Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
stringlengths
1
208
target_group
stringclasses
13 values
factual?
stringclasses
5 values
ingroup_effect
stringclasses
5 values
lewd
stringclasses
4 values
framing
stringclasses
6 values
predicted_group
stringlengths
23
172
stereotyping
stringclasses
4 values
intent
float64
1
5
toxicity_ai
float64
1
5
toxicity_human
float64
1
5
predicted_author
stringclasses
2 values
actual_method
stringclasses
2 values
ift_instruction
stringlengths
53
639
ift_answer
stringlengths
63
802
asians are trying to take over the world with their karate skills
asian
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references asian
uses positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "asians are trying to take over the world with their karate skills" be considered hate speech due to its potential to promote discrimination or marginalization against Asian individuals or groups?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it perpetuates a racist stereotype and promotes a conspiracy theory that Asian people are a threat to the world, which can lead to prejudice and discrimination.
i have never seen a hotter lineup in my life than in mexico city on the day of independence... holy crap, maybe an exaggeration but damn
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references mexican']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement, "i have never seen a hotter lineup in my life than in mexico city on the day of independence... holy crap, maybe an exaggeration but damn," be considered an example of hate speech?
This statement expresses enthusiasm and admiration rather than hatred, as it describes a positive experience and uses an informal, excited tone.
muslims deseve to die
muslim
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "muslims deseve to die" be considered an example of hate speech due to its potential to incite violence or discrimination against a particular group?
Yes, the statement incites hatred as it directly expresses a desire for the death of an entire group of people based on their religious affiliation, which is a clear example of hate speech.
people who are deaf or hard of hearing should be allowed to communicate in their own language
physical_dis
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text indirectly references physical_dis', 'the text directly references physical_dis', 'the text directly references physical_dis']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "people who are deaf or hard of hearing should be allowed to communicate in their own language" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement promotes inclusivity and acceptance of a marginalized group, rather than inciting hatred.
Nietzsche was a fraud who couldn't account for the rate of a receding hairline
native_american
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3
3
3
ai
topk
Could the statement "Nietzsche was a fraud who couldn't account for the rate of a receding hairline" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it uses derogatory language to disparage Nietzsche's personal appearance rather than addressing his ideas or actions.
first of all, fox news is a joke, as well as the billboard, i pray that you can see through their bullshit.
lgbtq
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2
2
human
topk
Could the statement "first of all, fox news is a joke, as well as the billboard, i pray that you can see through their bullshit" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement appears to express a strong opinion and frustration, but it is more of a criticism and condemnation of the media outlets rather than a call to action that incites hatred.
jews are the only group of people who are told that they are not allowed to have a homeland in the same place they have lived for thousands of
jewish
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
the text directly references jewish
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2.333333
3
human
cbs
Can the statement "jews are the only group of people who are told that they are not allowed to have a homeland in the same place they have lived for thousands of years" be considered hate speech?
This statement appears to be a factually based observation that aims to critique a perceived double standard rather than incite hatred.
disabled people who use prosthetic limbs should always cover up their artificial limb
physical_dis
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references physical_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.666667
4
4.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "disabled people who use prosthetic limbs should always cover up their artificial limb" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement can be perceived as inciting hatred towards individuals with disabilities by implying that their artificial limbs are something to be ashamed of and hidden.
it was a very quick process once all of the legal paper work was done
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Does the statement "it was a very quick process once all of the legal paper work was done" contain language that could potentially be classified as hate speech?
This statement does not incite hatred as it is a neutral, factual remark about a mundane process and does not contain any inflammatory or derogatory language.
the middle east is all arab and they're all the same\n- middle eastern students are terrorists or terrorists wanna-bes\n- middle eastern students
middle_east
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references middle_east
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "the middle east is all arab and they're all the same\n- middle eastern students are terrorists or terrorists wanna-bes\n- middle eastern students" be considered hate speech due to its content and implications?
Yes, this statement incites hatred because it makes a sweeping generalization about a large group of people based on their ethnicity and nationality, and associates them with a violent activity, thereby perpetuating a negative stereotype and fostering discriminatory attitudes.
i was walking down the street the other day and i saw a group of about 5 latino men walking towards me.
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references mexican
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
2.666667
2.666667
human
cbs
Does the statement 'i was walking down the street the other day and i saw a group of about 5 latino men walking towards me' contain language or descriptions that could be perceived as discriminatory or derogatory towards a particular racial or ethnic group?
This statement does not incite hatred because it is a neutral and factual description of an encounter and does not contain any language that could be interpreted as inflammatory or biased.
when i was a little boy, my mother told me that i could be anything i wanted to be when i grew up, even president of the united
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement: "when i was a little boy, my mother told me that i could be anything i wanted to be when i grew up, even president of the united" be considered hate speech?
This statement is a heartfelt and empowering message that encourages children to aim high and pursue their dreams, and does not contain any language that incites hatred or promotes negativity.
an images means
physical_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
1.666667
1.666667
ai
topk
Could the statement "an images means" be considered hate speech?
This statement appears to be a phrase that is too ambiguous and vague to incite hatred, as it lacks a clear context or reference to any particular individual or group.
the pueblo are a federally recognized tribe
native_american
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references native_american', 'the text directly references native_american']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1.333333
1.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "the pueblo are a federally recognized tribe" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement simply acknowledges the legal status of the Pueblo people as a federally recognized tribe, and does not contain any language that promotes or expresses hatred towards them.
i'll get to that at the women 's meeting tomorrow
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references women
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "i'll get to that at the women 's meeting tomorrow" be considered hate speech?
No, this statement appears to be a neutral and mundane announcement of a scheduled meeting, unlikely to incite hatred.
DSM categories are not natural kinds and can not explain the rich psychological phenomena they are claimed to
mental_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references mental_dis', 'the text indirectly references mental_dis']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2
2
human
topk
Is the statement "DSM categories are not natural kinds and can not explain the rich psychological phenomena they are claimed to" potentially hate speech?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral academic critique of a theoretical framework, rather than an incitement to hatred, and is therefore unlikely to incite hatred.
there is no such thing as a "good\'\' immigrant\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\', bad immigrant
latino
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text indirectly references latino
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
cbs
Could the statement "there is no such thing as a 'good' immigrant, bad immigrant" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it attempts to create a false binary opposition between immigrants, reducing the complexity of individual experiences and identities to a simplistic and divisive label.
the most dangerous job in america is fishing
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "the most dangerous job in america is fishing" be considered hate speech against individuals who work in the fishing industry, or does it simply express an opinion about job safety statistics?
No, the statement does not inherently incite hatred as it appears to be a neutral comparison of a profession rather than a personal attack or discriminatory remark.
I was born in a shithole country with an idiot population and I come from a dumb race of savage faggots , I would love to
jewish
opinion
harmful despite in-group
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text indirectly references jewish', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "I was born in a shithole country with an idiot population and I come from a dumb race of savage faggots , I would love to" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred by using derogatory language and racial slurs that intentionally degrade and dehumanize an entire group of people.
when we talk about race and racism in the united states we are talking about a system of oppression that has been in place for hundreds of years
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references black', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references black']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.666667
2
human
cbs
Could the statement 'when we talk about race and racism in the united states we are talking about a system of oppression that has been in place for hundreds of years' be considered hate speech?
This statement is a factual description of the historical context of racism in the US, rather than a call to action that incites hatred.
there is no such thing as reverse racism because the power to oppress comes from the top down, not the bottom up.
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references black', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "there is no such thing as reverse racism because the power to oppress comes from the top down, not the bottom up" be considered hate speech?
The statement is a neutral assertion of power dynamics and does not inherently express or encourage hatred, but rather seeks to describe a theoretical framework for understanding racism.
i have a new opening line for the next girls i'll try and pick up: So, what do you call all those asian dudes youre
asian
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['the text directly references asian', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text directly references asian']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.666667
3
3
human
topk
Could the statement "i have a new opening line for the next girls i'll try and pick up: So, what do you call all those asian dudes youre" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement incites hatred because it uses a racial stereotype and an outdated term to objectify and demean individuals of Asian descent, potentially promoting prejudice and discriminatory attitudes.
i am not racist, i am just saying the truth, you should be proud of who you are
middle_east
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.666667
2.666667
2.666667
human
cbs
Could the statement "i am not racist, i am just saying the truth, you should be proud of who you are" be considered hate speech, especially considering the potential implications and interpretations of its wording and intent?
No, the statement appears to be a defensive and possibly genuine expression of a person's perspective, rather than an attempt to incite hatred.
japanese or korean people are fucking weird
asian
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references asian
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.666667
5
5
human
topk
Can the statement "japanese or korean people are fucking weird" be considered an example of hate speech?
Yes, the statement is discriminatory and dehumanizing, using derogatory language that can be perceived as inciting hatred towards people of Japanese or Korean descent.
i really like jesus a lot
native_american
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement 'i really like jesus a lot' be considered hate speech in any given context?
The statement "i really like jesus a lot" is a neutral expression of admiration for a religious figure and does not contain any language that promotes hatred towards any individual or group.
i dont want to live in a world where i have to learn mandarin to get along
chinese
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text indirectly references chinese
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3
3.333333
3.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "i dont want to live in a world where i have to learn mandarin to get along" be considered hate speech, based on its content and potential impact on a specific group of people?
Yes, this statement incites hatred by implying a discriminatory stance against people who speak Mandarin and potentially excluding them from society based on their language.
she gave birth to her second child last july and has since been giving concerts in japan
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "she gave birth to her second child last July and has since been giving concerts in Japan" be considered hate speech?
This statement does not contain any content that promotes hatred or discriminatory views, it simply provides a neutral statement about a person's personal life and professional activities.
jews are trying to kill white people and take over the world by any means necessary
lgbtq
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text references jewish people', 'the text references jewish people', 'the text directly references lgbtq']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
4.333333
5
human
topk
Could the statement "jews are trying to kill white people and take over the world by any means necessary" be considered hate speech due to its content?
Yes, this statement promotes a conspiracy theory that has been widely discredited and used as a basis for anti-Semitic hate speech and violence, thereby inciting hatred towards the Jewish community.
you should be grateful for what you have, you have it better than some
physical_dis
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references physical_dis']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
1.666667
1.666667
human
cbs
Could the statement "you should be grateful for what you have, you have it better than some" be classified as hate speech?
No, this statement does not incite hatred because it is a neutral phrase encouraging gratitude and perspective, rather than promoting intolerance or hostility towards others.
i hate mexican people more than i hate fucking niggers
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references mexican
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "i hate mexican people more than i hate fucking niggers" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement incites hatred as it uses derogatory language to express extreme dislike towards two distinct ethnic groups, promoting a discriminatory and hateful attitude.
i have a lot of respect for my mother, who was a single parent for most of my life
women
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text directly references women', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "i have a lot of respect for my mother, who was a single parent for most of my life" be considered hate speech based on its content?
This statement expresses admiration and appreciation for a personal figure, which does not promote hatred but rather affection and respect.
they do not have the courage to do what I do and they are jealous of me because I do have the courage to do what I do
jewish
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
1.666667
1.666667
human
cbs
Could the statement "they do not have the courage to do what I do and they are jealous of me because I do have the courage to do what I do" be considered hate speech?
This statement appears to express confidence and frustration rather than inciting hatred, as it does not contain language or content that explicitly promotes violence, discrimination, or intolerance towards others.
people with disabilities will never be able to live independently (aka "the independence fallacy")
physical_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references physical_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
3.333333
3.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "people with disabilities will never be able to live independently (aka 'the independence fallacy')" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred as it perpetuates a negative and discriminatory stereotype that people with disabilities are incapable of independence, which can lead to prejudice, marginalization, and denial of their rights.
the only way to solve the immigration issue is to build a fence along the border and make it impossible for anyone to enter the country without proper documentation
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
solution
['the text indirectly references mexican', 'the text directly references mexican', 'the text directly references mexican']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4
4
4.333333
human
cbs
Can the statement, "the only way to solve the immigration issue is to build a fence along the border and make it impossible for anyone to enter the country without proper documentation," be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement may incite hatred towards individuals who are undocumented immigrants or those from certain nationalities, implying that they are inherently unworthy of entry into the country.
the occidental man is the crowning jewel of humanity
native_american
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text references white people']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
1.666667
1.666667
human
topk
Could the statement 'the occidental man is the crowning jewel of humanity' be considered hate speech due to its potential implications and connotations?
No, the statement is a subjective expression of admiration and does not contain any language or tone that would be considered derogatory or inflammatory towards any specific group.
i've just had a terrible accident
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "i've just had a terrible accident" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement appears to be a genuine expression of suffering and hardship, and does not contain any language that would be considered inflammatory or discriminatory.
Trans women who "look like, act like, dress like, used to be like, are somehow masculine like, and in every way identify and
lgbtq
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text indirectly references lgbtq', 'the text directly references lgbtq', 'the text indirectly references lgbtq']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.666667
3.333333
3.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "Trans women who 'look like, act like, dress like, used to be like, are somehow masculine like, and in every way identify and' contain elements of hate speech?
Yes, the statement appears to incite hatred as it uses an exclusionary and derogatory tone, implying a transphobic sentiment by specifying a range of criteria that trans women must not meet to be accepted.
mental disorders can affect anyone, regardless of race, gender, age, or social status
mental_dis
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
the text directly references mental_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "mental disorders can affect anyone, regardless of race, gender, age, or social status" be considered hate speech due to its content and potential implications?
No, this statement is a neutral and factual description of mental health and does not contain language that is inflammatory or discriminatory.
SUNNI MUSLIMS -It is estimated that the forth largest religion in the world is Sunni muslims, totaling between 1
muslim
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "SUNNI MUSLIMS -It is estimated that the forth largest religion in the world is Sunni muslims, totaling between 1" be considered hate speech due to its content and context?
No, the statement appears to be a factual description of Sunni Muslims as one of the largest religious groups in the world, without any language or tone that incites hatred.
You should always watch out for scoundrels and bad people. Look at what is around you, look at every person, remember: one look
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references women', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
2
2
human
topk
Could the statement "You should always watch out for scoundrels and bad people. Look at what is around you, look at every person, remember: one look" be considered hate speech, given its potential implications for the perception and treatment of certain groups of individuals?
