Datasets:
ArXiv:
License:
| license: cc-by-4.0 | |
| # MIBench | |
| This dataset is from our EMNLP'24 (main conference) paper [MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15272) | |
| ## Introduction | |
| <div align="center"> | |
| <img src="overview.webp" alt="Overview" style="width: 500px; height: auto;"> | |
| </div> | |
| **MIBench** covers 13 sub-tasks in three typical multi-image scenarios: Multi-Image Instruction, Multimodal Knowledge-Seeking and Multimodal In-Context Learning. | |
| - **Multi-Image Instruction**: This scenario includes instructions for perception, comparison and reasoning across multiple input images. According to the semantic types of the instructions, it is divided into five sub-tasks: General Comparison, Subtle Difference, Visual Referring, Temporal Reasoning and Logical Reasoning. | |
| - **Multimodal Knowledge-Seeking**: This scenario examines the ability of MLLMs to acquire relevant information from external knowledge, which is provided in an interleaved image-text format. Based on the forms of external knowledge, we categorize this scenario into four sub-tasks: Fine-grained Visual Recognition, Text-Rich Images VQA, Vision-linked Textual Knowledge and Text-linked Visual Knowledge. | |
| - **Multimodal In-Context Learning**: In-context learning is another popular scenario, in which MLLMs respond to visual questions while being provided with a series of multimodal demonstrations. To evaluate the model’s MIC ability in a fine-grained manner, we categorize the MIC scenario into four distinct tasks: Close-ended VQA, Open-ended VQA, Hallucination and Demo-based Task Learning. | |
| ## Examples | |
| The following image shows the examples of the multi-image scenarios with a total of 13 sub-tasks. The correct answers are marked in blue. | |
|  | |
| ## Data format | |
| Below shows an example of the dataset format. The `<image>` in the `question` field indicates the location of the images. Note that to ensure better reproducibility, for the Multimodal In-Context Learning scenario, we store the context information of different shots in the `context` field. | |
| ``` | |
| { | |
| "id": "general_comparison_1", | |
| "image": [ | |
| "image/general_comparison/test1-902-0-img0.png", | |
| "image/general_comparison/test1-902-0-img1.png" | |
| ], | |
| "question": "Left image is <image>. Right image is <image>. Question: Is the subsequent sentence an accurate portrayal of the two images? One lemon is cut in half and has both halves facing outward.", | |
| "options": [ | |
| "Yes", | |
| "No" | |
| ], | |
| "answer": "Yes", | |
| "task": "general_comparison", | |
| "type": "multiple-choice", | |
| "context": null | |
| }, | |
| ``` | |
| ## Citation | |
| If you find this dataset useful for your work, please consider citing our paper: | |
| ``` | |
| @article{liu2024mibench, | |
| title={Mibench: Evaluating multimodal large language models over multiple images}, | |
| author={Liu, Haowei and Zhang, Xi and Xu, Haiyang and Shi, Yaya and Jiang, Chaoya and Yan, Ming and Zhang, Ji and Huang, Fei and Yuan, Chunfeng and Li, Bing and others}, | |
| journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15272}, | |
| year={2024} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |