rev]
exact hN₀ s fun p hp ↦ hs <| mem_range.mpr <| lt_of_mem_primesBelow hp
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` i
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : ℕ, if p.Prime then ∑' e, f (p ^ e) else 1 = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated using `HasProd` and `Set.mulIndicator`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_hasProd_mulIndicator (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
HasProd (Set.mulIndicator {p | Nat.Prime p} fun p ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) := by
rw [← hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator]
exact eulerProduct_hasProd hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀
open Filter in
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : {p : ℕ | p.Prime}, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This is a version using convergence of finite partial products. -/
theorem eulerProduct (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
have := (eulerProduct_hasProd_mulIndicator hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀).tendsto_prod_nat
let F : ℕ → R := fun p ↦ ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e)
have H (n : ℕ) : ∏ i ∈ range n, Set.mulIndicator {p | Nat.Prime p} F i =
∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e) :=
prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (range n) (fun _ ↦ F) (fun _ ↦ {p | Nat.Prime p}) id
simpa only [F, H]
include hf₁ hmul in
/-- The *Euler Product* for multiplicative (on coprime arguments) functions.
If `f : ℕ → R`, where `R` is a complete normed commutative ring, `f 0 = 0`, `f 1 = 1`, `f` is
multiplicative on coprime arguments, and `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : {p : ℕ | p.Prime}, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. -/
theorem eulerProduct_tprod (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) :
∏' p : Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n :=
(eulerProduct_hasProd hf₁ hmul hsum hf₀).tprod_eq
end EulerProduct
/-!
### Versions for arithmetic functions
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open EulerProduct
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated in terms of `HasProd`. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_hasProd {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
HasProd (fun p : Primes ↦ ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) (∑' n, f n) :=
eulerProduct_hasProd hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
open Filter in
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`.
This version is stated in the form of convergence of finite partial products. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∏ p ∈ primesBelow n, ∑' e, f (p ^ e)) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) :=
eulerProduct hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
/-- The *Euler Product* for a multiplicative arithmetic function `f` with values in a
complete normed commutative ring `R`: if `‖f ·‖` is summable, then
`∏' p : Nat.Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n`. -/
nonrec theorem IsMultiplicative.eulerProduct_tprod {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (hsum : Summable (‖f ·‖)) :
∏' p : Primes, ∑' e, f (p ^ e) = ∑' n, f n :=
eulerProduct_tprod hf.1 hf.2 hsum f.map_zero
end ArithmeticFunction
end General
section CompletelyMultiplicative
/-!
### Euler Products for completely multiplicative functions
We now assume that `f` is completely multiplicative and has values in a complete normed field `F`.
Then we can use the formula for geometric series to simplify the statement. This leads to
`EulerProduct.eulerProduct_completely_multiplicative_hasProd` and variants.
-/
variable {F : Type*} [NormedField F] [CompleteSpace F]
namespace EulerProduct
-- a helper lemma that is useful below
lemma one_sub_inv_eq_geometric_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ →*₀ F} {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime)
(hsum : Summable fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) :
(1 - f p)⁻¹ = ∑' (e : ℕ), f (p ^ e) := by
simp only [map_pow]
refine (tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one <| summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one.mp ?_).symm
refine Summable.of_norm ?_
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_pow]
using hsum.comp_injective <| Nat.pow_right_injective hp.one_lt
/-- Given a (completely) multiplicative function `f : ℕ → F`, where `F` is a normed field,
such that `‖f p‖ < 1` for all primes `p`, we can express the sum of `f n` over all `s`-factored
positive integers `n` as a product of `(1 - f p)⁻¹` over the primes `p ∈ s`. At the same time,
we show that the sum involved converges absolutely. -/
lemma summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric {f : ℕ →* F}
(h : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → ‖f p‖ < 1) (s : Finset ℕ) :
Summable (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ ‖f m‖) ∧
HasSum (fun m : factoredNumbers s ↦ f m) (∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, (1 - f p)⁻¹) := by
have hmul {m n} (_ : Nat.Coprime m n) := f.map_mul m n
have H₁ :
∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, ∑' n : ℕ, f (p ^ n) = ∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, (1 - f p)⁻¹ := by
refine prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ ?_
simp only [map_pow]
exact tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one <| h (mem_filter.mp hp).2
have H₂ : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p.Prime → Summable fun n ↦ ‖f (p ^ n)‖ := by
intro p hp
simp only [map_pow]
refine Summable.of_nonneg_of_le (fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun _ ↦ norm_pow_le ..) ?_
exact summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one.mpr <| (norm_norm (f p)).symm ▸ h hp
exact H₁ ▸ summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_tsum f.map_one hmul H₂ s
/-- A version of `EulerProduct.summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric`
in terms of the value of the series. -/
lemma prod_filter_prime_geometric_eq_tsum_factoredNumbers {f : ℕ →* F} (hsum : Summable f)
(s : Finset ℕ) :
∏ p ∈ s with p.Prime, (1 - f p)⁻¹ = ∑' m : factoredNumbers s, f m := by
refine (summable_and_hasSum_factoredNumbers_prod_filter_prime_geometric ?_ s).2.tsum_eq.symm
| exact fun {_} hp ↦ hsum.norm_lt_one hp.one_lt
/-- Given a (completely) multiplicative function `f : ℕ → F`, where `F` is a normed field,
such that `‖f p‖ < 1` for all primes `p`, we can express the sum of `f n` over all `N`-smooth
positive integers `n` as a product of `(1 - f p)⁻¹` over the primes `p < N`. At the same time,
we show that the sum involved converges absolutely. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/EulerProduct/Basic.lean | 317 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
/-!
# Almost everywhere measurable functions
A function is almost everywhere measurable if it coincides almost everywhere with a measurable
function. This property, called `AEMeasurable f μ`, is defined in the file `MeasureSpaceDef`.
We discuss several of its properties that are analogous to properties of measurable functions.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Filter Set Function ENNReal
variable {ι α β γ δ R : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ] {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
section
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.aemeasurable [Subsingleton α] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
Subsingleton.measurable.aemeasurable
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
(measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f).aemeasurable
@[simp, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_zero_measure : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
exact ⟨fun _ => f default, measurable_const, rfl⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem aemeasurable_id'' (μ : Measure α) {m : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) :
@AEMeasurable α α m m0 id μ :=
@Measurable.aemeasurable α α m0 m id μ (measurable_id'' hm)
lemma aemeasurable_of_map_neZero {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} (h : NeZero (μ.map f)) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
by_contra h'
simp [h'] at h
namespace AEMeasurable
lemma mono_ac (hf : AEMeasurable f ν) (hμν : μ ≪ ν) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, hμν.ae_le hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem mono_measure (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≤ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
mono_ac h h'.absolutelyContinuous
theorem mono_set {s t} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict t)) :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
ht.mono_measure (restrict_mono h le_rfl)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem mono' (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≪ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, h' h.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem ae_mem_imp_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = h.mk f x :=
ae_imp_of_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
theorem ae_inf_principal_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) : f =ᶠ[ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s] h.mk f :=
le_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
@[measurability]
theorem sum_measure [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} (h : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i)) :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) := by
classical
nontriviality β
inhabit β
set s : ι → Set α := fun i => toMeasurable (μ i) { x | f x ≠ (h i).mk f x }
have hsμ : ∀ i, μ i (s i) = 0 := by
intro i
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact (h i).ae_eq_mk
have hsm : MeasurableSet (⋂ i, s i) :=
MeasurableSet.iInter fun i => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
have hs : ∀ i x, x ∉ s i → f x = (h i).mk f x := by
intro i x hx
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ hx
set g : α → β := (⋂ i, s i).piecewise (const α default) f
refine ⟨g, measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hsm ?_ ?_, ae_sum_iff.mpr fun i => ?_⟩
· rw [restrict_piecewise]
simp only [s, Set.restrict, const]
exact measurable_const
· rw [restrict_piecewise_compl, compl_iInter]
intro t ht
refine ⟨⋃ i, (h i).mk f ⁻¹' t ∩ (s i)ᶜ, MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i ↦
(measurable_mk _ ht).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.restrict, mem_inter_iff,
mem_compl_iff] at hx ⊢
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hxt, hxs⟩
rwa [hs _ _ hxs]
· rcases hx with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [hs _ _ hi]
exact fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩
· refine measure_mono_null (fun x (hx : f x ≠ g x) => ?_) (hsμ i)
contrapose! hx
refine (piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ ?_).symm
exact fun h => hx (mem_iInter.1 h i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) ↔ ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i) :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono_measure (le_sum _ _), sum_measure⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_add_measure_iff :
AEMeasurable f (μ + ν) ↔ AEMeasurable f μ ∧ AEMeasurable f ν := by
rw [← sum_cond, aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff, Bool.forall_bool, and_comm]
rfl
@[measurability]
theorem add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : AEMeasurable f μ) (hν : AEMeasurable f ν) :
AEMeasurable f (μ + ν) :=
aemeasurable_add_measure_iff.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s i))) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) :=
(sum_measure h).mono_measure <| restrict_iUnion_le
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) ↔ ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono_measure <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) le_rfl, AEMeasurable.iUnion⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_union_iff {s t : Set α} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) ↔
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ∧ AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict t) := by
simp only [union_eq_iUnion, aemeasurable_iUnion_iff, Bool.forall_bool, cond, and_comm]
@[measurability]
theorem smul_measure [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : R) : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, ae_smul_measure h.ae_eq_mk c⟩
theorem comp_aemeasurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.map f))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
⟨hg.mk g ∘ hf.mk f, hg.measurable_mk.comp hf.measurable_mk,
(ae_eq_comp hf hg.ae_eq_mk).trans (hf.ae_eq_mk.fun_comp (mk g hg))⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem comp_aemeasurable' {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.map f))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ g (f x)) μ := comp_aemeasurable hg hf
theorem comp_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.map f))
(hf : Measurable f) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable
theorem comp_quasiMeasurePreserving {ν : Measure δ} {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g ν)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
(hg.mono' hf.absolutelyContinuous).comp_measurable hf.measurable
theorem map_map_of_aemeasurable {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : (μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) := by
ext1 s hs
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hg hs, map_apply₀ hf (hg.nullMeasurable hs),
map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hg.comp_aemeasurable hf) hs, preimage_comp]
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem prodMk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x, g x)) μ :=
⟨fun a => (hf.mk f a, hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.prodMk hg.measurable_mk,
hf.ae_eq_mk.prodMk hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")]
alias prod_mk := prodMk
theorem exists_ae_eq_range_subset (H : AEMeasurable f μ) {t : Set β} (ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t)
(h₀ : t.Nonempty) : ∃ g, Measurable g ∧ range g ⊆ t ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
classical
let s : Set α := toMeasurable μ { x | f x = H.mk f x ∧ f x ∈ t }ᶜ
let g : α → β := piecewise s (fun _ => h₀.some) (H.mk f)
refine ⟨g, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact Measurable.piecewise (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) measurable_const H.measurable_mk
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [g, hx] using h₀.some_mem
· simp only [g, hx, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
contrapose! hx
apply subset_toMeasurable
simp +contextual only [hx, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_and,
not_false_iff, imp_true_iff]
· have A : μ (toMeasurable μ { x | f x = H.mk f x ∧ f x ∈ t }ᶜ) = 0 := by
rw [measure_toMeasurable, ← compl_mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
exact H.ae_eq_mk.and ht
filter_upwards [compl_mem_ae_iff.2 A] with x hx
rw [mem_compl_iff] at hx
simp only [s, g, hx, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
contrapose! hx
apply subset_toMeasurable
simp only [hx, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, false_and, not_false_iff]
theorem exists_measurable_nonneg {β} [Preorder β] [Zero β] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (f_nn : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, 0 ≤ f t) : ∃ g, Measurable g ∧ 0 ≤ g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
obtain ⟨G, hG_meas, hG_mem, hG_ae_eq⟩ := hf.exists_ae_eq_range_subset f_nn ⟨0, le_rfl⟩
exact ⟨G, hG_meas, fun x => hG_mem (mem_range_self x), hG_ae_eq⟩
theorem subtype_mk (h : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} {hfs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s} :
AEMeasurable (codRestrict f s hfs) μ := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
obtain ⟨g, g_meas, hg, fg⟩ : ∃ g : α → β, Measurable g ∧ range g ⊆ s ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.exists_ae_eq_range_subset (Eventually.of_forall hfs) ⟨_, hfs default⟩
refine ⟨codRestrict g s fun x => hg (mem_range_self _), Measurable.subtype_mk g_meas, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [fg] with x hx
simpa [Subtype.ext_iff]
end AEMeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_const' (h : ∀ᵐ (x) (y) ∂μ, f x = f y) : AEMeasurable f μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with (rfl | hμ)
· exact aemeasurable_zero_measure
· haveI := ae_neBot.2 hμ
rcases h.exists with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨const α (f x), measurable_const, EventuallyEq.symm hx⟩
open scoped Interval in
theorem aemeasurable_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {f : α → β} {a b : α} :
(AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ι a b) ↔
(AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ioc a b) ∧ (AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ioc b a) := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, aemeasurable_union_iff]
theorem aemeasurable_iff_measurable [μ.IsComplete] : AEMeasurable f μ ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.nullMeasurable.measurable_of_complete, fun h => h.aemeasurable⟩
theorem MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_map_iff {g : β → γ} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
AEMeasurable g (μ.map f) ↔ AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.comp_measurable hf.measurable, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨g₁, hgm₁, heq⟩
rcases hf.exists_measurable_extend hgm₁ fun x => ⟨g x⟩ with ⟨g₂, hgm₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g₂, hgm₂, hf.ae_map_iff.2 heq⟩
theorem MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
{μ : Measure α} : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, hg.measurable.comp_aemeasurable⟩
suffices AEMeasurable ((rangeSplitting g ∘ rangeFactorization g) ∘ f) μ by
rwa [(rightInverse_rangeSplitting hg.injective).comp_eq_id] at this
exact hg.measurable_rangeSplitting.comp_aemeasurable H.subtype_mk
theorem aemeasurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ↔ AEMeasurable (f ∘ (↑) : s → β) (comap (↑) μ) := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).aemeasurable_map_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem aemeasurable_one [One β] : AEMeasurable (fun _ : α => (1 : β)) μ :=
measurable_one.aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem aemeasurable_smul_measure_iff {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
AEMeasurable f (c • μ) ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 h.ae_eq_mk⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 h.ae_eq_mk⟩⟩
theorem aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_trim {α} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, Measurable.mono hf.measurable_mk hm le_rfl, ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem aemeasurable_restrict_of_measurable_subtype {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable fun x : s => f x) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(aemeasurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype hs).2 hf.aemeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_map_equiv_iff (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → γ} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.map e) ↔ AEMeasurable (f ∘ e) μ :=
e.measurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_map_iff
end
theorem AEMeasurable.restrict (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) {s} : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨AEMeasurable.mk f hfm, hfm.measurable_mk, ae_restrict_of_ae hfm.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem aemeasurable_Ioi_of_forall_Ioc {β} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [LinearOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] {x : α} {g : α → β}
(g_meas : ∀ t > x, AEMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ioc x t))) :
AEMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ioi x)) := by
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨x⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu_tendsto⟩ := exists_seq_tendsto (atTop : Filter α)
have Ioi_eq_iUnion : Ioi x = ⋃ n : ℕ, Ioc x (u n) := by
rw [iUnion_Ioc_eq_Ioi_self_iff.mpr _]
exact fun y _ => (hu_tendsto.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop y)).exists
rw [Ioi_eq_iUnion, aemeasurable_iUnion_iff]
intro n
rcases lt_or_le x (u n) with h | h
· exact g_meas (u n) h
· rw [Ioc_eq_empty (not_lt.mpr h), Measure.restrict_empty]
exact aemeasurable_zero_measure
section Zero
variable [Zero β]
theorem aemeasurable_indicator_iff {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
AEMeasurable (indicator s f) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact (h.mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self).congr (indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs)
· intro h
refine ⟨indicator s (h.mk f), h.measurable_mk.indicator hs, ?_⟩
have A : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] s.indicator (AEMeasurable.mk f h) :=
(indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs).trans (h.ae_eq_mk.trans <| (indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs).symm)
have B : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] s.indicator (AEMeasurable.mk f h) :=
(indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs).trans (indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs).symm
exact ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ A B
theorem aemeasurable_indicator_iff₀ {s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
AEMeasurable (indicator s f) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hs with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
rw [← aemeasurable_congr (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hst.symm), aemeasurable_indicator_iff ht,
restrict_congr_set hst]
/-- A characterization of the a.e.-measurability of the indicator function which takes a constant
value `b` on a set `A` and `0` elsewhere. -/
lemma aemeasurable_indicator_const_iff {s} [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
AEMeasurable (s.indicator (fun _ ↦ b)) μ ↔ NullMeasurableSet s μ := by
classical
constructor <;> intro h
· convert h.nullMeasurable (MeasurableSet.singleton (0 : β)).compl
rw [indicator_const_preimage_eq_union s {0}ᶜ b]
simp [NeZero.ne b]
· exact (aemeasurable_indicator_iff₀ h).mpr aemeasurable_const
@[measurability]
theorem AEMeasurable.indicator (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
AEMeasurable (s.indicator f) μ :=
(aemeasurable_indicator_iff hs).mpr hfm.restrict
theorem AEMeasurable.indicator₀ (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) {s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
| AEMeasurable (s.indicator f) μ :=
(aemeasurable_indicator_iff₀ hs).mpr hfm.restrict
end Zero
theorem MeasureTheory.Measure.restrict_map_of_aemeasurable {f : α → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set δ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
calc
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.map (hf.mk f)).restrict s := by
congr 1
apply Measure.map_congr hf.ae_eq_mk
_ = (μ.restrict <| hf.mk f ⁻¹' s).map (hf.mk f) := Measure.restrict_map hf.measurable_mk hs
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AEMeasurable.lean | 338 | 349 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.GammaSpecAdjunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Radical
/-!
# Proj as a scheme
This file is to prove that `Proj` is a scheme.
## Notation
* `Proj` : `Proj` as a locally ringed space
* `Proj.T` : the underlying topological space of `Proj`
* `Proj| U` : `Proj` restricted to some open set `U`
* `Proj.T| U` : the underlying topological space of `Proj` restricted to open set `U`
* `pbo f` : basic open set at `f` in `Proj`
* `Spec` : `Spec` as a locally ringed space
* `Spec.T` : the underlying topological space of `Spec`
* `sbo g` : basic open set at `g` in `Spec`
* `A⁰_x` : the degree zero part of localized ring `Aₓ`
## Implementation
In `AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/StructureSheaf.lean`, we have given `Proj` a
structure sheaf so that `Proj` is a locally ringed space. In this file we will prove that `Proj`
equipped with this structure sheaf is a scheme. We achieve this by using an affine cover by basic
open sets in `Proj`, more specifically:
1. We prove that `Proj` can be covered by basic open sets at homogeneous element of positive degree.
2. We prove that for any homogeneous element `f : A` of positive degree `m`, `Proj.T | (pbo f)` is
homeomorphic to `Spec.T A⁰_f`:
- forward direction `toSpec`:
for any `x : pbo f`, i.e. a relevant homogeneous prime ideal `x`, send it to
`A⁰_f ∩ span {g / 1 | g ∈ x}` (see `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.IoSpec.carrier`). This ideal is
prime, the proof is in `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.ToSpec.toFun`. The fact that this function
is continuous is found in `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec`
- backward direction `fromSpec`:
for any `q : Spec A⁰_f`, we send it to `{a | ∀ i, aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}`; we need this to be a
homogeneous prime ideal that is relevant.
* This is in fact an ideal, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal`;
* This ideal is also homogeneous, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal.homogeneous`;
* This ideal is relevant, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.relevant`;
* This ideal is prime, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal.prime`.
Hence we have a well defined function `Spec.T A⁰_f → Proj.T | (pbo f)`, this function is called
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.toFun`. But to prove the continuity of this function, we need
to prove `fromSpec ∘ toSpec` and `toSpec ∘ fromSpec` are both identities; these are achieved in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.fromSpec_toSpec` and `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec_fromSpec`.
3. Then we construct a morphism of locally ringed spaces `α : Proj| (pbo f) ⟶ Spec.T A⁰_f` as the
following: by the Gamma-Spec adjunction, it is sufficient to construct a ring map
`A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` from the ring of homogeneous localization of `A` away from `f` to the
local sections of structure sheaf of projective spectrum on the basic open set around `f`.
The map `A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` is constructed in `awayToΓ` and is defined by sending
`s ∈ A⁰_f` to the section `x ↦ s` on `pbo f`.
## Main Definitions and Statements
For a homogeneous element `f` of degree `m`
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec`: the continuous map between `Proj.T| pbo f` and `Spec.T A⁰_f`
defined by sending `x : Proj| (pbo f)` to `A⁰_f ∩ span {g / 1 | g ∈ x}`. We also denote this map
as `ψ`.
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.ToSpec.preimage_eq`: for any `a: A`, if `a/f^m` has degree zero,
then the preimage of `sbo a/f^m` under `toSpec f` is `pbo f ∩ pbo a`.
If we further assume `m` is positive
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.fromSpec`: the continuous map between `Spec.T A⁰_f` and `Proj.T| pbo f`
defined by sending `q` to `{a | aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}` where `aᵢ` is the `i`-th coordinate of `a`.
We also denote this map as `φ`
* `projIsoSpecTopComponent`: the homeomorphism `Proj.T| pbo f ≅ Spec.T A⁰_f` obtained by `φ` and
`ψ`.
* `ProjectiveSpectrum.Proj.toSpec`: the morphism of locally ringed spaces between `Proj| pbo f`
and `Spec A⁰_f` corresponding to the ring map `A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` under the Gamma-Spec
adjunction defined by sending `s` to the section `x ↦ s` on `pbo f`.
Finally,
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Proj`: for any `ℕ`-graded ring `A`, `Proj A` is locally affine, hence is a
scheme.
## Reference
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]: Chapter II.2 Proposition 2.5
-/
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open scoped DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike.GradedMonoid Localization
open Finset hiding mk_zero
variable {R A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
open TopCat TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory Opposite
open ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
-- Porting note: currently require lack of hygiene to use in variable declarations
-- maybe all make into notation3?
set_option hygiene false
/-- `Proj` as a locally ringed space -/
local notation3 "Proj" => Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜
/-- The underlying topological space of `Proj` -/
local notation3 "Proj.T" => PresheafedSpace.carrier <| SheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace
<| LocallyRingedSpace.toSheafedSpace <| Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜
/-- `Proj` restrict to some open set -/
macro "Proj| " U:term : term =>
`((Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜).restrict
(Opens.isOpenEmbedding (X := Proj.T) ($U : Opens Proj.T)))
/-- the underlying topological space of `Proj` restricted to some open set -/
local notation "Proj.T| " U => PresheafedSpace.carrier <| SheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace
<| LocallyRingedSpace.toSheafedSpace
<| (LocallyRingedSpace.restrict Proj (Opens.isOpenEmbedding (X := Proj.T) (U : Opens Proj.T)))
/-- basic open sets in `Proj` -/
local notation "pbo " x => ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 x
/-- basic open sets in `Spec` -/
local notation "sbo " f => PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f
/-- `Spec` as a locally ringed space -/
local notation3 "Spec " ring => Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (CommRingCat.of ring)
/-- the underlying topological space of `Spec` -/
local notation "Spec.T " ring =>
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (CommRingCat.of ring)).toSheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace.1
local notation3 "A⁰_ " f => HomogeneousLocalization.Away 𝒜 f
namespace ProjIsoSpecTopComponent
/-
This section is to construct the homeomorphism between `Proj` restricted at basic open set at
a homogeneous element `x` and `Spec A⁰ₓ` where `A⁰ₓ` is the degree zero part of the localized
ring `Aₓ`.
-/
namespace ToSpec
open Ideal
-- This section is to construct the forward direction :
-- So for any `x` in `Proj| (pbo f)`, we need some point in `Spec A⁰_f`, i.e. a prime ideal,
-- and we need this correspondence to be continuous in their Zariski topology.
variable {𝒜}
variable {f : A} {m : ℕ} (x : Proj| (pbo f))
/--
For any `x` in `Proj| (pbo f)`, the corresponding ideal in `Spec A⁰_f`. This fact that this ideal
is prime is proven in `TopComponent.Forward.toFun`. -/
def carrier : Ideal (A⁰_ f) :=
Ideal.comap (algebraMap (A⁰_ f) (Away f))
(x.val.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.map (algebraMap A (Away f)))
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_carrier (z : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 (.powers f)) :
HomogeneousLocalization.mk z ∈ carrier x ↔ z.num.1 ∈ x.1.asHomogeneousIdeal := by
rw [carrier, Ideal.mem_comap, HomogeneousLocalization.algebraMap_apply,
HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one,
mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem, ← Ideal.mem_comap,
IsLocalization.comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint (.powers f)]
· rfl
· infer_instance
· exact (disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem _ (Ideal.IsPrime.isRadical inferInstance)).mpr x.2
· exact isUnit_of_invertible _
theorem isPrime_carrier : Ideal.IsPrime (carrier x) := by
refine Ideal.IsPrime.comap _ (hK := ?_)
exact IsLocalization.isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint
(Submonoid.powers f) _ _ inferInstance
((disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem _ (Ideal.IsPrime.isRadical inferInstance)).mpr x.2)
variable (f)
/-- The function between the basic open set `D(f)` in `Proj` to the corresponding basic open set in
`Spec A⁰_f`. This is bundled into a continuous map in `TopComponent.forward`.
-/
@[simps -isSimp]
def toFun (x : Proj.T| pbo f) : Spec.T A⁰_ f :=
⟨carrier x, isPrime_carrier x⟩
/-
The preimage of basic open set `D(a/f^n)` in `Spec A⁰_f` under the forward map from `Proj A` to
`Spec A⁰_f` is the basic open set `D(a) ∩ D(f)` in `Proj A`. This lemma is used to prove that the
forward map is continuous.
-/
theorem preimage_basicOpen (z : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 (.powers f)) :
toFun f ⁻¹' (sbo (HomogeneousLocalization.mk z) : Set (PrimeSpectrum (A⁰_ f))) =
Subtype.val ⁻¹' (pbo z.num.1 : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :=
Set.ext fun y ↦ (mk_mem_carrier y z).not
end ToSpec
section
/-- The continuous function from the basic open set `D(f)` in `Proj`
to the corresponding basic open set in `Spec A⁰_f`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp hom_apply_asIdeal]
def toSpec (f : A) : (Proj.T| pbo f) ⟶ Spec.T A⁰_ f :=
TopCat.ofHom
{ toFun := ToSpec.toFun f
continuous_toFun := by
rw [PrimeSpectrum.isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.continuous_iff]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk''_surjective x
rw [ToSpec.preimage_basicOpen]
exact (pbo x.num).2.preimage continuous_subtype_val }
variable {𝒜} in
lemma toSpec_preimage_basicOpen {f} (z : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 (.powers f)) :
toSpec 𝒜 f ⁻¹' (sbo (HomogeneousLocalization.mk z) : Set (PrimeSpectrum (A⁰_ f))) =
Subtype.val ⁻¹' (pbo z.num.1 : Set (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)) :=
ToSpec.preimage_basicOpen f z
end
namespace FromSpec
open GradedAlgebra SetLike
open Finset hiding mk_zero
open HomogeneousLocalization
variable {𝒜}
variable {f : A} {m : ℕ} (f_deg : f ∈ 𝒜 m)
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
macro "mem_tac_aux" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | exact pow_mem_graded _ (Submodule.coe_mem _) | exact natCast_mem_graded _ _ |
exact pow_mem_graded _ f_deg)
macro "mem_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | mem_tac_aux |
repeat (all_goals (apply SetLike.GradedMonoid.toGradedMul.mul_mem)); mem_tac_aux)
/-- The function from `Spec A⁰_f` to `Proj|D(f)` is defined by `q ↦ {a | aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}`, i.e. sending
`q` a prime ideal in `A⁰_f` to the homogeneous prime relevant ideal containing only and all the
elements `a : A` such that for every `i`, the degree 0 element formed by dividing the `m`-th power
of the `i`-th projection of `a` by the `i`-th power of the degree-`m` homogeneous element `f`,
lies in `q`.
The set `{a | aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}`
* is an ideal, as proved in `carrier.asIdeal`;
* is homogeneous, as proved in `carrier.asHomogeneousIdeal`;
* is prime, as proved in `carrier.asIdeal.prime`;
* is relevant, as proved in `carrier.relevant`.
-/
def carrier (f_deg : f ∈ 𝒜 m) (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) : Set A :=
{a | ∀ i, (HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨m * i, ⟨proj 𝒜 i a ^ m, by rw [← smul_eq_mul]; mem_tac⟩,
⟨f ^ i, by rw [mul_comm]; mem_tac⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.1}
theorem mem_carrier_iff (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) (a : A) :
a ∈ carrier f_deg q ↔ ∀ i, (HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨m * i, ⟨proj 𝒜 i a ^ m, by
rw [← smul_eq_mul]; mem_tac⟩,
⟨f ^ i, by rw [mul_comm]; mem_tac⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_carrier_iff' (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) (a : A) :
a ∈ carrier f_deg q ↔
∀ i, (Localization.mk (proj 𝒜 i a ^ m) ⟨f ^ i, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ : Localization.Away f) ∈
algebraMap (HomogeneousLocalization.Away 𝒜 f) (Localization.Away f) '' { s | s ∈ q.1 } :=
(mem_carrier_iff f_deg q a).trans
(by
constructor <;> intro h i <;> specialize h i
· rw [Set.mem_image]; refine ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
· rw [Set.mem_image] at h; rcases h with ⟨x, h, hx⟩
change x ∈ q.asIdeal at h
convert h
rw [HomogeneousLocalization.ext_iff_val, HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk]
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk]; rw [← hx]; rfl)
theorem mem_carrier_iff_of_mem (hm : 0 < m) (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) (a : A) {n} (hn : a ∈ 𝒜 n) :
a ∈ carrier f_deg q ↔
(HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨m * n, ⟨a ^ m, pow_mem_graded m hn⟩,
⟨f ^ n, by rw [mul_comm]; mem_tac⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.asIdeal := by
trans (HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨m * n, ⟨proj 𝒜 n a ^ m, by rw [← smul_eq_mul]; mem_tac⟩,
⟨f ^ n, by rw [mul_comm]; mem_tac⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.asIdeal
· refine ⟨fun h ↦ h n, fun h i ↦ if hi : i = n then hi ▸ h else ?_⟩
convert zero_mem q.asIdeal
apply HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective
simp only [proj_apply, decompose_of_mem_ne _ hn (Ne.symm hi), zero_pow hm.ne',
HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, Localization.mk_zero, HomogeneousLocalization.val_zero]
· simp only [proj_apply, decompose_of_mem_same _ hn]
theorem mem_carrier_iff_of_mem_mul (hm : 0 < m)
(q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) (a : A) {n} (hn : a ∈ 𝒜 (n * m)) :
a ∈ carrier f_deg q ↔ (HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨m * n, ⟨a, mul_comm n m ▸ hn⟩,
⟨f ^ n, by rw [mul_comm]; mem_tac⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.asIdeal := by
rw [mem_carrier_iff_of_mem f_deg hm q a hn, iff_iff_eq, eq_comm,
← Ideal.IsPrime.pow_mem_iff_mem (α := A⁰_ f) inferInstance m hm]
congr 1
apply HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective
simp only [HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, HomogeneousLocalization.val_pow,
Localization.mk_pow, pow_mul]
rfl
theorem num_mem_carrier_iff (hm : 0 < m) (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f)
(z : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 (.powers f)) :
z.num.1 ∈ carrier f_deg q ↔ HomogeneousLocalization.mk z ∈ q.asIdeal := by
obtain ⟨n, hn : f ^ n = _⟩ := z.den_mem
have : f ^ n ≠ 0 := fun e ↦ by
have := HomogeneousLocalization.subsingleton 𝒜 (x := .powers f) ⟨n, e⟩
exact IsEmpty.elim (inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty (PrimeSpectrum (A⁰_ f)))) q
convert mem_carrier_iff_of_mem_mul f_deg hm q z.num.1 (n := n) ?_ using 2
· apply HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective; simp only [hn, HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk]
| · have := degree_eq_of_mem_mem 𝒜 (SetLike.pow_mem_graded n f_deg) (hn.symm ▸ z.den.2) this
rw [← smul_eq_mul, this]; exact z.num.2
theorem carrier.add_mem (q : Spec.T A⁰_ f) {a b : A} (ha : a ∈ carrier f_deg q)
(hb : b ∈ carrier f_deg q) : a + b ∈ carrier f_deg q := by
refine fun i => (q.2.mem_or_mem ?_).elim id id
change (HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ : A⁰_ f) ∈ q.1; dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk]
simp_rw [← pow_add, map_add, add_pow, mul_comm, ← nsmul_eq_mul]
let g : ℕ → A⁰_ f := fun j => (m + m).choose j •
if h2 : m + m < j then (0 : A⁰_ f)
else
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/Scheme.lean | 325 | 335 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma pow_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, a ^ n = 0 → a = 0
| 0, ha => by simpa using congr_arg (a * ·) ha
| n + 1, ha => by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_zero] at ha; exact ha.elim pow_eq_zero id
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨pow_eq_zero, by rintro rfl; exact zero_pow hn⟩
lemma pow_ne_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (pow_eq_zero_iff hn).not
@[field_simps]
lemma pow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h
instance NeZero.pow [NeZero a] : NeZero (a ^ n) := ⟨pow_ne_zero n NeZero.out⟩
lemma sq_eq_zero_iff : a ^ 2 = 0 ↔ a = 0 := pow_eq_zero_iff two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff' [Nontrivial M₀] : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_right_inv_of_exists_left_inv {α} [MonoidWithZero α]
(h : ∀ a : α, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : α, b * a = 1) {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ b : α, a * b = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ := subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· exact ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h b (left_ne_zero_of_mul <| hb.trans_ne one_ne_zero)
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← one_mul (a * b), ← hc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc b, hb, one_mul, hc]
end MonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) CancelMonoidWithZero.to_noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors M₀ :=
⟨fun ab0 => or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ha => mul_left_cancel₀ ha <|
ab0.trans (mul_zero _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_right_iff : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b ∨ c = 0 := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> [simp only [hc, mul_zero, or_true]; simp [mul_left_inj', hc]]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_left_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c ∨ a = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> [simp only [ha, zero_mul, or_true]; simp [mul_right_inj', ha]]
theorem mul_right_eq_self₀ : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 :=
calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 := mul_eq_mul_left_iff
theorem mul_left_eq_self₀ : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 :=
calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 := mul_eq_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_right_inj' ha, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_left_inj' hb, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_left₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_right₀ hb]
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by right multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : a * b = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_left_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (mul_one a).symm
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by left multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : b * a = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_right_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (one_mul a).symm
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b x : G₀}
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_right_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => x * y := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul] using congr_arg (fun y => x⁻¹ * y) w
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_left_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => y * x := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one] using congr_arg (fun y => y * x⁻¹) w
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
calc
a * b⁻¹ * b = a * (b⁻¹ * b) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
calc
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = a⁻¹ * a * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
_ = b := by simp [h]
private theorem inv_eq_of_mul (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h) b, h, mul_one]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toDivisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid G₀ :=
{ ‹GroupWithZero G₀› with
inv := Inv.inv,
inv_inv := fun a => by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp [h]
· exact left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_cancel₀ <| inv_ne_zero h) (inv_mul_cancel₀ h)
,
mul_inv_rev := fun a b => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· simp [hb]
apply inv_eq_of_mul
simp [mul_assoc, ha, hb],
inv_eq_of_mul := fun _ _ => inv_eq_of_mul }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero : CancelMonoidWithZero G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hx h => by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx y, h, inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx z],
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hy h => by
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy x, h, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy z] }
end GroupWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : G₀) : 0 / a = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : G₀) : a / 0 = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_zero, mul_zero]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then by its inverse results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_mul_inv (a : G₀) : a * a * a⁻¹ = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one]
/-- Multiplying `a` by its inverse and then by itself results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_mul_cancel (a : G₀) : a * a⁻¹ * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a⁻¹` by `a` twice results in `a` (whether or not `a`
is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_mul_self (a : G₀) : a⁻¹ * a * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then dividing by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_div_self (a : G₀) : a * a / a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv a]
/-- Dividing `a` by itself and then multiplying by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self (a : G₀) : a / a * a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_mul_cancel a]
attribute [local simp] div_eq_mul_inv mul_comm mul_assoc mul_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self' (a : G₀) : a / (a * a) = a⁻¹ :=
calc
a / (a * a) = a⁻¹⁻¹ * a⁻¹ * a⁻¹ := by simp [mul_inv_rev]
_ = a⁻¹ := inv_mul_mul_self _
theorem one_div_ne_zero {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : 1 / a ≠ 0 := by
| simpa only [one_div] using inv_ne_zero h
@[simp]
theorem inv_eq_zero {a : G₀} : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_zero]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 367 | 370 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
|
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 134 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
-- TODO: remove Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced and move the last two lemmas to Lemmas
/-!
# Roots of unity
We define roots of unity in the context of an arbitrary commutative monoid,
as a subgroup of the group of units.
## Main definitions
* `rootsOfUnity n M`, for `n : ℕ` is the subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid `M`
consisting of elements `x` that satisfy `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main results
* `rootsOfUnity.isCyclic`: the roots of unity in an integral domain form a cyclic group.
## Implementation details
It is desirable that `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup,
and it will mainly be applied to rings (e.g. the ring of integers in a number field) and fields.
We therefore implement it as a subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid.
We have chosen to define `rootsOfUnity n` for `n : ℕ` and add a `[NeZero n]` typeclass
assumption when we need `n` to be non-zero (which is the case for most interesting statements).
Note that `rootsOfUnity 0 M` is the top subgroup of `Mˣ` (as the condition `ζ^0 = 1` is
satisfied for all units).
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
variable {M N G R S F : Type*}
variable [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] [DivisionCommMonoid G]
section rootsOfUnity
variable {k l : ℕ}
/-- `rootsOfUnity k M` is the subgroup of elements `m : Mˣ` that satisfy `m ^ k = 1`. -/
def rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : Subgroup Mˣ where
carrier := {ζ | ζ ^ k = 1}
one_mem' := one_pow _
mul_mem' _ _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, mul_pow, one_mul]
inv_mem' _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, inv_pow, inv_one]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ ζ ^ k = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity` using `ζ : Mˣ`. -/
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity' (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ (ζ : M) ^ k = 1 := by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity]; norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity_one (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 1 M = ⊥ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_one, Subgroup.mem_bot]
@[simp]
lemma rootsOfUnity_zero (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 0 M = ⊤ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_zero, Subgroup.mem_top]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_injective {n : ℕ} :
Function.Injective (fun x : rootsOfUnity n M ↦ x.val.val) :=
Units.ext.comp fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.eq
/-- Make an element of `rootsOfUnity` from a member of the base ring, and a proof that it has
a positive power equal to one. -/
@[simps! coe_val]
def rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq (ζ : M) {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) : rootsOfUnity n M :=
⟨Units.ofPowEqOne ζ n h <| NeZero.ne n, Units.pow_ofPowEqOne _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_mkOfPowEq {ζ : M} {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) :
((rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq _ h : Mˣ) : M) = ζ :=
rfl
theorem rootsOfUnity_le_of_dvd (h : k ∣ l) : rootsOfUnity k M ≤ rootsOfUnity l M := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h
intro ζ h
simp_all only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_mul, one_pow]
theorem map_rootsOfUnity (f : Mˣ →* Nˣ) (k : ℕ) : (rootsOfUnity k M).map f ≤ rootsOfUnity k N := by
rintro _ ⟨ζ, h, rfl⟩
simp_all only [← map_pow, mem_rootsOfUnity, SetLike.mem_coe, MonoidHom.map_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_pow [CommMonoid R] (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) (m : ℕ) :
(((ζ ^ m :) : Rˣ) : R) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
rw [Subgroup.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
/-- The canonical isomorphism from the `n`th roots of unity in `Mˣ`
to the `n`th roots of unity in `M`. -/
def rootsOfUnityUnitsMulEquiv (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n Mˣ ≃* rootsOfUnity n M where
toFun ζ := ⟨ζ.val, (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mpr <| (mem_rootsOfUnity' ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
invFun ζ := ⟨toUnits ζ.val, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, EmbeddingLike.map_eq_one_iff]
exact (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
left_inv ζ := by simp only [toUnits_val_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv ζ := by simp only [val_toUnits_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
map_mul' ζ ζ' := by simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk]
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid R] [CommMonoid S] [FunLike F R S]
/-- Restrict a ring homomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
def restrictRootsOfUnity [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R →* rootsOfUnity n S :=
{ toFun := fun ξ ↦ ⟨Units.map σ (ξ : Rˣ), by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, Units.ext_iff, Units.coe_map, ξ.prop]
exact map_one σ⟩
map_one' := by ext1; simp only [OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one]
map_mul' := fun ξ₁ ξ₂ ↦ by
ext1; simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, map_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk] }
@[simp]
theorem restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(restrictRootsOfUnity σ k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
/-- Restrict a monoid isomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
nonrec def MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity (σ : R ≃* S) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R ≃* rootsOfUnity n S where
toFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ n
invFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ.symm n
left_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.apply_symm_apply _
map_mul' := (restrictRootsOfUnity _ n).map_mul
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply (σ : R ≃* S) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_symm (σ : R ≃* S) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k).symm = σ.symm.restrictRootsOfUnity k :=
rfl
end CommMonoid
section IsDomain
-- The following results need `k` to be nonzero.
variable [NeZero k] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k R ↔ (ζ : R) ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_nthRoots (NeZero.pos k), Units.ext_iff, Units.val_one,
Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
variable (k R)
/-- Equivalence between the `k`-th roots of unity in `R` and the `k`-th roots of `1`.
This is implemented as equivalence of subtypes,
because `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup of the group of units,
whereas `nthRoots` is a multiset. -/
def rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots : rootsOfUnity k R ≃ { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } where
toFun x := ⟨(x : Rˣ), mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots.mp x.2⟩
invFun x := by
refine ⟨⟨x, ↑x ^ (k - 1 : ℕ), ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
all_goals
rcases x with ⟨x, hx⟩; rw [mem_nthRoots <| NeZero.pos k] at hx
simp only [← pow_succ, ← pow_succ', hx, tsub_add_cancel_of_le NeZero.one_le]
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, hx, Units.val_one]
left_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
right_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
variable {k R}
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_apply (x : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k x : R) = ((x : Rˣ) : R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_symm_apply (x : { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) }) :
(((rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm x : Rˣ) : R) = (x : R) :=
rfl
variable (k R)
instance rootsOfUnity.fintype : Fintype (rootsOfUnity k R) := by
classical
exact Fintype.ofEquiv { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm
instance rootsOfUnity.isCyclic : IsCyclic (rootsOfUnity k R) :=
isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain ((Units.coeHom R).comp (rootsOfUnity k R).subtype) coe_injective
theorem card_rootsOfUnity : Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) ≤ k := by
classical
calc
Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) = Fintype.card { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } :=
Fintype.card_congr (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k)
_ ≤ Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)).attach := Multiset.card_le_card (Multiset.dedup_le _)
_ = Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)) := Multiset.card_attach
_ ≤ k := card_nthRoots k 1
variable {k R}
theorem map_rootsOfUnity_eq_pow_self [FunLike F R R] [MonoidHomClass F R R] (σ : F)
(ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
∃ m : ℕ, σ (ζ : Rˣ) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := MonoidHom.map_cyclic (restrictRootsOfUnity σ k)
rw [← restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply, hm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.toNat_of_nonneg
(m.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp (orderOf_pos ζ)))),
zpow_natCast, rootsOfUnity.coe_pow]
exact ⟨(m % orderOf ζ).toNat, rfl⟩
end IsDomain
section Reduced
variable (R) [CommRing R] [IsReduced R]
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff'`
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity (p ^ k * m) R ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity', ExpChar.pow_prime_pow_mul_eq_one_iff]
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff` in terms of `ζ ^ _` -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff' (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ^ (p ^ k * m) = 1 ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
rw [← mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff]
end Reduced
end rootsOfUnity
section cyclic
namespace IsCyclic
/-- The isomorphism from the group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order
`n` into another group `G'` to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'` determined by a generator
`g` of `G`. It sends `φ : G →* G'` to `φ g`. -/
noncomputable
def monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] {g : G}
(hg : ∀ (x : G), x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers g) (G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
(G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' where
toFun φ := ⟨(IsUnit.map φ <| Group.isUnit g).unit, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, IsUnit.unit_spec,
← map_pow, pow_card_eq_one', map_one, Units.val_one]⟩
invFun ζ := monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers hg (g' := (ζ.val : G')) <| by
simpa only [orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one,
← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_eq_one] using ζ.prop
left_inv φ := (MonoidHom.eq_iff_eq_on_generator hg _ φ).mpr <| by
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec, monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen]
right_inv φ := Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
map_mul' x y := by
simp only [MonoidHom.mul_apply, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq, Units.ext_iff,
IsUnit.unit_spec, Units.val_mul]
/-- The group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order `n` into another
group `G'` is (noncanonically) isomorphic to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'`. -/
lemma monoidHom_mulEquiv_rootsOfUnity (G : Type*) [CommGroup G] [IsCyclic G]
(G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
Nonempty <| (G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
exact ⟨monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator hg G'⟩
end IsCyclic
end cyclic
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Basic.lean | 1,018 | 1,022 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.LinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Finite and free modules using matrices
We provide some instances for finite and free modules involving matrices.
## Main results
* `Module.Free.linearMap` : if `M` and `N` are finite and free, then `M →ₗ[R] N` is free.
* `Module.Finite.ofBasis` : A free module with a basis indexed by a `Fintype` is finite.
* `Module.Finite.linearMap` : if `M` and `N` are finite and free, then `M →ₗ[R] N`
is finite.
-/
universe u u' v w
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type u') (M : Type v) (N : Type w)
open Module.Free (chooseBasis ChooseBasisIndex)
open Module (finrank)
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
private noncomputable def linearMapEquivFun : (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[S] ChooseBasisIndex R M → N :=
(chooseBasis R M).repr.congrLeft N S ≪≫ₗ (Finsupp.lsum S).symm ≪≫ₗ
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun _ ↦ LinearMap.ringLmapEquivSelf R S N
instance Module.Free.linearMap [Module.Free S N] : Module.Free S (M →ₗ[R] N) :=
Module.Free.of_equiv (linearMapEquivFun R S M N).symm
instance Module.Finite.linearMap [Module.Finite S N] : Module.Finite S (M →ₗ[R] N) :=
Module.Finite.equiv (linearMapEquivFun R S M N).symm
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [StrongRankCondition S] [Module.Free S N]
open Cardinal
theorem Module.rank_linearMap :
Module.rank S (M →ₗ[R] N) = lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) * lift.{v} (Module.rank S N) := by
rw [(linearMapEquivFun R S M N).rank_eq, rank_fun_eq_lift_mul,
← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, ← finrank_eq_rank R, lift_natCast]
/-- The finrank of `M →ₗ[R] N` as an `S`-module is `(finrank R M) * (finrank S N)`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_linearMap :
finrank S (M →ₗ[R] N) = finrank R M * finrank S N := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_linearMap, toNat_mul, toNat_lift]
variable [Module R S] [SMulCommClass R S S]
theorem Module.rank_linearMap_self :
Module.rank S (M →ₗ[R] S) = lift.{u'} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_linearMap, rank_self, lift_one, mul_one]
theorem Module.finrank_linearMap_self : finrank S (M →ₗ[R] S) = finrank R M := by
rw [finrank_linearMap, finrank_self, mul_one]
end Ring
section AlgHom
variable (K M : Type*) (L : Type v) [CommRing K] [Ring M] [Algebra K M]
[Module.Free K M] [Module.Finite K M] [CommRing L] [IsDomain L] [Algebra K L]
instance Finite.algHom : Finite (M →ₐ[K] L) :=
(linearIndependent_algHom_toLinearMap K M L).finite
open Cardinal
theorem cardinalMk_algHom_le_rank : #(M →ₐ[K] L) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank K M) := by
convert (linearIndependent_algHom_toLinearMap K M L).cardinal_lift_le_rank
· rw [lift_id]
· have := Module.nontrivial K L
| rw [lift_id, Module.rank_linearMap_self]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")] alias cardinal_mk_algHom_le_rank := cardinalMk_algHom_le_rank
@[stacks 09HS]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FreeModule/Finite/Matrix.lean | 85 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
| refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 114 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
|
/-!
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 329 | 330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projection
/-!
# Bases in a vector space
This file provides results for bases of a vector space.
Some of these results should be merged with the results on free modules.
We state these results in a separate file to the results on modules to avoid an
import cycle.
## Main statements
* `Basis.ofVectorSpace` states that every vector space has a basis.
* `Module.Free.of_divisionRing` states that every vector space is a free module.
## Tags
basis, bases
-/
open Function Set Submodule
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {K : Type*} {V : Type*} {V' : Type*}
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module K V] [Module K V']
variable {v : ι → V} {s t : Set V} {x y z : V}
open Submodule
namespace Basis
section ExistsBasis
/-- If `s` is a linear independent set of vectors, we can extend it to a basis. -/
noncomputable def extend (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) :
Basis (hs.extend (subset_univ s)) K V :=
Basis.mk
(hs.linearIndepOn_extend _).linearIndependent_restrict
(SetLike.coe_subset_coe.mp <| by simpa using hs.subset_span_extend (subset_univ s))
theorem extend_apply_self (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (x : hs.extend _) : Basis.extend hs x = x :=
Basis.mk_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coe_extend (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) : ⇑(Basis.extend hs) = ((↑) : _ → _) :=
funext (extend_apply_self hs)
theorem range_extend (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) :
range (Basis.extend hs) = hs.extend (subset_univ _) := by
rw [coe_extend, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
/-- Auxiliary definition: the index for the new basis vectors in `Basis.sumExtend`.
The specific value of this definition should be considered an implementation detail. -/
def sumExtendIndex (hs : LinearIndependent K v) : Set V :=
LinearIndepOn.extend hs.linearIndepOn_id (subset_univ _) \ range v
/-- If `v` is a linear independent family of vectors, extend it to a basis indexed by a sum type. -/
noncomputable def sumExtend (hs : LinearIndependent K v) : Basis (ι ⊕ sumExtendIndex hs) K V :=
let s := Set.range v
let e : ι ≃ s := Equiv.ofInjective v hs.injective
let b := hs.linearIndepOn_id.extend (subset_univ (Set.range v))
(Basis.extend hs.linearIndepOn_id).reindex <|
Equiv.symm <|
calc
ι ⊕ (b \ s : Set V) ≃ s ⊕ (b \ s : Set V) := Equiv.sumCongr e (Equiv.refl _)
_ ≃ b :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
Equiv.Set.sumDiffSubset (hs.linearIndepOn_id.subset_extend _)
theorem subset_extend {s : Set V} (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) : s ⊆ hs.extend (Set.subset_univ _) :=
hs.subset_extend _
/-- If `s` is a family of linearly independent vectors contained in a set `t` spanning `V`,
then one can get a basis of `V` containing `s` and contained in `t`. -/
noncomputable def extendLe (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t) :
Basis (hs.extend hst) K V :=
Basis.mk
((hs.linearIndepOn_extend _).linearIndependent ..)
(le_trans ht <| Submodule.span_le.2 <| by simpa using hs.subset_span_extend hst)
theorem extendLe_apply_self (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t)
(x : hs.extend hst) : Basis.extendLe hs hst ht x = x :=
Basis.mk_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coe_extendLe (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t) :
⇑(Basis.extendLe hs hst ht) = ((↑) : _ → _) :=
funext (extendLe_apply_self hs hst ht)
theorem range_extendLe (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t) :
range (Basis.extendLe hs hst ht) = hs.extend hst := by
rw [coe_extendLe, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem subset_extendLe (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t) :
s ⊆ range (Basis.extendLe hs hst ht) :=
(range_extendLe hs hst ht).symm ▸ hs.subset_extend hst
theorem extendLe_subset (hs : LinearIndepOn K id s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : ⊤ ≤ span K t) :
range (Basis.extendLe hs hst ht) ⊆ t :=
(range_extendLe hs hst ht).symm ▸ hs.extend_subset hst
/-- If a set `s` spans the space, this is a basis contained in `s`. -/
noncomputable def ofSpan (hs : ⊤ ≤ span K s) :
Basis ((linearIndepOn_empty K id).extend (empty_subset s)) K V :=
extendLe (linearIndependent_empty K V) (empty_subset s) hs
theorem ofSpan_apply_self (hs : ⊤ ≤ span K s)
(x : (linearIndepOn_empty K id).extend (empty_subset s)) :
Basis.ofSpan hs x = x :=
extendLe_apply_self (linearIndependent_empty K V) (empty_subset s) hs x
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofSpan (hs : ⊤ ≤ span K s) : ⇑(ofSpan hs) = ((↑) : _ → _) :=
funext (ofSpan_apply_self hs)
theorem range_ofSpan (hs : ⊤ ≤ span K s) :
range (ofSpan hs) = (linearIndepOn_empty K id).extend (empty_subset s) := by
rw [coe_ofSpan, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem ofSpan_subset (hs : ⊤ ≤ span K s) : range (ofSpan hs) ⊆ s :=
extendLe_subset (linearIndependent_empty K V) (empty_subset s) hs
section
variable (K V)
/-- A set used to index `Basis.ofVectorSpace`. -/
noncomputable def ofVectorSpaceIndex : Set V :=
(linearIndepOn_empty K id).extend (subset_univ _)
/-- Each vector space has a basis. -/
noncomputable def ofVectorSpace : Basis (ofVectorSpaceIndex K V) K V :=
Basis.extend (linearIndependent_empty K V)
@[stacks 09FN "Generalized from fields to division rings."]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.Module.Free.of_divisionRing : Module.Free K V :=
Module.Free.of_basis (ofVectorSpace K V)
theorem ofVectorSpace_apply_self (x : ofVectorSpaceIndex K V) : ofVectorSpace K V x = x := by
unfold ofVectorSpace
exact Basis.mk_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofVectorSpace : ⇑(ofVectorSpace K V) = ((↑) : _ → _ ) :=
funext fun x => ofVectorSpace_apply_self K V x
theorem ofVectorSpaceIndex.linearIndependent :
LinearIndependent K ((↑) : ofVectorSpaceIndex K V → V) := by
convert (ofVectorSpace K V).linearIndependent
ext x
rw [ofVectorSpace_apply_self]
theorem range_ofVectorSpace : range (ofVectorSpace K V) = ofVectorSpaceIndex K V :=
range_extend _
theorem exists_basis : ∃ s : Set V, Nonempty (Basis s K V) :=
⟨ofVectorSpaceIndex K V, ⟨ofVectorSpace K V⟩⟩
end
end ExistsBasis
end Basis
open Fintype
variable (K V)
theorem VectorSpace.card_fintype [Fintype K] [Fintype V] : ∃ n : ℕ, card V = card K ^ n := by
classical
exact ⟨card (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K V), Module.card_fintype (Basis.ofVectorSpace K V)⟩
section AtomsOfSubmoduleLattice
variable {K V}
/-- For a module over a division ring, the span of a nonzero element is an atom of the
lattice of submodules. -/
theorem nonzero_span_atom (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0) : IsAtom (span K {v} : Submodule K V) := by
constructor
· rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff]
exact ⟨v, ⟨mem_span_singleton_self v, hv⟩⟩
· intro T hT
by_contra h
apply hT.2
change span K {v} ≤ T
simp_rw [span_singleton_le_iff_mem, ← Ne.eq_def, Submodule.ne_bot_iff] at *
rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨hs, hz⟩⟩
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 (hT.1 hs) with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | h
· simp only [zero_smul, ne_eq, not_true] at hz
· rwa [T.smul_mem_iff h] at hs
|
/-- The atoms of the lattice of submodules of a module over a division ring are the
submodules equal to the span of a nonzero element of the module. -/
theorem atom_iff_nonzero_span (W : Submodule K V) :
IsAtom W ↔ ∃ v ≠ 0, W = span K {v} := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hbot, h⟩ := h
rcases (Submodule.ne_bot_iff W).1 hbot with ⟨v, ⟨hW, hv⟩⟩
refine ⟨v, ⟨hv, ?_⟩⟩
by_contra heq
specialize h (span K {v})
rw [span_singleton_eq_bot, lt_iff_le_and_ne] at h
exact hv (h ⟨(span_singleton_le_iff_mem v W).2 hW, Ne.symm heq⟩)
· rcases h with ⟨v, ⟨hv, rfl⟩⟩
exact nonzero_span_atom v hv
/-- The lattice of submodules of a module over a division ring is atomistic. -/
instance : IsAtomistic (Submodule K V) :=
CompleteLattice.isAtomistic_iff.2 fun W => by
refine ⟨_, submodule_eq_sSup_le_nonzero_spans W, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨w, ⟨_, ⟨hw, rfl⟩⟩⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basis/VectorSpace.lean | 206 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
/-!
# Square root of a real number
In this file we define
* `NNReal.sqrt` to be the square root of a nonnegative real number.
* `Real.sqrt` to be the square root of a real number, defined to be zero on negative numbers.
Then we prove some basic properties of these functions.
## Implementation notes
We define `NNReal.sqrt` as the noncomputable inverse to the function `x ↦ x * x`. We use general
theory of inverses of strictly monotone functions to prove that `NNReal.sqrt x` exists. As a side
effect, `NNReal.sqrt` is a bundled `OrderIso`, so for `NNReal` numbers we get continuity as well as
theorems like `NNReal.sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y * y` for free.
Then we define `Real.sqrt x` to be `NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)`.
## Tags
square root
-/
open Set Filter
open scoped Filter NNReal Topology
namespace NNReal
variable {x y : ℝ≥0}
/-- Square root of a nonnegative real number. -/
-- Porting note (kmill): `pp_nodot` has no effect here
-- unless RFC https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/6178 leads to dot notation pp for CoeFun
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def sqrt : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
OrderIso.symm <| powOrderIso 2 two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma sq_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x ^ 2 = x := sqrt.symm_apply_apply _
@[simp] lemma sqrt_sq (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x ^ 2) = x := sqrt.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp] lemma mul_self_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x * sqrt x = x := by rw [← sq, sq_sqrt]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_mul_self (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * x) = x := by rw [← sq, sqrt_sq]
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt : sqrt x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ≤ y := sqrt.le_iff_le
lemma sqrt_lt_sqrt : sqrt x < sqrt y ↔ x < y := sqrt.lt_iff_lt
lemma sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq : sqrt x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := sqrt.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
lemma sqrt_le_iff_le_sq : sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := sqrt.to_galoisConnection _ _
lemma le_sqrt_iff_sq_le : x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y := (sqrt.symm.to_galoisConnection _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_zero : sqrt x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_one : sqrt x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_zero : sqrt 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_one : sqrt 1 = 1 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_le_one : sqrt x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ sqrt x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
theorem sqrt_mul (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * y) = sqrt x * sqrt y := by
rw [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, sq_sqrt]
/-- `NNReal.sqrt` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
noncomputable def sqrtHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ≥0 :=
⟨⟨sqrt, sqrt_zero⟩, sqrt_one, sqrt_mul⟩
theorem sqrt_inv (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x⁻¹ = (sqrt x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ sqrtHom x
theorem sqrt_div (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x / y) = sqrt x / sqrt y :=
map_div₀ sqrtHom x y
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous sqrt := sqrt.continuous
@[simp] theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < sqrt x ↔ 0 < x := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
attribute [bound] sqrt_pos_of_pos
end NNReal
namespace Real
/-- The square root of a real number. This returns 0 for negative inputs.
This has notation `√x`. Note that `√x⁻¹` is parsed as `√(x⁻¹)`. -/
noncomputable def sqrt (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)
-- TODO: replace this with a typeclass
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:max "√" => Real.sqrt
variable {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sqrt {x : ℝ≥0} : (NNReal.sqrt x : ℝ) = √(x : ℝ) := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.toNNReal_coe]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous (√· : ℝ → ℝ) :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp <| NNReal.continuous_sqrt.comp continuous_real_toNNReal
theorem sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (h : x ≤ 0) : sqrt x = 0 := by simp [sqrt, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero.2 h]
@[simp] theorem sqrt_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ √x := NNReal.coe_nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x * √x = x := by
rw [Real.sqrt, ← NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.mul_self_sqrt, Real.coe_toNNReal _ h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_mul_self (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x * x) = x :=
(mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) h).1 (mul_self_sqrt (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem sqrt_eq_cases : √x = y ↔ y * y = x ∧ 0 ≤ y ∨ x < 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hle | hlt
· exact Or.inl ⟨mul_self_sqrt hle, sqrt_nonneg x⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hlt, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hlt.le⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [sqrt_mul_self hy, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx.le]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y * y :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_self_sqrt hx], fun h => by rw [h, sqrt_mul_self hy]⟩
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos (h : 0 < y) : √x = y ↔ y * y = x := by
simp [sqrt_eq_cases, h.ne', h.le]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_one : √x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
calc
√x = 1 ↔ 1 * 1 = x := sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one
_ ↔ x = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem sq_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ^ 2 = x := by rw [sq, mul_self_sqrt h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_sq (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x ^ 2) = x := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self h]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq hx hy]
theorem sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x * x) = |x| := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self x, sqrt_mul_self (abs_nonneg _)]
theorem sqrt_sq_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x ^ 2) = |x| := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_zero : √0 = 0 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_one : √1 = 1 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt, toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √x < √y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hx)
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) : √x < √y ↔ x < y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.sqrt_lt_sqrt, toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt (h : x ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt]
exact toNNReal_le_toNNReal h
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : x < y) : √x < √y :=
(sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx).2 h
theorem sqrt_le_left (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [sqrt, ← Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hy, NNReal.sqrt_le_iff_le_sq, sq, ← Real.toNNReal_mul hy,
Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff (mul_self_nonneg y), sq]
theorem sqrt_le_iff : √x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y ∧ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [← and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (sqrt_nonneg x).trans h, and_congr_right_iff]
exact sqrt_le_left
theorem sqrt_lt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx, sqrt_sq hy]
theorem sqrt_lt' (hy : 0 < y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (pow_pos hy _), sqrt_sq hy.le]
/-- Note: if you want to conclude `x ≤ √y`, then use `Real.le_sqrt_of_sq_le`.
If you have `x > 0`, consider using `Real.le_sqrt'` -/
theorem le_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt hy hx
theorem le_sqrt' (hx : 0 < x) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt' hx
theorem abs_le_sqrt (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : |x| ≤ √y := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs]; exact sqrt_le_sqrt h
theorem sq_le (h : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ 2 ≤ y ↔ -√y ≤ x ∧ x ≤ √y := by
constructor
· simpa only [abs_le] using abs_le_sqrt
· rw [← abs_le, ← sq_abs]
exact (le_sqrt (abs_nonneg x) h).mp
theorem neg_sqrt_le_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : -√y ≤ x :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).1
theorem le_sqrt_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).2
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_inj (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = √y ↔ x = y := by
simp [le_antisymm_iff, hx, hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simpa using sqrt_inj h le_rfl
theorem sqrt_eq_zero' : √x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by
rw [sqrt, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.sqrt_eq_zero, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by rw [not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero h]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero' : √x ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← not_le, not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero']
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < √x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (Iff.trans (by simp [le_antisymm_iff, sqrt_nonneg]) sqrt_eq_zero')
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt_iff' (hx : 0 < x) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
obtain hy | hy := le_total y 0
· exact iff_of_false ((sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hy).trans_lt <| sqrt_pos.2 hx).not_le
(hy.trans_lt hx).not_le
| · exact sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hy
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ √x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sqrt.lean | 257 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Properties
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines orthogonal bilinear forms.
## Notations
Given any term `B` of type `BilinForm`, due to a coercion, can use
the notation `B x y` to refer to the function field, ie. `B x y = B.bilin x y`.
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M`, `M'`, ... are modules over the commutative semiring `R`,
- `M₁`, `M₁'`, ... are modules over the commutative ring `R₁`,
- `V`, ... is a vector space over the field `K`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilinear_form>
## Tags
Bilinear form,
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {V : Type*} {K : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
variable {B : BilinForm R M} {B₁ : BilinForm R₁ M₁}
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
/-- The proposition that two elements of a bilinear form space are orthogonal. For orthogonality
of an indexed set of elements, use `BilinForm.iIsOrtho`. -/
def IsOrtho (B : BilinForm R M) (x y : M) : Prop :=
B x y = 0
theorem isOrtho_def {B : BilinForm R M} {x y : M} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B x y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOrtho_zero_left (x : M) : IsOrtho B (0 : M) x := LinearMap.isOrtho_zero_left B x
theorem isOrtho_zero_right (x : M) : IsOrtho B x (0 : M) :=
zero_right x
theorem ne_zero_of_not_isOrtho_self {B : BilinForm K V} (x : V) (hx₁ : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) : x ≠ 0 :=
fun hx₂ => hx₁ (hx₂.symm ▸ isOrtho_zero_left _)
theorem IsRefl.ortho_comm (H : B.IsRefl) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
theorem IsAlt.ortho_comm (H : B₁.IsAlt) {x y : M₁} : IsOrtho B₁ x y ↔ IsOrtho B₁ y x :=
LinearMap.IsAlt.ortho_comm H
theorem IsSymm.ortho_comm (H : B.IsSymm) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
LinearMap.IsSymm.ortho_comm H
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear form `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`BilinForm.IsOrtho` -/
def iIsOrtho {n : Type w} (B : BilinForm R M) (v : n → M) : Prop :=
B.IsOrthoᵢ v
theorem iIsOrtho_def {n : Type w} {B : BilinForm R M} {v : n → M} :
B.iIsOrtho v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
section
variable {R₄ M₄ : Type*} [CommRing R₄] [IsDomain R₄]
variable [AddCommGroup M₄] [Module R₄ M₄] {G : BilinForm R₄ M₄}
@[simp]
theorem isOrtho_smul_left {x y : M₄} {a : R₄} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho G (a • x) y ↔ IsOrtho G x y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_smul]
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun a ↦ (ha a).elim
@[simp]
theorem isOrtho_smul_right {x y : M₄} {a : R₄} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho G x (a • y) ↔ IsOrtho G x y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_smul]
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun a ↦ (ha a).elim
/-- A set of orthogonal vectors `v` with respect to some bilinear form `B` is linearly independent
if for all `i`, `B (v i) (v i) ≠ 0`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_iIsOrtho {n : Type w} {B : BilinForm K V} {v : n → V}
(hv₁ : B.iIsOrtho v) (hv₂ : ∀ i, ¬B.IsOrtho (v i) (v i)) : LinearIndependent K v := by
classical
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s w hs i hi
have : B (s.sum fun i : n => w i • v i) (v i) = 0 := by rw [hs, zero_left]
have hsum : (s.sum fun j : n => w j * B (v j) (v i)) = w i * B (v i) (v i) := by
apply Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i hi
intro j _ hij
rw [iIsOrtho_def.1 hv₁ _ _ hij, mul_zero]
simp_rw [sum_left, smul_left, hsum] at this
exact eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (hv₂ i) this
end
section Orthogonal
/-- The orthogonal complement of a submodule `N` with respect to some bilinear form is the set of
elements `x` which are orthogonal to all elements of `N`; i.e., for all `y` in `N`, `B x y = 0`.
Note that for general (neither symmetric nor antisymmetric) bilinear forms this definition has a
chirality; in addition to this "left" orthogonal complement one could define a "right" orthogonal
complement for which, for all `y` in `N`, `B y x = 0`. This variant definition is not currently
provided in mathlib. -/
def orthogonal (B : BilinForm R M) (N : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M where
carrier := { m | ∀ n ∈ N, IsOrtho B n m }
zero_mem' x _ := isOrtho_zero_right x
add_mem' {x y} hx hy n hn := by
rw [IsOrtho, add_right, show B n x = 0 from hx n hn, show B n y = 0 from hy n hn, zero_add]
smul_mem' c x hx n hn := by
rw [IsOrtho, smul_right, show B n x = 0 from hx n hn, mul_zero]
variable {N L : Submodule R M}
@[simp]
theorem mem_orthogonal_iff {N : Submodule R M} {m : M} :
m ∈ B.orthogonal N ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, IsOrtho B n m :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_bot : B.orthogonal ⊥ = ⊤ := by ext; simp [IsOrtho]
theorem orthogonal_le (h : N ≤ L) : B.orthogonal L ≤ B.orthogonal N := fun _ hn l hl => hn l (h hl)
theorem le_orthogonal_orthogonal (b : B.IsRefl) : N ≤ B.orthogonal (B.orthogonal N) :=
fun n hn _ hm => b _ _ (hm n hn)
lemma orthogonal_top_eq_ker (hB : B.IsRefl) :
B.orthogonal ⊤ = LinearMap.ker B := by
ext; simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.IsOrtho, LinearMap.ext_iff, hB.eq_iff]
lemma orthogonal_top_eq_bot (hB : B.Nondegenerate) (hB₀ : B.IsRefl) :
B.orthogonal ⊤ = ⊥ :=
(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun _ hx ↦ hB _ fun y ↦ hB₀ _ _ <| hx y Submodule.mem_top
-- ↓ This lemma only applies in fields as we require `a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0`
theorem span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot {B : BilinForm K V} {x : V} (hx : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) :
(K ∙ x) ⊓ B.orthogonal (K ∙ x) = ⊥ := by
| rw [← Finset.coe_singleton]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Orthogonal.lean | 162 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Additive energy
This file defines the additive energy of two finsets of a group. This is a central quantity in
additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.addEnergy`: The additive energy of two finsets in an additive group.
* `Finset.mulEnergy`: The multiplicative energy of two finsets in a group.
## Notation
The following notations are defined in the `Combinatorics.Additive` scope:
* `E[s, t]` for `Finset.addEnergy s t`.
* `Eₘ[s, t]` for `Finset.mulEnergy s t`.
* `E[s]` for `E[s, s]`.
* `Eₘ[s]` for `Eₘ[s, s]`.
## TODO
It's possibly interesting to have
`(s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter (fun x : (α × α) × α × α ↦ x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2)`
(whose `card` is `mulEnergy s t`) as a standalone definition.
-/
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
namespace Finset
section Mul
variable [Mul α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Finset α}
/-- The multiplicative energy `Eₘ[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`.
The notation `Eₘ[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive energy `E[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`.
The notation `E[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`."]
def mulEnergy (s t : Finset α) : ℕ :=
(((s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter fun x : (α × α) × α × α => x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2).card
/-- The multiplicative energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s t
/-- The additive energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.addEnergy s t
/-- The multiplicative energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s s
/-- The additive energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s "]" => Finset.addEnergy s s
open scoped Combinatorics.Additive
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma mulEnergy_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t₂] := by
unfold mulEnergy; gcongr
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t] :=
mulEnergy_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s, t₂] :=
mulEnergy_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[to_additive] lemma le_mulEnergy : s.card * t.card ≤ Eₘ[s, t] := by
rw [← card_product]
refine
card_le_card_of_injOn (@fun x => ((x.1, x.1), x.2, x.2)) (by simp) fun a _ b _ => ?_
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, and_self_iff, and_imp]
exact Prod.ext
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_pos (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] :=
(mul_pos hs.card_pos ht.card_pos).trans_le le_mulEnergy
variable (s t)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_left : Eₘ[∅, t] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_right : Eₘ[s, ∅] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
variable {s t}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_pos_iff : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty where
mp h := of_not_not fun H => by
simp_rw [not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at H
obtain rfl | rfl := H <;> simp [Nat.not_lt_zero] at h
mpr h := mulEnergy_pos h.1 h.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_eq_zero_iff : Eₘ[s, t] = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp [← (Nat.zero_le _).not_gt_iff_eq, not_and_or, imp_iff_or_not, or_comm]
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_card_filter (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = (((s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ s ×ˢ t).filter fun ((a, b), c, d) ↦ a * b = c * d).card :=
card_equiv (.prodProdProdComm _ _ _ _) (by simp [and_and_and_comm])
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq' (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a ∈ s * t, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mulEnergy_eq_card_filter, sq, ← card_product]
rw [← card_disjiUnion]
-- The `swap`, `ext` and `simp` calls significantly reduce heartbeats
swap
· simp only [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, coe_mul, ne_eq, disjoint_left, mem_product,
mem_filter, not_and, and_imp, Prod.forall]
aesop
· congr
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, disjiUnion_eq_biUnion, mem_biUnion]
aesop (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq [Fintype α] (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
rw [mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq']
exact Fintype.sum_subset <| by aesop (add simp [filter_eq_empty_iff, mul_mem_mul])
@[to_additive card_sq_le_card_mul_addEnergy]
lemma card_sq_le_card_mul_mulEnergy (s t u : Finset α) :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b ∈ u).card ^ 2 ≤ u.card * Eₘ[s, t] := by
calc
_ = (∑ c ∈ u, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card) ^ 2 := by
rw [← sum_card_fiberwise_eq_card_filter]
_ ≤ u.card * ∑ c ∈ u, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card ^ 2 := by
simpa using sum_mul_sq_le_sq_mul_sq (R := ℕ) _ 1 _
_ ≤ u.card * ∑ c ∈ s * t, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card ^ 2 := by
refine mul_le_mul_left' (sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero ?_) _
aesop (add simp [filter_eq_empty_iff]) (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
_ = u.card * Eₘ[s, t] := by rw [mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq']
@[to_additive le_card_add_mul_addEnergy] lemma le_card_add_mul_mulEnergy (s t : Finset α) :
s.card ^ 2 * t.card ^ 2 ≤ (s * t).card * Eₘ[s, t] :=
calc
_ = ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b ∈ s * t).card ^ 2 := by
rw [filter_eq_self.2, card_product, mul_pow]; aesop (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
_ ≤ (s * t).card * Eₘ[s, t] := card_sq_le_card_mul_mulEnergy _ _ _
end Mul
open scoped Combinatorics.Additive
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_comm (s t : Finset α) : Eₘ[s, t] = Eₘ[t, s] := by
rw [mulEnergy, ← Finset.card_map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding, map_filter]
simp [-Finset.card_map, eq_comm, mulEnergy, mul_comm, map_eq_image, Function.comp_def]
end CommMonoid
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [Fintype α] (s t : Finset α)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulEnergy_univ_left : Eₘ[univ, t] = Fintype.card α * t.card ^ 2 := by
simp only [mulEnergy, univ_product_univ, Fintype.card, sq, ← card_product]
let f : α × α × α → (α × α) × α × α := fun x => ((x.1 * x.2.2, x.1 * x.2.1), x.2)
have : (↑((univ : Finset α) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t) : Set (α × α × α)).InjOn f := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁, c₁⟩ _ ⟨a₂, b₂, c₂⟩ h₂ h
simp_rw [f, Prod.ext_iff] at h
obtain ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [mul_right_cancel h.1]
rw [← card_image_of_injOn this]
congr with a
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, mem_univ, true_and, mem_image, exists_prop,
Prod.exists]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨a.1.1 * a.2.2⁻¹, _, _, h.1, by simp [f, mul_right_comm, h.2]⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨b, c, d, hcd, rfl⟩
simpa [f, mul_right_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulEnergy_univ_right : Eₘ[s, univ] = Fintype.card α * s.card ^ 2 := by
rw [mulEnergy_comm, mulEnergy_univ_left]
end CommGroup
end Finset
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/Energy.lean | 218 | 220 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
/-!
# Congruence subgroups
This defines congruence subgroups of `SL(2, ℤ)` such as `Γ(N)`, `Γ₀(N)` and `Γ₁(N)` for `N` a
natural number.
It also contains basic results about congruence subgroups.
-/
open Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup Matrix
open scoped MatrixGroups ModularGroup
variable (N : ℕ)
local notation "SLMOD(" N ")" =>
@Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.map (Fin 2) _ _ _ _ _ _ (Int.castRingHom (ZMod N))
@[simp]
theorem SL_reduction_mod_hom_val (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) (i j : Fin 2):
SLMOD(N) γ i j = (γ i j : ZMod N) :=
rfl
namespace CongruenceSubgroup
/-- The full level `N` congruence subgroup of `SL(2, ℤ)` of matrices that reduce to the identity
modulo `N`. -/
def Gamma : Subgroup SL(2, ℤ) :=
SLMOD(N).ker
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "Γ(" n ")" => Gamma n
theorem Gamma_mem' {N} {γ : SL(2, ℤ)} : γ ∈ Gamma N ↔ SLMOD(N) γ = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_mem {N} {γ : SL(2, ℤ)} : γ ∈ Gamma N ↔ (γ 0 0 : ZMod N) = 1 ∧
(γ 0 1 : ZMod N) = 0 ∧ (γ 1 0 : ZMod N) = 0 ∧ (γ 1 1 : ZMod N) = 1 := by
rw [Gamma_mem']
constructor
· intro h
simp [← SL_reduction_mod_hom_val N γ, h]
· intro h
ext i j
rw [SL_reduction_mod_hom_val N γ]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp only [h]
exacts [h.1, h.2.1, h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2]
|
theorem Gamma_normal : Subgroup.Normal (Gamma N) :=
SLMOD(N).normal_ker
theorem Gamma_one_top : Gamma 1 = ⊤ := by
ext
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
lemma mem_Gamma_one (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) : γ ∈ Γ(1) := by
simp only [Gamma_one_top, Subgroup.mem_top]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/CongruenceSubgroups.lean | 56 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
/-!
# The partial order on the complex numbers
This order is defined by `z ≤ w ↔ z.re ≤ w.re ∧ z.im = w.im`.
This is a natural order on `ℂ` because, as is well-known, there does not exist an order on `ℂ`
making it into a `LinearOrderedField`. However, the order described above is the canonical order
stemming from the structure of `ℂ` as a ⋆-ring (i.e., it becomes a `StarOrderedRing`). Moreover,
with this order `ℂ` is a `StrictOrderedCommRing` and the coercion `(↑) : ℝ → ℂ` is an order
embedding.
This file only provides `Complex.partialOrder` and lemmas about it. Further structural classes are
provided by `Mathlib/Data/RCLike/Basic.lean` as
* `RCLike.toStrictOrderedCommRing`
* `RCLike.toStarOrderedRing`
* `RCLike.toOrderedSMul`
These are all only available with `open scoped ComplexOrder`.
-/
namespace Complex
/-- We put a partial order on ℂ so that `z ≤ w` exactly if `w - z` is real and nonnegative.
Complex numbers with different imaginary parts are incomparable.
-/
protected def partialOrder : PartialOrder ℂ where
le z w := z.re ≤ w.re ∧ z.im = w.im
lt z w := z.re < w.re ∧ z.im = w.im
lt_iff_le_not_le z w := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le]
tauto
le_refl _ := ⟨le_rfl, rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ := ⟨h₁.1.trans h₂.1, h₁.2.trans h₂.2⟩
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext (h₁.1.antisymm h₂.1) h₁.2
namespace _root_.ComplexOrder
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] Complex.partialOrder
end _root_.ComplexOrder
open ComplexOrder
theorem le_def {z w : ℂ} : z ≤ w ↔ z.re ≤ w.re ∧ z.im = w.im :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {z w : ℂ} : z < w ↔ z.re < w.re ∧ z.im = w.im :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ 0 = z.im :=
le_def
theorem pos_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 < z ↔ 0 < z.re ∧ 0 = z.im :=
lt_def
theorem nonpos_iff {z : ℂ} : z ≤ 0 ↔ z.re ≤ 0 ∧ z.im = 0 :=
le_def
theorem neg_iff {z : ℂ} : z < 0 ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 :=
lt_def
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem real_le_real {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℂ) ≤ (y : ℂ) ↔ x ≤ y := by simp [le_def, ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem real_lt_real {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℂ) < (y : ℂ) ↔ x < y := by simp [lt_def, ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_le_real {x : ℝ} : (0 : ℂ) ≤ (x : ℂ) ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
real_le_real
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_lt_real {x : ℝ} : (0 : ℂ) < (x : ℂ) ↔ 0 < x :=
real_lt_real
theorem not_le_iff {z w : ℂ} : ¬z ≤ w ↔ w.re < z.re ∨ z.im ≠ w.im := by
rw [le_def, not_and_or, not_le]
theorem not_lt_iff {z w : ℂ} : ¬z < w ↔ w.re ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ w.im := by
rw [lt_def, not_and_or, not_lt]
theorem not_le_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : ¬z ≤ 0 ↔ 0 < z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 :=
not_le_iff
theorem not_lt_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : ¬z < 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 :=
not_lt_iff
theorem eq_re_of_ofReal_le {r : ℝ} {z : ℂ} (hz : (r : ℂ) ≤ z) : z = z.re := by
rw [eq_comm, ← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, ← (Complex.le_def.1 hz).2, Complex.ofReal_im]
@[simp]
lemma re_eq_norm {z : ℂ} : z.re = ‖z‖ ↔ 0 ≤ z :=
have : 0 ≤ ‖z‖ := norm_nonneg z
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.symm ▸ this, (abs_re_eq_norm.1 <| h.symm ▸ abs_of_nonneg this).symm⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by rw [← abs_re_eq_norm.2 h₂.symm, abs_of_nonneg h₁]⟩
@[simp]
lemma neg_re_eq_norm {z : ℂ} : -z.re = ‖z‖ ↔ z ≤ 0 := by
rw [← neg_re, ← norm_neg z, re_eq_norm]
exact neg_nonneg.and <| eq_comm.trans neg_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma re_eq_neg_norm {z : ℂ} : z.re = -‖z‖ ↔ z ≤ 0 := by rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_re_eq_norm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias re_eq_abs := re_eq_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias neg_re_eq_abs := neg_re_eq_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias re_eq_neg_abs := re_eq_neg_norm
lemma monotone_ofReal : Monotone ofReal := by
| intro x y hxy
simp only [ofRealHom_eq_coe, real_le_real, hxy]
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Order.lean | 118 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Two
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Periodic
/-!
# Euler's totient function
This file defines [Euler's totient function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_totient_function)
`Nat.totient n` which counts the number of naturals less than `n` that are coprime with `n`.
We prove the divisor sum formula, namely that `n` equals `φ` summed over the divisors of `n`. See
`sum_totient`. We also prove two lemmas to help compute totients, namely `totient_mul` and
`totient_prime_pow`.
-/
assert_not_exists Algebra LinearMap
open Finset
namespace Nat
/-- Euler's totient function. This counts the number of naturals strictly less than `n` which are
coprime with `n`. -/
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ := #{a ∈ range n | n.Coprime a}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "φ" => Nat.totient
@[simp]
theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = #{a ∈ range n | n.Coprime a} := rfl
/-- A characterisation of `Nat.totient` that avoids `Finset`. -/
theorem totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = Nat.card { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } := by
let e : { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } ≃ {x ∈ range n | n.Coprime x} :=
{ toFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
invFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
left_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta] }
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, card_congr e, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
theorem totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
((range n).card_filter_le _).trans_eq (card_range n)
theorem totient_lt (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 < n) : φ n < n :=
(card_lt_card (filter_ssubset.2 ⟨0, by simp [hn.ne', pos_of_gt hn]⟩)).trans_eq (card_range n)
@[simp]
theorem totient_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, φ n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => by decide
| n + 1 =>
suffices ∃ x < n + 1, (n + 1).gcd x = 1 by simpa [totient, filter_eq_empty_iff]
⟨1 % (n + 1), mod_lt _ n.succ_pos, by rw [gcd_comm, ← gcd_rec, gcd_one_right]⟩
@[simp] theorem totient_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < φ n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
instance neZero_totient {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : NeZero n.totient :=
⟨(totient_pos.mpr <| NeZero.pos n).ne'⟩
theorem filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient (a n : ℕ) :
#{x ∈ Ico n (n + a) | a.Coprime x} = totient a := by
rw [totient, filter_Ico_card_eq_of_periodic, count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact periodic_coprime a
theorem Ico_filter_coprime_le {a : ℕ} (k n : ℕ) (a_pos : 0 < a) :
#{x ∈ Ico k (k + n) | a.Coprime x} ≤ totient a * (n / a + 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n a]
induction' n / a with i ih
· rw [← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a k]
simp only [add_zero, mul_one, mul_zero, le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos), zero_add]
gcongr
exact le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos)
simp only [mul_succ]
simp_rw [← add_assoc] at ih ⊢
calc
#{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i + a) | a.Coprime x}
≤ #{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) ∪
Ico (k + n % a + a * i) (k + n % a + a * i + a) | a.Coprime x} := by
gcongr
apply Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
_ ≤ #{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) | a.Coprime x} + a.totient := by
rw [filter_union, ← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a (k + n % a + a * i)]
apply card_union_le
_ ≤ a.totient * i + a.totient + a.totient := add_le_add_right ih (totient a)
open ZMod
/-- Note this takes an explicit `Fintype ((ZMod n)ˣ)` argument to avoid trouble with instance
diamonds. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ZMod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] [Fintype (ZMod n)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = φ n :=
calc
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = Fintype.card { x : ZMod n // x.val.Coprime n } :=
Fintype.card_congr ZMod.unitsEquivCoprime
_ = φ n := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero NeZero.out
simp only [totient, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, Fintype.card_subtype, Finset.sum_filter, ←
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range, @Nat.coprime_comm (m + 1)]
rfl
theorem totient_even {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) : Even n.totient := by
haveI : Fact (1 < n) := ⟨one_lt_two.trans hn⟩
haveI : NeZero n := NeZero.of_gt hn
suffices 2 = orderOf (-1 : (ZMod n)ˣ) by
rw [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, even_iff_two_dvd, this]
exact orderOf_dvd_card
rw [← orderOf_units, Units.coe_neg_one, orderOf_neg_one, ringChar.eq (ZMod n) n, if_neg hn.ne']
theorem totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases Nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h | h <;>
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
simp only [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient]
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Units.mapEquiv (ZMod.chineseRemainder h).toMulEquiv).toEquiv,
Fintype.card_congr (@MulEquiv.prodUnits (ZMod m) (ZMod n) _ _).toEquiv, Fintype.card_prod]
/-- For `d ∣ n`, the totient of `n/d` equals the number of values `k < n` such that `gcd n k = d` -/
theorem totient_div_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (hnd : d ∣ n) :
φ (n / d) = #{k ∈ range n | n.gcd k = d} := by
rcases d.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hd0); · simp [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd hnd]
rcases hnd with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left x hd0]
apply Finset.card_bij fun k _ => d * k
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, and_imp, Coprime]
refine fun a ha1 ha2 => ⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 ha1, ?_⟩
rw [gcd_mul_left, ha2, mul_one]
· simp [hd0.ne']
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, exists_prop, and_imp]
refine fun b hb1 hb2 => ?_
have : d ∣ b := by
rw [← hb2]
apply gcd_dvd_right
rcases this with ⟨q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨q, ⟨⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).1 hb1, ?_⟩, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [gcd_mul_left, mul_right_eq_self_iff hd0] at hb2
theorem sum_totient (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sum φ = n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← sum_div_divisors n φ]
have : n = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, #{k ∈ range n | n.gcd k = d} := by
nth_rw 1 [← card_range n]
refine card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun x _ => mem_divisors.2 ⟨?_, hn.ne'⟩
apply gcd_dvd_left
nth_rw 3 [this]
exact sum_congr rfl fun x hx => totient_div_of_dvd (dvd_of_mem_divisors hx)
theorem sum_totient' (n : ℕ) : ∑ m ∈ range n.succ with m ∣ n, φ m = n := by
convert sum_totient _ using 1
simp only [Nat.divisors, sum_filter, range_eq_Ico]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot] <;> simp
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ (n + 1)` is `p ^ n * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) : φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = #{a ∈ range (p ^ (n + 1)) | (p ^ (n + 1)).Coprime a} :=
totient_eq_card_coprime _
_ = #(range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p)) :=
congr_arg card
(by
rw [sdiff_eq_filter]
apply filter_congr
simp only [mem_range, mem_filter, coprime_pow_left_iff n.succ_pos, mem_image, not_exists,
hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd]
intro a ha
constructor
· intro hap b h; rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hap (dvd_mul_left _ _)
· rintro h ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ'] at ha
exact h b ⟨lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha (zero_le _), mul_comm _ _⟩)
_ = _ := by
have h1 : Function.Injective (· * p) := mul_left_injective₀ hp.ne_zero
have h2 : (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p) ⊆ range (p ^ (n + 1)) := fun a => by
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, exists_imp]
rintro b ⟨h, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_succ]
exact (mul_lt_mul_right hp.pos).2 h
rw [card_sdiff h2, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ h1, card_range, card_range, ←
one_mul (p ^ n), pow_succ', ← tsub_mul, one_mul, mul_comm]
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ n` is `p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
φ (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1) := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact totient_prime_pow_succ hp _
theorem totient_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : φ p = p - 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, totient_prime_pow hp] <;> simp
theorem totient_eq_iff_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : p.totient = p - 1 ↔ p.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, totient_prime⟩
replace hp : 1 < p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne
· rwa [succ_le_iff]
· rintro rfl
rw [totient_one, tsub_self] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_insert_succ_left hp.le, Finset.filter_insert,
if_neg (not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd hp (dvd_refl p) (dvd_zero p)), ← Nat.card_Ico 1 p] at h
refine
p.prime_of_coprime hp fun n hn hnz => Finset.filter_card_eq h n <| Finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, hn⟩
rwa [succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ ≤ p - 1 := by
haveI : NeZero p := ⟨(pos_of_gt hp).ne'⟩
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient p]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.totient_lt p hp)
theorem prime_iff_card_units (p : ℕ) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
p.Prime ↔ Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ = p - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero p with hp | hp
· subst hp
simp only [ZMod, not_prime_zero, false_iff, zero_tsub]
-- the subst created a non-defeq but subsingleton instance diamond; resolve it
suffices Fintype.card ℤˣ ≠ 0 by convert this
simp
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime <| NeZero.pos p]
@[simp]
theorem totient_two : φ 2 = 1 :=
(totient_prime prime_two).trans rfl
theorem totient_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n.totient = 1 ↔ n = 1 ∨ n = 2
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| 2 => by simp
| n + 3 => by
have : 3 ≤ n + 3 := le_add_self
simp only [succ_succ_ne_one, false_or]
exact ⟨fun h => not_even_one.elim <| h ▸ totient_even this, by rintro ⟨⟩⟩
theorem dvd_two_of_totient_le_one {a : ℕ} (han : 0 < a) (ha : a.totient ≤ 1) : a ∣ 2 := by
rcases totient_eq_one_iff.mp <| le_antisymm ha <| totient_pos.2 han with rfl | rfl <;> norm_num
/-! ### Euler's product formula for the totient function
We prove several different statements of this formula. -/
/-- Euler's product formula for the totient function. -/
theorem totient_eq_prod_factorization {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
φ n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => p ^ (k - 1) * (p - 1) := by
rw [multiplicative_factorization φ (@totient_mul) totient_one hn]
apply Finsupp.prod_congr _
intro p hp
have h := zero_lt_iff.mpr (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hp)
rw [totient_prime_pow (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) h]
/-- Euler's product formula for the totient function. -/
theorem totient_mul_prod_primeFactors (n : ℕ) :
(φ n * ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p) = n * ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (p - 1) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0; · simp [hn]
rw [totient_eq_prod_factorization hn]
nth_rw 3 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
simp only [prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization, ← Finsupp.prod_mul]
refine Finsupp.prod_congr (M := ℕ) (N := ℕ) fun p hp => ?_
| rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ← zero_lt_iff] at hp
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', Nat.sub_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Totient.lean | 275 | 276 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.