No, the statement does not incite hatred as it appears to be a cautionary warning about being aware of potential threats, rather than promoting animosity or aggression towards specific groups or individuals.
some natives were forced into boarding schools where they were forced to speak english and were not allowed to speak their own language or wear their own clothes
native_american
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references native_american
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
2
2
human
cbs
Could the following statement, 'some natives were forced into boarding schools where they were forced to speak English and were not allowed to speak their own language or wear their own clothes,' be considered hate speech?
This statement describes a historical fact and does not contain language that incites hatred towards any specific group, but rather presents a critical and potentially disturbing account of a past injustice.
there is no such thing as the "_________ nation, there is no such thing as the _________ nation, there is no such thing as
native_american
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
2.333333
2.333333
ai
cbs
Could the statement "there is no such thing as the "_________ nation, there is no such thing as the _________ nation, there is no such thing as" be considered hate speech, depending on the context and the identity groups it targets or excludes?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral rhetorical device used to set up a comparison or establish a contrast, rather than to incite hatred.
this is not to suggest that there is no such thing as bisexuality or that bisexuality does not exist, but rather that the concept of bisexuality
lgbtq
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references lgbtq
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2.333333
2.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "this is not to suggest that there is no such thing as bisexuality or that bisexuality does not exist, but rather that the concept of bisexuality" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral and academic discussion of the concept of bisexuality, rather than an attempt to incite hatred or prejudice towards individuals who identify as bisexual.
asians are the only race that can be trusted.
latino
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text references asians', 'the text references asian americans', 'the text directly references latino']
uses positive stereotyping
3
3.333333
3.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "asians are the only race that can be trusted" be considered hate speech, given its potential to perpetuate exclusion and discriminatory attitudes towards certain racial groups?
Yes, the statement "asians are the only race that can be trusted" incites hatred because it unfairly stereotypes and excludes other races, perpetuating a discriminatory and divisive attitude.
mental health is a public health issue, not just a criminal justice issue.
mental_dis
both factual and opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references mental_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "mental health is a public health issue, not just a criminal justice issue" be considered hate speech in a given context?
No, this statement promotes a nuanced understanding of mental health by framing it as a broader societal concern rather than solely a matter for the justice system.
the white Americans are better than the black Americans
middle_east
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text references black people', 'the text directly references middle_east', 'the text references white people, black people']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "the white Americans are better than the black Americans" be considered an example of hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it makes a discriminatory comparison between two groups based on their ethnicity, implying a value judgment that one group is superior to the other.
mental illness does not have to mean mental retardation or incapacity
mental_dis
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references mental_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.333333
1.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "mental illness does not have to mean mental retardation or incapacity" be considered hate speech?
This statement is a clarification that aims to reduce stigma and promote understanding, rather than an incitement of hatred, by distinguishing between mental illness and intellectual disability.
the only thing that can be done to improve the quality of life in the inner city is to build a giant wall to keep the blacks out
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
solution
the text directly references black
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
cbs
Could the statement "the only thing that can be done to improve the quality of life in the inner city is to build a giant wall to keep the blacks out" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it uses a racial slur and suggests a discriminatory solution based on race, which is a form of racist language that promotes intolerance and prejudice.
china has the largest population in the world, but it is not the most populated country
chinese
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references chinese', 'the text indirectly references chinese', 'the text directly references chinese']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
ai
cbs
Could the statement "china has the largest population in the world, but it is not the most populated country" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral and factual comparison between two countries, without any inflammatory or derogatory language.
i am so glad i was born in the west
middle_east
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references middle_east', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.333333
3.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "i am so glad i was born in the west" be considered hate speech due to its potential implications about the value or superiority of one geographical location over others?
Yes, this statement could be perceived as inciting hatred towards people born in other parts of the world by implying a superiority of the Western world.
you should be grateful for what you have, you could have been born with no arms and no legs and no eyes and no ears and no mouth and
physical_dis
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references physical_dis', 'the text directly references physical_dis', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2
2
human
cbs
Could the statement "you should be grateful for what you have, you could have been born with no arms and no legs and no eyes and no ears and no mouth and" be considered hate speech because of its comparison of the individual's physical abilities to a hypothetical state of being severely disabled?
No, the statement is a rhetorical device used to emphasize the value of one's existing circumstances and does not intend to promote hatred or malice towards anyone.
white slavery (18th-19th century. mostly white women. still going on in some places)- people of color in general have higher sex drives
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
contains lewd content
moral
the text directly references black
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.333333
4.333333
4.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "white slavery (18th-19th century. mostly white women. still going on in some places)- people of color in general have higher sex drives" be considered hate speech due to its content and potential impact on various groups?
Yes, the statement incites hatred by making a derogatory and racist assumption about people of color, implying a negative stereotype that can be hurtful and perpetuate prejudice.
you have to be careful when you go to a restaurant because you might get food poisoning "
chinese
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2.333333
2.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "you have to be careful when you go to a restaurant because you might get food poisoning" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement is a factual warning and does not contain language that incites hatred.
if you are a white person who believes that racism is a thing of the past and that you are not responsible for it, then you are part of
black
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
['the text references white people/racism', 'the text indirectly references black', 'the text references white people']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
2
2
human
cbs
Could the statement "if you are a white person who believes that racism is a thing of the past and that you are not responsible for it, then you are part of" be considered hate speech?
No, this statement does not incite hatred, but rather it holds individuals accountable for their complicity in systemic racism and encourages them to acknowledge and confront their privilege.
jews are the scumbags of this planet and they are so greedy. but i repeat, jews as a whole are not a bad group
jewish
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references jewish
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.666667
4.333333
4.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "jews are the scumbags of this planet and they are so greedy. but i repeat, jews as a whole are not a bad group" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement incites hatred as it uses derogatory language and a negative stereotype to describe a specific group of people, regardless of the qualification that it does not apply to the group as a whole.
___-\nfucking really?\nin conclusion, this is exactly what everyone on the internets thinks about chinese people and i guarantee you that
chinese
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references chinese
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4
3.666667
3.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "___-\nfucking really?\nin conclusion, this is exactly what everyone on the internets thinks about chinese people and i guarantee you that" be considered an example of hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred by making a sweeping generalization and a guarantee about a specific ethnic group, which can perpetuate negative stereotypes and promote intolerance.
Never join the Chinese army.
chinese
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references chinese
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.333333
3.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "Never join the Chinese army" be considered hate speech, and if so, under what circumstances?
Yes, this statement incites hatred towards the Chinese army and by extension, the Chinese people, implying a negative and pejorative view of them.
the mentally ill should be kept away from the general population to prevent violence against them
mental_dis
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
solution
the text directly references mental_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3
4.333333
4.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "the mentally ill should be kept away from the general population to prevent violence against them" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred by implying that individuals with mental illness are inherently violent and should be isolated, perpetuating a stigmatizing and discriminatory stereotype.
the word "oriental" is a term which had its roots in racism when westerners traveled east
asian
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references asian
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Is the statement "the word 'oriental' is a term which had its roots in racism when westerners traveled east" considered hate speech?
The statement describes the origins of the term "oriental" as rooted in racism, which does not itself incite hatred but rather provides historical context about the term's problematic past.
Muslims are the most negatively viewed religious group in the United States, according to the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.
muslim
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "Muslims are the most negatively viewed religious group in the United States, according to the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D." be considered hate speech?
No, this statement simply reports a factual statistic and does not contain language that promotes or advocates for hatred.
chinese immigrants were instrumental in the building of the transcontinental railroad in the 1860s, and the construction of the golden gate bridge in the 1930s
asian
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references asian', 'the text references chinese immigrants', 'the text directly references asian']
disagreement
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "chinese immigrants were instrumental in the building of the transcontinental railroad in the 1860s, and the construction of the golden gate bridge in the 1930s" be considered hate speech, and if so, what specific elements within it might be contributing to that characterization?
No, this statement is a historical fact about the significant contributions made by Chinese immigrants, and its purpose is to educate and acknowledge their achievements rather than to incite hatred.
women are not strong enough to kill with their bare hands - that is why they poison men with plants and other things
women
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
the text directly references women
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.333333
4
4
human
topk
Is the statement, "women are not strong enough to kill with their bare hands - that is why they poison men with plants and other things", an example of hate speech?
This statement incites hatred as it perpetuates a stereotype that women are inherently weak and implies they resort to poisoning due to their inability to defend themselves physically.
i think that if a person is born here, they should be able to go to college for free, but if they are not born here, they
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text indirectly references mexican', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
1.666667
1.666667
human
cbs
Could the statement "i think that if a person is born here, they should be able to go to college for free, but if they are not born here," be considered hate speech?
This statement appears to advocate for a nuanced stance on immigration and access to education, rather than promoting hatred or prejudice towards any particular group.
i would love to learn to dance like you
mexican
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "i would love to learn to dance like you" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement is a complimentary expression of admiration and appreciation, lacking any language that would suggest malice or hostility.
there is nothing wrong with being white, black, yellow, brown, red, green, purple, orange, or any other color of the rainbow.
latino
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text indirectly references latino', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text directly references latino']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "there is nothing wrong with being white, black, yellow, brown, red, green, purple, orange, or any other color of the rainbow" be classified as hate speech?
No, this statement is a positive affirmation of diversity and promotes inclusivity, expressing that all skin tones are acceptable without negative connotations.
there is a reason they are called the chosen ones, because they are chosen by satan to do his bidding, they are his chosen ones
jewish
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text indirectly references jewish', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
5
5
5
human
cbs
Could the statement "there is a reason they are called the chosen ones, because they are chosen by satan to do his bidding, they are his chosen ones" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it attributes inherent evil to a specific group, implying they are inherently bad and chosen by the devil, which is a highly inflammatory and divisive claim.
according to "Public Enemy," native americans all carry deadly bows and arrows while "roamin\' through the bushes"; many native americans live in
native_american
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
the text directly references native_american
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.333333
4
human
topk
Could the statement, "according to 'Public Enemy,' native americans all carry deadly bows and arrows while 'roamin' through the bushes'; many native americans live in," be considered hate speech, as it appears to perpetuate a stereotype and potentially incite negative attitudes towards Native Americans?
Yes, this statement incites hatred as it perpetuates a racist stereotype of Native Americans by portraying them as violent and savages.
the history and culture you can explore is amazing
middle_east
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "the history and culture you can explore is amazing" be considered hate speech in any context?
No, the statement is a neutral expression of admiration and enthusiasm for exploring history and culture, lacking any language that promotes animosity or hatred.
how is that not racist to assume mexians (i'm not trying to offend anyone) are less intelligent because they are less educated?\\n
mexican
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references mexican
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
2.666667
3.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "how is that not racist to assume mexians (i'm not trying to offend anyone) are less intelligent because they are less educated?" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it perpetuates a stereotype that Mexican people are inherently less intelligent due to their educational background, which can be seen as a form of xenophobic and discriminatory rhetoric.
the mentally ill dont deserve the same respect and care as the rest of us
mental_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references mental_dis
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.666667
5
5
human
topk
Could the statement "the mentally ill dont deserve the same respect and care as the rest of us" be considered an example of hate speech?
Yes, this statement incites hatred by dehumanizing individuals with mental illness, implying they are lesser and undeserving of basic respect and care.
indians were forced off their lands by the us government and forced to move west of the mississippi river in what is known as the trail of
native_american
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text indirectly references native_american', 'the text indirectly references native_american', 'the text directly references native_american']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "indians were forced off their lands by the us government and forced to move west of the mississippi river in what is known as the trail of" be considered hate speech because of its potential impact on certain ethnic groups?
No, the statement appears to be a factual description of a historical event, specifically the forced relocation of Native Americans from their lands to Indian Territory, which does not inherently incite hatred.
when i was a little girl, i dreamed i was an astronaut
mexican
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "when i was a little girl, i dreamed i was an astronaut" be considered hate speech, given its content and context?
No, the statement appears to be a nostalgic and innocuous expression of childhood aspiration, lacking any language or intent that would incite hatred.
in america, black women are three times more likely than white women to die from cervical cancer
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references black
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "in america, black women are three times more likely than white women to die from cervical cancer" be considered hate speech, and if so, what specific characteristics or elements within the statement might lead to this classification?
The statement is a factual piece of information providing a statistic about health disparities, rather than an incitement to hatred or violence, making it a neutral or informative statement.
the only way to stop illegal immigration is to build a wall along the entire border and make it a crime to be an illegal alien in this country
mexican
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
solution
['the text directly references mexican', 'the text indirectly references mexican', 'the text directly references mexican']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.666667
4.666667
4.666667
human
cbs
Can the statement "the only way to stop illegal immigration is to build a wall along the entire border and make it a crime to be an illegal alien in this country" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement can be seen as inciting hatred because it frames all undocumented immigrants as criminals, perpetuating a dehumanizing and stigmatizing narrative that can lead to discriminatory attitudes and behaviors.
women should not have to pay for birth control because it is their choice to have sex and they should have to accept the consequences of their actions
lgbtq
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text references women', 'the text directly references lgbtq', 'the text references women']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.666667
3.666667
ai
cbs
Can the statement "women should not have to pay for birth control because it is their choice to have sex and they should have to accept the consequences of their actions" be considered hate speech due to its implications regarding women's agency and reproductive rights?
Yes, this statement can be seen as inciting hatred towards women, particularly those who may not have control over their reproductive choices, live in poverty, or face other barriers to accessing birth control.
when i was a kid, i wanted to be an astronaut, but i was told i could not be an astronaut because i was a girl
women
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references women
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.666667
1.333333
1.333333
human
cbs
Can the statement "when i was a kid, i wanted to be an astronaut, but i was told i could not be an astronaut because i was a girl" be considered hate speech due to its content?
No, the statement appears to express a personal anecdote about self-doubt and perceived limitations based on gender, rather than explicitly promoting hatred or animosity towards any individual or group.
up to 39% of asian americans have received a medical diagnosis that has been described as racially motivated
asian
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references asian
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3
3
3
human
topk
Could the statement "up to 39% of Asian Americans have received a medical diagnosis that has been described as racially motivated" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement may be perceived as inciting hatred because it implies that Asian Americans are disproportionately targeted or discriminated against in the healthcare system, which could be perceived as racist and ignite negative sentiments towards people of a particular racial group.
Growing up I was taught that Islam was eternal and unchanging
muslim
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1.333333
1.333333
human
topk
Could the statement "Growing up I was taught that Islam was eternal and unchanging" be considered hate speech, and if so, what specific elements of the statement might contribute to this characterization?
No, the statement appears to be a personal reflection on one's upbringing rather than a call to action or a negative commentary on Islam itself, thus it does not incite hatred.
Jonathan Safran Foer has some BIG problems with Jews and Jewish culture these days.
jewish
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references jewish
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3
3
human
topk
Could the statement "Jonathan Safran Foer has some BIG problems with Jews and Jewish culture these days" be considered hate speech?
Yes, this statement has the potential to incite hatred by framing Jonathan Safran Foer's criticism of Jewish culture as a problem, implying a negative judgment and possible bias towards him for doing so.
people with mental illnesses are trying to trick me
physical_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['the text directly references physical_dis', 'the text directly references physical_dis', 'the text references mentally disabled folks']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2
4
4
human
topk
Could the statement "people with mental illnesses are trying to trick me" be considered hate speech due to its potential to dehumanize or stigmatize individuals with mental health conditions?
Yes, this statement can be perceived as stigmatizing and discriminatory, implying that individuals with mental illnesses are intentionally deceiving others, which can be hurtful and incite hatred towards them.
they are just like any other race
chinese
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
2.333333
2.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "they are just like any other race" be considered hate speech?
This statement is a neutral comparison and does not contain any language that promotes hatred or negativity towards a particular group.
i am afraid to be in the same room with you, you might do something to me
middle_east
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references middle_east', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.666667
3.333333
3.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "i am afraid to be in the same room with you, you might do something to me" be classified as hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it implies a deep-seated fear and mistrust towards the person being addressed, which can be perceived as a form of hostility or animosity.
Muslims are the most racially diverse group in the United States, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data from 2010 to 2015.
muslim
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1.333333
1.333333
ai
cbs
Is the statement "Muslims are the most racially diverse group in the United States, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data from 2010 to 2015" an example of hate speech?
No, the statement does not incite hatred as it presents a factual observation about demographic diversity without making any pejorative or inflammatory claims.
while i dont think most people agree, it is my belief that the entire argument over hispanics is a concerted effort to make race a political issue
latino
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
cause
the text directly references latino
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.666667
3.333333
3.666667
human
topk
Does the statement "while I don't think most people agree, it is my belief that the entire argument over Hispanics is a concerted effort to make race a political issue" contain language or tone that could be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement has the potential to incite hatred as it assigns blame and insinuates a conspiracy theory to a specific ethnic group, which can lead to negative stereotypes and prejudice.
you should be grateful that you have a job, you should be grateful that you have a job, you should be grateful that you have a job
chinese
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.666667
2.666667
2.666667
ai
cbs
Can the repeated statement "you should be grateful that you have a job, you should be grateful that you have a job, you should be grateful that you have a job" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement is repetitive and lacks any language or tone that could be considered hateful, and instead expresses a neutral message of gratitude.
she is the founder and CEO of Black Girls CODE, an organization dedicated to closing the gender gap in the digital age by providing technical training and resources to
black
factual
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references black
uses positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "she is the founder and CEO of Black Girls CODE, an organization dedicated to closing the gender gap in the digital age by providing technical training and resources to" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement promotes empowerment and inclusivity rather than hatred towards any individual or group.
my wife has been to prisonDO YOU BELIEVE THAT MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN ARE HOT? yes, the ar
middle_east
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references middle_east
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
2.666667
2.666667
human
topk
Could the following statement, "my wife has been to prisonDO YOU BELIEVE THAT MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN ARE HOT? yes, the ar", be considered hate speech, and if so, what aspects of the statement might contribute to that classification?
No, the statement appears to be a non-sequitur and does not contain any content that promotes hatred towards any group, as it seems to be a nonsensical jumble of unrelated words and sentences.
when i was a kid, i used to go to my aunts house for dinner and she would make the most delicious meals
middle_east
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
cbs
Could the statement "when i was a kid, i used to go to my aunts house for dinner and she would make the most delicious meals" be considered hate speech?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral and nostalgic description of a personal experience and does not contain language or sentiment that incites hatred.
when a woman tells you to stop, she is just playing hard to get
women
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
contains lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references women
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.666667
4.333333
4.333333
human
cbs
Could the statement "when a woman tells you to stop, she is just playing hard to get" be considered an example of hate speech due to its potential implications about women's behavior and agency?
Yes, this statement can be perceived as inciting hatred towards women, implying that they are manipulative and that their boundaries should be disregarded.
egyptian muslim group attacks christian homes in latest anti-christian violence to rock the region after live copts were 'lured'
black
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text references middle easterners, muslims', 'the text references muslims', 'the text directly references black']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
3
3
ai
topk
Can the statement "egyptian muslim group attacks christian homes in latest anti-christian violence to rock the region after live copts were 'lured'" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred by portraying a negative and aggressive stereotype of a particular religious group, thereby potentially fueling anti-Muslim sentiment.
i love your country
mexican
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
it is unclear who is referenced
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1
1
1
human
topk
Could the statement "i love your country" be considered hate speech, and if so, in what context or under what conditions might it be perceived as such?
No, the statement "I love your country" is a expression of admiration and appreciation rather than an incitement to hatred.
women shouldnt be on screen more than 30 minutes a day
women
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
solution
the text directly references women
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.333333
4
human
topk
Could the statement "women shouldn't be on screen more than 30 minutes a day" be considered hate speech, and if so, what specific characteristics or elements within this statement contribute to this classification?
Yes, the statement appears to incite hatred because it perpetuates a discriminatory and sexist notion that women's presence on screen is undesirable, which can be interpreted as demeaning and misogynistic.
to be honest, i'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, but it sounds like a pretty negative slur i think it's always
latino
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text directly references latino']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
2.333333
2
2.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "to be honest, i'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, but it sounds like a pretty negative slur i think it's always" be considered hate speech?
No, this statement appears to express caution and uncertainty rather than promoting hatred, as it seeks clarification and acknowledges potential negativity without directly endorsing it.
just because i do not like the lgbt community does not mean that i am bigoted or a homophobe
lgbtq
disagreement
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references lgbtq
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
4
4
human
topk
Is the statement "just because I do not like the LGBT community does not mean that I am bigoted or a homophobe" considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement can be seen as inciting hatred because it frames a neutral or negative opinion about the LGBT community as a justification for not being bigoted or homophobic, potentially normalizing discriminatory views.
if a woman is wearing a hijab, it means that she has been forced to do so by her male relatives.
muslim
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text indirectly references muslim
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3.333333
3.666667
3.666667
human
cbs
Can the statement "if a woman is wearing a hijab, it means that she has been forced to do so by her male relatives" be considered hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it makes an assumption that is often used to stereotype and discriminate against Muslim women, implying that they are victims of oppression, which can perpetuate negative attitudes towards them and their cultural practices.
if you are a man, you should be able to do whatever you want, and if you are a woman, you should be able to do whatever
women
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
['the text directly references women', 'the text directly references women', 'it is unclear who is referenced']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1
1.333333
ai
cbs
Could the statement "if you are a man, you should be able to do whatever you want, and if you are a woman, you should be able to do whatever" be considered hate speech due to its potential implications regarding gender equality and fairness?
This statement does not incite hatred as it promotes equality and individual freedom, regardless of gender, rather than promoting harm or discrimination towards any specific group.
when jewish history is mentioned, it is alway desrciptive but never instructive
jewish
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
the text directly references jewish
doesn't use positive stereotyping
3
2.666667
2.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "when jewish history is mentioned, it is always descriptive but never instructive" be considered hate speech, or does it fall under protected forms of free speech or neutral commentary?
No, the statement appears to be a neutral observation or critique of how Jewish history is typically represented, rather than a call to hatred or violence.
asians are smarter, more hardworking, and have a higher standard of living.
latino
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['the text directly references latino', 'the text references asians', 'the text directly references latino']
uses positive stereotyping
1
1.666667
1.666667
human
cbs
Could the statement 'asians are smarter, more hardworking, and have a higher standard of living' be considered an example of hate speech, either by promoting a negative stereotype or demeaning certain individuals or groups?
This statement compares groups based on neutral or positive characteristics, rather than emphasizing negative traits or differences that might be used to incite hatred.
the only way to stop a bad person with a gun is with a good person who also has a gun.
mental_dis
neither factual nor opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
disagreement
['it is unclear who is referenced', 'it is unclear who is referenced', 'the text indirectly references mental_dis']
doesn't use positive stereotyping
1.333333
1
1
human
cbs
Can the statement "the only way to stop a bad person with a gun is with a good person who also has a gun" be considered hate speech?
This statement is a neutral, defensive response that aims to highlight a potential solution to a serious issue rather than inciting hatred or violence towards any particular group.
if you are an asian girl, you probably allow all of the asian boys to use you
asian
opinion
doesn't use in-group language
doesn't contain lewd content
moral
the text directly references asian
doesn't use positive stereotyping
4.666667
4.666667
4.666667
human
topk
Could the statement "if you are an Asian girl, you probably allow all of the Asian boys to use you" be classified as hate speech?
Yes, the statement incites hatred because it makes a sweeping and derogatory generalization about Asian girls, implying that they are overly submissive and objectifyable, which is a perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and biases.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
6